Session: b31a476f-74c8-469b-a3c6-e70a6fdbcba6
Coverage
13
Selected
13
Completed
0
Reused
0
Failed
0
Waived
Token Usage
4.78M
Prompt Tokens
130.69K
Completion Tokens
4.91M
Total Tokens
77
LLM Requests
4.31M
Cache Read
0
Cache Write
File breakdown 4 files
| File | Prompt | Completion | Cache Read | Cache Write | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| config/automations/offboarding.yaml,config/services.yaml,mig… | 4.22M | 99.94K | 3.79M | 0 | 4.32M |
| templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desli… | 381.64K | 12.27K | 354.69K | 0 | 393.9K |
| tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php | 184.59K | 8.67K | 168.45K | 0 | 193.27K |
| File Grouping | 539 | 9.81K | 0 | 0 | 10.35K |
Files Reviewed 13 files
- config/automations/offboarding.yaml
- templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig
- tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php
- migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
- templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig
- src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
- src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
- templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig
- tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php
- src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php
- config/services.yaml
- src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
- tests/Config/OffboardingAutomationConfigTest.php
Session Tasks 1 tasks
File Grouping 1 requests
grouping_task
Request #1
deepseek-v4-flash
P:539 C:9.81K
67980ms
Reasoning
We need group files semantically. Need analyze.
Files:
- config/automations/offboarding.yaml (modified)
- config/services.yaml (modified)
- migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php (added)
- src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php modified
- src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php modified
- src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php modified
- src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php added
- templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig modified
- templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig modified
- templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig modified
- tests/Config/OffboardingAutomationConfigTest.php added
- tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php added
- tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php modified
Need group into semantic clusters. Likely main feature: offboarding eSocial S2299 flow automation. Files:
- config/automations/offboarding.yaml
- migrations/Version..._SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
- src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
- src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php
- templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig
- templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig
- tests/Config/OffboardingAutomationConfigTest.php
- tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php
What about config/services.yaml? likely wires the new service/automation? It's modified (+1/-0), likely config service. Need group with above.
Entity/Repository EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento modified small changes probably for new methods used by OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService or automation. Templates member_guides motivo_desligamento? It might be related to entity field label? Hmm.
Tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php modified +2/-1 likely unrelated? Need understand.
Files in same group if belong same module/feature. There may be groups:
1. Offboarding eSocial S2299 automation feature (config/automations/offboarding.yaml, config/services.yaml, migration, src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php, src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php, templates decision system list/flow detail, tests config/decision service).
2. S2299 entity/repository + motivo desligamento template? Maybe changes to specific fields/validators relating to offboarding? Let's infer.
Need careful: max 10 files per group. This set could be one group 13 files, but max 10. Need split logically or make group of 8 + other.
Let's inspect names and code mental.
Maybe main feature: "offboarding automation for eSocial termination event S2299". It includes:
- config/automations/offboarding.yaml defines automation flow.
- Migration seeds flow template.
- config/services.yaml loads config? Adds service alias?
- src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php extended to implement offboarding automation (S2299)
- src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php new service to create draft.
- templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig and flow_detail.html.twig probably to expose new automation in UI.
- tests/Config/OffboardingAutomationConfigTest.php validates config.
- tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php tests integration.
Entity/Repository/template motivo_desligamento likely modifications required to S2299 entity mapping? Maybe in automation flow, "motivo desligamento" field selection? Let's reason.
Given path templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig changed 1 line. Maybe termo termination notice document generation. The changed S2299 entity/repository likely to enable retrieving by member or batch processing during offboarding automation. Why change motivo template? Maybe to fix translation/label? Could be part of same PR? Let's infer from modified lines: Entity +4/-4 likely property annotations or constants adjustments. Repository +1/-1 likely query condition. Template +1/-1 likely changes a label to match a constant? Hmm.
Could be separate fix to eSocial S2299 data: for example changes "active" status and motivo. Need inspect mental? Not possible. But grouping by directory & concern. Since all eventually related to offboarding? Need split into two groups maybe:
- Offboarding S2299 automation flow group with files in decision_system/offboarding.
- eSocial S2299 event data entity repository and template group.
But are templates decision_system part of same? Yes.
Let's examine each:
1. config/automations/offboarding.yaml (automation definition, likely added rows for S2299 eSocial)
2. config/services.yaml (globally loads? may be changed to register new automation directory service)
3. migration adds S2299 offboarding flow template rows.
4. src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (executes automation, adds handling S2299)
5. OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php (draft generation service for offboarding)
6/7 template decision system pages to show or run automation.
8/9 tests.
Entity/Repository modifications likely used by AutomationExecutionService? Need know structure: Perhaps `AutomationExecutionService` handles many automation types. It fetches EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento through repository and calls service to create drafts. OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService likely generates `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` entity objects. Entity and repository modifications could add a method to query by company/period? Repository modified +1/-1 may add an index? Could be from created new methods to support service. If so those should be in same group.
The template `motivo_desligamento.html.twig` maybe modified to add something for offboarding? Hard to say. Filename in `member_guides_esocial_termino`, a guide. Could be associated because offboarding trigger corresponds to termination reason in S2299? Maybe changes "termination reason" display? It is likely not core test.
Test `SsmaEventValidatorTest.php` maybe unrelated: This is test of Product/Ssma SsmaEventValidator. It changed +2/-1 maybe adjusting because a service constructor now requires additional argument due to changes in services.yaml? Need skip or group with shared change? Could be a standalone test fix due to service signature change elsewhere. Since only modified file, group alone unless connected to S2299? SsmaEventValidator test not related to offboarding. Why +2/-1? Maybe because a dependency changed in services.yaml? AutomationExecutionService modified? Hmm.
Need produce groups with short label. Let's list themes:
- "Offboarding eSocial S2299 automation configuration and templates"
- config/automations/offboarding.yaml
- migrations/Version...
- templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig
- templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig
- tests/Config/OffboardingAutomationConfigTest.php
Maybe config/services.yaml, because service registration? Could be there.
- "Offboarding S2299 execution/draft services"
- src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
- src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php
- src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
- src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
- tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php
- templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig ? maybe.
But maybe all one feature; still group can have 8 files if merge entity/repo and templates. Need under 10 if include all except unrelated. Let's count main feature files 10 exactly? Let's count:
1 config/automations/offboarding.yaml
2 config/services.yaml
3 migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
4 src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
5 src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
6 src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
7 src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php
8 templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig
9 templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig
10 tests/Config/OffboardingAutomationConfigTest.php
11 tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php
Also templates company reason + test Ssma. So one group max 10. Could drop config/services.yaml? No.
Need maybe make one "core feature" group of 10, and second group for tests/templates? But all from feature should be together ideally. Since max 10, must partition.
Maybe create:
A. "Offboarding S2299 automation data/config/UI"
- config/automations/offboarding.yaml
- src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php? Hmm.
Need understand user expectation: They want grouping for review, maybe prefer clusters that can be reviewed together. Need not too literal. Could split into config/data/tests groups etc.
Possible clusters:
1. "Offboarding automation definition and seed migration"
- config/automations/offboarding.yaml
- migrations/Version...
- config/services.yaml
- tests/Config/OffboardingAutomationConfigTest.php
2. "Automation execution and S2299 draft generation"
- src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
- src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php
- src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
- src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
- tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php
- templates/...? Perhaps templates listing flows.
3. "Decision system UI automation listing"
- templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig
- templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig
4. "S2299 termination guide template tweak"
- templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig
5. "Unrelated Ssma test fix"
- tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php
But group 1 and 2 overlap; group separation could be bad if they need review together.
Alternative:
- "Offboarding automation feature (config, seed, service, decision UI)" (9 files including migration? Wait let's build:
files: config/automations/offboarding.yaml, config/services.yaml, migration, src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php, src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php, templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig, templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig, tests/Config/OffboardingAutomationConfigTest.php, tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php => 9. Then entity/repository/reason template => 3? The entity/repository maybe support core entity, perhaps group with "S2299 entity updates", not automation. But if Entity/Repository modifications used by service, perhaps should be in main feature. Then main group 11, too many. Need decide if entity/repository are closely tied to main. Since OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService likely operates on entity, and repository likely changed to add findBy? We can include them in main group and drop some UI/tests? No must include every file exactly once.
Could split main feature into "implementation" and "tests", but review should group changed files semantically, tests alongside implementation ideally. Maybe okay if tests separate because a "test cluster" with config test and service test.
Let's inspect names:
- `OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php` new: creates draft S2299 for employee offboarding.
- `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php` entity: likely stores S2299 event.
- Repository: accesses entity.
- `AutomationExecutionService.php`: probably executes offboarding automation by calling repo/service.
All absolutely one feature.
- `config/automations/offboarding.yaml`: this config might configure the workflow with actions and triggers that call AutomationExecutionService, perhaps references to DraftService.
- Migration seeds existing flows into DB from config.
- `templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig` and list_automations likely display flow, may be changed to link to this new automation; but if the feature adds a new flow template, the UI may not need modifications? The changes +1 each perhaps adding a route/button "Run" for S2299 automation. It could be in feature.
- `templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig`: maybe is part of generated offboarding document? Perhaps in DraftService or S2299 entity, there is a "reason code" map; this template shows a member guide. +1 likely change label or include another block. If the S2299 service changes entity statuses or reason codes, might need a guide template update. Less likely to be core.
- `tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php`: unrelated, likely only because services.yaml? Need maybe group with `config/services.yaml`? Let's explore possible connection: `config/services.yaml` modified +1/-0, likely adding a new argument to a service definition. If it is adding a path/automation config, it might change an existing service constructor. Test `SsmaEventValidatorTest` +2/-1 might modify mock expectations to align. But SsmaEventValidator maybe not related to automation. Could be a generic Ssma event validator test, not same.
Maybe there are hidden relationships causing all files except Ssma test to be part of one feature. But group max 10, so split.
Need perhaps label groups:
- [{"label":"Offboarding eSocial S2299 automation flow and seed data","files":["config/automations/offboarding.yaml","config/services.yaml","migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php","src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php","templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig","templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig","tests/Config/OffboardingAutomationConfigTest.php"]}]
- [{"label":"Automation execution and S2299 event data updates","files":["src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php","src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php","src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php","tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php"]}]
But config/services.yaml maybe belongs with service container; okay.
Need perhaps group "S2299 offboarding member guide" with entity? Hmm.
Let's examine path relations:
- AutomationExecutionService.php (src/Service/) major service
- tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php maybe tests AutomationExecutionService's offboarding automation. It may need config/services? This test probably creates KernelBrowser, config? It might use the template UI? The test file under Service/DecisionSystem suggests domain "decision system". It is directly relevant to AutomationExecutionService and migration/config.
- OffboardingAutomationConfigTest.php under tests/Config validates config yaml.
- `templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig` and list automations may support flow detail display for automation config. Could be included with config group.
Could group all except Entity/Repository and guide template? Need precise.
Maybe first group "Config and seed infrastructure for offboarding automation" includes config, migration, service yaml, config test. Second group "Implementation and execution S2299 offboarding" includes entity, repository, AutomationExecutionService, DraftService, execution service test. Third group "Decision system UI" includes two templates, perhaps. Fourth group "Termination guide template" and fifth Ssma test. But is that too granular? Maybe acceptable but cluster count 5.
Need produce short label descriptions. A group may contain 1 file if unrelated.
Let's consider whether tests/Config/OffboardingAutomationConfigTest.php should go with implementation rather than config. It probably reads config yaml and checks structure; naturally with config.
Given maximum 10, 13 files = maybe 3 groups:
1. "Offboarding S2299 automation configuration and seed data" (config/automations/offboarding.yaml, config/services.yaml, migration, templates UI, tests/Config)
2. "Offboarding S2299 execution service changes" (AutomationExecutionService, DraftService, Entity, Repository, test)
3. Could entity be in same? Then group 2 5.
4. "Minor template/test adjustments unrelated" (company template + Ssma test maybe separate). But perhaps company template connected to entity; Ssma separate.
Let's analyze actual code modification count to infer dependency:
- Migration +477 adds seeded offboarding eSocial flow template. likely includes many records mapping action types to config.
- `config/automations/offboarding.yaml` +21 defines a flow maybe minimal.
- `src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php` +252/-5 huge modification. likely added action handler methods for offboarding eSocial S2299.
- `OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php` +362 huge new service.
- Entity/Repository small modifications, likely accompanies new service. Could be adding constants and methods.
- Templates decision_system +1 each likely to add "executed in automation" flag? Maybe unrelated? Let's think: `flow_detail` and `list_automations` both +1. Could be because migration adds a new `decision_type` or `automation_type` enum? Actually list_automations.html.twig changed +1 maybe set active nav or icon. `flow_detail.html.twig` changed +1 similarly. Could be because there is a new "eSocial termination" automation and they want to show route link? Small UI changes, not necessarily core.
Given all changed files likely from one branch with feature. User lists "ADDED tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php"; note directory "DecisionSystem" included. Maybe domain product is "decision_system" with automations. Existing AutomationExecutionService in src/Service? Actually path `src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php` not `src/Service/DecisionSystem/AutomationExecutionService.php`? Wait changed file: `src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php`; tests under `tests/Service/DecisionSystem/...`, perhaps name indicates source under `src/Service/DecisionSystem/AutomationExecutionService.php`? But modified source path is `src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php`, no DecisionSystem. Hmm test namespace may not follow path? Could be in tests/Service/DecisionSystem because it tests `src/Service/DecisionSystem/AutomationExecutionService` from a different product? Wait maybe file listed as `src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php` because user truncated? It says `src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php` indeed. But tests/Service/DecisionSystem could group tests for decision system automations. So the application has `src/Service/DecisionSystem/AutomationExecutionService`? The user may have omitted folder? No.
Need not overthink.
Let's label all directories:
- config/automations/offboarding.yaml - under config/automations
- src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php - under `src/Service/Offboarding`
- src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php - maybe runs all config automation definitions.
- Entity & Repository for S2299 event.
- UI under templates/decision_system
- tests under tests/Services etc.
Potential cluster labels:
1. "Offboarding S2299 Automation: yaml config, seed migration, service wiring, UI/test config"
2. "S2299 event processing implementation"
3. "Unrelated test/Ssma update"
But mapping must satisfy all.
Let's search memory from Brazilian labor systems: "EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento" is eSocial event for employment termination. Offboarding automation likely triggers S2299 generation. "member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig" likely displays termination reason options in PDF. If entity constants changed (termination reason) maybe template uses those constants? repository changed query? Could be a direct consequence of changes to `EvtDesligamento` property "tipo" maybe.
Let's imagine entity modified 4 lines. Could be changed from `private string $status;` to `private ?string $status = null;`? Repository +1 line could be `->andWhere('e.ativo = :ativo')`? Actually reason? Hard to say.
The migration seed includes "Offboarding eSocial flow template" maybe new flow has statuses. It might create `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` rows. Entity and repository being modified perhaps to support automation by exposing records awaiting draft. Let's group them.
Let's aim for 3-4 groups:
Group A: "Offboarding automation config and seed flow": config/automations/offboarding.yaml, config/services.yaml, migrations seed, tests/Config/OffboardingAutomationConfigTest.php, templates/decision_system (UI for flow listing). This theme is "automation definition, seed and config validation" 7 files.
Group B: "S2299 event service and implementation": src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php, src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php, src/Entity, src/Repository, tests/Service/DecisionSystem/... , maybe company template could be tied to entity? Let's count 5 + optional template. Actually include template? If group B 6. Fine.
Group C: "Ssma test adjustment": test Ssma.
But maybe config/services.yaml should be in group B because it registers service. Migration/entity/config all cross. The group categories are somewhat arbitrary; but acceptable if each group is semantically coherent? Need group contains producers/consumers across groups. Review would not like separation of implementation and tests. Could place test in same group as implementation; config test in config group.
Group A include config, test config, migration. Group B include implementation + test. The decision system templates are UI, could in A perhaps. Let's define:
A. "Offboarding automation flow definition and UI wiring":
config/automations/offboarding.yaml, config/services.yaml, migration, templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig, templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig, tests/Config/OffboardingAutomationConfigTest.php (6 files)
B. "Offboarding S2299 event draft generation/execution":
src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php, src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php, src/Entity, src/Repository, tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php (5)
C. "Termination guide update": templates company ... (1)
D. "Unrelated Ssma validator test update": tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php (1)
Is C truly related to B? Maybe likely yes, small template update. But if we group it with B, B has 6. Need not separate A? A would still 6. Let's include company template in B? Then B = termination guide plus implementation, maybe label "eSocial S2299 offboarding document/draft flow". Is that coherent? S2299 termination reason guide and draft service same feature. Yes.
Could include Ssma test in some related service? No.
Need decide "config/services.yaml" with A or B. Usually `config/services.yaml` register classes as services, not automation flow. Since new service autowired automatically if using PSR-4? Symfony services.yaml generally custom config. +1/-0 likely adds `App\Service\Offboarding\` to resource path. It supports Duplicate? Let's inspect: if `services.yaml` modified only one line, maybe new service resource. This is part of implementation wiring.
Could be moved to B:
A: config/automations/offboarding.yaml, migration, test config, UI templates.
B: config/services.yaml + src/more.
But "config/automations" + "config/services.yaml" both in config. Hmm.
Maybe better to split by code ownership/review:
1. Config & migration for Offboarding eSocial S2299 (config/automations/offboarding.yaml, config/services.yaml, migration, OffboardingAutomationConfigTest.php)
2. Offboarding S2299 logic and test (AutomationExecutionService, OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService, EsocialS2299 entity/repo, execution test)
3. Decision system UI flow tweaks (list_automations, flow_detail)
4. Termination guide razon template
5. Ssma unit test fix.
This is a clean 5 cluster, semantically each is coherent, but might split tests from code? no code and tests together in 1 & 2.
Maybe group 1 should include UI templates? The migration seeded flow templates will appear in decision system UI templates; likely modifications to templates could be "config/UI" for offboarding flow. Maybe not.
Let's revisit actual UI template changes:
- `list_automations.html.twig` +1 line, likely adding a badge in list for offboarding automations. Maybe a translation? `flow_detail.html.twig` +1 line. Could be adding "Copy to Offboarding"? Hard to know. We can group with decision system UI because they share directory. Should not leave a group of two just "minor UI changes"? Actually can be three with automations config.
If group "Offboarding S2299 eSocial flow seed and UI" includes yaml, migration, two templates. Good.
Need maybe include entity/repo in group "S2299 changes" with template company. Then Ssma separately.
Proposed final:
[
{"label":"Offboarding eSocial S2299 automation config and decision UI",
"files":[
"config/automations/offboarding.yaml",
"config/services.yaml",
"migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php",
"templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig",
"templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig",
"tests/Config/OffboardingAutomationConfigTest.php"
]
},
{"label":"eSocial S2299 offboarding draft service and execution",
"files":[
"src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php",
"src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php",
"src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php",
"src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php",
"tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php",
"templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig"
]
},
{"label":"Unrelated Ssma event validator test update",
"files":["tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php"]
}
]
Is this good? Need every file once. Company template in group 2 maybe semantically fine (termination reason display). If it was actually an unrelated typo, still not harmful but group should semantically related.
Need perhaps make "label" brief. Good.
But concern: Group A and B overlap relationships: A includes test config, but no service source. B includes config/services? No, config/services in A. Hmm config/services might wire service from B. If config/services.yaml changed is not automation config but implementation, review A and B separately may need context. Maybe include config/services.yaml with B? Then A: config/automations, migration, config test, templates UI. Services yaml is implementation wiring. Let's consider "producer/consumer relationships" not strictly required? It says group changed files semantically. If config/services.yaml simple registration for new service, it must be with new service. So config/services should be in B. Then A count 5. B count 6.
Let's set:
A. Offboarding S2299 automation flow seed and UI:
- config/automations/offboarding.yaml
- migration
- list_automations template
- flow_detail template
- tests/Config/OffboardingAutomationConfigTest.php
B. Offboarding S2299 execution services:
- config/services.yaml
- src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
- src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php
- src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
- src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
- tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php
C. S2299 member termination guide template:
- templates/company/... (maybe delete? It could also be in B? Let's keep in B? If B already large 6, can include 7. Maybe include this as "S2299 termination guide update" with B? It's also implementation but not service. If file is part of feature, grouping B with C one group may be more coherent. But "service group" with UI template weird. Need maybe group on feature. Could group all S2299 files (entity/repo/templates) with service group? B would include company template; no problem. But B label "Offboarding S2299 event processing and termination guide" ?
Wait, overall goal is code review grouping. Maybe group by file dependency not by labels.
Maybe there are 2 broad themes:
1. "Offboarding eSocial S2299 automation" includes all files except Ssma test. It is 12 files (too many). Need split into two because max 10:
- Main group: config yaml, migration, automation service, draft service, entity, repository, tests config/test execution? That's 8.
- UI/templates group: 2 templates + company template? 3. Also config/services yaml maybe? We can include config/services in main, then UI group. This is perhaps best.
Let's count main: config/automations/offboarding.yaml, config/services.yaml, migration, src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php, src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php, src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php, src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php, tests/Config/OffboardingAutomationConfigTest.php, tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php = 9. Good.
UI templates group: templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig, templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig, templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig = 3. But company template is not decision system UI, perhaps derive from main. Put company template in main -> 10, UI group ->2. Let's do feature split:
A "Offboarding S2299 automation config/backend" = 10 including company template. B "Decision system UI automation links" = 2. C Ssma test =1. This respects relationship all feature under A/B. The labels less semantically pure? A includes too many cross categories.
Let's decide based on maximum. Maybe:
- A: Core offboarding S2299 automation code, config, migration, tests (9 files: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,10,11; but max 9? Actually count above 9? Let's count with no UI/company: config yaml, config services, migration, entity, repo, AutomationExecution, DraftService, ConfigTest, ExecutionTest = 9)
- B: Offboarding S2299 UI templates (decision system list/flow detail, company guide template) = 3.
- C: Ssma test.
This seems attractive because A is pure backend, B UI templates share offboarding S2299 domain, and C separate.
However, the company UI template (member guide termination reason) is not "decision system UI"; but B label "Offboarding eSocial S2299 UI/guide templates" covers both. It is also S2299 termination.
Would reviewers like grouping all UI templates? Probably yes.
Need ensure migration config test in A and UI templates in B because they don't depend? yes.
Let's verify max: A has 9. B has 3, C 1.
Let's perhaps label:
A "Offboarding eSocial S2299 automation backend/config"
B "Offboarding eSocial S2299 UI/guide template updates"
C "Unrelated Ssma validator test update"
But entity/repo modifications 4/-4 maybe due to backend not UI. good.
Need think about tests/Service/DecisionSystem test in A: It will exercise UI? It may render pages. If the modified templates are not in the same group, tests may fail? But direct file grouping not dependency.
Potential best grouping maybe:
A. "Offboarding S2299 automation definition and seed migration"
config/automations/offboarding.yaml, config/services.yaml, migration, tests/Config/OffboardingAutomationConfigTest.php
B. "Offboarding S2299 execution logic, entity and test"
src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php, DraftService, Entity, Repository, execution test, company guide template, decision system templates? No too many.
Need maybe choose final not too fragmented.
Let's search for possible functional dependencies in names:
- `AutomationExecutionService` likely uses config/automations/offboarding.yaml. It may read definitions by ID.
- `templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig` maybe displays flow definitions. It probably calls flow detail route.
- `templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig` displays list of automations.
These two UI templates are related to each other; they should be grouped together at minimum, probably with automation config? Maybe group "Automations UI" only if not with core.
- `config/automations/offboarding.yaml` +21/-0 and `tests/Config/OffboardingAutomationConfigTest` validates this yaml; definitely group.
- Migration seeds DB from that yaml; should be group.
- Execution service and draft service need review with config to understand semantics; but impossible to avoid if 13? Could use 2 groups:
A Backend feature 9 as above
B UI templates 3
C unrelated
This is simple.
Let's choose final with 9-file group "Offboarding eSocial S2299 automation backend" and 3-file UI group "Offboarding eSocial S2299 automation UI templates". Need C one file. Does every file appear exactly once? yes.
Let's run count:
A:
1 config/automations/offboarding.yaml
2 config/services.yaml
3 migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
4 src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
5 src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
6 src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
7 src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php
8 tests/Config/OffboardingAutomationConfigTest.php
9 tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php
B:
templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig
templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig
templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig
C:
tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php
This excludes templates from core tests, but okay.
But perhaps `templates/company/member_guides...` may be used by DraftService? If not, group with UI. If more related to S2299 entity, still in UI. Fine.
Could there be a better cluster of decision templates + config/services? Hmm.
Let's think if `tests/Config/OffboardingAutomationConfigTest` and `tests/Service/DecisionSystem/Offboarding...` in same group with all backend; yes.
Need final JSON with array. Be mindful no explanation before JSON. Output only JSON.
Let's maybe refine labels:
A: "Offboarding eSocial S2299 automation backend/config/tests"
B: "Offboarding eSocial S2299 UI template adjustments"
C: "Ssma event validator test update"
Need include path list with exact strings.
Let's consider if config/services.yaml maybe in B? No.
Let's inspect directories:
`migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php` is added. It seeds "OffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate".
Config yaml `offboarding.yaml` likely is new? Wait MODIFIED with +21/-0 means existing 0 lines? In diff notation +21/-0 can mean newly added? Lines 0 to 21, yes ADD? But file listed as MODIFIED not ADDED. If path absent before? It was modified but only additions, could be "created" but tool denotes modified. It adds an automation flow.
`config/services.yaml` +1/-0 registers `App\Service\Offboarding\OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService`.
`AutomationExecutionService.php` +252/-5 significant. It may add many new public methods.
`DraftService.php` +362 new.
`Entity` & `Repository` small changes likely required to expose data? Could be direct.
Tests huge. Good.
Could group "src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php +4/-4" and "template motivo_desligamento.html.twig" with a "termination reason" update. Wait maybe entity changed reason labels. Example:
- EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento has property `motivoDesligamento`? Template uses motivos. The entity +4/-4 and template +1/-1 could be related to the disappearance of a `tipo`? If entity property changed from `motivoDesligamento` to `motivoDesligamentoRaw`? Template +1 could be related exactly. But Entity/Repository in our A includes entity but not template. Should we align? Hmm.
Maybe if entity changes a property value, repository changes query. Need likely from backend; template guide uses same values; UI template must align. If we split entity and template into groups, a reviewer may miss cross-reference. Better to group the template with the entity/repo? But then core backend? Need reconsider.
File path `templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig` (not decision_system) likely displays "motivo desligamento" option list. The entity `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` might be used by the guide? Actually "member_guides_esocial_termino" likely documents generated to employees? It may include textual descriptions by code. The code change +1/-1 perhaps adds or corrects a line for new motivo code from S2299 constants. If entity constants changed +4/-4, this template update is exactly a result. Repository +1 maybe no.
Thus we should put this template in the same group as entity. But if our A broad feature group includes entity/repo, adding template makes 10. That works if we place company template in A and move one UI decision template to B? Wait limits. Let's count A with company:
A: 10 (config yaml, services, migration, entity, repo, automation, draft, config test, exec test, company template). B: decision UI 2. C: Ssma.
This might be better than previous B including company, because entity and company template together. But company guide is presentation; group A is unwieldy but okay.
Could instead create small cluster "S2299 termination reason code/UI update":
- src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
- src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php? Maybe repository not related to template. Hmm.
- templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig
Then group rest. But if entity/repo changes are for DraftService, we'd split repo from DraftService and reduce context. But maybe modified diff lines indicate repo added method `findByOffboardingId`? Need no.
Let's inspect path: `src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php` (4 lines) and `src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php` (1 line) likely modified to add relation to "company member" and a method to find by "automation execution". This is for backend. The template change might be an independent fix to display `motivo_desligamento` labels due to adding new migration? hmm.
Given software review often puts service implementation + entity/test together; template code with Ssma? Not sure.
Let's maybe avoid splitting small every cluster into context. Use two broad features:
- Group A non-template: 9
- Group B templates: 3
No entity/template cross but acceptable because all belong to main feature, just separated by file type.
The instructions imply "files in same group typically ... i18n/config variants etc." But no explicit requirement for tests in same group as code. Grouping by changed files semantically. UI templates are semantically part of UI.
I think final output with main backend + UI template group + Ssma is robust.
Need maybe mention label "Automation implementation and seed data" not too broad.
Let's write JSON array with order. A maybe group:
label: "Offboarding eSocial S2299 automation backend/config/tests"
files as above.
Need verify no file in group over 10. yes.
Will evaluator expect a different clustering? It might have known clustering? Hard but no precise correct. We need produce valid JSON.
Let's ensure no extra text; JSON only.
Potential issue: Since group B is templates including company guide and decision UI; `templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig` and `flow_detail.html.twig` relate to "automation UI"; company template relates to "employee guide". Together label "Offboarding eSocial S2299 UI/template updates" yes.
Maybe "motivo_desligamento" not related to offboarding automation UI? It is in `esocial_termino`, S2299 termination. It is related to same S2299. Fine.
Ssma test update group label "Unrelated Ssma event validator test change".
Let's produce final.
[
{
"label": "Offboarding eSocial S2299 automation backend/config/tests",
"files": [
"config/automations/offboarding.yaml",
"config/services.yaml",
"migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php",
"src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php",
"src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php",
"src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php",
"src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php",
"tests/Config/OffboardingAutomationConfigTest.php",
"tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php"
]
},
{
"label": "Offboarding eSocial S2299 UI/template updates",
"files": [
"templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig",
"templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig",
"templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig"
]
},
{
"label": "Unrelated Ssma event validator test update",
"files": [
"tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php"
]
}
]
Conversations 3 files
config/automations/offboarding.yaml,config/services.yaml,migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php,src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php,src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php,src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php,src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php,tests/Config/OffboardingAutomationConfigTest.php,tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php 50 requests
plan_task
Request #1
deepseek-v4-flash
P:40.48K C:24.47K CR:1.41K CW:0
209809ms
Reasoning
token consumption is fine. Let me analyze deeply.
We have a large PR: offboarding eSocial S-2299 draft automation. Files in review group:
- config/automations/offboarding.yaml
- config/services.yaml
- migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
- src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
- src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
- src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
- src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php
- tests/Config/OffboardingAutomationConfigTest.php
- tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php
Also other changed files listed (twig changes, SsmaEventValidatorTest) but not in review group.
I need to analyze potential issues, plan tool calls (code_search, file_read_diff, file_find) for verification. Output issues sorted by severity desc.
Let me carefully examine the diffs.
1. config/automations/offboarding.yaml: adds action `create_esocial_s2299_draft` with allowed_triggers employee_enters_stage, blocked_triggers list, config_preset to flow_responsible. Test asserts blocking triggers include offboarding_completed and exit_date. Note: offboarding_completed appears in blocked_triggers, and the yaml shows blocked_triggers includes "offboarding_completed" — offboarding_completed blocked. Wait — but the migration seeds automation `Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299) ao entrar na etapa final` using triggerType 'on_enter' mapped to action create_esocial_s2299_draft... employee_enters_stage corresponds to on_enter. OK.
Note in YAML action has `blocked_triggers` including offboarding_completed; migration also includes a `create_processo_seletivo` automation triggered at on_offboarding_complete. Those seem consistent.
Potential issue: In migration `ensureStage` looks up existing stages by name across template with product_slot_index IS NULL; nothing severe.
Let's check the YAML key spelling rule: check spelling errors in yaml-keys. Keys: allowed_triggers, blocked_triggers, blocked_trigger_message, config_preset, has_config, description, icon, title, type, id. All plausible.
2. config/services.yaml: adds setter injection call `setOffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService` to a service — likely AutomationExecutionService. Note Automations...
Interesting detail: The service definition around line 1494 is under a comment “# CRM Automation Service — explicit logger arg + setter injection for CrmBpmnService” — Wait! In the diff, the setter call added is inside which service definition? The diff context shows preceding lines with `App\Service\BpmnCommunicationCenterBridge`, `NotificationsCenterService`, `FinancialFlowAutomationExecutor` and then the comment `# CRM Automation Service...`. Actually the added line is `- [setOffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService, ['@App\Service\Offboarding\OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService']]` inserted before the "CRM Automation Service" comment. The previous lines (setBpmnCommunicationCenterBridge etc.) suggest this is the AutomationExecutionService service definition region. Need to check whether the added setter call is under the correct service: is it under `App\Service\AutomationExecutionService:` or under CRM Automation Service (a different service? Actually comment suggests `App\Service\CrmAutomationService`). Need plan: file_read_diff config/services.yaml wider context or code_search for setOffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService/AutomationExecutionService in services.yaml. The risk: the setter might be attached to CrmAutomationService rather than AutomationExecutionService — actually comment "# CRM Automation Service — explicit logger arg + setter injection for CrmBpmnService" comes after; the added line is before the comment, so likely within the AutomationExecutionService block. But worth verifying. However careful: if the service does fallback instantiation, no error; but DI wiring misplacement could mean the setter never gets called for AutomationExecutionService in prod (relying on lazy fallback creating a new service without router). Router optional so ok. But let's verify via code_search in config/services.yaml near 1494 for the service the calls belong to.
3. Migration `Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php`:
- isTransactional false.
- Checks table existence list; if any missing return.
- Find active product id by slug offboarding active=1.
- Query workflows of slug fluxo-de-saida where company has package feature offboarding... mirrors package feature logic.
- For each workflow row: ensure workflow product, ensure template, ensure template product, ensure stages.
- down(): find templates with seed_migration setting; delete workflow_products only if workflow_product_was_created; deactivate template; set settings seed_migration_rolled_back.
Potential bugs:
a) ensureTemplate looks up flow_templates by workflow_id AND JSON... seed equal. If a template exists from previous partial run, returns it. Fine.
b) In up(): For each workflow, `ensureTemplate($companyId, $workflowId...)` — template insertion uses company_id of workflow company. Fine.
c) The SQL mimicking hasPackageFeature: condition: company.service_package_id IS NULL OR (EXISTS active package AND EXISTS plan_features has_access=1). But what about legacy companies with a package that is NOT active? It says pacote inativo => bloqueado — but here if c.service_package_id is NOT NULL and package not active, then outer OR condition fails since second branch false => no rows. That matches CompanyAppVisibilityService mirrored. Potential mismatch if service_package has `is_active` default etc. But they included is_active IS NULL OR true. Hmm.
d) Table list check uses table names without DB prefix but code elsewhere uses tableExists helper with raw name — migration runs with same connection default schema; OK.
e) `ensureOffboardingStages` seeds stages into flow_templates; this flow template is per company+workflow. It queries by template id & product id & name, product_slot_index IS NULL. If template exists (ensureTemplate returns id if already inserted) but stages were partially inserted then okay, but if existing template returned but created with different stage name from constant, still same name. fine.
f) **important**: In ensureStage, existing lookup matches by (flow_template_id, product_id, product_slot_index IS NULL, name) — if a previous manual template with same name exists but with different structure, seed would skip... The template itself is keyed only by workflow & seed key, so template unique. Only created by this migration. Not issue.
g) ensureAutomation inserts with flow_template_id NULL; though auto increment stage Id present. Note uniqueness check on (flow_stage_id, name, trigger_type, action_type). If preexisting automation differs config, skip. OK idempotent.
h) down() — deletes workflow_products only where not exists other active template linked to same workflow/product. Then sets is_active=0. But down does not delete templates, stages, activities, automations — they remain in DB but inactive template. That's acceptable per many seeds? But down should ideally delete them; it leaves orphan records. Could be flagged low/medium: rollback leaves flow_stages/activities/automations of the deactivated template in DB. But maybe acceptable pattern.
i) Up runs without transaction, uses isTransactional false presumably due to DDL? No DDL here. Not an issue.
j) `ensureTemplateProduct` — lookup where slot_index=0 exists returns; insert with template_type 'fixo' strings.
k) `findActiveProductId('offboarding')` if product doesn't exist return; but if product inactive still no row. If product exists and active but workflow rows list empty due to service packages inactive — skip... But: For companies with service package that does NOT include feature offboarding (has_access=0/null), no template is seeded — by design. However the biggest risk: seeding production data migration that creates per-company flow templates only when the company has the offboarding package feature. If a company later subscribes to offboarding, migration already ran so no template — this is a one-time seed, doesn't cover future subscriptions. Probably acceptable for prod with planning? Actually PR description says "cria flow padrão ... apenas em empresas elegíveis". Future subscribing companies would need their own mechanism. This is a functional gap though maybe by design due to constraint of migrations: future companies won't get the template. Hmm — but many such "seed" migrations are meant just for existing tenants and new ones via product onboarding. Worth medium maybe. But careful — don't over-flag. Could mention because the template is only seeded for currently eligible companies; any company that becomes eligible later through package purchase won't have it. But maybe there's a separate mechanism to create a flow template on activation. We can't confirm. Plan code_search: look for CompanyAppVisibilityService / product activation code creating templates. It's more speculating.
l) down() looks up templates where JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings,'$.seed_migration')) equals key. In ensureTemplate settings: 'seed_migration' => SEED_KEY. OK. In down unset & set rolled back key. Also set is_active=0, so re-running `up()` after down: ensureTemplate queries for active template with seed_migration; not found (inactive & without key), creates new template. Old rows remain with is_active 0 (template), but its stages/automations/product links remain with references to gone template. Then up inserts new. Since product row remains linked? down removed workflow_products only in specific case (workflow_product_was_created true and no other active templates referencing product). If workflow_product_was_created false (pre-existing link), down leaves workflow_products intact. Up ensureWorkflowProduct no-op. New template. OK idempotent-ish.
m) **Version ordering issue**: Migration name `Version20260901171000` future-dated (Sep 2026?). current time Sep 3 2026 — ok.
n) Migration date docs: user rules: every migration that creates/alters table/column/index/parameter or seed needs docs in docs/database-changes. Background says doc created at docs/database-changes/2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template.md. Not in diff visible (maybe in other changed files? Not listed). Other changed files list does not include md docs, but it includes templates etc. Actually changed list in diff shows only subsets. Summary says md=2 changed. Could include. We can't just assert missing. Perhaps plan file_find docs/database-changes. Hmm but output should rely on diff...
Now the biggest code review points.
4. Entity change: `getPercAliment(): ?string`, setPercAliment ?string; `getVrAlim()/setVrAlim` ?string. But wait — Entity mapping? The column type may still be decimal etc. Changing type of field to string while Doctrine mapping? Let's check the entity property types: `private $percAliment` presumably column decimal? The getters return string format "12.50". The Entity column mapping likely decimal(5,2)? Not shown in diff. Changing property to string would persist string into decimal column; Doctrine could handle string -> decimal DB conversion. But if the rest of code does arithmetic on getVrAlim maybe type issues. Field types in XML annotations absent. Need verify mapping. Also if DBAL type decimal, read returns string anyway. Might be to format with two decimals. Another callers may compare int. Need code_search for getVrAlim/getPercAliment usages.
5. Repository change logic for indPagtoApi:
Old: `$data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N'` — would emit warning for null, toggling false.
New: `isset($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado']) && $data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] !== '' ? ($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N') : null` — careful: isset false if null; then expression left part false => null. But right side uses ternary precedence. Ternary is left-assoc; `a && b ? x : y` parses `(a && b) ? x : y`. OK: if avisoPrevioIndenizado = '0' as a string (falsy non-empty? '0') => condition non-empty true && '0' truthy false => 'N'. If false => N. If true => S. fine. If null => null. If 0 numeric? isset true, !== '' true, ? '0' false => N — maps to N though value 0 possibly means not filled vs N? For "0" string maybe means not informed? Aviso prévio indenizado boolean, 0 indicates N probably fine. If '' => null.
So fix handles null/empty; but the logic changed semantics when data has key and null => save null instead of N. Probably intended per commit "handle null and empty values correctly". Not issue.
Wait: expression `isset(...) && ... !== '' ? (...)` — Actually operator precedence: `??` lower? We have only `?:` and `&&`. `&&` higher than `?:`. So as described.
6. AutomationExecutionService changes:
- a new action dispatch `'create_esocial_s2299_draft' => $this->executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft(...)`.
Let's look at surrounding dispatch — probably a switch/map near line 502. Need check that action executed with `FlowInstanceMember $member` nullable; signature `executeAction`? function expects member may be FlowInstanceMember|null? Actually tests call `$service->executeAction([...], $member);` Good.
- `system_sender` support added in email config (line around 7039) and chat behavior `isSystemSender`.
Need to examine broader changes in the chat notify function to detect regressions: previously `$isPayrollSystemSender = $member instanceof FlowInstanceMember && ...sourceType PayrollClosingBpmnService::SOURCE_TYPE`. Now `$isSystemSender = filter_var(config.system_sender) || (...sourceType ...)`. Then `if ($isSystemSender) ...` messaging same. This opening could allow any automation config to set system_sender=true sending message as Adriana — but this config comes from YAML automation definitions (admin/company editable?) or user input. The code at line ~7039 earlier maps `'system_sender' => $config['system_sender'] ?? null`. If automation config is user-controllable (company builds automations), possible spoofing as Adriana? Need severity: if user can set arbitrary system_sender true in automation action, they can send messages as system/Adriana. That's a privilege/authorization issue. But where did config come from? During running an action with config stored by automation; company admins. In this codebase, templates YAML may include. Could be configured by the company's admins via UI constructing automation actions. If a regular user within company configured send_notification action with system_sender=true, the chat shows as Adriana to another member. Is that security relevant? Adriana messages appear system-trusted. Medium maybe.
Actually more important: `$config['system_sender'] ?? null` at line ~7039 is in a different function built from config for action; new logic possible for all notification actions, so each send_notification action can set system_sender? But where stored config and who controls it: for this PR's action, config is static from YAML action default? At `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, config includes system_sender true then passes to executeNotify. Need confirm this code is in dispatch function; but since the same `$config['system_sender']` used generally.
- New method executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft:
- checks member context, source type.
- flowInstance etc.
- company esocial mode null => skip.
- find offboarding member from flow instance member; findCompanyMember
- responsible resolution
- EsocialDadosTrabalhador lookup by companyMember
- build payload
- If no trabalhador -> missing; else find remuneracao by trabalhador; if none missing; if exists find event linked to offboarding; ...
- Logic concern: if event official (non-pendente) then no persist update. But then they still notify official exists. fine.
- In case existing event is pendente (eventStatus='updated') or created; apply; persist; flush.
- Then sourceMetadata stored with esocialS2299Draft, including payload full worker data; persist flush. then event id if created; flush again.
- **Then notify** after flush. Wait event created via draftService->createDraftEvent and set data & persisted & flushed before id. Then metadata has eventId? After first flush, event id set; they set metadata eventId in metadata initially null? Actually metadata set before flush with eventId = $event?->getId() (after first flush it has id), then flush member; then after second flush event id assigned. Wait event created & persisted & flushed (line "entityManager->persist($event)" then flush after global? Let's trace:
```
if ($eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable') { ... persist($event); }
$reviewUrl...
$metadata['esocialS2299Draft'] = [... 'eventId' => $event?->getId(), ...]
$member->setSourceMetadata; persisted; flush; // flush persists event and person.
if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
$metadata2 = $member->getSourceMetadata(); ... eventId = $event->getId(); member set; persist; flush;
}
```
yes; before flush, getId for new event is null but after flush event id set, second metadata update updates.
- notification call: executeNotify with `to company_member ... system_sender true`, member context with member_id companyMember id.
Potential problems in this new method:
- Very large private method added to already huge AutomationExecutionService — user rules say god object, any increase is the most important finding. In the diff the AutomationExecutionService is already enormous (14k+ lines single class; clearly god class) and this PR adds a private method of 240 lines plus a service creation... The new OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService is extracted, which alleviates somewhat, but the orchestration method was added to the 14k-line class. The user-specific priority says god object increase = most important. So plan to flag high/medium severity for god object burden. Typically first issue high.
- Also in getOffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService lazy fallback using `new OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService($this->entityManager, $this->router)` — if container wiring setter works (config/services yaml) then fine. If instance created without setter, uses router optional. But if service created elsewhere manually with "new" that doesn't satisfy constructor? They claim compatibility; but tests instantiate AutomationExecutionService via `new` and pass em as 1st arg, router as 9th? Let me check the constructor! Diff shows existing calls — `AutomationExecutionService($em, new MockHttpClient())` and with router at 9th argument. So router may be nullable anyway.
Now in `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` — no try/catch around repository? It catches Throwable around all and logs error. Fine.
Concern: Existing worker-data payload: when missing esocial data, they still notify "complete data and open chat"; fine.
Potential issue: if eventStatus = updated and !empty(missing)? if missing empty. since missing implies no event. Fine.
Potential issue: if `$event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $eventStatus === 'existing_not_editable'`, they did not set event dados? irrelevant.
Potential issue: After persisting event, they call `$this->entityManager->flush()` mid-method then executeNotify later can send notifications; if notify then failure not relevant. Not necessarily transactional issue.
- **Real potential bug**: When responsible resolution fails return success false, but do we consider as critical failure or should skip if no responsible? Since action config preset to flow_responsible, if not resolved, automation "fails" on a member movement—will automation runner mark error? It logs warning. Behavior: returns `['success'=>false,'error'=>...]`; depends on caller of executeAction to treat action failure: likely system resumes? Need check how actions dispatcher handles errors; if error stops the rest actions in automation? For the action chain maybe not. But not severe.
- **Date parse**: `dateOrNull` uses `new \DateTime($value)`. If the date string is from user config maybe timezone. fine.
- **decimalOrNull**: For values like "12,5" con one digit? conversion no decimals; For "12.345,67" => strip dots then comma->dot = 12345.67 correct; But "12.50" without comma: normalized '12.50'; numeric true; number_format 2 decimals => "12.50" if numeric 12.5 would output 12.50. Fine. For value "1000.00"? number_format(1000.00,2) = "1000.00". OK.
- **booleanStringOrNull**: 'S' returns S. Accepts "true"/"1" etc. For aviso prévio indenizado, config value maybe 'N' etc.
- **Entity type change and repository data**:
Old persisted integers PercAliment = percentage as int (12). If in DB stored decimal 12.00. Changing setter type to string means old int passed? Any usage persists existing int? Not conversion at storage.
- **OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService entityManager dependency constructor**: Uses EM in service; okay.
- **findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal query** with `(event.dtDeslig = :dismissalDate OR event.dtDeslig IS NULL)` — if multiple pendente events with NULL dt for same employee, orderBy id desc but with null? Case. Idempotency may pick oldest. Not big issue.
- **findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal** — "official" by status != pendente; If an event exists pendente then finds pending drafts. If event exists for same date status "error"/"rejeitado", then considered official not editable — maybe incorrect to treat rejected S-2299 as official preventing draft. Statuses include 'pendente','enviado'? need check. Could flag medium: any status other than 'pendente' (including 'erro', 'rejeitado', 'cancelado') treated as official non-editable; a rejected event would block creation of a corrected draft. Need verify statuses in code. Plan code_search for setStatus in EsocialS2299... or constants. Use entity/repo. There might be many statuses: pendente, enviado, processado, erro, etc. In EsocialEvents maybe getStatus. Let's note.
- **Eventual race/double event**: not transaction locking. low.
- **`findEventLinkedToOffboarding`**: uses metadata including eventId; It ignores `dismissalDate` matching. Actually eventMatchesContext ignores date; and if metadata event corresponds with older changed date, it returns updated and propagates. That's intended.
- **eventMatchesContext verify `getCompany()?->getId()` against `$company->getId()`** If company id null? id non-null from persistence.
- **buildReviewUrl** generates url `my_company_member_manage` with member id - needs route/company context? Using RouterInterface generate without request context in async/worker context? In Symfony messenger, generating URL with router may need request context fallback; router may throw if no request. It doesn't need absolute; returns path. OK.
- **Now the big flag**: `config/services.yaml` setter may be attached to CrmAutomationService instead of AutomationExecutionService — because comment "# CRM Automation Service" is in the context AFTER the added line, which suggests the added line is in the block just before that comment. But which service does the block belong to? Prior lines with setBpmnCommunicationCenterBridge, setNotificationsCenterService, setFinancialFlowAutomationExecutor likely belong to `App\Service\AutomationExecutionService` since AutomationExecutionService has these setters (diff shows setter methods plus new). Actually those public setters in diff & FinancialFlowAutomationExecutor was added to AutomationExecutionService per previous work. Let's verify via code_search in services.yaml around. The block could be `App\Service\AutomationExecutionService`. Let's plan code_search.
- **`use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;` import** new imported and type alias.
- **`system_sender` from config** possibility for any member-controlled automation... Severity medium; but is config user-provided from saved automation created by responsible? For this PR, config is hard-coded in the action YAML default? It comes with config preset; but AutomationExecutionService map takes config from automation's stored config, which admins can create via flow config. Since corporate "Adriana" chat is system assistant, allowing any company/user to act as the assistant undermines trust. Yet the feature deliberately uses it; but should maybe be restricted to system-created config or to internal automation not user inputs. We'll add medium.
- **Automation action visibility/scope YAML**: Offboarding automations directory; action restricted triggers. Blocked_trigger_message says only trigger okay. Test config ensures. Not issue.
- **Blocked triggers list** includes `offboarding_completed`, `exit_date`, `deadline_reached`, `all_activities_completed`, ...; but doesn't include e.g. 'activity_completed'? They don't allow external? allowed triggers only employee_enters_stage. Must check allowed_triggers vs blocked_triggers semantics — in other automation configs, allowed_triggers likely auto. Test checks allowed triggers only contains employee_enters_stage. But migration requires same.
- **Migration uses automation `create_processo_seletivo` whose id/type may not be defined in that tenant product?** It's staged action for offboarding; the stage includes "Criar Processo Seletivo ao concluir offboarding" on_offboarding_complete with type create_processo_seletivo. Was that action already available? The execution map includes `'create_processo_seletivo' => $this->executeCreateProcessoSeletivo(...)` at line before; probably exists.
Table seed fields — **ensureAutomation inserts `fixed_stage_type` and `flow_template_id` null; but flow_automations may have NOT NULL flow_template_id?** unknown. Since other code populates flow_automations with template id maybe. If schema requires flow_template_id not null, insert fails. But they check generic. Need search for flow_automations inserts elsewhere to compare columns. Plan code_search.
- **`isTransactional(): false`** with multi company seed; if failure mid-run leaves partial state; but up() mostly idempotent when re-run; okay. In migrations down... anyway.
- **Rollback with deactivated template leaves linked flow_stages/automations/etc orphan** - user rules: reversible when possible; down deactivates template but leaves all stages etc. If later need to re-run down plus up; but if we rerun this migration version after down? It's recorded per table; running `migrations:migrate prev` runs down; fine. Not critical. Could be low.
- **Version date vs current date**: Today is 2026-09-03; version 20260901171000 in past.
- Another thing: migration filters only companies where feature exists "offboarding has_access=1". But for legacy where `service_package_id IS NULL`, does CompanyAppVisibilityService treat as "liberado"— yes mirrored in SQL. Fine.
- Another risk: workflow_products order_index insertion 0 upon ensureWorkflowProduct — they note preserves existing; new insert with order_index=0 may alter ordering? If none; if there are pre-existing workflow_products and offboarding product absent, they add it with order 0. Then product tabs order? `workflow_products orderIndex=0`. Comments in the diff on ensureWorkflowProduct say preserve existing order for multi-product workflows; but a brand-new product link ordering to 0 could reorder steps for workflows with product list where e.g. onboarding already at index 0... Hmm this is seed linking product; not enough context of what order_index semantically. The comment says insert order 0. It wouldn't reorder existing columns? It may place new product at column 0? If order_index matters for visual ordering of product tabs, new offboarding product with 0 may move first. But not necessarily issue.
- **Testing issues**:
- The test file instantiates huge mocks, but no integration real route. User's test rules say prefer full service — here they test AutomationExecutionService::executeAction direct, not endpoint. That's borderline; they at least cover service path. There is no test of trigger restriction end-to-end, nor the migration seeding itself. Maybe fine.
- `testCreateEsocialDraftStoresAuditMetadataWhenWorkerDataIsMissing` expects NotificationSpecialist persisted; but mailer config etc. good.
- Check `testCreateEsocialDraftUpdatesExistingPendingEventFromMetadataWithoutOverwritingFilledFields`: config motivo '02' but existingEvent motivo '01'; applyPayload onlyEmptyFields true => current non-null so Mtv not overwritten; expects '01'. good consistent.
- **Mock returns `EsocialDadosTrabalhadorRepository`?**? They getRepository(EsocialDadosTrabalhador::class) will return trabalhadorRepo. Wait earlier the automation method queries `EsocialDadosTrabalhador->findOneBy(['companyMember'=>...])`, returns trabalhador. for missing worker data returns null handled.
- Implementation uses `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::createQueryBuilder`; mocked consecutive calls first official event then pending draft. But if officialEvent null then returns null for first; second returns pending.
- The test `testCreateEsocialDraftCreatesPendingEventAndSendsChatAsAdriana` with mailer enabled; The order of query calls includes repository chain; good.
- **Strict typing issue in tests**: `$s2299Repo->method('find')->willReturnCallback(static fn(int $id)...` — fine.
- In build fixture, responsible email set only if passed; default null, userRepo returns null? Here if mailer enabled and email passed. fine.
- Does the test file compile? Need check method signatures of Entity setters exist: Company->setEsocialMode; CompanyMembers->setUser; User->setCompany; etc.
- One possible issue: Real repository `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository` mock class implementing createQueryBuilder with onlyMethods and disableOriginalConstructor: `QueryBuilder` constructor with EM etc. For `getMockBuilder(QueryBuilder::class)->disableOriginalConstructor()->onlyMethods([...])`, mocking only those methods fine; but final? QueryBuilder not final. fine.
- But `getOneOrNullResult()` on AbstractQuery requires query type? They mock AbstractQuery::class, but QueryBuilder::getQuery normally returns Query/QueryBuilder object; AbstractQuery is abstract and Query extends AbstractQuery; okay.
- **AutomationExecutionService line numbers huge** indicates 15k line; already known.
Now potential high severity bug: Entity mapping consistency. Changing getters/setters types from `int` to `string` while Doctrine mapping property maybe integer column. Need investigate mapping of `percAliment`, `vrAlim`. Look for docblock property types. The diff only shows methods, not properties. Entity properties might be `private ?int $percAliment` annotated; changing methods with return types conflicting with property docblock? PHP itself no issue since property untyped private with docblock? Actually they show no property change. If the property declared `private ?int $percAliment;` typed property then now getter returns ?string while property is int => TypeError because `return $this->percAliment;` int incompatible with string return type. That would be critical: PHP strict return types cause TypeError on every read. But diff only changed methods, so property might be untyped/doctrine. In Entities with typed property? Many Symfony entities old style with @ORM\Column annotations and no property types? Actually code style uses docblocks. Need verify. Plan code_search `percAliment` property mapping.
Let me search via code_search file src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php for percAliment property. Plan.
The entity column if it's `decimal(5,2)` and when Doctrine hydration returns string; setting int to decimal persists int okay. If decimal scale 2, storing integer 12 => Doctrine converts to '12.00'. Existing code used ?int getters, likely reading hydrated? Hmm Doctrine decimal hydration returns string, not int. If getter previously declared ?int but Doctrine mapped decimal returns string property would type error? Unless mapping type integer. Let's infer: percAliment percentage and vrAlim value alimentação, mapping might be decimal(5,2)/decimal(8,2). But previous getter declared ?int while hydrated value could be string => in non-strict PHP, string "12.00" return for int return type causes deprecation? In PHP 8.1 with strict types not in file? declare(strict_types=1) at top. Return of numeric string "12" for int return type is accepted? Return type int with string "12.00" would TypeError "must be of type int, string returned" unless coercive — strict types applies to function calls made within file; the return statement from property? For typed returns, coercion of string "12.00" to int? Numeric strings are accepted for coercive typing only when file not strict. With strict_types=1, returning "12.00" declared int throws TypeError. So previous entity can't work with decimal mappings if strict and value non-int. Unless property column integer. Perhaps `percAliment` stored as integer (percentage whole) but later decimals needed; changed methods to match data from offboarding? Hmm.
Need plan calls to read entity property/annotations and migration mapping? Column can use type 'string' with int converter? To tell if this type switch breaks callers: in templates, old Twig checks getPercAliment() int comparisons maybe? Let's assume mismatch between getter types and other code. But do not know. However this PR changes to nullables because service's decimalOrNull returns formatted '12.50'. If the column mapped decimal, persisting string right.
Given available context entirely new file + diff, migration tests expect `$event->getPercAliment()` '12.50' string. Test proves.
Now possible actual critical bug in new service `applyPayloadValue`:
```
if ($value === null) return;
$currentValue = $getter();
if ($onlyEmptyFields && !$forceOverwrite && $currentValue !== null && $currentValue !== '') return;
$setter($value);
```
For eventStatus 'updated': onlyEmptyFields true. Event built from DB: fields like `indPdv` maybe typed string null; but getters can produce ''? For initial new create status no.
But wait about original repository setIndPagtoApi? It's a different storage path.
Scenario updated: user has filled event; data from sourceMetadata includes empty strings. e.g., motivo from config: '02' always maybe but if existing Mtv '01', skip. good. Dismissal date force update; `dtDeslig` setter new date. Good.
A subtle bug: For a newly created draft event, applyPayload($event, $payload, false). Payload values default ''. For string fields, stringOrNull('') = null, meaning setter is not called because $value null; fields remain null. fine. For booleans, fine. For decimal not set -> null.
But **Motivo desligamento** empty: payload 'motivoDesligamento' maybe empty; Mtv set to? `stringOrNull('')` null skip leaving null. good after applyPayload initial.
Looking at notification title logic: if eventStatus 'created' or 'updated', notification is based not considering that payload fields missing; e.g. motivo empty, but offboarding reason? It says created. fine.
Another actual possible severe: **executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft** runs flush for event and member; but also not in DB transaction. If notify of assistant conversation etc. then rest code might fail; event already persists? Failure due to missing conversation leads error after DB commit? But asynchronous action runs in process; if later we get exception we return error but data not rolled back. They catch Throwable but they store event already flushed before notification. If notification fails (e.g., responsible user has no account?), event persists and no notification; retry action would find event existing status pendente then eventStatus ... second run with metadata eventId and no date changed, updated; attempt notify. fine.
**But consideration: retrieval of `$esocialTrabalhador` before `flowMember` data**. `findOneBy(['companyMember' => $companyMember])` returns first, maybe multiple; okay.
**Now, a really possible cross-tenant leak** in `resolveEsocialS2299Responsible`: If configuredId in config is integer matching a CompanyMembers of another company truthy but filtered by company check so returns null; good. Then fallback to flow responsible, not cross.
`executeNotify` passes `member_id` overwritten in context to companyMember id; could cause an email? fine.
`metadata['esocialS2299Draft']` stores full payload with data of employee; raw in DB source_metadata; already general metadata field may include PII? This may be considered sensitive info persistence but likely intended audit.
Security of buildReviewUrl route `my_company_member_manage` — this is a route accessible to company context? It consumes member identifier; route generation only; front shows to responsible. Exposing raw member URL in metadata only. Doesn't matter.
- **Feature eligibility skip**: Every automation executed for offboarding-only company may trigger only if flow config. no additional feature gating on server side: The YAML action requires esocial mode? Create action permitted for workflows in package with offboarding only if feature is on. The action also checks esocial mode but not workflow package feature. If an offboarding can run with template customizing action but company package current doesn't include esocial? Esocial mode would be null likely, though legacy. Fine.
Let's examine specific code at lines 13903 etc. The isSystemSender / emailConfig. This is in a large function. Now place where `$emailConfig['system_sender']` may be included then later Message? In email notification message, substitution `{{member_name}}`; they avoid raw link in plain message. reviewButtonHtml contains raw URL generated server-side with htmlspecialchars.
Potential issue: reviewUrl passed inside `message_html` through concatenated HTML (already htmlspecialchars) and via executeNotify; `system_sender` flag true. Good.
**Wait a big problem**: At line ~7039 diff adds `'system_sender' => $config['system_sender'] ?? null` to `$emailConfig`. This implies when any user configures an automation with system_sender true, e-mails may be sent as if... but the chat `isSystemSender` decision near 13912 still based on `$config['system_sender']` not on emailConfig? It operates on `$config`. This addition to email config probably needed for message labels.
Now the message of chat send: for `isSystemSender`, goes to assistantConversation and sends ChatMessage user null. But wait — this generated notification was **direct** to responsible user. For direct message with user=null render as Adriana. Great.
If `system_sender` is set in config of a generic notification used with existing offboarding actions, now all notifications would be routed to Ai assistant conversation. It changed from `$isPayrollSystemSender` to also aware config.
But for payroll source still.
- **other changed files** not in group: template change avoids `prevEvts.termino`? and SsmaEventValidator; not part of group maybe review group scope excludes. But our plan should focus listed.
We must output only summary and issues, sorted.
Need produce "Issues" section with severity, issue, tool calls. Tools not actually invoked, but described. Additional tool calls per issue one line each.
Let's formulate issues identified and tool verification needed.
Ordering: high first.
Issue 1 (high) cross-file risk: config/services.yaml inserted setter into wrong service block? Need verify. High/medium? If wrong service, in production calls to AutomationExecutionService created by container do not get service injected; fallback `new OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService($this->entityManager,$this->router)` is used. Router available (field injected). But risk no DI wiring. It has fallback, so no catastrophic. Actually if wiring absent, fallback constructs service with EM and router — most function works. So impact medium. But if fallback omitted after configuration? Right now method has fallback. Services wiring robust. But wait service's constructor depends on `EntityManagerInterface`. It works. So maybe Medium. However, comment "# CRM Automation Service" may add to the wrong service; but fallback means works. Still if setter is placed in wrong service block, config would call setOffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService on CrmAutomationService which doesn't have that setter -> Symfony DI compile error at container build -> breaking! Because the definition service receiving extra method call lacks method. That would make app crash deployment. Then high. Need verify with code_search. Let's determine service block. Context before line: `- [setBpmnCommunicationCenterBridge, ...] - [setNotificationsCenterService ...] - [setFinancialFlowAutomationExecutor ...]` + added setter then comment. These top-level setter lines are in some service. Probably under `App\Service\AutomationExecutionService:`? Let's check if CrmAutomationService has setters for those? In CrmAutomationService could be commented explicitly: "# CRM Automation Service — explicit logger arg + setter injection for CrmBpmnService" starts new service block After. If it were, added line belongs to previous service. Since prior setters (setBpmnCommunicationCenterBridge, setNotificationsCenterService, setFinancialFlowAutomationExecutor) match properties in AutomationExecutionService diff (yes, service setters near top), so block is AutomationExecutionService. Likely fine. Then not include high; but need to code_search to confirm the service name. We can include a medium issue or note no issue? Plan: Maybe issue low requiring confirm. But the review should be grounded. Since there is a fallback service, no.
Issue 2? Potential high about entity typed property TypeError:
- If `percAliment` property has native `?int`, getter returns int where method return `?string` raises TypeError. Need verify property. Plan search in same file. If native typed property, high. Entity typical code may `#[ORM\Column(type: 'integer', nullable: true)] private ?int $percAliment = null;` In that case changed return type mismatch => runtime TypeError, likely revealed by test? BUT the test creates entity and calls getPercAliment after persisting? in the test event created through service and they call getPercAliment() returns "12.50". If property was native ?int, tests would fail. Since PR author says tests run. Property could be mixed in large project legacy. So can't infer. Maybe property docblock typed? Tests passing implies property not native int. Actually with strict types and entity uses `private $percAliment;` no issue. Let's verify property in file through code_search found maybe returns `private $percAliment;` due to no type because Doctrine. So no high.
Need not overstate.
Issue 3 (high?) Repository statuses and idempotency official event detection. If status treated as 'not editable' excludes pendente, but "rejeitado"/"erro" should be editable? severity depends domain. Could break user workflow in eSocial failure situations, generating sync events misleads. Verify status enumeration. code_search on EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento setStatus calls. Let's search.
Issue 4 duplicate/race medium.
Issue 5 query uses `status != 'pendente'` where null status? Existing old rows may have status null? If older events stored no status? DQL `event.status != :pendingStatus` excludes null rows (SQL null != x yields null false). Nulls won't be caught as "existing official". Then draft created duplicate. moderate.
Need avoid too many speculative.
Issue 6 (high/medium?) for **cross-tenant / authorization via source metadata user-controlled**? Very high if config user input can set system_sender? Let's examine scope: The action's config flows from a stored automation. These automations are created by company admin? They are building UI probably accessible to company users to design flows. System_sender should be reserved internal config, but since it's serialized JSON in DB, a privileged tenant user can directly alter JSON? Not realistic. But security model: any company user able to configure "notify chat" action may set system_sender key because front UI maybe exposes? Is this a general notification service; they didn't restrict allowed config keys. If front/back saves arbitrary JSON from user form, attacker of one company could make messages appear as official Adriana assistant including phishing within company. Medium. Need understand where config_system_sender possible. Search frontend for system_sender maybe only offboarding. It also allows any automation YAML blocked triggers; since action is executed by config from DB and used by all send notifications the change to `executeNotify` may be that all notification actions that previously generated as manager now can generate as Adriana if a field is set. May be intended by feature: "notificação passa a ser enviada como Adriana".
Let's check AutomationExecutionService dispatch line: For `send_notification` config -> after emailConfig system_sender passed. then further notify with system_sender? The generic path email and chat. Since config system_sender=true is not under user's arbitrary right? hmm.
At least new `system_sender` field not validated as boolean, filter_var handles.
Issue 7 (god object increase): The file `AutomationExecutionService` is already huge (14k lines) concentrated; new 240-line orchestration method directly consolidates further, no matter extracted service. high/medium priority per user-specific custom ordering god object highest in service review. We should issue high? As severity definition high for code style? The system: high for functional/security... For internal custom "maior peso". Let's phrase as medium or high? A review plan prioritizes. Since it's a maintainability issue, medium severity by global def (performance/maintainability). But user says god object with higher weight; perhaps elevate. Many patterns would give a medium for maintainability. But issue says "worsens maintainability/regression" medium okay. Reviewer wants separate action extraction from giant. Since they already extracted service. We can say the execution orchestration (adding 240 lines to 15k god service) is still there. severity medium, maybe high given architecture weight. Choose medium.
Issue 8 (per user migration doc): Migration doc mentioned in background. In changed file list not shown. So note need check docs/database-changes/2026-09-01... file exists. Rule migration seed docs expected: plan a check that doc exists. Add medium? "Atenção" maybe low. Given user says if no corresponding file, point as pendência; description says exists, but check in current diff group may not be present. We should not assert missing because other changed files in the git PR may include (md=2). The list shown at top includes only 4 files, and our file set includes 10 (we include 9). No md; 2 md changed claimed from background. Since we don't have those MDs, likely outside group. flag as low verification.
Issue 9: The migration's up query `WHERE sp.id = c.service_package_id AND (sp.is_active IS NULL OR sp.is_active = 1)` wait — original code says if service_package exists inactive blocks. But candidate companies for seeding? They link service package. "Espelha ... sem service_package => legado liberado; pacote inativo => bloqueado; com pacote => exige has_access=1."
This matches SQL. fine.
**But wait company service_package_id can point to inactive package but no feature; condition false means no row. Good.**
What about `service_package` with is_active stored as boolean maybe N? okay.
Assume migration test via PHPCS.
Issue 10: **YAML action placement**: In test, they search `$config['actions']['movement']`. The yaml diff location? Shows actions but not section name; In actual config action in offboarding.yaml added under movement section likely near previous offboarding automation. No.
Issue 11: action `has_config: false` while config_preset to flow responsible - config_preset to default receiver. YAML UI where has_config false. But actionConfig in migration includes motivos etc. because they can configure defaults via flow setup? Hmm.
Issue 12 cross-trigger blocked: YAML frontend allowed triggers only employee enters stage. However migration's automation has stage move left/right on entry of final stage. Trigger restrictions line up.
- **Action creation via migration for manual automations:** In migration, `create_esocial_s2299_draft` automation has actionConfig '_default_automation_id' => 'offboarding_esocial_s2299_draft_on_final_stage_enter' and actionConfig includes 'to' flow_responsible. okay.
Issue 13: `OffboardingAutomationConfigTest` uses map for actions under `$config['actions']['movement']`. If the actual yaml actions section isn't movement test fails? Code author likely did align; diff hunk line after section? we don't see `movement` key. We can verify quickly code_search `id: "create_esocial_s2299_draft"`? Not needed, test presumably run.
Now more deep issues:
**Repository changed behavior `indPagtoApi`**: passing null means event detail while user hasn't chosen: If avisoPrevioIndenizado is null and status official existing? Existing scenario sets IndPagtoApi null instead of 'N'. Previously saving form with a null/false field resulted 'N'. Now a field unchecked but not sent (e.g. user left select "Selecione") saves null. Is null allowed by esocial schema? For S-2299 indPagtoAPI optional; null may be acceptable. no.
**`EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` nullable string return types mismatching Twig templates**:
e.g. in twig uses `{% if event.percAliment is not null %}` good.
What about total decimal parse: For `'12,5'` number_format((float)'12.5',2) = '12.50' fine. For `'12.345,67'`: after removing R$ % spaces = '12.345,67'. comma present: str_replace('.', '', ) => '12345,67', replace comma with dot => '12345.67', numeric -> 2dp. good. For `'12,345.67'` (US-style with comma thousands) has comma, goes through weird: remove dots none, comma -> dot => '12.345.67' not numeric -> null. But values from Brazilian UI, okay.
**potential null date**: `dateOrNull` with invalid date -> null; a user-supplied config invalid date silently dropped. That could cause no update to official? okay.
**StringOrNull does not validate motivo code** e.g. '99' invalid possible? no enum validation.
**intOrNull for pensAlim** e.g. `pensAlim` is esocial code (0/1/2). returns int. If config default '' null. fine.
**Idempotency & duplicate event if no dismissal date yet?** findPending with date null matches by worker+remuneracao only, then apply date empty -> date field stays null; update. Good.
**metadata offboardingMember resolution**:
Automation method `findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember($member)` uses `activitiesProgress['offboardingMemberId']`, tests fixture. The source id maybe used? Need inspect that method maybe existing; if can't find returns null. In tests, activitiesProgress map. it exists.
Let's verify how offboarding member map works: they looked at `$member->getSourceMetadata` and activities. not relevant.
Let's now decide the actual output content. Need make a plan for each issue with specific tools and args.
Potential concrete findings probably should mention:
1. (high/medium) **`config/services.yaml` setter injection may be in service block of CRM Automation Service?**; need check to ensure setter injection reaches `AutomationExecutionService`. Use file_read_diff on `config/services.yaml` around lines 1430-1500 or code_search `setFinancialFlowAutomationExecutor` in services.yaml to get service header; also code_search `setOffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService` to confirm registration. This is legitimately useful.
2. (medium/high) **AutomationExecutionService god object growth**. use code_search for function count maybe with text e.g. "private function" count? Tools return only 100; code_search for " private function execute" count... Maybe not so. For plan, describe. Maybe search callers of executeAction to see where action dispatch; or file_read_diff? No tool needed for maintainability? Could call code_search to count "function " occurrences—first 100, but many files. Better not. We can just list issue with no tool verify. But task says each issue can have no tools. Usually need to verify scope by file line count. But review plan tool guidance can describe code_search with regex `private function` in file to count methods (truncates) to reinforce magnitude. We may attach.
3. (medium) **Config-driven system_sender allows tenant to impersonate system assistant (Adriana)** — search where system_sender config keys get set in front/back? code_search `system_sender` across repo to identify all producers (config yaml/UI javascript/controllers) and whether only yaml trusted section; if script templates use. Then confirm action config maybe arbitrary in DB—if UI allows preserving. code_search config of notification actions to see. Good.
4. (medium) **Non-pendente (including rejected/cancelled/error) treated as official event and blocks draft; data may be stale**. code_search for statuses set on EsocialS2299/EsocialEvents to identify; maybe service of saveEventS2299 using setStatus('...'). Explain.
5. (high? medium) **`executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` updates and persists rascunho S-2299 whenever automation fires, even when there are no worker data; metadata holds offboarding fields. fine.
6. (medium) **Notif/message logic uses system_sender config but direct notifications could cause duplicate messages on repeated triggering at stage entry** — actual repeated trigger only once at stage entry; later if event updates upon moving back and forth? blocked triggers forbids exit_date etc. but employee can re-enter stage? Member moved back and then forward again triggers on_enter again; generate another chat notif. acceptable idempotent.
7. (low/medium) **No transaction around event+metadata+notification persistence**? EntityManager flush followed by external notify; if notify throws catch returns false but event persisted; retry leads update maybe preserving. Usually service operations aren't transactional but can be issue. The event and notification are logical unit; if failure after flush, status sourceMetadata eventStatus could not be updated because flush occurs before notification; On a next run, metadata restored with latest status? Once first metadata flush then event id flush done. It would be consistent. Notifications failure only loses. no.
8. (low) **Migration up runs non-transactional, partial run window can leave template partially created; idempotency functions handle re-run mostly**, but template may be created and stages failure => later rerun ensure Stages proceed; okay. Down may not fully undo (is_active 0 only leaves child rows). Possibly mention as low: down keeps stage/automation rows. But verifying? Could cause constraints if template re-created after rollback: re-up attempts INSERT using same names but stage stays tied to old inactive template, so new template duplicates. Data pollution. Down not complete; migration reversible? user rule says reversible "quando possível". Down is best effort; note as low.
Also note **empty down deactivation with multiple templates created for same migration re-running**: After down-up cycle old inactive template remains; up selects only template with seed key and `is_active`? does not check is_active, if re-up after down? down removed seed_migration from settings and sets active 0 => ensureTemplate finds none, inserts new one. Old inactive with name but no seed. There can now be two templates with same name; first inactive. Not harmful but duplicate flow template name in UI? `flow_templates` list probably filters is_active=1. Main concern: if the old template still has child automations inactive? Template is_active false maybe children not displayed. Then no duplicate.
Down also doesn't clean earlier `workflow_products` except conditional; leaves it. Maybe okay because workflow had offboarding product originally, no need to de-link if it existed.
**Risk: full migration could create hundreds/thousands of templates for every company using offboarding — huge?** Companies with offboarding feature perhaps thousands; one row per company's "Fluxos de Saída". Seeding one per company including many rows (template, stages, activities and automations) — could be heavy: maybe 5 inserts x thousands; not enormous.
**Data integrity lookups**:
`ensureStage` WHERE `product_slot_index IS NULL`; if existing seeded stage already product_slot_index = 0? New insert product_slot_index NULL. Existing in flow_stages? There may be column semantics: product_slot_index used for multi-product flows. Stages from seed might need set. Unknown.
Also ensureActivity inserts `offboarding_activity_type_id` values null; In other flows the field may be used to identify type; flow list logic may expect activities with these types? They just make generic activity.
Maybe not overdo.
**Tests quality**: The unit tests mock EntityManager entirely and don't exercise repository queries; but they cover service pathways. For SQL bugs in service Draft queries, tests not real.
Let's evaluate outputs vs task instructions: "analyze code changes and produce a structured review plan" with "each issue covers location/nature/impact and tool purpose". It doesn't need final diff issues; issues are risk points detected. We must mention no Markdown headers/code fences. Output lines "Summary:" then "Issues" then numbered.
Use Portuguese pt-BR. Tool calls listed as own lines.
Let's craft issue list, sorted severity high→medium→low. Let's settle reality of issue priorities.
High: actual high-risk potential:
a) **Entity type transition of PercAliment/VrAlim could break consumers reading via typed property int**? Not enough evidence. Focus on high: statuses? If no direct high severe found maybe no high? Hmm review plan should still include severe if plausible.
Let's deeply review possible severe functional bugs in exact code to avoid missing.
#### ExecuteCreateEsocialS2299Draft and flow triggers: It triggers on `employee_enters_stage` in final stage. But if the member in earlier stages has no EsocialS2299? The final stage only. Good.
The action uses `executeNotify` with config to company_member responsible which under the hood sends chat/email. It uses context member id to resolve the member name/email? `array_merge($context, ...)` member_id = employee member -> They override context's member id; But company member is the "employee". Yet they send to company_member responsible. Any substitution of `{{member_name}}` will replace with the *employee*, right? The message: "O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} ..." Context is perhaps built by executeNotify internally derives recipient? In existing code, where call with to company_member? `$context` before includes member_id maybe flow member's company member? Need understand. Since offboarding context, employee is the object. ok.
Actually check tests expect NotificationSpecialist message "Solicitação de desligamento" no link; not assert name, but chatMessage nonnull. fine.
#### `executeNotify` config `'to' => 'company_member', 'company_member_id' => responsible` while `context.member_id` employee, then to company member resolution? Existing uses definitions maybe.
#### Notification HTML link reviewURL:
reviewButtonHtml direct includes reviewUrl after htmlspecialchars OK.
#### Emails could include wrong company member visible. not.
#### `responsible user email` doesn't exist; executeNotify probably handles no user (mailer false in most test cases), but in missing-data test no mailer. In production if responsible has no user, notifications fall back. fine.
#### `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::setPercAliment` new string with percent formatted "12.50"; `applyPayload` obtains `$payload['percAliment']` config default; if value "12,50%" -> stores "12.50" string; esocial XML transform likely expects decimal 12.50. good. previous int expected maybe 12 (percent). Actually percAliment is percent of salary due? value used "12.50" same. old getter int couldn't represent decimal; that may have been bug. PR change fixes.
#### **Callers** with strict types setting integer to setPercAliment now cause TypeError. E.g. controllers that previously stored e.g. `$event->setPercAliment((int)$request... )`? They'd now pass int where ?string expected -> with strict file int to string? Wait function call `setPercAliment($x)` from another file with strict_types=1 where $x integer and method param type string: strict typing in *calling file* applies, so passing int to string-typed parameter of a method defined in another file also errors because strict_types in caller file governs. If old callers pass integer (previously expected int) now TypeError. This is huge! Need find all callers of setPercAliment/setVrAlim (and maybe getters): if any code sends int/float, signature change breaks calls at runtime — high. Tests in this PR probably created only by service set string. Search for setPercAliment callers in entire code; if some with integer, highlight. If mapping has float type, still error. This is an actual potential regression which we can include with code_search.
The signature change from `?int` to `?string` breaks any external callers passing ints (strict file). Similarly getters from int to string could break code strict comparisons, but PHP return string where old callers expected int? Caller just compares, no type. Fine.
Need code_search `setPercAliment|setVrAlim|->getPercAliment|getVrAlim` across code. Tool count: if >100 windows only first 100 still enough. Add file pattern exclude tests? maybe entire.
Also Doctrine property property type mismatch possible.
raise high if callers from e.g. EsocialS2299... mapping controller calling with `int`. In original getter int maybe Twig; set from serialization with int. We include code_search.
#### Another high candidate: New OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService has no DI tags? service autoconfigured public? In config/services yaml refers to `@App\Service\Offboarding\OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService`; class path new. With Symfony default services, private okay. Pass router maybe requires. Uses no interface. Config services adding setter in block; but the service class may require argument router null? services? `config/services.yaml` where new service default autowire picks router based type. fine.
#### **Security: sourceMetadata values may include config attacker?** copy.
#### **Major functional bug candidate**: For actions at line 502, they add `'create_esocial_s2299_draft'` to the action execution map *unconditionally* for any member context; early blocks if source type not offboarding. That's fine.
#### **Trigger restrictions enforcement**: `blocked_triggers` are only available in config file but actual engine in data triggers might not know the action's allowed blocked? If action executed via triggers data flow, it chooses according to action type and allowed triggers validations in existing code. Added test config assures config only. Not a regression.
#### **Logic of payload dates format**: In entity's `dtDeslig` may expect `Y-m-d`; `dateOrNull` returns DateTime. `findExistingEvent` with `dismissalDate->format('Y-m-d')` writes DQL param string to date property; Doctrine accepts for date fields likely. okay.
Let's step to official statuses. Search quickly EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento setStatus in code (other services saveEventS2299). Statuses likely: 'pendente', 'associado', maybe 'enviado'. Need to search for methods setStatus('enviado') in S2299. I don't have execution, but code_search plan can locate statuses. We'll suggest verify.
There is one potential change elsewhere not part files maybe modifies mapping? entities with get/set access.
Now consider scenario of duplicated S-2299 due to officialEvent querying:
- findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal requires `dadosRemuneracao = :remuneracao`. If the same worker changed to a new remuneration record (new id) after event created (e.g. changed salary later), official event would not match new remuneracao, so create another official duplicate? But the query filters on remuneration, so if official earlier event created for old record, new offboarding with newer remuneration may create second. Usually data `dadosRemuneracao` links to current remuneration. Dismissal date may overlap so duplicate same day possible. An S-2299 is per worker & dismissal date, so dedupe should exclude remuneration dimension perhaps. But they intentionally include. Race/edge not high.
Potential Duplicate pending also if dismissalDate changes between default and configured date? configure: pending draft found uses `(dtDeslig = :date OR dtDeslig IS NULL)` — if earlier manual draft has dtDeslig = '2026-09-15' but current offboarding date is later date, then it won't match and creates second event for same employee even if dismissal date was edited later. Because `OR dtDeslig IS NULL`, not `OR dtDeslig < date`. Actually manually created draft with old date won't match. Then create duplicate. Should match by employee/remun regardless of date, updating date and preserve? If old date is a specific dismissal previously planned, but offboarding final action new date, perhaps a second official? Pending duplicates. Test case: "ReusesPendingDraftCreatedOutsideAutomation" has pendingDraft dtDeslig same. It does not test changed date on pending with old non-null date. This is a potentially real bug! The dismissal date in a pending draft should always be overwritten by offboarding truth (source of truth comment) when event linked via metadata; but when it finds an external pending draft for current dismissal they first query official by date; if not found, then query pending by matching `dtDeslig = date OR null`. If a draft was created manually with the same planned date, then matching should update date. If date changed in offboarding (last minute), the old pending draft (non-null) won't be linked; new one created, duplicate. Yet perhaps because mobile date may have been changed after entering final stage; The action may re-run when employee re-enters? Typically, when manager changes dismissal date earlier before stage? Offboarding flows final stage only after outcome; If data changed, action run once only on stage entry. If date was wrong at entry, create draft with date date at time; if later update date, manager manually updates draft via save? The automation says "rascunho atualizado com data de desligamento atual do offboarding... demais preservados" when re-executing. But for manual draft created in UI (saveEventS2299) no metadata link, a date change would duplicate. Actually they deliberately include `dtDeslig IS NULL` case, leaving strict equality; bug candidate medium-low. Tool `file_read_diff`? Service file code search can inspect. We can list as edge case medium.
Maybe test was designed by same PR but existing passed commit reduced context; we have tests: "Reuses draft outside automation" with manual `2026-09-30`, same as current; "OverwritesDismissalDateOnUpdateEvenWhenAlreadyFilled" with metadata linked. It does not cover manual linked different date. Good.
But user said "favor precision, report only likely real". Changing dismissal date after draft entry is likely realistic; manual drafts may have old planned date. However in offboarding closure: entry to final stage triggers on_enter only when sent to finalization; date probably already current. If changed after, maybe exit_date trigger could cause re-execution but action blocked from exit_date. Wait! action blocked triggers include `exit_date` — meaning if the exit_date trigger occurs later (when dismissal date event fires), create action is not allowed. So after finalization draft created with old date, dismissal date cannot be updated by this automation because exit_date blocked from stage? blocked triggers: employee_exit_date? mapped as 'exit_date'; it prevents action from being used with trigger exit_date, but what about a trigger on stage-entry then date manually changed by user afterwards? The draft remains old. This is semantic: action allowed only when employee enters stage. If dismissal date changes after final stage entered (likely workflow stage is last), a new S-2299 with new date? The saved draft may be invalid because date outdated. Hmm but the PR says source truth fields always update when run. But it won't run on exit_date because action blocked? Wait "blocked_triggers: exit_date" means the action cannot be *configured* to run on exit_date; but can run on stage enters. If you update employee info to trigger stage reentry perhaps.
Actually reasons for blocking all triggers except employee_enters_stage: It should fire after final step. If dismissal date (from exit date) is the same. The employee enters final stage maybe before exit date set? If at that time date null, draft created only metadata and notifies with no data. Later data filled and a trigger exit_date fires with same block configured cannot because action not allowed, so final member stuck without draft.
But likely their flow design: stage employee enters finalization is the last manual column; data known before. There might be other automations to save S-2299 not via offboarding. uncertain.
I cannot produce deeply high unverified flaw; we'll not overstate.
Now perhaps strongest high issue is config/services setter. Let's analyze service registration in context: comment shown says "# CRM Automation Service" AFTER added setter with colonless comments; It refers to the next service block. Could the added line be inserted into `App\Service\CrmAutomationService` because prior setters belong to CRM? But CRM automation also maybe set many of those bridge/service setters? Let's use diff context:
```
- [setBpmnCommunicationCenterBridge, ['@App\Service\BpmnCommunicationCenterBridge']]
- [setNotificationsCenterService, ['@App\Service\NotificationsCenterService']]
- [setFinancialFlowAutomationExecutor, ['@App\Service\Products\FinancialFlowAutomationExecutor']]
+ - [setOffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService, ['@App\Service\Offboarding\OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService']]
# CRM Automation Service — explicit logger arg + setter injection for CrmBpmnService
App\Service\CrmAutomationService:
```
This whole block preceding is probably `App\Service\AutomationExecutionService` because AutomationExecutionService has setters for BpmnCommunicationCenterBridge, NotificationCenterService, FinancialFlowAutomationExecutor; its constructor takes only em/client... yes methods shown near additions. Thus correct. no bug. Actually the added methods at 223/226 match. So service wiring fine; no need high.
What else could be high:
- **SetPercAliment callers break** needs code search; likely they might find code that saves old event with floats... This can be a high from signature shift. Let's examine repository's `saveEventS2299` not changed calls setPercAliment from data mapping? Another route may pass `int`. The Entity's previous contract publicly is ?int; this PR silently changes API. Many static analyzers. This comment real.
Search tool plan for:
- `->setPercAliment\(|->setVrAlim\(` across PHP/Twig to find all callers checking argument type.
- `->getPercAliment\(|getVrAlim` for type-sensitive consumers.
- file_read diff entity at all properties maps (file_read_diff of src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php? It only gets diff, no full file). But maybe code_search for `percAliment` in file will show property/attributes around line. Use code_search file patterns. That gives context.
- **Need detect callers** not available now, but plan.
Now decide final issues list (probably 7-9):
1. `[high]` Tipo público do getter/setter alterado de int para string sem atualizar chamadores existentes. In issue: "Mudar assinatura pública das propriedades...". Tool code_search. Use `code_search` for `setPercAliment|setVrAlim|getPercAliment|getVrAlim`. If callers in strict mode pass int/float => fatal.
Also "Se propriedade nativa for `?int` retorno getter type error". Another code_search close.
Maybe we can combine.
2. `[medium]` Non-pendente events statuses like erro/rejeitado treated as non-editable causing inability to correct; verify permitted statuses. code_search. Should severity maybe medium.
3. `[medium]` Offboarding notification may execute with system_sender user-derived config; impersonation risk may affect trusted Adriana conversation. Search producers of system_sender.
4. `[medium]` Seed migration doesn't auto-create future companies (one-time seed) possibly leaving new eligible customers without template. And no test for doc. Tool code_search find how flow_templates normally created after product activation. Medium? Need know. / `file_find` docs database changes.
5. `[medium]` Manual pending draft with old non-null date not found (duplicate) — a bug candidate in date matching. Tool code_search to see other saveEvent and date workflows; in service search.
6. `[medium]` AutomationExecutionService god-object growth. Mention there is now service but orchestration remains in class; regression/maintainability.
7. `[low]` Migration down leaves seeded stages/activities/automations orphan; arguably acceptable. Actually note migrations must be reversible; yes low.
8. `[low]` Rollback/re-run of up can duplicate template due ensureTemplate matching only when seed_migration in settings and ignoring inactive duplicate. But this low because down changes setting. It results in active re-created plus old inactive rows. Many seeds.
9. `[low/medium]` config/services injection registration could be verified— maybe not an "issue", shouldn't list risk low if no real issue. Skip.
10. `[low]` YAML action's config_preset only `to` but has_config false — action fixed receiver; if responsible flow can't resolve no fallback? In service responsible fallback order; if config preset to flow_responsible and flowResponsible null -> fallback offboarding responsible. So fine.
11. `[low]` Test rules: unit tests do not cover SQL DQL/dedup? Could point: tests are mocks no real DB; maybe suggestion tests for stage-entry and duplicate. Optional.
Let's incorporate user-specific concerns properly:
- Migration doc test: Add checking `docs/database-changes/2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template.md` exists via file_find; Could issue "A PR descreve doc da migration, mas ela não aparece no conjunto de alterações em análise; confirmar que está incluída na branch." low.
- Rules for services: We have giant class. Add as first high? "AutomationExecutionService é um god object com 15k lines; PR adding 240 lines..." The user-specific priority strongly asks first. Therefore choose: issue 1 (high) for god object/maintainability? In reviewer output, severity high says system crash/security/data loss. Contradiction. Yet user custom says code review priority; we can make it medium. But user rule says "maior peso". Hmm maybe "high" in their custom sense.
Given that the actual codebase already has the fallback service extraction, perhaps they intend pattern: to use a dedicated service to avoid growing god object. But they still inserted method into huge service because action dispatcher lives there. This is unavoidable in this architecture. Their comment in service: "Centraliza lógica ... evitando duplicar ... dentro do AutomationExecutionService (god object). A orquestração ... permanece no motor". So they acknowledge. Reviewer can still flag but maybe not top-bug. We can make it low-medium? A plan with both high, mediums.
Let's formulate precise issue descriptions:
Issue 1 severity high:
"Alteração da assinatura pública ..."
Location src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php setPercAliment/getVrAlim. Nature: API/contract change in do domínio com dtype novo sem atualizar todos consumidores. Impact: PHP strict type errors when callers int; esocial UI tabs may break. Tool: code_search `->setPercAliment\(|->getPercAliment\(|->setVrAlim\(|->getVrAlim\(` across whole repo to list callers and types; code_search entity file for property declarations with `percAliment` to confirm typed property.
Issue 2 severity high? Actually if issue1 high. Then issue2 maybe medium high?
God object maybe high in user custom. Let's list issue 2 high? "Concentração de lógica ... no serviço gigante". Could be flagged high as architecture critical? Global severity high too strained. Desired max two high. Fine.
No, I will place only true high (type break) high and status medium... Probably okay.
# Let's carefully inspect variables in code around notify perhaps to spot another more material severe bug (regression).
The change replaces `$isPayrollSystemSender` with `$isSystemSender`. In the new code around line 13932:
```
if ($isSystemSender) {
$assistantConversation = getOrCreateAssistantConversation($user);
if (!$assistantConversation) return ['sent'=>false,'error'...];
// send message...
}
```
Need check old branch structure maybe if isSystemSender used to continue remaining.
If user resolves false for responsible with no user? Message not sent. okay.
Now code around line 7039:
```
$emailConfig = ...;
if (filter_var($config['skip_auto_email_template'] ?? false, FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN)) { ... }
```
Email sender system maybe.
Could config `system_sender` become true for payroll too if source set. That extension used by new offboarding action; no.
Could imposter risk moderate.
Now make sure migration of template and action states:
`create_esocial_s2299_draft` automation seed on stage 3 with `nome 'Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299) ao entrar na etapa final'`, triggerType on_enter. In YAML config used by builder allowed trigger known as employee_enters_stage. Existing UI uses triggerType mapping? Migration's automation values likely match datastore triggers, where this is column trigger_type storing 'on_enter'? Existing automations in same file use `'triggerType' => 'on_enter'` among seed. fine.
But the test mapping? stage's automation config include a key `blocks` etc. Let's not.
`ensureAutomation` query matching by name, trigger_type, action_type. If migration is run on a workflow where stage 3 with same exact action and name already exists, skip. fine.
Now claim exact potential on **offboarding data in migrations and multi product**: SQL join does not filter `w.is_active` or company `is_active`. If workflow fluxo-de-saida inactive or no template on some company? consider only workflows with slug regardless is_active maybe creates flow templates for inactive flows; template may show in choice? maybe duplicate global. Low.
Should include? If inactive workflows maybe disabled but seeded nonetheless; templates for ghost flows clutter/odd. But flow templates themselves often use workflow not... Might be fine.
**Multi-tenant isolation in migration**: uses company for each workflow correctly.
Now let's strategize tool plans:
- code_search supports `search_text`, not special functions by arg. On plan arrow line: `→ code_search search_text='setPercAliment\(|setVrAlim\(|getPercAliment\(|getVrAlim\(' file_patterns=['*.php', ':(exclude)*Test.php'] use_perl_regexp=true — lista chamadores...`
- code_search in file `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php` search `percAliment|vrAlim` to see mapping/typed declarations.
- code_search service registration: `search_text='setFinancialFlowAutomationExecutor|AutomationExecutionService|CrmAutomationService' file_patterns=['config/services.yaml'] use_perl_regexp...` Actually search exact lines near; or file_read_diff on config/services.yaml plus file pattern. Use file_read_diff path config/services.yaml. To see preceding service definition names? But diff only has changed lines with 4 lines context. It shows context includes comment above but the service header might be some lines above not enough. code_search file full catches service header; search lines around setters in file:
search_text `setBpmnCommunicationCenterBridge` file_patterns ['config/services.yaml'] returns first occurrences with nearby? code_search output isn't context-like; it shows line containing search with only line. Could use file_read_diff config/services.yaml (context only) to decide. Already we have. Plan code_search service setters to find preceding service; similarly file_find maybe list manifests.
- code_search system_sender: search all code file for term to identify UI/controllers that can set.
- code_search status set: `setStatus\('(?!pendente)` per Perl with excluded? include file patterns 'src/Service/Esocial/*'? We don't know path. Maybe file_find for "EsocialS2299" in src to locate save services? query `EsocialS2299` path and files. & code_search `setStatus\('enviado'\)|setStatus\('erro'\)|setStatus\('rejeitado'\)`.
- plan for draft date duplicate: code_search in service file `findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal|dtDeslig = :dismissalDate` maybe see exact.
- god object size search: Search count with perl regex `function\s+(public|private|protected)`? limited to first 100; but enough show >100 even.
For migration doc, use file_find `2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template.md` or docs/database-changes.
Tool call formatting:
`→ code_search search_text='...' file_patterns=['...'] use_perl_regexp=true — motivo`.
Each issue has at least maybe one.
No actual execution; output only plan.
Need Summary in Portuguese:
"PR ... busca preparar automaticamente evento S-2299..."
Then Issues numbering. Try to order statuses to reflect user priorities but still high/medium/low. A good plan:
1. high — signature typed break.
2. high? god object: user rules place highest. Wait maybe put god object issue no.1 because asked "Se este arquivo já é grande... qualquer aumento dessa mistura... é o achado mais importante." This is a custom instruction from user rules, should override generic severity definitions? "Prioridade da revisão (nesta ordem): 1. God object...". It says any increase is most important. Use high severity. It might not align functional blocking but user forces.
Add after first line description (not name), details later.
Then 2 high? type? If issue #1 high god object. issue #2 high type break. But sort: two high then mediums.
But quality: high for God Object deviating severity definitions; risk from code review team instructions unlikely. I'd put issue #1 high regardless, but in output can include both high. Description of #1 must simple first sentence; naming "AutomationExecutionService"... The example high for class. Could explain "O serviço central de automações já concentra mais de 14 mil linhas...". Wait line numbers appeared 14920 to 14930 and file 15k; search result line likely more 15k. Use not claim exact 14k? The new method line ~14930 and central action switch existed at 502; file at least 15k. We can say "já passando de 15 mil linhas".
Actually Output severity comment: "código novo de orquestração colocado no god object aumenta..." Provide impact maintenance (and regression). Suggest: extrair método de ação em classe que implementa interface etc, including less notification error. A class already exists for dataset build, orchestration remains.
Now issue of end-to-end to look line "System-specific rules service-specific": "Esta mudança é feita no contexto action map and executeAction; test also requires all automations ...". We'll list tools to verify full action dispatcher not all; no tool needed? plan code_search to identify how actions are registered `'create_esocial_s2299_draft'` other places? Could check if UI/builder requires listing type elsewhere e.g. action type validation in flow templates. If the action id "create_esocial_s2299_draft" must also be registered in allowed action types of product; search action types YAML/UI configs. user concerns: config/automations offboarding only; frontend lists action types based IDs? Not needed.
Issue #3 maybe combine with #2? Let's list issues:
1 high God-object (specific user)
2 high signature contract (TypeError)
3 medium system_sender trusted-context from generic config should verify.
4 medium officialEvent status semantics; "erro/rejeitado" can block corrected draft.
5 medium manual pending draft handling ignores old date non-null duplicate
6 medium registration setter wiring check
7 medium migration coverage issue "one-time seed; docs; etc" Hmm too many.
Need not produce all to avoid speculative noise.
Medium/lows:
- "Migration fecha no commit..." wait.
- A migration seeds data only in companies already able; new tenants depend. That is known design when using migration. In feature-offboarding template seeds, flow template creation likely currently happens through UI in company after enabling. But if offer standard template only migration no coverage future. Need evidence: other standard flow templates are created automatically on company onboarding maybe through event listener. Search "seed_migration" patterns probably they've done similar; previous seed migrations may use event subscriptions. Most likely product activation invokes seed. Unknown. Tool plan: `code_search 'seed_migration' in migrations` to identify previous similar; plus query against Service? maybe. Might avoid not real.
- Docs file check low: Use review group? It's real because requirement says file created, but changed list missing. We can note documentation file should be in diff; check file exists in project via file_find. low.
- Down leaves child rows low.
- If yaml keys: no issue.
Use severity "medium" issue 6 "wiring no config/services.yaml". Let's see: if services registration line around 1494 and added under automation block correct. Even if correct, not an issue. So keep out.
Potential duplicate event manual date - because there is comment "evita S-2299 duplicado", but mismatch case shows. Include medium, with tools.
Now think about #2 high phrase clarity:
"Alterar o tipo das propriedades ... de int para string quebra todos os pontos antigos que escrevem valores numéricos..." Need mention escopo & impact.
Potential response: they searched no callers; still if no callers no issue. We will plan.
Now craft #1 exactly with "AutomationExecutionService". First phrase no method names:
"O serviço central de automação já é um objeto gigante com mais de dez mil linhas; adicionar mais um comando..." simple. Then impact.
Potential duplicative #5 exact technique:
`findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal` adds param but excludes manual draft if date differs. line in service.
Maybe user rule for Repository focus status? okay.
What tools per issue:
#1 God: code_search line count? maybe not, tool maybe to find `private function` first 100 count and action consumers; but not necessary. If we want plan:
→ code_search `private function` file_patterns ['src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php'] — confirm volume; plus code_search `executeAction` in controllers console etc.
But tool mention "descrever intenção". Up to lines.
#2:
→ code_search for set/ get methods as above; → code_search `percAliment|vrAlim` in src/Entity to inspect typed declaration.
#3:
→ code_search `system_sender` across code to inventory sources. file patterns include `*.php`, `*.yaml`, `*.twig` to see config.
#4:
→ code_search `setStatus\(` within EsocialS2299 repo service paths? first file_find services path? Use `file_find 'S2299'` to locate save event. Then code_search for status literals in those.
Better: file_find query_name `S2299` returns classes/service; then code_search `setStatus\('[^']+'\)`.
#5:
→ code_search in service for `findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal|dtDeslig` and `saveEventS2299`; use file_find.
But maybe over-demand.
#Low migration down & doc:
Use file_read_diff of migration (we already have diff) no tools. But to verify one-time seed mechanism use code_search `seed_migration` in migrations/services to see how this standard flow template distributed to newly subscribing company; perhaps issue 5 merged with migration. We can combine migration issues into one medium issue each maybe.
Let's not exceed 8.
Let's inspect stronger migration danger details:
**In down():**
```
if ($offboardingProductId > 0 && ($settings['workflow_product_was_created'] ?? false) === true ... ) {
DELETE wp FROM workflow_products wp WHERE wp.product_id = ... and wp.workflow_id = (SELECT ft.workflow_id FROM flow_templates ft WHERE ft.id = :templateId)
AND NOT EXISTS (...)
}
...
UPDATE flow_templates SET is_active = 0 ...
```
If `settings` row decoded but missing `workflow_product_was_created`, default false, they leave workflow_products; ok.
But end: if `$templateRows` obtained based on `settings` JSON with seed. Ensures delete product link before deactivating to pass NOT EXISTS check if another active template still references product. Good.
But if multiple templateRows for different companies, deleting workflow product may remove link that one template created and another active template still references `product` within same workflow but inactive? `active_ft` check only active different; good.
**Up() missing company filter inside template selection:** new template every workflow. no company duplicates? A company could have multiple workflows slug fluxo-de-saida? The query selects all workflows slug, maybe more than one; it seeds each with same template name; each flow_template belongs workflow. Good.
**A business-critical regression from using default automation config in migration:** Stage 2 automation "Avançar ao concluir 100% das atividades" triggers all_complete? This is included in flow template "Etapa 2 - Transição" move to finalization. If a user has no activity completed? no.
Actually flow automation seed for stage 3 on_offboarding_complete action type 'create_processo_seletivo' to recruitment; It breaks isolation across products: offboarding flow moving to final with create_processo seletivo. There action's `executeCreateProcessoSeletivo` may require a recruitment/hiring product and should avoid if product unavailable. Existing class handles. not.
No need.
YAML key spelling: Test only checks allowed_triggers/blocked triggers. Nothing.
Let's get to output.
Sort high:
1. God object expansion (user...), description.
2. Signature type break.
3.+ medium...
Maybe #3 is system_sender trust issue maybe just medium. #4 idempotence statuses as medium or maybe high? If blocked due "enviado" definitely intended to prevent edit of official. If status includes "erro" then a rejected S2299 may be required corrections; S-2299 uses specific procedure not editing same. But draft recreate maybe no need. Keep medium.
One thing I should verify #4 status actual: The event created by service set status `'pendente'`. Existing official events likely status set elsewhere 'enviado', 'erro', 'rejeitado', 'concluido' etc. What other codes call it:
- Esocial events status could be 'processado', 'enviado', 'agenado', 'recusado' strings.
If official query `status != 'pendente'` includes any legacy event with status null? it won't detect null. That nuance also.
Source methods:
- If no esocial worker data, method still notification simply draft only. okay.
One more high risk: **`$event` used when event found linked to offboarding but is official**: eventStatus existing_not_editable; but the function does not set `dadosRemuneracao`. no.
Wait try to find a real PHP error in new method:
```
$metadata = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? [];
if (!is_array($metadata)) { $metadata = []; }
```
they redefine. no.
`$event->setDadosRemuneracao($remuneracao);` — method name setDadosRemuneracao? likely exists but Old Entity? test does not call? Yes event creation and this call occurs; if no method -> error tests would fail. fine.
`$event->getStatus() !== 'pendente'` — maybe values `pending`. test fixture official sets.
`$draftService->findEventLinkedToOffboarding(...)` looks in sourceMetadata event id. In **second flush**, they set event id but the code before the notification uses `$event?->getId()` not null. Then persists member metadata only after the event persisted & flushed. Good.
`findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal` query params as value `$dismissalDate->format('Y-m-d')` for a Date column; comparing date field to string via parameter works (DBAL). yes.
`findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal` OR nullable params fine.
Now about `getOffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService` - constructor first parameter `EntityManagerInterface`; fallback also uses router property type `?RouterInterface`. fine.
Wait `AutomationExecutionService` uses property `private ?\App\Service\Offboarding\OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService $...` with FQCN in doc? Actual property typed with `?\App\Service...`; valid. The setter method param typed same. okay.
One coding issue: instead of import at top uses FQCN repeatedly; imported `use App\Entity...` only; not issue.
**Now `system_sender` config can only be set in flow automation config UI for all notifications**. The new YAML action preset only `to`. The config in migration sets no system_sender because execution hardcodes. `executeCreate...` passes it. Other action config containing send notifications doesn't include system_sender normally, because channel code gets only if config has field; a malicious/no... If user saves arbitrary JSON stored in DB, all configs subject to user input. But if UI does not expose `system_sender` at all, users can't normally set except DB manipulation; and even admins have full DB access. Maybe not an attack but helpful internal. Could just treat medium as "generalizing to all notif config makes payback leak: any new notification action now must consider system_sender, the old restriction only for payroll automatic via source; business could unknowingly override." Not good.
Better focus is less speculative: The system_sender route to fallback direct conversation means **if a normal send_notification action accidentally sets system_sender (copy/paste config), chat messages no longer appear as originating member; changing visible sender identity is material. Medium**.
Ok.
Now if no issue truly needs "file_read_diff", but tools in plan allowed in descriptions mention not invoked. Good.
Write output Summary in Portuguese concise.
Issues numbered continuous overall sorted high→medium→low. We can have two highs, four mediums, 2 lows.
Let's lay out:
1 high:
"O arquivo central de automação... aumentado..."
Location path and new lines.
Impact maintenance, regressions.
Tools maybe code_search `function ` count/paths? yes:
`→ code_search search_text='function ' file_patterns=['src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php'] use_perl_regexp=false — contabilizar tamanho ...`
But search function returns first 100; pointless and no line numbers if "function " occurrences under 100? File 15k returns >100 with exactly first 100 matches; still support.
`→ code_search search_text='executeAction' file_patterns=['tests/', 'src/'] use_perl_regexp=false`? not helpful if not enumerate all call paths. maybe only one line.
Maybe issue #1 no tools? Yet user put high system priority; they might expect tool planning. Describe need to see available action pattern extensibility: code_search for other new services. Add one tool. Fine.
2 high type:
as above.
3 medium "official event statuses broad":
Description: "Qualquer evento com status diferente de 'pendente' é tratado como oficial inalterável; se existirem no domínio status de erro/recusa etc. responsável fica sem retomar alteração no fluxo, apenas aviso." Locational. Need searches.
4 medium "manual drafts case...": Actually title no jargon. Search.
5 medium "'system_sender' para mensagens 'Adriana' liberado para qualquer config de automação..." Locational. tool.
6 medium "Ajuste na consulta de evento ligado ao metadata do fluxo pode escolher/atualizar um rascunho antigo de outro offboarding caso 'offboardingMemberId' não for setado nunca..." Wait `findEventLinkedToOffboarding` returns null unless metadata matches member id. If two offboarding flows same worker concurrently (offboarding while another active?) Old draft official, new offboarding sees etc. no.
Alternative #6 medium: "Migration seed exclusivo para empresas atuais" needs maybe false assumption; Could omit.
Low 6 "migration down/template etc. rollback leaves rows." Include.
Low 7 "docs migration outside review need check." Include via file_find.
Should #6 medium include "no test for real query/persistence; DQL date not executed by unit test; nor migration"? Maybe plan issue (medium):
"Os testes novos simulam repositorios com mocks e não validam as queries de deduplicação..." But global test guidance says missing tests signal if changed behavior no test. There is extensive test. Mention no test finds missing "manual pending old date"; Already issue #4. Avoid.
Let's phrase #4 / #5 carefully to not duplicate exact same edge.
Maybe include nothing #4 "dedupe query not distinguishing `null dtDeslig`..." The OR clause: if dismissalDate exists, query pending WHERE (date=X OR dtDeslig IS NULL). If two pending drafts (one null, one with X), sorted by event.id DESC might return the null-date draft; event updated with setDtDeslig X (force) yes fine. If one old date Y, not matched -> duplicate; That's one. If pending draft with date Y also another official with date Y? official already has old date. Anyway.
Medium #5 update old manually draft with different date -> "Rascunhos manuais antigos (fora automação) com data antiga provavelmente..." Need not be high.
Now tool #5:
`→ code_search search_text='saveEventS2299' file_patterns=['src/'] — localizar fluxos manuais...`.
Then `→ code_search search_text='findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal|dtDeslig = :dismissalDate OR event.dtDeslig IS NULL'...` Wait code_search cannot find regex across lines; but current file in diff. Might use file_read_diff? no. To verify how manual drafts save date from controllers. Use file_find for `*S2299*` in src/Repository & Service, plus `code_search 'dtDeslig' files.
#6 system_sender.
Tool:
→ code_search `system_sender` across all `src/config` to list controllers/templates.
#Migration low:
Up/down detailed issue phrased "rollback inativo mas não apaga..." severity low.
Tool: file_read_diff migration path to re-check as plan? already diff. Could attach no tools, but "issue needs no tool verify". Or tool to check constraints? flow_automations FK cascade to template? There may be no FK. Use file_find FlowTemplateRepository? Not.
Let's include no tools for that? The instructions if no tool verification omit arrows.
Docs low:
→ file_find `2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template` under docs to confirm.
High #1 and #2 ordering: God issue maybe belongs first due user order. Keep.
Are there more medium issues maybe we should include:
Medium: **construir evento/automatizar during `up` only if company workflow 'fluxo-de-saida' has exact slug *and* package feature; but if workflow is custom per company slug fluxo-de-saida different? product flow is tied to fixed slug. Probably yes.
Medium: config/services setter verify as actual plan issue? no.
Now #high 2 wording. Ensure first phrase no method names:
"Alterar o tipo aceito e devolvido por ...". Phrase uses names after. Good.
Line requirements: Each issue paragraph then arrows. Keep compact.
Let's create final response in pt-BR but tool args like search_text are content; no code fences.
Make sure arrows tool names correct code_search/file_find/file_read_diff. Mention use_perl_regexp etc.
Potential concern: code_search `search_text='setPercAliment\(|setVrAlim\('` use_perl_regexp true required. mention.
Additional issues need mention actions on tools not invoked.
Ok final.
Summary: A PR integra a criação/atualização do rascunho do evento eSocial S-2299 ao fluxo de offboarding, adicionando a action `create_esocial_s2299_draft`, um serviço dedicado para montar/buscar/persistir o rascunho, uma migration que semeia o template padrão “Offboarding com eSocial (S-2299)” em empresas elegíveis, um ajuste no envio de notificações para suportar remetente “sistema/Adriana” e testes de unidade/configuração.
Issues
1. [high] O serviço central de automação já é um objeto gigante com mais de dez mil linhas, e esta PR adiciona um novo comando com cerca de 240 linhas de orquestração nesse mesmo arquivo, misturando resolução de responsável, regras de negócio, persistência, notificação e auditoria. Isso aumenta o risco de regressões em cadeia e dificulta testar o comportamento como um fluxo único; o serviço extraído concentra só a montagem da entidade, mas a decisão de qual evento usar e o que notificar continua no “god object”. Convém mover toda a orquestração do novo comando para um service próprio que receba o contexto do fluxo e devolva o resultado.
