Session: 8bcacee3-de33-4250-a46d-976aff3add3d
Coverage
6
Selected
6
Completed
0
Reused
0
Failed
0
Waived
Token Usage
9.23M
Prompt Tokens
113.59K
Completion Tokens
9.34M
Total Tokens
130
LLM Requests
8.84M
Cache Read
0
Cache Write
File breakdown 3 files
| File | Prompt | Completion | Cache Read | Cache Write | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig,templates… | 9.21M | 111.49K | 8.83M | 0 | 9.33M |
| src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php | 16.65K | 904 | 11.14K | 0 | 17.55K |
| File Grouping | 400 | 1.2K | 0 | 0 | 1.6K |
Files Reviewed 6 files
- templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig
- templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig
- templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_add_approver.html.twig
- templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig
- src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php
- templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig
Session Tasks 1 tasks
File Grouping 1 requests
grouping_task
Request #1
deepseek-v4-flash
P:400 C:1.2K
8804ms
Reasoning
We need to group changed files into semantically related clusters. Files: Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php, templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig, templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_add_approver.html.twig, templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig, templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig, templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig.
They all seem related to governance authorization feature. The service file likely supports automation. Templates include authorization index, modals, tabs. All belong to same module/feature. Likely one group. But check semantics: service is a PHP class, templates are UI. They are related? SsmaAutomationService might be for Ssma automation, perhaps invoked from authorization UI. Since only one service change and it's small (+0/-1) maybe it's related. Group all together under "governance authorization feature". But could service be separate? Need examine context: no content but path Ssma (maybe SQL Server Migration Assistant). Could be unrelated to templates? But changed files list is small and all under governance/authorization except service. The service might be used in authorization process. Given file path Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php, not governance. But likely changed to support template? Hmm.
We need output JSON array with groups. Could be one group containing all six. Or two groups: one for templates and one for service. But grouping rule: same module/feature. The service is in Ssma namespace, but directory "Service/Ssma" maybe part of application. Templates are governance authorization. They might be completely unrelated modifications in same commit. Without more info, we must infer semantic relationship. The service name "SsmaAutomationService" may be about automation for "SSMA" and templates are authorization forms. Unlikely related. The service modification is a deletion of one line. Could be unrelated bugfix. To be safe, group templates together because they share directory and feature. Service separate because different module and producer/consumer? Wait producer/consumer relationship could exist: templates might call a route that uses service. But no evidence. Need decide.
Read files:
- templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig (main page)
- partials/_modal_add_approver.html.twig (new modal for adding approver)
- partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig (modal authorization form)
- tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig (create tab)
- tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig (settings tab)
All clearly governance authorization UI. The service SsmaAutomationService likely handles "Ssma" automation (maybe SQL Server Migration Assistant) and is not part of governance. It is in Service/Ssma directory. So group separately. But there could be a "Ssma" integration in authorization? No.
Need output JSON array. Since rules say every file in exactly one group. We can have two groups:
1. Governance authorization templates (5 files)
2. Ssma automation service (1 file)
Let's ensure max 10, okay.
But perhaps the service is related to authorization workflow: maybe it automates approvals via Ssma? Ssma is a tool? The file name "SsmaAutomationService" suggests it automates SSMA (SQL Server Migration Assistant) for access? Actually "Ssma" could be "Service Management Automation"? Need not guess. The path "Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php" likely represents a service in an "Ssma" module. Templates under "governance/authorization" are unrelated. Unless governance authorization UI references Ssma service when creating authorizations? Not likely.
Given the instruction: "Files in the same group typically: Belong to the same module/feature; Have producer/consumer relationships (e.g. interface and implementation); Are i18n/config variants; Share same directory and work together." Service directory doesn't share directory with templates. Therefore separate.
Let's craft JSON. Use labels.
Group 1 label: "Governance authorization templates"
Group 2 label: "Ssma automation service adjustment"
But maybe "Ssma automation service" is a single class. Output file paths with exact strings.
Paths:
src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php
templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig
templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_add_approver.html.twig
templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig
templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig
templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig
Need JSON.
[
{
"label": "Governance authorization templates",
"files": [
"templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig",
"templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_add_approver.html.twig",
"templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig",
"templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig",
"templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig"
]
},
{
"label": "Ssma automation service",
"files": [
"src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php"
]
}
]
Conversations 2 files
src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php 2 requests
main_task
Request #1
deepseek-v4-flash
P:7.83K C:629 CR:2.69K CW:0
5231ms
Reasoning
The review_files contains only one file: `src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php`. The diff shows only a removal of a blank line after `<?php`. This is trivial. Let me look at the diff more carefully.
The diff:
```
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
<?php
-
declare(strict_types=1);
namespace App\Service\Ssma;
```
That's the entire change - just removing a blank line between `<?php` and `declare(strict_types=1);`. This is a whitespace/formatting change with no functional effect.
The user asks to review other changed files too in context but the strict focus rules say review every file in <review_files> individually and only comment on those. The only file in review_files is the SsmaAutomationService.php with a trivial whitespace change.
Given the rule "Avoid commenting on correct code or unchanged code." and there's no functional issue. I should not flag the removal of blank line since it has no effect. Per user specific rule - style-only findings without real effect should be short and low priority, but not necessary to comment.
Let me verify the file context to be sure. Let me read a bit of the file to check it's not hiding other changes. Actually the diff for this file shows only that one hunk. So the entire change is removing a blank line.
Should I call task_done? Yes, since no issues. But wait, maybe I should check that the file still complies to PHP CS rule (no blank line after `<?php` is actually a rule in some projects, e.g. `no_blank_lines_after_phpdoc`... Actually `blank_line_after_opening_tag` would want a blank line. Hmm. In PSR-12, a blank line is NOT required after opening tag. Actually there are CS rules both ways. Let me check the rest of the file to ensure it exists and there aren't related deletions.
Given the scope, the change is trivially a whitespace removal. There's nothing to comment. I'll do a quick read to confirm the file content and then call task_done.
Let me check composer / code style config perhaps. But it's overkill. The change is minimal with no functional consequence.
However, given the task mentions "Outros arquivos alterados" and that review group only includes the PHP file, the actual review group file is the Ssma service. We must focus on that. The diff is trivial.
Let me do a quick sanity read of the file to confirm context.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php", "start_line": 1, "end_line": 30}
Result
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php (Total lines: 3254) IS_TRUNCATED: false LINE_RANGE: 1-30 1|<?php 2|declare(strict_types=1); 3| 4|namespace App\Service\Ssma; 5| 6|use App\Entity\Company; 7|use App\Entity\CompanyArea; 8|use App\Entity\CompanyMemberArea; 9|use App\Entity\CompanyMembers; 10|use App\Entity\Config; 11|use App\Entity\EmailTemplate; 12|use App\Entity\NotificationSpecialist; 13|use App\Entity\SsmaOccurrence; 14|use App\Entity\SsmaEvent; 15|use App\Entity\SsmaRefusalRight; 16|use App\Entity\SsmaPermissionTag; 17|use App\Entity\SsmaPermissionTagMember; 18|use App\Entity\User; 19|use App\Repository\SsmaPermissionTagRepository; 20|use App\Service\Mail\SwiftSmtpTransportResolver; 21|use App\Enum\Ssma\BarrierTypeEnum; 22|use App\Enum\Ssma\EventConsequenceEnum; 23|use App\Enum\Ssma\EventTypeEnum; 24|use App\Entity\CompanyTeam; 25|use Doctrine\ORM\EntityManagerInterface; 26|use Psr\Log\LoggerInterface; 27|use Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\ParameterBag\ParameterBagInterface; 28|use Symfony\Component\Yaml\Yaml; 29|use Twig\Environment; 30|use Swift_Mailer;
Request #2
deepseek-v4-flash
P:8.82K C:275 CR:8.45K CW:0
3019ms
Reasoning
The only change to this file is removal of a blank line after `<?php`. No functional impact. The file is huge (3254 lines), a god object possibly, but there are no logic changes in this diff.
Since the diff is purely whitespace/formatting with no functional effect and is not part of the declared feature scope in any meaningful way (it's just a stray blank line cleanup), there's nothing to flag. Per instructions, avoid commenting on correct code, and avoid non-functional elements.
I'll call task_done.
O arquivo do grupo de revisão (`src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php`) contém apenas a remoção de uma linha em branco entre `<?php` e `declare(strict_types=1);`. A mudança é puramente cosmética, não altera contrato, comportamento, fluxo de dados nem escopo funcional — e não há outro arquivo PHP no grupo de revisão para cruzar.
Nenhum problema funcional, de segurança, isolamento por empresa ou integridade de dados foi identificado neste diff.
Tool Calls (1)
task_done
Show Details
Arguments
{"state": "DONE"}
templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig,templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_add_approver.html.twig,templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig,templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig,templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig 127 requests
plan_task
Request #1
deepseek-v4-flash
P:27.68K C:25.9K CR:1.41K CW:0
216297ms
Reasoning
O usuário quer que eu analise as mudanças de código (templates Twig de um módulo de governança/autorizações) e produza um plano de revisão estruturado em português (pt-BR), seguindo o formato estrito definido nas instruções do sistema. Não posso chamar ferramentas de verdade — apenas descrever as intenções de chamada nas linhas `→`.
Vamos analisar os diffs:
### Arquivos alterados nesse grupo de review
1. `templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig` — adiciona aba "Configurações", inclui novo template `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig`, e adiciona `govAuthAddApproverModal` à lista de modais para mover ao body.
2. `templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_add_approver.html.twig` — NOVO arquivo: modal de adicionar aprovador com busca, filtros (cargo, time, vínculo), tabela com checkboxes e seleção de área de aplicação por linha. Inclui muito CSS inline e o modal usa `modal_id: 'govAuthAddApproverModal'`.
3. `templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig` — MODIFICADO: adiciona campos: Título, Área Responsável, Aprovador, Cargo aprovador, Tipo, Descrição, Requisito; esconde dependências documentais (`d-none`); field de responsável permanece; seletores customizados; atualização da função de sync; validação; payload com `area_id`, `aprovador_id`, `aprovador_role_id`, `tipo`.
4. `templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig` — MODIFICADO: botão "visualizar" agora aparece sempre (mesmo sem permissão de criar? — vamos ver: antes `autActionsCell` ficava vazio se não podia criar; agora o botão visualizar fica sempre presente e depois mescla os de editar/apagar se tiver permissão). Adiciona lógica JS para sincronizar selects custom, `ensureAutCriarSelectOption`, `applyAutCriarModalFields` lê campos novos, `markAutCriarSelectInvalid`, validação com novos campos, payload com novos campos. Função `window.ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes` e stub `ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers` vazio.
5. `templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` — NOVO arquivo gigante (1223 linhas) com UI de Configurações: tipos de autorização (chips), aprovadores padrão (membros/cargos), persistência via AJAX POST com debounce 400ms, modal de adicionar aprovador.
Outro arquivo fora do grupo: `src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php` (modificado, -1 linha) — não está no grupo de review, mas é mencionado.
Agora, identificar riscos e problemas.
## Análise de riscos / problemas
### XSS (alto)
1. `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig`: `data-name`, etc. vindos de `catalogMembers`/`catalogRoles` (dados do servidor) são gravados no DOM via atributos (`row.setAttribute('data-name', item.name)`) e inseridos como `textContent` (seguro). `createChip` usa `textContent` — seguro. O `initialTypes` é inserido via `json_encode` no JS — não é HTML, então é seguro.
Porém, `addTypeChip` permite que o usuário digite um tipo com até 80 caracteres, incluindo qualquer caractere... O valor é armazenado e inserido via `textContent` e também enviado para o backend. Quando é reexibido no select de criação (`_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig`), é montado com `$('<option/>').val(label).text(label)` — `.text()` é seguro. No Twig, `aut_modal_tipo_options` é construído com `typeLabel` diretamente no HTML? Vejamos:
```twig
{% for typeLabel in aut_authorization_types|default([]) %}
{% if typeLabel %}
{% set aut_modal_tipo_options = aut_modal_tipo_options|merge([{
'value': typeLabel,
'text': typeLabel
}]) %}
```
Isso é usado no include de `_custom_select` que provavelmente escapa (Twig escapa por padrão com `{{ }}`). Então ok.
Na verdade, o tipo pode conter `<script>`? O Twig usa `|json_encode|raw` na aba settings:
```twig
var initialTypes = {{ aut_authorization_types|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
```
`json_encode` escapa strings com aspas duplas para JSON, então `<script>` dentro de string JSON não quebra — mas `</script>` em string JSON... sim, esse é o clássico problema: `json_encode` NÃO escapa `</script>` por padrão. Se um tipo contiver `</script><script>...`, isso quebraria o HTML e injetaria script. Porém, tipos são cadastrados apenas por gestores com permissão e são persistidos no banco; para serem exibidos aqui, precisariam ter sido inseridos por alguém com acesso. Stored XSS possível se um usuário com permissão de config inserir `</script>`. Mas como eles mesmos podem inserir, o vetor mais real é se esses dados vierem de outra fonte. É uma prática recomendada usar `json_encode` com `JSON_HEX_TAG` ou escapar. Vale a pena apontar como médio — XSS via injeção de `</script>` em tipos de autorização persistidos, quando renderizados com `|json_encode|raw` no template de settings e no template de criação? No template de criação, o select de tipos é montado no Twig com `{{ }}` (escapado). Então o XSS em potencial está em `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` — `var initialTypes = {{ aut_authorization_types|default([])|json_encode|raw }};` — e também `catalogMembers`, `catalogRoles`, `initialApprover*`. Todos são `json_encode|raw`. Nomes de membros podem ter `</script>`? Nomes são de usuários do sistema (não controlados diretamente?), mas podem ser gravados. Ainda assim, se um nome de membro contiver `</script>`, quebra. Isso é um problema clássico de Twig: usar `|json_encode|raw` sem `JSON_HEX_TAG`. Muitos codebases aceitam porque o próprio dado é razoavelmente confiável, mas na revisão devemos mencionar. Dado que tipos são digitados livremente por usuários via `addTypeChip` com quaisquer caracteres (exceto vazio) e persistidos, é um vetor plausível entre usuários com a mesma permissão, e também de exibição para todos que veem a aba. Vou classificar como médio/alto? O usuário do tipo com permissão poderia inserir algo como `<img src=x onerror=...>` num tipo, e isso seria renderizado em textContent, então não executa. O perigo é apenas se o tipo tiver `</script>` e aparecer no `json_encode|raw`, quebrando o script e permitindo injeção arbitrária. É um vetor real clássico. Vou listar como médio (XSS potencial via `json_encode|raw` sem `JSON_HEX_TAG` para dados que podem conter `</script>`).
Também no `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig` não aparece `json_encode` com dados do usuário… tem muitos `{{ ...|json_encode|raw }}` pré-existentes provavelmente. Mas dentro do diff não vejo injeção direta de HTML.
Outro ponto no `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig`: quando o tipo é adicionado e mais tarde exibido na lista de aprovadores/selects — sempre `textContent`. OK.
### Segurança CSRF (alto)
- `persist()` executa `window.jQuery.ajax({ url: SAVE_URL, method: 'POST', contentType: 'application/json', data: JSON.stringify(payload) })` **sem nenhum token CSRF** (header `X-CSRF-Token` ou campo `_token`). As regras dizem: "Toda mutação via formulário/AJAX envia `{{ csrf_token(...) }}` e o backend deve validar." Precisamos verificar o que o backend (`governance_authorization_config_save`) espera. Não temos o backend nesse grupo de arquivos (o controller está fora, mas a rota é chamada). Vale apontar como high: AJAX POST sem token CSRF — se o backend exigir, dará erro; se não exigir, é falha de segurança. Não temos o controller aqui, mas a prática exige CSRF. Deve-se verificar no controller. Vou colocar como alta prioridade (ou média já que não vemos o backend; mas as regras do usuário mandam sinalizar). Vou colocar high com verificação — descrever que a chamada AJAX não envia token CSRF e precisa confirmar se o endpoint valida; se não validar, é vulnerabilidade CSRF.
### Escopo/God template (alto pela regra de prioridade 1)
- `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` é um arquivo **novo com 1223 linhas**, sendo ~700 de CSS e ~500 de JS embutidos, tudo em um template Twig — exatamente o padrão "god template" que as regras mandam sinalizar com maior peso. Todo o tipo de lógica de tela (AJAX, manipulação DOM, picker) está num `<script>` de centenas de linhas dentro de um template, em vez de `public/js/`. E o `_modal_add_approver.html.twig` também tem ~360 linhas, ~200 das quais de CSS inline. Isso deve ser a primeira issue na lista (high) segundo as regras do usuário (God template — maior peso). E também `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig` já é gigante (2380+ linhas) e esta PR adiciona mais JS.
### Componentes existentes (atenção)
- O modal novo `_modal_add_approver.html.twig` e a busca/filtros criam componentes custom (chips, pills, search expandable, custom select) que podem duplicar `ui/_custom_select.html.twig`, `ui/_search_expandable.html.twig`, `ui/_pill.html.twig`, `_modal.html.twig` (este é usado via embed). O modal usa `_modal.html.twig` (bom). Mas o picker com busca/filtros é novo. É um alerta de baixa/média prioridade para avaliar reaproveitamento de componentes. Também `color-mix` em CSS pode não ser suportado em navegadores antigos (Edge < 111 etc.) — médio/baixo? Provavelmente o projeto já usa `color-mix`? Não sabemos. Vou ignorar ou mencionar leve.
### Comportamento / lógica (correctness)
Vários problemas potenciais:
#### a) Botão visualizar agora é exibido sem permissão de criação (ajuste de permissão?)
No `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig`, o `autActionsCell` antes era `[]` quando `ssmaCanCreateAuthorization` era false (não mostrava NENHUMA ação, nem visualizar). Agora o botão "Visualizar" é incluído sempre, independente da permissão. Isso pode ser intencional (visualizar não é editar). Mas pode ser uma mudança de permissão: usuários sem permissão de criar passam a poder abrir o modal de visualização da autorização. Se o modal de visualização usa o mesmo `applyAutCriarModalFields` e `setAutCriarModalReadonly(true)`, é só leitura, então provavelmente intencional para permitir visualizar. Ainda assim, vale checagem — mudança de comportamento fora do escopo? O resumo diz "listagem/edição lê..."; não menciona visualizar para todos. Vou colocar como médio: usuários sem permissão de criar/editar passam a ver o botão Visualizar; confirmar se é intencional e se o backend do modal de visualização carrega os dados novos (endpoint de detalhe atualizado para retornar `area_id`, `tipo`, `aprovador_id` etc.). O próprio `applyAutCriarModalFields` lê esses campos; se o endpoint não os retornar, a edição simplesmente não preenche. Precisamos verificar o JS que faz fetch dos dados da autorização — não aparece nesse diff (provavelmente pré-existente). O risco: o endpoint de detalhe da autorização usado ao clicar em editar/visualizar pode não ter sido atualizado para devolver os campos novos, logo o modal de edição não vai mostrar área/tipo/aprovador salvos. O resumo do autor diz "Editar uma autorização e conferir se área, tipo e aprovadores voltam preenchidos no modal" — então o backend deve ser da branch anterior (`feature/cc-auth-config-model`) que já lê. Como o controller não está no grupo, devemos verificar. Vou listar como médio: confirmar contrato com o endpoint de detalhe/edição (fora do grupo) quanto aos campos novos.
#### b) `ensureAutCriarSelectOption` — option dinâmico e opção `:first` removida
Em `ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes`, faz `$select.find('option:not(:first)').remove();` — assume que o primeiro `<option>` é o placeholder "Selecionar o tipo". OK. E remove as options do `.custom-modern-options` e recria. Mas vale observar que o placeholder option é mantido. OK.
#### c) Tipos antigos inválidos no select após refresh
Quando o usuário está editando uma autorização com tipo "X" e os tipos de config mudam (X removido), `ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes` reseta o select para vazio, mas o valor antigo `autCriarTipo` pode ter sido setado... A função lida: se current não existe em labels, `resetAutCriarCustomSelect('autCriarTipo', '')`. Isso limpa um valor que talvez fosse o da autorização em edição. Edge case menor — não vou listar ou coloco baixo.
#### d) Leitura de `tipo` como string — valor de option e payload
O tipo é livre; no `_custom_select`, options usam `value: typeLabel`. No submit: `tipo = readAutCriarSelectValue('autCriarTipo')`. Será `String(...)`. Envia string. OK.
Mas cuidado: `readAutCriarSelectId` = parseInt para `area_id`, `aprovador_id`, `aprovador_role_id`, `responsavel_id`. OK.
E os valores lidos na edição: `var tipo = aut.tipo || aut.tipo_autorizacao || '';` e `ensureAutCriarSelectOption('autCriarTipo', tipo, tipo)`. OK. Porém, `aut.tipo` pode vir como array? Não.
#### e) HTML `select` oculta vs custom select — `autCriarTipo` é um select real (renderizado pelo custom select include). O include `_custom_select` cria um `<select>` real escondido e uma UI. O botão submit lê `$('#'+...).val()`. OK.
#### f) Campos obrigatórios: responsável ainda é obrigatório? No diff, o hint diz "Aprovador membro/cargo opcionais", e a validação continua exigindo `responsavelId`. Mas o resumo de negócio diz que para a *demanda* (autorização do colaborador) o responsável é obrigatório e o aprovador da autorização é opcional? Há dois conceitos: "Responsável" (responsavel_id) e "Aprovador da Autorização" (aprovador_id). O modal tem ambos. OK, responsável obrigatório permanece.
#### g) `setAutCriarModalReadonly` desabilita selects custom — para visualizar; mas o botão de edição também usa etc. OK.
#### h) O cliente deve persistir tipos imediatamente, com debounce 400 ms sem verificar se o usuário saiu da página → perda de último save se ele digitar Enter e navegar/atualizar em menos de 400 ms. Também a cada chip adicionado/removido dispara `scheduleSave` que chama `persist` 400ms depois. Se várias mudanças rápidas, o timer é resetado, ok. Mas se o usuário fecha a aba antes, perde. Médio/baixo. Edge case.
#### i) Semáforo de salvamento: não há indicador de "salvando/salvo"; falhas são toast. OK.
#### j) `skipSave` inicialização e chamadas de `scheduleSave` durante hidratação
`hydrateAssignments` chama `addApproverRow(..., silent = undefined)`. Vejamos `addApproverRow(kind, id, name, allAreas, areaKeys, silent)`: `if (!silent) { scheduleSave(); }`. Quando chamado em `hydrateAssignments`, o argumento `silent` é `undefined` → falsy → `scheduleSave()` é chamado. Mas `skipSave` é true nesse momento (só fica false no final), e `scheduleSave` retorna cedo se `skipSave`. Então OK... mas `setRowAreas` dentro de `addApproverRow` pode chamar `scheduleSave`? Não, `setRowAreas` não chama. `syncAllApproverAreaSelects` também não. E o `(initialTypes || []).forEach(addTypeChip)` — `addTypeChip` chama `scheduleSave`, mas `skipSave` true. OK. Depois `syncApproverMode()` chama `scheduleSave` — `skipSave` ainda true na ordem? A ordem: forEach addTypeChip; hydrateAssignments; syncApproverMode; skipSave=false. Sim, tudo com skipSave true. OK. Porém `syncApproverMode` força `useMembers.checked = true` se ambos desligados e chama `scheduleSave` (skipSave true). No final, quando o usuário desliga os dois, Membros volta. OK.
`initialApproverMembers` e `hydrateAssignments` chamam `addApproverRow` com allAreas = `item.all_areas !== false`. Se `all_areas` é false e `area_keys` ausente/vazio → `setRowAreas(row, false, [])` → como areaKeys vazio, define allAreas true. OK.
`setRowAreas(row, allAreas !== false, areaKeys || [])`: cuidado com `allAreas` sendo `0` (número) de `all_areas: 0` do backend — `0 !== false` é true (porque `0 !== false` compara tipos diferentes e 0 é number, false boolean) → trataria all_areas=0 como true (todas áreas). Mas o backend provavelmente envia booleano JSON true/false. `all_areas !== false` com false → false. OK. Com 0 → true (bug potencial se backend enviar 0/1 como int). Baixo.
#### k) Persistência `/governance/authorizations/config` — endpoint chamado no template de settings. Rota definida em `config/routes_governance.yaml` (não incluída). Um ponto: o AJAX usa `{{ path(...) }}` ok.
#### l) `use_members`/`use_roles` flags: se o usuário desligar membros e deixar só cargos, ok. O backend pode exigir pelo menos um. O template garante que membros volta. Mas se o usuário desligar os dois e salvar, o client força Membros ativo. O resumo diz isso como regra esperada. OK.
#### m) Edição: o botão visualizar sempre presente com `ssmaCanCreateAuthorization` false — na coluna de ações montada dinamicamente via macro `ssma-aqc-table-action-btn`... a macro pode ter comportamento de tooltip. OK.
#### n) Índice `index.html.twig`: nova aba dentro de `{% if ssmaCanManageConfig|default(false) %}` — a mesma condição tem uma div content extra adicionada logo após `tab_auth_requisitos_content`. Vejamos o diff:
```
{% if ssmaCanManageConfig|default(false) %}
...
style="display:...">
{% include ..._tab_authorizations_config.html.twig %}
</div>
+
+ <div id="tab_auth_configuracoes_content" ...>
+ {% include '.../_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig' %}
+ </div>
{% endif %}
```
Sim, dentro do if. Ok.
O array de tabs: adiciona o novo tab apenas se ManageConfig. A div conteúdo id `tab_auth_configuracoes_content` inserida dentro do if e antes do `{% endif %}`. Aparentemente ok. Mas a pergunta: a nova tab é exibida para quem tem `ssmaCanManageConfig`, mesmo sem `ssmaCanManagePermissions`? Sim, coerente com a regra de negócio.
E o `defaultAutTab` switch JS — existe prévio. O conteúdo de `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` inclui o modal `_modal_add_approver.html.twig` e também `_tab_authorizations_settings` tem um `<script>` com IIFE — ótimo. Mas o `govAuthAddApproverModal` é movido para body via lista em index.html.twig (no diff foi adicionado à lista de modais). Porém o modal é incluído DENTRO de `_tab_authorizations_settings`, que está num painel com `display:none` se não é a aba ativa? Na verdade a div `tab_auth_configuracoes_content` só é `display:block` quando defaultAutTab é configurações; mas como os modais são movidos para o body, ok.
#### o) Duplicação de CSS em diversos templates: `_modal_add_approver.html.twig` e `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` definem `.gov-auth-settings-chip` etc. repetidamente. O CSS do modal add approver duplica várias regras de chip que já estão no template pai. Quando o modal é movido para o body (pelo script em index.html.twig), o CSS embutido no modal **vai junto**? Se o modal é movido para o body via JS, o `<style>` DENTRO do modal vai junto (continua valendo, pois style vale globalmente enquanto no DOM). A duplicação é inofensiva, mas as regras de `#governance_auth_settings_content .chip` não afetam o modal (modal está fora do content), por isso o modal define as próprias regras `.gov-auth-settings-chip` sem prefixo... Na verdade o modal usa regras `.gov-auth-picker-*` e `#govAuthAddApproverModal .gov-auth-settings-chip`. E as chips criadas por `createChip` sem prefixo de escopo dentro do picker (chips na área da linha) — o CSS `#govAuthAddApproverModal .gov-auth-settings-chip` é específico. OK. Preocupação menor de manutenção.
Um ponto importante: o modal `_modal_add_approver` define `#govAuthAddApproverModal.modal { z-index: 1200 !important; }`. Por que elevado? Para sobrepor outros elementos. OK.
#### p) Botão submit com "Adicionar Aprovador" e seleção de checkboxes — se o usuário marcar uma linha que depois é filtrada (não visível), `submitPicker` seleciona `pickerBody.querySelectorAll('tr[data-id]')` com checkbox marcado mesmo se a linha estiver oculta (display:none) — ou seja, seleciona itens ocultos por filtro também. Pode ser intencional? Geralmente quando você filtra e o item oculto está marcado, ele permanece marcado e será adicionado — comportamento um pouco estranho mas aceitável. `syncPickerCheckAll` considera apenas visíveis, então "select all" não marca ocultos, mas marcar individualmente e depois filtrar... O checkbox permanece. Ao submeter, inclui. Edge case baixo.
#### q) Área de aplicação por linha no picker: a linha marcada, mas com área editada (não "Todas"), `data-all-areas` reflete. `submitPicker` usa `allAreas = row.getAttribute('data-all-areas') !== '0'`. `setPickerRowAreas` seta para '1' ou '0'. OK.
#### r) No addApproverRow normal (fora do picker), o "person chip" é removível com `data-kind` e `data-id`; row.remove e salva. OK.
#### s) `fillAreaSelect` desabilita o select se não há tipos — mas nos approver rows existentes (`syncAllApproverAreaSelects`), quando o último tipo é removido, `row.getAttribute('data-all-areas') !== '1'`: `kept` vira [] e `setRowAreas(row, true, [])` (volta para Todas as Áreas). OK. Para rows com `data-all-areas='1'`, `rebuildApproverAreaSelect(row)` → `fillAreaSelect` desabilita select. OK.
#### t) Tipos duplicados case-insensitive, acentos? `labelKey` faz lowercase, mas não normaliza acentos — "Área" vs "area" são considerados diferentes. É ok, não é bug.
#### u) E o **contrato do endpoint de config save**: resposta `{ success, authorization_types, approver_members }`. O JS espera `res.authorization_types`. Se res for false? Se o backend retornar somente `{success:true}` sem arrays, o refresh usa `payload.authorization_types` — bom fallback. Para `approver_members`: `window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers(res.approver_members || payload.approver_members)` — mas `ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers` é um **stub vazio** em `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig`. Isso significa que ao salvar config, os aprovadores padrão... não precisam atualizar outra aba. A função vazia é proposital. Mas o fato de declarar uma função vazia que sugere atualizar default approvers do modal de criação — o modal de criação não usa default approvers atualmente. A chamada `persist()` invoca `ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers` passando array, mas ela não faz nada. Sem impacto, mas código morto/enganoso. Baixo (manutenção). A menos que seja esperado que o modal de criação reflita default approvers (ex: quando nenhum aprovador é informado, a demanda usa padrões — mas isso é regra **backend**, não UI). Então o stub existe para uma futura atualização... é inofensivo, mas nota de baixa prioridade.
#### v) **Descrição movida de obrigatória?** Continua obrigatória (validação). Hint textual "aut-criar-aprovador-hint" com regra de negócio: "Se nenhum for informado, a demanda usa os aprovadores padrão das Configurações." Isso é backend.
#### w) `_modal_authorization_form`: Na criação, o novo layout coloca "Área Responsável" e "Responsável" lado a lado? Na verdade atenção ao layout: O bloco `.aut-criar-modal-row` 1: área + responsável. Depois outro row com aprovador e cargo aprovador. Depois tipo. Depois requisitos. Depois descrição. Depois contractor reqs escondido. Mudou.
Precisamos confirmar que `aut_modal_area_options` e `aut_modal_tipo_options` estão disponíveis — são setados no template do modal a partir de `aut_company_areas`, `aut_authorization_types`, `allMembers`, `aut_company_roles`. Essas variáveis vêm do controller/hub (fora do grupo). Se o modal de criar/editar é incluído também em outras páginas (fora do hub) que não setam essas variáveis, os defaults `|default([])` evitam erro. Então os selects ficarão vazios. É robusto.
Porém: **o modal de criação de autorização é incluído em outras telas para mais permissões?** A descrição diz que o hub injeta tipos/aprovadores/cargos. O modal `_modal_authorization_form.html.twig` é usado apenas na aba create. Ok.
#### x) IMPORTANTE — criação/edição com tipo: `ensureAutCriarSelectOption` adiciona option ao select e ao `.custom-modern-options`; e setAutCriarSelectValue depois. Ao **editar** uma autorização cujo tipo não está mais cadastrado na config, `ensureAutCriarSelectOption` adiciona esse tipo antigo ao select para que o valor volte. Se o usuário salvar sem alterar, manda o tipo antigo (não cadastrado). O backend aceita? Regra: tipos vêm da config mas autorizações antigas mantêm o tipo. Aceitar deve ser OK. Porém ao reabrir a config, o tipo antigo não aparece (não está entre currentTypes) — então se você salvar, o backend pode rejeitar tipo desconhecido. Edge case. Médio/baixo.
#### y) O input de tipos: o usuário digita e dá Enter. E se digitar 80 caracteres com aspas e salvar — validação de comprimento `maxlength=80` ok. E se digitar um tipo que contenha `|`? `data-teams` usa `|` separator e `split('|')`; mas tipos names são usados em `data-area-key`, chips `data-type` — usam labelKey (lowercase). OK. E **tipos duplicados no backend**: o JS só evita duplicados localmente considerando tipos na config carregada. Se dois usuários, cada um numa aba, adicionam "Segurança" simultaneamente... o segundo save sobrescreve tudo (config inteira é substituída). Salvar a config inteira por vez apresenta condição de corrida — mas como cada config por empresa com apenas um gestor por vez, baixo. Ainda assim, **payload replace inteiro**: o POST manda todos os tipos e aprovadores; o backend deve substituir. Não é incremental — se dois navegadores abertos, um sobrescreve o outro. Risco de perda de dados baixo/médio (concorrência), mas dado UI provavelmente aceitável.
#### z) Grande problema potencial: **`.done(function (res) { if (!res || !res.success) { notifyError(...); return; } ...`. Se a resposta for 200 com corpo texto não-JSON, `res` string → `!res.success` true → mostra erro. OK.
#### aa) CSRF novamente: a rota de save e a rota de criação de autorização — a criação usa formulário? O `#btnSalvarAdicionarAut` provavelmente faz AJAX para endpoint com token. Não vemos o AJAX de salvar autorização no diff (pré-existente). Não vou tocar.
#### bb) **Permissão/abertura do botão Visualizar para quem não pode criar** — precisa confirmar se dados sensíveis são expostos no modal via endpoint de visualização; se o endpoint retorna dados completos da autorização a usuários sem permissão de gerenciar, pode ser vazamento? Mas visualizar não é necessariamente proibido. Verificar a política. Médio.
#### cc) Em `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig`, a mudança:
```js
AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS = ['autCriarArea', 'autCriarResponsavel', 'autCriarAprovador', 'autCriarAprovadorRole', 'autCriarTipo'];
```
depois `autoCompleteAutCriar`? Há um trecho removido que antes lia apenas responsavelVal e agora lê todos os selects — dentro de um handler de "algo" (provavelmente depois de popular via autocomplete). Ok.
E o reset de formulário limpa os 5 selects; ok.
Mas `setAutCriarModalReadonly(readonly)` desabilita também `autCriarArea`, `autCriarAprovador`, etc. Para o **modo visualizar**, `disabled` evita mudanças, mas o value dos selects custom ainda mostra? Deve.
#### dd) Modal de visualizar/editar dispara `applyAutCriarModalFields(aut)` com dados do backend que podem incluir `area_name`/`area` etc. Isso presume que o endpoint de detalhe já retorna esses campos. Se endpoint não atualizado (está fora deste grupo de review), os campos novos ficam vazios na edição. E como o botão Visualizar foi liberado, isso afeta mais gente. → Verificar em arquivos PHP/rotas fora do grupo: controller da autorização, entidade, serialização. Vou incluir verificação via code_search/file_read em arquivos como `src/Controller/.../GovernanceController.php` ou similar.
#### ee) **Estilos com `color-mix`** e `:has(~)` suporte broad — `:has()` é usado em CSS (`.aut-criar-modal-select-wrap:has(select.is-invalid)`) — suportado a partir de Chrome 105, Safari 15.4, Firefox 121. Dependendo do navegador suportado pelo produto, pode quebrar. Baixo (muito provavelmente aceito no projeto).
#### ff) CSS `pointer-events: none` e `disabled` — opção.
#### gg) `modal_fixed_width: '720px'`, tabela com overflow etc. — visual.
#### hh) **`BOND_LABELS = { clt: 'CLT', terceiro: 'Terceiro' }`** — os valores gravados no banco podem ser outros (ex: 'CLT', 'PJ', 'terceirizado', 'aprendiz' etc). Se houver mais vínculos possíveis, filtros/catálogo mostrarão vazio — filtro de vínculo: `bondLabel(member.employment_bond)` retorna '' para vínculos não mapeados, e o filtro não listará esses. Mas como o valor do filtro é derivado dos membros, o select simplesmente não inclui vínculos desconhecidos, então não filtra errado; contudo `applyPickerFilters` nunca casa vínculo desconhecido porque item.bond vira '' → `bondLabel('')` = '', filtro vazio -> match? Se o usuário escolhe o placeholder vazio '' ok. Se nenhum vínculo mapeado, fillFilterSelect cria apenas placeholder. OK. Baixo.
#### ii) **Estado global `window.ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes`**: definido dentro do `_tab_authorizations_create` script. A aba settings é incluída apenas se `ssmaCanManageConfig`; a aba create também existe só com permissão de visualizar/criar? Se o usuário tem `ssmaCanManageConfig` mas a aba de criação/listagem... Se a aba create não estiver na página (por exemplo, usuário sem permissão para ver a aba Criar? que permissão é `ssmaCanViewAuthorization`?), `ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes` não existirá; o `persist()` checa `typeof window.ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes === 'function'`, então ok.
#### jj) **Título e descrição**: o modal de autorização agora é o responsável por criar/editar; o texto "Criar autorização" etc. ok.
#### kk) A aba Configurações usa elementos com prefixo `gov-auth-*`. Existe já algum CSS global `.gov-auth-settings-chip`? Na verdade no CSS do modal e do settings há duplicação com escopos.
#### ll) Sobre o arquivo que subtraiu 1 linha em `SsmaAutomationService.php` — está fora do review; ignorar.
#### mm) Verificação de rotas e permissão do endpoint: A UI da aba Configurações é visível se `ssmaCanManageConfig`, mas o POST endpoint valida? Não temos o PHP. Podemos sugerir verificação.
#### nn) AJAX javascript: `window.jQuery.ajax` mas referenciam jQuery diretamente (`$` não usado no arquivo settings, usam `window.jQuery`); pode haver caso onde jQuery não carregado? Provavelmente carregado.
#### oo) **Modal com `data-dismiss="modal"` — padrão bootstrap** ok.
#### pp) `autocomplete="off"` ok.
#### qq) **No modal add approver, o clique na linha para toggle do checkbox**: há handler `pickerBody.addEventListener('click'...)` que, se clicar em qualquer célula (fora do checkbox / fora da área), alterna checkbox. Mas se clicar no select da area, `event.target.closest('.gov-auth-picker-area')` retorna truthy → return, ok. E o pill button tem `preventDefault` e `stopPropagation`. OK.
#### rr) **Ao remover chip de área na linha do picker**: `setPickerRowAreas(row, false, collectAreaKeys(row), true)`. Se remover o último chip (específico) e não havia pill "Todas Áreas", fica `is-editing` com nenhuma área selecionada; se o usuário submeter com linha marcada, `collectAreaKeys(row)` vazio e `allAreas=false` → no `submitPicker`, `allAreas = row.getAttribute('data-all-areas') !== '0'`. Depois de `setPickerRowAreas(row,false,[])` — cuidado: `setPickerRowAreas` no início: se `allAreas=false` e areaKeys vazio, ele converte para allAreas=true (`if (allAreas || areaKeys.length === 0)`) → seta `data-all-areas=1` e remove is-editing. Hmm, no click do remove chip: `chip.remove(); setPickerRowAreas(row, false, collectAreaKeys(row), true);`. `collectAreaKeys(row)` retorna [] depois de remover o chip; então `setPickerRowAreas(row, false, [], true)` — allAreas=false e areaKeys vazio → o código converte allAreas=true, adiciona chip Todas as Áreas e remove `is-editing` (porque keepSelectOpen só é usado no ramo allAreas... na verdade:
```js
if (allAreas && !keepSelectOpen) {
wrap.classList.remove('is-editing');
} else if (!allAreas) {
wrap.classList.add('is-editing');
}
```
com keepSelectOpen true e allAreas true → primeiro if `allAreas && !keepSelectOpen` é false → nada. Então permanece is-editing? Mas como allAreas é true, wrap não tem classe is-limited, e o select está mostrando... CSS `.is-editing .area-select { display:inline-block }`. Ficou aberto o select, sem chips "area" mas com estado... hmm: com allAreas true, deveria mostrar o pill "Todas as Áreas" em vez do select; mas is-editing true mostra o select. O select continua aberto com opção Todas as Áreas. Comportamento um pouco esquisito mas não crítico. E o data-all-areas=1, ok na submissão. Não vou listar.
#### ss) No modal add approver, o evento `blur` com `capture: true` pode atrapalhar, mas timeout 120.
#### tt) **CSS duplicativo no arquivo de settings**: 1223 linhas para uma aba — realmente. Referente à regra de god template, devo sinalizar como a primeira issue high: lógica de tela em `<script>` dentro de template em vez de `public/js/`. Além disso, este template novo é enorme e difícil de testar/manter.
#### uu) **O modal add approver usa `color-mix`** sem fallback para navegadores velhos. Não vou listar.
#### vv) `createChip(label, key, extraAttrs, removable)` — quando cria chip com `removable !== false`, o botão remove é inserido; no caso do person chip no approver row, o removeBtn tem `innerHTML = '<i class="fas fa-times"...'` — sem dados do usuário, ok.
#### ww) Um possível problema de XSS: `removeBtn.setAttribute('aria-label', 'Remover ' + label)` — label pode conter aspas; `setAttribute` é seguro (texto vira atributo com escapes). O valor é texto, não HTML. OK.
#### xx) Armazenamento de tipos no DOM `data-area-key` sem sanitização — usado em `createChip(key, 'area:' + labelKey(key), { 'data-area-key': key }, true)` — novo label inserido como textContent; ok.
#### yy) **JSON encode no Twig com `raw` é o ponto principal de XSS** que vou levantar. Examinar quantos: `initialTypes`, `initialApproverMembers`, `initialApproverRoles`, `catalogMembers`, `catalogRoles` — 5 ocorrências com `|json_encode|raw`, todas suscetíveis a `</script>` (famoso). Além disso, strings podem conter `&`, `U+2028`, etc. Usar `json_encode` com opções `JSON_HEX_TAG|JSON_HEX_AMP|JSON_HEX_APOS|JSON_HEX_QUOT` é mandatório para dados não confiáveis. Em Twig `|json_encode` não aceita flags adicionais facilmente (json_encode(constant...)). Muitos projetos simplesmente provêem filtro custom. Dado que os nomes/tipos podem ser digitados por usuários (tipos) e nomes/emails por membros (endereços de e-mail com caracteres especiais podem conter...?), o risco real. Vou tornar isso uma issue de segurança, provavelmente média/alta. Vou marcar como alta? Se o tipo de autorização for definido por um gestor e depois visualizado por outros gestores da mesma empresa, o vetor requer dois usuários, um malicioso com permissão de config. Mas o risco de stored XSS no contexto admin ainda é alto (pode escalar para admin). Vou classificar como **alta (XSS)** na verdade: `</script>` dentro de string JSON escapa o bloco de script, permitindo injeção arbitrária de HTML/JS na página — qualquer usuário que consiga cadastrar um tipo (gestor de config) pode executar script no contexto de outro gestor. É um vetor de stored XSS. Sim, alta.
Espera: os templates rodam com Twig; `{{ aut_authorization_types|default([])|json_encode|raw }}` — no PHP, `json_encode` por padrão não escapa `/`, `<`, `>`, `&`, `'`... só aspas duplas. Então `["</script><script>alert(1)</script>"]` vira `["<\/script><script>alert(1)<\/script>"]`? Não! `json_encode` escapa `/` como `\/`? Na verdade, `json_encode` por padrão NÃO escapa barras — a flag `JSON_UNESCAPED_SLASHES` é default? Vamos lembrar: por padrão, `json_encode` ESCAPE slash? O PHP `json_encode` escapa barras por padrão? Checando memória: `json_encode('/')` retorna `"\/"` por padrão — sim, o PHP escapa barras (`\/`) por padrão, e `JSON_UNESCAPED_SLASHES` remove esse escape. Com `<\/script>`, o parser JSON interpreta `\/` como `/`, e o HTML não vê `</script>` (porque tem backslash). Então... o ataque clássico com `</script>` é mitigado SE o PHP escapar barras. Sim, de fato `json_encode` escapa `/` como `\/` por padrão no PHP. Então `"</script>"` vira `"<\/script>"` — quando o HTML parser processa o bloco script, ele procura `</script>` literal, e como o texto contém `<\/script>`, não quebra. Portanto o vetor `</script>` via json_encode no PHP é mitigado por padrão, a menos que o código passe `JSON_UNESCAPED_SLASHES` para o json_encode. Em Twig, `|json_encode` não passa essa flag (usa padrão), então barras escapadas, então OK. Isso reduz o risco XSS via `</script>`.
Porém, `</script>` ainda pode ser contornado com caracteres como `\u2028`? Não quebra o script. U+2028 (line separator) pode quebrar JavaScript string? JSON encode do PHP escapa U+2028? Por padrão sim: `json_encode("\u2028")` => `"\u2028"` literal? Na verdade, JSON permite `\u2028`; e o JS moderno aceita U+2028 fora de strings? U+2028 dentro de string JS é válido desde ES2019. ok. E o HTML script: mesmo `<!--` etc. não quebram porque dentro de `<script>`, `</script>` é o único terminator. Com slash escapado, ok. E `<script>`? Para iniciar um script block o browser procura `</script>`. Portanto json_encode padrão PHP torna seguro contra `</script>`.
Então XSS via `json_encode|raw` é mitigado pela flag padrão? Devemos confirmar se o Symfony Twig `json_encode` filter usa `JSON_HEX_TAG` etc.? O filtro Twig `json_encode` chama `twig_jsonencode_filter`: usa `json_encode($value, $options)`, onde options = `JSON_PRETTY_PRINT` ou... Por padrão, options é `0`? Não: Twig escolhe options `JSON_HEX_TAG | JSON_HEX_APOS | JSON_HEX_AMP | JSON_HEX_QUOT` quando `constant('JSON_PRETTY_PRINT')`? Hmm! Na verdade, o filtro `json_encode` do Twig usa por padrão `JSON_HEX_TAG | JSON_HEX_APOS | JSON_HEX_AMP | JSON_HEX_QUOT` — é uma proteção automática! Deixa-me lembrar: Em Twig, `{{ data|json_encode }}` é seguro para HTML porque Twig usa `twig_jsonencode_filter` que por padrão passa opções `JSON_HEX_TAG | JSON_HEX_APOS | JSON_HEX_AMP | JSON_HEX_QUOT`? Sim! O Twig adiciona essas flags por padrão (por isso o htmlspecialchars para JSON). Vou confirmar da memória: `twig_jsonencode_filter($value, $options = 0)` — options default é `0`?? Não. O código do Twig:
```php
function twig_jsonencode_filter($value, $options = 0)
{
if ($options & JSON_PRETTY_PRINT) { ... }
return json_encode($value, $options);
}
```
e nos templates, `json_encode` passa `options` normal... e o autoescape? Não, o filtro não escapa. Muitos recomendam usar `json_encode` sem `|raw`; quando usado dentro de atributo ou script com `|raw`, o Twig não aplica flags extras. Apenas o componente `Serializer`...
Vou lembrar de verdade: O Twig core extension `json_encode` filter implementation:
```php
public function jsonEncode($value, $options = 0)
```
? Sim, e no template, se não passar options e não houver autoescape... não há adição de flags. Então depende do PHP `json_encode` default. Ainda assim, para ser seguro, o PHP escapa `/` como `\/`? Confirmando: `json_encode("</script>")` → `"<\/script>"`. Sim, PHP escapa barras por padrão (slashes) — sem JSON_UNESCAPED_SLASHES. Então não é trivial quebrar. Ainda é boa prática apontar. Mas a severidade é menor. Posso listar como médio/baixo mencionando que embora o json_encode do PHP escape `/` por padrão, recomenda-se `JSON_HEX_TAG`/não confiar apenas no escape de barras (defense in depth). Juntar com uma nota sobre dados de usuários em `data-*`? data-* são setAttribute e textContent, ok.
Outro vetor de XSS é nos atributos de dados: `row.setAttribute('data-teams', (item.team_names || []).join('|'))`. Nome de time pode conter `|`, atrapalhando o filtro (`split('|')`) e exibição não. Não XSS, mas bug de filtro se nome de time contiver `|`. Baixo.
E `avatarColor` etc.
Então manterei XSS como médio com verificação recomendada (padrões do projeto quanto a `|json_encode|raw`), já que não está 100% explodido, mas devemos recomendar `JSON_HEX_TAG`.
### Backend está fora; contratos
- Rota `governance_authorization_config_save` chamada sem CSRF visível → verificar no controller. Isso é uma questão forte de segurança. Como as rules do usuário dizem "Toda mutação via AJAX envia csrf_token e backend valida". Vou listar como alta: o POST AJAX em settings não envia token CSRF; se o backend não validar, qualquer site pode disparar POST para a rota e alterar config (CSRF application/json requer CORS preflight, mas uma form não pode enviar application/json; no entanto, fetch com `text/plain` pode... não, content-type é application/json; form não envia. CSRF é mitigado por application/json + necessidade de preflight CORS. Mas se o backend aceitar `application/x-www-form-urlencoded` ou se houver CORS permissivo... Ainda assim, o padrão do projeto exige CSRF, e se o backend validar CSRF o AJAX falhará sempre (funcionalidade quebrada) — porque não vemos o token sendo enviado. Portanto: ou o save não funciona (backend exige CSRF) ou não há proteção CSRF. Alto, verificar no PHP do endpoint.
### Verificação de csrf no modal de criação: O save de autorização via btnSalvarAdicionarAut provavelmente tem AJAX pré-existente com CSRF; nada novo.
### Avatar com CSS inline style background com cor gerada... ok.
### Testes
Os templates não têm testes. OK.
### `window.ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes` recria `<option>` via `.val(label)` com label, mas se label contiver aspas... seguro.
Vamos pensar na ordem de prioridades e montar o plano de revisão estruturado com Issues e chamadas de ferramentas (sem executar). Cada issue requer severidade, descrição 3 dimensões, e linhas → com tool guidance (intenção de chamada).
O formato: `Summary:` linha; depois `Issues`; depois itens numerados. Cada item:
```
1. [high] (descrição)
→ code_search (args) — motivo
→ file_read_diff (args) — motivo
```
Devemos descrever as chamadas de ferramenta — mas as ferramentas são "de referência, não executar; descrever intenção". Algumas issues podem não precisar de tool calls.
### Organizar Issues
Avaliando todas, monto uma lista:
**Issue 1 (high) — God template / JS e CSS gigantes dentro de template novo.** `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` (1223 linhas: ~1.100 de CSS/JS inline) e `_modal_add_approver.html.twig` (361 linhas) violam a regra de ouro: lógica de tela em blocos `<script>`/`<style>` dentro do Twig em vez de `public/js/`, dificultando manutenção, reuso, testes e aumentando o risco de regressão. Impacto em manutenibilidade/teste. → code_search por componentes existentes em `public/js/` (ex.: procurar `public/js/` com padrões de módulo de governança, buscar se há arquivos JS como `governance-authorization*.js`). Procurar por `window.jQuery.ajax` em templates para ver padrões onde JS é movido para arquivos. Sugerir mover para `public/js/governance/authorization-settings.js`.
**Issue 2 (high) — AJAX POST sem token CSRF.** `persist()` em `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` faz `window.jQuery.ajax({method:'POST', contentType:'application/json', data: JSON.stringify(payload)})` sem header/campo de CSRF. Consequência: ou o endpoint de config (`governance_authorization_config_save`) rejeita (funcionalidade quebrada) ou aceita sem validação de origem (vulnerabilidade CSRF) e fica fora do padrão do projeto. → verificar PHP controller da rota (code_search por `governance_authorization_config_save`, por `function configSave`, por `csrf_token`). Não temos o arquivo, mas descrever a busca.
**Issue 3 (high/médio) — Botão Visualizar liberado e contrato do modal de edição com campos novos.** No `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig`, o olhinho saiu do `{% if ssmaCanCreateAuthorization %}` e passou a aparecer para todos que veem a listagem. Isso muda quem consegue abrir o modal de visualização, e o `applyAutCriarModalFields` agora espera `area_id`/`tipo`/`aprovador_id`/`aprovador_role_id` no JSON de detalhe. Se o endpoint que alimenta esse modal não foi atualizado nesta PR/merge (está fora do grupo), os campos voltam em branco na edição/visualização. Impacto: vazamento? Não, é visualização. Quebra de funcionalidade de edição (volta vazio). → code_search para localizar o JS que abre modal (função de fetch) e o controller que retorna dados da autorização (ex.: `function.*autorizacao`, `find.*Autorizacao`, `aut_id`). Procurar no backend os campos novos no retorno de detalhe.
**Issue 4 (médio) — XSS/escape com `|json_encode|raw` para dados digitados/gravados.** `initialTypes`, `initialApproverMembers`, `initialApproverRoles`, `catalogMembers`, `catalogRoles` são embutidos com `|json_encode|raw`. Embora `json_encode` do PHP escape `/` por padrão, o projeto deveria confirmar padrão (e possivelmente usar flags como `JSON_HEX_TAG`) porque os tipos são texto livre digitado por gestores; qualquer mudança futura de flag (ex.: `JSON_UNESCAPED_SLASHES`) ou um caractere não previsto torna stored XSS. Também `window.ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes` usam `.text()` seguro, então ok. Vou classificar como médio-baixo? Se for alto gera alarme falso porque há mitigação padrão. Vou colocar **médio** (reforço/defesa).
Na verdade, há outro ponto mais concreto para XSS: `_tab_authorizations_create` `aut_modal_tipo_options` e mostra `typeLabel` como option value. Se `aut_authorization_types` não estiver (default []), ok. E o Twig autoescape protege. sem issue.
**Issue 5 (médio) — Persistência inteira com debounce de 400ms sem rascunho local / sem proteção contra perda na navegação; e concorrência entre abas.** Salvar toda a config (tipos+aprovadores) com debounce curto; se o usuário alterar e sair/trocar de aba antes do timer, perde alteração silenciosamente. Além disso, duas abas abertas podem sobrescrever uma à outra (config inteira substituída, sem versão). Impacto: perda de dados de configuração. → sem tool; ou code_search para ver se há pattern de autosave no projeto (ex.: `beforeunload`, `visibilitychange`). Talvez colocar em "médio". Em várias UIs autosave com debounce já é padrão; perde se sair antes de 400ms — caso raro. Vou colocar como médio (ou baixo). Tenho que escolher. É edge case mas real.
**Issue 6 (médio) — Edição de autorização antiga com tipo removido da config pode persistir tipo fora da allowlist**; e se um tipo for removido da Configuração, autorizações existentes com esse tipo ficam "órfãs" na UI (o select da edição ganha a opção via ensure, mas o modal de criação não mostra mais o tipo). Sem migration/backfill, conforme documentado, é esperado que autorizações antigas mantenham o tipo; porém o modal ao salvar manda o tipo antigo e o backend pode aceitar (coluna) — sem problema. E o modal de visualização mostra. Portanto não é bug grave.
**Issue 7 (médio) — Componentes duplicados (alerta):** `_modal_add_approver.html.twig` reinventa um picker com busca, filtros, listagem com seleção — existem componentes/shared templates (`ui/_custom_select`, `ui/_search_expandable`, `ui/_member_profile_offcanvas`, `_modal_offcanvas` etc.). Segundo as regras, isso é alerta, não bloqueio. Vou colocar baixo/médio (atenção) perguntando se compensa extrair componentes. Como a regra do usuário diz: virar atenção mais séria se o componente é genérico o bastante (ex.: picker de membros com busca/filtros provavelmente existe em outros módulos?). Pesquisar se há picker de membros similar em `templates/components/` (arquivo de busca por membros). Vou colocar como médio-baixo? Vou colocar como low/medium.
A regra de prioridade de review do usuário não lista componentes como alta, apenas "alerta, não bloqueio". Então posso colocar como **low**.
**Issue 8 (médio/baixo) — Campos novos no modal de criação: variável `aut_company_areas`/`aut_company_roles`/`allMembers` etc. são injetadas pelo hub. O modal agora depende de novos parâmetros da view; se o template `_modal_authorization_form.html.twig` for usado em outro contexto que não o hub (outra rota com permissão de criar autorização), os selects nascem vazios e a criação fica impossível (área/tipo obrigatórios).** Verificar onde o modal é incluído. → code_search por `_modal_authorization_form` includes (templates que incluem), e verificar controllers que renderizam essas views para conferir população das variáveis.
**Issue 9 (baixo) — `ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers` stub vazio e chamada no persist** — código morto/enganoso (função vazia criada só para satisfazer chamada; se esperado atualizar algo, não faz). Baixo.
**Issue 10 (baixo/médio) — Duplicação de CSS chips/regras entre os dois templates novos** com prefixos diferentes; dificulta manutenção. Posso fundir com Issue 1 (god template) ou componente. Não criar muitas issues baixas.
**Issue 11 (médio) — `data-teams` join por `|` sem sanitização de nomes com pipe; filtros podem quebrar**; e `BOND_LABELS` limitado — filtro vínculo omite outros tipos. Baixo.
**Issue 12 (alto) — `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` é incluído dentro da div de conteúdo que pode estar `display:none` quando a aba não é ativa — não issue.
**Issue 13 — select custom na modal: ao adicionar opção dinamicamente `.custom-modern-options`; se o custom select component tiver busca própria, ok. Sem issue.
**Issue 14 — Leitura de `aut.tipo`**: se o backend retornar tipo em outro campo (ex. `tipo_autorizacao`), ok fallback. Sem issue.
**Issue 15 — Mudança de obrigatoriedade de descrição em ordem de checagem** inócua.
**Issue 16 — Validação `area_id` obrigatória nova — autorizações criadas por API/integração sem esse campo?** Se a entidade `member_autorizacao` tem coluna nova `area_id` e o backend exige, um integrador que cria sem área quebra. Backend fora do grupo. Verificar contrato no PHP. Podemos colocar: verificar no controller/serviço de save se `area_id` é obrigatório no backend e se jobs/fluxos legados (cópia de autorização, integrações) enviam esse campo. Médio. → code_search em `src/` por chamadas a `member_autorizacao`/criação de autorização para ver se há outros pontos de criação que não passam pelo modal.
Apesar de o diff ser twig, os riscos de contrato se concentram na camada PHP que não está no grupo — por isso as ferramentas são para verificar fora.
Quantidade de issues: devemos ser criteriosos, mas o arquivo novo é grande e há muitas questões. Vou selecionar as mais relevantes ~8-10 issues ordenadas por severidade.
Vou revisar o checklist System e User para não esquecer de áreas: Correctness, Security, Performance, Maintainability, Test.
### Performance
- Tabela settings carrega `catalogMembers`/`catalogRoles` inteiros para a página; pode ser pesado? Página já carrega allMembers? O modal de criação inclui allMembers também. Já existia... no hub, agora `_tab_authorizations_settings` também recebe `allMembers` e `aut_company_roles`. Pode duplicar payload. Baixo.
- `renderPickerRows` recria todas as linhas a cada abertura apenas; ok. `applyPickerFilters` loop sobre tr; para muitos membros (ex.: 5k) pode ser pesado. Filtros re-render. Baixo/médio — catálogo inteiro de membros da empresa em memória numa página; depois DT. Não vou incluir como issue própria. Mais relevante: **payload embutido de todos os membros** expõe PII (nome, email, cargo, times) a qualquer pessoa com permissão de ver a aba (gestor). Mas já devem ter permissão. Sem counts.
### Segurança de IDOR
Endpoint save substitui config inteira por company_id do usuário logado (presume). Sem backend. Verificar isolamento por empresa: se controller da config usa company do usuário. Fora do grupo; recomendar checagem. Vou adicionar na issue CSRF/backend: "confirmar que o controller deriva `company_id` da empresa do usuário e não confia em campo do payload."
### Separação `use_members`/`use_roles` e aprovers com tipo `role` incluído somente se `use_roles` estiver marcado.
### Vamos verificar novamente o diff do `_tab_authorizations_create` por um possível problema real de JS:
```js
AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS = ['autCriarArea', 'autCriarResponsavel', 'autCriarAprovador', 'autCriarAprovadorRole', 'autCriarTipo'];
...
function syncAutCriarSelectFromCustomUi(selectId) {
var $sel = $('#' + selectId);
if (!$sel.length) return;
...
if ($sel.prop('disabled')) return; // pre-existente?
```
não sabemos;
No `resetAutCriarModal` (função de reset dos campos):
```js
AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS.forEach(...);
$('#modalAdicionarAutTitulo').text('Criar Autorização');
```
ok.
No submit, payload:
```js
var payload = { titulo, descricao, requisitos, contractor_requirement_dependencies, responsavel_id, area_id, aprovador_id: aprovadorId || null, aprovador_role_id: aprovadorRoleId || null, tipo: tipo };
if (id) { payload.status = ...; }
```
ok. Como os valores `aprovadorId`/`aprovadorRoleId` vêm de `readAutCriarSelectId(...)` = parseInt, se vazio 0 → null. ok.
**Mas**: `readAutCriarSelectValue('autCriarTipo')` retorna string com trim. Se o select não tiver valor (placeholder), devolve ''. ok.
**E o tipo pode ter até 80 chars; validação não usa maxlength?** O custom select options vem de `aut_modal_tipo_options`, criado de aut_authorization_types vindos do backend/controller. Não há input livre no modal.
**E o sync de selects ocorre em btnSalvar: `AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS.forEach(syncAutCriarSelectFromCustomUi);` — mas se o usuário digitou um valor novo no `<select>` nativo hidden programaticamente... ok.
### No modal settings: Ao remover tipo que está sendo usado por aprovador com restrição de área, `syncAllApproverAreaSelects` remove restrição e volta para all. Na verdade se um aprovador tem `area_keys` específico que era um tipo X, e X é removido, `kept` = [] e `setRowAreas(row, true, [])`. Então o aprovador passa para "todas as áreas" automaticamente. Correto: não tem como limitar a um tipo que não existe.
### E se remover todos os tipos, `fillAreaSelect` do row mostra placeholder "Cadastre um tipo acima" e desabilita select; row continua com dados-all='1' e chip Todas as Áreas. OK.
### Criar tipó — ao pressionar Enter com `typeInput.value` vazio, addTypeChip retorna false; ok.
### Ao carregar com types duplicados? `addTypeChip` evita duplicatas. ok.
### `syncApproverMode`: Se backend envia `use_members: false, use_roles: false` (viés de dados antigos), `syncApproverMode` força Membros on **mas** não persiste até alguma mudança (chamadas `scheduleSave`; `skipSave` ainda true? No init, `syncApproverMode()` é chamado antes de `skipSave=false`, então scheduleSave retorna, e não há persistência da correção. Depois, qualquer mudança posterior salva. Se nada mudar, o backend continua com ambos false — mas a UI mostra membros ativo. Na próxima abertura, de novo forçado. Não grave; o autor dizia que "If both toggles turned off, Members should remain active after save" — presumo que somente quando usuário desliga ambos via UI uma mudança é disparada. Mas no load, se backend já tiver ambos false, a UI mostra Membros marcado, mas o backend não é atualizado — mismatch somente se o backend retornou estado inválido. Baixo.
### Vamos incluir essa? Não.
### Uma coisa real — **XSS na tab settings**: observe `personChip` da linha de aprovador: `removeBtn.setAttribute('aria-label', 'Remover ' + name);` ok.
### Outra: Na função `submitPicker`, nota que os aprovadores antigos (já adicionados) são ocultados da lista via `!hasApproverRow`, OK.
### Checagem da acessibilidade: ok.
Agora — há algum problema **com `index.html.twig`** que valha issue? A adição do modal id na lista `['govAuthAddApproverModal']` — ao mover para body. O CSS `#govAuthAddApproverModal.modal` style block está DENTRO do `_modal_add_approver`, e se mover o modal para o body, o `<style>` interno é movido junto (browser aplica style tags em qualquer lugar). OK.
Mas no template `_tab_authorizations_settings`, o modal inclui **outro embed de modal com `<style>`** CSS grande. Ao mover o modal para body, o `<style>` dentro dele permanece válido. Sem problema.
### Possível problema de duplicação de IDs
O modal add approver contém elementos de id `govAuthPicker*`, e a aba settings tem códigos. Como o modal pode ser incluído **toda vez que o tab settings é renderizado** (uma vez) — ok.
Wait: será que `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` é incluído em index apenas uma vez? Sim.
### As alterações em `_modal_authorization_form`:
No diff, eu vejo que o layout mudou para usar `aut-criar-modal-row` com 6 colunas agrupadas 2 a 2. Em telas pequenas, mudam para coluna. ok.
**Pontos notáveis no modal de formulário**:
- O campo contract req foi para `d-none`, mas o `aria-hidden="true"` e `class="d-none"`; o JS continua a resetar tags e valida? A validação do contract reqs provavelmente permanece pré-existente mas escondida. Não issue.
- A remoção do parágrafo de ajuda das dependências documentais (icone) ok.
- `.form-group` com `mb-0` + `d-none` etc.
**Um possível problema de UX/lógica:** A "Descrição" foi movida para baixo de requisitos, mas o label do requisito mudou de "Requisitos do colaborador" para "Requisito da autorização" — mudança de semântica que pode ser intencional. E o hint removido. Ótimo.
### Então, plano de issues final (ordenado por severidade):
1. **high — God template: `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` e `_modal_add_approver.html.twig` com ~1.500 linhas de CSS/JS no Twig; regra de peso máximo.** Descrição em pt simples. → code_search: procurar em `public/js/` por scripts de governança; e verificar templates similares (por ex., outros `_tab_authorizations_*.html.twig`) para propor extração.
2. **high — chamada AJAX de save sem token CSRF.** → code_search/php para a rota config save e validação CSRF.
3. **high/médio — endpoints/contrato de detalhe da autorização e permissões: botão visualizar para todos e campos novos dependem de backend fora da PR.** Hmm — é meio especulativo. A regra de revisão: "Se o template chama um endpoint alterado nesta mesma PR, confirme o contrato; endpoint que mudou sem atualizar templates é bloqueante." aqui é o contrário: template novo chama endpoint; precisamos verificar controller. Vou separar em duas issues:
3a. (médio/algo) — Visualizar sem permissão de criar (mudança de exposição). Vou descrever como questão de permissão: sem `ssmaCanCreateAuthorization`, antes nenhuma ação; agora o "olho" aparece. Usuários sem direito de criar/editar passam a carregar dados completos da autorização (que podem incluir requisitos do colaborador, dependências documentais, responsável) via modal. Confirmar se é intencional e qual permissão rege a visualização; se não há permissão separada para visualizar, isso pode expor informação a quem não deveria. → verificar controller/perms. Classificar **médio** (a menos que a permissão já cubra). Diria médio. Mas security: possível vazamento de dados. Vou manter médio-alto? Vou colocar **médio**.
3b. (médio) — `applyAutCriarModalFields` depende de campos novos no JSON de detalhe da autorização, e modal de criação depende de variáveis injetadas no hub — verificar todos os pontos de inclusão do modal/carregamento. → code_search por "applyAutCriarModalFields"/fetch da autorização e as variáveis. É da mesma família que issue 3a. Posso unificar? A Issue deve ser "O contrato com o backend não está no grupo" com duas facetas. Talvez unificar em uma issue medium: "Contrato com backend/perm/vars fora do diff não verificado — campos novos podem voltar vazios na edição/visualização e criação pode ficar impossível fora do hub". Não, devemos separar pois o impacto é diferente.
4. **médio — XSS defesa: `|json_encode|raw` sem flags extras; tipos são texto livre, e o payload via data atributtes safe.** Na verdade, considerando PHP default e Twig... vou manter como low/médio? Vou classificar medium porque tipos são input de usuário e regras do projeto proíbem `|raw` sem sanitização. Mas vou ser preciso quanto à mitigação. Melhor: **médio** (defesa em profundidade e risco se json_encode não escapar barras — alguns componentes Twig usam `JSON_UNESCAPED_SLASHES`? Não no filtro nativo). O filtro Twig nativo usa `json_encode($value, $options)` e a opção padrão é 0 → barras escapadas. Vou colocar **médio** mas com nuance sobre `|raw` próximo a `</script>`, recomendando escapar flag ou usar abordagem apropriada. Posso também recomendar sanitizar no input de tipos (ex.: proibir `<>&`? melhor permitir qualquer e tratar na saída). Como há backend da config nesta mesma PR? fora do grupo. A intenção da issue: verificar se o autoescape ocorre no contexto (script) e se há risco real no padrão do projeto.
Hmm... Quero uma issue de segurança forte mas defensável. Considere que temos XSS no modal de criação? O modal `aut_modal_aprovador_options` com `member.name|default('')` é renderizado com Twig autoescape e options `value: member.id`, `text: name` — escapado. OK.
Outra: No settings, há `role.id` etc. tudo server-rendered em JSON.
Objectively, XSS risk existe se `name` de membro contiver `</script>` e JSON não escapar. PHP json_encode default: testando mentalmente em php -r 'echo json_encode("</script>");' → `"<\/script>"`. Sim, retorna com slash escapado. Portanto não é executável. Se um time usar `|json_encode|raw` amplamente, é padrão seguro no PHP. Então a issue torna-se baixa/médio estilo "best practice" sobre sanitização de tipos (aceitar qualquer caractere de 80 incluindo `<script>` que será interpretado como texto — não executa).
Vou rebaixar para **low**? Não quero perder a segurança. Mas há outra entrada: `removeBtn.innerHTML = '<i class="fas fa-times"...'` fixo; `chip.textContent` seguro. `.html()` não é usado com dados. Então baixo. Em vez disso, criarei uma issue segurança **CSRF** (real) e uma **médio** sobre permissões do botão visualizar. Deixo a XSS como **baixo/médio** notando prática e validação backend: O texto de tipo aceito com 80 chars e sem filtro de caracteres; embora a exibição no template seja via textContent/escapada, esses valores vão aparecer também em outros pontos (ex.: select Twig escapado) — risco residual baixo; recomendar validação server-side de tipos (não permitir `<`, `>`, `&`, aspas? ou aceitar mas com boa saída). Posso colocar como baixo.
Ah, mas tem algo mais forte: as variáveis `allMembers` incluem **email**, gravados pelo usuário; `email` é usado em `nameWrap` via `textContent` — seguro.
Então XSS baixo.
5. **médio — Perda de alterações com autosave debounce e salvamento inteiro (substituição total) sem rascunho no `beforeunload`/bloqueio de troca** — quero tornar? Sim, médio. Prática comum: sempre manter um "Salvar" explícito ou `beforeunload`. Consequência: usuário adiciona tipos/aprovadores e navega rápido → perde tudo sem aviso. Vou colocar medium? Talvez low/medium. Vou colocar **médio**? Hmm, isso pode soar exigente demais. Mas o projeto já usa autosave em outras telas? Não sei. A issue pode ser "confirmar se o padrão autosave com rebounce existe e como outras telas lidam com saída; senão, considerar guardar no `beforeunload`."
Possivelmente usar em low/medium. Vou colocar **low**? Não. Prefiro classificar conforme a regra de severity: medium = edge-case problems. Sim, médio.
6. **médio — Isolamento por empresa e substituição total do config; CSRF e validação de permissão no backend fora do grupo; e validar se controller deriva company_id da sessão, não do payload.** Precisamos de verificação; issue pode ser medium: "O payload enviado não contém company_id, então presumo backend deriva da sessão — mas nada garante. A API de config não está no diff; todo o modelo não está." Como revisores de UI não vemos o controller, mas a feature branch inteira inclui o modelo. Isso é apenas verificação. Posso englobar na issue CSRF/backend e sugerir verificação de isolamento por empresa no controller via code_search, em vez de issue separada.
7. **médio — Outros pontos de criação de autorização fora do modal podem não enviar os novos campos obrigatórios** (se backend exige area/tipo, fluxos que criam autorização via SsmaAutomationService? O outro arquivo alterado `SsmaAutomationService.php` (-1 linha) sugere que existe automação SSMA criando autorizações!). Isto é interessante: SsmaAutomationService.php foi modificado nesta PR (embora fora do review), subtraindo 1 linha. Pode ser remoção de uso de variável. Então há automação que cria autorização? Não sabemos. Vou incluir issue medium pedindo verificação dos pontos que gravam `member_autorizacao`/autorização fora da UI para garantir consistência, dado que o modal agora envia 4 campos novos. → code_search por criação/persistência de autorização em `src/` (ex.: `MemberAutorizacao`, `->setArea`, `new Autorizacao`). E file_read_diff para SsmaAutomationService.php para ver o que foi alterado (mas o sistema só permite ver diff dos arquivos na list? A ferramenta file_read_diff de arquivo fora do grupo? A list "other_changed_files" inclui; ferramenta pode ler qualquer arquivo. Vou incluir na issue 7 linhas → file_read_diff para `src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php` — motivo: confirmar se a mudança fora do grupo afeta contrato. Mas a instrução said "Other files changed not in review group"; podemos consultar para verificação se necessário. Sim.
Mas cuidado: o escopo da análise é somente código novo/modificado. Análise de arquivo fora pode auxiliar. Posso usar nas tool calls.
8. **médio — Novo template settings inclui componentes custom (chips, picker) que poderiam ser componentes compartilhados existentes** — na verdade vou colocar o aviso "componentes novos vs existentes" como **low** para não inflar, mas a regra quer um alerta se equivalente existir, não bloqueio. Issue separada low: "Há componentes prontos (ex. `ui/_pill.html.twig`, `ui/_search_expandable.html.twig`, `ui/_member_avatars_stack`, offcanvas de perfil de membro, `_modal_offcanvas`) similares; avaliar reaproveitamento antes de manter mais um picker." → file_find/code_search em templates/components. (medium? conforme regra: alert leve; vou marcar low).
9. **low — stub `ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers` vazio** — código enganoso: a função é chamada com a lista de aprovadores após save, porém não atualiza nada; se a intenção for que a criação use padrões, está incompleto. Mas o backend trata; do ponto de vista UI, ok. low.
10. **low — `data-teams` usando `|` como separador sem escapar nomes que contêm `|`** e `employment_bond` com allowlist incompleta. low. Talvez não.
11. **low — `addTypeChip` aceita qualquer caractere (até `</script>`, `<`, etc.), sem normalizar aspas, para dados que depois são persistidos e renderizados fora de contextos HTML-safe? Não; mas será usado em `title`? Em config, os tipos aparecem no select Twig (escapado), nos data atributos do JS. ok. low.
12. **medium — CSS `color-mix` e `:has`** — compatibilidade browser. O projeto usa? Muitos dos CSS novos usam `color-mix()` e `:has()` (no modal de formulário pré-existente). Como decidimos? se o projeto suporta browsers modernos, ok. low.
Devemos limitar a ~10 issues com foco. A instrução não limita o número, mas devemos evitar ruído.
Acho que as issues mais fortes:
1. **high — lógica de tela gigante em templates (god-template)** (regra 1, maior peso)
2. **high — POST JSON sem CSRF token no autosave** (verificar backend; se backend valida, tudo quebra; se não, brecha)
3. **high?/medium — liberar Visualizar para todos e alterar ações da listagem** — vou ponderar. É UI de permissão; o autor pode ter querido isso (qualquer usuário com acesso à aba "Criar"? Na verdade sem `ssmaCanCreateAuthorization` mas com a permissão de ver a listagem "ssmaCanView?"). Os dados exibidos no modal de visualização podem ser sensíveis (requisitos do colaborador, empresa prestadora). Vou cravar **medio**, com verificação de backend.
Na verdade há mais um detalhe: se `ssmaCanCreateAuthorization` é falso, o botão visualizar aparece; mas o evento onClick de visualizar para abrir o modal e chamar endpoint de detalhe é tratado por JS pré-existente em _tab_authorizations_create; quando o modal abre em readonly, `setAutCriarModalReadonly(true)` existe. OK.
4. **médio — Dependência de contrato/dados novos no JSON do backend para edição/visualização e para populações das variáveis** — verificar `authorizationSave`/detalhe e inclusion points do modal além do hub. (Vou fundir com issue anterior? Não: uma é permissão; outra é contrato de dados. Mas é muito da mesma "não consigo ver backend".)
Ainda, no template settings: Ao recuperar a lista de autorizações na aba Criar `/editar`, `resolveAutCriarResponsavelId(aut)`:
```js
function resolveAutCriarResponsavelId(aut) {
if (aut && aut.responsavel_id) return aut.responsavel_id;
if (aut && aut.responsavel && aut.responsavel.id) return aut.responsavel.id;
if (aut && aut.autor && aut.autor.id) return aut.autor.id;
return '';
}
```
pré-existente? No diff há somente a chamada; função pré-existente. ok.
5. **médio — autosave, perda e concorrência**
6. **médio — SsmaAutomationService e outros fluxos fora do modal enviam campos obrigatórios?** (verificação)
7. **médio/baixo — `json_encode|raw` segurança/defesa** — vou colocá-lo como médio? Quero alinhar com a regra "XSS nunca use raw sem sanitização". Vou mantê-lo como **médio** dado que dados digitados por usuários são serializados dentro de `<script>` com `|raw`. Explicação: não estou confirmando exploit atual, mas padrão de risco; adicionalmente os tipos são livres e irão para o DOM. Vou incluir com code_search para ver outros exemplos e confirmar uso de filtro custom no projeto (ex.: `json_encode` com `constant('JSON_HEX_TAG')`).
8. **low — componentes existentes não reaproveitados / CSS duplicado**
9. **low — stub vazio ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers**
10. **low — separador `|` nos nomes e allowlist de vínculo** — talvez corte para evitar muitos itens. Posso manter porque cap 100? sem límite. Vou cortar alguns baixos para ficar mais forte: vou manter o stub? baixo real: o código declara função vazia mas chama com dados; se a intenção era sincronizar default approvers no modal de criação — não existe tal UI (o modal de criação não mostra aprovadores default). Funcionalidade não prometida na UI, então ok. low.
Vou incluir 9 issues.
Espera — preciso revisar se o AJAX de criação de autorização (btnSalvarAdicionarAut) já existia e envia... não está no diff; não vou criticar.
### Questão: "git diff mostra templates apenas; o checklist pede para rever migrations, php etc." Mas estamos num grupo de review apenas templates. Devo incluir nos planos de verificação as buscas em PHP.
### Ferramentas para issues:
Para cada issue, preciso especificar tool calls com parâmetros e raciocínio.
Para god template:
→ code_search search_text "public/js/governance" ou "governance.*authorization" file_patterns ["public/js/"] — verificar se existe JS externo do módulo;
→ file_find query_name "authorization" — localizar assets associados.
CSRF:
→ code_search search_text "governance_authorization_config_save" — achar rota e controller.
→ code_search search_text "_token|csrf_token|checkCsrf" file_patterns ["src/Controller/Governance*", "src/Controller/**/Governance*"] — ver se o controller valida CSRF.
Permissão visualizar:
→ code_search search_text "ssmaCanCreateAuthorization|ssmaCanManagePermissions|ssmaCanManageConfig" file_patterns ["templates/governance/authorization/**"] — entender as permissões disponíveis; e no controller.
Contrato de dados (campos novos no JSON):
→ code_search search_text "aprovador_role_id|area_id|aprovador_id|tipo_autorizacao" file_patterns ["src/"] — localizar serialização/controller.
→ file_read_diff path_array ["src/Controller/GovernanceController.php","src/..."]? Precisamos achar primeiro arquivos; usar file_find query_name "GovernanceController" e "Authorization*".
Autosave perda:
→ code_search search_text "beforeunload|visibilitychange|pagehide" nas templates/js para ver se há padrão para flush de pending saves. Se não houver...
json_encode raw:
→ code_search search_text "json_encode|raw" file_patterns ["templates/governance/authorization/**"] — área; e ver o filtro custom do projeto.
→ code_search search_text "JSON_HEX_TAG|json_encode" file_patterns ["src/Twig/*.php"]? não sei. Talvez file_find "Twig*" etc.
Outros fluxos de criação:
→ code_search search_text "setAreaId|setAprovador|setTipo|new.*Autorizacao|MemberAutorizacao" file_patterns ["src/"] — pontos que gravam autorização.
→ file_read_diff path_array ["src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php"] — conferir a mudança fora do grupo (linha removida) e possível impacto.
Componentes:
→ file_find query_name "_search_expandable" e "_pill" etc. — demonstrar existência.
Separador:
→ code_search search_text "team_names|employment_bond" nas templates settings (já temos). Não precisa tool.
### Formatação do output
Requisito: plain text, sem cercas, começa com `Summary:`.
Devemos escrever em pt-BR, e Issues numeradas contínuas ordenadas por severidade descrescente.
Está ok não pôr linhas em branco? deixa razoável.
Preciso ter cuidado: "Strictly follow structure; output nothing else". e "Issues" line.
### Draft
Summary: (descrição)
Issues
1. [high] O template novo `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` (1.223 linhas) e o `_modal_add_approver.html.twig` (361 linhas) concentram ~1.500 linhas de CSS e JS inline... [regra god template]. Essa separação...
→ code_search ...
→ file_find ...
2. [high] O autosave da aba Configurações dispara POST para a rota `governance_authorization_config_save` sem nenhum token CSRF; [explicação].Como o padrão do projeto é toda mutação via AJAX carregar token e o backend validar, ou o save estará sempre falhando (se o backend exigir o token) ou a rota fica vulnerável a CSRF...
→ code_search ...
→ file_find / code_search para ver validação no controller.
3. [high] ...? Hmm, será que a issue 3 deve ser high? Não tenho certeza. Vou usar médio.
3. [medium] O botão "Visualizar" passou a aparecer também para quem não pode criar/editar autorização... potencial exposição de dados; confirmar se é intencional e se há permissão própria; se for exibição só leitura ok...
→ code_search para endpoints de visualização/permissões.
4. [medium] `applyAutCriarModalFields` agora lê `area_id`, `area_responsavel_id`, `aprovador_id`, `aprovador_role_id`, `tipo` etc., e inclui opções dinâmicas. Esses campos precisam vir do backend na edição; e o modal de criação depende das variáveis `aut_company_areas`, `aut_company_roles`, `aut_authorization_types` que o hub injeta. O modal pode ser incluído/renderizado fora do hub (outras rotas) e aí a criação fica impossível (área/tipo obrigatórios sem options) ou edição volta em branco...
→ code_search includes `_modal_authorization_form` em templates; e busca no controller que popular as variáveis; confirmar payload do GET autorização.
→ file_read_diff nos arquivos que carregam dados? Melhor code_search.
5. [medium] O autosave com debounce de 400ms persiste a configuração inteira; se o usuário alterar e sair da página/trocar de aba antes do disparo, perde tudo sem aviso; com duas abas abertas a última gravação sobrescreve a primeira — não há versão/merge. considerar flush em `beforeunload` ou salvar explícito. → code_search se há antesunload em outras telas com autosave semelhante?
Pode soar especulativo. Vou manter medium.
6. [medium] `SsmaAutomationService.php` alterado no mesmo update e existência de outros criadores de autorização: se o backend tornar `area_id`/`tipo` obrigatórios para *todas* as criações, fluxos automáticos podem quebrar — verificar serviço SSMA/outros pontos de gravação, e conferir a linha removida. → file_read_diff SsmaAutomationService; code_search criação de autorização em src/.
7. [medium] `|json_encode|raw` para dados digitados (tipos) e de cadastro (membros com nome/email) embutidos no `<script>`. Embora o json_encode do PHP escape `/` por padrão (mitiga `</script>`), é padrão frágil: tipos podem conter qualquer caractere e a serialização não usa flags/contexto de script; recomendar não confiar / mover para atributos data com escape Twig ou usar json_encode com flags. → code_search procurar outros usos no projeto para seguir padrão/riscos.
Hmm, mas "medium" porque dados de terceiros... Tipos só gestores.
Questão: classificar como medium ainda ok. A issue não precisa ser explosiva; a regra xss do usuário diz "Nunca usar |raw ... sem sanitização". O projeto inteiro pode usar |raw em scripts. Mas vamos marcar.
8. [low] Componentes próprios de UI novos (chips/pills, busca, picker em modal) duplicam compartilhados existentes (`ui/_pill.html.twig`, `ui/_search_expandable.html.twig`, `ui/_custom_select.html.twig`, offcanvas de perfil de membro); e há CSS duplicado em dois templates novos. No mínimo extrair CSS/componentes; como o modal é específico, alerta.
→ file_find...
9. [low] Código morto/enganoso `window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers = function () {}`... chamado após salvar os aprovadores padrão mas não faz nada; remover ou implementar se for para sincronizar algo.
10. [low] `data-teams` como join com `|`... nomes com `|` quebram filtro; allowlist BOND_LABELS omite vínculos não mapeados. Não vou incluir, ou incluo low. Tenho 10 já. Talvez cortar esta e o código de duplicidade de CSS está sob 8.
Preciso decidir severidade "1. [high]" god template, mas será que god template deveria ser a maior? Segundo regra do usuário sim: maior peso. OK.
"Os issues devem ser numerados continuamente e ordenados por severidade decrescente". Então 1-2 high, 3-7 medium, 8-10 low.
Mas deixe-me reconsiderar issue 2 (CSRF). É real e forte. O template manda POST para `governance_authorization_config_save`, definido fora. O controller pode usar `_check_csrf`? Não sabemos. Nossa revisão de templates pode falhar em rotas de mutation via AJAX padrão — Projeto pode usar token em header global configurado via meta. Não vemos headers custom. Verificar $.ajaxPrefilter global? Não no diff. Por isso ferramentas.
### Vamos refinar agora o primeiro texto da issue 1
"O template `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` (1.223 linhas) e o novo `_modal_add_approver.html.twig` (361) despejam ~1.500 linhas de `<style>`/`<script>` dentro do Twig. Isso torna a tela de Configurações impossível de testar isoladamente, duplica CSS (as regras `.gov-auth-settings-chip` existem nos dois arquivos) e impede o uso de build/type-check; além disso a base `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig` já tinha ~2,4 mil linhas e recebe ainda mais JS (AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS, ensureAutCriarSelectOption...). A lógica de picker, filtros e autosave deveria ir para `public/js/...`; no mínimo extrair CSS para assets."
→ code_search: patterns em public/js para módulo governance. `search_text: 'governance' file_patterns: ['public/js/']`.
### Issue 2 CSRF texto
"O autosave ... `persist()` usa `window.jQuery.ajax({method:'POST', contentType:'application/json; charset=UTF-8', data: JSON.stringify(payload)})` sem enviar token CSRF (nem header, nem campo). Pelo padrão do projeto, toda mutação AJAX deve incluir `csrf_token` e o backend validar; sem isso, se o endpoint exigir o token, o recurso de Configurações nunca salva (funcionalidade quebrada), e se não exigir, a rota fica sujeita a POST forjado alterando tipos/aprovadores da empresa. Confirmar o controller e adicionar o token (ex.: meta `csrf-token` + header)."
→ code_search search_text "governance_authorization_config_save" em config e src.
→ code_search search_text "csrf" file_patterns ["src/Controller/*Governance*.php"] ou path.
Como chamar file_search com regex para 'function.*[Cc]onfig.*[Ss]ave|governance_authorization_config'? ok.
### Issue 3 permissão visualizar
No `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig`: antes `autActionsCell = []` sem permissão; agora o botão visualizar fica sempre. Impacto: qualquer pessoa que acesse a lista (mesmo sem permissão de gerir as autorizações? provavelmente a aba exige permissão de visualização) poderá abrir o modal com todos os campos/requisitos. Não sei permissão... vou dizer: "quem não pode criar/editar passa a ver o olho e a abrir o modal de visualização com dados completos (requisitos, responsável, dependências documentais etc.). Se a intenção era só disponibilizar leitura, ok; se não, o acesso deveria seguir a mesma regra de permissão." → code_search permissões no controller, e procurar endpoint do fetch.
### Issue 4 contrato
Na verdade, poderia fundir 3 e 4? Eles compartilham código (visualização/edição). Mas problemas diferentes. Vou manter separados? Podemos fundir em: "A liberação do Visualizar e os campos novos dependem do backend que não está neste diff; confirmar endpoint e permissão." Talvez uma única issue medium seja melhor e menos especulativa. Hmm.
Vou manter separados, mas a 4 é mais sobre dados.
### Issue 5 autosave
texto: "O salvamento é automático com debounce de 400ms; se o usuário adicionar/remover tipos ou aprovadores e fechar a página/trocar de rota antes do timer (ou se o POST falhar silenciosamente), a alteração se perde. Adicionalmente, o payload substitui a configuração inteira — duas abas abertas no mesmo navegador ou dois gestores simultâneos geram sobrescrita total sem aviso. Considerar flush em `pagehide`/`beforeunload` e confirmar se o endpoint valida uma versão/updated_at."
### Issue 6 outros pontos de criação/SSMA
No update há `SsmaAutomationService.php` com -1 linha. Pode ser só remoção. A issue: "Os fluxos que criam autorização fora do modal (ex.: automação SSMA) precisam continuar funcionando se o backend passar a considerar `area_id`/`tipo`... Como a coluna é nova e sem backfill, se o salvar da entidade não for ajustado, autorizações criadas por esses fluxos ficam sem os campos e podem ser bloqueadas por validação de área/tipo; conferir serviço de gravação." Esta é especulativa também (formulário UI não quebra outros fluxos). A regra do autor: "no review, conferir se authorizationSave já grava esses campos" — é literalmente sobre backend.
Vou manter: medium com verificação. "médio" ok, mas pode ser melhor "low" com verificação porque estamos olhando UI e não backend. Mas se o backend é parte desta PR e faz parte de uma feature branch, deve estar no código para revisão separada. Mantenho "médio" para garantir revisão backend dos campos.
### Issue 7 json
### Issue 8 componentes
### Issue 9 stub
Tudo plano. Devo incluir (none)? não.
Verificar mais uma vez o System output: "If an issue needs no tool verification, omit tool lines." ok.
Tool usage descrito com `→ tool args — reason`. Não executar.
Ok — Elaborar o Summary breve: "A PR adiciona a aba Configurações ...", em pt.
Estou pronto para construir o texto final.
Summary: Esta alteração adiciona a aba “Configurações” no hub de Autorizações (tipos de autorização e aprovadores padrão por empresa, com persistência automática via POST em endpoint novo), cria o modal de adicionar aprovadores com busca/filtros e amplia o modal de criar/editar autorização com os campos área, tipo, aprovador membro e cargo aprovador. Também ajusta a listagem para exibir a ação “Visualizar” independentemente da permissão de criação e adiciona lógica JS para sincronizar os novos selects.
Issues
1. [high] Os dois arquivos novos (`_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` com 1.223 linhas e `_modal_add_approver.html.twig` com 361 linhas) concentram cerca de 1.500 linhas de CSS e JavaScript inline dentro do Twig, e ainda acrescentam mais lógica no já gigante `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig`. Isso mantém o padrão de “god template” que a regra de revisão manda sinalizar em primeiro lugar: a lógica de picker, filtros, autosave e manipulação de DOM fica fora de `public/js/`, impossibilita teste isolado/build e ainda duplica CSS (por exemplo, as regras de `.gov-auth-settings-chip` aparecem nos dois arquivos novos). O ideal é mover o script e o estilo para assets dedicados e deixar o Twig só com a marcação; na menor hipótese, extrair o CSS para um arquivo único reutilizável.
→ code_search de “governance” em `public/js/` — verificar se o projeto já mantém JS de módulo fora dos templates e qual o padrão a seguir.
→ file_find por “authorization” (query_name: “authorization”) — localizar assets JS/CSS associados ao módulo para indicar onde o código deveria estar.
2. [high] O autosave da aba Configurações executa `window.jQuery.ajax({method:'POST', contentType:'application/json; charset=UTF-8', data: JSON.stringify(payload)})` para a rota `governance_authorization_config_save` sem enviar nenhum token CSRF (nem header, nem campo no corpo). Se o endpoint validar CSRF — como é o padrão do projeto para mutação via AJAX — o salvamento vai falhar sempre e a tela de Configurações fica inutilizável; se não validar, a rota fica aberta a POST forjado alterando tipos e aprovadores padrão da empresa. É preciso incluir o token (por exemplo, lendo o meta `csrf-token` e enviando no header) e confirmar que o controller valida.
→ code_search por “governance_authorization_config_save” — localizar a definição da rota e o controller que recebe o POST.
→ code_search por “csrf” em `src/Controller/` — conferir se o endpoint de save valida token CSRF e como outros controllers do mesmo módulo fazem a validação.
3. [medium] A lista de autorizações passou a exibir o botão “Visualizar” mesmo quando `ssmaCanCreateAuthorization` é falso (antes a célula de ações ficava vazia sem permissão de criação). Isso muda quem consegue abrir o modal de visualização com dados completos da autorização, incluindo requisitos do colaborador, responsável e dependências documentais da empresa. Se havia uma regra de negócio de restringir inclusive a visualização, essa mudança expõe informação; se a intenção era permitir leitura para quem acessa a listagem, é preciso garantir que o endpoint de detalhe respeite a permissão de visualização (e não apenas a de edição).
→ code_search por “ssmaCanCreateAuthorization|ssmaCanManageConfig|ssmaCanManagePermissions” em `templates/` e `src/` — mapear as permissões existentes e ver se há uma permissão separada de visualização de autorização.
→ code_search por “visualizar” ou “detalhe” no controller/roteamento do módulo — confirmar qual endpoint o modal usa e se ele valida permissão de leitura.
4. [medium] A edição/visualização agora depende de campos novos no JSON retornado pelo backend (`area_id`, `area_responsavel_id`, `aprovador_id`, `aprovador_role_id`, `tipo`, `aprovador.*`, `aprovador_role.*`), usados em `applyAutCriarModalFields`, e o modal de criação passou a depender das variáveis `aut_company_areas`, `aut_company_roles`, `aut_authorization_types` e `allMembers` injetadas pelo hub. Se o endpoint de detalhe que alimenta o modal não trouxer esses campos, a edição volta com área/tipo/aprovadores em branco; e se o modal for renderizado em alguma outra rota que não passa essas variáveis, os selects nascem vazios e a criação fica impossível (área e tipo são obrigatórios). É preciso confirmar o contrato com o controller/serialização fora deste grupo de arquivos.
→ code_search por “_modal_authorization_form” em `templates/` — localizar todas as inclusões do modal e verificar se todas as rotas que o renderizam populam as variáveis novas.
→ code_search por “aprovador_role_id|aprovador_id|area_id|tipo_autorizacao” em `src/` — conferir se o controller de detalhe/edição serializa os campos esperados pelo modal.
5. [medium] O salvamento das Configurações é automático com debounce de 400 ms e substitui a configuração inteira (`authorization_types`, `use_members`, `use_roles`, `approver_members`, `approver_roles`) a cada mudança. Se o usuário alterar algo e sair da página ou trocar de rota antes do timer disparar — ou se o POST falhar — a alteração é perdida silenciosamente; além disso, duas abas/dois gestores editando simultaneamente fazem o último POST sobrescrever completamente o trabalho do outro, sem merge nem prevenção de conflito. Vale disparar um flush no `pagehide`/`beforeunload` e, se possível, conferir se o backend tem alguma proteção de concorrência (por exemplo, `updated_at`/versão).
→ code_search por “beforeunload|visibilitychange|pagehide” em templates e em `public/js/` — verificar se o projeto já tem um padrão para descarregar autosaves pendentes ao sair da página.
6. [medium] Os campos obrigatórios novos (`area_id` e `tipo`) e os opcionais (`aprovador_id`, `aprovador_role_id`) são enviados apenas pelo modal de criação/edição. Fluxos que criam ou alteram `member_autorizacao` fora dessa UI — como o `SsmaAutomationService.php`, que foi alterado neste mesmo update mesmo estando fora deste grupo — precisam continuar válidos se o backend passar a tratar esses campos (validação de obrigatoriedade ou gravação). Como as colunas são novas e sem backfill, convém confirmar o serviço/controller de gravação e o que mudou no SsmaAutomationService.
→ file_read_diff para `src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php` — ver a linha removida e se afeta criação de autorização/requisitos.
→ code_search por “member_autorizacao|MemberAutorizacao|setArea|aprovador_role_id” em `src/` — localizar todos os pontos que gravam autorização fora do modal e conferir se o backend ajusta ou valida os campos novos.
7. [medium] Os dados digitados/gravados (tipos de autorização, nomes/cargos/times de membros) são embutidos no HTML por `|json_encode|raw` dentro de blocos `<script>` (por exemplo, `initialTypes`, `catalogMembers`, `catalogRoles`, `initialApproverMembers`, `initialApproverRoles`). Embora o `json_encode` do PHP escape `/` por padrão — o que reduz o risco clássico de `</script>` — a combinação `|raw` com dados controlados parcialmente pelo usuário é frágil e contraria a regra de nunca emitir `|raw` sem sanitização; qualquer mudança futura de flags de serialização reabre um vetor de XSS armazenado. Nos pontos onde os valores são inseridos como texto (`textContent`, `setAttribute`) o uso está correto; vale padronizar a serialização com `JSON_HEX_TAG|JSON_HEX_AMP|JSON_HEX_APOS|JSON_HEX_QUOT` ou mover esses dados para atributos `data-*` escapados pelo Twig.
→ code_search por “json_encode|raw” em `templates/governance/authorization/` — mapear todas as ocorrências e avaliar o padrão usado.
→ file_find por “Twig” em `src/` — verificar se o projeto tem filtro próprio de JSON/HTML que já aplique as flags de segurança recomendadas.
8. [low] O novo modal de aprovadores e a aba Configurações criam componentes de UI próprios (chips/pills, busca com filtros, seletor de área, tabela com seleção em modal) que se parecem com componentes compartilhados já existentes, como `ui/_pill.html.twig`, `ui/_search_expandable.html.twig`, `ui/_custom_select.html.twig`, `_modal_offcanvas.html.twig` e o offcanvas de perfil de membro. Isso é um alerta de reaproveitamento: pode haver justificativa de design para um picker específico da tela, mas pelo menos o CSS duplicado entre `_tab_authorizations_settings` e `_modal_add_approver` deveria ser unificado, e vale avaliar se o seletor de pessoas/áreas não deveria virar um componente compartilhado, já que tende a se repetir em outros módulos.
→ file_find por “_search_expandable” e por “_pill” em `templates/components/` — confirmar os componentes equivalentes existentes e orientar a conversa de reaproveitamento.
9. [low] A função `window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers = function () {}` é declarada vazia e é chamada logo após o salvamento das Configurações com a lista de aprovadores atualizada; além de ser código enganoso (sugere uma sincronização que não acontece), mascara a intenção de atualizar o modal de criação com os aprovadores padrão quando nenhum aprovador específico é informado. Se essa sincronização não é desejada nesta tela, a função e a chamada deveriam ser removidas; se é desejada, falta implementar.
→ code_search por “ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers” em `templates/` — confirmar todos os pontos de definição e chamada antes de remover/implementar.
main_task
Request #1
deepseek-v4-flash
P:31.5K C:381 CR:2.69K CW:0
3672ms
Reasoning
Let me start by understanding the task. I need to review the code changes in the review_files. The review plan has 9 issues to investigate. I need to verify each one through code searches and context tools.
Let me start by gathering context on the files involved. First, let me look at the changed files outside the review group: `src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php` (+0/-1).
Let me investigate:
1. God template issue - check public/js/ for governance module JS
2. CSRF check for governance_authorization_config_save endpoint
3. Permissions mapping for visualizar action
4. Contract with controller/serialization for new fields
5. Autosave patterns
6. SsmaAutomationService changes and other places that write member_autorizacao
7. json_encode|raw usage patterns
8. Component reuse check
9. ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers usage
Let me run these searches in parallel where possible.
Let me start.
Tool Calls (4)
file_read_diff
Show Details
Arguments
{"path_array": ["src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php"]}
Result
==== FILE: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php ==== diff --git a/src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php b/src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php --- a/src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php +++ b/src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@ <?php - declare(strict_types=1); namespace App\Service\Ssma;
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "governance_authorization_config_save"}
Result
File: config/routes_governance.yaml
Match lines: 1
375|governance_authorization_config_save:
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig
Match lines: 1
295| var SAVE_URL = {{ path('governance_authorization_config_save')|json_encode|raw }};
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers"}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig
Match lines: 1
2419| window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers = function () {
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig
Match lines: 2
589| if (typeof window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers === 'function') {
590| window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers(res.approver_members || payload.approver_members);
file_find
Show Details
Arguments
{"query_name": "governance"}
Result
bin/run-check-process-governance.sh config/automations/governance_cases.yaml config/routes_governance.yaml docs/database-changes/2026-08-31-governance-authorization-config.md docs/governance/GOVERNANCE_DYNAMIC_INTEGRATION_TODO.md docs/governance/GOVERNANCE_MODULE_OVERVIEW.md docs/ontology/audits/attendance_governance_audit_2026_05_15.md docs/ssma/system/governance_authorizations_and_badges.md migrations/Version20260523140000_GovernanceCaseRecord.php migrations/Version20260528120000_GovernanceCaseAutomationEngine.php migrations/Version20260528140000_GovernanceCaseDetailInteractions.php migrations/Version20260615120000_GovernanceAuthorizationDocumentUploader.php migrations/Version20260617120000_GovernanceGrcCasesCenter.php migrations/Version20260617140000_GovernanceGrcCaseModel.php migrations/Version20260617160000_GovernanceGrcCaseEnhancements.php migrations/Version20260619180000_GovernanceCaseRecordClosedManually.php migrations/Version20260623120000_GovernanceAuthorizationCollaboratorCnhValidadePorRequisito.php migrations/Version20260625120000_GovernanceCaseBlock.php migrations/Version20260625140000_GovernanceCaseExceptionResponsibleMember.php migrations/Version20260831143000_GovernanceAuthorizationConfig.php public/css/governance/governance-authorization-detail-offcanvas.css public/css/governance/governance-authorization.css public/css/governance/governance-cases-detail-offcanvas.css public/css/governance/governance-cases.css public/css/governance/governance-evidence-checklist.css public/css/governance/governance-hub-layout.css public/css/governance/governance-modal-form.css public/js/governance/governance-authorization-view-monitoring.js public/js/governance/governance-cases-automations.js public/js/governance/governance-cases-control-wizard.js public/js/governance/governance-cases-dashboard.js public/js/governance/governance-cases-grc.js public/js/governance/governance-hub-components.js src/Command/CheckProcessGovernanceCommand.php src/Command/GovernanceAuthCasesSyncCommand.php src/Command/GovernanceCasesAutomationDispatchCommand.php src/Command/GovernanceCasesAutomationSyncRulesCommand.php src/Command/GovernanceCasesMigrateAutomationConditionsCommand.php src/Command/GovernanceCasesPurgeFlowsCommand.php src/Command/GovernanceCasesReopenCheckCommand.php src/Command/GovernanceCasesValidateAutomationCatalogCommand.php src/Command/GovernanceGrcHistorySanitizeCommand.php src/Command/GovernanceSeedCasesExamplesCommand.php src/Command/GovernanceSeedExampleAuthorizationCaseCommand.php src/Command/GovernanceSeedExampleResolvedCasesCommand.php src/Command/GovernanceVerifyAuthorizationExpirationCommand.php src/Controller/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController.php src/Controller/Governance/GovernanceCasesAutomationBuilderController.php src/Controller/Governance/MemberGovernancePendenciesController.php src/Controller/GovernanceController.php src/Entity/GovernanceAuthorization.php src/Entity/GovernanceAuthorizationApprover.php src/Entity/GovernanceAuthorizationCollaborator.php src/Entity/GovernanceAuthorizationConditionConfig.php src/Entity/GovernanceAuthorizationConfig.php src/Entity/GovernanceAuthorizationDocument.php src/Entity/GovernanceAuthorizationType.php src/Entity/GovernanceBadge.php src/Entity/GovernanceBadgeAuthorization.php src/Entity/GovernanceBadgeConfig.php src/Entity/GovernanceCaseAutomationExecution.php src/Entity/GovernanceCaseAutomationRule.php src/Entity/GovernanceCaseBlock.php src/Entity/GovernanceCaseException.php src/Entity/GovernanceCaseHistory.php src/Entity/GovernanceCaseHistoryEvent.php src/Entity/GovernanceCaseRecord.php src/Entity/GovernanceCaseRuntimeState.php src/Entity/GovernanceGrcCase.php src/Entity/GovernanceIntelligentControl.php src/Governance/Grc/GovernanceCaseScenarioAutomationMapper.php src/Governance/Grc/GovernanceCaseScenarioCatalog.php src/Governance/Grc/GovernanceGrcCaseCurrentStatus.php src/Governance/Grc/GovernanceGrcCaseHistoryEventType.php src/Governance/Grc/GovernanceGrcCaseLifecycleStatus.php src/Governance/Grc/GovernanceGrcCaseSeverity.php src/Governance/Grc/GovernanceGrcCaseState.php src/Governance/Grc/GovernanceGrcDecisionStatus.php src/Governance/Grc/GovernanceGrcOperationalDecision.php src/Governance/Grc/GovernanceGrcSlaStatus.php src/Governance/Grc/GovernanceGrcWorkstreamStatus.php src/Governance/Grc/GovernanceIntelligentControlWizardCatalog.php src/Repository/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigRepository.php src/Repository/GovernanceAuthorizationRepository.php src/Repository/GovernanceBadgeConfigRepository.php src/Repository/GovernanceBadgeRepository.php src/Repository/GovernanceCaseAutomationExecutionRepository.php src/Repository/GovernanceCaseAutomationRuleRepository.php src/Repository/GovernanceCaseBlockRepository.php src/Repository/GovernanceCaseExceptionRepository.php src/Repository/GovernanceCaseHistoryEventRepository.php src/Repository/GovernanceCaseHistoryRepository.php src/Repository/GovernanceCaseRecordRepository.php src/Repository/GovernanceCaseRuntimeStateRepository.php src/Repository/GovernanceGrcCaseRepository.php src/Repository/GovernanceIntelligentControlRepository.php src/Service/Governance/CaseAutomation/GovernanceCaseAutomationActionRunner.php src/Service/Governance/CaseAutomation/GovernanceCaseAutomationAuditService.php src/Service/Governance/CaseAutomation/GovernanceCaseAutomationEngine.php src/Service/Governance/CaseAutomation/GovernanceCaseAutomationEvaluator.php
Request #2
deepseek-v4-flash
P:33.63K C:216 CR:31.87K CW:0
2477ms
Reasoning
The project has `public/js/governance/` with JS files like `governance-authorization-view-monitoring.js`, `governance-hub-components.js`, etc. And `public/css/governance/`. This confirms the god template concern is real - the module already keeps JS in public/js.
Let me now look at the route config for the config_save endpoint and the controller to see CSRF validation.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "config/routes_governance.yaml", "start_line": 360, "end_line": 390}
Result
File: config/routes_governance.yaml (Total lines: 408)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 360-390
360|governance_authorization_conditions_save:
361| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/conditions
362| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::authorizationConditionsSave
363| methods: [POST]
364|
365|governance_authorization_condition_usage:
366| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/conditions/usage
367| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::authorizationConditionUsage
368| methods: [GET]
369|
370|governance_authorization_config_get:
371| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/config
372| controller: App\Controller\Governance\GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController::show
373| methods: [GET]
374|
375|governance_authorization_config_save:
376| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/config
377| controller: App\Controller\Governance\GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController::save
378| methods: [POST]
379|
380|member_governance_pendencies_index:
381| path: /user/pendencies
382| controller: App\Controller\Governance\MemberGovernancePendenciesController::index
383| methods: [GET]
384|
385|member_governance_pendencies_documents_list:
386| path: /user/pendencies/authorizations/{autId}/documents
387| controller: App\Controller\Governance\MemberGovernancePendenciesController::documentsList
388| methods: [GET]
389| requirements:
390| autId: '\d+'
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Controller/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController.php"}
Result
File: src/Controller/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController.php (Total lines: 133)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-133
1|<?php
2|
3|declare(strict_types=1);
4|
5|namespace App\Controller\Governance;
6|
7|use App\Entity\Company;
8|use App\Entity\User;
9|use App\Service\Governance\GovernanceAuthorizationConfigService;
10|use Doctrine\ORM\EntityManagerInterface;
11|use Psr\Log\LoggerInterface;
12|use Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Controller\AbstractController;
13|use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\JsonResponse;
14|use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request;
15|use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\RequestStack;
16|
17|final class GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController extends AbstractController
18|{
19| public function __construct(
20| private EntityManagerInterface $entityManager,
21| private RequestStack $requestStack,
22| private GovernanceAuthorizationConfigService $authorizationConfigService,
23| private LoggerInterface $logger,
24| ) {
25| }
26|
27| public function show(): JsonResponse
28| {
29| /** @var User|null $user */
30| $user = $this->getUser();
31| $company = $this->currentGovernanceCompany();
32| if (!$user || !$company) {
33| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Não autenticado.'], 401);
34| }
35| if (!$this->canManageAuthorizationConfig()) {
36| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Sem permissão para consultar configurações de Autorizações.'], 403);
37| }
38|
39| $view = $this->authorizationConfigService->getViewData($company);
40|
41| return new JsonResponse([
42| 'success' => true,
43| 'authorization_types' => $view['aut_authorization_types'],
44| 'use_members' => $view['aut_authorization_use_members'],
45| 'use_roles' => $view['aut_authorization_use_roles'],
46| 'approver_members' => $view['aut_authorization_approver_members'],
47| 'approver_roles' => $view['aut_authorization_approver_roles'],
48| 'company_roles' => $view['aut_company_roles'],
49| ]);
50| }
51|
52| public function save(Request $request): JsonResponse
53| {
54| /** @var User|null $user */
55| $user = $this->getUser();
56| $company = $this->currentGovernanceCompany();
57| if (!$user || !$company) {
58| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Não autenticado.'], 401);
59| }
60| if (!$this->canManageAuthorizationConfig()) {
61| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Sem permissão para alterar configurações de Autorizações.'], 403);
62| }
63|
64| $payload = json_decode($request->getContent(), true);
65| if (!is_array($payload)) {
66| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Payload inválido.'], 400);
67| }
68|
69| try {
70| $data = $this->authorizationConfigService->savePayload($company, $payload, $user);
71| } catch (\InvalidArgumentException $e) {
72| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => $e->getMessage()], 422);
73| } catch (\Throwable $e) {
74| $this->logger->error('authorizationConfigSave: ' . $e->getMessage(), ['exception' => $e]);
75|
76| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Erro ao salvar configurações.'], 500);
77| }
78|
79| return new JsonResponse([
80| 'success' => true,
81| 'message' => 'Configurações salvas.',
82| 'authorization_types' => $data['authorization_types'],
83| 'use_members' => $data['use_members'],
84| 'use_roles' => $data['use_roles'],
85| 'approver_members' => $data['approver_members'],
86| 'approver_roles' => $data['approver_roles'],
87| ]);
88| }
89|
90| private function currentGovernanceCompany(): ?Company
91| {
92| $request = $this->requestStack->getCurrentRequest();
93| $currentCompany = $request?->attributes->get('current_company');
94| if ($currentCompany instanceof Company) {
95| return $currentCompany;
96| }
97|
98| if ($request !== null && $request->hasSession()) {
99| $selectedWorkspace = (string) $request->getSession()->get('selected_workspace', '');
100| if ($selectedWorkspace !== '' && str_starts_with($selectedWorkspace, 'company_')) {
101| $companyId = (int) str_replace('company_', '', $selectedWorkspace);
102| if ($companyId > 0) {
103| $companyFromWorkspace = $this->entityManager->getRepository(Company::class)->find($companyId);
104| if ($companyFromWorkspace instanceof Company) {
105| return $companyFromWorkspace;
106| }
107| }
108| }
109| }
110|
111| /** @var User|null $user */
112| $user = $this->getUser();
113|
114| return $user ? $user->getCompany() : null;
115| }
116|
117| private function canManageAuthorizationConfig(): bool
118| {
119| if ($this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN') || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER') || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR')) {
120| return true;
121| }
122|
123| $request = $this->requestStack->getCurrentRequest();
124| if (!$request) {
125| return false;
126| }
127|
128| return (bool) $request->attributes->get('can_create', false)
129| || (bool) $request->attributes->get('can_edit', false)
130| || (bool) $request->attributes->get('can_delete', false);
131| }
132|}
133|
Request #3
deepseek-v4-flash
P:35.79K C:384 CR:33.79K CW:0
3369ms
Reasoning
Interesting. The config save controller does NOT validate CSRF token. It checks permission via role and request attributes. Let me examine how other mutation controllers in the project handle CSRF to determine whether the project uses CSRF validation on AJAX endpoints, or maybe the firewall is token-based. Let me check the GovernanceController's authorizationConditionsSave and authorizationSave functions.
Also, the controller `save` method: it uses `canManageAuthorizationConfig` based on request attributes `can_create`, `can_edit`, `can_delete`. Hmm, but where does the attribute come from? Possibly a route/listener setting these attributes based on permissions. Let me investigate further.
Let me look at GovernanceController for conditions save and see how csrf is handled there, and check if there's an existing pattern for POST save endpoints with csrf.
Let me search for `csrf_token` in twig templates in the governance module, and check how existing similar endpoints are called from templates (e.g., `authorizationConditionsSave`).
Tool Calls (3)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "authorizationConditionsSave|authorizationSave|authorizationDetail"}
Result
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "csrf_token", "file_patterns": ["templates/governance/**"]}
Result
File: templates/governance/badge/badge_create.html.twig
Match lines: 3
22|{% set badgeCsrfToken = csrf_token('governance_badge_actions') %}
1019| formData.append('_csrf_token', badgeCsrfToken);
1333| _csrf_token: badgeCsrfToken
File: templates/governance/badge/partials/_modal_save_config.html.twig
Match lines: 1
3|{% set badgeCsrfToken = csrf_token('governance_badge_actions') %}
File: templates/governance/badge/tabs/_tab_badges.html.twig
Match lines: 1
8|{% set badgeCsrfToken = csrf_token('governance_badge_actions') %}
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "isCsrfTokenValid|csrfToken|checkCsrf", "file_patterns": ["src/Controller/**"]}
Result
No matches found
Request #4
deepseek-v4-flash
P:36.38K C:178 CR:36.1K CW:0
1744ms
Reasoning
Interesting. Let me look at how CSRF is validated on the server side. Search for `_csrf_token` in src/Controller and see how endpoints validate.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "_csrf_token|csrf", "file_patterns": ["src/Controller/Governance*.php", "src/Controller/Governance/*.php"]}
Result
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "governance_badge_actions", "file_patterns": ["src/**"]}
Result
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php
Match lines: 1
5478| if ($token === '' || !$this->isCsrfTokenValid('governance_badge_actions', $token)) {
Request #5
deepseek-v4-flash
P:36.63K C:251 CR:36.48K CW:0
2760ms
Reasoning
So the governance module DOES validate CSRF tokens in GovernanceController with `isCsrfTokenValid('governance_badge_actions', $token)`. So CSRF is used in this module.
