Session: 07bd8acb-eb22-4aa2-a383-44f797bfc060

CWD: /var/lib/metahuman-ocr-worker/work/job-92/worktree Branch: HEAD Mode: range From: origin/new_staging2 To: origin/feature/workflow-offboarding-esocial Model: deepseek-v4-flash Duration: 13m5s Files: 8 Status: complete

Coverage

8
Selected
8
Completed
0
Reused
0
Failed
0
Waived

Token Usage

5.9M
Prompt Tokens
113.35K
Completion Tokens
6.01M
Total Tokens
83
LLM Requests
5.62M
Cache Read
0
Cache Write
1
LLM Failures
File breakdown 3 files
FilePromptCompletionCache ReadCache WriteTotal
config/automations/offboarding.yaml,migrations/Version202609… 4.87M 84.06K 4.65M0 4.95M
src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php,templates/company… 1.03M 22.61K 976K0 1.05M
File Grouping 431 6.68K 00 7.11K

Review Comments (7 findings)

Severity:
Category:
migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php 2 comments
security medium L39-L42
A migration semeia produto, template e automações de offboarding em todas as empresas que possuem o workflow `fluxo-de-saida`, sem verificar se cada empresa tem o módulo offboarding habilitado (o acesso é controlado por empresa via service package/features, ex.: `ServicePackage::FEATURES['offboarding']` e `CompanyAppVisibilityService`). Em produção isso pode liberar o fluxo de offboarding e a criação de rascunho S-2299 (inclusive gerando eventos eSocial oficiais) para clientes que não contrataram o módulo, e dificulta rollback seletivo por tenant. Confirmar se a intenção é mesmo global; se houver regra de elegibilidade por empresa, aplicar o mesmo filtro aqui antes do INSERT, ou ao menos deixar explícito no doc e no plano de validação por empresa que o seed é intencional para todos os tenants.
Existing Code
        $workflowRows = $this->connection->fetchAllAssociative(
            'SELECT id, company_id FROM workflows WHERE slug = :slug',
            ['slug' => self::WORKFLOW_SLUG]
        );
maintainability low L153-L159
Para empresas que já usam o fluxo de saída, esta rotina sobrescreve a ordem atual do produto offboarding (UPDATE ... SET order_index = 0) mesmo quando a linha de vínculo produto-workflow já existia antes da migration. Isso altera a configuração corrente desses fluxos sem necessidade para semear o template — em fluxos com mais de um produto pode reordenar etapas/colunas e causar regressão fora do escopo da PR. Sugiro preservar o order_index existente e atribuir a ordem apenas na inserção de linha nova.
Existing Code
        if ($exists > 0) {
            $this->connection->executeStatement(
                'UPDATE workflow_products SET order_index = :orderIndex WHERE id = :id',
                ['orderIndex' => $orderIndex, 'id' => $exists]
            );
            return;
        }
src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php 5 comments
maintainability medium L15265-L15267
A criação e o preenchimento do evento S-2299 foram implementados dentro deste service, que já é um god object com mais de 15 mil linhas, duplicando o mapeamento de campos que já existe em `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::saveEventS2299` (mesmos setters/status 'pendente', criação em modo INC etc.). Duas rotas espelhadas de montagem da mesma entidade tendem a divergir com o tempo (ex.: sanitização de CPF/CNPJ, novos campos, regras de status), e os helpers novos de normalização (`dateOrNull`, `cpfOrNull`, `onlyDigits`, etc.) provavelmente já existem em outros pontos do código. O recomendado é extrair toda a lógica de rascunho S-2299 (criar/buscar/atualizar evento + montar payload) para um serviço dedicado de offboarding→eSocial que reutilize o repositório existente, em vez de manter ~500 linhas novas concentradas aqui; isso também facilita testes isolados dos ramos de negócio.
Existing Code
    private function createEsocialS2299DraftEvent(Company $company, EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador): EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
    {
        $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
bug medium L15226-L15227
Quando já existe um rascunho pendente de S-2299 criado fora desta automação — por exemplo, salvo manualmente na aba de desligamento/eSocial do colaborador, que também grava com status `pendente` via `saveEventS2299` — esta busca ignora eventos pendentes e a busca por `sourceMetadata` só encontra eventos criados pela própria automação em execuções anteriores. Resultado prático: a ação cria um segundo evento pendente para o mesmo desligamento, contrariando a premissa de idempotência descrita na PR e podendo gerar S-2299 duplicado no envio oficial. Ajustar para localizar e reaproveitar (atualizar) eventos pendentes do mesmo colaborador/data de desligamento, ou tratar explicitamente esse caso como evento já existente.
Existing Code
            ->andWhere('event.status != :pendingStatus')
            ->setParameter('company', $company)
bug low L15001
Na reexecução (evento pendente já localizado), o payload só preenche campos vazios (`onlyEmptyFields = true`). Se a data de desligamento ou outro dado mudar no offboarding depois da primeira execução, o rascunho mantém o valor antigo mesmo assim — enquanto a notificação e o retorno dizem que o rascunho foi "atualizado a partir do offboarding". Definir a regra de forma explícita: ou o rascunho reflete os dados atuais do offboarding (sobrescrevendo campos), ou a mensagem deve deixar claro que apenas campos vazios foram preenchidos para não induzir o responsável ao erro de achar que a mudança foi propagada.
Existing Code
                        $this->applyEsocialS2299Payload($event, $payload, $eventStatus === 'updated');
test low L14927
Lógica nova de negócio com persistência e notificação (criação/atualização do draft, casos de dados eSocial ausentes, evento já oficial, idempotência e isolamento por empresa) não tem teste automatizado; a única mudança em testes desta PR é um ajuste de nome/campo num teste de SSMA não relacionado. Recomendo adicionar testes unitários/integração cobrindo esses ramos antes do merge, especialmente o cenário de evento pendente pré-existente (evitar duplicidade) e o de reexecução com dados alterados.
Existing Code
    private function executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
bug medium L14990
Se a data de desligamento do offboarding mudar depois que o rascunho pendente foi criado por esta própria automação, o rascunho antigo não é mais encontrado: a busca pelo evento via metadados compara a data e falha, e a busca seguinte ignora eventos pendentes (filtro status != 'pendente'). O resultado é a criação de um segundo rascunho pendente, deixando o anterior órfão e duplicando eventos S-2299 para o mesmo colaborador — exatamente o que a regra de idempotência declarada na PR queria evitar. Sugiro localizar o rascunho pendente vinculado ao colaborador sem depender da data, atualizando os campos no lugar (ou inativando o antigo) quando a data for alterada.
Existing Code
                        $event = $this->findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal($company, $esocialTrabalhador, $remuneracao, $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate());
Files Reviewed 8 files
  • config/automations/offboarding.yaml
  • templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig
  • tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php
  • migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
  • templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig
  • src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
  • templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig
  • src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Session Tasks 1 tasks
File Grouping 1 requests

grouping_task

Request #1 deepseek-v4-flash P:431 C:6.68K 52406ms
Reasoning
We need answer JSON array grouping. Need think semantic. Need output only JSON. Need group changed files. Files: - config/automations/offboarding.yaml - migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php - src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php - src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php - templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig - templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig - templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig - tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php Need infer. Offboarding.yaml + migration seeding offboarding esocial flow template related. AutomationExecutionService massive modifications likely handles automations/offboarding, EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento? Entity changed. Templates company member guides esocial termino motivo desligamento (employee offboarding reason) and decision system automations list + flow detail. Test SsmaEventValidator likely validation of event. Need group semantically. Let's inspect content? Only paths. Need create groups. Possible: Group "Offboarding eSocial flow templates and automation execution" includes config/automations/offboarding.yaml, migration, AutomationExecutionService.php, perhaps templates? Hmm modifications to templates in decision system list/flow_detail +1 display something maybe related to new automation? But yes. Group "eSocial termination event entity and member guide" includes Entity EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento and motivo_desligamento template. Group "tests" maybe with validation? Could include Ssma test and maybe entity? But tests can be with unit. Need every file exactly one group. Let's reason: Migration seeds offboarding eSocial flow template. It likely references config/automations/offboarding.yaml. Service AutomationExecutionService is core runner modified to support offboarding?? Entity EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento modified maybe adding motivo? Template motivo_desligamento +1, test updated. All related to S2299? Let's identify domain: EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento = eSocial event for employment termination. Offboarding = employee termination. "Motivo desligamento" in template - reason for termination. SsmaEventValidatorTest probably validates S2299? Ssma maybe social security? Let's examine relation. Files paths: config/automations/offboarding.yaml likely defines an automation "offboarding" with steps maybe eSocial S-2299? New migration seeds offboarding eSocial flow template. src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php modified. templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig. src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php modified. templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig, templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig. tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php. Could be one feature: Offboarding eSocial flow template plus automation execution; all changed files perhaps in same group. But grouping guidelines every file in one group, max 10. Could group all into one big "Offboarding eSocial flow implementation" because all related. But maybe desired distinct themes. Need output likely 2-4 groups. Need decide clusters. Let's parse paths deeply. config/automations/offboarding.yaml added? Actually modified +21. There is offboarding automation YAML. Migration added SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate. Thus new eSocial flow template called offboarding maybe. Service AutomationExecutionService modified +491/-5 large. It would execute automation definitions and perhaps process actions, including send offboarding flow? It could be touched by front-end template additions to list/detail to show automation "SSMA" info? Need maybe all changed to product feature. Entity EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento corresponds to "S-2299 - Desligamento" event. Why modified? Could add property based on config? Maybe the offboarding automation uses S2299 event entity. The test SsmaEventValidator changed 2 lines due to entity property. Templates: - company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig = company member guide for eSocial termination, motivo reason. - decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig and flow_detail = automation system UI changes likely to handle new automated flow. Need maybe group by "automation/offboarding" and "eSocial validation" and "frontend/automation UI". Let's inspect names of tests: Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest. Product/Ssma maybe "Social Security Management Automation"? SsmaEventValidator test uses Ssma event validation related to service "SsmaEventValidator" maybe not changed. Entity EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento. Can group with Entity and tests? If test is for an event validator, probably tests constraints on entity, so yes. Need maybe group directories: 1. Automations/offboarding: config/automations/offboarding.yaml, migrations seed, AutomationExecutionService, list_automations template, flow_detail template. This is decision system automation. 2. E-social S2299 termination files: Entity and company member guide template and test. But these are linked to offboarding maybe still. Let's identify relationships by "belong same module/feature". config/automations/offboarding.yaml and migration seed offboarding eSocial flow template. AutomationExecutionService likely new "run automation" used by eSocial flow. Templates list/detail are for "automations" and "flow_detail" likely view of configured automation. More related to service/migration than to Entity? Maybe yes. Could group: - "Offboarding automation flow seed": config/automations/offboarding.yaml, migrations ..., templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig, templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig, src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php. - "S-2299 desligamento event validation": src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php, templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig, tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php. Would that be valid? Need potential relationship: Entity's modification and template motive may also be part of offboarding. But if group criteria: share same module/feature "e-social termino" perhaps entity + template + test. This grouping separates main file count. Does test relate to AutomationExecutionService? The service likely modified to use EventValidator? Could test changes due to service logic? Need investigate. Let's inspect possible diff via paths only impossible. But can infer from tests file path "Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php": If Entity changed, update instantiation. The service AutomationExecutionService probably modified at runtime to execute events, and its code may include "motivo_desligamento" handling. Not known. Maybe all groups should be 3: 1. Offboarding/eSocial flow template seed and config (yaml + migration) 2. Automation execution and management UI (service + templates) 3. S2299 termination event entity, guide and validation test. But migration modifies config + templates maybe. Let's read user says group changed files into semantically related clusters that should be reviewed together. Need no text. Need maximum maybe not required unless. Let's think of "producer/consumer relationships": yaml and migration are consumers/producers of template; entity + template + test maybe. "i18n/config variants". Directory shares. Could group identical shared directory: - config/automations/offboarding.yaml (one) - migrations ... (one) - src/Entity ... + templates/company... maybe same feature; src/Service ... + templates/decision_system... maybe same feature; tests... etc. Maybe we should generate one group per module: A. Offboarding eSocial flow template seeding: offboarding.yaml, migration, templates list_automations + flow_detail? Wait migration DB seeds flow config, list_automations UI display. Need name "eSocial termination automation flow" includes yaml, migration, AutomationExecutionService, decision system templates. Then group "S-2299 event entity and validation" includes entity, company member guide, test. But is AutomationExecutionService more eSocial? It is generic automation execution service, modified 491 lines. Usually can't group without detail. If modified service supports templates/actions, the UI templates are likely related. Let's infer code: File src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php +491/-5 was heavily changed. A service for automation execution. Config/automations/offboarding.yaml "offboarding" may define "triggers" and "actions". Migration seeds a flow template named "offboarding esocial" from config? AutomationExecutionService may execute this flow. Templates list_automations and flow_detail add display for "flow templates" connecting to migration. The service and templates are in decision_system module. Test SsmaEventValidator maybe from "Ssma" not in source changes. Could group them all under "offboarding eSOCIAL automation flow": includes service and UI and template? But if group all then entity/test? Let's consider grouping by change's purpose from PR. The changed files likely represent a single feature: - Added offboarding automation YAML config (event steps). - Added migration to seed offboarding eSocial flow template (probably includes S-2299 event type and "motive termination" options) - Modified EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento entity (probably adds "desligamento motive" option from event) - Modified AutomationExecutionService (execution of offboarding, maybe validates eSocial event?) - Modified company guide template "motivo_desligamento" (explains termination reason in context of offboarding?) - Modified list_automations/flow_detail templates (perhaps updated display to reflect offboarding templates) - Modified SsmaEventValidatorTest due to changed validator? all one feature. Could be an automated offboarding process: When employee terminated, eSocial event S-2299 is triggered; automation service executes on guide pages? Entity changed. Tests updated accordingly. UI list automations + flow_detail add info. This all is one cohesive PR. But requirement grouping maybe asks multiple groups; all files can be group with "offboarding eSocial automation". Is every file semantically related? If yes, output one group with all 8 files. But if broader, okay? Need "clusters". Maybe better not over-split. Need think from instruction examples: "Files in same group typically: Belong to same module/feature; producer/consumer relationships; i18n/config variants; Share same directory and work together". It doesn't require multiple. A group may contain 1 file if unrelated. Max 10. We can output one JSON array of groups. If all belong to same feature, one group is okay. But "should be reviewed together"; maybe all should indeed review together. Yet the test change and template "member_guides..." might connect to automation/offboarding. Let's decide. Let's create robust semantic grouping: Group label: "Offboarding eSocial flow template and execution" Files: - config/automations/offboarding.yaml - migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php - src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php - src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php - templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig - templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig - templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig - tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php All group. But label broad. Would reviewers want separation between migration seed and implementation? A migration of 440 lines seeds data and config/automations updated. AutomationExecutionService huge; templates another concern. Maybe group first three modules? Hmm. Let's inspect "AutomationExecutionService.php" path (src/Service) and "templates/decision_system" has automations and flow_detail. This service likely not specifically offboarding but generic automation engine. But changed 491 lines in service due to new "nested flows"? Need see if related with config automations yaml. The offboarding.yaml is 21 lines added (not 440). Migration seed includes "OffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate" maybe likely reads config? Wait migration cannot read YAML generally. It seeds flow template (option groups, jobs?) from hardcoded data 440 lines. Config/automations/offboarding.yaml likely a config file used to define automation "offboarding" separately? There are multiple automations: perhaps system uses YAML at runtime, and migration seeds old? Hmm. "config/automations/offboarding.yaml (+21/-0)" is modified/added? It says MODIFIED +21 -0? Actually no newline? Maybe in Git diff +21 means 21 added; no deletions. It may be a new file? But marked MODIFIED perhaps existing? not important. "migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php" added 440. This migration seeds DB template. Then "config/automations/offboarding.yaml" probably eSocial "offboarding" automation template source for tests? Need not. Need maybe classify "config/automations/offboarding.yaml" and "migration Version...SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate" as definitely related: same offboarding eSocial flow template. Other groups: - UI and service related to automations: AutomationExecutionService, list_automations, flow_detail. - eSocial event entity has direct link to S2299 / Ssma event validation? Test maybe. - company guide perhaps eSocial termino reason. Let's map: Group1: Offboarding eSocial flow template: config/automations/offboarding.yaml + migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php. Group2: Automation management UI/backend: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php + templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig + templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig. But is service changed for "offboarding" templates?The templates modified +1 line only, adds display element perhaps "product type" to flow detail/list. Service probably changed significantly for "automations" as well. This group is not obviously connected to group1? But all automations. Group3: S-2299 event & guide & tests: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php + templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig + tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php. But group3 contains entity, a template for eSocial termination, and test. The modified no-source test validates event S-2299. They belong to eSocial event. Good. Would group2 be really related to group1? UI changes display list_automations and flow_detail; AutomationExecutionService executes YAML. A likely review should include group1, yaml + migration with service? Hmm if group1 only has config + migration, group2 service/templates are semantically related if the migration seeds flow template used by service. But the "flow_detail" and "list_automations" views show "automations" generally; service changes likely generic and should be reviewed with migration less? We need review all changed files, maybe group by module feature. What is "decision_system"? Could be "Decision System" domain. Config/automations and Service AutomationExecutionService and templates automations all under this. Migration "SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate" also under Decision System maybe. There is a clear grouping by directories: - config/automations/offboarding.yaml - migrations/Version...SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php - src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php - templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig - templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig All are automations (offboarding flow template and decision system). Another: - src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php - templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig - tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php Could be eSocial S-2299 event (legal, doctrine). But if "migration seed offboarding eSocial flow template" and "AutomationExecutionService" are in separate groups, we risk files that should be reviewed together (Migration + service maybe) not in same group. The instructions say "every file exactly one group", "same group typically belongs to same module/feature." Config yaml and migration likely are "offboarding flow template"; service and templates also "automation execution"; group1 and group2 perhaps same module but in different groups? Hmm grouping should not group same module under two labels if they all should be together. But okay if different concerns. Maybe desired grouping from file types: 1. Offboarding flow template seed (config + migration). 2. Automation execution engine and presentation (service + view templates). 3. eSocial S2299 validation (entity + company template + test). Need verify group2 doesn't need tests? The test file Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest likely test for entity. Fine. Let's consider if "templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig" belongs with "automations" because maybe the offboarding flow includes "motivo desligamento" in company member guide and could be changed to +1. It might be generated by the service? Hmm. Entity EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento maps S-2299. The offboarding automation config probably has "eSocial termination" step. It could be a new feature "Offboarding eSocial Event Template" across automations and S2299. Maybe all 8 one cluster. Let's inspect possible line counts: - Entity +4/-4 likely changes property? Could be update choices for "motivo desligamento" in S2299. Template +1 line maybe adds one translation? Test +2/-1 likely updates test dataset due to same motive add. They may all relate to adding/updating a "motivo de desligamento" enum. Automation offboarding config could also add reason "layoff" etc. Migration seed template includes options? Ah yes! - Suppose you need to add new termination reason code in e-social S-2299 (e.g., "0 - Rescindido"), and offboarding automation; modifications in entity/options, test, guide; migration seed template and config; AutomationExecutionService changed to handle? list/flow_detail templates updated to show? This is feature. Need maybe identify groups by "primary actor": - Group "Offboarding eSocial flow template and S-2299 updates" includes all. Label maybe "Offboarding/eSocial S-2299 termination flow". But maybe too broad yet still cohesive. I need likely answer accepted? There is no ground truth; but JSON output groups. We can choose nuanced. Let's build a satisfying grouping with 3 groups. However, need avoid group of one? Can group 1 file if unrelated. But no. Let's think if tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php should be reviewed with src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php. A test for event validator likely directly validates properties or constraints of entity. If entity modified, yes. But if AutomationExecutionService modified many lines and now uses SsmaEventValidator? It could also require test. Which files? The test path has Product/Ssma, maybe "Ssma" could be Social Security Management Automation. The service AutomationExecutionService maybe in namespace "Ssma\Automation", but no source modified "EventValidator" itself. Test changed due to changed entity? Usually a Unit test file needn't be in same group; but if tests directly for entity modifications, yes. But if the test is for "SsmaEventValidator", changed by +2/-1, maybe adjusting namespaces due to entity changed? Hmm. Let's use "semantic clusters that should be reviewed together". If one feature touched multiple layers, group all is reviewable. They should be reviewed together if code and config and migration are coupled. I lean to output 3 groups to be informative. Need maybe include paths exactly. Let's examine "list_automations.html.twig" and "flow_detail.html.twig" are in templates/decision_system. These UI modifications might correspond to "automation flow template" and not directly to eSocial offboarding? They probably display the seeded offboarding flow, so include with group1? If separate, user may lose connection with service. If same group of 5: - config/automations/offboarding.yaml - migration seed - list_automations - flow_detail - src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php This group has 5 files. Then group with entity/test/guide 3. Better: 1 "Offboarding automation flow display/execution" files above. 2 "S-2299 event validation and termination guide" files. Would yaml+migration be with service? yes; list/flow_detail UI too. Entity not in group1 maybe if an entity object is used when service executes eSocial events? Still okay. Maybe more semantically exact: - Offboarding flow templates: yaml config, migration, list_automations template, flow_detail template. - Automation execution service: src/Service AutomationExecutionService.php maybe should pair with offset? It might be backend. Need max 10, fine. Let's investigate "AutomationExecutionService.php" path. There may be UI automations list; decision_system/flow_detail. If "AutomationExecutionService" is a service in a domain called automations, it uses "View templates"? likely. "offboarding.yaml" is config for automations. If reviewing offboarding, you'd review all 5. The company guide and entity likely not part of execution service. Potential grouping by "affected product": 1. Offboarding automation (YAML, migration seed, AutomationExecutionService, list_automations/flow_detail): 5 files. 2. S-2299 eSocial termination validation/UI (Entity, company guide template, ssma test): 3 files. This covers all. Label group2 should include "Esocial S2299EvtDesligamento" not offboarding? But S2299 event desligamento is offboarding; it should group with migration "OffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate"? Hmm. Maybe all belong to "Offboarding/eSocial S2299". Let's not overdo. Let's analyze noun "EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento": desligamento is offboarding. The migration name "SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate" likely creates an "offboarding flow template" with an event S2299? The service executes it. The UI templates show "automations" list/flow detail. That all is definitely offboarding eSocial. Company member guide and test also about e-social termination. If reviewers need the whole PR, output one group. But instructions "Output ONLY JSON array"; no restriction on number. Let's say: [{"label": "Offboarding eSocial flow automation and S-2299 validation", "files": [all 8]}] Would that satisfy? yes. But maybe group should be less large? Max 10, no issue. Yet label "short theme description"; all files in same semantics. But this is code review assistant; grouping should cluster files so reviewer can review "slabs" not necessarily one. Usually grouping changed files into related app modules; with 8 files spread across layers but same PR, all can be one cluster. But need perhaps "Every file appears exactly one group" if output one group yes. Need maybe use labels short. What final json? We can include all 8 one group. But if there are two independent modules, separate groups is preferable. Let's find other possible independent concern: Test path "Unit/Product/Ssma" maybe relates to entity, no source. If that group separate, no file belongs to offboarding? entity is S2299, yes offboarding. Let's consider whether "config/automations/offboarding.yaml" is not part of eSocial event but a general "automation" config. List_automations/flow_detail templates are about automations; AutomationExecutionService is service. Migration seeds a "FlowTemplate" for the decision system. Entity and guide are eSocial domain. If reviewing in separate groups, a developer working on feature must review groups together but sequentially. User asks "semantically related clusters that should be reviewed together", so group together if should review together. A migration/seed and service and UI maybe should be separate from Entity/test? Not sure. Let's read "MODIFIED templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig (+1/-1)" likely adds +1 deleted -1, could be punctuation. Entity +4/-4 small not feature. Test +2/-1 small. Maybe config automations +21. Migration +440 huge. Service +491 huge. Hmm Entity and template/test may be incidental changes unrelated to offboarding? Wait +4/-4 in entity could be new code formatting, not content. Test +2/-1 maybe unused imports. Template +1/-1 maybe typo. The large changes are migration and service. Maybe grouping small modifications based on path, perhaps multiple clusters. Need identify group of config yaml with migration and templates? Let's imagine a migration adds a DB seeded flow template. Service changed to support "flow templates" in automations. `config/automations/offboarding.yaml` likely a fixture/definition for tests? This group is "automation engine for offboarding flow". The small modifications: - Entity EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento +4/-4, template motivo_desligamento +1/-1, test +2/-1. These reside in another domain; possibly unrelated to "automation" except "termination". We can group them under "S-2299 event adjustments". Now list_automations and flow_detail +1 each. They might belong with service? maybe yes. Let's think file paths`templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig` and `templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig`: +1 each maybe include an "automation ID" in display or a CSS class? Those are UI views of "decision system automations" and correspond to service. Maybe group: 1. "Offboarding flow template migration" — offboarding.yaml + migration seed. It is a database/data template. Review together. 2. "Automation execution UI/backend" — Service, list_automations, flow_detail. But Service may consume offboarding yaml and migration; maybe group1+2. 3. "eSocial S-2299 termination event & docs" — Entity, company template, Ssma test. Could include config/migration with service templates in one group, and group3. That is 5+3. I think best balance. But perhaps migration's offboarding template includes "esocial flow template" and company guide's esocial termino content should be grouped with entity; not with service. The migration may link to "flow templates" but not execution service? 440 lines new seeds data may need review with Entity? Since it seeds "EsocialFlowTemplate", not eSocial domain? yes. Let's parse migration filename "SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate". "FlowTemplate" likely "DecisionSystem Flows" product uses `AutomationExecutionService` to execute templates. If code review of a migration that seeds flow template, should probably review with config definition and templates showing flows, not with service? Actually migration's output (a new flow template "offboarding") should be reviewed with service if service code changes to execute it. But listing the same group. Let's consider "AutomationExecutionService.php" 491 additions: Could its content be not related to offboarding? It might be an unrelated change to service, plus yaml/migration add new automation. If unrelated, grouping with config not always. But file "offboarding.yaml" under config/automations and migration "SeedOffboarding..." likely uses the service? Hmm. Let's maybe search memory? This domain "eSocial" from Brazilian labor law, S-2299. "Ssma" could be "Sistema de Saúde e Segurança no Trabalho"? "S-2299" is "comunicacao de desligamento". "Automations/offboarding.yaml" likely defines offboarding checklist automation. "Decision_system" may be "automations" where user can create flows; modified service Automations? Let's infer from names: - `templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig` = automation list in decision system. - `templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig` = flow detail in decision system. This is specific to "automations" module. - `migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php` = Import "flow template" data of offboarding eSocial flow. - `AutomationExecutionService` executes automations. All from automation module. Entity S2299 likely belongs to legacy eSocial module that would be used in automation steps. The `company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig` belongs to "member_guides" not automation. Maybe grouping: 1. "Decision system automation offboarding flow": offboarding.yaml, migration seed, automation service, list_automations template, flow_detail template. 2. "E-social S2299 event desligamento": Entity, member guide template, test. The label in group 1 says offboarding; group2 also offboarding? "termination event" could be review together? But perhaps if entity didn't change as part of automation? Still S2299 is offboarding, but group label "eSocial S-2299 desligamento event". Let's decide final with two groups, probably acceptable. Need output JSON array only. Ensure no extra.
[ { "label": "Offboarding flow automation and decision system UI", "files": [ "config/automations/offboarding.yaml", "migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php", "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig", "templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig" ] }, { "label": "eSocial S-2299 desligamento event validation and guide", "files": [ "src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php", "templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig", "tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php" ] } ]
Conversations 2 files
config/automations/offboarding.yaml,migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php,src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php,templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig,templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig 61 requests

plan_task

Request #1 deepseek-v4-flash P:23.51K C:17.92K CR:1.41K CW:0 156009ms
Reasoning
Let me analyze the code changes carefully. The review group appears to be the files listed before the "Other files changed" note: 1. `config/automations/offboarding.yaml` - adds a new automation action definition 2. `migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php` - new migration seeding flow template 3. `src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php` - adds `create_esocial_s2299_draft` action implementation and system_sender change 4. `templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig` - label added 5. `templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig` - label added Plus other changed files outside review group: `src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php`, `templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig`, `tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php`. Let me think about the risk points: ### migration file analysis The migration is complex. Key risk points: 1. **Multi-tenant isolation**: `SELECT id, company_id FROM workflows WHERE slug = :slug` — queries across all companies. It iterates all workflows with slug 'fluxo-de-saida'. Then it calls `ensureTemplate($companyId, $workflowId...` — the template insert includes company_id. But look at `ensureTemplate`: it checks for template by `workflow_id` + seed_migration. Only one workflow per company presumably. OK. 2. **Idempotence and concurrency**: The migration is non-transactional (`isTransactional(): false`). Each insert checks existence first. But there is a race: if a template already exists with `is_active` but different name? Actually the lookup is only by workflow_id + seed_migration setting. If the seed ran partially... Actually Doctrine migrations track executed migrations; re-running won't happen. But idempotence matters for environments where data manually changed. 3. **`ensureOffboardingStages` risk**: `ensureStage` is called, then `ensureActivity`. The stage lookup uses `LOWER(name)` = LOWER(:name) and `product_slot_index IS NULL`. If user already has stages with same name from manual creation, it reuses them. That could attach automations to user-defined stages unexpectedly? Actually it only inserts automation if not exists by name/trigger/action; OK. 4. **Look at ensureAutomation's SQL insert**: it inserts into `flow_automations` with `flow_template_id = NULL, fixed_stage_type = NULL`. Hmm, but maybe the schema requires flow_template_id? Let me note this as something to verify — the insert sets flow_template_id NULL, fixed_stage_type NULL, but is_active=1. The other columns look fine. Need to check schema defaults/not-null constraints on `flow_automations`. This is a possible issue: `flow_template_id` might be NOT NULL. 5. **The migration's up() early return**: If any table in the list doesn't exist, it `return;` — silently skipping. Doctrine Migration up() should throw? Returning early means migration recorded as executed but nothing happened. For idempotence it's OK-ish, but this pattern means in a fresh DB with missing tables, the seed won't seed, but since all tables are created by install, that's an edge. Not critical. 6. **Potential issue**: `findActiveProductId('offboarding')` checks `active = 1`; ROLLBACK in `down()` checks if product exists regardless of active. Minor inconsistency — a silently skipped up with no template means down does nothing; fine. 7. **The down() DELETE statement**: `DELETE wp FROM workflow_products wp WHERE ...` only when `workflow_product_was_created` was true. It deletes the workflow_product link if no active flow template refs it. But, wait: The decision of whether the link "was created" by this migration — for company with existing workflow and offboarding product NOT linked. But then down deletes workflow_product. But there might be OTHER usages of that workflow_product row (e.g., existing flow templates flagging the product). The NOT EXISTS guard tries to handle this: checks other active flow templates with product. But if the product link is in use by some non-template feature (e.g., BPM process that's running or assignments referencing the workflow_product id), deleting the row may break references with FK or orphaned data. However, the guard checks `active_ft.is_active = 1` — only active templates. If another template is inactive but references it, deleting the workflow product will break FK? If FKs cascade, deleting workflow_product cascades to any template product link referencing it. This is something that deserves investigation with actual schema, but the SQL is only about rows where NOT EXISTS any other active template. Hmm. 8. Also in `down()` — it sets `is_active = 0` on the template but this can break existing running flow instances whose template got deactivated. That's pretty normal for rollback. 9. **`ensureTemplateProduct` slot_index = 0 on new insert set order_index=0 and template_type='fixo'**. Fine. 10. **Automation data duplication issue in migration**: In each stage automation array, there are conditions and actions keys both storing data at top-level AND for actions with config. Actually now that I look: the automation data structures embed `conditions` and `actions` in arrays with full detail. The `ensureAutomation` inserts top-level `trigger_type`, `action_type`, `action_config`, `conditions`, `actions`. OK. 11. **The migration up() inserts products to workflow_products with order_index=0. But if an existing workflow_product was not...** The `ensureWorkflowProduct` will UPDATE order_index = 0, potentially overriding an ordering of existing product. Minor. 12. **The migration is non-transactional** (`isTransactional(): false`) — if insert fails midway, partial data left. Since it's seed data with existence checks, acceptable, but per rules, multi-step write... Actually for migrations this is common; they declared non-transactional because some DDL? No DDL here, just DML. Might be OK. But worth noting: since migration creates records in multiple related tables with explicit IDs/cross references, without transaction it can leave partial seed on error. This is a medium issue at most. Actually rule says "Missing transaction boundaries when a changed multi-step write must be atomic" — a seed touching 7 tables with composition such that re-run may not recover (insert template, then stages for that template, then automations; if interrupted between, next run would reuse the template — because ensureTemplate finds existing one — then stages are the same stage names, no leftover duplication. Actually re-run IS safe because ensure* checks exist. So partial execution recoverable. Good — maybe not an issue. Wait — but actually there's one substantial issue: `up()` iterates over ALL workflows with slug = 'fluxo-de-saida' across all companies and seeds template per company. But does not consider the company's product config of offboarding. Given `workflow_products` — company might not have offboarding product enabled; the migration inserts a product link without checking if the company has the offboarding product entitlement. Then it could present OFFBOARDING product in a workflow for companies that never purchased it. That may be a product/business rule violation... Actually migration is executing in prod for a shared DB; `products` table is presumably the catalog not per company. `workflow_products` link per company. If a company never activated offboarding for the exit workflow, the migration will silently add it, which could ADD charges/visibility to a paid product for companies that didn't buy the module. Since the migration is global in production and modifies all companies' workflows, this is a significant business risk. Wait, is the deployment of migrations on a database shared by all companies? Yes. This may represent the intended behavior ("em workflows de saída existentes") per description: "Cria flow padrão de offboarding com automação de rascunho eSocial S-2299 em workflows de saída existentes." So it is intentional to update existing workflows. But there is still risk of inserting data across companies — worth a medium/high note about verifying per-company entitlement gating. Also the description says created for "workflows de saída existentes" — migrating existing prod data. The migration inserts stages named "Etapa 1 - Preparação" etc. into templates; those names may conflict — LOWER(name) equality reuse. Fine. Let me carefully look at the `down()`: ```php DELETE wp FROM workflow_products wp WHERE wp.product_id = :productId AND wp.workflow_id = (SELECT ft.workflow_id FROM flow_templates ft WHERE ft.id = :templateId) AND NOT EXISTS (...) ``` If template `workflow_product_was_created` false, skip delete. OK. Now the missing subtle bug: **the down() sub-select `WHERE ft.id = :templateId`** only one template. If there are multiple flow templates created by the migration per workflow? Only one per workflow due to `ensureTemplate` unique check. OK. Another subtle bug in down: If migration only ran through part of companies... Not relevant. **Real issue in up()**: `foreach (['company', 'products', ...] as $table) { if (!$this->tableExists($table)) return; }` — but what if the table exists but doesn't have required columns in a partially-deployed environment? Table exists check only; `findActiveProductId` would throw if column missing. Schema mismatch -> migration crash leaving migration marked? Doctrine marks as executed only on success; exception leaves it not executed. Hmm, migrations don't run in transaction mode when `isTransactional=false`, but the up completes; if exception occurs, migration version not recorded, re-running could duplicate if partial inserts happened before exception but with idempotence re-run picks up existing templates. The idempotent checks reuse... re-run would re-insert? If partial happened inside a workflow: ensured workflow product + template, then stages each auto check by name. On re-run, template found, stages found/inserted dedupe. Reasonable. **Issue: `ensureTemplate` find template only by workflow_id and seed_migration settings; if an admin already created a template with same name, a second "Offboarding com eSocial" template is created; ok. **Now let's inspect deeper logical bug in the added PHP service code.** ### AutomationExecutionService new action `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` 1. After `$this->entityManager->flush();` the first time, code: ```php if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) { $metadata = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? []; $metadata['esocialS2299Draft']['eventId'] = $event->getId(); ... } ``` This places an `eventId` after flush; but Entity ID exists after persist + flush... yes fine. But then they call flush again. Minor inefficiency but not bug. But wait: there is **an important data-loss bug potential**: The first flush occurs inside the try after building. But if an event had been newly created and `flush()` assigned the ID only when persisted first flush occurs, then event is dangling because not setEsocialTrabalhador? Let's inspect `createEsocialS2299DraftEvent` — sets modo, company, tpAmb, tpInsc, etc. Does the Event reference required other fields? e.g., dadosRemuneracao and trabalhador and dtDeslig? `applyEsocialS2299Payload` set dtDeslig etc only when provided with values. There may be NOT NULL columns without defaults (`status` is set as pendente). Let me see: `createEsocialS2299DraftEvent` sets: Modo('INC'), company, tpAmb, tpInscTransmissor 1, nrInscTransmissor digits of CNPJ, esocialTrabalhador, indRetif(1), status('pendente'), createdAt. Then in caller, if eventStatus !== existing_not_editable: `setDadosRemuneracao($remuneracao)` and apply payload... Many fields remain null which may violate schema NOT NULL constraints. Need to check entity mapping for `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` and DB schema. If NOT NULL columns like `nr_recibo`, `ind_retif` etc. might have defaults, but as we can't be sure — worth a verification step with code_search on the Entity class. 2. **Notification logic issue with missing data / created event** — when there are `$missing` items (worker/remuneration data missing), the flow builds `$payload` but no event created; later notification title "Dados eSocial pendentes..." says "O S-2299 ainda não foi criado porque faltam..." Good. But wait, there's a subtle problem: when `$esocialTrabalhador` missing, `$missing[] = 'esocial_worker_data'`; when `$remuneracao` missing, `missing[]`. Then metadata stores. But if worker data present and remuneration missing, **event not created**. OK. Then the **`reviewUrl`** generated uses route `my_company_member_manage` with member = companyMember->getId(). But `companyMember` obtained from `$offboardingMember->getCompanyMember()`. This should be fine. 3. Template variable interpolation: `$notificationMessage` uses `{{member_name}}`. In other existing flows, member_name is presumably replaced by the notification system? Let me check `executeNotify` isn't in the diff... The call 'executeNotify' is existing elsewhere; the message strings contain `{{member_name}}` as placeholder — must be replaced by the notify function using context `member_id => the dismissed member`. Indeed they set member_id into context, so the function presumably replaced {{member_name}}. Existing patterns. 4. **The `resolveEsocialS2299Responsible`** checks: `getFlowInstance()?->getFlowResponsible()`. `FlowInstanceMember` may relate to flow instance whose responsible might be the same as configured — good fallback chain with company isolation check only on the configured-id path. In fallback path, flowResponsible is derived from same company via relations — OK. 5. **`dateOrNull`** - date might be invalid; returns null silently; also **timezone**? Not concern. 6. `findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal` **requires `dtDeslig` data match and status != 'pendente'** — this method is called when `$event` from linked metadata not present/pendente? Name says "current dismissal" — returns an official event not pending covering termination. If official event for same date, eventStatus becomes 'existing_not_editable' and form just registers; OK. Now possible bug: **Inconsistency of status property values**. On entity related changes (+4/-4 in Entity EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php - not in this group) — but the changed entity file modifies a field type maybe to string (from commit message "Alterar os tipos de dados dos campos de pensão para string"). We should verify with file_read since it's outside this group but related to `applyEsocialS2299Payload`. If `pensAlim` / `percAliment` are strings now... commit e0765bd200 bugfix changed types to string. `intOrNull` for pensAlim could be an issue if DB column is string. Actually wait: `applyEsocialS2299Payload` uses intOrNull for pensAlim and decimalOrNull for percAliment. Keep in mind. 7. **Big bug candidate**: **Non-idempotence in notification when no event missing**: run once — event status 'created'; run again same day — metadata has eventId, event returned; if status 'pendente', eventStatus 'updated', then applyEsocial... update. It calls `$event->setUpdatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());` Only if event->getStatus() is 'pendente'. Wait — but what if the event exists from the prior run but is now approved/made official (status changed from pendente to something else)? The event can't be edited. Good. But wait, there is a scenario where prior event metadata points to eventId yet `eventStatus` = 'updated', and **the event's status could have been changed to 'enviado'/'assinado' after the first draft while still referenced, then a fresh invocation yields existing_not_editable — informing. OK. 8. **Important possible bug: flush ordering within a transaction and error handling** — `$this->entityManager->flush()` at line after metadata; then later another flush after setting event ID. Not transaction-wrapped; but workflow engine presumably wraps each action? Might not. If insert of Event fails (constraint violation), entityManager may be closed or in inconsistent state. Catch Throwable then log then return error. This pattern returns [failure], and caller decides retries. 9. Potential high: **`$esocialTrabalhador` from repo `findOneBy(['companyMember' => $companyMember])` while also possibly being inactive? Actually there could be multiple records for the same company member (dismissed and re-admitted) — findOneBy picks arbitrary first; might select the wrong current record; if there are soft-deleted/inactive rows order... But given it's an existing approach elsewhere, probably same. 10. **Cross-company isolation**: In `createEsocialS2299DraftEvent`, `nrInscTransmissor` uses company CNPJ digits so data respects company. No user input flows into SQL except values configured. But look at applyEsocialS2299Payload: `$payload['motivoDesligamento']` comes from config (YAML/front configured automation action config), passed via `$config`. The config might contain arbitrary string. It's stored into entity field as string. Then the S-2299 generation uses the value presumably with validation. Stored to DB — no SQL injection risk (ORM parameter). value validation? eSocial S-2299 `mtvDeslig` is a code (e.g. '01'), not free text. The action seeds config `motivoDesligamento` from offboarding reason? Actually pay attention: The draft event's S-2299 field set: `motivo_desligamento` actually the eSocial field is `mtvDeslig` which must be one of codes ... If automation config passes e.g. "Demissão sem justa causa", that's NOT numeric code; the eventual submit official S-2299 will fail because it's pre-filled text used by later validation... Wait now — value applied to entity `setMtvDeslig($this->stringOrNull($payload['motivoDesligamento']))`. If the entity field type maps the eSOCIAL code; check entity mapping needs investigation; if field is mapped to string with numeric code alternative and validators expect codes like "01", a text value would make event invalid and blocked at transmission. This is a domain nuance that deserves verification (code_search how S-2299 offboarding controller/tab loads / event created elsewhere uses a code list mapping from reason). Especially `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::motivo` may be FK? Let me not overreach; plan the search. 11. There's a clear **bug with two concurrent invocations** — duplicates events if two actions run at same time (no lock). eSocial "idempotent" claim — however user uses "employee enters final stage" trigger which can run once per member typically; still stage re-entry can run twice. Between metadata save, not atomic — but for events, second invocation would not find a linked event in metadata if first not finished; but would find via `findExisting...` (only non-pendente search). Hmm — **Even if executed twice sequentially**, second: the metadata is on member after first saved — event found and status updated. So idempotent sequentially. Fine. 12. But there **could be an issue** with the trigger "employee_enters_stage": allowed trigger includes employee_enters_stage and blocked_triggers...; fine. ### process_stage_type / fixed_stage_type columns In migration's `ensureAutomation`, INSERT for `flow_automations` specifies `flow_stage_id` and sets `flow_template_id` NULL, `fixed_stage_type` NULL, plus config fields... and reads stage existence. But in the column list — the INSERT includes columns: (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, fixed_stage_type, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index). Value count = 11, matched. But the entity for Automations may have `id` auto-increment and columns like `is_active` with default. fine. Wait, maybe `flow_automations` shouldn't also be associated with stage of a template directly? Some flow modules require `process_stage_type` etc.? Not needed. ### Issue: "Criar Processo Seletivo ao concluir offboarding" in Etapa 3 (Finalização) but trigger `on_offboarding_complete` Hmm, this automation from migration is a bizarre seed: On the standard S-2299 flow, the final stage has automation "Criar Processo Seletivo ao concluir offboarding" — that triggers offboarding_completed perhaps when all activities complete or offboarding ends — Wait the automation in stage with triggerType `on_offboarding_complete` create process seletivo. And "Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299) ao entrar na etapa final" with on_enter... For offboarding final stage, e-social drafts when entering the stage. OK. ### Potential issue regarding existing templates in real workflows and `offboarding_completed`: not relevant for these diffs. ### Priorities from user rules for the Service (God object): `AutomationExecutionService` already massive (14k+ lines) — new logic adds ~490 more lines of eSocial payload handling, with several private helper methods in the already giant service (duplicating mappings/notifications?). The "greater weight issues" state the service already concentrates lots; new duplicated logic (e.g., many apply...Xxx repeated but only one occurrence). Actually heavier: adds dozens of domain-specific methods (dateOrNull, decimalOrNull, stringOrNull, cpfOrNull etc.) that likely exist elsewhere in the service — `onlyDigits` already existed? It uses `$this->onlyDigits` for CNPJ; existence of onlyDigits earlier? It appears within diff as private, adding to service. The same String normalization likely existing somewhere (e.g., in eSocial generation services). This deserves exploring repetition but maybe okay because the service already follows a pattern. ### Other changed entity modifications `src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php` (+4/-4) — This file is not in review group but we may need to cross-check for type changes not reflected in the code (e.g., pensAlim fields). We can include code_search/file_read tool references in plan, since file_read allows viewing other files changed, though those outside this review group — allowed to check — use file_read_diff with the path (outside review group but still in update). Yes: "Other files changed in this update" are fair to read for cross-check. ### Template changes Trivial addition of labels maps arrays; not risky. But one concern: the label map in flow_detail and list_automations adds in display name; YAML config adds label new action definition with blocked triggers. Potential maintainability only. Low/none. ### YAML Check key typo issue: In YAML "allowed_triggers" and "blocked_triggers" presumably consistent with python? It's PHP but the config is consumed by frontend and other map keys like trigger name "employee_enters_stage" — must match names elsewhere e.g. others actions use `triggers` key? Let me not invent; but can search in the codebase for other YAML references to `allowed_triggers` to confirm whether the key structure (`allowed_triggers`) is consistent with other action entries (e.g., check for existing action declarations containing allowed_triggers/blocked_triggers). If existing actions to compare, we can code_search within config/automations/offboarding.yaml for 'allowed_triggers'? We have no view entire of file but enough to anchor. ### The problem with adding new action: `blocked_triggers` list includes e.g. "offboarding_completed" while allowed employee_enters_stage - in fact action only allowed for on-enter type. Existing config patterns? Check an existing action with similar trigger lists to compare structural correctness (like `create_processo_seletivo` on same file). Use code_search in yaml for "allowed_triggers". ### Also review the **`list_automations` label**: an action type mapping but not include additional generic icon etc; template is safe. ### The final flow mapping label entry `create_esocial_s2299_draft` added but in `flow_detail.html.twig` two map arrays already exist: 'computeAutomationDisplayName' presumably with actions list. And another function for action type descriptions maybe in list_automations. Low maintenance. Now the possibility of a missing test being added — the automation action is complex domain logic, and yet no test references (tests/Unit/... not added in this diff? no new tests file in the diff besides the modified SsmaEventValidatorTest for another reason). Should we flag a medium issue: high-risk logic with no automated test covering scenario? Yes, mention test coverage for executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft and idempotency. Medium. Potential **high severity candidate**: Migration updates *existing production workflows* by inserting offboarding product link and template into every company's exit workflow. If the workflow type slug `fluxo-de-saida` exists across companies, but some companies maintain customized templates: since ensureStage finds stage with same name and product_slot_index null... adding stages into company's **flow template** not their actual workflow instance. It will create flow_templates entries that might show new default template. Templates are curated sets not active instance — okay. But if a workflow already has an *active default template*, an extra template is created; no pointer update; maybe template discovered by order/name. It may present two templates. Impact: medium. ### More specific bugs to evaluate with severity: Look for **the real code error: misuse of `number_format`** in `decimalOrNull`: For percAliment: S-2299 percAliment field has up to 2 decimals. If percentage given as "30,5%" normalized "30.5" then number_format to "30.50"? Actually for floating decimals in eSocial percAliment expects e.g. "30.50" with 2 decimals? eSocial digital format requires up to 2 decimal with exactly 2 digits on XPERT? Usually "30.50". OK. `decimalOrNull('0,5')` yields '0.50'. But there's an issue with input like '1234.56' (dot decimal) without comma: stays '1234.56' number_format two decimals -> '1234.56'. good; with thousands '1.234,56' normalized removes dots -> '1234,56' then exchange decimal -> 1234.56 good. Only digits CPF short-circuit if string like 'abc' -> empty BUT if includes 11 digits, valid. ### Important finding: **User-provided `virtual` eSocial - event creation out of company Esocial Config** Automation creates official event with data only if worker/remuneration data existed. Those are from staging periods? `EsocialDadosRemuneracao` data may be from future payroll closing. When no worker data, they notify missing. Fine. ### Let’s cross-check a hidden data-consistency bug: Execution: after flush, an event creation happened; then `notification` call `executeNotify(..., $member, context)` then return. If `executeNotify` itself triggers DB or calls? Possibly sends chat message inside same request without transaction. Event persisted but if executeNotify throws? executeNotify is within try; if it throws... catch happens AFTER event already persisted/flushed. Return success false with error - but Side effects remain (event created + notification maybe partially). Actually the catch block wraps whole action including notification. Since event+flush occurred before notification, if notification fails due to Throwable, respond error but event is committed. Retrying would then use metadata eventId + status updated (not created) — ok not duplicates but confusion. Not a big bug. ### Where could serious problem occur: **Code config from user for reason?** Offboarding reason to mtvDeslig code mapping never happens; the payload just string. If reasons like "Pedido de demissão" do not correspond eSocial code in field type code. But payload constructed with reason and notify; later in official event, the responsible edits field via Adriana to set actual code; the event draft merely has a **pre-fill**. This mapping requires conversion layer; otherwise they would pre-fill invalid texto into a code-type field (something the Esocial S-2299 generation may later override as motivo may be sourced from another reason list with dropdown of list); confirm offboarding reason field type & code. Let me plan a check: code_search in Entity Offboarding for fields and mapping methods. Maybe there already is an existing mapping from offboarding reason slug to eSocial codes somewhere (esocial). A search of `mtvDeslig` maps helps. ### Another major candidate: In actionNotification, when data are missing (`missing`), the review URL is appended but event never created. `$notificationTitle/payload` not includes issue. Wait, run notification. ### Cross file: template motivo_desligamento update other diff may relate to mtvDeslig validation list etc. ### Language/flags: no i18n. ### The big possible PHP bug typical here: ``` $metadata = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? []; if ($event instanceof ...) { $metadata['esocialS2299Draft']['eventId'] = $event->getId(); ``` No initial `esocialS2299Draft` if metadata had no key? But earlier in method, before flush: ```php $metadata['esocialS2299Draft'] = [... 'eventId' => $event?->getId(), ...]; $member->setSourceMetadata($metadata); flush(); if ($event instanceof ...) { ... } ``` So key exists. ### Verify `getOffboardingFlowResponsible` exists: code_search in Offboarding entity. ### The second Event Status timing potential bug: Scenario: member with re-activated stage: first action created event 'pendente' (id 5) — not edited. Suppose process manager decided 'not to send'? Later offboarding member's `dismissalDate` (data do desligamento) changes (member moves back update date). Second automation runs — metadata event id 5- get event status still 'pendente', eventStatus updated; and apply payload **only empty fields** (because onlyEmptyFields=eventStatus==='updated')- existing value for dataDesligamento NOT overwritten... but dismissal date changed... they don't update to new date but they call setUpdatedAt. This might be desired semantics? The 'updated' applies only empty fields; official date persisted from earlier run continues; cannot rectify. Feels edge-casey; value of payload shouldn’t silently update the date because offboarding data may intentionally differ from draft point... medium/low. ### Review URL route argument usage The route path "my_company_member_manage" given member id — but if this action executed in the **offboarding member** in company B... anyway. Potential **severity medium** issue: Notification message when event official exists: they mention if non-editable event exists, review — how to "confer the situation"? reviewUrl to same member's tab opens the existing event — true. ### Let's check onlyDigits for `nrInscTransmissor`: 14 digits from cnpj company object. ### Where application of `applyEsocialS2299Payload(... onlyEmptyFields=true)` occurs when status 'updated' arises from event whose fields previous run maybe null? It applies every non-null field with only empty; skipping settings set earlier. That makes semantics conflicting with the "updatedAt" timestamp message; minor. ### Core question: Who set data of event field `dataDesligamento`? initial draft created - payload date set new. Good. ### Now map to actual tools to use in the review plan. We must produce a Review plan listing issues ordered high→medium→low, each issue includes at most short description + arrow lines with tools and rationale — not executing them. Let's select scope highest. Potential issues we plan: - **Medium/High: migration mutates all companies' workflows/production data, adding offboarding product without entitlement check per company. Confirm business intent.** severity medium? If company has offboarding enabled else product might appear. Since seeding needs to know if the company sells offboarding. Suppose `workflow_products` entries existing trigger product availability for a workflow process: inserting a workflow_product row means the flow exposes offboarding to a company with no offboarding contract or product disabled; could result in the company uses a paid feature. However, this migration only adds in "fluxo-de-saida" workflows; for companies whose offboarding product is inactive at modules-> they have offboarding product link and yet not active? Also modules maybe. flag: migration should only seed when company has the `offboarding` active product? But global flow — product'offboarding' module maybe generic non-purchased functionality. I'd mark medium (business/entitlement, cross-company data mass update on production). Tool: code_search for how products/companies/plans are linked; e.g., code_search in migration/product queries selecting products by company or product_id; file_find products table entity. Also read docs/database-changes/2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template.md for scope indication (maybe docs file not listed here but in repo; can mention). - **medium/high: `isTransactional(): false` and multiple dependent inserts of seed; partial failure leaves inconsistent flow** — but recoverable, ensure* methods exist, so likely no. Drop. - **medium: Migration's idempotence gap**: `ensureAutomation` finds automation by name/trigger/action only within same stage. If runner crashes between insertion of stage and insertion of some automations then re-run (after manual version removal) creates missing automation; fine. no bug. - **medium: If user-modified default template stages names (they customized "Etapa 1 - Preparação" name), ensureStage with LOWER(name) match will reuse and adjust? Migrations seeds into existing template—the template is a new template each workflow; user modifications after creation date would use a duplicate template insertion; but existing ones before migration not exist. no conflict. - **High/Medium: no transaction on seed + no lock leads duplicates under parallel deploys** – uncommon. - **AutomationExecutionService 14k god object duplication of helpers. Medium:** per user rules this PR must be flagged first if service huge: mentioned rules priority 1 — “God object/lógica duplicada — maior peso” - Signalize. But this is a rule specific for review writing. We need include as issue probably medium? Actually planning focused on risk points. God service existing before this change; but new code makes it worse by adding ~490 lines. It is a real maintainability risk. We should include a medium issue. - **High candidate — event creation without checking missing not-null required values / not persisted?** Actually creation happens only when worker/remun provided, but other required S-2299 fields may be NOT NULL at DB level with no defaults and would throw at flush: fields like tpInsc? etc. Need to verify entity schema constraints. - **High candidate — business identity of dismissal reason code mismatch:** mtvDeslig receives free string from config, yet S-2299 expects code. Need to verify with how existing S-2299 serializer maps motive. Search references to getMtvDeslig() calls going to XML generation: map or direct? If direct, payload must be code from allowed list — reason-mapped elsewhere. Use code_search `getMtvDeslig|setMtvDeslig` across repo, plus route to offboarding reason mapping. - **Medium candidate — `executeNotify` uses message containing URL appended in HTML with user event? safe because reviewUrl internally built. - **Medium: duplicate code creating Event object:** `createEsocialS2299DraftEvent` duplicates initialization distribution for S-2299 event creation — else if existing code path with same logic in a dedicated service. maybe there is Esocial service that creates S-2299 from official flow. code_search for `new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` to consider extraction. - **Medium: idempotency**: if action runs twice quickly between flush and second run in different request, metadata eventId not persisted until the first ends; effectively single-thread. Fine. - Since current environment could execute action always `updated`, then second run setUpdateAt even no changes causing unnecessary 'draft updated' notification. acceptable. - **Low candidate bug: `status !== 'pendente' => existing_not_editable` while status may also be 'pendente' vs maybe 'rascunho'? Check constants used for the status in that entity: If status allowed values include 'enviado','rejeitado', etc. race. Now high issue: **same draft event could be re-linked if metadata from another member?** They correlate by metadata; multiple FlowInstanceMembers (exit process, internal member migration?) For the person with same company member but two simultaneous offboardings? not relevant. - **Missing cleanup on failure**: catches Throwable after party flush but prior event inserted remain committed; re-running restores metadata. no leak. Let’s read the exact condition: ``` if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $event->getStatus() !== 'pendente') { ``` If first-created event status='pendente'; updated event; after flush; then there is no way to send the pending official event? presumably elsewhere Adriana guides editing etc. - in the final return `notification`: contains notify; inside notification there is `system_sender` generalization - update from payroll-specific to generic by checking config['system_sender'] boolean or source payroll. This impacts payroll notifications? they still generate is_system_sender for payroll members source - identical replacement of variable name. It adds path: config-based sender for any action, could change behavior of an existing action? It only activates if the config contains system_sender true; passed by new action only. no regression. - But consider **$config with 'system_sender' => false and member source payroll:** config false OR payroll => stays true. good. Now templates: only label strings; no risk except typo? Medium none. Now compile tool calls for each issue (from the set: code_search, file_read_diff, file_find). We are not allowed to call; we describe. Let me read the given migration once more for real bugs. - `ensureStage` find stage restricts product_slot_index IS NULL. When you insert flow_stage for a product template — templates may include multiple product slot-specific stages (for product slots). Existing stage from earlier seed may be absent; fine. - In `up`, when there is existing stage with the same name in the template triggered from offboarding creation (ex. default template with "Finalização" assigned etc.) ensureStage uses existing stage id then inserts default activity and automations into user's customized stage (even if that stage had a different structure), possibly modifying the user flow adding actions, anyway user benefits of S-2299. Since template names exactly equal, could mix. This reuse might attach an automation named "Criar Processo Seletivo ao concluir offboarding" to user-customized; but likely acceptable. - **Unique `ensureAutomation`: looks within flow_automations of that stage for same trigger/action/name exact.** Different names possible duplicates. ### Real subtle bug in `down()` SQL: They locate templates by `settings.seed_migration = SEED_KEY`. In `down`, they unset seed_migration and keep rolled_back; if down called twice: after first down, templates no longer match; nothing; idempotent. But never deletes the created **flow_template**'s stages/activities/automations: set is_active=0 only; and removes workflow_products when originally-created. Data of template remain (inactive), fine. What about **flow_template_products rows** created? Not removed. If workflow_product link deleted, active_ftp remains referencing deleted wf row? FK maybe prevents delete? flow_template_products having product_id only and not workflow_id; they remain. the NOT EXISTS guard prevented for active templates but the *template* itself being deactivated is included in itself condition? In the deletion SQL they exclude active_ft.id = templateId; but the current template being rolled back is about to be set inactive in later statement. So safe then deactivate after. But consider another inactive template? If another template is inactive (e.g., user previously deactivated the default or another seed template, from this or other old flow) and it still references the product; deleting workflow_product will break the relation for that inactive template... but the guard only looks at `is_active = 1 AND id <> templateId`. If other active template and product entries maintained, row not deleted. However any inactive previous template referencing product still broken: If flow_template_products references only product_id not workflow_id, unaffected by workflow_products delete. Nevertheless other features referencing workflow_product id: active assignments? Running flows with workflow->workflow_product? deleted relation may affect active flow instances referencing workflow_product id (fixtures) FK constraints may fail deletion (integrity error during migrations) or cause runtime after pieces reference. This delete is guarded to when original insert occurred programmatic. FK risk constitutes medium. Actually **the delete may also fail when events from flows pointing to that product row** — but with reference errors in rollback, down migration needs fallback of "try/catch/skip" to let prod rollback succeed; common approach with deletes should suppress errors. risk. ### Now service: verify actual name use: EsocialDadosRemuneracao repository method: `$this->entityManager->getRepository(EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class)->findByTrabalhador($esocialTrabalhador);` may not exist? This likely already used elsewhere in service? New call: if that repository lacks method, fatal. Search existing references to findByTrabalhador across repo. ### Entity modifications in EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento (+4/-4) — check types but out of group: file_read_diff to ensure setters names/getters used exist; e.g., they call getPensAlim()/setPensAlim with possibly new string type - int conversion? diff not shown. We can read file diff. ### Offboarding entity getter names? They used getOffboarding()->getOffboardingFlowResponsible(), getReason(), getDismissalDate(). Fine. ### Confirm migration table name uniqueness consistent with entity->table names. ### YAML action: New action definition — okay; blocked, allowed fields. Rule: spelling yaml-keys; key 'allowed_triggers' matches existing? code_search in offboarding.yaml for 'allowed_triggers' occurrences comparing structure. Now, potential severity choices planning: 1. **high** — executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft: official event created when event object null with limited initialization can violate NOT NULL constraints in production `esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento` because many domain fields not filled but some DB columns may be not nullable / no defaults; prefill incomplete as draft -> transaction error; verify entity mapping/columns. But note: event status pendente may be stored JSON? Event official created with a full required? Perhaps there is an existing service design where pendente event allows partial. Existing manual flow "rascunho" from Escala maybe sets status to nothing... Let me verify via code_search `new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` existing code to compare initialization of that flow will tell whether minimal init id common or required columns default. Call: code_search 'new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento' => see whether other creation path sets everything. 2. **high/medium** — motivo mapping/value mismatch: campo é código da eSocial mas recebe texto livre do config e reason bruto do offboarding (OffboardingMember getReason). Check validators. Search getMtvDeslig usage. Alternatively perhaps data injected comes from MariaDB text, later validated when assembling XML from EsocialEvent. If the user sets code at UI and action only uses config's motive... If no configured, reason isn't mapped so draft does NOT prefill reason code but mtvDeslig null; correct. 3. **high/medium** — migration seeds into all workloads & companies; also adds product link with entitlement disabled; but also blindly in production. For bug likelihood in scope, medium-high. 4. **medium** — automation/flow seed migration in multiple-statement inserts without transaction (non-transactional) and massive seed in each workflow; partial crashes not recovered. 5. **medium** — rollback in down(): delete workflow_products link may strip existing feature if not checked current-but-inactive template; deletion may also remove relationship used by ongoing flow; should verify references. Actually data lost?? they avoid if another active template; for current inactive template references no issue... Medium-low. 6. **medium** — god object duplication (service) since this method/helpers repeat responsibility. 7. **low** — possible drift: no unit test added covering idempotency/created/updated path despite complexity. 8. **low** — The custom event draft's `apply...` sets only empty-fields in update mode, yet also sets `updatedAt`; creates false notification — plus data cannot be corrected when offboarding DismissalDate changes; but maybe desired (not over-write) => low. 9. Code search method existence likely used elsewhere: find one. Given the review instruction wants issues sorted severity and tool chain for issue. We can add up to max plenty. Better quality: 5-7 issues. Let me search the context more: Which items in other_changed_files may indicate a bug to cross check? * EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php modified +4/-4: commit message "Alterar os tipos de dados dos campos de pensão para 'string' e aprimorar a lógica de notificação" - With change from e.g. int/float to string, automation uses fields via methods to match new entity. We need propose to verify the get/set pairs exist and the new `status` property set constants 'pendente'. * tests changed in one file. ### Building per-issue tool chains. Issue A (Service logic / missing validation likely): Official record S-2299 draft is created as a full persisted entity once after only partial fields and the action instantly returns — actual XML transmission later skips because status 'pendente' — but creating with required missing columns? Verify entity not-null constraints. tools: code_search `class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` file entity attributes via file patterns `src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php`, regex `nullable|Column|type` But we can use file_find or code_search direct. – code_search 'new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento' across repo to compare full setup; confirm row preexisting in actual official generation code with numbers. Issue B (mtvDeslig expected code - business mapping): code_search `'getMtvDeslig|setMtvDeslig|mtvDeslig'` to inspect translator e.g., a map reason=>motivo. Look at templates for option list on termination view; file `templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig` changed: use file_read_diff. Issue C migration global production data / entitlement: tools: code_search 'slug = :slug' in migrations queries maybe existing seeds same pattern confirm precedent. but even if consistent, company-level entitlement check. Also verify company/product activation access patterns: code_search 'offboardingProduct|product.*offboarding|workflow_products' product gating; file_find "Offboarding". Not overdo - each line tool. Issue D down data delete: tools: code_search columns or FK "workflow_product_id" for references (schema/or entities), to assess delete side effects & guard no other FK. Issue E God object: tools: code_search of private method duplicates `dateOrNull/stringOrNull`? e.g. code_search 'function dateOrNull|function decimalOrNull' indicates if only duplicates across entire file. To suggest extraction true duplicates. Issue F Migration code duplication / >400 lines produce god migration but lower. Issue G no test coverage for new behavior/templates around matching label include not necessarily risk. Issue H: race/status comparing string statuses: 'pendente' hard-coded. Same codebase uses constants status? code_search to be certain. Maybe there is a serious **data isolation**: metadata of & Event official for companies — they ensure search by `company`; but createEsocialS2299DraftEvent sets the **EsocialTrabalhador of the company member from same company** good. Check path: `executeNotify` with 'to' => company_member plus company_member_id entity responsible. The **executeNotify** function name existing might interpret target user differently, but likely existing methods set system_sender true to route to Adriana. Wait `isSystemSender` condition picks assistant conversation only if system_sender set/truthy. new action uses **direct company_member** plus `company_member_id`; good. Big possible high bug in this diff: variable `$eventStatus` 'created' assigned after creation while the later `if ($event instanceof ...)` metadata stores. fine. Let me consider a subtle transaction/ORM issue: Since method's event persistence is **not flushed using an ordering dependent on other ongoing unit-of-work**, the flow perhaps wraps in outer transaction that rolls back when the action returns error (later). This standard; etc. But immediate failure mode: If `$event` exists in metadata with eventStatus updating from pendente status but they execute: ``` if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $event->getStatus() !== 'pendente') { eventStatus existing not editable } elseif (instanceof) { $event->setUpdatedAt(...); eventStatus='updated'; } else { use findExisting...} ``` If a `$event` returned from metadata but actually belongs to another pending draft but metadata mismatched members — they had conditional checks. fine. Now the **big thing**: **No `dadosRemuneracao` set due missing state** → OK. Does EsocialS2299 payload creation **validate required data dismissal date/reason**? if event created with dtDeslig null / mtvDeslig null, persist with status pendente acceptable per S-2299 lead list; many prefill error notifications. We should search how Esocial Event 'pendente' / draft is handled elsewhere to check allowed emptiness; but uncertainty after deep exploration okay. The plan must deliver precise review; since we output in Portuguese. Let me also identify actual bug in the notification message interpolation for responsável when member_name irrelevant; context member_id = dismissed person; If template {{member_name}} resolves the **sender**, probably wrong: with system_sender is *Adriana*, maybe name of recipient; But existing executeNotify resolves member_name from 'member_id' placed as dismissed. Good. Review url route "my_company_member_manage" — existing; uses url generate inside service; In console/cron context router may be null (checks `? $this->router :` fallback string) for the reviewUrl when handling in an async job with router injected likely still available. fine. Now specifics on YAML triggers names possibly mismatch because "employee_enters_stage" matches property? code_search in source 'employee_enters_stage' vs translations 'quando_entra_na_etapa etc in action list to confirm the value exists: likely else would break list display at runtime, though labels map in Twig indicate using internal code names. Good add as low. Check config structure near other action `create_processo_seletivo` previously; does that entry use allowed_triggers with plural? use code_search against offboarding.yaml also confirms. Let's put final issue list with clear consistent ordering high first: 1. high — Execução com criação direta de evento eSocial oficial pode quebrar/registrar dado incompleto e gerar consequência tributária (S-2299) difícil detectar; e cheats implementação deve passar por camada de serviço eSocial existente para construção do evento; justificar/criar via reuso do fluxo já usado de S-2299; este metodo repete regra que existe em outro serviço (god object as copy?). We must verify it actually duplicates; but user guidelines bias "God duplicate etc". I need plan phrased around problem with evidence objective line: "A automação instancia o evento S-2299 direto neste service gigante e preenche só alguns campos do payload; campos do domínio eSocial (motivo, datas, substituição, pensão etc.) são repassados como texto livre do config yaml. Não há validação dos códigos aceitos e nem mapeamento do motivo do offboarding para código eSocial; evento 'pendente' provavelmente transacionado com valor inválido." Actually since event in pendente may get manually completed later, invalid prefill... but if subsequent attempt to use this event will run S-2299 generator that validates; an invalid motive could block "Automatic generate" run — good for reviewer to inspect the reason mapping path. 2. high/migration impact: "A migration varre TODAS as empresas e fluxo de saída e adiciona vínculo com produto offboarding + template sem checar se a empresa tem permissão/ativação do produto." Potential legal/business meaning: including a paid product to clients not entitled; data set large in prod. We need correct "produto" definitions: product = offboarding module is free? Not sure. The important caution (whether active or not). Mitigate: filter per company by validation of module permission table user currently checked in PR etc. Call code_search 'offboarding' uses 'products' to see which entity checks when workflow_products must be added. Need locate product enable conditions: search how templates seeded per company usually treated. 3. medium — migration não roda em transação e `up()` retorna cedo se tabela faltar (version marcada com sucesso sem semear). plus idempotência: In migration `ensureTemplate` contains `settings` in search but if company already running migration? recovery ok. More precise problem is **`isTransactional=false` com múltiplos INSERTs em 7 tabelas sem lock sob deploy concorrente e paradas no meio**. State severity medium. 4. medium — down() apaga vínculo workflow_products de forma brusca, pode derrubar association em andamento (não checa instâncias de fluxo ativas/ templates inativos que referenciam), e sem transação; FKs interrupt rollback. 5. medium — Service god object/ duplicate: 500 linhas adicionadas; existence of same helper functions elsewhere? code_search duplicates. Also the creation of event bypassing official service; similar behavior as modules (Esocial Event service) duplication -> divergence. Need arrow: code_search 'new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento', read related S-2299 method existing maybe in this same file earlier further up (could legitimately see the old method in file). Search indicates any duplicated full init existing helps. 6. medium — As alterações de notificação sistêmica via `system_sender: true` mudam o routing da mensagem do destinatário para a conversa da Adriana, num campo que admite qualquer valor vindo do config e ainda usa flag insecure? Wait, isSystemSender generalized; risk that any existing action config with key `system_sender` false remains. Because only new action sets true but config JSON might contain system_sender injected by client template; If client-controlled, user can cause notifications to land in Adriana conversation (not big). Not high. 7. low — Falta cobertura de testes novos da automacao idempotencia vs updated/existing. 8. low — Template label extra additions consistent — no. 9. low: typo/seeding: SQL automatic newlines not an issue. We must decide max 7-9. Also should include mention YAML action trigger allow-block relationship; its own config plain. Verifying existing config keys pattern: In new YAML automation, top-level "config_preset: { to: flow_responsible }" with action execution expects responsable = resolve function's chain tested on configured responsable id null/flowResponsible etc. configPreset maybe used by engine to build automation action config as action 'to' only and responsible? `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` doesn't read `to` value except notification pass responsible. Yet "system_sender" true not in config preset, it's passed in executeAdd code. OK. Another subtle risk: Using the same action id `create_esocial_s2299_draft` in offboarding.yaml, frontend mapping, and execution. **But no mapping about availability in `decision_system` for action for member filter?** existing generic UI flow processes unknown action types maybe. Let me settle final review plan items: Issue 1 high: executing event creation bypassing existing official service ensures missing fields/incomplete prefill — plus failure risks at flush. Suggested tools: → code_search 'new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento' in src to compare the canonical creation path; (search current service/method official draft creation and fields set) → code_search 'setMtvDeslig|mtvDeslig' in src to see mappings/valid codes and to confirm sample text won't return code. → file_read_diff src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php (out of group change group entity last edit). Confirm new/type changes to pens results as string value mapping at every field used. Issue 2 high/medium migration global production data update. Use: → code_search 'flow_templates' insert elsewhere? maybe to see permitted patterns of seeding migration precedent. Better 'workflow_products' where product link is validated by Company contracts. > code_search in "src/" patterns offboarding product check (`'offboarding'` and `Product`) to see if there is an enablement/entitlement gate that migration should respect. Issue 3 medium rollback removing workflow_product link side effects: → search 'workflowProduct' entity relations and references in code (active flow instantiation) to analyze FK risk. Could also be part of issue2. Issue 4 medium `isTransactional=false` no locks + silent returns; should transaction be set to true? describe partial state and no error visibility; seed missed success. Tool: no external usage needed; but call file_read migration already displayed, no tool necessary; maybe code_search migrations other seeds with isTransactional true to suggest pattern. We can keep as no-tool line if obvious; but allow one reference to file_find 'migrations/*' maybe. Issue 5 medium god object duplication/logic distributed eSocial with ~ 490 lines — tools prove duplicate functions: → code_search 'function (dateOrNull|stringOrNull|decimalOrNull|cpfOrNull|booleanStringOrNull)' within file or repo to find previous duplicates to extract. → code_search 'executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft' to verify where action invoked and if tests exist covering it (also low test coverage issue maybe same). Issue 6 medium: When older offboarding member runs again repeatedly and date changed, with existing pendente event only empty prevents correcting updated date and still triggers "atualizado" notification. status is more 'no-op'; wait not major enough for medium. Instead consider the risk of **eventStatus 'updated' isn't synchronized database**: event->setUpdatedAt called but only data persisted later in flush (if status != existing... fine flush occurs). Maybe issue6 better: idempotência da notificação: if the action is re-run (e.g., trigger dispara ao atualizar persona data / member moves back to the final stage), user gets repeated notification and error message “rascunho atualizado” even if nothing changed; plus event *updated* without validate changes. Impact unnecessary work. low/medium. Issue7 low: test missing. Better meaningful issue #6: status "pendente"? string used about `getStatus()` — verify possible case where event after editing by Adriana becomes 'envio' => existing not-editable; to avoid data overwrite; they handle. hmm. Potential real bug possibility #6: **Notification disclosure** — The outcome data stored in sourceMetadata includes companyMemberId, responsible details, event data etc., and frontend receives only aggregate from route; but sourceMetadata publicly displayed in flow detail? Could expose to unauthorized members? It already stores other things. low. Implement review plan in required format in Portuguese, each issue with arrows. Keep to reasonable issues, sort high→medium→low. Also mention Summary at very top; No headings; exactly format as required; no code fences. Now produce final instructions in pt-BR. Ensure not actually invoking, just description and plan. Some issue may not need arrows. For empty result no. Let's produce final summary with 8 issues? Let's choose 7 issues: 1. [high] automacao: envio de motivo e datas em texto/config sem mapping/validation + create direct event — consultar como evento oficial monta e valida (codigo preferencial) — improve reuse. 2. [high] migration mutating all workflows across companies adding product/flow without company/plan check; data e cobrança — has requirements check; and if rerun on template duplicates previously blocked? Potential severe; also migration on production dataset huge vs rollback. Wait: Before classification as high ensure it fits "pode causar segurança/ perda de dados / falha crítica". Given production data editing each tenant; if not intended vs unprivileged product use—business critical. It is strong to high. 3. [medium] `down()` deletes workflow_product rows created... real removal of product link could break foreign keys / active flows, but not with default No FK. I can mark medium. 4. [medium] Down implies NO transação in both up/down; partial: In migration with single companies? yes. Alternatively combine 3 and 4 under migration risks separate. OK. 5. [medium] God object / duplication: execute.* with dozens private helpers in service; existing private helpers duplicated; extraction suggestions with evidence via code_search. 6. [medium] S-2299 with previos event "updated": notificação/ novo update no metadata even no field changed; many admin notifications; low-medium. 7. [low] no automated tests covering the new method incl. idempotency/per-company/update branch. 7 total. Fold the pattern of ''migration seeds stages but ensureStage re-uses same-named stages with product_slot_index IS NULL and may attach automations to user old stage. In fresh instances alone; old ones may actually have stage names from earlier default templates (e.g., default flow template already introduced); reusing and adding automation to existing user custom stage may be OK-ish but changes existing process with only triggered on entering that stage. Seed adding on-enter S-2299 action to existing finalization stage may fire S-2299 even for potential features e.g., for offboarding employees lacking eSocial configurations – the action returns skip (fine). medium. Actually that consider if there is existing "fluxo-de-saida" template with stages, names could conflict and inserted automation altered user stage; also line size but customizing flow means template creation. Now final plan formatting; Arrows for tools include the reason after dash. For issue2 and 3 arrows for code_search. Specific tool searches: Issue 1: → code_search 'new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento' file_patterns ['src/'] — to compare a path used before to instantiate event fully/canonical; possibly in service src. Also find where event sent construct XML. → code_search 'setMtvDeslig|mtvDeslig' file_patterns ['src/', 'templates/'] — checar se motivo é código de lista e se existe mapeamento, para dizer validação. → file_read_diff 'src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php' — conferir tipos/ props novas. Issue 2: code_search 'offboarding' with slug product & gating codes: see how product release/check per Company works in other components. 'src/' '*Product*' could use code_search 'offboarding_product|product_slug|offboarding' scoped enough. We also add file_find 'Product' can locate services, then read those. But better: → code_search 'active = 1' or 'slug = \'offboarding\'? in src/product entities. Search 'offboarding' in directory excluding automation config? Use patterns ['src/','migrations/'] to find entitlement rules for products and how flows filtered per tenant. Issue3 down delete: → code_search 'workflow_product_id' across schema/repositories to confirm FK and usage in running flow references. Issue4 two concerns: → we can read existing similar seed migrations: file_find 'Seed.*FlowTemplate' (only this file), code_search 'isTransactional' in migrations to see common. Issue5: → code_search 'function (onlyDigits|dateOrNull|decimalOrNull|stringOrNull)' patterns ['src/'] to show helpers already exist/duplicates other contexts; also methods `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` invokes only within this service by map and returns; plus other Esocial-specific service exists (file_find 'Esocial' and perhaps extract to dedicated Esocial service) but god object issue is service now bigger. Issue 6 message repeated; tool not required. Issue 7 test: display no test. Respect ordering high first: two high -> next medium -> low. We also include as first issue the Service **god object duplication / missing dedicated Esocial service** could arguably be highest per user priorities; but plan line is the "pre-planned issues"; Still put it second? Role defines order by severity: security/data bug first; god object still medium. The severity of the **configuration/trigger guard** Low; skip. Ensure the summary line describes the scope. Then list exactly each numbered with Spanish? Portuguese only as comments. Potential specification: "sempre pt-BR". So the content below is Portuguese. Description sentences simple first without jargon, then tech specifics come after. Let me rewrite each issue on that style. Let's phrase: Summary: (descrição). Unify statement; concise. 1. [high] ... We must end output nothing else. Comments allowed with arrows. No bullet markers besides. Let’s write. One more nuance: The `other_changed_files` includes entity diff referenced; include file_read_diff within an issue (allowed to read other files). yes. Detailed tools each line at most one arrow. Fine. Also file_read name refers file_read_diff; avoid mistakes. Let's craft: Summary: The PR extends offboarding flows with seeded template provided by migration and executes new action to create eSocial S-2299 draft plus notifies via Adriana. It also sets generic system_sender flag enabling direct-to-assistant conversation notifications and also updates Twig labels. Issues 1.[high] describing migration mass-update across all tenants... could be the highest data integrity: "A migration varre todos os fluxos de saida de todas as empresas sem checar se a empresa usa offboarding; em produção isso vai inserir produtos/vínculo e template em clientes sem contrato". Mitigation: same as applied criteria. tools: → code_search 'offboarding' ['src/'] — localizar como se verifica se uma empresa tem permissão/produto ativo, espelhar o filtro na migration. → file_read_diff migrations/... (already in scope but no). maybe code_search validate has enough; add file_read docs docs/database-changes — but file not available in path listed? Suppose path mentioned by PR author exists; file_find query 'database-changes/2026-09-01' to discover. We don't want redundant. 2 [high] Creating official event direct in service could produce partial. Actually duplicate logic & not validation. Actually high? The official event DB likely stores data from draft semi; producing early draft events in production even with incomplete data could create real records after approval process, but from status-pendente only and editing later; still lower severity "may lead to invalid eSocial submission"... high borderline. Might keep at medium. That leaves exactly one high migration issue: is that potentially too generous? Let's consider more secure: It is a data-related/tenancy data integrity issue: inserting paid product relationship company-wide. yes high qualifies. Then two mediums: event creation direct/duplicado, rollback delete/no transaction combined three. Or we can call issue1 high for data/entitlement, issue2 medium (incomplete events direct persistence risk) because direct official event insertion can produce duplicate/unexpected record inconsistency but handled via matching. Keep medium/high? Since this is a mandatory to prevent failures that might "criar evento para empresa errada"? not. I think: 1 high data/business mass mutation each tenant & product/flow assigned without permission. 2 high? valid: User can place current dismissal behind: If event draft created but not also set `dtDeslig` because `findExisting` etc? no. Let’s evaluate possible function-level crash: if after new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento creation flush lacking required NOT NULL fields — no entity mapping knowledge. The methods to read columns mapping needs for precision before declaring high/medium; we set high only after seeing not nullable. We don't have the declaration visible Now could map columns allow null? not in diff. For review plan, severity must be marked only afterward? The plan can state issue at the level of risk likely. We can present medium risk and tools verify before marking high. But format wants planned severity; plan finalizes review instructions: The issue itself cannot decide after invocation. In planning tasks a pre-analysis expected with "severity" prior. I'll mark it medium since conditions less certain plus the action handles notifications, likely DB defaults allowed. The process in data validation toggles off. Where official service duplicates? Maybe there is no official service that creates S-2299 draft status 'pendente'. In the entity world before this code, pending S-2299 events already generated by an “esocial termination form” save data; probably do not happen until submission from eSocial product/service. Actually there is Controller for S-2299 manage with event list; they'd first instantiate full with known official generation data and S-2299 from onboarding step: Search will validate. Keep [medium]. Need third candidate to cover templates [not above] no complaint. Then final issue list: 1. [high] #migration global. 2. [medium] eSocial event creation: incomplete mapping/validation. 3. [medium] god object drift: maybe #1 priority among service per user? user prioritizes God object FIRST before other findings. But severity order conflicts: god object at medium first? The order within same severity use it first after high maybe fine = position 2 of mediums. But priority guidelines of persona counts *review priorities*, not necessarily severe ordering? The Analysis Rules top-level step order requires ordering by severity high to low. With same severity, our own: choose. Also include it at beginning levels. 4 [medium] Rollback delete? 5 [medium] no transactions + silent return. 6 [low] notificação/idempotência? optional. 7 [low] tests. At most two mediums? Good enough 6 issues plus low. Let me be sure about Issue 4 Rollback: Down only deletes workflow_products if created not because existed — data loss impossible for companies that previously had none. The potential effect: referenced by *some* flows when being created? cannot since migration created later, before running up no workflows ref the row; after up, maybe admins built flows; deleting breaks only when upgrade rolled back while data new created on top of seed — medium. choose not to overpopulate. Finalize high issue plus the three substantive mediums + idempotency/update notification + test lines( low) = six. Issue descriptions in Portuguese, order: 1 high; 2 medium event direct; 3 medium god service; 4 migration non transactional/partial/return early; 5 migration rollback delete side effect; 6 low repeated notification for no changes & test missing maybe separate 7. Let's build final. Text formatting: uses `→` guidance lines, exactly; ensure descriptions include problem location/impact/solution. Also, mention the template labels low? Omit listing; ensure YAML naming no typo. But "Each issue" maybe requires risk not found... Add low issue about `system_sender` param generic — hmm no. Given file templates adding label maps belong to scope; no issues. Low issue #6: Falta teste automatizado nem unidade idempotência; suggestion next arrow code_search existing test for execute* sample to emulate. Let's write. Second read of first statement "migration mutating all companies": In requirements text exactly says "cria flow... em workflows de saída existentes". deliberate, so declare high only if company's permission not considered. Reviewer must confirm whether this global change intention is known from docs. If docs mention, downgrades to medium. Keep high? The effect when all workfows include offboarding maybe matches policy "workflow fluxo de saida is the product in all customers subscribed to produit flow?" Data in multi-tenant: all customers including non-offboarding users may see the new template. Whether paid: not necessarily because many flows includes free feature. Perhaps classify as medium/high with concern caused actual: inserting product/flow across **every** company not allowed by offboarding feature could trigger unwanted eSocial notifications / data for non-active? Actually does action run only if EsocialMode enabled? For clients without eSocial, default final stage: the action *skips* because esocial disabled → harmless. Yet visual template adds it. This risk moderate. Mark high? Actually product link might enable offboarding complexity to all exit workflows — potential but not config-level unexpected hidden upsell; those matters business decide, not high? In Brazilian context? Products gating more relevant to revenue — I still keep this [high] view: production data/entitlement modification cannot casually pass review and requires explicitly acknowledged; severity high fits "failure of tenants scope". Potential requirement reviewer might place medium due documentation. But I have strong concern; severity in plan only. Now craft final answer ensuring all lines. Do not include extra notes outside structure. Output in Portuguese now with correct summary.
Summary: Esta mudança adiciona a automação `create_esocial_s2299_draft` ao produto offboarding, cria uma migration que semeia o template "Offboarding com eSocial (S-2299)" em todos os workflows de saída existentes e implementa a execução dessa ação no `AutomationExecutionService`, incluindo persistência do evento em `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento`, registro de auditoria em `sourceMetadata` e notificação via Adriana com o novo flag `system_sender`. Os templates de automação apenas ganham rótulos de exibição para o novo tipo de ação. Issues 1. [high] A migration varre a tabela `workflows` sem filtro de empresa e insere, para todas as companhias que possuem o fluxo de saída, o vínculo com o produto offboarding (`workflow_products`), o template, etapas, atividade e automações — inclusive para clientes que não contrataram ou não ativaram offboarding. Em produção isso altera dados de todas as tenancies de uma só vez e pode expor produto/etapas/automações a quem não deveria usá-las, além de dificultar rollback seletivo. É preciso confirmar se existe uma regra de elegibilidade por empresa (produto ativo/contrato) e, se existir, aplicar o mesmo filtro antes de semear; caso a intenção seja realmente global, isso precisa estar explícito na documentação da migration, com plano de validação por empresa. → code_search offboarding em src/ e migrations/ — localizar como o sistema verifica se uma empresa tem o produto offboarding ativo/permitido para reproduzir o mesmo critério na migration → file_find database-changes — localizar a documentação `docs/database-changes/2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template.md` e conferir se o impacto por tenancy/permissão está previsto 2. [medium] A nova ação grava um evento oficial de desligamento eSocial diretamente neste service, preenchendo apenas os campos do payload e aceitando valores livres de configuração (ex.: motivo do desligamento como texto), sem passar pela validação/mapeamento usados na criação oficial do S-2299 nem conferir restrições de coluna da entidade. Isso pode persistir rascunho com conteúdo inválido para a eSocial (código de motivo incorreto, datas/formatações fora do padrão) e, dependendo de constraints NOT NULL da tabela, quebrar a execução ou gerar evento que posteriormente falha no envio. É preciso reaproveitar o fluxo/validação existente de S-2299 ou, no mínimo, validar os valores antes de persistir. → code_search 'new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento' em src/ — comparar com o caminho canônico de criação do evento para ver campos obrigatórios e fluxo de validação já existente → code_search 'setMtvDeslig|mtvDeslig' em src/ e templates/ — confirmar se o campo espera código de lista fechada e se existe mapeamento do motivo do offboarding para o código eSocial → file_read_diff src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php — conferir os tipos e constraints dos campos alterados no diff (pensão etc.) e se os setters usados são compatíveis 3. [medium] O service `AutomationExecutionService` já é um god object com mais de 14 mil linhas e esta PR adiciona aproximadamente 500 linhas novas — incluindo helpers genéricos de normalização (`dateOrNull`, `stringOrNull`, `intOrNull`, `decimalOrNull`, `cpfOrNull`, `onlyDigits`) e a lógica completa de montagem/persistência de um evento eSocial — repetindo responsabilidade que já deveria viver em um serviço dedicado de eSocial/offboarding. Isso aumenta o risco de divergência futura de regra e dificulta testes e manutenção. O recomendado é extrair a criação/atualização do rascunho S-2299 para um serviço próprio e reaproveitar helpers já existentes em vez de duplicá-los. → code_search 'function (dateOrNull|stringOrNull|intOrNull|decimalOrNull|cpfOrNull|onlyDigits)' em src/ — verificar se esses helpers já existem em outros pontos e podem ser reaproveitados → code_search 'new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento' em src/ — identificar o serviço/ator que hoje centraliza a criação de eventos S-2299 para onde a lógica deveria migrar → file_find EsocialService — localizar serviços eSocial existentes que já cuidam da criação/validação de eventos de desligamento 4. [medium] A migration roda sem transação (`isTransactional(): false`) e o `up()` retorna silenciosamente se qualquer tabela da lista não existir, marcando a versão como aplicada sem semear nada; além disso, os INSERTs em `workflow_products`, `flow_templates`, `flow_stages`, `flow_activities` e `flow_automations` não ficam atômicos. Se ocorrer falha no meio em produção, fica um seed parcial e o operador pode não perceber que o template não foi criado. O ideal é tornar o seed transacional ou, se houver motivo para não ser, capturar/logar explicitamente a inconsistência e garantir que a re-execução reconstrua exatamente o estado esperado. → code_search 'isTransactional' em migrations/ — ver o padrão usado pelas demais migrations de seed para avaliar se transação é viável → file_find Seed .*Migration em migrations/ — comparar com outras migrations de seed existentes e como lidam com falha parcial 5. [medium] No `down()`, a migration apaga o vínculo `workflow_products` criado pelo seed quando nenhum outro template ativo usa o produto, mas não considera referências indiretas — por exemplo, instâncias/fluxos já em andamento que apontam para esse vínculo ou templates inativos que ainda o referenciam. Dependendo das constraints do banco, o DELETE pode falhar e abortar o rollback, ou pode remover dado que outro recurso ainda usa. Antes de apagar, é preciso mapear referências de `workflow_product` em entidades/consultas ativas e tratar o erro de exclusão de forma controlada. → code_search 'workflow_product' em src/ — mapear entidades, FKs e consultas que referenciam o vínculo e seriam afetadas pelo DELETE → code_search 'workflow_products' em migrations/ — verificar se migrations anteriores já removem esses vínculos e como tratam dependências 6. [low] A automação não possui teste automatizado cobrindo os ramos críticos — criação nova, atualização de evento pendente, evento oficial já existente, dados eSocial ausentes, isolamento por empresa e idempotência — apesar de ser lógica nova de negócio com persistência e notificação. A PR altera um teste não relacionado, mas não adiciona cobertura para o comportamento novo. É recomendado incluir teste unitário/integração para esses cenários antes do merge. → code_search 'executeCreateProcessoSeletivo|executeNotify|Execute.*Draft' em tests/ — identificar padrão de teste usado para automações existentes e replicar para o novo método → file_find AutomationExecutionServiceTest — verificar se já existe suíte para o service e onde encaixar os novos cenários

main_task

Request #1 deepseek-v4-flash P:26.52K C:315 CR:2.69K CW:0 3264ms
Reasoning
Let me start by reviewing the changes. I need to review each file in the review_files group: 1. `config/automations/offboarding.yaml` - adds new action config 2. `migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php` - new migration file 3. `src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php` - adds execution logic for new automation 4. `templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig` - adds label 5. `templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig` - adds label Let me investigate the key issues. Let me start by exploring the context. Let me check the related files and search for the questions in the review plan. First, let me look at the migration file more carefully, particularly around the concern about tenancy isolation. Let me start gathering context via searches.
Tool Calls (3)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento"}
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
65|        $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();

File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 1
15267|        $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();

code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "setMtvDeslig"}
File: src/DataFixtures/EsocialRelacTipoValorFGTSCategoriaOrigemIncidFGTSECondicaoFixtures.php
Match lines: 4
24|                $existingData->setMtvDeslig(array($data['mtvDeslig']));
25|                $existingData->setMtvDesligTSV(array($data['mtvDesligTSV']));
35|                $entity->setMtvDeslig(array($data['mtvDeslig']));
36|                $entity->setMtvDesligTSV(array($data['mtvDesligTSV']));

File: src/Entity/EsocialRelacTpValorFGTSCategOrigemIncidFGTSECondicao.php
Match lines: 2
131|    public function setMtvDeslig(?array $mtvDeslig): self
143|    public function setMtvDesligTSV(?array $mtvDesligTSV): self

File: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
Match lines: 1
137|    public function setMtvDeslig(?string $mtvDeslig): self

File: src/Entity/EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino.php
Match lines: 1
93|    public function setMtvDesligTsv(?string $mtvDesligTsv): self

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
75|        $event->setMtvDeslig($data['motivoDesligamento'] ?? null);

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2399EvtTsvTerminoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
76|        $event->setMtvDesligTsv($data['motivoDesligamento']);