→ code_search search_text='function ' file_patterns=['src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php'] — dimensionar o total de métodos do service e justificar a necessidade de extração
→ code_search search_text='executeAction|create_esocial_s2299_draft' file_patterns=['src/','config/'] — mapear como a action é registrada e quais caminhos chamam o dispatcher antes de decidir onde extrair
2. [high] Alterar o tipo público das propriedades de alimentação de inteiro para string quebra o contrato de todas as chamadas antigas que gravam ou comparam esses valores como número. Quem ainda chama `setPercAliment()` ou `setVrAlim()` passando inteiro/flutuante em arquivo com `strict_types=1` passará a receber TypeError em runtime, e leituras que assumiam inteiro (cálculos, Twig, exportações) podem mudar de comportamento silenciosamente. Antes de manter a alteração, é necessário garantir que todos os consumidores antigos foram migrados ou receberam conversão.
→ code_search search_text='setPercAliment\(|setVrAlim\(|getPercAliment\(|getVrAlim\(' use_perl_regexp=true file_patterns=['*.php', ':(exclude)*Test.php', '*.twig'] — listar chamadores existentes e o tipo de valor que cada um passa/espera
→ code_search search_text='percAliment|vrAlim' file_patterns=['src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php'] — conferir se a propriedade mapeada pelo Doctrine também mudou ou se o getter agora devolve string a partir de propriedade tipada como int, o que causaria TypeError em toda leitura
3. [medium] Na busca pelo evento oficial, qualquer status diferente de “pendente” é tratado como “já enviado e não editável”. Se o domínio tiver estados como erro, recusa ou rejeição — em que o desligamento precisa ser corrigido ou regerado — o offboarding vai apenas avisar que existe um evento oficial e bloquear a criação de um rascunho correto, levando o responsável a um beco sem saída operacional. É preciso confirmar quais status existem para S-2299 e restringir a trava apenas aos estados realmente definitivos.
→ code_search search_text="setStatus\('[^']+'\)" use_perl_regexp=true file_patterns=['src/'] — levantar todos os status possíveis gravados em eventos eSocial S-2299
→ file_find query_name='S2299' — localizar services/controllers de envio e correção do evento para entender o ciclo de vida dos status
4. [medium] A lógica de reaproveitamento de rascunho pendente só encontra um rascunho manual quando a data gravada nele é igual à data atual do offboarding ou quando está vazia; se o responsável criou um rascunho manual com a data antiga e a data de desligamento mudou depois, a automação não vincula esse rascunho e cria um segundo S-2299 para o mesmo colaborador — exatamente o cenário de duplicidade que a PR diz evitar. A busca deveria casar por colaborador/remuneração e deixar que a data do offboarding seja o campo sobrescrito, como já acontece no caso de evento vinculado por metadata.
→ code_search search_text='findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal|dtDeslig = :dismissalDate' file_patterns=['src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php'] use_perl_regexp=true — revisar o critério de casamento do rascunho manual
→ code_search search_text='saveEventS2299|setDtDeslig' file_patterns=['src/'] — entender onde rascunhos manuais recebem data e com que frequência a data pode divergir da atual do offboarding
5. [medium] O novo campo `system_sender` torna qualquer automação de notificação capaz de emitir mensagens na conversa da assistente “Adriana” (usuário nulo), inclusive ações que não são originadas pelo sistema. Se esse campo estiver sujeito à configuração gravada por um usuário/cliente na montagem do fluxo, um membro com permissão de editar automações pode se passar pela assistente oficial dentro da própria empresa, comprometendo a confiança do canal e permitindo phishing interno. Convém restringir o `system_sender` a configurações internas validadas no backend, não a um campo aberto no JSON de qualquer action.
→ code_search search_text='system_sender' file_patterns=['src/','config/','templates/','assets/'] — mapear todas as origens possíveis do campo para saber se ele é editável por usuário ou apenas injetado por código interno
6. [medium] A migration semeia o template apenas para empresas que já são elegíveis no momento da execução; empresas que contratarem o pacote offboarding ou habilitarem a feature depois da migration ficam sem o fluxo padrão “Offboarding com eSocial (S-2299)”, porque o seed roda uma única vez. Se a criação de template para novos clientes não estiver coberta por outro mecanismo do produto, a entrega fica incompleta justamente para os clientes mais recentes.
→ code_search search_text='seed_migration' file_patterns=['migrations/','src/'] — verificar se existe mecanismo complementar que cria templates padrão quando a empresa passa a ser elegível
→ file_find query_name='CompanyAppVisibility|FlowTemplate' — localizar o fluxo de ativação de produto para confirmar se o template é recriado nesse caminho
7. [low] O `down()` da migration desativa o template, mas não remove as etapas, atividades, automações e vínculos de produto que ficaram gravados; em um rollback seguido de novo `up()`, o template antigo continua no banco e um novo é criado, acumulando linhas órfãs e duplicando o seed. Como os dados são irreversíveis em parte, o `down()` deveria ao menos registrar/limpar os registros filhos ou o `up()` deveria reconciliar templates inativos antes de inserir.
→ file_read_diff path_array=['migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php'] — reler o down e o up para validar se uma reexecução após rollback acumula registros órfãos
8. [low] A documentação da migration (`docs/database-changes/2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template.md`) é citada na descrição, mas não aparece no conjunto de alterações aqui em análise; como a regra do repositório exige documentação de seed/schema na própria PR, é preciso confirmar que o arquivo está mesmo incluído na branch de destino.
→ file_find query_name='2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template' — confirmar a existência do arquivo de documentação no projeto/diff
main_task
Request #1
deepseek-v4-flash
P:43.68K C:642 CR:2.69K CW:0
6160ms
Reasoning
Let me start by understanding the task. I need to review the code changes in the review_files. The review plan already lists issues to verify. Let me work through them systematically using the tools.
Let me start by gathering context. I'll do several searches in parallel:
1. Dimension the AutomationExecutionService (methods count).
2. Find callers of setPercAliment/setVrAlim and getters.
3. Check the entity property mapping for percAliment/vrAlim.
4. Look at S2299 statuses.
Let me first read the files. Let me begin.
Let me search for the relevant things.
Key issues to verify:
1. [high] God object - AutomationExecutionService adding ~240 lines of orchestration. Already big.
2. [high] Type change from int to string on getPercAliment/setPercAliment etc. Need to check the property type in the entity and Doctrine mapping. If property is still `?int`, returning `?string` type would be a TypeError.
3. [medium] Event official status check: `status != 'pendente'` means any non-pending treated as non-editable. Need to check statuses.
4. [medium] findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal matches on date equality or null; if manual draft has old date, may create duplicate.
5. [medium] system_sender new field - is it user-editable?
6. [medium] Migration seeds only eligible companies at migration time; new companies don't get the template.
7. [low] down() doesn't remove child records.
8. [low] Doc file missing from diff.
Let me check the entity file first to verify property types.
Let me do parallel calls:
- file_read on src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php around percAliment property.
- code_search for setPercAliment( callers.
- code_search for getPercAliment( callers.
Let me start.
Vou analisar as mudanças em profundidade, começando por coletar contexto sobre os pontos levantados no plano de revisão.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php", "start_line": 1, "end_line": 260}
Result
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php (Total lines: 335)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-260
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Entity;
4|
5|use App\Repository\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository;
6|use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
7|
8|/**
9| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass=EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::class)
10| */
11|class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento extends EsocialEvents
12|{
13| /**
14| * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="EsocialDadosTrabalhador")
15| * @ORM\JoinColumn(name="esocial_dados_trabalhador_id", referencedColumnName="id", nullable=false)
16| */
17| private $esocialTrabalhador;
18|
19| /**
20| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=2, nullable=true)
21| */
22| private $mtvDeslig;
23|
24| /**
25| * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
26| */
27| private $dtDeslig;
28|
29| /**
30| * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
31| */
32| private $dtAvPrv;
33|
34| /**
35| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=1, nullable=true)
36| */
37| private $indPagtoApi;
38|
39| /**
40| * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
41| */
42| private $dtProjFimApi;
43|
44| /**
45| * @ORM\Column(type="integer", nullable=true)
46| */
47| private $pensAlim;
48|
49| /**
50| * @ORM\Column(type="decimal", precision=10, scale=2, nullable=true)
51| */
52| private $percAliment;
53|
54| /**
55| * @ORM\Column(type="decimal", precision=10, scale=2, nullable=true)
56| */
57| private $vrAlim;
58|
59| /**
60| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=20, nullable=true)
61| */
62| private $nrProcTrab;
63|
64| /**
65| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=1, nullable=true)
66| */
67| private $indPdv;
68|
69| /**
70| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=11, nullable=true)
71| */
72| private $cpfSubstituto;
73|
74| /**
75| * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
76| */
77| private $dtNascto;
78|
79| /**
80| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=11, nullable=true)
81| */
82| private $novoCpf;
83|
84| /**
85| * @ORM\Column(type="integer", nullable=true)
86| */
87| private $indRemun;
88|
89| /**
90| * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
91| */
92| private $dtFimRemun;
93|
94| /**
95| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=5, nullable=true)
96| */
97| private $insConsig;
98|
99| /**
100| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=40, nullable=true)
101| */
102| private $nrContr;
103|
104| /**
105| * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity=EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class, )
106| * @ORM\JoinColumn(nullable=false)
107| */
108| private $dadosRemuneracao;
109|
110| public function getDadosRemuneracao(): ?EsocialDadosRemuneracao
111| {
112| return $this->dadosRemuneracao;
113| }
114|
115| public function setDadosRemuneracao(?EsocialDadosRemuneracao $dadosRemuneracao): self
116| {
117| $this->dadosRemuneracao = $dadosRemuneracao;
118|
119| return $this;
120| }
121|
122| public function getEsocialTrabalhador()
123| {
124| return $this->esocialTrabalhador;
125| }
126|
127| public function setEsocialTrabalhador(?EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador): void
128| {
129| $this->esocialTrabalhador = $esocialTrabalhador;
130| }
131|
132| public function getMtvDeslig(): ?string
133| {
134| return $this->mtvDeslig;
135| }
136|
137| public function setMtvDeslig(?string $mtvDeslig): self
138| {
139| $this->mtvDeslig = $mtvDeslig;
140|
141| return $this;
142| }
143|
144| public function getDtDeslig(): ?\DateTimeInterface
145| {
146| return $this->dtDeslig;
147| }
148|
149| public function setDtDeslig(?\DateTimeInterface $dtDeslig): self
150| {
151| $this->dtDeslig = $dtDeslig;
152|
153| return $this;
154| }
155|
156| public function getDtAvPrv(): ?\DateTimeInterface
157| {
158| return $this->dtAvPrv;
159| }
160|
161| public function setDtAvPrv(?\DateTimeInterface $dtAvPrv): self
162| {
163| $this->dtAvPrv = $dtAvPrv;
164|
165| return $this;
166| }
167|
168| public function getIndPagtoApi(): ?string
169| {
170| return $this->indPagtoApi;
171| }
172|
173| public function setIndPagtoApi(?string $indPagtoApi): self
174| {
175| $this->indPagtoApi = $indPagtoApi;
176|
177| return $this;
178| }
179|
180| public function getDtProjFimApi(): ?\DateTimeInterface
181| {
182| return $this->dtProjFimApi;
183| }
184|
185| public function setDtProjFimApi(?\DateTimeInterface $dtProjFimApi): self
186| {
187| $this->dtProjFimApi = $dtProjFimApi;
188|
189| return $this;
190| }
191|
192| public function getPensAlim(): ?int
193| {
194| return $this->pensAlim;
195| }
196|
197| public function setPensAlim(?int $pensAlim): self
198| {
199| $this->pensAlim = $pensAlim;
200|
201| return $this;
202| }
203|
204| public function getPercAliment(): ?string
205| {
206| return $this->percAliment;
207| }
208|
209| public function setPercAliment(?string $percAliment): self
210| {
211| $this->percAliment = $percAliment;
212|
213| return $this;
214| }
215|
216| public function getVrAlim(): ?string
217| {
218| return $this->vrAlim;
219| }
220|
221| public function setVrAlim(?string $vrAlim): self
222| {
223| $this->vrAlim = $vrAlim;
224|
225| return $this;
226| }
227|
228| public function getNrProcTrab(): ?string
229| {
230| return $this->nrProcTrab;
231| }
232|
233| public function setNrProcTrab(?string $nrProcTrab): self
234| {
235| $this->nrProcTrab = $nrProcTrab;
236|
237| return $this;
238| }
239|
240| public function getIndPdv(): ?string
241| {
242| return $this->indPdv;
243| }
244|
245| public function setIndPdv(?string $indPdv): self
246| {
247| $this->indPdv = $indPdv;
248|
249| return $this;
250| }
251|
252| public function getCpfSubstituto(): ?string
253| {
254| return $this->cpfSubstituto;
255| }
256|
257| public function setCpfSubstituto(?string $cpfSubstituto): self
258| {
259| $this->cpfSubstituto = $cpfSubstituto;
260|
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "setPercAliment\\(|setVrAlim\\(|getPercAliment\\(|getVrAlim\\(", "use_perl_regexp": true, "file_patterns": ["*.php", "*.twig"]}
Result
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
Match lines: 4
204| public function getPercAliment(): ?string
209| public function setPercAliment(?string $percAliment): self
216| public function getVrAlim(): ?string
221| public function setVrAlim(?string $vrAlim): self
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino.php
Match lines: 4
112| public function getPercAliment(): ?int
117| public function setPercAliment(?int $percAliment): self
124| public function getVrAlim(): ?int
129| public function setVrAlim(?int $vrAlim): self
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
Match lines: 4
81| $event->setPercAliment($data['percAliment'] ?? null);
82| $event->setVrAlim($data['vrAlim'] ?? null);
122| 'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),
123| 'vrAlim' => $event->getVrAlim(),
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2399EvtTsvTerminoRepository.php
Match lines: 4
78| $event->setPercAliment($data['percentualPensao']);
79| $event->setVrAlim($data['valorPensao']);
109| 'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),
110| 'vrAlim' => $event->getVrAlim(),
File: src/Service/ESocialDataService.php
Match lines: 4
1078| $std->percaliment = $evento->getPercAliment();
1079| $std->vralim = $evento->getVrAlim();
1330| $std->percaliment = $evento->getPercAliment();
1331| $std->vralim = $evento->getVrAlim();
File: src/Service/FlowableServices/FlowableVariablesService.php
Match lines: 4
19737| 'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),
19738| 'vrAlim' => $event->getVrAlim(),
19792| 'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),
19793| 'vrAlim' => $event->getVrAlim(),
File: src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php
Match lines: 2
69| $this->applyPayloadValue(fn () => $event->getPercAliment(), fn ($value) => $event->setPercAliment($value), $this->decimalOrNull($payload['percAliment'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
70| $this->applyPayloadValue(fn () => $event->getVrAlim(), fn ($value) => $event->setVrAlim($value), $this->decimalOrNull($payload['vrAlim'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
File: tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php
Match lines: 1
188| self::assertSame('12.50', $event->getPercAliment());
Request #2
deepseek-v4-flash
P:47.25K C:4.42K CR:44.29K CW:0
33142ms
Reasoning
The entity property `percAliment` is `@ORM\Column(type="decimal", precision=10, scale=2, nullable=true)` — an untyped private property (private $percAliment). With decimal type, Doctrine returns string in PHP by default (for Doctrine DBAL, decimal columns come back as strings unless using a custom type). So changing the getter/setter type from ?int to ?string is actually the correct type for a decimal Doctrine column, because Doctrine hydrates decimal columns as strings.
But wait — this changes the public contract. Old callers:
- src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php: setPercAliment($data['percAliment'] ?? null) — the value from $data is request data (strings). This is fine now; previously with ?int, passing a numeric string would be coerced only if strict_types=1 not enabled... but the repository file—let's check its strict_types declaration. Actually repository passes $data values (which could be numeric strings) - previously that would throw TypeError in strict mode if the file has strict_types=1. Wait actually the earlier code compiled? Let me think. Actually with non-strict types, "12.5" would be coerced to int 12. With strict_types, it would throw. The repository file previously did `$event->setPercAliment($data['percAliment'] ?? null)` and the original setter was `?int`. So if data came as string "12.5", in non-strict mode it'd coerce to 12, losing precision — a bug! This PR changes it to ?string, which matches the decimal DBAL column (strings). That seems like a bugfix, not a bug.
But are there old callers that pass actual ints? Let me search more broadly. Also EsocialDataService uses getters to assign to std class for XML serialization. Decimal columns return strings in Doctrine, so assigning to std->percaliment as a string... If the XML requires numeric format, then the value formatting must handle it. Since previously, before this PR, getPercAliment() declared ?int return type but the property is decimal (string from DBAL). When hydrating from DB, `$this->percAliment` would be string "12.50". Returning a string from a method declared `: ?int` would throw TypeError "Return value must be of type ?int, string returned"! So actually the old code was broken for reading records from DB — unless there's a custom type or the property hydration converts. Hmm, but wait, Doctrine decimal columns: for MySQL with DBAL, decimal type returns string. So `getPercAliment(): ?int` on a hydrated entity whose property contains "12.50" would cause a TypeError. So the original code likely never worked when reading from DB, OR Doctrine converts decimal to float? No—Doctrine DBAL returns decimal as string by default.
Actually, let's not overthink. The change to ?string is likely a genuine bugfix aligning type with Doctrine decimal. So this "issue 2" from the plan may be a false positive — actually the change looks correct. Let me verify who else calls setPercAliment with an int. In the S2299 repository, the values come from request data `$data['percAliment']`, typically numeric strings from a form. That's consistent with string now. Good.
But wait — callers using strict_types with a true int? None found besides tests. EsocialS2399EvtTsvTerminoRepository passes $data['percentualPensao'] to a different entity (still ?int there). No cross-call.
FlowableVariablesService reads getPercAliment and puts into arrays for flowable variables — fine with string.
ESocialDataService serializes to XML — a numeric string "12.50" is valid XML content. Actually for percaliment the eSocial schema expects decimal. A string "12.50" is fine.
So issue 2 is likely not a real bug — it's actually fixing an inconsistency (returning ?int from a decimal column would be a runtime error on read). Hmm, but wait—were records ever read? The entity existed and presumably events were read somewhere, so maybe Doctrine actually returns decimal as string and the old `?int` getter was never called on records with non-null values... Or maybe the values were stored as null only. Anyway, given the review principle to only report real defects, I should be careful about raising the type change as a bug. Since the property is decimal, and the repository now also fixes setIndPagtoApi null handling. The type change appears to be a correctness fix rather than a regression. I'll not raise it as a blocking finding, or perhaps mention it as low priority? Actually, the plan says raise as [high]. But I should verify reality before confirming. Let me check git history to see if there's something. We can't easily. But the principle: "Avoid commenting on correct code." Since Doctrine decimal hydration returns string, the change to ?string is aligned. I'll drop that finding or note it's not an issue.
Actually wait—there's a subtlety. `setPercAliment(?string)` — in the S2299 Repository, `setPercAliment($data['percAliment'] ?? null)` where $data is probably from a request array, could contain e.g. a float if JSON-decoded? If the front sends JSON and data comes from json_decode with numeric "percAliment": 12.5, it'd be float 12.5 -> TypeError since setter expects ?string and strict_types... Let me check if the repository has strict_types declared. The diff context earlier showed repository has `declare(strict_types=1)`? Let's check.
Let me look at repository file. Also I want to check who calls setIndPagtoApi and whether that change to null matters. Actually there could be other callers setting IndPagtoApi with boolean... The changed line: `$event->setIndPagtoApi(isset($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado']) && $data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] !== '' ? ($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N') : null);` — This uses isset() which returns false if the key is null... They explicitly check for '' also, but not for null value: if `$data['avisoPrevioIndenizado']` is null (not ''), isset returns false (because null), so null. If it's '0', ternary -> 'N'. Wait: `isset(...) && !== ''` — if value is '0' string, isset true, !== '' true, then `$data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S':'N'` => '0' is falsy in PHP => 'N'. If 'S' string => truthy => 'S'. Actually 'N' would also be truthy => 'S'! Wait, 'N' is a non-empty string, so truthy => 'S'. Hmm! If the request data contains 'N' as the value of avisoPrevioIndenizado, the ternary `$data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N'` returns 'S' for any non-empty string, including 'N' or 'false'. Previously the code was `$data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N'` — same behavior for non-empty truthy. So only boolean semantics. Is avisoPrevioIndenizado sent as boolean (checkbox)? Probably the form sends a boolean. If the field is a checkbox that sends '1' or absent, the code works. 'N' semantics maybe unlikely. Not central.
But there is a real point: this expression `isset(...) && $data[...] !== '' ? (...) : null` is weird but functionally: value present and not '' => based on truthiness. It's fine if field sends boolean.
Now let me focus and look for genuinely reportable issues. Let me re-read the diff carefully.
Big candidate issues:
A) In AutomationExecutionService::executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft, there is a subtle bug: notification message uses `{{member_name}}` placeholder but the notify is executed via executeNotify with `'company_member'` and message with placeholders. Is the placeholder actually replaced? They merge context with member_id. Hmm. In the previous analogous code (create_processo_seletivo) they used templates? Let's check how executeNotify handles message placeholders. There may be a replace of {{member_name}} via a templating engine. Not sure.
B) In metadata updating: they flush after persisting member, then if event instanceof, re-fetch metadata, update eventId and flush again. Since after persist & flush, $event->getId() would be available (auto-generated id assigned by Doctrine after flush). Wait, they persist the event first only if $eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable' — inside the `else` block under `$remuneracao instanceof`. If worker data missing, event null. So first flush persists member metadata with eventId null. Then second flush updates eventId after event persisted. That's OK, but if $event was persisted in this same unit of work and assigned an id by the flush, fine. Slight redundancy but OK.
C) The new action is registered in services.yaml wiring? Yes for AutomationExecutionService setter injection.
D) Migration: `ensureOffboardingStages` inserts into flow_stages with `product_slot_index IS NULL` unique check by name lower. The INSERT sets stage_category NULL? Wait column stage_category not in insert list (fine, nullable?) Actually they set columns: flow_template_id, product_id, name, description, order_index, advance_rules, stage_category? No—looks like they pass stage_category? Let me re-read ensureStage INSERT:
```
'INSERT INTO flow_stages (flow_template_id, product_id, name, description, order_index, advance_rules, stage_category, phase_number, product_slot_index)
VALUES (:templateId, :productId, :name, :description, :orderIndex, :advanceRules, NULL, NULL, NULL)'
```
stage_category is NULL. OK.
The SELECT for existing stage matches `product_slot_index IS NULL` and name LOWER. But when re-running up() after down() sets is_active=0 on template but leaves stages, up() will find existing template by seed_migration key (still present in settings since down only adds seed_migration_rolled_back and leaves seed_migration? down unsets seed_migration then sets seed_migration_rolled_back). Wait, down unsets `seed_migration` key and adds `seed_migration_rolled_back`. So up() searching for seed_migration won't find it → creates new template. That results in duplicate templates for companies where migration was rolled back then re-run. And old template is is_active=0 but its stages/automations remain. New template created will conflict? ensureStage searches by template_id of the new template so no conflict, but you'd have two templates for same workflow, one active 0 with orphan data. Also flow_template_products for old template remain. This is the [low] finding #7 — the up() creates duplicate templates after rollback. Real, but low priority. Actually the bigger issue: the up() then inserts a new workflow_products? No, ensureWorkflowProduct checks existence by workflow+product globally (not template scoped). The down() deletes workflow_products only if no other active template references product. OK.
Wait — actually in the up() idempotency re-run scenario (not rollback): if migration partially ran and up is re-run (some migrations can be replayed?), ensureTemplate checks seed_migration present → returns existing. Good. The down() then up() cycle creates a second template because seed_migration was removed. But typically down() then up() is not the normal flow; still a rollback-reapply could happen. Low severity.
E) Migration re-run guard: `tableExists` checks each table in a list and `return;` if any missing. But migrations run in order; if a table doesn't exist yet due to other migrations not run, it returns silently with success; fine.
F) The migration inserts records without transaction (isTransactional false). Multiple inserts across tables with per-table checks; if fails midway, orphan rows could persist and then re-run will skip inserts (because select checks). Not fully idempotent but mostly tolerant.
G) OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService::applyPayloadValue for date dismissal always forceOverwrite for dtDeslig. Good.
Now the important: In executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft, note the event's find flow:
1. findEventLinkedToOffboarding via metadata → if event found and status != pendente → existing_not_editable; if pendente → update.
2. Else findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal (any non-pendente status) → existing_not_editable.
3. Else findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal → update.
The statuses: what statuses does S2299 use? Let me search statuses. Statuses in these esocial events: 'pendente', 'enviado'? maybe 'validado', 'erro', 'rejeitado', etc. If an 'erro'/'rejeitado' event exists for the same dismissal, the automation would treat it as not editable and would NOT create a new draft. That could be a dead-end. But maybe rejeitado events are meant to be re-sent (update via indRetif). Actually events in error could be updated. Let's check statuses used.
Also `eventMatchesContext` compares by company/trabalhador/remuneracao ids. OK.
Another potential real bug: In executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft, after computing `$eventStatus='draft_only'` when there is no esocialTrabalhador/remuneracao (missing data). Then they create notification. If esocial disabled (company->getEsocialMode()===null) they return skipped before try block. Good.
Wait — check: `$company->getEsocialMode() === null` — esocialMode could be integer or string '2'. If mode is null (not set), skip. But there's also company getEsocialMode returning? If mode is 0? Well, probably null when disabled.
H) There's a subtle but significant data-isolation concern: `executeNotify` sends to responsible resolved. The `resolveEsocialS2299Responsible` checks the configured responsible belongs to same company as the flow. OK.
I) Now potential **duplicate metadata flush** and an important issue: In the second flush block they fetch `$metadata = $member->getSourceMetadata()` again after first flush. Wait first they persist member with metadata (containing eventId = $event?->getId() which before flush is null for new event). Then flush. Then, if event exists, set eventId = $event->getId(). Since the event was persisted in the same flush, getId is now available. Fine.
But there is an ordering bug possibility: if worker data missing (event null) — the first flush happens and returns. Then no notification about creating official event. That path: eventStatus stays 'draft_only'. Notification message default: 'O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding...' Actually for draft_only (missing data present) they override notificationTitle to 'Dados eSocial pendentes...'. Yes they set if !empty($missing). Good. If no missing but no event (can't happen — no missing means both trabalhador & remuneracao exist, then event creation path runs and event created). If event created, eventStatus 'created'.
Hmm, one nuance: `$eventStatus = 'draft_only'` default, and 'missing' messages only when missing non-empty. The draft_only with missing==[] and event==null impossible.
J) Notification flow via executeNotify with system_sender. This modifies shared chat behavior. Look at the change of $isPayrollSystemSender to $isSystemSender: `filter_var($config['system_sender'] ?? false, FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN)`. config from executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft passes system_sender => true. Good.
Now check #5: is `system_sender` user-editable in automation config (front-end)? They added config to send_email/request_notification config path (line 7047 area): `'system_sender' => $config['system_sender'] ?? null`. This config comes from `$config` presumably the action's config which is stored in DB flow_automations.actions config set by users building automations. If a user can set `system_sender: true` in their notification action config via the UI, then messages impersonate Adriana. Need to check where that config originates — maybe from JSON action config stored from UI. Let's look at the surrounding method to understand whether $config is arbitrary user-editable automation config. Since the code path at 7047 is inside some notify method that builds emailConfig from `$config`, where $config may come from the automation action config (stored JSON) — i.e., user editable. But is the field set by internal callers only? The new field is only written internally (system_sender=>true in the S2299 draft action). But since config is JSON from DB, a user could inject. This is speculative unless we confirm the front-end allows arbitrary config keys. Given precision-over-recall, maybe I shouldn't report without confirming config is user-controlled.
Let me look at the notification method around line 7039 to see context and how config is used and stored. Also check if there's a controller that saves automation actions with arbitrary config.
Let me read the AutomationExecutionService around 7000-7060 and the notify method ~13900-13960.
K) The test uses `new AutomationExecutionService(...)` with 9 positional args. Let's verify constructor signature to ensure test matches. Not needed for review, but if the constructor differs from test args, tests fail. Let me read constructor.
L) For the service's getOffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService fallback creation with `new OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService($this->entityManager, $this->router)`. $this->router — is AutomationExecutionService's router property? Yes there's likely `private ?RouterInterface $router`. OK.
M) Cross-company leak in `findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal`/`findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal`: filter by company. Good. But `findEventLinkedToOffboarding` uses eventId from metadata and then eventMatchesContext to confirm company/trabalhador/remuneracao match. Good.
N) Migration detail: `ensureActivity` selects by name 'Offboarding' only (no stage filter—yes there's flow_stage_id). Fine.
Now #3: statuses. Let me search for where S2299 statuses are set and what values, to evaluate the "any non-pendente status => not editable" concern.
Let me also verify issue #1 (god object) — I'll get method count.
Let me run multiple searches:
1. code_search statuses on EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento setStatus in src.
2. file_find S2299.
3. read constructor of AutomationExecutionService.
4. Read around line 7030-7060 and 13880-13960 for notify context.
5. Search for system_sender in whole repo.
6. Count methods in AutomationExecutionService.
Let me do these in parallel.
Tool Calls (3)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/"], "search_text": "setStatus\\("}
Result
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/", "config/", "templates/", "assets/"], "search_text": "system_sender"}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 3 7050| 'system_sender' => $config['system_sender'] ?? null, 13918| $isSystemSender = filter_var($config['system_sender'] ?? false, FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN) 15087| 'system_sender' => true,
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": " private function "}
Result
Note: The results have been truncated. Only showing first 100 results. File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 100 558| private function executeFinancialFlowAction(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member = null, array $context = []): array 575| private function executeEsocialValidatePayrollEvents(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member = null, array $context = []): array 702| private function executePayrollGenerateMonthlySheet(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member = null, array $context = [], string $frequency = 'monthly'): array 912| private function syncPayrollSubPeriodConfig(FlowInstance $flowInstance, Payroll $payroll, string $frequency): void 937| private function ensurePayrollSheetMembers( 1081| private function resolvePayrollTypeContractIdsByScope(string $scope): array 1111| private function calculatePayrollMemberSnapshot(Company $company, float $baseAmount, bool $applyInss, bool $applyIrrf): array 1125| private function calculatePayrollLegalDiscounts(Company $company, float $baseAmount, bool $applyInss, bool $applyIrrf): array 1144| private function buildPayrollDiscountBracketsPayload(Company $company): array 1190| private function hasConfiguredPayrollBrackets(array $brackets): bool 1205| private function calculatePayrollInssDiscountFromBrackets(float $baseAmount, array $brackets): array 1252| private function calculatePayrollIrrfDiscountFromBrackets(float $baseAmount, array $brackets): array 1303| private function findLinkedPayrollRecord(array $flowConfig): array 1315| private function parsePayrollPaymentDate(mixed $value): ?\DateTimeImmutable 1335| private function toBool(mixed $value): bool 1348| private function syncPayrollGeneratedConfig(FlowInstance $flowInstance, Payroll $payroll): void 1373| private function executeEsocialSendPayrollEvents(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member = null, array $context = []): array 1480| private function executeEsocialCheckPayrollResponse(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member = null, array $context = []): array 1568| private function storeEsocialAutomationResult(FlowInstance $flowInstance, FlowInstanceMember $member, string $key, array $payload): void 1591| private function buildEsocialValidationNotificationMessage(array $validation): string 1622| private function buildEsocialValidationNotificationMessageHtml(array $validation): string 1665| private function resolvePayrollCompetenceFromFlow(FlowInstance $flowInstance, FlowInstanceMember $member): ?array 1698| private function findPayrollsForEsocialValidation(Company $company, int $year, int $month, ?\DateTimeImmutable $paymentDate = null): array 1722| private function buildPayrollEsocialAutomationValidation( 1873| private function buildEsocialAutomationWorkerBlocker( 1887| private function getRequiredCompanyEsocialAutomationEvents(): array 1897| private function findBestCompanyEsocialAutomationEvent(Company $company, string $eventClass): ?object 1917| private function findLatestCompanyEsocialAutomationEvent(Company $company, string $eventClass): ?object 1929| private function findLatestS2200AutomationEvent(Company $company, CompanyMembers $companyMember, EsocialDadosTrabalhador $trabalhador): ?EsocialS2200EvtAdmissao 1945| private function normalizeEsocialAutomationStatus(string $status): string 1964| private function labelEsocialAutomationStatus(string $statusKey, string $rawStatus = ''): string 1979| private function ensureRequestNotificationKeyForExecution(FlowAutomation $automation, array $action, int $fallbackIndex): array 2010| private function buildDeterministicRequestKeyForExecution(FlowAutomation $automation, array $action, int $fallbackIndex): string 2030| private function executeBpmNotification(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array 2067| private function notifyEsocialResponsible( 2093| private function appendEsocialHistoryEntry( 2146| private function executeRequestNotification(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array 2579| private function executeCrmOrNpsRequestNotificationAction(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array 2612| private function shouldUseBpmRequestNotificationForCrmYamlAction(FlowInstanceMember $member): bool 2622| private function resolveCrmRecordEntityFromFlowMember(FlowInstanceMember $member): ?object 2649| private function mergeNpsNotifyRecipientConfig(string $to, array $config, array $context = []): array 2694| private function getCrmRecordOwnerEmails(FlowInstanceMember $member): array 2726| private function resolveLinkedCrmFlowMemberForNpsInvite(FlowInstanceMember $npsMember): ?FlowInstanceMember 2784| private function getCrmBoardOwnerEmails(FlowInstanceMember $member): array 2834| private function normalizeCrmStyledRequestNotificationForBpm(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member): array 2908| private function enrichRequestNotificationTemplateValues(array $values, array $notifyConfig): array 2946| private function mapRequestRecipientLabel(string $recipientType): string 3228| private function executeStructuralResearchInviteAction(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array 3266| private function resolveStructuralResearchSurveyForFlowInstance(FlowInstance $flowInstance): ?StructuralResearchSurvey 3309| private function isStructuralResearchParticipantCompleted(StructuralResearchParticipant $participant): bool 4325| private function fireRequestDecisionTriggerOnCurrentStage( 4388| private function automationHasRequestDecisionTrigger(FlowAutomation $automation, array $triggerAliases): bool 4408| private function automationMatchesRequestDecisionContext( 4435| private function requestDecisionConditionMatches( 4472| private function requestDecisionAutomationResultsHadMaterialEffect(array $automationResults): bool 4516| private function extractRequestDecisionFailureReason(array $automationResults): ?string 4590| private function dispatchOnEnterAfterRequestDecisionMove(FlowInstanceMember $member, array $automationResults): void 4631| private function areRequestTypesCompatibleForDecision(string $configuredType, string $incomingType): bool 4661| private function resolveNpsSurveyMemberForRequestDecision(FlowInstanceMember $contextMember): ?FlowInstanceMember 4681| private function resolveNpsFlowStageForRequestDecision(FlowInstanceMember $member, string $stageKey): ?FlowStage 4694| private function getOrCreateDecisionRequestRecord(string $token, array $payload, FlowInstanceMember $member): FlowAutomationRequest 4733| private function resolveDecisionRequestKey(string $token, array $payload): string 4763| private function findPendingRequestRecordForAction( 4819| private function findPendingRequestRecordByFlowInstance( 4859| private function resolveRecipientEmailsForRequestNotification( 4883| private function resolveRecipientUsersForRequestNotification( 4905| private function upsertPendingRequestRecordForNotification( 5062| private function assignMemberToTargetFlow(FlowInstanceMember $member, int $targetFlowInstanceId, string $requestType): array 5144| private function resolveInitialStageForFlowAssignment(FlowInstance $targetFlow, string $requestType): ?FlowStage 5171| private function getNextFlowOrderIndex(FlowInstance $flowInstance): int 5184| private function resolveMemberFromDecisionPayload(array $payload): ?FlowInstanceMember 5224| private function buildRequestDecisionUrl(string $token, string $decision): string 5241| private function generateRequestDecisionToken(array $payload): string 5272| private function decodeRequestDecisionToken(string $token): ?array 5299| private function getRequestDecisionSecret(): string 5352| private function evaluateCondition(array $condition, string $triggerEvent, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): bool 5454| private function evaluateFinancialLifecycleCondition( 5474| private function evaluateFinancialDomainCondition( 5494| private function isCompatibleTrigger(string $conditionType, string $triggerEvent): bool 5577| private function evaluateActivitiesPercentageCondition(array $config, array $context): bool 5600| private function evaluateTrainingPercentageCondition(array $config, array $context): bool 5617| private function evaluateExitDateCondition(array $config, array $context): bool 5655| private function evaluateRequestCondition(array $config, array $context): bool 5695| private function buildCrmNotifyConfig(string $recipientType, array $config, array $context): array 5726| private function resolveRequestTypeLabel(string $requestType): string 5751| private function buildAssessment360PublishRequestMessage(FlowInstanceMember $member, string $baseMessage): string 5854| private function evaluatePdiPercentageCondition(array $config, array $context): bool 5886| private function evaluatePdiDeadlineCondition(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member): bool 5921| private function executeSendEmail(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array 6164| private function buildEmailTemplateValues(?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array 6645| private function executeSendWhatsApp(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array 6673| private function getAppBaseUrl($company): string 6682| private function resolveAssessment360BpmQuestionnaireUrl(?FlowInstanceMember $member): string 6706| private function buildAssessment360QuestionnaireButtonHtml(string $absoluteUrl): string 6722| private function resolveFlowKanbanCardTitle(?FlowInstanceMember $member): string 6786| private function resolveCrmKanbanBoardTitleForAutomation(FlowInstanceMember $member): ?string 6812| private function resolveMemberDisplayName(?FlowInstanceMember $member): string 6902| private function executeNotifyEsocialWorkerData(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array 6936| private function executeNotify(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array 7095| private function resolveFinancialMoveStageByKey(
Request #3
deepseek-v4-flash
P:54.16K C:464 CR:51.58K CW:0
3827ms
Reasoning
Interesting. `setStatus(` no matches in src? That's strange because createDraftEvent sets `$event->setStatus('pendente')` in the draft service. Wait, my search may have failed due to the regex: `setStatus\(` without escaping? I used `search_text` "setStatus\(" with use_perl_regexp... Actually I passed search_text='setStatus\(' but didn't set use_perl_regexp=true. Hmm, I set file_patterns src/ but not use_perl_regexp. Default is literal search. So literal "setStatus\(" wouldn't match "setStatus(" — with backslash it fails. That's why no matches. Let me redo with literal.
Also for the private function count, the results truncated at 100 but the file has ~14k lines so there are many methods (well over 100). Confirms god object scale.
Let me search statuses properly and also look at the whole diff of AutomationExecutionService additions again to check for real issues. Let me search 'setStatus(' literal in src and templates.
Also read repository file fully, plus read lines around 7039 and 13880-13960 for context of the notify config to understand system_sender user-editable concern.
Let me run these in parallel.
Tool Calls (3)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/"], "search_text": "setStatus("}
Result
Note: The results have been truncated. Only showing first 100 results.
File: src/Command/AddParticipantToProcessCommand.php
Match lines: 2
151| $processChat->setStatus(ProcessChat::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
174| $processChat->setStatus(ProcessChat::STATUS_COMPLETED);
File: src/Command/CleanProcessesCommand.php
Match lines: 1
264| $processo->setStatus('Close');
File: src/Command/CreatePitchTaskCommand.php
Match lines: 1
127| $task->setStatus('pending');
File: src/Command/CreateTestProcessCommand.php
Match lines: 1
191| $process->setStatus(Process::STATUS_ACTIVE);
File: src/Command/GenerateCandidateAccountsCommand.php
Match lines: 2
194| $invitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
250| $contract->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_EM_ANDAMENTO);
File: src/Command/OntologyDemoSignalsSeedCommand.php
Match lines: 2
192| ->setStatus(OntologyAlertReview::STATUS_PENDING_REVIEW)
224| ->setStatus(OntologyAlertReview::STATUS_PENDING_REVIEW)
File: src/Command/ProcessTrmWorkflowsCommand.php
Match lines: 1
193| $campaign->setStatus('COMPLETED');
File: src/Command/SeedAccountReceivableStatusesCommand.php
Match lines: 1
116| $ar->setStatus($def['status']);
File: src/Command/SeedBudgetDemoStatusesCommand.php
Match lines: 1
84| $budget->setStatus($status);
File: src/Command/SeedPayrollDashboardSimulationCommand.php
Match lines: 14
417| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_COMPLETED);
420| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
438| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_COMPLETED);
441| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
452| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_CANCELLED);
455| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_WITHDRAWN);
465| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
467| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
485| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
487| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
499| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
501| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
511| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
513| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
File: src/Command/SeedSsmaOccurrencePanelDemoCommand.php
Match lines: 1
128| $event->setStatus($def['status']);
File: src/Command/TrmCampaignSendCommand.php
Match lines: 5
179| $blockedInteraction->setStatus('BLOCKED');
239| $interaction->setStatus($deliveryStatus);
271| $campaign->setStatus(TrmCampaign::STATUS_COMPLETED);
619| $campaign->setStatus(TrmCampaign::STATUS_PAUSED);
641| $campaign->setStatus(TrmCampaign::STATUS_PAUSED);
File: src/Command/UpdateDelayedGoalsCommand.php
Match lines: 1
82| $gda->setStatus($isDelayed ? GoalDevelopmentAction::STATUS_DELAYED : GoalDevelopmentAction::STATUS_OPEN);
File: src/Controller/AdminBenefitController.php
Match lines: 2
65| ->setStatus($this->user->isSuperAdmin() ? (int) $request->get('status', 0) : 0);
99| $benefit->setStatus((int) $request->get('status', 0));
File: src/Controller/AdminController.php
Match lines: 9
1283| // $contract->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_EM_ANDAMENTO);
1307| // $schedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATOR_NOT_ASSIGNED);
1361| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
1399| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
1490| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
1681| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
1777| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
1944| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
1998| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
File: src/Controller/Adriana/IaProcessController.php
Match lines: 2
2213| $contratacao->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_NAO_PASSOU);
2258| $contratacao->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_CONTRATADO);
File: src/Controller/AiCommitteeController.php
Match lines: 6
1645| $session->setStatus(
2780| $session->setStatus('processing');
2860| $session->setStatus('processing');
3165| $entity->setStatus('pending_analysis');
6516| $session->setStatus('processing');
6708| $session->setStatus('failed');
File: src/Controller/Api/BrainstormEvidenceController.php
Match lines: 1
352| $evidence->setStatus(AiCommitteeBrainstormEvidence::STATUS_REVOKED);
File: src/Controller/Api/ChatFlowableApiController.php
Match lines: 2
464| $participant->setStatus('active');
630| $participant->setStatus('active');
File: src/Controller/Api/CompanyApiController.php
Match lines: 1
466| $invitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
File: src/Controller/Api/GoalsFlowableApiController.php
Match lines: 2
642| $goal->setStatus(Goal::STATUS_FINISHED);
650| $gda->setStatus(\App\Entity\GoalDevelopmentAction::STATUS_FINISHED);
File: src/Controller/Api/LicenseApiController.php
Match lines: 7
626| $license->setStatus($data['status'] ?? 'Habilitado');
682| $license->setStatus($data['status']);
829| $licenseMember->setStatus($data['status'] ?? 'Em Edição');
883| $licenseMember->setStatus('Aprovado');
916| $licenseMember->setStatus('Rejeitado');
949| $licenseMember->setStatus('Cancelado');
991| $licenseTeams->setStatus('Publicado');
File: src/Controller/Api/MyPlanApiController.php
Match lines: 2
389| $addon->setStatus('active');
444| $addon->setStatus('disable');
File: src/Controller/Api/OffboardingApiController.php
Match lines: 2
1049| $offboardingMember->setStatus($status);
1222| $offboardingMember->setStatus($status);
File: src/Controller/Api/ProfessionalAssessmentApiController.php
Match lines: 1
369| $invitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
File: src/Controller/Api/SubsidiaryCompanyFlowableApiController.php
Match lines: 2
545| $invitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
837| $invitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
File: src/Controller/Api/TemplatesApiController.php
Match lines: 6
147| $assessment->setStatus($data['status'] ?? 'inativa');
201| $assessment->setStatus($data['status'] ?? $assessment->getStatus());
266| $assessment->setStatus('ativa');
597| $questionnaire->setStatus($data['status'] ?? 'Em Edição');
643| $questionnaire->setStatus($data['status'] ?? $questionnaire->getStatus());
815| $specialist->setStatus($data['status'], $data['type']);
File: src/Controller/Api/TrmApiController.php
Match lines: 33
435| $person->setStatus('ACTIVE');
551| $person->setStatus($data['status']);
643| $person->setStatus(TrmPerson::STATUS_INACTIVE);
681| $person->setStatus(TrmPerson::STATUS_INACTIVE);
1047| $community->setStatus($status);
1201| $community->setStatus($data['status']);
1261| $community->setStatus(TrmCommunity::STATUS_ARCHIVED);
1298| $community->setStatus(TrmCommunity::STATUS_ARCHIVED);
1558| $campaign->setStatus($status);
1948| $campaign->setStatus(TrmCampaign::STATUS_RUNNING);
2046| $task->setStatus('PENDING');
2070| $campaign->setStatus(TrmCampaign::STATUS_COMPLETED);
2157| $campaign->setStatus(TrmCampaign::STATUS_PAUSED);
2177| $campaign->setStatus(TrmCampaign::STATUS_PAUSED);
2377| $campaign->setStatus(TrmCampaign::STATUS_PAUSED);
2431| $campaign->setStatus(TrmCampaign::STATUS_COMPLETED);
2668| $campaign->setStatus(TrmCampaign::STATUS_CANCELLED);
2709| $newCampaign->setStatus(TrmCampaign::STATUS_DRAFT);
3266| $interaction->setStatus(TrmInteraction::STATUS_SENT);
3269| $interaction->setStatus(TrmInteraction::STATUS_FAILED);
4651| $task->setStatus($data['status']);
4686| $task->setStatus(TrmTask::STATUS_COMPLETED);
4801| $person->setStatus('QUALIFIED');
4803| $person->setStatus('DISQUALIFIED');
4805| $person->setStatus('ON_HOLD');
5307| $interaction->setStatus(TrmInteraction::STATUS_SENT);
5648| $consent->setStatus('GRANTED');
5652| $consent->setStatus('REVOKED');
5858| $person->setStatus('INACTIVE');
5862| $consent->setStatus('REVOKED');
6049| $participant->setStatus('active');
6064| $participant->setStatus('active');
6072| $participant->setStatus('removed');
File: src/Controller/Api/TrmWebhookController.php
Match lines: 2
239| $interaction->setStatus(TrmInteraction::STATUS_DELIVERED);
388| $person->setStatus('ACTIVE');
File: src/Controller/Api/WelfareHubApiController.php
Match lines: 6
348| $creditRequest->setStatus(CreditsRequests::STATUS_APPROVED);
399| $request->setStatus(CreditsRequests::STATUS_PENDING);
958| $consultation->setStatus('Agendado');
1010| $consultation->setStatus(SpecialistHealthConsult::STATUS_REAGENDADO);
1041| $consultation->setStatus(SpecialistHealthConsult::STATUS_CANCELADO);
1075| $consultation->setStatus(SpecialistHealthConsult::STATUS_CONCLUIDO);
File: src/Controller/Assessment360Controller.php
Match lines: 3
150| $questionnaire->setStatus($data['status']);
821| $assessment->setStatus('inativa');
823| $assessment->setStatus('ativa');
File: src/Controller/BankReturnsController.php
Match lines: 8
1914| $bankReturn->setStatus($data['status'] ?? 'draft');
2180| $bankReturn->setStatus($newStatus);
2287| $bankReturn->setStatus('approved');
2410| $bankReturn->setStatus('approved');
2465| $bankReturn->setStatus('approved');
2540| $bankReturn->setStatus('draft');
3010| $bankReturn->setStatus('paid');
3072| $bankReturn->setStatus('paid');
File: src/Controller/BanksController.php
Match lines: 3
606| $bankAccount->setStatus(in_array($status, ['ativo', 'active', '1'], true));
1430| $bankAccount->setStatus($data['status'] == '1' || $data['status'] === 1 || $data['status'] === true);
1642| $bankAccount->setStatus($data['status'] == '1' || $data['status'] === 1 || $data['status'] === true);
File: src/Controller/BookRoomController.php
Match lines: 3
265| ->setStatus(SpaceBooking::STATUS_CONFIRMED);
406| ->setStatus(SpaceBooking::STATUS_CONFIRMED);
483| $booking->setStatus(SpaceBooking::STATUS_CANCELLED);
File: src/Controller/BudgetsController.php
Match lines: 4
1910| $budget->setStatus(BudgetStatus::normalize($rawStatus !== '' ? $rawStatus : BudgetStatus::RASCRUNHO));
2734| $budget->setStatus($statusNorm);
3091| $budget->setStatus($newStatus);
3272| $budget->setStatus($targets[$action]);
File: src/Controller/ChatController.php
Match lines: 2
191| $participant->setStatus('active');
211| $participant->setStatus('active');
File: src/Controller/ChatGroupController.php
Match lines: 4
455| $participantToRemove->setStatus('removed');
676| $userParticipant->setStatus('left');
783| $newParticipant->setStatus('active');
789| $existingParticipant->setStatus('active');
File: src/Controller/CognitiveAssessmentController.php
Match lines: 1
12244| $schedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATOR_NOT_ASSIGNED);
File: src/Controller/CompanyAreaController.php
Match lines: 8
629| $processDepartment->setStatus($status);
769| $knowledgeArea->setStatus($this->normalizeStatus(
842| $processDepartment->setStatus($this->normalizeStatus((string) $status, CompanyArea::STATUS_ACTIVE));
1287| $processDepartment->setStatus($status);
1439| ->setStatus(KnowledgeArea::STATUS_ACTIVE)
1530| ->setStatus($status)
1599| ->setStatus(KnowledgeArea::STATUS_ACTIVE);
2073| ->setStatus($status)
File: src/Controller/CompanyController.php
Match lines: 3
508| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
967| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
1453| $invitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
File: src/Controller/CompanyExamRequestController.php
Match lines: 1
135| $examRequest->setStatus($payload['status']);
File: src/Controller/CompanyInvitationConfirmationController.php
Match lines: 4
381| $selectedInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
1231| $invitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
1279| $invitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
2872| $contract->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_EM_ANDAMENTO);
File: src/Controller/CompanyManagementController.php
Match lines: 3
213| $conn->setStatus(SstEntityConnection::STATUS_PENDING);
292| $conn->setStatus(SstEntityConnection::STATUS_PENDING);
391| $connection->setStatus(SstEntityConnection::STATUS_PENDING);
File: src/Controller/CompanyMemberController.php
Match lines: 2
1047| $event->setStatus('processado');
3344| $aut->setStatus('inativa');
File: src/Controller/CostCentersController.php
Match lines: 3
1845| $costCenter->setStatus(CostCenter::normalizePlanningStatusFlag($statusRaw));
2961| $cc->setStatus($status);
3367| $cc->setStatus($status);
File: src/Controller/CrmController.php
Match lines: 9
656| $crmEntry->setStatus($status);
1608| $product->setStatus($status);
1708| $product->setStatus($status);
1868| ->setStatus(trim((string) $record[$headerMap['status']]));
3411| $service->setStatus($data['status']);
3506| $service->setStatus($status);
3619| $service->setStatus($record[$headerMap['status']]);
4265| $product->setStatus($newStatus);
4329| $service->setStatus($newStatus);
File: src/Controller/CrmLeadsController.php
Match lines: 6
688| $crmLeads->setStatus($statusLead);
2602| $lead->setStatus($leadStatuses[0]);
3542| $lead->setStatus($statusEntity);
4544| $leadToUpdate->setStatus($status);
4914| $currentLead->setStatus($statusLead);
5417| $lead->setStatus($defaultStatus);
File: src/Controller/CrmOpportunityController.php
Match lines: 1
1092| $lead->setStatus($leadStatuses[0]);
File: src/Controller/CrmSalesController.php
Match lines: 1
825| $lead->setStatus($leadStatuses[0]);
File: src/Controller/CulturalHubController.php
Match lines: 9
453| $post->setStatus($status);
513| $post->setStatus(CulturalHubBlogPost::STATUS_PUBLISHED);
516| $post->setStatus(CulturalHubBlogPost::STATUS_REPROVED);
594| $post->setStatus(CulturalHubBlogPost::STATUS_ARCHIVED);
1677| $goal->setStatus(Goal::STATUS_OPEN);
1728| $goal->setStatus(Goal::STATUS_FINISHED);
4010| $newsletter->setStatus(CulturalHubNewsletter::STATUS_CREATED);
4012| $newsletter->setStatus(CulturalHubNewsletter::STATUS_IN_EDITION);
4254| $published->setStatus(CulturalHubNewsletter::STATUS_PUBLISHED);
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystem/FlowInstanceController.php
Match lines: 17
3289| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE); // Onboarding: ativar imediatamente (Java/Flowable é complementar, não bloqueia o fluxo)
3352| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
3718| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_INACTIVE); // ✅ Começa como INACTIVE, será ativado pelo Java
3762| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
5278| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
5825| $process->setStatus($status);
10120| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_INACTIVE);
10192| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
10195| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_INACTIVE);
11082| $process->setStatus($data['status'] ?? Process::STATUS_ACTIVE);
11340| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
11380| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
11498| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_INACTIVE);
11509| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_INACTIVE);
11521| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_INACTIVE);
11533| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_INACTIVE);
11654| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystem/FlowKanbanController.php
Match lines: 26
448| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
461| $flowInstanceMember->setStatus('in_progress');
1427| $member->setStatus($finalStatus);
1479| $offboardingMember->setStatus($statusEncerrado);
1723| $offboardingMember->setStatus($statusEmAndamento);
2327| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
2483| $invitation->setStatus(\App\Entity\UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
2593| if ($status) $offboardingMember->setStatus($status);
2711| if ($status) $offboardingMember->setStatus($status);
2780| $contracts->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_CONTRATADO);
2784| $contracts->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_CLASSIFICADO);
2787| $contracts->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_NAO_PASSOU);
3161| $member->setStatus(\App\Entity\FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
6136| $fim->setStatus('classified');
6275| $member->setStatus('classified');
6284| $member->setStatus('completed'); // ✅ FIX: Use 'completed' status for offboarding
6310| $offboardingMember->setStatus($statusEncerrado);
6476| $member->setStatus('active');
6576| $member->setStatus(\App\Entity\FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_TRANSFERRED);
6588| $newOnboardingMember->setStatus(\App\Entity\FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
6612| $member->setStatus(\App\Entity\FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
6914| $contracts->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_CONTRATADO);
6917| $contracts->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_NAO_PASSOU);
7546| $contracts->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_CONTRATADO);
7549| $contracts->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_CLASSIFICADO);
7551| $contracts->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_NAO_PASSOU);
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystemController.php
Match lines: 42
8086| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE); // Onboarding: ativar imediatamente (Java/Flowable é complementar, não bloqueia o fluxo)
8150| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
8516| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_INACTIVE); // ✅ Começa como INACTIVE, será ativado pelo Java
8561| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
9162| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
9275| $process->setStatus($status);
13526| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
13539| $flowInstanceMember->setStatus('in_progress');
14008| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_INACTIVE);
14080| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
14084| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_INACTIVE);
14971| $process->setStatus($data['status'] ?? Process::STATUS_ACTIVE);
15231| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
15271| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
15390| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_INACTIVE);
15401| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_INACTIVE);
15413| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_INACTIVE);
15425| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_INACTIVE);
16151| $member->setStatus($finalStatus);
16203| $offboardingMember->setStatus($statusEncerrado);
16439| $offboardingMember->setStatus($statusEmAndamento);
16950| $invitation->setStatus(\App\Entity\UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
17060| if ($status) $offboardingMember->setStatus($status);
17178| if ($status) $offboardingMember->setStatus($status);
17247| $contracts->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_CONTRATADO);
17260| $contracts->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_CLASSIFICADO);
17263| $contracts->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_NAO_PASSOU);
17616| $member->setStatus(\App\Entity\FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
20295| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
20679| $fim->setStatus('classified');
20825| $member->setStatus('classified');
20834| $member->setStatus('completed'); // ✅ FIX: Use 'completed' status for offboarding
20860| $offboardingMember->setStatus($statusEncerrado);
21026| $member->setStatus('active');
21100| $member->setStatus(\App\Entity\FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_TRANSFERRED);
21112| $newOnboardingMember->setStatus(\App\Entity\FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
21136| $member->setStatus(\App\Entity\FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
21405| $contracts->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_CONTRATADO);
21417| $contracts->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_NAO_PASSOU);
21903| $contracts->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_CONTRATADO);
21915| $contracts->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_CLASSIFICADO);
21917| $contracts->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_NAO_PASSOU);
File: src/Controller/DocumentController.php
Match lines: 2
70| $document->setStatus(2);
122| $document->setStatus($status);
File: src/Controller/EnglishTrainingModuleController.php
Match lines: 4
109| $module->setStatus($data['status']);
287| $module->setStatus($status);
450| $newModule->setStatus($module->getStatus());
470| $newChapter->setStatus($v->getStatus());
File: src/Controller/EsocialController.php
Match lines: 1
332| $event->setStatus('processado');
File: src/Controller/EsocialEventsController.php
Match lines: 1
551| $eventoParaExcluir->setStatus('EXCLUSAO_SOLICITADA');
File: src/Controller/EvaluatorController.php
Match lines: 27
268| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
367| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
1495| $monitoredEvaluationSchedule->setStatus(MonitoredEvaluationSchedule::ACCEPTANCE_OF_EVALUATOR_PENDING);
1577| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::ACCEPTANCE_OF_EVALUATOR_PENDING);
1682| $monitoredEvaluationSchedule->setStatus(MonitoredEvaluationSchedule::ACCEPTANCE_OF_EVALUATOR_PENDING);
1763| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::ACCEPTANCE_OF_EVALUATOR_PENDING);
1863| $monitoredEvaluationSchedule->setStatus(MonitoredEvaluationSchedule::EVALUATOR_REQUIRED);
1882| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATOR_REQUIRED);
1916| $invitation->setStatus($status);
1920| $monitoredEvaluationSchedule->setStatus(MonitoredEvaluationSchedule::EVALUATION_PENDING);
1926| $monitoredEvaluationSchedule->setStatus(MonitoredEvaluationSchedule::EVALUATOR_NOT_ASSIGNED);
1952| $invitation->setStatus($index === 0
1958| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::ASSIGNED_TO_THE_EVALUATOR);
1966| $invitation->setStatus(EvaluatorLiveInterviewScheduleInvitation::REJECTED);
1971| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATOR_NOT_ASSIGNED);
2379| // $v->setStatus(MonitoredEvaluationSchedule::TRUNCATED_INTERVIEW);
2704| $schedule->setStatus($type === 'monitoredEvaluationSchedule'
2729| $invitation->setStatus(EvaluatorMonitoredEvaluationInvitation::PENDING);
2899| $meetingPremiumEvaluator->setStatus(MeetingPremiumEvaluator::EVALUATOR_CONFIRMED);
2910| $meetingPremiumEvaluator->setStatus(MeetingPremiumEvaluator::EVALUATOR_PROPOSES_ANOTHER_DATE);
2956| $meetingPremiumEvaluator->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::CONFIRMED_BY_THE_CANDIDATE);
2971| $meetingPremiumEvaluator->getMonitoredEvaluationSchedule()->setStatus(MonitoredEvaluationSchedule::EVALUATION_PENDING);
2972| $meetingPremiumEvaluator->setStatus(MeetingPremiumEvaluator::DONE);
2994| $meetingPremiumEvaluator->setStatus(MeetingPremiumEvaluator::EVALUATOR_INVITATION_SENT);
3043| $monitoredEvaluationSchedule->setStatus(MonitoredEvaluationSchedule::EVALUATION_PENDING);
3048| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::ASSIGNED_TO_THE_EVALUATOR);
3054| $meetingPremiumEvaluator->setStatus(MeetingPremiumEvaluator::RELEASE);
File: src/Controller/Finance/PayrollFinanceController.php
Match lines: 16
475| $payable->setStatus('open');
513| $p->setStatus(self::SHEET_STATUS_CLOSED); // Fechada
665| $created->setStatus(self::SHEET_STATUS_BUILD);
1252| $created->setStatus(self::SHEET_STATUS_BUILD);
1383| $inv->setStatus(\App\Entity\UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
4345| $ph->setStatus(self::SHEET_STATUS_APPROVED);
4389| $ph->setStatus(self::SHEET_STATUS_BUILD);
4434| $ph->setStatus(self::SHEET_STATUS_BUILD);
4554| $existingTarget->setStatus(self::SHEET_STATUS_BUILD);
4838| $ph->setStatus(self::SHEET_STATUS_CLOSED);
4958| $existingEditable->setStatus('open');
4980| $ap->setStatus('open');
5032| $ph->setStatus(self::SHEET_STATUS_CLOSED);
5124| $ph->setStatus(self::SHEET_STATUS_BUILD);
6690| $newCc->setStatus('1');
6727| $supplier->setStatus('1');
File: src/Controller/FreeTrialController.php
Match lines: 8
493| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
679| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
1038| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
1051| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
1280| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
1589| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
1665| $memberInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
1821| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
File: src/Controller/GoalActionPlanItemController.php
Match lines: 3
36| $item->setStatus(GoalActionPlanItem::STATUS_DONE);
76| $item->setStatus($status);
106| ->setStatus(GoalActionPlanItem::STATUS_OPEN)
File: src/Controller/GoalDevelopmentActionController.php
Match lines: 5
267| $gda->setStatus(Goal::STATUS_FINISHED);
317| $gda->setStatus(0);
366| $gda->setStatus(GoalDevelopmentAction::STATUS_OPEN);
371| $gda->setStatus(GoalDevelopmentAction::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
375| $gda->setStatus(GoalDevelopmentAction::STATUS_FINISHED);
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php
Match lines: 7
1417| $aut->setStatus('ativa');
1420| $aut->setStatus(in_array($statusRaw, ['inativa', 'inativo', '0', 'false'], true) ? 'inativa' : 'ativa');
1626| $aut->setStatus('inativa');
1669| $aut->setStatus('ativa');
2363| $doc->setStatus(GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_APROVADO)
2609| $doc->setStatus($acao === 'aprovar' ? GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_APROVADO : GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_REPROVADO)
4334| ->setStatus(GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_PENDENTE);
File: src/Controller/IaController.php
Match lines: 2
1301| $goal->setStatus($novoStatus);
1368| $task->setStatus($novoStatus);
File: src/Controller/InnovationResearchController.php
Match lines: 21
145| $structuralResearchCopy->setStatus($structuralResearch->getStatus());
226| $structuralResearchForm->setStatus($receivedValues['status']);
1070| $structuralResearchUser->setStatus(StructuralResearchUser::PENDING);
1132| $structuralResearchUser->setStatus(StructuralResearchUser::FINISHED);
1294| $structuralResearchUser->setStatus(StructuralResearchUser::FINISHED);
1478| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(-2);
1550| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(-2);
1636| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
1768| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
2142| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
8318| // $structuralResearch->setStatus($status);
9200| $questionnaire->setStatus(false);
9210| $ia->setStatus(1);
9244| $questionnaire->setStatus($statusBool);
9420| $questionnaire->setStatus($data['status'] && $data['status'] == '1' ? '1' : '0');
9920| $structuralResearchUser->setStatus(\App\Entity\StructuralResearchUser::FINISHED);
10074| $questionnaire->setStatus(false);
10122| $questionnaire->setStatus(true);
11047| $newInvite->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
11255| $structuralResearchUser->setStatus(StructuralResearchUser::INVITED);
11286| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
File: src/Controller/Interview/V2/InterviewConversationV2Controller.php
Match lines: 2
580| $answer->setStatus(InterviewAnswer::STATUS_ANSWERED);
655| $skipped->setStatus('skipped');
File: src/Controller/Interview/V2/InterviewTemplateV2Controller.php
Match lines: 1
114| $template->setStatus($data['status'] ?? InterviewTemplate::STATUS_ACTIVE);
File: src/Controller/InterviewController.php
Match lines: 11
378| $addon->setStatus('active');
690| ->setStatus($status)
763| ->setStatus($status)
819| $researcher->setStatus($status)->setUpdatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
1594| $template->setStatus($data['status']);
3149| $interview->setStatus(Interview::STATUS_PENDING);
4017| $interview->setStatus(Interview::STATUS_PENDING);
4122| $invite->setStatus(InterviewInvite::STATUS_ACTIVE);
4455| $resumableSession->setStatus(CandidateSession::STATUS_ACTIVE);
4586| $interview->setStatus('pending');
5394| $invite->setStatus(InterviewInvite::STATUS_ACTIVE);
File: src/Controller/JobController.php
Match lines: 4
256| $existingContract->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_EM_ANDAMENTO);
276| $existingContract->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_EM_ANDAMENTO);
352| $contract->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_EM_ANDAMENTO);
380| $schedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATOR_NOT_ASSIGNED);
File: src/Controller/JobInterviewController.php
Match lines: 12
381| $interview->setStatus('pending');
578| $interview->setStatus('in_progress');
852| $interview->setStatus('completed');
1478| $answer->setStatus(JobInterviewAnswer::STATUS_ANSWERED);
2961| $template->setStatus($status);
3510| $media->setStatus(JobInterviewMedia::STATUS_ACTIVE);
3951| $template->setStatus('active');
4017| $template->setStatus('inactive');
4383| $template->setStatus($data['status']);
5196| $interview->setStatus('pending');
5328| $interview->setStatus('pending');
5416| $interview->setStatus('pending');
File: src/Controller/LicenseController.php
Match lines: 22
1730| $license->setStatus($request->request->get('status'));
1980| $licenseCollective->setStatus($request->request->get('status'));
2376| $licenseTeams->setStatus($request->request->get('status'));
2471| $licenseCollectiveType->setStatus($request->request->get('status'));
2590| $licenseMember->setStatus('Criado/Aprovado');
2594| $licenseMember->setStatus($statusFromRequest);
2598| $licenseMember->setStatus('Em Edição');
2600| $licenseMember->setStatus('Aprovado');
2697| $license->setStatus($request->request->get('status'));
2829| $licenseCollective->setStatus($request->request->get('status'));
2938| $licenseTeams->setStatus($request->request->get('status'));
2989| $licenseCollectiveType->setStatus($request->request->get('status'));
3040| $licenseTeams->setStatus('Publicado');
3059| $licenseMember->setStatus('Em Análise');
3079| $licenseMember->setStatus('Em Análise');
3117| $licenseMember->setStatus('Aprovado');
3145| $licenseMember->setStatus('Rejeitado');
3173| $licenseMember->setStatus('Cancelado');
3286| $licenseMember->setStatus('Pendente');
3290| $licenseMember->setStatus('EditCriado');
3412| $licenseMember->setStatus('Em Análise');
3450| $licenseMember->setStatus('Em Análise');
File: src/Controller/LiveInterviewScheduleController.php
Match lines: 58
422| $schedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATOR_NOT_ASSIGNED);
1455| $schedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATION_PENDING);
1481| $schedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::CONFIRMED_BY_THE_CANDIDATE);
2646| $schedule->setStatus(TrmInterviewSchedule::EVALUATOR_NOT_ASSIGNED);
2729| $schedule->setStatus(TrmInterviewSchedule::EVALUATION_PENDING);
3121| $v->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::TRUNCATED_INTERVIEW);
3318| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::INVITATION_SENT);
3371| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATION_PENDING);
3441| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::CONFIRMED_BY_THE_CANDIDATE);
3449| $interviewPanel->setStatus("Data Agendada");
3476| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::CANDIDATE_PROPOSES_ANOTHER_DATE);
3481| $interviewPanel->setStatus("Contra-Proposta");
3557| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::CHANGE_EVALUATOR);
3564| $invitation->setStatus(EvaluatorLiveInterviewScheduleInvitation::REJECTED);
3599| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATOR_REQUIRED);
3605| $invitation->setStatus(EvaluatorLiveInterviewScheduleInvitation::REJECTED);
3674| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::CONFIRMED_BY_THE_CANDIDATE);
3688| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATION_PENDING);
3706| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::INVITATION_SENT);
3799| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATION_COMPLETE);
3815| $evaluatorInvitation->setStatus(EvaluatorLiveInterviewScheduleInvitation::DONE);
3871| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus($status);
3876| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATION_COMPLETE);
3892| $evaluatorLiveInterviewScheduleInvitation->setStatus(EvaluatorLiveInterviewScheduleInvitation::DONE);
3938| $schedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::INVITATION_SENT);
3955| $schedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATOR_NOT_ASSIGNED);
3967| $invitation->setStatus(EvaluatorLiveInterviewScheduleInvitation::REJECTED);
4098| $schedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATION_COMPLETE);
4131| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus($status);
4153| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::SENT_FOR_REPORT);
4315| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::INVITATION_SENT);
4447| $request->setStatus(TrmSpecialistInterviewRequest::STATUS_INACTIVE);
4464| $request->setStatus(TrmSpecialistInterviewRequest::STATUS_ACTIVE);
4499| $schedule->setStatus(TrmInterviewSchedule::ASSIGNED_TO_THE_EVALUATOR);
4542| $schedule->setStatus(TrmInterviewSchedule::ASSIGNED_TO_THE_EVALUATOR);
4590| $schedule->setStatus(TrmInterviewSchedule::ACCEPTANCE_OF_EVALUATOR_PENDING);
4647| $schedule->setStatus(TrmInterviewSchedule::ACCEPTANCE_OF_EVALUATOR_PENDING);
4706| $schedule->setStatus(TrmInterviewSchedule::INVITATION_SENT);
4742| $schedule->setStatus(TrmInterviewSchedule::EVALUATOR_NOT_ASSIGNED);
4789| $schedule->setStatus(TrmInterviewSchedule::EVALUATION_COMPLETE);
4858| $schedule->setStatus(TrmInterviewSchedule::ASSIGNED_TO_THE_EVALUATOR);
4942| $schedule->setStatus(TrmInterviewSchedule::INVITATION_SENT);
4963| $schedule->setStatus(TrmInterviewSchedule::DECLINED_BY_TALENT);
5191| $schedule->setStatus(TrmInterviewSchedule::CONFIRMED);
5379| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::ASSIGNED_TO_THE_EVALUATOR);
5388| $evaluatorLiveInterviewScheduleInvitation->setStatus(EvaluatorLiveInterviewScheduleInvitation::PENDING);
5429| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::ASSIGNED_TO_THE_EVALUATOR);
5438| $evaluatorInvite->setStatus(EvaluatorLiveInterviewScheduleInvitation::PENDING);
5707| $schedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::CONFIRMED_BY_THE_CANDIDATE);
5831| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::ASSIGNED_TO_THE_EVALUATOR);
5964| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::ACCEPTANCE_OF_EVALUATOR_PENDING);
5975| $invitation->setStatus(EvaluatorLiveInterviewScheduleInvitation::REJECTED);
5983| $evaluatorInvitation->setStatus(EvaluatorLiveInterviewScheduleInvitation::PENDING);
6020| $activeServicePackageAddOn->setStatus(ServicePackageAddOn::ACTIVE);
6284| $activeServicePackageAddOn->setStatus(ServicePackageAddOn::ACTIVE);
6366| $invitation->setStatus(EvaluatorLiveInterviewScheduleInvitation::REJECTED);
6371| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus($status);
6426| $meetingPremiumEvaluator->setStatus(MeetingPremiumEvaluator::EVALUATOR_INVITATION_SENT);
File: src/Controller/MonitoredEvaluationController.php
Match lines: 8
69| $monitoredEvaluationSchedule->setStatus(MonitoredEvaluationSchedule::SENT_FOR_REPORT);
71| $task->setStatus('complete');
146| $monitoredEvaluationSchedule->setStatus(6);
152| $monitoredEvaluationSchedule->setStatus(5);
179| $evaluatorMonitoredEvaluationInvitation->setStatus(EvaluatorMonitoredEvaluationInvitation::DONE);
233| $monitoredEvaluationSchedule->setStatus($status);
752| $monitoredSchedule->setStatus(-2);
896| $task->setStatus('finished');
File: src/Controller/MonitoredEvaluationScheduleController.php
Match lines: 19
205| $monitoredEvaluationSchedule->setStatus(MonitoredEvaluationSchedule::EVALUATOR_NOT_ASSIGNED);
345| $v->setStatus(MonitoredEvaluationSchedule::TRUNCATED_INTERVIEW);
474| $monitoredEvaluationSchedule->setStatus(MonitoredEvaluationSchedule::CHANGE_EVALUATOR);
481| $invitation->setStatus(EvaluatorLiveInterviewScheduleInvitation::REJECTED);
547| $monitoredEvaluationSchedule->setStatus(MonitoredEvaluationSchedule::EVALUATOR_REQUIRED);
554| $invitation->setStatus(EvaluatorLiveInterviewScheduleInvitation::REJECTED);
640| $monitoredEvaluationSchedule->setStatus($status);
644| $monitoredEvaluationSchedule->setStatus(MonitoredEvaluationSchedule::EVALUATION_COMPLETE);
659| $evaluatorMonitoredEvaluationInvitation->setStatus(EvaluatorMonitoredEvaluationInvitation::DONE);
705| $monitoredEvaluationSchedule->setStatus(MonitoredEvaluationSchedule::SENT_FOR_REPORT);
848| $monitoredEvaluationSchedule->setStatus(MonitoredEvaluationSchedule::EVALUATION_PENDING);
879| $monitoredEvaluationSchedule->setStatus(MonitoredEvaluationSchedule::EVALUATION_PENDING);
881| $monitoredEvaluationSchedule->setStatus(MonitoredEvaluationSchedule::ACCEPTANCE_OF_EVALUATOR_PENDING);
898| $evaluatorMonitoredEvaluationInvitation->setStatus(EvaluatorMonitoredEvaluationInvitation::PENDING);
977| ->setStatus(ServicePackageAddOn::ACTIVE)
1042| $monitoredEvaluationSchedule->setStatus(MonitoredEvaluationSchedule::EVALUATOR_REQUIRED);
1236| $activeServicePackageAddOn->setStatus(ServicePackageAddOn::ACTIVE);
1286| $monitoredEvaluationSchedule->setStatus(MonitoredEvaluationSchedule::ASSIGNED_TO_THE_EVALUATOR);
1422| $meetingPremiumEvaluator->setStatus(MeetingPremiumEvaluator::EVALUATOR_INVITATION_SENT);
File: src/Controller/MyPlanController.php
Match lines: 4
1574| $additionalService->setStatus('active');
1628| $addon->setStatus('active');
1802| $additionalService->setStatus("disable");
2000| $planContract->setStatus($result['status']);
File: src/Controller/NpsController.php
Match lines: 2
1291| $media->setStatus($data['status']);
3150| $addon->setStatus('active');
File: src/Controller/OffboardingMemberController.php
Match lines: 10
136| $offboardingMember->setStatus($status);
315| $flowInstanceMember->setStatus(\App\Entity\FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
325| $flowInstance->setStatus(\App\Entity\FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
434| $offboardingMember->setStatus($status);
547| $member->setStatus(
606| $member->setStatus(
3609| $member->setStatus($statusEncerrado);
3782| $flowInstanceMember->setStatus('approved');
4341| $flowInstanceMember->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
4375| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
File: src/Controller/OnboardingMemberController.php
Match lines: 3
159| $onboardingMember->setStatus($status);
2590| $member->setStatus($statusEntity);
3747| $flowInstanceMember->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
File: src/Controller/OrganogramaController.php
Match lines: 9
2140| $simulation->setStatus('draft');
3265| $jobTemplate->setStatus('active');
3346| $simulationRole->setStatus('active');
4805| $simRole->setStatus('active');
5231| $assistantSimRole->setStatus('active');
7348| $simRole->setStatus('active');
8253| $organogram->setStatus('submitted');
8558| $organogram->setStatus('approved');
8672| $organogram->setStatus('rejected');
File: src/Controller/PPSController.php
Match lines: 5
1145| $override->setStatus(WorksheetOverride::STATUS_EXCEPTION_PENDING);
1654| $organogram->setStatus('draft');
1705| $simRole->setStatus('active');
2574| $simRole->setStatus('active');
2689| $simRole->setStatus('active');
File: src/Controller/PayablesController.php
Match lines: 18
1561| $supplier->setStatus('1');
1862| $payable->setStatus($initialStatus !== '' ? $initialStatus : 'draft');
1964| $currentPayable->setStatus($payable->getStatus());
2479| $payable->setStatus('open');
2481| $payable->setStatus('draft');
2487| $payable->setStatus('open');
2687| $newInstallment->setStatus($baseInstallment->getStatus());
3572| $payable->setStatus($statusToPersist);
3584| $entryInstallment->setStatus($statusToPersist);
3633| $payroll->setStatus('paga');
3686| $p->setStatus('pagamento_cancelado');
3861| $newPayable->setStatus('draft'); // Duplicação inicia como rascunho
4136| $relatedInstallment->setStatus('open');
4154| $payable->setStatus('paid');
4171| $ph->setStatus('paga'); // SHEET_STATUS_PAID
4208| $ph->setStatus('paga');
6785| $p->setStatus('open');
8022| $payable->setStatus($statusMap[$statusValue] ?? 'draft');
File: src/Controller/PayrollController.php
Match lines: 1
686| $payroll->setStatus('Emitida');
File: src/Controller/ProcessChatController.php
Match lines: 3
109| $chat->setStatus(ProcessChat::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
132| $chat->setStatus(ProcessChat::STATUS_PENDING);
2366| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
File: src/Controller/ProcessController.php
Match lines: 10
2730| $contratoExistente->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_CONTRATADO);
2739| $contratação->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_CONTRATADO);
5496| $process->setStatus('Ativo');
5543| $processo->setStatus("Close"); // cerrado
6078| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(-2);
6795| $processos->setStatus(Process::STATUS_ACTIVE);
6813| // $processos->setStatus("Ativo");
7773| $contratacao->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_NAO_PASSOU); // -1 indica "não selecionado"
8540| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
8592| $schedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATOR_NOT_ASSIGNED);
File: src/Controller/ProcessNewController.php
Match lines: 17
349| $process->setStatus($status);
795| $document->setStatus(2);
915| ->setStatus($document->getStatus())
950| $skill->setStatus($status);
953| $skill->setStatus(0);
984| ->setStatus($skill->getStatus());
1012| $setSkill->setStatus($this->security->getUser()->isSuperAdmin() ? $status : 0);
1084| $setSkill->setStatus($status);
1145| $skill->setStatus($status);
1147| $skill->setStatus(0);
1200| ->setStatus($skillSet->getStatus())
1244| $Benefit->setStatus($status);
1246| $Benefit->setStatus(0);
1281| $benefit->setStatus($status);
1283| $benefit->setStatus($benefit->getStatus());
1321| ->setStatus($benefit->getStatus());
1400| $process->setStatus('active');
File: src/Controller/ProcessNewDashboardController.php
Match lines: 9
243| $contratoExistente->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_CONTRATADO);
251| $contratacao->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_CONTRATADO);
739| $person->setStatus(TrmPerson::STATUS_ACTIVE);
805| $contract->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_CONVOCADO);
823| $member->setStatus('classified');
954| $contract->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_EM_ANDAMENTO);
1002| $contract->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_CONTRATADO);
1011| $member->setStatus('approved');
1087| $contract->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_EM_ANDAMENTO);
File: src/Controller/ProcessosTrabalhistasController.php
Match lines: 1
217| $processo->setStatus('EXCLUIDO');
File: src/Controller/Products/AssessmentFlowController.php
Match lines: 1
310| ->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION)
File: src/Controller/Products/CrmBpmnController.php
Match lines: 1
428| $member->setStatus('in_progress');
File: src/Controller/ProfessionalAssessmentController.php
Match lines: 5
1143| ->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION)
1327| ->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION)
1508| $invitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
1618| ->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION)
5087| $invite->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
File: src/Controller/ProfessionalProjectController.php
Match lines: 10
1114| $task->setStatus(!empty($data['status']) ? (int)$data['status'] : 1);
1618| $task->setStatus(4);
1911| $task->setStatus((int)$data['status']);
2096| $new->setStatus($orig->getStatus());
2331| $task->setStatus((int)$taskData['status']);
2432| $subtask->setStatus(0);
2468| $subtask->setStatus($status);
2583| $new->setStatus(null);
3095| $automation->setStatus('active');
3532| $professionalAutomation->setStatus($status);
File: src/Controller/ProjectsAutomationsController.php
Match lines: 3
223| $automation->setStatus('active');
310| $newAutomation->setStatus('active');
741| $automation->setStatus($status);
File: src/Controller/ProjectsNewController.php
Match lines: 9
1777| $task->setStatus(3);
2684| $task->setStatus(
3074| $subtask->setStatus(0);
3365| $task->setStatus(4);
3786| $task->setStatus($taskData['status']);
4054| $newTask->setStatus($originalTask->getStatus());
4165| $newTask->setStatus(null);
4294| $task->setStatus($data['status']);
4825| $subtask->setStatus($status);
File: src/Controller/PulseSurveyController.php
Match lines: 2
224| $survey->setStatus($data['status'] ?? 1);
369| $surveyParticipant->setStatus('pending');
File: src/Controller/ReceivablesController.php
Match lines: 11
2607| $receivable->setStatus($this->mapReceivableStatusToPersist($initialApiStatus));
2729| $currentReceivable->setStatus($receivable->getStatus());
3448| $newInstallment->setStatus($baseInstallment->getStatus());
4061| $receivable->setStatus($statusToPersist);
4076| $entryInstallment->setStatus($statusToPersist);
4213| $clone->setStatus('draft');
4327| $relatedInstallment->setStatus($this->mapReceivableStatusForFlowToPersist('open'));
4337| $receivable->setStatus('received');
4496| $test->setStatus('ativo');
5015| $receivable->setStatus($getCell('status') ?: 'draft');
5575| $ar->setStatus($this->mapReceivableStatusForFlowToPersist('open'));
File: src/Controller/RecommendationsNetworkController.php
Match lines: 2
671| $old_recommended->setStatus(1);
690| $questionaire->setStatus($final_status);
File: src/Controller/SalaryDataController.php
Match lines: 1
788| $processDepartment->setStatus('');
File: src/Controller/ScoreController.php
Match lines: 3
149| $goal->setStatus(Goal::STATUS_OPEN);
209| $goal->setStatus(Goal::STATUS_OPEN);
270| $goal->setStatus(Goal::STATUS_FINISHED);
File: src/Controller/SelectionProcessController.php
Match lines: 23
675| $process->setStatus($status);
799| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE); // ✅ Criar já como ativo
1186| $foundInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
1203| $foundInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
1811| $process->setStatus($status);
1965| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE); // ✅ Criar já como ativo
2213| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
2357| $process->setStatus($status);
2368| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_COMPLETED);
2740| $contracts->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_CLASSIFICADO);
2750| $contracts->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_CONVOCADO);
2832| $member->setStatus('approved');
2844| $contracts->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_CONTRATADO);
2925| $member->setStatus('classified');
2941| $contracts->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_CLASSIFICADO);
3023| $contracts->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_EM_ANDAMENTO);
3929| $member->setStatus(\App\Entity\FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
4046| $process->setStatus($status);
5385| $process->setStatus($data['status'] ?? Process::STATUS_ACTIVE);
5598| $invitation->setStatus(\App\Entity\UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
5854| $process->setStatus(Process::STATUS_ACTIVE);
5874| $fi->setStatus('active');
5925| $process->setStatus(Process::STATUS_CLOSE);
File: src/Controller/ServicePackageController.php
Match lines: 6
291| $customService->setStatus('Pendente'); // Definir status inicial como 'Pendente'
851| $addOn->setStatus('pending'); // Status inicial
892| $ServicePackageAddOn->setStatus('pending');
1027| $newContract->setStatus($result['status']);
1043| $ServicePackageAddOn->setStatus('active');
1109| $ServicePackageAddOn->setStatus('inactive');
File: src/Controller/SimulationController.php
Match lines: 5
146| $simulationRole->setStatus('active');
502| $child->setStatus('removed');
507| $simulationRole->setStatus('removed');
627| $newSimulation->setStatus('draft');
763| $newRole->setStatus($sourceRole->getStatus());
File: src/Controller/SpacesControlController.php
Match lines: 9
1274| $incident->setStatus(MaintenanceIncident::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
1409| $incident->setStatus($data['status']);
1896| $existing->setStatus(\App\Entity\FloorQRCode::STATUS_DISABLED);
1945| $qrCode->setStatus(\App\Entity\FloorQRCode::STATUS_EXPIRED);
1997| $qrCode->setStatus(\App\Entity\FloorQRCode::STATUS_EXPIRED);
2023| $checkin->setStatus(\App\Entity\FloorCheckin::STATUS_VALIDATED);
2077| $qrCode->setStatus(\App\Entity\FloorQRCode::STATUS_EXPIRED);
2125| $qrCode->setStatus(\App\Entity\FloorQRCode::STATUS_DISABLED);
2203| $qrCode->setStatus(\App\Entity\FloorQRCode::STATUS_EXPIRED);
File: src/Controller/SpecialistController.php
Match lines: 60
854| $specialist->setStatus($currentStatus);
868| $interview->setStatus($interviewStatus);
964| $specialist->setStatus($currentStatus);
974| $interview->setStatus($interviewStatus);
1182| $accountsHistoricalData->setStatus('Pendente');
1316| $accountsHistoricalData->setStatus('Aguardando confirmação');
2537| $otherAvaliation->setStatus('Inativo');
2546| $evaluatorPanel->setStatus('Andamento');
2614| $evaluatorPanel->setStatus('Ignorado');
2719| $evaluatorPanel->setStatus('Requer Validação');
2732| $evaluatorPanel->setStatus('Finalizadas');
2742| $evaluatorPanel->setStatus('Finalizadas');
2949| $evaluatorPanel->setStatus('Canceladas');
2954| $evaluatorPanel->setStatus('Canceladas');
2973| $otherAvaliation->setStatus('Ativo');
3567| $schedule->setStatus(
3578| $requestItem->setStatus(
3613| $specialistRequest->setStatus(TrmSpecialistInterviewRequest::STATUS_IGNORED);
3628| $schedule->setStatus(TrmInterviewSchedule::EVALUATOR_NOT_ASSIGNED);
3677| $otherAvaliation->setStatus('Inativo');
3690| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(
3704| $invitation->setStatus($index === 0
3712| $interviewPanel->setStatus('Andamento');
3788| $interviewPanel->setStatus('Ignorado');
3796| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATOR_NOT_ASSIGNED);
3814| $invitation->setStatus(EvaluatorLiveInterviewScheduleInvitation::REJECTED);
4110| $interviewerPanel->setStatus('Refazer');
4160| $evaluatorPanel->setStatus('Refazer');
4285| $interviewerPanel->setStatus('Validada');
4314| $evaluatorPanel->setStatus('Validada');
4699| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::INVITATION_SENT);
4701| $interviewerPanel->setStatus("Proposta Enviada");
4751| $interviewerPanel->setStatus($status);
4958| $interviewerPanel->setStatus('Requer Validação');
4967| $interviewerPanel->setStatus('Concluído');
5006| $interviewerPanel->setStatus('Data Agendada');
5032| $proposedInterview->setStatus('Canceladas');
5040| $otherAvaliation->setStatus('Ativo');
5132| $interviewerPanel->setStatus('Concluído');
5306| $interview->setStatus($currentStatus);
5599| $specialist->setStatus(Specialist::STATUS_APAGADO, $type);
5656| $specialist->setStatus(Specialist::STATUS_APAGADO, $typeToRemove);
5695| $specialist->setStatus($currentStatus);
5726| $interview->setStatus($interviewStatus);
5834| $specialist->setStatus($currentStatus);
5908| $specialist->setStatus($currentStatus);
5929| $interview->setStatus(Specialist::STATUS_APROVADO);
5974| $specialist->setStatus($currentStatus);
5989| $interview->setStatus($interviewStatus);
6055| $specialist->setStatus($currentStatus);
6084| $interview->setStatus($currentStatus);
6135| $specialist->setStatus($currentStatus);
6151| $interview->setStatus($currentStatus);
6338| $liveInterview->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATOR_NOT_ASSIGNED);
6414| $monitoredEvaluation->setStatus(MonitoredEvaluationSchedule::EVALUATOR_NOT_ASSIGNED);
6671| $existingSpecialist->setStatus($currentStatus);
6680| $specialistInterview->setStatus($interviewStatus);
6718| $existingSpecialist->setStatus($currentStatus);
6742| $existingSpecialist->setStatus($currentStatus);
6802| $specialist->setStatus($initialStatus);
File: src/Controller/SpecificEvaluationController.php
Match lines: 7
1162| $result->setStatus('');
1173| $evaluationResult->setStatus('');
1284| $task->setStatus('complete');
1295| $otk->setStatus('complete');
1378| $evaluationResult->setStatus($answerStatus);
1751| $result->setStatus('');
1761| $evaluationResult->setStatus('');
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 12
1899| $event->setStatus(EventStatusEnum::EM_INVESTIGACAO);
2585| $aut->setStatus('ativa');
2784| ->setStatus(SsmaAutorizacaoDocumento::STATUS_PENDENTE);
2889| $doc->setStatus($acao === 'aprovar' ? SsmaAutorizacaoDocumento::STATUS_APROVADO : SsmaAutorizacaoDocumento::STATUS_REPROVADO)
6692| $occurrence->setStatus($status);
7447| $occurrence->setStatus('finalizada');
7509| $event->setStatus(SsmaEvent::STATUS_CONCLUIDO);
7810| $task->setStatus(1);
8019| $task->setStatus(1);
9559| $inspection->setStatus('finalizada');
23686| $abordagem->setStatus($statusReq);
24451| $nova->setStatus(SsmaAbordagem::STATUS_RASCUNHO);
File: src/Controller/SstConfigController.php
Match lines: 1
148| $conn->setStatus(SstEntityConnection::STATUS_PENDING);
File: src/Controller/SstExamController.php
Match lines: 1
355| $result->setStatus($status);
File: src/Controller/StructuralResearchController.php
Match lines: 16
167| $structuralResearchCopy->setStatus($structuralResearch->getStatus());
1151| $structuralResearchUser->setStatus(StructuralResearchUser::PENDING);
1204| $structuralResearchUser->setStatus(StructuralResearchUser::FINISHED);
1354| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(-2);
1426| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(-2);
1537| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
1910| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
3473| $questionnaire->setStatus(false);
3511| $questionnaire->setStatus($statusBool);
4137| $participant->setStatus('completed');
4163| $structuralResearchUser->setStatus(\App\Entity\StructuralResearchUser::FINISHED);
4174| $participant->setStatus('completed');
4351| $questionnaire->setStatus(false);
4411| $questionnaire->setStatus(true);
4707| $participant->setStatus('completed');
4876| $participant->setStatus('completed');
File: src/Controller/StructuralResearchSurveyController.php
Match lines: 7
512| $questionnaire->setStatus(false);
544| $questionnaire->setStatus(true);
764| $survey->setStatus($requestedStatus === 1 ? 1 : 0);
873| $surveyParticipant->setStatus('pending');
1187| $surveyCopy->setStatus($survey->getStatus() ?? 1);
1225| $participantCopy->setStatus($participant->getStatus() ?? 'pending');
1320| $surveyParticipant->setStatus('pending');
File: src/Controller/SubsidiaryCompanyController.php
Match lines: 2
419| $subsidiaryInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
507| $subsidiaryInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
File: src/Controller/SuppliersController.php
Match lines: 4
735| $supplier->setStatus($this->normalizeSupplierStatus($status));
2470| $supplier->setStatus($this->normalizeSupplierStatus($data['status'] ?? null));
3081| $supplier->setStatus($this->normalizeSupplierStatus($data['status']));
3315| $supplier->setStatus($this->normalizeSupplierStatus($newStatus));
File: src/Controller/TemplatesController.php
Match lines: 8
2057| $existingSpecialist->setStatus($currentStatus);
2066| $specialistInterview->setStatus($interviewStatus);
2104| $existingSpecialist->setStatus($currentStatus);
2128| $existingSpecialist->setStatus($currentStatus);
2190| $specialist->setStatus($initialStatus);
3847| $assessment->setStatus('inativa');
3849| $assessment->setStatus('ativa');
4856| $pesquisa->setStatus('ativa');
File: src/Controller/TemplatesWhatsAppController.php
Match lines: 4
237| $template->setStatus($response["data"]["status"]);
617| $template->setStatus("WAITING");
654| $template->setStatus("WAITING");
708| $template->setStatus($data["status"]);
File: src/Controller/TrainingChapterController.php
Match lines: 2
71| ->setStatus($status)
146| ->setStatus($status)
File: src/Controller/TrainingController.php
Match lines: 11
545| $processEntity->setStatus('close');
602| $processEntity->setStatus('Ativo'); // ou null se for o padrão
2027| $process->setStatus("Ativo");
4111| $process->setStatus('Ativo');
4646| $ownerParticipant->setStatus('active');
4670| $participant->setStatus('active');
4680| $existingParticipant->setStatus('active');
5286| $newModule->setStatus($originalModule->getStatus());
5311| $newChapter->setStatus($originalChapter->getStatus());
5357| $globalProcess->setStatus("Ativo");
5543| $process->setStatus('Ativo');
File: src/Controller/TrainingModuleController.php
Match lines: 7
221| $module->setStatus($data['status']);
488| $module->setStatus($status);
1690| $newModule->setStatus($newStatus);
1710| $newChapter->setStatus($v->getStatus());
1742| $globalProcess->setStatus(Process::STATUS_ACTIVE);
4474| $task->setStatus('');
4597| $chapter->setStatus(1); // Active by default
File: src/Controller/TrainingModuleProgressController.php
Match lines: 1
164| $process->setStatus(Process::STATUS_ACTIVE);
File: src/Controller/UnityGravaController.php
Match lines: 15
938| $pendingTask->setStatus('complete'); // Marcar como completo
1266| $pendingTask->setStatus('complete'); // Marcar como completo
1943| $task->setStatus('complete');
2290| $pendingTask->setStatus('complete'); // Marcar como completo
2620| $pendingTask->setStatus('complete'); // Marcar como completo
2876| $pendingTask->setStatus('complete');
3041| $pendingTask->setStatus('complete');
3259| $pendingTask->setStatus('complete');
3623| $pendingTask->setStatus('complete'); // Marcar como completo
3970| $pendingTask->setStatus('complete'); // Marcar como completo
4293| $pendingTask->setStatus('complete'); // Marcar como completo
4616| $pendingTask->setStatus('complete'); // Marcar como completo
4939| $pendingTask->setStatus('complete'); // Marcar como completo
5421| $pendingTask->setStatus('complete'); // Marcar como completo
5845| $pendingTask->setStatus('complete'); // Marcar como completo
File: src/Controller/UserController.php
Match lines: 20
398| $schedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATOR_NOT_ASSIGNED);
796| $invitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
917| $contract->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_EM_ANDAMENTO);
922| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
1062| $contract->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_EM_ANDAMENTO);
1093| $schedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATOR_NOT_ASSIGNED);
1148| $refer->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
1155| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
1250| $invitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
1431| $contract->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_EM_ANDAMENTO);
1462| $schedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATOR_NOT_ASSIGNED);
1738| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
5325| $contratacao->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_CONTRATADO);
5329| $contratacao->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_CONTRATADO);
5406| $contratacao->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_NAO_CONTRATADO);
5410| $contratacao->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_NAO_CONTRATADO);
5605| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(-2);
5687| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(-2);
5868| $invitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
5920| $contracts->setStatus(0);
File: src/Controller/UserProcessFeedbackController.php
Match lines: 5
181| $contract->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_DESISTIU);
264| $contract->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_EM_ANDAMENTO);
430| $schedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATOR_NOT_ASSIGNED);
598| $schedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATION_PENDING);
623| $schedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::CONFIRMED_BY_THE_CANDIDATE);
File: src/Controller/WelfareAssessmentController.php
Match lines: 3
1072| ->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION)
1218| ->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION)
1302| $invitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
File: src/Controller/WelfareHubController.php
Match lines: 6
2204| $creditRequest->setStatus(CreditsRequests::STATUS_APPROVED);
2331| $creditRequest->setStatus(CreditsRequests::STATUS_PENDING);
2783| $consultation->setStatus('Agendado');
2969| $consultation->setStatus(SpecialistHealthConsult::STATUS_REAGENDADO);
3030| $consultation->setStatus(SpecialistHealthConsult::STATUS_CANCELADO);
3554| $consultation->setStatus('Concluído');
File: src/DataFixtures/BudgetDemoEnrichFixtures.php
Match lines: 1
46| $parentCc->setStatus('1');
File: src/DataFixtures/BudgetDemoStatusesFixtures.php
Match lines: 1
71| $budget->setStatus($status);
File: src/Entity/AccountPayable.php
Match lines: 1
544| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/AccountReceivable.php
Match lines: 1
391| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/AccountsHistoricalData.php
Match lines: 1
218| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/Agent.php
Match lines: 1
87| public function setStatus(?string $status): self
File: src/Entity/AgentIdentityResolutionPending.php
Match lines: 1
215| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/AiCommitteeBrainstormEvidence.php
Match lines: 1
209| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/AiCommitteeFile.php
Match lines: 1
130| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/AiCommitteeSession.php
Match lines: 1
395| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/AiTrainingChapter.php
Match lines: 1
215| public function setStatus(?string $status): self
File: src/Entity/AiTrainingModule.php
Match lines: 1
256| public function setStatus(?string $status): self
File: src/Entity/AsaasCustomer.php
Match lines: 1
231| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/AsaasPayment.php
Match lines: 1
300| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/AsaasSubscription.php
Match lines: 1
256| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/Assessment360.php
Match lines: 1
151| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/Ata/ProjectAta.php
Match lines: 1
196| public function setStatus(string $status): self { $this->status = $status; return $this; }
File: src/Entity/BankAccount.php
Match lines: 1
197| public function setStatus(bool $status): self
File: src/Entity/BankReturn.php
Match lines: 1
256| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/Benefit.php
Match lines: 1
108| public function setStatus(?int $status): self
File: src/Entity/Budget.php
Match lines: 1
175| public function setStatus(string $status): self { $this->status = $status; return $this; }
File: src/Entity/CalendarEvent.php
Match lines: 1
408| public function setStatus(?int $status): self
File: src/Entity/CandidateSession.php
Match lines: 4
172| public function setStatus(string $status): self
316| $this->setStatus(self::STATUS_COMPLETED);
324| $this->setStatus(self::STATUS_TERMINATED);
331| $this->setStatus(self::STATUS_EXPIRED);
File: src/Entity/ChartImport.php
Match lines: 1
207| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/ChatConversationParticipant.php
Match lines: 1
110| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/CnabRemittance.php
Match lines: 1
142| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/CnabRemittanceItem.php
Match lines: 1
190| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/CnabRemittanceRegistry.php
Match lines: 1
204| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/CompanyArea.php
Match lines: 1
194| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/CompanyFeaturesAddons.php
Match lines: 1
153| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/CompensationCycle.php
Match lines: 1
345| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/CompensationProposal.php
Match lines: 1
379| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/Contract/ProjectContract.php
Match lines: 1
138| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/Contractor/ContractorProviderCompanyRequirement.php
Match lines: 1
189| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/Contracts.php
Match lines: 1
119| public function setStatus(int $status): self
File: src/Entity/CostCenter.php
Match lines: 1
246| public function setStatus(string $status): self { $this->status = $status; return $this; }
File: src/Entity/CreditsRequests.php
Match lines: 1
109| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/CrmLeads.php
Match lines: 1
634| public function setStatus($status)
File: src/Entity/CrmProduct.php
Match lines: 1
129| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/CrmServices.php
Match lines: 1
125| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/CulturalHubBlogPost.php
Match lines: 1
173| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/CulturalHubNewsletter.php
Match lines: 1
215| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/Customer.php
Match lines: 1
315| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/Document.php
Match lines: 3
92| ->setStatus($request->get('status', $this->status))
174| $this->setStatus(1);
190| public function setStatus(int $status): self
File: src/Entity/EsocialEvents.php
Match lines: 1
261| public function setStatus($status): void
File: src/Entity/EvaluationResult.php
Match lines: 1
119| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/EvaluatorLiveInterviewScheduleInvitation.php
Match lines: 1
108| public function setStatus(?int $status): self
File: src/Entity/EvaluatorMonitoredEvaluationInvitation.php
Match lines: 1
107| public function setStatus(?int $status): self
File: src/Entity/EvaluatorPanel.php
Match lines: 1
71| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/ExceptionRequest.php
Match lines: 1
196| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/FloorCheckin.php
Match lines: 1
164| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/FloorQRCode.php
Match lines: 1
164| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/FlowAutomationRequest.php
Match lines: 1
171| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/FlowInstance.php
Match lines: 1
197| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/FlowInstanceMember.php
Match lines: 1
271| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/Goal.php
Match lines: 1
1177| public function setStatus(int $status): self
File: src/Entity/GoalActionPlanItem.php
Match lines: 1
172| public function setStatus(int $status): self
File: src/Entity/GoalDevelopmentAction.php
Match lines: 1
163| public function setStatus(int $status): self
File: src/Entity/GovernanceAuthorization.php
Match lines: 1
188| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/GovernanceAuthorizationDocument.php
Match lines: 1
189| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/GovernanceBadge.php
Match lines: 1
221| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/GovernanceCaseRecord.php
Match lines: 1
221| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/GovernanceGrcCase.php
Match lines: 1
326| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/InnovationArea.php
Match lines: 1
147| public function setStatus(int $status): self
File: src/Entity/IntermediateCrm.php
Match lines: 1
183| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/Interview.php
Match lines: 1
137| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/InterviewAnswer.php
Match lines: 1
202| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/InterviewInvite.php
Match lines: 4
126| public function setStatus(string $status): self
290| $this->setStatus(self::STATUS_USED);
299| $this->setStatus(self::STATUS_REVOKED);
306| $this->setStatus(self::STATUS_EXPIRED);
File: src/Entity/InterviewMedia.php
Match lines: 1
236| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/InterviewResearcher.php
Match lines: 1
114| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/InterviewTemplate.php
Match lines: 1
240| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/InterviewerPanel.php
Match lines: 1
83| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/JobInterview.php
Match lines: 1
140| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/JobInterviewAnswer.php
Match lines: 1
205| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/JobInterviewMedia.php
Match lines: 1
246| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/JobInterviewTemplate.php
Match lines: 1
215| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/JobStatus.php
Match lines: 1
62| public function setStatus(string $status, array $extra = []): void
File: src/Entity/KnowledgeArea.php
Match lines: 1
90| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/License.php
Match lines: 1
104| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/LicenseCollective.php
Match lines: 1
239| public function setStatus(?string $status): self
File: src/Entity/LicenseCollectiveType.php
Match lines: 1
88| public function setStatus(?string $status): self
File: src/Entity/LicenseMembers.php
Match lines: 1
211| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/LicenseTeams.php
Match lines: 1
146| public function setStatus(?string $status): self
File: src/Entity/LiveInterviewSchedule.php
Match lines: 1
349| public function setStatus(?int $status): self
File: src/Entity/MaintenanceIncident.php
Match lines: 1
201| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/MeetingPremiumEvaluator.php
Match lines: 1
141| public function setStatus(?int $status): self
File: src/Entity/MemberImportBatch.php
Match lines: 1
157| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/MemberImportBatchRow.php
Match lines: 1
126| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/MetaHuman/Rag/RagDocumentMetadata.php
Match lines: 1
223| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/MetaHumanMemberSheetWizardState.php
Match lines: 1
166| public function setStatus(string $status): void
File: src/Entity/MonitoredEvaluationSchedule.php
Match lines: 1
338| public function setStatus(?int $status): self
File: src/Entity/NpsAnswer.php
Match lines: 1
203| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/NpsInvite.php
Match lines: 4
129| public function setStatus(string $status): self
293| $this->setStatus(self::STATUS_USED);
302| $this->setStatus(self::STATUS_REVOKED);
309| $this->setStatus(self::STATUS_EXPIRED);
File: src/Entity/NpsMedia.php
Match lines: 1
228| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/NpsSurvey.php
Match lines: 1
153| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/NpsTemplate.php
Match lines: 1
175| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/OffboardingMember.php
Match lines: 1
264| public function setStatus(?OffboardingMemberStatus $status): self
File: src/Entity/OnboardingMember.php
Match lines: 1
208| public function setStatus(OnboardingMemberStatus $status): self
File: src/Entity/OnboardingMemberStatus.php
Match lines: 1
41| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/OntologyAlertReview.php
Match lines: 1
331| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/Organogram.php
Match lines: 1
183| public function setStatus(?string $status): self
File: src/Entity/ParticipantSession.php
Match lines: 4
173| public function setStatus(string $status): self
327| $this->setStatus(self::STATUS_COMPLETED);
335| $this->setStatus(self::STATUS_TERMINATED);
342| $this->setStatus(self::STATUS_EXPIRED);
File: src/Entity/Payroll.php
Match lines: 1
305| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/PermanenceRestructuringApproval.php
Match lines: 1
129| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/PlanContracts.php
Match lines: 1
114| public function setStatus(?string $status): self
File: src/Entity/Process.php
Match lines: 1
514| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/ProcessChat.php
Match lines: 1
136| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/ProfessionalProjectAutomation.php
Match lines: 1
87| public function setStatus(?string $status): self
File: src/Entity/ProfessionalProjectSubtask.php
Match lines: 1
59| public function setStatus(int $status): self
File: src/Entity/ProfessionalProjectTask.php
Match lines: 1
219| public function setStatus(?int $status): self
File: src/Entity/ProjectAutomation.php
Match lines: 1
79| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/ProjectSubtasks.php
Match lines: 1
58| public function setStatus(int $status): self
File: src/Entity/ProjectTaskModels.php
Match lines: 1
86| public function setStatus(?int $status): self
File: src/Entity/ProjectTasks.php
Match lines: 1
216| public function setStatus(?int $status): self
File: src/Entity/ProposedAvaliations.php
Match lines: 1
321| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/ProposedInterviews.php
Match lines: 1
406| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/Questionaire.php
Match lines: 1
196| public function setStatus(int $status): self
File: src/Entity/QuestionnaireAssessment360.php
Match lines: 1
126| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/Questions.php
Match lines: 1
153| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/ServicePackageAddOn.php
Match lines: 1
113| public function setStatus(?string $status): self
File: src/Entity/SetSkill.php
Match lines: 1
144| public function setStatus(int $status): self
File: src/Entity/SimulationJobTemplate.php
Match lines: 1
517| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/SimulationRole.php
Match lines: 1
286| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/Skill.php
Match lines: 1
117| public function setStatus($status): self
File: src/Entity/SpaceBooking.php
Match lines: 1
201| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/Specialist.php
Match lines: 1
883| public function setStatus($status, ?int $type = null)
File: src/Entity/SpecialistGoal.php
Match lines: 1
177| public function setStatus(?string $status): static
File: src/Entity/SpecialistHealthConsult.php
Match lines: 1
121| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/SpecialistInterview.php
Match lines: 1
221| public function setStatus($value, ?int $key = null): self
File: src/Entity/SsmaAbordagem.php
Match lines: 1
386| public function setStatus(string $v): self { $this->status = $v; return $this; }
File: src/Entity/SsmaEvent.php
Match lines: 1
189| public function setStatus(string $status): self { $this->status = $status; return $this; }
File: src/Entity/SsmaInspection.php
Match lines: 1
307| public function setStatus(?string $status): self { $this->status = $status; return $this; }
File: src/Entity/SsmaMetaAbonoRequest.php
Match lines: 1
205| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/SsmaOccurrence.php
Match lines: 1
120| public function setStatus(string $status): self { $this->status = $status; return $this; }
File: src/Entity/SsmaRefusalRight.php
Match lines: 1
199| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/SstEntityConnection.php
Match lines: 1
136| public function setStatus(string $status): static
File: src/Entity/SstExamRequest.php
Match lines: 1
174| public function setStatus(string $status): static
File: src/Entity/SstExamResult.php
Match lines: 1
125| public function setStatus(string $status): static
File: src/Entity/StructuralResearch.php
Match lines: 1
396| public function setStatus(bool $status): self
File: src/Entity/StructuralResearchParticipant.php
Match lines: 1
79| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/StructuralResearchSurvey.php
Match lines: 2
214| public function setStatus(bool $status): self
1085| $this->setStatus(false);
File: src/Entity/StructuralResearchUser.php
Match lines: 1
118| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/Supplier.php
Match lines: 1
399| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/Tasks.php
Match lines: 1
349| public function setStatus(?string $status): self
File: src/Entity/TimeManegement/Tenant/GeneratedLink.php
Match lines: 1
172| public function setStatus(bool $status): self
File: src/Entity/TimeManegement/Tenant/HitSpotTime.php
Match lines: 1
278| public function setStatus(?string $status): self
File: src/Entity/TimeManegement/Tenant/Occurrence.php
Match lines: 1
155| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/TimeManegement/Tenant/WorkSchedule.php
Match lines: 1
182| public function setStatus(string $status): self { $this->status = $status; return $this; }
File: src/Entity/TrainingChapter.php
Match lines: 1
380| public function setStatus(?string $status): self
File: src/Entity/TrainingModule.php
Match lines: 1
406| public function setStatus(?string $status): self
File: src/Entity/Trm/TrmCampaign.php
Match lines: 1
160| public function setStatus(string $status): self { $this->status = $status; return $this; }
File: src/Entity/Trm/TrmCommunity.php
Match lines: 1
131| public function setStatus(string $status): self { $this->status = $status; return $this; }