Now, the new GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController::save does NOT validate CSRF. This confirms concern #2: the new endpoint doesn't check CSRF. But also, is it the "pattern of the project" to require CSRF for all mutations? Let me check if other governance POST endpoints validate CSRF. Search `isCsrfTokenValid` throughout src/Controller.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/GovernanceController.php"], "search_text": "isCsrfTokenValid"}
Result
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php
Match lines: 1
5478| if ($token === '' || !$this->isCsrfTokenValid('governance_badge_actions', $token)) {
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/**"], "search_text": "isCsrfTokenValid"}
Result
File: src/Controller/Api/FileManagementV2Controller.php
Match lines: 1
1294| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('editor_image', $request->request->get('_token'))) {
File: src/Controller/BillingCollectionRuleController.php
Match lines: 3
43| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('billing_collection_rule_create', (string) $request->request->get('_token', ''))) {
98| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('billing_collection_rule_update_' . $id, (string) $request->request->get('_token', ''))) {
143| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('billing_collection_rule_delete_' . $id, (string) $request->request->get('_token', ''))) {
File: src/Controller/CompanyInvitationConfirmationController.php
Match lines: 4
153| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('company_invitation_confirmation', (string) $request->request->get('_token'))) {
494| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('company_inactivation_' . $company->getId(), (string) $request->request->get('_token'))) {
527| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('company_activation_' . $company->getId(), (string) $request->request->get('_token'))) {
598| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('company_plan_customization', (string) $request->request->get('_token'))) {
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystem/RiskIntelligence/BehavioralIndicatorActionController.php
Match lines: 4
42| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid(self::CSRF_TOKEN_ID, (string) ($data['_token'] ?? ''))) {
71| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid(self::CSRF_TOKEN_ID, (string) ($data['_token'] ?? ''))) {
106| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid(self::CSRF_TOKEN_ID, (string) ($data['_token'] ?? ''))) {
134| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid(self::CSRF_TOKEN_ID, (string) ($data['_token'] ?? ''))) {
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystem/RiskIntelligence/SignalActionPlanController.php
Match lines: 1
55| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('risk_indicator_context', (string) ($data['_token'] ?? ''))) {
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystemRiskIntelligenceController.php
Match lines: 5
133| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('risk_signal_status', (string) ($data['_token'] ?? ''))) {
227| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('risk_indicator_context', (string) ($data['_token'] ?? ''))) {
580| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('risk_indicator_context', (string) ($data['_token'] ?? ''))) {
620| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('risk_indicator_context', (string) ($data['_token'] ?? ''))) {
662| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('risk_indicator_context', (string) ($data['_token'] ?? ''))) {
File: src/Controller/FocusNfseSettingsController.php
Match lines: 1
19| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('focus_nfse_settings', (string) $request->request->get('_token'))) {
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php
Match lines: 1
5478| if ($token === '' || !$this->isCsrfTokenValid('governance_badge_actions', $token)) {
File: src/Controller/InvoiceController.php
Match lines: 6
142| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('invoice_billing_type_update', $csrfToken)) {
262| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('invoice_auto_debit_update', $csrfToken)) {
383| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('invoice_controlled_extra_credit_update', $csrfToken)) {
626| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('invoice_extra_credit_purchase', $csrfToken)) {
930| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('dismiss_auto_debit_failure_' . $paymentRecord->getId(), $csrfToken)) {
993| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('dismiss_auto_debit_failure_' . $paymentRecord->getId(), $csrfToken)) {
File: src/Controller/PaymentSimulationController.php
Match lines: 2
61| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('payment_simulation_env_update', (string) $request->request->get('_token'))) {
120| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('payment_simulation_env_update', (string) ($payload['_token'] ?? ''))) {
File: src/Controller/ProcessSubdepartmentController.php
Match lines: 1
97| if ($this->isCsrfTokenValid('delete'.$processSubdepartment->getId(), $request->request->get('_token'))) {
File: src/Controller/ScoreController.php
Match lines: 1
249| if ($this->isCsrfTokenValid('delete' . $goalCompany->getId(), $request->request->get('_token'))) {
File: src/Controller/TokensController.php
Match lines: 3
54| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('tokens_billing_settings_update', $csrfToken)) {
122| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('tokens_sync_model_prices', $csrfToken)) {
196| if (!$this->isCsrfTokenValid('tokens_model_update', $csrfToken)) {
Request #6
deepseek-v4-flash
P:38.25K C:116 CR:36.86K CW:0
1960ms
Reasoning
Interesting: only some controllers validate CSRF. Let me check the GovernanceController authorization methods to understand how they do CSRF and save — e.g., `authorizationSave`. Search in GovernanceController for authorization save.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/GovernanceController.php"], "search_text": "function authorization"}
Result
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php Match lines: 25 411| public function authorizationIndex(): Response 420| public function authorizationMonitoring(): Response 429| public function authorizationMonitoringPanel(): JsonResponse 1337| public function authorizationSave(Request $request): JsonResponse 1478| public function authorizationRemove(Request $request, int $id): JsonResponse 1531| public function authorizationUsage(int $id): JsonResponse 1565| public function authorizationDetail(int $id): JsonResponse 1606| public function authorizationDeactivate(Request $request, int $id): JsonResponse 1649| public function authorizationActivate(Request $request, int $id): JsonResponse 1692| public function authorizationUnlinkMember(int $autId, int $memberId): JsonResponse 1714| public function authorizationBlockMember(Request $request, int $autId, int $memberId): JsonResponse 1797| public function authorizationApplyMembers(Request $request): JsonResponse 1936| public function authorizationNotifyMember(Request $request, int $autId, int $memberId): JsonResponse 1992| public function authorizationExtendValidity(Request $request, int $autId): JsonResponse 2037| public function authorizationDocumentsList(int $autId, int $memberId): JsonResponse 2113| public function authorizationMemberCnhGet(Request $request, int $memberId): JsonResponse 2131| public function authorizationMemberCnhSave(Request $request, int $memberId): JsonResponse 2230| public function authorizationRequirementValiditySave(Request $request, int $autId, int $memberId): JsonResponse 2324| public function authorizationDocumentUpload(Request $request, int $autId, int $memberId): JsonResponse 2549| public function authorizationDocumentValidate(Request $request, int $docId): JsonResponse 2746| public function authorizationDocumentRemove(int $docId): JsonResponse 2846| public function authorizationConditionsGet(): JsonResponse 2862| public function authorizationConditionsSave(Request $request): JsonResponse 2893| public function authorizationConditionUsage(Request $request): JsonResponse 3526| private function authorizationHistoryCaseKey(int $authorizationId): string
Request #7
deepseek-v4-flash
P:38.87K C:127 CR:38.27K CW:0
1950ms
Reasoning
Let me read authorizationSave and authorizationDetail to see CSRF usage and to know what fields are serialized. Also read the section around authorizationDetail serialization to check whether new fields are included.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Controller/GovernanceController.php", "start_line": 1337, "end_line": 1530}
Result
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php (Total lines: 6066)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1337-1530
1337| public function authorizationSave(Request $request): JsonResponse
1338| {
1339| if (!$this->canManageAuthorizations()) {
1340| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Sem permissão.'], 403);
1341| }
1342|
1343| $company = $this->currentGovernanceCompany();
1344|
1345| if (!$company) {
1346| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Empresa não encontrada.'], 403);
1347| }
1348|
1349| $data = json_decode($request->getContent(), true) ?? [];
1350| $titulo = trim((string) ($data['titulo'] ?? ''));
1351| $desc = trim((string) ($data['descricao'] ?? ''));
1352|
1353| if ($titulo === '') {
1354| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Título da autorização é obrigatório.'], 400);
1355| }
1356| if ($desc === '') {
1357| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Descrição é obrigatória.'], 400);
1358| }
1359|
1360| $condExtras = [];
1361| foreach ($this->authorizationConditionConfig->getConditionsForFrontend($company) as $c) {
1362| if (!empty($c['active']) && is_string($c['nome'] ?? null)) {
1363| $nome = trim($c['nome']);
1364| if ($nome !== '') {
1365| $condExtras[] = $nome;
1366| }
1367| }
1368| }
1369| $requisitos = AutorizacaoRequisitoCatalog::normalizeFromRequest($data['requisitos'] ?? [], $condExtras);
1370| if ($requisitos === []) {
1371| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Selecione ao menos um requisito.'], 400);
1372| }
1373| $contractorRequirementDependencies = $this->normalizeContractorRequirementDependencies(
1374| $company,
1375| $data['contractor_requirement_dependencies'] ?? []
1376| );
1377|
1378| $responsavelId = (int) ($data['responsavel_id'] ?? 0);
1379| if ($responsavelId <= 0) {
1380| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Responsável pela autorização é obrigatório.'], 400);
1381| }
1382|
1383| try {
1384| $em = $this->entityManager;
1385| $id = !empty($data['id']) ? (int) $data['id'] : null;
1386|
1387| $responsavelMember = $em->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find($responsavelId);
1388| if (
1389| !$responsavelMember
1390| || $responsavelMember->getCompany()?->getId() !== $company->getId()
1391| || $responsavelMember->getIsRemoved()
1392| ) {
1393| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Responsável inválido.'], 400);
1394| }
1395|
1396| $beforeSnapshot = null;
1397| if ($id !== null) {
1398| $aut = $em->getRepository(GovernanceAuthorization::class)
1399| ->findOneBy(['id' => $id, 'company' => $company]);
1400| if (!$aut) {
1401| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Autorização não encontrada.'], 404);
1402| }
1403| $beforeSnapshot = [
1404| 'titulo' => (string) ($aut->getTitulo() ?? ''),
1405| 'descricao' => (string) ($aut->getDescricao() ?? ''),
1406| 'requisitos' => $aut->getRequisitosList(),
1407| 'contractor_requirement_dependencies' => $aut->getContractorRequirementDependencies(),
1408| 'responsavel_id' => (int) ($aut->getResponsavelMember()?->getId() ?? 0),
1409| ];
1410| } else {
1411| $aut = new GovernanceAuthorization();
1412| $aut->setCompany($company);
1413| }
1414|
1415| $aut->setTitulo($titulo);
1416| $aut->setDescricao($desc !== '' ? $desc : null);
1417| $aut->setRequisitos($requisitos);
1418| $aut->setContractorRequirementDependencies($contractorRequirementDependencies);
1419| $aut->setResponsavelMember($responsavelMember);
1420| if ($id === null) {
1421| $aut->setStatus('ativa');
1422| } elseif (array_key_exists('status', $data)) {
1423| $statusRaw = strtolower(trim((string) $data['status']));
1424| $aut->setStatus(in_array($statusRaw, ['inativa', 'inativo', '0', 'false'], true) ? 'inativa' : 'ativa');
1425| }
1426| $aut->setValidade(null);
1427| $aut->setEmitida(null);
1428|
1429| $em->persist($aut);
1430|
1431| /** @var GovernanceAuthorizationRepository $autRepo */
1432| $autRepo = $em->getRepository(GovernanceAuthorization::class);
1433|
1434| $em->flush();
1435|
1436| $actorMember = $this->currentGovernanceActorMember($company);
1437| $authTitle = (string) ($aut->getTitulo() ?: 'Autorização');
1438| if ($id === null) {
1439| $this->appendAuthorizationUserHistory(
1440| $company,
1441| (int) $aut->getId(),
1442| sprintf('criou a autorização (%s)', $authTitle),
1443| sprintf('Autorização %s criada', $authTitle),
1444| $actorMember,
1445| 'authorization_create',
1446| );
1447| } elseif ($beforeSnapshot !== null) {
1448| $editedFields = $this->detectAuthorizationEditedFields(
1449| $beforeSnapshot,
1450| $titulo,
1451| $desc,
1452| $requisitos,
1453| $contractorRequirementDependencies,
1454| $responsavelId,
1455| );
1456| if ($editedFields !== []) {
1457| $this->appendAuthorizationUserHistory(
1458| $company,
1459| (int) $aut->getId(),
1460| 'editou a autorização',
1461| 'Campos editados: ' . implode(', ', $editedFields),
1462| $actorMember,
1463| 'authorization_update',
1464| );
1465| }
1466| }
1467|
1468| return $this->json([
1469| 'success' => true,
1470| 'message' => $id !== null ? 'Autorização atualizada.' : 'Autorização criada.',
1471| 'aut' => $autRepo->toArray($aut),
1472| ]);
1473| } catch (\Exception $e) {
1474| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => $e->getMessage()], 400);
1475| }
1476| }
1477|
1478| public function authorizationRemove(Request $request, int $id): JsonResponse
1479| {
1480| if (!$this->canAccessAuthorizationSupervisorSurface()) {
1481| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Sem permissão.'], 403);
1482| }
1483|
1484| $company = $this->currentGovernanceCompany();
1485|
1486| if (!$company) {
1487| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Empresa não encontrada.'], 403);
1488| }
1489|
1490| $em = $this->entityManager;
1491| $aut = $em->getRepository(GovernanceAuthorization::class)
1492| ->findOneBy(['id' => $id, 'company' => $company]);
1493|
1494| if (!$aut) {
1495| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Autorização não encontrada.'], 404);
1496| }
1497|
1498| /*
1499| * Quando ?force=1, o usuário já confirmou que quer remover a autorização mesmo
1500| * com vínculos existentes (ex.: autorização Inativa que ainda tem colaboradores
1501| * vinculados). Pulamos a checagem de uso — o cascade do Doctrine remove
1502| * colaboradoresVinculos (cascade={"persist","remove"} + orphanRemoval) e o
1503| * onDelete=CASCADE no banco cuida das tabelas dependentes.
1504| */
1505| $forceParam = $request->query->get('force', $request->request->get('force'));
1506| $force = in_array((string) $forceParam, ['1', 'true', 'yes', 'on'], true);
1507|
1508| if (!$force && $this->authorizationUsageService->isInUse($aut)) {
1509| $status = strtolower((string) ($aut->getStatus() ?: 'ativa'));
1510| $canForce = $status !== 'ativa';
1511|
1512| return $this->json([
1513| 'success' => false,
1514| 'in_use' => true,
1515| 'can_force' => $canForce,
1516| 'status' => $status,
1517| 'message' => $canForce
1518| ? 'Esta autorização inativa ainda possui vínculos existentes. Confirme para removê-la e todos os vínculos definitivamente.'
1519| : 'Esta autorização já está sendo utilizada por colaboradores ou registros existentes e não pode ser removida. Para impedir novos usos, altere seu status para Inativa.',
1520| ], 422);
1521| }
1522|
1523| $this->governanceCasesHubService->purgeAuthorizationCases($company, $aut);
1524|
1525| $em->remove($aut);
1526| $em->flush();
1527|
1528| return $this->json(['success' => true, 'message' => 'Autorização removida.']);
1529| }
1530|
Request #8
deepseek-v4-flash
P:41.62K C:476 CR:38.91K CW:0
4194ms
Reasoning
Very important observation: The `authorizationSave` endpoint (backend) does NOT yet handle the new fields `area_id`, `tipo`, `aprovador_id`, `aprovador_role_id`. It only validates `titulo`, `descricao`, `responsavel_id`, `requisitos`, and `contractor_requirement_dependencies`. So the new fields sent from the frontend modal would be dropped by backend. But the PR description says "conferir se authorizationSave já grava esses campos nesta entrega" (a risk flagged by the author). It appears it does not. However, that controller is outside review_files, so I can only mention this as an observation in a comment within the review files. But comments must be attached to code within the review_files.
Also, this controller is a file not part of the review group; the review plan mentions "confirmar o serviço/controller de gravação e o que mudou no SsmaAutomationService" and whether the frontend sends fields the backend persists.
Also note that `authorizationDetail` is a GET; let me look at it to see what fields are returned. This matters because `applyAutCriarModalFields` reads `aut.area_id`, etc. Let me read the detail endpoint and the toArray of the repository.
Let me check GovernanceAuthorizationRepository toArray.
Actually the key focus: the review file group only includes templates. I must comment on files within review_files only. But cross-file context is OK to confirm issues.
Let me read authorizationDetail and toArray.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Controller/GovernanceController.php", "start_line": 1565, "end_line": 1648}
Result
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php (Total lines: 6066)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1565-1648
1565| public function authorizationDetail(int $id): JsonResponse
1566| {
1567| if (!$this->canAccessAuthorizationSupervisorSurface()) {
1568| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Sem permissão.'], 403);
1569| }
1570|
1571| $company = $this->currentGovernanceCompany();
1572| if (!$company) {
1573| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Empresa não encontrada.'], 403);
1574| }
1575|
1576| $aut = $this->entityManager->getRepository(GovernanceAuthorization::class)
1577| ->findOneBy(['id' => $id, 'company' => $company]);
1578| if (!$aut) {
1579| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Autorização não encontrada.'], 404);
1580| }
1581|
1582| try {
1583| $detail = $this->buildAuthorizationDetailPayload($company, $aut);
1584|
1585| return $this->json([
1586| 'success' => true,
1587| 'title' => 'Detalhes da Autorização',
1588| 'aut_id' => $aut->getId(),
1589| 'status_real' => $detail['status_real'],
1590| 'can_manage' => $this->canManageAuthorizations(),
1591| 'html' => $this->renderView(
1592| 'governance/authorization/partials/_offcanvas_authorization_detail_body.html.twig',
1593| ['aut_detail' => $detail]
1594| ),
1595| ]);
1596| } catch (\Throwable $e) {
1597| $this->logger->warning(sprintf('[GovAuth] authorizationDetail failed for #%d: %s', $id, $e->getMessage()));
1598|
1599| return $this->json([
1600| 'success' => false,
1601| 'message' => 'Não foi possível carregar os detalhes da autorização.',
1602| ], 500);
1603| }
1604| }
1605|
1606| public function authorizationDeactivate(Request $request, int $id): JsonResponse
1607| {
1608| if (!$this->canAccessAuthorizationSupervisorSurface()) {
1609| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Sem permissão.'], 403);
1610| }
1611|
1612| $company = $this->currentGovernanceCompany();
1613| if (!$company) {
1614| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Empresa não encontrada.'], 403);
1615| }
1616|
1617| $data = json_decode($request->getContent(), true) ?? [];
1618| $motivo = trim((string) ($data['motivo'] ?? ''));
1619| if ($motivo === '') {
1620| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Informe o motivo da inativação.'], 400);
1621| }
1622|
1623| $em = $this->entityManager;
1624| $aut = $em->getRepository(GovernanceAuthorization::class)
1625| ->findOneBy(['id' => $id, 'company' => $company]);
1626| if (!$aut) {
1627| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Autorização não encontrada.'], 404);
1628| }
1629|
1630| $aut->setStatus('inativa');
1631| $em->flush();
1632|
1633| $this->appendAuthorizationUserHistory(
1634| $company,
1635| (int) $aut->getId(),
1636| 'inativou a autorização',
1637| 'Motivo: ' . $motivo,
1638| $this->currentGovernanceActorMember($company),
1639| 'authorization_deactivate',
1640| );
1641|
1642| return $this->json([
1643| 'success' => true,
1644| 'message' => 'Autorização marcada como inativa.',
1645| 'aut' => $em->getRepository(GovernanceAuthorization::class)->toArray($aut),
1646| ]);
1647| }
1648|
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Repository/GovernanceAuthorizationRepository.php"], "search_text": "function toArray"}
Result
File: src/Repository/GovernanceAuthorizationRepository.php Match lines: 1 196| public function toArray(GovernanceAuthorization $aut): array
Request #9
deepseek-v4-flash
P:43.23K C:158 CR:41.98K CW:0
2097ms
Reasoning
Let me look at toArray in the repository and buildAuthorizationDetailPayload.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Repository/GovernanceAuthorizationRepository.php", "start_line": 180, "end_line": 280}
Result
File: src/Repository/GovernanceAuthorizationRepository.php (Total lines: 277)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 180-277
180| $em->remove($vinculo);
181| $em->flush();
182| }
183|
184| public function removeAutorizacao(int $id, Company $company): void
185| {
186| $aut = $this->findOneBy(['id' => $id, 'company' => $company]);
187| if (!$aut) {
188| throw new \InvalidArgumentException('Autorização não encontrada.');
189| }
190|
191| $em = $this->getEntityManager();
192| $em->remove($aut);
193| $em->flush();
194| }
195|
196| public function toArray(GovernanceAuthorization $aut): array
197| {
198| $membros = $aut->getColaboradoresMembros();
199| usort($membros, static fn (CompanyMembers $a, CompanyMembers $b) => ($a->getId() ?? 0) <=> ($b->getId() ?? 0));
200|
201| $titulo = $aut->getTitulo();
202| $descCat = AutorizacaoTipoCatalog::descricaoPorTitulo($titulo);
203| $descGravada = $aut->getDescricao();
204| $descExibicao = $descCat ?? ($descGravada !== null && $descGravada !== '' ? $descGravada : null);
205|
206| $validadeRaw = $aut->getValidade();
207| $validadeDias = $this->parseValidadeDias($validadeRaw);
208| $emitidaDate = $aut->getEmitida();
209| $validadeExpira = null;
210|
211| if ($validadeRaw !== null && $validadeRaw !== '') {
212| if ($this->isDateString($validadeRaw)) {
213| $validadeExpira = $validadeRaw;
214| } elseif ($validadeDias !== null && $emitidaDate !== null) {
215| $expira = (clone \DateTime::createFromInterface($emitidaDate))->modify('+' . $validadeDias . ' days');
216| $validadeExpira = $expira->format('Y-m-d');
217| }
218| }
219|
220| return [
221| 'id' => $aut->getId(),
222| 'titulo' => $titulo,
223| 'descricao' => $descGravada,
224| 'descricao_exibicao' => $descExibicao,
225| 'validade' => $validadeRaw,
226| 'validade_dias' => $validadeDias,
227| 'validade_expira' => $validadeExpira,
228| 'emitida' => $emitidaDate?->format('Y-m-d'),
229| 'status' => $aut->getStatus(),
230| 'requisitos' => $aut->getRequisitosList(),
231| 'contractor_requirement_dependencies' => $aut->getContractorRequirementDependencies(),
232| 'responsavel_id' => $aut->getResponsavelMember()?->getId(),
233| 'area_id' => $aut->getArea()?->getId(),
234| 'aprovador_id' => $aut->getAprovadorMember()?->getId(),
235| 'aprovador_role_id' => $aut->getAprovadorRole()?->getId(),
236| 'tipo' => $aut->getTipo(),
237| 'colaboradores' => array_map(fn (CompanyMembers $cm) => $this->colaboradorRow($cm), $membros),
238| ];
239| }
240|
241| private function parseValidadeDias(?string $val): ?int
242| {
243| if ($val === null || $val === '') {
244| return null;
245| }
246| if (ctype_digit($val)) {
247| return (int) $val;
248| }
249|
250| return null;
251| }
252|
253| /**
254| * Returns true when the string is a Y-m-d date (SSMA flow stores expiry date directly).
255| */
256| private function isDateString(?string $val): bool
257| {
258| if ($val === null || $val === '') {
259| return false;
260| }
261|
262| return (bool) preg_match('/^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$/', $val);
263| }
264|
265| private function colaboradorRow(CompanyMembers $cm): array
266| {
267| $row = $cm->__toArray();
268|
269| return [
270| 'id' => $row['id'],
271| 'name' => $row['name'] ?? '',
272| 'avatar' => $row['avatar'] ?? null,
273| 'email' => $row['email'] ?? null,
274| ];
275| }
276|}
277|
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "function buildAuthorizationDetailPayload", "file_patterns": ["src/**"]}
Result
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php Match lines: 1 3369| private function buildAuthorizationDetailPayload(Company $company, GovernanceAuthorization $aut): array
Request #10
deepseek-v4-flash
P:44.65K C:438 CR:43.26K CW:0
4240ms
Reasoning
The `toArray` method in the repository already includes area_id, aprovador_id, aprovador_role_id, tipo. So the controller side serializes the new fields. However, in `authorizationSave`, backend doesn't appear to SET those fields from payload. Let me check the entity GovernanceAuthorization for area/aprovador setter usage. Actually authorizationSave doesn't handle area_id/tipo/aprovador_id/aprovador_role_id at all - meaning the new fields submitted by the modal won't be persisted by the backend `authorizationSave`.
Wait, but is authorizationSave within the diff? It's not in review_files, but it might have been modified in an earlier commit of the feature branch (cc-auth-config-model) and is now present. The task says review the listed files only but cross-file observations are encouraged to identify inconsistent contracts. Comments must be within review_files. We should probably verify what the entity supports, and check where the set methods are used.
Actually the key is: does the frontend's new payload (area_id, tipo, aprovador_id, aprovador_role_id) get persisted by backend? If not, it's a broken contract that the reviewer should flag (issue in review plan #4). Since authorizationSave isn't in the review_files, we could flag it referencing that the modal sends these fields (in _tab_authorizations_create.html.twig payload), but that backend code path is outside. It is legitimate to raise "confirme que authorizationSave grava esses campos" as a concern on the changed frontend line.
Let me search entity to confirm there are setters but authorizationSave not calling them. Let me read the entity file.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "setArea|setAprovadorMember|setAprovadorRole|setTipo|getArea|aprovador_role", "file_patterns": ["src/**"]}
Result
No matches found
Request #11
deepseek-v4-flash
P:45.11K C:188 CR:45.06K CW:0
2521ms
Reasoning
Hmm. The code search returned no matches? That's odd given toArray calls `$aut->getArea()`, `$aut->getAprovadorMember()`, `$aut->getAprovadorRole()`, `$aut->getTipo()`. Wait, maybe those searches fail because of the pattern combined with `|`? Let me test a simple one.
Actually maybe the code_search regex treats the `|` as alternation - should work. Let me try simpler searches individually.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "getAprovadorMember"}
Result
File: src/Entity/GovernanceAuthorization.php Match lines: 1 352| public function getAprovadorMember(): ?CompanyMembers File: src/Repository/GovernanceAuthorizationRepository.php Match lines: 1 234| 'aprovador_id' => $aut->getAprovadorMember()?->getId(),
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "aprovador_role_id"}
Result
File: docs/database-changes/2026-09-02-authorization-specific-approver-role.md
Match lines: 5
5|Permitir gravar um cargo aprovador especifico em cada autorizacao (`member_autorizacao.aprovador_role_id`), alem do membro aprovador. Quando os dois estao vazios, o fluxo continua usando os aprovadores padrao da aba Configuracoes.
9|- Nova coluna nullable `aprovador_role_id` em `member_autorizacao`, FK para `roles(id)` com `ON DELETE SET NULL`.
27|3. Depois: editar uma autorizacao, escolher um cargo aprovador e conferir `aprovador_role_id`.
34|SHOW COLUMNS FROM member_autorizacao LIKE 'aprovador_role_id';
40|SHOW COLUMNS FROM member_autorizacao LIKE 'aprovador_role_id';
File: docs/database-changes/README.md
Match lines: 1
62|- `2026-09-02-authorization-specific-approver-role.md`: cargo aprovador especifico em `member_autorizacao.aprovador_role_id` (`Version20260902160000`).
File: migrations/Version20260902160000_AuthorizationSpecificApproverRole.php
Match lines: 5
25| if (!$table->hasColumn('aprovador_role_id')) {
26| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE member_autorizacao ADD aprovador_role_id INT DEFAULT NULL');
31| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE member_autorizacao ADD CONSTRAINT FK_MA_aprovador_role FOREIGN KEY (aprovador_role_id) REFERENCES roles (id) ON DELETE SET NULL');
46| if ($table->hasColumn('aprovador_role_id')) {
47| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE member_autorizacao DROP COLUMN aprovador_role_id');
File: src/Entity/GovernanceAuthorization.php
Match lines: 1
107| * @ORM\JoinColumn(name="aprovador_role_id", referencedColumnName="id", nullable=true, onDelete="SET NULL")
File: src/Repository/GovernanceAuthorizationRepository.php
Match lines: 1
235| 'aprovador_role_id' => $aut->getAprovadorRole()?->getId(),
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig
Match lines: 2
1722| var aprovadorRoleId = aut.aprovador_role_id || (aut.aprovador_role && aut.aprovador_role.id) || '';
2067| aprovador_role_id: aprovadorRoleId || null,
Request #12
deepseek-v4-flash
P:45.99K C:141 CR:45.18K CW:0
1865ms
Reasoning
Let me check whether authorizationSave in GovernanceController sets those fields. Search for `setAprovadorRole` etc. within GovernanceController.
Tool Calls (3)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "setAprovador"}
Result
File: src/Entity/GovernanceAuthorization.php Match lines: 2 357| public function setAprovadorMember(?CompanyMembers $aprovadorMember): self 369| public function setAprovadorRole(?Roles $aprovadorRole): self
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "setArea"}
Result
File: java/src/main/java/com/metahuman/dto/cognitive_assessment/CognitiveAnswerDTO.java
Match lines: 1
26| public void setArea(String area) { this.area = area; }
File: java/src/main/java/com/metahuman/dto/cognitive_assessment/CognitiveQuestionDTO.java
Match lines: 1
23| public void setArea(String area) { this.area = area; }
File: public/js/Highcharts-8.2.0/code/highcharts-more.js
Match lines: 3
118|b.simulation=a.win.requestAnimationFrame(function(){b.step()})):b.simulation=!1)},stop:function(){this.simulation&&a.win.cancelAnimationFrame(this.simulation)},setArea:function(a,b,d,e){this.box={left:a,top:b,width:d,height:e}},setK:function(){this.k=this.options.linkLength||this.integration.getK(this)},addElementsToCollection:function(a,b){a.forEach(function(a){-1===b.indexOf(a)&&b.push(a)})},removeElementFromCollection:function(a,b){a=b.indexOf(a);-1!==a&&b.splice(a,1)},clear:function(){this.nodes.length=
142|d.nodes.forEach(function(c){c.seriesIndex===a.index&&(e=!0)});d.setArea(0,0,b.plotWidth,b.plotHeight);e||(g||(g=(new q).init(this,{mass:a.parentNodeRadius/2,marker:{radius:a.parentNodeRadius},dataLabels:{inside:!1},dataLabelOnNull:!0,degree:a.parentNodeRadius,isParentNode:!0,seriesIndex:a.index})),a.parentNode&&(g.plotX=a.parentNode.plotX,g.plotY=a.parentNode.plotY),a.parentNode=g,d.addElementsToCollection([a],d.series),d.addElementsToCollection([g],d.nodes))},drawTracker:function(){var a=this.parentNode;
145|2;a.degree=1;a.collisionNmb=1});h.setArea(0,0,this.chart.plotWidth,this.chart.plotHeight);h.addElementsToCollection([this],h.series);h.addElementsToCollection(this.points,h.nodes)},deferLayout:function(){var a=this.options.layoutAlgorithm;this.visible&&(this.addLayout(),a.splitSeries&&this.addSeriesLayout())},translate:function(){var a=this.chart,b=this.data,d=this.index,e,g=this.options.useSimulation;this.processedXData=this.xData;this.generatePoints();B(a.allDataPoints)||(a.allDataPoints=this.accumulateAllPoints(this),
File: public/js/highcharts/vendor/highcharts-more.js
Match lines: 1
7| */function(t){"object"==typeof module&&module.exports?(t.default=t,module.exports=t):"function"==typeof define&&define.amd?define("highcharts/highcharts-more",["highcharts"],function(e){return t(e),t.Highcharts=e,t}):t("undefined"!=typeof Highcharts?Highcharts:void 0)}(function(t){"use strict";var e=t?t._modules:{};function i(e,i,s,o){e.hasOwnProperty(i)||(e[i]=o.apply(null,s),"function"==typeof CustomEvent&&t.win.dispatchEvent(new CustomEvent("HighchartsModuleLoaded",{detail:{path:i,module:e[i]}})))}i(e,"Extensions/Pane/PaneComposition.js",[e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t){let{addEvent:e,correctFloat:i,defined:s,pick:o}=t;function a(t){let e;let i=this;return t&&i.pane.forEach(s=>{r(t.chartX-i.plotLeft,t.chartY-i.plotTop,s.center)&&(e=s)}),e}function r(t,e,o,a,r){let n=!0,l=o[0],h=o[1],p=Math.sqrt(Math.pow(t-l,2)+Math.pow(e-h,2));if(s(a)&&s(r)){let s=Math.atan2(i(e-h,8),i(t-l,8));r!==a&&(n=a>r?s>=a&&s<=Math.PI||s<=r&&s>=-Math.PI:s>=a&&s<=i(r,8))}return p<=Math.ceil(o[2]/2)&&n}function n(t){this.polar&&(t.options.inverted&&([t.x,t.y]=[t.y,t.x]),t.isInsidePlot=this.pane.some(e=>r(t.x,t.y,e.center,e.axis&&e.axis.normalizedStartAngleRad,e.axis&&e.axis.normalizedEndAngleRad)))}function l(t){let e=this.chart;t.hoverPoint&&t.hoverPoint.plotX&&t.hoverPoint.plotY&&e.hoverPane&&!r(t.hoverPoint.plotX,t.hoverPoint.plotY,e.hoverPane.center)&&(t.hoverPoint=void 0)}function h(t){let e=this.chart;e.polar?(e.hoverPane=e.getHoverPane(t),t.filter=function(i){return i.visible&&!(!t.shared&&i.directTouch)&&o(i.options.enableMouseTracking,!0)&&(!e.hoverPane||i.xAxis.pane===e.hoverPane)}):e.hoverPane=void 0}return{compose:function(t,i){let s=t.prototype;s.getHoverPane||(s.collectionsWithUpdate.push("pane"),s.getHoverPane=a,e(t,"afterIsInsidePlot",n),e(i,"afterGetHoverData",l),e(i,"beforeGetHoverData",h))}}}),i(e,"Extensions/Pane/PaneDefaults.js",[],function(){return{pane:{center:["50%","50%"],size:"85%",innerSize:"0%",startAngle:0},background:{shape:"circle",borderRadius:0,borderWidth:1,borderColor:"#cccccc",backgroundColor:{linearGradient:{x1:0,y1:0,x2:0,y2:1},stops:[[0,"#ffffff"],[1,"#e6e6e6"]]},from:-Number.MAX_VALUE,innerRadius:0,to:Number.MAX_VALUE,outerRadius:"105%"}}}),i(e,"Extensions/Pane/Pane.js",[e["Series/CenteredUtilities.js"],e["Extensions/Pane/PaneComposition.js"],e["Extensions/Pane/PaneDefaults.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t,e,i,s){let{extend:o,merge:a,splat:r}=s;class n{constructor(t,e){this.coll="pane",this.init(t,e)}init(t,e){this.chart=e,this.background=[],e.pane.push(this),this.setOptions(t)}setOptions(t){this.options=t=a(i.pane,this.chart.angular?{background:{}}:void 0,t)}render(){let t=this.options,e=this.chart.renderer;this.group||(this.group=e.g("pane-group").attr({zIndex:t.zIndex||0}).add()),this.updateCenter();let s=this.options.background;if(s){let t=Math.max((s=r(s)).length,this.background.length||0);for(let e=0;e<t;e++)s[e]&&this.axis?this.renderBackground(a(i.background,s[e]),e):this.background[e]&&(this.background[e]=this.background[e].destroy(),this.background.splice(e,1))}}renderBackground(t,e){let i={class:"highcharts-pane "+(t.className||"")},s="animate";this.chart.styledMode||o(i,{fill:t.backgroundColor,stroke:t.borderColor,"stroke-width":t.borderWidth}),this.background[e]||(this.background[e]=this.chart.renderer.path().add(this.group),s="attr"),this.background[e][s]({d:this.axis.getPlotBandPath(t.from,t.to,t)}).attr(i)}updateCenter(e){this.center=(e||this.axis||{}).center=t.getCenter.call(this)}update(t,e){a(!0,this.options,t),this.setOptions(this.options),this.render(),this.chart.axes.forEach(function(t){t.pane===this&&(t.pane=null,t.update({},e))},this)}}return n.compose=e.compose,n}),i(e,"Series/AreaRange/AreaRangePoint.js",[e["Core/Series/SeriesRegistry.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t,e){let{area:{prototype:{pointClass:i,pointClass:{prototype:s}}}}=t.seriesTypes,{defined:o,isNumber:a}=e;return class extends i{setState(){let t=this.state,e=this.series,i=e.chart.polar;o(this.plotHigh)||(this.plotHigh=e.yAxis.toPixels(this.high,!0)),o(this.plotLow)||(this.plotLow=this.plotY=e.yAxis.toPixels(this.low,!0)),e.lowerStateMarkerGraphic=e.stateMarkerGraphic,e.stateMarkerGraphic=e.upperStateMarkerGraphic,this.graphic=this.graphics&&this.graphics[1],this.plotY=this.plotHigh,i&&a(this.plotHighX)&&(this.plotX=this.plotHighX),s.setState.apply(this,arguments),this.state=t,this.plotY=this.plotLow,this.graphic=this.graphics&&this.graphics[0],i&&a(this.plotLowX)&&(this.plotX=this.plotLowX),e.upperStateMarkerGraphic=e.stateMarkerGraphic,e.stateMarkerGraphic=e.lowerStateMarkerGraphic,e.lowerStateMarkerGraphic=void 0;let r=e.modifyMarkerSettings();s.setState.apply(this,arguments),e.restoreMarkerSettings(r)}haloPath(){let t=this.series.chart.polar,e=[];return this.plotY=this.plotLow,t&&a(this.plotLowX)&&(this.plotX=this.plotLowX),this.isInside&&(e=s.haloPath.apply(this,arguments)),this.plotY=this.plotHigh,t&&a(this.plotHighX)&&(this.plotX=this.plotHighX),this.isTopInside&&(e=e.concat(s.haloPath.apply(this,arguments))),e}isValid(){return a(this.low)&&a(this.high)}}}),i(e,"Series/AreaRange/AreaRangeSeries.js",[e["Series/AreaRange/AreaRangePoint.js"],e["Core/Globals.js"],e["Core/Series/SeriesRegistry.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t,e,i,s){let{noop:o}=e,{area:a,area:{prototype:r},column:{prototype:n}}=i.seriesTypes,{addEvent:l,defined:h,extend:p,isArray:d,isNumber:c,pick:u,merge:g}=s;class f extends a{toYData(t){return[t.low,t.high]}highToXY(t){let e=this.chart,i=this.xAxis.postTranslate(t.rectPlotX||0,this.yAxis.len-(t.plotHigh||0));t.plotHighX=i.x-e.plotLeft,t.plotHigh=i.y-e.plotTop,t.plotLowX=t.plotX}getGraphPath(t){let e=[],i=[],s=r.getGraphPath,o=this.options,a=this.chart.polar,n=a&&!1!==o.connectEnds,l=o.connectNulls,h,p,d,c=o.step;for(h=(t=t||this.points).length;h--;){p=t[h];let s=a?{plotX:p.rectPlotX,plotY:p.yBottom,doCurve:!1}:{plotX:p.plotX,plotY:p.plotY,doCurve:!1};p.isNull||n||l||t[h+1]&&!t[h+1].isNull||i.push(s),d={polarPlotY:p.polarPlotY,rectPlotX:p.rectPlotX,yBottom:p.yBottom,plotX:u(p.plotHighX,p.plotX),plotY:p.plotHigh,isNull:p.isNull},i.push(d),e.push(d),p.isNull||n||l||t[h-1]&&!t[h-1].isNull||i.push(s)}let g=s.call(this,t);c&&(!0===c&&(c="left"),o.step=({left:"right",center:"center",right:"left"})[c]);let f=s.call(this,e),b=s.call(this,i);o.step=c;let m=[].concat(g,f);return!this.chart.polar&&b[0]&&"M"===b[0][0]&&(b[0]=["L",b[0][1],b[0][2]]),this.graphPath=m,this.areaPath=g.concat(b),m.isArea=!0,m.xMap=g.xMap,this.areaPath.xMap=g.xMap,m}drawDataLabels(){let t,e,i,s,o;let a=this.points,n=a.length,l=[],h=this.options.dataLabels,c=this.chart.inverted;if(h){if(d(h)?(s=h[0]||{enabled:!1},o=h[1]||{enabled:!1}):((s=p({},h)).x=h.xHigh,s.y=h.yHigh,(o=p({},h)).x=h.xLow,o.y=h.yLow),s.enabled||this.hasDataLabels?.()){for(t=n;t--;)if(e=a[t]){let{plotHigh:o=0,plotLow:a=0}=e;i=s.inside?o<a:o>a,e.y=e.high,e._plotY=e.plotY,e.plotY=o,l[t]=e.dataLabel,e.dataLabel=e.dataLabelUpper,e.below=i,c?s.align||(s.align=i?"right":"left"):s.verticalAlign||(s.verticalAlign=i?"top":"bottom")}for(this.options.dataLabels=s,r.drawDataLabels&&r.drawDataLabels.apply(this,arguments),t=n;t--;)(e=a[t])&&(e.dataLabelUpper=e.dataLabel,e.dataLabel=l[t],delete e.dataLabels,e.y=e.low,e.plotY=e._plotY)}if(o.enabled||this.hasDataLabels?.()){for(t=n;t--;)if(e=a[t]){let{plotHigh:t=0,plotLow:s=0}=e;i=o.inside?t<s:t>s,e.below=!i,c?o.align||(o.align=i?"left":"right"):o.verticalAlign||(o.verticalAlign=i?"bottom":"top")}this.options.dataLabels=o,r.drawDataLabels&&r.drawDataLabels.apply(this,arguments)}if(s.enabled)for(t=n;t--;)(e=a[t])&&(e.dataLabels=[e.dataLabelUpper,e.dataLabel].filter(function(t){return!!t}));this.options.dataLabels=h}}alignDataLabel(){n.alignDataLabel.apply(this,arguments)}modifyMarkerSettings(){let t={marker:this.options.marker,symbol:this.symbol};if(this.options.lowMarker){let{options:{marker:t,lowMarker:e}}=this;this.options.marker=g(t,e),e.symbol&&(this.symbol=e.symbol)}return t}restoreMarkerSettings(t){this.options.marker=t.marker,this.symbol=t.symbol}drawPoints(){let t,e;let i=this.points.length,s=this.modifyMarkerSettings();for(r.drawPoints.apply(this,arguments),this.restoreMarkerSettings(s),t=0;t<i;)(e=this.points[t]).graphics=e.graphics||[],e.origProps={plotY:e.plotY,plotX:e.plotX,isInside:e.isInside,negative:e.negative,zone:e.zone,y:e.y},(e.graphic||e.graphics[0])&&(e.graphics[0]=e.graphic),e.graphic=e.graphics[1],e.plotY=e.plotHigh,h(e.plotHighX)&&(e.plotX=e.plotHighX),e.y=u(e.high,e.origProps.y),e.negative=e.y<(this.options.threshold||0),this.zones.length&&(e.zone=e.getZone()),this.chart.polar||(e.isInside=e.isTopInside=void 0!==e.plotY&&e.plotY>=0&&e.plotY<=this.yAxis.len&&e.plotX>=0&&e.plotX<=this.xAxis.len),t++;for(r.drawPoints.apply(this,arguments),t=0;t<i;)(e=this.points[t]).graphics=e.graphics||[],(e.graphic||e.graphics[1])&&(e.graphics[1]=e.graphic),e.graphic=e.graphics[0],e.origProps&&(p(e,e.origProps),delete e.origProps),t++}hasMarkerChanged(t,e){let i=t.lowMarker,s=e.lowMarker||{};return i&&(!1===i.enabled||s.symbol!==i.symbol||s.height!==i.height||s.width!==i.width)||super.hasMarkerChanged(t,e)}}return f.defaultOptions=g(a.defaultOptions,{lineWidth:1,threshold:null,tooltip:{pointFormat:'<span style="color:{series.color}">●</span> {series.name}: <b>{point.low}</b> - <b>{point.high}</b><br/>'},trackByArea:!0,dataLabels:{align:void 0,verticalAlign:void 0,xLow:0,xHigh:0,yLow:0,yHigh:0}}),l(f,"afterTranslate",function(){"low,high"===this.pointArrayMap.join(",")&&this.points.forEach(t=>{let e=t.high,i=t.plotY;t.isNull?t.plotY=void 0:(t.plotLow=i,t.plotHigh=c(e)?this.yAxis.translate(this.dataModify?this.dataModify.modifyValue(e):e,!1,!0,void 0,!0):void 0,this.dataModify&&(t.yBottom=t.plotHigh))})},{order:0}),l(f,"afterTranslate",function(){this.points.forEach(t=>{if(this.chart.polar)this.highToXY(t),t.plotLow=t.plotY,t.tooltipPos=[((t.plotHighX||0)+(t.plotLowX||0))/2,((t.plotHigh||0)+(t.plotLow||0))/2];else{let e=t.pos(!1,t.plotLow),i=t.pos(!1,t.plotHigh);e&&i&&(e[0]=(e[0]+i[0])/2,e[1]=(e[1]+i[1])/2),t.tooltipPos=e}})},{order:3}),p(f.prototype,{deferTranslatePolar:!0,pointArrayMap:["low","high"],pointClass:t,pointValKey:"low",setStackedPoints:o}),i.registerSeriesType("arearange",f),f}),i(e,"Series/AreaSplineRange/AreaSplineRangeSeries.js",[e["Series/AreaRange/AreaRangeSeries.js"],e["Core/Series/SeriesRegistry.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t,e,i){let{spline:{prototype:s}}=e.seriesTypes,{merge:o,extend:a}=i;class r extends t{}return r.defaultOptions=o(t.defaultOptions),a(r.prototype,{getPointSpline:s.getPointSpline}),e.registerSeriesType("areasplinerange",r),r}),i(e,"Series/BoxPlot/BoxPlotSeriesDefaults.js",[],function(){return{threshold:null,tooltip:{pointFormat:'<span style="color:{point.color}">●</span> <b>{series.name}</b><br/>Maximum: {point.high}<br/>Upper quartile: {point.q3}<br/>Median: {point.median}<br/>Lower quartile: {point.q1}<br/>Minimum: {point.low}<br/>'},whiskerLength:"50%",fillColor:"#ffffff",lineWidth:1,medianWidth:2,whiskerWidth:2}}),i(e,"Series/BoxPlot/BoxPlotSeries.js",[e["Series/BoxPlot/BoxPlotSeriesDefaults.js"],e["Series/Column/ColumnSeries.js"],e["Core/Globals.js"],e["Core/Series/SeriesRegistry.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t,e,i,s,o){let{noop:a}=i,{crisp:r,extend:n,merge:l,pick:h}=o;class p extends e{pointAttribs(){return{}}translate(){let t=this.yAxis,e=this.pointArrayMap;super.translate.apply(this),this.points.forEach(function(i){e.forEach(function(e){null!==i[e]&&(i[e+"Plot"]=t.translate(i[e],0,1,0,1))}),i.plotHigh=i.highPlot})}drawPoints(){let t,e,i,s,o,a,n,l,p,d,c,u,g;let f=this.points,b=this.options,m=this.chart,y=m.renderer,x=!1!==this.doQuartiles,P=this.options.whiskerLength;for(let S of f){let f=(l=S.graphic)?"animate":"attr",M=S.shapeArgs,L={},C={},k={},v={},A=S.color||this.color;if(void 0!==S.plotY){let w;p=M.width,c=(d=M.x)+p,u=p/2,t=x?S.q1Plot:S.lowPlot,e=x?S.q3Plot:S.lowPlot,i=S.highPlot,s=S.lowPlot,l||(S.graphic=l=y.g("point").add(this.group),S.stem=y.path().addClass("highcharts-boxplot-stem").add(l),P&&(S.whiskers=y.path().addClass("highcharts-boxplot-whisker").add(l)),x&&(S.box=y.path(n).addClass("highcharts-boxplot-box").add(l)),S.medianShape=y.path(a).addClass("highcharts-boxplot-median").add(l)),m.styledMode||(C.stroke=S.stemColor||b.stemColor||A,C["stroke-width"]=h(S.stemWidth,b.stemWidth,b.lineWidth),C.dashstyle=S.stemDashStyle||b.stemDashStyle||b.dashStyle,S.stem.attr(C),P&&(k.stroke=S.whiskerColor||b.whiskerColor||A,k["stroke-width"]=h(S.whiskerWidth,b.whiskerWidth,b.lineWidth),k.dashstyle=S.whiskerDashStyle||b.whiskerDashStyle||b.dashStyle,S.whiskers.attr(k)),x&&(L.fill=S.fillColor||b.fillColor||A,L.stroke=b.lineColor||A,L["stroke-width"]=b.lineWidth||0,L.dashstyle=S.boxDashStyle||b.boxDashStyle||b.dashStyle,S.box.attr(L)),v.stroke=S.medianColor||b.medianColor||A,v["stroke-width"]=h(S.medianWidth,b.medianWidth,b.lineWidth),v.dashstyle=S.medianDashStyle||b.medianDashStyle||b.dashStyle,S.medianShape.attr(v));let T=r((S.plotX||0)+(this.pointXOffset||0)+(this.barW||0)/2,S.stem.strokeWidth());if(w=[["M",T,e],["L",T,i],["M",T,t],["L",T,s]],S.stem[f]({d:w}),x){let i=S.box.strokeWidth();t=r(t,i),e=r(e,i),w=[["M",d=r(d,i),e],["L",d,t],["L",c=r(c,i),t],["L",c,e],["L",d,e],["Z"]],S.box[f]({d:w})}if(P){let t=S.whiskers.strokeWidth();i=r(S.highPlot,t),s=r(S.lowPlot,t),w=[["M",r(T-(g="string"==typeof P&&/%$/.test(P)?u*parseFloat(P)/100:Number(P)/2)),i],["L",r(T+g),i],["M",r(T-g),s],["L",r(T+g),s]],S.whiskers[f]({d:w})}w=[["M",d,o=r(S.medianPlot,S.medianShape.strokeWidth())],["L",c,o]],S.medianShape[f]({d:w})}}}toYData(t){return[t.low,t.q1,t.median,t.q3,t.high]}}return p.defaultOptions=l(e.defaultOptions,t),n(p.prototype,{pointArrayMap:["low","q1","median","q3","high"],pointValKey:"high",drawDataLabels:a,setStackedPoints:a}),s.registerSeriesType("boxplot",p),p}),i(e,"Series/Bubble/BubbleLegendDefaults.js",[],function(){return{borderColor:void 0,borderWidth:2,className:void 0,color:void 0,connectorClassName:void 0,connectorColor:void 0,connectorDistance:60,connectorWidth:1,enabled:!1,labels:{className:void 0,allowOverlap:!1,format:"",formatter:void 0,align:"right",style:{fontSize:"0.9em",color:"#000000"},x:0,y:0},maxSize:60,minSize:10,legendIndex:0,ranges:{value:void 0,borderColor:void 0,color:void 0,connectorColor:void 0},sizeBy:"area",sizeByAbsoluteValue:!1,zIndex:1,zThreshold:0}}),i(e,"Series/Bubble/BubbleLegendItem.js",[e["Core/Color/Color.js"],e["Core/Templating.js"],e["Core/Globals.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t,e,i,s){let{parse:o}=t,{noop:a}=i,{arrayMax:r,arrayMin:n,isNumber:l,merge:h,pick:p,stableSort:d}=s;return class{constructor(t,e){this.setState=a,this.init(t,e)}init(t,e){this.options=t,this.visible=!0,this.chart=e.chart,this.legend=e}addToLegend(t){t.splice(this.options.legendIndex,0,this)}drawLegendSymbol(t){let e;let i=p(t.options.itemDistance,20),s=this.legendItem||{},o=this.options,a=o.ranges,r=o.connectorDistance;if(!a||!a.length||!l(a[0].value)){t.options.bubbleLegend.autoRanges=!0;return}d(a,function(t,e){return e.value-t.value}),this.ranges=a,this.setOptions(),this.render();let n=this.getMaxLabelSize(),h=this.ranges[0].radius,c=2*h;e=(e=r-h+n.width)>0?e:0,this.maxLabel=n,this.movementX="left"===o.labels.align?e:0,s.labelWidth=c+e+i,s.labelHeight=c+n.height/2}setOptions(){let t=this.ranges,e=this.options,i=this.chart.series[e.seriesIndex],s=this.legend.baseline,a={zIndex:e.zIndex,"stroke-width":e.borderWidth},r={zIndex:e.zIndex,"stroke-width":e.connectorWidth},n={align:this.legend.options.rtl||"left"===e.labels.align?"right":"left",zIndex:e.zIndex},l=i.options.marker.fillOpacity,d=this.chart.styledMode;t.forEach(function(c,u){d||(a.stroke=p(c.borderColor,e.borderColor,i.color),a.fill=p(c.color,e.color,1!==l?o(i.color).setOpacity(l).get("rgba"):i.color),r.stroke=p(c.connectorColor,e.connectorColor,i.color)),t[u].radius=this.getRangeRadius(c.value),t[u]=h(t[u],{center:t[0].radius-t[u].radius+s}),d||h(!0,t[u],{bubbleAttribs:h(a),connectorAttribs:h(r),labelAttribs:n})},this)}getRangeRadius(t){let e=this.options,i=this.options.seriesIndex,s=this.chart.series[i],o=e.ranges[0].value,a=e.ranges[e.ranges.length-1].value,r=e.minSize,n=e.maxSize;return s.getRadius.call(this,a,o,r,n,t)}render(){let t=this.legendItem||{},e=this.chart.renderer,i=this.options.zThreshold;for(let s of(this.symbols||(this.symbols={connectors:[],bubbleItems:[],labels:[]}),t.symbol=e.g("bubble-legend"),t.label=e.g("bubble-legend-item").css(this.legend.itemStyle||{}),t.symbol.translateX=0,t.symbol.translateY=0,t.symbol.add(t.label),t.label.add(t.group),this.ranges))s.value>=i&&this.renderRange(s);this.hideOverlappingLabels()}renderRange(t){let e=this.ranges[0],i=this.legend,s=this.options,o=s.labels,a=this.chart,r=a.series[s.seriesIndex],n=a.renderer,l=this.symbols,h=l.labels,p=t.center,d=Math.abs(t.radius),c=s.connectorDistance||0,u=o.align,g=i.options.rtl,f=s.borderWidth,b=s.connectorWidth,m=e.radius||0,y=p-d-f/2+b/2,x=(y%1?1:.5)-(b%2?0:.5),P=n.styledMode,S=g||"left"===u?-c:c;"center"===u&&(S=0,s.connectorDistance=0,t.labelAttribs.align="center"),l.bubbleItems.push(n.circle(m,p+x,d).attr(P?{}:t.bubbleAttribs).addClass((P?"highcharts-color-"+r.colorIndex+" ":"")+"highcharts-bubble-legend-symbol "+(s.className||"")).add(this.legendItem.symbol)),l.connectors.push(n.path(n.crispLine([["M",m,y],["L",m+S,y]],s.connectorWidth)).attr(P?{}:t.connectorAttribs).addClass((P?"highcharts-color-"+this.options.seriesIndex+" ":"")+"highcharts-bubble-legend-connectors "+(s.connectorClassName||"")).add(this.legendItem.symbol));let M=n.text(this.formatLabel(t)).attr(P?{}:t.labelAttribs).css(P?{}:o.style).addClass("highcharts-bubble-legend-labels "+(s.labels.className||"")).add(this.legendItem.symbol),L={x:m+S+s.labels.x,y:y+s.labels.y+.4*M.getBBox().height};M.attr(L),h.push(M),M.placed=!0,M.alignAttr=L}getMaxLabelSize(){let t,e;return this.symbols.labels.forEach(function(i){e=i.getBBox(!0),t=t?e.width>t.width?e:t:e}),t||{}}formatLabel(t){let i=this.options,s=i.labels.formatter,o=i.labels.format,{numberFormatter:a}=this.chart;return o?e.format(o,t):s?s.call(t):a(t.value,1)}hideOverlappingLabels(){let t=this.chart,e=this.options.labels.allowOverlap,i=this.symbols;!e&&i&&(t.hideOverlappingLabels(i.labels),i.labels.forEach(function(t,e){t.newOpacity?t.newOpacity!==t.oldOpacity&&i.connectors[e].show():i.connectors[e].hide()}))}getRanges(){let t=this.legend.bubbleLegend,e=t.chart.series,i=t.options.ranges,s,o,a=Number.MAX_VALUE,d=-Number.MAX_VALUE;return e.forEach(function(t){t.isBubble&&!t.ignoreSeries&&(o=t.zData.filter(l)).length&&(a=p(t.options.zMin,Math.min(a,Math.max(n(o),!1===t.options.displayNegative?t.options.zThreshold:-Number.MAX_VALUE))),d=p(t.options.zMax,Math.max(d,r(o))))}),s=a===d?[{value:d}]:[{value:a},{value:(a+d)/2},{value:d,autoRanges:!0}],i.length&&i[0].radius&&s.reverse(),s.forEach(function(t,e){i&&i[e]&&(s[e]=h(i[e],t))}),s}predictBubbleSizes(){let t=this.chart,e=t.legend.options,i=e.floating,s="horizontal"===e.layout,o=s?t.legend.lastLineHeight:0,a=t.plotSizeX,r=t.plotSizeY,n=t.series[this.options.seriesIndex],l=n.getPxExtremes(),h=Math.ceil(l.minPxSize),p=Math.ceil(l.maxPxSize),d=Math.min(r,a),c,u=n.options.maxSize;return i||!/%$/.test(u)?c=p:(c=(d+o)*(u=parseFloat(u))/100/(u/100+1),(s&&r-c>=a||!s&&a-c>=r)&&(c=p)),[h,Math.ceil(c)]}updateRanges(t,e){let i=this.legend.options.bubbleLegend;i.minSize=t,i.maxSize=e,i.ranges=this.getRanges()}correctSizes(){let t=this.legend,e=this.chart.series[this.options.seriesIndex].getPxExtremes();Math.abs(Math.ceil(e.maxPxSize)-this.options.maxSize)>1&&(this.updateRanges(this.options.minSize,e.maxPxSize),t.render())}}}),i(e,"Series/Bubble/BubbleLegendComposition.js",[e["Series/Bubble/BubbleLegendDefaults.js"],e["Series/Bubble/BubbleLegendItem.js"],e["Core/Defaults.js"],e["Core/Globals.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t,e,i,s,o){let{setOptions:a}=i,{composed:r}=s,{addEvent:n,objectEach:l,pushUnique:h,wrap:p}=o;function d(t,e,i){let s,o,a;let r=this.legend,n=c(this)>=0;r&&r.options.enabled&&r.bubbleLegend&&r.options.bubbleLegend.autoRanges&&n?(s=r.bubbleLegend.options,o=r.bubbleLegend.predictBubbleSizes(),r.bubbleLegend.updateRanges(o[0],o[1]),s.placed||(r.group.placed=!1,r.allItems.forEach(t=>{(a=t.legendItem||{}).group&&(a.group.translateY=void 0)})),r.render(),s.placed||(this.getMargins(),this.axes.forEach(function(t){t.visible&&t.render(),s.placed||(t.setScale(),t.updateNames(),l(t.ticks,function(t){t.isNew=!0,t.isNewLabel=!0}))}),this.getMargins()),s.placed=!0,t.call(this,e,i),r.bubbleLegend.correctSizes(),b(r,u(r))):(t.call(this,e,i),r&&r.options.enabled&&r.bubbleLegend&&(r.render(),b(r,u(r))))}function c(t){let e=t.series,i=0;for(;i<e.length;){if(e[i]&&e[i].isBubble&&e[i].visible&&e[i].zData.length)return i;i++}return -1}function u(t){let e=t.allItems,i=[],s=e.length,o,a,r,n=0,l=0;for(n=0;n<s;n++)if(a=e[n].legendItem||{},r=(e[n+1]||{}).legendItem||{},a.labelHeight&&(e[n].itemHeight=a.labelHeight),e[n]===e[s-1]||a.y!==r.y){for(i.push({height:0}),o=i[i.length-1];l<=n;l++)e[l].itemHeight>o.height&&(o.height=e[l].itemHeight);o.step=n}return i}function g(t){let i=this.bubbleLegend,s=this.options,o=s.bubbleLegend,a=c(this.chart);i&&i.ranges&&i.ranges.length&&(o.ranges.length&&(o.autoRanges=!!o.ranges[0].autoRanges),this.destroyItem(i)),a>=0&&s.enabled&&o.enabled&&(o.seriesIndex=a,this.bubbleLegend=new e(o,this),this.bubbleLegend.addToLegend(t.allItems))}function f(t){let e;if(t.defaultPrevented)return!1;let i=t.legendItem,s=this.chart,o=i.visible;this&&this.bubbleLegend&&(i.visible=!o,i.ignoreSeries=o,e=c(s)>=0,this.bubbleLegend.visible!==e&&(this.update({bubbleLegend:{enabled:e}}),this.bubbleLegend.visible=e),i.visible=o)}function b(t,e){let i=t.allItems,s=t.options.rtl,o,a,r,n,l=0;i.forEach((t,i)=>{(n=t.legendItem||{}).group&&(o=n.group.translateX||0,a=n.y||0,((r=t.movementX)||s&&t.ranges)&&(r=s?o-t.options.maxSize/2:o+r,n.group.attr({translateX:r})),i>e[l].step&&l++,n.group.attr({translateY:Math.round(a+e[l].height/2)}),n.y=a+e[l].height/2)})}return{compose:function(e,i){h(r,"Series.BubbleLegend")&&(a({legend:{bubbleLegend:t}}),p(e.prototype,"drawChartBox",d),n(i,"afterGetAllItems",g),n(i,"itemClick",f))}}}),i(e,"Series/Bubble/BubblePoint.js",[e["Core/Series/Point.js"],e["Core/Series/SeriesRegistry.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t,e,i){let{seriesTypes:{scatter:{prototype:{pointClass:s}}}}=e,{extend:o}=i;class a extends s{haloPath(e){let i=(e&&this.marker&&this.marker.radius||0)+e;if(this.series.chart.inverted){let t=this.pos()||[0,0],{xAxis:e,yAxis:s,chart:o}=this.series;return o.renderer.symbols.circle(e.len-t[1]-i,s.len-t[0]-i,2*i,2*i)}return t.prototype.haloPath.call(this,i)}}return o(a.prototype,{ttBelow:!1}),a}),i(e,"Series/Bubble/BubbleSeries.js",[e["Series/Bubble/BubbleLegendComposition.js"],e["Series/Bubble/BubblePoint.js"],e["Core/Color/Color.js"],e["Core/Globals.js"],e["Core/Series/SeriesRegistry.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t,e,i,s,o,a){let{parse:r}=i,{composed:n,noop:l}=s,{series:h,seriesTypes:{column:{prototype:p},scatter:d}}=o,{addEvent:c,arrayMax:u,arrayMin:g,clamp:f,extend:b,isNumber:m,merge:y,pick:x,pushUnique:P}=a;function S(){let t=this.len,{coll:e,isXAxis:i,min:s}=this,o=i?"xData":"yData",a=(this.max||0)-(s||0),r=0,n=t,l=t/a,h;("xAxis"===e||"yAxis"===e)&&(this.series.forEach(t=>{if(t.bubblePadding&&t.reserveSpace()){this.allowZoomOutside=!0,h=!0;let e=t[o];if(i&&((t.onPoint||t).getRadii(0,0,t),t.onPoint&&(t.radii=t.onPoint.radii)),a>0){let i=e.length;for(;i--;)if(m(e[i])&&this.dataMin<=e[i]&&e[i]<=this.max){let o=t.radii&&t.radii[i]||0;r=Math.min((e[i]-s)*l-o,r),n=Math.max((e[i]-s)*l+o,n)}}}}),h&&a>0&&!this.logarithmic&&(n-=t,l*=(t+Math.max(0,r)-Math.min(n,t))/t,[["min","userMin",r],["max","userMax",n]].forEach(t=>{void 0===x(this.options[t[0]],this[t[1]])&&(this[t[0]]+=t[2]/l)})))}class M extends d{static compose(e,i,s){t.compose(i,s),P(n,"Series.Bubble")&&c(e,"foundExtremes",S)}animate(t){!t&&this.points.length<this.options.animationLimit&&this.points.forEach(function(t){let{graphic:e,plotX:i=0,plotY:s=0}=t;e&&e.width&&(this.hasRendered||e.attr({x:i,y:s,width:1,height:1}),e.animate(this.markerAttribs(t),this.options.animation))},this)}getRadii(){let t=this.zData,e=this.yData,i=[],s,o,a,r=this.chart.bubbleZExtremes,{minPxSize:n,maxPxSize:l}=this.getPxExtremes();if(!r){let t,e=Number.MAX_VALUE,i=-Number.MAX_VALUE;this.chart.series.forEach(s=>{if(s.bubblePadding&&s.reserveSpace()){let o=(s.onPoint||s).getZExtremes();o&&(e=Math.min(x(e,o.zMin),o.zMin),i=Math.max(x(i,o.zMax),o.zMax),t=!0)}}),t?(r={zMin:e,zMax:i},this.chart.bubbleZExtremes=r):r={zMin:0,zMax:0}}for(o=0,s=t.length;o<s;o++)a=t[o],i.push(this.getRadius(r.zMin,r.zMax,n,l,a,e&&e[o]));this.radii=i}getRadius(t,e,i,s,o,a){let r=this.options,n="width"!==r.sizeBy,l=r.zThreshold,h=e-t,p=.5;if(null===a||null===o)return null;if(m(o)){if(r.sizeByAbsoluteValue&&(o=Math.abs(o-l),e=h=Math.max(e-l,Math.abs(t-l)),t=0),o<t)return i/2-1;h>0&&(p=(o-t)/h)}return n&&p>=0&&(p=Math.sqrt(p)),Math.ceil(i+p*(s-i))/2}hasData(){return!!this.processedXData.length}markerAttribs(t,e){let i=super.markerAttribs(t,e),{height:s=0,width:o=0}=i;return this.chart.inverted?b(i,{x:(t.plotX||0)-o/2,y:(t.plotY||0)-s/2}):i}pointAttribs(t,e){let i=this.options.marker.fillOpacity,s=h.prototype.pointAttribs.call(this,t,e);return 1!==i&&(s.fill=r(s.fill).setOpacity(i).get("rgba")),s}translate(){super.translate.call(this),this.getRadii(),this.translateBubble()}translateBubble(){let{data:t,options:e,radii:i}=this,{minPxSize:s}=this.getPxExtremes(),o=t.length;for(;o--;){let a=t[o],r=i?i[o]:0;"z"===this.zoneAxis&&(a.negative=(a.z||0)<(e.zThreshold||0)),m(r)&&r>=s/2?(a.marker=b(a.marker,{radius:r,width:2*r,height:2*r}),a.dlBox={x:a.plotX-r,y:a.plotY-r,width:2*r,height:2*r}):(a.shapeArgs=a.plotY=a.dlBox=void 0,a.isInside=!1)}}getPxExtremes(){let t=Math.min(this.chart.plotWidth,this.chart.plotHeight),e=e=>{let i;return"string"==typeof e&&(i=/%$/.test(e),e=parseInt(e,10)),i?t*e/100:e},i=e(x(this.options.minSize,8)),s=Math.max(e(x(this.options.maxSize,"20%")),i);return{minPxSize:i,maxPxSize:s}}getZExtremes(){let t=this.options,e=(this.zData||[]).filter(m);if(e.length){let i=x(t.zMin,f(g(e),!1===t.displayNegative?t.zThreshold||0:-Number.MAX_VALUE,Number.MAX_VALUE)),s=x(t.zMax,u(e));if(m(i)&&m(s))return{zMin:i,zMax:s}}}}return M.defaultOptions=y(d.defaultOptions,{dataLabels:{formatter:function(){let{numberFormatter:t}=this.series.chart,{z:e}=this.point;return m(e)?t(e,-1):""},inside:!0,verticalAlign:"middle"},animationLimit:250,marker:{lineColor:null,lineWidth:1,fillOpacity:.5,radius:null,states:{hover:{radiusPlus:0}},symbol:"circle"},minSize:8,maxSize:"20%",softThreshold:!1,states:{hover:{halo:{size:5}}},tooltip:{pointFormat:"({point.x}, {point.y}), Size: {point.z}"},turboThreshold:0,zThreshold:0,zoneAxis:"z"}),b(M.prototype,{alignDataLabel:p.alignDataLabel,applyZones:l,bubblePadding:!0,isBubble:!0,pointArrayMap:["y","z"],pointClass:e,parallelArrays:["x","y","z"],trackerGroups:["group","dataLabelsGroup"],specialGroup:"group",zoneAxis:"z"}),c(M,"updatedData",t=>{delete t.target.chart.bubbleZExtremes}),c(M,"remove",t=>{delete t.target.chart.bubbleZExtremes}),o.registerSeriesType("bubble",M),M}),i(e,"Series/ColumnRange/ColumnRangePoint.js",[e["Core/Series/SeriesRegistry.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t,e){let{seriesTypes:{column:{prototype:{pointClass:{prototype:i}}},arearange:{prototype:{pointClass:s}}}}=t,{extend:o,isNumber:a}=e;class r extends s{isValid(){return a(this.low)}}return o(r.prototype,{setState:i.setState}),r}),i(e,"Series/ColumnRange/ColumnRangeSeries.js",[e["Series/ColumnRange/ColumnRangePoint.js"],e["Core/Globals.js"],e["Core/Series/SeriesRegistry.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t,e,i,s){let{noop:o}=e,{seriesTypes:{arearange:a,column:r,column:{prototype:n}}}=i,{addEvent:l,clamp:h,extend:p,isNumber:d,merge:c,pick:u}=s;class g extends a{setOptions(){return c(!0,arguments[0],{stacking:void 0}),a.prototype.setOptions.apply(this,arguments)}translate(){return n.translate.apply(this)}pointAttribs(){return n.pointAttribs.apply(this,arguments)}translate3dPoints(){return n.translate3dPoints.apply(this,arguments)}translate3dShapes(){return n.translate3dShapes.apply(this,arguments)}afterColumnTranslate(){let t,e,i,s;let o=this.yAxis,a=this.xAxis,r=a.startAngleRad,n=this.chart,l=this.xAxis.isRadial,p=Math.max(n.chartWidth,n.chartHeight)+999;this.points.forEach(g=>{let f=g.shapeArgs||{},b=this.options.minPointLength,m=g.plotY,y=o.translate(g.high,0,1,0,1);if(d(y)&&d(m)){if(g.plotHigh=h(y,-p,p),g.plotLow=h(m,-p,p),s=g.plotHigh,Math.abs(t=u(g.rectPlotY,g.plotY)-g.plotHigh)<b?(e=b-t,t+=e,s-=e/2):t<0&&(t*=-1,s-=t),l&&this.polar)i=g.barX+r,g.shapeType="arc",g.shapeArgs=this.polar.arc(s+t,s,i,i+g.pointWidth);else{f.height=t,f.y=s;let{x:e=0,width:i=0}=f;g.shapeArgs=c(g.shapeArgs,this.crispCol(e,s,i,t)),g.tooltipPos=n.inverted?[o.len+o.pos-n.plotLeft-s-t/2,a.len+a.pos-n.plotTop-e-i/2,t]:[a.left-n.plotLeft+e+i/2,o.pos-n.plotTop+s+t/2,t]}}})}}return g.defaultOptions=c(r.defaultOptions,a.defaultOptions,{borderRadius:{where:"all"},pointRange:null,legendSymbol:"rectangle",marker:null,states:{hover:{halo:!1}}}),l(g,"afterColumnTranslate",function(){g.prototype.afterColumnTranslate.apply(this)},{order:5}),p(g.prototype,{directTouch:!0,pointClass:t,trackerGroups:["group","dataLabelsGroup"],adjustForMissingColumns:n.adjustForMissingColumns,animate:n.animate,crispCol:n.crispCol,drawGraph:o,drawPoints:n.drawPoints,getSymbol:o,drawTracker:n.drawTracker,getColumnMetrics:n.getColumnMetrics}),i.registerSeriesType("columnrange",g),g}),i(e,"Series/ColumnPyramid/ColumnPyramidSeriesDefaults.js",[],function(){return{}}),i(e,"Series/ColumnPyramid/ColumnPyramidSeries.js",[e["Series/ColumnPyramid/ColumnPyramidSeriesDefaults.js"],e["Core/Series/SeriesRegistry.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t,e,i){let{column:s}=e.seriesTypes,{clamp:o,merge:a,pick:r}=i;class n extends s{translate(){let t=this.chart,e=this.options,i=this.dense=this.closestPointRange*this.xAxis.transA<2,s=this.borderWidth=r(e.borderWidth,i?0:1),a=this.yAxis,n=e.threshold,l=r(e.minPointLength,5),h=this.getColumnMetrics(),p=h.width,d=this.pointXOffset=h.offset,c=this.translatedThreshold=a.getThreshold(n),u=this.barW=Math.max(p,1+2*s);for(let i of(t.inverted&&(c-=.5),e.pointPadding&&(u=Math.ceil(u)),super.translate(),this.points)){let s=r(i.yBottom,c),g=999+Math.abs(s),f=o(i.plotY,-g,a.len+g),b=u/2,m=Math.min(f,s),y=Math.max(f,s)-m,x=i.plotX+d,P,S,M,L,C,k,v,A,w,T,N;e.centerInCategory&&(x=this.adjustForMissingColumns(x,p,i,h)),i.barX=x,i.pointWidth=p,i.tooltipPos=t.inverted?[a.len+a.pos-t.plotLeft-f,this.xAxis.len-x-b,y]:[x+b,f+a.pos-t.plotTop,y],P=n+(i.total||i.y),"percent"===e.stacking&&(P=n+(i.y<0)?-100:100);let X=a.toPixels(P,!0);M=(S=t.plotHeight-X-(t.plotHeight-c))?b*(m-X)/S:0,L=S?b*(m+y-X)/S:0,k=x-M+b,v=x+M+b,A=x+L+b,w=x-L+b,T=m-l,N=m+y,i.y<0&&(T=m,N=m+y+l),t.inverted&&(C=a.width-m,S=X-(a.width-c),M=b*(X-C)/S,L=b*(X-(C-y))/S,v=(k=x+b+M)-2*M,A=x-L+b,w=x+L+b,T=m,N=m+y-l,i.y<0&&(N=m+y+l)),i.shapeType="path",i.shapeArgs={x:k,y:T,width:v-k,height:y,d:[["M",k,T],["L",v,T],["L",A,N],["L",w,N],["Z"]]}}}}return n.defaultOptions=a(s.defaultOptions,t),e.registerSeriesType("columnpyramid",n),n}),i(e,"Series/ErrorBar/ErrorBarSeriesDefaults.js",[],function(){return{color:"#000000",grouping:!1,linkedTo:":previous",tooltip:{pointFormat:'<span style="color:{point.color}">●</span> {series.name}: <b>{point.low}</b> - <b>{point.high}</b><br/>'},whiskerWidth:null}}),i(e,"Series/ErrorBar/ErrorBarSeries.js",[e["Series/BoxPlot/BoxPlotSeries.js"],e["Series/Column/ColumnSeries.js"],e["Series/ErrorBar/ErrorBarSeriesDefaults.js"],e["Core/Series/SeriesRegistry.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t,e,i,s,o){let{arearange:a}=s.seriesTypes,{addEvent:r,merge:n,extend:l}=o;class h extends t{getColumnMetrics(){return this.linkedParent&&this.linkedParent.columnMetrics||e.prototype.getColumnMetrics.call(this)}drawDataLabels(){let t=this.pointValKey;if(a)for(let e of(a.prototype.drawDataLabels.call(this),this.points))e.y=e[t]}toYData(t){return[t.low,t.high]}}return h.defaultOptions=n(t.defaultOptions,i),r(h,"afterTranslate",function(){for(let t of this.points)t.plotLow=t.plotY},{order:0}),l(h.prototype,{pointArrayMap:["low","high"],pointValKey:"high",doQuartiles:!1}),s.registerSeriesType("errorbar",h),h}),i(e,"Series/Gauge/GaugePoint.js",[e["Core/Series/SeriesRegistry.js"]],function(t){let{series:{prototype:{pointClass:e}}}=t;return class extends e{setState(t){this.state=t}}}),i(e,"Series/Gauge/GaugeSeries.js",[e["Series/Gauge/GaugePoint.js"],e["Core/Globals.js"],e["Core/Series/SeriesRegistry.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t,e,i,s){let{noop:o}=e,{series:a,seriesTypes:{column:r}}=i,{clamp:n,isNumber:l,extend:h,merge:p,pick:d,pInt:c,defined:u}=s;class g extends a{translate(){let t=this.yAxis,e=this.options,i=t.center;this.generatePoints(),this.points.forEach(s=>{let o=p(e.dial,s.dial),a=c(o.radius)*i[2]/200,r=c(o.baseLength)*a/100,h=c(o.rearLength)*a/100,d=o.baseWidth,g=o.topWidth,f=e.overshoot,b=t.startAngleRad+t.translate(s.y,void 0,void 0,void 0,!0);(l(f)||!1===e.wrap)&&(f=l(f)?f/180*Math.PI:0,b=n(b,t.startAngleRad-f,t.endAngleRad+f)),b=180*b/Math.PI,s.shapeType="path";let m=o.path||[["M",-h,-d/2],["L",r,-d/2],["L",a,-g/2],["L",a,g/2],["L",r,d/2],["L",-h,d/2],["Z"]];s.shapeArgs={d:m,translateX:i[0],translateY:i[1],rotation:b},s.plotX=i[0],s.plotY=i[1],u(s.y)&&t.max-t.min&&(s.percentage=(s.y-t.min)/(t.max-t.min)*100)})}drawPoints(){let t=this,e=t.chart,i=t.yAxis.center,s=t.pivot,o=t.options,a=o.pivot,r=e.renderer;t.points.forEach(i=>{let s=i.graphic,a=i.shapeArgs,n=a.d,l=p(o.dial,i.dial);s?(s.animate(a),a.d=n):i.graphic=r[i.shapeType](a).addClass("highcharts-dial").add(t.group),e.styledMode||i.graphic[s?"animate":"attr"]({stroke:l.borderColor,"stroke-width":l.borderWidth,fill:l.backgroundColor})}),s?s.animate({translateX:i[0],translateY:i[1]}):a&&(t.pivot=r.circle(0,0,a.radius).attr({zIndex:2}).addClass("highcharts-pivot").translate(i[0],i[1]).add(t.group),e.styledMode||t.pivot.attr({fill:a.backgroundColor,stroke:a.borderColor,"stroke-width":a.borderWidth}))}animate(t){let e=this;t||e.points.forEach(t=>{let i=t.graphic;i&&(i.attr({rotation:180*e.yAxis.startAngleRad/Math.PI}),i.animate({rotation:t.shapeArgs.rotation},e.options.animation))})}render(){this.group=this.plotGroup("group","series",this.visible?"inherit":"hidden",this.options.zIndex,this.chart.seriesGroup),a.prototype.render.call(this),this.group.clip(this.chart.clipRect)}setData(t,e){a.prototype.setData.call(this,t,!1),this.processData(),this.generatePoints(),d(e,!0)&&this.chart.redraw()}hasData(){return!!this.points.length}}return g.defaultOptions=p(a.defaultOptions,{dataLabels:{borderColor:"#cccccc",borderRadius:3,borderWidth:1,crop:!1,defer:!1,enabled:!0,verticalAlign:"top",y:15,zIndex:2},dial:{backgroundColor:"#000000",baseLength:"70%",baseWidth:3,borderColor:"#cccccc",borderWidth:0,radius:"80%",rearLength:"10%",topWidth:1},pivot:{radius:5,borderWidth:0,borderColor:"#cccccc",backgroundColor:"#000000"},tooltip:{headerFormat:""},showInLegend:!1}),h(g.prototype,{angular:!0,directTouch:!0,drawGraph:o,drawTracker:r.prototype.drawTracker,fixedBox:!0,forceDL:!0,noSharedTooltip:!0,pointClass:t,trackerGroups:["group","dataLabelsGroup"]}),i.registerSeriesType("gauge",g),g}),i(e,"Series/DragNodesComposition.js",[e["Core/Globals.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t,e){let{composed:i}=t,{addEvent:s,pushUnique:o}=e;function a(){let t,e,i;let o=this;o.container&&(t=s(o.container,"mousedown",t=>{let a=o.hoverPoint;a&&a.series&&a.series.hasDraggableNodes&&a.series.options.draggable&&(a.series.onMouseDown(a,t),e=s(o.container,"mousemove",t=>a&&a.series&&a.series.onMouseMove(a,t)),i=s(o.container.ownerDocument,"mouseup",t=>(e(),i(),a&&a.series&&a.series.onMouseUp(a,t))))})),s(o,"destroy",function(){t()})}return{compose:function(t){o(i,"DragNodes")&&s(t,"load",a)},onMouseDown:function(t,e){let i=this.chart.pointer?.normalize(e)||e;t.fixedPosition={chartX:i.chartX,chartY:i.chartY,plotX:t.plotX,plotY:t.plotY},t.inDragMode=!0},onMouseMove:function(t,e){if(t.fixedPosition&&t.inDragMode){let i,s;let o=this.chart,a=o.pointer?.normalize(e)||e,r=t.fixedPosition.chartX-a.chartX,n=t.fixedPosition.chartY-a.chartY,l=o.graphLayoutsLookup;(Math.abs(r)>5||Math.abs(n)>5)&&(i=t.fixedPosition.plotX-r,s=t.fixedPosition.plotY-n,o.isInsidePlot(i,s)&&(t.plotX=i,t.plotY=s,t.hasDragged=!0,this.redrawHalo(t),l.forEach(t=>{t.restartSimulation()})))}},onMouseUp:function(t){t.fixedPosition&&(t.hasDragged&&(this.layout.enableSimulation?this.layout.start():this.chart.redraw()),t.inDragMode=t.hasDragged=!1,this.options.fixedDraggable||delete t.fixedPosition)},redrawHalo:function(t){t&&this.halo&&this.halo.attr({d:t.haloPath(this.options.states.hover.halo.size)})}}}),i(e,"Series/GraphLayoutComposition.js",[e["Core/Animation/AnimationUtilities.js"],e["Core/Globals.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t,e,i){let{setAnimation:s}=t,{composed:o}=e,{addEvent:a,pushUnique:r}=i;function n(){this.graphLayoutsLookup&&(this.graphLayoutsLookup.forEach(t=>{t.updateSimulation()}),this.redraw())}function l(){this.graphLayoutsLookup&&(this.graphLayoutsLookup.forEach(t=>{t.updateSimulation(!1)}),this.redraw())}function h(){this.graphLayoutsLookup&&this.graphLayoutsLookup.forEach(t=>{t.stop()})}function p(){let t,e=!1,i=i=>{i.maxIterations--&&isFinite(i.temperature)&&!i.isStable()&&!i.enableSimulation&&(i.beforeStep&&i.beforeStep(),i.step(),t=!1,e=!0)};if(this.graphLayoutsLookup){for(s(!1,this),this.graphLayoutsLookup.forEach(t=>t.start());!t;)t=!0,this.graphLayoutsLookup.forEach(i);e&&this.series.forEach(t=>{t&&t.layout&&t.render()})}}return{compose:function(t){r(o,"GraphLayout")&&(a(t,"afterPrint",n),a(t,"beforePrint",l),a(t,"predraw",h),a(t,"render",p))},integrations:{},layouts:{}}}),i(e,"Series/PackedBubble/PackedBubblePoint.js",[e["Core/Chart/Chart.js"],e["Core/Series/Point.js"],e["Core/Series/SeriesRegistry.js"]],function(t,e,i){let{seriesTypes:{bubble:{prototype:{pointClass:s}}}}=i;return class extends s{destroy(){return this.series?.layout&&this.series.layout.removeElementFromCollection(this,this.series.layout.nodes),e.prototype.destroy.apply(this,arguments)}firePointEvent(){let t=this.series.options;if(this.isParentNode&&t.parentNode){let i=t.allowPointSelect;t.allowPointSelect=t.parentNode.allowPointSelect,e.prototype.firePointEvent.apply(this,arguments),t.allowPointSelect=i}else e.prototype.firePointEvent.apply(this,arguments)}select(){let i=this.series.chart;this.isParentNode?(i.getSelectedPoints=i.getSelectedParentNodes,e.prototype.select.apply(this,arguments),i.getSelectedPoints=t.prototype.getSelectedPoints):e.prototype.select.apply(this,arguments)}}}),i(e,"Series/PackedBubble/PackedBubbleSeriesDefaults.js",[e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t){let{isNumber:e}=t;return{minSize:"10%",maxSize:"50%",sizeBy:"area",zoneAxis:"y",crisp:!1,tooltip:{pointFormat:"Value: {point.value}"},draggable:!0,useSimulation:!0,parentNode:{allowPointSelect:!1},dataLabels:{formatter:function(){let{numberFormatter:t}=this.series.chart,{value:i}=this.point;return e(i)?t(i,-1):""},parentNodeFormatter:function(){return this.name},parentNodeTextPath:{enabled:!0},padding:0,style:{transition:"opacity 2000ms"}},layoutAlgorithm:{initialPositions:"circle",initialPositionRadius:20,bubblePadding:5,parentNodeLimit:!1,seriesInteraction:!0,dragBetweenSeries:!1,parentNodeOptions:{maxIterations:400,gravitationalConstant:.03,maxSpeed:50,initialPositionRadius:100,seriesInteraction:!0,marker:{fillColor:null,fillOpacity:1,lineWidth:null,lineColor:null,symbol:"circle"}},enableSimulation:!0,type:"packedbubble",integration:"packedbubble",maxIterations:1e3,splitSeries:!1,maxSpeed:5,gravitationalConstant:.01,friction:-.981}}}),i(e,"Series/Networkgraph/VerletIntegration.js",[],function(){return{attractive:function(t,e,i){let s=t.getMass(),o=-i.x*e*this.diffTemperature,a=-i.y*e*this.diffTemperature;t.fromNode.fixedPosition||(t.fromNode.plotX-=o*s.fromNode/t.fromNode.degree,t.fromNode.plotY-=a*s.fromNode/t.fromNode.degree),t.toNode.fixedPosition||(t.toNode.plotX+=o*s.toNode/t.toNode.degree,t.toNode.plotY+=a*s.toNode/t.toNode.degree)},attractiveForceFunction:function(t,e){return(e-t)/t},barycenter:function(){let t=this.options.gravitationalConstant||0,e=(this.barycenter.xFactor-(this.box.left+this.box.width)/2)*t,i=(this.barycenter.yFactor-(this.box.top+this.box.height)/2)*t;this.nodes.forEach(function(t){t.fixedPosition||(t.plotX-=e/t.mass/t.degree,t.plotY-=i/t.mass/t.degree)})},getK:function(t){return Math.pow(t.box.width*t.box.height/t.nodes.length,.5)},integrate:function(t,e){let i=-t.options.friction,s=t.options.maxSpeed,o=e.prevX,a=e.prevY,r=(e.plotX+e.dispX-o)*i,n=(e.plotY+e.dispY-a)*i,l=Math.abs,h=l(r)/(r||1),p=l(n)/(n||1),d=h*Math.min(s,Math.abs(r)),c=p*Math.min(s,Math.abs(n));e.prevX=e.plotX+e.dispX,e.prevY=e.plotY+e.dispY,e.plotX+=d,e.plotY+=c,e.temperature=t.vectorLength({x:d,y:c})},repulsive:function(t,e,i){let s=e*this.diffTemperature/t.mass/t.degree;t.fixedPosition||(t.plotX+=i.x*s,t.plotY+=i.y*s)},repulsiveForceFunction:function(t,e){return(e-t)/t*(e>t?1:0)}}}),i(e,"Series/PackedBubble/PackedBubbleIntegration.js",[e["Core/Globals.js"],e["Series/Networkgraph/VerletIntegration.js"]],function(t,e){let{noop:i}=t;return{barycenter:function(){let t,e;let i=this.options.gravitationalConstant,s=this.box,o=this.nodes;for(let a of o)this.options.splitSeries&&!a.isParentNode?(t=a.series.parentNode.plotX,e=a.series.parentNode.plotY):(t=s.width/2,e=s.height/2),a.fixedPosition||(a.plotX-=(a.plotX-t)*i/(a.mass*Math.sqrt(o.length)),a.plotY-=(a.plotY-e)*i/(a.mass*Math.sqrt(o.length)))},getK:i,integrate:e.integrate,repulsive:function(t,e,i,s){let o=e*this.diffTemperature/t.mass/t.degree,a=i.x*o,r=i.y*o;t.fixedPosition||(t.plotX+=a,t.plotY+=r),s.fixedPosition||(s.plotX-=a,s.plotY-=r)},repulsiveForceFunction:function(t,e,i,s){return Math.min(t,(i.marker.radius+s.marker.radius)/2)}}}),i(e,"Series/Networkgraph/EulerIntegration.js",[],function(){return{attractive:function(t,e,i,s){let o=t.getMass(),a=i.x/s*e,r=i.y/s*e;t.fromNode.fixedPosition||(t.fromNode.dispX-=a*o.fromNode/t.fromNode.degree,t.fromNode.dispY-=r*o.fromNode/t.fromNode.degree),t.toNode.fixedPosition||(t.toNode.dispX+=a*o.toNode/t.toNode.degree,t.toNode.dispY+=r*o.toNode/t.toNode.degree)},attractiveForceFunction:function(t,e){return t*t/e},barycenter:function(){let t=this.options.gravitationalConstant,e=this.barycenter.xFactor,i=this.barycenter.yFactor;this.nodes.forEach(function(s){if(!s.fixedPosition){let o=s.getDegree(),a=o*(1+o/2);s.dispX+=(e-s.plotX)*t*a/s.degree,s.dispY+=(i-s.plotY)*t*a/s.degree}})},getK:function(t){return Math.pow(t.box.width*t.box.height/t.nodes.length,.3)},integrate:function(t,e){e.dispX+=e.dispX*t.options.friction,e.dispY+=e.dispY*t.options.friction;let i=e.temperature=t.vectorLength({x:e.dispX,y:e.dispY});0!==i&&(e.plotX+=e.dispX/i*Math.min(Math.abs(e.dispX),t.temperature),e.plotY+=e.dispY/i*Math.min(Math.abs(e.dispY),t.temperature))},repulsive:function(t,e,i,s){t.dispX+=i.x/s*e/t.degree,t.dispY+=i.y/s*e/t.degree},repulsiveForceFunction:function(t,e){return e*e/t}}}),i(e,"Series/Networkgraph/QuadTreeNode.js",[],function(){class t{constructor(t){this.body=!1,this.isEmpty=!1,this.isInternal=!1,this.nodes=[],this.box=t,this.boxSize=Math.min(t.width,t.height)}divideBox(){let e=this.box.width/2,i=this.box.height/2;this.nodes[0]=new t({left:this.box.left,top:this.box.top,width:e,height:i}),this.nodes[1]=new t({left:this.box.left+e,top:this.box.top,width:e,height:i}),this.nodes[2]=new t({left:this.box.left+e,top:this.box.top+i,width:e,height:i}),this.nodes[3]=new t({left:this.box.left,top:this.box.top+i,width:e,height:i})}getBoxPosition(t){let e=t.plotX<this.box.left+this.box.width/2,i=t.plotY<this.box.top+this.box.height/2;return e?i?0:3:i?1:2}insert(e,i){let s;this.isInternal?this.nodes[this.getBoxPosition(e)].insert(e,i-1):(this.isEmpty=!1,this.body?i?(this.isInternal=!0,this.divideBox(),!0!==this.body&&(this.nodes[this.getBoxPosition(this.body)].insert(this.body,i-1),this.body=!0),this.nodes[this.getBoxPosition(e)].insert(e,i-1)):((s=new t({top:e.plotX||NaN,left:e.plotY||NaN,width:.1,height:.1})).body=e,s.isInternal=!1,this.nodes.push(s)):(this.isInternal=!1,this.body=e))}updateMassAndCenter(){let t=0,e=0,i=0;if(this.isInternal){for(let s of this.nodes)s.isEmpty||(t+=s.mass,e+=s.plotX*s.mass,i+=s.plotY*s.mass);e/=t,i/=t}else this.body&&(t=this.body.mass,e=this.body.plotX,i=this.body.plotY);this.mass=t,this.plotX=e,this.plotY=i}}return t}),i(e,"Series/Networkgraph/QuadTree.js",[e["Series/Networkgraph/QuadTreeNode.js"]],function(t){return class{constructor(e,i,s,o){this.box={left:e,top:i,width:s,height:o},this.maxDepth=25,this.root=new t(this.box),this.root.isInternal=!0,this.root.isRoot=!0,this.root.divideBox()}calculateMassAndCenter(){this.visitNodeRecursive(null,null,function(t){t.updateMassAndCenter()})}insertNodes(t){for(let e of t)this.root.insert(e,this.maxDepth)}visitNodeRecursive(t,e,i){let s;if(t||(t=this.root),t===this.root&&e&&(s=e(t)),!1!==s){for(let o of t.nodes){if(o.isInternal){if(e&&(s=e(o)),!1===s)continue;this.visitNodeRecursive(o,e,i)}else o.body&&e&&e(o.body);i&&i(o)}t===this.root&&i&&i(t)}}}}),i(e,"Series/Networkgraph/ReingoldFruchtermanLayout.js",[e["Series/Networkgraph/EulerIntegration.js"],e["Core/Globals.js"],e["Series/GraphLayoutComposition.js"],e["Series/Networkgraph/QuadTree.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"],e["Series/Networkgraph/VerletIntegration.js"]],function(t,e,i,s,o,a){let{win:r}=e,{clamp:n,defined:l,isFunction:h,fireEvent:p,pick:d}=o;class c{constructor(){this.box={},this.currentStep=0,this.initialRendering=!0,this.links=[],this.nodes=[],this.series=[],this.simulation=!1}static compose(e){i.compose(e),i.integrations.euler=t,i.integrations.verlet=a,i.layouts["reingold-fruchterman"]=c}init(t){this.options=t,this.nodes=[],this.links=[],this.series=[],this.box={x:0,y:0,width:0,height:0},this.setInitialRendering(!0),this.integration=i.integrations[t.integration],this.enableSimulation=t.enableSimulation,this.attractiveForce=d(t.attractiveForce,this.integration.attractiveForceFunction),this.repulsiveForce=d(t.repulsiveForce,this.integration.repulsiveForceFunction),this.approximation=t.approximation}updateSimulation(t){this.enableSimulation=d(t,this.options.enableSimulation)}start(){let t=this.series,e=this.options;this.currentStep=0,this.forces=t[0]&&t[0].forces||[],this.chart=t[0]&&t[0].chart,this.initialRendering&&(this.initPositions(),t.forEach(function(t){t.finishedAnimating=!0,t.render()})),this.setK(),this.resetSimulation(e),this.enableSimulation&&this.step()}step(){let t=this.series;for(let t of(this.currentStep++,"barnes-hut"===this.approximation&&(this.createQuadTree(),this.quadTree.calculateMassAndCenter()),this.forces||[]))this[t+"Forces"](this.temperature);if(this.applyLimits(),this.temperature=this.coolDown(this.startTemperature,this.diffTemperature,this.currentStep),this.prevSystemTemperature=this.systemTemperature,this.systemTemperature=this.getSystemTemperature(),this.enableSimulation){for(let e of t)e.chart&&e.render();this.maxIterations--&&isFinite(this.temperature)&&!this.isStable()?(this.simulation&&r.cancelAnimationFrame(this.simulation),this.simulation=r.requestAnimationFrame(()=>this.step())):(this.simulation=!1,this.series.forEach(t=>{p(t,"afterSimulation")}))}}stop(){this.simulation&&r.cancelAnimationFrame(this.simulation)}setArea(t,e,i,s){this.box={left:t,top:e,width:i,height:s}}setK(){this.k=this.options.linkLength||this.integration.getK(this)}addElementsToCollection(t,e){for(let i of t)-1===e.indexOf(i)&&e.push(i)}removeElementFromCollection(t,e){let i=e.indexOf(t);-1!==i&&e.splice(i,1)}clear(){this.nodes.length=0,this.links.length=0,this.series.length=0,this.resetSimulation()}resetSimulation(){this.forcedStop=!1,this.systemTemperature=0,this.setMaxIterations(),this.setTemperature(),this.setDiffTemperature()}restartSimulation(){this.simulation?this.resetSimulation():(this.setInitialRendering(!1),this.enableSimulation?this.start():this.setMaxIterations(1),this.chart&&this.chart.redraw(),this.setInitialRendering(!0))}setMaxIterations(t){this.maxIterations=d(t,this.options.maxIterations)}setTemperature(){this.temperature=this.startTemperature=Math.sqrt(this.nodes.length)}setDiffTemperature(){this.diffTemperature=this.startTemperature/(this.options.maxIterations+1)}setInitialRendering(t){this.initialRendering=t}createQuadTree(){this.quadTree=new s(this.box.left,this.box.top,this.box.width,this.box.height),this.quadTree.insertNodes(this.nodes)}initPositions(){let t=this.options.initialPositions;if(h(t))for(let e of(t.call(this),this.nodes))l(e.prevX)||(e.prevX=e.plotX),l(e.prevY)||(e.prevY=e.plotY),e.dispX=0,e.dispY=0;else"circle"===t?this.setCircularPositions():this.setRandomPositions()}setCircularPositions(){let t;let e=this.box,i=this.nodes,s=2*Math.PI/(i.length+1),o=i.filter(function(t){return 0===t.linksTo.length}),a={},r=this.options.initialPositionRadius,n=t=>{for(let e of t.linksFrom||[])a[e.toNode.id]||(a[e.toNode.id]=!0,l.push(e.toNode),n(e.toNode))},l=[];for(let t of o)l.push(t),n(t);if(l.length)for(let t of i)-1===l.indexOf(t)&&l.push(t);else l=i;for(let i=0,o=l.length;i<o;++i)(t=l[i]).plotX=t.prevX=d(t.plotX,e.width/2+r*Math.cos(i*s)),t.plotY=t.prevY=d(t.plotY,e.height/2+r*Math.sin(i*s)),t.dispX=0,t.dispY=0}setRandomPositions(){let t;let e=this.box,i=this.nodes,s=i.length+1,o=t=>{let e=t*t/Math.PI;return e-Math.floor(e)};for(let a=0,r=i.length;a<r;++a)(t=i[a]).plotX=t.prevX=d(t.plotX,e.width*o(a)),t.plotY=t.prevY=d(t.plotY,e.height*o(s+a)),t.dispX=0,t.dispY=0}force(t,...e){this.integration[t].apply(this,e)}barycenterForces(){this.getBarycenter(),this.force("barycenter")}getBarycenter(){let t=0,e=0,i=0;for(let s of this.nodes)e+=s.plotX*s.mass,i+=s.plotY*s.mass,t+=s.mass;return this.barycenter={x:e,y:i,xFactor:e/t,yFactor:i/t},this.barycenter}barnesHutApproximation(t,e){let i,s;let o=this.getDistXY(t,e),a=this.vectorLength(o);return t!==e&&0!==a&&(e.isInternal?e.boxSize/a<this.options.theta&&0!==a?(s=this.repulsiveForce(a,this.k),this.force("repulsive",t,s*e.mass,o,a),i=!1):i=!0:(s=this.repulsiveForce(a,this.k),this.force("repulsive",t,s*e.mass,o,a))),i}repulsiveForces(){if("barnes-hut"===this.approximation)for(let t of this.nodes)this.quadTree.visitNodeRecursive(null,e=>this.barnesHutApproximation(t,e));else{let t,e,i;for(let s of this.nodes)for(let o of this.nodes)s===o||s.fixedPosition||(i=this.getDistXY(s,o),0!==(e=this.vectorLength(i))&&(t=this.repulsiveForce(e,this.k),this.force("repulsive",s,t*o.mass,i,e)))}}attractiveForces(){let t,e,i;for(let s of this.links)s.fromNode&&s.toNode&&(t=this.getDistXY(s.fromNode,s.toNode),0!==(e=this.vectorLength(t))&&(i=this.attractiveForce(e,this.k),this.force("attractive",s,i,t,e)))}applyLimits(){for(let t of this.nodes)t.fixedPosition||(this.integration.integrate(this,t),this.applyLimitBox(t,this.box),t.dispX=0,t.dispY=0)}applyLimitBox(t,e){let i=t.radius;t.plotX=n(t.plotX,e.left+i,e.width-i),t.plotY=n(t.plotY,e.top+i,e.height-i)}coolDown(t,e,i){return t-e*i}isStable(){return 1e-5>Math.abs(this.systemTemperature-this.prevSystemTemperature)||this.temperature<=0}getSystemTemperature(){let t=0;for(let e of this.nodes)t+=e.temperature;return t}vectorLength(t){return Math.sqrt(t.x*t.x+t.y*t.y)}getDistR(t,e){let i=this.getDistXY(t,e);return this.vectorLength(i)}getDistXY(t,e){let i=t.plotX-e.plotX,s=t.plotY-e.plotY;return{x:i,y:s,absX:Math.abs(i),absY:Math.abs(s)}}}return c}),i(e,"Series/PackedBubble/PackedBubbleLayout.js",[e["Series/GraphLayoutComposition.js"],e["Series/PackedBubble/PackedBubbleIntegration.js"],e["Series/Networkgraph/ReingoldFruchtermanLayout.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t,e,i,s){let{addEvent:o,pick:a}=s;function r(){let t=this.series,e=[];return t.forEach(t=>{t.parentNode&&t.parentNode.selected&&e.push(t.parentNode)}),e}function n(){this.allDataPoints&&delete this.allDataPoints}class l extends i{constructor(){super(...arguments),this.index=NaN,this.nodes=[],this.series=[]}static compose(s){i.compose(s),t.integrations.packedbubble=e,t.layouts.packedbubble=l;let a=s.prototype;a.getSelectedParentNodes||(o(s,"beforeRedraw",n),a.getSelectedParentNodes=r)}beforeStep(){this.options.marker&&this.series.forEach(t=>{t&&t.calculateParentRadius()})}isStable(){let t=Math.abs(this.prevSystemTemperature-this.systemTemperature);return 1>Math.abs(10*this.systemTemperature/Math.sqrt(this.nodes.length))&&t<1e-5||this.temperature<=0}setCircularPositions(){let t=this.box,e=this.nodes,i=2*Math.PI/(e.length+1),s=this.options.initialPositionRadius,o,r,n=0;for(let l of e)this.options.splitSeries&&!l.isParentNode?(o=l.series.parentNode.plotX,r=l.series.parentNode.plotY):(o=t.width/2,r=t.height/2),l.plotX=l.prevX=a(l.plotX,o+s*Math.cos(l.index||n*i)),l.plotY=l.prevY=a(l.plotY,r+s*Math.sin(l.index||n*i)),l.dispX=0,l.dispY=0,n++}repulsiveForces(){let t,e,i;let s=this,o=s.options.bubblePadding,a=s.nodes;a.forEach(r=>{r.degree=r.mass,r.neighbours=0,a.forEach(a=>{t=0,r!==a&&!r.fixedPosition&&(s.options.seriesInteraction||r.series===a.series)&&(i=s.getDistXY(r,a),(e=s.vectorLength(i)-(r.marker.radius+a.marker.radius+o))<0&&(r.degree+=.01,r.neighbours++,t=s.repulsiveForce(-e/Math.sqrt(r.neighbours),s.k,r,a)),s.force("repulsive",r,t*a.mass,i,a,e))})})}applyLimitBox(t,e){let i,s;this.options.splitSeries&&!t.isParentNode&&this.options.parentNodeLimit&&(i=this.getDistXY(t,t.series.parentNode),(s=t.series.parentNodeRadius-t.marker.radius-this.vectorLength(i))<0&&s>-2*t.marker.radius&&(t.plotX-=.01*i.x,t.plotY-=.01*i.y)),super.applyLimitBox(t,e)}}return t.layouts.packedbubble=l,l}),i(e,"Series/SimulationSeriesUtilities.js",[e["Core/Utilities.js"],e["Core/Animation/AnimationUtilities.js"]],function(t,e){let{merge:i,syncTimeout:s}=t,{animObject:o}=e;return{initDataLabels:function(){let t=this.options.dataLabels;if(!this.dataLabelsGroup){let e=this.initDataLabelsGroup();return!this.chart.styledMode&&t?.style&&e.css(t.style),e.attr({opacity:0}),this.visible&&e.show(),e}return this.dataLabelsGroup.attr(i({opacity:1},this.getPlotBox("data-labels"))),this.dataLabelsGroup},initDataLabelsDefer:function(){let t=this.options.dataLabels;t?.defer&&this.options.layoutAlgorithm?.enableSimulation?s(()=>{this.deferDataLabels=!1},t?o(t.animation).defer:0):this.deferDataLabels=!1}}}),i(e,"Extensions/TextPath.js",[e["Core/Globals.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t,e){let{deg2rad:i}=t,{addEvent:s,merge:o,uniqueKey:a,defined:r,extend:n}=e;function l(t,e){e=o(!0,{enabled:!0,attributes:{dy:-5,startOffset:"50%",textAnchor:"middle"}},e);let i=this.renderer.url,l=this.text||this,h=l.textPath,{attributes:p,enabled:d}=e;if(t=t||h&&h.path,h&&h.undo(),t&&d){let e=s(l,"afterModifyTree",e=>{if(t&&d){let s=t.attr("id");s||t.attr("id",s=a());let o={x:0,y:0};r(p.dx)&&(o.dx=p.dx,delete p.dx),r(p.dy)&&(o.dy=p.dy,delete p.dy),l.attr(o),this.attr({transform:""}),this.box&&(this.box=this.box.destroy());let h=e.nodes.slice(0);e.nodes.length=0,e.nodes[0]={tagName:"textPath",attributes:n(p,{"text-anchor":p.textAnchor,href:`${i}#${s}`}),children:h}}});l.textPath={path:t,undo:e}}else l.attr({dx:0,dy:0}),delete l.textPath;return this.added&&(l.textCache="",this.renderer.buildText(l)),this}function h(t){let e=t.bBox,s=this.element?.querySelector("textPath");if(s){let t=[],{b:o,h:a}=this.renderer.fontMetrics(this.element),r=a-o,n=RegExp('(<tspan>|<tspan(?!\\sclass="highcharts-br")[^>]*>|<\\/tspan>)',"g"),l=s.innerHTML.replace(n,"").split(/<tspan class="highcharts-br"[^>]*>/),h=l.length,p=(t,e)=>{let{x:a,y:n}=e,l=(s.getRotationOfChar(t)-90)*i,h=Math.cos(l),p=Math.sin(l);return[[a-r*h,n-r*p],[a+o*h,n+o*p]]};for(let e=0,i=0;i<h;i++){let o=l[i].length;for(let a=0;a<o;a+=5)try{let o=e+a+i,[r,n]=p(o,s.getStartPositionOfChar(o));0===a?(t.push(n),t.push(r)):(0===i&&t.unshift(n),i===h-1&&t.push(r))}catch(t){break}e+=o-1;try{let o=e+i,a=s.getEndPositionOfChar(o),[r,n]=p(o,a);t.unshift(n),t.unshift(r)}catch(t){break}}t.length&&t.push(t[0].slice()),e.polygon=t}return e}function p(t){let e=t.labelOptions,i=t.point,s=e[i.formatPrefix+"TextPath"]||e.textPath;s&&!e.useHTML&&(this.setTextPath(i.getDataLabelPath?.(this)||i.graphic,s),i.dataLabelPath&&!s.enabled&&(i.dataLabelPath=i.dataLabelPath.destroy()))}return{compose:function(t){s(t,"afterGetBBox",h),s(t,"beforeAddingDataLabel",p);let e=t.prototype;e.setTextPath||(e.setTextPath=l)}}}),i(e,"Series/PackedBubble/PackedBubbleSeries.js",[e["Core/Color/Color.js"],e["Series/DragNodesComposition.js"],e["Series/GraphLayoutComposition.js"],e["Core/Globals.js"],e["Series/PackedBubble/PackedBubblePoint.js"],e["Series/PackedBubble/PackedBubbleSeriesDefaults.js"],e["Series/PackedBubble/PackedBubbleLayout.js"],e["Core/Series/SeriesRegistry.js"],e["Series/SimulationSeriesUtilities.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"],e["Core/Renderer/SVG/SVGElement.js"],e["Extensions/TextPath.js"]],function(t,e,i,s,o,a,r,n,l,h,p,d){let{parse:c}=t,{noop:u}=s,{series:{prototype:g},seriesTypes:{bubble:f}}=n,{initDataLabels:b,initDataLabelsDefer:m}=l,{addEvent:y,clamp:x,defined:P,extend:S,fireEvent:M,isArray:L,isNumber:C,merge:k,pick:v}=h;d.compose(p);class A extends f{constructor(){super(...arguments),this.parentNodeMass=0,this.deferDataLabels=!0}static compose(t,i,s){f.compose(t,i,s),e.compose(i),r.compose(i)}accumulateAllPoints(){let t;let e=this.chart,i=[];for(let s of e.series)if(s.is("packedbubble")&&s.reserveSpace()){t=s.yData||[];for(let e=0;e<t.length;e++)i.push([null,null,t[e],s.index,e,{id:e,marker:{radius:0}}])}return i}addLayout(){let t=this.options.layoutAlgorithm=this.options.layoutAlgorithm||{},e=t.type||"packedbubble",s=this.chart.options.chart,o=this.chart.graphLayoutsStorage,a=this.chart.graphLayoutsLookup,r;o||(this.chart.graphLayoutsStorage=o={},this.chart.graphLayoutsLookup=a=[]),(r=o[e])||(t.enableSimulation=P(s.forExport)?!s.forExport:t.enableSimulation,o[e]=r=new i.layouts[e],r.init(t),a.splice(r.index,0,r)),this.layout=r,this.points.forEach(t=>{t.mass=2,t.degree=1,t.collisionNmb=1}),r.setArea(0,0,this.chart.plotWidth,this.chart.plotHeight),r.addElementsToCollection([this],r.series),r.addElementsToCollection(this.points,r.nodes)}addSeriesLayout(){let t=this.options.layoutAlgorithm=this.options.layoutAlgorithm||{},e=t.type||"packedbubble",s=this.chart.graphLayoutsStorage,o=this.chart.graphLayoutsLookup,a=k(t,t.parentNodeOptions,{enableSimulation:this.layout.options.enableSimulation}),r=s[e+"-series"];r||(s[e+"-series"]=r=new i.layouts[e],r.init(a),o.splice(r.index,0,r)),this.parentNodeLayout=r,this.createParentNodes()}calculateParentRadius(){let t=this.seriesBox();this.parentNodeRadius=x(Math.sqrt(2*this.parentNodeMass/Math.PI)+20,20,t?Math.max(Math.sqrt(Math.pow(t.width,2)+Math.pow(t.height,2))/2+20,20):Math.sqrt(2*this.parentNodeMass/Math.PI)+20),this.parentNode&&(this.parentNode.marker.radius=this.parentNode.radius=this.parentNodeRadius)}calculateZExtremes(){let t=this.chart.series,e=this.options.zMin,i=this.options.zMax,s=1/0,o=-1/0;return e&&i?[e,i]:(t.forEach(t=>{t.yData.forEach(t=>{P(t)&&(t>o&&(o=t),t<s&&(s=t))})}),[e=v(e,s),i=v(i,o)])}checkOverlap(t,e){let i=t[0]-e[0],s=t[1]-e[1];return Math.sqrt(i*i+s*s)-Math.abs(t[2]+e[2])<-.001}createParentNodes(){let t=this.pointClass,e=this.chart,i=this.parentNodeLayout,s=this.layout.options,o,a=this.parentNode,r={radius:this.parentNodeRadius,lineColor:this.color,fillColor:c(this.color).brighten(.4).get()};s.parentNodeOptions&&(r=k(s.parentNodeOptions.marker||{},r)),this.parentNodeMass=0,this.points.forEach(t=>{this.parentNodeMass+=Math.PI*Math.pow(t.marker.radius,2)}),this.calculateParentRadius(),i.nodes.forEach(t=>{t.seriesIndex===this.index&&(o=!0)}),i.setArea(0,0,e.plotWidth,e.plotHeight),o||(a||(a=new t(this,{mass:this.parentNodeRadius/2,marker:r,dataLabels:{inside:!1},states:{normal:{marker:r},hover:{marker:r}},dataLabelOnNull:!0,degree:this.parentNodeRadius,isParentNode:!0,seriesIndex:this.index})),this.parentNode&&(a.plotX=this.parentNode.plotX,a.plotY=this.parentNode.plotY),this.parentNode=a,i.addElementsToCollection([this],i.series),i.addElementsToCollection([a],i.nodes))}deferLayout(){let t=this.options.layoutAlgorithm;this.visible&&(this.addLayout(),t.splitSeries&&this.addSeriesLayout())}destroy(){this.chart.graphLayoutsLookup&&this.chart.graphLayoutsLookup.forEach(t=>{t.removeElementFromCollection(this,t.series)},this),this.parentNode&&this.parentNodeLayout&&(this.parentNodeLayout.removeElementFromCollection(this.parentNode,this.parentNodeLayout.nodes),this.parentNode.dataLabel&&(this.parentNode.dataLabel=this.parentNode.dataLabel.destroy())),g.destroy.apply(this,arguments)}drawDataLabels(){!this.deferDataLabels&&(g.drawDataLabels.call(this,this.points),this.parentNode&&(this.parentNode.formatPrefix="parentNode",g.drawDataLabels.call(this,[this.parentNode])))}drawGraph(){if(!this.layout||!this.layout.options.splitSeries)return;let t=this.chart,e=this.layout.options.parentNodeOptions.marker,i={fill:e.fillColor||c(this.color).brighten(.4).get(),opacity:e.fillOpacity,stroke:e.lineColor||this.color,"stroke-width":v(e.lineWidth,this.options.lineWidth)},s={};this.parentNodesGroup=this.plotGroup("parentNodesGroup","parentNode",this.visible?"inherit":"hidden",.1,t.seriesGroup),this.group?.attr({zIndex:2}),this.calculateParentRadius(),this.parentNode&&P(this.parentNode.plotX)&&P(this.parentNode.plotY)&&P(this.parentNodeRadius)&&(s=k({x:this.parentNode.plotX-this.parentNodeRadius,y:this.parentNode.plotY-this.parentNodeRadius,width:2*this.parentNodeRadius,height:2*this.parentNodeRadius},i),this.parentNode.graphic||(this.graph=this.parentNode.graphic=t.renderer.symbol(i.symbol).add(this.parentNodesGroup)),this.parentNode.graphic.attr(s))}drawTracker(){let t;let e=this.parentNode;super.drawTracker(),e&&(t=L(e.dataLabels)?e.dataLabels:e.dataLabel?[e.dataLabel]:[],e.graphic&&(e.graphic.element.point=e),t.forEach(t=>{(t.div||t.element).point=e}))}getPointRadius(){let t,e,i,s;let o=this.chart,a=o.plotWidth,r=o.plotHeight,n=this.options,l=n.useSimulation,h=Math.min(a,r),p={},d=[],c=o.allDataPoints||[],u=c.length;["minSize","maxSize"].forEach(t=>{let e=parseInt(n[t],10),i=/%$/.test(n[t]);p[t]=i?h*e/100:e*Math.sqrt(u)}),o.minRadius=t=p.minSize/Math.sqrt(u),o.maxRadius=e=p.maxSize/Math.sqrt(u);let g=l?this.calculateZExtremes():[t,e];c.forEach((o,a)=>{i=l?x(o[2],g[0],g[1]):o[2],0===(s=this.getRadius(g[0],g[1],t,e,i))&&(s=null),c[a][2]=s,d.push(s)}),this.radii=d}init(){return g.init.apply(this,arguments),m.call(this),this.eventsToUnbind.push(y(this,"updatedData",function(){this.chart.series.forEach(t=>{t.type===this.type&&(t.isDirty=!0)},this)})),this}onMouseUp(t){if(t.fixedPosition&&!t.removed){let i;let s=this.layout,o=this.parentNodeLayout;o&&s.options.dragBetweenSeries&&o.nodes.forEach(e=>{t&&t.marker&&e!==t.series.parentNode&&(i=s.getDistXY(t,e),s.vectorLength(i)-e.marker.radius-t.marker.radius<0&&(e.series.addPoint(k(t.options,{plotX:t.plotX,plotY:t.plotY}),!1),s.removeElementFromCollection(t,s.nodes),t.remove()))}),e.onMouseUp.apply(this,arguments)}}placeBubbles(t){let e=this.checkOverlap,i=this.positionBubble,s=[],o=1,a=0,r=0,n,l=[],h,p=t.sort((t,e)=>e[2]-t[2]);if(p.length){if(s.push([[0,0,p[0][2],p[0][3],p[0][4]]]),p.length>1)for(s.push([[0,0-p[1][2]-p[0][2],p[1][2],p[1][3],p[1][4]]]),h=2;h<p.length;h++)p[h][2]=p[h][2]||1,e(n=i(s[o][a],s[o-1][r],p[h]),s[o][0])?(s.push([]),r=0,s[o+1].push(i(s[o][a],s[o][0],p[h])),o++,a=0):o>1&&s[o-1][r+1]&&e(n,s[o-1][r+1])?(r++,s[o].push(i(s[o][a],s[o-1][r],p[h])),a++):(a++,s[o].push(n));this.chart.stages=s,this.chart.rawPositions=[].concat.apply([],s),this.resizeRadius(),l=this.chart.rawPositions}return l}pointAttribs(t,e){let i=this.options,s=t&&t.isParentNode,o=i.marker;s&&i.layoutAlgorithm&&i.layoutAlgorithm.parentNodeOptions&&(o=i.layoutAlgorithm.parentNodeOptions.marker);let a=o.fillOpacity,r=g.pointAttribs.call(this,t,e);return 1!==a&&(r["fill-opacity"]=a),r}positionBubble(t,e,i){let s=Math.asin,o=Math.acos,a=Math.pow,r=Math.abs,n=(0,Math.sqrt)(a(t[0]-e[0],2)+a(t[1]-e[1],2)),l=o((a(n,2)+a(i[2]+e[2],2)-a(i[2]+t[2],2))/(2*(i[2]+e[2])*n)),h=s(r(t[0]-e[0])/n),p=(t[1]-e[1]<0?0:Math.PI)+l+h*((t[0]-e[0])*(t[1]-e[1])<0?1:-1),d=Math.cos(p),c=Math.sin(p);return[e[0]+(e[2]+i[2])*c,e[1]-(e[2]+i[2])*d,i[2],i[3],i[4]]}render(){let t=[];g.render.apply(this,arguments),!this.options.dataLabels.allowOverlap&&(this.data.forEach(e=>{L(e.dataLabels)&&e.dataLabels.forEach(e=>{t.push(e)})}),this.options.useSimulation&&this.chart.hideOverlappingLabels(t))}resizeRadius(){let t,e,i,s,o;let a=this.chart,r=a.rawPositions,n=Math.min,l=Math.max,h=a.plotLeft,p=a.plotTop,d=a.plotHeight,c=a.plotWidth;for(let a of(t=i=Number.POSITIVE_INFINITY,e=s=Number.NEGATIVE_INFINITY,r))o=a[2],t=n(t,a[0]-o),e=l(e,a[0]+o),i=n(i,a[1]-o),s=l(s,a[1]+o);let u=[e-t,s-i],g=[(c-h)/u[0],(d-p)/u[1]],f=n.apply([],g);if(Math.abs(f-1)>1e-10){for(let t of r)t[2]*=f;this.placeBubbles(r)}else a.diffY=d/2+p-i-(s-i)/2,a.diffX=c/2+h-t-(e-t)/2}seriesBox(){let t;let e=this.chart,i=this.data,s=Math.max,o=Math.min,a=[e.plotLeft,e.plotLeft+e.plotWidth,e.plotTop,e.plotTop+e.plotHeight];return i.forEach(e=>{P(e.plotX)&&P(e.plotY)&&e.marker.radius&&(t=e.marker.radius,a[0]=o(a[0],e.plotX-t),a[1]=s(a[1],e.plotX+t),a[2]=o(a[2],e.plotY-t),a[3]=s(a[3],e.plotY+t))}),C(a.width/a.height)?a:null}setVisible(){let t=this;g.setVisible.apply(t,arguments),t.parentNodeLayout&&t.graph?t.visible?(t.graph.show(),t.parentNode.dataLabel&&t.parentNode.dataLabel.show()):(t.graph.hide(),t.parentNodeLayout.removeElementFromCollection(t.parentNode,t.parentNodeLayout.nodes),t.parentNode.dataLabel&&t.parentNode.dataLabel.hide()):t.layout&&(t.visible?t.layout.addElementsToCollection(t.points,t.layout.nodes):t.points.forEach(e=>{t.layout.removeElementFromCollection(e,t.layout.nodes)}))}translate(){let t,e,i;let s=this.chart,o=this.data,a=this.index,r=this.options.useSimulation;for(let n of(this.processedXData=this.xData,this.generatePoints(),P(s.allDataPoints)||(s.allDataPoints=this.accumulateAllPoints(),this.getPointRadius()),r?i=s.allDataPoints:(i=this.placeBubbles(s.allDataPoints),this.options.draggable=!1),i))n[3]===a&&(t=o[n[4]],e=v(n[2],void 0),r||(t.plotX=n[0]-s.plotLeft+s.diffX,t.plotY=n[1]-s.plotTop+s.diffY),C(e)&&(t.marker=S(t.marker,{radius:e,width:2*e,height:2*e}),t.radius=e));r&&this.deferLayout(),M(this,"afterTranslate")}}return A.defaultOptions=k(f.defaultOptions,a),S(A.prototype,{pointClass:o,axisTypes:[],directTouch:!0,forces:["barycenter","repulsive"],hasDraggableNodes:!0,invertible:!1,isCartesian:!1,noSharedTooltip:!0,pointArrayMap:["value"],pointValKey:"value",requireSorting:!1,trackerGroups:["group","dataLabelsGroup","parentNodesGroup"],initDataLabels:b,alignDataLabel:g.alignDataLabel,indexateNodes:u,onMouseDown:e.onMouseDown,onMouseMove:e.onMouseMove,redrawHalo:e.redrawHalo,searchPoint:u}),n.registerSeriesType("packedbubble",A),A}),i(e,"Series/Polygon/PolygonSeriesDefaults.js",[],function(){return{marker:{enabled:!1,states:{hover:{enabled:!1}}},stickyTracking:!1,tooltip:{followPointer:!0,pointFormat:""},trackByArea:!0,legendSymbol:"rectangle"}}),i(e,"Series/Polygon/PolygonSeries.js",[e["Core/Globals.js"],e["Series/Polygon/PolygonSeriesDefaults.js"],e["Core/Series/SeriesRegistry.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t,e,i,s){let{noop:o}=t,{area:a,line:r,scatter:n}=i.seriesTypes,{extend:l,merge:h}=s;class p extends n{getGraphPath(){let t=r.prototype.getGraphPath.call(this),e=t.length+1;for(;e--;)(e===t.length||"M"===t[e][0])&&e>0&&t.splice(e,0,["Z"]);return this.areaPath=t,t}drawGraph(){this.options.fillColor=this.color,a.prototype.drawGraph.call(this)}}return p.defaultOptions=h(n.defaultOptions,e),l(p.prototype,{type:"polygon",drawTracker:r.prototype.drawTracker,setStackedPoints:o}),i.registerSeriesType("polygon",p),p}),i(e,"Core/Axis/RadialAxisDefaults.js",[],function(){return{circular:{gridLineWidth:1,labels:{align:void 0,x:0,y:void 0,style:{textOverflow:"none"}},maxPadding:0,minPadding:0,showLastLabel:!1,tickLength:0},radial:{gridLineInterpolation:"circle",gridLineWidth:1,labels:{align:"right",padding:5,x:-3,y:-2},showLastLabel:!1,title:{x:4,text:null,rotation:90}},radialGauge:{endOnTick:!1,gridLineWidth:0,labels:{align:"center",distance:-25,x:0,y:void 0},lineWidth:1,minorGridLineWidth:0,minorTickInterval:"auto",minorTickLength:10,minorTickPosition:"inside",minorTickWidth:1,startOnTick:!1,tickLength:10,tickPixelInterval:100,tickPosition:"inside",tickWidth:2,title:{rotation:0,text:""},zIndex:2}}}),i(e,"Core/Axis/RadialAxis.js",[e["Core/Axis/RadialAxisDefaults.js"],e["Core/Defaults.js"],e["Core/Globals.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t,e,i,s){var o;let{defaultOptions:a}=e,{composed:r,noop:n}=i,{addEvent:l,correctFloat:h,defined:p,extend:d,fireEvent:c,isObject:u,merge:g,pick:f,pushUnique:b,relativeLength:m,wrap:y}=s;return function(e){function s(){this.autoConnect=this.isCircular&&void 0===f(this.userMax,this.options.max)&&h(this.endAngleRad-this.startAngleRad)===h(2*Math.PI),!this.isCircular&&this.chart.inverted&&this.max++,this.autoConnect&&(this.max+=this.categories&&1||this.pointRange||this.closestPointRange||0)}function o(){return()=>{if(this.isRadial&&this.tickPositions&&this.options.labels&&!0!==this.options.labels.allowOverlap)return this.tickPositions.map(t=>this.ticks[t]&&this.ticks[t].label).filter(t=>!!t)}}function x(){return n}function P(t,e,i){let s=this.pane.center,o=t.value,a,r,n;return this.isCircular?(p(o)?t.point&&(t.point.shapeArgs||{}).start&&(o=this.chart.inverted?this.translate(t.point.rectPlotY,!0):t.point.x):(r=t.chartX||0,n=t.chartY||0,o=this.translate(Math.atan2(n-i,r-e)-this.startAngleRad,!0)),r=(a=this.getPosition(o)).x,n=a.y):(p(o)||(r=t.chartX,n=t.chartY),p(r)&&p(n)&&(i=s[1]+this.chart.plotTop,o=this.translate(Math.min(Math.sqrt(Math.pow(r-e,2)+Math.pow(n-i,2)),s[2]/2)-s[3]/2,!0))),[o,r||0,n||0]}function S(t,e,i){let s=this.pane.center,o=this.chart,a=this.left||0,r=this.top||0,n,l=f(e,s[2]/2-this.offset),h;return void 0===i&&(i=this.horiz?0:this.center&&-this.center[3]/2),i&&(l+=i),this.isCircular||void 0!==e?((h=this.chart.renderer.symbols.arc(a+s[0],r+s[1],l,l,{start:this.startAngleRad,end:this.endAngleRad,open:!0,innerR:0})).xBounds=[a+s[0]],h.yBounds=[r+s[1]-l]):(n=this.postTranslate(this.angleRad,l),h=[["M",this.center[0]+o.plotLeft,this.center[1]+o.plotTop],["L",n.x,n.y]]),h}function M(){this.constructor.prototype.getOffset.call(this),this.chart.axisOffset[this.side]=0}function L(t,e,i){let s=this.chart,o=t=>{if("string"==typeof t){let e=parseInt(t,10);return d.test(t)&&(e=e*n/100),e}return t},a=this.center,r=this.startAngleRad,n=a[2]/2,l=Math.min(this.offset,0),h=this.left||0,p=this.top||0,d=/%$/,c=this.isCircular,u,g,b,m,y,x,P=f(o(i.outerRadius),n),S=o(i.innerRadius),M=f(o(i.thickness),10);if("polygon"===this.options.gridLineInterpolation)x=this.getPlotLinePath({value:t}).concat(this.getPlotLinePath({value:e,reverse:!0}));else{t=Math.max(t,this.min),e=Math.min(e,this.max);let o=this.translate(t),n=this.translate(e);c||(P=o||0,S=n||0),"circle"!==i.shape&&c?(u=r+(o||0),g=r+(n||0)):(u=-Math.PI/2,g=1.5*Math.PI,y=!0),P-=l,M-=l,x=s.renderer.symbols.arc(h+a[0],p+a[1],P,P,{start:Math.min(u,g),end:Math.max(u,g),innerR:f(S,P-M),open:y,borderRadius:i.borderRadius}),c&&(b=(g+u)/2,m=h+a[0]+a[2]/2*Math.cos(b),x.xBounds=b>-Math.PI/2&&b<Math.PI/2?[m,s.plotWidth]:[0,m],x.yBounds=[p+a[1]+a[2]/2*Math.sin(b)],x.yBounds[0]+=b>-Math.PI&&b<0||b>Math.PI?-10:10)}return x}function C(t){let e=this.pane.center,i=this.chart,s=i.inverted,o=t.reverse,a=this.pane.options.background?this.pane.options.background[0]||this.pane.options.background:{},r=a.innerRadius||"0%",n=a.outerRadius||"100%",l=e[0]+i.plotLeft,h=e[1]+i.plotTop,p=this.height,d=t.isCrosshair,c=e[3]/2,u=t.value,g,f,b,y,x,P,S,M,L,C=this.getPosition(u),k=C.x,v=C.y;if(d&&(u=(M=this.getCrosshairPosition(t,l,h))[0],k=M[1],v=M[2]),this.isCircular)f=Math.sqrt(Math.pow(k-l,2)+Math.pow(v-h,2)),b="string"==typeof r?m(r,1):r/f,y="string"==typeof n?m(n,1):n/f,e&&c&&(b<(g=c/f)&&(b=g),y<g&&(y=g)),L=[["M",l+b*(k-l),h-b*(h-v)],["L",k-(1-y)*(k-l),v+(1-y)*(h-v)]];else if((u=this.translate(u))&&(u<0||u>p)&&(u=0),"circle"===this.options.gridLineInterpolation)L=this.getLinePath(0,u,c);else if(L=[],i[s?"yAxis":"xAxis"].forEach(t=>{t.pane===this.pane&&(x=t)}),x){S=x.tickPositions,x.autoConnect&&(S=S.concat([S[0]])),o&&(S=S.slice().reverse()),u&&(u+=c);for(let t=0;t<S.length;t++)P=x.getPosition(S[t],u),L.push(t?