File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 1
15283|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getMtvDeslig(), fn ($value) => $event->setMtvDeslig($value), $this->stringOrNull($payload['motivoDesligamento'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);

file_find
Show Details
{"query_name": "database-changes"}
docs/database-changes/2026-06-13-empresas-parceiras-contractor.md
docs/database-changes/2026-07-08-interview-template-terms-cpf-ip.md
docs/database-changes/2026-07-10-interview-researchers.md
docs/database-changes/2026-07-12-text-to-bpmn-conversation-workflow.md
docs/database-changes/2026-07-13-interview-template-client-integration.md
docs/database-changes/2026-07-13-interview-template-external-survey.md
docs/database-changes/2026-07-13-interview-template-integration-token.md
docs/database-changes/2026-07-14-interview-media-interaction-definition.md
docs/database-changes/2026-07-23-service-package-apps-catalog.md
docs/database-changes/2026-07-30-invitation-temp-password.md
docs/database-changes/2026-07-31-company-workarea-loading.md
docs/database-changes/2026-07-31-member-import-batch.md
docs/database-changes/2026-08-03-service-package-extras.md
docs/database-changes/2026-08-05-escalas-e-turnos.md
docs/database-changes/2026-08-06-goal-cycle-check-in-frequency.md
docs/database-changes/2026-08-07-gestao-carreiras-roles.md
docs/database-changes/2026-08-11-project-mention-automation.md
docs/database-changes/2026-08-11-ssma-direito-de-recusa.md
docs/database-changes/2026-08-12-goal-description-text.md
docs/database-changes/2026-08-12-project-task-custom-fields.md
docs/database-changes/2026-08-13-conversation-domain-state.md
docs/database-changes/2026-08-14-company-home-hero-image.md
docs/database-changes/2026-08-14-contractor-requirement-instances.md
docs/database-changes/2026-08-14-contractor-requirement-optional-responsible.md
docs/database-changes/2026-08-16-company-workarea-loading-bg-image.md
docs/database-changes/2026-08-17-delete-company-96-account-profiles.md
docs/database-changes/2026-08-18-project-custom-fields.md
docs/database-changes/2026-08-21-project-collaborator-permissions.md
docs/database-changes/2026-08-23-demo-dataset-manifest.md
docs/database-changes/2026-08-28-interview-template-interaction-mode.md
docs/database-changes/2026-08-31-ssma-cause-tree-state.md
docs/database-changes/2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template.md
docs/database-changes/20260703-ssma-occurrence-create-permission.md
docs/database-changes/20260715-company-area-organizational-structure.md
docs/database-changes/20260715-seed-catalog-areas-atuacao-especialidades.md
docs/database-changes/20260716-add-company-area-parent-id-if-missing.md
docs/database-changes/README.md
Request #2 deepseek-v4-flash P:28.19K C:147 CR:26.75K CW:0 2333ms
Reasoning
Let me look at the canonical creation of EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento in the repository, and the documentation file, and the entity to understand field types/constraints.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php"}
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php (Total lines: 296)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-296
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Repository;
4|
5|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
6|use Doctrine\Bundle\DoctrineBundle\Repository\ServiceEntityRepository;
7|use Doctrine\ORM\OptimisticLockException;
8|use Doctrine\ORM\ORMException;
9|use Doctrine\Persistence\ManagerRegistry;
10|
11|/**
12| * @extends ServiceEntityRepository<EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento>
13| *
14| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento|null find($id, $lockMode = null, $lockVersion = null)
15| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento|null findOneBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null)
16| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[]    findAll()
17| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[]    findBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null, $limit = null, $offset = null)
18| */
19|class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository extends ServiceEntityRepository
20|{
21|    public function __construct(ManagerRegistry $registry)
22|    {
23|        parent::__construct($registry, EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class);
24|    }
25|
26|    /**
27|     * @throws ORMException
28|     * @throws OptimisticLockException
29|     */
30|    public function add(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $entity, bool $flush = true): void
31|    {
32|        $this->_em->persist($entity);
33|        if ($flush) {
34|            $this->_em->flush();
35|        }
36|    }
37|
38|    /**
39|     * @throws ORMException
40|     * @throws OptimisticLockException
41|     */
42|    public function remove(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $entity, bool $flush = true): void
43|    {
44|        $this->_em->remove($entity);
45|        if ($flush) {
46|            $this->_em->flush();
47|        }
48|    }
49|
50|    function sanitizeCNPJ($cnpj) {
51|        return preg_replace('/\D/', '', $cnpj);
52|    }
53|
54|    function sanitizeCPF($cpf) {
55|        return preg_replace('/\D/', '', $cpf);
56|    }
57|
58|    private function buildDateOrNull(?string $date): ?\DateTime
59|    {
60|        return !empty($date) ? new \DateTime($date) : null;
61|    }
62|
63|    public function saveEventS2299($esocialDadosTrabalhador, $data, $company, $dadosRemuneracao): EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
64|    {
65|        $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
66|        $event->setModo( 'INC');
67|        $event->setCompany($company);
68|        $event->setTpAmb($company->getEsocialMode() ?? '2');
69|        $event->setTpInscTransmissor(1);
70|        $event->setNrInscTransmissor($this->sanitizeCNPJ($company->getCnpj()));
71|        $event->setEsocialTrabalhador($esocialDadosTrabalhador);
72|        $event->setIndRetif(1);
73|        $event->setStatus('pendente');
74|        $event->setCreatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
75|        $event->setMtvDeslig($data['motivoDesligamento'] ?? null);
76|        $event->setDtDeslig($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataDesligamento']) ?? null);
77|        $event->setDtAvPrv($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataConcessaoAviso']) ?? null);
78|        $event->setIndPagtoApi($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N');
79|        $event->setDtProjFimApi($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataTerminoAviso']) ?? null);
80|        $event->setPensAlim($data['pensAlim'] ?? null);
81|        $event->setPercAliment($data['percAliment'] ?? null);
82|        $event->setVrAlim($data['vrAlim'] ?? null);
83|        $event->setNrProcTrab($data['numeroProcesso'] ?? null);
84|        $event->setIndPdv($data['indPdv'] ?? null);
85|        $event->setCpfSubstituto($this->sanitizeCPF($data['cpfSubstituto']) ?? null);
86|        $event->setDtNascto($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataNascimentoTitular']) ?? null);
87|        $event->setNovoCpf($this->sanitizeCPF($data['novoCpfTrabalhador']) ?? null);
88|        $event->setIndRemun($data['indRemun'] ?? null);
89|        $event->setDtFimRemun($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dtFimRemun']) ?? null);
90|        $event->setInsConsig($data['matriculaInstituicao'] ?? null);
91|        $event->setNrContr($data['numeroContrato'] ?? null);
92|        $event->setDadosRemuneracao($dadosRemuneracao);
93|
94|        $this->add($event);
95|
96|        return $event;
97|    }
98|
99|    /**
100|     * Extrai todos os dados do evento S-2299 para formatação no FlowableVariablesService
101|     * 
102|     * @param int $eventId ID do evento (EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento)
103|     * @return array|null Dados estruturados do evento e relacionamentos, ou null se não encontrado
104|     */
105|    public function getFlowableDataForTemplate(int $eventId): ?array
106|    {
107|        $event = $this->find($eventId);
108|        
109|        if (!$event) {
110|            return null;
111|        }
112|        
113|        // Extrair dados principais do evento
114|        $data = [
115|            'id' => $event->getId(),
116|            'mtvDeslig' => $event->getMtvDeslig(),
117|            'dtDeslig' => $event->getDtDeslig()?->format('Y-m-d'),
118|            'dtAvPrv' => $event->getDtAvPrv()?->format('Y-m-d'),
119|            'indPagtoApi' => $event->getIndPagtoApi(),
120|            'dtProjFimApi' => $event->getDtProjFimApi()?->format('Y-m-d'),
121|            'pensAlim' => $event->getPensAlim(),
122|            'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),
123|            'vrAlim' => $event->getVrAlim(),
124|            'nrProcTrab' => $event->getNrProcTrab(),
125|            'indPdv' => $event->getIndPdv(),
126|            'cpfSubstituto' => $event->getCpfSubstituto(),
127|            'dtNascto' => $event->getDtNascto()?->format('Y-m-d'),
128|            'novoCpf' => $event->getNovoCpf(),
129|            'indRemun' => $event->getIndRemun(),
130|            'dtFimRemun' => $event->getDtFimRemun()?->format('Y-m-d'),
131|            'insConsig' => $event->getInsConsig(),
132|            'nrContr' => $event->getNrContr(),
133|        ];
134|        
135|        // Extrair dados da classe pai (EsocialEvents)
136|        $data['modo'] = $event->getModo();
137|        $data['tpAmb'] = $event->getTpAmb();
138|        $data['uniqueEventId'] = $event->getUniqueEventId();
139|        $data['tpInscTransmissor'] = $event->getTpInscTransmissor();
140|        $data['nrInscTransmissor'] = $event->getNrInscTransmissor();
141|        $data['iniValid'] = $event->getIniValid();
142|        $data['fimValid'] = $event->getFimValid();
143|        $data['indRetif'] = $event->getIndRetif();
144|        $data['indApuracao'] = $event->getIndApuracao();
145|        $data['perApur'] = $event->getPerApur()?->format('Y-m-d');
146|        $data['indGuia'] = $event->getIndGuia();
147|        $data['status'] = $event->getStatus();
148|        $data['createdAt'] = $event->getCreatedAt()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s');
149|        $data['updatedAt'] = $event->getUpdatedAt()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s');
150|        
151|        // Extrair dados da empresa
152|        $company = $event->getCompany();
153|        if ($company) {
154|            $data['company'] = [
155|                'id' => $company->getId(),
156|                'name' => $company->getName(),
157|                'code' => $company->getCode(),
158|                'cnpj' => $company->getCnpj(),
159|            ];
160|        } else {
161|            $data['company'] = null;
162|        }
163|        
164|        // Extrair dados do trabalhador eSocial relacionado
165|        $esocialTrabalhador = $event->getEsocialTrabalhador();
166|        if ($esocialTrabalhador) {
167|            $dadosTrabalhador = $esocialTrabalhador->getDadosTrabalhador();
168|            $endereco = $esocialTrabalhador->getEndereco();
169|            
170|            $data['esocialTrabalhador'] = [
171|                'id' => $esocialTrabalhador->getId(),
172|                'isTrabalhadorSemVinculo' => $esocialTrabalhador->getIsTrabalhadorSemVinculo(),
173|                'dadosTrabalhador' => $dadosTrabalhador ? [
174|                    'cpfTrab' => $dadosTrabalhador->getCpfTrab(),
175|                    'nmTrab' => $dadosTrabalhador->getNmTrab(),
176|                    'sexo' => $dadosTrabalhador->getSexo(),
177|                    'racaCor' => $dadosTrabalhador->getRacaCor(),
178|                    'estCiv' => $dadosTrabalhador->getEstCiv(),
179|                    'grauInstr' => $dadosTrabalhador->getGrauInstr(),
180|                    'nmSoc' => $dadosTrabalhador->getNmSoc(),
181|                    'dtNascto' => $dadosTrabalhador->getDtNascto()?->format('Y-m-d'),
182|                    'paisNascto' => $dadosTrabalhador->getPaisNascto(),
183|                    'paisNac' => $dadosTrabalhador->getPaisNac(),
184|                    'fonePrinc' => $dadosTrabalhador->getFonePrinc(),
185|                    'emailPrinc' => $dadosTrabalhador->getEmailPrinc(),
186|                    'dtAltDadosPessoais' => $dadosTrabalhador->getDtAltDadosPessoais()?->format('Y-m-d'),
187|                ] : null,
188|                'endereco' => $endereco ? [
189|                    'brasil' => $endereco->getBrasil() ? [
190|                        'tpLograd' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getTpLograd(),
191|                        'dscLograd' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getDscLograd(),
192|                        'nrLograd' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getNrLograd(),
193|                        'complemento' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getComplemento(),
194|                        'bairro' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getBairro(),
195|                        'cep' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getCep(),
196|                        'codMunic' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getCodMunic(),
197|                        'uf' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getUf(),
198|                    ] : null,
199|                    'exterior' => $endereco->getExterior() ? [
200|                        'paisResid' => $endereco->getExterior()->getPaisResid(),
201|                        'dscLograd' => $endereco->getExterior()->getDscLograd(),
202|                        'nrLograd' => $endereco->getExterior()->getNrLograd(),
203|                        'complemento' => $endereco->getExterior()->getComplemento(),
204|                        'bairro' => $endereco->getExterior()->getBairro(),
205|                        'nmCid' => $endereco->getExterior()->getNmCid(),
206|                        'codPostal' => $endereco->getExterior()->getCodPostal(),
207|                    ] : null,
208|                ] : null,
209|            ];
210|        } else {
211|            $data['esocialTrabalhador'] = null;
212|        }
213|        
214|        // Extrair dados de remuneração (EsocialDadosRemuneracao)
215|        $dadosRemuneracao = $event->getDadosRemuneracao();
216|        if ($dadosRemuneracao) {
217|            $data['dadosRemuneracao'] = [
218|                'id' => $dadosRemuneracao->getId(),
219|                'indMv' => $dadosRemuneracao->getIndMv(),
220|                'tpInscRemunOutrEmpr' => $dadosRemuneracao->getTpInscRemunOutrEmpr(),
221|                'nmTrab' => $dadosRemuneracao->getNmTrab(),
222|                'dtNascto' => $dadosRemuneracao->getDtNascto()?->format('Y-m-d'),
223|                'tpInscSucessaoVinc' => $dadosRemuneracao->getTpInscSucessaoVinc(),
224|                'nrInscSucessaoVinc' => $dadosRemuneracao->getNrInscSucessaoVinc(),
225|                'matricAnt' => $dadosRemuneracao->getMatricAnt(),
226|                'dtAdm' => $dadosRemuneracao->getDtAdm()?->format('Y-m-d'),
227|                'procJudTrab' => $dadosRemuneracao->getProcJudTrab(),
228|                'infoTerm' => $dadosRemuneracao->getInfoTerm(),
229|            ];
230|        } else {
231|            $data['dadosRemuneracao'] = null;
232|        }
233|        
234|        // Extrair dados do batch se existir
235|        $batch = $event->getBatch();
236|        if ($batch) {
237|            $data['batch'] = [
238|                'id' => $batch->getId(),
239|                'cdResposta' => $batch->getCdResposta(),
240|                'descResposta' => $batch->getDescResposta(),
241|                'protocoloEnvio' => $batch->getProtocoloEnvio(),
242|                'dhRecepcao' => $batch->getDhRecepcao()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s'),
243|            ];
244|        } else {
245|            $data['batch'] = null;
246|        }
247|        
248|        // Extrair dados da resposta se existir
249|        $response = $event->getResponse();
250|        if ($response) {
251|            $data['response'] = [
252|                'id' => $response->getId(),
253|                'tpAmb' => $response->getTpAmb(),
254|                'cdResposta' => $response->getCdResposta(),
255|                'descResposta' => $response->getDescResposta(),
256|                'nrRecibo' => $response->getNrRecibo(),
257|                'dhProcessamento' => $response->getDhProcessamento()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s'),
258|                'ocorrencias' => $response->getOcorrencias(),
259|            ];
260|        } else {
261|            $data['response'] = null;
262|        }
263|        
264|        return $data;
265|    }
266|
267|    // /**
268|    //  * @return EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[] Returns an array of EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento objects
269|    //  */
270|    /*
271|    public function findByExampleField($value)
272|    {
273|        return $this->createQueryBuilder('e')
274|            ->andWhere('e.exampleField = :val')
275|            ->setParameter('val', $value)
276|            ->orderBy('e.id', 'ASC')
277|            ->setMaxResults(10)
278|            ->getQuery()
279|            ->getResult()
280|        ;
281|    }
282|    */
283|
284|    /*
285|    public function findOneBySomeField($value): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
286|    {
287|        return $this->createQueryBuilder('e')
288|            ->andWhere('e.exampleField = :val')
289|            ->setParameter('val', $value)
290|            ->getQuery()
291|            ->getOneOrNullResult()
292|        ;
293|    }
294|    */
295|}
296|
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "docs/database-changes/2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template.md"}
File: docs/database-changes/2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template.md (Total lines: 72)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-72
1|# Mudanca De Banco - Flow Padrao Offboarding eSocial S-2299
2|
3|## Objetivo
4|
5|Criar, em workflows de saida existentes, um flow padrao de offboarding com etapas iniciais customizaveis e automacao para preparar o rascunho do evento eSocial S-2299 na etapa final.
6|
7|## Escopo
8|
9|- Usa apenas o produto `offboarding` quando ele ja esta ativo no catalogo.
10|- Semeia apenas empresas que ja possuem o workflow `Fluxos de Saida` com slug `fluxo-de-saida`.
11|- Vincula o produto `offboarding` ao workflow.
12|- Cria o template `Offboarding com eSocial (S-2299)` apenas quando ainda nao existir para a seed da migration.
13|- Vincula o produto ao template com `template_type = 'fixo'`.
14|- Cria as etapas, atividades e automacoes padrao do fluxo.
15|- Inclui a automacao `create_esocial_s2299_draft` na etapa final.
16|
17|## Migration Ou Script
18|
19|```text
20|Arquivo: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
21|Version: Version20260901171000
22|Tipo: migration de dados
23|Ambiente alvo: desenvolvimento, homologacao e producao
24|```
25|
26|## Plano De Execucao
27|
28|1. Publicar o codigo com a action `create_esocial_s2299_draft` disponivel em `config/automations/offboarding.yaml`.
29|2. Aplicar a migration uma unica vez por ambiente.
30|3. Conferir o workflow `Fluxos de Saida` no orquestrador de operacoes.
31|4. Criar uma instancia a partir do template e validar a automacao ao mover um membro para a etapa final.
32|
33|## Validacao
34|
35|Depois da migration:
36|
37|```sql
38|SELECT id, name, slug, is_default
39|FROM workflows
40|WHERE slug = 'fluxo-de-saida';
41|
42|SELECT id, name, template_category, settings
43|FROM flow_templates
44|WHERE name = 'Offboarding com eSocial (S-2299)';
45|
46|SELECT fa.name, fa.trigger_type, fa.action_type
47|FROM flow_automations fa
48|INNER JOIN flow_stages fs ON fs.id = fa.flow_stage_id
49|INNER JOIN flow_templates ft ON ft.id = fs.flow_template_id
50|WHERE ft.name = 'Offboarding com eSocial (S-2299)'
51|  AND fa.action_type = 'create_esocial_s2299_draft';
52|```
53|
54|Esperado: template criado nos workflows de saida existentes, com etapas padrao e automacao S-2299 na etapa final.
55|
56|## Rollback Ou Mitigacao
57|
58|O `DOWN` nao remove fisicamente os templates marcados com `settings.seed_migration = 20260901171000_offboarding_esocial_s2299_flow_template`. Ele desativa o template, remove o marcador `seed_migration` e grava `seed_migration_rolled_back`, preservando etapas, atividades, automacoes e vinculos do template para nao apagar instancias/processos em andamento por cascata.
59|
60|Quando a propria migration criou o vinculo `workflow_products`, o `DOWN` remove esse vinculo apenas se nao houver outro template ativo no workflow usando o produto `offboarding`.
61|
62|## Riscos
63|
64|- A migration popula dados nos workflows de saida existentes.
65|- Ambientes com tabelas de workflow ausentes pulam a execucao sem erro.
66|- O fluxo depende da action `create_esocial_s2299_draft` estar disponivel no codigo antes da migration ser usada operacionalmente.
67|- Templates ja customizados pelos usuarios nao sao alterados; somente a seed identificada pela migration e criada/desativada.
68|
69|## Responsavel
70|
71|Time de engenharia.
72|
Request #3 deepseek-v4-flash P:33.74K C:3.02K CR:28.29K CW:0 23422ms
Reasoning
The docs exist. The doc explains the intent: seed only into workflows with slug 'fluxo-de-saida' — for all companies with that workflow. The doc says "Semeia apenas empresas que ja possuem o workflow Fluxos de Saida com slug fluxo-de-saida". So it is intended to seed every company with the workflow. Still, whether the company has offboarding product eligibility is a question. The doc says "Usa apenas o produto offboarding quando ele ja esta ativo no catalogo" — that's about global products.active flag, not per-company entitlement. So a tenancy concern may exist, but the migration's documentation explicitly describes this behavior as intended and documented. This was a "high" plan issue, but given the doc covers it explicitly, the actual risk is limited. However, we should check if offboarding has per-company entitlements elsewhere (e.g., product link per company). Let me investigate how product/offboarding availability is decided at runtime. Let me check config for offboarding and how products relate to companies. Let me look at the offboarding.yaml config file to see other actions and the allowed_triggers and whether new action is in scope. Also let me check where EsocialDadosTrabalhador is retrieved, and how the canonical S-2299 event creation occurs elsewhere — find source: repository is used, plus the EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php entity file diff (+4/-4) in other changed files. Let me read the entity changes (other_changed_files include src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php (+4/-4), and a template motivo_desligamento.html.twig, and a test change). Those aren't in review group, but we can read them for context. Let me now read key areas of the AutomationExecutionService diff in detail. Particularly: 1. `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` flow. Issue: `$eventStatus === 'updated'` branch only when the event already existed and status == pendente. Otherwise if event is created (not existing in DB), then applyEsocialS2299Payload with $onlyEmptyFields=false. Fine. Potential real bug: In the update branch, they call `$event->setUpdatedAt(...)` then `$eventStatus = 'updated'`. For a created event, they don't set updatedAt. Not a bug necessarily. Potential bug in `findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal`: query uses `event.dtDeslig = :dismissalDate` with `$dismissalDate->format('Y-m-d')`. This may be fine depending on field mapping; dtDeslig presumably a `date` column. Actually wait: if there's an existing official event with status != pendente for that dismissal date, they treat as existing_not_editable, then metadata stores eventId and eventStatus = existing_not_editable. Then later they notify that an official event exists. OK. Potential bug: When esocialTrabalhador or remuneracao missing (draft_only), they store metadata with eventId null and missing arrays, and send a "Dados eSocial pendentes..." notification. But no event record; fine. Potential bug: The `responsible` resolve uses `$config['to']` which defaults 'flow_responsible', but config preset 'to' => 'flow_responsible' — however executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft resolves responsible from responsible_id or flow responsible or offboarding responsible. It never uses `config['to']` = 'flow_responsible' directly. Then notification sent via executeNotify with `'to' => 'company_member'`, `company_member_id`. OK. Potential bug about company isolation: The notification sent by executeNotify with to company_member and responsible id. Also the event created belongs to company of flow instance. The review plan item 1 in the service file concerns isolation by company. `resolveEsocialS2299Responsible` checks that configured responsible belongs to the same company. OK. Now for the `member->getSourceMetadata()` update: after flush, they re-read metadata to update eventId. That's fine. Potential issue: `$metadata['esocialS2299Draft']['eventId'] = $event->getId();` — event id null if event is null? They only do that if event instanceof. OK. Potential concern: `findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding` checks metadata eventId and offboardingMemberId. If the event previously existed as 'pendente' but was created with different company? They check via esocialS2299EventMatchesContext. Now, an actual potential bug: In `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, when `$eventStatus === 'updated'`, they call `$event->setUpdatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());` then `applyEsocialS2299Payload($event, $payload, $eventStatus === 'updated')` with onlyEmptyFields=true, meaning payload only fills empty fields for the updated event. That means if the user edits the offboarding data (e.g., changes dismissal date or motivo) after event created, the update won't change values on the draft — only fill empty fields. Wait: on 'updated' status, onlyEmptyFields=true means new payload values do NOT overwrite existing non-empty values. That seems backwards: when re-running the automation to "update" a draft, we'd want to update fields with new values. But the design may be to preserve human edits to the draft. Hmm. But wait, on the first run, eventStatus = 'created', onlyEmptyFields = false, so all payload fields get set. On re-runs (same member re-entering the stage or automation triggered again), event found via metadata with status pendente -> 'updated', and only empty fields get filled. But since first run filled all non-empty payload fields, there'd be no empties unless the payload had new values later. Since payload fields mostly are '' when not provided... Actually the payload is built from config values which will be '' for fields not configured; those get applied as null (only non-null applied). So if first run had dataDesligamento = '2026-09-01', later the offboarding dismissal date changes to 2026-09-15 — on the 'updated' run, dtDeslig already non-null, so it stays 2026-09-01. That's stale data. But maybe intentional because an official pendente draft is considered user-owned. Hmm, this is a judgment call. But actually the automation says "Cria ou atualiza o rascunho do evento S-2299 com dados do offboarding". If it's meant to update on each entry to final stage, then it should refresh values from the offboarding. Using onlyEmptyFields=true for updates contradicts "atualiza o rascunho ... com dados do offboarding" — as dismissal date changes could be left stale. This is worth a low/medium comment perhaps. But it may be intentional to preserve human edits. Given the message in the notification says "foi atualizado a partir do offboarding", users expect updated data. I'll consider a medium finding regarding semantics: the update path only fills empty fields, so if the offboarding dismissal date/motivo changes after the draft is created, the draft keeps the old values while the notification claims it was "atualizado". Worth flagging as medium/low. Let me continue reading around executeNotify and the system_sender change, and also check context/company isolation elsewhere. Actually let me focus on the biggest issues. Review plan already gave 6 issues. My job: verify and confirm with code. Then provide code_comment entries only for real issues (newly added lines). Let me thoroughly verify each. Let me look at how `products.active`/company product availability works, to confirm the tenancy concern. Let me search for product->slug offboarding usage & company product link e.g., CompanyProduct, service packages. Search for 'offboarding' in src. Let me check the config/automations/offboarding.yaml file context (allowed_triggers etc.) and see if new action is at least under offboarding scope. Let me read the migration file fully - it's 440 lines new, shown in diff. Let me read file to get exact context/line numbers for comments. Let me read the yaml to check key spelling. Now, let me carefully check migration details: - In `up()`, `ensureWorkflowProduct($workflowId, $offboardingProductId, 0)` updates order_index to 0 for the product if it exists. That's an update to existing rows; maybe fine. - Wait, there's a subtle bug: `ensureWorkflowProduct` will insert a new workflow_products row if it doesn't exist. Then `ensureTemplate` creates flow_templates. Then `ensureTemplateProduct`, etc. But in `up()`, the `workflowProductExisted` variable is used to compute rollback state. Note if the workflow_products insert happens and then template fails or skipped... covered by issue 4. - Another subtle bug: In `up()`, table existence check loop: `foreach (['company', ...] ...)` — wait the list includes 'company'? Let me look again: `['company', 'products', 'workflows', 'workflow_products', 'flow_templates', ...]`. Wait the table is 'company'? Hmm, that's odd — the actual table might be `company` (singular). Some systems use `company`. Let me not worry. Wait, actually let me re-check the diff: `foreach (['company', 'products', 'workflows', ...]`. So table names include 'company' not 'companies'. Might be right for this schema. - The migration inserts into `flow_automations` with `flow_template_id` NULL and `fixed_stage_type` NULL. It seeds automations only if not exists (by name+trigger+action). Idempotency on re-run: if run again, `ensureStage` finds by lower(name), ensureActivity, ensureAutomation returns if exists. `ensureTemplate` finds by seed_migration setting. So re-run is mostly idempotent, except `ensureTemplateProduct` updates and `ensureWorkflowProduct` updates order_index; fine. - A real problem: in `down()`, rollback uses `DELETE wp FROM workflow_products wp WHERE ... AND NOT EXISTS (... active templates using the product on the same workflow ...)`. If another template is inactive (is_active=0) but references the workflow_product, we delete it. Also instances in progress may reference the workflow_products row... but workflow_products may not have FK from instance members. Hard to confirm. Potential bug in down(): In the DELETE subquery they compare `active_ft.workflow_id = wp.workflow_id` and `active_ftp.product_id = wp.product_id`. fine. But wait — the down() flow: for each template row found (by seed_migration in settings), it deletes the workflow_product only if workflow_product_was_created true, then deactivates the template and records seed_migration_rolled_back. But if down() is executed twice (rollback re-run?), the second time no rows with seed_migration (already rolled back marker) will match, so no-op. OK. - Concern: In `up()` each workflow gets its own template even if another company already created the same-named template? `ensureTemplate` keys by workflow_id + seed marker, and inserts name = TEMPLATE_NAME. Fine. Now potential migration bug about the product active: `findActiveProductId('offboarding')` requires products.active = 1. If the product is inactive, returns 0 and up() returns without seeding. Doc says that. But this means up() runs silently and marks applied. And it's non-transactional — but seed failure partial is the concern. Fine. Now, cross-tenant: The migration seeds for every company with workflow slug 'fluxo-de-saida'. It will create workflow_products row linking offboarding product. Even if a company never uses offboarding. The doc mentions this risk? Doc says "A migration popula dados nos workflows de saida existentes." It does mention risk but no per-company entitlement criterion. Is there any per-company product/entitlement model in this codebase? Let me search. Let me now examine AutomationExecutionService around line 7039 - the system_sender addition to emailConfig. And the block around 13903-13926. I need to check whether `$config['system_sender']` boolean is properly handled and safe (filter_var FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN handles 'true' string). If system_sender true, assistant conversation used; notification appears from Adriana. This is intended change to send as system. Is it applied only for new action? No, it generalizes prior payroll-specific logic to any action that sets system_sender=true. Fine. Let me verify there is a route `my_company_member_manage`. Search. Let me also check the entity for EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento to see constraints on fields set (e.g., mtvDeslig column length, pensAlim etc. changed types). The other changed file EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php (+4/-4). Let me read the entity file and its diff.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read_diff
Show Details
{"path_array": ["src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php", "templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig", "tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php"]}
==== FILE: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php ====
diff --git a/src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php b/src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
--- a/src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
+++ b/src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
@@ -201,24 +201,24 @@ class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento extends EsocialEvents
         return $this;
     }
 
-    public function getPercAliment(): ?int
+    public function getPercAliment(): ?string
     {
         return $this->percAliment;
     }
 
-    public function setPercAliment(?int $percAliment): self
+    public function setPercAliment(?string $percAliment): self
     {
         $this->percAliment = $percAliment;
 
         return $this;
     }
 
-    public function getVrAlim(): ?int
+    public function getVrAlim(): ?string
     {
         return $this->vrAlim;
     }
 
-    public function setVrAlim(?int $vrAlim): self
+    public function setVrAlim(?string $vrAlim): self
     {
         $this->vrAlim = $vrAlim;
 
==== FILE: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig ====
diff --git a/templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig b/templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig
--- a/templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig
+++ b/templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
                         class="form-control" 
                         maxlength="20" 
                         placeholder="Informe o número do processo trabalhista"
-                        value="{% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab %}{{ prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab }}{% endif %}">
+                        value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab %}{{ prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab }}{% endif %}">
                     <small class="form-text text-muted">
                         Número que identifica o processo trabalhista (opcional).
                     </small>
==== FILE: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php ====
diff --git a/tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php b/tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php
--- a/tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php
+++ b/tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ final class SsmaEventValidatorTest extends SsmaTestCase
         );
     }
 
-    public function testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoMedicoExigeCaracterizar(): void
+    public function testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoMedicoComSuspeitaExigeCaracterizar(): void
     {
         $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
 
@@ -875,6 +875,7 @@ final class SsmaEventValidatorTest extends SsmaTestCase
                 'injury_type'           => 'CORTE',
                 'injury_severity'       => 'LEVE',
                 'injury_classification' => 'FAC',
+                'descaracter_suspect'   => '1',
                 'body_parts'            => [
                     ['region' => 'MAO', 'side' => 'DIREITA', 'injury_type' => 'CORTE'],
                 ],

code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "fluxo-de-saida|WORKFLOW_SLUG|'offboarding'", "file_patterns": ["src/", "config/"]}
No matches found
Request #4 deepseek-v4-flash P:37.71K C:258 CR:36.74K CW:0 3494ms
Reasoning
Interesting — the search for `'offboarding'` with that pattern returned no matches; maybe because file patterns syntax for src/ and config/ is wrong, or no matches due to escaping. Let me search differently. Let me search for how offboarding products / entitlements are handled per company. Let me search "offboarding" in config/automations and in src for product activation checks, company product. Search "getSourceType() !== 'offboarding'" - that's the runtime check for the action; but action is only triggered in offboarding flow context. Let me check entity EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento full to understand required fields (e.g., what is required - dtDeslig, mtvDeslig) and existing constraints. Let me read that entity file.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php"}
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php (Total lines: 335)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-335
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Entity;
4|
5|use App\Repository\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository;
6|use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
7|
8|/**
9| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass=EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::class)
10| */
11|class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento extends EsocialEvents
12|{
13|    /**
14|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="EsocialDadosTrabalhador")
15|     * @ORM\JoinColumn(name="esocial_dados_trabalhador_id", referencedColumnName="id", nullable=false)
16|     */
17|    private $esocialTrabalhador;
18|
19|    /**
20|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=2, nullable=true)
21|     */
22|    private $mtvDeslig;
23|
24|    /**
25|     * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
26|     */
27|    private $dtDeslig;
28|
29|    /**
30|     * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
31|     */
32|    private $dtAvPrv;
33|
34|    /**
35|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=1, nullable=true)
36|     */
37|    private $indPagtoApi;
38|
39|    /**
40|     * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
41|     */
42|    private $dtProjFimApi;
43|
44|    /**
45|     * @ORM\Column(type="integer", nullable=true)
46|     */
47|    private $pensAlim;
48|
49|    /**
50|     * @ORM\Column(type="decimal", precision=10, scale=2, nullable=true)
51|     */
52|    private $percAliment;
53|
54|    /**
55|     * @ORM\Column(type="decimal", precision=10, scale=2, nullable=true)
56|     */
57|    private $vrAlim;
58|
59|    /**
60|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=20, nullable=true)
61|     */
62|    private $nrProcTrab;
63|
64|    /**
65|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=1, nullable=true)
66|     */
67|    private $indPdv;
68|
69|    /**
70|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=11, nullable=true)
71|     */
72|    private $cpfSubstituto;
73|
74|    /**
75|     * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
76|     */
77|    private $dtNascto;
78|
79|    /**
80|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=11, nullable=true)
81|     */
82|    private $novoCpf;
83|
84|    /**
85|     * @ORM\Column(type="integer", nullable=true)
86|     */
87|    private $indRemun;
88|
89|    /**
90|     * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
91|     */
92|    private $dtFimRemun;
93|
94|    /**
95|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=5, nullable=true)
96|     */
97|    private $insConsig;
98|
99|    /**
100|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=40, nullable=true)
101|     */
102|    private $nrContr;
103|
104|    /**
105|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity=EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class, )
106|     * @ORM\JoinColumn(nullable=false)
107|     */
108|    private $dadosRemuneracao;
109|
110|    public function getDadosRemuneracao(): ?EsocialDadosRemuneracao
111|    {
112|        return $this->dadosRemuneracao;
113|    }
114|
115|    public function setDadosRemuneracao(?EsocialDadosRemuneracao $dadosRemuneracao): self
116|    {
117|        $this->dadosRemuneracao = $dadosRemuneracao;
118|
119|        return $this;
120|    }
121|
122|    public function getEsocialTrabalhador()
123|    {
124|        return $this->esocialTrabalhador;
125|    }
126|
127|    public function setEsocialTrabalhador(?EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador): void
128|    {
129|        $this->esocialTrabalhador = $esocialTrabalhador;
130|    }
131|
132|    public function getMtvDeslig(): ?string
133|    {
134|        return $this->mtvDeslig;
135|    }
136|
137|    public function setMtvDeslig(?string $mtvDeslig): self
138|    {
139|        $this->mtvDeslig = $mtvDeslig;
140|
141|        return $this;
142|    }
143|
144|    public function getDtDeslig(): ?\DateTimeInterface
145|    {
146|        return $this->dtDeslig;
147|    }
148|
149|    public function setDtDeslig(?\DateTimeInterface $dtDeslig): self
150|    {
151|        $this->dtDeslig = $dtDeslig;
152|
153|        return $this;
154|    }
155|
156|    public function getDtAvPrv(): ?\DateTimeInterface
157|    {
158|        return $this->dtAvPrv;
159|    }
160|
161|    public function setDtAvPrv(?\DateTimeInterface $dtAvPrv): self
162|    {
163|        $this->dtAvPrv = $dtAvPrv;
164|
165|        return $this;
166|    }
167|
168|    public function getIndPagtoApi(): ?string
169|    {
170|        return $this->indPagtoApi;
171|    }
172|
173|    public function setIndPagtoApi(?string $indPagtoApi): self
174|    {
175|        $this->indPagtoApi = $indPagtoApi;
176|
177|        return $this;
178|    }
179|
180|    public function getDtProjFimApi(): ?\DateTimeInterface
181|    {
182|        return $this->dtProjFimApi;
183|    }
184|
185|    public function setDtProjFimApi(?\DateTimeInterface $dtProjFimApi): self
186|    {
187|        $this->dtProjFimApi = $dtProjFimApi;
188|
189|        return $this;
190|    }
191|
192|    public function getPensAlim(): ?int
193|    {
194|        return $this->pensAlim;
195|    }
196|
197|    public function setPensAlim(?int $pensAlim): self
198|    {
199|        $this->pensAlim = $pensAlim;
200|
201|        return $this;
202|    }
203|
204|    public function getPercAliment(): ?string
205|    {
206|        return $this->percAliment;
207|    }
208|
209|    public function setPercAliment(?string $percAliment): self
210|    {
211|        $this->percAliment = $percAliment;
212|
213|        return $this;
214|    }
215|
216|    public function getVrAlim(): ?string
217|    {
218|        return $this->vrAlim;
219|    }
220|
221|    public function setVrAlim(?string $vrAlim): self
222|    {
223|        $this->vrAlim = $vrAlim;
224|
225|        return $this;
226|    }
227|
228|    public function getNrProcTrab(): ?string
229|    {
230|        return $this->nrProcTrab;
231|    }
232|
233|    public function setNrProcTrab(?string $nrProcTrab): self
234|    {
235|        $this->nrProcTrab = $nrProcTrab;
236|
237|        return $this;
238|    }
239|
240|    public function getIndPdv(): ?string
241|    {
242|        return $this->indPdv;
243|    }
244|
245|    public function setIndPdv(?string $indPdv): self
246|    {
247|        $this->indPdv = $indPdv;
248|
249|        return $this;
250|    }
251|
252|    public function getCpfSubstituto(): ?string
253|    {
254|        return $this->cpfSubstituto;
255|    }
256|
257|    public function setCpfSubstituto(?string $cpfSubstituto): self
258|    {
259|        $this->cpfSubstituto = $cpfSubstituto;
260|
261|        return $this;
262|    }
263|
264|    public function getDtNascto(): ?\DateTimeInterface
265|    {
266|        return $this->dtNascto;
267|    }
268|
269|    public function setDtNascto(?\DateTimeInterface $dtNascto): self
270|    {
271|        $this->dtNascto = $dtNascto;
272|
273|        return $this;
274|    }
275|
276|    public function getNovoCpf(): ?string
277|    {
278|        return $this->novoCpf;
279|    }
280|
281|    public function setNovoCpf(?string $novoCpf): self
282|    {
283|        $this->novoCpf = $novoCpf;
284|
285|        return $this;
286|    }
287|
288|    public function getIndRemun(): ?int
289|    {
290|        return $this->indRemun;
291|    }
292|
293|    public function setIndRemun(?int $indRemun): self
294|    {
295|        $this->indRemun = $indRemun;
296|
297|        return $this;
298|    }
299|
300|    public function getDtFimRemun(): ?\DateTimeInterface
301|    {
302|        return $this->dtFimRemun;
303|    }
304|
305|    public function setDtFimRemun(?\DateTimeInterface $dtFimRemun): self
306|    {
307|        $this->dtFimRemun = $dtFimRemun;
308|
309|        return $this;
310|    }
311|
312|    public function getInsConsig(): ?string
313|    {
314|        return $this->insConsig;
315|    }
316|
317|    public function setInsConsig(?string $insConsig): self
318|    {
319|        $this->insConsig = $insConsig;
320|
321|        return $this;
322|    }
323|
324|    public function getNrContr(): ?string
325|    {
326|        return $this->nrContr;
327|    }
328|
329|    public function setNrContr(?string $nrContr): self
330|    {
331|        $this->nrContr = $nrContr;
332|
333|        return $this;
334|    }
335|}
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember"}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 6
14944|            $offboardingMember = $this->findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember($member);
15441|            $offboardingMember = $this->findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember($member);
15519|            $offboardingMember = $this->findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember($member);
15579|    private function findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember(FlowInstanceMember $member): ?\App\Entity\OffboardingMember
15590|                error_log("[AUTOMATION] findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember: Encontrado via activities_progress.offboardingMemberId = {$omId}");
15620|            error_log("[AUTOMATION] findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember: Encontrado via offboarding+companyMember (fallback), OM ID = {$offboardingMember->getId()}");

Request #5 deepseek-v4-flash P:40.86K C:739 CR:37.89K CW:0 7458ms
Reasoning
The entity has `mtvDeslig` column string length 2 — the canonical eSocial S-2299 mtvDeslig codes are 2-digit codes (e.g., "01"). So the new automation maps `$payload['motivoDesligamento']` directly as string into `setMtvDeslig` without converting a reason (like text from offboarding `$offboardingMember->getReason()`) to a 2-digit code. But the payload only sets it from `$config['motivoDesligamento'] ?? $config['mtvDeslig'] ?? ''`. The config comes from the automation's actionConfig preset in the flow, which is empty ([]). Actually in the seeded flow, actionConfig is `['to' => 'flow_responsible', '_default_automation_id' => ...]`, so motivoDesligamento is ''. So the event's mtvDeslig stays null unless the automation was configured with those config fields. Hmm. But wait — the config preset could be filled by the user in the automation form. So a user may type a free-text motivo that would be persisted into a `length=2` column and later fail when sending to eSocial, or be truncated (MySQL strict mode would error; if not strict, truncate to 2 chars). This is an issue: no validation of motivo code. However, is the automation UI even exposing those config fields? The action has `has_config: false` in yaml and `config_preset: { to: "flow_responsible" }`. So no config UI, meaning payload values all '' basically, and the actual event fields would remain null except dates from dismissal date. Then draft event with mostly null fields and mtvDeslig null would be created. Wait, actually if everything is null, that's just an empty draft event. But dtDeslig would be set from offboarding dismissal date, which could be a valid date. Reason not mapped. Hmm. Also `$offboardingMember->getReason()` is only put into `_offboarding` metadata, not mapped to `mtvDeslig`. So the draft's motivo isn't pre-filled even though offboarding has a dismissal reason, which presumably maps to a legal motivo code. Let me check OffboardingMember reason semantics — maybe reasons are codes (e.g., "01"). Let's check. Let me read `OffboardingMember` entity for getReason and getDismissalDate. And check the motivoDesligamento mapping elsewhere — e.g., in the member_guides template motivo desligamento, they may use a select with eSocial codes. Let me search templates for motivo mapping used when creating S2299 manually. Actually, note the repository saveEventS2299 receives `$data['motivoDesligamento']` — from a form that presumably selects from a closed list. So motivo is likely expected to be a code. Let me read OffboardingMember entity and the esocial desligamento templates/controller to understand data flow and validation. Let me look at where EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento saveEventS2299 is invoked to see the validation path.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "saveEventS2299"}
File: config/routes.yaml
Match lines: 1
1526|  controller: App\Controller\CompanyMemberController::saveEventS2299

File: src/Controller/CompanyMemberController.php
Match lines: 2
527|    public function saveEventS2299(Request $request): Response
548|            $event = $em->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)->saveEventS2299($esocialTrabalhador, $data, $company, $remuneracao);

File: src/EventSubscriber/AdminPermissionSubscriber.php
Match lines: 1
276|            'saveEventS2299' => [

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
63|    public function saveEventS2299($esocialDadosTrabalhador, $data, $company, $dadosRemuneracao): EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento

file_find
Show Details
{"query_name": "OffboardingMember.php"}
src/Entity/OffboardingMember.php
Request #6 deepseek-v4-flash P:41.85K C:115 CR:41.6K CW:0 2238ms
Reasoning
Let me look at CompanyMemberController::saveEventS2299 (lines around 527) to understand validation and data flow for official events.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/CompanyMemberController.php", "start_line": 490, "end_line": 600}
File: src/Controller/CompanyMemberController.php (Total lines: 4410)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 490-600
490|
491|        return new Response('Event S2205 saved');
492|    }
493|
494|    public function saveEventS2206(Request $request): Response
495|    {
496|        $em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
497|        $company = $this->security->getUser()->getCompany();
498|
499|        $data = json_decode($request->getContent(), true);
500|
501|        if ($data['member'] == null) {
502|            $this->logger->error('Company Member ID is null');
503|        }
504|
505|        $companyMember = $this->getDoctrine()->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find($data['member']);
506|
507|    //        if ($this->checkS2200Status($companyMember)) {
508|    //            $this->logger->error('Evento S2200 ainda não processado');
509|    //            return new Response('Event S2200 not processed');
510|    //        }
511|
512|        try {
513|            $esocialTrabalhador = $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosTrabalhador::class)->saveEsocialTrabalhador($data, $company, $companyMember);
514|            $event = $em->getRepository(EsocialS2206EvtAltContratual::class)->saveEventS2206($esocialTrabalhador, $company, $companyMember);
515|            $afterSaveResponse = $this->handleEventAfterSave($event, $data, 'S2206');
516|            if ($afterSaveResponse !== null) {
517|                return $afterSaveResponse;
518|            }
519|        } catch (\Exception $e) {
520|            $this->logger->error('Error saving event S2206: ' . $e->getMessage());
521|            throw $e;
522|        }
523|
524|        return new Response('Event S2206 saved');
525|    }
526|
527|    public function saveEventS2299(Request $request): Response
528|    {
529|        $em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
530|        $company = $this->security->getUser()->getCompany();
531|
532|        $data = json_decode($request->getContent(), true);
533|
534|        if ($data['member'] == null) {
535|            $this->logger->error('Company Member ID is null');
536|        }
537|
538|        $companyMember = $this->getDoctrine()->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find($data['member']);
539|
540|    //        if ($this->checkS2200Status($companyMember)) {
541|    //            $this->logger->error('Evento S2200 ainda não processado');
542|    //            return new Response('Event S2200 not processed');
543|    //        }
544|
545|        try {
546|            $esocialTrabalhador = $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosTrabalhador::class)->findOneBy(['companyMember' => $companyMember]);
547|            $remuneracao = $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class)->findByTrabalhador($esocialTrabalhador);
548|            $event = $em->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)->saveEventS2299($esocialTrabalhador, $data, $company, $remuneracao);
549|            $afterSaveResponse = $this->handleEventAfterSave($event, $data, 'S2299');
550|            if ($afterSaveResponse !== null) {
551|                return $afterSaveResponse;
552|            }
553|        } catch (\Exception $e) {
554|            $this->logger->error('Error saving event S2299: ' . $e->getMessage());
555|            throw $e;
556|        }
557|
558|        return new Response('Event S2299 saved');
559|
560|    }
561|
562|    public function saveEventS2230(Request $request): Response
563|    {
564|        $em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
565|        $company = $this->security->getUser()->getCompany();
566|
567|        $data = json_decode($request->getContent(), true);
568|
569|        if ($data['member'] == null) {
570|            $this->logger->error('Company Member ID is null');
571|        }
572|
573|        $companyMember = $this->getDoctrine()->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find($data['member']);
574|
575|    //        if ($this->checkS2200Status($companyMember)) {
576|    //            $this->logger->error('Evento S2200 ainda não processado');
577|    //            return new Response('Event S2200 not processed');
578|    //        }
579|
580|        try {
581|            $esocialTrabalhador = $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosTrabalhador::class)->findOneBy(['companyMember' => $companyMember]);
582|            $event = $em->getRepository(EsocialS2230EvtAfastTemp::class)->saveEventS2230($data, $company, $esocialTrabalhador);
583|            $afterSaveResponse = $this->handleEventAfterSave($event, $data, 'S2230');
584|            if ($afterSaveResponse !== null) {
585|                return $afterSaveResponse;
586|            }
587|        } catch (\Exception $e) {
588|            $this->logger->error('Error saving event S2230: ' . $e->getMessage());
589|            throw $e;
590|        }
591|
592|        return new Response('Event S2230 saved');
593|    }
594|
595|    public function saveEventS2399(Request $request): Response
596|    {
597|        $em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
598|        $company = $this->security->getUser()->getCompany();
599|
600|        $data = json_decode($request->getContent(), true);
Request #7 deepseek-v4-flash P:43.4K C:1.24K CR:41.86K CW:0 10954ms
Reasoning
The official flow in the controller is similar in minimal validation. Both are thin. So the "missing validation" point is less severe — the canonical save path also doesn't validate closed lists in repository. The UI likely constrains input. So a review comment about validation could be considered but only if config values could be user-controlled and map to closed lists incorrectly. Since `has_config: false` in the yaml for this new action, the automation config can't be edited through the automation UI config panel? Wait — but the seeded template's automation `actionConfig` includes `'to' => 'flow_responsible'` plus `_default_automation_id`. Actually, the action might still support config in automation. Regardless, mostly the motivo remains empty. More important: the event creation should map the offboarding's dismissal reason (offboardingMember->getReason()) to the eSocial motivo code (mtvDeslig), otherwise the "pré-preenchido" draft will be missing the main required field of S-2299 (motivo do desligamento is required in S-2299). Actually mtvDeslig is a required field in eSocial S-2299 for the dismissal record. But for a draft to review, they might leave it to the responsible person. But then the automation's purpose of prefilling would only prefill dates and not the motivo even though offboarding stores a reason. Let me check OffboardingMember.getReason to see what it looks like (text or code). Let me read the OffboardingMember entity and the offboarding dismissal reason in templates/guides that show reasons. Also, note: In `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, when `$eventStatus` is 'updated', they call `$event->setUpdatedAt` then apply payload with onlyEmptyFields=true. As discussed, fields with existing values won't be refreshed. For a draft that is expected to follow the offboarding record (e.g., if dismissal date changes), stale data is a real behavior. But is it a "bug"? Could be argued intentional to protect data already revised by the responsible user. But at the moment the draft is created automatically in the same run, first time it's created (eventStatus created) with onlyEmptyFields=false, so it's complete; if the member re-enters the stage (trigger on_enter fires again? maybe not), or the offboarding changes, only empties get filled. There's a risk of stale data, but the design might be to avoid overwriting. I might flag low/medium. Let me verify the biggest issues: 1. `member->getSourceMetadata()` gets updated with metadata including `'eventId' => $event?->getId()`. Right after first flush; if `$event` is newly created but not flushed, id may be null at first flush; that's why the second block re-reads and flushes again to persist the id. But between first flush and second flush, the entity has id. In the second block they use `$member->getSourceMetadata()` after first flush; note the metadata array was stored in the member object's sourceMetadata property. After flush, Doctrine doesn't refresh the property; metadata still has null eventId. They re-read `$member->getSourceMetadata()` from the entity's in-memory value (still null eventId). Then set the eventId and flush. That works. 2. Actually, wait - there might be a subtle issue: The first `$this->entityManager->persist($member)` and `flush()` will also persist the newly created `$event` object because it was persisted earlier via `persist($event)`. Actually `$event` persist only happens when `$eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable'`. In that branch (event created) it persists. Good. But hold on — the code in the `else` branch of `if (!$esocialTrabalhador ...)` only creates the event if `$remuneracao instanceof EsocialDadosRemuneracao`. And `findByTrabalhador` — the canonical controller passes `$remuneracao` which could be null; the repository maps it to a non-nullable join column. In the automation, if no remuneracao, missing=[] so no event created, and metadata just records missing and sends notification. OK. 3. Then second flush on event id: If event existed as pendente and updated (not newly created), the id already existed at the first flush, so second flush updates metadata with eventId correctly. Now concurrency: two automations running concurrently for same offboarding could create two events. findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding relies on metadata stored at time of first run (eventId recorded). But there's a window between create and recording? Both writes happen in the same request sequentially, so concurrent runs can each find no existing event (metadata empty) and create two events... The whole automation is triggered on entering the stage. Would it trigger twice? Possibly not concurrently. Not a big issue; but their "idempotente" claim has a race. Eh, skip. Let me now read the relevant sections of AutomationExecutionService around lines 14924-15420 fully to confirm exact line numbers and details, including findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember, and to look at the `executeNotify` signature. Also confirm `getOffboardingFlowResponsible` method exists on Offboarding entity (used in resolveEsocialS2299Responsible). Let me search.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 14920, "end_line": 15430}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15626)
IS_TRUNCATED: true
LINE_RANGE: 14920-15419
14920|        if ($member->getSourceType() !== 'offboarding') {
14921|            return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Esta ação só pode ser usada em contexto de offboarding'];
14922|        }
14923|
14924|        return $this->offboardingToRecruitment->createFromOffboarding($member, $config, $context);
14925|    }
14926|
14927|    private function executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
14928|    {
14929|        if (!$member instanceof FlowInstanceMember) {
14930|            return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Membro não encontrado'];
14931|        }
14932|
14933|        if ($member->getSourceType() !== 'offboarding') {
14934|            return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Esta ação só pode ser usada em contexto de offboarding'];
14935|        }
14936|
14937|        $flowInstance = $member->getFlowInstance();
14938|        $company = $flowInstance?->getCompany();
14939|        if (!$company instanceof Company || $company->getEsocialMode() === null) {
14940|            return ['executed' => false, 'skipped' => true, 'reason' => 'esocial_disabled'];
14941|        }
14942|
14943|        try {
14944|            $offboardingMember = $this->findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember($member);
14945|            if (!$offboardingMember) {
14946|                return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'OffboardingMember não encontrado'];
14947|            }
14948|
14949|            $companyMember = $offboardingMember->getCompanyMember();
14950|            if (!$companyMember instanceof CompanyMembers) {
14951|                return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Colaborador do offboarding não encontrado'];
14952|            }
14953|
14954|            $responsible = $this->resolveEsocialS2299Responsible($config, $member, $offboardingMember);
14955|            if (!$responsible instanceof CompanyMembers) {
14956|                $this->log('warning', 'Responsável do S-2299 não resolvido para automação de offboarding', [
14957|                    'flowInstanceMemberId' => $member->getId(),
14958|                    'offboardingMemberId' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
14959|                ]);
14960|
14961|                return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Responsável pelo preenchimento do S-2299 não encontrado'];
14962|            }
14963|
14964|            $esocialTrabalhador = $this->entityManager
14965|                ->getRepository(EsocialDadosTrabalhador::class)
14966|                ->findOneBy(['companyMember' => $companyMember]);
14967|
14968|            $payload = $this->buildEsocialS2299DraftPayload($offboardingMember, $companyMember, $responsible, $config);
14969|            $event = null;
14970|            $eventStatus = 'draft_only';
14971|            $missing = [];
14972|
14973|            if (!$esocialTrabalhador instanceof EsocialDadosTrabalhador) {
14974|                $missing[] = 'esocial_worker_data';
14975|            } else {
14976|                $remuneracao = $this->entityManager
14977|                    ->getRepository(EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class)
14978|                    ->findByTrabalhador($esocialTrabalhador);
14979|
14980|                if (!$remuneracao instanceof EsocialDadosRemuneracao) {
14981|                    $missing[] = 'esocial_remuneration_data';
14982|                } else {
14983|                    $event = $this->findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding($member, $offboardingMember, $company, $esocialTrabalhador, $remuneracao);
14984|                    if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $event->getStatus() !== 'pendente') {
14985|                        $eventStatus = 'existing_not_editable';
14986|                    } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
14987|                        $event->setUpdatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
14988|                        $eventStatus = 'updated';
14989|                    } else {
14990|                        $event = $this->findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal($company, $esocialTrabalhador, $remuneracao, $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate());
14991|                        if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
14992|                            $eventStatus = 'existing_not_editable';
14993|                        } else {
14994|                            $event = $this->createEsocialS2299DraftEvent($company, $esocialTrabalhador);
14995|                            $eventStatus = 'created';
14996|                        }
14997|                    }
14998|
14999|                    if ($eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable') {
15000|                        $event->setDadosRemuneracao($remuneracao);
15001|                        $this->applyEsocialS2299Payload($event, $payload, $eventStatus === 'updated');
15002|                        $this->entityManager->persist($event);
15003|                    }
15004|                }
15005|            }
15006|
15007|            $reviewUrl = $this->buildEsocialS2299ReviewUrl($companyMember);
15008|            $metadata = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? [];
15009|            if (!is_array($metadata)) {
15010|                $metadata = [];
15011|            }
15012|
15013|            $metadata['esocialS2299Draft'] = [
15014|                'payload' => $payload,
15015|                'offboardingMemberId' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
15016|                'companyMemberId' => $companyMember->getId(),
15017|                'responsibleId' => $responsible->getId(),
15018|                'eventId' => $event?->getId(),
15019|                'eventStatus' => $eventStatus,
15020|                'missing' => $missing,
15021|                'reviewUrl' => $reviewUrl,
15022|                'updatedAt' => (new \DateTimeImmutable())->format('c'),
15023|            ];
15024|
15025|            $member->setSourceMetadata($metadata);
15026|            $this->entityManager->persist($member);
15027|            $this->entityManager->flush();
15028|
15029|            if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
15030|                $metadata = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? [];
15031|                $metadata['esocialS2299Draft']['eventId'] = $event->getId();
15032|                $member->setSourceMetadata($metadata);
15033|                $this->entityManager->persist($member);
15034|                $this->entityManager->flush();
15035|            }
15036|
15037|            $notificationTitle = 'Revisar desligamento eSocial (S-2299)';
15038|            $notificationMessage = $eventStatus === 'updated'
15039|                ? 'O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi atualizado a partir do offboarding. Abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar os detalhes.'
15040|                : 'O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding. Abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar os detalhes.';
15041|            $notificationMessageHtml = $eventStatus === 'updated'
15042|                ? '<p>O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi atualizado a partir do offboarding.</p>'
15043|                : '<p>O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding.</p>';
15044|            $reviewButtonHtml = '<p style="margin-top:1.25rem;"><a href="' . htmlspecialchars($reviewUrl, ENT_QUOTES, 'UTF-8') . '" style="display:inline-block;background-color:#277591;color:#ffffff;padding:10px 16px;border-radius:6px;font-weight:bold;text-decoration:none;">Revisar desligamento eSocial</a></p>';
15045|
15046|            if ($eventStatus === 'existing_not_editable') {
15047|                $notificationTitle = 'S-2299 oficial já existe e não foi alterado';
15048|                $notificationMessage = 'Já existe um evento S-2299 oficial para {{member_name}} e ele não pode ser editado pelo offboarding. Abra o chat com a Adriana para conferir a situação antes de seguir.';
15049|                $notificationMessageHtml = '<p>Já existe um evento S-2299 oficial para {{member_name}} e ele não pode ser editado pelo offboarding.</p><p>Confira a situação no chat com a Adriana antes de seguir.</p>';
15050|            } elseif (!empty($missing)) {
15051|                $missingLabels = [
15052|                    'esocial_worker_data' => 'dados do trabalhador',
15053|                    'esocial_remuneration_data' => 'dados de remuneração',
15054|                ];
15055|                $missingDescription = implode(' e ', array_map(
15056|                    static fn (string $item): string => $missingLabels[$item] ?? $item,
15057|                    $missing
15058|                ));
15059|
15060|                $notificationTitle = 'Dados eSocial pendentes para gerar S-2299';
15061|                $notificationMessage = 'O S-2299 de {{member_name}} ainda não foi criado porque faltam ' . $missingDescription . '. Complete os dados e abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar.';
15062|                $notificationMessageHtml = '<p>O S-2299 de {{member_name}} ainda não foi criado porque faltam ' . $missingDescription . '.</p><p>Complete os dados e abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar.</p>';
15063|            }
15064|
15065|            $notification = $this->executeNotify([
15066|                'to' => 'company_member',
15067|                'company_member_id' => (string) $responsible->getId(),
15068|                'title' => $notificationTitle,
15069|                'message' => $notificationMessage,
15070|                'message_html' => $notificationMessageHtml . $reviewButtonHtml,
15071|                'system_sender' => true,
15072|            ], $member, array_merge($context, [
15073|                'member_id' => (string) $companyMember->getId(),
15074|                'esocial_s2299_review_url' => $reviewUrl,
15075|            ]));
15076|
15077|            return [
15078|                'success' => true,
15079|                'message' => $event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable'
15080|                    ? 'Rascunho do S-2299 criado/atualizado e responsável notificado'
15081|                    : ($eventStatus === 'existing_not_editable'
15082|                        ? 'Rascunho do S-2299 registrado; já existe evento oficial não editável para este trabalhador'
15083|                        : 'Rascunho do S-2299 registrado; dados eSocial pendentes impedem criar o evento oficial'),
15084|                'offboardingMemberId' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
15085|                'companyMemberId' => $companyMember->getId(),
15086|                'responsibleId' => $responsible->getId(),
15087|                'eventId' => $event?->getId(),
15088|                'eventStatus' => $eventStatus,
15089|                'missing' => $missing,
15090|                'reviewUrl' => $reviewUrl,
15091|                'notification' => $notification,
15092|            ];
15093|        } catch (\Throwable $e) {
15094|            $this->log('error', 'Erro ao criar rascunho S-2299 via offboarding', [
15095|                'error' => $e->getMessage(),
15096|                'memberId' => $member->getId(),
15097|            ]);
15098|
15099|            return ['success' => false, 'error' => $e->getMessage()];
15100|        }
15101|    }
15102|
15103|    private function resolveEsocialS2299Responsible(array $config, FlowInstanceMember $member, \App\Entity\OffboardingMember $offboardingMember): ?CompanyMembers
15104|    {
15105|        $configuredId = $config['responsible_id']
15106|            ?? $config['responsibleId']
15107|            ?? $config['company_member_id']
15108|            ?? $config['member_id']
15109|            ?? null;
15110|
15111|        $flowCompany = $member->getFlowInstance()?->getCompany();
15112|
15113|        if ($configuredId) {
15114|            $responsible = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find((int) $configuredId);
15115|            if (
15116|                $responsible instanceof CompanyMembers
15117|                && $flowCompany instanceof Company
15118|                && $responsible->getCompany()?->getId() === $flowCompany->getId()
15119|            ) {
15120|                return $responsible;
15121|            }
15122|        }
15123|
15124|        $flowResponsible = $member->getFlowInstance()?->getFlowResponsible();
15125|        if ($flowResponsible instanceof CompanyMembers) {
15126|            return $flowResponsible;
15127|        }
15128|
15129|        $offboardingResponsible = $offboardingMember->getOffboarding()?->getOffboardingFlowResponsible();
15130|        if ($offboardingResponsible instanceof CompanyMembers) {
15131|            return $offboardingResponsible;
15132|        }
15133|
15134|        return null;
15135|    }
15136|
15137|    private function buildEsocialS2299DraftPayload(
15138|        \App\Entity\OffboardingMember $offboardingMember,
15139|        CompanyMembers $companyMember,
15140|        CompanyMembers $responsible,
15141|        array $config
15142|    ): array {
15143|        $dismissalDate = $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate();
15144|
15145|        return [
15146|            'member' => $companyMember->getId(),
15147|            'motivoDesligamento' => $config['motivoDesligamento'] ?? $config['mtvDeslig'] ?? '',
15148|            'dataDesligamento' => $dismissalDate ? $dismissalDate->format('Y-m-d') : '',
15149|            'dataConcessaoAviso' => $config['dataConcessaoAviso'] ?? '',
15150|            'avisoPrevioIndenizado' => $config['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ?? '',
15151|            'dataTerminoAviso' => $config['dataTerminoAviso'] ?? '',
15152|            'pensAlim' => $config['pensAlim'] ?? '',
15153|            'percAliment' => $config['percAliment'] ?? '',
15154|            'vrAlim' => $config['vrAlim'] ?? '',
15155|            'numeroProcesso' => $config['numeroProcesso'] ?? '',
15156|            'indPdv' => $config['indPdv'] ?? '',
15157|            'cpfSubstituto' => $config['cpfSubstituto'] ?? '',
15158|            'dataNascimentoTitular' => $config['dataNascimentoTitular'] ?? '',
15159|            'novoCpfTrabalhador' => $config['novoCpfTrabalhador'] ?? '',
15160|            'indRemun' => $config['indRemun'] ?? '',
15161|            'dtFimRemun' => $config['dtFimRemun'] ?? '',
15162|            'matriculaInstituicao' => $config['matriculaInstituicao'] ?? '',
15163|            'numeroContrato' => $config['numeroContrato'] ?? '',
15164|            '_offboarding' => [
15165|                'offboardingMemberId' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
15166|                'offboardingId' => $offboardingMember->getOffboarding()?->getId(),
15167|                'reason' => $offboardingMember->getReason(),
15168|                'responsibleId' => $responsible->getId(),
15169|                'responsibleName' => $responsible->getFullName(),
15170|            ],
15171|        ];
15172|    }
15173|
15174|    private function findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding(
15175|        FlowInstanceMember $member,
15176|        \App\Entity\OffboardingMember $offboardingMember,
15177|        Company $company,
15178|        EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador,
15179|        EsocialDadosRemuneracao $remuneracao
15180|    ): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
15181|    {
15182|        $metadata = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? [];
15183|        if (!is_array($metadata)) {
15184|            return null;
15185|        }
15186|
15187|        $draftMetadata = $metadata['esocialS2299Draft'] ?? null;
15188|        if (
15189|            !is_array($draftMetadata)
15190|            || (int) ($draftMetadata['offboardingMemberId'] ?? 0) !== (int) $offboardingMember->getId()
15191|            || empty($draftMetadata['eventId'])
15192|        ) {
15193|            return null;
15194|        }
15195|
15196|        $event = $this->entityManager
15197|            ->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
15198|            ->find((int) $draftMetadata['eventId']);
15199|
15200|        if (!$event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
15201|            return null;
15202|        }
15203|
15204|        return $this->esocialS2299EventMatchesContext($event, $company, $esocialTrabalhador, $remuneracao, $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate())
15205|            ? $event
15206|            : null;
15207|    }
15208|
15209|    private function findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal(
15210|        Company $company,
15211|        EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador,
15212|        EsocialDadosRemuneracao $remuneracao,
15213|        ?\DateTimeInterface $dismissalDate
15214|    ): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento {
15215|        if (!$dismissalDate instanceof \DateTimeInterface) {
15216|            return null;
15217|        }
15218|
15219|        return $this->entityManager
15220|            ->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
15221|            ->createQueryBuilder('event')
15222|            ->andWhere('event.company = :company')
15223|            ->andWhere('event.esocialTrabalhador = :esocialTrabalhador')
15224|            ->andWhere('event.dadosRemuneracao = :remuneracao')
15225|            ->andWhere('event.dtDeslig = :dismissalDate')
15226|            ->andWhere('event.status != :pendingStatus')
15227|            ->setParameter('company', $company)
15228|            ->setParameter('esocialTrabalhador', $esocialTrabalhador)
15229|            ->setParameter('remuneracao', $remuneracao)
15230|            ->setParameter('dismissalDate', $dismissalDate->format('Y-m-d'))
15231|            ->setParameter('pendingStatus', 'pendente')
15232|            ->orderBy('event.id', 'DESC')
15233|            ->setMaxResults(1)
15234|            ->getQuery()
15235|            ->getOneOrNullResult();
15236|    }
15237|
15238|    private function esocialS2299EventMatchesContext(
15239|        EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $event,
15240|        Company $company,
15241|        EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador,
15242|        EsocialDadosRemuneracao $remuneracao,
15243|        ?\DateTimeInterface $dismissalDate
15244|    ): bool {
15245|        if ($event->getCompany()?->getId() !== $company->getId()) {
15246|            return false;
15247|        }
15248|
15249|        if ($event->getEsocialTrabalhador()?->getId() !== $esocialTrabalhador->getId()) {
15250|            return false;
15251|        }
15252|
15253|        if ($event->getDadosRemuneracao()?->getId() !== $remuneracao->getId()) {
15254|            return false;
15255|        }
15256|
15257|        $eventDismissalDate = $event->getDtDeslig();
15258|        if (!$eventDismissalDate instanceof \DateTimeInterface || !$dismissalDate instanceof \DateTimeInterface) {
15259|            return true;
15260|        }
15261|
15262|        return $eventDismissalDate->format('Y-m-d') === $dismissalDate->format('Y-m-d');
15263|    }
15264|
15265|    private function createEsocialS2299DraftEvent(Company $company, EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador): EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
15266|    {
15267|        $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
15268|        $event->setModo('INC');
15269|        $event->setCompany($company);
15270|        $event->setTpAmb($company->getEsocialMode() ?? '2');
15271|        $event->setTpInscTransmissor(1);
15272|        $event->setNrInscTransmissor($this->onlyDigits((string) $company->getCnpj()));
15273|        $event->setEsocialTrabalhador($esocialTrabalhador);
15274|        $event->setIndRetif(1);
15275|        $event->setStatus('pendente');
15276|        $event->setCreatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
15277|
15278|        return $event;
15279|    }
15280|
15281|    private function applyEsocialS2299Payload(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $event, array $payload, bool $onlyEmptyFields = false): void
15282|    {
15283|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getMtvDeslig(), fn ($value) => $event->setMtvDeslig($value), $this->stringOrNull($payload['motivoDesligamento'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15284|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getDtDeslig(), fn ($value) => $event->setDtDeslig($value), $this->dateOrNull($payload['dataDesligamento'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15285|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getDtAvPrv(), fn ($value) => $event->setDtAvPrv($value), $this->dateOrNull($payload['dataConcessaoAviso'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15286|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getIndPagtoApi(), fn ($value) => $event->setIndPagtoApi($value), $this->booleanStringOrNull($payload['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15287|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getDtProjFimApi(), fn ($value) => $event->setDtProjFimApi($value), $this->dateOrNull($payload['dataTerminoAviso'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15288|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getPensAlim(), fn ($value) => $event->setPensAlim($value), $this->intOrNull($payload['pensAlim'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15289|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getPercAliment(), fn ($value) => $event->setPercAliment($value), $this->decimalOrNull($payload['percAliment'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15290|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getVrAlim(), fn ($value) => $event->setVrAlim($value), $this->decimalOrNull($payload['vrAlim'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15291|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getNrProcTrab(), fn ($value) => $event->setNrProcTrab($value), $this->stringOrNull($payload['numeroProcesso'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15292|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getIndPdv(), fn ($value) => $event->setIndPdv($value), $this->stringOrNull($payload['indPdv'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15293|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getCpfSubstituto(), fn ($value) => $event->setCpfSubstituto($value), $this->cpfOrNull($payload['cpfSubstituto'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15294|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getDtNascto(), fn ($value) => $event->setDtNascto($value), $this->dateOrNull($payload['dataNascimentoTitular'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15295|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getNovoCpf(), fn ($value) => $event->setNovoCpf($value), $this->cpfOrNull($payload['novoCpfTrabalhador'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15296|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getIndRemun(), fn ($value) => $event->setIndRemun($value), $this->intOrNull($payload['indRemun'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15297|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getDtFimRemun(), fn ($value) => $event->setDtFimRemun($value), $this->dateOrNull($payload['dtFimRemun'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15298|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getInsConsig(), fn ($value) => $event->setInsConsig($value), $this->stringOrNull($payload['matriculaInstituicao'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15299|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getNrContr(), fn ($value) => $event->setNrContr($value), $this->stringOrNull($payload['numeroContrato'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15300|    }
15301|
15302|    private function applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(callable $getter, callable $setter, mixed $value, bool $onlyEmptyFields): void
15303|    {
15304|        if ($value === null) {
15305|            return;
15306|        }
15307|
15308|        $currentValue = $getter();
15309|        if ($onlyEmptyFields && $currentValue !== null && $currentValue !== '') {
15310|            return;
15311|        }
15312|
15313|        $setter($value);
15314|    }
15315|
15316|    private function buildEsocialS2299ReviewUrl(CompanyMembers $companyMember): string
15317|    {
15318|        $path = $this->router
15319|            ? $this->router->generate('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => $companyMember->getId()])
15320|            : '/my-company/member/' . $companyMember->getId();
15321|
15322|        return $path . '?esocialTab=desligamento';
15323|    }
15324|
15325|    private function dateOrNull(mixed $value): ?\DateTimeInterface
15326|    {
15327|        if ($value instanceof \DateTimeInterface) {
15328|            return \DateTime::createFromInterface($value);
15329|        }
15330|
15331|        $value = is_scalar($value) ? trim((string) $value) : '';
15332|        if ($value === '') {
15333|            return null;
15334|        }
15335|
15336|        try {
15337|            return new \DateTime($value);
15338|        } catch (\Throwable) {
15339|            return null;
15340|        }
15341|    }
15342|
15343|    private function stringOrNull(mixed $value): ?string
15344|    {
15345|        $value = is_scalar($value) ? trim((string) $value) : '';
15346|        return $value !== '' ? $value : null;
15347|    }
15348|
15349|    private function intOrNull(mixed $value): ?int
15350|    {
15351|        if ($value === null || $value === '') {
15352|            return null;
15353|        }
15354|
15355|        return is_numeric($value) ? (int) $value : null;
15356|    }
15357|
15358|    private function decimalOrNull(mixed $value): ?string
15359|    {
15360|        if ($value === null || $value === '' || !is_scalar($value)) {
15361|            return null;
15362|        }
15363|
15364|        $normalized = str_replace(['R$', '%', ' '], '', trim((string) $value));
15365|        if ($normalized === '') {
15366|            return null;
15367|        }
15368|
15369|        if (str_contains($normalized, ',')) {
15370|            $normalized = str_replace('.', '', $normalized);
15371|            $normalized = str_replace(',', '.', $normalized);
15372|        }
15373|
15374|        return is_numeric($normalized) ? number_format((float) $normalized, 2, '.', '') : null;
15375|    }
15376|
15377|    private function booleanStringOrNull(mixed $value): ?string
15378|    {
15379|        if ($value === null || $value === '') {
15380|            return null;
15381|        }
15382|
15383|        if (is_bool($value)) {
15384|            return $value ? 'S' : 'N';
15385|        }
15386|
15387|        $normalized = strtoupper(trim((string) $value));
15388|        if (in_array($normalized, ['S', 'SIM', 'YES', 'TRUE', '1'], true)) {
15389|            return 'S';
15390|        }
15391|        if (in_array($normalized, ['N', 'NAO', 'NÃO', 'NO', 'FALSE', '0'], true)) {
15392|            return 'N';
15393|        }
15394|
15395|        return null;
15396|    }
15397|
15398|    private function cpfOrNull(mixed $value): ?string
15399|    {
15400|        $digits = $this->onlyDigits(is_scalar($value) ? (string) $value : '');
15401|        return $digits !== '' ? $digits : null;
15402|    }
15403|
15404|    private function onlyDigits(string $value): string
15405|    {
15406|        return preg_replace('/\D/', '', $value) ?? '';
15407|    }
15408|
15409|    // ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
15410|    // VISIBILIDADE E ACESSO - OFFBOARDING
15411|    // ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
15412|
15413|    /**
15414|     * Ação: Aguardar X dias para exibir offboarding ao colaborador
15415|     * 
15416|     * Esta ação configura um delay antes do offboarding ser visível para o colaborador.
15417|     * O offboarding só será exibido na tela do colaborador após X dias.
15418|     * 
15419|     * - Define `visible_to_collaborator = false` imediatamente

Note: Results truncated to 500 lines. Please narrow your line range.
Request #8 deepseek-v4-flash P:52.52K C:2.12K CR:44.54K CW:0 17543ms
Reasoning
I now have good detail. Let me consider a concrete defect in the update semantics. Now, the payload's motivoDesligamento is empty string by default (since config is empty in the seed). Actually, wait — the offboarding has a reason (motivo) selected by the user. In the seed, motivo of desligamento is a required data for eSocial S-2299 (mtvDeslig). The automation doesn't map offboarding reason to mtvDeslig; only storing it inside `_offboarding.reason`. But given the flow "pré-preenchido para revisão", the motivo is a central field. Hmm, but maybe the offboarding's motivo for desligamento has a code that maps. Let's check OffboardingMember::getReason and the possible values (offboarding reasons). Search templates for "reason" in offboarding. Also, another critical check: in `buildEsocialS2299DraftPayload`, `'motivoDesligamento' => $config['motivoDesligamento'] ?? $config['mtvDeslig'] ?? ''`. Because config preset is 'to' => flow_responsible, no motivo configured. But could there be a default in the automation config stored as JSON action_config? In the seeded flow automation they set `'actionConfig' => ['to' => 'flow_responsible', '_default_automation_id' => ...]`, no motivo. So draft mtvDeslig null. For an "official" S-2299 event, mtvDeslig is nullable in the DB but required in the eSocial schema. Creating an event row with all null fields is okay for the DB. But then the notification says "O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado..." — an empty shell event created that later can be edited. That's arguably by design as a draft. Hmm, so the no-validation concern is moderate. Now, let me focus on what's concrete and reportable: **Finding A (real bug candidate):** In `findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal`, `event.dtDeslig = :dismissalDate` where parameter is a string `'Y-m-d'`; DQL comparing a date field to a string param. Doctrine will pass the string and the DB will compare to date column. `->setParameter('dismissalDate', $dismissalDate->format('Y-m-d'))` - as string. It compares date to 'YYYY-MM-DD' string. MySQL compares date to string fine. In SQLite? Probably DB is MySQL (uses NOW(), JSON functions). So fine. **Finding B (system_sender refactor):** The change in the notify logic generalized the payroll-system-sender behavior to any `system_sender=true` config, including the new action — which was the intent. Need to check that executeNotify uses `config['system_sender']` at message send path, and the chat created in assistant conversation requires the user to have assistant availability. It's fine. But wait: the earlier refactor at line ~7039 added `'system_sender' => $config['system_sender'] ?? null` inside emailConfig — which is for email sending. `emailConfig` for the direct email? Actually, system_sender may be used in executeNotify building config... The refactor changed `$isPayrollSystemSender` to `$isSystemSender`, which checks `config['system_sender']`. Then in the new action they pass system_sender => true. So the notification is sent as system (Adriana). Good. **Finding C (concrete bug):** The notification includes the `reviewUrl` in the button link that points to `my_company_member_manage` with `?esocialTab=desligamento`. The responsible may or may not have access to that page. But presumably same company member so okay. **Finding D:** `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` checks `$company->getEsocialMode() === null` => returns skipped. Fine. **Finding E:** Look at the check `$event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $event->getStatus() !== 'pendente'` => existing_not_editable. But in the *else* branch from metadata-not-linked, `findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal` searches for status != pendente events only. So if there is an existing *pendente* event (not linked via metadata), the new code creates another pendente event — duplicating. But wait: For events not linked via metadata, the query excludes pendente events. So if the user manually created a pendente draft through the regular UI (saveEventS2299), and then the offboarding automation runs, it creates ANOTHER pendente event (duplicate draft). The automation claims idempotent. Race/duplicate scenario: An existing pendente draft not created by this automation (i.e., created in the member's esocial desligamento tab) would not be found, and a second event would be created. Is that scenario plausible? The reason they exclude pendente in the "findExisting" query is probably because the official events search should skip the pendente draft created by this automation itself (which is found via metadata). But a pendente draft created via UI would be duplicated. Hmm — is it actually a real scenario? On the "aba desligamento", the user may create an S-2299 official draft? Actually the UI (saveEventS2299) always sets status 'pendente'. So all UI-created S-2299s start as 'pendente'. So a user manually creating the event first, then offboarding final stage runs automation — duplicate! That's a plausible correctness bug. But is it likely? Offboarding automation fires when the member enters the final stage. The responsible could have already recorded the event through the S-2299 tab. Hmm, this is a medium concern — plausible but speculative. Actually, wait — is a UI-created pending S-2299 "editável"? In the automation, when a metadata-linked event is found with status pendente -> 'updated' (editable). And existing-not-editable for non-pendente (official). The duplication is only when event exists but is not linked to this flow's metadata. The query intentionally excludes 'pendente' to avoid matching its own previously-created draft that isn't yet in metadata (i.e., crash between persist and metadata save). Because the second flush persists eventId into metadata. So the window is small, but there is a real edge: any pre-existing pendente event (e.g., user made draft in UI earlier) gets duplicated. I could flag as medium. But is it within "concrete failure mode"? I think it's a decent medium finding: "idempotência" claim has gap. Let me be careful about precision-over-recall: I should report only likely-real defects. This duplication scenario is plausible enough given UI creates pendente events for the same member+remuneracao+date. Let me verify how UI events relate to companyMember/remuneracao and whether same dismissal date would match the "created" branch. Wait actually the duplication arises because for an existing pendente (non-metadata-linked) event, the flow goes: metadata-linked returns null → findExisting... excludes pendente → create new event with status created → new draft. Yes duplicate. **Finding F (timing / concurrency less important).** **Finding G (missing tests).** Low. Now the migration concerns. Let me weigh the tenancy issue (#1): Since this migration is global and seeds offboarding product to all companies with workflow slug 'fluxo-de-saida', I should verify whether this "workflows" table is per-company global or if each company gets its own row. Actually the table `workflows` includes a `company_id`, and the seed filters rows by slug only. This means all companies with a "fluxo-de-saida" workflow get the offboarding template seeded, including companies that don't have offboarding enabled (e.g., not entitled). Let's check how the system decides whether a company may use offboarding — whether it's via product catalog only or per-company package/entitlement. Search for how products get associated with companies, e.g., `company_product` or service packages, "product" activation per company. Given offboarding is a product and in this codebase there is probably an "is_default"/product module gate. Actually, since this is review, we need to comment on the diff: the migration seeds all companies' exit workflows without checking whether each company actually contracted the offboarding product. If the codebase determines product availability per-company elsewhere (like a modules entitlement / service package), then exposing template/automations to companies that didn't pay would be a problem. But the doc explicitly covers seeding behavior and says it's intended globally for those with workflow slug. I'll raise as an "Atenção" (medium) rather than high, and request confirmation. Actually the review plan marks it high. Let me at least search how offboarding product availability is gated per company. Search for 'offboarding' slug references in src to find gating logic (e.g., in Company or in catalog). Search 'offboarding' in src/Controller or elsewhere. Let me search.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "offboarding", "file_patterns": ["src/Service/", "src/Repository/", "src/Entity/"]}
Note: The results have been truncated. Only showing first 100 results.
File: src/Entity/FlowActivity.php
Match lines: 7
66|     * ID do OffboardingTypeActivity (tipo de atividade do offboarding)
67|     * Usado para filtrar offboardings que têm atividades do mesmo tipo
69|    private $offboardingActivityTypeId;
153|    public function getOffboardingActivityTypeId(): ?int
155|        return $this->offboardingActivityTypeId;
158|    public function setOffboardingActivityTypeId(?int $offboardingActivityTypeId): self
160|        $this->offboardingActivityTypeId = $offboardingActivityTypeId;

File: src/Entity/FlowAutomationRequest.php
Match lines: 1
61|     * Tipo de solicitação: assign_onboarding_flow, assign_offboarding_flow, assign_other_bpmn_flow, move_stage, start_assessment

File: src/Entity/Offboarding.php
Match lines: 21
8| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass="App\Repository\OffboardingRepository")
10|class Offboarding
36|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="App\Entity\OffboardingCategory") 
59|    private $steps;  // Lista de IDs de etapas de offboarding
62|     * Responsável pelo fluxo do offboarding (definido na criação via BPM).
63|     * Diferente do responsible de atividade, este é único para o offboarding inteiro.
66|     * @ORM\JoinColumn(name="offboarding_flow_responsible_id", referencedColumnName="id", nullable=true)
68|    private ?CompanyMembers $offboardingFlowResponsible = null;
119|    public function getCategory(): ?OffboardingCategory
124|    public function setCategory(?OffboardingCategory $category): self
179|    public function addStepToOffboarding(int $offboardingStepId): void
182|        if (!in_array($offboardingStepId, $steps, true)) {
183|            $steps[] = $offboardingStepId;
189|    public function removeStepFromOffboarding(int $stepId): bool
209|     * Verifica se uma etapa específica está no offboarding
217|    public function getOffboardingFlowResponsible(): ?CompanyMembers
219|        return $this->offboardingFlowResponsible;
222|    public function setOffboardingFlowResponsible(?CompanyMembers $offboardingFlowResponsible): self
224|        $this->offboardingFlowResponsible = $offboardingFlowResponsible;
230|     * Retorna o número total de etapas no offboarding
239|     * Remove todas as etapas do offboarding

File: src/Entity/OffboardingActivity.php
Match lines: 14
8| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass="App\Repository\OffboardingActivityRepository")
9| * @ORM\Table(name="offboarding_activity")
11|class OffboardingActivity
27|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="App\Entity\OffboardingTypeActivity")
30|    private ?OffboardingTypeActivity $offboardingTypeActivity = null;
75|    private ?array $offboardingSignatureFiles = null;
143|    public function getOffboardingTypeActivity(): ?OffboardingTypeActivity
145|        return $this->offboardingTypeActivity;
148|    public function setOffboardingTypeActivity(?OffboardingTypeActivity $offboardingTypeActivity): self
150|        $this->offboardingTypeActivity = $offboardingTypeActivity;
242|    public function getOffboardingSignatureFiles(): ?array
244|        return $this->offboardingSignatureFiles;
247|    public function setOffboardingSignatureFiles(?array $offboardingSignatureFiles): self
249|        $this->offboardingSignatureFiles = $offboardingSignatureFiles;

File: src/Entity/OffboardingCategory.php
Match lines: 2
8| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass="App\Repository\OffboardingCategoryRepository")
10|class OffboardingCategory

File: src/Entity/OffboardingMember.php
Match lines: 31
8| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass="App\Repository\OffboardingMemberRepository")
10| * @ORM\Table(name="offboarding_members")
12|class OffboardingMember
28|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity=Offboarding::class)
31|    private $offboarding;
45|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity=OffboardingMemberStatus::class, )
111|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="App\Entity\OffboardingStep")
117|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="App\Entity\OffboardingActivity")
135|    private $hasStartedOffboarding = false;
140|    private $hasFinishedOffboarding = false;
226|    public function getOffboarding(): ?Offboarding
228|        return $this->offboarding;
231|    public function setOffboarding(?Offboarding $offboarding): self
233|        $this->offboarding = $offboarding;
259|    public function getStatus(): ?OffboardingMemberStatus
264|    public function setStatus(?OffboardingMemberStatus $status): self
391|    public function getCurrentStep(): ?OffboardingStep
396|    public function setCurrentStep(?OffboardingStep $currentStep): self
402|    public function getCurrentActivity(): ?OffboardingActivity
407|    public function setCurrentActivity(?OffboardingActivity $currentActivity): self
435|    public function getHasStartedOffboarding(): ?bool
437|        return $this->hasStartedOffboarding;
440|    public function setHasStartedOffboarding(bool $hasStartedOffboarding): self
442|        $this->hasStartedOffboarding = $hasStartedOffboarding;
446|    public function getHasFinishedOffboarding(): ?bool
448|        return $this->hasFinishedOffboarding;
451|    public function setHasFinishedOffboarding(bool $hasFinishedOffboarding): self
453|        $this->hasFinishedOffboarding = $hasFinishedOffboarding;
532|    public function setActivityStatus(int $stepId, int $activityId, int $offboardingTypeActivityId, bool $released, bool $started, bool $concluded): self 
576|                    'offboardingTypeActivityId' => $offboardingTypeActivityId, // NOVO CAMPO
584|                'offboardingTypeActivityId' => $offboardingTypeActivityId, // NOVO CAMPO

File: src/Entity/OffboardingMemberSignature.php
Match lines: 13
8| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass="App\Repository\OffboardingMemberSignatureRepository")
10|class OffboardingMemberSignature
20|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="App\Entity\OffboardingMember")
23|    private OffboardingMember $offboardingMember;
26|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="App\Entity\OffboardingSignatureFileType")
27|     * @ORM\JoinColumn(name="offboarding_signature_file_type_id", referencedColumnName="id", nullable=false, onDelete="CASCADE")
29|    private OffboardingSignatureFileType $signatureFileType;
44|    public function getOffboardingMember(): OffboardingMember
46|        return $this->offboardingMember;
49|    public function setOffboardingMember(OffboardingMember $offboardingMember): self
51|        $this->offboardingMember = $offboardingMember;
55|    public function getSignatureFileType(): OffboardingSignatureFileType
60|    public function setSignatureFileType(OffboardingSignatureFileType $signatureFileType): self

File: src/Entity/OffboardingMemberStatus.php
Match lines: 3
10| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass="App\Repository\OffboardingMemberStatusRepository")
11| * @ORM\Table(name="offboarding_member_status")
13|class OffboardingMemberStatus

File: src/Entity/OffboardingSignatureFileType.php
Match lines: 3
8| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass="App\Repository\OffboardingSignatureFileTypeRepository")
9| * @ORM\Table(name="offboarding_signature_file_type")
11|class OffboardingSignatureFileType

File: src/Entity/OffboardingStep.php
Match lines: 8
8| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass="App\Repository\OffboardingStepRepository")
10|class OffboardingStep
26|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="App\Entity\Offboarding")
29|    private $offboarding;
92|    public function getOffboarding(): ?Offboarding
94|        return $this->offboarding;
97|    public function setOffboarding(?Offboarding $offboarding): self
99|        $this->offboarding = $offboarding;

File: src/Entity/OffboardingTypeActivity.php
Match lines: 3
8| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass="App\Repository\OffboardingTypeActivityRepository")
9| * @ORM\Table(name="offboarding_type_activity")
11|class OffboardingTypeActivity

File: src/Entity/Process.php
Match lines: 1
361|     * Indica se o processo foi criado via automacao BPM (offboarding -> PS).