File: src/Entity/Trm/TrmConsentPreference.php
Match lines: 1
114| public function setStatus(string $status): self { $this->status = $status; return $this; }
File: src/Entity/Trm/TrmInteraction.php
Match lines: 1
283| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/Trm/TrmInterviewSchedule.php
Match lines: 1
209| public function setStatus(?int $status): self
File: src/Entity/Trm/TrmPerson.php
Match lines: 1
225| public function setStatus(?string $status): self { $this->status = $status; return $this; }
File: src/Entity/Trm/TrmTask.php
Match lines: 1
190| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/TrmSpecialistInterviewRequest.php
Match lines: 1
137| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/UserInvitation.php
Match lines: 1
554| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/WhatsAppTemplate.php
Match lines: 1
192| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/WorkflowApprovalObservation.php
Match lines: 1
250| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/Entity/WorksheetOverride.php
Match lines: 1
276| public function setStatus(string $status): self
File: src/EventListener/AccountProfileListener.php
Match lines: 1
71| $invitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
File: src/EventListener/ActivityIndividualSpaceBlockListener.php
Match lines: 2
228| $booking->setStatus(SpaceBooking::STATUS_CONFIRMED);
285| $booking->setStatus(SpaceBooking::STATUS_CANCELLED);
File: src/EventListener/FlowStageEventListener.php
Match lines: 1
357| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
File: src/EventSubscriber/FeatureLimitSubscriber.php
Match lines: 1
2897| $contract->setStatus($documentData['status']);
File: src/MessageHandler/CheckAbsenceOccurrenceHandler.php
Match lines: 1
237| $hitSpotTime->setStatus('ausente');
File: src/MessageHandler/CreateDocumentMessageHandler.php
Match lines: 4
33| $this->jobStatusService->setStatus($message->getJobId(), 'processing');
39| $this->jobStatusService->setStatus(
53| $this->jobStatusService->setStatus($message->getJobId(), 'done', [
58| $this->jobStatusService->setStatus($message->getJobId(), 'error', [
File: src/MessageHandler/EnviarEventoMessageHandler.php
Match lines: 5
124| $evento->setStatus('erro no processamento');
148| $evento->setStatus('erro no processamento');
266| $evento->setStatus('erro no processamento');
307| $evento->setStatus('erro no processamento');
510| $eventoExcluido->setStatus('DELETED');
File: src/MessageHandler/RunAiCommitteeSessionMessageHandler.php
Match lines: 9
117| $session->setStatus('failed');
300| $session->setStatus('failed');
375| $session->setStatus('failed');
440| $session->setStatus('failed');
552| $session->setStatus('awaiting_evidence');
661| $session->setStatus('completed');
733| $session->setStatus('failed');
1112| $session->setStatus('failed');
1178| $session->setStatus('completed');
File: src/Repository/CrmLeadsRepository.php
Match lines: 3
370| $crmLeads->setStatus($statusLead);
546| $crmLeads->setStatus($statusLead);
548| $crmLeads->setStatus(null);
File: src/Repository/EsocialEventBatchRepository.php
Match lines: 1
104| $event->setStatus('enviado');
File: src/Repository/EsocialEventBatchResponseRepository.php
Match lines: 2
190| $currentEvent->setStatus('processado');
192| $currentEvent->setStatus('erro no processamento');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS1000EvtInfoEmpregadorRepository.php
Match lines: 1
97| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS1005EvtTabEstabRepository.php
Match lines: 1
106| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS1010EvtTabRubricaRepository.php
Match lines: 1
86| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS1020EvtTabLotacaoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
78| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS1070EvtTabProcessoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
73| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS1200EvtRemunRepository.php
Match lines: 1
71| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS1210EvtPgtosRepository.php
Match lines: 1
82| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS1280EvtInfoComplPerRepository.php
Match lines: 1
64| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS1298EvtReabreEvPerRepository.php
Match lines: 1
63| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS1299EvtFechaEvPerRepository.php
Match lines: 1
64| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2190EvtAdmPrelimRepository.php
Match lines: 1
65| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2200EvtAdmissaoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
65| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2205EvtAltCadastralRepository.php
Match lines: 1
61| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2206EvtAltContratualRepository.php
Match lines: 1
60| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2210EvtCATRepository.php
Match lines: 1
70| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2220EvtMonitRepository.php
Match lines: 1
74| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2221EvtExmToxMotRepository.php
Match lines: 1
69| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2230EvtAfastTempRepository.php
Match lines: 1
69| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2240EvtExpRiscoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
74| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2298EvtReintegrRepository.php
Match lines: 1
71| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
73| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2300EvtTsvInicioRepository.php
Match lines: 1
63| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2306EvtTsvAltContrRepository.php
Match lines: 1
68| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2399EvtTsvTerminoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
73| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2500EvtProcTrabRepository.php
Match lines: 1
57| $evento->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2501EvtContProcRepository.php
Match lines: 1
79| $evento->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS3000EvtExclusaoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
61| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS3500EvtExcProcTrabRepository.php
Match lines: 1
61| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/GoalDevelopmentActionRepository.php
Match lines: 2
156| $goalDevelopmentAction->setStatus(GoalDevelopmentAction::STATUS_OPEN);
252| $goalDevelopmentAction->setStatus(Goal::STATUS_OPEN);
File: src/Repository/GoalRepository.php
Match lines: 1
107| $goal->setStatus($goal->getStatus());
File: src/Repository/GoalTeamRepository.php
Match lines: 1
53| $goal->getGoal()->setStatus(2);
File: src/Repository/GovernanceAuthorizationRepository.php
Match lines: 1
80| $aut->setStatus($data['status'] ?? 'ativa');
File: src/Repository/PayrollRepository.php
Match lines: 1
277| $payroll->setStatus('em_preparacao'); // Status inicial alinhado com Financeiro (SHEET_STATUS_BUILD)
File: src/Repository/TrainingChapterRepository.php
Match lines: 1
176| $chapter->setStatus($data['status']);
File: src/Repository/TrainingModuleRepository.php
Match lines: 1
79| $trainingModule->setStatus($status);
File: src/Security/LoginFormAuthenticator.php
Match lines: 7
238| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
282| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
304| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
502| $schedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATOR_NOT_ASSIGNED);
525| $contracts->setStatus(0);
634| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(-2);
729| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(-2);
File: src/Service/AccountProfileService.php
Match lines: 1
288| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
File: src/Service/AsaasBillingService.php
Match lines: 8
1570| $subscription->setStatus($this->isAsaasPaymentConfirmed($paymentData) ? 'paid' : $this->resolvePaymentStatus($payload));
1966| $subscription->setStatus('pending');
2048| $subscription->setStatus(strtolower((string) ($response['status'] ?? 'pending')));
2166| $payment->setStatus('cancelled');
2200| $customer->setStatus('active');
2255| $subscription->setStatus($this->resolveSubscriptionStatus($payload));
2313| $payment->setStatus($this->resolveStablePaymentStatus($payment->getStatus(), $this->resolvePaymentStatus($response)));
2379| $payment->setStatus($this->resolveStablePaymentStatus($payment->getStatus(), $this->resolvePaymentStatus($payload)));
File: src/Service/AssessmentStatusService.php
Match lines: 2
46| $assessment->setStatus('fechada');
72| $pesquisa->setStatus('ativa');
File: src/Service/Ata/AtaProcessorService.php
Match lines: 9
209| $ata->setStatus(ProjectAta::STATUS_EXECUTED);
459| $ata->setStatus(ProjectAta::STATUS_CANCELLED);
941| $task->setStatus((int) $tarefa['status_code']);
950| $task->setStatus($status);
1662| $goal->setStatus(Goal::STATUS_OPEN);
1764| $gda->setStatus(GoalDevelopmentAction::STATUS_OPEN);
2424| $invitation->setStatus(\App\Entity\UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
4413| $offboardingMember->setStatus($status);
4590| $offboardingMember->setStatus($status);
File: src/Service/Ata/Submit/AtaFinishGoalSubmitService.php
Match lines: 2
69| $goal->setStatus(Goal::STATUS_FINISHED);
83| $gdaItem->setStatus(GoalDevelopmentAction::STATUS_FINISHED);
File: src/Service/AutomationByResultsService.php
Match lines: 2
102| $contract->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_NAO_PASSOU);
194| $contract->setStatus(Contracts::STATUS_CONTRATADO);
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 24
3377| $requestRecord->setStatus(FlowAutomationRequest::STATUS_EXPIRED);
3989| $pm->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
4035| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
4712| $requestRecord->setStatus(FlowAutomationRequest::STATUS_PENDING);
4923| $requestRecord->setStatus(FlowAutomationRequest::STATUS_PENDING);
4993| $requestRecord->setStatus(FlowAutomationRequest::STATUS_EXPIRED);
5109| $newMember->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
7535| $member->setStatus(\App\Entity\FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_TRANSFERRED);
7567| $newMember->setStatus(\App\Entity\FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
7638| $member->setStatus(\App\Entity\FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
8085| $onboardingMember->setStatus($status);
8263| $offboardingMember->setStatus($status);
8486| $contracts->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_CONTRATADO);
8563| $invitation->setStatus(\App\Entity\UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
8633| $contracts->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_CLASSIFICADO);
8670| $contracts->setStatus(\App\Entity\Contracts::STATUS_NAO_PASSOU);
9027| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
9095| $member->setStatus('classified');
9155| $member->setStatus('approved');
10098| $member->setStatus($newStatus);
11236| $newMember->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
11548| $instance->setStatus(\App\Entity\FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
11562| $newMember->setStatus(\App\Entity\FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
14153| $participant->setStatus('active');
File: src/Service/CalendarEventConverterService.php
Match lines: 1
205| $calendarEvent->setStatus($task->getStatus());
File: src/Service/CalendarEventMapperService.php
Match lines: 2
341| $event->setStatus($activity['status'] ?? null);
419| $event->setStatus($task->getStatus());
File: src/Service/CalendarMemberGenerator.php
Match lines: 1
512| $booking->setStatus(SpaceBooking::STATUS_CONFIRMED);
File: src/Service/ChatNotificationService.php
Match lines: 1
294| $participant->setStatus('active');
File: src/Service/ChatSuggestionService.php
Match lines: 2
1965| $meta->setStatus($iaChanges[$id] ? \App\Entity\Goal::STATUS_FINISHED : \App\Entity\Goal::STATUS_OPEN);
2057| $t->setStatus($iaChanges[$id] ? 4 : 1); // 4=concluida, 1=nao_iniciada
File: src/Service/CicloInicialService.php
Match lines: 4
336| $instance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
374| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
453| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_APPROVED);
455| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_REJECTED);
File: src/Service/Cnab/CnabOrchestratorService.php
Match lines: 1
193| $reg->setStatus($rem->getStatus());
File: src/Service/Cnab/CnabReturnApplyService.php
Match lines: 3
116| $payable->setStatus('paid');
169| $receivable->setStatus('received');
410| $bankReturn->setStatus($isSuccess ? 'approved' : 'draft');
File: src/Service/Contract/ContractProcessorService.php
Match lines: 1
2139| $contract->setStatus((string) ($state['action'] ?? 'preview_contract'));
File: src/Service/Contractor/ContractorProviderCompanyService.php
Match lines: 4
490| ->setStatus('nao_conforme');
563| ->setStatus($this->resolveRequirementDocumentStatus($link));
621| ->setStatus($this->resolveRequirementDocumentStatus($link));
711| ->setStatus($this->resolveRequirementDocumentStatus($link));
File: src/Service/CrmAutomationService.php
Match lines: 9
1064| $contextEntity->setStatus($targetKanbanColumn->getCrmLeadsStatus());
1132| $contextEntity->setStatus($targetKanbanColumn->getCrmLeadsStatus());
1155| $newLead->setStatus($targetKanbanColumn->getCrmLeadsStatus());
1195| $newLead->setStatus($targetKanbanColumn->getCrmLeadsStatus());
1236| $newLead->setStatus($targetKanbanColumn->getCrmLeadsStatus());
1543| $newLead->setStatus($firstLeadColumn->getCrmLeadsStatus());
1602| $newLead->setStatus($firstLeadColumn->getCrmLeadsStatus());
1674| $newLead->setStatus($firstLeadColumn->getCrmLeadsStatus());
1729| $newLead->setStatus($firstLeadColumn->getCrmLeadsStatus());
File: src/Service/Demo/AuraRh/AuraRhOperationalStressSourceWriter.php
Match lines: 6
291| ->setStatus('ACTIVE')
361| $task->setStatus(AuraRhOperationalStressConstants::TASK_STATUS_OPEN);
529| $survey->setStatus(true);
549| $research->setStatus(true);
594| $license->setStatus('ativo');
627| $row->setStatus('aprovado');
File: src/Service/FloorService.php
Match lines: 1
379| $newBooking->setStatus($bookingData['status']);
File: src/Service/GoalService.php
Match lines: 4
59| $goal->setStatus(Goal::STATUS_DELAYED);
62| $goal->setStatus(Goal::STATUS_OPEN);
75| $gda->setStatus(GoalDevelopmentAction::STATUS_DELAYED);
78| $gda->setStatus(GoalDevelopmentAction::STATUS_OPEN);
File: src/Service/Goals/GoalCycleService.php
Match lines: 2
291| $goal->setStatus(Goal::STATUS_FINISHED);
301| $actionItem->setStatus(GoalActionPlanItem::STATUS_DONE);
File: src/Service/Goals/GoalModelService.php
Match lines: 1
321| ->setStatus(isset($row['status']) ? (int) $row['status'] : GoalActionPlanItem::STATUS_OPEN)
File: src/Service/Goals/GoalWriteService.php
Match lines: 2
353| $goal->setStatus(Goal::STATUS_FINISHED);
419| $goal->setStatus(Goal::STATUS_OPEN);
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceBadgeConfigService.php
Match lines: 1
199| ->setStatus($this->calculateBadgeStatus($badge));
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceBadgeCrudService.php
Match lines: 2
47| $badge->setStatus($this->calculateStatus($badge, []));
162| $badge->setStatus($this->calculateStatus($badge, $authorizations));
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceMemberAuthorizationDocumentService.php
Match lines: 1
257| ->setStatus(GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_PENDENTE)
File: src/Service/Governance/Grc/GrcCaseLifecycleService.php
Match lines: 3
704| ->setStatus(GovernanceGrcCaseLifecycleStatus::RESOLVED)
740| ->setStatus(GovernanceGrcCaseLifecycleStatus::CLOSED)
775| $case->setStatus(GovernanceGrcCaseLifecycleStatus::OPEN);
File: src/Service/Governance/Grc/GrcCaseSyncService.php
Match lines: 2
332| $case->setStatus(GovernanceGrcCaseLifecycleStatus::OPEN);
417| $case->setStatus($lifecycleStatus);
File: src/Service/HealthConsultAlertsMonitorService.php
Match lines: 1
54| $consultation->setStatus(SpecialistHealthConsult::STATUS_CANCELADO);
File: src/Service/Interview/InterviewVoiceSessionService.php
Match lines: 1
340| $answer->setStatus(InterviewAnswer::STATUS_ANSWERED);
File: src/Service/InterviewEvaluationAlertService.php
Match lines: 1
59| $schedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATION_PENDING);
File: src/Service/JobStatusService.php
Match lines: 2
12| public function setStatus(string $jobId, string $status, array $extra = []): void
21| $job->setStatus($status, $extra);
File: src/Service/JornadaMetahumanService.php
Match lines: 8
312| $instance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
345| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
622| $fim->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
802| $newMember->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
1009| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
1029| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
1185| $existingFim->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
1199| $fim->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
File: src/Service/KanbanFlowableSyncService.php
Match lines: 3
306| $instance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_COMPLETED);
670| $member->setStatus($newStatus);
883| $member->setStatus('completed');
File: src/Service/LinkAccessService.php
Match lines: 5
152| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
225| $schedule->setStatus(LiveInterviewSchedule::EVALUATOR_NOT_ASSIGNED);
248| $contracts->setStatus(0);
355| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(-2);
446| $liveInterviewSchedule->setStatus(-2);
File: src/Service/Member/Import/MemberImportBatchTracker.php
Match lines: 3
48| $batch->setStatus(MemberImportBatch::STATUS_PENDING);
58| $batchRow->setStatus(MemberImportBatchRow::STATUS_PENDING);
118| $batch->setStatus(MemberImportBatch::STATUS_PROCESSING);
File: src/Service/Member/Import/MemberImportRowProcessor.php
Match lines: 1
138| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
File: src/Service/MetaHuman/FinanceHubPresentationDemoSeeder.php
Match lines: 7
181| $cc->setStatus('1');
217| $supplier->setStatus('1');
256| $customer->setStatus('1');
295| $account->setStatus(true);
345| $budget->setStatus($status);
407| $ap->setStatus($def['status']);
469| $ar->setStatus($def['status']);
File: src/Service/MetaHuman/GovernanceCasesActiveExampleSeeder.php
Match lines: 1
80| $authorization->setStatus('ativa');
File: src/Service/MetaHuman/GovernanceCasesExampleAuthorizationSeeder.php
Match lines: 1
68| $authorization->setStatus('ativa');
File: src/Service/MetaHuman/GovernanceCasesHubService.php
Match lines: 3
930| $record->setStatus(GovernanceCaseRecord::STATUS_RESOLVED);
1144| $record->setStatus(GovernanceCaseRecord::STATUS_REOPENED);
2557| $record->setStatus(GovernanceCaseRecord::STATUS_RESOLVED);
File: src/Service/MetaHuman/GovernanceCasesResolvedExampleSeeder.php
Match lines: 1
90| $record->setStatus(GovernanceCaseRecord::STATUS_RESOLVED);
File: src/Service/MetaHuman/MemberSheetWizardStateService.php
Match lines: 4
190| $row->setStatus(MetaHumanMemberSheetWizardState::STATUS_ACTIVE);
212| $row->setStatus(MetaHumanMemberSheetWizardState::STATUS_ABANDONED);
233| $row->setStatus(MetaHumanMemberSheetWizardState::STATUS_ACTIVE);
280| $row->setStatus(MetaHumanMemberSheetWizardState::STATUS_ACTIVE);
File: src/Service/MetaHuman/RiskIntelligenceCriticalIndicatorsSeeder.php
Match lines: 2
216| $offboardingMember->setStatus($status);
281| $task->setStatus(1);
File: src/Service/MetaHuman/RiskIntelligenceOntologyPresentationSeeder.php
Match lines: 7
354| ->setStatus('ACTIVE')
428| $lm->setStatus('aprovado');
701| $occurrence->setStatus('aberto');
1095| $license->setStatus('ativo');
1120| $survey->setStatus(true);
1142| $research->setStatus(true);
1270| $licenseMember->setStatus('aprovado');
File: src/Service/NpsTemplateEquivalenceService.php
Match lines: 2
34| $clone->setStatus(NpsTemplate::STATUS_ACTIVE);
69| $nm->setStatus($m->getStatus() ?? NpsMedia::STATUS_ACTIVE);
File: src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php
Match lines: 1
45| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Service/OffboardingToRecruitmentService.php
Match lines: 2
373| $process->setStatus(Process::STATUS_AWAITING_VALIDATION);
893| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_INACTIVE); // Deploy com activate=false, ativar manualmente
File: src/Service/OffboardingWorkflowService.php
Match lines: 1
66| $process->setStatus(Process::STATUS_ACTIVE);
File: src/Service/Ontology/AgentIdentityResolutionPendingService.php
Match lines: 1
47| ->setStatus(AgentIdentityResolutionPending::STATUS_PENDING)
File: src/Service/Ontology/Alert/OntologyAlertReviewDecisionService.php
Match lines: 1
66| ->setStatus(OntologyAlertReviewStatus::REVIEWED)
File: src/Service/Ontology/Alert/OntologyAlertReviewPersistenceService.php
Match lines: 1
252| ->setStatus(OntologyAlertReview::STATUS_PENDING_REVIEW)
File: src/Service/Ontology/RiskIndicator/RiskIndicatorCriticalAlertsEvaluationService.php
Match lines: 1
1415| ->setStatus('ACTIVE')
File: src/Service/PPS/CycleStatusService.php
Match lines: 9
34| $cycle->setStatus(CompensationCycle::STATUS_APPROVED);
47| $cycle->setStatus(CompensationCycle::STATUS_INVALIDATED);
84| $currentInEffect->setStatus(CompensationCycle::STATUS_SUPERSEDED);
91| $cycle->setStatus(CompensationCycle::STATUS_IN_EFFECT);
448| $clone->setStatus(CompensationCycle::STATUS_DRAFT);
495| $newOvr->setStatus(WorksheetOverride::STATUS_DRAFT);
516| $cloneOrganogram->setStatus('draft');
561| $newTemplate->setStatus($sourceTemplate->getStatus() ?? 'active');
581| $newRole->setStatus($sourceRole->getStatus() ?? 'active');
File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/Import/ChartDataImportService.php
Match lines: 1
796| $import->setStatus($status);
File: src/Service/ProcessDeadlineService.php
Match lines: 2
47| $process->setStatus('Close');
83| $process->setStatus('Close');
File: src/Service/ProcessNewService.php
Match lines: 3
218| $processos->setStatus(Process::STATUS_INACTIVE);
1668| $invitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
2101| $clonedProcess->setStatus(Process::STATUS_INACTIVE);
File: src/Service/ProcessStatusService.php
Match lines: 1
222| $process->setStatus(Process::STATUS_CLOSE);
File: src/Service/Products/AbstractGroupCycleStageBpmnService.php
Match lines: 1
280| $instance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
File: src/Service/Products/Assessment360BpmnService.php
Match lines: 5
821| $groupMember->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
857| $participantMember->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
1115| $assessment->setStatus('inativa');
1553| $assessment->setStatus('ativa');
1602| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
File: src/Service/Products/CrmBpmnService.php
Match lines: 9
366| $instance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
382| $member->setStatus('in_progress');
622| $board->setStatus($crmStatus);
877| $member->setStatus('in_progress');
1640| $member->setStatus('in_progress');
1761| $member->setStatus('in_progress');
1973| $member->setStatus('in_progress');
2094| $member->setStatus('in_progress');
2577| $member->setStatus('in_progress');
File: src/Service/Products/FinancialFlowBpmnService.php
Match lines: 8
688| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
1818| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_REJECTED);
1820| $member->setStatus('completed');
1822| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
2363| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
2823| $payable->setStatus('draft');
2902| $receivable->setStatus('draft');
2972| $bankReturn->setStatus('draft');
File: src/Service/Products/FinancialFlowCnabIntegrationService.php
Match lines: 5
179| $remittance->setStatus('cancelled');
302| $bankReturn->setStatus('draft');
318| $bankReturn->setStatus('approved');
343| $bankReturn->setStatus('approved');
699| $registry->setStatus($status);
File: src/Service/Products/FinancialFlowDomainActionService.php
Match lines: 7
279| $entity->setStatus('open');
318| $entity->setStatus('rejected');
380| $entity->setStatus('paid');
489| $entity->setStatus('open');
524| $entity->setStatus('rejected');
550| $entity->setStatus('received');
580| $entity->setStatus('approved');
File: src/Service/Products/FinancialFlowHumanFallbackService.php
Match lines: 1
146| $request->setStatus(FlowAutomationRequest::STATUS_PENDING);
File: src/Service/Products/NpsBpmnService.php
Match lines: 1
523| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
File: src/Service/Products/PayrollClosingBpmnService.php
Match lines: 4
793| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
911| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
1564| $flowInstance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
1651| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
File: src/Service/Products/PdiBpmnService.php
Match lines: 3
175| $goal->setStatus(Goal::STATUS_OPEN);
214| $flowMember->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
511| $instance->setStatus(FlowInstance::STATUS_ACTIVE);
File: src/Service/Products/PesquisaEstruturalBpmnService.php
Match lines: 8
521| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
617| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
700| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
786| $survey->setStatus(true);
839| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
955| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
1160| $survey->setStatus(false);
1306| $participant->setStatus('pending');
File: src/Service/Products/RefundLinkedPayableSyncService.php
Match lines: 3
56| $payable->setStatus($normalizedTarget);
218| $payable->setStatus('awaiting_approval');
384| $supplier->setStatus('1');
File: src/Service/Products/TreinamentosBpmnService.php
Match lines: 7
452| $groupMember->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
527| $participantMember->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
792| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
872| $m->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
967| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
1161| $participantMember->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
1375| $groupMember->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
File: src/Service/ProjectAutomationService.php
Match lines: 2
1385| $task->setStatus($statusId);
1536| $subtask->setStatus(1); // Define o status como completo
File: src/Service/PulseSurveyService.php
Match lines: 2
102| $survey->setStatus(false); // Desativar pesquisa
113| $survey->setStatus(false);
File: src/Service/QuestionnaireAssessment360Service.php
Match lines: 2
232| $questionnaire->setStatus('Não Publicado');
252| $questionnaire->setStatus('Publicado');
File: src/Service/QuestionnaireProcessorService.php
Match lines: 33
704| ->setStatus(\App\Entity\UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION)
1684| $invite->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_USER_ACTIVATED);
1983| $task->setStatus(1);
2467| $subtask->setStatus($status);
2628| $training->setStatus($statusValue);
3046| $module->setStatus('active');
3543| $process->setStatus('Ativo');
5364| $lead->setStatus($defaultStatus);
5767| $product->setStatus($status);
6055| $intermediateCrm->setStatus('CRM Clássico'); // Status padrão
6419| $service->setStatus($status);
6637| $userInvitation->setStatus(UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
6883| $lead->setStatus($defaultStatus);
7388| $produto->setStatus($produtoData['status']);
7495| $servico->setStatus($servicoData['status']);
7596| $trainingModule->setStatus($status);
7664| $chapter->setStatus('active');
7981| $invitation->setStatus(\App\Entity\UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
8362| $invitation->setStatus(\App\Entity\UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION);
9072| $developmentAction->setStatus(GoalDevelopmentAction::STATUS_OPEN);
9557| $newsletter->setStatus(CulturalHubNewsletter::STATUS_CREATED);
9624| $post->setStatus(CulturalHubBlogPost::STATUS_PUBLISHED);
9628| $post->setStatus(CulturalHubBlogPost::STATUS_IN_ANALYSIS);
10343| $incident->setStatus(MaintenanceIncident::STATUS_OPEN);
11763| $member->setStatus($status);
11856| $member->setStatus($this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingMemberStatus::class)->find(2));
11877| $member->setStatus($this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingMemberStatus::class)->find(5));
12318| $licenseMember->setStatus('Aprovado');
12320| $licenseMember->setStatus('Em Análise');
12322| $licenseMember->setStatus('Em Edição');
12362| $licenseMember->setStatus($status);
12417| $license->setStatus($status);
12482| $licenseCollective->setStatus($status);
File: src/Service/Recruitment/QualifiedProfessionalsService.php
Match lines: 1
490| ->setStatus(TrmPerson::STATUS_ACTIVE);
File: src/Service/SessionManagerService.php
Match lines: 2
65| $session->setStatus(CandidateSession::STATUS_ACTIVE);
260| $interview->setStatus(Interview::STATUS_PENDING);
File: src/Service/SpaceBookingCalendarSyncService.php
Match lines: 1
297| $booking->setStatus(SpaceBooking::STATUS_CONFIRMED);
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaApproachSubmitService.php
Match lines: 2
69| $abordagem->setStatus(SsmaAbordagem::STATUS_FINALIZADA);
213| $task->setStatus(1);
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaEventService.php
Match lines: 2
57| $event->setStatus($this->resolveInitialStatus($event));
232| $event->setStatus($data['status']);
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaInspectionSubmitService.php
Match lines: 1
339| $task->setStatus(1);
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaMetaAbonoService.php
Match lines: 4
541| ->setStatus($status);
621| $req->setStatus(SsmaMetaAbonoRequest::STATUS_PENDING);
643| $req->setStatus($status)
665| $req->setStatus(SsmaMetaAbonoRequest::STATUS_CANCELLED);
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaOccurrenceApprovalService.php
Match lines: 1
103| $event->setStatus(SsmaEvent::STATUS_ABERTO);
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaOccurrenceAutoFinalizeService.php
Match lines: 2
53| $event->setStatus(SsmaEvent::STATUS_CONCLUIDO);
78| $occurrence->setStatus('finalizada');
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaOccurrenceSubmitService.php
Match lines: 1
69| $occurrence->setStatus('nova');
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaRefusalRightService.php
Match lines: 3
280| $entity->setStatus(
293| $entity->setStatus(
335| $entity->setStatus(
File: src/Service/SstExamService.php
Match lines: 1
94| $result->setStatus($resultData['status'] ?? SstExamResult::STATUS_APTO);
File: src/Service/TimeManagement/OccurrenceDetectionService.php
Match lines: 2
1682| $hitSpotTime->setStatus('ausente'); // Único campo preenchido
1844| $occurrence->setStatus(Occurrence::STATUS_JUSTIFIED);
File: src/Service/TimeManagement/TimeManagementService.php
Match lines: 5
1374| $link->setStatus(true);
3373| $hitSpotTime->setStatus('registrado');
4031| $occurrence->setStatus(Occurrence::STATUS_JUSTIFIED);
4076| $occurrence->setStatus(Occurrence::STATUS_RESOLVED);
4786| $hitSpotTime->setStatus('editado');
File: src/Service/TimeManagement/WorkScheduleService.php
Match lines: 1
246| $schedule->setStatus($status);
File: src/Service/TrainingAutomationService.php
Match lines: 1
1483| $process->setStatus('Ativo'); // Reativar se estiver inativo
File: src/Service/Trm/EventIngestion/EventIngestor.php
Match lines: 1
163| $interaction->setStatus($this->inferInteractionStatus($event));
File: src/Service/Trm/EventIngestion/PersonResolver.php
Match lines: 1
153| $person->setStatus(TrmPerson::STATUS_ACTIVE);
File: src/Service/Trm/TrmEventTriggerService.php
Match lines: 4
122| $task->setStatus(TrmTask::STATUS_PENDING);
181| $interaction->setStatus(TrmInteraction::STATUS_REPLIED);
216| $task->setStatus(TrmTask::STATUS_PENDING);
305| $task->setStatus(TrmTask::STATUS_PENDING);
File: src/Service/Trm/TrmWorkflowService.php
Match lines: 4
266| $person->setStatus('ACTIVE');
325| $task->setStatus(TrmTask::STATUS_PENDING);
468| $task->setStatus(TrmTask::STATUS_PENDING);
699| $task->setStatus(TrmTask::STATUS_CANCELLED);
File: src/Service/UserProcessFlowSyncService.php
Match lines: 1
275| $member->setStatus(FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
File: src/Service/WorkflowCandidateService.php
Match lines: 1
536| $member->setStatus(\App\Entity\FlowInstanceMember::STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
File: src/Service/WorkflowOnboardingService.php
Match lines: 2
200| $member->setStatus('active');
271| $member->setStatus('stopped');
File: src/Service/ai_committee/BrainstormDeliberationEnqueueService.php
Match lines: 1
89| $session->setStatus('processing');
File: src/Service/ai_committee/ModelV3/Handoff/CommitteeV3HandoffContinuationService.php
Match lines: 1
292| $session->setStatus($autoDispatch ? 'processing' : 'pending_handoff');
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php"}
Result
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php (Total lines: 296)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-296
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Repository;
4|
5|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
6|use Doctrine\Bundle\DoctrineBundle\Repository\ServiceEntityRepository;
7|use Doctrine\ORM\OptimisticLockException;
8|use Doctrine\ORM\ORMException;
9|use Doctrine\Persistence\ManagerRegistry;
10|
11|/**
12| * @extends ServiceEntityRepository<EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento>
13| *
14| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento|null find($id, $lockMode = null, $lockVersion = null)
15| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento|null findOneBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null)
16| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[] findAll()
17| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[] findBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null, $limit = null, $offset = null)
18| */
19|class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository extends ServiceEntityRepository
20|{
21| public function __construct(ManagerRegistry $registry)
22| {
23| parent::__construct($registry, EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class);
24| }
25|
26| /**
27| * @throws ORMException
28| * @throws OptimisticLockException
29| */
30| public function add(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $entity, bool $flush = true): void
31| {
32| $this->_em->persist($entity);
33| if ($flush) {
34| $this->_em->flush();
35| }
36| }
37|
38| /**
39| * @throws ORMException
40| * @throws OptimisticLockException
41| */
42| public function remove(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $entity, bool $flush = true): void
43| {
44| $this->_em->remove($entity);
45| if ($flush) {
46| $this->_em->flush();
47| }
48| }
49|
50| function sanitizeCNPJ($cnpj) {
51| return preg_replace('/\D/', '', $cnpj);
52| }
53|
54| function sanitizeCPF($cpf) {
55| return preg_replace('/\D/', '', $cpf);
56| }
57|
58| private function buildDateOrNull(?string $date): ?\DateTime
59| {
60| return !empty($date) ? new \DateTime($date) : null;
61| }
62|
63| public function saveEventS2299($esocialDadosTrabalhador, $data, $company, $dadosRemuneracao): EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
64| {
65| $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
66| $event->setModo( 'INC');
67| $event->setCompany($company);
68| $event->setTpAmb($company->getEsocialMode() ?? '2');
69| $event->setTpInscTransmissor(1);
70| $event->setNrInscTransmissor($this->sanitizeCNPJ($company->getCnpj()));
71| $event->setEsocialTrabalhador($esocialDadosTrabalhador);
72| $event->setIndRetif(1);
73| $event->setStatus('pendente');
74| $event->setCreatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
75| $event->setMtvDeslig($data['motivoDesligamento'] ?? null);
76| $event->setDtDeslig($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataDesligamento']) ?? null);
77| $event->setDtAvPrv($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataConcessaoAviso']) ?? null);
78| $event->setIndPagtoApi(isset($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado']) && $data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] !== '' ? ($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N') : null);
79| $event->setDtProjFimApi($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataTerminoAviso']) ?? null);
80| $event->setPensAlim($data['pensAlim'] ?? null);
81| $event->setPercAliment($data['percAliment'] ?? null);
82| $event->setVrAlim($data['vrAlim'] ?? null);
83| $event->setNrProcTrab($data['numeroProcesso'] ?? null);
84| $event->setIndPdv($data['indPdv'] ?? null);
85| $event->setCpfSubstituto($this->sanitizeCPF($data['cpfSubstituto']) ?? null);
86| $event->setDtNascto($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataNascimentoTitular']) ?? null);
87| $event->setNovoCpf($this->sanitizeCPF($data['novoCpfTrabalhador']) ?? null);
88| $event->setIndRemun($data['indRemun'] ?? null);
89| $event->setDtFimRemun($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dtFimRemun']) ?? null);
90| $event->setInsConsig($data['matriculaInstituicao'] ?? null);
91| $event->setNrContr($data['numeroContrato'] ?? null);
92| $event->setDadosRemuneracao($dadosRemuneracao);
93|
94| $this->add($event);
95|
96| return $event;
97| }
98|
99| /**
100| * Extrai todos os dados do evento S-2299 para formatação no FlowableVariablesService
101| *
102| * @param int $eventId ID do evento (EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento)
103| * @return array|null Dados estruturados do evento e relacionamentos, ou null se não encontrado
104| */
105| public function getFlowableDataForTemplate(int $eventId): ?array
106| {
107| $event = $this->find($eventId);
108|
109| if (!$event) {
110| return null;
111| }
112|
113| // Extrair dados principais do evento
114| $data = [
115| 'id' => $event->getId(),
116| 'mtvDeslig' => $event->getMtvDeslig(),
117| 'dtDeslig' => $event->getDtDeslig()?->format('Y-m-d'),
118| 'dtAvPrv' => $event->getDtAvPrv()?->format('Y-m-d'),
119| 'indPagtoApi' => $event->getIndPagtoApi(),
120| 'dtProjFimApi' => $event->getDtProjFimApi()?->format('Y-m-d'),
121| 'pensAlim' => $event->getPensAlim(),
122| 'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),
123| 'vrAlim' => $event->getVrAlim(),
124| 'nrProcTrab' => $event->getNrProcTrab(),
125| 'indPdv' => $event->getIndPdv(),
126| 'cpfSubstituto' => $event->getCpfSubstituto(),
127| 'dtNascto' => $event->getDtNascto()?->format('Y-m-d'),
128| 'novoCpf' => $event->getNovoCpf(),
129| 'indRemun' => $event->getIndRemun(),
130| 'dtFimRemun' => $event->getDtFimRemun()?->format('Y-m-d'),
131| 'insConsig' => $event->getInsConsig(),
132| 'nrContr' => $event->getNrContr(),
133| ];
134|
135| // Extrair dados da classe pai (EsocialEvents)
136| $data['modo'] = $event->getModo();
137| $data['tpAmb'] = $event->getTpAmb();
138| $data['uniqueEventId'] = $event->getUniqueEventId();
139| $data['tpInscTransmissor'] = $event->getTpInscTransmissor();
140| $data['nrInscTransmissor'] = $event->getNrInscTransmissor();
141| $data['iniValid'] = $event->getIniValid();
142| $data['fimValid'] = $event->getFimValid();
143| $data['indRetif'] = $event->getIndRetif();
144| $data['indApuracao'] = $event->getIndApuracao();
145| $data['perApur'] = $event->getPerApur()?->format('Y-m-d');
146| $data['indGuia'] = $event->getIndGuia();
147| $data['status'] = $event->getStatus();
148| $data['createdAt'] = $event->getCreatedAt()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s');
149| $data['updatedAt'] = $event->getUpdatedAt()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s');
150|
151| // Extrair dados da empresa
152| $company = $event->getCompany();
153| if ($company) {
154| $data['company'] = [
155| 'id' => $company->getId(),
156| 'name' => $company->getName(),
157| 'code' => $company->getCode(),
158| 'cnpj' => $company->getCnpj(),
159| ];
160| } else {
161| $data['company'] = null;
162| }
163|
164| // Extrair dados do trabalhador eSocial relacionado
165| $esocialTrabalhador = $event->getEsocialTrabalhador();
166| if ($esocialTrabalhador) {
167| $dadosTrabalhador = $esocialTrabalhador->getDadosTrabalhador();
168| $endereco = $esocialTrabalhador->getEndereco();
169|
170| $data['esocialTrabalhador'] = [
171| 'id' => $esocialTrabalhador->getId(),
172| 'isTrabalhadorSemVinculo' => $esocialTrabalhador->getIsTrabalhadorSemVinculo(),
173| 'dadosTrabalhador' => $dadosTrabalhador ? [
174| 'cpfTrab' => $dadosTrabalhador->getCpfTrab(),
175| 'nmTrab' => $dadosTrabalhador->getNmTrab(),
176| 'sexo' => $dadosTrabalhador->getSexo(),
177| 'racaCor' => $dadosTrabalhador->getRacaCor(),
178| 'estCiv' => $dadosTrabalhador->getEstCiv(),
179| 'grauInstr' => $dadosTrabalhador->getGrauInstr(),
180| 'nmSoc' => $dadosTrabalhador->getNmSoc(),
181| 'dtNascto' => $dadosTrabalhador->getDtNascto()?->format('Y-m-d'),
182| 'paisNascto' => $dadosTrabalhador->getPaisNascto(),
183| 'paisNac' => $dadosTrabalhador->getPaisNac(),
184| 'fonePrinc' => $dadosTrabalhador->getFonePrinc(),
185| 'emailPrinc' => $dadosTrabalhador->getEmailPrinc(),
186| 'dtAltDadosPessoais' => $dadosTrabalhador->getDtAltDadosPessoais()?->format('Y-m-d'),
187| ] : null,
188| 'endereco' => $endereco ? [
189| 'brasil' => $endereco->getBrasil() ? [
190| 'tpLograd' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getTpLograd(),
191| 'dscLograd' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getDscLograd(),
192| 'nrLograd' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getNrLograd(),
193| 'complemento' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getComplemento(),
194| 'bairro' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getBairro(),
195| 'cep' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getCep(),
196| 'codMunic' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getCodMunic(),
197| 'uf' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getUf(),
198| ] : null,
199| 'exterior' => $endereco->getExterior() ? [
200| 'paisResid' => $endereco->getExterior()->getPaisResid(),
201| 'dscLograd' => $endereco->getExterior()->getDscLograd(),
202| 'nrLograd' => $endereco->getExterior()->getNrLograd(),
203| 'complemento' => $endereco->getExterior()->getComplemento(),
204| 'bairro' => $endereco->getExterior()->getBairro(),
205| 'nmCid' => $endereco->getExterior()->getNmCid(),
206| 'codPostal' => $endereco->getExterior()->getCodPostal(),
207| ] : null,
208| ] : null,
209| ];
210| } else {
211| $data['esocialTrabalhador'] = null;
212| }
213|
214| // Extrair dados de remuneração (EsocialDadosRemuneracao)
215| $dadosRemuneracao = $event->getDadosRemuneracao();
216| if ($dadosRemuneracao) {
217| $data['dadosRemuneracao'] = [
218| 'id' => $dadosRemuneracao->getId(),
219| 'indMv' => $dadosRemuneracao->getIndMv(),
220| 'tpInscRemunOutrEmpr' => $dadosRemuneracao->getTpInscRemunOutrEmpr(),
221| 'nmTrab' => $dadosRemuneracao->getNmTrab(),
222| 'dtNascto' => $dadosRemuneracao->getDtNascto()?->format('Y-m-d'),
223| 'tpInscSucessaoVinc' => $dadosRemuneracao->getTpInscSucessaoVinc(),
224| 'nrInscSucessaoVinc' => $dadosRemuneracao->getNrInscSucessaoVinc(),
225| 'matricAnt' => $dadosRemuneracao->getMatricAnt(),
226| 'dtAdm' => $dadosRemuneracao->getDtAdm()?->format('Y-m-d'),
227| 'procJudTrab' => $dadosRemuneracao->getProcJudTrab(),
228| 'infoTerm' => $dadosRemuneracao->getInfoTerm(),
229| ];
230| } else {
231| $data['dadosRemuneracao'] = null;
232| }
233|
234| // Extrair dados do batch se existir
235| $batch = $event->getBatch();
236| if ($batch) {
237| $data['batch'] = [
238| 'id' => $batch->getId(),
239| 'cdResposta' => $batch->getCdResposta(),
240| 'descResposta' => $batch->getDescResposta(),
241| 'protocoloEnvio' => $batch->getProtocoloEnvio(),
242| 'dhRecepcao' => $batch->getDhRecepcao()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s'),
243| ];
244| } else {
245| $data['batch'] = null;
246| }
247|
248| // Extrair dados da resposta se existir
249| $response = $event->getResponse();
250| if ($response) {
251| $data['response'] = [
252| 'id' => $response->getId(),
253| 'tpAmb' => $response->getTpAmb(),
254| 'cdResposta' => $response->getCdResposta(),
255| 'descResposta' => $response->getDescResposta(),
256| 'nrRecibo' => $response->getNrRecibo(),
257| 'dhProcessamento' => $response->getDhProcessamento()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s'),
258| 'ocorrencias' => $response->getOcorrencias(),
259| ];
260| } else {
261| $data['response'] = null;
262| }
263|
264| return $data;
265| }
266|
267| // /**
268| // * @return EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[] Returns an array of EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento objects
269| // */
270| /*
271| public function findByExampleField($value)
272| {
273| return $this->createQueryBuilder('e')
274| ->andWhere('e.exampleField = :val')
275| ->setParameter('val', $value)
276| ->orderBy('e.id', 'ASC')
277| ->setMaxResults(10)
278| ->getQuery()
279| ->getResult()
280| ;
281| }
282| */
283|
284| /*
285| public function findOneBySomeField($value): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
286| {
287| return $this->createQueryBuilder('e')
288| ->andWhere('e.exampleField = :val')
289| ->setParameter('val', $value)
290| ->getQuery()
291| ->getOneOrNullResult()
292| ;
293| }
294| */
295|}
296|
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 7094, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 6936}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15387)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 6936-7094
6936| private function executeNotify(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
6937| {
6938| $recipients = $config['recipients'] ?? [];
6939| $recipientType = $config['to'] ?? $config['recipient'] ?? null;
6940| $title = $config['title'] ?? $config['subject'] ?? null;
6941| $message = $config['message'] ?? $config['body'] ?? null;
6942| $messageHtml = $config['message_html'] ?? null;
6943| $type = $config['type'] ?? 'info';
6944| $templateSlug = $config['template'] ?? null;
6945|
6946| // Se recipients está vazio mas há 'to' ou 'recipient', usar como recipient único
6947| if (empty($recipients) && $recipientType) {
6948| $recipients = [$recipientType];
6949| }
6950|
6951| // Fallback: se não há destinatários definidos, enviar para responsável do fluxo
6952| if (empty($recipients)) {
6953| error_log("[NOTIFY] ⚠️ Nenhum destinatário definido (to/recipient/recipients vazios) - usando fallback 'flow_responsible'");
6954| $recipientType = 'flow_responsible';
6955| $recipients = ['flow_responsible'];
6956| }
6957|
6958| // 🎯 GERAR MENSAGEM AUTOMÁTICA se não foi fornecida
6959| if (empty($title) || empty($message)) {
6960| $autoMessage = $this->generateAutoNotificationMessage($member, $recipientType, $context);
6961| $title = $title ?: $autoMessage['title'];
6962| $message = $message ?: $autoMessage['message'];
6963| }
6964|
6965| $title = $this->replaceVariables($title, $member, $context);
6966| $message = $this->replaceVariables($message, $member, $context);
6967| if ($messageHtml !== null && $messageHtml !== '') {
6968| $messageHtml = $this->replaceVariables($messageHtml, $member, $context);
6969| } else {
6970| $messageHtml = null;
6971| }
6972|
6973| $emailTemplateBody = ($messageHtml !== null && $messageHtml !== '') ? $messageHtml : $message;
6974|
6975| $createdNotifications = [];
6976| $emailsSent = [];
6977| $chatMessagesSent = [];
6978|
6979| foreach ($recipients as $recipientType) {
6980| // Merge context with action config so recipient resolvers can reuse action-specific keys.
6981| // Example: manager_permission_products, role_id, company_member_id.
6982| // title/subject must be the already-replaced strings: CompanySenderGenerator renders
6983| // the DB template subject as Twig (e.g. "{{ title }} – {{ companyName }}"). If we keep
6984| // config['title'] here, placeholders like {{member_name}} inside the automation title stay literal.
6985| $recipientContext = array_merge($context, $config, [
6986| 'message' => $emailTemplateBody,
6987| 'body' => $emailTemplateBody,
6988| 'title' => $title,
6989| 'subject' => $title,
6990| ]);
6991| $users = $this->resolveRecipients($recipientType, $member, $recipientContext);
6992|
6993| foreach ($users as $user) {
6994| // 1️⃣ NOTIFICAÇÃO IN-APP (badge/popup)
6995| try {
6996| $notification = new \App\Entity\NotificationSpecialist();
6997| $notification->setUser($user);
6998| $notification->setTitle($title);
6999| $notification->setMessage($message);
7000| $notification->setIsRead(false);
7001| $notification->setCreatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
7002|
7003| $this->entityManager->persist($notification);
7004| $createdNotifications[] = $user->getId();
7005|
7006| if ($this->notificationsCenterService instanceof NotificationsCenterService) {
7007| $notificationType = \App\Entity\NotificationsCenter::TYPE_REQUEST;
7008| if (str_contains((string) $templateSlug, 'bpm-notification') || $type === 'info') {
7009| $notificationType = \App\Entity\NotificationsCenter::TYPE_SYSTEM;
7010| }
7011| $this->notificationsCenterService->createNotification(
7012| recipient: $user,
7013| hub: 'Hub de Operações',
7014| product: 'Workflow BPM',
7015| content: trim($title . ': ' . $message),
7016| type: $notificationType,
7017| sender: null,
7018| buttonUrl: '/chat?adriana=1',
7019| flush: false
7020| );
7021| }
7022|
7023| $this->log('info', '✅ Notificação in-app criada', [
7024| 'userId' => $user->getId(),
7025| 'title' => $title
7026| ]);
7027| } catch (\Exception $e) {
7028| $this->log('error', 'Erro ao criar notificação in-app', ['error' => $e->getMessage()]);
7029| }
7030|
7031| // 2️⃣ EMAIL (se houver template ou corpo)
7032| // NOTA: executeSendEmail() JÁ envia mensagem no chat automaticamente
7033| // conforme documentação (Email + Chat em um único canal)
7034| if ($templateSlug || !empty($emailTemplateBody)) {
7035| try {
7036| $emailConfig = [
7037| 'to' => $user->getEmail(),
7038| 'subject' => $title,
7039| 'body' => $emailTemplateBody,
7040| 'template' => $templateSlug,
7041| '_resolved_recipient_type' => $recipientType,
7042| // Keep request decision links when routing through executeSendEmail;
7043| // chat action buttons depend on these URLs.
7044| 'approve_url' => $config['approve_url'] ?? null,
7045| 'reject_url' => $config['reject_url'] ?? null,
7046| 'approve_button_text' => $config['approve_button_text'] ?? null,
7047| 'reject_button_text' => $config['reject_button_text'] ?? null,
7048| 'request_type_label' => $config['request_type_label'] ?? null,
7049| 'record_name' => $config['record_name'] ?? null,
7050| 'system_sender' => $config['system_sender'] ?? null,
7051| ];
7052| if (filter_var($config['skip_auto_email_template'] ?? false, FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN)) {
7053| $emailConfig['skip_auto_email_template'] = true;
7054| }
7055|
7056| $emailResult = $this->executeSendEmail($emailConfig, $member, $recipientContext);
7057|
7058| if ($emailResult['sent'] ?? false) {
7059| $emailsSent[] = $user->getEmail();
7060| // Contabilizar mensagens de chat enviadas automaticamente pelo executeSendEmail
7061| if (isset($emailResult['chatMessagesSent']) && $emailResult['chatMessagesSent'] > 0) {
7062| $chatMessagesSent = array_merge($chatMessagesSent, $emailResult['chatUserIds'] ?? []);
7063| }
7064| $this->log('info', '✅ Email enviado via notificação (chat incluído automaticamente)', [
7065| 'to' => $user->getEmail(),
7066| 'subject' => $title
7067| ]);
7068| }
7069| } catch (\Exception $e) {
7070| $this->log('error', 'Erro ao enviar email via notificação', [
7071| 'error' => $e->getMessage(),
7072| 'to' => $user->getEmail()
7073| ]);
7074| }
7075| }
7076| }
7077| }
7078|
7079| $this->entityManager->flush();
7080|
7081| return [
7082| 'notified' => count($createdNotifications),
7083| 'userIds' => $createdNotifications,
7084| 'emailsSent' => count($emailsSent),
7085| 'emails' => $emailsSent,
7086| 'chatMessagesSent' => count($chatMessagesSent),
7087| 'chatUserIds' => $chatMessagesSent
7088| ];
7089| }
7090|
7091| /**
7092| * Resolve financial-trail move destination by declarative stage key (YAML target_stage_key).
7093| * Isolated from payroll: only used when sourceType is financial_trail_record.
7094| */
Request #4
deepseek-v4-flash
P:95.28K C:4.38K CR:54.53K CW:0
38640ms
Reasoning
Important findings so far:
1. The `system_sender` field is read from `$config` in `executeNotify` and forwarded into `executeSendEmail` emailConfig. `$config` in the new action is set internally (system_sender => true). But `executeNotify` is called by many actions; `system_sender` in config would only matter if set by callers. The concern in issue 5: since `$config` for automation actions comes from the stored JSON config of the automation (user-editable), could a user set `system_sender: true`? This path is via send_email/request_notification actions... Actually, `system_sender` is now honored in executeNotify → executeSendEmail → chat sender behavior. If any user-configured action config can set system_sender to true (e.g., the notification action config JSON from flow editor), a member editing automations could spoof Adriana. This is speculative; but the field wasn't validated/whitelisted. It's a design concern with a possible security impact. Given precision over recall, this is a plausible concern worth mentioning only if we verify config comes from user. The `$config` in the new S2299 draft action is constructed in executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft, not user-editable (only internal). But `executeNotify` is generic and used elsewhere, and any action whose config passes through to executeNotify could set system_sender. The action config JSON is defined when user creates the automation (from the UI, presumably with only allowed keys from the YAML preset). Let's check how config is built by the front: YAML config presets specify which fields are editable. For send_email actions there may be config with arbitrary keys? Hard to be certain. I'll consider reporting as medium since it's a plausible new capability that lets any automation (customizable by users) emit chat as Adriana with userId null. But is that a security boundary? The chat message as "Adriana/system" from a user-configured automation... within the same company, an admin who can configure automations could also do other things. But a member without such privilege wouldn't be able to configure automations. It's somewhat self-contained. However, impersonation of system is about trust; a flow automation triggered by any employee entry could send messages as Adriana. That could enable phishing toward the responsible. E.g., a malicious HR automation builder could craft messages as Adriana containing external links. This is a plausible concern but might be by design (actions like send_email always may want that?). Since previously only payroll (internal system) used this channel, exposing it to config is a widening. I'll likely report it as a medium security-ish finding, but need to verify how config gets to executeNotify for send_email action type — is system_sender only read when set? Yes, `?? null`, then filter_var on null => false. So only if user sets it in the action config JSON. If the action config is user-controlled arbitrary JSON, then yes.
Let me check where send_email/notify config is stored and whether there's a whitelist. Let me search config/automations for send_email to see the fields the UI offers.
2. The repository line 78 (setIndPagtoApi) is the last commit's change. Note that `setPensAlim`, `setPercAliment`, `setVrAlim` call with raw $data values. With entity setter types now ?string for percAliment/vrAlim, and pensAlim still ?int. $data comes from where? saveEventS2299 callers. If $data comes from request (form) values, pensAlim might be string from form => setPensAlim(?int) non-strict file? The repository file does NOT declare strict_types (no `declare(strict_types=1)` at the top - first line is `<?php` then namespace). So coercions happen. percAliment as string like '12.50' previously would coerce to int 12 with loss; but no TypeError because no strict_types. Now it stores as string correctly. So change is a genuine fix.
Wait, but what about flowables variables where percAliment getter returns string "12.50"; previously returns "12" as int? Also reads of existing DB records: property type from Doctrine decimal returns string; getPercAliment previously declared `?int` returning string => TypeError if any code path called the getter on a hydrated row with a non-null value. If the S-2299 was only created and used in-memory before flush (with int), then getters might have returned int. After reload from DB, it would break. Actually, maybe this table has real rows in prod where these columns were null only. Anyway.
Conclusion for issue 2: The type change int→string is arguably a correction toward the DBAL decimal type and consistent with the S2399 twin entity? Wait S2399 twin still declares ?int for the same decimal columns. Inconsistent across entities but not our diff scope. Old callers within this diff: repository saveEventS2299 passes raw data. FlowableVariablesService only reads. ESocialDataService reads and writes XML. So no TypeError within the diff. Since diff itself is coherent and the reading paths just carry strings, I'll not report issue 2 as a bug, unless some caller in diff assigns to something typed int... Actually S2399Repository setPercAliment passes $data['percentualPensao'] — different entity (S2399). Not impacted by this change.
However, consider ESocialDataService lines 1078-1079 and 1330-1331: `$std->percaliment = $evento->getPercAliment();` Now returns string. If previously the entity was freshly created with int and not reloaded, it was int. Now it's string. For XML serialization, eSocial schema expects decimal "12.50" probably as string. Probably fine.
Actually there's an important nuance: The entity previously declared getPercAliment(): ?int, but if Doctrine hydrated a decimal string, calling getPercAliment would throw TypeError. Given this S2299 flow exists and worked (people saw data), that suggests the column values may be nullable or the getter wasn't called on hydrated rows, OR Doctrine decimal does not convert to string? Actually Doctrine DBAL converts decimal to string by default. On the PHP side for MySQL... Yes decimal → string.
Given the fix makes the getter/setter match the actual DBAL type, the change seems beneficial. I won't raise it. But the repo note says don't comment on correct code. I'll skip #2, or maybe mention it as low? The review plan suggests high, but the actual code review shows it's aligned with the Doctrine decimal type. However, there could be a subtlety with `pensAlim` (integer) still typed ?int, `indRemun` ?int, `percAliment` decimal => string. So the entity now correctly distinguishes. I'll skip it.
3. Status check: what statuses does S-2299 use? Repositories set 'pendente'. MessageHandler EnviarEvento sets 'erro no processamento' on events during batch send? Let's find where S-2299-specific status transitions happen. There's EsocialEventBatchRepository setting 'enviado'. Response repo sets 'processado' / 'erro no processamento'. So for S-2299, statuses are likely 'pendente', 'enviado', 'processado', 'erro no processamento', maybe 'EXCLUSAO_SOLICITADA'. If status = 'erro no processamento' (event failed), the new draft action treats as existing_not_editable (not pendente). That means the draft automation cannot correct a failed S-2299 event; the manual flow would require some other correction path. Actually an event in 'erro no processamento' might need fixing and resending. The automation would not create a new pending draft (correct, to avoid duplicate), but also wouldn't create a corrected one. This could be a real dead-end but maybe out of scope. Whether to report: The code comment says "oficial" but treats error state as official. If the domain has states like erro where the event may be corrected via indRetif, this blocks. It's speculative without deeper investigation of the S-2299 send/correct flow. Let me check the S-2299 send flow to see statuses used for S2299 specifically and how errors are handled. Let me search for where S2299 events change status beyond the generic repos/handlers.
Given statuses across esocial events use strings: 'pendente','enviado','processado','erro no processamento'. The draft service only checks != pendente → existing_not_editable. If event status is 'erro no processamento' (an event that failed to be accepted), re-sending typically uses indRetif to fix, so creating a new pendente wouldn't be the right approach either... but the offboarding draft is the "pre-fill" stage, so if an event was already transmitted and errored, this is not the draft stage's concern; presumably handled manually. This finding is medium, plausible but uncertain. Might report as low/medium guidance to use an explicit list of "definitive" statuses (enviado/processado) and allow pending & error to be recreated as drafts.
4. findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal match: matches when dtDeslig = :dismissalDate OR dtDeslig IS NULL, filtered by same worker + remuneration + pending status. So a manually created pending draft whose date differs from the offboarding's current date (because date changed) is NOT matched => automation creates a NEW pending event => duplicates S-2299 for same employee. That is a genuine risk. However, findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal only looks for non-pendente status. So a manual pending draft with different date would be missed. Yes—issue #4 is real: after a dismissal date change, a prior pending draft with the old date exists, and the automation creates a second pending event. Duplicity risk (business rule says idempotent). Severity medium/high. The comment in code even says when there's no date match only by worker to avoid duplicating before date is filled; but they do filter by date when date present, contradicting their own goal. Good finding to report.
Wait but careful: order in executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft: if metadata-linked event is null, they call findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal (status != pendente). If none, findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal. If a manual pending draft exists with old date (dismissal changed), findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal returns null due to date filter. Then createDraftEvent creates a second pending event. Yes → duplicate pending event. This is the medium #4 finding. It is clearly in the code. Report as bug/medium-high.
But hmm: is creating a second pending event actually harmful? They'd prefer updating the existing one. Idempotency claim: "A automação é idempotente: não deve duplicar evento pendente já existente para o mesmo contexto." Here same worker + remuneration but different date = same context (same dismissal, date just changed). Duplicate. Good.
5. Offboarding metadata use of `$member->getSourceMetadata()` where for a flow member with source_type 'offboarding'. Fine.
Now let me look at the executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft code again, considering whether a new event is persisted but the member metadata (sourceMetadata) includes the eventId only after second flush. OK.
Also check: In the notification, `executeNotify` creates NotificationSpecialist + sends email+chat. But if mailerEnabled false and user not found, only notification persists. In the "missing data" test they assert 1 NotificationSpecialist persisted. Fine.
Now examine `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` message placeholders: `notificationMessage = '... {{member_name}} ...'`. executeNotify replaces variables via `replaceVariables($message, $member, $context)`. The context merge includes 'member_id'. Does replaceVariables resolve {{member_name}} from $member? Probably yes (buildEmailTemplateValues). OK.
Now consider the double-flush subtle issue: They do first flush after persist($member) metadata; then inside `if ($event instanceof ...)` they persist metadata again with eventId and flush again. But if event had not been persisted yet in the DB (created now with status 'created'), then after first flush, the event was persisted? Wait: the event `$event = $draftService->createDraftEvent(...)` then set payload, then `$this->entityManager->persist($event);` before first flush. So on first flush the event row is inserted and gets an id (Doctrine assigns id after flush for identity). Then second flush updates member metadata with event->getId(). OK.
Now, cross-company leak: `$this->findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember($member)` presumably returns OffboardingMember by parsing source metadata / source_id and offboardingMemberId from activitiesProgress. If OffboardingMember belongs to another company, then uses it. But source is from member's flow instance; unlikely.
Let me look at `findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember` to be sure it exists and its logic. Search for that method.
6. Migration issue (companies becoming eligible later not seeded) — need to verify whether there's another mechanism creating default templates on product activation. Hard to prove. The seed only runs once for existing eligible companies. New companies signing after this deploy get no template. Whether there's a startup/product-activation seed for such templates, need to look for flow_templates presets. Search for how 'preset' template seeds happen elsewhere (there are other seeds like offboarding default flow). Since this is a data seed via migration, likely the same pattern used in prior seeds; if all products seed via migration, then new companies simply wouldn't have it (but maybe new companies have empty workflows anyway; the 'Fluxos de Saída' workflow might be created per company from somewhere). Medium uncertainty. This could be by design of existing architecture: product onboarding seeds existing companies once via migration; new companies are created with default flows by product services? Actually the migration mirrors workflow slug 'fluxo-de-saida' existing per company. Wait — workflow rows exist per company. Migration iterates all existing eligible companies' workflows. New companies would have their own workflow created at sign-up, possibly through a bootstrap that includes templates per product. If the template seeding is implemented by some "clone template" mechanism when workflow created, then fine. Not sure. This is more of a product gap. Without evidence of complementary mechanism, reporting is speculative. But rule says: for migration seeds, confirm existence of documentation file. Let me check docs file existence.
7. down() not removing child records. Report as low? Actually there's a bigger logic issue in down() regarding workflow_products deletion guard using active templates referencing product and workflow: they check flow_template_products of other ACTIVE templates referencing same workflow+product. If another active template references the same product, they won't delete the workflow_product. OK. But they don't delete flow_template (soft-delete is_active=0), stages, activities, automations of the template. They leave orphan rows tied to the template id (still referenced by the flow_templates row that is soft-deactivated). So orphan rows remain referencing an inactive template. If down() then up() is run, up() won't find the seed_migration key (removed) and creates a second template (active). Rows from first template remain but inactive template exists too. This results in duplicate templates displayed? flow_templates both exist; old inactive; new active. Users see only active? Possibly templates list shows is_active. If listing only active, fine, but data duplication. Low.
Wait: even without down()/up() replay: up() runs once. If the up() partially fails mid-way (e.g., ensureOffboardingStages fails after template created), rerun would skip template creation (finds template by seed_migration), and proceed to ensure stages/automations idempotently (selects check each). Since stage insert uses lastInsertId and re-running proceeds — the missing bits inserted. Not fully atomic but re-runnable. OK.
Also migration uses `return;` early if tables missing, which silently marks migration as executed? Actually `up()` returning early without doing anything — Doctrine records migration as executed. That's fine for the guard.
8. The description states docs/database-changes file created; the review set does not include the file but says it exists. Let me check with file_find.
Let me also check that services.yaml wiring setter injection target is AutomationExecutionService — yes.
But: config/services.yaml added the setter call to `App\Service\AutomationExecutionService`? The diff shows it appended to some service list near "FinancialFlowAutomationExecutor" - need to confirm it is within AutomationExecutionService definition. The diff context shows `- [setFinancialFlowAutomationExecutor...]` appended `- [setOffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService...]`. Fine presumably in same service.
Now the YAML changes in offboarding.yaml: new action with allowed/blocked triggers. Is 'employee_enters_stage' a valid trigger key? In tests they reference it. Check config schema by searching other actions in the same YAML to confirm trigger naming. Let me look at the file.
Also one issue: The action has both `config_preset.to: flow_responsible` and has_config false. In the migration template's seeded automation, actionConfig 'to' => 'flow_responsible' plus '_default_automation_id'. But the action's description says notify the responsible; execution path in executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft calls executeNotify with `'to' => 'company_member'` and `'company_member_id' => responsible id` (always internal, ignoring the YAML preset's to flow_responsible). Not a bug.
Wait: a YAML-level question — `blocked_triggers` lists triggers that block usage, but `allowed_triggers` only employee_enters_stage. UI uses allowed vs blocked. Fine.
Let me now check what triggers exist in the yaml config file - 'employee_enters_stage' spelling matches 'employee_enters_stage'? The UI labels may differ but that's config semantics; test verifies.
Let me examine possible mismatch: In the migration, the seeded automation uses triggerType 'on_enter' and actionType 'create_esocial_s2299_draft'. Is 'on_enter' a valid trigger_type value in DB? Let me search flow_automations trigger_type values in code (maybe triggers stored as 'on_enter'). Search for `trigger_type` in migration of other seeds or in code. Also 'on_all_activities_complete' and 'on_offboarding_complete' trigger names used in migration's automations. If the actual trigger strings used by the system are different (e.g., stored in DB as enum?), then seeded data could be wrong. Let me check how automations for flow templates are created elsewhere, e.g., other seeding migrations for flow templates (e.g., decision_system templates). Search migrations for 'flow_automations'.
Let me search:
- 'on_enter' in src and config and migrations
- 'trigger_type' in migrations
- 'create_processo_seletivo' references (existing similar action) - fine.
- find docs file.
- findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember method.
Let me do these.
Tool Calls (3)
file_find
Show Details
Arguments
{"query_name": "2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template"}
Result
docs/database-changes/2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template.md
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["migrations/"], "search_text": "flow_automations"}
Result
File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php
Match lines: 10
141| // -- flow_automations -------------------------------------------------
142| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_automations ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS conditions JSON DEFAULT NULL');
143| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_automations ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS actions JSON DEFAULT NULL');
144| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_automations ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS flow_template_id INT DEFAULT NULL');
145| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_automations ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS fixed_stage_type VARCHAR(50) DEFAULT NULL');
146| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_automations MODIFY COLUMN flow_stage_id INT DEFAULT NULL');
758| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index)
766| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index)
781| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index)
1368| 'UPDATE flow_automations
File: migrations/Version20260519203024.php
Match lines: 4
95| SELECT fa.id FROM flow_automations fa
115| SELECT fa.id FROM flow_automations fa
141| if ($this->tableExists('flow_automations')) {
143| "DELETE FROM flow_automations
File: migrations/Version20260617160000_PayrollPayablesStageCleanup.php
Match lines: 2
33| if ($this->tableExists('flow_automations')) {
35| DELETE fa FROM flow_automations fa
File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
Match lines: 3
38| 'flow_automations',
435| FROM flow_automations
454| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, fixed_stage_type, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember"}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 6
14950| $offboardingMember = $this->findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember($member);
15202| $offboardingMember = $this->findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember($member);
15280| $offboardingMember = $this->findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember($member);
15340| private function findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember(FlowInstanceMember $member): ?\App\Entity\OffboardingMember
15351| error_log("[AUTOMATION] findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember: Encontrado via activities_progress.offboardingMemberId = {$omId}");
15381| error_log("[AUTOMATION] findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember: Encontrado via offboarding+companyMember (fallback), OM ID = {$offboardingMember->getId()}");
Request #5
deepseek-v4-flash
P:100.42K C:260 CR:99.58K CW:0
2572ms
Reasoning
The docs file exists. So issue #8 is resolved — no finding.
The migrations reference existing seeding patterns, so let me look at the previous seed migration Version20260518151423 to compare trigger_type values and structure used in flow_automations seeds. Let's read around lines 740-790.
Also let me read the trigger names 'on_enter', 'on_all_activities_complete', 'on_offboarding_complete' in the migration to compare with those used in existing seed (Version20260518151423).
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 800, "file_path": "migrations/Version20260518151423.php", "start_line": 700}
Result
File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php (Total lines: 1558)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 700-800
700| string $anchorDate
701| ): void {
702| $cycles = count($phaseDays);
703| $stages = [];
704| $orderIndex = 0;
705|
706| for ($phase = 1; $phase <= $cycles; $phase++) {
707| $phaseIdx = $phase - 1;
708| $days = (int) ($phaseDays[$phaseIdx] ?? 30);
709| $startOn = $phaseStartDates[$phaseIdx] ?? $anchorDate;
710| $advanceOn = $phaseAdvanceOnDates[$phaseIdx] ?? $anchorDate;
711|
712| $stages[] = [
713| 'name' => "Fase {$phase} em Andamento",
714| 'desc' => "Produtos iniciam em {$startOn} e avançam após {$days} dias. Fim do bloco: {$advanceOn}.",
715| 'cat' => 'andamento', 'phase' => $phase, 'order' => $orderIndex++,
716| 'adv' => ['auto_advance' => true, 'conditions' => [
717| ['type' => 'time_elapsed', 'days' => $days, 'enabled' => true, 'default' => true],
718| ['type' => 'products_completion', 'percentage' => 100, 'enabled' => false, 'default' => false],
719| ]],
720| ];
721| $stages[] = [
722| 'name' => "Análise Periódica Fase {$phase}",
723| 'desc' => "Análise estruturada da Fase {$phase}.",
724| 'cat' => 'feedback_1on1', 'phase' => $phase, 'order' => $orderIndex++, 'adv' => [],
725| ];
726| }
727| $stages[] = [
728| 'name' => 'Análise Jornada',
729| 'desc' => 'Etapa final da jornada para consolidação dos resultados.',
730| 'cat' => 'analise_jornada', 'phase' => null, 'order' => $orderIndex, 'adv' => [],
731| ];
732|
733| $stageIds = [];
734| foreach ($stages as $s) {
735| $this->connection->executeStatement(
736| 'INSERT INTO flow_stages (flow_template_id, product_id, name, description, order_index, advance_rules, stage_category, phase_number)
737| VALUES (:t, NULL, :name, :desc, :o, :adv, :cat, :phase)',
738| ['t' => $templateId, 'name' => $s['name'], 'desc' => $s['desc'], 'o' => $s['order'],
739| 'adv' => json_encode($s['adv'], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE), 'cat' => $s['cat'], 'phase' => $s['phase']]
740| );
741| $stageIds[$s['cat']][(string) ($s['phase'] ?? 'final')] = (int) $this->connection->lastInsertId();
742| }
743|
744| $products = array_values($workflowProductSlugs);
745| foreach ($stages as $s) {
746| $sid = $stageIds[$s['cat']][(string) ($s['phase'] ?? 'final')] ?? null;
747| if (!$sid) {
748| continue;
749| }
750|
751| if ($s['cat'] === 'andamento') {
752| $phaseIdx = max(0, (int) $s['phase'] - 1);
753| $scheduledDate = $phaseStartDates[$phaseIdx] ?? $anchorDate;
754| $daysInStage = (int) ($phaseDays[$phaseIdx] ?? 30);
755| $prods = $this->resolveProductsForPhase($journeyCode, (int) $s['phase'], $products);
756|
757| $this->connection->executeStatement(
758| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index)
759| VALUES (:sid, NULL, :name, \'on_scheduled_date\', \'start_stage_products\', :acfg, :cond, :acts, 1, 0)',
760| ['sid' => $sid, 'name' => 'Na data de início da fase no calendário — iniciar produtos da etapa',
761| 'acfg' => json_encode(['products' => $prods], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
762| 'cond' => json_encode([$this->buildScheduledCondition($scheduledDate)], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
763| 'acts' => json_encode([['type' => 'start_stage_products', 'config' => ['products' => $prods], 'orderIndex' => 0]], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE)]
764| );
765| $this->connection->executeStatement(
766| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index)
767| VALUES (:sid, NULL, :name, \'on_days_in_stage\', \'move_to_next_stage\', \'[]\', :cond, :acts, 1, 1)',
768| ['sid' => $sid, 'name' => 'Após tempo na etapa — mover para próxima etapa',
769| 'cond' => json_encode([['type' => 'on_days_in_stage', 'config' => ['days' => $daysInStage, 'value' => $daysInStage, 'count_from_first_entry' => true], 'orderIndex' => 0]], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
770| 'acts' => json_encode([['type' => 'move_to_next_stage', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0]], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE)]
771| );
772| }
773|
774| if ($s['cat'] === 'feedback_1on1') {
775| $cfg = ['to' => 'direct_manager', 'recipient_type' => 'direct_manager', 'request_type' => 'cycle_feedback_decision',
776| 'title' => 'Decisão da Jornada Metahuman após a análise periódica',
777| 'message' => 'A unidade {{member_name}} concluiu uma etapa de análise periódica da Jornada Metahuman. Escolha o encaminhamento.',
778| 'approve_button_text' => 'Voltar para a fase atual', 'reject_button_text' => 'Avançar para a próxima fase',
779| 'template' => 'bpm-request_notification'];
780| $this->connection->executeStatement(
781| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index)
782| VALUES (:sid, NULL, :name, \'on_enter\', \'request_notification\', :acfg, :cond, :acts, 1, 0)',
783| ['sid' => $sid, 'name' => 'Solicitar decisão do gestor direto após a análise periódica',
784| 'acfg' => json_encode($cfg, JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
785| 'cond' => json_encode([['type' => 'on_enter', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0]], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
786| 'acts' => json_encode([['type' => 'request_notification', 'config' => $cfg, 'orderIndex' => 0]], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE)]
787| );
788| }
789| }
790| }
791|
792| // -------------------------------------------------------------------------
793| // 9. FLOW INSTANCES (plan seed — 1 per template per company)
794| // -------------------------------------------------------------------------
795|
796| private function seedFlowInstances(): void
797| {
798| // Instances are now seeded inline inside seedJornadaMetahumanTemplates().
799| // This method is kept for backward-compat / standalone call on existing DBs.
800| $codes = ['J1', 'J2', 'J3', 'J4', 'J5', 'J6', 'J7', 'J8', 'J9', 'J10'];
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["config/automations/offboarding.yaml"], "search_text": "employee_enters_stage"}
Result
File: config/automations/offboarding.yaml Match lines: 5 32| - id: "employee_enters_stage" 188| - "employee_enters_stage" 218| - "employee_enters_stage" 257| - "employee_enters_stage" 293| - "employee_enters_stage"
Request #6
deepseek-v4-flash
P:102.81K C:494 CR:100.61K CW:0
4289ms
Reasoning
The prior seed migration used trigger_type 'on_enter', 'on_days_in_stage', 'on_scheduled_date' with conditions type matching. In our new migration, trigger types: 'on_enter' (matches existing), 'on_all_activities_complete' (need to check validity), 'on_offboarding_complete' (need to check). And the conditions type for the automation in final stage 'on_enter', 'on_offboarding_complete'. Let me search where trigger_type values are normalized/matched to execution (e.g., in code, trigger_type strings compared). Search 'on_offboarding_complete' and 'all_activities_completed' triggers in code/config to confirm spelling. The YAML triggers appear as e.g., 'all_activities_completed', 'offboarding_completed', 'employee_enters_stage', 'exit_date', 'deadline_reached'... but those are YAML UI triggers. In DB flow_automations.trigger_type, we need the code values like 'on_enter', 'on_all_activities_complete'?
Actually wait. Search config/automations/offboarding.yaml around line 32 for the trigger ids. And search src for trigger_type values stored e.g., 'on_all_activities_complete' and 'on_offboarding_complete' to verify these are actual engine trigger strings. Let me search.
Tool Calls (3)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/", "migrations/", "config/"], "search_text": "on_offboarding_complete"}
Result
File: config/automations/email_templates.yaml
Match lines: 1
1511| on_offboarding_complete:
File: config/automations/offboarding.yaml
Match lines: 2
67| type: "on_offboarding_complete"
246| # Usada com trigger on_offboarding_complete
File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
Match lines: 2
321| 'triggerType' => 'on_offboarding_complete',
324| 'conditions' => [['type' => 'on_offboarding_complete', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0]],
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystem/FlowKanbanController.php
Match lines: 6
1503| // ✅ DISPARAR AUTOMAÇÕES: on_offboarding_complete
1505| error_log('[MOVE] 🔔 Disparando automações de on_offboarding_complete via Kanban...');
1532| // Filtrar apenas automações com trigger on_offboarding_complete
1536| if (($c['type'] ?? '') === 'on_offboarding_complete') return true;
6316| // ✅ DISPARAR AUTOMAÇÕES: on_offboarding_complete
6318| error_log('[MOVE-MEMBER] 🔔 Disparando automações de on_offboarding_complete via Kanban...');
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystemController.php
Match lines: 10
5527| 'triggerType' => 'on_offboarding_complete',
5531| ['type' => 'on_offboarding_complete', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0],
5625| 'triggerType' => 'on_offboarding_complete',
5629| ['type' => 'on_offboarding_complete', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0],
16227| // ✅ DISPARAR AUTOMAÇÕES: on_offboarding_complete
16229| error_log('[MOVE] 🔔 Disparando automações de on_offboarding_complete via Kanban...');
16256| // Filtrar apenas automações com trigger on_offboarding_complete
16260| if (($c['type'] ?? '') === 'on_offboarding_complete') return true;
20866| // ✅ DISPARAR AUTOMAÇÕES: on_offboarding_complete
20868| error_log('[MOVE-MEMBER] 🔔 Disparando automações de on_offboarding_complete via Kanban...');
File: src/Controller/OffboardingMemberController.php
Match lines: 12
597| error_log('[markOffboardingCompleted] 🔔 Disparando automações on_offboarding_complete');
598| $this->triggerFlowAutomations($member, $currentStep, 'on_offboarding_complete', [
1821| 'on_offboarding_complete', // Conclusão do offboarding = Automático
2940| * Usado para disparar triggers como on_all_activities_complete, on_enter, on_offboarding_complete, etc.
3081| case 'on_offboarding_complete':
3280| if ($conditionId === 'on_offboarding_complete') {
3281| error_log("[DEBUG] ✓ Condição identificada: 'on_offboarding_complete'");
3303| error_log("[DEBUG] ✅✅✅ MATCH ENCONTRADO! on_offboarding_complete + move_to_next_stage");
3316| error_log("[DEBUG] ⏭️ Não é a última etapa - on_offboarding_complete não se aplica");
3618| // ✅ DISPARAR AUTOMAÇÕES ANTES de mover o membro para "Concluído": a automação on_offboarding_complete
3621| error_log("[DEBUG] 🔔 Disparando automações de 'on_offboarding_complete'...");
3622| $this->triggerFlowAutomations($member, $currentStep, 'on_offboarding_complete', [
File: src/EventListener/FlowStageEventListener.php
Match lines: 2
1052| * Trigger: on_offboarding_complete
1071| return $this->executeAutomationsForTrigger($stage, 'on_offboarding_complete', $member, $context);
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 1
5385| 'on_offboarding_complete', 'on_onboarding_complete', 'on_assessment_complete',
File: src/Service/WorkflowOrchestratorBuiltinStages.php
Match lines: 4
550| 'triggerType' => 'on_offboarding_complete',
554| ['type' => 'on_offboarding_complete', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0],
648| 'triggerType' => 'on_offboarding_complete',
652| ['type' => 'on_offboarding_complete', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0],
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/", "migrations/", "config/"], "search_text": "on_all_activities_complete"}
Result
Note: The results have been truncated. Only showing first 100 results.
File: config/automations/assessment.yaml
Match lines: 1
22| type: "on_all_activities_complete_plus_days"
File: config/automations/ciclos.yaml
Match lines: 2
15| type: "on_all_activities_complete"
21| type: "on_all_activities_complete_plus_days"
File: config/automations/email_templates.yaml
Match lines: 6
321| on_all_activities_complete:
422| on_all_activities_complete_plus_days:
1095| on_all_activities_complete:
1303| on_all_activities_complete_plus_days:
2026| on_all_activities_complete:
2889| on_all_activities_complete_plus_days:
File: config/automations/offboarding.yaml
Match lines: 3
40| type: "on_all_activities_complete"
51| type: "on_all_activities_complete_plus_days"
143| # Ex: offboarding-on_all_activities_complete-employee
File: config/automations/onboarding.yaml
Match lines: 3
22| type: "on_all_activities_complete"
33| type: "on_all_activities_complete_plus_days"
125| # Ex: onboarding-on_all_activities_complete-employee
File: config/automations/processo_seletivo.yaml
Match lines: 1
59| type: "on_all_activities_complete"
File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
Match lines: 2
305| 'triggerType' => 'on_all_activities_complete',
308| 'conditions' => [['type' => 'on_all_activities_complete', 'config' => ['value' => 100], 'orderIndex' => 0]],
File: src/Command/ProcessScheduledAutomationsCommand.php
Match lines: 10
31| * - Processar automações com trigger on_all_activities_complete_plus_days
152| // 6. Processar automações de atividades + dias (on_all_activities_complete_plus_days)
726| * Processa automações com trigger on_all_activities_complete_plus_days
733| // Buscar todas as automações ativas com trigger on_all_activities_complete_plus_days
734| $automations = $this->findAutomationsByTrigger('on_all_activities_complete_plus_days', $companyId);
754| if (in_array(($condition['type'] ?? ''), ['on_all_activities_complete_plus_days', 'assessment_completed_plus_days'], true)) {
795| // Disparar evento on_all_activities_complete_plus_days
807| $this->log('warning', 'Automação on_all_activities_complete_plus_days sem sucesso real; mantendo elegível para retry', [
1358| 'on_all_activities_complete_plus_days' => [
1359| 'on_all_activities_complete_plus_days',
File: src/Controller/BpmTemplateController.php
Match lines: 3
196| 'on_all_activities_complete', ['percentage' => 100],
208| 'on_all_activities_complete', ['percentage' => 100],
221| 'on_all_activities_complete', ['percentage' => 100],
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystem/FlowAutomationController.php
Match lines: 3
801| // 'onboarding-on_all_activities_complete-employee',
802| // 'onboarding-on_all_activities_complete-manager',
1489| 'on_all_activities_complete' => 'Ao completar todas atividades',
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystem/FlowTemplateController.php
Match lines: 3
636| 'on_all_activities_complete' => 'Ao completar todas atividades',
2014| // ✅ CORREÇÃO CRÍTICA: Etapa 2 com stage_change DEVE usar on_all_activities_complete
2019| $triggerType = 'on_all_activities_complete';
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystemController.php
Match lines: 9
1188| // 'onboarding-on_all_activities_complete-employee',
1189| // 'onboarding-on_all_activities_complete-manager',
1438| 'on_all_activities_complete' => 'Ao completar todas atividades',
3794| // ✅ CORREÇÃO CRÍTICA: Etapa 2 com stage_change DEVE usar on_all_activities_complete
3800| $triggerType = 'on_all_activities_complete';
5444| 'triggerType' => 'on_all_activities_complete',
5450| ['type' => 'on_all_activities_complete', 'config' => ['percentage' => 100], 'orderIndex' => 0],
5598| 'triggerType' => 'on_all_activities_complete',
5602| ['type' => 'on_all_activities_complete', 'config' => ['value' => 100], 'orderIndex' => 0],
File: src/Controller/OffboardingMemberController.php
Match lines: 17
1189| // ✅ DISPARAR AUTOMAÇÕES: on_all_activities_complete quando TODOS os steps da flow stage estão completos
1193| error_log("[DEBUG] >>> DISPARO on_all_activities_complete (todos os steps da flow stage concluídos: {$stageCompletedCount}/{$stageTotalCount})");
1194| $triggeredCount = $this->triggerFlowAutomations($member, $step, 'on_all_activities_complete', [
1201| error_log("[DEBUG] <<< FIM disparo on_all_activities_complete (automações executadas: {$triggeredCount}, automationsAlreadyTriggered=" . ($automationsAlreadyTriggered ? 'true' : 'false') . ")");
1205| error_log("[DEBUG] ⏭️ on_all_activities_complete NÃO disparado: currentStep=" . ($step ? $stepId : 'null') . ", allStageActivitiesCompleted=" . ($allStageActivitiesCompleted ? 'true' : 'false') . ", stageProgress={$stageCompletedCount}/{$stageTotalCount}");
1213| // ✅ Verificar se o triggerFlowAutomations (on_all_activities_complete) já avançou o membro
1817| // Suporta tanto formato do banco (on_all_activities_complete) quanto legacy (all_activities_completed)
1819| 'on_all_activities_complete', 'all_activities_completed',
2940| * Usado para disparar triggers como on_all_activities_complete, on_enter, on_offboarding_complete, etc.
2944| * @param string $triggerType Tipo de trigger (on_all_activities_complete, on_enter, etc.)
3052| case 'on_all_activities_complete':
3053| error_log("[DEBUG] Disparando automações on_all_activities_complete na FlowStage correta...");
3058| 'on_all_activities_complete',
3224| if (in_array($conditionId, ['all_activities_completed', 'on_all_activities_complete'])) {
3324| if (in_array($conditionId, ['all_activities_completed_plus_days', 'on_all_activities_complete_plus_days'])) {
4015| 'on_all_activities_complete',
4017| 'on_all_activities_complete_plus_days'
File: src/Controller/OnboardingMemberController.php
Match lines: 12
629| // ✅ DISPARAR AUTOMAÇÕES: on_all_activities_complete quando TODOS os steps da flow stage estão completos
633| error_log("[DEBUG] >>> DISPARO on_all_activities_complete (todos os steps da flow stage concluídos: {$stageCompletedCount}/{$stageTotalCount})");
634| $triggeredCount = $this->triggerFlowAutomations($member, $currentStep, 'on_all_activities_complete', [
641| error_log("[DEBUG] <<< FIM disparo on_all_activities_complete (automações executadas: {$triggeredCount}, automationsAlreadyTriggered=" . ($automationsAlreadyTriggered ? 'true' : 'false') . ")");
643| error_log("[DEBUG] ⏭️ on_all_activities_complete NÃO disparado: currentStep=" . ($currentStep ? $stepId : 'null') . ", allStageActivitiesCompleted=" . ($allStageActivitiesCompleted ? 'true' : 'false') . ", stageProgress={$stageCompletedCount}/{$stageTotalCount}");
650| // ✅ Verificar se o triggerFlowAutomations (on_all_activities_complete) já avançou o membro
1470| * Usado para disparar triggers como on_all_activities_complete, on_enter, etc.
1508| case 'on_all_activities_complete':
3099| 'on_all_activities_complete',
3101| 'on_all_activities_complete_plus_days'
3254| if (in_array($conditionId, ['all_activities_completed', 'on_all_activities_complete'])) {
3377| if (in_array($conditionId, ['all_activities_completed_plus_days', 'on_all_activities_complete_plus_days'])) {
File: src/EventListener/FlowStageEventListener.php
Match lines: 18
147| // NÃO devem disparar on_all_activities_complete via contagem de atividades FlowStage.
173| error_log('[ON_ENTER] All activities complete on stage enter - also triggering on_all_activities_complete (completed=' . ($progressContext['completedCount'] ?? 0) . ', total=' . ($progressContext['totalCount'] ?? 0) . ')');
176| $this->executeAutomationsForTrigger($stage, 'on_all_activities_complete', $member, array_merge($context, $progressContext))
179| error_log('[ON_ENTER] Variable flow stage with 0 activities - skipping on_all_activities_complete (onboarding system will trigger it when activities are completed)');
191| // Se sim, disparar on_all_activities_complete na etapa do orquestrador.
685| // Trigger on_all_activities_complete with progress (e.g. "Candidato finalizar X% das atividades da etapa")
747| * Trigger: on_all_activities_complete (com context completedCount e totalCount)
764| return $this->executeAutomationsForTrigger($stage, 'on_all_activities_complete', $member, $context);
990| * Trigger: on_all_activities_complete_plus_days (chamado pelo scheduler)
1006| return $this->executeAutomationsForTrigger($stage, 'on_all_activities_complete_plus_days', $member, $context);
1393| * "ao entrar na etapa" com condição "100% atividades" tem TriggerType=on_enter e condition type=on_all_activities_complete).
1411| 'on_all_activities_complete' => ['all_activities_completed', 'on_all_activities_complete'],
1412| 'on_all_activities_complete_plus_days' => ['all_activities_completed_plus_days', 'on_all_activities_complete_plus_days', 'assessment_completed_plus_days'],
1514| * Returns context with completedCount and totalCount for the current stage (for on_all_activities_complete trigger).
1754| * on_all_activities_complete na etapa do orquestrador para avançar o ciclo.
1904| '[CycleProducts] TODOS os produtos completaram! Disparando on_all_activities_complete na etapa "%s" do orquestrador (member %d)',
1911| 'on_all_activities_complete',
1925| * e on_all_activities_complete NÃO deve disparar na entrada do stage.
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 12
5368| 'assessment_completed_plus_days' => 'on_all_activities_complete_plus_days',
5389| 'on_all_activities_complete' => $this->evaluateActivitiesPercentageCondition($config, $context),
5507| 'assessment_completed_plus_days' => 'on_all_activities_complete_plus_days',
5526| 'on_all_activities_complete' => ['on_all_activities_complete', 'on_enter'],
5527| 'on_all_activities_complete_plus_days' => ['scheduler_check', 'all_activities_completed_plus_days', 'on_all_activities_complete_plus_days', 'assessment_completed_plus_days'],
6577| // Variável 'days' - usado em on_days_in_stage, on_days_after_start, on_all_activities_complete_plus_days
6584| if (in_array($triggerType, ['on_all_activities_complete', 'on_all_activities_complete_plus_days'])) {
6593| 'on_all_activities_complete' => 'Atividades concluídas',
6594| 'on_all_activities_complete_plus_days' => 'Atividades concluídas + dias',
12226| return 'on_all_activities_complete_plus_days';
14563| if ($trigger === 'on_all_activities_complete' || $trigger === 'on_any_activity_complete') {
14564| $scope = $trigger === 'on_all_activities_complete' ? 'todas as atividades' : 'uma atividade';
File: src/Service/FlowAutomationInfoService.php
Match lines: 1
248| case 'on_all_activities_complete_plus_days':
File: src/Service/ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier.php
Match lines: 1
1099| && $trigger === 'on_all_activities_complete'
File: src/Service/WorkflowOrchestratorBuiltinStages.php
Match lines: 4
470| 'triggerType' => 'on_all_activities_complete',
476| ['type' => 'on_all_activities_complete', 'config' => ['percentage' => 100], 'orderIndex' => 0],
621| 'triggerType' => 'on_all_activities_complete',
625| ['type' => 'on_all_activities_complete', 'config' => ['value' => 100], 'orderIndex' => 0],
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/", "config/"], "search_text": "offboarding_completed"}
Result
File: config/automations/offboarding.yaml Match lines: 7 66| - id: "offboarding_completed" 190| - "offboarding_completed" 220| - "offboarding_completed" 255| - "offboarding_completed" 291| - "offboarding_completed" 394| - id: "advance_offboarding_completed" 397| condition_type: "offboarding_completed" File: src/Controller/OffboardingMemberController.php Match lines: 2 601| 'source' => 'mark_offboarding_completed', 621| 'source' => 'mark_offboarding_completed', File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 1 9415| 'result' => 'offboarding_completed'
Request #7
deepseek-v4-flash
P:107.91K C:718 CR:103.3K CW:0
6308ms
Reasoning
So 'on_all_activities_complete' and 'on_offboarding_complete' are valid trigger_type values. Good.
Now let me focus on the seed migration's `conditions` vs trigger types consistency. In the migration seeded automation: 'Criar Processo Seletivo ao concluir offboarding' with triggerType 'on_offboarding_complete' and actionType 'create_processo_seletivo'. And the 'Criar rascunho...' automation with triggerType 'on_enter' actionType 'create_esocial_s2299_draft'.
Wait, but for the final stage, they want the draft automation to trigger on entering final stage (on_enter), as allowed_triggers says action only usable with employee_enters_stage. Fine.
But note: stage 3 automation for draft uses trigger 'on_enter', while the UI config's allowed trigger is 'employee_enters_stage'. Are 'on_enter' and 'employee_enters_stage' consistent? In DB, 'on_enter' is the internal trigger string (seen in many seeds). In the YAML they list trigger ids for the UI: 'employee_enters_stage'. Both coexist; mapping perhaps UI id -> code on_enter. Fine.
Now consider a subtle but real issue in seeded flow stages: flow_stages of a template have product_id = offboardingProductId (not null), whereas prior seed Version20260518151423 inserted stages with product_id NULL and product_slot_index presumably null. In our migration's ensureStage, they check `product_slot_index IS NULL AND LOWER(name)=...` and insert with product_id = productId. Is product_id column intended for stages with products, while product_slot_index for multi-product slot? If the flow template is multi-product (e.g., the workflow has several products each with its own columns/stages), then setting product_id on the stages and product_slot_index NULL... Actually let's check flow_stages semantics: there may be a requirement that template stages for a specific product have product_slot_index set to some index. Looking at the flow_template_products insert uses slot_index = 0, order_index 0, template_type fixo. flow_stages has both product_id and product_slot_index; the stage select filters product_slot_index IS NULL. Hmm.
Given the templates system is complex, and the migration seeds into generic structures, I can't validate fully. Since the plan asks mainly to check idempotency and scope issues, I'll be careful.
Let me now examine crucial code in the new action within AutomationExecutionService for a possible real functional bug:
At 14952 line etc: Let me read executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft fully (14930-15220) to double-check logic issues and potential bugs to report (e.g., flushing twice, notification when draft only, or the comparison on getDismissalDate when it returns null).
Let me read lines 14930-15300.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 15100, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 14930}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15387)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 14930-15100
14930| return $this->offboardingToRecruitment->createFromOffboarding($member, $config, $context);
14931| }
14932|
14933| private function executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
14934| {
14935| if (!$member instanceof FlowInstanceMember) {
14936| return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Membro não encontrado'];
14937| }
14938|
14939| if ($member->getSourceType() !== 'offboarding') {
14940| return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Esta ação só pode ser usada em contexto de offboarding'];
14941| }
14942|
14943| $flowInstance = $member->getFlowInstance();
14944| $company = $flowInstance?->getCompany();
14945| if (!$company instanceof Company || $company->getEsocialMode() === null) {
14946| return ['executed' => false, 'skipped' => true, 'reason' => 'esocial_disabled'];
14947| }
14948|
14949| try {
14950| $offboardingMember = $this->findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember($member);
14951| if (!$offboardingMember) {
14952| return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'OffboardingMember não encontrado'];
14953| }
14954|
14955| $companyMember = $offboardingMember->getCompanyMember();
14956| if (!$companyMember instanceof CompanyMembers) {
14957| return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Colaborador do offboarding não encontrado'];
14958| }
14959|
14960| $responsible = $this->resolveEsocialS2299Responsible($config, $member, $offboardingMember);
14961| if (!$responsible instanceof CompanyMembers) {
14962| $this->log('warning', 'Responsável do S-2299 não resolvido para automação de offboarding', [
14963| 'flowInstanceMemberId' => $member->getId(),
14964| 'offboardingMemberId' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
14965| ]);
14966|
14967| return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Responsável pelo preenchimento do S-2299 não encontrado'];
14968| }
14969|
14970| $esocialTrabalhador = $this->entityManager
14971| ->getRepository(EsocialDadosTrabalhador::class)
14972| ->findOneBy(['companyMember' => $companyMember]);
14973|
14974| $draftService = $this->getOffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService();
14975|
14976| $payload = $draftService->buildDraftPayload($offboardingMember, $companyMember, $responsible, $config);
14977| $event = null;
14978| $eventStatus = 'draft_only';
14979| $missing = [];
14980|
14981| if (!$esocialTrabalhador instanceof EsocialDadosTrabalhador) {
14982| $missing[] = 'esocial_worker_data';
14983| } else {
14984| $remuneracao = $this->entityManager
14985| ->getRepository(EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class)
14986| ->findByTrabalhador($esocialTrabalhador);
14987|
14988| if (!$remuneracao instanceof EsocialDadosRemuneracao) {
14989| $missing[] = 'esocial_remuneration_data';
14990| } else {
14991| $event = $draftService->findEventLinkedToOffboarding($member, $offboardingMember, $company, $esocialTrabalhador, $remuneracao);
14992| if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $event->getStatus() !== 'pendente') {
14993| $eventStatus = 'existing_not_editable';
14994| } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
14995| $event->setUpdatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
14996| $eventStatus = 'updated';
14997| } else {
14998| $event = $draftService->findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal($company, $esocialTrabalhador, $remuneracao, $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate());
14999| if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
15000| $eventStatus = 'existing_not_editable';
15001| } else {
15002| // Reaproveita rascunho pendente pré-existente (inclusive criado manualmente
15003| // via saveEventS2299) para o mesmo colaborador/data, evitando S-2299 duplicado.
15004| $event = $draftService->findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal($company, $esocialTrabalhador, $remuneracao, $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate());
15005| if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
15006| $event->setUpdatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
15007| $eventStatus = 'updated';
15008| } else {
15009| $event = $draftService->createDraftEvent($company, $esocialTrabalhador);
15010| $eventStatus = 'created';
15011| }
15012| }
15013| }
15014|
15015| if ($eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable') {
15016| $event->setDadosRemuneracao($remuneracao);
15017| $draftService->applyPayload($event, $payload, $eventStatus === 'updated');
15018| $this->entityManager->persist($event);
15019| }
15020| }
15021| }
15022|
15023| $reviewUrl = $draftService->buildReviewUrl($companyMember);
15024| $metadata = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? [];
15025| if (!is_array($metadata)) {
15026| $metadata = [];
15027| }
15028|
15029| $metadata['esocialS2299Draft'] = [
15030| 'payload' => $payload,
15031| 'offboardingMemberId' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
15032| 'companyMemberId' => $companyMember->getId(),
15033| 'responsibleId' => $responsible->getId(),
15034| 'eventId' => $event?->getId(),
15035| 'eventStatus' => $eventStatus,
15036| 'missing' => $missing,
15037| 'reviewUrl' => $reviewUrl,
15038| 'updatedAt' => (new \DateTimeImmutable())->format('c'),
15039| ];
15040|
15041| $member->setSourceMetadata($metadata);
15042| $this->entityManager->persist($member);
15043| $this->entityManager->flush();
15044|
15045| if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
15046| $metadata = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? [];
15047| $metadata['esocialS2299Draft']['eventId'] = $event->getId();
15048| $member->setSourceMetadata($metadata);
15049| $this->entityManager->persist($member);
15050| $this->entityManager->flush();
15051| }
15052|
15053| $notificationTitle = 'Revisar desligamento eSocial (S-2299)';
15054| $notificationMessage = $eventStatus === 'updated'
15055| ? 'O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi atualizado com a data de desligamento atual do offboarding. Os demais campos já preenchidos foram preservados. Abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar os detalhes.'
15056| : 'O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding. Abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar os detalhes.';
15057| $notificationMessageHtml = $eventStatus === 'updated'
15058| ? '<p>O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi atualizado com a data de desligamento atual do offboarding.</p><p>Os demais campos já preenchidos foram preservados; revise-os antes de enviar.</p>'
15059| : '<p>O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding.</p>';
15060| $reviewButtonHtml = '<p style="margin-top:1.25rem;"><a href="' . htmlspecialchars($reviewUrl, ENT_QUOTES, 'UTF-8') . '" style="display:inline-block;background-color:#277591;color:#ffffff;padding:10px 16px;border-radius:6px;font-weight:bold;text-decoration:none;">Revisar desligamento eSocial</a></p>';
15061|
15062| if ($eventStatus === 'existing_not_editable') {
15063| $notificationTitle = 'S-2299 oficial já existe e não foi alterado';
15064| $notificationMessage = 'Já existe um evento S-2299 oficial para {{member_name}} e ele não pode ser editado pelo offboarding. Abra o chat com a Adriana para conferir a situação antes de seguir.';
15065| $notificationMessageHtml = '<p>Já existe um evento S-2299 oficial para {{member_name}} e ele não pode ser editado pelo offboarding.</p><p>Confira a situação no chat com a Adriana antes de seguir.</p>';
15066| } elseif (!empty($missing)) {
15067| $missingLabels = [
15068| 'esocial_worker_data' => 'dados do trabalhador',
15069| 'esocial_remuneration_data' => 'dados de remuneração',
15070| ];
15071| $missingDescription = implode(' e ', array_map(
15072| static fn (string $item): string => $missingLabels[$item] ?? $item,
15073| $missing
15074| ));
15075|
15076| $notificationTitle = 'Dados eSocial pendentes para gerar S-2299';
15077| $notificationMessage = 'O S-2299 de {{member_name}} ainda não foi criado porque faltam ' . $missingDescription . '. Complete os dados e abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar.';
15078| $notificationMessageHtml = '<p>O S-2299 de {{member_name}} ainda não foi criado porque faltam ' . $missingDescription . '.</p><p>Complete os dados e abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar.</p>';
15079| }
15080|
15081| $notification = $this->executeNotify([
15082| 'to' => 'company_member',
15083| 'company_member_id' => (string) $responsible->getId(),
15084| 'title' => $notificationTitle,
15085| 'message' => $notificationMessage,
15086| 'message_html' => $notificationMessageHtml . $reviewButtonHtml,
15087| 'system_sender' => true,
15088| ], $member, array_merge($context, [
15089| 'member_id' => (string) $companyMember->getId(),
15090| 'esocial_s2299_review_url' => $reviewUrl,
15091| ]));
15092|
15093| return [
15094| 'success' => true,
15095| 'message' => $event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable'
15096| ? 'Rascunho do S-2299 criado/atualizado e responsável notificado'
15097| : ($eventStatus === 'existing_not_editable'
15098| ? 'Rascunho do S-2299 registrado; já existe evento oficial não editável para este trabalhador'
15099| : 'Rascunho do S-2299 registrado; dados eSocial pendentes impedem criar o evento oficial'),
15100| 'offboardingMemberId' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
Request #8
deepseek-v4-flash
P:111.54K C:3.12K CR:108.54K CW:0
25739ms
Reasoning
I now have the full new action code. Let me look for actual defects.
Key subtle point: On second flush they re-read member metadata and set eventId; but that's only when event instanceof and eventStatus not existing_not_editable? Wait if eventStatus == 'existing_not_editable' and event instanceof, they still persist the metadata + flush twice with eventId = getId of the official event. That's fine, the metadata stores eventId even if not editable. OK.
One real bug candidate: `$eventStatus === 'updated'` triggers when linked event pendente OR pending draft found via findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal. applyPayload with onlyEmptyFields=true. But note new draft event path `$eventStatus = 'created'`: applyPayload(..., onlyEmptyFields=false) → fills all payload fields. Payload includes `motivoDesligamento` => config['motivoDesligamento'] ?? config['mtvDeslig'] ?? ''. But wait config default in buildDraftPayload sets many keys to '' if missing. applyPayloadValue only sets if value !== null. Empty string values for motivoDesligamento → stringOrNull('') returns null → skip. Good.
Now the concern about the `member` being used to resolve the offboarding: findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember. Let me read it to see if metadata or activitiesProgress used, but not critical.
Let me also look at `resolveEsocialS2299Responsible` (15100-15150) and `getOffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService` and rest of the method, then examine the OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal for a functional bug: when dismissalDate present, query builder `->andWhere('event.dtDeslig = :dismissalDate OR event.dtDeslig IS NULL')`. Suppose multiple pending drafts exist (one with old date, one with NULL date). The one with NULL date might be matched and updated to the new date — updating a draft that was deliberately left without date (e.g., a draft created from offboarding before date filled, still the same). Fine.
But there is also a genuine bug: dtDeslig is stored as `date` type. `$dismissalDate->format('Y-m-d')` compared to string parameter. Doctrine converts the param to DateType automatically if the field is a date field with parameter... In QueryBuilder, setParameter with raw string 'Y-m-d' matches DB date string comparison. OK.
Now, main new-method bug candidates:
1. Duplicate-event-after-date-change as discussed (medium, real).
2. Metadata eventId second flush issue: if event persisted and then metadata set with getId — note metadata array was already persisted & flushed in first flush with eventId null. Second persist+flush with eventId; fine.
3. Notifications: executeNotify with 'company_member' recipient, but the responsible member may not have a user (getUser null). executeNotify: for each user... resolveRecipients('company_member', $member, $recipientContext) uses company_member_id config; if responsible CompanyMembers has no linked user, notification not sent. Also note they don't verify responsible->getUser() non-null. Might be OK.
4. Testability etc.
Now cross-check: The action only allowed with 'employee_enters_stage' trigger per YAML; but migration seeds it with trigger 'on_enter' in the final stage. That is consistent with entering the stage.
Now look at potential concurrency: two actions on entering final stage; not critical.
Now, given the config YAML only allows trigger `employee_enters_stage`, but is `employee_enters_stage` a UI-only trigger id? And in migration, the automation inserted has triggerType on_enter and conditions type on_enter; that matches conventions.
Next, verify the claim that seeded 'create_processo_seletivo' action type exists: search shows it was existing.
Now let me consider the more consequential part to verify: the "god object" finding (#1) and the system_sender (#5). For #5, I'd like to know whether automation action config is fully user-editable JSON (allowing arbitrary keys like system_sender) or filtered to a preset list. Check how automation actions get stored: probably a controller saving `actions` JSON from the front with whatever fields. Search for where automation actions config is saved/whitelisted. Search FlowAutomationController for action config building. But system_sender is only honored inside executeNotify/executeSendEmail path used by this new action — note executeNotify is generic (many actions call it) and now reads `$config['system_sender']`. If an end-user can put `system_sender: true` in the action config of a regular "notify" action (which they configure in the flow builder), they could make messages appear as Adriana. How does the flow builder store config? It probably takes the YAML action definition with a fixed set of editable fields and constructs config from form. But the stored JSON 'actions' inside flow_automations is written by controllers with many possibilities. Given the enormity of the codebase, this is a plausible but not confirmed path. Given review principle precision-over-recall and no evidence that users can inject arbitrary config keys, I might down-rate to "low/medium note" or skip.
Given constraints, let me decide which findings to report with solid code evidence:
**Finding A (medium/high)**: `findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal` filters pending drafts by equality with current dismissal date, so a manual pending draft created before a dismissal-date change is not reused; automation creates a second pending S-2299 (duplicate), violating idempotency that the code comment claims. The comment itself says it matches "mesmo colaborador/data"; when data changed, that's exactly when duplicates would happen (member reached final stage again). Report as medium severity with precise line: in OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal — the `andWhere('event.dtDeslig = :dismissalDate OR event.dtDeslig IS NULL')`. Actually code added lines; must target newly added lines. This is a new file, so all lines are added. Good.
**Finding B (medium)**: In AutomationExecutionService new action, treats any non-'pendente' event found via metadata or via findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal as "official and not editable". But existing esocial event statuses include 'erro no processamento' (from EnviarEventoMessageHandler / EsocialEventBatchResponseRepository), 'processado', 'enviado'. If the prior event errored (not actually accepted by eSocial), the offboarding final stage will notify "já existe evento oficial" and never create/update a draft, a dead-end. Should restrict "not editable" to definitive statuses only, or treat errored events as editable/re-sendable. Need to confirm statuses used for S-2299. Search in EsocialEventBatchRepository etc. was generic across event classes (all esocial events use same tables with status). Since the code may be generic, the statuses 'enviado', 'processado', 'erro no processamento' apply to S-2299 too. So there is real risk. Report as medium.
Let me verify by searching for S-2299-specific sending path. There is EnviarEventoMessageHandler used for all events; events processed generically set statuses. Search statuses in message handler near S-2299 class references. Let me search 'EsocialS2299' occurrences in src to see usage of S2299-specific.
**Finding C (low)**: down() leaves child records and replay would duplicate template. Confirmed by reading down/up. But wait: up() actually reconciles if template still has seed_migration. After down, seed_migration is removed and template is_active=0. If someone reruns up() after down (e.g., migration rollback then forward again in dev), duplicates accumulate. Also the down() deletes workflow_products only conditionally. Child stage/activity/automation rows remain. Low severity. Report low.
**Finding D (low)**: Actually about migration `return;` early on missing tables: If some tables exist and others don't, returns silently; but migration list includes 'features' etc. If any missing, nothing inserted. On a fresh environment with all tables, fine. Fine.
**Finding E (medium/high)**: God object — service already 15k lines with >500 methods; new ~250-line orchestration added. Report high per user priorities (they explicitly rank god-object first for this file). Actually the priorities for AutomationExecutionService user rules say god object/lógica duplicada = maior peso. So report high: new orchestration inside executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft duplicates domain logic, whereas the whole point of the new dedicated service was to avoid this; only entity mapping was extracted. Suggest moving orchestration into the dedicated service. This is consistent with what the plan says.
**Finding F**: `system_sender` opens Adriana impersonation. Need to check if it's exposed through user-editable action config (e.g., send_email). If arbitrary, report medium security. Let me search for where notify/send_email actions config is built from user input. Let me search the YAML config for send_email actions to see fields; also check UI backend that saves automation actions, e.g., FlowAutomationController saveAction. But time constraints. Let me at least check whether config can contain arbitrary keys when automations saved: look for where flow_automations actions are updated from request. Possibly huge. Given uncertainty, I'll frame as medium maintainability/security with clear condition, anchored to the new line where `system_sender` is now honored from arbitrary `$config` (line 13918 change). The changed code broadens the channel from payroll-only to any config flag. Even if UI cannot currently set it, any backend automation config can. Actually more concretely: within this diff, config is only set internally (15087). But executeNotify is a public-ish internal dispatcher for many actions. Hmm.
Actually, is there a genuine risk introduced? The action `send_email`/`request_notification` config `system_sender` would be honored whenever someone (internal code) sets it. But any action stored in DB config for those actions goes through executeNotify→executeSendEmail only when the config comes from the action's config. If users can define notification actions and set arbitrary fields in the actions JSON (e.g., via the flow editor's action config), they could add system_sender. Let me search for an endpoint that persists flow automation actions to check whether fields are whitelisted. Let me search for 'actions' set in flow_automations in controllers: FlowAutomationController. Look at how the actions JSON is assembled. Might be `$data['actions']` directly from request JSON.
Let me search 'setActions' in controllers.
Actually let me search for `'system_sender'` in templates/assets to see if the front exposes it. code_search returned only the three in src. So no front exposes system_sender explicitly. But arbitrary JSON from client could still include it if not stripped. Hard to prove.
Let me check the front-end building automation config to see whether the config stored is the raw action object from the UI, which may allow arbitrary keys. Search assets for 'send_email' config fields e.g. 'approve_url'. Search templates for automation config.
This could take a while. Given the instructions to be precise and not speculative, I'll consider skipping #5 unless I find evidence. Let me do a couple of targeted searches: FlowAutomationController for how actions are persisted; check if there's validation.
Also confirm #2 finding: type change int → string. I'm fairly convinced it's not a regression given DBAL decimal = string and repo files without strict types. But wait: is there a Twig or code that calls setPercAliment with an int literal? The plan searched only set/get. Existing calls: repository saveEventS2299 passes request value; FlowableVariablesService reads; ESocialDataService reads. So no strict callers pass int. So no TypeError regression within repo. The change is beneficial. I will NOT report #2. Actually, wait: there's an inconsistency now introduced — entity EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino has percAliment/vrAlim ?int while S2299 ?string. Not a bug from this diff. Skip.
Actually there's one more angle: previously setPercAliment(?int) meant repository passing request strings would be coerced silently (e.g., '12.50' → 12). Not reported by review plan but the fix is the PR's own commit 06bd2e58. The other entity S2399 still has ?int and its repo passes raw values from request to a decimal column... out of scope.
Now let me read lines 15100-15210 to see resolveEsocialS2299Responsible and getOffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService, and read the findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember method for data-source isolation (between companies?). Also read findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal & findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal lines in the service.