["L",P.x,P.y]:["M",P.x,P.y])}return L}function k(t,e){let i=this.translate(t);return this.postTranslate(this.isCircular?i:this.angleRad,f(this.isCircular?e:i<0?0:i,this.center[2]/2)-this.offset)}function v(){let t=this.center,e=this.chart,i=this.options.title;return{x:e.plotLeft+t[0]+(i.x||0),y:e.plotTop+t[1]-({high:.5,middle:.25,low:0})[i.align]*t[2]+(i.y||0)}}function A(t){t.beforeSetTickPositions=s,t.createLabelCollector=o,t.getCrosshairPosition=P,t.getLinePath=S,t.getOffset=M,t.getPlotBandPath=L,t.getPlotLinePath=C,t.getPosition=k,t.getTitlePosition=v,t.postTranslate=D,t.setAxisSize=B,t.setAxisTranslation=z,t.setOptions=O}function w(){let t=this.chart,e=this.options,i=t.angular&&this.isXAxis,s=this.pane,o=s&&s.options;if(!i&&s&&(t.angular||t.polar)){let t=2*Math.PI,i=(f(o.startAngle,0)-90)*Math.PI/180,s=(f(o.endAngle,f(o.startAngle,0)+360)-90)*Math.PI/180;this.angleRad=(e.angle||0)*Math.PI/180,this.startAngleRad=i,this.endAngleRad=s,this.offset=e.offset||0;let a=(i%t+t)%t,r=(s%t+t)%t;a>Math.PI&&(a-=t),r>Math.PI&&(r-=t),this.normalizedStartAngleRad=a,this.normalizedEndAngleRad=r}}function T(t){this.isRadial&&(t.align=void 0,t.preventDefault())}function N(){if(this.chart&&this.chart.labelCollectors){let t=this.labelCollector?this.chart.labelCollectors.indexOf(this.labelCollector):-1;t>=0&&this.chart.labelCollectors.splice(t,1)}}function X(t){let e;let i=this.chart,s=i.angular,o=i.polar,a=this.isXAxis,r=this.coll,l=t.userOptions.pane||0,h=this.pane=i.pane&&i.pane[l];if("colorAxis"===r){this.isRadial=!1;return}s?(s&&a?(this.isHidden=!0,this.createLabelCollector=x,this.getOffset=n,this.redraw=E,this.render=E,this.setScale=n,this.setCategories=n,this.setTitle=n):A(this),e=!a):o&&(A(this),e=this.horiz),s||o?(this.isRadial=!0,this.labelCollector||(this.labelCollector=this.createLabelCollector()),this.labelCollector&&i.labelCollectors.push(this.labelCollector)):this.isRadial=!1,h&&e&&(h.axis=this),this.isCircular=e}function R(){this.isRadial&&this.beforeSetTickPositions()}function Y(t){let e=this.label;if(!e)return;let i=this.axis,s=e.getBBox(),o=i.options.labels,a=(i.translate(this.pos)+i.startAngleRad+Math.PI/2)/Math.PI*180%360,r=Math.round(a),n=p(o.y)?0:-(.3*s.height),l=o.y,h,d=20,c=o.align,u="end",g=r<0?r+360:r,b=g,y=0,x=0;i.isRadial&&(h=i.getPosition(this.pos,i.center[2]/2+m(f(o.distance,-25),i.center[2]/2,-i.center[2]/2)),"auto"===o.rotation?e.attr({rotation:a}):p(l)||(l=i.chart.renderer.fontMetrics(e).b-s.height/2),p(c)||(i.isCircular?(s.width>i.len*i.tickInterval/(i.max-i.min)&&(d=0),c=a>d&&a<180-d?"left":a>180+d&&a<360-d?"right":"center"):c="center",e.attr({align:c})),"auto"===c&&2===i.tickPositions.length&&i.isCircular&&(g>90&&g<180?g=180-g:g>270&&g<=360&&(g=540-g),b>180&&b<=360&&(b=360-b),(i.pane.options.startAngle===r||i.pane.options.startAngle===r+360||i.pane.options.startAngle===r-360)&&(u="start"),c=r>=-90&&r<=90||r>=-360&&r<=-270||r>=270&&r<=360?"start"===u?"right":"left":"start"===u?"left":"right",b>70&&b<110&&(c="center"),g<15||g>=180&&g<195?y=.3*s.height:g>=15&&g<=35?y="start"===u?0:.75*s.height:g>=195&&g<=215?y="start"===u?.75*s.height:0:g>35&&g<=90?y="start"===u?-(.25*s.height):s.height:g>215&&g<=270&&(y="start"===u?s.height:-(.25*s.height)),b<15?x="start"===u?-(.15*s.height):.15*s.height:b>165&&b<=180&&(x="start"===u?.15*s.height:-(.15*s.height)),e.attr({align:c}),e.translate(x,y+n)),t.pos.x=h.x+(o.x||0),t.pos.y=h.y+(l||0))}function j(t){this.axis.getPosition&&d(t.pos,this.axis.getPosition(this.pos))}function I({options:t}){t.xAxis&&g(!0,e.radialDefaultOptions.circular,t.xAxis),t.yAxis&&g(!0,e.radialDefaultOptions.radialGauge,t.yAxis)}function D(t,e){let i=this.chart,s=this.center;return t=this.startAngleRad+t,{x:i.plotLeft+s[0]+Math.cos(t)*e,y:i.plotTop+s[1]+Math.sin(t)*e}}function E(){this.isDirty=!1}function B(){let t,e;this.constructor.prototype.setAxisSize.call(this),this.isRadial&&(this.pane.updateCenter(this),t=this.center=this.pane.center.slice(),this.isCircular?this.sector=this.endAngleRad-this.startAngleRad:(e=this.postTranslate(this.angleRad,t[3]/2),t[0]=e.x-this.chart.plotLeft,t[1]=e.y-this.chart.plotTop),this.len=this.width=this.height=(t[2]-t[3])*f(this.sector,1)/2)}function z(){this.constructor.prototype.setAxisTranslation.call(this),this.center&&(this.isCircular?this.transA=(this.endAngleRad-this.startAngleRad)/(this.max-this.min||1):this.transA=(this.center[2]-this.center[3])/2/(this.max-this.min||1),this.isXAxis?this.minPixelPadding=this.transA*this.minPointOffset:this.minPixelPadding=0)}function O(t){let{coll:i}=this,{angular:s,inverted:o,polar:r}=this.chart,n={};s?this.isXAxis||(n=g(a.yAxis,e.radialDefaultOptions.radialGauge)):r&&(n=this.horiz?g(a.xAxis,e.radialDefaultOptions.circular):g("xAxis"===i?a.xAxis:a.yAxis,e.radialDefaultOptions.radial)),o&&"yAxis"===i&&(n.stackLabels=u(a.yAxis,!0)?a.yAxis.stackLabels:{},n.reversedStacks=!0);let l=this.options=g(n,t);l.plotBands||(l.plotBands=[]),c(this,"afterSetOptions")}function W(t,e,i,s,o,a,r){let n;let l=this.axis;return l.isRadial?["M",e,i,"L",(n=l.getPosition(this.pos,l.center[2]/2+s)).x,n.y]:t.call(this,e,i,s,o,a,r)}e.radialDefaultOptions=g(t),e.compose=function(t,e){return b(r,"Axis.Radial")&&(l(t,"afterInit",w),l(t,"autoLabelAlign",T),l(t,"destroy",N),l(t,"init",X),l(t,"initialAxisTranslation",R),l(e,"afterGetLabelPosition",Y),l(e,"afterGetPosition",j),l(i,"setOptions",I),y(e.prototype,"getMarkPath",W)),t}}(o||(o={})),o}),i(e,"Series/PolarComposition.js",[e["Core/Animation/AnimationUtilities.js"],e["Core/Globals.js"],e["Core/Series/Series.js"],e["Extensions/Pane/Pane.js"],e["Core/Axis/RadialAxis.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t,e,i,s,o,a){let{animObject:r}=t,{composed:n}=e,{addEvent:l,defined:h,find:p,isNumber:d,merge:c,pick:u,pushUnique:g,relativeLength:f,splat:b,uniqueKey:m,wrap:y}=a;function x(){(this.pane||[]).forEach(t=>{t.render()})}function P(t){let e=t.args[0].xAxis,i=t.args[0].yAxis,s=t.args[0].chart;e&&i&&("polygon"===i.gridLineInterpolation?(e.startOnTick=!0,e.endOnTick=!0):"polygon"===e.gridLineInterpolation&&s.inverted&&(i.startOnTick=!0,i.endOnTick=!0))}function S(){this.pane||(this.pane=[]),this.options.pane=b(this.options.pane),this.options.pane.forEach(t=>{new s(t,this)},this)}function M(t){let e=t.args.marker,i=this.chart.xAxis[0],s=this.chart.yAxis[0],o=this.chart.inverted,a=o?s:i,r=o?i:s;if(this.chart.polar){t.preventDefault();let i=(e.attr?e.attr("start"):e.start)-a.startAngleRad,s=e.attr?e.attr("r"):e.r,o=(e.attr?e.attr("end"):e.end)-a.startAngleRad,n=e.attr?e.attr("innerR"):e.innerR;t.result.x=i+a.pos,t.result.width=o-i,t.result.y=r.len+r.pos-s,t.result.height=s-n}}function L(t){let e=this.chart;if(e.polar&&e.hoverPane&&e.hoverPane.axis){t.preventDefault();let i=e.hoverPane.center,s=e.mouseDownX||0,o=e.mouseDownY||0,a=t.args.chartY,r=t.args.chartX,n=2*Math.PI,l=e.hoverPane.axis.startAngleRad,h=e.hoverPane.axis.endAngleRad,p=e.inverted?e.xAxis[0]:e.yAxis[0],d={},c="arc";if(d.x=i[0]+e.plotLeft,d.y=i[1]+e.plotTop,this.zoomHor){let t=l>0?h-l:Math.abs(l)+Math.abs(h),u=Math.atan2(o-e.plotTop-i[1],s-e.plotLeft-i[0])-l,g=Math.atan2(a-e.plotTop-i[1],r-e.plotLeft-i[0])-l;d.r=i[2]/2,d.innerR=i[3]/2,u<=0&&(u+=n),g<=0&&(g+=n),g<u&&(g=[u,u=g][0]),t<n&&l+g>h+(n-t)/2&&(g=u,u=l<=0?l:0);let f=d.start=Math.max(u+l,l),b=d.end=Math.min(g+l,h);if("polygon"===p.options.gridLineInterpolation){let t=e.hoverPane.axis,s=f-t.startAngleRad+t.pos,o=p.getPlotLinePath({value:p.max}),a=t.toValue(s),r=t.toValue(s+(b-f));if(a<t.getExtremes().min){let{min:e,max:i}=t.getExtremes();a=i-(e-a)}if(r<t.getExtremes().min){let{min:e,max:i}=t.getExtremes();r=i-(e-r)}r<a&&(r=[a,a=r][0]),(o=A(o,a,r,t)).push(["L",i[0]+e.plotLeft,e.plotTop+i[1]]),d.d=o,c="path"}}if(this.zoomVert){let t=e.inverted?e.xAxis[0]:e.yAxis[0],n=Math.sqrt(Math.pow(s-e.plotLeft-i[0],2)+Math.pow(o-e.plotTop-i[1],2)),p=Math.sqrt(Math.pow(r-e.plotLeft-i[0],2)+Math.pow(a-e.plotTop-i[1],2));if(p<n&&(n=[p,p=n][0]),p>i[2]/2&&(p=i[2]/2),n<i[3]/2&&(n=i[3]/2),this.zoomHor||(d.start=l,d.end=h),d.r=p,d.innerR=n,"polygon"===t.options.gridLineInterpolation){let e=t.toValue(t.len+t.pos-n),i=t.toValue(t.len+t.pos-p),s=t.getPlotLinePath({value:i}).concat(t.getPlotLinePath({value:e,reverse:!0}));d.d=s,c="path"}}if(this.zoomHor&&this.zoomVert&&"polygon"===p.options.gridLineInterpolation){let t=e.hoverPane.axis,i=d.start||0,s=d.end||0,o=i-t.startAngleRad+t.pos,a=t.toValue(o),r=t.toValue(o+(s-i));if(d.d instanceof Array){let t=d.d.slice(0,d.d.length/2),i=d.d.slice(d.d.length/2,d.d.length);i=[...i].reverse();let s=e.hoverPane.axis;t=A(t,a,r,s),(i=A(i,a,r,s))&&(i[0][0]="L"),i=[...i].reverse(),d.d=t.concat(i),c="path"}}t.attrs=d,t.shapeType=c}}function C(){let t=this.chart;t.polar&&(this.polar=new E(this),t.inverted&&(this.isRadialSeries=!0,this.is("column")&&(this.isRadialBar=!0)))}function k(){if(this.chart.polar&&this.xAxis){let{xAxis:t,yAxis:i}=this,s=this.chart;this.kdByAngle=s.tooltip&&s.tooltip.shared,this.kdByAngle||s.inverted?this.searchPoint=v:this.options.findNearestPointBy="xy";let o=this.points,a=o.length;for(;a--;)this.is("column")||this.is("columnrange")||this.polar.toXY(o[a]),s.hasParallelCoordinates||this.yAxis.reversed||(u(o[a].y,Number.MIN_VALUE)<i.min||o[a].x<t.min||o[a].x>t.max?(o[a].isNull=!0,o[a].plotY=NaN):o[a].isNull=o[a].isValid&&!o[a].isValid());this.hasClipCircleSetter||(this.hasClipCircleSetter=!!this.eventsToUnbind.push(l(this,"afterRender",function(){let t;s.polar&&!1!==this.options.clip&&(t=this.yAxis.pane.center,this.clipCircle?this.clipCircle.animate({x:t[0],y:t[1],r:t[2]/2,innerR:t[3]/2}):this.clipCircle=function(t,e,i,s,o){let a=m(),r=t.createElement("clipPath").attr({id:a}).add(t.defs),n=o?t.arc(e,i,s,o,0,2*Math.PI).add(r):t.circle(e,i,s).add(r);return n.id=a,n.clipPath=r,n}(s.renderer,t[0],t[1],t[2]/2,t[3]/2),this.group.clip(this.clipCircle),this.setClip=e.noop)})))}}function v(t){let e=this.chart,i=this.xAxis,s=this.yAxis,o=i.pane&&i.pane.center,a=t.chartX-(o&&o[0]||0)-e.plotLeft,r=t.chartY-(o&&o[1]||0)-e.plotTop,n=e.inverted?{clientX:t.chartX-s.pos,plotY:t.chartY-i.pos}:{clientX:180+-180/Math.PI*Math.atan2(a,r)};return this.searchKDTree(n)}function A(t,e,i,s){let o=s.tickInterval,a=s.tickPositions,r=p(a,t=>t>=i),n=p([...a].reverse(),t=>t<=e);return h(r)||(r=a[a.length-1]),h(n)||(n=a[0],r+=o,t[0][0]="L",t.unshift(t[t.length-3])),(t=t.slice(a.indexOf(n),a.indexOf(r)+1))[0][0]="M",t}function w(t,e){return p(this.pane||[],t=>t.options.id===e)||t.call(this,e)}function T(t,e,s,o,a,r){let n,l,h;let p=this.chart,d=u(o.inside,!!this.options.stacking);if(p.polar){if(n=e.rectPlotX/Math.PI*180,p.inverted)this.forceDL=p.isInsidePlot(e.plotX,e.plotY),d&&e.shapeArgs?(l=e.shapeArgs,a=c(a,{x:(h=this.yAxis.postTranslate(((l.start||0)+(l.end||0))/2-this.xAxis.startAngleRad,e.barX+e.pointWidth/2)).x-p.plotLeft,y:h.y-p.plotTop})):e.tooltipPos&&(a=c(a,{x:e.tooltipPos[0],y:e.tooltipPos[1]})),o.align=u(o.align,"center"),o.verticalAlign=u(o.verticalAlign,"middle");else{var g;let t,e;null===(g=o).align&&(t=n>20&&n<160?"left":n>200&&n<340?"right":"center",g.align=t),null===g.verticalAlign&&(e=n<45||n>315?"bottom":n>135&&n<225?"top":"middle",g.verticalAlign=e),o=g}i.prototype.alignDataLabel.call(this,e,s,o,a,r),this.isRadialBar&&e.shapeArgs&&e.shapeArgs.start===e.shapeArgs.end?s.hide():s.show()}else t.call(this,e,s,o,a,r)}function N(){let t=this.options,e=t.stacking,i=this.chart,s=this.xAxis,o=this.yAxis,r=o.reversed,n=o.center,l=s.startAngleRad,p=s.endAngleRad-l,c=t.threshold,u=0,g,b,m,y,x,P=0,S=0,M,L,C,k,v,A,w,T;if(s.isRadial)for(m=(g=this.points).length,y=o.translate(o.min),x=o.translate(o.max),c=t.threshold||0,i.inverted&&d(c)&&h(u=o.translate(c))&&(u<0?u=0:u>p&&(u=p),this.translatedThreshold=u+l);m--;){if(A=(b=g[m]).barX,L=b.x,C=b.y,b.shapeType="arc",i.inverted){b.plotY=o.translate(C),e&&o.stacking?(v=o.stacking.stacks[(C<0?"-":"")+this.stackKey],this.visible&&v&&v[L]&&!b.isNull&&(k=v[L].points[this.getStackIndicator(void 0,L,this.index).key],P=o.translate(k[0]),S=o.translate(k[1]),h(P)&&(P=a.clamp(P,0,p)))):(P=u,S=b.plotY),P>S&&(S=[P,P=S][0]),r?S>y?S=y:P<x?P=x:(P>y||S<x)&&(P=S=p):P<y?P=y:S>x?S=x:(S<y||P>x)&&(P=S=0),o.min>o.max&&(P=S=r?p:0),P+=l,S+=l,n&&(b.barX=A+=n[3]/2),w=Math.max(A,0),T=Math.max(A+b.pointWidth,0);let i=t.borderRadius,s=f(("object"==typeof i?i.radius:i)||0,T-w);b.shapeArgs={x:n[0],y:n[1],r:T,innerR:w,start:P,end:S,borderRadius:s},b.opacity=P===S?0:void 0,b.plotY=(h(this.translatedThreshold)&&(P<this.translatedThreshold?P:S))-l}else P=A+l,b.shapeArgs=this.polar.arc(b.yBottom,b.plotY,P,P+b.pointWidth),b.shapeArgs.borderRadius=0;this.polar.toXY(b),i.inverted?(M=o.postTranslate(b.rectPlotY,A+b.pointWidth/2),b.tooltipPos=[M.x-i.plotLeft,M.y-i.plotTop]):b.tooltipPos=[b.plotX,b.plotY],n&&(b.ttBelow=b.plotY>n[1])}}function X(t,e){let i,s;let o=this;if(this.chart.polar){e=e||this.points;for(let t=0;t<e.length;t++)if(!e[t].isNull){i=t;break}!1!==this.options.connectEnds&&void 0!==i&&(this.connectEnds=!0,e.splice(e.length,0,e[i]),s=!0),e.forEach(t=>{void 0===t.polarPlotY&&o.polar.toXY(t)})}let a=t.apply(this,[].slice.call(arguments,1));return s&&e.pop(),a}function R(t,e){let i=this.chart,s={xAxis:[],yAxis:[]};return i.polar?i.axes.forEach(t=>{if("colorAxis"===t.coll)return;let o=t.isXAxis,a=t.center,r=e.chartX-a[0]-i.plotLeft,n=e.chartY-a[1]-i.plotTop;s[o?"xAxis":"yAxis"].push({axis:t,value:t.translate(o?Math.PI-Math.atan2(r,n):Math.sqrt(Math.pow(r,2)+Math.pow(n,2)),!0)})}):s=t.call(this,e),s}function Y(t,e){this.chart.polar||t.call(this,e)}function j(t,i){let s=this,o=this.chart,a=this.group,n=this.markerGroup,l=this.xAxis&&this.xAxis.center,h=o.plotLeft,p=o.plotTop,d=this.options.animation,c,g,f,b,m,y;o.polar?s.isRadialBar?i||(s.startAngleRad=u(s.translatedThreshold,s.xAxis.startAngleRad),e.seriesTypes.pie.prototype.animate.call(s,i)):(d=r(d),s.is("column")?i||(g=l[3]/2,s.points.forEach(t=>{f=t.graphic,m=(b=t.shapeArgs)&&b.r,y=b&&b.innerR,f&&b&&(f.attr({r:g,innerR:g}),f.animate({r:m,innerR:y},s.options.animation))})):i?(c={translateX:l[0]+h,translateY:l[1]+p,scaleX:.001,scaleY:.001},a.attr(c),n&&n.attr(c)):(c={translateX:h,translateY:p,scaleX:1,scaleY:1},a.animate(c,d),n&&n.animate(c,d))):t.call(this,i)}function I(t,e,i,s){let o,a;if(this.chart.polar){if(s){let t=(a=function t(e,i,s,o){let a,r,n,l,h,p;let d=o?1:0,c=(a=i>=0&&i<=e.length-1?i:i<0?e.length-1+i:0)-1<0?e.length-(1+d):a-1,u=a+1>e.length-1?d:a+1,g=e[c],f=e[u],b=g.plotX,m=g.plotY,y=f.plotX,x=f.plotY,P=e[a].plotX,S=e[a].plotY;r=(1.5*P+b)/2.5,n=(1.5*S+m)/2.5,l=(1.5*P+y)/2.5,h=(1.5*S+x)/2.5;let M=Math.sqrt(Math.pow(r-P,2)+Math.pow(n-S,2)),L=Math.sqrt(Math.pow(l-P,2)+Math.pow(h-S,2)),C=Math.atan2(n-S,r-P);p=Math.PI/2+(C+Math.atan2(h-S,l-P))/2,Math.abs(C-p)>Math.PI/2&&(p-=Math.PI),r=P+Math.cos(p)*M,n=S+Math.sin(p)*M;let k={rightContX:l=P+Math.cos(Math.PI+p)*L,rightContY:h=S+Math.sin(Math.PI+p)*L,leftContX:r,leftContY:n,plotX:P,plotY:S};return s&&(k.prevPointCont=t(e,c,!1,o)),k}(e,s,!0,this.connectEnds)).prevPointCont&&a.prevPointCont.rightContX,i=a.prevPointCont&&a.prevPointCont.rightContY;o=["C",d(t)?t:a.plotX,d(i)?i:a.plotY,d(a.leftContX)?a.leftContX:a.plotX,d(a.leftContY)?a.leftContY:a.plotY,a.plotX,a.plotY]}else o=["M",i.plotX,i.plotY]}else o=t.call(this,e,i,s);return o}function D(t,e,i=this.plotY){if(!this.destroyed){let{plotX:s,series:o}=this,{chart:a}=o;return a.polar&&d(s)&&d(i)?[s+(e?a.plotLeft:0),i+(e?a.plotTop:0)]:t.call(this,e,i)}}class E{static compose(t,e,i,a,r,h,p,d,c,u){if(s.compose(e,i),o.compose(t,r),g(n,"Polar")){let t=e.prototype,s=h.prototype,o=i.prototype,r=a.prototype;if(l(e,"afterDrawChartBox",x),l(e,"getAxes",S),l(e,"init",P),y(t,"get",w),y(o,"getCoordinates",R),y(o,"pinch",Y),l(i,"getSelectionMarkerAttrs",L),l(i,"getSelectionBox",M),l(a,"afterInit",C),l(a,"afterTranslate",k,{order:2}),l(a,"afterColumnTranslate",N,{order:4}),y(r,"animate",j),y(s,"pos",D),d){let t=d.prototype;y(t,"alignDataLabel",T),y(t,"animate",j)}if(c&&y(c.prototype,"getGraphPath",X),u){let t=u.prototype;y(t,"getPointSpline",I),p&&(p.prototype.getPointSpline=t.getPointSpline)}}}constructor(t){this.series=t}arc(t,e,i,s){let o=this.series,a=o.xAxis.center,r=o.yAxis.len,n=a[3]/2,l=r-e+n,h=r-u(t,r)+n;return o.yAxis.reversed&&(l<0&&(l=n),h<0&&(h=n)),{x:a[0],y:a[1],r:l,innerR:h,start:i,end:s}}toXY(t){let e=this.series,i=e.chart,s=e.xAxis,o=e.yAxis,a=t.plotX,r=i.inverted,n=t.y,l=t.plotY,h=r?a:o.len-l,p;if(r&&e&&!e.isRadialBar&&(t.plotY=l=d(n)?o.translate(n):0),t.rectPlotX=a,t.rectPlotY=l,o.center&&(h+=o.center[3]/2),d(l)){let e=r?o.postTranslate(l,h):s.postTranslate(a,h);t.plotX=t.polarPlotX=e.x-i.plotLeft,t.plotY=t.polarPlotY=e.y-i.plotTop}e.kdByAngle?((p=(a/Math.PI*180+s.pane.options.startAngle)%360)<0&&(p+=360),t.clientX=p):t.clientX=t.plotX}}return E}),i(e,"Core/Axis/WaterfallAxis.js",[e["Core/Globals.js"],e["Core/Axis/Stacking/StackItem.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t,e,i){var s;let{composed:o}=t,{addEvent:a,objectEach:r,pushUnique:n}=i;return function(t){function i(){let t=this.waterfall.stacks;t&&(t.changed=!1,delete t.alreadyChanged)}function s(){let t=this.options.stackLabels;t&&t.enabled&&this.waterfall.stacks&&this.waterfall.renderStackTotals()}function l(){this.waterfall||(this.waterfall=new p(this))}function h(){let t=this.axes;for(let e of this.series)if(e.options.stacking){for(let e of t)e.isXAxis||(e.waterfall.stacks.changed=!0);break}}t.compose=function(t,e){n(o,"Axis.Waterfall")&&(a(t,"init",l),a(t,"afterBuildStacks",i),a(t,"afterRender",s),a(e,"beforeRedraw",h))};class p{constructor(t){this.axis=t,this.stacks={changed:!1}}renderStackTotals(){let t=this.axis,i=t.waterfall.stacks,s=t.stacking&&t.stacking.stackTotalGroup,o=new e(t,t.options.stackLabels||{},!1,0,void 0);this.dummyStackItem=o,s&&r(i,t=>{r(t,(t,i)=>{o.total=t.stackTotal,o.x=+i,t.label&&(o.label=t.label),e.prototype.render.call(o,s),t.label=o.label,delete o.label})}),o.total=null}}t.Composition=p}(s||(s={})),s}),i(e,"Series/Waterfall/WaterfallPoint.js",[e["Series/Column/ColumnSeries.js"],e["Core/Series/Point.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"]],function(t,e,i){let{isNumber:s}=i;class o extends t.prototype.pointClass{getClassName(){let t=e.prototype.getClassName.call(this);return this.isSum?t+=" highcharts-sum":this.isIntermediateSum&&(t+=" highcharts-intermediate-sum"),t}isValid(){return s(this.y)||this.isSum||!!this.isIntermediateSum}}return o}),i(e,"Series/Waterfall/WaterfallSeriesDefaults.js",[],function(){return{dataLabels:{inside:!0},lineWidth:1,lineColor:"#333333",dashStyle:"Dot",borderColor:"#333333",states:{hover:{lineWidthPlus:0}}}}),i(e,"Series/Waterfall/WaterfallSeries.js",[e["Core/Series/SeriesRegistry.js"],e["Core/Utilities.js"],e["Core/Axis/WaterfallAxis.js"],e["Series/Waterfall/WaterfallPoint.js"],e["Series/Waterfall/WaterfallSeriesDefaults.js"]],function(t,e,i,s,o){let{column:a,line:r}=t.seriesTypes,{addEvent:n,arrayMax:l,arrayMin:h,correctFloat:p,crisp:d,extend:c,isNumber:u,merge:g,objectEach:f,pick:b}=e;function m(t,e){return Object.hasOwnProperty.call(t,e)}class y extends a{generatePoints(){a.prototype.generatePoints.apply(this);for(let t=0,e=this.points.length;t<e;t++){let e=this.points[t],i=this.processedYData[t];u(i)&&(e.isIntermediateSum||e.isSum)&&(e.y=p(i))}}processData(t){let e,i,s,o,a,r;let n=this.options,l=this.yData,h=n.data,d=l.length,c=n.threshold||0;s=i=o=a=0;for(let t=0;t<d;t++)r=l[t],e=h&&h[t]?h[t]:{},"sum"===r||e.isSum?l[t]=p(s):"intermediateSum"===r||e.isIntermediateSum?(l[t]=p(i),i=0):(s+=r,i+=r),o=Math.min(s,o),a=Math.max(s,a);super.processData.call(this,t),n.stacking||(this.dataMin=o+c,this.dataMax=a)}toYData(t){return t.isSum?"sum":t.isIntermediateSum?"intermediateSum":t.y}updateParallelArrays(t,e){super.updateParallelArrays.call(this,t,e),("sum"===this.yData[0]||"intermediateSum"===this.yData[0])&&(this.yData[0]=null)}pointAttribs(t,e){let i=this.options.upColor;i&&!t.options.color&&u(t.y)&&(t.color=t.y>0?i:void 0);let s=a.prototype.pointAttribs.call(this,t,e);return delete s.dashstyle,s}getGraphPath(){return[["M",0,0]]}getCrispPath(){let t=this.data.filter(t=>u(t.y)),e=this.yAxis,i=t.length,s=this.graph?.strokeWidth()||0,o=this.xAxis.reversed,a=this.yAxis.reversed,r=this.options.stacking,n=[];for(let l=1;l<i;l++){if(!(this.options.connectNulls||u(this.data[t[l].index-1].y)))continue;let i=t[l].box,h=t[l-1],p=h.y||0,c=t[l-1].box;if(!i||!c)continue;let g=e.waterfall.stacks[this.stackKey],f=p>0?-c.height:0;if(g&&c&&i){let t;let p=g[l-1];if(r){let i=p.connectorThreshold;t=d(e.translate(i,!1,!0,!1,!0)+(a?f:0),s)}else t=d(c.y+(h.minPointLengthOffset||0),s);n.push(["M",(c.x||0)+(o?0:c.width||0),t],["L",(i.x||0)+(o&&i.width||0),t])}if(c&&n.length&&(!r&&p<0&&!a||p>0&&a)){let t=n[n.length-2];t&&"number"==typeof t[2]&&(t[2]+=c.height||0);let e=n[n.length-1];e&&"number"==typeof e[2]&&(e[2]+=c.height||0)}}return n}drawGraph(){r.prototype.drawGraph.call(this),this.graph&&this.graph.attr({d:this.getCrispPath()})}setStackedPoints(t){let e=this.options,i=t.waterfall?.stacks,s=e.threshold||0,o=this.stackKey,a=this.xData,r=a.length,n=s,l=n,h,p=0,d=0,c=0,u,g,f,b,m,y,x,P,S=(t,e,i,s)=>{if(h){if(u)for(;i<u;i++)h.stackState[i]+=s;else h.stackState[0]=t,u=h.stackState.length;h.stackState.push(h.stackState[u-1]+e)}};if(t.stacking&&i&&this.reserveSpace()){P=i.changed,(x=i.alreadyChanged)&&0>x.indexOf(o)&&(P=!0),i[o]||(i[o]={});let t=i[o];if(t)for(let i=0;i<r;i++)(!t[y=a[i]]||P)&&(t[y]={negTotal:0,posTotal:0,stackTotal:0,threshold:0,stateIndex:0,stackState:[],label:P&&t[y]?t[y].label:void 0}),h=t[y],(m=this.yData[i])>=0?h.posTotal+=m:h.negTotal+=m,b=e.data[i],g=h.absolutePos=h.posTotal,f=h.absoluteNeg=h.negTotal,h.stackTotal=g+f,u=h.stackState.length,b&&b.isIntermediateSum?(S(c,d,0,c),c=d,d=s,n^=l,l^=n,n^=l):b&&b.isSum?(S(s,p,u,0),n=s):(S(n,m,0,p),b&&(p+=m,d+=m)),h.stateIndex++,h.threshold=n,n+=h.stackTotal;i.changed=!1,i.alreadyChanged||(i.alreadyChanged=[]),i.alreadyChanged.push(o)}}getExtremes(){let t,e,i;let s=this.options.stacking;return s?(t=this.yAxis.waterfall.stacks,e=this.stackedYNeg=[],i=this.stackedYPos=[],"overlap"===s?f(t[this.stackKey],function(t){e.push(h(t.stackState)),i.push(l(t.stackState))}):f(t[this.stackKey],function(t){e.push(t.negTotal+t.threshold),i.push(t.posTotal+t.threshold)}),{dataMin:h(e),dataMax:l(i)}):{dataMin:this.dataMin,dataMax:this.dataMax}}}return y.defaultOptions=g(a.defaultOptions,o),y.compose=i.compose,c(y.prototype,{pointValKey:"y",showLine:!0,pointClass:s}),n(y,"afterColumnTranslate",function(){let{options:t,points:e,yAxis:i}=this,s=b(t.minPointLength,5),o=s/2,a=t.threshold||0,r=t.stacking,n=i.waterfall.stacks[this.stackKey],l=a,h=a,p,f,y,x;for(let t=0;t<e.length;t++){let b=e[t],P=this.processedYData[t],S=c({x:0,y:0,width:0,height:0},b.shapeArgs||{});b.box=S;let M=[0,P],L=b.y||0;if(r){if(n){let e=n[t];"overlap"===r?(f=e.stackState[e.stateIndex--],p=L>=0?f:f-L,m(e,"absolutePos")&&delete e.absolutePos,m(e,"absoluteNeg")&&delete e.absoluteNeg):(L>=0?(f=e.threshold+e.posTotal,e.posTotal-=L,p=f):(f=e.threshold+e.negTotal,e.negTotal-=L,p=f-L),!e.posTotal&&u(e.absolutePos)&&m(e,"absolutePos")&&(e.posTotal=e.absolutePos,delete e.absolutePos),!e.negTotal&&u(e.absoluteNeg)&&m(e,"absoluteNeg")&&(e.negTotal=e.absoluteNeg,delete e.absoluteNeg)),b.isSum||(e.connectorThreshold=e.threshold+e.stackTotal),i.reversed?(y=L>=0?p-L:p+L,x=p):(y=p,x=p-L),b.below=y<=a,S.y=i.translate(y,!1,!0,!1,!0),S.height=Math.abs(S.y-i.translate(x,!1,!0,!1,!0));let s=i.waterfall.dummyStackItem;s&&(s.x=t,s.label=n[t].label,s.setOffset(this.pointXOffset||0,this.barW||0,this.stackedYNeg[t],this.stackedYPos[t],void 0,this.xAxis))}}else p=Math.max(h,h+L)+M[0],S.y=i.translate(p,!1,!0,!1,!0),b.isSum?(S.y=i.translate(M[1],!1,!0,!1,!0),S.height=Math.min(i.translate(M[0],!1,!0,!1,!0),i.len)-S.y,b.below=M[1]<=a):b.isIntermediateSum?(L>=0?(y=M[1]+l,x=l):(y=l,x=M[1]+l),i.reversed&&(y^=x,x^=y,y^=x),S.y=i.translate(y,!1,!0,!1,!0),S.height=Math.abs(S.y-Math.min(i.translate(x,!1,!0,!1,!0),i.len)),l+=M[1],b.below=y<=a):(S.height=P>0?i.translate(h,!1,!0,!1,!0)-S.y:i.translate(h,!1,!0,!1,!0)-i.translate(h-P,!1,!0,!1,!0),h+=P,b.below=h<a),S.height<0&&(S.y+=S.height,S.height*=-1);b.plotY=S.y,b.yBottom=S.y+S.height,S.height<=s&&!b.isNull?(S.height=s,S.y-=o,b.yBottom=S.y+S.height,b.plotY=S.y,L<0?b.minPointLengthOffset=-o:b.minPointLengthOffset=o):(b.isNull&&(S.width=0),b.minPointLengthOffset=0);let C=b.plotY+(b.negative?S.height:0);b.below&&(b.plotY+=S.height),b.tooltipPos&&(this.chart.inverted?b.tooltipPos[0]=i.len-C:b.tooltipPos[1]=C),b.isInside=this.isPointInside(b);let k=d(b.yBottom,this.borderWidth);S.y=d(S.y,this.borderWidth),S.height=k-S.y,g(!0,b.shapeArgs,S)}},{order:2}),t.registerSeriesType("waterfall",y),y}),i(e,"masters/highcharts-more.src.js",[e["Core/Globals.js"],e["Core/Series/SeriesRegistry.js"],e["Extensions/Pane/Pane.js"],e["Series/Bubble/BubbleSeries.js"],e["Series/PackedBubble/PackedBubbleSeries.js"],e["Series/PolarComposition.js"],e["Core/Axis/RadialAxis.js"],e["Series/Waterfall/WaterfallSeries.js"]],function(t,e,i,s,o,a,r,n){return t.RadialAxis=r,s.compose(t.Axis,t.Chart,t.Legend),o.compose(t.Axis,t.Chart,t.Legend),i.compose(t.Chart,t.Pointer),a.compose(t.Axis,t.Chart,t.Pointer,t.Series,t.Tick,t.Point,e.seriesTypes.areasplinerange,e.seriesTypes.column,e.seriesTypes.line,e.seriesTypes.spline),n.compose(t.Axis,t.Chart),t})});
File: src/Controller/Api/AttendanceListController.php
Match lines: 1
410| $participant->setArea($participantArea);
File: src/Controller/CognitiveAssessmentController.php
Match lines: 1
1185| $answer->setArea($question->getArea());
File: src/Controller/CrmLeadsController.php
Match lines: 2
8144| $captureForm->setArea($area);
8646| $captureForm->setArea($area);
File: src/Controller/ExperienciaprofissionalController.php
Match lines: 2
47| $entity->setArea($data['area'] ?? null);
124| $entity->setArea($data['area'] ?? null);
File: src/Controller/SpecialistController.php
Match lines: 4
6965| $previousExperience->setArea($previousExperienceData['area']);
6975| $experience->setArea($previousExperienceData['area']);
6978| $experience->setArea($previousExperienceData['area']);
7161| $experience->setArea($previousExperienceData['area'] ?? null);
File: src/Controller/TemplatesController.php
Match lines: 4
1963| $experience->setArea($previousExperienceData['area'] ?? null);
2352| $previousExperience->setArea($previousExperienceData['area']);
2363| $experience->setArea($previousExperienceData['area']);
2366| $experience->setArea($previousExperienceData['area']);
File: src/Controller/UserController.php
Match lines: 4
2846| $expectativadecontratacao->setArea(array_filter($areas));
2848| $expectativadecontratacao->setArea([]);
2882| $expectativadecontratacao->setAreaAtuacao(array_filter($areasAtuacao));
2884| $expectativadecontratacao->setAreaAtuacao([]);
File: src/Domains/FileManagement/v2/Entity/AttendanceListParticipant.php
Match lines: 1
100| public function setArea(?string $area): void
File: src/Entity/CaptureForm.php
Match lines: 1
151| public function setArea(?string $area): self
File: src/Entity/CognitiveAssessmentAnswer.php
Match lines: 1
135| public function setArea(string $area): self
File: src/Entity/CognitiveAssessmentQuestion.php
Match lines: 1
87| public function setArea(string $area): self
File: src/Entity/Contractor/ContractorDocumentRequirement.php
Match lines: 1
193| public function setArea(?string $area): self
File: src/Entity/DeiAssessmentAnswers.php
Match lines: 1
135| public function setArea(string $area): self
File: src/Entity/DeiAssessmentQuestion.php
Match lines: 1
87| public function setArea(string $area): self
File: src/Entity/EsocialEvtsTrabalhador/TrabSemVinculo.php
Match lines: 1
412| public function setAreaAtuacao($areaAtuacao): void
File: src/Entity/GovernanceAuthorization.php
Match lines: 1
345| public function setArea(?CompanyArea $area): self
File: src/Entity/SpecialistPreviousExperience.php
Match lines: 1
138| public function setArea($area)
File: src/Entity/UserExpectativacontratacao.php
Match lines: 2
127| public function setArea($area): self
206| public function setAreaAtuacao($areaAtuacao): self
File: src/Entity/UserExperienciaprofissional.php
Match lines: 1
121| public function setArea(?string $area): self
File: src/Repository/EsocialDadosTrabalhadorRepository.php
Match lines: 1
347| $trabSemVinc->setAreaAtuacao($data['areaAtuacao'] ?? null);
File: src/Service/Contractor/ContractorDocumentRequirementService.php
Match lines: 1
245| ->setArea($area !== '' ? $area : null)
File: src/Service/DeiAssessmentAnswersService.php
Match lines: 1
61| $answer->setArea($question->getArea());
File: src/Service/InterpersonalDynamicsService.php
Match lines: 1
74| $answer->setArea($question->getArea());
File: templates/process_department/components/_professional_area_form_modal.html.twig
Match lines: 3
307| function setAreaKnowledgeAreaDisplay(value) {
377| setAreaKnowledgeAreaDisplay(options.knowledgeAreaName || '');
595| setAreaKnowledgeAreaDisplay(area.knowledge_area ? area.knowledge_area.name : '');
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "setTipo"}
Result
File: docs/ia/CHAT_IA_DOCUMENTATION.md
Match lines: 1
2023| $solicitacao->setTipo($tipo);
File: src/Command/ImportContractorProviderCompaniesCommand.php
Match lines: 1
224| ->setTipo($tipoKey)
File: src/Controller/LicenseController.php
Match lines: 2
2004| $licenseCollective->setTipoAcidente($request->request->get('tipo_acidente'));
2033| $licenseCollective->setTipoProcessoRetificacao($request->request->get('tipo_processo_retificacao') ? (int)$request->request->get('tipo_processo_retificacao') : null);
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 4
23912| $abordagem->setTipoAtividade(trim((string) ($data['tipo_atividade'] ?? '')));
23913| $abordagem->setTipoAbordagem(trim((string) ($data['tipo_abordagem'] ?? '')));
24729| $nova->setTipoAtividade($original->getTipoAtividade());
24730| $nova->setTipoAbordagem($original->getTipoAbordagem());
File: src/Controller/UserAchievementController.php
Match lines: 2
42| $achievement->setTipo($tipo);
154| $achievement->setTipo($data['tipo']);
File: src/Controller/UserController.php
Match lines: 2
2861| $expectativadecontratacao->setTipoContratacao(array_filter($tipos));
2863| $expectativadecontratacao->setTipoContratacao([]);
File: src/Controller/UserProfileSkillController.php
Match lines: 1
54| $skill->setTipo($tipoSkill);
File: src/DataFixtures/EsocialAgentesNocivosEAtividadesFixtures.php
Match lines: 2
21| $existingData->setTipo($data['tipo']);
27| $entity->setTipo($data['tipo']);
File: src/DataFixtures/EsocialCompatibilidadeCategTrabalhadoresClassTributariaETiposLotacaoFixtures.php
Match lines: 2
23| $existingData->setTiposLotacao((array)$data['tiposLotacao']);
32| $entity->setTiposLotacao((array)$data['tiposLotacao']);
File: src/DataFixtures/EsocialCompatilibilidadeTiposDeLotacaoEClassificacaoTributariaFixtures.php
Match lines: 1
25| $entity->setTipoLotacao($data['tipoLotacao']);
File: src/Entity/Contractor/ContractorProviderCompany.php
Match lines: 1
216| public function setTipo(string $tipo): self
File: src/Entity/Despesa.php
Match lines: 3
39| public function setTipoDeItem(string $tipoDeItem): static
58| $reembolso->setTipoDeItem($this);
69| $reembolso->setTipoDeItem(null);
File: src/Entity/EsocialAgentesNocivosEAtividades.php
Match lines: 1
69| public function setTipo(string $tipo): self
File: src/Entity/EsocialCompatCategTrabalhadoresClassTribETpLotacao.php
Match lines: 1
74| public function setTiposLotacao(array $tiposLotacao): self
File: src/Entity/EsocialCompatTiposDeLotacaoEClassTributaria.php
Match lines: 1
40| public function setTipoLotacao(string $tipoLotacao): self
File: src/Entity/EsocialS1005EvtTabEstab.php
Match lines: 1
82| public function setTipoInsc($tipoInsc): void
File: src/Entity/GovernanceAuthorization.php
Match lines: 1
387| public function setTipo(?string $tipo): self
File: src/Entity/GovernanceCaseRecord.php
Match lines: 1
185| public function setTipo(string $tipo): self
File: src/Entity/GovernanceCaseRuntimeState.php
Match lines: 1
189| public function setTipo(string $tipo): self
File: src/Entity/LicenseCollective.php
Match lines: 2
524| public function setTipoAcidente(?string $tipo_acidente): self
645| public function setTipoProcessoRetificacao(?int $tipo_processo_retificacao): self
File: src/Entity/ProfileSkill.php
Match lines: 1
47| public function setTipo(string $tipo): self
File: src/Entity/Reembolsos.php
Match lines: 1
200| public function setTipoDeItem(?Despesa $tipoDeItem): static
File: src/Entity/SsmaAbordagem.php
Match lines: 2
299| public function setTipoAtividade(string $v): self { $this->tipoAtividade = $v; return $this; }
302| public function setTipoAbordagem(string $v): self { $this->tipoAbordagem = $v; return $this; }
File: src/Entity/UserAchievement.php
Match lines: 1
115| public function setTipo(string $tipo): self
File: src/Entity/UserExpectativacontratacao.php
Match lines: 1
155| public function setTipoContratacao($tipoContratacao): self
File: src/Repository/EsocialS1005EvtTabEstabRepository.php
Match lines: 1
108| $event->setTipoInsc($data['tipoInscricao']);
File: src/Service/Contractor/ContractorProviderCompanyService.php
Match lines: 1
185| ->setTipo($tipo)
File: src/Service/Governance/CaseAutomation/GovernanceCaseRuntimeStateService.php
Match lines: 2
33| $state->setTipo($defaultTipo);
73| $state->setTipo($newTipo);
File: src/Service/Governance/Grc/GovernanceCaseGrcEnrichmentService.php
Match lines: 1
173| $runtimeState->setTipo($monitoringTipo);
File: src/Service/MetaHuman/GovernanceCasesHubService.php
Match lines: 2
927| $record->setTipo($tipo);
1155| $runtimeState->setTipo($record->getTipo());
File: src/Service/MetaHuman/GovernanceCasesResolvedExampleSeeder.php
Match lines: 1
87| $record->setTipo($example['tipo']);
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaApproachSubmitService.php
Match lines: 2
296| $a->setTipoAtividade($this->draftScalarString($draft['tipo_atividade']));
297| $a->setTipoAbordagem($this->draftScalarString($draft['tipo_abordagem']));
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_config.html.twig
Match lines: 3
713| function setTipoSelectValue(val) {
1561| setTipoSelectValue('');
1600| setTipoSelectValue(item.tipo || '');
File: tests/Unit/Product/EmpresasParceiras/EmpresasParceirasTestCase.php
Match lines: 1
106| ->setTipo('operacional')
Request #13
deepseek-v4-flash
P:85.19K C:708 CR:46.08K CW:0
5878ms
Reasoning
Key insight: `GovernanceAuthorization::setArea`, `setTipo` exist, but I need to find where they're used. Search on GovernanceController for "setArea(" specifically in that file — not found, interesting. Let me check which call sites use `$aut->setArea` or the repository. Search in src for "setArea(?CompanyArea" no; search for usage of `->setArea(` in GovernanceController and `->setTipo(` in GovernanceController.
Actually the earlier search for `setAprovador` only found entity definitions. This strongly suggests `authorizationSave` does NOT persist the new fields. Let me search specifically within GovernanceController for `setTipo`, `setArea`, and the entity methods use. Wait, `setTipo` in GovernanceController's authorizationSave is not present because the save method only calls `setTitulo`, `setDescricao`, `setRequisitos`, `setContractorRequirementDependencies`, `setResponsavelMember`, `setStatus`, `setValidade`, `setEmitida`. There's no `setArea`, `setTipo`, `setAprovadorMember`, `setAprovadorRole`.
So the modal now sends `area_id`, `tipo`, `aprovador_id`, `aprovador_role_id`, but the backend `authorizationSave` ignores them — data loss when saving from this UI. This is exactly the risk noted in the PR description: "no review, conferir se authorizationSave já grava esses campos nesta entrega". Since the backend controller file is outside the review group, I should note in the review files (the create tab sends the payload) the contract is broken. This is a critical data issue for the PR: new fields sent but not persisted, so authorization created via UI doesn't save area/tipo/aprovador; and when editing existing authorization, the payload would also not update. Actually wait, if they don't persist, then editing doesn't produce errors but silently drops data. This deserves a comment attached to the payload lines in the create tab template.
However, I must be careful: is the backend part of this PR changed in a prior commit (merged cc-auth-config-model) maybe already saving? Let me re-read the authorizationSave function code thoroughly: yes it does not set new fields. Let me confirm whether there's some other service method used for saving these... In the code read above, after `setValidade(null)` and `setEmitida(null)`, `$em->flush()`, and history. It never sets area, tipo, aprovador member, or role. So if user saves authorization from this UI with area_id + tipo, it silently drops those.
Wait — I should double-check by searching for "area_id" in GovernanceController.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "area_id", "file_patterns": ["src/Controller/GovernanceController.php"]}
Result
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "data\\['area_id'\\]|data\\['tipo'\\]|data\\['aprovador"}
Result
No matches found
Request #14
deepseek-v4-flash
P:85.92K C:152 CR:85.89K CW:0
2005ms
Reasoning
Let me do another regex search that might work: search for "area_id" in the whole src/ folder.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "area_id", "file_patterns": ["src/"]}
Result
File: src/Controller/CompanyAreaController.php
Match lines: 2
290| $areaId = (int) $request->get('area_id');
367| $areaId = (int) $request->get('area_id');
File: src/Controller/CompanyMemberController.php
Match lines: 1
1969| 'innovation_area_id' => $sru->getStructuralResearch()->getId(),
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystem/FlowInstanceController.php
Match lines: 1
8134| 'professional_area_id'=> $survey->getProfessionalArea() ? $survey->getProfessionalArea()->getId() : null,
File: src/Controller/InnovationResearchController.php
Match lines: 10
953| 'innovation_area_id' => $sru->getStructuralResearch()->getId(),
7583| $sql .= " AND q.innovation_area_id = " . $innovationArea;
7635| $sql .= " AND q.innovation_area_id = " . $innovationArea;
7688| $sql .= " AND q.innovation_area_id = " . $innovationArea;
7837| srq.innovation_area_id = $innovationAreaId
9215| $data['__created_innovation_area_id'] = $ia->getId();
9328| if (empty($questionData['segmento']) && !empty($data['__created_innovation_area_id'])) {
9329| $createdIa = $entityManager->getRepository(InnovationArea::class)->find($data['__created_innovation_area_id']);
9543| if (empty($questionData['segmento']) && !empty($data['__created_innovation_area_id'])) {
9544| $createdIa = $entityManager->getRepository(InnovationArea::class)->find($data['__created_innovation_area_id']);
File: src/Controller/JobInterviewController.php
Match lines: 12
2929| $professionalAreaIds = $data['professional_area_ids'] ?? [];
2930| $professionalAreaId = $data['professional_area_id'] ?? null;
3253| 'professional_area_ids' => $request->request->all('professional_area_ids') ?: [],
3254| 'professional_area_id' => $request->request->get('professional_area_id'),
3262| if ($data['professional_area_id'] === '') {
3263| $data['professional_area_id'] = null;
3273| $data['professional_area_ids'] = array_filter($data['professional_area_ids'], fn($v) => $v !== '' && $v !== null);
4411| if (isset($data['professional_area_ids']) || isset($data['professional_area_id'])) {
4415| if (!empty($data['professional_area_ids']) && is_array($data['professional_area_ids'])) {
4416| $areaIds = array_filter($data['professional_area_ids'], fn($v) => $v !== '' && $v !== null);
4417| } elseif (!empty($data['professional_area_id']) && $data['professional_area_id'] !== '') {
4418| $areaIds = [$data['professional_area_id']];
File: src/Controller/PulseSurveyController.php
Match lines: 1
246| (int) ($data['professional_area_id'] ?? 0),
File: src/Controller/StructuralResearchController.php
Match lines: 4
2671| $sql .= " AND q.innovation_area_id = " . $innovationArea;
2720| $sql .= " AND q.innovation_area_id = " . $innovationArea;
2770| $sql .= " AND q.innovation_area_id = " . $innovationArea;
2908| srq.innovation_area_id = $innovationAreaId
File: src/Controller/StructuralResearchSurveyController.php
Match lines: 1
806| $professionalAreaId = (int) ($data['professional_area_id'] ?? 0);
File: src/Domains/FileManagement/v2/Service/Indexing/Classification/Rules/ProfessionalAreaDocumentTypeRule.php
Match lines: 1
48| $signals[] = 'text:professional_area_identity';
File: src/Entity/CompanyAreaResponsible.php
Match lines: 3
19| * @ORM\UniqueConstraint(name="uniq_company_area_responsible_pair", columns={"company_area_id", "company_member_id"})
22| * @ORM\Index(name="idx_company_area_responsible_area", columns={"company_area_id"}),
39| * @ORM\JoinColumn(name="company_area_id", referencedColumnName="id", nullable=false, onDelete="CASCADE")
File: src/Entity/CompanyAreaSynonym.php
Match lines: 2
13| * @ORM\UniqueConstraint(name="uniq_company_area_synonym_normalized", columns={"company_area_id", "normalized_synonym"})
16| * @ORM\Index(name="idx_company_area_synonym_company_area", columns={"company_area_id"}),
File: src/Entity/CompanyMemberArea.php
Match lines: 2
23| * @ORM\Index(name="idx_company_member_area_area", columns={"company_area_id"})
45| * @ORM\JoinColumn(name="company_area_id", referencedColumnName="id", nullable=false, onDelete="CASCADE")
File: src/Entity/GovernanceAuthorization.php
Match lines: 1
93| * @ORM\JoinColumn(name="area_id", referencedColumnName="id", nullable=true, onDelete="SET NULL")
File: src/Entity/JobInterviewTemplate.php
Match lines: 1
94| * inverseJoinColumns={@ORM\JoinColumn(name="professional_area_id", referencedColumnName="id", onDelete="CASCADE")}
File: src/Entity/StructuralResearchSurvey.php
Match lines: 1
89| * @ORM\JoinColumn(name="professional_area_id", referencedColumnName="id", nullable=true, onDelete="SET NULL")
File: src/Repository/GovernanceAuthorizationRepository.php
Match lines: 1
233| 'area_id' => $aut->getArea()?->getId(),
File: src/Service/Adriana/Questionnaire/Register/Handler/AssessmentRegisterHandler.php
Match lines: 1
186| $questionario['result']['innovation_area_id'] = $resultado['innovation_area_id'] ?? null;
File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowInstanceApplierService.php
Match lines: 1
359| $base['professional_area_id'] = (int) ($fields['professional_area_id'] ?? 0) ?: null;
File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowInstanceFieldCatalog.php
Match lines: 1
307| ['key' => 'professional_area_id', 'label' => 'Area profissional da pesquisa', 'type' => 'int', 'required' => false, 'options_source' => 'structural_professional_areas'],
File: src/Service/OrganizationalStructureViewBuilder.php
Match lines: 3
148| 'area_id' => $linkedAreaId,
463| 'area_id' => $areaIds[0] ?? null,
464| 'area_ids' => $areaIds,
File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/OrganizationalHealthService.php
Match lines: 13
1780| ct.id as area_id,
1822| $climaByArea[$row['area_id']] = [
1831| ct.id as area_id,
1871| $bemEstarByArea[$row['area_id']] = [
1881| ct.id as area_id,
1930| $ausenciaByArea[$row['area_id']] = [
1940| ct.id as area_id,
1984| $cuidadoByArea[$row['area_id']] = [
2935| ct.id as area_id,
3067| ct.id as area_id,
3101| $turnoverByArea[$row['area_id']] = [
3110| ct.id as area_id,
3145| $saudeByArea[$row['area_id']] = [
File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/ProjectionService.php
Match lines: 1
56| $whereClauses[] = "$memberAlias.area_id = :areaId";
File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/WelfareAbsenceService.php
Match lines: 6
2269| ct.id as area_id,
2289| ct.id as area_id,
2311| LEFT JOIN ausencias_por_area aa ON ba.area_id = aa.area_id
2419| ct.id as area_id,
2438| " . ($needsTeamJoinsLicencas ? 'ct_lic.id' : 'ct.id') . " as area_id,
2466| LEFT JOIN desligamentos_por_area da ON aa.area_id = da.area_id
File: src/Service/Products/PesquisaEstruturalBpmnService.php
Match lines: 1
1040| 'professionalAreaId' => $this->firstIntValue($data, ['professional_area_id', 'professionalAreaId', 'areaProfissionalId']),
File: src/Service/QuestionnaireProcessorService.php
Match lines: 4
1417| 'innovation_area_id' => $context['innovation_area_id'],
1483| 'innovation_area_id' => (int)$research->getId(),
14757| WHERE q.innovation_area_id = :innovationAreaId
14794| WHERE q.innovation_area_id = :innovationAreaId
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php
Match lines: 3
1500| (int) ($config['area_id'] ?? $config['company_area_id'] ?? $config['filter_value'] ?? 0)
1839| $areaId = (int) ($config['area_id'] ?? $config['company_area_id'] ?? $config['filter_value'] ?? 0);
1843| '[SSMA] notify_by_organizational_structure: nenhum membro para area_id=%s (occ=#%s)',
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaMemberOrganizationalManagementResolver.php
Match lines: 2
47| IDENTITY(memberArea.companyArea) AS area_id
55| $areaId = (int) ($memberAreaRow['area_id'] ?? 0);
File: src/Service/Tools/AssessmentInovacaoService.php
Match lines: 1
333| 'innovation_area_id' => null,
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "aprovador_id|aprovador_member_id", "file_patterns": ["src/"]}
Result
No matches found
Request #15
deepseek-v4-flash
P:88.43K C:1.48K CR:86.02K CW:0
13213ms
Reasoning
Confirmed: `authorizationSave` in GovernanceController does not read/set `area_id`, `aprovador_id`/`aprovador_member_id`, `tipo`, `aprovador_role_id`. So while the modal now collects and sends these new fields (required area and tipo), the backend silently ignores them, causing data loss: the created authorization won't persist area and tipo; editing older authorization with new fields will not update them. And reading back — toArray returns area_id etc. from columns that were never set (they'll be null).
Actually wait — could there be a Doctrine entity with a lifecycle event that handles area_id from payload? Unlikely.
But note: this is a backend issue in a file outside review_files. The review instruction says comments must address code within review_files — never produce comments targeting files outside it. We can, however, flag a cross-file inconsistency in a comment attached to the frontend line that sends the payload (the new fields added in `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig`). Since the frontend change is within review group, and the impact is that these required fields may not be persisted because the receiving controller in this same PR scope doesn't yet handle them (the PR explicitly says "conferir se authorizationSave já grava esses campos nesta entrega"), it's appropriate to comment.
Let me verify whether the controller is indeed unchanged/outside the PR scope. The listed changed files for the whole update: only templates in review_files + SsmaAutomationService (1 line removed). But the branch merged in the config model earlier commits. In the current review group only twig files are included. The diff shows the config save endpoint exists (migrations and controller exist already from merged model branch). Wait, but is GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController part of this PR? Not in the current change list; it exists in the repo already (from merged cc-auth-config-model).
Given the "review_files" only includes the twig files, my comments must be within those. I need to determine the definitive findings to place comments on the appropriate added lines.
Let me focus and verify remaining issues:
1. God template: yes, the code adds ~1500 lines inline script/style within twig. There are public/js/governance and public/css/governance folders in the project. That validates the concern. Comment on the settings tab file and modal add approver.
2. CSRF: The config save AJAX POST does not include CSRF token. However, the controller doesn't check CSRF either. The project pattern includes CSRF validation on some controllers but not all. Whether the endpoint is exposed without CSRF - well the authorizationConditionsSave in GovernanceController — need to check whether that one validates CSRF. Let me check that quickly to assess pattern. Actually the rule from user-specific rules: "Toda mutação via formulário/AJAX envia {{ csrf_token(...) }} e o backend deve validar." So project rules require it. The frontend sends no csrf token. This is a finding, but since backend doesn't validate (out of group), we frame the comment on frontend: missing CSRF token in POST autosave. Severity medium/high? Since backend not validating, it's a security concern (CSRF). And user rules mandate both sides. Comment: attach to the ajax call in settings tab.
Actually wait: the endpoint controller outside review group validates nothing but permission. The autosave sends JSON content. Without CSRF token, if backend were to add validation later it breaks. As is, no token means no CSRF protection on state-changing endpoint. I'll make comment on the persist() ajax call.
3. Visualizar button shown even without ssmaCanCreateAuthorization: It's a change in who can open details. Before, autActionsCell empty when ssmaCanCreateAuthorization false. Now a view-only action always rendered. The modal visualizar likely calls authorizationDetail (GET) which checks canAccessAuthorizationSupervisorSurface(). Hmm but does canAccessAuthorizationSupervisorSurface allow all users who can see the list? We need to understand the permission model. Let me check how canManageAuthorizations / canAccessAuthorizationSupervisorSurface are determined and whether a user who can view the list lacks create permission. But this template change shows view button for everyone; but only within tab where user can view authorizations list anyway. The concern is that a read-only user sees the detail modal (it may show full details of authorizations including requisitos). Is there an intended read permission? This may be acceptable. Given uncertainty, I'll consider low/medium. Let me examine the surrounding context in create tab to understand what group the list is rendered under and what other permissions gate. Perhaps a "visualizar" was previously also under create permission because only managers could see. Hmm. Actually the change made the view button show for everyone even without create permission. That could be an intentional UX (view for all users who have the tab open), but does list data itself appear without create permission? If aut list rows are rendered within the block `{% if ssmaCanCreateAuthorization ... %}`? Let me check the surrounding markup for tab_authorizations_create. Wait—the list was under create tab? Actually this list is the authorizations management list; maybe the tab is only visible to those who can manage. Let me check where the "Criar" tab appears; index.html.twig shows authorization tabs with conditions. Let me search for ssmaCanCreateAuthorization and the relevant tab gating in the files.
Let me search where `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig` is included and where these permissions get set, e.g., in GovernanceController authorizationIndex/hub. Also examine how the "Visualizar" detail modal is opened and via which endpoint (maybe it uses a "detail modal" with authorizationDetail GET which requires canAccessAuthorizationSupervisorSurface). If detail endpoint already checks supervisor surface, then showing the button to everyone is not a vulnerability as backend enforces access. The impact: click yields 403 for users who lack supervisor surface. Let me look more context.
Given time constraints, I'll prioritize major findings. Let me investigate #4 further: are `allMembers`, `aut_company_areas`, `aut_company_roles`, `aut_authorization_types` always provided to the modal? The modal file is included via index. Let me search for where the modal is included and hub variable assignments. Also `_modal_authorization_form` references `aut_company_roles` etc. Search inclusion.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "_modal_authorization_form"}
Result
File: docs/engineering/pr/new_staging2/PR_arquivos_new_staging2.txt
Match lines: 1
1514|A templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig
File: docs/engineering/pr/new_staging2/PR_impacto_new_staging2.txt
Match lines: 1
1514| .../partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig | 290 +
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig
Match lines: 2
14| - governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig
899|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig' with {
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "aut_company_areas|aut_company_roles|aut_authorization_types|allMembers", "file_patterns": ["src/"]}
Result
No matches found
Request #16
deepseek-v4-flash
P:90.11K C:151 CR:89.86K CW:0
2134ms
Reasoning
The search in src for variables aut_company_areas etc. returned no matches, which is surprising. Maybe the variables are set in the controller twig view arrays differently. Let me search the whole repo for `aut_company_areas`, `aut_company_roles`, `aut_authorization_types`, `allMembers`.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "aut_authorization_types"}
Result
File: src/Controller/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController.php
Match lines: 1
43| 'authorization_types' => $view['aut_authorization_types'],
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery.php
Match lines: 3
21| * aut_authorization_types: list<string>,
33| 'aut_authorization_types' => [],
45| * aut_authorization_types: list<string>,
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigService.php
Match lines: 2
32| * aut_authorization_types: list<string>,
50| 'aut_authorization_types' => $hasConfig ? $config->getTypeLabels() : [],
File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig
Match lines: 1
34|{% for typeLabel in aut_authorization_types|default([]) %}
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig
Match lines: 1
298| var initialTypes = {{ aut_authorization_types|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
File: tests/Unit/Product/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQueryTest.php
Match lines: 2
30| self::assertSame([], $view['aut_authorization_types']);
65| self::assertSame([], $view['aut_authorization_types']);
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "aut_company_areas"}
Result
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery.php
Match lines: 4
27| * aut_company_areas: list<array{id: int|null, name: string}>
39| 'aut_company_areas' => [],
51| * aut_company_areas: list<array{id: int|null, name: string}>
73| 'aut_company_areas' => $areas,
File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig
Match lines: 1
26|{% for area in aut_company_areas|default([]) %}
File: tests/Unit/Product/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQueryTest.php
Match lines: 2
32| self::assertSame([], $view['aut_company_areas']);
66| self::assertSame([['id' => 15, 'name' => 'Operações']], $view['aut_company_areas']);
Request #17
deepseek-v4-flash
P:90.82K C:112 CR:90.24K CW:0
2149ms
Reasoning
Let me look at where the variables get injected into the view. Look for where the hub query is used - probably GovernanceController authorizationIndex. Let me find `GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery` usage.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery", "file_patterns": ["src/"]}
Result
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php Match lines: 3 37|use App\Service\Governance\GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery; 66| private GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery $authorizationConfigHubQuery; 94| GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery $authorizationConfigHubQuery, File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery.php Match lines: 1 11|final class GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery
Request #18
deepseek-v4-flash
P:91.04K C:77 CR:90.88K CW:0
1825ms
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "authorizationConfigHubQuery->", "file_patterns": ["src/Controller/GovernanceController.php"]}
Result
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php Match lines: 1 1330| return array_merge($viewData, $autData, $this->authorizationConfigHubQuery->build($company), [
Request #19
deepseek-v4-flash
P:91.18K C:132 CR:91.01K CW:0
2057ms
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Controller/GovernanceController.php", "end_line": 1336, "start_line": 1300}
Result
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php (Total lines: 6066) IS_TRUNCATED: false LINE_RANGE: 1300-1336 1300| ) 1301| : [ 1302| 'aut_rows' => [], 1303| 'aut_all' => [], 1304| 'aut_ativas' => 0, 1305| 'aut_vencidas' => 0, 1306| 'aut_a_vencer' => 0, 1307| 'aut_colabs_sem_aut' => 0, 1308| 'aut_perc_conformidade' => 0, 1309| 'aut_teams_by_status' => [], 1310| 'aut_kpi_total' => 0, 1311| 'aut_kpi_ativas' => 0, 1312| 'aut_kpi_inativas' => 0, 1313| 'aut_kpi_colaboradores' => 0, 1314| 'aut_alertas' => [], 1315| 'aut_chart_data' => ['vencidas' => 0, 'proximos_30' => 0, 'dias_31_60' => 0, 'dias_61_90' => 0], 1316| 'aut_expired_by_team' => [], 1317| 'aut_requisitos_catalog' => AutorizacaoRequisitoCatalog::labelsOrdered(), 1318| ]; 1319| 1320| $autConditions = $company 1321| ? $this->authorizationConditionConfig->getConditionsForFrontend($company) 1322| : []; 1323| $contractorRequirements = $company 1324| ? array_values(array_filter( 1325| $this->contractorRequirementService->listForFrontend($company), 1326| static fn (array $requirement): bool => ($requirement['active'] ?? true) !== false 1327| )) 1328| : []; 1329| 1330| return array_merge($viewData, $autData, $this->authorizationConfigHubQuery->build($company), [ 1331| 'aut_conditions' => $autConditions, 1332| 'aut_classif_catalog' => GovernanceAuthorizationConditionConfigService::classificacoesPorTipo(), 1333| 'aut_contractor_requirements' => $contractorRequirements, 1334| ]); 1335| } 1336|
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery.php"}
Result
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery.php (Total lines: 77)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-77
1|<?php
2|
3|declare(strict_types=1);
4|
5|namespace App\Service\Governance;
6|
7|use App\Entity\Company;
8|use App\Entity\CompanyArea;
9|use App\Repository\CompanyAreaRepository;
10|
11|final class GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery
12|{
13| public function __construct(
14| private GovernanceAuthorizationConfigService $configService,
15| private CompanyAreaRepository $areaRepository,
16| ) {
17| }
18|
19| /**
20| * @return array{
21| * aut_authorization_types: list<string>,
22| * aut_authorization_use_members: bool,
23| * aut_authorization_use_roles: bool,
24| * aut_authorization_approver_members: list<array{id: int, name: string, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}>,
25| * aut_authorization_approver_roles: list<array{id: int, name: string, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}>,
26| * aut_company_roles: list<array{id: int, name: string}>,
27| * aut_company_areas: list<array{id: int|null, name: string}>
28| * }
29| */
30| public static function emptyView(): array
31| {
32| return [
33| 'aut_authorization_types' => [],
34| 'aut_authorization_use_members' => true,
35| 'aut_authorization_use_roles' => false,
36| 'aut_authorization_approver_members' => [],
37| 'aut_authorization_approver_roles' => [],
38| 'aut_company_roles' => [],
39| 'aut_company_areas' => [],
40| ];
41| }
42|
43| /**
44| * @return array{
45| * aut_authorization_types: list<string>,
46| * aut_authorization_use_members: bool,
47| * aut_authorization_use_roles: bool,
48| * aut_authorization_approver_members: list<array{id: int, name: string, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}>,
49| * aut_authorization_approver_roles: list<array{id: int, name: string, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}>,
50| * aut_company_roles: list<array{id: int, name: string}>,
51| * aut_company_areas: list<array{id: int|null, name: string}>
52| * }
53| */
54| public function build(?Company $company): array
55| {
56| if (!$company instanceof Company) {
57| return self::emptyView();
58| }
59|
60| $areas = [];
61| foreach ($this->areaRepository->findForCompany($company, true) as $area) {
62| if (!$area instanceof CompanyArea) {
63| continue;
64| }
65|
66| $areas[] = [
67| 'id' => $area->getId(),
68| 'name' => (string) $area->getName(),
69| ];
70| }
71|
72| return array_merge($this->configService->getViewData($company), [
73| 'aut_company_areas' => $areas,
74| ]);
75| }
76|}
77|
Request #20
deepseek-v4-flash
P:92.75K C:130 CR:91.26K CW:0
2136ms
Reasoning
Now `allMembers` — where is that injected? The modal uses `allMembers|default([])` and `aut_company_roles|default([])`. aut_company_roles is in hub query. allMembers maybe injected elsewhere. Let me search for allMembers in controller rendering of index (in the authorizationIndex function). Let's find where viewData is used with authorizationIndex template and 'allMembers'.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "allMembers"}
Result
Note: The results have been truncated. Only showing first 100 results.
File: docs/Flowable/PROJECT_ACOES_BPMN_SUGERIDAS.md
Match lines: 1
74|| `removeTaskMembers` | Remover membros | Via `ProjectAutomationService::removeAllMembersFromTask` | ✅ |
File: docs/ssma/ALINHAMENTO-TITULO-OPCIONAL-E-MEMBROS-SEM-ADMIN.md
Match lines: 1
139|3. Alinhar outras listagens SSMA de `allMembers` / catálogo se forem a mesma “lista de membros” do produto (mesmo critério: sem admin da tenant).
File: docs/ssma/engineering/badge_qr_data_extraction.md
Match lines: 1
17|7. `buildAuthorizationViewData()` tambem e enviado ao template, incluindo `aut_rows`, `aut_all`, `allMembers` e flags de permissao.
File: java/src/main/java/com/metahuman/services/organograma/OrganogramaService.java
Match lines: 1
478| public List<CompanyMemberDTO> listAllMembers(OrganogramaNodeDTO node) {
File: public/js/chat/features/chat-offcanvas-members.js
Match lines: 3
18| let allMembers = [];
35| const filteredMembers = allMembers.filter(member => {
68| allMembers = members;
File: public/js/projects/professional_project_popup_tags.js
Match lines: 2
2309| const allMembers = members.map(m => `
2325| ${allMembers}
File: public/js/projects/projects_popup_tags.js
Match lines: 2
2280| const allMembers = members.map(m => `
2296| ${allMembers}
File: public/js/ssma/ssma-member-picker.js
Match lines: 2
42| $.each(shared.allMembers || [], function (_, row) {
53| * Necessário em telas de detalhe (occurrence_view) onde allMembers está filtrado
File: src/Command/ProcessScheduledAutomationsCommand.php
Match lines: 2
332| $members = $this->findAllMembersInStage($stage, $limit);
426| private function findAllMembersInStage($stage, int $limit): array
File: src/Command/TestCognitiveInviteCommand.php
Match lines: 2
88| $allMembers = $this->em->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)
92| foreach ($allMembers as $m) {
File: src/Controller/Adriana/IaAssessmentController.php
Match lines: 6
2280| $allMembers = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\CompanyMembers::class)->findAll();
2281| $companyMembers = array_filter($allMembers, function ($cm) use ($teamId) {
3526| $allMembers = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\CompanyMembers::class)->findAll();
3527| $companyMembers = array_filter($allMembers, function ($cm) use ($teamId) {
5509| $allMembers = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\CompanyMembers::class)->findAll();
5525| foreach ($allMembers as $cm) {
File: src/Controller/Api/FileManagementV2Controller.php
Match lines: 1
453| $members = $this->membersRepo->findAllMembersByCompany($user->getCompany()->getId());
File: src/Controller/Api/OffboardingApiController.php
Match lines: 3
303| $allMembers = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingMember::class)
314| 'total_membros_no_offboarding' => count($allMembers),
318| foreach ($allMembers as $om) {
File: src/Controller/Api/PeopleAnalytics/PermissionsController.php
Match lines: 2
112| $allMembers = $this->companyMembersRepository->findBy([
118| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
File: src/Controller/CognitiveAssessmentController.php
Match lines: 4
4037| $allMembers = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\CompanyMembers::class)
4040| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
11717| $allMembers = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\CompanyMembers::class)
11721| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
File: src/Controller/CommunicationCenterController.php
Match lines: 2
1748| $allMembers = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)
1752| foreach ($allMembers as $m) {
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystem/FlowKanbanController.php
Match lines: 6
1027| $allMembers = [];
1030| $allMembers = $memberRepository->createQueryBuilder('m')
1037| $allMembers = $this->filterMembersForKanbanDisplay($allMembers);
1039| error_log('[KANBAN DEBUG] Total members encontrados: ' . count($allMembers));
1040| foreach ($allMembers as $debugMember) {
1049| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystem/FlowTemplateController.php
Match lines: 4
5217| $allMembers = $companyMembersRepo->findBy(['company' => $company, 'isRemoved' => false]);
5220| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
5333| $allMembers = $companyMembersRepo->findBy(['company' => $company, 'isRemoved' => false]);
5336| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystemController.php
Match lines: 7
13142| $allMembers = $companyMembersRepo->findBy(['company' => $company, 'isRemoved' => false]);
13145| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
15823| $allMembers = [];
15826| $allMembers = $memberRepository->createQueryBuilder('m')
15833| error_log('[KANBAN DEBUG] Total members encontrados: ' . count($allMembers));
15834| foreach ($allMembers as $debugMember) {
15843| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
File: src/Controller/GoalsController.php
Match lines: 2
272| $allMembers = $type === 'team' ? $goalArray['goal']['members'] : $companyMemberRepo->findBy(['company' => $companyId]);
273| $filteredMembers = array_filter($allMembers, function ($member) {
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php
Match lines: 10
1045| 'allMembers' => $viewData['allMembers'] ?? [],
1297| $viewData['allMembers'],
2932| $allMembers = [];
2949| $allMembers[] = [
2993| foreach ($allMembers as $memberIndex => $memberRow) {
2994| $allMembers[$memberIndex]['team_names'] = $memberTeamsMap[(int) $memberRow['id']] ?? [];
3001| 'allMembers' => $allMembers,
3013| private function loadAuthorizationsData(Company $company, array $allMembers, array $teams, ?array $visibleMemberIds = null): array
3059| foreach ($allMembers as $memberRow) {
3330| $totalMembers = count($allMembers);
File: src/Controller/LicenseController.php
Match lines: 23
1793| $allMembersSelected = true; // Pode ser passado como parâmetro se necessário
1796| $this->createS2230EventForTeamsWithCollectiveData($licenseTeams, $licenseCollective, $allMembersSelected);
2058| $allMembersSelected = $request->request->get('allMembersSelected') === 'true' || $request->request->get('allMembersSelected') === true;
2059| $this->logger->emergency('[addCollective] Todos os membros selecionados: ' . ($allMembersSelected ? 'SIM' : 'NÃO'));
2062| if ($allMembersSelected) {
2065| $unregisteredMembers = $this->checkUnregisteredMembersFromAllMembers($licenseCollective->getCompany());
2405| $allMembersSelected = $request->request->get('allMembersSelected') === 'true' || $request->request->get('allMembersSelected') === true;
2406| $this->logger->emergency('[addTeams] Todos os membros selecionados: ' . ($allMembersSelected ? 'SIM' : 'NÃO'));
2409| if ($allMembersSelected) {
2411| $unregisteredMembers = $this->checkUnregisteredMembersFromAllMembers($licensecollective->getCompany());
2435| $this->createS2230EventForTeamsWithCollectiveData($licenseTeams, $licensecollective, $allMembersSelected);
3680| private function checkUnregisteredMembersFromAllMembers(Company $company): array
3684| $this->logger->emergency('[checkUnregisteredMembersFromAllMembers] Iniciando verificação para empresa ID: ' . $company->getId());
3691| $this->logger->emergency('[checkUnregisteredMembersFromAllMembers] Total de membros encontrados na empresa: ' . count($companyMembers));
3694| $this->logger->emergency('[checkUnregisteredMembersFromAllMembers] Verificando membro ID: ' . $companyMember->getId() . ' - Nome: ' . $companyMember->getFullName());
3703| $this->logger->emergency('[checkUnregisteredMembersFromAllMembers] Membro NÃO tem cadastro no eSocial - ID: ' . $companyMember->getId() . ' - Nome: ' . $companyMember->getFullName());
3709| $this->logger->emergency('[checkUnregisteredMembersFromAllMembers] Membro TEM cadastro no eSocial - ID: ' . $companyMember->getId() . ' - Nome: ' . $companyMember->getFullName() . ' - eSocial ID: ' . $esocialTrabalhador->getId());
3713| $this->logger->emergency('[checkUnregisteredMembersFromAllMembers] Total de membros não cadastrados encontrados: ' . count($unregisteredMembers));
3714| $this->logger->emergency('[checkUnregisteredMembersFromAllMembers] Lista de membros não cadastrados: ' . json_encode($unregisteredMembers));
3941| private function createS2230EventForTeamsWithCollectiveData(LicenseTeams $licenseTeams, LicenseCollective $licenseCollective, bool $allMembersSelected = false): void
3957| $this->logger->emergency('[createS2230EventForTeamsWithCollectiveData] Todos os membros selecionados: ' . ($allMembersSelected ? 'SIM' : 'NÃO'));
3959| if (!$allMembersSelected && empty($selectedTeamsIds)) {
3975| if ($allMembersSelected) {
File: src/Controller/OnboardingStepController.php
Match lines: 2
410| $allMembers = $onboardingMemberRepository->findBy(['onboarding' => $onboardingStep->getOnboarding()]);
411| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
File: src/Controller/OrganogramaController.php
Match lines: 2
8951| $allMembers = $this->entityManager
8968| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
File: src/Controller/ProcessController.php
Match lines: 2
8402| $allMembers = $em->getRepository(FlowInstanceMember::class)->findBy([
8411| foreach ($allMembers as $m) {
File: src/Controller/Products/CrmBpmnController.php
Match lines: 6
372| $allMembers = [];
378| $allMembers[] = $m;
383| $stages = $this->buildKanbanStages($template, $allMembers, $company);
393| 'totalMembers' => count($allMembers),
1265| private function buildKanbanStages(FlowTemplate $template, array $allMembers, Company $company): array
1310| $allMembers,
File: src/Controller/ProfessionalAssessmentController.php
Match lines: 6
5736| $allMembers = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)
5741| }, $allMembers));
5773| $allMembers = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)
5778| }, $allMembers));
5787| $allMembers = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)
5791| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 100
721| ? $this->loadAutorizacoesData($company, $viewData['allMembers'], $viewData['teams'] ?? [])
804| $this->buildCauseTreeActionPlanViewOptions($viewData['allMembers'] ?? []),
844| * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $allMembers
847| private function buildCauseTreeActionPlanViewOptions(array $allMembers): array
851| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
2329| private function loadAutorizacoesData(Company $company, array $allMembers, array $teams): array
2500| $totalMembers = count($allMembers);
3034| $viewData['allMembers'] ?? [],
3172| $occurrence = $this->enrichOccurrenceAreaResponsible($occurrence, $company, $viewData['allMembers'] ?? []);
3297| * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $allMembers
3301| private function enrichOccurrenceAreaResponsible(array $occurrence, Company $company, array $allMembers): array
3343| foreach ($allMembers as $m) {
3486| $viewData['allMembers'] = $this->ssmaEnrichAllMembersForReport(
3487| $viewData['allMembers'] ?? [],
3835| $members = array_values($viewData['allMembers'] ?? []);
4050| * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $allMembers
4055| private function ssmaEnrichAllMembersForReport(array $allMembers, Company $company, array $memberIds): array
4058| return $allMembers;
4062| foreach ($allMembers as $index => $memberRow) {
4076| $allMembers[$indexById[$memberId]] = array_merge($allMembers[$indexById[$memberId]], $enriched);
4080| $allMembers[] = array_merge(['id' => $memberId], $enriched);
4083| return $allMembers;
7616| 'allMembers' => $viewData['allMembers'] ?? [],
8775| [$allMembers, $teams] = $this->loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite($company);
8789| foreach ($allMembers as $row) {
11576| $allMembers = [];
11585| [$allMembers, $teams] = $this->loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite($company);
11621| $allMembers = $this->enrichSsmaMemberRowsWithTeamMeta($allMembers, $teamNameByMemberId);
11666| $allMembers[] = [
11714| $memberIdsForShift = array_values(array_map(static fn (array $m): int => (int) $m['id'], $allMembers));
11741| foreach ($allMembers as $idx => $memberRow) {
11744| $allMembers[$idx]['work_shift_ids'] = $ids;
11745| $allMembers[$idx]['work_shift_id'] = $ids[0] ?? null;
11746| $allMembers[$idx]['work_shift_label'] = $this->resolveSsmaAbordagemTurnoLabel(
11784| $allMembers = $this->enrichSsmaMemberRowsWithTeamMeta($allMembers, $teamNameByMemberId);
11801| $row = $tagRepo->toArray($tag, $allMembers);
11823| $allMembers,
11832| $allMembers = $this->filterSsmaMembersToReferencedForDetail(
11833| $allMembers,
11856| $allMembers[] = $extraMember;
11903| $occurrences = $this->loadOccurrences($company, $allMembers, $teams, $pageSize, $offset);
11910| $occurrences = $this->loadOccurrences($company, $allMembers, $teams, $pageSize, $offset, $userTechnicalTypesEarly);
11940| $occurrences = $this->loadOccurrences($company, $allMembers, $teams, $pageSize, $offset, [], $teamIdInts, $memberIdsForTeam);
11945| $occurrences = $this->loadOccurrences($company, $allMembers, $teams, 500);
11949| $occurrences = $this->loadOccurrences($company, $allMembers, $teams, 500);
11953| $occurrences = $company ? $this->loadOccurrences($company, $allMembers, $teams) : [];
11991| $inspections = $company ? $this->loadInspections($company, $allMembers, $teams) : [];
12181| $allMembersForEventPeople = $allMembers;
12183| ? $this->buildSsmaEventModalGestores($company, $allMembers, $gestores, null)
12197| $allMembersForEventPeople = array_values(array_filter(
12198| $allMembers,
12204| $allMembers,
12223| $gestoresForEventModal = $allMembers !== [] ? $allMembers : $allMembersForEventPeople;
12225| if ($gestores === [] && $allMembers !== []) {
12226| $gestores = $allMembers;
12231| $allMembers,
12515| $membersForMetas = ($occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== null && $allMembersForEventPeople !== [])
12516| ? $allMembersForEventPeople
12517| : $allMembers;
12556| $allMembers = $this->filterSsmaMembersToReferencedForDetail(
12557| $allMembers,
12562| $allMembersForEventPeople = $this->filterSsmaMembersToReferencedForDetail(
12563| $allMembersForEventPeople,
12570| $allMembers = $this->sortSsmaMemberRowsByName($allMembers);
12571| $allMembersForEventPeople = $this->sortSsmaMemberRowsByName($allMembersForEventPeople);
12626| 'all_members_for_event_people' => $allMembersForEventPeople,
12640| 'allMembers' => $allMembers,
13736| * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $allMembers
13744| array $allMembers,
13748| $membersById = array_column($allMembers, null, 'id');
13786| * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $allMembers
13794| array $allMembers,
13835| return array_slice($allMembers, 0, 50);
13839| $allMembers,
14028| * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $allMembers
14035| array $allMembers,
14043| $membersById = array_column($allMembers, null, 'id');
15761| private function loadInspections(Company $company, array $allMembers, array $teams): array
15832| $membersById = array_column($allMembers, null, 'id');
17006| * @return array{occurrences: list<array<string, mixed>>, teams: list<array<string, mixed>>, allMembers: list<array<string, mixed>>}
17012| return ['occurrences' => [], 'teams' => [], 'allMembers' => []];
17018| $allMembers = [];
17030| $allMembers[] = [
17061| 'allMembers' => $allMembers,
18139| $allMembers = $viewData['allMembers'] ?? [];
18149| $allMembers,
18946| * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $allMembers
18968| array $allMembers,
18981| foreach ($allMembers as $m) {
19276| array $allMembers,
19289| foreach ($allMembers as $m) {
21550| $allMembers = [];
21571| $allMembers[] = [
21604| return [$allMembers, $teams];
21744| * allMembers: list<array<string, mixed>>
21765| $allMembers = [];
21774| $allMembers[] = [
21816| 'allMembers' => $allMembers,
24172| $allMembers = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)
24176| foreach ($allMembers as $m) {
File: src/Controller/TimeSheetV2Controller.php
Match lines: 9
1867| $allMembers = $this->companyMembersRepository->findBy([
1877| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
2553| $allMembers = $this->companyMembersRepository->findBy([
2568| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
2708| $allMembers = $this->companyMembersRepository->findBy([
2715| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
2875| $allMembers = $this->companyMembersRepository->findBy([
2880| if (empty($allMembers)) {
2893| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
File: src/Controller/WelfareHubController.php
Match lines: 15
1815| $allMembers = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)
1818| if (!empty($allMembers)) {
1820| ->findBy(['companyMember' => $allMembers]);
1840| $allMembersArray = [];
1841| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
1867| $allMembersArray[] = [
1911| foreach ($allMembersArray as $mdata) {
1992| // 'allMembers' => $allMembersArray,
2003| 'allMembers' => $allMembersArray,
2073| $allMembers = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)
2076| $allMembersArray = [];
2077| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
2081| $allMembersArray[] = [
2106| // 'allMembers' => $allMembersArray,
2120| 'allMembers' => $allMembersArray,
File: src/Domains/FileManagement/v2/AttendanceList/AttendanceListService.php
Match lines: 1
352| $companyMemberRows = $this->companyMembersRepository->findAllMembersByCompany((int) $company->getId());
File: src/Domains/FileManagement/v2/Service/FileManagementService.php
Match lines: 1
212| $members = $this->companyMembersRepo->findAllMembersByCompany((int)$ownerCompanyId);
File: src/EventListener/FlowStageEventListener.php
Match lines: 3
1798| $allMembers = $this->entityManager->getRepository(FlowInstanceMember::class)
1801| foreach ($allMembers as $m) {
1857| foreach ($allMembers as $m) {
File: src/Repository/CompanyMembersRepository.php
Match lines: 1
258| public function findAllMembersByCompany(int $companyId, ?string $term = null): array
File: src/Repository/SsmaPermissionTagRepository.php
Match lines: 3
58| public function toArray(SsmaPermissionTag $tag, array $allMembers = []): array
71| if (!empty($allMembers)) {
72| foreach ($allMembers as $m) {
File: src/Service/Ata/AtaFieldResolver.php
Match lines: 3
323| $allMembers = $this->entityManager->getConnection()->fetchAllAssociative(
332| if (empty($allMembers)) {
343| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
File: src/Service/Contractor/ContractorProviderCompanyService.php
Match lines: 2
318| $allMembers = $this->companyMembersRepository->findBy([
326| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
File: src/Service/Goals/GoalManagementPageService.php
Match lines: 3
248| * @param CompanyMembers[] $allMembers
251| private function filterNonAdminMembers(array $allMembers): array
255| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
File: src/Service/Goals/Pdi/PdiCollaboratorFilterService.php
Match lines: 19
36| * @param CompanyMembers[] $allMembers
41| array $allMembers,
49| return $allMembers;
65| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
124| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
168| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
188| return $allMembers;
192| * @param CompanyMembers[] $allMembers
197| array $allMembers,
211| return $filterMembersForSelect($allMembers);
224| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
264| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
275| return $filterMembersForSelect($allMembers);
279| * @param CompanyMembers[] $allMembers
284| array $allMembers,
293| $teamMembers = $allMembers;
304| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
338| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
346| $teamMembers = $allMembers;
File: src/Service/Goals/Pdi/PdiIndexService.php
Match lines: 5
47| $allMembers = $companyMemberRepo->findBy(['company' => $company]);
119| $allMembers,
128| $allMembers,
176| // Responsáveis podem ser managers — usa $allMembers sem filtrar managers
178| $allMembers,
File: src/Service/KanbanFlowableSyncService.php
Match lines: 2
893| $allMembers = $this->entityManager->getRepository(FlowInstanceMember::class)->findBy([
897| foreach ($allMembers as $m) {
File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/PeopleAnalyticsPermissionService.php
Match lines: 2
270| return $this->getAllMembers();
451| private function getAllMembers(): array
File: src/Service/Products/AbstractGroupCycleStageBpmnService.php
Match lines: 2
355| $allMembers = $this->entityManager->getRepository(FlowInstanceMember::class)
397| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
File: src/Service/ProjectAutomationService.php
Match lines: 2
419| $resultado = $this->removeAllMembersFromTask($task);
793| private function removeAllMembersFromTask(ProjectTasks $task)
File: src/Service/SafetyEnvironmentService.php
Match lines: 4
745| $allMembers = $this->em->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->findBy([
750| foreach ($allMembers as $m) {
798| $allMembers = $this->em->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->findBy([
802| foreach ($allMembers as $m) {
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php
Match lines: 2
1762| $allMembers = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)
1766| foreach ($allMembers as $m) {
File: src/Twig/MemberPermissionExtension.php
Match lines: 16
4609| $allMembers = $this->em->getRepository(\App\Entity\CompanyMembers::class)
4614| }, $allMembers);
4626| $allMembers = $this->em->getRepository(\App\Entity\CompanyMembers::class)
4631| }, $allMembers);
4827| $allMembers = $this->em->getRepository(\App\Entity\CompanyMembers::class)
4832| }, $allMembers));
4844| $allMembers = $this->em->getRepository(\App\Entity\CompanyMembers::class)
4849| }, $allMembers));
5043| $allMembers = $this->em->getRepository(\App\Entity\CompanyMembers::class)
5048| }, $allMembers));
5060| $allMembers = $this->em->getRepository(\App\Entity\CompanyMembers::class)
5065| }, $allMembers));
5372| $allMembers = $this->em->getRepository(\App\Entity\CompanyMembers::class)
5377| }, $allMembers);
5387| $allMembers = $this->em->getRepository(\App\Entity\CompanyMembers::class)
5392| }, $allMembers);
File: templates/ai_training_modules/index.html.twig
Match lines: 22
198| #selectAllMembers,
200| #inviteSelectAllMembers,
216| #selectAllMembers:checked,
218| #inviteSelectAllMembers:checked,
225| #selectAllMembers:checked::after,
227| #inviteSelectAllMembers:checked::after,
242| #selectAllMembers:hover,
244| #inviteSelectAllMembers:hover,
697| <th><input type="checkbox" id="inviteSelectAllMembers"></th>
1025| {'title': '<input type="checkbox" id="selectAllMembers" style="cursor:pointer;">'},
1426| var allMembers = [];
1434| return allMembers.filter(function(m) {
1446| allMembers = data.members || [];
1534| window.aiMgmtGetMembers = function() { return allMembers; };
1578| var selectAll = document.getElementById('selectAllMembers');
1877| var _allMembers = []; // todos os membros carregados da API
1902| if (_allMembers.length === 0) loadParticipants();
1909| var selAll = document.getElementById('selectAllMembers');
1926| _allMembers = data.members || [];
1952| var filtered = _allMembers.filter(function(m) {
1987| syncSelectAll('inviteSelectAllMembers', 'invite-member-cb');
2002| document.getElementById('inviteSelectAllMembers').addEventListener('change', function() {
File: templates/calendar_member/calendar_member_old.html.twig
Match lines: 2
2072| let allMembersSelected = $('.member_checkbox').length === $('.member_checkbox:checked').length;
2073| $('#calendar_select_all_members_checkbox').prop('checked', allMembersSelected);
File: templates/calendar_member/tabs/_calendar_tab.html.twig
Match lines: 2
7172| let allMembersSelected = $('.member_checkbox').length === $('.member_checkbox:checked').length;
7173| $('#calendar_select_all_members_checkbox').prop('checked', allMembersSelected);
File: templates/calendar_member/tabs/_calendar_tab_old.html.twig
Match lines: 2
2033| let allMembersSelected = $('.member_checkbox').length === $('.member_checkbox:checked').length;
2034| $('#calendar_select_all_members_checkbox').prop('checked', allMembersSelected);
File: templates/cognitive_assessment/IMPLEMENTATION_GUIDE.md
Match lines: 3
553| $allMembers = $this->entityManager
557| if (empty($allMembers)) {
565| foreach ($allMembers as $member) {
File: templates/company/team.html.twig
Match lines: 1
833| const allMembers = [...new Set([...existingMembers, ...selectedMembers])];
File: templates/company/team_v2.html.twig
Match lines: 1
1068| const allMembers = [...new Set([...existingMembers, ...selectedMembers])];
File: templates/contractor/index.html.twig
Match lines: 1
14| allMembers: allMembers|default([]),
File: templates/cultural_hub/active_voice/active_voice_index.html.twig
Match lines: 3
1792| const allMembers = Array.from(new Set(occurrencesData.map(o => (o.author && o.author.name) || ''))).filter(Boolean).sort();
1804| .concat(allMembers.map(n => `<option value="${$('<div>').text(n).html()}">${$('<div>').text(n).html()}</option>`));
1826| const memberSet = memberVal ? new Set([memberVal]) : new Set(allMembers);
File: templates/cultural_hub/active_voice/tabs/painel.html.twig
Match lines: 5
365| allMembers: dashboardData.members || [],
777| const selectedEmployee = panelData.allMembers.find(member => member.id == employeeId);
1076| const topMember = panelData.allMembers
1096| const selectedMember = panelData.allMembers.find(member => member.id == memberId);
1136| const sortedMembers = panelData.allMembers
File: templates/decision_system/automations/new_automation.html.twig
Match lines: 5
6154| var _allMembers = [];
6160| ? _allMembers.filter(function (m) {
6164| : _allMembers;
6209| _allMembers = (data.success && data.members) ? data.members : [];
6212| searchInput.disabled = _allMembers.length === 0;
File: templates/decision_system/tabs/_lista.html.twig
Match lines: 13
469| allMembers: [], // Cache de todos os membros
612| if (listaConfig.allMembers.length === 0) {
709| console.log('✅ Lista data loaded:', listaConfig.allMembers.length, 'members');
730| listaConfig.allMembers = [];
754| listaConfig.allMembers.push(member);
811| listaConfig.allMembers.push(member);
831| listaConfig.allMembers.push(member);
851| listaConfig.allMembers.push(member);
867| listaConfig.allMembers.push(member);
874| listaConfig.totalItems = listaConfig.allMembers.length;
884| console.log('📊 Lista: Processados', listaConfig.allMembers.length, 'membros');
893| listaConfig.filteredMembers = listaConfig.allMembers.filter(function(member) {
1121| listaConfig.allMembers = [];
File: templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig
Match lines: 1
16| allMembers: allMembers|default([]),
File: templates/governance/authorization/monitoring.html.twig
Match lines: 2
14| {% include 'ssma/partials/_shared_module_assets.html.twig' with { allMembers: allMembers|default([]) } %}
74| allMembers: allMembers|default([])
File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_apply_authorization.html.twig
Match lines: 1
38| {% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig
Match lines: 2
2|{% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
10|{% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_monitoring_panel.html.twig
Match lines: 1
128| allMembers: allMembers|default([])
File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_monitoring_row_actions.html.twig
Match lines: 1
2|{% set memberInfo = allMembers|default([])|filter(m => (m.id ~ '') == (row.member_id ~ ''))|first %}
File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_offcanvas_apply_authorization_monitoring.html.twig
Match lines: 1
43| {% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_config.html.twig
Match lines: 3
767| var members = (window.SsmaShared && window.SsmaShared.allMembers) || [];
785| var members = (window.SsmaShared && window.SsmaShared.allMembers) || [];
803| var members = (window.SsmaShared && window.SsmaShared.allMembers) || [];
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig
Match lines: 1
900| allMembers: allMembers|default([]),
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_monitoring.html.twig
Match lines: 2
1011| var AUT_APPLY_MEMBERS = {{ allMembers|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
1918| var members = shared.allMembers || [];
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig
Match lines: 1
321| var catalogMembers = {{ allMembers|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/governance/badge/index.html.twig
Match lines: 1
10| {% include 'ssma/partials/_shared_module_assets.html.twig' with { allMembers: allMembers|default([]) } %}
File: templates/governance/cases/automations/new_automation.html.twig
Match lines: 5
4097| var _allMembers = [];
4103| ? _allMembers.filter(function (m) {
4107| : _allMembers;
4152| _allMembers = (data.success && data.members) ? data.members : [];
4155| searchInput.disabled = _allMembers.length === 0;
File: templates/governance/cases/index.html.twig
Match lines: 2
17| {% include 'ssma/partials/_shared_module_assets.html.twig' with { allMembers: allMembers|default([]) } %}
1383| var members = (window.shared && window.shared.allMembers) ? window.shared.allMembers : [];
File: templates/governance/cases/partials/_gc_det_exception_inline_form.html.twig
Match lines: 1
51| {% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
File: templates/governance/cases/partials/_gc_det_section_associated_people.html.twig
Match lines: 1
18| {% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
File: templates/governance/cases/partials/_gc_det_section_exception.html.twig
Match lines: 1
35| allMembers: allMembers|default([]),
File: templates/governance/cases/partials/_modal_cases_assign.html.twig
Match lines: 1
25| {% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
File: templates/governance/cases/partials/_offcanvas_case_detail_body.html.twig
Match lines: 3
8|{% set allMembers = allMembers|default([]) %}
48| {% for member in allMembers %}
60| allMembers: allMembers
File: templates/governance/cases/partials/_offcanvas_case_detail_grc_body.html.twig
Match lines: 2
31| allMembers: allMembers|default([])
38| allMembers: allMembers|default([])
File: templates/manager/ssma/abordagem_report.html.twig
Match lines: 1
756|{% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
File: templates/manager/ssma/inspection_report.html.twig
Match lines: 1
650|{% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
File: templates/manager/ssma/report.html.twig
Match lines: 1
930|{% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
File: templates/spaces_control/buildings/index.html.twig
Match lines: 1
31| allMembers: locationMembers|default([])
File: templates/spaces_control/floor_plan/tabs/_tab_collaborators.html.twig
Match lines: 3
1403| const allMembers = companyMembersData.map(member => {
1411| if (allMembers.length === 0) {
1416| container.innerHTML = allMembers.map(member => `
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/index.html.twig
Match lines: 3
7| {% include 'ssma/partials/_shared_module_assets.html.twig' with { allMembers: allMembers|default([]) } %}
46| allMembers: allMembers|default([]),
62| allMembers: allMembers|default([]),
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_table.html.twig
Match lines: 1
2|{% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_action_plan.html.twig
Match lines: 1
247| allMembers: allMembers,
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_action_plan_config.html.twig
Match lines: 5
15| - allMembers (array) lista de membros da empresa
19|{# ── Deduz cargos únicos a partir de allMembers ── #}
21|{% for m in allMembers|default([]) %}
418| var vcAllMembers = {{ allMembers|json_encode|raw }};
514| return vcAllMembers.map(function(m){ return {value: m.id, label: m.name}; });
File: templates/ssma/cause_tree/index.html.twig
Match lines: 1
5| {% include 'ssma/partials/_shared_module_assets.html.twig' with { allMembers: allMembers|default([]) } %}
File: templates/ssma/cause_tree/tree_view/index.html.twig
Match lines: 3
227| {% include 'ssma/partials/_shared_module_assets.html.twig' with { allMembers: allMembers|default([]) } %}
248| {% for m in allMembers|default([]) %}
479| var members = {{ (allMembers|default([]))|json_encode|raw }} || [];
File: templates/ssma/cause_tree/tree_view/tabs/_tab_action_plan.html.twig
Match lines: 3
196| {% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
253| {% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
260| {% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/deep_dive_group.html.twig
Match lines: 1
6| allMembers: allMembers|default([])
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/index.html.twig
Match lines: 5
24| {% include 'ssma/partials/_shared_module_assets.html.twig' with { allMembers: allMembers|default([]) } %}
104| allMembers: allMembers|default([]),
110| {% set _membersForModal = ssma_apply_team_event_scope|default(false) ? all_members_for_event_people|default([]) : allMembers|default([]) %}
115| allMembers: _membersForModal,
116| allMembersForMeta: allMembers|default([]),
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig
Match lines: 7
491|{% for member in allMembers %}
555| allMembers: allMembers|default([])
1298| allMembers: allMembers
1305| {% set _membersForModal = ssma_apply_team_event_scope|default(false) ? all_members_for_event_people|default([]) : allMembers|default([]) %}
1309| allMembers: _membersForModal,
1310| allMembersForMeta: allMembers|default([]),
1367| var allMembersList = shared.allMembers || {{ allMembers|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig
Match lines: 7
263| {% for member in allMembers %}
280| {% for member in allMembers %}
489| {% for member in allMembers %}
637| {% for member in allMembers %}
922| {% for member in allMembers %}
1450| {% for m in allMembersForMeta|default(allMembers|default([])) %}
1532| {% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_occurrence.html.twig
Match lines: 3
148| {% for member in allMembers %}
201| {# TODO: responsible list mirrors allMembers from back-end #}
205| {% for member in allMembers %}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/tabs/_tab_occurrences.html.twig
Match lines: 2
65|{% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
1012| var ALL_MEMBERS = shared.allMembers || {{ allMembers|default([])|json_encode(2097153)|default('[]')|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/partials/_modal_action.html.twig
Match lines: 4
7| - allMembers : array — list of members for the "Responsáveis" tag select
606| {% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
620| {% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
774| {% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
File: templates/ssma/partials/_modal_action_resolution.html.twig
Match lines: 4
290| var allMembers = [];
298| if (allMembers.length) return;
300| allMembers = data.members || [];
326| var filtered = allMembers.filter(function (m) {
File: templates/ssma/partials/_shared_module_assets.html.twig
Match lines: 6
421| members: allMembers|default([]),
422| max_visible: allMembers|default([])|length,
471| shared.allMembers = {{ allMembers|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
476| $.each(shared.allMembers, function (_, member) {
526| var $circles = $('#ssma-shared-avatar-source .member-avatar-circle').slice(0, shared.allMembers.length);
529| var member = shared.allMembers[index];
File: templates/ssma/prevention/approach/index.html.twig
Match lines: 4
36|{% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
42|{% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
80| allMembers: allMembers|default([]),
706| allMembers: allMembers|default([])
File: templates/ssma/prevention/index.html.twig
Match lines: 6
8| allMembers: allMembers|default([]),
113| allMembers: allMembers|default([])
117| {% set _membersForModal = ssma_apply_team_event_scope|default(false) ? all_members_for_event_people|default([]) : allMembers|default([]) %}
121| allMembers: _membersForModal
128| allMembers: _membersForModal,
133| allMembers: allMembers|default([])
File: templates/ssma/prevention/inspection/index.html.twig
Match lines: 5
134|{% for member in allMembers %}
151| allMembers: allMembers|default([]),
635| allMembers: allMembers
640| allMembers: allMembers,
650| var allMembersList = shared.allMembers || {{ allMembers|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/prevention/modals/_modal_approach.html.twig
Match lines: 5
6| - allMembers : array — membros da empresa (id, name)
13|{% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
859| {% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
1320| {% for m in allMembers|default([]) %}
1343| {% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
File: templates/ssma/prevention/modals/_modal_inspection.html.twig
Match lines: 4
342| {% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
376| {% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
393| {% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
677| {% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
File: templates/ssma/prevention/partials/_meta_abono_section.html.twig
Match lines: 1
218| {% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
File: templates/ssma/prevention/tabs/_tab_prevention_config.html.twig
Match lines: 1
990| var abonoApproverMemberSeed = buildAbonoApproverOptionsFromMembers({{ allMembers|default([])|json_encode|raw }});
File: templates/ssma/prevention/tabs/_tab_prevention_goals.html.twig
Match lines: 1
460| {% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
File: templates/ssma/refusal/index.html.twig
Match lines: 1
59| {% include 'ssma/partials/_shared_module_assets.html.twig' with { allMembers: allMembers|default([]) } %}
File: templates/ssma/refusal/partials/_modal_register.html.twig
Match lines: 2
190| {% for m in allMembers|default([]) %}
202| {% for m in allMembers|default([]) %}
File: templates/ssma/refusal/tabs/_tab_config.html.twig
Match lines: 4
12| {% for m in allMembers|default([]) %}
21| {% for m in allMembers|default([]) %}
44| {% for m in allMembers|default([]) %}
53| {% for m in allMembers|default([]) %}
File: templates/ssma/refusal/tabs/_tab_list.html.twig
Match lines: 1
12|{% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
File: templates/templates/licenses_implantation.html.twig
Match lines: 2
1679| licenseToUpdate.allMembersSelected = $('#select_all_members_checkbox').is(':checked');
1683| console.log('All members selected:', licenseToUpdate.allMembersSelected);
File: templates/welfare_hub/hire_professional/profile.html.twig
Match lines: 1
35| {% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
File: templates/welfare_hub/hire_professional/tabs/configuracoes.html.twig
Match lines: 2
3|{% for m in allMembers %}
100| {% for m in allMembers %}
File: tests/Unit/Product/DocumentTemplatesSignature/AttendanceListControllerTest.php
Match lines: 1
48| $companyMembers->method('findAllMembersByCompany')->willReturn([['user_id' => 20]]);
File: tests/Unit/Product/DocumentTemplatesSignature/AttendanceListServiceTest.php
Match lines: 3
64| $companyMembers->method('findAllMembersByCompany')->with(7)
101| $companyMembers->method('findAllMembersByCompany')->willReturn([['user_id' => 20]]);
126| $companyMembers->method('findAllMembersByCompany')->willReturn([['user_id' => 99]]);
File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaOccurrenceAreaResponsibleTest.php
Match lines: 2
29| $allMembers = [
37| [$occurrence, $company, $allMembers]
Request #21
deepseek-v4-flash
P:104.53K C:334 CR:92.8K CW:0
4642ms
Reasoning
OK, in `src/Controller/GovernanceController.php` line 1330 area view includes `$this->authorizationConfigHubQuery->build($company)` with keys `aut_authorization_types`, `aut_authorization_use_members`, `aut_authorization_use_roles`, `aut_authorization_approver_members`, `aut_authorization_approver_roles`, `aut_company_roles`, `aut_company_areas` — all there. `allMembers` is passed at line 1045 and in viewData.
Now let me confirm the settings tab includes in the tab bar, gated by ssmaCanManageConfig. That matches.
Now, importantly: it looks like the current page (index of governance authorization) includes the modal, hub with all variables, so the contract is satisfied in that context. The view-only visualizar concern: Let's read the diff section in create tab to understand where this table lives & permission. Let me read around lines 700-830 of `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig` to understand the block gating, plus the visualizar handler.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig", "start_line": 560, "end_line": 830}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig (Total lines: 2423)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 560-830
560| {% include 'components/ui/_search_expandable.html.twig' with {
561| id: 'aut-criar-search',
562| placeholder: 'Buscar autorização'
563| } %}
564| </div>
565| </div>
566|</div>
567|
568|{% set aut_criar_mobile_search %}
569| <div class="mobile-search-input-wrapper">
570| <input type="text" class="mobile-search-input" id="aut-criar-search-mobile-input" placeholder="Buscar autorização">
571| <i class="fas fa-search"></i>
572| </div>
573|{% endset %}
574|
575|{% set aut_criar_mobile_filters %}
576| {{ include('components/ui/_mobile_select_fullscreen.html.twig', {
577| id: 'autCriarRequisitoFilterMobile',
578| name: 'autCriarRequisitoFilterMobile',
579| label: 'Requisito',
580| options: aut_criar_requisito_filter_options
581| }) }}
582| {{ include('components/ui/_mobile_select_fullscreen.html.twig', {
583| id: 'autCriarStatusFilterMobile',
584| name: 'autCriarStatusFilterMobile',
585| label: 'Status',
586| options: aut_criar_status_filter_options
587| }) }}
588|{% endset %}
589|
590|{% set aut_criar_fab_buttons = [
591| {
592| 'id': 'fab-filter-aut-criar',
593| 'icon': 'fa-solid fa-bars-filter',
594| 'style': 'secondary',
595| 'class': 'open-bottom-sheet-autCriarFiltersMobile',
596| 'tooltip': 'Filtros'
597| },
598| {
599| 'id': 'fab-toggle-aut-view',
600| 'icon': 'fa-solid fa-table-list',
601| 'style': 'secondary',
602| 'class': 'occ-view-toggle',
603| 'tooltip': 'Alternar visualização'
604| }
605|] %}
606|{% if ssmaCanCreateAuthorization|default(false) %}
607| {% set aut_criar_fab_buttons = aut_criar_fab_buttons|merge([{
608| 'id': 'fab-add-aut-criar',
609| 'icon': 'fas fa-plus',
610| 'style': 'primary',
611| 'class': 'js-aut-criar-open-modal',
612| 'tooltip': 'Criar autorização'
613| }]) %}
614|{% endif %}
615|
616|{% include 'components/ui/_mobile_fabs.html.twig' with {
617| buttons: aut_criar_fab_buttons
618|} %}
619|
620|{{ include('components/ui/_mobile_bottom_sheet.html.twig', {
621| id: 'autCriarFiltersMobile',
622| title: 'Filtros',
623| trigger_class: '.open-bottom-sheet-autCriarFiltersMobile',
624| search: aut_criar_mobile_search,
625| filters: aut_criar_mobile_filters,
626| clear_filters: { 'class': 'aut-criar-mobile-clear-filters', 'label': 'Limpar Filtros' }
627|}) }}
628|
629|<div class="members-content p-3">
630|
631| {% if aut_all|length == 0 %}
632|
633| {% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_empty_state_authorizations.html.twig' with {
634| show_cta: ssmaCanCreateAuthorization|default(false)
635| } %}
636|
637| {% else %}
638|
639| <div class="aut-criar-cards-stack">
640| <div class="aut-criar-cards-grid">
641| {% include 'components/ui/_card.html.twig' with {
642| title: 'Total de Autorizações',
643| value: aut_kpi_total
644| } %}
645| {% include 'components/ui/_card.html.twig' with {
646| title: 'Autorizações Ativas',
647| value: aut_kpi_ativas
648| } %}
649| {% include 'components/ui/_card.html.twig' with {
650| title: 'Autorizações Inativas',
651| value: aut_kpi_inativas
652| } %}
653| {% include 'components/ui/_card.html.twig' with {
654| title: 'Colaboradores com Autorizações',
655| value: aut_kpi_colaboradores
656| } %}
657| </div>
658|
659| <div id="aut-view-cards" class="aut-criar-cards-grid d-none">
660| {% for aut in aut_all %}
661| <div class="aut-card-col"
662| data-aut-id="{{ aut.id }}"
663| data-aut-title="{{ aut.titulo|default('')|lower|e('html_attr') }}"
664| data-aut-status="{{ aut.status_real|default('')|e('html_attr') }}"
665| data-aut-reqs="{{ aut.requisitos|default([])|join('|')|lower|e('html_attr') }}">
666| {% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_authorization_card.html.twig' with {
667| aut: aut,
668| ssmaCanCreateAuthorization: ssmaCanCreateAuthorization|default(false)
669| } %}
670| </div>
671| {% endfor %}
672| </div>
673|
674| </div>{# /.aut-criar-cards-stack #}
675|
676| {% endif %}
677|
678| {% if aut_all|length > 0 %}
679|
680| {# ── Table view (padrão Figma) ── #}
681| <div id="aut-view-table" class="aut-criar-table-wrap">
682| {% set autValidadeHeader %}
683| Validade
684| <i class="far fa-info-circle governance-auth-table-validade-info"
685| title="A validade da autorização é determinada pelo requisito com o vencimento mais próximo. Sempre que um requisito vencer, a autorização poderá exigir atualização ou regularização para continuar em conformidade."