File: src/Entity/ServicePackage.php
Match lines: 3
39|        'offboarding' => [
40|            'label' => 'Offboarding',
434|        'offboarding' => 'Controla o acesso aos fluxos de desligamento.',

File: src/Repository/FlowActivityRepository.php
Match lines: 2
36|                'fa.offboardingActivityTypeId AS offboarding_activity_type_id',
48|            ->addGroupBy('fa.offboardingActivityTypeId')

File: src/Repository/FlowInstanceMemberRepository.php
Match lines: 2
180|                if ($sourceType === 'offboarding' && $member->getCurrentStage()) {
249|                if ($sourceType === 'offboarding' && $result['stageId'] !== null && isset($counts[$result['stageId']])) {

File: src/Repository/OffboardingActivityRepository.php
Match lines: 3
5|use App\Entity\OffboardingActivity;
9|class OffboardingActivityRepository extends ServiceEntityRepository
13|        parent::__construct($registry, OffboardingActivity::class);

File: src/Repository/OffboardingCategoryRepository.php
Match lines: 5
2|// src/Repository/OffboardingCategoryRepository.php
6|use App\Entity\OffboardingCategory;
10|class OffboardingCategoryRepository extends ServiceEntityRepository
14|        parent::__construct($registry, OffboardingCategory::class);
19|    // public function findByName(string $name): ?OffboardingCategory

File: src/Repository/OffboardingMemberRepository.php
Match lines: 36
5|use App\Entity\OffboardingMember;
7|use App\Entity\Offboarding;
8|use App\Entity\OffboardingMemberStatus;
15| * @extends ServiceEntityRepository<OffboardingMember>
17| * @method OffboardingMember|null find($id, $lockMode = null, $lockVersion = null)
18| * @method OffboardingMember|null findOneBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null)
19| * @method OffboardingMember[]    findAll()
20| * @method OffboardingMember[]    findBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null, $limit = null, $offset = null)
22|class OffboardingMemberRepository extends ServiceEntityRepository
26|        parent::__construct($registry, OffboardingMember::class);
29|    public function save(OffboardingMember $entity, bool $flush = false): void
38|    public function remove(OffboardingMember $entity, bool $flush = false): void
48|     * Find offboarding members by company
61|     * Find offboarding members by company member
69|     * Find offboarding members by offboarding process
71|    public function findByOffboarding(Offboarding $offboarding): array
73|        return $this->findBy(['offboarding' => $offboarding], ['requestedAt' => 'DESC']);
77|     * Find offboarding members by status
79|    public function findByStatus(OffboardingMemberStatus $status): array
85|     * Find visible offboarding members for collaborator
100|     * Find offboarding members requested by admin
108|     * Find offboarding members with sent letters
116|     * Find latest offboarding members with pagination
151|            fn($offboardingMember) => $offboardingMember->getCompanyMember(),
157|     * Retorna true se existir ao menos um OffboardingMember
158|     * para este CompanyMembers cujo Offboarding tenha
161|    public function getBlockedOffboardingInfoForMember(CompanyMembers $companyMember): array
165|            ->innerJoin('om.offboarding', 'o')
182|    public function getOffboardingRequestSummaryByCompany(Company $company): array
202|     * Picklist for Comité IA UC1 — each row is an OffboardingMember (disciplinary / dismissal case).
212|            ->leftJoin('om.offboarding', 'ob')
219|        /** @var list<OffboardingMember> $rows */
225|            $label = $this->buildHcmSpecializedOffboardingCaseLabel($om);
238|                'offboardingMemberId' => (int) $om->getId(),
245|    private function buildHcmSpecializedOffboardingCaseLabel(OffboardingMember $om): string
249|        $offName = trim((string) ($om->getOffboarding()?->getName() ?? ''));

File: src/Repository/OffboardingMemberSignatureRepository.php
Match lines: 3
5|use App\Entity\OffboardingMemberSignature;
9|class OffboardingMemberSignatureRepository extends ServiceEntityRepository
13|        parent::__construct($registry, OffboardingMemberSignature::class);

File: src/Repository/OffboardingMemberStatusRepository.php
Match lines: 11
5|use App\Entity\OffboardingMemberStatus;
10| * @extends ServiceEntityRepository<OffboardingMemberStatus>
12| * @method OffboardingMemberStatus|null find($id, $lockMode = null, $lockVersion = null)
13| * @method OffboardingMemberStatus|null findOneBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null)
14| * @method OffboardingMemberStatus[]    findAll()
15| * @method OffboardingMemberStatus[]    findBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null, $limit = null, $offset = null)
17|class OffboardingMemberStatusRepository extends ServiceEntityRepository
21|        parent::__construct($registry, OffboardingMemberStatus::class);
24|    public function save(OffboardingMemberStatus $entity, bool $flush = false): void
33|    public function remove(OffboardingMemberStatus $entity, bool $flush = false): void
45|    public function findByName(string $name): ?OffboardingMemberStatus

File: src/Repository/OffboardingRepository.php
Match lines: 20
2|// src/Repository/OffboardingRepository.php
6|use App\Entity\Offboarding;
9|use App\Entity\OffboardingStep;
10|use App\Entity\OffboardingActivity;
15|class OffboardingRepository extends ServiceEntityRepository
19|        parent::__construct($registry, Offboarding::class);
23|     * Offboardings da empresa para listagem (ex.: tela /offboarding).
24|     * Exclui os "duplicados legados" criados com prefixo "Offboarding - " (sem etapas).
32|            ->setParameter('legacyPrefix', 'Offboarding - %')
38|    public function findOffboardingsByResponsible(CompanyMembers $companyMember): array
43|        // 1. Busca todos os OffboardingStep com atividades
44|        $steps = $em->getRepository(OffboardingStep::class)->findAll();
46|        $offboardingIds = [];
53|                    $activity = $em->getRepository(OffboardingActivity::class)->find($activityId);
56|                        $offboardingId = $step->getOffboarding()->getId();
57|                        $offboardingIds[$offboardingId] = true; // evita duplicados
61|                    error_log("Erro ao buscar OffboardingActivity com ID {$activityId}: " . $e->getMessage());
67|        if (empty($offboardingIds)) {
71|        return $em->getRepository(Offboarding::class)->findBy([
72|            'id' => array_keys($offboardingIds),

File: src/Repository/OffboardingSignatureFileTypeRepository.php
Match lines: 3
5|use App\Entity\OffboardingSignatureFileType;
9|class OffboardingSignatureFileTypeRepository extends ServiceEntityRepository
13|        parent::__construct($registry, OffboardingSignatureFileType::class);

File: src/Repository/OffboardingStepRepository.php
Match lines: 13
6|use App\Entity\OffboardingStep;
7|use App\Entity\OffboardingActivity;
8|use App\Entity\Offboarding;
13| * @method OffboardingStep|null find($id, $lockMode = null, $lockVersion = null)
14| * @method OffboardingStep|null findOneBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null)
15| * @method OffboardingStep[]    findAll()
16| * @method OffboardingStep[]    findBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null, $limit = null, $offset = null)
18|class OffboardingStepRepository extends ServiceEntityRepository
22|        parent::__construct($registry, OffboardingStep::class);
25|    public function findStepsByResponsibleInOffboarding(CompanyMembers $companyMember, Offboarding $offboarding): array
28|        $steps = $this->findBy(['offboarding' => $offboarding]);
37|                    $activity = $em->getRepository(OffboardingActivity::class)->find($activityId);
44|                    error_log("Erro ao buscar OffboardingActivity com ID {$activityId}: " . $e->getMessage());

File: src/Repository/OffboardingTypeActivityRepository.php
Match lines: 3
5|use App\Entity\OffboardingTypeActivity;
9|class OffboardingTypeActivityRepository extends ServiceEntityRepository
13|        parent::__construct($registry, OffboardingTypeActivity::class);

File: src/Repository/SuggestionRepository.php
Match lines: 1
43|            if ($tool->getDisplayName() === 'Offboarding') {

File: src/Service/Adriana/AdrianaContextProviderService.php
Match lines: 38
16|use App\Entity\OffboardingCategory;
21|use App\Entity\Offboarding;
22|use App\Entity\OffboardingActivity;
23|use App\Entity\OffboardingStep;
352|            'offboarding' => 'offboarding',
439|                'saida' => ['offboarding'],
587|                'offboarding_categories' => [],
605|                'existing_offboardings' => [],
618|            'offboarding_categories' => $this->fetchSimpleOptions(OffboardingCategory::class, $company, 'name'),
636|            'existing_offboardings' => $this->fetchCompatibleExistingOffboardings($company, $currentState),
1251|    private function fetchExistingOffboardings($company): array
1254|            $items = $this->entityManager->getRepository(Offboarding::class)
1266|    private function fetchCompatibleExistingOffboardings($company, array $currentState): array
1271|            return $this->fetchExistingOffboardings($company);
1280|            if ($this->isVariableOffboardingTemplate($template)) {
1281|                return $this->fetchExistingOffboardings($company);
1284|            $templateSignature = $this->buildFixedOffboardingTemplateSignature($template);
1289|            $items = $this->entityManager->getRepository(Offboarding::class)
1296|        foreach ($items as $offboarding) {
1297|            if (!$offboarding instanceof Offboarding) {
1301|            $offboardingSignature = $this->buildExistingOffboardingSignature($offboarding);
1302|            if ($offboardingSignature !== $templateSignature) {
1306|            $id = (int) $offboarding->getId();
1307|            $label = trim((string) $offboarding->getName());
1324|    private function isVariableOffboardingTemplate(FlowTemplate $template): bool
1329|            if ($slug === 'offboarding' && (string) ($templateProduct->getTemplateType() ?? 'fixo') === 'variavel') {
1340|    private function buildFixedOffboardingTemplateSignature(FlowTemplate $template): array
1346|            if ($stageSlug !== 'offboarding') {
1352|                $typeId = method_exists($activity, 'getOffboardingActivityTypeId') ? (int) ($activity->getOffboardingActivityTypeId() ?? 0) : 0;
1375|    private function buildExistingOffboardingSignature(Offboarding $offboarding): array
1377|        $stepIds = array_values(array_filter(array_map('intval', (array) ($offboarding->getSteps() ?? []))));
1384|            $step = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingStep::class)->find($stepId);
1385|            if (!$step instanceof OffboardingStep) {
1391|                $activity = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingActivity::class)->find((int) $activityId);
1392|                if (!$activity instanceof OffboardingActivity) {
1395|                $typeActivity = $activity->getOffboardingTypeActivity();
1619|            'offboarding',
1651|            'offboarding' => 'Offboarding',

File: src/Service/Adriana/AdrianaWorkflowChatService.php
Match lines: 3
392|                    'offboarding' => 'Offboarding',
928|                    'offboarding' => 'Offboarding',
971|        $enabledSlugs = ['processo_seletivo', 'onboarding', 'offboarding', 'crm', 'nps-com-ia', 'pdi', 'treinamentos', 'assessment-360', 'structural-research', 'pulse-survey', 'jornada-metahuman'];

File: src/Service/Adriana/Instance/Product/OffboardingInstanceHandler.php
Match lines: 16
9|final class OffboardingInstanceHandler implements AdrianaInstanceProductHandlerInterface
17|        return $this->fieldCatalog->canonicalize($productSlug) === 'offboarding';
45|                $errors[] = 'offboarding_existingProcessId_missing';
54|            $errors[] = 'offboarding_name_missing';
59|            $errors[] = 'offboarding_description_missing';
65|        foreach (['_status_defined' => 'offboarding_status_missing', '_block_access_defined' => 'offboarding_block_access_missing'] as $flag => $error) {
73|                $errors[] = 'offboarding_' . $requiredIdField . '_missing';
84|                $errors[] = 'offboarding_custom_steps_missing';
89|                $errors[] = 'offboarding_steps_missing';
95|            $errors[] = 'offboarding_' . str_replace(['.', '__'], ['_', ''], $field) . '_missing';
200|            return [$this->missing('etapas.__missing', 'Etapas do offboarding', 'object_list')];
299|            'product' => 'offboarding',
355|                'tipo' => 'offboarding',
374|            if ($stageSlug !== 'offboarding') {
397|            $typeId = method_exists($activity, 'getOffboardingActivityTypeId')
398|                ? (int) ($activity->getOffboardingActivityTypeId() ?? 0)

File: src/Service/Adriana/Questionnaire/Register/Handler/OnboardingOffboardingFluxoRegisterHandler.php
Match lines: 14
12| * Fluxos operacionais de onboarding/offboarding (documentos, atividades, desligamento).
14|final class OnboardingOffboardingFluxoRegisterHandler implements QuestionnaireRegisterHandlerInterface
18|        'adicionar_documento_assinatura_offboarding',
20|        'adicionar_atividade_offboarding',
49|            'adicionar_documento_assinatura_offboarding' => $this->processor->processCreateOffboardingSignatureFileType(
57|            'adicionar_atividade_offboarding' => $this->processor->processCreateOffboardingActivity(
61|            'solicitar_desligamento' => $this->processor->processRequestOffboarding(
70|            'desligamento_membro' => $this->processor->processRequestOffboarding(
79|            'aceitar_recusar_solicitacao' => $this->processor->processDecisionOffboardingRequest(
83|            default => throw new \InvalidArgumentException("Tipo fluxo onboarding/offboarding inválido: {$tipo}"),
88|        $routeName = str_contains($tipo, 'offboarding') || in_array($tipo, [
93|            ? 'offboarding_index'
104|            'adicionar_documento_assinatura', 'adicionar_documento_assinatura_offboarding' => 'Documento de assinatura criado com sucesso!',
105|            'adicionar_atividade_onboarding', 'adicionar_atividade_offboarding' => 'Atividade criada com sucesso!',

File: src/Service/Adriana/Questionnaire/Register/Handler/OnboardingOffboardingRegisterHandler.php
Match lines: 6
11|final class OnboardingOffboardingRegisterHandler implements QuestionnaireRegisterHandlerInterface
15|        'criar_offboarding',
41|            'criar_offboarding' => $this->processor->processCreateOffboarding(
45|            default => throw new \InvalidArgumentException("Tipo onboarding/offboarding inválido: {$tipo}"),
51|        $routeName = $tipo === 'criar_onboarding' ? 'onboarding_index' : 'offboarding_index';
59|            : 'Offboarding criado com sucesso!';

File: src/Service/Adriana/Retrieval/WorkflowRetrievalProductLexicon.php
Match lines: 2
37|        'offboarding' => [
38|            'offboarding',

File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowActivitySuggestionService.php
Match lines: 27
8|use App\Entity\OffboardingTypeActivity;
94|                $offboardingTypeId = isset($activity['offboarding_activity_type_id']) ? (int) $activity['offboarding_activity_type_id'] : null;
100|                $matched = $this->matchOptionInList($allowedByStage[$stageOrder] ?? [], $activityType, $onboardingTypeId, $offboardingTypeId);
102|                    $matched = $this->matchOptionInList($this->getActivityOptionsForProduct($productSlug), $activityType, $onboardingTypeId, $offboardingTypeId);
121|     * identity. Type-based products (onboarding/offboarding) match by their
127|    private function matchOptionInList(array $options, string $activityType, ?int $onboardingTypeId, ?int $offboardingTypeId): ?array
136|            if ($offboardingTypeId !== null) {
137|                if ((int) ($option['offboarding_activity_type_id'] ?? 0) === $offboardingTypeId) {
464|                if (isset($activityData['offboarding_activity_type_id'])) {
465|                    $activity->setOffboardingActivityTypeId((int) $activityData['offboarding_activity_type_id']);
530|            if (!in_array($productSlug, ['processo_seletivo', 'onboarding', 'offboarding'], true)) {
549|            'saida' => ['offboarding'],
637|            'offboarding' => $this->buildOffboardingTypeActivityOptions(),
651|        if (isset($option['offboarding_activity_type_id'])) {
652|            return 'off:' . (int) $option['offboarding_activity_type_id'];
685|            $offboardingTypeId = $row['offboarding_activity_type_id'] ?? null;
687|            // Type-based products (onboarding/offboarding) collapse by their type
691|            } elseif ($offboardingTypeId !== null) {
692|                $key = 'off:' . (int) $offboardingTypeId;
711|            if ($offboardingTypeId !== null) {
712|                $candidate['offboarding_activity_type_id'] = (int) $offboardingTypeId;
774|    private function buildOffboardingTypeActivityOptions(): array
776|        $rows = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingTypeActivity::class)->findBy(['isActive' => true]);
779|            if (!$typeActivity instanceof OffboardingTypeActivity || !$typeActivity->getId()) {
786|                'activity_type' => 'offboarding',
787|                'offboarding_activity_type_id' => $typeActivity->getId(),
886|            'offboarding' => 'Offboarding',

File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowAiOutputValidatorService.php
Match lines: 7
15|use App\Service\Adriana\Instance\Product\OffboardingInstanceHandler;
246|    public function validateInstancePlan(array $instancePlan, User $user, array $enabledProductSlugs = ['processo_seletivo', 'onboarding', 'offboarding', 'crm', 'nps-com-ia', 'pdi', 'treinamentos', 'assessment-360', 'structural-research', 'pulse-survey', 'jornada-metahuman']): array
313|        if (!in_array($route, ['create-processo-seletivo-completo', 'create-onboarding', 'create-offboarding', 'create-linked-records', 'jornada-metahuman'], true)) {
349|                if ($slug === 'offboarding' && $route !== 'create-offboarding') {
350|                    $errors[] = 'offboarding_route_invalid';
405|        if (WorkflowDomainCatalog::canonicalizeProductSlug($slug) === 'offboarding') {
406|            return new OffboardingInstanceHandler(new WorkflowInstanceFieldCatalog());

File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowBpmEligibilityGuard.php
Match lines: 1
212|            'offboarding' => 'Offboarding',

File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowConversationOrchestratorService.php
Match lines: 50
24|        'offboarding',
122|                'assistant_message' => 'O fluxo já está criado. Posso preparar instâncias pela Adriana para Processo Seletivo, Onboarding, Offboarding e CRM; para outros produtos, você pode iniciar pela tela do fluxo. Se quiser montar um novo fluxo, é só me dizer.',
465|        return 'Consigo criar instâncias pela Adriana apenas para Processo Seletivo, Onboarding, Offboarding e CRM neste momento.'
467|            . ' Onboarding e Offboarding existentes seguem compatibilidade no template fixo e ficam livres de filtro no template variável.'
1748|            'offboarding',
2131|     * desired model in their initial request (e.g. "fluxo de offboarding com
2764|            'offboarding' => [
2765|                'label' => 'Offboarding',
2766|                'aliases' => ['offboarding', 'desligamento'],
3331|            'offboarding' => 'Offboarding',
3401|            'offboarding' => 'saida',
3841|            'saida' => ['offboarding'],
3887|            'offboarding' => 'Offboarding',
4409|                case 'offboarding':
4412|                    $slots = $this->prefillOptionFieldByName($slots, $state, $slug, 'categoryId', 'offboarding_categories', 'int', 'categoria', $message);
4695|     * Pre-fills the optional toggles shared by onboarding/offboarding processes:
5293|        if ($slug === 'offboarding') {
5294|            return !empty($instanceOptions['existing_offboardings']);
5415|        if (in_array($productSlug, ['onboarding', 'offboarding'], true)) {
5495|        if (in_array($productSlug, ['onboarding', 'offboarding'], true) && $field === 'existingProcessId') {
5779|        if (!in_array($productSlug, ['onboarding', 'offboarding'], true)) {
5929|            if ($this->containsAnyTerm($normalized, ['onboarding', 'inicio do onboarding', 'início do onboarding', 'offboarding', 'inicio do offboarding', 'início do offboarding'])) {
6332|        if (in_array($productSlug, ['onboarding', 'offboarding'], true) && is_int($existingValue) && !$this->isListedInstanceOption($state, $existingOptionSource, $existingValue)) {
6348|            if (in_array($productSlug, ['onboarding', 'offboarding'], true)) {
6382|                if (in_array($productSlug, ['onboarding', 'offboarding'], true) && !$this->isListedInstanceOption($state, $existingOptionSource, $existingId)) {
6397|                if (in_array($productSlug, ['onboarding', 'offboarding'], true)) {
6464|        if (in_array($productSlug, ['onboarding', 'offboarding'], true) && isset($slots['_activation_choice_made']) && ($slots['_activation'] ?? null) === 'active') {
6488|            'offboarding' => 'existing_offboardings',
6841|        if (in_array($productSlug, ['onboarding', 'offboarding'], true) && $field === 'existingProcessId') {
6842|            $optionsSource = $productSlug === 'offboarding' ? 'existing_offboardings' : 'existing_onboardings';
6843|            $productLabel = $productSlug === 'offboarding' ? 'offboarding' : 'onboarding';
7574|        if (!in_array($productSlug, ['onboarding', 'offboarding'], true)) {
7577|        $productLabel = $productSlug === 'offboarding' ? 'offboarding' : 'onboarding';
7631|        return $productSlug === 'offboarding'
7690|            'dateReferenceId' => 'Qual data de referência será usada para a validade ' . $context . '? Opções: 1 - Data de início do contrato, 2 - Data de início do onboarding/offboarding, 3 - Data de início da etapa. Informe o ID da opção ou o nome.',
7766|            'offboarding' => (array) ($instanceOptions['existing_offboardings'] ?? []),
7821|        if ($productSlug === 'offboarding') {
7822|            if ($this->isVariableOffboardingInstance($state)) {
7823|                $hint = empty($names) ? '' : ' Encontrei offboardings disponíveis: ' . implode(', ', $names) . '.';
7825|                return 'Para a instância, você quer criar um Offboarding novo e configurar as etapas agora, ou selecionar um Offboarding existente?'
7827|                    . ' Em template variável não aplico filtro de compatibilidade; posso usar qualquer offboarding disponível. Pode dizer "criar novo", "usar existente" ou já informar o nome/id do offboarding.';
7830|            $hint = empty($names) ? '' : ' Encontrei offboardings compatíveis com este template: ' . implode(', ', $names) . '.';
7832|            return 'Para a instância, você quer criar um Offboarding novo com base neste fluxo ou selecionar um Offboarding existente compatível?'
7834|                . ' Para reaproveitar, ele precisa bater em número de etapas e modelo de atividade. Pode dizer "criar novo", "usar existente" ou já informar o nome/id do offboarding.';
7875|    private function isVariableOffboardingInstance(array $state): bool
7877|        return $this->isVariableOnboardingLikeInstance($state, 'offboarding');
7942|            if (in_array($slug, ['onboarding', 'offboarding'], true)) {
7943|                $parts[] = $this->buildOnboardingInstanceSummary($fields, $slug === 'offboarding' ? 'Offboarding' : 'Onboarding');
8423|            'offboarding' => 'offboarding',
8446|            'offboarding' => 'Offboarding',

File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowDomainCatalog.php
Match lines: 4
61|        'offboarding' => ['options' => ['fixo', 'variavel'], 'default' => 'fixo'],
100|     *   "Fluxo de Saída"     → saida          → offboarding
111|            'offboarding',
324|                'offboarding',

File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowDraftExportSyncContract.php
Match lines: 1
53|            'offboarding',

File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowDraftNavigationInference.php
Match lines: 1
110|            return 'offboarding';

File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowInstanceApplierService.php
Match lines: 4
18| *  - POST /api/workflow/template/{id}/create-offboarding
113|        if ($route === 'create-onboarding' || $route === 'create-offboarding') {
260|                    'excludeMembersInOffboardingFlow' => (bool) ($fields['excludeMembersInOffboardingFlow'] ?? true),
301|            case 'offboarding':

File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowInstanceFieldCatalog.php
Match lines: 12
15|        'offboarding',
33|     * createOffboardingFromTemplate, createProcessoSeletivoCompleto and the
223|            'offboarding' => [
224|                'label' => 'Offboarding',
225|                'instance_label' => 'Offboarding',
229|                'route' => 'create-offboarding',
231|                    ['key' => 'name', 'label' => 'Nome do offboarding', 'type' => 'string', 'required' => true, 'only_when_mode' => 'new'],
234|                    ['key' => 'categoryId', 'label' => 'Categoria do offboarding', 'type' => 'int', 'required' => true, 'options_source' => 'offboarding_categories', 'only_when_mode' => 'new'],
237|                    ['key' => 'etapas', 'label' => 'Etapas do offboarding', 'type' => 'object_list', 'required' => false, 'only_when_mode' => 'new'],
238|                    ['key' => 'customSteps', 'label' => 'Etapas customizadas do offboarding', 'type' => 'object_list', 'required' => false, 'only_when_mode' => 'new'],
239|                    ['key' => 'existingProcessId', 'label' => 'Offboarding existente', 'type' => 'int', 'required' => true, 'options_source' => 'existing_offboardings', 'only_when_mode' => 'existing'],
442|            'offboarding' => 'Offboarding',

File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowInstancePlannerService.php
Match lines: 3
242|            case 'offboarding':
453|                $typeId = $slug === 'offboarding'
454|                    ? (method_exists($activity, 'getOffboardingActivityTypeId') ? $activity->getOffboardingActivityTypeId() : null)

File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowIntentHeuristicService.php
Match lines: 1
194|        $processDomains = ['processo seletivo', 'recrutamento', 'onboarding', 'offboarding'];

File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowOpenRouteResolver.php
Match lines: 1
31|        'offboarding' => 'fluxo-de-saida',

File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowPlanApplierService.php
Match lines: 3
366|                $activity->setOffboardingActivityTypeId($sourceActivity->getOffboardingActivityTypeId());
593|            description: 'Ciclo inicial encerrado. Demanda de aprovação de offboarding enviada ao Centro de Comunicação.',
713|            'saida' => ['offboarding'],

File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowProductCatalog.php
Match lines: 3
80|        'offboarding' => [
81|            'product_key' => 'offboarding',
88|                'bloqueio de acessos', 'entrevista de saída', 'entrevista de saida', 'offboarding',

File: src/Service/Ata/AtaProcessorService.php
Match lines: 100
20|use App\Entity\Offboarding;
21|use App\Entity\OffboardingCategory;
22|use App\Entity\OffboardingMember;
23|use App\Entity\OffboardingMemberStatus;
488|            'offboarding'   => $isQuickPhase && empty($ataData['_detailed_offboarding']) 
489|                                || (!empty($ataData['_detailed_offboarding']) && empty($ataData['offboarding_membros'])),
490|            'offboarding_request' => $isQuickPhase && empty($ataData['_detailed_offboarding_request']),
592|        } elseif ($product === 'offboarding') {
593|            // ★ Mesclar dados de offboarding
594|            if (isset($detailed['offboarding'])) {
595|                $ataData['offboarding'] = $detailed['offboarding'];
598|                $ataData['offboarding_membros'] = $detailed['membros'];
600|            $ataData['_detailed_offboarding'] = true;
602|        } elseif ($product === 'offboarding_request') {
603|            if (isset($detailed['offboarding_request'])) {
604|                $ataData['offboarding_request'] = $detailed['offboarding_request'];
606|            $ataData['_detailed_offboarding_request'] = true;
1941|        $sugereCriarOffboarding = !empty($acoes['criar_offboarding']);
2040|        // ★ "Criar Offboarding" — SEM contagem (detalhes na Fase 2)
2041|        if ($sugereCriarOffboarding && $this->canCreateOffboarding($user, $company)) {
2043|                'id'          => 'criar_offboarding_ata',
2044|                'text'        => '🚪 Criar Offboarding',
2045|                'action'      => 'create_offboarding',
2056|                'action'      => 'request_offboarding',
3962|    // PERMISSÕES: Offboarding (ATA)
3964|    private function canCreateOffboarding(User $user, Company $company): bool
3966|        $permission = $this->getOffboardingPermissionTag($user, $company);
3972|    private function getOffboardingPermissionTag(User $user, Company $company): array
3990|            ->findOneBy(['slug' => 'offboarding']);
4020|    // OFFBOARDING: Preview, Edição e Criação
4024|     * Exibe preview de offboarding extraído da ata
4026|    public function previewOffboardingFromAta(int $ataId, User $user): array
4038|        if (!$this->canCreateOffboarding($user, $company)) {
4039|            return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Sem permissão para criar offboarding.'];
4042|        // ★ Fase 2: garantir análise detalhada de offboarding
4043|        $ataData = $this->ensureDetailedAnalysis($ata, 'offboarding', $user);
4048|        $offboarding = $ataData['offboarding'] ?? null;
4049|        $membros = $ataData['offboarding_membros'] ?? [];
4052|        $this->logger->info('[AtaProcessor] previewOffboarding', [
4054|            'offboarding' => $offboarding,
4056|            'offboarding_empty' => empty($offboarding),
4069|        // Se offboarding/membros vazios, tentar criar preview com fallback semântico
4070|        if (empty($offboarding) || empty($membros)) {
4079|            if (!$nomeFallback && $this->isMostRecentOffboardingReference($originalText)) {
4088|                    'error' => 'Não foi possível extrair dados de offboarding da ata. [sem participantes detectados]'
4092|            // Criar offboarding e membro básicos usando fallback
4102|            $offboarding = [
4129|        $categoriaId = $categoriaMap[$offboarding['categoria'] ?? 'Saída'] ?? 1;
4172|            'offboarding' => [
4173|                'nome_modelo' => $offboarding['nome_modelo'] ?? 'Offboarding',
4174|                'descricao' => $offboarding['descricao'] ?? '',
4176|                'categoria_nome' => $offboarding['categoria'] ?? 'Saída',
4177|                'is_active' => $offboarding['is_active'] ?? true,
4178|                'block_access_to_platform' => $offboarding['block_access_to_platform'] ?? false,
4186|     * Edita o preview de offboarding usando IA
4188|    public function editOffboardingPreview(int $ataId, string $instruction, User $user): array
4200|        if (!$this->canCreateOffboarding($user, $company)) {
4201|            return ['success' => false, 'message' => 'Sem permissão para editar offboarding.'];
4205|        $ataData = $this->ensureDetailedAnalysis($ata, 'offboarding', $user);
4211|        $currentOffboarding = $ataData['offboarding'] ?? [];
4212|        $currentMembros = $ataData['offboarding_membros'] ?? [];
4216|            $edited = $this->router->editOffboarding($instruction, $currentOffboarding, $currentMembros);
4219|                $this->logger->warning('[AtaProcessor] Falha ao parsear edição de offboarding');
4224|            $ataData['offboarding'] = $edited['offboarding'] ?? $currentOffboarding;
4225|            $ataData['offboarding_membros'] = $edited['membros'] ?? $currentMembros;
4233|            $this->logger->error('[AtaProcessor] Erro ao editar offboarding', [
4241|     * Cria offboarding e offboarding_members no banco
4243|    public function createOffboardingFromAta(int $ataId, User $user, Company $company): array
4250|        if (!$this->canCreateOffboarding($user, $company)) {
4251|            return ['success' => false, 'message' => 'Sem permissão para criar offboarding.'];
4255|        $ataData = $this->ensureDetailedAnalysis($ata, 'offboarding', $user);
4260|        $offboardingData = $ataData['offboarding'] ?? null;
4261|        $membrosData = $ataData['offboarding_membros'] ?? [];
4264|            $result = $this->executeCreateOffboarding($offboardingData, $membrosData, $user, $company);
4268|                'offboarding_created' => $result,
4275|            $this->logger->error('[AtaProcessor] Erro ao criar offboarding', [
4278|            return ['success' => false, 'message' => 'Erro ao criar offboarding: ' . $e->getMessage()];
4283|     * Executa a criação de Offboarding + OffboardingMembers no banco
4285|    private function executeCreateOffboarding(
4286|        ?array $offboardingData,
4291|        if (empty($offboardingData) || empty($membrosData)) {
4294|                'message' => 'Dados de offboarding incompletos.'
4304|            // 1. Buscar ou criar Offboarding (template/modelo)
4305|            $nomeModelo = $offboardingData['nome_modelo'] ?? 'Offboarding';
4307|            // Buscar offboarding existente pelo nome
4308|            $offboarding = $this->entityManager->getRepository(Offboarding::class)
4315|            if (!$offboarding) {
4316|                $offboarding = new Offboarding();
4317|                $offboarding->setCompany($company);
4318|                $offboarding->setName($nomeModelo);
4322|                $categoriaNome = $offboardingData['categoria'] ?? 'Saída';
4326|                $category = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingCategory::class)
4330|                    throw new \Exception("Categoria de offboarding não encontrada (ID: {$categoriaId})");
4333|                $offboarding->setCategory($category);
4334|                $offboarding->setDescription($offboardingData['descricao'] ?? '');
4335|                $offboarding->setIsActive($offboardingData['is_active'] ?? true);
4336|                $offboarding->setBlockAccessToPlatform($offboardingData['block_access_to_platform'] ?? false);
4338|                $this->entityManager->persist($offboarding);
4342|            // 2. Criar OffboardingMembers
4368|                // Verificar se já existe offboarding para este colaborador

File: src/Service/Ata/AtaRouterService.php
Match lines: 74
143|            'criar_offboarding' => false,
198|            'offboarding' => $this->buildOffboardingAnalysisPrompt($text, $company),
199|            'offboarding_request' => $this->buildOffboardingRequestAnalysisPrompt($text),
227|            // ★ LOG para debug de offboarding
228|            if ($product === 'offboarding') {
229|                $this->logger->info('[AtaRouter] Fase 2 Offboarding: resposta parseada', [
231|                    'offboarding' => $parsed['offboarding'] ?? null,
238|                    $this->logger->warning('[AtaRouter] Fase 2 Offboarding: DeepSeek retornou erro', [
247|                    $this->logger->warning('[AtaRouter] Fase 2 Offboarding: membros vazio, aplicando fallback');
252|                    if (!$nomeTexto && $this->isMostRecentOffboardingReference($text)) {
255|                            $this->logger->info('[AtaRouter] Fallback offboarding: usando membro mais recente', [
312|                        if (empty($parsed['offboarding']) || !is_array($parsed['offboarding'])) {
313|                            $parsed['offboarding'] = [
538|    "criar_offboarding": false,
589|12. **acoes_sugeridas.criar_offboarding: true OBRIGATÓRIO se:**
591|   - Palavras-chave: "demitir", "demissão", "desligamento", "offboarding", "saída", "desligar"
594|   - **IMPORTANTE**: Sempre que mencionar demissão ou saída de funcionário → criar_offboarding=true
599|   - **IMPORTANTE**: se solicitar_desligamento=true, criar_offboarding=false
734|                'criar_offboarding'      => !empty($acoes['criar_offboarding']),
2633|    private function isMostRecentOffboardingReference(string $text): bool
2667|            $this->logger->warning('[AtaRouter] Falha ao resolver membro mais recente para offboarding', [
3351|     * Prompt de análise detalhada (Fase 2) para Offboarding
3353|    private function buildOffboardingAnalysisPrompt(string $text, Company $company): string
3380|        // Buscar catálogo de modelos/offboardings já existentes (obrigatório para robustez semântica)
3381|        $offboardings = $this->entityManager
3382|            ->getRepository(\App\Entity\Offboarding::class)
3385|        $offboardingFields = $this->fieldExtractorService->getOffboardingFields($offboardings);
3386|        $offboardingCatalog = [];
3387|        foreach ($offboardingFields as $offboardingField) {
3388|            $offboardingCatalog[] = [
3389|                'id' => (int) ($offboardingField['id'] ?? 0),
3390|                'name' => (string) ($offboardingField['name'] ?? ''),
3391|                'category' => (string) ($offboardingField['category']['name'] ?? 'Saída'),
3392|                'is_active' => (bool) ($offboardingField['isActive'] ?? true),
3395|        $offboardingsDisponiveis = !empty($offboardingCatalog)
3396|            ? json_encode($offboardingCatalog, JSON_PRETTY_PRINT | JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE)
3400|Analise o texto da reunião e extraia dados DETALHADOS para criar OFFBOARDING (desligamento de funcionário).
3407|**CATÁLOGO REAL DE MODELOS/OFFBOARDINGS JÁ CADASTRADOS:**
3408|{$offboardingsDisponiveis}
3422|- Categoria do offboarding: "Saída" (padrão - desligamentos), "Treinamento" (período de treinamento), "Estágio" (fim de estágio)
3423|- Nome do modelo/template de offboarding (se mencionado) OU descrição do processo
3439|   {"offboarding": null, "membros": [], "erro": "Colaborador '[NOME]' não encontrado na lista de membros"}
3454|12. Frases como "tirar X da equipe", "remover X da equipe" devem ser interpretadas como OFFBOARDING (categoria "Saída", salvo indicação contrária)
3458|  "offboarding": {
3459|    "nome_modelo": "Nome do modelo/template de offboarding",
3460|    "descricao": "Descrição do processo de offboarding",
3485|  "offboarding": {
3506|  "offboarding": null,
3512|- Se não houver dados claros de offboarding, retornar: {"offboarding": null, "membros": []}
3513|- ⚠️ CRÍTICO: O array "membros" SEMPRE deve ter pelo menos 1 item se houver offboarding
3514|- Colaborador OBRIGATÓRIO (sem colaborador = sem offboarding)
3515|- ⚠️ Se o nome mencionado NÃO estiver na lista de membros, retorne: {"offboarding": null, "membros": [], "erro": "Colaborador '[nome]' não encontrado"}
3527|    private function buildOffboardingRequestAnalysisPrompt(string $text): string
3541|  "offboarding_request": {
4273|     * Edita offboarding baseado em instrução do usuário
4275|    public function editOffboarding(string $instruction, array $currentOffboarding, array $currentMembros): array
4277|        $prompt = $this->buildEditOffboardingPrompt($instruction, $currentOffboarding, $currentMembros);
4288|        if (!$parsed || !isset($parsed['offboarding'])) {
4289|            $this->logger->warning('[AtaRouter] Falha ao parsear edição de offboarding', [
4292|            return ['offboarding' => $currentOffboarding, 'membros' => $currentMembros];
4301|    public function editOffboardingRequest(string $instruction, array $currentData): array
4303|        $prompt = $this->buildEditOffboardingRequestPrompt($instruction, $currentData);
4314|        if (!$parsed || !isset($parsed['offboarding_request'])) {
4318|            return ['offboarding_request' => $currentData];
4550|     * Constrói prompt para editar offboarding
4552|    private function buildEditOffboardingPrompt(string $instruction, array $currentOffboarding, array $currentMembros): string
4554|        $offboardingJson = json_encode($currentOffboarding, JSON_PRETTY_PRINT | JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE);
4558|Você é um assistente que edita dados de offboarding (desligamento de funcionários).
4562|Offboarding (Modelo):
4563|{$offboardingJson}
4576|2. OFFBOARDING: 
4609|  "offboarding": {
4634|    private function buildEditOffboardingRequestPrompt(string $instruction, array $currentData): string
4657|  "offboarding_request": {

File: src/Service/Ata/Edit/AtaEditResponseFactory.php
Match lines: 8
13|    private AtaOffboardingEditService $offboardingEditService;
14|    private AtaOffboardingRequestEditService $offboardingRequestEditService;
27|        AtaOffboardingEditService $offboardingEditService,
28|        AtaOffboardingRequestEditService $offboardingRequestEditService,
40|        $this->offboardingEditService = $offboardingEditService;
41|        $this->offboardingRequestEditService = $offboardingRequestEditService;
57|            'offboarding' => $this->offboardingEditService->edit($ataId, $payload['instruction'] ?? '', $user),
58|            'offboarding_request' => $this->offboardingRequestEditService->edit($ataId, $payload['instruction'] ?? '', $user),

File: src/Service/Ata/Edit/AtaOffboardingEditService.php
Match lines: 2
8|class AtaOffboardingEditService
24|        return $this->ataProcessor->editOffboardingPreview($ataId, $instruction, $user);

File: src/Service/Ata/Edit/AtaOffboardingRequestEditService.php
Match lines: 2
8|class AtaOffboardingRequestEditService
24|        return $this->ataProcessor->editOffboardingRequestPreview($ataId, $instruction, $user);

File: src/Service/Ata/Preview/AtaOffboardingPreviewService.php
Match lines: 26
8|class AtaOffboardingPreviewService
19|        $preview = $this->ataProcessor->previewOffboardingFromAta($ataId, $user);
21|            return ['success' => false, 'error' => $preview['message'] ?? $preview['error'] ?? 'Erro ao carregar dados de offboarding.'];
24|        $offboarding = $preview['offboarding'] ?? [];
30|        $lines[] = '🚪 **Offboarding:** ' . ($offboarding['nome_modelo'] ?? 'Offboarding');
31|        if (!empty($offboarding['categoria_nome'])) {
32|            $lines[] = '🏷️ **Categoria:** ' . $offboarding['categoria_nome'];
34|        if (!empty($offboarding['descricao'])) {
35|            $lines[] = '📝 **Descrição:** ' . $offboarding['descricao'];
37|        if (array_key_exists('is_active', $offboarding)) {
38|            $lines[] = '✅ **Status:** ' . ($offboarding['is_active'] ? 'Ativo' : 'Inativo');
40|        if (array_key_exists('block_access_to_platform', $offboarding)) {
41|            $lines[] = '🔒 **Bloquear Acesso:** ' . ($offboarding['block_access_to_platform'] ? 'Sim' : 'Não');
55|            'title' => 'Resumo do Offboarding',
58|                ['action' => 'create_offboarding', 'label' => 'Criar Offboarding', 'style' => 'primary', 'disabled' => $hasErros],
64|                'handler' => 'offboarding',
70|                'type' => 'offboarding',
74|            'offboarding_preview' => $this->buildOffboardingPreviewPayload($preview),
78|    private function buildOffboardingPreviewPayload(array $preview): array
80|        $offboarding = $preview['offboarding'] ?? [];
94|            'offboarding' => [
95|                'nome_modelo' => (string) ($offboarding['nome_modelo'] ?? 'Offboarding'),
96|                'descricao' => (string) ($offboarding['descricao'] ?? ''),
97|                'categoria_nome' => (string) ($offboarding['categoria_nome'] ?? 'Saída'),
98|                'is_active' => (bool) ($offboarding['is_active'] ?? true),
99|                'block_access_to_platform' => (bool) ($offboarding['block_access_to_platform'] ?? false),

File: src/Service/Ata/Preview/AtaOffboardingRequestPreviewService.php
Match lines: 6
8|class AtaOffboardingRequestPreviewService
19|        $preview = $this->ataProcessor->previewOffboardingRequestFromAta($ataId, $user);
24|        $data = $preview['offboarding_request'] ?? [];
48|                ['action' => 'request_offboarding', 'label' => 'Solicitar Desligamento', 'style' => 'primary', 'disabled' => $hasErros],
54|                'handler' => 'offboarding_request',
60|                'type' => 'offboarding_request',

File: src/Service/Ata/Preview/AtaPreviewResponseFactory.php
Match lines: 10
20|    private AtaOffboardingPreviewService $offboardingPreviewService;
21|    private AtaOffboardingRequestPreviewService $offboardingRequestPreviewService;
40|        AtaOffboardingPreviewService $offboardingPreviewService,
41|        AtaOffboardingRequestPreviewService $offboardingRequestPreviewService,
59|        $this->offboardingPreviewService = $offboardingPreviewService;
60|        $this->offboardingRequestPreviewService = $offboardingRequestPreviewService;
106|            'create_offboarding'
107|                => $this->offboardingPreviewService->buildPreviewResponse($ataId, $user),
109|            'request_offboarding'
110|                => $this->offboardingRequestPreviewService->buildPreviewResponse($ataId, $user),

File: src/Service/Ata/Submit/AtaOffboardingRequestSubmitService.php
Match lines: 2
11|class AtaOffboardingRequestSubmitService
29|        $result = $this->ataProcessor->createOffboardingRequestFromAta($ataId, $user, $user->getCompany());

File: src/Service/Ata/Submit/AtaOffboardingSubmitService.php
Match lines: 7
11|class AtaOffboardingSubmitService
29|        $result = $this->ataProcessor->createOffboardingFromAta($ataId, $user, $user->getCompany());
34|                'error'   => $result['message'] ?? 'Erro ao criar offboarding',
41|                $chatParts = [$result['message'] ?? '✅ Offboarding criado com sucesso!'];
65|            'message'         => $result['message'] ?? 'Offboarding criado com sucesso!',
68|            'offboarding_id'  => $result['offboarding_id'] ?? null,
69|            'offboarding_name' => $result['offboarding_name'] ?? null,

File: src/Service/Ata/Submit/AtaSubmitResponseFactory.php
Match lines: 8
15|    private AtaOffboardingSubmitService $offboardingSubmitService;
16|    private AtaOffboardingRequestSubmitService $offboardingRequestSubmitService;
35|        AtaOffboardingSubmitService $offboardingSubmitService,
36|        AtaOffboardingRequestSubmitService $offboardingRequestSubmitService,
54|        $this->offboardingSubmitService = $offboardingSubmitService;
55|        $this->offboardingRequestSubmitService = $offboardingRequestSubmitService;
82|            'create_offboarding' => $this->offboardingSubmitService->submit($ataId, $user, $conversationId),
83|            'request_offboarding' => $this->offboardingRequestSubmitService->submit($ataId, $user, $conversationId),

File: src/Service/AutomationConfigService.php
Match lines: 1
47|     * @param string $productSlug Slug do produto (processo-seletivo, onboarding, offboarding)

File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 100
58|use App\Service\OffboardingToRecruitmentService;
92|    private ?OffboardingToRecruitmentService $offboardingToRecruitment;
123|        ?OffboardingToRecruitmentService $offboardingToRecruitment = null,
139|        $this->offboardingToRecruitment = $offboardingToRecruitment;
504|            // ✅ Criar Processo Seletivo a partir de offboarding concluído
508|            // ✅ Visibilidade e Acesso - Offboarding
509|            'delay_offboarding_visibility' => $this->executeDelayOffboardingVisibility($config, $member, $context),
2222|            'assign_offboarding_flow' => 'Atribuir a fluxo de offboarding',
3821|        if (in_array($requestType, ['assign_onboarding_flow', 'assign_offboarding_flow', 'assign_other_bpmn_flow'], true)) {
5080|            if ($requestType === 'assign_offboarding_flow' && $existing->getCurrentStage()) {
5081|                $this->createOffboardingMemberForCrossProduct($existing, $existing->getCurrentStage());
5124|        if ($requestType === 'assign_offboarding_flow') {
5125|            $this->createOffboardingMemberForCrossProduct($newMember, $targetStage);
5149|            'assign_offboarding_flow' => 'offboarding',
5379|            'on_offboarding_complete', 'on_onboarding_complete', 'on_assessment_complete',
5609|     * Avalia se a data de desligamento chegou (específico para offboarding)
5724|            'assign_offboarding_flow' => 'Atribuir a fluxo de offboarding',
6520|            // Para offboarding, buscar dados específicos
6521|            if ($member->getSourceType() === 'offboarding' && $member->getSourceId()) {
6522|                $offboarding = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\Offboarding::class)->find($member->getSourceId());
6523|                if ($offboarding) {
6524|                    $values['title'] = $values['title'] ?: $offboarding->getName();
6525|                    $values['offboarding_name'] = $offboarding->getName();
6526|                    $values['processName'] = $values['processName'] ?: $offboarding->getName();
6527|                    $values['process_name'] = $values['process_name'] ?: $offboarding->getName();
6529|                    // Buscar offboarding_member para pegar step atual
6540|                            $offboardingMember = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\OffboardingMember::class)
6541|                                ->findOneBy(['offboarding' => $offboarding, 'companyMember' => $companyMember]);
6543|                            if ($offboardingMember && $offboardingMember->getCurrentStep()) {
6545|                                $stepName = $context['_original_offboarding_step_name'] ?? $offboardingMember->getCurrentStep()->getName();
6555|                        $values['message'] = "Notificação referente à etapa {$stageName} do offboarding {$offboarding->getName()}.";
6558|                    // URL para acessar o offboarding
6560|                    $values['link'] = $baseUrl . '/offboarding';
6732|        if ($sourceType === 'offboarding' && $member->getSourceId()) {
6733|            $offboarding = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\Offboarding::class)->find($member->getSourceId());
6734|            if ($offboarding) {
6735|                $name = trim((string) $offboarding->getName());
7665|        // Preservar offboardingMemberId para manter link FIM→OM em multiflow
7666|        if (isset($existingProgress['offboardingMemberId'])) {
7667|            $activitiesProgress['offboardingMemberId'] = $existingProgress['offboardingMemberId'];
8115|     * Create an OffboardingMember when a FlowInstanceMember is assigned cross-product to Offboarding.
8116|     * This ensures the member appears in legacy Offboarding system views.
8118|    private function createOffboardingMemberForCrossProduct(FlowInstanceMember $member, FlowStage $targetStage): void
8123|                error_log('[MOVE_TO_STAGE] No FlowInstance found for member ' . $member->getId() . ' (offboarding)');
8127|            // 1. Find Offboarding ID from FlowInstance config/metadata.
8129|            $offboardingId = $config['offboardingId'] ?? null;
8131|            if (!$offboardingId) {
8134|                    if (($product['type'] ?? '') === 'offboarding') {
8135|                        $offboardingId = $product['id'] ?? null;
8141|            if (!$offboardingId) {
8142|                error_log('[MOVE_TO_STAGE] Could not find offboardingId in FlowInstance config/metadata');
8146|            // 2. Find Offboarding entity.
8147|            $offboarding = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\Offboarding::class)->find($offboardingId);
8148|            if (!$offboarding) {
8149|                error_log('[MOVE_TO_STAGE] Offboarding not found: ' . $offboardingId);
8162|                error_log('[MOVE_TO_STAGE] CompanyMembers not found for user ' . ($user?->getId() ?? 'NULL') . ' (offboarding)');
8167|            $existingMember = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\OffboardingMember::class)->findOneBy([
8168|                'offboarding' => $offboarding,
8172|                error_log('[MOVE_TO_STAGE] OffboardingMember already exists: ' . $existingMember->getId());
8177|            $statusRepo = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\OffboardingMemberStatus::class);
8189|                error_log('[MOVE_TO_STAGE] OffboardingMemberStatus not found');
8193|            // 6. Resolve first step/activity from offboarding definition.
8194|            $stepIds = $offboarding->getSteps() ?? [];
8197|                $firstStep = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\OffboardingStep::class)->find($stepIds[0]);
8200|                $steps = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\OffboardingStep::class)->findBy(
8201|                    ['offboarding' => $offboarding],
8211|                    $firstActivity = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\OffboardingActivity::class)->find($activityIds[0]);
8218|                $allSteps = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\OffboardingStep::class)->findBy(
8219|                    ['offboarding' => $offboarding],
8227|                $stepEntity = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\OffboardingStep::class)->find($sId);
8252|            // 8. Create OffboardingMember.
8253|            $offboardingMember = new \App\Entity\OffboardingMember();
8254|            $offboardingMember->setCompany($company);
8255|            $offboardingMember->setOffboarding($offboarding);
8256|            $offboardingMember->setCompanyMember($companyMember);
8257|            $offboardingMember->setStatus($status);
8258|            $offboardingMember->setRequestedAt(new \DateTime());
8259|            $offboardingMember->setDismissalDate(new \DateTime());
8260|            $offboardingMember->setRequestedByAdmin(true);
8261|            $offboardingMember->setVisibleToCollaborator(true);
8262|            $offboardingMember->setVisibleAt(new \DateTime());
8263|            $offboardingMember->setActivitiesInCurrentStep(0);
8264|            $offboardingMember->setCompletedActivities(0);
8265|            $offboardingMember->setHasStartedOffboarding(true);
8266|            $offboardingMember->setHasFinishedOffboarding(false);
8267|            $offboardingMember->setHasStartedStep(true);
8268|            $offboardingMember->setHasFinishedStep(false);
8269|            $offboardingMember->setStepReleased(true);
8270|            $offboardingMember->setActivityReleased(false);
8271|            $offboardingMember->setStepsActivities($stepsActivities);
8274|                $offboardingMember->setCurrentStep($firstStep);
8277|                $offboardingMember->setCurrentActivity($firstActivity);
8282|                $offboardingMember->setProfile($profile);
8285|            $this->entityManager->persist($offboardingMember);
8287|            error_log('[MOVE_TO_STAGE] ✅ Created OffboardingMember for user ' . ($user?->getId() ?? 'NULL') .
8288|                ' in Offboarding ' . $offboardingId . ' (member ID will be assigned on flush)');
8290|            error_log('[MOVE_TO_STAGE] ❌ Error creating OffboardingMember: ' . $e->getMessage());
8925|                    if (in_array($activity->getActivityType(), ['selection_process', 'onboarding_variable', 'offboarding_variable'])) {
8940|     * Para flows VARIÁVEIS de offboarding/onboarding:
8941|     * - Avança a etapa do produto (OffboardingStep/OnboardingStep)

File: src/Service/Chat/ChatDataSourceService.php
Match lines: 30
21|use App\Entity\OffboardingCategory;
22|use App\Entity\OffboardingTypeActivity;
23|use App\Entity\OffboardingSignatureFileType;
24|use App\Entity\Offboarding;
25|use App\Entity\OffboardingMember;
346|            // Offboarding
347|            case 'offboarding_categories':
348|                return $this->getOffboardingCategories();
349|            case 'offboarding_type_activity':
350|                return $this->getOffboardingTypeActivity();
351|            case 'offboarding_signature_file_type':
352|                return $this->getOffboardingSignatureFileType();
353|            case 'offboarding_templates':
354|                return $this->getOffboardingTemplates();
355|            case 'offboarding_requests':
356|                return $this->getOffboardingRequests();
3856|    private function getOffboardingCategories(): array
3858|        $categorias = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingCategory::class)->findAll();
3871|    private function getOffboardingTypeActivity(): array
3873|        $types = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingTypeActivity::class)->findAll();
3886|    private function getOffboardingSignatureFileType(): array
3898|            ->getRepository(OffboardingSignatureFileType::class)
3912|    private function getOffboardingTemplates(): array
3919|        $offboardings = $this->entityManager
3920|            ->getRepository(Offboarding::class)
3924|        foreach ($offboardings as $offboarding) {
3926|                'id' => $offboarding->getId(),
3927|                'nome' => $offboarding->getName() ?: ('Offboarding #' . $offboarding->getId())
3934|    private function getOffboardingRequests(): array
3942|            ->getRepository(OffboardingMember::class)

File: src/Service/ChatMarkerMemberService.php
Match lines: 23
190|        $offboardingData = $this->getOffboardingData($memberId, $companyId);
201|             $offboardingData, 
1424|     * Busca dados de offboarding (fluxo de desligamento) do membro
1426|    private function getOffboardingData(int $memberId, int $companyId): array
1437|                FROM offboarding_members om
1438|                INNER JOIN offboarding o ON o.id = om.offboarding_id
1439|                INNER JOIN offboarding_member_status oms ON oms.id = om.status_id
1450|            $offboardings = $result->fetchAllAssociative(); 
1453|                'total' => count($offboardings),
1454|                'offboardings' => $offboardings,
1455|                'latest' => $offboardings[0] ?? null
1459|            $this->logger->error('[ChatMarkerMemberService] Erro ao buscar offboarding', [
1463|            return ['total' => 0, 'offboardings' => [], 'latest' => null];
1874|        array $offboardingData, 
1930|        // 2) Fluxo de Offboarding
1931|        $response .= "## 📋 Fluxo de Offboarding\n\n"; 
1932|        if ($offboardingData['total'] > 0) {
1933|            $response .= "**Total de fluxos:** {$offboardingData['total']}\n\n";
1935|            if ($offboardingData['latest']) {
1936|                $latest = $offboardingData['latest'];
1949|                if ($offboardingData['total'] > 1) {
1950|                    $response .= "*Existem mais " . ($offboardingData['total'] - 1) . " fluxo(s) de offboarding associados.*\n\n";
1954|            $response .= "Nenhum fluxo de offboarding atribuído.\n\n";

File: src/Service/ChatSuggestionService.php
Match lines: 6
73|    private $offboardingService;
117|        'Offboarding' => 'offboarding',
166|        \App\Service\Tools\OffboardingService $offboardingService,
219|        $this->offboardingService = $offboardingService;
282|            'offboarding' => $this->offboardingService,
329|            $this->offboardingService,

File: src/Service/CicloInicialService.php
Match lines: 3
248|            description: 'Ciclo inicial encerrado. Demanda de aprovação de offboarding enviada ao Centro de Comunicação.',
428|     *  - 'encerramento'       : encerra o ciclo e aciona fluxo de offboarding
603|            'description' => 'Encerrar o contrato do colaborador. Ativa fluxo de offboarding.',

File: src/Service/CicloInicialStageService.php
Match lines: 4
133|     * - Prepara dados para solicitação de aprovação de offboarding
136|     * de offboarding; se aprovado, iniciar FlowInstance de offboarding.
145|        // Expansão futura: $this->centroDeComService->createOffboardingApprovalDemanda($member);
147|        // a atribuição/início real do fluxo de offboarding (ex.: assign_offboarding_flow), para

File: src/Service/CompanyAppVisibilityService.php
Match lines: 2
39|        'offboarding' => 'offboarding',
181|        'offboarding' => 'offboarding',

File: src/Service/Effectiveness/Alert/NeuralAlertActionSubjectScopeResolver.php
Match lines: 1
403|        'RISK_INDICATOR_CRITICAL_OFFBOARDING_LIABILITY' => 'passivo-operacional',

File: src/Service/Effectiveness/EffectivenessDashboardActionComposer.php
Match lines: 1
2016|            'offboarding_incomplete' => 'Offboarding incompleto',

File: src/Service/Effectiveness/Grc/GrcActionNormalizer.php
Match lines: 3
238|        if (preg_match('/^offboarding:\d+:member:\d+$/', $caseKey)) {
239|            return ['slug' => 'governance_offboarding_incomplete', 'label' => 'Offboarding incompleto'];
369|            'offboarding' => 'Offboarding',

File: src/Service/Effectiveness/Grc/GrcOriginConditionEvaluator.php
Match lines: 4
28| *   - offboarding:{offboardingMemberId}:member:{memberId}
48| *   - onboarding/offboarding: there is no dated snapshot table for member
104|        if (preg_match('/^offboarding:(\d+):member:(\d+)$/', $caseKey)) {
105|            // Offboarding has no dated snapshot table — not verifiable in v1.

File: src/Service/FeatureCatalogService.php
Match lines: 3
17|        'offboarding' => 'offboarding',
78|        'offboarding' => 'icon-i-offboarding',
148|        'offboarding' => 'icon-i-offboarding',

File: src/Service/FieldExtractorService.php
Match lines: 100
29|use App\Entity\Offboarding;
30|use App\Entity\OffboardingCategory;
31|use App\Entity\OffboardingTypeActivity;
32|use App\Entity\OffboardingSignatureFileType;
33|use App\Entity\OffboardingActivity;
34|use App\Entity\OffboardingStep;
1034|    public function getOffboardingCategoryField(OffboardingCategory $category): array
1042|    public function getOffboardingCategoryFields(array $categories): array
1046|            $result[] = $this->getOffboardingCategoryField($category);
1051|    public function getOffboardingField(Offboarding $offboarding): array
1054|            'id'                    => $offboarding->getId(),
1055|            'company'               => $this->getCompanyFields($offboarding->getCompany()),
1056|            'name'                  => $offboarding->getName(),
1057|            'isActive'              => $offboarding->getIsActive(),
1059|                'id'   => $offboarding->getCategory()->getId(),
1060|                'name' => $offboarding->getCategory()->getName(),
1062|            'blockAccessToPlatform' => $offboarding->getBlockAccessToPlatform(),
1063|            'description'           => $offboarding->getDescription(),
1064|            'creationDateTime'      => $offboarding->getCreationDateTime()->format('Y-m-d H:i:s'),
1065|            'steps'                 => $offboarding->getSteps() ?? [],
1069|    public function getOffboardingFields(array $offboardings): array
1072|        foreach ($offboardings as $off) {
1073|            $result[] = $this->getOffboardingField($off);
1078|    public function getOffboardingActivityField(OffboardingActivity $offboardingActivity): array
1081|            'id'                        => $offboardingActivity->getId(),
1082|            'company'                   => $this->getCompanyFields($offboardingActivity->getCompany()),
1083|            'offboardingTypeActivity'   => $this->getOffboardingTypeActivityField($offboardingActivity->getOffboardingTypeActivity()),
1084|            'active'                    => $offboardingActivity->isActive(),
1085|            'name'                      => $offboardingActivity->getName(),
1086|            'description'               => $offboardingActivity->getDescription(),
1087|            'title'                     => $offboardingActivity->getTitle(),
1088|            'text'                      => $offboardingActivity->getText(),
1089|            'footerText'                => $offboardingActivity->getFooterText(),
1090|            'image'                     => $offboardingActivity->getImage(),
1091|            'showTextWithImage'         => $offboardingActivity->getShowTextWithImage(),
1092|            'offboardingSignatureFiles' => $offboardingActivity->getOffboardingSignatureFiles(),
1093|            'daysCount'                 => $offboardingActivity->getDaysCount(),
1094|            'relativeDirection'         => $offboardingActivity->getRelativeDirection()
1095|                ? $this->getRelativeDirectionField($offboardingActivity->getRelativeDirection())
1097|            'dateReference'             => $offboardingActivity->getDateReference()
1098|                ? $this->getDateReferenceField($offboardingActivity->getDateReference())
1100|            'hasResponsible'            => $offboardingActivity->getHasResponsible(),
1101|            'responsible'               => $offboardingActivity->getResponsible()
1103|                    'id'   => $offboardingActivity->getResponsible()->getId(),
1104|                    'name' => $offboardingActivity->getResponsible()->getFullName(),
1107|            'notifyNearExpiration'      => $offboardingActivity->getNotifyNearExpiration(),
1108|            'daysBeforeExpirationNotify'=> $offboardingActivity->getDaysBeforeExpirationNotify(),
1109|            'creationDateTime'          => $offboardingActivity->getCreationDateTime()->format('Y-m-d H:i:s'),
1113|    public function getOffboardingActivityFields(array $offboardingActivities): array
1116|        foreach ($offboardingActivities as $oa) {
1117|            $result[] = $this->getOffboardingActivityField($oa);
1122|    public function getOffboardingTypeActivityField(OffboardingTypeActivity $offboardingType): array
1125|            'id'       => $offboardingType->getId(),
1126|            'name'     => $offboardingType->getName(),
1127|            'icon'     => $offboardingType->getIcon(),
1128|            'isActive' => $offboardingType->getIsActive(),
1132|    public function getOffboardingTypeActivityFields(array $offboardingTypes): array
1136|        foreach ($offboardingTypes as $offboardingType) {
1137|            $result[] = $this->getOffboardingTypeActivityField($offboardingType);
1143|    public function getOffboardingSignatureFileTypeField(OffboardingSignatureFileType $offboardingSignature): array
1146|            'id'           => $offboardingSignature->getId(),
1147|            'companyId'    => $offboardingSignature->getCompanyId(),
1148|            'documentLink' => $offboardingSignature->getDocumentLink(),
1149|            'fileTitle'    => $offboardingSignature->getFileTitle(),
1153|    public function getOffboardingSignatureFileTypeFields(array $offboardingSignatures): array
1157|        foreach ($offboardingSignatures as $offboardingSignature) {
1158|            $result[] = $this->getOffboardingSignatureFileTypeField($offboardingSignature);
1164|    public function getOffboardingStepField(OffboardingStep $offboardingStep): array
1167|        // $offboardingMembers = $this->entityManager
1168|        //     ->getRepository(OffboardingMember::class)
1169|        //     ->findByCompanyOffboardingAndStep(
1170|        //         $offboardingStep->getCompany()->getId(),
1171|        //         $offboardingStep->getOffboarding()->getId(),
1172|        //         $offboardingStep->getId()
1176|            'id' => $offboardingStep->getId(),
1177|            'company' => $this->getCompanyFields($offboardingStep->getCompany()),
1178|            'offboarding' => $this->getOffboardingField($offboardingStep->getOffboarding()),
1179|            'name' => $offboardingStep->getName(),
1180|            'typeOfStepAdvance' => $this->getTypeOfStepAdvanceField($offboardingStep->getTypeOfStepAdvance()),
1181|            'daysCount' => $offboardingStep->getDaysCount(),
1182|            'relativeDirection' => $offboardingStep->getRelativeDirection() ? $this->getRelativeDirectionField($offboardingStep->getRelativeDirection()) : null,
1183|            'dateReference' => $offboardingStep->getDateReference() ? $this->getDateReferenceField($offboardingStep->getDateReference()) : null,
1184|            'activities' => $offboardingStep->getActivities(),
1185|            'creationDateTime' => $offboardingStep->getCreationDateTime()->format('Y-m-d H:i:s'),
1186|            //'offboardingMembers' => $this->getOffboardingMemberFields($offboardingMembers),
1191|    public function getOffboardingStepFields(array $offboardingSteps): array
1194|        foreach ($offboardingSteps as $step) {
1195|            $result[] = $this->getOffboardingStepField($step);
1200|    public function getOffboardingMemberStatusField(\App\Entity\OffboardingMemberStatus $offboardingMemberStatus): array
1203|            'id' => $offboardingMemberStatus->getId(),
1204|            'name' => $offboardingMemberStatus->getName(),
1210|    public function getOffboardingMemberStatusFields(array $offboardingMemberStatus): array
1215|        foreach ($offboardingMemberStatus as $status) {
1217|            $result[] = $this->getOffboardingMemberStatusField($status);
1223|    public function getOffboardingMemberField(\App\Entity\OffboardingMember $offboardingMember): array
1226|            'id' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
1227|            'company' => $offboardingMember->getCompany() ? [
1228|                'id' => $offboardingMember->getCompany()->getId(),
1229|                'name' => $offboardingMember->getCompany()->getName(),
1231|            'offboarding' => $offboardingMember->getOffboarding() ? [

File: src/Service/FlowableServices/OffboardingFormatterService.php
Match lines: 65
7|use App\Entity\Offboarding;
8|use App\Entity\OffboardingStep;
9|use App\Entity\OffboardingActivity;
10|use App\Entity\OffboardingMember;
11|use App\Entity\OffboardingMemberStatus;
12|use App\Entity\OffboardingCategory;
13|use App\Entity\OffboardingTypeActivity;
14|use App\Entity\OffboardingSignatureFileType;
26| * Service para transformar dados do Offboarding para o formato do Flowable
27| * Usado para iniciar processos de offboarding, aprovar etapas, notificações, etc.
29|class OffboardingFormatterService
43|     * Formata um offboarding completo para variáveis do Flowable
44|     * Usado para processos que precisam da estrutura completa do offboarding
46|    public function formatOffboardingForProcess(int $companyId, int $offboardingId, string $processType = 'offboarding', ?string $initiatorId = null): array
48|        $offboarding = $this->entityManager->getRepository(Offboarding::class)->find($offboardingId);
50|        if (!$offboarding) {
51|            throw new \Exception("Offboarding não encontrado: {$offboardingId}");
56|        // Busca etapas do offboarding
57|        $steps = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingStep::class)
58|            ->findBy(['offboarding' => $offboardingId]);
60|        // Busca membros do offboarding
61|        $members = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingMember::class)
62|            ->findBy(['offboarding' => $offboardingId]);
69|            $this->formatter->formatLong('offboardingId', $offboardingId, 'global'),
70|            $this->formatter->formatString('offboardingName', $offboarding->getName(), 'global'),
73|            // Dados do offboarding
74|            $this->formatter->formatString('description', $offboarding->getDescription() ?? ''),
75|            $this->formatter->formatBoolean('isActive', $offboarding->getIsActive()),
76|            $this->formatter->formatBoolean('blockAccessToPlatform', $offboarding->getBlockAccessToPlatform()),
77|            $this->formatter->formatLong('categoryId', $offboarding->getCategory()?->getId()),
78|            $this->formatter->formatString('categoryName', $offboarding->getCategory()?->getName() ?? ''),
83|            $this->formatter->formatJson('stepIds', $offboarding->getSteps() ?? []),
97|     * Formata um único membro do offboarding para variáveis do Flowable
100|    public function formatMemberForProcess(int $offboardingMemberId, string $processType = 'member_offboarding'): array
102|        $member = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingMember::class)->find($offboardingMemberId);
105|            throw new \Exception("Membro do offboarding não encontrado: {$offboardingMemberId}");
109|        $offboarding = $member->getOffboarding();
117|            $this->formatter->formatLong('offboardingId', $offboarding?->getId(), 'global'),
118|            $this->formatter->formatString('offboardingName', $offboarding?->getName() ?? '', 'global'),
122|            $this->formatter->formatLong('offboardingMemberId', $member->getId()),
139|            $this->formatter->formatBoolean('hasStartedOffboarding', $member->getHasStartedOffboarding()),
140|            $this->formatter->formatBoolean('hasFinishedOffboarding', $member->getHasFinishedOffboarding()),
161|     * Formata uma etapa do offboarding para variáveis do Flowable
164|    public function formatStepForProcess(int $stepId, ?int $offboardingMemberId = null): array
166|        $step = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingStep::class)->find($stepId);
176|            $this->formatter->formatLong('offboardingId', $step->getOffboarding()?->getId()),
192|        if ($offboardingMemberId) {
193|            $member = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingMember::class)->find($offboardingMemberId);
195|                $variables[] = $this->formatter->formatLong('offboardingMemberId', $member->getId());
204|     * Retorna todas as configurações auxiliares necessárias para o offboarding
207|    public function getOffboardingConfigurations(int $companyId): array
213|        $offboardingCategories = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingCategory::class)->findAll();
214|        $offboardingTypeActivities = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingTypeActivity::class)->findBy(['isActive' => true]);
215|        $offboardingSignatureFileTypes = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingSignatureFileType::class)->findBy(['companyId' => $companyId]);
216|        $offboardingMemberStatus = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingMemberStatus::class)->findAllOrdered();
218|        // Filtra date_references específicas para offboarding
220|            $allowedNames = ['Data de Rescisão do Membro', 'Data de Inicio do Offboarding', 'Data de inicio da etapa'];
228|            'offboardingCategories' => array_map(fn($c) => ['id' => $c->getId(), 'name' => $c->getName()], $offboardingCategories),
229|            'offboardingTypeActivities' => array_map(fn($t) => ['id' => $t->getId(), 'name' => $t->getName()], $offboardingTypeActivities),
230|            'offboardingSignatureFileTypes' => array_map(fn($s) => ['id' => $s->getId(), 'name' => $s->getName()], $offboardingSignatureFileTypes),
231|            'offboardingMemberStatus' => array_map(fn($s) => ['id' => $s->getId(), 'name' => $s->getName()], $offboardingMemberStatus),
236|     * Busca pendências de um membro para o offboarding
343|                'offboardingId' => $step->getOffboarding()?->getId(),
382|                'hasStartedOffboarding' => $member->getHasStartedOffboarding(),
383|                'hasFinishedOffboarding' => $member->getHasFinishedOffboarding(),

File: src/Service/FlowableServices/OrganogramaFormatterService.php
Match lines: 2
12| * Usado para iniciar processos de aprovação, onboarding, offboarding, etc.
72|     * Usado para processos de onboarding/offboarding individual

File: src/Service/Governance/CaseAutomation/GovernanceCaseAutomationEvaluator.php
Match lines: 1
254|            str_starts_with($caseKey, 'offboarding:') => GovernanceIntelligentControlWizardCatalog::MODULE_ACCESS_CONTROL,

File: src/Service/Governance/CaseAutomation/GovernanceCaseSnapshotFactory.php
Match lines: 1
141|            str_starts_with($caseKey, 'offboarding:') => GovernanceIntelligentControlWizardCatalog::MODULE_ACCESS_CONTROL,

File: src/Service/Governance/Grc/Detector/GovernanceDetectionPayloadFactory.php
Match lines: 3
101|            'offboarding' => 'Módulo de Offboarding',
126|            str_starts_with($id, 'offboarding:') => GovernanceIntelligentControlWizardCatalog::MODULE_ACCESS_CONTROL,
194|        if (str_starts_with($id, 'offboarding:')) {

File: src/Service/Governance/Grc/Detector/OffboardingDetector.php
Match lines: 25
9|use App\Entity\OffboardingMember;
13|final class OffboardingDetector implements GovernanceDetectorInterface
36|            ->select('om', 'statusEntity', 'offboarding', 'companyMember')
37|            ->from(OffboardingMember::class, 'om')
40|            ->leftJoin('om.offboarding', 'offboarding')
46|        /** @var OffboardingMember[] $members */
50|        foreach ($members as $offboardingMember) {
51|            $member = $offboardingMember->getCompanyMember();
52|            $offboarding = $offboardingMember->getOffboarding();
62|            $offboardingName = $offboarding ? (string) ($offboarding->getName() ?: 'Offboarding') : 'Offboarding';
63|            $statusName = (string) ($offboardingMember->getStatus()?->getName() ?? '');
64|            $prazoDias = $this->computePrazoDias($offboardingMember);
65|            $tipo = $this->resolveCaseTipo($offboardingMember, $statusName);
66|            $estado = $this->mapStatusToEstado($offboardingMember, $statusName);
69|                id: sprintf('offboarding:%d:member:%d', (int) $offboardingMember->getId(), $memberId),
70|                titulo: sprintf('Offboarding incompleto — %s', $offboardingName),
75|                origem: 'offboarding',
76|                submodulo: 'Módulo de Offboarding',
85|    private function computePrazoDias(OffboardingMember $offboardingMember): ?int
87|        $reference = $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate() ?? $offboardingMember->getRequestedAt();
93|        if (!$offboardingMember->getDismissalDate()) {
100|    private function mapStatusToEstado(OffboardingMember $offboardingMember, string $statusName): string
102|        if (!$offboardingMember->getLetterSent() && trim((string) ($offboardingMember->getLetterLink() ?? '')) === '') {
114|    private function resolveCaseTipo(OffboardingMember $offboardingMember, string $statusName): string
117|            (string) ($offboardingMember->getReason() ?? '') . ' ' . $statusName

File: src/Service/Governance/Grc/GovernanceCaseGrcEnrichmentService.php
Match lines: 31
21|use App\Entity\OffboardingMember;
60|        'offboarding:',
1866|        if (preg_match('/^offboarding:(\d+):member:(\d+)$/', $caseKey, $matches)) {
1867|            $offboardingMemberId = (int) $matches[1];
1869|            $offboardingMember = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingMember::class)->findOneBy([
1870|                'id' => $offboardingMemberId,
1874|            $origin['product_label'] = 'Módulo de Offboarding';
1875|            $origin['authorization_label'] = $offboardingMember instanceof OffboardingMember
1876|                ? (string) ($offboardingMember->getOffboarding()?->getName() ?: 'Offboarding')
1878|            $origin['requirement_label'] = $offboardingMember instanceof OffboardingMember
1879|                ? (string) ($offboardingMember->getCurrentStep()?->getName() ?: 'Processo de desligamento')
1881|            if ($offboardingMember instanceof OffboardingMember) {
1882|                $member = $offboardingMember->getCompanyMember();
1886|                $origin['origin_status_label'] = trim((string) ($offboardingMember->getStatus()?->getName() ?: '—'));
1888|            $origin['open_url'] = $this->buildOffboardingOriginUrl($company, $offboardingMemberId, $memberId);
2048|        if (preg_match('/^offboarding:(\d+):member:(\d+)$/', $caseKey, $matches)) {
2049|            return $this->buildOffboardingOriginUrl($company, (int) $matches[1], (int) $matches[2]);
2174|    private function buildOffboardingOriginUrl(Company $company, int $offboardingMemberId, int $memberId): ?string
2176|        if ($offboardingMemberId <= 0) {
2180|        $offboardingMember = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingMember::class)->findOneBy([
2181|            'id' => $offboardingMemberId,
2184|        if (!$offboardingMember instanceof OffboardingMember
2185|            || (int) ($offboardingMember->getCompanyMember()?->getId() ?? 0) !== $memberId) {
2189|        $offboarding = $offboardingMember->getOffboarding();
2190|        if ($offboarding === null) {
2191|            return sprintf('/offboarding/%d', (int) $company->getId());
2195|            '/offboarding/%d/offboarding-%d?offboardingMember=%d',
2197|            (int) $offboarding->getId(),
2198|            $offboardingMemberId,
2348|        if (preg_match('/^offboarding:(\d+):member:(\d+)$/', $caseKey, $matches) === 1) {
2349|            return $this->buildOffboardingOriginUrl($company, (int) $matches[1], (int) $matches[2]);

File: src/Service/Governance/Grc/GovernanceCasesDashboardService.php
Match lines: 1
45|        'offboarding' => 'Offboarding',

File: src/Service/Governance/Grc/GovernanceIntelligentControlModuleResolver.php
Match lines: 2
56|            'productSlugs' => ['offboarding', 'gestao-de-espaco-fisico'],
57|            'featureKeys' => ['offboarding', 'gestaoEspacoFisico'],

File: src/Service/Governance/Grc/GovernanceIntelligentControlWizardService.php
Match lines: 2
356|            if (str_starts_with($pattern, 'offboarding:')) {
392|            if (str_starts_with($pattern, 'offboarding:') || str_contains($pattern, ':critical_open')) {

File: src/Service/Governance/Grc/GrcCaseEscalationDescriptionBuilder.php
Match lines: 1
180|            'offboarding' => 'Offboarding',

File: src/Service/Governance/Grc/GrcCaseRulesEngine.php
Match lines: 5
46|        'Módulo de Offboarding',
512|        if (str_starts_with((string) ($detectionRow['id'] ?? ''), 'offboarding:')) {
611|            'offboarding' => false,
635|            'offboarding' => ['mandatory_access'],
901|        if (preg_match('/^offboarding:(\d+):member:\d+$/', $caseKey, $m)) {

File: src/Service/Governance/Grc/GrcCaseStateClassifier.php
Match lines: 6
151|            GovernanceIntelligentControlWizardCatalog::MODULE_ACCESS_CONTROL => $this->isOffboardingViolation(
212|            GovernanceIntelligentControlWizardCatalog::MODULE_ACCESS_CONTROL => str_contains($caseKey, 'offboarding:')
258|    private function isOffboardingViolation(
264|        if (! str_contains($caseKey, 'offboarding:')) {
272|        return (bool) ($detectionRow['offboarding_asset_not_returned'] ?? false);
322|            str_starts_with($caseKey, 'offboarding:') => GovernanceIntelligentControlWizardCatalog::MODULE_ACCESS_CONTROL,

File: src/Service/Governance/Grc/GrcOperationalContextResolver.php
Match lines: 1
25|        'Módulo de Offboarding',

File: src/Service/HubsDataService.php
Match lines: 1
357|                                ['id' => 'offboarding', 'label' => 'Offboarding', 'icon' => 'fa-regular fa-user-minus', 'pngIcon' => 'offboarding.png', 'route' => 'offboarding_index', 'params' => ['companyId' => '__COMPANY_ID__'], 'product' => 'offboarding', 'isMainProduct' => true, 'defaultActive' => true],

File: src/Service/JornadaMetahumanService.php
Match lines: 2
734|        foreach (['processId', 'onboardingId', 'offboardingId', 'crmBoardId', 'crmBoardName'] as $legacyKey) {
928|            'offboarding' => ['offboardingId'],

File: src/Service/KanbanFlowableSyncService.php
Match lines: 6
794|     * Chamado quando offboarding/onboarding é finalizado
878|            // Marcar o membro como completed - EXCETO para offboarding que usa 'approved'
879|            // Para offboarding, o status 'approved' mantém o membro visível na última etapa do Kanban
882|            if ($sourceType !== 'offboarding') {
886|                // Para offboarding, manter status 'approved' (já definido por syncFlowInstanceMemberStage)
888|                $this->log('info', 'Offboarding: mantendo status approved', ['memberId' => $member->getId()]);

File: src/Service/LLMRequestService.php
Match lines: 3
34|use App\Service\Tools\OffboardingService;
108|        $offboardingService = new OffboardingService();
150|            'Offboarding' => $offboardingService->getSystemInstructions(),

File: src/Service/LLMService.php
Match lines: 3
37|use App\Service\Tools\OffboardingService;
124|        $offboardingService = new OffboardingService();
167|            'Offboarding' => $offboardingService->getSystemInstructions(),

File: src/Service/MemberRemovalService.php
Match lines: 2
20| * Chamado pelo OffboardingMemberController ao concluir offboarding
21| * e pelo UserController ao detectar offboarding encerrado no login.

File: src/Service/MetaHuman/GovernanceCasesHubService.php
Match lines: 64
23|use App\Entity\Offboarding;
24|use App\Entity\OffboardingMember;
25|use App\Entity\OffboardingMemberSignature;
3811|        if (preg_match('/^offboarding:(\d+):member:(\d+)$/', $caseKey, $matches)) {
3812|            return $this->buildOffboardingCaseDetail($company, (int) $matches[1], (int) $matches[2], $case, false);
4289|            'offboarding' => 'SSMA > Offboarding',
4503|        if (preg_match('/^offboarding:/', $caseKey)) {
4508|                'message' => 'Os documentos deste caso são geridos no módulo de Offboarding.',
4509|                'kind' => 'offboarding',
5451|            str_starts_with($id, 'offboarding:') => GovernanceIntelligentControlWizardCatalog::MODULE_ACCESS_CONTROL,
5516|        if (str_starts_with($id, 'offboarding:')) {
5588|            'offboarding' => 'Módulo de Offboarding',
5670|    private function buildOffboardingCaseDetail(
5672|        int $offboardingMemberId,
5677|        $offboardingMember = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingMember::class)->find($offboardingMemberId);
5678|        if (!$offboardingMember instanceof OffboardingMember
5679|            || (int) $offboardingMember->getCompany()?->getId() !== (int) $company->getId()
5680|            || (int) $offboardingMember->getCompanyMember()?->getId() !== $memberId) {
5684|        $member = $offboardingMember->getCompanyMember();
5685|        $offboarding = $offboardingMember->getOffboarding();
5686|        $statusName = (string) ($offboardingMember->getStatus()?->getName() ?? '');
5687|        $offboardingName = (string) ($offboarding?->getName() ?: 'Offboarding');
5690|        $detail['case_code'] = sprintf('CASE-F%03d', $offboardingMemberId);
5691|        $detail['breadcrumb'] = 'SSMA > Offboarding';
5692|        $detail['modal_title'] = sprintf('Offboarding — %s', $offboardingName);
5693|        $detail['submodulo'] = 'Módulo de Offboarding';
5697|        $detail['desvio'] = $this->buildOffboardingDeviationText($offboardingMember, $offboarding, $statusName);
5698|        $detail['documents'] = $this->buildOffboardingDocuments($offboardingMember);
5699|        $detail['audit'] = $this->buildOffboardingAuditTimeline($offboardingMember, $offboarding, $member);
5748|    private function buildOffboardingDeviationText(
5749|        OffboardingMember $offboardingMember,
5750|        ?Offboarding $offboarding,
5753|        $memberName = (string) ($offboardingMember->getCompanyMember()?->getFullName() ?: 'o colaborador');
5754|        $processName = (string) ($offboarding?->getName() ?: 'offboarding');
5758|                'O processo de offboarding "%s" de %s não foi concluído.',
5765|        $reason = trim((string) ($offboardingMember->getReason() ?? ''));
5770|        $stepName = (string) ($offboardingMember->getCurrentStep()?->getName() ?? '');
5771|        $activityName = (string) ($offboardingMember->getCurrentActivity()?->getName() ?? '');
5779|        $description = trim((string) ($offboarding?->getDescription() ?? ''));
5830|    private function buildOffboardingDocuments(OffboardingMember $offboardingMember): array
5833|        $memberName = (string) ($offboardingMember->getCompanyMember()?->getFullName() ?: 'Colaborador');
5835|        $letterLink = trim((string) ($offboardingMember->getLetterLink() ?? ''));
5841|                uploadedAt: $offboardingMember->getUpdatedAt() ?? $offboardingMember->getCreatedAt(),
5847|        /** @var OffboardingMemberSignature[] $signatures */
5848|        $signatures = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingMemberSignature::class)->findBy(
5849|            ['offboardingMember' => $offboardingMember],
5860|                uploadedAt: $offboardingMember->getUpdatedAt() ?? $offboardingMember->getCreatedAt(),
5909|        if (preg_match('/^offboarding:/', $caseKey)) {
5912|                'empty_hint' => 'Os arquivos são gerenciados no módulo de Offboarding.',
6047|    private function buildOffboardingAuditTimeline(
6048|        OffboardingMember $offboardingMember,
6049|        ?Offboarding $offboarding,
6056|            $offboardingMember->getRequestedAt(),
6057|            'Solicitação de offboarding',
6058|            trim((string) ($offboardingMember->getReason() ?: 'Processo de desligamento iniciado.')),
6062|        if ($offboardingMember->getDismissalDate()) {
6064|                $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate(),
6066|                $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate()->format('d/m/Y'),
6071|        $statusName = (string) ($offboardingMember->getStatus()?->getName() ?? '');
6074|                $offboardingMember->getUpdatedAt() ?? new \DateTime(),
6075|                'Situação atual do offboarding',
6081|        $letterLink = trim((string) ($offboardingMember->getLetterLink() ?? ''));
6084|                $offboardingMember->getUpdatedAt() ?? $offboardingMember->getCreatedAt() ?? new \DateTime(),
6086|                'Documento de offboarding disponível para consulta.',

File: src/Service/MetaHuman/RiskIntelligenceCriticalIndicatorsSeeder.php
Match lines: 43
11|use App\Entity\OffboardingMember;
12|use App\Entity\OffboardingMemberStatus;
40|     *     member_ids: array{offboarding: list<int>, burnout: list<int>}
52|                'member_ids' => ['offboarding' => [], 'burnout' => []],
68|                'member_ids' => ['offboarding' => [], 'burnout' => []],
74|        $offboardingMemberIds = [];
78|        $offboardingSlots = min(5, count($personas));
79|        for ($i = 0; $i < $offboardingSlots; ++$i) {
82|            $offboardingMemberIds[] = (int) $persona['member_id'];
85|        $seeded[] = sprintf('passivo-operacional (%d persona(s))', $offboardingSlots);
109|            'personas' => max($offboardingSlots, count($burnoutPersonas)),
113|                'offboarding' => $offboardingMemberIds,
133|        $this->seedOpenOffboardingWithPendingFlow($company, $member, $today, $slotIndex);
138|    private function seedOpenOffboardingWithPendingFlow(
144|        $markerReason = self::MARKER . ' Offboarding crítico — passivo operacional #' . ($slotIndex + 1);
145|        $existing = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingMember::class)->findOneBy([
151|        if ($existing instanceof OffboardingMember) {
155|        $status = $this->resolveOpenOffboardingStatus();
156|        if (!$status instanceof OffboardingMemberStatus) {
173|                        'offboardingTypeActivityId' => 1,
180|                        'offboardingTypeActivityId' => 1,
187|                        'offboardingTypeActivityId' => 1,
204|                        'offboardingTypeActivityId' => 1,
213|        $offboardingMember = new OffboardingMember();
214|        $offboardingMember->setCompany($company);
215|        $offboardingMember->setCompanyMember($member);
216|        $offboardingMember->setStatus($status);
217|        $offboardingMember->setReason($markerReason);
218|        $offboardingMember->setRequestedAt($requestedAt);
219|        $offboardingMember->setRequestedByAdmin(true);
220|        $offboardingMember->setVisibleToCollaborator(false);
221|        $offboardingMember->setLetterSent(false);
222|        $offboardingMember->setLetterLink(null);
223|        $offboardingMember->setHasFinishedOffboarding(false);
224|        $offboardingMember->setHasStartedOffboarding(true);
225|        $offboardingMember->setStepsActivities($stepsActivities);
226|        $this->entityManager->persist($offboardingMember);
271|            $taskName = self::MARKER . ' Pendência offboarding #' . ($slotIndex + 1) . '-' . $i;
316|            $description = self::MARKER . ' Reembolso pendente offboarding #' . ($slotIndex + 1) . '-' . $i;
346|    private function resolveOpenOffboardingStatus(): ?OffboardingMemberStatus
348|        $repository = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingMemberStatus::class);
351|        if ($status instanceof OffboardingMemberStatus && (int) $status->getId() !== 4) {
356|            if ($candidate instanceof OffboardingMemberStatus && (int) $candidate->getId() !== 4) {

File: src/Service/NewPackageProductsService.php
Match lines: 1
36|        'offboarding' => 'Offboarding',

File: src/Service/OffboardingNotificationService.php
Match lines: 26
12|class OffboardingNotificationService
15|    private const PRODUCT = 'Offboarding';
25|    public function notifyOffboardingCreated(Company $company, string $offboardingName, ?User $sender = null): void
27|        $content = sprintf('Início de offboarding realizado: "%s" foi criado.', $offboardingName);
28|        $buttonUrl = sprintf('/offboarding/%d', $company->getId());
43|    public function notifyOffboardingStarted(Company $company, string $memberName, string $offboardingName, ?User $sender = null): void
45|        $content = sprintf('Início de offboarding realizado: "%s" iniciou o offboarding "%s".', $memberName, $offboardingName);
46|        $buttonUrl = sprintf('/offboarding/%d', $company->getId());
64|        $buttonUrl = sprintf('/offboarding/%d', $company->getId());
79|    public function notifyOffboardingFinished(Company $company, string $memberName, string $offboardingName, ?User $sender = null): void
81|        $content = sprintf('Finalização de offboarding realizada: "%s" concluiu o offboarding "%s".', $memberName, $offboardingName);
82|        $buttonUrl = sprintf('/offboarding/%d', $company->getId());
97|    public function notifyOffboardingUpdated(Company $company, string $offboardingName, ?User $sender = null): void
99|        $content = sprintf('O offboarding "%s" foi atualizado.', $offboardingName);
100|        $buttonUrl = sprintf('/offboarding/%d', $company->getId());
115|    public function notifyOffboardingDeleted(Company $company, string $offboardingName, ?User $sender = null): void
117|        $content = sprintf('O offboarding "%s" foi removido.', $offboardingName);
118|        $buttonUrl = sprintf('/offboarding/%d', $company->getId());
139|        $dedupeUrl = sprintf('/offboarding/%d?source=return_pending&user=%d&item=%s', $companyId, (int) $member->getId(), urlencode($itemName));
163|        $dedupeUrl = sprintf('/offboarding/%d?source=access_pending&member=%d&system=%s', $company->getId(), (int) $member->getId(), urlencode($systemName));
188|        $dedupeUrl = sprintf('/offboarding/%d?source=doc_not_signed&user=%d&doc=%s', $companyId, (int) $member->getId(), urlencode($documentName));
210|    public function notifyOffboardingIncomplete(Company $company, User $member, string $memberName, string $offboardingName): void
212|        $content = sprintf('Offboarding incompleto identificado: "%s" não finalizou "%s".', $memberName, $offboardingName);
214|        $dedupeUrl = sprintf('/offboarding/%d?source=incomplete&member=%d&ob=%s', $company->getId(), (int) $member->getId(), urlencode($offboardingName));
237|        $content = sprintf('Acesso não revogado: "%s" ainda possui acesso à plataforma após offboarding.', $memberName);
239|        $dedupeUrl = sprintf('/offboarding/%d?source=access_not_revoked&member=%d', $company->getId(), (int) $member->getId());

File: src/Service/OffboardingPendencyService.php
Match lines: 16
5|use App\Entity\OffboardingMember;
13| * Service para verificar e notificar pendências de um membro em processo de offboarding.
15| * Ao iniciar o offboarding, verifica automaticamente:
22|class OffboardingPendencyService
40|     * Chamado automaticamente ao iniciar o offboarding.
42|    public function checkAndNotifyPendencies(OffboardingMember $offboardingMember): array
44|        $companyMember = $offboardingMember->getCompanyMember();
46|            $this->logger->warning('[PENDENCY] CompanyMember não encontrado para OffboardingMember ID: ' . $offboardingMember->getId());
93|        $recipients = $this->resolveRecipients($companyMember, $company, $offboardingMember);
284|    private function resolveRecipients(CompanyMembers $member, Company $company, ?OffboardingMember $offboardingMember = null): array
289|        // 1. Responsável do Fluxo (offboardingFlowResponsible)
290|        if ($offboardingMember) {
291|            $offboarding = $offboardingMember->getOffboarding();
292|            if ($offboarding) {
293|                $flowResponsible = $offboarding->getOffboardingFlowResponsible();
374|            'offboarding_pendency-pending_items-notification',

File: src/Service/OffboardingToRecruitmentService.php
Match lines: 44
13|use App\Entity\Offboarding;
14|use App\Entity\OffboardingMember;
24| * OffboardingToRecruitmentService
26| * Cria automaticamente um Processo Seletivo (PS) quando um offboarding é concluído.
29| * - Extrair dados do contexto do offboarding (cargo, departamento, gestor)
42|class OffboardingToRecruitmentService
63|     * Cria um Processo Seletivo a partir dos dados de um offboarding concluído.
65|    public function createFromOffboarding(
71|            // 1. Resolver OffboardingMember
72|            $offboardingMember = $this->resolveOffboardingMember($flowMember);
73|            if (!$offboardingMember) {
74|                return $this->error('OffboardingMember não encontrado para o FlowInstanceMember');
79|            if ($automation instanceof FlowAutomation && $this->isDuplicate($offboardingMember, $automation, $flowMember)) {
81|                    'offboardingMemberId' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
86|            // 3. Extrair dados do contexto do offboarding
87|            $offContext = $this->extractOffboardingContext($offboardingMember);
89|            $company = $offboardingMember->getCompany();
91|                return $this->error('Empresa não encontrada para o membro do offboarding');
112|                'offboardingMemberId' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
159|                $this->recordCreation($offboardingMember, $automation, $flowMember, $result);
165|            $this->log('info', '✅ Processo Seletivo criado com sucesso via automação de offboarding', $result);
183|     * Resolve OffboardingMember a partir do FlowInstanceMember.
184|     * Segue o padrão existente: sourceType='offboarding', sourceId=offboarding.id
186|    private function resolveOffboardingMember(FlowInstanceMember $flowMember): ?OffboardingMember
188|        if ($flowMember->getSourceType() !== 'offboarding' || !$flowMember->getSourceId()) {
192|        $offboarding = $this->em->getRepository(Offboarding::class)->find($flowMember->getSourceId());
193|        if (!$offboarding) {
211|        return $this->em->getRepository(OffboardingMember::class)->findOneBy([
212|            'offboarding' => $offboarding,
218|     * Extrai dados relevantes do contexto do offboarding.
220|    private function extractOffboardingContext(OffboardingMember $member): array
232|            'flowResponsible' => $member->getOffboarding()?->getOffboardingFlowResponsible(),
233|            'offboardingName' => $member->getOffboarding()?->getName(),
366|            '{offboarding_name}' => $offContext['offboardingName'] ?? 'N/D',
371|        $process->setDescription('Processo seletivo criado automaticamente a partir de offboarding');
863|            'autoCreatedFrom' => 'offboarding',
922|                    if (in_array($activityType, ['selection_process', 'onboarding_variable', 'offboarding_variable'])) {
1168|            // Responsavel do fluxo de offboarding
1245|        OffboardingMember $member,
1279|                    'offboardingMemberId' => $member->getId(),
1294|                    'offboardingMemberId' => $member->getId(),
1317|        OffboardingMember $member,
1371|        error_log("[OffboardingToRecruitment] {$message} " . json_encode($context));
1374|            $this->logger->log($level, "[OffboardingToRecruitment] {$message}", $context);

File: src/Service/OffboardingWorkflowService.php
Match lines: 47
5|use App\Entity\Offboarding;
6|use App\Entity\OffboardingMember;
16| * Service responsável por integrar Offboarding com Flowable Workflow
18| * Este service gerencia a criação de processos de offboarding e a inicialização
19| * de workflows no Flowable para cada colaborador adicionado ao offboarding.
21|class OffboardingWorkflowService
38|     * Encontra ou cria um Process para o Offboarding
40|     * @param Offboarding $offboarding
43|    public function getOrCreateProcessForOffboarding(Offboarding $offboarding): Process
45|        // Buscar se já existe um Process associado a este offboarding
46|        // Nota: Pode ser necessário adicionar um campo 'offboarding_id' na tabela Process
52|        $processName = 'Offboarding - ' . $offboarding->getName();
55|            'company' => $offboarding->getCompany()
62|        // Criar novo Process para este offboarding
65|        $process->setCompany($offboarding->getCompany());
67|        $process->setIsTraining(Process::IS_NOT_TRAINING); // Offboarding não é treinamento
90|     * Inicia workflow para um OffboardingMember
92|     * @param OffboardingMember $offboardingMember
95|    public function startWorkflowForOffboardingMember(OffboardingMember $offboardingMember): array
98|            $offboarding = $offboardingMember->getOffboarding();
100|            if (!$offboarding) {
103|                    'message' => 'OffboardingMember não tem offboarding associado',
108|            // 1. Obter ou criar Process para este offboarding
109|            $process = $this->getOrCreateProcessForOffboarding($offboarding);
112|            $companyMember = $offboardingMember->getCompanyMember();
132|                    'message' => 'Nenhuma FlowInstance ativa encontrada para este offboarding. Configure o workflow primeiro.',
143|            $result['offboardingMemberId'] = $offboardingMember->getId();
151|            error_log('[OffboardingWorkflowService] Erro ao iniciar workflow: ' . $e->getMessage());
218|     * Obtém status do workflow para um OffboardingMember
220|     * @param OffboardingMember $offboardingMember
223|    public function getOffboardingMemberWorkflowStatus(OffboardingMember $offboardingMember): array
226|            $offboarding = $offboardingMember->getOffboarding();
228|            if (!$offboarding) {
231|                    'message' => 'OffboardingMember não tem offboarding associado'
236|            $processName = 'Offboarding - ' . $offboarding->getName();
239|                'company' => $offboarding->getCompany()
245|                    'message' => 'Process não encontrado para este offboarding'
250|            $user = $offboardingMember->getCompanyMember()->getUser();
268|            error_log('[OffboardingWorkflowService] Erro ao obter status: ' . $e->getMessage());
290|     * Lista todos os OffboardingMembers de um offboarding com seus status de workflow
292|     * @param Offboarding $offboarding
295|    public function getAllOffboardingMembersWithWorkflowStatus(Offboarding $offboarding): array
297|        $offboardingMemberRepository = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingMember::class);
298|        $members = $offboardingMemberRepository->findBy(['offboarding' => $offboarding]);
306|            $workflowStatus = $this->getOffboardingMemberWorkflowStatus($member);
309|                'offboardingMemberId' => $member->getId(),
314|                'offboardingStatus' => $member->getStatus()->getName(),

File: src/Service/Ontology/OntologySignalBridgeService.php
Match lines: 2
199|        'RISK_INDICATOR_CRITICAL_OFFBOARDING_LIABILITY' => [
286|        'RISK_INDICATOR_CRITICAL_OFFBOARDING_LIABILITY' => 'Passivo operacional',

File: src/Service/Ontology/OntologySignalTextCatalog.php
Match lines: 2
1087|        'RISK_INDICATOR_CRITICAL_OFFBOARDING_LIABILITY' => [
1089|            'description' => 'Risco elevado de passivo operacional associado a offboarding ou transição recente.',

File: src/Service/Ontology/RiskIndicator/RiskIndicatorComponentLabelResolver.php
Match lines: 4
194|                'category' => 'offboarding',
198|                'description' => 'Pendencias internas do fluxo de offboarding.',
199|                'category' => 'offboarding',
208|                'description' => 'Pendencias financeiras explicitas associadas ao offboarding.',

File: src/Service/Ontology/RiskIndicator/RiskIndicatorCriticalAlertsEvaluationService.php
Match lines: 8
16|use App\Service\PeopleAnalytics\OffboardingOperationalLiabilityRiskService;
47|        private OffboardingOperationalLiabilityRiskService $offboardingOperationalLiabilityRiskService,
340|            'offboarding_liability' => $this->offboardingOperationalLiabilityRiskService->buildModel($company, [
452|            'offboarding_liability' => [
453|                'fetch_key' => 'offboarding_liability',
454|                'service_class' => OffboardingOperationalLiabilityRiskService::class,
456|                'alert_type' => 'RISK_INDICATOR_CRITICAL_OFFBOARDING_LIABILITY',
459|                'metric_prefix' => 'offboarding_liability',

File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/Adriana/AdrianaRiskIndicatorPromptRegistry.php
Match lines: 3
52|                'alert_type' => 'RISK_INDICATOR_CRITICAL_OFFBOARDING_LIABILITY',
55|                'sources' => ['offboarding', 'projetos', 'tarefas', 'reembolsos'],
91|                'sources' => ['offboarding', 'cargos', 'equipes', 'histórico organizacional'],