Let me also verify the offboarding.yaml context for action `create_esocial_s2299_draft` structure: allowed_triggers list and blocked_triggers. In the YAML, is it at top-level actions as expected? Let's read offboarding.yaml lines 1-230 to verify structure and spelling of keys (yaml rule: check spelling of yaml keys). Compare other action definitions: do other actions have `allowed_triggers`, `blocked_triggers`, `blocked_trigger_message`, `config_preset`? Let's read the file around those lines.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 15180, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 15100}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15387)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 15100-15180
15100| 'offboardingMemberId' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
15101| 'companyMemberId' => $companyMember->getId(),
15102| 'responsibleId' => $responsible->getId(),
15103| 'eventId' => $event?->getId(),
15104| 'eventStatus' => $eventStatus,
15105| 'missing' => $missing,
15106| 'reviewUrl' => $reviewUrl,
15107| 'notification' => $notification,
15108| ];
15109| } catch (\Throwable $e) {
15110| $this->log('error', 'Erro ao criar rascunho S-2299 via offboarding', [
15111| 'error' => $e->getMessage(),
15112| 'memberId' => $member->getId(),
15113| ]);
15114|
15115| return ['success' => false, 'error' => $e->getMessage()];
15116| }
15117| }
15118|
15119| private function resolveEsocialS2299Responsible(array $config, FlowInstanceMember $member, \App\Entity\OffboardingMember $offboardingMember): ?CompanyMembers
15120| {
15121| $configuredId = $config['responsible_id']
15122| ?? $config['responsibleId']
15123| ?? $config['company_member_id']
15124| ?? $config['member_id']
15125| ?? null;
15126|
15127| $flowCompany = $member->getFlowInstance()?->getCompany();
15128|
15129| if ($configuredId) {
15130| $responsible = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find((int) $configuredId);
15131| if (
15132| $responsible instanceof CompanyMembers
15133| && $flowCompany instanceof Company
15134| && $responsible->getCompany()?->getId() === $flowCompany->getId()
15135| ) {
15136| return $responsible;
15137| }
15138| }
15139|
15140| $flowResponsible = $member->getFlowInstance()?->getFlowResponsible();
15141| if ($flowResponsible instanceof CompanyMembers) {
15142| return $flowResponsible;
15143| }
15144|
15145| $offboardingResponsible = $offboardingMember->getOffboarding()?->getOffboardingFlowResponsible();
15146| if ($offboardingResponsible instanceof CompanyMembers) {
15147| return $offboardingResponsible;
15148| }
15149|
15150| return null;
15151| }
15152|
15153| /**
15154| * Obtém o serviço dedicado do rascunho S-2299, criando um fallback lazy caso o
15155| * setter de injeção não tenha sido chamado (mantém compatibilidade com instâncias
15156| * criadas manualmente sem o wiring completo do container).
15157| */
15158| private function getOffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService(): \App\Service\Offboarding\OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService
15159| {
15160| if (!$this->offboardingEsocialS2299DraftService instanceof \App\Service\Offboarding\OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService) {
15161| $this->offboardingEsocialS2299DraftService = new \App\Service\Offboarding\OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService(
15162| $this->entityManager,
15163| $this->router
15164| );
15165| }
15166|
15167| return $this->offboardingEsocialS2299DraftService;
15168| }
15169|
15170| // ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
15171| // VISIBILIDADE E ACESSO - OFFBOARDING
15172| // ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
15173|
15174| /**
15175| * Ação: Aguardar X dias para exibir offboarding ao colaborador
15176| *
15177| * Esta ação configura um delay antes do offboarding ser visível para o colaborador.
15178| * O offboarding só será exibido na tela do colaborador após X dias.
15179| *
15180| * - Define `visible_to_collaborator = false` imediatamente
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 240, "file_path": "config/automations/offboarding.yaml", "start_line": 1}
Result
File: config/automations/offboarding.yaml (Total lines: 481)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-240
1|# Configuração de Automações - Offboarding
2|# Este arquivo define triggers, actions e regras específicos para desligamento de colaboradores
3|
4|product:
5| id: 3
6| name: "Offboarding"
7| slug: "offboarding"
8| entity_name: "Colaborador"
9| entity_name_plural: "Colaboradores"
10|
11|# Triggers (Condições) disponíveis
12|triggers:
13| notifications:
14| - id: "deadline_reached"
15| type: "on_timeout"
16| title: "Prazo desta etapa ser atingido"
17| icon: "fa-solid fa-clock"
18| has_config: false
19|
20| - id: "exit_date"
21| type: "on_exit_date"
22| title: "Data de desligamento chegar"
23| icon: "fa-solid fa-calendar-xmark"
24| has_config: false
25|
26| - id: "any_activity_completed"
27| type: "on_any_activity_complete"
28| title: "Qualquer atividade da etapa ser concluída"
29| icon: "fa-solid fa-tasks"
30| has_config: false
31|
32| - id: "employee_enters_stage"
33| type: "on_enter"
34| title: "Colaborador entrar nesta etapa"
35| icon: "fa-solid fa-arrow-right-to-bracket"
36| has_config: false
37|
38| movement:
39| - id: "all_activities_completed"
40| type: "on_all_activities_complete"
41| title: "Colaborador finalizar X% das atividades da etapa"
42| icon: "fa-solid fa-check-double"
43| has_config: true
44| config_type: "percentage_activities"
45| config_label: "Porcentagem mínima de atividades concluídas"
46| config_options:
47| # Opções geradas dinamicamente no front com base em stageActivitiesCount (25%, 50%, 75%, 100% para 4 atividades, etc.)
48| dynamic_from_stage: true
49|
50| - id: "all_activities_completed_plus_days"
51| type: "on_all_activities_complete_plus_days"
52| title: "Colaborador finalizar todas as atividades da etapa e passar X dias"
53| icon: "fa-solid fa-calendar-check"
54| has_config: true
55| config_type: "dropdown"
56| config_label: "Número de dias após conclusão"
57| config_options:
58| - { id: "1", label: "1 dia" }
59| - { id: "2", label: "2 dias" }
60| - { id: "3", label: "3 dias" }
61| - { id: "5", label: "5 dias" }
62| - { id: "7", label: "7 dias" }
63| - { id: "14", label: "14 dias" }
64| - { id: "30", label: "30 dias" }
65|
66| - id: "offboarding_completed"
67| type: "on_offboarding_complete"
68| title: "Colaborador concluir o offboarding (última etapa)"
69| icon: "fa-solid fa-flag-checkered"
70| has_config: false
71|
72| - id: "days_after_offboarding_start"
73| type: "on_days_after_start"
74| title: "X dias após o início do offboarding"
75| icon: "fa-solid fa-calendar-days"
76| has_config: true
77| config_type: "dropdown"
78| config_label: "Número de dias após início"
79| config_options:
80| - { id: "1", label: "1 dia" }
81| - { id: "2", label: "2 dias" }
82| - { id: "3", label: "3 dias" }
83| - { id: "5", label: "5 dias" }
84| - { id: "7", label: "7 dias" }
85| - { id: "14", label: "14 dias" }
86| - { id: "30", label: "30 dias" }
87| - { id: "60", label: "60 dias" }
88| - { id: "90", label: "90 dias" }
89|
90| - id: "days_in_stage"
91| type: "on_days_in_stage"
92| title: "Colaborador estiver há X dias na mesma etapa"
93| icon: "fa-solid fa-hourglass-half"
94| has_config: true
95| config_type: "dropdown"
96| config_label: "Número de dias na etapa"
97| config_options:
98| - { id: "1", label: "1 dia" }
99| - { id: "2", label: "2 dias" }
100| - { id: "3", label: "3 dias" }
101| - { id: "5", label: "5 dias" }
102| - { id: "7", label: "7 dias" }
103| - { id: "14", label: "14 dias" }
104| - { id: "30", label: "30 dias" }
105|
106|# Actions (Ações) disponíveis
107|actions:
108| notifications:
109| # ---------------------------------------------------------
110| # NOTIFICAÇÕES INTERNAS (Chat/Sistema)
111| # ---------------------------------------------------------
112|
113| # 1. Notificar colaborador
114| - id: "notify_employee"
115| type: "notification"
116| title: "Notificar colaborador"
117| icon: "fa-solid fa-bell"
118| has_config: false
119| config_preset:
120| to: "employee"
121|
122| # 2. Notificar responsável do fluxo
123| - id: "notify_flow_responsible"
124| type: "notification"
125| title: "Notificar responsável do fluxo"
126| icon: "fa-solid fa-user-check"
127| has_config: false
128| config_preset:
129| to: "flow_responsible"
130|
131| # 2.1 Notificar preenchimento eSocial (somente se empresa tiver eSocial habilitado)
132| - id: "notify_esocial_worker_data"
133| type: "notify_esocial_worker_data"
134| title: "Notificar preenchimento de dados do trabalhador e remuneração (eSocial)"
135| icon: "fa-solid fa-id-card-clip"
136| has_config: false
137| config_preset:
138| to: "flow_responsible"
139|
140| # ---------------------------------------------------------
141| # ENVIO DE E-MAILS (SMTP)
142| # Template determinado automaticamente baseado em: trigger + destinatário
143| # Ex: offboarding-on_all_activities_complete-employee
144| # ---------------------------------------------------------
145|
146| # 3. Enviar e-mail para colaborador
147| - id: "send_email_employee"
148| type: "send_email"
149| title: "Enviar e-mail para colaborador"
150| icon: "fa-solid fa-envelope"
151| has_config: false
152| config_preset:
153| to: "employee"
154|
155| # 4. Enviar e-mail para responsável do fluxo
156| - id: "send_email_flow_responsible"
157| type: "send_email"
158| title: "Enviar e-mail para responsável do fluxo"
159| icon: "fa-solid fa-user-gear"
160| has_config: false
161| config_preset:
162| to: "flow_responsible"
163|
164| # ---------------------------------------------------------
165| # NOTIFICAÇÕES ADICIONAIS
166| # ---------------------------------------------------------
167|
168| - id: "send_whatsapp"
169| type: "send_whatsapp"
170| title: "Enviar WhatsApp para colaborador"
171| icon: "fa-brands fa-whatsapp"
172| has_config: false
173|
174| movement:
175| - id: "move_to_next_stage"
176| type: "stage_change"
177| title: "Mover para a próxima etapa"
178| icon: "fa-solid fa-arrow-right"
179| has_config: false
180| description: "Move o colaborador para a próxima etapa do offboarding."
181|
182| - id: "create_esocial_s2299_draft"
183| type: "create_esocial_s2299_draft"
184| title: "Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299)"
185| icon: "fa-solid fa-file-lines"
186| has_config: false
187| allowed_triggers:
188| - "employee_enters_stage"
189| blocked_triggers:
190| - "offboarding_completed"
191| - "exit_date"
192| - "deadline_reached"
193| - "all_activities_completed"
194| - "all_activities_completed_plus_days"
195| - "any_activity_completed"
196| - "days_in_stage"
197| - "days_after_offboarding_start"
198| blocked_trigger_message: "Esta ação só pode ser usada com o trigger 'Colaborador entrar nesta etapa'"
199| description: "Cria ou atualiza o rascunho do evento S-2299 com dados do offboarding e notifica o responsável para revisar o desligamento eSocial."
200| config_preset:
201| to: "flow_responsible"
202|
203| # ---------------------------------------------------------
204| # AÇÕES DE VISIBILIDADE E ACESSO
205| # ---------------------------------------------------------
206|
207| visibility:
208| # Ação disponível APENAS na primeira etapa (ou Etapa Intermediária em flows variáveis)
209| # Usada com trigger on_enter
210| - id: "delay_offboarding_visibility"
211| type: "delay_offboarding_visibility"
212| title: "Aguardar X dias para exibir offboarding ao colaborador"
213| icon: "fa-solid fa-eye-slash"
214| has_config: true
215| config_type: "dropdown"
216| config_label: "Dias para aguardar antes de exibir o offboarding"
217| allowed_triggers:
218| - "employee_enters_stage"
219| blocked_triggers:
220| - "offboarding_completed"
221| - "exit_date"
222| - "deadline_reached"
223| - "all_activities_completed"
224| - "all_activities_completed_plus_days"
225| - "any_activity_completed"
226| - "days_in_stage"
227| - "days_after_offboarding_start"
228| blocked_trigger_message: "Esta ação só pode ser usada com o trigger 'Colaborador entrar nesta etapa'"
229| first_stage_only: true
230| description: "Define um período de espera antes de exibir o offboarding na tela do colaborador. O offboarding só será visível após X dias."
231| config_options:
232| - { id: "1", label: "1 dia" }
233| - { id: "2", label: "2 dias" }
234| - { id: "3", label: "3 dias" }
235| - { id: "5", label: "5 dias" }
236| - { id: "7", label: "7 dias" }
237| - { id: "10", label: "10 dias" }
238| - { id: "14", label: "14 dias" }
239| - { id: "21", label: "21 dias" }
240| - { id: "30", label: "30 dias" }
Request #9
deepseek-v4-flash
P:118.69K C:664 CR:114.56K CW:0
6527ms
Reasoning
The new action in the YAML has keys: id, type, title, icon, has_config, allowed_triggers, blocked_triggers, blocked_trigger_message, description, config_preset. There are no spelling errors in the yaml keys. Compare with the existing action `delay_offboarding_visibility` which uses the same pattern but additionally has `first_stage_only`. It's fine.
Notice: the YAML says `config_preset: to: flow_responsible`, but has_config false. For a new action, they want to define config default. OK.
Now for the trigger block list in YAML they include all movement triggers that aren't employee_enters_stage; good.
Potential subtle YAML issue: none.
Now, examine services.yaml key spelling — looks standard.
Now, let me examine the migration YAML-ish seeds for spelling of column names in SQL against real table columns: flow_stages columns include flow_template_id, product_id, name, description, order_index, advance_rules, stage_category, phase_number, product_slot_index? From the earlier Version20260518151423, flow_stages columns used were (flow_template_id, product_id, name, description, order_index, advance_rules, stage_category, phase_number) — note product_id was NULL in inserts and there was NO product_slot_index column insert; maybe product_slot_index was added later (Version20260518151423 didn't use it). In our migration we insert product_slot_index NULL explicitly. If column exists (needs to exist for select filter). The migration lists tables; it does not verify columns exist (e.g., product_slot_index on flow_stages, slot_index on flow_template_products, seed fields). If a deployment DB lacks those columns, SQL fails. But presumably the schema is shared. Not a strong finding.
The select in ensureStage uses `product_slot_index IS NULL`, meaning it only matches stages inserted by this seed (which pass NULL). If a template already had a stage with same name but different product_slot_index (e.g., created through a different multi-product flow mechanism), it would insert a duplicate stage with product_slot_index NULL. Edge case.
Focus: the more concrete things I can report. Let me finalize what findings to deliver. Before that, quickly verify the S-2299 statuses to validate finding about 'erro no processamento'/others. Where is S-2299 sent? Let me search for EsocialS2299 in MessageHandler/EsocialController to see status transitions applicable.
Also need to confirm that statuses other than pendente, enviado, processado, erro no processamento exist; e.g., 'EXCLUSAO_SOLICITADA', 'DELETED' for exclusion. Let me search quickly S2299 references in src.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/"], "search_text": "EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento"}
Result
File: src/Controller/CompanyController.php
Match lines: 3
34|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
6373| } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $event->getEsocialTrabalhador() !== null) {
6818| 'EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento' => 'Desligamento',
File: src/Controller/CompanyMemberController.php
Match lines: 3
72|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
548| $event = $em->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)->saveEventS2299($esocialTrabalhador, $data, $company, $remuneracao);
766| $blockingS2299 = $em->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)->findOneBy([
File: src/Controller/EsocialEventsController.php
Match lines: 1
25|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
File: src/Entity/EsocialEvents.php
Match lines: 2
31|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
66| * "s2299" = "EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento",
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
Match lines: 3
5|use App\Repository\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository;
9| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass=EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::class)
11|class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento extends EsocialEvents
File: src/Repository/EsocialDadosTrabalhadorRepository.php
Match lines: 2
840| $s2299Events = $em->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
1062| $s2299Events = $em->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2298EvtReintegrRepository.php
Match lines: 2
7|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
123| ->from(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class, 'd')
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
Match lines: 15
5|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
12| * @extends ServiceEntityRepository<EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento>
14| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento|null find($id, $lockMode = null, $lockVersion = null)
15| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento|null findOneBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null)
16| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[] findAll()
17| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[] findBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null, $limit = null, $offset = null)
19|class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository extends ServiceEntityRepository
23| parent::__construct($registry, EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class);
30| public function add(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $entity, bool $flush = true): void
42| public function remove(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $entity, bool $flush = true): void
63| public function saveEventS2299($esocialDadosTrabalhador, $data, $company, $dadosRemuneracao): EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
65| $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
102| * @param int $eventId ID do evento (EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento)
268| // * @return EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[] Returns an array of EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento objects
285| public function findOneBySomeField($value): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 7
40|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
14992| if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $event->getStatus() !== 'pendente') {
14994| } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
14999| if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
15005| if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
15045| if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
15095| 'message' => $event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable'
File: src/Service/FlowableServices/FlowableVariablesService.php
Match lines: 7
15168| * Template: EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento (S-2299 - Desligamento)
15174| * @param int $eventId ID do evento (EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento)
15179| $repository = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class);
18943| \App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class => ['s2299', 'Desligamento'],
19097| \App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class => ['s2299', 'Desligamento'],
19326| \App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class => ['s2299', 'Desligamento'],
19700| $s2299Repo = $em->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class);
File: src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php
Match lines: 12
11|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
35| public function createDraftEvent(Company $company, EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador): EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
37| $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
60| public function applyPayload(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $event, array $payload, bool $onlyEmptyFields = false): void
144| ): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento {
160| ->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
163| if (!$event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
177| ): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento {
183| ->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
215| ): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento {
217| ->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
249| EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $event,
Request #10
deepseek-v4-flash
P:121.02K C:254 CR:119.3K CW:0
2529ms
Reasoning
Let me check the EsocialDadosTrabalhadorRepository usage around line 840 for how S-2299 "official" events and statuses are interpreted elsewhere — to see the domain's status set and whether non-pendente is treated as blocking everywhere.
Let me read EsocialDadosTrabalhadorRepository 820-880 and 1040-1080.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 880, "file_path": "src/Repository/EsocialDadosTrabalhadorRepository.php", "start_line": 820}
Result
File: src/Repository/EsocialDadosTrabalhadorRepository.php (Total lines: 1111)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 820-880
820| }
821|
822| // S-2298 - Reintegração
823| $s2298Events = $em->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2298EvtReintegr::class)
824| ->createQueryBuilder('e')
825| ->where('e.esocialTrabalhador = :trabalhador')
826| ->setParameter('trabalhador', $trabalhador)
827| ->getQuery()
828| ->getResult();
829| foreach ($s2298Events as $event) {
830| $events[] = [
831| 'id' => $event->getId(),
832| 'eventType' => 's2298',
833| 'eventName' => 'Reintegração',
834| 'createdAt' => $event->getCreatedAt()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s'),
835| 'status' => $event->getStatus(),
836| ];
837| }
838|
839| // S-2299 - Desligamento
840| $s2299Events = $em->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
841| ->createQueryBuilder('e')
842| ->where('e.esocialTrabalhador = :trabalhador')
843| ->setParameter('trabalhador', $trabalhador)
844| ->getQuery()
845| ->getResult();
846| foreach ($s2299Events as $event) {
847| $events[] = [
848| 'id' => $event->getId(),
849| 'eventType' => 's2299',
850| 'eventName' => 'Desligamento',
851| 'createdAt' => $event->getCreatedAt()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s'),
852| 'status' => $event->getStatus(),
853| ];
854| }
855|
856| // Ordenar eventos por data de criação (mais recente primeiro)
857| usort($events, function ($a, $b) {
858| return strtotime($b['createdAt'] ?? '1970-01-01') - strtotime($a['createdAt'] ?? '1970-01-01');
859| });
860|
861| return [
862| 'trabalhadorId' => $trabalhadorId,
863| 'totalEvents' => count($events),
864| 'events' => $events,
865| ];
866| }
867|
868| /**
869| * Busca timeline completa de eventos relacionados a um trabalhador para formatação no FlowableVariablesService
870| * Inclui datas relevantes de cada evento (dtAdm, dtDeslig, dtIniAfast, etc.) ordenadas cronologicamente
871| *
872| * @param int $trabalhadorId ID do trabalhador (EsocialDadosTrabalhador)
873| * @return array Dados estruturados da timeline de eventos relacionados ao trabalhador
874| */
875| public function getFlowableTimelineForTemplate(int $trabalhadorId): array
876| {
877| $trabalhador = $this->find($trabalhadorId);
878|
879| if (!$trabalhador) {
880| return [];
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 1090, "file_path": "src/Repository/EsocialDadosTrabalhadorRepository.php", "start_line": 1040}
Result
File: src/Repository/EsocialDadosTrabalhadorRepository.php (Total lines: 1111)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1040-1090
1040| // S-2298 - Reintegração
1041| $s2298Events = $em->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2298EvtReintegr::class)
1042| ->createQueryBuilder('e')
1043| ->where('e.esocialTrabalhador = :trabalhador')
1044| ->setParameter('trabalhador', $trabalhador)
1045| ->getQuery()
1046| ->getResult();
1047| foreach ($s2298Events as $event) {
1048| $eventDate = $event->getCreatedAt()?->format('Y-m-d');
1049| $timelineEvents[] = [
1050| 'id' => $event->getId(),
1051| 'eventType' => 's2298',
1052| 'eventName' => 'Reintegração',
1053| 'eventDate' => $eventDate,
1054| 'eventTimestamp' => $event->getCreatedAt()?->getTimestamp() ?? 0,
1055| 'createdAt' => $event->getCreatedAt()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s'),
1056| 'status' => $event->getStatus(),
1057| 'description' => 'Reintegração do trabalhador',
1058| ];
1059| }
1060|
1061| // S-2299 - Desligamento
1062| $s2299Events = $em->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
1063| ->createQueryBuilder('e')
1064| ->where('e.esocialTrabalhador = :trabalhador')
1065| ->setParameter('trabalhador', $trabalhador)
1066| ->getQuery()
1067| ->getResult();
1068| foreach ($s2299Events as $event) {
1069| // Tentar obter dtDeslig do evento se disponível
1070| $eventDate = null;
1071| $eventTimestamp = 0;
1072| if (method_exists($event, 'getInfoDeslig') && $event->getInfoDeslig()) {
1073| $infoDeslig = $event->getInfoDeslig();
1074| if (method_exists($infoDeslig, 'getDtDeslig')) {
1075| $dtDeslig = $infoDeslig->getDtDeslig();
1076| if ($dtDeslig) {
1077| $eventDate = $dtDeslig->format('Y-m-d');
1078| $eventTimestamp = $dtDeslig->getTimestamp();
1079| }
1080| }
1081| }
1082| // Fallback para createdAt se não houver dtDeslig
1083| if (!$eventDate) {
1084| $eventDate = $event->getCreatedAt()?->format('Y-m-d');
1085| $eventTimestamp = $event->getCreatedAt()?->getTimestamp() ?? 0;
1086| }
1087| $timelineEvents[] = [
1088| 'id' => $event->getId(),
1089| 'eventType' => 's2299',
1090| 'eventName' => 'Desligamento',
Request #11
deepseek-v4-flash
P:122.92K C:1.5K CR:121.22K CW:0
13282ms
Reasoning
These don't reveal status sets. The statuses are generic across EsocialEvents (base class holds status). The event status transitions come from handlers: EnviarEventoMessageHandler, EsocialEventBatchResponseRepository (processado/erro), EsocialEventBatchRepository (enviado), EsocialEventsController (EXCLUSAO_SOLICITADA). These apply across event types. So for S-2299, a previously "enviado"/"processado" event is indeed official. A previously "erro no processamento" event means an attempt failed (e.g., validation error) and likely must be fixed & re-sent. In that state, the draft automation won't create a new draft and just tells the responsible there's an official event that can't be edited — though the actual official event may never have been accepted. Given eSocial semantics: a failed S-2299 could be corrected with a new send using indRetif=1 (retificação) only after it was accepted... if rejected, a new event must be re-sent. This means the automation preventing creation of a fresh pending draft when an errored event exists may be acceptable or not, but at minimum the message "S-2299 oficial já existe e não foi alterado" would be misleading for a failed event.
Given uncertainty in the domain's own behavior around error states, I'd report it as a medium with a caveat — actually I'll report as medium: the check treats every non-"pendente" as definitive, including failure/retry states, causing misleading blocking notification. Suggest restricting to definitive statuses (enviado/processado) or differentiating erro to allow regeneration.
Now let me verify the actual current statuses documented for EsocialEvents statuses in the flow: The EsocialEvents base class has constants? Let's check for status constants or docs. Let me quickly search for 'processado' & 'enviado' usage near statuses for esocial events listing, maybe in EsocialController or template. But enough.
Time to be decisive. Findings to report (anchored to added lines):
1. **AutomationExecutionService — god object** (high): New ~240-line orchestration method inside an already 15k-line service mixing resolution/persist/notify. The code itself acknowledges god object in the new service docblock. Suggest extracting orchestration into the dedicated service. Anchor to added method code block.
2. **DraftService findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal date equality filter** (medium): idempotency broken after dismissal date changes; duplicate pending events. Anchor to the added lines in the new file's method.
3. **executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft/event status '!= pendente' blocking** (medium): any non-pendente status treated as official/definitive; states like erro de processamento could dead-end. Anchor added lines in AutomationExecutionService where the status comparisons exist or DraftService's findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal where 'event.status != :pendingStatus'.
Wait, findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal filters status != pendente — which is used to detect existing "official". Same conceptual issue located in DraftService. I'll anchor there.
4. **system_sender spoofing** — decide. Given evidence: the only direct writes are internal (15087) and $config forwarding at 7050/13918 is read from whatever config any action passes to executeNotify. In the flow editor the config is presumably generated server-side based on YAML presets, but actions JSON stored in DB could be altered by clients with more permissions. I couldn't verify. The risk: employees with permission to build automations could set system_sender to send as Adriana. Since automation editing is typically restricted to company admins/ops, and the channel is internal per-company, impact is phishing within same tenant. I consider it a plausible security design concern; maybe report as medium/security with the caveat "se o campo puder ser gravado via config de action". Given precision-over-recall, I'd report but framed carefully, or omit? The review plan explicitly asks to map the origins. Only 3 occurrences in src; all internal. So currently it's not user-writable through any visible path. Since YAML action config presets are server-rendered and only the preset keys go into config, and there's no UI for system_sender, the risk is theoretical unless someone hand-crafts DB config. I'll skip #5 to respect precision (avoid speculative claims) — but wait, existing send_email/notification actions could accept arbitrary config fields if the UI passes through the full JSON stored in 'actions'. Do I know? Not really.
Actually, there's a subtlety: executeNotify passes ALL config to emailConfig including system_sender. The notifications flow is triggered by automation 'notification' action config that a user sets in the flow builder. The flow builder may store entire config object with only known keys. Without evidence of free-form JSON, skip.
5. **Migration down/up orphan accumulation** (low): report.
6. **Migration only seeds currently eligible companies, no follow-up for later contract add-ons** (medium) - the plan lists it; but is there a complement? This is speculative re: product lifecycle. Let me quickly check whether there's any seeding mechanism for flow templates when companies become eligible. Search for something like ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier (found earlier) to see if templates are auto applied when products enabled. If templates are applied when workflows are created for new companies (maybe through ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier), then a new eligible company would get the default template maybe... Let me check ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier for offboarding esocial template? Search 'offboarding' in it, but it's product-agnostic? Might not cover this new seed. Given time, maybe skip #6 since we cannot prove lack of complementary mechanism. Actually there is real risk: the workflow 'fluxo-de-saida' likely pre-exists for a company from other default-flow seeding; companies that get the offboarding product added later, after this migration, will have no seeded template. If ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier is invoked when products are enabled, then the template might be created there. Let's check quickly how other default templates get applied to new companies; check where ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier is called, and search for 'seed_migration' usage elsewhere in src/migrations for template presets.
Let me search for ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier usage and its content regarding template seeding & preset keys.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/", "config/"], "search_text": "ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier"}
Result
File: config/services.yaml
Match lines: 1
1488| - [setProductTemplateDefaultsApplier, ['@App\Service\ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier']]
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystem/FlowAutomationController.php
Match lines: 7
38|use App\Service\ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier;
64| private ?ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier $productTemplateDefaultsApplier = null;
77| ?ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier $productTemplateDefaultsApplier = null,
88| $this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier = $productTemplateDefaultsApplier;
2074| $uniquePerStageTypes = \App\Service\ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier::UNIQUE_PER_STAGE_ACTION_TYPES;
3736| if ($this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier && $productSlug === null) {
3737| $this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier->appendMissingDefaultAutomationsToStatusReport(
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystem/FlowKanbanController.php
Match lines: 8
45|use App\Service\ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier;
75| private ?ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier $productTemplateDefaultsApplier = null;
96| ?ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier $productTemplateDefaultsApplier = null,
116| $this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier = $productTemplateDefaultsApplier;
551| && $this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier instanceof ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier) {
552| $this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier->apply($template);
1260| $pdata['stages'] = ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier::filterDuplicateKanbanProductStages($pdata['stages']);
11140| $stagesList = ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier::filterDuplicateKanbanProductStages(array_values($stagesMap));
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystem/FlowTemplateController.php
Match lines: 13
51|use App\Service\ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier;
92| private ?ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier $productTemplateDefaultsApplier;
121| ?ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier $productTemplateDefaultsApplier = null,
142| $this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier = $productTemplateDefaultsApplier;
250| && $this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier instanceof ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier) {
251| $this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier->apply($template);
258| if ($this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier instanceof ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier) {
259| $this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier->apply($template);
345| $stages = ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier::filterDuplicateKanbanProductStages($stages);
1622| if ($this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier) {
1623| $this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier->apply($template);
3107| if ($needsApplyDefaults && $this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier instanceof ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier) {
3108| $this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier->apply($defaultTemplate);
File: src/Controller/Governance/GovernanceCasesAutomationBuilderController.php
Match lines: 2
42| ?\App\Service\ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier $productTemplateDefaultsApplier = null,
56| $productTemplateDefaultsApplier,
File: src/Controller/SelectionProcessController.php
Match lines: 5
56| private ?\App\Service\ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier $productTemplateDefaultsApplier = null;
67| ?\App\Service\ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier $productTemplateDefaultsApplier = null,
77| $this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier = $productTemplateDefaultsApplier;
1466| if ($this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier) {
1467| $this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier->appendMissingDefaultAutomationsToStatusReport(
File: src/MigrationHelper/CicloInicialEssencialTemplateMaterializer.php
Match lines: 4
11|use App\Service\ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier;
26| private ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier $productTemplateDefaultsApplier,
69| $this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier->apply($template);
95| $this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier->apply($template);
File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowApprovedFlowTemplateMaterializer.php
Match lines: 3
15|use App\Service\ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier;
39| private ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier $productTemplateDefaultsApplier,
129| $this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier->apply($template);
File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowApprovedProcessoSeletivoEnricher.php
Match lines: 3
11|use App\Service\ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier;
22| private ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier $productTemplateDefaultsApplier,
73| $this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier->applyStageBlueprint(
File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowPlanApplierService.php
Match lines: 3
14|use App\Service\ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier;
22| private ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier $productTemplateDefaultsApplier,
134| $this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier->apply($template);
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 4
102| private ?ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier $productTemplateDefaultsApplier = null;
163| * Setter injection para evitar dependência circular com ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier.
165| public function setProductTemplateDefaultsApplier(ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier $applier): void
167| $this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier = $applier;
File: src/Service/CicloInicialService.php
Match lines: 1
109| $defaultsByCategory = ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier::getCycleStageDefaults();
File: src/Service/DecisionSystem/FlowInstanceAutomationsStatusService.php
Match lines: 2
12|use App\Service\ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier;
25| private ?ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier $productTemplateDefaultsApplier = null,
File: src/Service/JornadaMetahumanService.php
Match lines: 4
39| private ?ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier $productTemplateDefaultsApplier = null,
78| if ($this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier) {
79| $this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier->apply($template);
102| $defaultsByCategory = ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier::getCycleStageDefaults();
File: src/Service/ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier.php
Match lines: 1
33|class ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier
File: src/Service/Products/TreinamentosBpmnService.php
Match lines: 1
121| * Used by ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier (defaultAutomations) and ensureInviteStageTrainingCompleteAutomation().
File: src/Service/WorkflowOrchestratorBuiltinStages.php
Match lines: 1
9| * Single source used by FlowTemplateController and ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier.
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["migrations/", "src/"], "search_text": "flow_templates"}
Result
File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php
Match lines: 12
118| // -- flow_templates ---------------------------------------------------
119| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_templates ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS template_category VARCHAR(50) DEFAULT NULL');
120| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_templates ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS settings JSON DEFAULT NULL');
210| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_instances ADD CONSTRAINT FK_FLOW_INSTANCE_TEMPLATE FOREIGN KEY (flow_template_id) REFERENCES flow_templates (id) ON DELETE CASCADE');
616| 'SELECT id FROM flow_templates
635| 'INSERT INTO flow_templates (workflow_id, company_id, name, description, is_active, settings, template_category, created_at, updated_at)
807| 'SELECT ft.id FROM flow_templates ft
886| JOIN flow_templates ft ON ft.id = fi.flow_template_id
1222| 'SELECT id FROM flow_templates
1238| 'INSERT INTO flow_templates (workflow_id, company_id, name, description, is_active, settings, template_category, created_at, updated_at)
1304| 'SELECT id, settings FROM flow_templates
1390| 'UPDATE flow_templates SET settings = :s WHERE id = :id',
File: migrations/Version20260519155647.php
Match lines: 3
40| if (!$schemaManager->tablesExist(['flow_templates'])) {
45| "SELECT id FROM flow_templates
56| $this->addSql('DELETE FROM flow_templates WHERE id IN (' . $idList . ')');
File: migrations/Version20260519173602.php
Match lines: 4
50| 'SELECT id FROM flow_templates
64| 'INSERT INTO flow_templates (workflow_id, company_id, name, description, is_active, settings, template_category, created_at, updated_at)
87| 'SELECT id FROM flow_templates
103| 'DELETE FROM flow_templates WHERE id = :templateId',
File: migrations/Version20260519203024.php
Match lines: 6
11| * Remove workflows legados SSMA (slug ssma-automations-*) e seus flow_templates vinculados.
19| return 'Remove workflows SSMA (ssma-automations-*) e flow_templates vinculados.';
48| FROM flow_templates ft
80| if (!$this->tableExists('flow_templates')) {
176| "DELETE ft FROM flow_templates ft
207| FROM flow_templates ft
File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
Match lines: 8
34| 'flow_templates',
110| if (!$this->tableExists('flow_templates')) {
115| 'SELECT id, settings FROM flow_templates
150| FROM flow_templates ft
155| FROM flow_templates active_ft
170| 'UPDATE flow_templates
215| 'SELECT id FROM flow_templates
234| 'INSERT INTO flow_templates (workflow_id, company_id, name, description, is_active, settings, template_category, created_at, updated_at)
File: src/Command/AdrianaWorkflowRetrievalIndexCommand.php
Match lines: 2
93| $totalTemplates += (int) ($stats['flow_templates'] ?? 0);
98| (int) ($stats['flow_templates'] ?? 0),
File: src/Command/CommunicationCenterAutomationsCommand.php
Match lines: 3
66| LEFT JOIN flow_templates ft
197| LEFT JOIN flow_templates ft
260| LEFT JOIN flow_templates ft
File: src/Controller/CommunicationCenterController.php
Match lines: 1
293| LEFT JOIN flow_templates ft ON ft.id = COALESCE(fa.flow_template_id, fs.flow_template_id)
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
6468| LEFT JOIN flow_templates ft ON ft.id = COALESCE(fa.flow_template_id, fs.flow_template_id)
File: src/Controller/TrmController.php
Match lines: 1
1863| return $this->render('trm/admin/workflow_templates.html.twig', [
File: src/Entity/FlowTemplate.php
Match lines: 1
16| * @ORM\Table(name="flow_templates")
File: src/EventListener/GlobalPermissionListener.php
Match lines: 1
139| 'ssma_flow_templates_' => 'ssma-occurrences',
File: src/MigrationHelper/CicloInicialEssencialTemplateMaterializer.php
Match lines: 1
81| "SELECT id FROM flow_templates
File: src/Service/Adriana/AdrianaContextProviderService.php
Match lines: 1
65| 'workflow_templates' => $this->getWorkflowTemplates($user, $workflowCategory),
File: src/Service/Adriana/AdrianaWorkflowChatService.php
Match lines: 1
278| $workflowTemplates = (array) ($safeContext['workflow_templates'] ?? []);
File: src/Service/Adriana/Retrieval/WorkflowRetrievalIndexService.php
Match lines: 2
162| 'flow_templates' => 0,
178| ++$stats['flow_templates'];
File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowConversationOrchestratorService.php
Match lines: 3
1003| $templates = (array) ($state['safe_context']['workflow_templates'] ?? []);
1653| $templates = (array) ($state['safe_context']['workflow_templates'] ?? []);
3937| $workflowTemplates = (array) ($safeContext['workflow_templates'] ?? []);
File: src/Service/CommunicationCenterAutomationService.php
Match lines: 1
107| LEFT JOIN flow_templates ft
File: src/Service/Governance/CaseAutomation/GovernanceCaseAutomationRuleSyncService.php
Match lines: 1
62| INNER JOIN flow_templates ft ON ft.id = COALESCE(
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceCasesAutomationProvisioner.php
Match lines: 2
113| LEFT JOIN flow_templates ft ON ft.id = COALESCE(fa.flow_template_id, fs.flow_template_id)
324| LEFT JOIN flow_templates ft ON ft.id = COALESCE(fa.flow_template_id, fs.flow_template_id)
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php
Match lines: 2
410| LEFT JOIN flow_templates ft ON ft.id = COALESCE(
1346| LEFT JOIN flow_templates ft ON ft.id = COALESCE(
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaIndicatorImprovementAutomationRunner.php
Match lines: 1
111| LEFT JOIN flow_templates ft ON ft.id = COALESCE(
Request #12
deepseek-v4-flash
P:127.51K C:1.29K CR:124.42K CW:0
11296ms
Reasoning
There's a ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier used when templates are created/applied (e.g., in FlowTemplateController, FlowKanbanController, JornadaMetahumanService). This suggests default automations/templates are appended when building workflows. Let me check what ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier does regarding offboarding and this specific action. If ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier adds default automations to templates per product and includes actions based on YAML config? Let's look at its apply method and whether offboarding default automations come from the YAML config. This matters for migration #6 (new companies). But there may also be a mechanism that when a company adds the offboarding product, a default template is created (from some "default flow template" list). If that default template materialization reads config/automations/offboarding.yaml and builds a stage/automation skeleton, maybe the "offboarding com eSocial S-2299" template isn't included, but maybe the mechanism includes the new action automatically. Search ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier for 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' or for how automations defaults are chosen.
Given time constraints, I should now limit extra investigation. The strongest findings are 1-4 plus maybe 5/6/7 depending on evidence.
Let me evaluate each remaining plan item with evidence available:
- #5 system_sender: The channel broadening is real but only reachable by internal code today. But we should note: users can configure automations; are they constrained? There's FlowAutomationController that stores action JSON built from form. I found ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier uses UNIQUE_PER_STAGE_ACTION_TYPES etc. Not conclusive. I'll skip #5 to avoid speculation? Hmm. Actually there's an important nuance: the change modifies a *generic* notify path used by ALL products (send_email etc.) — the new `system_sender` flag means that if a user-configured automation action (created via the flow editor) ever carries this key (e.g., because the whole `actions` JSON is stored from the client), the responsible/member notifications would be sent in the Adriana channel with userId null — impersonating the system assistant. This is a security-ish concern but depends on whether action configs are free-form. Without a specific front or backend path that persists arbitrary keys, flagging it would violate precision. I will skip it as a finding but can mention in a combined note? No—skip.
- #6 migration eligibility on new companies: The concern may be valid, but given there's ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier that applies default automations when templates created, there might be a complement path. Not proven. The migration is explicitly a seed for *existing eligible companies*. Without evidence that new companies never get it (or that there is a path), I shouldn't claim. I'll skip #6, or report low as "Atenção"? The instructions: favor precision. I'll skip.
- #7 down/up orphan: Verified: down() soft-deactivates template, leaves stages/activities/automations/flow_template_products referencing the template; removes seed_migration from settings. Re-running up() creates a brand-new template and stage rows, duplicating content and leaving orphans. Report as low maintainability/data integrity. Anchored to new lines in migration (down() and ensureTemplate()). Good.
- #3 status check: I'll frame with evidence: generic esocial statuses include 'erro no processamento' set in message handlers, and statuses 'enviado','processado'. Non-pendente is treated as official. Suggest restricting. Medium.
- #4 pending draft duplicate: report.
- #2 type change: skip (likely beneficial). But wait — should I still double check the possibility that callers inside this diff use numeric assignment? The draft service calls `$this->decimalOrNull($payload['percAliment'] ?? null)` returns ?string normalized to "12.50" format, passing to setPercAliment(?string) OK. In the repo `setPercAliment($data['percAliment'] ?? null)`, $data comes from request via CompanyMemberController line 548. If $data['percAliment'] is e.g. int 12 from JSON decode (float for 12.5), then ?string setter receives int → TypeError if CompanyMemberController has strict_types=1. Let me check whether CompanyMemberController has declare(strict_types=1). The file starts `<?php`... let me check quickly. If strict types enabled, this could be a runtime regression introduced by the type change! Actually before the change (?int setter), passing float 12.5 under strict_types would also throw TypeError. Under non-strict, int coerced. Let's check CompanyMemberController's strict_types and data type origin. This could surface a real regression: with JSON request data, percAliment may arrive as float, then setPercAliment(?string) with strict_types=1 throws TypeError on manual save of desligamento (line 548 path). Under the old ?int signature, passing a numeric string from a form would coerce; but if JSON float, old code TypeError too (float to ?int under strict). Hmm.
To keep this manageable: check CompanyMemberController top for declare(strict_types=1) and where $data comes from at ~line 500-560.
Let me read that section.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 15, "file_path": "src/Controller/CompanyMemberController.php", "start_line": 1}
Result
File: src/Controller/CompanyMemberController.php (Total lines: 4410) IS_TRUNCATED: false LINE_RANGE: 1-15 1|<?php 2| 3|declare(strict_types=1); 4| 5|namespace App\Controller; 6| 7|use App\Entity\Assessment360; 8|use App\Entity\Assessment360ExternalEvaluator; 9|use App\Entity\AutoanaliseAssessment360; 10|use App\Entity\Assesement360Question; 11|use App\Entity\Assessment360Answers; 12|use App\Entity\DeiAssessment; 13|use App\Entity\EvaluatedAssessment360; 14|use App\Entity\EvaluatedParesAssessment360; 15|use App\Entity\EvaluatorAssessment360;
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 580, "file_path": "src/Controller/CompanyMemberController.php", "start_line": 470}
Result
File: src/Controller/CompanyMemberController.php (Total lines: 4410)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 470-580
470| }
471|
472| $companyMember = $this->getDoctrine()->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find($data['member']);
473|
474| // if ($this->checkS2200Status($companyMember)) {
475| // $this->logger->error('Evento S2200 ainda não processado');
476| // return new Response('Event S2200 not processed');
477| // }
478|
479| try {
480| $esocialTrabalhador = $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosTrabalhador::class)->saveEsocialTrabalhador($data, $company, $companyMember);
481| $event = $em->getRepository(EsocialS2205EvtAltCadastral::class)->saveEventS2205($esocialTrabalhador, $company, $companyMember);
482| $afterSaveResponse = $this->handleEventAfterSave($event, $data, 'S2205');
483| if ($afterSaveResponse !== null) {
484| return $afterSaveResponse;
485| }
486| } catch (\Exception $e) {
487| $this->logger->error('Error saving event S2205: ' . $e->getMessage());
488| throw $e;
489| }
490|
491| return new Response('Event S2205 saved');
492| }
493|
494| public function saveEventS2206(Request $request): Response
495| {
496| $em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
497| $company = $this->security->getUser()->getCompany();
498|
499| $data = json_decode($request->getContent(), true);
500|
501| if ($data['member'] == null) {
502| $this->logger->error('Company Member ID is null');
503| }
504|
505| $companyMember = $this->getDoctrine()->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find($data['member']);
506|
507| // if ($this->checkS2200Status($companyMember)) {
508| // $this->logger->error('Evento S2200 ainda não processado');
509| // return new Response('Event S2200 not processed');
510| // }
511|
512| try {
513| $esocialTrabalhador = $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosTrabalhador::class)->saveEsocialTrabalhador($data, $company, $companyMember);
514| $event = $em->getRepository(EsocialS2206EvtAltContratual::class)->saveEventS2206($esocialTrabalhador, $company, $companyMember);
515| $afterSaveResponse = $this->handleEventAfterSave($event, $data, 'S2206');
516| if ($afterSaveResponse !== null) {
517| return $afterSaveResponse;
518| }
519| } catch (\Exception $e) {
520| $this->logger->error('Error saving event S2206: ' . $e->getMessage());
521| throw $e;
522| }
523|
524| return new Response('Event S2206 saved');
525| }
526|
527| public function saveEventS2299(Request $request): Response
528| {
529| $em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
530| $company = $this->security->getUser()->getCompany();
531|
532| $data = json_decode($request->getContent(), true);
533|
534| if ($data['member'] == null) {
535| $this->logger->error('Company Member ID is null');
536| }
537|
538| $companyMember = $this->getDoctrine()->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find($data['member']);
539|
540| // if ($this->checkS2200Status($companyMember)) {
541| // $this->logger->error('Evento S2200 ainda não processado');
542| // return new Response('Event S2200 not processed');
543| // }
544|
545| try {
546| $esocialTrabalhador = $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosTrabalhador::class)->findOneBy(['companyMember' => $companyMember]);
547| $remuneracao = $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class)->findByTrabalhador($esocialTrabalhador);
548| $event = $em->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)->saveEventS2299($esocialTrabalhador, $data, $company, $remuneracao);
549| $afterSaveResponse = $this->handleEventAfterSave($event, $data, 'S2299');
550| if ($afterSaveResponse !== null) {
551| return $afterSaveResponse;
552| }
553| } catch (\Exception $e) {
554| $this->logger->error('Error saving event S2299: ' . $e->getMessage());
555| throw $e;
556| }
557|
558| return new Response('Event S2299 saved');
559|
560| }
561|
562| public function saveEventS2230(Request $request): Response
563| {
564| $em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
565| $company = $this->security->getUser()->getCompany();
566|
567| $data = json_decode($request->getContent(), true);
568|
569| if ($data['member'] == null) {
570| $this->logger->error('Company Member ID is null');
571| }
572|
573| $companyMember = $this->getDoctrine()->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find($data['member']);
574|
575| // if ($this->checkS2200Status($companyMember)) {
576| // $this->logger->error('Evento S2200 ainda não processado');
577| // return new Response('Event S2200 not processed');
578| // }
579|
580| try {
Request #13
deepseek-v4-flash
P:130.43K C:6.7K CR:128.77K CW:0
47119ms
Reasoning
CompanyMemberController declares strict_types=1, and $data comes from `json_decode($request->getContent(), true)`. If the client sends numeric JSON for percAliment (e.g., 12.50), json_decode yields float. Under strict_types, calling setPercAliment(float) with ?string would throw TypeError. But also the old code setPercAliment(?int) with float 12.5 under strict_types also TypeError. If client sends "12.50" string (form-like), then both fine (old would coerce? no—with strict_types int setter + numeric string '12.50' throws TypeError too). Under old ?int strict_types, passing '12.50' throws. So behavior for manual save was already limited; the setIndPagtoApi change uses ternary. Actually the code at line 78 (setIndPagtoApi) uses `$data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S':'N'` producing string, fine.
But wait, this PR's saveEventS2299 path: previously `setPercAliment($data['percAliment'] ?? null)` with ?int under strict_types and a numeric string would throw. Did manual saving of desligamento actually work before? Probably the front sends these fields as strings or numbers, and maybe in that path an error could happen with decimals. The PR's own purpose (commit message: "enhance logic for setting IndPagtoApi ... to handle null and empty values correctly" and getter type change to ?string) is a bugfix to make decimal handling work. So it's a fix. Good - not to report.
Let me examine deeper at setPensAlim ($data['pensAlim'] ?? null) — pensAlim remains ?int. If front sends '1' as numeric string under strict_types (controller is strict_types=1 but repository file is NOT strict, so coercion happens in the repository file where setPensAlim is called). The call setPensAlim occurs inside the repository file (no strict_types), so numeric string '1' coerces to int 1 — OK. And setPercAliment(?string) receives whatever the payload is; numeric string fine; float would TypeError but file isn't strict so coercion float→string? Under non-strict mode, passing float to ?string parameter coerces to string (e.g., 12.5→"12.5") - allowed. So with repository (non-strict), setPercAliment(12.5) coerces to "12.5". Good. Old code ?int with 12.5 → coerced to int 12 (loss of data!) — that was a real bug fixed. So this is indeed a beneficial fix.
OK, finalize the set of comments:
1. God-object / orchestration in AutomationExecutionService (high) — anchored at executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft start. This matches user-specified priority #1 for this file.
2. Duplicate pending draft after dismissal date change (medium) — anchored in OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal.
3. Non-pendente treated as official/definitive (medium) — anchored either at AutomationExecutionService line 14992-15000 or DraftService.findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal (status != pendingStatus). I'll anchor on the findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal added lines in the new service.
4. Migration down() does not remove children; re-run after rollback duplicates seed data (low) — anchored in down()/ensureTemplate added code.
Do I also include #5 system_sender? I'll leave out since speculative.
Let me reconsider whether to include the "evento novo notificado com update de metadata eventId" no.
One more possible genuine issue in the new action: after $event created/updated and persisted+flushed, the flowInstanceMember sourceMetadata persisted. But when there is NO esocial data (missing), event null, eventStatus draft_only. That is fine.
Another subtle: `$company->getEsocialMode() === null` - if company esocialMode is set to ''? Probably NULL means disabled.
Also, if the company has esocial mode but there is no eSocial event because the draft is still pending etc.
Alright.
Now let me also reconsider reporting the entity type change (planned issue #2) as non-issue. I'll skip.
Regarding the migration only seeding currently eligible companies (#6) — I think there is value in a low note? The evidence: This kind of "seed to existing eligible companies" is a deliberate pattern mirrored by previous migrations (Version20260518151423 and others also seed existing companies). The description says new customers who enable product later need the template — but the flow 'fluxo-de-saida' probably is materialized per company by product activation flow; not necessarily adding this specific new template. ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier only adds *default automations* to existing templates, not full new flow templates from seed. Since ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier default automations likely derive from YAML files (automations/offboarding.yaml actions), and the new action is now declared in that YAML, it's plausible the applier auto-adds the new automation to templates when default automations get appended for companies that later enable offboarding — BUT this is the same code path that's only invoked when a template is (re)materialized.
Hmm, given all this uncertainty, I think #6 is worth including at low/medium only if we can substantiate. The precise fact we can state: migration seeds only at run-time and only eligible existing companies; no later mechanism within this PR covers companies that become eligible later. That's a fact about the PR. Whether a complement exists outside is uncertain. I'll frame as low "Atenção" maybe? But the tool comments need concrete issues... I'd skip to keep precision, but plan explicitly includes it. Given codebase evidence suggests template creation flows (WorkflowPlanApplierService, WorkflowApprovedFlowTemplateMaterializer) which call ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier, new companies might get default templates through other processes. I will not report #6.
Let me also double-check the seeded action config for 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' action in migration uses 'to' => 'flow_responsible' but actual action ignores 'to' (always sends to resolved responsible). Fine.
One more check — seeded automation for Stage 2: triggerType 'on_all_activities_complete', actionType 'stage_change', with condition type 'on_all_activities_complete' config value 100 and actions [stage_change]. In FlowAutomationController at line 2014 comment: "Etapa 2 com stage_change DEVE usar on_all_activities_complete". So pattern matches. OK.
Also the earlier seed migration inserted flow_automations with flow_stage_id NOT NULL? In Version20260518151423, flow_automations insert includes flow_stage_id and flow_template_id NULL, and the flow_stage_id is NOT NULL in that schema version (they altered to MODIFY flow_stage_id INT DEFAULT NULL at line 146 later in that migration, then existing inserts). Wait, ordering: In Version20260518151423 line 143-146, they ALTER flow_automations ADD ... and MODIFY flow_stage_id INT DEFAULT NULL. That means flow_stage_id can be NULL. Then they insert with stage id and template id NULL. Our migration inserts flow_stage_id = stageId, flow_template_id NULL. Fine.
In Version20260518151423's later seeding (line 1222, 1238, 1304, 1390), there's a second template seeding pattern with settings containing 'seed_migration'? Let me peek quickly at those to compare the down/up reconcile style (how another seed implemented rollback and children deletion). That will strengthen the migration feedback. Actually enough.
Now let me look at git blame is unavailable. Let's produce comments.
But before finalizing, I should double check #4 anchoring precisely: In the new service file, findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal's added lines include:
```
if ($dismissalDate instanceof \DateTimeInterface) {
$queryBuilder
->andWhere('event.dtDeslig = :dismissalDate OR event.dtDeslig IS NULL')
->setParameter('dismissalDate', $dismissalDate->format('Y-m-d'));
}
```
Comment anchored there.
#3 anchor: findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal added lines:
```
->andWhere('event.status != :pendingStatus')
...
->setParameter('pendingStatus', 'pendente')
```
Comment: non-pendente = official. Combined with executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft's eventStatus 'existing_not_editable' message. And the action won't let user fix errored event. Medium.
#1 anchor in AutomationExecutionService executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft method lines added:
```
private function executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
{
```
Comment about orchestration.
#7 migration down anchor lines in the down method. Existing new lines:
```
$this->connection->executeStatement(
'UPDATE flow_templates
SET is_active = 0, settings = :settings, updated_at = NOW()
WHERE id = :templateId',
```
Plus ensureTemplate searching only by seed_migration; after down seed_migration removed so up() would create a new template, duplicating rows. Let me verify the down method unsets seed_migration... Yes: `unset($settings['seed_migration']); $settings['seed_migration_rolled_back'] = self::SEED_KEY;`. So up after down can't find it. And child rows (flow_stages, flow_activities, flow_automations, flow_template_products) remain attached to the old template (not removed by down). The migration comment says up seeds companies "com workflow de saída existente" elegíveis. Actually there's another nuance: ensureOffboardingStages only called for templateId from ensureTemplate (returns new template). So stage rows attach to the new template. OK.
Severity of #7: low.
Wait: Actually one nuance about down() also doesn't remove flow_template_products for the template (only workflow_products deletion is attempted conditionally). So yes children remain.
Given the instruction "comments must address code within review_files", all anchors are in the review files. Good.
Also I might include a finding on the draft service double flush pattern? Not necessary.
Let me also reconsider whether to add a low note about migration `up()` returning early when ANY of the listed tables is missing — since `service_package`/`features` tables may not exist in older deployments; a migration that simply returns is acceptable. Skip.
Now produce comments in pt-BR with required format: start with simple explanation of practical impact, then why it matters, then what to do. Also include severity and category. Provide suggestion_code? Optional. For these comments, suggestion_code is optional; supply where helpful.
Comment 1 content:
"O novo comando de automação entrou como mais um método de orquestração (~250 linhas) dentro de um arquivo que já passa de 15 mil linhas e concentra resolução de responsável, decisão de qual evento usar, persistência, auditoria e notificação — exatamente o tipo de mistura que a própria extração do serviço de rascunho S-2299 pretendia evitar. Na prática, cada nova ação como esta aumenta a chance de regressão cruzada com os outros fluxos (payroll, request notification etc.) e impede que o comportamento de criar/atualizar rascunho seja testado como unidade. Como a PR já criou o serviço OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService com esse propósito, mova a orquestração inteira (busca do evento, atualização de metadata, notificação do responsável) para dentro dele ou para um executor dedicado, deixando o dispatcher do AutomationExecutionService apenas delegando."
Severity high. Category maintainability. Anchor: the method signature added line. For code anchor choose the added lines:
```
private function executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
{
```
Comment 2 (duplicate pending draft date mismatch):
"Um rascunho pendente que já existe para o mesmo colaborador só é reaproveitado quando a data gravada nele é igual à data atual do offboarding ou está vazia; se a data de desligamento mudou desde a criação do rascunho manual, ele não é localizado e a automação cria um segundo S-2299 pendente para o mesmo desligamento. Isso quebra a idempotência declarada na regra da PR (não duplicar evento para o mesmo contexto) e deixa dois rascunhos para o responsável revisar. Ajuste a busca para casar por colaborador/empresa/remuneração ignorando a data — o filtro por data deve servir só para desambiguar múltiplos pendentes, e o valor atual do offboarding já é sobrescrito em applyPayload."
severity medium, category bug.
Anchor in the service method:
```
if ($dismissalDate instanceof \DateTimeInterface) {
$queryBuilder
->andWhere('event.dtDeslig = :dismissalDate OR event.dtDeslig IS NULL')
->setParameter('dismissalDate', $dismissalDate->format('Y-m-d'));
}
```
Comment 3 (status non-pendente = oficial):
"Todo evento que não está 'pendente' é tratado como oficial e não editável, inclusive estados de erro/rejeição em que o S-2299 nunca foi aceito pelo eSocial. Se o envio anterior falhou ('erro no processamento', por exemplo), o offboarding vai apenas notificar que 'já existe evento oficial' e bloquear a criação/atualização do rascunho, deixando o responsável sem caminho para gerar um desligamento correto. Restrinja a trava aos estados realmente definitivos (enviado/processado/validado) e trate erro como rascunho editável, ou explicite na notificação a necessidade de correção manual do evento falho."
severity medium; category bug. Anchor in findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal lines:
```
->andWhere('event.status != :pendingStatus')
```
and lines around. But note anchor must be newly added lines in this new file; they are all new. OK.
Wait—category options: bug, security, performance, maintainability, test, style, documentation, other. Use bug.
Comment 4 (migration down partial):
"O rollback desativa o template mas não apaga as etapas, atividades, automações e vínculos criados, e remove a marca seed_migration do settings. Se a migration for revertida e aplicada de novo (down + up), o up() não encontra o template antigo e cria um segundo template com as mesmas etapas/automações, acumulando linhas órfãs ligadas ao template inativo. Como o seed é idempotente por construção, o down() deveria apagar (ou o up() reconciliar) os registros filhos do template desativado antes de inserir novamente."
severity low; category maintainability. Anchor lines in down():
```
$this->connection->executeStatement(
'UPDATE flow_templates
SET is_active = 0, settings = :settings, updated_at = NOW()
WHERE id = :templateId',
```
Let me now verify my anchors exist verbatim in the diff text (added lines).
From the file content (new files all lines added) yes:
- Down() method added lines in migration include those exact lines.
- Service new file contains those exact lines.
- AutomationExecutionService added lines include the method signature.
For the code_comment tool, existing_code must be consecutive lines existing in diff text of the file with exact format. Since these are new files all content lines start with '+' in the diff. For AutomationExecutionService the method lines were added with + prefix; we must pass text as it appears without + (presumably the diff's text with ' ' is fine; code_comment expects "consecutive lines of code most relevant" present in diff text). Usually we pass the code snippet without +/prefix.
Let me prepare final comments. Also ensure each file reviewed has its own pass:
- config/automations/offboarding.yaml — pass: structure consistent with existing actions; keys correct; no issue.
- config/services.yaml — pass: setter wiring fine.
- migration — comment (#4).
- Entity — pass: type change is aligned with decimal column (no comment).
- Repository — pass: fix ok (no comment). Hmm, setIndPagtoApi change: `isset($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado']) && $data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] !== '' ? (...) : null`. There's a subtle issue: value '0' or false treated as 'N'; a non-empty string like 'N' would be truthy => 'S'. If the form sends the string 'S'/'N', sending 'N' would be inverted to 'S'! Wait: previously the code also did `$data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S':'N'`. If front sends boolean true/false it works. If it sends '1'/'0' or 'S'/'N', then '0' => 'N', '1' => 'S', 'S' => 'S', 'N' => 'S' (wrong). But no change in semantics introduced here except null handling. Since it's pre-existing behavior (only changed from unconditional to conditional), don't flag. Skip.
- AutomationExecutionService — comments (#1, #3 possibly anchor there, #2 anchor elsewhere). #1 comment.
- OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService — #2 & #3.
- tests — pass; not thoroughly verifying; the tests seem decent. Might mention tests don't cover scenario of dismissal-date change for manual draft duplicates (#4) — could fold into #2 comment, not separate.
Wait: I should double check there's an additional real issue: in the "missing worker data" test, executeAction dispatch invoked with type create_esocial_s2299_draft and member; but the notification executes notify with 'to' => 'company_member' and company_member_id set. Yet the YAML says this action "notifica o responsável". OK.
Consider adding #5? I'll skip.
One more: since #2/#4 (findPendingDraft...) is medium and there are also tests asserting "reuses pending draft created outside automation" with the SAME date (2026-09-30), the tests don't cover date divergence; matches finding.
Now, are there potential real functional bugs in the migration's SQL? One: In up(), SQL outer join: `AND (c.service_package_id IS NULL OR (EXISTS sp active AND EXISTS plan_features has_access))`. If a company has a service_package_id pointing to a package that is inactive, the outer OR: c.service_package_id IS NULL? No. Wait: for a company with service_package_id set to an inactive package: `sp.is_active IS NULL OR sp.is_active=1` fails → whole inner OR fails → company excluded. Mirrors spec. OK.
There's a subtle thing: The status filter for sp.is_active on service_package and plan_features check. Fine.
Potential issue: `SELECT w.id, w.company_id ... INNER JOIN company c ON c.id = w.company_id WHERE w.slug = :slug` — In some deployments there might be many workflows with that slug? Slug unique presumably per company. Fine.
Another: down() delete of workflow_products references flow_templates ft to get workflow_id via subquery `SELECT ft.workflow_id FROM flow_templates ft WHERE ft.id = :templateId`. Fine.
Let me also consider: up() calls ensureTemplateProduct for the new template; if a template already exists from previous partial run with is_active 1 and settings seed_migration present, ensureTemplate returns it. OK.
Now: There's a subtle but important issue: up() seeds templates only for workflow slug 'fluxo-de-saida', but requirement: "fluxo padrão offboarding ... apenas em empresas ... com workflow de saída existente". OK.
Alright. Let me also double-check the doc file exists (yes) so no missing-doc comment.
Now compose final answer in pt-BR with 4 comments (1 high, 2 medium, 1 low). Provide code_comment calls.
Wait — need to confirm exact code lines used as anchors for each file as they appear in the diff. For AutomationExecutionService:
Added lines in diff:
```
+ private function executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
+ {
```
Anchor those two lines.
For OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService - new file so all lines added. Anchor for #2:
```
+ if ($dismissalDate instanceof \DateTimeInterface) {
+ $queryBuilder
+ ->andWhere('event.dtDeslig = :dismissalDate OR event.dtDeslig IS NULL')
+ ->setParameter('dismissalDate', $dismissalDate->format('Y-m-d'));
+ }
```
Anchor #3:
```
+ ->andWhere('event.status != :pendingStatus')
```
Single line anchor may work; better include multiple lines for locating the block; but the anchor must be consecutive lines in the file. In the new file lines are:
```
->andWhere('event.dtDeslig = :dismissalDate')
->andWhere('event.status != :pendingStatus')
->setParameter('company', $company)
```
I'll use:
```
->andWhere('event.dtDeslig = :dismissalDate')
->andWhere('event.status != :pendingStatus')
->setParameter('pendingStatus', 'pendente')
```
Check the actual content from the file (from earlier read of the diff new file):
findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal:
```
return $this->entityManager
->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
->createQueryBuilder('event')
->andWhere('event.company = :company')
->andWhere('event.esocialTrabalhador = :esocialTrabalhador')
->andWhere('event.dadosRemuneracao = :remuneracao')
->andWhere('event.dtDeslig = :dismissalDate')
->andWhere('event.status != :pendingStatus')
->setParameter('company', $company)
->setParameter('esocialTrabalhador', $esocialTrabalhador)
->setParameter('remuneracao', $remuneracao)
->setParameter('dismissalDate', $dismissalDate->format('Y-m-d'))
->setParameter('pendingStatus', 'pendente')
```
Anchor lines:
```
->andWhere('event.dtDeslig = :dismissalDate')
->andWhere('event.status != :pendingStatus')
```
Migration anchor for #4 in down():
```
+ $this->connection->executeStatement(
+ 'UPDATE flow_templates
+ SET is_active = 0, settings = :settings, updated_at = NOW()
+ WHERE id = :templateId',
```
Anchor those consecutive lines (3 lines). Diff shows exactly. In the file, line breaks:
```
$this->connection->executeStatement(
'UPDATE flow_templates
SET is_active = 0, settings = :settings, updated_at = NOW()
WHERE id = :templateId',
```
These are consecutive lines. Good.
Now let's also reconsider comment severity for #1 as high. It's a maintainability/architecture finding which user rules instruct to weigh heavily. OK.
Optionally include a low note about tests not covering the date-change duplicate scenario, folded into #2.
Ready to emit code_comment with all four comments and then task_done.
Actually one more careful check about #3 severity and accuracy: We should be careful not to overstate "erro no processamento" is a state where event not accepted. In many batch flows, an event with "erro no processamento" was indeed not accepted. If that event still exists in DB, the responsible sees a failed event, maybe they can re-send it (using retificação?) Actually to re-send a failed event, typically you'd update the same record and resend, not create a new draft. But the offboarding draft path is for creating a *new* draft to review. If an errored event exists with the same data (same trabalhador/remuneracao/date), then generating another draft duplicates. Given ambiguity, the actual defect is the misleading label + blocking on error states. I'll phrase accordingly as medium with suggestion to confirm status semantics; if definitive statuses are only enviado/processado, restrict to those.
I'll proceed.
Analisei todos os arquivos do grupo. Vou registrar os achados confirmados com base no código, começando pelos de maior impacto.
Tool Calls (1)
code_comment
Show Details
Arguments
{"comments": [{"content": "O novo comando de automação entra como mais um método de orquestração de ~250 linhas num arquivo que já passa de 15 mil linhas, misturando resolução do responsável, decisão de qual evento usar, persistência, auditoria no sourceMetadata e notificação via chat/e-mail. É exatamente o tipo de concentração que a própria extração do OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService dizia evitar — ele ficou só com a montagem da entidade, enquanto a regra de negócio do fluxo (qual rascunho reaproveitar, o que notificar, como gravar auditoria) permanece no objeto gigante. Na prática, cada ação nova desse tipo aumenta o risco de regressão cruzada com os demais fluxos do dispatcher (payroll, request_notification etc.) e impede que o comportamento completo seja testado como unidade. Como a PR já criou o serviço dedicado com esse propósito, mova a orquestração inteira para dentro dele (ou para um executor próprio), deixando o dispatcher apenas delegando e interpretando o retorno.", "category": "maintainability", "severity": "high", "existing_code": " private function executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array\n {", "path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"}, {"content": "Um rascunho pendente pré-existente para o mesmo colaborador só é reaproveitado quando a data gravada nele é igual à data atual do offboarding ou está vazia. Se a data de desligamento mudou depois que o rascunho manual foi criado (ou depois de uma execução anterior da automação), o findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal não encontra esse rascunho e o fluxo cria um segundo S-2299 pendente para o mesmo desligamento — exatamente a duplicidade que a regra de idempotência da PR diz evitar, e que os testes não cobrem (todos usam a mesma data). Como a data de desligamento é justamente o campo que applyPayload sobrescreve com a fonte do offboarding, a busca deveria casar por empresa/trabalhador/remuneração sem filtrar por igualdade de data, deixando a data apenas para desambiguar quando houver múltiplos pendentes.", "category": "bug", "severity": "medium", "existing_code": " if ($dismissalDate instanceof \\DateTimeInterface) {\n $queryBuilder\n ->andWhere('event.dtDeslig = :dismissalDate OR event.dtDeslig IS NULL')\n ->setParameter('dismissalDate', $dismissalDate->format('Y-m-d'));\n }", "path": "src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php"}, {"content": "Qualquer evento que não esteja com status 'pendente' é tratado como oficial e não editável, inclusive estados de falha/rejeição em que o S-2299 nunca foi aceito pelo eSocial (o restante do sistema usa, por exemplo, 'erro no processamento', 'enviado' e 'processado' nos handlers de envio). Quando o envio anterior falhou, a etapa final do offboarding vai apenas avisar que \"já existe evento oficial\" e bloquear a criação/atualização do rascunho, deixando o responsável sem caminho para gerar um desligamento correto — a mensagem inclusive induz a erro ao chamar de oficial um evento que falhou. Restrinja a trava aos estados realmente definitivos (enviado/processado/validado) ou trate os estados de erro como caso à parte, permitindo reenviar/corrigir em vez de apenas notificar o bloqueio.", "category": "bug", "severity": "medium", "existing_code": " ->andWhere('event.dtDeslig = :dismissalDate')\n ->andWhere('event.status != :pendingStatus')", "path": "src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php"}, {"content": "O rollback desativa o template e apaga a marca seed_migration do settings, mas não remove as etapas, atividades, automações e vínculos (flow_stages, flow_activities, flow_automations, flow_template_products) criados para ele. Se a migration for revertida e aplicada de novo (down + up), o up() não encontra o template antigo pela chave seed_migration e insere um segundo template com as mesmas etapas/automações, acumulando linhas órfãs ligadas ao template inativo. Como o seed é declaradamente idempotente, o down() deveria apagar os registros filhos do template desativado (ou o up() reconciliar o template inativo/órfão antes de inserir de novo).", "category": "maintainability", "severity": "low", "existing_code": " $this->connection->executeStatement(\n 'UPDATE flow_templates\n SET is_active = 0, settings = :settings, updated_at = NOW()\n WHERE id = :templateId',", "path": "migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php"}]}
Result
(async)
Request #14
deepseek-v4-flash
P:50.45K C:725 CR:43.65K CW:0
6745ms
Reasoning
I've added the four main comments. Let me do a final pass on the remaining files to ensure each was considered and decide whether to add anything else.
Files:
1. config/automations/offboarding.yaml — pass (no issue; test verifies allowed_triggers etc.)
2. config/services.yaml — pass (setter wiring fine)
3. migration — commented (#4 low).
4. Entity — pass (type change aligned w/ decimal column + service).
5. Repository — pass (fix OK).
6. AutomationExecutionService — commented (#1 high).
7. OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService — commented (#2, #3 medium).
8. tests/Config — pass.
9. tests/Service/... — pass.
I might add a short note about the tests not covering the date-divergence scenario for pending drafts (folded into comment #2 already).
Should I add anything else? There's the potential #5 system_sender; I decided to skip given insufficient evidence that config is user-controllable (it appears injected by the action internally only). And #6 seed-only-eligible — skip.
I'm done. Call task_done.
Todos os arquivos do grupo foram revisados individualmente:
- **config/automations/offboarding.yaml** e **config/services.yaml**: sem problemas; a action segue o padrão das demais (chaves corretas, `allowed_triggers`/`blocked_triggers` coerentes com o teste de config, e o wiring do setter no services está consistente).
- **migrations/...**: registrado o problema de `down()` parcial que pode duplicar registros filhos em down+up (low).
- **src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php**: a troca de tipo `?int` → `?string` em `percAliment`/`vrAlim` está coerente com a coluna DECIMAL e com o novo serviço (`decimalOrNull` grava `'12.50'`); não identifiquei quebra de contrato real no diff.
- **src/Repository/...**: ajuste do `indPagtoApi` para tratar ausência/string vazia como `null` preserva o comportamento para `true`/`false` e `'0'`/`'1'`; sem achado.
- **src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php**: registrado o achado de maior peso — orquestração de ~250 linhas adicionada ao god object (high).
- **src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php**: dois achados — casamento por data no reaproveitamento de rascunho manual pode duplicar evento (medium) e tratamento de qualquer status não-“pendente” como oficial não editável (medium).
- **Testes**: cobrem bem criação, atualização preservando campos, reuso de rascunho manual e evento oficial; não cobrem o cenário de divergência de data apontado (mencionado no comentário do serviço).
Os 4 comentários registrados estão ancorados em código novo do diff.
Tool Calls (1)
task_done
Show Details
Arguments
{"state": "DONE"}
Request #15
deepseek-v4-flash
P:42.36K C:4.8K CR:35.84K CW:0
35436ms
Reasoning
Let me analyze the code changes in the review files. I need to review each file carefully and look for issues. Let me start by examining the key files.
Let me go through each file:
1. `config/automations/offboarding.yaml` - Adding a new automation action config. Rules: check spelling errors in yaml-keys.
2. `config/services.yaml` - Adding a setter injection.
3. `migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php` - New migration.
4. `src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php` - Changing type hints from `?int` to `?string` for percAliment and vrAlim.
5. `src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php` - Changing logic of indPagtoApi set.
6. `src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php` - Adding action, system_sender handling, and executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft.
7. `src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php` - New service.
8. Test files.
Confirmed findings already cover some things. I need to find NEW issues.
Let me think about each file.
### Entity change: `getPercAliment(): ?string` and `getVrAlim(): ?string`
The property type changed from `?int` to `?string` in the getters/setters. But we need to check whether the entity's property (the `#[ORM\Column]` mapping) is consistent. Let me look at the entity to check the column definitions and how these values are used elsewhere.
If percAliment and vrAlim are stored as decimal in DB (e.g., as string columns), changing getter/setter to ?string makes sense. But we must check if there are callers relying on int returns. Since the type of these columns might be `decimal(15,2)` or similar, Doctrine would return string. Actually, if the property is typed `?int` but DB returns a string, that could cause TypeError. The change to string may be to align with decimals. But note: if the underlying column type maps to float/int and getters return string... Hmm.
Let me check the entity property declarations to confirm. Also check usages of getPercAliment elsewhere that might do arithmetic expecting int.
### Repository change: IndPagtoApi
```php
$event->setIndPagtoApi(isset($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado']) && $data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] !== '' ? ($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N') : null);
```
Previously: `$event->setIndPagtoApi($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N');`
New behavior handles null/empty → null. This looks reasonable. But what type does setIndPagtoApi accept? Let me check the entity. Actually `setIndPagtoApi` likely accepts ?string. If it expects ?int... but not likely. This is in another file though (entity not in diff). Let me check if setIndPagtoApi accepts null. Need to verify.
Let me now dig deeper using tools. I'll need to read the entity file and other files.
Let me look at the entity to see property mapping for percAliment, vrAlim, indPagtoApi.
Also check the migration for issues:
- In `ensureOffboardingStages`, the automation "Criar Processo Seletivo ao concluir offboarding" triggers on_offboarding_complete action create_processo_seletivo. That's existing functionality.
- In stage 3 automations, there are two automations: order 0 (create_processo_seletivo with on_offboarding_complete), and order 1 (create_esocial_s2299_draft with on_enter).
Wait: the migration seeds automation "Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299) ao entrar na etapa final" with trigger on_enter and action create_esocial_s2299_draft. But the yaml action for create_esocial_s2299_draft says allowed_triggers: only employee_enters_stage. Let's verify "employee_enters_stage" maps to "on_enter". Presumably yes.
In the migration, `triggerType` = 'on_enter'. Good.
But wait — the blocked trigger message/action config: the yaml config says blocked_triggers includes 'exit_date', 'offboarding_completed', etc.
Another thing: In the migration `ensureAutomation` inserts flow_automations with `flow_template_id` NULL and fixed_stage_type NULL. Might be fine.
Now, consider the test file `OffboardingAutomationConfigTest` reads `$config['actions']['movement']`. The yaml diff adds the action into some section. Wait, the diff context shows insertion after "Move o colaborador para a próxima etapa do offboarding." and before "AÇÕES DE VISIBILIDADE E ACESSO". But is the action under a top-level key 'actions' => 'movement'? The test uses `$config['actions']['movement']`. In the YAML we need to verify nesting matches. Let me read the YAML file to see structure.
Let me examine more carefully via tool usage.
Potential issues to identify:
1. In `OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService::decimalOrNull` — percAliment normalization. e.g., '12,50' → normalized '12.50' then number_format((float) '12.50', 2) = '12.50'. OK.
2. In `AutomationExecutionService::executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, event created via createDraftEvent but never persisted before calling buildDraftPayload? Actually flow: if no esocialTrabalhador → missing; else if no remuneracao → missing; else find event; if event existing & status!=='pendente' → existing_not_editable; elseif event existing pendente → updated; else find official event; if found → existing_not_editable; else find pending draft; if found → updated; else create draft event (status created). Then if eventStatus!=='existing_not_editable' → set dados remuneracao, applyPayload, persist.
Potential issue: when eventStatus is 'existing_not_editable' the metadata['eventId'] is set to official event id. Then later it checks `if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento)` and updates metadata eventId = event->getId(). OK.
Now notification: `executeNotify` with to 'company_member', company_member_id responsible->getId(). Need to ensure responsible's user id? They pass company_member_id. Hmm.
3. Review the logic regarding missing data: when missing has 'esocial_worker_data', the `$missing` is populated and notificationTitle becomes 'Dados eSocial pendentes para gerar S-2299'. Good.
But there's a subtle bug: notification message when eventStatus 'updated' vs 'created' is built before the `elseif (!empty($missing))` branch overriding title/message. That's fine.
4. There's a duplicated flush & persist logic for metadata eventId (two flush calls). Not a bug.
5. Consider the `findEventLinkedToOffboarding` uses member sourceMetadata's esocialS2299Draft eventId and offboardingMemberId to find event. Then eventMatchesContext ensures event belongs to the company/worker/remuneração. Good.
6. Potential issue: In `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, when `$esocialTrabalhador` found but remuneração null → missing 'esocial_remuneration_data'. So event not created; but the previous event? If there's already a linked event from metadata, and remuneration is null, we can't fetch event. OK.
But wait, in that same scenario when the worker data is present but remuneration data is missing, the `$event` stays null and no event status set; the code then does metadata update with eventStatus 'draft_only' (initialized). Then notification 'Dados eSocial pendentes' with missing list containing 'esocial_remuneration_data'. OK.
7. Security: HTML injection via reviewUrl? reviewUrl is built from router generate with member id (int). safe. message_html includes reviewButtonHtml with htmlspecialchars on reviewUrl.
8. In `executeNotify`, they set 'message' with '{{member_name}}' placeholders. Where does member_name come from? Need to verify executeNotify resolves member_name placeholder. If it does, fine.
9. Interesting: `resolveEsocialS2299Responsible` looks at config values then flowResponsible then offboarding responsible. It uses CompanyMembers::class repository find, then verifies same company. Good for isolation.
10. Cross-company isolation in migration: only seeds for companies with service_package_id null OR plan_features offboarding has_access=1 AND active service package. Wait, the condition in SQL: company eligible if `c.service_package_id IS NULL` OR (package active AND pf has_access). This mirrors logic described. Hmm, actually mirrors "CompanyAppVisibilityService::hasPackageFeature"? It says: without package → legacy enabled; package inactive → blocked; with package → requires plan_features has_access = 1. In the SQL: `c.service_package_id IS NULL OR (EXISTS active package AND EXISTS plan_features has_access)` — but a package might be referenced with sp.is_active=1 but the company could have a package where plan_features rows don't exist for feature offboarding → then not eligible. But wait, what about package inactive case? If company has package and it is inactive (is_active=0), then EXISTS active package is false → company not eligible. Good.
But subtle: they only insert template for existing workflows with slug 'fluxo-de-saida'. They then create workflow_products linking workflow to offboarding product if not exists — this modifies workflows for companies that already have workflow, adding offboarding product. Hmm, but if company is not eligible to offboarding... they filter by eligibility. OK.
Now potential issue: The migration's `up()` returns early if any table doesn't exist. Since isTransactional false and they check table exists each. Fine.
11. Migration `ensureActivity` uses name 'Offboarding' with activity_type 'activity'. For offboarding products the activity type might need to be 'offboarding_activity' with offboarding_activity_type_id referencing a type entity. Hmm, existing templates might use a specific activity type. Let me not overreach.
12. `Version20260901171000`: In down(), they delete workflow_products only when workflow_product_was_created true. They look at settings decoded from the DB row. But note: When up() runs for a workflow that already has a template seeded (returns existing template id), it doesn't re-ensure; fine.
But if up() inserts template then later down() runs and the settings seed_migration was erased plus seed_migration_rolled_back added, and is_active=0. If up() runs again, `ensureTemplate` queries for templates with settings seed_migration = seed — since down removed seed_migration and set is_active=0, ensureTemplate finds none → creates a NEW template. So after down + up, duplicates with is_active... Actually the first template has is_active=0 but still holds same slug/name/stages etc. Then a new one created active. Not really duplication in active templates but leaves orphan disabled template & stages. That was already partially reported in confirmed finding #1 about not removing stages etc. So don't repeat.
13. Now check the Entity property mapping — important potential issue. Let me read EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php to see the column definitions and other getters/setters.
Let me use tools.
Also need to inspect how percAliment and vrAlim are used elsewhere (with int arithmetic) — search for getPercAliment.
Also search usage for getIndPagtoApi and where percAliment / vrAlim displayed/typed, since changing return type could break callers that treat it as int (e.g., summing into XML). Let me search.
Also check `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository` method where it builds the S2299 XML, perhaps uses these fields.
Let me also verify the AutomationExecutionService constructor signature - in tests they pass many positional args. The fallback in getOffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService instantiates service with entityManager and router. But in the DI config, setOffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService receives router too? Let's read config/services.yaml around AutomationExecutionService to see constructor args and whether router property set. Actually `AutomationExecutionService` uses `$this->router` presumably set via some setter or constructor. Since tests pass router as 9th positional arg, constructor has router param. But DI wiring may not pass router to the draft service unless... In the fallback, it instantiates with `$this->entityManager` and `$this->router`. Wait — in the real flow, the setter-injected service would be constructed by the container with its own router arg (service file config presumably sets constructor args). Need to verify `OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService` constructor: (EntityManagerInterface, ?RouterInterface). The container autowire would inject router if it's a service; router is available. If defined manually we need to check. Not in diff, since service is autoloaded (no service.yaml entry added for OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService). Since it's a new class with autowiring default in Symfony (assuming _defaults), autowire works. The router is nullable so autowire works.
But wait, the fallback instantiates the draft service with only 2 args (entityManager, router). But what about notification/chat logic? The draft service doesn't have those; notification happens in the AutomationExecutionService itself. OK.
Now `AutomationExecutionService` constructor in tests: they pass router as 9th positional parameter. Let me read the constructor signature to check that router property is named such.
Let's read the top of the file around constructor.
Let me search the file for `__construct` and properties.
Potential bug: The new action's code always ends with a flush; also it sends chat with 'system_sender' true. The test asserts that for a member with sourceType offboarding, and responsible... fine.
Now potential bug in repository: `setIndPagtoApi` entity method expects ?string? If entity getter/setter now typed differently... Let's check the entity's property types in the file.
Let me actually read relevant entity.
Let me look at the full entity file around the fields.
I'll use file_read for src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php.
Also examine yaml file structure top-level to check 'actions' => 'movement' nesting used by test. Wait: test reads `$config['actions']['movement']`. But yaml file diff shows insert in a place that belongs to which block? Need to see context lines: "has_config: false" and description "Move o colaborador para a próxima etapa do offboarding." preceding, then added action, then "# AÇÕES DE VISIBILIDADE E ACESSO". Actually maybe the file structure is like:
```
actions:
movement:
...
- id: ...
```
Let me read the YAML to confirm indentation and structure.
Let's start reading files.
Additionally, consider tests: the big test file constructs `AutomationExecutionService` with arguments; if constructor signature changed... it's not changed in the diff. But the newly added positional arg null,null,null,null then router. Wait in the test `new AutomationExecutionService($em, new MockHttpClient(), null, new NullLogger(), null, null, null, null, $this->router())`. That's 9 args: entityManager, httpClient, mailer, logger, ?, ?, ?, ?, router. If in reality router is a setter-injected property, not constructor, then passing it as 9th positional arg wouldn't map correctly, and $this->router would be null → buildReviewUrl fallback path used anyway. But the real service needs router for generate URL. In the test, the router mock returns '/my-company/member/10'. If the 9th positional arg is not the router, then router property stays null, and reviewUrl fallback '/my-company/member/10?esocialTab=desligamento' returns exactly that path, so test would pass anyway (same as fallback!). Interesting: In `OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService::buildReviewUrl`, fallback path uses `'/my-company/member/' . $companyMember->getId()`. And router mock returns the same '/my-company/member/10'. So test can't distinguish. So the draft service passed to executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft comes from fallback instantiation `new OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService($this->entityManager, $this->router)` where $this->router is the service property (must be set by constructor). If the 9th positional arg maps to the router then fine.
Let me verify the constructor to confirm positional args: Need to read constructor. If the router is not a constructor parameter, test's 9th arg would be wrong but since they pass 'null' for it... Actually the last arg is `$this->router()`. If constructor has 9 parameters and 9th is router, mapping correct.
Let me read.
Another potential issue: In `AutomationExecutionService::executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, after creating a draft via createDraftEvent (no id yet), they set metadata eventId null initially and then persist member & flush, then if event instanceof ... set eventId. Since event was persisted before eventId metadata flush, event->getId() will now be set (post-flush) if DB autoincrement. In test they assign id at persist callback. In real flow, event persisted via em->persist then flush; then getId returns generated id. Then metadata updated with eventId and second flush. Wait — actually event persist + member persist in same flush (first flush). Then they re-read metadata; event->getId() available now. So OK.
But there's a subtlety: `findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal` etc. createQueryBuilder returns query with getOneOrNullResult. In production, `event.dadosRemuneracao = :remuneracao` - data exists. fine.
Potential issue: duplicate notification each time the member enters a stage? The action is triggered only on entering stage 3 (on_enter) - presumably only once. But if the automation re-executes each time? Not our concern.
Now let me examine the actual date comparisons: buildDraftPayload dataDesligamento from offboardingMember->getDismissalDate(). But offboarding dismissal date may not equal stage-final; fine.
Potential bug: In `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, if `$esocialTrabalhador` is present but `$remuneracao` missing → missing includes 'esocial_remuneration_data'. Then no event update. But if there was an existing event (e.g., previously created draft) still 'pendente' — findEventLinkedToOffboarding would only be called when remuneracao found. So when remuneration removed (unlikely), event won't be updated but draft metadata retained. Not important.
Now think about entity property mapping change: If the DB column for percAliment/vrAlim is a decimal with Doctrine mapped to float (e.g., type "decimal" returns string). Actually changing getter to string is about the PHP type. If the property has native type `?string` but column type decimal? Let's read entity.
Let me read the file.
Also need to verify the migration seeds `offboarding_activity_type_id` null etc. Check `flow_stages` columns: they insert product_slot_index NULL. But if the workflow is multi-product, stages may require product_slot_index? They set null explicitly to match single product? The query for ensureStage requires product_slot_index IS NULL. If existing stages created by the app for a single-product flow have product_slot_index set to 0 perhaps? Let's check other seeds/templates to see conventions. This could lead to stage duplication on re-run? Actually migration only inserts if not found with product_slot_index IS NULL and same name. If re-run, won't duplicate. If existing flow created by app has stage product_slot_index = 0 (not null), the seed inserts a new stage row with null and same name → duplicate names in template. But rerun guarded by seed_migration flag in ensureTemplate returning existing templateId; but then ensureOffboardingStages still executes for each stage regardless; if a previous partial failure inserted stages without the template? Hmm not likely.
Wait, re-read up(): For each workflowRow: `ensureTemplate` returns existing template id if template with seed exists (from earlier run). But if template exists from earlier run, then it proceeds to ensureOffboardingStages. ensureStage queries for matching stage name with product_slot_index IS NULL, returns existing. Fine.
Now the stage insert: column `product_slot_index` set NULL. But maybe other templates use slot_index 0 for single product. The ensureStage SELECT checks product_slot_index IS NULL and name; matches only rows the migration itself inserted. So re-run idempotent for its own rows.
But `flow_stages` may include `stage_category` column; they insert NULL explicitly for stage_category/phase_number.
OK let me read files to check details.
I'll first read the entity file and repository and service files in parallel.
Let me start.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php"}
Result
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php (Total lines: 335)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-335
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Entity;
4|
5|use App\Repository\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository;
6|use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
7|
8|/**
9| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass=EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::class)
10| */
11|class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento extends EsocialEvents
12|{
13| /**
14| * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="EsocialDadosTrabalhador")
15| * @ORM\JoinColumn(name="esocial_dados_trabalhador_id", referencedColumnName="id", nullable=false)
16| */
17| private $esocialTrabalhador;
18|
19| /**
20| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=2, nullable=true)
21| */
22| private $mtvDeslig;
23|
24| /**
25| * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
26| */
27| private $dtDeslig;
28|
29| /**
30| * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
31| */
32| private $dtAvPrv;
33|
34| /**
35| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=1, nullable=true)
36| */
37| private $indPagtoApi;
38|
39| /**
40| * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
41| */
42| private $dtProjFimApi;
43|
44| /**
45| * @ORM\Column(type="integer", nullable=true)
46| */
47| private $pensAlim;
48|
49| /**
50| * @ORM\Column(type="decimal", precision=10, scale=2, nullable=true)
51| */
52| private $percAliment;
53|
54| /**
55| * @ORM\Column(type="decimal", precision=10, scale=2, nullable=true)
56| */
57| private $vrAlim;
58|
59| /**
60| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=20, nullable=true)
61| */
62| private $nrProcTrab;
63|
64| /**
65| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=1, nullable=true)
66| */
67| private $indPdv;
68|
69| /**
70| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=11, nullable=true)
71| */
72| private $cpfSubstituto;
73|
74| /**
75| * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
76| */
77| private $dtNascto;
78|
79| /**
80| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=11, nullable=true)
81| */
82| private $novoCpf;
83|
84| /**
85| * @ORM\Column(type="integer", nullable=true)
86| */
87| private $indRemun;
88|
89| /**
90| * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
91| */
92| private $dtFimRemun;
93|
94| /**
95| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=5, nullable=true)
96| */
97| private $insConsig;
98|
99| /**
100| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=40, nullable=true)
101| */
102| private $nrContr;
103|
104| /**
105| * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity=EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class, )
106| * @ORM\JoinColumn(nullable=false)
107| */
108| private $dadosRemuneracao;
109|
110| public function getDadosRemuneracao(): ?EsocialDadosRemuneracao
111| {
112| return $this->dadosRemuneracao;
113| }
114|
115| public function setDadosRemuneracao(?EsocialDadosRemuneracao $dadosRemuneracao): self
116| {
117| $this->dadosRemuneracao = $dadosRemuneracao;
118|
119| return $this;
120| }
121|
122| public function getEsocialTrabalhador()
123| {
124| return $this->esocialTrabalhador;
125| }
126|
127| public function setEsocialTrabalhador(?EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador): void
128| {
129| $this->esocialTrabalhador = $esocialTrabalhador;
130| }
131|
132| public function getMtvDeslig(): ?string
133| {
134| return $this->mtvDeslig;
135| }
136|
137| public function setMtvDeslig(?string $mtvDeslig): self
138| {
139| $this->mtvDeslig = $mtvDeslig;
140|
141| return $this;
142| }
143|
144| public function getDtDeslig(): ?\DateTimeInterface
145| {
146| return $this->dtDeslig;
147| }
148|
149| public function setDtDeslig(?\DateTimeInterface $dtDeslig): self
150| {
151| $this->dtDeslig = $dtDeslig;
152|
153| return $this;
154| }
155|
156| public function getDtAvPrv(): ?\DateTimeInterface
157| {
158| return $this->dtAvPrv;
159| }
160|
161| public function setDtAvPrv(?\DateTimeInterface $dtAvPrv): self
162| {
163| $this->dtAvPrv = $dtAvPrv;
164|
165| return $this;
166| }
167|
168| public function getIndPagtoApi(): ?string
169| {
170| return $this->indPagtoApi;
171| }
172|
173| public function setIndPagtoApi(?string $indPagtoApi): self
174| {
175| $this->indPagtoApi = $indPagtoApi;
176|
177| return $this;
178| }
179|
180| public function getDtProjFimApi(): ?\DateTimeInterface
181| {
182| return $this->dtProjFimApi;
183| }
184|
185| public function setDtProjFimApi(?\DateTimeInterface $dtProjFimApi): self
186| {
187| $this->dtProjFimApi = $dtProjFimApi;
188|
189| return $this;
190| }
191|
192| public function getPensAlim(): ?int
193| {
194| return $this->pensAlim;
195| }
196|
197| public function setPensAlim(?int $pensAlim): self
198| {
199| $this->pensAlim = $pensAlim;
200|
201| return $this;
202| }
203|
204| public function getPercAliment(): ?string
205| {
206| return $this->percAliment;
207| }
208|
209| public function setPercAliment(?string $percAliment): self
210| {
211| $this->percAliment = $percAliment;
212|
213| return $this;
214| }
215|
216| public function getVrAlim(): ?string
217| {
218| return $this->vrAlim;
219| }
220|
221| public function setVrAlim(?string $vrAlim): self
222| {
223| $this->vrAlim = $vrAlim;
224|
225| return $this;
226| }
227|
228| public function getNrProcTrab(): ?string
229| {
230| return $this->nrProcTrab;
231| }
232|
233| public function setNrProcTrab(?string $nrProcTrab): self
234| {
235| $this->nrProcTrab = $nrProcTrab;
236|
237| return $this;
238| }
239|
240| public function getIndPdv(): ?string
241| {
242| return $this->indPdv;
243| }
244|
245| public function setIndPdv(?string $indPdv): self
246| {
247| $this->indPdv = $indPdv;
248|
249| return $this;
250| }
251|
252| public function getCpfSubstituto(): ?string
253| {
254| return $this->cpfSubstituto;
255| }
256|
257| public function setCpfSubstituto(?string $cpfSubstituto): self
258| {
259| $this->cpfSubstituto = $cpfSubstituto;
260|
261| return $this;
262| }
263|
264| public function getDtNascto(): ?\DateTimeInterface
265| {
266| return $this->dtNascto;
267| }
268|
269| public function setDtNascto(?\DateTimeInterface $dtNascto): self
270| {
271| $this->dtNascto = $dtNascto;
272|
273| return $this;
274| }
275|
276| public function getNovoCpf(): ?string
277| {
278| return $this->novoCpf;
279| }
280|
281| public function setNovoCpf(?string $novoCpf): self
282| {
283| $this->novoCpf = $novoCpf;
284|
285| return $this;
286| }
287|
288| public function getIndRemun(): ?int
289| {
290| return $this->indRemun;
291| }
292|
293| public function setIndRemun(?int $indRemun): self
294| {
295| $this->indRemun = $indRemun;
296|
297| return $this;
298| }
299|
300| public function getDtFimRemun(): ?\DateTimeInterface
301| {
302| return $this->dtFimRemun;
303| }
304|
305| public function setDtFimRemun(?\DateTimeInterface $dtFimRemun): self
306| {
307| $this->dtFimRemun = $dtFimRemun;
308|
309| return $this;
310| }
311|
312| public function getInsConsig(): ?string
313| {
314| return $this->insConsig;
315| }
316|
317| public function setInsConsig(?string $insConsig): self
318| {
319| $this->insConsig = $insConsig;
320|
321| return $this;
322| }
323|
324| public function getNrContr(): ?string
325| {
326| return $this->nrContr;
327| }
328|
329| public function setNrContr(?string $nrContr): self
330| {
331| $this->nrContr = $nrContr;
332|
333| return $this;
334| }
335|}
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php"}
Result
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php (Total lines: 296)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-296
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Repository;
4|
5|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
6|use Doctrine\Bundle\DoctrineBundle\Repository\ServiceEntityRepository;
7|use Doctrine\ORM\OptimisticLockException;
8|use Doctrine\ORM\ORMException;
9|use Doctrine\Persistence\ManagerRegistry;
10|
11|/**
12| * @extends ServiceEntityRepository<EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento>
13| *
14| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento|null find($id, $lockMode = null, $lockVersion = null)
15| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento|null findOneBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null)
16| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[] findAll()
17| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[] findBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null, $limit = null, $offset = null)
18| */
19|class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository extends ServiceEntityRepository
20|{
21| public function __construct(ManagerRegistry $registry)
22| {
23| parent::__construct($registry, EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class);
24| }
25|
26| /**
27| * @throws ORMException
28| * @throws OptimisticLockException
29| */
30| public function add(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $entity, bool $flush = true): void
31| {
32| $this->_em->persist($entity);
33| if ($flush) {
34| $this->_em->flush();
35| }
36| }
37|
38| /**
39| * @throws ORMException
40| * @throws OptimisticLockException
41| */
42| public function remove(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $entity, bool $flush = true): void
43| {
44| $this->_em->remove($entity);
45| if ($flush) {
46| $this->_em->flush();
47| }
48| }
49|
50| function sanitizeCNPJ($cnpj) {
51| return preg_replace('/\D/', '', $cnpj);
52| }
53|
54| function sanitizeCPF($cpf) {
55| return preg_replace('/\D/', '', $cpf);
56| }
57|
58| private function buildDateOrNull(?string $date): ?\DateTime
59| {
60| return !empty($date) ? new \DateTime($date) : null;
61| }
62|
63| public function saveEventS2299($esocialDadosTrabalhador, $data, $company, $dadosRemuneracao): EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
64| {
65| $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
66| $event->setModo( 'INC');
67| $event->setCompany($company);
68| $event->setTpAmb($company->getEsocialMode() ?? '2');
69| $event->setTpInscTransmissor(1);
70| $event->setNrInscTransmissor($this->sanitizeCNPJ($company->getCnpj()));
71| $event->setEsocialTrabalhador($esocialDadosTrabalhador);
72| $event->setIndRetif(1);
73| $event->setStatus('pendente');
74| $event->setCreatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
75| $event->setMtvDeslig($data['motivoDesligamento'] ?? null);
76| $event->setDtDeslig($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataDesligamento']) ?? null);
77| $event->setDtAvPrv($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataConcessaoAviso']) ?? null);
78| $event->setIndPagtoApi(isset($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado']) && $data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] !== '' ? ($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N') : null);
79| $event->setDtProjFimApi($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataTerminoAviso']) ?? null);
80| $event->setPensAlim($data['pensAlim'] ?? null);
81| $event->setPercAliment($data['percAliment'] ?? null);
82| $event->setVrAlim($data['vrAlim'] ?? null);
83| $event->setNrProcTrab($data['numeroProcesso'] ?? null);
84| $event->setIndPdv($data['indPdv'] ?? null);
85| $event->setCpfSubstituto($this->sanitizeCPF($data['cpfSubstituto']) ?? null);
86| $event->setDtNascto($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataNascimentoTitular']) ?? null);
87| $event->setNovoCpf($this->sanitizeCPF($data['novoCpfTrabalhador']) ?? null);
88| $event->setIndRemun($data['indRemun'] ?? null);
89| $event->setDtFimRemun($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dtFimRemun']) ?? null);
90| $event->setInsConsig($data['matriculaInstituicao'] ?? null);
91| $event->setNrContr($data['numeroContrato'] ?? null);
92| $event->setDadosRemuneracao($dadosRemuneracao);
93|
94| $this->add($event);
95|
96| return $event;
97| }
98|
99| /**
100| * Extrai todos os dados do evento S-2299 para formatação no FlowableVariablesService
101| *
102| * @param int $eventId ID do evento (EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento)
103| * @return array|null Dados estruturados do evento e relacionamentos, ou null se não encontrado
104| */
105| public function getFlowableDataForTemplate(int $eventId): ?array
106| {
107| $event = $this->find($eventId);
108|
109| if (!$event) {
110| return null;
111| }
112|
113| // Extrair dados principais do evento
114| $data = [
115| 'id' => $event->getId(),
116| 'mtvDeslig' => $event->getMtvDeslig(),
117| 'dtDeslig' => $event->getDtDeslig()?->format('Y-m-d'),
118| 'dtAvPrv' => $event->getDtAvPrv()?->format('Y-m-d'),
119| 'indPagtoApi' => $event->getIndPagtoApi(),
120| 'dtProjFimApi' => $event->getDtProjFimApi()?->format('Y-m-d'),
121| 'pensAlim' => $event->getPensAlim(),
122| 'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),
123| 'vrAlim' => $event->getVrAlim(),
124| 'nrProcTrab' => $event->getNrProcTrab(),
125| 'indPdv' => $event->getIndPdv(),
126| 'cpfSubstituto' => $event->getCpfSubstituto(),
127| 'dtNascto' => $event->getDtNascto()?->format('Y-m-d'),
128| 'novoCpf' => $event->getNovoCpf(),
129| 'indRemun' => $event->getIndRemun(),
130| 'dtFimRemun' => $event->getDtFimRemun()?->format('Y-m-d'),
131| 'insConsig' => $event->getInsConsig(),
132| 'nrContr' => $event->getNrContr(),
133| ];
134|
135| // Extrair dados da classe pai (EsocialEvents)
136| $data['modo'] = $event->getModo();
137| $data['tpAmb'] = $event->getTpAmb();
138| $data['uniqueEventId'] = $event->getUniqueEventId();
139| $data['tpInscTransmissor'] = $event->getTpInscTransmissor();
140| $data['nrInscTransmissor'] = $event->getNrInscTransmissor();
141| $data['iniValid'] = $event->getIniValid();
142| $data['fimValid'] = $event->getFimValid();
143| $data['indRetif'] = $event->getIndRetif();
144| $data['indApuracao'] = $event->getIndApuracao();
145| $data['perApur'] = $event->getPerApur()?->format('Y-m-d');
146| $data['indGuia'] = $event->getIndGuia();
147| $data['status'] = $event->getStatus();
148| $data['createdAt'] = $event->getCreatedAt()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s');
149| $data['updatedAt'] = $event->getUpdatedAt()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s');
150|
151| // Extrair dados da empresa
152| $company = $event->getCompany();
153| if ($company) {
154| $data['company'] = [
155| 'id' => $company->getId(),
156| 'name' => $company->getName(),
157| 'code' => $company->getCode(),
158| 'cnpj' => $company->getCnpj(),
159| ];
160| } else {
161| $data['company'] = null;
162| }
163|
164| // Extrair dados do trabalhador eSocial relacionado
165| $esocialTrabalhador = $event->getEsocialTrabalhador();
166| if ($esocialTrabalhador) {
167| $dadosTrabalhador = $esocialTrabalhador->getDadosTrabalhador();
168| $endereco = $esocialTrabalhador->getEndereco();
169|
170| $data['esocialTrabalhador'] = [
171| 'id' => $esocialTrabalhador->getId(),
172| 'isTrabalhadorSemVinculo' => $esocialTrabalhador->getIsTrabalhadorSemVinculo(),
173| 'dadosTrabalhador' => $dadosTrabalhador ? [
174| 'cpfTrab' => $dadosTrabalhador->getCpfTrab(),
175| 'nmTrab' => $dadosTrabalhador->getNmTrab(),
176| 'sexo' => $dadosTrabalhador->getSexo(),
177| 'racaCor' => $dadosTrabalhador->getRacaCor(),
178| 'estCiv' => $dadosTrabalhador->getEstCiv(),
179| 'grauInstr' => $dadosTrabalhador->getGrauInstr(),
180| 'nmSoc' => $dadosTrabalhador->getNmSoc(),
181| 'dtNascto' => $dadosTrabalhador->getDtNascto()?->format('Y-m-d'),
182| 'paisNascto' => $dadosTrabalhador->getPaisNascto(),
183| 'paisNac' => $dadosTrabalhador->getPaisNac(),
184| 'fonePrinc' => $dadosTrabalhador->getFonePrinc(),
185| 'emailPrinc' => $dadosTrabalhador->getEmailPrinc(),
186| 'dtAltDadosPessoais' => $dadosTrabalhador->getDtAltDadosPessoais()?->format('Y-m-d'),
187| ] : null,
188| 'endereco' => $endereco ? [
189| 'brasil' => $endereco->getBrasil() ? [
190| 'tpLograd' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getTpLograd(),
191| 'dscLograd' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getDscLograd(),
192| 'nrLograd' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getNrLograd(),
193| 'complemento' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getComplemento(),
194| 'bairro' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getBairro(),
195| 'cep' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getCep(),
196| 'codMunic' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getCodMunic(),
197| 'uf' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getUf(),
198| ] : null,
199| 'exterior' => $endereco->getExterior() ? [
200| 'paisResid' => $endereco->getExterior()->getPaisResid(),
201| 'dscLograd' => $endereco->getExterior()->getDscLograd(),
202| 'nrLograd' => $endereco->getExterior()->getNrLograd(),
203| 'complemento' => $endereco->getExterior()->getComplemento(),
204| 'bairro' => $endereco->getExterior()->getBairro(),
205| 'nmCid' => $endereco->getExterior()->getNmCid(),
206| 'codPostal' => $endereco->getExterior()->getCodPostal(),
207| ] : null,
208| ] : null,
209| ];
210| } else {
211| $data['esocialTrabalhador'] = null;
212| }
213|
214| // Extrair dados de remuneração (EsocialDadosRemuneracao)
215| $dadosRemuneracao = $event->getDadosRemuneracao();
216| if ($dadosRemuneracao) {
217| $data['dadosRemuneracao'] = [
218| 'id' => $dadosRemuneracao->getId(),
219| 'indMv' => $dadosRemuneracao->getIndMv(),
220| 'tpInscRemunOutrEmpr' => $dadosRemuneracao->getTpInscRemunOutrEmpr(),
221| 'nmTrab' => $dadosRemuneracao->getNmTrab(),
222| 'dtNascto' => $dadosRemuneracao->getDtNascto()?->format('Y-m-d'),
223| 'tpInscSucessaoVinc' => $dadosRemuneracao->getTpInscSucessaoVinc(),
224| 'nrInscSucessaoVinc' => $dadosRemuneracao->getNrInscSucessaoVinc(),
225| 'matricAnt' => $dadosRemuneracao->getMatricAnt(),
226| 'dtAdm' => $dadosRemuneracao->getDtAdm()?->format('Y-m-d'),
227| 'procJudTrab' => $dadosRemuneracao->getProcJudTrab(),
228| 'infoTerm' => $dadosRemuneracao->getInfoTerm(),
229| ];
230| } else {
231| $data['dadosRemuneracao'] = null;
232| }
233|
234| // Extrair dados do batch se existir
235| $batch = $event->getBatch();
236| if ($batch) {
237| $data['batch'] = [
238| 'id' => $batch->getId(),
239| 'cdResposta' => $batch->getCdResposta(),
240| 'descResposta' => $batch->getDescResposta(),
241| 'protocoloEnvio' => $batch->getProtocoloEnvio(),
242| 'dhRecepcao' => $batch->getDhRecepcao()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s'),
243| ];
244| } else {
245| $data['batch'] = null;
246| }
247|
248| // Extrair dados da resposta se existir
249| $response = $event->getResponse();
250| if ($response) {
251| $data['response'] = [
252| 'id' => $response->getId(),
253| 'tpAmb' => $response->getTpAmb(),
254| 'cdResposta' => $response->getCdResposta(),
255| 'descResposta' => $response->getDescResposta(),
256| 'nrRecibo' => $response->getNrRecibo(),
257| 'dhProcessamento' => $response->getDhProcessamento()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s'),
258| 'ocorrencias' => $response->getOcorrencias(),
259| ];
260| } else {
261| $data['response'] = null;
262| }
263|
264| return $data;
265| }
266|
267| // /**
268| // * @return EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[] Returns an array of EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento objects
269| // */
270| /*
271| public function findByExampleField($value)
272| {
273| return $this->createQueryBuilder('e')
274| ->andWhere('e.exampleField = :val')
275| ->setParameter('val', $value)
276| ->orderBy('e.id', 'ASC')
277| ->setMaxResults(10)
278| ->getQuery()
279| ->getResult()
280| ;
281| }
282| */
283|
284| /*
285| public function findOneBySomeField($value): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
286| {
287| return $this->createQueryBuilder('e')
288| ->andWhere('e.exampleField = :val')
289| ->setParameter('val', $value)
290| ->getQuery()
291| ->getOneOrNullResult()
292| ;
293| }
294| */
295|}
296|
Request #16
deepseek-v4-flash
P:54.27K C:876 CR:47.1K CW:0
6595ms
Reasoning
Key observations:
1. Entity `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` properties are untyped (`private $percAliment;` etc.). The getters were changed from `?int` to `?string`. The underlying columns are decimal(10,2). Previously, with Doctrine decimal type, the DBAL would return strings on hydration, so getter typed `?int` would raise TypeError when a non-null decimal value is read from DB (if native property type is untyped, then the getter's declared return type ?int doesn't force conversion; returning an int-typed value from an untyped property is fine only if the underlying value is int. Doctrine hydrates decimal columns as string, e.g., "12.50", so a getter returning `?int` when property holds "12.50" string would throw TypeError in PHP 7+ strict. So changing to string is a bug fix.
But wait — this is a type change of public getters/setters. Callers that use `getPercAliment()` expecting int for arithmetic would now get string. Need to check callers elsewhere that might treat the result as int (e.g., formatting "12.50" etc.). Since DB returns decimal, likely places already convert. Let me search for getPercAliment and getVrAlim usages.
2. In the repository `saveEventS2299`, `setPercAliment($data['percAliment'] ?? null)` and `setVrAlim($data['vrAlim'] ?? null)` — if the data is numeric string like "12.50", setter now expects ?string, fine.
But `saveEventS2299` does `$this->add($event)` which flushes. Note that it doesn't set updatedAt.
3. Note `sanitizeCPF($data['cpfSubstituto']) ?? null` — if data['cpfSubstituto'] is missing → sanitizeCPF(null) → preg_replace with null coerced to ''; returns ''. So not null. Fine (unchanged).
Now, this PR's repository change is about handling empty string for indPagtoApi. With entity setter ?string.
Let me check other callers of setIndPagtoApi across the codebase to see if there are int values being passed that would now break. Actually the setter still accepts ?string; the change is entity signature didn't change there. Wait: check the code path where previously repository did `$event->setIndPagtoApi($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N')`. If `avisoPrevioIndenizado` is empty string '' or '0', old code returns 'N'. The new logic returns null for '' — but '0' is falsy and would return 'N'. Actually '0' !== '' so returns 'N'. So for value "0" → 'N'. For '' → null. That is the intent: "handle null and empty values correctly". OK.
Now let's search the codebase for usage of these methods to spot callers where ?int → ?string could break (e.g., comparisons with ints). Search getPercAliment, getVrAlim, getIndPagtoApi.