686| aria-hidden="true"></i>
687| {% endset %}
688|
689| {% set autTableHeaders = [
690| {'title': 'Título da autorização', 'responsivePriority': 1},
691| {'title': 'Requisitos', 'responsivePriority': 3},
692| {'title': autValidadeHeader|trim, 'class': 'text-center', 'responsivePriority': 4},
693| {'title': 'Status', 'class': 'text-center', 'responsivePriority': 2},
694| {'title': 'Responsável', 'responsivePriority': 5},
695| {'title': 'Ações', 'class': 'text-center', 'responsivePriority': 1}
696| ] %}
697|
698| {% set autTableRows = [] %}
699| {% for aut in aut_all %}
700| {% set isAtivaTbl = aut.status_real|default('') == 'ativa' %}
701| {% set validadeTbl = aut.validade_exibicao|default('Indefinida') %}
702| {% set reqsTbl = aut.requisitos|default([]) %}
703| {% set responsavelTbl = aut.responsavel|default(null) %}
704| {% set responsavelNomeTbl = responsavelTbl.name|default('')|trim %}
705| {% set responsavelAvatarTbl = responsavelTbl.avatar|default('')|trim %}
706|
707| {% set autTitleCell %}
708| <span class="governance-auth-table-title">{{ aut.titulo }}</span>
709| {% endset %}
710|
711| {% set autStatusCell %}
712| <span class="mhs-pill mhs-pill--sm mhs-pill--{{ isAtivaTbl ? 'green' : 'gray' }} governance-auth-status-pill">
713| <span class="mhs-pill-label">{{ isAtivaTbl ? 'Ativa' : 'Inativa' }}</span>
714| </span>
715| {% endset %}
716|
717| {% set autReqsCell %}
718| {% if reqsTbl|length > 0 %}
719| <div class="governance-auth-card__tags" style="margin:0;">
720| {% for req in reqsTbl|slice(0, 2) %}
721| <span class="mhs-pill mhs-pill--sm mhs-pill--teal governance-auth-card__tag" title="{{ req|e('html_attr') }}">
722| <span class="mhs-pill-label">{{ req }}</span>
723| </span>
724| {% endfor %}
725| {% if reqsTbl|length > 2 %}
726| <span class="mhs-pill mhs-pill--sm mhs-pill--teal governance-auth-card__tag governance-auth-card__tag--more"
727| title="{{ reqsTbl|slice(2)|join(', ')|e('html_attr') }}">
728| <span class="mhs-pill-label">+{{ reqsTbl|length - 2 }}</span>
729| </span>
730| {% endif %}
731| </div>
732| {% else %}
733| <span class="text-muted">—</span>
734| {% endif %}
735| {% endset %}
736|
737| {% set autResponsibleCell %}
738| {% if responsavelNomeTbl %}
739| <span class="governance-auth-table-responsible" title="{{ responsavelNomeTbl|e('html_attr') }}">
740| <span class="governance-auth-table-responsible__avatar">
741| {% if responsavelAvatarTbl %}
742| <img src="{{ asset('uploads/photos/' ~ responsavelAvatarTbl) }}"
743| alt=""
744| role="presentation"
745| style="width:100%;height:100%;object-fit:cover;border-radius:999px;"
746| onerror="this.style.display='none';this.nextElementSibling.style.display='inline-flex';">
747| <span style="display:none;">{{ responsavelNomeTbl|first|upper }}</span>
748| {% else %}
749| {{ responsavelNomeTbl|first|upper }}
750| {% endif %}
751| </span>
752| <span class="governance-auth-table-responsible__name">{{ responsavelNomeTbl }}</span>
753| </span>
754| {% else %}
755| <span class="text-muted">—</span>
756| {% endif %}
757| {% endset %}
758|
759| {% set autActionsCell = [
760| {
761| type: 'button',
762| icon: 'fa-regular fa-eye',
763| class: 'btn-default btn-sm ssma-aqc-table-action-btn js-aut-criar-visualizar',
764| url: '#',
765| attributes: {
766| 'data-aut-id': aut.id,
767| 'data-toggle': 'tooltip',
768| 'data-container': 'body',
769| 'data-boundary': 'viewport',
770| 'title': 'Visualizar autorização'
771| }
772| }
773| ] %}
774| {% if ssmaCanCreateAuthorization|default(false) %}
775| {% set autActionsCell = autActionsCell|merge([
776| {
777| type: 'button',
778| icon: 'fa-regular fa-pen',
779| class: 'btn-default btn-sm ssma-aqc-table-action-btn ssma-aqc-edit-btn js-aut-criar-editar',
780| url: '#',
781| attributes: {
782| 'data-aut-id': aut.id,
783| 'data-aut': aut|json_encode|e('html_attr'),
784| 'data-toggle': 'tooltip',
785| 'data-container': 'body',
786| 'data-boundary': 'viewport',
787| 'title': 'Editar autorização'
788| }
789| },
790| {
791| type: 'dropdown',
792| items: [
793| {
794| label: isAtivaTbl ? 'Inativar autorização' : 'Reativar autorização',
795| icon: 'fas fa-tag mr-2',
796| class: 'js-aut-criar-toggle-status',
797| url: '#',
798| attributes: {
799| 'data-aut-id': aut.id,
800| 'data-aut-active': isAtivaTbl ? '1' : '0'
801| }
802| },
803| {
804| label: 'Deletar autorização',
805| icon: 'fas fa-trash-alt mr-2',
806| class: 'text-danger js-aut-criar-remover',
807| url: '#',
808| attributes: {
809| 'data-aut-id': aut.id,
810| 'data-aut-titulo': aut.titulo|e('html_attr'),
811| 'data-aut-status': aut.status_real|default('')|e('html_attr')
812| }
813| }
814| ]
815| }
816| ]) %}
817| {% endif %}
818|
819| {% set autTableRows = autTableRows|merge([{
820| 'id': aut.id,
821| 'titulo': autTitleCell|trim,
822| 'requisitos': autReqsCell|trim,
823| 'validade': validadeTbl,
824| 'status': autStatusCell|trim,
825| 'responsavel': autResponsibleCell|trim,
826| 'Ações': autActionsCell,
827| '_aut-status': aut.status_real|default('')|e('html_attr'),
828| '_aut-reqs': aut.requisitos|default([])|join('|')|lower|e('html_attr')
829| }]) %}
830| {% endfor %}
Request #22
deepseek-v4-flash
P:108.18K C:299 CR:104.83K CW:0
3964ms
Reasoning
Let me check the whole permission context. Let me look at where ssmaCanCreateAuthorization is defined and whether the tab `_tab_authorizations_create` is shown when the user can't create. Actually the whole tab could be named "Criar" but shows the list of authorizations too. But question 3 says the View button now appears for those who couldn't previously see it. But previously autActionsCell was empty for them — meaning no actions at all. So the change is intentional to give a "visualizar" to people who can access the page/list but not create.
But we need to determine whether the page itself is only accessible to users who can create. Let's search for how the tabs are gated (in index.html.twig) - the tab "Autorizações" (create tab) might be gated by ssmaCanCreateAuthorization or not. Let me check index.html.twig around where tabs are defined. Let me look at the full file to see permission gating for tabs and which roles.
Let me read index.html.twig to check which tab areas each permission controls, plus how defaultAutTab is computed, and the visualizar event handler.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig"}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig (Total lines: 208)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-208
1|{% extends user_uses_admin_hub_shell() ? 'layoutAdmin.html.twig' : 'layoutUser.html.twig' %}
2|
3|{% block headercss %}
4| {{ parent() }}
5| <link rel="stylesheet" href="{{ asset('css/governance/governance-authorization.css') }}?v=202606120">
6| <link rel="stylesheet" href="{{ asset('css/governance/governance-hub-layout.css') }}?v=202606121">
7| <link rel="stylesheet" href="{{ asset('css/metahuman-standard/components/_modal_offcanvas.css') }}">
8| <link rel="stylesheet" href="{{ asset('css/ssma/detail-offcanvas-readonly.css') }}?v=202605283">
9| <link rel="stylesheet" href="{{ asset('css/governance/governance-authorization-detail-offcanvas.css') }}?v=202606110">
10| <link rel="stylesheet" href="{{ asset('css/governance/governance-modal-form.css') }}?v=202606113">
11|{% endblock %}
12|
13|{% block container %}
14|<section class="members-content zero-padding modern-layout hub-module-layout ssma-module ssma-autorizacoes-index governance-authorization-page governance-hub-page">
15| {% include 'ssma/partials/_shared_module_assets.html.twig' with {
16| allMembers: allMembers|default([]),
17| ssmaIncludeBodyMapAssets: false
18| } %}
19|
20| {% set autorizacaoTabs = [] %}
21| {% if ssmaCanCreateAuthorization|default(false) %}
22| {% set autorizacaoTabs = autorizacaoTabs|merge([
23| {'id': 'tab_auth_criar', 'label': 'Criação de Autorizações', 'target_div': 'tab_auth_criar_content'}
24| ]) %}
25| {% endif %}
26| {% if ssmaCanManageConfig|default(false) %}
27| {% set autorizacaoTabs = autorizacaoTabs|merge([
28| {'id': 'tab_auth_requisitos', 'label': 'Criação de Requisitos', 'target_div': 'tab_auth_requisitos_content'},
29| {'id': 'tab_auth_configuracoes', 'label': 'Configurações', 'target_div': 'tab_auth_configuracoes_content'}
30| ]) %}
31| {% endif %}
32| {% if ssmaCanManagePermissions|default(false) %}
33| {% set autorizacaoTabs = autorizacaoTabs|merge([
34| {'id': 'tab_auth_permissao', 'label': 'Permissões', 'target_div': 'tab_auth_permissao_content'}
35| ]) %}
36| {% endif %}
37|
38| {% set defaultAutTab = autorizacaoTabs|length > 0 ? (autorizacaoTabs|first).id : 'tab_auth_criar' %}
39|
40| <div class="modern-header{% if autorizacaoTabs|length <= 1 %} no-tabs{% endif %}">
41| <div class="header-top">
42| <h1 class="header-title">Autorizações & Requisitos</h1>
43| </div>
44|
45| {% if autorizacaoTabs|length > 1 %}
46| {% include 'components/ui/_tabs.html.twig' with {
47| tabs_id: 'autorizacao_tabs',
48| use_existing_divs: true,
49| default_tab: defaultAutTab,
50| tabs: autorizacaoTabs
51| } %}
52| {% endif %}
53| </div>
54|
55| {% if ssmaCanCreateAuthorization|default(false) %}
56| <div id="tab_auth_criar_content"
57| class="tab-panel"
58| style="display:{% if defaultAutTab == 'tab_auth_criar' %}block{% else %}none{% endif %};">
59| {% include 'governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig' %}
60| </div>
61| {% endif %}
62|
63| {% if ssmaCanManageConfig|default(false) %}
64| <div id="tab_auth_requisitos_content"
65| class="tab-panel"
66| style="display:{% if defaultAutTab == 'tab_auth_requisitos' %}block{% else %}none{% endif %};">
67| {% include 'governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_config.html.twig' %}
68| </div>
69|
70| <div id="tab_auth_configuracoes_content"
71| class="tab-panel"
72| style="display:{% if defaultAutTab == 'tab_auth_configuracoes' %}block{% else %}none{% endif %};">
73| {% include 'governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig' %}
74| </div>
75| {% endif %}
76|
77| {% if ssmaCanManagePermissions|default(false) %}
78| <div id="tab_auth_permissao_content"
79| class="tab-panel governance-authorization-permissions-tab"
80| style="display:{% if defaultAutTab == 'tab_auth_permissao' %}block{% else %}none{% endif %};">
81| {% include 'ssma/partials/_tab_permissions.html.twig' with {
82| ssmaPermissionProduct: 'ssma-authorization',
83| ssmaPermissionTabId: 'gov_auth_permissions'
84| } %}
85| </div>
86| {% endif %}
87|</section>
88|{% include 'components/_modal_confirm_multiple.html.twig' %}
89|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_deactivate.html.twig' %}
90|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_reactivate.html.twig' %}
91|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_in_use.html.twig' %}
92|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_delete.html.twig' %}
93|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_delete_blocked.html.twig' %}
94|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_delete.html.twig' %}
95|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_in_use.html.twig' %}
96|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_delete_blocked.html.twig' %}
97|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_deactivate.html.twig' %}
98|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_reactivate.html.twig' %}
99|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_form.html.twig' %}
100|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_offcanvas_requirement_detail.html.twig' %}
101|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_offcanvas_authorization_detail.html.twig' %}
102|{% include 'ssma/partials/_modal_delete_confirm.html.twig' %}
103|{% endblock %}
104|
105|{% block javascripts %}
106| {% include 'governance/partials/_hub_component_assets.html.twig' %}
107| {{ parent() }}
108| <script src="{{ asset('js/metahuman-standard/components/_modal_offcanvas.js') }}"></script>
109| <script>
110| (function () {
111| function hoistGovAuthDetailOffcanvasToBody() {
112| var wrapper = document.getElementById('govAuthDetail-offcanvas-wrapper');
113| var offcanvasModal = document.getElementById('govAuthDetail');
114| if (wrapper && wrapper.parentNode !== document.body) {
115| document.body.appendChild(wrapper);
116| }
117| if (offcanvasModal && offcanvasModal.parentNode !== document.body) {
118| document.body.appendChild(offcanvasModal);
119| }
120|
121| var condWrapper = document.getElementById('govAuthCondDetail-offcanvas-wrapper');
122| var condOffcanvasModal = document.getElementById('govAuthCondDetail');
123| if (condWrapper && condWrapper.parentNode !== document.body) {
124| document.body.appendChild(condWrapper);
125| }
126| if (condOffcanvasModal && condOffcanvasModal.parentNode !== document.body) {
127| document.body.appendChild(condOffcanvasModal);
128| }
129| }
130|
131| function hoistGovAuthCondModalToBody() {
132| [
133| 'modalAdicionarAut',
134| 'governanceAuthCondModal',
135| 'govAuthCondDeleteModal',
136| 'govAuthCondDeleteBlockedModal',
137| 'govAuthCondInUseModal',
138| 'govAuthCondDeactivateModal',
139| 'govAuthCondReactivateModal',
140| 'autAuthorizationDeleteModal',
141| 'autAuthorizationDeleteBlockedModal',
142| 'govAuthAddApproverModal'
143| ].forEach(function (id) {
144| var el = document.getElementById(id);
145| if (el && el.parentNode !== document.body) {
146| document.body.appendChild(el);
147| }
148| });
149| }
150|
151| window.hoistGovAuthDetailOffcanvasToBody = hoistGovAuthDetailOffcanvasToBody;
152|
153| function sanitizeOffcanvasFnSuffix(modalId) {
154| return String(modalId || '').replace(/[-_]/g, '');
155| }
156|
157| function closeGovAuthOffcanvasById(modalId) {
158| var closeFn = window['closeOffcanvas' + sanitizeOffcanvasFnSuffix(modalId)];
159| if (typeof closeFn === 'function') {
160| closeFn();
161| return;
162| }
163| var $wrapper = $('#' + modalId + '-offcanvas-wrapper');
164| $wrapper.removeClass('show');
165| $('.app-page-body').first().removeClass('offcanvas-active');
166| $('#' + modalId).modal('hide');
167| }
168|
169| function bindGovAuthOffcanvasDismissOutside(wrapperId, modalId) {
170| $(document).on('click.govAuthOffcanvas_' + modalId, function (e) {
171| var $wrapper = $('#' + wrapperId + '.show');
172| if (!$wrapper.length) {
173| return;
174| }
175| if ($(e.target).closest('[data-dismiss-offcanvas], .offcanvas-panel, .modal.show, .custom-modern-select.open, .custom-modern-options').length) {
176| return;
177| }
178| if (!$(e.target).closest('#' + wrapperId).length) {
179| return;
180| }
181| if (modalId === 'govAuthCondDetail' && typeof window.closeGovAuthCondDetailOffcanvas === 'function') {
182| window.closeGovAuthCondDetailOffcanvas();
183| return;
184| }
185| closeGovAuthOffcanvasById(modalId);
186| });
187| }
188|
189| hoistGovAuthDetailOffcanvasToBody();
190| hoistGovAuthCondModalToBody();
191|
192| $(function () {
193| $('#modalAdicionarAut, #governanceAuthCondModal').attr({
194| 'data-backdrop': 'true',
195| 'data-keyboard': 'true'
196| });
197|
198| if (typeof setupModalOffcanvas === 'function') {
199| setupModalOffcanvas();
200| }
201|
202| bindGovAuthOffcanvasDismissOutside('govAuthDetail-offcanvas-wrapper', 'govAuthDetail');
203| bindGovAuthOffcanvasDismissOutside('govAuthCondDetail-offcanvas-wrapper', 'govAuthCondDetail');
204| });
205| })();
206| </script>
207|{% endblock %}
208|
Request #23
deepseek-v4-flash
P:111.33K C:389 CR:108.42K CW:0
3981ms
Reasoning
Important! The whole "Criação de Autorizações" tab (`_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig`) is only rendered when `ssmaCanCreateAuthorization` is true. So users who see this tab and its list can create authorizations. That means the diff change in `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig` moving the "visualizar" action out of the `{% if ssmaCanCreateAuthorization %}` block is essentially cosmetic: since the whole file is only included if ssmaCanCreateAuthorization is true, the visualizar button appears in the same condition context as before. Actually wait — is `_tab_authorizations_create` included elsewhere? Only in index.html.twig at line 59 within `{% if ssmaCanCreateAuthorization %}`. So the change moving the eye button out of the create-permission conditional has NO practical effect in the current inclusion context. So issue #3 is moot / low concern. It might be a dead change. But note there might be another include somewhere else. Let's confirm via search. Earlier code_search for `_modal_authorization_form` found include only in create tab. And create tab is included in index. Let me search includes of `_tab_authorizations_create`.
Given only included under ssmaCanCreateAuthorization, the #3 concern is not impactful; I will skip or mention low priority? We can skip to avoid noise. Actually let's quickly search includes to be thorough.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "_tab_authorizations_create"}
Result
File: docs/engineering/pr/new_staging2/PR_arquivos_new_staging2.txt
Match lines: 1
1537|M templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig
File: docs/engineering/pr/new_staging2/PR_impacto_new_staging2.txt
Match lines: 1
1537| .../tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig | 1569 +++--
File: docs/governance/GOVERNANCE_MODULE_OVERVIEW.md
Match lines: 2
67|Arquivo: `templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig`
193|- `templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig`
File: docs/logs/engineering/frontend_console_inventory.md
Match lines: 1
933|| templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig | templates | nao | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
File: docs/ssma/MERGE_NEW_STAGING2_PARA_SSMA.md
Match lines: 1
70|| `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig` | Versão `ssma` (partials de empty state) |
File: templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig
Match lines: 1
59| {% include 'governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig' %}
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "js-aut-criar-visualizar"}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_authorization_card.html.twig
Match lines: 1
33| class="dropdown-item js-aut-criar-visualizar"
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig
Match lines: 2
763| class: 'btn-default btn-sm ssma-aqc-table-action-btn js-aut-criar-visualizar',
1941| $(document).on('click', '.js-aut-criar-visualizar', function (e) {
Request #24
deepseek-v4-flash
P:112.21K C:283 CR:111.62K CW:0
3418ms
Reasoning
Since `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig` is only included under `ssmaCanCreateAuthorization`, moving the visualizar button outside the condition has no practical permission effect. I'll not include issue #3, or at most a small note. Let me not over-comment; it is fine to skip.
Let me focus on the JS handlers in the create tab for how data is fetched into modal and the save flow. Let me read the relevant sections of the create tab: around line 1941 (visualizar click handler) and the AJAX calls.
Let me look at the click handler for js-aut-criar-editar to understand data population (they use `data-aut` attribute maybe includes json of new fields? The json_encode of aut from list data). Let me read lines 1850-2120 and around 1630-1750.
Let me read file segments.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig", "start_line": 1620, "end_line": 2120}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig (Total lines: 2423)
IS_TRUNCATED: true
LINE_RANGE: 1620-2119
1620|
1621| if (document.readyState === 'loading') {
1622| $(document).ready(bootAutCriarTab);
1623| } else {
1624| bootAutCriarTab();
1625| }
1626|
1627| $(document).on('shown.bs.modal', '#modalAdicionarAut', function () {
1628| var modalEl = document.getElementById('modalAdicionarAut');
1629| if (modalEl && modalEl.parentNode !== document.body) {
1630| document.body.appendChild(modalEl);
1631| }
1632| initAutCriarReqTagSelect();
1633| initAutCriarContractorReqTagSelect();
1634| if (pendingAutCriarFill) {
1635| applyAutCriarModalFields(pendingAutCriarFill);
1636| pendingAutCriarFill = null;
1637| }
1638| if (typeof window.initAllCustomSelectWrappers === 'function') {
1639| window.initAllCustomSelectWrappers();
1640| }
1641| syncAutCriarCustomSelectOptions($('#autCriarRequisitoAdd'));
1642| syncAutCriarCustomSelectOptions($('#autCriarContractorReqAdd'));
1643| if (!getAutCriarRequisitosFromTags().length) {
1644| resetAutCriarCustomSelect('autCriarRequisitoAdd', '');
1645| updateAutCriarTagSelectCountLabel(AUT_REQ_TAG_CONFIG);
1646| }
1647| if (!getAutCriarContractorReqsFromTags().length) {
1648| resetAutCriarCustomSelect('autCriarContractorReqAdd', '');
1649| updateAutCriarTagSelectCountLabel(AUT_CONTRACTOR_REQ_TAG_CONFIG);
1650| }
1651| AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS.forEach(function (selectId) {
1652| var currentVal = $('#' + selectId).val();
1653| if (currentVal) {
1654| setAutCriarSelectValue(selectId, currentVal);
1655| }
1656| });
1657| });
1658|
1659| function resolveAutCriarResponsavelId(aut) {
1660| aut = aut || {};
1661| if (aut.responsavel_id) {
1662| return aut.responsavel_id;
1663| }
1664| if (aut.responsavel && aut.responsavel.id) {
1665| return aut.responsavel.id;
1666| }
1667| if (Array.isArray(aut.colaboradores) && aut.colaboradores[0] && aut.colaboradores[0].id) {
1668| return aut.colaboradores[0].id;
1669| }
1670| return '';
1671| }
1672|
1673| function resolveAutCriarPayload($btn) {
1674| var autId = parseInt(String(
1675| $btn.attr('data-aut-id')
1676| || $btn.closest('[data-aut-id]').attr('data-aut-id')
1677| || ''
1678| ), 10);
1679| if (autId && AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG[String(autId)]) {
1680| return $.extend(true, {}, AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG[String(autId)]);
1681| }
1682|
1683| var raw = String($btn.attr('data-aut') || '').trim();
1684| if (!raw) {
1685| return {};
1686| }
1687| try {
1688| return JSON.parse(raw);
1689| } catch (e) {
1690| return {};
1691| }
1692| }
1693|
1694| function ensureAutCriarSelectOption(selectId, value, text) {
1695| var $select = $('#' + selectId);
1696| var str = String(value || '').trim();
1697| if (!$select.length || !str) {
1698| return;
1699| }
1700| var exists = $select.find('option').filter(function () {
1701| return String($(this).val()) === str;
1702| }).length > 0;
1703| if (exists) {
1704| return;
1705| }
1706| var label = String(text || str).trim() || str;
1707| $select.append($('<option>', { value: str, text: label }));
1708| var $optionsBox = $select.closest('.custom-modern-select-wrapper').find('.custom-modern-options');
1709| if ($optionsBox.length) {
1710| $optionsBox.append($('<div>', {
1711| 'class': 'custom-modern-option',
1712| 'data-value': str,
1713| text: label
1714| }));
1715| }
1716| }
1717|
1718| function applyAutCriarModalFields(aut) {
1719| aut = aut || {};
1720| var areaId = aut.area_id || aut.area_responsavel_id || (aut.area && aut.area.id) || '';
1721| var aprovadorId = aut.aprovador_id || (aut.aprovador && aut.aprovador.id) || '';
1722| var aprovadorRoleId = aut.aprovador_role_id || (aut.aprovador_role && aut.aprovador_role.id) || '';
1723| var tipo = aut.tipo || aut.tipo_autorizacao || '';
1724| $('#autCriarEdicaoId').val(aut.id || '');
1725| $('#autCriarTitulo').val(aut.titulo || '');
1726| $('#autCriarDescricao').val(aut.descricao || aut.descricao_exibicao || '');
1727| $('#autCriarStatusPreserve').val(aut.status_real === 'inativa' ? 'inativa' : 'ativa');
1728| setAutCriarReqTags(Array.isArray(aut.requisitos) ? aut.requisitos.slice() : []);
1729| setAutCriarContractorReqTags(Array.isArray(aut.contractor_requirement_dependencies) ? aut.contractor_requirement_dependencies.slice() : []);
1730| setAutCriarSelectValue('autCriarResponsavel', resolveAutCriarResponsavelId(aut));
1731| ensureAutCriarSelectOption('autCriarArea', areaId, aut.area_name || (aut.area && aut.area.name) || '');
1732| setAutCriarSelectValue('autCriarArea', areaId);
1733| ensureAutCriarSelectOption('autCriarTipo', tipo, tipo);
1734| setAutCriarSelectValue('autCriarTipo', tipo);
1735| ensureAutCriarSelectOption(
1736| 'autCriarAprovador',
1737| aprovadorId,
1738| (aut.aprovador && aut.aprovador.name) || ''
1739| );
1740| setAutCriarSelectValue('autCriarAprovador', aprovadorId);
1741| ensureAutCriarSelectOption(
1742| 'autCriarAprovadorRole',
1743| aprovadorRoleId,
1744| (aut.aprovador_role && aut.aprovador_role.name) || ''
1745| );
1746| setAutCriarSelectValue('autCriarAprovadorRole', aprovadorRoleId);
1747| }
1748|
1749| function setAutCriarSelectValue(selectId, val) {
1750| var normalized = String(val || '');
1751| if (!normalized) {
1752| resetAutCriarCustomSelect(selectId, '');
1753| return;
1754| }
1755| setAutCriarCustomSelectValueSilent(selectId, normalized);
1756| }
1757|
1758| function setAutCriarResponsavelValue(val) {
1759| setAutCriarSelectValue('autCriarResponsavel', val);
1760| }
1761|
1762| function readAutCriarSelectValue(selectId) {
1763| syncAutCriarSelectFromCustomUi(selectId);
1764| return String($('#' + selectId).val() || '').trim();
1765| }
1766|
1767| function readAutCriarSelectId(selectId) {
1768| return parseInt(readAutCriarSelectValue(selectId), 10) || 0;
1769| }
1770|
1771| function readAutCriarResponsavelFromForm() {
1772| return readAutCriarSelectId('autCriarResponsavel');
1773| }
1774|
1775| function markAutCriarSelectInvalid(selectId) {
1776| var $sel = $('#' + selectId);
1777| var $trigger = $sel.closest('.aut-criar-modal-select-wrap').find('.custom-modern-select-trigger');
1778| if (MV) {
1779| MV.markInvalid($sel);
1780| MV.markInvalid($trigger);
1781| } else {
1782| $sel.addClass('is-invalid');
1783| $trigger.addClass('is-invalid');
1784| }
1785| }
1786|
1787| function setAutCriarModalReadonly(readonly) {
1788| $('#autCriarTitulo, #autCriarDescricao').prop('readonly', readonly);
1789| $('#autCriarRequisitoAdd, #autCriarContractorReqAdd, #autCriarResponsavel, #autCriarArea, #autCriarAprovador, #autCriarAprovadorRole, #autCriarTipo').prop('disabled', readonly);
1790| $('#modalAdicionarAut .aut-criar-modal-select-wrap').css('pointer-events', readonly ? 'none' : '');
1791| $('#autCriarRequisitosTags .occ-tag-remove').toggle(!readonly);
1792| $('#autCriarContractorReqTags .occ-tag-remove').toggle(!readonly);
1793| $('#btnSalvarAdicionarAut').toggle(!readonly);
1794| }
1795|
1796| function populateAutCriarModal(aut, mode, options) {
1797| options = options || {};
1798| resetModal();
1799| var isView = mode === 'view';
1800| setAutCriarModalReadonly(isView);
1801| pendingAutCriarFill = aut;
1802|
1803| if (isView) {
1804| $('#modalAdicionarAutTitulo').text('Visualizar Autorização');
1805| } else if (options.extendMode) {
1806| $('#modalAdicionarAutTitulo').text('Estender autorização');
1807| $('#autCriarBtnLabel').text('Salvar');
1808| } else {
1809| $('#modalAdicionarAutTitulo').text('Editar Autorização');
1810| $('#autCriarBtnLabel').text('Salvar');
1811| }
1812| $('#modalAdicionarAut').modal('show');
1813| }
1814|
1815| function resetModal() {
1816| $('#autCriarEdicaoId').val('');
1817| $('#autCriarTitulo').val('');
1818| $('#autCriarDescricao').val('');
1819| $('#autCriarStatusPreserve').val('ativa');
1820| resetAutCriarReqTags();
1821| resetAutCriarContractorReqTags();
1822| AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS.forEach(function (selectId) {
1823| setAutCriarSelectValue(selectId, '');
1824| });
1825| $('#modalAdicionarAutTitulo').text('Criar Autorização');
1826| $('#autCriarBtnLabel').text('Criar autorização');
1827| setAutCriarModalReadonly(false);
1828| if (MV) { MV.clearState(SCOPE); }
1829| else {
1830| $('#autCriarTitulo, #autCriarDescricao, #autCriarRequisitoAdd, #autCriarRequisitosTags, #autCriarContractorReqAdd, #autCriarContractorReqTags, #autCriarResponsavel, #autCriarArea, #autCriarAprovador, #autCriarAprovadorRole, #autCriarTipo').removeClass('is-invalid');
1831| $('#modalAdicionarAut .aut-criar-modal-select-wrap .custom-modern-select-trigger').removeClass('is-invalid');
1832| }
1833| }
1834|
1835| function setLoading(state) {
1836| var $btn = $('#btnSalvarAdicionarAut');
1837| var $sp = $('#autCriarSpinner');
1838| var $lbl = $('#autCriarBtnLabel');
1839| var $can = $('#modalAdicionarAut .mhs-btn-cancel');
1840| $btn.prop('disabled', state);
1841| $can.prop('disabled', state);
1842| if (state) { $sp.removeClass('d-none'); $lbl.text('Salvando…'); }
1843| else { $sp.addClass('d-none'); $lbl.text($('#autCriarEdicaoId').val() ? 'Salvar' : 'Criar autorização'); }
1844| }
1845|
1846| function reloadPage() {
1847| var tab = (typeof window.__autPostSaveTab === 'string' && window.__autPostSaveTab !== '')
1848| ? window.__autPostSaveTab
1849| : 'tab_auth_criar';
1850| window.__autPostSaveTab = null;
1851| window.location.hash = tab;
1852| window.location.reload();
1853| }
1854|
1855| function setGovAuthDetailLoading() {
1856| $('#govAuthDetailLoading').show();
1857| $('#govAuthDetailError').hide();
1858| $('#govAuthDetailBodyHost').hide().empty();
1859| $('#govAuthDetail-offcanvas-wrapper .offcanvas-body .gov-auth-detail-offcanvas').remove();
1860| $('#govAuthDetailTitle').text('Detalhes da Autorização');
1861| $('#govAuthDetailDeactivateBtn').hide().data('aut-id', '');
1862| $('#govAuthDetailReactivateBtn').hide().data('aut-id', '');
1863| }
1864|
1865| function setGovAuthDetailError(message) {
1866| $('#govAuthDetailLoading').hide();
1867| $('#govAuthDetailBodyHost').hide();
1868| $('#govAuthDetailErrorMessage').text(message || 'Não foi possível carregar os detalhes.');
1869| $('#govAuthDetailError').show();
1870| }
1871|
1872| function setGovAuthDetailContent(html, response) {
1873| $('#govAuthDetailLoading').hide();
1874| $('#govAuthDetailError').hide();
1875| $('#govAuthDetailBodyHost').html(html || '').show();
1876|
1877| if (response && response.title) {
1878| $('#govAuthDetailTitle').text(response.title);
1879| }
1880|
1881| var autId = response && response.aut_id ? response.aut_id : null;
1882| var statusReal = response && response.status_real ? String(response.status_real) : '';
1883| var canManage = !!(response && response.can_manage);
1884|
1885| $('#govAuthDetailDeactivateBtn').hide().data('aut-id', '');
1886| $('#govAuthDetailReactivateBtn').hide().data('aut-id', '');
1887|
1888| if (canManage && autId) {
1889| if (statusReal === 'ativa') {
1890| $('#govAuthDetailDeactivateBtn').show().attr('data-aut-id', autId);
1891| } else if (statusReal === 'inativa') {
1892| $('#govAuthDetailReactivateBtn').show().attr('data-aut-id', autId);
1893| }
1894| }
1895| }
1896|
1897| function loadGovAuthDetail(autId) {
1898| autId = parseInt(autId, 10);
1899| if (!autId) {
1900| if (typeof showToast === 'function') {
1901| showToast('Autorização inválida.', 'Erro', 'fas fa-times', 'bg-danger');
1902| } else if (typeof window.alert === 'function') {
1903| window.alert('Autorização inválida.');
1904| }
1905| return;
1906| }
1907|
1908| govAuthDetailAutId = autId;
1909| setGovAuthDetailLoading();
1910| openGovAuthDetailOffcanvas();
1911|
1912| $.ajax({
1913| url: DETAIL_URL_TPL.replace('999999999', autId),
1914| method: 'GET',
1915| dataType: 'json'
1916| }).done(function (response) {
1917| if (!response || !response.success) {
1918| setGovAuthDetailError((response && response.message) || 'Não foi possível carregar os detalhes.');
1919| return;
1920| }
1921| setGovAuthDetailContent(response.html || '', response);
1922| }).fail(function (xhr) {
1923| var message = 'Não foi possível carregar os detalhes.';
1924| try {
1925| if (xhr.responseJSON && xhr.responseJSON.message) {
1926| message = xhr.responseJSON.message;
1927| }
1928| } catch (e) {}
1929| setGovAuthDetailError(message);
1930| });
1931| }
1932|
1933| /* ── Abrir modal (novo) ── */
1934| $(document).on('click', '#btnAbrirModalAdicionarAut, .js-aut-criar-open-modal', function () {
1935| pendingAutCriarFill = null;
1936| resetModal();
1937| $('#modalAdicionarAut').modal('show');
1938| });
1939|
1940| /* ── Visualizar (offcanvas) ── */
1941| $(document).on('click', '.js-aut-criar-visualizar', function (e) {
1942| e.preventDefault();
1943| e.stopPropagation();
1944| window.__autPostSaveTab = null;
1945| loadGovAuthDetail(readAutCriarAutId($(this)));
1946| });
1947|
1948| $(document).on('click', '#govAuthDetailRetryBtn', function (e) {
1949| e.preventDefault();
1950| loadGovAuthDetail(govAuthDetailAutId);
1951| });
1952|
1953| $(document).on('click', '#govAuthDetailDeactivateBtn', function (e) {
1954| e.preventDefault();
1955| var autId = readAutCriarAutId($(this));
1956| if (!autId) {
1957| return;
1958| }
1959| if (typeof closeOffcanvasgovAuthDetail === 'function') {
1960| closeOffcanvasgovAuthDetail();
1961| }
1962| resetAutAuthorizationDeactivateModal();
1963| $('#autAuthorizationDeactivateModal').data('aut-id', autId).modal('show');
1964| });
1965|
1966| $(document).on('click', '#govAuthDetailReactivateBtn', function (e) {
1967| e.preventDefault();
1968| var autId = readAutCriarAutId($(this));
1969| if (!autId) {
1970| return;
1971| }
1972| if (typeof closeOffcanvasgovAuthDetail === 'function') {
1973| closeOffcanvasgovAuthDetail();
1974| }
1975| resetAutAuthorizationReactivateModal();
1976| $('#autAuthorizationReactivateModal').data('aut-id', autId).modal('show');
1977| });
1978|
1979| /* ── Abrir modal (editar) ── */
1980| $(document).on('click', '.js-aut-criar-editar', function (e) {
1981| e.preventDefault();
1982| var $btn = $(this);
1983| if ($btn.hasClass('js-aut-monit-open')) {
1984| window.__autPostSaveTab = 'tab_auth_monitoramento';
1985| } else {
1986| window.__autPostSaveTab = null;
1987| }
1988| var aut = resolveAutCriarPayload($btn);
1989| if (!aut.id) {
1990| if (typeof showToast === 'function') {
1991| showToast('Não foi possível carregar os dados da autorização.', 'Erro', 'fas fa-times', 'bg-danger');
1992| }
1993| return;
1994| }
1995| populateAutCriarModal(aut, 'edit', { extendMode: $btn.hasClass('js-aut-monit-open') });
1996| });
1997|
1998| /* ── Salvar ── */
1999| $(document).on('click', '#btnSalvarAdicionarAut', function () {
2000| flushAutCriarPendingRequisitoSelection();
2001| flushAutCriarPendingContractorReqSelection();
2002| AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS.forEach(syncAutCriarSelectFromCustomUi);
2003|
2004| var titulo = $.trim($('#autCriarTitulo').val());
2005| var descricao = $.trim($('#autCriarDescricao').val());
2006| var id = $('#autCriarEdicaoId').val();
2007| var responsavelId = readAutCriarResponsavelFromForm();
2008| var areaId = readAutCriarSelectId('autCriarArea');
2009| var aprovadorId = readAutCriarSelectId('autCriarAprovador');
2010| var aprovadorRoleId = readAutCriarSelectId('autCriarAprovadorRole');
2011| var tipo = readAutCriarSelectValue('autCriarTipo');
2012|
2013| if (MV) { MV.clearState(SCOPE); }
2014| else {
2015| $('#autCriarTitulo, #autCriarDescricao, #autCriarRequisitoAdd, #autCriarRequisitosTags, #autCriarContractorReqAdd, #autCriarContractorReqTags, #autCriarResponsavel, #autCriarArea, #autCriarAprovador, #autCriarAprovadorRole, #autCriarTipo').removeClass('is-invalid');
2016| $('#modalAdicionarAut .aut-criar-modal-select-wrap .custom-modern-select-trigger').removeClass('is-invalid');
2017| }
2018|
2019| var valid = true;
2020| if (!titulo) {
2021| if (MV) MV.markInvalid($('#autCriarTitulo')); else $('#autCriarTitulo').addClass('is-invalid');
2022| valid = false;
2023| }
2024| if (!areaId) {
2025| markAutCriarSelectInvalid('autCriarArea');
2026| valid = false;
2027| }
2028| if (!responsavelId) {
2029| markAutCriarSelectInvalid('autCriarResponsavel');
2030| valid = false;
2031| }
2032| if (!tipo) {
2033| markAutCriarSelectInvalid('autCriarTipo');
2034| valid = false;
2035| }
2036| var requisitos = getAutCriarRequisitosFromTags();
2037| if (requisitos.length === 0) {
2038| if (MV) {
2039| MV.markInvalid($('#autCriarRequisitoAdd'));
2040| MV.markInvalid($('#autCriarRequisitosTags'));
2041| MV.markInvalid($('#modalAdicionarAut .aut-criar-modal-select-wrap:has(#autCriarRequisitoAdd) .custom-modern-select-trigger'));
2042| } else {
2043| $('#autCriarRequisitoAdd, #autCriarRequisitosTags, #modalAdicionarAut .aut-criar-modal-select-wrap:has(#autCriarRequisitoAdd) .custom-modern-select-trigger').addClass('is-invalid');
2044| }
2045| valid = false;
2046| }
2047| if (!descricao) {
2048| if (MV) MV.markInvalid($('#autCriarDescricao')); else $('#autCriarDescricao').addClass('is-invalid');
2049| valid = false;
2050| }
2051| if (!valid) {
2052| if (MV) MV.showAlert(ALERT, '#modalAdicionarAut .modal-body');
2053| return;
2054| }
2055|
2056| setLoading(true);
2057|
2058| var payload = {
2059| id: id || null,
2060| titulo: titulo,
2061| descricao: descricao,
2062| requisitos: requisitos,
2063| contractor_requirement_dependencies: getAutCriarContractorReqsFromTags(),
2064| responsavel_id: responsavelId,
2065| area_id: areaId,
2066| aprovador_id: aprovadorId || null,
2067| aprovador_role_id: aprovadorRoleId || null,
2068| tipo: tipo
2069| };
2070| if (id) {
2071| payload.status = $('#autCriarStatusPreserve').val() || 'ativa';
2072| }
2073|
2074| $.ajax({
2075| url: SALVAR_URL,
2076| method: 'POST',
2077| contentType: 'application/json; charset=UTF-8',
2078| dataType: 'json',
2079| data: JSON.stringify(payload)
2080| }).done(function (res) {
2081| if (!res || !res.success) {
2082| var msg = (res && res.message) ? res.message : 'Não foi possível salvar.';
2083| if (typeof showToast === 'function') showToast(msg, 'Erro', 'fas fa-times', 'bg-danger');
2084| else alert(msg);
2085| return;
2086| }
2087| $('#modalAdicionarAut').modal('hide');
2088| if (res.aut && res.aut.id != null) {
2089| AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG[String(res.aut.id)] = res.aut;
2090| }
2091| if (typeof showToast === 'function') showToast(res.message || 'Salvo.', 'Sucesso', 'fas fa-check', 'bg-success');
2092| setTimeout(reloadPage, 400);
2093| }).fail(function (xhr) {
2094| var msg = 'Erro ao salvar.';
2095| try { var j = xhr.responseJSON; if (j && j.message) msg = j.message; } catch (e) {}
2096| if (typeof showToast === 'function') showToast(msg, 'Erro', 'fas fa-times', 'bg-danger');
2097| else alert(msg);
2098| }).always(function () {
2099| setLoading(false);
2100| });
2101| });
2102|
2103| /* ── Ativar / inativar ── */
2104| $(document).on('click', '.js-aut-criar-toggle-status', function (e) {
2105| e.preventDefault();
2106| var $btn = $(this);
2107| var autId = $btn.data('aut-id');
2108| var isActive = String($btn.data('aut-active')) === '1';
2109|
2110| if (isActive) {
2111| resetAutAuthorizationDeactivateModal();
2112| $('#autAuthorizationDeactivateModal').data('aut-id', autId).modal('show');
2113| return;
2114| }
2115|
2116| resetAutAuthorizationReactivateModal();
2117| $('#autAuthorizationReactivateModal').data('aut-id', autId).modal('show');
2118| });
2119|
Note: Results truncated to 500 lines. Please narrow your line range.
Request #25
deepseek-v4-flash
P:119.44K C:270 CR:112.38K CW:0
3638ms
Reasoning
This confirms the create-tab now sends payload including area_id, tipo, aprovador_id, aprovador_role_id. Since authorizationSave in GovernanceController doesn't set those, they'd be silently ignored. Also detail views use offcanvas and edit uses the catalog data (with new fields from `aut` row JSON).
Wait — actually, the edit modal data comes from `AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG` or `data-aut` attribute (json_encode of aut row). But rows are built in `loadAuthorizationsData`. The aut row in the list may include area_id etc. But let me not dig too deep.
I want to confirm the backend `authorizationSave` is the endpoint used by SALVAR_URL. Let's find SALVAR_URL definition. Also we have to check detail_url. Search in create tab for SALVAR_URL var.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "SALVAR_URL|DETAIL_URL_TPL", "file_patterns": ["templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig"]}
Result
No matches found
Request #26
deepseek-v4-flash
P:119.72K C:48 CR:119.68K CW:0
1780ms
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "SALVAR_URL"}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig
Match lines: 2
909| var SALVAR_URL = {{ path('governance_authorization_save')|json_encode|raw }};
2075| url: SALVAR_URL,
Request #27
deepseek-v4-flash
P:119.85K C:99 CR:119.68K CW:0
1877ms
Reasoning
Let me check the routes file for governance_authorization_save → which controller it points to.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "governance_authorization_save", "file_patterns": ["config/routes_governance.yaml"]}
Result
File: config/routes_governance.yaml Match lines: 1 230|governance_authorization_save:
Request #28
deepseek-v4-flash
P:119.99K C:86 CR:119.94K CW:0
2000ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "config/routes_governance.yaml", "start_line": 220, "end_line": 245}
Result
File: config/routes_governance.yaml (Total lines: 408)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 220-245
220| requirements:
221| id: '\d+'
222|
223|governance_badge_send:
224| path: /manager/governance/badges/{id}/send
225| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::badgeSendToMember
226| methods: [POST]
227| requirements:
228| id: '\d+'
229|
230|governance_authorization_save:
231| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/save
232| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::authorizationSave
233| methods: [POST]
234|
235|governance_authorization_remove:
236| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/{id}
237| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::authorizationRemove
238| methods: [DELETE]
239| requirements:
240| id: '\d+'
241|
242|governance_authorization_usage:
243| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/{id}/usage
244| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::authorizationUsage
245| methods: [GET]
Request #29
deepseek-v4-flash
P:120.38K C:4.38K CR:120.06K CW:0
35732ms
Reasoning
Confirmed: `governance_authorization_save` → `GovernanceController::authorizationSave` which does not handle area_id/tipo/aprovador_id/aprovador_role_id. So the new fields sent from the create modal are silently dropped. That's a genuine high-severity functional/data-loss issue tied to this PR: The PR states "Resultado esperado: O formulário de criação coleta área, tipo e aprovadores e envia no payload. A listagem/edição lê area_id, tipo..." and specifically flagged "no review, conferir se authorizationSave já grava esses campos nesta entrega".
Since the backend endpoint is outside the review group, I cannot attach a comment to its code. But I can attach the comment to the added payload lines in `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig` (the lines sending area_id etc.). The review instructions permit cross-file observations to be flagged within the review group, e.g., on the payload lines. Yes, we'll attach to those lines.
Actually, wait — maybe there's also an edit flow that reads area_id/tipo from `AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG`, which lists aut rows in loadAuthorizationsData, which might not include those fields (not yet read from DB). Let me confirm toArray was updated to include area_id etc. (it was — repository includes them). Also need aut data rows (list rows in loadAuthorizationsData). Let me check loadAuthorizationsData rows to see if area_id/tipo/aprovador_id/aprovador_role_id included in `aut` per row. That would affect edit modal pre-population. But given edit prepopulation can fall back to defaults (area select from option), the prefill requires row data.
Actually, this deep-dive is optional. The main contract break (modal sends fields that backend drops) is confirmed. Now, this might be because the backend changes are expected to land in the same PR on the target branch (this branch merges the model branch that has entity columns but not necessarily the save wiring). Either way, a reviewer should flag it.
Let me now look at the settings tab autosave bug possibilities and remaining files.
Let me now examine the `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` initial types ordering bug: `addTypeChip` calls `syncAllApproverAreaSelects()` for each initial type before approver rows are hydrated. Then hydrateAssignments adds rows after. But note order: initialTypes forEach(addTypeChip), then hydrateAssignments members/roles, then syncApproverMode, skipSave = false. addTypeChip schedules nothing because skipSave true. OK.
Another potential bug: The settings tab uses `allMembers`, `aut_company_roles` for the picker catalog, and `aut_company_areas` etc. Wait, `aut_company_roles` comes from config hub query? Actually in settings tab initial config comes from twig variables: aut_authorization_types, aut_authorization_approver_members, aut_authorization_approver_roles. And `aut_company_roles` is available as variable in settings page too? Settings tab is included from index, which gets all hub query variables. So yes.
Now, the settings modal: `_modal_add_approver.html.twig` references `allMembers`? Actually modal template itself is static markup; JS in settings tab populates rows. But the tab settings template has its own `<style>` and includes the modal. The modal's table header says "Área de Aplicação" and tbody filled by JS. Fine.
Now examine the settings autosave call: it posts the whole config via `SAVE_URL`. Confirm SAVE_URL route path is correct. And the endpoint savePayload might require CSRF? It doesn't validate CSRF. Should we flag? Yes per user rules - every mutation via AJAX sends csrf token and backend validates. This is a missing CSRF protection issue. But since backend doesn't validate, adding token without backend validation only matters for future, but current no token → CSRF risk. That's real: if manager is logged in and visits a malicious page that POSTs JSON to /manager/governance/authorizations/config, could change config? CSRF generally can't send JSON content-type cross-origin without CORS preflight; the endpoint reads request->getContent() and expects JSON. A simple form POST with `application/x-www-form-urlencoded` wouldn't parse as JSON payload → return 400 invalid payload. So actual CSRF exploitation is limited given JSON requirement and permission gate requiring manager session. But user rules still demand csrf token both sides; the project does that for badge actions. It's worth flagging as medium — security hardening consistency.
Let me also verify the debounce/page exit issue (#5). scheduleSave debounce 400ms. If user navigates away before timer, config lost silently. But minor because user remains editing the page; the real scenario: user makes a change then immediately switches to another tab within page; the DOM still exists; timer runs. On reload or navigate away, changes may be lost. Worth low/medium. Also concurrency between two open browser tabs both saving whole config. Medium concern. I'll write one concise comment on scheduleSave (maybe low/medium) or combine with #5. Actually the review instructions prefer focusing; #5 is medium — one comment.
Wait also check there's no issue with the initial skipSave = true and not saving the initial state — fine.
Potential real bug in settings: `typeInput` Enter creates type chip and triggers `scheduleSave`, but the type may not be persisted until debounce (400ms). If page reloads, lost. But fine.
Now more importantly, there could be an XSS vector via `initialTypes` being rendered into a `<script>` using `|raw`. Since type labels are user-provided, and json_encode by default doesn't escape `/` or `<`, actually json_encode escapes `/` by default? Let me recall: PHP's json_encode escapes slashes by default only with JSON_UNESCAPED_SLASHES not set. Wait default json_encode escapes `/` as `\/`, and does NOT escape `<`, `>`, `&`, `'` unless JSON_HEX_TAG etc. Actually default: `<` stays `<` (since PHP 5.4?). Let me recall. json_encode("<") outputs `"<"`. Yes `<` and `>` are not escaped by default; only control chars, quotes, backslash, and slash (`/` -> `\/`). `</script>` inside a JS string in an inline `<script>` block is a classic XSS vector. In the HTML spec, the sequence `</script>` inside a script element closes the script tag even within a JS string. json_encode escapes `/` to `\/` by default, which prevents `</script>` because `</script>` would become `<\/script>`. Indeed default json_encode turns "/" into "\/", so `</script>` becomes `<\/script>` which is safe in the HTML parser sense but... Actually wait `json_encode` escapes slash by default? Let me recall carefully. PHP json_encode default does NOT escape forward slashes... Hmm. Actually it's the opposite: `json_encode("a/b")` yields `"a\/b"` by default. Yes, json_encode escapes forward slashes by default (i.e., without JSON_UNESCAPED_SLASHES, slash is escaped as `\/`). So `</script>` inside a JS string is safe from breaking out at HTML parsing level because there's no literal `</script>` sequence. So the XSS risk through `</script>` is mitigated by default json_encode slash escaping.
But what if the payload contains `<!--`? That doesn't break script. So using json_encode|raw inline script is mostly safe when slash-escaping is default. The review rule says never use `|raw` without sanitization; but the project widely uses `{{ allMembers|json_encode|raw }}` pattern everywhere (templates/ssma/...). So it's an established project pattern. I'd downgrade #7 to low/not worth a comment given the project convention and slash escaping default. But there could still be an HTML attribute context issue: none; these are inside `<script>`. I'll skip #7 or make it low note? The instructions say "Focus on issues in newly added code". I'll possibly skip #7 to avoid noise since it follows existing project-wide pattern and json_encode default escapes `/`.
However there is a subtle XSS with `aut|json_encode|e('html_attr')` in the create tab for `data-aut` attribute of the edit button: `aut|json_encode|e('html_attr')`. That's existing code? The edit button has been there before; the diff didn't add it. Actually the diff kept the edit button inside the create permission conditional and moved the eye button out. The data-aut attr was unchanged (already existed). Not a new addition.
Now let me analyze the biggest concrete new-code bugs:
A. New fields area_id/tipo/aprovador sent but not persisted by authorizationSave endpoint (confirmed). High severity.
B. In settings tab, the approver picker "role" kind list uses `catalogRoles` (aut_company_roles). Good.
C. Bug: `_modal_authorization_form.html.twig` uses `allMembers` in loop, but this file is included from create tab with `allMembers: allMembers|default([])`. OK.
D. Bug in create tab: In the "shown.bs.modal" handler (line 1651-1656), they iterate AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS and restore values from the actual select .val(). But before that in the shown handler, pendingAutCriarFill may apply fields via applyAutCriarModalFields. Potential ordering issue: resetModal runs before modal show, setting selects to ''; then pending fill applies after show? Actually the shown.bs.modal handler runs after show is complete, and in populateAutCriarModal they set pendingAutCriarFill=aut then .modal('show'); on shown handler, applyAutCriarModalFields(pendingAutCriarFill); pendingAutCriarFill = null. So fine.
E. The tip-select value type mismatch: `readAutCriarSelectId` returns parseInt || 0; so if an option value of area was something else like non-numeric, returns 0. Company areas numeric IDs, fine.
F. areaId numeric; but `aut.area_id` might be returned as null for new options? ensureAutCriarSelectOption with empty areaId returns early. Then setAutCriarSelectValue('autCriarArea', '') resets to placeholder. Fine for old records (no area set). For edit old records, area optional select blank with required validation on save: then on save, if editing an old authorization without area, it becomes invalid unless user picks area. That's potentially regression: old authorizations lack area; editing an old authorization and saving without adding area gets blocked because area now mandatory in frontend. But new columns are nullable and old rows have no area. Since backend does not validate area_id anyway, the front-end validation will prevent saving old authorization unless a new area is selected. That may be intentional (they want them backfilled). Not necessarily a bug; but worth noting? It's a user-experience issue: editing a legacy authorization (with null area/tipo) can't be saved without choosing area/tipo; but since the backend doesn't persist anyway, inconsistent. Given A exists, no need to add separately.
G. In `_modal_authorization_form.html.twig`, `autCriarTipo` required is type select options built from aut_authorization_types. If no types configured yet (empty), user cannot create authorization because tipo has no options and it's required. And area from aut_company_areas presumably always at least one area? If a company has no areas, create is impossible. That might be acceptable given business rule that you need to configure types first. Should mention? If no types configured in Configurações, the create modal's Tipo select only has placeholder, and tipo required prevents save. The hint not present. This is intended maybe: "Organize as autorizações por área responsável..." Types come from Configurações. The PR says nothing about requiring types before creating. But if creating authorizations now requires tipo which is chosen from configurable types list, and the config list can be empty by default, existing flows break (cannot create new authorization until an admin configures types). This is a real regression risk but tied to business model. However, since the backend ignores tipo anyway, and the create page now blocks saves when tipo empty, in an environment where no types exist (default DB state), creation is blocked entirely. That's an important functional regression, but it's deliberate front-end required field matching the new model. I'll mention with A in one combined comment or separate. Hmm, since backend validation doesn't require tipo/area, the front-end makes create impossible in fresh installs until config types. I'd note this as medium severity but maybe not separate. Let me not over-comment.
H. The `_tab_authorizations_settings` includes `_modal_add_approver` which itself includes a `<style>` and a modal embed. The modal id `govAuthAddApproverModal` also listed in hoisting list in index.html.twig to move to body. Since modal template is inside the settings tab (tab panel possibly hidden), the hoisting handles moving it to body. That was in the changed index list (added id in array). Good.
I. There's a risk: The settings tab renders `_modal_add_approver` only when ssmaCanManageConfig (since tab content only rendered then). Good.
J. Check `pickerSearch`, etc. JS looks robust.
K. In modal add approver footer, button `data-dismiss="modal"` used for Cancelar, but the JS uses bootstrap modal. With Bootstrap 4/5 jQuery, data-dismiss still works? They included `_modal.html.twig`? It might be data-dismiss-modal etc. The Cancel button uses data-dismiss="modal" while the rest of project may use `.mhs-btn-cancel` with a data-dismiss attr. Hard to confirm. Actually the modal embed; existing patterns likely data-dismiss="modal" works with jQuery bootstrap.
Potential issue: When picker opens, `renderPickerRows` hides approvers already added via `hasApproverRow`. But for rows added in the same session after adding (then reopen), those are shown. Good.
Bug: when you add approver rows in picker via submitPicker with specific areas and then you close and reopen picker, previously chosen approvers excluded. Fine.
Now let's look more into the "settings" requirement: when both flags are unchecked, member is re-enabled. syncApproverMode handles. Good.
Potential bug: In `syncApproverMode` they scheduleSave on change even when skipSave true; fine. Actually during init, checkbox change events aren't fired. `syncApproverMode()` called directly at end with skipSave true. Fine.
Now, potential issue with `hasApproverRow(kind, id)`: attribute selector `'[data-kind="' + kind + '"][data-id="' + String(id) + '"]'` — works.
Approver list removal uses `chip.classList.contains('gov-auth-approver-row__person')`; personChip gets class gov-auth-settings-chip gov-auth-approver-row__person. Good.
Now CSS duplication: `.gov-auth-settings-chip` styles in both settings tab and modal partial (with different parent selectors: `#governance_auth_settings_content .gov-auth-settings-chip` in settings, and `#govAuthAddApproverModal .gov-auth-settings-chip` in modal). In picker body (modal), the chips are created inside `.gov-auth-picker-area` within modal `#govAuthAddApproverModal`. So styles apply. OK.
But settings' list CSS `#governance_auth_settings_content .gov-auth-settings-chip` works for the settings page. Since modal is inside tab content initially (moved to body), but the modal styling is in the partial. OK.
But wait: Since modal partial included in settings tab content that is inside `#governance_auth_settings_content`? The include is outside the `.gov-auth-settings-content` div (after it). The style is global. The chips inside modal need `#govAuthAddApproverModal .gov-auth-settings-chip` style. Yes defined in modal partial.
But when the modal is appended to body, the styles still apply because defined globally in the page <style>. Fine.
Now potential missing: The picker uses the same class `gov-auth-settings-chip` inside the settings area AND modal. The chips inside settings (`govAuthTypeChips`, approverList rows) and inside picker area row are created with createChip. All good.
One subtle bug: In `setPickerRowAreas`, when `allAreas` false they add `is-limited` class but keep select visible; selecting another type adds chips. The picker select options include only types not already selected. fillAreaSelect builds. OK.
Now #1 God template: heavy inline script/style - strong finding.
Now #9 empty function `ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers`: it's defined empty in create tab and called in settings persist's done. Empty function = misleading but harmless. Also if create tab isn't present (e.g., when settings tab accessible but create permission false — but can you have ssmaCanManageConfig true and ssmaCanCreateAuthorization false? ssmaCanCreateAuthorization gates the entire create tab; but the settings tab is only in the same page index... Let me see, both permissions come from same module config? Possibly. If a user has canManageConfig but not canCreate, then the create tab isn't rendered, so the function isn't defined; the settings persist calls window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers guarded by typeof check. Fine.)
Wait, settings autosave calls `window.ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes` which is defined only in create tab script. If a user can manage config but cannot create authorization (so create tab not included), then `ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes` is not defined, and since it's guarded with typeof check, it just doesn't update — fine (no creation modal present). And `ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers` empty defined in create tab script. Both no-ops when tab not rendered. OK.
Now the empty function at line 2419; maybe I can note it briefly as low priority.
Wait, one more critical check: the "no create permission" view-only scenario. index.html.twig gates the entire create tab behind ssmaCanCreateAuthorization, so the table+view button are not rendered for those who cannot create. Then why change the autActionsCell code to move the eye button out of the create-permission block? Maybe this template is reused elsewhere where not gated? Only include in index line 59 under `{% if ssmaCanCreateAuthorization %}`. So the change is dead in practice (unless other include path that I haven't found - we found only one). Not worth commenting.
Let me now confirm the actual behavior in the settings tab for `initialApproverRoles` — the variables used are aut_authorization_approver_members/roles (passed by hub) but the JS expects area_keys/all_areas. Config service getViewData returns approvers shape with id, name, all_areas, area_keys. Need to confirm view shape matches `hydrateAssignments` fields: item.id, item.name, item.all_areas, item.area_keys. In governance config service getViewData? Let me quickly check the service getViewData for shape.
Also, the config save response from service savePayload returns approver_members and roles with fields. Let me read the config service quickly to double-check that the front-end's POST payload keys (authorization_types, use_members, use_roles, approver_members[{id, all_areas, area_keys}], approver_roles) are what savePayload expects.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "function savePayload|function getViewData|function getTypeLabels", "file_patterns": ["src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigService.php"]}
Result
No matches found
Request #30
deepseek-v4-flash
P:124.78K C:50 CR:124.67K CW:0
1784ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_find
Show Details
Arguments
{"query_name": "GovernanceAuthorizationConfigService"}
Result
src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigService.php tests/Unit/Product/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigServiceTest.php
Request #31
deepseek-v4-flash
P:124.87K C:57 CR:124.8K CW:0
1515ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigService.php"}
Result
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigService.php (Total lines: 631)
IS_TRUNCATED: true
LINE_RANGE: 1-500
1|<?php
2|
3|declare(strict_types=1);
4|
5|namespace App\Service\Governance;
6|
7|use App\Entity\Company;
8|use App\Entity\CompanyMembers;
9|use App\Entity\GovernanceAuthorizationApprover;
10|use App\Entity\GovernanceAuthorizationConfig;
11|use App\Entity\GovernanceAuthorizationType;
12|use App\Entity\Roles;
13|use App\Entity\User;
14|use App\Repository\GovernanceAuthorizationConfigRepository;
15|use App\Repository\GovernanceCaseHistoryRepository;
16|use Doctrine\ORM\EntityManagerInterface;
17|
18|final class GovernanceAuthorizationConfigService
19|{
20| private const MAX_TYPE_LENGTH = 80;
21| private const MAX_TYPES = 100;
22| private const MAX_APPROVER_IDS = 200;
23|
24| public function __construct(
25| private EntityManagerInterface $em,
26| private GovernanceAuthorizationConfigRepository $repository,
27| ) {
28| }
29|
30| /**
31| * @return array{
32| * aut_authorization_types: list<string>,
33| * aut_authorization_use_members: bool,
34| * aut_authorization_use_roles: bool,
35| * aut_authorization_approver_members: list<array{id: int, name: string, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}>,
36| * aut_authorization_approver_roles: list<array{id: int, name: string, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}>,
37| * aut_company_roles: list<array{id: int, name: string}>
38| * }
39| */
40| public function getViewData(Company $company): array
41| {
42| $config = $this->repository->findOneByCompany($company);
43| $hasConfig = $config instanceof GovernanceAuthorizationConfig;
44| [$useMembers, $useRoles] = $this->resolveUseFlags(
45| $hasConfig ? $config->usesMembers() : true,
46| $hasConfig ? $config->usesRoles() : false,
47| );
48|
49| return [
50| 'aut_authorization_types' => $hasConfig ? $config->getTypeLabels() : [],
51| 'aut_authorization_use_members' => $useMembers,
52| 'aut_authorization_use_roles' => $useRoles,
53| 'aut_authorization_approver_members' => $hasConfig ? $this->mapApprovers($config->getMemberApprovers(), 'member') : [],
54| 'aut_authorization_approver_roles' => $hasConfig ? $this->mapApprovers($config->getRoleApprovers(), 'role') : [],
55| 'aut_company_roles' => $this->listCompanyRoles($company),
56| ];
57| }
58|
59| /**
60| * @param array<string, mixed> $payload
61| *
62| * @return array{
63| * authorization_types: list<string>,
64| * use_members: bool,
65| * use_roles: bool,
66| * approver_members: list<array{id: int, name: string, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}>,
67| * approver_roles: list<array{id: int, name: string, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}>
68| * }
69| */
70| public function savePayload(Company $company, array $payload, ?User $user = null): array
71| {
72| $typeLabels = $this->normalizeTypes($payload['authorization_types'] ?? []);
73| [$useMembers, $useRoles] = $this->resolveUseFlags(
74| $this->normalizeBoolean($payload['use_members'] ?? true, 'use_members'),
75| $this->normalizeBoolean($payload['use_roles'] ?? false, 'use_roles'),
76| );
77|
78| $memberAssignments = $this->normalizeApproverPayload(
79| $payload['approver_members'] ?? [],
80| $typeLabels,
81| 'approver_members'
82| );
83| $roleAssignments = $this->normalizeApproverPayload(
84| $payload['approver_roles'] ?? [],
85| $typeLabels,
86| 'approver_roles'
87| );
88|
89| $this->assertMembersBelongToCompany($company, array_column($memberAssignments, 'id'));
90| $this->assertRolesBelongToCompany($company, array_column($roleAssignments, 'id'));
91|
92| $config = $this->findOrCreate($company, $user);
93| $config
94| ->setUseMembers($useMembers)
95| ->setUseRoles($useRoles)
96| ->setUpdatedBy($user);
97|
98| $config->clearApprovers();
99| $typesByKey = $this->syncTypes($config, $typeLabels);
100| $this->syncApprovers($config, $company, $memberAssignments, $roleAssignments, $typesByKey);
101|
102| $this->repository->save($config);
103|
104| return [
105| 'authorization_types' => $config->getTypeLabels(),
106| 'use_members' => $config->usesMembers(),
107| 'use_roles' => $config->usesRoles(),
108| 'approver_members' => $this->mapApprovers($config->getMemberApprovers(), 'member'),
109| 'approver_roles' => $this->mapApprovers($config->getRoleApprovers(), 'role'),
110| ];
111| }
112|
113| public function resolveTypeLabel(Company $company, string $tipo): ?string
114| {
115| $needle = mb_strtolower(trim($tipo));
116| if ($needle === '') {
117| return null;
118| }
119|
120| $config = $this->repository->findOneByCompany($company);
121| if (!$config instanceof GovernanceAuthorizationConfig) {
122| return null;
123| }
124|
125| foreach ($config->getTypeLabels() as $label) {
126| if (mb_strtolower($label) === $needle) {
127| return $label;
128| }
129| }
130|
131| return null;
132| }
133|
134| public function hasConfiguredTypes(Company $company): bool
135| {
136| $config = $this->repository->findOneByCompany($company);
137|
138| return $config instanceof GovernanceAuthorizationConfig
139| && $config->getTypeLabels() !== [];
140| }
141|
142| private function findOrCreate(Company $company, ?User $user): GovernanceAuthorizationConfig
143| {
144| $config = $this->repository->findOneByCompany($company);
145| if ($config instanceof GovernanceAuthorizationConfig) {
146| return $config;
147| }
148|
149| $config = new GovernanceAuthorizationConfig();
150| $config->setCompany($company);
151| if ($user instanceof User) {
152| $config->setCreatedBy($user);
153| }
154|
155| return $config;
156| }
157|
158| /**
159| * @param list<string> $labels
160| *
161| * @return array<string, GovernanceAuthorizationType>
162| */
163| private function syncTypes(GovernanceAuthorizationConfig $config, array $labels): array
164| {
165| $kept = [];
166| $byKey = [];
167| foreach ($config->getTypes() as $type) {
168| $byKey[mb_strtolower($type->getLabel())] = $type;
169| }
170|
171| foreach ($labels as $position => $label) {
172| $key = mb_strtolower($label);
173| $type = $byKey[$key] ?? null;
174| if (!$type instanceof GovernanceAuthorizationType) {
175| $type = new GovernanceAuthorizationType();
176| $config->addType($type);
177| }
178| $type->setLabel($label)->setPosition($position);
179| $kept[] = $type;
180| }
181|
182| foreach ($config->getTypes()->toArray() as $type) {
183| if (!in_array($type, $kept, true)) {
184| $config->removeType($type);
185| }
186| }
187|
188| $map = [];
189| foreach ($kept as $type) {
190| $map[mb_strtolower($type->getLabel())] = $type;
191| }
192|
193| return $map;
194| }
195|
196| /**
197| * @param list<array{id: int, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}> $memberAssignments
198| * @param list<array{id: int, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}> $roleAssignments
199| * @param array<string, GovernanceAuthorizationType> $typesByKey
200| */
201| private function syncApprovers(
202| GovernanceAuthorizationConfig $config,
203| Company $company,
204| array $memberAssignments,
205| array $roleAssignments,
206| array $typesByKey,
207| ): void {
208| $position = 0;
209|
210| foreach ($memberAssignments as $assignment) {
211| $member = $this->findUsableMember($company, $assignment['id']);
212| if (!$member instanceof CompanyMembers) {
213| continue;
214| }
215|
216| $config->addApprover($this->buildApprover($member, null, $assignment, $typesByKey, $position));
217| ++$position;
218| }
219|
220| foreach ($roleAssignments as $assignment) {
221| $role = $this->findUsableRole($company, $assignment['id']);
222| if (!$role instanceof Roles) {
223| continue;
224| }
225|
226| $config->addApprover($this->buildApprover(null, $role, $assignment, $typesByKey, $position));
227| ++$position;
228| }
229| }
230|
231| /**
232| * @param array{id: int, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>} $assignment
233| * @param array<string, GovernanceAuthorizationType> $typesByKey
234| */
235| private function buildApprover(
236| ?CompanyMembers $member,
237| ?Roles $role,
238| array $assignment,
239| array $typesByKey,
240| int $position,
241| ): GovernanceAuthorizationApprover {
242| $approver = new GovernanceAuthorizationApprover();
243| $approver
244| ->setMember($member)
245| ->setRole($role)
246| ->setPosition($position);
247|
248| $allAreas = !empty($assignment['all_areas']);
249| if ($allAreas) {
250| $approver->setAllAreas(true);
251|
252| return $approver;
253| }
254|
255| $areaKeys = $assignment['area_keys'] ?? [];
256| if ($areaKeys === []) {
257| throw new \InvalidArgumentException(
258| 'Informe ao menos um tipo de autorização para o aprovador com escopo restrito.'
259| );
260| }
261|
262| $approver->setAllAreas(false);
263| foreach ($areaKeys as $label) {
264| $type = $typesByKey[mb_strtolower($label)] ?? null;
265| if (!$type instanceof GovernanceAuthorizationType) {
266| throw new \InvalidArgumentException(sprintf(
267| 'Tipo de autorização desconhecido: %s.',
268| $label
269| ));
270| }
271| $approver->addApplicationType($type);
272| }
273|
274| return $approver;
275| }
276|
277| /**
278| * @param list<GovernanceAuthorizationApprover> $approvers
279| *
280| * @return list<array{id: int, name: string, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}>
281| */
282| private function mapApprovers(array $approvers, string $kind): array
283| {
284| $rows = [];
285| foreach ($approvers as $approver) {
286| if ($kind === 'member') {
287| $subject = $approver->getMember();
288| if (!$subject instanceof CompanyMembers || $subject->getIsRemoved()) {
289| continue;
290| }
291| $name = trim(GovernanceCaseHistoryRepository::resolveMemberDisplayName($subject));
292| $fallback = 'Membro #' . $subject->getId();
293| } else {
294| $subject = $approver->getRole();
295| if (!$subject instanceof Roles || $subject->getIsRemoved()) {
296| continue;
297| }
298| $name = trim((string) $subject->getName());
299| $fallback = 'Cargo #' . $subject->getId();
300| }
301|
302| $rows[] = [
303| 'id' => (int) $subject->getId(),
304| 'name' => $name !== '' ? $name : $fallback,
305| 'all_areas' => $approver->usesAllAreas(),
306| 'area_keys' => $approver->getApplicationTypeLabels(),
307| ];
308| }
309|
310| return $rows;
311| }
312|
313| /**
314| * @param mixed $raw
315| *
316| * @return list<string>
317| */
318| private function normalizeTypes(mixed $raw): array
319| {
320| if (!is_array($raw)) {
321| throw new \InvalidArgumentException('Tipos de autorização inválidos.');
322| }
323|
324| $normalized = [];
325| $seen = [];
326|
327| foreach ($raw as $item) {
328| if (!is_string($item) && !is_numeric($item)) {
329| throw new \InvalidArgumentException('Tipos de autorização inválidos.');
330| }
331|
332| $label = trim((string) $item);
333| if ($label === '') {
334| continue;
335| }
336|
337| if (mb_strlen($label) > self::MAX_TYPE_LENGTH) {
338| throw new \InvalidArgumentException(sprintf(
339| 'Tipo de autorização deve ter no máximo %d caracteres.',
340| self::MAX_TYPE_LENGTH
341| ));
342| }
343|
344| $key = mb_strtolower($label);
345| if (isset($seen[$key])) {
346| continue;
347| }
348|
349| $seen[$key] = true;
350| $normalized[] = $label;
351|
352| if (count($normalized) > self::MAX_TYPES) {
353| throw new \InvalidArgumentException(sprintf(
354| 'É permitido cadastrar no máximo %d tipos de autorização.',
355| self::MAX_TYPES
356| ));
357| }
358| }
359|
360| return $normalized;
361| }
362|
363| /**
364| * @param list<int> $memberIds
365| */
366| private function assertMembersBelongToCompany(Company $company, array $memberIds): void
367| {
368| foreach ($memberIds as $memberId) {
369| if (!$this->findUsableMember($company, $memberId) instanceof CompanyMembers) {
370| throw new \InvalidArgumentException('Membro aprovador inválido.');
371| }
372| }
373| }
374|
375| /**
376| * @param list<int> $roleIds
377| */
378| private function assertRolesBelongToCompany(Company $company, array $roleIds): void
379| {
380| foreach ($roleIds as $roleId) {
381| if (!$this->findUsableRole($company, $roleId) instanceof Roles) {
382| throw new \InvalidArgumentException('Cargo aprovador inválido.');
383| }
384| }
385| }
386|
387| private function findUsableMember(Company $company, int $memberId): ?CompanyMembers
388| {
389| $member = $this->em->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->findOneBy([
390| 'id' => $memberId,
391| 'company' => $company,
392| 'isRemoved' => 0,
393| ]);
394|
395| return $member instanceof CompanyMembers ? $member : null;
396| }
397|
398| private function findUsableRole(Company $company, int $roleId): ?Roles
399| {
400| $role = $this->em->getRepository(Roles::class)->find($roleId);
401| if (
402| !$role instanceof Roles
403| || $role->getCompany()?->getId() !== $company->getId()
404| || $role->getIsRemoved()
405| ) {
406| return null;
407| }
408|
409| return $role;
410| }
411|
412| /**
413| * @return array{0: bool, 1: bool}
414| */
415| private function resolveUseFlags(bool $useMembers, bool $useRoles): array
416| {
417| if (!$useMembers && !$useRoles) {
418| $useMembers = true;
419| }
420|
421| return [$useMembers, $useRoles];
422| }
423|
424| /**
425| * @param mixed $raw
426| * @param list<string> $types
427| *
428| * @return list<array{id: int, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}>
429| */
430| private function normalizeApproverPayload(mixed $raw, array $types, string $field): array
431| {
432| if (!is_array($raw)) {
433| throw new \InvalidArgumentException(sprintf('Lista inválida: %s.', $field));
434| }
435|
436| $canonicalTypes = [];
437| foreach ($types as $label) {
438| $canonicalTypes[mb_strtolower($label)] = $label;
439| }
440|
441| $normalized = [];
442| $seen = [];
443|
444| foreach ($raw as $item) {
445| $allAreas = true;
446| $areaKeys = [];
447|
448| if (is_array($item)) {
449| $id = $this->parsePositiveId($item['id'] ?? null, $field);
450| $allAreasSpecified = array_key_exists('all_areas', $item);
451| if ($allAreasSpecified) {
452| $allAreas = $this->normalizeBoolean($item['all_areas'], 'all_areas');
453| }
454| $areaKeys = $this->filterAreaKeys(
455| array_key_exists('area_keys', $item) ? $item['area_keys'] : [],
456| $canonicalTypes,
457| $field
458| );
459| if (!$allAreasSpecified && $areaKeys !== []) {
460| $allAreas = false;
461| }
462| } else {
463| $id = $this->parsePositiveId($item, $field);
464| }
465|
466| if (isset($seen[$id])) {
467| throw new \InvalidArgumentException(sprintf('Identificador duplicado em %s.', $field));
468| }
469|
470| if (!$allAreas && $areaKeys === []) {
471| throw new \InvalidArgumentException(sprintf(
472| 'Informe ao menos um tipo de autorização quando all_areas=false em %s.',
473| $field
474| ));
475| }
476|
477| if ($allAreas) {
478| $areaKeys = [];
479| }
480|
481| $seen[$id] = true;
482| $normalized[] = [
483| 'id' => $id,
484| 'all_areas' => $allAreas,
485| 'area_keys' => $areaKeys,
486| ];
487|
488| if (count($normalized) > self::MAX_APPROVER_IDS) {
489| throw new \InvalidArgumentException(sprintf(
490| 'É permitido cadastrar no máximo %d aprovadores em %s.',
491| self::MAX_APPROVER_IDS,
492| $field
493| ));
494| }
495| }
496|
497| return $normalized;
498| }
499|
500| /**
Note: Results truncated to 500 lines. Please narrow your line range.
Request #32
deepseek-v4-flash
P:129.93K C:1.2K CR:124.93K CW:0
10553ms
Reasoning
The service looks robust, and the payload contract matches. Good. The front-end/backend contract for config matches (POST body keys: authorization_types, use_members, use_roles, approver_members, approver_roles). Good.
So the remaining front-end mismatches:
1. `_tab_authorizations_settings` scheduleSave, etc., match service keys. Fine.
2. For modal create fields: They send `area_id`, `tipo`, `aprovador_id`, `aprovador_role_id`. The controller authorizationSave doesn't persist them. Confirm the entity getters map `getAprovadorMember()`, `getAprovadorRole()`, `getArea()`, `getTipo()`. And also need to confirm that `toArray` returns aprovador role member name? applyAutCriarModalFields reads `aut.aprovador.name` and `aut.aprovador_role.name`, `aut.area.name`. toArray only returns `area_id`, `aprovador_id`, `aprovador_role_id`, `tipo` — NOT the names nor nested objects! Let me recheck: repository toArray returns:
- area_id (id only)
- aprovador_id (id only)
- aprovador_role_id (id only)
- tipo
But modal fields applyAutCriarModalFields calls `ensureAutCriarSelectOption('autCriarArea', areaId, aut.area_name || (aut.area && aut.area.name) || '')`. If toArray doesn't include area_name or area object, then after ensureAutCriarSelectOption appends an option with text = '' fallback = areaId. Actually the fallback: text uses str if text empty. So option text shows the ID, weird, but functional. However the real prefill source is `AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG[autId]` or the `data-aut` attr row that comes from loadAuthorizationsData which likely has area_name etc. We need to check where the aut rows come from in loadAuthorizationsData; could include area_name? Let's check GovernanceController buildAuthorizationViewData around 1297 where 'aut_rows' etc. Let me read lines 1240-1330 to understand the data shape passed to the create tab (aut_all). The create list iterates aut_all, each has id, titulo, requisitos, status_real, validade_exibicao, responsavel, etc. It might include area info, or not. This affects edit prefill for new fields. But for new authorizations (just created), autAll refreshes after reload.
Given data-aut attribute encodes the whole row; if area_name isn't in row, option text fallback will be ID, or if area id matches existing area option in aut_modal_area_options, ensureAutCriarSelectOption finds an existing option (id matches existing option value), so no append. Then setAutCriarSelectValue selects that option. And display shows the label from the option. Wait, ensureAutCriarSelectOption only checks option existence. When editing an existing area, the area option is already present in the select (from aut_modal_area_options) if area exists in company areas. So it will set select value to areaId. Good. For tipos, if tipo string matches an existing type option (they come from config), likewise OK. If old authorization tipo not in list (deleted type), then the option not exist → append with text 'tipo'. Good.
For aprovador (member) — the option list from allMembers; member id exists; OK. If removed member - fallback text id.
So applyAutCriarModalFields is resilient enough; we don't strictly need nested name objects.
So the primary data contract bug is the backend not persisting new fields (area_id/tipo/aprovador_*). We can only attach the comment to the payload lines.
Now, is it possible the backend controller for authorizationSave is NOT in the final target branch? The review scope is templates only; controller is considered existing from model branch merge. But this could be a known gap. Given the PR's own risk note, flagging is appropriate with high severity. But as we cannot attach a comment to the controller, we attach to front-end lines in the create tab (the newly added payload fields). We'll frame it accordingly: "Este payload (novos campos) ... o endpoint de gravação governança_authorization_save -> authorizationSave não grava esses campos". Yes.
Now check for a more obvious in-scope bug in the create tab: `descricao` validation ordering, fine.
Now let me double-check that `AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG` data from `loadAuthorizationsData` includes area/aprovador/tipo values for edit. Actually if the backend doesn't persist them, whatever.
Let me check the offcanvas detail body template? It's not in review group. Skip.
Next let me review the `_modal_add_approver.html.twig` static markup: footer button Cancelar has `data-dismiss="modal"`. In this project, `_modal.html.twig` may require `data-dismiss` attr consistent with bootstrap. Search within templates for `data-dismiss="modal"` usage to confirm convention.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "data-dismiss=\"modal\"", "file_patterns": ["templates/governance/**", "templates/components/_modal.html.twig"]}
Result
File: templates/components/_modal.html.twig Match lines: 2 61| <button type="button" class="close mhs-modal-close" data-dismiss="modal" aria-label="Close"> 84| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_add_approver.html.twig Match lines: 1 54| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_apply_authorization.html.twig Match lines: 1 64| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_block_member.html.twig Match lines: 1 28| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_deactivate.html.twig Match lines: 1 32| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_delete.html.twig Match lines: 1 22| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_delete_blocked.html.twig Match lines: 1 20| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-primary" data-dismiss="modal"> File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig Match lines: 1 241| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_in_use.html.twig Match lines: 1 32| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_reactivate.html.twig Match lines: 1 29| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_extend_validity.html.twig Match lines: 1 40| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_remove_authorization.html.twig Match lines: 1 22| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_deactivate.html.twig Match lines: 1 32| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_delete.html.twig Match lines: 1 20| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_delete_blocked.html.twig Match lines: 1 20| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-primary" data-dismiss="modal"> File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_form.html.twig Match lines: 1 148| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_in_use.html.twig Match lines: 1 32| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_reactivate.html.twig Match lines: 1 29| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_send_notification.html.twig Match lines: 1 28| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/badge/partials/_modal_print_badges.html.twig Match lines: 1 199| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/badge/partials/_modal_save_config.html.twig Match lines: 1 38| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/cases/partials/_modal_cases_assign.html.twig Match lines: 1 45| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/cases/partials/_modal_cases_automation_delete.html.twig Match lines: 1 22| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/cases/partials/_modal_cases_block.html.twig Match lines: 1 32| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/cases/partials/_modal_cases_escalate.html.twig Match lines: 1 71| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/cases/partials/_modal_cases_escalate_cancel.html.twig Match lines: 1 32| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Voltar</button> File: templates/governance/cases/partials/_modal_cases_evidence.html.twig Match lines: 1 36| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/cases/partials/_modal_cases_exception.html.twig Match lines: 1 66| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/cases/partials/_modal_cases_exception_cancel.html.twig Match lines: 1 32| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Voltar</button> File: templates/governance/cases/partials/_modal_cases_intro.html.twig Match lines: 2 37| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel js-gov-cases-intro-close" data-dismiss="modal"> 40| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-primary js-gov-cases-intro-close" data-dismiss="modal"> File: templates/governance/cases/partials/_modal_cases_reopen.html.twig Match lines: 1 31| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/cases/partials/_modal_cases_resolve.html.twig Match lines: 1 33| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/cases/partials/_modal_cases_unblock.html.twig Match lines: 1 32| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/cases/partials/_modal_control_delete.html.twig Match lines: 1 21| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> File: templates/governance/member/partials/_modal_update_document.html.twig Match lines: 2 96| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button> 102| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Fechar</button>
Request #33
deepseek-v4-flash
P:133.18K C:1.52K CR:131.07K CW:0
13261ms
Reasoning
OK, `data-dismiss="modal"` is the convention. Fine.
Now let me check whether the create tab includes `_modal_authorization_form` with `allMembers` — at line 899 include. Let's read context around include lines 890-920, plus check AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG population and the missing new data issue. Then we can move to write comments.
Actually let me look at what data rows contain in terms of area/aprovador/tipo for edit. Let's find where aut_all is assembled (loadAuthorizationsData) in GovernanceController; whether it includes area/tipo/aprovador info per authorization for editing prefill. Also does it include aprovador_role? This is used to populate select. Search loadAuthorizationsData around lines 3013-3340.
Given time constraints, skip; focus on final comment list.
Let me now compose the findings to report as code comments, based on solid evidence:
Findings to report:
1. (High) God template: new files add ~1500 lines of CSS + JS inline in Twig; project has public/js/governance and public/css/governance for this exact module (governance-authorization.css, governance-hub-components.js, etc.), and review rules flag god template first. Attach to `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` start of `<script>` or top. Existing_code must match newly added lines. Since entire file is new, we can anchor to first lines of the script block e.g., ` var SAVE_URL = {{ path(...)...`; or anchor to `<style>` block start. Let's pick anchor lines: e.g., `var initialTypes = {{ aut_authorization_types|default([])|json_encode|raw }};` lines. Hmm anchor should be a consecutive code snippet present in the file. Let me anchor at the beginning of the settings script lines 295-296:
```
var SAVE_URL = {{ path('governance_authorization_config_save')|json_encode|raw }};
```
The file `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` lines 295 onwards:
Line 295: var SAVE_URL = {{ path...|raw }};
Let me read lines 290-330 to get exact anchors.
2. (High) Missing CSRF token on autosave POST to config save. Attach comment to persist() ajax call lines (574-586).
3. (High/Medium) Contract break: new required fields area/tipo not persisted by authorizationSave endpoint. Attach comment to payload lines 2065-2068 in create tab.
4. (Medium) settings autosave debounce without flush on page unload + full replacement semantics (concurrency/overwrite). Attach comment to scheduleSave function.
5. (Low) Empty `ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers` no-op misleading. Anchor at definition lines 2419-2420.
6. (Low/Medium) CSS duplication between the two new files — combine into #1.
7. (Medium) Perhaps: area & tipo now required in modal; if a company has no configured types (fresh state), creation is blocked entirely because tipo select is empty (no option to choose), and there is no hint about going to Configurações first. But since settings tab is the same page (with manage config), a user with only create permission but not manage config permission cannot configure types → cannot create authorizations ever until a config manager adds types. This is a functional regression. Given the business may want type optional for legacy, but they made it required. Actually required both frontend & maybe intended. This is a design/regression but is in-scope rule? The PR description says fields are required. It's by design. I'll skip.
But there's one more important and clear bug to verify: In create tab, in the payload, `descricao` and `titulo` from `aut.titulo` on edit. Not relevant.
Another bug to verify: settings' `typeInput` maxlength 80 matches server MAX_TYPE_LENGTH. Good.
The JS uses `color-mix` in CSS - modern browser. Fine.
Potential functional bug in the settings chips: The personChip remove button and area chips in the approver row: createChip appends removeBtn first then text span. When approverList click handler removes person chip (remove row), fine.
Now another subtle issue: when opening picker from roles option, they use `catalogRoles` = aut_company_roles which is only provided to the create tab? Actually aut_company_roles variable comes from hub view; since settings tab is in the same page, available. Yes.
Now consider `hasApproverRow` uses data-id and data-kind for role rows. When rendering picker rows, they exclude roles already added. However roles and members catalogs can have the same ID (role id vs member id), so distinguishing by kind is required and used. Good.
Bug: `renderPickerRows` sets the row `data-all-areas="1"` then `setPickerRowAreas(row, true, [])`. Good.
Bug in `setPickerRowAreas` for empty `areaKeys` with allAreas false — but they always guard.
Now what about the actual missing requirement in review: area keys labeling on approvers relates to "tipos de autorização" but naming "Área" (area keys = tipos). That is a domain naming mismatch but as business rule stated types are mapped as areas of application. Skip.
Potential issue: In create tab, options for tipo from `aut_modal_tipo_options` derived from aut_authorization_types but when editing, ensureAutCriarSelectOption for tipo uses `ensureAutCriarSelectOption('autCriarTipo', tipo, tipo)`. Fine.
Let me verify one functional bug on the settings tab: It sets `skipSave = true` initially and only `skipSave = false` at the end after hydration. On subsequent edits, changes saved. But the "Membros/Cargos" toggles: `bindOptionCard` on checkbox change → syncApproverMode → scheduleSave. syncApproverMode is also called directly at the end after hydration (with skipSave true) so no double save. Good.
Now, the missing type requirement for approver area select when no type configured: fillAreaSelect placeholder "Cadastre um tipo acima"; select disabled; approver rows all areas. Fine.
Let me now read the exact lines in settings template for anchors: lines 295-330 and around persist/scheduleSave lines (which line numbers). Earlier code_search returned 589-590 for the ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers call, and 295 for SAVE_URL. Let me read relevant sections to anchor precisely.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig", "start_line": 290, "end_line": 620}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig (Total lines: 1224)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 290-620
290|
291|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_add_approver.html.twig' %}
292|
293|<script>
294|(function () {
295| var SAVE_URL = {{ path('governance_authorization_config_save')|json_encode|raw }};
296| var ALL_AREAS_VALUE = '__all__';
297| var ALL_AREAS_LABEL = 'Todas as Áreas';
298| var initialTypes = {{ aut_authorization_types|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
299| var initialApproverMembers = {{ aut_authorization_approver_members|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
300| var initialApproverRoles = {{ aut_authorization_approver_roles|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
301|
302| var typeInput = document.getElementById('govAuthTypeInput');
303| var typeChips = document.getElementById('govAuthTypeChips');
304| var approverList = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverList');
305| var membersOption = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverMembersOption');
306| var rolesOption = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverRolesOption');
307| var useMembers = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverUseMembers');
308| var useRoles = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverUseRoles');
309| var membersWrap = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverMembersWrap');
310| var rolesWrap = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverRolesWrap');
311| var membersBtn = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverMembersBtn');
312| var rolesBtn = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverRolesBtn');
313| var pickerBody = document.getElementById('govAuthPickerBody');
314| var pickerSearch = document.getElementById('govAuthPickerSearch');
315| var pickerFilters = document.getElementById('govAuthPickerFilters');
316| var pickerFilterCargo = document.getElementById('govAuthPickerFilterCargo');
317| var pickerFilterTeam = document.getElementById('govAuthPickerFilterTeam');
318| var pickerFilterBond = document.getElementById('govAuthPickerFilterBond');
319| var pickerCheckAll = document.getElementById('govAuthPickerCheckAll');
320| var pickerSubmit = document.getElementById('govAuthPickerSubmit');
321| var catalogMembers = {{ allMembers|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
322| var catalogRoles = {{ aut_company_roles|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
323| var pickerKind = 'member';
324| var skipSave = true;
325| var saveTimer = null;
326| var saveSeq = 0;
327| var AVATAR_COLORS = ['#E85D4C', '#2F4A6E', '#3D9B6E', '#3B82F6', '#8B5CF6', '#F59E0B'];
328| var BOND_LABELS = { clt: 'CLT', terceiro: 'Terceiro' };
329|
330| function normalizeLabel(value) {
331| return String(value || '').replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim();
332| }
333|
334| function labelKey(value) {
335| return normalizeLabel(value).toLowerCase();
336| }
337|
338| function currentTypes() {
339| return collectChipLabels(typeChips);
340| }
341|
342| function createChip(label, key, extraAttrs, removable) {
343| var chip = document.createElement('span');
344| chip.className = 'gov-auth-settings-chip';
345| chip.setAttribute('role', 'listitem');
346| chip.setAttribute('data-type', key || labelKey(label));
347| if (extraAttrs) {
348| Object.keys(extraAttrs).forEach(function (name) {
349| if (extraAttrs[name] != null && extraAttrs[name] !== '') {
350| chip.setAttribute(name, extraAttrs[name]);
351| }
352| });
353| }
354| if (removable !== false) {
355| var removeBtn = document.createElement('button');
356| removeBtn.type = 'button';
357| removeBtn.className = 'gov-auth-settings-chip__remove';
358| removeBtn.setAttribute('aria-label', 'Remover ' + label);
359| removeBtn.innerHTML = '<i class="fas fa-times" aria-hidden="true"></i>';
360| chip.appendChild(removeBtn);
361| }
362| var text = document.createElement('span');
363| text.className = 'gov-auth-settings-chip__label';
364| text.textContent = label;
365| chip.appendChild(text);
366| return chip;
367| }
368|
369| function hasChip(container, value) {
370| var key = labelKey(value);
371| return Array.prototype.some.call(container.querySelectorAll('.gov-auth-settings-chip'), function (el) {
372| return el.getAttribute('data-type') === key;
373| });
374| }
375|
376| function addTypeChip(rawValue) {
377| var label = normalizeLabel(rawValue);
378| if (!label || !typeChips || hasChip(typeChips, label)) {
379| return false;
380| }
381| typeChips.appendChild(createChip(label, labelKey(label), { 'data-kind': 'type' }, true));
382| syncAllApproverAreaSelects();
383| scheduleSave();
384| return true;
385| }
386|
387| function collectChipLabels(container) {
388| if (!container) {
389| return [];
390| }
391| return Array.prototype.map.call(container.querySelectorAll('.gov-auth-settings-chip__label'), function (el) {
392| return normalizeLabel(el.textContent);
393| }).filter(Boolean);
394| }
395|
396| function hasApproverRow(kind, id) {
397| if (!approverList) {
398| return false;
399| }
400| return !!approverList.querySelector('.gov-auth-approver-row[data-kind="' + kind + '"][data-id="' + String(id) + '"]');
401| }
402|
403| function setRowAreas(row, allAreas, areaKeys) {
404| allAreas = !!allAreas;
405| areaKeys = Array.isArray(areaKeys) ? areaKeys.map(normalizeLabel).filter(Boolean) : [];
406| if (allAreas || areaKeys.length === 0) {
407| allAreas = true;
408| areaKeys = [];
409| }
410| row.setAttribute('data-all-areas', allAreas ? '1' : '0');
411| var areasWrap = row.querySelector('.gov-auth-approver-row__areas');
412| var areaSelect = row.querySelector('.gov-auth-approver-area-select');
413| Array.prototype.slice.call(areasWrap.querySelectorAll('.gov-auth-settings-chip')).forEach(function (chip) {
414| chip.remove();
415| });
416| if (allAreas) {
417| areasWrap.insertBefore(
418| createChip(ALL_AREAS_LABEL, ALL_AREAS_VALUE, { 'data-all': '1' }, false),
419| areaSelect
420| );
421| } else {
422| areaKeys.forEach(function (key) {
423| areasWrap.insertBefore(
424| createChip(key, 'area:' + labelKey(key), { 'data-area-key': key }, true),
425| areaSelect
426| );
427| });
428| }
429| rebuildApproverAreaSelect(row);
430| }
431|
432| function collectAreaKeys(root) {
433| if (!root) {
434| return [];
435| }
436| return Array.prototype.map.call(root.querySelectorAll('[data-area-key]'), function (el) {
437| return normalizeLabel(el.getAttribute('data-area-key'));
438| }).filter(Boolean);
439| }
440|
441| function selectedAreaKeyMap(root) {
442| var selectedKeys = {};
443| collectAreaKeys(root).forEach(function (key) {
444| selectedKeys[labelKey(key)] = true;
445| });
446| return selectedKeys;
447| }
448|
449| function fillAreaSelect(select, selectedKeys) {
450| if (!select) {
451| return;
452| }
453| var types = currentTypes();
454| select.innerHTML = '';
455| var placeholder = document.createElement('option');
456| placeholder.value = '';
457| placeholder.textContent = types.length ? 'Adicionar área' : 'Cadastre um tipo acima';
458| select.appendChild(placeholder);
459| if (types.length) {
460| var allOption = document.createElement('option');
461| allOption.value = ALL_AREAS_VALUE;
462| allOption.textContent = ALL_AREAS_LABEL;
463| select.appendChild(allOption);
464| }
465| types.forEach(function (label) {
466| if (selectedKeys[labelKey(label)]) {
467| return;
468| }
469| var option = document.createElement('option');
470| option.value = label;
471| option.textContent = label;
472| select.appendChild(option);
473| });
474| select.disabled = types.length === 0;
475| select.value = '';
476| }
477|
478| function rebuildApproverAreaSelect(row) {
479| fillAreaSelect(row.querySelector('.gov-auth-approver-area-select'), selectedAreaKeyMap(row));
480| }
481|
482| function rebuildPickerAreaSelect(row) {
483| fillAreaSelect(row.querySelector('.gov-auth-picker-area-select'), selectedAreaKeyMap(row));
484| }
485|
486| function syncAllApproverAreaSelects() {
487| if (!approverList) {
488| return;
489| }
490| var types = currentTypes();
491| var allowed = {};
492| types.forEach(function (label) {
493| allowed[labelKey(label)] = label;
494| });
495| Array.prototype.forEach.call(approverList.querySelectorAll('.gov-auth-approver-row'), function (row) {
496| if (row.getAttribute('data-all-areas') !== '1') {
497| var kept = collectAreaKeys(row).filter(function (key) {
498| return !!allowed[labelKey(key)];
499| }).map(function (key) {
500| return allowed[labelKey(key)];
501| });
502| setRowAreas(row, kept.length === 0, kept);
503| } else {
504| rebuildApproverAreaSelect(row);
505| }
506| });
507| }
508|
509| function addApproverRow(kind, id, name, allAreas, areaKeys, silent) {
510| if (!approverList || !id || hasApproverRow(kind, id)) {
511| return false;
512| }
513| var row = document.createElement('div');
514| row.className = 'gov-auth-approver-row';
515| row.setAttribute('data-kind', kind);
516| row.setAttribute('data-id', String(id));
517|
518| var personChip = createChip(name, kind + ':' + id, { 'data-kind': kind, 'data-id': String(id) }, true);
519| personChip.classList.add('gov-auth-approver-row__person');
520| row.appendChild(personChip);
521|
522| var areasWrap = document.createElement('div');
523| areasWrap.className = 'gov-auth-approver-row__areas';
524| var areaSelect = document.createElement('select');
525| areaSelect.className = 'gov-auth-approver-area-select';
526| areaSelect.setAttribute('aria-label', 'Áreas de aplicação de ' + name);
527| areasWrap.appendChild(areaSelect);
528| row.appendChild(areasWrap);
529| approverList.appendChild(row);
530|
531| setRowAreas(row, allAreas !== false, areaKeys || []);
532| if (!silent) {
533| scheduleSave();
534| }
535| return true;
536| }
537|
538| function collectApproverAssignments(kind) {
539| if (!approverList) {
540| return [];
541| }
542| return Array.prototype.map.call(approverList.querySelectorAll('.gov-auth-approver-row[data-kind="' + kind + '"]'), function (row) {
543| var allAreas = row.getAttribute('data-all-areas') === '1';
544| return {
545| id: parseInt(row.getAttribute('data-id'), 10) || 0,
546| all_areas: allAreas,
547| area_keys: allAreas ? [] : collectAreaKeys(row)
548| };
549| }).filter(function (item) {
550| return item.id > 0;
551| });
552| }
553|
554| function collectPayload() {
555| return {
556| authorization_types: currentTypes(),
557| use_members: !!(useMembers && useMembers.checked),
558| use_roles: !!(useRoles && useRoles.checked),
559| approver_members: collectApproverAssignments('member'),
560| approver_roles: collectApproverAssignments('role')
561| };
562| }
563|
564| function notifyError(message) {
565| if (typeof showToast === 'function') {
566| showToast(message || 'Não foi possível salvar as configurações.', 'Erro', 'fas fa-times', 'bg-danger');
567| }
568| }
569|
570| function persist() {
571| var seq = ++saveSeq;
572| var payload = collectPayload();
573| window.jQuery.ajax({
574| url: SAVE_URL,
575| method: 'POST',
576| contentType: 'application/json; charset=UTF-8',
577| data: JSON.stringify(payload)
578| }).done(function (res) {
579| if (seq !== saveSeq) {
580| return;
581| }
582| if (!res || !res.success) {
583| notifyError(res && res.message);
584| return;
585| }
586| if (typeof window.ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes === 'function') {
587| window.ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes(res.authorization_types || payload.authorization_types);
588| }
589| if (typeof window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers === 'function') {
590| window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers(res.approver_members || payload.approver_members);
591| }
592| }).fail(function (xhr) {
593| if (seq !== saveSeq) {
594| return;
595| }
596| var res = xhr && xhr.responseJSON;
597| notifyError(res && res.message);
598| });
599| }
600|
601| function scheduleSave() {
602| if (skipSave) {
603| return;
604| }
605| clearTimeout(saveTimer);
606| saveTimer = setTimeout(persist, 400);
607| }
608|
609| function syncApproverMode() {
610| var membersOn = !!(useMembers && useMembers.checked);
611| var rolesOn = !!(useRoles && useRoles.checked);
612|
613| if (!membersOn && !rolesOn && useMembers) {
614| useMembers.checked = true;
615| membersOn = true;
616| }
617|
618| if (membersOption) {
619| membersOption.classList.toggle('is-active', membersOn);
620| }
Request #34
deepseek-v4-flash
P:138.33K C:1.07K CR:134.66K CW:0
9341ms
Reasoning
Now check XSS detail in createChip: `removeBtn.innerHTML = '<i ...></i>'` — static, no user content. The `text.textContent` set from label (user data) - safe. `chip.setAttribute('aria-label', 'Remover ' + label)` — setAttribute safe.
`typeInput` keydown Enter - preventDefault. Fine.
Now, let me look at the last part of settings tab to see initial hydration & skipSave false and the addEventListener wiring for any obvious bugs; read lines 620-900 and 900-1224 quickly for bugs like the area select blur event or `pickerBody` change listener. Also check that the modal hides with jQuery but footer cancel uses data-dismiss.
Given the huge file, we've got enough for main comments. But let me at least double-check that the code sets `.gov-auth-picker-area` class with pill vs select toggling logic (done). I think we have enough.
Now confirm the `_modal_add_approver` file CSS includes duplicate chip styles. Yes. And settings tab CSS also includes chip styles. There's duplication.
Let me also verify exact lines for anchors in the modal file for god-template comment (style at line 62). Anchor: `<style>` start line 62 maybe. We'll anchor at lines 62-65:
```
<style>
#govAuthAddApproverModal.modal {
```
Present in new file.
For the create tab payload anchor at lines 2064-2068.
- 2064: ` responsavel_id: responsavelId,`
- 2065: ` area_id: areaId,`
- 2066: ` aprovador_id: aprovadorId || null,`
- 2067: ` aprovador_role_id: aprovadorRoleId || null,`
- 2068: ` tipo: tipo`
Anchor exact: lines 2065-2068 (they're new). We'll use those.
For empty function anchor line 2419-2420 in create tab. Actually the code_search shows line 2419 `window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers = function () {` and 2420 `};`. But diff shows `+ window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers = function () {` and `+ };`. Let me anchor:
```
window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers = function () {
};
```
For CSRF: anchor persist ajax lines 573-577.
For god template settings: I could anchor at `<script>` line 293? The `{` line might appear earlier. For the comment on this file, anchor to line 295? I'll use:
```
var initialTypes = {{ aut_authorization_types|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
```
Wait, anchor should be new added code. In the file diff everything is new. Anchor on exact snippet text: ` var SAVE_URL = {{ path('governance_authorization_config_save')|json_encode|raw }};` plus next line? For the code_comment tool, existing_code is matched to diff text lines. Since whole file is added, any line is fine.
Let's plan the code_comment calls with concrete anchors.
Additionally, I want to double check the CSRF: In this project, config save endpoint GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController::save doesn't validate CSRF. There is CSRF firewall? Many endpoints don't validate because requests are same-origin JSON with session cookies; CSRF protection might be provided by some global listener for routes starting /manager? Let's quickly search for a kernel-level CSRF listener. Search for "isCsrfTokenValid" broadly already; only specific controllers. But maybe there's a stateless/token auth with custom headers (X-Requested-With), which browsers' cross-origin simple requests can't include except forms... Actually the app may rely on SameSite=Lax/Strict cookies. Without confirming, mention it as a gap that mutating POST has no CSRF token - aligns with mandatory user rule.
Let me check whether the front-end includes CSRF meta/token for JSON AJAX elsewhere in the governance page (like badge flow includes `_csrf_token` inside the JSON body). Badge creates with `_csrf_token: badgeCsrfToken`; conditions save maybe with token? Let's search for `authorizationConditionsSave` endpoint in front-end templates - it may pass csrf. Search conditions save route used.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "authorization/conditions", "file_patterns": ["templates/"]}
Result
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "governance_authorization_conditions_save", "file_patterns": ["templates/"]}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_config.html.twig
Match lines: 1
27|{% set aut_conditions_save_url = path('governance_authorization_conditions_save') %}
Request #35
deepseek-v4-flash
P:32.74K C:174 CR:31.49K CW:0
2334ms
Reasoning
Let's look at how the config tab JS does save (CSRF token etc.), to compare patterns.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_config.html.twig"], "search_text": "csrf"}
Result
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_config.html.twig"], "search_text": "ajax("}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_config.html.twig
Match lines: 1
1167| $.ajax({
Request #36
deepseek-v4-flash
P:32.98K C:117 CR:32.9K CW:0
1799ms
Reasoning
Let's check what data that ajax sends; maybe form serialized with csrf.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_config.html.twig", "start_line": 1140, "end_line": 1210}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_config.html.twig (Total lines: 2125)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1140-1210
1140| currentConditions[index].active = active;
1141| return true;
1142| }
1143|
1144| /* ── persist ───────────────────────────────── */
1145| function persist(options) {
1146| options = options || {};
1147| var rows = currentConditions.map(function (item) {
1148| var row = {
1149| key: item.key,
1150| nome: item.nome,
1151| tipo: item.tipo,
1152| classif: item.classif,
1153| desc: item.desc,
1154| validade: item.validade || '',
1155| active: item.active
1156| };
1157| if (String(item.validade || '') === 'validade_fixa') {
1158| row.validade_fixa_valor = item.validade_fixa_valor || null;
1159| row.validade_fixa_unidade = item.validade_fixa_unidade || '';
1160| }
1161| if (Array.isArray(item.history) && item.history.length) {
1162| row.history = item.history;
1163| }
1164| return row;
1165| });
1166|
1167| $.ajax({
1168| url: SAVE_URL,
1169| method: 'POST',
1170| contentType: 'application/json; charset=UTF-8',
1171| data: JSON.stringify({ aut_conditions: rows })
1172| }).done(function (res) {
1173| if (res && res.success) {
1174| if (typeof window.ssmaRefreshAutConditions === 'function') {
1175| window.ssmaRefreshAutConditions(res.aut_conditions || rows);
1176| }
1177| if (typeof options.onSuccess === 'function') {
1178| options.onSuccess(res);
1179| }
1180| return;
1181| }
1182|
1183| if (typeof options.onError === 'function') {
1184| options.onError(res);
1185| }
1186| }).fail(function (xhr) {
1187| var msg = (xhr.responseJSON && xhr.responseJSON.message)
1188| ? xhr.responseJSON.message
1189| : 'Não foi possível salvar. Verifique os dados e tente novamente.';
1190| if (typeof showToast === 'function') {
1191| showToast(msg, 'Aviso', 'fas fa-exclamation-triangle', 'bg-warning');
1192| } else if (typeof window.alert === 'function') {
1193| window.alert(msg);
1194| }
1195| if (typeof options.onError === 'function') {
1196| options.onError(xhr);
1197| }
1198| reloadConditionsFromServer();
1199| });
1200| }
1201|
1202| function reloadConditionsFromServer() {
1203| $.get(GET_URL).done(function (res) {
1204| if (!res || !res.success) {
1205| return;
1206| }
1207| currentConditions = normalizeConditions(res.aut_conditions || []);
1208| renderTableFromState();
1209| if (typeof window.ssmaRefreshAutConditions === 'function') {
1210| window.ssmaRefreshAutConditions(currentConditions);
Request #37
deepseek-v4-flash
P:33.92K C:388 CR:33.02K CW:0
4427ms
Reasoning
So conditions save (a pre-existing tab) also doesn't include CSRF token. That suggests the codebase pattern for JSON POST autosave doesn't send CSRF (possibly relying on SameSite cookies or framework where CSRF disabled for these routes). Given the user rule "Toda mutação via formulário/AJAX envia {{ csrf_token(...) }} e o backend deve validar", we can still raise it as a security concern but acknowledge existing pattern. The PR-specific new code follows existing pattern. Given the review instruction weights security rules, but must be objective - if the whole codebase doesn't send CSRF on such JSON autosaves and the endpoint was merged from feature/cc-auth-config-model (API with GET/POST, controller not in diff), we can raise low/medium. I'll soften to medium but still mention it; keep as an observation since it's a new mutation endpoint introduced by this branch (controller may be in merged branch). Since controller is not in this PR's review files and not visible, I'll keep the comment with "verificar se o endpoint valida".
Now let me read remaining settings lines to catch other concrete bugs (e.g., the initial hydration, approver list ordering, save timer on unload). Also inspect lines 609-1223 to check bindings/initial calls for correctness (especially that everything has null checks). Let's read from 600.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig", "start_line": 609, "end_line": 1224}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig (Total lines: 1224)
IS_TRUNCATED: true
LINE_RANGE: 609-1108
609| function syncApproverMode() {
610| var membersOn = !!(useMembers && useMembers.checked);
611| var rolesOn = !!(useRoles && useRoles.checked);
612|
613| if (!membersOn && !rolesOn && useMembers) {
614| useMembers.checked = true;
615| membersOn = true;
616| }
617|
618| if (membersOption) {
619| membersOption.classList.toggle('is-active', membersOn);
620| }
621| if (rolesOption) {
622| rolesOption.classList.toggle('is-active', rolesOn);
623| }
624| if (membersWrap) {
625| membersWrap.classList.toggle('d-none', !membersOn);
626| }
627| if (rolesWrap) {
628| rolesWrap.classList.toggle('d-none', !rolesOn);
629| }
630| scheduleSave();
631| }
632|
633| function bindOptionCard(card, checkbox) {
634| if (!card || !checkbox) {
635| return;
636| }
637| card.addEventListener('click', function (event) {
638| if (event.target === checkbox || event.target.tagName === 'LABEL') {
639| return;
640| }
641| checkbox.checked = !checkbox.checked;
642| checkbox.dispatchEvent(new Event('change', { bubbles: true }));
643| });
644| checkbox.addEventListener('change', syncApproverMode);
645| }
646|
647| function bondLabel(value) {
648| var key = String(value || '').toLowerCase();
649| return BOND_LABELS[key] || '';
650| }
651|
652| function avatarColor(name) {
653| var total = 0;
654| String(name || '').split('').forEach(function (ch) {
655| total += ch.charCodeAt(0);
656| });
657| return AVATAR_COLORS[total % AVATAR_COLORS.length];
658| }
659|
660| function uniqueSorted(values) {
661| var seen = {};
662| var out = [];
663| (values || []).forEach(function (value) {
664| var label = normalizeLabel(value);
665| if (!label || seen[labelKey(label)]) {
666| return;
667| }
668| seen[labelKey(label)] = true;
669| out.push(label);
670| });
671| out.sort(function (a, b) {
672| return a.localeCompare(b, 'pt-BR');
673| });
674| return out;
675| }
676|
677| function fillFilterSelect(select, placeholder, values) {
678| if (!select) {
679| return;
680| }
681| var current = select.value;
682| select.innerHTML = '';
683| var first = document.createElement('option');
684| first.value = '';
685| first.textContent = placeholder;
686| select.appendChild(first);
687| uniqueSorted(values).forEach(function (value) {
688| var option = document.createElement('option');
689| option.value = value;
690| option.textContent = value;
691| select.appendChild(option);
692| });
693| select.value = current && Array.prototype.some.call(select.options, function (option) {
694| return option.value === current;
695| }) ? current : '';
696| }
697|
698| function fillPickerFilters() {
699| fillFilterSelect(pickerFilterCargo, 'Cargo', (catalogMembers || []).map(function (member) {
700| return member.position;
701| }));
702| fillFilterSelect(pickerFilterTeam, 'Time', (catalogMembers || []).reduce(function (acc, member) {
703| return acc.concat(member.team_names || []);
704| }, []));
705| fillFilterSelect(pickerFilterBond, 'Vínculo', (catalogMembers || []).map(function (member) {
706| return bondLabel(member.employment_bond);
707| }).filter(Boolean));
708| }
709|
710| function pickerCatalog() {
711| if (pickerKind === 'role') {
712| return (catalogRoles || []).map(function (role) {
713| return {
714| id: role.id,
715| name: role.name || ('Cargo #' + role.id),
716| email: '',
717| position: '',
718| team_names: [],
719| employment_bond: ''
720| };
721| });
722| }
723| return (catalogMembers || []).map(function (member) {
724| return {
725| id: member.id,
726| name: member.name || ('Membro #' + member.id),
727| email: member.email || '',
728| position: member.position || '',
729| team_names: member.team_names || [],
730| employment_bond: member.employment_bond || ''
731| };
732| });
733| }
734|
735| function pickerMatchesFilters(item) {
736| var query = labelKey(pickerSearch && pickerSearch.value);
737| if (query) {
738| var haystack = labelKey(item.name + ' ' + (item.email || '') + ' ' + (item.position || ''));
739| if (haystack.indexOf(query) === -1) {
740| return false;
741| }
742| }
743| if (pickerKind !== 'member') {
744| return true;
745| }
746| var cargo = normalizeLabel(pickerFilterCargo && pickerFilterCargo.value);
747| if (cargo && labelKey(item.position) !== labelKey(cargo)) {
748| return false;
749| }
750| var team = normalizeLabel(pickerFilterTeam && pickerFilterTeam.value);
751| if (team && !(item.team_names || []).some(function (name) {
752| return labelKey(name) === labelKey(team);
753| })) {
754| return false;
755| }
756| var bond = normalizeLabel(pickerFilterBond && pickerFilterBond.value);
757| if (bond && labelKey(bondLabel(item.employment_bond)) !== labelKey(bond)) {
758| return false;
759| }
760| return true;
761| }
762|
763| function closePickerAreaEditors(exceptWrap) {
764| if (!pickerBody) {
765| return;
766| }
767| Array.prototype.forEach.call(pickerBody.querySelectorAll('.gov-auth-picker-area.is-editing'), function (wrap) {
768| if (wrap !== exceptWrap && !wrap.classList.contains('is-limited')) {
769| wrap.classList.remove('is-editing');
770| }
771| });
772| }
773|
774| function setPickerRowAreas(row, allAreas, areaKeys, keepSelectOpen) {
775| allAreas = !!allAreas;
776| areaKeys = Array.isArray(areaKeys) ? areaKeys.map(normalizeLabel).filter(Boolean) : [];
777| if (allAreas || areaKeys.length === 0) {
778| allAreas = true;
779| areaKeys = [];
780| }
781| row.setAttribute('data-all-areas', allAreas ? '1' : '0');
782| var wrap = row.querySelector('.gov-auth-picker-area');
783| var select = row.querySelector('.gov-auth-picker-area-select');
784| if (wrap) {
785| Array.prototype.slice.call(wrap.querySelectorAll('.gov-auth-settings-chip')).forEach(function (chip) {
786| chip.remove();
787| });
788| if (!allAreas) {
789| areaKeys.forEach(function (key) {
790| wrap.insertBefore(
791| createChip(key, 'area:' + labelKey(key), { 'data-area-key': key }, true),
792| select
793| );
794| });
795| }
796| wrap.classList.toggle('is-limited', !allAreas);
797| if (allAreas && !keepSelectOpen) {
798| wrap.classList.remove('is-editing');
799| } else if (!allAreas) {
800| wrap.classList.add('is-editing');
801| }
802| }
803| rebuildPickerAreaSelect(row);
804| }
805|
806| function visiblePickerRows() {
807| if (!pickerBody) {
808| return [];
809| }
810| return Array.prototype.filter.call(pickerBody.querySelectorAll('tr[data-id]'), function (row) {
811| return row.style.display !== 'none';
812| });
813| }
814|
815| function syncPickerCheckAll() {
816| if (!pickerCheckAll) {
817| return;
818| }
819| var rows = visiblePickerRows();
820| var checked = rows.filter(function (row) {
821| var input = row.querySelector('input[type="checkbox"]');
822| return input && input.checked;
823| });
824| pickerCheckAll.checked = rows.length > 0 && checked.length === rows.length;
825| pickerCheckAll.indeterminate = checked.length > 0 && checked.length < rows.length;
826| }
827|
828| function applyPickerFilters() {
829| if (!pickerBody) {
830| return;
831| }
832| Array.prototype.forEach.call(pickerBody.querySelectorAll('tr[data-id]'), function (row) {
833| var item = {
834| name: row.getAttribute('data-name') || '',
835| email: row.getAttribute('data-email') || '',
836| position: row.getAttribute('data-position') || '',
837| team_names: (row.getAttribute('data-teams') || '').split('|').filter(Boolean),
838| employment_bond: row.getAttribute('data-bond') || ''
839| };
840| row.style.display = pickerMatchesFilters(item) ? '' : 'none';
841| });
842| var empty = pickerBody.querySelector('.gov-auth-picker-empty-row');
843| var anyVisible = visiblePickerRows().length > 0;
844| if (empty) {
845| empty.style.display = anyVisible ? 'none' : '';
846| }
847| syncPickerCheckAll();
848| }
849|
850| function renderPickerRows() {
851| if (!pickerBody) {
852| return;
853| }
854| pickerBody.innerHTML = '';
855| var items = pickerCatalog().filter(function (item) {
856| return item.id && !hasApproverRow(pickerKind, item.id);
857| });
858| if (items.length === 0) {
859| var emptyRow = document.createElement('tr');
860| emptyRow.className = 'gov-auth-picker-empty-row';
861| var emptyCell = document.createElement('td');
862| emptyCell.colSpan = 3;
863| emptyCell.className = 'gov-auth-picker-empty';
864| emptyCell.textContent = pickerKind === 'role'
865| ? 'Todos os cargos já foram adicionados.'
866| : 'Todos os membros já foram adicionados.';
867| emptyRow.appendChild(emptyCell);
868| pickerBody.appendChild(emptyRow);
869| syncPickerCheckAll();
870| return;
871| }
872|
873| items.forEach(function (item) {
874| var row = document.createElement('tr');
875| row.setAttribute('data-id', String(item.id));
876| row.setAttribute('data-name', item.name);
877| row.setAttribute('data-email', item.email || '');
878| row.setAttribute('data-position', item.position || '');
879| row.setAttribute('data-teams', (item.team_names || []).join('|'));
880| row.setAttribute('data-bond', item.employment_bond || '');
881| row.setAttribute('data-all-areas', '1');
882|
883| var checkCell = document.createElement('td');
884| checkCell.className = 'gov-auth-picker-check';
885| var checkbox = document.createElement('input');
886| checkbox.type = 'checkbox';
887| checkbox.setAttribute('aria-label', 'Selecionar ' + item.name);
888| checkCell.appendChild(checkbox);
889|
890| var nameCell = document.createElement('td');
891| var person = document.createElement('div');
892| person.className = 'gov-auth-picker-person';
893| var avatar = document.createElement('span');
894| avatar.className = 'gov-auth-picker-avatar';
895| avatar.style.background = avatarColor(item.name);
896| avatar.textContent = String(item.name || '?').charAt(0).toUpperCase();
897| var nameWrap = document.createElement('div');
898| nameWrap.className = 'gov-auth-picker-name';
899| var strong = document.createElement('strong');
900| strong.textContent = item.name;
901| nameWrap.appendChild(strong);
902| if (pickerKind === 'member' && item.email) {
903| var email = document.createElement('span');
904| email.textContent = item.email;
905| nameWrap.appendChild(email);
906| }
907| person.appendChild(avatar);
908| person.appendChild(nameWrap);
909| nameCell.appendChild(person);
910|
911| var areaCell = document.createElement('td');
912| var areaWrap = document.createElement('div');
913| areaWrap.className = 'gov-auth-picker-area';
914| var pill = document.createElement('button');
915| pill.type = 'button';
916| pill.className = 'gov-auth-picker-area-pill';
917| pill.textContent = ALL_AREAS_LABEL;
918| var areaSelect = document.createElement('select');
919| areaSelect.className = 'gov-auth-picker-area-select';
920| areaSelect.setAttribute('aria-label', 'Áreas de aplicação de ' + item.name);
921| areaWrap.appendChild(pill);
922| areaWrap.appendChild(areaSelect);
923| areaCell.appendChild(areaWrap);
924|
925| row.appendChild(checkCell);
926| row.appendChild(nameCell);
927| row.appendChild(areaCell);
928| pickerBody.appendChild(row);
929| setPickerRowAreas(row, true, []);
930| });
931|
932| var filterEmpty = document.createElement('tr');
933| filterEmpty.className = 'gov-auth-picker-empty-row';
934| filterEmpty.style.display = 'none';
935| var filterEmptyCell = document.createElement('td');
936| filterEmptyCell.colSpan = 3;
937| filterEmptyCell.className = 'gov-auth-picker-empty';
938| filterEmptyCell.textContent = 'Nenhum resultado para os filtros selecionados.';
939| filterEmpty.appendChild(filterEmptyCell);
940| pickerBody.appendChild(filterEmpty);
941|
942| applyPickerFilters();
943| }
944|
945| function resetPickerFilters() {
946| if (pickerSearch) {
947| pickerSearch.value = '';
948| }
949| if (pickerFilterCargo) {
950| pickerFilterCargo.value = '';
951| }
952| if (pickerFilterTeam) {
953| pickerFilterTeam.value = '';
954| }
955| if (pickerFilterBond) {
956| pickerFilterBond.value = '';
957| }
958| if (pickerCheckAll) {
959| pickerCheckAll.checked = false;
960| pickerCheckAll.indeterminate = false;
961| }
962| }
963|
964| function openApproverPicker(kind) {
965| pickerKind = kind === 'role' ? 'role' : 'member';
966| if (pickerFilters) {
967| pickerFilters.classList.toggle('d-none', pickerKind !== 'member');
968| }
969| fillPickerFilters();
970| resetPickerFilters();
971| renderPickerRows();
972| window.jQuery('#govAuthAddApproverModal').modal('show');
973| window.setTimeout(function () {
974| if (pickerSearch) {
975| pickerSearch.focus();
976| }
977| }, 200);
978| }
979|
980| function closeApproverPicker() {
981| window.jQuery('#govAuthAddApproverModal').modal('hide');
982| }
983|
984| function submitPicker() {
985| var selected = pickerBody
986| ? Array.prototype.filter.call(pickerBody.querySelectorAll('tr[data-id]'), function (row) {
987| var input = row.querySelector('input[type="checkbox"]');
988| return input && input.checked;
989| })
990| : [];
991| if (selected.length === 0) {
992| notifyError('Selecione pelo menos um aprovador.');
993| return;
994| }
995| selected.forEach(function (row) {
996| var allAreas = row.getAttribute('data-all-areas') !== '0';
997| var areaKeys = collectAreaKeys(row);
998| addApproverRow(
999| pickerKind,
1000| row.getAttribute('data-id'),
1001| row.getAttribute('data-name'),
1002| allAreas,
1003| allAreas ? [] : areaKeys,
1004| true
1005| );
1006| });
1007| closeApproverPicker();
1008| scheduleSave();
1009| }
1010|
1011| function hydrateAssignments(items, kind) {
1012| (items || []).forEach(function (item) {
1013| if (!item || !item.id) {
1014| return;
1015| }
1016| addApproverRow(
1017| kind,
1018| item.id,
1019| item.name || ((kind === 'member' ? 'Membro #' : 'Cargo #') + item.id),
1020| item.all_areas !== false,
1021| item.area_keys || []
1022| );
1023| });
1024| }
1025|
1026| if (typeInput && typeChips) {
1027| typeInput.addEventListener('keydown', function (event) {
1028| if (event.key !== 'Enter') {
1029| return;
1030| }
1031| event.preventDefault();
1032| addTypeChip(typeInput.value);
1033| typeInput.value = '';
1034| });
1035| typeChips.addEventListener('click', function (event) {
1036| var removeBtn = event.target.closest('.gov-auth-settings-chip__remove');
1037| if (!removeBtn) {
1038| return;
1039| }
1040| var chip = removeBtn.closest('.gov-auth-settings-chip');
1041| if (chip) {
1042| chip.remove();
1043| syncAllApproverAreaSelects();
1044| scheduleSave();
1045| }
1046| });
1047| }
1048|
1049| if (approverList) {
1050| approverList.addEventListener('click', function (event) {
1051| var removeBtn = event.target.closest('.gov-auth-settings-chip__remove');
1052| if (!removeBtn) {
1053| return;
1054| }
1055| var chip = removeBtn.closest('.gov-auth-settings-chip');
1056| var row = removeBtn.closest('.gov-auth-approver-row');
1057| if (!chip || !row) {
1058| return;
1059| }
1060| if (chip.classList.contains('gov-auth-approver-row__person')) {
1061| row.remove();
1062| scheduleSave();
1063| return;
1064| }
1065| var areaKey = chip.getAttribute('data-area-key');
1066| if (!areaKey) {
1067| return;
1068| }
1069| chip.remove();
1070| var kept = collectAreaKeys(row);
1071| setRowAreas(row, kept.length === 0, kept);
1072| scheduleSave();
1073| });
1074| approverList.addEventListener('change', function (event) {
1075| var select = event.target.closest('.gov-auth-approver-area-select');
1076| if (!select) {
1077| return;
1078| }
1079| var row = select.closest('.gov-auth-approver-row');
1080| var value = String(select.value || '').trim();
1081| if (!row || !value) {
1082| return;
1083| }
1084| if (value === ALL_AREAS_VALUE) {
1085| setRowAreas(row, true, []);
1086| scheduleSave();
1087| return;
1088| }
1089| var keys = collectAreaKeys(row);
1090| if (keys.every(function (key) { return labelKey(key) !== labelKey(value); })) {
1091| keys.push(normalizeLabel(value));
1092| }
1093| setRowAreas(row, false, keys);
1094| scheduleSave();
1095| });
1096| }
1097|
1098| bindOptionCard(membersOption, useMembers);
1099| bindOptionCard(rolesOption, useRoles);
1100| if (membersBtn) {
1101| membersBtn.addEventListener('click', function () {
1102| openApproverPicker('member');
1103| });
1104| }
1105| if (rolesBtn) {
1106| rolesBtn.addEventListener('click', function () {
1107| openApproverPicker('role');
1108| });
Note: Results truncated to 500 lines. Please narrow your line range.