File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/AtracaoRetencaoService.php
Match lines: 35
14| * - Camada de processo: Offboarding (execução, pendências, SLA)
34| * OFFBOARDING:
35| * - offboarding_members: Processos de desligamento
36| * - offboarding_member_status: Status dos processos
37| * - offboarding: Templates de offboarding
38| * - offboarding_category: Categorias de offboarding
77| * 8. getFunilOffboarding(): Funil - Etapas do processo
78| * 9. getTempoOffboarding(): Boxplot - Tempo por área
82| * @see docs/offboarding/04-people-analytics-integration.md
164|                'chart-funil-offboarding' => $this->getFunilOffboarding($filters),
165|                'chart-tempo-offboarding' => $this->getTempoOffboarding($filters),
1879|    // GRÁFICO 8: FUNIL DE OFFBOARDING
1883|     * GRÁFICO 8: Funil de Processos de Offboarding (Funil)
1885|     * Visualiza a distribuição dos processos de offboarding por status/etapa.
1889|     * - COUNT(DISTINCT offboarding_members.id) agrupado por status
1894|     * - Iniciado: Offboarding solicitado
1901|     * - offboarding_members: Processos de offboarding (id, company_id, requested_at, status_id)
1902|     * - offboarding_member_status: Status dos processos (id, name)
1903|     * - offboarding: Templates de offboarding
1904|     * - offboarding_category: Categorias de offboarding
1920|     * - Gráfico complementa análise de offboarding (docs/offboarding/04-people-analytics-integration.md)
1926|    private function getFunilOffboarding(array $filters): array
1941|            FROM offboarding_members om
1942|            INNER JOIN offboarding_member_status oms ON om.status_id = oms.id
2002|    // GRÁFICO 9: TEMPO DE OFFBOARDING
2006|     * GRÁFICO 9: Distribuição do Tempo de Offboarding (Boxplot)
2008|     * Analisa a distribuição do tempo de execução dos processos de offboarding por área.
2017|     * - min: Menor tempo de offboarding
2021|     * - max: Maior tempo de offboarding
2024|     * - offboarding_members: Processos de offboarding (requested_at, dismissal_date)
2049|     * - Comparar com SLA definido no offboarding_category
2054|    private function getTempoOffboarding(array $filters): array
2069|            FROM offboarding_members om
2444|            'offboarding_template_ids',
2445|            'offboarding_category_ids',

File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/ChurnRiskService.php
Match lines: 1
515|FROM offboarding_members om

File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/DynamicFilterService.php
Match lines: 4
222|            'status_ids' => $this->getOffboardingStatusOptions($companyId),
1642|     * Busca Status de Offboarding
1644|    private function getOffboardingStatusOptions(int $companyId): array
1650|            FROM offboarding_member_status oms

File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/Import/AiDataCrossingService.php
Match lines: 1
210|            'chart-funil-offboarding' => 'funnel',

File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/Metadata/AtracaoRetencaoMetadata.php
Match lines: 12
37|            ['id' => 'chart-funil-offboarding', 'title' => 'Funil de Offboarding', 'chartType' => 'funnel', 'size' => 'half'],
38|            ['id' => 'chart-tempo-offboarding', 'title' => 'Tempo de Offboarding por Área', 'chartType' => 'boxplot', 'size' => 'half'],
81|            'chart-funil-offboarding' => [
82|                'title' => 'Funil de Offboarding',
83|                'description' => 'Funil mostrando as etapas do processo de offboarding: Criado → Em Andamento → Encerrado.',
86|            'chart-tempo-offboarding' => [
87|                'title' => 'Tempo de Offboarding por Área',
88|                'description' => 'Boxplot por área mostrando a distribuição do tempo entre solicitação e conclusão do offboarding.',
159|            // Gráfico 8: Funil de Offboarding (4 filtros)
160|            'chart-funil-offboarding' => [
167|            // Gráfico 9: Tempo de Offboarding (4 filtros)
168|            'chart-tempo-offboarding' => [

File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/OffboardingOperationalLiabilityRiskService.php
Match lines: 60
8|use App\Entity\OffboardingMember;
16|class OffboardingOperationalLiabilityRiskService
18|    private const CLOSED_OFFBOARDING_STATUS_ID = 4;
38|        $offboardingMembers = $this->loadRelevantOffboardingMembers($company, $recentWindowDays, $referenceDate);
39|        $individualRows = $this->buildIndividualRows($offboardingMembers, $recentWindowDays, $referenceDate);
45|                'codigo' => 'passivo_operacional_offboarding',
46|                'nome' => 'Passivo Operacional de Offboarding',
54|                'offboarding_members.status/requestedAt/dismissalDate/visibleAt/requestedByAdmin/rejectionReason/letterSent/letterLink',
55|                'offboarding_members.stepsActivities/currentStep/currentActivity/hasFinishedOffboarding',
73|                'Nao foi encontrado um KPI pronto de passivo operacional de offboarding; a V0 deriva o score a partir do fluxo de desligamento e das responsabilidades remanescentes confirmadas no codigo.',
74|                'O modulo de reembolsos nao possui vinculacao nativa com um offboarding especifico; o uso aqui e contextual por colaborador.',
81|     * @return OffboardingMember[]
83|    private function loadRelevantOffboardingMembers(Company $company, int $recentWindowDays, \DateTimeInterface $referenceDate): array
86|            ->getRepository(OffboardingMember::class)
96|        return array_values(array_filter($rows, function (OffboardingMember $member) use ($recentWindowDays, $referenceDate): bool {
102|            if ($this->isOpenOffboarding($member)) {
112|     * @param OffboardingMember[] $offboardingMembers
115|    private function buildIndividualRows(array $offboardingMembers, int $recentWindowDays, \DateTimeInterface $referenceDate): array
119|        foreach ($offboardingMembers as $offboardingMember) {
120|            $companyMember = $offboardingMember->getCompanyMember();
125|            $flowPending = $this->buildFlowPendingMetrics($offboardingMember, $referenceDate);
129|                $offboardingMember,
153|                'offboarding_member_id' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
159|                'status_offboarding' => [
160|                    'id' => $offboardingMember->getStatus()?->getId(),
161|                    'nome' => $offboardingMember->getStatus()?->getName(),
173|                    'offboarding' => $flowPending,
184|                    'requested_at' => $offboardingMember->getRequestedAt()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s'),
185|                    'dismissal_date' => $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s'),
186|                    'visible_at' => $offboardingMember->getVisibleAt()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s'),
239|                count(array_filter($rows, static fn(array $row): bool => (bool) ($row['status_offboarding']['em_aberto'] ?? false))),
252|                    ($row['pendencias_por_categoria']['offboarding']['total_pendencias'] ?? 0)
274|                'total_offboardings' => count($rows),
275|                'offboardings_em_aberto' => count(array_filter($rows, static fn(array $row): bool => (bool) ($row['status_offboarding']['em_aberto'] ?? false))),
308|                'total_offboardings' => 0,
309|                'offboardings_em_aberto' => 0,
321|        $openCount = count(array_filter($individualRows, static fn(array $row): bool => (bool) ($row['status_offboarding']['em_aberto'] ?? false)));
334|                ($row['pendencias_por_categoria']['offboarding']['total_pendencias'] ?? 0)
354|            'total_offboardings' => count($individualRows),
355|            'offboardings_em_aberto' => $openCount,
375|        OffboardingMember $offboardingMember,
382|        $referenceDate = $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate() ?? $offboardingMember->getRequestedAt();
384|        $openDays = $offboardingMember->getRequestedAt() ? $this->daysBetween($offboardingMember->getRequestedAt(), $analysisReferenceDate) : 0;
385|        $isOpen = $this->isOpenOffboarding($offboardingMember);
410|    private function buildFlowPendingMetrics(OffboardingMember $offboardingMember, \DateTimeInterface $referenceDate): array
412|        $steps = $offboardingMember->getStepsActivities();
443|        $letterPending = !$offboardingMember->getLetterSent();
444|        $letterLinkPending = trim((string) ($offboardingMember->getLetterLink() ?? '')) === '';
445|        $visibilityPending = $offboardingMember->getVisibleAt() === null;
446|        $currentStepPending = $offboardingMember->getCurrentStep() !== null ? 1 : 0;
447|        $currentActivityPending = $offboardingMember->getCurrentActivity() !== null ? 1 : 0;
448|        $daysOpen = $offboardingMember->getRequestedAt() ? $this->daysBetween($offboardingMember->getRequestedAt(), $referenceDate) : 0;
472|            'current_step' => $offboardingMember->getCurrentStep()?->getName(),
473|            'current_activity' => $offboardingMember->getCurrentActivity()?->getName(),
721|                'fator' => 'offboarding_aberto_ou_recente_com_residual',
732|                'fator' => 'pendencias_internas_no_fluxo_de_offboarding',
784|                'fator' => 'acumulo_de_offboardings_em_aberto',
815|    private function isOpenOffboarding(OffboardingMember $offboardingMember): bool
817|        $statusId = $offboardingMember->getStatus()?->getId();
818|        return $statusId !== self::CLOSED_OFFBOARDING_STATUS_ID || !$offboardingMember->getHasFinishedOffboarding();

File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/RiskSignalsPresenter.php
Match lines: 2
489|            if ($slug === 'passivo-operacional' || str_contains($alertType, 'OFFBOARDING_LIABILITY')) {
490|                $coverage[$memberId]['offboarding_liability'] = true;

File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/TurnoverKnowledgeConcentrationRiskService.php
Match lines: 10
12|use App\Entity\OffboardingMember;
137|                'O historico de desligamento usa dismissalDate de offboarding como referencia de saida; a separacao entre desligamento voluntario e desligamento geral nao esta confirmada nesta base.',
729|            ->select('offboarding', 'cm', 'teamGroup')
730|            ->from(OffboardingMember::class, 'offboarding')
731|            ->join('offboarding.companyMember', 'cm')
733|            ->where('offboarding.company = :company')
734|            ->andWhere('offboarding.dismissalDate IS NOT NULL')
735|            ->andWhere('offboarding.dismissalDate BETWEEN :start AND :end')
749|            if (!$row instanceof OffboardingMember) {
1449|                'fonte' => 'OffboardingMember::dismissalDate',

File: src/Service/ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier.php
Match lines: 3
318|                        'message' => 'O colaborador {{member_name}} entrou na etapa "Ciclo de Encerramento". Esta etapa indica encerramento do ciclo inicial e prepara os próximos passos operacionais da empresa (incluindo tratativas de desligamento/offboarding quando aplicável).',
329|                            'message' => 'O colaborador {{member_name}} entrou na etapa "Ciclo de Encerramento". Esta etapa indica encerramento do ciclo inicial e prepara os próximos passos operacionais da empresa (incluindo tratativas de desligamento/offboarding quando aplicável).',
457|        if (in_array($orchestratorSlug, ['processo_seletivo', 'onboarding', 'offboarding'], true)) {

File: src/Service/QuestionnaireProcessorService.php
Match lines: 67
65|use App\Entity\Offboarding;
66|use App\Entity\OffboardingCategory;
67|use App\Entity\OffboardingSignatureFileType;
68|use App\Entity\OffboardingActivity;
69|use App\Entity\OffboardingTypeActivity;
70|use App\Entity\OffboardingMember;
71|use App\Entity\OffboardingMemberStatus;
11368|    public function processCreateOffboarding(array $respostas, $company): array
11400|            throw new \Exception('Nome do offboarding e obrigatorio');
11403|            throw new \Exception('Categoria do offboarding e obrigatoria');
11406|            throw new \Exception('Descricao do offboarding e obrigatoria');
11409|        $category = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingCategory::class)->find($categoryId);
11414|        $offboarding = new Offboarding();
11415|        $offboarding->setCompany($company);
11416|        $offboarding->setName($name);
11417|        $offboarding->setIsActive($isActive === '1');
11418|        $offboarding->setCategory($category);
11419|        $offboarding->setBlockAccessToPlatform($blockAccess === '1');
11420|        $offboarding->setDescription($description);
11421|        $offboarding->setCreationDateTime(new \DateTime());
11422|        $offboarding->setSteps(null);
11424|        $this->entityManager->persist($offboarding);
11428|            'id' => $offboarding->getId(),
11429|            'nome' => $offboarding->getName()
11433|    public function processCreateOffboardingSignatureFileType(array $respostas, $company): array
11459|        $signatureFileType = new OffboardingSignatureFileType();
11474|    public function processCreateOffboardingActivity(array $respostas, $company): array
11588|        $typeActivity = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingTypeActivity::class)->find($typeActivityId);
11618|        $activity = new OffboardingActivity();
11620|        $activity->setOffboardingTypeActivity($typeActivity);
11629|        $activity->setOffboardingSignatureFiles(!empty($signatureFiles) ? $signatureFiles : null);
11647|    public function processRequestOffboarding(
11652|        bool $requireOffboarding,
11658|        $offboardingId = null;
11673|                case 'offboarding_id':
11674|                    $offboardingId = (int)($q['content'] ?? 0);
11736|        if ($requireOffboarding && !$offboardingId) {
11737|            throw new \Exception('Selecione o modelo de offboarding');
11740|        $offboarding = null;
11741|        if ($offboardingId) {
11742|            $offboarding = $this->entityManager->getRepository(Offboarding::class)->find($offboardingId);
11743|            if (!$offboarding || $offboarding->getCompany()?->getId() !== $company->getId()) {
11744|                throw new \Exception('Offboarding nao encontrado');
11749|        $status = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingMemberStatus::class)->find($statusId);
11758|        $member = new OffboardingMember();
11760|        $member->setOffboarding($offboarding);
11802|    public function processDecisionOffboardingRequest(array $respostas, $company): array
11804|        $offboardingMemberId = null;
11806|        $noOffboarding = null;
11808|        $offboardingId = null;
11816|                case 'offboarding_member_id':
11817|                    $offboardingMemberId = (int)($q['content'] ?? 0);
11822|                case 'no_offboarding':
11823|                    $noOffboarding = (string)($q['content'] ?? '');
11831|                case 'offboarding_id':
11832|                    $offboardingId = (int)($q['content'] ?? 0);
11843|        if (!$offboardingMemberId) {
11850|        $member = $this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingMember::class)->find($offboardingMemberId);
11856|            $member->setStatus($this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingMemberStatus::class)->find(2));
11864|            if ($noOffboarding === '1') {
11865|                $member->setOffboarding(null);
11866|            } elseif ($offboardingId) {
11867|                $offboarding = $this->entityManager->getRepository(Offboarding::class)->find($offboardingId);
11868|                if (!$offboarding || $offboarding->getCompany()?->getId() !== $company->getId()) {
11869|                    throw new \Exception('Offboarding nao encontrado');
11871|                $member->setOffboarding($offboarding);
11877|            $member->setStatus($this->entityManager->getRepository(OffboardingMemberStatus::class)->find(5));

File: src/Service/Tools/OffboardingService.php
Match lines: 50
5|class OffboardingService
7|    private string $systemInstructions = "Voce e um Assistente Especializado em Offboarding. Quando o usuario solicitar ajuda, retorne APENAS o JSON dentro das tags <QUESTIONARIO> ou <DIRECIONAMENTO>.
12|                \"questionario\": \"criar_offboarding\"
19|                \"questionario\": \"adicionar_documento_assinatura_offboarding\"
26|                \"questionario\": \"adicionar_atividade_offboarding\"
37|            5. Abrir offboarding:
41|                    \"destino\": \"Offboarding\",
42|                    \"mensagem\": \"Para abrir o Offboarding, clique no botao abaixo.\",
44|                    \"route\": \"/offboarding/{companyId}\"
57|            'questionario' => 'criar_offboarding'
62|            'questionario' => 'adicionar_documento_assinatura_offboarding'
67|            'questionario' => 'adicionar_atividade_offboarding'
84|        'abrir_offboarding' => [
85|            'display' => 'Abrir Offboarding',
87|            'direcionamento' => 'Offboarding',
88|            'mensagem' => 'Para abrir o Offboarding, clique no botao abaixo.',
90|            'route' => '/offboarding/{companyId}'
95|        'criar_offboarding' => [
96|            'type' => 'criar_offboarding',
98|            'description' => 'Preencha os dados para criar um modelo de offboarding.',
128|                    'data_source' => 'offboarding_categories',
152|                    'id' => 'criar_offboarding',
163|                    'route' => '/offboarding/{companyId}'
167|        'adicionar_documento_assinatura_offboarding' => [
168|            'type' => 'adicionar_documento_assinatura_offboarding',
202|                    'route' => '/offboarding/{companyId}'
206|        'adicionar_atividade_offboarding' => [
207|            'type' => 'adicionar_atividade_offboarding',
219|                    'data_source' => 'offboarding_type_activity',
268|                    'data_source' => 'offboarding_signature_file_type',
316|                        [ 'value' => '2', 'label' => 'Data de inicio do offboarding' ],
365|                    'id' => 'criar_atividade_offboarding',
376|                    'route' => '/offboarding/{companyId}'
415|                    'route' => '/offboarding/{companyId}'
473|                    'id' => 'offboarding_id',
474|                    'question' => 'Modelo de Offboarding',
477|                    'description' => 'Selecione o modelo de offboarding',
478|                    'data_source' => 'offboarding_templates',
493|                    'route' => '/offboarding/{companyId}'
505|                    'id' => 'offboarding_member_id',
510|                    'data_source' => 'offboarding_requests',
526|                    'id' => 'no_offboarding',
527|                    'question' => 'Nao Aplicar Offboarding',
530|                    'description' => 'Selecione se nao deseja aplicar offboarding',
548|                    'id' => 'offboarding_id',
549|                    'question' => 'Offboarding',
552|                    'description' => 'Selecione o modelo de offboarding',
553|                    'data_source' => 'offboarding_templates',
554|                    'visible_when' => 'no_offboarding:0',
578|                    'route' => '/offboarding/{companyId}'

File: src/Service/UserProcessFlowSyncService.php
Match lines: 3
212|        // Check if template has variable stages (stages with selection_process, onboarding_variable, or offboarding_variable activities)
217|                if (in_array($activityType, ['selection_process', 'onboarding_variable', 'offboarding_variable'])) {
307|                if (in_array($activityType, ['selection_process', 'onboarding_variable', 'offboarding_variable'])) {

File: src/Service/WorkflowOrchestratorBuiltinStages.php
Match lines: 28
8| * Hardcoded default stages / templates for Processo Seletivo, Onboarding and Offboarding (orchestrator).
491|     * Retorna os templates do Offboarding separados por tipos (variável e fixo)
494|     * - Se o offboarding tem apenas 1 etapa: colaborador vai direto para "Etapa Final"
495|     * - Se o offboarding tem N etapas (N > 1): etapas 1 a N-1 ficam em "Etapa Intermediária", etapa N fica em "Etapa Final"
497|    public function getOffboardingTemplates(): array
502|                    'id' => 'etapa-intermediaria-offboarding',
504|                    'description' => 'Etapa intermediária vinculada ao offboarding. Contém as primeiras etapas do offboarding (exceto a última). Se o offboarding tiver apenas 1 etapa, o colaborador vai direto para a Etapa Final.',
519|                                'template' => 'offboarding_stage_enter',
525|                                ['type' => 'send_email', 'config' => ['to' => 'flow_responsible', 'template' => 'offboarding_stage_enter'], 'orderIndex' => 0],
531|                            'name' => 'Avançar quando concluída etapa do offboarding',
537|                    'id' => 'etapa-final-offboarding',
539|                    'description' => 'Etapa final vinculada ao offboarding. Contém a última etapa do offboarding. Se o offboarding tiver apenas 1 etapa, o colaborador entra diretamente aqui.',
549|                            'name' => 'Criar Processo Seletivo ao concluir offboarding',
550|                            'triggerType' => 'on_offboarding_complete',
554|                                ['type' => 'on_offboarding_complete', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0],
571|     * Retorna as etapas padrão do Offboarding
574|    public function getOffboardingStages(): array
584|                    'name' => 'Offboarding',
595|                            'template' => 'offboarding_stage_enter',
601|                            ['type' => 'send_email', 'config' => ['to' => 'flow_responsible', 'template' => 'offboarding_stage_enter'], 'orderIndex' => 0],
614|                    'name' => 'Offboarding',
641|                    'name' => 'Offboarding',
647|                        'name' => 'Criar Processo Seletivo ao concluir offboarding',
648|                        'triggerType' => 'on_offboarding_complete',
652|                            ['type' => 'on_offboarding_complete', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0],
855|            'offboarding' => $type === 'variavel'
856|                ? ($this->getOffboardingTemplates()['variavel'] ?? [])
857|                : $this->getOffboardingStages(),

File: src/Service/ai_committee/HcmCommitteeEntitySnapshotBuilder.php
Match lines: 11
10|use App\Entity\OffboardingMember;
14|use App\Service\ai_committee\Snapshot\OffboardingMemberSnapshotMapper;
20| * Carrega registo de negócio MetaHuman (offboarding, SSMA, Voz Ativa) para o comitê HCM.
24| * — UC1 Offboarding: membro, categoria (nome configurado), etapas/actividade, responsável de solicitação (perfil), status, motivo, jornada.
30|    public const KIND_OFFBOARDING_MEMBER = 'offboarding_member';
46|        private OffboardingMemberSnapshotMapper $offboardingMemberSnapshotMapper,
77|            self::KIND_OFFBOARDING_MEMBER => $this->snapshotOffboardingMember($companyId, $id),
88|    private function snapshotOffboardingMember(int $companyId, int $id): ?array
90|        $om = $this->em->getRepository(OffboardingMember::class)->find($id);
91|        if (!$om instanceof OffboardingMember) {
103|            return $this->offboardingMemberSnapshotMapper->mapFromEntity($om, $companyId, $memberLabel, $memberId);

File: src/Service/ai_committee/HcmCommitteeScreenPrefillMapper.php
Match lines: 16
12| * — UC1: Offboarding (categoria = nome configurado pela empresa) mapeada para select T2 com valor «outro» quando não casar com advertência/suspensão/justa causa/fase de defesa.
45|        if ($kind !== HcmCommitteeEntitySnapshotBuilder::KIND_OFFBOARDING_MEMBER) {
49|                'metaHints' => ['mismatch' => 'Este UC espera registo de Offboarding; o contexto carregado é de outro tipo.'],
54|        if (isset($fields['offboarding_member_id']) && (int) $fields['offboarding_member_id'] > 0) {
55|            $modal['offboarding_case_id'] = (string) (int) $fields['offboarding_member_id'];
79|        $lines = $this->offboardingFieldLinesForDescriptionAppend($fields);
81|        $append = $lines !== [] ? "\n\n[Contexto carregado do sistema — Offboarding (completo)]\n".implode("\n", $lines) : '';
84|            'origem_ecra' => 'Operações › Jornada de trabalho › Offboarding',
86|            'offboarding_member_id' => $fields['offboarding_member_id'] ?? null,
87|            'offboardingMemberFullV1' => $snapshot['offboardingMemberFullV1'] ?? null,
101|        if ($kind === HcmCommitteeEntitySnapshotBuilder::KIND_OFFBOARDING_MEMBER) {
110|            return ['modalFields' => [], 'descriptionAppend' => '', 'metaHints' => ['mismatch' => 'UC2 espera SSMA, Voz Ativa ou offboarding (com company_member_id).']];
310|    private function offboardingFieldLinesForDescriptionAppend(array $fields): array
315|            'offboardingMemberFullV1',
317|            'documentos_offboarding_v1',
319|            'file_management_offboarding_v1',

File: src/Service/ai_committee/Snapshot/OffboardingMemberSnapshotMapper.php
Match lines: 67
7|use App\Entity\Offboarding;
8|use App\Entity\OffboardingActivity;
9|use App\Entity\OffboardingMember;
10|use App\Entity\OffboardingMemberSignature;
11|use App\Entity\OffboardingSignatureFileType;
16| * Full read-only snapshot of an {@see OffboardingMember} row for HCM UC1 (litigation) and related flows.
18|final class OffboardingMemberSnapshotMapper
23|    private const FILE_MANAGEMENT_OFFBOARDING_DOCUMENT_TYPES = [
24|        'checklist_de_offboarding',
50|     *     offboardingMemberFullV1: array<string, mixed>
53|    public function mapFromEntity(OffboardingMember $om, int $companyId, string $memberLabel, ?int $memberId): array
56|            throw new \InvalidArgumentException('OffboardingMember company mismatch.');
59|        $off = $om->getOffboarding();
62|        $offboardingName = null;
63|        $offboardingId = null;
65|        if ($off instanceof Offboarding) {
66|            $offboardingId = $off->getId();
67|            $offboardingName = $off->getName();
74|                'offboarding_id' => $offboardingId,
75|                'nome' => $offboardingName,
124|            'offboarding_member_id' => $om->getId(),
150|            'has_started_offboarding' => (bool) $om->getHasStartedOffboarding(),
151|            'has_finished_offboarding' => (bool) $om->getHasFinishedOffboarding(),
161|        $documentosOffboardingV1 = $this->buildDocumentosOffboardingCatalog(
169|        $fileManagementOffboardingV1 = $this->loadFileManagementOffboardingDocuments($om->getCompanyMember());
171|        $offboardingMemberFullV1 = [
173|            'modelo_offboarding' => $templateBlock,
175|            'documentos_offboarding_v1' => $documentosOffboardingV1,
177|            'file_management_offboarding_v1' => $fileManagementOffboardingV1,
185|                'offboarding_member_id' => $om->getId(),
188|                'offboarding_template_id' => $offboardingId,
189|                'offboarding_template_nome' => $offboardingName,
208|                'offboarding_template_descricao' => $templateBlock['descricao'] ?? null,
209|                'offboarding_template_ativo' => $templateBlock['ativo'] ?? null,
210|                'offboarding_bloquear_acesso' => $templateBlock['bloquear_acesso_plataforma'] ?? null,
216|                'has_started_offboarding' => $om->getHasStartedOffboarding(),
217|                'has_finished_offboarding' => $om->getHasFinishedOffboarding(),
227|                'documentos_offboarding_v1' => $documentosOffboardingV1,
228|                'documentos_offboarding_resumo' => $this->summarizeDocumentos($documentosOffboardingV1),
231|                'file_management_offboarding_v1' => $fileManagementOffboardingV1,
232|                'file_management_offboarding_resumo' => $this->summarizeFileManagementDocs($fileManagementOffboardingV1),
239|            'kind' => HcmCommitteeEntitySnapshotBuilder::KIND_OFFBOARDING_MEMBER,
242|            'nota' => 'offboardingMemberFullV1 inclui membro, modelo, assinaturas_v1, documentos_offboarding_v1, anexos_jornada_v1 e file_management_offboarding_v1; categoria_desligamento_nome não é enum fixo de medida disciplinar.',
244|            'offboardingMemberFullV1' => $offboardingMemberFullV1,
280|    private function loadMemberSignatures(OffboardingMember $om): array
282|        $rows = $this->em->getRepository(OffboardingMemberSignature::class)->findBy(
283|            ['offboardingMember' => $om],
289|            if (!$signature instanceof OffboardingMemberSignature) {
311|    private function buildDocumentosOffboardingCatalog(
312|        OffboardingMember $om,
335|                'origem' => 'offboarding_member.letter_link',
347|                    'origem' => 'offboarding_member_signature',
358|                    'origem' => 'offboarding_signature_file_type',
386|                'origem' => 'offboarding_activity.jornada',
388|                'offboarding_activity_id' => $typeRow['offboarding_activity_id'] ?? null,
402|        OffboardingMember $om,
407|        if ($activityIds === [] && $om->getCurrentActivity() instanceof OffboardingActivity) {
417|        $activities = $this->em->getRepository(OffboardingActivity::class)->findBy(['id' => $activityIds]);
420|            if (!$activity instanceof OffboardingActivity) {
426|            foreach ($this->normalizeSignatureFileTypeIds($activity->getOffboardingSignatureFiles()) as $typeId) {
427|                $typeIds[$typeId] = ['offboarding_activity_id' => $activity->getId()];
434|        $types = $this->em->getRepository(OffboardingSignatureFileType::class)->findBy(['id' => array_keys($typeIds)]);
437|            if (!$type instanceof OffboardingSignatureFileType) {
448|                'offboarding_activity_id' => $meta['offboarding_activity_id'] ?? null,
497|                $candidate = $item['id'] ?? $item['signatureFileTypeId'] ?? $item['offboardingSignatureFileTypeId'] ?? null;
572|    private function loadFileManagementOffboardingDocuments(mixed $companyMember): array
588|        foreach (self::FILE_MANAGEMENT_OFFBOARDING_DOCUMENT_TYPES as $i => $type) {

File: src/Service/ai_committee/Snapshot/WorkAccidentCorrelatedContextV1Assembler.php
Match lines: 33
14|use App\Entity\OffboardingMember;
22|use App\Repository\OffboardingMemberRepository;
48|        'checklist_de_offboarding',
84|        private OffboardingMemberRepository $offboardingMemberRepository,
88|        private ?OffboardingMemberSnapshotMapper $offboardingMemberSnapshotMapper = null,
136|            'nota' => 'Contexto correlacionado do sistema (cadastro, eSocial CAT/S-2230, BPM disciplinar, File Management, Voz Ativa, offboarding, anexos de sessões, telemetria doc73, hints RAG normativo, CAPA/inspeções). Complementa o registo de origem; null = ausente no tenant.',
148|            'offboardingRelatedV1' => $this->loadOffboardingRelated($user, $cm),
160|            $out['offboardingRelatedV1'] ?? null,
214|            ? 'Agregado para '.$ucLabel.' a partir do company_member_id (origem: '.$kind.'); inclui cadastro, eSocial CAT/S-2230, BPM disciplinar, File Management, offboarding, Voz Ativa, anexos, telemetria, RAG hints, CAPA SSMA e inspeções.'
342|        if ($kind === HcmCommitteeEntitySnapshotBuilder::KIND_OFFBOARDING_MEMBER) {
343|            $om = $this->em->getRepository(OffboardingMember::class)->find($entityId);
344|            if ($om instanceof OffboardingMember
805|    private function loadOffboardingRelated(User $user, CompanyMembers $cm): array
812|        $members = $this->offboardingMemberRepository->findByCompanyMember($cm);
816|            if (!$om instanceof OffboardingMember) {
827|            if ($this->offboardingMemberSnapshotMapper !== null) {
830|                    $full = $this->offboardingMemberSnapshotMapper->mapFromEntity($om, $companyId, $label, (int) $cm->getId());
833|                        'offboarding_member_id' => $om->getId(),
840|                            'documentos_offboarding_v1_resumo' => $fields['documentos_offboarding_v1_resumo'] ?? null,
843|                        '_source' => 'offboarding_member_snapshot_mapper',
851|                    'offboarding_member_id' => $om->getId(),
856|                    '_source' => 'offboarding_member',
1006|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>>|null $offboardingRows
1014|        ?array $offboardingRows,
1031|        $offboardingOpen = false;
1032|        if ($offboardingRows !== null) {
1033|            foreach ($offboardingRows as $ob) {
1034|                if (\is_array($ob) && ($ob['offboarding_member_id'] ?? null) !== null) {
1035|                    $offboardingOpen = true;
1048|        if ($offboardingOpen) {
1049|            $flags[] = 'offboarding_journey_correlated';
1058|                'offboardingCorrelated' => $offboardingOpen,
1061|            'note' => 'Validação cruzada heurística SSMA↔CAT↔afastamento↔offboarding; não substitui apuração oficial nem árvore de causas.',

File: src/Service/ai_committee/SpecializedCommitteeCatalog.php
Match lines: 15
119|CASO DE USO (UC1): risco de litígio disciplinar ligado a advertência, suspensão ou demissão por justa causa — ancorado tipicamente no Offboarding.
121|ORIGEM TÍPICA NO PRODUTO: Operações · Jornada de trabalho · Offboarding.
146|- Bloco `correlatedSystemContextV1` no snapshot servidor: cadastro, eSocial CAT (S-2210) + cruzamento SSMA↔CAT, afastamentos (S-2230 em employeeBasics), BPM disciplinar, File Management, Voz Ativa e offboarding correlacionados, anexos de sessões anteriores (disciplinary_case_attachment), telemetria doc73 UC2, hints para RAG normativo NR/SOP em tempo real.
160|- Bloco `correlatedSystemContextV1`: cadastro, eSocial CAT/S-2230, BPM disciplinar, File Management, offboarding, Voz Ativa, anexos de sessões, telemetria doc73, CAPA SSMA (`ssmaCapaActionsV1`), inspeções recentes, validação cruzada (`preventiveSystemSignalsV1`), pacote T3/uploads da sessão (`currentSessionEvidencePackageV1`).
566|                    'id' => 'offboarding_case_id',
567|                    'label' => 'Caso de offboarding',
569|                    'widget' => 'offboarding_case_select',
571|                    'helpText' => 'Cada opção é um pedido de offboarding de um colaborador (não o modelo/template).',
1128|                ['code' => 'person_matricula', 'label' => 'Pessoa / matrícula (offboarding).'],
1499|            'offboarding_case_id' => ['offboardingCaseId', 'caso_offboarding_id'],
1630|            self::UC_LITIGATION_RISK => [AiCommitteeSourceRecordKind::OFFBOARDING_CASE],
1635|                AiCommitteeSourceRecordKind::OFFBOARDING_CASE,
1672|                        'message' => 'hcmEntityRef.kind não corresponde a este caso de uso. Prefira sourceRecord (ex.: offboarding_case, ssma_occurrence, voz_ativa_record).',
1684|            HcmCommitteeEntitySnapshotBuilder::KIND_OFFBOARDING_MEMBER => AiCommitteeSourceRecordKind::OFFBOARDING_CASE,
1906|            if ($widget === 'offboarding_case_select' || $widget === 'company_member_select') {

File: src/Service/ai_committee/SpecializedCommitteeHcmDocRagScopeV1.php
Match lines: 2
118|            'offboarding',
233|- procedimentos de offboarding e trilho disciplinar quando aplicável ao caso.

File: src/Service/ai_committee/SpecializedCommitteeModalPrefillFromSourceMerger.php
Match lines: 5
101|            && $topKind === HcmCommitteeEntitySnapshotBuilder::KIND_OFFBOARDING_MEMBER) {
102|            $obId = (int) ($snap['id'] ?? $fields['offboarding_member_id'] ?? 0);
104|                $this->fillIfEmptyString($out, 'offboarding_case_id', (string) $obId);
108|                $mapped = $this->mapOffboardingLabelToTipoCaso($cat);
187|    private function mapOffboardingLabelToTipoCaso(string $label): ?string

File: src/Service/ai_committee/SpecializedCommitteeSessionDashboardDataResolver.php
Match lines: 2
1760|        $off = \is_array($corr['offboardingRelatedV1'] ?? null) ? $corr['offboardingRelatedV1'] : [];
1763|                'title' => 'Offboarding correlacionado',

File: src/Service/ai_committee/SpecializedCommitteeSessionSnapshotAssembler.php
Match lines: 5
74|                        $snap = $this->maybeAttachLinkedEmployeeSnapshotFromOffboarding($snap, $user);
118|     * UC1 / offboarding: enrich server snapshot with employee dossier when the case row carries company_member_id
125|    private function maybeAttachLinkedEmployeeSnapshotFromOffboarding(array $snap, User $user): array
127|        if (($snap['kind'] ?? '') !== HcmCommitteeEntitySnapshotBuilder::KIND_OFFBOARDING_MEMBER) {
144|        $snap['linkedEmployeeContextNote'] = 'Agregado automaticamente a partir do company_member_id do offboarding; valores null = dado ausente ou fora do âmbito. Diferente de selectedEmployeeSnapshot em hcmMetaHumanContext (T2 / partes).';

File: src/Service/ai_committee/SpecializedContextSnapshotService.php
Match lines: 15
21| * Nota produto: `source_entity=offboarding` usa o ID de {@see \App\Entity\OffboardingMember} (linha da solicitação),
22| * não o template {@see \App\Entity\Offboarding}.
93|            'offboarding' => \in_array($canonical, [
120|            'offboarding' => ['kind' => HcmCommitteeEntitySnapshotBuilder::KIND_OFFBOARDING_MEMBER, 'id' => $entityId],
136|            'offboarding' => $this->envelopeOffboarding($entityId, $canonicalUc, $inner),
159|    private function envelopeOffboarding(int $entityId, string $canonicalUc, array $inner): array
163|        $catHint = $fieldsInner['offboarding_template_nome'] ?? null;
164|        [$done, $pending] = $this->summarizeOffboardingStepsActivities(
179|            'source_entity' => 'offboarding',
185|                    'offboarding_member_id' => $fieldsInner['offboarding_member_id'] ?? $entityId,
194|                $done !== [] ? ['key' => 'etapas_concluidas', 'label' => 'Etapas concluídas', 'value' => $done, 'source' => 'offboarding', 'verified' => true] : null,
195|                $pending !== [] ? ['key' => 'etapas_pendentes', 'label' => 'Etapas pendentes', 'value' => $pending, 'source' => 'offboarding', 'verified' => true] : null,
196|                !empty($fieldsInner['responsavel_solicitacao_nome']) ? ['key' => 'responsavel_solicitacao', 'label' => 'Responsável pela solicitação', 'value' => [$fieldsInner['responsavel_solicitacao_nome']], 'source' => 'offboarding', 'verified' => true] : null,
206|                'label' => $catName !== '' ? $catName : 'offboarding',
513|    private function summarizeOffboardingStepsActivities(mixed $jornadaResumo): array

code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "function getReason|getDismissalDate", "file_patterns": ["src/Entity/OffboardingMember.php"]}
No matches found
Request #9 deepseek-v4-flash P:94.38K C:392 CR:54.53K CW:0 5205ms
Reasoning
There's a `ServicePackage.php` entity with offboarding mapping: `'offboarding' => ['label' => 'Offboarding', ...]` and `'offboarding' => 'Controla o acesso aos fluxos de desligamento.'`. So the offboarding product gating by company uses the ServicePackage. This supports the concern that not all companies necessarily have the offboarding module enabled. Let me read ServicePackage entity quickly, and how product availability is decided in the flow template management (e.g., how templates are created in workflow for a company when product is not allowed). Let me also look at how `ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier` or `WorkflowOrchestratorBuiltinStages` filter by allowed products, plus how company eligibility is computed (e.g., a function hasCompanyProduct/CompanyProductEnabled). Let me search for how product 'offboarding' eligibility per company is verified in creating flow templates or listing automations. Search in the controller that handles the flow templates listing (orquestrador-operacoes). Hmm, that's a big search. Let me instead read ServicePackage entity lines near 'offboarding'.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Entity/ServicePackage.php", "start_line": 1, "end_line": 80}
File: src/Entity/ServicePackage.php (Total lines: 1132)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-80
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Entity;
4|
5|use App\Repository\ServicePackageRepository;
6|use Doctrine\Common\Collections\ArrayCollection;
7|use Doctrine\Common\Collections\Collection;
8|use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
9|
10|/**
11| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass=ServicePackageRepository::class)
12| */
13|class ServicePackage
14|{
15|
16|    /**
17|     * Mapeamento de todas as funcionalidades (features) e suas respectivas limitações no sistema.
18|     * Cada feature possui um identificador único, um rótulo descritivo, uma flag de acesso e, opcionalmente, limitações.
19|     * 
20|     * Importante: Caso uma nova funcionalidade seja adicionada ao sistema, ela deve ser incluída neste mapeamento e na tabela do banco de dados features
21|     * seguindo o mesmo formato, garantindo consistência e centralização das configurações.
22|     */
23|    const FEATURES = [
24|        'membrosEquipes' => [
25|            'label' => 'Membros & Equipes',
26|            'has_access' => 0,
27|            'limitations' => null
28|        ],
29|        'organograma' => [
30|            'label' => 'Organograma',
31|            'has_access' => 0,
32|            'limitations' => null
33|        ],
34|        'engenhariaCargos' => [
35|            'label' => 'Engenharia de Cargos',
36|            'has_access' => 0,
37|            'limitations' => null
38|        ],
39|        'offboarding' => [
40|            'label' => 'Offboarding',
41|            'has_access' => 0,
42|            'limitations' => null
43|        ],
44|        'centroComunicacao' => [
45|            'label' => 'Centro de Comunicação',
46|            'has_access' => 0,
47|            'limitations' => null
48|        ],
49|        'planoDesenvolvimentoIndividual' => [
50|            'label' => 'Plano de Desenvolvimento Individual',
51|            'has_access' => 0,
52|            'limitations' => null
53|        ],
54|        'employeeAdvocacy' => [
55|            'label' => 'Employee Advocacy',
56|            'has_access' => 0,
57|            'limitations' => null
58|        ],
59|        'onboarding' => [
60|            'label' => 'Onboarding',
61|            'has_access' => 0,
62|            'limitations' => [
63|                'max_onboarding_groups' => 0
64|            ]
65|        ],
66|        'recrutamentoSelecao' => [
67|            'label' => 'Recrutamento & Seleção',
68|            'has_access' => 0,
69|            'limitations' => [
70|                'max_process' => 0,
71|                'max_candidates_per_process' => 0
72|            ]
73|        ],
74|        'assessmentProfissional' => [
75|            'label' => 'Assessment Profissional',
76|            'has_access' => 0,
77|            'limitations' => [
78|                'max_assessments' => 0,
79|                'max_candidates_per_assessment' => 0
80|            ]
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "esocialTab|esocial_tab|desligamento", "file_patterns": ["src/Controller/", "templates/company/"]}
No matches found
Request #10 deepseek-v4-flash P:95.64K C:1.69K CR:94.72K CW:0 15823ms
Reasoning
There is a feature/per-package gating via ServicePackage features (offboarding has has_access). So there IS a company entitlement gate concept. Whether the workflow seeding should consider it is a design question. But because the migration seeds products/templates into ALL companies that have the exit workflow regardless of whether offboarding is enabled in the package, we have a legitimate concern worth flagging as a real risk (high or medium). It's mitigated by doc mentioning it as a risk, but the doc says it's "expected". Still, seeding workflows/products on all tenants in production without entitlement filtering is a real tenancy concern. I'll frame it as "Atenção/confirmação" - medium. Actually, let me be careful: The migration only seeds the workflow_products link for product 'offboarding' with order_index 0, plus templates/stages/automations with the action. For clients without offboarding entitlement, the template would be visible and usable, essentially granting feature access via flow. That's a business/security concern (entitlement bypass). Let me check how flow template creation is guarded by service package in normal operation to confirm that creating flow templates for offboarding is gated per-company. Let me search for 'hasFeature' / 'offboarding' package check when creating flow/automation. Search 'NewPackageProductsService' (only shows mapping). Search for where features are enforced for flows, e.g., in WorkflowProductCatalog or flow config controllers; maybe `FeatureAccess`. Let me search 'package' checks for 'offboarding'. Actually, given time constraints and precision over recall, I'll phrase the migration finding as a question/attention item: since the app gates offboarding by company via service package features (ServicePackage FEATURES 'offboarding'), seeding for every tenant with the workflow row can enable the feature for tenants without entitlement; recommend to filter per-company product entitlement or document explicitly why it's intentional and confirm rollback per tenant. Medium severity. Now let me focus on confirming concrete issues to report: **Report 1 (AutomationExecutionService) — Duplicate pendente event when a draft already exists but wasn't created by this automation (e.g., created in the S-2299 tab):** The query for "existing not editable" excludes `pendente` events and the metadata-lookup only matches events previously created by this flow. If a pendente draft already exists for the same dismissal (created manually in the "aba desligamento/eSocial" via saveEventS2299, which uses status 'pendente'), the automation will not find it and will create a second pendente event, violating the claimed idempotency and producing duplicated S-2299 drafts. Recommendation: also search pendente events for the same dismissal (company+worker+remuneracao+dtDeslig) but consider them editable/updated, or include a guard. This is medium. Wait — need to check that saveEventS2299 (manual tab) inserts pendente events and if any code prevents duplicates there. If the UI already prevents duplicates by dismissal date, then a user would never have two pendente events; but the automation path would create a second one. The claim "A automação é idempotente: não deve duplicar evento pendente já existente para o mesmo contexto" explicitly claims it doesn't duplicate pendente events already existing. But the implementation only checks for pendente events linked via metadata (i.e., created by this automation on a prior run). It does NOT check for pendente events created by other means. So the claim in PR description is stronger than implementation. Real gap. Flag medium. **Report 2 (AutomationExecutionService) — Update semantics only fills empty fields:** In 'updated' branch, applyEsocialS2299Payload with onlyEmptyFields=true. So a changed dismissal date (dtDeslig) or motivo in the offboarding will not propagate to the draft; notification says draft was "atualizado" from the offboarding even though stale. Is that a bug or intentional? Because a "draft" may be manually edited by the responsible (user data), and onlyEmptyFields prevents overwrite of user edits. But then they claim automation updates the draft with offboarding data. When offboarding dismissal date changes, the draft should follow? Ambiguous. Since the draft has to be reviewed, maybe non-destructive update is desired to not clobber user's manual edits. I'll consider flagging as low (needs a decision). Might skip to preserve precision. Hmm. Let me think of another concrete bug candidate: **Report 3 — Migration `up()` early return when any workflow table missing:** In Doctrine migrations, if `up()` returns without doing anything (tables missing) but the migration is still recorded as applied. Also for each loop iteration, they `continue` etc. For the partial-failure atomicity concern: they use raw PDO/connection statements not wrapped in transaction; if the process fails midway (e.g., duplicate key, DB connection loss), partial seed remains. When rerun later (migrate again won't rerun because recorded), the operator must manually roll back. But since migration is non-transactional because some tables may be MyISAM or DDL..., still the multi-insert should be transactional via beginTransaction/commit to avoid partial seeds. This is a real risk worth flagging (medium). **Report 4 — down() deletes workflow_products row while instances in progress may reference it; and not considering other templates in same workflow that are inactive.** In the DELETE they only keep the product link if there's an ACTIVE template in the same workflow referencing the product. If another template (e.g., previously existing) that references the product is INACTIVE, the link is removed, which could break references from instances created from that template (flow_instances referencing workflow_product? need FK check). Also if instances in progress belong to the workflow+product but template is_active flag toggled... Hard to verify; but we can check where workflow_products id is referenced. Search for 'workflowProduct' entity. Let me search for entity referencing workflow_products: 'workflow_product' column usage. Let me run a couple of searches: 'flow_instances' columns 'workflow_product_id'? and 'FlowTemplate' or 'WorkflowProduct' entity. Let me focus. I need to check the S-2299 duplicate event more concretely; verify saveEventS2299 (manual UI path) and any pre-existing checks for duplicates. Search in EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository for status 'pendente' query conditions, and how front triggers the automation (multiple runs). Let me also examine whether `mtvDeslig` should be populated from `reason` (offboarding reason). Let me check what the offboarding dismissal reason looks like: the `reason` field. In templates it may be a select with eSocial motivo codes. Let me check the guide `motivo_desligamento.html.twig` or the esocial tab where S-2299 is created; search for 'mtvDeslig' option lists to know if closed list. Search in JS templates for motivo desligamento options e.g., '01' etc. Let me run searches.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "workflow_product", "file_patterns": ["src/Entity/*.php"]}
File: src/Entity/WorkflowProduct.php
Match lines: 2
10| * @ORM\Table(name="workflow_products", uniqueConstraints={
11| *     @ORM\UniqueConstraint(name="unique_workflow_product", columns={"workflow_id", "product_id"})

code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "findOneBy.*companyMember|event.*dtDeslig|dtDeslig.*:.*status|status.*pendente", "file_patterns": ["src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php"], "use_perl_regexp": true}
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
Match lines: 3
73|        $event->setStatus('pendente');
76|        $event->setDtDeslig($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataDesligamento']) ?? null);
117|            'dtDeslig' => $event->getDtDeslig()?->format('Y-m-d'),

Request #11 deepseek-v4-flash P:97.5K C:236 CR:97.28K CW:0 3114ms
Reasoning
The workflow_products table has a unique constraint on (workflow_id, product_id). This means the migration `ensureWorkflowProduct`'s insert could throw a duplicate key if... no, it checks exists first. But in a concurrent run or partial earlier insert (failed mid), insert would throw if row already present but check not done because a previous partial run inserted it. Since ensureWorkflowProduct does an existence check, it's fine. But if two processes run the migration concurrently... improbable. Let me examine the WorkflowProduct entity and FlowTemplate to see FK relationships and whether deleting the workflow_product row cascades to flow_template/instances. And whether the down() in the migration deleting the workflow_products row could cause FK violations. Let me look at the migration's full new file content for exact line references. Let me read the file.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php"}
File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php (Total lines: 441)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-441
1|<?php
2|
3|declare(strict_types=1);
4|
5|namespace DoctrineMigrations;
6|
7|use Doctrine\DBAL\Schema\Schema;
8|use Doctrine\Migrations\AbstractMigration;
9|
10|final class Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate extends AbstractMigration
11|{
12|    private const SEED_KEY = '20260901171000_offboarding_esocial_s2299_flow_template';
13|    private const WORKFLOW_SLUG = 'fluxo-de-saida';
14|    private const TEMPLATE_NAME = 'Offboarding com eSocial (S-2299)';
15|
16|    public function getDescription(): string
17|    {
18|        return 'Cria flow padrão de offboarding com automação de rascunho eSocial S-2299 em workflows de saída existentes.';
19|    }
20|
21|    public function isTransactional(): bool
22|    {
23|        return false;
24|    }
25|
26|    public function up(Schema $schema): void
27|    {
28|        foreach (['company', 'products', 'workflows', 'workflow_products', 'flow_templates', 'flow_template_products', 'flow_stages', 'flow_activities', 'flow_automations'] as $table) {
29|            if (!$this->tableExists($table)) {
30|                return;
31|            }
32|        }
33|
34|        $offboardingProductId = $this->findActiveProductId('offboarding');
35|        if ($offboardingProductId <= 0) {
36|            return;
37|        }
38|
39|        $workflowRows = $this->connection->fetchAllAssociative(
40|            'SELECT id, company_id FROM workflows WHERE slug = :slug',
41|            ['slug' => self::WORKFLOW_SLUG]
42|        );
43|        foreach ($workflowRows as $workflowRow) {
44|            $workflowId = (int) $workflowRow['id'];
45|            $companyId = (int) $workflowRow['company_id'];
46|            if ($workflowId <= 0 || $companyId <= 0) {
47|                continue;
48|            }
49|
50|            $workflowProductExisted = $this->workflowProductExists($workflowId, $offboardingProductId);
51|            $this->ensureWorkflowProduct($workflowId, $offboardingProductId, 0);
52|
53|            $templateId = $this->ensureTemplate($companyId, $workflowId, [
54|                'workflow_product_was_created' => !$workflowProductExisted,
55|            ]);
56|            if ($templateId <= 0) {
57|                continue;
58|            }
59|
60|            $this->ensureTemplateProduct($templateId, $offboardingProductId);
61|            $this->ensureOffboardingStages($templateId, $offboardingProductId);
62|        }
63|    }
64|
65|    public function down(Schema $schema): void
66|    {
67|        if (!$this->tableExists('flow_templates')) {
68|            return;
69|        }
70|
71|        $templateRows = $this->connection->fetchAllAssociative(
72|            'SELECT id, settings FROM flow_templates
73|             WHERE JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, \'$.seed_migration\')) = :seed',
74|            ['seed' => self::SEED_KEY]
75|        );
76|
77|        if ($templateRows === []) {
78|            return;
79|        }
80|
81|        $offboardingProductId = $this->tableExists('products')
82|            ? (int) ($this->connection->fetchOne('SELECT id FROM products WHERE slug = :slug LIMIT 1', ['slug' => 'offboarding']) ?: 0)
83|            : 0;
84|
85|        foreach ($templateRows as $templateRow) {
86|            $templateId = (int) $templateRow['id'];
87|            if ($templateId <= 0) {
88|                continue;
89|            }
90|
91|            $settings = json_decode((string) ($templateRow['settings'] ?? '{}'), true);
92|            if (!is_array($settings)) {
93|                $settings = [];
94|            }
95|
96|            if (
97|                $offboardingProductId > 0
98|                && ($settings['workflow_product_was_created'] ?? false) === true
99|                && $this->tableExists('workflow_products')
100|                && $this->tableExists('flow_template_products')
101|            ) {
102|                $this->connection->executeStatement(
103|                    'DELETE wp FROM workflow_products wp
104|                     WHERE wp.product_id = :productId
105|                       AND wp.workflow_id = (
106|                           SELECT ft.workflow_id
107|                           FROM flow_templates ft
108|                           WHERE ft.id = :templateId
109|                       )
110|                       AND NOT EXISTS (
111|                           SELECT 1
112|                           FROM flow_templates active_ft
113|                           INNER JOIN flow_template_products active_ftp ON active_ftp.flow_template_id = active_ft.id
114|                           WHERE active_ft.workflow_id = wp.workflow_id
115|                             AND active_ftp.product_id = wp.product_id
116|                             AND active_ft.is_active = 1
117|                             AND active_ft.id <> :templateId
118|                       )',
119|                    ['templateId' => $templateId, 'productId' => $offboardingProductId]
120|                );
121|            }
122|
123|            unset($settings['seed_migration']);
124|            $settings['seed_migration_rolled_back'] = self::SEED_KEY;
125|
126|            $this->connection->executeStatement(
127|                'UPDATE flow_templates
128|                 SET is_active = 0, settings = :settings, updated_at = NOW()
129|                 WHERE id = :templateId',
130|                [
131|                    'templateId' => $templateId,
132|                    'settings' => json_encode($settings, JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
133|                ]
134|            );
135|        }
136|    }
137|
138|    private function findActiveProductId(string $slug): int
139|    {
140|        return (int) ($this->connection->fetchOne(
141|            'SELECT id FROM products WHERE slug = :slug AND active = 1 LIMIT 1',
142|            ['slug' => $slug]
143|        ) ?: 0);
144|    }
145|
146|    private function ensureWorkflowProduct(int $workflowId, int $productId, int $orderIndex): void
147|    {
148|        $exists = (int) ($this->connection->fetchOne(
149|            'SELECT id FROM workflow_products WHERE workflow_id = :workflowId AND product_id = :productId LIMIT 1',
150|            ['workflowId' => $workflowId, 'productId' => $productId]
151|        ) ?: 0);
152|
153|        if ($exists > 0) {
154|            $this->connection->executeStatement(
155|                'UPDATE workflow_products SET order_index = :orderIndex WHERE id = :id',
156|                ['orderIndex' => $orderIndex, 'id' => $exists]
157|            );
158|            return;
159|        }
160|
161|        $this->connection->executeStatement(
162|            'INSERT INTO workflow_products (workflow_id, product_id, order_index)
163|             VALUES (:workflowId, :productId, :orderIndex)',
164|            ['workflowId' => $workflowId, 'productId' => $productId, 'orderIndex' => $orderIndex]
165|        );
166|    }
167|
168|    /**
169|     * @param array{workflow_product_was_created: bool} $rollbackState
170|     */
171|    private function ensureTemplate(int $companyId, int $workflowId, array $rollbackState): int
172|    {
173|        $templateId = (int) ($this->connection->fetchOne(
174|            'SELECT id FROM flow_templates
175|             WHERE workflow_id = :workflowId
176|               AND JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, \'$.seed_migration\')) = :seed
177|             LIMIT 1',
178|            ['workflowId' => $workflowId, 'seed' => self::SEED_KEY]
179|        ) ?: 0);
180|
181|        if ($templateId > 0) {
182|            return $templateId;
183|        }
184|
185|        $settings = json_encode([
186|            'seed_migration' => self::SEED_KEY,
187|            'preset' => 'offboarding_esocial_s2299',
188|            'modules' => ['offboarding' => true, 'esocial_s2299' => true],
189|            'workflow_product_was_created' => $rollbackState['workflow_product_was_created'],
190|        ], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE);
191|
192|        $this->connection->executeStatement(
193|            'INSERT INTO flow_templates (workflow_id, company_id, name, description, is_active, settings, template_category, created_at, updated_at)
194|             VALUES (:workflowId, :companyId, :name, :description, 1, :settings, :category, NOW(), NOW())',
195|            [
196|                'workflowId' => $workflowId,
197|                'companyId' => $companyId,
198|                'name' => self::TEMPLATE_NAME,
199|                'description' => 'Flow padrão de offboarding com etapas customizáveis e criação do rascunho eSocial S-2299 na etapa final.',
200|                'settings' => $settings,
201|                'category' => 'offboarding_esocial',
202|            ]
203|        );
204|
205|        return (int) $this->connection->lastInsertId();
206|    }
207|
208|    private function ensureTemplateProduct(int $templateId, int $productId): void
209|    {
210|        $exists = (int) ($this->connection->fetchOne(
211|            'SELECT id FROM flow_template_products
212|             WHERE flow_template_id = :templateId AND product_id = :productId AND slot_index = 0
213|             LIMIT 1',
214|            ['templateId' => $templateId, 'productId' => $productId]
215|        ) ?: 0);
216|
217|        if ($exists > 0) {
218|            $this->connection->executeStatement(
219|                'UPDATE flow_template_products
220|                 SET order_index = 0, template_type = :templateType
221|                 WHERE id = :id',
222|                ['id' => $exists, 'templateType' => 'fixo']
223|            );
224|            return;
225|        }
226|
227|        $this->connection->executeStatement(
228|            'INSERT INTO flow_template_products (flow_template_id, product_id, order_index, template_type, slot_index)
229|             VALUES (:templateId, :productId, 0, :templateType, 0)',
230|            ['templateId' => $templateId, 'productId' => $productId, 'templateType' => 'fixo']
231|        );
232|    }
233|
234|    private function workflowProductExists(int $workflowId, int $productId): bool
235|    {
236|        return (int) ($this->connection->fetchOne(
237|            'SELECT id FROM workflow_products WHERE workflow_id = :workflowId AND product_id = :productId LIMIT 1',
238|            ['workflowId' => $workflowId, 'productId' => $productId]
239|        ) ?: 0) > 0;
240|    }
241|
242|    private function ensureOffboardingStages(int $templateId, int $productId): void
243|    {
244|        $stages = [
245|            [
246|                'name' => 'Etapa 1 - Preparação',
247|                'description' => 'Etapa inicial de preparação do desligamento com comunicações e documentação necessária.',
248|                'orderIndex' => 1,
249|                'automations' => [
250|                    [
251|                        'name' => 'Notificar responsável do fluxo',
252|                        'triggerType' => 'on_enter',
253|                        'actionType' => 'send_email_flow_responsible',
254|                        'actionConfig' => ['to' => 'flow_responsible', 'template' => 'offboarding_stage_enter'],
255|                        'conditions' => [['type' => 'on_enter', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0]],
256|                        'actions' => [['type' => 'send_email', 'config' => ['to' => 'flow_responsible', 'template' => 'offboarding_stage_enter'], 'orderIndex' => 0]],
257|                        'orderIndex' => 0,
258|                    ],
259|                ],
260|            ],
261|            [
262|                'name' => 'Etapa 2 - Transição',
263|                'description' => 'Etapa de transição de responsabilidades e devolução de equipamentos.',
264|                'orderIndex' => 2,
265|                'automations' => [
266|                    [
267|                        'name' => 'Avançar ao concluir 100% das atividades',
268|                        'triggerType' => 'on_all_activities_complete',
269|                        'actionType' => 'stage_change',
270|                        'actionConfig' => [],
271|                        'conditions' => [['type' => 'on_all_activities_complete', 'config' => ['value' => 100], 'orderIndex' => 0]],
272|                        'actions' => [['type' => 'stage_change', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0]],
273|                        'orderIndex' => 0,
274|                    ],
275|                ],
276|            ],
277|            [
278|                'name' => 'Etapa 3 - Finalização',
279|                'description' => 'Etapa de finalização com entrevista de desligamento, procedimentos finais e preparação do evento eSocial S-2299.',
280|                'orderIndex' => 3,
281|                'automations' => [
282|                    [
283|                        'name' => 'Criar Processo Seletivo ao concluir offboarding',
284|                        'triggerType' => 'on_offboarding_complete',
285|                        'actionType' => 'create_processo_seletivo',
286|                        'actionConfig' => [],
287|                        'conditions' => [['type' => 'on_offboarding_complete', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0]],
288|                        'actions' => [['type' => 'create_processo_seletivo', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0]],
289|                        'orderIndex' => 0,
290|                    ],
291|                    [
292|                        'name' => 'Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299) ao entrar na etapa final',
293|                        'triggerType' => 'on_enter',
294|                        'actionType' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
295|                        'actionConfig' => [
296|                            'to' => 'flow_responsible',
297|                            '_default_automation_id' => 'offboarding_esocial_s2299_draft_on_final_stage_enter',
298|                        ],
299|                        'conditions' => [['type' => 'on_enter', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0]],
300|                        'actions' => [[
301|                            'type' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
302|                            'config' => [
303|                                'to' => 'flow_responsible',
304|                                '_default_automation_id' => 'offboarding_esocial_s2299_draft_on_final_stage_enter',
305|                            ],
306|                            'orderIndex' => 0,
307|                        ]],
308|                        'orderIndex' => 1,
309|                    ],
310|                ],
311|            ],
312|        ];
313|
314|        foreach ($stages as $stage) {
315|            $stageId = $this->ensureStage($templateId, $productId, $stage);
316|            if ($stageId <= 0) {
317|                continue;
318|            }
319|
320|            $this->ensureActivity($stageId);
321|
322|            foreach ($stage['automations'] as $automation) {
323|                $this->ensureAutomation($stageId, $automation);
324|            }
325|        }
326|    }
327|
328|    /**
329|     * @param array{name: string, description: string, orderIndex: int} $stage
330|     */
331|    private function ensureStage(int $templateId, int $productId, array $stage): int
332|    {
333|        $stageId = (int) ($this->connection->fetchOne(
334|            'SELECT id
335|             FROM flow_stages
336|             WHERE flow_template_id = :templateId
337|               AND product_id = :productId
338|               AND product_slot_index IS NULL
339|               AND LOWER(name) = LOWER(:name)
340|             LIMIT 1',
341|            [
342|                'templateId' => $templateId,
343|                'productId' => $productId,
344|                'name' => $stage['name'],
345|            ]
346|        ) ?: 0);
347|
348|        if ($stageId > 0) {
349|            return $stageId;
350|        }
351|
352|        $this->connection->executeStatement(
353|            'INSERT INTO flow_stages (flow_template_id, product_id, name, description, order_index, advance_rules, stage_category, phase_number, product_slot_index)
354|             VALUES (:templateId, :productId, :name, :description, :orderIndex, :advanceRules, NULL, NULL, NULL)',
355|            [
356|                'templateId' => $templateId,
357|                'productId' => $productId,
358|                'name' => $stage['name'],
359|                'description' => $stage['description'],
360|                'orderIndex' => (int) $stage['orderIndex'],
361|                'advanceRules' => json_encode([], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
362|            ]
363|        );
364|
365|        return (int) $this->connection->lastInsertId();
366|    }
367|
368|    private function ensureActivity(int $stageId): void
369|    {
370|        $exists = (int) ($this->connection->fetchOne(
371|            'SELECT id FROM flow_activities WHERE flow_stage_id = :stageId AND name = :name LIMIT 1',
372|            ['stageId' => $stageId, 'name' => 'Offboarding']
373|        ) ?: 0);
374|
375|        if ($exists > 0) {
376|            return;
377|        }
378|
379|        $this->connection->executeStatement(
380|            'INSERT INTO flow_activities (flow_stage_id, name, activity_type, config, order_index, process_stage_type, onboarding_activity_type_id, offboarding_activity_type_id)
381|             VALUES (:stageId, :name, :activityType, :config, 1, NULL, NULL, NULL)',
382|            [
383|                'stageId' => $stageId,
384|                'name' => 'Offboarding',
385|                'activityType' => 'activity',
386|                'config' => json_encode(['icon' => 'fa-regular fa-file-lines'], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
387|            ]
388|        );
389|    }
390|
391|    /**
392|     * @param array{name: string, triggerType: string, actionType: string, actionConfig: array<string, mixed>, conditions: array<int, mixed>, actions: array<int, mixed>, orderIndex: int} $automation
393|     */
394|    private function ensureAutomation(int $stageId, array $automation): void
395|    {
396|        $exists = (int) ($this->connection->fetchOne(
397|            'SELECT id
398|             FROM flow_automations
399|             WHERE flow_stage_id = :stageId
400|               AND name = :name
401|               AND trigger_type = :triggerType
402|               AND action_type = :actionType
403|             LIMIT 1',
404|            [
405|                'stageId' => $stageId,
406|                'name' => $automation['name'],
407|                'triggerType' => $automation['triggerType'],
408|                'actionType' => $automation['actionType'],
409|            ]
410|        ) ?: 0);
411|
412|        if ($exists > 0) {
413|            return;
414|        }
415|
416|        $this->connection->executeStatement(
417|            'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, fixed_stage_type, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index)
418|             VALUES (:stageId, NULL, NULL, :name, :triggerType, :actionType, :actionConfig, :conditions, :actions, 1, :orderIndex)',
419|            [
420|                'stageId' => $stageId,
421|                'name' => $automation['name'],
422|                'triggerType' => $automation['triggerType'],
423|                'actionType' => $automation['actionType'],
424|                'actionConfig' => json_encode($automation['actionConfig'], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
425|                'conditions' => json_encode($automation['conditions'], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
426|                'actions' => json_encode($automation['actions'], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
427|                'orderIndex' => (int) $automation['orderIndex'],
428|            ]
429|        );
430|    }
431|
432|    private function tableExists(string $tableName): bool
433|    {
434|        $schemaManager = method_exists($this->connection, 'createSchemaManager')
435|            ? $this->connection->createSchemaManager()
436|            : $this->connection->getSchemaManager();
437|
438|        return $schemaManager->tablesExist([$tableName]);
439|    }
440|}
441|
Request #12 deepseek-v4-flash P:103K C:192 CR:97.66K CW:0 2333ms
Reasoning
Now let me examine the `WorkflowProduct` entity and `FlowTemplate` to see relationships with `workflow_products`. Specifically, does FlowTemplate have a FK to workflow_products? Look at flow_templates columns: workflow_id, company_id. And `workflow_products` is a table with workflow_id, product_id. Deleting a workflow_products row in down() could break nothing because instances probably don't reference workflow_products. Let me read WorkflowProduct entity to confirm only these two FKs.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Entity/WorkflowProduct.php"}
File: src/Entity/WorkflowProduct.php (Total lines: 79)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-79
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Entity;
4|
5|use App\Repository\WorkflowProductRepository;
6|use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
7|
8|/**
9| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass=WorkflowProductRepository::class)
10| * @ORM\Table(name="workflow_products", uniqueConstraints={
11| *     @ORM\UniqueConstraint(name="unique_workflow_product", columns={"workflow_id", "product_id"})
12| * })
13| */
14|class WorkflowProduct
15|{
16|    /**
17|     * @ORM\Id
18|     * @ORM\GeneratedValue
19|     * @ORM\Column(type="integer")
20|     */
21|    private $id;
22|
23|    /**
24|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity=Workflow::class, inversedBy="workflowProducts")
25|     * @ORM\JoinColumn(nullable=false, onDelete="CASCADE")
26|     */
27|    private $workflow;
28|
29|    /**
30|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity=Product::class)
31|     * @ORM\JoinColumn(nullable=false, onDelete="CASCADE")
32|     */
33|    private $product;
34|
35|    /**
36|     * @ORM\Column(type="integer")
37|     */
38|    private int $orderIndex = 0;
39|
40|    public function getId(): ?int
41|    {
42|        return $this->id;
43|    }
44|
45|    public function getWorkflow(): ?Workflow
46|    {
47|        return $this->workflow;
48|    }
49|
50|    public function setWorkflow(?Workflow $workflow): self
51|    {
52|        $this->workflow = $workflow;
53|        return $this;
54|    }
55|
56|    public function getProduct(): ?Product
57|    {
58|        return $this->product;
59|    }
60|
61|    public function setProduct(?Product $product): self
62|    {
63|        $this->product = $product;
64|        return $this;
65|    }
66|
67|    public function getOrderIndex(): int
68|    {
69|        return $this->orderIndex;
70|    }
71|
72|    public function setOrderIndex(int $orderIndex): self
73|    {
74|        $this->orderIndex = $orderIndex;
75|        return $this;
76|    }
77|}
78|
79|
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "seed_migration"}
File: docs/JORNADA_METAHUMAN_INICIAR_PLANO.md
Match lines: 2
37|    'seed_migration'   => self::CURRENT_SEED_MIGRATION, // ID da migration atual
53|- [ ] Incluir `'seed_migration'` com o ID da migration atual (para `down()` conseguir identificar e deletar)

File: docs/database-changes/2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template.md
Match lines: 1
58|O `DOWN` nao remove fisicamente os templates marcados com `settings.seed_migration = 20260901171000_offboarding_esocial_s2299_flow_template`. Ele desativa o template, remove o marcador `seed_migration` e grava `seed_migration_rolled_back`, preservando etapas, atividades, automacoes e vinculos do template para nao apagar instancias/processos em andamento por cascata.

File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php
Match lines: 8
618|                       AND JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, \'$.seed_migration\')) = :seed
644|                            'seed_migration'                   => self::JOURNEY_SEED_KEY,
810|                       AND JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(ft.settings, \'$.seed_migration\')) = :seed
852|                    'seed_migration'          => self::JOURNEY_SEED_KEY,
861|                'meta'   => json_encode(['seed_migration' => self::JOURNEY_SEED_KEY, 'journeyCode' => $journeyCode, 'source' => 'journey_products_plan_seed'], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
1224|                   AND JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, \'$.seed_migration\')) = :seed
1247|                        'seed_migration'                   => self::JOURNEY_PADRAO_KEY,
1306|                       AND JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, \'$.seed_migration\')) = :seed

File: migrations/Version20260519155647.php
Match lines: 2
35|        $key = CicloInicialEssencialTemplateMaterializer::SEED_MIGRATION_KEY;
47|               AND JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, '$.seed_migration')) = :key",

File: migrations/Version20260519173602.php
Match lines: 3
52|                   AND JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, \'$.seed_migration\')) = :seed
59|                    'seed_migration' => self::SEED_KEY,
88|             WHERE JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, \'$.seed_migration\')) = :seed',

File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
Match lines: 5
73|             WHERE JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, \'$.seed_migration\')) = :seed',
123|            unset($settings['seed_migration']);
124|            $settings['seed_migration_rolled_back'] = self::SEED_KEY;
176|               AND JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, \'$.seed_migration\')) = :seed
186|            'seed_migration' => self::SEED_KEY,

File: src/MigrationHelper/CicloInicialEssencialTemplateMaterializer.php
Match lines: 6
19|    public const SEED_MIGRATION_KEY = '20260519155647';
67|        $template->setSetting('seed_migration', self::SEED_MIGRATION_KEY);
83|               AND JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, '$.seed_migration')) = :key",
84|            ['key' => self::SEED_MIGRATION_KEY],
125|            $seedMigration = (string) $template->getSetting('seed_migration', '');
126|            if ($seedMigration === self::SEED_MIGRATION_KEY) {

Request #13 deepseek-v4-flash P:104.71K C:184 CR:103.17K CW:0 2671ms
Reasoning
Let me check how other seed migrations handle transactions/idempotency to compare patterns. Let me look at Version20260518151423 (large) which likely seeds many templates. Also check the "seed only for companies with..." pattern used in existing seeds to see whether there's an existing per-company eligibility check that the new migration should mirror. Let me look at an existing seed migration's `up()` and how it iterates over workflows and per company product eligibility. Let me read a portion of Version20260518151423 and Version20260519173602.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read_diff
Show Details
{"path_array": ["migrations/Version20260518151423.php", "migrations/Version20260519173602.php"]}
Error: diff not found for the requested paths
Request #14 deepseek-v4-flash P:104.91K C:118 CR:104.83K CW:0 2167ms
Reasoning
Let me read a couple of lines of one migration to check transaction patterns quickly. Read Version20260518151423 from lines 1-120.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "migrations/Version20260518151423.php", "start_line": 1, "end_line": 80}
File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php (Total lines: 1558)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-80
1|<?php
2|
3|declare(strict_types=1);
4|
5|namespace DoctrineMigrations;
6|
7|use Doctrine\DBAL\Schema\Schema;
8|use Doctrine\Migrations\AbstractMigration;
9|
10|/**
11| * Unified BPM/Decision System setup migration.
12| *
13| * Consolidates ~40 individual BPM/workflow migrations + manual DB operations into
14| * a single idempotent migration. Safe to run on new or partially-migrated databases.
15| *
16| * Covers:
17| *  - Schema changes: process, process_stage, goal, flow_*, workflows,
18| *                    onboarding/offboarding, chat_conversation, crm, communication_center_demand
19| *  - New tables: crm_funnel_steps, flow_automation_requests, onboarding_step_activity (IF NOT EXISTS)
20| *  - Data fix: user_invitation.extra_info invalid JSON
21| *  - Constraint fix: flow_template_products unique index (allow same product in multiple slots)
22| *  - Seeds: workflow_products table, default workflows (5 types per company),
23| *           Jornada Metahuman templates J1-J10, flow_instances J1-J10
24| *
25| * Replaces (in order):
26| *  Version20260130204500, Version20260211190000, Version20260227120000,
27| *  Version20260325160042, Version20260326203854, Version20260413145405,
28| *  Version20260413145408, Version20251219202630, Version20251222154719,
29| *  Version20251222184056, Version20251222230600, Version20260106181323,
30| *  Version20260112193740, Version20260113120000, Version20260113130000,
31| *  Version20260113150000, Version20260120163000, Version20260122224356,
32| *  Version20260128124301, Version20260204122822, Version20260206180000,
33| *  Version20260208042837, Version20260209010000, Version20260210120000,
34| *  Version20260212100000, Version20260224135025, Version20260225100000,
35| *  Version20260226170000, Version20260305120000, Version20260305130000,
36| *  Version20260305140000, Version20260309120000, Version20260318120000,
37| *  Version20260418200000, Version20260423200133, Version20260506200735,
38| *  Version20260506202222, Version20260506204614, Version20260507204422,
39| *  Version20260511155430
40| */
41|/**
42| * Auto-generated Migration: Please modify to your needs!
43| */
44|final class Version20260518151423 extends AbstractMigration
45|{
46|    private const JOURNEY_SEED_KEY    = '20260506202222';
47|    private const JOURNEY_PADRAO_KEY  = '20260423200133';
48|    private const JOURNEY_PRODUCTS_KEY = '20260506204614';
49|    private const JOURNEY_INSTANCE_KEY_J6_J10 = '20260507204422';
50|    private const JOURNEY_INSTANCE_KEY_J1_J5  = '20260511155430';
51|
52|    public function getDescription(): string
53|    {
54|        return 'Unified BPM setup: schema + constraint fix + data fix + default workflows + Jornada Metahuman J1-J10 templates and instances.';
55|    }
56|
57|    public function isTransactional(): bool
58|    {
59|        return false;
60|    }
61|
62|    // -------------------------------------------------------------------------
63|    // UP
64|    // -------------------------------------------------------------------------
65|
66|    public function up(Schema $schema): void
67|    {
68|        $this->applySchemaChanges();
69|        $this->fixConstraints();
70|        $this->fixDataIssues();
71|        $this->ensureWorkflowProductsTable();
72|        $this->seedRequiredProducts();
73|        $this->seedDefaultWorkflows();
74|        $this->seedJornadaMetahumanTemplates();
75|        $this->seedJornadaMetahumanPadrao();
76|        $this->seedFlowInstances();
77|        $this->adjustProductsPerJourney();
78|        $this->enrichFlowInstanceConfigs();
79|    }
80|
Request #15 deepseek-v4-flash P:106.12K C:1.21K CR:104.96K CW:0 10822ms
Reasoning
Existing seed migrations also use isTransactional false, so the pattern of non-transactional seeds is established. It weakens the "should be transactional" claim, but partial-failure risk stands; still this codebase pattern accepts it. Maybe report as low/attention. Actually, since other seed migrations are also non-transactional, I'd downgrade issue #4 (not unique to this PR). But I can still note that early-return when table missing silently marks migration as applied, though docs said envs without workflow tables skip. That's intentional and documented. Given precision over recall, I should focus on the most real and verifiable findings. Let me carefully analyze the automation service code once more for actual bugs: 1. **Bug candidate A: Duplicate pendente events** — when existing pendente event not created by automation. Let me check the manual tab flow saveEventS2299 — status 'pendente'. And any dedup? none in repository. But is there any uniqueness preventing multiple pendente? Not in the entity. So there may already be manual duplicates. The automation's own query `findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal` filters `status != 'pendente'`, specifically to avoid matching its own created events. But events created via UI also are 'pendente', and if a user already opened S-2299 tab and clicked save (creating a pendente event), then final stage entry triggers automation and creates a second. That's plausible because the responsibility for reviewing/filling the S-2299 tab presumably happens at the final stage — the responsible may have pre-filled it. Even more: In test step 5 of the PR instructions, they create the flow and the automation creates the draft event. Fine. But consider an offboarding where the user used the manual S-2299 tab BEFORE reaching the final stage, then automation runs — duplicate. That's a real risk. Worth flagging medium. 2. **Bug candidate B: metadata `eventId` is stale after re-run because it's only stored in `sourceMetadata` after creation; the `findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding` uses `empty($draftMetadata['eventId'])`. But then `eventId` is set only for events with an instance. Fine. 3. **Bug candidate C:** Notice in `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, after `persist($event)` and first flush, they later read `$member->getSourceMetadata()` — that is the in-memory array they set before the first flush. But wait: they call `$member->setSourceMetadata($metadata)` with eventId null (event just created, id not yet available). Then flush() persists member + event (event id assigned). Then re-read `$member->getSourceMetadata() ?? []` from the *in-memory entity* — still the array with eventId null? Actually yes, in-memory still contains the array with eventId null because nothing re-set it. Then they set eventId. OK that's fine. 4. **Bug candidate D:** The event is persisted with `$event->setUpdatedAt(...)` only in the 'updated' case; created case doesn't set updatedAt. Not critical. 5. **Bug candidate E:** applyEsocialS2299Payload passes `$eventStatus === 'updated'` as $onlyEmptyFields. Wait actually for 'created' it passes false. For 'updated' true. If the existing pendente event already had dtDeslig equal to the current dismissal date (same run previously), updating would not change fields except filling empties. As discussed. Let me carefully compare with canonical saveEventS2299 to see which setter differences matter: In the new code, `booleanStringOrNull` converts 'avisoPrevioIndenizado' to 'S'/'N' as string for `indPagtoApi` (length=1). In canonical, `setIndPagtoApi($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N')`. Similar. For pensAlim: entity column type integer; new code `intOrNull`. Canonical setPensAlim($data['pensAlim'] ?? null). fine. Now in the earlier commit e0765bd, they changed percAliment/vrAlim to string types. Actually the entity changed those getters/setters from int to string in this PR. And the DB column is decimal(10,2). decimalOrNull returns '0.00' formatted string. That's compatible. Now, one important note: since `mtvDeslig` expects 2-char codes but `buildEsocialS2299DraftPayload` just maps config's motivo free-text into it. But also, more importantly, there is no mapping from offboarding `reason` to motivo; but reason is stored under `_offboarding`. Then when the responsible opens the draft to review... Hmm. Let me look at what mtvDeslig closed list looks like in the UI and what the offboarding reason list looks like, to assess whether offboarding reason is text or code. Let me search templates for reason options in offboarding member guide (motivo_desligamento.html.twig) — the template handles "S-2299 official creation" and includes motivo desligamento select. Let me search 'mtvDeslig' in templates/company.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "mtvDeslig|motivo_desligamento|dataDesligamento", "file_patterns": ["templates/", "src/"]}
No matches found
Request #16 deepseek-v4-flash P:107.34K C:96 CR:107.26K CW:0 2217ms
Reasoning
Hmm, the search found no matches (weird, since motivo_desligamento.html.twig exists). Perhaps search_text had accented characters issue or the tool limit. Let me try searching 'motivoDesligamento'.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "motivoDesligamento"}
File: public/js/offboarding/visualizar_atividades.js
Match lines: 5
43|        ['inputMotivoDesligamento', 'inputCartaDesligamento'].forEach(id => {
50|        document.getElementById('inputMotivoDesligamento').value = data.reason || '';
55|        ['inputMotivoDesligamento', 'inputCartaDesligamento'].forEach(id => {
82|        const motivo = document.getElementById('inputMotivoDesligamento').value.trim();
87|            document.getElementById('inputMotivoDesligamento')?.focus();

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
75|        $event->setMtvDeslig($data['motivoDesligamento'] ?? null);

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2399EvtTsvTerminoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
76|        $event->setMtvDesligTsv($data['motivoDesligamento']);

File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 2
15147|            'motivoDesligamento' => $config['motivoDesligamento'] ?? $config['mtvDeslig'] ?? '',
15283|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getMtvDeslig(), fn ($value) => $event->setMtvDeslig($value), $this->stringOrNull($payload['motivoDesligamento'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial/desligamento.html.twig
Match lines: 1
231|        motivoDesligamento: document.getElementById("motivoDesligamento")?.value || "",

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial/desligamento_termino.html.twig
Match lines: 1
181|            motivoDesligamento: document.getElementById("termino-motivoDesligamento")?.value || "",

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_desligamento/motivo_desligamento.html.twig
Match lines: 2
7|    <label for="motivoDesligamento">Motivo do Desligamento</label>
8|    <select class="form-control" id="motivoDesligamento" name="motivoDesligamento" required>

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig
Match lines: 2
10|    <label for="termino-motivoDesligamento">Motivo do Desligamento <span class="text-danger">*</span></label>
11|    <select class="form-control" id="termino-motivoDesligamento" name="termino-motivoDesligamento" required>

File: templates/offboarding/modals/modalSolicitarDesligamento.html.twig
Match lines: 1
13|            <textarea id="inputMotivoDesligamento"

Request #17 deepseek-v4-flash P:108.11K C:489 CR:107.39K CW:0 4805ms
Reasoning
The motivoDesligamento in the esocial guide is a `<select>` — a closed list of eSocial codes (like "01" etc.). The offboarding modal reason is free text (textarea). The draft creation payload just reads the config's motivo value, which in the seed automation is empty. It does not attempt to convert the offboarding reason to an eSocial code. It also does not validate the motivo value is a 2-char code. But note: the automation's purpose is "Cria ou atualiza o rascunho do evento S-2299 com dados do offboarding e notifica o responsável para revisar". The actual S-2299 fields that come from offboarding data: dtDeslig (dismissal date). Others require the responsible to fill in the tab. If only date is filled, then draft is basically just skeleton with dismissal date and mostly null fields. Then responsible must still fill in motivo etc. So the "rascunho pré-preenchido" is limited. That's acceptable as a draft. Actually, wait: If esocialTrabalhador data exists and remuneracao exists, the code creates an actual `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` row with status 'pendente'. This row is a "draft" for the official eSocial. But other UI logic might pick up pendente events and include them for transmission? Let's check how events get transmitted — batch sending status 'pendente' events could push an incomplete draft (mtvDeslig null) to eSocial, causing errors. Search for where events with status 'pendente' are gathered for transmission, e.g., in Esocial service, 'pendente' query. Let me search for `'pendente'` usage to see if pendente events are queued for transmission automatically.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "status.*pendente|'pendente'", "file_patterns": ["src/Service/", "src/Repository/", "src/Command/"], "use_perl_regexp": true}
Note: The results have been truncated. Only showing first 100 results.
File: src/Command/CreatePitchTaskCommand.php
Match lines: 1
92|                $status = $task->getRealizado() ? '✅ Concluída' : '⏳ Pendente';

File: src/Command/ProcessPendingCnabReturnsCommand.php
Match lines: 1
23|    description: 'Processa arquivos de retorno CNAB com status importado (retornos e pagamentos pendentes)',

File: src/Repository/EsocialS1000EvtInfoEmpregadorRepository.php
Match lines: 1
97|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS1005EvtTabEstabRepository.php
Match lines: 1
106|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS1010EvtTabRubricaRepository.php
Match lines: 1
86|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS1020EvtTabLotacaoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
78|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS1070EvtTabProcessoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
73|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS1200EvtRemunRepository.php
Match lines: 1
71|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS1210EvtPgtosRepository.php
Match lines: 1
82|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS1280EvtInfoComplPerRepository.php
Match lines: 1
64|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS1298EvtReabreEvPerRepository.php
Match lines: 1
63|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS1299EvtFechaEvPerRepository.php
Match lines: 1
64|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2190EvtAdmPrelimRepository.php
Match lines: 1
65|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2200EvtAdmissaoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
65|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2205EvtAltCadastralRepository.php
Match lines: 1
61|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2206EvtAltContratualRepository.php
Match lines: 1
60|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2210EvtCATRepository.php
Match lines: 1
70|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2220EvtMonitRepository.php
Match lines: 1
74|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2221EvtExmToxMotRepository.php
Match lines: 1
69|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2230EvtAfastTempRepository.php
Match lines: 1
69|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2240EvtExpRiscoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
74|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2298EvtReintegrRepository.php
Match lines: 1
71|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
73|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2300EvtTsvInicioRepository.php
Match lines: 1
63|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2306EvtTsvAltContrRepository.php
Match lines: 1
68|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2399EvtTsvTerminoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
73|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2500EvtProcTrabRepository.php
Match lines: 1
57|            $evento->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2501EvtContProcRepository.php
Match lines: 1
79|            $evento->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS3000EvtExclusaoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
61|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/EsocialS3500EvtExcProcTrabRepository.php
Match lines: 1
61|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Repository/SpecialistRepository.php
Match lines: 2
81|            ->setParameter('statusRecadastro', '%"' . $type . '":' . Specialist::STATUS_RECADASTRO_PENDENTE . '%')
94|            ->setParameter('status', 'Pendente')

File: src/Service/Ata/Preview/AtaRefundPreviewService.php
Match lines: 1
42|                $recibo = !empty($r['link_recibo']) ? 'ok' : 'pendente';

File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 16
642|                (string) ($validation['statusKey'] ?? 'pendente'),
651|            'statusKey' => (string) ($validation['statusKey'] ?? 'pendente'),
652|            'statusLabel' => (string) ($validation['statusLabel'] ?? 'Pendente'),
1437|                'pendente'
1514|        $statusKey = (string) ($validation['statusKey'] ?? 'pendente');
1548|            $statusKey === 'erro' ? 'Erro na resposta do eSocial' : 'Resposta do eSocial pendente',
1766|                        ? sprintf('%s ainda não está enviado/processado. Status atual: %s', $code, $rawStatus !== '' ? $rawStatus : 'pendente')
1844|        $statusKey = $ready ? 'enviado' : 'pendente';
1955|        return 'pendente';
1966|            default => trim($rawStatus) !== '' ? trim($rawStatus) : 'Pendente',
2066|        string $statusKey = 'pendente',
2091|        string $statusKey = 'pendente'
2095|        $statusKey = trim($statusKey) !== '' ? trim($statusKey) : 'pendente';
14984|                    if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $event->getStatus() !== 'pendente') {
15231|            ->setParameter('pendingStatus', 'pendente')
15275|        $event->setStatus('pendente');

File: src/Service/CalendarEventMapperService.php
Match lines: 1
1068|            \App\Entity\SpaceBooking::STATUS_PENDING => 'Pendente',

File: src/Service/CalendarMemberGenerator.php
Match lines: 2
1006|            1 => 'Pendente',
1040|            'status' => $statusMap[$task->getStatus()] ?? 'Pendente',

File: src/Service/Chat/ChatDataSourceService.php
Match lines: 1
513|                $status = 'Pendente';

File: src/Service/ChatMarkerMemberService.php
Match lines: 7
1259|                        ELSE 'pendente'
1279|                    'pendente' as status
1301|                        ELSE 'pendente'
1340|                            $priority = ['concluida' => 3, 'em_andamento' => 2, 'pendente' => 1];
1569|                    $statusLabel = 'pendente';
1774|                1 => 'pendente',
2084|                        'pendente' => '⏺️',

File: src/Service/CognitiveAssessmentService.php
Match lines: 1
5917|                'description' => 'Manifesta-se como desejo insaciável por mais recursos, status ou poder, independentemente de necessidades reais. Pode levar a escolhas de curto prazo que comprometem sustentabilidade.'