Also let me verify the `pensAlim` mapping as integer; `intOrNull` used for pensAlim; while data from config could be '1' string? In test config pensAlim '1'. intOrNull converts to int 1. Good.
Now the twig template change (member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig) is in other changed files not in review group. Not to comment.
Let me search callers.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "getPercAliment"}
Result
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
Match lines: 1
204| public function getPercAliment(): ?string
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino.php
Match lines: 1
112| public function getPercAliment(): ?int
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
122| 'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2399EvtTsvTerminoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
109| 'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),
File: src/Service/ESocialDataService.php
Match lines: 2
1078| $std->percaliment = $evento->getPercAliment();
1330| $std->percaliment = $evento->getPercAliment();
File: src/Service/FlowableServices/FlowableVariablesService.php
Match lines: 2
19737| 'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),
19792| 'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),
File: src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php
Match lines: 1
69| $this->applyPayloadValue(fn () => $event->getPercAliment(), fn ($value) => $event->setPercAliment($value), $this->decimalOrNull($payload['percAliment'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
File: tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php
Match lines: 1
188| self::assertSame('12.50', $event->getPercAliment());
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "getVrAlim"}
Result
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php Match lines: 1 216| public function getVrAlim(): ?string File: src/Entity/EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino.php Match lines: 1 124| public function getVrAlim(): ?int File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php Match lines: 1 123| 'vrAlim' => $event->getVrAlim(), File: src/Repository/EsocialS2399EvtTsvTerminoRepository.php Match lines: 1 110| 'vrAlim' => $event->getVrAlim(), File: src/Service/ESocialDataService.php Match lines: 2 1079| $std->vralim = $evento->getVrAlim(); 1331| $std->vralim = $evento->getVrAlim(); File: src/Service/FlowableServices/FlowableVariablesService.php Match lines: 2 19738| 'vrAlim' => $event->getVrAlim(), 19793| 'vrAlim' => $event->getVrAlim(), File: src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php Match lines: 1 70| $this->applyPayloadValue(fn () => $event->getVrAlim(), fn ($value) => $event->setVrAlim($value), $this->decimalOrNull($payload['vrAlim'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
Request #17
deepseek-v4-flash
P:55.96K C:763 CR:55.04K CW:0
6425ms
Reasoning
The entity type change from `?int` to `?string` for percAliment/vrAlim. Note that EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino still has `?int` and DB column decimal, but this isn't in scope. Actually wait — the Entity file still has `?int` for S2399, but they didn't change it. That is another file (out of scope).
The S2299 change to ?string aligns with decimal columns. But now need to consider callers: `ESocialDataService.php` uses `$std->percaliment = $evento->getPercAliment();` (S2299 event). Previously when property value "12.50" string from DB, getter typed ?int would fail? But actually property is untyped. Return type ?int when returning string "12.50" → PHP TypeError. Wait, before this PR, how did the system ever load the entity from DB with a non-null percAliment without error? Unless previously value always null... Maybe existing bug. This change fixes it.
Let me check ESocialDataService for usage - how it builds XML; they set percaliment as string; in XML building, may need numeric with 2 decimals. If they format, string like "12.50" is fine.
Let me look at ESocialDataService context to see how $std->percaliment is consumed, and whether type coercion creates issues (e.g., floats with comma). Might not be a blocker.
Now let's look at setIndPagtoApi callers and how `$data` comes in. Not in scope.
Now important: the repository's `saveEventS2299` now does `setPensAlim($data['pensAlim'] ?? null)`. The entity `pensAlim` is typed integer in setter `?int`. If data['pensAlim'] is a numeric string like "1", passing to `setPensAlim(?int)` with strict_types? The repository file has no declare(strict_types=1). So "1" coerced to int 1. Fine.
Wait — actually does repository have declare strict? Top of file shows no declare. So coercion happens.
Now, in the new Offboarding service, `applyPayload` calls `setPensAlim` with `$this->intOrNull(...)` returning int|null; fine.
OK let me now read the yaml to verify structure/keys for the new action and check config location, plus confirm `config_preset.to: flow_responsible`.
And check `AutomationExecutionService` around the new method, e.g., executeNotify signature, system_sender handling in template building, and where the message templates resolve `{{member_name}}`. Also verify executeNotify supports message_html, and how member_name is replaced. Let me read around lines 13900-13960 and other areas.
Let me also check services.yaml context near setOffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService and AutomationExecutionService definition.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read_diff
Show Details
Arguments
{"path_array": ["config/automations/offboarding.yaml"]}
Result
==== FILE: config/automations/offboarding.yaml ====
diff --git a/config/automations/offboarding.yaml b/config/automations/offboarding.yaml
--- a/config/automations/offboarding.yaml
+++ b/config/automations/offboarding.yaml
@@ -179,6 +179,27 @@ actions:
has_config: false
description: "Move o colaborador para a próxima etapa do offboarding."
+ - id: "create_esocial_s2299_draft"
+ type: "create_esocial_s2299_draft"
+ title: "Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299)"
+ icon: "fa-solid fa-file-lines"
+ has_config: false
+ allowed_triggers:
+ - "employee_enters_stage"
+ blocked_triggers:
+ - "offboarding_completed"
+ - "exit_date"
+ - "deadline_reached"
+ - "all_activities_completed"
+ - "all_activities_completed_plus_days"
+ - "any_activity_completed"
+ - "days_in_stage"
+ - "days_after_offboarding_start"
+ blocked_trigger_message: "Esta ação só pode ser usada com o trigger 'Colaborador entrar nesta etapa'"
+ description: "Cria ou atualiza o rascunho do evento S-2299 com dados do offboarding e notifica o responsável para revisar o desligamento eSocial."
+ config_preset:
+ to: "flow_responsible"
+
# ---------------------------------------------------------
# AÇÕES DE VISIBILIDADE E ACESSO
# ---------------------------------------------------------
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "config/automations/offboarding.yaml", "start_line": 1, "end_line": 80}
Result
File: config/automations/offboarding.yaml (Total lines: 481)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-80
1|# Configuração de Automações - Offboarding
2|# Este arquivo define triggers, actions e regras específicos para desligamento de colaboradores
3|
4|product:
5| id: 3
6| name: "Offboarding"
7| slug: "offboarding"
8| entity_name: "Colaborador"
9| entity_name_plural: "Colaboradores"
10|
11|# Triggers (Condições) disponíveis
12|triggers:
13| notifications:
14| - id: "deadline_reached"
15| type: "on_timeout"
16| title: "Prazo desta etapa ser atingido"
17| icon: "fa-solid fa-clock"
18| has_config: false
19|
20| - id: "exit_date"
21| type: "on_exit_date"
22| title: "Data de desligamento chegar"
23| icon: "fa-solid fa-calendar-xmark"
24| has_config: false
25|
26| - id: "any_activity_completed"
27| type: "on_any_activity_complete"
28| title: "Qualquer atividade da etapa ser concluída"
29| icon: "fa-solid fa-tasks"
30| has_config: false
31|
32| - id: "employee_enters_stage"
33| type: "on_enter"
34| title: "Colaborador entrar nesta etapa"
35| icon: "fa-solid fa-arrow-right-to-bracket"
36| has_config: false
37|
38| movement:
39| - id: "all_activities_completed"
40| type: "on_all_activities_complete"
41| title: "Colaborador finalizar X% das atividades da etapa"
42| icon: "fa-solid fa-check-double"
43| has_config: true
44| config_type: "percentage_activities"
45| config_label: "Porcentagem mínima de atividades concluídas"
46| config_options:
47| # Opções geradas dinamicamente no front com base em stageActivitiesCount (25%, 50%, 75%, 100% para 4 atividades, etc.)
48| dynamic_from_stage: true
49|
50| - id: "all_activities_completed_plus_days"
51| type: "on_all_activities_complete_plus_days"
52| title: "Colaborador finalizar todas as atividades da etapa e passar X dias"
53| icon: "fa-solid fa-calendar-check"
54| has_config: true
55| config_type: "dropdown"
56| config_label: "Número de dias após conclusão"
57| config_options:
58| - { id: "1", label: "1 dia" }
59| - { id: "2", label: "2 dias" }
60| - { id: "3", label: "3 dias" }
61| - { id: "5", label: "5 dias" }
62| - { id: "7", label: "7 dias" }
63| - { id: "14", label: "14 dias" }
64| - { id: "30", label: "30 dias" }
65|
66| - id: "offboarding_completed"
67| type: "on_offboarding_complete"
68| title: "Colaborador concluir o offboarding (última etapa)"
69| icon: "fa-solid fa-flag-checkered"
70| has_config: false
71|
72| - id: "days_after_offboarding_start"
73| type: "on_days_after_start"
74| title: "X dias após o início do offboarding"
75| icon: "fa-solid fa-calendar-days"
76| has_config: true
77| config_type: "dropdown"
78| config_label: "Número de dias após início"
79| config_options:
80| - { id: "1", label: "1 dia" }
Request #18
deepseek-v4-flash
P:58.09K C:145 CR:56.7K CW:0
1719ms
Reasoning
Now let me view the YAML around line 140-210 to see the 'actions' section structure. The diff context lines are "has_config: false" "description: Move o colaborador..." which is the previous action under actions presumably. Let me read lines 100-210.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 220, "file_path": "config/automations/offboarding.yaml", "start_line": 100}
Result
File: config/automations/offboarding.yaml (Total lines: 481)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 100-220
100| - { id: "3", label: "3 dias" }
101| - { id: "5", label: "5 dias" }
102| - { id: "7", label: "7 dias" }
103| - { id: "14", label: "14 dias" }
104| - { id: "30", label: "30 dias" }
105|
106|# Actions (Ações) disponíveis
107|actions:
108| notifications:
109| # ---------------------------------------------------------
110| # NOTIFICAÇÕES INTERNAS (Chat/Sistema)
111| # ---------------------------------------------------------
112|
113| # 1. Notificar colaborador
114| - id: "notify_employee"
115| type: "notification"
116| title: "Notificar colaborador"
117| icon: "fa-solid fa-bell"
118| has_config: false
119| config_preset:
120| to: "employee"
121|
122| # 2. Notificar responsável do fluxo
123| - id: "notify_flow_responsible"
124| type: "notification"
125| title: "Notificar responsável do fluxo"
126| icon: "fa-solid fa-user-check"
127| has_config: false
128| config_preset:
129| to: "flow_responsible"
130|
131| # 2.1 Notificar preenchimento eSocial (somente se empresa tiver eSocial habilitado)
132| - id: "notify_esocial_worker_data"
133| type: "notify_esocial_worker_data"
134| title: "Notificar preenchimento de dados do trabalhador e remuneração (eSocial)"
135| icon: "fa-solid fa-id-card-clip"
136| has_config: false
137| config_preset:
138| to: "flow_responsible"
139|
140| # ---------------------------------------------------------
141| # ENVIO DE E-MAILS (SMTP)
142| # Template determinado automaticamente baseado em: trigger + destinatário
143| # Ex: offboarding-on_all_activities_complete-employee
144| # ---------------------------------------------------------
145|
146| # 3. Enviar e-mail para colaborador
147| - id: "send_email_employee"
148| type: "send_email"
149| title: "Enviar e-mail para colaborador"
150| icon: "fa-solid fa-envelope"
151| has_config: false
152| config_preset:
153| to: "employee"
154|
155| # 4. Enviar e-mail para responsável do fluxo
156| - id: "send_email_flow_responsible"
157| type: "send_email"
158| title: "Enviar e-mail para responsável do fluxo"
159| icon: "fa-solid fa-user-gear"
160| has_config: false
161| config_preset:
162| to: "flow_responsible"
163|
164| # ---------------------------------------------------------
165| # NOTIFICAÇÕES ADICIONAIS
166| # ---------------------------------------------------------
167|
168| - id: "send_whatsapp"
169| type: "send_whatsapp"
170| title: "Enviar WhatsApp para colaborador"
171| icon: "fa-brands fa-whatsapp"
172| has_config: false
173|
174| movement:
175| - id: "move_to_next_stage"
176| type: "stage_change"
177| title: "Mover para a próxima etapa"
178| icon: "fa-solid fa-arrow-right"
179| has_config: false
180| description: "Move o colaborador para a próxima etapa do offboarding."
181|
182| - id: "create_esocial_s2299_draft"
183| type: "create_esocial_s2299_draft"
184| title: "Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299)"
185| icon: "fa-solid fa-file-lines"
186| has_config: false
187| allowed_triggers:
188| - "employee_enters_stage"
189| blocked_triggers:
190| - "offboarding_completed"
191| - "exit_date"
192| - "deadline_reached"
193| - "all_activities_completed"
194| - "all_activities_completed_plus_days"
195| - "any_activity_completed"
196| - "days_in_stage"
197| - "days_after_offboarding_start"
198| blocked_trigger_message: "Esta ação só pode ser usada com o trigger 'Colaborador entrar nesta etapa'"
199| description: "Cria ou atualiza o rascunho do evento S-2299 com dados do offboarding e notifica o responsável para revisar o desligamento eSocial."
200| config_preset:
201| to: "flow_responsible"
202|
203| # ---------------------------------------------------------
204| # AÇÕES DE VISIBILIDADE E ACESSO
205| # ---------------------------------------------------------
206|
207| visibility:
208| # Ação disponível APENAS na primeira etapa (ou Etapa Intermediária em flows variáveis)
209| # Usada com trigger on_enter
210| - id: "delay_offboarding_visibility"
211| type: "delay_offboarding_visibility"
212| title: "Aguardar X dias para exibir offboarding ao colaborador"
213| icon: "fa-solid fa-eye-slash"
214| has_config: true
215| config_type: "dropdown"
216| config_label: "Dias para aguardar antes de exibir o offboarding"
217| allowed_triggers:
218| - "employee_enters_stage"
219| blocked_triggers:
220| - "offboarding_completed"
Request #19
deepseek-v4-flash
P:59.66K C:476 CR:58.11K CW:0
3956ms
Reasoning
The YAML structure: `actions` -> `movement` list includes `move_to_next_stage` then new action `create_esocial_s2299_draft`. Note: after adding create_esocial_s2299_draft to the movement list, then `visibility:` begins at line 207. The indentation at line 203 `# -----` comment with two-space indent, but visibility at line 207 has two-space indent as a key of actions. Wait, the comment at line 203-205 is indented 2 spaces which would be under actions as a block? In YAML comments are ignored, so it doesn't matter. Then `visibility:` at line 207 with 2 spaces → sibling of movement. Good. The added action belongs to `actions.movement` list. The test reads `$config['actions']['movement']` — OK matches.
Check key spelling: "allowed_triggers", "blocked_triggers", "blocked_trigger_message", "config_preset", "has_config", "description", "icon", "title", "id", "type". Others in file use same keys. Looks fine.
Note: the new action has `blocked_triggers` listing triggers not in the yaml triggers list (e.g., days_in_stage?) Fine.
YAML check ok.
Now, let's look deeper at the OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService - it says "Comportamento movido verbatim de AutomationExecutionService para não introduzir regressões." Hmm, that comment implies logic was moved from somewhere. But the confirmed findings already captured issues there.
Let me look at AutomationExecutionService constructor and router property and how the service is instantiated in tests (they pass $this->router() as arg 9). Let me read the constructor region of the file.
Let me find `public function __construct` in AutomationExecutionService.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "public function __construct", "file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"]}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 1 117| public function __construct(
Request #20
deepseek-v4-flash
P:60.17K C:88 CR:60.03K CW:0
1369ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 240, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 115}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15387)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 115-240
115| private array $flowableAuth = ['rest-admin', 'test'];
116|
117| public function __construct(
118| EntityManagerInterface $entityManager,
119| HttpClientInterface $httpClient,
120| ?MailerInterface $mailer = null,
121| ?LoggerInterface $logger = null,
122| ?CompanySenderGenerator $companySenderGenerator = null,
123| ?TwigEnvironment $twig = null,
124| ?OffboardingToRecruitmentService $offboardingToRecruitment = null,
125| ?MemberPermissionService $memberPermissionService = null,
126| ?RouterInterface $router = null,
127| ?NpsBpmnService $npsBpmnService = null,
128| ?CrmAutomationService $crmAutomationService = null,
129| ?NpsInviteSendService $npsInviteSendService = null,
130| ?NpsSurveyEquivalentRecoveryApplier $npsSurveyEquivalentRecoveryApplier = null,
131| ?CicloInicialService $cicloInicialService = null,
132| ?MessageBusInterface $messageBus = null
133| ) {
134| $this->entityManager = $entityManager;
135| $this->httpClient = $httpClient;
136| $this->mailer = $mailer;
137| $this->logger = $logger;
138| $this->companySenderGenerator = $companySenderGenerator;
139| $this->twig = $twig;
140| $this->offboardingToRecruitment = $offboardingToRecruitment;
141| $this->memberPermissionService = $memberPermissionService;
142| $this->router = $router;
143| $this->npsBpmnService = $npsBpmnService;
144| $this->crmAutomationService = $crmAutomationService;
145| $this->npsInviteSendService = $npsInviteSendService;
146| $this->pesquisaEstruturalBpmnService = null;
147| $this->pulseSurveyBpmnService = null;
148| $this->assessment360BpmnService = null;
149| $this->npsSurveyEquivalentRecoveryApplier = $npsSurveyEquivalentRecoveryApplier;
150| $this->cicloInicialService = $cicloInicialService;
151| $this->messageBus = $messageBus;
152| }
153|
154| /**
155| * Setter injection para evitar dependência circular de construtor com FlowStageEventListener.
156| */
157| public function setFlowStageEventListener(\App\EventListener\FlowStageEventListener $flowStageEventListener): void
158| {
159| $this->flowStageEventListener = $flowStageEventListener;
160| }
161|
162| /**
163| * Setter injection para evitar dependência circular com ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier.
164| */
165| public function setProductTemplateDefaultsApplier(ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier $applier): void
166| {
167| $this->productTemplateDefaultsApplier = $applier;
168| }
169|
170| /**
171| * Setter injection para evitar dependência circular com JornadaMetahumanService.
172| */
173| public function setJornadaMetahumanService(JornadaMetahumanService $service): void
174| {
175| $this->jornadaMetahumanService = $service;
176| }
177|
178| /**
179| * Evita dependência circular no construtor (FlowStageEventListener → AutomationExecutionService).
180| */
181| public function setCycleOrchestratorMemberTransitionService(CycleOrchestratorMemberTransitionService $service): void
182| {
183| $this->cycleOrchestratorMemberTransition = $service;
184| }
185|
186| /**
187| * Setter injection para evitar dependência circular com PesquisaEstruturalBpmnService.
188| */
189| public function setPesquisaEstruturalBpmnService(PesquisaEstruturalBpmnService $service): void
190| {
191| $this->pesquisaEstruturalBpmnService = $service;
192| }
193|
194| /**
195| * Setter injection para evitar dependência circular com PulseSurveyBpmnService.
196| */
197| public function setPulseSurveyBpmnService(PulseSurveyBpmnService $service): void
198| {
199| $this->pulseSurveyBpmnService = $service;
200| }
201|
202| /**
203| * Setter injection para evitar dependência circular com Assessment360BpmnService.
204| */
205| public function setAssessment360BpmnService(Assessment360BpmnService $service): void
206| {
207| $this->assessment360BpmnService = $service;
208| }
209|
210| /**
211| * Setter injection para a ponte BPMN ↔ Central de Comunicação.
212| */
213| public function setBpmnCommunicationCenterBridge(BpmnCommunicationCenterBridge $bridge): void
214| {
215| $this->bpmnCcBridge = $bridge;
216| }
217|
218| public function setNotificationsCenterService(?NotificationsCenterService $notificationsCenterService): void
219| {
220| $this->notificationsCenterService = $notificationsCenterService;
221| }
222|
223| public function setFinancialFlowAutomationExecutor(FinancialFlowAutomationExecutor $executor): void
224| {
225| $this->financialFlowAutomationExecutor = $executor;
226| }
227|
228| public function setOffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService(\App\Service\Offboarding\OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService $service): void
229| {
230| $this->offboardingEsocialS2299DraftService = $service;
231| }
232|
233| /**
234| * Executa todas as ações de uma automação para um membro específico
235| */
236| public function executeAutomation(FlowAutomation $automation, ?FlowInstanceMember $member = null, array $context = []): array
237| {
238| $results = [];
239| $actions = $automation->getActions();
240|
Request #21
deepseek-v4-flash
P:61.77K C:1.14K CR:60.16K CW:0
8743ms
Reasoning
Constructor: router is the 9th positional parameter. In tests, they pass `$this->router()` at 9th position (args: em, MockHttpClient, mailer(null/...), NullLogger, null, null, null, null, router). Actually in `testCreateEsocialDraftStoresAuditMetadataWhenWorkerDataIsMissing`: args are ($em, MockHttpClient, null, NullLogger, null, null, null, null, $router). Count: 1 em, 2 httpClient, 3 null(mailer), 4 NullLogger, 5 null, 6 null, 7 null, 8 null, 9 router. Yes router at position 9. Great.
Now, check the DI wiring: config/services.yaml setter injection setOffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService referencing service `App\Service\Offboarding\OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService`. This new service is autowired with constructor (EntityManagerInterface, ?RouterInterface). Autowire works.
But is `OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService` actually autowirable given it's under App\Service\Offboarding namespace and services.yaml default autowire? presumably yes for App\ namespace.
Now consider a potential issue: `setOffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService` is called in services.yaml under the definition of App\Service\AutomationExecutionService (where constructor injected with services). But `AutomationExecutionService` might also be instantiated in places outside the container (as fallback indicates). That's handled.
Now examine `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` more closely for bugs. In particular:
- `$eventStatus = 'draft_only';` initial. When remuneracao present but no event exists at all... Actually path: if not esocialTrabalhador → missing worker data. else remuneracao... else create event etc. But if remuneracao present, then findEventLinked... etc. If no official event, no pending, create draft event, status 'created'. `$event` non-null. So 'draft_only' occurs only when esocialTrabalhador is missing or remuneration missing. In that case event stays null. The later notification logic: if eventStatus != existing_not_editable but event null → message "Rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado..." Wait, check flow:
```
$notificationTitle = 'Revisar desligamento eSocial (S-2299)';
$notificationMessage = $eventStatus === 'updated' ? '...atualizado...' : '...criado...';
```
Then if eventStatus === existing_not_editable... elseif !empty($missing) → override with 'Dados eSocial pendentes...'.
So when missing is non-empty, notification overridden. When missing is empty but eventStatus is 'draft_only'? Can that happen? draft_only occurs only when missing non-empty (worker data or remuneration missing). Actually missing set only in those two branches. If worker data missing → missing contains 'esocial_worker_data'. If worker found but remuneration missing → missing 'esocial_remuneration_data'. So draft_only always accompanied by missing non-empty → notification overridden. Good.
If event created/updated → notification 'Revisar desligamento...' plus reviewButtonHtml (link). Good.
One issue: notification message HTML building includes the review button always (message_html . reviewButtonHtml), even when the notification is about missing data or official event existing. Let's look:
```
$notification = $this->executeNotify([
...
'message_html' => $notificationMessageHtml . $reviewButtonHtml,
...
]);
```
If missing data → title 'Dados eSocial pendentes...', message_html '...Complete os dados e abra o chat...' plus reviewButtonHtml link to member manage page tab desligamento. That's acceptable, since user may go to fill data in the desligamento tab.
Now, does `{{member_name}}` placeholder get replaced by executeNotify? Need to check that executeNotify performs replacement; if the responsible member (not the offboarding employee) is recipient, the template may replace with recipient's name, not the employee. Need to examine executeNotify placeholder resolution and member context.
Let's read executeNotify and resolveMessageVariables or similar in AutomationExecutionService.
Also examine the chat message path: For offboarding the notification code earlier with $config to employee. Search for how member_name is derived — likely from `$member` context passed: context['member_id'] set to companyMember->getId() (the employee). Let's find function.
Let me search for 'member_name' replacement and '{{member_name}}'.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "member_name"}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 20
2550| // notifyConfig com {{member_name}} literal porque a ponte lia message/title sem replace).
2663| $hasRecordPlaceholder = str_contains($message, '{{member_name}}') || str_contains($message, '{{record_name}}');
2667| // Step 1 — inject {{member_name}} right after "O registro" when missing.
2669| $message = preg_replace('/\bO registro\b(?!\s*\{\{)/u', 'O registro {{member_name}}', $message, 1) ?: $message;
6170| 'member_name' => '',
6283| $values['member_name'] = $fullName;
6920| $message = 'O colaborador {{member_name}} precisa ter os dados de trabalhador e remuneração preenchidos para o eSocial.';
6921| $messageHtml = '<p>O colaborador {{member_name}} precisa ter os dados de trabalhador e remuneração preenchidos para o eSocial.</p>';
6984| // config['title'] here, placeholders like {{member_name}} inside the automation title stay literal.
13329| '{{member_name}}' => '',
13374| $contextRecordName = trim((string) ($context['record_name'] ?? $context['member_name'] ?? ''));
13380| $replacements['{{member_name}}'] = $fullName;
15055| ? 'O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi atualizado com a data de desligamento atual do offboarding. Os demais campos já preenchidos foram preservados. Abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar os detalhes.'
15056| : 'O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding. Abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar os detalhes.';
15058| ? '<p>O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi atualizado com a data de desligamento atual do offboarding.</p><p>Os demais campos já preenchidos foram preservados; revise-os antes de enviar.</p>'
15059| : '<p>O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding.</p>';
15064| $notificationMessage = 'Já existe um evento S-2299 oficial para {{member_name}} e ele não pode ser editado pelo offboarding. Abra o chat com a Adriana para conferir a situação antes de seguir.';
15065| $notificationMessageHtml = '<p>Já existe um evento S-2299 oficial para {{member_name}} e ele não pode ser editado pelo offboarding.</p><p>Confira a situação no chat com a Adriana antes de seguir.</p>';
15077| $notificationMessage = 'O S-2299 de {{member_name}} ainda não foi criado porque faltam ' . $missingDescription . '. Complete os dados e abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar.';
15078| $notificationMessageHtml = '<p>O S-2299 de {{member_name}} ainda não foi criado porque faltam ' . $missingDescription . '.</p><p>Complete os dados e abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar.</p>';
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "function executeNotify"}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 2 6902| private function executeNotifyEsocialWorkerData(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array 6936| private function executeNotify(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
Request #22
deepseek-v4-flash
P:63.76K C:141 CR:62.85K CW:0
2154ms
Reasoning
Let me read executeNotify function (line 6936 onward) to understand the flow and see how message/message_html placeholders get replaced and how member_name is resolved. Also see how the chat message is built and how system_sender path works.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 7080, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 6936}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15387)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 6936-7080
6936| private function executeNotify(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
6937| {
6938| $recipients = $config['recipients'] ?? [];
6939| $recipientType = $config['to'] ?? $config['recipient'] ?? null;
6940| $title = $config['title'] ?? $config['subject'] ?? null;
6941| $message = $config['message'] ?? $config['body'] ?? null;
6942| $messageHtml = $config['message_html'] ?? null;
6943| $type = $config['type'] ?? 'info';
6944| $templateSlug = $config['template'] ?? null;
6945|
6946| // Se recipients está vazio mas há 'to' ou 'recipient', usar como recipient único
6947| if (empty($recipients) && $recipientType) {
6948| $recipients = [$recipientType];
6949| }
6950|
6951| // Fallback: se não há destinatários definidos, enviar para responsável do fluxo
6952| if (empty($recipients)) {
6953| error_log("[NOTIFY] ⚠️ Nenhum destinatário definido (to/recipient/recipients vazios) - usando fallback 'flow_responsible'");
6954| $recipientType = 'flow_responsible';
6955| $recipients = ['flow_responsible'];
6956| }
6957|
6958| // 🎯 GERAR MENSAGEM AUTOMÁTICA se não foi fornecida
6959| if (empty($title) || empty($message)) {
6960| $autoMessage = $this->generateAutoNotificationMessage($member, $recipientType, $context);
6961| $title = $title ?: $autoMessage['title'];
6962| $message = $message ?: $autoMessage['message'];
6963| }
6964|
6965| $title = $this->replaceVariables($title, $member, $context);
6966| $message = $this->replaceVariables($message, $member, $context);
6967| if ($messageHtml !== null && $messageHtml !== '') {
6968| $messageHtml = $this->replaceVariables($messageHtml, $member, $context);
6969| } else {
6970| $messageHtml = null;
6971| }
6972|
6973| $emailTemplateBody = ($messageHtml !== null && $messageHtml !== '') ? $messageHtml : $message;
6974|
6975| $createdNotifications = [];
6976| $emailsSent = [];
6977| $chatMessagesSent = [];
6978|
6979| foreach ($recipients as $recipientType) {
6980| // Merge context with action config so recipient resolvers can reuse action-specific keys.
6981| // Example: manager_permission_products, role_id, company_member_id.
6982| // title/subject must be the already-replaced strings: CompanySenderGenerator renders
6983| // the DB template subject as Twig (e.g. "{{ title }} – {{ companyName }}"). If we keep
6984| // config['title'] here, placeholders like {{member_name}} inside the automation title stay literal.
6985| $recipientContext = array_merge($context, $config, [
6986| 'message' => $emailTemplateBody,
6987| 'body' => $emailTemplateBody,
6988| 'title' => $title,
6989| 'subject' => $title,
6990| ]);
6991| $users = $this->resolveRecipients($recipientType, $member, $recipientContext);
6992|
6993| foreach ($users as $user) {
6994| // 1️⃣ NOTIFICAÇÃO IN-APP (badge/popup)
6995| try {
6996| $notification = new \App\Entity\NotificationSpecialist();
6997| $notification->setUser($user);
6998| $notification->setTitle($title);
6999| $notification->setMessage($message);
7000| $notification->setIsRead(false);
7001| $notification->setCreatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
7002|
7003| $this->entityManager->persist($notification);
7004| $createdNotifications[] = $user->getId();
7005|
7006| if ($this->notificationsCenterService instanceof NotificationsCenterService) {
7007| $notificationType = \App\Entity\NotificationsCenter::TYPE_REQUEST;
7008| if (str_contains((string) $templateSlug, 'bpm-notification') || $type === 'info') {
7009| $notificationType = \App\Entity\NotificationsCenter::TYPE_SYSTEM;
7010| }
7011| $this->notificationsCenterService->createNotification(
7012| recipient: $user,
7013| hub: 'Hub de Operações',
7014| product: 'Workflow BPM',
7015| content: trim($title . ': ' . $message),
7016| type: $notificationType,
7017| sender: null,
7018| buttonUrl: '/chat?adriana=1',
7019| flush: false
7020| );
7021| }
7022|
7023| $this->log('info', '✅ Notificação in-app criada', [
7024| 'userId' => $user->getId(),
7025| 'title' => $title
7026| ]);
7027| } catch (\Exception $e) {
7028| $this->log('error', 'Erro ao criar notificação in-app', ['error' => $e->getMessage()]);
7029| }
7030|
7031| // 2️⃣ EMAIL (se houver template ou corpo)
7032| // NOTA: executeSendEmail() JÁ envia mensagem no chat automaticamente
7033| // conforme documentação (Email + Chat em um único canal)
7034| if ($templateSlug || !empty($emailTemplateBody)) {
7035| try {
7036| $emailConfig = [
7037| 'to' => $user->getEmail(),
7038| 'subject' => $title,
7039| 'body' => $emailTemplateBody,
7040| 'template' => $templateSlug,
7041| '_resolved_recipient_type' => $recipientType,
7042| // Keep request decision links when routing through executeSendEmail;
7043| // chat action buttons depend on these URLs.
7044| 'approve_url' => $config['approve_url'] ?? null,
7045| 'reject_url' => $config['reject_url'] ?? null,
7046| 'approve_button_text' => $config['approve_button_text'] ?? null,
7047| 'reject_button_text' => $config['reject_button_text'] ?? null,
7048| 'request_type_label' => $config['request_type_label'] ?? null,
7049| 'record_name' => $config['record_name'] ?? null,
7050| 'system_sender' => $config['system_sender'] ?? null,
7051| ];
7052| if (filter_var($config['skip_auto_email_template'] ?? false, FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN)) {
7053| $emailConfig['skip_auto_email_template'] = true;
7054| }
7055|
7056| $emailResult = $this->executeSendEmail($emailConfig, $member, $recipientContext);
7057|
7058| if ($emailResult['sent'] ?? false) {
7059| $emailsSent[] = $user->getEmail();
7060| // Contabilizar mensagens de chat enviadas automaticamente pelo executeSendEmail
7061| if (isset($emailResult['chatMessagesSent']) && $emailResult['chatMessagesSent'] > 0) {
7062| $chatMessagesSent = array_merge($chatMessagesSent, $emailResult['chatUserIds'] ?? []);
7063| }
7064| $this->log('info', '✅ Email enviado via notificação (chat incluído automaticamente)', [
7065| 'to' => $user->getEmail(),
7066| 'subject' => $title
7067| ]);
7068| }
7069| } catch (\Exception $e) {
7070| $this->log('error', 'Erro ao enviar email via notificação', [
7071| 'error' => $e->getMessage(),
7072| 'to' => $user->getEmail()
7073| ]);
7074| }
7075| }
7076| }
7077| }
7078|
7079| $this->entityManager->flush();
7080|
Request #23
deepseek-v4-flash
P:66K C:162 CR:63.87K CW:0
2086ms
Reasoning
There's a subtlety: the NotificationSpecialist gets `message` = plain text; chat message with html? Need to continue reading executeNotify beyond 7080 to see what's returned.
Now let me read the `executeSendEmail` code around lines 13903-13960 where the system_sender logic applies (the actual chat message path).
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 14020, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 13840}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15387)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 13840-14020
13840| error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] Resultado: " . json_encode($result));
13841|
13842| if ($result['sent'] ?? false) {
13843| $chatUserIds[] = $user->getId();
13844| }
13845| }
13846|
13847| if (!empty($chatUserIds)) {
13848| $this->log('info', '💬 Mensagens no chat enviadas automaticamente', [
13849| 'recipientType' => $recipientType,
13850| 'userIds' => $chatUserIds,
13851| 'count' => count($chatUserIds)
13852| ]);
13853| error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] ✅ SUCESSO - Enviado para " . count($chatUserIds) . " usuário(s)");
13854| }
13855|
13856| } catch (\Exception $e) {
13857| error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] ❌ ERRO: " . $e->getMessage());
13858| error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] Stack: " . $e->getTraceAsString());
13859|
13860| $this->log('error', 'Erro ao enviar mensagens no chat para tipo de destinatário', [
13861| 'recipientType' => $recipientType,
13862| 'error' => $e->getMessage()
13863| ]);
13864| }
13865|
13866| error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] FIM - Total enviado: " . count($chatUserIds));
13867|
13868| return $chatUserIds;
13869| }
13870|
13871| /**
13872| * Envia mensagem no chat - canal compartilhado OU mensagem direta
13873| *
13874| * - employee/collaborator/candidate → Mensagem DIRETA do manager para o usuário
13875| * - flow_responsible/responsible/manager/outros → Canal "Suporte Meta" compartilhado
13876| *
13877| * @param User $user Destinatário da mensagem
13878| * @param string $title Título/assunto
13879| * @param string $message Corpo da mensagem
13880| * @param FlowInstanceMember|null $member Membro do fluxo (para contexto)
13881| * @param string|null $recipientType Tipo de destinatário (employee, flow_responsible, etc.)
13882| * @return array ['sent' => bool, 'conversationId' => int|null, 'messageId' => int|null]
13883| */
13884| private function sendChatNotification(User $user, string $title, string $message, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, ?string $recipientType = null, array $config = []): array
13885| {
13886| try {
13887| // 1. Obter a empresa do membro/usuário
13888| $company = null;
13889| if ($member && $member->getFlowInstance()) {
13890| $company = $member->getFlowInstance()->getCompany();
13891| }
13892|
13893| if (!$company) {
13894| // Tentar obter empresa do usuário via CompanyMembers
13895| $companyMember = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\CompanyMembers::class)
13896| ->findOneBy(['user' => $user]);
13897| if ($companyMember) {
13898| $company = $companyMember->getCompany();
13899| }
13900| }
13901|
13902| if (!$company) {
13903| $this->log('warning', 'Não foi possível determinar empresa para envio de chat', [
13904| 'userId' => $user->getId()
13905| ]);
13906| return ['sent' => false, 'error' => 'Empresa não encontrada'];
13907| }
13908|
13909| // 2. Determinar canal:
13910| // - CRM responsibles (record_owner/board_owner) must receive direct messages
13911| // - employee/collaborator/candidate already use direct mode
13912| // - request_notification actions (com approve_url/reject_url) também devem ser mensagens diretas,
13913| // independente do recipient_type (ex.: direct_manager, company_member no assessment)
13914| $isRequestNotification = !empty($config['approve_url']) || !empty($config['reject_url']);
13915| // Notificações sistêmicas são geradas pela assistente "Adriana",
13916| // não por um gestor específico: a mensagem no chat deve sair sem remetente
13917| // (userId = null), que o front renderiza como Adriana/Sistema.
13918| $isSystemSender = filter_var($config['system_sender'] ?? false, FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN)
13919| || ($member instanceof FlowInstanceMember
13920| && $member->getSourceType() === PayrollClosingBpmnService::SOURCE_TYPE);
13921| // 'direct' is used by sendChatToSpecificEmails when the user was already resolved —
13922| // always send a personal direct message in that case.
13923| // training_group_responsible / responsible also get direct messages.
13924| $isDirectMessage = $isRequestNotification
13925| || in_array($recipientType, [
13926| 'employee', 'collaborator', 'candidate',
13927| 'record_owner', 'board_owner',
13928| 'direct_manager', 'company_member', 'flow_responsible',
13929| 'responsible', 'training_group_responsible',
13930| 'direct',
13931| ], true);
13932|
13933| $fullMessage = "📢 **{$title}**\n\n{$message}";
13934|
13935| // Sistema: o remetente é a própria Adriana, então a notificação deve cair na
13936| // conversa exclusiva da Adriana (ai_assistant) do destinatário — e não numa conversa
13937| // "individual" entre gestores. Isso também evita o caso em que, quando destinatário e
13938| // gestor da empresa são o mesmo usuário, a busca por conversa individual acabava
13939| // recaindo na conversa de outra pessoa.
13940| if ($isSystemSender) {
13941| $assistantConversation = $this->getOrCreateAssistantConversation($user);
13942| if (!$assistantConversation) {
13943| return ['sent' => false, 'error' => 'Não foi possível obter a conversa da Adriana'];
13944| }
13945|
13946| $this->initializeChatUnreadBaseline($assistantConversation, $user);
13947|
13948| $chatMessage = new \App\Entity\ChatMessage();
13949| $chatMessage->setConversationId($assistantConversation->getId());
13950| $chatMessage->setConversation($assistantConversation);
13951| $chatMessage->setUserId(null); // Mensagem da Adriana em conversa ai_assistant
13952| $chatMessage->setMessage($fullMessage);
13953| $chatMessage->setTimestamp(new \DateTime());
13954| $chatMessage->setIsInitialMessage(false);
13955|
13956| $this->entityManager->persist($chatMessage);
13957| $this->entityManager->flush();
13958|
13959| return [
13960| 'sent' => true,
13961| 'conversationId' => $assistantConversation->getId(),
13962| 'messageId' => $chatMessage->getId()
13963| ];
13964| }
13965|
13966| if ($isDirectMessage) {
13967| // ===== MENSAGEM DIRETA: Manager → Employee =====
13968| error_log("💬 [sendChatNotification] Modo DIRETO para recipientType={$recipientType}");
13969|
13970| // Buscar ROLE_MANAGER da empresa
13971| $adminUser = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\User::class)
13972| ->createQueryBuilder('u')
13973| ->where('u.company = :company')
13974| ->andWhere('u.roles LIKE :role')
13975| ->setParameter('company', $company)
13976| ->setParameter('role', '%ROLE_MANAGER%')
13977| ->setMaxResults(1)
13978| ->getQuery()
13979| ->getOneOrNullResult();
13980|
13981| if (!$adminUser) {
13982| return ['sent' => false, 'error' => 'Admin da empresa não encontrado'];
13983| }
13984|
13985| // Buscar ou criar conversa individual entre manager e employee
13986| $individualConversation = $this->getOrCreateIndividualConversation($adminUser, $user, $company);
13987|
13988| if (!$individualConversation) {
13989| return ['sent' => false, 'error' => 'Não foi possível criar conversa individual'];
13990| }
13991|
13992| $chatMessage = new \App\Entity\ChatMessage();
13993| $chatMessage->setConversationId($individualConversation->getId());
13994| $chatMessage->setConversation($individualConversation);
13995| $chatMessage->setUserId($adminUser->getId());
13996| $chatMessage->setMessage($fullMessage);
13997| $chatMessage->setTimestamp(new \DateTime());
13998| $chatMessage->setIsInitialMessage(false);
13999|
14000| $this->entityManager->persist($chatMessage);
14001| $this->entityManager->flush();
14002|
14003| return [
14004| 'sent' => true,
14005| 'conversationId' => $individualConversation->getId(),
14006| 'messageId' => $chatMessage->getId()
14007| ];
14008| } else {
14009| // ===== CANAL COMPARTILHADO: Suporte Meta =====
14010| error_log("💬 [sendChatNotification] Modo COMPARTILHADO (Suporte Meta) para recipientType={$recipientType}");
14011|
14012| $supportConversation = $this->getOrCreateSupportConversation($company);
14013|
14014| if (!$supportConversation) {
14015| return ['sent' => false, 'error' => 'Não foi possível criar/encontrar canal de suporte'];
14016| }
14017|
14018| $this->ensureUserParticipation($user, $supportConversation);
14019|
14020| $chatMessage = new \App\Entity\ChatMessage();
Request #24
deepseek-v4-flash
P:68.78K C:1.62K CR:66.05K CW:0
12613ms
Reasoning
Important: for `system_sender` they route to assistant conversation. But the change expanded from `$isPayrollSystemSender` (member source type PayrollClosingBpmnService) to `$isSystemSender = config['system_sender'] || source is payroll`. This means all system_sender notifications now go to the Adriana conversation. This is only in diff code path used by the new action plus possibly other actions that set system_sender true. Search for system_sender usages to make sure there aren't existing notifications already passing system_sender: true that previously were treated differently — actually previously the code didn't read system_sender at all; any system_sender config passed before would be ignored (they went to shared/direct channel with manager as sender). So now enabling them to be treated as system may change behavior for existing flows. Search for 'system_sender' references across the codebase to check if other automations use it.
Also note: In the chat message via `executeSendEmail` path, the message used in chat is $fullMessage, but they don't embed reviewButtonHtml into chat (chat messages have buttons?). In the test, chat message's text is plain text with title and message (contains 'Revisar desligamento eSocial (S-2299)'). No HTML link in chat message; the in-app notification (NotificationsCenter) has buttonUrl '/chat?adriana=1'. The notification center link points to chat with Adriana; but wait the in-app NotificationSpecialist (badge) is created with plain message text (no link, since message_html isn't used for NotificationSpecialist), and NotificationsCenter button URL is '/chat?adriana=1' which opens chat with Adriana — and the chat message instructs to review. And the actual review link is only embedded in the email HTML (reviewButtonHtml) because emailConfig body is messageHtml.
Hmm wait, do they even send an email? In testCreateEsocialDraftCreatesPendingEventAndSendsChatAsAdriana, mailer is expected once. executeNotify calls executeSendEmail (if emailConfig) which sends email and chat? Wait, executeSendEmail might send the email and chat? The comment says executeSendEmail() already sends chat automatically. But for system_sender it'd call sendChatNotification with system_sender true → assistant conversation. Hmm.
Actually there is nuance: within executeNotify loop they call executeSendEmail which sends email + chat. But then chatMessage path within executeSendEmail... in the actual new action, they call executeNotify with config that includes title/message/message_html/system_sender, but no 'template' and no 'email' body? Wait emailConfig includes body = emailTemplateBody (messageHtml). Because messageHtml is non-empty, executeSendEmail is invoked, and it likely sends both email (with HTML body) and chat. The chat message is created from the plain message? Or from HTML? Let me not dig too deep; tests assert chat message contains title text and html contains link.
Since this flow is internal and tested, we can consider passing.
Now, a bigger question: the entire method sends the email to responsible. Is an e-mail intended when e-mail not configured? In test with mailerEnabled false, responsibleUser has email null. The user repo returns null (so no user found?) — wait in that scenario, they didn't pass responsible email. resolveRecipients? Let me understand: config to = 'company_member', company_member_id = responsible. Hmm 'company_member' recipient type; user repository findOneBy email null returns null in the mock for mailer disabled. If user is null then no notification is created and no email sent. But then test asserts notification count 1 NotificationSpecialist persisted! Actually wait, test with mailerEnabled false (worker missing) asserts count of NotificationSpecialist = 1. But if user resolves null? In that test, buildOffboardingFixture() no email, but responsibleMember->getUser() exists (responsibleUser). Hmm, the user resolution probably uses the member's user relation directly, not the email query. Not our concern.
Actually wait, in worker missing test, user repo findOneBy returns null because !$mailerEnabled. But NotificationSpecialist is persisted once, meaning $user found via something else. Possibly resolveRecipients uses member user relation or company_member_id. This is test internal anyway.
OK let me focus on real potential bugs in new code:
1. `buildReviewUrl` — route 'my_company_member_manage' with parameter 'member'. Check the route name and parameter correctness. Search the codebase for 'my_company_member_manage' route to confirm it exists with param name 'member'. If wrong, generated URL throws RouteNotFoundException. In test, router is mocked; in real container, if route doesn't exist, exception in try catch → returns success false with error? Actually executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft wraps everything in try/catch Throwable; route exception caught → returns success false 'error'. That would break flow. Let's verify route existence.
2. In `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, they use `$this->entityManager->getRepository(EsocialDadosTrabalhador::class)->findOneBy(['companyMember' => $companyMember])` — wait; `EsocialDadosTrabalhador` uses companyMember relationship? Search entity to confirm the property name. Let me check EsocialDadosTrabalhador for property companyMember. In the test's trabalhador() method they call setCompanyMember($member). So presumably exists.
3. `findByTrabalhador` on EsocialDadosRemuneracaoRepository: they call `findByTrabalhador($esocialTrabalhador)`. Let's check its signature and that it takes EsocialDadosTrabalhador and returns ?EsocialDadosRemuneracao (maybe single). In the mock, return $remuneracao.
4. `OffboardingMember->getDismissalDate()` returns DateTime? Used.
5. Metadata read for offboardingMemberId resolution: findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember — need to see that function. Let's search.
6. Potential problem: the employee user may not exist — but the new action sends chat to responsible; fine.
7. In the migration: `ensureAutomation` inserts flow_automations with `flow_template_id` NULL and no company? Check the schema for flow_automations, columns maybe include company_id, product? Might be nullable. Another existing seed migration may set company_id etc. Let's inspect other seed migrations for the offboarding flow (there might be an existing seed migration for 'fluxo-de-saida' or flow templates to copy conventions). Let me search migrations dir for similar seeds referencing flow_automations insert to compare column usage.
Let's also verify route.
Let me run several searches in parallel.
Tool Calls (3)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "my_company_member_manage"}
Result
File: config/routes.yaml
Match lines: 2
1318|my_company_member_manage:
1322|my_company_member_manage_v2:
File: src/Controller/CompanyController.php
Match lines: 5
2855| * Ficha do colaborador V2 (design Figma). Rota: my_company_member_manage_v2.
2961| return $this->redirectToRoute('my_company_member_manage_v2', ['member' => $member]);
3014| return $this->redirectToRoute('my_company_member_manage_v2', ['member' => $member]);
3018| return $this->redirectToRoute('my_company_member_manage_v2', ['member' => $member]);
3060| return $this->redirectToRoute('my_company_member_manage_v2', ['member' => $member]);
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystemRiskIntelligenceController.php
Match lines: 10
2708| 'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
3081| 'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
3429| 'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
3837| 'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
4318| 'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
4856| 'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
5410| 'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
5835| 'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
5978| 'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
6591| 'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
File: src/Controller/Finance/PayrollFinanceController.php
Match lines: 1
3591| $actionUrl = $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', $params) . '#dados_colaborador';
File: src/Controller/MetaHuman/ProfessionalDecisionSheetController.php
Match lines: 1
57| 'classicProfileUrl' => $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage_v2', ['member' => $member]),
File: src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php
Match lines: 1
273| ? $this->router->generate('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => $companyMember->getId()])
File: src/Service/Ontology/OntologySignalBridgeService.php
Match lines: 1
1977| 'profile_url' => $this->urlGenerator->generate('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => $memberId]),
File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/RiskSignalsPresenter.php
Match lines: 1
901| ? $this->urlGenerator->generate('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => $memberId])
File: templates/ai_committee/partials/_specialized_hub_parties_section.html.twig
Match lines: 1
26| {% set profileUrl = memberId ? path('my_company_member_manage', {member: memberId}) : '' %}
File: templates/calendar_member/tabs/_permissions_tab.html.twig
Match lines: 1
507| href="{{ path('my_company_member_manage', { 'member': m.id }) }}"
File: templates/company/member.html.twig
Match lines: 2
120| <form action="{{ path('my_company_member_manage', {'member': member.id}) }}" method="post">
273| url: '{{path('my_company_member_manage', {'member': member.id})}}',
File: templates/company/member_v2_figma.html.twig
Match lines: 2
823| <form id="member-edit-form" action="{{ path('my_company_member_manage', {'member': member.id}) }}" method="post">
1390| url: '{{ path('my_company_member_manage', {'member': member.id}) }}',
File: templates/company/members.html.twig
Match lines: 2
918| <a href="{% if app.user.isManager or app.user.isSuperAdmin %}{{path('my_company_member_manage', {member: member.id})}}{% else %}javascript:void(0);{% endif %}"
939| action="{{path('my_company_member_manage', {member: member.id})}}">
File: templates/company/members_v2.html.twig
Match lines: 1
519| 'url': path('my_company_member_manage', {'member': member.id}),
File: templates/company/teams_permissions.html.twig
Match lines: 1
509| <a href="{{path('my_company_member_manage', {member: member.id})}}" class="btn mr-2 btn-default btn-sm" data-placement="top" data-rel="tooltip" type="submit" title="Editar" data-original-title="Editar">
File: templates/company/teams_permissions_v2.html.twig
Match lines: 1
519| 'url': path('my_company_member_manage', {member: member.id}),
File: templates/components/permissions_tab.html.twig
Match lines: 1
787| <a href="{{path('my_company_member_manage', {member: member.id})}}" class="btn mr-1 btn-default btn-sm" title="Editar">
File: templates/governance/cases/partials/_gc_det_person_row.html.twig
Match lines: 2
19| <a href="{{ path('my_company_member_manage', { member: person.id }) }}"
35| <a href="{{ path('my_company_member_manage', { member: person.id }) }}"
File: templates/governance/cases/partials/_gc_det_section_associated_people.html.twig
Match lines: 1
11| data-profile-url-template="{{ path('my_company_member_manage', { member: '__MEMBER__' })|e('html_attr') }}">
File: templates/hubs/visao_metahuman.html.twig
Match lines: 1
1566| url: '{{ path('my_company_member_manage', {member: 0}) }}'.replace('/0', '/' + member.id)
File: templates/layoutAdmin.html.twig
Match lines: 2
1245| <a href="{{path('my_company_members_list')}}" class="nav-link" data-rels="my_company_member_manage my_company_invited_members">
1581| <a id="nav_item_my_company_members_list_operations" href="{{ path('my_company_members_list') }}" class="nav-link" data-rels="my_company_member_manage my_company_invited_members my_company_teams_list my_company_team_manage">
File: templates/layoutUser.html.twig
Match lines: 1
305| {% set sidebar_profile_url = sidebar_company_member ? path('my_company_member_manage', {'member': sidebar_company_member.id}) : path('user_profile') %}
File: templates/new-goals/pdi/pdi_permissions.html.twig
Match lines: 1
416| <a href="{{path('my_company_member_manage', {member: member.id})}}"
File: templates/offboarding/old_files/permissions.twig
Match lines: 1
576| <a href="{{path('my_company_member_manage', {member: member.id})}}" class="btn mr-2 btn-default btn-sm" data-placement="top" data-rel="tooltip" type="submit" title="Editar" data-original-title="Editar">
File: templates/onboarding/old_files/permissions.twig
Match lines: 1
862| <a href="{{path('my_company_member_manage', {member: member.id})}}" class="btn mr-1 btn-default btn-sm" title="Editar">
File: templates/partials/app_search.html.twig
Match lines: 1
200| const MEMBER_PAGE_URL = '{{ path('my_company_member_manage', {'member': '__MEMBER_ID__'}) }}';
File: templates/partials/app_search_user.html.twig
Match lines: 1
218| const MEMBER_PAGE_URL = '{{ path('my_company_member_manage', {'member': '__MEMBER_ID__'}) }}';
File: templates/people_analytics/module_detail.html.twig
Match lines: 1
160| onclick="window.location.href='{{ path('my_company_member_manage', {'member': selected_member_id}) }}#'">
File: templates/permissions_tags/member_tab_permissions.html.twig
Match lines: 1
827| 'url': path('my_company_member_manage', {member: member.id}),
File: templates/structural_research/structural_research_permission.html.twig
Match lines: 1
438| <a href="{{path('my_company_member_manage', {member: member.id})}}" class="btn mr-1 btn-default btn-sm" title="Editar">
File: tests/Service/MetaHuman/MetaHumanRoutesYamlContractTest.php
Match lines: 1
27| 'my_company_member_manage_v2',
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "function findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember"}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 1 15340| private function findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember(FlowInstanceMember $member): ?\App\Entity\OffboardingMember
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "function findByTrabalhador"}
Result
File: src/Repository/EsocialDadosRemuneracaoRepository.php Match lines: 2 504| public function findByTrabalhador($esocialTrabalhadorId): ?EsocialDadosRemuneracao 665| public function findByTrabalhadorArray($trabalhador): array File: src/Repository/EsocialS1210EvtPgtosRepository.php Match lines: 1 432| public function findByTrabalhador($trabalhador) File: src/Repository/EsocialS2190EvtAdmPrelimRepository.php Match lines: 1 79| public function findByTrabalhador($trabalhador): ?EsocialS2190EvtAdmPrelim File: src/Repository/EsocialS2200EvtAdmissaoRepository.php Match lines: 1 79| public function findByTrabalhador($trabalhador): ?EsocialS2200EvtAdmissao File: src/Repository/EsocialS2205EvtAltCadastralRepository.php Match lines: 1 70| public function findByTrabalhador($trabalhador): ?EsocialS2205EvtAltCadastral File: src/Repository/EsocialS2206EvtAltContratualRepository.php Match lines: 1 74| public function findByTrabalhador($trabalhador): ?EsocialS2206EvtAltContratual
Request #25
deepseek-v4-flash
P:73.19K C:262 CR:70.4K CW:0
2309ms
Reasoning
Route exists. Now let me look at `findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember` at line 15340 and also the surrounding code (the function was added in this diff? Actually search found it at 15340, which may be existing). Let me read it.
Also read findByTrabalhador signature to see the param type (it takes $esocialTrabalhadorId maybe entity or id). Let's read repository around line 504.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 15387, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 15330}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15387)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 15330-15387
15330|
15331| } catch (\Exception $e) {
15332| error_log("[AUTOMATION] ❌ delay_platform_access_removal error: " . $e->getMessage());
15333| return ['success' => false, 'error' => $e->getMessage()];
15334| }
15335| }
15336|
15337| /**
15338| * Busca o OffboardingMember correspondente a um FlowInstanceMember
15339| */
15340| private function findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember(FlowInstanceMember $member): ?\App\Entity\OffboardingMember
15341| {
15342| $sourceId = $member->getSourceId();
15343| $user = $member->getUser();
15344|
15345| // PRIORIDADE 1: Buscar pelo offboardingMemberId no activities_progress
15346| $activitiesProgress = $member->getActivitiesProgress() ?? [];
15347| if (!empty($activitiesProgress['offboardingMemberId'])) {
15348| $omId = (int) $activitiesProgress['offboardingMemberId'];
15349| $offboardingMember = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\OffboardingMember::class)->find($omId);
15350| if ($offboardingMember) {
15351| error_log("[AUTOMATION] findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember: Encontrado via activities_progress.offboardingMemberId = {$omId}");
15352| return $offboardingMember;
15353| }
15354| }
15355|
15356| // FALLBACK: Busca tradicional por offboarding + companyMember
15357| if (!$sourceId || !$user) {
15358| return null;
15359| }
15360|
15361| // Buscar o offboarding
15362| $offboarding = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\Offboarding::class)->find($sourceId);
15363| if (!$offboarding) {
15364| return null;
15365| }
15366|
15367| // Buscar company_member do user
15368| $company = $offboarding->getCompany();
15369| $companyMember = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\CompanyMembers::class)
15370| ->findOneBy(['user' => $user, 'company' => $company]);
15371|
15372| if (!$companyMember) {
15373| return null;
15374| }
15375|
15376| // Buscar offboarding_member
15377| $offboardingMember = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\OffboardingMember::class)
15378| ->findOneBy(['offboarding' => $offboarding, 'companyMember' => $companyMember]);
15379|
15380| if ($offboardingMember) {
15381| error_log("[AUTOMATION] findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember: Encontrado via offboarding+companyMember (fallback), OM ID = {$offboardingMember->getId()}");
15382| }
15383|
15384| return $offboardingMember;
15385| }
15386|}
15387|
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 520, "file_path": "src/Repository/EsocialDadosRemuneracaoRepository.php", "start_line": 495}
Result
File: src/Repository/EsocialDadosRemuneracaoRepository.php (Total lines: 741)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 495-520
495| ],
496| ],
497| ],
498| ],
499| ];
500|
501| return $this->saveDadosRemuneracao($data, $company, $companyMember, $esocialDadosTrabalhador);
502| }
503|
504| public function findByTrabalhador($esocialTrabalhadorId): ?EsocialDadosRemuneracao
505| {
506| return $this->createQueryBuilder('e')
507| ->andWhere('e.esocialTrabalhador = :esocialTrabalhadorId')
508| ->setParameter('esocialTrabalhadorId', $esocialTrabalhadorId)
509| ->orderBy('e.id', 'DESC')
510| ->setMaxResults(1)
511| ->getQuery()
512| ->getOneOrNullResult();
513| }
514|
515| /**
516| * Extrai todos os dados da remuneração eSocial para formatação no FlowableVariablesService
517| *
518| * @param int $remuneracaoId ID da remuneração (EsocialDadosRemuneracao)
519| * @return array|null Dados estruturados da remuneração e relacionamentos, ou null se não encontrado
520| */
Request #26
deepseek-v4-flash
P:74.58K C:1.88K CR:73.34K CW:0
15433ms
Reasoning
Now, let me analyze further details of the new action and other new code for issues. Let me examine the new method in AutomationExecutionService around lines 14930-15180 in context (already have most). Let me read the whole block carefully for the logic to find any bug not covered by confirmed findings.
Confirmed findings:
1. Migration down incomplete.
2. executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft is god-object-like large method.
3. findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal may create a duplicate when dismissal date changed (since it matches date OR null) — wait actually issue #3 says: pending draft with different date is NOT reused → duplicate draft event. Yes.
4. findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal treats any non-pendente status as official/not editable.
So new possible issues to find:
A. Entity type change `?int`→`?string` for percAliment/vrAlim getters and setters. But property types are still untyped (no native declaration), so setter/ getter type only enforced at method boundary. Underlying column decimal → DBAL returns string. Previously getter `?int` would TypeError when returning string. Now fixed. But what about EsocialDataService/others that call with these values and might use arithmetic/format expecting int? Let's check ESocialDataService usage context around lines 1078 and 1330 to see how percaliment/vralim are emitted, maybe they need 2 decimals. If the code already produced float... Let's read a bit.
B. There is asymmetry: `OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService::applyPayload` uses decimalOrNull for percAliment/vrAlim producing strings like "12.50". Good.
C. `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::saveEventS2299` — it now passes null when empty string; but `$data['percAliment'] ?? null` could pass raw user-provided string "12,50" into setPercAliment (?string), DB stores "12,50"? Since before type ?int, passing "12,50" string would TypeError (PHP strict?) Actually repository file no strict types → "12,50" as string into ?int setter would coerce "12,50" to 12. The setter is part of the changed code? No - setter signature changed in Entity file in this PR. In old code setter expected ?int and got values from $data which may be string; but coercion in non-strict mode converts string numeric into int silently, but "12,50" with comma → warning + (int) 12. Now with ?string, values stored as string "12,50" into decimal column? DB decimal would not accept comma format → error at flush. Hmm! Actually wait, where does $data come from in saveEventS2299? This is a pre-existing method called from somewhere that passes form fields. Previously, setPercAliment(?int) coerced strings. Now with the entity changed to ?string, whatever numeric formats passed (e.g., "12.50") will be stored raw as string into decimal column which is fine if format uses dot. But if format uses comma (Brazilian input "12,50"), storing "12,50" into DECIMAL(10,2) column → MySQL would interpret and might error or store 12.50? Actually MySQL decimal conversion of '12,50' results in 12 (truncation at comma) with no error. Hmm.
This is speculative. But there might be a real regression in saveEventS2299 because previously the value passed through int coercion and stored as integer percent. But since column is decimal, this is a fix to align types.
Let me examine other callers of setPercAliment / setVrAlim in codebase to check potential type conflicts with new signature. Since getters/setters changed from int to string, existing callers passing ints will still work (int coerces to string) but callers passing floats with comma? etc.
Actually, since there's no strict_types in callers, passing int to ?string setter is fine.
But wait, there could be callers of `getPercAliment()` who then pass into arithmetic expecting int, e.g., formatting "12.50" vs. integer percent (12). Previously (before this PR) the getter returned ?int, but the property is decimal → Doctrine returns string on hydration; calling getPercAliment() typed ?int returning string → TypeError. Unless existing data was stored as int? Hmm. Actually DB decimal type; Doctrine hydrates DECIMAL as string always. So pre-PR code reading an existing S2299 record with percAliment set would crash. Unless all values were null so far, or code that reads those never had the getter invoked with a value... Yet the bug fix (commit message says fix...) So probably previously percAliment was set only as int values stored in DB as "12.00", hydration returns "12.00" string, getPercAliment(): ?int returns string → TypeError. That's exactly the bug fixed. OK.
Potential real issue: callers who relied on getPercAliment() returning int (before this PR) would already have crashed, so no one relied. Fine.
D. Now check `setIndPagtoApi` change semantics: `isset($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado']) && $data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] !== ''` → when value false (boolean false) => returns 'N'. When 0 => 'N'. When '0' => 'N'. When 'S' => 'S'. When '' => null. When null => null (since isset false). OK.
E. The Migration: seeds actions etc. Might double-seed flow_activities with 'Offboarding' names that collide with existing? It checks existence by name within stage. Fine.
F. In migration ensureStage & ensureActivity & ensureAutomation methods query table existence each time through separate SELECTs — fine.
G. Migration: `tableExists` with createSchemaManager each call heavy, but migration not hot.
H. In the migration `up()`: The query filters companies eligible; But also the workflow rows that are eligible; But templates are created per company, not global. Wait—is flow_templates per company or global? Template row includes workflow_id and company_id. Actually templates created with same name per company for each eligible workflow; That might multiply template per company with identical structure. Might be intended design (companies clone their own flow). Since each company has its own workflow row for fluxo-de-saida, the seed creates one template per company. That seems intended.
I. Consider 'ensureWorkflowProduct' — it adds a workflow_products row with order_index 0 for each eligible workflow that doesn't have offboarding product linked. If the workflow already has other products linked, order index 0 might reorder columns? Actually insertion only if not exists. order index 0; if multiple products exist, order may conflict (two products order_index 0). Given comment says preserve order for multi-product flows when already exists. Fine.
J. Migration up has no explicit transaction (isTransactional false) - but the code uses separate executeStatement calls; a failure mid-way leaves partial seeding. On rerun, ensure methods are idempotent. OK.
K. Version class name ends with date 20260901171000 and current time real world 2026-09-03; fine.
L. Check ensureAutomation INSERT column flow_template_id: They set NULL. But the flow_automations table maybe requires flow_template_id NOT NULL? Since template structure uses flow_template_id to link automations to template? Let's inspect the entity/table structure for flow_automations columns and how automations are seeded elsewhere (e.g., another seed migration or service that seeds templates). If flow_template_id null then when a user instantiates flow from template, the automation may not be copied? Actually let me check how flow templates are applied: When creating a flow instance from template, do they clone stages/activities/automations? If automations are copied, they must be linked to template and stage. The INSERT sets flow_stage_id but flow_template_id NULL. Let me compare with a similar existing seeding code in the app (e.g., some service that seeds template defaults for products). Search for INSERT INTO flow_automations in the codebase.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "INSERT INTO flow_automations"}
Result
File: docs/PDI_AUTOMATIONS_GUIDE.md Match lines: 1 89|INSERT INTO flow_automations ( File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php Match lines: 3 758| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index) 766| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index) 781| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index) File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php Match lines: 1 454| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, fixed_stage_type, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id,"}
Result
File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php Match lines: 3 758| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index) 766| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index) 781| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index) File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php Match lines: 1 454| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, fixed_stage_type, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index)
Request #27
deepseek-v4-flash
P:76.93K C:119 CR:76.42K CW:0
1654ms
Reasoning
Let me look at Version20260518151423.php to compare seeding conventions (does it set flow_template_id to templateId and fixed_stage_type?).
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 800, "file_path": "migrations/Version20260518151423.php", "start_line": 700}
Result
File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php (Total lines: 1558)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 700-800
700| string $anchorDate
701| ): void {
702| $cycles = count($phaseDays);
703| $stages = [];
704| $orderIndex = 0;
705|
706| for ($phase = 1; $phase <= $cycles; $phase++) {
707| $phaseIdx = $phase - 1;
708| $days = (int) ($phaseDays[$phaseIdx] ?? 30);
709| $startOn = $phaseStartDates[$phaseIdx] ?? $anchorDate;
710| $advanceOn = $phaseAdvanceOnDates[$phaseIdx] ?? $anchorDate;
711|
712| $stages[] = [
713| 'name' => "Fase {$phase} em Andamento",
714| 'desc' => "Produtos iniciam em {$startOn} e avançam após {$days} dias. Fim do bloco: {$advanceOn}.",
715| 'cat' => 'andamento', 'phase' => $phase, 'order' => $orderIndex++,
716| 'adv' => ['auto_advance' => true, 'conditions' => [
717| ['type' => 'time_elapsed', 'days' => $days, 'enabled' => true, 'default' => true],
718| ['type' => 'products_completion', 'percentage' => 100, 'enabled' => false, 'default' => false],
719| ]],
720| ];
721| $stages[] = [
722| 'name' => "Análise Periódica Fase {$phase}",
723| 'desc' => "Análise estruturada da Fase {$phase}.",
724| 'cat' => 'feedback_1on1', 'phase' => $phase, 'order' => $orderIndex++, 'adv' => [],
725| ];
726| }
727| $stages[] = [
728| 'name' => 'Análise Jornada',
729| 'desc' => 'Etapa final da jornada para consolidação dos resultados.',
730| 'cat' => 'analise_jornada', 'phase' => null, 'order' => $orderIndex, 'adv' => [],
731| ];
732|
733| $stageIds = [];
734| foreach ($stages as $s) {
735| $this->connection->executeStatement(
736| 'INSERT INTO flow_stages (flow_template_id, product_id, name, description, order_index, advance_rules, stage_category, phase_number)
737| VALUES (:t, NULL, :name, :desc, :o, :adv, :cat, :phase)',
738| ['t' => $templateId, 'name' => $s['name'], 'desc' => $s['desc'], 'o' => $s['order'],
739| 'adv' => json_encode($s['adv'], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE), 'cat' => $s['cat'], 'phase' => $s['phase']]
740| );
741| $stageIds[$s['cat']][(string) ($s['phase'] ?? 'final')] = (int) $this->connection->lastInsertId();
742| }
743|
744| $products = array_values($workflowProductSlugs);
745| foreach ($stages as $s) {
746| $sid = $stageIds[$s['cat']][(string) ($s['phase'] ?? 'final')] ?? null;
747| if (!$sid) {
748| continue;
749| }
750|
751| if ($s['cat'] === 'andamento') {
752| $phaseIdx = max(0, (int) $s['phase'] - 1);
753| $scheduledDate = $phaseStartDates[$phaseIdx] ?? $anchorDate;
754| $daysInStage = (int) ($phaseDays[$phaseIdx] ?? 30);
755| $prods = $this->resolveProductsForPhase($journeyCode, (int) $s['phase'], $products);
756|
757| $this->connection->executeStatement(
758| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index)
759| VALUES (:sid, NULL, :name, \'on_scheduled_date\', \'start_stage_products\', :acfg, :cond, :acts, 1, 0)',
760| ['sid' => $sid, 'name' => 'Na data de início da fase no calendário — iniciar produtos da etapa',
761| 'acfg' => json_encode(['products' => $prods], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
762| 'cond' => json_encode([$this->buildScheduledCondition($scheduledDate)], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
763| 'acts' => json_encode([['type' => 'start_stage_products', 'config' => ['products' => $prods], 'orderIndex' => 0]], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE)]
764| );
765| $this->connection->executeStatement(
766| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index)
767| VALUES (:sid, NULL, :name, \'on_days_in_stage\', \'move_to_next_stage\', \'[]\', :cond, :acts, 1, 1)',
768| ['sid' => $sid, 'name' => 'Após tempo na etapa — mover para próxima etapa',
769| 'cond' => json_encode([['type' => 'on_days_in_stage', 'config' => ['days' => $daysInStage, 'value' => $daysInStage, 'count_from_first_entry' => true], 'orderIndex' => 0]], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
770| 'acts' => json_encode([['type' => 'move_to_next_stage', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0]], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE)]
771| );
772| }
773|
774| if ($s['cat'] === 'feedback_1on1') {
775| $cfg = ['to' => 'direct_manager', 'recipient_type' => 'direct_manager', 'request_type' => 'cycle_feedback_decision',
776| 'title' => 'Decisão da Jornada Metahuman após a análise periódica',
777| 'message' => 'A unidade {{member_name}} concluiu uma etapa de análise periódica da Jornada Metahuman. Escolha o encaminhamento.',
778| 'approve_button_text' => 'Voltar para a fase atual', 'reject_button_text' => 'Avançar para a próxima fase',
779| 'template' => 'bpm-request_notification'];
780| $this->connection->executeStatement(
781| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index)
782| VALUES (:sid, NULL, :name, \'on_enter\', \'request_notification\', :acfg, :cond, :acts, 1, 0)',
783| ['sid' => $sid, 'name' => 'Solicitar decisão do gestor direto após a análise periódica',
784| 'acfg' => json_encode($cfg, JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
785| 'cond' => json_encode([['type' => 'on_enter', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0]], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
786| 'acts' => json_encode([['type' => 'request_notification', 'config' => $cfg, 'orderIndex' => 0]], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE)]
787| );
788| }
789| }
790| }
791|
792| // -------------------------------------------------------------------------
793| // 9. FLOW INSTANCES (plan seed — 1 per template per company)
794| // -------------------------------------------------------------------------
795|
796| private function seedFlowInstances(): void
797| {
798| // Instances are now seeded inline inside seedJornadaMetahumanTemplates().
799| // This method is kept for backward-compat / standalone call on existing DBs.
800| $codes = ['J1', 'J2', 'J3', 'J4', 'J5', 'J6', 'J7', 'J8', 'J9', 'J10'];
Request #28
deepseek-v4-flash
P:79.08K C:2.38K CR:76.8K CW:0
19062ms
Reasoning
I see. Version20260518151423 also seeds automations with flow_template_id NULL (using template id for stage), and stages with product_id NULL. So the convention matches. Good.
But wait: The new migration seeds flow_stages with product_id = $productId (offboarding product), while Version20260518151423 uses product_id NULL. And in `ensureStage`, it checks existing row by product_id = :productId AND product_slot_index IS NULL. Hmm, in the seed, they inserted flow_stages with product_id = productId and product_slot_index NULL. In flow_stage schema, when a stage belongs to a single-product flow, product_id might be used. Let me check the flow_stages table semantics - it might have company? Let's look at the entity FlowStage? Not sure relevant.
OK, let me now think about the migration more carefully for a subtle bug: The `up()` inserts templates referencing `workflow_id` and `company_id`. But what about `flow_templates` having unique constraints? Not necessarily.
Now the confirmed finding #1 covers down() not cleaning stages/automations. Also up() after down would create duplicates. I won't repeat.
Now let me examine the migration for any other potential real problems not yet confirmed.
1. In down() the DELETE of workflow_products uses subquery referencing flow_templates active rows. OK.
2. In up(), `ensureTemplateProduct` uses column 'template_type' = 'fixo' — but is 'fixo' a valid template_type enum? Let's check flow_template_products table columns/entity maybe template_type enum values like 'fixo','variavel'. Search for template_type 'fixo'.
3. Potential bug: `flow_stages` insert sets product_slot_index NULL. But flow_template_products inserted with slot_index 0. Are these consistent? Maybe stages need product_slot_index to align to template product slot index; NULL might represent single product? uncertain. Not enough info.
4. Another angle: The migration adds `workflow_products` link to all eligible workflows for companies, even those that already have active flow templates from previous seeds. Could change behavior: adding offboarding product to workflow 'fluxo-de-saida' might cause the app to display offboarding columns/activities for companies that already had an offboarding template but weren't using the product link? Hmm. Existing flows may not have offboarding product link because the offboarding flow feature previously used a different mechanism? Might be intentional though: workflow_products defines product availability.
This is speculative; I'd rather not flag.
Let me focus on functional/security issues in the new service & action.
Now, note in `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, when `$esocialTrabalhador` is found but there's no `remuneracao`, missing[] = esocial_remuneration_data; event remains null; eventStatus stays draft_only; metadata stores payload. Fine.
But, there's a subtle issue: `$this->findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember($member)` uses activities_progress; but the new metadata stored is 'esocialS2299Draft' on the member. When the automation runs again (e.g., the member enters the stage again?), findEventLinkedToOffboarding compares draftMetadata['offboardingMemberId'] to offboardingMember->getId. Fine.
Another area to verify: The `resolveEsocialS2299Responsible` first tries config responsible_id etc. But the YAML config for the action has `config_preset: to: flow_responsible`. There is no config UI (has_config: false). So the action has no configuration. Then in executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft, `$config['responsible_id']` will be null. Then resolveEsocialS2299Responsible checks flowResponsible = flowInstance->getFlowResponsible(); but wait, note it resolves to flow responsible of the flow instance. For an offboarding flow, is flow responsible the person who owns the offboarding? Possibly flow instance's flowResponsible. Then fallback to offboarding member's offboarding flow responsible. OK.
Now, let me look at how the config map 'employee_enters_stage' trigger is used: `$actionConfig` for the automation in the migration references 'conditions' => [on_enter], actions = create_esocial_s2299_draft, actionConfig contains to: flow_responsible, and _default_automation_id. But wait: executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft receives `$config` = the automation's action config? In executeAction the switch dispatch passes `$config`. For automations, actions list each with type and config. If the actions array is [['type'=>'create_esocial_s2299_draft', 'config'=>[...]]], then config will include 'to' and _default_automation_id plus the trigger? Let me look at executeAction to see how config is passed.
Actually the switch maps 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' => $this->executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft($config, $member, $context). The migration action config includes 'to' => flow_responsible etc. executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft doesn't read 'to' except in config 'responsible_id' not present, so it falls through to flow responsible. Fine.
Now, what about the config where the notification uses system_sender true and to company_member responsible->getId(). But how does executeNotify resolve 'company_member' recipient type by company_member_id? resolveRecipients in recipientContext includes config; config in the executeNotify call includes 'to' => company_member, 'company_member_id' => responsible->getId(). And the member context is offboarding flow member, whose user is the employee user. resolveRecipients presumably handles company_member_id -> get member by id -> user. OK.
Potential problem: If the responsible is not a User (no user account, e.g., member without linked user), notification user resolution may fail silently → no notif. Not necessarily.
Now, given system_sender true and the assistant conversation creation with getOrCreateAssistantConversation($user). In sendChatNotification, `$user` is the recipient (responsible). assistant conversation created for responsible. OK.
Now let's consider the semantics of `isDirectMessage` for offboarding notification: system_sender true bypasses to assistant conversation. Good.
Another possible bug: In the chat message for the employee flows (non-system), nothing changed. The new code changed the comment but only the system_sender branch. Previously, `$isPayrollSystemSender` required FlowInstanceMember source payroll. New `$isSystemSender` adds config check. No regression for existing.
But wait: is `$config['system_sender']` passed through executeSendEmail → sendChatForRecipientType → sendChatNotification? The emailConfig includes 'system_sender' => config['system_sender'] (added line 7050). Yes.
Now consider the scenario in which `messageHtml` includes a `<a href>` with review URL generated from route including query `?esocialTab=desligamento`. Router generate returns e.g. '/my-company/member/10?esocialTab=desligamento'. Wait, they append '?esocialTab=desligamento' manually after generate path. If route includes existing query? It doesn't. OK.
But the `my_company_member_manage` route is a POST form route (form action). It's also GET page probably (member manage page). Fine.
Now let's focus on a potential real functional bug in `OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService::applyPayload`: for `dtAvPrv` (dataConcessaoAviso), `dtProjFimApi`, etc., they apply `onlyEmptyFields` (not force overwrite) when updated; good. But note `applyPayloadValue` early-returns when `$value === null`, meaning payload values that are empty strings become null (stringOrNull etc.), and thus null values never clear existing fields. When re-executing the automation (update path) and payload becomes empty for some field (e.g., avisoPrevioIndenizado null/empty), the existing value is retained. Is that desired? For updates, yes preserve manual fields. But for a NEW event? On creation, applyPayload on a fresh event (no fields) only sets non-null payload values. Fields for which offboarding has no data remain null. OK.
But hold on — for a brand-new event, on creation, applyPayload($event, $payload, $onlyEmptyFields=false) sets all non-null fields; fine.
Potential subtle issue: the `dataDesligamento` is forced overwritten even when onlyEmptyFields true. That's per comment. OK.
Now, what about an existing manual draft (created via saveEventS2299) with mtvDeslig already filled ('07'), automation update passes new motivoDesligamento '02' from config? Actually payload motivoDesligamento from config default '' — meaning payload value null (stringOrNull('')). In reuse-pending-draft test, they pass config motivoDesligamento '02', payload non-null '02'; onlyEmptyFields true preserves mtv '07'. In real automation, the config (from YAML migration) has no motivoDesligamento. Payload motivo '' → null → skip. Good; manual preserved.
Now bigger picture: where does the S-2299 draft data come from? Config in migration only has 'to'. So payload uses offboardingMember reason? No; motivo from config default ''. So mostly only dataDesligamento and reason metadata. OK.
Now examine the test for `buildReviewUrl`. In service: `$path = $this->router ? $this->router->generate(...) : fallback; return $path . '?esocialTab=desligamento';` The test asserts '/my-company/member/10?esocialTab=desligamento'. Router mock generate returns '/my-company/member/10'. OK.
Now for real flow, router->generate('my_company_member_manage', ['member'=>id]) yields path '/my-company/member/10' plus possibly locale prefix? Symfony route might require _locale default '/'. Then they append '?esocialTab=desligamento'. Fine.
Let's now focus on `EsocialDataService` to see how percAliment is used to construct XML for S-2299, verifying no numeric formatting issue introduced by string values ("12.50"). Actually the code `$std->percaliment = $evento->getPercAliment();` then maybe XML uses (string). Fine.
Let me read around ESocialDataService lines 1060-1100 & 1310-1340.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 1100, "file_path": "src/Service/ESocialDataService.php", "start_line": 1040}
Result
File: src/Service/ESocialDataService.php (Total lines: 3725)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1040-1100
1040| }
1041|
1042| private function treatS2298Data(EsocialS2298EvtReintegr $evento): array
1043| {
1044| $std = new \stdClass();
1045| $std->modo = $evento->getModo() ?? 'INC';
1046|
1047| // TODO: Implementar lógica específica para S2298
1048|
1049| $configJson = $this->getConfigJson($evento);
1050| return [
1051| 'std' => $std,
1052| 'configJson' => $configJson
1053| ];
1054| }
1055|
1056| private function treatS2299Data(EsocialS2299EvtDeslig $evento): array
1057| {
1058| $std = new \stdClass();
1059| $std->modo = $evento->getModo() ?? 'INC';
1060|
1061| // Grupo ideEvento
1062| $std->indretif = $evento->getIndRetif();
1063| if ($evento->getIndRetif() == 2) {
1064| $std->nrrecibo = $evento->getNrRecibo();
1065| }
1066|
1067| // Grupo ideVinculo
1068| $std->cpftrab = preg_replace('/[^0-9]/', '', $evento->getCpfTrab());
1069| $std->matricula = $evento->getMatricula();
1070|
1071| // Grupo infoDeslig
1072| $std->mtvdeslig = $evento->getMtvDeslig();
1073| $std->dtdeslig = $evento->getDtDeslig() ? $evento->getDtDeslig()->format('Y-m-d') : null;
1074| $std->dtavprv = $evento->getDtAvPrv() ? $evento->getDtAvPrv()->format('Y-m-d') : null;
1075| $std->indpagtoapi = $evento->getIndPagtoAPI();
1076| $std->dtprojfimapi = $evento->getDtProjFimAPI() ? $evento->getDtProjFimAPI()->format('Y-m-d') : null;
1077| $std->pensalim = $evento->getPensAlim();
1078| $std->percaliment = $evento->getPercAliment();
1079| $std->vralim = $evento->getVrAlim();
1080|
1081| // Grupo sucessaoVinc (opcional)
1082| if ($evento->getSucessaoVinc()) {
1083| $sucessaoVinc = $evento->getSucessaoVinc();
1084| $std->sucessaovinc = new \stdClass();
1085| $std->sucessaovinc->tpinsc = $sucessaoVinc->getTpInsc();
1086| $std->sucessaovinc->nrinsc = $sucessaoVinc->getNrInsc();
1087| }
1088|
1089| // Grupo transfTit (opcional)
1090| if ($evento->getTransfTit()) {
1091| $transfTit = $evento->getTransfTit();
1092| $std->transftit = new \stdClass();
1093| $std->transftit->cpfsubstituto = preg_replace('/[^0-9]/', '', $transfTit->getCpfSubstituto());
1094| $std->transftit->dtnascto = $transfTit->getDtNascto() ? $transfTit->getDtNascto()->format('Y-m-d') : null;
1095| }
1096|
1097| $configJson = $this->getConfigJson($evento);
1098|
1099| return [
1100| 'std' => $std,
Request #29
deepseek-v4-flash
P:82.48K C:1.97K CR:81.41K CW:0
16187ms
Reasoning
Note: `treatS2299Data` takes `EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` — different class name? Wait, there's `EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` and `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento`? Let's check: earlier the repository for EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento. And this method takes `EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` (maybe an alias/legacy). Hmm search found at 1078 `$evento->getPercAliment()`. So this is a different entity also having percAliment? Possibly `EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` is the S2299 entity used in another context while EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento new? Two entities for S2299? Wait, we saw `EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino` also has percAliment. And there's `EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` presumably with ?int getters? Not in diff. This ESocialDataService method uses legacy entity not our changed one. Let me not go down this path; the changed entity is EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.
Let me now inspect how getPercAliment() of EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento is consumed elsewhere for XML generation - FlowableVariablesService at lines 19737-19793. Only returns as data. OK.
Now check the templates of flow decision system (they modified list_automations.html.twig and flow_detail.html.twig +1 lines). Those are outside review group.
Given only files in review group, I should focus review on these files.
Let me now analyze the new code for issues of style/correctness not previously flagged:
Potential issue: The metadata stored `esocialS2299Draft.payload` includes `member` (employee member id), plus sensitive personal data? Not sensitive. Payload contains motivo, dates, pensAlim etc. Fine.
Potential issue: In the new action, they use `$this->log('warning', ...)` etc. If logger null? AutomationExecutionService->log method handles null. Let's check the log method. Not needed.
Potential issue: `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` returns success false when responsible not found, and this error may show in the automation execution results but not fail the whole run. Fine.
Now let me inspect `executeAction` (dispatch) to ensure config argument equals the automation's action config for offboarding triggers, and that the config includes 'system_sender'? Wait the notification config sets system_sender true manually.
Let me now examine how actions' config flows into the new method: the automation config for create_esocial_s2299_draft from migration actionConfig has keys: to, _default_automation_id. In executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft, `$config['motivoDesligamento']` etc not provided; fine. payload includes reason? Only _offboarding info reason. And dataDesligamento from offboarding dismissal date. OK.
Potential issue: `dataDesligamento` is derived from dismissal date only at execution time; if dismissal date null then ''. Good.
Now let me look at how automation action triggers offboarding_completed vs on_enter: stage 3 has automation create_esocial_s2299_draft on_enter, plus create_processo_seletivo on_offboarding_complete. Both may exist. The esocial draft runs on entering stage 3 (Finalização), create_processo_seletivo when offboarding completes (likely exit of last stage). OK.
Now, let me check whether the trigger type 'on_enter' (employee_enters_stage) is in allowed_triggers for the action and the runtime: the AutomationExecutionService action dispatch executes 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' for any trigger... The YAML restricted UI choices only. Runtime doesn't check allowed triggers (this is normal for this system).
Now think about how a draft gets created when the member enters stage 3 of the workflow — does it have dismissal date? Usually offboarding finalization stage means exit date soon or passed. Payload may still be empty if no dismissal date set; then draft event created with dataDesligamento '' -> null. That's acceptable.
Now let me think about real bug: When esocialTrabalhador exists and remuneracao exists, but existing event from metadata is not pendente (i.e., official) → eventStatus existing_not_editable; they do NOT persist; then metadata updated. Good.
But there's an interesting bug: when eventStatus == existing_not_editable, they skip persist; but the code still calls `$event->setUpdatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable())`? No: they only set updatedAt inside `elseif ($event instanceof ... )` for pendente; for official event branch they set eventStatus only. Good.
Now, wait — confirmed issue #4: The classification of event as "official/not-editable" uses any status != 'pendente', including 'erro' states, which means a failed S-2299 (never sent) can't be corrected. That's confirmed. But we might add a related nuance? Already covered.
Let me check something: The second metadata block: They set metadata then persist member, flush; then if event found they update metadata eventId and flush again. But note that when eventStatus is existing_not_editable and event not null (official event), the metadata eventId is set to the official event id. That could mislead later when the flow member re-enters stage? findEventLinkedToOffboarding would load the official event and treat as existing_not_editable again (consistent). OK.
Now, examine the handling of when event is created: `$event->setDadosRemuneracao($remuneracao); applyPayload; persist($event)`. But createDraftEvent sets esocialTrabalhador and company; also sets status 'pendente', modo 'INC', indRetif 1. But it does not set 'modo' correctly? Actually createDraftEvent sets Modo INC. Good. But missing `setNrInscTransmissor`? It sets tpInscTransmissor and nrInscTransmissor. Same as saveEventS2299.
However, notice: createDraftEvent doesn't set `iniValid`/`perApur`/`fimValid` etc. saveEventS2299 also doesn't. OK consistent.
Potential bug: newly created event gets `$event->setCreatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable())`, but on later re-run (reusing pending draft) they call setUpdatedAt. OK.
Now, the review of the migration: another potential real problem — they seed into `flow_templates` a template with name equal to the product name maybe duplicates, but it uses seed_migration marker to guard.
Wait, something important in migration up: the `$this->ensureTemplate($companyId, $workflowId, [...])` query uses settings JSON_EXTRACT on flow_templates. If flow_templates.settings may be NULL or not JSON-valid for some rows, JSON_EXTRACT returns NULL fine.
Let me now review the interplay between migration 'workflow_product_was_created' and down logic: In up they compute $workflowProductExisted BEFORE ensureWorkflowProduct; pass to ensureTemplate. If template already existed (from prior partial run), ensureTemplate returns existing id without touching settings; so the rollback state stored in the original template creation stays as originally recorded (true if created then). OK.
Now let's look for any issue where ensureOffboardingStages adds duplicate activities in stage if the template already had 'Offboarding' activity of different type (e.g., with offboarding_activity_type_id set to something). ensureActivity checks only name='Offboarding' regardless of activity_type. If existing stage activity 'Offboarding' is a specific onboarding/offboarding activity type with config (icon), returning existing row is fine.
Potential problem: ensureActivity inserts activity_type 'activity' with config icon; but offboarding flows require activities to be linked to an OffboardingActivityType? If the runtime lists activities by offboarding_activity_type_id then template's generic activity 'Offboarding' may be wrong. This could be a functional issue in the seeded template: maybe offboarding templates use offboarding_activity_type_id referencing seeded activity types table (e.g., 'entrevista_de_desligamento', etc.). But we don't have evidence. Let me search how flow templates for offboarding currently create activities/automations in the app — check the service that applies product template defaults or 'moveToNextStage' etc. Actually a "ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier" exists (mentioned in setter injection). Let's see how offboarding template default structure created elsewhere. Search 'offboarding_activity_type_id'.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "offboarding_activity_type_id"}
Result
File: docs/offboarding-multiple-types-IMPLEMENTED.md
Match lines: 1
261|ADD COLUMN offboarding_activity_type_id INT NULL
File: migration_archive_20260508/Version20260305140000.php
Match lines: 6
12| * - flow_activities: onboarding_activity_type_id, offboarding_activity_type_id
27| // flow_activities: onboarding_activity_type_id, offboarding_activity_type_id
29| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE flow_activities ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS offboarding_activity_type_id INT DEFAULT NULL');
33| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE flow_activities ADD CONSTRAINT FK_FLOW_ACTIVITY_OFFBOARDING_TYPE FOREIGN KEY (offboarding_activity_type_id) REFERENCES offboarding_type_activity (id) ON DELETE SET NULL');
159| $exists = $conn->fetchOne("SELECT 1 FROM information_schema.COLUMNS WHERE TABLE_SCHEMA = DATABASE() AND TABLE_NAME = 'flow_activities' AND COLUMN_NAME = 'offboarding_activity_type_id'");
162| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE flow_activities DROP COLUMN offboarding_activity_type_id');
File: migration_archive_20260508/Version20260318120000.php
Match lines: 2
122| offboarding_activity_type_id INT DEFAULT NULL,
248| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE flow_activities ADD CONSTRAINT FK_FLOW_ACTIVITY_OFFBOARDING_TYPE FOREIGN KEY (offboarding_activity_type_id) REFERENCES offboarding_type_activity (id) ON DELETE SET NULL');
File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php
Match lines: 1
139| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_activities ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS offboarding_activity_type_id INT DEFAULT NULL');
File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
Match lines: 1
417| 'INSERT INTO flow_activities (flow_stage_id, name, activity_type, config, order_index, process_stage_type, onboarding_activity_type_id, offboarding_activity_type_id)
File: src/Repository/FlowActivityRepository.php
Match lines: 1
36| 'fa.offboardingActivityTypeId AS offboarding_activity_type_id',
File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowActivitySuggestionService.php
Match lines: 9
94| $offboardingTypeId = isset($activity['offboarding_activity_type_id']) ? (int) $activity['offboarding_activity_type_id'] : null;
137| if ((int) ($option['offboarding_activity_type_id'] ?? 0) === $offboardingTypeId) {
464| if (isset($activityData['offboarding_activity_type_id'])) {
465| $activity->setOffboardingActivityTypeId((int) $activityData['offboarding_activity_type_id']);
651| if (isset($option['offboarding_activity_type_id'])) {
652| return 'off:' . (int) $option['offboarding_activity_type_id'];
685| $offboardingTypeId = $row['offboarding_activity_type_id'] ?? null;
712| $candidate['offboarding_activity_type_id'] = (int) $offboardingTypeId;
787| 'offboarding_activity_type_id' => $typeActivity->getId(),
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "create_esocial_s2299_draft"}
Result
File: config/automations/offboarding.yaml
Match lines: 2
182| - id: "create_esocial_s2299_draft"
183| type: "create_esocial_s2299_draft"
File: docs/database-changes/2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template.md
Match lines: 4
19|- Inclui a automacao `create_esocial_s2299_draft` na etapa final.
32|1. Publicar o codigo com a action `create_esocial_s2299_draft` disponivel em `config/automations/offboarding.yaml`.
80| AND fa.action_type = 'create_esocial_s2299_draft';
96|- O fluxo depende da action `create_esocial_s2299_draft` estar disponivel no codigo antes da migration ser usada operacionalmente.
File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
Match lines: 2
331| 'actionType' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
338| 'type' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 1
512| 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' => $this->executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft($config, $member, $context),
File: templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig
Match lines: 1
532| 'create_esocial_s2299_draft': 'Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299)',
File: templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig
Match lines: 1
4078| 'create_esocial_s2299_draft': 'criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299)',
File: tests/Config/OffboardingAutomationConfigTest.php
Match lines: 3
19| if (($candidate['id'] ?? null) === 'create_esocial_s2299_draft') {
25| self::assertIsArray($action, 'Offboarding deve declarar a action create_esocial_s2299_draft.');
26| self::assertSame('create_esocial_s2299_draft', $action['type'] ?? null);
File: tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php
Match lines: 8
50| 'type' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
68| 'type' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
103| 'type' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
158| 'type' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
259| 'type' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
316| 'type' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
387| 'type' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
441| 'type' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
Request #30
deepseek-v4-flash
P:85.91K C:879 CR:84.35K CW:0
7551ms
Reasoning
Interesting: The migration seeds activities with `offboarding_activity_type_id` NULL but this column exists. Where do offboarding activity types come from? `offboarding_type_activity` table. Templates for offboarding might rely on activities having an offboarding type so the front can identify what to display (e.g., progress "offboardingMember activities progress"?). If the template seeded generic 'Offboarding' activity without offboarding activity type, maybe the flow still works but may show generic activity; users can customize. Not necessarily a bug.
Actually, wait — note the flow_automations insert includes column `fixed_stage_type` = NULL. That column may be for default flows. Not necessarily a bug.
Let me not overthink migration since the confirmed findings already cover the key issues there; plus the migration could contain other issues, but need precision.
Now, let me verify a functional cross-file issue: The new YAML action declares allowed_triggers only "employee_enters_stage". The migration seeds an automation with triggerType 'on_enter' — matches. But the seeded automation for stage 3 also seeds create_processo_seletivo with trigger on_offboarding_complete — that's for offboarding_completed trigger, whose action 'create_processo_seletivo' allowed triggers include offboarding_completed presumably. Fine.
Now, focus on one subtle real issue in `OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService::eventMatchesContext`: They compare entity IDs, but when the event is new and persisted with data... that's for metadata event id; existing event found via id. Fine.
Let me inspect the `decimalOrNull` function for percent vs value: For percAliment they strip '%' and 'R$'. For '12,50' → '12.50' → number_format(12.5, 2) '12.50'. For vrAlim 'R$ 1.500,00' → normalize removes R$, spaces → '1.500,00' → contains comma → removes dots: '1500,00' → '1500.00' → number_format(1500,2) = '1500.00'. Good.
But number_format on float may introduce rounding differences, acceptable.
Now, entity: `pensAlim` setter expects ?int. Payload pensAlim intOrNull handles int. Repository saveEventS2299 passes $data['pensAlim'] (string "1" or "") → non-strict coerces to int. '1' → 1. '' → 0? Wait `$data['pensAlim'] ?? null` when '' then setPensAlim('') => non-strict to int: '' → 0? Actually PHP coerces '' to 0 when cast to int in function parameter? For scalar type coercion with strict_types off, '' to int is 0. That existed before, not in diff. Skip.
Now, let me look deeper at the AutomationExecutionService's new code block: lines 14930-15180 to double-check details like the reason for `member_id` context to 'company_member_id', the message replacements (e.g., member_name may not be replaced for `company_member` recipient because context 'member_id' employee). Let's inspect the `replaceVariables` and how member name is derived (line 13329 etc.). If replacement uses the recipient user's member rather than the flow member employee, the message "O rascunho do S-2299 de {name}" would show responsible's name instead of the employee. Wait: The `$context` passed to executeNotify includes 'member_id' => companyMember->getId() (employee). `replaceVariables` reads context member info? Let me read replaceVariables around 13329.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 13410, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 13300}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15387)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 13300-13410
13300|
13301| default:
13302| // Tentar como ID de usuário
13303| if (is_numeric($recipientType)) {
13304| $user = $this->entityManager->getRepository(User::class)->find($recipientType);
13305| if ($user) {
13306| $users[] = $user;
13307| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found user by ID: " . $user->getEmail());
13308| }
13309| } else {
13310| error_log("⚠️ [resolveRecipients] Tipo de destinatário desconhecido: {$recipientType}");
13311| }
13312| }
13313|
13314| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Total de usuários encontrados: " . count($users));
13315|
13316| return $users;
13317| }
13318|
13319| /**
13320| * Substitui variáveis em uma string
13321| */
13322| private function replaceVariables(string $text, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): string
13323| {
13324| $completionPctFormatted = isset($context['completionPercentage'])
13325| ? number_format((float) $context['completionPercentage'], 0) . '%'
13326| : '';
13327|
13328| $replacements = [
13329| '{{member_name}}' => '',
13330| '{{member_email}}' => '',
13331| '{{stage_name}}' => '',
13332| '{{product_name}}' => '',
13333| '{{company_name}}' => '',
13334| '{{flow_instance_id}}' => '',
13335| '{{flow_instance_name}}' => '',
13336| '{{flow_template_name}}' => '',
13337| '{{kanban_card_title}}' => '',
13338| '{{completion_percentage}}' => $completionPctFormatted,
13339| '{{current_date}}' => (new \DateTime())->format('d/m/Y'),
13340| '{{current_time}}' => (new \DateTime())->format('H:i'),
13341| '{{assessment360_questionnaire_url}}' => '',
13342| '{{assessment360_questionnaire_button_html}}' => '',
13343| ];
13344|
13345| if ($member) {
13346| $user = $member->getUser();
13347| $companyMemberDirect = $member->getCompanyMember();
13348| $profile = $user?->getProfile();
13349|
13350| $fullName = '';
13351| if ($profile) {
13352| $fullName = trim($profile->getFirstName() . ' ' . $profile->getLastName());
13353| }
13354| if (empty($fullName) && $user) {
13355| $fullName = $user->getEmail() ?? '';
13356| }
13357| if (empty($fullName) && $companyMemberDirect) {
13358| $fullName = trim($companyMemberDirect->getFirstName() . ' ' . $companyMemberDirect->getLastName());
13359| if (empty($fullName)) {
13360| $fullName = $companyMemberDirect->getEmail() ?? '';
13361| }
13362| }
13363| if (empty($fullName)) {
13364| $crmEntity = $this->resolveCrmRecordEntityFromFlowMember($member);
13365| if ($crmEntity !== null) {
13366| if (method_exists($crmEntity, 'getNameLead')) {
13367| $fullName = trim((string) (($crmEntity->getNameLead() ?? '') . ' ' . ($crmEntity->getSurnameLead() ?? '')));
13368| } elseif (method_exists($crmEntity, 'getName')) {
13369| $fullName = trim((string) ($crmEntity->getName() ?? ''));
13370| }
13371| }
13372| }
13373| if (empty($fullName)) {
13374| $contextRecordName = trim((string) ($context['record_name'] ?? $context['member_name'] ?? ''));
13375| $fullName = $contextRecordName !== '' ? $contextRecordName : $this->resolveMemberDisplayName($member);
13376| }
13377|
13378| $memberEmail = $user?->getEmail() ?? $companyMemberDirect?->getEmail() ?? '';
13379|
13380| $replacements['{{member_name}}'] = $fullName;
13381| $replacements['{{member_email}}'] = $memberEmail;
13382|
13383| if ($member->getCurrentStage()) {
13384| $replacements['{{stage_name}}'] = $member->getCurrentStage()->getName();
13385| }
13386|
13387| if ($member->getProduct()) {
13388| $replacements['{{product_name}}'] = $member->getProduct()->getName();
13389| }
13390|
13391| $flowInstance = $member->getFlowInstance();
13392| if ($flowInstance) {
13393| $replacements['{{flow_instance_id}}'] = (string) $flowInstance->getId();
13394| $replacements['{{flow_instance_name}}'] = (string) ($flowInstance->getName() ?? '');
13395| $flowTemplate = $flowInstance->getFlowTemplate();
13396| if ($flowTemplate) {
13397| $replacements['{{flow_template_name}}'] = (string) $flowTemplate->getName();
13398| }
13399| if ($flowInstance->getCompany()) {
13400| $replacements['{{company_name}}'] = $flowInstance->getCompany()->getName();
13401| }
13402| }
13403| $replacements['{{kanban_card_title}}'] = $this->resolveFlowKanbanCardTitle($member);
13404|
13405| $a360QuestionnaireUrl = $this->resolveAssessment360BpmQuestionnaireUrl($member);
13406| $replacements['{{assessment360_questionnaire_url}}'] = $a360QuestionnaireUrl;
13407| $replacements['{{assessment360_questionnaire_button_html}}'] = $this->buildAssessment360QuestionnaireButtonHtml($a360QuestionnaireUrl);
13408| }
13409|
13410| // Adicionar variáveis do contexto
Request #31
deepseek-v4-flash
P:88.34K C:253 CR:86.78K CW:0
3147ms
Reasoning
The member_name replacement resolves from the flow member (the employee, since offboarding flow member user is the employee). Good.
Now let's read 13410-13460 to see the context override (maybe context member_name overrides), then the chat message html for system_sender may be the plain `$message` (not html). Wait in the chat message at line 13952, `$chatMessage->setMessage($fullMessage)` uses plain text. For the review button, they intended the "botão ver detalhes" abrindo o chat com a Adriana; inside chat, the message is plain text with instructions. Hmm the docs say review details in chat with Adriana. OK.
Let me read the rest of replaceVariables to see if context can override member_name.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 13480, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 13410}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15387)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 13410-13480
13410| // Adicionar variáveis do contexto
13411| foreach ($context as $key => $value) {
13412| if (is_scalar($value)) {
13413| $replacements['{{' . $key . '}}'] = $value;
13414| }
13415| }
13416|
13417| return str_replace(array_keys($replacements), array_values($replacements), $text);
13418| }
13419|
13420| /**
13421| * Resolve produtos de permissão usados para notificar gestores.
13422| *
13423| * Prioridades:
13424| * 1) Para produto assessment_welfare: SEMPRE welfare-assessment (permissão canEdit)
13425| * 2) Contexto/config da ação: manager_permission_products ou permission_products
13426| * 3) Fluxos assessment_* (exceto welfare) -> integrated-assessment
13427| * 4) Produto atual do membro
13428| */
13429| private function resolveManagerPermissionProductSlugs(FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
13430| {
13431| $memberProductSlug = $member->getProduct()?->getSlug() ?? '';
13432| if ($memberProductSlug === 'assessment_welfare'
13433| || $memberProductSlug === 'welfare-assessment'
13434| || $memberProductSlug === 'welfare_assessment') {
13435| return ['welfare-assessment'];
13436| }
13437|
13438| $configuredProducts = $context['manager_permission_products'] ?? $context['permission_products'] ?? null;
13439|
13440| if (is_string($configuredProducts)) {
13441| $configuredProducts = array_map('trim', explode(',', $configuredProducts));
13442| }
13443|
13444| if (is_array($configuredProducts)) {
13445| $configuredProducts = array_values(array_filter(array_map(
13446| static fn($slug) => is_string($slug) ? trim($slug) : '',
13447| $configuredProducts
13448| )));
13449| if (!empty($configuredProducts)) {
13450| return array_values(array_unique($configuredProducts));
13451| }
13452| }
13453|
13454| if ($memberProductSlug === '') {
13455| return [];
13456| }
13457|
13458| if (str_starts_with($memberProductSlug, 'assessment_')) {
13459| return ['integrated-assessment'];
13460| }
13461|
13462| return [$memberProductSlug];
13463| }
13464|
13465| /**
13466| * Regra reutilizável para destinatários "manager":
13467| * - canEdit=true e teamLimitation=false -> notifica
13468| * - canEdit=true e teamLimitation=true -> notifica apenas se compartilhar time
13469| *
13470| * @param string[] $productSlugs
13471| * @return User[]
13472| */
13473| private function resolveManagersByProductPermissions(FlowInstanceMember $member, array $productSlugs): array
13474| {
13475| if (empty($productSlugs) || !$this->memberPermissionService) {
13476| return [];
13477| }
13478|
13479| $flowInstance = $member->getFlowInstance();
13480| $company = $flowInstance?->getCompany();
Request #32
deepseek-v4-flash
P:89.47K C:500 CR:88.58K CW:0
4680ms
Reasoning
Context member_name overriding not needed.
Now let me focus on something specific in the new action code: It uses a route to generate the review URL but `sendChatNotification` and others. Fine.
Let's read the actual new action code fully in the file, lines 14930-15170, to re-examine details (some may be cut by diff). Actually I already have the diff content for the new method, that's sufficient.
Let me now think about more subtle, but important functional bugs in the new code:
Bug candidate 1: In `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, when `$esocialTrabalhador` is missing or `$remuneracao` missing, `$event` is null and `$eventStatus` stays 'draft_only'. Notification message uses missing data title. But consider missing list only esocial_worker_data because the EsocialDadosTrabalhador find returned null. Note `esocialTrabalhador` may not be found because `findOneBy(['companyMember' => $companyMember])`. However, it's possible EsocialDadosTrabalhador associates with user? Let's check EsocialDadosTrabalhador relation and how other code finds it for a companyMember. There may be multiple EsocialDadosTrabalhador rows for a member (historical). findOneBy returns first. OK.
Bug candidate 2: The `executeNotify` call passes `'to' => 'company_member', 'company_member_id' => (string) $responsible->getId()`. Look at resolveRecipients handling for 'company_member' recipient type: does it accept company_member_id? Let me verify that the recipient resolution of company_member in context uses company_member_id to find the member by ID, then get user. If responsible is company member with no user (null), then no user? It should still resolve via member. Let me read resolveRecipients for 'company_member'.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "private function resolveRecipients"}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 1 12934| private function resolveRecipients(string $recipientType, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
Request #33
deepseek-v4-flash
P:90.03K C:90 CR:89.86K CW:0
1460ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 13180, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 12934}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15387)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 12934-13180
12934| private function resolveRecipients(string $recipientType, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
12935| {
12936| $users = [];
12937|
12938| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] recipientType: {$recipientType}, member: " . ($member ? $member->getId() : 'NULL'));
12939|
12940| switch ($recipientType) {
12941| case 'candidate':
12942| case 'member':
12943| case 'employee':
12944| case 'collaborator':
12945| // Candidato / Colaborador (processo seletivo, onboarding, offboarding)
12946| if ($member) {
12947| if ($member->getUser()) {
12948| $users[] = $member->getUser();
12949| }
12950| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found candidate/member/employee: " . ($member->getUser()?->getEmail() ?? $member->getCompanyMember()?->getEmail() ?? 'sem-email'));
12951| }
12952| break;
12953|
12954| case 'record_owner':
12955| if ($member) {
12956| $emails = $this->getCrmRecordOwnerEmails($member);
12957| $emails = is_array($emails) ? $emails : (empty($emails) ? [] : [$emails]);
12958| foreach ($emails as $email) {
12959| $email = trim((string) $email);
12960| if ($email === '') {
12961| continue;
12962| }
12963| $user = $this->entityManager->getRepository(User::class)->findOneBy(['email' => $email]);
12964| if ($user) {
12965| $users[] = $user;
12966| }
12967| }
12968| }
12969| break;
12970|
12971| case 'board_owner':
12972| if ($member) {
12973| $emails = $this->getCrmBoardOwnerEmails($member);
12974| $emails = is_array($emails) ? $emails : (empty($emails) ? [] : [$emails]);
12975| foreach ($emails as $email) {
12976| $email = trim((string) $email);
12977| if ($email === '') {
12978| continue;
12979| }
12980| $user = $this->entityManager->getRepository(User::class)->findOneBy(['email' => $email]);
12981| if ($user) {
12982| $users[] = $user;
12983| }
12984| }
12985| }
12986| break;
12987|
12988| case 'responsible':
12989| // Buscar responsável por produto
12990| if ($member) {
12991| $sourceType = $member->getSourceType();
12992| $sourceId = $member->getSourceId();
12993|
12994| if ($sourceType === 'process' && $sourceId) {
12995| // Processo seletivo: Process.responsible
12996| $process = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\Process::class)
12997| ->find($sourceId);
12998|
12999| if ($process) {
13000| $responsible = $process->getResponsible();
13001| if ($responsible) {
13002| $users[] = $responsible;
13003| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found responsible from Process: " . $responsible->getEmail());
13004| } else {
13005| error_log("⚠️ [resolveRecipients] Process {$process->getId()} não tem responsável definido!");
13006| }
13007| }
13008| } elseif (in_array($sourceType, ['training_participant', 'training_group'], true)) {
13009| // Treinamentos: responsáveis do grupo de treinamento (Process.responsible + responsibles)
13010| $meta = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? [];
13011| $trainingProcessId = (int) ($meta['processId'] ?? $sourceId ?? 0);
13012| if ($trainingProcessId > 0) {
13013| $trainingProcess = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\Process::class)->find($trainingProcessId);
13014| if ($trainingProcess) {
13015| $seen = [];
13016| $primary = $trainingProcess->getResponsible();
13017| if ($primary) {
13018| $seen[$primary->getId()] = true;
13019| $users[] = $primary;
13020| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found training responsible (primary): " . $primary->getEmail());
13021| }
13022| foreach ($trainingProcess->getResponsibles() as $resp) {
13023| if (!isset($seen[$resp->getId()])) {
13024| $seen[$resp->getId()] = true;
13025| $users[] = $resp;
13026| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found training responsible (extra): " . $resp->getEmail());
13027| }
13028| }
13029| if (empty($users)) {
13030| error_log("⚠️ [resolveRecipients] responsible/training: nenhum responsável no Process #{$trainingProcessId}");
13031| }
13032| }
13033| }
13034| } elseif ($sourceType === 'offboarding' && $sourceId) {
13035| // Offboarding: buscar ROLE_MANAGER da empresa
13036| $responsibleEmail = $this->getResponsibleEmail($member);
13037| if ($responsibleEmail) {
13038| $emails = is_array($responsibleEmail) ? $responsibleEmail : [$responsibleEmail];
13039| foreach ($emails as $email) {
13040| $user = $this->entityManager->getRepository(User::class)->findOneBy(['email' => $email]);
13041| if ($user) {
13042| $users[] = $user;
13043| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found responsible for offboarding: " . $user->getEmail());
13044| }
13045| }
13046| }
13047| } elseif ($sourceType === 'onboarding' && $sourceId) {
13048| // Onboarding: buscar ROLE_MANAGER da empresa
13049| $responsibleEmail = $this->getResponsibleEmail($member);
13050| if ($responsibleEmail) {
13051| $emails = is_array($responsibleEmail) ? $responsibleEmail : [$responsibleEmail];
13052| foreach ($emails as $email) {
13053| $user = $this->entityManager->getRepository(User::class)->findOneBy(['email' => $email]);
13054| if ($user) {
13055| $users[] = $user;
13056| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found responsible for onboarding: " . $user->getEmail());
13057| }
13058| }
13059| }
13060| } else {
13061| error_log("⚠️ [resolveRecipients] Member não está vinculado a um produto conhecido (sourceType: " . ($member->getSourceType() ?? 'NULL') . ")");
13062| }
13063| }
13064| break;
13065|
13066| case 'flow_responsible':
13067| // Buscar responsável do fluxo por produto
13068| if ($member) {
13069| $flowRespEmail = $this->getFlowResponsibleEmail($member);
13070| if ($flowRespEmail) {
13071| $emails = is_array($flowRespEmail) ? $flowRespEmail : [$flowRespEmail];
13072| foreach ($emails as $email) {
13073| $user = $this->entityManager->getRepository(User::class)->findOneBy(['email' => $email]);
13074| if ($user) {
13075| $users[] = $user;
13076| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found flow_responsible: " . $user->getEmail());
13077| }
13078| }
13079| }
13080| }
13081| break;
13082|
13083| case 'interviewer':
13084| // Buscar entrevistador do processo seletivo
13085| if ($member && $member->getSourceType() === 'process' && $member->getSourceId()) {
13086| $process = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\Process::class)
13087| ->find($member->getSourceId());
13088|
13089| if ($process && $process->getInterviewer()) {
13090| $users[] = $process->getInterviewer();
13091| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found interviewer: " . $process->getInterviewer()->getEmail());
13092| }
13093| }
13094| break;
13095|
13096| case 'monitored_evaluator':
13097| // Buscar avaliador monitorado
13098| // TODO: Implementar lógica específica se necessário
13099| error_log("⚠️ [resolveRecipients] monitored_evaluator ainda não implementado");
13100| break;
13101|
13102| case 'company_member':
13103| // Buscar membro específico da empresa pelo ID na config.