Request #38
deepseek-v4-flash
P:39.36K C:113 CR:34.3K CW:0
1597ms
Reasoning
Let me read lines 1109-1224 for the end.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 1224, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig", "start_line": 1109}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig (Total lines: 1224)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1109-1224
1109| }
1110| if (pickerSearch) {
1111| pickerSearch.addEventListener('input', applyPickerFilters);
1112| }
1113| [pickerFilterCargo, pickerFilterTeam, pickerFilterBond].forEach(function (select) {
1114| if (select) {
1115| select.addEventListener('change', applyPickerFilters);
1116| }
1117| });
1118| if (pickerCheckAll) {
1119| pickerCheckAll.addEventListener('change', function () {
1120| visiblePickerRows().forEach(function (row) {
1121| var input = row.querySelector('input[type="checkbox"]');
1122| if (input) {
1123| input.checked = pickerCheckAll.checked;
1124| }
1125| });
1126| pickerCheckAll.indeterminate = false;
1127| });
1128| }
1129| if (pickerBody) {
1130| pickerBody.addEventListener('click', function (event) {
1131| var removeBtn = event.target.closest('.gov-auth-settings-chip__remove');
1132| if (removeBtn) {
1133| event.preventDefault();
1134| event.stopPropagation();
1135| var chip = removeBtn.closest('.gov-auth-settings-chip');
1136| var row = removeBtn.closest('tr[data-id]');
1137| if (!chip || !row) {
1138| return;
1139| }
1140| chip.remove();
1141| setPickerRowAreas(row, false, collectAreaKeys(row), true);
1142| return;
1143| }
1144| var pill = event.target.closest('.gov-auth-picker-area-pill');
1145| if (pill) {
1146| event.preventDefault();
1147| event.stopPropagation();
1148| var wrap = pill.closest('.gov-auth-picker-area');
1149| var select = wrap && wrap.querySelector('.gov-auth-picker-area-select');
1150| var row = pill.closest('tr');
1151| closePickerAreaEditors(wrap);
1152| if (wrap && select && row) {
1153| rebuildPickerAreaSelect(row);
1154| wrap.classList.add('is-editing');
1155| select.focus();
1156| }
1157| return;
1158| }
1159| if (event.target.closest('.gov-auth-picker-area')) {
1160| return;
1161| }
1162| var row = event.target.closest('tr[data-id]');
1163| if (!row || event.target.closest('input[type="checkbox"]')) {
1164| return;
1165| }
1166| var input = row.querySelector('input[type="checkbox"]');
1167| if (input) {
1168| input.checked = !input.checked;
1169| syncPickerCheckAll();
1170| }
1171| });
1172| pickerBody.addEventListener('change', function (event) {
1173| if (event.target.matches('input[type="checkbox"]')) {
1174| syncPickerCheckAll();
1175| return;
1176| }
1177| var select = event.target.closest('.gov-auth-picker-area-select');
1178| if (!select) {
1179| return;
1180| }
1181| var row = select.closest('tr[data-id]');
1182| var value = String(select.value || '').trim();
1183| if (!row || !value) {
1184| return;
1185| }
1186| if (value === ALL_AREAS_VALUE) {
1187| setPickerRowAreas(row, true, []);
1188| return;
1189| }
1190| var keys = collectAreaKeys(row);
1191| if (keys.every(function (key) { return labelKey(key) !== labelKey(value); })) {
1192| keys.push(normalizeLabel(value));
1193| }
1194| setPickerRowAreas(row, false, keys, true);
1195| var checkbox = row.querySelector('input[type="checkbox"]');
1196| if (checkbox) {
1197| checkbox.checked = true;
1198| syncPickerCheckAll();
1199| }
1200| });
1201| pickerBody.addEventListener('blur', function (event) {
1202| var select = event.target.closest('.gov-auth-picker-area-select');
1203| if (!select) {
1204| return;
1205| }
1206| window.setTimeout(function () {
1207| var wrap = select.closest('.gov-auth-picker-area');
1208| if (wrap && !wrap.classList.contains('is-limited') && !wrap.contains(document.activeElement)) {
1209| wrap.classList.remove('is-editing');
1210| }
1211| }, 120);
1212| }, true);
1213| }
1214| if (pickerSubmit) {
1215| pickerSubmit.addEventListener('click', submitPicker);
1216| }
1217| (initialTypes || []).forEach(addTypeChip);
1218| hydrateAssignments(initialApproverMembers, 'member');
1219| hydrateAssignments(initialApproverRoles, 'role');
1220| syncApproverMode();
1221| skipSave = false;
1222|})();
1223|</script>
1224|
Request #39
deepseek-v4-flash
P:40.78K C:1.47K CR:39.42K CW:0
12594ms
Reasoning
I've reviewed the full settings file. A few observations:
1. The picker "area" restriction edits only affect unsaved pending rows (selected checkboxes) — wait, actually the area chips in the picker modal determine areas for rows added when submitting. Good.
2. Notice subtle UX issue: In the picker modal, restricting area per row (limited). When adding a type chip from settings input, it doesn't sync picker selects unless modal is open; it does call syncAllApproverAreaSelects for approver rows but not picker rows (pick closed at that point; openApproverPicker → renderPickerRows rebuilds anyway). OK.
3. Bug potential: In the `change` listener for approver area select in settings rows, when choosing an area from select (adding a chip) calls setRowAreas(row, false, keys) which re-renders; that select is disabled when no types. OK.
4. On `fillAreaSelect` for approver rows: after re-selecting, the select value is set to '', but if all areas then it inserts an "all areas" chip and `row.setAttribute('data-all-areas','1')`. But `rebuildApproverAreaSelect` fills options; for all-areas rows, area chips show "Todas as Áreas" plus select with placeholder + all + types. Choosing types toggles limited. OK.
5. There's a possible bug: In `setPickerRowAreas`, when allAreas=true and the wrap is editing (`keepSelectOpen` param not passed for "all areas" selection in change handler), it removes chips then toggles classes. For "Todas as Áreas" selection in picker change, `setPickerRowAreas(row, true, [])` removes is-editing. Good.
6. `renderPickerRows` sets `filterEmpty` display none; `applyPickerFilters` handles show/hide. Fine.
7. `pickerBody` click: for a row in the modal where row has no checkbox... all rows have checkbox. Fine.
But note the checkAll handler toggles only `visiblePickerRows`. OK.
8. In `addTypeChip`, it calls `syncAllApproverAreaSelects` and scheduleSave; but when adding during initial hydration, skipSave true prevents saving and syncAllApproverAreaSelects has no rows yet. Fine. Then initial types get added in order; duplicates handled by labelKey case-insensitive. Good.
Now about skipSave and area rows hydration at end: `(initialTypes || []).forEach(addTypeChip); hydrateAssignments(...); syncApproverMode(); skipSave=false;` Actually wait: syncApproverMode() calls scheduleSave() at the end, but skipSave is still true at that point... Let me check the ordering:
```
(initialTypes || []).forEach(addTypeChip);
hydrateAssignments(initialApproverMembers, 'member');
hydrateAssignments(initialApproverRoles, 'role');
syncApproverMode();
skipSave = false;
```
skipSave is still true during syncApproverMode so scheduleSave returns early. Good. But after skipSave=false, no further save is triggered unless the user changes. OK. Note though initial types added via addTypeChip call syncAllApproverAreaSelects but approver rows don't exist yet at that point, then hydrateAssignments add approver rows, setRowAreas fills selects based on currentTypes() - correct. Good.
9. There's one real behavior bug: when user adds type chips that cause existing approver rows limited area chips to be filtered out. syncAllApproverAreaSelects handles removal of area keys not in allowed types. But when a TYPE is REMOVED, syncAllApproverAreaSelects is also called; it will keep areas still allowed and if none kept, setRowAreas(row, true...). If the removed type was used as limited area of an approver, the approver becomes all areas. Reasonable.
10. In the picker modal rows, `areaSelect` built with fillAreaSelect using currentTypes() and selectedKeys. When user picks multiple area values by selecting repeatedly from the same select and remaining chips toggle. OK.
Now concerning the review's god template issue; CSS is inline and repeated between the two new files. The chips styling duplicated (`#governance_auth_settings_content .gov-auth-settings-chip` vs `#govAuthAddApproverModal .gov-auth-settings-chip`). So duplication within this PR itself.
Additionally for `_modal_add_approver.html.twig`: note it includes a `<style>` block. And it's included from within `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` which itself has a `<style>` block at top. If the modal partial is included elsewhere, styles load there. OK.
Also note: `_modal_add_approver.html.twig` styles `#govAuthAddApproverModal .gov-auth-settings-chip__remove i { font-size: 10px; ... }`.
Let me now scan `_tab_authorizations_create` around the new diff positions (lines ~1999-2068) to precisely confirm payload fields.
Already looked. Now let me confirm `MV` semantics - `markAutCriarSelectInvalid`: gets `.aut-criar-modal-select-wrap` ancestor, but the actual `.custom-modern-select-trigger` inside that wrap — yes selectWrap includes wrapper. Good.
Let me now verify exact diff text lines for `index.html.twig` and the modal, to anchor comments.
For index.html.twig, tab visibility of settings - same permission as manage config. Given the create modal field visibility and the branch's rule, OK.
For the action-view button in create tab - new anchor lines 759-774.
Now let me also inspect the create tab diff for the section where AUT_REQ_TAG_CONFIG etc. appear, to check the payload - we already saw.
I want to quickly confirm `aut_modal_tipo_options` label options: uses aut_authorization_types in the template. In the index diff, when config tab renders the settings uses aut_authorization_types default [] too.
Now look at `_custom_select.html.twig` to confirm usage pattern of options & selected_value & id & name & label params; and to see how the wrapper markup `custom-modern-select-wrapper`, `custom-modern-select-trigger`, options are generated - to ensure `autCriarArea` sets `.custom-modern-select-trigger`? Also confirm id maps as expected. Read partial file.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "templates/components/ui/_custom_select.html.twig", "start_line": 1, "end_line": 120}
Result
File: templates/components/ui/_custom_select.html.twig (Total lines: 123)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-120
1|{# templates/components/ui/_custom_select.html.twig #}
2|{#
3| Custom select component.
4|
5| Styles are loaded from:
6| - public/css/metahuman-standard/features/header-actions.css
7| - public/css/metahuman-standard/components/_custom_select.css
8| - public/css/metahuman-standard/features/new-buttons.css
9|
10| JavaScript is loaded from:
11| - public/js/metahuman-standard/components/_custom_select.js
12|
13| Optional:
14| - title: tooltip text on hover
15| - sortable: when true, enables asc/desc/clear cycle on label click (chevron still opens menu)
16|#}
17|
18|{% set _cs_sortable = sortable|default(false) %}
19|{% set _cs_label = label|default('Select an option') %}
20|{% set _cs_loading_enabled = loading_enabled|default(false) %}
21|{% set _cs_loading_text = loading_text|default('Carregando') %}
22|{% if selected_value is defined and selected_value is not empty %}
23| {% for option in options %}
24| {% if option.value == selected_value %}{% set _cs_label = option.text %}{% endif %}
25| {% endfor %}
26|{% endif %}
27|
28|<div class="custom-modern-select-wrapper"
29| data-loading-enabled="{{ _cs_loading_enabled ? '1' : '0' }}"
30| data-loading-text="{{ _cs_loading_text }}"
31| {% if _cs_sortable %}data-sortable="true" data-placeholder-label="{{ _cs_label }}"{% endif %}
32| {% if title is defined and title %} title="{{ title }}"{% endif %}>
33| <div class="custom-modern-select">
34| <button type="button" class="select-btn custom-modern-select-trigger">
35| {% if _cs_sortable %}
36| <span class="custom-modern-select-label-group">
37| <span class="custom-modern-select-label">{{ _cs_label }}</span>
38| <span class="custom-modern-select-direction" aria-hidden="true" style="display: none;"></span>
39| </span>
40| {% else %}
41| <span class="custom-modern-select-label">{{ _cs_label }}</span>
42| {% endif %}
43| {% if _cs_loading_enabled %}
44| <span class="custom-modern-select-loading" aria-hidden="true" style="display:none;">
45| <i class="fas fa-spinner fa-spin"></i>
46| <em>{{ _cs_loading_text }}</em>
47| </span>
48| {% endif %}
49| <i class="fas fa-chevron-down custom-modern-select-chevron custom-modern-select-icon"></i>
50| </button>
51| <div class="custom-modern-options">
52| {% for option in options %}
53| <div class="custom-modern-option{% if selected_value is defined and option.value == selected_value %} selected{% endif %}" data-value="{{ option.value }}">{{ option.text }}</div>
54| {% endfor %}
55| </div>
56| </div>
57| <select name="{{ name }}" id="{{ id }}" class="custom-modern-select-hidden" style="display:none;">
58| {% for option in options %}
59| <option value="{{ option.value }}"{% if selected_value is defined and option.value == selected_value %} selected{% endif %}>{{ option.text }}</option>
60| {% endfor %}
61| </select>
62|</div>
63|
64|<script>
65|(function () {
66| window.initAllCustomSelectWrappers = function () {
67| if (typeof window.initCustomSelects === 'function') {
68| window.initCustomSelects();
69| }
70| };
71|
72| /**
73| * Toggles the optional loading state for a _custom_select instance.
74| * @param {string} id - Native hidden select ID (without #)
75| * @param {boolean} isLoading - Whether the select should show loading UI
76| * @param {string} [text] - Optional loading label override
77| */
78| window.setCustomSelectLoading = function (id, isLoading, text) {
79| var el = document.getElementById(id);
80| if (!el) { return; }
81| var wrapper = el.closest('.custom-modern-select-wrapper');
82| if (!wrapper || wrapper.getAttribute('data-loading-enabled') !== '1') { return; }
83|
84| var trigger = wrapper.querySelector('.custom-modern-select-trigger');
85| var customSelect = wrapper.querySelector('.custom-modern-select');
86| var loadingText = wrapper.querySelector('.custom-modern-select-loading em');
87|
88| if (loadingText && text) {
89| loadingText.textContent = text;
90| } else if (loadingText) {
91| loadingText.textContent = wrapper.getAttribute('data-loading-text') || 'Carregando';
92| }
93|
94| wrapper.classList.toggle('is-loading', !!isLoading);
95|
96| /* Garantia via inline-style: o display:none no CSS pode ser sobrescrito por outras
97| regras; aqui usamos style direto para ser sempre determinístico. */
98| var loadingSpan = wrapper.querySelector('.custom-modern-select-loading');
99| var labelSpan = wrapper.querySelector('.custom-modern-select-label');
100| var chevronEl = wrapper.querySelector('.custom-modern-select-chevron');
101| if (loadingSpan) { loadingSpan.style.display = isLoading ? 'inline-flex' : 'none'; }
102| if (labelSpan) { labelSpan.style.display = isLoading ? 'none' : ''; }
103| if (chevronEl) { chevronEl.style.display = isLoading ? 'none' : ''; }
104|
105| if (customSelect) {
106| customSelect.classList.remove('open');
107| }
108| if (trigger) {
109| trigger.disabled = !!isLoading;
110| if (isLoading) {
111| trigger.setAttribute('aria-busy', 'true');
112| } else {
113| trigger.removeAttribute('aria-busy');
114| }
115| }
116|
117| if (!isLoading && typeof window.setCustomSelectValue === 'function') {
118| window.setCustomSelectValue(id, el.value);
119| }
120| };
Request #40
deepseek-v4-flash
P:43.8K C:848 CR:42.24K CW:0
7535ms
Reasoning
Confirmed component structure: select hidden has class custom-modern-select-hidden and wrapper `.custom-modern-select-wrapper`.
Let me double-check one functional detail regarding `syncAutCriarSelectFromCustomUi` usage before render (i.e., the diff shows it's used at multiple places; in `readAutCriarSelectValue` etc.). This matches.
Now I have enough. But let me verify a subtle behavior point in `ensureAutCriarSelectOption` for edit of existing authorizations: they append options to the wrapper .custom-modern-options but use `.closest('.custom-modern-select-wrapper').find(...)` - but note `ensureAutCriarSelectOption` appends to wrapper options box after the select element? Actually the option is appended to `$select` (the hidden select) and to optionsBox (custom UI). If `$select` has `style=display:none`, appending to `$select.find('option')` works. And `$optionsBox.append` mirrors it. But setAutCriarSelectValue then calls `setAutCriarCustomSelectValueSilent`. Whatever. Fine.
There's a subtle bug possibility: `ensureAutCriarSelectOption` is invoked BEFORE `setAutCriarSelectValue`, and `options` element is appended to the wrapper AFTER `.custom-modern-options`; but the wrapper for areaId is always in the modal. OK.
Now, check the fallback values used in `applyAutCriarModalFields`:
```
var areaId = aut.area_id || aut.area_responsavel_id || (aut.area && aut.area.id) || '';
var aprovadorId = aut.aprovador_id || (aut.aprovador && aut.aprovador.id) || '';
var aprovadorRoleId = aut.aprovador_role_id || (aut.aprovador_role && aut.aprovador_role.id) || '';
var tipo = aut.tipo || aut.tipo_autorizacao || '';
```
Given old rows have null values, areaId = '' → ensureAutCriarSelectOption not added, set value '' → good.
Question: does the endpoint that opens modal include these fields? Unknown to us. We'll leave this as a "confirm contract" item.
Now I've verified the needed context for the main comment anchors. Let me verify the code_search results for ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers to pin down line numbers (previously shown lines 2419-2420 in the current file). Let me also confirm the create-tab file has no other new `|raw` with user data beyond this.
Let me double check other json_encode raw occurrences within the create file diff: none new.
Now, one more area: the two big new files will cause a huge code-comment. We'll write a single comment for each file with a detailed, ordered body: god template high; CSRF; CSS duplication; component reuse; visibility of Visualizar button in create tab; field contract; autosave loss; JSON raw; empty function.
Let me also anchor the create-tab autosave (persist) comment precisely and re-verify text of the lines.
Let me do final code_search for the anchors to confirm exact lines:
- csrf_token in _modal_authorization_form (other modal save endpoints).
- ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers occurrences.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["templates/"], "search_text": "ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers"}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig
Match lines: 1
2419| window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers = function () {
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig
Match lines: 2
589| if (typeof window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers === 'function') {
590| window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers(res.approver_members || payload.approver_members);
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig"], "search_text": "csrf"}
Result
No matches found
Request #41
deepseek-v4-flash
P:44.78K C:186 CR:44.54K CW:0
1997ms
Reasoning
The modal authorization form includes no csrf anywhere. Let me check the other modals in create tab for csrf. Search csrf within the create tab file.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig"], "search_text": "csrf"}
Result
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["templates/governance/authorization/partials/"], "search_text": "authorizationSave|\\.ajax\\(|csrf"}
Result
No matches found
Request #42
deepseek-v4-flash
P:44.99K C:160 CR:44.93K CW:0
2329ms
Reasoning
Hmm, `csrf` not in create tab. Where does the actual creation save go? Look for `btnSalvarAdicionarAut` handler → `window.authorizationSave(payload...)` presumably. Search in create tab for the call after payload building at ~2061-2080.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 2110, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig", "start_line": 2061}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig (Total lines: 2423)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 2061-2110
2061| descricao: descricao,
2062| requisitos: requisitos,
2063| contractor_requirement_dependencies: getAutCriarContractorReqsFromTags(),
2064| responsavel_id: responsavelId,
2065| area_id: areaId,
2066| aprovador_id: aprovadorId || null,
2067| aprovador_role_id: aprovadorRoleId || null,
2068| tipo: tipo
2069| };
2070| if (id) {
2071| payload.status = $('#autCriarStatusPreserve').val() || 'ativa';
2072| }
2073|
2074| $.ajax({
2075| url: SALVAR_URL,
2076| method: 'POST',
2077| contentType: 'application/json; charset=UTF-8',
2078| dataType: 'json',
2079| data: JSON.stringify(payload)
2080| }).done(function (res) {
2081| if (!res || !res.success) {
2082| var msg = (res && res.message) ? res.message : 'Não foi possível salvar.';
2083| if (typeof showToast === 'function') showToast(msg, 'Erro', 'fas fa-times', 'bg-danger');
2084| else alert(msg);
2085| return;
2086| }
2087| $('#modalAdicionarAut').modal('hide');
2088| if (res.aut && res.aut.id != null) {
2089| AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG[String(res.aut.id)] = res.aut;
2090| }
2091| if (typeof showToast === 'function') showToast(res.message || 'Salvo.', 'Sucesso', 'fas fa-check', 'bg-success');
2092| setTimeout(reloadPage, 400);
2093| }).fail(function (xhr) {
2094| var msg = 'Erro ao salvar.';
2095| try { var j = xhr.responseJSON; if (j && j.message) msg = j.message; } catch (e) {}
2096| if (typeof showToast === 'function') showToast(msg, 'Erro', 'fas fa-times', 'bg-danger');
2097| else alert(msg);
2098| }).always(function () {
2099| setLoading(false);
2100| });
2101| });
2102|
2103| /* ── Ativar / inativar ── */
2104| $(document).on('click', '.js-aut-criar-toggle-status', function (e) {
2105| e.preventDefault();
2106| var $btn = $(this);
2107| var autId = $btn.data('aut-id');
2108| var isActive = String($btn.data('aut-active')) === '1';
2109|
2110| if (isActive) {
Request #43
deepseek-v4-flash
P:45.87K C:795 CR:45.06K CW:0
6937ms
Reasoning
So the create/update AJAX uses $.ajax JSON.stringify payload (SALVAR_URL) with no csrf either, as existing pattern. New fields area_id etc appended (lines 2065-2068).
Now let me anchor the payload comment at lines 2065-2068.
Now let me re-read lines around 1216-1220 (ensure ids) to confirm `AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS` doesn't include autCriarRequisitoAdd — yes it's 'autCriarArea','autCriarResponsavel','autCriarAprovador','autCriarAprovadorRole','autCriarTipo'.
Now examine `setAutCriarModalReadonly` disables `#autCriarArea, #autCriarAprovador, #autCriarAprovadorRole, #autCriarTipo`. What about `#autCriarResponsavel`? Also disabled. OK.
Wait, one critical issue in `setAutCriarModalReadonly` — it also disables selects via `.prop('disabled', readonly)`. For read-only visualization of an existing autorização with an area/tipo not present in options, `ensureAutCriarSelectOption` will add them only if they exist; fine. But if the current select options list for autCriarTipo has the value, OK.
Let me now double-check that `markAutCriarSelectInvalid` with MV correctly highlights — not a bug worth commenting on.
Now another subtlety: In modal creation save, they removed the old check order so `descricao` check occurs after requisitos. In the diff, that's fine.
Also note `tipo` validation only non-empty, but `autCriarTipo` type options include only registered types; but existing old auths may have tipo NULL; editing requires selecting; that's consistent with edit requiring area & tipo to be filled since they're mandatory.
But there's an issue: For EDIT of an existing authorization created before this feature, area_id and tipo are NULL. When editing, applyAutCriarModalFields sets area/tipo to '' and the form will show empty required selects; saving requires selecting values. That means editing old autorizações forces the user to pick area+tipo; probably intended. Not a bug.
Now, I will verify what backend save route is used for modal (SALVAR_URL defined earlier in create tab). Not needed.
Let's now focus to check the "Visualizar" action (view permission). Also confirm whether the modal can be opened only from create tab's table which renders regardless of the permission (the create tab renders always? Actually in index.html.twig, tab_auth_criacao tab rendered where? In tab "Autorizações"? If ssmaCanCreateAuthorization false, tab hidden but still included in DOM? In index diff, the settings div is inside the `ssmaCanManageConfig` block. The create-tab's inclusion in index page probably within some permission wrapper; can't tell. But we can search for include of `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig`.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["templates/"], "search_text": "_tab_authorizations_create"}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig
Match lines: 1
59| {% include 'governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig' %}
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["templates/"], "search_text": "js-aut-criar-visualizar"}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_authorization_card.html.twig
Match lines: 1
33| class="dropdown-item js-aut-criar-visualizar"
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig
Match lines: 2
763| class: 'btn-default btn-sm ssma-aqc-table-action-btn js-aut-criar-visualizar',
1941| $(document).on('click', '.js-aut-criar-visualizar', function (e) {
Request #44
deepseek-v4-flash
P:46.85K C:167 CR:46.59K CW:0
2258ms
Reasoning
The create tab is included at line 59 of index.html.twig. Let's see surrounding context of index.html.twig to know permission wrap. Actually index diff shows settings included inside `{% if ssmaCanManageConfig|default(false) %}` around line 40-70. The create tab include is line 59 likely inside the same if block? Let's check.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 130, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig", "start_line": 1}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig (Total lines: 208)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-130
1|{% extends user_uses_admin_hub_shell() ? 'layoutAdmin.html.twig' : 'layoutUser.html.twig' %}
2|
3|{% block headercss %}
4| {{ parent() }}
5| <link rel="stylesheet" href="{{ asset('css/governance/governance-authorization.css') }}?v=202606120">
6| <link rel="stylesheet" href="{{ asset('css/governance/governance-hub-layout.css') }}?v=202606121">
7| <link rel="stylesheet" href="{{ asset('css/metahuman-standard/components/_modal_offcanvas.css') }}">
8| <link rel="stylesheet" href="{{ asset('css/ssma/detail-offcanvas-readonly.css') }}?v=202605283">
9| <link rel="stylesheet" href="{{ asset('css/governance/governance-authorization-detail-offcanvas.css') }}?v=202606110">
10| <link rel="stylesheet" href="{{ asset('css/governance/governance-modal-form.css') }}?v=202606113">
11|{% endblock %}
12|
13|{% block container %}
14|<section class="members-content zero-padding modern-layout hub-module-layout ssma-module ssma-autorizacoes-index governance-authorization-page governance-hub-page">
15| {% include 'ssma/partials/_shared_module_assets.html.twig' with {
16| allMembers: allMembers|default([]),
17| ssmaIncludeBodyMapAssets: false
18| } %}
19|
20| {% set autorizacaoTabs = [] %}
21| {% if ssmaCanCreateAuthorization|default(false) %}
22| {% set autorizacaoTabs = autorizacaoTabs|merge([
23| {'id': 'tab_auth_criar', 'label': 'Criação de Autorizações', 'target_div': 'tab_auth_criar_content'}
24| ]) %}
25| {% endif %}
26| {% if ssmaCanManageConfig|default(false) %}
27| {% set autorizacaoTabs = autorizacaoTabs|merge([
28| {'id': 'tab_auth_requisitos', 'label': 'Criação de Requisitos', 'target_div': 'tab_auth_requisitos_content'},
29| {'id': 'tab_auth_configuracoes', 'label': 'Configurações', 'target_div': 'tab_auth_configuracoes_content'}
30| ]) %}
31| {% endif %}
32| {% if ssmaCanManagePermissions|default(false) %}
33| {% set autorizacaoTabs = autorizacaoTabs|merge([
34| {'id': 'tab_auth_permissao', 'label': 'Permissões', 'target_div': 'tab_auth_permissao_content'}
35| ]) %}
36| {% endif %}
37|
38| {% set defaultAutTab = autorizacaoTabs|length > 0 ? (autorizacaoTabs|first).id : 'tab_auth_criar' %}
39|
40| <div class="modern-header{% if autorizacaoTabs|length <= 1 %} no-tabs{% endif %}">
41| <div class="header-top">
42| <h1 class="header-title">Autorizações & Requisitos</h1>
43| </div>
44|
45| {% if autorizacaoTabs|length > 1 %}
46| {% include 'components/ui/_tabs.html.twig' with {
47| tabs_id: 'autorizacao_tabs',
48| use_existing_divs: true,
49| default_tab: defaultAutTab,
50| tabs: autorizacaoTabs
51| } %}
52| {% endif %}
53| </div>
54|
55| {% if ssmaCanCreateAuthorization|default(false) %}
56| <div id="tab_auth_criar_content"
57| class="tab-panel"
58| style="display:{% if defaultAutTab == 'tab_auth_criar' %}block{% else %}none{% endif %};">
59| {% include 'governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig' %}
60| </div>
61| {% endif %}
62|
63| {% if ssmaCanManageConfig|default(false) %}
64| <div id="tab_auth_requisitos_content"
65| class="tab-panel"
66| style="display:{% if defaultAutTab == 'tab_auth_requisitos' %}block{% else %}none{% endif %};">
67| {% include 'governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_config.html.twig' %}
68| </div>
69|
70| <div id="tab_auth_configuracoes_content"
71| class="tab-panel"
72| style="display:{% if defaultAutTab == 'tab_auth_configuracoes' %}block{% else %}none{% endif %};">
73| {% include 'governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig' %}
74| </div>
75| {% endif %}
76|
77| {% if ssmaCanManagePermissions|default(false) %}
78| <div id="tab_auth_permissao_content"
79| class="tab-panel governance-authorization-permissions-tab"
80| style="display:{% if defaultAutTab == 'tab_auth_permissao' %}block{% else %}none{% endif %};">
81| {% include 'ssma/partials/_tab_permissions.html.twig' with {
82| ssmaPermissionProduct: 'ssma-authorization',
83| ssmaPermissionTabId: 'gov_auth_permissions'
84| } %}
85| </div>
86| {% endif %}
87|</section>
88|{% include 'components/_modal_confirm_multiple.html.twig' %}
89|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_deactivate.html.twig' %}
90|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_reactivate.html.twig' %}
91|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_in_use.html.twig' %}
92|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_delete.html.twig' %}
93|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_delete_blocked.html.twig' %}
94|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_delete.html.twig' %}
95|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_in_use.html.twig' %}
96|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_delete_blocked.html.twig' %}
97|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_deactivate.html.twig' %}
98|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_reactivate.html.twig' %}
99|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_form.html.twig' %}
100|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_offcanvas_requirement_detail.html.twig' %}
101|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_offcanvas_authorization_detail.html.twig' %}
102|{% include 'ssma/partials/_modal_delete_confirm.html.twig' %}
103|{% endblock %}
104|
105|{% block javascripts %}
106| {% include 'governance/partials/_hub_component_assets.html.twig' %}
107| {{ parent() }}
108| <script src="{{ asset('js/metahuman-standard/components/_modal_offcanvas.js') }}"></script>
109| <script>
110| (function () {
111| function hoistGovAuthDetailOffcanvasToBody() {
112| var wrapper = document.getElementById('govAuthDetail-offcanvas-wrapper');
113| var offcanvasModal = document.getElementById('govAuthDetail');
114| if (wrapper && wrapper.parentNode !== document.body) {
115| document.body.appendChild(wrapper);
116| }
117| if (offcanvasModal && offcanvasModal.parentNode !== document.body) {
118| document.body.appendChild(offcanvasModal);
119| }
120|
121| var condWrapper = document.getElementById('govAuthCondDetail-offcanvas-wrapper');
122| var condOffcanvasModal = document.getElementById('govAuthCondDetail');
123| if (condWrapper && condWrapper.parentNode !== document.body) {
124| document.body.appendChild(condWrapper);
125| }
126| if (condOffcanvasModal && condOffcanvasModal.parentNode !== document.body) {
127| document.body.appendChild(condOffcanvasModal);
128| }
129| }
130|
Request #45
deepseek-v4-flash
P:49.07K C:281 CR:46.98K CW:0
2931ms
Reasoning
Confirmed:
- `_modal_authorization_form.html.twig` is only included within `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig` (need to confirm it's included from there), which is rendered only when `ssmaCanCreateAuthorization`. So the modal HTML and its JS runs only if user can create authorization. But there's a `_authorization_card.html.twig` also using `.js-aut-criar-visualizar`; where is the card used? Could be in another context. But modal is only rendered under canCreate. Given requirement, users without canCreate can't see the modal? Wait but modal `_modal_authorization_form` is included in create tab template (line ~?). Let's search for include in create tab.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig"], "search_text": "_modal_authorization_form"}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig
Match lines: 2
14| - governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig
899|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig' with {
file_find
Show Details
Arguments
{"query_name": "governance/authorization"}
Result
templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/monitoring.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_authorization_card.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_empty_state_authorizations.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_empty_state_requirements.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_mobile_fabs.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_add_approver.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_apply_authorization.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_block_member.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_deactivate.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_delete.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_delete_blocked.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_in_use.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_reactivate.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_extend_validity.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_remove_authorization.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_deactivate.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_delete.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_delete_blocked.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_form.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_in_use.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_reactivate.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_send_notification.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_monitoring_actions_menu.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_monitoring_panel.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_monitoring_row_actions.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_offcanvas_apply_authorization_monitoring.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_offcanvas_authorization_detail.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_offcanvas_authorization_detail_body.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_offcanvas_member_profile_monitoring.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_offcanvas_requirement_detail.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_offcanvas_requirement_detail_body.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/partials/_offcanvas_view_authorization_monitoring.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_config.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_monitoring.html.twig templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig
Request #46
deepseek-v4-flash
P:50.25K C:594 CR:49.28K CW:0
5830ms
Reasoning
The modal authorization form is included only from the create tab (line 899), which is rendered only when `ssmaCanCreateAuthorization` is true. So moving the visualizar button outside of `ssmaCanCreateAuthorization` means when ssmaCanCreateAuthorization false, the create tab is not rendered at all, so there's no table and no visualizar button. So issue #3 is moot: the table is inside create tab which only renders with canCreate. So the button visibility change is a no-op practically? Wait, but the create tab itself renders only under canCreate; users without canCreate don't see the tab or any table. So moving the visualizar action outside the canCreate block within that table doesn't expose to users who lack canCreate. So issue #3 likely isn't a real exposure; the diff change may be irrelevant/unneeded, but not a security issue.
Hold on—there might be monitoring tab and card list where the visualizar action appears regardless. The monitoring partial `_authorization_card` also has js-aut-criar-visualizar but that's separate and rendered elsewhere (maybe within same page if canManage). Anyway, within this diff's table, only visible when canCreate, so the change is cosmetic: previously if canCreate false, actions column had... well the tab won't render anyway. So this isn't a security concern. I'll drop issue #3 or downgrade to "no practical effect" - but better drop entirely. Actually the visualizar button is also used elsewhere? In `_authorization_card.html.twig` the visualizar is for monitoring tab cards probably. Fine.
Now, the important thing I should check: whether the create tab is rendered on the monitoring page or other places where the modal partial might be missing the new variables; the modal is included only in the create tab within index (canCreate). Since index passes aut_company_areas etc. via the controller hub (SSMA hub includes governance?), likely all needed vars are passed. But `_tab_authorizations_create` might also be included elsewhere with different variable context. Let me search other includes of it (only one, in index). Good.
Now `_modal_authorization_form` include at create tab line 899. Let's read around lines 890-910 to see the variable passing to that include (allMembers etc.), and lines 1-40 of the create tab.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 915, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig", "start_line": 890}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig (Total lines: 2423)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 890-915
890| description: 'Ajuste os filtros ou a busca para visualizar outros resultados.'
891| } %}
892| </div>
893|
894| {% endif %}
895|
896|</div>
897|
898|{# ── Modal Criar / Editar autorização — Figma #}
899|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig' with {
900| allMembers: allMembers|default([]),
901| aut_conditions_active: aut_conditions_active
902|} %}
903|
904|{# ── JavaScript ── #}
905|<script>
906|(function () {
907| 'use strict';
908|
909| var SALVAR_URL = {{ path('governance_authorization_save')|json_encode|raw }};
910| /* Placeholder numérico (casa com \d+ exigido pelas rotas). Substituído via .replace no JS. */
911| var REMOVER_URL_TPL = {{ path('governance_authorization_remove', {id: 999999999})|json_encode|raw }};
912| var USAGE_URL_TPL = {{ path('governance_authorization_usage', {id: 999999999})|json_encode|raw }};
913| var DEACTIVATE_URL_TPL = {{ path('governance_authorization_deactivate', {id: 999999999})|json_encode|raw }};
914| var ACTIVATE_URL_TPL = {{ path('governance_authorization_activate', {id: 999999999})|json_encode|raw }};
915| var DETAIL_URL_TPL = {{ path('governance_authorization_detail', {id: 999999999})|json_encode|raw }};
Request #47
deepseek-v4-flash
P:51.31K C:574 CR:50.82K CW:0
5716ms
Reasoning
Include at line 899 only passes `allMembers` and `aut_conditions_active`. But the modal (new code) also uses `aut_company_roles`, `aut_company_areas`, `aut_authorization_types`. Since the include does not pass them, they'll be resolved from the parent/global Twig context of the create tab page — which inherits from the page context of index.html.twig (the controller). Since `allMembers` is passed explicitly but aut_company_roles/areas/types are not, presumably available in the global context if controller passes them. In Twig, an include's inner scope can still access global variables of the template that includes it when not passed. Yes, includes inherit current context by default (unless `only`). So if the controller provides those variables, they'll be available.
But wait — the settings tab uses these variables, too (aut_authorization_types etc.). Since settings tab included in index.html.twig. Both rely on controller. The hub injection is described: "Hub injeta aut_authorization_types, aprovadores e cargos da empresa na view". OK.
But if this modal partial is included anywhere else with different context (it's only included in create tab), no issue.
Now let me confirm create tab is only under canCreate and thus the "visualizar" button change has no exposure. So drop issue #3.
But wait: monitoring page? There's `monitoring.html.twig` which includes `_tab_authorizations_monitoring`. The create tab isn't there. So only index includes create tab. OK.
Also confirm the settings CSS and JS duplication is within PR. Yes.
Let me double-check the actual variable names in the controller: aut_company_areas etc. But out of review scope.
Next issue #4: modal's edit path depends on backend returning new fields in DETAIL response. Given backend in branch (not present in our diff), we should verify the create tab uses `AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG` objects. Where do they come from? Let's search how the table data is populated, what fields aut objects have (area etc.). Look at creation catalog data - where data rows built? Search 'area_id' in create file.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig"], "search_text": "area_id|area_responsavel_id|aprovador_id|aprovador_role_id|tipo_autorizacao"}
Result
No matches found
Request #48
deepseek-v4-flash
P:51.9K C:361 CR:51.84K CW:0
3358ms
Reasoning
No matches in create tab aside from what we saw earlier? Actually we saw area_id in the payload section (line 2065). The code_search probably returned nothing due to regex pattern issue? Search separate literal.
Wait, the earlier code_search for 'aprovador_role_id' returned matches at 2067 etc. Because search may be case-insensitive and exact literal. Here pattern uses | alternation which is regex only when use_perl_regexp is true. So it treated as literal string with pipes and didn't match. Need proper regex.
Let me search for 'aut.area' and 'tipo_autorizacao' in the create tab diff region... We already saw applyAutCriarModalFields added referencing aut.area_id etc. That's inside the file, so code_search would find 'area_id' substring... unless those lines are from applyAutCriarModalFields which we saw in diff around 1700. Let me search literally 'area_id'.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig"], "search_text": "area_id"}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig Match lines: 2 1720| var areaId = aut.area_id || aut.area_responsavel_id || (aut.area && aut.area.id) || ''; 2065| area_id: areaId,
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig"], "search_text": "tipo_autorizacao"}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig Match lines: 1 1723| var tipo = aut.tipo || aut.tipo_autorizacao || '';
Request #49
deepseek-v4-flash
P:52.4K C:186 CR:52.22K CW:0
2372ms
Reasoning
So the create tab render of table rows (populated from AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG presumably built from data-aut JSON attributes or from initial table rows server rendered with aut fields). We need to know if `aut` objects from server include `area`, `aprovador` etc. Let's search for where AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG is filled, e.g., search "AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG".
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig"], "search_text": "AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG"}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig
Match lines: 4
916| var AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG = (function (list) {
1679| if (autId && AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG[String(autId)]) {
1680| return $.extend(true, {}, AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG[String(autId)]);
2089| AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG[String(res.aut.id)] = res.aut;
Request #50
deepseek-v4-flash
P:52.72K C:120 CR:52.48K CW:0
1982ms
Reasoning
Read around 916-960 to see the data source of catalog (autCriarCatalog data-aut json).
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 970, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig", "start_line": 916}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig (Total lines: 2423)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 916-970
916| var AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG = (function (list) {
917| var map = {};
918| (list || []).forEach(function (aut) {
919| if (aut && aut.id != null) {
920| map[String(aut.id)] = aut;
921| }
922| });
923| return map;
924| })({{ aut_all|json_encode|raw }});
925|
926| var autLastUsageDetails = null;
927|
928| function autFormatAuthorizationUsageMessage(res, fallback) {
929| if (!res || !res.blocking_summary) {
930| return fallback || '';
931| }
932|
933| return 'Esta autorização possui vínculos ativos: ' + res.blocking_summary + '. '
934| + 'Verifique a aba Monitoramento — vínculos fora do seu escopo aparecem como '
935| + '"Colaborador fora do escopo". Remova os vínculos no perfil do colaborador '
936| + 'ou marque a autorização como Inativa antes de excluir.';
937| }
938|
939| function autApplyAuthorizationUsageMessage(res, selector, fallback) {
940| var $target = $(selector);
941| if (!$target.length) {
942| return;
943| }
944| $target.text(autFormatAuthorizationUsageMessage(res, fallback || $target.text()));
945| }
946|
947| var govAuthDetailAutId = null;
948| var pendingAutCriarFill = null;
949|
950| function readAutCriarAutId($el) {
951| if (!$el || !$el.length) {
952| return 0;
953| }
954| var raw = $el.attr('data-aut-id');
955| if (!raw) {
956| raw = $el.data('autId');
957| }
958| if (!raw) {
959| raw = $el.closest('[data-aut-id]').attr('data-aut-id');
960| }
961| return parseInt(raw, 10) || 0;
962| }
963|
964| function hoistGovAuthDetailOffcanvasToBody() {
965| var wrapper = document.getElementById('govAuthDetail-offcanvas-wrapper');
966| var offcanvasModal = document.getElementById('govAuthDetail');
967| if (wrapper && wrapper.parentNode !== document.body) {
968| document.body.appendChild(wrapper);
969| }
970| if (offcanvasModal && offcanvasModal.parentNode !== document.body) {
Request #51
deepseek-v4-flash
P:53.47K C:280 CR:52.74K CW:0
2910ms
Reasoning
The `aut_all` server-rendered JSON array is the catalog (probably serialized full auths incl. requisitos). So edit/visualizar relies on `aut_all` including new fields. Let's search where aut_all is set in src controller for the hub (GovernanceController hub) and confirm the JSON includes new fields, or find how aut is serialized. Since the controller isn't in the review group, but this is a cross-file contract observation: the JS in the reviewed file expects area_id/tipo/aprovador_id/aprovador_role_id in the aut_all objects. If backend serialization doesn't include those keys, edit modal can't fill. Let's check src quickly for the hub rendering index and JSON fields. Search 'aut_all'.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/"], "search_text": "aut_all"}
Result
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php Match lines: 2 1303| 'aut_all' => [], 3343| 'aut_all' => $autAll, File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php Match lines: 3 724| 'aut_all' => [], 2465| // aut_all — one entry per authorization (for "Criação" card grid) 2513| 'aut_all' => $autAll,
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/"], "search_text": "aut_company_roles"}
Result
File: src/Controller/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController.php
Match lines: 1
48| 'company_roles' => $view['aut_company_roles'],
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery.php
Match lines: 3
26| * aut_company_roles: list<array{id: int, name: string}>,
38| 'aut_company_roles' => [],
50| * aut_company_roles: list<array{id: int, name: string}>,
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigService.php
Match lines: 2
37| * aut_company_roles: list<array{id: int, name: string}>
55| 'aut_company_roles' => $this->listCompanyRoles($company),
Request #52
deepseek-v4-flash
P:54.06K C:199 CR:53.63K CW:0
2664ms
Reasoning
The GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController is present in the codebase (in the working tree, since merged). Let's read a bit around to check route & validation. Also read around GovernanceController hub build (line 3300-3345) to see what hub passes: aut_authorization_types etc, and aut_all building to see new fields in serialization (from entity GovernanceAuthorization). And check authorizationSave route. But given context size constraints and the "other files changed" note, since the controller isn't in review_files, maybe backend was merged from other branch earlier (feature/cc-auth-config-model). The controller exists in current tree? Let's read the config controller fully; it's small.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Controller/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController.php"}
Result
File: src/Controller/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController.php (Total lines: 133)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-133
1|<?php
2|
3|declare(strict_types=1);
4|
5|namespace App\Controller\Governance;
6|
7|use App\Entity\Company;
8|use App\Entity\User;
9|use App\Service\Governance\GovernanceAuthorizationConfigService;
10|use Doctrine\ORM\EntityManagerInterface;
11|use Psr\Log\LoggerInterface;
12|use Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Controller\AbstractController;
13|use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\JsonResponse;
14|use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request;
15|use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\RequestStack;
16|
17|final class GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController extends AbstractController
18|{
19| public function __construct(
20| private EntityManagerInterface $entityManager,
21| private RequestStack $requestStack,
22| private GovernanceAuthorizationConfigService $authorizationConfigService,
23| private LoggerInterface $logger,
24| ) {
25| }
26|
27| public function show(): JsonResponse
28| {
29| /** @var User|null $user */
30| $user = $this->getUser();
31| $company = $this->currentGovernanceCompany();
32| if (!$user || !$company) {
33| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Não autenticado.'], 401);
34| }
35| if (!$this->canManageAuthorizationConfig()) {
36| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Sem permissão para consultar configurações de Autorizações.'], 403);
37| }
38|
39| $view = $this->authorizationConfigService->getViewData($company);
40|
41| return new JsonResponse([
42| 'success' => true,
43| 'authorization_types' => $view['aut_authorization_types'],
44| 'use_members' => $view['aut_authorization_use_members'],
45| 'use_roles' => $view['aut_authorization_use_roles'],
46| 'approver_members' => $view['aut_authorization_approver_members'],
47| 'approver_roles' => $view['aut_authorization_approver_roles'],
48| 'company_roles' => $view['aut_company_roles'],
49| ]);
50| }
51|
52| public function save(Request $request): JsonResponse
53| {
54| /** @var User|null $user */
55| $user = $this->getUser();
56| $company = $this->currentGovernanceCompany();
57| if (!$user || !$company) {
58| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Não autenticado.'], 401);
59| }
60| if (!$this->canManageAuthorizationConfig()) {
61| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Sem permissão para alterar configurações de Autorizações.'], 403);
62| }
63|
64| $payload = json_decode($request->getContent(), true);
65| if (!is_array($payload)) {
66| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Payload inválido.'], 400);
67| }
68|
69| try {
70| $data = $this->authorizationConfigService->savePayload($company, $payload, $user);
71| } catch (\InvalidArgumentException $e) {
72| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => $e->getMessage()], 422);
73| } catch (\Throwable $e) {
74| $this->logger->error('authorizationConfigSave: ' . $e->getMessage(), ['exception' => $e]);
75|
76| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Erro ao salvar configurações.'], 500);
77| }
78|
79| return new JsonResponse([
80| 'success' => true,
81| 'message' => 'Configurações salvas.',
82| 'authorization_types' => $data['authorization_types'],
83| 'use_members' => $data['use_members'],
84| 'use_roles' => $data['use_roles'],
85| 'approver_members' => $data['approver_members'],
86| 'approver_roles' => $data['approver_roles'],
87| ]);
88| }
89|
90| private function currentGovernanceCompany(): ?Company
91| {
92| $request = $this->requestStack->getCurrentRequest();
93| $currentCompany = $request?->attributes->get('current_company');
94| if ($currentCompany instanceof Company) {
95| return $currentCompany;
96| }
97|
98| if ($request !== null && $request->hasSession()) {
99| $selectedWorkspace = (string) $request->getSession()->get('selected_workspace', '');
100| if ($selectedWorkspace !== '' && str_starts_with($selectedWorkspace, 'company_')) {
101| $companyId = (int) str_replace('company_', '', $selectedWorkspace);
102| if ($companyId > 0) {
103| $companyFromWorkspace = $this->entityManager->getRepository(Company::class)->find($companyId);
104| if ($companyFromWorkspace instanceof Company) {
105| return $companyFromWorkspace;
106| }
107| }
108| }
109| }
110|
111| /** @var User|null $user */
112| $user = $this->getUser();
113|
114| return $user ? $user->getCompany() : null;
115| }
116|
117| private function canManageAuthorizationConfig(): bool
118| {
119| if ($this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN') || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER') || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR')) {
120| return true;
121| }
122|
123| $request = $this->requestStack->getCurrentRequest();
124| if (!$request) {
125| return false;
126| }
127|
128| return (bool) $request->attributes->get('can_create', false)
129| || (bool) $request->attributes->get('can_edit', false)
130| || (bool) $request->attributes->get('can_delete', false);
131| }
132|}
133|
Request #53
deepseek-v4-flash
P:55.8K C:456 CR:54.14K CW:0
4286ms
Reasoning
Config save controller exists. It validates permission (role check or attributes can_create/can_edit/can_delete). Interesting: `canManageAuthorizationConfig` returns true for MANAGER/MANAGER_GESTOR too, but the tab in the template only appears for `ssmaCanManageConfig`. Note mismatch potential but controller is outside review group; permission validation present. No CSRF check in controller. As a JSON endpoint behind login; same pattern as other save endpoints (which presumably also lack CSRF checks). Given existing pattern in module (conditions save also no CSRF), I'll mention as low/medium aligned with user rules but acknowledge pattern. Since my review must focus on the diff and be objective, and endpoint permission handled by backend: the front-end has no CSRF token. It's a real gap per project rules ("Toda mutação via formulário/AJAX envia {{ csrf_token(...) }} e o backend deve validar."). But note existing create/conditions endpoints also don't send CSRF tokens. Hmm. The user rule mandates flagging. I'll include as medium comment, referencing the general rule and noting that even if backend currently doesn't enforce CSRF, adding the token is cheap.
Wait, however, one very relevant potential CSRF issue: because backend uses same-origin session cookies with possibly SameSite=None? can't know. We'll phrase neutrally.
Now let me now verify hub passes the needed variables to the index template for both the modal and settings; lines ~3300-3350. Let's read GovernanceController hub function. Search for 'governance/authorization/index.html.twig' render and preceding variable arrays.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/GovernanceController.php"], "search_text": "aut_authorization_types|aut_company_areas|aut_company_roles|allMembers", "use_perl_regexp": true}
Result
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php
Match lines: 10
1045| 'allMembers' => $viewData['allMembers'] ?? [],
1297| $viewData['allMembers'],
2932| $allMembers = [];
2949| $allMembers[] = [
2993| foreach ($allMembers as $memberIndex => $memberRow) {
2994| $allMembers[$memberIndex]['team_names'] = $memberTeamsMap[(int) $memberRow['id']] ?? [];
3001| 'allMembers' => $allMembers,
3013| private function loadAuthorizationsData(Company $company, array $allMembers, array $teams, ?array $visibleMemberIds = null): array
3059| foreach ($allMembers as $memberRow) {
3330| $totalMembers = count($allMembers);
Request #54
deepseek-v4-flash
P:56.46K C:138 CR:56.19K CW:0
2099ms
Reasoning
Need to find where index render passes config vars (e.g., at hub method for index authorization). Let's read lines 3250-3360 to see how variables set and whether aut_authorization_types etc. provided to the index template.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 3400, "file_path": "src/Controller/GovernanceController.php", "start_line": 3260}
Result
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php (Total lines: 6066)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 3260-3400
3260| $autAll = [];
3261| $kpiAtivas = 0;
3262| $kpiInativas = 0;
3263| $kpiMemberIds = [];
3264| foreach ($autorizacoes as $aut) {
3265| $requisitosList = $aut->getRequisitosList();
3266| $validadeInfo = $this->authorizationConditionConfig->resolveAuthorizationValidadeDisplay($company, $requisitosList);
3267| $statusReal = strtolower((string) ($aut->getStatus() ?: 'ativa')) === 'ativa' ? 'ativa' : 'inativa';
3268| if ($statusReal === 'ativa') {
3269| ++$kpiAtivas;
3270| } else {
3271| ++$kpiInativas;
3272| }
3273|
3274| $colaboradores = [];
3275| foreach ($aut->getColaboradoresMembros() as $cm) {
3276| $cmId = (int) $cm->getId();
3277| if ($visibleMemberIdSet !== null && !isset($visibleMemberIdSet[$cmId])) {
3278| continue;
3279| }
3280|
3281| $kpiMemberIds[$cmId] = true;
3282| $cmUser = $cm->getUser();
3283| $colaboradores[] = [
3284| 'id' => $cmId,
3285| 'name' => $cm->getFullName() ?: ($cm->getEmail() ?? ''),
3286| 'avatar' => $cmUser ? $cmUser->getAvatar() : null,
3287| ];
3288| }
3289|
3290| $responsavelMember = $aut->getResponsavelMember();
3291| $responsavelId = $responsavelMember ? (int) $responsavelMember->getId() : null;
3292| $responsavelRow = null;
3293| if ($responsavelMember) {
3294| $respUser = $responsavelMember->getUser();
3295| $responsavelRow = [
3296| 'id' => (int) $responsavelMember->getId(),
3297| 'name' => $responsavelMember->getFullName() ?: ($responsavelMember->getEmail() ?? ''),
3298| 'avatar' => $respUser ? $respUser->getAvatar() : null,
3299| ];
3300| }
3301|
3302| $titulo = $aut->getTitulo();
3303| if ($visibleMemberIdSet !== null && $colaboradores === []) {
3304| continue;
3305| }
3306|
3307| $descCat = AutorizacaoTipoCatalog::descricaoPorTitulo($titulo);
3308| $descGrav = $aut->getDescricao();
3309|
3310| $autAll[] = [
3311| 'id' => $aut->getId(),
3312| 'titulo' => $titulo,
3313| 'descricao' => $descGrav !== '' && $descGrav !== null ? $descGrav : null,
3314| 'descricao_exibicao' => $descCat ?? ($descGrav !== '' && $descGrav !== null ? $descGrav : null),
3315| 'validade' => $validadeInfo['validade_dias'] !== null ? (string) $validadeInfo['validade_dias'] : null,
3316| 'validade_exibicao' => $validadeInfo['validade_exibicao'],
3317| 'emitida' => $aut->getEmitida()?->format('Y-m-d'),
3318| 'status' => $aut->getStatus(),
3319| 'status_real' => $statusReal,
3320| 'responsavel_id' => $responsavelId,
3321| 'responsavel' => $responsavelRow,
3322| 'colaboradores' => $colaboradores,
3323| 'requisitos' => $aut->getRequisitosList(),
3324| 'contractor_requirement_dependencies' => $aut->getContractorRequirementDependencies(),
3325| 'contractor_requirement_dependencies_detalhes' => $this->buildAuthorizationContractorRequirementDetails($company, $aut->getContractorRequirementDependencies()),
3326| 'requisitos_detalhes' => $this->buildAuthorizationRequirementDetails($company, $requisitosList),
3327| ];
3328| }
3329|
3330| $totalMembers = count($allMembers);
3331| $colabsSemAut = max(0, $totalMembers - count($membersWithActiveAuth));
3332| $percConformidade = $totalMembers > 0
3333| ? (int) round(count($membersWithActiveAuth) / $totalMembers * 100)
3334| : 0;
3335| arsort($expiredByTeam);
3336| $expiredByTeamChart = [];
3337| foreach ($expiredByTeam as $teamName => $count) {
3338| $expiredByTeamChart[] = ['name' => $teamName, 'count' => $count];
3339| }
3340|
3341| return [
3342| 'aut_rows' => $tableRows,
3343| 'aut_all' => $autAll,
3344| 'aut_ativas' => $ativas,
3345| 'aut_vencidas' => $vencidas,
3346| 'aut_a_vencer' => $aVencerRows,
3347| 'aut_colabs_sem_aut' => $colabsSemAut,
3348| 'aut_perc_conformidade' => $percConformidade,
3349| 'aut_teams_by_status' => array_values($teamsByStatus),
3350| 'aut_alertas' => $alertas,
3351| 'aut_chart_data' => [
3352| 'vencidas' => $chartVencidas,
3353| 'proximos_30' => $chartProx30,
3354| 'dias_31_60' => $chartDias3160,
3355| 'dias_61_90' => $chartDias6190,
3356| ],
3357| 'aut_expired_by_team' => $expiredByTeamChart,
3358| 'aut_requisitos_catalog' => AutorizacaoRequisitoCatalog::labelsOrdered(),
3359| 'aut_kpi_total' => count($autAll),
3360| 'aut_kpi_ativas' => $kpiAtivas,
3361| 'aut_kpi_inativas' => $kpiInativas,
3362| 'aut_kpi_colaboradores' => count($kpiMemberIds),
3363| ];
3364| }
3365|
3366| /**
3367| * @return array<string, mixed>
3368| */
3369| private function buildAuthorizationDetailPayload(Company $company, GovernanceAuthorization $aut): array
3370| {
3371| $avatarColors = ['#EA151C', '#186073', '#25AD52', '#FFC107', '#6F42C1', '#FD7E14', '#20C997', '#DC3545'];
3372| $requisitosList = $aut->getRequisitosList();
3373| $validadeInfo = $this->authorizationConditionConfig->resolveAuthorizationValidadeDisplay($company, $requisitosList);
3374| $statusReal = strtolower((string) ($aut->getStatus() ?: 'ativa')) === 'ativa' ? 'ativa' : 'inativa';
3375|
3376| $conditionsByNome = [];
3377| foreach ($this->authorizationConditionConfig->getConditionsForFrontend($company) as $condition) {
3378| $nome = trim((string) ($condition['nome'] ?? ''));
3379| if ($nome !== '') {
3380| $conditionsByNome[$nome] = $condition;
3381| }
3382| }
3383|
3384| $tipoLabels = [
3385| 'documento' => 'Documento',
3386| 'certificacao' => 'Certificação',
3387| 'treinamento' => 'Treinamento',
3388| 'dados_perfil' => 'Dados de perfil',
3389| 'outro' => 'Outro',
3390| ];
3391|
3392| $requisitos = [];
3393| foreach ($requisitosList as $requisitoNome) {
3394| $condition = $conditionsByNome[$requisitoNome] ?? null;
3395| $tipo = $condition ? trim((string) ($condition['tipo'] ?? 'outro')) : 'outro';
3396| $validadeExibicao = $condition
3397| ? GovernanceAuthorizationConditionConfigService::formatConditionValidadeDisplay($condition)
3398| : GovernanceAuthorizationConditionConfigService::formatValidadeDisplay('');
3399|
3400| $requisitos[] = [
Request #55
deepseek-v4-flash
P:58.77K C:383 CR:56.58K CW:0
4297ms
Reasoning
This is the crucial cross-file contract: in `loadAuthorizationsData`'s returned `aut_all` entries (lines 3310-3327), the new fields `area_id`, `tipo`, `aprovador_id`, `aprovador_role_id` are NOT serialized. This is the backend counterpart that is NOT in the review group but this PR's front-end expects them (applyAutCriarModalFields). This creates a real regression: when editing an existing authorization via the modal, `aut.area_id` undefined, `aut.tipo` undefined, `aut.aprovador_id` undefined → fields show blank (area/tipo required!). Actually wait - the earlier hub data structure is `aut_all` = catalog used for editing via the create tab table (governance index "Criação"). Editing modal in the create tab reads from AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG (aut_all), and now expects new keys.
But wait — maybe applyAutCriarModalFields is only reached from the modal opened from list rows (the create tab index) via AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG; or via detail endpoint? Earlier lines 1679-1681 show some resolve function merges catalog. Let me read around 1670-1700 to see where detail info comes (maybe detail endpoint provides full data with new fields).
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 1700, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig", "start_line": 1660}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig (Total lines: 2423)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1660-1700
1660| aut = aut || {};
1661| if (aut.responsavel_id) {
1662| return aut.responsavel_id;
1663| }
1664| if (aut.responsavel && aut.responsavel.id) {
1665| return aut.responsavel.id;
1666| }
1667| if (Array.isArray(aut.colaboradores) && aut.colaboradores[0] && aut.colaboradores[0].id) {
1668| return aut.colaboradores[0].id;
1669| }
1670| return '';
1671| }
1672|
1673| function resolveAutCriarPayload($btn) {
1674| var autId = parseInt(String(
1675| $btn.attr('data-aut-id')
1676| || $btn.closest('[data-aut-id]').attr('data-aut-id')
1677| || ''
1678| ), 10);
1679| if (autId && AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG[String(autId)]) {
1680| return $.extend(true, {}, AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG[String(autId)]);
1681| }
1682|
1683| var raw = String($btn.attr('data-aut') || '').trim();
1684| if (!raw) {
1685| return {};
1686| }
1687| try {
1688| return JSON.parse(raw);
1689| } catch (e) {
1690| return {};
1691| }
1692| }
1693|
1694| function ensureAutCriarSelectOption(selectId, value, text) {
1695| var $select = $('#' + selectId);
1696| var str = String(value || '').trim();
1697| if (!$select.length || !str) {
1698| return;
1699| }
1700| var exists = $select.find('option').filter(function () {
Request #56
deepseek-v4-flash
P:59.66K C:611 CR:59.14K CW:0
5742ms
Reasoning
So the edit uses `AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG` from `aut_all` in the server-rendered page. Since GovernanceController's `loadAuthorizationsData` currently doesn't include the new keys `area_id`/`tipo`/`aprovador_id`/`aprovador_role_id` (nor `area`, `aprovador`, `aprovador_role` nested), the edit modal would show area/tipo/aprovador blank whenever the fields were previously set — and since area & tipo are now required, saving an edited authorization would force user to re-select. Moreover if the user just views, no data.
Wait, but the feature branch likely also modified GovernanceController/SSMA hub etc. in earlier commits that are NOT part of this review's changed files (the review group only contains 4 template files). The task description says the review group is templates; the branch summary says backend model/API merged from cc-auth-config-model with 6 commits omitted. The controller file we read is the current state; but is this current state the merge result? We searched the current tree (post-merge) which is origin/new_staging2 + these changes? Actually code_search reads "current version of files" — the working directory state presumably at this PR head, i.e., includes merged model branch. So GovernanceController may not yet serialize the new fields because that part is in the model branch that serializes when authorizing save. Hmm, but the summary said the model & API merged in "GovernanceController (hub e save/get da config)" etc. The `aut_all` builder in the hub still lacks area/aprovador/tipo serialization, which indicates the front-end expects fields that the current backend view doesn't provide. But caution: this could be present elsewhere — maybe GovernanceAuthorization serialization in SsmaController lines 2465-2513 aut_all is a different (SSMA hub) that includes the fields. Since the templates reviewed (index.html.twig) may render from GovernanceController hub or SSMA hub? Wait there are two index pages: governance authorization index vs ssma hub. Which controller renders 'governance/authorization/index.html.twig'? Search for render of that template.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/"], "search_text": "governance/authorization/index.html.twig"}
Result
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php
Match lines: 1
417| return $this->render('governance/authorization/index.html.twig', $this->buildAuthorizationHubContext());
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
739| return $this->render('governance/authorization/index.html.twig', array_merge($viewData, $autData, [
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/GovernanceController.php"], "search_text": "aprovador_role_id|aprovador_id|area_id"}
Result
No matches found
Request #57
deepseek-v4-flash
P:60.39K C:676 CR:60.16K CW:0
5967ms
Reasoning
Both GovernanceController and SsmaController render this index template, and neither GovernanceController's aut_all has the new fields. SsmaController aut_all at 2465 may differ. Let's look at the SsmaController's aut_all builder (2400-2520) to check if fields included there. Actually, the relevant controller is whichever is used. But regardless, in the current tree, GovernanceController's loadAuthorizationsData (the hub) lacks the new fields in `aut_all` → the create tab modal edit can't prefill area/tipo/aprovador. However, maybe the detail/`visualizar` flow now fetches from detail endpoint `governance_authorization_detail` which builds payload with fields. But editing populates from AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG, not detail. So, unless the hub code was also updated (maybe by commits not included in review group but already in the branch base...), this may be resolved by the SsmaController version.
But wait: Which controller is actually used for the authorization module index? GovernanceController has `authorizationIndex` route? Both render the same template, but each at different route contexts. The feature branch target is the "Central de Governança → Autorizações" which is under Governance. So GovernanceController::buildAuthorizationHubContext is the relevant one.
Now, is buildAuthorizationHubContext code we read (aut_all) the current state that includes config support? It appears hub context merges `$this->authorizationConfigService->getViewData($company)` maybe elsewhere in buildAuthorizationHubContext; but the `aut_all` entries built in loadAuthorizationsData do not carry the four new columns. That means the hub page's `aut_all` is missing the fields required to prefill the edit form — an integration gap introduced by this diff (the template consuming fields the served JSON doesn't have).
But caution: `applyAutCriarModalFields` may only be used after fetching fresh data from the detail endpoint when clicking visualizar? Let's trace: `js-aut-criar-visualizar` click handler opens detail offcanvas (via AJAX detail endpoint?) not the modal. Actually there are separate flows: `js-aut-criar-visualizar` (visualizar) opens the detail offcanvas, and the edit button opens modal edit using `resolveAutCriarPayload` from AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG. Wait, but there is also `autCriarEdicaoId`; modal used both for create and edit. Where does edit fill come from? Let's search the handler for opening modal edit; search `js-aut-criar-editar` click. Let's examine around where pendingAutCriarFill used.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig"], "search_text": "applyAutCriarModalFields|resolveAutCriarPayload|js-aut-criar-editar"}
Result
No matches found
Request #58
deepseek-v4-flash
P:61.08K C:217 CR:61.06K CW:0
2827ms
Reasoning
Odd: no matches? The `applyAutCriarModalFields` is definitely in the file (line 1715+ per diff). The code_search for multiple words with no perl regex will treat literal entire string and thus no match. Need single terms.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig"], "search_text": "applyAutCriarModalFields"}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig
Match lines: 2
1635| applyAutCriarModalFields(pendingAutCriarFill);
1718| function applyAutCriarModalFields(aut) {
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig"], "search_text": "js-aut-criar-editar"}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig
Match lines: 2
779| class: 'btn-default btn-sm ssma-aqc-table-action-btn ssma-aqc-edit-btn js-aut-criar-editar',
1980| $(document).on('click', '.js-aut-criar-editar', function (e) {
Request #59
deepseek-v4-flash
P:61.47K C:99 CR:61.18K CW:0
1729ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 1660, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig", "start_line": 1590}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig (Total lines: 2423)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1590-1660
1590| return;
1591| }
1592| $('#aut-criar-search-input, #aut-criar-search-mobile-input').val('');
1593| if (typeof window.setCustomSelectValue === 'function') {
1594| window.setCustomSelectValue('aut-criar-requisito-filter', 'todos');
1595| window.setCustomSelectValue('aut-criar-status-filter', 'todos');
1596| } else {
1597| $('#aut-criar-requisito-filter, #aut-criar-status-filter').val('todos');
1598| }
1599| if (typeof window.resetMobileSelectFullscreen === 'function') {
1600| window.resetMobileSelectFullscreen('autCriarRequisitoFilterMobile', false);
1601| window.resetMobileSelectFullscreen('autCriarStatusFilterMobile', false);
1602| } else {
1603| $('#autCriarRequisitoFilterMobile, #autCriarStatusFilterMobile').val('todos');
1604| }
1605| applyAutCriarFilters();
1606| });
1607|
1608| if (typeof MobileFilters !== 'undefined') {
1609| MobileFilters.syncMobileWithDesktop('autCriarRequisitoFilterMobile', 'aut-criar-requisito-filter');
1610| MobileFilters.syncMobileWithDesktop('autCriarStatusFilterMobile', 'aut-criar-status-filter');
1611| MobileFilters.syncSearchInputs('aut-criar-search-mobile-input', 'aut-criar-search-input');
1612| }
1613|
1614| function bootAutCriarTab() {
1615| applyAutCriarFilters();
1616| initAutCriarReqTagSelect();
1617| initAutCriarContractorReqTagSelect();
1618| ensureAutTableReady();
1619| }
1620|
1621| if (document.readyState === 'loading') {
1622| $(document).ready(bootAutCriarTab);
1623| } else {
1624| bootAutCriarTab();
1625| }
1626|
1627| $(document).on('shown.bs.modal', '#modalAdicionarAut', function () {
1628| var modalEl = document.getElementById('modalAdicionarAut');
1629| if (modalEl && modalEl.parentNode !== document.body) {
1630| document.body.appendChild(modalEl);
1631| }
1632| initAutCriarReqTagSelect();
1633| initAutCriarContractorReqTagSelect();
1634| if (pendingAutCriarFill) {
1635| applyAutCriarModalFields(pendingAutCriarFill);
1636| pendingAutCriarFill = null;
1637| }
1638| if (typeof window.initAllCustomSelectWrappers === 'function') {
1639| window.initAllCustomSelectWrappers();
1640| }
1641| syncAutCriarCustomSelectOptions($('#autCriarRequisitoAdd'));
1642| syncAutCriarCustomSelectOptions($('#autCriarContractorReqAdd'));
1643| if (!getAutCriarRequisitosFromTags().length) {
1644| resetAutCriarCustomSelect('autCriarRequisitoAdd', '');
1645| updateAutCriarTagSelectCountLabel(AUT_REQ_TAG_CONFIG);
1646| }
1647| if (!getAutCriarContractorReqsFromTags().length) {
1648| resetAutCriarCustomSelect('autCriarContractorReqAdd', '');
1649| updateAutCriarTagSelectCountLabel(AUT_CONTRACTOR_REQ_TAG_CONFIG);
1650| }
1651| AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS.forEach(function (selectId) {
1652| var currentVal = $('#' + selectId).val();
1653| if (currentVal) {
1654| setAutCriarSelectValue(selectId, currentVal);
1655| }
1656| });
1657| });
1658|
1659| function resolveAutCriarResponsavelId(aut) {
1660| aut = aut || {};
Request #60
deepseek-v4-flash
P:62.61K C:122 CR:61.44K CW:0
1750ms
Reasoning
Where does pendingAutCriarFill get set on edit click? Read lines 1975-2000.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 2010, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig", "start_line": 1975}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig (Total lines: 2423)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1975-2010
1975| resetAutAuthorizationReactivateModal();
1976| $('#autAuthorizationReactivateModal').data('aut-id', autId).modal('show');
1977| });
1978|
1979| /* ── Abrir modal (editar) ── */
1980| $(document).on('click', '.js-aut-criar-editar', function (e) {
1981| e.preventDefault();
1982| var $btn = $(this);
1983| if ($btn.hasClass('js-aut-monit-open')) {
1984| window.__autPostSaveTab = 'tab_auth_monitoramento';
1985| } else {
1986| window.__autPostSaveTab = null;
1987| }
1988| var aut = resolveAutCriarPayload($btn);
1989| if (!aut.id) {
1990| if (typeof showToast === 'function') {
1991| showToast('Não foi possível carregar os dados da autorização.', 'Erro', 'fas fa-times', 'bg-danger');
1992| }
1993| return;
1994| }
1995| populateAutCriarModal(aut, 'edit', { extendMode: $btn.hasClass('js-aut-monit-open') });
1996| });
1997|
1998| /* ── Salvar ── */
1999| $(document).on('click', '#btnSalvarAdicionarAut', function () {
2000| flushAutCriarPendingRequisitoSelection();
2001| flushAutCriarPendingContractorReqSelection();
2002| AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS.forEach(syncAutCriarSelectFromCustomUi);
2003|
2004| var titulo = $.trim($('#autCriarTitulo').val());
2005| var descricao = $.trim($('#autCriarDescricao').val());
2006| var id = $('#autCriarEdicaoId').val();
2007| var responsavelId = readAutCriarResponsavelFromForm();
2008| var areaId = readAutCriarSelectId('autCriarArea');
2009| var aprovadorId = readAutCriarSelectId('autCriarAprovador');
2010| var aprovadorRoleId = readAutCriarSelectId('autCriarAprovadorRole');
Request #61
deepseek-v4-flash
P:63.34K C:506 CR:62.72K CW:0
5008ms
Reasoning
Confirmed the edit modal reads from `AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG` (aut_all). Thus if the backend (GovernanceController hub aut_all) doesn't serialize area_id/tipo/aprovador_id/aprovador_role_id, editing shows blank for those and forces re-selection. The current code in GovernanceController (which is post-merge working tree state) doesn't include them. But note: since model branch merged, maybe GovernanceController hub was intended to be modified in this feature and this diff is incomplete (author said "no review, conferir se authorizationSave já grava esses campos nesta entrega"). Since the front-end depends on these fields, we should flag in review comment as a high/medium: fields not present in hub payload (aut_all), so editing won't restore area/tipo/aprovador, and this contradicts PR scope to populate them back.
Wait, careful: code_search reads current working tree which presumably includes the feature branch tip (the whole branch merged into new_staging2). Hmm, but the review is pre-merge on PR. The diff being reviewed is only the templates diff; other files already merged from feature/cc-auth-config-model are in the base? Actually target branch new_staging2, source feature/cc-auth-settings-ui. The PR includes template changes plus possibly SsmaAutomationService change (-1). The config controller & service & entity & GovernanceController aut_all modifications came from the model branch already merged into the feature (since commits merged remote feature/cc-auth-config-model). So the working tree includes them. Thus indeed GovernanceController aut_all lacks serialization of the four new fields → mismatch. Let me double check by searching GovernanceController for where aut_all uses area or aprovador getters for aut (getArea etc.). Search "getArea" in GovernanceController.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/GovernanceController.php"], "search_text": "getArea|getAprovador|getTipo"}
Result
No matches found
file_read_diff
Show Details
Arguments
{"path_array": ["src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php"]}
Result
==== FILE: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php ==== diff --git a/src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php b/src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php --- a/src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php +++ b/src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@ <?php - declare(strict_types=1); namespace App\Service\Ssma;
Request #62
deepseek-v4-flash
P:63.98K C:467 CR:63.74K CW:0
4956ms
Reasoning
GovernanceController has no getArea/getAprovador/getTipo anywhere, confirming the hub does not serialize the new fields into aut_all. This is a strong, concrete finding: the template's JS `applyAutCriarModalFields` expects `area_id`/`tipo`/`aprovador_id`/`aprovador_role_id` from `aut_all`/`aut_all` entries, but the backend controller building that payload (GovernanceController::loadAuthorizationsData, lines 3310-3327) doesn't include them. So the edit flow will leave the new required fields blank on already saved autorizações, forcing re-selection and contradicting the PR's own "Como testar" step 5 (edit and confirm fields come back preenchidos). Since GovernanceController is outside review group, we frame as cross-file contract break.
Actually wait, maybe the controller has a different aut_all used — SSMA hub path where the create tab page in the ssma product might use SsmaController aut_all with fields? But GovernanceController hub is used for "Central de Governança" route in which index is rendered; also SsmaController route also renders the same template but for SSMA hub. In GovernanceController line 3310-3327, no new fields; in SsmaController aut_all building, need to check lines 2465-2513. But regardless at least one of them (Governance) lacks fields, and the template is the same. Since the review files include the create tab that now consumes these fields from aut_all, there's definitely a contract break for the Governance hub path.
Let me check SsmaController aut_all lines 2465-2513 to see if it has them (if so, the mismatch exists for one of the two rendering contexts only).
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 2530, "file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 2465}
Result
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 27759)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 2465-2530
2465| // aut_all — one entry per authorization (for "Criação" card grid)
2466| $autAll = [];
2467| foreach ($autorizacoes as $aut) {
2468| $validadeStr = $aut->getValidade();
2469| $statusReal = strtolower((string) ($aut->getStatus() ?: 'ativa')) === 'ativa' ? 'ativa' : 'inativa';
2470|
2471| $colaboradores = [];
2472| foreach ($aut->getColaboradoresMembros() as $cm) {
2473| $cmId = (int) $cm->getId();
2474| $cmUser = $cm->getUser();
2475| $colaboradores[] = [
2476| 'id' => $cmId,
2477| 'name' => $cm->getFullName() ?: ($cm->getEmail() ?? ''),
2478| 'avatar' => $cmUser ? $cmUser->getAvatar() : null,
2479| ];
2480| }
2481|
2482| $titulo = $aut->getTitulo();
2483| $descCat = AutorizacaoTipoCatalog::descricaoPorTitulo($titulo);
2484| $descGrav = $aut->getDescricao();
2485|
2486| $autAll[] = [
2487| 'id' => $aut->getId(),
2488| 'titulo' => $titulo,
2489| 'descricao' => $descGrav !== '' && $descGrav !== null ? $descGrav : null,
2490| 'descricao_exibicao' => $descCat ?? ($descGrav !== '' && $descGrav !== null ? $descGrav : null),
2491| 'validade' => $validadeStr,
2492| 'emitida' => $aut->getEmitida()?->format('Y-m-d'),
2493| 'status' => $aut->getStatus(),
2494| 'status_real' => $statusReal,
2495| 'colaboradores' => $colaboradores,
2496| 'requisitos' => $aut->getRequisitosList(),
2497| ];
2498| }
2499|
2500| $totalMembers = count($allMembers);
2501| $colabsSemAut = max(0, $totalMembers - count($membersWithActiveAuth));
2502| $percConformidade = $totalMembers > 0
2503| ? (int) round(count($membersWithActiveAuth) / $totalMembers * 100)
2504| : 0;
2505| arsort($expiredByTeam);
2506| $expiredByTeamChart = [];
2507| foreach ($expiredByTeam as $teamName => $count) {
2508| $expiredByTeamChart[] = ['name' => $teamName, 'count' => $count];
2509| }
2510|
2511| return [
2512| 'aut_rows' => $tableRows,
2513| 'aut_all' => $autAll,
2514| 'aut_ativas' => $ativas,
2515| 'aut_vencidas' => $vencidas,
2516| 'aut_colabs_sem_aut' => $colabsSemAut,
2517| 'aut_perc_conformidade' => $percConformidade,
2518| 'aut_alertas' => $alertas,
2519| 'aut_chart_data' => [
2520| 'vencidas' => $vencidas,
2521| 'proximos_30' => $prox30,
2522| 'dias_31_60' => $dias3160,
2523| 'dias_61_90' => $dias6190,
2524| ],
2525| 'aut_expired_by_team' => $expiredByTeamChart,
2526| 'aut_requisitos_catalog' => AutorizacaoRequisitoCatalog::labelsOrdered(),
2527| ];
2528| }
2529|
2530| public function ssmaAutorizacaoSalvar(Request $request): JsonResponse
Request #63
deepseek-v4-flash
P:65.51K C:575 CR:64.38K CW:0
6001ms
Reasoning
Neither hub serializes the new fields. So the edit-modal prefill is broken. But wait: maybe editing doesn't use the hub's aut_all because create-tab edits use the catalog of the grid (the same page data). Yes it does.
But there may be a different flow for editing that fetches detail from the detail endpoint. However code shows edit uses `resolveAutCriarPayload` from `AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG` which is built from `aut_all` (server side). Since both controllers' `aut_all` don't carry the four new keys, the modal cannot prefill. Actually wait, `GovernanceController::loadAuthorizationsData` entries include responsavel_id etc. which come from entity's getResponsavelMember, requiring relation member. For new columns, entity probably has area_id/tipo/aprovador_member_id/aprovador_role_id with relations; the controllers simply don't expose them.
But is that because model branch code hasn't added the columns to entity? We saw in branch summary docs, columns were added. So GovernanceController needs updating but that file is not in the diff group (in this PR diff group only templates). Hmm, but maybe the model branch (already merged) has the SAVE endpoint reading them (authorizationSave). The hub controller change (adding them to view) might be part of THIS PR but missing from files changed? It says files changed = 6 twig=5 php=1. The php=1 is SsmaAutomationService. So indeed backend hub serialization not part of this PR — meaning the front-end consumption is ahead of the backend supply — either because model branch provides elsewhere, or a true omission to be fixed in this PR. Either way, the diff is unusable for the edit prefill requirement, unless maybe edit modal reads data-aut attributes on rows that are server built with all fields... but rows data-aut attr may contain only ids; reading resolveAutCriarPayload: prefers AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG by id; fallback JSON from data-aut attr of button. The new autActionsCell only adds data-aut-id for visualizar. Editing buttons presumably already have data-aut? Let's look at the edit button construction around lines 780-800 (diff context) to see attributes.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 830, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig", "start_line": 756}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig (Total lines: 2423)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 756-830
756| {% endif %}
757| {% endset %}
758|
759| {% set autActionsCell = [
760| {
761| type: 'button',
762| icon: 'fa-regular fa-eye',
763| class: 'btn-default btn-sm ssma-aqc-table-action-btn js-aut-criar-visualizar',
764| url: '#',
765| attributes: {
766| 'data-aut-id': aut.id,
767| 'data-toggle': 'tooltip',
768| 'data-container': 'body',
769| 'data-boundary': 'viewport',
770| 'title': 'Visualizar autorização'
771| }
772| }
773| ] %}
774| {% if ssmaCanCreateAuthorization|default(false) %}
775| {% set autActionsCell = autActionsCell|merge([
776| {
777| type: 'button',
778| icon: 'fa-regular fa-pen',
779| class: 'btn-default btn-sm ssma-aqc-table-action-btn ssma-aqc-edit-btn js-aut-criar-editar',
780| url: '#',
781| attributes: {
782| 'data-aut-id': aut.id,
783| 'data-aut': aut|json_encode|e('html_attr'),
784| 'data-toggle': 'tooltip',
785| 'data-container': 'body',
786| 'data-boundary': 'viewport',
787| 'title': 'Editar autorização'
788| }
789| },
790| {
791| type: 'dropdown',
792| items: [
793| {
794| label: isAtivaTbl ? 'Inativar autorização' : 'Reativar autorização',
795| icon: 'fas fa-tag mr-2',
796| class: 'js-aut-criar-toggle-status',
797| url: '#',
798| attributes: {
799| 'data-aut-id': aut.id,
800| 'data-aut-active': isAtivaTbl ? '1' : '0'
801| }
802| },
803| {
804| label: 'Deletar autorização',
805| icon: 'fas fa-trash-alt mr-2',
806| class: 'text-danger js-aut-criar-remover',
807| url: '#',
808| attributes: {
809| 'data-aut-id': aut.id,
810| 'data-aut-titulo': aut.titulo|e('html_attr'),
811| 'data-aut-status': aut.status_real|default('')|e('html_attr')
812| }
813| }
814| ]
815| }
816| ]) %}
817| {% endif %}
818|
819| {% set autTableRows = autTableRows|merge([{
820| 'id': aut.id,
821| 'titulo': autTitleCell|trim,
822| 'requisitos': autReqsCell|trim,
823| 'validade': validadeTbl,
824| 'status': autStatusCell|trim,
825| 'responsavel': autResponsibleCell|trim,
826| 'Ações': autActionsCell,
827| '_aut-status': aut.status_real|default('')|e('html_attr'),
828| '_aut-reqs': aut.requisitos|default([])|join('|')|lower|e('html_attr')
829| }]) %}
830| {% endfor %}
Request #64
deepseek-v4-flash
P:66.92K C:476 CR:66.05K CW:0
5268ms
Reasoning
The visualizar button is now outside the canCreate block, but the entire create tab is rendered only under canCreate anyway (index.html.twig line 55-61). So the visualizar change only affects users with canCreate. That means it does not change exposure, but it's a no-op? Actually there's still a scenario: previously, the actions cell when canCreate false - but the create tab wasn't rendered at all then, so no table. Meaning the change is effectively dead code refactor. But wait, maybe this create tab is also included in monitoring page? No, monitoring uses separate template. So no functional difference; not a security concern. So drop the medium on visibility.
Actually hold on: The row data-aut attr contains the entire aut JSON `aut|json_encode` with the four new fields when aut_all doesn't include them. But AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG has precedence. For edit buttons, resolveAutCriarPayload checks catalog first then data-aut. If catalog lacks new fields, it would use data-aut fallback... only if catalog missing entry. It's a map of all auths by id; the edit button data-aut has the same server object (serialized in template `aut` variable = table rows come from aut_all?). Table rows built from aut_all list (aut_all entries loop). So data-aut is identical serialization to catalog entry; no new fields in either.
So unless backend hub serialization is updated to include fields, edit prefill broken. This is a real functional gap worth reporting at medium/high. Given the branch summary says editing should restore fields (step 5 of test) and "authorizationSave" probably writes them (need to verify that backend save actually writes the fields). Let's check the save endpoint to see if new columns are written (i.e., GovernanceController authorization save payload). Search for area_id in GovernanceController/authorization save.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/"], "search_text": "area_responsavel|setArea|aprovadorRole|setTipo"}
Result
No matches found
Request #65
deepseek-v4-flash
P:67.41K C:226 CR:67.33K CW:0
2824ms
Reasoning
No matches in src for setting area/aprovador role on member_autorizacao — so the save endpoint `governance_authorization_save` doesn't yet write the four new fields. Let me search the save controller function quickly to see what it consumes. Search "governance_authorization_save" route controller.
Actually, we must be careful: maybe the model branch put logic in service. Search "aprovador_member_id" or "member_autorizacao".
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/"], "search_text": "aprovador_member_id"}
Result
File: src/Entity/GovernanceAuthorization.php Match lines: 1 99| * @ORM\JoinColumn(name="aprovador_member_id", referencedColumnName="id", nullable=true, onDelete="SET NULL")
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/"], "search_text": "area_id"}
Result
File: src/Controller/CompanyAreaController.php
Match lines: 2
290| $areaId = (int) $request->get('area_id');
367| $areaId = (int) $request->get('area_id');
File: src/Controller/CompanyMemberController.php
Match lines: 1
1969| 'innovation_area_id' => $sru->getStructuralResearch()->getId(),
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystem/FlowInstanceController.php
Match lines: 1
8134| 'professional_area_id'=> $survey->getProfessionalArea() ? $survey->getProfessionalArea()->getId() : null,
File: src/Controller/InnovationResearchController.php
Match lines: 10
953| 'innovation_area_id' => $sru->getStructuralResearch()->getId(),
7583| $sql .= " AND q.innovation_area_id = " . $innovationArea;
7635| $sql .= " AND q.innovation_area_id = " . $innovationArea;
7688| $sql .= " AND q.innovation_area_id = " . $innovationArea;
7837| srq.innovation_area_id = $innovationAreaId
9215| $data['__created_innovation_area_id'] = $ia->getId();
9328| if (empty($questionData['segmento']) && !empty($data['__created_innovation_area_id'])) {
9329| $createdIa = $entityManager->getRepository(InnovationArea::class)->find($data['__created_innovation_area_id']);
9543| if (empty($questionData['segmento']) && !empty($data['__created_innovation_area_id'])) {
9544| $createdIa = $entityManager->getRepository(InnovationArea::class)->find($data['__created_innovation_area_id']);
File: src/Controller/JobInterviewController.php
Match lines: 12
2929| $professionalAreaIds = $data['professional_area_ids'] ?? [];
2930| $professionalAreaId = $data['professional_area_id'] ?? null;
3253| 'professional_area_ids' => $request->request->all('professional_area_ids') ?: [],
3254| 'professional_area_id' => $request->request->get('professional_area_id'),
3262| if ($data['professional_area_id'] === '') {
3263| $data['professional_area_id'] = null;
3273| $data['professional_area_ids'] = array_filter($data['professional_area_ids'], fn($v) => $v !== '' && $v !== null);
4411| if (isset($data['professional_area_ids']) || isset($data['professional_area_id'])) {
4415| if (!empty($data['professional_area_ids']) && is_array($data['professional_area_ids'])) {
4416| $areaIds = array_filter($data['professional_area_ids'], fn($v) => $v !== '' && $v !== null);
4417| } elseif (!empty($data['professional_area_id']) && $data['professional_area_id'] !== '') {
4418| $areaIds = [$data['professional_area_id']];
File: src/Controller/PulseSurveyController.php
Match lines: 1
246| (int) ($data['professional_area_id'] ?? 0),
File: src/Controller/StructuralResearchController.php
Match lines: 4
2671| $sql .= " AND q.innovation_area_id = " . $innovationArea;
2720| $sql .= " AND q.innovation_area_id = " . $innovationArea;
2770| $sql .= " AND q.innovation_area_id = " . $innovationArea;
2908| srq.innovation_area_id = $innovationAreaId
File: src/Controller/StructuralResearchSurveyController.php
Match lines: 1
806| $professionalAreaId = (int) ($data['professional_area_id'] ?? 0);
File: src/Domains/FileManagement/v2/Service/Indexing/Classification/Rules/ProfessionalAreaDocumentTypeRule.php
Match lines: 1
48| $signals[] = 'text:professional_area_identity';
File: src/Entity/CompanyAreaResponsible.php
Match lines: 3
19| * @ORM\UniqueConstraint(name="uniq_company_area_responsible_pair", columns={"company_area_id", "company_member_id"})
22| * @ORM\Index(name="idx_company_area_responsible_area", columns={"company_area_id"}),
39| * @ORM\JoinColumn(name="company_area_id", referencedColumnName="id", nullable=false, onDelete="CASCADE")
File: src/Entity/CompanyAreaSynonym.php
Match lines: 2
13| * @ORM\UniqueConstraint(name="uniq_company_area_synonym_normalized", columns={"company_area_id", "normalized_synonym"})
16| * @ORM\Index(name="idx_company_area_synonym_company_area", columns={"company_area_id"}),
File: src/Entity/CompanyMemberArea.php
Match lines: 2
23| * @ORM\Index(name="idx_company_member_area_area", columns={"company_area_id"})
45| * @ORM\JoinColumn(name="company_area_id", referencedColumnName="id", nullable=false, onDelete="CASCADE")
File: src/Entity/GovernanceAuthorization.php
Match lines: 1
93| * @ORM\JoinColumn(name="area_id", referencedColumnName="id", nullable=true, onDelete="SET NULL")
File: src/Entity/JobInterviewTemplate.php
Match lines: 1
94| * inverseJoinColumns={@ORM\JoinColumn(name="professional_area_id", referencedColumnName="id", onDelete="CASCADE")}
File: src/Entity/StructuralResearchSurvey.php
Match lines: 1
89| * @ORM\JoinColumn(name="professional_area_id", referencedColumnName="id", nullable=true, onDelete="SET NULL")
File: src/Repository/GovernanceAuthorizationRepository.php
Match lines: 1
233| 'area_id' => $aut->getArea()?->getId(),
File: src/Service/Adriana/Questionnaire/Register/Handler/AssessmentRegisterHandler.php
Match lines: 1
186| $questionario['result']['innovation_area_id'] = $resultado['innovation_area_id'] ?? null;
File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowInstanceApplierService.php
Match lines: 1
359| $base['professional_area_id'] = (int) ($fields['professional_area_id'] ?? 0) ?: null;
File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowInstanceFieldCatalog.php
Match lines: 1
307| ['key' => 'professional_area_id', 'label' => 'Area profissional da pesquisa', 'type' => 'int', 'required' => false, 'options_source' => 'structural_professional_areas'],
File: src/Service/OrganizationalStructureViewBuilder.php
Match lines: 3
148| 'area_id' => $linkedAreaId,
463| 'area_id' => $areaIds[0] ?? null,
464| 'area_ids' => $areaIds,
File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/OrganizationalHealthService.php
Match lines: 13
1780| ct.id as area_id,
1822| $climaByArea[$row['area_id']] = [
1831| ct.id as area_id,
1871| $bemEstarByArea[$row['area_id']] = [
1881| ct.id as area_id,
1930| $ausenciaByArea[$row['area_id']] = [
1940| ct.id as area_id,
1984| $cuidadoByArea[$row['area_id']] = [
2935| ct.id as area_id,
3067| ct.id as area_id,
3101| $turnoverByArea[$row['area_id']] = [
3110| ct.id as area_id,
3145| $saudeByArea[$row['area_id']] = [
File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/ProjectionService.php
Match lines: 1
56| $whereClauses[] = "$memberAlias.area_id = :areaId";
File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/WelfareAbsenceService.php
Match lines: 6
2269| ct.id as area_id,
2289| ct.id as area_id,
2311| LEFT JOIN ausencias_por_area aa ON ba.area_id = aa.area_id
2419| ct.id as area_id,
2438| " . ($needsTeamJoinsLicencas ? 'ct_lic.id' : 'ct.id') . " as area_id,
2466| LEFT JOIN desligamentos_por_area da ON aa.area_id = da.area_id
File: src/Service/Products/PesquisaEstruturalBpmnService.php
Match lines: 1
1040| 'professionalAreaId' => $this->firstIntValue($data, ['professional_area_id', 'professionalAreaId', 'areaProfissionalId']),
File: src/Service/QuestionnaireProcessorService.php
Match lines: 4
1417| 'innovation_area_id' => $context['innovation_area_id'],
1483| 'innovation_area_id' => (int)$research->getId(),
14757| WHERE q.innovation_area_id = :innovationAreaId
14794| WHERE q.innovation_area_id = :innovationAreaId
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php
Match lines: 3
1500| (int) ($config['area_id'] ?? $config['company_area_id'] ?? $config['filter_value'] ?? 0)
1839| $areaId = (int) ($config['area_id'] ?? $config['company_area_id'] ?? $config['filter_value'] ?? 0);
1843| '[SSMA] notify_by_organizational_structure: nenhum membro para area_id=%s (occ=#%s)',
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaMemberOrganizationalManagementResolver.php
Match lines: 2
47| IDENTITY(memberArea.companyArea) AS area_id
55| $areaId = (int) ($memberAreaRow['area_id'] ?? 0);
File: src/Service/Tools/AssessmentInovacaoService.php
Match lines: 1
333| 'innovation_area_id' => null,
Request #66
deepseek-v4-flash
P:70.03K C:171 CR:67.58K CW:0
2487ms
Reasoning
GovernanceAuthorizationRepository has line 233 with 'area_id' => $aut->getArea()?->getId(). Let me view repository lines 200-260 to see the shape of the returned rows — this may be what feeds `aut_all` (the front-end catalog). If repository toArray includes area_id but controller strips it, or if the controller uses repository select that includes it. Let's read.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 300, "file_path": "src/Repository/GovernanceAuthorizationRepository.php", "start_line": 150}
Result
File: src/Repository/GovernanceAuthorizationRepository.php (Total lines: 277)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 150-277
150| }
151|
152| foreach ($valid as $cid => $m) {
153| if (isset($present[$cid])) {
154| continue;
155| }
156| $link = new GovernanceAuthorizationCollaborator();
157| $link->setGovernanceAuthorization($aut);
158| $link->setCompanyMember($m);
159| $aut->addColaboradorVinculo($link);
160| $em->persist($link);
161| }
162| }
163|
164| public function unlinkMember(GovernanceAuthorization $aut, CompanyMembers $member): void
165| {
166| $vinculo = null;
167| foreach ($aut->getColaboradoresVinculos() as $link) {
168| if ($link->getCompanyMember()?->getId() === $member->getId()) {
169| $vinculo = $link;
170| break;
171| }
172| }
173|
174| if (!$vinculo instanceof GovernanceAuthorizationCollaborator) {
175| throw new \InvalidArgumentException('Esta autorização não inclui este colaborador.');
176| }
177|
178| $em = $this->getEntityManager();
179| $aut->removeColaboradorVinculo($vinculo);
180| $em->remove($vinculo);
181| $em->flush();
182| }
183|
184| public function removeAutorizacao(int $id, Company $company): void
185| {
186| $aut = $this->findOneBy(['id' => $id, 'company' => $company]);
187| if (!$aut) {
188| throw new \InvalidArgumentException('Autorização não encontrada.');
189| }
190|
191| $em = $this->getEntityManager();
192| $em->remove($aut);
193| $em->flush();
194| }
195|
196| public function toArray(GovernanceAuthorization $aut): array
197| {
198| $membros = $aut->getColaboradoresMembros();
199| usort($membros, static fn (CompanyMembers $a, CompanyMembers $b) => ($a->getId() ?? 0) <=> ($b->getId() ?? 0));
200|
201| $titulo = $aut->getTitulo();
202| $descCat = AutorizacaoTipoCatalog::descricaoPorTitulo($titulo);
203| $descGravada = $aut->getDescricao();
204| $descExibicao = $descCat ?? ($descGravada !== null && $descGravada !== '' ? $descGravada : null);
205|
206| $validadeRaw = $aut->getValidade();
207| $validadeDias = $this->parseValidadeDias($validadeRaw);
208| $emitidaDate = $aut->getEmitida();
209| $validadeExpira = null;
210|
211| if ($validadeRaw !== null && $validadeRaw !== '') {
212| if ($this->isDateString($validadeRaw)) {
213| $validadeExpira = $validadeRaw;
214| } elseif ($validadeDias !== null && $emitidaDate !== null) {
215| $expira = (clone \DateTime::createFromInterface($emitidaDate))->modify('+' . $validadeDias . ' days');
216| $validadeExpira = $expira->format('Y-m-d');
217| }
218| }
219|
220| return [
221| 'id' => $aut->getId(),
222| 'titulo' => $titulo,
223| 'descricao' => $descGravada,
224| 'descricao_exibicao' => $descExibicao,
225| 'validade' => $validadeRaw,
226| 'validade_dias' => $validadeDias,
227| 'validade_expira' => $validadeExpira,
228| 'emitida' => $emitidaDate?->format('Y-m-d'),
229| 'status' => $aut->getStatus(),
230| 'requisitos' => $aut->getRequisitosList(),
231| 'contractor_requirement_dependencies' => $aut->getContractorRequirementDependencies(),
232| 'responsavel_id' => $aut->getResponsavelMember()?->getId(),
233| 'area_id' => $aut->getArea()?->getId(),
234| 'aprovador_id' => $aut->getAprovadorMember()?->getId(),
235| 'aprovador_role_id' => $aut->getAprovadorRole()?->getId(),
236| 'tipo' => $aut->getTipo(),
237| 'colaboradores' => array_map(fn (CompanyMembers $cm) => $this->colaboradorRow($cm), $membros),
238| ];
239| }
240|
241| private function parseValidadeDias(?string $val): ?int
242| {
243| if ($val === null || $val === '') {
244| return null;
245| }
246| if (ctype_digit($val)) {
247| return (int) $val;
248| }
249|
250| return null;
251| }
252|
253| /**
254| * Returns true when the string is a Y-m-d date (SSMA flow stores expiry date directly).
255| */
256| private function isDateString(?string $val): bool
257| {
258| if ($val === null || $val === '') {
259| return false;
260| }
261|
262| return (bool) preg_match('/^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$/', $val);
263| }
264|
265| private function colaboradorRow(CompanyMembers $cm): array
266| {
267| $row = $cm->__toArray();
268|
269| return [
270| 'id' => $row['id'],
271| 'name' => $row['name'] ?? '',
272| 'avatar' => $row['avatar'] ?? null,
273| 'email' => $row['email'] ?? null,
274| ];
275| }
276|}
277|
Request #67
deepseek-v4-flash
P:71.71K C:779 CR:70.14K CW:0
6846ms
Reasoning
OK! The repository's `toArray` DOES include the new keys: `area_id`, `aprovador_id`, `aprovador_role_id`, `tipo`. So the model branch already updated toArray. But GovernanceController's `loadAuthorizationsData` builds aut_all manually (not via toArray), and doesn't include those keys. Unless it uses a different repository method. So the hub payload `aut_all` in GovernanceController lacks those fields. But the repository's toArray method suggests some controller/endpoint uses it (e.g., the detail endpoint or save response uses toArray). Indeed, maybe the edit modal data comes from a detail endpoint response with toArray (authorization detail GET returns aut via toArray). Actually in create tab, resolveAutCriarPayload reads from AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG from `aut_all`, which lacks new fields... unless the detail endpoint is called prior. Hmm.
Wait, let's double-check: GovernanceController loadAuthorizationsData loop (lines 3310-3327) builds autAll without area/tipo/aprovador. So in the Governance hub the `aut_all` used by create tab has no new keys. But is Governance hub the route that renders create tab with these new modal fields? Both GovernanceController and SsmaController render the template. In SsmaController's own aut_all (lines 2486-2497) also lacks new keys. So in both rendering paths, aut_all lacks new keys.
But perhaps edit flow fetches detail separately? The edit click uses resolveAutCriarPayload with catalog first and data-aut fallback. Given catalog lacks fields, even data-aut (server rendered aut json) lacks them. So editing prefills blank for area/tipo/aprovador. This is a mismatch.
Unless... the create-tab data rows are built in a different data source: The `aut` variable used to build table rows and autActionsCell may come from a different `aut_rows`? No, the for loop over `aut_all` presumably. Let's confirm around line 700-760 of create tab to see iteration source.
Actually, the table grid in the create tab iterates over aut_all; the edit modal uses catalog from aut_all.
Given all these, I should confirm the claim by checking GovernanceController buildAuthorizationHubContext merges something like aut_all from loadAuthorizationsData. Yes, likely. And no area/aprovador serialization → edit cannot prefill. However, we must weigh the risk that the controller may be changed later in another PR (the PR scope states backend save "authorizationSave" — need to check the save flow). Let me find where `authorizationSave` and the save controller update entity fields (searching earlier found nothing with setArea etc. in src, meaning save controller maybe not updated → the new fields may not even be persisted by the endpoint!). But wait, entity has fields. Let me search for the save action handling payload (governance_authorization_save). Search route in config/routes_governance.yaml and its controller function.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/GovernanceController.php"], "search_text": "governance_authorization_save"}
Result
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["config/"], "search_text": "governance_authorization_save"}
Result
File: config/routes_governance.yaml Match lines: 1 230|governance_authorization_save:
Request #68
deepseek-v4-flash
P:72.54K C:86 CR:72.45K CW:0
1951ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 260, "file_path": "config/routes_governance.yaml", "start_line": 200}
Result
File: config/routes_governance.yaml (Total lines: 408)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 200-260
200| path: /manager/governance/badges/config
201| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::badgeConfigSave
202| methods: [POST]
203|
204|governance_badge_save:
205| path: /manager/governance/badges/save
206| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::badgeSave
207| methods: [POST]
208|
209|governance_badge_update:
210| path: /manager/governance/badges/{id}
211| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::badgeUpdate
212| methods: [PUT, POST]
213| requirements:
214| id: '\d+'
215|
216|governance_badge_remove:
217| path: /manager/governance/badges/{id}
218| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::badgeRemove
219| methods: [DELETE]
220| requirements:
221| id: '\d+'
222|
223|governance_badge_send:
224| path: /manager/governance/badges/{id}/send
225| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::badgeSendToMember
226| methods: [POST]
227| requirements:
228| id: '\d+'
229|
230|governance_authorization_save:
231| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/save
232| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::authorizationSave
233| methods: [POST]
234|
235|governance_authorization_remove:
236| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/{id}
237| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::authorizationRemove
238| methods: [DELETE]
239| requirements:
240| id: '\d+'
241|
242|governance_authorization_usage:
243| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/{id}/usage
244| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::authorizationUsage
245| methods: [GET]
246| requirements:
247| id: '\d+'
248|
249|governance_authorization_detail:
250| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/{id}/detail
251| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::authorizationDetail
252| methods: [GET]
253| requirements:
254| id: '\d+'
255|
256|governance_authorization_deactivate:
257| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/{id}/deactivate
258| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::authorizationDeactivate
259| methods: [POST]
260| requirements:
Request #69
deepseek-v4-flash
P:73.29K C:106 CR:72.58K CW:0
1730ms
Reasoning
Save is `GovernanceController::authorizationSave`. Let me check whether it persists area/aprovador/tipo fields. Search authorizationSave in GovernanceController.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/GovernanceController.php"], "search_text": "function authorizationSave"}
Result
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php Match lines: 1 1337| public function authorizationSave(Request $request): JsonResponse
Request #70
deepseek-v4-flash
P:73.44K C:88 CR:73.34K CW:0
1884ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 1560, "file_path": "src/Controller/GovernanceController.php", "start_line": 1337}
Result
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php (Total lines: 6066)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1337-1560
1337| public function authorizationSave(Request $request): JsonResponse
1338| {
1339| if (!$this->canManageAuthorizations()) {
1340| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Sem permissão.'], 403);
1341| }
1342|
1343| $company = $this->currentGovernanceCompany();
1344|
1345| if (!$company) {
1346| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Empresa não encontrada.'], 403);
1347| }
1348|
1349| $data = json_decode($request->getContent(), true) ?? [];
1350| $titulo = trim((string) ($data['titulo'] ?? ''));
1351| $desc = trim((string) ($data['descricao'] ?? ''));
1352|
1353| if ($titulo === '') {
1354| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Título da autorização é obrigatório.'], 400);
1355| }
1356| if ($desc === '') {
1357| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Descrição é obrigatória.'], 400);
1358| }
1359|
1360| $condExtras = [];
1361| foreach ($this->authorizationConditionConfig->getConditionsForFrontend($company) as $c) {
1362| if (!empty($c['active']) && is_string($c['nome'] ?? null)) {
1363| $nome = trim($c['nome']);
1364| if ($nome !== '') {
1365| $condExtras[] = $nome;
1366| }
1367| }
1368| }
1369| $requisitos = AutorizacaoRequisitoCatalog::normalizeFromRequest($data['requisitos'] ?? [], $condExtras);
1370| if ($requisitos === []) {
1371| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Selecione ao menos um requisito.'], 400);
1372| }
1373| $contractorRequirementDependencies = $this->normalizeContractorRequirementDependencies(
1374| $company,
1375| $data['contractor_requirement_dependencies'] ?? []
1376| );
1377|
1378| $responsavelId = (int) ($data['responsavel_id'] ?? 0);
1379| if ($responsavelId <= 0) {
1380| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Responsável pela autorização é obrigatório.'], 400);
1381| }
1382|
1383| try {
1384| $em = $this->entityManager;
1385| $id = !empty($data['id']) ? (int) $data['id'] : null;
1386|
1387| $responsavelMember = $em->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find($responsavelId);
1388| if (
1389| !$responsavelMember
1390| || $responsavelMember->getCompany()?->getId() !== $company->getId()
1391| || $responsavelMember->getIsRemoved()
1392| ) {
1393| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Responsável inválido.'], 400);
1394| }
1395|
1396| $beforeSnapshot = null;
1397| if ($id !== null) {
1398| $aut = $em->getRepository(GovernanceAuthorization::class)
1399| ->findOneBy(['id' => $id, 'company' => $company]);
1400| if (!$aut) {
1401| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Autorização não encontrada.'], 404);
1402| }
1403| $beforeSnapshot = [
1404| 'titulo' => (string) ($aut->getTitulo() ?? ''),
1405| 'descricao' => (string) ($aut->getDescricao() ?? ''),
1406| 'requisitos' => $aut->getRequisitosList(),
1407| 'contractor_requirement_dependencies' => $aut->getContractorRequirementDependencies(),
1408| 'responsavel_id' => (int) ($aut->getResponsavelMember()?->getId() ?? 0),
1409| ];
1410| } else {
1411| $aut = new GovernanceAuthorization();
1412| $aut->setCompany($company);
1413| }
1414|
1415| $aut->setTitulo($titulo);
1416| $aut->setDescricao($desc !== '' ? $desc : null);
1417| $aut->setRequisitos($requisitos);
1418| $aut->setContractorRequirementDependencies($contractorRequirementDependencies);
1419| $aut->setResponsavelMember($responsavelMember);
1420| if ($id === null) {
1421| $aut->setStatus('ativa');
1422| } elseif (array_key_exists('status', $data)) {
1423| $statusRaw = strtolower(trim((string) $data['status']));
1424| $aut->setStatus(in_array($statusRaw, ['inativa', 'inativo', '0', 'false'], true) ? 'inativa' : 'ativa');
1425| }
1426| $aut->setValidade(null);
1427| $aut->setEmitida(null);
1428|
1429| $em->persist($aut);
1430|
1431| /** @var GovernanceAuthorizationRepository $autRepo */
1432| $autRepo = $em->getRepository(GovernanceAuthorization::class);
1433|
1434| $em->flush();
1435|
1436| $actorMember = $this->currentGovernanceActorMember($company);
1437| $authTitle = (string) ($aut->getTitulo() ?: 'Autorização');
1438| if ($id === null) {
1439| $this->appendAuthorizationUserHistory(
1440| $company,
1441| (int) $aut->getId(),
1442| sprintf('criou a autorização (%s)', $authTitle),
1443| sprintf('Autorização %s criada', $authTitle),
1444| $actorMember,
1445| 'authorization_create',
1446| );
1447| } elseif ($beforeSnapshot !== null) {
1448| $editedFields = $this->detectAuthorizationEditedFields(
1449| $beforeSnapshot,
1450| $titulo,
1451| $desc,
1452| $requisitos,
1453| $contractorRequirementDependencies,
1454| $responsavelId,
1455| );
1456| if ($editedFields !== []) {
1457| $this->appendAuthorizationUserHistory(
1458| $company,
1459| (int) $aut->getId(),
1460| 'editou a autorização',
1461| 'Campos editados: ' . implode(', ', $editedFields),
1462| $actorMember,
1463| 'authorization_update',
1464| );
1465| }
1466| }
1467|
1468| return $this->json([
1469| 'success' => true,
1470| 'message' => $id !== null ? 'Autorização atualizada.' : 'Autorização criada.',
1471| 'aut' => $autRepo->toArray($aut),
1472| ]);
1473| } catch (\Exception $e) {
1474| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => $e->getMessage()], 400);
1475| }
1476| }
1477|
1478| public function authorizationRemove(Request $request, int $id): JsonResponse
1479| {
1480| if (!$this->canAccessAuthorizationSupervisorSurface()) {
1481| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Sem permissão.'], 403);
1482| }
1483|
1484| $company = $this->currentGovernanceCompany();
1485|
1486| if (!$company) {
1487| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Empresa não encontrada.'], 403);
1488| }
1489|
1490| $em = $this->entityManager;
1491| $aut = $em->getRepository(GovernanceAuthorization::class)
1492| ->findOneBy(['id' => $id, 'company' => $company]);
1493|
1494| if (!$aut) {
1495| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Autorização não encontrada.'], 404);
1496| }
1497|
1498| /*
1499| * Quando ?force=1, o usuário já confirmou que quer remover a autorização mesmo
1500| * com vínculos existentes (ex.: autorização Inativa que ainda tem colaboradores
1501| * vinculados). Pulamos a checagem de uso — o cascade do Doctrine remove
1502| * colaboradoresVinculos (cascade={"persist","remove"} + orphanRemoval) e o
1503| * onDelete=CASCADE no banco cuida das tabelas dependentes.
1504| */
1505| $forceParam = $request->query->get('force', $request->request->get('force'));
1506| $force = in_array((string) $forceParam, ['1', 'true', 'yes', 'on'], true);
1507|
1508| if (!$force && $this->authorizationUsageService->isInUse($aut)) {
1509| $status = strtolower((string) ($aut->getStatus() ?: 'ativa'));
1510| $canForce = $status !== 'ativa';
1511|
1512| return $this->json([
1513| 'success' => false,
1514| 'in_use' => true,
1515| 'can_force' => $canForce,
1516| 'status' => $status,
1517| 'message' => $canForce
1518| ? 'Esta autorização inativa ainda possui vínculos existentes. Confirme para removê-la e todos os vínculos definitivamente.'
1519| : 'Esta autorização já está sendo utilizada por colaboradores ou registros existentes e não pode ser removida. Para impedir novos usos, altere seu status para Inativa.',
1520| ], 422);
1521| }
1522|
1523| $this->governanceCasesHubService->purgeAuthorizationCases($company, $aut);
1524|
1525| $em->remove($aut);
1526| $em->flush();
1527|
1528| return $this->json(['success' => true, 'message' => 'Autorização removida.']);
1529| }
1530|
1531| public function authorizationUsage(int $id): JsonResponse
1532| {
1533| if (!$this->canAccessAuthorizationSupervisorSurface()) {
1534| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Sem permissão.'], 403);
1535| }
1536|
1537| $company = $this->currentGovernanceCompany();
1538| if (!$company) {
1539| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Empresa não encontrada.'], 403);
1540| }
1541|
1542| $aut = $this->entityManager->getRepository(GovernanceAuthorization::class)
1543| ->findOneBy(['id' => $id, 'company' => $company]);
1544| if (!$aut) {
1545| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Autorização não encontrada.'], 404);
1546| }
1547|
1548| $viewData = $this->buildAuthorizationViewData();
1549| $usage = $this->authorizationUsageService->getUsageSummary(
1550| $aut,
1551| $viewData['governanceVisibleMemberIds'] ?? null,
1552| );
1553|
1554| return $this->json([
1555| 'success' => true,
1556| 'in_use' => $usage['in_use'],
1557| 'collaborator_count' => $usage['collaborator_count'],
1558| 'visible_collaborator_count' => $usage['visible_collaborator_count'],
1559| 'hidden_collaborator_count' => $usage['hidden_collaborator_count'],
1560| 'badge_link_count' => $usage['badge_link_count'],
Request #71
deepseek-v4-flash
P:76.57K C:523 CR:73.47K CW:0
5362ms
Reasoning
Confirmed: `authorizationSave` in GovernanceController does NOT read/persist `area_id`, `aprovador_id`, `aprovador_role_id`, or `tipo` from the payload. The new entity columns exist but save ignores them; also hub aut_all doesn't serialize them. So sending area_id/aprovador_id/tipo in payload does nothing (silently dropped). The PR's own risk section says "no review, conferir se authorizationSave já grava esses campos nesta entrega" — indeed it doesn't. This is an important cross-file finding: the template change sends data that the current backend ignores, so area, tipo, and approvers won't be persisted; and even if persisted later, hub aut_all doesn't include them for edit prefill.
But the backend is out of the review group. Still the review rules say cross-file observations encouraged: "Cross-file observations within <review_files> are encouraged — look for inconsistencies, missing updates, and broken contracts across related files." So the template depends on a save endpoint contract that doesn't implement it. Great finding.
Now confirm canManageAuthorizations for the config tab - also there's the mismatch that index template uses ssmaCanManageConfig to show both requirements tab and config tab; config tab includes requirement stuff and permission for GET/POST of config is ROLE_MANAGER etc. The controller permission canManageAuthorizationConfig returns true for MANAGER/MANAGER_GESTOR even if the tab isn't shown by ssmaCanManageConfig? Actually ssmaCanManageConfig probably true for managers too. Since both tabs displayed under same permission, consistent with existing requirements tab being displayed under ssmaCanManageConfig as well. Wait, the requirements tab already was shown under `ssmaCanManageConfig` (pre-existing), not changed. So consistent.
Also note tab id label 'tab_auth_requisitos' label 'Criação de Requisitos' — unchanged.
Now double-check the autosave and SAVE_URL route exists: yes routes_governance has governance_authorization_config_save? Search for it in routes file.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["config/"], "search_text": "governance_authorization_config_save|governance_authorization_config_show"}
Result
No matches found
Request #72
deepseek-v4-flash
P:77.11K C:73 CR:77.06K CW:0
1650ms
Reasoning
Search for config route.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["config/"], "search_text": "authorizations/config"}
Result
File: config/routes_governance.yaml Match lines: 2 371| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/config 376| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/config
Request #73
deepseek-v4-flash
P:77.24K C:86 CR:77.06K CW:0
1749ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 380, "file_path": "config/routes_governance.yaml", "start_line": 355}
Result
File: config/routes_governance.yaml (Total lines: 408) IS_TRUNCATED: false LINE_RANGE: 355-380 355|governance_authorization_conditions_get: 356| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/conditions 357| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::authorizationConditionsGet 358| methods: [GET] 359| 360|governance_authorization_conditions_save: 361| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/conditions 362| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::authorizationConditionsSave 363| methods: [POST] 364| 365|governance_authorization_condition_usage: 366| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/conditions/usage 367| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::authorizationConditionUsage 368| methods: [GET] 369| 370|governance_authorization_config_get: 371| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/config 372| controller: App\Controller\Governance\GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController::show 373| methods: [GET] 374| 375|governance_authorization_config_save: 376| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/config 377| controller: App\Controller\Governance\GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController::save 378| methods: [POST] 379| 380|member_governance_pendencies_index:
Request #74
deepseek-v4-flash
P:77.66K C:174 CR:77.31K CW:0
2916ms
Reasoning
Route exists with controller. So route contract ok.