File: src/Service/Effectiveness/Behavioral/BehavioralActionNormalizer.php
Match lines: 1
650|                'status_label' => $isEvaluated ? 'Avaliada' : 'Pendente',

File: src/Service/Effectiveness/Grc/GrcActionNormalizer.php
Match lines: 1
359|            GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_PENDENTE => 'Pendente de validação',

File: src/Service/Effectiveness/Grc/GrcOriginConditionEvaluator.php
Match lines: 2
148|            GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_PENDENTE => false,
261|            GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_PENDENTE => 'Documento pendente de validação',

File: src/Service/Effectiveness/Leadership/LeadershipEffectivenessAnalyzer.php
Match lines: 1
2977|        return $status !== '' && !str_contains($status, 'não avaliada') && !str_contains($status, 'pendente');

File: src/Service/EsocialAdminNotificationService.php
Match lines: 1
47|            ->setParameter('status', 'pendente')

File: src/Service/EsocialCompanyRubricaService.php
Match lines: 2
231|            $criteria = ['company' => $company, 'status' => 'pendente'];
239|            if (mb_strtolower((string) ($rubrica->getStatus() ?? '')) !== 'pendente') {

File: src/Service/FlowableServices/FlowableVariablesService.php
Match lines: 8
12326|                'label' => 'Pendente',
12995|                'label' => 'Pendente',
13354|                'label' => 'Pendente',
18879|     * Retorna eventos com status pendente de uma empresa eSocial.
18880|     * Este template agregado busca e retorna todos os eventos eSocial com status "pendente"
18882|     * status e dados básicos de cada evento pendente.
18900|        // Buscar todos os eventos com status "pendente" da empresa
18907|            ->setParameter('status', 'pendente')

File: src/Service/FlowableServices/LicenseFormatterService.php
Match lines: 1
390|                ['value' => 'Pendente', 'label' => 'Pendente'],

File: src/Service/Governance/CaseAutomation/GovernanceCaseAutomationActionRunner.php
Match lines: 1
97|        if ($snapshot->isResolved() && $toStatus !== 'pendente_acao') {

File: src/Service/Governance/CaseAutomation/GovernanceCaseAutomationRuleSyncService.php
Match lines: 1
332|                $normalized['statusIn'] = array_merge($normalized['statusIn'], ['pending_action', 'pendente_acao']);

File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationComplianceViewService.php
Match lines: 5
1619|        if ($statusReal === 'vencida' || in_array($statusRequisito, ['expirado', 'pendente'], true)) {
1637|        if ($statusRequisito === 'pendente') {
1639|                if ($document->getStatus() === GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_PENDENTE) {
1759|            if ($document->getStatus() === GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_PENDENTE) {
2186|            if ($document->getStatus() !== GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_PENDENTE) {

File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationMonitoringNotificationService.php
Match lines: 2
215|        if ($statusRequisito === 'pendente') {
217|                if ($document->getStatus() === GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_PENDENTE) {

File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationStatusService.php
Match lines: 2
36|            $vinculo->setStatusRequisito('pendente');
65|        $vinculo->setStatusRequisito($allMet ? 'valido' : 'pendente');

File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceMemberAuthorizationDocumentService.php
Match lines: 1
257|            ->setStatus(GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_PENDENTE)

File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceMemberPendenciesService.php
Match lines: 8
21|    public const STATUS_PENDENTE = 'pendente';
119|                self::STATUS_PENDENTE => 4,
211|        $status = self::STATUS_PENDENTE;
221|            $contextStatus = self::STATUS_PENDENTE;
234|                if ($docStatus === GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_PENDENTE) {
348|        $status = self::STATUS_PENDENTE;
470|            self::STATUS_PENDENTE => 4,
750|            default => 'Pendente',

File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceMemberProfileCnhService.php
Match lines: 2
161|            } elseif ($status === GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_PENDENTE) {
407|                        GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_PENDENTE,

File: src/Service/Governance/Grc/GovernanceCaseGrcEnrichmentService.php
Match lines: 2
1763|                        GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_PENDENTE => 'Aguardando validação',
3501|                if ($suffix === 'req_pending' && $document->getStatus() === GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_PENDENTE) {

File: src/Service/Governance/Grc/GovernanceCasesDashboardService.php
Match lines: 1
294|            'status_label' => $statusLabel !== '' ? $statusLabel : 'Pendente de ação',

File: src/Service/Home/HomeSsmaActivityCardService.php
Match lines: 1
389|        return ['neutral', 'Pendente'];

File: src/Service/JobListingService.php
Match lines: 1
447|            'label' => 'Pendente',

File: src/Service/Member/Import/MemberImportBatchTracker.php
Match lines: 1
22| * Status por linha usa conexão DBAL independente para sobreviver ao

File: src/Service/MetaHuman/GovernanceCasesActiveExampleSeeder.php
Match lines: 1
187|        $link->setStatusRequisito('pendente');

File: src/Service/MetaHuman/GovernanceCasesExampleAuthorizationSeeder.php
Match lines: 1
177|        $link->setStatusRequisito('pendente');

File: src/Service/MetaHuman/GovernanceCasesHubService.php
Match lines: 8
1282|                || $document->getStatus() !== GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_PENDENTE) {
4447|            'can_delete' => $document->getStatus() === GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_PENDENTE,
4738|                if ($suffix === 'req_pending' && $document->getStatus() === GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_PENDENTE) {
4970|        if ($document->getStatus() !== GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_PENDENTE) {
5276|                if ($document->getStatus() !== GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_PENDENTE) {
5347|            if ($document->getStatus() === GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_PENDENTE) {
6173|                && $document->getStatus() === GovernanceAuthorizationDocument::STATUS_PENDENTE) {
7287|            if (strtolower((string) ($documentRow['status'] ?? '')) === 'pendente') {

File: src/Service/OperationalCenterService.php
Match lines: 12
184|            'status' => 'Pendente',
191|            'uncheckedStatus' => 'Pendente',
268|        return ['Pendente', 'neutral', false];
333|        return ['Pendente', 'neutral', false];
407|            'status' => 'Pendente',
414|            'uncheckedStatus' => 'Pendente',
448|            'status' => 'Pendente',
455|            'uncheckedStatus' => 'Pendente',
487|            'status' => 'Pendente',
494|            'uncheckedStatus' => 'Pendente',
537|            'status' => 'Pendente',
544|            'uncheckedStatus' => 'Pendente',

File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/BehavioralIndicatorActionPlanApplicationService.php
Match lines: 1
445|                'status_label' => $evaluation !== null ? 'Avaliada' : 'Pendente',

File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/DynamicFilterService.php
Match lines: 1
1217|            ['value' => 'pending', 'label' => 'Pendente'],

File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/Metadata/MemberAnalysisMetadata.php
Match lines: 1
110|            ['value' => 'pendente', 'label' => 'Pendente'],

File: src/Service/QuestionnaireProcessorService.php
Match lines: 1
686|                    'status' => \App\Entity\UserInvitation::STATUS_AWAITING_ACTIVATION, // Apenas bloqueia se pendente

File: src/Service/SafetyEnvironmentService.php
Match lines: 3
470|            default => 'Pendente',
1023|                    'status' => 'Pendente',
1119|            MaintenanceIncident::STATUS_OPEN => 'Pendente',

File: src/Service/SpaceBookingCalendarSyncService.php
Match lines: 1
463|            SpaceBooking::STATUS_PENDING => 'Pendente',

File: src/Service/Ssma/Effectiveness/SecurityActionEffectivenessPresenter.php
Match lines: 1
1246|            'pending', 'pendente' => 'Pendente',

File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaActionPlanExecutiveReportBuilder.php
Match lines: 1
437|            'validacao' => static fn (array $a): string => ($a['validation_status'] ?? '') === 'pending_validation' ? 'Validação em atraso' : 'Validação pendente',

File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAdrianaConversationGuide.php
Match lines: 1
844|            && (str_contains($m, 'ainda preciso') || str_contains($m, 'pendente'));

File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaPanelAnalyticsService.php
Match lines: 1
22|        $byStatus = ['aberta' => 0, 'pendente' => 0, 'finalizada' => 0];

File: src/Service/TeamInterviewReportGenerator.php
Match lines: 1
290|            'pending' => 'Pendente',

File: src/Service/TeamNpsReportGenerator.php
Match lines: 1
230|            'pending' => 'Pendente',

File: src/Service/TimeManagement/TimeManagementService.php
Match lines: 1
4632|                AND o.status = 'pendente'

File: src/Service/Tools/EsocialService.php
Match lines: 1
91|            - Explique brevemente: \"O monitor de eventos permite acompanhar o status de envio dos eventos para o eSocial (pendentes, enviados, aceitos ou rejeitados). Vou te direcionar para lá.\"

File: src/Service/Trm/TrmAiService.php
Match lines: 1
171|                'badge' => $daysSince > 60 ? 'Urgente' : 'Pendente',

File: src/Service/ai_committee/Snapshot/OffboardingMemberSnapshotMapper.php
Match lines: 2
360|                    'status' => $signedUrl !== '' ? 'assinado' : 'pendente',
389|                'status' => 'pendente',

File: src/Service/ai_committee/SpecializedCommitteeEvidenceGate.php
Match lines: 1
182|            return $s !== '' && !\in_array($s, ['0', 'false', 'nao', 'não', 'ausente', 'pendente'], true);

File: src/Service/ai_committee/SpecializedCommitteeSessionDashboardDataResolver.php
Match lines: 1
4383|                default => 'Pendente',

File: src/Service/ai_committee/SpecializedCommitteeSessionHiringVacancyDashAligner.php
Match lines: 1
886|            ['label' => 'Orçamento', 'kind' => 'conflict', 'status_label' => 'Conflito', 'body' => 'Aprovação financeira pendente para envelope completo.'],

File: src/Service/ai_committee/SpecializedCommitteeSessionLaudoDashboardAssembler.php
Match lines: 1
2240|            default => 'Pendente',

Request #18 deepseek-v4-flash P:113.4K C:228 CR:108.54K CW:0 2971ms
Reasoning
There's an `EsocialAdminNotificationService` that queries status 'pendente' — line 47: `->setParameter('status', 'pendente')`. Let me see what that service does: it may notify admin when there are events pending transmission. Also, there's some batch transmission. If a draft S-2299 is created as 'pendente' with only skeleton data, an admin notification could be triggered to send incomplete event. Let me read EsocialAdminNotificationService lines ~30-70.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Service/EsocialAdminNotificationService.php", "start_line": 1, "end_line": 90}
File: src/Service/EsocialAdminNotificationService.php (Total lines: 140)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-90
1|<?php
2|
3|declare(strict_types=1);
4|
5|namespace App\Service;
6|
7|use App\Entity\Company;
8|use App\Entity\EsocialEvents;
9|use App\Entity\EsocialTiposArquivo;
10|use App\Entity\NotificationsCenter;
11|use App\Entity\User;
12|use Doctrine\ORM\EntityManagerInterface;
13|use Symfony\Component\Routing\Generator\UrlGeneratorInterface;
14|
15|class EsocialAdminNotificationService
16|{
17|    private const HUB = 'Hub de Operações';
18|    private const PRODUCT = 'eSocial';
19|    private const DELAYED_EVENT_THRESHOLD_DAYS = 2;
20|
21|    public function __construct(
22|        private EntityManagerInterface $entityManager,
23|        private NotificationsCenterService $notificationsCenterService,
24|        private UrlGeneratorInterface $urlGenerator
25|    ) {
26|    }
27|
28|    public function notifyCompletedEvent(EsocialEvents $event): void
29|    {
30|        $this->notifyAdmins($event, NotificationsCenter::TYPE_GENERAL, 'completed');
31|    }
32|
33|    public function notifyDelayedEvent(EsocialEvents $event): void
34|    {
35|        $this->notifyAdmins($event, NotificationsCenter::TYPE_PROBLEM, 'delayed');
36|    }
37|
38|    public function notifyDelayedPendingEventsByCompany(Company $company): void
39|    {
40|        $thresholdDate = new \DateTimeImmutable(sprintf('-%d days', self::DELAYED_EVENT_THRESHOLD_DAYS));
41|        $pendingEvents = $this->entityManager->getRepository(EsocialEvents::class)
42|            ->createQueryBuilder('event')
43|            ->andWhere('event.company = :company')
44|            ->andWhere('event.status = :status')
45|            ->andWhere('event.createdAt < :threshold')
46|            ->setParameter('company', $company)
47|            ->setParameter('status', 'pendente')
48|            ->setParameter('threshold', $thresholdDate)
49|            ->getQuery()
50|            ->getResult();
51|
52|        foreach ($pendingEvents as $pendingEvent) {
53|            if ($pendingEvent instanceof EsocialEvents) {
54|                $this->notifyDelayedEvent($pendingEvent);
55|            }
56|        }
57|    }
58|
59|    private function notifyAdmins(EsocialEvents $event, string $type, string $statusKey): void
60|    {
61|        $company = $event->getCompany();
62|        if (!$company instanceof Company) {
63|            return;
64|        }
65|
66|        $eventCode = $this->resolveEventCode($event);
67|        $eventDescription = $this->resolveEventDescription($eventCode);
68|        $baseUrl = $this->urlGenerator->generate('eSocial_events_management', [], UrlGeneratorInterface::ABSOLUTE_PATH);
69|        $buttonUrlWithKey = sprintf('%s?event=%d&status=%s', $baseUrl, (int) $event->getId(), $statusKey);
70|
71|        if ($statusKey === 'completed') {
72|            $content = sprintf('Evento %s (%s) foi concluído no eSocial.', $eventCode, $eventDescription);
73|        } else {
74|            $content = sprintf('Evento %s (%s) está em atraso no eSocial.', $eventCode, $eventDescription);
75|        }
76|
77|        foreach ($this->resolveAdminRecipients($company) as $recipient) {
78|            $alreadyExists = $this->entityManager->getRepository(NotificationsCenter::class)->findOneBy([
79|                'recipient' => $recipient,
80|                'hub' => self::HUB,
81|                'product' => self::PRODUCT,
82|                'type' => $type,
83|                'buttonUrl' => $buttonUrlWithKey,
84|                'isExcluded' => false,
85|            ]);
86|
87|            if ($alreadyExists instanceof NotificationsCenter) {
88|                continue;
89|            }
90|
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "EsocialAdminNotificationService"}
File: docs/Notifications/GUIA_USO_NOTIFICATIONS_CENTER.md
Match lines: 1
29|- `src/Service/EsocialAdminNotificationService.php` — eSocial

File: src/MessageHandler/EnviarEventoMessageHandler.php
Match lines: 4
23|use App\Service\EsocialAdminNotificationService;
42|    private $esocialAdminNotificationService;
52|        EsocialAdminNotificationService $esocialAdminNotificationService
60|        $this->esocialAdminNotificationService = $esocialAdminNotificationService;

File: src/Service/EsocialAdminNotificationService.php
Match lines: 1
15|class EsocialAdminNotificationService

Request #19 deepseek-v4-flash P:114.79K C:994 CR:113.54K CW:0 9104ms
Reasoning
This supports that there are admin notifications for 'pendente' events older than 2 days. The S-2299 pendente draft events created by this automation will eventually trigger "atrasado" notifications to admins if not transmitted within 2 days. That's actually intended: the draft is meant to be reviewed and completed; if left pending, the admin notification may be noise, but that's existing behavior for all pendente events. Fine. Now, let me make final decisions on which findings to report. Focused, real, and tied to changed lines: ### Migration file 1. **(medium) Migration seeds offboarding template/product into every tenant that has the exit workflow, regardless of whether the company has offboarding in its service package/feature access.** The app gates offboarding via ServicePackage features (`FEATURES['offboarding']`). The migration inserts `workflow_products` + active `flow_templates` + automations for all such companies, which effectively enables (or exposes) the offboarding product flow for tenants that didn't contract it. Recommendation: add per-company entitlement check (e.g., feature/service-package active) before seeding, or explicitly confirm in docs. Since the documentation file says "Semeia apenas empresas que ja possuem o workflow" and does not mention package check, flag medium. Wait — is this actually going to "expose" the feature? Creating a template within an existing workflow probably does not grant permission to use it if the UI hides products not purchased. But the workflow_products row now includes offboarding product for that workflow; the workflow (Fluxo de saída) may already be used for other things. But since offboarding is now added as a product for the workflow, a company can now create offboarding flows. If they didn't purchase offboarding, that is a business/entitlement bypass. This is a plausible real issue worth flagging. 2. **(medium) Down() deleting workflow_products row created by the seed:** The `DELETE` guard only checks active templates in the same workflow using the product, but not instances in progress (flow instances may still be running created from the seeded template — but wait, down() deactivates the template then... order: it DELETEs workflow_products BEFORE deactivating the template? No—the DELETE only happens when workflow_product_was_created and no OTHER active template uses the product; since this seeded template is still active at DELETE time but excluded via `active_ft.id <> :templateId`, if the seeded template is the ONLY active template using the product, the DELETE removes the workflow_products row that the seeded template depends on, while the template remains active until the subsequent UPDATE deactivates it. FK? flow_templates has workflow_id; not referencing workflow_products. flow_template_products references flow_templates and product, not workflow_products. So deleting workflow_products while template still active could leave template associated with the workflow through workflow_id anyway. So deletion is probably harmless, except for instances in progress tied to the workflow-product association. Since FK-wise there may not be a direct FK from flow_instances to workflow_products. Not clearly a bug. But also there's a possibility that an existing template that was NOT created by this seed but is inactive still uses the product; then the row is deleted, and if the operator re-activates that template later, the product link would be missing, and flow may break. But that seems an edge. I'll probably not report down() DELETE issue given uncertainty, unless I find an actual FK. Not verified enough → maybe skip or keep as "atenção" on the migration's idempotency/rollback gap. Precision over recall says skip. 3. **Up() early return/silent partial:** Since seed migrations in this repo are non-transactional and table existence checks used elsewhere (Version20260518151423 does similar). Skip. But one concrete migration issue: in up(), the table existence check list includes 'company'. Let me verify actual table name of the Company entity — is it `company` or `companies`? Let's search. If the actual table is 'company' then fine. Let me check quickly with a search for the Company entity @ORM\Table.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "@ORM\\Table(name=\"company"}
File: src/Entity/Company.php
Match lines: 1
16| * @ORM\Table(name="company")

File: src/Entity/CompanyArea.php
Match lines: 1
12| * @ORM\Table(name="company_area")

File: src/Entity/CompanyAssessmentConfig.php
Match lines: 1
10| * @ORM\Table(name="company_assessment_config", uniqueConstraints={

File: src/Entity/CompanyFeaturesAddons.php
Match lines: 1
9| * @ORM\Table(name="company_features_addons")

File: src/Entity/CompanyInterviewLimit.php
Match lines: 1
10| * @ORM\Table(name="company_interview_limits", uniqueConstraints={

File: src/Entity/CompanyInterviewUnlimitedAccess.php
Match lines: 1
9| * @ORM\Table(name="company_interview_unlimited_access", uniqueConstraints={

File: src/Entity/CompanyProcessLock.php
Match lines: 1
9| * @ORM\Table(name="company_process_lock")

code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "getSourceMetadata|setSourceMetadata", "file_patterns": ["src/Entity/FlowInstanceMember.php"]}
No matches found
Request #20 deepseek-v4-flash P:116.04K C:730 CR:115.71K CW:0 6681ms
Reasoning
The company table name is indeed `company`, so that's fine. Now let's think carefully about what happens when this migration is executed on existing prod DB with many companies. Key: only companies having a workflows row with slug='fluxo-de-saida' get the seed. That's the documented filter. The entitlement question remains but let me check if the product/offboarding gating is enforced by ServicePackage FEATURES. Let's check if `has_access` in ServicePackage is per-company? ServicePackage is a fixed catalog mapping (const FEATURES) with has_access 0 default, likely per-company service_package rows override. There may be a CompanyFeaturesAddons or service_package per company. Let me search how product offboarding availability is enforced: search 'ServicePackage' feature and 'offboarding' to see enforcement during flow creation. But it's enough for a review comment that migration does not check company-level entitlement while the product gating elsewhere uses features. I'll frame as medium/attention. Let me now verify the actual canonical repository saveEventS2299 no status dedupe and duplication concern from the automation path. Actually, wait, let me reconsider - are there other places that create `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento`? Yes repository saveEventS2299 (used by controller for manual tab). Both always `status='pendente'`. The new automation's `findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal` finds only events with `status != 'pendente'` i.e., official/sent/erro events. If a pending draft was created earlier via the manual esocial tab (same trabalhador + remuneracao + dismissal date), the automation does NOT match it and creates a NEW pendente event. That is a duplicate-draft bug; idempotency claim broken in that scenario. I'll report as medium. Wait, maybe the manual tab is for S-2299 creation, but when the automation is part of offboarding flow, would the manual event have a matching dtDeslig? If the member guide tab's event was created with the same dataDesligamento as the offboarding's dismissal date, then yes. The UI's default? Possibly. The duplication risk is real enough to flag. Now let me also validate the `system_sender` change to ensure the behavior of payroll notifications isn't regressed: `$isSystemSender = filter_var($config['system_sender'] ?? false, FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN) || (payroll condition)`. Since the payroll condition remains, behavior preserved for payroll; adding new boolean config is additive. But note: previously `$isPayrollSystemSender` determined both the chat conversation (assistant) and something else? Let me re-read the region to see whether `$isSystemSender` replaced `$isPayrollSystemSender` at both usage sites, or if there was another place where payroll condition still uses the old variable (inconsistent). Let me read the region around 13900-13990 to see all usages.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 13860, "end_line": 13990}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15626)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 13860-13990
13860|        error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] FIM - Total enviado: " . count($chatUserIds));
13861|        
13862|        return $chatUserIds;
13863|    }
13864|    
13865|    /**
13866|     * Envia mensagem no chat - canal compartilhado OU mensagem direta
13867|     * 
13868|     * - employee/collaborator/candidate → Mensagem DIRETA do manager para o usuário
13869|     * - flow_responsible/responsible/manager/outros → Canal "Suporte Meta" compartilhado
13870|     * 
13871|     * @param User $user Destinatário da mensagem
13872|     * @param string $title Título/assunto
13873|     * @param string $message Corpo da mensagem
13874|     * @param FlowInstanceMember|null $member Membro do fluxo (para contexto)
13875|     * @param string|null $recipientType Tipo de destinatário (employee, flow_responsible, etc.)
13876|     * @return array ['sent' => bool, 'conversationId' => int|null, 'messageId' => int|null]
13877|     */
13878|    private function sendChatNotification(User $user, string $title, string $message, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, ?string $recipientType = null, array $config = []): array
13879|    {
13880|        try {
13881|            // 1. Obter a empresa do membro/usuário
13882|            $company = null;
13883|            if ($member && $member->getFlowInstance()) {
13884|                $company = $member->getFlowInstance()->getCompany();
13885|            }
13886|            
13887|            if (!$company) {
13888|                // Tentar obter empresa do usuário via CompanyMembers
13889|                $companyMember = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\CompanyMembers::class)
13890|                    ->findOneBy(['user' => $user]);
13891|                if ($companyMember) {
13892|                    $company = $companyMember->getCompany();
13893|                }
13894|            }
13895|            
13896|            if (!$company) {
13897|                $this->log('warning', 'Não foi possível determinar empresa para envio de chat', [
13898|                    'userId' => $user->getId()
13899|                ]);
13900|                return ['sent' => false, 'error' => 'Empresa não encontrada'];
13901|            }
13902|            
13903|            // 2. Determinar canal:
13904|            // - CRM responsibles (record_owner/board_owner) must receive direct messages
13905|            // - employee/collaborator/candidate already use direct mode
13906|            // - request_notification actions (com approve_url/reject_url) também devem ser mensagens diretas,
13907|            //   independente do recipient_type (ex.: direct_manager, company_member no assessment)
13908|            $isRequestNotification = !empty($config['approve_url']) || !empty($config['reject_url']);
13909|            // Notificações sistêmicas são geradas pela assistente "Adriana",
13910|            // não por um gestor específico: a mensagem no chat deve sair sem remetente
13911|            // (userId = null), que o front renderiza como Adriana/Sistema.
13912|            $isSystemSender = filter_var($config['system_sender'] ?? false, FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN)
13913|                || ($member instanceof FlowInstanceMember
13914|                    && $member->getSourceType() === PayrollClosingBpmnService::SOURCE_TYPE);
13915|            // 'direct' is used by sendChatToSpecificEmails when the user was already resolved —
13916|            // always send a personal direct message in that case.
13917|            // training_group_responsible / responsible also get direct messages.
13918|            $isDirectMessage = $isRequestNotification
13919|                || in_array($recipientType, [
13920|                    'employee', 'collaborator', 'candidate',
13921|                    'record_owner', 'board_owner',
13922|                    'direct_manager', 'company_member', 'flow_responsible',
13923|                    'responsible', 'training_group_responsible',
13924|                    'direct',
13925|                ], true);
13926|
13927|            $fullMessage = "📢 **{$title}**\n\n{$message}";
13928|
13929|            // Sistema: o remetente é a própria Adriana, então a notificação deve cair na
13930|            // conversa exclusiva da Adriana (ai_assistant) do destinatário — e não numa conversa
13931|            // "individual" entre gestores. Isso também evita o caso em que, quando destinatário e
13932|            // gestor da empresa são o mesmo usuário, a busca por conversa individual acabava
13933|            // recaindo na conversa de outra pessoa.
13934|            if ($isSystemSender) {
13935|                $assistantConversation = $this->getOrCreateAssistantConversation($user);
13936|                if (!$assistantConversation) {
13937|                    return ['sent' => false, 'error' => 'Não foi possível obter a conversa da Adriana'];
13938|                }
13939|
13940|                $this->initializeChatUnreadBaseline($assistantConversation, $user);
13941|
13942|                $chatMessage = new \App\Entity\ChatMessage();
13943|                $chatMessage->setConversationId($assistantConversation->getId());
13944|                $chatMessage->setConversation($assistantConversation);
13945|                $chatMessage->setUserId(null); // Mensagem da Adriana em conversa ai_assistant
13946|                $chatMessage->setMessage($fullMessage);
13947|                $chatMessage->setTimestamp(new \DateTime());
13948|                $chatMessage->setIsInitialMessage(false);
13949|
13950|                $this->entityManager->persist($chatMessage);
13951|                $this->entityManager->flush();
13952|
13953|                return [
13954|                    'sent' => true,
13955|                    'conversationId' => $assistantConversation->getId(),
13956|                    'messageId' => $chatMessage->getId()
13957|                ];
13958|            }
13959|
13960|            if ($isDirectMessage) {
13961|                // ===== MENSAGEM DIRETA: Manager → Employee =====
13962|                error_log("💬 [sendChatNotification] Modo DIRETO para recipientType={$recipientType}");
13963|                
13964|                // Buscar ROLE_MANAGER da empresa
13965|                $adminUser = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\User::class)
13966|                    ->createQueryBuilder('u')
13967|                    ->where('u.company = :company')
13968|                    ->andWhere('u.roles LIKE :role')
13969|                    ->setParameter('company', $company)
13970|                    ->setParameter('role', '%ROLE_MANAGER%')
13971|                    ->setMaxResults(1)
13972|                    ->getQuery()
13973|                    ->getOneOrNullResult();
13974|                
13975|                if (!$adminUser) {
13976|                    return ['sent' => false, 'error' => 'Admin da empresa não encontrado'];
13977|                }
13978|                
13979|                // Buscar ou criar conversa individual entre manager e employee
13980|                $individualConversation = $this->getOrCreateIndividualConversation($adminUser, $user, $company);
13981|                
13982|                if (!$individualConversation) {
13983|                    return ['sent' => false, 'error' => 'Não foi possível criar conversa individual'];
13984|                }
13985|                
13986|                $chatMessage = new \App\Entity\ChatMessage();
13987|                $chatMessage->setConversationId($individualConversation->getId());
13988|                $chatMessage->setConversation($individualConversation);
13989|                $chatMessage->setUserId($adminUser->getId());
13990|                $chatMessage->setMessage($fullMessage);
Request #21 deepseek-v4-flash P:118.73K C:322 CR:116.74K CW:0 2889ms
Reasoning
This `sendChatNotification` receives `$config` param. The new automation calls `executeNotify` (not sendChatNotification directly). Wait: in `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, they call `$this->executeNotify([... 'system_sender' => true ...], ...)`. Let me check `executeNotify` signature and whether the config array flows to sendChatNotification; the earlier changed lines at 7039 in emailConfig and 13912 are part of executeNotify → sendChat? Let me confirm by reading executeNotify method. Also there may be another occurrence of `$isPayrollSystemSender` usage. Let me search within file for `isPayrollSystemSender` to ensure no leftover reference (undefined variable). If the rename left a stale usage, that would be a bug.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "isPayrollSystemSender|isSystemSender|system_sender", "file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"]}
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "private function executeNotify|function executeNotify", "file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"]}
No matches found
Request #22 deepseek-v4-flash P:119.08K C:223 CR:119.04K CW:0 2925ms
Reasoning
Odd - the earlier diff at line 13912 showed `$isSystemSender = filter_var(...)`. But now code_search returns nothing for 'system_sender' in this file? Wait, earlier code_search for `status.*pendente|'pendente'` in the service returned matches at 14984, 15231, 15275 for the new code. And the file_read of lines 13860-13990 shows `$isSystemSender` at 13912 and the new code in file_read at 14927 etc. So code_search failing might be due to pattern search limitations. But we see the file_read confirmed those lines exist. Fine. Now I need to find executeNotify to see if config gets passed through to sendChatNotification (config['system_sender'] reaching it). Let me search for 'executeNotify' definition.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "executeNotify(array"}
File: .docs/NOTIFICACOES_MULTIPLOS_CANAIS.md
Match lines: 1
378|private function executeNotify(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array

File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 10
456|            'notify_employee' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'employee'], $config), $member, $context),
457|            'notify_responsible' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'responsible'], $config), $member, $context),
458|            'notify_flow_responsible' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'flow_responsible'], $config), $member, $context),
460|            'notify_manager' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'manager'], $config), $member, $context),
461|            'notify_administrators' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'administrators'], $config), $member, $context),
463|            'notify_training_responsible' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'training_group_responsible'], $config), $member, $context),
464|            'notify_participant' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'member'], $config), $member, $context),
2049|        return $this->executeNotify(array_merge($config, [
6922|        return $this->executeNotify(array_merge([
6930|    private function executeNotify(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array

Request #23 deepseek-v4-flash P:119.69K C:165 CR:119.3K CW:0 2455ms
Reasoning
Let me read executeNotify at line 6930 to verify the flow and how config system_sender is used within notifications (probably calls sendChatNotification and email). Also, confirm that message_html is actually used with the review button (it is embedded in chat message? or email?). Let's read around 6930-7070 to verify executeNotify uses message_html.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 6930, "end_line": 7080}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15626)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 6930-7080
6930|    private function executeNotify(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
6931|    {
6932|        $recipients = $config['recipients'] ?? [];
6933|        $recipientType = $config['to'] ?? $config['recipient'] ?? null;
6934|        $title = $config['title'] ?? $config['subject'] ?? null;
6935|        $message = $config['message'] ?? $config['body'] ?? null;
6936|        $messageHtml = $config['message_html'] ?? null;
6937|        $type = $config['type'] ?? 'info';
6938|        $templateSlug = $config['template'] ?? null;
6939|        
6940|        // Se recipients está vazio mas há 'to' ou 'recipient', usar como recipient único
6941|        if (empty($recipients) && $recipientType) {
6942|            $recipients = [$recipientType];
6943|        }
6944|        
6945|        // Fallback: se não há destinatários definidos, enviar para responsável do fluxo
6946|        if (empty($recipients)) {
6947|            error_log("[NOTIFY] ⚠️ Nenhum destinatário definido (to/recipient/recipients vazios) - usando fallback 'flow_responsible'");
6948|            $recipientType = 'flow_responsible';
6949|            $recipients = ['flow_responsible'];
6950|        }
6951|        
6952|        // 🎯 GERAR MENSAGEM AUTOMÁTICA se não foi fornecida
6953|        if (empty($title) || empty($message)) {
6954|            $autoMessage = $this->generateAutoNotificationMessage($member, $recipientType, $context);
6955|            $title = $title ?: $autoMessage['title'];
6956|            $message = $message ?: $autoMessage['message'];
6957|        }
6958|        
6959|        $title = $this->replaceVariables($title, $member, $context);
6960|        $message = $this->replaceVariables($message, $member, $context);
6961|        if ($messageHtml !== null && $messageHtml !== '') {
6962|            $messageHtml = $this->replaceVariables($messageHtml, $member, $context);
6963|        } else {
6964|            $messageHtml = null;
6965|        }
6966|
6967|        $emailTemplateBody = ($messageHtml !== null && $messageHtml !== '') ? $messageHtml : $message;
6968|        
6969|        $createdNotifications = [];
6970|        $emailsSent = [];
6971|        $chatMessagesSent = [];
6972|        
6973|        foreach ($recipients as $recipientType) {
6974|            // Merge context with action config so recipient resolvers can reuse action-specific keys.
6975|            // Example: manager_permission_products, role_id, company_member_id.
6976|            // title/subject must be the already-replaced strings: CompanySenderGenerator renders
6977|            // the DB template subject as Twig (e.g. "{{ title }} – {{ companyName }}"). If we keep
6978|            // config['title'] here, placeholders like {{member_name}} inside the automation title stay literal.
6979|            $recipientContext = array_merge($context, $config, [
6980|                'message' => $emailTemplateBody,
6981|                'body' => $emailTemplateBody,
6982|                'title' => $title,
6983|                'subject' => $title,
6984|            ]);
6985|            $users = $this->resolveRecipients($recipientType, $member, $recipientContext);
6986|            
6987|            foreach ($users as $user) {
6988|                // 1️⃣ NOTIFICAÇÃO IN-APP (badge/popup)
6989|                try {
6990|                    $notification = new \App\Entity\NotificationSpecialist();
6991|                    $notification->setUser($user);
6992|                    $notification->setTitle($title);
6993|                    $notification->setMessage($message);
6994|                    $notification->setIsRead(false);
6995|                    $notification->setCreatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
6996|                    
6997|                    $this->entityManager->persist($notification);
6998|                    $createdNotifications[] = $user->getId();
6999|
7000|                    if ($this->notificationsCenterService instanceof NotificationsCenterService) {
7001|                        $notificationType = \App\Entity\NotificationsCenter::TYPE_REQUEST;
7002|                        if (str_contains((string) $templateSlug, 'bpm-notification') || $type === 'info') {
7003|                            $notificationType = \App\Entity\NotificationsCenter::TYPE_SYSTEM;
7004|                        }
7005|                        $this->notificationsCenterService->createNotification(
7006|                            recipient: $user,
7007|                            hub: 'Hub de Operações',
7008|                            product: 'Workflow BPM',
7009|                            content: trim($title . ': ' . $message),
7010|                            type: $notificationType,
7011|                            sender: null,
7012|                            buttonUrl: '/chat?adriana=1',
7013|                            flush: false
7014|                        );
7015|                    }
7016|                    
7017|                    $this->log('info', '✅ Notificação in-app criada', [
7018|                        'userId' => $user->getId(),
7019|                        'title' => $title
7020|                    ]);
7021|                } catch (\Exception $e) {
7022|                    $this->log('error', 'Erro ao criar notificação in-app', ['error' => $e->getMessage()]);
7023|                }
7024|                
7025|                // 2️⃣ EMAIL (se houver template ou corpo)
7026|                // NOTA: executeSendEmail() JÁ envia mensagem no chat automaticamente
7027|                // conforme documentação (Email + Chat em um único canal)
7028|                if ($templateSlug || !empty($emailTemplateBody)) {
7029|                    try {
7030|                        $emailConfig = [
7031|                            'to' => $user->getEmail(),
7032|                            'subject' => $title,
7033|                            'body' => $emailTemplateBody,
7034|                            'template' => $templateSlug,
7035|                            '_resolved_recipient_type' => $recipientType,
7036|                            // Keep request decision links when routing through executeSendEmail;
7037|                            // chat action buttons depend on these URLs.
7038|                            'approve_url' => $config['approve_url'] ?? null,
7039|                            'reject_url' => $config['reject_url'] ?? null,
7040|                            'approve_button_text' => $config['approve_button_text'] ?? null,
7041|                            'reject_button_text' => $config['reject_button_text'] ?? null,
7042|                            'request_type_label' => $config['request_type_label'] ?? null,
7043|                            'record_name' => $config['record_name'] ?? null,
7044|                            'system_sender' => $config['system_sender'] ?? null,
7045|                        ];
7046|                        if (filter_var($config['skip_auto_email_template'] ?? false, FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN)) {
7047|                            $emailConfig['skip_auto_email_template'] = true;
7048|                        }
7049|
7050|                        $emailResult = $this->executeSendEmail($emailConfig, $member, $recipientContext);
7051|                        
7052|                        if ($emailResult['sent'] ?? false) {
7053|                            $emailsSent[] = $user->getEmail();
7054|                            // Contabilizar mensagens de chat enviadas automaticamente pelo executeSendEmail
7055|                            if (isset($emailResult['chatMessagesSent']) && $emailResult['chatMessagesSent'] > 0) {
7056|                                $chatMessagesSent = array_merge($chatMessagesSent, $emailResult['chatUserIds'] ?? []);
7057|                            }
7058|                            $this->log('info', '✅ Email enviado via notificação (chat incluído automaticamente)', [
7059|                                'to' => $user->getEmail(),
7060|                                'subject' => $title
7061|                            ]);
7062|                        }
7063|                    } catch (\Exception $e) {
7064|                        $this->log('error', 'Erro ao enviar email via notificação', [
7065|                            'error' => $e->getMessage(),
7066|                            'to' => $user->getEmail()
7067|                        ]);
7068|                    }
7069|                }
7070|            }
7071|        }
7072|        
7073|        $this->entityManager->flush();
7074|        
7075|        return [
7076|            'notified' => count($createdNotifications),
7077|            'userIds' => $createdNotifications,
7078|            'emailsSent' => count($emailsSent),
7079|            'emails' => $emailsSent,
7080|            'chatMessagesSent' => count($chatMessagesSent),
Request #24 deepseek-v4-flash P:122.04K C:1.73K CR:119.81K CW:0 13963ms
Reasoning
executeNotify: message_html goes into the email body ($emailTemplateBody). It calls executeSendEmail with emailConfig including system_sender. So notification is sent as email with HTML body including the review button link, and if template is empty and emailTemplateBody not empty, then it will send an email with raw HTML button and also auto chat? Note `executeSendEmail` auto-sends chat. And there's the earlier code path in the diff around line 13903-13934 that routes to sendChatNotification with `$config['system_sender']` for chat when the assistant conversation is used. So when the S-2299 automation notifies the responsible, the responsible gets: an in-app notification, an email with the "Revisar desligamento eSocial" button (raw URL in email, but email HTML is fine), and a chat message in the assistant (Adriana) conversation, per the PR description. The buttonUrl for in-app notification points to '/chat?adriana=1' (pre-existing). The message_html in chat? Wait, sendChatNotification sends $fullMessage (the plain text message) not the html. The HTML with button is only in email body. In the chat, the Adriana conversation message will be the plain text; the PR says "O botão 'ver detalhes' direciona para o chat com a Adriana, onde fica a orientação para revisar o desligamento." So in-app notification button goes to chat; the email has the review button linking directly to the member page. Good. Hmm, is `message_html` passed to chat? No. Not important. Now note the earlier change at line ~7044 adds 'system_sender' => $config['system_sender'] ?? null to emailConfig and executeSendEmail presumably forwards to sendChatNotification config; and sendChatNotification now checks system_sender boolean to route to assistant conversation instead of "direct" or "shared". But there's a subtlety: when system_sender=true and it routes to assistant conversation, the message has no link/buttons (plain text). For the email channel, system_sender is likely used inside executeSendEmail too... But in this specific flow, the automation for S-2299 passes system_sender => true. Then executeNotify → the chat portion (via executeSendEmail) sends to assistant conversation. Fine. Now: potential issue: `executeNotify` also creates in-app NotificationSpecialist with the `title` and `message`; message contains `{{member_name}}` replaced by `replaceVariables`. OK. One more: the in-app notification's `buttonUrl` is '/chat?adriana=1'. Since responsible might want the review URL — that's ok per design. Now let's evaluate the earlier concern about the two flush calls for metadata eventId: in the case `$eventStatus === 'existing_not_editable'`, `$event` is set (existing official), so after the first flush, metadata eventId updated with $event->getId() — fine. Also in draft_only (no event), `$event` null, metadata eventId null. OK. Now look for one more concrete issue: In the created branch, `$this->entityManager->persist($event)` is executed at line 15002 inside the try; but if event is created and esocialTrabalhador missing, no event. Fine. But there is another important subtle bug: **metadata `esocialS2299Draft.eventId` is only written after the first flush; but findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding only matches if metadata `eventId` non-empty AND `offboardingMemberId` matches. However, once the offboarding reuses the same FlowInstanceMember but the run occurs when the previously-created draft event already has a *different* status (e.g., the responsible completed and sent the event -> status 'enviado'/'processado'), then it would match via metadata and take the 'existing_not_editable' branch. Good. But wait, there's an even more subtle bug: on a re-run where the event was already found and status == 'pendente' (branch 'updated'), the code sets only empty fields. However, `$eventStatus` is set to 'updated' whenever a metadata-linked pendente event is found — even if nothing changed (e.g., member re-entered final stage). Then the notification message would say "O rascunho do S-2299 ... foi atualizado". Not a bug per se. Let me now also confirm the earlier possible "eventStatus === 'updated' & onlyEmptyFields true" logic inversion. Actually, I realize a potential real bug: When the metadata-linked event is found with status 'pendente' (created on an earlier run), the update path uses onlyEmptyFields=true. This means that if this is the first time the payload has data for a field (e.g., earlier run the payload had empty dtDeslig because the dismissal date wasn't set yet, and now it is), it will fill it. But if the offboarding data *changed* (dismissal date moved), the field won't be updated. Given the flow is triggered when the member enters the final stage, the dismissal date is typically already set and stable. This nuance is borderline. I'd report low/medium. Now for the review comments, which to include (must anchor on NEWLY ADDED lines in diff with existing_code exact): **Migration comments:** M1 (medium) Cross-tenant seed without entitlement filter. Anchor at line 39-42 SELECT workflows (new lines). existing_code: ``` $workflowRows = $this->connection->fetchAllAssociative( 'SELECT id, company_id FROM workflows WHERE slug = :slug', ['slug' => self::WORKFLOW_SLUG] ); ``` Severity: medium. Category: other (or security?). It's a data/business isolation issue. I'd categorize as "bug"? It's more "security"/"other". Use "security"? The instructions categories: bug, security, performance, maintainability, test, style, documentation, other. I'll pick "security" since it can expose products to tenants without entitlement — maybe "bug" is better. Hmm. This concern is about granting product/flow to companies that didn't contract it, causing possible unauthorized feature exposure. Use "security" severity medium? Let's be measured: since the app gates products via service packages, seeding for all tenants may bypass entitlement. I'll use "security" with severity medium and explain the app already has per-company gating (ServicePackage FEATURES). I should phrase to ask confirmation rather than assert. Wait — but is it really bypass? The migration simply adds workflow product link and template. Without admin/package gating checks on flow use? The template appears in workflow "Fluxo de Saída" for all companies. If a company without the offboarding package opens the workflow and instantiates the template, would the UI block it? There's no server check in the migration path. So yes, they'd gain use of the offboarding flow with esocial S-2299 action. Realistic concern. But we must be careful: maybe in this product, offboarding module is not per-company licensed but part of base features, and products table `active=1` is the only gate. The FEATURES array is static global defaults with 'has_access' 0, but actual access is likely determined by each company's service_package config row overriding has_access per company. That indicates per-company entitlement. Let me verify quickly: search for ServicePackage FEATURES usage for offboarding gating e.g., 'canAccess' or 'features'. Quick search 'has_access' to see how it's used.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "offboarding", "file_patterns": ["src/Service/NewPackageProductsService.php", "src/Service/CompanyAppVisibilityService.php", "src/Service/FeatureCatalogService.php"]}
File: src/Service/CompanyAppVisibilityService.php
Match lines: 2
39|        'offboarding' => 'offboarding',
181|        'offboarding' => 'offboarding',

File: src/Service/FeatureCatalogService.php
Match lines: 3
17|        'offboarding' => 'offboarding',
78|        'offboarding' => 'icon-i-offboarding',
148|        'offboarding' => 'icon-i-offboarding',

File: src/Service/NewPackageProductsService.php
Match lines: 1
36|        'offboarding' => 'Offboarding',

Request #25 deepseek-v4-flash P:123.91K C:3K CR:123.65K CW:0 24239ms
Reasoning
These confirm there's a feature catalog where 'offboarding' is a product feature visible per company; this strengthens the per-tenant gating notion but it isn't conclusive enough to make a hard claim. I will word the comment to point out that the migration seeds every company's exit workflow without checking company-level product/feature eligibility, and that this pattern differs from runtime feature gating; ask to confirm/restrict or at least document per-company plan. Severity medium. Now, other migration issues to include? The plan issue 4/5 (partial seed/rollback) — given repo precedent and doc coverage, I'll include a single consolidated comment about non-atomic seed without transaction combined with silent partial seeding? Actually there is an important subtle issue: **the up() early-returns silently when any listed table is missing, and Doctrine will still mark the migration as executed**, so a partial install in an env that lacks one workflow table is a silent no-op with no log. The doc says that's intended for "Ambientes com tabelas de workflow ausentes pulam a execucao sem erro." It's documented as intended. So skip. But there is a genuine idempotency gap in the seed: `ensureTemplateProduct` — if the template was previously seeded (same templateId) and a later partial run already inserted the stage/automation, no problem. But suppose `ensureWorkflowProduct` created a `workflow_products` link for a company where the product link already existed but with order_index something else — it overwrites order_index to 0. But then if down() is run and workflow_product_was_created = false, it doesn't delete the link; fine. Actually, let me reexamine one concrete potential bug in up(): When `ensureTemplate` returns an existing seeded template that was **deactivated by a previous down()** (settings now have `seed_migration_rolled_back`, not `seed_migration`), the SELECT in ensureTemplate won't find it (it filters by seed_migration = SEED_KEY). Then it will insert a NEW template each time migration runs again after rollback. Idempotency between up/down/up: after rollback, if you run up() again (e.g., migrate to reapply after rollback), the migration won't run again (already recorded), so not applicable. Fine. Potential duplication issue if the same template name already exists from a user manually creating it earlier (before migration) with same name 'Offboarding com eSocial (S-2299)': ensureStage checks by LOWER(name) in same template; ensureAutomation checks name+trigger+action in same stage; no cross-template dedup issue because each template gets fresh rows. And ensureTemplate checks only by seed marker, so if the user manually created a template with the same name but not seed marker, migration will create a second template with the same name → duplicate template for the company. Edge-case, low probability. Actually, wait — there's a subtle bug in `ensureStage`: it inserts `product_slot_index = NULL` and `product_id = :productId`. If the user later creates their own template with same stage name, that's separate template. Fine. **AutomationExecutionService comments:** A1 (medium) - duplicate pendente draft event when one exists that was not created by this automation (manual S-2299 tab). Anchor at the else branch lines 14989-14996 or 15219-15235 query. I'll anchor at the `findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal` query's `->andWhere('event.status != :pendingStatus')` line (15226). Explain: the query intentionally ignores pendente events; combined with metadata-link, pendente drafts created manually in the eSocial tab (saveEventS2299 also records status 'pendente') are not matched, so a second draft gets created on the same dismissal → duplicate S-2299 pending events. Suggest: also match pendente events for the same dismissal, and treat as editable/update (like metadata-linked), or dedupe with repository search by company/trabalhador/remuneracao/dtDeslig/status pendente. Let me double check saveEventS2299 manual path uses same data (trabalhador/remuneracao/company/date). Yes. However, if a manual pendente event already exists and the automation creates a second pendente for same date, will the UI show two? Possibly confusing and could cause double transmission of a S-2299 for the same dismissal date (duplicate official events). High-ish. Severity medium. A2 (medium) - event created directly with no validation and no canonical flow mapping + free-text motivo of length >2 stored to a length=2 column; plus missing required eSocial fields (mtvDeslig) not being pre-filled from offboarding reason. Hmm. Actually, let's verify whether there's a validation risk: `applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue` for mtvDeslig uses `stringOrNull` which accepts any string, then setMtvDeslig to a column of length 2. In MySQL strict mode, inserting a string longer than 2 would error and be caught by the try/catch → returns success false with error message. So not data corruption but failure. If MySQL is not strict mode, value is truncated silently, corrupting motivo. Either way, invalid motivo text is a problem: e.g., offboarding reason "Pedido de demissão" being written into mtvDeslig via config would truncate/fail. But does the config ever carry the motivo? In the seeded automation, actionConfig has no motivo; the automation payload maps `$config['motivoDesligamento'] ?? $config['mtvDeslig']`. The config for this action comes from automation action_config JSON, which the UI config (has_config: false) doesn't expose. So in the standard seed, mtvDeslig stays null. Therefore in practice the bug manifests only if someone configures the automation with a free-text motivo. Given `has_config: false` in the YAML, they can't. So low priority. Might skip this comment. Actually wait — there is a broader issue: since the payload does not map the offboarding reason to a motivo code and does not fill mtvDeslig, an S-2299 event row with status 'pendente' is created that **lacks the required motive**; the draft is intentionally pending review. The responsible will edit in the tab. The pending event row is essentially a placeholder; subsequent S-2299 transmission of that row could fail validations if the user forgets to fill. But that's existing manual behavior. OK skip. A3 (medium/god object) - per user rules, god object with duplication should be flagged before other findings. This service has 15,626 lines and adds ~490 lines with private helpers that duplicate logic and concern. Also there is an existing dedicated repository method `saveEventS2299` that already does exactly the same event creation with the same fields; the new code duplicates the field mapping in `applyEsocialS2299Payload` + `createEsocialS2299DraftEvent` instead of reusing `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::saveEventS2299`. That is concrete: the repository already centralizes creation of S-2299 event; duplicating that logic in the god service increases drift risk (e.g., the repository version and the automation version can diverge — and indeed one difference exists: repository sanitizes CPF; both do...). So this is a maintainability comment with a concrete anchor. Severity low/medium, category maintainability. Let me decide severity: For god-object/duplication, mark as "maintainability" medium. The user rule says "Sinalize isso antes de qualquer outro achado." Actually the priority says god object / duplicated logic should have the most weight and be signaled before other findings. I should produce the god-object comment as one of the comments. In ordering within the tool call maybe not that critical. A4 (low) - update path with onlyEmptyFields leaves stale data (dismissal date/motivo change not reflected while claiming "atualizado"). Anchor at line 15001: `$this->applyEsocialS2299Payload($event, $payload, $eventStatus === 'updated');`. I'll present as low/medium: on re-entry, existing values not overwritten, so a draft that had old dtDeslig is kept, despite message "atualizado a partir do offboarding". Suggestion: either truly refresh fields from offboarding (protecting only fields the user edited afterward) or don't claim updated. Medium? low. Actually, let's reconsider — is this even the intent? The eventStatus 'updated' means the automation found the event pendente and is re-running. If the user already reviewed and edited fields (like mtvDeslig), a full overwrite would wipe edits. onlyEmptyFields protects those. So the design is deliberate: only fill empties to avoid overwriting user review. Then the notification wording "foi atualizado a partir do offboarding" might be misleading but it's just wording. Since we can't be sure, and there's a defensible design, I'll downgrade to low and frame as a decision. Now the test coverage comment (issue 6, low) - lack of tests for new behavior; PR changes an unrelated SSMA test. That is legitimately a gap but per "suggest tests only for concrete changed failure modes", the failure modes exist (duplicates etc.). I'd keep it small/low or skip. I think including a test suggestion as low is reasonable, combined into other comments? I'll add low. Now let me also double-check whether the diff in executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft's "missing" metadata stores payload with motivo '' etc. Fine. Wait, one more potential real issue: **`$event?->getId()` in the return array is computed before the second flush** but after first flush, so if the event was created during this run, id already assigned after first flush (since persist+flush happened inside the try branch). Actually the event is created with persist at 15002 but no flush there; first flush at 15027 assigns the ID. Return array at 15087 reads $event->getId() — already assigned. OK. Another possible real bug: **two separate flush() calls cause extra DB round trips, and between the two flushes, if the event creation failed (exception), the first flush would throw anyway.** not a bug. Now, is there any issue with `$member->getSourceMetadata()` being read from DB entity after the first flush? Since the entity was persisted with new metadata, but the in-memory object was modified (setSourceMetadata) before flush. Flush does not reload the object, so in-memory still has the updated array (with eventId null). Re-set works. But wait — after the first flush, could Doctrine have executed an UPDATE of flow_instance_member with source_metadata including eventId null? Yes. Then second flush persists eventId. Fine but two UPDATEs. Acceptable. Alright — also verify code correctness issue with `$this->dateOrNull` and `\DateTime::createFromInterface($value)` — in dateOrNull: `if ($value instanceof \DateTimeInterface) return \DateTime::createFromInterface($value);` fine in PHP>=8. Now — templates (list_automations and flow_detail) only add labels; they also map only the key. But there may be other places where action labels/definitions must be added (e.g., list of actions allowed for product, JS form for config) - out of scope. Wait, one thing: In list_automations.html.twig they add `'create_esocial_s2299_draft': 'Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299)'` to getActionLabel. And flow_detail.html.twig adds to computeAutomationDisplayName. Both correct. Now, decide the final set of code comments: 1. Migration file - cross-tenant entitlement (medium, security/bug). Anchor existing_code = the SELECT workflows block lines 39-42. 2. AutomationExecutionService - duplication of S-2299 creation logic + god object (maintainability, medium). Anchor: `private function executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` line 14927... anchor on new method signature? existing_code could be the method declaration line. Or anchor on the duplicated mapping function createEsocialS2299DraftEvent lines 15265-15279. Better anchor the new `private function createEsocialS2299DraftEvent` to highlight duplication with repository's `saveEventS2299`. Actually anchor should reference added lines; yes those are added. 3. AutomationExecutionService - duplicate pendente events (bug, medium). Anchor line 15226 `->andWhere('event.status != :pendingStatus')`. 4. AutomationExecutionService - update path only fills empty fields (low). Anchor line 15001. 5. AutomationExecutionService - no tests (low). Maybe fold into one comment? Could skip. Also possibly comment the YAML - check for spelling errors in yaml-keys within the file. The yaml adds keys: id, type, title, icon, has_config, allowed_triggers, blocked_triggers, blocked_trigger_message, description, config_preset. Those match sibling patterns? Let me check the YAML file around the addition to see other actions using config_preset key etc. Let me read the file around lines 150-210 to compare structure with existing actions and confirm the 'type' is consistent naming (e.g., other actions type camelCase?). Also confirm config_preset nesting: they have to: "flow_responsible". Let me read surrounding YAML.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "config/automations/offboarding.yaml", "start_line": 120, "end_line": 215}
File: config/automations/offboarding.yaml (Total lines: 481)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 120-215
120|        to: "employee"
121|    
122|    # 2. Notificar responsável do fluxo
123|    - id: "notify_flow_responsible"
124|      type: "notification"
125|      title: "Notificar responsável do fluxo"
126|      icon: "fa-solid fa-user-check"
127|      has_config: false
128|      config_preset:
129|        to: "flow_responsible"
130|
131|    # 2.1 Notificar preenchimento eSocial (somente se empresa tiver eSocial habilitado)
132|    - id: "notify_esocial_worker_data"
133|      type: "notify_esocial_worker_data"
134|      title: "Notificar preenchimento de dados do trabalhador e remuneração (eSocial)"
135|      icon: "fa-solid fa-id-card-clip"
136|      has_config: false
137|      config_preset:
138|        to: "flow_responsible"
139|    
140|    # ---------------------------------------------------------
141|    # ENVIO DE E-MAILS (SMTP)
142|    # Template determinado automaticamente baseado em: trigger + destinatário
143|    # Ex: offboarding-on_all_activities_complete-employee
144|    # ---------------------------------------------------------
145|    
146|    # 3. Enviar e-mail para colaborador
147|    - id: "send_email_employee"
148|      type: "send_email"
149|      title: "Enviar e-mail para colaborador"
150|      icon: "fa-solid fa-envelope"
151|      has_config: false
152|      config_preset:
153|        to: "employee"
154|    
155|    # 4. Enviar e-mail para responsável do fluxo
156|    - id: "send_email_flow_responsible"
157|      type: "send_email"
158|      title: "Enviar e-mail para responsável do fluxo"
159|      icon: "fa-solid fa-user-gear"
160|      has_config: false
161|      config_preset:
162|        to: "flow_responsible"
163|    
164|    # ---------------------------------------------------------
165|    # NOTIFICAÇÕES ADICIONAIS
166|    # ---------------------------------------------------------
167|    
168|    - id: "send_whatsapp"
169|      type: "send_whatsapp"
170|      title: "Enviar WhatsApp para colaborador"
171|      icon: "fa-brands fa-whatsapp"
172|      has_config: false
173|
174|  movement:
175|    - id: "move_to_next_stage"
176|      type: "stage_change"
177|      title: "Mover para a próxima etapa"
178|      icon: "fa-solid fa-arrow-right"
179|      has_config: false
180|      description: "Move o colaborador para a próxima etapa do offboarding."
181|
182|    - id: "create_esocial_s2299_draft"
183|      type: "create_esocial_s2299_draft"
184|      title: "Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299)"
185|      icon: "fa-solid fa-file-lines"
186|      has_config: false
187|      allowed_triggers:
188|        - "employee_enters_stage"
189|      blocked_triggers:
190|        - "offboarding_completed"
191|        - "exit_date"
192|        - "deadline_reached"
193|        - "all_activities_completed"
194|        - "all_activities_completed_plus_days"
195|        - "any_activity_completed"
196|        - "days_in_stage"
197|        - "days_after_offboarding_start"
198|      blocked_trigger_message: "Esta ação só pode ser usada com o trigger 'Colaborador entrar nesta etapa'"
199|      description: "Cria ou atualiza o rascunho do evento S-2299 com dados do offboarding e notifica o responsável para revisar o desligamento eSocial."
200|      config_preset:
201|        to: "flow_responsible"
202|
203|  # ---------------------------------------------------------
204|  # AÇÕES DE VISIBILIDADE E ACESSO
205|  # ---------------------------------------------------------
206|  
207|  visibility:
208|    # Ação disponível APENAS na primeira etapa (ou Etapa Intermediária em flows variáveis)
209|    # Usada com trigger on_enter
210|    - id: "delay_offboarding_visibility"
211|      type: "delay_offboarding_visibility"
212|      title: "Aguardar X dias para exibir offboarding ao colaborador"
213|      icon: "fa-solid fa-eye-slash"
214|      has_config: true
215|      config_type: "dropdown"
Request #26 deepseek-v4-flash P:128.07K C:216 CR:126.85K CW:0 2499ms
Reasoning
The YAML matches existing structure. Keys are consistent. Blocked trigger name list — is `employee_enters_stage` the correct trigger identifier for "Colaborador entrar nesta etapa"? In migration they seed automations with `trigger_type` = 'on_enter'. But in the YAML allowed_triggers they use `employee_enters_stage`. Hmm. In offboarding.yaml, the existing action for movement maybe uses allowed_triggers with 'on_enter'? Let me check other entries with allowed_triggers to see the trigger naming used in YAML. Search allowed_triggers in the file.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "allowed_triggers|employee_enters_stage|on_enter", "file_patterns": ["config/automations/offboarding.yaml"]}
No matches found
Request #27 deepseek-v4-flash P:128.3K C:4.93K CR:128.26K CW:0 35670ms
Reasoning
Search within the file returns no matches (the file_read earlier displayed allowed_triggers at lines 187-188). code_search may not support that file pattern. Let me not worry — that's content not review-critical. Now I have enough to produce comments. Also check that yaml has no key typos; keys are consistent with sibling conventions. So no YAML comment. Let me now also check the diff change at line 7039 area — the other usage `'system_sender' => $config['system_sender'] ?? null` added in emailConfig array. It only applies when templateSlug or body present. In S-2299 automation, message_html and message are provided; the emailConfig is built and sent through executeSendEmail, which routes chat to assistant? Need to confirm executeSendEmail reads config['system_sender'] and uses sendChatNotification config with system_sender so that chat path goes through assistant. It probably passes config to sendChatNotification. Fine. Now, the earlier note about list automations labels — no issues. Let me finalize comment set (keeping precision, avoiding speculative low-value comments): Comment 1 (migration, medium, security): cross-tenant seeding without entitlement filter. Comment 2 (AutomationExecutionService, maintainability, medium): duplicated S-2299 event creation and normalization helpers in the god service; recommend extraction & reuse repository saveEventS2299. Anchor on `private function createEsocialS2299DraftEvent(Company $company, EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador): EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` line. Comment 3 (AutomationExecutionService, bug, medium): duplicate pendente event when a pending draft was created outside this automation (manual S-2299 tab) — `findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal` excludes 'pendente', and metadata lookup only finds events previously recorded by this flow; second event is created. Comment 4 (AutomationExecutionService, bug/low): update branch only fills empty fields (line 15001). Optional. I'll include as low, framed as a question/decision: on reruns when data changed, draft not refreshed while message claims updated. Comment 5 (test, low): no tests for new automation branches. Might include in comment about test coverage. But keep it short. Given reply limit and precision, I'll include comments 1-4 and a short low test note. Actually, comment 5 duplicates review plan issue 6; include as low maybe merged with comment on lines? We can only anchor to existing_code lines. I'll anchor the test note on the new method's beginning (`$this->entityManager->flush();`? better at the method signature). Hmm, to keep comments high-value and not noisy, I'll include 1,2,3,4 and one low test note. That's 5 comments. Wait also to consider the "god object" duplication priority rule says to signal it *before* other findings. Our first comment ordering in the tool call is not about ordering per se, but maybe ordering by severity. Let me order: migration entitlement (medium/high?), duplication (maintainability), duplicate event (bug), stale update (low), tests (low). Should the migration entitlement be high? The user rules: cross-tenant isolation "Revisar ... isolamento por empresa". Actually seeding new products/features to all tenants could be considered a high impact in production. But it's a documented behavior and only applies to companies that have the exit workflow. Let me mark severity medium with clear ask. Might be better as "medium". I'd choose medium for both. Wait, reconsider the "god object" comment. The user rule says: "Sinalize isso antes de qualquer outro achado." I could make this the first comment in the list to honor it. But the most *blocking* might be the duplicate event bug. Hmm. I'll keep order: (1) god object/duplication, (2) migration tenancy, (3) duplicate pendente event, (4) stale data on update, (5) tests. Now, I must be careful that the existing_code provided is exact text as in the diff (new lines). Let me choose anchors: For comment (god object): anchor new method's declaration from the diff: ``` private function executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array ``` This line appears in diff as added. Good. For migration tenancy anchor: ``` $workflowRows = $this->connection->fetchAllAssociative( 'SELECT id, company_id FROM workflows WHERE slug = :slug', ['slug' => self::WORKFLOW_SLUG] ); ``` Wait, but in the diff, line numbers: the actual file line numbers have `$workflowRows = $this->connection->fetchAllAssociative(` at 39. Good. For duplicate pendente anchor: added lines: ``` ->andWhere('event.status != :pendingStatus') ->setParameter('company', $company) ``` Anchor on `->andWhere('event.status != :pendingStatus')`. For stale update anchor: ``` $this->applyEsocialS2299Payload($event, $payload, $eventStatus === 'updated'); ``` Anchor on that line (15001). For tests anchor: same as first method declaration? Can't reuse same anchor. Use a different anchor: ``` } catch (\Throwable $e) { $this->log('error', 'Erro ao criar rascunho S-2299 via offboarding', [ ``` Hmm, better anchor near the top of the method where the success message is built? The tests comment doesn't need specific anchor—place at the beginning of method? Use existing_code `private function executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array` again, that duplicates with comment 1 anchor. That's problematic because code_comment tool anchors by matching consecutive lines; multiple comments may reference the same snippet but then two comments would target the same location - not ideal. I could place the tests comment on the return line `'notification' => $notification,` near end of method, but that is also part of new code. Alternatively drop the test comment to keep focus, or place it in the migration? No. Test note could anchor on the `$this->entityManager->persist($event);` line. Eh. Given the limited list, I will drop the separate low test comment and instead mention briefly inside the duplication comment? Better to keep comments clean and focused; the review instructions prefer precision over recall. But the checklist asks about tests. I'll include a low test comment anchored on the `return [` success line? Let me anchor on: ``` return [ 'success' => true, 'message' => $event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable' ``` Hmm. Actually, given the "Reply limit" and "focus", I think 4 strong comments are appropriate; I'll add the test gap as a fifth low-severity comment anchored at the method signature but that collides with the god object comment anchor. I'll place the god object comment anchored at the `private function applyEsocialS2299Payload` area instead, and the test comment anchored at the method signature line. Let me decide anchors: - God object/duplication: anchor at `private function createEsocialS2299DraftEvent(Company $company, EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador): EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` and its following lines (the new block). existing_code: ``` private function createEsocialS2299DraftEvent(Company $company, EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador): EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento { $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento(); ``` This is unique enough. - Tests: anchor at method signature: ``` private function executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array ``` Wait, comment ordering: I want god object as the first (biggest per user rule). Fine. Now, in case the 'updated'-only-empty-fields finding is truly intentional and not a defect, I worry about a false positive. But since the message/description explicitly says "Cria ou atualiza o rascunho ... com dados do offboarding", and automated behavior "atualizado a partir do offboarding" is displayed, I think flagging the semantic discrepancy is fair at low severity: ask them to confirm intent — if the draft must reflect the current offboarding state (e.g., changed dismissal date), the current update keeps stale values; if it must preserve responsible edits, then messaging should be adjusted. Low. Now cross-check migration tenancy severity again. Actually consider also that they only seed `workflow_products` with offboarding product and a *template* - the template is active (is_active=1) for every company. The product is 'fixo'. Even if the UI doesn't show product to unauthorized companies, the server-side flow engine may use product link for matching instances. Might cause offboarding flows to run for companies without the feature, producing eSocial S-2299 events in the official DB for those tenants — which could be an unintended operational/business outcome (creating eSocial records for companies not subscribed). Since the runtime action only runs when a flow instance with offboarding source enters stage, that instance would only be created if the company already used offboarding workflows... but they may start using the template that migration added. OK. Include as medium. Let me also double check duplicate-event claim with the metadata guard: `findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding` returns null if metadata has no eventId; yes. And if this offboarding is being handled by this flow for the first time, metadata empty. Then findExisting... excludes pendente. If the member already had a pendente S-2299 event (manual creation), a new event is created. Confirm the UI flow uses status 'pendente'. The controller's `saveEventS2299` uses repo `saveEventS2299` which sets status 'pendente'. Yes. I'm fairly confident about this one. Now write the comments in pt-BR, direct, concise, following the required structure, with severity and categories. One more: also ensure we comment on the templates? They add only display labels, no issue. YAML: no issue. Time to produce code_comment calls for the files (multiple comments). Then task_done. Let me draft the content: **Comment A (AutomationExecutionService, maintainability, medium)** — anchor `private function createEsocialS2299DraftEvent...` block: "A criação e o preenchimento do evento S-2299 foram implementados dentro deste service, que já é muito grande (15 mil+ linhas), duplicando o mapeamento que já existe no repositório `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::saveEventS2299`. Duas rotas que montam a mesma entidade com campos espelhados tendem a divergir (ex.: sanitização de CPF, status, campos novos), e isso dificulta teste e manutenção. O ideal é extrair a lógica nova (build/apply do payload, criação do draft e busca por eventos existentes) para um serviço próprio de offboarding→S-2299 que reuse o `saveEventS2299`/repositório; os helpers de normalização também já existem em outros pontos e não precisam ser copiados." **Comment B (migration, security, medium)** — anchor SELECT workflows block: "Esta migration semeia produto/template/automações de offboarding em todas as empresas que possuem o workflow 'fluxo-de-saida', sem verificar se a empresa tem o produto offboarding habilitado no pacote/features (o acesso a offboarding é controlado por empresa no ServicePackage/CompanyAppVisibilityService). Em produção isso pode liberar o fluxo de offboarding e a criação de rascunho S-2299 para clientes que não contrataram o módulo. Confirmar se a intenção é mesmo global; se não, adicionar filtro por empresa (produto ativo/feature) antes de semear — ou registrar explicitamente no doc e no plano de validação por tenant." **Comment C (AutomationExecutionService, bug, medium)** — anchor `->andWhere('event.status != :pendingStatus')`: "Quando já existe um rascunho pendente de S-2299 criado fora desta automação (ex.: salvo manualmente na aba de desligamento, que também grava com status 'pendente'), a busca acima ignora eventos pendentes e a busca por metadata só enxerga eventos criados pela própria automação. Resultado: a ação cria um segundo evento pendente para o mesmo desligamento, contrariando a premissa de idempotência descrita na PR e podendo gerar S-2299 duplicado no envio. Ajustar para localizar e reaproveitar (atualizar) eventos pendentes do mesmo colaborador/data, ou tratar explicitamente esse caso como 'already_exists'." **Comment D (AutomationExecutionService, bug/low)** — anchor the apply line: "Na reexecução (evento pendente já existente), o payload só preenche campos vazios (`onlyEmptyFields`). Se a data de desligamento ou outro dado mudou no offboarding depois da primeira execução, o rascunho mantém o valor antigo, embora a notificação diga que ele foi 'atualizado a partir do offboarding'. Definir a regra: ou o rascunho deve refletir os dados atuais do offboarding (sobrescrevendo), ou a mensagem precisa deixar claro que só campos vazios foram preenchidos." **Comment E (tests low)** — anchor method signature: "Esta lógica nova de negócio (criação/atualização do draft, casos 'missing', evento já oficial, idempotência e isolamento por empresa) não tem teste automatizado; a PR só renomeia/ajusta um teste de SSMA não relacionado. Recomendo adicionar testes unitários/integração cobrindo esses ramos antes do merge para evitar regressão silenciosa." Now, per instructions, I should avoid duplicating what deterministic tooling enforces, etc. These are fine. Category values: A=maintainability, B=security, C=bug, D=bug, E=test. Severity: A=medium, B=medium (or high). I'll set B medium. C=medium. D=low. E=low. Order of tool comments: The user rule says god-object finding should come first (greatest weight). I'll order them A (maintainability), B (security), C (bug), D, E. Actually, the code_comment tool doesn't guarantee ordering by severity; but we can pass in the listed order. Let me finalize the exact anchors ensuring they exist in the added lines: - A anchor lines: from file: ``` private function createEsocialS2299DraftEvent(Company $company, EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador): EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento { $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento(); ``` These are added lines, matches diff. - B anchor lines: ``` $workflowRows = $this->connection->fetchAllAssociative( 'SELECT id, company_id FROM workflows WHERE slug = :slug', ['slug' => self::WORKFLOW_SLUG] ); ``` Matches added lines. - C anchor: `->andWhere('event.status != :pendingStatus')` (added). Provide a few lines maybe: ``` ->andWhere('event.status != :pendingStatus') ->setParameter('company', $company) ``` These are in new code; diff shows with `+` markers. - D anchor: `$this->applyEsocialS2299Payload($event, $payload, $eventStatus === 'updated');` matches. - E anchor: `private function executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array` matches. Let me produce the code_comment call.
Tool Calls (1)
code_comment
Show Details
{"comments": [{"path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "content": "A criação e o preenchimento do evento S-2299 foram implementados dentro deste service, que já é um god object com mais de 15 mil linhas, duplicando o mapeamento de campos que já existe em `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::saveEventS2299` (mesmos setters/status 'pendente', criação em modo INC etc.). Duas rotas espelhadas de montagem da mesma entidade tendem a divergir com o tempo (ex.: sanitização de CPF/CNPJ, novos campos, regras de status), e os helpers novos de normalização (`dateOrNull`, `cpfOrNull`, `onlyDigits`, etc.) provavelmente já existem em outros pontos do código. O recomendado é extrair toda a lógica de rascunho S-2299 (criar/buscar/atualizar evento + montar payload) para um serviço dedicado de offboarding→eSocial que reutilize o repositório existente, em vez de manter ~500 linhas novas concentradas aqui; isso também facilita testes isolados dos ramos de negócio.", "existing_code": "    private function createEsocialS2299DraftEvent(Company $company, EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador): EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento\n    {\n        $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();", "category": "maintainability", "severity": "medium"}, {"path": "migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php", "content": "A migration semeia produto, template e automações de offboarding em todas as empresas que possuem o workflow `fluxo-de-saida`, sem verificar se cada empresa tem o módulo offboarding habilitado (o acesso é controlado por empresa via service package/features, ex.: `ServicePackage::FEATURES['offboarding']` e `CompanyAppVisibilityService`). Em produção isso pode liberar o fluxo de offboarding e a criação de rascunho S-2299 (inclusive gerando eventos eSocial oficiais) para clientes que não contrataram o módulo, e dificulta rollback seletivo por tenant. Confirmar se a intenção é mesmo global; se houver regra de elegibilidade por empresa, aplicar o mesmo filtro aqui antes do INSERT, ou ao menos deixar explícito no doc e no plano de validação por empresa que o seed é intencional para todos os tenants.", "existing_code": "        $workflowRows = $this->connection->fetchAllAssociative(\n            'SELECT id, company_id FROM workflows WHERE slug = :slug',\n            ['slug' => self::WORKFLOW_SLUG]\n        );", "category": "security", "severity": "medium"}, {"path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "content": "Quando já existe um rascunho pendente de S-2299 criado fora desta automação — por exemplo, salvo manualmente na aba de desligamento/eSocial do colaborador, que também grava com status `pendente` via `saveEventS2299` — esta busca ignora eventos pendentes e a busca por `sourceMetadata` só encontra eventos criados pela própria automação em execuções anteriores. Resultado prático: a ação cria um segundo evento pendente para o mesmo desligamento, contrariando a premissa de idempotência descrita na PR e podendo gerar S-2299 duplicado no envio oficial. Ajustar para localizar e reaproveitar (atualizar) eventos pendentes do mesmo colaborador/data de desligamento, ou tratar explicitamente esse caso como evento já existente.", "existing_code": "            ->andWhere('event.status != :pendingStatus')\n            ->setParameter('company', $company)", "category": "bug", "severity": "medium"}, {"path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "content": "Na reexecução (evento pendente já localizado), o payload só preenche campos vazios (`onlyEmptyFields = true`). Se a data de desligamento ou outro dado mudar no offboarding depois da primeira execução, o rascunho mantém o valor antigo mesmo assim — enquanto a notificação e o retorno dizem que o rascunho foi \"atualizado a partir do offboarding\". Definir a regra de forma explícita: ou o rascunho reflete os dados atuais do offboarding (sobrescrevendo campos), ou a mensagem deve deixar claro que apenas campos vazios foram preenchidos para não induzir o responsável ao erro de achar que a mudança foi propagada.", "existing_code": "                        $this->applyEsocialS2299Payload($event, $payload, $eventStatus === 'updated');", "category": "bug", "severity": "low"}, {"path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "content": "Lógica nova de negócio com persistência e notificação (criação/atualização do draft, casos de dados eSocial ausentes, evento já oficial, idempotência e isolamento por empresa) não tem teste automatizado; a única mudança em testes desta PR é um ajuste de nome/campo num teste de SSMA não relacionado. Recomendo adicionar testes unitários/integração cobrindo esses ramos antes do merge, especialmente o cenário de evento pendente pré-existente (evitar duplicidade) e o de reexecução com dados alterados.", "existing_code": "    private function executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array", "category": "test", "severity": "low"}]}
(async)
Request #28 deepseek-v4-flash P:133.25K C:506 CR:133.12K CW:0 4669ms
Reasoning
The comments have been placed. Now let me do a final pass to ensure I addressed every file in <review_files>: 1. `config/automations/offboarding.yaml` — checked YAML key spelling and structure: no issues. 2. `migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php` — reviewed fully; commented tenancy/entitlement concern. 3. `src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php` — reviewed; commented god-object duplication, duplicate pending events, only-empty update semantics, missing tests. 4. `templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig` — adds label mapping only; correct. 5. `templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig` — adds label mapping only; correct. All files covered. Call task_done.
Revisei os cinco arquivos do grupo de review. Resumo do que foi analisado: - **`config/automations/offboarding.yaml`** — estrutura e chaves consistentes com as ações vizinhas (sem erro de digitação em chaves YAML). - **`migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php`** — fluxo idempotente por workflow, mas com seed global para todos os tenants sem filtro de elegibilidade por empresa; registrado como atenção. - **`src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php`** — lógica nova concentrada no god object com duplicação do mapeamento existente em `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::saveEventS2299`; risco de duplicidade de evento pendente pré-existente fora da automação; semântica de "atualização" que só preenche campos vazios; ausência de testes para os novos ramos. - **`templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig`** e **`flow_detail.html.twig`** — apenas rótulos de exibição adicionados, sem problema funcional. Os comentários foram ancorados no diff; concluo a tarefa.
Tool Calls (1)
task_done
Show Details
{"state": "DONE"}
Request #29 deepseek-v4-flash P:25.51K C:7.6K CR:18.94K CW:0 51721ms
Reasoning
Let me analyze the code changes in detail to identify issues beyond the confirmed findings. Let me start by understanding the changes: 1. `config/automations/offboarding.yaml` - adds a new automation action `create_esocial_s2299_draft` definition. 2. `migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php` - new migration that seeds offboarding eSocial flow templates. 3. `src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php` - adds execution for `create_esocial_s2299_draft` action and changes system sender logic for notifications. 4. `templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig` and `flow_detail.html.twig` - add labels. Let me carefully review each file. Let me first read relevant code to verify things. Let me check the details of the AutomationExecutionService changes. Key things to check: 1. In `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, the notification uses `system_sender` = true with `'to' => 'company_member'`. Previously there was code in executeNotify that checked `$config['system_sender']` - let me check how that field is added. Actually, in the diff, the `system_sender` is being read from config `$config['system_sender'] ?? null`. That seems fine. 2. In `buildEsocialS2299ReviewUrl`, it generates route `my_company_member_manage`. The notification message says "Abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar os detalhes" and there's a button that links directly to the review URL. Wait — the PR description says "O botão 'ver detalhes' direciona para o chat com a Adriana, onde fica a orientação para revisar o desligamento." But the code generates a review button that links to `$reviewUrl` which is `my_company_member_manage?...esocialTab=desligamento`. Hmm, but that's how it works maybe. Let me look at more potential issues: ### Potential Issue: `findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal` uses `->andWhere('event.dtDeslig = :dismissalDate')` with formatted date string `$dismissalDate->format('Y-m-d')` is a string parameter compared against `event.dtDeslig`. Depending on the Doctrine column type, if it's a `date` type, comparison against a string in DQL should work via parameter type inference. That's likely fine. ### Potential Issue: idempotency issue The logic: - If `$esocialTrabalhador` exists and `$remuneracao` exists: - `$event = findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding(...)` - only finds event linked via metadata and status 'pendente' (actually it just finds the event by metadata eventId and checks match, regardless of status... wait no). Actually, let me re-read: ```php $event = $this->findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding($member, $offboardingMember, $company, $esocialTrabalhador, $remuneracao); if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $event->getStatus() !== 'pendente') { $eventStatus = 'existing_not_editable'; } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) { $event->setUpdatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable()); $eventStatus = 'updated'; } else { $event = $this->findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal($company, $esocialTrabalhador, $remuneracao, $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate()); if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) { $eventStatus = 'existing_not_editable'; } else { $event = $this->createEsocialS2299DraftEvent($company, $esocialTrabalhador); $eventStatus = 'created'; } } ``` Interesting: `findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding` does not filter by status 'pendente'. It uses `esocialS2299EventMatchesContext`. So the metadata-linked event could be an official (non-pendente) event. In that case eventStatus = 'existing_not_editable'. If the event is pendente, eventStatus = 'updated'. But then, `findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal` ignores 'pendente' events and only looks for official events (status != 'pendente'). So if there's an existing official event, it's 'existing_not_editable'. Now there's an important subtle bug: When creating a new draft event with `createEsocialS2299DraftEvent`, the event is created with `setStatus('pendente')`, `setCreatedAt`, etc. But it's NOT checking whether a pendente event already exists for the same context (company + trabalhador + remuneracao + dismissal date) that wasn't created by this automation (no metadata link). This was already flagged in confirmed finding #3. But wait, there's another subtle issue: in the flow where `findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding` returns an event with status != 'pendente' -> `existing_not_editable`. Hmm — but in that branch, the draft isn't updated. Now, another concern: The second flush. After the first flush, code re-fetches metadata and sets eventId: ```php if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) { $metadata = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? []; $metadata['esocialS2299Draft']['eventId'] = $event->getId(); ... } ``` Wait - this assumes `$metadata['esocialS2299Draft']` exists as array. It was set above with eventId => $event?->getId() which at that point was null for a new event. Then after flush, they set eventId. This second block only runs when `$event` is a real event, which is the case when worker+remuneration exist. So `metadata['esocialS2299Draft']` exists. OK. But wait, when `$event` is null (missing data), the metadata includes `eventId => null`, and no second update. OK. Hmm, but there's a subtle logic issue: the `$eventStatus` 'existing_not_editable' path — after they set metadata eventId to existing event's ID and flush. Then notification says "S-2299 oficial já existe e não foi alterado". That's OK. ### Potential issue: Event created but never flushed when esocialTrabalhador/remuneracao missing... Actually no, if missing, event is null. ### Potential Issue: `$event->setDadosRemuneracao($remuneracao);` then applyEsocialS2299Payload... then persist only if eventStatus != existing_not_editable. Hmm, they also don't set other required data for new event: The event created via `createEsocialS2299DraftEvent` sets `tpInscTransmissor(1)`, `nrInscTransmissor`, `indRetif(1)`, `status('pendente')`, modo 'INC', tpAmb. But they never set e.g. `nrRecibo`? For new event not needed. Might need `matricula`/`cpfTrab`? Actually the trabalhador association provides that. Let me check the entity EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento to understand required fields and whether setting `dtDeslig` etc. is done. There's `$event->setDadosRemuneracao($remuneracao)`. For the existing code in `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::saveEventS2299`, let me compare. But the confirmed finding #2 already covers the duplication. ### Potential Issue: `executeNotify` merge context uses 'member_id' => companyMember id, but 'to' => 'company_member' means the notification is sent to the responsible. Wait: ```php $notification = $this->executeNotify([ 'to' => 'company_member', 'company_member_id' => (string) $responsible->getId(), ... ], $member, array_merge($context, [ 'member_id' => (string) $companyMember->getId(), ... ])); ``` The 'to' => 'company_member' with company_member_id = responsible. OK, this sends to the responsible (notifying them about the dismissed member). That matches intent: "notifica o responsável para revisar o desligamento eSocial". Hmm, but wait — actually is this a chat with Adriana message? The new `system_sender` flag ensures message is sent from system "Adriana". But title says "Revisar desligamento eSocial (S-2299)". The notification's message is like a chat message from Adriana to the responsible. The `system_sender` logic was in executeNotify which now generalizes to system sender (not just payroll). OK. But hold on - the flow responsible receives this via `company_member` - Actually maybe we should double check that 'company_member' recipient resolves to the responsible id... Not sure. ### Potential issue: `config_preset: to: flow_responsible` in YAML, but the executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft notification always sends to 'company_member' with company_member_id = responsible->getId(). Wait — the notification inside executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft is hard-coded to company_member = responsible. And `config_preset.to = flow_responsible` is for the YAML automation config editor? Actually, the `to` config value in the yaml automation presets is just UI default config for a "notify" action? Hmm — this YAML action `create_esocial_s2299_draft` has `config_preset: to: flow_responsible`, which means when the user adds this action to a trigger, its default config has `to => flow_responsible`. But does executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft use `$config['to']`? No, it resolves responsible via resolveEsocialS2299Responsible and always notifies the responsible. The `to` config is likely unused. Minor, maybe not worth reporting. ### Potential Issue: re notify - `resolveEsocialS2299Responsible` — config['responsible_id'], etc. But config from the automation would contain the `config` JSON set in flow_automations.action_config, e.g. `{'to': 'flow_responsible', '_default_automation_id': ...}`. So `$config` might not contain company_member_id etc. But this is context-dependent. Not a real bug per se. ### Potential Issue: The `member_id` in the merged context is the offboarding company member, but `$member` passed to executeNotify is a FlowInstanceMember (offboarding flow member). Let me check executeNotify contract: `executeNotify($config, $member, $context)`. The member is used to identify source for chat messages. For notifications 'to' => 'company_member', they pass company_member_id explicitly, so fine. Wait, actually, careful: The chat between Adriana and the responsible... In `executeNotify`, `$member` being a FlowInstanceMember of type offboarding may determine context; but the actual recipient is company_member = responsible. In the system_sender branch, they get the assistant conversation for the user. That's user = the recipient. Good. Let me not go too deep here since it requires reading executeNotify fully. ### Potential issue with the notification button linking to `my_company_member_manage` review URL. Let's verify route name. `buildEsocialS2299ReviewUrl` uses route 'my_company_member_manage' with param 'member'. Need to confirm that route exists and this generates URL in member management context. Since we can't be fully sure, but that route is presumably existing in the codebase. Let me search. ### Potential bug: `esocialS2299EventMatchesContext` treats missing dismissal dates as matching (returns true). OK. ### Potential bug: If `$eventStatus === 'updated'` and the event is linked from metadata but currently status pendente, then the code calls `$event->setUpdatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable()); $eventStatus='updated';` — then applies payload with onlyEmptyFields = true. If data in the offboarding changed (dismissal date changed), the payload's dataDesligamento might differ but existing event field dtDeslig not empty, so not updated — bug already flagged in confirmed #4. But wait — actually consider this: `findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding` uses `esocialS2299EventMatchesContext` comparing dismissal date with the event's `dtDeslig`. If dismissal date changed in offboarding, the match fails (dates differ), returning null. Then `findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal` searches for an official event (status != pendente) for the new date... It wouldn't find the old pendente draft with old date. Then `createEsocialS2299DraftEvent` creates a NEW pendente draft. So you'd now have two pendente drafts for the same worker — one old (with old date) and one new. This is a duplicate-draft issue; also, the old pendente draft remains. Hmm wait, is there a uniqueness constraint? Possibly unique on (company, trabalhador, remuneracao, dtDeslig)? Not sure. The old draft with old date stays, plus new draft created. Not flagged yet. Actually this is arguably within confirmed finding #4's spirit but it's a distinct issue: creating duplicate drafts when the dismissal date changes. But confirmed #4 says only-empty-fields update issue. And #3 says existing pendente draft outside automation ignored. This case is within those. Might be borderline to re-report; instruction says do not repeat confirmed findings. This new aspect — changing dismissal date causes duplicate pendente drafts even for drafts created by the automation itself (metadata event match fails because dates differ, then create new). Actually wait — if it matches dates but doesn't update fields... let's analyze carefully: If the automation ran once (draft created with date D1 and eventId stored in metadata). Then the offboarding dismissal date changes to D2. Re-run: `findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding` -> matches context but compares D1 vs D2 -> mismatch -> returns null. Then `findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal` for D2: looks for non-pendente event with D2. The existing draft with D1 is pendente -> skipped. So no event found -> `createEsocialS2299DraftEvent` creates a new draft with D2. Now two pendente drafts exist (D1 and D2) for same worker. This contradicts the "idempotent, não deve duplicar evento pendente já existente para o mesmo contexto" claim — though arguably they're different contexts (different dates). And the update path (`eventStatus='updated'` with onlyEmptyFields) wouldn't fix dtDeslig because it differs anyway. This is somewhat a real logic issue: when dismissal date changes, you create a new draft instead of updating the existing draft, and the old draft never gets superseded. But is that "same context"? The dismissal date changed so arguably a new event is correct, but the old draft should probably be removed/deactivated. Leaving stale pendente drafts in eSocial queue could cause duplicates when submitted. Actually, the search `findExisting...` excludes 'pendente'. So with an old pendente draft (D1) and a new pendente draft (D2), if the responsible edits the D2 draft in the UI and submits, then D1 remains pendente... but D1's date D1 may still be a legit pending dismissal? Unclear. I think it's worth mentioning? Might be overlapping with confirmed #3/#4. Hmm. The instruction: "Do not repeat them." I'd rather not re-report overlapping. Let me look for other distinct issues. ### Migration review Migration details: - `isTransactional(): bool { return false; }` — data migrations with DDL maybe not possible. OK. - `up()`: - Checks tables exist. - Finds active product offboarding by slug. If none, return silently. - Fetches workflows with slug 'fluxo-de-saida'. This is cross-company (all companies) — flagged in confirmed #1 (doesn't check module enabled per company). - For each workflow: ensureWorkflowProduct; ensureTemplate; ensureTemplateProduct; ensureOffboardingStages. - `ensureStage` looks up by name case-insensitive, per template/product. Uses product_slot_index IS NULL. - Down(): finds templates by seed_migration in settings; deletes workflow_products created; deactivates template. Potential migration bugs: 1. `ensureOffboardingStages` — the stages names include e.g. 'Etapa 1 - Preparação'. But `ensureStage` uses `product_slot_index IS NULL` in its existence check. But ensureTemplateProduct inserts a flow_template_product with slot_index = 0 for the offboarding product. In flow_stages, stage product_slot_index presumably is a null-or-value. For product-based stages... OK. 2. `ensureStage` insert: `INSERT INTO flow_stages (flow_template_id, product_id, name, description, order_index, advance_rules, stage_category, phase_number, product_slot_index) VALUES (..., NULL, NULL, NULL)`. They pass advanceRules json. OK. But hold on: Is `flow_stages.product_slot_index` a column in schema? It's referenced in ensureStage SELECT and INSERT, so presumably exists (used elsewhere). Not sure. 3. Duplicate automation insertion: ensureAutomation checks name+trigger+action. On second run, stages and automations exist; nothing duplicated. Good. Templates insert via seed key check. workflow_products via existence check. 4. Idempotency concern: In down(), DELETE from workflow_products only if settings['workflow_product_was_created'] true and no other active template references it. OK. 5. **Non-transactional migration with `isTransactional=false`** — if a failure happens mid-way (after ensureTemplate insert for workflow 1 of N), partial data left. That's inherent; but usually migration failure aborts remaining. If it fails after some, re-running is idempotent thanks to checks. OK. 6. Migration up() runs raw SQL queries using `$this->connection->fetchAllAssociative`, etc. `executeStatement` etc. OK. 7. **Potential issue**: In `up()`, `ensureTemplate` inserts template with `template_category = 'offboarding_esocial'`. Is that a valid enum value for flow_templates.template_category column? If the column is an enum or has constraints, this might fail. Let me search the codebase for template_category values. 8. **Potential issue**: `flow_templates` may have columns like `version`, `is_default`, `created_by`, etc. that are NOT NULL without defaults; inserting minimal columns could violate DB constraints. Should check the schema/entity to see NOT NULL columns. Let me read FlowTemplate entity. Also, the settings `seed_migration` JSON_EXTRACT matching. In down(), matching `JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, '$.seed_migration')) = :seed` — fine. 9. Note in down() there is a subtle problem: They query templates with seed_migration; then inside the loop for each template, delete workflow_product. But if the same workflow had multiple templates seeded with the same key? ensureTemplate returns existing by workflow+seed; so only one template per workflow. OK. 10. **Concerning**: The migration runs against ALL companies with the workflow slug 'fluxo-de-saida'. Offboarding might be used by companies... flagged #1. 11. Missing doc file? The rules say migration must have doc in `docs/database-changes/`. The PR description says documentation created at `docs/database-changes/2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template.md`. But that file isn't in the review group (only 10 files changed; other changed files don't include it?). Actually the PR description lists files changed: php=4, twig=3, md=2. Two md files presumably include docs and the guide. The listed <other_changed_files> only shows 3 files, plus review files 5 files. md files are not in the diff shown but PR-level changed files include them. Since md files aren't in review_files, and the doc apparently exists in the PR (evidenced by guard test passing), no need to flag. ### AutomationExecutionService Let me focus on the changes beyond confirmed findings: a) The `system_sender` change generalized the payroll system sender logic. Search for other references that previously named `$isPayrollSystemSender`. This refactor: previously only payroll members had system sender. Now any config with `system_sender => true` gets system sender. New code path uses `'system_sender' => true`. This seems intentional. But wait: does `executeNotify` filter/sanitize config? The system_sender is added to `$emailConfig` as part of emailConfig? Let me check the context around lines 7039-7041: inside a loop maybe constructing `$emailConfig` for `executeSendEmail`... Actually we need context. Let me read file around those lines to understand. Actually line 7039-7041: ```php $emailConfig = [ ... 'record_name' => $config['record_name'] ?? null, 'system_sender' => $config['system_sender'] ?? null, ]; if (filter_var($config['skip_auto_email_template'] ?? false, FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN)) { $emailConfig['skip_auto_email_template'] = true; } ``` Let me read the surrounding code to know which method this is in (maybe executeSendEmail or email notification). Need context. b) In `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, notification message templates include `{{member_name}}` placeholder; presumably replaced somewhere. But message_html also uses placeholders. Wait, they already compose full html with reviewButtonHtml appended AFTER placeholders remain? Look: ```php $reviewButtonHtml = '<p ...><a href="' . htmlspecialchars($reviewUrl...) . '">Revisar desligamento eSocial</a></p>'; $notificationMessageHtml = ... '<p>...{{member_name}}...</p>'; $notification = $this->executeNotify([ 'title' => $notificationTitle, 'message' => $notificationMessage, 'message_html' => $notificationMessageHtml . $reviewButtonHtml, ... ``` So message_html contains literal `{{member_name}}` placeholder text and the appended button HTML. If executeNotify replaces `{{member_name}}` in message_html (given member context), then fine; the button html with URL is appended after. The button is an HTML link to the member manage page, not chat with Adriana. But the message text tells user to "Abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar". Hmm. Actually wait, does the notification go to the chat with Adriana as an AI-assistant conversation message? With `system_sender` true, the code path sends to assistant conversation. Then message_html is presumably rendered in the chat. And the button link points to member manage page with esocialTab=desligamento. That is a deep link to review the S-2299. That seems fine. c) `htmlspecialchars($reviewUrl...)` used inside message_html. reviewUrl is a generated URL from router using member id; safe. d) Potential XSS: The notification message includes placeholders; presumably the notification subsystem handles member_name escaping? Not our concern. e) Timezone/`new \DateTime($value)` could throw on weird formats but caught by \Throwable. f) `decimalOrNull`: normalizes 'R$ 1.234,56' etc. But `number_format((float) $normalized, 2, '.', '')`. Edge: '1.234,56' -> remove '.' -> '1234,56' -> replace ',' '.' -> '1234.56' -> numeric -> number_format 1234.56. Good. But '1,234.56' (US format) -> str_contains ',' true -> remove '.' => '1,23456'?? Wait no: for '1,234.56', normalized has ',', so remove '.' gives '1,23456', replace ',' with '.' -> '1.23456' -> numeric -> number_format = '1.23'. Hmm — mis-parses US-format thousand separators. Brazilian locale probably, but the code is ambiguous. Minor, maybe skip. g) `onlyDigits` — fine. h) In `resolveEsocialS2299Responsible`, `$config['responsible_id']` etc. — probably unused but OK. i) In `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, if `$eventStatus === 'existing_not_editable'`, event is NOT persisted and NOT changed, but still references `$event->setDadosRemuneracao(...)`? Let's re-read: ```php if ($eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable') { $event->setDadosRemuneracao($remuneracao); $this->applyEsocialS2299Payload($event, $payload, $eventStatus === 'updated'); $this->entityManager->persist($event); } ``` OK, for existing_not_editable no changes. Good. But wait — inside the elseif branch for updated event, there's `$event->setUpdatedAt(...)` and status updated; and the `if ($eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable')` block persists. Fine. Potential: In branch 'created', event gets persisted but `setUpdatedAt` never called. Not a functional bug since created_at set. j) There is a subtle issue: The created draft event does NOT set the `dadosRemuneracao` before persist? Yes, in the persist block: `$event->setDadosRemuneracao($remuneracao);` yes. Also `$event->setEsocialTrabalhador($esocialTrabalhador);` in create. Good. k) Consider the scenario where esocialTrabalhador exists but remuneration is missing: eventStatus remains 'draft_only', missing[] includes esocial_remuneration_data, and metadata stored with eventId null. Notification titled "Dados eSocial pendentes..." sent. Fine. l) Potential issue: In the branch where the event was created fresh but the responsible... Actually let me check for the second flush causing two flushes; acceptable. m) **Notice a possible logic bug**: After creating/updating event and flushing, they set eventId metadata and flush again. But the metadata variable is re-read from `$member->getSourceMetadata()` which was set earlier and persisted? Actually, after the first flush, does `$member->getSourceMetadata()` return the metadata they set before flush? They set `$member->setSourceMetadata($metadata); $this->entityManager->persist($member); $this->entityManager->flush();`. Then read `$member->getSourceMetadata()`, which should return the same array. Fine. n) **Missing permission check**: The automation action runs in offboarding context and resolves a responsible; it notifies the responsible with the review URL for the dismissed member (member manage). Authorization of the responsible to see that member presumably fine because responsible belongs to the flow. Fine. o) Actually, there's an issue with respect to `onlyEmptyFields` when eventStatus = 'created': In the persist block, applyEsocialS2299Payload with onlyEmptyFields = false for 'created'. Good. p) What about `$config['dataConcessaoAviso']` etc. — the payload keys map to fields; since the automation action has `has_config: false`, there's no config UI, so all config values come from... `$config` = action_config. The YAML seeded automation has actionConfig only `to` and `_default_automation_id`. So most payload fields will be empty — meaning event will be created with only motivoDesligamento and dataDesligamento? Wait, those also come from `$config['motivoDesligamento'] ?? ...`. Since config has none, empty -> payload empty -> mtvDeslig null, dtDeslig from offboardingMember->getDismissalDate(). Hmm, so the draft is created with dataDesligamento but no motivo. That's just a "draft" for review; okay presumably. q) **Data type issue in notification message**: `$notificationMessage` uses `{{member_name}}`. In executeNotify, does member_name get substituted? If not, message displays literal `{{member_name}}`. Let me examine executeNotify to see how it handles `{{member_name}}` placeholder. Let me read the executeNotify method and code around. Also check what 'to' => 'company_member' expects, whether it uses context member_id. Actually, this calls `$this->executeNotify($config, $member, $context)` where `$member` is FlowInstanceMember (the flow instance member for offboarding), not the CompanyMembers being dismissed. executeNotify presumably supports FlowInstanceMember. And the message placeholder `{{member_name}}` will be replaced with the member's name. Which member? Possibly the context member_id or the passed member. The passed `$member` is the FlowInstanceMember... whose associated member may not be the dismissed employee? Wait, actually for offboarding, the FlowInstanceMember is the employee in the offboarding flow. So member_name would be the employee being dismissed. Good. Actually the FlowInstanceMember in offboarding typically represents the employee going through the offboarding. `sourceType='offboarding'`. So fine. But careful: The metadata is stored on the FlowInstanceMember representing the dismissed employee. Good. Let me now consider the $context merge: they set 'member_id' => companyMember id. But executeNotify's 'to' => 'company_member' expects company_member_id maybe. They supply company_member_id => responsible. Wait, 'to' => 'company_member' but they intend recipient = responsible who is the flow responsible, not necessarily the dismissed member. So they set company_member_id = responsible id. That means the notification is sent TO the responsible company member. And in the chat message the member context (employee) should be the dismissed member for member_name substitution. Let me examine how executeNotify resolves the recipient and the substitution. Need to read executeNotify. Let me search/read the code around executeNotify and the notify action dispatch (send notification). Read AutomationExecutionService file around relevant lines. Let me also verify route 'my_company_member_manage' exists. Let me also examine the repository `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository` saveEventS2299 to compare required columns, and the entity fields for getters used (e.g., `getInsConsig`, `setInsConsig`? Wait, in apply payload they use `$event->getInsConsig()`, but payload maps 'matriculaInstituicao' -> setInsConsig — hmm, that field naming seems odd: `matriculaInstituicao` maps to `InsConsig` (instituição consignatária?). Actually in S-2299, `insConsig` is the consignatária institution. Might be intended. Let me read the entity to verify setter/method names exist. Search for EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento. Let me read the file near executeNotify. First find it. I need to check: 1. executeNotify definition and handling of system_sender (that the refactor to `$isSystemSender` is sound; check they updated all uses of `$isPayrollSystemSender` variable). 2. Route name. 3. Entity methods existence and fields required. 4. FlowTemplate entity columns to validate migration inserts. Let me do parallel searches. Let me search for `function executeNotify`. Also check imports: new `use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;` added. Also references to `EsocialDadosRemuneracao::findByTrabalhador` and `EsocialDadosTrabalhador` class used; are they imported at top? They may be imported already. Let me check. Also the new private methods use `\App\Entity\OffboardingMember` fully qualified, but uses `CompanyMembers`, `Company`, `EsocialDadosTrabalhador`, `EsocialDadosRemuneracao` as short names — verify imports exist. Let me search the file for the imports and method definitions. Another thing: In `executeNotify` changes, they set `$emailConfig['system_sender']`. Wait, that was inside the notify building maybe for emails, not chat. The comment near diff line 7039 (from changed code around 7039) — context? Let me read. Also check "blocked_trigger_message" in yaml: The action has allowed_triggers only employee_enters_stage and blocked list. OK. Also, yaml rule: check spelling errors in yaml-keys within YAML files; ignore values. Keys look: `id`, `type`, `title`, `icon`, `has_config`, `allowed_triggers`, `blocked_triggers`, `blocked_trigger_message`, `description`, `config_preset`. Looks consistent with existing. Now let's check confirmations about notifications. Let me read around line 7000-7060 in the file. I'll run searches. Also let me verify `EsocialDadosRemuneracao::findByTrabalhador` signature—might return ?EsocialDadosRemuneracao. OK. Also check `company_member_manage` route exists; if not the generated URL will throw RouteNotFoundException inside try/catch, caught -> error message. If route param is wrong, error. Let me search the codebase for `my_company_member_manage`. Let me begin reading. I'll do multiple parallel tool calls.
Tool Calls (3)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "function executeNotify", "file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"]}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 2
6896|    private function executeNotifyEsocialWorkerData(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
6930|    private function executeNotify(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array

code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "my_company_member_manage"}
File: config/routes.yaml
Match lines: 2
1318|my_company_member_manage:
1322|my_company_member_manage_v2:

File: src/Controller/CompanyController.php
Match lines: 5
2855|     * Ficha do colaborador V2 (design Figma). Rota: my_company_member_manage_v2.
2961|                            return $this->redirectToRoute('my_company_member_manage_v2', ['member' => $member]);
3014|                            return $this->redirectToRoute('my_company_member_manage_v2', ['member' => $member]);
3018|                            return $this->redirectToRoute('my_company_member_manage_v2', ['member' => $member]);
3060|                        return $this->redirectToRoute('my_company_member_manage_v2', ['member' => $member]);

File: src/Controller/DecisionSystemRiskIntelligenceController.php
Match lines: 10
2708|                'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
3081|                'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
3429|                'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
3837|                'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
4318|                'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
4856|                'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
5410|                'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
5835|                'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
5978|                'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
6591|                'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,

File: src/Controller/Finance/PayrollFinanceController.php
Match lines: 1
3591|            $actionUrl = $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', $params) . '#dados_colaborador';

File: src/Controller/MetaHuman/ProfessionalDecisionSheetController.php
Match lines: 1
57|            'classicProfileUrl' => $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage_v2', ['member' => $member]),

File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 1
15319|            ? $this->router->generate('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => $companyMember->getId()])

File: src/Service/Ontology/OntologySignalBridgeService.php
Match lines: 1
1977|            'profile_url' => $this->urlGenerator->generate('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => $memberId]),

File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/RiskSignalsPresenter.php
Match lines: 1
901|                ? $this->urlGenerator->generate('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => $memberId])

File: templates/ai_committee/partials/_specialized_hub_parties_section.html.twig
Match lines: 1
26|                        {% set profileUrl = memberId ? path('my_company_member_manage', {member: memberId}) : '' %}

File: templates/calendar_member/tabs/_permissions_tab.html.twig
Match lines: 1
507|                                            href="{{ path('my_company_member_manage', { 'member': m.id }) }}"

File: templates/company/member.html.twig
Match lines: 2
120|                            <form action="{{ path('my_company_member_manage', {'member': member.id}) }}" method="post">
273|            url: '{{path('my_company_member_manage', {'member': member.id})}}',

File: templates/company/member_v2_figma.html.twig
Match lines: 2
823|                <form id="member-edit-form" action="{{ path('my_company_member_manage', {'member': member.id}) }}" method="post">
1390|        url: '{{ path('my_company_member_manage', {'member': member.id}) }}',

File: templates/company/members.html.twig
Match lines: 2
918|													<a href="{% if app.user.isManager or app.user.isSuperAdmin %}{{path('my_company_member_manage', {member: member.id})}}{% else %}javascript:void(0);{% endif %}"
939|														action="{{path('my_company_member_manage', {member: member.id})}}">

File: templates/company/members_v2.html.twig
Match lines: 1
519|                                        'url': path('my_company_member_manage', {'member': member.id}),

File: templates/company/teams_permissions.html.twig
Match lines: 1
509|															<a href="{{path('my_company_member_manage', {member: member.id})}}" class="btn mr-2 btn-default btn-sm" data-placement="top" data-rel="tooltip" type="submit" title="Editar" data-original-title="Editar">

File: templates/company/teams_permissions_v2.html.twig
Match lines: 1
519|										'url': path('my_company_member_manage', {member: member.id}),

File: templates/components/permissions_tab.html.twig
Match lines: 1
787|                                            <a href="{{path('my_company_member_manage', {member: member.id})}}" class="btn mr-1 btn-default btn-sm" title="Editar">

File: templates/governance/cases/partials/_gc_det_person_row.html.twig
Match lines: 2
19|            <a href="{{ path('my_company_member_manage', { member: person.id }) }}"
35|        <a href="{{ path('my_company_member_manage', { member: person.id }) }}"

File: templates/governance/cases/partials/_gc_det_section_associated_people.html.twig
Match lines: 1
11|         data-profile-url-template="{{ path('my_company_member_manage', { member: '__MEMBER__' })|e('html_attr') }}">

File: templates/hubs/visao_metahuman.html.twig
Match lines: 1
1566|                        url: '{{ path('my_company_member_manage', {member: 0}) }}'.replace('/0', '/' + member.id)

File: templates/layoutAdmin.html.twig
Match lines: 2
1245|                            <a href="{{path('my_company_members_list')}}" class="nav-link" data-rels="my_company_member_manage my_company_invited_members">
1581|                                <a id="nav_item_my_company_members_list_operations" href="{{ path('my_company_members_list') }}" class="nav-link" data-rels="my_company_member_manage my_company_invited_members my_company_teams_list my_company_team_manage">

File: templates/layoutUser.html.twig
Match lines: 1
305|        {% set sidebar_profile_url = sidebar_company_member ? path('my_company_member_manage', {'member': sidebar_company_member.id}) : path('user_profile') %}

File: templates/new-goals/pdi/pdi_permissions.html.twig
Match lines: 1
416|                                            <a href="{{path('my_company_member_manage', {member: member.id})}}"

File: templates/offboarding/old_files/permissions.twig
Match lines: 1
576|                                        <a href="{{path('my_company_member_manage', {member: member.id})}}" class="btn mr-2 btn-default btn-sm" data-placement="top" data-rel="tooltip" type="submit" title="Editar" data-original-title="Editar">

File: templates/onboarding/old_files/permissions.twig
Match lines: 1
862|                                                <a href="{{path('my_company_member_manage', {member: member.id})}}" class="btn mr-1 btn-default btn-sm" title="Editar">

File: templates/partials/app_search.html.twig
Match lines: 1
200|    const MEMBER_PAGE_URL = '{{ path('my_company_member_manage', {'member': '__MEMBER_ID__'}) }}';

File: templates/partials/app_search_user.html.twig
Match lines: 1
218|    const MEMBER_PAGE_URL = '{{ path('my_company_member_manage', {'member': '__MEMBER_ID__'}) }}';

File: templates/people_analytics/module_detail.html.twig
Match lines: 1
160|					onclick="window.location.href='{{ path('my_company_member_manage', {'member': selected_member_id}) }}#'">

File: templates/permissions_tags/member_tab_permissions.html.twig
Match lines: 1
827|                            'url': path('my_company_member_manage', {member: member.id}),

File: templates/structural_research/structural_research_permission.html.twig
Match lines: 1
438|                                            <a href="{{path('my_company_member_manage', {member: member.id})}}" class="btn mr-1 btn-default btn-sm" title="Editar">

File: tests/Service/MetaHuman/MetaHumanRoutesYamlContractTest.php
Match lines: 1
27|            'my_company_member_manage_v2',

file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 6980, "end_line": 7090}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15626)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 6980-7090
6980|                'message' => $emailTemplateBody,
6981|                'body' => $emailTemplateBody,
6982|                'title' => $title,
6983|                'subject' => $title,
6984|            ]);
6985|            $users = $this->resolveRecipients($recipientType, $member, $recipientContext);
6986|            
6987|            foreach ($users as $user) {
6988|                // 1️⃣ NOTIFICAÇÃO IN-APP (badge/popup)
6989|                try {
6990|                    $notification = new \App\Entity\NotificationSpecialist();
6991|                    $notification->setUser($user);
6992|                    $notification->setTitle($title);
6993|                    $notification->setMessage($message);
6994|                    $notification->setIsRead(false);
6995|                    $notification->setCreatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
6996|                    
6997|                    $this->entityManager->persist($notification);
6998|                    $createdNotifications[] = $user->getId();
6999|
7000|                    if ($this->notificationsCenterService instanceof NotificationsCenterService) {
7001|                        $notificationType = \App\Entity\NotificationsCenter::TYPE_REQUEST;
7002|                        if (str_contains((string) $templateSlug, 'bpm-notification') || $type === 'info') {
7003|                            $notificationType = \App\Entity\NotificationsCenter::TYPE_SYSTEM;
7004|                        }
7005|                        $this->notificationsCenterService->createNotification(
7006|                            recipient: $user,
7007|                            hub: 'Hub de Operações',
7008|                            product: 'Workflow BPM',
7009|                            content: trim($title . ': ' . $message),
7010|                            type: $notificationType,
7011|                            sender: null,
7012|                            buttonUrl: '/chat?adriana=1',
7013|                            flush: false
7014|                        );
7015|                    }
7016|                    
7017|                    $this->log('info', '✅ Notificação in-app criada', [
7018|                        'userId' => $user->getId(),
7019|                        'title' => $title
7020|                    ]);
7021|                } catch (\Exception $e) {
7022|                    $this->log('error', 'Erro ao criar notificação in-app', ['error' => $e->getMessage()]);
7023|                }
7024|                
7025|                // 2️⃣ EMAIL (se houver template ou corpo)
7026|                // NOTA: executeSendEmail() JÁ envia mensagem no chat automaticamente
7027|                // conforme documentação (Email + Chat em um único canal)
7028|                if ($templateSlug || !empty($emailTemplateBody)) {
7029|                    try {
7030|                        $emailConfig = [
7031|                            'to' => $user->getEmail(),
7032|                            'subject' => $title,
7033|                            'body' => $emailTemplateBody,
7034|                            'template' => $templateSlug,
7035|                            '_resolved_recipient_type' => $recipientType,
7036|                            // Keep request decision links when routing through executeSendEmail;
7037|                            // chat action buttons depend on these URLs.
7038|                            'approve_url' => $config['approve_url'] ?? null,
7039|                            'reject_url' => $config['reject_url'] ?? null,
7040|                            'approve_button_text' => $config['approve_button_text'] ?? null,
7041|                            'reject_button_text' => $config['reject_button_text'] ?? null,
7042|                            'request_type_label' => $config['request_type_label'] ?? null,
7043|                            'record_name' => $config['record_name'] ?? null,
7044|                            'system_sender' => $config['system_sender'] ?? null,
7045|                        ];
7046|                        if (filter_var($config['skip_auto_email_template'] ?? false, FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN)) {
7047|                            $emailConfig['skip_auto_email_template'] = true;
7048|                        }
7049|
7050|                        $emailResult = $this->executeSendEmail($emailConfig, $member, $recipientContext);
7051|                        
7052|                        if ($emailResult['sent'] ?? false) {
7053|                            $emailsSent[] = $user->getEmail();
7054|                            // Contabilizar mensagens de chat enviadas automaticamente pelo executeSendEmail
7055|                            if (isset($emailResult['chatMessagesSent']) && $emailResult['chatMessagesSent'] > 0) {
7056|                                $chatMessagesSent = array_merge($chatMessagesSent, $emailResult['chatUserIds'] ?? []);
7057|                            }
7058|                            $this->log('info', '✅ Email enviado via notificação (chat incluído automaticamente)', [
7059|                                'to' => $user->getEmail(),
7060|                                'subject' => $title
7061|                            ]);
7062|                        }
7063|                    } catch (\Exception $e) {
7064|                        $this->log('error', 'Erro ao enviar email via notificação', [
7065|                            'error' => $e->getMessage(),
7066|                            'to' => $user->getEmail()
7067|                        ]);
7068|                    }
7069|                }
7070|            }
7071|        }
7072|        
7073|        $this->entityManager->flush();
7074|        
7075|        return [
7076|            'notified' => count($createdNotifications),
7077|            'userIds' => $createdNotifications,
7078|            'emailsSent' => count($emailsSent),
7079|            'emails' => $emailsSent,
7080|            'chatMessagesSent' => count($chatMessagesSent),
7081|            'chatUserIds' => $chatMessagesSent
7082|        ];
7083|    }
7084|
7085|    /**
7086|     * Resolve financial-trail move destination by declarative stage key (YAML target_stage_key).
7087|     * Isolated from payroll: only used when sourceType is financial_trail_record.
7088|     */
7089|    private function resolveFinancialMoveStageByKey(
7090|        FlowInstanceMember $member,
Request #30 deepseek-v4-flash P:37.05K C:181 CR:33.02K CW:0 2152ms
Reasoning
Now let me read executeNotify (lines ~6930-6985).
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 6930, "end_line": 6985}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15626)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 6930-6985
6930|    private function executeNotify(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
6931|    {
6932|        $recipients = $config['recipients'] ?? [];
6933|        $recipientType = $config['to'] ?? $config['recipient'] ?? null;
6934|        $title = $config['title'] ?? $config['subject'] ?? null;
6935|        $message = $config['message'] ?? $config['body'] ?? null;
6936|        $messageHtml = $config['message_html'] ?? null;
6937|        $type = $config['type'] ?? 'info';
6938|        $templateSlug = $config['template'] ?? null;
6939|        
6940|        // Se recipients está vazio mas há 'to' ou 'recipient', usar como recipient único
6941|        if (empty($recipients) && $recipientType) {
6942|            $recipients = [$recipientType];
6943|        }
6944|        
6945|        // Fallback: se não há destinatários definidos, enviar para responsável do fluxo
6946|        if (empty($recipients)) {
6947|            error_log("[NOTIFY] ⚠️ Nenhum destinatário definido (to/recipient/recipients vazios) - usando fallback 'flow_responsible'");
6948|            $recipientType = 'flow_responsible';
6949|            $recipients = ['flow_responsible'];
6950|        }
6951|        
6952|        // 🎯 GERAR MENSAGEM AUTOMÁTICA se não foi fornecida
6953|        if (empty($title) || empty($message)) {
6954|            $autoMessage = $this->generateAutoNotificationMessage($member, $recipientType, $context);
6955|            $title = $title ?: $autoMessage['title'];
6956|            $message = $message ?: $autoMessage['message'];
6957|        }
6958|        
6959|        $title = $this->replaceVariables($title, $member, $context);
6960|        $message = $this->replaceVariables($message, $member, $context);
6961|        if ($messageHtml !== null && $messageHtml !== '') {
6962|            $messageHtml = $this->replaceVariables($messageHtml, $member, $context);
6963|        } else {
6964|            $messageHtml = null;
6965|        }
6966|
6967|        $emailTemplateBody = ($messageHtml !== null && $messageHtml !== '') ? $messageHtml : $message;
6968|        
6969|        $createdNotifications = [];
6970|        $emailsSent = [];
6971|        $chatMessagesSent = [];
6972|        
6973|        foreach ($recipients as $recipientType) {
6974|            // Merge context with action config so recipient resolvers can reuse action-specific keys.
6975|            // Example: manager_permission_products, role_id, company_member_id.
6976|            // title/subject must be the already-replaced strings: CompanySenderGenerator renders
6977|            // the DB template subject as Twig (e.g. "{{ title }} – {{ companyName }}"). If we keep
6978|            // config['title'] here, placeholders like {{member_name}} inside the automation title stay literal.
6979|            $recipientContext = array_merge($context, $config, [
6980|                'message' => $emailTemplateBody,
6981|                'body' => $emailTemplateBody,
6982|                'title' => $title,
6983|                'subject' => $title,
6984|            ]);
6985|            $users = $this->resolveRecipients($recipientType, $member, $recipientContext);
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 13880, "end_line": 13980}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15626)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 13880-13980
13880|        try {
13881|            // 1. Obter a empresa do membro/usuário
13882|            $company = null;
13883|            if ($member && $member->getFlowInstance()) {
13884|                $company = $member->getFlowInstance()->getCompany();
13885|            }
13886|            
13887|            if (!$company) {
13888|                // Tentar obter empresa do usuário via CompanyMembers
13889|                $companyMember = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\CompanyMembers::class)
13890|                    ->findOneBy(['user' => $user]);
13891|                if ($companyMember) {
13892|                    $company = $companyMember->getCompany();
13893|                }
13894|            }
13895|            
13896|            if (!$company) {
13897|                $this->log('warning', 'Não foi possível determinar empresa para envio de chat', [
13898|                    'userId' => $user->getId()
13899|                ]);
13900|                return ['sent' => false, 'error' => 'Empresa não encontrada'];
13901|            }
13902|            
13903|            // 2. Determinar canal:
13904|            // - CRM responsibles (record_owner/board_owner) must receive direct messages
13905|            // - employee/collaborator/candidate already use direct mode
13906|            // - request_notification actions (com approve_url/reject_url) também devem ser mensagens diretas,
13907|            //   independente do recipient_type (ex.: direct_manager, company_member no assessment)
13908|            $isRequestNotification = !empty($config['approve_url']) || !empty($config['reject_url']);
13909|            // Notificações sistêmicas são geradas pela assistente "Adriana",
13910|            // não por um gestor específico: a mensagem no chat deve sair sem remetente
13911|            // (userId = null), que o front renderiza como Adriana/Sistema.
13912|            $isSystemSender = filter_var($config['system_sender'] ?? false, FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN)
13913|                || ($member instanceof FlowInstanceMember
13914|                    && $member->getSourceType() === PayrollClosingBpmnService::SOURCE_TYPE);
13915|            // 'direct' is used by sendChatToSpecificEmails when the user was already resolved —
13916|            // always send a personal direct message in that case.
13917|            // training_group_responsible / responsible also get direct messages.
13918|            $isDirectMessage = $isRequestNotification
13919|                || in_array($recipientType, [
13920|                    'employee', 'collaborator', 'candidate',
13921|                    'record_owner', 'board_owner',
13922|                    'direct_manager', 'company_member', 'flow_responsible',
13923|                    'responsible', 'training_group_responsible',
13924|                    'direct',
13925|                ], true);
13926|
13927|            $fullMessage = "📢 **{$title}**\n\n{$message}";
13928|
13929|            // Sistema: o remetente é a própria Adriana, então a notificação deve cair na
13930|            // conversa exclusiva da Adriana (ai_assistant) do destinatário — e não numa conversa
13931|            // "individual" entre gestores. Isso também evita o caso em que, quando destinatário e
13932|            // gestor da empresa são o mesmo usuário, a busca por conversa individual acabava
13933|            // recaindo na conversa de outra pessoa.
13934|            if ($isSystemSender) {
13935|                $assistantConversation = $this->getOrCreateAssistantConversation($user);
13936|                if (!$assistantConversation) {
13937|                    return ['sent' => false, 'error' => 'Não foi possível obter a conversa da Adriana'];
13938|                }
13939|
13940|                $this->initializeChatUnreadBaseline($assistantConversation, $user);
13941|
13942|                $chatMessage = new \App\Entity\ChatMessage();
13943|                $chatMessage->setConversationId($assistantConversation->getId());
13944|                $chatMessage->setConversation($assistantConversation);
13945|                $chatMessage->setUserId(null); // Mensagem da Adriana em conversa ai_assistant
13946|                $chatMessage->setMessage($fullMessage);
13947|                $chatMessage->setTimestamp(new \DateTime());
13948|                $chatMessage->setIsInitialMessage(false);
13949|
13950|                $this->entityManager->persist($chatMessage);
13951|                $this->entityManager->flush();
13952|
13953|                return [
13954|                    'sent' => true,
13955|                    'conversationId' => $assistantConversation->getId(),
13956|                    'messageId' => $chatMessage->getId()
13957|                ];
13958|            }
13959|
13960|            if ($isDirectMessage) {
13961|                // ===== MENSAGEM DIRETA: Manager → Employee =====
13962|                error_log("💬 [sendChatNotification] Modo DIRETO para recipientType={$recipientType}");
13963|                
13964|                // Buscar ROLE_MANAGER da empresa
13965|                $adminUser = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\User::class)
13966|                    ->createQueryBuilder('u')
13967|                    ->where('u.company = :company')
13968|                    ->andWhere('u.roles LIKE :role')
13969|                    ->setParameter('company', $company)
13970|                    ->setParameter('role', '%ROLE_MANAGER%')
13971|                    ->setMaxResults(1)
13972|                    ->getQuery()
13973|                    ->getOneOrNullResult();
13974|                
13975|                if (!$adminUser) {
13976|                    return ['sent' => false, 'error' => 'Admin da empresa não encontrado'];
13977|                }
13978|                
13979|                // Buscar ou criar conversa individual entre manager e employee
13980|                $individualConversation = $this->getOrCreateIndividualConversation($adminUser, $user, $company);
Request #31 deepseek-v4-flash P:39.65K C:1.16K CR:37.12K CW:0 8618ms
Reasoning
OK. The system_sender logic in the chat send path looks fine. Note: `sendChatNotification` receives `$config` and in system_sender branch it sends only to the assistant conversation but doesn't include an HTML body/button... it sends `$fullMessage = "📢 {$title}\n\n{$message}"`. Wait, but the executeNotify path: For each recipient, does it call `sendChatNotification`? Let me check where sendChatNotification is invoked — executeNotify only creates in-app notifications and sends emails via executeSendEmail (which internally triggers chat). The changed lines 13903-13958 are inside `sendChatNotification` presumably, which is called from executeSendEmail. Also, `notificationsCenterService->createNotification(..., buttonUrl: '/chat?adriana=1', ...)` — in executeNotify at line 7012. Now the config in `executeNotify` passes `system_sender` from `$config` into emailConfig, which goes to `executeSendEmail`, and then to `sendChatNotification` presumably. Good. But important subtlety: The new automation action passes `message_html` with the button and `system_sender => true` to executeNotify. In executeNotify: - In-app notification created with content = title . ': ' . message (plain text) - buttonUrl = '/chat?adriana=1'. Good. - Then since templateSlug? There's no template passed in the config from executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft. Wait — executeNotify needs either a template or email body to send email. executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft passes title, message, message_html. So $templateSlug null, $emailTemplateBody = message_html. So email branch runs if templateSlug or emailTemplateBody non-empty. Since message_html non-empty, it will send email AND chat to the responsible via executeSendEmail with system_sender true. But wait — is an email desired here? The automation creates a chat message via Adriana + in-app notification + email. Actually, `executeSendEmail` sends an email to the user AND a chat message. With system_sender true, the chat message is sent by Adriana into the assistant conversation. And email is sent to the responsible's email. Hmm, the PR description says notification goes to chat with Adriana. The email is a side effect. Fine. But note that `message_html` contains raw HTML for email with the review button (reviewUrl). In chat, `$fullMessage` is markdown-ish text: `"📢 {$title}\n\n{$message}"` — not HTML. So the button link won't show in chat, but there is an in-app notification buttonUrl '/chat?adriana=1' and email button link. OK. Now — but wait, there's an important detail about the notification in-app content: at executeNotify line 7009 `content: trim($title . ': ' . $message)`. That's plain text message from automation. Fine. Now consider `resolveRecipients('company_member', ...)`: The recipient context has company_member_id = responsible id (set in config). Let me check how resolveRecipients handles 'company_member'. Let me look at resolveRecipients. Actually more importantly, the automation action YAML config_preset to = flow_responsible. But in the code, executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft sends executeNotify with to=company_member, company_member_id=responsible. So the recipient resolution: company_member with company_member_id => responsible company member. Need to check that resolveRecipients 'company_member' uses company_member_id config. Let me look. Also I want to double check the semantics: The notification is meant for the *responsible* to review S-2299 draft of the *dismissed employee*. The chat from Adriana to responsible in their assistant conversation with message text referencing member_name. member_name resolved from context/member: the FlowInstanceMember. The flow member in offboarding may be the dismissed employee. replaceVariables('{{member_name}}', $member, $context). Good if it resolves. Let me search resolveRecipients for 'company_member'. Let me also examine the important question of the event draft update semantics and required fields by reading repository saveEventS2299 to compare and find any missing required field (like `nrInscTransmissor`, tpInsc), and whether the entity has unique constraints. Let me read EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento entity and its repository. Let me do the reads/searches in parallel: 1. file_find EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository 2. resolveRecipients search 3. entity EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento file find.
Tool Calls (3)
code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "function resolveRecipients"}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 1
12928|    private function resolveRecipients(string $recipientType, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array

file_find
Show Details
{"query_name": "EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento"}
src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
file_find
Show Details
{"query_name": "flow_templates"}
templates/trm/admin/workflow_templates.html.twig
Request #32 deepseek-v4-flash P:40.94K C:149 CR:40.7K CW:0 1663ms
Reasoning
Let me read resolveRecipients (company_member branch) and the entity/repository. Also find FlowTemplate entity file.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 13060, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 12928}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15626)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 12928-13060
12928|    private function resolveRecipients(string $recipientType, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
12929|    {
12930|        $users = [];
12931|        
12932|        error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] recipientType: {$recipientType}, member: " . ($member ? $member->getId() : 'NULL'));
12933|        
12934|        switch ($recipientType) {
12935|            case 'candidate':
12936|            case 'member':
12937|            case 'employee':
12938|            case 'collaborator':
12939|                // Candidato / Colaborador (processo seletivo, onboarding, offboarding)
12940|                if ($member) {
12941|                    if ($member->getUser()) {
12942|                        $users[] = $member->getUser();
12943|                    }
12944|                    error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found candidate/member/employee: " . ($member->getUser()?->getEmail() ?? $member->getCompanyMember()?->getEmail() ?? 'sem-email'));
12945|                }
12946|                break;
12947|
12948|            case 'record_owner':
12949|                if ($member) {
12950|                    $emails = $this->getCrmRecordOwnerEmails($member);
12951|                    $emails = is_array($emails) ? $emails : (empty($emails) ? [] : [$emails]);
12952|                    foreach ($emails as $email) {
12953|                        $email = trim((string) $email);
12954|                        if ($email === '') {
12955|                            continue;
12956|                        }
12957|                        $user = $this->entityManager->getRepository(User::class)->findOneBy(['email' => $email]);
12958|                        if ($user) {
12959|                            $users[] = $user;
12960|                        }
12961|                    }
12962|                }
12963|                break;
12964|
12965|            case 'board_owner':
12966|                if ($member) {
12967|                    $emails = $this->getCrmBoardOwnerEmails($member);
12968|                    $emails = is_array($emails) ? $emails : (empty($emails) ? [] : [$emails]);
12969|                    foreach ($emails as $email) {
12970|                        $email = trim((string) $email);
12971|                        if ($email === '') {
12972|                            continue;
12973|                        }
12974|                        $user = $this->entityManager->getRepository(User::class)->findOneBy(['email' => $email]);
12975|                        if ($user) {
12976|                            $users[] = $user;
12977|                        }
12978|                    }
12979|                }
12980|                break;
12981|            
12982|            case 'responsible':
12983|                // Buscar responsável por produto
12984|                if ($member) {
12985|                    $sourceType = $member->getSourceType();
12986|                    $sourceId = $member->getSourceId();
12987|                    
12988|                    if ($sourceType === 'process' && $sourceId) {
12989|                        // Processo seletivo: Process.responsible
12990|                        $process = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\Process::class)
12991|                            ->find($sourceId);
12992|                        
12993|                        if ($process) {
12994|                            $responsible = $process->getResponsible();
12995|                            if ($responsible) {
12996|                                $users[] = $responsible;
12997|                                error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found responsible from Process: " . $responsible->getEmail());
12998|                            } else {
12999|                                error_log("⚠️ [resolveRecipients] Process {$process->getId()} não tem responsável definido!");
13000|                            }
13001|                        }
13002|                    } elseif (in_array($sourceType, ['training_participant', 'training_group'], true)) {
13003|                        // Treinamentos: responsáveis do grupo de treinamento (Process.responsible + responsibles)
13004|                        $meta = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? [];
13005|                        $trainingProcessId = (int) ($meta['processId'] ?? $sourceId ?? 0);
13006|                        if ($trainingProcessId > 0) {
13007|                            $trainingProcess = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\Process::class)->find($trainingProcessId);
13008|                            if ($trainingProcess) {
13009|                                $seen = [];
13010|                                $primary = $trainingProcess->getResponsible();
13011|                                if ($primary) {
13012|                                    $seen[$primary->getId()] = true;
13013|                                    $users[] = $primary;
13014|                                    error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found training responsible (primary): " . $primary->getEmail());
13015|                                }
13016|                                foreach ($trainingProcess->getResponsibles() as $resp) {
13017|                                    if (!isset($seen[$resp->getId()])) {
13018|                                        $seen[$resp->getId()] = true;
13019|                                        $users[] = $resp;
13020|                                        error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found training responsible (extra): " . $resp->getEmail());
13021|                                    }
13022|                                }
13023|                                if (empty($users)) {
13024|                                    error_log("⚠️ [resolveRecipients] responsible/training: nenhum responsável no Process #{$trainingProcessId}");
13025|                                }
13026|                            }
13027|                        }
13028|                    } elseif ($sourceType === 'offboarding' && $sourceId) {
13029|                        // Offboarding: buscar ROLE_MANAGER da empresa
13030|                        $responsibleEmail = $this->getResponsibleEmail($member);
13031|                        if ($responsibleEmail) {
13032|                            $emails = is_array($responsibleEmail) ? $responsibleEmail : [$responsibleEmail];
13033|                            foreach ($emails as $email) {
13034|                                $user = $this->entityManager->getRepository(User::class)->findOneBy(['email' => $email]);
13035|                                if ($user) {
13036|                                    $users[] = $user;
13037|                                    error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found responsible for offboarding: " . $user->getEmail());
13038|                                }
13039|                            }
13040|                        }
13041|                    } elseif ($sourceType === 'onboarding' && $sourceId) {
13042|                        // Onboarding: buscar ROLE_MANAGER da empresa
13043|                        $responsibleEmail = $this->getResponsibleEmail($member);
13044|                        if ($responsibleEmail) {
13045|                            $emails = is_array($responsibleEmail) ? $responsibleEmail : [$responsibleEmail];
13046|                            foreach ($emails as $email) {
13047|                                $user = $this->entityManager->getRepository(User::class)->findOneBy(['email' => $email]);
13048|                                if ($user) {
13049|                                    $users[] = $user;
13050|                                    error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found responsible for onboarding: " . $user->getEmail());
13051|                                }
13052|                            }
13053|                        }
13054|                    } else {
13055|                        error_log("⚠️ [resolveRecipients] Member não está vinculado a um produto conhecido (sourceType: " . ($member->getSourceType() ?? 'NULL') . ")");
13056|                    }
13057|                }
13058|                break;
13059|
13060|            case 'flow_responsible':
file_find
Show Details
{"query_name": "FlowTemplate"}
java/src/main/java/com/metahuman/dto/workflow/WorkflowTemplateDTO.java
migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
src/Command/SeedFinancialFlowTemplatesCommand.php
src/Command/SeedPayrollFlowTemplatesCommand.php
src/Controller/DecisionSystem/FlowTemplateController.php
src/Controller/OperationOrchestrator/FlowTemplateController.php
src/Domains/FileManagement/v2/Service/Indexing/Classification/Rules/TrmWorkflowTemplateDocumentTypeRule.php
src/Entity/FlowTemplate.php
src/Entity/FlowTemplateProduct.php
src/Repository/FlowTemplateProductRepository.php
src/Repository/FlowTemplateRepository.php
src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowApprovedFlowTemplateMaterializer.php
src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowApprovedFlowTemplateMaterializerInterface.php
src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowApprovedPayrollFlowTemplateEnricher.php
src/Service/Products/FinancialFlowTemplatePresets.php
src/Service/Products/PayrollFlowTemplatePresets.php
tests/Service/Products/FinancialFlowTemplatePresetsTest.php
tests/Unit/Product/FolhaDePagamento/PayrollFlowTemplatePresetsTest.php
tests/Unit/Product/TextToBpmn/WorkflowApprovedFlowTemplateMaterializerAutomationsTest.php
tests/Unit/Product/TextToBpmn/WorkflowApprovedFlowTemplateMaterializerCrmStepsTest.php
tests/Unit/Product/TextToBpmn/WorkflowApprovedFlowTemplateMaterializerRetrievalHookTest.php
tests/Unit/Product/TextToBpmn/WorkflowApprovedFlowTemplateMaterializerTest.php
tests/Unit/Product/TextToBpmn/WorkflowApprovedPayrollFlowTemplateEnricherTest.php
Request #33 deepseek-v4-flash P:43.32K C:113 CR:40.96K CW:0 1465ms
Reasoning
Let me read the rest of resolveRecipients for 'company_member' and 'flow_responsible'.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 13160, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 13060}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15626)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 13060-13160
13060|            case 'flow_responsible':
13061|                // Buscar responsável do fluxo por produto
13062|                if ($member) {
13063|                    $flowRespEmail = $this->getFlowResponsibleEmail($member);
13064|                    if ($flowRespEmail) {
13065|                        $emails = is_array($flowRespEmail) ? $flowRespEmail : [$flowRespEmail];
13066|                        foreach ($emails as $email) {
13067|                            $user = $this->entityManager->getRepository(User::class)->findOneBy(['email' => $email]);
13068|                            if ($user) {
13069|                                $users[] = $user;
13070|                                error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found flow_responsible: " . $user->getEmail());
13071|                            }
13072|                        }
13073|                    }
13074|                }
13075|                break;
13076|            
13077|            case 'interviewer':
13078|                // Buscar entrevistador do processo seletivo
13079|                if ($member && $member->getSourceType() === 'process' && $member->getSourceId()) {
13080|                    $process = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\Process::class)
13081|                        ->find($member->getSourceId());
13082|                    
13083|                    if ($process && $process->getInterviewer()) {
13084|                        $users[] = $process->getInterviewer();
13085|                        error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found interviewer: " . $process->getInterviewer()->getEmail());
13086|                    }
13087|                }
13088|                break;
13089|            
13090|            case 'monitored_evaluator':
13091|                // Buscar avaliador monitorado
13092|                // TODO: Implementar lógica específica se necessário
13093|                error_log("⚠️ [resolveRecipients] monitored_evaluator ainda não implementado");
13094|                break;
13095|            
13096|            case 'company_member':
13097|                // Buscar membro específico da empresa pelo ID na config.
13098|                // Fallback: quando não houver ID explícito, usar o próprio membro do fluxo.
13099|                if (isset($context['company_member_id'])) {
13100|                    $companyMemberId = $context['company_member_id'];
13101|                    $companyMember = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\CompanyMembers::class)
13102|                        ->find($companyMemberId);
13103|                    
13104|                    if ($companyMember && $companyMember->getUser()) {
13105|                        $users[] = $companyMember->getUser();
13106|                        error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found company_member: " . $companyMember->getUser()->getEmail());
13107|                    }
13108|                } elseif ($member) {
13109|                    if ($member->getUser()) {
13110|                        $users[] = $member->getUser();
13111|                        error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Fallback company_member via FlowInstanceMember->getUser(): " . $member->getUser()->getEmail());
13112|                    } elseif ($member->getCompanyMember() && $member->getCompanyMember()->getUser()) {
13113|                        $users[] = $member->getCompanyMember()->getUser();
13114|                        error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Fallback company_member via FlowInstanceMember->getCompanyMember(): " . $member->getCompanyMember()->getUser()->getEmail());
13115|                    }
13116|                }
13117|                break;
13118|                
13119|            case 'manager':
13120|                // Apenas gestores por permissão canEdit/teamLimitation dos produtos alvo (sem fallback para administradores/ROLE_MANAGER)
13121|                if ($member) {
13122|                    $permissionProducts = $this->resolveManagerPermissionProductSlugs($member, $context);
13123|                    $users = $this->resolveManagersByProductPermissions($member, $permissionProducts);
13124|                    if (empty($users)) {
13125|                        error_log("⚠️ [resolveRecipients] Manager não encontrado para member {$member->getId()} (nenhum usuário com permissão canEdit nos produtos)");
13126|                    }
13127|                }
13128|                break;
13129|
13130|            case 'direct_manager':
13131|                // Gestor direto do membro (superior no organograma)
13132|                if ($member) {
13133|                    $managerEmails = $this->getManagerEmail($member);
13134|                    $emails = is_array($managerEmails)
13135|                        ? array_filter($managerEmails)
13136|                        : (empty($managerEmails) ? [] : [$managerEmails]);
13137|
13138|                    foreach ($emails as $email) {
13139|                        $email = trim((string) $email);
13140|                        if ($email === '') {
13141|                            continue;
13142|                        }
13143|                        $managerUser = $this->entityManager->getRepository(User::class)->findOneBy(['email' => $email]);
13144|                        if ($managerUser) {
13145|                            $users[] = $managerUser;
13146|                        }
13147|                    }
13148|
13149|                    if (empty($users)) {
13150|                        error_log("⚠️ [resolveRecipients] Gestor direto não encontrado para member {$member->getId()}");
13151|                    }
13152|                }
13153|                break;
13154|            
13155|            case 'goal_responsible':
13156|                // Responsável da meta PDI (do GoalPdi)
13157|                if ($member) {
13158|                    $goalRespEmail = $this->getGoalResponsibleEmail($member);
13159|                    if ($goalRespEmail) {
13160|                        $emails = is_array($goalRespEmail) ? $goalRespEmail : [$goalRespEmail];
Request #34 deepseek-v4-flash P:44.87K C:165 CR:43.39K CW:0 2133ms
Reasoning
OK, so 'company_member' recipient with context company_member_id works. Now let me read the entity EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento and its repository saveEventS2299 to compare required fields and setters, plus check unique constraints. Let me read both files.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php"}
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php (Total lines: 335)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-335
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Entity;
4|
5|use App\Repository\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository;
6|use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
7|
8|/**
9| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass=EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::class)
10| */
11|class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento extends EsocialEvents
12|{
13|    /**
14|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="EsocialDadosTrabalhador")
15|     * @ORM\JoinColumn(name="esocial_dados_trabalhador_id", referencedColumnName="id", nullable=false)
16|     */
17|    private $esocialTrabalhador;
18|
19|    /**
20|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=2, nullable=true)
21|     */
22|    private $mtvDeslig;
23|
24|    /**
25|     * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
26|     */
27|    private $dtDeslig;
28|
29|    /**
30|     * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
31|     */
32|    private $dtAvPrv;
33|
34|    /**
35|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=1, nullable=true)
36|     */
37|    private $indPagtoApi;
38|
39|    /**
40|     * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
41|     */
42|    private $dtProjFimApi;
43|
44|    /**
45|     * @ORM\Column(type="integer", nullable=true)
46|     */
47|    private $pensAlim;
48|
49|    /**
50|     * @ORM\Column(type="decimal", precision=10, scale=2, nullable=true)
51|     */
52|    private $percAliment;
53|
54|    /**
55|     * @ORM\Column(type="decimal", precision=10, scale=2, nullable=true)
56|     */
57|    private $vrAlim;
58|
59|    /**
60|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=20, nullable=true)
61|     */
62|    private $nrProcTrab;
63|
64|    /**
65|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=1, nullable=true)
66|     */
67|    private $indPdv;
68|
69|    /**
70|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=11, nullable=true)
71|     */
72|    private $cpfSubstituto;
73|
74|    /**
75|     * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
76|     */
77|    private $dtNascto;
78|
79|    /**
80|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=11, nullable=true)
81|     */
82|    private $novoCpf;
83|
84|    /**
85|     * @ORM\Column(type="integer", nullable=true)
86|     */
87|    private $indRemun;
88|
89|    /**
90|     * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
91|     */
92|    private $dtFimRemun;
93|
94|    /**
95|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=5, nullable=true)
96|     */
97|    private $insConsig;
98|
99|    /**
100|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=40, nullable=true)
101|     */
102|    private $nrContr;
103|
104|    /**
105|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity=EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class, )
106|     * @ORM\JoinColumn(nullable=false)
107|     */
108|    private $dadosRemuneracao;
109|
110|    public function getDadosRemuneracao(): ?EsocialDadosRemuneracao
111|    {
112|        return $this->dadosRemuneracao;
113|    }
114|
115|    public function setDadosRemuneracao(?EsocialDadosRemuneracao $dadosRemuneracao): self
116|    {
117|        $this->dadosRemuneracao = $dadosRemuneracao;
118|
119|        return $this;
120|    }
121|
122|    public function getEsocialTrabalhador()
123|    {
124|        return $this->esocialTrabalhador;
125|    }
126|
127|    public function setEsocialTrabalhador(?EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador): void
128|    {
129|        $this->esocialTrabalhador = $esocialTrabalhador;
130|    }
131|
132|    public function getMtvDeslig(): ?string
133|    {
134|        return $this->mtvDeslig;
135|    }
136|
137|    public function setMtvDeslig(?string $mtvDeslig): self
138|    {
139|        $this->mtvDeslig = $mtvDeslig;
140|
141|        return $this;
142|    }
143|
144|    public function getDtDeslig(): ?\DateTimeInterface
145|    {
146|        return $this->dtDeslig;
147|    }
148|
149|    public function setDtDeslig(?\DateTimeInterface $dtDeslig): self
150|    {
151|        $this->dtDeslig = $dtDeslig;
152|
153|        return $this;
154|    }
155|
156|    public function getDtAvPrv(): ?\DateTimeInterface
157|    {
158|        return $this->dtAvPrv;
159|    }
160|
161|    public function setDtAvPrv(?\DateTimeInterface $dtAvPrv): self
162|    {
163|        $this->dtAvPrv = $dtAvPrv;
164|
165|        return $this;
166|    }
167|
168|    public function getIndPagtoApi(): ?string
169|    {
170|        return $this->indPagtoApi;
171|    }
172|
173|    public function setIndPagtoApi(?string $indPagtoApi): self
174|    {
175|        $this->indPagtoApi = $indPagtoApi;
176|
177|        return $this;
178|    }
179|
180|    public function getDtProjFimApi(): ?\DateTimeInterface
181|    {
182|        return $this->dtProjFimApi;
183|    }
184|
185|    public function setDtProjFimApi(?\DateTimeInterface $dtProjFimApi): self
186|    {
187|        $this->dtProjFimApi = $dtProjFimApi;
188|
189|        return $this;
190|    }
191|
192|    public function getPensAlim(): ?int
193|    {
194|        return $this->pensAlim;
195|    }
196|
197|    public function setPensAlim(?int $pensAlim): self
198|    {
199|        $this->pensAlim = $pensAlim;
200|
201|        return $this;
202|    }
203|
204|    public function getPercAliment(): ?string
205|    {
206|        return $this->percAliment;
207|    }
208|
209|    public function setPercAliment(?string $percAliment): self
210|    {
211|        $this->percAliment = $percAliment;
212|
213|        return $this;
214|    }
215|
216|    public function getVrAlim(): ?string
217|    {
218|        return $this->vrAlim;
219|    }
220|
221|    public function setVrAlim(?string $vrAlim): self
222|    {
223|        $this->vrAlim = $vrAlim;
224|
225|        return $this;
226|    }
227|
228|    public function getNrProcTrab(): ?string
229|    {
230|        return $this->nrProcTrab;
231|    }
232|
233|    public function setNrProcTrab(?string $nrProcTrab): self
234|    {
235|        $this->nrProcTrab = $nrProcTrab;
236|
237|        return $this;
238|    }
239|
240|    public function getIndPdv(): ?string
241|    {
242|        return $this->indPdv;
243|    }
244|
245|    public function setIndPdv(?string $indPdv): self
246|    {
247|        $this->indPdv = $indPdv;
248|
249|        return $this;
250|    }
251|
252|    public function getCpfSubstituto(): ?string
253|    {
254|        return $this->cpfSubstituto;
255|    }
256|
257|    public function setCpfSubstituto(?string $cpfSubstituto): self
258|    {
259|        $this->cpfSubstituto = $cpfSubstituto;
260|
261|        return $this;
262|    }
263|
264|    public function getDtNascto(): ?\DateTimeInterface
265|    {
266|        return $this->dtNascto;
267|    }
268|
269|    public function setDtNascto(?\DateTimeInterface $dtNascto): self
270|    {
271|        $this->dtNascto = $dtNascto;
272|
273|        return $this;
274|    }
275|
276|    public function getNovoCpf(): ?string
277|    {
278|        return $this->novoCpf;
279|    }
280|
281|    public function setNovoCpf(?string $novoCpf): self
282|    {
283|        $this->novoCpf = $novoCpf;
284|
285|        return $this;
286|    }
287|
288|    public function getIndRemun(): ?int
289|    {
290|        return $this->indRemun;
291|    }
292|
293|    public function setIndRemun(?int $indRemun): self
294|    {
295|        $this->indRemun = $indRemun;
296|
297|        return $this;
298|    }
299|
300|    public function getDtFimRemun(): ?\DateTimeInterface
301|    {
302|        return $this->dtFimRemun;
303|    }
304|
305|    public function setDtFimRemun(?\DateTimeInterface $dtFimRemun): self
306|    {
307|        $this->dtFimRemun = $dtFimRemun;
308|
309|        return $this;
310|    }
311|
312|    public function getInsConsig(): ?string
313|    {
314|        return $this->insConsig;
315|    }
316|
317|    public function setInsConsig(?string $insConsig): self
318|    {
319|        $this->insConsig = $insConsig;
320|
321|        return $this;
322|    }
323|
324|    public function getNrContr(): ?string
325|    {
326|        return $this->nrContr;
327|    }
328|
329|    public function setNrContr(?string $nrContr): self
330|    {
331|        $this->nrContr = $nrContr;
332|
333|        return $this;
334|    }
335|}
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php"}
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php (Total lines: 296)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-296
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Repository;
4|
5|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
6|use Doctrine\Bundle\DoctrineBundle\Repository\ServiceEntityRepository;
7|use Doctrine\ORM\OptimisticLockException;
8|use Doctrine\ORM\ORMException;
9|use Doctrine\Persistence\ManagerRegistry;
10|
11|/**
12| * @extends ServiceEntityRepository<EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento>
13| *
14| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento|null find($id, $lockMode = null, $lockVersion = null)
15| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento|null findOneBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null)
16| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[]    findAll()
17| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[]    findBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null, $limit = null, $offset = null)
18| */
19|class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository extends ServiceEntityRepository
20|{
21|    public function __construct(ManagerRegistry $registry)
22|    {
23|        parent::__construct($registry, EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class);
24|    }
25|
26|    /**
27|     * @throws ORMException
28|     * @throws OptimisticLockException
29|     */
30|    public function add(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $entity, bool $flush = true): void
31|    {
32|        $this->_em->persist($entity);
33|        if ($flush) {
34|            $this->_em->flush();
35|        }
36|    }
37|
38|    /**
39|     * @throws ORMException
40|     * @throws OptimisticLockException
41|     */
42|    public function remove(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $entity, bool $flush = true): void
43|    {
44|        $this->_em->remove($entity);
45|        if ($flush) {
46|            $this->_em->flush();
47|        }
48|    }
49|
50|    function sanitizeCNPJ($cnpj) {
51|        return preg_replace('/\D/', '', $cnpj);
52|    }
53|
54|    function sanitizeCPF($cpf) {
55|        return preg_replace('/\D/', '', $cpf);
56|    }
57|
58|    private function buildDateOrNull(?string $date): ?\DateTime
59|    {
60|        return !empty($date) ? new \DateTime($date) : null;
61|    }
62|
63|    public function saveEventS2299($esocialDadosTrabalhador, $data, $company, $dadosRemuneracao): EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
64|    {
65|        $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
66|        $event->setModo( 'INC');
67|        $event->setCompany($company);
68|        $event->setTpAmb($company->getEsocialMode() ?? '2');
69|        $event->setTpInscTransmissor(1);
70|        $event->setNrInscTransmissor($this->sanitizeCNPJ($company->getCnpj()));
71|        $event->setEsocialTrabalhador($esocialDadosTrabalhador);
72|        $event->setIndRetif(1);
73|        $event->setStatus('pendente');
74|        $event->setCreatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
75|        $event->setMtvDeslig($data['motivoDesligamento'] ?? null);
76|        $event->setDtDeslig($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataDesligamento']) ?? null);
77|        $event->setDtAvPrv($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataConcessaoAviso']) ?? null);
78|        $event->setIndPagtoApi($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N');
79|        $event->setDtProjFimApi($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataTerminoAviso']) ?? null);
80|        $event->setPensAlim($data['pensAlim'] ?? null);
81|        $event->setPercAliment($data['percAliment'] ?? null);
82|        $event->setVrAlim($data['vrAlim'] ?? null);
83|        $event->setNrProcTrab($data['numeroProcesso'] ?? null);
84|        $event->setIndPdv($data['indPdv'] ?? null);
85|        $event->setCpfSubstituto($this->sanitizeCPF($data['cpfSubstituto']) ?? null);
86|        $event->setDtNascto($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataNascimentoTitular']) ?? null);
87|        $event->setNovoCpf($this->sanitizeCPF($data['novoCpfTrabalhador']) ?? null);
88|        $event->setIndRemun($data['indRemun'] ?? null);
89|        $event->setDtFimRemun($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dtFimRemun']) ?? null);
90|        $event->setInsConsig($data['matriculaInstituicao'] ?? null);
91|        $event->setNrContr($data['numeroContrato'] ?? null);
92|        $event->setDadosRemuneracao($dadosRemuneracao);
93|
94|        $this->add($event);
95|
96|        return $event;
97|    }
98|
99|    /**
100|     * Extrai todos os dados do evento S-2299 para formatação no FlowableVariablesService
101|     * 
102|     * @param int $eventId ID do evento (EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento)
103|     * @return array|null Dados estruturados do evento e relacionamentos, ou null se não encontrado
104|     */
105|    public function getFlowableDataForTemplate(int $eventId): ?array
106|    {
107|        $event = $this->find($eventId);
108|        
109|        if (!$event) {
110|            return null;
111|        }
112|        
113|        // Extrair dados principais do evento
114|        $data = [
115|            'id' => $event->getId(),
116|            'mtvDeslig' => $event->getMtvDeslig(),
117|            'dtDeslig' => $event->getDtDeslig()?->format('Y-m-d'),
118|            'dtAvPrv' => $event->getDtAvPrv()?->format('Y-m-d'),
119|            'indPagtoApi' => $event->getIndPagtoApi(),
120|            'dtProjFimApi' => $event->getDtProjFimApi()?->format('Y-m-d'),
121|            'pensAlim' => $event->getPensAlim(),
122|            'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),
123|            'vrAlim' => $event->getVrAlim(),
124|            'nrProcTrab' => $event->getNrProcTrab(),
125|            'indPdv' => $event->getIndPdv(),
126|            'cpfSubstituto' => $event->getCpfSubstituto(),
127|            'dtNascto' => $event->getDtNascto()?->format('Y-m-d'),
128|            'novoCpf' => $event->getNovoCpf(),
129|            'indRemun' => $event->getIndRemun(),
130|            'dtFimRemun' => $event->getDtFimRemun()?->format('Y-m-d'),
131|            'insConsig' => $event->getInsConsig(),
132|            'nrContr' => $event->getNrContr(),
133|        ];
134|        
135|        // Extrair dados da classe pai (EsocialEvents)
136|        $data['modo'] = $event->getModo();
137|        $data['tpAmb'] = $event->getTpAmb();
138|        $data['uniqueEventId'] = $event->getUniqueEventId();
139|        $data['tpInscTransmissor'] = $event->getTpInscTransmissor();
140|        $data['nrInscTransmissor'] = $event->getNrInscTransmissor();
141|        $data['iniValid'] = $event->getIniValid();
142|        $data['fimValid'] = $event->getFimValid();
143|        $data['indRetif'] = $event->getIndRetif();
144|        $data['indApuracao'] = $event->getIndApuracao();
145|        $data['perApur'] = $event->getPerApur()?->format('Y-m-d');
146|        $data['indGuia'] = $event->getIndGuia();
147|        $data['status'] = $event->getStatus();
148|        $data['createdAt'] = $event->getCreatedAt()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s');
149|        $data['updatedAt'] = $event->getUpdatedAt()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s');
150|        
151|        // Extrair dados da empresa
152|        $company = $event->getCompany();
153|        if ($company) {
154|            $data['company'] = [
155|                'id' => $company->getId(),
156|                'name' => $company->getName(),
157|                'code' => $company->getCode(),
158|                'cnpj' => $company->getCnpj(),
159|            ];
160|        } else {
161|            $data['company'] = null;
162|        }
163|        
164|        // Extrair dados do trabalhador eSocial relacionado
165|        $esocialTrabalhador = $event->getEsocialTrabalhador();
166|        if ($esocialTrabalhador) {
167|            $dadosTrabalhador = $esocialTrabalhador->getDadosTrabalhador();
168|            $endereco = $esocialTrabalhador->getEndereco();
169|            
170|            $data['esocialTrabalhador'] = [
171|                'id' => $esocialTrabalhador->getId(),
172|                'isTrabalhadorSemVinculo' => $esocialTrabalhador->getIsTrabalhadorSemVinculo(),
173|                'dadosTrabalhador' => $dadosTrabalhador ? [
174|                    'cpfTrab' => $dadosTrabalhador->getCpfTrab(),
175|                    'nmTrab' => $dadosTrabalhador->getNmTrab(),
176|                    'sexo' => $dadosTrabalhador->getSexo(),
177|                    'racaCor' => $dadosTrabalhador->getRacaCor(),
178|                    'estCiv' => $dadosTrabalhador->getEstCiv(),
179|                    'grauInstr' => $dadosTrabalhador->getGrauInstr(),
180|                    'nmSoc' => $dadosTrabalhador->getNmSoc(),
181|                    'dtNascto' => $dadosTrabalhador->getDtNascto()?->format('Y-m-d'),
182|                    'paisNascto' => $dadosTrabalhador->getPaisNascto(),
183|                    'paisNac' => $dadosTrabalhador->getPaisNac(),
184|                    'fonePrinc' => $dadosTrabalhador->getFonePrinc(),
185|                    'emailPrinc' => $dadosTrabalhador->getEmailPrinc(),
186|                    'dtAltDadosPessoais' => $dadosTrabalhador->getDtAltDadosPessoais()?->format('Y-m-d'),
187|                ] : null,
188|                'endereco' => $endereco ? [
189|                    'brasil' => $endereco->getBrasil() ? [
190|                        'tpLograd' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getTpLograd(),
191|                        'dscLograd' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getDscLograd(),
192|                        'nrLograd' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getNrLograd(),
193|                        'complemento' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getComplemento(),
194|                        'bairro' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getBairro(),
195|                        'cep' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getCep(),
196|                        'codMunic' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getCodMunic(),
197|                        'uf' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getUf(),
198|                    ] : null,
199|                    'exterior' => $endereco->getExterior() ? [
200|                        'paisResid' => $endereco->getExterior()->getPaisResid(),
201|                        'dscLograd' => $endereco->getExterior()->getDscLograd(),
202|                        'nrLograd' => $endereco->getExterior()->getNrLograd(),
203|                        'complemento' => $endereco->getExterior()->getComplemento(),
204|                        'bairro' => $endereco->getExterior()->getBairro(),
205|                        'nmCid' => $endereco->getExterior()->getNmCid(),
206|                        'codPostal' => $endereco->getExterior()->getCodPostal(),
207|                    ] : null,
208|                ] : null,
209|            ];
210|        } else {
211|            $data['esocialTrabalhador'] = null;
212|        }
213|        
214|        // Extrair dados de remuneração (EsocialDadosRemuneracao)
215|        $dadosRemuneracao = $event->getDadosRemuneracao();
216|        if ($dadosRemuneracao) {
217|            $data['dadosRemuneracao'] = [
218|                'id' => $dadosRemuneracao->getId(),
219|                'indMv' => $dadosRemuneracao->getIndMv(),
220|                'tpInscRemunOutrEmpr' => $dadosRemuneracao->getTpInscRemunOutrEmpr(),
221|                'nmTrab' => $dadosRemuneracao->getNmTrab(),
222|                'dtNascto' => $dadosRemuneracao->getDtNascto()?->format('Y-m-d'),
223|                'tpInscSucessaoVinc' => $dadosRemuneracao->getTpInscSucessaoVinc(),
224|                'nrInscSucessaoVinc' => $dadosRemuneracao->getNrInscSucessaoVinc(),
225|                'matricAnt' => $dadosRemuneracao->getMatricAnt(),
226|                'dtAdm' => $dadosRemuneracao->getDtAdm()?->format('Y-m-d'),
227|                'procJudTrab' => $dadosRemuneracao->getProcJudTrab(),
228|                'infoTerm' => $dadosRemuneracao->getInfoTerm(),
229|            ];
230|        } else {
231|            $data['dadosRemuneracao'] = null;
232|        }
233|        
234|        // Extrair dados do batch se existir
235|        $batch = $event->getBatch();
236|        if ($batch) {
237|            $data['batch'] = [
238|                'id' => $batch->getId(),
239|                'cdResposta' => $batch->getCdResposta(),
240|                'descResposta' => $batch->getDescResposta(),
241|                'protocoloEnvio' => $batch->getProtocoloEnvio(),
242|                'dhRecepcao' => $batch->getDhRecepcao()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s'),
243|            ];
244|        } else {
245|            $data['batch'] = null;
246|        }
247|        
248|        // Extrair dados da resposta se existir
249|        $response = $event->getResponse();
250|        if ($response) {
251|            $data['response'] = [
252|                'id' => $response->getId(),
253|                'tpAmb' => $response->getTpAmb(),
254|                'cdResposta' => $response->getCdResposta(),
255|                'descResposta' => $response->getDescResposta(),
256|                'nrRecibo' => $response->getNrRecibo(),
257|                'dhProcessamento' => $response->getDhProcessamento()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s'),
258|                'ocorrencias' => $response->getOcorrencias(),
259|            ];
260|        } else {
261|            $data['response'] = null;
262|        }
263|        
264|        return $data;
265|    }
266|
267|    // /**
268|    //  * @return EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[] Returns an array of EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento objects
269|    //  */
270|    /*
271|    public function findByExampleField($value)
272|    {
273|        return $this->createQueryBuilder('e')
274|            ->andWhere('e.exampleField = :val')
275|            ->setParameter('val', $value)
276|            ->orderBy('e.id', 'ASC')
277|            ->setMaxResults(10)
278|            ->getQuery()
279|            ->getResult()
280|        ;
281|    }
282|    */
283|
284|    /*
285|    public function findOneBySomeField($value): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
286|    {
287|        return $this->createQueryBuilder('e')
288|            ->andWhere('e.exampleField = :val')
289|            ->setParameter('val', $value)
290|            ->getQuery()
291|            ->getOneOrNullResult()
292|        ;
293|    }
294|    */
295|}
296|
Request #35 deepseek-v4-flash P:52.11K C:459 CR:44.93K CW:0 4388ms
Reasoning
Interesting - compare `saveEventS2299` field mapping vs `buildEsocialS2299DraftPayload`: In saveEventS2299: - `setPensAlim($data['pensAlim'] ?? null)` - entity column is integer. OK. In applyEsocialS2299Payload: `$event->getPensAlim()`, `setPensAlim(intOrNull(...))`. Wait, entity setPensAlim expects ?int. But there's a commit note: "bugfix(esocial): Alterar os tipos de dados dos campos de pensão para "string""... Actually the entity shows pensAlim as integer and percAliment/vrAlim as decimal (string). Commit message says changed types to string. Hmm, current entity has pensAlim int. But wait, the commit e0765bd200 changed types to string for pensão fields? But the entity currently shows integer for pensAlim and decimal for percAliment/vrAlim. Actually the entity shown might reflect the state after change? decimal -> string getters return ?string. Yes percAliment/vrAlim getters return ?string and column decimal. Actually decimal maps to string in PHP. OK. In applyEsocialS2299Payload: - pensAlim maps to intOrNull and setPensAlim(?int). OK. - percAliment decimalOrNull -> returns a numeric string -> setPercAliment(?string). OK. Now note: the fields dataTypes. intOrNull for pensAlim returns int if numeric. Fine. Now let's focus on the migration. Let me read the FlowTemplate entity to see the columns and required non-null fields, and check whether there are other NOT NULL columns that the migration doesn't set (like created_by, is_system?). Also check `flow_templates.template_category` allowed values? Might be string. Let me read FlowTemplate entity.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Entity/FlowTemplate.php"}
File: src/Entity/FlowTemplate.php (Total lines: 494)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-494
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Entity;
4|
5|use App\Repository\FlowTemplateRepository;
6|use Doctrine\Common\Collections\ArrayCollection;
7|use Doctrine\Common\Collections\Collection;
8|use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
9|use App\Entity\FlowTemplateProduct;
10|
11|/**
12| * FlowTemplate - Template configurável de workflow
13| * Criado por "Novo Flow" dentro de um Workflow
14| * 
15| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass=FlowTemplateRepository::class)
16| * @ORM\Table(name="flow_templates")
17| */
18|class FlowTemplate
19|{
20|    /**
21|     * @ORM\Id
22|     * @ORM\GeneratedValue
23|     * @ORM\Column(type="integer")
24|     */
25|    private $id;
26|
27|    /**
28|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity=Workflow::class, inversedBy="flowTemplates")
29|     * @ORM\JoinColumn(nullable=false)
30|     */
31|    private $workflow;
32|
33|    /**
34|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity=Company::class)
35|     * @ORM\JoinColumn(nullable=false)
36|     */
37|    private $company;
38|
39|    /**
40|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=255)
41|     */
42|    private $name;
43|
44|    /**
45|     * @ORM\Column(type="text", nullable=true)
46|     */
47|    private $description;
48|
49|    /**
50|     * @ORM\Column(type="boolean", options={"default": true})
51|     */
52|    private $isActive = true;
53|
54|    /**
55|     * @ORM\OneToMany(targetEntity=FlowTemplateProduct::class, mappedBy="flowTemplate", cascade={"persist", "remove"}, orphanRemoval=true)
56|     * @ORM\OrderBy({"orderIndex" = "ASC"})
57|     */
58|    private $templateProducts;
59|
60|    /**
61|     * @ORM\OneToMany(targetEntity=FlowStage::class, mappedBy="flowTemplate", cascade={"persist", "remove"})
62|     * @ORM\OrderBy({"orderIndex" = "ASC"})
63|     */
64|    private $stages;
65|
66|    /**
67|     * @ORM\Column(type="text", nullable=true)
68|     */
69|    private $bpmnXml;
70|
71|    /**
72|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=255, nullable=true)
73|     */
74|    private $processDefinitionKey;
75|
76|    /**
77|     * @ORM\Column(type="datetime")
78|     */
79|    private $createdAt;
80|
81|    /**
82|     * @ORM\Column(type="datetime")
83|     */
84|    private $updatedAt;
85|
86|    /**
87|     * Template-level settings (e.g. cv_analysis_ia, cv_analysis_manual, guided_process_ia)
88|     * Stored as JSON so the offcanvas can pre-check advanced feature flags.
89|     *
90|     * @ORM\Column(type="json", nullable=true)
91|     */
92|    private $settings = [];
93|
94|    /**
95|     * Categoria do template para filtros eficientes no banco.
96|     * Valores: null (genérico), 'initial_cycle'
97|     *
98|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=50, nullable=true)
99|     */
100|    private ?string $templateCategory = null;
101|
102|    /**
103|     * @ORM\OneToMany(targetEntity=FlowInstance::class, mappedBy="flowTemplate", cascade={"remove"})
104|     */
105|    private $flowInstances;
106|
107|    public function __construct()
108|    {
109|        $this->templateProducts = new ArrayCollection();
110|        $this->stages = new ArrayCollection();
111|        $this->flowInstances = new ArrayCollection();
112|        $this->createdAt = new \DateTime();
113|        $this->updatedAt = new \DateTime();
114|    }
115|
116|    /**
117|     * @ORM\PreUpdate
118|     */
119|    public function preUpdate(): void
120|    {
121|        $this->updatedAt = new \DateTime();
122|    }
123|
124|    public function getId(): ?int
125|    {
126|        return $this->id;
127|    }
128|
129|    public function getWorkflow(): ?Workflow
130|    {
131|        return $this->workflow;
132|    }
133|
134|    public function setWorkflow(?Workflow $workflow): self
135|    {
136|        $this->workflow = $workflow;
137|        return $this;
138|    }
139|
140|    public function getCompany(): ?Company
141|    {
142|        return $this->company;
143|    }
144|
145|    public function setCompany(?Company $company): self
146|    {
147|        $this->company = $company;
148|        return $this;
149|    }
150|
151|    public function getName(): ?string
152|    {
153|        return $this->name;
154|    }
155|
156|    public function setName(string $name): self
157|    {
158|        $this->name = $name;
159|        return $this;
160|    }
161|
162|    public function getDescription(): ?string
163|    {
164|        return $this->description;
165|    }
166|
167|    public function setDescription(?string $description): self
168|    {
169|        $this->description = $description;
170|        return $this;
171|    }
172|
173|    public function getIsActive(): ?bool
174|    {
175|        return $this->isActive;
176|    }
177|
178|    public function setIsActive(bool $isActive): self
179|    {
180|        $this->isActive = $isActive;
181|        return $this;
182|    }
183|
184|    /**
185|     * @return Collection|FlowTemplateProduct[]
186|     */
187|    public function getTemplateProducts(): Collection
188|    {
189|        return $this->templateProducts;
190|    }
191|
192|    public function addTemplateProduct(FlowTemplateProduct $templateProduct): self
193|    {
194|        if (!$this->templateProducts->contains($templateProduct)) {
195|            $this->templateProducts[] = $templateProduct;
196|            $templateProduct->setFlowTemplate($this);
197|        }
198|        return $this;
199|    }
200|
201|    public function removeTemplateProduct(FlowTemplateProduct $templateProduct): self
202|    {
203|        if ($this->templateProducts->removeElement($templateProduct)) {
204|            if ($templateProduct->getFlowTemplate() === $this) {
205|                $templateProduct->setFlowTemplate(null);
206|            }
207|        }
208|        return $this;
209|    }
210|
211|    /**
212|     * Retorna os produtos ordenados
213|     * @return Product[]
214|     */
215|    public function getProducts(): array
216|    {
217|        $products = [];
218|        foreach ($this->templateProducts as $templateProduct) {
219|            $products[] = $templateProduct->getProduct();
220|        }
221|        return $products;
222|    }
223|
224|    /**
225|     * Adds a product to the template, supporting multiple slots of the same product.
226|     *
227|     * When $slotIndex is null the method auto-assigns the next available slot for that
228|     * product (0 if first occurrence, 1 for second, etc.).
229|     *
230|     * When the exact (product, slotIndex) pair already exists, the existing row is
231|     * updated with the new $orderIndex and $templateType instead of creating a duplicate.
232|     */
233|    public function addProduct(
234|        Product $product,
235|        ?int    $orderIndex   = null,
236|        string  $templateType = 'fixo',
237|        ?int    $slotIndex    = null,
238|    ): self {
239|        // Resolve slotIndex: auto-pick next free slot when not supplied
240|        if ($slotIndex === null) {
241|            $maxSlot = -1;
242|            foreach ($this->templateProducts as $tp) {
243|                if ($tp->getProduct() && $tp->getProduct()->getId() === $product->getId()) {
244|                    $maxSlot = max($maxSlot, $tp->getSlotIndex());
245|                }
246|            }
247|            $slotIndex = $maxSlot + 1; // 0 if first, N+1 for Nth duplicate
248|        }
249|
250|        // Update existing (product, slot) pair if already present
251|        foreach ($this->templateProducts as $templateProduct) {
252|            if (
253|                $templateProduct->getProduct() &&
254|                $templateProduct->getProduct()->getId() === $product->getId() &&
255|                $templateProduct->getSlotIndex() === $slotIndex
256|            ) {
257|                if ($orderIndex !== null) {
258|                    $templateProduct->setOrderIndex($orderIndex);
259|                }
260|                $templateProduct->setTemplateType($templateType);
261|                return $this;
262|            }
263|        }
264|
265|        // Create new slot entry
266|        $templateProduct = new FlowTemplateProduct();
267|        $templateProduct->setFlowTemplate($this);
268|        $templateProduct->setProduct($product);
269|        $templateProduct->setSlotIndex($slotIndex);
270|        $templateProduct->setOrderIndex($orderIndex ?? $this->templateProducts->count());
271|        $templateProduct->setTemplateType($templateType);
272|        $this->addTemplateProduct($templateProduct);
273|
274|        return $this;
275|    }
276|
277|    /**
278|     * Removes a specific slot of a product.
279|     * When $slotIndex is null, removes the first (slot 0) occurrence.
280|     */
281|    public function removeProduct(Product $product, ?int $slotIndex = null): self
282|    {
283|        $targetSlot = $slotIndex ?? 0;
284|        foreach ($this->templateProducts as $templateProduct) {
285|            if (
286|                $templateProduct->getProduct() &&
287|                $templateProduct->getProduct()->getId() === $product->getId() &&
288|                $templateProduct->getSlotIndex() === $targetSlot
289|            ) {
290|                $this->removeTemplateProduct($templateProduct);
291|                break;
292|            }
293|        }
294|        return $this;
295|    }
296|
297|    /**
298|     * Returns the next available slot index for a product (useful before calling addProduct).
299|     */
300|    public function nextSlotIndexForProduct(Product $product): int
301|    {
302|        $maxSlot = -1;
303|        foreach ($this->templateProducts as $tp) {
304|            if ($tp->getProduct() && $tp->getProduct()->getId() === $product->getId()) {
305|                $maxSlot = max($maxSlot, $tp->getSlotIndex());
306|            }
307|        }
308|        return $maxSlot + 1;
309|    }
310|
311|    /**
312|     * Returns how many slots of a given product exist in this template.
313|     */
314|    public function countProductSlots(Product $product): int
315|    {
316|        $count = 0;
317|        foreach ($this->templateProducts as $tp) {
318|            if ($tp->getProduct() && $tp->getProduct()->getId() === $product->getId()) {
319|                $count++;
320|            }
321|        }
322|        return $count;
323|    }
324|
325|    /**
326|     * @return Collection|FlowStage[]
327|     */
328|    public function getStages(): Collection
329|    {
330|        return $this->stages;
331|    }
332|
333|    public function addStage(FlowStage $stage): self
334|    {
335|        if (!$this->stages->contains($stage)) {
336|            $this->stages[] = $stage;
337|            $stage->setFlowTemplate($this);
338|        }
339|        return $this;
340|    }
341|
342|    public function removeStage(FlowStage $stage): self
343|    {
344|        if ($this->stages->removeElement($stage)) {
345|            if ($stage->getFlowTemplate() === $this) {
346|                $stage->setFlowTemplate(null);
347|            }
348|        }
349|        return $this;
350|    }
351|
352|    public function getBpmnXml(): ?string
353|    {
354|        return $this->bpmnXml;
355|    }
356|
357|    public function setBpmnXml(?string $bpmnXml): self
358|    {
359|        $this->bpmnXml = $bpmnXml;
360|        return $this;
361|    }
362|
363|    public function getProcessDefinitionKey(): ?string
364|    {
365|        return $this->processDefinitionKey;
366|    }
367|
368|    public function setProcessDefinitionKey(?string $processDefinitionKey): self
369|    {
370|        $this->processDefinitionKey = $processDefinitionKey;
371|        return $this;
372|    }
373|
374|    public function getCreatedAt(): ?\DateTimeInterface
375|    {
376|        return $this->createdAt;
377|    }
378|
379|    public function setCreatedAt(\DateTimeInterface $createdAt): self
380|    {
381|        $this->createdAt = $createdAt;
382|        return $this;
383|    }
384|
385|    public function getUpdatedAt(): ?\DateTimeInterface
386|    {
387|        return $this->updatedAt;
388|    }
389|
390|    public function setUpdatedAt(\DateTimeInterface $updatedAt): self
391|    {
392|        $this->updatedAt = $updatedAt;
393|        return $this;
394|    }
395|
396|    /**
397|     * @return Collection|FlowInstance[]
398|     */
399|    public function getFlowInstances(): Collection
400|    {
401|        return $this->flowInstances;
402|    }
403|
404|    public function addFlowInstance(FlowInstance $flowInstance): self
405|    {
406|        if (!$this->flowInstances->contains($flowInstance)) {
407|            $this->flowInstances[] = $flowInstance;
408|            $flowInstance->setFlowTemplate($this);
409|        }
410|        return $this;
411|    }
412|
413|    public function removeFlowInstance(FlowInstance $flowInstance): self
414|    {
415|        if ($this->flowInstances->removeElement($flowInstance)) {
416|            if ($flowInstance->getFlowTemplate() === $this) {
417|                $flowInstance->setFlowTemplate(null);
418|            }
419|        }
420|        return $this;
421|    }
422|
423|    public function getSettings(): ?array
424|    {
425|        return $this->settings;
426|    }
427|
428|    public function setSettings(?array $settings): self
429|    {
430|        $this->settings = $settings;
431|        return $this;
432|    }
433|
434|    /**
435|     * Get a single setting value by key, with an optional default.
436|     */
437|    public function getSetting(string $key, $default = null)
438|    {
439|        return $this->settings[$key] ?? $default;
440|    }
441|
442|    /**
443|     * Set a single setting value by key.
444|     */
445|    public function setSetting(string $key, $value): self
446|    {
447|        $this->settings[$key] = $value;
448|        return $this;
449|    }
450|
451|    public function getTemplateCategory(): ?string
452|    {
453|        return $this->templateCategory;
454|    }
455|
456|    public function setTemplateCategory(?string $templateCategory): self
457|    {
458|        $this->templateCategory = $templateCategory;
459|        return $this;
460|    }
461|
462|    public function isInitialCycle(): bool
463|    {
464|        return $this->templateCategory === 'initial_cycle';
465|    }
466|
467|    /**
468|     * Retorna true para qualquer tipo de ciclo (initial_cycle, permanent_cycle, annual_cycle, etc.).
469|     * Convenção: categories de ciclo terminam em "_cycle".
470|     */
471|    public function isCycle(): bool
472|    {
473|        return str_ends_with((string) $this->templateCategory, '_cycle');
474|    }
475|
476|    /**
477|     * Retorna o rótulo legível do tipo de ciclo, ou null se não for um ciclo.
478|     * Usado para exibição no Kanban e seletores de automação.
479|     */
480|    public function getCycleLabel(): ?string
481|    {
482|        return match ($this->templateCategory) {
483|            'initial_cycle'    => 'Ciclo Inicial',
484|            'metahuman_journey_cycle' => 'Jornada Metahuman',
485|            'permanent_cycle'  => 'Ciclo Permanente',
486|            'annual_cycle'     => 'Ciclo Anual',
487|            default            => $this->templateCategory !== null && str_ends_with($this->templateCategory, '_cycle')
488|                                  ? ucfirst(str_replace(['_cycle', '_'], [' ', ' '], $this->templateCategory))
489|                                  : null,
490|        };
491|    }
492|}
493|
494|
Request #36 deepseek-v4-flash P:56.81K C:412 CR:52.48K CW:0 4175ms
Reasoning
FlowTemplate columns required: workflow_id, company_id, name, is_active (default true), created_at, updated_at. The migration sets those. Description nullable. settings nullable JSON. template_category nullable. Good. Now let me check the other seeded commands (SeedPayrollFlowTemplatesCommand, SeedFinancialFlowTemplatesCommand) to compare patterns of insert including columns. In particular, verify `flow_templates` insert doesn't require extra NOT NULL columns not in entity (like `created_by`, `version`?). Not found in entity, so fine. But careful about potential DB-level mismatch between entity annotations and actual DB schema (the migration is run against a schema where these columns exist). The migration queries actual DB. Now important: check `flow_stages` columns referenced in migration: flow_template_id, product_id, name, description, order_index, advance_rules, stage_category, phase_number, product_slot_index. Let me look at the FlowStage entity to check the column names & NOT NULL constraints, in particular `stage_category`, `phase_number`, and whether `fixed_stage_type`, `automations` etc exist. Let me read FlowStage entity and FlowAutomation entity to verify the columns used by migration inserts (flow_automations insert references flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, fixed_stage_type, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index). Also ensure the automation entity has flow_template_id column; the insert uses NULL for flow_template_id and fixed_stage_type. Let me read FlowStage and FlowAutomation entities.
Tool Calls (2)
file_find
Show Details
{"query_name": "FlowStage.php"}
src/Entity/FlowStage.php
file_find
Show Details
{"query_name": "FlowAutomation.php"}
src/Entity/FlowAutomation.php
Request #37 deepseek-v4-flash P:57.25K C:89 CR:57.22K CW:0 2149ms
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Entity/FlowStage.php"}
File: src/Entity/FlowStage.php (Total lines: 289)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-289
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Entity;
4|
5|use App\Repository\FlowStageRepository;
6|use Doctrine\Common\Collections\ArrayCollection;
7|use Doctrine\Common\Collections\Collection;
8|use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
9|
10|/**
11| * FlowStage - Etapa variável do template
12| * Apenas para etapas VARIÁVEIS configuráveis pelo usuário
13| * Etapas fixas (Reprovados, Aprovados) NÃO são guardadas aqui
14| * 
15| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass=FlowStageRepository::class)
16| * @ORM\Table(name="flow_stages")
17| */
18|class FlowStage
19|{
20|    /**
21|     * @ORM\Id
22|     * @ORM\GeneratedValue
23|     * @ORM\Column(type="integer")
24|     */
25|    private $id;
26|
27|    /**
28|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity=FlowTemplate::class, inversedBy="stages")
29|     * @ORM\JoinColumn(nullable=false, onDelete="CASCADE")
30|     */
31|    private $flowTemplate;
32|
33|    /**
34|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=255)
35|     */
36|    private $name;
37|
38|    /**
39|     * @ORM\Column(type="text", nullable=true)
40|     */
41|    private $description;
42|
43|    /**
44|     * @ORM\Column(type="integer")
45|     */
46|    private $orderIndex;
47|
48|    /**
49|     * @ORM\OneToMany(targetEntity=FlowActivity::class, mappedBy="flowStage", cascade={"persist", "remove"})
50|     * @ORM\OrderBy({"orderIndex" = "ASC"})
51|     */
52|    private $activities;
53|
54|    /**
55|     * @ORM\OneToMany(targetEntity=FlowAutomation::class, mappedBy="flowStage", cascade={"persist", "remove"})
56|     * @ORM\OrderBy({"orderIndex" = "ASC"})
57|     */
58|    private $automations;
59|
60|    /**
61|     * @ORM\Column(type="json", nullable=true)
62|     */
63|    private $advanceRules = [];
64|
65|    /**
66|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity=Product::class)
67|     * @ORM\JoinColumn(nullable=true, onDelete="SET NULL")
68|     */
69|    private $product;
70|
71|    /**
72|     * Categoria da etapa dentro de um Ciclo Inicial.
73|     * Valores: null (etapa genérica), 'andamento', 'feedback_1on1', 'continuidade', 'encerramento'
74|     *
75|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=50, nullable=true)
76|     */
77|    private ?string $stageCategory = null;
78|
79|    /**
80|     * Número da fase à qual esta etapa pertence (1, 2 ou 3).
81|     * Null para etapas finais (continuidade/encerramento) e etapas genéricas.
82|     *
83|     * @ORM\Column(type="integer", nullable=true)
84|     */
85|    private ?int $phaseNumber = null;
86|
87|    /**
88|     * Zero-based slot index of the product occurrence this stage belongs to.
89|     * NULL is treated as slot 0 for backwards compatibility with legacy stages
90|     * created before multi-slot support was introduced.
91|     *
92|     * @ORM\Column(type="integer", nullable=true, options={"default": null})
93|     */
94|    private ?int $productSlotIndex = null;
95|
96|    public function __construct()
97|    {
98|        $this->activities = new ArrayCollection();
99|        $this->automations = new ArrayCollection();
100|    }
101|
102|    public function getId(): ?int
103|    {
104|        return $this->id;
105|    }
106|
107|    public function getFlowTemplate(): ?FlowTemplate
108|    {
109|        return $this->flowTemplate;
110|    }
111|
112|    public function setFlowTemplate(?FlowTemplate $flowTemplate): self
113|    {
114|        $this->flowTemplate = $flowTemplate;
115|        return $this;
116|    }
117|
118|    public function getName(): ?string
119|    {
120|        return $this->name;
121|    }
122|
123|    public function setName(string $name): self
124|    {
125|        $this->name = $name;
126|        return $this;
127|    }
128|
129|    public function getDescription(): ?string
130|    {
131|        return $this->description;
132|    }
133|
134|    public function setDescription(?string $description): self
135|    {
136|        $this->description = $description;
137|        return $this;
138|    }
139|
140|    public function getOrderIndex(): ?int
141|    {
142|        return $this->orderIndex;
143|    }
144|
145|    public function setOrderIndex(int $orderIndex): self
146|    {
147|        $this->orderIndex = $orderIndex;
148|        return $this;
149|    }
150|
151|    /**
152|     * @return Collection|FlowActivity[]
153|     */
154|    public function getActivities(): Collection
155|    {
156|        return $this->activities;
157|    }
158|
159|    public function addActivity(FlowActivity $activity): self
160|    {
161|        if (!$this->activities->contains($activity)) {
162|            $this->activities[] = $activity;
163|            $activity->setFlowStage($this);
164|        }
165|        return $this;
166|    }
167|
168|    public function removeActivity(FlowActivity $activity): self
169|    {
170|        if ($this->activities->removeElement($activity)) {
171|            if ($activity->getFlowStage() === $this) {
172|                $activity->setFlowStage(null);
173|            }
174|        }
175|        return $this;
176|    }
177|
178|    /**
179|     * @return Collection|FlowAutomation[]
180|     */
181|    public function getAutomations(): Collection
182|    {
183|        return $this->automations;
184|    }
185|
186|    public function addAutomation(FlowAutomation $automation): self
187|    {
188|        if (!$this->automations->contains($automation)) {
189|            $this->automations[] = $automation;
190|            $automation->setFlowStage($this);
191|        }
192|        return $this;
193|    }
194|
195|    public function removeAutomation(FlowAutomation $automation): self
196|    {
197|        if ($this->automations->removeElement($automation)) {
198|            if ($automation->getFlowStage() === $this) {
199|                $automation->setFlowStage(null);
200|            }
201|        }
202|        return $this;
203|    }
204|
205|    public function getAdvanceRules(): ?array
206|    {
207|        return $this->advanceRules;
208|    }
209|
210|    public function setAdvanceRules(?array $advanceRules): self
211|    {
212|        $this->advanceRules = $advanceRules;
213|        return $this;
214|    }
215|
216|    public function getProduct(): ?Product
217|    {
218|        return $this->product;
219|    }
220|
221|    public function setProduct(?Product $product): self
222|    {
223|        $this->product = $product;
224|        return $this;
225|    }
226|
227|    public function getStageCategory(): ?string
228|    {
229|        return $this->stageCategory;
230|    }
231|
232|    public function setStageCategory(?string $stageCategory): self
233|    {
234|        $this->stageCategory = $stageCategory;
235|        return $this;
236|    }
237|
238|    public function getPhaseNumber(): ?int
239|    {
240|        return $this->phaseNumber;
241|    }
242|
243|    public function setPhaseNumber(?int $phaseNumber): self
244|    {
245|        $this->phaseNumber = $phaseNumber;
246|        return $this;
247|    }
248|
249|    public function isAndamento(): bool
250|    {
251|        return $this->stageCategory === 'andamento';
252|    }
253|
254|    public function isFeedback1on1(): bool
255|    {
256|        return $this->stageCategory === 'feedback_1on1';
257|    }
258|
259|    public function isContinuidade(): bool
260|    {
261|        return $this->stageCategory === 'continuidade';
262|    }
263|
264|    public function isEncerramento(): bool
265|    {
266|        return $this->stageCategory === 'encerramento';
267|    }
268|
269|    public function getProductSlotIndex(): ?int
270|    {
271|        return $this->productSlotIndex;
272|    }
273|
274|    public function setProductSlotIndex(?int $productSlotIndex): self
275|    {
276|        $this->productSlotIndex = $productSlotIndex;
277|        return $this;
278|    }
279|
280|    /**
281|     * Returns the effective slot index: treats NULL as 0 (legacy rows = first slot).
282|     */
283|    public function getEffectiveSlotIndex(): int
284|    {
285|        return $this->productSlotIndex ?? 0;
286|    }
287|}
288|
289|
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Entity/FlowAutomation.php"}
File: src/Entity/FlowAutomation.php (Total lines: 243)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-243
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Entity;
4|
5|use App\Repository\FlowAutomationRepository;
6|use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
7|
8|/**
9| * FlowAutomation - Automação executada em uma etapa
10| * Equivalente a ações no Flowable
11| * 
12| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass=FlowAutomationRepository::class)
13| * @ORM\Table(name="flow_automations")
14| */
15|class FlowAutomation
16|{
17|    /**
18|     * @ORM\Id
19|     * @ORM\GeneratedValue
20|     * @ORM\Column(type="integer")
21|     */
22|    private $id;
23|
24|    /**
25|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity=FlowStage::class, inversedBy="automations")
26|     * @ORM\JoinColumn(nullable=true, onDelete="CASCADE")
27|     */
28|    private $flowStage;
29|
30|    /**
31|     * Template reference for fixed stage automations (when flowStage is null)
32|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity=FlowTemplate::class)
33|     * @ORM\JoinColumn(nullable=true, onDelete="CASCADE")
34|     */
35|    private $flowTemplate;
36|
37|    /**
38|     * Type of fixed stage: 'rejected', 'approved', 'completed', or null for regular stages
39|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=50, nullable=true)
40|     */
41|    private $fixedStageType;
42|
43|    /**
44|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=255)
45|     */
46|    private $name;
47|
48|    /**
49|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=100)
50|     * @deprecated Use conditions array instead. Mantido para compatibilidade.
51|     */
52|    private $triggerType;
53|
54|    /**
55|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=100)
56|     * @deprecated Use actions array instead. Mantido para compatibilidade.
57|     */
58|    private $actionType;
59|
60|    /**
61|     * @ORM\Column(type="json")
62|     * @deprecated Use actions array instead. Mantido para compatibilidade.
63|     */
64|    private $actionConfig = [];
65|
66|    /**
67|     * @ORM\Column(type="json", nullable=true)
68|     * Array de condições (triggers) da automação
69|     * Formato: [{"type": "on_enter", "config": {...}, "orderIndex": 0}, ...]
70|     */
71|    private $conditions = [];
72|
73|    /**
74|     * @ORM\Column(type="json", nullable=true)
75|     * Array de ações da automação
76|     * Formato: [{"type": "notify", "config": {...}, "orderIndex": 0}, ...]
77|     */
78|    private $actions = [];
79|
80|    /**
81|     * @ORM\Column(type="boolean", options={"default": true})
82|     */
83|    private $isActive = true;
84|
85|    /**
86|     * @ORM\Column(type="integer")
87|     */
88|    private $orderIndex;
89|
90|    public function getId(): ?int
91|    {
92|        return $this->id;
93|    }
94|
95|    public function getFlowStage(): ?FlowStage
96|    {
97|        return $this->flowStage;
98|    }
99|
100|    public function setFlowStage(?FlowStage $flowStage): self
101|    {
102|        $this->flowStage = $flowStage;
103|        return $this;
104|    }
105|
106|    public function getFlowTemplate(): ?FlowTemplate
107|    {
108|        return $this->flowTemplate;
109|    }
110|
111|    public function setFlowTemplate(?FlowTemplate $flowTemplate): self
112|    {
113|        $this->flowTemplate = $flowTemplate;
114|        return $this;
115|    }
116|
117|    public function getFixedStageType(): ?string
118|    {
119|        return $this->fixedStageType;
120|    }
121|
122|    public function setFixedStageType(?string $fixedStageType): self
123|    {
124|        $this->fixedStageType = $fixedStageType;
125|        return $this;
126|    }
127|
128|    /**
129|     * Check if this automation belongs to a fixed stage (Reprovados/Aprovados/Concluído)
130|     */
131|    public function isFixedStageAutomation(): bool
132|    {
133|        return $this->fixedStageType !== null;
134|    }
135|
136|    public function getName(): ?string
137|    {
138|        return $this->name;
139|    }
140|
141|    public function setName(string $name): self
142|    {
143|        $this->name = $name;
144|        return $this;
145|    }
146|
147|    public function getTriggerType(): ?string
148|    {
149|        return $this->triggerType;
150|    }
151|
152|    public function setTriggerType(string $triggerType): self
153|    {
154|        $this->triggerType = $triggerType;
155|        return $this;
156|    }
157|
158|    public function getActionType(): ?string
159|    {
160|        return $this->actionType;
161|    }
162|
163|    public function setActionType(string $actionType): self
164|    {
165|        $this->actionType = $actionType;
166|        return $this;
167|    }
168|
169|    public function getActionConfig(): ?array
170|    {
171|        return $this->actionConfig;
172|    }
173|
174|    public function setActionConfig(array $actionConfig): self
175|    {
176|        $this->actionConfig = $actionConfig;
177|        return $this;
178|    }
179|
180|    public function getIsActive(): ?bool
181|    {
182|        return $this->isActive;
183|    }
184|
185|    public function setIsActive(bool $isActive): self
186|    {
187|        $this->isActive = $isActive;
188|        return $this;
189|    }
190|
191|    public function getOrderIndex(): ?int
192|    {
193|        return $this->orderIndex;
194|    }
195|
196|    public function setOrderIndex(int $orderIndex): self
197|    {
198|        $this->orderIndex = $orderIndex;
199|        return $this;
200|    }
201|
202|    /**
203|     * Retorna as condições (triggers) da automação
204|     * @return array
205|     */
206|    public function getConditions(): array
207|    {
208|        return $this->conditions ?? [];
209|    }
210|
211|    /**
212|     * Define as condições (triggers) da automação
213|     * @param array $conditions
214|     * @return self
215|     */
216|    public function setConditions(array $conditions): self
217|    {
218|        $this->conditions = $conditions;
219|        return $this;
220|    }
221|
222|    /**
223|     * Retorna as ações da automação
224|     * @return array
225|     */
226|    public function getActions(): array
227|    {
228|        return $this->actions ?? [];
229|    }
230|
231|    /**
232|     * Define as ações da automação
233|     * @param array $actions
234|     * @return self
235|     */
236|    public function setActions(array $actions): self
237|    {
238|        $this->actions = $actions;
239|        return $this;
240|    }
241|}
242|
243|
Request #38 deepseek-v4-flash P:61.57K C:1.22K CR:57.22K CW:0 9768ms
Reasoning
The entities exist as expected. The migration inserts into those tables. Now the key open item: In the migration, when the template is seeded on a workflow `fluxo-de-saida` that already has an existing template (e.g., pre-existing "Offboarding" template from other company flows). The migration creates a brand new template. But wait — flow templates relate to workflows that are per company, so each company with the 'fluxo-de-saida' workflow gets a new template. OK. But there's a subtle issue with seeding: `ensureOffboardingStages` uses `flow_template_products` with slot_index = 0; stage product_slot_index NULL is treated as slot 0. Good. But — will these seeded stages break if there are ALREADY stages on the workflow for offboarding product at slot 0 from an existing template? No, each template has its own stages. Another thing: In `ensureAutomation`, name matching is used to dedupe. But `ensureStage` dedupes by stage name, so re-running migration after partial failure will reuse same stage IDs. Good. Wait - Actually there's a subtle bug: `ensureStage` lookup uses `product_slot_index IS NULL`. But the new template has exactly one product at slot 0, and the stage is inserted with product_slot_index NULL. Fine. Now, potential migration idempotency issue: What if a company already has template stages with the same names but not created by this migration? It only searches within flow_template_id = this template, so no cross-template conflicts. Now — the biggest question I want to verify for the migration: whether `flow_stages` has a DB-level unique constraint that would cause conflicts with existing stages... Probably not. Potential migration problem: `up()` early returns if any of the tables don't exist (returning without error). But other migrations run in order; flow tables presumably exist in production by now. Given guard. Potential migration bug: uses `$this->connection->fetchAllAssociative` with `SELECT id, company_id FROM workflows WHERE slug = :slug` — no filter by product/module/company feature. Confirmed finding #1 covers. But is there a **company isolation** angle: this is a seed migration that applies to ALL companies that have a 'fluxo-de-saida' workflow, without verifying company actually has the offboarding module enabled. In the service, action execution checks offboarding context only. But the seeded template on companies without offboarding module would surface a template with automations referencing an action that requires offboarding. The migration should limit to companies with the offboarding module. Confirmed finding #1 already covers that. So don't repeat. Now, let me carefully look at other possible issues in the AutomationExecutionService diff that are NOT already flagged: 1. **The `system_sender` refactor affects existing payroll notification** (widening to any config with system_sender true). This is in scope. 2. **executeNotify new in-app Notification body & button**... Wait, the important thing is in executeNotify there's the `emailConfig['system_sender'] = $config['system_sender'] ?? null;`. Since executeNotify is a method with many call sites, adding `system_sender` to the config will cause `sendChatNotification` to treat those as system sender... only if config sets it true. Existing call sites don't. OK. But there is a subtle problem: `$config` passed into `executeNotify` from automation actions includes arbitrary user-config keys; user can set system_sender? Actually, in the automation UI, config is built from automation config schema. Users might be able to set `system_sender`? If user config sets `system_sender=true` for arbitrary 'notify' automations... Actually the config schema for notify likely doesn't include `system_sender`. Not a security issue. 3. **`buildEsocialS2299ReviewUrl`** — query string appended using raw concatenation after router-generated path. router->generate returns encoded path; appending '?esocialTab=desligamento' fine. The URL doesn't need escape at that point. Good. Wait, one issue: The review URL is a member page for the dismissed employee (`my_company_member_manage`). The notification goes to the *responsible* (could be the flow responsible). Does the responsible have access to that member's manage page? Presumably responsible of the offboarding can see. Not necessarily issue. Actually, let me reconsider the intent: In the PR description: "O botão 'ver detalhes' direciona para o chat com a Adriana, onde fica a orientação para revisar o desligamento." and the notificationsCenterService buttonUrl = '/chat?adriana=1'. That's the in-app notification. But the message_html's button goes to reviewUrl (member manage page, esocialTab=desligamento). Fine. 4. Let me re-examine the **`findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding`** and second-flush for new event. In the 'created' branch, event is new; its ID null at first flush. Actually they flush at line ~? Let me read the full method block 14924-15412 to double-check exact ordering/line numbers, plus the interplay between the event branch and the metadata flush. Let me read that section fully.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 15320, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 14924}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15626)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 14924-15320
14924|        return $this->offboardingToRecruitment->createFromOffboarding($member, $config, $context);
14925|    }
14926|
14927|    private function executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
14928|    {
14929|        if (!$member instanceof FlowInstanceMember) {
14930|            return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Membro não encontrado'];
14931|        }
14932|
14933|        if ($member->getSourceType() !== 'offboarding') {
14934|            return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Esta ação só pode ser usada em contexto de offboarding'];
14935|        }
14936|
14937|        $flowInstance = $member->getFlowInstance();
14938|        $company = $flowInstance?->getCompany();
14939|        if (!$company instanceof Company || $company->getEsocialMode() === null) {
14940|            return ['executed' => false, 'skipped' => true, 'reason' => 'esocial_disabled'];
14941|        }
14942|
14943|        try {
14944|            $offboardingMember = $this->findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember($member);
14945|            if (!$offboardingMember) {
14946|                return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'OffboardingMember não encontrado'];
14947|            }
14948|
14949|            $companyMember = $offboardingMember->getCompanyMember();
14950|            if (!$companyMember instanceof CompanyMembers) {
14951|                return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Colaborador do offboarding não encontrado'];
14952|            }
14953|
14954|            $responsible = $this->resolveEsocialS2299Responsible($config, $member, $offboardingMember);
14955|            if (!$responsible instanceof CompanyMembers) {
14956|                $this->log('warning', 'Responsável do S-2299 não resolvido para automação de offboarding', [
14957|                    'flowInstanceMemberId' => $member->getId(),
14958|                    'offboardingMemberId' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
14959|                ]);
14960|
14961|                return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Responsável pelo preenchimento do S-2299 não encontrado'];
14962|            }
14963|
14964|            $esocialTrabalhador = $this->entityManager
14965|                ->getRepository(EsocialDadosTrabalhador::class)
14966|                ->findOneBy(['companyMember' => $companyMember]);
14967|
14968|            $payload = $this->buildEsocialS2299DraftPayload($offboardingMember, $companyMember, $responsible, $config);
14969|            $event = null;
14970|            $eventStatus = 'draft_only';
14971|            $missing = [];
14972|
14973|            if (!$esocialTrabalhador instanceof EsocialDadosTrabalhador) {
14974|                $missing[] = 'esocial_worker_data';
14975|            } else {
14976|                $remuneracao = $this->entityManager
14977|                    ->getRepository(EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class)
14978|                    ->findByTrabalhador($esocialTrabalhador);
14979|
14980|                if (!$remuneracao instanceof EsocialDadosRemuneracao) {
14981|                    $missing[] = 'esocial_remuneration_data';
14982|                } else {
14983|                    $event = $this->findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding($member, $offboardingMember, $company, $esocialTrabalhador, $remuneracao);
14984|                    if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $event->getStatus() !== 'pendente') {
14985|                        $eventStatus = 'existing_not_editable';
14986|                    } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
14987|                        $event->setUpdatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
14988|                        $eventStatus = 'updated';
14989|                    } else {
14990|                        $event = $this->findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal($company, $esocialTrabalhador, $remuneracao, $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate());
14991|                        if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
14992|                            $eventStatus = 'existing_not_editable';
14993|                        } else {
14994|                            $event = $this->createEsocialS2299DraftEvent($company, $esocialTrabalhador);
14995|                            $eventStatus = 'created';
14996|                        }
14997|                    }
14998|
14999|                    if ($eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable') {
15000|                        $event->setDadosRemuneracao($remuneracao);
15001|                        $this->applyEsocialS2299Payload($event, $payload, $eventStatus === 'updated');
15002|                        $this->entityManager->persist($event);
15003|                    }
15004|                }
15005|            }
15006|
15007|            $reviewUrl = $this->buildEsocialS2299ReviewUrl($companyMember);
15008|            $metadata = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? [];
15009|            if (!is_array($metadata)) {
15010|                $metadata = [];
15011|            }
15012|
15013|            $metadata['esocialS2299Draft'] = [
15014|                'payload' => $payload,
15015|                'offboardingMemberId' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
15016|                'companyMemberId' => $companyMember->getId(),
15017|                'responsibleId' => $responsible->getId(),
15018|                'eventId' => $event?->getId(),
15019|                'eventStatus' => $eventStatus,
15020|                'missing' => $missing,
15021|                'reviewUrl' => $reviewUrl,
15022|                'updatedAt' => (new \DateTimeImmutable())->format('c'),
15023|            ];
15024|
15025|            $member->setSourceMetadata($metadata);
15026|            $this->entityManager->persist($member);
15027|            $this->entityManager->flush();
15028|
15029|            if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
15030|                $metadata = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? [];
15031|                $metadata['esocialS2299Draft']['eventId'] = $event->getId();
15032|                $member->setSourceMetadata($metadata);
15033|                $this->entityManager->persist($member);
15034|                $this->entityManager->flush();
15035|            }
15036|
15037|            $notificationTitle = 'Revisar desligamento eSocial (S-2299)';
15038|            $notificationMessage = $eventStatus === 'updated'
15039|                ? 'O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi atualizado a partir do offboarding. Abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar os detalhes.'
15040|                : 'O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding. Abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar os detalhes.';
15041|            $notificationMessageHtml = $eventStatus === 'updated'
15042|                ? '<p>O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi atualizado a partir do offboarding.</p>'
15043|                : '<p>O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding.</p>';
15044|            $reviewButtonHtml = '<p style="margin-top:1.25rem;"><a href="' . htmlspecialchars($reviewUrl, ENT_QUOTES, 'UTF-8') . '" style="display:inline-block;background-color:#277591;color:#ffffff;padding:10px 16px;border-radius:6px;font-weight:bold;text-decoration:none;">Revisar desligamento eSocial</a></p>';
15045|
15046|            if ($eventStatus === 'existing_not_editable') {
15047|                $notificationTitle = 'S-2299 oficial já existe e não foi alterado';
15048|                $notificationMessage = 'Já existe um evento S-2299 oficial para {{member_name}} e ele não pode ser editado pelo offboarding. Abra o chat com a Adriana para conferir a situação antes de seguir.';
15049|                $notificationMessageHtml = '<p>Já existe um evento S-2299 oficial para {{member_name}} e ele não pode ser editado pelo offboarding.</p><p>Confira a situação no chat com a Adriana antes de seguir.</p>';
15050|            } elseif (!empty($missing)) {
15051|                $missingLabels = [
15052|                    'esocial_worker_data' => 'dados do trabalhador',
15053|                    'esocial_remuneration_data' => 'dados de remuneração',
15054|                ];
15055|                $missingDescription = implode(' e ', array_map(
15056|                    static fn (string $item): string => $missingLabels[$item] ?? $item,
15057|                    $missing
15058|                ));
15059|
15060|                $notificationTitle = 'Dados eSocial pendentes para gerar S-2299';
15061|                $notificationMessage = 'O S-2299 de {{member_name}} ainda não foi criado porque faltam ' . $missingDescription . '. Complete os dados e abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar.';
15062|                $notificationMessageHtml = '<p>O S-2299 de {{member_name}} ainda não foi criado porque faltam ' . $missingDescription . '.</p><p>Complete os dados e abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar.</p>';
15063|            }
15064|
15065|            $notification = $this->executeNotify([
15066|                'to' => 'company_member',
15067|                'company_member_id' => (string) $responsible->getId(),
15068|                'title' => $notificationTitle,
15069|                'message' => $notificationMessage,
15070|                'message_html' => $notificationMessageHtml . $reviewButtonHtml,
15071|                'system_sender' => true,
15072|            ], $member, array_merge($context, [
15073|                'member_id' => (string) $companyMember->getId(),
15074|                'esocial_s2299_review_url' => $reviewUrl,
15075|            ]));
15076|
15077|            return [
15078|                'success' => true,
15079|                'message' => $event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable'
15080|                    ? 'Rascunho do S-2299 criado/atualizado e responsável notificado'
15081|                    : ($eventStatus === 'existing_not_editable'
15082|                        ? 'Rascunho do S-2299 registrado; já existe evento oficial não editável para este trabalhador'
15083|                        : 'Rascunho do S-2299 registrado; dados eSocial pendentes impedem criar o evento oficial'),
15084|                'offboardingMemberId' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
15085|                'companyMemberId' => $companyMember->getId(),
15086|                'responsibleId' => $responsible->getId(),
15087|                'eventId' => $event?->getId(),
15088|                'eventStatus' => $eventStatus,
15089|                'missing' => $missing,
15090|                'reviewUrl' => $reviewUrl,
15091|                'notification' => $notification,
15092|            ];
15093|        } catch (\Throwable $e) {
15094|            $this->log('error', 'Erro ao criar rascunho S-2299 via offboarding', [
15095|                'error' => $e->getMessage(),
15096|                'memberId' => $member->getId(),
15097|            ]);
15098|
15099|            return ['success' => false, 'error' => $e->getMessage()];
15100|        }
15101|    }
15102|
15103|    private function resolveEsocialS2299Responsible(array $config, FlowInstanceMember $member, \App\Entity\OffboardingMember $offboardingMember): ?CompanyMembers
15104|    {
15105|        $configuredId = $config['responsible_id']
15106|            ?? $config['responsibleId']
15107|            ?? $config['company_member_id']
15108|            ?? $config['member_id']
15109|            ?? null;
15110|
15111|        $flowCompany = $member->getFlowInstance()?->getCompany();
15112|
15113|        if ($configuredId) {
15114|            $responsible = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find((int) $configuredId);
15115|            if (
15116|                $responsible instanceof CompanyMembers
15117|                && $flowCompany instanceof Company
15118|                && $responsible->getCompany()?->getId() === $flowCompany->getId()
15119|            ) {
15120|                return $responsible;
15121|            }
15122|        }
15123|
15124|        $flowResponsible = $member->getFlowInstance()?->getFlowResponsible();
15125|        if ($flowResponsible instanceof CompanyMembers) {
15126|            return $flowResponsible;
15127|        }
15128|
15129|        $offboardingResponsible = $offboardingMember->getOffboarding()?->getOffboardingFlowResponsible();
15130|        if ($offboardingResponsible instanceof CompanyMembers) {
15131|            return $offboardingResponsible;
15132|        }
15133|
15134|        return null;
15135|    }
15136|
15137|    private function buildEsocialS2299DraftPayload(
15138|        \App\Entity\OffboardingMember $offboardingMember,
15139|        CompanyMembers $companyMember,
15140|        CompanyMembers $responsible,
15141|        array $config
15142|    ): array {
15143|        $dismissalDate = $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate();
15144|
15145|        return [
15146|            'member' => $companyMember->getId(),
15147|            'motivoDesligamento' => $config['motivoDesligamento'] ?? $config['mtvDeslig'] ?? '',
15148|            'dataDesligamento' => $dismissalDate ? $dismissalDate->format('Y-m-d') : '',
15149|            'dataConcessaoAviso' => $config['dataConcessaoAviso'] ?? '',
15150|            'avisoPrevioIndenizado' => $config['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ?? '',
15151|            'dataTerminoAviso' => $config['dataTerminoAviso'] ?? '',
15152|            'pensAlim' => $config['pensAlim'] ?? '',
15153|            'percAliment' => $config['percAliment'] ?? '',
15154|            'vrAlim' => $config['vrAlim'] ?? '',
15155|            'numeroProcesso' => $config['numeroProcesso'] ?? '',
15156|            'indPdv' => $config['indPdv'] ?? '',
15157|            'cpfSubstituto' => $config['cpfSubstituto'] ?? '',
15158|            'dataNascimentoTitular' => $config['dataNascimentoTitular'] ?? '',
15159|            'novoCpfTrabalhador' => $config['novoCpfTrabalhador'] ?? '',
15160|            'indRemun' => $config['indRemun'] ?? '',
15161|            'dtFimRemun' => $config['dtFimRemun'] ?? '',
15162|            'matriculaInstituicao' => $config['matriculaInstituicao'] ?? '',
15163|            'numeroContrato' => $config['numeroContrato'] ?? '',
15164|            '_offboarding' => [
15165|                'offboardingMemberId' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
15166|                'offboardingId' => $offboardingMember->getOffboarding()?->getId(),
15167|                'reason' => $offboardingMember->getReason(),
15168|                'responsibleId' => $responsible->getId(),
15169|                'responsibleName' => $responsible->getFullName(),
15170|            ],
15171|        ];
15172|    }
15173|
15174|    private function findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding(
15175|        FlowInstanceMember $member,
15176|        \App\Entity\OffboardingMember $offboardingMember,
15177|        Company $company,
15178|        EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador,
15179|        EsocialDadosRemuneracao $remuneracao
15180|    ): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
15181|    {
15182|        $metadata = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? [];
15183|        if (!is_array($metadata)) {
15184|            return null;
15185|        }
15186|
15187|        $draftMetadata = $metadata['esocialS2299Draft'] ?? null;
15188|        if (
15189|            !is_array($draftMetadata)
15190|            || (int) ($draftMetadata['offboardingMemberId'] ?? 0) !== (int) $offboardingMember->getId()
15191|            || empty($draftMetadata['eventId'])
15192|        ) {
15193|            return null;
15194|        }
15195|
15196|        $event = $this->entityManager
15197|            ->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
15198|            ->find((int) $draftMetadata['eventId']);
15199|
15200|        if (!$event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
15201|            return null;
15202|        }
15203|
15204|        return $this->esocialS2299EventMatchesContext($event, $company, $esocialTrabalhador, $remuneracao, $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate())
15205|            ? $event
15206|            : null;
15207|    }
15208|
15209|    private function findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal(
15210|        Company $company,
15211|        EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador,
15212|        EsocialDadosRemuneracao $remuneracao,
15213|        ?\DateTimeInterface $dismissalDate
15214|    ): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento {
15215|        if (!$dismissalDate instanceof \DateTimeInterface) {
15216|            return null;
15217|        }
15218|
15219|        return $this->entityManager
15220|            ->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
15221|            ->createQueryBuilder('event')
15222|            ->andWhere('event.company = :company')
15223|            ->andWhere('event.esocialTrabalhador = :esocialTrabalhador')
15224|            ->andWhere('event.dadosRemuneracao = :remuneracao')
15225|            ->andWhere('event.dtDeslig = :dismissalDate')
15226|            ->andWhere('event.status != :pendingStatus')
15227|            ->setParameter('company', $company)
15228|            ->setParameter('esocialTrabalhador', $esocialTrabalhador)
15229|            ->setParameter('remuneracao', $remuneracao)
15230|            ->setParameter('dismissalDate', $dismissalDate->format('Y-m-d'))
15231|            ->setParameter('pendingStatus', 'pendente')
15232|            ->orderBy('event.id', 'DESC')
15233|            ->setMaxResults(1)
15234|            ->getQuery()
15235|            ->getOneOrNullResult();
15236|    }
15237|
15238|    private function esocialS2299EventMatchesContext(
15239|        EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $event,
15240|        Company $company,
15241|        EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador,
15242|        EsocialDadosRemuneracao $remuneracao,
15243|        ?\DateTimeInterface $dismissalDate
15244|    ): bool {
15245|        if ($event->getCompany()?->getId() !== $company->getId()) {
15246|            return false;
15247|        }
15248|
15249|        if ($event->getEsocialTrabalhador()?->getId() !== $esocialTrabalhador->getId()) {
15250|            return false;
15251|        }
15252|
15253|        if ($event->getDadosRemuneracao()?->getId() !== $remuneracao->getId()) {
15254|            return false;
15255|        }
15256|
15257|        $eventDismissalDate = $event->getDtDeslig();
15258|        if (!$eventDismissalDate instanceof \DateTimeInterface || !$dismissalDate instanceof \DateTimeInterface) {
15259|            return true;
15260|        }
15261|
15262|        return $eventDismissalDate->format('Y-m-d') === $dismissalDate->format('Y-m-d');
15263|    }
15264|
15265|    private function createEsocialS2299DraftEvent(Company $company, EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador): EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
15266|    {
15267|        $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
15268|        $event->setModo('INC');
15269|        $event->setCompany($company);
15270|        $event->setTpAmb($company->getEsocialMode() ?? '2');
15271|        $event->setTpInscTransmissor(1);
15272|        $event->setNrInscTransmissor($this->onlyDigits((string) $company->getCnpj()));
15273|        $event->setEsocialTrabalhador($esocialTrabalhador);
15274|        $event->setIndRetif(1);
15275|        $event->setStatus('pendente');
15276|        $event->setCreatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
15277|
15278|        return $event;
15279|    }
15280|
15281|    private function applyEsocialS2299Payload(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $event, array $payload, bool $onlyEmptyFields = false): void
15282|    {
15283|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getMtvDeslig(), fn ($value) => $event->setMtvDeslig($value), $this->stringOrNull($payload['motivoDesligamento'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15284|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getDtDeslig(), fn ($value) => $event->setDtDeslig($value), $this->dateOrNull($payload['dataDesligamento'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15285|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getDtAvPrv(), fn ($value) => $event->setDtAvPrv($value), $this->dateOrNull($payload['dataConcessaoAviso'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15286|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getIndPagtoApi(), fn ($value) => $event->setIndPagtoApi($value), $this->booleanStringOrNull($payload['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15287|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getDtProjFimApi(), fn ($value) => $event->setDtProjFimApi($value), $this->dateOrNull($payload['dataTerminoAviso'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15288|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getPensAlim(), fn ($value) => $event->setPensAlim($value), $this->intOrNull($payload['pensAlim'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15289|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getPercAliment(), fn ($value) => $event->setPercAliment($value), $this->decimalOrNull($payload['percAliment'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15290|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getVrAlim(), fn ($value) => $event->setVrAlim($value), $this->decimalOrNull($payload['vrAlim'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15291|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getNrProcTrab(), fn ($value) => $event->setNrProcTrab($value), $this->stringOrNull($payload['numeroProcesso'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15292|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getIndPdv(), fn ($value) => $event->setIndPdv($value), $this->stringOrNull($payload['indPdv'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15293|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getCpfSubstituto(), fn ($value) => $event->setCpfSubstituto($value), $this->cpfOrNull($payload['cpfSubstituto'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15294|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getDtNascto(), fn ($value) => $event->setDtNascto($value), $this->dateOrNull($payload['dataNascimentoTitular'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15295|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getNovoCpf(), fn ($value) => $event->setNovoCpf($value), $this->cpfOrNull($payload['novoCpfTrabalhador'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15296|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getIndRemun(), fn ($value) => $event->setIndRemun($value), $this->intOrNull($payload['indRemun'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15297|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getDtFimRemun(), fn ($value) => $event->setDtFimRemun($value), $this->dateOrNull($payload['dtFimRemun'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15298|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getInsConsig(), fn ($value) => $event->setInsConsig($value), $this->stringOrNull($payload['matriculaInstituicao'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15299|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getNrContr(), fn ($value) => $event->setNrContr($value), $this->stringOrNull($payload['numeroContrato'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15300|    }
15301|
15302|    private function applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(callable $getter, callable $setter, mixed $value, bool $onlyEmptyFields): void
15303|    {
15304|        if ($value === null) {
15305|            return;
15306|        }
15307|
15308|        $currentValue = $getter();
15309|        if ($onlyEmptyFields && $currentValue !== null && $currentValue !== '') {
15310|            return;
15311|        }
15312|
15313|        $setter($value);
15314|    }
15315|
15316|    private function buildEsocialS2299ReviewUrl(CompanyMembers $companyMember): string
15317|    {
15318|        $path = $this->router
15319|            ? $this->router->generate('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => $companyMember->getId()])
15320|            : '/my-company/member/' . $companyMember->getId();
Request #39 deepseek-v4-flash P:69.54K C:1.29K CR:62.72K CW:0 10934ms
Reasoning
I have read most of the code. Now let me examine: **A key issue**: In `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, the notification and return message indicate that the draft has been "criado/atualizado". But consider: When the flow member enters stage 3 (finalization), the automation executes. Then the stage has an automation `stage_change` to advance with all activities completed, etc. But there's also the `create_processo_seletivo` automation seeded on the same stage (Etapa 3 - Finalização) — triggers when offboarding completes. Fine. But notice a real behavioral mismatch in the seeded template: the S-2299 draft is created when the member *enters* the final stage. What if the member enters the final stage, then leaves and re-enters? Idempotency via metadata. Good. **Potential issue: `$eventStatus === 'updated'` means event was found via metadata with status 'pendente' and date matches. But they call applyEsocialS2299Payload with onlyEmptyFields = true. That's confirmed finding #4. **Now new potential issue: `applyEsocialS2299Payload` for `pensAlim` etc. with payload value '' (empty) -> `intOrNull('')` returns null -> skip (doesn't clear). So on 'created' events, if config doesn't set something, it remains null in DB (default). That's fine. **Type mismatch**: In the entity, `pensAlim` is integer. Commit message says "Alterar os tipos de dados dos campos de pensão para string". Entity shows integer for pensAlim. Let me not dig. Not a functional diff issue. Wait — but there might be an inconsistency: `setPercAliment(?string)` and `setVrAlim(?string)` and payload uses decimalOrNull returning a string in format '0.00'. Fine. `setPensAlim(?int)`: intOrNull returns int. Fine. `setIndPagtoApi(?string)`: booleanStringOrNull returns 'S'/'N'. In repository, saveEventS2299 set `'S' : 'N'` regardless. Fine. **Now, a potential bug related to `nrProcTrab`**: The related changed file in other group: `src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php` changed +4/-4 and `templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig` changed; they fixed access when prevEvts termino missing. Not in review files. **Let me examine a concern about notification for 'updated' vs 'created' when missing fields**: If missing non-empty (worker data or remuneration missing), `$event` is null. So the message uses the 'created' variant ("O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado ...") then overwritten by the missing branch text ("ainda não foi criado porque faltam ..."). But then the review button is still appended (message_html = messageHtml + reviewButtonHtml) — the missing branch messageHtml replaced, but still appends reviewButtonHtml link to member manage page for review. OK. Wait there's a subtle bug: for `missing` case they overwrite messageHtml but `$notificationMessageHtml` includes only the missing text. But the `reviewButtonHtml` is appended regardless (line 15070). It's fine. Hmm actually, in the missing-branch, `$notificationMessageHtml = ...` no button appended inside branch; appended later. Good. **Important bug candidate: the message says "foi criado" but when eventStatus = 'draft_only' (missing) but not existing_not_editable, they use 'criado'. Then missing branch overrides text. OK. **Now, a possible problem regarding concurrency/re-entrancy (idempotency)**: automation may run in the same request twice for stage entry. If it runs twice in a row, second run: `findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding` finds event via metadata (eventId stored), matches status pendente -> 'updated' -> onlyEmptyFields... could create event twice? No—find matches. Good. **What about a case where the same event is reachable through a companyMember that got moved to another company? Not likely. **Let's review the trigger of the action**: In YAML config `allowed_triggers: employee_enters_stage`. The action type dispatch switch in AutomationExecutionService is called when the automation executes. But how is the automation mapped to trigger `employee_enters_stage` vs the seeded trigger type 'on_enter'? In the migration's automation rows: trigger_type = 'on_enter'. But the offboarding.yaml action definition says allowed_triggers: employee_enters_stage. The YAML references trigger types in this repo's terminology (maybe 'employee_enters_stage' is the trigger key used for flow automations in offboarding product). The seeded template uses trigger_type 'on_enter'. If the execution engine maps stage entry for offboarding product to trigger key 'employee_enters_stage' vs conditions 'on_enter', we need to check how automations are selected during execution. This is potentially a real mismatch. Let me check what triggers the engine uses when executing automations for offboarding product. Search for 'employee_enters_stage' and 'on_enter' in the codebase. Let me search.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "employee_enters_stage"}
File: config/automations/_global.yaml
Match lines: 1
44|    - id: "employee_enters_stage"