13104| // Fallback: quando não houver ID explícito, usar o próprio membro do fluxo.
13105| if (isset($context['company_member_id'])) {
13106| $companyMemberId = $context['company_member_id'];
13107| $companyMember = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\CompanyMembers::class)
13108| ->find($companyMemberId);
13109|
13110| if ($companyMember && $companyMember->getUser()) {
13111| $users[] = $companyMember->getUser();
13112| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found company_member: " . $companyMember->getUser()->getEmail());
13113| }
13114| } elseif ($member) {
13115| if ($member->getUser()) {
13116| $users[] = $member->getUser();
13117| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Fallback company_member via FlowInstanceMember->getUser(): " . $member->getUser()->getEmail());
13118| } elseif ($member->getCompanyMember() && $member->getCompanyMember()->getUser()) {
13119| $users[] = $member->getCompanyMember()->getUser();
13120| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Fallback company_member via FlowInstanceMember->getCompanyMember(): " . $member->getCompanyMember()->getUser()->getEmail());
13121| }
13122| }
13123| break;
13124|
13125| case 'manager':
13126| // Apenas gestores por permissão canEdit/teamLimitation dos produtos alvo (sem fallback para administradores/ROLE_MANAGER)
13127| if ($member) {
13128| $permissionProducts = $this->resolveManagerPermissionProductSlugs($member, $context);
13129| $users = $this->resolveManagersByProductPermissions($member, $permissionProducts);
13130| if (empty($users)) {
13131| error_log("⚠️ [resolveRecipients] Manager não encontrado para member {$member->getId()} (nenhum usuário com permissão canEdit nos produtos)");
13132| }
13133| }
13134| break;
13135|
13136| case 'direct_manager':
13137| // Gestor direto do membro (superior no organograma)
13138| if ($member) {
13139| $managerEmails = $this->getManagerEmail($member);
13140| $emails = is_array($managerEmails)
13141| ? array_filter($managerEmails)
13142| : (empty($managerEmails) ? [] : [$managerEmails]);
13143|
13144| foreach ($emails as $email) {
13145| $email = trim((string) $email);
13146| if ($email === '') {
13147| continue;
13148| }
13149| $managerUser = $this->entityManager->getRepository(User::class)->findOneBy(['email' => $email]);
13150| if ($managerUser) {
13151| $users[] = $managerUser;
13152| }
13153| }
13154|
13155| if (empty($users)) {
13156| error_log("⚠️ [resolveRecipients] Gestor direto não encontrado para member {$member->getId()}");
13157| }
13158| }
13159| break;
13160|
13161| case 'goal_responsible':
13162| // Responsável da meta PDI (do GoalPdi)
13163| if ($member) {
13164| $goalRespEmail = $this->getGoalResponsibleEmail($member);
13165| if ($goalRespEmail) {
13166| $emails = is_array($goalRespEmail) ? $goalRespEmail : [$goalRespEmail];
13167| foreach ($emails as $email) {
13168| $email = trim((string) $email);
13169| if ($email === '') {
13170| continue;
13171| }
13172| $user = $this->entityManager->getRepository(User::class)->findOneBy(['email' => $email]);
13173| if ($user) {
13174| $users[] = $user;
13175| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found goal_responsible: " . $user->getEmail());
13176| }
13177| }
13178| }
13179|
13180| if (empty($users)) {
Request #34
deepseek-v4-flash
P:93.48K C:488 CR:90.11K CW:0
4875ms
Reasoning
Interesting: In resolveRecipients case 'company_member', if the responsible member does not have a user (`$companyMember->getUser()` null), no users are added → no notification/email/chat sent at all, but the automation still returns success with 'notification' => ['notified' => 0...]. Wait, but the test passes even without user for responsible? In the first test (worker missing), the responsible user email null; In the fixture responsibleUser set on responsibleMember so get user exists. OK.
Also note: company member in offboarding flows may have a user null but the responsible might be a manager user; not necessarily a company member with user. But given they resolve via CompanyMembers, the responsible must be a CompanyMembers record (not raw user). OK.
Now, but wait — the notification for 'company_member' case uses context company_member_id; they pass responsible->getId(). It's a CompanyMembers id.
Now, consider the cross-company isolation requirement in this new action: responsible resolution requires responsible->company matches flowCompany. Also employee member from offboarding. Company events creation uses company from flow instance. OK.
Now, one more potential issue: The offboarding draft payload includes `responsible` data for audit; fine.
Now let's examine whether member_sourceType 'offboarding' + no esocial mode -> skip. OK.
Let me now think about the type change regression risk more concretely: `getPercAliment`/`getVrAlim` changed from ?int to ?string; but `EsocialDataService::treatS2299Data` uses `EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` — different class. Where is `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` used to generate XML? There's likely another mapping path in ESocialDataService with method accepting EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento. Let me search to see how events of the EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento class are transformed into XML, and whether percAliment value formatting matters (e.g., they multiply?).
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento"}
Result
File: docs/Flowable/Tasks/formatters/esocial_s2299_campos_disponiveis.md
Match lines: 2
1|# Campos Disponíveis: EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento (S-2299)
4|`EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::getFlowableDataForTemplate(int $eventId): ?array`
File: docs/Flowable/Tasks/formatters/groups/ESOCIAL_ENTIDADES_DISPONIVEIS.md
Match lines: 1
67|| `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` | `getEsocialS2299Variables($eventId)` | S-2299 | ✅ Implementado |
File: src/Controller/CompanyController.php
Match lines: 3
34|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
6373| } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $event->getEsocialTrabalhador() !== null) {
6818| 'EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento' => 'Desligamento',
File: src/Controller/CompanyMemberController.php
Match lines: 3
72|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
548| $event = $em->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)->saveEventS2299($esocialTrabalhador, $data, $company, $remuneracao);
766| $blockingS2299 = $em->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)->findOneBy([
File: src/Controller/EsocialEventsController.php
Match lines: 1
25|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
File: src/Entity/EsocialEvents.php
Match lines: 2
31|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
66| * "s2299" = "EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento",
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
Match lines: 3
5|use App\Repository\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository;
9| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass=EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::class)
11|class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento extends EsocialEvents
File: src/Repository/EsocialDadosTrabalhadorRepository.php
Match lines: 2
840| $s2299Events = $em->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
1062| $s2299Events = $em->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2298EvtReintegrRepository.php
Match lines: 2
7|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
123| ->from(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class, 'd')
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
Match lines: 15
5|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
12| * @extends ServiceEntityRepository<EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento>
14| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento|null find($id, $lockMode = null, $lockVersion = null)
15| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento|null findOneBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null)
16| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[] findAll()
17| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[] findBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null, $limit = null, $offset = null)
19|class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository extends ServiceEntityRepository
23| parent::__construct($registry, EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class);
30| public function add(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $entity, bool $flush = true): void
42| public function remove(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $entity, bool $flush = true): void
63| public function saveEventS2299($esocialDadosTrabalhador, $data, $company, $dadosRemuneracao): EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
65| $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
102| * @param int $eventId ID do evento (EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento)
268| // * @return EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[] Returns an array of EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento objects
285| public function findOneBySomeField($value): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 7
40|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
14992| if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $event->getStatus() !== 'pendente') {
14994| } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
14999| if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
15005| if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
15045| if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
15095| 'message' => $event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable'
File: src/Service/FlowableServices/FlowableVariablesService.php
Match lines: 7
15168| * Template: EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento (S-2299 - Desligamento)
15174| * @param int $eventId ID do evento (EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento)
15179| $repository = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class);
18943| \App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class => ['s2299', 'Desligamento'],
19097| \App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class => ['s2299', 'Desligamento'],
19326| \App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class => ['s2299', 'Desligamento'],
19700| $s2299Repo = $em->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class);
File: src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php
Match lines: 12
11|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
35| public function createDraftEvent(Company $company, EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador): EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
37| $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
60| public function applyPayload(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $event, array $payload, bool $onlyEmptyFields = false): void
144| ): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento {
160| ->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
163| if (!$event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
177| ): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento {
183| ->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
215| ): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento {
217| ->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
249| EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $event,
File: templates/company/esocial_member.html.twig
Match lines: 1
154| 'desligamento_tab': 'EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento',
File: tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php
Match lines: 18
14|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
22|use App\Repository\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository;
120| self::assertCount(0, array_filter($persisted, static fn (object $item): bool => $item instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento));
179| $event = $this->firstPersisted($persisted, EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class);
180| self::assertInstanceOf(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class, $event);
220| $existingEvent = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
281| $pendingDraft = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
330| array_filter($persisted, static fn (object $item): bool => $item instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $item->getId() === 9001)
348| $existingEvent = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
408| $officialEvent = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
453| $this->firstPersisted($persisted, EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class),
467| ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $existingEvent,
469| ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $officialEvent = null,
470| ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $pendingDraftEvent = null
483| $s2299Repo = $this->createMock(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::class);
485| static fn (int $id): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento => $existingEvent && $id === $existingEvent->getId() ? $existingEvent : null
538| EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class => $s2299Repo,
547| if ($entity instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $entity->getId() === null) {
Request #35
deepseek-v4-flash
P:96.32K C:821 CR:93.95K CW:0
7536ms
Reasoning
Let me check the CompanyMemberController's call site around line 548 to see how percAliment / vrAlim data are provided (probably from a form) and the type handling with setPercAliment new signature (string), since if the controller passes numeric from request body it could be int/float - fine.
But importantly, what about CompanyMemberController line 548 with data sanitization? Let's check. And also check `EsocialEvents` and the XML builder for the S2299 event to see how percAliment is serialized. Perhaps `ESocialDataService::treatS2299Data` with `EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` is not the entity here. Let's find where EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento events are sent (ESocialEnvioService?) The EsocialEvents has discriminators "s2299" => EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento. The XML generator likely calls ESocialDataService with the parent type. Let me search treatS2299Data callers or sendS2299.
Actually, to keep the review within scope and time, let me search for how `getPercAliment` results are used for building XML payloads for the "EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento" path, specifically whether they expect string numeric with comma or decimal. Might not matter.
Let me instead check whether there's code that compares getPercAliment() to int or does arithmetic. Search for percAliment across code (excluding those found). Already found usages in services mainly pass-through. Also FlowableVariablesService, uses getPercAliment and formats into template data, probably as string. That's fine.
I think the entity change is a fix; not a regression per se. But let me check whether the setter previously typed ?int is used in a context with integer arithmetic expectations, e.g., template "prevEvts" fields... not needed.
Now let's examine the `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::saveEventS2299` and setIndPagtoApi code change again. It's a one-liner fix; but there might be a subtle bug: `$data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] !== ''` with value `null` handled by isset. With false, `false !== ''` is true, then `false ? 'S':'N'` = 'N'. Previously `false ? 'S' : 'N'` = N too. When `'0'`? true? '0' is not '' so '0'? 'S':'N' → 'N'. Wait `$data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N'` with '0' → 'N'; same. When 'S' → 'S'. OK good.
Now migration. Let me quickly verify flow_templates columns 'template_category' and other inserted columns exist and typical values. In Version20260518151423, they inserted into flow_stages without product_slot_index but with product_id NULL; but here they insert product_id = offboarding product id. This suggests per-product templates? flow_template_products with template_type 'fixo', order 0, slot_index 0. Let's search for flow_template_products insert elsewhere for the offboarding 'fluxo-de-saida' template or any seeding to compare 'template_type' values.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "INSERT INTO flow_template_products"}
Result
File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php Match lines: 3 667| 'INSERT INTO flow_template_products (flow_template_id, product_id, order_index, template_type, slot_index) 1268| 'INSERT INTO flow_template_products (flow_template_id, product_id, order_index, template_type, slot_index) 1345| 'INSERT INTO flow_template_products (flow_template_id, product_id, order_index, template_type, slot_index) File: migrations/Version20260519173602.php Match lines: 1 150| 'INSERT INTO flow_template_products (flow_template_id, product_id, order_index, template_type, slot_index) File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php Match lines: 1 265| 'INSERT INTO flow_template_products (flow_template_id, product_id, order_index, template_type, slot_index)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "template_type.*fixo", "use_perl_regexp": true}
Result
File: docs/Adriana/ADRIANA_ONBOARDING_INSTANCIAS_IA.md
Match lines: 1
258| "template_type": "fixo",
File: docs/database-changes/2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template.md
Match lines: 1
17|- Vincula o produto ao template com `template_type = 'fixo'`.
File: migration_archive_20260508/Version20260305130000.php
Match lines: 1
23| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE flow_template_products ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS template_type VARCHAR(20) DEFAULT \'fixo\'');
File: migration_archive_20260508/Version20260318120000.php
Match lines: 2
89| template_type VARCHAR(20) DEFAULT \'fixo\',
155| $this->addSql("ALTER TABLE flow_template_products ADD COLUMN template_type VARCHAR(20) DEFAULT 'fixo'");
File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php
Match lines: 1
127| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_template_products ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS template_type VARCHAR(20) DEFAULT \'fixo\'');
File: migrations/Version20260519173602.php
Match lines: 1
142| SET order_index = :orderIndex, template_type = \'fixo\'
File: src/Service/Adriana/DraftMapper.php
Match lines: 1
251| 'template_type' => strtolower(trim((string) ($templateProduct->getTemplateType() ?? 'fixo'))) ?: 'fixo',
File: src/Service/Adriana/Instance/Product/CrmInstanceHandler.php
Match lines: 1
92| $templateType = (string) ($fields['template_type'] ?? 'fixo');
File: src/Service/Adriana/Instance/Product/OffboardingInstanceHandler.php
Match lines: 2
80| $templateType = (string) ($fields['template_type'] ?? 'fixo');
117| return (string) ($fields['template_type'] ?? 'fixo') === 'variavel'
File: src/Service/Adriana/Instance/Product/OnboardingInstanceHandler.php
Match lines: 2
80| $templateType = (string) ($fields['template_type'] ?? 'fixo');
124| $templateType = (string) ($fields['template_type'] ?? 'fixo');
File: src/Service/Adriana/Instance/Product/SelectionProcessInstanceHandler.php
Match lines: 2
199| $isVariableTemplate = (string) ($fields['template_type'] ?? 'fixo') === 'variavel';
225| if ((string) ($fields['template_type'] ?? 'fixo') === 'variavel') {
File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowActivitySuggestionService.php
Match lines: 1
43| 'only_for_template_type' => 'fixo',
File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowApprovedPayrollFlowTemplateEnricher.php
Match lines: 1
52| 'template_type' => 'fixo',
File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowApprovedProcessoSeletivoEnricher.php
Match lines: 1
107| 'template_type' => 'fixo',
File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowConversationOrchestratorService.php
Match lines: 15
1801| . ' Nunca preencha state_updates.product_template_types: o sistema coleta fixo/variavel separadamente para cada produto.'
1961| 'slots' => ['product_template_types' => array_fill_keys(array_keys($updates['activity_suggestions']), 'fixo')],
4283| if ((string) ($fields['template_type'] ?? 'fixo') === 'variavel') {
4895| $templateType = $this->normalizeCrmTemplateType((string) ($fields['template_type'] ?? 'fixo'));
5000| $suggestedType = $this->normalizeCrmTemplateType((string) ($suggested['template_type'] ?? $fields['template_type'] ?? 'fixo'));
5029| if ((string) ($suggested['template_type'] ?? $existingFields['template_type'] ?? 'fixo') === 'variavel') {
5981| if ((string) ($fields['template_type'] ?? 'fixo') !== 'variavel') {
6030| if ((string) ($fields['template_type'] ?? 'fixo') !== 'variavel') {
7864| return (string) ($product['template_type'] ?? 'fixo') === 'variavel';
7888| return (string) ($product['template_type'] ?? 'fixo') === 'variavel';
7893| return (string) ($fields['template_type'] ?? 'fixo') === 'variavel';
7904| return (string) ($product['template_type'] ?? 'fixo') === 'variavel';
7909| return (string) ($fields['template_type'] ?? 'fixo') === 'variavel';
7937| if ($slug === 'processo_seletivo' && (string) ($fields['template_type'] ?? 'fixo') === 'variavel') {
8175| $templateType = (string) ($fields['template_type'] ?? 'fixo');
File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowInstancePlannerService.php
Match lines: 6
86| 'template_type' => (string) ($templateProduct->getTemplateType() ?? 'fixo'),
106| 'template_type' => 'fixo',
239| 'template_type' => (string) ($templateProduct->getTemplateType() ?? 'fixo'),
254| 'template_type' => (string) ($templateProduct->getTemplateType() ?? 'fixo'),
275| 'template_type' => (string) ($templateProduct->getTemplateType() ?? 'fixo'),
288| 'template_type' => (string) ($templateProduct->getTemplateType() ?? 'fixo'),
File: tests/Service/Adriana/WorkflowAiPipelineTest.php
Match lines: 29
337| $this->assertNull($method->invoke($applier, ['orchestrator_template_type' => 'fixo']));
865| ['slug' => 'processo_seletivo', 'template_type' => 'fixo', 'slot_index' => 0],
866| ['slug' => 'onboarding', 'template_type' => 'fixo', 'slot_index' => 1],
878| 'template_type' => 'fixo',
892| 'template_type' => 'fixo',
980| ['slug' => 'jornada_metahuman', 'template_type' => 'fixo', 'slot_index' => 0],
981| ['slug' => 'assessment-360', 'template_type' => 'fixo', 'slot_index' => 0],
2189| ['slug' => 'onboarding', 'template_type' => 'fixo'],
2245| ['slug' => 'onboarding', 'template_type' => 'fixo'],
2275| ['slug' => 'offboarding', 'template_type' => 'fixo'],
2289| 'template_type' => 'fixo',
2346| 'template_type' => 'fixo',
2381| ['slug' => 'crm', 'template_type' => 'fixo'],
2391| 'template_type' => 'fixo',
2433| 'template_type' => 'fixo',
2498| 'template_type' => 'fixo',
2584| 'template_type' => 'fixo',
3097| 'template_type' => 'fixo',
3203| 'template_type' => 'fixo',
3237| 'template_type' => 'fixo',
3250| 'template_type' => 'fixo',
4025| ['slug' => 'nps-com-ia', 'template_type' => 'fixo'],
4051| ['slug' => 'crm', 'template_type' => 'fixo'],
4052| ['slug' => 'nps-com-ia', 'template_type' => 'fixo'],
4244| 'template_type' => 'fixo',
4348| ['slug' => 'onboarding', 'template_type' => 'fixo'],
4392| 'template_type' => 'fixo',
4596| 'template_type' => 'fixo',
4639| 'template_type' => 'fixo',
File: tests/Unit/Product/TextToBpmn/WorkflowDraftExportSyncServiceTest.php
Match lines: 1
132| ->setSettings(array_merge($template->getSettings() ?? [], ['template_type' => 'fixo']));
Request #36
deepseek-v4-flash
P:99.34K C:956 CR:97.02K CW:0
9114ms
Reasoning
The migration's convention looks aligned with similar seeds. Given the confirmed findings on migration already cover the key flaw (down not cleaning stages/automations/duplicating on re-up) I'll not re-report migration.
But let me still double-check: Migration down() also leaves active stage automation seeded across other templates? Fine.
Let's re-verify the logic bug possibility in up() regarding `workflow_products` order/insertion with `order_index 0`: if there are multiple eligible workflows for one company... each workflow has own row; fine.
Let me think about another possible NEW finding for migration not yet flagged: The up() only seeds when a company is "elegible", but the eligibility SQL includes companies with NO service_package (legacy) — mirroring hasPackageFeature behavior. But what about plan_features existing but with has_access 0 or missing row entirely? For company with service_package that is active but missing plan_features row for feature_key 'offboarding', the EXISTS for plan_features is false → not eligible → company skipped. Mirrors "exige plan_features.has_access=1".
However, consider company with service_package that is INACTIVE (is_active=0) → NOT eligible (blocked). But mirrors comment: "pacote inativo => bloqueado". Good.
Also note workflowRows filters workflows by slug 'fluxo-de-saida' regardless of product. But if company not using offboarding product? eligibility ensures.
Potential issue: They also add workflow_products link (product offboarding) for all eligible companies that have a 'fluxo-de-saida' workflow, even those without any previous offboarding product usage and regardless of template_category etc. That creates a product link → maybe product managers expect flow templates created per company by a manual "Gerar template padrão" process? Hard to know.
Given the massive confirmed findings, my remaining job: find NEW real issues.
Let me examine the interaction between the new action and triggers: The YAML says action only allowed on employee_enters_stage. In the seeded template, the action is attached with on_enter at the last stage. Fine.
But wait — there is a subtle conflict: The YAML declares `blocked_triggers` that includes 'offboarding_completed' etc. Yet the migration seeds automation `Criar Processo Seletivo ao concluir offboarding` with trigger on_offboarding_complete + action type create_processo_seletivo. That's fine; different action.
Let me verify the actual mapping of trigger "employee_enters_stage" to runtime: config trigger id 'employee_enters_stage' type 'on_enter'. In migration conditions/actions arrays they use type 'on_enter'. And ensureAutomation trigger_type 'on_enter'. Consistent.
Now, a subtle issue in the automation DB seed: automation `actions` array with actions[0] type create_esocial_s2299_draft config contains 'to' and '_default_automation_id'. But the executor's executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft uses `$config` from executeAction; need to see how executeAction maps the automation's action to its config. Let me examine executeAction signature & action config parsing to ensure the executor passes each action's config as $config and that `$config['responsible_id']` lookups read from actions config. But since no responsible_id config is provided, resolution will use flow responsible. There may be a mismatch in YAML config_preset 'to' => flow_responsible never used by the executor. Not a functional bug though: action executes; the notification always to the responsible derived. If 'to' config is required by other machinery (e.g., the front expects config_preset to prefill form), it's only UI hint.
Let me now examine `executeAction` dispatch signature & whether `$config` in executeAction is actions entry config with keys like 'system_sender'? Actually in executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft, they call executeNotify separately with explicit system_sender. So `$config` isn't passed for that.
Let's now check that `executeAction` calls with $config = maybe whole action? Let me read executeAction.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "public function executeAction"}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 1 423| public function executeAction(array $action, ?FlowInstanceMember $member = null, array $context = []): array
Request #37
deepseek-v4-flash
P:100.36K C:88 CR:100.22K CW:0
1703ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 560, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 423}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15387)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 423-560
423| public function executeAction(array $action, ?FlowInstanceMember $member = null, array $context = []): array
424| {
425| $type = $action['type'] ?? '';
426| $config = $action['config'] ?? [];
427|
428| // Log para debug
429| error_log("[DEBUG] executeAction - type: {$type}, config: " . json_encode($config));
430|
431| // Metadado aditivo: permite que handlers compartilhados (ex.: executeMoveToStage)
432| // saibam o tipo de ação de origem sem alterar o comportamento existente.
433| $context['_action_type'] = (string) $type;
434|
435| return match ($type) {
436| // Tipos básicos de email
437| 'send_email' => $this->executeSendEmail($config, $member, $context),
438| 'email' => $this->executeSendEmail($config, $member, $context),
439|
440| // Tipos específicos de notificação por destinatário (IDs do YAML)
441| 'send_email_candidate' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'candidate'], $config), $member, $context),
442| 'send_email_interviewer' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'interviewer'], $config), $member, $context),
443| 'send_email_monitored_evaluator' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'monitored_evaluator'], $config), $member, $context),
444| 'send_email_employee' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'employee'], $config), $member, $context),
445| 'send_email_flow_responsible' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'flow_responsible'], $config), $member, $context),
446|
447| // ✅ RE-ENABLED: Needed for fixed stage automations (approved/rejected/classified)
448| 'send_email_responsible' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'responsible'], $config), $member, $context),
449| 'send_email_manager' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'manager'], $config), $member, $context),
450| 'send_email_company_member' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'company_member'], $config), $member, $context),
451| 'send_email_role' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'role'], $config), $member, $context),
452|
453| // PDI email types
454| 'send_email_member' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'member'], $config), $member, $context),
455| 'send_email_direct_manager' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'direct_manager'], $config), $member, $context),
456| 'send_email_goal_responsible' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'goal_responsible'], $config), $member, $context),
457| // PDI alert types (same as email but with alert tone)
458| 'send_alert' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['notification_type' => 'alert'], $config), $member, $context),
459| 'send_alert_member' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'member', 'notification_type' => 'alert'], $config), $member, $context),
460| 'send_alert_direct_manager' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'direct_manager', 'notification_type' => 'alert'], $config), $member, $context),
461| 'send_alert_goal_responsible' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'goal_responsible', 'notification_type' => 'alert'], $config), $member, $context),
462| 'notify_employee' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'employee'], $config), $member, $context),
463| 'notify_responsible' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'responsible'], $config), $member, $context),
464| 'notify_flow_responsible' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'flow_responsible'], $config), $member, $context),
465| 'notify_esocial_worker_data' => $this->executeNotifyEsocialWorkerData($config, $member, $context),
466| 'notify_manager' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'manager'], $config), $member, $context),
467| 'notify_administrators' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'administrators'], $config), $member, $context),
468| // Training-specific notify actions (YAML id used as type by the UI)
469| 'notify_training_responsible' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'training_group_responsible'], $config), $member, $context),
470| 'notify_participant' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'member'], $config), $member, $context),
471| // CRM notify actions (yaml types and legacy ids)
472| 'crm_action_notify_owner', 'crm_notify_record_owner' => $this->executeNotify($this->buildCrmNotifyConfig('record_owner', $config, $context), $member, $context),
473| 'crm_action_notify_board', 'crm_notify_board_owner' => $this->executeNotify($this->buildCrmNotifyConfig('board_owner', $config, $context), $member, $context),
474| 'notify', 'notification', 'send_notification' => $this->executeNotify($config, $member, $context),
475| 'bpm_notification', 'send_bpm_notification',
476| 'payroll_notify_flow_responsible', 'esocial_notify_flow_responsible' => $this->executeBpmNotification($config, $member, $context),
477| 'request_notification',
478| 'payroll_request_approval', 'esocial_request_approval' => $this->executeRequestNotification($config, $member, $context),
479| 'send_structural_research_invite' => $this->executeStructuralResearchInviteAction($config, $member, $context),
480| // NPS com IA: solicitação com aprovação/rejeição via executeRequestNotification (guia REQUEST_NOTIFICATION_IMPLEMENTATION_GUIDE.md)
481| 'nps_action_send_request_notification' => $this->executeRequestNotification(
482| $this->normalizeCrmStyledRequestNotificationForBpm($config, $member),
483| $member,
484| $context
485| ),
486| // CRM: na etapa NPS usa o mesmo pipeline; nas etapas CRM mantém envio legado via CrmAutomationService
487| 'crm_action_send_request_notification' => $this->executeCrmOrNpsRequestNotificationAction($config, $member, $context),
488|
489| // Outros tipos de ação
490| 'send_whatsapp' => $this->executeSendWhatsApp($config, $member, $context),
491| 'move_to_stage',
492| 'payroll_move_to_stage', 'esocial_move_to_stage' => $this->executeMoveToStage($config, $member, $context),
493| 'advance_to_next_stage', 'stage_change', 'move_to_next_stage',
494| 'payroll_move_to_next_stage', 'esocial_move_to_next_stage' => $this->shouldSkipAssessmentStageChange($context)
495| ? ['executed' => false, 'skipped' => true, 'reason' => 'assessment_already_responded_in_period']
496| : $this->executeAdvanceToNextStage($config, $member, $context),
497| 'update_status' => $this->executeUpdateStatus($config, $member, $context),
498| // ✅ Aliases for approve/reject - map to update_status with appropriate status
499| 'approve_candidate', 'approve' => $this->executeUpdateStatus(array_merge($config, ['status' => 'classified']), $member, $context),
500| 'classify_candidate', 'classify' => $this->executeUpdateStatus(array_merge($config, ['status' => 'classified']), $member, $context),
501| 'reject_candidate', 'reject' => $this->executeUpdateStatus(array_merge($config, ['status' => 'rejected']), $member, $context),
502| 'create_task' => $this->executeCreateTask($config, $member, $context),
503| 'schedule_interview' => $this->executeScheduleInterview($config, $member, $context),
504| 'assign_user' => $this->executeAssignUser($config, $member, $context),
505| 'add_tag' => $this->executeAddTag($config, $member, $context),
506| 'webhook' => $this->executeWebhook($config, $member, $context),
507| 'complete_flowable_task' => $this->executeCompleteFlowableTask($config, $member, $context),
508| // ✅ Advance rule action - treated as advance_to_next_stage
509| 'advance_rule' => $this->executeAdvanceToNextStage($config, $member, $context),
510| // ✅ Criar Processo Seletivo a partir de offboarding concluído
511| 'create_processo_seletivo' => $this->executeCreateProcessoSeletivo($config, $member, $context),
512| 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' => $this->executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft($config, $member, $context),
513|
514| // ✅ Visibilidade e Acesso - Offboarding
515| 'delay_offboarding_visibility' => $this->executeDelayOffboardingVisibility($config, $member, $context),
516| 'delay_platform_access_removal' => $this->executeDelayPlatformAccessRemoval($config, $member, $context),
517|
518| // ✅ PDI: Atribuir responsável à meta
519| 'assign_responsible', 'assign_goal_responsible' => $this->executeAssignGoalResponsible($config, $member, $context),
520|
521| // ✅ PDI: Movimentar sem solicitação (mesmo destino que Enviar solicitação, executa direto)
522| 'direct_movement',
523| 'assign_to_other_bpmn_flow_direct' => $this->executeDirectMovement($config, $member, $context),
524|
525| // ✅ Ciclos: iniciar todos os produtos associados à etapa do orquestrador
526| 'start_stage_products' => $this->executeStartStageProducts($config, $member, $context),
527| 'payroll_generate_monthly_sheet' => $this->executePayrollGenerateMonthlySheet($config, $member, $context, 'monthly'),
528| 'payroll_generate_weekly_sheet' => $this->executePayrollGenerateMonthlySheet($config, $member, $context, 'weekly'),
529| 'payroll_generate_biweekly_sheet' => $this->executePayrollGenerateMonthlySheet($config, $member, $context, 'biweekly'),
530| 'financial_flow_action' => $this->executeFinancialFlowAction($config, $member, $context),
531| 'esocial_validate_payroll_events' => $this->executeEsocialValidatePayrollEvents($config, $member, $context),
532| 'esocial_send_payroll_events' => $this->executeEsocialSendPayrollEvents($config, $member, $context),
533| 'esocial_check_payroll_response' => $this->executeEsocialCheckPayrollResponse($config, $member, $context),
534| // ✅ Jornada Metahuman: clona um novo ciclo ao entrar em Análise Jornada
535| 'jornada_clone_cycle' => $this->executeJornadaCloneCycle($config, $member, $context),
536|
537| // NPS Convite: notificações — default plain e-mail (evita slug auto inexistente no banco)
538| 'nps_action_notify_owner' => $this->executeNotify($this->mergeNpsNotifyRecipientConfig('record_owner', $config, $context), $member, $context),
539| 'nps_action_notify_admin' => $this->executeNotify($this->mergeNpsNotifyRecipientConfig('administrators', $config, $context), $member, $context),
540|
541| // NPS Convite: envia convite da pesquisa para o contato do registro CRM no fluxo
542| 'nps_action_send_invite' => $this->executeNpsSendInvite($config, $member, $context),
543| 'nps_action_move_to_evaluation' => $this->executeNpsKanbanMove(NpsBpmnService::STAGE_AVALIACAO, $config, $member, $context),
544| 'nps_action_move_to_not_authorized' => $this->executeNpsKanbanMove(NpsBpmnService::STAGE_NAO_AUTORIZADO, $config, $member, $context),
545| // NPS Avaliação: após X tempo, notificar follow-up de oportunidade (CRM) + opcional solicitação de novo registro
546| 'nps_action_evaluation_contact_followup' => $this->executeNpsEvaluationContactFollowup($config, $member, $context),
547|
548| default => ['executed' => false, 'message' => 'Tipo de ação desconhecido: ' . $type]
549| };
550| }
551|
552| /**
553| * @param array<string, mixed> $config
554| * @param array<string, mixed> $context
555| *
556| * @return array<string, mixed>
557| */
558| private function executeFinancialFlowAction(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member = null, array $context = []): array
559| {
560| if (!$this->financialFlowAutomationExecutor instanceof FinancialFlowAutomationExecutor) {
Request #38
deepseek-v4-flash
P:103.85K C:4.05K CR:100.35K CW:0
34322ms
Reasoning
Fine. Now I want to check the real code of executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft in full, to spot discrepancies with the diff; the diff is complete. But let me consider a functional issue: They call `$draftService->findEventLinkedToOffboarding($member, $offboardingMember, $company, $esocialTrabalhador, $remuneracao)` only if both exist. Inside, metadata eventId is loaded and eventMatchesContext; if matched and event status != 'pendente' → existing_not_editable (correct); if matched and 'pendente' → updated; but in this branch they then apply payload with onlyEmptyFields true (since eventStatus 'updated'), preserving fields. But careful: for a pending event linked by metadata, dataDesligamento is forced overwritten. Good.
But in the reuse-pending-draft branch (from findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal), they reuse a draft created manually; they set status 'updated'. But they also update event->dadosRemuneracao? They set `$event->setDadosRemuneracao($remuneracao)` outside the branch, good.
One more subtle: For existing event found by metadata that is 'pendente', the code inside elseif sets eventStatus 'updated', then later they skip applying payload? No: after the big if/elseif block, if eventStatus !== existing_not_editable, they set dadosRemuneracao, applyPayload($event,$payload, $eventStatus==='updated'). Good.
Potential bug: When eventStatus is 'existing_not_editable' but the event found by findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal (official), the code does NOT set event->dadosRemuneracao or apply payload; fine. But then metadata['eventId'] = event id set. Fine.
Let me now spot a specific issue: **`$eventStatus === 'existing_not_editable'` triggers when the found official event's `status != 'pendente'`. But the newly-created pending event path (create) is via createDraftEvent, and `$event->getId()` will be null before flush. After persist+flush in the first flush, metadata eventId updated. But here's the catch: In the "created" path, event is persisted and flushed within the same first flush? Let me verify: The code does `$this->entityManager->persist($event);` inside the big if (only if eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable'). Actually the persist($event) occurs before metadata update, then persist member, then flush. Wait reading the diff:
```
if ($eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable') {
$event->setDadosRemuneracao($remuneracao);
$draftService->applyPayload($event, $payload, $eventStatus === 'updated');
$this->entityManager->persist($event);
}
...
$metadata['esocialS2299Draft'] = [... 'eventId' => $event?->getId() ...]
$member->setSourceMetadata($metadata);
$this->entityManager->persist($member);
$this->entityManager->flush();
if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
$metadata = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? [];
$metadata['esocialS2299Draft']['eventId'] = $event->getId();
...
flush();
}
```
For a new event, after first flush, event->getId() is set. Then they update metadata eventId and flush again. So OK in real DB.
However: in the missing-data path (esocialTrabalhador or remuneração null), event null; no event persist. Fine.
Now bug candidate: `$event?->getId()` for an event found via repository is always non-null.
Now what about duplicate event prevention when worker data is missing: metadata stored but event null; when data later becomes complete and member re-enters stage? Actually the action re-runs only when the member enters the stage, but it already entered; no re-run unless stage changes. But there could be re-execution of automation on demand? Fine.
Let me now review the repository diff line 78 carefully regarding context: This line is within saveEventS2299 for a fresh event. It sets indPagtoApi to null when empty. Later XML creation of the S2299 event might require indPagtoApi mandatory? Not our concern.
OK.
Now examine the `decimalOrNull` normalizations: if value like '12,50' and also '%'?? percaliment stored as decimal of percent. e.g., '12,50' -> '12.50'. But eSocial schema percAliment: percent with 2 decimals (e.g., "12.50"). Fine.
Now let me consider whether OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService's `applyPayload` field mapping could break eSocial for pensAlim: pensAlim is code 1-4 for "pensão alimentícia" indicator; intOrNull('1') → 1. In the diff they also pass intOrNull for pensAlim; but repository passes raw data['pensAlim'] (e.g., '1') → int setter coercion? Actually there's no strict_types so ok.
Wait — repository change didn't touch pensAlim. Fine.
Now, think about cross-file contract: The automation's action type in the DB is 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' and YAML config/action title used by templates list. The migration seeds automation action_type 'create_esocial_s2299_draft'. Template list JS maps key. OK.
Now, another angle: The `OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService` docblock claims "Comportamento movido verbatim de AutomationExecutionService para não introduzir regressões." But is this actually verbatim from a previous version? Search for any earlier code implementing this logic to confirm the claim (e.g., removed code from another file). If the logic was moved from elsewhere, side-effect lost? Search for 'findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal' or 'buildDraftPayload' elsewhere in git? only in new file. The claim might just be false advertising; not a review blocker.
Now, since confirmed findings already mention the big issues in the migration and service, and the previous reviewers probably have commented on the god-object issue #2, event status #4 etc., maybe I should focus on finding smaller NEW issues such as:
1. In migration `up()`, after computing workflowProductExisted false, it calls ensureWorkflowProduct insert with orderIndex 0. But `ensureTemplate` is called with rollbackState `workflow_product_was_created => true`. Then ensureTemplateProduct and ensureOffboardingStages. However, in the down() SQL, the deletion of workflow_products removes the product link only when no OTHER ACTIVE template uses that product for the workflow. But the newly seeded template itself is set is_active=0 in the SAME down() after deletion (deletion condition excludes templateId via `active_ft.id <> :templateId`). Good.
2. In down(), there's also flow_template_products cleanup missing (deleting links). The seeded template gets is_active=0 so the flow_template_products link remains but harmless. But flow_stages etc remain. That's confirmed finding #1's scope (stages/automations/template products).
3. Maybe an additional NEW migration issue: **`ensureOffboardingStages` inserts stages/automations keyed only by stage name + product, NOT scoped to the template seed marker.** If two different seed migrations created same stage names in the same template for the same product (e.g., if this up() is applied, rolled back partially, or if there was a manual pre-existing flow where the 'fluxo-de-saida' workflow already had a template with stage 'Etapa 1 - Preparação'), the seeded template is new so no issue. However ensureStage checks only within templateId. Since each run seeds a fresh template, idempotence by template id is fine for its own rows.
But there's a subtle NEW issue: **In up(), when the template already existed from a previous run (partial state), ensureOffboardingStages is called again, and because ensureStage queries with `product_slot_index IS NULL` and by name, but if a previous run had inserted automations for a stage but crashed before inserting all stages, the partial remains. Since it queries by name, adding remaining automations works. Fine.
4. Another NEW migration issue: **The up() seeds the automation 'Criar Processo Seletivo ao concluir offboarding' action create_processo_seletivo. Is create_processo_seletivo among allowed actions for offboarding yaml? Let's check yaml for that action's entry - it likely existed before. Actually the migration seeds 'create_processo_seletivo' with trigger on_offboarding_complete. If the yaml file doesn't declare create_processo_seletivo action under offboarding, the front-end might not render it? Let's check the yaml for create_processo_seletivo.** Not necessary for review.
5. Let me reconsider something that may be a genuine NEW bug: **In executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft, when no EsocialDadosTrabalhador is found, the automation returns success true with eventStatus 'draft_only' and missing worker data. BUT it doesn't notify about creating the event with a payload — fine.
Actually, more interesting: **The automation runs when the member ENTERS the stage. But if eSocial data is incomplete at that moment, they record metadata 'draft_only' and send notification about missing data. If the responsible later fills the data, nothing re-triggers the creation of the S-2299 draft automatically unless the member re-enters the stage or an on_enter action re-runs. That means the S-2299 draft might never be created after data completion. Is there an additional trigger like esocial data updated? The action only supports employee_enters_stage. So a missing-data situation leaves a dead-end unless someone manually moves the member out & back into the final stage. That's a product/functional gap. However maybe the system re-executes automations upon data updates? Let's check if there is an on data completion? Not sure. Might be a valid finding, but a bit speculative regarding intended UX; given docs say "Complete os dados e abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar", the Adriana might guide manual creation. So perhaps not a bug.
Let me instead look for specific issues with the EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento type change concerning `getIndPagtoApi` etc., then move on to search for SQL-injection or security risk in the migration's use of json param etc.
Migration down uses parameters; fine.
OK, potential NEW finding: In the entity file, the `setPercAliment(?string ...)` typed but the property has no declared type; and `EsocialDataService` (S2299 entity EsocialS2299EvtDeslig used elsewhere) remains int. In scope, changed code only S2299EsocialEvtDesligamento methods. Since property mapping decimal → string. Changing getters to string is correct. But the **migration to change column type is not needed** because column is decimal already. Not a DB change.
Now maybe there's a real regression: **CompanyMemberController or other code that previously passed ints into setPercAliment/setVrAlim now could silently store strings with trailing comma or invalid decimals; but since the entity changed in this PR, code that previously relied on the value being integer (percent 12 vs decimal 12.50) — e.g., when DB decimal returns "12.50", prior getter ?int would crash only if not null; if null, no crash. So there might have been production code passing integer percent values (e.g., 12 meaning 12%) stored as decimal 12.00, and reading getPercAliment would TypeError when hydrating existing events that have percaliment set. That must already have been broken before; so likely all existing percAliment values were null, OR the getter wasn't invoked... but FlowableVariablesService invokes it when rendering an event. If events existed with percAliment not null and template rendered, error. So maybe there are no such events in production, and this change enables the new offboarding feature. OK.
Let me now confirm whether twig template fix (other file, not in review list) is fine; not in review.
Now, examine test file for issues per rules:
- test setUp uses reflection to set ids, not DB.
- No ALTER.
- Fine.
But test file builds `AutomationExecutionService` with `new MockHttpClient()` and passes null for optional deps; some optional services needed for executeNotify's chat may be null (e.g., notificationsCenterService null). Fine.
Consider test helper `entityManagerForEsocialDraft`: They mock $em->method('flush') no side effect. The real AutomationExecutionService uses notificationsCenterService only if instance set; null then skip.
Now the specific test `testCreateEsocialDraftStoresAuditMetadataWhenWorkerDataIsMissing` asserts that a NotificationSpecialist was persisted once even though no user? Wait — mailerEnabled false. In executeNotify: for each recipient company_member; resolveRecipients returns user via companyMembers find with user? In the mock, companyMembersRepo->method('find') returns responsibleMember for id 20; companyMembersRepo->findOneBy returns null. But resolveRecipients 'company_member' uses $context['company_member_id'] (20) and repo find(20) → responsibleMember with user responsibleUser. So users = [responsibleUser]. Then NotificationSpecialist persisted. That's 1. No email because user repo findOneBy returns null for email? Wait in executeNotify, email sending requires templateSlug or body. Since messageHtml provided, emailConfig body = emailTemplateBody non-empty → executeSendEmail called with to = user->getEmail() (null). executeSendEmail may skip if no email? Yet the first test didn't assert emailsSent. Since NotificationSpecialist=1 OK.
Chat? executeSendEmail triggers chat only when it sends email? For mailer disabled scenario user email null → probably no email, and no chat. So nothing else. OK.
Now, there is a notable mismatch: The first test (`testCreateEsocialDraftStoresAuditMetadataWhenWorkerDataIsMissing`) asserts `assertCount(1, ... NotificationSpecialist)`. That happens through executeNotify. But wait in executeNotify, the notification in-app is created only when there's a `user`. But earlier: **resolveRecipients** for 'company_member' with `$context['company_member_id']` (string '20'). They find member 20 -> responsibleMember. OK.
Now what about the chat? email sending includes chat message? executeSendEmail probably also sends chat when there is a body (even if email fails? Actually mailer mock send expects once in the second test). In second test mailerEnabled true, user email found via email repo 'responsavel@example.com'; chat sent as Adriana; mailer sends email. Test expectations match.
OK, so tests seem fine.
Given confirmed findings, do I have new distinct issues to report? Let's think about anything in the code not covered:
1. **OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService::buildReviewUrl path appends '?esocialTab=desligamento' even when router->generate returns a URL that already contains a query string** — unlikely here.
2. **`OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService::cpfOrNull` does not validate length but stores digits only; not a big issue.**
3. **`OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService::dateOrNull` catches Throwable returning null but formats with `new \DateTime($value)`, using server TZ; fine.**
4. **Potential issue: `findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal` includes events with status 'enviado' but doesn't account for S-2299 sent but later "retificado" with same dismissal date and same worker/remuneração; there can be multiple official events for same dismissal (original + retification). The method picks the most recent event id (orderBy DESC) and treats it as not editable; but a pending corrective event (indRetif=2) might exist that SHOULD be updated. Covered conceptually by #4? partially. Not needed.
5. Let's look for a NEW finding regarding **duplicate flush and persisting member without checking for a change** — not a bug.
6. Let's search whether `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` has `setUpdatedAt` method (inherited from EsocialEvents). Yes presumably.
7. Check that `OffboardingMember::getDismissalDate()` may return null causing `dataDesligamento => ''`; and event created with dtDeslig null. Later, when the dismissal date is set and member is moved to final stage again, the reuse logic finds pending draft with dtDeslig null, updates. Good.
Now, one more angle to explore: The new automation action gets executed inside the transaction/execution of automations triggered by `FlowStageEventListener`. But there might be an **existing member on the final stage at the time the template is applied** (existing flows): when a company starts using this template with members already in the final stage, the on_enter event won't fire retroactively. So no draft created for existing members. Might be acceptable.
Now let me look for potential data privacy/info leak: executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft returns array including reviewUrl and payload? Actually returns detailed array, not logged? The catch logs error message and memberId only; no sensitive data. The dispatch may log result via error_log? executeAction logs config at debug. Config may include no secrets.
Let me consider whether the automation's return array (with reviewUrl, event ids) may be persisted in audit or logged with sensitive payload including `responsibleName`? return doesn't include payload. Metadata does include payload with _offboarding reason/responsible. Fine.
Now, given time constraints, let me search for actual recent references: maybe there's a conflict between the new service's autowiring and config/services.yaml for `OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService` being under a directory not autoloaded or excluded from autowire (e.g., services.yaml only autowires `App\Service\`?). Let's check config/services.yaml defaults around App\Service.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 1508, "file_path": "config/services.yaml", "start_line": 1}
Result
File: config/services.yaml (Total lines: 1698)
IS_TRUNCATED: true
LINE_RANGE: 1-500
1|# config/services.yaml
2|
3|parameters:
4| env(LOCK_DSN): 'flock'
5| env(INTEGRATION_FOLHA_WORKLOAD): 'mock'
6| env(INTEGRATION_FOLHA_SALARY): 'mock'
7| env(INTEGRATION_ESOCIAL): 'mock'
8| # Folha Totvs / GovBr eSocial: preencher em `.env.local` quando usar adapters reais (INTEGRATION_* ≠ mock).
9| env(TOTVS_API_URL): ''
10| env(TOTVS_API_TOKEN): ''
11| env(ESOCIAL_API_URL): ''
12| env(ESOCIAL_CERT_PATH): ''
13| env(ESOCIAL_CERT_PASSWORD): ''
14| env(GEMINI_API_KEY): ''
15| env(CAPTCHA_ENABLED): 'true'
16| env(TURNSTILE_SITE_KEY): ''
17| env(TURNSTILE_SECRET_KEY): ''
18| env(APP_WEBSOCKET_URL): ''
19| env(FLOWABLE_URL): ''
20| env(FLOWABLE_USERNAME): ''
21| env(FLOWABLE_PASSWORD): ''
22| env(FLOWABLE_BPMN_WEBHOOK_BASE_URL): ''
23| env(FLOWABLE_INTEGRATION_DEK): ''
24| env(FLOWABLE_BPMN_USE_SPRING_DELEGATES): 'false'
25| env(FLOWABLE_CALLBACK_HOST): 'host.docker.internal'
26| env(FLOWABLE_CALLBACK_PORT): '8000'
27| app.flowable.bpmn.webhook_base_url: '%env(default::FLOWABLE_BPMN_WEBHOOK_BASE_URL)%'
28| app.flowable.integration.dek: '%env(default::FLOWABLE_INTEGRATION_DEK)%'
29| env(JAVA_API_URL): ''
30| env(APP_AMBIENTE): 'dev'
31| app.env: "%env(APP_ENV)%"
32| app.ambiente: "%env(APP_AMBIENTE)%"
33| app.websocket_url: "%env(APP_WEBSOCKET_URL)%"
34| app.layout_admin_assets_version: "20260510-1"
35| app.mailtrap.smtp: "%env(APP_MAILTRAP_SMTP)%"
36| app.mailtrap.user: "%env(APP_MAILTRAP_USER)%"
37| app.mailtrap.password: "%env(APP_MAILTRAP_PASSWORD)%"
38| app.mailtrap.port: "%env(APP_MAILTRAP_PORT)%"
39| app.mailtrap.encryption: "%env(APP_MAILTRAP_ENCRYPTION)%"
40| env(MAILER_URL): 'null://localhost'
41| app.zapsignapitoken: "%env(APP_ZAPSIGNAPITOKEN)%"
42| app.zapsignapisandbox: "%env(APP_ZAPSIGNAPISANDBOX)%"
43| app.zapsignapitemplate: "%env(APP_ZAPSIGNTEMPLATE)%"
44| env(ASAAS_API_BASE_URL): "https://api-sandbox.asaas.com/v3"
45| env(ASAAS_PUBLIC_BASE_URL): ""
46| env(ASAAS_KEY): ""
47| env(ASAAS_TOKEN_WEBHOOK): ""
48| env(ASAAS_WALLET_ID): ""
49| env(FOCUS_NFE_ENV): "homologacao"
50| env(FOCUS_NFE_BASE_URL): "https://homologacao.focusnfe.com.br"
51| env(FOCUS_NFE_TOKEN): ""
52| env(FOCUS_NFE_WEBHOOK_TOKEN): ""
53| env(DISCORD_LOG_ENABLED): "true"
54| env(DISCORD_LOG_WEBHOOK_URL): ""
55| gemini_api_key_default: ""
56| app.captcha.enabled: "%env(bool:CAPTCHA_ENABLED)%"
57| app.turnstile.site_key: "%env(TURNSTILE_SITE_KEY)%"
58| app.turnstile.secret_key: "%env(TURNSTILE_SECRET_KEY)%"
59| env(DOCUSEAL_BASE_URL): "http://localhost:3000"
60| env(DOCUSEAL_BASE_URL_PROD): ""
61| env(HETRIX_HEARTBEAT_DAILY_PLAN_CHARGES_URL): "https://sm.hetrixtools.net/hb/?s=23c3297509cb48e8055d0700dbbf6f0c"
62| env(HETRIX_HEARTBEAT_SYNC_MODEL_PRICES_URL): "https://sm.hetrixtools.net/hb/?s=8fd7fe381679edb9fcc0843a13dbc1b7"
63| env(APP_FAKE_TODAY): ""
64| env(APP_FAKE_CREDITS_AUTO): ""
65| env(APP_FAKE_CREDITS_GEMINI): ""
66| env(APP_FAKE_CREDITS_OPENAI): ""
67| env(APP_FAKE_CREDITS_OPUS): ""
68| env(APP_FAKE_EXTRA_CREDITS): ""
69| app.asaas.api_base_url: "%env(ASAAS_API_BASE_URL)%"
70| app.asaas.public_base_url: "%env(default::ASAAS_PUBLIC_BASE_URL)%"
71| app.asaas.api_key: "%env(default::ASAAS_KEY)%"
72| app.asaas.webhook_token: "%env(default::ASAAS_TOKEN_WEBHOOK)%"
73| app.asaas.wallet_id: "%env(default::ASAAS_WALLET_ID)%"
74| app.focus_nfe.env: "%env(default::FOCUS_NFE_ENV)%"
75| app.focus_nfe.base_url: "%env(default::FOCUS_NFE_BASE_URL)%"
76| app.focus_nfe.token: "%env(default::FOCUS_NFE_TOKEN)%"
77| app.focus_nfe.webhook_token: "%env(default::FOCUS_NFE_WEBHOOK_TOKEN)%"
78| app.discord.log_enabled: "%env(bool:DISCORD_LOG_ENABLED)%"
79| app.discord.log_webhook_url: "%env(default::DISCORD_LOG_WEBHOOK_URL)%"
80| app.hetrix.heartbeat.daily_plan_charges_url: "%env(HETRIX_HEARTBEAT_DAILY_PLAN_CHARGES_URL)%"
81| app.hetrix.heartbeat.sync_model_prices_url: "%env(HETRIX_HEARTBEAT_SYNC_MODEL_PRICES_URL)%"
82| app.billing.fake_today: "%env(default::APP_FAKE_TODAY)%"
83| app.billing.fake_credits.auto: "%env(default::APP_FAKE_CREDITS_AUTO)%"
84| app.billing.fake_credits.gemini: "%env(default::APP_FAKE_CREDITS_GEMINI)%"
85| app.billing.fake_credits.openai: "%env(default::APP_FAKE_CREDITS_OPENAI)%"
86| app.billing.fake_credits.opus: "%env(default::APP_FAKE_CREDITS_OPUS)%"
87| app.billing.fake_extra_credits: "%env(default::APP_FAKE_EXTRA_CREDITS)%"
88| env(DEEPSEEK_API_KEY): ''
89| app.deepseek.api_key: "%env(DEEPSEEK_API_KEY)%"
90| env(DEEPSEEK_MODEL): "deepseek-chat"
91| env(LIVE_SURVEY_BASE_URL): ''
92| env(LIVE_SURVEY_INTEGRATION_SECRET): ''
93| env(INTERVIEW_ALLOW_REPEAT_RESPONSES): 'false'
94| uploads_directory : "%kernel.project_dir%/public/uploads"
95| env(GPT_API_KEY): ''
96| app.gpt.api_key: "%env(GPT_API_KEY)%"
97|
98| # LLM Provider Configuration (DeepSeek only)
99| llm.provider: "%env(LLM_PROVIDER)%"
100| llm.temperature: "%env(float:LLM_TEMPERATURE)%"
101| llm.top_p: "%env(float:LLM_TOP_P)%"
102| llm.presence_penalty: "%env(float:LLM_PRESENCE_PENALTY)%"
103| llm.frequency_penalty: "%env(float:LLM_FREQUENCY_PENALTY)%"
104| deepseek.model: "%env(DEEPSEEK_MODEL)%"
105| google.api_key: "%env(GOOGLE_API_KEY)%"
106| google.client_id: "%env(GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID)%"
107| google.client_secret: "%env(GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET)%"
108| google.redirect_uri: "%env(GOOGLE_REDIRECT_URI)%"
109| microsoft.client_id: "%env(MICROSOFT_CLIENT_ID)%"
110| microsoft.client_secret: "%env(MICROSOFT_CLIENT_SECRET)%"
111| microsoft.redirect_uri: "%env(MICROSOFT_REDIRECT_URI)%"
112| microsoft.tenant_id: "%env(MICROSOFT_TENANT_ID)%"
113| linkedin.client_id: "%env(LINKEDIN_CLIENT_ID)%"
114| linkedin.client_secret: "%env(LINKEDIN_CLIENT_SECRET)%"
115| linkedin.redirect_uri_dev: "%env(LINKEDIN_REDIRECT_URI_DEV)%"
116| linkedin.redirect_uri_prod: "%env(LINKEDIN_REDIRECT_URI_PROD)%"
117| google.redirect_uri_dev: "%env(GOOGLE_REDIRECT_URI_DEV)%"
118| google.redirect_uri_prod: "%env(GOOGLE_REDIRECT_URI_PROD)%"
119| certificates_ca_path: '%kernel.project_dir%/config/esocial/certificates_ca'
120| company_certificates_path: '%kernel.project_dir%/config/esocial/company_certificates'
121| google_maps_api_key: '%env(GOOGLE_API_KEY)%'
122| bbb.base_url: '%env(BBB_BASE_URL)%'
123| bbb.secret: '%env(BBB_SECRET)%'
124| # Fallbacks locais para evitar falha de boot quando variáveis não existirem
125| env(OPENMEETINGS_BASE_URL): ''
126| env(OPENMEETINGS_USERNAME): ''
127| env(OPENMEETINGS_PASSWORD): ''
128| # Coach RAG / AI Committee — quando ausentes no .env o container falha ao resolver AiCommitteeController
129| env(COACH_RAG_VECTOR_ENABLED): '0'
130| env(COACH_DEBUG_PROMPT): '0'
131| env(QDRANT_URL): 'http://127.0.0.1:6333'
132| env(COACH_RAG_LOCAL_EMBED_URL): 'http://127.0.0.1:8080'
133| env(ADRIANA_WORKFLOW_VECTOR_RETRIEVAL_ENABLED): '1'
134| env(ADRIANA_WORKFLOW_RETRIEVAL_ENABLED): '1'
135| # Pausa mínima entre chamadas LLM (ms); alinhado ao default do construtor (1200).
136| env(AI_COMMITTEE_LLM_MIN_INTERVAL_MS): '1200'
137| env(ANTHROPIC_API_KEY): ''
138| env(GOOGLE_API_KEY): ''
139| env(OPENAI_COMMITTEE_API_KEY): ''
140| openmeetings.base_url: '%env(OPENMEETINGS_BASE_URL)%'
141| openmeetings.username: '%env(OPENMEETINGS_USERNAME)%'
142| openmeetings.password: '%env(OPENMEETINGS_PASSWORD)%'
143| files.storage_dir: "%kernel.project_dir%/var/storage"
144| files.driver: 'local'
145| # Slug do produto "Saúde e Segurança" (pai dos ssma-*). Override no .env: SSMA_PARENT_PRODUCT_SLUG=outro-slug
146| env(SSMA_PARENT_PRODUCT_SLUG): 'saude-e-seguranca'
147| ssma.parent_product_slug: '%env(SSMA_PARENT_PRODUCT_SLUG)%'
148| # Pusher (comitê IA): vazio = monitor desligado; preencha em .env.local
149| pusher_env_default: ''
150| pusher_cluster_default: 'mt1'
151| # Model v3 — defaults merged into runFromBundle tenant policy ({@see CommitteeV3TenantPolicyAssembler})
152| committee_v3_tenant_policy_defaults: []
153|
154|imports:
155| - { resource: services/ai_committee_messenger_handler.yaml }
156|
157|services:
158| # Default configuration for services in *this* file
159| _defaults:
160| autowire: true # Automatically injects dependencies in your services.
161| autoconfigure: true # Automatically registers your services as commands, event subscribers, etc.
162| public: false
163| bind:
164| string $gptApiKey: "%env(GPT_API_KEY)%"
165| string $deepseekApiKey: "%env(DEEPSEEK_API_KEY)%"
166| string $deepseekModel: "%env(default:app.deepseek.model_default:DEEPSEEK_MODEL)%"
167| string $appEnv: "%env(APP_ENV)%"
168| string $appAmbiente: "%app.ambiente%"
169| string $docusealBase: "%env(DOCUSEAL_BASE_URL)%"
170| string $docusealBaseProd: "%env(default::DOCUSEAL_BASE_URL_PROD)%"
171| string $ssmaParentProductSlug: "%ssma.parent_product_slug%"
172| bool $allowRepeatInterviewResponses: "%env(bool:INTERVIEW_ALLOW_REPEAT_RESPONSES)%"
173|
174| _instanceof:
175| App\Service\Governance\Grc\Detector\GovernanceDetectorInterface:
176| tags: ["app.governance_detector"]
177|
178| App\Service\Cnab\CnabWriterInterface:
179| tags: ["app.cnab.writer"]
180|
181| App\Service\Cnab\CnabParserInterface:
182| tags: ["app.cnab.parser"]
183|
184| App\Service\Products\AbstractGroupCycleStageBpmnService:
185| tags: ["app.group_cycle_stage_bpmn_handler"]
186|
187| App\Service\Adriana\Questionnaire\Register\QuestionnaireRegisterHandlerInterface:
188| tags: ['adriana.questionnaire_register_handler']
189|
190| App\Service\Adriana\Suggestion\SuggestionResolverInterface:
191| tags: ['adriana.suggestion_resolver']
192|
193| App\Service\Adriana\Instance\Product\AdrianaInstanceProductHandlerInterface:
194| tags: ["app.adriana_instance_product_handler"]
195|
196| App\Service\Effectiveness\EffectivenessDimensionProviderInterface:
197| tags: ["app.effectiveness.dimension_provider"]
198|
199| # Makes classes in src/ available to be used as services
200| # This creates a service per class whose id is the fully-qualified class name
201| App\:
202| resource: "../src/"
203| exclude:
204| - "../src/DependencyInjection/"
205| - "../src/Entity/"
206| - "../src/Kernel.php"
207| - "../src/Tests/"
208| - "../src/Ontology/"
209| - "../src/Service/Ontology/"
210| - "../src/Service/LLM/OllamaProvider.php"
211| - "../src/Command/OntologyInspectCommand.php"
212| - "../src/MessageHandler/RunAiCommitteeSessionMessageHandler.php"
213|
214| App\Service\Governance\Grc\DetectionCollector:
215| arguments:
216| $detectors: !tagged_iterator app.governance_detector
217|
218| App\Service\Ontology\:
219| resource: "../src/Service/Ontology/"
220|
221| # 1) Registrar o parser do PDF como service
222| Smalot\PdfParser\Parser: ~
223|
224| # 2) (Opcional) Deixar explícito que o PdfTextExtractor usa o Parser registrado
225| App\Service\PdfTextExtractor:
226| arguments:
227| $pdfParser: '@Smalot\PdfParser\Parser'
228|
229| App\Service\BillingClockService:
230| arguments:
231| $fakeToday: '%app.billing.fake_today%'
232|
233| App\Service\BillingCreditLimitOverrideService:
234| arguments:
235| $autoCredits: '%app.billing.fake_credits.auto%'
236| $geminiCredits: '%app.billing.fake_credits.gemini%'
237| $openaiCredits: '%app.billing.fake_credits.openai%'
238| $opusCredits: '%app.billing.fake_credits.opus%'
239| App\Service\Adriana\Instance\Product\AdrianaInstanceProductHandlerRegistry:
240| arguments:
241| $handlers: !tagged_iterator app.adriana_instance_product_handler
242|
243|
244| App\Service\ExtraCreditWalletService:
245| arguments:
246| $fakeExtraCredits: '%app.billing.fake_extra_credits%'
247|
248| App\Service\DiscordLogNotifier:
249| arguments:
250| $webhookUrl: '%app.discord.log_webhook_url%'
251|
252| App\Security\Captcha\CaptchaVerifierInterface:
253| alias: App\Security\Captcha\CloudflareTurnstileVerifier
254|
255| App\Security\Captcha\CloudflareTurnstileVerifier:
256| arguments:
257| $captchaEnabled: '%app.captcha.enabled%'
258| $appEnv: '%app.env%'
259| $secretKey: '%app.turnstile.secret_key%'
260|
261| App\Service\DiscordLogMirrorService:
262| arguments:
263| $appAmbiente: '%app.ambiente%'
264| $discordLogEnabled: '%app.discord.log_enabled%'
265|
266| App\Service\HetrixHeartbeatService:
267| arguments:
268| $dailyPlanChargesUrl: '%app.hetrix.heartbeat.daily_plan_charges_url%'
269| $syncModelPricesUrl: '%app.hetrix.heartbeat.sync_model_prices_url%'
270|
271| App\Service\MetaHuman\MetaHumanDoc73ActorBucketResolverInterface:
272| alias: App\Service\MetaHuman\MetaHumanProfessionalDossierAccessService
273|
274| App\Service\MetaHuman\LitigationCasePackLiveIntegrationPortInterface:
275| alias: App\Service\MetaHuman\DefaultLitigationCasePackLiveIntegrationPort
276|
277| App\Service\MetaHuman\Litigation\Port\LitigationSeveranceExposurePortInterface:
278| alias: App\Service\MetaHuman\Litigation\Port\LitigationSeveranceExposurePort
279|
280| App\Service\MetaHuman\ClientStrategic\Alert\ChampionWeakenedSignalsPortInterface:
281| alias: App\Service\MetaHuman\ClientStrategic\Alert\AggregatorChampionWeakenedSignalsPort
282|
283| App\Service\MetaHuman\ClientStrategic\Alert\StakeholderNaoMapeadoSignalsPortInterface:
284| alias: App\Service\MetaHuman\ClientStrategic\Alert\AggregatorStakeholderNaoMapeadoSignalsPort
285|
286| App\Service\MetaHuman\ClientStrategic\Alert\TimeNossoFragilizadoSignalsPortInterface:
287| alias: App\Service\MetaHuman\ClientStrategic\Alert\AggregatorTimeNossoFragilizadoSignalsPort
288|
289| App\Service\MetaHuman\ClientStrategic\Alert\ConcentracaoCriticaSignalsPortInterface:
290| alias: App\Service\MetaHuman\ClientStrategic\Alert\AggregatorConcentracaoCriticaSignalsPort
291|
292| App\Service\MetaHuman\ClientStrategic\Alert\PadraoPreRenovacaoSignalsPortInterface:
293| alias: App\Service\MetaHuman\ClientStrategic\Alert\AggregatorPadraoPreRenovacaoSignalsPort
294|
295| App\Service\MetaHuman\ClientStrategic\ClientStrategicBpmSignalsPortInterface:
296| alias: App\Service\MetaHuman\ClientStrategic\StubClientStrategicBpmSignalsPort
297|
298| App\Service\MetaHuman\ClientStrategic\Alert\ConcentracaoCriticaEphemeralPayloadHolder: ~
299|
300| App\Service\MetaHuman\ClientStrategic\Alert\ClientStrategicAlertDispatcher:
301| arguments:
302| $signalEvaluators:
303| - '@App\Service\MetaHuman\ClientStrategic\Alert\ChampionEnfraquecidoAlertSignalEvaluator'
304| - '@App\Service\MetaHuman\ClientStrategic\Alert\StakeholderNovoNaoMapeadoAlertSignalEvaluator'
305| - '@App\Service\MetaHuman\ClientStrategic\Alert\TimeNossoFragilizadoAlertSignalEvaluator'
306| - '@App\Service\MetaHuman\ClientStrategic\Alert\ConcentracaoCriticaAlertSignalEvaluator'
307| - '@App\Service\MetaHuman\ClientStrategic\Alert\PadraoPreRenovacaoAlertSignalEvaluator'
308|
309| App\Scheduler\ClientStrategicAlertSchedulerEngineInterface:
310| alias: App\Service\MetaHuman\ClientStrategic\ClientStrategicAlertDeterministicEngine
311|
312| App\Scheduler\AlertSchedulerService:
313| arguments:
314| $logger: '@monolog.logger.alertas_scheduler'
315|
316| App\MessageHandler\RunClientStrategicAlertSchedulerHandler:
317| arguments:
318| $logger: '@monolog.logger.alertas_scheduler'
319|
320| App\Repository\AlertCatalogRepository: ~
321|
322|
323|
324| App\Service\AdrianaCognitiveLayer\AdrianaCognitiveLayerGate:
325| arguments:
326| $enabled: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.enabled%'
327| $baseUrl: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.url%'
328| $companyIdsCsv: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.company_ids%'
329|
330| App\Service\AdrianaCognitiveLayer\AdrianaCognitiveLayerClient:
331| arguments:
332| $baseUrl: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.url%'
333| $timeoutSeconds: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.timeout_seconds%'
334|
335| App\Service\DeepResearch\DeepResearchGate:
336| arguments:
337| $enabled: '%deep_research.enabled%'
338|
339| App\Service\Dissonance\DissonanceGate:
340| arguments:
341| $enabled: '%dissonance.enabled%'
342|
343| App\Service\DeepResearch\DeepResearchProxyService:
344| arguments:
345| $baseUrl: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.url%'
346| $timeoutSeconds: '%deep_research.timeout_seconds%'
347|
348| App\Service\KnowledgeVault\KnowledgeVaultProxyService:
349| arguments:
350| $baseUrl: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.url%'
351| $timeoutSeconds: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.timeout_seconds%'
352|
353| App\Service\AdrianaCognitiveLayer\Tools\AdrianaDeepResearchToolsService:
354| arguments:
355| $chunkSize: '%deep_research.chunk_size%'
356| $chunkOverlap: '%deep_research.chunk_overlap%'
357|
358| App\Service\AdrianaCognitiveLayer\AdrianaContextTokenService:
359| arguments:
360| $jwtSecret: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.jwt_secret%'
361| $ttlSeconds: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.jwt_ttl_seconds%'
362| $issuer: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.jwt_issuer%'
363| $audience: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.jwt_audience%'
364|
365| App\Service\AdrianaCognitiveLayer\AdrianaConversationHistoryService:
366| arguments:
367| $historyLimit: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.history_limit%'
368| $aiUserId: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.ai_user_id%'
369|
370| App\Service\AdrianaCognitiveLayer\Tools\AdrianaContextJwtValidator:
371| arguments:
372| $jwtSecret: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.jwt_secret%'
373|
374| App\Service\Adriana\Gate\AdrianaFlowGate:
375| arguments:
376| $enabledFlowsCsv: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.flows%'
377|
378| App\Service\Interview\InterviewLayerBridgeService:
379| arguments:
380| $voiceEnabled: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.voice_enabled%'
381|
382| App\Service\Interview\InterviewVoiceSessionService:
383| arguments:
384| $publicLayerUrl: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.public_url%'
385|
386| App\Service\AdrianaCognitiveLayer\AdrianaVoiceSessionService:
387| arguments:
388| $voiceEnabled: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.voice_enabled%'
389| $publicLayerUrl: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.public_url%'
390|
391| App\Service\Ssma\SsmaLayerBridgeService:
392| arguments:
393| $ssmaLayerExtractionEnabled: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.ssma_layer_extraction%'
394| $ssmaLayerAutoWhenActive: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.ssma_layer_auto%'
395|
396| App\Service\Adriana\Gate\WorkflowLayerRolloutGate:
397| arguments:
398| $workflowLayerInterpretationEnabled: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.workflow_layer_interpretation%'
399|
400| App\Service\Adriana\WorkflowLayerBridgeService:
401| arguments:
402| $workflowLayerInterpretationEnabled: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.workflow_layer_interpretation%'
403|
404| App\Service\Adriana\Retrieval\WorkflowRetrievalEmbeddingService:
405| arguments:
406| $vectorEnabled: '%env(bool:ADRIANA_WORKFLOW_VECTOR_RETRIEVAL_ENABLED)%'
407|
408| App\Service\Adriana\Retrieval\WorkflowRetrievalContextEnricher:
409| arguments:
410| $enabled: '%env(bool:ADRIANA_WORKFLOW_RETRIEVAL_ENABLED)%'
411|
412| App\Service\Adriana\Retrieval\WorkflowRetrievalTemplateIndexerInterface: '@App\Service\Adriana\Retrieval\WorkflowRetrievalIndexService'
413| App\Service\Adriana\Retrieval\WorkflowRetrievalDraftIndexerInterface: '@App\Service\Adriana\Retrieval\WorkflowRetrievalIndexService'
414|
415| App\Service\Adriana\Retrieval\WorkflowRetrievalMarkdownIndexer:
416| arguments:
417| $projectDir: '%kernel.project_dir%'
418|
419| App\Service\Adriana\WorkflowLayerDomainIntentProbeInterface: '@App\Service\Adriana\WorkflowLayerBridgeService'
420|
421| App\Service\Adriana\WorkflowResolvedProductResolver:
422| arguments:
423| $workflowLayerInterpretationEnabled: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.workflow_layer_interpretation%'
424|
425| App\Service\Adriana\WorkflowProductResolutionEvaluator: ~
426|
427| App\Service\Adriana\WorkflowLayerBlockProductResolutionEnforcer: ~
428|
429| App\Service\Adriana\WorkflowLayerBlockNormalizerBootstrap: ~
430|
431| App\Service\Adriana\WorkflowApprovedFlowTemplateMaterializerInterface: '@App\Service\Adriana\WorkflowApprovedFlowTemplateMaterializer'
432|
433| App\Service\Adriana\WorkflowApprovedFlowTemplateMaterializer: ~
434|
435| App\Service\Adriana\WorkflowBpmnExportClientInterface: '@App\Service\Adriana\WorkflowBpmnExportClient'
436|
437| App\Service\Adriana\WorkflowBpmnExportClient:
438| arguments:
439| $exportBaseUrl: '%adriana_workflow_bpmn_export.url%'
440| $javaApiUrlFallback: '%adriana_workflow_bpmn_export.java_api_url%'
441| $exportEnabled: '%adriana_workflow_bpmn_export.enabled%'
442| $timeoutSeconds: '%adriana_workflow_bpmn_export.timeout_seconds%'
443| $maxAttempts: '%adriana_workflow_bpmn_export.max_attempts%'
444|
445| App\Service\Adriana\Gate\AdrianaTopicGate:
446| arguments:
447| $memberResearchMode: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.topic_member_research%'
448| $buscarMode: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.topic_buscar%'
449| $resumeMode: '%adriana_cognitive_layer.topic_resume%'
450|
451| App\Service\Adriana\Command\PrincipalTopicLayerReplyPort:
452| alias: App\Service\Adriana\Command\PrincipalTopicLayerReplyService
453|
454| App\Service\Adriana\Command\BuscarCommandPort:
455| alias: App\Service\Adriana\Command\BuscarCommandService
456|
457| App\Service\Adriana\Command\ResumeCommandPort:
458| alias: App\Service\Adriana\Command\ResumeCommandService
459|
460| App\Service\Adriana\Handler\AdrianaSendPipeline:
461| arguments:
462| $handlers: !tagged_iterator adriana.turn_handler
463|
464| App\Service\Adriana\Command\ContractCommandService:
465| arguments:
466| $kernelDebug: '%kernel.debug%'
467|
468| App\Service\Adriana\Handler\SuggestionTurnHandler:
469| tags: [{ name: adriana.turn_handler, priority: 1 }]
470|
471| App\Service\Adriana\Handler\GuiaHelpTurnHandler:
472| tags: [{ name: adriana.turn_handler, priority: 2 }]
473|
474| App\Service\Adriana\Handler\MemberResearchTurnHandler:
475| tags: [{ name: adriana.turn_handler, priority: 3 }]
476|
477| # Painéis SSMA precisam rodar antes do WorkflowTurnHandler genérico (45).
478| App\Service\Adriana\Handler\SsmaPanelFeedImprovementTurnHandler:
479| tags: [{ name: adriana.turn_handler, priority: 48 }]
480|
481| App\Service\Ssma\SsmaPanelFeedImprovementChartRenderer:
482| arguments:
483| $projectDir: '%kernel.project_dir%'
484|
485| App\Service\Adriana\Handler\PayrollPanelAnalyticsTurnHandler:
486| tags: [{ name: adriana.turn_handler, priority: 46 }]
487|
488| App\Service\Adriana\Handler\AdrianaIntroTurnHandler:
489| tags: [{ name: adriana.turn_handler, priority: 4 }]
490|
491| App\Service\Adriana\Handler\SsmaPanelAnalyticsTurnHandler:
492| tags: [{ name: adriana.turn_handler, priority: 47 }]
493|
494| App\Service\Adriana\Handler\SsmaTurnHandler:
495| tags: [{ name: adriana.turn_handler, priority: 59 }]
496|
497| App\Service\Adriana\Handler\AtaTurnHandler:
498| tags: [{ name: adriana.turn_handler, priority: 10 }]
499|
500| App\Service\Adriana\Handler\ContractTurnHandler:
Note: Results truncated to 500 lines. Please narrow your line range.
Request #39
deepseek-v4-flash
P:115.72K C:2.58K CR:107.78K CW:0
22650ms
Reasoning
The App\ resource auto-registers classes in src/, so the new service is autowired. OK.
Now, we have limited time. Let me settle on new findings after careful review. I'll consider the code we reviewed.
Let me re-check something potentially problematic that hasn't been flagged: In `AutomationExecutionService`, the `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` is added to a `match` expression on `$action['type']`, but the action registration in the YAML is under `actions.movement`. Note there's already a dispatch for `create_processo_seletivo`. OK.
Now examine a subtle bug: `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` begins by checking `$member->getSourceType() !== 'offboarding'`. The flow members for offboarding flows are created per product with source_type 'offboarding'? When a flow template for offboarding is used, the created members' sourceType? Typically flow instance members created for a specific product offboarding might have sourceType 'offboarding'. Actually offboarding product slug is 'offboarding'. It is plausible.
But here's a thought: The action could run on 'employee_enters_stage' of the FINAL stage. At the time the member enters the final stage (the member is moving), its `sourceType` set 'offboarding'. OK.
Now, there is a chance the member is entering stage 3 but still in the same offboarding instance; the data is fine.
Let me now consider the confirmed finding #3 about changed dismissal date duplicate pending draft. Because of the metadata eventId link, if the draft was created by this automation earlier, the metadata will link to it (event id) so it's reused even if date changed (metadata path, findEventLinkedToOffboarding matches by eventId, ignoring date in eventMatchesContext). The duplicate issue arises only when the draft was created OUTSIDE the automation (manual) AND the date changed. Since this is a draft created manually via saveEventS2299; automation attempts findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal for non-pendente (none) then findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal with dismissal date mismatch → won't find because it requires dtDeslig equal new date or null. Since draft has old date, not reused → creates duplicate. Confirmed.
Now I will scan other pieces not confirmed. Let me search the new automation function usage of config `motivoDesligamento`, etc. There may be an issue where these fields in `buildDraftPayload` derive from the automation config. But the YAML/migration does not permit configuring these fields (has_config false). So they will always be ''. Then applyPayload on the initial draft sets only the dismissal date & nothing else. Then the draft is mostly empty — the responsible still must manually fill. This matches "pré-preenchido para revisão". OK.
Now, examine the missing pieces: `payload['_offboarding']['reason']` stored in metadata but not applied to event (mtvDeslig stays null). Possibly offboarding reason code maps to mtvDeslig? They put reason but don't map to motivo. Fine.
Now, look at the chat/notification text includes reviewButtonHtml in the e-mail body but not chat; requirement says review details in chat with Adriana. OK.
Now, let me investigate the possibility of a NEW specific issue: **`executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` uses `$this->router` (RouterInterface) only via the fallback draft service instantiation?** Actually real service injected via setter from container constructed with router (autowired). `OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService` constructor `?RouterInterface $router = null` autowire injection of router service by type. RouterInterface is resolvable (router service implements it). So DI builds with router. Good.
Now, is `AutomationExecutionService` ever constructed in a context where the setter for the draft service is not invoked but draft service fallback needs `$this->router`? Fallback uses `$this->router` property; if AutomationExecutionService was instantiated without router (router param null), the draft service gets null router and uses fallback path '/my-company/member/{id}' — fine.
Alright.
Now consider **the migration seeding flow_activities activity_type 'activity'** versus what the automation `all_activities_completed` expects for counting progress: Offboarding member activities progress stored per activity; activity type might matter. If the activity has no offboarding_activity_type_id, can the front create activities for an offboarding? This is template seeding: users will later customize by adding activities through the UI. The seeded generic activity named 'Offboarding' probably acts as placeholder.
Given time constraints, I'll look for one more candidate in the test to ensure it doesn't introduce new bug.
Actually, we should check possible DB/type mismatch introduced by entity: repository's saveEventS2299 line 81-82 passing $data['percAliment'] (which may be numeric string from controller), and now setter ?string keeps raw string. Then the XML builder may use percaliment for S-2299 with decimal. Since data from controller could be "12,50" (comma), the stored value in DECIMAL column via Doctrine string "12,50" — MySQL stores 12.50? Actually inserting '12,50' into DECIMAL(10,2): MySQL parses number up to non-numeric; yields 12.00. So data corruption for comma-formatted decimals IF the controller passes comma format. But this is outside the changed code? Actually saveEventS2299 is unchanged except line 78. The type change at entity setter signature is a changed API but property retains raw data; if previously the value passed was an int (e.g., after some conversion) and now it stays string "12,50" → DB insertion yields different result (12 instead of 12.50)? Wait previously the setter expected int; "12,50" string in non-strict file coerces to 12 (int) → stored as 12.00, losing .50. So both old and new lose fraction if comma format; if dot format "12.50", old code coerces to int 12, losing .50; new stores 12.50 correctly. So change improves.
OK.
Let me examine the changed entity file's property also: there's no getter conflict. Fine.
Now, let me check the diff for templates changed in other files (not in review group), skip.
Given confirmed findings already flag the migration's down() incompleteness and service issues, I should still do a careful pass per file and may not find new issues. But let me search for one more potential NEW bug: In `AutomationExecutionService` new code, they compute `$notificationTitle`/`$notificationMessage`/`$notificationMessageHtml` regardless; then when existing_not_editable they override; when missing not empty override. But for the case where eventStatus is 'draft_only' AND missing empty (impossible) ... skip.
There's another subtlety: **They notify the responsible even when the action is skipped because esocial disabled?** That early-return happens before try. OK.
**The action returns success false if esocialTrabalhador found but responsible not resolved?** Actually order: responsible resolution BEFORE worker data check. Wait re-read:
```
$offboardingMember = ...
$companyMember = ...
$responsible = resolve...
if (!$responsible) return error
$esocialTrabalhador = repo->findOneBy...
...
```
So even when the worker's esocial data is missing, they require the responsible resolved. If no responsible found, returns error 'Responsável... não encontrado' and no notification. Acceptable.
Now about cross-company leakage of events: `createDraftEvent` sets company from flow member's flow instance; safe.
Now consider one more possible NEW issue in migration: In `down()`, template is set is_active=0, but the `ensureTemplate` in `up()` selects template by `seed_migration` in settings — after down it's removed, so up creates a NEW template and seeds again (duplicating structures) even though the first template remains (disabled) with its stage structures & automations intact. That's exactly confirmed finding #1's later part.
New issue maybe: **`down()` also fails to remove the `flow_template_products` rows created, and leaves a flow template product link for a disabled template.** same scope.
OK.
Let me verify whether there is an additional real issue: the migration `up()` inserts the 'create_processo_seletivo' automation on 'on_offboarding_complete' (final stage) which would run when the offboarding is completed (member exits last stage). But the S-2299 draft creation automation is on 'on_enter' of the final stage, i.e., BEFORE completion. That means the draft is created at the moment the member enters the final stage and then updated only if... Hmm, but `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` reads the dismissal date at the time of entering stage 3. If the dismissal date changes later (after member is in stage 3 and before offboarding completed), no re-run triggers unless member leaves and re-enters the stage, because action allowed only for 'employee_enters_stage'. So the final draft in metadata may hold a stale dismissal date if date changed while member already in final stage.
Actually findEventLinkedToOffboarding with metadata event id would update draft on subsequent executions... but there may be no subsequent executions. Wait, is the action re-executed when the automation is re-evaluated per trigger events only? This means once the member entered final stage with an outdated dismissal date, and then the offboarding dismissal date is changed, the S-2299 draft's dtDeslig would remain the old date (since nothing re-triggers) — unless the stage re-entry occurs. Hmm, but maybe offboarding completion triggers all stage automations with condition on_offboarding_complete? Not on_enter.
This is a genuine design limitation, but it mirrors the decision to only allow on_enter. Might be intended: only create a draft when entering final stage with whatever current data. If user changes the date later, they can re-run by editing? This may be acceptable because the responsible reviews and can correct manually before sending. But is there a risk that an incorrect S-2299 draft with an old dismissal date is sent? The responsible reviews it, so mitigated.
I think this is worth a low/medium note? But given precision over recall, maybe skip.
Now, I should consider the more concrete code issue: **When there is an existing draft linked via metadata AND the worker data is missing on a re-run** — Actually re-run requires event to be pending; metadata path only invoked if both worker & remuneration found. If worker data removed (unlikely), skip.
Let me now verify the only genuinely suspicious NEW item I have so far is the possible dead-end when worker data missing (metadata-only record, notification says "Complete os dados e abra o chat com a Adriana"), but no mechanism to re-run the automation after data completion. Let's search whether esocial worker data completion triggers automation re-evaluation for the offboarding product (e.g., an on_data_complete trigger or service that re-runs stage automations when esocial data saved). If there is such re-run mechanism, then missing data scenario resolves. Search for something like 're-run' or executeAutomation on esocial data save or events for EsocialDadosTrabalhador. This is relevant to whether this is a bug. But the review scope time is limited; I'll search quickly.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "saveEventS2299"}
Result
File: config/routes.yaml Match lines: 1 1526| controller: App\Controller\CompanyMemberController::saveEventS2299 File: src/Controller/CompanyMemberController.php Match lines: 2 527| public function saveEventS2299(Request $request): Response 548| $event = $em->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)->saveEventS2299($esocialTrabalhador, $data, $company, $remuneracao); File: src/EventSubscriber/AdminPermissionSubscriber.php Match lines: 1 276| 'saveEventS2299' => [ File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php Match lines: 1 63| public function saveEventS2299($esocialDadosTrabalhador, $data, $company, $dadosRemuneracao): EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 1 15003| // via saveEventS2299) para o mesmo colaborador/data, evitando S-2299 duplicado. File: src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php Match lines: 1 203| * inclusive os criados fora desta automação (ex.: salvos manualmente via saveEventS2299 na File: tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php Match lines: 1 280| // Rascunho pendente criado manualmente (ex.: saveEventS2299), sem vínculo no sourceMetadata.
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "executeAutomation("}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 2 236| public function executeAutomation(FlowAutomation $automation, ?FlowInstanceMember $member = null, array $context = []): array 4370| $result = $this->executeAutomation($automation, $member, array_merge([
Request #40
deepseek-v4-flash
P:118.78K C:2.46K CR:118.27K CW:0
20409ms
Reasoning
Time to wrap up analysis. Given the confirmed findings already cover the biggest issues (migration down incomplete, god-object, date-change duplicate, status-based classification), let me consider whether there are any NEW distinct issues worth reporting.
Let me think again about the `OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService::findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal` (confirmed #4 already covers status != pendente). And #3 covers pending date change.
What about `findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal`: if dismissalDate is null, matches any pending draft for worker/remuneração — could reuse a draft for an older offboarding dismissal (same worker). If the worker was dismissed previously (a previous offboarding) and the draft for that previous dismissal still pending, and a NEW offboarding for the same employee starts (second offboarding) with no dismissal date yet, the automation would reuse the OLD pending draft from the previous offboarding and update its data/notification, mixing dismissals. Since a worker may be offboarded twice (rehired + offboarded), pending drafts from a previous offboarding could be wrongly updated. That is similar to confirmed #3 (single pending draft for same worker+remuneração). Might be beyond.
Let me check whether other new potential issue: **`findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal` also matches drafts with `dtDeslig IS NULL`** even when the current dismissal has a date. If there is an older pending draft without a date (from a previous offboarding where date never filled) and the current offboarding has date X, both the older (date NULL) and any current match. It picks max id (DESC) — likely the older, unless the current draft exists. If the current automation created its own draft earlier, metadata link handles it. Manual older draft without date could be reused incorrectly when a new dismissal occurs. It's a real edge but overlaps with confirmed #3 in essence.
Now, decide final set of NEW comments. Let me re-examine the diff of `config/services.yaml` and `config/automations/offboarding.yaml` since those files need their own passes, and tests.
YAML: no spelling issues in keys. Everything consistent.
config/services.yaml: adds setter call referencing a service class that is auto-registered. Fine.
Now, the migration file — any issue NOT already flagged? Let me thoroughly think about `ensureTemplateProduct` returning void and `template_type` string 'fixo'. If the product slot_index already used by another template (multiple templates) — the query looks for flow_template_products for this templateId & product & slot_index 0; if an existing row has slot_index 1 but not 0, inserts a new row at slot 0 (creating duplicate product link). Guard only prevents duplicates at slot 0. Multiple product links with different slot indexes for the same template/product would be inconsistent. But given fresh template, no row exists; fine. Re-run idempotent.
Now consider **the migration seeds only templates for companies that already have a workflow with slug 'fluxo-de-saida'**, but the workflow row for 'fluxo-de-saida' might be created per company; companies that don't yet have that workflow won't get a template. That's intended per docs (eligible companies with workflow de saída existente). OK.
Let me check the docs/database-changes file exists? docs/database-changes/2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template.md existed in search results (yes referenced). So documentation requirement satisfied.
Now, since the user's checklist says to review "regressões funcionais, segurança, isolamento por empresa, integridade de dados, migrations, testes e problemas introduzidos pelo diff", and given already confirmed findings, I should also look at the tests' validity (they mock lots; fine) and possible missed scenario.
Wait — maybe there is a NEW and important bug: **In `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, the flush is performed even when nothing changed; and the notification is dispatched even when `$eventStatus === 'existing_not_editable'` which is fine. But when missing data, they still attempt to notify via executeNotify with the missing-data message and include the review button. Fine.
What about when `$this->getOffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService()` fallback builds `new OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService($this->entityManager, $this->router)`. But when using the injected service (normal path), the service was built by the container with the real router. Both are fine.
Potential NEW functional bug: **When the member is in a flow whose sourceType is 'offboarding', the new action's guard passes. But the automation created by the migration is attached to a flow TEMPLATE; when a real flow instance is created from this template, are automations copied from template's flow_automations to the instance with trigger type on_enter?** The migration inserts flow_automations with flow_stage_id referencing a template stage and flow_template_id NULL. Whether these are copied to instances by a service (like OffboardingInstanceHandler) depends on code reading template automations at instance creation. Existing Version20260518151423 does the same for template automations, so presumably the platform copies automations from templates to instances.
Let me quickly check `OffboardingInstanceHandler` or flow instance creation to see how automations are copied and if 'on_enter' actions for final stage are executed when a member is created there. Not needed.
Now, before finalizing, let me examine whether a NEW issue exists in **`resolveEsocialS2299Responsible` when the configured responsible is in another company — they reject; then fallback to flowResponsible which is flow instance's. But if flowResponsible belongs to same company OK.
Now what about `offboardingMember->getOffboarding()?->getOffboardingFlowResponsible()` - is that the offboarding flow responsible? In the fixture they call setOffboardingFlowResponsible. OK.
So my conclusion: most significant issues were flagged. For remaining NEW findings to report, I have candidates:
A. **When eSocial data (worker/remuneração) is incomplete at the moment the member enters the final stage, the automation only records metadata and sends a "dados pendentes" notification; since the action is only triggerable on employee_enters_stage, filling the data later won't re-run it, so the S-2299 draft may never be created without manual re-execution.** Is that a bug? Let me verify if saving esocial worker data triggers automations re-evaluation. Search quickly for how esocial data saving interacts with automation re-evaluation, e.g., 'notify_esocial_worker_data' triggers, or events. Might be speculative.
Actually maybe simpler and more objective: the metadata stores `esocialS2299Draft` and marks eventStatus 'draft_only', but if the member later leaves and returns to the final stage, re-run would happen and find existing pending? none. It'd create.
Hmm, this issue might be intentionally handled via chat with Adriana: the user asks Adriana to create. Speculative.
B. **Repository setIndPagtoApi change** — is it correct? In saveEventS2299, when `avisoPrevioIndenizado` is '0' string? Wait, the eSocial field indPagtoAPI (indicador de pagamento em aviso prévio) valid values are S/N. Where does data come from? Probably a checkbox in the form 'avisoPrevioIndenizado' can be bool true/false or 'on' etc. New handling: 'on' (checkbox) → 'on' ? 'S':'N' = 'S' good. '' → null. false → 'N'. But `'0'` → 'N', which effectively false, correct.
One potential subtle bug: If the checkbox is submitted as 'false' string (common in JSON API), `'false'` is truthy → 'S'! Old code same problem? Old code `$data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N'` with 'false' string also truthy → 'S'. So not a regression.
So no new finding there.
C. **Cross-file inconsistency: EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino still uses `?int` getters while EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento now uses `?string`.** Not within review group (S2399 not in diff).
D. **Potential NEW issue in migration: the seeded `flow_automations` includes actions with `action_config` referencing 'to' => 'flow_responsible', and `conditions` with `type` on_enter but no `config` values; consistent with others.
E. Another candidate: the migration hardcodes `activity_type 'activity'` and names 'Offboarding'; but offboarding flow templates likely need to use `offboarding_activity_type_id` so that progress is measured per "atividade do offboarding" type? Since the whole point of stage automations `all_activities_completed` with activities progress depends on activity mapping to member's offboarding activities progress keys. If activity lacks offboarding_activity_type_id, automation 'Criar processo seletivo ao concluir offboarding' and 'Avançar ao concluir 100% das atividades' might still work if the automation counts tasks generally. Not certain; skip.
F. **In migration up(): for each workflow row, ensureOffboardingStages($templateId, $productId) inserts stages, but the product column in flow_stages is set to offboarding product id; the flow template has also product link (flow_template_products) for offboarding product. However the same workflow might host multiple products (onboarding+offboarding templates) and the template's flow_stages for other products have different product ids. When seeding into a company's workflow that already has an offboarding template? ensureTemplate creates NEW template for the workflow with seed marker only if none; fine.
Given the confirmed findings and the instruction "Do not repeat them," and that remaining candidates are mostly speculative, I need to be careful about over-reporting.
But wait — the review rules for tests: "Se a PR alterou comportamento e não trouxe teste novo/atualizado cobrindo esse comportamento, sinalize como pendência". Let's verify that the behavior changed in `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` type change (int→string getters) and repository indPagtoApi null-handling are covered by tests in this PR? The tests cover the automation/service paths but do they cover repository indPagtoApi null/empty handling and entity getter types? There's a test? Let me search the diff files for repository test of saveEventS2299. There's `tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/...` (other file). Not here. The repository's behavior change (handling null/empty avisoPrevioIndenizado → null) is not covered by new tests in this PR? There might be existing tests. But a "commit" says "fix(repository): enhance logic for setting IndPagtoApi...". And the PR does add extensive service tests. Let me check if there's any existing repository test for saveEventS2299. Search tests for 'saveEventS2299'.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "saveEventS2299|getIndPagtoApi|setIndPagtoApi"}
Result
No matches found
Request #41
deepseek-v4-flash
P:121.26K C:1.99K CR:121.22K CW:0
17003ms
Reasoning
Interesting: no tests covering saveEventS2299 indPagtoApi. That behavior change lacks a test. But a test-gap finding is lower priority; not critical (no auth/money). Could note as "Atenção" pending. But given we have rules "Mudança de comportamento precisa de teste automatizado cobrindo o fluxo real" — worth a small note? The changed repository line is behavior change (null handling). Not a big regression though. Could mention as a test gap in the repo comment. However, given confirmed list already substantial and the instructions say focus primarily on actual code logic/functionality and only report defects likely real, a test-gap for repository change might be legitimate but low value. I'll consider including it with low severity as part of the repository comment.
Let me also examine the `OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest` big test file to look for problems:
- The test constructor uses `new AutomationExecutionService($em, new MockHttpClient(), null, new NullLogger(), null, null, null, null, $this->router())`.
- Real DI: The container builds AutomationExecutionService with many constructor args via autowire (typed). Since optional typed arguments are autowired. But wait: `AutomationExecutionService` constructor uses `?RouterInterface $router = null` param named `$router`. In the test they pass router at 9th position. OK.
- But what about `httpClient`? They pass MockHttpClient; actual DI autowires HttpClientInterface. OK.
Test code uses `MockHttpClient` from Symfony Http Client component - constructor requires array of responses or transport? Actually `new MockHttpClient()` no args OK.
Now, in tests, they mock `EntityManagerInterface` and repos; fine.
Now, let's decide what NEW comments to file.
Given the previously confirmed list, I want to ensure I don't re-report. They include:
1. Migration down() cleanup incomplete → do not repeat.
2. AutomationExecutionService executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft god object → do not repeat.
3. findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal date-change duplicate → do not repeat.
4. findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal status-based classification → do not repeat.
Potential NEW issues:
NEW-1: **`OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService::findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal` reuses any pending draft when the dismissal date is NULL, including drafts from a previous offboarding of the same employee (worker rehired and dismissed again), since query only filters company+worker+remuneração (+ dtDeslig IS NULL). If a previous offboarding left a pending draft with no date, a new offboarding with no date yet could silently update the old draft.** Hmm, but same worker+remuneração - the remuneration entity may differ per offboarding? Actually EsocialDadosRemuneracao is tied to trabalhador; for a new contract (rehire), a new EsocialDadosTrabalhador/admissão record likely created → new remuneration record, so old draft's remuneração wouldn't match. So maybe low risk.
NEW-2: **`executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` never creates the S-2299 event when worker/remuneração data is incomplete, and no re-run trigger exists after data becomes complete.** It leaves user with just notification. That's functional gap/dead-end; but Adriana can guide. Given uncertain, maybe skip or medium.
NEW-3: **Email body link for "Revisar desligamento eSocial" points to `my_company_member_manage` route with `?esocialTab=desligamento` even when the responsible may not have permission to view that member's esocial tab (company member permissions)?** not necessary.
NEW-4: Entity getters changed `?int`→`?string` for decimal columns in S2299, but a sibling class `EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino` remains int (and would crash for non-null decimals). But that's out-of-scope file not in review. Could point out inconsistency? not in review files; instructions say never comment on files outside review_files.
NEW-5: In `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, the `$metadata['esocialS2299Draft']['eventId']` second flush only after first flush; this logic is fine.
NEW-6: `decimalOrNull` for vrAlim will output, e.g., '1500.00'. Stored in DECIMAL. Good.
NEW-7: **In AutomationExecutionService new code path, when eventStatus == existing_not_editable, they still include `reviewButtonHtml` which links to member's esocial tab where an official event exists — fine.
NEW-8: In `executeNotify`, the message_html (with the review link) is used as the email body, but NotificationSpecialist (in-app popup) message is plain text without link; NotificationsCenter button URL hardcoded to '/chat?adriana=1'. Fine.
Given all that, maybe the only other notable NEW and non-speculative issue is the repository change missing test coverage plus a subtle one: The changed entity getter/setter types (string) and the repository now pass `$data['percAliment'] ?? null` raw values into a string setter — combined with `OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService::applyPayload` using decimalOrNull for the same entity fields. If a manual saveEventS2299 (form) sends percAliment like "12,50", it now stores a "12,50" string into DECIMAL column → in MySQL, inserting string '12,50' into DECIMAL truncates at the comma: value 12.00. Before the entity type change, setPercAliment(?int) coerced "12,50" to 12 (int). Same stored 12.00. So no worse.
OK, I'll dig into the actual real behavior that may break: the old getter type was `?int`; repository `saveEventS2299` set `setPercAliment($data['percAliment'])`. If `$data` contains float (e.g., 12.50) from JSON, previously coerced int 12; now string '12.5'. Column decimal fine.
I'm fairly convinced the main real issues have been reported already. Let me nevertheless produce new findings for:
1. **Repository indPagtoApi null-handling behavior change has no test coverage** (test gap) - low/medium.
2. **Missing re-run trigger after eSocial data completion** - medium? Possibly.
3. **`OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService` new draft persists but never flushed when missing data? not.
Let me search one more thing: does `OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService` produce a draft event that will actually be persisted if worker data missing? No event. OK.
Actually, wait — There might be a more serious NEW bug regarding **`EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::setUpdatedAt` on an existing pending draft found via metadata but never persisted (detached?) — they persist anyway.
Let me also double check the `AutomationExecutionService::executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` early esocial-disabled check: `$company->getEsocialMode() === null` skip. Good.
Potential NEW bug: **If `$member->getFlowInstance()` is null, company null → skip esocial_disabled; Actually company null and mode null? `$company = $flowInstance?->getCompany(); if (!$company instanceof Company || $company->getEsocialMode() === null) return skipped` — if flow instance null → company null → skip with reason esocial_disabled even though there is no flow. Edge; not realistic.
Let me re-evaluate a possible duplicated-notification bug: This action could be executed for every member entering the final stage, per member. Each gets notification. Good.
Now, let me read the diff hunk around line 7039 (system_sender config added to emailConfig) to be sure adding 'system_sender' at 7050 is in executeNotify's email config and not duplicated elsewhere.
Given confirmed #2 was about god-object in general, and they mention `system_sender` behavior changed only in chat for config; but is there a NEW regression for **payroll** existing notifications? Previously `$isPayrollSystemSender` checked sourceType payroll. New `$isSystemSender = config system_sender || payroll source`. For payroll source unchanged. For other source with system_sender true newly treated as system; previously system_sender had no effect (ignored) so all such messages were sent as direct messages from manager's user or shared channel. Changing them to assistant conversation may be a desired centralization (they commented 'centralização'). Did any existing code pass system_sender true before this PR? Let me search across code for `'system_sender'` usage to see if any existing notify config sets it true; if yes, this PR silently changes their routing behavior (maybe unintended side effect). Let's search.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "system_sender"}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 3 7050| 'system_sender' => $config['system_sender'] ?? null, 13918| $isSystemSender = filter_var($config['system_sender'] ?? false, FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN) 15087| 'system_sender' => true,
Request #42
deepseek-v4-flash
P:123.35K C:2.46K CR:123.14K CW:0
21141ms
Reasoning
Only usage of system_sender config is in this diff (new code). So no regression to existing notifications.
Now let's look at the other changed file `templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig` (not in review group) references. Skip.
Let me consider the overall conclusion and decide comments.
Before finalizing, let me revisit the migration to identify a NEW issue definitely not flagged: idempotency of `ensureWorkflowProduct` + `workflow_product_was_created` marker in rollback: Suppose the migration runs, seeds templates (creating workflow_products where missing), then down() deletes workflow_products row (since created), and up() again creates template with seed. Down again tries to delete workflow_products created in second up (also flagged true). fine.
But there is a NEW subtle issue: **If up() runs and the workflow already had a product link to offboarding created by an even older migration/template (i.e., the offboarding product was already linked), then down() sets workflow_product_was_created false and does not delete link — good. But ensureTemplate seeds the SAME template name 'Offboarding com eSocial (S-2299)' possibly duplicating another existing flow template with the same name created previously by product template defaults applier. If a company already had a flow template with the same name (from an earlier seed or from manual creation with identical preset name), the migration adds another one. It guards by seed_migration settings marker only, not by name. So duplicate template names possible. Actually would the platform allow duplicate template names in the same workflow? Possibly unique constraint not enforced. This can create confusion but not data loss. Might be acceptable.
Now, there's a serious data-consistency concern with **flow_stages seeding while template duplicated** etc. All covered by confirmed #1.
Now decide. Given I've not found obvious NEW blocking bugs beyond confirmed list, but there are a couple of plausible NEW medium/low issues. However instructions: "Favor precision over recall: report only defects that are likely real." Also the rules in user format specify we should comment in pt-BR.
Let me be strict with the guidelines for the tests file: They require tests covering integration real path. Tests here do use real service with mocks of infra. They simulate a lot. The scenario missing is repository behavior (saveEventS2299 indPagtoApi) test coverage. I could add a low-severity note. But is it meaningful enough? The rule says "Mudança de comportamento precisa de teste automatizado cobrindo o fluxo real, não apenas um helper isolado." The repo change is behavior change. I'd flag it as "Atenção".
Actually, wait: This repository change is part of the fix to allow null/empty avisoPrevioIndenizado. The absence of a test is a real gap but the PR added a large test suite for the automation path; they test 'S' handling (avisoPrevioIndenizado => 'S') in the service payload path via OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService, not repository. So a light comment is fair.
Now consider a NEW actual functional bug candidate that is defensible and in-scope:
**In `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, when a linked pending event exists (eventStatus 'updated') and the payload's `dataDesligamento` is empty (because the offboarding has no dismissal date yet), applyPayload early-returns null → keeps the old date on the event.** Not harmful.
**Duplicate official-event check only matches same company+trabalhador+remuneração+dismissalDate; if the official S-2299 was for the same dismissal but with a DIFFERENT data on the event (e.g., because the offboarding date differs slightly), a new pending draft would be created. covered by #3/#4 partially.
Let me look at one more file - the new service's `buildDraftPayload` returns 'dataDesligamento' '' when dismissalDate null. applyPayload dateOrNull('') → null → skip. Good.
Hmm, what about `booleanStringOrNull`: values 'S'/'SIM'/... maps. In test they pass 'S'. Good.
Now regarding **`OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService::cpfOrNull`** strips non-digits, fine.
Now regarding **`applyPayload` for `dtNascto`/novoCpf**: These fields only relevant when transfer titulo. Not our worry.
I think, besides the confirmed findings, the most valuable additional comment is about the **missing re-run trigger / dead-end when eSocial data incomplete**, but I need to be more certain this isn't handled by some other mechanism. Let me quickly search for triggers when EsocialDadosTrabalhador/remuneração is saved for offboarding member: maybe an action exists 'notify_esocial_worker_data' (exists) with trigger? Actually 'notify_esocial_worker_data' - type action that notifies when data filled. But no "on_data_complete" trigger. So the flow's draft creation is only on entering stage. If data missing at that moment, the draft is never auto-created afterward. Also no re-trigger after data completion. But then, in the notification, they instruct to open the chat with Adriana for review; possibly the user can ask Adriana to create. But the metadata has the payload already stored; no other code creates the event using stored metadata. So if the automation doesn't re-run, the event never exists and the S-2299 would need to be created manually in the esocial tab. This is a plausible functional gap that contradicts the promise "garantir que, ao chegar na etapa final, o sistema crie ou atualize um rascunho auditável" only when data present, but here data missing → message 'dados pendentes'. It's a deliberate design though: they can't create the event without worker data; and they notify. Whether re-run happens depends on whether stage entry re-triggers on data completion. Not in this PR. I'd rather not file speculative.
Let me instead verify a NEW actual bug in the migration: **flow_automations insert's `conditions` includes `'type' => 'on_enter', 'config' => []`; but the trigger yaml is employee_enters_stage 'type' => 'on_enter' with has_config false. For the seeded automation in stage 3, both conditions and actions use 'type' => 'on_enter'. The automation may also rely on trigger_type value equals condition type. OK.
Alright.
One more angle: the migration `up()` uses `ensureTemplate` that selects templates by JSON settings seed_migration. If `flow_templates.settings` is `NULL` for other rows, JSON_EXTRACT(settings...) returns null (no match). OK. If `settings` invalid JSON string in some row, MySQL JSON_EXTRACT returns NULL with warning (not fatal). OK.
Let's now examine the automation test file for a possible real inconsistency: In test `testCreateEsocialDraftMarksOfficialEventAsNotEditable`, they set officialEvent status 'enviado', and the flow order in entityManagerForEsocialDraft returns queryBuilderReturning(officialEvent) for first createQueryBuilder (findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal) then queryBuilderReturning(pendingDraftEvent=null) for second (findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal). Good.
In `testCreateEsocialDraftUpdatesExistingPendingEventFromMetadataWithoutOverwritingFilledFields`, they call entityManagerForEsocialDraft without officialEvent/pendingDraftEvent (defaults null); because metadata path uses repo->find for existing event id, no createQueryBuilder. Good.
Test `testCreateEsocialDraftCreatesPendingEventAndSendsChatAsAdriana` expects result['eventId'] 9001 — set in persist callback. Wait: the first flush occurs inside executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft; the persist callback sets id on event. Then second metadata flush. OK.
But note: In executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft, when the event is created, they call `$this->entityManager->persist($event)` then later flush. In the test's em mock, persist stores entity in $persisted and returns id. Fine.
However, does the new action's real code persist event BEFORE notification? Yes, flush first then notify. Actually the flush that persists the event occurs before executeNotify? Look: after metadata persist + flush, then if event instance, metadata updated + flush. Then notifications via executeNotify which persists NotificationSpecialist, chat, etc. Then executeNotify does its own flush. Good.
Now, could there be an ordering problem: For a newly created event with eventStatus 'created', metadata eventId set null initially; the flush persists event with id 9001 and member with metadata eventId null; then second flush updates metadata eventId 9001. Fine.
But what if `$event` is newly created and eventStatus 'created', then the member metadata contains eventId null between flushes? Transient; fine.
OK, final set of new comments (small and defensible):
1. Migration file - we might add a note that `down()` doesn't clean stages and automations → confirmed #1 already. Skip.
2. Repository: changed null handling lacks dedicated test (they added tests only at automation level, but that path uses new service `applyPayload`, not `saveEventS2299`). Also that repository method remains entirely untested (no matches found for saveEventS2299). Suggest a unit test. Low/medium; but per guidelines "suggest tests only for concrete changed failure modes involving coercion, boundary values..." null/empty handling is a boundary value change → test suggestion justified.
3. Service: The `findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal` OR null condition & date change → confirmed #3, skip.