Now check GET vars used by index template for the settings tab hydration: aut_authorization_approver_members/roles etc. provided by hub. Let's verify the GovernanceController hub view passes them (in buildAuthorizationHubContext). Search GovernanceController for 'aut_authorization_approver_members'.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/GovernanceController.php"], "search_text": "aut_authorization_approver_members|aut_authorization_use_members|aut_company_areas|aut_authorization_types"}
Result
No matches found
Request #75
deepseek-v4-flash
P:77.85K C:218 CR:77.82K CW:0
3186ms
Reasoning
Uh oh! GovernanceController doesn't reference those variables at all. So the hub (GovernanceController::buildAuthorizationHubContext) doesn't inject config vars. Then rendering the new settings tab (included unconditionally inside ssmaCanManageConfig block in index.html.twig) will produce empty JS init `initialTypes = []`, etc., because vars not defined. Wait, the variables default to [] so the settings tab would just show empty state, always. Unless the rendering path is SsmaController, which may pass them? Search SsmaController for those variables.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/SsmaController.php"], "search_text": "aut_authorization_approver_members|aut_authorization_use_members|aut_company_areas|aut_authorization_types"}
Result
No matches found
Request #76
deepseek-v4-flash
P:78.08K C:236 CR:77.95K CW:0
2715ms
Reasoning
Neither controller injects config hub vars. But maybe the vars come from `_shared_module_assets` or a shared component include that queries config? The settings tab template uses `aut_authorization_types`, `aut_authorization_use_members`, `aut_authorization_use_roles`, `aut_authorization_approver_members`, `aut_authorization_approver_roles`, `aut_company_roles`, `allMembers`. Where do they come from in index render context? Could the GovernanceController hub merge `$this->authorizationConfigService->getViewData($company)`? We searched literal variable name in GovernanceController and found nothing. Let me search buildAuthorizationHubContext to view how it merges and maybe merges config service data.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/GovernanceController.php"], "search_text": "function buildAuthorizationHubContext"}
Result
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php Match lines: 1 1288| private function buildAuthorizationHubContext(): array
Request #77
deepseek-v4-flash
P:78.36K C:88 CR:78.21K CW:0
2193ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 1336, "file_path": "src/Controller/GovernanceController.php", "start_line": 1288}
Result
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php (Total lines: 6066)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1288-1336
1288| private function buildAuthorizationHubContext(): array
1289| {
1290| $viewData = $this->buildAuthorizationViewData();
1291|
1292| $company = $this->currentGovernanceCompany();
1293|
1294| $autData = $company
1295| ? $this->loadAuthorizationsData(
1296| $company,
1297| $viewData['allMembers'],
1298| $viewData['teams'] ?? [],
1299| $viewData['governanceVisibleMemberIds'] ?? null
1300| )
1301| : [
1302| 'aut_rows' => [],
1303| 'aut_all' => [],
1304| 'aut_ativas' => 0,
1305| 'aut_vencidas' => 0,
1306| 'aut_a_vencer' => 0,
1307| 'aut_colabs_sem_aut' => 0,
1308| 'aut_perc_conformidade' => 0,
1309| 'aut_teams_by_status' => [],
1310| 'aut_kpi_total' => 0,
1311| 'aut_kpi_ativas' => 0,
1312| 'aut_kpi_inativas' => 0,
1313| 'aut_kpi_colaboradores' => 0,
1314| 'aut_alertas' => [],
1315| 'aut_chart_data' => ['vencidas' => 0, 'proximos_30' => 0, 'dias_31_60' => 0, 'dias_61_90' => 0],
1316| 'aut_expired_by_team' => [],
1317| 'aut_requisitos_catalog' => AutorizacaoRequisitoCatalog::labelsOrdered(),
1318| ];
1319|
1320| $autConditions = $company
1321| ? $this->authorizationConditionConfig->getConditionsForFrontend($company)
1322| : [];
1323| $contractorRequirements = $company
1324| ? array_values(array_filter(
1325| $this->contractorRequirementService->listForFrontend($company),
1326| static fn (array $requirement): bool => ($requirement['active'] ?? true) !== false
1327| ))
1328| : [];
1329|
1330| return array_merge($viewData, $autData, $this->authorizationConfigHubQuery->build($company), [
1331| 'aut_conditions' => $autConditions,
1332| 'aut_classif_catalog' => GovernanceAuthorizationConditionConfigService::classificacoesPorTipo(),
1333| 'aut_contractor_requirements' => $contractorRequirements,
1334| ]);
1335| }
1336|
Request #78
deepseek-v4-flash
P:79.14K C:221 CR:78.34K CW:0
2482ms
Reasoning
Line 1330: `array_merge($viewData, $autData, $this->authorizationConfigHubQuery->build($company), [...])`. So the hub DOES include config hub query output (keys like aut_authorization_types, aut_company_roles etc.), which contains `aut_authorization_approver_members` etc. So my earlier code_search for those exact names in GovernanceController returned nothing because the key is produced by the service object `authorizationConfigHubQuery->build($company)`. Fine. So initial hydration variables are provided for the Governance hub route.
Wait, but `aut_company_areas`? Need to check whether GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery returns aut_company_areas (used by modal for area select). Let's read hub query service.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery.php"}
Result
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery.php (Total lines: 77)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-77
1|<?php
2|
3|declare(strict_types=1);
4|
5|namespace App\Service\Governance;
6|
7|use App\Entity\Company;
8|use App\Entity\CompanyArea;
9|use App\Repository\CompanyAreaRepository;
10|
11|final class GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery
12|{
13| public function __construct(
14| private GovernanceAuthorizationConfigService $configService,
15| private CompanyAreaRepository $areaRepository,
16| ) {
17| }
18|
19| /**
20| * @return array{
21| * aut_authorization_types: list<string>,
22| * aut_authorization_use_members: bool,
23| * aut_authorization_use_roles: bool,
24| * aut_authorization_approver_members: list<array{id: int, name: string, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}>,
25| * aut_authorization_approver_roles: list<array{id: int, name: string, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}>,
26| * aut_company_roles: list<array{id: int, name: string}>,
27| * aut_company_areas: list<array{id: int|null, name: string}>
28| * }
29| */
30| public static function emptyView(): array
31| {
32| return [
33| 'aut_authorization_types' => [],
34| 'aut_authorization_use_members' => true,
35| 'aut_authorization_use_roles' => false,
36| 'aut_authorization_approver_members' => [],
37| 'aut_authorization_approver_roles' => [],
38| 'aut_company_roles' => [],
39| 'aut_company_areas' => [],
40| ];
41| }
42|
43| /**
44| * @return array{
45| * aut_authorization_types: list<string>,
46| * aut_authorization_use_members: bool,
47| * aut_authorization_use_roles: bool,
48| * aut_authorization_approver_members: list<array{id: int, name: string, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}>,
49| * aut_authorization_approver_roles: list<array{id: int, name: string, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}>,
50| * aut_company_roles: list<array{id: int, name: string}>,
51| * aut_company_areas: list<array{id: int|null, name: string}>
52| * }
53| */
54| public function build(?Company $company): array
55| {
56| if (!$company instanceof Company) {
57| return self::emptyView();
58| }
59|
60| $areas = [];
61| foreach ($this->areaRepository->findForCompany($company, true) as $area) {
62| if (!$area instanceof CompanyArea) {
63| continue;
64| }
65|
66| $areas[] = [
67| 'id' => $area->getId(),
68| 'name' => (string) $area->getName(),
69| ];
70| }
71|
72| return array_merge($this->configService->getViewData($company), [
73| 'aut_company_areas' => $areas,
74| ]);
75| }
76|}
77|
Request #79
deepseek-v4-flash
P:80.24K C:153 CR:79.36K CW:0
1956ms
Reasoning
Good. So hub vars provided for Governance route, including aut_company_areas.
Now the SsmaController render (line 739) does `array_merge($viewData, $autData, [...])` — does it include the config hub query? Read lines around 700-780 of SsmaController.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 790, "file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 660}
Result
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 27759)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 660-790
660| $location,
661| $collabName
662| ),
663| NotificationsCenter::TYPE_PROBLEM,
664| $sender,
665| $url
666| );
667| } catch (\Throwable $e) {
668| $this->ssmaLogger->warning('[SSMA] Falha ao notificar supervisão do Direito de Recusa: ' . $e->getMessage());
669| }
670| }
671| }
672| }
673|
674| public function saveDireitoRecusaConfig(Request $request): JsonResponse
675| {
676| if (!($this->canManageSsmaConfig())) {
677| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Sem permissão para editar configurações.'], 403);
678| }
679|
680| $company = $this->getSsmaCompany();
681| if (!$company) {
682| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Empresa não encontrada.'], 400);
683| }
684|
685| $payload = json_decode($request->getContent() ?: '{}', true);
686| if (!is_array($payload)) {
687| $payload = $request->request->all();
688| }
689|
690| $flowA = array_map('intval', (array) ($payload['flow_a_member_ids'] ?? []));
691| $flowB = array_map('intval', (array) ($payload['flow_b_member_ids'] ?? []));
692|
693| try {
694| $this->ssmaRefusalRightService->saveConfig($company, $flowA, $flowB);
695| } catch (\RuntimeException $e) {
696| $this->ssmaLogger->error('[SSMA] Direito de Recusa config schema/runtime: ' . $e->getMessage());
697|
698| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => $e->getMessage()], 503);
699| } catch (\Throwable $e) {
700| $this->ssmaLogger->error('[SSMA] Falha ao salvar config Direito de Recusa: ' . $e->getMessage());
701|
702| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Não foi possível salvar as configurações.'], 500);
703| }
704|
705| return $this->json(['success' => true, 'message' => 'Configurações salvas.']);
706| }
707|
708| public function autorizacaoIndex(): Response
709| {
710| if (!$this->canAccessSsmaAuthorizationHub()) {
711| throw $this->createAccessDeniedException('Sem permissão para acessar Autorizações SSMA.');
712| }
713|
714| $viewData = $this->buildSsmaViewData();
715|
716| /** @var User|null $user */
717| $user = $this->getUser();
718| $company = $this->getSsmaCompany();
719|
720| $autData = $company
721| ? $this->loadAutorizacoesData($company, $viewData['allMembers'], $viewData['teams'] ?? [])
722| : [
723| 'aut_rows' => [],
724| 'aut_all' => [],
725| 'aut_ativas' => 0,
726| 'aut_vencidas' => 0,
727| 'aut_colabs_sem_aut' => 0,
728| 'aut_perc_conformidade' => 0,
729| 'aut_alertas' => [],
730| 'aut_chart_data' => ['vencidas' => 0, 'proximos_30' => 0, 'dias_31_60' => 0, 'dias_61_90' => 0],
731| 'aut_expired_by_team' => [],
732| 'aut_requisitos_catalog' => AutorizacaoRequisitoCatalog::labelsOrdered(),
733| ];
734|
735| $autConditions = $company
736| ? $this->ssmaAutConditionConfig->getConditionsForFrontend($company)
737| : [];
738|
739| return $this->render('governance/authorization/index.html.twig', array_merge($viewData, $autData, [
740| 'aut_conditions' => $autConditions,
741| 'aut_classif_catalog' => GovernanceAuthorizationConditionConfigService::classificacoesPorTipo(),
742| ]));
743| }
744|
745| public function causeTreeIndex(): Response
746| {
747| if (!$this->canAccessSsmaCauseTreeHub()) {
748| throw $this->createAccessDeniedException('Sem permissão para acessar Análise de Causas SSMA.');
749| }
750|
751| $viewData = $this->buildSsmaViewData();
752|
753| /** @var User|null $user */
754| $user = $this->getUser();
755| $company = $this->getSsmaCompany();
756| $companyId = $company ? (int) $company->getId() : 0;
757| // TODO: Replace this temporary occurrence source when the cause tree back-end exposes its own dedicated occurrence lookup endpoint.
758| $occurrenceOptions = $this->buildCauseTreeOccurrenceOptions($viewData['occurrences'] ?? []);
759| $cards = $companyId > 0 ? $this->ssmaCauseTreeService->getTreeCards($companyId) : [];
760| if ($company instanceof Company && $user instanceof User) {
761| $cards = $this->filterCauseTreeCardsForOccurrenceHubScope($cards, $company, $user, $viewData['occurrences'] ?? []);
762| }
763|
764| return $this->render('ssma/cause_tree/index.html.twig', array_merge($viewData, [
765| 'pageTitle' => 'árvore de Causas',
766| 'causeTreeCards' => $this->buildCauseTreeCardViewData($cards),
767| 'causeTreeOccurrences' => $occurrenceOptions,
768| 'causeTreeManageRoutes' => [
769| 'create' => $this->generateUrl('ssma_cause_tree_tree_create'),
770| 'updateTemplate' => str_replace('/0', '/__ID__', $this->generateUrl('ssma_cause_tree_tree_update', ['id' => 0])),
771| 'deleteTemplate' => str_replace('/0', '/__ID__', $this->generateUrl('ssma_cause_tree_tree_delete', ['id' => 0])),
772| ],
773| ]));
774| }
775|
776| public function causeTreeView(Request $request): Response
777| {
778| if (!$this->canAccessSsmaCauseTreeHub()) {
779| throw $this->createAccessDeniedException('Sem permissão para acessar Análise de Causas SSMA.');
780| }
781|
782| $viewData = $this->buildSsmaViewData();
783|
784| /** @var User|null $user */
785| $user = $this->getUser();
786| $company = $this->getSsmaCompany();
787| $companyId = $company ? (int) $company->getId() : 0;
788| $treeId = $this->resolveCauseTreeTreeId($request);
789| if ($company instanceof Company && $user instanceof User && $treeId !== null && $treeId > 0) {
790| $this->assertCauseTreeIdAccessibleForHubUser($company, $user, $treeId, $viewData['occurrences'] ?? []);
Request #80
deepseek-v4-flash
P:82.22K C:2.71K CR:80.38K CW:0
23866ms
Reasoning
The SSMA autorizacaoIndex (SsmaController) renders `governance/authorization/index.html.twig` WITHOUT the authorizationConfigHubQuery merge (no aut_authorization_types, aut_company_areas etc.). This means the modal of the create tab (area/aprovador/tipo selects) and the settings tab under the SSMA route will get empty arrays/defaults — so the new mandatory selects area and tipo would be empty, making creating impossible for users of the SSMA hub "Autorizações". Hmm — but wait, ssma hub route might show the create tab under ssmaCanCreateAuthorization; aut_all passed; but no config vars. So `aut_company_areas` empty → Área select empty; but new validation makes area mandatory → users can't save in SSMA module. However, does the SSMA "Autorizações" hub still get used? The authorization module may be the governance module; the branch summary says "Central de Governança → Autorizações". But both controllers render this same template. This is another contract mismatch for SSMA path. This is a strong cross-file observation.
However, given SSMA canManageAuthorizationConfig permission? Under the SSMA hub, the settings tab shows if `ssmaCanManageConfig` true. If config hub vars are missing in SSMA path, the Settings tab will appear (tab visible) but with empty initial data and SAVE_URL posting to governance config controller with currentGovernanceCompany resolution. Might still work since controller resolves company from request attributes or session workspace... but initial types empty → user might think settings not persisted. Anyway this SSMA path issue exists only if the SSMA hub is still accessible.
But careful: since review scope only includes template files, and the hub data for governance route is fine, we must be careful in claiming a template bug if the feature is targeted at governance hub. But SsmaController::autorizacaoIndex clearly renders the same template used by the settings tab. Let me verify index page header shows "Autorizações & Requisitos" — yes both controllers render same index.html.twig.
This is exactly what the review instructions classify as "Cross-file observations ... missing updates, broken contracts". I'll flag:
1. Save endpoint ignores new payload fields (area_id, tipo, aprovador) — persistence gap. Actually wait, maybe the entity's setters get called by some other layer? No. authorizationSave doesn't call setArea/setTipo/setAprovador... so new fields are dropped silently.
Wait, is there another code path that persists from modal? No; the modal posts to SALVAR_URL governance_authorization_save which is authorizationSave. So the fields never saved. Unless the branch intended to include authorizationSave modifications in the merged model branch but didn't. So this diff's modal sends fields that backend drops. Combined with backend requirement of area/tipo? AuthorizationSave doesn't require area/tipo. So it still saves but ignores new fields. That means the core purpose of this UI PR — record area, tipo, aprovador in creation — is not achieved.
But since save endpoint code may be changed by another merge later, we should still flag now: the template change is based on a backend contract that doesn't yet exist in current code, so the new data won't be persisted nor displayed in edit (hub aut_all missing those fields too). Actually repository toArray includes them (from model branch), but controllers that serve aut_all build rows manually and omit; except the detail endpoint uses buildAuthorizationDetailPayload maybe using toArray? Let's check authorizationDetail uses repository toArray? Search buildAuthorizationDetailPayload usage lines ~3369-3450 to see fields. Not necessary: editing uses catalog/aut_all, not detail.
Wait, is the modal prefilled from catalog or from server-rendered row data? For edit, from AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG (aut_all) — hub page payload. It lacks area_id etc. So even if save worked, editing won't restore. Confirm again GovernanceController's autAll: fields keys at 3310-3327 don't include area/aprovador/tipo. Yes.
Let's confirm SsmaController's autAll keys at 2486-2497 no new fields — yes.
So two findings:
A. Modal payload (area_id, tipo, aprovador_id, aprovador_role_id) is not consumed by authorizationSave; fields won't persist.
B. hub aut_all in both Governance and SSMA controllers doesn't serialize area_id/tipo/aprovador for edit prefill; also the SSMA hub context doesn't pass aut_authorization_types/aut_company_areas etc. at all, making the new mandatory selects empty in the SSMA Autorizações module (would make creation impossible there) and the config tab empty.
These are cross-file contract breaks from the template diff; valuable to report. Both belong to category "bug" with severity high or medium. However, we should be careful: is it possible that the template diff branch expects these backend changes to land as part of the same merge and simply not yet in the current tree we are reviewing (the branch head)? The branch head as tested should include them. Since we review on the merged result (target state), these gaps are valid.
Also: The visible "Configurações" tab for users with ssmaCanManageConfig: under Governance path fine.
Now for SsmaController permission: does it allow users without governance config perms? The config tab gets shown if `ssmaCanManageConfig` true, and the controller's save checks canManageAuthorizationConfig. OK.
Now the CSRF observation: the conditions tab already posts without CSRF token, as does create modal. So project doesn't send csrf on these JSON autosave endpoints; but the user rules say it should. The backend config save controller also doesn't call isCsrfTokenValid. Since both pre-existing patterns omit CSRF, flagging new code may be redundant but is a genuine security concern aligned to mandatory rule. I'll report as a security medium for the new endpoint — because it changes default approvers of the whole company and types, which then govern approval flows. Even if the existing codebase pattern is similar, the new config save endpoint deserves CSRF protection or at least origin/samesite validation. I'll phrase it carefully.
Also the autosave issue: The settings autosave has debounce 400 ms without flush on unload — data loss possibility. Medium. Also since both tabs can be open? Not a big issue. But I'll include as low.
Now XSS & |raw for JSON embed: The existing codebase pattern uses `{{ aut_all|json_encode|raw }}` already (line 924). The new code follows existing pattern. The escaping concern is low since PHP json_encode escapes / (producing <\/script>). Actually does json_encode escape `<`, `>`, `&`, `'`? By default only `\/` is escaped (so `</script>` becomes `<\/script>`). So `</script>` within string becomes `<\/script>`, safe against closing the script tag. However characters like `</script>` unescaped? json_encode default: escape slashes only (JSON_HEX_TAG not set). It encodes `"` and backslash and control chars and forward slash? Actually default flags = 0; forward slash IS escaped by default (`\/`). Wait, does json_encode escape forward slashes by default? Yes: `json_encode("</script>")` → `"<\/script>"`. Yes default escapes slashes. So `</script>` is escaped to `<\/script>`; but `<!--`? If data contains `<!--` it could comment out following code but won't break out. Also `</script>` after the JSON closes? Since JSON serializes to a string with quotes and escapes, script tag break is prevented by slash escaping. So risk limited. The review instruction #2 says never use |raw without sanitization for user-provided values embedded into DOM; but json_encode escapes HTML special characters only if flags; without JSON_HEX_TAG, `&` `<` etc are still fine for JS string context? XSS via JSON in script tags generally occurs through U+2028/2029 line separators (JSON_HEX_...) and via `</script>` (blocked by slash escaping). `<` characters remain literal, e.g., name "A<b>B" becomes `"A<b>B"` inside script — does that create an HTML tag within script? `<b>` inside a <script> element is CDATA; browsers parse <script> content as raw text until `</script>`, so `<b>` safe. So json_encode without flags is mostly safe. Since project pattern uses it elsewhere, I'll downgrade to low/documentation; but rule #2 says strict. I'll include as low.
God template concern is priority #1 per user rules and clearly applies: two new files with ~1,200 + 360 lines of inline CSS/JS in Twig. Also duplicates CSS chips across the two files. Also the create tab's new JS further expands it. High weight.
Now components reuse: A lighter low.
Let me also verify there is no `<script>` inside _modal_add_approver (only style block). Actually the JS is in settings tab only. Good.
Now confirm line numbers/anchors for comments in each file:
index.html.twig:
- The settings tab include & tabs (high god-template concern and tab duplicate) — We can anchor the settings include comment to lines 70-74 or the tab declaration lines 27-31. For maintainability concern on new tab content, comment on lines 28-30 (tab) or the include lines 70-74. I'll anchor lines 70-74? But the issue here is the referenced template being huge (content in another file). I'll instead anchor at the tab def (lines 27-30) plus maybe separate. Or choose to include this in a broader message anchored at include lines 70-74 for the settings file inclusion? Better: This issue is best anchored in the new file itself. index.html.twig needs no comment other than tab.
Wait, issue #3 (visualizar no permission) was moot, so maybe no comment on index.html.twig except maybe to note that the new tab shows under ssmaCanManageConfig which also gates config save permission (the two diverge in controller canManageAuthorizationConfig permitting managers via ROLE_... while ssmaCanManageConfig could be false for a MANAGER? Actually controller canManage returns true for managers regardless. But template shows tab only if ssmaCanManageConfig. So there could be managers (ROLE_MANAGER) who do not have ssmaCanManageConfig true → they can't access config UI even though API allows. The same pattern already existed for the requisitos tab (under ssmaCanManageConfig too), so not a regression introduced by diff. Skip.
Do we need any comment on index.html.twig at all? The diff adds the settings tab with duplicated panel hidden by defaultAutTab logic. Also includes the modal in hoist list. Seems fine. We can leave index without comment or note that the settings template is huge (already anchored there).
Actually we might comment on index.html.twig: potential duplication of defaultAutTab logic is existing. Skip index comment.
Now prepare the code comments. For each comment, pick category, severity, content in pt-BR, first sentence simple.
Given the review group files, we should attach:
1. _tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig: god template/JS in Twig (high, maintainability). Anchor: first lines of `<script>` or the big file start. Use anchor lines 293-295: the `<script>`... Actually anchor on: ` var initialTypes = {{ aut_authorization_types|default([])|json_encode|raw }};` includes also the XSS-ish anchor. Hmm we need anchor as unique code. Let's pick anchor:
```
<script>
(function () {
var SAVE_URL = {{ path('governance_authorization_config_save')|json_encode|raw }};
```
For the comment matching, existing_code should match consecutive added lines in the diff text. Let me verify those lines exist verbatim: lines 293-295 in the diff new file: yes.
2. CSRF comment anchor: the persist ajax lines 573-579? Let me get exact from file. Read lines 560-600.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 608, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig", "start_line": 540}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig (Total lines: 1224)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 540-608
540| return [];
541| }
542| return Array.prototype.map.call(approverList.querySelectorAll('.gov-auth-approver-row[data-kind="' + kind + '"]'), function (row) {
543| var allAreas = row.getAttribute('data-all-areas') === '1';
544| return {
545| id: parseInt(row.getAttribute('data-id'), 10) || 0,
546| all_areas: allAreas,
547| area_keys: allAreas ? [] : collectAreaKeys(row)
548| };
549| }).filter(function (item) {
550| return item.id > 0;
551| });
552| }
553|
554| function collectPayload() {
555| return {
556| authorization_types: currentTypes(),
557| use_members: !!(useMembers && useMembers.checked),
558| use_roles: !!(useRoles && useRoles.checked),
559| approver_members: collectApproverAssignments('member'),
560| approver_roles: collectApproverAssignments('role')
561| };
562| }
563|
564| function notifyError(message) {
565| if (typeof showToast === 'function') {
566| showToast(message || 'Não foi possível salvar as configurações.', 'Erro', 'fas fa-times', 'bg-danger');
567| }
568| }
569|
570| function persist() {
571| var seq = ++saveSeq;
572| var payload = collectPayload();
573| window.jQuery.ajax({
574| url: SAVE_URL,
575| method: 'POST',
576| contentType: 'application/json; charset=UTF-8',
577| data: JSON.stringify(payload)
578| }).done(function (res) {
579| if (seq !== saveSeq) {
580| return;
581| }
582| if (!res || !res.success) {
583| notifyError(res && res.message);
584| return;
585| }
586| if (typeof window.ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes === 'function') {
587| window.ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes(res.authorization_types || payload.authorization_types);
588| }
589| if (typeof window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers === 'function') {
590| window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers(res.approver_members || payload.approver_members);
591| }
592| }).fail(function (xhr) {
593| if (seq !== saveSeq) {
594| return;
595| }
596| var res = xhr && xhr.responseJSON;
597| notifyError(res && res.message);
598| });
599| }
600|
601| function scheduleSave() {
602| if (skipSave) {
603| return;
604| }
605| clearTimeout(saveTimer);
606| saveTimer = setTimeout(persist, 400);
607| }
608|
Request #81
deepseek-v4-flash
P:85.66K C:1.13K CR:84.86K CW:0
11093ms
Reasoning
Good.
Now note: CSRF - existing conditions tab doesn't send CSRF either, and other save endpoints don't. Still I'll include comment, medium, security.
Now the "duplicate CSS" observation within this same file & modal file; part of god-template comment.
3. Autosave loss without beforeunload flush: anchor at `function scheduleSave` lines 601-607 or persist. Category other/low? The seq protection means late responses ignored. Debounced save - if user leaves page before 400ms, lost. Medium-low. And no optimistic loading. I'll include in a low comment.
4. ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers empty function anchor in create tab at 2419-2421:
```
window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers = function () {
};
```
5. The XSS-related |raw issue is already touched in god-template/raw comment. I'll mention it within the settings comment or create separate. Let me be careful not to overload. I'll make it one line low inside the file about data from users (`catalogMembers`) printed raw... Actually more importantly: `name`, `position`, `team_names`, and `type labels` are all displayed through DOM APIs textContent; the raw JSON injection is within <script>. Since json_encode escapes `/`, `</script>` is safe. But `<!--` and other? no. Let me not make it an independent issue; note briefly in the big settings comment and maybe skip the XSS comment since create's new raw JSON only routes (paths) — no user content added; initialTypes initialApproverMembers all from config which are user created types (labels) - could contain `</script>`? user types are input via text field maxlength 80; if type label is `</script><script>alert(1)</script>`, json_encode escapes `/` so output: `"<\/script><script>alert(1)<\/script>"`. HTML parser won't close the script because sequence is `<\/script>` not `</script>`. Safe. Names from members could also contain characters; same escaping. So low concern only. Skip as separate comment.
6. Payload contract finding: anchor at create tab lines 2065-2068 (payload) - bug severity high. Content: O backend authorizationSave (fora do diff) não consome esses campos: não persiste; também aut_all hub não inclui; edição não traz de volta; e na rota SSMA as variáveis de catálogo nem são passadas. Suggest synchronize backend or revert UI.
7. Fields not restored on edit: Actually the payload comment can encompass this (since the same root cause). But separately the hub aut_all issue - comment could be anchored at applyAutCriarModalFields area line 1720. Might merge into one comment at lines 2065-2068? The instruction says pinpoint comment lines. One comment can cover multiple related aspects.
8. Visualizar button: drop (no-op). Actually we shouldn't comment on it.
9. index.html.twig comment? Not necessary.
10. Modal partial duplication of CSS anchor: skip.
So final code comment set:
- settings file: god template (high, maintainability) anchor `<script>` lines.
- settings file: CSRF (medium, security) anchor ajax persist block.
- settings file: autosave loss/empty stub function reference? Actually empty function comment at create tab.
- create file: payload not consumed by backend + modal contract (high, bug).
- create file: empty `ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers` stub (low, maintainability).
- modal file: god template too (this file has CSS 300 lines) and duplicated chip CSS (part of comment). Anchor `<style>`.
Let me also double check that creating an authorization without permission is handled: canManageAuthorizations backend etc. fine.
One more thing: the autosave calls `window.jQuery.ajax` while other files use `$.ajax`; consistent enough.
Also - the `settings` file inline CSS uses `color-mix(in srgb, var(--app-brand-primary,#186073) 16%, transparent)`. Browser support: color-mix modern. Fine.
Now severity double-check for the payload/backend mismatch (high): The PR's stated purpose is that creation records area/tipo/aprovador; if save endpoint ignores, data is lost on every creation (but backend doesn't validate new mandatory fields, so user can still save with area required in the UI, but the field won't persist). So yes data silently lost. Also aut_all missing prevents re-display. High severity (functional). Anchor: payload lines 2065-2068.
Actually wait, I should double check whether there's some Doctrine event or a different service that could read data['area_id'] etc. to persist when the entity is saved. Search GovernanceAuthorization setArea/getArea usage across src.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/"], "search_text": "setArea\\(|setAprovador|setTipo\\(|getTipo\\(", "use_perl_regexp": true}
Result
Note: The results have been truncated. Only showing first 100 results.
File: src/Command/ImportContractorProviderCompaniesCommand.php
Match lines: 1
224| ->setTipo($tipoKey)
File: src/Controller/Api/AttendanceListController.php
Match lines: 1
410| $participant->setArea($participantArea);
File: src/Controller/CognitiveAssessmentController.php
Match lines: 1
1185| $answer->setArea($question->getArea());
File: src/Controller/CrmLeadsController.php
Match lines: 2
8144| $captureForm->setArea($area);
8646| $captureForm->setArea($area);
File: src/Controller/ExperienciaprofissionalController.php
Match lines: 2
47| $entity->setArea($data['area'] ?? null);
124| $entity->setArea($data['area'] ?? null);
File: src/Controller/ProcessController.php
Match lines: 1
1931| 'type' => $ua->getTipo(),
File: src/Controller/SpecialistController.php
Match lines: 4
6965| $previousExperience->setArea($previousExperienceData['area']);
6975| $experience->setArea($previousExperienceData['area']);
6978| $experience->setArea($previousExperienceData['area']);
7161| $experience->setArea($previousExperienceData['area'] ?? null);
File: src/Controller/TemplatesController.php
Match lines: 4
1963| $experience->setArea($previousExperienceData['area'] ?? null);
2352| $previousExperience->setArea($previousExperienceData['area']);
2363| $experience->setArea($previousExperienceData['area']);
2366| $experience->setArea($previousExperienceData['area']);
File: src/Controller/UserAchievementController.php
Match lines: 7
42| $achievement->setTipo($tipo);
72| 'tipo' => $achievement->getTipo(),
106| 'tipo' => $achievement->getTipo(),
152| if (isset($data['tipo']) && $data['tipo'] !== $achievement->getTipo()) {
154| $achievement->setTipo($data['tipo']);
158| $tipo = $achievement->getTipo();
192| 'tipo' => $achievement->getTipo(),
File: src/Controller/UserController.php
Match lines: 3
2846| $expectativadecontratacao->setArea(array_filter($areas));
2848| $expectativadecontratacao->setArea([]);
6233| 'tipo' => $achievement->getTipo(),
File: src/Controller/UserProfileSkillController.php
Match lines: 1
54| $skill->setTipo($tipoSkill);
File: src/DataFixtures/EsocialAgentesNocivosEAtividadesFixtures.php
Match lines: 2
21| $existingData->setTipo($data['tipo']);
27| $entity->setTipo($data['tipo']);
File: src/Domains/FileManagement/v2/Entity/AttendanceListParticipant.php
Match lines: 1
100| public function setArea(?string $area): void
File: src/Entity/AlertSchedulerTelemetry.php
Match lines: 1
124| public function getTipo(): string
File: src/Entity/CaptureForm.php
Match lines: 1
151| public function setArea(?string $area): self
File: src/Entity/CognitiveAssessmentAnswer.php
Match lines: 1
135| public function setArea(string $area): self
File: src/Entity/CognitiveAssessmentQuestion.php
Match lines: 1
87| public function setArea(string $area): self
File: src/Entity/Contractor/ContractorDocumentRequirement.php
Match lines: 1
193| public function setArea(?string $area): self
File: src/Entity/Contractor/ContractorProviderCompany.php
Match lines: 2
211| public function getTipo(): string
216| public function setTipo(string $tipo): self
File: src/Entity/DeiAssessmentAnswers.php
Match lines: 1
135| public function setArea(string $area): self
File: src/Entity/DeiAssessmentQuestion.php
Match lines: 1
87| public function setArea(string $area): self
File: src/Entity/EsocialAgentesNocivosEAtividades.php
Match lines: 2
64| public function getTipo(): ?string
69| public function setTipo(string $tipo): self
File: src/Entity/GovernanceAuthorization.php
Match lines: 5
345| public function setArea(?CompanyArea $area): self
357| public function setAprovadorMember(?CompanyMembers $aprovadorMember): self
369| public function setAprovadorRole(?Roles $aprovadorRole): self
382| public function getTipo(): ?string
387| public function setTipo(?string $tipo): self
File: src/Entity/GovernanceAuthorizationApprover.php
Match lines: 1
147| return $this->appliesToType($authorization->getTipo());
File: src/Entity/GovernanceCaseRecord.php
Match lines: 2
180| public function getTipo(): string
185| public function setTipo(string $tipo): self
File: src/Entity/GovernanceCaseRuntimeState.php
Match lines: 2
184| public function getTipo(): string
189| public function setTipo(string $tipo): self
File: src/Entity/ProfileSkill.php
Match lines: 2
42| public function getTipo(): ?string
47| public function setTipo(string $tipo): self
File: src/Entity/SpecialistPreviousExperience.php
Match lines: 1
138| public function setArea($area)
File: src/Entity/UserAchievement.php
Match lines: 2
110| public function getTipo(): string
115| public function setTipo(string $tipo): self
File: src/Entity/UserExpectativacontratacao.php
Match lines: 1
127| public function setArea($area): self
File: src/Entity/UserExperienciaprofissional.php
Match lines: 1
121| public function setArea(?string $area): self
File: src/Governance/CaseAutomation/Dto/CaseSnapshot.php
Match lines: 1
56| public function getTipo(): string
File: src/Repository/EsocialAgentesNocivosEAtividadesRepository.php
Match lines: 1
98| 'tipo' => $agente->getTipo(),
File: src/Repository/GovernanceAuthorizationRepository.php
Match lines: 1
236| 'tipo' => $aut->getTipo(),
File: src/Service/Contractor/ContractorDocumentRequirementService.php
Match lines: 1
245| ->setArea($area !== '' ? $area : null)
File: src/Service/Contractor/ContractorProviderCompanyService.php
Match lines: 3
185| ->setTipo($tipo)
437| 'company_tipo' => (string) $providerCompany->getTipo(),
797| $tipo = $providerCompany->getTipo();
File: src/Service/DeiAssessmentAnswersService.php
Match lines: 1
61| $answer->setArea($question->getArea());
File: src/Service/Effectiveness/Grc/GrcActionNormalizer.php
Match lines: 1
105| $tipo = (string) $entry['tipo'] ?? (string) $record->getTipo();
File: src/Service/Effectiveness/Grc/GrcActionReader.php
Match lines: 1
115| 'tipo' => (string) $record->getTipo(),
File: src/Service/Governance/CaseAutomation/GovernanceCaseAutomationActionRunner.php
Match lines: 3
101| $result = $this->runtimeStateService->applyEstado($company, $snapshot->getCaseKey(), $toStatus, 'AUTOMATION', $snapshot->getTipo());
204| 'tipo' => $snapshot->getTipo(),
213| $this->runtimeStateService->applyEstado($company, $snapshot->getCaseKey(), 'resolvido', 'AUTOMATION', $snapshot->getTipo());
File: src/Service/Governance/CaseAutomation/GovernanceCaseAutomationEvaluator.php
Match lines: 1
44| if (!$this->matchListCondition($conditions, 'typeIn', $snapshot->getTipo())) {
File: src/Service/Governance/CaseAutomation/GovernanceCaseRuntimeStateService.php
Match lines: 5
33| $state->setTipo($defaultTipo);
73| $state->setTipo($newTipo);
88| $transition = $this->applyEstado($company, $caseKey, 'liberado_excecao', $source, $state->getTipo());
145| $fallbackEstado = $state->getTipo() === 'nao_conformidade' ? 'bloqueado' : 'pendente_acao';
146| $transition = $this->applyEstado($company, $caseKey, $fallbackEstado, $source, $state->getTipo());
File: src/Service/Governance/CaseAutomation/GovernanceCaseSnapshotFactory.php
Match lines: 2
53| $tipo = $runtime?->getTipo() ?? (string) ($caseRow['tipo'] ?? 'risco');
103| 'tipo' => $record->getTipo(),
File: src/Service/Governance/Grc/GovernanceCaseGrcEnrichmentService.php
Match lines: 3
172| if ($runtimeState->getTipo() !== $monitoringTipo) {
173| $runtimeState->setTipo($monitoringTipo);
179| $tipo = (string) $runtimeState->getTipo();
File: src/Service/Governance/Grc/GrcCaseLifecycleService.php
Match lines: 1
541| if ($runtime instanceof \App\Entity\GovernanceCaseRuntimeState && $runtime->getTipo() === 'nao_conformidade') {
File: src/Service/InterpersonalDynamicsService.php
Match lines: 1
74| $answer->setArea($question->getArea());
File: src/Service/MetaHuman/GovernanceCasesHubService.php
Match lines: 15
727| : ($record->getTipo() === 'nao_conformidade'
739| 'tipo' => $record->getTipo(),
789| 'tipo' => $record->getTipo(),
927| $record->setTipo($tipo);
1151| $record->getTipo(),
1155| $runtimeState->setTipo($record->getTipo());
1411| $tipo = $runtimeState->getTipo();
1697| $runtimeState instanceof GovernanceCaseRuntimeState ? (string) $runtimeState->getTipo() : 'risco',
1775| $targetEstado = $runtimeState->getTipo() === 'nao_conformidade' ? 'bloqueado' : 'pendente_acao';
2328| if ($record->getTipo() !== 'risco') {
3396| $runtimeTipo = trim((string) $runtimeState->getTipo());
3828| 'tipo' => $record->getTipo(),
3875| $tipo = (string) ($record->getTipo() ?? 'risco');
5399| $tipo = (string) $runtimeState->getTipo();
5542| 'tipo' => $record->getTipo(),
File: src/Service/MetaHuman/GovernanceCasesResolvedExampleSeeder.php
Match lines: 1
87| $record->setTipo($example['tipo']);
File: src/Service/ProcessDashboardDataProvider.php
Match lines: 1
2142| 'type' => $ua->getTipo(),
Request #82
deepseek-v4-flash
P:89.59K C:580 CR:86.78K CW:0
6052ms
Reasoning
GovernanceAuthorization setters for the new fields exist (setArea, setAprovadorMember, setAprovadorRole, setTipo) but only used inside the Entity + repository. In authorizationSave no call to these setters with the payload. So saving the four new fields is missing in the controller. The modal posts fields that get ignored. So confirmed bug. Wait — is it possible the modal posts to SALVAR_URL 'governance_authorization_save' but there is a separate `governance_authorization_update` route? Create tab payload when editing sends id and posts to same SALVAR_URL. Both handled by authorizationSave, which handles both create and update. So yes fields ignored.
Hold on: maybe the template change belongs to a PR whose backend modification is on a *different* branch/PR (cc-auth-config-model merged). We saw repository::toArray includes fields; entity has fields, and GovernanceAuthorizationConfig stuff works. But authorizationSave not updated is part of the model branch? Actually model branch's purpose was only the config model + API, and columns in member_autorizacao. The settings UI PR presumably still needs controller updates for authorizationSave. Perhaps that will come in another later PR? But the branch description's test says: "Criar autorização: Área e Tipo obrigatórios ... e salvar. Editar uma autorização e conferir se área, tipo e aprovadores voltam preenchidos no modal." That's a claim of the current PR. And it says "Resultado esperado: ... O formulário de criação coleta área, tipo e aprovadores e envia no payload. A listagem/edição lê area_id, tipo, aprovador_id e aprovador_role_id quando gravados." The listagem/edição reads fields when saved—but nothing saves them. So this PR is incomplete: backend save + hub serialization must be updated. Good — report it.
However, is GovernanceController used for authorizationSave called from create tab? Yes, SALVAR_URL governance_authorization_save. It lacks permission nuance? fine.
Wait — perhaps there's another layer: `governanceAuthorizationSave` is also in a service that has defaults: if aprovador_id null, use default approvers from config? Search for "applyDefaultApprovers" or "resolveDefaultApprover" in the codebase.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/"], "search_text": "resolveDefaultApprover|defaultApprover|approver_members|applyToType"}
Result
No matches found
Request #83
deepseek-v4-flash
P:90.19K C:92 CR:90.11K CW:0
1928ms
Reasoning
Search for applier default approvers; perhaps in model branch. Let's search GovernanceAuthorizationApprover usage.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/"], "search_text": "GovernanceAuthorizationApprover"}
Result
File: src/Entity/GovernanceAuthorizationApprover.php
Match lines: 1
17|class GovernanceAuthorizationApprover
File: src/Entity/GovernanceAuthorizationConfig.php
Match lines: 9
58| * @var Collection<int, GovernanceAuthorizationApprover>
60| * @ORM\OneToMany(targetEntity=GovernanceAuthorizationApprover::class, mappedBy="config", cascade={"persist", "remove"}, orphanRemoval=true)
194| * @return Collection<int, GovernanceAuthorizationApprover>
201| /** @return list<GovernanceAuthorizationApprover> */
206| static fn (GovernanceAuthorizationApprover $approver): bool => $approver->getMember() instanceof CompanyMembers
210| /** @return list<GovernanceAuthorizationApprover> */
215| static fn (GovernanceAuthorizationApprover $approver): bool => $approver->getRole() instanceof Roles
219| public function addApprover(GovernanceAuthorizationApprover $approver): self
229| public function removeApprover(GovernanceAuthorizationApprover $approver): self
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigService.php
Match lines: 4
9|use App\Entity\GovernanceAuthorizationApprover;
241| ): GovernanceAuthorizationApprover {
242| $approver = new GovernanceAuthorizationApprover();
278| * @param list<GovernanceAuthorizationApprover> $approvers
Request #84
deepseek-v4-flash
P:90.6K C:789 CR:90.24K CW:0
7904ms
Reasoning
There's no application code that uses the config default approvers when creating an authorization and no approver informed — at least not yet found. Given entity GovernanceAuthorizationApprover has appliesToType(..) but not referenced elsewhere (only in entity itself). So even the "default approvers fallback" rule in the UI (the hint text) might have no backend implementation. But backend for demand approval logic may be in another module branch. We won't dig further.
Summary of the findings for code_comment:
A. (high/bug) settings: whole feature tab loads/persists via inline JS/CSS giant; mandatory god-template rule; also duplicate CSS across two files and JS not in public/js. Anchor at `<script>` region.
B. (medium/security) CSRF missing on config autosave POST - new endpoint toggles company-wide default approvers & authorization types. Also flag that even if controller currently doesn't enforce CSRF, adding token is recommended; check `show`/`save` controller. Anchor persist ajax lines.
C. (high/bug) create-tab payload posts area_id/tipo/aprovador... but backend authorizationSave ignores them and hubs (aut_all) don't serialize them for edit prefill; additionally the SsmaController render path doesn't pass catalog vars (aut_company_areas, aut_authorization_types), so in the SSMA "Autorizações" hub, area/tipo selects are empty and creation becomes impossible (mandatory). Anchor payload lines 2065-2068.
D. (medium) edit modal aut_all lacks new fields → need backend; this overlaps C; fold into C.
E. (low) `ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers` empty stub. Anchor.
F. (low/medium) autosave debounce without unload flush; data can be lost silently; recommend flushing on pagehide and error feedback. Anchor at scheduleSave function lines 601-607? Actually the scheduleSave function body lines 601-607.
Hmm, is it worth posting F given the seq guard? Yes low.
G. (low) Reuse components/CSS duplication. Include within A.
Let me double check actual line numbers for code anchor `function scheduleSave() {` etc. lines 601-607 confirmed above.
Now for the create tab anchor for payload, lines 2065-2068 confirmed earlier. For empty function anchor 2419-2421 confirmed earlier by code_search result (file line 2419).
The god-template comment for settings anchored at:
```
<script>
(function () {
var SAVE_URL = {{ path('governance_authorization_config_save')|json_encode|raw }};
```
That's lines 293-295. Wait line 295 is `var SAVE_URL ...`? Actually we saw earlier at line numbers 293-295? Let me verify from earlier read: at the beginning, lines 293? Actually the initial file read shows line 291: `<script>`; then 292 `(function () {`; 293 `var SAVE_URL = ...;`? Not exactly; I read beginning at line 293 earlier? Let's confirm the file lines around script start (lines 288-305). We didn't get line numbers for that. Let me fetch quick lines 290-320.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 330, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig", "start_line": 286}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig (Total lines: 1224)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 286-330
286|
287| <div class="gov-auth-approver-list" id="govAuthApproverList"></div>
288| </section>
289|</div>
290|
291|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_add_approver.html.twig' %}
292|
293|<script>
294|(function () {
295| var SAVE_URL = {{ path('governance_authorization_config_save')|json_encode|raw }};
296| var ALL_AREAS_VALUE = '__all__';
297| var ALL_AREAS_LABEL = 'Todas as Áreas';
298| var initialTypes = {{ aut_authorization_types|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
299| var initialApproverMembers = {{ aut_authorization_approver_members|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
300| var initialApproverRoles = {{ aut_authorization_approver_roles|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
301|
302| var typeInput = document.getElementById('govAuthTypeInput');
303| var typeChips = document.getElementById('govAuthTypeChips');
304| var approverList = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverList');
305| var membersOption = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverMembersOption');
306| var rolesOption = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverRolesOption');
307| var useMembers = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverUseMembers');
308| var useRoles = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverUseRoles');
309| var membersWrap = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverMembersWrap');
310| var rolesWrap = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverRolesWrap');
311| var membersBtn = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverMembersBtn');
312| var rolesBtn = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverRolesBtn');
313| var pickerBody = document.getElementById('govAuthPickerBody');
314| var pickerSearch = document.getElementById('govAuthPickerSearch');
315| var pickerFilters = document.getElementById('govAuthPickerFilters');
316| var pickerFilterCargo = document.getElementById('govAuthPickerFilterCargo');
317| var pickerFilterTeam = document.getElementById('govAuthPickerFilterTeam');
318| var pickerFilterBond = document.getElementById('govAuthPickerFilterBond');
319| var pickerCheckAll = document.getElementById('govAuthPickerCheckAll');
320| var pickerSubmit = document.getElementById('govAuthPickerSubmit');
321| var catalogMembers = {{ allMembers|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
322| var catalogRoles = {{ aut_company_roles|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
323| var pickerKind = 'member';
324| var skipSave = true;
325| var saveTimer = null;
326| var saveSeq = 0;
327| var AVATAR_COLORS = ['#E85D4C', '#2F4A6E', '#3D9B6E', '#3B82F6', '#8B5CF6', '#F59E0B'];
328| var BOND_LABELS = { clt: 'CLT', terceiro: 'Terceiro' };
329|
330| function normalizeLabel(value) {
Request #85
deepseek-v4-flash
P:92.17K C:5.25K CR:91.39K CW:0
38711ms
Reasoning
Good anchor lines.
Now let me review what the tab looks like in settings around opening lines 293-330 for CSS duplication statement— fine.
Now, let's determine the anchor for the second file _modal_add_approver for the god-template/CSS comment. The file has `<style>` and ~300 lines of CSS. Anchor:
```
<style>
#govAuthAddApproverModal.modal {
z-index: 1200 !important;
}
```
Now compose the comments. Since the code_comment tool takes multiple comments, we can batch all.
Comment A (settings, maintainability/high):
Content in pt-BR with structure:
- (1) O que mudou: a aba Configurações coloca ~900 linhas de JS e ~300 de CSS dentro do Twig (arquivo de 1.223 linhas) e ainda inclui outro partial de 361 linhas com mais CSS; a aba de criação que já é gigante também ganhou JS novo.
- (2) Por que importa: manter a regra "lógica de tela em public/js, CSS em assets" e não ampliar god template; dificulta manutenção/teste, e o CSS de chip está duplicado nos dois arquivos novos.
- (3) O que fazer: mover script e estilo para assets próprios (ex.: js/governance/... e css/governance/...), deixando o Twig só marcação; ao menos unificar CSS.
Comment B (settings, security/medium): CSRF ausente no POST de config. Endpoint altera aprovadores padrão e tipos da empresa inteira. Mesmo que o controller não valide hoje, mutação deve carregar csrf_token (header ou body) conforme padrão do projeto; conferir validação no backend e adicionar.
Comment C (create tab payload, bug/high):
- O que mudou: o modal passa a enviar area_id, tipo, aprovador_id e aprovador_role_id no POST de criação/edição, e tenta reaplicá-los na edição.
- Impacto: na árvore atual (fora deste diff), o controller authorizationSave não lê esses campos (não chama setArea/setAprovadorMember/setAprovadorRole/setTipo) e os hubs que alimentam aut_all também não serializam; então os dados são descartados e a edição volta em branco com área e tipo obrigatórios — o objetivo central da PR não funciona.
- Também na rota SSMA do hub (SsmaController::autorizacaoIndex) que renderiza a mesma index, as variáveis de catálogo (aut_company_areas, aut_authorization_types, etc.) não são injetadas; selects de área/tipo nascem vazios e, com a nova obrigatoriedade, não dá para criar autorização por ali.
- O que fazer: incluir nessa PR (ou PR acoplada) o ajuste no backend de save/detalhe e no hub; caso contrário, reverter a UI até o contrato existir.
Wait, is SSMA route the same template? Yes autorizacaoIndex renders governance/authorization/index.html.twig (line 739). Does it pass ssmaCanCreateAuthorization etc.? buildSsmaViewData includes permissions. So yes if a user can create authorization via SSMA hub, this new mandatory area/tipo breaks. Actually area/tipo selects empty for both governance? No governance hub passes aut_company_areas and aut_authorization_types. But SSMA hub does not. However, does the SsmaController's index also display config tab and modal with the same create tab? Yes, same template. So in the SSMA hub, modal create: area select empty -> mark invalid upon save -> cannot create. That's a real regression for SSMA Autorizações users. Unless ssmaCanCreateAuthorization false there... but ssma hub is the primary place for authorizations historically? Possibly; anyway the bug stands if both routes are active.
Actually which route is the "central de governança"? GovernanceController buildAuthorizationHubContext likely routes '/manager/governance/authorizations' while SsmaController at '/manager/ssma/authorizations' (or similar legacy). Either way SSMA autorizacaoIndex will be affected. Good.
Comment D: edit prefill fields (aut_all). Merge into C to avoid duplication? C already mentions hub serialization. Might keep one comment C with both aspects. Yes merge.
Comment E (create tab, maintainability/low): stub empty ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers. Content: função vazia chamada logo após salvar config; sugere sincronizar aprovadores padrão que nunca acontece. Remover ou implementar.
Comment F (settings, other/low): autosave com debounce de 400 ms: mudanças feitas e navegação imediata se perdem; sem flush em beforeunload/pagehide; sugerir flush no unload e considerar feedback de falha.
Let me be selective: too many comments may dilute. We'll produce 6 comments max: A (god template settings), B (CSRF), C (create payload/backend missing) — the highest-value ones — plus E stub empty function, F autosave loss, and a small index comment? The modal CSS duplication is part of A.
Actually also D: index.html.twig no comment needed.
Wait maybe also a comment about the settings tab being shown based on ssmaCanManageConfig but the tab content references the config save endpoint: if user has canManage but tab hidden... skip.
One more potential comment: The settings tab also executes autosave and includes the approver picker modal; the modal open button etc fine.
Now let me ensure code anchors match exactly:
A anchor:
```
<script>
(function () {
var SAVE_URL = {{ path('governance_authorization_config_save')|json_encode|raw }};
```
Will this line match diff? The diff file is new lines, containing exactly this sequence? Lines 293-295, yes consecutive:
`<script>`
`(function () {`
` var SAVE_URL = {{ path('governance_authorization_config_save')|json_encode|raw }};`
B anchor (persist ajax):
```
window.jQuery.ajax({
url: SAVE_URL,
method: 'POST',
contentType: 'application/json; charset=UTF-8',
data: JSON.stringify(payload)
```
consecutive lines 573-577.
C anchor (create payload):
```
area_id: areaId,
aprovador_id: aprovadorId || null,
aprovador_role_id: aprovadorRoleId || null,
tipo: tipo
```
Yes lines 2065-2068 consecutive new lines.
E anchor (empty function):
```
window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers = function () {
};
```
Consecutive lines 2419-2421 (line 2420 `};`). Yes.
F anchor (scheduleSave): lines 601-607:
```
function scheduleSave() {
if (skipSave) {
return;
}
clearTimeout(saveTimer);
saveTimer = setTimeout(persist, 400);
}
```
Modal file comment G anchor CSS beginning; combine with A? Since A anchored in settings; and modal is separate file included by settings, but rules say every file gets its own pass. Since the modal file's CSS duplication is distinct but part of god template concern, let's include a separate small comment G (low maintainability):
```
<style>
#govAuthAddApproverModal.modal {
z-index: 1200 !important;
}
```
Let me consider a couple more potential actual bugs discovered in the code to be thorough:
1) In settings file line: `catalogMembers` maps member.position (maybe not unique values); fillFilterSelect uses uniqueSorted so fine.
2) A11y: `.gov-auth-settings-option` role=button containing checkbox + label: clicking the label triggers the checkbox, but their click handler returns early when the target is checkbox or label; fine.
3) `createChip` uses `chip.setAttribute('data-type', key || labelKey(label))`. For approver person chips, data-type = kind:id; `hasChip` uses labelKey on 'member:5'. Fine.
4) On `renderPickerRows` with filters active: They rebuild the picker rows each open and reset filters. Fine.
5) `typeInput keydown` - Enter triggers add; if repeated fast each Enter creates chips; fine.
6) Bug: When adding an approver with limited areas in picker, then submit: `collectAreaKeys(row)` in modal returns chips in the modal area wrap with data-area-key; they pass areaKeys. Fine.
7) Bug: In `submitPicker`, after adding rows, they don't ensure that removed duplicate members from modal are still limited by area; no issue.
8) Potential bug: In modal, when picking a limited area select value from dropdown of types and multiple chips accumulate, the select's options exclude selected. After the first selection, rebuildPickerAreaSelect re-fills; value reset ''; the `.is-limited` stays. Good.
9) The `.gov-auth-picker-area` markup in modal: pill shows when all areas, select when limited. In renderPickerRows, rows start data-all-areas 1, pill "Todas as Áreas". In picker row HTML no chip for ALL areas; setPickerRowAreas with allAreas=true and no chips; pill remains. Fine.
10) When user clicks checkbox then the pill toggles etc; fine.
11) `visiblePickerRows` counts `tr[data-id]` not hidden. When empty search, filter-empty-row has no data-id; ok.
No further bugs.
Also, the config auto save writes each change even when only expanding area (keeps data consistent).
Now — CSRF nuance. Since several pre-existing flows in the same module also skip CSRF (conditions save, create modal), a purely security comment could be interpreted as out of standard. But the review rules mandate mention, and default approvers config is company-wide; the impact of a forged POST is high. I'll write it balanced: "O endpoint é novo nesta entrega; os demais endpoints do módulo também não enviam token — vale padronizar, mas principalmente este endpoint mexe em aprovação padrão/ tipos da empresa. Adicionar csrf_token e validar no controller (fora do diff)".
Let's also double check the `show` method GET returns `authorization_types`, etc. And in settings JS, after save it uses res.approver_members etc. Good.
Now write comments in Portuguese with proper structure.
Let me double check file line numbers used for anchor in the modal file for CSS duplication, so snippet matches text:
```
<style>
#govAuthAddApproverModal.modal {
z-index: 1200 !important;
}
```
At lines 61-64. It's part of the diff text.
Also need to be careful about the code_comment existing_code must match lines present in diff exactly with identical whitespace indentation.
For settings anchors, indentation: ` var SAVE_URL = ...` four spaces. Yes.
Let's also confirm the create tab anchor lines content: at lines 2064-2068:
```
responsavel_id: responsavelId,
area_id: areaId,
aprovador_id: aprovadorId || null,
aprovador_role_id: aprovadorRoleId || null,
tipo: tipo
```
Yes.
Empty function lines 2419-2420 content:
```
window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers = function () {
};
```
Yes (2421 `};` line 2420, and there might be blank line 2421). Use two lines.
Wait, the diff shows these lines:
```
+ window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers = function () {
+ };
```
Let me anchor these two lines. In the file, the last line 2420 `};` and line 2421 `})();` then line 2422 `</script>`? Actually earlier file has 2423 total; `})();` then `</script>`. The anchor will be two lines.
Now build the comments. Severity labels: A: high; B: medium; C: high; E: low; F: medium? maybe low. G low.
Also the branch-specific user instructions say the "God template" is highest weight. A good single comment summarizing.
I might also want to include in comment C a mention to confirm both rendering routes. Already.
Let me finalize 6 comments:
1. _tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig, maintainability, high — god template.
2. _tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig, security, medium — CSRF.
3. _tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig, other, low/medium — autosave lost on navigation (debounce, no flush) and silent fail feedback incomplete? Actually failure does show toast only if response is error; but leaving page loses. low/medium; choose medium? The scenario: user makes change, immediately clicks another tab/route — 400 ms debounce, might lose last change with no warning. Medium impact for data loss? It's config, easily re-done, not catastrophic. severity medium but could be low. The prior task summary listed medium for "silently lost if fails or navigating before timer". I'll keep low, but mention in same comment to show saving state. Keep "low".
Actually it's data persistence of config — if they add types and click away quickly, config silently lost. Medium seems okay-ish. I'll use medium. Hmm keep low-mid; choose low? Let me choose medium to avoid underweighting but not as high as the god template. We'll set severity medium and category other.
4. _tab_authorizations_create.html.twig, bug, high — payload fields not persisted by backend & catalog/hub missing for edit + SSMA context lacking catalog vars.
5. _tab_authorizations_create.html.twig, maintainability, low — empty ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers stub.
6. _modal_add_approver.html.twig, maintainability, low — CSS duplication with settings (chips/avatar/area styles) and large inline styles; unify.
Also add possibly an index comment to make sure every file got pass: review of index.html.twig found nothing wrong; but I should still "give its own pass" per rules. That doesn't require comment if no issues. And for _modal_authorization_form.html.twig — no comment needed either; but we should double-check any bug introduced there worth noting. Possibly the mandatory fields: In the new form, the "Área" and "Tipo" selects are included even in read-only view? Fine.
Actually wait: _modal_authorization_form.html.twig also defines the title input row etc. One important potential bug: The hint uses 'se nenhum for informado, a demanda usa os aprovadores padrão das Configurações' but there's no such resolution implemented in the save path we inspected (authorizationSave doesn't apply default approvers). Given backend separate, likely not needed. Skip.
One more: `autCriarDescricao` mandatory but previously the field help states *required; it is still required. Order change. Fine.
I think there's one more possibly important issue: In `_modal_authorization_form.html.twig` the new fields moved contractor requirements to `d-none` (hidden) always. If previously those were required or useful, hiding might degrade function. But maybe they were unused. Skip, can't be sure.
Let me now also confirm the empty stub exists right before closing `})();` — the stub might have been intended to be implemented but we confirm no other implementation elsewhere (code_search only showed definition + call). Good.
One more consideration about anchor text style matching diff: The code_comment tool expects "existing_code" lines consistent with diff; providing 3-5 lines exact.
Let me now write them.
For comment A, mention line counts to emphasize god-template: `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` = 1224 linhas (900+ JS + CSS inline) + `_modal_add_approver` 361 linhas (300 CSS inline); create tab already has 2400+ linhas and this PR adds more logic (selects, refresh, validations). Also duplicate CSS across the two new files.
For comment C, reference files outside diff by relative path (src/Controller/GovernanceController.php authorizationSave lines 1337-1476 and loadAuthorizationsData 3310-3327; src/Controller/SsmaController.php autorizacaoIndex 708-743). These outside the diff are only references for explanation; the comment is attached to the in-diff line.
Alright, compose the final code_comment batch.
Tool Calls (1)
code_comment
Show Details
Arguments
{"comments": [{"path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig", "comments": "", "category": "maintainability", "severity": "high", "content": "A aba nova concentra quase 1.200 linhas dentro do Twig (mais de 900 de JavaScript e ~300 de CSS inline) e ainda inclui um partial de 361 linhas com mais CSS embutido; a aba de criação, que já passa de 2.400 linhas, também ganhou mais lógica nesta PR. Isso amplia o padrão de \"god template\" que a revisão pede para sinalizar em primeiro lugar: lógica de picker, filtros, autosave e manipulação de DOM deveria ficar em public/js (e o estilo em assets), não em bloco <script>/<style> de centenas de linhas. Além de dificultar manutenção e teste isolado, o CSS de chip/avatar/área acaba duplicado entre este arquivo e o _modal_add_approver.html.twig. Sugestão: mover o script e o estilo para arquivos dedicados (ex.: public/js/governance/... e public/css/governance/...), deixando o Twig apenas com a marcação — e, no mínimo, unificar o CSS duplicado.", "existing_code": "<script>\n(function () {\n var SAVE_URL = {{ path('governance_authorization_config_save')|json_encode|raw }};"}, {"path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig", "category": "security", "severity": "medium", "content": "Este POST de autosave altera os tipos de autorização e os aprovadores padrão da empresa inteira, mas não envia nenhum token CSRF (nem header nem corpo). Se o endpoint validar CSRF, o salvamento falha e a aba fica inutilizável; se não validar, a rota fica aberta a POST forjado que troca quem aprova autorizações. É preciso incluir o token (ex.: csrf_token('governance_authorization_config_save') no corpo ou header) e confirmar que o GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController::save valida — vale também padronizar com os demais saves do módulo, que hoje estão no mesmo padrão sem token.", "existing_code": " window.jQuery.ajax({\n url: SAVE_URL,\n method: 'POST',\n contentType: 'application/json; charset=UTF-8',\n data: JSON.stringify(payload)"}, {"path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig", "category": "other", "severity": "medium", "content": "O salvamento é automático com debounce de 400 ms e nada dispara o flush quando o usuário sai da página ou troca de rota. Se a pessoa adicionar/remover tipos ou aprovadores e navegar logo em seguida, a última alteração é perdida silenciosamente; um POST com falha também não deixa estado pendente nem aviso claro. Sugiro disparar persist() em pagehide/beforeunload (ou ao menos registrar um aviso de \"salvando\") e, se o backend não tiver controle de concorrência, considerar versão/updated_at porque dois gestores editando em paralelo fazem o último POST sobrescrever o trabalho do outro.", "existing_code": " function scheduleSave() {\n if (skipSave) {\n return;\n }\n clearTimeout(saveTimer);\n saveTimer = setTimeout(persist, 400);\n }"}, {"path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig", "category": "bug", "severity": "high", "content": "O modal agora envia area_id, tipo, aprovador_id e aprovador_role_id no save e tenta reaplicá-los na edição, mas o contrato com o backend ainda não existe nesta árvore: o endpoint que recebe esse POST (GovernanceController::authorizationSave, fora deste diff) não lê esses campos — não chama setArea/setAprovadorMember/setAprovadorRole/setTipo — então os dados são silenciosamente descartados. Além disso, os hubs que alimentam a lista usada na edição (aut_all em GovernanceController::loadAuthorizationsData e SsmaController::loadAutorizacoesData) não serializam area_id/tipo/aprovador_id/aprovador_role_id, então ao editar uma autorização já salva os campos voltam em branco e, como área e tipo ficaram obrigatórios, o usuário é forçado a redigitar. Na rota do hub SSMA (SsmaController::autorizacaoIndex renderiza a mesma index sem injetar aut_company_areas/aut_authorization_types/aut_company_roles), os selects de área/tipo nascem vazios e a criação fica impossível. É preciso incluir nesta PR (ou em PR acoplada) a gravação no save e a serialização no hub; caso contrário, reverter a UI até o contrato existir.", "existing_code": " area_id: areaId,\n aprovador_id: aprovadorId || null,\n aprovador_role_id: aprovadorRoleId || null,\n tipo: tipo"}, {"path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig", "category": "maintainability", "severity": "low", "content": "A função ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers é declarada vazia e é chamada logo após salvar as Configurações, dando a entender que o modal de criação seria sincronizado com os aprovadores padrão — o que nunca acontece. Se essa sincronização não é desejada nesta tela, remova a função e a chamada; se é desejada, falta implementá-la.", "existing_code": " window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers = function () {\n };"}, {"path": "templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_add_approver.html.twig", "category": "maintainability", "severity": "low", "content": "O partial novo carrega ~300 linhas de CSS inline e duplica regras que já existem na aba Configurações (mesmas definições de .gov-auth-settings-chip, chip__remove e cores de área em _tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig). Vale unificar esse estilo em um arquivo de assets do módulo (public/css/governance/...) e avaliar se o seletor de pessoa/área não deveria ser um componente compartilhado, já que tende a se repetir em outros fluxos de governança.", "existing_code": "<style>\n#govAuthAddApproverModal.modal {\n z-index: 1200 !important;\n}"}]}
Result
(async)
Request #86
deepseek-v4-flash
P:97.43K C:1.34K CR:97.41K CW:0
11105ms
Reasoning
The code_comment call succeeded. Let me verify I covered every file in review_files:
1. index.html.twig — reviewed; no blocking issue found (tab additions are fine; the visualizar change is inside a section only rendered under canCreate...). Actually wait: should I comment on the visualizar issue? The plan earlier listed medium #3, but after investigation the create tab is only rendered under canCreate, so exposing "Visualizar" is not meaningful; no security impact. OK no comment.
But there's another subtlety for index.html.twig: Settings tab includes `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` which includes modal; also modal hoisting list in JS on line ~138 includes govAuthAddApproverModal. Fine.
2. _tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig — comments provided (god template, CSRF, autosave).
3. _modal_add_approver.html.twig — comment (CSS duplication).
4. _modal_authorization_form.html.twig — reviewed; no comment.
5. _tab_authorizations_create.html.twig — comments (payload/backend, empty stub).
I should also double check whether there are other issues in _modal_authorization_form worth commenting. Let me quickly reconsider mandatory field `tipo` select's first option label 'Selecionar o tipo' when required: placeholder is text so user must select; fine. The hidden select includes option value ''.
One concern: In the custom-select, when `selected_value` empty and label provided ('Selecionar a área'), the trigger label is the placeholder. Marking the select invalid triggers the :has() CSS now. Good.
Another potential real issue: the `autCriarArea` select list is driven by `aut_company_areas`, which comes from CompanyAreaRepository->findForCompany($company, true) - areas of company. Requirement stated "Área de Aplicação" in modal picker vs "Área Responsável"? In the create modal, label is "Área Responsável". Fine.
The dropdown for cargo aprovador options uses `aut_company_roles` but earlier in the code of _modal_add_approver they use `catalogRoles` from aut_company_roles too. Fine.
Another issue candidate: The fields area/aprovador/aprovador_role selects include all possible options; when company has none, empty. In governance hub, company areas filtered by findForCompany($company, true): the true parameter likely filters 'active' or only enabled. Fine.
Let me quickly revisit whether the previously flagged "payload duplicated responsibility" — the payload includes `responsavel_id` (still) and new `area_id`, plus `tipo`. Since the backend authorizationSave doesn't validate area/tipo presence, creating authorization with required UI fields but dropping them server-side remains consistent with the earlier bug comment C.
One more: The empty-fn E was included.
I think we are done. But wait: our earlier review notes mention the user rule - "Feedback de sucesso/erro usa showToast; alert() proibido". In the new code, there are `alert`? Search for window.alert in the new files (modal uses notifyError with showToast; fine). The create tab existing code has alert fallback elsewhere but that's pre-existing; new code uses showToast. Fine.
Now consider whether to include a comment for `index.html.twig` about the `defaultAutTab` fallback still = 'tab_auth_criar' when tabs nonempty with config-only managers: not our problem.
Let me also double check settings tab with the `ssmaCanManageConfig` - config endpoint returns 403 if not; but tab visible only to those with permission. Because config save controller's permission is broader (role-based), but tab shown under `ssmaCanManageConfig` (probably determined by role/attributes). Might allow manager with permission to access via API but not UI; not a security issue.
One thing: `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` includes its own `<style>` and the settings page also has the shared head CSS assets, but nothing prevents conflict; fine.
Since there are no more issues found, and we've given each file its own pass, call task_done.
Actually, wait — maybe we should double check that the hidden "visualizar" table change doesn't actually affect SSMA card list etc. Not needed.
Given comments done, mark task done.
A revisão foi concluída. Comentários adicionados:
**`_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig`** — arquivo novo de 1.224 linhas com ~900 linhas de JS e ~300 de CSS inline (god template, maior prioridade da regra); POST de autosave sem token CSRF para rota que altera aprovadores padrão/tipos da empresa; autosave com debounce de 400 ms sem flush ao navegar (perda silenciosa e concorrência entre gestores).
**`_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig`** — payload novo (`area_id`, `tipo`, `aprovador_id`, `aprovador_role_id`) não é consumido por `GovernanceController::authorizationSave` (fora do diff), e os hubs não serializam esses campos no `aut_all` usado pela edição; na rota SSMA as variáveis de catálogo nem são injetadas — quebra de contrato que impede o objetivo central da PR; função `ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers` declarada vazia e chamada sem efeito.
**`_modal_add_approver.html.twig`** — ~300 linhas de CSS inline duplicando regras de chips já presentes na aba Configurações; sugestão de unificar em asset do módulo.
`index.html.twig` e `_modal_authorization_form.html.twig` passaram por revisão sem achados bloqueantes (a mudança do botão "Visualizar" não expõe dados a quem não pode criar, pois a aba de criação só é renderizada com `ssmaCanCreateAuthorization`).
Tool Calls (1)
task_done
Show Details
Arguments
{"state": "DONE"}
Request #87
deepseek-v4-flash
P:29.85K C:11.18K CR:23.04K CW:0
88517ms
Reasoning
Let me review the files in the review group. I have previously confirmed findings that I should not repeat. Let me examine the code for other real issues.
Let me look at each file carefully.
Files:
1. `templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig` - small diff adding tab and modal id in cleanup loop.
2. `templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_add_approver.html.twig` - new file with modal + CSS.
3. `templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig` - modal form changes.
4. `templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig` - create tab logic.
5. `templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` - new settings tab.
Let me carefully look for new issues beyond the confirmed findings.
Let me look at index.html.twig diff. It adds tab to `autorizacaoTabs`, a new content div `tab_auth_configuracoes_content` with include `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig`, and adds `'govAuthAddApproverModal'` to the modal cleanup list at the bottom (which moves modals to body on DOM ready? Let me look at context).
Let me read context in index.html.twig to verify the JS array at line ~131 handles modal cleanup. Actually the diff shows the `.forEach` loop removing duplicates maybe - "if (el && el.parentNode !== document.body) { ... }". Let me read the file for more context.
Let me check whether the tab for config content references `ssmaCanManageConfig`. Note the config content div is inside the `{% if ssmaCanManageConfig %}` block. And include for `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig`.
One issue: the new settings tab and the modal are included only when `ssmaCanManageConfig`. The settings JS uses `window.ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes` which lives in `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig` tab. Is that tab always included on the page? The create tab is presumably always shown, but if the create tab content isn't rendered when not... Actually settings and create tab appear under different permission conditions. The modal save in settings calls `window.ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes(res.authorization_types ...)`. If create tab's script isn't loaded, that guard `typeof ... === 'function'` handles it. Fine.
Let me look at potential issue: In `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig`, `persist()` uses `window.jQuery.ajax` with `contentType: 'application/json'` POST. Confirmed finding #5 (CSRF) and #6 (debounce lost changes). Not repeat.
Other issues to look for:
A) `syncApproverMode` in settings: When both unchecked, useMembers set checked = true and membersOn = true. Good. Then scheduleSave. Good.
B) Initial hydration with `addApproverRow(..., silent=false)` triggers scheduleSave via `if (!silent) scheduleSave()`, but skipSave is true during hydration... Actually `skipSave = true` initially. hydrateAssignments calls addApproverRow with default silent = false -> scheduleSave() -> skipSave true so no-op. But setRowAreas in addApproverRow doesn't scheduleSave. OK.
Wait, `hydrateAssignments` passes default `silent` undefined so `!silent` is true => scheduleSave called. But skipSave is true at that time, so no-op. Then syncApproverMode schedules save — skipSave still true. Then skipSave=false. Good.
C) The settings `persist` fallback: `window.ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes(res.authorization_types || payload.authorization_types);`. If `res.authorization_types` empty array, then fallback uses payload. Hmm if server returns empty list but payload had types... Actually `res.authorization_types` may be `[]` which is truthy; `[] || payload` yields `[]` since empty array truthy. OK.
D) XSS: In settings, chips are created with textContent for labels — safe. In `_modal_add_approver`, `_modal_authorization_form` - uses `{{ csrf_token }}`? Actually not applicable to these.
E) In `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig` the custom option building: they append options with `textContent`. Let's check the code in new ensureAutCriarSelectOption: uses `$('<option>', { value: str, text: label })` — jQuery will escape. Fine.
F) `applyAutCriarModalFields`: `aut.area_name || (aut.area && aut.area.name)` could be object aut without area_name. ensureAutCriarSelectOption called with text possibly ''. Label fallback `str`. Fine.
G) Potential bug: In `applyAutCriarModalFields`, `var tipo = aut.tipo || aut.tipo_autorizacao || ''`. For roles etc.
H) In creation tab `resetAutCriarModal` resets AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS, which include autCriarTipo? Wait AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS = ['autCriarArea', 'autCriarResponsavel', 'autCriarAprovador', 'autCriarAprovadorRole', 'autCriarTipo']; That's in create file. Wait but this list includes autCriarResponsavel but does it include autCriarContractorReqAdd/autCriarRequisitoAdd? No, those handled separately.
I) The settings uses `aut_company_roles` to render `catalogRoles`. It's `var catalogRoles = {{ aut_company_roles|default([])|json_encode|raw }};`. If the roles contain fields (id, name), fine.
But the picker modal `_modal_add_approver.html.twig` includes static selects for filters and table. In `openApproverPicker` for role, filters are hidden; fine.
J) `_modal_add_approver` z-index issue: The modal is embedded within settings tab inside index; index likely also moves modals to body via `.forEach` in index bottom; they added govAuthAddApproverModal to that list. Good. But note the cleanup list only appends to body when parentNode != body. This is inside $(document).ready? Let me read index for context lines 120-150.
Let me read the index file lines around the modals list.
Actually let me check whether the list appends modals to body and duplicates when modal element already inside something. Fine.
K) In `_modal_authorization_form.html.twig`, they've changed label ordering but may have duplicated ids? They use `autCriarAprovadorRole` etc. distinct.
L) A potential real bug: In the create tab, the options building uses `aut_modal_area_options` etc. but the select is built from `aut_modal_area_options` - those areas presumably provided by hub. But ensure options on edit: area names from aut; options text names might mismatch by id only.
Potential correctness issue: When a user saves settings that remove a type used by an existing authorization's `tipo` field, the modal select for `autCriarTipo` rebuilt by `ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes` with only new types; if editing old authorization with removed tipo, ensureAutCriarSelectOption will re-add it dynamically before setting. Fine.
M) There might be mismatch: In create tab save, validation requires descricao and now area and tipo required and responsavel required. Previously responsavel required. OK.
N) The select `autCriarResponsavel` options built from allMembers; but there could be members that are inactive etc. Not needed.
O) In settings, a bug with `syncAllApproverAreaSelects` when removing types: `setRowAreas(row, kept.length === 0, kept)`. Fine.
P) The confirmations list already notes CSRF, debounce/flush, empty ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers, backend contract missing, god template/CSS duplication.
Let me look for new issues:
Potential bug in `_modal_add_approver` blur handling: `pickerBody.addEventListener('blur', ..., true)`; On remove chip event, they remove chip then `setPickerRowAreas(row, false, collectAreaKeys(row), true);`. Wait: setPickerRowAreas(row, allAreas=false...) keeps editing open. OK.
Wait, there's a subtle issue with removing area chips in the picker when the row is not limited (all areas): `collectAreaKeys(row)` would be empty for all-areas row. But the remove button only exists on area chips which only exist when limited. So allAreas false passed with kept keys.
Hmm let's check function signature: `setPickerRowAreas(row, allAreas, areaKeys, keepSelectOpen)`. When removing the last chip from a limited row, kept = [] -> then code path: `if (allAreas || areaKeys.length === 0) { allAreas = true; areaKeys = []; }`. So returns to all areas and removes is-editing unless keepSelectOpen. Since keepSelectOpen true, wrap becomes is-editing but is-limited false and allAreas; selects... fine.
Potential bug in picker: after checking a row, if you uncheck via the checkbox, we have the row click handler that toggles input when clicking anywhere else; but clicking checkbox itself triggers change and stops? Actually row click listener excludes input checkbox click. The change listener syncs check all. OK.
Bug: When checkbox for all selects all visible rows; but the hidden rows (filtered) remain unchecked — correct.
Now a possible real issue: filter `fillPickerFilters` uses `member.team_names` from `allMembers` data, but render rows uses data-teams attribute; team filter for a row uses data-teams. OK.
Another: In the settings' `renderPickerRows`, when a member is already added (hasApproverRow returns true) they exclude from picker. When removing a member from settings list while picker is open? Not possible, picker opens then rows computed. OK.
Possible issue: XSS through member data? They set with textContent, safe. But note `row.setAttribute('data-name', item.name)`. And later they read `row.getAttribute('data-name')` and pass as name to addApproverRow -> createChip uses textContent. Safe.
Potential HTML injection via `avatarColor`? no.
Potential accessibility issue not relevant.
Let me check for a real functional bug: In `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig`, function `ensureAutCriarSelectOption` appends an option to the select and the matching `.custom-modern-option` in options box. But it doesn't respect options that were removed by the refresh function. That's fine.
Another real potential bug: `syncAutCriarSelectFromCustomUi` uses `setAutCriarCustomSelectValueSilent(selectId, uiVal)`. Wait; sync compares current to uiVal but `uiVal` = selected data-value. It then only sets if `uiVal && uiVal !== currentVal`. OK.
But note `AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS.forEach(syncAutCriarSelectFromCustomUi);` - The forEach passes (value, index, array) as args to function syncAutCriarSelectFromCustomUi(selectId) which ignores extra args; fine.
Let me look at validation: descricao required? In old code descricao was required? The new required validation list: titulo, areaId, responsavelId, tipo, requisitos, descricao. OK.
One issue: The diff removed the earlier check that responsavel was required — it's still there. OK.
Wait—the removal of `descricao` check at old position and re-added at the end. But now there's also requirement that at least one requisito exists - present.
Now consider reading of `readAutCriarSelectValue('autCriarTipo')`: tipo values are string labels not int; readAutCriarSelectId parses int returns 0 for tipo but they use readAutCriarSelectValue for tipo. Good.
Now consider `markAutCriarSelectInvalid(selectId)`:
```
var $trigger = $sel.closest('.aut-criar-modal-select-wrap').find('.custom-modern-select-trigger');
```
`.closest()` from select element goes up the DOM; if select is inside a wrapper with class aut-criar-modal-select-wrap, then find trigger inside. OK.
Now let me think about something: Since AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS includes select elements within wrappers, but for autCriarTipo and others, when readonly disables select... they call `.prop('disabled', readonly)`. Custom selects' trigger disabled states not updated? maybe minor.
Now check `_modal_authorization_form.html.twig`: They added hidden inputs? They removed? They added fields but I don't see `autCriarArea`, `autCriarAprovador` etc as hidden inputs. Wait the selects themselves are real `<select>` from custom_select include with name autCriarArea? Actually the custom_select renders select with id/name. In HTML, a select with name will be included in form submission, but since form submit is intercepted via ajax and payload built from .val() reads, fine.
Now about the diff in `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig` changing the `autActionsCell` logic: it moved the Visualizar button out of the `ssmaCanCreateAuthorization` block, so that visualizar is now always added. That's intended: view action available regardless of create permission. Good.
But there might be an issue: previously, the actions cell had edit/delete etc only under canCreate; now `autActionsCell` includes the visualizar button always but the editing buttons inside permission guard. Good.
But does view rely on a modal for visualization that is only accessible...? Not in this diff, likely pre-existing.
Let me search for `aut_authorization_types` injection in hub controller (other file changed: SsmaAutomationService just -1 line). We can't comment on files outside review group. But cross-checking: The settings template reads `aut_authorization_types`, `aut_authorization_approver_members`, `aut_authorization_approver_roles`, `aut_authorization_use_members`, `aut_authorization_use_roles`, `allMembers`, `aut_company_roles`. Those may or may not be passed by the controller (not in the review set). Possibly fine.
Let me now focus on the actual review for any remaining issues I can find that are not in the confirmed list. I'll read the files to look for specific bugs.
Let me examine the settings tab code more thoroughly for logic issues:
- `addTypeChip` adds chip and calls syncAllApproverAreaSelects then scheduleSave.
- Removing a type chip only via click on remove within typeChips.
- But type removal only from chips in typeChips. syncAllApproverAreaSelects removes from approver rows area keys no longer present and when kept.length===0 sets all areas; scheduleSave.
Potential issue: If a type is used by some authorization records and then deleted, this doesn't affect existing records; fine.
- The approver area select option values are the labels themselves; label case preserved.
Now `setRowAreas` normalizes keys and stores data-area-key attr as normalized label.
Hmm there's a subtle bug: createChip for area chips stores `data-type: 'area:' + labelKey(key)` and `data-area-key: key`. In `collectAreaKeys`, reads data-area-key, normalizeLabel. Good.
But for picker rows in `_modal_add_approver`, the chip `createChip(key, 'area:' + labelKey(key), { 'data-area-key': key }, true)`. same.
One nuance: createChip also stores data-type as `'area:'+labelKey(key)` in addition to data-area-key; used by hasChip? For area chips `hasChip` isn't used. OK.
Potential bug: duplicate area detection when value already present: they check every to avoid dup; but they rebuild area keys by reading from DOM chips; ok.
Now the `syncApproverMode` function: When useMembers is unchecked and useRoles is unchecked, force members on and persist again? It sets useMembers.checked = true and membersOn = true. That ensures at least one flag. But what about when useRoles is turned off leaving useMembers on? Fine.
Edge: When user unchecks Members (only roles left on), then unchecks Roles too: it rechecks Members. Good matches business rule.
But there's a mismatch: initial template default if both variables false sets govAuthUseMembers=true; govAuthUseRoles stays false; checks rendered accordingly. Good.
Potential bug in `persist`: `notifyError` calls `showToast` with args (message,'Erro','fas fa-times','bg-danger'). Whatever showToast signature. Not verify.
Another thing to check: In `submitPicker`, `notifyError` is used for validation error "Selecione pelo menos um aprovador." using error toast. Fine.
Wait - there is a potential functional issue: The main picker row area editing (limit to types) is presented for each person, but if the person row isn't selected (checked) yet, modifying area may be irrelevant because submit only adds checked ones. But they set checkbox.checked = true when a select change happens. However if user clicks the pill to edit areas but then closes without change and checkbox remains unchecked, fine.
Potential bug: `setPickerRowAreas` when allAreas false with areaKeys, sets wrap is-editing. But on submit the area assignments persist from chips even if unchecked. If user selects area via the select and checkbox gets checked, submit includes row. Fine.
Now consider a scenario: user checks all rows (check all), then adds areas. Good.
Potential XSS via user-controlled type labels: They are entered via input; length limited 80, duplicates ignored. Types are stored as chip text and also used as select option values (value = label). Since set textContent, fine. But type value may be something like `"><img ...>`. When persisted and later rendered elsewhere? In `ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes`, they create option with `.val(label)` and `.text(label)` - jQuery escapes. In the settings list they rebuild selects via `option.textContent`. Safe.
But when types are used as `data-value` in custom select and read back; values assigned to autCriarTipo select option value. Save payload `tipo` string may contain HTML-unsafe chars; backend may store as is. Display not part of this diff.
Now consider duplicate detection across picker area select when the select value is a label that might equal ALL_AREAS_LABEL ('Todas as Áreas')? Not a valid type likely but could a type be named 'Todas as Áreas'? Then area select would offer allOption first then the type label too. There's no guard against a user creating a type named 'Todas as Áreas' (reserved). If a type label equals ALL_AREAS_LABEL, then in the area select, choosing that type value 'Todas as Áreas' triggers ALL_AREAS branch (value === ALL_AREAS_VALUE? no, value would be 'Todas as Áreas' not '__all__'), wait option values: allOption value = ALL_AREAS_VALUE = '__all__'; type option value = label = 'Todas as Áreas'. So distinct. So fine.
Edge case: A type label equal '__all__'! Then in area select, user could pick it, but the branch for ALL_AREAS_VALUE checks value === '__all__' before adding to keys. Actually the option for that type has value label '__all__'. The select's change handler: `if (value === ALL_AREAS_VALUE) set all areas`. So choosing a type named '__all__' would mistakenly be treated as "all areas". Very contrived. Probably too minor.
Now check validation of max length: type input maxlength=80 attribute; but code doesn't enforce beyond attribute? Attribute enforces. Types can contain leading/trailing spaces trimmed.
Potential problem: pressing Enter adds type then `typeInput.value=''`. Good.
Now there is a potential logic bug regarding saving when the type is added as chip but then removed quickly within debounce period? They schedule save per add and per remove. Debounce coalesces. Good.
But if user edits chip types and approver areas and navigates quickly, confirmed finding 6 covers it. So skip.
Let's examine something about picker modal included inside settings tab which is inside a `display` toggled tab div; the cleanup loop in index.html.twig moves modals appended to body on document ready? Let's read that part of index.html.twig to see exactly what it does. Let me read index around lines 100-150.
Also, importantly: the settings tab include happens inside `{% if ssmaCanManageConfig %}` wrapping `tab_auth_configuracoes_content`. But the modal `_modal_add_approver` inside settings template gets its own CSS with `#govAuthAddApproverModal.modal` z-index etc.
Now reading the creation form change for `footer_justify_content: 'space-between'` and Cancel/Adicionar button in footer - that footer justify change may affect? They added only one button? Let me look at original footer. It's the same modal embed; footer content unchanged maybe. Not a functional problem.
Wait — modal form footer: `footer_justify_content: 'space-between'` implies two sides footer content present? Let me read the file to see the footer block includes possibly a left-side button like a delete or a link. Let's read.
Also need to verify `aut_modal_area_options` used for select labeled "Área Responsável *" with id `autCriarArea`. It includes `_custom_select` with `id/name 'autCriarArea'`. Hmm, the custom select may render a hidden input or wrapper. Should be okay given existing pattern used for autCriarResponsavel. Wait in the form diff, area row includes custom select wrapper. Fine.
Let me verify functions `setAutCriarCustomSelectValueSilent`, `resetAutCriarCustomSelect`, etc exist in create file; they preexist for responsavel/requisito. Yes.
Now potential bug: In `applyAutCriarModalFields` the function ensures area and tipo options exist then sets select value. But in the edit mode the modal could be opened for a record whose `tipo` corresponds to a removed type; ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes removed the option; ensure adds it back; if later the user saves the settings again... not important.
Let me look at the autActionsCell placement. Actually the view button was previously inside `ssmaCanCreateAuthorization` block which is weird; now it's always shown, good. But does the viewer (JS handler js-aut-criar-visualizar) rely on modal authorization form open readonly which might require permissions? Not in scope.
Now let's read the actual templates around the potentially issue areas to be thorough: I want to check `_modal_authorization_form.html.twig` for the `_custom_select` include parameters—particularly that `selected_value: ''` and options rendered. And inspect `aut_modal_tipo_options`: types from config may be stored as objects or strings? In settings template, aut_authorization_types is json encoded into initialTypes then collected. In form they loop aut_authorization_types, value typeLabel = item; if it's object arrays with id? In settings JSON uses labels strings. But `_tab_authorization_form` builds tipo options assuming each item is a string; `aut_modal_tipo_options` value and text typeLabel. But what does the hub controller pass as `aut_authorization_types`? Possibly array of strings (labels). In settings they treat types as strings too (aut_authorization_types json encoded and used as chip labels). So consistent.
Let me double-check `_modal_authorization_form.html.twig` for the `descricao` being moved to `mb-0` but previously the title-responsavel row used align-items flex-end with descricao, etc. Not functional.
But WAIT: there may be a bug: In create modal, the new fields Area, Tipo and Aprovador selects are real `<select>`s? Let me check the `_custom_select.html.twig` to understand. It renders a wrapper `.custom-modern-select-wrapper`, a trigger, and possibly hides the actual select? In many implementations, the custom select includes a hidden `<select>` used for value. If it includes the actual select with name/options, form value is from `.val()`.
Actually, need to verify reading value: `syncAutCriarSelectFromCustomUi` reads the selected `.custom-modern-option[aria-selected]` data-value vs `$sel.val()`. They then set `setAutCriarCustomSelectValueSilent`. This is pre-existing machinery, only generalized. Good.
Let me check potential bug: `AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS` includes `autCriarArea`, `autCriarResponsavel`, `autCriarAprovador`, `autCriarAprovadorRole`, `autCriarTipo`. In resetAutCriarModal, they loop and reset each select value. But if a select has an option appended earlier by ensureAutCriarSelectOption (e.g., editing an auth whose area was deleted), the appended option persists after reset, so next time opening create modal, an area option not in current list remains, allowing user to submit that stale area value. This is a minor maintainability/data issue. Could note but low.
Let me also verify type select option duplicate concern is real: after editing a removed-type authorization, ensureAutCriarSelectOption adds the option each time. Not persisted. After creating new (reset), the stale options are NOT cleared. Reset only sets select value empty. Since the select's underlying `<option>` list is unchanged (appended option remains), creating a fresh authorization could include stale option "Tipo X" for a type removed from config — user could select and submit a tipo that no longer exists in config. Not necessarily a bug, since old authorizations preserve such types.
But area options: `ensureAutCriarSelectOption('autCriarArea', areaId, aut.area_name...)` - the area option value is an int id, while options in the initial list use area.id. After editing a record whose area was deleted (soft delete?), appending an option with id allows resubmit. Hmm.
These are borderline, low priority.
Let me now check something perhaps more severe regarding contract: The settings tab's JS runs even if the create tab (which defines ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes) is absent. Guarded. Good.
Now the `initialTypes` hydration: they call addTypeChip in a loop for initial types; that calls scheduleSave guarded skipSave true, and syncAllApproverAreaSelects. During hydration, approverList rows already added by hydrateAssignments later? Order: `(initialTypes||[]).forEach(addTypeChip);` BEFORE hydrateAssignments. At this time approverList empty, so sync no-op. Fine. Then hydrateAssignments creates rows with areas from `item.area_keys`, requiring that those area keys exist in types list; but initial types chips already added so select includes them. Good. If stored area_keys reference a type not in initialTypes (deleted type removed but approver row still stored with area_key?), those area keys won't be in select options, but setRowAreas renders chip anyway (labels may not be in current types). syncAllApproverAreaSelects only runs when types change. Actually hydrateAssignments sets rows directly, then syncApproverMode. Wait after hydration, they don't call syncAllApproverAreaSelects again. But the row area chips include stale keys. On later save (any change triggers sync? no) maybe not. When persisted, backend should ignore unknown. Not a huge issue.
Actually wait: there's a deeper subtlety: hydrateAssignments passes `item.area_keys || []`. addApproverRow -> setRowAreas(row, allAreas, areaKeys). If allAreas true in stored item, fine. If not allAreas with keys, they must be subset of types. OK.
Potential timing issue: initialTypes.forEach(addTypeChip) adds chips, each schedules syncAllApproverAreaSelects; approver rows not yet created. OK.
Now think about the case where `aut_authorization_types` include labels whose normalized lower differs but duplicates... hasChip by data-type labelKey. Good.
Now let's evaluate XSS risk in `_modal_add_approver` since styles only; no.
Let me now check file `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig` for `window.ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes` — it rebuilds option list. It reads `current` value via `$select.val()` which returns value. Then option removal: `$select.find('option:not(:first)').remove();` This removes all except first placeholder. Then appends labels. If current value is in new labels, re-set. Good. But the removal of options: custom-modern-options list is rebuilt by iterating $select.find('option') after append; each option also appended. It uses `text` param and `data-value`. Good.
But note: the custom-modern-option uses `$.trim($(this).text())` but text could contain HTML? no, set with .text.
Now is there any issue of value vs id: In `ensureAutCriarSelectOption` appends option with value str but the text label; for autCriarArea the value is area id (numeric string) and label maybe name. Good.
But possible duplication when an option exists with same value but different text? skip.
Now let me consider the description field: they moved the "Descrição" textarea after requisitos; the description help text removed. The field appears right before contractor req wrap (d-none). In create flow earlier description was required; still required. Fine.
One likely bug: In the modal form diff, they removed the `Descrição` from its previous spot inside the title-responsavel-row? Actually descricao was a standalone .form-group between title/responsavel row and requisitos. Now it's placed after requisitos and made mb-0. Visual reordering is intended.
Now let me consider `aut-criar-modal-row` flex containers each containing two .form-group with margin-bottom:12px. The first row only has one .form-group (Area/Tipo). Actually Tipo row: they wrapped just Tipo group in a row (single). Good.
Potential issue: In the row with aprovador and cargo, the hint paragraph below; OK.
Now there's an important nuance: `Título` field label with required `*`. And Tipo required.
I'll look at maybe a missing hidden input/values for Area and Tipo being sent? They're sent as payload fields (area_id and tipo). The backend not in this diff (confirmed finding 3 says backend contract missing — will skip). Actually confirmed #3 refers to missing backend handling? Confirmed #3 is ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers empty. The missing backend contract is listed as confirmed #2. Yes. So skip.
Given that the contract mismatch (backend not reading new fields) is already a confirmed finding, I shouldn't repeat.
Now look at other cross-file mismatch issues not repeated:
- In settings file, the call `window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers(res.approver_members || payload.approver_members);` only passes approver members (not roles) to a no-op function (confirmed #3). skip.
- Now think about who populates options for the create form selects (`aut_modal_aprovador_options`, `aut_modal_aprovador_role_options`, `aut_modal_area_options`) - These are derived from `allMembers`, `aut_company_roles`, `aut_company_areas`. Are `aut_company_areas` and `aut_company_roles` provided by the hub controller (out of scope)? Presumably yes in controller of this branch, but we cannot verify. Given merge includes PHP changed 1 file (SsmaAutomationService minus a line?) other file is in different change not review group. Possibly hub not in these changed files (only twig+php). Wait the branch touches 6 files twig=5 php=1; the review group only shows the twig files. The php change may be GovernanceController not in review. Can't see. We won't comment.
Let me do targeted reading of a few spots in templates to confirm precise issues and find new ones.
First, index.html.twig cleanup loop lines 120-150.
Let me read it.
Second, read _tab_authorizations_create around 1600-1750 and 1990-2070 to check `autCriarDescricao` still in DOM etc.
Actually we need to not overdo. Let me identify real new issues by reasoning carefully.
New possible issue: In `_tab_authorizations_create`, inside `applyAutCriarModalFields` they call `setAutCriarSelectValue('autCriarArea', areaId)` even if areaId empty — good. Then `ensureAutCriarSelectOption('autCriarTipo', tipo, tipo);` with tipo '' returns early since str empty. Good.
Now note `aut` mapping: editing payload from server may return `area_id` etc. but server presumably not saving these (confirmed backend contract gap). So applyAutCriarModalFields reads fields that won't exist yet — dead code but not harmful.
Another potential bug: In create tab modal "view" (visualizar) mode? applyAutCriarModalFields called on view as well, requiring data. Fields can be null. Fine.
Potential bug: the create tab now marks `descricao` invalid if empty; plus reads from `aut.descricao || aut.descricao_exibicao`. OK.
Let me examine the settings page validation: they send POST JSON to endpoint. In the HTML `<script>` block they call `{{ path('governance_authorization_config_save')|json_encode|raw }}`. That route name is new; if the route doesn't exist (php in another change not deployed?), but in same feature branch likely present. If route missing, Symfony path() throws exception rendering template error. Not verifiable here.
Potential injection: Twig `|json_encode|raw` used to inject data; data from PHP array could contain `</script>`; raw JSON inside script element can break out if strings contain `</script>`. Types are user-entered labels (up to 80 chars) potentially containing `</script>`! If a malicious admin types a type label `</script><script>alert(1)</script>`, that string is stored in DB (types saved by admin). Then the settings template renders initialTypes as `{{ aut_authorization_types|default([])|json_encode|raw }}` inside a `<script>` element. If the label contains `</script>`, the JSON breaks out of the script context and executes raw HTML/script — stored XSS! However this content is in the settings tab only visible to admins who manage config (they themselves would input the payload). Also could be an XSS when another admin views settings page. If types are user-provided by one admin and viewed by other admins, stored XSS is plausible. But similar injection also occurs in create tab's tipo options building in Twig loops with attributes (escape). Yet the settings script raw JSON is the concern.
The same pattern existed possibly elsewhere in project (they often use `|json_encode|raw` in script tags). It's a known risk in many templates here? Let me check other templates to see whether using `json_encode` in script for user-controlled data without a safe approach is common. Even if common, could still flag as XSS concern. But is this really new? Many Twig templates do `{{ something|json_encode|raw }}`. Typically `|json_encode` produces valid JS but doesn't escape `<` for inline script. Twig provides `|escape('js')` contexts. Actually inline `<script>` block containing `</script>` breaks out. To mitigate, use `{{ data|json_encode|e('js') }}`? Not reliable either. The safest is to store in data attribute or use `{% if ... %}` per item with escaping.
However, note json_encode will escape forward slash? Twig's json_encode outputs `"<\/script>"`? PHP json_encode escapes `/`? By default PHP json_encode does NOT escape slashes unless JSON_UNESCAPED_SLASHES is not set... PHP default escapes slashes as `\/`! Actually PHP json_encode escapes forward slashes by default (converts `/` to `\/`), so `</script>` becomes `<\/script>`. Let's recall: json_encode('</script>') returns "\"<\\/script>\""? Yes, PHP's json_encode escapes forward slashes to `\/` by default. Twig uses json_encode PHP function by default (no flags) which includes JSON_HEX_TAG? Twig passes options optionally. Twig's `json_encode` filter calls json_encode with $options default 0 → flags 0. PHP json_encode default escapes `/`? The documentation: "json_encode escapes slashes by default" — Yes, by default forward slashes are escaped as `\/`. So `</script>` becomes `<\/script>`, safe from breaking script tag. So probably not XSS. So fine.
Let me think about newline characters in type labels: `\n` etc allowed? normalizeLabel collapses whitespace. But input maxlength 80 and single-line input can't type newline. OK.
Now examine: in create form Twig, options values are `member.id`, `role.id` (ints) and `area.id`. When building `<select>`, fine.
Let me look for actual code-level bug: In `_modal_authorization_form`, aut_modal_tipo_options built from aut_authorization_types where each `typeLabel` string. But in create JS `applyAutCriarModalFields` tipo = aut.tipo||aut.tipo_autorizacao. Type value corresponds to a label stored as option value. On a fresh create after config types load via ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes, options are labels. Good.
Potential subtle bug: `ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes` runs on settings save; but if the create modal is currently open in edit mode with a selected tipo that equals a removed type, refresh removes options and resets select to empty (because current value no longer present), then... Actually function: current is value; labels new; removes options; if current in labels set select value else reset. If modal open editing an existing authorization with old type removed, the tipo silently cleared → saving would validate tipo required, blocking save until user re-selects. Could be intended.
Okay now let me examine settings template's use of `aut_authorization_use_members/roles` and the switch cards more closely; any mismatch between the checkbox toggling and `is-active` on card? `bindOptionCard` click on card toggles checkbox and dispatches change; checkbox change listener = syncApproverMode toggles is-active and scheduleSave. Clicking the checkbox itself returns early and native change fires. OK.
But clicking the label inside card: they return (not toggling) because label toggles checkbox natively (label for attribute). But wait: In the DOM, the `<label>` is inside the card div with for checkbox; clicking label triggers checkbox toggle natively and returns early in card handler to avoid double-toggle. Good.
But the div with role="button" and class option; clicking anywhere except checkbox/label toggles. However they also used a nested `label for` inside the card and the card div itself has class `.gov-auth-settings-option` plus `role="button"`. When card clicked and target is label text inside, event.target is label, returns early — native toggling toggles checkbox (good), change event bubbles, sync. Fine.
Now, check `govAuthApproverMembersBtn` click opens picker kind member; rolesBtn role.
Possible bug in `applyPickerFilters` regarding role rows: pickerMatchesFilters for roles returns true if no query. But if query typed for roles, they check name+email+position (all empty for role mapped objects) → searching role by name works since name set. Good.
Now, when pickerKind switches role, fillPickerFilters refills using catalogMembers; filters hidden but fill anyway. Fine.
Potential bug: filter values retained for members across opens since resetPickerFilters clears. Good.
Now consider checking `pickerCheckAll` selecting rows already excluded by filters but currently visible; correct.
Potential bug: after submitting picker and later reopening, excluded items filter based on hasApproverRow; works.
Now a significant one: `renderPickerRows` -> items includes role rows from catalogRoles. But catalogRoles = aut_company_roles which may be an array of objects with 'id' and 'name'. Good.
Let's focus on identify at least some issues to report that are not in the confirmed list, being cautious not to duplicate. Maybe:
New issue candidate A: The `allMembers` and `aut_company_roles` used by picker are encoded with `|json_encode|raw` in the settings template. If these include sensitive attributes? They're members with position, team_names, employment_bond, email. That's directory-ish. Fine.
Candidate B: Duplicate `title` description? nah.
Candidate C: The `_modal_authorization_form.html.twig` new `aut_modal_aprovador_options` adds ALL members (allMembers). If the company is big, huge `<select>` options: performance/UX. This is a minor perf note. Also aprovador picker in settings uses filters/search but the modal form uses plain selects with all members — could be thousands of options rendered on every modal open. Consider not flagging.
Actually more interesting: For "Aprovador da Autorização" they use a plain custom select of all members, whereas the new settings picker has searchable modal with team/cargo filters. Inconsistent, but not a bug.
Let's read the create template around modal init to check `setAutCriarModalReadonly` disables custom selects including autCriarTipo etc. Custom select wrappers: pointer-events none applied to `.aut-criar-modal-select-wrap`. The selects `#autCriarArea` etc are inside `.aut-criar-modal-select-wrap`? Yes wrapped in a div.aut-criar-modal-select-wrap. Good.
Potential bug in `setAutCriarModalReadonly(false)` on create—it doesn't re-enable pointer events for those newly added selects? It clears pointer-events for all wrap. Good.
Another: In applyAutCriarModalFields for readonly view mode, maybe disable select and set readonly on inputs. It's the same function.
Now check JS: When opening the create modal initially, are the new selects' values empty? resetAutCriarModal resets AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS which includes all 5 selects, via setAutCriarSelectValue('',...) which calls resetAutCriarCustomSelect. This function probably resets both select and UI. Good.
But one nuance: `autCriarAprovador`, `autCriarAprovadorRole` aren't required so resetting fine.
Potential issue: `ensureAutCriarSelectOption` appends option to native `<select>` AND a matching `.custom-modern-option` div, but the custom-modern-options box may be already open with existing options; the newly appended option isn't sorted; fine.
Now, real potential bug: `markAutCriarSelectInvalid` calls MV.markInvalid($sel) and MV.markInvalid($trigger). If MV exists, `$sel` may be hidden select with custom overlay; mark invalid probably toggles `.is-invalid` classes and maybe adds tooltips; they call MV with trigger too. Previously they called MV.markInvalid($('#autCriarResponsavel')) and MV.markInvalid($('.custom-modern-select-trigger')). For select with wrapper:has(#id). New generic function uses `$sel.closest('.aut-criar-modal-select-wrap')` then find trigger. Wait check: The modal form new select wrappers: `<div class="aut-criar-modal-select-wrap">` wrapping include of `_custom_select`. So the native select presumably is inside `.aut-criar-modal-select-wrap`. Yes `closest` finds it. OK.
But wait: the earlier existing ones also are inside `.aut-criar-modal-select-wrap`? yes.
Now something to verify: Is `descricao` no longer inside a `.form-group` that had `mb-0` earlier? They moved descricao to last form-group mb-0. Contractor req wrap d-none with aria-hidden true and label remains. Fine.
But wait, the requirement list in the review prompt: "Comentário sempre em português, direto e sem jargão na primeira frase".
Now let's identify new, non-confirmed issues to add. Let me review a couple of things more concretely by reading the files.
Let me read index.html.twig full JS context near the modal list at ~120-150 to ensure no issue with adding govAuthAddApproverModal to body only if settings rendered? Actually this cleanup runs for list of modal ids but only when tab present. `govAuthAddApproverModal` is rendered only if settings tab present (ssmaCanManageConfig). And the forEach checks `el &&`; guards missing. Good.
Now the modal embed uses bootstrap classes; does `.forEach` move to body also require the modal's CSS z-index set to 1200 (since embedded maybe within a scrollable container)? They added z-index 1200. Fine.
Let me read _tab_authorizations_settings around lines to double-check duplicated `id` attributes with the _modal_add_approver CSS: `.gov-auth-picker-*` CSS defined in modal partial (global scope!). Since the settings CSS is scoped to `#governance_auth_settings_content` or with `#govAuthAddApproverModal` prefixes, but the picker CSS `.gov-auth-picker-search` etc are NOT scoped (defined in the modal partial globally, unprefixed). The settings page has no other picker elements. Fine.
Now consider whether the modal is moved to body (index cleanup). If modal in body outside #governance_auth_settings_content, the CSS for `.gov-auth-settings-chip` inside modal uses selector `#govAuthAddApproverModal .gov-auth-settings-chip` defined in modal file. Good (prefix). Also settings file defines `#governance_auth_settings_content .gov-auth-settings-chip`. Since modal moved to body, chips inside modal rely on modal-file CSS. Good. Nice.
Now one more potential issue: when settings tab gets re-rendered or toggled, the modal could be duplicated? The cleanup moves modal to body once; if Twig re-renders tab content via AJAX (like when clicking tabs?), index page probably uses static tabs. No re-render.
Now let me examine the autosave race: scheduleSave debounce 400ms, multiple overlapping saves have seq guard. But a failed save is last seq maybe loses subsequent updates. Confirmed #6 covers silent data loss broadly. Not repeat.
Let me check skipSave flag: after init skipSave=false. On initial hydrate they call scheduleSave but skip guard prevents. However `syncApproverMode()` at end: scheduleSave -> skipSave still true; then set false. Good. But wait: hydrateAssignments calls addApproverRow with silent undefined -> default false; scheduleSave invoked. OK.
Hmm, actually hydrateAssignments is invoked BEFORE syncApproverMode, and skipSave true so fine.
Now consider: initial rendering uses `skipSave = true`; after everything set to false. But addTypeChip for initial types also calls syncAllApproverAreaSelects. That's before approver rows added. Fine.
One thing: `addTypeChip` sets type chips; on removal of type chips via the typeChips click handler, they call syncAllApproverAreaSelects. This iterates rows, and for rows not all-areas: collects keys filtering allowed; setRowAreas(row, kept.length===0, kept). setRowAreas when kept empty sets all areas true and rebuilds. That means removing a type converts any approver restricted only to that type back to "Todas as Áreas", which silently broadens approver scope. Business-wise, arguably an approver limited to specific types that no longer exist should maybe become all-areas (could instead become empty or keep no areas). This is a design decision, probably intended (fallback all areas). But combined with auto-save it might be risky? Eh.
Potential real bug: duplicate id attribute in modal? The modal partial `_modal_add_approver.html.twig` included within settings tab, plus the cleanup JS in index moves the modal to body at page load. Then the modal's parent is body. Fine.
Now consider if the settings tab content is loaded on the same page as `_modal_authorization_form` which also has `.gov-auth-settings-chip` styles? The create form uses ssma-shared-selection-tag. Not conflicting.
Now let's look more carefully at something in the create JS new function `ensureAutCriarSelectOption`: it appends `<option>` to $select but also tries `$optionsBox` only if wrapper found. But note native select is hidden; value setter works.
I think there's a possible subtle issue: In the create modal form markup, the new selects include area/aprovador etc. Are there hidden inputs for them, i.e., the form submits normally? Actually submit intercepted. The `.val()` on a native select works regardless.
But `syncAutCriarSelectFromCustomUi` reads from the `.custom-modern-select` UI and compares to `$sel.val()`. This is preexisting mechanism. When we programmatically set select value via `setAutCriarCustomSelectValueSilent`, does it update both the select and UI? presumably. Reset etc preexisting.
Let me read the create template to understand pre-existing functions' exact behavior to detect a bug in the new generalized usage.
Actually we have limited time; maybe I should read lines 1200-1300 and 1690-1750 of create file, and lines of settings for hidden bugs.
Let me start reading files now.
Vou revisar os arquivos do grupo. Primeiro, vou ler o contexto relevante para confirmar possíveis problemas novos (sem repetir os achados já confirmados).
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig", "start_line": 55, "end_line": 150}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig (Total lines: 208)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 55-150
55| {% if ssmaCanCreateAuthorization|default(false) %}
56| <div id="tab_auth_criar_content"
57| class="tab-panel"
58| style="display:{% if defaultAutTab == 'tab_auth_criar' %}block{% else %}none{% endif %};">
59| {% include 'governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig' %}
60| </div>
61| {% endif %}
62|
63| {% if ssmaCanManageConfig|default(false) %}
64| <div id="tab_auth_requisitos_content"
65| class="tab-panel"
66| style="display:{% if defaultAutTab == 'tab_auth_requisitos' %}block{% else %}none{% endif %};">
67| {% include 'governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_config.html.twig' %}
68| </div>
69|
70| <div id="tab_auth_configuracoes_content"
71| class="tab-panel"
72| style="display:{% if defaultAutTab == 'tab_auth_configuracoes' %}block{% else %}none{% endif %};">
73| {% include 'governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig' %}
74| </div>
75| {% endif %}
76|
77| {% if ssmaCanManagePermissions|default(false) %}
78| <div id="tab_auth_permissao_content"
79| class="tab-panel governance-authorization-permissions-tab"
80| style="display:{% if defaultAutTab == 'tab_auth_permissao' %}block{% else %}none{% endif %};">
81| {% include 'ssma/partials/_tab_permissions.html.twig' with {
82| ssmaPermissionProduct: 'ssma-authorization',
83| ssmaPermissionTabId: 'gov_auth_permissions'
84| } %}
85| </div>
86| {% endif %}
87|</section>
88|{% include 'components/_modal_confirm_multiple.html.twig' %}
89|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_deactivate.html.twig' %}
90|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_reactivate.html.twig' %}
91|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_in_use.html.twig' %}
92|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_delete.html.twig' %}
93|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_delete_blocked.html.twig' %}
94|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_delete.html.twig' %}
95|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_in_use.html.twig' %}
96|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_delete_blocked.html.twig' %}
97|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_deactivate.html.twig' %}
98|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_reactivate.html.twig' %}
99|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_requirement_form.html.twig' %}
100|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_offcanvas_requirement_detail.html.twig' %}
101|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_offcanvas_authorization_detail.html.twig' %}
102|{% include 'ssma/partials/_modal_delete_confirm.html.twig' %}
103|{% endblock %}
104|
105|{% block javascripts %}
106| {% include 'governance/partials/_hub_component_assets.html.twig' %}
107| {{ parent() }}
108| <script src="{{ asset('js/metahuman-standard/components/_modal_offcanvas.js') }}"></script>
109| <script>
110| (function () {
111| function hoistGovAuthDetailOffcanvasToBody() {
112| var wrapper = document.getElementById('govAuthDetail-offcanvas-wrapper');
113| var offcanvasModal = document.getElementById('govAuthDetail');
114| if (wrapper && wrapper.parentNode !== document.body) {
115| document.body.appendChild(wrapper);
116| }
117| if (offcanvasModal && offcanvasModal.parentNode !== document.body) {
118| document.body.appendChild(offcanvasModal);
119| }
120|
121| var condWrapper = document.getElementById('govAuthCondDetail-offcanvas-wrapper');
122| var condOffcanvasModal = document.getElementById('govAuthCondDetail');
123| if (condWrapper && condWrapper.parentNode !== document.body) {
124| document.body.appendChild(condWrapper);
125| }
126| if (condOffcanvasModal && condOffcanvasModal.parentNode !== document.body) {
127| document.body.appendChild(condOffcanvasModal);
128| }
129| }
130|
131| function hoistGovAuthCondModalToBody() {
132| [
133| 'modalAdicionarAut',
134| 'governanceAuthCondModal',
135| 'govAuthCondDeleteModal',
136| 'govAuthCondDeleteBlockedModal',
137| 'govAuthCondInUseModal',
138| 'govAuthCondDeactivateModal',
139| 'govAuthCondReactivateModal',
140| 'autAuthorizationDeleteModal',
141| 'autAuthorizationDeleteBlockedModal',
142| 'govAuthAddApproverModal'
143| ].forEach(function (id) {
144| var el = document.getElementById(id);
145| if (el && el.parentNode !== document.body) {
146| document.body.appendChild(el);
147| }
148| });
149| }
150|
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig", "start_line": 1215, "end_line": 1310}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig (Total lines: 2423)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1215-1310
1215|
1216| function flushAutCriarPendingRequisitoSelection() {
1217| flushAutCriarPendingTagSelection(AUT_REQ_TAG_CONFIG);
1218| }
1219|
1220| function flushAutCriarPendingContractorReqSelection() {
1221| flushAutCriarPendingTagSelection(AUT_CONTRACTOR_REQ_TAG_CONFIG);
1222| }
1223|
1224| function syncAutCriarSelectFromCustomUi(selectId) {
1225| var $sel = $('#' + selectId);
1226| if (!$sel.length) {
1227| return;
1228| }
1229| var currentVal = String($sel.val() || '');
1230| var $wrapper = $sel.closest('.custom-modern-select-wrapper');
1231| if (!$wrapper.length) {
1232| return;
1233| }
1234| var $selectedUi = $wrapper.find('.custom-modern-option.is-selected, .custom-modern-option.selected').first();
1235| if (!$selectedUi.length) {
1236| return;
1237| }
1238| var uiVal = String($selectedUi.attr('data-value') || '');
1239| if (uiVal && uiVal !== currentVal) {
1240| setAutCriarCustomSelectValueSilent(selectId, uiVal);
1241| }
1242| }
1243|
1244| function syncAutCriarResponsavelFromCustomUi() {
1245| syncAutCriarSelectFromCustomUi('autCriarResponsavel');
1246| }
1247|
1248| function rebuildAutCriarRequisitoCustomOptions($select) {
1249| if (!$select || !$select.length) {
1250| return;
1251| }
1252| var $wrapper = $select.closest('.custom-modern-select-wrapper');
1253| if (!$wrapper.length) {
1254| return;
1255| }
1256| var $optionsBox = $wrapper.find('.custom-modern-options');
1257| if (!$optionsBox.length) {
1258| return;
1259| }
1260| $optionsBox.empty();
1261| $select.find('option').each(function () {
1262| var val = String($(this).val() || '');
1263| var text = $.trim($(this).text());
1264| $optionsBox.append(
1265| $('<div>', {
1266| 'class': 'custom-modern-option',
1267| 'data-value': val,
1268| text: text
1269| })
1270| );
1271| });
1272| syncAutCriarCustomSelectOptions($select);
1273| resetAutCriarCustomSelect('autCriarRequisitoAdd', '');
1274| updateAutCriarTagSelectCountLabel(AUT_REQ_TAG_CONFIG);
1275| }
1276|
1277| function syncAutCriarCustomSelectOptions($select) {
1278| if (!$select || !$select.length) {
1279| return;
1280| }
1281| var $wrapper = $select.closest('.custom-modern-select-wrapper');
1282| if (!$wrapper.length) {
1283| return;
1284| }
1285| var available = {};
1286| $select.find('option').each(function () {
1287| var val = String($(this).val() || '');
1288| if (val !== '') {
1289| available[val] = true;
1290| }
1291| });
1292| $wrapper.find('.custom-modern-option').each(function () {
1293| var $option = $(this);
1294| var val = String($option.attr('data-value') || '');
1295| if (val === '') {
1296| return;
1297| }
1298| $option.toggleClass('is-hidden', !available[val]);
1299| });
1300| }
1301|
1302| function setAutCriarCustomSelectValueSilent(selectId, value) {
1303| var cleanId = String(selectId || '').replace(/^#/, '');
1304| if (!cleanId) {
1305| return;
1306| }
1307| var el = document.getElementById(cleanId);
1308| if (!el) {
1309| return;
1310| }
Request #88
deepseek-v4-flash
P:43.5K C:215 CR:40.96K CW:0
2575ms
Reasoning
Let me read a bit more of index.html.twig bottom to see when hoist functions are invoked, and how the modal might be duplicated, e.g., called on each tab activation event etc.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 208, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig", "start_line": 150}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig (Total lines: 208)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 150-208
150|
151| window.hoistGovAuthDetailOffcanvasToBody = hoistGovAuthDetailOffcanvasToBody;
152|
153| function sanitizeOffcanvasFnSuffix(modalId) {
154| return String(modalId || '').replace(/[-_]/g, '');
155| }
156|
157| function closeGovAuthOffcanvasById(modalId) {
158| var closeFn = window['closeOffcanvas' + sanitizeOffcanvasFnSuffix(modalId)];
159| if (typeof closeFn === 'function') {
160| closeFn();
161| return;
162| }
163| var $wrapper = $('#' + modalId + '-offcanvas-wrapper');
164| $wrapper.removeClass('show');
165| $('.app-page-body').first().removeClass('offcanvas-active');
166| $('#' + modalId).modal('hide');
167| }
168|
169| function bindGovAuthOffcanvasDismissOutside(wrapperId, modalId) {
170| $(document).on('click.govAuthOffcanvas_' + modalId, function (e) {
171| var $wrapper = $('#' + wrapperId + '.show');
172| if (!$wrapper.length) {
173| return;
174| }
175| if ($(e.target).closest('[data-dismiss-offcanvas], .offcanvas-panel, .modal.show, .custom-modern-select.open, .custom-modern-options').length) {
176| return;
177| }
178| if (!$(e.target).closest('#' + wrapperId).length) {
179| return;
180| }
181| if (modalId === 'govAuthCondDetail' && typeof window.closeGovAuthCondDetailOffcanvas === 'function') {
182| window.closeGovAuthCondDetailOffcanvas();
183| return;
184| }
185| closeGovAuthOffcanvasById(modalId);
186| });
187| }
188|
189| hoistGovAuthDetailOffcanvasToBody();
190| hoistGovAuthCondModalToBody();
191|
192| $(function () {
193| $('#modalAdicionarAut, #governanceAuthCondModal').attr({
194| 'data-backdrop': 'true',
195| 'data-keyboard': 'true'
196| });
197|
198| if (typeof setupModalOffcanvas === 'function') {
199| setupModalOffcanvas();
200| }
201|
202| bindGovAuthOffcanvasDismissOutside('govAuthDetail-offcanvas-wrapper', 'govAuthDetail');
203| bindGovAuthOffcanvasDismissOutside('govAuthCondDetail-offcanvas-wrapper', 'govAuthCondDetail');
204| });
205| })();
206| </script>
207|{% endblock %}
208|
file_read
3ms
Failed
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 2200, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig", "start_line": 2060}
Result
file "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig" has only 1224 lines, requested range 2060-2200
Request #89
deepseek-v4-flash
P:44.44K C:286 CR:43.65K CW:0
3292ms
Reasoning
Wait - _tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig has only 1224 lines total? But diff said 1223 lines added, consistent. Let me read relevant sections.
Let me note that index.html.twig: the tab nav probably is `autorizacaoTabs` merge. The new modal add approver is included in settings tab (inside ssmaCanManageConfig). The `hoistGovAuthCondModalToBody` hoists `govAuthAddApproverModal` only if present. Fine.
But consider `data-dismiss="modal"` in the modal footer Cancel button. For modals hoisted to body with bootstrap, data-dismiss works.
Now let me re-read parts of settings file where possible issues (not confirmed) could be. Let me read lines 200-400, and 400-600 for logic details.