File: config/automations/offboarding.yaml
Match lines: 5
32|    - id: "employee_enters_stage"
188|        - "employee_enters_stage"
218|        - "employee_enters_stage"
257|        - "employee_enters_stage"
293|        - "employee_enters_stage"

File: config/automations/onboarding.yaml
Match lines: 1
14|    - id: "employee_enters_stage"

File: config/automations/pulse_survey.yaml
Match lines: 3
105|    trigger_type: "employee_enters_stage"
146|    trigger_type: "employee_enters_stage"
160|    trigger_type: "employee_enters_stage"

File: config/automations/structural_research.yaml
Match lines: 3
106|    trigger_type: "employee_enters_stage"
147|    trigger_type: "employee_enters_stage"
161|    trigger_type: "employee_enters_stage"

File: config/automations/treinamentos.yaml
Match lines: 1
15|#   movement: employee_enters_stage (on_enter), days_in_stage (on_days_in_stage)

File: src/Controller/DecisionSystem/FlowKanbanController.php
Match lines: 1
6982|                            $onEnterAliases = ['on_enter', 'employee_enters_stage', 'member_enters_stage', 'candidate_enters_stage'];

File: src/EventListener/FlowStageEventListener.php
Match lines: 1
1409|            'on_enter' => ['on_enter', 'member_enters_stage', 'employee_enters_stage', 'candidate_enters_stage', 'nps_on_enter_invite', 'research_group_created'],

File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 3
5354|            'employee_enters_stage' => 'on_enter',
5493|            'employee_enters_stage' => 'on_enter',
5516|            'on_enter' => ['stage_enter', 'member_enter_stage', 'member_enters_stage', 'employee_enters_stage', 'candidate_enters_stage', 'research_group_created'],

File: templates/decision_system/automations/new_automation.html.twig
Match lines: 3
6576|                    'on_enter': 'employee_enters_stage',
8131|        'employee_enters_stage': 'on_enter',
10854|        const hasOnEnter = selectedTriggerTypes.includes('on_enter') || selectedTriggerIds.includes('employee_enters_stage');

File: templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig
Match lines: 1
3851|        'employee_enters_stage':              'colaborador entrar nesta etapa',

File: templates/governance/cases/automations/new_automation.html.twig
Match lines: 3
4365|                    'on_enter': 'employee_enters_stage',
5624|        'employee_enters_stage': 'on_enter',
7947|        const hasOnEnter = selectedTriggerTypes.includes('on_enter') || selectedTriggerIds.includes('employee_enters_stage');

File: tests/Config/FinancialAutomationConfigTest.php
Match lines: 1
125|        $this->assertNotContains('employee_enters_stage', $triggerIds);

code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "on_enter", "file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"]}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 48
3989|                // so stage automations (e.g. on_enter → notify responsible) run.
3991|                    '[TRAINING_APPROVE] Dispatching on_enter | pm=%d | conviteStage=%d(%s) | listener=%s',
4008|                    error_log('[TRAINING_APPROVE] ✅ on_enter dispatched for pm#' . $pm->getId() . ' → stage ' . $conviteStage->getName() . '(ID=' . $conviteStage->getId() . ')');
4010|                    error_log('[TRAINING_APPROVE] ❌ FlowStageEventListener NULL — on_enter NOT dispatched for pm#' . $pm->getId());
4033|            // Dispatching on_enter for the training_group member would trigger participant-level
4035|            // should trigger those automations — their on_enter was already dispatched above.
4617|                    error_log('[REQUEST_DECISION] on_enter after move failed: ' . $e->getMessage());
5353|            'member_enters_stage' => 'on_enter',
5354|            'employee_enters_stage' => 'on_enter',
5355|            'candidate_enters_stage' => 'on_enter',
5356|            'research_group_created' => 'on_enter',
5364|            'payroll_competence_entered_stage' => 'on_enter',
5365|            'esocial_entered_stage' => 'on_enter',
5377|            'on_enter', 'on_exit', 'on_complete', 'on_approved', 'on_rejected', 'condition_advance_on_complete',
5492|            'member_enters_stage' => 'on_enter',
5493|            'employee_enters_stage' => 'on_enter',
5494|            'candidate_enters_stage' => 'on_enter',
5495|            'research_group_created' => 'on_enter',
5502|            'payroll_competence_entered_stage' => 'on_enter',
5503|            'esocial_entered_stage' => 'on_enter',
5516|            'on_enter' => ['stage_enter', 'member_enter_stage', 'member_enters_stage', 'employee_enters_stage', 'candidate_enters_stage', 'research_group_created'],
5519|            // on_enter: ao entrar na etapa (ex.: após avanço por 100% na anterior)
5520|            'on_all_activities_complete' => ['on_all_activities_complete', 'on_enter'],
5568|     * Quando chamado no trigger on_enter sem contexto de progresso, considera satisfeita
6584|            'on_enter' => 'Entrada na etapa',
7593|                // Necessário para disparar automações on_enter da etapa de onboarding
7597|                // O on_enter deve executar no NOVO membro onboarding, não no membro PS congelado.
7685|        // ✅ Retornar flag para indicar que on_enter deve ser disparado pelo caller
9257|        // ✅ Retornar flag para indicar que on_enter deve ser disparado pelo caller
10388|     * - on_enter com tempo configurado: nunca envia na entrada; aguarda scheduler.
10431|        $triggerType = (string) ($context['_trigger_type'] ?? 'on_enter');
10436|        if ($stage && $triggerType === 'on_enter' && $this->stageHasTimeAutomation($stage)) {
11085|     * Após criar cada membro, dispara on_enter para que automações pré-setadas sejam executadas
11256|                // Disparar on_enter para que automações pré-setadas executem.
11260|                        error_log(sprintf('[StartStageProducts] Produto %s: on_enter disparado para stage "%s"', $slug, $firstStage->getName()));
11262|                        error_log(sprintf('[StartStageProducts] Produto %s: FlowStageEventListener indisponível para on_enter', $slug));
11265|                    error_log(sprintf('[StartStageProducts] Produto %s: erro ao disparar on_enter - %s', $slug, $e->getMessage()));
11573|            // Disparar on_enter para a etapa do orquestrador (ex.: "Fase 1 em Andamento")
11577|                    error_log(sprintf('[CycleFlow] Disparando on_enter para etapa do orquestrador "%s" (ID %d)', $firstStage->getName(), $firstStage->getId()));
11581|                error_log(sprintf('[CycleFlow] Erro ao disparar on_enter do orquestrador: %s', $e->getMessage()));
11585|            // start_stage_products configurada na etapa do orquestrador (on_enter).
12180|        $triggerType = $context['_trigger_type'] ?? 'on_enter';
12215|            $type = $type ?? 'on_enter';
12232|            return $normalize($conditions[0]['type'] ?? $automation->getTriggerType() ?? 'on_enter');
12235|        return $normalize($automation->getTriggerType() ?? 'on_enter');
14419|            // Stage-entry trigger (on_enter)
14420|            if ($source === 'on_enter' || str_contains($source, 'stage_enter')) {
14511|                $trigger === 'on_enter'

Request #40 deepseek-v4-flash P:72.91K C:893 CR:70.78K CW:0 7529ms
Reasoning
The trigger 'employee_enters_stage' maps to normalized 'on_enter'. So no mismatch. Now let me look at the automation config load/definition, e.g., how config YAML definitions are validated in tests, and how the new YAML action `create_esocial_s2299_draft` will be used with `has_config: false` and `config_preset`. In yaml new action, they also have config_preset with 'to' key, but has_config false means config editor not shown? Possibly conflicting: presets provide default config. Not issue. Now check the yaml for spelling errors of keys per the checklist: keys appear consistent with siblings above. Let me open the surrounding YAML to see whether sibling actions have the same structure and whether `create_esocial_s2299_draft` includes fields like `triggers` or something else, and if they forgot to add the action to `_global` mapping somewhere (e.g., config/automations/_global.yaml action definitions used by decision_system) — Wait: actions are listed under offboarding product YAML; there may be also an allowlist somewhere else in the front? No. Wait — the automation type to action id maps. But also there may be a mapping of `action_type` labels in the repository `config/automations/offboarding.yaml` actions list at top vs action ids used in `offboarding.yaml` triggers. In the migration they insert `flow_automations.action_type` = 'send_email_flow_responsible', 'stage_change', 'create_processo_seletivo', 'create_esocial_s2299_draft'. Let me confirm these action ids exist in offboarding.yaml as actions. In diff for offboarding.yaml we only see the new action appended near line 179-200. Let me read offboarding.yaml sections around action definitions to see the top-level structure (actions list), and confirm `create_processo_seletivo` and `send_email_flow_responsible` are declared there. And to double check the config definitions include fields. Also check that the seeded migration inserts `conditions`/`actions` JSON as single objects. The seed uses `conditions: [{'type': 'on_enter', ...}]` and `actions: [{'type': 'create_esocial_s2299_draft', 'config': {...}, ...}]`. But it also sets `trigger_type`/`action_type` columns deprecated. When automation is later executed by AutomationExecutionService, how are actions read? They probably read from `actions` array, mapping type to the dispatch key. The dispatch key mapping `'create_esocial_s2299_draft' => ...` added in the switch. Also `conditions` trigger type normalized 'on_enter' — good. Now the seeded action config for `create_esocial_s2299_draft` only includes `to` and `_default_automation_id`. But executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft resolves responsible: config responsible_id? not set; flow responsible via getFlowResponsible; offboarding responsible. OK. Now, more importantly: **stage change automation in Etapa 2** - trigger on_all_activities_complete action stage_change with empty config. Hmm — stage_change action with empty config advances to next stage? Possibly it needs config of target? In YAML offboarding, there's an action 'advance' perhaps... Let me look at the offboarding.yaml action list to see valid action id names ('stage_change'? 'advance_to_next_stage'?). The execution dispatch shows 'advance_rule' => executeAdvanceToNextStage... The YAML earlier in file actions includes 'move_to_next_stage' maybe. Let's read the whole offboarding.yaml to validate the action ids used by the migration ('send_email_flow_responsible', 'stage_change', 'create_processo_seletivo', 'create_esocial_s2299_draft'). Let's read config/automations/offboarding.yaml full.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "config/automations/offboarding.yaml"}
File: config/automations/offboarding.yaml (Total lines: 481)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-481
1|# Configuração de Automações - Offboarding
2|# Este arquivo define triggers, actions e regras específicos para desligamento de colaboradores
3|
4|product:
5|  id: 3
6|  name: "Offboarding"
7|  slug: "offboarding"
8|  entity_name: "Colaborador"
9|  entity_name_plural: "Colaboradores"
10|
11|# Triggers (Condições) disponíveis
12|triggers:
13|  notifications:
14|    - id: "deadline_reached"
15|      type: "on_timeout"
16|      title: "Prazo desta etapa ser atingido"
17|      icon: "fa-solid fa-clock"
18|      has_config: false
19|      
20|    - id: "exit_date"
21|      type: "on_exit_date"
22|      title: "Data de desligamento chegar"
23|      icon: "fa-solid fa-calendar-xmark"
24|      has_config: false
25|
26|    - id: "any_activity_completed"
27|      type: "on_any_activity_complete"
28|      title: "Qualquer atividade da etapa ser concluída"
29|      icon: "fa-solid fa-tasks"
30|      has_config: false
31|
32|    - id: "employee_enters_stage"
33|      type: "on_enter"
34|      title: "Colaborador entrar nesta etapa"
35|      icon: "fa-solid fa-arrow-right-to-bracket"
36|      has_config: false
37|
38|  movement:
39|    - id: "all_activities_completed"
40|      type: "on_all_activities_complete"
41|      title: "Colaborador finalizar X% das atividades da etapa"
42|      icon: "fa-solid fa-check-double"
43|      has_config: true
44|      config_type: "percentage_activities"
45|      config_label: "Porcentagem mínima de atividades concluídas"
46|      config_options:
47|        # Opções geradas dinamicamente no front com base em stageActivitiesCount (25%, 50%, 75%, 100% para 4 atividades, etc.)
48|        dynamic_from_stage: true
49|      
50|    - id: "all_activities_completed_plus_days"
51|      type: "on_all_activities_complete_plus_days"
52|      title: "Colaborador finalizar todas as atividades da etapa e passar X dias"
53|      icon: "fa-solid fa-calendar-check"
54|      has_config: true
55|      config_type: "dropdown"
56|      config_label: "Número de dias após conclusão"
57|      config_options:
58|        - { id: "1", label: "1 dia" }
59|        - { id: "2", label: "2 dias" }
60|        - { id: "3", label: "3 dias" }
61|        - { id: "5", label: "5 dias" }
62|        - { id: "7", label: "7 dias" }
63|        - { id: "14", label: "14 dias" }
64|        - { id: "30", label: "30 dias" }
65|
66|    - id: "offboarding_completed"
67|      type: "on_offboarding_complete"
68|      title: "Colaborador concluir o offboarding (última etapa)"
69|      icon: "fa-solid fa-flag-checkered"
70|      has_config: false
71|
72|    - id: "days_after_offboarding_start"
73|      type: "on_days_after_start"
74|      title: "X dias após o início do offboarding"
75|      icon: "fa-solid fa-calendar-days"
76|      has_config: true
77|      config_type: "dropdown"
78|      config_label: "Número de dias após início"
79|      config_options:
80|        - { id: "1", label: "1 dia" }
81|        - { id: "2", label: "2 dias" }
82|        - { id: "3", label: "3 dias" }
83|        - { id: "5", label: "5 dias" }
84|        - { id: "7", label: "7 dias" }
85|        - { id: "14", label: "14 dias" }
86|        - { id: "30", label: "30 dias" }
87|        - { id: "60", label: "60 dias" }
88|        - { id: "90", label: "90 dias" }
89|
90|    - id: "days_in_stage"
91|      type: "on_days_in_stage"
92|      title: "Colaborador estiver há X dias na mesma etapa"
93|      icon: "fa-solid fa-hourglass-half"
94|      has_config: true
95|      config_type: "dropdown"
96|      config_label: "Número de dias na etapa"
97|      config_options:
98|        - { id: "1", label: "1 dia" }
99|        - { id: "2", label: "2 dias" }
100|        - { id: "3", label: "3 dias" }
101|        - { id: "5", label: "5 dias" }
102|        - { id: "7", label: "7 dias" }
103|        - { id: "14", label: "14 dias" }
104|        - { id: "30", label: "30 dias" }
105|
106|# Actions (Ações) disponíveis
107|actions:
108|  notifications:
109|    # ---------------------------------------------------------
110|    # NOTIFICAÇÕES INTERNAS (Chat/Sistema)
111|    # ---------------------------------------------------------
112|    
113|    # 1. Notificar colaborador
114|    - id: "notify_employee"
115|      type: "notification"
116|      title: "Notificar colaborador"
117|      icon: "fa-solid fa-bell"
118|      has_config: false
119|      config_preset:
120|        to: "employee"
121|    
122|    # 2. Notificar responsável do fluxo
123|    - id: "notify_flow_responsible"
124|      type: "notification"
125|      title: "Notificar responsável do fluxo"
126|      icon: "fa-solid fa-user-check"
127|      has_config: false
128|      config_preset:
129|        to: "flow_responsible"
130|
131|    # 2.1 Notificar preenchimento eSocial (somente se empresa tiver eSocial habilitado)
132|    - id: "notify_esocial_worker_data"
133|      type: "notify_esocial_worker_data"
134|      title: "Notificar preenchimento de dados do trabalhador e remuneração (eSocial)"
135|      icon: "fa-solid fa-id-card-clip"
136|      has_config: false
137|      config_preset:
138|        to: "flow_responsible"
139|    
140|    # ---------------------------------------------------------
141|    # ENVIO DE E-MAILS (SMTP)
142|    # Template determinado automaticamente baseado em: trigger + destinatário
143|    # Ex: offboarding-on_all_activities_complete-employee
144|    # ---------------------------------------------------------
145|    
146|    # 3. Enviar e-mail para colaborador
147|    - id: "send_email_employee"
148|      type: "send_email"
149|      title: "Enviar e-mail para colaborador"
150|      icon: "fa-solid fa-envelope"
151|      has_config: false
152|      config_preset:
153|        to: "employee"
154|    
155|    # 4. Enviar e-mail para responsável do fluxo
156|    - id: "send_email_flow_responsible"
157|      type: "send_email"
158|      title: "Enviar e-mail para responsável do fluxo"
159|      icon: "fa-solid fa-user-gear"
160|      has_config: false
161|      config_preset:
162|        to: "flow_responsible"
163|    
164|    # ---------------------------------------------------------
165|    # NOTIFICAÇÕES ADICIONAIS
166|    # ---------------------------------------------------------
167|    
168|    - id: "send_whatsapp"
169|      type: "send_whatsapp"
170|      title: "Enviar WhatsApp para colaborador"
171|      icon: "fa-brands fa-whatsapp"
172|      has_config: false
173|
174|  movement:
175|    - id: "move_to_next_stage"
176|      type: "stage_change"
177|      title: "Mover para a próxima etapa"
178|      icon: "fa-solid fa-arrow-right"
179|      has_config: false
180|      description: "Move o colaborador para a próxima etapa do offboarding."
181|
182|    - id: "create_esocial_s2299_draft"
183|      type: "create_esocial_s2299_draft"
184|      title: "Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299)"
185|      icon: "fa-solid fa-file-lines"
186|      has_config: false
187|      allowed_triggers:
188|        - "employee_enters_stage"
189|      blocked_triggers:
190|        - "offboarding_completed"
191|        - "exit_date"
192|        - "deadline_reached"
193|        - "all_activities_completed"
194|        - "all_activities_completed_plus_days"
195|        - "any_activity_completed"
196|        - "days_in_stage"
197|        - "days_after_offboarding_start"
198|      blocked_trigger_message: "Esta ação só pode ser usada com o trigger 'Colaborador entrar nesta etapa'"
199|      description: "Cria ou atualiza o rascunho do evento S-2299 com dados do offboarding e notifica o responsável para revisar o desligamento eSocial."
200|      config_preset:
201|        to: "flow_responsible"
202|
203|  # ---------------------------------------------------------
204|  # AÇÕES DE VISIBILIDADE E ACESSO
205|  # ---------------------------------------------------------
206|  
207|  visibility:
208|    # Ação disponível APENAS na primeira etapa (ou Etapa Intermediária em flows variáveis)
209|    # Usada com trigger on_enter
210|    - id: "delay_offboarding_visibility"
211|      type: "delay_offboarding_visibility"
212|      title: "Aguardar X dias para exibir offboarding ao colaborador"
213|      icon: "fa-solid fa-eye-slash"
214|      has_config: true
215|      config_type: "dropdown"
216|      config_label: "Dias para aguardar antes de exibir o offboarding"
217|      allowed_triggers:
218|        - "employee_enters_stage"
219|      blocked_triggers:
220|        - "offboarding_completed"
221|        - "exit_date"
222|        - "deadline_reached"
223|        - "all_activities_completed"
224|        - "all_activities_completed_plus_days"
225|        - "any_activity_completed"
226|        - "days_in_stage"
227|        - "days_after_offboarding_start"
228|      blocked_trigger_message: "Esta ação só pode ser usada com o trigger 'Colaborador entrar nesta etapa'"
229|      first_stage_only: true
230|      description: "Define um período de espera antes de exibir o offboarding na tela do colaborador. O offboarding só será visível após X dias."
231|      config_options:
232|        - { id: "1", label: "1 dia" }
233|        - { id: "2", label: "2 dias" }
234|        - { id: "3", label: "3 dias" }
235|        - { id: "5", label: "5 dias" }
236|        - { id: "7", label: "7 dias" }
237|        - { id: "10", label: "10 dias" }
238|        - { id: "14", label: "14 dias" }
239|        - { id: "21", label: "21 dias" }
240|        - { id: "30", label: "30 dias" }
241|        - { id: "45", label: "45 dias" }
242|        - { id: "60", label: "60 dias" }
243|        - { id: "90", label: "90 dias" }
244|    
245|    # Ação disponível APENAS na última etapa (ou Etapa Final em flows variáveis)
246|    # Usada com trigger on_offboarding_complete
247|    - id: "delay_platform_access_removal"
248|      type: "delay_platform_access_removal"
249|      title: "Permitir acesso à plataforma por X dias após finalizar"
250|      icon: "fa-solid fa-user-clock"
251|      has_config: true
252|      config_type: "dropdown"
253|      config_label: "Dias de acesso à plataforma após conclusão"
254|      allowed_triggers:
255|        - "offboarding_completed"
256|      blocked_triggers:
257|        - "employee_enters_stage"
258|        - "deadline_reached"
259|        - "exit_date"
260|        - "any_activity_completed"
261|        - "all_activities_completed"
262|        - "all_activities_completed_plus_days"
263|        - "days_in_stage"
264|        - "days_after_offboarding_start"
265|      blocked_trigger_message: "Esta ação só pode ser usada com o trigger 'Colaborador concluir o offboarding'"
266|      last_stage_only: true
267|      description: "Após finalizar o offboarding, o colaborador ainda terá acesso à plataforma por X dias. Após esse período, o acesso será removido automaticamente (is_removed = 1)."
268|      config_options:
269|        - { id: "1", label: "1 dia" }
270|        - { id: "2", label: "2 dias" }
271|        - { id: "3", label: "3 dias" }
272|        - { id: "5", label: "5 dias" }
273|        - { id: "7", label: "7 dias" }
274|        - { id: "10", label: "10 dias" }
275|        - { id: "14", label: "14 dias" }
276|        - { id: "21", label: "21 dias" }
277|        - { id: "30", label: "30 dias" }
278|        - { id: "45", label: "45 dias" }
279|        - { id: "60", label: "60 dias" }
280|        - { id: "90", label: "90 dias" }
281|
282|  recruitment:
283|    - id: "create_processo_seletivo"
284|      type: "create_processo_seletivo"
285|      title: "Criar processo seletivo para reposição da vaga"
286|      icon: "fa-solid fa-user-plus"
287|      has_config: true
288|      config_type: "recruitment_config"
289|      config_label: "Configurar processo seletivo"
290|      allowed_triggers:
291|        - "offboarding_completed"
292|      blocked_triggers:
293|        - "employee_enters_stage"
294|        - "deadline_reached"
295|        - "exit_date"
296|        - "any_activity_completed"
297|        - "all_activities_completed"
298|        - "all_activities_completed_plus_days"
299|        - "days_in_stage"
300|        - "days_after_offboarding_start"
301|      blocked_trigger_message: "Esta ação só pode ser usada com o trigger 'Colaborador concluir o offboarding'"
302|      selectable_fields:
303|        - field: "flow_template_id"
304|          type: "flow_template_dropdown"
305|          label: "Máscara/Template do processo seletivo"
306|          required: true
307|          order: 1
308|      config_preset:
309|        copy_cargo: true
310|        copy_department: true
311|        copy_manager_as_responsible: true
312|        create_job: true
313|        job_vacancies: 1
314|        process_status: "active"
315|        process_name_pattern: "Reposição - {cargo} - {department}"
316|
317|# ============================================================================
318|# REGRAS DE AVANÇO
319|# ============================================================================
320|# Divididas em dois tipos:
321|# - fixed: Para etapas FIXAS (com atividades específicas - Etapa 1, 2, 3)
322|# - variable: Para etapas VARIÁVEIS (offboarding inteiro como uma etapa)
323|# ============================================================================
324|
325|advance_rules:
326|  # ============================================================================
327|  # ETAPAS FIXAS (Fixed Steps)
328|  # Baseado nas opções do TypeOfStepAdvance existente
329|  # ============================================================================
330|  
331|  manual:
332|    - id: "manual_advance"
333|      title: "Avanço Manual"
334|      type: "advance"
335|      condition_type: "manual"
336|      operator: "manual"
337|      has_config: false
338|      flow_type: "fixed"
339|      description: "Essa etapa só inicia quando o colaborador é movido manualmente para a próxima etapa."
340|      legacy_mapping:
341|        type_of_step_advance: "Manual"
342|        type_of_step_advance_id: 2
343|
344|  activity_based:
345|    - id: "advance_all_activities_completed"
346|      title: "Automático (todas atividades concluídas)"
347|      type: "advance"
348|      condition_type: "activities_completed"
349|      operator: "all"
350|      has_config: false
351|      flow_type: "fixed"
352|      description: "Inicie essa etapa assim que todas as atividades da etapa anterior forem marcadas como concluídas. Caso esta seja a primeira etapa, ela será automaticamente iniciada assim que os membros forem incluídos no processo."
353|      legacy_mapping:
354|        type_of_step_advance: "Automático"
355|        type_of_step_advance_id: 3
356|
357|  time_based:
358|    - id: "advance_scheduled"
359|      title: "Agendamento"
360|      type: "advance"
361|      condition_type: "scheduled"
362|      operator: "equals"
363|      has_config: true
364|      config_type: "scheduling"
365|      config_label: "Configurar agendamento"
366|      flow_type: "fixed"
367|      description: "Agendar o início da etapa com base em dias, direção e referência de data."
368|      legacy_mapping:
369|        type_of_step_advance: "Agendamento"
370|        type_of_step_advance_id: 1
371|      config_options:
372|        fields:
373|          - name: "daysCount"
374|            label: "Quantidade de dias"
375|            type: "number_input"
376|            min: 0
377|            max: 365
378|            default: 7
379|          - name: "relativeDirection"
380|            label: "Direção"
381|            type: "dropdown"
382|            source: "relativeDirections"
383|          - name: "dateReference"
384|            label: "Referência de data"
385|            type: "dropdown"
386|            source: "dateReferences"
387|
388|  # ============================================================================
389|  # ETAPAS VARIÁVEIS (Variable Steps)
390|  # Para quando um offboarding inteiro é uma etapa intermediária no flow
391|  # ============================================================================
392|
393|  offboarding_status_based:
394|    - id: "advance_offboarding_completed"
395|      title: "Avançar quando offboarding completo"
396|      type: "advance"
397|      condition_type: "offboarding_completed"
398|      operator: "equals"
399|      has_config: false
400|      flow_type: "variable"
401|      description: "Avança automaticamente quando o colaborador concluir todas as etapas do offboarding."
402|      
403|    - id: "advance_offboarding_percentage"
404|      title: "Avançar quando {value}% do offboarding concluído"
405|      type: "advance"
406|      condition_type: "offboarding_percentage"
407|      operator: "greater_than_or_equal"
408|      has_config: true
409|      config_type: "number_input"
410|      config_label: "Porcentagem mínima (%)"
411|      flow_type: "variable"
412|      description: "Avança quando o colaborador completar a porcentagem mínima do offboarding."
413|      config_options:
414|        min: 1
415|        max: 100
416|        step: 5
417|        default: 80
418|        
419|    - id: "advance_offboarding_stage_reached"
420|      title: "Avançar quando colaborador chegar em etapa específica"
421|      type: "advance"
422|      condition_type: "offboarding_stage_reached"
423|      operator: "equals"
424|      has_config: true
425|      config_type: "stage_select"
426|      config_label: "Selecionar etapa"
427|      flow_type: "variable"
428|      description: "Avança quando o colaborador chegar em uma etapa específica do offboarding."
429|      
430|    - id: "block_offboarding_abandoned"
431|      title: "Reprovar se offboarding abandonado"
432|      type: "block"
433|      condition_type: "offboarding_abandoned"
434|      operator: "equals"
435|      has_config: false
436|      flow_type: "variable"
437|      description: "Move para reprovados se o colaborador abandonar o offboarding."
438|
439|  # Regras de tempo para etapas variáveis
440|  variable_time_based:
441|    - id: "advance_days_in_offboarding"
442|      title: "Avançar após {value} dias no offboarding"
443|      type: "advance"
444|      condition_type: "days_in_offboarding"
445|      operator: "equals"
446|      has_config: true
447|      config_type: "number_input"
448|      config_label: "Número de dias"
449|      flow_type: "variable"
450|      description: "Avança automaticamente após o colaborador ficar X dias no offboarding."
451|      config_options:
452|        min: 1
453|        max: 365
454|        default: 30
455|        
456|    - id: "block_timeout_offboarding"
457|      title: "Reprovar após {value} dias sem progresso"
458|      type: "block"
459|      condition_type: "timeout_no_progress"
460|      operator: "equals"
461|      has_config: true
462|      config_type: "number_input"
463|      config_label: "Dias máximos sem progresso"
464|      flow_type: "variable"
465|      description: "Move para reprovados se o colaborador ficar X dias sem avançar no offboarding."
466|      config_options:
467|        min: 1
468|        max: 365
469|        default: 60
470|
471|  # Manual para etapas variáveis
472|  variable_manual:
473|    - id: "manual_advance_variable"
474|      title: "Avanço Manual"
475|      type: "advance"
476|      condition_type: "manual"
477|      operator: "manual"
478|      has_config: false
479|      flow_type: "variable"
480|      description: "Essa etapa só avança quando movida manualmente pelo RH ou gestor."
481|
Request #41 deepseek-v4-flash P:79.53K C:586 CR:73.73K CW:0 6220ms
Reasoning
Looking at the YAML, I notice: 1. The `create_esocial_s2299_draft` action is placed under `movement:` section, whose existing `move_to_next_stage` type is `stage_change`. That means in the automation config UI, `movement` actions are likely treated as stage movement actions with special behaviors (maybe they get their own UI). The new action has type `create_esocial_s2299_draft` (its own), has_config false. 2. In the migration, the seeded automation uses actionType `'stage_change'` for the "Avançar ao concluir 100%" automation. But wait, `actionType` and `triggerType` columns are deprecated; the actual action/condition are in the arrays `conditions` and `actions`. For stage-change automation, they set actions `[{'type': 'stage_change', 'config': [], 'orderIndex': 0}]`. But offboarding.yaml action id is `move_to_next_stage` and type `stage_change`; In flow_automations, `actions` entries' 'type' refers to action id or the type? Let's look at how existing seeded flow automations are created (e.g., in offboarding context elsewhere) to see the pattern. The dispatch switch in AutomationExecutionService at line ~500 is keyed by the execution type; for 'move_to_next_stage'? Let me see how actions are executed - what determines which action runs: `actions` array entries with `type`. And in the dispatch mapping shown at line 503, the keys are like 'advance_rule', 'create_processo_seletivo', etc. Let me look at the action dispatch switch around line 500 and how an automation action's type gets resolved to that switch key. In seeded automation for Etapa 3 finalization "Criar Processo Seletivo ao concluir offboarding", they use action type 'create_processo_seletivo' and the switch has 'create_processo_seletivo'. For stage_change "Avançar ao concluir 100% das atividades" in Etapa 2, they use action type 'stage_change', but the switch around line 503 lists 'advance_rule' => executeAdvanceToNextStage... Let me check lines 480-560 to see mapping. Let me read the dispatch table near line 500.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 620, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 470}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15626)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 470-620
470|            'payroll_notify_flow_responsible', 'esocial_notify_flow_responsible' => $this->executeBpmNotification($config, $member, $context),
471|            'request_notification',
472|            'payroll_request_approval', 'esocial_request_approval' => $this->executeRequestNotification($config, $member, $context),
473|            'send_structural_research_invite' => $this->executeStructuralResearchInviteAction($config, $member, $context),
474|            // NPS com IA: solicitação com aprovação/rejeição via executeRequestNotification (guia REQUEST_NOTIFICATION_IMPLEMENTATION_GUIDE.md)
475|            'nps_action_send_request_notification' => $this->executeRequestNotification(
476|                $this->normalizeCrmStyledRequestNotificationForBpm($config, $member),
477|                $member,
478|                $context
479|            ),
480|            // CRM: na etapa NPS usa o mesmo pipeline; nas etapas CRM mantém envio legado via CrmAutomationService
481|            'crm_action_send_request_notification' => $this->executeCrmOrNpsRequestNotificationAction($config, $member, $context),
482|
483|            // Outros tipos de ação
484|            'send_whatsapp' => $this->executeSendWhatsApp($config, $member, $context),
485|            'move_to_stage',
486|            'payroll_move_to_stage', 'esocial_move_to_stage' => $this->executeMoveToStage($config, $member, $context),
487|            'advance_to_next_stage', 'stage_change', 'move_to_next_stage',
488|            'payroll_move_to_next_stage', 'esocial_move_to_next_stage' => $this->shouldSkipAssessmentStageChange($context)
489|                ? ['executed' => false, 'skipped' => true, 'reason' => 'assessment_already_responded_in_period']
490|                : $this->executeAdvanceToNextStage($config, $member, $context),
491|            'update_status' => $this->executeUpdateStatus($config, $member, $context),
492|            // ✅ Aliases for approve/reject - map to update_status with appropriate status
493|            'approve_candidate', 'approve' => $this->executeUpdateStatus(array_merge($config, ['status' => 'classified']), $member, $context),
494|            'classify_candidate', 'classify' => $this->executeUpdateStatus(array_merge($config, ['status' => 'classified']), $member, $context),
495|            'reject_candidate', 'reject' => $this->executeUpdateStatus(array_merge($config, ['status' => 'rejected']), $member, $context),
496|            'create_task' => $this->executeCreateTask($config, $member, $context),
497|            'schedule_interview' => $this->executeScheduleInterview($config, $member, $context),
498|            'assign_user' => $this->executeAssignUser($config, $member, $context),
499|            'add_tag' => $this->executeAddTag($config, $member, $context),
500|            'webhook' => $this->executeWebhook($config, $member, $context),
501|            'complete_flowable_task' => $this->executeCompleteFlowableTask($config, $member, $context),
502|            // ✅ Advance rule action - treated as advance_to_next_stage
503|            'advance_rule' => $this->executeAdvanceToNextStage($config, $member, $context),
504|            // ✅ Criar Processo Seletivo a partir de offboarding concluído
505|            'create_processo_seletivo' => $this->executeCreateProcessoSeletivo($config, $member, $context),
506|            'create_esocial_s2299_draft' => $this->executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft($config, $member, $context),
507|            
508|            // ✅ Visibilidade e Acesso - Offboarding
509|            'delay_offboarding_visibility' => $this->executeDelayOffboardingVisibility($config, $member, $context),
510|            'delay_platform_access_removal' => $this->executeDelayPlatformAccessRemoval($config, $member, $context),
511|
512|            // ✅ PDI: Atribuir responsável à meta
513|            'assign_responsible', 'assign_goal_responsible' => $this->executeAssignGoalResponsible($config, $member, $context),
514|            
515|            // ✅ PDI: Movimentar sem solicitação (mesmo destino que Enviar solicitação, executa direto)
516|            'direct_movement',
517|            'assign_to_other_bpmn_flow_direct' => $this->executeDirectMovement($config, $member, $context),
518|
519|            // ✅ Ciclos: iniciar todos os produtos associados à etapa do orquestrador
520|            'start_stage_products' => $this->executeStartStageProducts($config, $member, $context),
521|            'payroll_generate_monthly_sheet' => $this->executePayrollGenerateMonthlySheet($config, $member, $context, 'monthly'),
522|            'payroll_generate_weekly_sheet' => $this->executePayrollGenerateMonthlySheet($config, $member, $context, 'weekly'),
523|            'payroll_generate_biweekly_sheet' => $this->executePayrollGenerateMonthlySheet($config, $member, $context, 'biweekly'),
524|            'financial_flow_action' => $this->executeFinancialFlowAction($config, $member, $context),
525|            'esocial_validate_payroll_events' => $this->executeEsocialValidatePayrollEvents($config, $member, $context),
526|            'esocial_send_payroll_events' => $this->executeEsocialSendPayrollEvents($config, $member, $context),
527|            'esocial_check_payroll_response' => $this->executeEsocialCheckPayrollResponse($config, $member, $context),
528|            // ✅ Jornada Metahuman: clona um novo ciclo ao entrar em Análise Jornada
529|            'jornada_clone_cycle' => $this->executeJornadaCloneCycle($config, $member, $context),
530|
531|            // NPS Convite: notificações — default plain e-mail (evita slug auto inexistente no banco)
532|            'nps_action_notify_owner' => $this->executeNotify($this->mergeNpsNotifyRecipientConfig('record_owner', $config, $context), $member, $context),
533|            'nps_action_notify_admin' => $this->executeNotify($this->mergeNpsNotifyRecipientConfig('administrators', $config, $context), $member, $context),
534|
535|            // NPS Convite: envia convite da pesquisa para o contato do registro CRM no fluxo
536|            'nps_action_send_invite' => $this->executeNpsSendInvite($config, $member, $context),
537|            'nps_action_move_to_evaluation' => $this->executeNpsKanbanMove(NpsBpmnService::STAGE_AVALIACAO, $config, $member, $context),
538|            'nps_action_move_to_not_authorized' => $this->executeNpsKanbanMove(NpsBpmnService::STAGE_NAO_AUTORIZADO, $config, $member, $context),
539|            // NPS Avaliação: após X tempo, notificar follow-up de oportunidade (CRM) + opcional solicitação de novo registro
540|            'nps_action_evaluation_contact_followup' => $this->executeNpsEvaluationContactFollowup($config, $member, $context),
541|
542|            default => ['executed' => false, 'message' => 'Tipo de ação desconhecido: ' . $type]
543|        };
544|    }
545|
546|    /**
547|     * @param array<string, mixed> $config
548|     * @param array<string, mixed> $context
549|     *
550|     * @return array<string, mixed>
551|     */
552|    private function executeFinancialFlowAction(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member = null, array $context = []): array
553|    {
554|        if (!$this->financialFlowAutomationExecutor instanceof FinancialFlowAutomationExecutor) {
555|            return [
556|                'executed' => false,
557|                'success' => false,
558|                'message' => 'Executor de automações financeiras indisponível.',
559|            ];
560|        }
561|
562|        $result = $this->financialFlowAutomationExecutor->executeFinancialFlowAction($config, $member, $context);
563|
564|        return array_merge([
565|            'executed' => true,
566|        ], $result);
567|    }
568|
569|    private function executeEsocialValidatePayrollEvents(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member = null, array $context = []): array
570|    {
571|        if (!$member instanceof FlowInstanceMember || !$member->getFlowInstance() instanceof FlowInstance) {
572|            return ['executed' => false, 'success' => false, 'message' => 'Automação eSocial sem instância de folha vinculada.'];
573|        }
574|
575|        $flowInstance = $member->getFlowInstance();
576|        $company = $flowInstance->getCompany();
577|        if (!$company instanceof Company) {
578|            return ['executed' => false, 'success' => false, 'message' => 'Empresa da instância não encontrada.'];
579|        }
580|
581|        $competence = $this->resolvePayrollCompetenceFromFlow($flowInstance, $member);
582|        if ($competence === null) {
583|            $notification = $this->notifyEsocialResponsible(
584|                $member,
585|                $context,
586|                'Competência eSocial não encontrada',
587|                'Não foi possível identificar a competência da folha nesta instância. Revise os dados da competência antes de validar o eSocial.',
588|                'erro'
589|            );
590|
591|            return [
592|                'executed' => false,
593|                'success' => false,
594|                'message' => 'Competência da folha não encontrada na instância do orquestrador.',
595|                'notification' => $notification,
596|            ];
597|        }
598|
599|        [$year, $month, $paymentDate] = $competence;
600|        $payrolls = $this->findPayrollsForEsocialValidation($company, $year, $month, $paymentDate);
601|        $validation = $this->buildPayrollEsocialAutomationValidation($company, $payrolls, $year, $month, $paymentDate, false);
602|
603|        $metadata = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? [];
604|        if (!is_array($metadata)) {
605|            $metadata = [];
606|        }
607|        $metadata['esocialValidation'] = $validation;
608|        $metadata['esocialValidationCheckedAt'] = (new \DateTimeImmutable())->format('c');
609|        $member->setSourceMetadata($metadata);
610|
611|        $flowConfig = $flowInstance->getConfig() ?? [];
612|        if (!is_array($flowConfig)) {
613|            $flowConfig = [];
614|        }
615|        $flowConfig['esocialValidation'] = $validation;
616|        $flowConfig['esocialValidationCheckedAt'] = (new \DateTimeImmutable())->format('c');
617|        $flowInstance->setConfig($flowConfig);
618|
619|        $this->entityManager->persist($member);
620|        $this->entityManager->persist($flowInstance);
Request #42 deepseek-v4-flash P:82.9K C:2.03K CR:80K CW:0 16024ms
Reasoning
OK. The dispatch switch now handles 'create_esocial_s2299_draft'. All good. Now, look more carefully at the metadata second-flush ordering relative to the event flush. Note that when eventStatus is 'existing_not_editable', the event's ID exists before first flush, so eventId set correctly in first flush. When 'created', event ID is null before first flush (eventId null stored), then after flush they update metadata with eventId. OK. But wait, there's a subtle problem in the metadata persistence when the event is created: the first flush happens at line 15027 which flushes pending event + member metadata. Then second flush. Fine. Now potential **bug in `resolveEsocialS2299Responsible`** and use of `$config['company_member_id']` — note the executeNotify config uses `company_member_id` for recipient resolution (responsible). But in `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, executeNotify is passed `company_member_id` = responsible id. Fine. But notice: `resolveEsocialS2299Responsible` reads config keys `responsible_id`, `responsibleId`, `company_member_id`, `member_id`. When called from automation context, `$config` is automation's action config (contains `to` and `_default_automation_id`). Since has_config false, no responsible_id etc. So it falls to flowResponsible. In the notification path, recipient is resolved to responsible's user. But is flow responsible's user guaranteed to exist? If flowResponsible is a CompanyMembers with user null, resolveRecipients won't find a user, so no notification. Minor edge case, not reportable. Now let me check the deeper **flaw in `executeNotify` when 'to' => 'company_member' with member being offboarding flow member**: In `resolveRecipients`, `company_member` uses context company_member_id directly. Good. So notification will go to responsible's user. **Now — I need to figure out whether the notification button URL `my_company_member_manage?esocialTab=desligamento` is actually accessible to the responsible.** The responsible is flow responsible; but the review URL is the dismissed employee's member page. Flow responsible usually has permission. But not always; and the member page might require ROLE_... But this is more of a product decision; not worth. Actually wait: The PR description says "O botão 'ver detalhes' direciona para o chat com a Adriana". In-app notification buttonUrl '/chat?adriana=1'. And chat message has no link. But the email message_html includes reviewButtonHtml with the review URL — a direct deep link to the member page. This seems fine. Now let me examine the 'created' path more carefully for the required fields on event: new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento gets: modo, company, tpAmb, tpInscTransmissor, nrInscTransmissor, esocialTrabalhador, indRetif, status, createdAt, dadosRemuneracao, plus mtvDeslig/dtDeslig etc. via payload. That seems comparable to saveEventS2299. One difference: saveEventS2299 sets `$event->setIndRetif(1)` and uses `$data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N'` — here booleanStringOrNull yields null when config missing. Fine. **Now the deeper issue: the mtvDeslig requirement.** In the S-2299 official flow, motivo desligamento is required. Draft created with null mtvDeslig is fine for draft. **Now, a potential problem: The automation executes when the member enters the final stage (Etapa 3) — creating the draft with the dismissal date. But if the employee later moves back to Etapa 2 or if the dismissal date changed, the draft isn't updated (only-empty-fields update). Confirmed #4. Let's now look for issues not yet flagged: **Issue candidate A: `$config['system_sender']` addition to `$emailConfig` in executeNotify** — wait, that code at 7044 is in executeNotify? Let me confirm which method: lines 6985-7082 are in `executeNotify`. Yes the diff was inside executeNotify. **Issue candidate B: In executeNotify, `recipientType` from executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft is `'company_member'`; `$recipientContext` merges config. config contains 'system_sender' => true, and the context merged adds 'member_id'. So 'company_member' resolution uses company_member_id from config directly. Good. **Issue candidate C: Notice executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft calls `executeNotify` (not `sendChatNotification` directly) with only title/message/message_html; no template. That means it'll ALSO send an actual email (executeSendEmail) with emailTemplateBody html to responsible with a button. In the email config the `system_sender` is passed; when `executeSendEmail` sends chat it will send from Adriana. Also `executeSendEmail` might attempt to send email to the user's email address... wait, in executeNotify the `'to' => $user->getEmail()` for emails. So it sends an actual email with subject "Revisar desligamento eSocial (S-2299)" and body html with member manage link. This seems intended per PR? Actually PR says only notification/chat. Emails might be an unintended extra but probably acceptable (system notifications email). Actually wait — in executeNotify's email send they call executeSendEmail($emailConfig, ...) where `to` = user email. executeSendEmail would then likely send email AND also chat message. With system_sender true, the chat message goes to assistant conversation as Adriana. In-app notification has buttonUrl '/chat?adriana=1'. That's consistent. Now if chat messages are already being handled via executeSendEmail (they always send chat), then why include system_sender only for Adriana conversation? Because chat sent via executeSendEmail may default to a "manager" conversation; with system_sender, they use the Adriana assistant conversation. Makes sense. **Issue candidate D: `htmlspecialchars` review button and message text.** The message_html includes `{{member_name}}` placeholder replaced via replaceVariables in executeNotify. But wait, executeNotify does replaceVariables on messageHtml. Let me confirm `replaceVariables` supports `{{member_name}}`. Search for 'member_name' in replaceVariables. But more critical: **`$notificationMessageHtml . $reviewButtonHtml`** — the message_html is only constructed when NOT existing_not_editable and NOT missing. For `existing_not_editable` case, notificationMessageHtml replaced but reviewButton still appended - Actually reviewButtonHtml is always appended at line 15070 regardless. Wait, for existing_not_editable they'd append the button too, saying "Revisar desligamento eSocial" linking to member manage page. That's fine; still useful. **Issue candidate E — `missing` is only populated with the FIRST missing item?** No, they add 'esocial_worker_data' if no trabalhador; else if no remuneration add 'esocial_remuneration_data'. Only one of these can be present per run because if worker missing, skip else branch. So missing array always has 1 element. implode handles. Fine. **Issue candidate F**: When `esocialTrabalhador` found but no `remuneracao` — the event not created; but the draft metadata stores 'payload' with dismissal data; notification instructs to fill remuneration data. When the responsible later fills the remuneration data in the eSocial tab, no automatic re-run unless the automation triggers again on stage re-entry. Not a code bug per se. **Issue candidate G**: `$member->getSourceMetadata()` for a FlowInstanceMember offboarding is used to store the draft, but is this metadata column ever cleared? Not relevant. **Issue candidate H — Very important**: The `findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding` uses `$draftMetadata['offboardingMemberId']` to match; `$metadata['esocialS2299Draft']` stored with `eventId` null when no event was created (missing data). On next run, when data now complete, `empty($draftMetadata['eventId'])` => returns null, then `findExisting...` excludes pendente, then creates new event. Good. **Issue candidate I**: Race conditions: two concurrent executions could both create a new event (both see none) => duplicate draft. Not handled, but typical. Not necessarily report. **Issue candidate J — Potential NULL getter crash**: `$offboardingMember->getDismissalDate()` — need to verify OffboardingMember has that getter and Offboarding has getOffboardingFlowResponsible and getReason. Let me check OffboardingMember entity methods. It may not have a `getDismissalDate` method, in which case code fatals! Let me check. Let me find OffboardingMember entity.
Tool Calls (2)
file_find
Show Details
{"query_name": "OffboardingMember.php"}
src/Entity/OffboardingMember.php
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "function getDismissalDate"}
File: src/Entity/OffboardingMember.php
Match lines: 1
380|    public function getDismissalDate(): ?\DateTimeInterface

Request #43 deepseek-v4-flash P:85K C:187 CR:84.86K CW:0 2454ms
Reasoning
Let me read OffboardingMember around lines 300-420 to find getReason, getCompanyMember, getOffboarding, and getDismissalDate and also find getOffboardingFlowResponsible in Offboarding entity. Also check getOffboarding() returns Offboarding entity with method getOffboardingFlowResponsible.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 400, "file_path": "src/Entity/OffboardingMember.php", "start_line": 300}
File: src/Entity/OffboardingMember.php (Total lines: 730)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 300-400
300|        return $this;
301|    }
302|
303|    public function getVisibleAt(): ?\DateTimeInterface
304|    {
305|        return $this->visibleAt;
306|    }
307|
308|    public function setVisibleAt(?\DateTimeInterface $visibleAt): self
309|    {
310|        $this->visibleAt = $visibleAt;
311|        return $this;
312|    }
313|
314|    public function getAccessRemovalScheduledAt(): ?\DateTimeInterface
315|    {
316|        return $this->accessRemovalScheduledAt;
317|    }
318|
319|    public function setAccessRemovalScheduledAt(?\DateTimeInterface $accessRemovalScheduledAt): self
320|    {
321|        $this->accessRemovalScheduledAt = $accessRemovalScheduledAt;
322|        return $this;
323|    }
324|
325|    public function getRejectionReason(): ?string
326|    {
327|        return $this->rejectionReason;
328|    }
329|
330|    public function setRejectionReason(?string $rejectionReason): self
331|    {
332|        $this->rejectionReason = $rejectionReason;
333|        return $this;
334|    }
335|
336|    public function getLetterSent(): ?bool
337|    {
338|        return $this->letterSent;
339|    }
340|
341|    public function setLetterSent(bool $letterSent): self
342|    {
343|        $this->letterSent = $letterSent;
344|        return $this;
345|    }
346|
347|    public function getLetterLink(): ?string
348|    {
349|        return $this->letterLink;
350|    }
351|
352|    public function setLetterLink(?string $letterLink): self
353|    {
354|        $this->letterLink = $letterLink;
355|        return $this;
356|    }
357|
358|    public function getCreatedAt(): ?\DateTimeInterface
359|    {
360|        return $this->createdAt;
361|    }
362|
363|    public function setCreatedAt(\DateTimeInterface $createdAt): self
364|    {
365|        $this->createdAt = $createdAt;
366|        return $this;
367|    }
368|
369|    public function getUpdatedAt(): ?\DateTimeInterface
370|    {
371|        return $this->updatedAt;
372|    }
373|
374|    public function setUpdatedAt(?\DateTimeInterface $updatedAt): self
375|    {
376|        $this->updatedAt = $updatedAt;
377|        return $this;
378|    }
379|
380|    public function getDismissalDate(): ?\DateTimeInterface
381|    {
382|        return $this->dismissalDate;
383|    }
384|
385|    public function setDismissalDate(?\DateTimeInterface $dismissalDate): self
386|    {
387|        $this->dismissalDate = $dismissalDate;
388|        return $this;
389|    }
390|
391|    public function getCurrentStep(): ?OffboardingStep
392|    {
393|        return $this->currentStep;
394|    }
395|
396|    public function setCurrentStep(?OffboardingStep $currentStep): self
397|    {
398|        $this->currentStep = $currentStep;
399|        return $this;
400|    }
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "function getOffboardingFlowResponsible"}
File: src/Entity/Offboarding.php
Match lines: 1
217|    public function getOffboardingFlowResponsible(): ?CompanyMembers

Request #44 deepseek-v4-flash P:86.04K C:419 CR:85.12K CW:0 3754ms
Reasoning
Those exist. Now, is `$companyMember->getFullName()` existing? Let me confirm CompanyMembers has getFullName. Also `getEsocialMode` on Company. And `EsocialDadosTrabalhador` import. Check import list in AutomationExecutionService (top). Let me read top import lines around use statements to confirm EsocialDadosTrabalhador, EsocialDadosRemuneracao, CompanyMembers, Company already imported. We saw `use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;` added at diff (line 40). EsocialDadosTrabalhador/EsocialDadosRemuneracao/CompanyMembers/Company presumably imported already (given code at line 572 uses Company directly, at 13034 uses User). Let me confirm EsocialDadosRemuneracao imported. Actually, since EsocialDadosTrabalhador is used at line 14965 without namespace and class name in file likely imported. Let me grep imports.
Tool Calls (3)
code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "use App\\Entity\\EsocialDados"}
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Entity/CompanyMembers.php"], "search_text": "function getFullName"}
File: src/Entity/CompanyMembers.php
Match lines: 1
278|    public function getFullName(): ?string

code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "use App\\Entity\\CompanyMembers"}
Error: fatal: Couldn't JIT the PCRE2 pattern '\Quse App\Entity\CompanyMembers\E', got '-48'
Request #45 deepseek-v4-flash P:86.55K C:234 CR:86.4K CW:0 2605ms
Reasoning
Search for imports with simpler text to avoid regex issue. Search exact 'CompanyMembers;' etc.
Tool Calls (3)
code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "EsocialDadosTrabalhador;"}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 1
32|use App\Entity\EsocialDadosTrabalhador;

code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "use App\\Entity\\Company;"}
Error: fatal: Couldn't JIT the PCRE2 pattern '\Quse App\Entity\Company;\E', got '-48'
code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class"}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 2
1781|        $remuneracaoRepo = $this->entityManager->getRepository(EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class);
14977|                    ->getRepository(EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class)

Request #46 deepseek-v4-flash P:86.94K C:809 CR:86.78K CW:0 7000ms
Reasoning
OK, all used classes seem imported. Good. Now let's check the AutomationExecutionService used `EsocialDadosRemuneracao::findByTrabalhador` signature — used at line 1781 too, so existing method. Fine. Now, since the automation (create_esocial_s2299_draft) is executed as part of the standard automation execution flow — how does it get called? By action type in the `executeAutomation` switch keyed `$type`. In the seeded automation for stage 3, actions array contains `{'type': 'create_esocial_s2299_draft', ...}`. But wait — for other automations in the codebase (e.g. seeded via YAML config on a real flow created via "Novo Flow"), what's the shape of actions? Let's check how the code iterates an automation's `actions` and resolves the action's `type` (the key in the dispatch switch). It likely uses action['type']. We already see in the dispatch switch aliases like 'stage_change' as a key. And in the seeded stage-2 automation actions = [{'type': 'stage_change', 'config': []}], matching the switch key 'stage_change'. Good. Now — there's a subtle but real mismatch: In the seeded automations, they set both `trigger_type` (deprecated) and `conditions`. In YAML for 'send_email_flow_responsible', the 'type' is `send_email`, not the id. But the seeded `action_type` is the ID 'send_email_flow_responsible' which is an alias key in the switch? Let's check switch keys: line ~? 'send_email_flow_responsible' presumably exists. Search 'send_email_flow_responsible' in dispatch. Actually the seeded automation "Notificar responsável do fluxo" actionType 'send_email_flow_responsible' appears in YAML actions `notifications` list (id 'send_email_flow_responsible', type send_email). In dispatch table, the actual executed type used is action['type']. Since seeded actions array has 'type' => 'send_email'? Wait the migration seed sets: - For stage 1 automation: actionType = 'send_email_flow_responsible', actions = [['type' => 'send_email', 'config' => [...]]]. - Hmm actions[]['type'] = 'send_email'! And dispatch for 'send_email'? Let me look for 'send_email' in switch. Earlier at line 470 area we saw keys like 'notify_*'. Let me find the 'send_email' keys. Actually 'send_email' probably maps to executeSendEmail. Search dispatch mapping. Also for 'create_processo_seletivo' the actions[]['type'] = 'create_processo_seletivo' consistent. For 'create_esocial_s2299_draft', actions[]['type'] = 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' consistent with new dispatch key. But for stage-change: actions[]['type'] = 'stage_change' consistent. For stage 1's first automation "Notificar responsável do fluxo": actions[]['type'] = 'send_email'; That's keyed by type not id; dispatch must have 'send_email'. Let me verify dispatch mapping key 'send_email' exists. Let me search 'executeSendEmail' in the switch at the top.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 470, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 380}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15626)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 380-470
380|                        'action' => 'implicit_advance_to_next_stage',
381|                        'success' => false,
382|                        'error' => $e->getMessage()
383|                    ];
384|                }
385|            }
386|            
387|            if ($isRejectRule && !$didReject) {
388|                error_log("[IMPLICIT_REJECT] 🔔 Reject rule '{$automation->getName()}' (ID:{$automation->getId()}) didn't explicitly reject - executing implicit reject");
389|                try {
390|                    $rejectResult = $this->executeUpdateStatus(['status' => 'rejected'], $member, $context);
391|                    $results[] = [
392|                        'action' => 'implicit_reject',
393|                        'success' => true,
394|                        'result' => $rejectResult
395|                    ];
396|                    error_log("[IMPLICIT_REJECT] ✅ Result: " . json_encode($rejectResult));
397|                } catch (\Exception $e) {
398|                    error_log("[IMPLICIT_REJECT] ❌ Error: {$e->getMessage()}");
399|                    $results[] = [
400|                        'action' => 'implicit_reject',
401|                        'success' => false,
402|                        'error' => $e->getMessage()
403|                    ];
404|                }
405|            }
406|        }
407|        
408|        // Registrar execução
409|        $this->recordExecution($automation, $member, $results);
410|        
411|        return $results;
412|    }
413|
414|    /**
415|     * Executa uma ação individual
416|     */
417|    public function executeAction(array $action, ?FlowInstanceMember $member = null, array $context = []): array
418|    {
419|        $type = $action['type'] ?? '';
420|        $config = $action['config'] ?? [];
421|        
422|        // Log para debug
423|        error_log("[DEBUG] executeAction - type: {$type}, config: " . json_encode($config));
424|
425|        // Metadado aditivo: permite que handlers compartilhados (ex.: executeMoveToStage)
426|        // saibam o tipo de ação de origem sem alterar o comportamento existente.
427|        $context['_action_type'] = (string) $type;
428|        
429|        return match ($type) {
430|            // Tipos básicos de email
431|            'send_email' => $this->executeSendEmail($config, $member, $context),
432|            'email' => $this->executeSendEmail($config, $member, $context),
433|            
434|            // Tipos específicos de notificação por destinatário (IDs do YAML)
435|            'send_email_candidate' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'candidate'], $config), $member, $context),
436|            'send_email_interviewer' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'interviewer'], $config), $member, $context),
437|            'send_email_monitored_evaluator' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'monitored_evaluator'], $config), $member, $context),
438|            'send_email_employee' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'employee'], $config), $member, $context),
439|            'send_email_flow_responsible' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'flow_responsible'], $config), $member, $context),
440|            
441|            // ✅ RE-ENABLED: Needed for fixed stage automations (approved/rejected/classified)
442|            'send_email_responsible' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'responsible'], $config), $member, $context),
443|            'send_email_manager' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'manager'], $config), $member, $context),
444|            'send_email_company_member' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'company_member'], $config), $member, $context),
445|            'send_email_role' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'role'], $config), $member, $context),
446|            
447|            // PDI email types
448|            'send_email_member' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'member'], $config), $member, $context),
449|            'send_email_direct_manager' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'direct_manager'], $config), $member, $context),
450|            'send_email_goal_responsible' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'goal_responsible'], $config), $member, $context),
451|            // PDI alert types (same as email but with alert tone)
452|            'send_alert' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['notification_type' => 'alert'], $config), $member, $context),
453|            'send_alert_member' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'member', 'notification_type' => 'alert'], $config), $member, $context),
454|            'send_alert_direct_manager' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'direct_manager', 'notification_type' => 'alert'], $config), $member, $context),
455|            'send_alert_goal_responsible' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'goal_responsible', 'notification_type' => 'alert'], $config), $member, $context),
456|            'notify_employee' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'employee'], $config), $member, $context),
457|            'notify_responsible' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'responsible'], $config), $member, $context),
458|            'notify_flow_responsible' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'flow_responsible'], $config), $member, $context),
459|            'notify_esocial_worker_data' => $this->executeNotifyEsocialWorkerData($config, $member, $context),
460|            'notify_manager' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'manager'], $config), $member, $context),
461|            'notify_administrators' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'administrators'], $config), $member, $context),
462|            // Training-specific notify actions (YAML id used as type by the UI)
463|            'notify_training_responsible' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'training_group_responsible'], $config), $member, $context),
464|            'notify_participant' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'member'], $config), $member, $context),
465|            // CRM notify actions (yaml types and legacy ids)
466|            'crm_action_notify_owner', 'crm_notify_record_owner' => $this->executeNotify($this->buildCrmNotifyConfig('record_owner', $config, $context), $member, $context),
467|            'crm_action_notify_board', 'crm_notify_board_owner' => $this->executeNotify($this->buildCrmNotifyConfig('board_owner', $config, $context), $member, $context),
468|            'notify', 'notification', 'send_notification' => $this->executeNotify($config, $member, $context),
469|            'bpm_notification', 'send_bpm_notification',
470|            'payroll_notify_flow_responsible', 'esocial_notify_flow_responsible' => $this->executeBpmNotification($config, $member, $context),
Request #47 deepseek-v4-flash P:89.62K C:6.42K CR:87.68K CW:0 48458ms
Reasoning
OK, action dispatch is via action['type']. The seeded automations are consistent: 'send_email' for stage 1 notify, 'stage_change', 'create_processo_seletivo', 'create_esocial_s2299_draft'. Now let's examine the seeded template's semantics more carefully: Etapa 3 - Finalização automations: 1. "Criar Processo Seletivo ao concluir offboarding" - trigger on_offboarding_complete, action create_processo_seletivo with empty config. **But create_processo_seletivo in YAML requires config (flow_template_id) — has_config true, selectable_fields flow_template_id required**. Executing with empty config will likely fail or create nonsense. But this automation is part of the seed. Interesting: the flow is "Offboarding com eSocial (S-2299)". When the employee concludes offboarding, it will create a processo seletivo (recruitment process). This is the default behavior from a template; user can edit. That automation with empty config could fail when the offboarding completes. Hmm — but is this within the diff (migration seeding it)? Yes, and it would mislead. But maybe createProcessoSeletivo with empty config does something sensible? Let's not dig too deep; it might be intentional default flow (create a process to replace employee). Actually with empty config, `executeCreateProcessoSeletivo` would likely use defaults. That is a default behavior of the offboarding product; preexisting in the platform flow seeds perhaps. Not necessarily introduced bug; it's the template config. 2. "Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299) ao entrar na etapa final" - on_enter. Also, note the description in the YAML: blocked trigger says only employee_enters_stage allowed. In the seed, they used on_enter. Consistent. Now, look at Etapa 2 - Transição's automation: "Avançar ao concluir 100% das atividades" uses conditions type 'on_all_activities_complete' config value 100 and actions stage_change. In YAML the trigger id is 'all_activities_completed' with type 'on_all_activities_complete'. Consistent. Etapa 1 - Preparação's automation: "Notificar responsável do fluxo" uses on_enter -> send_email type 'send_email'. Consistent. Now — think about the migration seeding across the whole platform: This template is created per company with 'fluxo-de-saida' workflow, and it's placed at workflow level (workflow_products + flow_template). But there's a catch: For flows, do they model offboarding as a fixed product with stages? The template seed creates stages: stage 1, 2, 3 with product offboarding and flow_activities named 'Offboarding'. Hmm — the 'activity' 'Offboarding' per stage... For offboarding product flows, each stage has "Offboarding" activity as a configurable... wait, offboarding product isn't a normal task activity flow; the flow stages represent the offboarding steps the employee goes through, and each stage member is a FlowInstanceMember with sourceType offboarding. The member enters stage, and the automation triggers. Hmm, but is the "template" concept in this system used to instantiate actual flow runs ("instances") for offboarding product? The product offboarding uses flows like "Fluxos de Saída". Creating the template adds a new "template" under the workflow that can be chosen when creating an offboarding flow instance? The 'flow_templates' with products and stages — likely the flow created from template materializes stages and automations. Potential concern: the migration seeds this template into the SAME workflow 'fluxo-de-saida' per company, as a second template. This is like a default flow template that users can pick. The risk of interfering with existing offboarding flows seems low. Anyway, previously confirmed findings cover: 1. Migration doesn't check per-company module enablement. 2. Duplicate field mapping (god object). 3. Existing pendente draft created outside automation ignored -> duplicates. 4. OnlyEmptyFields update on re-execution -> stale data. 5. Missing tests. Let me find NEW distinct issues worth reporting: **New Issue 1: Migration applies `ensureWorkflowProduct` order_index 0 overwriting existing offboarding product ordering for existing workflows.** In `up()`: ```php $workflowProductExisted = $this->workflowProductExists($workflowId, $offboardingProductId); $this->ensureWorkflowProduct($workflowId, $offboardingProductId, 0); ``` ensureWorkflowProduct: if exists, updates order_index = 0. So for an existing workflow where offboarding product is ordered after other products (e.g., after onboarding/PS), this migration sets its order_index to 0 — placing offboarding as the first product in the workflow's kanban columns ordering, thereby changing product ordering in existing "Fluxos de Saída". Hmm, but 'fluxo-de-saida' workflow likely is offboarding-specific so only one product. Not certain; but the update of order_index is suspicious — no need to force 0 if it already exists. Still, is 'fluxo-de-saida' with other products plausible? Flowable 'fluxo-de-saida' may hold offboarding and 'exame demissional' products, etc. The ordering matters: it modifies existing configuration for the whole company based on the seed migration. The template creation itself should not need to reorder the existing workflow_products. The intent: to add the offboarding product if it's missing (so the template can attach). Setting order_index=0 for an existing record overwrites the user's previous ordering arrangement in a data migration — a hidden side effect. This is worth reporting as maintainability/side effect concern. Actually wait — need to be careful about semantics: order_index = 0 might just ensure offboarding appears first... Since the template is for offboarding flows, maybe the workflow is expected to have offboarding first. But there's no business justification in the PR to reorder. I'd report it as a medium finding: the migration changes existing order_index for existing rows — potentially surprising, should preserve the existing order index (only update order when inserting new row). Hmm, but note: it also inserts workflow_product for offboarding into all companies' 'fluxo-de-saida' workflows — even those that never used offboarding (perhaps the workflow is generic). And it will show up in their flow config. Already covered by confirmed finding #1? #1 focuses on module enabled check. The ordering overwrite is distinct. **New Issue 2: `ensureTemplate` always inserts a new template with is_active=1 on each company. If the company later has multiple "Offboarding com eSocial" templates after re-run?** No, ensureTemplate checks seed key; but if the migration is run on an environment where a company already created its own template with same name but different seed (not seeded), it will add one more. Fine. **New Issue 3: In `down()`, the migration sets is_active = 0 but does not delete the template's stages/activities/automations; but does it matter? The down() rollback keeps the template rows (disabled). Reasonable. But wait, down() filters by the seed key then deactivates. But if down runs then up runs again (re-migrate after rollback), ensureTemplate looks for seed_migration templates and finds none (settings updated removing seed_migration, is_active 0). Actually down() removes the seed_migration key and adds seed_migration_rolled_back; up() then can't find the template and would create a NEW template with same name (duplicate with the rolled-back one). That could cause duplicates after migrate:down + migrate. But the data were kept. It also deletes workflow_products created if flagged. Hmm — the up() would then find the workflow product... Actually the deletion only happens if workflow_product_was_created true and no other active template references it. After deletion, up re-creates it. Fine. But the duplicate template scenario: down() then up() would create a second template "Offboarding com eSocial (S-2299)" in the same workflow because the first (now inactive with seed_migration_rolled_back) doesn't match seed key. This is an idempotency edge case for migration cycles. Real deployments rarely do down+up. It's an edge case; not central. **New Issue 4 (Automation service) — Notifications and per-company module guard**... The executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft checks `$company->getEsocialMode() === null` -> skip. Good. **New Issue 5: `getOrCreateAssistantConversation($user)`** is called for the recipient user (responsible). But what if the responsible is the flow responsible who might not have a chat with Adriana yet? getOrCreate handles. Fine. **New Issue 6**: In `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` they call `$this->entityManager->flush()` twice and also executeNotify (which also flushes). All inside one method. However, when the event was found but eventStatus === 'existing_not_editable', the event remains unchanged, but the code STILL persists and flushes member metadata. Then executes notification. OK. **New Issue 7 — Bug candidate: When `eventStatus === 'updated'` or 'created' and event is persisted but there was no flush of `$event` before using `$event->getId()` in metadata second flush — they flush at 15027 (after persist of member). Actually they persist event at 15002 BEFORE 15027 flush; so the first flush at line 15027 flushes both event and member. Then line 15029-15035 second flush writes eventId. OK. **New Issue 8 — In `buildEsocialS2299ReviewUrl`, query param appended without '#' anchor style**: `$path . '?esocialTab=desligamento'` — There may be an existing pattern using `#` fragments or `?tab=...`. If other member page URLs use `?esocialTab=desligamento`? Search the templates for 'esocialTab'. Let me search for 'esocialTab' to confirm the review URL parameter matches the actual member page logic. **New Issue 9 — email template slug auto-selection.** In executeNotify, if no template & emailTemplateBody provided, it sends email with body. But if emailTemplateBody is present, it also calls `executeSendEmail` — which, per the note, automatically sends a chat message. The chat message from executeSendEmail uses the $fullMessage (title+message), with system_sender true -> Adriana. Good. Wait — Actually let me double-check: in executeNotify path, the email send occurs only when `$templateSlug || !empty($emailTemplateBody)`. For system_sender with only message_html set, yes email is sent. OK. But — actually there's a subtle behavior change: In the general refactor, previously the system sender was only for payroll members (sourceType = payroll closing). Now it's any config with `system_sender => true`. But ALSO the notification in-app for the responsible... in executeNotify, the in-app NotificationCenter button URL is '/chat?adriana=1'. It's created for ALL notification automations. Not changed. **Now examine: the metadata stored includes 'reviewUrl' with an internal absolute URL but no protocol; used in notifications; fine. **New issue: `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` writes `$metadata['esocialS2299Draft']['updatedAt']`; then if the same draft executed twice, notification appears each time (on each entry into stage). Re-entry can happen if member moves out then back in; or if automation is triggered again by on_enter being dispatched multiple times by the framework (e.g., when flow instance starts, each member entering stage). It may send multiple notifications. Not a blocker. **Concurrency duplicate-draft**: already not flagged explicitly; maybe part of #3. **New Issue 10 — Migration: templates seeded with automations whose action create_esocial_s2299_draft fires on entering stage 3; but the trigger `employee_enters_stage` is fired when members are added to a stage via `on_enter`. If there is any existing flow instance (active flow) in 'fluxo-de-saida' with members currently in stage, does creating the new template trigger side effects? No, it's just a template; only new instances from template. **New Issue 11 — `$company->getEsocialMode() === null` check**: For companies using "desligamento" eSocial with a different environment field? getEsocialMode presumably returns '1'/'2' or null. If null => esocial disabled. OK. Now, let me evaluate what specific additional real issues I can confirm with evidence: **(A) Migration order_index overwrite.** Confirmed by reading code: ensureWorkflowProduct updates order_index to 0 for an existing row. That changes the ordering of existing products inside the workflow for all companies, without business justification. This is a genuine side-effect in a data migration. But is it harmful? For 'fluxo-de-saida' workflow with only the offboarding product, order stays. For multi-product workflows, might reorder. Worth reporting as low/medium maintainability/side-effect. Wait, before reporting, check whether `order_index` = 0 leads to duplicates/order conflicts when the workflow already has multiple products with order_index 0? E.g., another product also at 0? Possibly. But the original code in workflow_product_exists... Hmm. The main concern: user config mutation. Actually, a clearer migration issue: **The seeded template is created with `is_active = 1` even if the company already has an active template in the same workflow for the offboarding product, producing two active templates side-by-side.** Not necessarily harmful. **(B) The duplication concern of the S-2299 draft creation and the existing official UI**: covered by #2/#3. **(C) The `down()` migration could delete the `workflow_products` row that other running flows rely on?** The delete query checks NOT EXISTS other active flow_templates with the product referencing the same workflow and is_active = 1. If the flow template is the only one referencing the product, it means the workflow product row was added by the migration; if it didn't exist before, other flows using the product wouldn't exist (they wouldn't have a template? Actually FlowInstances could reference product without a template? For older offboarding flows, maybe no flow_template rows exist, only workflow_products). Hmm. Deleting a workflow_product that was created by the migration is fine; if not created, don't delete. Guard: only if workflow_product_was_created true. OK. **(D) Migrations not being transactional with data written without FK checks**... Standard. **(E) Template seed uses `name` string 'Etapa 1 - Preparação' and stage dedupe uses LOWER(name); if the template already exists and user renamed a stage to match a different stage, the dedupe could attach automations to wrong stage on re-run? On re-run, ensureStage finds stage by name; the stage already has the automations (ensured previously). ensureAutomation dedupe by name+trigger+action. Suppose the user deleted the seeded automation and re-run migration? It would re-create? ensureAutomation returns if exists; if deleted, re-creates the same automation. That's fine-ish. **(F) An actual bug candidate in the migration: `ensureStage` uses `product_slot_index IS NULL` in SELECT; but flow_stages rows inserted by the seeded template are created with `product_slot_index NULL`. But wait — the template product is at slot_index 0; `FlowStage::getEffectiveSlotIndex()` treats NULL as 0. Consistent. **(G) Potential DB constraint issue with JSON columns: `action_config` is NOT NULL (type="json" not nullable). They always set it. conditions/actions nullable but set. trigger_type/action_type set. OK. **(H) Column lengths:** action_type column length=100. 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' = 26, fits. trigger_type 'on_all_activities_complete' fits. name 255. OK. **(I) `flow_activities` insert: columns flow_stage_id, name, activity_type, config, order_index, process_stage_type, onboarding_activity_type_id, offboarding_activity_type_id. Need to check FlowActivity entity columns NOT NULL. activity_type value 'activity'. Let me check FlowActivity entity to validate the columns used, since insert lists specific columns; if some have DB defaults etc. We should verify that 'process_stage_type' etc. columns exist. Presumably yes if the code elsewhere uses them. Might be safer to double check via the entity file but the migration likely modeled from the actual pattern of seeding commands (SeedPayrollFlowTemplatesCommand uses the same). Let me compare to SeedPayrollFlowTemplatesCommand to see consistent patterns, especially stage/activity/automation inserts, which would reinforce correctness. Let me read part of SeedPayrollFlowTemplatesCommand. Actually, given time constraints and the fact the guard test passes (MigrationDatabaseChangeDocGuardTest), and manual testing claim; focus on real functional bugs. Let me now think about **notification content issue**: message says "Abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar os detalhes." — in-app notification goes to responsible. But chat message text "$fullMessage" includes title and message; rendered in the assistant conversation as plain text, no buttons; good. Now **wait** — critical: In `sendChatNotification` for system sender, they persist a `ChatMessage` with `setConversationId($assistantConversation->getId())`. The assistant conversation belongs to `$user` (the recipient). Since `system_sender=true`, chat is from Adriana to the recipient responsible. But hold on: is the recipient the responsible who should receive review instructions? Yes. **But — in this flow, if the responsible is the same person as the employee?** Unlikely. Now let me re-examine the potential bug with the second metadata write: they reassign `$metadata = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? []` and write `$metadata['esocialS2299Draft']['eventId']` — this assumes esocialS2299Draft key present. It was present if the event exists (yes, because metadata is always set with the draft array before flush). So OK. Now let me examine more of the subtle problems with the second `eventId` when eventStatus='existing_not_editable': first flush stores eventId = existing event's id already, then second flush rewrites same. Harmless. **Now an actual functional bug candidate (new)**: In `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, they handle the case where `esocialTrabalhador` exists and `remuneracao` exists. But if `eventStatus === 'existing_not_editable'` — they do nothing with the event (not persisted), then metadata records eventStatus, and notification says official event exists. Fine. **Now consider a scenario when a *pending* draft exists (status pendente) from the official UI saveEventS2299 but no metadata** (first time this automation runs on an offboarding whose member previously had a draft created manually). Confirmed #3 covers duplicates. **Now consider the case where the automation runs with a *draft created by this automation earlier* but the event status changed to something other than pendente because the responsible submitted the draft through official flow (status became e.g. 'aguardando_envio' or sent). Then on re-entry to the stage, findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding returns the event with status != pendente -> existing_not_editable. Good — no overwrite of official event. OK. Let me now think about the **`nrInscTransmissor` in the created event uses onlyDigits((string) $company->getCnpj())** — the event entity EsocialEvents column nrInscTransmissor maybe string. saveEventS2299 uses sanitizeCNPJ. Equivalent. But hold on — `setTpInscTransmissor(1)` is set unconditionally. For offboarding with company being e.g., CNPJ-based, the transmitter is the company; tpInsc=1 means CNPJ. saveEventS2299 does the same. OK. Now let me look at potential **security issue in email**: The message_html contains the review URL; `executeSendEmail` gets it; no user-controlled data. safe. **Now examine the changed `system_sender` emailConfig — potential regression**: Previously in executeNotify, when the config has a `system_sender` (not present previously), it wasn't forwarded to emailConfig; the chat in payroll context... Actually, in the previous code the chat path determined system sender by sourceType. The addition simply forwards the config flag. For existing users (payroll), it keeps the same behavior via sourceType fallback. No regression. But there's a subtlety: in `sendChatNotification`, the new `$isSystemSender` flag also affects *email* path? No, only chat. Wait, we need to make sure `system_sender` is properly read from the config in `sendChatNotification`. Actually, in `executeNotify`, the config keys are merged into recipientContext including system_sender. `sendChatNotification` receives `$config` from executeSendEmail — where system_sender forwarded. It's in executeSendEmail that `sendChatNotification` is invoked with the email config. Let's verify that sendChatNotification gets config with system_sender forwarded: In executeNotify, emailConfig includes 'system_sender' => $config['system_sender']. executeSendEmail receives $emailConfig. Then inside executeSendEmail presumably it calls sendChatNotification($config=...), which reads $config['system_sender']. Need to check executeSendEmail merges. Given diff lines 13912-13914 (in sendChatNotification), the variable was computed in sendChatNotification and previously based solely on member source type. So yes config now flows. Let me verify sendChatNotification's signature and where it's called and whether config passed includes system_sender; quick search for 'function sendChatNotification' and its call. Actually given review time budget, focus on strong, evidence-based findings. Let me confirm how many previously confirmed findings we have (5) and add any new unique ones. Let me consider reporting the migration side-effect (order_index overwrite) and the duplicate `migrate:down` + `migrate:up` scenario? The latter is less impactful. Another candidate: **Migration `up()` — flow stage "Avançar ao concluir 100% das atividades" in Etapa 2 seeds stage_change with trigger on_all_activities_complete. But if the offboarding stage has exactly one activity, and the member completes 100% of the activities, the member will automatically advance from Etapa 2 to Etapa 3 — but only if the activities are actually marked complete. Fine. But wait — an important subtle bug: **Etapa 3 - Finalização also contains the same activity "Offboarding". So the finalization stage's activities completing... no stage_change automation in Etapa 3 to advance out. That's intended; last stage completes offboarding when all activities complete → the offboarding_completed trigger then would fire create_processo_seletivo? Actually on_offboarding_complete is a stage trigger fired when the offboarding itself completes (i.e., when the flow's last member completes last stage?). Wait, this is a flow-based offboarding where "offboarding_completed" trigger indicates the entire offboarding completed? Let's not overanalyze; this template replicates the standard default structure. Now — better new candidate: **The seeded S-2299 automation and template stage 3 create the draft "ao entrar na etapa final"** — but a stage may be entered multiple times... So a re-entry would fire again with onlyEmptyFields -> no update, but notification would still claim "atualizado". This ties to #4. Let me look for a distinct, strong, code-level bug: 1. **`findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal` compares the event's `dtDeslig` with a string parameter using DQL equality on a date field. Parameter is passed as string 'Y-m-d'. Doctrine typically converts string to DateTime based on field type when using query builder? In DQL comparisons of a date field to a parameter, Doctrine infers type from metadata for `setParameter` only if a type is provided or auto-detection works. Historically, DBAL requires typed params or matching conversion; but Doctrine ORM auto-detects parameter type from the field for `where` clauses via `Query\Expr`? Actually Doctrine ORM does infer the type from comparison field when the parameter is bound through `setParameter` without explicit type? It does NOT always. Let me recall: Doctrine ORM's `Parser` builds SQL with parameters; during execution, `SqlWalker`... Parameters set with `setParameter($name, $value)` without type are assigned default type from value (string). Then in SQL, comparing a DATE column to a string parameter: MySQL will coerce; DBAL with PDO MySQL sends string. Comparing DATE = '2026-09-01' works fine in MySQL. Since it's MySQL presumably, string comparison with a DATE column yields date parsing; it works. So not a bug. 2. **The `getOneOrNullResult` when two pendente... but pendente excluded. OK. 3. **A bug candidate: `esocialS2299EventMatchesContext` returns true when both dates are null, meaning an event with no dtDeslig could match regardless of the dismissal date. Fine. 4. **Missing: sets `setUpdatedAt` only when 'updated'. For new 'created' events, updatedAt remains null. If other code expects updatedAt not null... For EsocialEvents base entity, check updatedAt nullable. Likely nullable. Fine. 5. **A bug in the migration: seeding `flow_template_products` with `template_type` 'fixo'. Then flow_template product used to determine how many products... OK. 6. **Migration uses `LOWER(name)` — MySQL default collation likely case-insensitive, so dedupe might match existing stages with a different case. If template already seeded, and a new run, matching case-insensitively might collide if there are two stages with names differing by case? Not applicable. 7. **Migration `ensureOffboardingStages` always runs per template. `ensureAutomation` names contain accents. Given all this, I think the strongest additional new findings are: - **Migration side effect on existing workflow_products ordering** (updates order_index=0 even when the row already exists). Medium. - **Rollback/re-run cycle creates a duplicate template (down() deactivates but keeps template; up() can't find by seed key, creates a new active one).** Medium/Low. But this is about `doctrine:migrations:migrate prev` then forward again. Given migrations are generally run only forward, maybe low. Wait, actually down() + up() for data migrations is not a typical flow, but Doctrine supports executing `migrate prev` then `migrate`. The idempotency claim (rule: "Migration deve ser idempotente") suggests ensuring re-runs don't create duplicates. The duplicate-template scenario after down->up is plausible. But down() itself deactivates; maybe on purpose to keep a "recycle" record? When running down+up, we'd end up with 2 templates: one inactive (from down) and one new active. This could confuse users. It's a moderate maintainability issue. Might report with low severity. Hmm. But is it within scope? Could be considered. I think there's a more interesting and confirmable functional issue in the SERVICE. Let me revisit **notification about `responsible` resolution for offboarding flows when the flow responsible is not a CompanyMembers but maybe a User.** resolveEsocialS2299Responsible returns CompanyMembers only; if none -> error result. That will return success false & error; but the overall automation result might mark failure. OK. Now — **reconsider the 'draft_only' scenario messaging** - they always send the notification and return success true even when the event wasn't created (missing data) - the return 'success' true with 'message' saying 'dados eSocial pendentes...'. OK. **Let me double check `resolveRecipients` 'company_member' uses `$context['company_member_id']`. The executeNotify config 'company_member_id' is string responsible id, merged into recipientContext, so resolution works. Now — **A real bug might be in the message variables replacement: `replaceVariables('{{member_name}}', $member, $context)`**: $member is FlowInstanceMember. Does replaceVariables resolve {{member_name}} from FlowInstanceMember? Search for `member_name` template variable resolution. Let me look at replaceVariables implementation to see if `member_name` is supported. If not supported, the message will show the literal placeholder in chat/email — a real cosmetic/functional bug. Let me search 'member_name' in AutomationExecutionService.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "member_name"}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 20
2544|                    // notifyConfig com {{member_name}} literal porque a ponte lia message/title sem replace).
2657|            $hasRecordPlaceholder = str_contains($message, '{{member_name}}') || str_contains($message, '{{record_name}}');
2661|            // Step 1 — inject {{member_name}} right after "O registro" when missing.
2663|                $message = preg_replace('/\bO registro\b(?!\s*\{\{)/u', 'O registro {{member_name}}', $message, 1) ?: $message;
6164|            'member_name' => '',
6277|            $values['member_name'] = $fullName;
6914|        $message = 'O colaborador {{member_name}} precisa ter os dados de trabalhador e remuneração preenchidos para o eSocial.';
6915|        $messageHtml = '<p>O colaborador {{member_name}} precisa ter os dados de trabalhador e remuneração preenchidos para o eSocial.</p>';
6978|            // config['title'] here, placeholders like {{member_name}} inside the automation title stay literal.
13323|            '{{member_name}}'          => '',
13368|                $contextRecordName = trim((string) ($context['record_name'] ?? $context['member_name'] ?? ''));
13374|            $replacements['{{member_name}}'] = $fullName;
15039|                ? 'O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi atualizado a partir do offboarding. Abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar os detalhes.'
15040|                : 'O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding. Abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar os detalhes.';
15042|                ? '<p>O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi atualizado a partir do offboarding.</p>'
15043|                : '<p>O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding.</p>';
15048|                $notificationMessage = 'Já existe um evento S-2299 oficial para {{member_name}} e ele não pode ser editado pelo offboarding. Abra o chat com a Adriana para conferir a situação antes de seguir.';
15049|                $notificationMessageHtml = '<p>Já existe um evento S-2299 oficial para {{member_name}} e ele não pode ser editado pelo offboarding.</p><p>Confira a situação no chat com a Adriana antes de seguir.</p>';
15061|                $notificationMessage = 'O S-2299 de {{member_name}} ainda não foi criado porque faltam ' . $missingDescription . '. Complete os dados e abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar.';
15062|                $notificationMessageHtml = '<p>O S-2299 de {{member_name}} ainda não foi criado porque faltam ' . $missingDescription . '.</p><p>Complete os dados e abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar.</p>';

code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "function replaceVariables"}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 2
13316|    private function replaceVariables(string $text, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): string
13550|    private function replaceVariablesInArray(array $data, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array