4. Maybe add a note about dead-end on missing data? I'll include it as medium because it's a genuine, verifiable characteristic of the new flow (only on_enter trigger, no other mechanism in this PR re-invokes action; data-missing scenario is explicitly handled by this code with 'missing' metadata, yet nothing later completes the draft). However, I need to make sure there isn't some place that re-runs automations after esocial worker data fill. Let me search for where the missing-data notification flow may get re-run: There might be a dedicated action when esocial worker data are saved (CompanyMemberController saveEventS2299 route?) to run automations? Search for calls to executeAction with on data. Quick search for 'notify_esocial_worker_data' references to understand the model: There is an action notify_esocial_worker_data in yaml with description "Notificar preenchimento de dados do trabalhador e remuneração (eSocial)". Actually this is for when data has been filled. There's presumably an event when data filled that triggers action to move the member forward, etc. Let me search in the code where notify_esocial_worker_data is invoked and what triggers it. It may indicate there is an eSocial data saved → re-run automations mechanism for offboarding. Search 'executeNotifyEsocialWorkerData'.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "executeNotifyEsocialWorkerData|notify_esocial_worker_data"}
Result
No matches found
Request #43
deepseek-v4-flash
P:125.82K C:5.44K CR:125.7K CW:0
45655ms
Reasoning
Hmm no matches for executeNotifyEsocialWorkerData because function is defined in AutomationExecutionService but search returned no match? Wait we saw earlier at line 6902 `private function executeNotifyEsocialWorkerData`. code_search default searches maybe file limited? Earlier it returned it. Now with combined search with '|' it says no matches? Because I used search_text with pipe but didn't enable regex. Right! pipe is literal text here, so no match. Use separate search or regex.
Let me not chase further.
Given all, let me reconsider providing comments. Since the previous confirmed findings probably came from the same pass (this is a continuation), maybe they expect me to still provide a code_comment for new issues. If I don't find any meaningful new ones, calling task_done is fine. But the instructions say "If a code issue has been identified and confirmed, call the code_comment tool". So if none, call task_done. But the user expects me to review all files including smaller ones. Let me perform one more careful pass to ensure nothing else.
Re-examine the `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository` line 78 in context: `$event->setIndPagtoApi(isset($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado']) && $data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] !== '' ? ($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N') : null);` This is correct for intended behavior (null/empty → null, false/'0' → 'N', true/'1'/'S'/'on' → 'S').
Wait, subtle: If the value is `'0'` string, `'0' !== ''` true and `'0'` truthy? In PHP, string '0' is falsy! So '0' ? ... : 'N' → 'N'. Good. If value is 0 int → 'N'. Good. So '0' (checkbox unchecked, often serialized as '0') → 'N'.
But what about eSocial field semantics: `indPagtoAPI = S` quando houve pagamento do aviso prévio. If the form's checkbox default when unchecked is empty '' → null now. Previously, an empty unchecked field gave 'N'. For the eSocial XML, indPagtoAPI mandatory? If it's required, null would fail validation. But the S2299 record is only a draft pending; before sending, responsible fills. Actually saveEventS2299 from esocial tab manual; null might leave indPagtoAPI empty; if the schema requires it (it's part of infoDeslig; indPagtoAPI mandatory when aviso prévio?), sending without it would be invalid. But maybe the front always sends a boolean. Anyway, given the commit message explicitly wants null for empty (so form can distinguish unanswered), that's the intended fix. Not a regression to flag.
Now re-examine `Entity` file change: only method signatures changed; the properties remain dynamic (no types), so hydration fine; getters/setters string types.
Consider possible strictness: Since entity file doesn't declare strict_types, passing int to ?string setter coerces. Good.
Now for the `src/Service/AutomationExecutionService` new lines 15045-15052 (persist + flush pattern): Two flushes; first flush before event id available? Actually first flush also persists the event, so id available after. Then they update metadata eventId with event->getId() and flush again. That's just an extra flush. But wait: they already included eventId in metadata as `$event?->getId()` BEFORE first flush (null for new). After first flush, they set metadata['esocialS2299Draft']['eventId'] = event->getId(); then persist member and flush. Good.
Now there's a possible issue: They modify `$metadata` local variable AFTER the first flush by reading member->getSourceMetadata again (to include event id) — but the earlier code stored metadata before flush; after flush the object state's metadata field updated in memory already, so they can just read it back. Fine.
Now, is there a scenario where `$this->entityManager->flush()` inside executeNotify at the end also flushes the event a second time (no-op). Fine.
Let's look at whether `$member` metadata update could fail if `sourceMetadata` is stored as JSON in DB column large — payload includes everything; fine.
At this point, I'm leaning that the confirmed findings cover the substantial issues, and further new findings would be speculative or marginal. However, I must be careful about a possible NEW bug: **In the new method, when existing linked event (from metadata) is found to be NOT pendente (eventStatus existing_not_editable), they don't persist event, but the event's updatedAt was NOT modified; then they persist member. And they include in the return/notification. Fine.
Wait, one more: **When the official event exists, the event variable is the OFFICIAL one (found by findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal); if eventStatus existing_not_editable, the metadata is written with eventId = official event id and later the second flush block re-writes eventId with event->getId() (official). All good.
But consider event found as official existing_not_editable with official event status 'enviado', meaning S-2299 was already sent; the flow should maybe not keep the member... skip.
OK.
Let me also re-check `OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService::findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal`: condition `(event.dtDeslig = :dismissalDate OR event.dtDeslig IS NULL)` inside the same where clause; when a pending draft exists with old date and another manual draft with null date, picks max id.
Let's now consider one more thing in migration: `up()` obtains `$offboardingProductId` from products where slug 'offboarding' and active=1. Then workflowProducts ensures that offboarding product linked. But is offboarding the product that owns workflows 'fluxo-de-saida'? The workflow slug 'fluxo-de-saida' presumably is the offboarding workflow. Good.
Now, an important migration bug NEW not yet flagged: The migration inserts `flow_automations` with trigger_type 'on_enter' but flow_automations likely include a check constraint that `action_type` must be one of the known types at the DB level? If a DB CHECK constraint on flow_automations.action_type references enum values (no check in MySQL). Not an issue.
Since no check constraints in MySQL typically. OK.
Now decide: Do I file comments for NEW issues?
Let me think about severity of the possible "no re-run after data completion" issue again in terms of what the code does when a draft can't be created: The automation **silently returns success true** with eventStatus 'draft_only' and sends a notification "Dados eSocial pendentes... Complete os dados e abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar." Hmm — for a responsible user, they complete the data (esocial tab of the employee), then must "abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar". But there is nothing to review: no event exists. Unless Adriana re-executes the action. If nothing re-triggers, the S-2299 event never gets created by the system, contrary to the feature promise "garantir que, ao chegar na etapa final do offboarding, o sistema crie ou atualize um rascunho auditável". In real flows, at entry into final stage, worker data is usually already present (the notification action 'notify_esocial_worker_data' existing in the yaml suggests that offboarding relies on data having been filled in earlier stages). So the missing-data case is an edge where the system gracefully reports missing data. Given "no mechanism in the PR re-triggers on data completion" is a design limitation, it could be flagged as medium/functional. But I worry about being speculative.
I'll consider it a valid finding but at "medium" severity, focusing on observable consequence (draft never created & only a notification), and suggest an idempotent re-execution mechanism or handling.
Actually, wait — the chat with Adriana is the system assistant that can possibly call tools to create the S-2299 draft (metadata stored). Not verifiable. Let me skip this to avoid false positive.
Let me instead verify one thing that might be a real NEW bug: **In `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, the notification is sent even when the event creation path succeeded (created/updated) - good. But the automation result also returns success when esocialTrabalhador missing, which may be treated as automation success by the engine, marking the automation as executed and not retrying.** This could be a real issue if the automation engine records action as completed once it returns a result (success true). If worker data is later completed, the automation won't run again. Let's check how executeAutomation processes results: results returned and maybe persisted as action results with success flag. If success true, no retry. That would make the missing-data scenario a dead-end, consistent with my earlier reasoning. Not easily verified further.
Given the current confirmed findings plus limited returns, I think providing the two new minor findings (test gap for repository null handling; and the missing-data dead-end) with clear justification is reasonable, plus I should avoid repeating confirmed findings.
Wait — I need to also make sure each review file got its own pass. Files list:
1. config/automations/offboarding.yaml — YAML checked: no spelling issues; no comment.
2. config/services.yaml — setter injection OK.
3. migration — confirmed #1 (and #... nothing new beyond). But migration file was part of confirmed finding #1 only. I will not comment again.
4. Entity — type change fix; no comment.
5. Repository — test gap note (small).
6. AutomationExecutionService — confirmed #2 (god object). Also small NEW: missing re-run dead-end note? Might attach to the code of the executeCreate... Actually confirmed #2 is about the same method being huge (250 lines). The dead-end belongs to that method too. Adding a second comment on the same method with a different issue is fine (different finding), as long as it's not a repeat.
7. OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService — confirmed #3, #4. Anything new? Perhaps not.
8. Tests — check: Config test reads `$config['actions']['movement']`. Good. Service test heavily mocks; no DB changes; fine.
Given the "Do not repeat" instruction, adding comments on files that already have confirmed findings is only for NEW issues. Let me choose:
Comment A (medium) on AutomationExecutionService: missing-data scenario returns success and only notifies; nothing re-triggers creation after data completion → S-2299 draft may never be created automatically. This is based on code facts: action allowed only on employee_enters_stage (YAML allowed_triggers) and no other path persists event from stored metadata. It's arguably a real functional gap.
Hmm, but maybe the stage automations re-run each time a member is moved into the stage (e.g., if data gets completed, maybe some other automation moves member out/in). Since we can't prove re-run, the claim "may never be created" is inherently probabilistic. Might not be appropriate as a "bug". I'm uneasy.
Comment B (low/medium test gap) on repository: The changed null/empty handling of avisoPrevioIndenizado in saveEventS2299 is a boundary-value change without a test in this PR (repository had no tests at all). Suggest a unit test.
Both are modest. But guidelines also caution "Avoid commenting on correct code". Test gaps count as valid per user-specific rules ("Se a PR alterou comportamento e não trouxe teste novo/atualizado cobrindo esse comportamento, sinalize como pendência").
Actually, the PR DID bring extensive tests but they don't cover repository saveEventS2299's new null handling; they cover the automation path which also does setIndPagtoApi null handling? Wait the automation's service (OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService) has booleanStringOrNull handling for avisoPrevioIndenizado -> used in applyPayload path, tested indirectly ('S' case). The repository change handles a different caller (manual saveEventS2299). The repository method isn't covered. That's a genuine small gap. But is it within this PR's scope to test the repository? The repo change is in the diff; behavior altered; test absent. I'll mention as low severity (Atenção).
Let me also double-check whether there is any actual bug in the repository change worth flagging as medium instead of test-gap only: When the value is an empty string, they set null instead of 'N'. Could this regress the S-2299 manual creation when the checkbox was intentionally unchecked (no payment of aviso prévio), which previously produced 'N'? eSocial indPagtoAPI valid values 'S'/'N'. Semantically 'N' means the indicator is known: aviso previo was NOT paid (indenizado?). Actually indPagtoAPI = "Indicativo de pagamento do aviso prévio" S/N. When the form has no selection, old code defaulted to 'N' (assuming not paid), new code null (unknown). For XML sending, null might be invalid. But since the repository is used to build the draft before official send; before sending, the user can set the value. This might introduce a validation error later if left null when the schema requires the field. Yet the commit explicitly intends to distinguish null/empty from a set value (per commit message). So intended behavior; not flag.
Let me review the actual line diff once more: the setter has typed ?string and entity column string length 1 nullable true. So null is allowed in DB.
Alright, I'm fairly confident about the limited NEW findings. Let me also verify no typo in YAML key spelling in offboarding.yaml for the new action compared to other actions: keys: allowed_triggers, blocked_triggers, blocked_trigger_message, config_preset, description, has_config, icon, id, title, type. All consistent with other actions (e.g., delay_offboarding_visibility uses same keys). The earlier yaml also uses 'blocked_trigger_message'? Not shown, but likely. So no comment.
Let me search to confirm `blocked_trigger_message` key used elsewhere (consistent key name). And `config_preset` used elsewhere. Yes both appear.
Now, let me quickly check whether `flow_detail.html.twig` and `list_automations.html.twig` changes (outside group) require JS mapping keys for this new action; they were added per other_changed_files +1 lines each, mapping the title. Not in group.
I think we can finalize now: submit comments for:
1. Medium: Missing re-run/dead-end scenario? Decide to include since it could be seen as realistic — but maybe too speculative. Let me assess once more. The user said review "problemas introduzidos pelo diff". If worker data missing, the draft is never created; the metadata is stored. Then, when the user later completes worker data and goes to the "aba de desligamento", they'd see NO draft (because none was created). The notification told them to complete data and open chat; but nothing actually creates the S-2299. Actually, maybe the chat with Adriana uses stored metadata to create the event via a new Adriana flow not in this diff. Speculative.
I'll skip it because "favor precision over recall".
2. Low: repository null/empty handling lacks a unit test.
Hmm but as per instructions, they ask to only report if "issue identified and confirmed." Both are confirmed as characteristics, but are they "code issues"? The test-gap is a process note allowed by the user-specific rules for the tests file... but comment must target a file in review_files with existing_code lines; existing_code must be newly added lines. For repository, the newly added line is line 78. I can comment there.
Let me also scan for a NEW actual bug in the `OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService::buildDraftPayload` `'pensAlim' => $config['pensAlim'] ?? ''`. In applyPayload, pensAlim uses intOrNull so '' → null. Fine.
Now one more careful check of `applyPayload` **for `indPdv`**: `indPdv` is a domain code like 'S'/'N' for "programa de desligamento voluntário"; payload may be bool? uses stringOrNull which returns '1' as string '1'. setIndPdv expects ?string (length 1 column). '1' might exceed? Actually column length 1, value '1' fits. OK.
Let me also double check `setDtProjFimApi` forced? no.
OK final answer: I'll report:
1. (Low) Repository indPagtoApi behavior change not covered by test. Should I include? It's a valid process/test gap. Existing_code: the changed line.
Let me also possibly flag the medium dead-end issue? If I don't include it, maybe fine. But the whole purpose is a code review with findings; providing at least one or two small new findings is fine.
Let me also think about one more NEW bug that is defensible: **Duplicate events: In `findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal`, when dismissalDate is null, the query matches ALL pending drafts for the same worker+remuneração regardless of whether the draft belongs to a previous offboarding (data NULL, never completed). If the same employee is offboarded twice with the second offboarding lacking a dismissal date at final stage entry, the second run reuses (updates) the FIRST offboarding's draft.** Compared with confirmed #3 (date changed) — similar but distinct trigger: multiple pending drafts exist when dismissal date empty. Hmm this is essentially the same underlying "reuse by too-loose matching can pick a draft from another dismissal" issue; borderline duplicate of #3. Skip.
**NEW bug in `findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal` regarding `dadosRemuneracao` filter**: If the worker's EsocialDadosRemuneracao was updated (new record) since the official S-2299 was sent (with old remuneration record), the query won't match official event, and the automation would create a duplicate pending S-2299 for the same dismissal date & worker, even though an official event exists for a previous remuneration record. That would be a real duplicate risk: the official S-2299 for the same dismissal date already exists but tied to an older EsocialDadosRemuneracao row. Since EsocialDadosRemuneracao seems one-per-worker (findByTrabalhador returns single latest), remuneration is the current one. So the official event for a past dismissal at date X would have the same remuneration record? For a different (past) dismissal, the date differs, so no match anyway.
I'll finalize with small comments:
1. Repository test gap (low).
Actually, let me reconsider a truly meaningful NEW issue I may have overlooked: **The action returns `['success' => true, 'message' => 'Rascunho do S-2299 registrado; dados eSocial pendentes impedem criar o evento oficial']` when worker/remuneração missing — while NOTHING has actually been registered except metadata.** Not a bug per se.
**Notification duplicated when chat and email both include the reviewButtonHtml? Chat message is plain text; only email has HTML button.
Another overlooked NEW: In `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, they use `$reviewUrl = $draftService->buildReviewUrl($companyMember);` and include `htmlspecialchars($reviewUrl...)`. But the same `$reviewUrl` is also stored in metadata and returned in the array and used in the chat? Not used in chat.
**Potential info leak:** The e-mail body includes the HTML link to the member's eSocial tab, which is fine for the responsible.
**But note — the reviewUrl in the metadata is '/my-company/member/{id}?esocialTab=desligamento'. Storing an absolute/relative URL with member id is fine.
Alright, I will now file a small number of comments.
Wait — I want to double check whether `EsocialDadosTrabalhador::findOneBy(['companyMember' => $companyMember])` matches the actual property on the entity (used widely?). Search quickly the entity property name. In the tests, trabalhador created with setCompanyMember. Let's confirm the actual property name 'companyMember' exists on EsocialDadosTrabalhador. It was used in fixture setCompanyMember; search repository usage findOneBy(['companyMember'=>...]) other places to confirm relation. Not essential.
Let me now settle and produce final output. Given many confirmed findings were already provided, and to not fabricate, I might limit to the test-gap note and a possibly the migration doc? Actually docs exist.
Actually, hold on. Let me recheck one thing about the migration regarding **DocGuard** test requiring doc file; exists. OK.
Let me recheck the test file for `OffboardingAutomationConfigTest` referencing `$config['actions']['movement']`; we confirmed the new action is under movement. Good.
Now let's produce final comments.
Wait, let me reconsider whether I should file the "no re-run after data completion" as medium since this is the type of logic bug the reviewer would catch. Let me weigh: The feature intent (from PR background): "garantir que, ao chegar na etapa final do offboarding, o sistema crie ou atualize um rascunho auditável do desligamento eSocial para revisão do responsável." In the flow, the responsible/employee fills esocial worker data typically at earlier stage (there's the action 'notify_esocial_worker_data' whose description is "Notificar preenchimento de dados do trabalhador e remuneração (eSocial)"). Also the actual offboarding flow includes stages for preenchimento. If data missing at final stage, it's a genuine edge; but the automation still flags it. This isn't necessarily a "bug".
OK final decision: I will report:
- Repository indPagtoApi null-handling test gap (low) — actually the code review tool should target newly added lines; I'll target the repo diff line.
Hmm, but a test gap comment might be considered minor. The user-specific rules for tests emphasize missing test coverage. I'll include it.
Let me also think about filing a NEW medium issue regarding the duplicated flush & metadata? no.
Maybe a NEW genuine issue: **`OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService::decimalOrNull` uses `number_format` producing a comma-less dot decimal, but for `percAliment` (percent), values > 1 like 12.5 (12,5%) become "12.50". Good.
I'm done. Actually wait: There is one more possible real NEW bug worth confirming: **When `eventStatus === 'updated'` (reuse pending draft or link event) and the payload's `dataDesligamento` is forced to overwrite even if empty? applyPayload forceOverwrite only when value non-null. dateOrNull('') => null → skip. good.
**When reusing a manual pending draft (updated), the code sets only `setDadosRemuneracao` + `applyPayload` with onlyEmptyFields true, so existing fields preserved. But since dtDeslig is forced overwrite, if the offboarding dismissal date changed, it updates draft dtDeslig — that's consistent with design; for manual draft though, a responsible may have already set dtDeslig intentionally to reflect the real dismissal; force overwriting to the offboarding date could override manual correction. This is a deliberate design decision to reflect the offboarding source-of-truth (per comment). Fine.
OK, let me finalize with comments:
1. Repository indPagtoApi test-gap (low/medium?). Severity low.
Should I comment at all given "previously confirmed findings" were produced presumably by the same pass? The instructions say continue reviewing and report any other real issues you find. If nothing significant, I can call task_done with no new comments. But I found minor test gap.
Hmm. Let me also reconsider the entity type change: getters `?string` now return the raw string from Doctrine decimal (e.g., '12.50'). Consumers: FlowableVariablesService puts into template variables as string '12.50'. Before this PR, it typed ?int; but DB returns string and PHP would TypeError... unless FlowableVariablesService was never executed on non-null percaliment. So there could be a subtle regression: previously some code (e.g., twig template or JS) might have displayed percAliment as a percent integer 12 (since it was int in getter). Now returns '12.50'. Could that break a display expecting number? e.g., templates show "12%" etc. Search for percAliment in twig templates/ front usage.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "percAliment"}
Result
File: docs/Flowable/Tasks/formatters/esocial_s1200_campos_disponiveis.md
Match lines: 1
210| "percAliment": 50.00,
File: docs/Flowable/Tasks/formatters/esocial_s2299_campos_disponiveis.md
Match lines: 5
37|| `percAliment` | decimal | Percentual de pensão alimentícia | Não | 30.00 |
226|| `percAliment` | double | global | Percentual de pensão alimentícia |
355|4. **Pensão Alimentícia**: Os campos `pensAlim`, `percAliment` e `vrAlim` são usados quando há pensão alimentícia relacionada ao desligamento.
392|18. **Valores Numéricos**: Os campos numéricos (`pensAlim`, `percAliment`, `vrAlim`, `indRemun`) são retornados como inteiros ou decimais conforme o tipo, ou `0`/`0.0` se não disponíveis.
430|// - percAliment: 30.00
File: docs/Flowable/Tasks/formatters/esocial_s2399_campos_disponiveis.md
Match lines: 5
34|| `percAliment` | decimal | Percentual de pensão alimentícia | Não | 30.00 |
205|| `percAliment` | double | global | Percentual de pensão alimentícia |
323|3. **Pensão Alimentícia**: Os campos `pensAlim`, `percAliment` e `vrAlim` são usados quando há pensão alimentícia relacionada ao término do TSV. O campo `pensAlim` indica o tipo de pensão alimentícia:
361|16. **Valores Numéricos**: Os campos numéricos (`pensAlim`, `percAliment`, `vrAlim`, `indRemun`) são retornados como inteiros ou decimais conforme o tipo, ou `0`/`0.0` se não disponíveis.
397|// - percAliment: 30.00
File: docs/Flowable/Tasks/formatters/esocial_termination_events_campos_disponiveis.md
Match lines: 8
61|| `percAliment` | decimal | Percentual de pensão alimentícia | Não | 30.00 |
74|| `percAliment` | decimal | Percentual de pensão alimentícia | Não | 30.00 |
253|// "percAliment": null,
277|// "percAliment": 30.00,
315| "percAliment": null,
339| "percAliment": 30.00,
379| "percAliment": null,
403| "percAliment": 30.00,
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
Match lines: 5
52| private $percAliment;
204| public function getPercAliment(): ?string
206| return $this->percAliment;
209| public function setPercAliment(?string $percAliment): self
211| $this->percAliment = $percAliment;
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino.php
Match lines: 5
31| private $percAliment;
112| public function getPercAliment(): ?int
114| return $this->percAliment;
117| public function setPercAliment(?int $percAliment): self
119| $this->percAliment = $percAliment;
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
Match lines: 2
81| $event->setPercAliment($data['percAliment'] ?? null);
122| 'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2399EvtTsvTerminoRepository.php
Match lines: 2
78| $event->setPercAliment($data['percentualPensao']);
109| 'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),
File: src/Service/ESocialDataService.php
Match lines: 2
1078| $std->percaliment = $evento->getPercAliment();
1330| $std->percaliment = $evento->getPercAliment();
File: src/Service/FlowableServices/FlowableVariablesService.php
Match lines: 4
15208| $this->formatter->formatDouble('percAliment', $eventData['percAliment'] ?? 0.0, 'global'),
15284| $this->formatter->formatDouble('percAliment', $eventData['percAliment'] ?? 0.0, 'global'),
19737| 'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),
19792| 'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),
File: src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php
Match lines: 2
69| $this->applyPayloadValue(fn () => $event->getPercAliment(), fn ($value) => $event->setPercAliment($value), $this->decimalOrNull($payload['percAliment'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
117| 'percAliment' => $config['percAliment'] ?? '',
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/jsonSchemes/v_S_01_00_00/evtDeslig.schema
Match lines: 1
69| "percaliment": {
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/jsonSchemes/v_S_01_00_00/evtTSVTermino.schema
Match lines: 1
60| "percaliment": {
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/jsonSchemes/v_S_01_01_00/evtDeslig.schema
Match lines: 1
69| "percaliment": {
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/jsonSchemes/v_S_01_01_00/evtTSVTermino.schema
Match lines: 1
60| "percaliment": {
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/jsonSchemes/v_S_01_02_00/evtDeslig.schema
Match lines: 1
69| "percaliment": {
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/jsonSchemes/v_S_01_02_00/evtProcTrab.schema
Match lines: 1
350| "percaliment": {
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/jsonSchemes/v_S_01_02_00/evtTSVTermino.schema
Match lines: 1
60| "percaliment": {
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_00_00/evtDeslig.xsd
Match lines: 1
90| <xs:element name="percAliment" minOccurs="0" type="TS_percAliment" />
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_00_00/evtTSVTermino.xsd
Match lines: 1
106| <xs:element name="percAliment" minOccurs="0" type="TS_percAliment" />
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_00_00/tipos.xsd
Match lines: 2
3096| <!-- Campo {percAliment} -->
3098| <xs:simpleType name="TS_percAliment">
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_01_00/evtDeslig.xsd
Match lines: 1
92| <xs:element name="percAliment" minOccurs="0" type="TS_percAliment" />
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_01_00/evtTSVTermino.xsd
Match lines: 1
108| <xs:element name="percAliment" minOccurs="0" type="TS_percAliment" />
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_01_00/tipos.xsd
Match lines: 2
3330| <!-- Campo {percAliment} -->
3332| <xs:simpleType name="TS_percAliment">
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_02_00/evtDeslig.xsd
Match lines: 1
93| <xs:element name="percAliment" minOccurs="0" type="TS_percAliment" />
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_02_00/evtProcTrab.xsd
Match lines: 1
565| <xs:element name="percAliment" minOccurs="0" type="TS_percAliment" />
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_02_00/evtTSVTermino.xsd
Match lines: 1
109| <xs:element name="percAliment" minOccurs="0" type="TS_percAliment" />
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_02_00/tipos.xsd
Match lines: 2
3905| <!-- Campo {percAliment} -->
3907| <xs:simpleType name="TS_percAliment">
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_03_00/evtDeslig.xsd
Match lines: 1
93| <xs:element name="percAliment" minOccurs="0" type="TS_percAliment" />
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_03_00/evtProcTrab.xsd
Match lines: 1
577| <xs:element name="percAliment" minOccurs="0" type="TS_percAliment" />
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_03_00/evtTSVTermino.xsd
Match lines: 1
109| <xs:element name="percAliment" minOccurs="0" type="TS_percAliment" />
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_03_00/tipos.xsd
Match lines: 2
3977| <!-- Campo {percAliment} -->
3979| <xs:simpleType name="TS_percAliment">
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/src/Factories/Traits/TraitS2299.php
Match lines: 8
106| "percAliment",
107| !empty($this->std->percaliment) ? $this->std->percaliment : null,
619| "percAliment",
620| !empty($this->std->percaliment) ? $this->std->percaliment : null,
1138| "percAliment",
1139| !empty($this->std->percaliment) ? $this->std->percaliment : null,
1669| "percAliment",
1670| !empty($this->std->percaliment) ? $this->std->percaliment : null,
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/src/Factories/Traits/TraitS2399.php
Match lines: 6
88| "percAliment",
89| !empty($this->std->percaliment) ? $this->std->percaliment : null,
367| "percAliment",
368| !empty($this->std->percaliment) ? $this->std->percaliment : null,
656| "percAliment",
657| !empty($this->std->percaliment) ? $this->std->percaliment : null,
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/src/Factories/Traits/TraitS2500.php
Match lines: 2
1036| "percAliment",
1037| $des->percaliment ?? null,
File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial/desligamento.html.twig
Match lines: 1
251| percAliment: document.getElementById("percentualPensao")?.value || "",
File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_desligamento/pensao_alimenticia.html.twig
Match lines: 1
48| value="{% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.percAliment %}{{ prevEvts.desligamento.percAliment }}{% endif %}">
File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/pensao_alimenticia.html.twig
Match lines: 1
58| value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.percAliment %}{{ prevEvts.termino.percAliment }}{% endif %}"
File: tests/ESocialS2299EventTest.php
Match lines: 1
70| $this->std->percaliment = null;
File: tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php
Match lines: 2
164| 'percAliment' => '12,50',
188| self::assertSame('12.50', $event->getPercAliment());
Request #44
deepseek-v4-flash
P:134.45K C:3.46K CR:131.2K CW:0
28893ms
Reasoning
Interesting: template `desligamento.html.twig` (in `member_guides_esocial`, not `member_guides_esocial_termino`) references percAliment value input using prevEvts.desligamento.percAliment. Where does prevEvts data come from? Perhaps from event getters transformed elsewhere.
The change from ?int to ?string means values like '12.50' now available correctly, previously TypeError would prevent rendering the desligamento guide. But note there's a twig template change in other files for `member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig` (fixing the nrProcTrab access). Actually the "desligamento" tab uses `member_guides_esocial/desligamento.html.twig` with the prevEvts data referencing `percaliment` etc. The TypeErrors on `getPercAliment()` may previously break "Aba desligamento" for employees whose S2299 event had values. This PR fixes it (commit message says "Corrigido erro ao abrir a aba de desligamento quando prevEvts.termino ainda não existe", which is about nrProcTrab access guard). But the esocial tab uses getFlowableDataForTemplate? Actually CompanyController returns event data at lines 6373 etc. Not needed.
The entity fix seems coherent.
Now, given the confirmed findings and careful pass, finalize comments. I'll include:
1. Repository — new null/empty handling is a behavior change not covered by any automated test (repository method untouched elsewhere in PR test suite). (low severity, test category.)
2. OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService — Actually let me think of a distinct NEW service issue: **`applyPayload` overwrite for dtDeslig uses forceOverwrite regardless of whether this is a manual pending draft created outside the automation; if the draft's dtDeslig was set by the responsible as correct and offboarding's dismissal date is null (missing), nothing changes (skip due null). If offboarding date is present but different, overwrite. deliberate.
Let me reconsider whether the migration seeds automations incorrectly regarding `action_type` 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' when product's yaml action is 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' — good.
One more possible issue: **`ensureAutomation` deduplication key uses `name`, `trigger_type`, `action_type`. If the stage has two automations of the same action type and same trigger but different names, fine. But if the same automation (e.g., create_processo_seletivo) already exists in the template stage from a previous version with different name, it inserts duplicates. OK.
Also consider: The migration seeds for EVERY company with eligible workflow 'fluxo-de-saida', including staging/homologation DBs and production, creating a template per company. If there are thousands of companies, this migration inserts thousands of rows (stages/activities/automations x3 each) — could be slow/locky but still limited. Not relevant.
Now produce final comments.
Let me write final pt-BR comments:
Comment 1 (Repository, low/test): about no test for null/empty branch.
Actually let me reconsider reporting at all. If I include too trivial comments, might be noise. Since the rules favor precision and "Do not duplicate findings reliably enforced by tools..." It's fine.
Hmm, I'll also include a medium NEW issue about the action being added inside the giant method (already confirmed #2). Since confirmed #2 explicitly says the method (god object) is the biggest issue; repeating not allowed.
Let me think once more if there is any NEW critical bug: Let me carefully review the new action block once more for a subtle but concrete bug:
```
$metadata['esocialS2299Draft'] = [ ... 'eventStatus' => $eventStatus ... ]
```
$eventStatus is 'draft_only' initial. Then later they use $eventStatus to decide notification message: If missing non-empty, override. Fine.
**Consider the 'existing_not_editable' case when esocial worker/remuneração exists.** The code enters the else branch (both exist) and calls findEventLinkedToOffboarding(member...). If no linked event found by metadata, then `findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal` returns official event (if exists); status existing_not_editable. In that case `$eventStatus = 'existing_not_editable'`; `$missing` remains []; then notificationTitle etc overridden inside `if ($eventStatus === 'existing_not_editable')`. Then since missing empty, no other override. Notification "S-2299 oficial já existe e não foi alterado". OK.
**Consider official event found but for a DIFFERENT dismissal date than the offboarding's date.** findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal filters by event.dtDeslig = dismissalDate. So only matches when equal.
Now subtle: In the metadata-linked event case, the code calls `eventMatchesContext` and then:
```
if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $event->getStatus() !== 'pendente') {
$eventStatus = 'existing_not_editable';
} elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
... updated
} else {
$event = findExisting... (official)
...
}
```
Wait, there's a bug here: if metadata-linked event exists and IS pendente → updated; good. If metadata-linked event exists and NOT pendente → existing_not_editable. If NOT found by metadata (event null) → else branch finds official → if official found, eventStatus existing_not_editable; elseif find pending...
But here's the catch: **The `else` branch (event null from metadata) still executes even if a NEW event was created? No: In the branch where metadata-linked event is found but not pendente (official), eventStatus existing_not_editable and they skip persist — good.
Now, what if the metadata-linked event was deleted in DB (e.g., user removed a pending draft manually) → repo->find returns null → metadata branch null → else → find official (none) → find pending (maybe the user recreated) etc. OK.
Alright.
Let me also check the code that **filters pending drafts before official events**: they search official first (findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal) then pending. For an event status 'enviado' with an error that needs a corrective S-2299 (indRetif=2), the new automation sees official & blocks editing (confirmed #4).
There is one more subtle NEW potential bug in **executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft's second flush**:
```
if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
$metadata = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? [];
$metadata['esocialS2299Draft']['eventId'] = $event->getId();
...
}
```
If event was created and later `getId()` is null because flush didn't happen yet? First flush happened. OK.
**What if eventStatus is 'existing_not_editable' and `$event` is an official event found by `findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal`, they update metadata eventId. Later when re-run, metadata find loads that official event id → existing_not_editable again. OK.
Now regarding potential "missing event update" bug: If a linked pending draft exists (metadata), but the current dismissal date in the draft differs, they still treat it as updated and force-overwrite dtDeslig with the current offboarding date. Good.
Given all, I'll finalize:
- No new blocking bugs found beyond confirmed ones; I will file the one test-gap note (low) and a medium note about no automatic retry/creation after data completion? I'll decide to leave the dead-end out to avoid speculation.
Hmm, but if I file nothing, my overall contribution is just "task_done." The instruction: "If the current code review task is complete, call task_done." So not required to find something.
However, I should still apply careful per-file pass to the two test files and smaller files to confirm they're fine. Since I did per-file passes for everything and there are no additional real issues beyond those already confirmed, I can call task_done. But wait, maybe I should provide the test gap comment because it's concrete and legitimate and not repeated.
Let me reconsider: Rule in user-specific for repository file: "Método novo sem nenhum chamador visível no diff (dead code) deve ser sinalizado." Not applicable. "Mudança de assinatura ou remoção de método público exige conferir ... todos os chamadores foram atualizados." The entity getter/setter signature changed from ?int to ?string. Are there callers that set percAliment/vrAlim passing ints that would still be fine; and callers using getters as ints expecting arithmetic? e.g., some comparisons/conditional displays like `{% if ...percAliment %}`? no arithmetic. I checked usages, mostly pass-through. OK.
Given time, I'll add a final decision to include:
1. Repository test-gap (low). I'll place comment on the changed line.
Should I also include a note about entity getter/setter type change being only partial for S2299 vs sibling? not in review group.
Actually, wait — maybe there's a NEW more serious issue about migration `down()` setting template is_active=0 but never deleting, but the review's confirmed #1 already includes "se a migration for revertida e aplicada de novo (down + up), o up() não en..." (truncated). So that covers duplicates.
Let me finalize.
Actually, hold on. Let me quickly review the migration's up() `findActiveProductId('offboarding')` and the DOWN logic `delete wp FROM workflow_products wp ...` etc — but there's another subtle NEW thing: **Down deletes workflow_products row only if settings['workflow_product_was_created'] true. But if this template was created when workflowProductExisted false, but there is ALSO another active template of another product in the same workflow that depends on the offboarding product row? unlikely.
OK.
Also a potential NEW issue in the YAML: The new action is placed under `actions.movement` while semantically it's a "criar/notificar" action not a movement — but organizationally placed under movement section with trigger allowed; UI may group actions by key (movement) meaning actions that move/cause something. Not a bug.
Now produce final answer: since I have no confirmed new real bugs to report beyond previous findings, I'll give a concise summary of per-file review and call task_done. But I'll include the repository test-gap? The tool is for reporting code issues; a test gap is an issue (per repo rules). I'll include it as a comment with category "test", severity "low".
Let me make sure the existing_code snippet exactly matches diff added line:
`$event->setIndPagtoApi(isset($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado']) && $data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] !== '' ? ($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N') : null);`
Yes that's the added line.
Wait, is this line in diff newly added? In the diff: `- $event->setIndPagtoApi($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N');` `+ $event->setIndPagtoApi(isset(...)...);` yes added.
Now, do I want to file that comment? The behavior change (empty->null instead of 'N') is functionally meaningful, and there's no repository test. It's legitimate but mild. I'll include.
Additionally, I could file a low comment about the missing test coverage on the new automation edge "worker data missing yields no event but returns success" — but tests exist for the missing-data case, so fine.
Alright. Final: comment on repository; then task_done.
Hold on — before I finalize, let me be thorough about the one remaining potential real bug I was uncertain about: the dead-end when missing data. Let me do one targeted check to see if any code path re-executes automations when esocial worker data is completed (e.g., when saveDadosTrabalhador occurs for an offboarding member, does it trigger automation?). The action `notify_esocial_worker_data` description "Notificar preenchimento de dados do trabalhador e remuneração (eSocial)" — this is a yaml action type; when is it triggered? Probably trigger 'employee_enters_stage' plus after data fill? If triggers include something like "dados preenchidos"? Let's look at triggers in yaml lines 12-104: we saw notifications group has deadline, exit_date, any_activity, employee_enters_stage; movement group has all_activities_completed, plus days, offboarding_completed, days_after_start, days_in_stage? Let me view yaml lines 80-106 to list movement triggers. We saw them partially; blocked triggers list includes days_in_stage. There's no "dados eSocial completos" trigger. So the only way the esocial draft automation runs is stage entry.
I'll skip the dead-end.
Final answer time.
Let me now double-check whether the new service class's methods have correct visibility to call `event->setUpdatedAt` etc. fine.
One more: **`OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService` lacks a logger; errors in createDraft...? not used.
OK finalize.
Wait, I want to double-check the new setter injection line in config/services.yaml for AutomationExecutionService includes the router? Not needed, router already injected via constructor. The fallback `new OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService($this->entityManager, $this->router)`: `$this->router` is property of type RouterInterface set from constructor param. Good.
Now produce the output. I'll write a short summary in pt-BR plus the comment(s), then task_done.
Let me produce one code_comment (repository test gap). Should I also add the comment about no test for entity type change? Not necessary.
Given confirmed findings covered the heavy stuff, a concise wrap-up with maybe 1 low comment and task_done seems acceptable. Actually, since the user asked for professional review output of new real issues beyond the confirmed ones and there are none significant, I can simply state summary and finish. But adding the mild test-gap comment adds value while not being noise. I'll include it.
Let me write the comment with correct structure (Portuguese, direct, first sentence simple).
Tool Calls (1)
code_comment
Show Details
Arguments
{"comments": [{"content": "O novo tratamento de aviso prévio vazio/nulo (passar a gravar null em vez de 'N') muda o comportamento do saveEventS2299, mas não há nenhum teste cobrindo esse caminho no repositório — a suíte nova da PR testa o fluxo da automação (OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService), não o saveEventS2299 usado pela aba manual de desligamento. É um valor de fronteira (vazio, '0', false, 'S') com impacto direto no XML do eSocial; sugere adicionar um teste unitário para o repositório validando que vazio/null viram null e valores definidos viram 'S'/'N'.", "existing_code": "$event->setIndPagtoApi(isset($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado']) && $data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] !== '' ? ($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N') : null);", "category": "test", "severity": "low", "path": "src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php"}]}
Result
(async)
Request #45
deepseek-v4-flash
P:46.12K C:612 CR:42.24K CW:0
5151ms
Reasoning
I've completed my review pass across all files in the review group. Let me summarize the per-file review and finish.
Per-file coverage:
1. config/automations/offboarding.yaml — new action declaration; keys/spelling fine.
2. config/services.yaml — setter wiring fine.
3. Migration — idempotence/rollback issues already confirmed in previous findings (#1), rest OK.
4. EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php — ?int→?string type widening consistent with decimal values; usages checked.
5. Repository — noted behavior change; added test-gap comment.
6. AutomationExecutionService — god object issue already confirmed (#2); other behavior consistent with tests.
7. OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService — pending draft date-match issue (#3) and status treatment (#4) already confirmed.
8. Tests — well constructed; no new issues.
Call task_done.
Revisei todos os arquivos do grupo de review. Resumo da passada por arquivo:
- **config/automations/offboarding.yaml** e **config/services.yaml**: declaração da action e wiring do setter estão corretos; sem erros de chave/ortografia nos YAML.
- **migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php**: as pendências já confirmadas (rollback incompleto que não remove stages/activities/automations e risco de duplicidade em down+up) seguem válidas; demais rotinas são idempotentes.
- **EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php**: a ampliação `?int` → `?string` em `percAliment`/`vrAlim` é compatível com o novo serviço (`decimalOrNull`) e com os consumidores que apenas repassam o valor.
- **EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php**: comportamento alterado no `setIndPagtoApi` (vazio → `null` em vez de `'N'`) sem cobertura de teste — registrei comentário de baixa prioridade.
- **AutomationExecutionService.php** e **OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php**: concentração no god object (#2), falha no reaproveitamento de rascunho com data alterada (#3) e tratamento de qualquer status ≠ pendente como oficial (#4) já estavam confirmados; a lógica nova restante é consistente e coberta pelos testes.
- **Testes**: fixture e mocks bem isolados; nenhum problema novo identificado.
Nenhum defeito novo bloqueante foi encontrado além dos já confirmados.
Tool Calls (1)
task_done
Show Details
Arguments
{"state": "DONE"}
memory_compression_task
Request #1
deepseek-v4-flash
P:86.02K C:1.96K CR:384 CW:0
18603ms
Reasoning
We are further along. Let me recap:
Critical additional evidence for the type-change issue #2:
- CompanyMemberController declares `strict_types=1`.
- saveEventS2299: `$data = json_decode($request->getContent(), true);` — JSON decoded values.
- So if the frontend sends `percAliment` as a JSON number (e.g., 12.5) or `vrAlim` as number, then `setPercAliment(?string)`/`setVrAlim(?string)` receive a float/int, and with strict_types=1 in CompanyMemberController... wait, TypeError behavior depends on the *file where the call occurs*, not where the function is defined. The call is in Repository file which does NOT have strict_types=1 (we saw repository starts with `<?php` then namespace, no declare). Non-strict file: coercive typing applies at call site. If target setter expects ?string, passing float 12.5 → under non-strict coercion, float to string "12.5"? PHP coercive: float accepted and converted to string. So no TypeError in repository. Before the change, passing float 12.5 to ?int would also coerce to int 12 (non-strict). No TypeError. So changing from ?int to ?string with non-strict call site doesn't introduce TypeError; old code lost the decimals, new code preserves. So no regression.
BUT there is still a subtlety: previously the setters' ?int would coerce numeric strings to ints, losing precision ("12.50" → 12). The PR fixes that; the review plan marked as high issue "mudança de tipo causa inconsistência" — i.e., they thought changing getter/setter type while entity property type + DB type remain decimal could break. Given the entity mapping type is decimal (DBAL returns string), changing getters to ?string is the correct fix, not a bug. The only non-obvious case is other non-diff code that might rely on ?int return type... Search results show no other S2299 calls outside those files. Therefore, issue #2 from plan = false positive (actually an improvement). However, one real inconsistency remains: EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino still has the old ?int getters/setters for decimal columns — out of this diff's scope.
Now check the repository file: no strict_types. CompanyMemberController has strict_types but calls happen in repo file non-strict, so coercion semantics at call file (repo file) apply.
Wait—technically PHP type juggling: whether coercion or TypeError is determined by the file that made the call (CompanyMemberController? No—the call is `$this->getDoctrine()->getRepository(...)->saveEventS2299(...)`, inside repository method `saveEventS2299`, which is declared in repository file. `setPercAliment` call is inside repository file; that file has no strict_types, so coercion occurs). Thus no TypeError.
So: the type change isn't a regression; it fixes precision loss. Good—skip this finding. But wait another file changed by the commit: EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php getters changed. In the test they assert `'12.50'` equals event->getPercAliment() — given decimalOrNull pass. Consistent.
Now can we even report issue #2? The user's review of this conversation says don't repeat known correct code. I'm leaning to skip. But we can mention in "Tool Call Conclusions" that we verified this was not a bug — type aligns with Doctrine decimal (which returns strings), so no TypeError; old ?int was wrong. Good.
Let me confirm remaining checks needed before writing summary:
- Up/down migration lines: we already have view line ranges 80-180? We read diff but not the migration fully. Need to ensure down() exact behavior to articulate low finding. Let me read lines 80-480 quickly? It may not be necessary; the diff already included full down() and up(). We know from diff:
- down(): template = flow_templates by workflow's seed_migration value; if template found: sets is_active=0, removes seed key, adds rolled_back key, deletes automations? Actually from the diff, down did:
"DELETE FROM flow_automations WHERE flow_template_id=:templateId"? Hmm wait—we need to reread, because from the diff excerpt down() may indeed delete automations (a line existed "DELETE FROM flow_automations WHERE flow_template_id = :templateId"). Let me check: In the diff snippet for down() I wrote at outset: it includes many `DELETE FROM ...` for activity records, flow_stage_activity_groups etc.? Let me verify what down actually deletes. From the initial diff of down(): Actually let me re-read lines 420-620 of migration to know precisely what's removed versus left. Good idea because the plan item #7 says "down() não remove records filho" but based on the diff excerpt provided at the beginning, down() DID include a large set of cleanup code? Let me re-read from the code we have in diff... Wait the conversation started with review plan and tool calls, but the initial diff of the migration was not shown in messages (only referenced in plan). Actually the user's very first message "review plan" mentions issue 7: "down() não remove records filho" and says the diff shows some cleanup. I haven't actually read down() code. Let's read lines 400-500 of the migration file to see the down().
Let me do that plus maybe read lines 380-520. Also maybe read lines 520-680 (up methods). And maybe read OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService find methods to anchor finding lines precisely (but we know enough).
Also the summary must be in Portuguese. Let's consolidate current state.
Structured output dimensions:
- Identified Code Issues
- Tool Call Conclusions
- Completed Tasks
- Pending Tasks
- Current Focus
The conversation is still mid-review; many planned issues remain unresolved (e.g., check the migration content further, unconfirmed items #2/#5/#6/#7/#8, plus tests). We need to summarize all so far and include pending verifications and what's completed.
As the review assistant, we need to continue, not restart.
Let me collect the up-to-date results:
Completed determinations:
1. #2 (type change) — verified as non-bug/correction: entity columns are decimal (Doctrine returns string); getter/setter ?string matches DBAL; all S2299 callers in non-strict repo/ESocialDataService/FlowableVariablesService are compatible; manual save path in CompanyMemberController (strict_types=1) decodes JSON but the repository call site file has no strict_types, so coercion—no TypeError; old code would lose decimals. Initial suspicion resolved as not an issue.
2. #5 origins of system_sender — 3 occurrences all internal (new action at 15087, forward in executeNotify 7050, resolved in executeSendEmail 13918); no front-end / UI path found setting it. Potential elevation only if user-edited action config can carry the key, unverified → should not be reported as confirmed. (Dropped.)
3. #8 docs file — exists: docs/database-changes/2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template.md. (Dropped.)
4. God object (AutomationExecutionService 15387 lines; method list > 400 private functions; new method adds ~240 lines of orchestration) — confirmed and should be reported high.
5. Triggers 'on_all_activities_complete' and 'on_offboarding_complete' valid; 'on_enter' valid and matching YAML trigger id 'employee_enters_stage' — seed config internally consistent.
Tentative findings:
- DraftService date-equality pending draft reuse: pending draft with old/other date won't be found → duplicate pendente S-2299 created; comment claims dedupe. Real — confirm with code lines in OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService around 215-260. (medium)
- Status != 'pendente' semantics with error statuses: 'erro no processamento' seen across EsocialEvents status code; no S-2299-specific set to differentiate; non-pendente events block creation. Should be medium/design gap.
- Migration down/up orphan/duplication concern (needs confirmation by reading down()).
- pending #1/#4/#6.
- We also have to still examine remaining file changes unless we've seen everything the plan requested. But given that we need to produce summary, we should capture the unresolved checks as pending for future continuation.
Let me do final quick reads:
- Migration lines 400-560 (down/up) to confirm child cleanup.
- OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService lines 140-260 (find methods) to anchor findings.
Let's proceed with these two tool calls.
Vou confirmar os detalhes finais do método down() da migration e dos métodos de busca de eventos pendentes no serviço de rascunho S-2299 para ancorar os achados.
Request #2
deepseek-v4-flash
P:91.29K C:540 CR:384 CW:0
6571ms
Reasoning
The search is broad. Interesting: `FlowableVariablesService` calls `$this->formatter->formatDouble('percAliment', $eventData['percAliment'] ?? 0.0, 'global')`. If `$eventData['percAliment']` is a string "12.50" (from entity getter), formatDouble might accept float|string? Possibly it expects float. If it expects float and receives string "12.50", PHP non-strict coerces to float. Fine. Docs mention percAliment double and examples 30.00. So overall type change string aligning with decimal is likely consistent.
Now here's a new consideration: **FlowableVariablesService line 15208/15284 calls formatDouble on the eventData's percAliment. But now the getter returns `?string` instead of `?int`; if the underlying value is stored decimal "12.50", the string "12.50" will be cast to double 12.5 by non-strict? If strict_types is declared in FlowableVariablesService, passing string to float param type would TypeError. Let's check the file's strict_types or formatDouble signature.** Search for declare strict in FlowableVariablesService. This would be a real regression if strict. Let's check formatDouble signature.
<message id="69" role="tool">
<content>
File: src/Service/FlowableServices/FlowableVariablesService.php (Total lines: 20058)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 15195-15220
15195| public function getEsocialS2299Variables(int $eventId): ?array
15196| {
15197| $repository = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class);
15198| $eventData = $repository->getFlowableDataForTemplate($eventId);
15199|
15200| if (!$eventData) {
15201| return null;
15202| }
15203|
15204| return [
15205| 'percAliment' => $this->formatter->formatDouble('percAliment', $eventData['percAliment'] ?? 0.0, 'global'),
15206| 'vrAlim' => $this->formatter->formatDouble('vrAlim', $eventData['vrAlim'] ?? 0.0, 'global'),
15207| ...
]
</content>
</message>
review_filter_task
Request #1
deepseek-v4-flash
P:28.3K C:2.29K CR:1.92K CW:0
16433ms
Reasoning
Let me analyze each comment against the diffs.
The task: remove only comments that the diff proves factually wrong. Ground A: comment targets code not in its subject file's diff. Ground B: a specific diff line literally contradicts the comment's central claim.
Let me examine each comment:
**c-0**: Path: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php. Content: rollback disables template and erases seed_migration from settings, but doesn't remove stages, activities, automations, links created for it. If migration is reverted and reapplied (down + up), up() doesn't find the old template by seed_migration key and inserts a second template with same stages/automations, accumulating orphan lines. This is a comment about migration idempotency/behavior. Is this a protected subject? It's about behavioral/compatibility... hmm. Actually it's about a data migration's correctness. Not obviously a protected subject — it's not memory safety, concurrency, linkage, or behavioral change in old code. It is about a migration bug — down/up behavior. Hmm, could be considered "behavioral change"? The protected subject is "Behavioral or compatibility change — a message, field, status, or default that the old code produced and the new code no longer does". This comment is about migration idempotency and data accumulation. Not really that category.
Let me check the diff. The down() method sets is_active = 0 and settings without seed_migration, sets seed_migration_rolled_back. The up() finds templates by workflow_id AND seed_migration in settings. After a down, seed_migration is unset and is_active=0, so up() would create a second template. The comment's factual claims: down() disables template and erases seed_migration (true, from diff: `unset($settings['seed_migration']); $settings['seed_migration_rolled_back'] = self::SEED_KEY;` and UPDATE with is_active = 0). It doesn't remove stages/activities/automations/template_products (true from diff — down() only deletes workflow_products conditionally and updates flow_templates). up() doesn't find the old template by seed key (after down the seed key was removed), inserts a second template. This is a chain of reasoning but the diff supports it. Can I verify the central claim is contradicted by the diff? No. The diff is consistent with the comment. So c-0 should be approved (not factually wrong per the diff).
Actually, wait — is this a behavioral/compatibility protected subject? It concerns re-running migrations. Not exactly. But regardless, the comment seems plausible from the diff; nothing contradicts it. Approve.
**c-1**: Path: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php. This is a code organization/architecture comment — the new command adds ~250 lines of orchestration to a huge file, mixing responsibility resolution, event decision, persistence, audit, notification. The extraction service only got entity assembly. Recommends moving orchestration into the service. This is style/architecture opinion. Is what it states true of the diff? The diff indeed shows executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft as a large method (~250 lines) in AutomationExecutionService, and the OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService containing the entity-building logic. So its factual statements are true. It's an architectural opinion — not a Ground A/B removal. Value veto applies (style/readability/organization), and what it states is true. Approve.
**c-2**: Path: src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php. Content: A pending draft for the same collaborator is only reused when the date recorded equals current offboarding date or is empty. If dismissal date changed after manual draft created, findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal doesn't find it and flow creates a second pending S-2299 — duplicity. Claims tests don't cover (all use same date).
Let me check the diff. In findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal:
```php
if ($dismissalDate instanceof \DateTimeInterface) {
$queryBuilder
->andWhere('event.dtDeslig = :dismissalDate OR event.dtDeslig IS NULL')
->setParameter('dismissalDate', $dismissalDate->format('Y-m-d'));
}
```
Yes, it matches only equal date or NULL. So if a pending draft exists with a different (old) date, this query wouldn't find it, and the code would create a new event. The comment's claim seems consistent with the diff. Is there a diff line that contradicts? No. Approve.
Wait — but consider test `testCreateEsocialDraftOverwritesDismissalDateOnUpdateEvenWhenAlreadyFilled`: it uses existingEvent found via metadata (eventId), not findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal. And the reuses pending draft test uses same date. The comment says tests don't cover the changed-date scenario — the tests use the same date. That's accurate.
Also, note that eventMatchesContext ignores dismissalDate (deliberately, per its docblock). But findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal filters by date. That's the comment's claim. Approve.
**c-3**: Path: src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php. Content: Any event not 'pendente' status is treated as official and not editable, including failure/rejection states where S-2299 was never accepted by eSocial (the rest of the system uses e.g. 'erro no processamento', 'enviado', 'processado'). When previous send failed, final offboarding stage just warns "official event exists" and blocks. Restrict lock to definitive states.
Check diff: `findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal` has `->andWhere('event.status != :pendingStatus')`. Yes — treats any non-pending event as existing/official/not editable. So the central claim (any event not 'pendente' is treated as not editable/official) matches. The claim about the rest of the system using other statuses can't be verified from the diff, but the Agent had access. The diff itself doesn't contradict.
Also `if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $event->getStatus() !== 'pendente') { $eventStatus = 'existing_not_editable'; }` in AutomationExecutionService — consistent.
So c-3's central factual claim is supported by the diff. Approve.
Hmm. So all comments appear to be factually consistent with the diffs. Let me reconsider whether any comment is wrong.
Wait, I should double-check c-0 more carefully. The comment says the down() doesn't remove the child records and up() would insert a second template. Is there anything in up() that would reconcile? up() checks for template with seed_migration in settings; after down, the seed was removed, so it won't find. Right. But wait — is there any question whether the comment is factually wrong because down() sets is_active=0 and up() doesn't query is_active? up() finds templates by seed key regardless of is_active. After down, seed key is removed. So new template inserted. The old child records (stages etc.) still exist pointing to the old inactive template. And the new template gets new stages. So duplication of stages/automations occurs, attached to different templates. That's consistent with the comment.
Actually, one subtle thing: the claim "insere um segundo template com as mesmas etapas/automações, acumulando linhas órfãs ligadas ao template inativo". Stages are attached to template id; the new template will get its own new stages (since ensureStage matches by template+name). So yes, duplication. Comment fine.
None of these comments are disproven by a literal diff line, and none target code absent from their subject file.
For c-1, subject is AutomationExecutionService.php and the code (executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft) is in that file's diff. Fine.
So I should approve all.
Let me double check protected subjects for each, but since none are removable anyway, approve all. Actually the instruction: call report_incorrect_comments only for comments meeting Ground A or B. Otherwise approve_all_comments.
No comment meets Ground A or B. So approve_all_comments.
I'll analyze each comment against the diffs.
**c-0** (migration rollback idempotency): The diff's `down()` does `unset($settings['seed_migration'])`, sets `seed_migration_rolled_back`, sets `is_active = 0`, and only conditionally deletes `workflow_products` — it never deletes `flow_stages`, `flow_activities`, `flow_automations`, or `flow_template_products`. The `up()` locates templates by `seed_migration` in settings, which `down()` removed. Nothing in the diff contradicts the comment's central claim about orphaned children accumulating on down+up. No Ground A or B.
**c-1** (architecture/orchestration in the dispatcher): The diff does show `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` as a ~250-line orchestration method added to `AutomationExecutionService`, with the dedicated service holding only entity assembly. The stated facts are true of the diff; the rest is an organizational recommendation. Value veto applies — not removable.
**c-2** (pending-draft reuse filtered by date): The diff's `findPendingDraftForCurrentDismissal` adds `event.dtDeslig = :dismissalDate OR event.dtDeslig IS NULL` only when a date is present, so a pending draft with an outdated non-null date would not match, and the flow would create a new one. The claim matches the diff; nothing contradicts it. The tests in the group all use matching dates, consistent with the "not covered" claim. No Ground A or B.
**c-3** (any non-'pendente' status treated as official/not editable): Both `findExistingEventForCurrentDismissal` (`status != :pendingStatus`) and `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` (`getStatus() !== 'pendente'` → `existing_not_editable`) confirm the central claim. Nothing in the diff contradicts it. No Ground A or B.
None of the comments is disproven by a diff line, and each targets code present in its subject file's diff. The correct outcome is to approve all.
Tool Calls (1)
approve_all_comments
Show Details
Arguments
{}
Request #2
deepseek-v4-flash
P:27.38K C:1.1K CR:21.25K CW:0
7828ms
Reasoning
Let me analyze this comment.
The comment c-0 targets src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php. It says the new handling of empty/null aviso prévio (now writing null instead of 'N') changes behavior of saveEventS2299, but there's no test covering this path in the repository — the new test suite tests the automation flow (OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService), not the saveEventS2299 used by the manual dismissal tab. It's a boundary value with direct impact on eSocial XML; suggests adding a unit test for the repository.
The diff line shows:
```
$event->setIndPagtoApi(isset($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado']) && $data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] !== '' ? ($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N') : null);
```
This is a comment about missing tests / behavioral change. Is this a protected subject? It concerns a behavioral change: "muda o comportamento do saveEventS2299 (passar a gravar null em vez de 'N')". Behavioral or compatibility change is a protected subject. Actually, the comment itself is about test coverage, but its central claim is that the change alters behavior (null instead of 'N' when empty), which is a behavioral change. That's protected — approve.
Wait, but also the comment could be about missing tests. However, its central claim involves the behavior change of saveEventS2299. Under the protected subject "Behavioral or compatibility change — a message, field, status, or default that the old code produced and the new code no longer does; an altered error path". The old code: `$data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N'` — if empty/unset, would produce 'N' (or error if unset). New code: empty string → null. So the claim is that empty now produces null instead of 'N'. The diff confirms: previously `$data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N'` where empty string is falsy → 'N'. Now empty → null. So behavioral change is real and it's a protected subject.
Also the claim that "não há nenhum teste cobrindo esse caminho no repositório" — the tests in the group don't cover this repository saveEventS2299 path. We can't verify what tests exist elsewhere; unverifiable. But even if the factual claim about behavior is true and about missing tests... is it Ground B? Ground B requires a diff line that literally contradicts the central claim. The claim is that empty/null now becomes null instead of 'N', and no test covers this. The diff shows the change to null — actually supporting, not contradicting. So no Ground B.
Ground A — the code described is present in the subject file's diff (the repository file shows the setIndPagtoApi change). So not Ground A.
But Step 1 protected-subject veto: The comment's subject is a behavioral change (null vs 'N')... Actually let me think carefully. The comment is really a request for a test. Its subject is... hmm. The comment notes a behavioral change and the absence of test coverage. Is this a "behavioral or compatibility change" comment? The protected categories are about comments on those subjects. A comment that identifies a behavioral change and suggests a test is arguably on a protected subject.
Actually, the question is whether the comment asserts something the diff proves wrong. The comment says: "O novo tratamento de aviso prévio vazio/nulo (passar a gravar null em vez de 'N') muda o comportamento do saveEventS2299" — this is factually consistent with the diff. "mas não há nenhum teste cobrindo esse caminho no repositório — a suíte nova da PR testa o fluxo da automação... não o saveEventS2299" — is this true? The tests in the group are OffboardingAutomationConfigTest and OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest. Neither tests the repository saveEventS2299. We can't see other tests in the codebase, but the claim about "a suíte nova da PR" (the new suite in the PR) is verifiable from the diff: the new test files don't test saveEventS2299. So that claim is accurate about the new tests. Whether existing tests elsewhere cover it, we cannot verify — but the comment specifically says the new suite doesn't cover this, which is true per the diff.
So no ground for removal. Approve.
Let me double check protected veto: "Behavioral or compatibility change — a message, field, status, or default that the old code produced and the new code no longer does". The comment describes old code producing 'N' for empty and new code producing null. That's precisely a default/status change. Protected. Approve.
Even without protected veto, the comment isn't contradicted by any diff line. Approve all.
Tool Calls (1)
approve_all_comments
Show Details
Arguments
{}
templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig,templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig,templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig 15 requests
main_task
Request #1
deepseek-v4-flash
P:7.22K C:784 CR:2.69K CW:0
4802ms
Reasoning
Let me analyze the three files in the review group:
1. `templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig` - A fix changing `prevEvts.desligamento` to `prevEvts.termino` in a template check.
2. `templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig` - Adds a new label for `create_esocial_s2299_draft` action type.
3. `templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig` - Adds a new display name mapping.
Let me look at each file to understand the context.
For file 1: The change fixes a bug where accessing `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` when `prevEvts.termino` doesn't exist (previously checked `prevEvts.desligamento`). This is a bug fix that aligns with the PR's scope (correcting error when opening desligamento tab when no previous termino event).
Let me check if there are other occurrences of `prevEvts.desligamento` or `prevEvts.termino` in the same file that may have similar issues. Let me read the file.
For files 2 and 3: They just add label mappings. Let me check whether other places in these templates might need the same mapping - e.g., there might be similar mappings in other templates or sections that also need updating. Let me search.
Let me start by reading the files for context.
Let me check `prevEvts` - what is it in the template? It seems to be from a controller. Also check for other access patterns in the same template like `prevEvts.termino` without guard, `prevEvts.desligamento`, etc.
Let me read the motivo_desligamento.html.twig file around the change.
Also, I should check whether `list_automations.html.twig` and `flow_detail.html.twig` changes have the label key correctly matching what the AutomationExecutionService adds (i.e., `create_esocial_s2299_draft`). The scope confirms the action type name.
Let me search for other places that map action type to labels, in case there are other templates (like chat message templates or notification templates) that need updating for the new action, but those files are outside the review group; we can't comment on files outside review_files. But cross-file observations within review_files are encouraged.
Let me read the files to check for context and potential issues.
Vou analisar os três arquivos do grupo de revisão, começando pela leitura do contexto de cada alteração.
Tool Calls (3)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig"}
Result
File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig (Total lines: 124)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-124
1|<section id="termino-motivo-desligamento" class="dynamic-termino-section" style="display: none;">
2| <form>
3| <h5>Motivo do Desligamento</h5>
4| <p class="card-description">
5| Informe os dados relacionados ao motivo do desligamento ou término do trabalhador.
6| </p>
7| <div class="row">
8| <!-- Motivo do Desligamento -->
9|<div class="col-md-6 mb-3">
10| <label for="termino-motivoDesligamento">Motivo do Desligamento <span class="text-danger">*</span></label>
11| <select class="form-control" id="termino-motivoDesligamento" name="termino-motivoDesligamento" required>
12| <option value="" selected disabled>Selecione um motivo</option>
13| <option value="01"
14| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '01' %}
15| selected
16| {% endif %}>
17| 01 - Exoneração do diretor não empregado sem justa causa
18| </option>
19| <option value="02"
20| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '02' %}
21| selected
22| {% endif %}>
23| 02 - Término de mandato do diretor não empregado não reconduzido
24| </option>
25| <option value="03"
26| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '03' %}
27| selected
28| {% endif %}>
29| 03 - Exoneração a pedido de diretor não empregado
30| </option>
31| <option value="04"
32| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '04' %}
33| selected
34| {% endif %}>
35| 04 - Exoneração do diretor não empregado por culpa recíproca ou força maior
36| </option>
37| <option value="05"
38| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '05' %}
39| selected
40| {% endif %}>
41| 05 - Morte do diretor não empregado
42| </option>
43| <option value="06"
44| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '06' %}
45| selected
46| {% endif %}>
47| 06 - Exoneração por falência ou encerramento
48| </option>
49| <option value="07"
50| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '07' %}
51| selected
52| {% endif %}>
53| 07 - Mudança de CPF
54| </option>
55| <option value="99"
56| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '99' %}
57| selected
58| {% endif %}>
59| 99 - Outros
60| </option>
61| </select>
62| <small class="form-text text-muted">
63| Selecione o código conforme a Tabela 19 do eSocial.
64| </small>
65|</div>
66|
67|
68|
69|
70|
71| <!-- Data do Término -->
72| <div class="col-md-6 mb-3">
73| <label for="termino-dataTermino">Data do Término <span class="text-danger">*</span></label>
74| <input
75| type="date"
76| id="termino-dataTermino"
77| name="termino-dataTermino"
78| class="form-control"
79| required
80| placeholder="Selecione a data do término"
81| value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.dtTerm %}{{ prevEvts.termino.dtTerm|date('Y-m-d') }}{% endif %}">
82| <small class="form-text text-muted">
83| Último dia trabalhado. Deve ser igual ou anterior à data atual + 10 dias.
84| </small>
85| </div>
86|
87|
88|
89| <!-- Número Processo Trabalhista -->
90| <div class="col-md-6 mb-3">
91| <label for="termino-numeroProcesso">Número Processo Trabalhista</label>
92| <input
93| type="text"
94| id="termino-numeroProcesso"
95| name="termino-numeroProcesso"
96| class="form-control"
97| maxlength="20"
98| placeholder="Informe o número do processo trabalhista"
99| value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab %}{{ prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab }}{% endif %}">
100| <small class="form-text text-muted">
101| Número que identifica o processo trabalhista (opcional).
102| </small>
103| </div>
104|</div>
105|
106| <div id="buttons-container" class="mt-4"></div>
107| </form>
108|</section>
109|
110|<script>
111| document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", () => {
112| const dateField = document.getElementById("termino-dataTermino");
113|
114| if (dateField) {
115| const today = new Date();
116| const maxDate = new Date(today);
117| maxDate.setDate(today.getDate() + 10);
118|
119| const formattedMaxDate = maxDate.toISOString().split("T")[0]; // Formata para AAAA-MM-DD
120| dateField.setAttribute("max", formattedMaxDate); // Define o atributo max dinamicamente
121| }
122| });
123|</script>
124|
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig", "start_line": 480, "end_line": 580}
Result
File: templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig (Total lines: 823)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 480-580
480| 'crm_move_to_funnel': 'Mover registro para o funil',
481| 'crm_move_to_stage': 'Mover registro para etapa específica',
482| 'crm_update_priority': 'Atualizar tag de prioridade',
483| 'crm_add_custom_tag': 'Adicionar tag personalizada',
484| 'crm_notify_record_owner': 'Notificar responsável do registro',
485| 'crm_notify_board_owner': 'Notificar responsável do quadro',
486| // NPS + ponte CRM+NPS
487| 'nps_action_move_linked_nps_to_convite': 'Mover NPS vinculado para a etapa Convite',
488| 'nps_action_notify_owner': 'Notificar responsável do registro',
489| 'nps_action_notify_admin': 'Notificar administrador do tenant',
490| 'nps_action_send_request_notification': 'Enviar solicitação',
491| 'nps_action_move_to_evaluation': 'Mover para Avaliação',
492| 'nps_action_move_to_not_authorized': 'Mover para Não Autorizado',
493| 'nps_action_send_invite': 'Enviar convite da pesquisa NPS',
494| 'nps_action_evaluation_contact_followup': 'Follow-up Avaliação: contato / nova oportunidade (e-mail)',
495| // ── Treinamentos ──────────────────────────────────────
496| 'notify_participant': 'Notificar participante',
497| 'notify_training_responsible': 'Notificar responsável do grupo',
498| 'send_request_notification': 'Enviar solicitação',
499| // SSMA
500| 'ssma_notify': 'Enviar notificação',
501| 'ssma_action_notify': 'Enviar notificação',
502| 'ssma_notify_responsible': 'Notificar responsáveis da ocorrência',
503| 'ssma_action_notify_responsible': 'Notificar responsáveis da ocorrência',
504| 'ssma_notify_gestor': 'Notificar gestor de segurança',
505| 'ssma_action_notify_gestor': 'Notificar gestor de segurança',
506| 'ssma_notify_member': 'Notificar um membro',
507| 'ssma_action_notify_member': 'Notificar um membro',
508| 'ssma_notify_person': 'Notificar uma pessoa por e-mail',
509| 'ssma_action_notify_person': 'Notificar uma pessoa por e-mail',
510| 'ssma_archive_occurrence': 'Arquivar ocorrência após X dias',
511| 'ssma_action_archive_occurrence': 'Arquivar ocorrência após X dias',
512| 'ssma_escalate_occurrence': 'Escalar ocorrência para nível superior',
513| 'ssma_action_escalate_occurrence': 'Escalar ocorrência para nível superior',
514| // ── PDI ────────────────────────────────────────────────
515| 'send_email_member': 'Enviar e-mail ao colaborador',
516| 'send_email_direct_manager': 'Enviar e-mail ao gestor direto',
517| 'send_email_goal_responsible': 'Enviar e-mail ao responsável pela meta',
518| 'send_email_company_member': 'Enviar e-mail para membro específico',
519| 'send_email_role': 'Enviar e-mail por cargo',
520| 'send_alert_member': 'Enviar alerta ao colaborador',
521| 'send_alert_direct_manager': 'Enviar alerta ao gestor direto',
522| 'send_alert_goal_responsible': 'Enviar alerta ao responsável pela meta',
523| 'assign_goal_responsible': 'Atribuir responsável à meta',
524| 'assign_responsible': 'Atribuir responsável à meta',
525| 'move_to_previous_stage': 'Voltar para etapa anterior',
526| 'stage_change_previous': 'Voltar para etapa anterior',
527| 'direct_movement': 'Movimentar sem solicitação',
528| 'send_request_notification': 'Enviar solicitação',
529| 'send_bpm_notification': 'Enviar notificação',
530| 'bpm_notification': 'Enviar notificação',
531| 'request_notification': 'Enviar solicitação',
532| 'create_esocial_s2299_draft': 'Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299)',
533| 'financial_flow_action': 'Executar ação financeira',
534| // ── Fluxos financeiros (por id) ─────────────────────
535| 'financial_refund_notify_flow_responsible': 'Notificar responsável do fluxo',
536| 'financial_refund_request_approval': 'Solicitar aprovação',
537| 'financial_refund_move_to_next_stage': 'Mover para próxima etapa',
538| 'financial_refund_move_to_stage': 'Mover para etapa específica',
539| 'financial_refund_approve': 'Aprovar reembolso',
540| 'financial_refund_reject': 'Reprovar reembolso',
541| 'financial_refund_mark_paid': 'Marcar como pago',
542| 'financial_refund_notify_requester': 'Notificar solicitante',
543| 'financial_refund_notify_approver': 'Notificar aprovador',
544| 'financial_refund_open_communication': 'Enviar solicitação para Central de Comunicação',
545| 'financial_payable_notify_flow_responsible': 'Notificar responsável do fluxo',
546| 'financial_payable_request_approval': 'Solicitar aprovação',
547| 'financial_payable_move_to_next_stage': 'Mover para próxima etapa',
548| 'financial_payable_move_to_stage': 'Mover para etapa específica',
549| 'financial_payable_approve': 'Aprovar lançamento',
550| 'financial_payable_reject': 'Reprovar lançamento',
551| 'financial_payable_mark_paid': 'Marcar como pago',
552| 'financial_payable_generate_cnab': 'Gerar remessa CNAB',
553| 'financial_payable_notify_owner': 'Notificar responsável do lançamento',
554| 'financial_payable_open_communication': 'Enviar solicitação para Central de Comunicação',
555| 'financial_receivable_notify_flow_responsible': 'Notificar responsável do fluxo',
556| 'financial_receivable_request_approval': 'Solicitar aprovação',
557| 'financial_receivable_request_approval_action': 'Solicitar aprovação do recebível',
558| 'financial_receivable_move_to_next_stage': 'Mover para próxima etapa',
559| 'financial_receivable_move_to_stage': 'Mover para etapa específica',
560| 'financial_receivable_release_collection': 'Liberar para cobrança',
561| 'financial_receivable_reject': 'Reprovar recebível',
562| 'financial_receivable_mark_received': 'Marcar como recebido',
563| 'financial_receivable_require_reason': 'Informar motivo da reprovação',
564| 'financial_receivable_notify_owner': 'Notificar responsável do recebível',
565| 'financial_receivable_open_communication': 'Enviar solicitação para Central de Comunicação',
566| 'financial_bank_notify_flow_responsible': 'Notificar responsável do fluxo',
567| 'financial_bank_move_to_next_stage': 'Mover para próxima etapa',
568| 'financial_bank_move_to_stage': 'Mover para etapa específica',
569| 'financial_bank_process_return': 'Processar retorno',
570| 'financial_bank_generate_remittance': 'Gerar nova remessa',
571| 'financial_bank_cancel_remittance': 'Cancelar remessa',
572| 'financial_bank_notify_owner': 'Notificar responsável'
573| };
574| const financialActionKeyLabels = {
575| 'approve_refund': 'Aprovar reembolso',
576| 'reject_refund': 'Reprovar reembolso',
577| 'mark_refund_paid': 'Marcar reembolso como pago',
578| 'approve_payable': 'Aprovar lançamento',
579| 'reject_payable': 'Reprovar lançamento',
580| 'mark_payable_paid': 'Marcar lançamento como pago',
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig", "start_line": 4020, "end_line": 4120}
Result
File: templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig (Total lines: 5530) IS_TRUNCATED: false LINE_RANGE: 4020-4120 4020| 'update_status': 'atualizar status', 4021| 'create_task': 'criar tarefa', 4022| 'schedule_interview': 'agendar entrevista', 4023| 'add_tag': 'adicionar tag', 4024| 'send_webhook': 'enviar webhook', 4025| 'assign_user': 'atribuir usuário', 4026| 'create_processo_seletivo': 'criar processo seletivo', 4027| // ── CRM (por type) ──────────────────────────────────────── 4028| 'crm_action_next_funnel': 'mover para o próximo funil', 4029| 'crm_action_next_stage': 'mover para a próxima etapa', 4030| 'crm_action_move_funnel': 'mover registro para o funil', 4031| 'crm_action_move_stage': 'mover registro para etapa específica', 4032| 'crm_action_priority': 'atualizar tag de prioridade', 4033| 'crm_action_custom_tag': 'adicionar tag personalizada', 4034| 'crm_action_notify_owner': 'notificar responsável do registro', 4035| 'crm_action_notify_board': 'notificar responsável do quadro', 4036| 'crm_action_conversion_probability': 'atualizar probabilidade de conversão', 4037| 'crm_action_convert_to_contact': 'converter registro para contato', 4038| 'crm_action_send_request_notification': 'enviar solicitação', 4039| // ── CRM (por id — retrocompatibilidade) ─────────────────── 4040| 'crm_move_to_next_funnel': 'mover para o próximo funil', 4041| 'crm_move_to_next_stage': 'mover para a próxima etapa', 4042| 'crm_move_to_funnel': 'mover registro para o funil', 4043| 'crm_move_to_stage': 'mover registro para etapa específica', 4044| 'crm_update_priority': 'atualizar tag de prioridade', 4045| 'crm_add_custom_tag': 'adicionar tag personalizada', 4046| 'crm_notify_record_owner': 'notificar responsável do registro', 4047| 'crm_notify_board_owner': 'notificar responsável do quadro', 4048| 'crm_update_conversion_probability': 'atualizar probabilidade de conversão', 4049| 'crm_convert_to_contact': 'converter registro para contato', 4050| 'crm_send_request_notification': 'enviar solicitação', 4051| // NPS (com IA) + ponte CRM+NPS 4052| 'nps_action_move_linked_nps_to_convite': 'mover NPS vinculado para a etapa Convite', 4053| 'nps_action_notify_owner': 'notificar responsável do registro', 4054| 'nps_action_notify_admin': 'notificar administrador do tenant', 4055| 'nps_action_send_request_notification': 'enviar solicitação', 4056| 'nps_action_move_to_evaluation': 'mover para Avaliação', 4057| 'nps_action_move_to_not_authorized': 'mover para Não Autorizado', 4058| 'nps_action_send_invite': 'enviar convite da pesquisa NPS', 4059| 'nps_action_evaluation_contact_followup': 'follow-up Avaliação: contato / nova oportunidade (e-mail)', 4060| // ── Treinamentos ────────────────────────────────────────────── 4061| 'notify_participant': 'notificar participante', 4062| 'notify_training_responsible': 'notificar responsável do grupo', 4063| 'send_request_notification': 'enviar solicitação', 4064| // ── PDI ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────── 4065| 'send_email_member': 'enviar e-mail ao colaborador', 4066| 'send_email_direct_manager': 'enviar e-mail ao gestor direto', 4067| 'send_email_goal_responsible': 'enviar e-mail ao responsável pela meta', 4068| 'send_email_company_member': 'enviar e-mail para membro específico', 4069| 'send_email_role': 'enviar e-mail por cargo', 4070| 'send_alert_member': 'enviar alerta ao colaborador', 4071| 'send_alert_direct_manager': 'enviar alerta ao gestor direto', 4072| 'send_alert_goal_responsible': 'enviar alerta ao responsável pela meta', 4073| 'assign_goal_responsible': 'atribuir responsável à meta', 4074| 'assign_responsible': 'atribuir responsável à meta', 4075| 'direct_movement': 'movimentar sem solicitação', 4076| 'move_to_previous_stage': 'voltar para etapa anterior', 4077| 'stage_change_previous': 'voltar para etapa anterior', 4078| 'create_esocial_s2299_draft': 'criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299)', 4079| 'financial_flow_action': 'executar ação financeira', 4080| // ── Fluxos financeiros (por id) ─────────────────────────── 4081| 'financial_refund_notify_flow_responsible': 'notificar responsável do fluxo', 4082| 'financial_refund_request_approval': 'solicitar aprovação', 4083| 'financial_refund_move_to_next_stage': 'mover para próxima etapa', 4084| 'financial_refund_move_to_stage': 'mover para etapa específica', 4085| 'financial_refund_approve': 'aprovar reembolso', 4086| 'financial_refund_reject': 'reprovar reembolso', 4087| 'financial_refund_mark_paid': 'marcar reembolso como pago', 4088| 'financial_refund_notify_requester': 'notificar solicitante', 4089| 'financial_refund_notify_approver': 'notificar aprovador', 4090| 'financial_refund_open_communication': 'enviar solicitação para Central de Comunicação', 4091| 'financial_payable_notify_flow_responsible': 'notificar responsável do fluxo', 4092| 'financial_payable_request_approval': 'solicitar aprovação', 4093| 'financial_payable_move_to_next_stage': 'mover para próxima etapa', 4094| 'financial_payable_move_to_stage': 'mover para etapa específica', 4095| 'financial_payable_approve': 'aprovar lançamento', 4096| 'financial_payable_reject': 'reprovar lançamento', 4097| 'financial_payable_mark_paid': 'marcar lançamento como pago', 4098| 'financial_payable_generate_cnab': 'gerar remessa CNAB', 4099| 'financial_payable_notify_owner': 'notificar responsável do lançamento', 4100| 'financial_payable_open_communication': 'enviar solicitação para Central de Comunicação', 4101| 'financial_receivable_notify_flow_responsible': 'notificar responsável do fluxo', 4102| 'financial_receivable_request_approval': 'solicitar aprovação', 4103| 'financial_receivable_request_approval_action': 'solicitar aprovação do recebível', 4104| 'financial_receivable_move_to_next_stage': 'mover para próxima etapa', 4105| 'financial_receivable_move_to_stage': 'mover para etapa específica', 4106| 'financial_receivable_release_collection': 'liberar recebível para cobrança', 4107| 'financial_receivable_reject': 'reprovar recebível', 4108| 'financial_receivable_mark_received': 'marcar recebível como recebido', 4109| 'financial_receivable_require_reason': 'informar motivo da reprovação', 4110| 'financial_receivable_notify_owner': 'notificar responsável do recebível', 4111| 'financial_receivable_open_communication': 'enviar solicitação para Central de Comunicação', 4112| 'financial_bank_notify_flow_responsible': 'notificar responsável do fluxo', 4113| 'financial_bank_move_to_next_stage': 'mover para próxima etapa', 4114| 'financial_bank_move_to_stage': 'mover para etapa específica', 4115| 'financial_bank_process_return': 'processar retorno bancário', 4116| 'financial_bank_generate_remittance': 'gerar nova remessa', 4117| 'financial_bank_cancel_remittance': 'cancelar remessa', 4118| 'financial_bank_notify_owner': 'notificar responsável' 4119| }; 4120|
Request #2
deepseek-v4-flash
P:13.86K C:1.41K CR:7.94K CW:0
9269ms
Reasoning
Let me analyze the changes:
### File 1: `motivo_desligamento.html.twig`
The change:
```twig
- value="{% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab %}{{ prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab }}{% endif %}">
+ value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab %}{{ prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab }}{% endif %}">
```
This fixes a bug where if `prevEvts.termino` is null, `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` would throw. The fix makes sense. This matches the PR scope (correcting the error when opening the termination tab when there is no previous termino event).
Note that the rest of the file uses `prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.xxx` pattern consistently (lines 14, 20, 26, 32, 38, 44, 50, 56, 81, 99). So this change makes line 99 consistent with the rest. Good fix.
But wait - there's still a potential problem. What is `prevEvts`? Is there a scenario where `prevEvts` itself is null? Look at line 14: `{% if prevEvts.termino and ... %}`. If `prevEvts` is null, then `prevEvts.termino` would also throw in Twig... Actually in Twig, accessing an attribute of null returns null by default (Twig 3 throws? no, Twig by default ignores null in `attribute` access unless strict variables is enabled). In Twig, if strict_variables is false, `null.termino` evaluates to null without error. So `prevEvts.termino` where prevEvts is null yields null, no exception. The issue arises from `prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab`: if desligamento is truthy and termino null, then accessing `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` on null → null (no error) in non-strict mode. Hmm, in Twig `null.nrProcTrab` returns null silently. So actually even the old code wouldn't throw in non-strict Twig. But wait, the bug being fixed says "Corrigido erro ao abrir a aba de desligamento quando prevEvts.termino ainda não existe." Hmm, the bug would only manifest if strict_variables is true, or... Actually maybe accessing attributes of null when null — Twig with strict_variables false returns null and logs warning? Let me not dig too deep. The fix is consistent.
Actually there's a subtle issue: In the old code, when `prevEvts.desligamento` is truthy but `prevEvts.termino` is null, `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` in Twig accesses attribute on null — in non-strict mode returns null, no error. But maybe their Twig config has strict_variables enabled for this environment? Or the `prevEvts` object might have a `__get` that throws. Regardless the change is correct and consistent.
No further issues in this file's change.
### File 2 & 3: Label mappings
The changes add `create_esocial_s2299_draft` labels to JS maps. Let me verify the context of how these maps are used and whether they are used for display when action type = `create_esocial_s2299_draft`.
Wait — I should double-check: does the automation use "action type" key named `create_esocial_s2299_draft`? The other files changed show `AutomationExecutionService` new action with that name. Yes.
Let me look at how `getActionLabel` and `computeAutomationDisplayName` are used, to verify the label function name references. Also to check if there's a place where action config is a "subtype" vs full key. Let me search for `create_esocial_s2299_draft` across the codebase to ensure all label spots are covered (e.g., other places that map action types to labels might exist in other templates too, but only files in review group matter). However, cross-file consistency: if a label map in another file (outside review group) is missing the key, that's outside scope. Within review group, both templates get the mapping — good.
Let me check the `flow_detail.html.twig` context more: is there a fallback for missing labels that shows the raw type key? If there's a good default fallback (e.g., showing the raw key), then absence is cosmetic. Both templates added it.
Let me verify there aren't similar JS maps in these same two files that ALSO need updating for the new action type — e.g., a map that maps automation type to icon/color, or something that decides if automation is a "real" action vs a stage type. Let me search within these two files for usage that enumerates known actions. For instance, maybe there is a list like `Object.keys(...)` used to filter, or a map for icons.
Let me search both files for occurrences around the diff to see whether there are other maps (like icon mapping `actionIcons`) that might need the new key for correct rendering. Also check flow_detail.html.twig for how automation display names are computed - maybe there's also an icon map nearby.
Let me search the two files for `actionIcon`, `getActionLabel`, `computeAutomationDisplayName`, etc.
Vou verificar o contexto de uso desses mapas de rótulos nos dois templates para confirmar se não há outras listas/mapas (ícones, cores, etc.) que precisariam da mesma entrada para o novo tipo de ação.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "create_esocial_s2299_draft"}
Result
File: config/automations/offboarding.yaml
Match lines: 2
182| - id: "create_esocial_s2299_draft"
183| type: "create_esocial_s2299_draft"
File: docs/database-changes/2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template.md
Match lines: 4
19|- Inclui a automacao `create_esocial_s2299_draft` na etapa final.
32|1. Publicar o codigo com a action `create_esocial_s2299_draft` disponivel em `config/automations/offboarding.yaml`.
80| AND fa.action_type = 'create_esocial_s2299_draft';
96|- O fluxo depende da action `create_esocial_s2299_draft` estar disponivel no codigo antes da migration ser usada operacionalmente.
File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
Match lines: 2
331| 'actionType' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
338| 'type' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 1
512| 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' => $this->executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft($config, $member, $context),
File: templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig
Match lines: 1
532| 'create_esocial_s2299_draft': 'Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299)',
File: templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig
Match lines: 1
4078| 'create_esocial_s2299_draft': 'criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299)',
File: tests/Config/OffboardingAutomationConfigTest.php
Match lines: 3
19| if (($candidate['id'] ?? null) === 'create_esocial_s2299_draft') {
25| self::assertIsArray($action, 'Offboarding deve declarar a action create_esocial_s2299_draft.');
26| self::assertSame('create_esocial_s2299_draft', $action['type'] ?? null);
File: tests/Service/DecisionSystem/OffboardingEsocialS2299AutomationExecutionServiceTest.php
Match lines: 8
50| 'type' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
68| 'type' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
103| 'type' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
158| 'type' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
259| 'type' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
316| 'type' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
387| 'type' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
441| 'type' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "actionIcons|iconByType|automationTypeColors|getActionLabel", "file_patterns": ["templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig"], "use_perl_regexp": true}
Result
No matches found
Request #3
deepseek-v4-flash
P:15.99K C:301 CR:15.23K CW:0
2598ms
Reasoning
No icon maps found in flow_detail. Let me look at how `computeAutomationDisplayName` and `getActionLabel` are invoked and what fallback they use if a key is missing. Also, in `list_automations.html.twig`, there may be a separate area where action type is matched against known types to decide something (like whether it's a "notification" or has an "icon"). Let me read the surrounding functions to understand usage.
Vou verificar como as funções que contêm esses mapas são usadas (fallback quando a chave não existe) e se há outros pontos nesses arquivos que precisariam conhecer o novo tipo de ação.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 450, "file_path": "templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig", "start_line": 380}
Result
File: templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig (Total lines: 823)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 380-450
380| 'financial_received_confirmed': 'Recebimento for confirmado',
381| 'financial_cnab_generated': 'Remessa CNAB for gerada',
382| 'financial_bank_return_processed': 'Retorno bancário for processado com sucesso',
383| 'financial_bank_return_divergence': 'Retorno bancário tiver divergências',
384| 'financial_bank_return_error': 'Remessa retornar erro de processamento',
385| 'due_in_days': 'Vencimento estiver a X dias',
386| 'overdue': 'Vencimento estiver vencido',
387| 'amount_gt': 'Valor for maior que X',
388| 'amount_lte': 'Valor for menor ou igual a X',
389| 'requester': 'Reembolso for solicitado por...',
390| 'reimbursement_category': 'Categoria do reembolso for...',
391| 'cost_center': 'Centro de custo for...',
392| 'entry_origin': 'Origem do lançamento for...',
393| 'supplier': 'Fornecedor for...',
394| 'payment_method': 'Forma de pagamento for...',
395| 'bank_account': 'Conta bancária for...',
396| 'payer_customer': 'Cliente/pagador for...',
397| 'billing_method': 'Forma de cobrança for...',
398| 'pending_import_days': 'Retorno permanecer sem importação por X dias',
399| // ── Fluxos financeiros (por id) ─────────────────────
400| 'financial_refund_entered_stage': 'Reembolso entrar nesta etapa',
401| 'financial_refund_days_in_stage': 'Reembolso estiver há X tempo nesta etapa',
402| 'financial_payable_entered_stage': 'Lançamento entrar nesta etapa',
403| 'financial_payable_days_in_stage': 'Lançamento estiver há X tempo nesta etapa',
404| 'financial_receivable_entered_stage': 'Recebível entrar nesta etapa',
405| 'financial_receivable_days_in_stage': 'Recebível estiver há X tempo nesta etapa',
406| 'financial_bank_entered_stage': 'Retorno bancário entrar nesta etapa',
407| 'financial_bank_days_in_stage': 'Retorno bancário estiver há X tempo nesta etapa',
408| 'financial_receivable_created': 'Recebível for criado',
409| 'financial_receivable_approved': 'Recebível for aprovado',
410| 'financial_receivable_rejected': 'Recebível for reprovado',
411| 'financial_receivable_received_confirmed': 'Recebimento for confirmado',
412| 'financial_receivable_due_in_days': 'Vencimento estiver a X dias',
413| 'financial_receivable_overdue': 'Vencimento estiver vencido',
414| 'financial_payable_due_in_days': 'Vencimento estiver a X dias',
415| 'financial_payable_overdue': 'Vencimento estiver vencido',
416| 'financial_payable_amount_gt': 'Valor do lançamento for maior que X',
417| 'financial_payable_amount_lte': 'Valor do lançamento for menor ou igual a X',
418| 'financial_refund_amount_gt': 'Valor do reembolso for maior que X',
419| 'financial_refund_amount_lte': 'Valor do reembolso for menor ou igual a X',
420| 'financial_receivable_amount_gt': 'Valor do recebível for maior que X',
421| 'financial_bank_pending_import_days': 'Retorno permanecer sem importação por X dias',
422| 'financial_bank_account': 'Conta bancária for...'
423| };
424|
425| let label = labels[type] || formatTypeName(type);
426|
427| if (config && config.label) {
428| label += ' (' + config.label + ')';
429| }
430|
431| return label;
432|}
433|
434|/**
435| * Retorna label legível para tipo de ação. Para move_to_stage, config.label é a etapa de DESTINO.
436| */
437|function getActionLabel(type, config = {}) {
438| const labels = {
439| // ── Processo Seletivo / Geral ──────────────────────────────
440| 'notify': 'Enviar notificação',
441| 'notification': 'Enviar notificação',
442| 'send_email': 'Enviar e-mail',
443| 'email': 'Enviar e-mail',
444| 'send_whatsapp': 'Enviar WhatsApp',
445| 'whatsapp': 'Enviar WhatsApp',
446| 'move_to_stage': 'Mover para etapa',
447| 'stage_change': 'Mover para próxima etapa',
448| 'move_to_next_stage': 'Mover para próxima etapa',
449| 'update_status': 'Atualizar status',
450| 'create_task': 'Criar tarefa',
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig"], "search_text": "computeAutomationDisplayName"}
Result
File: templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig
Match lines: 2
3796|function computeAutomationDisplayName(automation) {
4631| <span>${computeAutomationDisplayName(automation)}</span>
Request #4
deepseek-v4-flash
P:17.6K C:161 CR:16.26K CW:0
2014ms
Reasoning
Let me read `computeAutomationDisplayName` function in flow_detail.html.twig around 3796, and the fallback.
Vou ler a função `computeAutomationDisplayName` no `flow_detail.html.twig` para ver o fallback e entender se a adição da chave é suficiente para exibição correta.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 3870, "file_path": "templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig", "start_line": 3790}
Result
File: templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig (Total lines: 5530)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 3790-3870
3790|
3791|/**
3792| * Generates a human-readable display name for an automation
3793| * based on its conditions and actions arrays.
3794| * Falls back to the raw name field when data is not available.
3795| */
3796|function computeAutomationDisplayName(automation) {
3797| function isTechnicalAutomationName(name) {
3798| if (!name) {
3799| return true;
3800| }
3801| return /\bfinancial[\s_](refund|payable|receivable|bank|flow)\b/i.test(name)
3802| || /^Quando financial /i.test(name);
3803| }
3804|
3805| var storedName = (automation.name || automation.displayName || '').trim();
3806| if (storedName && !isTechnicalAutomationName(storedName)) {
3807| return storedName;
3808| }
3809|
3810| var conditions = Array.isArray(automation.conditions) ? automation.conditions.slice() : [];
3811| var actions = Array.isArray(automation.actions) ? automation.actions.slice() : [];
3812|
3813| // Compatibilidade com formato legado (triggerType/actionType + actionConfig)
3814| if (!conditions.length && automation.triggerType) {
3815| conditions.push({
3816| type: automation.triggerType,
3817| config: automation.triggerConfig || {}
3818| });
3819| }
3820| if (!actions.length && automation.actionType) {
3821| actions.push({
3822| type: automation.actionType,
3823| config: automation.actionConfig || {}
3824| });
3825| }
3826|
3827| if (!conditions.length && !actions.length) {
3828| return automation.name || 'Automação';
3829| }
3830|
3831| var conditionNames = {
3832| // ── Processo Seletivo ──────────────────────────────────────
3833| 'on_enter': 'registro entrar na etapa',
3834| 'on_exit': 'registro avançar desta etapa',
3835| 'on_timeout': 'prazo da etapa ser atingido',
3836| 'on_scheduled_date': 'data agendada chegar',
3837| 'on_approved': 'candidato ser contratado',
3838| 'on_classified': 'candidato ser classificado',
3839| 'on_rejected': 'candidato ser reprovado',
3840| 'on_complete': 'etapa for concluída',
3841| 'on_evaluation_score': 'avaliação atingir nota',
3842| 'on_days_in_stage': 'registro estiver há X tempo nesta etapa',
3843| 'on_any_activity_complete': 'qualquer atividade for concluída',
3844| 'on_all_activities_complete': 'todas as atividades da etapa forem concluídas',
3845| 'on_onboarding_complete': 'colaborador concluir onboarding',
3846| 'on_offboarding_complete': 'colaborador concluir offboarding',
3847| 'on_days_after_start': 'X dias após início do processo',
3848| 'on_exit_date': 'data de desligamento chegar',
3849| 'on_days_after_group_published': 'X dias após a publicação do grupo',
3850| 'on_days_after_group_publish': 'X dias após a publicação do grupo',
3851| 'employee_enters_stage': 'colaborador entrar nesta etapa',
3852| 'candidate_enters_stage': 'candidato entrar nesta etapa',
3853| 'research_group_created': 'for criado grupo de pesquisa',
3854| 'structural_research_answered': 'pesquisa for respondida',
3855| 'field_changed': 'campo for alterado',
3856| 'status_changed': 'status mudar',
3857| 'manual_trigger': 'acionamento manual',
3858| // Advance/reject rule condition types
3859| 'condition_advance_score_above': 'nota da etapa atingir valor mínimo',
3860| 'condition_reject_score_below': 'nota da etapa ficar abaixo do mínimo',
3861| 'condition_advance_after_days': 'registro estiver há X tempo nesta etapa',
3862| 'condition_reject_after_timeout': 'prazo de X dias sem resposta ser atingido',
3863| 'condition_advance_on_complete': 'etapa for concluída',
3864| 'condition_advance_on_any_complete': 'qualquer atividade da etapa for concluída',
3865| 'advance_rule': 'regra de avanço for atingida',
3866| // ── CRM (por type) ────────────────────────────────────────
3867| 'crm_on_enter_funnel': 'registro entrar neste funil',
3868| 'crm_on_enter_stage': 'registro entrar em etapa específica',
3869| 'crm_on_days_in_funnel': 'Registro estiver há X tempo no funil',
3870| 'crm_on_priority_tag_change': 'Tag de prioridade do registro foi atualizada para',
Request #5
deepseek-v4-flash
P:19.08K C:182 CR:17.66K CW:0
1881ms
Reasoning
Let me see the fallback for action names after the map: e.g., at the end of the function, if no mapping, what happens? Let me read more after 4120 where the map ends, and how `conditionNames` and `actionLabels` are used.
Vou ver o restante da função `computeAutomationDisplayName` (após os mapas) para entender o fallback quando a chave não existe.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 4180, "file_path": "templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig", "start_line": 4120}
Result
File: templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig (Total lines: 5530)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 4120-4180
4120|
4121| var financialActionKeyLabels = {
4122| 'approve_refund': 'aprovar reembolso',
4123| 'reject_refund': 'reprovar reembolso',
4124| 'mark_refund_paid': 'marcar reembolso como pago',
4125| 'approve_payable': 'aprovar lançamento',
4126| 'reject_payable': 'reprovar lançamento',
4127| 'mark_payable_paid': 'marcar lançamento como pago',
4128| 'generate_cnab_remittance': 'gerar remessa CNAB',
4129| 'release_receivable_for_collection': 'liberar recebível para cobrança',
4130| 'reject_receivable': 'reprovar recebível',
4131| 'mark_receivable_received': 'marcar recebível como recebido',
4132| 'process_bank_return': 'processar retorno bancário',
4133| 'generate_new_remittance': 'gerar nova remessa',
4134| 'cancel_remittance': 'cancelar remessa',
4135| 'notify_requester': 'notificar solicitante',
4136| 'notify_approver': 'notificar aprovador',
4137| 'notify_owner': 'notificar responsável',
4138| 'require_reason': 'informar motivo da reprovação',
4139| 'open_communication_central_request': 'enviar solicitação para Central de Comunicação'
4140| };
4141|
4142| // Recipient labels for send_email / notification actions
4143| var recipientLabels = {
4144| 'candidate': 'candidato',
4145| 'responsible': 'responsável',
4146| 'flow_responsible': 'responsável do fluxo',
4147| 'interviewer': 'entrevistador',
4148| 'monitored_evaluator': 'avaliador',
4149| 'employee': 'colaborador',
4150| 'collaborator': 'colaborador',
4151| 'manager': 'gerente',
4152| 'direct_manager': 'gestor direto',
4153| 'administrators': 'administradores',
4154| 'company_member': 'membro específico',
4155| 'role': 'cargo',
4156| // CRM
4157| 'record_owner': 'responsável do registro',
4158| 'board_owner': 'responsável do quadro'
4159| };
4160|
4161| var parts = [];
4162|
4163| function pluralizeDia(n) {
4164| return n === 1 ? 'dia' : 'dias';
4165| }
4166|
4167| function formatTypeName(type) {
4168| if (!type) return '';
4169| return String(type).replace(/_/g, ' ').replace(/^on /, '').trim();
4170| }
4171|
4172| function getConditionDetail(cond) {
4173| if (!cond || !cond.config) { return ''; }
4174| var cfg = cond.config || {};
4175| var type = cond.type || '';
4176|
4177| if (type === 'on_days_in_stage'
4178| || type === 'condition_advance_after_days'
4179| || type === 'nps_on_days_without_response'
4180| || type === 'nps_on_days_after_evaluation'
Request #6
deepseek-v4-flash
P:20.15K C:1.49K CR:19.2K CW:0
10969ms
Reasoning
Let me look at where the actionLabels map is used in the flow_detail.html.twig function to understand fallback behavior (probably uses formatTypeName as fallback). Search for the usage after map. Let me continue reading after 4180 to find usage of the actionLabels variable.
Actually, the changes in both templates just add a mapping entry for the new action type. Given a fallback exists (`formatTypeName`), and these entries are purely cosmetic label improvements consistent with the rest. The change is correct.
Now for file 1, let me confirm what `prevEvts` is, to ensure there aren't other unguarded accesses in this same template (already checked—lines all guard with `prevEvts.termino`). The changed line now matches the pattern. This fix is in the scope of the PR. Good.
Wait — but there might be a subtle logic issue: the diff context at line 96-99 shows that the value of "Número Processo Trabalhista" now reads from `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab`. Let's consider whether `prevEvts.termino` could legitimately exist while `prevEvts.desligamento` is the event that has the info. The PR's scope is eSocial S-2299 (desligamento). The entity is `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento`. Hmm, wait. Let me reconsider.
Actually, this template is `member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig`. There are fields: `mtvDesligTsv` (motivo do desligamento TSV?), `dtTerm` (data termino), `nrProcTrab`. The change is: previously when opening this tab, if there's a `desligamento` event but no `termino` event, accessing `termino.nrProcTrab` would produce an error. Now guards properly on `termino`.
Hmm, but let me consider the semantics: this form section is "Motivo do Desligamento" with fields from the `termino` event (término). Fields like `mtvDesligTsv`, `dtTerm`, `nrProcTrab`. Let me check the entity `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` which has `mtvDesligTsv`, `dtTerm`, `nrProcTrab`. Wait, this entity changed in this PR (+4/-4). The template reads `prevEvts.termino` — that refers to S-2299 events presumably. The context `prevEvts` likely = previous eSocial events for the member grouped by type, where 'termino' = S-2299? Hmm, in eSocial, S-2299 is "Desligamento" (registro do desligamento do trabalhador), and "término" refers to TSV (S-2399 is "Término de Trabalhador Sem Vínculo"). The fields mtvDesligTsv: motivo desligamento do trabalhador sem vínculo (S-2399). nrProcTrab. dtTerm. So this form covers both S-2299 and S-2399? Hmm, this is the "esocial_termino" guide. Anyway.
The change is a simple null-guard fix. It's correct given the rest of file.
Now — is there an inconsistency: line 14-60 check `prevEvts.termino` but where would the S-2299 event data be? The PR says "Corrigido erro ao abrir a aba de desligamento quando `prevEvts.termino` ainda não existe." This fix ensures no crash. Fine.
Now let me double check whether there's still another bug: at line 99, after the fix, when `prevEvts.termino` exists but `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` is empty string, it displays empty — fine.
Now check the templates in the review group: These are template-only changes; nothing else needs adjusting. But let me search for other spots in the same templates that display action labels, e.g. maybe `list_automations.html.twig` has another function like `getTriggerLabel` with its own map that needs the new action - no, actions are not triggers.
Actually, wait — there's a real concern about scope: is there another map used to display actions in list_automations.html.twig? Let me search the file for the usage of getActionLabel and if there's also a second similar map in the same file for mobile display or something (duplicate maps). Also in flow_detail there's another map near the top? But for review purposes the diff changes are just adding key/label pairs; if there is a second map that also needs the key but wasn't updated, that would be worth a comment. Let me search both files for other occurrences of key lists that map automation action types, e.g. a default action types list, allowed action types used for validation or selection options (dropdown of available action types). Actually in list_automations, users might configure automation actions, and the dropdown list of available action types comes from server config (offboarding.yaml), not from these maps. These maps are for display.
Let me search for "financial_flow_action" in each file - since the new entry was inserted right before it in both files, checking whether there is any other list that contains 'financial_flow_action' but not the new key could reveal inconsistent display maps. For instance, there may be a second labels map in the same file (like in a mobile view or in a different function) that includes 'financial_flow_action' but not 'create_esocial_s2299_draft'.
Let me search.
Vou procurar nos dois templates se existem outros mapas/listas que também contêm `financial_flow_action` (referência vizinha à nova entrada) e poderiam ter ficado sem a chave nova, além de conferir o fallback de exibição.
Tool Calls (3)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig"], "search_text": "financial_flow_action"}
Result
File: templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig
Match lines: 3
533| 'financial_flow_action': 'Executar ação financeira',
596| if (type === 'financial_flow_action') {
620| } else if (type !== 'financial_flow_action') {
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig"], "search_text": "financial_flow_action"}
Result
File: templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig
Match lines: 2
4079| 'financial_flow_action': 'executar ação financeira',
4211| if (act.type === 'financial_flow_action') {
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "prevEvts", "file_patterns": ["templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/"]}
Result
File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig
Match lines: 10
14| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '01' %}
20| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '02' %}
26| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '03' %}
32| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '04' %}
38| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '05' %}
44| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '06' %}
50| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '07' %}
56| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '99' %}
81| value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.dtTerm %}{{ prevEvts.termino.dtTerm|date('Y-m-d') }}{% endif %}">
99| value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab %}{{ prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab }}{% endif %}">
File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/mudanca_cpf.html.twig
Match lines: 1
19| value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.novoCpf %}{{ prevEvts.termino.novoCpf }}{% endif %}">
File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/pensao_alimenticia.html.twig
Match lines: 8
14| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.pensAlim == '0' %}
20| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.pensAlim == '1' %}
26| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.pensAlim == '2' %}
32| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.pensAlim == '3' %}
58| value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.percAliment %}{{ prevEvts.termino.percAliment }}{% endif %}"
59| {% if prevEvts.termino and (prevEvts.termino.pensAlim == '1' or prevEvts.termino.pensAlim == '3') %}
82| value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.vrAlim %}{{ prevEvts.termino.vrAlim }}{% endif %}"
83| {% if prevEvts.termino and (prevEvts.termino.pensAlim == '2' or prevEvts.termino.pensAlim == '3') %}
File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/quarentena_remunerada.html.twig
Match lines: 3
14| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.indRemun == '1' %}
20| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.indRemun == '2' %}
41| value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.dtFimRemun %}{{ prevEvts.termino.dtFimRemun|date('Y-m-d') }}{% endif %}">
Request #7
deepseek-v4-flash
P:22.67K C:516 CR:21.63K CW:0
4285ms
Reasoning
Let me look at lines around 596-620 in list_automations.html.twig — there is handling for `financial_flow_action` type. Let's see whether there is any branch logic that needs the new type to be added too (e.g., a condition that special-cases financial_flow_action vs other). This could be an if that handles rendering that maybe doesn't need new type. Also in flow_detail.html.twig at 4211 there's `if (act.type === 'financial_flow_action')` branch. Since new type `create_esocial_s2299_draft` is not special-cased, but the generic path handles rendering fine. Let me read those sections for context to ensure there's no rendering issue for the new type, but keep in mind the review scope is limited to new added code lines. If the generic path is fine, no comment needed.
Actually, the key question is whether `getActionLabel` / `computeAutomationDisplayName` are only used to generate the human-readable label, and fallback formatting handles unknown keys. Since both now include the new key mapping, they will render properly. Any mismatch? The key in config yaml: `type: "create_esocial_s2299_draft"`, and maps key `create_esocial_s2299_draft`. Good.
Let me quickly read list_automations 590-640 and flow_detail 4200-4240 to verify nothing else needs the new type (only for contextual awareness).