Actually let me re-scan the entire settings file carefully for bugs.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 1224, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig", "start_line": 700}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig (Total lines: 1224)
IS_TRUNCATED: true
LINE_RANGE: 700-1199
700| return member.position;
701| }));
702| fillFilterSelect(pickerFilterTeam, 'Time', (catalogMembers || []).reduce(function (acc, member) {
703| return acc.concat(member.team_names || []);
704| }, []));
705| fillFilterSelect(pickerFilterBond, 'Vínculo', (catalogMembers || []).map(function (member) {
706| return bondLabel(member.employment_bond);
707| }).filter(Boolean));
708| }
709|
710| function pickerCatalog() {
711| if (pickerKind === 'role') {
712| return (catalogRoles || []).map(function (role) {
713| return {
714| id: role.id,
715| name: role.name || ('Cargo #' + role.id),
716| email: '',
717| position: '',
718| team_names: [],
719| employment_bond: ''
720| };
721| });
722| }
723| return (catalogMembers || []).map(function (member) {
724| return {
725| id: member.id,
726| name: member.name || ('Membro #' + member.id),
727| email: member.email || '',
728| position: member.position || '',
729| team_names: member.team_names || [],
730| employment_bond: member.employment_bond || ''
731| };
732| });
733| }
734|
735| function pickerMatchesFilters(item) {
736| var query = labelKey(pickerSearch && pickerSearch.value);
737| if (query) {
738| var haystack = labelKey(item.name + ' ' + (item.email || '') + ' ' + (item.position || ''));
739| if (haystack.indexOf(query) === -1) {
740| return false;
741| }
742| }
743| if (pickerKind !== 'member') {
744| return true;
745| }
746| var cargo = normalizeLabel(pickerFilterCargo && pickerFilterCargo.value);
747| if (cargo && labelKey(item.position) !== labelKey(cargo)) {
748| return false;
749| }
750| var team = normalizeLabel(pickerFilterTeam && pickerFilterTeam.value);
751| if (team && !(item.team_names || []).some(function (name) {
752| return labelKey(name) === labelKey(team);
753| })) {
754| return false;
755| }
756| var bond = normalizeLabel(pickerFilterBond && pickerFilterBond.value);
757| if (bond && labelKey(bondLabel(item.employment_bond)) !== labelKey(bond)) {
758| return false;
759| }
760| return true;
761| }
762|
763| function closePickerAreaEditors(exceptWrap) {
764| if (!pickerBody) {
765| return;
766| }
767| Array.prototype.forEach.call(pickerBody.querySelectorAll('.gov-auth-picker-area.is-editing'), function (wrap) {
768| if (wrap !== exceptWrap && !wrap.classList.contains('is-limited')) {
769| wrap.classList.remove('is-editing');
770| }
771| });
772| }
773|
774| function setPickerRowAreas(row, allAreas, areaKeys, keepSelectOpen) {
775| allAreas = !!allAreas;
776| areaKeys = Array.isArray(areaKeys) ? areaKeys.map(normalizeLabel).filter(Boolean) : [];
777| if (allAreas || areaKeys.length === 0) {
778| allAreas = true;
779| areaKeys = [];
780| }
781| row.setAttribute('data-all-areas', allAreas ? '1' : '0');
782| var wrap = row.querySelector('.gov-auth-picker-area');
783| var select = row.querySelector('.gov-auth-picker-area-select');
784| if (wrap) {
785| Array.prototype.slice.call(wrap.querySelectorAll('.gov-auth-settings-chip')).forEach(function (chip) {
786| chip.remove();
787| });
788| if (!allAreas) {
789| areaKeys.forEach(function (key) {
790| wrap.insertBefore(
791| createChip(key, 'area:' + labelKey(key), { 'data-area-key': key }, true),
792| select
793| );
794| });
795| }
796| wrap.classList.toggle('is-limited', !allAreas);
797| if (allAreas && !keepSelectOpen) {
798| wrap.classList.remove('is-editing');
799| } else if (!allAreas) {
800| wrap.classList.add('is-editing');
801| }
802| }
803| rebuildPickerAreaSelect(row);
804| }
805|
806| function visiblePickerRows() {
807| if (!pickerBody) {
808| return [];
809| }
810| return Array.prototype.filter.call(pickerBody.querySelectorAll('tr[data-id]'), function (row) {
811| return row.style.display !== 'none';
812| });
813| }
814|
815| function syncPickerCheckAll() {
816| if (!pickerCheckAll) {
817| return;
818| }
819| var rows = visiblePickerRows();
820| var checked = rows.filter(function (row) {
821| var input = row.querySelector('input[type="checkbox"]');
822| return input && input.checked;
823| });
824| pickerCheckAll.checked = rows.length > 0 && checked.length === rows.length;
825| pickerCheckAll.indeterminate = checked.length > 0 && checked.length < rows.length;
826| }
827|
828| function applyPickerFilters() {
829| if (!pickerBody) {
830| return;
831| }
832| Array.prototype.forEach.call(pickerBody.querySelectorAll('tr[data-id]'), function (row) {
833| var item = {
834| name: row.getAttribute('data-name') || '',
835| email: row.getAttribute('data-email') || '',
836| position: row.getAttribute('data-position') || '',
837| team_names: (row.getAttribute('data-teams') || '').split('|').filter(Boolean),
838| employment_bond: row.getAttribute('data-bond') || ''
839| };
840| row.style.display = pickerMatchesFilters(item) ? '' : 'none';
841| });
842| var empty = pickerBody.querySelector('.gov-auth-picker-empty-row');
843| var anyVisible = visiblePickerRows().length > 0;
844| if (empty) {
845| empty.style.display = anyVisible ? 'none' : '';
846| }
847| syncPickerCheckAll();
848| }
849|
850| function renderPickerRows() {
851| if (!pickerBody) {
852| return;
853| }
854| pickerBody.innerHTML = '';
855| var items = pickerCatalog().filter(function (item) {
856| return item.id && !hasApproverRow(pickerKind, item.id);
857| });
858| if (items.length === 0) {
859| var emptyRow = document.createElement('tr');
860| emptyRow.className = 'gov-auth-picker-empty-row';
861| var emptyCell = document.createElement('td');
862| emptyCell.colSpan = 3;
863| emptyCell.className = 'gov-auth-picker-empty';
864| emptyCell.textContent = pickerKind === 'role'
865| ? 'Todos os cargos já foram adicionados.'
866| : 'Todos os membros já foram adicionados.';
867| emptyRow.appendChild(emptyCell);
868| pickerBody.appendChild(emptyRow);
869| syncPickerCheckAll();
870| return;
871| }
872|
873| items.forEach(function (item) {
874| var row = document.createElement('tr');
875| row.setAttribute('data-id', String(item.id));
876| row.setAttribute('data-name', item.name);
877| row.setAttribute('data-email', item.email || '');
878| row.setAttribute('data-position', item.position || '');
879| row.setAttribute('data-teams', (item.team_names || []).join('|'));
880| row.setAttribute('data-bond', item.employment_bond || '');
881| row.setAttribute('data-all-areas', '1');
882|
883| var checkCell = document.createElement('td');
884| checkCell.className = 'gov-auth-picker-check';
885| var checkbox = document.createElement('input');
886| checkbox.type = 'checkbox';
887| checkbox.setAttribute('aria-label', 'Selecionar ' + item.name);
888| checkCell.appendChild(checkbox);
889|
890| var nameCell = document.createElement('td');
891| var person = document.createElement('div');
892| person.className = 'gov-auth-picker-person';
893| var avatar = document.createElement('span');
894| avatar.className = 'gov-auth-picker-avatar';
895| avatar.style.background = avatarColor(item.name);
896| avatar.textContent = String(item.name || '?').charAt(0).toUpperCase();
897| var nameWrap = document.createElement('div');
898| nameWrap.className = 'gov-auth-picker-name';
899| var strong = document.createElement('strong');
900| strong.textContent = item.name;
901| nameWrap.appendChild(strong);
902| if (pickerKind === 'member' && item.email) {
903| var email = document.createElement('span');
904| email.textContent = item.email;
905| nameWrap.appendChild(email);
906| }
907| person.appendChild(avatar);
908| person.appendChild(nameWrap);
909| nameCell.appendChild(person);
910|
911| var areaCell = document.createElement('td');
912| var areaWrap = document.createElement('div');
913| areaWrap.className = 'gov-auth-picker-area';
914| var pill = document.createElement('button');
915| pill.type = 'button';
916| pill.className = 'gov-auth-picker-area-pill';
917| pill.textContent = ALL_AREAS_LABEL;
918| var areaSelect = document.createElement('select');
919| areaSelect.className = 'gov-auth-picker-area-select';
920| areaSelect.setAttribute('aria-label', 'Áreas de aplicação de ' + item.name);
921| areaWrap.appendChild(pill);
922| areaWrap.appendChild(areaSelect);
923| areaCell.appendChild(areaWrap);
924|
925| row.appendChild(checkCell);
926| row.appendChild(nameCell);
927| row.appendChild(areaCell);
928| pickerBody.appendChild(row);
929| setPickerRowAreas(row, true, []);
930| });
931|
932| var filterEmpty = document.createElement('tr');
933| filterEmpty.className = 'gov-auth-picker-empty-row';
934| filterEmpty.style.display = 'none';
935| var filterEmptyCell = document.createElement('td');
936| filterEmptyCell.colSpan = 3;
937| filterEmptyCell.className = 'gov-auth-picker-empty';
938| filterEmptyCell.textContent = 'Nenhum resultado para os filtros selecionados.';
939| filterEmpty.appendChild(filterEmptyCell);
940| pickerBody.appendChild(filterEmpty);
941|
942| applyPickerFilters();
943| }
944|
945| function resetPickerFilters() {
946| if (pickerSearch) {
947| pickerSearch.value = '';
948| }
949| if (pickerFilterCargo) {
950| pickerFilterCargo.value = '';
951| }
952| if (pickerFilterTeam) {
953| pickerFilterTeam.value = '';
954| }
955| if (pickerFilterBond) {
956| pickerFilterBond.value = '';
957| }
958| if (pickerCheckAll) {
959| pickerCheckAll.checked = false;
960| pickerCheckAll.indeterminate = false;
961| }
962| }
963|
964| function openApproverPicker(kind) {
965| pickerKind = kind === 'role' ? 'role' : 'member';
966| if (pickerFilters) {
967| pickerFilters.classList.toggle('d-none', pickerKind !== 'member');
968| }
969| fillPickerFilters();
970| resetPickerFilters();
971| renderPickerRows();
972| window.jQuery('#govAuthAddApproverModal').modal('show');
973| window.setTimeout(function () {
974| if (pickerSearch) {
975| pickerSearch.focus();
976| }
977| }, 200);
978| }
979|
980| function closeApproverPicker() {
981| window.jQuery('#govAuthAddApproverModal').modal('hide');
982| }
983|
984| function submitPicker() {
985| var selected = pickerBody
986| ? Array.prototype.filter.call(pickerBody.querySelectorAll('tr[data-id]'), function (row) {
987| var input = row.querySelector('input[type="checkbox"]');
988| return input && input.checked;
989| })
990| : [];
991| if (selected.length === 0) {
992| notifyError('Selecione pelo menos um aprovador.');
993| return;
994| }
995| selected.forEach(function (row) {
996| var allAreas = row.getAttribute('data-all-areas') !== '0';
997| var areaKeys = collectAreaKeys(row);
998| addApproverRow(
999| pickerKind,
1000| row.getAttribute('data-id'),
1001| row.getAttribute('data-name'),
1002| allAreas,
1003| allAreas ? [] : areaKeys,
1004| true
1005| );
1006| });
1007| closeApproverPicker();
1008| scheduleSave();
1009| }
1010|
1011| function hydrateAssignments(items, kind) {
1012| (items || []).forEach(function (item) {
1013| if (!item || !item.id) {
1014| return;
1015| }
1016| addApproverRow(
1017| kind,
1018| item.id,
1019| item.name || ((kind === 'member' ? 'Membro #' : 'Cargo #') + item.id),
1020| item.all_areas !== false,
1021| item.area_keys || []
1022| );
1023| });
1024| }
1025|
1026| if (typeInput && typeChips) {
1027| typeInput.addEventListener('keydown', function (event) {
1028| if (event.key !== 'Enter') {
1029| return;
1030| }
1031| event.preventDefault();
1032| addTypeChip(typeInput.value);
1033| typeInput.value = '';
1034| });
1035| typeChips.addEventListener('click', function (event) {
1036| var removeBtn = event.target.closest('.gov-auth-settings-chip__remove');
1037| if (!removeBtn) {
1038| return;
1039| }
1040| var chip = removeBtn.closest('.gov-auth-settings-chip');
1041| if (chip) {
1042| chip.remove();
1043| syncAllApproverAreaSelects();
1044| scheduleSave();
1045| }
1046| });
1047| }
1048|
1049| if (approverList) {
1050| approverList.addEventListener('click', function (event) {
1051| var removeBtn = event.target.closest('.gov-auth-settings-chip__remove');
1052| if (!removeBtn) {
1053| return;
1054| }
1055| var chip = removeBtn.closest('.gov-auth-settings-chip');
1056| var row = removeBtn.closest('.gov-auth-approver-row');
1057| if (!chip || !row) {
1058| return;
1059| }
1060| if (chip.classList.contains('gov-auth-approver-row__person')) {
1061| row.remove();
1062| scheduleSave();
1063| return;
1064| }
1065| var areaKey = chip.getAttribute('data-area-key');
1066| if (!areaKey) {
1067| return;
1068| }
1069| chip.remove();
1070| var kept = collectAreaKeys(row);
1071| setRowAreas(row, kept.length === 0, kept);
1072| scheduleSave();
1073| });
1074| approverList.addEventListener('change', function (event) {
1075| var select = event.target.closest('.gov-auth-approver-area-select');
1076| if (!select) {
1077| return;
1078| }
1079| var row = select.closest('.gov-auth-approver-row');
1080| var value = String(select.value || '').trim();
1081| if (!row || !value) {
1082| return;
1083| }
1084| if (value === ALL_AREAS_VALUE) {
1085| setRowAreas(row, true, []);
1086| scheduleSave();
1087| return;
1088| }
1089| var keys = collectAreaKeys(row);
1090| if (keys.every(function (key) { return labelKey(key) !== labelKey(value); })) {
1091| keys.push(normalizeLabel(value));
1092| }
1093| setRowAreas(row, false, keys);
1094| scheduleSave();
1095| });
1096| }
1097|
1098| bindOptionCard(membersOption, useMembers);
1099| bindOptionCard(rolesOption, useRoles);
1100| if (membersBtn) {
1101| membersBtn.addEventListener('click', function () {
1102| openApproverPicker('member');
1103| });
1104| }
1105| if (rolesBtn) {
1106| rolesBtn.addEventListener('click', function () {
1107| openApproverPicker('role');
1108| });
1109| }
1110| if (pickerSearch) {
1111| pickerSearch.addEventListener('input', applyPickerFilters);
1112| }
1113| [pickerFilterCargo, pickerFilterTeam, pickerFilterBond].forEach(function (select) {
1114| if (select) {
1115| select.addEventListener('change', applyPickerFilters);
1116| }
1117| });
1118| if (pickerCheckAll) {
1119| pickerCheckAll.addEventListener('change', function () {
1120| visiblePickerRows().forEach(function (row) {
1121| var input = row.querySelector('input[type="checkbox"]');
1122| if (input) {
1123| input.checked = pickerCheckAll.checked;
1124| }
1125| });
1126| pickerCheckAll.indeterminate = false;
1127| });
1128| }
1129| if (pickerBody) {
1130| pickerBody.addEventListener('click', function (event) {
1131| var removeBtn = event.target.closest('.gov-auth-settings-chip__remove');
1132| if (removeBtn) {
1133| event.preventDefault();
1134| event.stopPropagation();
1135| var chip = removeBtn.closest('.gov-auth-settings-chip');
1136| var row = removeBtn.closest('tr[data-id]');
1137| if (!chip || !row) {
1138| return;
1139| }
1140| chip.remove();
1141| setPickerRowAreas(row, false, collectAreaKeys(row), true);
1142| return;
1143| }
1144| var pill = event.target.closest('.gov-auth-picker-area-pill');
1145| if (pill) {
1146| event.preventDefault();
1147| event.stopPropagation();
1148| var wrap = pill.closest('.gov-auth-picker-area');
1149| var select = wrap && wrap.querySelector('.gov-auth-picker-area-select');
1150| var row = pill.closest('tr');
1151| closePickerAreaEditors(wrap);
1152| if (wrap && select && row) {
1153| rebuildPickerAreaSelect(row);
1154| wrap.classList.add('is-editing');
1155| select.focus();
1156| }
1157| return;
1158| }
1159| if (event.target.closest('.gov-auth-picker-area')) {
1160| return;
1161| }
1162| var row = event.target.closest('tr[data-id]');
1163| if (!row || event.target.closest('input[type="checkbox"]')) {
1164| return;
1165| }
1166| var input = row.querySelector('input[type="checkbox"]');
1167| if (input) {
1168| input.checked = !input.checked;
1169| syncPickerCheckAll();
1170| }
1171| });
1172| pickerBody.addEventListener('change', function (event) {
1173| if (event.target.matches('input[type="checkbox"]')) {
1174| syncPickerCheckAll();
1175| return;
1176| }
1177| var select = event.target.closest('.gov-auth-picker-area-select');
1178| if (!select) {
1179| return;
1180| }
1181| var row = select.closest('tr[data-id]');
1182| var value = String(select.value || '').trim();
1183| if (!row || !value) {
1184| return;
1185| }
1186| if (value === ALL_AREAS_VALUE) {
1187| setPickerRowAreas(row, true, []);
1188| return;
1189| }
1190| var keys = collectAreaKeys(row);
1191| if (keys.every(function (key) { return labelKey(key) !== labelKey(value); })) {
1192| keys.push(normalizeLabel(value));
1193| }
1194| setPickerRowAreas(row, false, keys, true);
1195| var checkbox = row.querySelector('input[type="checkbox"]');
1196| if (checkbox) {
1197| checkbox.checked = true;
1198| syncPickerCheckAll();
1199| }
Note: Results truncated to 500 lines. Please narrow your line range.
Request #90
deepseek-v4-flash
P:49.95K C:116 CR:44.67K CW:0
1694ms
Reasoning
Let me continue to end of file for event blur and hydration and skipSave assignment.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 1224, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig", "start_line": 1199}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig (Total lines: 1224)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1199-1224
1199| }
1200| });
1201| pickerBody.addEventListener('blur', function (event) {
1202| var select = event.target.closest('.gov-auth-picker-area-select');
1203| if (!select) {
1204| return;
1205| }
1206| window.setTimeout(function () {
1207| var wrap = select.closest('.gov-auth-picker-area');
1208| if (wrap && !wrap.classList.contains('is-limited') && !wrap.contains(document.activeElement)) {
1209| wrap.classList.remove('is-editing');
1210| }
1211| }, 120);
1212| }, true);
1213| }
1214| if (pickerSubmit) {
1215| pickerSubmit.addEventListener('click', submitPicker);
1216| }
1217| (initialTypes || []).forEach(addTypeChip);
1218| hydrateAssignments(initialApproverMembers, 'member');
1219| hydrateAssignments(initialApproverRoles, 'role');
1220| syncApproverMode();
1221| skipSave = false;
1222|})();
1223|</script>
1224|
Request #91
deepseek-v4-flash
P:50.39K C:2.31K CR:50.05K CW:0
18878ms
Reasoning
Wait, line count: The file is 1224 lines, but earlier I mistakenly requested lines 2060+. Actually total 1224 lines but the "added" in diff is 1223 (excluding trailing). OK.
Now note something interesting: In settings file, `blur` listener at line 1201: after removing last area chip (line 1140-1141), `setPickerRowAreas(row, false, collectAreaKeys(row), true)` — collectAreaKeys returns [] after removal; so allAreas false and empty keys; function converts to allAreas true (line 777), then wrap toggled is-limited false; and because allAreas && !keepSelectOpen... keepSelectOpen true so does not remove is-editing. So the row returns to all-areas pill? Wait if allAreas true, setPickerRowAreas removes chips, doesn't add the ALL_AREAS pill back in the picker (there is no pill for all-areas; the pill is only displayed for all areas when not editing). Actually in the picker, the default pill with ALL_AREAS_LABEL is always present in DOM. When allAreas, pill shown and select hidden (unless editing). When removing last chip via is-limited row, then wrap becomes not-limited. But since keepSelectOpen true, it stays is-editing, so select still displayed with options. After blur the is-editing removed and pill displayed (Todas as Áreas). OK.
Now, let's look at the events about clicking the pill: after clicking, closePickerAreaEditors(wrap) closes other editors that aren't limited. But rows that are "is-limited" remain in editing (select open) even when opening a different row. Because they exclude `is-limited` in closePickerAreaEditors. So multiple limited rows can show the select at same time. Minor UI.
But wait, is-limited rows have select displayed even without is-editing? In setPickerRowAreas, `wrap.classList.toggle('is-limited', !allAreas);` plus CSS rule: `.gov-auth-picker-area.is-limited .gov-auth-picker-area-pill {display:none}`, `.is-limited .gov-auth-picker-area-select { display: inline-block; }`. So limited rows always show the select. Thus closing editors for limited rows makes no sense. So they remain select open - that's expected. All fine.
Now, in `setPickerRowAreas(row, false, areaKeys, keepSelectOpen)`: for a limited row area chips created with a remove button. The chips are `.gov-auth-settings-chip` inside wrap; CSS in modal file gives chip styling. On removing chips: keepSelectOpen true; still limited if remaining keys non-empty.
But potential issue: for a limited row (is-limited true), if user removes the last chip, setPickerRowAreas(row, false, [], true) => converts to allAreas. So limited select vanishes, pill returns but is-editing true. Actually they pass allAreas false; empty keys -> allAreas true. Good. Then the row reverts to all-areas but the checkbox is not auto-checked. Fine.
Now let me think about filter's empty row display after type changes while picker is open. Minor.
Now potential bug in `syncPickerCheckAll` when applyPickerFilters: The empty-first-row case (no members left) shows empty row with colspan 3 plus also appends filterEmpty row hidden. Fine.
Now consider the scenario of removing a member from the settings list while the picker modal is open: not possible; picker is modal.
OK.
Now let me think again about a distinct potential bug: In picker body click event for row toggling, when clicking anywhere on row (except checkbox/area) toggles check. But this handler is on pickerBody; clicking the row's pill handled separately and returns. Clicking area chips handled by removeBtn at start. Fine.
But wait, this click toggling only applies when clicking the row's cells. But the name/avatar cell click will toggle. Fine.
Now let me scan the top part of settings file (markup lines 1-360) again to double check usage of govAuthUseMembers fallback and rendering, plus the `allMembers` variable & missing elements.
Let me re-read lines 1-250 (JS) for correctness: I saw diff add all. Let me specifically look for the bug potential in `scheduleSave` with skipSave.
Let me view lines 1-120 for markup.
Actually I want to find NEW issues not in the confirmed list. Let me think about candidates:
1. Settings autosave lacks CSRF (confirmed #5). Not repeat.
2. Debounce no flush on navigation (confirmed #6). Not repeat.
3. God template concern & CSS duplication (confirmed #1, #4). Not repeat.
4. ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers empty (confirmed #3). Not repeat.
5. Backend contract for new fields (confirmed #2). Not repeat.
Let me search for further real issues:
Candidate: In `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig`, the persist call only refreshes `ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes` but not the approver select options in the modal form (the aprovador/cargo selects in create modal are not refreshed from config). But those come from allMembers/aut_company_roles so unaffected by config. Fine.
Candidate: `markAutCriarSelectInvalid` bug? Let me double-check the CSS selector changed from `:has(#id)` to `select.is-invalid`. But note that `MV.markInvalid` marks $sel (the native select, likely hidden/display none) and $trigger. If MV not present, adds is-invalid to $sel and $trigger. The CSS: `.aut-criar-modal-select-wrap:has(select.is-invalid) .custom-modern-select-trigger` AND `.custom-modern-select-trigger.is-invalid` — both border-color. `:has` support in browser (modern). Fine.
Now, in the else branch of clearing invalid classes on save (`$('#modalAdicionarAut .aut-criar-modal-select-wrap .custom-modern-select-trigger').removeClass('is-invalid')`) they clear all triggers. Good.
Candidate bug: On save validation failure, invalid classes set on native selects which are part of DOM inside wrapper? For custom select component (custom-modern-select), maybe the actual select is hidden; `.is-invalid` added to both. The trigger gets red border. OK.
Now, candidate issue about duplicate selections pending: In create JS they flush requesito selections etc. OK.
Candidate: The select options for aprovador (allMembers) are built at template render. But what if user opens create modal after settings member list used? aprovador options are allMembers — unchanged by config.
Candidate: In the create tab JS function `applyAutCriarModalFields` there's `ensureAutCriarSelectOption('autCriarAprovador', aprovadorId, (aut.aprovador && aut.aprovador.name) || '')`. If aprovadorId exists but not in the allMembers options list (e.g., inactive member or not in the fetched list), ensure option adds with text '' fallback str id. OK.
Now, let me examine cross-file: In settings partial, `SAVE_URL` uses `path('governance_authorization_config_save')`. Might be same name used for save endpoint that expects form-urlencoded not JSON; can't confirm from the review files. Out of group.
Candidate security issue: the config settings save endpoint presumably returns and also used csrf absent (confirmed). Could mention isolation by company missing? That's backend-side.
Let me consider whether a malicious low-privilege person can trigger the admin settings view? The tab is only rendered if ssmaCanManageConfig. The functions within create modal JS etc are rendered regardless. Guarded.
Candidate issue: When create modal is open AND settings hidden on page (default tab maybe settings tab not visible because create tab default) — doesn't matter.
Now, the `hoist` loop (index) appends `govAuthAddApproverModal` to body only once at DOM ready; but if the settings content is inside a tab panel that is `display:none`? At document ready all tabs exist; the modal inside display:none tab still appended to body. Good.
But subtle: In index, this hoist occurs for elements present in DOM at script execution (script is in `javascripts` block which comes after content rendering since it's `{% block javascripts %}` likely in the body bottom). Fine.
Now think about data attribute duplication: The modal partial has inline style z-index 1200 and index hoists the modal to body. Bootstrap `.modal` default z-index ~1050; being appended to body fine. But wait — style tag inside a file included inside tab content: Twig `<style>` will be inside the tab content div. This is not inside <head> but HTML5 allows style in body. Existing patterns in this project put <style> in partials frequently (evident in existing files). Not flag.
Now, is there a possible bug in `_modal_add_approver` partial CSS selectors? `.gov-auth-picker-*` are generic unprefixed. But other code in create template might have classes like `.gov-auth-picker-area`? These all belong to new settings only. Fine.
Let me look at the top part of settings file again (lines 1-700) — maybe catch something. Since I already read most of JS logic from diff, the important aspects around definitions:
`var initialTypes = {{ aut_authorization_types|default([])|json_encode|raw }};`
These initial data — server passes type objects (id, label?) or strings? Let me check how hub controller builds aut_authorization_types. We can't read it as out of group but maybe it's elsewhere available via search. Let me search the codebase for aut_authorization_types to see data shape. If types are arrays of strings (labels), OK. But might they be objects with `label` property? The create form expects strings (typeLabel). The settings `addTypeChip` expects a string too (normalizeLabel(rawValue) — if object, String(object) => '[object Object]'). Hmm! If server passes objects, both places break. Search code.
Let me search for `aut_authorization_types`.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "aut_authorization_types"}
Result
File: src/Controller/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController.php
Match lines: 1
43| 'authorization_types' => $view['aut_authorization_types'],
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery.php
Match lines: 3
21| * aut_authorization_types: list<string>,
33| 'aut_authorization_types' => [],
45| * aut_authorization_types: list<string>,
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigService.php
Match lines: 2
32| * aut_authorization_types: list<string>,
50| 'aut_authorization_types' => $hasConfig ? $config->getTypeLabels() : [],
File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig
Match lines: 1
34|{% for typeLabel in aut_authorization_types|default([]) %}
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig
Match lines: 1
298| var initialTypes = {{ aut_authorization_types|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
File: tests/Unit/Product/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQueryTest.php
Match lines: 2
30| self::assertSame([], $view['aut_authorization_types']);
65| self::assertSame([], $view['aut_authorization_types']);
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "governance_authorization_config_save"}
Result
File: config/routes_governance.yaml
Match lines: 1
375|governance_authorization_config_save:
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig
Match lines: 1
295| var SAVE_URL = {{ path('governance_authorization_config_save')|json_encode|raw }};
Request #92
deepseek-v4-flash
P:53.13K C:248 CR:52.61K CW:0
2764ms
Reasoning
OK, types are list<string>. Good.
Let's read the hub query and service to confirm all the variables that the templates depend on are actually provided. Particularly `aut_company_areas`, `aut_company_roles`, `allMembers`, `aut_authorization_approver_members/roles`, `aut_authorization_use_members/roles`. And whether `authorization_types` response shape matches `ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes`. Let's read the service and hub query relevant parts (out of the review files, but we can use them as context).
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery.php"}
Result
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery.php (Total lines: 77)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-77
1|<?php
2|
3|declare(strict_types=1);
4|
5|namespace App\Service\Governance;
6|
7|use App\Entity\Company;
8|use App\Entity\CompanyArea;
9|use App\Repository\CompanyAreaRepository;
10|
11|final class GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery
12|{
13| public function __construct(
14| private GovernanceAuthorizationConfigService $configService,
15| private CompanyAreaRepository $areaRepository,
16| ) {
17| }
18|
19| /**
20| * @return array{
21| * aut_authorization_types: list<string>,
22| * aut_authorization_use_members: bool,
23| * aut_authorization_use_roles: bool,
24| * aut_authorization_approver_members: list<array{id: int, name: string, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}>,
25| * aut_authorization_approver_roles: list<array{id: int, name: string, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}>,
26| * aut_company_roles: list<array{id: int, name: string}>,
27| * aut_company_areas: list<array{id: int|null, name: string}>
28| * }
29| */
30| public static function emptyView(): array
31| {
32| return [
33| 'aut_authorization_types' => [],
34| 'aut_authorization_use_members' => true,
35| 'aut_authorization_use_roles' => false,
36| 'aut_authorization_approver_members' => [],
37| 'aut_authorization_approver_roles' => [],
38| 'aut_company_roles' => [],
39| 'aut_company_areas' => [],
40| ];
41| }
42|
43| /**
44| * @return array{
45| * aut_authorization_types: list<string>,
46| * aut_authorization_use_members: bool,
47| * aut_authorization_use_roles: bool,
48| * aut_authorization_approver_members: list<array{id: int, name: string, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}>,
49| * aut_authorization_approver_roles: list<array{id: int, name: string, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}>,
50| * aut_company_roles: list<array{id: int, name: string}>,
51| * aut_company_areas: list<array{id: int|null, name: string}>
52| * }
53| */
54| public function build(?Company $company): array
55| {
56| if (!$company instanceof Company) {
57| return self::emptyView();
58| }
59|
60| $areas = [];
61| foreach ($this->areaRepository->findForCompany($company, true) as $area) {
62| if (!$area instanceof CompanyArea) {
63| continue;
64| }
65|
66| $areas[] = [
67| 'id' => $area->getId(),
68| 'name' => (string) $area->getName(),
69| ];
70| }
71|
72| return array_merge($this->configService->getViewData($company), [
73| 'aut_company_areas' => $areas,
74| ]);
75| }
76|}
77|
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "config/routes_governance.yaml", "start_line": 365, "end_line": 395}
Result
File: config/routes_governance.yaml (Total lines: 408)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 365-395
365|governance_authorization_condition_usage:
366| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/conditions/usage
367| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::authorizationConditionUsage
368| methods: [GET]
369|
370|governance_authorization_config_get:
371| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/config
372| controller: App\Controller\Governance\GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController::show
373| methods: [GET]
374|
375|governance_authorization_config_save:
376| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/config
377| controller: App\Controller\Governance\GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController::save
378| methods: [POST]
379|
380|member_governance_pendencies_index:
381| path: /user/pendencies
382| controller: App\Controller\Governance\MemberGovernancePendenciesController::index
383| methods: [GET]
384|
385|member_governance_pendencies_documents_list:
386| path: /user/pendencies/authorizations/{autId}/documents
387| controller: App\Controller\Governance\MemberGovernancePendenciesController::documentsList
388| methods: [GET]
389| requirements:
390| autId: '\d+'
391|
392|member_governance_pendencies_document_upload:
393| path: /user/pendencies/authorizations/{autId}/documents/upload
394| controller: App\Controller\Governance\MemberGovernancePendenciesController::documentUpload
395| methods: [POST]
Request #93
deepseek-v4-flash
P:54.66K C:101 CR:53.38K CW:0
1982ms
Reasoning
Let me look at GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController::save to verify whether CSRF is required, response format (authorization_types, approver_members etc.), and company isolation. This is context not in review group, but informs review of template issues.
Tool Calls (1)
file_find
Show Details
Arguments
{"query_name": "GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController.php"}
Result
src/Controller/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController.php
Request #94
deepseek-v4-flash
P:54.79K C:57 CR:54.66K CW:0
1717ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Controller/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController.php"}
Result
File: src/Controller/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController.php (Total lines: 133)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-133
1|<?php
2|
3|declare(strict_types=1);
4|
5|namespace App\Controller\Governance;
6|
7|use App\Entity\Company;
8|use App\Entity\User;
9|use App\Service\Governance\GovernanceAuthorizationConfigService;
10|use Doctrine\ORM\EntityManagerInterface;
11|use Psr\Log\LoggerInterface;
12|use Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Controller\AbstractController;
13|use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\JsonResponse;
14|use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request;
15|use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\RequestStack;
16|
17|final class GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController extends AbstractController
18|{
19| public function __construct(
20| private EntityManagerInterface $entityManager,
21| private RequestStack $requestStack,
22| private GovernanceAuthorizationConfigService $authorizationConfigService,
23| private LoggerInterface $logger,
24| ) {
25| }
26|
27| public function show(): JsonResponse
28| {
29| /** @var User|null $user */
30| $user = $this->getUser();
31| $company = $this->currentGovernanceCompany();
32| if (!$user || !$company) {
33| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Não autenticado.'], 401);
34| }
35| if (!$this->canManageAuthorizationConfig()) {
36| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Sem permissão para consultar configurações de Autorizações.'], 403);
37| }
38|
39| $view = $this->authorizationConfigService->getViewData($company);
40|
41| return new JsonResponse([
42| 'success' => true,
43| 'authorization_types' => $view['aut_authorization_types'],
44| 'use_members' => $view['aut_authorization_use_members'],
45| 'use_roles' => $view['aut_authorization_use_roles'],
46| 'approver_members' => $view['aut_authorization_approver_members'],
47| 'approver_roles' => $view['aut_authorization_approver_roles'],
48| 'company_roles' => $view['aut_company_roles'],
49| ]);
50| }
51|
52| public function save(Request $request): JsonResponse
53| {
54| /** @var User|null $user */
55| $user = $this->getUser();
56| $company = $this->currentGovernanceCompany();
57| if (!$user || !$company) {
58| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Não autenticado.'], 401);
59| }
60| if (!$this->canManageAuthorizationConfig()) {
61| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Sem permissão para alterar configurações de Autorizações.'], 403);
62| }
63|
64| $payload = json_decode($request->getContent(), true);
65| if (!is_array($payload)) {
66| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Payload inválido.'], 400);
67| }
68|
69| try {
70| $data = $this->authorizationConfigService->savePayload($company, $payload, $user);
71| } catch (\InvalidArgumentException $e) {
72| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => $e->getMessage()], 422);
73| } catch (\Throwable $e) {
74| $this->logger->error('authorizationConfigSave: ' . $e->getMessage(), ['exception' => $e]);
75|
76| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Erro ao salvar configurações.'], 500);
77| }
78|
79| return new JsonResponse([
80| 'success' => true,
81| 'message' => 'Configurações salvas.',
82| 'authorization_types' => $data['authorization_types'],
83| 'use_members' => $data['use_members'],
84| 'use_roles' => $data['use_roles'],
85| 'approver_members' => $data['approver_members'],
86| 'approver_roles' => $data['approver_roles'],
87| ]);
88| }
89|
90| private function currentGovernanceCompany(): ?Company
91| {
92| $request = $this->requestStack->getCurrentRequest();
93| $currentCompany = $request?->attributes->get('current_company');
94| if ($currentCompany instanceof Company) {
95| return $currentCompany;
96| }
97|
98| if ($request !== null && $request->hasSession()) {
99| $selectedWorkspace = (string) $request->getSession()->get('selected_workspace', '');
100| if ($selectedWorkspace !== '' && str_starts_with($selectedWorkspace, 'company_')) {
101| $companyId = (int) str_replace('company_', '', $selectedWorkspace);
102| if ($companyId > 0) {
103| $companyFromWorkspace = $this->entityManager->getRepository(Company::class)->find($companyId);
104| if ($companyFromWorkspace instanceof Company) {
105| return $companyFromWorkspace;
106| }
107| }
108| }
109| }
110|
111| /** @var User|null $user */
112| $user = $this->getUser();
113|
114| return $user ? $user->getCompany() : null;
115| }
116|
117| private function canManageAuthorizationConfig(): bool
118| {
119| if ($this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN') || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER') || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR')) {
120| return true;
121| }
122|
123| $request = $this->requestStack->getCurrentRequest();
124| if (!$request) {
125| return false;
126| }
127|
128| return (bool) $request->attributes->get('can_create', false)
129| || (bool) $request->attributes->get('can_edit', false)
130| || (bool) $request->attributes->get('can_delete', false);
131| }
132|}
133|
Request #95
deepseek-v4-flash
P:56.39K C:1.25K CR:54.78K CW:0
10022ms
Reasoning
OK, backend confirms no CSRF validation server-side (it doesn't call `$this->isCsrfTokenValid`). But the confirmed finding #5 noted absence of CSRF token — the risk stands as a security concern regardless of current backend behavior. Don't repeat.
Note: `approver_members`/`approver_roles` in the save response is the list. But the settings JS `persist()` calls `window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers(res.approver_members || payload.approver_members);` with only members — confirmed finding #3.
Note also: The response keys are `approver_members`, `approver_roles`, and JS references `res.approver_members`. So if the no-op function actually implemented sync, would need roles too. Confirmed #3.
Now, given the confirmed list, I should look for additional real issues in the diff that aren't listed.
Let me analyze deeper about company isolation etc. That's the backend (outside group). Hmm.
Let me look for a frontend bug: In settings, the approver picker for ROLES shows catalogRoles but renders rows with team filters hidden; submit works. OK.
Now consider this scenario: The settings page only rendered if ssmaCanManageConfig; the picker modal `_modal_add_approver.html.twig` is included inside the settings tab, i.e., inside the hidden tab panel if defaultAutTab is another tab. Then index hoists it to body (once). When user clicks "Adicionar membros", openApproverPicker calls `$('#govAuthAddApproverModal').modal('show')`. Since the modal was moved to body, good. But if hoist fails (script runs before content exists?), the modal remains inside tab panel that may be display:none. The hoist script is in `{% block javascripts %}` presumably at the end of body and content includes rendered before. Good.
But an important subtlety: `.modal('show')` with bootstrap requires modal to not be nested in a hidden container. hoist handles.
Now consider duplicate IDs: settings tab content has an element `govAuthApproverMembersOption` etc. If the settings tab is re-rendered... not happening.
Another candidate bug I noticed: In the settings JS persist, `authorization_types: currentTypes()` reading chips labels from DOM. However, area keys are labels; duplicates removed.
Now consider `collectPayload` when use_roles false but roles present in list: They'd still send approver_roles but with use_roles false; backend may ignore. OK.
Now there is a potential mismatch between "company roles" list provided to picker (aut_company_roles), but approver roles hydration from saved list (aut_authorization_approver_roles). When a role has been deactivated in company since assignment, name fallback 'Cargo #id'. OK.
Now, let's check whether the settings' filters are computed from catalogMembers (all members), but if members list is huge (company members can be tens of thousands), rendering thousands of rows in the modal at open (renderPickerRows iterates and builds DOM for every member) could be slow. That's performance. In big companies, `allMembers` may be thousands; building a DOM row for each is O(n) with hundreds of thousands nodes? Might cause lag on open. But not enough evidence.
Also this catalog is dumped in the HTML as JSON: `var catalogMembers = {{ allMembers|default([])|json_encode|raw }};` serializing all members (id, name, email, position, team_names, employment_bond) onto the page, sent to any user who can manage config (which per controller is super admin, manager, gestor or can_create/can_edit/can_delete). Those are privileged anyway. But wait, this data also loaded in index page for every manager with ssmaCanManageConfig on this page even if they never open settings. Potential big payload but privileged.
Actually there's a serious data-scope concern: The picker modal includes all members with emails. It's shown to config managers. OK.
Now let me check the create template's AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS usage more carefully because this could hide a bug:
`AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS` = ['autCriarArea', 'autCriarResponsavel', 'autCriarAprovador', 'autCriarAprovadorRole', 'autCriarTipo'].
In `$(document).on('click', '#btnSalvarAdicionarAut', function () { ... AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS.forEach(syncAutCriarSelectFromCustomUi); ... })`.
`syncAutCriarSelectFromCustomUi(selectId)` is called with forEach args (value,index,array) — extra args ignored. OK.
Note: For custom select UI elements, the select triggers sync so that the underlying native select receives UI selection. But the native select `autCriarAprovador` etc. are also populated in options. Their value might already be set via setAutCriarCustomSelectValueSilent. Fine.
Now let me check `setAutCriarCustomSelectValueSilent` function to understand whether it works with autCriarTipo etc. Let me read around lines 1300-1400 in create template to look at functions and look for any bug in new usage.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 1420, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig", "start_line": 1302}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig (Total lines: 2423)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1302-1420
1302| function setAutCriarCustomSelectValueSilent(selectId, value) {
1303| var cleanId = String(selectId || '').replace(/^#/, '');
1304| if (!cleanId) {
1305| return;
1306| }
1307| var el = document.getElementById(cleanId);
1308| if (!el) {
1309| return;
1310| }
1311| var normalized = value == null ? '' : String(value);
1312| el.value = normalized;
1313|
1314| var wrapper = el.closest('.custom-modern-select-wrapper');
1315| if (!wrapper) {
1316| return;
1317| }
1318| var opt = el.options[el.selectedIndex];
1319| var text = opt ? opt.text : '';
1320| var span = wrapper.querySelector('.custom-modern-select-label');
1321| if (span) {
1322| span.textContent = text;
1323| }
1324| wrapper.querySelectorAll('.custom-modern-option').forEach(function (optionNode) {
1325| var isSelected = String(optionNode.getAttribute('data-value')) === normalized;
1326| optionNode.classList.toggle('selected', isSelected);
1327| optionNode.classList.toggle('is-selected', isSelected);
1328| });
1329| }
1330|
1331| function resetAutCriarCustomSelect($selectId, placeholderValue) {
1332| setAutCriarCustomSelectValueSilent($selectId, placeholderValue || '');
1333| }
1334|
1335| function initAutCriarTagSelect(config) {
1336| var shared = window.SsmaShared || {};
1337| if (!config || typeof shared.bindTagSelect !== 'function' || !config.$select.length) {
1338| return;
1339| }
1340| if (!config.initialHtml) {
1341| config.initialHtml = config.$select.html();
1342| }
1343| if (!config._bound) {
1344| shared.bindTagSelect(config);
1345| config.$select.on('change.autCriarReqSync', function () {
1346| if (config._syncBusy) {
1347| return;
1348| }
1349| config._syncBusy = true;
1350| try {
1351| syncAutCriarCustomSelectOptions($(this));
1352| resetAutCriarCustomSelect(config.selectId, '');
1353| updateAutCriarTagSelectCountLabel(config);
1354| } finally {
1355| config._syncBusy = false;
1356| }
1357| });
1358| $(document).on('click.autCriarReqSync.' + config.removeClass, '.' + config.removeClass + '-remove', function () {
1359| setTimeout(function () {
1360| syncAutCriarCustomSelectOptions(config.$select);
1361| updateAutCriarTagSelectCountLabel(config);
1362| }, 0);
1363| });
1364| config._bound = true;
1365| }
1366| }
1367|
1368| function initAutCriarReqTagSelect() {
1369| initAutCriarTagSelect(AUT_REQ_TAG_CONFIG);
1370| }
1371|
1372| function initAutCriarContractorReqTagSelect() {
1373| initAutCriarTagSelect(AUT_CONTRACTOR_REQ_TAG_CONFIG);
1374| }
1375|
1376| function resetAutCriarTagSelect(config) {
1377| var shared = window.SsmaShared || {};
1378| if (typeof shared.resetTagSelect === 'function') {
1379| shared.resetTagSelect(config);
1380| } else {
1381| config.$tags.empty();
1382| if (config.initialHtml) {
1383| config.$select.html(config.initialHtml);
1384| }
1385| config.$select.val('');
1386| }
1387| syncAutCriarCustomSelectOptions(config.$select);
1388| resetAutCriarCustomSelect(config.selectId, '');
1389| updateAutCriarTagSelectCountLabel(config);
1390| }
1391|
1392| function resetAutCriarReqTags() {
1393| resetAutCriarTagSelect(AUT_REQ_TAG_CONFIG);
1394| }
1395|
1396| function resetAutCriarContractorReqTags() {
1397| resetAutCriarTagSelect(AUT_CONTRACTOR_REQ_TAG_CONFIG);
1398| }
1399|
1400| function setAutCriarTagValues(config, values) {
1401| var shared = window.SsmaShared || {};
1402| initAutCriarTagSelect(config);
1403| if (typeof shared.setTagSelectValues === 'function') {
1404| shared.setTagSelectValues(config, (values || []).map(function (value) { return String(value); }));
1405| }
1406| syncAutCriarCustomSelectOptions(config.$select);
1407| resetAutCriarCustomSelect(config.selectId, '');
1408| updateAutCriarTagSelectCountLabel(config);
1409| }
1410|
1411| function setAutCriarReqTags(values) {
1412| setAutCriarTagValues(AUT_REQ_TAG_CONFIG, values);
1413| }
1414|
1415| function setAutCriarContractorReqTags(values) {
1416| setAutCriarTagValues(AUT_CONTRACTOR_REQ_TAG_CONFIG, values);
1417| }
1418|
1419|
1420| var autTableInstance = null;
Request #96
deepseek-v4-flash
P:59.03K C:998 CR:57.6K CW:0
9302ms
Reasoning
Interesting: `setAutCriarCustomSelectValueSilent` sets `el.value = normalized` but it relies on the native `<select>` options containing a matching value; if not present (e.g., no matching option), selectedIndex would be -1; it toggles no .selected option, and label span text uses opt.text if option exists; else text '' leaves the label empty. So for stale values after `ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes` resetting current value removed, fine.
Now consider a subtle bug in `applyAutCriarModalFields` regarding aprovador select: the option value is member.id (an integer). areaId = aut.area_id etc. Types string.
Consider edit of an authorization with tipo that equals ''? For older authorizations tipo null → reset to empty string. OK.
Potential bug: `setAutCriarSelectValue('autCriarArea', areaId)` uses `resetAutCriarCustomSelect(selectId, '')` when empty. But `resetAutCriarCustomSelect` is just alias. OK.
Now consider when modal opens "view" for a record where responsavel is a member; if member not in list, the custom select options list doesn't contain that value so nothing selected; label span stays old? On a fresh open reset sets '' so blank label. Actually there was pre-existing function `resolveAutCriarResponsavelId` and ensure? For responsavel there was possibly a function to fill with option when not found? Let me look at old code around lines 1680-1700. Hmm.
Actually the pre-existing code path set responsavel via `setAutCriarResponsavelValue(responsavelVal)` = `setAutCriarCustomSelectValueSilent`, but there was possibly an `ensure` for responsavel? Not sure. This pre-existing behavior unchanged.
But new code calls `ensureAutCriarSelectOption` for Area, Tipo, Aprovador, Cargo roles but NOT for Responsavel when the saved responsavel isn't in the initial options list. Could be that `autCriarResponsavel`'s option list previously got filled with any resp from the list `autCriarResponsavelOptions` including only members? Actually options list from allMembers? Wait pre-existing options for responsavel include all members? Maybe allMembers. Not an issue if list allMembers.
Alright.
Now let me consider one more potential real bug: In settings file, when `aut_authorization_use_roles` is false initially but `aut_authorization_approver_roles` have items, `govAuthUseRoles=false`, and roles wrap hidden, but approverList still includes role rows (since hydrateAssignments roles runs regardless). But when members option is on (default true), member rows shown. Role rows remain in the approverList even though roles flag off. Wait approver list contains role rows if initialApproverRoles has items, even if use_roles false? Possibly yes: a previously configured role approver but user unchecked "Cargos" flag; the saved config presumably keeps the approver list but flag off. When the flag is off, should role rows be hidden? Let's examine markup: `govAuthApproverRolesWrap` hidden; but rows in `govAuthApproverList` aren't wrapped by type, so role rows would still display in the approver list below, even with Cargos off and Members on. Then when saved again (e.g., adding a member), `collectApproverAssignments('role')` will re-send roles with use_roles false. If the backend simply persists all role rows regardless of use_roles flag, then toggling Cargos off and saving would keep roles but flag off; re-enabling later restores. Depends on backend semantics — maybe intentional to preserve hidden rows. But visually confusing: roles shown even when disabled. Given confirmed list only covers specific; this could be a UI logic gap. But this is speculative regarding intended UX; backend semantics may define. Might be too speculative.
Also on load, use_roles false and approver_roles with entries would result in roles rows being visible under the approver list despite role disabled — indeed hydration renders all role rows. But wait, does backend persist rows for disabled type? savePayload presumably stores roles regardless? Let's look at GovernanceAuthorizationConfigService savePayload to understand semantics (whether use_roles false deletes roles?).
Let me read the service quickly to confirm.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigService.php"}
Result
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigService.php (Total lines: 631)
IS_TRUNCATED: true
LINE_RANGE: 1-500
1|<?php
2|
3|declare(strict_types=1);
4|
5|namespace App\Service\Governance;
6|
7|use App\Entity\Company;
8|use App\Entity\CompanyMembers;
9|use App\Entity\GovernanceAuthorizationApprover;
10|use App\Entity\GovernanceAuthorizationConfig;
11|use App\Entity\GovernanceAuthorizationType;
12|use App\Entity\Roles;
13|use App\Entity\User;
14|use App\Repository\GovernanceAuthorizationConfigRepository;
15|use App\Repository\GovernanceCaseHistoryRepository;
16|use Doctrine\ORM\EntityManagerInterface;
17|
18|final class GovernanceAuthorizationConfigService
19|{
20| private const MAX_TYPE_LENGTH = 80;
21| private const MAX_TYPES = 100;
22| private const MAX_APPROVER_IDS = 200;
23|
24| public function __construct(
25| private EntityManagerInterface $em,
26| private GovernanceAuthorizationConfigRepository $repository,
27| ) {
28| }
29|
30| /**
31| * @return array{
32| * aut_authorization_types: list<string>,
33| * aut_authorization_use_members: bool,
34| * aut_authorization_use_roles: bool,
35| * aut_authorization_approver_members: list<array{id: int, name: string, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}>,
36| * aut_authorization_approver_roles: list<array{id: int, name: string, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}>,
37| * aut_company_roles: list<array{id: int, name: string}>
38| * }
39| */
40| public function getViewData(Company $company): array
41| {
42| $config = $this->repository->findOneByCompany($company);
43| $hasConfig = $config instanceof GovernanceAuthorizationConfig;
44| [$useMembers, $useRoles] = $this->resolveUseFlags(
45| $hasConfig ? $config->usesMembers() : true,
46| $hasConfig ? $config->usesRoles() : false,
47| );
48|
49| return [
50| 'aut_authorization_types' => $hasConfig ? $config->getTypeLabels() : [],
51| 'aut_authorization_use_members' => $useMembers,
52| 'aut_authorization_use_roles' => $useRoles,
53| 'aut_authorization_approver_members' => $hasConfig ? $this->mapApprovers($config->getMemberApprovers(), 'member') : [],
54| 'aut_authorization_approver_roles' => $hasConfig ? $this->mapApprovers($config->getRoleApprovers(), 'role') : [],
55| 'aut_company_roles' => $this->listCompanyRoles($company),
56| ];
57| }
58|
59| /**
60| * @param array<string, mixed> $payload
61| *
62| * @return array{
63| * authorization_types: list<string>,
64| * use_members: bool,
65| * use_roles: bool,
66| * approver_members: list<array{id: int, name: string, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}>,
67| * approver_roles: list<array{id: int, name: string, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}>
68| * }
69| */
70| public function savePayload(Company $company, array $payload, ?User $user = null): array
71| {
72| $typeLabels = $this->normalizeTypes($payload['authorization_types'] ?? []);
73| [$useMembers, $useRoles] = $this->resolveUseFlags(
74| $this->normalizeBoolean($payload['use_members'] ?? true, 'use_members'),
75| $this->normalizeBoolean($payload['use_roles'] ?? false, 'use_roles'),
76| );
77|
78| $memberAssignments = $this->normalizeApproverPayload(
79| $payload['approver_members'] ?? [],
80| $typeLabels,
81| 'approver_members'
82| );
83| $roleAssignments = $this->normalizeApproverPayload(
84| $payload['approver_roles'] ?? [],
85| $typeLabels,
86| 'approver_roles'
87| );
88|
89| $this->assertMembersBelongToCompany($company, array_column($memberAssignments, 'id'));
90| $this->assertRolesBelongToCompany($company, array_column($roleAssignments, 'id'));
91|
92| $config = $this->findOrCreate($company, $user);
93| $config
94| ->setUseMembers($useMembers)
95| ->setUseRoles($useRoles)
96| ->setUpdatedBy($user);
97|
98| $config->clearApprovers();
99| $typesByKey = $this->syncTypes($config, $typeLabels);
100| $this->syncApprovers($config, $company, $memberAssignments, $roleAssignments, $typesByKey);
101|
102| $this->repository->save($config);
103|
104| return [
105| 'authorization_types' => $config->getTypeLabels(),
106| 'use_members' => $config->usesMembers(),
107| 'use_roles' => $config->usesRoles(),
108| 'approver_members' => $this->mapApprovers($config->getMemberApprovers(), 'member'),
109| 'approver_roles' => $this->mapApprovers($config->getRoleApprovers(), 'role'),
110| ];
111| }
112|
113| public function resolveTypeLabel(Company $company, string $tipo): ?string
114| {
115| $needle = mb_strtolower(trim($tipo));
116| if ($needle === '') {
117| return null;
118| }
119|
120| $config = $this->repository->findOneByCompany($company);
121| if (!$config instanceof GovernanceAuthorizationConfig) {
122| return null;
123| }
124|
125| foreach ($config->getTypeLabels() as $label) {
126| if (mb_strtolower($label) === $needle) {
127| return $label;
128| }
129| }
130|
131| return null;
132| }
133|
134| public function hasConfiguredTypes(Company $company): bool
135| {
136| $config = $this->repository->findOneByCompany($company);
137|
138| return $config instanceof GovernanceAuthorizationConfig
139| && $config->getTypeLabels() !== [];
140| }
141|
142| private function findOrCreate(Company $company, ?User $user): GovernanceAuthorizationConfig
143| {
144| $config = $this->repository->findOneByCompany($company);
145| if ($config instanceof GovernanceAuthorizationConfig) {
146| return $config;
147| }
148|
149| $config = new GovernanceAuthorizationConfig();
150| $config->setCompany($company);
151| if ($user instanceof User) {
152| $config->setCreatedBy($user);
153| }
154|
155| return $config;
156| }
157|
158| /**
159| * @param list<string> $labels
160| *
161| * @return array<string, GovernanceAuthorizationType>
162| */
163| private function syncTypes(GovernanceAuthorizationConfig $config, array $labels): array
164| {
165| $kept = [];
166| $byKey = [];
167| foreach ($config->getTypes() as $type) {
168| $byKey[mb_strtolower($type->getLabel())] = $type;
169| }
170|
171| foreach ($labels as $position => $label) {
172| $key = mb_strtolower($label);
173| $type = $byKey[$key] ?? null;
174| if (!$type instanceof GovernanceAuthorizationType) {
175| $type = new GovernanceAuthorizationType();
176| $config->addType($type);
177| }
178| $type->setLabel($label)->setPosition($position);
179| $kept[] = $type;
180| }
181|
182| foreach ($config->getTypes()->toArray() as $type) {
183| if (!in_array($type, $kept, true)) {
184| $config->removeType($type);
185| }
186| }
187|
188| $map = [];
189| foreach ($kept as $type) {
190| $map[mb_strtolower($type->getLabel())] = $type;
191| }
192|
193| return $map;
194| }
195|
196| /**
197| * @param list<array{id: int, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}> $memberAssignments
198| * @param list<array{id: int, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}> $roleAssignments
199| * @param array<string, GovernanceAuthorizationType> $typesByKey
200| */
201| private function syncApprovers(
202| GovernanceAuthorizationConfig $config,
203| Company $company,
204| array $memberAssignments,
205| array $roleAssignments,
206| array $typesByKey,
207| ): void {
208| $position = 0;
209|
210| foreach ($memberAssignments as $assignment) {
211| $member = $this->findUsableMember($company, $assignment['id']);
212| if (!$member instanceof CompanyMembers) {
213| continue;
214| }
215|
216| $config->addApprover($this->buildApprover($member, null, $assignment, $typesByKey, $position));
217| ++$position;
218| }
219|
220| foreach ($roleAssignments as $assignment) {
221| $role = $this->findUsableRole($company, $assignment['id']);
222| if (!$role instanceof Roles) {
223| continue;
224| }
225|
226| $config->addApprover($this->buildApprover(null, $role, $assignment, $typesByKey, $position));
227| ++$position;
228| }
229| }
230|
231| /**
232| * @param array{id: int, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>} $assignment
233| * @param array<string, GovernanceAuthorizationType> $typesByKey
234| */
235| private function buildApprover(
236| ?CompanyMembers $member,
237| ?Roles $role,
238| array $assignment,
239| array $typesByKey,
240| int $position,
241| ): GovernanceAuthorizationApprover {
242| $approver = new GovernanceAuthorizationApprover();
243| $approver
244| ->setMember($member)
245| ->setRole($role)
246| ->setPosition($position);
247|
248| $allAreas = !empty($assignment['all_areas']);
249| if ($allAreas) {
250| $approver->setAllAreas(true);
251|
252| return $approver;
253| }
254|
255| $areaKeys = $assignment['area_keys'] ?? [];
256| if ($areaKeys === []) {
257| throw new \InvalidArgumentException(
258| 'Informe ao menos um tipo de autorização para o aprovador com escopo restrito.'
259| );
260| }
261|
262| $approver->setAllAreas(false);
263| foreach ($areaKeys as $label) {
264| $type = $typesByKey[mb_strtolower($label)] ?? null;
265| if (!$type instanceof GovernanceAuthorizationType) {
266| throw new \InvalidArgumentException(sprintf(
267| 'Tipo de autorização desconhecido: %s.',
268| $label
269| ));
270| }
271| $approver->addApplicationType($type);
272| }
273|
274| return $approver;
275| }
276|
277| /**
278| * @param list<GovernanceAuthorizationApprover> $approvers
279| *
280| * @return list<array{id: int, name: string, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}>
281| */
282| private function mapApprovers(array $approvers, string $kind): array
283| {
284| $rows = [];
285| foreach ($approvers as $approver) {
286| if ($kind === 'member') {
287| $subject = $approver->getMember();
288| if (!$subject instanceof CompanyMembers || $subject->getIsRemoved()) {
289| continue;
290| }
291| $name = trim(GovernanceCaseHistoryRepository::resolveMemberDisplayName($subject));
292| $fallback = 'Membro #' . $subject->getId();
293| } else {
294| $subject = $approver->getRole();
295| if (!$subject instanceof Roles || $subject->getIsRemoved()) {
296| continue;
297| }
298| $name = trim((string) $subject->getName());
299| $fallback = 'Cargo #' . $subject->getId();
300| }
301|
302| $rows[] = [
303| 'id' => (int) $subject->getId(),
304| 'name' => $name !== '' ? $name : $fallback,
305| 'all_areas' => $approver->usesAllAreas(),
306| 'area_keys' => $approver->getApplicationTypeLabels(),
307| ];
308| }
309|
310| return $rows;
311| }
312|
313| /**
314| * @param mixed $raw
315| *
316| * @return list<string>
317| */
318| private function normalizeTypes(mixed $raw): array
319| {
320| if (!is_array($raw)) {
321| throw new \InvalidArgumentException('Tipos de autorização inválidos.');
322| }
323|
324| $normalized = [];
325| $seen = [];
326|
327| foreach ($raw as $item) {
328| if (!is_string($item) && !is_numeric($item)) {
329| throw new \InvalidArgumentException('Tipos de autorização inválidos.');
330| }
331|
332| $label = trim((string) $item);
333| if ($label === '') {
334| continue;
335| }
336|
337| if (mb_strlen($label) > self::MAX_TYPE_LENGTH) {
338| throw new \InvalidArgumentException(sprintf(
339| 'Tipo de autorização deve ter no máximo %d caracteres.',
340| self::MAX_TYPE_LENGTH
341| ));
342| }
343|
344| $key = mb_strtolower($label);
345| if (isset($seen[$key])) {
346| continue;
347| }
348|
349| $seen[$key] = true;
350| $normalized[] = $label;
351|
352| if (count($normalized) > self::MAX_TYPES) {
353| throw new \InvalidArgumentException(sprintf(
354| 'É permitido cadastrar no máximo %d tipos de autorização.',
355| self::MAX_TYPES
356| ));
357| }
358| }
359|
360| return $normalized;
361| }
362|
363| /**
364| * @param list<int> $memberIds
365| */
366| private function assertMembersBelongToCompany(Company $company, array $memberIds): void
367| {
368| foreach ($memberIds as $memberId) {
369| if (!$this->findUsableMember($company, $memberId) instanceof CompanyMembers) {
370| throw new \InvalidArgumentException('Membro aprovador inválido.');
371| }
372| }
373| }
374|
375| /**
376| * @param list<int> $roleIds
377| */
378| private function assertRolesBelongToCompany(Company $company, array $roleIds): void
379| {
380| foreach ($roleIds as $roleId) {
381| if (!$this->findUsableRole($company, $roleId) instanceof Roles) {
382| throw new \InvalidArgumentException('Cargo aprovador inválido.');
383| }
384| }
385| }
386|
387| private function findUsableMember(Company $company, int $memberId): ?CompanyMembers
388| {
389| $member = $this->em->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->findOneBy([
390| 'id' => $memberId,
391| 'company' => $company,
392| 'isRemoved' => 0,
393| ]);
394|
395| return $member instanceof CompanyMembers ? $member : null;
396| }
397|
398| private function findUsableRole(Company $company, int $roleId): ?Roles
399| {
400| $role = $this->em->getRepository(Roles::class)->find($roleId);
401| if (
402| !$role instanceof Roles
403| || $role->getCompany()?->getId() !== $company->getId()
404| || $role->getIsRemoved()
405| ) {
406| return null;
407| }
408|
409| return $role;
410| }
411|
412| /**
413| * @return array{0: bool, 1: bool}
414| */
415| private function resolveUseFlags(bool $useMembers, bool $useRoles): array
416| {
417| if (!$useMembers && !$useRoles) {
418| $useMembers = true;
419| }
420|
421| return [$useMembers, $useRoles];
422| }
423|
424| /**
425| * @param mixed $raw
426| * @param list<string> $types
427| *
428| * @return list<array{id: int, all_areas: bool, area_keys: list<string>}>
429| */
430| private function normalizeApproverPayload(mixed $raw, array $types, string $field): array
431| {
432| if (!is_array($raw)) {
433| throw new \InvalidArgumentException(sprintf('Lista inválida: %s.', $field));
434| }
435|
436| $canonicalTypes = [];
437| foreach ($types as $label) {
438| $canonicalTypes[mb_strtolower($label)] = $label;
439| }
440|
441| $normalized = [];
442| $seen = [];
443|
444| foreach ($raw as $item) {
445| $allAreas = true;
446| $areaKeys = [];
447|
448| if (is_array($item)) {
449| $id = $this->parsePositiveId($item['id'] ?? null, $field);
450| $allAreasSpecified = array_key_exists('all_areas', $item);
451| if ($allAreasSpecified) {
452| $allAreas = $this->normalizeBoolean($item['all_areas'], 'all_areas');
453| }
454| $areaKeys = $this->filterAreaKeys(
455| array_key_exists('area_keys', $item) ? $item['area_keys'] : [],
456| $canonicalTypes,
457| $field
458| );
459| if (!$allAreasSpecified && $areaKeys !== []) {
460| $allAreas = false;
461| }
462| } else {
463| $id = $this->parsePositiveId($item, $field);
464| }
465|
466| if (isset($seen[$id])) {
467| throw new \InvalidArgumentException(sprintf('Identificador duplicado em %s.', $field));
468| }
469|
470| if (!$allAreas && $areaKeys === []) {
471| throw new \InvalidArgumentException(sprintf(
472| 'Informe ao menos um tipo de autorização quando all_areas=false em %s.',
473| $field
474| ));
475| }
476|
477| if ($allAreas) {
478| $areaKeys = [];
479| }
480|
481| $seen[$id] = true;
482| $normalized[] = [
483| 'id' => $id,
484| 'all_areas' => $allAreas,
485| 'area_keys' => $areaKeys,
486| ];
487|
488| if (count($normalized) > self::MAX_APPROVER_IDS) {
489| throw new \InvalidArgumentException(sprintf(
490| 'É permitido cadastrar no máximo %d aprovadores em %s.',
491| self::MAX_APPROVER_IDS,
492| $field
493| ));
494| }
495| }
496|
497| return $normalized;
498| }
499|
500| /**
Note: Results truncated to 500 lines. Please narrow your line range.
Request #97
deepseek-v4-flash
P:65.03K C:837 CR:59.9K CW:0
7654ms
Reasoning
Let me think about backend implications for front-end logic which may expose bugs:
- `savePayload` normalizes types & approvers, and `syncApprovers` clears approvers and rebuilds both member & role assignments from the payload, regardless of use flags. So if a role row is present in DOM (role rows are always in approverList regardless of flag), and flag disabled, sending role rows still persists them with use_roles false. OK.
- Important bug potential: **Role rows remain visible even when the roles flag is off**, and since the list shows both, a manager might see role rows under "Membros" section when roles flag off... Actually there's no clear grouping header in the list; rows have person chip; the approver list contains mixed member & role rows. This could be confusing but maybe acceptable.
Let's review deeper potential issue in the settings JS: `syncApproverMode` re-enables members only in DOM, but when user unchecks both and immediately navigates away before debounced save, the backend would never see them both off, so backend remains fine; the client re-checked Members. Confirmed #6 covers lost changes on navigation.
Actually wait — there's a REAL logical bug regarding toggling: If a user unchecks Members (leaving Roles checked) and then unchecks Roles too, the DOM force-rechecks Members. But there's no other issue.
However the more subtle UI semantics mismatch: When user unchecks the "Cargos" flag, the approver list still shows role rows and the payload still includes them. If re-enable roles later the roles come back. This is actually consistent with backend keeping rows while the flag off. But from a business/UI standpoint, roles disabled means roles can't approve; the rows persist but won't be used. In hydration, rows for a disabled flag would also appear, which contradicts "Desligar os dois flags de aprovador" test result expectation "Membros deve permanecer ativo após o save." So they at least want flags handled. Fine.
Let me not go down this speculative path.
Now, let me look for issues in the actual <style> blocks and markup, and especially any missing escape/sanitization in the newly added Twig loops for options in `_modal_authorization_form.html.twig` (name fields). Member.name is likely escaped by Twig autoescape in attribute text. In options 'text': member.name|default('') within include; autoescape true? In Twig include with array param, template engine output context autoescape applies. OK.
Now let's read `_custom_select.html.twig` to check how options are rendered and whether the `options` and `selected_value` are used to render the select in a way that duplicates or renders hidden `name`. Because the modal form now passes `name: 'autCriarArea'` etc. If a native select with the same `name` gets created as hidden element and value read from it, and two fields share same name? No duplicates. But is there also `id: 'autCriarResponsavel'`? Existing code had name autCriarResponsavel. The JS reads `.val()` of elements by id. Actually `readAutCriarSelectValue` reads `$('#' + selectId).val()`.
One risk: There might be both a native `<select id=autCriarArea>` hidden and a span UI. But `.val()` on a `<select>` works. However the custom select UI might render the native select hidden but the function to sync reads `.custom-modern-option.is-selected`... This pattern presumably works for responsavel; OK.
Let me read the custom select component quickly for selected_value handling and disabled readOnly.
Tool Calls (1)
file_find
Show Details
Arguments
{"query_name": "templates/components/ui/_custom_select.html.twig"}
Result
templates/components/ui/_custom_select.html.twig
Request #98
deepseek-v4-flash
P:65.89K C:54 CR:65.79K CW:0
1675ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "templates/components/ui/_custom_select.html.twig"}
Result
File: templates/components/ui/_custom_select.html.twig (Total lines: 123)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-123
1|{# templates/components/ui/_custom_select.html.twig #}
2|{#
3| Custom select component.
4|
5| Styles are loaded from:
6| - public/css/metahuman-standard/features/header-actions.css
7| - public/css/metahuman-standard/components/_custom_select.css
8| - public/css/metahuman-standard/features/new-buttons.css
9|
10| JavaScript is loaded from:
11| - public/js/metahuman-standard/components/_custom_select.js
12|
13| Optional:
14| - title: tooltip text on hover
15| - sortable: when true, enables asc/desc/clear cycle on label click (chevron still opens menu)
16|#}
17|
18|{% set _cs_sortable = sortable|default(false) %}
19|{% set _cs_label = label|default('Select an option') %}
20|{% set _cs_loading_enabled = loading_enabled|default(false) %}
21|{% set _cs_loading_text = loading_text|default('Carregando') %}
22|{% if selected_value is defined and selected_value is not empty %}
23| {% for option in options %}
24| {% if option.value == selected_value %}{% set _cs_label = option.text %}{% endif %}
25| {% endfor %}
26|{% endif %}
27|
28|<div class="custom-modern-select-wrapper"
29| data-loading-enabled="{{ _cs_loading_enabled ? '1' : '0' }}"
30| data-loading-text="{{ _cs_loading_text }}"
31| {% if _cs_sortable %}data-sortable="true" data-placeholder-label="{{ _cs_label }}"{% endif %}
32| {% if title is defined and title %} title="{{ title }}"{% endif %}>
33| <div class="custom-modern-select">
34| <button type="button" class="select-btn custom-modern-select-trigger">
35| {% if _cs_sortable %}
36| <span class="custom-modern-select-label-group">
37| <span class="custom-modern-select-label">{{ _cs_label }}</span>
38| <span class="custom-modern-select-direction" aria-hidden="true" style="display: none;"></span>
39| </span>
40| {% else %}
41| <span class="custom-modern-select-label">{{ _cs_label }}</span>
42| {% endif %}
43| {% if _cs_loading_enabled %}
44| <span class="custom-modern-select-loading" aria-hidden="true" style="display:none;">
45| <i class="fas fa-spinner fa-spin"></i>
46| <em>{{ _cs_loading_text }}</em>
47| </span>
48| {% endif %}
49| <i class="fas fa-chevron-down custom-modern-select-chevron custom-modern-select-icon"></i>
50| </button>
51| <div class="custom-modern-options">
52| {% for option in options %}
53| <div class="custom-modern-option{% if selected_value is defined and option.value == selected_value %} selected{% endif %}" data-value="{{ option.value }}">{{ option.text }}</div>
54| {% endfor %}
55| </div>
56| </div>
57| <select name="{{ name }}" id="{{ id }}" class="custom-modern-select-hidden" style="display:none;">
58| {% for option in options %}
59| <option value="{{ option.value }}"{% if selected_value is defined and option.value == selected_value %} selected{% endif %}>{{ option.text }}</option>
60| {% endfor %}
61| </select>
62|</div>
63|
64|<script>
65|(function () {
66| window.initAllCustomSelectWrappers = function () {
67| if (typeof window.initCustomSelects === 'function') {
68| window.initCustomSelects();
69| }
70| };
71|
72| /**
73| * Toggles the optional loading state for a _custom_select instance.
74| * @param {string} id - Native hidden select ID (without #)
75| * @param {boolean} isLoading - Whether the select should show loading UI
76| * @param {string} [text] - Optional loading label override
77| */
78| window.setCustomSelectLoading = function (id, isLoading, text) {
79| var el = document.getElementById(id);
80| if (!el) { return; }
81| var wrapper = el.closest('.custom-modern-select-wrapper');
82| if (!wrapper || wrapper.getAttribute('data-loading-enabled') !== '1') { return; }
83|
84| var trigger = wrapper.querySelector('.custom-modern-select-trigger');
85| var customSelect = wrapper.querySelector('.custom-modern-select');
86| var loadingText = wrapper.querySelector('.custom-modern-select-loading em');
87|
88| if (loadingText && text) {
89| loadingText.textContent = text;
90| } else if (loadingText) {
91| loadingText.textContent = wrapper.getAttribute('data-loading-text') || 'Carregando';
92| }
93|
94| wrapper.classList.toggle('is-loading', !!isLoading);
95|
96| /* Garantia via inline-style: o display:none no CSS pode ser sobrescrito por outras
97| regras; aqui usamos style direto para ser sempre determinístico. */
98| var loadingSpan = wrapper.querySelector('.custom-modern-select-loading');
99| var labelSpan = wrapper.querySelector('.custom-modern-select-label');
100| var chevronEl = wrapper.querySelector('.custom-modern-select-chevron');
101| if (loadingSpan) { loadingSpan.style.display = isLoading ? 'inline-flex' : 'none'; }
102| if (labelSpan) { labelSpan.style.display = isLoading ? 'none' : ''; }
103| if (chevronEl) { chevronEl.style.display = isLoading ? 'none' : ''; }
104|
105| if (customSelect) {
106| customSelect.classList.remove('open');
107| }
108| if (trigger) {
109| trigger.disabled = !!isLoading;
110| if (isLoading) {
111| trigger.setAttribute('aria-busy', 'true');
112| } else {
113| trigger.removeAttribute('aria-busy');
114| }
115| }
116|
117| if (!isLoading && typeof window.setCustomSelectValue === 'function') {
118| window.setCustomSelectValue(id, el.value);
119| }
120| };
121|}());
122|</script>
123|
Request #99
deepseek-v4-flash
P:67.5K C:369 CR:65.92K CW:0
4042ms
Reasoning
The hidden select `name` attribute: In the modal form, they pass `name: 'autCriarArea'` etc, so native select name = autCriarArea. Existing responsavel select probably name autCriarResponsavel.
One problem: `_custom_select` renders an inline `<script>` tag every time it's included (once per select). With many custom selects (5 selects), multiple scripts duplicated — pre-existing pattern. OK.
A note: Because the hidden select has `style="display:none"` and class `custom-modern-select-hidden`. When setting `.prop('disabled', readonly)`, disabling select hides? Fine.
Now consider duplication in `hoist` adding the modal to body while the modal embed includes `<style>` inside the same partial that's inside settings tab. When modal is moved to body, only the modal element moved, not the style element (style is outside modal element). The style remains in the tab (display none tab but still in DOM; styles apply regardless of DOM visibility). OK.
Now let's read the modal embed footer area of `_modal_authorization_form.html.twig` to understand `footer_justify_content: 'space-between'` effect: maybe there is a footer with left button? Let me read lines around 60-80.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 100, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig", "start_line": 1}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig (Total lines: 430)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-100
1|{% set aut_modal_responsavel_options = [{'value': '', 'text': 'Selecionar responsável'}] %}
2|{% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
3| {% set aut_modal_responsavel_options = aut_modal_responsavel_options|merge([{
4| 'value': member.id,
5| 'text': member.name|default('')
6| }]) %}
7|{% endfor %}
8|
9|{% set aut_modal_aprovador_options = [{'value': '', 'text': 'Selecionar o aprovador'}] %}
10|{% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
11| {% set aut_modal_aprovador_options = aut_modal_aprovador_options|merge([{
12| 'value': member.id,
13| 'text': member.name|default('')
14| }]) %}
15|{% endfor %}
16|
17|{% set aut_modal_aprovador_role_options = [{'value': '', 'text': 'Selecionar o cargo'}] %}
18|{% for role in aut_company_roles|default([]) %}
19| {% set aut_modal_aprovador_role_options = aut_modal_aprovador_role_options|merge([{
20| 'value': role.id,
21| 'text': role.name|default('')
22| }]) %}
23|{% endfor %}
24|
25|{% set aut_modal_area_options = [{'value': '', 'text': 'Selecionar a área'}] %}
26|{% for area in aut_company_areas|default([]) %}
27| {% set aut_modal_area_options = aut_modal_area_options|merge([{
28| 'value': area.id,
29| 'text': area.name|default('')
30| }]) %}
31|{% endfor %}
32|
33|{% set aut_modal_tipo_options = [{'value': '', 'text': 'Selecionar o tipo'}] %}
34|{% for typeLabel in aut_authorization_types|default([]) %}
35| {% if typeLabel %}
36| {% set aut_modal_tipo_options = aut_modal_tipo_options|merge([{
37| 'value': typeLabel,
38| 'text': typeLabel
39| }]) %}
40| {% endif %}
41|{% endfor %}
42|
43|{% set aut_modal_requisito_options = [{'value': '', 'text': 'Selecione os requisitos'}] %}
44|{% for c in aut_conditions_active|default([]) %}
45| {% set reqNome = c.nome|default('') %}
46| {% if reqNome %}
47| {% set aut_modal_requisito_options = aut_modal_requisito_options|merge([{
48| 'value': reqNome,
49| 'text': reqNome
50| }]) %}
51| {% endif %}
52|{% endfor %}
53|
54|{% set aut_modal_contractor_req_options = [{'value': '', 'text': 'Selecione os requisitos documentais'}] %}
55|{% for req in aut_contractor_requirements|default([]) %}
56| {% set reqTitulo = req.titulo|default('') %}
57| {% if req.id|default(null) and reqTitulo %}
58| {% set aut_modal_contractor_req_options = aut_modal_contractor_req_options|merge([{
59| 'value': req.id,
60| 'text': reqTitulo
61| }]) %}
62| {% endif %}
63|{% endfor %}
64|
65|{% embed 'components/_modal.html.twig' with {
66| modal_id: 'modalAdicionarAut',
67| modal_size: 'sm',
68| modal_fit_content: true,
69| modal_fixed_width: '640px',
70| footer_justify_content: 'space-between'
71|} %}
72| {% block modal_title %}
73| <span id="modalAdicionarAutTitulo">Criar Autorização</span>
74| {% endblock %}
75|
76| {% block modal_body %}
77| {% include 'components/validation/_modal_validation_ui.html.twig' with {
78| validation_scope_selector: '#modalAdicionarAut',
79| validation_render_assets: true,
80| validation_render_alert: false,
81| } %}
82|
83| <div id="aut-criar-validation-scope"
84| data-validation-scope="true"
85| data-validation-alert-selector="#aut-criar-validation-alert">
86|
87| {% include 'components/validation/_modal_validation_ui.html.twig' with {
88| validation_render_assets: false,
89| validation_render_alert: true,
90| validation_alert_id: 'aut-criar-validation-alert',
91| validation_alert_message: 'Preencha todos os campos obrigatórios',
92| } %}
93|
94| <form id="formAdicionarAut" class="modern-form governance-modal-form" onsubmit="return false;">
95| <input type="hidden" id="autCriarEdicaoId" value="">
96| <input type="hidden" id="autCriarStatusPreserve" value="ativa">
97|
98| <div class="form-group">
99| <label for="autCriarTitulo">
100| Título da autorização <span class="text-danger">*</span>
Request #100
deepseek-v4-flash
P:69.19K C:446 CR:67.84K CW:0
4010ms
Reasoning
The modal uses validation MV etc. Fine.
Let me check lines 94-240 to verify that the select ids/wrappers match `markAutCriarSelectInvalid`'s selector path `.aut-criar-modal-select-wrap` closest and `.custom-modern-select-trigger`. For each select include, the structure in the modal form is:
```
<div class="aut-criar-modal-select-wrap">
{% include '_custom_select.html.twig' with {...} %}
</div>
```
That means select is nested inside wrapper `div.aut-criar-modal-select-wrap`; `$sel.closest('.aut-criar-modal-select-wrap')` finds that div; `.find('.custom-modern-select-trigger')` inside custom-modern-select-wrapper. Good.
Now here's a possible issue: The new `.custom-modern-select-wrapper` also includes an inline `<script>` for `setCustomSelectLoading`; plus initializes custom select via initAllCustomSelectWrappers maybe in hub assets.
Now the relevant problem might be: markAutCriarSelectInvalid toggles `.is-invalid` on trigger only via MV or add class. The CSS for invalid only when `select.is-invalid` is parent or trigger is-invalid. They add both. OK.
Now let me examine more of create JS lines 1550-1700 and 1800-2080 for potential new bugs. Focus on the part where `applyAutCriarModalFields` is called in edit and view modes, and how `autCriarDescricao` handle. Let me read lines 1550-1660 & 1680-1760.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 1760, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig", "start_line": 1630}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig (Total lines: 2423)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1630-1760
1630| document.body.appendChild(modalEl);
1631| }
1632| initAutCriarReqTagSelect();
1633| initAutCriarContractorReqTagSelect();
1634| if (pendingAutCriarFill) {
1635| applyAutCriarModalFields(pendingAutCriarFill);
1636| pendingAutCriarFill = null;
1637| }
1638| if (typeof window.initAllCustomSelectWrappers === 'function') {
1639| window.initAllCustomSelectWrappers();
1640| }
1641| syncAutCriarCustomSelectOptions($('#autCriarRequisitoAdd'));
1642| syncAutCriarCustomSelectOptions($('#autCriarContractorReqAdd'));
1643| if (!getAutCriarRequisitosFromTags().length) {
1644| resetAutCriarCustomSelect('autCriarRequisitoAdd', '');
1645| updateAutCriarTagSelectCountLabel(AUT_REQ_TAG_CONFIG);
1646| }
1647| if (!getAutCriarContractorReqsFromTags().length) {
1648| resetAutCriarCustomSelect('autCriarContractorReqAdd', '');
1649| updateAutCriarTagSelectCountLabel(AUT_CONTRACTOR_REQ_TAG_CONFIG);
1650| }
1651| AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS.forEach(function (selectId) {
1652| var currentVal = $('#' + selectId).val();
1653| if (currentVal) {
1654| setAutCriarSelectValue(selectId, currentVal);
1655| }
1656| });
1657| });
1658|
1659| function resolveAutCriarResponsavelId(aut) {
1660| aut = aut || {};
1661| if (aut.responsavel_id) {
1662| return aut.responsavel_id;
1663| }
1664| if (aut.responsavel && aut.responsavel.id) {
1665| return aut.responsavel.id;
1666| }
1667| if (Array.isArray(aut.colaboradores) && aut.colaboradores[0] && aut.colaboradores[0].id) {
1668| return aut.colaboradores[0].id;
1669| }
1670| return '';
1671| }
1672|
1673| function resolveAutCriarPayload($btn) {
1674| var autId = parseInt(String(
1675| $btn.attr('data-aut-id')
1676| || $btn.closest('[data-aut-id]').attr('data-aut-id')
1677| || ''
1678| ), 10);
1679| if (autId && AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG[String(autId)]) {
1680| return $.extend(true, {}, AUT_CRIAR_CATALOG[String(autId)]);
1681| }
1682|
1683| var raw = String($btn.attr('data-aut') || '').trim();
1684| if (!raw) {
1685| return {};
1686| }
1687| try {
1688| return JSON.parse(raw);
1689| } catch (e) {
1690| return {};
1691| }
1692| }
1693|
1694| function ensureAutCriarSelectOption(selectId, value, text) {
1695| var $select = $('#' + selectId);
1696| var str = String(value || '').trim();
1697| if (!$select.length || !str) {
1698| return;
1699| }
1700| var exists = $select.find('option').filter(function () {
1701| return String($(this).val()) === str;
1702| }).length > 0;
1703| if (exists) {
1704| return;
1705| }
1706| var label = String(text || str).trim() || str;
1707| $select.append($('<option>', { value: str, text: label }));
1708| var $optionsBox = $select.closest('.custom-modern-select-wrapper').find('.custom-modern-options');
1709| if ($optionsBox.length) {
1710| $optionsBox.append($('<div>', {
1711| 'class': 'custom-modern-option',
1712| 'data-value': str,
1713| text: label
1714| }));
1715| }
1716| }
1717|
1718| function applyAutCriarModalFields(aut) {
1719| aut = aut || {};
1720| var areaId = aut.area_id || aut.area_responsavel_id || (aut.area && aut.area.id) || '';
1721| var aprovadorId = aut.aprovador_id || (aut.aprovador && aut.aprovador.id) || '';
1722| var aprovadorRoleId = aut.aprovador_role_id || (aut.aprovador_role && aut.aprovador_role.id) || '';
1723| var tipo = aut.tipo || aut.tipo_autorizacao || '';
1724| $('#autCriarEdicaoId').val(aut.id || '');
1725| $('#autCriarTitulo').val(aut.titulo || '');
1726| $('#autCriarDescricao').val(aut.descricao || aut.descricao_exibicao || '');
1727| $('#autCriarStatusPreserve').val(aut.status_real === 'inativa' ? 'inativa' : 'ativa');
1728| setAutCriarReqTags(Array.isArray(aut.requisitos) ? aut.requisitos.slice() : []);
1729| setAutCriarContractorReqTags(Array.isArray(aut.contractor_requirement_dependencies) ? aut.contractor_requirement_dependencies.slice() : []);
1730| setAutCriarSelectValue('autCriarResponsavel', resolveAutCriarResponsavelId(aut));
1731| ensureAutCriarSelectOption('autCriarArea', areaId, aut.area_name || (aut.area && aut.area.name) || '');
1732| setAutCriarSelectValue('autCriarArea', areaId);
1733| ensureAutCriarSelectOption('autCriarTipo', tipo, tipo);
1734| setAutCriarSelectValue('autCriarTipo', tipo);
1735| ensureAutCriarSelectOption(
1736| 'autCriarAprovador',
1737| aprovadorId,
1738| (aut.aprovador && aut.aprovador.name) || ''
1739| );
1740| setAutCriarSelectValue('autCriarAprovador', aprovadorId);
1741| ensureAutCriarSelectOption(
1742| 'autCriarAprovadorRole',
1743| aprovadorRoleId,
1744| (aut.aprovador_role && aut.aprovador_role.name) || ''
1745| );
1746| setAutCriarSelectValue('autCriarAprovadorRole', aprovadorRoleId);
1747| }
1748|
1749| function setAutCriarSelectValue(selectId, val) {
1750| var normalized = String(val || '');
1751| if (!normalized) {
1752| resetAutCriarCustomSelect(selectId, '');
1753| return;
1754| }
1755| setAutCriarCustomSelectValueSilent(selectId, normalized);
1756| }
1757|
1758| function setAutCriarResponsavelValue(val) {
1759| setAutCriarSelectValue('autCriarResponsavel', val);
1760| }
Request #101
deepseek-v4-flash
P:71.53K C:465 CR:69.63K CW:0
4568ms
Reasoning
Wait, important subtlety: `ensureAutCriarSelectOption` appends option to the select and to `.custom-modern-options` but does NOT re-run `syncAutCriarCustomSelectOptions`; but that function only hides options whose value is unavailable in the select. So OK.
But here's a REAL issue in `ensureAutCriarSelectOption` for `autCriarArea`: when editing an authorization whose area (id) does not have a matching option, it appends an option value=areaId text=area name. Then `setAutCriarSelectValue` sets selectedIndex to it, toggles selected UI classes. Good. But if the custom-modern UI is initialized (after initAllCustomSelectWrappers) with an internal state; appending manually might confuse. Still works since sync reads DOM .selected.
Now note that `applyAutCriarModalFields` sets autCriarArea etc BEFORE initAllCustomSelectWrappers? When modal is shown at first time, they call applyAutCriarModalFields then initAllCustomSelectWrappers() (line 1638). Actually order: line 1634-1637 apply; then initAllCustomSelectWrappers() at 1638. So UI triggers set after apply. When applyAutCriarModalFields calls setAutCriarCustomSelectValueSilent on elements, custom select components not yet "initialized", but the DOM operations set classes anyway. Then initAllCustomSelectWrappers reads the native select values? Actually initialization may store the initial value from select. Good.
Now let me read lines 1760-1840 for read functions and readonly, and the reset function to see possible new mistakes.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 1840, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig", "start_line": 1760}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig (Total lines: 2423)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1760-1840
1760| }
1761|
1762| function readAutCriarSelectValue(selectId) {
1763| syncAutCriarSelectFromCustomUi(selectId);
1764| return String($('#' + selectId).val() || '').trim();
1765| }
1766|
1767| function readAutCriarSelectId(selectId) {
1768| return parseInt(readAutCriarSelectValue(selectId), 10) || 0;
1769| }
1770|
1771| function readAutCriarResponsavelFromForm() {
1772| return readAutCriarSelectId('autCriarResponsavel');
1773| }
1774|
1775| function markAutCriarSelectInvalid(selectId) {
1776| var $sel = $('#' + selectId);
1777| var $trigger = $sel.closest('.aut-criar-modal-select-wrap').find('.custom-modern-select-trigger');
1778| if (MV) {
1779| MV.markInvalid($sel);
1780| MV.markInvalid($trigger);
1781| } else {
1782| $sel.addClass('is-invalid');
1783| $trigger.addClass('is-invalid');
1784| }
1785| }
1786|
1787| function setAutCriarModalReadonly(readonly) {
1788| $('#autCriarTitulo, #autCriarDescricao').prop('readonly', readonly);
1789| $('#autCriarRequisitoAdd, #autCriarContractorReqAdd, #autCriarResponsavel, #autCriarArea, #autCriarAprovador, #autCriarAprovadorRole, #autCriarTipo').prop('disabled', readonly);
1790| $('#modalAdicionarAut .aut-criar-modal-select-wrap').css('pointer-events', readonly ? 'none' : '');
1791| $('#autCriarRequisitosTags .occ-tag-remove').toggle(!readonly);
1792| $('#autCriarContractorReqTags .occ-tag-remove').toggle(!readonly);
1793| $('#btnSalvarAdicionarAut').toggle(!readonly);
1794| }
1795|
1796| function populateAutCriarModal(aut, mode, options) {
1797| options = options || {};
1798| resetModal();
1799| var isView = mode === 'view';
1800| setAutCriarModalReadonly(isView);
1801| pendingAutCriarFill = aut;
1802|
1803| if (isView) {
1804| $('#modalAdicionarAutTitulo').text('Visualizar Autorização');
1805| } else if (options.extendMode) {
1806| $('#modalAdicionarAutTitulo').text('Estender autorização');
1807| $('#autCriarBtnLabel').text('Salvar');
1808| } else {
1809| $('#modalAdicionarAutTitulo').text('Editar Autorização');
1810| $('#autCriarBtnLabel').text('Salvar');
1811| }
1812| $('#modalAdicionarAut').modal('show');
1813| }
1814|
1815| function resetModal() {
1816| $('#autCriarEdicaoId').val('');
1817| $('#autCriarTitulo').val('');
1818| $('#autCriarDescricao').val('');
1819| $('#autCriarStatusPreserve').val('ativa');
1820| resetAutCriarReqTags();
1821| resetAutCriarContractorReqTags();
1822| AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS.forEach(function (selectId) {
1823| setAutCriarSelectValue(selectId, '');
1824| });
1825| $('#modalAdicionarAutTitulo').text('Criar Autorização');
1826| $('#autCriarBtnLabel').text('Criar autorização');
1827| setAutCriarModalReadonly(false);
1828| if (MV) { MV.clearState(SCOPE); }
1829| else {
1830| $('#autCriarTitulo, #autCriarDescricao, #autCriarRequisitoAdd, #autCriarRequisitosTags, #autCriarContractorReqAdd, #autCriarContractorReqTags, #autCriarResponsavel, #autCriarArea, #autCriarAprovador, #autCriarAprovadorRole, #autCriarTipo').removeClass('is-invalid');
1831| $('#modalAdicionarAut .aut-criar-modal-select-wrap .custom-modern-select-trigger').removeClass('is-invalid');
1832| }
1833| }
1834|
1835| function setLoading(state) {
1836| var $btn = $('#btnSalvarAdicionarAut');
1837| var $sp = $('#autCriarSpinner');
1838| var $lbl = $('#autCriarBtnLabel');
1839| var $can = $('#modalAdicionarAut .mhs-btn-cancel');
1840| $btn.prop('disabled', state);
Request #102
deepseek-v4-flash
P:73.29K C:439 CR:71.94K CW:0
4446ms
Reasoning
Something here jumps out: `resetModal()` calls `setAutCriarModalReadonly(false)` which re-enables the selects and sets pointer-events. But wait, when the modal is in view mode, they call setAutCriarModalReadonly(true) before resetting? Actually `populateAutCriarModal` calls `resetModal()` (which enables everything), then if isView setAutCriarModalReadonly(true) then pending fill set. Good.
But consider sequence in modal show when clicking "Criar Autorização": resetModal() then apply? Actually clicking "Criar" maybe just opens modal without populateAutCriarModal, via show function calling resetModal. Fine.
Potential subtle bug: resetAutCriarCustomSelect('autCriarRequisitoAdd', '') etc not included in loop; requesito tags handle.
Now note: In `readAutCriarSelectValue`, they call `syncAutCriarSelectFromCustomUi(selectId)`; if the native select hasn't been updated from UI selection and no UI `.selected`, it may do nothing and read old value. But normal usage: the custom select UI and native select are kept in sync by custom select component. Fine.
Alright, let me look at open modal function `populateAutCriarModal` and event around lines 1420-1630 to check when selects get re-initialized (initAllCustomSelectWrappers). Also there is `modalAdicionarAut` "show.bs.modal" event listener. Let me read lines 1420-1630.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 1632, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig", "start_line": 1420}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig (Total lines: 2423)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1420-1632
1420| var autTableInstance = null;
1421| var autTableReadyCallbacks = [];
1422| var autTableResolveTimer = null;
1423| var autTableResolveAttempts = 0;
1424|
1425| function onAutTableReady(callback) {
1426| if (typeof callback !== 'function') { return; }
1427| if (autTableInstance) { callback(autTableInstance); return; }
1428| autTableReadyCallbacks.push(callback);
1429| }
1430|
1431| function resolveAutTable() {
1432| if (autTableInstance || typeof $.fn.DataTable !== 'function') { return; }
1433| if (!$.fn.DataTable.isDataTable('#authorizations-table')) { return; }
1434|
1435| autTableInstance = $('#authorizations-table').DataTable();
1436| autTableReadyCallbacks.forEach(function (cb) {
1437| try { cb(autTableInstance); } catch (e) {
1438| console.error('Erro no callback da DataTable de autorizações:', e);
1439| }
1440| });
1441| autTableReadyCallbacks = [];
1442| }
1443|
1444| function ensureAutTableReady() {
1445| resolveAutTable();
1446| if (autTableInstance || autTableResolveTimer) { return; }
1447|
1448| autTableResolveAttempts = 0;
1449| autTableResolveTimer = setInterval(function () {
1450| resolveAutTable();
1451| if (autTableInstance || ++autTableResolveAttempts >= 40) {
1452| clearInterval(autTableResolveTimer);
1453| autTableResolveTimer = null;
1454| }
1455| }, 150);
1456| }
1457|
1458| var AUT_VIEW_STORAGE_KEY = 'ssma_aut_view';
1459| var autCurrentView = localStorage.getItem(AUT_VIEW_STORAGE_KEY) || 'table';
1460|
1461| function applyAutView(view) {
1462| autCurrentView = view;
1463| localStorage.setItem(AUT_VIEW_STORAGE_KEY, view);
1464|
1465| var isTable = view === 'table';
1466| $('#aut-view-cards').toggleClass('d-none', isTable);
1467| $('#aut-view-table').toggleClass('occ-view-hidden', !isTable);
1468|
1469| if (isTable) {
1470| if (typeof window.setupDynamicTables === 'function') {
1471| window.setupDynamicTables();
1472| }
1473| ensureAutTableReady();
1474| if (autTableInstance) {
1475| var pageInfo = autTableInstance.page.info();
1476| autTableInstance.columns.adjust().page(pageInfo.page).draw(false);
1477| }
1478| }
1479|
1480| $('#aut-toggle-icon, #fab-toggle-aut-view i')
1481| .toggleClass('fa-table-list', !isTable)
1482| .toggleClass('fa-grip', isTable);
1483| }
1484|
1485| applyAutView(autCurrentView);
1486|
1487| $(document).on('click', '#tab_auth_criar_content .occ-view-toggle', function () {
1488| applyAutView(autCurrentView === 'card' ? 'table' : 'card');
1489| });
1490|
1491| var AUT_TABLE_STATUS_COL = 3;
1492| var AUT_TABLE_REQS_COL = 1;
1493|
1494| function getAutCriarFilters() {
1495| var desktopSearch = ($('#aut-criar-search-input').val() || '').trim();
1496| var mobileSearch = ($('#aut-criar-search-mobile-input').val() || '').trim();
1497|
1498| return {
1499| requisito: $('#aut-criar-requisito-filter').val() || $('#autCriarRequisitoFilterMobile').val() || 'todos',
1500| status: $('#aut-criar-status-filter').val() || $('#autCriarStatusFilterMobile').val() || 'todos',
1501| search: (desktopSearch || mobileSearch).toLowerCase()
1502| };
1503| }
1504|
1505| function hasActiveAutCriarFilters(filters) {
1506| filters = filters || getAutCriarFilters();
1507| return !!(filters.search || (filters.status && filters.status !== 'todos') || (filters.requisito && filters.requisito !== 'todos'));
1508| }
1509|
1510| function authorizationMatchesFilters($el, filters) {
1511| var title = String($el.attr('data-aut-title') || '');
1512| var status = String($el.attr('data-aut-status') || '').toLowerCase();
1513| var reqs = String($el.attr('data-aut-reqs') || '');
1514|
1515| if (filters.search && title.indexOf(filters.search) === -1) {
1516| return false;
1517| }
1518| if (filters.status && filters.status !== 'todos' && status !== filters.status) {
1519| return false;
1520| }
1521| if (filters.requisito && filters.requisito !== 'todos') {
1522| var reqNeedle = String(filters.requisito).toLowerCase();
1523| if (reqs.split('|').indexOf(reqNeedle) === -1) {
1524| return false;
1525| }
1526| }
1527| return true;
1528| }
1529|
1530| function applyAutCriarFilters() {
1531| var filters = getAutCriarFilters();
1532| var hasFilter = hasActiveAutCriarFilters(filters);
1533| var visibleCount = 0;
1534|
1535| ensureAutTableReady();
1536| if (autTableInstance) {
1537| try {
1538| var esc = $.fn.dataTable.util.escapeRegex;
1539| var statusLabel = '';
1540| if (filters.status === 'ativa') {
1541| statusLabel = 'Ativa';
1542| } else if (filters.status === 'inativa') {
1543| statusLabel = 'Inativa';
1544| }
1545| autTableInstance.column(AUT_TABLE_STATUS_COL).search(
1546| statusLabel ? '^' + esc(statusLabel) + '$' : '',
1547| true,
1548| false
1549| );
1550| autTableInstance.column(AUT_TABLE_REQS_COL).search(
1551| filters.requisito && filters.requisito !== 'todos' ? esc(filters.requisito) : '',
1552| true,
1553| false
1554| );
1555| autTableInstance.search(filters.search).draw();
1556| } catch (dtErr) {}
1557| }
1558|
1559| $('#aut-view-cards .aut-card-col').each(function () {
1560| var $col = $(this);
1561| var shouldShow = !hasFilter || authorizationMatchesFilters($col, filters);
1562| $col.toggleClass('d-none', !shouldShow);
1563| if (shouldShow) {
1564| visibleCount += 1;
1565| }
1566| });
1567|
1568| if (hasFilter && autCurrentView === 'table' && autTableInstance) {
1569| try {
1570| visibleCount = autTableInstance.rows({ search: 'applied' }).count();
1571| } catch (e) {}
1572| }
1573|
1574| var showEmptyState = hasFilter && visibleCount === 0;
1575| $('#ssma_authorizations_filter_empty_state').toggleClass('d-none', !showEmptyState);
1576| $('#aut-view-cards, #aut-view-table').toggleClass('aut-filter-empty-hidden', showEmptyState);
1577| }
1578|
1579| $(document).on('input keyup', '#aut-criar-search-input', applyAutCriarFilters);
1580|
1581| $(document).on('input keyup', '#aut-criar-search-mobile-input', function () {
1582| $('#aut-criar-search-input').val($(this).val()).trigger('input');
1583| });
1584|
1585| $(document).on('change', '#aut-criar-requisito-filter, #aut-criar-status-filter', applyAutCriarFilters);
1586|
1587| $(document).on('mobileBottomSheet:clear', '#autCriarFiltersMobile', function (e, payload) {
1588| var src = payload && payload.source ? payload.source : '';
1589| if (src !== 'user') {
1590| return;
1591| }
1592| $('#aut-criar-search-input, #aut-criar-search-mobile-input').val('');
1593| if (typeof window.setCustomSelectValue === 'function') {
1594| window.setCustomSelectValue('aut-criar-requisito-filter', 'todos');
1595| window.setCustomSelectValue('aut-criar-status-filter', 'todos');
1596| } else {
1597| $('#aut-criar-requisito-filter, #aut-criar-status-filter').val('todos');
1598| }
1599| if (typeof window.resetMobileSelectFullscreen === 'function') {
1600| window.resetMobileSelectFullscreen('autCriarRequisitoFilterMobile', false);
1601| window.resetMobileSelectFullscreen('autCriarStatusFilterMobile', false);
1602| } else {
1603| $('#autCriarRequisitoFilterMobile, #autCriarStatusFilterMobile').val('todos');
1604| }
1605| applyAutCriarFilters();
1606| });
1607|
1608| if (typeof MobileFilters !== 'undefined') {
1609| MobileFilters.syncMobileWithDesktop('autCriarRequisitoFilterMobile', 'aut-criar-requisito-filter');
1610| MobileFilters.syncMobileWithDesktop('autCriarStatusFilterMobile', 'aut-criar-status-filter');
1611| MobileFilters.syncSearchInputs('aut-criar-search-mobile-input', 'aut-criar-search-input');
1612| }
1613|
1614| function bootAutCriarTab() {
1615| applyAutCriarFilters();
1616| initAutCriarReqTagSelect();
1617| initAutCriarContractorReqTagSelect();
1618| ensureAutTableReady();
1619| }
1620|
1621| if (document.readyState === 'loading') {
1622| $(document).ready(bootAutCriarTab);
1623| } else {
1624| bootAutCriarTab();
1625| }
1626|
1627| $(document).on('shown.bs.modal', '#modalAdicionarAut', function () {
1628| var modalEl = document.getElementById('modalAdicionarAut');
1629| if (modalEl && modalEl.parentNode !== document.body) {
1630| document.body.appendChild(modalEl);
1631| }
1632| initAutCriarReqTagSelect();
Request #103
deepseek-v4-flash
P:76.47K C:2.97K CR:73.6K CW:0
25858ms
Reasoning
OK.
Now I've spent a lot; let me focus on what else in the settings template may be a bug to report as new issues.
Let me examine the HTML part of `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` lines 100-360 more carefully, particularly markup that duplicates the picker area CSS inside #govAuthAddApproverModal file and the `_modal_add_approver.html.twig` file, and check for missing element ids referenced in JS that might cause null dereferences:
References:
- `typeInput`, `typeChips`: present.
- `approverList`: present.
- `membersOption`, `rolesOption`, useMembers, useRoles, membersWrap, rolesWrap, membersBtn, rolesBtn: present.
- pickerBody, pickerSearch, pickerFilters, pickerFilterCargo, pickerFilterTeam, pickerFilterBond, pickerCheckAll, pickerSubmit: present in modal.
- catalogMembers, catalogRoles.
Modal markup lines 1-96 from partial includes those ids. In modal partial:
`govAuthPickerFilters` includes filter selects; yes.
The select fields for area options initially empty (no options), since types only loaded later. Wait: in `renderPickerRows`, they call `setPickerRowAreas(row, true, [])`, and `rebuildPickerAreaSelect` -> `fillAreaSelect(select, selectedKeys)` reads `currentTypes()` from chips which exist because types were added at startup. OK.
Now think about the picker modal open before type chips exist (company with no types configured): area select disabled with placeholder "Cadastre um tipo acima"; rows have all areas. Fine.
Potential bug: when types change while picker is open (impossible because picker modal blocks settings interactions), fine.
One more candidate bug: After the user adds approvers via picker and submits, the settings approver list gets the new row. But the role/member rows are added using name from row attribute `data-name`, that string may contain quotes; when used in `areaSelect.setAttribute('aria-label', ...)` with quotes? They use 'Áreas de aplicação de ' + name; setAttribute handles. OK.
Now, more importantly, the candidate regarding missing `initialRoleApprover` data for `ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers` is confirmed #3; skip.
Now let me see whether there might be a mismatch between the refresh types flow and the **create modal's own options list on initial page load**. On page load with config types loaded server-side, the modal form options are rendered from aut_authorization_types (server-side) and so a select of tipo includes them; and settings tab's JS also renders initial types. Then on save, refresh updates the select. Good.
But what about **roles list in the create form**: `aut_company_roles` from hub. Fine.
Now there might be an issue with the settings file's usage of `aut_authorization_types` when passed to modal create template and settings template: it's provided once per page. If user saves config in settings then switches to create tab, the select refreshed via ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes, but the options in the modal form are updated (native select options). Also the custom-modern UI options are updated. Yes.
However, if user instead opens the "Criar autorização" modal first, then opens Settings tab (same page? No — tabs). Both tabs share same DOM? Wait settings is a tab within the same page; create tab content in DOM persists. So refresh updates the select inside create modal (modal is hoisted to body). Good.
Now think about tab visibility default: page initial defaultAutTab likely tab_auth_criar. Settings is hidden but DOM present. So JS in both executes; IDs unique across the page? In create tab, id `govAuthTypeInput` etc not present. Fine. `AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS` refers to elements in create modal only.
But careful: the settings tab includes `_modal_add_approver` which includes CSS using IDs only prefixed by `#govAuthAddApproverModal` and `#governance_auth_settings_content`. Also global CSS class definitions `.gov-auth-picker-*`. The create modal also might contain elements with class `.gov-auth-settings-chip`? In create template there were req-tag classes `.ssma-shared-selection-tag`; no conflict.
Now possible bug: The create modal is shown/hidden via `.modal('show')`, and the settings' picker modal is also Bootstrap modal with backdrop. Both may conflict if one open while opening the other — but they're separate flows.
I think at this point, I should look for a genuinely new issue in the create JS regarding the readAutCriarSelect functions and **the select UI not syncing native select's value after user picks an option**. The custom select component probably updates the native hidden select value via `window.setCustomSelectValue(id, value)`. In this template, there is existing machinery for responsavel sync. OK.
Let's examine the openModal handler around lines 1627-1656 again: after applyAutCriarModalFields and initAllCustomSelectWrappers, they loop through AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS and set value from native select again. But wait: The loop at lines 1651-1656 reads `$('#'+selectId).val()` (native select) then calls setAutCriarSelectValue(selectId, currentVal) - sets label etc.
But after initAllCustomSelectWrappers, the component might reset the UI state based on its stored initial value... They call setAutCriarSelectValue after init. Good.
Now here is a potential bug in settings that hasn't been flagged: When you add a type then add an approver limited to that type, but the types list order changes? no.
Let me consider: **The approver area restrictions are saved as label strings; if a type label later changes case only, area_key normalization uses labelKey lower; but data-area-key stores the label with original case from selection**. When saving area_keys, it sends the label with original case as typed at the time of assignment. On reload from backend, `mapApprovers` uses `$approver->getApplicationTypeLabels()`. That label is the canonical current label from the type entity; since syncTypes reuses the entity label when same key, casing retained by server canonical label. Fine.
But there's a subtle frontend bug: When adding type chip, the chip label stored as typed in `data-type: labelKey` and chip text. When you then restrict an approver to it, area key stored as typed. If server canonicalizes differently? Server trims and lowercases for compare but preserves original label. Since both sides preserve typed label, fine.
Edge: If a type has leading/trailing spaces: normalizeLabel trims on chip creation. Server also trims on save. Good.
Let me investigate whether there's a genuine problem: `addTypeChip` calls `hasChip(typeChips, label)` using data-type key = labelKey(label) (case-insensitive). Duplicates prevented. OK.
Now potential issue: Types with max 80 chars but no lower bound; an empty string Enter does nothing and clears input. Fine. Type that is only spaces yields ''; addTypeChip returns false but input cleared. Fine.
What about when a user adds a type and schedules save; server caps at 100 types and validates; if >100, save fails with message. But UI only shows error toast; added chips remain in the DOM and continue to be re-sent on subsequent autosave until removed. After a failing save (e.g., >100 types or invalid), the next change retries the same invalid payload... They do clear invalid server error but don't rollback. Actually failed saves keep state, so future saves keep failing. Confirmed #6 partially covers error not handled; not repeat.
Let me examine the markInvalid for settings type chips? Server-side validation for tipo unknown key (approver area key not among types) shouldn't happen since UI keeps types in sync. Except backend also rejects if area_key references a type removed between save debounce... fine.
Now new issue candidates:
Candidate (a): In settings, `initialTypes.forEach(addTypeChip);` Each call to addTypeChip invokes `syncAllApproverAreaSelects()` and `scheduleSave()`; skipSave is true at that point, so no save. But after hydrating approver rows (which add area keys from server with original labels that might differ in case from chips created earlier?) If case differs only, syncAllApproverAreaSelects is never invoked after adding rows; area chips show server labels. Fine.
Candidate (b): `approver roles/members added with restricted area where types currently empty` because hydrateAssignments occurs after type chips added, good.
Candidate (c): settings loads catalog of all members and roles but doesn't filter to only those not removed; server asserts membership; removed members silently skipped on save; but picker may show removed/inactive? allMembers likely already active members. Whatever.
Given time, maybe the better approach is to search the settings file for any direct `.innerHTML` usage with data, or `insertAdjacentHTML`, etc. Only `pickerBody.innerHTML = ''` clearing. No injection.
Now, examine create template's new visualizar button always visible: previously only visible when can create. Now any user that can access create tab sees it. But can view requires ssmaCanCreateAuthorization or other permission? The View/Edit actions cell logic: users with no permission to create previously couldn't view the record? Now they always see the eye button. But is the eye handler gated? Let's look at JS handler for js-aut-criar-visualizar and whether it checks permissions. Actually maybe there is a viewer route requiring permission. The user without create permission may get error when opening view (visualize). But is the tab itself gated by create permission? The tab `tab_auth_criar_content` is rendered only if `ssmaCanCreateAuthorization`. So if create permission false, the whole create tab isn't shown, and this new code path (eye outside canCreate block) only affects users within the create tab but who lost create? Since tab presence gated by same permission, making the eye unconditional in a tab that requires the permission to view is harmless. But actually within ssmaCanCreateAuthorization, previously actions only if can create too, so nothing changed effectively; eye shown now always inside a tab requiring permission. Hmm, the tab gating is `{% if ssmaCanCreateAuthorization %}` for the div. So eye button change effectively only matters where user has create permission anyway. Then the code refactor (moving the eye out of the canCreate block) is mostly no-op unless there are finer-grained differences: the actions cell also contains edit/delete buttons gated by canCreate plus more inner conditions (maybe can_edit/can_delete attributes). The eye now always present under the tab permission. So fine.
OK so maybe few additional genuine issues. Let me re-examine the `markAutCriarSelectInvalid` with the **hidden native select** and MV. MV.markInvalid probably adds a red border/tooltip to an element and expects a visible input. Calling MV.markInvalid($sel) where $sel is hidden select (display:none via inline style) could create an error message positioned badly but it's the pattern they use. There was previously also MV.markInvalid on hidden select #autCriarResponsavel so fine.
Now potential bug: In the else branch of save validation they clear invalid classes on selects, but `MV.clearState` maybe? OK.
Now — new distinct issue: the `readAutCriarSelectValue` syncs from custom UI but if native select's UI isn't `.custom-modern-select-wrapper` (all new selects are, yes).
One more: In `markAutCriarSelectInvalid`, when MV exists, `MV.markInvalid($sel)` and `MV.markInvalid($trigger)` mark hidden native select plus trigger. But note that the earlier code path only marked trigger (and select). Same behavior.
I think I've covered enough. Let me consider the cross-file observation in the diff: the new tab's autosave calls `ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes` (defined only in the create tab JS on the same page). Wait — create tab is only rendered when `ssmaCanCreateAuthorization`. But settings tab renders when `ssmaCanManageConfig`. What if a manager can manage config but NOT create authorizations? Can that happen? `ssmaCanManageConfig` for manager roles true; `ssmaCanCreateAuthorization` maybe separate. If a user can manage config but cannot create authorizations, then create tab JS not loaded and refresh function absent → guarded by typeof check, and the tipo select doesn't exist either. So settings works standalone. Good.
But importantly: if user can create authorizations but NOT manage config (ssmaCanCreateAuthorization true, ssmaCanManageConfig false), then the create tab is present with the tipo select which is initially empty since no config types? Actually options come from `aut_authorization_types` which likely comes from the hub controller regardless (config GET maybe not; hub data uses service getViewData for the create tab? Not in the diff). Let's check where aut_authorization_types is injected for the create tab. In `_modal_authorization_form.html.twig`, `aut_authorization_types` also used. That template included within create tab content, so the create tab hub must provide it, or it defaults to []. Let me search GovernanceController hub method to see if it passes aut_authorization_types to the authorization index render. Search.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "aut_authorization_use_members|aut_company_areas|aut_authorization_approver_members"}
Result
No matches found
Request #104
deepseek-v4-flash
P:79.46K C:179 CR:79.36K CW:0
2865ms
Reasoning
No controller passes these template variables (only those in GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery service and controller for show route JSON). So where do these variables get injected into the template view? Perhaps the controller merges `$hubView = (new GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery(...))->build($company)` into the main render variables. Let me search GovernanceController or wherever renders index for authorization. Search in templates? Let me search for the render of the index template.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "governance/authorization/index.html.twig"}
Result
File: docs/engineering/pr/new_staging2/PR_arquivos_new_staging2.txt
Match lines: 1
1507|M templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig
File: docs/engineering/pr/new_staging2/PR_impacto_new_staging2.txt
Match lines: 1
1507| templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig | 89 +-
File: docs/governance/GOVERNANCE_MODULE_OVERVIEW.md
Match lines: 2
45|A tela de Autorizações e renderizada por `templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig`. Ela usa o shell padrao do usuario (`layoutAdmin.html.twig` ou `layoutUser.html.twig`) e divide a experiencia em abas.
191|- `templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig`
File: docs/ssma/AUTORIZACOES_ALINHAMENTO_PRODUTO.md
Match lines: 1
16|| Governança — abas Monitoramento / Criação / Permissões | `templates/governance/authorization/index.html.twig`, `templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_*.html.twig` |
File: docs/ssma/PRODUTO_SSMA_MAPA_COMPLETO.md
Match lines: 1
439|**Hub:** [BASE/manager/governance/authorizations](BASE/manager/governance/authorizations) · Template `governance/authorization/index.html.twig`
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php
Match lines: 1
417| return $this->render('governance/authorization/index.html.twig', $this->buildAuthorizationHubContext());
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
739| return $this->render('governance/authorization/index.html.twig', array_merge($viewData, $autData, [
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "configHubQuery"}
Result
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php Match lines: 5 37|use App\Service\Governance\GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery; 66| private GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery $authorizationConfigHubQuery; 94| GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery $authorizationConfigHubQuery, 121| $this->authorizationConfigHubQuery = $authorizationConfigHubQuery; 1330| return array_merge($viewData, $autData, $this->authorizationConfigHubQuery->build($company), [ File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery.php Match lines: 1 11|final class GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery File: tests/Unit/Product/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQueryTest.php Match lines: 4 11|use App\Service\Governance\GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery; 16|final class GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQueryTest extends TestCase 20| $query = new GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery( 58| $query = new GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery(
Request #105
deepseek-v4-flash
P:80.32K C:290 CR:79.62K CW:0
3202ms
Reasoning
GovernanceController authorization index merges `authorizationConfigHubQuery->build($company)` (line 1330). Also SsmaController at line 739 merges `$autData` and also aut config? Let me inspect around GovernanceController 1300-1340 and SsmaController 720-750 to see whether the variables (aut_company_areas, aut_company_roles, aut_authorization_types) are also passed in the SsmaController path (the second render at 739). If the page also rendered via SsmaController, does it merge the config hub? Let me read.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 1345, "file_path": "src/Controller/GovernanceController.php", "start_line": 1300}
Result
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php (Total lines: 6066)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1300-1345
1300| )
1301| : [
1302| 'aut_rows' => [],
1303| 'aut_all' => [],
1304| 'aut_ativas' => 0,
1305| 'aut_vencidas' => 0,
1306| 'aut_a_vencer' => 0,
1307| 'aut_colabs_sem_aut' => 0,
1308| 'aut_perc_conformidade' => 0,
1309| 'aut_teams_by_status' => [],
1310| 'aut_kpi_total' => 0,
1311| 'aut_kpi_ativas' => 0,
1312| 'aut_kpi_inativas' => 0,
1313| 'aut_kpi_colaboradores' => 0,
1314| 'aut_alertas' => [],
1315| 'aut_chart_data' => ['vencidas' => 0, 'proximos_30' => 0, 'dias_31_60' => 0, 'dias_61_90' => 0],
1316| 'aut_expired_by_team' => [],
1317| 'aut_requisitos_catalog' => AutorizacaoRequisitoCatalog::labelsOrdered(),
1318| ];
1319|
1320| $autConditions = $company
1321| ? $this->authorizationConditionConfig->getConditionsForFrontend($company)
1322| : [];
1323| $contractorRequirements = $company
1324| ? array_values(array_filter(
1325| $this->contractorRequirementService->listForFrontend($company),
1326| static fn (array $requirement): bool => ($requirement['active'] ?? true) !== false
1327| ))
1328| : [];
1329|
1330| return array_merge($viewData, $autData, $this->authorizationConfigHubQuery->build($company), [
1331| 'aut_conditions' => $autConditions,
1332| 'aut_classif_catalog' => GovernanceAuthorizationConditionConfigService::classificacoesPorTipo(),
1333| 'aut_contractor_requirements' => $contractorRequirements,
1334| ]);
1335| }
1336|
1337| public function authorizationSave(Request $request): JsonResponse
1338| {
1339| if (!$this->canManageAuthorizations()) {
1340| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Sem permissão.'], 403);
1341| }
1342|
1343| $company = $this->currentGovernanceCompany();
1344|
1345| if (!$company) {
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 760, "file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 700}
Result
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 27759)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 700-760
700| $this->ssmaLogger->error('[SSMA] Falha ao salvar config Direito de Recusa: ' . $e->getMessage());
701|
702| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Não foi possível salvar as configurações.'], 500);
703| }
704|
705| return $this->json(['success' => true, 'message' => 'Configurações salvas.']);
706| }
707|
708| public function autorizacaoIndex(): Response
709| {
710| if (!$this->canAccessSsmaAuthorizationHub()) {
711| throw $this->createAccessDeniedException('Sem permissão para acessar Autorizações SSMA.');
712| }
713|
714| $viewData = $this->buildSsmaViewData();
715|
716| /** @var User|null $user */
717| $user = $this->getUser();
718| $company = $this->getSsmaCompany();
719|
720| $autData = $company
721| ? $this->loadAutorizacoesData($company, $viewData['allMembers'], $viewData['teams'] ?? [])
722| : [
723| 'aut_rows' => [],
724| 'aut_all' => [],
725| 'aut_ativas' => 0,
726| 'aut_vencidas' => 0,
727| 'aut_colabs_sem_aut' => 0,
728| 'aut_perc_conformidade' => 0,
729| 'aut_alertas' => [],
730| 'aut_chart_data' => ['vencidas' => 0, 'proximos_30' => 0, 'dias_31_60' => 0, 'dias_61_90' => 0],
731| 'aut_expired_by_team' => [],
732| 'aut_requisitos_catalog' => AutorizacaoRequisitoCatalog::labelsOrdered(),
733| ];
734|
735| $autConditions = $company
736| ? $this->ssmaAutConditionConfig->getConditionsForFrontend($company)
737| : [];
738|
739| return $this->render('governance/authorization/index.html.twig', array_merge($viewData, $autData, [
740| 'aut_conditions' => $autConditions,
741| 'aut_classif_catalog' => GovernanceAuthorizationConditionConfigService::classificacoesPorTipo(),
742| ]));
743| }
744|
745| public function causeTreeIndex(): Response
746| {
747| if (!$this->canAccessSsmaCauseTreeHub()) {
748| throw $this->createAccessDeniedException('Sem permissão para acessar Análise de Causas SSMA.');
749| }
750|
751| $viewData = $this->buildSsmaViewData();
752|
753| /** @var User|null $user */
754| $user = $this->getUser();
755| $company = $this->getSsmaCompany();
756| $companyId = $company ? (int) $company->getId() : 0;
757| // TODO: Replace this temporary occurrence source when the cause tree back-end exposes its own dedicated occurrence lookup endpoint.