Vou ler os trechos com tratamento especial para `financial_flow_action` nos dois templates, para garantir que o novo tipo não precise de tratamento análogo.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 660, "file_path": "templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig", "start_line": 580}
Result
File: templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig (Total lines: 823)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 580-660
580| 'mark_payable_paid': 'Marcar lançamento como pago',
581| 'generate_cnab_remittance': 'Gerar remessa CNAB',
582| 'release_receivable_for_collection': 'Liberar recebível para cobrança',
583| 'reject_receivable': 'Reprovar recebível',
584| 'mark_receivable_received': 'Marcar recebível como recebido',
585| 'process_bank_return': 'Processar retorno bancário',
586| 'generate_new_remittance': 'Gerar nova remessa',
587| 'cancel_remittance': 'Cancelar remessa',
588| 'notify_requester': 'Notificar solicitante',
589| 'notify_approver': 'Notificar aprovador',
590| 'notify_owner': 'Notificar responsável',
591| 'require_reason': 'Informar motivo da reprovação',
592| 'open_communication_central_request': 'Enviar solicitação para Central de Comunicação'
593| };
594|
595| let label = labels[type] || formatTypeName(type);
596| if (type === 'financial_flow_action') {
597| const actionKey = config?.action_key || config?.actionKey || '';
598| label = financialActionKeyLabels[actionKey] || label;
599| }
600|
601| if (config && config.label) {
602| if (type === 'move_to_stage' || /_move_to_stage$/.test(type || '')) {
603| const stageName = config.stageName || config.stageLabel || config.label;
604| label += ' (destino: ' + stageName + ')';
605| } else if (type === 'crm_action_move_funnel') {
606| label += ' (' + config.label + ')';
607| } else if (type === 'crm_action_move_stage') {
608| const boardName = config.boardName || '';
609| const stageName = config.stageName || config.label || '';
610| if (boardName && stageName) {
611| label += ' (' + boardName + ' › ' + stageName + ')';
612| } else if (stageName) {
613| label += ' (' + stageName + ')';
614| }
615| } else if (type === 'crm_action_priority') {
616| const priorityMap = { high: 'Alta', medium: 'Média', low: 'Baixa' };
617| label += ' → ' + (priorityMap[config.value] || config.label || config.value || '');
618| } else if (type === 'crm_action_custom_tag') {
619| label += ' "' + (config.value || config.label) + '"';
620| } else if (type !== 'financial_flow_action') {
621| label += ' (' + config.label + ')';
622| }
623| }
624|
625| return label;
626|}
627|
628|/**
629| * Formata nome de type em snake_case para texto legível
630| */
631|function formatTypeName(type) {
632| if (!type) return '';
633|
634| return type
635| .replace(/_/g, ' ')
636| .replace(/^on /, '')
637| .trim();
638|}
639|
640|/**
641| * Renderiza resumo de múltiplas condições/ações
642| * Formato melhorado: "Quando [condição] → [ação]"
643| */
644|function renderAutomationSummary(automation) {
645| const normalized = normalizeAutomation(automation);
646|
647| let conditionsText = '';
648| if (normalized.conditions.length === 0) {
649| conditionsText = 'Sem condições';
650| } else if (normalized.conditions.length === 1) {
651| const condition = normalized.conditions[0];
652| conditionsText = 'Quando ' + getConditionLabel(condition.type, condition.config).toLowerCase();
653| } else {
654| const firstCondition = normalized.conditions[0];
655| conditionsText = 'Quando ' + getConditionLabel(firstCondition.type, firstCondition.config).toLowerCase()
656| + ' e mais ' + (normalized.conditions.length - 1);
657| }
658|
659| let actionsText = '';
660| if (normalized.actions.length === 0) {
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 4300, "file_path": "templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig", "start_line": 4180}
Result
File: templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig (Total lines: 5530)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 4180-4300
4180| || type === 'nps_on_days_after_evaluation'
4181| || type === 'on_days_after_start'
4182| || type === 'on_days_after_group_published') {
4183| var rawDays = cfg.days !== undefined ? cfg.days : cfg.value;
4184| if (rawDays !== undefined && rawDays !== null && rawDays !== '') {
4185| var daysNum = parseInt(rawDays, 10);
4186| if (!isNaN(daysNum) && daysNum > 0) {
4187| return ' (' + daysNum + ' ' + pluralizeDia(daysNum) + ')';
4188| }
4189| return ' (' + rawDays + ')';
4190| }
4191| }
4192|
4193| var val = cfg.label || cfg.value;
4194| if (val !== undefined && val !== '') { return ' (' + val + ')'; }
4195| return '';
4196| }
4197|
4198| // Part 1 – condition
4199| if (conditions.length > 0) {
4200| var cond = conditions[0];
4201| var condLabel = conditionNames[cond.type] || formatTypeName(cond.type);
4202| var detail = getConditionDetail(cond);
4203| var suffix = conditions.length > 1 ? ' e mais ' + (conditions.length - 1) : '';
4204| parts.push('Quando ' + condLabel + detail + suffix);
4205| }
4206|
4207| // Part 2 – action
4208| if (actions.length > 0) {
4209| var act = actions[0];
4210| var actLabel = actionNames[act.type] || formatTypeName(act.type);
4211| if (act.type === 'financial_flow_action') {
4212| var actionKey = (act.config && (act.config.action_key || act.config.actionKey)) || '';
4213| actLabel = financialActionKeyLabels[actionKey]
4214| || (act.config && (act.config.actionLabel || act.config.label))
4215| || actLabel;
4216| }
4217| var actDetail = '';
4218|
4219| if (
4220| act.type === 'send_email'
4221| || act.type === 'email'
4222| || String(act.type || '').indexOf('send_email_') === 0
4223| || String(act.type || '').indexOf('send_alert_') === 0
4224| || act.type === 'notify'
4225| || act.type === 'notification'
4226| || act.type === 'request_notification'
4227| || act.type === 'bpm_notification'
4228| || act.type === 'send_bpm_notification'
4229| ) {
4230| var to = '';
4231| if (act.config) {
4232| to = act.config.to || act.config.recipient || act.config.recipient_type || '';
4233| }
4234| if (to && recipientLabels[to]) {
4235| actDetail = ' ' + recipientLabels[to];
4236| }
4237| } else if (act.type === 'move_to_stage' && act.config) {
4238| var stageLabel = act.config.stageName || act.config.stageLabel || act.config.label || act.config.value;
4239| if (stageLabel) { actDetail = ' (' + stageLabel + ')'; }
4240| } else if (
4241| (act.type === 'financial_refund_move_to_stage'
4242| || act.type === 'financial_payable_move_to_stage'
4243| || act.type === 'financial_receivable_move_to_stage'
4244| || act.type === 'financial_bank_move_to_stage')
4245| && act.config
4246| ) {
4247| var financialStageLabel = act.config.stageName || act.config.stageLabel || act.config.label || act.config.value;
4248| if (financialStageLabel) { actDetail = ' (' + financialStageLabel + ')'; }
4249| } else if (act.type === 'crm_action_move_funnel' && act.config) {
4250| // CRM: mover para funil — mostra nome do funil destino
4251| var funnelLabel = act.config.label || act.config.funnelName || act.config.value;
4252| if (funnelLabel) { actDetail = ' (' + funnelLabel + ')'; }
4253| } else if (act.type === 'crm_action_move_stage' && act.config) {
4254| // CRM: mover para etapa de quadro específico — mostra quadro + etapa
4255| var boardLabel = act.config.boardName || '';
4256| var stepLabel = act.config.stageName || act.config.label || '';
4257| if (boardLabel && stepLabel) {
4258| actDetail = ' (' + boardLabel + ' › ' + stepLabel + ')';
4259| } else if (stepLabel) {
4260| actDetail = ' (' + stepLabel + ')';
4261| }
4262| } else if (act.type === 'crm_action_priority' && act.config) {
4263| // CRM: atualizar prioridade — mostra o nível escolhido
4264| var priorityMap = { high: 'Alta', medium: 'Média', low: 'Baixa' };
4265| var pLabel = priorityMap[act.config.value] || act.config.label || act.config.value;
4266| if (pLabel) { actDetail = ' → ' + pLabel; }
4267| } else if (act.type === 'crm_action_custom_tag' && act.config) {
4268| // CRM: adicionar tag personalizada — mostra o nome da tag
4269| var tagLabel = act.config.value || act.config.label;
4270| if (tagLabel) { actDetail = ' "' + tagLabel + '"'; }
4271| } else if ((act.type === 'crm_action_notify_owner' || act.type === 'crm_action_notify_board') && act.config) {
4272| // CRM: notificação — mostra o assunto se disponível
4273| var subjectLabel = act.config.subject || act.config.label;
4274| if (subjectLabel) { actDetail = ': ' + subjectLabel; }
4275| } else if ((act.type === 'crm_action_conversion_probability' || act.type === 'crm_update_conversion_probability') && act.config) {
4276| // CRM: atualizar probabilidade de conversão — mostra o valor (Alta, Média, Baixa)
4277| var probLabel = act.config.label || act.config.value || act.config.id;
4278| if (probLabel) { actDetail = ' → ' + probLabel; }
4279| } else if ((act.type === 'crm_action_send_request_notification' || act.type === 'crm_send_request_notification') && act.config) {
4280| // CRM: enviar notificação de solicitação — mostra o tipo (Enviar para NPS, Gerar Contrato com IA)
4281| var requestLabel = act.config.actionLabel || act.config.label || act.config.value;
4282| if (requestLabel) { actDetail = ' (' + requestLabel + ')'; }
4283| } else if (act.type === 'nps_action_send_request_notification' && act.config) {
4284| var npsActionType = act.config.actionType || '';
4285| var npsReqMap = {
4286| 'enviar_convite': 'Enviar convite',
4287| 'enviar_convite_reengajamento': 'Reenviar convite (reengajamento)'
4288| };
4289| var npsReqLabel = act.config.actionLabel || act.config.label || npsReqMap[npsActionType] || npsActionType;
4290| if (npsReqLabel) { actDetail = ' (' + npsReqLabel + ')'; }
4291| } else if (act.type === 'nps_action_evaluation_contact_followup' && act.config) {
4292| var npsEvParts = [];
4293| if (act.config.notify_record_owner) { npsEvParts.push('responsável'); }
4294| if (act.config.notify_administrators) { npsEvParts.push('admins'); }
4295| if (act.config.send_registration_request) { npsEvParts.push('solicitação de novo card'); }
4296| if (npsEvParts.length) { actDetail = ' (' + npsEvParts.join(', ') + ')'; }
4297| }
4298| // crm_action_convert_to_contact: sem detalhe extra
4299|
4300| var actSuffix = actions.length > 1 ? ' e mais ' + (actions.length - 1) : '';
Request #8
deepseek-v4-flash
P:26.38K C:1.2K CR:23.17K CW:0
8437ms
Reasoning
The maps in both files are used with fallback `formatTypeName`, so the new keys are cosmetic. Both templates add them consistently.
Now, back to file 1 (motivo_desligamento.html.twig). The change fixes a potential issue where `prevEvts.desligamento` was truthy but `prevEvts.termino` null → accessing `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` would throw. Given that the entire template now consistently checks `prevEvts.termino`, this fix is consistent.
But wait: could this introduce a subtle behavior change? Previously, if `desligamento` existed (S-2299 event pending) but no `termino`... the value shown was from `termino` anyway. Actually before this fix, the value was `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` but guarded by `prevEvts.desligamento`. Hmm, that means: if only `desligamento` exists and no `termino` event — then in non-strict Twig, `prevEvts.termino` is null → accessing `.nrProcTrab` on null → Twig returns null with no error? In Twig, when strict_variables is false, accessing an attribute on null yields null (Twig 1.x, 2.x, 3.x behavior — actually in Twig 3, null is not an object, but "item.attr" on null returns null by default unless strict). Twig does throw an error for "Call to a member function ... on null" only in strict mode. Let me recall: In Twig, if `foo` is null and you access `foo.bar`, Twig 3 default (strict_variables=false) returns null without error. So why was there an error?
Hmm, the user background says "Corrigido erro ao abrir a aba de desligamento quando prevEvts.termino ainda não existe." Perhaps the error is about something else — maybe `prevEvts.desligamento` returns an object whose check is truthy while `termino` is null; in strict_variables mode this could throw. Or maybe the issue: `prevEvts` is an object of type that throws in `__get`? Regardless, the fix is safe and aligns with the rest of file.
Actually wait — is the issue in the other direction? Could `prevEvts.termino` be an object with a property accessor that errors when `desligamento` doesn't exist? We can't confirm; but the fix is clearly an improvement, consistent with the pattern used throughout the rest of the file and with sibling templates (pensao_alimenticia, mudanca_cpf, quarentena_remunerada all check `prevEvts.termino and ...`).
Now for the review comments: is there anything wrong in the three changes?
1. motivo_desligamento.html.twig — fix is fine. But should we comment that line 96/99... no issue.
Actually, let me think again about this template change from the perspective of "eSocial S-2299 draft data pre-filled". The offboarding automation creates `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento`. When the member guide opens the "Motivo do Desligamento" tab, it shows data from `prevEvts.termino` (pre-filled values). But now this template reads `termino.nrProcTrab`. Hmm, but S-2299 desligamento entity — if `prevEvts.desligamento` is the S-2299 event draft and `prevEvts.termino` is S-2399 termino... Actually "esocial_termino" likely refers to the guide for the S-2399 (término) events. Actually the fields `mtvDesligTsv` means "motivo desligamento do Trabalhador Sem Vínculo" — that belongs to S-2399 (término de trabalhador sem vínculo), which is the "termino" event. And S-2299 (desligamento) is the regular dismissal event with different fields. Hmm, but the same template has `dtTerm`, `nrProcTrab`, both relevant to S-2299 too.
Anyway, for this PR scope, the fix is in the right direction: without a previous termino event the tab crashed. Given how the guard matches rest of file, this is fine and even a required fix to support the flow where the draft was created by the automation before user opens the tab? Hmm, wait, but if automation creates S-2299 event that appears as `prevEvts.desligamento`, but the tab displays only from `prevEvts.termino`... There is a naming question. This is out of our ability to verify deeply because we only see the template. We might check how `prevEvts` is built in the controller to see keys (desligamento, termino, etc.).
Let me search for where the template gets prevEvts (controller). Search for "prevEvts" across codebase (php controllers).
Vou localizar o controlador que monta `prevEvts` para entender as chaves `desligamento`/`termino` e verificar se o guard corrigido é coerente com o que é populado.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "prevEvts", "file_patterns": ["src/", "*.php"]}
Result
File: src/Controller/CompanyController.php Match lines: 2 3257| $prevEvts = $this->getEvtsData($company, $esocialTrabalhadorData); 3365| 'prevEvts' => $prevEvts,
Request #9
deepseek-v4-flash
P:27.65K C:108 CR:27.52K CW:0
1351ms
Reasoning
Let me read around CompanyController 3200-3370 to see how prevEvts is built.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 3370, "file_path": "src/Controller/CompanyController.php", "start_line": 3200}
Result
File: src/Controller/CompanyController.php (Total lines: 7133)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 3200-3370
3200| 'id' => $member_res->getId(),
3201| 'user' => $user ?? null,
3202| 'name' => $name,
3203| 'email' => $email,
3204| 'avatar' => $avatar,
3205| 'linkedin' => $linkedin ?? null,
3206| 'phone' => $phone ?? null,
3207| 'role' => $member_res->getRole() ? $member_res->getRole() : '',
3208| 'position' => $member_res->getRoleMember() ? $member_res->getRoleMember()->getName() : '',
3209| 'positionId' => $member_res->getRoleMember() ? $member_res->getRoleMember()->getId() : null,
3210| 'departmentId' => $member_res->getDepartment() ? $member_res->getDepartment()->getId() : null,
3211| 'departmentName' => $member_res->getDepartment() ? $member_res->getDepartment()->getName() : null,
3212| 'costCenterId' => $member_res->getCostCenter() ? $member_res->getCostCenter()->getId() : null,
3213| 'costCenterLabel' => $member_res->getCostCenter() ? $member_res->getCostCenter()->getTitle() : null,
3214| 'superiorId' => $member_res->getSuperior() ? $member_res->getSuperior()->getId() : null,
3215| 'superiorName' => $member_res->getSuperior() ? $member_res->getSuperior()->getFullName() : null,
3216| 'positionType' => $member_res->getPositionType(),
3217| 'positionTypeLabel' => $member_res->getPositionTypeLabel(),
3218| 'roleMember' => $member_res->getRoleMember()
3219| ? [
3220| 'id' => $member_res->getRoleMember()->getId(),
3221| 'name' => $member_res->getRoleMember()->getName(),
3222| 'cbo' => $member_res->getRoleMember()->getCbo(),
3223| ]
3224| : null,
3225| 'active' => $member_res->getEnabled(),
3226| 'team' => $member_res->getTeams(),
3227| 'compiled_teams' => $compiled_teams,
3228| 'group' => $member_res->getGroups(),
3229| 'job_level' => $member_res->getJobLevel(),
3230| 'department' => $member_res->getDepartment(),
3231| 'hasCrown' => $member_res->getHasCrown() ?? false,
3232| 'linkedProviderCompany' => $linkedProviderCompanyLabel,
3233| 'linkedCompanyDisplay' => $linkedCompanyDisplay,
3234| 'employmentBond' => $member_res->getEmploymentBond(),
3235| 'employmentBondLabel' => $employmentBondLabel,
3236| ];
3237| $compiled_teams = [];
3238| foreach ($teams as $t) {
3239| $compiled_teams[$t->getId()] = $t->getName();
3240| }
3241|
3242| $esocialTablesData = $this->getEsocialTablesData();
3243| $esocialTrabalhador = $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosTrabalhador::class)->findBy(['companyMember' => $companyMember['id']]);
3244| // Busca o Profile apenas se o CompanyMember tiver um User associado
3245| $profileData = null;
3246| if ($member_res->getUser()) {
3247| $profileData = $em->getRepository(Profile::class)->findOneBy(['user' => $member_res->getUser()->getId()]);
3248| }
3249|
3250| // Aplica o merge inteligente dos dados
3251| $esocialTrabalhadorData = $this->mergeEsocialTrabalhadorData($esocialTrabalhador, $profileData);
3252|
3253| $esocialRemuneracaoData = $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class)->findByTrabalhadorArray($esocialTrabalhador);
3254| $esocialRubricasData = $em->getRepository(EsocialS1010EvtTabRubrica::class)->findBy(['company' => $company]);
3255| $esocialEstabData = $em->getRepository(EsocialS1005EvtTabEstab::class)->findByEventoEnviado($company);
3256| $categorias = $em->getRepository(EsocialCategoriasTrabalhadores::class)->findAll();
3257| $prevEvts = $this->getEvtsData($company, $esocialTrabalhadorData);
3258| $myCompany = $em->getRepository(Company::class)->findOneBy(['id' => $company->getId()]);
3259|
3260| $natJudrid = $myCompany->getLegalNatureCode();
3261|
3262| $cargos = $em->getRepository(Roles::class)->findBy(['company' => $company]);
3263|
3264| $departments = $em->getRepository(CompanyArea::class)
3265| ->findAvailableForCompany($company->getId());
3266|
3267| $costCenterEntities = $em->getRepository(\App\Entity\CostCenter::class)->findBy([
3268| 'deletedAt' => null,
3269| ], ['code' => 'ASC']);
3270| $costCenters = [];
3271| foreach ($costCenterEntities as $costCenter) {
3272| $label = trim(($costCenter->getCode() ?? '') . ' - ' . ($costCenter->getTitle() ?? ''));
3273| $costCenters[] = [
3274| 'id' => $costCenter->getId(),
3275| 'label' => $label !== '-' ? $label : ($costCenter->getTitle() ?? $costCenter->getCode()),
3276| ];
3277| }
3278| $managerOptions = $em->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->findBy(['company' => $company, 'isRemoved' => 0]);
3279|
3280| // Busca o status dos eventos do eSocial
3281| $esocialStatus = $this->getEsocialMemberStatus($companyMember['id']);
3282| $esocialUniqueEventIds = $this->buildEsocialUniqueEventIdsMap($esocialStatus);
3283|
3284| $admin = $this->security->getUser()->isSuperAdmin() || $this->security->getUser()->isManager();
3285|
3286| $autRepo = $em->getRepository(GovernanceAuthorization::class);
3287| $autorizacoes = $autRepo->findByMember($member_res);
3288| $autorizacoesData = [];
3289| $autorizacoesVinculadasCatalog = [];
3290| foreach ($autorizacoes as $autorizacao) {
3291| $vinculo = null;
3292| foreach ($autorizacao->getColaboradoresVinculos() as $link) {
3293| if ($link instanceof GovernanceAuthorizationCollaborator
3294| && $link->getCompanyMember()?->getId() === $member_res->getId()) {
3295| $vinculo = $link;
3296| break;
3297| }
3298| }
3299| if (!$vinculo instanceof GovernanceAuthorizationCollaborator) {
3300| continue;
3301| }
3302| $autorizacoesData[] = $authorizationComplianceViewService->buildMemberProfileCard(
3303| $autorizacao,
3304| $vinculo,
3305| $company
3306| );
3307|
3308| $requisitosDetalhesVinculados = $authorizationConditionConfig->buildRequirementDetailsForFrontend(
3309| $company,
3310| $autorizacao->getRequisitosList(),
3311| );
3312| $autorizacoesVinculadasCatalog[] = [
3313| 'id' => $autorizacao->getId(),
3314| 'titulo' => $autorizacao->getTitulo(),
3315| 'requisitos' => $autorizacao->getRequisitosList(),
3316| 'requisitos_detalhes' => $requisitosDetalhesVinculados,
3317| ];
3318| }
3319|
3320| // Autorizações criadas no módulo SSMA que este membro ainda não possui
3321| $todasCompanyAuts = $autRepo->findBy(['company' => $company], ['titulo' => 'ASC']);
3322| $autorizacoesSsma = [];
3323| foreach ($todasCompanyAuts as $a) {
3324| if (!$autRepo->memberParticipates($a, $member_res)) {
3325| $requisitosDetalhes = $authorizationConditionConfig->buildRequirementDetailsForFrontend(
3326| $company,
3327| $a->getRequisitosList(),
3328| );
3329| $autorizacoesSsma[] = [
3330| 'id' => $a->getId(),
3331| 'titulo' => $a->getTitulo(),
3332| 'requisitos' => $a->getRequisitosList(),
3333| 'requisitos_detalhes' => $requisitosDetalhes,
3334| ];
3335| }
3336| }
3337|
3338| $viewer = $this->security->getUser();
3339| $canViewMetaHumanStrategicActionsBlock = $viewer instanceof User
3340| && $metaHumanProfessionalDossierAccessService->canViewStrategicActionsBlock($viewer, $company, $member_res);
3341|
3342| $memberBondForm = $serviceProvisionService->buildMemberBondFormData($company, $member_res);
3343|
3344| return $this->render('company/member_v2_figma.html.twig', [
3345| 'admin' => $admin,
3346| 'member' => $companyMember,
3347| 'isThirdPartyMember' => $isThirdPartyMember,
3348| 'memberBondForm' => $memberBondForm,
3349| 'thirdPartyMissingProviderLink' => $thirdPartyMissingProviderLink,
3350| 'serviceProvision' => $serviceProvision,
3351| 'thirdPartyDocuments' => $thirdPartyDocuments,
3352| 'canViewMetaHumanStrategicActionsBlock' => $canViewMetaHumanStrategicActionsBlock,
3353| 'teams' => $teams,
3354| 'compiled_teams' => $compiled_teams,
3355| 'codCategoria' => $esocialTablesData['codCategoria'],
3356| 'paises' => $esocialTablesData['paises'],
3357| 'tpLogradouro' => $esocialTablesData['tpLogradouro'],
3358| 'tpDependentes' => $esocialTablesData['tpDependentes'],
3359| 'tpAfastamento' => $esocialTablesData['tpAfastamento'],
3360| 'cbo' => $esocialTablesData['cbo'],
3361| 'esocialTrabalhadorData' => $esocialTrabalhadorData,
3362| 'esocialRemuneracaoData' => $esocialRemuneracaoData,
3363| 'esocialRubricasData' => $this->formatEsocialRubricasData($esocialRubricasData),
3364| 'categorias' => $categorias,
3365| 'prevEvts' => $prevEvts,
3366| 'natJurid' => $natJudrid,
3367| 'esocialEstabData' => $esocialEstabData,
3368| 'cargos' => $cargos,
3369| 'costCenters' => $costCenters,
3370| 'managerOptions' => $managerOptions,
Request #10
deepseek-v4-flash
P:30.64K C:122 CR:27.65K CW:0
1815ms
Reasoning
Let me look at `getEvtsData` method to understand the keys (desligamento, termino, etc.).
Vou localizar o método `getEvtsData` para ver as chaves de `prevEvts`.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/CompanyController.php"], "search_text": "function getEvtsData"}
Result
File: src/Controller/CompanyController.php Match lines: 1 6324| private function getEvtsData(Company $company, $trabalhador)
Request #11
deepseek-v4-flash
P:30.82K C:87 CR:30.72K CW:0
1538ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 6470, "file_path": "src/Controller/CompanyController.php", "start_line": 6324}
Result
File: src/Controller/CompanyController.php (Total lines: 7133)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 6324-6470
6324| private function getEvtsData(Company $company, $trabalhador)
6325| {
6326| $em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
6327| $events = $em->getRepository(EsocialEvents::class)->findBy(['company' => $company]);
6328|
6329| $evtS2299 = null;
6330| $evtS2230 = null;
6331| $evtS2399 = null;
6332| $evtS2298 = null;
6333| $evtS2200 = null;
6334| $evtS1200 = null;
6335|
6336| // Verifica se $trabalhador é um array e se tem dados
6337| if (empty($trabalhador) || !is_array($trabalhador) || !isset($trabalhador[0])) {
6338| return [
6339| 'desligamento' => $evtS2299,
6340| 'afastamento' => $evtS2230,
6341| 'termino' => $evtS2399,
6342| 'reintegracao' => $evtS2298,
6343| 'admissao' => $evtS2200,
6344| 'remuneracao' => $evtS1200,
6345| ];
6346| }
6347|
6348| // Obtém o ID do trabalhador - $trabalhador[0] é um array com dados formatados
6349| $trabalhadorId = $trabalhador[0]['id'] ?? null;
6350|
6351| if (!$trabalhadorId) {
6352| return [
6353| 'desligamento' => $evtS2299,
6354| 'afastamento' => $evtS2230,
6355| 'termino' => $evtS2399,
6356| 'reintegracao' => $evtS2298,
6357| 'admissao' => $evtS2200,
6358| 'remuneracao' => $evtS1200,
6359| ];
6360| }
6361|
6362| foreach ($events as $event) {
6363| if ($event instanceof EsocialS2200EvtAdmissao && $event->getEsocialTrabalhador() !== null) {
6364| $evt = $event->getEsocialTrabalhador()->getId();
6365| if ($evt === $trabalhadorId) {
6366| $evtS2200 = $event;
6367| }
6368| } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS1200EvtRemun && $event->getDadosRemuneracao() !== null && $event->getDadosRemuneracao()->getEsocialTrabalhador() !== null) {
6369| $evt = $event->getDadosRemuneracao()->getEsocialTrabalhador()->getId();
6370| if ($evt === $trabalhadorId) {
6371| $evtS1200 = $event;
6372| }
6373| } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $event->getEsocialTrabalhador() !== null) {
6374| $evt = $event->getEsocialTrabalhador()->getId();
6375| if ($evt === $trabalhadorId) {
6376| $evtS2299 = $event;
6377| }
6378| } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS2230EvtAfastTemp && $event->getEsocialTrabalhador() !== null) {
6379| $evt = $event->getEsocialTrabalhador()->getId();
6380| if ($evt === $trabalhadorId) {
6381| $evtS2230 = $event;
6382| }
6383| } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino && $event->getDadosRemuneracao()->getEsocialTrabalhador() !== null) {
6384| $evt = $event->getDadosRemuneracao()->getEsocialTrabalhador()->getId();
6385| if ($evt === $trabalhadorId) {
6386| $evtS2399 = $event;
6387| }
6388| } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS2298EvtReintegr && $event->getEsocialTrabalhador() !== null) {
6389| $evt = $event->getEsocialTrabalhador()->getId();
6390| if ($evt === $trabalhadorId) {
6391| $evtS2298 = $event;
6392| }
6393| }
6394| }
6395|
6396| return [
6397| 'desligamento' => $evtS2299,
6398| 'afastamento' => $evtS2230,
6399| 'termino' => $evtS2399,
6400| 'reintegracao' => $evtS2298,
6401| 'admissao' => $evtS2200,
6402| 'remuneracao' => $evtS1200,
6403| ];
6404| }
6405|
6406| /**
6407| * Merge inteligente dos dados do eSocial com dados de fallback para exibição
6408| * Retorna array formatado para o frontend, priorizando dados existentes do eSocial
6409| */
6410| private function mergeEsocialTrabalhadorData($esocialData, $profileData): array
6411| {
6412| if (empty($esocialData)) {
6413| // Se não há dados do eSocial, retorna dados de fallback formatados
6414| return [$this->formatProfileData($profileData)];
6415| }
6416|
6417| // Se há dados do eSocial, retorna formatados (prioridade total para dados existentes)
6418| $formatted = $this->formatEsocialTrabalhadorData($esocialData);
6419|
6420| if ($profileData instanceof Profile) {
6421| foreach ($formatted as &$item) {
6422| if (!isset($item['dadosTrabalhador']) || !is_array($item['dadosTrabalhador'])) {
6423| continue;
6424| }
6425|
6426| if (empty($item['dadosTrabalhador']['fonePrinc'])) {
6427| $item['dadosTrabalhador']['fonePrinc'] = $profileData->getPhone() ?? '';
6428| }
6429|
6430| if (empty($item['dadosTrabalhador']['emailPrinc'])) {
6431| $item['dadosTrabalhador']['emailPrinc'] = $profileData->getEmail() ?? '';
6432| }
6433| }
6434| unset($item);
6435| }
6436|
6437| return $formatted;
6438| }
6439|
6440| /**
6441| * Formata dados de fallback para exibição no frontend
6442| * Estrutura similar ao formatEsocialTrabalhadorData
6443| */
6444| private function formatProfileData($profileData): array
6445| {
6446| if (!$profileData instanceof Profile) {
6447| $profileData = null;
6448| }
6449|
6450| return [
6451| 'dadosTrabalhador' => [
6452| 'nmTrab' => $profileData ? trim($profileData->getFirstName() . ' ' . $profileData->getLastName()) : '',
6453| 'cpfTrab' => $profileData?->getCpf() ?? '',
6454| 'sexo' => $profileData ? $this->getCodigoSexo($profileData->getGenero()) : '',
6455| 'dtNascto' => $profileData?->getNascimento(),
6456| 'nmSoc' => $profileData?->getNomeSocial() ?? '',
6457| 'fonePrinc' => $profileData?->getPhone() ?? '',
6458| 'emailPrinc' => $profileData?->getEmail() ?? '',
6459| 'racaCor' => '',
6460| 'estCiv' => '',
6461| 'grauInstr' => '',
6462| 'paisNascto' => $profileData ? $this->getCodigoPaisBrasil($profileData->getNationality()) : '',
6463| 'paisNac' => $profileData ? $this->getCodigoPaisBrasil($profileData->getNationality()) : '',
6464| 'dtAltDadosPessoais' => null,
6465| 'numeroCnh' => '',
6466| 'categoriaCnh' => '',
6467| 'dtValidadeCnh' => null,
6468| ],
6469| 'endereco' => [
6470| 'brasil' => [
Request #12
deepseek-v4-flash
P:33.14K C:3.05K CR:30.85K CW:0
22541ms
Reasoning
Now I understand. `prevEvts` has keys:
- desligamento → EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
- termino → EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino
The template `motivo_desligamento.html.twig` reads fields from `prevEvts.termino` (S-2399 event: mtvDesligTsv, dtTerm, nrProcTrab). But actually, this form covers the "desligamento" S-2299? Hmm, wait. The template directory name `esocial_termino` suggests it's the S-2399 "término" guide, but the section ID is `termino-motivo-desligamento`... Hmm.
Actually the field `mtvDesligTsv` is a S-2299 field? In eSocial S-2299, "motivo do desligamento" is field `mtvDeslig` in S-2299 for regular employees; S-2399 (TSV Termino) has field `mtvDesligTSV`. So `mtvDesligTsv` indicates the entity `EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino` (Trabalhador Sem Vínculo). But wait, the template reads `prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv` — matching the entity EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino? But `prevEvts.termino` is keyed to the `termino` (S-2399). Yes, so all these fields come from S-2399 termino.
Now, the bug fix: line 99 previously was `prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab`. If a member has an S-2299 desligamento record but no S-2399 termino, then `prevEvts.termino` is null, and accessing `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` — in Twig non-strict mode returns null (safe). Hmm, but then why the fix "Corrigido erro ao abrir a aba de desligamento quando prevEvts.termino ainda não existe."?
Wait, re-read the original line carefully:
```
value="{% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab %}{{ prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab }}{% endif %}">
```
With `prevEvts.termino` null, Twig evaluates `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab`. In Twig, if strict_variables is false (default), accessing an attribute of null yields null without error. However, this codebase may have `strict_variables: true` in twig config. Actually wait: The error could also be a Twig "Impossible to access an attribute" — no, that is for arrays not having the key with strict variables. Actually for a null, if strict_variables enabled, error "Impossible to invoke a method (nrProcTrab) on a null variable" arises.
Whether the bug truly manifested depends on twig config. The fix to check `prevEvts.termino` first is correct and matches the rest of the template.
Actually, let's look at the diff again. The PR fix description says exactly this. And the test result says "abrir aba de desligamento/eSocial do membro e confirmar que não ocorre erro de acesso a nrProcTrab quando não houver evento anterior." So the fix makes line 99 consistent. Good.
Is there any leftover bug in the file after the fix? Consider the reverse: when there is `termino` (S-2399) but no `desligamento`... the value is displayed from termino. Fine. When neither exists... empty. Fine.
Now let's check for remaining issues with the change: the fix references `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab`. But the field displayed is "Número Processo Trabalhista" under "Motivo do Desligamento" section. In this guide (esocial_termino), is `nrProcTrab` on the S-2399 entity? We should confirm EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino has `nrProcTrab`. Search for other templates using nrProcTrab with termino. Also the entity `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` was changed in this PR (+4/-4) and repository changed for IndPagtoApi. This PR also changed this template's guard. But the template change to `prevEvts.termino` means it reads S-2399 data — that's consistent.
OK so all three changes in the review group look fine. Let me double-check for the possibility that the templates (files 2 and 3) miss updating other labels maps that would matter, e.g., in `list_automations.html.twig` there may be also a map for "action labels" used in chat/list of recent activity, etc. But given these display-only with fallback formatTypeName, the missing entry would just show "create esocial s2299 draft" as fallback (lowercase-ish ugly). The entries were added in both relevant spots within the files. Wait, but we should confirm these are the only two display maps for automation actions across these two templates. Search each template file for `'financial_flow_action'` returned only these matches, one per file. But there could be other label maps (like `getTriggerLabel` for conditions). The action keys appear in both maps, so fine.
One more possible issue: In list_automations.html.twig the new entry is inserted after 'request_notification' (near the end of a generic block). The map order doesn't matter for objects. Fine.
Check flow_detail.html.twig entry placement: added between 'stage_change_previous' and 'financial_flow_action'. Fine.
Potential issue: duplicated keys in `list_automations.html.twig` - there are duplicate `'send_request_notification'` keys (lines 498 and 528) but that's pre-existing, not in scope.
Now, let's consider whether the template label could be shown for an action of type `create_esocial_s2299_draft` in the flow detail page. In migration, the action type is exactly `create_esocial_s2299_draft`. Good.
Now check for the JS syntax validity: the entries use quoted keys with single quotes; consistent.
Let me verify that in `flow_detail.html.twig` there isn't a second place displaying automation summaries (like a separate `renderAutomationSummary`) which may have its own map. Since these templates are huge (5530 and 823 lines), there may be other maps not containing the new key. But is it our role to require every map updated? For consistency, a missing map that has financial_flow_action would be suspicious. We searched for 'financial_flow_action' within each file and each appears only once (the map where the new key was added). But the absence of a second map that lists 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' is not a problem since these maps are the only ones listing action types as far as we can see.
However, wait: in `flow_detail.html.twig`, line 4631 uses computeAutomationDisplayName. Is there another function that renders automation summary in a dropdown of actions in the edit UI, like a list with action type options? Possibly the flow builder (when editing) lists available actions from the server config. Not within scope.
Let me also verify that in `list_automations.html.twig`, the new label is used somewhere that displays action summaries, and the trigger condition type for the new offboarding flow — e.g., `employee_enters_stage`. No need.
OK. Let me check if there might be a mismatch in the label key between the two templates and the config: both use `create_esocial_s2299_draft`. Config id/type is `create_esocial_s2299_draft`. Migration actionType is `create_esocial_s2299_draft`. All consistent.
Given the user instructions, comment only when there's an issue. So far no clear issues.
But wait — we should be careful about one thing on file 1. Let me consider the possibility that the fix changed the source of truth from `desligamento` to `termino`. If the eSocial S-2299 desligamento event is the draft created by the new automation (`EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` = desligamento key), and the form intended to prefill from the desligamento draft for review — then switching to `termino` may be semantically questionable. However, this whole tab is about the S-2399 termino TSV fields (mtvDesligTsv with "Exoneração do diretor não empregado" options etc. are TSV-specific). Actually S-2299 desligamento can also be for director without employment (diretor não empregado) — those motives 01-06 are common in S-2299? Hmm. The template directory is `member_guides_esocial_termino`, so this entire tab is part of the "eSocial Término" guide (S-2399 events). The tab is titled "Motivo do Desligamento" but it's in the termino guide. So reading from `prevEvts.termino` is right.
But hold on — was the pre-fix bug precisely the trigger for this PR, i.e., the automation now creates an S-2299 desligamento event (via `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento`) for a normal employee dismissal, and then when the member profile loads, `prevEvts.desligamento` becomes non-null while `prevEvts.termino` remains null (normal employee without TSV termino), and the template at line 99 would evaluate `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` on null → Twig error in strict mode. So the fix is exactly to guard.
So in normal-employee dismissal (S-2299), the field shows empty, which is expected as there is no termino event for a CLT employee.
Alright, nothing to report for file 1.
Let me look at the test files to check coverage? Not part of review group.
Now, is there any XSS/security concern? No, the changes are label maps with static strings, plus a Twig guard fix that outputs entity value already used elsewhere (values from entities displayed with default escaping `{{ }}`). Since `{{ prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab }}` is auto-escaped, no XSS issue.
Now check if there are other places in this template file 1 that access unguarded props that were missed — but unchanged lines aren't in scope. Only comment on newly added code. The only new code is line 99 guard fix which is fine.
Should we comment anything at all? The task says "If no obvious code issues are found... call task_done." We have done our due diligence. Let me also double-check these maps are placed within functions properly and no missing commas. New entries in list_automations added before `'financial_flow_action'` line with comma: line 532 ends with comma. Good. In flow_detail, line 4078 ends with comma. Good.
One more consideration for scope/consistency: `list_automations.html.twig` and `flow_detail.html.twig` label maps are display-only. There might be other UI (e.g., mobile app or chat templates) that render automation action label for notifications; but those are outside review group files, so we can't comment there per strict focus rules.
Let me double check that within `flow_detail.html.twig`, the summary map also uses the actions list to generate names for newly created automations shown in the flow canvas, and there is a possibility that `create_esocial_s2299_draft` config action gets rendered with an `act.config.label` suffix (e.g., "criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299)"). Look at the migration config - action type with no label? Let me check the migration to see whether the action config contains a `label`, which if present, would add "(...)" after label via generic path `label += ' (' + config.label + ')'` in flow_detail or list_automations? Let's review the migration around lines 331-338 and config/automations/offboarding.yaml around 182.
Actually in `list_automations.html.twig`'s getActionLabel, the generic branch: `else if (type !== 'financial_flow_action') { label += ' (' + config.label + ')'; }` — applies to any type with config.label. In flow_detail's computeAutomationDisplayName, for the `else` branch it appends config detail only for specific types. Let's check the migration to see the config content for create_esocial_s2299_draft action, to determine whether a label might show duplicate, e.g., "Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299) (alguma coisa)".
Let me read migration lines 300-360 and yaml lines 170-200.
Os três arquivos são alterações simples. Vou conferir o conteúdo da action config no YAML e na migration para garantir que o rótulo renderizado não fique duplicado ou estranho (ex.: sufixo de `config.label`).
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 200, "file_path": "config/automations/offboarding.yaml", "start_line": 150}
Result
File: config/automations/offboarding.yaml (Total lines: 481) IS_TRUNCATED: false LINE_RANGE: 150-200 150| icon: "fa-solid fa-envelope" 151| has_config: false 152| config_preset: 153| to: "employee" 154| 155| # 4. Enviar e-mail para responsável do fluxo 156| - id: "send_email_flow_responsible" 157| type: "send_email" 158| title: "Enviar e-mail para responsável do fluxo" 159| icon: "fa-solid fa-user-gear" 160| has_config: false 161| config_preset: 162| to: "flow_responsible" 163| 164| # --------------------------------------------------------- 165| # NOTIFICAÇÕES ADICIONAIS 166| # --------------------------------------------------------- 167| 168| - id: "send_whatsapp" 169| type: "send_whatsapp" 170| title: "Enviar WhatsApp para colaborador" 171| icon: "fa-brands fa-whatsapp" 172| has_config: false 173| 174| movement: 175| - id: "move_to_next_stage" 176| type: "stage_change" 177| title: "Mover para a próxima etapa" 178| icon: "fa-solid fa-arrow-right" 179| has_config: false 180| description: "Move o colaborador para a próxima etapa do offboarding." 181| 182| - id: "create_esocial_s2299_draft" 183| type: "create_esocial_s2299_draft" 184| title: "Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299)" 185| icon: "fa-solid fa-file-lines" 186| has_config: false 187| allowed_triggers: 188| - "employee_enters_stage" 189| blocked_triggers: 190| - "offboarding_completed" 191| - "exit_date" 192| - "deadline_reached" 193| - "all_activities_completed" 194| - "all_activities_completed_plus_days" 195| - "any_activity_completed" 196| - "days_in_stage" 197| - "days_after_offboarding_start" 198| blocked_trigger_message: "Esta ação só pode ser usada com o trigger 'Colaborador entrar nesta etapa'" 199| description: "Cria ou atualiza o rascunho do evento S-2299 com dados do offboarding e notifica o responsável para revisar o desligamento eSocial." 200| config_preset:
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 360, "file_path": "migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php", "start_line": 300}
Result
File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php (Total lines: 478)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 300-360
300| 'description' => 'Etapa de transição de responsabilidades e devolução de equipamentos.',
301| 'orderIndex' => 2,
302| 'automations' => [
303| [
304| 'name' => 'Avançar ao concluir 100% das atividades',
305| 'triggerType' => 'on_all_activities_complete',
306| 'actionType' => 'stage_change',
307| 'actionConfig' => [],
308| 'conditions' => [['type' => 'on_all_activities_complete', 'config' => ['value' => 100], 'orderIndex' => 0]],
309| 'actions' => [['type' => 'stage_change', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0]],
310| 'orderIndex' => 0,
311| ],
312| ],
313| ],
314| [
315| 'name' => 'Etapa 3 - Finalização',
316| 'description' => 'Etapa de finalização com entrevista de desligamento, procedimentos finais e preparação do evento eSocial S-2299.',
317| 'orderIndex' => 3,
318| 'automations' => [
319| [
320| 'name' => 'Criar Processo Seletivo ao concluir offboarding',
321| 'triggerType' => 'on_offboarding_complete',
322| 'actionType' => 'create_processo_seletivo',
323| 'actionConfig' => [],
324| 'conditions' => [['type' => 'on_offboarding_complete', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0]],
325| 'actions' => [['type' => 'create_processo_seletivo', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0]],
326| 'orderIndex' => 0,
327| ],
328| [
329| 'name' => 'Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299) ao entrar na etapa final',
330| 'triggerType' => 'on_enter',
331| 'actionType' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
332| 'actionConfig' => [
333| 'to' => 'flow_responsible',
334| '_default_automation_id' => 'offboarding_esocial_s2299_draft_on_final_stage_enter',
335| ],
336| 'conditions' => [['type' => 'on_enter', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0]],
337| 'actions' => [[
338| 'type' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
339| 'config' => [
340| 'to' => 'flow_responsible',
341| '_default_automation_id' => 'offboarding_esocial_s2299_draft_on_final_stage_enter',
342| ],
343| 'orderIndex' => 0,
344| ]],
345| 'orderIndex' => 1,
346| ],
347| ],
348| ],
349| ];
350|
351| foreach ($stages as $stage) {
352| $stageId = $this->ensureStage($templateId, $productId, $stage);
353| if ($stageId <= 0) {
354| continue;
355| }
356|
357| $this->ensureActivity($stageId);
358|
359| foreach ($stage['automations'] as $automation) {
360| $this->ensureAutomation($stageId, $automation);
Request #13
deepseek-v4-flash
P:37.69K C:806 CR:36.1K CW:0
6309ms
Reasoning
Now, in `flow_detail.html.twig`'s `computeAutomationDisplayName`, an automation with a stored name like "Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299) ao entrar na etapa final" would be non-technical and returned directly (line 3805-3808). So the map entry for `create_esocial_s2299_draft` mainly matters when storedName is empty/technical. OK.
For automations generated by config_preset (without name?), the action map will show proper label. Good.
Now note in flow_detail.html.twig, the action label map is used only when storedName is empty or technical name (financial). Fine.
In list_automations.html.twig, getActionLabel uses the map; config has `has_config: false` so no config.label → no duplication.
Everything looks consistent and correct.
Now, let me consider a potential concern: In the migration, the automation uses `triggerType` 'on_enter', but the YAML config declares `allowed_triggers: ['employee_enters_stage']`. And the label map in list_automations (line 3851) has 'employee_enters_stage' as a condition. That is a cross-file observation but not within the review files except that list_automations displays trigger labels. This is outside the review group (migration not in review group). But is the mismatch worth noting? Not on these template files.
Actually, the business rule states "A automação de criação do rascunho S-2299 só pode ser usada quando o colaborador entra em uma etapa." and the migration config uses 'on_enter', which in flow_detail conditionNames maps to 'registro entrar na etapa'. It's semantically matching "member enters a stage" — although YAML says `employee_enters_stage`. This is not in the review group. Skip.
Let's now confirm the review group files are fully fine. There is nothing problematic to report. But before finishing, the guideline requires reviewing each file individually, cross-file observations within review_files.
Given everything is consistent, maybe one relevant improvement: For files 2 and 3, the change is only the label text. Is there a missing icon for the action type in the list where automations show icons? Search list_automations.html.twig for icon maps referencing action types (e.g., 'actionIcon' maybe derived from config). Not necessarily present.
Let me quickly verify that getActionLabel is invoked with type = action['type'] (not the action id). Check the usage.
Let me search for calls to getActionLabel and renderAutomationSummary in list_automations.
Vou confirmar como `getActionLabel`/`renderAutomationSummary` são chamados em `list_automations.html.twig` para garantir que o tipo passado corresponde à chave adicionada.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig"], "search_text": "getActionLabel\\(|renderAutomationSummary\\(", "use_perl_regexp": true}
Result
File: templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig
Match lines: 6
437|function getActionLabel(type, config = {}) {
644|function renderAutomationSummary(automation) {
664| actionsText = getActionLabel(action.type, action.config).toLowerCase();
667| actionsText = getActionLabel(firstAction.type, firstAction.config).toLowerCase()
725| const automationSummary = renderAutomationSummary(automationData);
809| const displayName = renderAutomationSummary(automationData);
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig"], "search_text": "actionNames\\[|actionNames\\.", "use_perl_regexp": true}
Result
File: templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig Match lines: 1 4210| var actLabel = actionNames[act.type] || formatTypeName(act.type);
Request #14
deepseek-v4-flash
P:38.67K C:1.11K CR:38.4K CW:0
7803ms
Reasoning
All right. In list_automations, `getActionLabel(action.type, action.config)` is used. The new key maps correctly.
Now, one important thing to verify is that `renderAutomationSummary` in list_automations might render actions in lowercase. The label is `'Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299)'`. Then `.toLowerCase()` → "criar rascunho do desligamento esocial (s-2299)". That would show the acronym eSocial and S-2299 lowercased. Well, other entries in flow_detail labels are already lowercase. In list_automations, getConditionLabel/formatTypeName produce e.g., "Enviar notificação", then lowercased in summary. That's a pre-existing pattern for all. No big deal.
Wait — "eSocial" lowercased to "esocial" could be considered a display glitch, but pre-existing pattern applies to the whole summary function; the summary text is all lowercase. Not worth a comment.
So, overall this review group has no functional issues to flag.
Hold on — check the summary label: In list_automations getActionLabel default is used in a different context too? Line 725/809 calls renderAutomationSummary which lowercases. Fine.
Let me make sure there is no issue in the first file regarding Twig syntax - the diff shows `value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab %}{{ prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab }}{% endif %}">` — valid.
Given the changes are minimal, correct, and consistent with surrounding patterns, there's nothing to flag. However, let me reconsider the possibility that we should check whether `prevEvts.termino` is not the right property to gate `nrProcTrab` value. Wait: could the S-2299 desligamento draft now created by the automation contain `nrProcTrab`, and the desired prefill for a normal employee should come from the S-2299 event (`prevEvts.desligamento`)? Under the new workflow, the automation creates `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` for normal employee offboarding. That event is a draft with eSocial fields. If the tab "Motivo do Desligamento" is supposed to prefill/allow review of the S-2299 draft, then reading the value only from `prevEvts.termino` (S-2399) means the S-2299 draft's `nrProcTrab` won't show. But the section may belong to a guide for S-2399 events only (esocial_termino templates). Given directory "member_guides_esocial_termino", these templates guide the user through data related to termino/desligamento events, and the tab IDs are prefixed with `termino-`. So the fix is consistent.
But hold on, we need to think about it from the actual context of the bug: before fix, the code was `prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab`. After fix, `prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab`. What was the actual bug scenario? It says "Corrigido erro ao abrir a aba de desligamento quando prevEvts.termino ainda não existe." That implies desligamento exists (thus prior condition true) but termino doesn't → crash at `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab`. Since this is the "motivo_desligamento" section, the fields (mtvDesligTsv, dtTerm, nrProcTrab) match the S-2399 termino entity. For CLT employees there's no TSV termino so termino is null. The guard fixes crash.
Given the entity `EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino` should have `nrProcTrab` field. Let me quickly verify that the EsocialS2399 entity has nrProcTrab, dtTerm, mtvDesligTsv. If nrProcTrab is only on S2299... then the whole prefill never worked anyway. Let me check quickly.
Vou verificar rapidamente se a entidade do evento término (S-2399) possui os campos usados no template (`mtvDesligTsv`, `dtTerm`, `nrProcTrab`), para garantir que o guard corrigido aponta para a entidade certa.
Tool Calls (2)
file_find
Show Details
Arguments
{"query_name": "EsocialS2399"}
Result
src/Entity/EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino.php src/Repository/EsocialS2399EvtTsvTerminoRepository.php
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Entity/EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino.php"], "search_text": "nrProcTrab|dtTerm|mtvDesligTsv", "use_perl_regexp": true}
Result
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino.php Match lines: 15 16| private $dtTerm; 21| private $mtvDesligTsv; 41| private $nrProcTrab; 76| public function getDtTerm(): ?\DateTimeInterface 78| return $this->dtTerm; 81| public function setDtTerm(?\DateTimeInterface $dtTerm): self 83| $this->dtTerm = $dtTerm; 88| public function getMtvDesligTsv(): ?string 90| return $this->mtvDesligTsv; 93| public function setMtvDesligTsv(?string $mtvDesligTsv): self 95| $this->mtvDesligTsv = $mtvDesligTsv; 136| public function getNrProcTrab(): ?string 138| return $this->nrProcTrab; 141| public function setNrProcTrab(?string $nrProcTrab): self 143| $this->nrProcTrab = $nrProcTrab;
Request #15
deepseek-v4-flash
P:40.09K C:949 CR:39.68K CW:0
7226ms
Reasoning
Confirmed: the `EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino` entity (the "termino" key in `prevEvts`) has `dtTerm`, `mtvDesligTsv`, and `nrProcTrab`. The fix aligns with the correct entity.
Summary of the review:
1. `motivo_desligamento.html.twig`: guard fix is correct and consistent with the rest of the template and sibling templates. The entity for the "termino" key holds those fields. No issue.
2. `list_automations.html.twig`: adds the label for action `create_esocial_s2299_draft`; consistent with config id/type and matches the map key usage. No issue.
3. `flow_detail.html.twig`: same, consistent.
No issues to report. I'll call task_done.
Actually, wait. Let me double check the `mtvDesligTsv` usage in the template. This template is about "Motivo do Desligamento" but uses S-2399 (término TSV). Given the overall PR is about S-2299 desligamento, the confusion between S-2299 and S-2399 is a pre-existing structural situation. Not in scope.
One more thing: Should I double check that there aren't other files within review_files? The list has exactly three. Each has been reviewed.
Per the instructions, if no code issues are identified, call task_done.
Let me be thorough though - could there be a reason to flag that files 2 and 3 maps are in separate template blocks, i.e., potential maintainability: label strings duplicated in two templates. That's the pre-existing pattern (each template keeps its own labels map). Not a new problem worth flagging.
I'll finish with task_done.
Análise concluída para os três arquivos do grupo de revisão:
**1. `templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig`**
A correção troca a guarda de `prevEvts.desligamento` por `prevEvts.termino` antes de acessar `nrProcTrab`. Confirmei que:
- `prevEvts.termino` corresponde ao evento `EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino`, entidade que de fato possui `nrProcTrab` (além de `dtTerm` e `mtvDesligTsv`);
- a nova guarda é idêntica ao padrão já usado em todo o restante do template (linhas 14–81) e nos templates irmãos (`pensao_alimenticia`, `quarentena_remunerada`, `mudanca_cpf`);
- evita o acesso a propriedade sobre objeto nulo quando não existe evento anterior, que é exatamente o cenário descrito no escopo da PR. Correção correta, dentro do escopo.
**2. `templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig`**
A chave `create_esocial_s2299_draft` foi adicionada ao mapa de rótulos de `getActionLabel`. Confirmei que:
- o tipo/id declarado no `config/automations/offboarding.yaml` e na migration é exatamente `create_esocial_s2299_draft`;
- `getActionLabel(action.type, action.config)` é chamado com `type` vindo das actions, e a action config não tem `label`, então não há duplicação de texto no resumo;
- existe fallback (`formatTypeName`) caso a chave não exista, mas a adição mantém a consistência. Sem problema.
**3. `templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig`**
Mesma adição no mapa `actionNames` usado por `computeAutomationDisplayName`, com fallback existente; o texto em minúsculas é consistente com os demais rótulos do mapa. Sem problema.
Não foram identificados problemas de regressão, segurança, XSS, escopo ou inconsistência de contrato nas alterações em análise. As mudanças são mínimas, corretas e consistentes com os padrões existentes.
Tool Calls (1)
task_done
Show Details
Arguments
{"state": "DONE"}
tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php 11 requests
main_task
Request #1
deepseek-v4-flash
P:7.69K C:361 CR:2.69K CW:0
2489ms
Reasoning
Let me analyze the code changes in the review file.
The review file is `tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php`. The changes are:
1. Renaming a test method from `testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoMedicoExigeCaracterizar` to `testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoMedicoComSuspeitaExigeCaracterizar`.
2. Adding `'descaracter_suspect' => '1',` to test data.
I need to understand the context of this test to determine whether these changes are valid. Let me read the test file around that area and possibly the validator source.
The user task says to review regressions, security, isolation, integrity, migrations, tests, and problems introduced by the diff. But the review group only includes this one test file.
Let me read the relevant sections of the test file to understand the context. Let me read lines around 846-900.
Also, I should look at the SsmaEventValidator to understand what `descaracter_suspect` does.
Let me gather context.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php", "start_line": 800, "end_line": 960}
Result
File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php (Total lines: 990)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 800-960
800| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
801| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
802| 'location' => 'Linha 2',
803| 'description' => 'Toast da imagem — etapa 2 incompleta',
804| 'aprofundamento_complete' => true,
805| 'details' => [
806| 'activity' => 'Operação de corte',
807| 'approach' => 'CORRECAO_OPERACIONAL',
808| 'person_id' => '101',
809| 'person_type' => 'COLABORADOR',
810| 'had_injury' => true,
811| ],
812| ]);
813|
814| $joined = implode("\n", $errors);
815|
816| // Não pode mais aparecer o texto técnico do print antigo.
817| self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.injury_type:', $joined);
818| self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.injury_classification:', $joined);
819| self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.descaracterizado:', $joined);
820| self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.potential_consequence:', $joined);
821| self::assertStringNotContainsString('consequence: obrigatório', $joined);
822|
823| self::assertTrue(
824| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Consequência real é obrigatória')),
825| "Faltou mensagem de consequência real. Erros:\n{$joined}"
826| );
827| self::assertTrue(
828| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Consequência potencial é obrigatória')),
829| "Faltou mensagem de consequência potencial. Erros:\n{$joined}"
830| );
831| self::assertTrue(
832| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Consequência potencial / Gravidade é obrigatória')),
833| "Faltou mensagem de gravidade. Erros:\n{$joined}"
834| );
835| self::assertTrue(
836| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Tipo de lesão é obrigatório quando há lesão')),
837| "Faltou mensagem humana de tipo de lesão. Erros:\n{$joined}"
838| );
839| self::assertTrue(
840| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Classificação da lesão é obrigatória quando há lesão')),
841| "Faltou mensagem humana de classificação. Erros:\n{$joined}"
842| );
843| self::assertFalse(
844| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'caracterizado como acidente')),
845| "Caracterizar não deve ser exigido na criação. Erros:\n{$joined}"
846| );
847| }
848|
849| public function testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoMedicoComSuspeitaExigeCaracterizar(): void
850| {
851| $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
852|
853| $errors = $validator->validate([
854| 'type' => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_PESSOAL,
855| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
856| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
857| 'location' => 'Linha 2',
858| 'description' => 'Médico finalizando aprofundamento',
859| 'aprofundamento_complete' => true,
860| 'aprofundamento_only' => true,
861| 'nature' => 'CORTE',
862| 'agent' => 'FERRAMENTA',
863| 'consequence' => 'LESAO_LEVE',
864| 'impacts' => ['PESSOA'],
865| 'details' => [
866| 'activity' => 'Operação de corte',
867| 'approach' => 'TREINAMENTO',
868| 'strategic_nature' => 'SEGURANCA',
869| 'barrier_type' => 'FISICA',
870| 'potential_consequence' => 'LESAO_MODERADA',
871| 'potential_severity' => 'MODERADO',
872| 'person_id' => '101',
873| 'person_type' => 'COLABORADOR',
874| 'had_injury' => true,
875| 'injury_type' => 'CORTE',
876| 'injury_severity' => 'LEVE',
877| 'injury_classification' => 'FAC',
878| 'descaracter_suspect' => '1',
879| 'body_parts' => [
880| ['region' => 'MAO', 'side' => 'DIREITA', 'injury_type' => 'CORTE'],
881| ],
882| ],
883| ]);
884|
885| self::assertTrue(
886| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'caracterizado como acidente')),
887| 'Médico deve informar se foi caracterizado. Erros: ' . implode(' | ', $errors)
888| );
889| }
890|
891| public function testPayloadComInjuryTypePreenchidoDisparaValidacaoAprofundamento(): void
892| {
893| $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
894|
895| $errors = $validator->validate([
896| 'type' => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_PESSOAL,
897| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
898| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
899| 'location' => 'Linha 2',
900| 'description' => 'Enviou injury_type sem completar aprofundamento',
901| 'details' => [
902| 'activity' => 'Operação',
903| 'approach' => 'CORRECAO_OPERACIONAL',
904| 'person_id' => '101',
905| 'person_type' => 'COLABORADOR',
906| 'injury_type' => 'CORTE',
907| 'had_injury' => true,
908| ],
909| ]);
910|
911| self::assertNotEmpty($errors);
912| $joined = implode(' | ', $errors);
913| self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.injury_type:', $joined);
914| self::assertTrue(
915| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Consequência real')),
916| 'Com injury_type preenchido deve exigir aprofundamento. Erros: ' . $joined
917| );
918| }
919|
920| public function testAcidentePessoalEtapa1SemPessoaRetornaMensagemHumana(): void
921| {
922| $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
923|
924| $errors = $validator->validate([
925| 'type' => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_PESSOAL,
926| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
927| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
928| 'location' => 'Linha 2',
929| 'description' => 'Sem pessoa',
930| 'details' => [
931| 'activity' => 'Operação',
932| 'approach' => 'CORRECAO_OPERACIONAL',
933| ],
934| ]);
935|
936| self::assertNotEmpty($errors);
937| $joined = implode(' | ', $errors);
938| self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.person_id', $joined);
939| self::assertTrue(
940| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Pessoa envolvida é obrigatória')),
941| 'Esperava mensagem humana de pessoa. Erros: ' . $joined
942| );
943| }
944|
945| public function testAcidentePessoalEtapa1ComPessoaEnvolvidaNaoExigeAprofundamento(): void
946| {
947| $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
948|
949| $errors = $validator->validate([
950| 'type' => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_PESSOAL,
951| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
952| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
953| 'location' => 'Linha 2',
954| 'description' => 'Com pessoa na etapa 1',
955| 'details' => [
956| 'activity' => 'Operação',
957| 'approach' => 'CORRECAO_OPERACIONAL',
958| 'people_ids' => '101,102',
959| 'person_id' => '101',
960| 'person_type' => 'COLABORADOR',
file_find
Show Details
Arguments
{"query_name": "SsmaEventValidator.php"}
Result
src/Service/Ssma/SsmaEventValidator.php
Request #2
deepseek-v4-flash
P:10.32K C:108 CR:7.94K CW:0
1317ms
Reasoning
Let me look at the validator to understand the rule about `descaracter_suspect` and caracterizado.
Tool Calls (2)
file_find
Show Details
Arguments
{"query_name": "SsmaEventValidator"}
Result
src/Service/Ssma/SsmaEventValidator.php tests/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "descaracter_suspect"}
Result
File: GUIA_MERGE_TAB_OCCURRENCES.md
Match lines: 2
232| data-descaracter-suspect="{{ occ.descaracter_suspect|default(0) }}"
252| data-descaracter-suspect="{{ occ.descaracter_suspect|default(0) }}"
File: RESUMO_MAURICIO_MARCOS.md
Match lines: 1
136| data-descaracter-suspect="{{ occ.descaracter_suspect|default(0) }}"
File: docs/ssma/CORRECOES-FECHAMENTO-FIGMA-PENDENTES.md
Match lines: 1
81|| Há suspeita de descaracterização | `suspeita_sim` | `descaracter_suspect = 1` |
File: docs/ssma/ocorrencia-06-tudo-na-caixinha-descaracter.md
Match lines: 1
27|| Persistência ocorrência | `#ev_descaracter_suspect` + `#ev_descaracterizado` (hiddens sincronizados) |
File: docs/ssma/ocorrencia-07-suspeita-descaracterizacao-ui.md
Match lines: 1
20|| Suspeita marcada | `descaracter_suspect` | `1` |
File: docs/ssma/ocorrencia-08-filtro-aprofundamento-descaracter.md
Match lines: 1
14|| Há suspeita de descaracterização | `suspeita_sim` | `descaracter_suspect = 1` |
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 6
14187| 'descaracter_suspect' => !empty($details['descaracter_suspect']) ? 1 : 0,
26687| 'injured_person_details', 'descaracter_suspect', 'descaracterizado', 'descaracter_comment', 'witness_ids',
26783| foreach (['descaracter_suspect', 'descaracterizado', 'descaracter_comment'] as $descKey) {
26795| if (isset($details['descaracter_suspect'])) {
26796| $details['descaracter_suspect'] = !empty($details['descaracter_suspect']) && $details['descaracter_suspect'] !== '0' ? 1 : 0;
27031| 'descaracter_suspect',
File: src/Service/Ssma/Export/SsmaOccurrenceExportRowMapper.php
Match lines: 1
156| 'ap_descaracter_suspect' => SsmaOccurrenceExportLabels::boolLabel($d['descaracter_suspect'] ?? null),
File: src/Service/Ssma/Export/SsmaOccurrenceExportSchema.php
Match lines: 1
76| 'ap_descaracter_suspect' => 'Suspeita de descaracterização?',
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php
Match lines: 2
648| $suspect = ($payload['descaracter_suspect'] ?? '0') === '1';
2031| $payload['descaracter_suspect'] = !empty($details['descaracter_suspect']) ? '1' : '0';
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaEventService.php
Match lines: 5
161| 'descaracter_suspect', 'descaracterizado', 'descaracter_comment',
186| if (!empty($card['descaracter_suspect'])) {
187| $details['descaracter_suspect'] = 1;
188| } elseif (array_key_exists('descaracter_suspect', $card)) {
189| $details['descaracter_suspect'] = 0;
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaEventValidator.php
Match lines: 1
719| $hasSuspect = !empty($d['descaracter_suspect']) && $d['descaracter_suspect'] !== '0';
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig
Match lines: 11
291| <input class="form-check-input" type="checkbox" id="ev_descaracter_suspect" name="ev_descaracter_suspect" value="1">
292| <label class="form-check-label" for="ev_descaracter_suspect">Há suspeita de descaracterização do acidente?</label>
2197| descaracter_suspect: evIsDescaracterSuspectChecked() ? 1 : 0,
2905| var el = document.getElementById('ev_descaracter_suspect');
5728| var suspectChk = document.getElementById('ev_descaracter_suspect');
5746| var globalChk = document.getElementById('ev_descaracter_suspect');
6474| var suspectRaw = det.descaracter_suspect != null ? det.descaracter_suspect : data.descaracter_suspect;
6476| evSetChk('ev_descaracter_suspect', suspectOn);
7092| var suspectEl = document.getElementById('ev_descaracter_suspect');
7108| payload.descaracter_suspect = evIsDescaracterSuspectChecked() ? 1 : 0;
7125| suspectEl.checked = !!payload.descaracter_suspect;
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/tabs/_tab_occurrences.html.twig
Match lines: 3
455| data-descaracter-suspect="{{ occ.descaracter_suspect|default(0) }}"
1636| ' data-descaracter-suspect="' + escapeHtml(String(occurrenceData.descaracter_suspect ? 1 : 0)) + '"' +
1714| rowNode.setAttribute('data-descaracter-suspect', occurrenceData.descaracter_suspect ? '1' : '0');
File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php
Match lines: 1
878| 'descaracter_suspect' => '1',
Request #3
deepseek-v4-flash
P:11.9K C:114 CR:10.37K CW:0
1598ms
Reasoning
Let me look at the validator code around line 719 to understand the rule requiring "caracterizado como acidente".
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Service/Ssma/SsmaEventValidator.php", "start_line": 680, "end_line": 780}
Result
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaEventValidator.php (Total lines: 887)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 680-780
680| }
681| if ($workLeave === 'TOTAL' && $injClass !== '' && !\in_array($injClass, ['LTI', 'LTI_FATALIDADE', 'LTI_INCAPACITANTE', 'FAT'], true)) {
682| $errors[] = 'Com afastamento total, a classificação deve ser FAT ou LTI — Afastamento.';
683| }
684| if ($workLeave === 'NAO' && $injClass !== '' && !\in_array($injClass, ['FAC', 'MTC', 'RWC'], true)) {
685| $errors[] = 'Sem afastamento, use apenas FAC, MTC ou RWC.';
686| }
687|
688| if ($hadInjury) {
689| if (isset($d['body_location_detail']) && $d['body_location_detail'] !== null && $d['body_location_detail'] !== '') {
690| if (!\is_string($d['body_location_detail'])) {
691| $errors[] = 'Detalhe da localização no corpo deve ser texto.';
692| } elseif (mb_strlen((string) $d['body_location_detail']) > 2000) {
693| $errors[] = 'Detalhe da localização no corpo: no máximo 2000 caracteres.';
694| }
695| }
696| /* hand_finger / foot_toe no nível details: legado (MAO/PE sem lado); preferir por body_parts[]. */
697| $allowedHandFlat = ['POLEGAR', 'INDICADOR', 'MEDIO', 'ANULAR', 'MINIMO'];
698| $allowedFootFlat = ['HALUX', 'SEGUNDO_DEDO', 'TERCEIRO_DEDO', 'QUARTO_DEDO', 'MINIMO_PE'];
699| if (!empty($d['hand_finger'])) {
700| foreach (array_filter(array_map('trim', explode(',', (string) $d['hand_finger']))) as $v) {
701| if (!\in_array($v, $allowedHandFlat, true)) {
702| $errors[] = 'Dedo da mão inválido: ' . $v;
703| }
704| }
705| }
706| if (!empty($d['foot_toe'])) {
707| foreach (array_filter(array_map('trim', explode(',', (string) $d['foot_toe']))) as $v) {
708| if (!\in_array($v, $allowedFootFlat, true)) {
709| $errors[] = 'Dedo do pé inválido: ' . $v;
710| }
711| }
712| }
713| }
714|
715| $descVal = array_key_exists('descaracterizado', $d) ? (string) $d['descaracterizado'] : '';
716| // Caracterizar é do médico no aprofundamento dedicado — não na criação.
717| // Sim/Não + comentário só são obrigatórios quando há suspeita de descaracterização marcada.
718| if (!empty($data['aprofundamento_only'])) {
719| $hasSuspect = !empty($d['descaracter_suspect']) && $d['descaracter_suspect'] !== '0';
720| if ($hasSuspect) {
721| if (!\in_array($descVal, ['0', '1'], true)) {
722| $errors[] = 'Informe se o evento é caracterizado como acidente (Sim/Não).';
723| } else {
724| $comment = trim((string) ($d['descaracter_comment'] ?? ''));
725| if ($comment === '') {
726| $errors[] = 'Comentário de caracterização do acidente é obrigatório.';
727| }
728| }
729| }
730| }
731|
732| return $errors;
733| }
734|
735| private function validateAcidenteMaterial(array $d): array
736| {
737| $errors = [];
738|
739| if (empty($d['potential_severity']) || !PotentialSeverityEnum::isValid($d['potential_severity'])) {
740| $errors[] = 'Consequência potencial / Gravidade é obrigatória. Selecione uma opção válida.';
741| }
742|
743| if (empty($d['asset_type'])) {
744| $errors[] = 'Tipo de ativo é obrigatório para Acidente Material.';
745| }
746| if (!isset($d['operational_impact'])) {
747| $errors[] = 'Impacto operacional é obrigatório.';
748| }
749| // Barreira que falhou removida do formulário AM (Brenda) — legado opcional.
750| if (!empty($d['failed_barrier']) && !FailedBarrierEnum::isValid((string) $d['failed_barrier'])) {
751| $errors[] = 'Barreira que falhou: valor inválido.';
752| }
753| if (empty($d['barrier_type']) || !BarrierTypeEnum::isValid((string) $d['barrier_type'])) {
754| $errors[] = 'Tipo de barreira é obrigatório. Selecione uma opção válida.';
755| }
756|
757| return $errors;
758| }
759|
760| private function validateAcidenteAmbiental(array $d): array
761| {
762| $errors = [];
763|
764| if (empty($d['potential_severity']) || !PotentialSeverityEnum::isValid($d['potential_severity'])) {
765| $errors[] = 'Consequência potencial / Gravidade é obrigatória. Selecione uma opção válida.';
766| }
767|
768| if (empty($d['environmental_medium']) || !EnvironmentalMediumEnum::isValid((string) $d['environmental_medium'])) {
769| $errors[] = 'Meio ambiental é obrigatório. Selecione uma opção válida.';
770| }
771| // Formulário novo envia PollutantTypeEnum. Texto livre já gravado (legado) também
772| // passa, para não bloquear re-save de eventos antigos.
773| $pollutant = trim((string) ($d['pollutant_type'] ?? ''));
774| if ($pollutant === '') {
775| $errors[] = 'Tipo de poluente é obrigatório. Selecione uma opção válida.';
776| }
777| if (!isset($d['containment_done'])) {
778| $errors[] = 'Informe se houve contenção.';
779| }
780| // external_impact: removido do cadastro (Parte 1 C7) — opcional/legado, não bloqueia save.
Request #4
deepseek-v4-flash
P:13.63K C:2.09K CR:11.9K CW:0
14019ms
Reasoning
Now I understand the validation rule. In the validator (line 718-730):
```php
if (!empty($data['aprofundamento_only'])) {
$hasSuspect = !empty($d['descaracter_suspect']) && $d['descaracter_suspect'] !== '0';
if ($hasSuspect) {
if (!\in_array($descVal, ['0', '1'], true)) {
$errors[] = 'Informe se o evento é caracterizado como acidente (Sim/Não).';
} else {
$comment = trim((string) ($d['descaracter_comment'] ?? ''));
if ($comment === '') {
$errors[] = 'Comentário de caracterização do acidente é obrigatório.';
}
}
}
}
```
The test was renamed from `testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoMedicoExigeCaracterizar` to `testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoMedicoComSuspeitaExigeCaracterizar`, and adds `'descaracter_suspect' => '1'`.
Before the change, without `descaracter_suspect` set, `$hasSuspect` would be false, so no error would be generated - the test asserting the error should be present would fail. So the test change makes the test meaningful: with `descaracter_suspect=1`, the rule "Informe se o evento é caracterizado como acidente (Sim/Não)." will fire because `descaracterizado` isn't set, resulting in an error. Wait, in this test, `descaracterizado` is not provided so `$descVal = ''`, which is not in ['0','1'], so the error "Informe se o evento é caracterizado..." is added. But then, wait, the test asserts the error `str_contains($e, 'caracterizado como acidente')`. The error message is 'Informe se o evento é caracterizado como acidente (Sim/Não).' which contains "caracterizado como acidente". Good.
Wait — however, the comment requirement: If `descaracterizado` is not set (''), it triggers the first error, and doesn't reach the comment check. So test passes.
But note: the test itself only marks suspect but never actually sets `descaracterizado`. So the test asserts that when there is suspicion but characterization isn't informed, error must be raised. That makes sense with the code.
This test change is consistent with the code in the validator at line 718-730. The rename is aligned with the semantics - caracterizar is only required when there's suspicion (`descaracter_suspect = 1`).
Wait, but is this test change part of the current PR scope? The PR's review group contains only this test file change. But this test file change appears to be unrelated to the offboarding feature. Hmm, but it might be an isolated fix. Let's check whether the diff change relates to the offboarding PR. It may have been committed accidentally in the branch from a merge? But our task is just to review the file diff given.
Let me consider potential issues with the test change:
1. Test name now properly reflects the precondition (`descaracter_suspect = 1`). Good.
2. Adding `descaracter_suspect = '1'` makes the test actually exercise the intended path. Before the change, was the test failing? Let me check the git diff: the test previously was `testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoMedicoExigeCaracterizar` and didn't have `descaracter_suspect`. The rule at line 718-730 says caracterizar only required when suspect is marked. So the old test would fail (it asserted the error exists but `$hasSuspect` false means no error). So this test change fixes a previously failing test or adapts to the rule. But wait — was the rule changed elsewhere in the codebase? The rule code is not in the review files; only test file change in the review group. But there might have been a validator change in the broader PR (not listed here). Actually the review_files contains only the test file. But the validator file at line 715-730 contains comments "Caracterizar é do médico no aprofundamento dedicado — não na criação. Sim/Não + comentário só são obrigatórios quando há suspeita de descaracterização marcada." That rule with the suspect gating might have been recently changed. Hmm.
Let's verify: is there a possibility that the test should still pass without descaracter_suspect? Looking at the other test `testAcidentePessoal...`? Let me check if there's a prior test at 700-847 area where caracterizar is NOT required on creation. Yes at lines 843-846: `self::assertFalse(... str_contains 'caracterizado como acidente')` "Caracterizar não deve ser exigido na criação."
Now, the new test modified in diff matches the current validator rule. So no issue there.
Potential issue: the test only adds `descaracter_suspect` but the required comment message when `descaracterizado` is chosen is not tested here. But that's not a bug in the test change itself.
Wait — there may be a subtle bug: with `descaracter_suspect=1`, the error path is entered. The assertion just checks the message 'caracterizado como acidente' exists. Given `descaracterizado` is not present, the message would be 'Informe se o evento é caracterizado como acidente (Sim/Não).' Good.
But there's another subtlety: The test data uses `'descaracter_suspect' => '1'` but does not include `descaracterizado` or `descaracter_comment`. That's fine for this error path.
Now, the test being renamed... is there also another version of the test in `tests/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php`? There are two files: `tests/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php` and `tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php`. Since there's a duplicate test file path. It doesn't matter for this review.
Is there a possibility that the test change is a test-only change unrelated to this PR? We shouldn't comment on scope unless clearly problematic. Since the validator code already implements the rule, the test aligns. This seems like a good change.
Now let's check: Was this test previously passing or failing? If this test previously passed without `descaracter_suspect`, then the validator code previously didn't gate on suspect and required caracterizar unconditionally in aprofundamento. That would mean the test change accompanies a behavior change in the validator (which is elsewhere, not in review group, but the PR description mentions merging new_production into branch; also "Corrigido erro ao abrir aba..." etc.). The change aligns test with current validator logic. So it's a legit fix.
Is there anything wrong about this change? Let's examine closely: The validation error message that the test checks is 'caracterizado como acidente'. The actual message in code (line 722) is 'Informe se o evento é caracterizado como acidente (Sim/Não).'. Contains substring. Good.
Now, check if test asserts only one specific error. It only checks for the presence of caracterizado message. Fine.
Let me consider whether the change to the test introduced any potential for the test to still be misleading: The test name now says "ComSuspeitaExigeCaracterizar" - matches.
One consideration: in the rule at line 719: `$hasSuspect = !empty($d['descaracter_suspect']) && $d['descaracter_suspect'] !== '0';` So '1' passes. Good.
Now is there any missing test for the scenario without suspicion where caracterizar is NOT required (in aprofundamento)? That could be a "test coverage" gap but likely the earlier test at lines 843-846 covers the creation context. Actually the 843-846 test asserts caracterizar is not required on creation (no aprofundamento). Hmm, is there an aprofundamento scenario without suspicion that should not require caracterizar? Not sure. We could check the other file `tests/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php` to see whether other tests cover this. But that might be out of scope; the diff is minimal and correct.
Let me look at the git history for the validator rule to confirm whether the test change matches a recent production-code change. Let me read the validator around lines 715-733 again — the comment at lines 716-717 says "Caracterizar é do médico no aprofundamento dedicado — não na criação." That rule with the suspect gating could be from the PR that also changed the rule. Hmm.
Let me check git blame/diff on the validator? We can't easily access git. But we can search for related tests in tests/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php to see if a similar test exists there (which may now be inconsistent).
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "AprofundamentoMedicoExigeCaracterizar|aprofundamento_only", "file_patterns": ["tests/"]}
Result
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "caracterizado como acidente", "file_patterns": ["tests/"]}
Result
File: tests/Ssma/ValidateLocalFixesTest.php Match lines: 2 153| 'descaracter_comment' => 'Caracterizado como acidente de trabalho conforme análise técnica.', 192| 'descaracter_comment' => 'Caracterizado como acidente de trabalho conforme análise técnica.', File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php Match lines: 3 454| || str_contains($e, 'caracterizado como acidente') 844| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'caracterizado como acidente')), 886| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'caracterizado como acidente')),
Request #5
deepseek-v4-flash
P:15.93K C:147 CR:15.62K CW:0
1761ms
Reasoning
Let me look at tests around line 440-460 and also how `descaracterizado` interacts with the requirement in aprofundamento. And check `ValidateLocalFixesTest` at lines 130-200 to understand whether the tests there cover similar flows.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php", "start_line": 380, "end_line": 560}
Result
File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php (Total lines: 990)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 380-560
380| 'type' => EventTypeEnum::ROS,
381| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
382| 'location' => 'Pátio',
383| 'description' => 'Desvio.',
384| 'details' => [
385| 'activity' => 'Ronda',
386| 'deviation_type' => 'COMPORTAMENTO',
387| 'potential_severity' => 'LEVE',
388| 'immediate_risk' => false,
389| 'barrier_type' => 'FISICA',
390| 'nature' => 'OPERACIONAL',
391| 'improvement_suggestions' => 'Sugestão.',
392| ],
393| ]);
394|
395| self::assertNotEmpty($errors);
396| $match = array_values(array_filter(
397| $errors,
398| static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Envolvimento é obrigatório')
399| ));
400| self::assertNotEmpty($match, 'Esperava mensagem de Envolvimento. Erros: ' . implode(' | ', $errors));
401| self::assertStringNotContainsString('Categoria', $match[0]);
402| }
403|
404| public function testAcidentePessoalEtapa1SemAprofundamentoPassaValidacao(): void
405| {
406| $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
407|
408| $errors = $validator->validate([
409| 'type' => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_PESSOAL,
410| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
411| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
412| 'location' => 'Linha 2',
413| 'description' => 'Teste etapa 1',
414| 'details' => [
415| 'activity' => 'Operação de corte',
416| 'approach' => 'CORRECAO_OPERACIONAL', // default do formulário na 1ª etapa
417| 'person_id' => '101',
418| 'person_type' => 'COLABORADOR',
419| ],
420| ]);
421|
422| self::assertSame([], $errors, 'Etapa 1 não deve exigir campos do Aprofundamento. Erros: ' . implode(' | ', $errors));
423| }
424|
425| public function testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoCompleteExigeCamposTecnicosComMensagemHumana(): void
426| {
427| $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
428|
429| $errors = $validator->validate([
430| 'type' => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_PESSOAL,
431| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
432| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
433| 'location' => 'Linha 2',
434| 'description' => 'Teste etapa 2',
435| 'aprofundamento_complete' => true,
436| 'details' => [
437| 'activity' => 'Operação de corte',
438| 'approach' => 'CORRECAO_OPERACIONAL',
439| 'person_id' => '101',
440| 'person_type' => 'COLABORADOR',
441| 'had_injury' => true,
442| ],
443| ]);
444|
445| self::assertNotEmpty($errors);
446| $joined = implode(' | ', $errors);
447| self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.injury_type', $joined);
448| self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.descaracterizado', $joined);
449| self::assertTrue(
450| (bool) array_filter(
451| $errors,
452| static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Consequência real')
453| || str_contains($e, 'Tipo de lesão')
454| || str_contains($e, 'caracterizado como acidente')
455| ),
456| 'Esperava mensagens humanas do Aprofundamento. Erros: ' . $joined
457| );
458| }
459|
460| public function testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoPendingAindaExigeCampos(): void
461| {
462| $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
463|
464| $errors = $validator->aprofundamentoPendingErrors([
465| 'type' => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_PESSOAL,
466| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
467| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
468| 'location' => 'Linha 2',
469| 'description' => 'Pendente',
470| 'details' => [
471| 'activity' => 'Operação',
472| 'person_id' => '101',
473| 'person_type' => 'COLABORADOR',
474| ],
475| ]);
476|
477| self::assertNotEmpty($errors);
478| }
479|
480| public function testAcidentePessoalEtapa1ComCamposTecnicosVaziosAindaPassa(): void
481| {
482| $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
483|
484| // Simula payload do front na 1ª etapa com strings vazias (não dispara aprofundamento).
485| $errors = $validator->validate([
486| 'type' => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_PESSOAL,
487| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
488| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
489| 'location' => 'Linha 2',
490| 'description' => 'Cadastro etapa 1 Palloma',
491| 'consequence' => '',
492| 'details' => [
493| 'activity' => 'Operação de corte',
494| 'approach' => 'CORRECAO_OPERACIONAL',
495| 'person_id' => '101',
496| 'person_type' => 'COLABORADOR',
497| 'potential_consequence' => '',
498| 'potential_severity' => '',
499| 'injury_type' => '',
500| 'injury_classification' => '',
501| 'descaracterizado' => '',
502| ],
503| ]);
504|
505| self::assertSame([], $errors, 'Campos técnicos vazios na etapa 1 não devem bloquear. Erros: ' . implode(' | ', $errors));
506| }
507|
508| public function testAcidenteMaterialEtapa1SemAprofundamentoPassaValidacao(): void
509| {
510| $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
511|
512| $errors = $validator->validate([
513| 'type' => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_MATERIAL,
514| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
515| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
516| 'location' => 'Pátio',
517| 'description' => 'Dano em equipamento',
518| 'details' => [
519| 'activity' => 'Manutenção',
520| 'approach' => 'CORRECAO_OPERACIONAL',
521| ],
522| ]);
523|
524| self::assertSame([], $errors, 'AM etapa 1 não deve exigir aprofundamento. Erros: ' . implode(' | ', $errors));
525| }
526|
527| public function testAcidenteAmbientalEtapa1SemAprofundamentoPassaValidacao(): void
528| {
529| $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
530|
531| $errors = $validator->validate([
532| 'type' => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_AMBIENTAL,
533| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
534| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
535| 'location' => 'Área externa',
536| 'description' => 'Vazamento contido',
537| 'details' => [
538| 'activity' => 'Transferência',
539| 'approach' => 'CORRECAO_OPERACIONAL',
540| ],
541| ]);
542|
543| self::assertSame([], $errors, 'AA etapa 1 não deve exigir aprofundamento. Erros: ' . implode(' | ', $errors));
544| }
545|
546| public function testAcidenteAmbientalAprofundamentoBrendaSemDimensaoNemFailedBarrier(): void
547| {
548| $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
549|
550| $errors = $validator->validate([
551| 'type' => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_AMBIENTAL,
552| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
553| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
554| 'location' => 'Área externa',
555| 'description' => 'Vazamento em solo',
556| 'consequence' => 'AA2',
557| 'aprofundamento_complete' => true,
558| 'details' => [
559| 'activity' => 'Transferência',
560| 'approach' => 'CORRECAO_OPERACIONAL',
Request #6
deepseek-v4-flash
P:18.37K C:452 CR:16K CW:0
4017ms
Reasoning
The test change seems consistent with current validator logic. The test at line 454 also includes 'caracterizado como acidente' as one of the acceptable errors in `testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoCompleteExigeCamposTecnicosComMensagemHumana` — wait, that test passes without `descaracter_suspect`. That allows any of Consequência real / Tipo de lesão / caracterizado como acidente errors, so it passes even when caracterizar isn't triggered.
Let me verify the validator change is consistent - the test modified asserts the caracterizado error appears when suspect is '1'. Yes.
Now, let me examine whether the test correctly represents the actual semantics. The test wants to assert that when there's suspicion of descaracterização, the doctor must state whether it was caracterizado. With suspect=1 and descaracterizado absent, the error "Informe se o evento é caracterizado como acidente (Sim/Não)." fires. Good.
But wait — check for a subtle issue: The test also sets `had_injury` true and provides injury fields. But without `descaracterizado` being set, the first error fires and comment check skipped. So assertion passes.
Let me also verify the error assertion message checks for substring 'caracterizado como acidente' which is in the message 'Informe se o evento é caracterizado como acidente (Sim/Não).'. Yes.
Now, is there any issue with renaming the test? Test name no longer matches some data provider or references? Search for references to the old method name.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoMedicoExigeCaracterizar"}
Result
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "descaracter_suspect", "file_patterns": ["tests/Ssma/"]}
Result
No matches found
Request #7
deepseek-v4-flash
P:18.85K C:1.72K CR:18.82K CW:0
12810ms
Reasoning
No other references to the old method name. Good.
Let me examine whether there is any other place where `descaracter_suspect` is being set to `'1'` and then what happens if `descaracterizado` also is not set in the real flow. In the real front-end flow (SSmaAutomationService line 648): `$suspect = ($payload['descaracter_suspect'] ?? '0') === '1';`. Let's see what happens with it. Not strictly necessary.
Let's think about whether this test is in scope. The PR scope is offboarding eSocial; this test change is about SsmaEventValidator. It might be an extra change that slipped in, perhaps unrelated. But per the review rules, we only comment on actual issues. A test change aligning with the current validator logic seems beneficial. However, the strict rule in the review checklist says "Teste deve cobrir o caminho de integração real...". But that applies to PR changes that altered behavior without tests. This is a unit test update to match existing behavior of the validator.
Wait — actually, let me check whether the validator source was changed in this same PR. The other changed files list doesn't include SsmaEventValidator.php. So the validator code is pre-existing. Then this test change might be a fix to a broken test (the test previously expected caracterizar to be required without suspicion, but the code only requires when suspect). If the validator was changed in an earlier commit within the same feature branch (perhaps merged from new_production), then the test fixes it.
Let me consider: was the old test (before the diff) failing? The old test had no `descaracter_suspect` and no `descaracterizado`. Under current validator, `$hasSuspect` false → no error about caracterizar. The assertion at old line 885-888 would then fail. So this change FIXES a failing test. If the old test was passing before the validator code was changed to require suspect flag, then the PR likely includes (in an earlier commit not shown) the validator behavior change. The whole PR mentions "docs/ssma" and SSMA tests... Actually the PR scope is offboarding; this could be a stray change. But we can't be sure.
Now, potential code issue in the test change itself: does the test correctly include all fields required so that only the caracterizar error triggers? It doesn't matter because the test only asserts that caracterizado message exists; other errors can coexist.
But wait — there's a subtlety. With `descaracter_suspect = '1'` and `descaracterizado` NOT set, the error message 'Informe se o evento é caracterizado como acidente (Sim/Não).' is generated. So assertion passes. Good.
But wait, another subtlety: with `aprofundamento_only = true`, what else? Let me check what other errors occur in the aprofundamento validation. If the payload has all the required fields filled (nature, agent, consequence, impacts), perhaps the errors list will only contain the caracterizar error. Fine.
Now, let me confirm this test change is correct relative to the actual behavior of the SsmaEventValidator, which we saw. Good — the change makes the test pass and align.
Is there a genuine issue to report? Possibly none. But let me think about test correctness more deeply:
Test name: "ComSuspeitaExigeCaracterizar" — asserts that with suspicion, caracterizar info is required. But the test doesn't set `descaracterizado`, so it only checks that the "Informe se..." error is triggered. However, consider: is there a corresponding test verifying that with `descaracter_suspect=1` AND `descaracterizado='1'` AND missing comment the "comentário obrigatório" fires? That would be a complementary test. Its absence is a gap but maybe covered elsewhere in `tests/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php`? Actually `ValidateLocalFixesTest.php` lines 153 & 192 includes `descaracter_comment` and `descaracterizado`. Let me check those quickly.
Actually, the main concern for review: minimal test change - the rename and the added field. Both are consistent with the codebase rule. There might be nothing to flag.
But wait — one consideration: the rename changes the test description to state "ComSuspeita". Is there another test covering the case "aprofundamento médico sem suspeita não exige caracterizar"? This gap is arguably relevant because the rule changed to gate on suspect. But there's `testAcidentePessoalEtapa1SemAprofundamentoPassaValidacao` etc. Actually, is there any test asserting caracterizar isn't required in aprofundamento when no suspicion? If not, then the rule's negative case is untested. But since the code is not in this review group, and we shouldn't demand tests beyond the change... The user rules say to suggest tests for concrete changed failure modes. The rule gating caracterizar on suspect is a changed failure mode: previously caracterizar was required always in aprofundamento (per the old test name) - now it requires the suspect flag. The test updated only covers the positive case. The negative case (aprofundamento without suspect shouldn't require caracterizar) might be a meaningful regression scenario.
Hmm, let me verify whether this is actually a behavioral change. Was there a prior version of validator where the rule didn't gate on `hasSuspect`? Since the validator isn't in the review group, I cannot be sure. Let me not overreach.
Let me consider whether the test file change itself introduces a problem: adding `descaracter_suspect => '1'` while NOT adding `descaracterizado`/`descaracter_comment` means the assertion passes only on the first error path. But the test message says 'Médico deve informar se foi caracterizado.' That is accurate.
Actually, wait. Let me carefully re-read the assertion in the changed test:
```php
self::assertTrue(
(bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'caracterizado como acidente')),
'Médico deve informar se foi caracterizado. Erros: ' . implode(' | ', $errors)
);
```
The error message fired when descaracterizado is missing: 'Informe se o evento é caracterizado como acidente (Sim/Não).' — contains substring. Good.
Now is there anything that suggests the test could pass even if the code is wrong? E.g., weak substring matching. The substring 'caracterizado como acidente' matches the specific message. It's not too generic. Fine.
Also let me double check line 454 test: it's an OR with other errors; that test still passes.
I think the change is reasonable. It's a unit test, matching validator logic. There's no obvious code issue.
However, per user-specific test rules, "Se a PR alterou comportamento e não trouxe teste novo/atualizado cobrindo esse comportamento, sinalize como pendência". Here test was updated, so fine.
Wait — but maybe there IS a problem: The test renamed implies the previous test without suspicion was WRONG per the new rule (i.e., the behavior changed so caracterizar is no longer required unless suspect). The change to the test is being done in this PR. But what if the validator code in `tests/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php` (the other duplicate test file) has an older test for the same scenario that wasn't updated, so there is inconsistency? Let me check that file.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "aprofundamento|caracterizado como acidente|Aprofundamento", "file_patterns": ["tests/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php"]}
Result
No matches found
Request #8
deepseek-v4-flash
P:20.58K C:82 CR:20.48K CW:0
1204ms
Reasoning
There is a file `tests/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php` found earlier by file_find. Let me check what's in it.
Tool Calls (1)
file_find
Show Details
Arguments
{"query_name": "SsmaEventValidatorTest"}
Result
tests/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php
Request #9
deepseek-v4-flash
P:20.7K C:89 CR:20.61K CW:0
1119ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "tests/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php", "start_line": 1, "end_line": 60}
Result
File: tests/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php (Total lines: 324)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-60
1|<?php
2|
3|declare(strict_types=1);
4|
5|namespace App\Tests\Ssma;
6|
7|use App\Enum\Ssma\EventTypeEnum;
8|use App\Service\Ssma\SsmaEventValidator;
9|use PHPUnit\Framework\TestCase;
10|
11|final class SsmaEventValidatorTest extends TestCase
12|{
13| public function testValidAcidentePessoalPayload(): void
14| {
15| $v = new SsmaEventValidator();
16| $errors = $v->validate([
17| 'type' => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_PESSOAL,
18| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
19| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
20| 'location' => 'Linha 2',
21| 'description' => 'Teste',
22| 'nature' => 'CORTE',
23| 'agent' => 'FERRAMENTA',
24| 'consequence' => 'LESAO_LEVE',
25| 'impacts' => ['PESSOA'],
26| 'details' => [
27| 'activity' => 'Operação de corte',
28| 'approach' => 'TREINAMENTO',
29| 'barrier_type' => 'FISICA',
30| 'potential_consequence' => 'LESAO_MODERADA',
31| 'potential_severity' => 'MEDIO',
32| 'person_id' => '101',
33| 'person_type' => 'COLABORADOR',
34| 'had_injury' => true,
35| 'injury_type' => 'CORTE',
36| 'injury_classification' => 'FAC',
37| 'work_leave' => 'NAO',
38| 'injury_severity' => 'LEVE',
39| 'descaracterizado' => '0',
40| 'descaracter_comment' => 'Acidente confirmado.',
41| 'body_parts' => [
42| ['region' => 'MAO', 'side' => 'DIREITA', 'injury_type' => 'CORTE'],
43| ],
44| ],
45| ]);
46| self::assertSame([], $errors);
47| }
48|
49| public function testAcidentePessoalOptionalBodyDetailAndHandFinger(): void
50| {
51| $v = new SsmaEventValidator();
52| $errors = $v->validate([
53| 'type' => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_PESSOAL,
54| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
55| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
56| 'location' => 'Linha 2',
57| 'description' => 'Teste',
58| 'nature' => 'CORTE',
59| 'agent' => 'FERRAMENTA',
60| 'consequence' => 'LESAO_LEVE',
Request #10
deepseek-v4-flash
P:21.56K C:1.85K CR:20.74K CW:0
14803ms
Reasoning
That is a different test file for the same validator. Not directly in scope.
Now, we should decide whether to report any issue for the test diff. Let me evaluate thoroughly:
1. Test rename - aligns with rule. Fine.
2. Adding `descaracter_suspect => '1'` - aligns. Fine.
One subtle issue: This unit test only tests the error path when `descaracterizado` is absent (so the message 'Informe se o evento é caracterizado como acidente (Sim/Não).'). But the test name says "ExigeCaracterizar" (requires caracterização). Actually, with suspect=1 and no `descaracterizado`, this is the "caracterizar required" branch. That's consistent.
Now consider whether the test could be failing due to a field order/format issue: `descaracter_suspect => '1'` string. The rule checks `!empty($d['descaracter_suspect']) && $d['descaracter_suspect'] !== '0'`. '1' is truthy. Good.
Is the diff adding only `'descaracter_suspect' => '1',`? Yes.
Let me check the failing scenario possibility: Maybe the whole purpose of the test was different and previously the rule was different. Since only the test file is in the review group, we only have to validate that the test code matches the production code (which it does now). No bug.
Now think about the scope mismatch: this test change is unrelated to the offboarding PR scope. But that is a PR-governance matter; there's no evidence this change causes issues. However the user-specific rules emphasize regression. But we shouldn't flag scope issues without evidence.
Wait — one more consideration: What about the other SSMA-related behavior of "comentário obrigatório"? In the modified test the comment is not present. The first error fires because descaracterizado isn't in ['0','1']. Actually wait — re-read the rule:
```php
$descVal = array_key_exists('descaracterizado', $d) ? (string) $d['descaracterizado'] : '';
if ($hasSuspect) {
if (!\in_array($descVal, ['0', '1'], true)) {
$errors[] = 'Informe se o evento é caracterizado como acidente (Sim/Não).';
} else {
// comment required
}
}
```
So the message to assert is correct.
Alright, I conclude that there's no bug in this diff. However, let me double check one more possibility: The test previously (before rename) was asserting that caracterizar is required in aprofundamento WITHOUT suspect. Was the previous production behavior different (requiring always in aprofundamento)? If yes, then the current PR changed the production code to only require when suspect (a rule change). If so, then the test update covers only the positive case, and there could be a regression: previously all medical aprofundamento required caracterizar decision; now a medical aprofundamento without suspicion (e.g. the UI didn't send descaracter_suspect at all) would NOT require the caracterização step — meaning a closing médico could skip the "descaracterizado" decision. Is that the intended new rule? The comment in the validator says "Caracterizar é do médico no aprofundamento dedicado — não na criação. Sim/Não + comentário só são obrigatórios quando há suspeita de descaracterização marcada." This comment explicitly states the intended rule. And docs reference (docs/ssma/ocorrencia-07-suspeita-descaracterizacao-ui.md) that suspicion is a new UI concept. So requiring caracterizar only when suspect is intended behavior.
But then: there may be a case where the UI never marks suspect but the doctor still needs to record whether the event was characterized. That's a business-rule question, not something this test diff decides. The production code already implements it; test aligns.
Since production code isn't in review scope, I shouldn't report about the production rule. However, per the checklist, tests should cover changed failure modes: the negative case where no suspect → caracterizar is not required (i.e., no regression with a payload that previously would have been blocked). But is that really a regression risk? If old code required caracterizar decision always in aprofundamento and new code doesn't, then events that previously required the caracterização could now be closed without it — a data completeness regression. Given the PR includes such change? We have no visibility of the production code diff (not in review files). But we saw the code comments that say it's intended (dedicated aprofundamento). Let me check the docs to see if this behavior is intended.
Actually, wait. Let me reconsider: the comment says "Caracterizar é do médico no aprofundamento dedicado — não na criação." And gating on suspicion. So the intended behavior per code comment.
Is this test diff part of an unrelated change? The change simply updates an existing test that apparently was failing with the current code — indicating someone previously changed the validator behavior and this test was stale, and this PR fixes it. Or the whole feature branch included a validator behavior change and the test updates came along. Regardless, the test itself is fine.
Should I report the missing negative-case test as a pending item (Atenção)? The user rules say: "Se a PR alterou comportamento e não trouxe teste novo/atualizado cobrindo esse comportamento, sinalize como pendência". The behavior here (validator rule gating caracterizar on suspect) is not in the review diff — only the test is. There's no production change in this review group to be concerned with. Given precision-over-recall, and only reviewing the changed test, I don't have a concrete defect to report.
Let me quickly verify the behavior doesn't break the test by checking if `aprofundamento_only` triggers further validation that would add conflicting messages that fail assertTrue? No, assertTrue only requires the substring to exist.
One more consideration: `injury_severity => 'LEVE'` etc. — potential errors elsewhere (e.g., 'Com afastamento total...' no). This test doesn't include `work_leave`. Let me check whether other validations would add errors that might include the string 'caracterizado como acidente' — no, only the caracterizar rule yields that message.
I think the diff is fine. There's nothing to flag. Let me also ensure the changed test's purpose isn't duplicated or contradictory with the earlier test at lines 843-846 (creation with aprofundamento_complete but no aprofundamento_only → caracterizar NOT required). That's for creation context; new test is aprofundamento_only context (doctor). Both align with the code.
Final conclusion: No issues to report; the test change aligns the test with existing/current validator behavior (only requires caracterização decision when suspicion is flagged) and the renamed test accurately reflects the scenario. Given this, I'll do one more sanity check that the test actually passes — verify all required inputs to reach the caracterizar path: need `aprofundamento_only` true (set), `type` ACIDENTE_PESSOAL (set). Also need the validation method that runs this snippet to be invoked on `validate`. Yes, tests call `$validator->validate(...)`.
Now maybe we should check whether the code snippet at validator line 718 only runs in some method. Let me quickly see validateAcidentePessoal's dispatch - but the test previously already asserted this message; path is exercised. Fine.
I'll finalize with no comments? But wait — the instructions: review every file listed. I did. Since no issues found, call task_done.
Hmm, but let me think again about whether there is a genuine gap worth flagging as low severity: the added suspect flag '1' alone is fine, but the test still doesn't fully validate the intended rule, e.g., scenario where `descaracter_suspect=1` but `descaracterizado='1'` without a comment → should require comment. There is `ValidateLocalFixesTest.php` with descaracter_comment. Let me check whether a test covers the comment required path for the aprofundamento with suspect, to decide whether to flag a test gap.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "tests/Ssma/ValidateLocalFixesTest.php", "start_line": 100, "end_line": 220}
Result
File: tests/Ssma/ValidateLocalFixesTest.php (Total lines: 367)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 100-220
100| public function testLegacyEnvironmentalValueIsInvalid(string $value): void
101| {
102| $this->assertFalse(
103| EnvironmentalMediumEnum::isValid($value),
104| "Valor legado '$value' ainda existe no enum — não deveria ser aceito pelo validator!"
105| );
106| }
107|
108| public static function legacyEnvironmentalValues(): array
109| {
110| // AGUA e MULTIPLO eram enviados antes da correção e causavam erro 422
111| return [
112| ['AGUA'],
113| ['MULTIPLO'],
114| ];
115| }
116|
117| // ---------------------------------------------------------------
118| // 3. Payload completo — Acidente Pessoal com barrier corrigida
119| // ---------------------------------------------------------------
120|
121| public function testAcidentePessoalPayloadWithEngenharia(): void
122| {
123| $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
124|
125| $errors = $validator->validate([
126| 'type' => 'ACIDENTE_PESSOAL',
127| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
128| 'datetime' => '2026-04-17T09:00:00',
129| 'location' => 'Setor de armazenagem',
130| 'description' => 'Colaborador escorregou nos degraus molhados e sofreu torção no tornozelo.',
131| 'nature' => 'QUEDA',
132| 'agent' => 'ESTRUTURA',
133| 'consequence' => 'LESAO_LEVE',
134| 'impacts' => ['PESSOA'],
135| 'details' => [
136| 'activity' => 'Movimentação de carga',
137| 'approach' => 'TREINAMENTO',
138| 'strategic_nature' => 'SEGURANCA',
139| 'barrier_type' => 'FISICA',
140| 'person_id' => '42',
141| 'person_type' => 'COLABORADOR',
142| 'had_injury' => true,
143| 'injury_type' => 'CONTUSAO',
144| 'injury_severity' => 'LEVE',
145| 'body_parts' => [
146| ['region' => 'PERNA', 'side' => 'DIREITA', 'injury_type' => 'CONTUSAO'],
147| ],
148| 'potential_consequence' => 'LESAO_LEVE',
149| 'potential_severity' => 'BAIXO',
150| 'injury_classification' => 'FAC',
151| 'work_leave' => 'NAO',
152| 'descaracterizado' => '0',
153| 'descaracter_comment' => 'Caracterizado como acidente de trabalho conforme análise técnica.',
154| ],
155| ]);
156|
157| $this->assertEmpty($errors, 'Acidente Pessoal completo não deve ter erros: ' . implode('; ', $errors));
158| }
159|
160| public function testAcidentePessoalPayloadWithPermissaoTrabalho(): void
161| {
162| $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
163|
164| $errors = $validator->validate([
165| 'type' => 'ACIDENTE_PESSOAL',
166| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
167| 'datetime' => '2026-04-17T14:30:00',
168| 'location' => 'Área de manutenção elétrica',
169| 'description' => 'Colaborador recebeu choque ao operar equipamento sem permissão de trabalho.',
170| 'nature' => 'CHOQUE_ELETRICO',
171| 'agent' => 'EQUIPAMENTO_ELETRICO',
172| 'consequence' => 'LESAO_MODERADA',
173| 'impacts' => ['PESSOA'],
174| 'details' => [
175| 'activity' => 'Manutenção preventiva',
176| 'approach' => 'MELHORIA_PROCESSO',
177| 'strategic_nature' => 'SEGURANCA',
178| 'barrier_type' => 'ADMINISTRATIVA',
179| 'person_id' => '77',
180| 'person_type' => 'COLABORADOR',
181| 'had_injury' => true,
182| 'injury_type' => 'QUEIMADURA',
183| 'injury_severity' => 'MODERADA',
184| 'body_parts' => [
185| ['region' => 'MAO', 'side' => 'ESQUERDA', 'injury_type' => 'QUEIMADURA'],
186| ],
187| 'potential_consequence' => 'LESAO_MODERADA',
188| 'potential_severity' => 'MEDIO',
189| 'injury_classification' => 'MTC',
190| 'work_leave' => 'NAO',
191| 'descaracterizado' => '0',
192| 'descaracter_comment' => 'Caracterizado como acidente de trabalho conforme análise técnica.',
193| ],
194| ]);
195|
196| $this->assertEmpty($errors, 'Acidente Pessoal com PERMISSAO_TRABALHO não deve ter erros: ' . implode('; ', $errors));
197| }
198|
199| // ---------------------------------------------------------------
200| // 4. Payload completo — Acidente Ambiental com valores corrigidos
201| // ---------------------------------------------------------------
202|
203| public function testAcidenteAmbientalWithAguaSuperficial(): void
204| {
205| $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
206|
207| $errors = $validator->validate([
208| 'type' => 'ACIDENTE_AMBIENTAL',
209| 'datetime' => '2026-04-17T10:00:00',
210| 'location' => 'Rio lateral à planta industrial',
211| 'description' => 'Tubulação rompida gerou derramamento de óleo hidráulico no rio próximo.',
212| 'nature' => 'VAZAMENTO',
213| 'agent' => 'EFLUENTE',
214| 'consequence' => 'ALTO',
215| 'impacts' => ['AMBIENTAL'],
216| 'details' => [
217| 'activity' => 'Transferência de efluente',
218| 'approach' => 'MELHORIA_PROCESSO',
219| 'environmental_medium' => 'AGUA_SUPERFICIAL',
220| 'pollutant_type' => 'OLEO_LUBRIFICANTE_GRAXA',
Request #11
deepseek-v4-flash
P:25.07K C:1.67K CR:23.3K CW:0
13123ms
Reasoning
These other tests set `descaracterizado => '0'` + comment but never set `descaracter_suspect`. So `$hasSuspect` is false, and those fields are not required — they are only present for documentation purposes (payload completeness). Those tests pass either way.
So the current changed test is the only one that tests the "suspect → require caracterização" path, plus it asserts the "informe se caracterizado" message when missing. There's no test covering the "suspect + descaracterizado=1/0 without comment → comment required" branch, but that branch isn't changed in this diff.
The question is whether I should report anything. Let me reconsider the whole picture:
- The review scope file: only the unit test. The change is a test fix aligning with existing/valid code.
- No production code change is within the review group.
- No security, isolation, data integrity implications.
Potential feedback points:
1. Scope: this SSMA test change appears unrelated to the offboarding PR scope. But is it actually unrelated? The original PR description covers SSMA? Not in the listed scope. Other changed files don't include the SSMA validator. Actually wait — this test file change was in the diff and might be part of the feature branch commits ("+12 commits omitidos"). But we cannot verify whether validator code changed within those 12 commits (other changed files not shown might include it). Given the other_changed_files list is complete for the PR? It says "Other files changed in this update (not in this review group)". The validator is NOT among them, so the validator change wasn't part of the PR. So the test change corresponds to pre-existing validator behavior, meaning the test was failing (stale) prior to this change, and this PR fixes it — possibly the validator behavior changed earlier and this test was updated here.
Given the principle of focusing on code logic and not speculation, no clear defect.
Wait — should I verify whether the test was indeed previously failing? If yes, then this change fixes it — good. If no, then the change may weaken the test. Under the old code (if it required caracterizar unconditionally in aprofundamento), the old test passed. Under the current code, the old test fails (since no suspect). So this change is needed to make the test pass with current code. So it's a legitimate test update.
Hold on: if the old code required caracterizar unconditionally for aprofundamento, then the current production code (gating on suspect) represents a behavioral loosening. If that loosening happened outside this PR in an earlier commit, fine. But this PR (offboarding) didn't touch SSMA behavior... The test update in the offboarding PR might be an attempt to make the suite green after merging new_production (sync merge). This could mask a regression introduced by the sync merge: events in "aprofundamento dedicado" where suspicion isn't flagged could now bypass the caracterização decision. But that's speculative about production code changes not in the diff.
Given we should "confirm the declared and runtime contract before flagging", and the code comment explicitly states the intended contract ("Sim/Não + comentário só são obrigatórios quando há suspeita de descaracterização marcada"), the updated test matches the contract. There's no concrete bug in the changed test code.
I could consider flagging a low-severity test-coverage note: the updated test asserts the "Informe se ..." path, but there's no assertion of the complementary branch where `descaracterizado` is informed without the comment (comment mandatory), nor a negative-case test (aprofundamento without suspect doesn't require caracterização). But per "precision over recall" and not demanding extra tests without a concrete changed failure mode, this is not blocking. However the user-specific rules encourage flagging test gaps only when behavior changed. Since we cannot confirm the production behavior changed in this PR, maybe not flag.
Let me double-check: In the review diff, we have only 2 hunks:
1. rename method.
2. add `'descaracter_suspect' => '1',`.
Both consistent.
Final decision: no issues to report; call task_done.
Actually, wait. Let me reconsider severity/validity of one nuance. The test rename says "ComSuspeitaExigeCaracterizar" — but with suspect=1 and descaracterizado missing, we assert the generic message. Fine.
But is the test payload otherwise complete? Consider that with `aprofundamento_only=true` set, maybe other required fields of the dedicated aprofundamento must be validated too, e.g., missing `descaracter_comment`? If descaracterizado were set to a value... no, not set.
One more nuance: the payload doesn't include `descaracterizado` key at all. In the validator, `array_key_exists` returns false → $descVal = ''. It triggers 'Informe se ...'. That's the intended assertion. Great.
I'm confident the change is fine. Call task_done with DONE.
But before finalizing, maybe I should consider: is there a chance that the newly added `descaracter_suspect => '1'` also causes OTHER validation errors that could make the test's `assertTrue` pass for the wrong reason? assertTrue only requires the substring present; extra errors don't matter. No issue.
Also, the test still passes message check even if other fields missing produce additional errors. Fine.
Alright — but let me reflect on whether the test change properly belongs in this PR at all. Given the review guidelines: "Focus on issues in newly added code." If we flag scope mismatch, we need evidence. We have PR scope (offboarding eSocial) and a test change about SSMA validator which isn't among the feature-related files. But other changed files in this PR include SSMA? The "other_changed_files" includes Entity EsocialS2299..., nothing about SSMA validator. However, the +12 commits omitted might have SSMA changes. Actually the omitted commits — we only see a subset. Let me look at the commit list: the commits shown are related to the repository fix and draft service. "+12 commits omitidos". So we cannot infer the full PR scope. Better not flag scope.
Conclusion: no issues. task_done.
Analisei o único arquivo do grupo de review, `tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php`.
Contexto verificado:
- A regra no `SsmaEventValidator` (linhas 715–730) só exige a decisão de caracterização ("Informe se o evento é caracterizado como acidente") quando o payload marca suspeita de descaracterização (`descaracter_suspect` presente e diferente de `'0'`).
- Sem o novo campo `descaracter_suspect => '1'`, o teste antigo nunca disparava o ramo da regra e falharia com o código atual — a adição corrige o cenário.
- O novo nome do método (`...ComSuspeitaExigeCaracterizar`) reflete com precisão a pré-condição testada.
- Não há outras referências ao método renomeado no código; a mensagem verificada (`'caracterizado como acidente'`) corresponde ao texto real produzido pelo validador.
- O payload não fornece `descaracterizado`, então o erro esperado é corretamente o de exigir o Sim/Não.
A mudança apenas realinha o teste unitário ao contrato já implementado no validador, sem implicações de segurança, isolamento por empresa ou integridade de dados no que foi alterado.
Tool Calls (1)
task_done
Show Details
Arguments
{"state": "DONE"}
Review Comments (5 findings)
migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php 1 comments
src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php 1 comments
src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php 1 comments
src/Service/Offboarding/OffboardingEsocialS2299DraftService.php 2 comments
No comments match this filter.