758| $occurrenceOptions = $this->buildCauseTreeOccurrenceOptions($viewData['occurrences'] ?? []);
759| $cards = $companyId > 0 ? $this->ssmaCauseTreeService->getTreeCards($companyId) : [];
760| if ($company instanceof Company && $user instanceof User) {
Request #106
deepseek-v4-flash
P:82.15K C:839 CR:80.51K CW:0
6923ms
Reasoning
This is an important cross-file discrepancy! The index template is rendered from **two controllers**: `GovernanceController::authorizationIndex` (via Governance hub) which merges `authorizationConfigHubQuery->build($company)` providing `aut_authorization_types`, `aut_authorization_use_members`, `aut_authorization_use_roles`, `aut_authorization_approver_members/roles`, `aut_company_roles`, `aut_company_areas`, and `SsmaController::autorizacaoIndex` which renders the same template WITHOUT those config variables (only merges viewData, autData, aut_conditions, aut_classif_catalog).
Let's examine the template usage of the config-hub variables:
1. `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` is included in index always (under ssmaCanManageConfig). The settings JS references:
- `{{ aut_authorization_types|default([])|json_encode|raw }}` → default [] OK.
- `{{ aut_authorization_approver_members|default([]) }}` default [].
- `{{ allMembers|default([]) }}` — SsmaController viewData likely provides allMembers.
- `{{ aut_company_roles|default([]) }}` default [].
So settings would render with no data from SSMA controller, but not crash.
2. `_modal_authorization_form.html.twig`:
- `aut_company_areas|default([])` default [] — creates only placeholder select option. So the required "Área Responsável" select would have NO options when accessed from SSMA hub!
- `aut_company_roles|default([])` default [] — aprovador role select empty.
- `aut_authorization_types|default([])` default [] — tipo select empty.
So on the SSMA side (if still accessible), the new required fields would have empty options; a user can't create authorizations because area is required but there is no area option. That is a functional regression — provided the SSMA hub renders this same template and users can still reach it (the page has tabs). Actually wait — do both controllers render this page to the same route? GovernanceController authorization page at /manager/governance/authorizations; SsmaController autorizacaoIndex at some /ssma/... route. Both render the same template file. So the SSMA page is impacted.
Hmm, but this cross-file observation targets code inside review files (the create modal template and settings template referencing these vars), while the controller updates are outside review files and per user instruction: "Your comments must address code within <review_files> — never produce comments targeting files outside it." So I should comment on the templates that now depend on variables not present in one of the two rendering controllers. That is a cross-file observation between review files (templates) and context files (controllers). But comments must target code in review files. We can anchor to the line in `_modal_authorization_form.html.twig` where `aut_company_areas` is used, and note that this page is also rendered by SsmaController which doesn't inject these variables, so on that route the area/tipo selects are empty and validation can't be satisfied.
Actually — wait: which hub is actually used in production? The module "Central de Governança" is GovernanceController; the SsmaController autorizacaoIndex seems legacy SSMA hub route that may still exist. In the PR description, the feature is Central de Governança → Autorizações. Does SsmaController autorizacaoIndex still reachable? Let me check routes. Search routes mapping to autorizacaoIndex.
Let's look in the routes file.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "autorizacaoIndex|GovernanceController::authorization"}
Result
No matches found
Request #107
deepseek-v4-flash
P:83.01K C:112 CR:82.94K CW:0
2201ms
Reasoning
Search with method reference in routes. Let me search 'autorizacoes' paths etc.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "autorizacoes", "file_patterns": ["config/routes*.yaml", "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "src/Controller/GovernanceController.php"]}
Result
File: config/routes.yaml
Match lines: 2
1569|my_company_member_autorizacoes_panel:
1570| path: /my-company/member/{member}/autorizacoes/panel
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php
Match lines: 6
3015| /** @var GovernanceAuthorization[] $autorizacoes */
3016| $autorizacoes = $this->entityManager->getRepository(GovernanceAuthorization::class)
3070| foreach ($autorizacoes as $aut) {
3264| foreach ($autorizacoes as $aut) {
4302| $targetDir = $this->getParameter('kernel.project_dir') . '/public/uploads/ssma/autorizacoes/' . (int) $company->getId();
4314| $relativePath = 'uploads/ssma/autorizacoes/' . (int) $company->getId() . '/' . $storedName;
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 8
721| ? $this->loadAutorizacoesData($company, $viewData['allMembers'], $viewData['teams'] ?? [])
2329| private function loadAutorizacoesData(Company $company, array $allMembers, array $teams): array
2331| /** @var GovernanceAuthorization[] $autorizacoes */
2332| $autorizacoes = $this->entityManager->getRepository(GovernanceAuthorization::class)
2360| foreach ($autorizacoes as $aut) {
2467| foreach ($autorizacoes as $aut) {
2754| $targetDir = $this->getParameter('kernel.project_dir') . '/public/uploads/ssma/autorizacoes/' . (int) $company->getId();
2766| $relativePath = 'uploads/ssma/autorizacoes/' . (int) $company->getId() . '/' . $storedName;
Request #108
deepseek-v4-flash
P:83.57K C:241 CR:83.07K CW:0
2679ms
Reasoning
Let me find the route that maps to SsmaController::autorizacaoIndex and GovernanceController authorization index method. Search for the controllers in route files. Search 'GovernanceController::authorization' no match. Let's look at how the authorization hub page route is defined. Search the route name for authorization index; check GovernanceController's method above line 1330 — need method name. Let me view around 1240-1300.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "function authorization", "file_patterns": ["src/Controller/GovernanceController.php", "src/Controller/SsmaController.php"]}
Result
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php Match lines: 25 411| public function authorizationIndex(): Response 420| public function authorizationMonitoring(): Response 429| public function authorizationMonitoringPanel(): JsonResponse 1337| public function authorizationSave(Request $request): JsonResponse 1478| public function authorizationRemove(Request $request, int $id): JsonResponse 1531| public function authorizationUsage(int $id): JsonResponse 1565| public function authorizationDetail(int $id): JsonResponse 1606| public function authorizationDeactivate(Request $request, int $id): JsonResponse 1649| public function authorizationActivate(Request $request, int $id): JsonResponse 1692| public function authorizationUnlinkMember(int $autId, int $memberId): JsonResponse 1714| public function authorizationBlockMember(Request $request, int $autId, int $memberId): JsonResponse 1797| public function authorizationApplyMembers(Request $request): JsonResponse 1936| public function authorizationNotifyMember(Request $request, int $autId, int $memberId): JsonResponse 1992| public function authorizationExtendValidity(Request $request, int $autId): JsonResponse 2037| public function authorizationDocumentsList(int $autId, int $memberId): JsonResponse 2113| public function authorizationMemberCnhGet(Request $request, int $memberId): JsonResponse 2131| public function authorizationMemberCnhSave(Request $request, int $memberId): JsonResponse 2230| public function authorizationRequirementValiditySave(Request $request, int $autId, int $memberId): JsonResponse 2324| public function authorizationDocumentUpload(Request $request, int $autId, int $memberId): JsonResponse 2549| public function authorizationDocumentValidate(Request $request, int $docId): JsonResponse 2746| public function authorizationDocumentRemove(int $docId): JsonResponse 2846| public function authorizationConditionsGet(): JsonResponse 2862| public function authorizationConditionsSave(Request $request): JsonResponse 2893| public function authorizationConditionUsage(Request $request): JsonResponse 3526| private function authorizationHistoryCaseKey(int $authorizationId): string
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "authorizations", "file_patterns": ["config/routes_governance.yaml", "config/routes*.yaml"]}
Result
File: config/routes.yaml
Match lines: 1
1571| controller: App\Controller\CompanyMemberController::memberAuthorizationsPanel
File: config/routes_governance.yaml
Match lines: 29
154| path: /manager/governance/authorizations
159| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/monitoring
164| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/monitoring/panel
231| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/save
232| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::authorizationSave
236| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/{id}
243| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/{id}/usage
250| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/{id}/detail
257| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/{id}/deactivate
264| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/{id}/activate
271| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/{autId}/member/{memberId}/unlink
279| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/{autId}/member/{memberId}/block
284| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/apply-members
289| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/{autId}/member/{memberId}/notify
297| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/{autId}/extend-validity
304| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/{autId}/member/{memberId}/documents
312| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/{autId}/member/{memberId}/documents/upload
320| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/{autId}/member/{memberId}/requirement-validity
328| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/document/{docId}/validate
335| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/document/{docId}/remove
342| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/member/{memberId}/cnh
349| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/member/{memberId}/cnh/save
356| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/conditions
361| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/conditions
366| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/conditions/usage
371| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/config
376| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/config
386| path: /user/pendencies/authorizations/{autId}/documents
393| path: /user/pendencies/authorizations/{autId}/documents/upload
Request #109
deepseek-v4-flash
P:84.94K C:106 CR:83.71K CW:0
1751ms
Reasoning
Let me look at route lines 145-160 to see controller for the authorization hub page path.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 165, "file_path": "config/routes_governance.yaml", "start_line": 145}
Result
File: config/routes_governance.yaml (Total lines: 408) IS_TRUNCATED: false LINE_RANGE: 145-165 145| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::casesAssign 146| methods: [POST] 147| 148|governance_cases_sla_due_save: 149| path: /manager/governance/cases/sla-due/save 150| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::casesSlaDueSave 151| methods: [POST] 152| 153|governance_authorization_index: 154| path: /manager/governance/authorizations 155| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::authorizationIndex 156| methods: [GET] 157| 158|governance_authorization_monitoring: 159| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/monitoring 160| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::authorizationMonitoring 161| methods: [GET] 162| 163|governance_authorization_monitoring_panel: 164| path: /manager/governance/authorizations/monitoring/panel 165| controller: App\Controller\GovernanceController::authorizationMonitoringPanel
Request #110
deepseek-v4-flash
P:85.33K C:223 CR:84.99K CW:0
2973ms
Reasoning
The route governance_authorization_index maps only to GovernanceController::authorizationIndex which merges config hub query data. The SsmaController::autorizacaoIndex maps to what route? Search the routes for 'autorizacaoIndex' no. Search for the method reference maybe in routes_ssma yaml or ssma routes. It's probably defined under ssma routes file. Let me search the routes files for `SsmaController::autorizacaoIndex`. Earlier search returned no matches because I searched in two files plus routes? Wait I searched autorizacaoIndex in code_search with file_patterns config/routes*.yaml and controllers; returned no match. Maybe route uses method name 'autorizacaoIndex' elsewhere; but search found no match means not routed currently? Let's search for 'autorizacaoIndex' again across all files.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "autorizacaoIndex"}
Result
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php Match lines: 1 708| public function autorizacaoIndex(): Response
Request #111
deepseek-v4-flash
P:85.6K C:142 CR:85.5K CW:0
2609ms
Reasoning
Only found the method definition, no route references it — it might be routed by annotations/attributes inside the controller file. Let me search for route attributes in SsmaController near line 700 (annotation above method). Check file content near method definition beginning at line ~690.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 712, "file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 640}
Result
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 27759)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 640-712
640| );
641| } catch (\Throwable $e) {
642| $this->ssmaLogger->warning('[SSMA] Falha ao notificar líder do Direito de Recusa: ' . $e->getMessage());
643| }
644| }
645| }
646|
647| if ($entity->isActivityInterrupted() || !$entity->isRisksControlled()) {
648| $leader = $entity->getDirectLeaderMember();
649| $supervision = $leader?->getSuperior() ?: $leader;
650| $supervisionUser = $supervision?->getUser();
651| if ($supervisionUser instanceof User) {
652| try {
653| $this->notificationsCenterService->createNotification(
654| $supervisionUser,
655| 'ssma',
656| 'ocorrencias',
657| sprintf(
658| 'Atividade interrompida por Direito de Recusa (#%d) — riscos não controlados em %s (%s).',
659| (int) $entity->getId(),
660| $location,
661| $collabName
662| ),
663| NotificationsCenter::TYPE_PROBLEM,
664| $sender,
665| $url
666| );
667| } catch (\Throwable $e) {
668| $this->ssmaLogger->warning('[SSMA] Falha ao notificar supervisão do Direito de Recusa: ' . $e->getMessage());
669| }
670| }
671| }
672| }
673|
674| public function saveDireitoRecusaConfig(Request $request): JsonResponse
675| {
676| if (!($this->canManageSsmaConfig())) {
677| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Sem permissão para editar configurações.'], 403);
678| }
679|
680| $company = $this->getSsmaCompany();
681| if (!$company) {
682| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Empresa não encontrada.'], 400);
683| }
684|
685| $payload = json_decode($request->getContent() ?: '{}', true);
686| if (!is_array($payload)) {
687| $payload = $request->request->all();
688| }
689|
690| $flowA = array_map('intval', (array) ($payload['flow_a_member_ids'] ?? []));
691| $flowB = array_map('intval', (array) ($payload['flow_b_member_ids'] ?? []));
692|
693| try {
694| $this->ssmaRefusalRightService->saveConfig($company, $flowA, $flowB);
695| } catch (\RuntimeException $e) {
696| $this->ssmaLogger->error('[SSMA] Direito de Recusa config schema/runtime: ' . $e->getMessage());
697|
698| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => $e->getMessage()], 503);
699| } catch (\Throwable $e) {
700| $this->ssmaLogger->error('[SSMA] Falha ao salvar config Direito de Recusa: ' . $e->getMessage());
701|
702| return $this->json(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Não foi possível salvar as configurações.'], 500);
703| }
704|
705| return $this->json(['success' => true, 'message' => 'Configurações salvas.']);
706| }
707|
708| public function autorizacaoIndex(): Response
709| {
710| if (!$this->canAccessSsmaAuthorizationHub()) {
711| throw $this->createAccessDeniedException('Sem permissão para acessar Autorizações SSMA.');
712| }
Request #112
deepseek-v4-flash
P:86.67K C:1.53K CR:85.63K CW:0
13689ms
Reasoning
No route attribute visible before the method in the snippet (might be annotations defined higher up? The earlier lines were for saveDireitoRecusaConfig method; before autorizacaoIndex at 708 there's no annotation between line 706-707. Could be attribute-based with e.g. #[Route(...)] lines above. Need a bit more lines around 706? lines 640-712 shown; nothing. So autorizacaoIndex may be routed elsewhere through a master route file that maps URLs to controller actions maybe using a generic import pattern (e.g., in routes_ssma.yaml referencing the controller with method name). Search didn't find "autorizacaoIndex" references in routes so possibly it's not routed at all, or routed via wildcard in a legacy mapping e.g., `@Route("/.../autorizacoes")` above a class block? Since we only saw a partial; maybe the annotation is above line 640? But that region belongs to previous method. Hmm; maybe the whole SsmaController file uses annotations with comments? Some methods may not have attributes because their route is defined in yaml elsewhere using class-wide prefix plus method-based? Unlikely.
Given no match found anywhere for autorizacaoIndex string except its definition, it is probably dead code (unused/not routed) — or the route is registered via a DI alias that maps methods by convention, but not visible. Let me search for 'ssma_autorizacao' or route names referencing "authorization". Actually I earlier searched routes files for 'autorizacoes' only found my_company member route and GovernanceController matches, so likely the SSMA autorizacao hub is a legacy endpoint maybe superseded by Governance route.
Given uncertainty, I won't raise that as an issue because it's too speculative; GovernanceController merges the variables so primary path fine.
Wait — GovernanceController line 411 authorizationIndex. Let's view around it to ensure ssmaCanManageConfig and variable passing match the templates (defaultAutTab etc.) but that's pre-existing.
Let me now focus and settle the review findings. Confirmed findings have 6. I should report only new issues not among them. Let me think about potential new genuine issues:
1. **XSS possibility from type names used as select option values in the create form when rendering `aut_modal_tipo_options` and then user sets `tipo` reading `.val()`**: no.
2. **`ensureAutCriarSelectOption` leaves stale options appended after editing removed types/areas** — when modal is reset for a new create (e.g., creating after having edited a record that had an "orphan" area/type), the option remains selectable, letting the user submit a tipo/área that no longer exists in the catalog; minor inconsistency. But it's probably acceptable as old auths keep their orphan types? Actually types removed from config shouldn't remain valid for new authorizations. But we don't have strong evidence about type deletion effects. Eh.
3. **AprovadorRole options built from `aut_company_roles` each render; but settings store role approvers possibly including removed roles... fine.
4. **Race/UX**: When saving config, `ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes` only refreshes the select options but NOT the currently open modal options custom UI? It does update both native select and UI box.
5. **In settings, `saveTimer` not flushed on tab hide/unload** — already covered.
6. **settings autosave immediately triggers for every init?** no, skipSave.
7. **Use of `window.jQuery` without $.** fine.
8. **`catalogRoles` may contain roles that are also present in approver list? picker filters those out with hasApproverRow(pickerKind='role', id) checking rows in settings list. good.
9. **Duplicate roles/members selections:** submitPicker loops selected rows and addApproverRow with silent true. Wait, addApproverRow has `if (!approverList || !id || hasApproverRow(kind, id)) return false;` guard against duplicates. But renderPickerRows already excluded existing rows, so fine.
10. **Bug: `approverList` rows of members added via picker won't be re-rendered by other tab changes** no.
11. **Possible DOM id collision for the area/pill selectors with the settings approver row select and the picker select**: `.gov-auth-picker-area-select` only in picker; `.gov-auth-approver-area-select` only in settings.
12. **Focus/scroll**: blur handler is capture at pickerBody; fine.
13. **Missing enter-to-add guard against invalid length beyond 80**: input maxlength 80 attribute blocks, but programmatic additions? users paste over 80? maxlength prevents. Server also caps. Good.
Now, what about the required labels: "Tipo de autorização *" and the empty-type select options if the admin hasn't configured any types. On create modal from Governance hub, aut_authorization_types loaded; if empty (no config), then tipo select only has placeholder and is required; a user with create permission but no config (config managed by someone else) cannot create authorization because Tipo has no options and Area options likewise rely on aut_company_areas. Hmm, area list depends on `aut_company_areas` from hub query, which is available for Governance route. So they can pick area, but tipo list empty until admin config types. That means create flow now requires at least one configured type; pre-existing authorizations created without a type are unaffected but new ones blocked until admin creates config types. Is that desired? "No cadastro: Área, Tipo ... obrigatórios". So a company without config types cannot create new authorizations — that seems to be intended given tipo is now required and sourced from config. Could be an important product regression for companies that never configure types: all creation is blocked (tipo required, but empty). That could be flagged as an issue: There's no fallback allowing creation when no types are configured, and the UI shows an empty "Selecionar o tipo" select with nothing to choose (not even an option to leave type). But maybe the migration seeds defaults? Not certain. Let me check the migration to see if default types inserted. Also docs maybe mention create form selects types from config; if config empty, no types exist → cannot create. The requirement stated in test step 4: "Criar autorização: Área e Tipo obrigatórios". There's no mention that pre-existing companies without config get defaults. This is a product decision; maybe admins need to set up config first. Could raise as a medium severity question regarding data/backward compatibility: For existing companies that never opened Configurações, after deploy their users won't be able to create/edit authorizations until an admin sets types (a new dependency). Given that no backfill exists (docs say old authorizations null), and no default types inserted? Let me check migration quickly.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "Version20260831143000"}
Result
File: docs/database-changes/2026-08-31-governance-authorization-config.md Match lines: 3 20|Arquivo: migrations/Version20260831143000_GovernanceAuthorizationConfig.php 25|Migration coberta: `Version20260831143000`. 58|Se o codigo novo ja estiver deployado, reverter so o schema quebra o save da aba Configuracoes. Preferir migration corretiva nova em vez de editar `Version20260831143000` ja aplicada. File: docs/database-changes/README.md Match lines: 1 63|- `2026-08-31-governance-authorization-config.md`: config de tipos/aprovadores de autorizacao e colunas `area_id`, `aprovador_member_id`, `tipo` em `member_autorizacao` (`Version20260831143000`). File: migrations/Version20260831143000_GovernanceAuthorizationConfig.php Match lines: 1 10|final class Version20260831143000_GovernanceAuthorizationConfig extends AbstractMigration
Request #113
deepseek-v4-flash
P:88.45K C:59 CR:88.19K CW:0
1444ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "migrations/Version20260831143000_GovernanceAuthorizationConfig.php"}
Result
File: migrations/Version20260831143000_GovernanceAuthorizationConfig.php (Total lines: 157)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-157
1|<?php
2|
3|declare(strict_types=1);
4|
5|namespace DoctrineMigrations;
6|
7|use Doctrine\DBAL\Schema\Schema;
8|use Doctrine\Migrations\AbstractMigration;
9|
10|final class Version20260831143000_GovernanceAuthorizationConfig extends AbstractMigration
11|{
12| public function getDescription(): string
13| {
14| return 'Cria a configuração normalizada de autorizações e adiciona área, aprovador e tipo em member_autorizacao.';
15| }
16|
17| public function up(Schema $schema): void
18| {
19| $schemaManager = $this->connection->createSchemaManager();
20|
21| if (!$schemaManager->tablesExist(['governance_authorization_config'])) {
22| $this->addSql("
23| CREATE TABLE governance_authorization_config (
24| id INT AUTO_INCREMENT NOT NULL,
25| company_id INT NOT NULL,
26| created_by_id INT DEFAULT NULL,
27| updated_by_id INT DEFAULT NULL,
28| use_members TINYINT(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT 1,
29| use_roles TINYINT(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
30| created_at DATETIME NOT NULL,
31| updated_at DATETIME DEFAULT NULL,
32| UNIQUE INDEX uniq_governance_authorization_config_company (company_id),
33| CONSTRAINT FK_GOV_AUTH_CONFIG_COMPANY FOREIGN KEY (company_id) REFERENCES company (id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
34| CONSTRAINT FK_GOV_AUTH_CONFIG_CREATED_BY FOREIGN KEY (created_by_id) REFERENCES user (id) ON DELETE SET NULL,
35| CONSTRAINT FK_GOV_AUTH_CONFIG_UPDATED_BY FOREIGN KEY (updated_by_id) REFERENCES user (id) ON DELETE SET NULL,
36| PRIMARY KEY(id)
37| ) DEFAULT CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 COLLATE `utf8mb4_unicode_ci` ENGINE = InnoDB
38| ");
39| }
40|
41| if (!$schemaManager->tablesExist(['governance_authorization_type'])) {
42| $this->addSql("
43| CREATE TABLE governance_authorization_type (
44| id INT AUTO_INCREMENT NOT NULL,
45| config_id INT NOT NULL,
46| label VARCHAR(80) NOT NULL,
47| position INT NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
48| UNIQUE INDEX uniq_gov_auth_type_config_label (config_id, label),
49| CONSTRAINT FK_GOV_AUTH_TYPE_CONFIG FOREIGN KEY (config_id) REFERENCES governance_authorization_config (id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
50| PRIMARY KEY(id)
51| ) DEFAULT CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 COLLATE `utf8mb4_unicode_ci` ENGINE = InnoDB
52| ");
53| }
54|
55| if (!$schemaManager->tablesExist(['governance_authorization_approver'])) {
56| $constraints = [
57| 'CONSTRAINT FK_GOV_AUTH_APPROVER_CONFIG FOREIGN KEY (config_id) REFERENCES governance_authorization_config (id) ON DELETE CASCADE',
58| ];
59| if ($schemaManager->tablesExist(['company_members'])) {
60| $constraints[] = 'CONSTRAINT FK_GOV_AUTH_APPROVER_MEMBER FOREIGN KEY (member_id) REFERENCES company_members (id) ON DELETE CASCADE';
61| }
62| if ($schemaManager->tablesExist(['roles'])) {
63| $constraints[] = 'CONSTRAINT FK_GOV_AUTH_APPROVER_ROLE FOREIGN KEY (role_id) REFERENCES roles (id) ON DELETE CASCADE';
64| }
65|
66| $this->addSql("
67| CREATE TABLE governance_authorization_approver (
68| id INT AUTO_INCREMENT NOT NULL,
69| config_id INT NOT NULL,
70| member_id INT DEFAULT NULL,
71| role_id INT DEFAULT NULL,
72| all_areas TINYINT(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT 1,
73| position INT NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
74| " . implode(",\n ", $constraints) . ",
75| PRIMARY KEY(id)
76| ) DEFAULT CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 COLLATE `utf8mb4_unicode_ci` ENGINE = InnoDB
77| ");
78| }
79|
80| if (!$schemaManager->tablesExist(['governance_authorization_approver_type'])) {
81| $this->addSql("
82| CREATE TABLE governance_authorization_approver_type (
83| approver_id INT NOT NULL,
84| type_id INT NOT NULL,
85| CONSTRAINT FK_GOV_AUTH_APPROVER_TYPE_APPROVER FOREIGN KEY (approver_id) REFERENCES governance_authorization_approver (id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
86| CONSTRAINT FK_GOV_AUTH_APPROVER_TYPE_TYPE FOREIGN KEY (type_id) REFERENCES governance_authorization_type (id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
87| PRIMARY KEY(approver_id, type_id)
88| ) DEFAULT CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 COLLATE `utf8mb4_unicode_ci` ENGINE = InnoDB
89| ");
90| }
91|
92| if (!$schemaManager->tablesExist(['member_autorizacao'])) {
93| return;
94| }
95|
96| $table = $schemaManager->introspectTable('member_autorizacao');
97|
98| if (!$table->hasColumn('area_id')) {
99| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE member_autorizacao ADD area_id INT DEFAULT NULL');
100| }
101| if ($schemaManager->tablesExist(['company_area']) && !$table->hasForeignKey('FK_MA_area')) {
102| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE member_autorizacao ADD CONSTRAINT FK_MA_area FOREIGN KEY (area_id) REFERENCES company_area (id) ON DELETE SET NULL');
103| }
104|
105| if (!$table->hasColumn('aprovador_member_id')) {
106| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE member_autorizacao ADD aprovador_member_id INT DEFAULT NULL');
107| }
108| if ($schemaManager->tablesExist(['company_members']) && !$table->hasForeignKey('FK_MA_aprovador')) {
109| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE member_autorizacao ADD CONSTRAINT FK_MA_aprovador FOREIGN KEY (aprovador_member_id) REFERENCES company_members (id) ON DELETE SET NULL');
110| }
111|
112| if (!$table->hasColumn('tipo')) {
113| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE member_autorizacao ADD tipo VARCHAR(255) DEFAULT NULL');
114| }
115| }
116|
117| public function down(Schema $schema): void
118| {
119| $schemaManager = $this->connection->createSchemaManager();
120|
121| if ($schemaManager->tablesExist(['member_autorizacao'])) {
122| $table = $schemaManager->introspectTable('member_autorizacao');
123|
124| if ($table->hasForeignKey('FK_MA_aprovador')) {
125| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE member_autorizacao DROP FOREIGN KEY FK_MA_aprovador');
126| }
127| if ($table->hasColumn('aprovador_member_id')) {
128| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE member_autorizacao DROP COLUMN aprovador_member_id');
129| }
130|
131| if ($table->hasForeignKey('FK_MA_area')) {
132| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE member_autorizacao DROP FOREIGN KEY FK_MA_area');
133| }
134| if ($table->hasColumn('area_id')) {
135| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE member_autorizacao DROP COLUMN area_id');
136| }
137|
138| if ($table->hasColumn('tipo')) {
139| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE member_autorizacao DROP COLUMN tipo');
140| }
141| }
142|
143| if ($schemaManager->tablesExist(['governance_authorization_approver_type'])) {
144| $this->addSql('DROP TABLE governance_authorization_approver_type');
145| }
146| if ($schemaManager->tablesExist(['governance_authorization_approver'])) {
147| $this->addSql('DROP TABLE governance_authorization_approver');
148| }
149| if ($schemaManager->tablesExist(['governance_authorization_type'])) {
150| $this->addSql('DROP TABLE governance_authorization_type');
151| }
152| if ($schemaManager->tablesExist(['governance_authorization_config'])) {
153| $this->addSql('DROP TABLE governance_authorization_config');
154| }
155| }
156|}
157|
Request #114
deepseek-v4-flash
P:90.6K C:1.18K CR:88.45K CW:0
10528ms
Reasoning
The migration doesn't seed defaults; types are only config-driven. So a company that never opens Configurações has zero types; then create modal's tipo dropdown is empty and required. Users can't create an authorization. This is likely by design? But given that the docs say "no backfill" and types are required in form, this means the feature effectively blocks creation for companies without configuration. Might be worth flagging as a business-flow gap, but the scope of the PR intentionally introduces config-driven types. There's maybe an admin flow to first set types. Given PR description: "Tipos do select de criação vêm da Configuração" and test instructions require setting types in Configurações first before creating authorization. The test steps: step 2 adds types, step 4 creates authorization. So this is intended flow; creating before any config is not tested/specified. It's a product risk but might be acceptable.
Given many confirmed findings, I should surface only issues that are genuinely new and impactful. Let me re-read the checklist for the review prompt: they want "regressões funcionais, segurança, isolamento por empresa, integridade de dados, migrations, testes".
Since these backend/migration things are outside review files, our code comments must target review files.
Let me check a possible logic issue that I noticed earlier: settings template: `initialTypes`, `initialApproverMembers`, `initialApproverRoles` assigned with `{{ ...|default([])|json_encode|raw }}`. JSON of `list<array{id,name,all_areas,area_keys}>`: area_keys arrays of strings; fine.
Now consider hydration when **approver row area keys reference a type whose case differs from chip label**: createChip stores data-area-key original label. `setRowAreas(row, allAreas=false, keys)`. `fillAreaSelect` marks selectedKeys based on labelKey from data-area-key, so types in select hidden even if case differs slightly; equal case-insensitive. fine.
What about **all_areas false rows where area keys were already removed from types**: they still appear with chips but not selectable; on save server would validate unknown area key? Wait if a row references an area key no longer in types because type chip removed: When a type chip is removed, `typeChips` click handler calls `syncAllApproverAreaSelects()`, which for each restricted row filters to allowed keys; keys no longer present removed, and if kept empty row becomes all areas. But what if a user adds a type chip with same label that a restricted row already had? No.
The row area chips are stored in the settings' approver row. Good.
Now let me double check the **settings filter display** when picking member via filter by cargo etc. After filter applied and checkbox select-all used: they only toggle visible rows. Good.
Let me check `applyPickerFilters` also called on `pickerSearch` 'input' event. But it's also called from `resetPickerFilters`? not needed.
Now, notice: `pickerFilterTeam` options built from member.team_names reduce concat, but pickerMatchesFilters compares normalized team to each name via labelKey. Good.
Now, let's inspect the top part of settings template (lines 1-100 markup) for the approver section and flags; maybe a bug: `<input type="checkbox" id="govAuthApproverUseMembers"...>` plus label inside option card. Card id `govAuthApproverMembersOption`. bindOptionCard binds card click; toggling checkbox; but because there is a label with `for=govAuthApproverUseMembers`, clicking the label text triggers the checkbox's native behavior AND bubbles to the card? In bindOptionCard, card click handler: `if (event.target === checkbox || event.target.tagName === 'LABEL') return;`. Clicking label tag returns early, so no double toggle. Clicking checkbox itself also returns early (target===checkbox). But there's a subtle problem: clicking the checkbox triggers native change event (bubbles) which triggers syncApproverMode. Clicking label triggers native change too. Good. Clicking the card background (padding) toggles checkbox via handler and dispatches change. Good.
Alright.
Let me reconsider a strong candidate: **settings save response mapping mismatch**:
persist uses `res.authorization_types`, `res.approver_members`. Server returns those keys (plus use flags). OK.
`ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes` param expected array labels. Server returns list of strings. Good.
Now something else: In the settings partial there's this function declaration on create file:
```
window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers = function () {
};
```
Called with `res.approver_members` — confirmed.
Alright.
Let me look more carefully for a bug in the settings markup area 160-260. Let me read those lines to ensure the labels' `for`/ids are consistent and that elements required by JS exist. Also verify `membersBtn` is an actual button not anchor to check event default preventDefault is missing? If button inside a form? It's in div not form. OK.
Let me quickly read the markup lines 100-260.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 360, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig", "start_line": 120}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig (Total lines: 1224)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 120-360
120| white-space: nowrap;
121|}
122|
123|.gov-auth-approver-list {
124| display: flex;
125| flex-direction: column;
126| gap: 12px;
127| margin-top: 12px;
128|}
129|
130|.gov-auth-approver-row {
131| display: flex;
132| flex-direction: column;
133| align-items: flex-start;
134| gap: 8px;
135|}
136|
137|.gov-auth-approver-row__areas {
138| display: flex;
139| flex-wrap: wrap;
140| align-items: center;
141| gap: 8px;
142| width: 100%;
143|}
144|
145|.gov-auth-approver-area-select {
146| min-height: 28px;
147| height: 28px;
148| padding: 0 10px;
149| border: 1px solid #d1d5db;
150| border-radius: 999px;
151| background: #fff;
152| font-size: 13px;
153| color: #5c5d5d;
154| cursor: pointer;
155|}
156|
157|.gov-auth-settings-options {
158| display: flex;
159| flex-wrap: wrap;
160| gap: 12px;
161| margin-bottom: 16px;
162|}
163|
164|.gov-auth-settings-option {
165| display: flex;
166| align-items: center;
167| gap: 8px;
168| padding: 10px 14px;
169| border: 1px solid rgba(30, 30, 30, 0.12);
170| border-radius: 8px;
171| background: #fff;
172| cursor: pointer;
173| user-select: none;
174|}
175|
176|.gov-auth-settings-option:hover {
177| border-color: color-mix(in srgb, var(--app-brand-primary, #186073) 40%, transparent);
178|}
179|
180|.gov-auth-settings-option.is-active {
181| border-color: var(--app-brand-primary, #186073);
182|}
183|
184|.gov-auth-settings-option input[type="checkbox"] {
185| width: 16px;
186| height: 16px;
187| margin: 0;
188| accent-color: var(--app-brand-primary, #186073);
189| cursor: pointer;
190| flex-shrink: 0;
191|}
192|
193|.gov-auth-settings-option label {
194| margin: 0;
195| font-size: 13px;
196| font-weight: 500;
197| color: #1e1e1e;
198| cursor: pointer;
199| white-space: nowrap;
200|}
201|
202|.gov-auth-settings-open-wrap {
203| display: block;
204| width: 100%;
205|}
206|
207|.gov-auth-settings-open-wrap + .gov-auth-settings-open-wrap {
208| margin-top: 12px;
209|}
210|
211|.gov-auth-settings-open-btn {
212| display: inline-flex;
213| align-items: center;
214| justify-content: center;
215| gap: 8px;
216| width: 100%;
217| min-height: 42px;
218| padding: 8px 16px;
219| border: 1px solid #d1d5db;
220| border-radius: 8px;
221| background: #fff;
222| color: #1e1e1e;
223| font-size: 14px;
224| font-weight: 500;
225| line-height: 1.2;
226| cursor: pointer;
227| box-sizing: border-box;
228|}
229|
230|.gov-auth-settings-open-btn i {
231| font-size: 12px;
232| color: var(--app-brand-primary, #186073);
233|}
234|</style>
235|
236|<div class="members-content p-3 gov-auth-settings-content" id="governance_auth_settings_content">
237| <section class="gov-auth-settings-section" aria-labelledby="govAuthSettingsTypesTitle">
238| <h2 id="govAuthSettingsTypesTitle" class="gov-auth-settings-section__title">Tipos de autorização</h2>
239| <p class="gov-auth-settings-section__description">
240| Organize as autorizações por área responsável ou contexto de aplicação.
241| </p>
242|
243| <input type="text"
244| id="govAuthTypeInput"
245| class="form-control gov-auth-settings-types__input"
246| placeholder="Escreva para adicionar um tipo"
247| autocomplete="off"
248| maxlength="80"
249| aria-label="Adicionar tipo de autorização">
250|
251| <div class="gov-auth-settings-chips" id="govAuthTypeChips" role="list"></div>
252| </section>
253|
254| <hr class="gov-auth-settings-divider">
255|
256| <section class="gov-auth-settings-section" aria-labelledby="govAuthSettingsApproversTitle">
257| <h2 id="govAuthSettingsApproversTitle" class="gov-auth-settings-section__title">Aprovadores padrão de autorizações</h2>
258| <p class="gov-auth-settings-section__description">
259| Defina membros ou cargos que poderão aprovar autorizações. Cada um começa em Todas as Áreas e pode ser limitado a tipos específicos.
260| </p>
261|
262| <div class="gov-auth-settings-options">
263| <div class="gov-auth-settings-option{% if govAuthUseMembers %} is-active{% endif %}" id="govAuthApproverMembersOption" role="button">
264| <input type="checkbox" id="govAuthApproverUseMembers"{% if govAuthUseMembers %} checked{% endif %}>
265| <label for="govAuthApproverUseMembers">Membros</label>
266| </div>
267| <div class="gov-auth-settings-option{% if govAuthUseRoles %} is-active{% endif %}" id="govAuthApproverRolesOption" role="button">
268| <input type="checkbox" id="govAuthApproverUseRoles"{% if govAuthUseRoles %} checked{% endif %}>
269| <label for="govAuthApproverUseRoles">Cargos</label>
270| </div>
271| </div>
272|
273| <div class="gov-auth-settings-open-wrap{% if not govAuthUseMembers %} d-none{% endif %}" id="govAuthApproverMembersWrap">
274| <button type="button" class="gov-auth-settings-open-btn" id="govAuthApproverMembersBtn">
275| <i class="fas fa-plus" aria-hidden="true"></i>
276| Adicionar membros
277| </button>
278| </div>
279|
280| <div class="gov-auth-settings-open-wrap{% if not govAuthUseRoles %} d-none{% endif %}" id="govAuthApproverRolesWrap">
281| <button type="button" class="gov-auth-settings-open-btn" id="govAuthApproverRolesBtn">
282| <i class="fas fa-plus" aria-hidden="true"></i>
283| Adicionar cargos
284| </button>
285| </div>
286|
287| <div class="gov-auth-approver-list" id="govAuthApproverList"></div>
288| </section>
289|</div>
290|
291|{% include 'governance/authorization/partials/_modal_add_approver.html.twig' %}
292|
293|<script>
294|(function () {
295| var SAVE_URL = {{ path('governance_authorization_config_save')|json_encode|raw }};
296| var ALL_AREAS_VALUE = '__all__';
297| var ALL_AREAS_LABEL = 'Todas as Áreas';
298| var initialTypes = {{ aut_authorization_types|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
299| var initialApproverMembers = {{ aut_authorization_approver_members|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
300| var initialApproverRoles = {{ aut_authorization_approver_roles|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
301|
302| var typeInput = document.getElementById('govAuthTypeInput');
303| var typeChips = document.getElementById('govAuthTypeChips');
304| var approverList = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverList');
305| var membersOption = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverMembersOption');
306| var rolesOption = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverRolesOption');
307| var useMembers = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverUseMembers');
308| var useRoles = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverUseRoles');
309| var membersWrap = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverMembersWrap');
310| var rolesWrap = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverRolesWrap');
311| var membersBtn = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverMembersBtn');
312| var rolesBtn = document.getElementById('govAuthApproverRolesBtn');
313| var pickerBody = document.getElementById('govAuthPickerBody');
314| var pickerSearch = document.getElementById('govAuthPickerSearch');
315| var pickerFilters = document.getElementById('govAuthPickerFilters');
316| var pickerFilterCargo = document.getElementById('govAuthPickerFilterCargo');
317| var pickerFilterTeam = document.getElementById('govAuthPickerFilterTeam');
318| var pickerFilterBond = document.getElementById('govAuthPickerFilterBond');
319| var pickerCheckAll = document.getElementById('govAuthPickerCheckAll');
320| var pickerSubmit = document.getElementById('govAuthPickerSubmit');
321| var catalogMembers = {{ allMembers|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
322| var catalogRoles = {{ aut_company_roles|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
323| var pickerKind = 'member';
324| var skipSave = true;
325| var saveTimer = null;
326| var saveSeq = 0;
327| var AVATAR_COLORS = ['#E85D4C', '#2F4A6E', '#3D9B6E', '#3B82F6', '#8B5CF6', '#F59E0B'];
328| var BOND_LABELS = { clt: 'CLT', terceiro: 'Terceiro' };
329|
330| function normalizeLabel(value) {
331| return String(value || '').replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim();
332| }
333|
334| function labelKey(value) {
335| return normalizeLabel(value).toLowerCase();
336| }
337|
338| function currentTypes() {
339| return collectChipLabels(typeChips);
340| }
341|
342| function createChip(label, key, extraAttrs, removable) {
343| var chip = document.createElement('span');
344| chip.className = 'gov-auth-settings-chip';
345| chip.setAttribute('role', 'listitem');
346| chip.setAttribute('data-type', key || labelKey(label));
347| if (extraAttrs) {
348| Object.keys(extraAttrs).forEach(function (name) {
349| if (extraAttrs[name] != null && extraAttrs[name] !== '') {
350| chip.setAttribute(name, extraAttrs[name]);
351| }
352| });
353| }
354| if (removable !== false) {
355| var removeBtn = document.createElement('button');
356| removeBtn.type = 'button';
357| removeBtn.className = 'gov-auth-settings-chip__remove';
358| removeBtn.setAttribute('aria-label', 'Remover ' + label);
359| removeBtn.innerHTML = '<i class="fas fa-times" aria-hidden="true"></i>';
360| chip.appendChild(removeBtn);
Request #115
deepseek-v4-flash
P:94.62K C:361 CR:91.78K CW:0
4134ms
Reasoning
Now I realize one genuine UI logic bug candidate that is fairly concrete: when `govAuthUseRoles` initial false but `initialApproverRoles` contains roles — the JS still hydrates role rows and shows them under the "Aprovadores padrão" list even though the "Cargos" flag is off. This might be intentional (rows preserved even while disabled, as backend persists them). But then when the user toggles Cargos off (say it was on, and user has roles rows), rows remain visible, no change. And they persist; toggle off won't remove roles. Backend saves only rows present. So turning Cargos off just hides add button, but existing rows remain; role approvals would presumably still be valid? Actually resolveUseFlags/use_roles maybe controls whether role approvers are considered? Backend stores config. If use_roles false but rows persisted, when a new authorization is created it uses aprovadores padrão das Configurações maybe includes role approvers regardless of the flag? The flag probably filters which approvers eligible. Not verifiable from template.
Let me check backend to determine if use_roles false means saved role rows ignored; check where approver resolution uses usesRoles. Search service uses of usesRoles or usesMembers in authorization flow.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "usesMembers|usesRoles|use_members|use_roles", "file_patterns": ["src/Service/Governance/*.php", "src/Entity/Governance*.php"]}
Result
No matches found
Request #116
deepseek-v4-flash
P:95K C:61 CR:94.98K CW:0
1674ms
Reasoning
Let me search the Governance dir broader.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "usesRoles|usesMembers|use_roles"}
Result
No matches found
Request #117
deepseek-v4-flash
P:95.08K C:246 CR:94.98K CW:0
2912ms
Reasoning
Search case-insensitive maybe... Hmm results empty is odd since I saw method usages `usesMembers()` and `usesRoles()` at service lines 45-46, 106-107. So earlier search (with `|`) maybe the `|` alternation caused problem? Wait I did `search_text: "usesMembers|usesRoles|use_members|use_roles"` (plain string search should match literal "usesMembers|..."?). Oh - code_search's `search_text` is literal unless use_perl_regexp. So alternation didn't act as regex. I need regex mode for alternation. Let me use regex to find usage of usesRoles/usesMembers across service and entity, to understand whether use_roles=false with stored rows matters.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "usesMembers|usesRoles|getUseMembers|getUseRoles|use_roles|use_members", "use_perl_regexp": true}
Result
Note: The results have been truncated. Only showing first 100 results.
File: migrations/Version20260831143000_GovernanceAuthorizationConfig.php
Match lines: 2
28| use_members TINYINT(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT 1,
29| use_roles TINYINT(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
File: src/Controller/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigController.php
Match lines: 4
44| 'use_members' => $view['aut_authorization_use_members'],
45| 'use_roles' => $view['aut_authorization_use_roles'],
83| 'use_members' => $data['use_members'],
84| 'use_roles' => $data['use_roles'],
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 3
18566| $useMembers = array_key_exists('use_members', $body)
18567| ? (bool) $body['use_members']
18568| : (bool) $config['use_members'];
File: src/Entity/GovernanceAuthorizationConfig.php
Match lines: 4
40| * @ORM\Column(name="use_members", type="boolean", options={"default": true})
45| * @ORM\Column(name="use_roles", type="boolean", options={"default": false})
128| public function usesMembers(): bool
140| public function usesRoles(): bool
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQuery.php
Match lines: 6
22| * aut_authorization_use_members: bool,
23| * aut_authorization_use_roles: bool,
34| 'aut_authorization_use_members' => true,
35| 'aut_authorization_use_roles' => false,
46| * aut_authorization_use_members: bool,
47| * aut_authorization_use_roles: bool,
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigService.php
Match lines: 12
33| * aut_authorization_use_members: bool,
34| * aut_authorization_use_roles: bool,
45| $hasConfig ? $config->usesMembers() : true,
46| $hasConfig ? $config->usesRoles() : false,
51| 'aut_authorization_use_members' => $useMembers,
52| 'aut_authorization_use_roles' => $useRoles,
64| * use_members: bool,
65| * use_roles: bool,
74| $this->normalizeBoolean($payload['use_members'] ?? true, 'use_members'),
75| $this->normalizeBoolean($payload['use_roles'] ?? false, 'use_roles'),
106| 'use_members' => $config->usesMembers(),
107| 'use_roles' => $config->usesRoles(),
File: src/Service/SafetyEnvironmentService.php
Match lines: 1
786| if (!empty($group['use_members'])) {
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaActionTypeConfigService.php
Match lines: 6
144| 'use_members' => true,
146| 'use_roles' => false,
152| 'use_members' => true,
154| 'use_roles' => false,
172| 'use_members' => !empty($group['use_members']),
174| 'use_roles' => !empty($group['use_roles']),
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaMetaAbonoService.php
Match lines: 2
40| /** @return array{approver_ids: list<int>, use_members: bool, use_direct_manager: bool} */
45| 'use_members' => $this->typeConfig->getMetaAbonoUseMembers($company),
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaOccurrenceTypeConfigService.php
Match lines: 2
921| $stored['meta_abono_use_members'] = $useMembers;
932| $raw = $stored['meta_abono_use_members'] ?? null;
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig
Match lines: 4
5|{% set govAuthUseMembers = aut_authorization_use_members|default(true) %}
6|{% set govAuthUseRoles = aut_authorization_use_roles|default(false) %}
557| use_members: !!(useMembers && useMembers.checked),
558| use_roles: !!(useRoles && useRoles.checked),
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_action_plan_config.html.twig
Match lines: 30
200| <div class="ssma-vc-option d-flex align-items-center rounded p-2 bg-white {{ _vc_dv.use_members|default(true) ? 'active' : '' }}"
202| <input type="checkbox" id="vc_dv_use_members" class="vc-group-check mr-2"
204| {{ _vc_dv.use_members|default(true) ? 'checked' : '' }}>
205| <label for="vc_dv_use_members" class="mb-0">Membros</label>
214| <div class="ssma-vc-option d-flex align-items-center rounded p-2 bg-white {{ _vc_dv.use_roles|default(false) ? 'active' : '' }}"
216| <input type="checkbox" id="vc_dv_use_roles" class="vc-group-check mr-2"
218| {{ _vc_dv.use_roles|default(false) ? 'checked' : '' }}>
219| <label for="vc_dv_use_roles" class="mb-0">Cargos</label>
223| <div id="vc_dv_members_wrap" class="{{ not _vc_dv.use_members|default(true) ? 'd-none' : '' }} ssma-vc-field mb-3">
239| <div id="vc_dv_roles_wrap" class="{{ not _vc_dv.use_roles|default(false) ? 'd-none' : '' }} ssma-vc-field mb-3">
256| <div class="ssma-vc-option d-flex align-items-center rounded p-2 bg-white {{ _vc_cl.use_members|default(true) ? 'active' : '' }}"
258| <input type="checkbox" id="vc_cl_use_members" class="vc-group-check mr-2"
260| {{ _vc_cl.use_members|default(true) ? 'checked' : '' }}>
261| <label for="vc_cl_use_members" class="mb-0">Membros</label>
270| <div class="ssma-vc-option d-flex align-items-center rounded p-2 bg-white {{ _vc_cl.use_roles|default(false) ? 'active' : '' }}"
272| <input type="checkbox" id="vc_cl_use_roles" class="vc-group-check mr-2"
274| {{ _vc_cl.use_roles|default(false) ? 'checked' : '' }}>
275| <label for="vc_cl_use_roles" class="mb-0">Cargos</label>
279| <div id="vc_cl_members_wrap" class="{{ not _vc_cl.use_members|default(true) ? 'd-none' : '' }} ssma-vc-field mb-3">
295| <div id="vc_cl_roles_wrap" class="{{ not _vc_cl.use_roles|default(false) ? 'd-none' : '' }} ssma-vc-field mb-3">
426| use_members: {{ _vc_dv.use_members|default(true) ? 'true' : 'false' }},
428| use_roles: {{ _vc_dv.use_roles|default(false) ? 'true' : 'false' }},
434| use_members: {{ _vc_cl.use_members|default(true) ? 'true' : 'false' }},
436| use_roles: {{ _vc_cl.use_roles|default(false) ? 'true' : 'false' }},
542| document.getElementById(prefix + 'members_wrap').classList.toggle('d-none', !g.use_members);
544| document.getElementById(prefix + 'roles_wrap').classList.toggle('d-none', !g.use_roles);
555| use_members: vcState.dv.use_members,
557| use_roles: vcState.dv.use_roles,
563| use_members: vcState.cl.use_members,
565| use_roles: vcState.cl.use_roles,
File: templates/ssma/partials/_modal_action.html.twig
Match lines: 1
2088| if (group.use_members && Array.isArray(group.member_ids)) {
File: templates/ssma/prevention/tabs/_tab_prevention_config.html.twig
Match lines: 9
888| use_members: true,
1792| var useMembers = abonoApproversState.use_members;
1811| abonoApproversState.use_members = !!res.use_members;
1825| if (!abonoApproversState.use_members && !abonoApproversState.use_direct_manager) {
1828| if (abonoApproversState.use_members
1858| use_members: abonoApproversState.use_members,
2078| abonoApproversState.use_members = $('#ssmaAbonoApproversUseMembers').is(':checked');
2080| if (!abonoApproversState.use_members && !abonoApproversState.use_direct_manager) {
2081| abonoApproversState.use_members = true;
File: tests/Unit/Product/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigControllerTest.php
Match lines: 7
92| 'use_members' => 'talvez',
96| self::assertSame('Campo booleano inválido: use_members.', $this->decode($response)['message']);
125| 'use_roles' => true,
142| 'use_members' => true,
143| 'use_roles' => true,
163| self::assertTrue($config->usesMembers());
164| self::assertTrue($config->usesRoles());
File: tests/Unit/Product/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationConfigHubQueryTest.php
Match lines: 1
31| self::assertTrue($view['aut_authorization_use_members']);
File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaMetaAbonoServiceTest.php
Match lines: 10
33| 'meta_abono_use_members' => false,
51| 'meta_abono_use_members' => true,
61| 'meta_abono_use_members' => true,
74| 'meta_abono_use_members' => true,
87| 'meta_abono_use_members' => true,
103| 'meta_abono_use_members' => true,
118| 'meta_abono_use_members' => true,
211| 'meta_abono_use_members' => true,
272| 'meta_abono_use_members' => false,
305| self::assertTrue($stored['meta_abono_use_members']);
File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaOccurrenceTypeConfigServiceTest.php
Match lines: 2
324| self::assertTrue($stored['meta_abono_use_members']);
390| self::assertFalse($stored['meta_abono_use_members']);
Request #118
deepseek-v4-flash
P:97.98K C:1.05K CR:95.23K CW:0
9998ms
Reasoning
Not enough to confirm whether the role rows visible when the roles flag is off is a bug. There is a pre-existing SSMA config pattern (`_tab_action_plan_config.html.twig`) with same flags, likely hides only add-buttons and keeps saved lists visible. So not necessarily a bug.
Now I've been exhaustive; but I still need at least a couple of new genuine findings not overlapping the confirmed list, if real. Let me reconsider carefully for **new** issues:
### Candidate: Type label used as `data-value`/option values could be a weird string; not really.
### Candidate: Search icon is `<i>` without aria-hidden inside label? fine.
### Candidate: Autosave sends JSON `payload` with all fields. CSRF absence already noted. No repeat.
### Candidate: Company isolation by templates: none.
### Candidate: In the settings picker, the role catalog comes from aut_company_roles, but if a role is assigned in config and not present in aut_company_roles (e.g., removed role), then the approver row for role still hydrated (name fallback), but picker excludes the role and hasApproverRow check uses settings list not catalog so existing role remains in list. Fine.
### Candidate: In `fillAreaSelect` disabled attribute for area select when no types: `select.disabled = types.length===0`. In approver area selects, disabled prevents opening. good.
### Candidate issue: When approver area chips removed via row click handler: `chip.remove(); var kept = collectAreaKeys(row); setRowAreas(row, kept.length===0, kept);` - if kept empty becomes all areas -> the row's all-area chip (ALL_AREAS_LABEL non-removable) is shown. Good.
### Candidate: In picker body click remove chip: after removal, `setPickerRowAreas(row, false, collectAreaKeys(row), true)` — wait they pass allAreas=false always, even when collectAreaKeys returns empty. But setPickerRowAreas handles empty -> all areas true. Good. keepSelectOpen true keeps select editing open even after it returns all areas; row becomes non-limited but is-editing. Blur closes. Slight oddity: after removing the last chip, the select remains open showing options though the row is all areas again; a stray change selecting something will re-restrict. Acceptable.
### Candidate: Row pill text: clicking pill opens editing. But if row is all areas and user hasn't selected it, this is fine.
Now let me carefully examine a real front-end bug: **`fillFilterSelect`** uses `.some` on select.options referencing the live collection while `select.innerHTML=''` modifies. That happens after rebuilding. fine.
### Candidate: When pickerKind switches from member to role, `renderPickerRows` excludes members already added as approver roles? no.
### Candidate: search query normalization for picker uses lowercase without locale; fine.
### Candidate: In `syncApproverMode`, when both flags are unchecked, they set members checked but don't re-render the "Adicionar cargos"/"Adicionar membros" wrap appropriately? They do toggle wraps based on membersOn/rolesOn; membersOn becomes true; so Members wrap shown, Roles wrap hidden. Good.
### Candidate bug in settings JS: After forcing membersOn, they don't dispatch change to checkboxes but toggled classes/wraps; scheduleSave eventually persists payload with useMembers true and useRoles false. fine.
Hmm, let me re-inspect the create JS around the DataTable row action buttons in the changed area to confirm the eye button unconditional, plus handlers js-aut-criar-visualizar vs js-aut-criar-editar. Since the eye now appears even if ssmaCanEditAuthorization? Actually the permission to view authorization (visualizar) may need only canAccess; the create tab gating is based on ssmaCanCreateAuthorization. Wait but actions previously all under ssmaCanCreateAuthorization: if a user could access the tab (ssmaCanCreateAuthorization true) but lacked e.g. edit permission, still previously showed edit? There were inner checks for edit permission probably in the omitted code. Let me look at the diff hunk again: In the new code, autActionsCell is built and the `{% if ssmaCanCreateAuthorization|default(false) %}` wraps the merge of pen, plus maybe edit/delete actions with their own permission checks (ssmaCanManageConfig etc). Let me read the current file lines 755-830.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 860, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig", "start_line": 700}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig (Total lines: 2423)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 700-860
700| {% set isAtivaTbl = aut.status_real|default('') == 'ativa' %}
701| {% set validadeTbl = aut.validade_exibicao|default('Indefinida') %}
702| {% set reqsTbl = aut.requisitos|default([]) %}
703| {% set responsavelTbl = aut.responsavel|default(null) %}
704| {% set responsavelNomeTbl = responsavelTbl.name|default('')|trim %}
705| {% set responsavelAvatarTbl = responsavelTbl.avatar|default('')|trim %}
706|
707| {% set autTitleCell %}
708| <span class="governance-auth-table-title">{{ aut.titulo }}</span>
709| {% endset %}
710|
711| {% set autStatusCell %}
712| <span class="mhs-pill mhs-pill--sm mhs-pill--{{ isAtivaTbl ? 'green' : 'gray' }} governance-auth-status-pill">
713| <span class="mhs-pill-label">{{ isAtivaTbl ? 'Ativa' : 'Inativa' }}</span>
714| </span>
715| {% endset %}
716|
717| {% set autReqsCell %}
718| {% if reqsTbl|length > 0 %}
719| <div class="governance-auth-card__tags" style="margin:0;">
720| {% for req in reqsTbl|slice(0, 2) %}
721| <span class="mhs-pill mhs-pill--sm mhs-pill--teal governance-auth-card__tag" title="{{ req|e('html_attr') }}">
722| <span class="mhs-pill-label">{{ req }}</span>
723| </span>
724| {% endfor %}
725| {% if reqsTbl|length > 2 %}
726| <span class="mhs-pill mhs-pill--sm mhs-pill--teal governance-auth-card__tag governance-auth-card__tag--more"
727| title="{{ reqsTbl|slice(2)|join(', ')|e('html_attr') }}">
728| <span class="mhs-pill-label">+{{ reqsTbl|length - 2 }}</span>
729| </span>
730| {% endif %}
731| </div>
732| {% else %}
733| <span class="text-muted">—</span>
734| {% endif %}
735| {% endset %}
736|
737| {% set autResponsibleCell %}
738| {% if responsavelNomeTbl %}
739| <span class="governance-auth-table-responsible" title="{{ responsavelNomeTbl|e('html_attr') }}">
740| <span class="governance-auth-table-responsible__avatar">
741| {% if responsavelAvatarTbl %}
742| <img src="{{ asset('uploads/photos/' ~ responsavelAvatarTbl) }}"
743| alt=""
744| role="presentation"
745| style="width:100%;height:100%;object-fit:cover;border-radius:999px;"
746| onerror="this.style.display='none';this.nextElementSibling.style.display='inline-flex';">
747| <span style="display:none;">{{ responsavelNomeTbl|first|upper }}</span>
748| {% else %}
749| {{ responsavelNomeTbl|first|upper }}
750| {% endif %}
751| </span>
752| <span class="governance-auth-table-responsible__name">{{ responsavelNomeTbl }}</span>
753| </span>
754| {% else %}
755| <span class="text-muted">—</span>
756| {% endif %}
757| {% endset %}
758|
759| {% set autActionsCell = [
760| {
761| type: 'button',
762| icon: 'fa-regular fa-eye',
763| class: 'btn-default btn-sm ssma-aqc-table-action-btn js-aut-criar-visualizar',
764| url: '#',
765| attributes: {
766| 'data-aut-id': aut.id,
767| 'data-toggle': 'tooltip',
768| 'data-container': 'body',
769| 'data-boundary': 'viewport',
770| 'title': 'Visualizar autorização'
771| }
772| }
773| ] %}
774| {% if ssmaCanCreateAuthorization|default(false) %}
775| {% set autActionsCell = autActionsCell|merge([
776| {
777| type: 'button',
778| icon: 'fa-regular fa-pen',
779| class: 'btn-default btn-sm ssma-aqc-table-action-btn ssma-aqc-edit-btn js-aut-criar-editar',
780| url: '#',
781| attributes: {
782| 'data-aut-id': aut.id,
783| 'data-aut': aut|json_encode|e('html_attr'),
784| 'data-toggle': 'tooltip',
785| 'data-container': 'body',
786| 'data-boundary': 'viewport',
787| 'title': 'Editar autorização'
788| }
789| },
790| {
791| type: 'dropdown',
792| items: [
793| {
794| label: isAtivaTbl ? 'Inativar autorização' : 'Reativar autorização',
795| icon: 'fas fa-tag mr-2',
796| class: 'js-aut-criar-toggle-status',
797| url: '#',
798| attributes: {
799| 'data-aut-id': aut.id,
800| 'data-aut-active': isAtivaTbl ? '1' : '0'
801| }
802| },
803| {
804| label: 'Deletar autorização',
805| icon: 'fas fa-trash-alt mr-2',
806| class: 'text-danger js-aut-criar-remover',
807| url: '#',
808| attributes: {
809| 'data-aut-id': aut.id,
810| 'data-aut-titulo': aut.titulo|e('html_attr'),
811| 'data-aut-status': aut.status_real|default('')|e('html_attr')
812| }
813| }
814| ]
815| }
816| ]) %}
817| {% endif %}
818|
819| {% set autTableRows = autTableRows|merge([{
820| 'id': aut.id,
821| 'titulo': autTitleCell|trim,
822| 'requisitos': autReqsCell|trim,
823| 'validade': validadeTbl,
824| 'status': autStatusCell|trim,
825| 'responsavel': autResponsibleCell|trim,
826| 'Ações': autActionsCell,
827| '_aut-status': aut.status_real|default('')|e('html_attr'),
828| '_aut-reqs': aut.requisitos|default([])|join('|')|lower|e('html_attr')
829| }]) %}
830| {% endfor %}
831|
832| <div id="autAuthorizationsTableWrapper">
833| {% include 'components/ui/_dynamic_table.html.twig' with {
834| table_id: 'authorizations-table',
835| headers: autTableHeaders,
836| rows: autTableRows,
837| empty_message: 'Nenhuma autorização cadastrada.',
838| datatable_options: {
839| 'ordering': true,
840| 'pageLength': 10,
841| 'order': [[0, 'asc']],
842| 'responsive': false,
843| 'autoWidth': false,
844| 'language': {
845| 'emptyTable': 'Nenhuma autorização cadastrada.',
846| 'zeroRecords': 'Nenhuma autorização encontrada',
847| 'lengthMenu': 'Resultados por página _MENU_',
848| 'info': 'Mostrando _END_ de _TOTAL_ autorizações',
849| 'infoEmpty': 'Mostrando 0 de 0 autorizações',
850| 'infoFiltered': '(filtrado de _MAX_ autorizações)'
851| },
852| 'columnDefs': [
853| {'orderable': false, 'targets': [5]},
854| {'className': 'text-center', 'targets': [2, 3]},
855| {'className': 'text-center', 'targets': [5]},
856| {'width': '18%', 'targets': [0]},
857| {'width': '24%', 'targets': [1]},
858| {'width': '11%', 'targets': [2]},
859| {'width': '11%', 'targets': [3]},
860| {'width': '18%', 'targets': [4]},
Request #119
deepseek-v4-flash
P:101.11K C:1.75K CR:98.94K CW:0
15067ms
Reasoning
OK.
Now I need to decide on final comments to add that are new (not in confirmed findings). Let me think about what is most valuable:
**New issue 1 (real functional): Tab `Configurações` may be rendered but its data variables missing in one controller** — but that's speculative about a second controller being in use; skip.
**New issue 2**: In `_modal_authorization_form.html.twig`, `aut_modal_area_options`, `aut_modal_aprovador_options`, `aut_modal_aprovador_role_options` are built every time the modal partial is included, duplicating the full member list twice (responsavel + aprovador selects) with a full scan of allMembers for each select: performance. But more importantly the HTML now embeds the entire `allMembers` list **twice** into the modal (responsavel select + aprovador select) + catalogMembers JSON + etc. For large companies this is heavy but not catastrophic. Pre-existing pattern already had one full list; adding a second is increment.
Hmm.
**New issue 3 — real logic bug candidate**: Let me re-inspect `setPickerRowAreas` interplay with remove last chip keeping select open and the area select value cleared. When row returns to all areas, `rebuildPickerAreaSelect` populates the select's options with placeholder '' etc. But the select is hidden unless is-editing; row still is-editing because keepSelectOpen true. That means the user sees a select with "Adicionar área" placeholder while the row is actually all areas, and if they choose an option, it re-restricts. fine.
**New issue 4 — click-outside toggle when clicking in the cell's area wrap returns without toggling the checkbox even if clicking an area chip remove button? handled first. If clicking on the disabled select? `event.target.closest('.gov-auth-picker-area')` returns; no toggle. fine.
**New issue 5 — Bug in settings when saving member assignments that include role assignments when roles flag disabled** — because backend saves them regardless. fine.
Let me consider whether there's an actual data-loss issue: When user only toggles use_members/use_roles without other changes, scheduleSave -> persist -> server savePayload with approver assignments etc. That's fine.
Actually here's a more subtle bug: **`skipSave` is reset to false only at the end after `syncApproverMode()`, but `syncApproverMode()` calls scheduleSave() while skipSave still true** — that's fine, not data loss.
Let me check for a possible crash: In settings template JS, function `openApproverPicker` calls `window.jQuery('#govAuthAddApproverModal').modal('show');`. If bootstrap is loaded, ok. In index's other code they call `.modal('show')` similarly. fine.
Now potential: `_modal_add_approver.html.twig` is embedded `_modal.html.twig` with `modal_fit_content: true` and `modal_fixed_width: 720px` — but the modal partial CSS overrides etc. Not bug.
Let me inspect the modal embed's footer block: It uses `data-dismiss="modal"` on Cancel; with Bootstrap 3/4 this may not close unless jQuery bootstrap plugin enabled; index uses jQuery .modal() so bootstrap JS loaded. fine.
Alright. At this point, I think I should add a couple of genuine NEW issues that I'm confident about. Let me re-verify each candidate before raising:
**Confirmed set** already covers: CSS duplication & god template (#1/#4); missing backend field support (#2); no-op refresh default approvers (#3); CSRF missing (#5); debounce & error not handled (#6).
New candidates worth reporting:
A. **Type name XSS?** no.
B. **`readAutCriarSelectValue` reads hidden select values; but in the modal on save flow, the UI selection must first be committed to the native select by syncAutCriarSelectFromCustomUi, and for tags they flush pending... but for selects, if user typed/filtered but didn't click, native select value may not update — custom select components typically commit on selection. Not a bug.
C. **Refresh types function destroys option(s) in the current open modal's select even if the user is mid-edit**, silently clearing previously selected tipo for the currently open editing modal — because settings autosave runs in the background and refreshes shared select. Wait settings and create tabs both on same page; if a user leaves the Configurações tab open and there is a debounced pending save that fires, and then they open edit modal on the create tab and select a tipo while the autosave completes → the select rebuilt; probably negligible.
But here's a more concrete and meaningful scenario: `ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes` removes all options except first and rebuilds, then if `current` value not in new list, calls `resetAutCriarCustomSelect('autCriarTipo','')`, which clears the currently selected tipo in an **open create/edit modal**. Given settings autosave fires 400ms after any change, a manager working in Configurações while another manager (or the same session in another tab) edits... too contrived.
However, actually simpler: **same page**; the two tabs (create & settings) both exist. If a manager switches from Configurações to Criação while a debounce save is pending (within 400ms), it will refresh the tipo list on a create modal that may currently be open in edit mode and clear the tipo value if the edited record's type was removed. Marginal.
D. **A clearer bug**: In the settings template's `syncApproverMode`, if the user unchecks Members first while roles off (i.e., members is the only one on), unchecking Members makes both off and forces Members back on — that matches the requirement "Se os dois flags desligarem, Membros volta a ligado". OK.
E. Actually, check requirement detail from the OCR: "Desligar os dois flags de aprovador na Configuração: Membros deve permanecer ativo após o save." Wait the JS syncApproverMode enforces the invariant client side before save (both unchecked => members set checked again before payload). This means a user cannot even attempt to persist both flags false. And the backend enforces too. It matches the specified rule, though the rule phrased in background sounds contradictory (they expect save to result in members active). Fine.
F. Let me examine the changed validation ordering to see if any required field got dropped: title, areaId, responsavelId, tipo, requisitos, descricao. Wait responsavelId required — yes it's still required (they kept). But the hint added in modal says "Aprovador membro e cargo são opcionais..." but Responsavel remains required — consistent.
G. Interesting: Now the modal requires Área AND Tipo but on **editing older authorizations** these fields are null (no backfill). When a manager edits a legacy authorization, applyAutCriarModalFields leaves Area/Tipo empty and validation will block save unless the manager picks values. Editing a legacy authorization now requires supplying new required fields; not necessarily a bug.
H. On **viewing** a legacy record, modal fields empty; fine.
Hmm.
Let me look at a genuinely suspicious piece: In `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig` new code at lines 1999-2064 (validation). The removed requirement check for responsavel used custom; now uses `markAutCriarSelectInvalid`. And descricao moved to end. Did they accidentally remove the **requisito requirement**? Let me read the lines around 2020-2064.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 2080, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig", "start_line": 1990}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig (Total lines: 2423)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1990-2080
1990| if (typeof showToast === 'function') {
1991| showToast('Não foi possível carregar os dados da autorização.', 'Erro', 'fas fa-times', 'bg-danger');
1992| }
1993| return;
1994| }
1995| populateAutCriarModal(aut, 'edit', { extendMode: $btn.hasClass('js-aut-monit-open') });
1996| });
1997|
1998| /* ── Salvar ── */
1999| $(document).on('click', '#btnSalvarAdicionarAut', function () {
2000| flushAutCriarPendingRequisitoSelection();
2001| flushAutCriarPendingContractorReqSelection();
2002| AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS.forEach(syncAutCriarSelectFromCustomUi);
2003|
2004| var titulo = $.trim($('#autCriarTitulo').val());
2005| var descricao = $.trim($('#autCriarDescricao').val());
2006| var id = $('#autCriarEdicaoId').val();
2007| var responsavelId = readAutCriarResponsavelFromForm();
2008| var areaId = readAutCriarSelectId('autCriarArea');
2009| var aprovadorId = readAutCriarSelectId('autCriarAprovador');
2010| var aprovadorRoleId = readAutCriarSelectId('autCriarAprovadorRole');
2011| var tipo = readAutCriarSelectValue('autCriarTipo');
2012|
2013| if (MV) { MV.clearState(SCOPE); }
2014| else {
2015| $('#autCriarTitulo, #autCriarDescricao, #autCriarRequisitoAdd, #autCriarRequisitosTags, #autCriarContractorReqAdd, #autCriarContractorReqTags, #autCriarResponsavel, #autCriarArea, #autCriarAprovador, #autCriarAprovadorRole, #autCriarTipo').removeClass('is-invalid');
2016| $('#modalAdicionarAut .aut-criar-modal-select-wrap .custom-modern-select-trigger').removeClass('is-invalid');
2017| }
2018|
2019| var valid = true;
2020| if (!titulo) {
2021| if (MV) MV.markInvalid($('#autCriarTitulo')); else $('#autCriarTitulo').addClass('is-invalid');
2022| valid = false;
2023| }
2024| if (!areaId) {
2025| markAutCriarSelectInvalid('autCriarArea');
2026| valid = false;
2027| }
2028| if (!responsavelId) {
2029| markAutCriarSelectInvalid('autCriarResponsavel');
2030| valid = false;
2031| }
2032| if (!tipo) {
2033| markAutCriarSelectInvalid('autCriarTipo');
2034| valid = false;
2035| }
2036| var requisitos = getAutCriarRequisitosFromTags();
2037| if (requisitos.length === 0) {
2038| if (MV) {
2039| MV.markInvalid($('#autCriarRequisitoAdd'));
2040| MV.markInvalid($('#autCriarRequisitosTags'));
2041| MV.markInvalid($('#modalAdicionarAut .aut-criar-modal-select-wrap:has(#autCriarRequisitoAdd) .custom-modern-select-trigger'));
2042| } else {
2043| $('#autCriarRequisitoAdd, #autCriarRequisitosTags, #modalAdicionarAut .aut-criar-modal-select-wrap:has(#autCriarRequisitoAdd) .custom-modern-select-trigger').addClass('is-invalid');
2044| }
2045| valid = false;
2046| }
2047| if (!descricao) {
2048| if (MV) MV.markInvalid($('#autCriarDescricao')); else $('#autCriarDescricao').addClass('is-invalid');
2049| valid = false;
2050| }
2051| if (!valid) {
2052| if (MV) MV.showAlert(ALERT, '#modalAdicionarAut .modal-body');
2053| return;
2054| }
2055|
2056| setLoading(true);
2057|
2058| var payload = {
2059| id: id || null,
2060| titulo: titulo,
2061| descricao: descricao,
2062| requisitos: requisitos,
2063| contractor_requirement_dependencies: getAutCriarContractorReqsFromTags(),
2064| responsavel_id: responsavelId,
2065| area_id: areaId,
2066| aprovador_id: aprovadorId || null,
2067| aprovador_role_id: aprovadorRoleId || null,
2068| tipo: tipo
2069| };
2070| if (id) {
2071| payload.status = $('#autCriarStatusPreserve').val() || 'ativa';
2072| }
2073|
2074| $.ajax({
2075| url: SALVAR_URL,
2076| method: 'POST',
2077| contentType: 'application/json; charset=UTF-8',
2078| dataType: 'json',
2079| data: JSON.stringify(payload)
2080| }).done(function (res) {
Request #120
deepseek-v4-flash
P:104.27K C:2.34K CR:102.78K CW:0
20444ms
Reasoning
Wait, key insight: The create modal form — as part of it — is this on the same page as the settings tab. And the create modal sends POST to `SALVAR_URL` (GovernanceController::authorizationSave). It sends `area_id`, `tipo`, `aprovador_id`, `aprovador_role_id`. Confirmed #2 says backend doesn't read those fields yet. Skip repeating.
OK now, let me examine a new real problem that I've noticed: **The edit modal opens (populateAutCriarModal) via js-aut-criar-editar, which fetches auth data via aut detail endpoint; but ssma-aut... applyAutCriarModalFields reads fields area_id, tipo etc. which may not be returned from the detail endpoint.** This overlaps with confirmed #2.
What about validation UI behavior: they use `MV.markInvalid($sel)` for the hidden select — pre-existing pattern for responsavel, but they previously also marked the trigger; same.
Now I might be over-searching. Let me settle on real new issues worth reporting:
Since confirmed items already span many of the big issues, and I want to avoid duplicates, I'll look for concrete new ones:
1. **Settings autosave silently discards unsaved state whenever the user toggles the Members/Roles cards or adds/removes chips AND immediately clicks another tab** — confirmed (#6) covers.
2. **Roles hidden but listed** — design uncertain.
3. **CSS in partial modal unprefixed global selectors** minor and style dup already flagged.
Let me consider issue in `_modal_add_approver.html.twig` markup: `<div class="gov-auth-picker-filters" id="govAuthPickerFilters">`. On role picker, hide with `.d-none`. fine.
Wait, I should double check one thing: The settings JS runs `(initialTypes || []).forEach(addTypeChip);` inside an IIFE that runs as part of page script (top-level). If settings tab element IDs exist, code binds events at parse time; if the settings tab content is removed? It's within page that is static.
Potential **duplicate modal** issue: `_modal_add_approver.html.twig` is included in settings tab content. index cleanup hoists to body at page load. Good.
However, there's a subtle duplicate issue: If the `#tab_auth_configuracoes_content` div has CSS `style="display:none"` (if defaultAutTab not config) — the modal inside will be display:none as part of parent. They hoist it to body so it becomes visible when opened. fine.
Now let me inspect whether `hoistGovAuthCondModalToBody` also happens for `modalAdicionarAut`; yes existing behavior.
One potential real issue: Because the settings tab JS uses `window.jQuery('#govAuthAddApproverModal').modal('show')`, if the modal has already been hoisted to body and is reused, that's fine. But if the settings tab is re-rendered (twig includes) once; only once at page load. OK.
Given all this, let me decide to report these 3 genuine, non-duplicative findings:
**Finding A (new, functional/data integrity): In the picker modal, an approver restricted to a specific type can be saved even though the row's checkbox isn't checked**? No—submit only iterates checked rows. If you add a chip then uncheck, not saved. OK.
**Finding B: After applying a filter that hides rows, the select-all checkbox state is synced only over visible rows; toggling select-all then clears filters shows many rows unchecked while checkbox appears checked?** Actually select-all checks visible rows and sets checked state based on visible rows. If select-all on filtered results then clearing the filter shows more rows unchecked, but the header checkbox remains checked (because syncPickerCheckAll not called when filters cleared? Clearing filter via input triggers applyPickerFilters -> syncPickerCheckAll recomputes based on all visible rows including newly revealed unchecked rows → header becomes indeterminate). So OK.
**Finding C**: New issue regarding **uncontrolled empty state row**. When no items at all (all members added), they create only emptyRow and return; the row element has no data-id; `visiblePickerRows` filters `tr[data-id]` so empty row is excluded. But empty row doesn't have data-id, applyPickerFilters not invoked; fine.
Let me step back: Given confirmed findings are numerous and my additional candidates are weak/speculative, maybe there is a solid, undisputed issue I can still raise: **`ensureAutCriarSelectOption` mutates the option list permanently when opening the edit/view modal for a record whose área/tipo/aprovador is not in the current catalog.** Then after closing the modal and starting a fresh create, the appended "orphan" option remains selectable in the native select (hidden), and — since resetAutCriarModal only clears the selection, not the options — the user could submit a stale `area_id`/`tipo` that does not belong to the current config/catalog, violating the "tipo deve vir da Configuração" rule. Concretely: an old record has tipo "Vencida manual" removed from Config; editing it appends option "Vencida manual" to select; later creating a new authorization would allow selecting "Vencida manual" again even though it was removed from Configurações. That's a genuine state-consistency bug, worth reporting with medium/low severity.
Actually wait — is the option really persisted? applyAutCriarModalFields is called each time the modal is opened for edit (via populateAutCriarModal). For the create flow, when does one open the create modal? Possibly function openCreateAutModal that calls resetModal() (without apply) and then shows. The option appended earlier remains on the native select because resetAutCriarModal doesn't restore options. So the appended option persists for subsequent opens of the same modal. Confirm: resetAutCriarModal calls setAutCriarSelectValue(selectId,'') (doesn't remove options) → orphan option stays. Yes. So it's a real (if minor) issue: appended options are never cleaned up, causing stale catalog entries to be selectable in later creates. Also area option: If an area is later soft-deactivated and excluded from `aut_company_areas`, but the appended option remains → new authorizations could reference an inactive area. Medium. It's within `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig` newly added lines.
**Finding D**: In `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig`, the select option label `aut.area_name` etc might be blank if `aut.area` object but no name; then label = str id — tiny.
Another solid issue worth reporting could be: **`Tipo` values duplicate a user-defined config label may contain characters like quotes; stored as raw and later injected in Twig options via value attributes (autoescaped), ok.
**Finding E**: maybe relevant security: The create tab stores full `aut` object (including possibly sensitive fields like responsavel id, aprovador id...) in the `data-aut` attribute of each row via `aut|json_encode|e('html_attr')` — pre-existing.
Let me consider the settings view has no **loading state / concurrent save conflicts**: Already #6 partially.
Now, given the instructions that confirmed findings should not be repeated, but I still must keep reviewing; I can add the options-cleanup issue (Finding C). Are there others distinct enough?
**Finding F**: The required descricao previously was validated earlier but now the *alert shown is the generic 'Preencha todos os campos obrigatórios'*; unchanged.
**Finding G**: Type select options on initial page render from aut_authorization_types built server-side; but the **create modal includes `_custom_select` that renders the <select> with `options`, but the new `ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes` may be invoked before modal DOM exists**, then options rebuilt. fine.
Wait, actually maybe a stronger, verifiable bug: In `ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes`, when rebuilding options, they remove options `:not(:first)` then append labels. But the current `$select.val()` may be a value that equals the **placeholder ''** if nothing chosen. If user is in an edit modal with a currently-selected tipo (the option was appended from ensureAutCriarSelectOption for an old record), after refresh, if the tipo is not in new labels, they reset the select to '' — clears a previously selected value silently in the modal — an edge case where a manager is editing an old record while the config debounce fires (on same page, but requires Configurações autosave to fire after edits) — too contrived.
**Finding H**: `ensureAutCriarSelectOption` for aprovadorRole (role select) appends option with role id; options don't get removed on modal close/reopen; same cleanup issue as C.
I'll report the options-cleanup issue once, targeting `applyAutCriarModalFields`/`ensureAutCriarSelectOption`.
Now let me also double check the **idempotence/duplicate row** logic in settings: Two approvers with same member (or role) can't both be added because picker excludes them & addApproverRow guard. But different approvers could share... fine.
What about an approver member that is also approver role? no.
Let me look one more time at the `approverList` hydration and `hasApproverRow` query selector uses attribute quoting `data-id="'+String(id)+'"` — if id numeric fine.
Now let me pick a second genuinely solid new issue:
**Issue: `allMembers` used for both responsavel and aprovador lists in modal might include hundreds/thousands entries; but `_modal_authorization_form` also loops over them to build option arrays THREE times (responsavel, aprovador). Each include that loops allMembers builds in twig at render time; no runtime cost. Rendering cost one time, big HTML, but page render overhead. Moderate performance; but not fatal. Probably not worth reporting given the PR's confirmed perf points.
Let me examine more of modal markup (footer) to see if the Cancel button works and modal_footer left side? Actually footer_justify_content 'space-between' suggests two footer items at far ends. Let's read the modal footer block lines 240-260 of `_modal_authorization_form`.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 300, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig", "start_line": 215}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_authorization_form.html.twig (Total lines: 430)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 215-300
215| name="descricao"
216| class="form-control aut-criar-modal-field"
217| rows="3"
218| placeholder="Ex.: Autorização utilizada para manuseio de empilhadeiras"></textarea>
219| </div>
220|
221| <div class="form-group d-none" id="autCriarContractorReqWrap" aria-hidden="true">
222| <label for="autCriarContractorReqAdd">
223| Dependências documentais da empresa
224| </label>
225| <div class="aut-criar-modal-select-wrap">
226| {% include 'components/ui/_custom_select.html.twig' with {
227| id: 'autCriarContractorReqAdd',
228| name: 'autCriarContractorReqAdd',
229| label: 'Selecione os requisitos documentais',
230| selected_value: '',
231| options: aut_modal_contractor_req_options
232| } %}
233| </div>
234| <div id="autCriarContractorReqTags" class="aut-criar-req-tags" role="list"></div>
235| </div>
236| </form>
237| </div>
238| {% endblock %}
239|
240| {% block modal_footer %}
241| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button>
242| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-primary d-inline-flex align-items-center" id="btnSalvarAdicionarAut">
243| <span class="spinner-border spinner-border-sm d-none mr-1" id="autCriarSpinner" role="status" aria-hidden="true"></span>
244| <span id="autCriarBtnLabel">Criar autorização</span>
245| </button>
246| {% endblock %}
247|{% endembed %}
248|
249|<style>
250| #modalAdicionarAut .modern-form .form-group > label {
251| font-size: 14px;
252| font-weight: 500;
253| color: #1e1e1e;
254| margin-bottom: 6px;
255| }
256|
257| #modalAdicionarAut .mhs-modal-content {
258| max-height: none;
259| height: auto;
260| overflow: visible !important;
261| }
262|
263| #modalAdicionarAut .mhs-modal-body {
264| flex: 0 0 auto;
265| overflow: visible !important;
266| padding-top: 16px !important;
267| padding-bottom: 8px !important;
268| }
269|
270| #modalAdicionarAut .mhs-modal-header {
271| padding-top: 16px !important;
272| padding-bottom: 16px !important;
273| }
274|
275| #modalAdicionarAut .mhs-modal-footer {
276| padding-top: 12px !important;
277| padding-bottom: 12px !important;
278| }
279|
280| #modalAdicionarAut .modern-form .form-group {
281| margin-bottom: 12px;
282| }
283|
284| #modalAdicionarAut .aut-criar-modal-row {
285| display: flex;
286| gap: 12px;
287| align-items: flex-end;
288| }
289|
290| #modalAdicionarAut .aut-criar-modal-row > .form-group {
291| flex: 1 1 0;
292| min-width: 0;
293| margin-bottom: 12px;
294| }
295|
296| #modalAdicionarAut .aut-criar-aprovador-hint {
297| margin: -4px 0 12px;
298| font-size: 12px;
299| font-weight: 400;
300| line-height: 1.4;
Request #121
deepseek-v4-flash
P:107.58K C:5.68K CR:106.5K CW:0
46735ms
Reasoning
Fine.
Given confirmed findings are extensive, my final output can include just one or two new issues found. Let me also validate one more possible issue for the settings template: **`notifyError` shows a toast inside the settings tab context; but when the config POST fails after a sequence where a later save succeeded?** no.
Let me decide on the final set of NEW comments:
**1. ensureAutCriarSelectOption leaves orphan options; no cleanup.** Category maintainability/low? It's a functional state leak causing possible submission of out-of-catalog area/tipo in later new-authorization flows, plus stale UI entries. I'd rate medium severity, maintainability/functional.
Actually, let me double-check that this is truly triggered in normal flow — yes: Edit an authorization whose tipo was already deleted (or area now filtered/inactive) while config had a removed type; ensure appends option; later open create; the orphan option remains. It may also appear in a view of other record whose area is in catalog, but hidden? Wait the appended option is present among options; but if the user chooses placeholder '' then submits nothing. To actually pick the orphan tipo the user must intentionally select it. In normal create flow (fresh modal after an edit), options of autCriarTipo show placeholder + configured types + appended orphan option. Since appending places it after all existing options in DOM, it becomes visible in the dropdown. Yes.
But if the orphan came from editing a record in VIEW mode? same effect. OK, report.
**2. In settings template, the member picker/catalog filters use team names but when roles are picked the member filters hidden... no.
Let me look for one more real issue: **A user who toggles Members/Roles flags on settings and saves, but then opens create modal: the create modal's aprovador select always lists allMembers and cargo selects list all company roles regardless of the config flags and regardless of the approver lists** — that's intended: creation form lets you pick any member/role as specific aprovador, overriding defaults; config flags only matter for defaults. OK.
**3. Actual distinct potential bug**: When the manager limits an approver to certain types and then removes that type from Configurações — `syncAllApproverAreaSelects` sets row back to all areas (kept empty → allAreas). This silently *widens* approval scope of that approver from specific types to all areas with autosave, which is a safety/approval-widening side effect that happens with no confirmation. This could let approvers approve authorization types they were never meant to cover. That seems like a genuine data integrity/security behavior worth flagging as medium. Compare backend: if all area keys removed and all_areas false → server rejects empty scope (must choose at least one or all). The frontend auto-upgrades to all areas to avoid that error. Business-wise, converting to all-areas might be unexpected and perhaps should instead drop the approver row or force choosing a new scope. Hmm is it plausible intended behavior? "Cada um começa em Todas as Áreas e pode ser limitado a tipos específicos." Removing a type makes existing restricted approver no longer have a valid area key; fallback to all-areas widens scope. A manager removing a type probably expects approvers limited to it to be... cleared? Widening silently could be surprising but arguably acceptable as fallback to all areas. It is a borderline product decision, I'd mention as low/medium severity with suggestion to confirm desired behavior. Maybe safer to skip.
I want to pick only genuinely defensible findings. Let me scan for possible XSS vector more carefully since priority 2: settings template at line 359 removeBtn.innerHTML = '<i ...>' constant. createChip for labels textContent. Type labels used in attributes: `removeBtn.setAttribute('aria-label', 'Remover ' + label)` — fine as attribute. `chip.setAttribute('data-type', key)` fine. In modal form, no innerHTML with user data.
Then in create file, new `ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes` uses `$('<option/>').val(label).text(label)` jQuery escapes. `.custom-modern-option` built from text. fine.
No XSS.
OK final comment list:
- New issue 1 (options cleanup) in `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig`.
Should I also add a new comment about `markAutCriarSelectInvalid` marks only the native hidden select via MV for both select and trigger (fine). no.
Let me think once more about the **required + hint text**: The hint says "Membro e cargo podem coexistir. Se nenhum for informado, a demanda usa os aprovadores padrão das Configurações." And requiredness: Responsável still required. The wording may confuse Responsável vs Aprovador; not important.
Potential issue: **Descriptions & help removal**: they removed help text describing contractor req behavior — no.
Let me at least revisit the earlier candidate regarding `settings autosave changes lost when user closes tab while debounce pending`, already confirmed.
Now the "isolamento por empresa" dimension: Templates don't handle company; backend uses company via current workspace. The frontend does not send company_id. Good (isolation server side). But there's a possible template issue: The settings GET/POST endpoints are identical path but different methods; the create page's `config` GET is not called from frontend. fine.
Migration correctness: out of scope.
Given the constraints, maybe the best is to also report the **"Área obrigatória sem opções quando não há áreas"**? Areas exist company-wide from company_area; nearly always present. skip.
Hmm, also worth re-examining: the modal create now has Tipo required. But what if `aut_authorization_types` is empty because config not yet created, but there are no tipo options. Creation completely blocked until admin config. Given the PR scope is to add config, maybe the controller/back-end allows tipo to be nullable with empty. But since field required and empty list, creating is impossible. The test spec says to first configure types. So by design.
So I'll keep the final review to the new options-cleanup issue, plus maybe the "silently widens to all areas when a type is removed" point (medium). But given uncertain product intent, I'd rather report only the options-cleanup and close.
Actually, let me reconsider one more potential NEW issue that is quite concrete in `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig`: The line `var initialTypes = {{ aut_authorization_types|default([])|json_encode|raw }};` — if server returns aut_authorization_types with more than 100 types (can't; server caps). OK.
Let me also evaluate: The settings JS `syncAllApproverAreaSelects` is invoked when a type chip is added (addTypeChip). If approver rows exist whose restricted area keys list references the newly added type, they remain restricted (not reset). Wait, if a row was restricted to types A, B and you add type C then sync keeps A,B — fine.
Another possible moderate: When adding a type after approvers exist, `setRowAreas` in syncAllApproverAreaSelects on all-area rows just rebuilds the select. good.
Now think about the settings createChip remove button for person in row uses class `gov-auth-approver-row__person` chip; removing a person row; ok.
Let me finalize with these two comments:
1. Orphan option not cleaned (create tab).
2. Also worth flagging one subtle but *definite* bug: In the settings `persist`, `res.authorization_types` fallback uses `payload.authorization_types` while `ssmaRefreshAutAuthorizationTypes` uses the argument directly. Confirmed #3 already mentions related no-op.
I might also report that in the modal add-approver partial, filters select's options come from catalog but the member rows already in settings aren't necessarily all from catalog — eh.
Hmm. Given the confirmed set is large, reporting only one additional minor issue seems thin but honest. Let me re-check the code for a potential real bug in the picker area **pill editing for rows of roles**: For role rows, area pill also present; selecting area works; roles limited to tipos. OK.
Wait — I want to double-check something about the CSS rule and `role="button"`/keyboard accessibility not needed.
One more concrete bug possibility: `pickerBody.addEventListener('click', function(event){ ... })` handles clicking the checkbox row area? The `input[type="checkbox"]` click event target is the input; row handler returns early; change event handles check state. But clicking **name cell** toggles the checkbox. That's intended? The click on the row toggles check unless it's in the area wrap. The avatar/name text is also clickable, toggles. OK.
And when clicking the pill (button) of an area with no types configured → pill click sets is-editing, but select disabled; no options; row is all areas; adding area impossible until types added. The pill still appears even when types disabled (0 types)? Actually the area pill always appears for all-areas rows, even with no types; clicking it opens a disabled select with placeholder "Cadastre um tipo acima" — fine.
Now the last candidate: **`openApproverPicker` calls `renderPickerRows` before modal show; in the settings tab the pickerBody is inside a modal that might already be present in body.** yes fine.
I'm confident the options-cleanup issue is real; the widen-to-all-areas when removing type is a plausible design but worth mentioning with low priority as a UX/safety consideration? I think I can mention it as a note attached to the settings type removal handler since removal of last area key -> all areas is silent; given approvals scope widening, managers may not notice an approver now covers everything. It's a legitimate data-scope side effect. I'd frame as medium severity.
Actually let me confirm: In settings row click handler (removing an area chip), kept length===0 -> setRowAreas(row, true, []) -> ALL_AREAS chip. In type chip removal, syncAllApproverAreaSelects also does that for rows restricted solely to removed types. Yes.
Both silent autosaved. For "approval" domain, silently expanding approver scope is meaningful. I'll report.
Let me also add one low-severity note about `.gov-auth-settings-option` divs (card) vs label click double toggling? Let me test logic: click on label (not card) triggers native toggle; the card click handler returns early when target tagName === 'LABEL'. Native click toggles checkbox → change bubbles to checkbox listener sync. OK. No double toggle. Clicking checkbox: same. Clicking anywhere else in the card: toggles checkbox via JS and dispatches change. No double toggle because handler doesn't fall through (returns at end? Actually if clicked elsewhere (not checkbox/label), handler toggles and returns? The handler: after toggle & dispatch, function ends. It doesn't also rely on native. fine.
Let me now finalize and write the code comments in Portuguese.
I'll produce:
1. Comment on `ensureAutCriarSelectOption` (create tab) about orphan options never cleaned -> stale options can appear in later creates (data consistency).
2. Comment on settings type removal / restricted approver -> all areas silently (approval scope widening) — maybe phrase as needs product confirmation; category other/medium. Should I report? Yes, medium severity maybe "maintainability" or "other". Better category 'other'. But the tool categories: bug/security/performance/maintainability/test/style/documentation/other. I'd use 'bug'? Not necessarily a bug. Let's choose 'other'. Hmm. Might be better as maintainability. I'll write it as a low/medium.
Wait but given we need to avoid speculative comments, maybe skip #2. Let me weigh.
Actually there is something more concrete and important I should verify: In the create modal validation, they call `markAutCriarSelectInvalid('autCriarResponsavel')` etc. However the CSS uses `.aut-criar-modal-select-wrap:has(select.is-invalid) .custom-modern-select-trigger` and also trigger.is-invalid. When MV present, MV.markInvalid probably toggles `.is-invalid` classes and also inserts `.invalid-feedback`. If MV.markInvalid($sel) marks a hidden select, feedback won't show, but they also MV.markInvalid($trigger) giving feedback near the trigger? This is what the old code did for responsavel plus it targeted the trigger by wrapper selector. The new markAutCriarSelectInvalid adds trigger directly. If MV's markInvalid creates a sibling `.invalid-feedback` element for the trigger, might position okay. Not new bug.
OK let's also note: the select `.custom-modern-select-hidden` is `display:none`, so `MV.markInvalid($sel)` on it triggers nothing visible; old code marked only the trigger via wrapper :has. They mark both. Same net.
Given time, final.
Let me also check one more new definite issue related to the settings member picker **list of roles**: catalogRoles from aut_company_roles; the hub merges aut_company_roles (list of roles). In SsmaController path not merged (legacy). fine.
I'm going to provide these comments:
1. (bug, medium) `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig` ensure/apply functions append "orphan" options that persist after modal closes because reset only clears value, allowing future creates to pick removed/inactive área/tipo.
2. (bug/other, medium) `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` removing the last configured type turns restricted approvers back to "Todas as Áreas" silently and autosaves — expands approval scope without user intent; suggest instead flagging and requiring new scope (or keeping them restricted to no areas), at least confirm the product intent.
Actually, wait — regarding #2 there is a strong counterpoint: The behavior may be deliberate "fallback" and matches setRowAreas used when adding rows defaulting all-areas. But raising it as a question with explanation is acceptable as low severity since product reviewer must confirm. I'll frame it as attention with suggestion to confirm.
Hmm, since the reviewer guidance says comments must be concise and point out real issues; speculative product-intent comments should be flagged "out of scope/confirm" — acceptable.
Let me also potentially add #3: In settings page, when there are no configured types and the manager opens picker, area pill says Todas as Áreas (fine).
Let me finalize now. Ensure comments are in pt-BR, first phrase simple.
Additionally, we should probably acknowledge the confirmed findings not repeated. And the review should give each file a pass.
Let me confirm diff line anchors for code_comment. Need existing_code snippet that exists in the diff (new lines). For comment 1, anchor new lines from `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig`:
`ensureAutCriarSelectOption('autCriarTipo', tipo, tipo);`
or the function definition:
```
function ensureAutCriarSelectOption(selectId, value, text) {
```
Yes those lines are added. Use:
```
ensureAutCriarSelectOption('autCriarArea', areaId, aut.area_name || (aut.area && aut.area.name) || '');
```
Must match diff text exactly. It appears as newly added lines in the diff. Let's choose a shorter unique snippet:
```
ensureAutCriarSelectOption('autCriarTipo', tipo, tipo);
```
This line is new (added). Good anchor.
For comment 2 anchor in settings:
```
chip.remove();
var kept = collectAreaKeys(row);
setRowAreas(row, kept.length === 0, kept);
```
Wait that's in the approverList click handler (added lines). Actually the type-removal-related widening happens in `typeChips` click handler which calls `syncAllApproverAreaSelects()`; the widening happens inside syncAllApproverAreaSelects:
```
var kept = collectAreaKeys(row).filter(function (key) {
return !!allowed[labelKey(key)];
}).map(function (key) {
return allowed[labelKey(key)];
});
setRowAreas(row, kept.length === 0, kept);
```
That's new code. Anchor:
```
setRowAreas(row, kept.length === 0, kept);
```
This exact line appears twice? Let me check: In settings, this line appears in syncAllApproverAreaSelects (once) and in the approverList click handler (once) `setRowAreas(row, kept.length === 0, kept);`. So two occurrences in the file but only the sync function was in the diff as added lines (the whole file is new, so both lines are new). For the code_comment matching algorithm, they probably find by consecutive lines in the diff; I can anchor multiple lines unique to syncAllApproverAreaSelects:
```
var kept = collectAreaKeys(row).filter(function (key) {
return !!allowed[labelKey(key)];
}).map(function (key) {
return allowed[labelKey(key)];
});
setRowAreas(row, kept.length === 0, kept);
```
That is unique. Good.
Maybe also add third comment: the non-scoped global selectors for `.gov-auth-picker-*` CSS classes in the modal partial can clash with any other page including the modal? Already confirmed #1 CSS duplication. Skip.
Let me reconsider if there are any remaining *higher-priority* items (security / isolation / data integrity) I may have missed in templates:
Isolation: The picker member catalog (`allMembers`) on the settings is scoped to the company by the controller's viewData, presumably. Since variables come from hub build($company). Good.
Data integrity: on submit `submitPicker` etc.
Alright, I'm fairly confident there are no additional critical issues; I'll report the two new comments with honest severity and then conclude.
Actually, wait. Let me double check comment 1 more thoroughly — is there any cleanup on resetAutCriarModal that resets the options to original state for selects? No. For requisito tags, they reset via resetAutCriarTagSelect which restores initialHtml of option lists (they saved config.initialHtml). But for the new plain selects (area, tipo, aprovador, cargo), no such restoration. Confirmed reset only sets value ''. So orphan options remain. Yes.
But hold on: is applyAutCriarModalFields always called for the *edit* and *view* flows only? For create, opening the modal resets only. If user edited an old record with orphan tipo then closed, and later clicked "Criar autorização", the orphan option is present in the dropdown but the create flow's payload requires the manager to explicitly choose the orphan option in the dropdown (visible). Since it's visible among options in the custom select. This is a state leak: options list is meant to reflect current config, but a stale value remains. Additionally, after orphan option appended to `autCriarTipo` select, if user creates a new authorization and selects that orphan tipo value, then the select option exists in native select and the payload will include that tipo (not necessarily validated by backend against config). Backend resolveTypeLabel may map to null if tipo doesn't exist in config — authorizationSave handler (outside) would maybe not validate tipo. Confirmed #2 says fields aren't persisted, but in the next branch (when backend adds support), this would become a real bug.
I'll set severity medium for comment 1.
I think comment 2 is worth low-medium. I'll include it because it can silently widen approval scope (data/security-ish, approver scope). Category other or bug? Since consequence is unintended approver scope broadening with auto-save, I'd set security/medium? Better 'other' or 'bug' with severity low. Hmm the tool wants category among those; choose 'bug' & severity low? Actually "widening scope" is more of a product/data-integrity nuance. I'll go 'bug' severity low? I think medium is apt given silent broadening. Let's write it.
Let me formulate each in Portuguese with the required format (what changed and practical impact first; why matters; what to do).
Also include a short summary of overall review status at end? The system says call task_done when done. There's no requirement for a chat message. Typically we output reasoning then tool calls. I'll call code_comment with the two comments, then task_done.
Wait: Should I also consider that the response (comment) content is inserted as a code review note, so each comment content begins in pt-BR simple phrase.
Let me craft comment texts.
Comment 1 content:
"Se abrir a edição/visualização de uma autorização cuja área, tipo, aprovador ou cargo não está mais na lista atual, essas opções são inseridas no select e nunca são removidas ao fechar/limpar o modal — o reset só limpa o valor escolhido. Na prática, um tipo ou área removido da Configuração volta a aparecer para novas criações e pode ser salvo em autorização nova. Vale restaurar a lista original de opções a cada abertura do modal (ou remover as opções injetadas quando o campo for limpo), garantindo que o catálogo do formulário reflita sempre o que está vigente na Configuração."
Comment 2:
"Quando um tipo de autorização é removido e algum aprovador estava restrito apenas a esse tipo, o fluxo converte o aprovador automaticamente para 'Todas as Áreas' e já agenda o save. Ou seja, remover um tipo pode, sem aviso, ampliar o escopo de aprovação de um aprovador que antes só cobria aquele recorte — exatamente o oposto da intenção da remoção. Isso pode deixar um aprovador responsável por tipos que ele nunca deveria aprovar. Sugiro não fazer o fallback silencioso: manter o aprovador sem escopo válido e exigir que o gestor defina o novo recorte (ou confirmar explicitamente a ampliação) antes de persistir."
Then call task_done.
Let me double-check exact anchors in new code (must be consecutive lines in diff as added). For comment 1 anchor pick lines:
```
ensureAutCriarSelectOption('autCriarArea', areaId, aut.area_name || (aut.area && aut.area.name) || '');
```
It's a single line; code_comment expects "one or several consecutive lines of code most relevant". We can pass a snippet of the added block:
```
ensureAutCriarSelectOption('autCriarArea', areaId, aut.area_name || (aut.area && aut.area.name) || '');
setAutCriarSelectValue('autCriarArea', areaId);
```
I must verify that in the diff added lines the indentation is exactly 8 spaces. Let me look at the added block:
```
+ setAutCriarSelectValue('autCriarResponsavel', resolveAutCriarResponsavelId(aut));
+ ensureAutCriarSelectOption('autCriarArea', areaId, aut.area_name || (aut.area && aut.area.name) || '');
+ setAutCriarSelectValue('autCriarArea', areaId);
```
Yes. Use those two consecutive lines.
Comment 2 anchor within the settings file; verify formatting of lines in file:
```
var kept = collectAreaKeys(row).filter(function (key) {
return !!allowed[labelKey(key)];
}).map(function (key) {
return allowed[labelKey(key)];
});
setRowAreas(row, kept.length === 0, kept);
```
Look at file lines from read earlier: 700-line region? Actually lines from earlier I saw in a range? syncAllApproverAreaSelects is between lines ~450? It appeared in diff. Let me quickly confirm exact text from the settings file region (I read lines 700-1199 only). I haven't seen these lines in the read but they were shown in the diff of new file with exact text:
```
+ Array.prototype.forEach.call(approverList.querySelectorAll('.gov-auth-approver-row'), function (row) {
+ if (row.getAttribute('data-all-areas') !== '1') {
+ var kept = collectAreaKeys(row).filter(function (key) {
+ return !!allowed[labelKey(key)];
+ }).map(function (key) {
+ return allowed[labelKey(key)];
+ });
+ setRowAreas(row, kept.length === 0, kept);
```
Wait, note in the diff for syncAllApproverAreaSelects: The indentation in the actual diff may be 16 spaces with nested function. The diff shows:
```
+ var kept = collectAreaKeys(row).filter(function (key) {
+ return !!allowed[labelKey(key)];
+ }).map(function (key) {
+ return allowed[labelKey(key)];
+ });
+ setRowAreas(row, kept.length === 0, kept);
```
I'll anchor on:
```
+ var kept = collectAreaKeys(row).filter(function (key) {
+ return !!allowed[labelKey(key)];
+ }).map(function (key) {
+ return allowed[labelKey(key)];
+ });
+ setRowAreas(row, kept.length === 0, kept);
```
The matching engine uses consecutive-line matching to mount comment; since the file is brand-new, these added lines exist exactly. Good.
However I must double check the exact text from file — since file added fully, read to confirm lines. Let me read that section lines ~445-475.
Vou confirmar os trechos exatos para ancorar os comentários finais.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 505, "file_path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig", "start_line": 440}
Result
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig (Total lines: 1224)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 440-505
440|
441| function selectedAreaKeyMap(root) {
442| var selectedKeys = {};
443| collectAreaKeys(root).forEach(function (key) {
444| selectedKeys[labelKey(key)] = true;
445| });
446| return selectedKeys;
447| }
448|
449| function fillAreaSelect(select, selectedKeys) {
450| if (!select) {
451| return;
452| }
453| var types = currentTypes();
454| select.innerHTML = '';
455| var placeholder = document.createElement('option');
456| placeholder.value = '';
457| placeholder.textContent = types.length ? 'Adicionar área' : 'Cadastre um tipo acima';
458| select.appendChild(placeholder);
459| if (types.length) {
460| var allOption = document.createElement('option');
461| allOption.value = ALL_AREAS_VALUE;
462| allOption.textContent = ALL_AREAS_LABEL;
463| select.appendChild(allOption);
464| }
465| types.forEach(function (label) {
466| if (selectedKeys[labelKey(label)]) {
467| return;
468| }
469| var option = document.createElement('option');
470| option.value = label;
471| option.textContent = label;
472| select.appendChild(option);
473| });
474| select.disabled = types.length === 0;
475| select.value = '';
476| }
477|
478| function rebuildApproverAreaSelect(row) {
479| fillAreaSelect(row.querySelector('.gov-auth-approver-area-select'), selectedAreaKeyMap(row));
480| }
481|
482| function rebuildPickerAreaSelect(row) {
483| fillAreaSelect(row.querySelector('.gov-auth-picker-area-select'), selectedAreaKeyMap(row));
484| }
485|
486| function syncAllApproverAreaSelects() {
487| if (!approverList) {
488| return;
489| }
490| var types = currentTypes();
491| var allowed = {};
492| types.forEach(function (label) {
493| allowed[labelKey(label)] = label;
494| });
495| Array.prototype.forEach.call(approverList.querySelectorAll('.gov-auth-approver-row'), function (row) {
496| if (row.getAttribute('data-all-areas') !== '1') {
497| var kept = collectAreaKeys(row).filter(function (key) {
498| return !!allowed[labelKey(key)];
499| }).map(function (key) {
500| return allowed[labelKey(key)];
501| });
502| setRowAreas(row, kept.length === 0, kept);
503| } else {
504| rebuildApproverAreaSelect(row);
505| }
Request #122
deepseek-v4-flash
P:113.93K C:924 CR:113.15K CW:0
6863ms
Reasoning
Good. Anchor comment 2 lines:
```
var kept = collectAreaKeys(row).filter(function (key) {
return !!allowed[labelKey(key)];
}).map(function (key) {
return allowed[labelKey(key)];
});
setRowAreas(row, kept.length === 0, kept);
```
Now produce final code_comment with these two comments and task_done.
Let me make sure each comment content: first sentence simple Portuguese, then why it matters, then what to do. Include technical references after.
Comment 1 path create template.
Let me choose severity 'medium' both, categories: comment1 'bug' (or maintainability). I'll set category bug and severity medium. Comment2 category 'bug' and severity medium (since silent scope widening could affect who approves). Hmm category 'bug' might fit comment2 (side-effect); maybe 'security' is too strong. Use 'bug'.
Let me prepare.
Revisei todos os arquivos do grupo. Os problemas mais relevantes já confirmados em passada anterior (sem repeti-los) são: ausência de CSRF no autosave, perda de alterações com debounce, função `ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers` vazia, contrato inexistente com o backend para `area_id`/`tipo`/aprovadores, duplicação de CSS/estilos e padrão de "god template". Abaixo, dois achados novos que não se sobrepõem a eles.
Tool Calls (1)
code_comment
Show Details
Arguments
{"comments": [{"content": "Ao abrir a edição/visualização de uma autorização cuja área, tipo, aprovador ou cargo não está mais na lista atual, essas opções são inseridas dinamicamente no select e nunca são removidas: o reset do modal só limpa o valor selecionado, não restaura as opções originais. Na prática, um tipo ou área que foi removido da Configuração volta a aparecer para uma criação nova e pode ser enviado no payload de uma autorização nova, quebrando a regra de que o formulário usa apenas o catálogo vigente. Vale restaurar a lista de opções original a cada abertura do modal (ou remover as opções injetadas no reset), mantendo o formulário sempre alinhado à Configuração.", "existing_code": " ensureAutCriarSelectOption('autCriarArea', areaId, aut.area_name || (aut.area && aut.area.name) || '');\n setAutCriarSelectValue('autCriarArea', areaId);", "category": "bug", "severity": "medium", "path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig"}, {"content": "Quando um tipo de autorização é removido e um aprovador estava restrito só a esse tipo, o código converte silenciosamente o aprovador para \"Todas as Áreas\" e já agenda o salvamento automático. Ou seja, remover um tipo pode ampliar, sem nenhum aviso, o escopo de aprovação de quem antes cobria apenas aquele recorte — o oposto da intenção da remoção — e isso já é persistido. Isso pode deixar um aprovador responsável por autorizações que ele nunca deveria aprovar. Sugiro não fazer esse fallback silencioso: manter o aprovador sem escopo válido e exigir que o gestor defina o novo recorte (ou confirmar explicitamente a ampliação para todas as áreas) antes de salvar.", "existing_code": " var kept = collectAreaKeys(row).filter(function (key) {\n return !!allowed[labelKey(key)];\n }).map(function (key) {\n return allowed[labelKey(key)];\n });\n setRowAreas(row, kept.length === 0, kept);", "category": "bug", "severity": "medium", "path": "templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig"}]}
Result
(async)
Request #123
deepseek-v4-flash
P:114.87K C:46 CR:114.82K CW:0
1653ms
Tool Calls (1)
task_done
Show Details
Arguments
{"state": "DONE"}
memory_compression_task
Request #1
deepseek-v4-flash
P:105.64K C:145 CR:384 CW:0
5564ms
Reasoning
Let me continue reading the settings file around the rest of hydration and events, and also the remaining create file sections (empty function at 2419). Let me also inspect the `opts` + event bindings to confirm the "silent" hydration and any bug with scheduleSave skipping.
2025-06-30T14:02:11.000Z
The settings tab shows the full script. Let me read the remaining part starting line 609 to the end to inspect hydration and event bindings.Agora preciso ver o restante das configurações (linhas 609–1224) e as demais partes da aba de criação (função vazia e inicialização).
review_filter_task
Request #1
deepseek-v4-flash
P:26.13K C:1.12K CR:1.92K CW:0
9043ms
Reasoning
Let me analyze each comment.
The comments are about various files. Let me go through them.
c-0: path `templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_add_approver.html.twig`. The comment says the new partial loads ~300 lines of inline CSS and duplicates rules that already exist in the settings tab (same definitions of .gov-auth-settings-chip, chip__remove and area colors in _tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig). This is a style/maintainability comment. The new file indeed has inline CSS including `.gov-auth-settings-chip` definitions and `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig` also has those definitions. What it states is true. Value veto — approve (style, maintainability). Not a factual wrongness ground.
Actually wait — is this true? Let's verify duplicates. In _modal_add_approver.html.twig: `#govAuthAddApproverModal .gov-auth-settings-chip {...}` definitions exist (chip, chip__remove, etc.). In settings: `#governance_auth_settings_content .gov-auth-settings-chip`. These are near-duplicates. The comment claims duplication. True. It's a style suggestion. Approve.
c-1: path `templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig`. Comment claims the modal sends area_id, tipo, aprovador_id, aprovador_role_id on save, but backend contract doesn't exist yet (outside this diff). Also hubs don't serialize them. This is about behavior in files the agent saw that we cannot see. Claims about backend controllers not in the diff. We cannot verify. Also, this relates to a parameter/behavior claim referencing files outside the diff. Not provable from diff. Approve.
Is it Ground A? The comment discusses the controller which isn't in the subject file diff — but the comment's subject file is the template which does include the payload. The comment's central claim is about files we can't see (controller not reading these fields). We cannot verify. Approve.
c-2: path `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig`. Comment says ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers is declared empty and called right after saving Settings, implying create modal would sync with default approvers — never happens. Is this "a parameter the function accepts and never uses"? No. Is it a protected subject? It's about a stub function that does nothing and a call that does nothing. Ground A/B: The function is declared empty in the diff, and indeed called in settings file persist(). The comment states: declared empty, called after save. Both are visible in diff. The claim is that sync never happens because the function body is empty. That's true from the diff: `window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers = function () {\n};` empty. And in settings file: `if (typeof window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers === 'function') { window.ssmaRefreshAutDefaultApprovers(res.approver_members || payload.approver_members); }`. So the call passes approver_members to an empty function. The comment is correct factually. It's a suggestion to remove or implement. Not wrong. Approve.
c-3: path `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig`. Comment about the giant inline script/style and god template pattern, suggesting moving to assets. Style/maintainability value. Not a factual error. Approve (value veto, if true). The claim about ~1200 lines: the file has 1223 lines total, mostly CSS+JS. True enough. Approve.
c-4: path `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig`. Comment about CSRF: the autosave POST doesn't send a CSRF token; if endpoint validates, saving fails, else route open to forged POST. This touches behavioral/security. Is this a protected subject? CSRF isn't in the protected list explicitly. It's about behavioral failure / security. Hmm. The comment asserts the POST doesn't include any CSRF token — that's visible in the diff (the ajax call has url, method, contentType, data; no headers, no token). True from the diff. The rest is conditional speculation about backend validation, unverifiable. The central claim that the request has no CSRF token is true as seen in the diff... but we can't verify whether token is included elsewhere or whether backend validates. The diff shows the ajax with no CSRF. The comment is not provably wrong. Approve.
c-5: path `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig`. Comment about autosave debounce not flushing on page unload; last change lost. That's a behavioral claim about runtime. The diff shows scheduleSave debounce 400ms without flush. The claim that nothing flushes on unload — can we verify? Within the diff there's no pagehide/beforeunload handler, so the claim as to this file is consistent. Not provably wrong. Approve.
So all approve.
Let me be careful: are any Ground A/B? No comment is contradicted by a diff line. All target code exists in their subject files or is unverifiable.
Approve all.
Tool Calls (1)
approve_all_comments
Show Details
Arguments
{}
Request #2
deepseek-v4-flash
P:25.15K C:1.66K CR:18.69K CW:0
11998ms
Reasoning
Let me analyze these two comments carefully.
Comment c-0 is about `templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig`. It claims that when opening edit/view of an authorization whose area, type, approver or role is not in the current list, those options get dynamically inserted into the select and never removed: the modal reset only clears the selected value, doesn't restore original options. So a removed type or area reappears for a new creation.
Let me check the diff. In `_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig`, there's `ensureAutCriarSelectOption` which appends options. There's `resetAutCriarModal` function that clears selects. Let me look at the reset function:
```
resetAutCriarReqTags();
resetAutCriarContractorReqTags();
AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS.forEach(function (selectId) {
setAutCriarSelectValue(selectId, '');
});
```
`setAutCriarSelectValue` with empty value calls `resetAutCriarCustomSelect(selectId, '')`. Let me check what resetAutCriarCustomSelect does — it's not in the diff (it's pre-existing code). The comment claims the reset doesn't remove injected options. This is a behavioral claim about runtime behavior. Is it protected? It's about behavior... Actually, this comment is a behavioral change/suggestion about the form behavior — but wait, protected subjects include "Behavioral or compatibility change — a message, field, status, or default that the old code produced and the new code no longer does". That's about a change in behavior introduced by the diff. Hmm.
Actually let me re-read the comment. It's not exactly about a change in the diff — it describes behavior of the new code. The subject is dynamic injection of options into select, and reset not removing them. This is about... form behavior. It could be considered behavioral reasoning about runtime. But the review comment itself — is it a bug in the code? It reasons about runtime behavior that I can't fully verify from the diff because `resetAutCriarCustomSelect` and the custom-select implementation are in files I can't see.
Actually, let me focus on what the task asks: remove only comments that this diff proves to be factually wrong. Ground A or Ground B.
For c-0: The comment discusses code present in the diff: `ensureAutCriarSelectOption`, `setAutCriarSelectValue`, `applyAutCriarModalFields`, the reset function. The claim: injected options are never removed because the reset only clears selected value, not restores original options. Is there a diff line that literally contradicts this? The reset code shows `AUT_CRIAR_SELECT_IDS.forEach(... setAutCriarSelectValue(selectId, '') ...)`. Does `resetAutCriarCustomSelect` remove options? We don't see it. So we can't confirm the claim is wrong. And the "restore the list" suggestion is about behavior. Actually we need to determine whether there is a contradiction. There isn't a line that contradicts. Whether the options injected are removed depends on code outside the diff. We can't verify. So approve c-0.
Is c-0 protected? Memory safety no. Concurrency no. Linkage no. Behavioral/compatibility change — hmm. The comment claims a behavior issue but it's about new functionality, not a change to old behavior. Unused parameter no. Actually protected subject "Behavioral or compatibility change" is about "a message, field, status, or default that the old code produced and the new code no longer does; an altered error path; a counter whose update moved to a different point in the lifecycle." This comment isn't about old vs new code behavior change but rather about a bug in the new behavior. I don't think it falls under protected. Even so, no proof of wrongness → approve.
For c-1: path is `_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig`. The comment claims: when a type is removed and an approver was restricted to only that type, the code converts the approver silently to "Todas as Áreas" and already schedules auto-save.
Looking at the diff in settings file:
```
function syncAllApproverAreaSelects() {
...
Array.prototype.forEach.call(approverList.querySelectorAll('.gov-auth-approver-row'), function (row) {
if (row.getAttribute('data-all-areas') !== '1') {
var kept = collectAreaKeys(row).filter(function (key) {
return !!allowed[labelKey(key)];
}).map(function (key) {
return allowed[labelKey(key)];
});
setRowAreas(row, kept.length === 0, kept);
} else {
rebuildApproverAreaSelect(row);
}
});
}
```
And setRowAreas: when kept.length===0 → allAreas=true → "Todas as Áreas". So converting to all areas. But wait — the comment says "já agenda o salvamento automático" (already schedules auto-save). Let's check: syncAllApproverAreaSelects is called from addTypeChip and from typeChips click handler after removal:
```
typeChips.addEventListener('click', function (event) {
...
chip.remove();
syncAllApproverAreaSelects();
scheduleSave();
});
```
Yes, after removing a chip, syncAllApproverAreaSelects() then scheduleSave(). But setRowAreas itself doesn't schedule save. And syncAllApproverAreaSelects itself doesn't schedule save. However, the caller in the type removal case calls scheduleSave after. Also, is syncAllApproverAreaSelects called from any other place that triggers save? Let me search. syncAllApproverAreaSelects is called in addTypeChip (followed by scheduleSave), and in type removal click handler (followed by scheduleSave). Both schedule save.
So the comment's claim about converting to all areas and auto-saving seems consistent with the diff. Is there a contradiction? The comment states behavior that matches diff. Approve.
Wait, but is the comment correct in saying "silenciosamente para 'Todas as Áreas'"? Yes, setRowAreas(row, kept.length === 0, kept) → setRowAreas(row, true, []) essentially allAreas=true. And data-all-areas=1.
But actually, there is a subtlety: syncAllApproverAreaSelects is invoked only when removing a type chip, which happens in the settings tab. But is removal triggered in the settings? Yes.
Does this fall under a protected subject (behavioral change)? It is a reasoning about behavior of new code. There is no proof of wrongness. Approve.
Both comments approve.
Actually wait — let me consider c-1 more: could the comment target code absent from subject diff? No, it's present in the settings file diff. Ground A no. Ground B — no contradicting diff line. Approve.
c-0: the comment's subject is the create file. Code present. Could there be a diff line that contradicts that the injected options are never removed? The reset code calls setAutCriarSelectValue(selectId, '') which calls resetAutCriarCustomSelect(selectId, ''). We can't see whether resetAutCriarCustomSelect removes options — but actually, hmm, is resetAutCriarCustomSelect's purpose just to reset to empty (clear selection) or also clear injected options? We don't know. The claim is plausible. Approve.
So the correct output: approve all.
Tool Calls (1)
approve_all_comments
Show Details
Arguments
{}
Review Comments (8 findings)
templates/governance/authorization/partials/_modal_add_approver.html.twig 1 comments
templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_create.html.twig 3 comments
templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_settings.html.twig 4 comments
No comments match this filter.