Request #48 deepseek-v4-flash P:96.84K C:135 CR:89.6K CW:0 2179ms
Reasoning
Let me look at replaceVariables implementation (13316-13400) to see how member_name is resolved - presumably from member. Since $member here is a FlowInstanceMember of sourceType offboarding. Let's read.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 13400, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 13316}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15626)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 13316-13400
13316|    private function replaceVariables(string $text, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): string
13317|    {
13318|        $completionPctFormatted = isset($context['completionPercentage'])
13319|            ? number_format((float) $context['completionPercentage'], 0) . '%'
13320|            : '';
13321|
13322|        $replacements = [
13323|            '{{member_name}}'          => '',
13324|            '{{member_email}}'         => '',
13325|            '{{stage_name}}'           => '',
13326|            '{{product_name}}'         => '',
13327|            '{{company_name}}'         => '',
13328|            '{{flow_instance_id}}'     => '',
13329|            '{{flow_instance_name}}'   => '',
13330|            '{{flow_template_name}}'   => '',
13331|            '{{kanban_card_title}}'    => '',
13332|            '{{completion_percentage}}' => $completionPctFormatted,
13333|            '{{current_date}}'         => (new \DateTime())->format('d/m/Y'),
13334|            '{{current_time}}'         => (new \DateTime())->format('H:i'),
13335|            '{{assessment360_questionnaire_url}}' => '',
13336|            '{{assessment360_questionnaire_button_html}}' => '',
13337|        ];
13338|        
13339|        if ($member) {
13340|            $user = $member->getUser();
13341|            $companyMemberDirect = $member->getCompanyMember();
13342|            $profile = $user?->getProfile();
13343|
13344|            $fullName = '';
13345|            if ($profile) {
13346|                $fullName = trim($profile->getFirstName() . ' ' . $profile->getLastName());
13347|            }
13348|            if (empty($fullName) && $user) {
13349|                $fullName = $user->getEmail() ?? '';
13350|            }
13351|            if (empty($fullName) && $companyMemberDirect) {
13352|                $fullName = trim($companyMemberDirect->getFirstName() . ' ' . $companyMemberDirect->getLastName());
13353|                if (empty($fullName)) {
13354|                    $fullName = $companyMemberDirect->getEmail() ?? '';
13355|                }
13356|            }
13357|            if (empty($fullName)) {
13358|                $crmEntity = $this->resolveCrmRecordEntityFromFlowMember($member);
13359|                if ($crmEntity !== null) {
13360|                    if (method_exists($crmEntity, 'getNameLead')) {
13361|                        $fullName = trim((string) (($crmEntity->getNameLead() ?? '') . ' ' . ($crmEntity->getSurnameLead() ?? '')));
13362|                    } elseif (method_exists($crmEntity, 'getName')) {
13363|                        $fullName = trim((string) ($crmEntity->getName() ?? ''));
13364|                    }
13365|                }
13366|            }
13367|            if (empty($fullName)) {
13368|                $contextRecordName = trim((string) ($context['record_name'] ?? $context['member_name'] ?? ''));
13369|                $fullName = $contextRecordName !== '' ? $contextRecordName : $this->resolveMemberDisplayName($member);
13370|            }
13371|
13372|            $memberEmail = $user?->getEmail() ?? $companyMemberDirect?->getEmail() ?? '';
13373|
13374|            $replacements['{{member_name}}'] = $fullName;
13375|            $replacements['{{member_email}}'] = $memberEmail;
13376|            
13377|            if ($member->getCurrentStage()) {
13378|                $replacements['{{stage_name}}'] = $member->getCurrentStage()->getName();
13379|            }
13380|            
13381|            if ($member->getProduct()) {
13382|                $replacements['{{product_name}}'] = $member->getProduct()->getName();
13383|            }
13384|            
13385|            $flowInstance = $member->getFlowInstance();
13386|            if ($flowInstance) {
13387|                $replacements['{{flow_instance_id}}'] = (string) $flowInstance->getId();
13388|                $replacements['{{flow_instance_name}}'] = (string) ($flowInstance->getName() ?? '');
13389|                $flowTemplate = $flowInstance->getFlowTemplate();
13390|                if ($flowTemplate) {
13391|                    $replacements['{{flow_template_name}}'] = (string) $flowTemplate->getName();
13392|                }
13393|                if ($flowInstance->getCompany()) {
13394|                    $replacements['{{company_name}}'] = $flowInstance->getCompany()->getName();
13395|                }
13396|            }
13397|            $replacements['{{kanban_card_title}}'] = $this->resolveFlowKanbanCardTitle($member);
13398|
13399|            $a360QuestionnaireUrl = $this->resolveAssessment360BpmQuestionnaireUrl($member);
13400|            $replacements['{{assessment360_questionnaire_url}}'] = $a360QuestionnaireUrl;
Request #49 deepseek-v4-flash P:98.24K C:605 CR:96.9K CW:0 6143ms
Reasoning
replaceVariables resolves member_name from the FlowInstanceMember's user/companyMember. For offboarding FlowInstanceMember, does the member have a companyMember/User set to the dismissed employee? In offboarding flows, FlowInstanceMember probably corresponds to OffboardingMember (the employee). Given the flow member's sourceType offboarding and sourceId references OffboardingMember, its companyMember/user likely represents the employee being dismissed. So `{{member_name}}` = employee name. Also, note that message "foi criado" uses "de {{member_name}}" as in "O rascunho do S-2299 de X foi criado" - the employee's name. Good. Now consider the context they merge: member_id = companyMember (dismissed employee). If FlowInstanceMember doesn't have user/companyMember set, then replaceVariables would fallback: context member_id doesn't give a name. They also don't set record_name or member_name in context... Wait — if member_name resolution fails (empty fullName), final replacement member_name '' would show blank. For offboarding, member likely has companyMember. But note earlier in the flow instance member, they set metadata... Whatever. Let me step back and identify distinct NEW findings. We need to be concise and not repeat confirmed ones. **Strong new candidate: notifications go to the responsible, but with the wrong context member_name**: Let me determine whether in offboarding flow, FlowInstanceMember.getUser() corresponds to the responsible (manager) rather than the employee? Actually, in this codebase, for offboarding, "Membros" in the flow are the employees being dismissed? I think yes—the flow tracks each employee as a member who goes through steps. When moving the member to the final stage, member is the employee. The responsible (flow_responsible) is set on the flow instance. So notification to responsible about employee X's S-2299 — correct member_name. Alright. **Another candidate: sendChatNotification sending from Adriana as system sender only creates chat message and skips email to recipients etc. — Actually within sendChatNotification's system sender path, they return early; they don't send any actual "direct" message nor email. Where is sendChatNotification called? Possibly from executeSendEmail after email is sent, or before? If the system sender path returns without email? Need to understand call chain to see if returning early from sendChatNotification affects email sending. Let me read executeSendEmail's flow around chat invocation. Let me locate sendChatNotification definition and its callers.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "sendChatNotification("}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 3
13775|            $result = $this->sendChatNotification($user, $subject, $chatBody, $member, 'direct', $config);
13832|                $result = $this->sendChatNotification($user, $subject, $chatBody, $member, $recipientType, $config);
13878|    private function sendChatNotification(User $user, string $title, string $message, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, ?string $recipientType = null, array $config = []): array

Request #50 deepseek-v4-flash P:98.98K C:474 CR:98.82K CW:0 4615ms
Reasoning
sendChatNotification is called from executeSendEmail (probably around 13775-13832). In executeSendEmail, they first send email then send chat? Or chat then email? The return early in system sender path returns `['sent'=>true,...]`. If that return is from executeSendEmail's call to sendChatNotification, then it's fine: chat handled; email was already sent (or will be). The return value indicates chat sent. OK. Let me not chase further. Now — one more serious bug to inspect: `$event->setUpdatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable())` on updated events. EsocialEvents base entity has setUpdatedAt expecting DateTimeImmutable? Fine. Let me now review the base EsocialEvents fields to see if `company` property exists and `setNrInscTransmissor` etc. SaveEventS2299 already used them, so fine. I think I should now also review the migration's SQL for subtle data issues: In `up()` they call for each workflow: `$this->ensureWorkflowProduct($workflowId, $offboardingProductId, 0);` Potential DB violation: `workflow_products` may have unique constraint on (workflow_id, product_id). Since ensureWorkflowProduct checks existence before insert, no unique conflict. But there's another possibility: if the workflow product existed but with different `order_index`, the update to 0 may cause duplicate order_index with another product? Possibly minor. Hmm, let me check whether `workflow_products` requires created_at or updated_at not null fields? The insert into workflow_products: workflow_id, product_id, order_index only. If table has NOT NULL created_at/updated_at with default CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, fine. If not nullable without default, migration fails. Let me check the WorkflowProduct entity. Let me find WorkflowProduct entity.
Tool Calls (2)
file_find
Show Details
{"query_name": "WorkflowProduct.php"}
src/Entity/WorkflowProduct.php
file_find
Show Details
{"query_name": "FlowTemplateProduct.php"}
src/Entity/FlowTemplateProduct.php
Request #51 deepseek-v4-flash P:99.49K C:90 CR:99.46K CW:0 1450ms
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Entity/WorkflowProduct.php"}
File: src/Entity/WorkflowProduct.php (Total lines: 79)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-79
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Entity;
4|
5|use App\Repository\WorkflowProductRepository;
6|use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
7|
8|/**
9| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass=WorkflowProductRepository::class)
10| * @ORM\Table(name="workflow_products", uniqueConstraints={
11| *     @ORM\UniqueConstraint(name="unique_workflow_product", columns={"workflow_id", "product_id"})
12| * })
13| */
14|class WorkflowProduct
15|{
16|    /**
17|     * @ORM\Id
18|     * @ORM\GeneratedValue
19|     * @ORM\Column(type="integer")
20|     */
21|    private $id;
22|
23|    /**
24|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity=Workflow::class, inversedBy="workflowProducts")
25|     * @ORM\JoinColumn(nullable=false, onDelete="CASCADE")
26|     */
27|    private $workflow;
28|
29|    /**
30|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity=Product::class)
31|     * @ORM\JoinColumn(nullable=false, onDelete="CASCADE")
32|     */
33|    private $product;
34|
35|    /**
36|     * @ORM\Column(type="integer")
37|     */
38|    private int $orderIndex = 0;
39|
40|    public function getId(): ?int
41|    {
42|        return $this->id;
43|    }
44|
45|    public function getWorkflow(): ?Workflow
46|    {
47|        return $this->workflow;
48|    }
49|
50|    public function setWorkflow(?Workflow $workflow): self
51|    {
52|        $this->workflow = $workflow;
53|        return $this;
54|    }
55|
56|    public function getProduct(): ?Product
57|    {
58|        return $this->product;
59|    }
60|
61|    public function setProduct(?Product $product): self
62|    {
63|        $this->product = $product;
64|        return $this;
65|    }
66|
67|    public function getOrderIndex(): int
68|    {
69|        return $this->orderIndex;
70|    }
71|
72|    public function setOrderIndex(int $orderIndex): self
73|    {
74|        $this->orderIndex = $orderIndex;
75|        return $this;
76|    }
77|}
78|
79|
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Entity/FlowTemplateProduct.php"}
File: src/Entity/FlowTemplateProduct.php (Total lines: 136)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-136
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Entity;
4|
5|use App\Repository\FlowTemplateProductRepository;
6|use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
7|
8|/**
9| * FlowTemplateProduct - Entidade intermediária para guardar ordem dos produtos.
10| * Permite ordenação customizada e múltiplas instâncias do mesmo produto em um template.
11| *
12| * O campo `slotIndex` identifica a N-ésima ocorrência do mesmo produto no template:
13| *   slotIndex=0 → "Treinamentos 1" (primeira instância)
14| *   slotIndex=1 → "Treinamentos 2" (segunda instância), etc.
15| *
16| * A unique constraint é (flow_template_id, product_id, slot_index), portanto o
17| * mesmo produto pode aparecer N vezes com slots distintos.
18| *
19| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass=FlowTemplateProductRepository::class)
20| * @ORM\Table(name="flow_template_products", uniqueConstraints={
21| *     @ORM\UniqueConstraint(name="unique_template_product_slot", columns={"flow_template_id", "product_id", "slot_index"})
22| * })
23| */
24|class FlowTemplateProduct
25|{
26|    /**
27|     * @ORM\Id
28|     * @ORM\GeneratedValue
29|     * @ORM\Column(type="integer")
30|     */
31|    private $id;
32|
33|    /**
34|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity=FlowTemplate::class, inversedBy="templateProducts")
35|     * @ORM\JoinColumn(nullable=false, onDelete="CASCADE")
36|     */
37|    private $flowTemplate;
38|
39|    /**
40|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity=Product::class)
41|     * @ORM\JoinColumn(nullable=false, onDelete="CASCADE")
42|     */
43|    private $product;
44|
45|    /**
46|     * @ORM\Column(type="integer")
47|     * Ordem global do produto no template (posição na lista visual, não necessariamente igual ao slot).
48|     */
49|    private $orderIndex = 0;
50|
51|    /**
52|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=20, nullable=true)
53|     * Tipo de template: 'fixo' ou 'variavel'
54|     */
55|    private $templateType = 'fixo';
56|
57|    /**
58|     * @ORM\Column(type="integer", options={"default": 0})
59|     * Zero-based index for repeated instances of the same product in a template.
60|     * slot 0 = first occurrence ("Produto 1"), slot 1 = second ("Produto 2"), etc.
61|     */
62|    private int $slotIndex = 0;
63|
64|    public function getId(): ?int
65|    {
66|        return $this->id;
67|    }
68|
69|    public function getFlowTemplate(): ?FlowTemplate
70|    {
71|        return $this->flowTemplate;
72|    }
73|
74|    public function setFlowTemplate(?FlowTemplate $flowTemplate): self
75|    {
76|        $this->flowTemplate = $flowTemplate;
77|        return $this;
78|    }
79|
80|    public function getProduct(): ?Product
81|    {
82|        return $this->product;
83|    }
84|
85|    public function setProduct(?Product $product): self
86|    {
87|        $this->product = $product;
88|        return $this;
89|    }
90|
91|    public function getOrderIndex(): ?int
92|    {
93|        return $this->orderIndex;
94|    }
95|
96|    public function setOrderIndex(int $orderIndex): self
97|    {
98|        $this->orderIndex = $orderIndex;
99|        return $this;
100|    }
101|
102|    public function getTemplateType(): ?string
103|    {
104|        return $this->templateType;
105|    }
106|
107|    public function setTemplateType(?string $templateType): self
108|    {
109|        $this->templateType = $templateType;
110|        return $this;
111|    }
112|
113|    public function getSlotIndex(): int
114|    {
115|        return $this->slotIndex;
116|    }
117|
118|    public function setSlotIndex(int $slotIndex): self
119|    {
120|        $this->slotIndex = $slotIndex;
121|        return $this;
122|    }
123|
124|    /**
125|     * Human-readable label for this product slot.
126|     * For slot 0 (single instance) returns null; for slot N returns "Produto (N+1)".
127|     * Controllers/serializers decide whether to show the suffix.
128|     */
129|    public function resolveSlotLabel(?string $productName = null): string
130|    {
131|        $base = $productName ?? ($this->product?->getName() ?? 'Produto');
132|        return $this->slotIndex === 0 ? $base : $base . ' ' . ($this->slotIndex + 1);
133|    }
134|}
135|
136|
Request #52 deepseek-v4-flash P:101.46K C:1.65K CR:99.58K CW:0 13211ms
Reasoning
Interesting — WorkflowProduct order_index has default 0. Unique constraint on (workflow_id, product_id). But the migration `ensureWorkflowProduct` updates order_index only if exists; otherwise inserts. Also there's a **unique constraint** check on workflow_products (workflow_id, product_id), so the migration's existence check protects from duplicate inserts; insert order fine. But important: WorkflowProduct.entity says the table name is workflow_products with `workflow_id` and `product_id`; the migration's DELETE in down() and SELECT use these columns — matches. Hmm, now consider potential real issue: **If a company's 'fluxo-de-saida' workflow has NO offboarding product**, the migration adds workflow_products row. If the company then has another existing active flow template referencing offboarding product in same workflow with is_active... whatever. Now, an important point: workflow unique constraint `unique_workflow_product (workflow_id, product_id)`; but existing flows may not have a workflow_product at all; adding is fine. OK, let's examine whether the seeded `flow_template_products` uses correct column `template_type` length 20, 'fixo' fits. `flow_stages` insert provides stage_category/phase_number/product_slot_index NULL. But note: the insert includes columns `stage_category, phase_number, product_slot_index` with value NULL - MySQL allows explicit null. Now I want to revisit the new service code once more for the specific bug where **`eventStatus === 'updated'` calls apply with onlyEmptyFields = true, then says event updated... But, is there also stale `dtDeslig` not updated case? Yes, #4 confirmed. Let me next consider **eventStatus 'created' but then the metadata stores eventId=null first, then second flush writes event ID - fine; but is metadata's `'eventStatus'` = 'created' stored; when later run, `findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding` finds event (eventId set). It matches date/remuneration and status pendente -> 'updated' path. Now apply with onlyEmptyFields = true. The mtvDeslig/dismissal data unchanged? Actually on the first creation they applied payload with onlyEmptyFields=false, which fills all payload fields from config: but config lacks values for most, so fields set to null. So event.mtvDeslig stays null (they tried set with null -> value null => skip). dtDeslig set from offboarding dismissal date. Fine. Second run: payload has dataDesligamento = dismissal date. If date changed, event's metadata link check compares dates: `esocialS2299EventMatchesContext` compares event dtDeslig (old date) vs dismissal date (new) -> mismatch, returns null -> findExisting... for the new date won't find the old pendente (status pendente excluded) -> creates a NEW draft with the new date; the OLD pendente draft stays around untouched -> two pendente events for the same worker, one with old date that may be meaningless/never cleaned. This is the duplicate-draft-on-date-change scenario. Is it worth reporting as distinct from #3/#4? The scenario differs from #3 (draft created elsewhere) and from #4 (fields not updated on re-run of same event). It's a consequence of the same underlying design. Since instructions say to avoid duplicating confirmed findings, but this is a specific new outcome: an event linked in metadata, on date change, will be abandoned and a second draft created instead of updating the existing draft (idempotency breaks). Might report as medium. Hmm — but is it really the case that the dismissal date of an offboarding can change after entering stage 3? Possibly (final stage entered when exit date set?). If user changed dismissal date earlier... The automation only fires on entering stage, so normally data set before entering final stage. Changing after is less common. But re-run also occurs if they delete and re-add the same member to the stage or re-trigger on_enter. Eh. Maybe better report the **notification for eventStatus 'updated' claims updated even though fields not updated** — already covered by #4's essence (message inconsistent). #4 says: "Enquanto a notificação e o retorno dizem que o rascu...". Confirmed #4 text: "o rascunho mantém o valor antigo mesmo assim — enquanto a notificação e o retorno dizem que o rascu..." — so #4 includes messaging. So don't repeat. Let me find fresh issues in other files: **templates (list_automations/flow_detail)** — just label additions; fine. **config yaml** — keys fine. **Migration** — possible issue: **The migration seeds the automation with trigger 'on_enter' to stage 3 create S-2299 draft. But allowed trigger per YAML: only employee_enters_stage. That matches. **Migration — one more issue: The seeded `flow_stages` for Etapa 2 uses 'on_all_activities_complete' + action 'stage_change' with config = []; and the member advance trigger config: conditions config value 100. This means if the stage has the single seeded activity and user marks activity complete, the member auto-advances to Etapa 3 and S-2299 draft is created upon entry. That means the draft is created BEFORE all offboarding procedures in Etapa 3 complete — which is the intent ("na etapa final"). Potential issue: the seeded activity 'Offboarding' inside Etapa 3 - Finalização. When the employee "completes" the single 'Offboarding' activity of Etapa 3, the offboarding_completed trigger (on_offboarding_complete) fires creating processo seletivo... Let me check trigger 'on_offboarding_complete' semantics; is it triggered when the member completes all activities of the last stage? Probably. OK. Let me now think about **the in-app notification center `content`**: they pass `trim($title . ': ' . $message)` where message may contain newlines etc. Fine. **Bug candidate: In executeNotify, when no 'recipients' and 'to' is company_member, they build recipients from config 'to'. Then each recipient's resolveRecipients. Then emailConfig to user email... but executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft is about notifying about an S-2299 draft review. Email is sent to responsible with subject/title and html body. But do they really want to send an email? The automation description in YAML: "notifica o responsável para revisar o desligamento eSocial." That matches. Now — let me check `executeSendEmail` needs a `template`; when no template but body present, does executeSendEmail send email properly (with the html body) or require a template slug to send? At 7028 if emailTemplateBody present, they send. executeSendEmail handles raw body? The emailConfig contains 'body' => $emailTemplateBody and no template. Does executeSendEmail send raw body email? We saw from other callers, they pass body; but normally for emails without template they might not send actual email but only chat. Let me quickly check executeSendEmail around 13750. Let me read executeSendEmail definition to understand body handling.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 13860, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 13700}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15626)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 13700-13860
13700|
13701|    /**
13702|     * Creates a canonical chat message for BPM request notifications.
13703|     * Keeps parity with the email content and guarantees decision links are present.
13704|     */
13705|    private function buildRequestNotificationChatBody(array $values, array $config, string $fallbackBody = ''): string
13706|    {
13707|        $title = trim((string) ($values['title'] ?? $config['title'] ?? 'Solicitação para Aprovação'));
13708|        $requestTypeLabel = trim((string) ($values['request_type_label'] ?? $config['request_type_label'] ?? 'Solicitação'));
13709|        $message = trim((string) ($values['message'] ?? $config['message'] ?? 'Uma solicitação foi criada.'));
13710|        $recordName = trim((string) ($values['record_name'] ?? $values['memberName'] ?? $config['record_name'] ?? 'colaborador'));
13711|        $companyName = trim((string) ($values['companyName'] ?? $values['company_name'] ?? ''));
13712|        $approveText = trim((string) ($config['approve_button_text'] ?? 'Aprovar solicitação'));
13713|        $rejectText = trim((string) ($config['reject_button_text'] ?? 'Rejeitar solicitação'));
13714|        $approveUrl = trim((string) ($config['approve_url'] ?? ''));
13715|        $rejectUrl = trim((string) ($config['reject_url'] ?? ''));
13716|
13717|        $lines = [];
13718|        $lines[] = 'Olá,';
13719|        $lines[] = '';
13720|        $lines[] = 'Você recebeu uma nova solicitação relacionada ao colaborador ' . $recordName . '.';
13721|        $lines[] = '';
13722|        $lines[] = 'Tipo de solicitação: ' . $requestTypeLabel;
13723|        $lines[] = '';
13724|        if ($message !== '') {
13725|            $lines[] = $message;
13726|            $lines[] = '';
13727|        }
13728|        if ($approveUrl !== '') {
13729|            $lines[] = $approveText . ': ' . $approveUrl;
13730|        }
13731|        if ($rejectUrl !== '') {
13732|            $lines[] = $rejectText . ': ' . $rejectUrl;
13733|        }
13734|        if ($approveUrl !== '' || $rejectUrl !== '') {
13735|            $lines[] = '';
13736|        }
13737|        $lines[] = 'Equipe de Recursos Humanos';
13738|        if ($companyName !== '') {
13739|            $lines[] = $companyName;
13740|        }
13741|
13742|        $body = trim(implode("\n", $lines));
13743|        if ($body === '' && trim($fallbackBody) !== '') {
13744|            return trim($fallbackBody);
13745|        }
13746|
13747|        return $body;
13748|    }
13749|
13750|    /**
13751|     * Envia chat para emails específicos (já resolvidos), sem re-resolver por tipo.
13752|     * Usado quando executeNotify já resolveu os destinatários individualmente.
13753|     */
13754|    private function sendChatToSpecificEmails(
13755|        array $emails,
13756|        FlowInstanceMember $member,
13757|        string $subject,
13758|        string $body,
13759|        array $config = []
13760|    ): array {
13761|        $chatUserIds = [];
13762|        $userRepo = $this->entityManager->getRepository(User::class);
13763|
13764|        $chatBody = strip_tags($body);
13765|        $chatBody = html_entity_decode($chatBody, ENT_QUOTES | ENT_HTML5, 'UTF-8');
13766|        if (empty($chatBody)) {
13767|            $chatBody = 'Você tem uma nova notificação.';
13768|        }
13769|
13770|        foreach ($emails as $email) {
13771|            $user = $userRepo->findOneBy(['email' => $email]);
13772|            if (!$user) {
13773|                continue;
13774|            }
13775|            $result = $this->sendChatNotification($user, $subject, $chatBody, $member, 'direct', $config);
13776|            if ($result['sent'] ?? false) {
13777|                $chatUserIds[] = $user->getId();
13778|            }
13779|        }
13780|
13781|        return $chatUserIds;
13782|    }
13783|
13784|    private function sendChatForRecipientType(
13785|        string $recipientType, 
13786|        FlowInstanceMember $member, 
13787|        string $subject, 
13788|        string $body, 
13789|        array $values = [],
13790|        array $config = []
13791|    ): array {
13792|        $chatUserIds = [];
13793|        
13794|        try {
13795|            // Resolver destinatários do tipo (passar config para ter acesso a role_id e company_member_id)
13796|            $users = $this->resolveRecipients($recipientType, $member, $config);
13797|            
13798|            if (empty($users)) {
13799|                $this->log('warning', 'Nenhum usuário encontrado para tipo de destinatário no chat', [
13800|                    'recipientType' => $recipientType
13801|                ]);
13802|                return [];
13803|            }
13804|            
13805|            // Montar corpo da mensagem para chat (remover HTML se necessário)
13806|            $chatBody = $body;
13807|            
13808|            // Se o body está vazio mas há valores do template, tentar montar uma mensagem básica
13809|            if (empty($chatBody) && !empty($values)) {
13810|                $chatBody = "Você recebeu uma nova notificação sobre: " . ($values['stage_name'] ?? $values['product_name'] ?? 'Processo');
13811|            }
13812|            
13813|            // Remover tags HTML para chat (simplificado)
13814|            $chatBody = strip_tags($chatBody);
13815|            $chatBody = html_entity_decode($chatBody, ENT_QUOTES | ENT_HTML5, 'UTF-8');
13816|            
13817|            // Substituir variáveis se necessário
13818|            $chatBody = $this->replaceVariables($chatBody, $member, []);
13819|            $subject = $this->replaceVariables($subject, $member, []);
13820|            
13821|            // Se ainda está vazio, usar mensagem padrão
13822|            if (empty($chatBody)) {
13823|                $chatBody = "Você tem uma nova notificação.";
13824|            }
13825|            
13826|            error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] Mensagem preparada - Subject: {$subject}, Body length: " . strlen($chatBody));
13827|            
13828|            // Enviar para cada usuário
13829|            foreach ($users as $user) {
13830|                error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] Enviando para user ID: " . $user->getId() . " (" . $user->getEmail() . "), recipientType: " . $recipientType);
13831|                
13832|                $result = $this->sendChatNotification($user, $subject, $chatBody, $member, $recipientType, $config);
13833|                
13834|                error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] Resultado: " . json_encode($result));
13835|                
13836|                if ($result['sent'] ?? false) {
13837|                    $chatUserIds[] = $user->getId();
13838|                }
13839|            }
13840|            
13841|            if (!empty($chatUserIds)) {
13842|                $this->log('info', '💬 Mensagens no chat enviadas automaticamente', [
13843|                    'recipientType' => $recipientType,
13844|                    'userIds' => $chatUserIds,
13845|                    'count' => count($chatUserIds)
13846|                ]);
13847|                error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] ✅ SUCESSO - Enviado para " . count($chatUserIds) . " usuário(s)");
13848|            }
13849|            
13850|        } catch (\Exception $e) {
13851|            error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] ❌ ERRO: " . $e->getMessage());
13852|            error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] Stack: " . $e->getTraceAsString());
13853|            
13854|            $this->log('error', 'Erro ao enviar mensagens no chat para tipo de destinatário', [
13855|                'recipientType' => $recipientType,
13856|                'error' => $e->getMessage()
13857|            ]);
13858|        }
13859|        
13860|        error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] FIM - Total enviado: " . count($chatUserIds));
Request #53 deepseek-v4-flash P:105.35K C:3.49K CR:103.04K CW:0 26913ms
Reasoning
OK. Now the system sender in sendChatNotification is invoked from `sendChatForRecipientType` with `$config` merged? When executeNotify -> executeSendEmail -> ... The config passed to sendChatNotification includes the recipientConfig including 'system_sender'. Let me trace: executeSendEmail receives emailConfig that includes system_sender. executeSendEmail presumably calls sendChatForRecipientType or sendChatToSpecificEmails with the config. For system sender to reach sendChatNotification, config must flow. Given the new code reads `$config['system_sender']` inside sendChatNotification, they intend that flow. Actually wait — in executeNotify flow, recipient was already resolved to user, so executeSendEmail probably uses sendChatToSpecificEmails($emails, $member, ...). But executeNotify passes emailConfig['to'] = user email; executeSendEmail might send via sendChatToSpecificEmails with the email config — which passes `$config` = emailConfig including system_sender. sendChatNotification's `recipientType = 'direct'` (hardcoded), and system_sender flag read from config; the direct path sets isDirectMessage but the system_sender check runs before direct, so chat is posted in assistant conversation as Adriana. Great. Given PR evidence says tested manually (Adriana chat), OK. Now let me focus: Distinct NEW findings worth reporting: **Finding N1 (Migration, side effect on existing config):** `ensureWorkflowProduct` overwrites order_index to 0 for existing rows and also silently attaches the offboarding product to workflows that never had it (though #1 covers the missing per-company module check broadly, this specific overwrite of ordering is distinct). Actually if we report this, we risk overlap with #1? #1 = module enablement. Overwrite of order_index is a distinct side-effect. But maybe I should weigh: is it "likely real"? For existing offboarding workflows the row already exists and order index may be 0 already. Only in workflows where offboarding isn't at position 0 it changes; but for 'fluxo-de-saida', likely only product. Hmm. Actually, think again about the broader significance: The migration seeds into every company with a `fluxo-de-saida` workflow — but that includes companies where offboarding is not enabled. The main intended target: companies already using the workflow for offboarding. The seeding adds an offboarding product row to companies using 'fluxo-de-saida' for some other purpose. Given #1 exists, the ordering update is minor. **Finding N2 (Service):** re-running the automation after dismissal date changed creates a second pendente draft while leaving the old draft active, because the metadata-linked event is found only when the dismissal date matches and `findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal` ignores pending drafts (filters `status != 'pendente'`). Consequences: duplicate pending S-2299 drafts; eSocial submission would create duplicate events; old draft never cancelled. Suggestion: when a metadata-linked draft no longer matches the new dismissal date, update its dtDeslig/fields in place (or inactivate old draft). Distinct from #3 (externally-created draft) and #4 (same event update)? #4 is about same-event updates with onlyEmptyFields leaving stale values. #3 is about a pendente event created outside the automation (via UI saveEventS2299). The new scenario is about the draft created by this automation itself when the dismissal date changes: the metadata linkage logic will abandon it and create a new one. This is a distinct duplicate-draft consequence. However, it's arguable that it overlaps with #3's core message: "duplica evento pendente... a busca por sourceMetadata só encontra eve..." Actually #3 is exactly about ignoring pendente events outside metadata. This new scenario is within metadata but fails date-match then... re-creates. The #4 text: "Na reexecução (evento pendente já localizado), o payload só preenche campos vazios... Se a data de desligamento ou outro dado mudar no offboarding depois da primeira execução, o rascunho mantém o valor antigo mesmo assim" — In #4, they assume the event is still "localizado" (linked). But in reality, if the date changed, the event is NOT localized (match fails) — meaning the consequence they describe (draft keeps old value) doesn't happen; instead a NEW draft is created. Hmm, so #4's premise (draft keeps old date while re-linked) is partially inaccurate; the actual behavior for the date change is: new draft creation, duplicate. For other fields (motivo etc.), onlyEmptyFields means the fields remain empty if config later provides them; if config fields never set (has_config false) they'd remain empty always. Given nuance, I can report the duplicate-draft on date change as a distinct consequence: The check `findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding` matches date strictly; when the offboarding dismissal date changes after the draft was created, the automation will not find its own previous draft (metadata match fails due to date mismatch) and creates a second pending draft instead of updating the first. I think it's a genuine and distinct bug in idempotency that would occur specifically on data change (a common offboarding scenario: exit date adjusted). Report as medium/high. But wait, is it really reachable? The trigger is on_enter stage entry. A member entering stage 3 triggers. If exit date later changed while member still in stage 3 (or re-enters), when would the automation run again? Only if the member re-enters the stage (e.g., they get moved back to stage 2 then forward again), or if the automation is re-triggered. On the second entry, the draft is created with the old date; then after the date changed in the meantime, on another re-entry (if they go back/forth) the automation would create duplicate. Or if they run the flow from the start again. It's an edge. Hmm. Actually, the automation is described as idempotent; the date check mismatch is likely a code-level issue to flag. Alternatively, we can keep it simple and not over-report, given the risk of overlap. **Finding N3 (Service): time-of-check / non-atomic metadata+event creation race** — not report. **Finding N4 — An actual subtle bug: `pensAlim` field mapping.** In the S-2299 payload, the key used is 'pensAlim' with `intOrNull` and stored in `$event->setPensAlim(?int)`. In `saveEventS2299` (existing code), `pensAlim` is stored directly from data. Not a new issue. **Finding N5 — `dataDesligamento` source**: payload sets dataDesligamento from offboardingMember->getDismissalDate() which might be null for non-termination offboardings (e.g., voluntary resignation without formal exit date). Then event created with dtDeslig null. That'd be a draft with no dismissal date. Fine as a draft; but an S-2299 draft with no dismissal date might fail validation later. It's a "draft", review. **Finding N6 — Migration doc**: The rules say doc for migration must exist in docs/database-changes; PR mentions it created and guard test passed. But the file isn't present in the <review_files> (nor other_changed_files, which listed 3 files not including md). Wait — other_changed_files lists only 3 files; review_files includes 5; total 8; but PR says 10 changed files (php=4, twig=3, md=2, yaml=1). php=4: entity, migration, service, test = 4. twig=3: motivo_desligamento + list_automations + flow_detail = 3. md=2: two docs (guide + database-changes). yaml=1. That sums to 10. other_changed_files only shows 3 of the remaining... The other_changed_files section is truncated? Actually it lists entity, template, test only — 3 files. The 2 md docs aren't listed in other_changed_files (they might be among the review group? no). So we can't verify doc file presence from this set. But the PR text states documentation created and the guard passed. We shouldn't claim missing doc. OK. Let me step back and check the second strongest candidate: **YAML action placement under `movement` section** affects how the automation config UI renders/validates the action. Let's check how the config YAML is consumed to build the automation UI and to allow/block certain sections. In `list_automations.html.twig`? Perhaps not critical. Let me look at what a "movement" action does when has_config false and type stage_change etc. Might matter for the front-end dropdown to show this action only in the "movement" category. But since the action has its own type, and the UI likely lists action ids by category, fine. Let me quickly verify how action YAML definitions map `type` and id — In executeAction, action['type'] used = yaml `type` (e.g., 'create_esocial_s2299_draft'). And the seeded automation actions array uses 'type' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' consistent with the yaml `type`. But note for `send_email_flow_responsible` (the seeded action in Stage 1), the actions array uses 'type' => 'send_email', which is the yaml `type` of the YAML action id send_email_flow_responsible, good. For stage_change, the action used 'stage_change' which corresponds to yaml movement action `move_to_next_stage` type `stage_change`. Great consistency. So the seeded automations align. Now, importantly: **Automation config for `create_esocial_s2299_draft` has `_default_automation_id` inside actionConfig and actions config; irrelevant to execution. Let me now consider the scenario where the automation is executed from the YAML/flow for `offboarding` product on a company where eSocial disabled: skip (executed false, skipped true) with reason. OK. Now — **A potentially important bug: In executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft, when `esocialTrabalhador` exists but `remuneracao` is missing, `$missing = ['esocial_remuneration_data']`, event stays null, eventStatus 'draft_only'. Return success true message about pending data. But note metadata says eventStatus 'draft_only'. OK. Now, but look at the notification when missing: they say "Complete os dados e abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar." Good. **Critical question: is the automation run within a transaction that could roll back the event creation but not the notification?** No explicit transaction. All operations via EM then flush. If an exception occurs after event persist but before flush, event not flushed => nothing. OK. Now, one more subtle but real issue: **Two flushes + notification within one execution could flush pending changes unrelated to this action.** That's typical in this service. Now let me consider the **offboarding.yaml yaml key spelling** - keys in the new block: `allowed_triggers`, `blocked_triggers`, `blocked_trigger_message`, `config_preset`, `has_config`, `description`, `icon`, `title`, `type`, `id`. These match the others. OK. Let me now check the **list_automations.html.twig and flow_detail.html.twig label additions** – they add mapping keys 'create_esocial_s2299_draft'. Need to confirm that the label map uses action `type` (not id) to look up. In flow_detail, computeAutomationDisplayName maps by the action `type` key. 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' is both type and id (type = create_esocial_s2299_draft). OK. At this point, I need to decide final comments. Candidates: 1. New: Duplicate pending draft when dismissal date changes (metadata event-match fails, then a new draft is created while the old draft remains). Medium/high, bug. Let me verify more concretely by walking the code for date-change re-run: - First run: date D1. metadata eventId E1, event E1 has dtDeslig D1, status pendente. - Dismissal date changed to D2. Second run: findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding -> metadata eventId E1; esocialS2299EventMatchesContext checks E1.dtDeslig (D1) vs dismissalDate D2 -> false -> returns null. - findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal(D2): looks for non-pendente event with dtDeslig=D2 -> none -> returns null (E1 is pendente and dt D1). - createEsocialS2299DraftEvent -> creates E2 with D2, metadata eventId updated to E2. Result: E1 (pendente, D1) and E2 (pendente, D2) both exist; E1 will never be cleaned. Duplicate drafts for same employee/remuneration; depending on eSocial rules for unique event per dismissal date... could be submitted later producing duplicates. The design intent "idempotente: não deve duplicar evento pendente já existente para o mesmo contexto" — this is a duplicate creation in the same context (worker) with a changed date. Report. 2. Migration ordering overwrite — report low/medium. 3. Possibly report: `ensureTemplate`/seed migration duplicates after `down()` then `up()`. Low. Also, another real functional candidate in service: **If `company_member` (dismissed employee) has no linked EsocialDadosTrabalhador but there already exists an S-2299 official event for them (created directly in UI) — the automation stores 'missing' = worker data... Actually the official event already exists in the desligamento tab which the responsible can see; notification says "ainda não foi criado porque faltam dados de trabalhador". Wait — if worker data missing, how could an official event already exist? It requires EsocialDadosTrabalhador. Since it's missing, no event could exist. So fine. Let me also examine whether the migration references flow table columns that in DB might have different names than entity (they likely match). The migration inserts into flow_activities columns: process_stage_type, onboarding_activity_type_id, offboarding_activity_type_id; Let me quickly validate FlowActivity entity for columns and required NOT NULL fields to avoid a migration failure on those columns existing? The PR claims tested manually in dev. We'll trust. But wait — there's an important potential runtime bug in the migration seed: **`ensureAutomation` INSERT lists columns: (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, fixed_stage_type, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index) VALUES (:stageId, NULL, NULL, ...)**. The DB column `trigger_type` and `action_type` lengths (100). Values fit. **Migration validity check (up)**: `findActiveProductId('offboarding')` returns the active product; if no such product (maybe products table uses `is_active` column vs `active`)? The migration uses `active = 1`. Need to confirm products table column is `active`. Let me search products entity or table for 'active'. If the column name is `is_active`, then query fails (unknown column) causing migration error in all environments. The product entity likely has `isActive` with column `is_active`? Let's check the Product entity quickly.
Tool Calls (2)
file_find
Show Details
{"query_name": "Product.php"}
migrations/Version20260428153000_MetaHumanCommitteeAuditProduct.php
migrations/Version20260428160000_MetaHumanStrategicActionsProduct.php
migrations/Version20260430120000_MetaHumanStrategicActionsLegalProduct.php
src/Entity/CrmProduct.php
src/Entity/FlowTemplateProduct.php
src/Entity/Product.php
src/Entity/WorkflowProduct.php
src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowResolvedProduct.php
src/Service/MetaHuman/MetaHumanAiCoachProduct.php
src/Service/MetaHuman/MetaHumanCommitteeAuditProduct.php
src/Service/MetaHuman/MetaHumanSpecializedCommitteesProduct.php
src/Service/MetaHuman/MetaHumanStrategicActionsLegalProduct.php
src/Service/MetaHuman/MetaHumanStrategicActionsProduct.php
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "column(name=\"active\"", "use_perl_regexp": false}
File: src/Entity/EmployeeAdvocacy/SettingsEmployeeAdvocacy.php
Match lines: 1
47|     * @ORM\Column(name="active", type="boolean", nullable=false, options={"default": true})

Request #54 deepseek-v4-flash P:109.09K C:61 CR:108.8K CW:0 1926ms
Reasoning
Let me check Product entity for its active column mapping.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Entity/Product.php"}
File: src/Entity/Product.php (Total lines: 77)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-77
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Entity;
4|
5|use App\Repository\ProductRepository;
6|use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
7|
8|/**
9| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass=ProductRepository::class)
10| * @ORM\Table(name="products")
11| */
12|class Product
13|{
14|    /**
15|     * @ORM\Id
16|     * @ORM\GeneratedValue
17|     * @ORM\Column(type="integer")
18|     */
19|    private $id;
20|
21|    /**
22|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=255)
23|     */
24|    private $name;
25|
26|    /**
27|     * @ORM\Column(type="boolean")
28|     */
29|    private $active;
30|
31|    /**
32|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=255, unique=true, nullable=true)
33|     */
34|    private ?string $slug = null;
35|
36|    public function getId(): ?int
37|    {
38|        return $this->id;
39|    }
40|
41|    public function getName(): ?string
42|    {
43|        return $this->name;
44|    }
45|
46|    public function setName(string $name): self
47|    {
48|        $this->name = $name;
49|
50|        return $this;
51|    }
52|
53|    public function isActive(): ?bool
54|    {
55|        return $this->active;
56|    }
57|
58|    public function setActive(bool $active): self
59|    {
60|        $this->active = $active;
61|
62|        return $this;
63|    }
64|
65|    public function getSlug(): ?string
66|    {
67|        return $this->slug;
68|    }
69|
70|    public function setSlug(?string $slug): self
71|    {
72|        $this->slug = $slug;
73|
74|        return $this;
75|    }
76|}
77|
Request #55 deepseek-v4-flash P:109.68K C:1.34K CR:109.06K CW:0 11127ms
Reasoning
`products.active` exists. Good. Let me now verify the `workflows` table `slug` column and `company_id`. Probably exists. OK. Now let me also check `flow_automations` insert: column `trigger_type` length 100. `on_all_activities_complete` etc. fine. Now let me look at the second database scenario more concretely for the migration. Is there a unique constraint on `flow_stages` that might conflict? Probably none. `flow_activities` unique? Probably none. Let me decide final set of comments. Given the requirement to not repeat confirmed findings, and to be precise, I'll report: **New comment 1 (migration, maintainability/side-effect, medium):** `ensureWorkflowProduct` overwrites `order_index = 0` even for a product row that already existed — mutating the current ordering of products in existing offboarding workflows across every company, with no justification in the PR. Better: only set order_index when inserting (insert default 0) or preserve existing order. Let me write it in pt-BR simple style. Wait, should I double check with the down() code that references order index? No. **New comment 2 (service, idempotency bug on changed dismissal date, medium):** as described. Attach to line 14990 `$event = $this->findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal(...)` or lines 14983-14997. Actually, let's be careful: Is it plausible that the member is moved out of the final stage and back in, re-triggering on_enter? The seeded flow's stage 3 has no auto-advance, but a user can manually move a member back to stage 2 or 1 (stage_change_previous) or forward/back in kanban. On manual back-and-forth, on_enter fires again. During that time, if exit date changed... While the exact scenario is somewhat narrow, the same defect triggers in a simpler way: Suppose the automation runs once (draft E1 with D1). Then the responsible corrects the offboarding dismissal date to D2 (maybe before moving member forward) and re-advances them; re-entry triggers run; result: duplicate pending event E2 created and E1 abandoned. Given the PR's stated goal of idempotency/auditability, this is a real concern worth flagging. Medium severity. Actually, more direct: it doesn't even need the member to leave and re-enter. In the seeded flow, when the offboarding completes the flow may move members across stages? Hmm. But on_enter triggers once per entry. Fine. But wait — there's an even simpler reachable trigger: In the current logic the update path `updated` calls apply with onlyEmptyFields=true. On re-entry, metadata find event by eventId only when date matches. If date matches, event E1 located & fields not updated for non-empty fields. But date matches means nothing changed. So #4 deals with partial. I think the date-change duplicate case is a meaningful, non-overlapping consequence: **It violates the stated idempotency rule by creating a second pending event when the dismissal date changes after the first execution.** I'll report. **New comment 3 (service, notification/audit mismatch—partially overlapping #4?)** — skip. **New comment 4: Maybe something about `getOrCreateAssistantConversation` not being verified; skip. **New comment 5 (migration, low):** the `down()`+`up()` cycle duplicates active template (down() only deactivates the template and removes its seed marker; re-running `up()` can't find it and inserts a brand-new active template). This matters for idempotent rollback. Low. Is there a real migration concern that is more valuable: **The migration seeds templates and automations for companies whose workflow 'fluxo-de-saida' exists, but the YAML says the action is only available for offboarding with employee enters stage... Additionally, the seeded template will be created with `is_active=1` for companies that already have an active offboarding flow and thus will be listed as an extra "template" option; companies that don't use the "Fluxos de Saída" workflow at all aren't affected. OK. Actually, wait — Let me double-check something potentially important about the migration: In the template flow, the migration inserts `flow_automations` rows with both `trigger_type`/`action_type` deprecated fields AND `conditions`/`actions`. But is that the format actually created by the normal "new flow" creation code for these products? Let's compare with how an existing offboarding/onboarding template with automations gets persisted. The conditions for `on_enter` may be stored differently. However the seeds replicate the same shape used elsewhere? Look at SeedPayrollFlowTemplatesCommand to compare how they create automations with conditions/actions, especially `flow_template_id` NULL and stage_id. Let me read that file's relevant methods briefly to confirm shape, e.g., whether flow_automations rows for stages should reference `flow_template_id` as well. In the seed, they insert `flow_template_id NULL` and `fixed_stage_type NULL`. But the FlowAutomation entity says flowTemplate is ManyToOne nullable for fixed stage automations. When reading automations for a template, code may filter by flow_stage_id only, so flow_template_id null is fine for stage-level automations. I'll quickly scan SeedPayrollFlowTemplatesCommand for an insert into flow_automations to see the shape (they might use Doctrine entities rather than raw SQL).
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Command/SeedPayrollFlowTemplatesCommand.php"], "search_text": "flow_automations"}
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Command/SeedPayrollFlowTemplatesCommand.php"], "search_text": "new FlowAutomation"}
No matches found
Request #56 deepseek-v4-flash P:111.04K C:5.58K CR:110.98K CW:0 39883ms
Reasoning
The payroll seed command doesn't use FlowAutomation raw. The migration approach seeds raw inserts. Since the guard and manual tests passed, presumably valid. Let me stop and ensure I haven't missed anything big in the AutomationExecutionService's changes: Actually, wait. There's one more relevant observation regarding `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`: It calls `$this->executeNotify(...)` passing config `'to' => 'company_member'` etc. but the notify config for chat uses a hard-coded in-app NotificationCenter creation with `buttonUrl: '/chat?adriana=1'`. This is consistent. But more importantly: for the message to appear "no chat com a Adriana", the chat must be posted to the assistant conversation; requires the user to have an assistant conversation (created). This is handled by getOrCreateAssistantConversation. Now — is the message actually sent to the *recipient*? The chat target user = responsible's user. OK. Wait, there's a possibility that the responsible ISN'T the right reviewer for eSocial S-2299, but that's product. Let me now double-check whether `OffboardingMember.getReason()` and `getCompanyMember()` exist; findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember returns OffboardingMember. Yes. OK. Let me also scan the change in `src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php` (other changed files) — not in the review group; we can ignore per instructions (only review_files). We can't comment there. Let me review templates once more to ensure the label additions are in the right map keyed by type. Both diff hunks look correct. Now let's decide comments: 1. **Migration: `ensureWorkflowProduct` overwrites existing order_index to 0** (medium, maintainability/side effect). Provide suggestion: preserve existing order or skip update. 2. **Service: duplicate pending draft when dismissal date changes** (medium). Report as bug with suggestion to update existing draft in place when linked draft no longer matches or cancel old. 3. Possibly also: **Migration idempotency after `down()` then `up()`** (low). Might be too much of an edge; skip? But "migration deve ser idempotente (não falhar se rodada de novo)" — the migration is idempotent forward; down/up cycle edge is low value. Skip. Wait — should I report the fact that `up()` runs against all companies with the workflow regardless of the module being enabled? That's confirmed #1. skip. Another possible NEW finding about migration: `down()` executes `DELETE wp FROM workflow_products wp ...` referencing `flow_templates active_ft INNER JOIN flow_template_products active_ftp ...` in a NOT EXISTS subquery, and joins `flow_templates ft` with `WHERE ft.id = :templateId`. If the template was deleted (e.g., user deleted it before down), the subquery returns nothing; then the delete would delete the workflow_products row even if other templates were using the product? Let's parse: DELETE wp WHERE wp.product_id = :productId AND wp.workflow_id = (SELECT ft.workflow_id FROM flow_templates ft WHERE ft.id = :templateId) AND NOT EXISTS (other active templates in same workflow referencing the product). If templateId row does not exist (deleted), the subquery yields NULL -> wp.workflow_id = NULL -> no rows match; so nothing deleted. Actually `= (subquery returning no rows)` yields NULL, and `wp.workflow_id = NULL` is never true, so no rows deleted. Fine. Also the down() DELETE is only executed when `($settings['workflow_product_was_created'] ?? false) === true`. So safe. One more real candidate — **the migration's use of the same `TEMPLATE_NAME` but the `ensureTemplate` dedupe by seed; if a company already created a template with that name manually, they now get a second one. Minor. OK. Now think about whether to report anything about **`dateOrNull`** creating `\DateTime` without a timezone: not issue. **`decimalOrNull`** with input '10' returns '10.00' string via number_format — but DB decimal column expects numeric string; fine. With input '0'? number_format(0,2...) = '0.00'; numeric => fine. **`intOrNull`** returns int cast; but `setPensAlim` expects ?int and entity maps to integer column. OK. **`stringOrNull`** for numeroProcesso etc fine. **`cpfOrNull`** keeps digits; DB column length 11. If the CPF is >11 digits... they don't validate length; existing save uses sanitizeCPF too. **`dateOrNull`**: `new \DateTime($value)` where value = 'Y-m-d' => OK; but 'DD/MM/YYYY' formats parse incorrectly (would be interpreted as US format). Payload comes from config, likely 'Y-m-d' given build payload uses `$dismissalDate->format('Y-m-d')`. So not an issue. **Interesting nuance**: in `applyEsocialS2299Payload`, for the mapping of `pensAlim`, they used key `pensAlim` in payload, and in `buildPayload` they set `'pensAlim' => $config['pensAlim'] ?? ''`, matching `saveEventS2299` naming? `saveEventS2299` also reads `$data['pensAlim']`. Good. Now for the **notification subject/title includes 'Adriana' messages**; OK. Let me also reconsider a **security/cross-company issue** in `resolveEsocialS2299Responsible` config-driven ID: it verifies responsible->company == flowCompany. Good cross-tenant guard. In notification, they pass `company_member_id` = responsible from same company. Good. But — in `resolveRecipients` 'company_member' path, they look up CompanyMembers by ID from context with no company check; however config built internally. Fine. Now — the **event update `setDadosRemuneracao` when found via metadata (updated)**: same remuneration; good. Now let me also verify there's no **issue that the S-2299 events for `offboarding` might need `nrInscTransmissor` to reflect the eSocial transmitter (accounting/`contador`) rather than the company CNPJ**. Not verifiable; skip. Let me settle final comments (excluding confirmed findings): A) Migration `ensureWorkflowProduct` resets order index of existing rows to 0 for every affected company. Impact: data/configuration mutation of existing flows beyond seed creation. Suggest preserving existing order (only insert when missing, using the next available order index). Severity: medium (maintainability / data integrity), attach to `ensureWorkflowProduct` lines 137-143? Need the existing_code snippet from diff — must be from the added code lines exactly as in the diff. In the migration, added lines: ``` + private function ensureWorkflowProduct(int $workflowId, int $productId, int $orderIndex): void + { ... + if ($exists > 0) { + $this->connection->executeStatement( + 'UPDATE workflow_products SET order_index = :orderIndex WHERE id = :id', + ['orderIndex' => $orderIndex, 'id' => $exists] + ); + return; + } ``` The comment should target `'UPDATE workflow_products SET order_index = :orderIndex WHERE id = :id',` (newly added code). Provide snippet. B) Service duplicate draft when dismissal date changes. Target lines: ``` + $event = $this->findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal($company, $esocialTrabalhador, $remuneracao, $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate()); ``` Actually best anchor: `if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {` after that... The exact snippet from the diff added: `$event = $this->findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal($company, $esocialTrabalhador, $remuneracao, $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate());` Let me also reconsider whether this scenario is strong enough or overlaps with confirmed finding #3. #3 wording: "Quando já existe um rascunho pendente de S-2299 criado fora desta automação — por exemplo, salvo manualmente na aba de desligamento/eSocial do colaborador, que também grava com status pendente via saveEventS2299 — esta busca ignora eventos pendentes e a busca por sourceMetadata só encontra eve..." This is about a pendente event created externally. My scenario: the pending event was created by this automation (metadata-linked), but the dismissal date changed so the strict date match drops it and the code proceeds to the second search that filters out pendente, creating a second event. So both cases end with duplicate pendente events, but the cause is different (external creation vs internal draft with changed date). Given the confirmation list specifically frames #3 as external drafts, my finding is still distinct enough. But there is risk that reviewer sees it as a duplicate of the idempotency-family issue. Given "do not repeat" refers to those exact findings, and this is a different code path/cause, I think it's fair to report concisely. Let me also double-check: In the 'updated' flow — when eventStatus is 'updated', they persist and flush. When it's a re-run of the same draft, they set updatedAt and update only-empty fields; but the metadata updatedAt is set. Notification says updated. It is fine. Now, is the date-change re-entry actually reachable given the flow? Flow member in Etapa 3 may be manually moved back to an earlier stage (by responsible) then advanced again to Etapa 3, causing on_enter again. During stage 3, responsible reviews the S-2299 draft in the UI and could change the dismissal date in the offboarding (which is part of the draft), then need automation to re-run... Actually if the date changes while still in stage 3, the automation wouldn't re-run until re-entry. So the scenario of date change is limited to re-entry cycles. It's plausible but narrow. Maybe a stronger and more certain distinct issue: **the seeded automation config in the migration for `create_esocial_s2299_draft` uses `actionConfig` without a `responsible_id`** — but has `to: flow_responsible` config_preset. Actually action_config in the seed is only `{to, _default_automation_id}`; but since has_config false in the YAML, when the automation is created in the real flow UI with this action, the config contains just `to`. When executing, resolveEsocialS2299Responsible ignores 'to', and uses flow responsible from flow instance. So the "to: flow_responsible" presetting is meaningless; the responsible is resolved from the flow instance's flowResponsible. If the actual flow instance has no flowResponsible but the offboarding (Offboarding entity) has an offboarding flow responsible, they fall back to Offboarding getOffboardingFlowResponsible. OK. What if the flow instance responsible is a User not CompanyMembers? getFlowResponsible returns CompanyMembers? Probably. Alright. C) Possibly also report that the S-2299 automation has NO company/employee authorization but that's internal automation. Let me check one more possibly significant issue: **`executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` creates/updates the event and metadata with TWO separate flush calls, and only then sends notification. If notification sending throws (unlikely), the catch returns failure even though event & metadata persisted; partial state where the user will see "failure" but the draft exists.** Also the whole method catch on \Throwable wraps even the event flush and notification. If executeNotify fails after the event persists and flush, the catch returns ['success'=>false, 'error'], and the automation framework may log failure; but the event is already persisted (partial). Next run would find the draft (metadata stored) and go to 'updated' path, so eventually consistent. Not a blocker. Now also let me reconsider the **only-empty-fields update on `created`** is false — that's correct. Now, could there be a bug: in the metadata they store `'payload' => $payload` which includes `'member' => $companyMember->getId()` etc. fine. Now finalize the comment set. Possibly 2-3 new comments. Let me also verify the migration comment location lines precisely by reading the migration added lines to get exact snippet text: The snippet from the diff: ``` + if ($exists > 0) { + $this->connection->executeStatement( + 'UPDATE workflow_products SET order_index = :orderIndex WHERE id = :id', + ['orderIndex' => $orderIndex, 'id' => $exists] + ); + return; + } ``` Good. And for B snippet (in service diff): ``` + $event = $this->findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal($company, $esocialTrabalhador, $remuneracao, $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate()); ``` Let me make sure these lines exist exactly in the diff text: From diff: "+ $event = $this->findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal($company, $esocialTrabalhador, $remuneracao, $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate());" Yes present. Now, is there another finding about the **notification claiming update when only empty fields updated**? Already #4. Let me also think again about the possibility of a genuine **functional problem in the 'updated' path**: They found event by metadata (eventId) and status == 'pendente', date matches. Then set status 'updated' and updatedAt. But applyEsocialS2299Payload(onlyEmptyFields=true). If this is the first run after the migration-created draft was manually edited by the responsible in the UI (e.g., the responsible filled mtvDeslig in the official S-2299 form which saved to same event row), then re-running the automation updates only empty fields and doesn't clobber manual edits — good design (that's likely why onlyEmptyFields). Hmm, that's intentional: don't overwrite manual edits. OK. Another idea — **`findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal` picks any non-pendente event matching the same company/trabalhador/remuneracao/date, including events that may belong to a DIFFERENT offboarding/future dismissal (e.g., rehire and dismiss again). But it returns the most recent one. Fine. Now, potential issue in migration again: **`ensureOffboardingStages` returns early with `if ($stageId <= 0) continue;` but never re-checks that the template's stage automations' `flow_template_id` column is null; fine. Now, what about **the templates list_automations label changes** — trivial. Let me also check: The YAML uses `blocked_triggers` for `create_esocial_s2299_draft`. Do triggers on the flow config use the ids in the blocked list, e.g., 'offboarding_completed'... yes ids from same file. But note one missing allowed trigger? YAML says allowed only employee_enters_stage; blocked includes everything else except `employee_enters_stage`. Good. Time to finalize. Let me produce comments: 1. (Migration) — order_index overwrite side effect. Category: maintainability. Severity: medium. Wait, actually is there a possibility it's actually harmful: For companies whose workflow already contains offboarding plus other products arranged in some order (e.g., offboarding after onboarding within the same workflow, like a full exit flow with onboarding product? unlikely), overwriting to 0 changes the kanban order & which product is the flow's starting product. Since seeding only intends adding the new template, mutating existing workflow_products ordering is an unnecessary data change on existing customers' configurations — risk of regressions beyond the PR scope. medium. 2. (Service) — duplicate pendente draft on dismissal date change. category bug severity medium. Now — should we also mention that **the same apply only fills empty fields, but the event that is matched by the current date will never be updated when motivo changes**? Overlap with #4. skip. Maybe also consider reporting the event status message bug: When eventStatus = 'existing_not_editable' they do nothing but metadata eventStatus remains 'existing_not_editable'; good. Now consider a NEW **security/permission** consideration: the `my_company_member_manage` review URL is shared with the responsible via chat/email; if the responsible is not the member manager but an HR from another company? Flow responsible belongs to same company. OK. Let me also spot-check: `$offboardingMember->getOffboarding()?->getOffboardingFlowResponsible()` method exists in Offboarding entity (found). Good. Let me now also verify quickly that within migration `ensureOffboardingStages`, the stage3 automation trigger on_enter triggers only when entering the stage, but the flow template seed could conflict with existing flow template usage by existing active flows? No. I think final answer: 2 comments. Hmm, but the task expects that we scan all files. The migration file is fully reviewed; service reviewed. There are some issues already confirmed (5). We add these 2. Wait, is there another real issue worth flagging in the migration: **In up(), when a workflow has `company_id` not matching a company with active product but slug matches, they add a template to a company that may not have the offboarding product enabled at all.** #1 covers this broadly. skip. One more service issue: **`executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` catches `\Throwable` and returns an array; but AutomationExecutionService elsewhere expects specific error shapes? fine. Also — **`$config['system_sender'] ?? null` in emailConfig, but in executeSendEmail, does adding a null 'system_sender' key to emailConfig cause it to be merged into recipientContext and then into chat config 'system_sender' => null → filter_var(null) = false, no change. OK. One more potential important regression from the refactor: In `executeNotify`, previously `$emailConfig` didn't include `system_sender`; now null default. no behavior change. Now also confirm no duplicated comment: the confirmed #4 uses snippet `$this->applyEsocialS2299Payload($event, $payload, $eventStatus === 'updated');`. My service finding B uses a different snippet. Let me double check my finding B against code path — before create, findExisting... includes `->andWhere('event.status != :pendingStatus')`, so if the linked draft no longer matches context due to date change, it's invisible (since it's pendente) and thus a new event is created. Yes. Let me craft comments in Portuguese with required structure and format: Comment 1 content: "Ao garantir o vínculo produto-workflow, esta rotina sobrescreve a ordem do produto em linhas que já existiam (UPDATE ... SET order_index = 0), alterando a configuração atual de todos os fluxos de saída das empresas afetadas — um efeito colateral de dados que não é necessário para semear o template. Em fluxos com mais de um produto, isso pode reordenar colunas/etapas existentes e gerar regressão fora do escopo da PR. Ajuste para preservar o order_index existente e só definir a ordem na inserção de linha nova." Comment 2 content: "Se a data de desligamento do offboarding mudar depois que o rascunho pendente foi criado por esta automação, a busca pelo rascunho via metadados falha (a data não bate mais) e a busca seguinte ignora eventos pendentes (filtra status != 'pendente'). O resultado é a criação de um segundo rascunho pendente, deixando o anterior abandonado — duplicando eventos S-2299 para o mesmo colaborador, o que contraria a regra de idempotência declarada. Sugiro localizar o rascunho pendente vinculado ao colaborador sem exigir a data, atualizando os campos no lugar (ou inativando o antigo) em vez de criar um novo." I should include details after simple explanation. Also severity medium. Let me choose anchors: For migration comment, snippet must be from added code. The lines added in the migration are inside `ensureWorkflowProduct`. Provide existing_code snippet exactly matching diff. It's added code, good. Now — verify those snippets are "newly added lines" (plus lines) in the diff. Yes. Now, let me think about whether comment 1's severity should be low given 'fluxo-de-saida' workflow likely only contains offboarding product. Still, the overwrite is gratuitous data mutation; medium is fine but could be "low". I'll choose low/medium... For impact possibly real config change. I'll go medium for the migration ordering? Let me choose severity "medium"? Actually, in terms of code review: If it's just harmless reordering when no other product exists, it's a low. But there is no business justification to update order_index for an existing row, and migrations should be conservative. I'll set severity low for the ordering side-effect. Wait, actually, does order_index = 0 for the offboarding product in 'fluxo-de-saida' maybe also used to rank products for the flow creation UI and might be required for the template flow to place it first? If they want the seeded template to be primary... eh. In any case, preserving the existing value would be safer. Keep low severity. Comment 2 severity medium (or high?). Idempotency bug causing duplicate pending eSocial events could cause data integrity problems, but scenario is narrow (re-entry after date change). I'll set medium. Let me write both comments now. Then task_done. Also ensure that comments in pt-BR and mention existing_code anchors. For migration comment, anchor: ``` if ($exists > 0) { $this->connection->executeStatement( 'UPDATE workflow_products SET order_index = :orderIndex WHERE id = :id', ``` Actually the content should include the exact lines as in diff. The diff shows: + if ($exists > 0) { + $this->connection->executeStatement( + 'UPDATE workflow_products SET order_index = :orderIndex WHERE id = :id', + ['orderIndex' => $orderIndex, 'id' => $exists] + ); + return; + } I'll use existing_code with these plus-lines; the matching algorithm will find the location. For service comment B anchor: ``` $event = $this->findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal($company, $esocialTrabalhador, $remuneracao, $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate()); ``` It's plus line. Let me finalize.
Tool Calls (1)
code_comment
Show Details
{"comments": [{"content": "Para empresas que já usam o fluxo de saída, esta rotina sobrescreve a ordem atual do produto offboarding (UPDATE ... SET order_index = 0) mesmo quando a linha de vínculo produto-workflow já existia antes da migration. Isso altera a configuração corrente desses fluxos sem necessidade para semear o template — em fluxos com mais de um produto pode reordenar etapas/colunas e causar regressão fora do escopo da PR. Sugiro preservar o order_index existente e atribuir a ordem apenas na inserção de linha nova.", "existing_code": "        if ($exists > 0) {\n            $this->connection->executeStatement(\n                'UPDATE workflow_products SET order_index = :orderIndex WHERE id = :id',\n                ['orderIndex' => $orderIndex, 'id' => $exists]\n            );\n            return;\n        }", "category": "maintainability", "severity": "low", "path": "migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php"}, {"content": "Se a data de desligamento do offboarding mudar depois que o rascunho pendente foi criado por esta própria automação, o rascunho antigo não é mais encontrado: a busca pelo evento via metadados compara a data e falha, e a busca seguinte ignora eventos pendentes (filtro status != 'pendente'). O resultado é a criação de um segundo rascunho pendente, deixando o anterior órfão e duplicando eventos S-2299 para o mesmo colaborador — exatamente o que a regra de idempotência declarada na PR queria evitar. Sugiro localizar o rascunho pendente vinculado ao colaborador sem depender da data, atualizando os campos no lugar (ou inativando o antigo) quando a data for alterada.", "existing_code": "                        $event = $this->findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal($company, $esocialTrabalhador, $remuneracao, $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate());", "category": "bug", "severity": "medium", "path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"}]}
(async)
Request #57 deepseek-v4-flash P:116.64K C:188 CR:116.61K CW:0 2629ms
Reasoning
Let me do a final quick scan on the two twig files and yaml to confirm no issues not yet noted. The additions are simple label map additions in JS dictionaries. No XSS or logic. YAML action keys look correct and consistent with siblings. Given the task requires each file pass, I have reviewed: - config/automations/offboarding.yaml: reviewed; no new issues. - Migration: reviewed; reported order_index side effect; confirmed findings #1 covers module check. - AutomationExecutionService: reviewed; new comment on date-change duplication; confirmed findings #2-5. - twig files: reviewed; simple label additions; no issues. Let me now call task_done.
Tool Calls (1)
task_done
Show Details
{"state": "DONE"}

memory_compression_task

Request #1 43284ms Error
Error Detail
error reading response body: context canceled

review_filter_task

Request #1 deepseek-v4-flash P:16.89K C:1.4K CR:1.92K CW:0 11422ms
Reasoning
Let me analyze the review comments. The comments are c-0 through c-4. Let me consider each: c-0: Migration seeds product/template/automations for all companies with `fluxo-de-saida` workflow, without checking if each company has offboarding module enabled. This is a behavioral/compatibility concern. The subject... Actually this is about migration behavior. Is it protected? Hmm, it's about business semantics and eligibility. The comment says the migration doesn't filter by company feature. Looking at the diff, the migration does indeed fetch all workflows with slug = fluxo-de-saida and seed each without feature checks. That's accurate per the diff. Not a factually wrong claim - the code shown doesn't check features. Approve. Actually wait - the comment is really a design concern about whether the seed should be global. The diff shows the code seeds globally. So the claim "sem verificar se cada empresa tem o módulo offboarding habilitado" is true of the diff. Approve. c-1: Concern about code duplication, god object, suggesting extraction. This is about architecture/maintainability. Is it factually wrong? The comment claims `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::saveEventS2299` exists with same setters. I cannot verify that from the diff (repository not in diff). The claim about duplication cannot be proven wrong from the diff. Approve. c-2: Claims that when an existing pending S-2299 draft created outside this automation exists (saved manually with status `pendente`), this search ignores pending events and only finds events via sourceMetadata created by this automation, so action creates a second pending event. Look at code: `findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal` uses `event.status != :pendingStatus`. And `findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding` looks at sourceMetadata. Hmm. Actually wait - the code first checks `findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding` which returns the event if found and status != pendente → existing_not_editable, else status pendente → updated. If event is pendente from own automation, it updates. Then findExisting... for status != pendente. Actually let me trace: The comment claims duplicates may be created. This is runtime behavior reasoning about a scenario not fully visible (manual saves via saveEventS2299 status pendente). Actually wait, is this a memory safety / concurrency / behavioral subject? It's about idempotency/duplicate event creation - a behavioral concern. Hmm, "behavioral or compatibility change" protected subject? The protected subject is about a message/field/status/default that old code produced and new code no longer does. This comment is about new code behavior causing duplicates. It's a correctness concern in new code. But the question is whether the diff proves the comment wrong. Ground B requires a diff line literally contradicting the central claim. The claim: search ignores pending events and could create duplicates. Actually the code does exclude pending events in `findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal`. But whether a duplicate actually gets created depends on many things not fully visible. I can't prove the comment wrong. Approve. Hmm wait, is the comment factually wrong? It says the search ignores pending events, which is literally true from the diff (`event.status != :pendingStatus`). The consequence (duplicate creation) is an inference. Not provable wrong. Approve. c-3: On re-execution (pending event already located), payload only fills empty fields (`onlyEmptyFields = true`). If dismissal date or other data changes after first execution, the draft keeps old value while notification says "updated". This claims that when `$eventStatus === 'updated'`, applyEsocialS2299Payload is called with onlyEmptyFields=true, which happens because the event found via sourceMetadata is pendente and it goes to `elseif ($event instanceof ...) { event->setUpdatedAt; eventStatus='updated'; }` then `if ($eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable') { ... applyEsocialS2299Payload($event, $payload, $eventStatus === 'updated'); }`. So on 'updated', only empty fields are filled. That is literally what the code shows. And the notification message for 'updated' says "foi atualizado a partir do offboarding". So the claim is accurate regarding the code. Whether this constitutes a real problem is a judgment. Not factually wrong. Approve. c-4: No automated tests for new business logic; the only test change in the PR is a name/field adjustment in an unrelated SSMA test. Hmm - is there any test file in the diff? No test files present in the diff group. The comment references a test change "desta PR" that isn't in the diff. But the diff provided may be partial; the Agent saw full codebase. The claim "não tem teste automatizado" — can't verify, and absence of tests in the diff isn't proof. The comment mentions "a única mudança em testes desta PR é um ajuste de nome/campo num teste de SSMA não relacionado" — that test change isn't in these diffs. Can't prove wrong. Approve. So all should be approved. Let me double check whether any comment targets protected subject or is factually wrong. Actually, let me reconsider c-2 and c-3 more carefully. Are they protected? c-3 is about the logic that on re-execution, only empty fields are filled. Hmm this relates to data consistency. Not a protected category per se. But anyway not provably wrong. Let me verify c-2's claim more carefully against the code. The scenario: "Quando já existe um rascunho pendente de S-2299 criado fora desta automação". The code path: `findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding` checks sourceMetadata (only events created by automation). If none, goes to `findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal` which excludes pending. If none found, creates new event with status pendente. So yes if there's a pending event not in sourceMetadata, a second pending event would be created. This matches the code. Whether it's a real problem in practice depends on whether manual saves create pending events - that's outside the diff. Not provably wrong. So approve all. The answer is approve_all_comments.
Tool Calls (1)
approve_all_comments
Show Details
{}
Request #2 deepseek-v4-flash P:16.1K C:1.08K CR:9.73K CW:0 7670ms
Reasoning
Let me analyze the two comments. c-0 targets `migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php`. The comment says: "Para empresas que já usam o fluxo de saída, esta rotina sobrescreve a ordem atual do produto offboarding (UPDATE ... SET order_index = 0) mesmo quando a linha de vínculo produto-workflow já existia antes da migration." Wait, the comment quotes the code in `ensureWorkflowProduct`: ``` if ($exists > 0) { $this->connection->executeStatement( 'UPDATE workflow_products SET order_index = :orderIndex WHERE id = :id', ['orderIndex' => $orderIndex, 'id' => $exists] ); return; } ``` And this is called with `$this->ensureWorkflowProduct($workflowId, $offboardingProductId, 0);` — the orderIndex is 0. So yes, this updates the order_index to 0 even when the row already existed. The comment's claim is factually accurate based on the diff. This is a behavioral change / concern but it's factually correct per the diff. Is it in the subject file? Yes, `ensureWorkflowProduct` exists in the migration file. So Ground A doesn't apply. Ground B - is there a line that literally contradicts? No. The claim is that the routine overwrites the existing order_index to 0 even when row existed. The diff indeed shows UPDATE ... SET order_index = :orderIndex with orderIndex 0. So the comment is correct. Approve. c-1 targets `src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php`. The comment describes behavior when dismissal date changes after a pending draft was created. It references `findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal` which filters `status != 'pendente'`. The comment claims that when the dismissal date changes, the metadata search fails (because it compares date), and the subsequent search ignores pending events, creating a second pending draft. This is a runtime-behavior reasoning comment. It's about behavioral concerns/idempotency. Is it a protected subject? Behavioral change? It's more of a logic concern, not exactly a protected category. Let me check the actual code. The subject file's diff contains `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, `findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding`, `findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal`, etc. These are in the diff. So Ground A doesn't apply. Ground B - is there a diff line that literally contradicts the comment's central claim? The central claim is about what happens when the dismissal date changes. The code shown: metadata search matches event context including dismissal date comparison. `findEsocialS2299EventMatchesContext` compares dismissal date. So if the dismissal date changed, metadata search returns null. Then `findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal` filters `status != 'pendente'`. So pending events are skipped... wait, but the pending draft created by this automation would have status 'pendente', which the query excludes. Actually wait — is that right? The comment says the created event has status 'pendente'. Yes, `createEsocialS2299DraftEvent` sets status 'pendente'. And the find query excludes 'pendente'. Hmm, so the first branch that runs for the newly-created event... let me trace. Actually the concern is a logic reasoning one. I can't fully verify without more code. It requires a chain of reasoning. The code in the diff does seem consistent with the claim: metadata search compares date, and fallback search excludes pending events. This is not a protected subject in the veto list necessarily... Actually is it a behavioral change? No, it's a claim about a bug in new code behavior. The comment is about runtime behavior. The instructions say "The comment reasons about runtime behavior, business semantics, or code in files you cannot see. The Agent had access you do not." — so approve. Neither comment meets Ground A or Ground B. The default is approve everything. Let me double-check c-1 more carefully for any literal contradiction. The comment claims the fallback "ignora eventos pendentes (filtro status != 'pendente')". Indeed the query has `->andWhere('event.status != :pendingStatus')` with pendingStatus 'pendente'. Correct. The claim about metadata comparison failing: `esocialS2299EventMatchesContext` compares dismissal dates. Correct. So no contradiction. Approve. c-0: claim: the routine overwrites order_index even when row already existed before migration. In `up()`: `$workflowProductExisted = $this->workflowProductExists(...); $this->ensureWorkflowProduct($workflowId, $offboardingProductId, 0);` and ensureWorkflowProduct does UPDATE when exists. Correct. No contradiction. Approve. So approve all.
Tool Calls (1)
approve_all_comments
Show Details
{}
src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php,templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig,tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php 22 requests

main_task

Request #1 deepseek-v4-flash P:12.06K C:500 CR:2.69K CW:0 3661ms
Reasoning
Let me analyze the three files in the review group. 1. `src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php` - Changing `getPercAliment`/`setPercAliment` and `getVrAlim`/`setVrAlim` types from `?int` to `?string`. I need to check if there's a column mapping (ORM) - if the entity property was declared as `int` in column type and now setter/getter return string, there might be a type mismatch with the database column type or with the ORM mapping. Let me read the entity file to see the property declarations and column mappings. 2. `templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig` - changing `prevEvts.desligamento` to `prevEvts.termino` for the null check. This seems like a bug fix. Need to check whether `prevEvts.termino` exists always. The condition checks `prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab`. This is fine as long as termino property exists. 3. `tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php` - renamed test and added `descaracter_suspect => '1'`. Need to check the validator logic to understand. Since it's a test addition. Let me read files for context. First, let me examine the entity file.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php", "start_line": 1, "end_line": 260}
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php (Total lines: 335)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-260
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Entity;
4|
5|use App\Repository\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository;
6|use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
7|
8|/**
9| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass=EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::class)
10| */
11|class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento extends EsocialEvents
12|{
13|    /**
14|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="EsocialDadosTrabalhador")
15|     * @ORM\JoinColumn(name="esocial_dados_trabalhador_id", referencedColumnName="id", nullable=false)
16|     */
17|    private $esocialTrabalhador;
18|
19|    /**
20|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=2, nullable=true)
21|     */
22|    private $mtvDeslig;
23|
24|    /**
25|     * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
26|     */
27|    private $dtDeslig;
28|
29|    /**
30|     * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
31|     */
32|    private $dtAvPrv;
33|
34|    /**
35|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=1, nullable=true)
36|     */
37|    private $indPagtoApi;
38|
39|    /**
40|     * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
41|     */
42|    private $dtProjFimApi;
43|
44|    /**
45|     * @ORM\Column(type="integer", nullable=true)
46|     */
47|    private $pensAlim;
48|
49|    /**
50|     * @ORM\Column(type="decimal", precision=10, scale=2, nullable=true)
51|     */
52|    private $percAliment;
53|
54|    /**
55|     * @ORM\Column(type="decimal", precision=10, scale=2, nullable=true)
56|     */
57|    private $vrAlim;
58|
59|    /**
60|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=20, nullable=true)
61|     */
62|    private $nrProcTrab;
63|
64|    /**
65|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=1, nullable=true)
66|     */
67|    private $indPdv;
68|
69|    /**
70|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=11, nullable=true)
71|     */
72|    private $cpfSubstituto;
73|
74|    /**
75|     * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
76|     */
77|    private $dtNascto;
78|
79|    /**
80|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=11, nullable=true)
81|     */
82|    private $novoCpf;
83|
84|    /**
85|     * @ORM\Column(type="integer", nullable=true)
86|     */
87|    private $indRemun;
88|
89|    /**
90|     * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
91|     */
92|    private $dtFimRemun;
93|
94|    /**
95|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=5, nullable=true)
96|     */
97|    private $insConsig;
98|
99|    /**
100|     * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=40, nullable=true)
101|     */
102|    private $nrContr;
103|
104|    /**
105|     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity=EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class, )
106|     * @ORM\JoinColumn(nullable=false)
107|     */
108|    private $dadosRemuneracao;
109|
110|    public function getDadosRemuneracao(): ?EsocialDadosRemuneracao
111|    {
112|        return $this->dadosRemuneracao;
113|    }
114|
115|    public function setDadosRemuneracao(?EsocialDadosRemuneracao $dadosRemuneracao): self
116|    {
117|        $this->dadosRemuneracao = $dadosRemuneracao;
118|
119|        return $this;
120|    }
121|
122|    public function getEsocialTrabalhador()
123|    {
124|        return $this->esocialTrabalhador;
125|    }
126|
127|    public function setEsocialTrabalhador(?EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador): void
128|    {
129|        $this->esocialTrabalhador = $esocialTrabalhador;
130|    }
131|
132|    public function getMtvDeslig(): ?string
133|    {
134|        return $this->mtvDeslig;
135|    }
136|
137|    public function setMtvDeslig(?string $mtvDeslig): self
138|    {
139|        $this->mtvDeslig = $mtvDeslig;
140|
141|        return $this;
142|    }
143|
144|    public function getDtDeslig(): ?\DateTimeInterface
145|    {
146|        return $this->dtDeslig;
147|    }
148|
149|    public function setDtDeslig(?\DateTimeInterface $dtDeslig): self
150|    {
151|        $this->dtDeslig = $dtDeslig;
152|
153|        return $this;
154|    }
155|
156|    public function getDtAvPrv(): ?\DateTimeInterface
157|    {
158|        return $this->dtAvPrv;
159|    }
160|
161|    public function setDtAvPrv(?\DateTimeInterface $dtAvPrv): self
162|    {
163|        $this->dtAvPrv = $dtAvPrv;
164|
165|        return $this;
166|    }
167|
168|    public function getIndPagtoApi(): ?string
169|    {
170|        return $this->indPagtoApi;
171|    }
172|
173|    public function setIndPagtoApi(?string $indPagtoApi): self
174|    {
175|        $this->indPagtoApi = $indPagtoApi;
176|
177|        return $this;
178|    }
179|
180|    public function getDtProjFimApi(): ?\DateTimeInterface
181|    {
182|        return $this->dtProjFimApi;
183|    }
184|
185|    public function setDtProjFimApi(?\DateTimeInterface $dtProjFimApi): self
186|    {
187|        $this->dtProjFimApi = $dtProjFimApi;
188|
189|        return $this;
190|    }
191|
192|    public function getPensAlim(): ?int
193|    {
194|        return $this->pensAlim;
195|    }
196|
197|    public function setPensAlim(?int $pensAlim): self
198|    {
199|        $this->pensAlim = $pensAlim;
200|
201|        return $this;
202|    }
203|
204|    public function getPercAliment(): ?string
205|    {
206|        return $this->percAliment;
207|    }
208|
209|    public function setPercAliment(?string $percAliment): self
210|    {
211|        $this->percAliment = $percAliment;
212|
213|        return $this;
214|    }
215|
216|    public function getVrAlim(): ?string
217|    {
218|        return $this->vrAlim;
219|    }
220|
221|    public function setVrAlim(?string $vrAlim): self
222|    {
223|        $this->vrAlim = $vrAlim;
224|
225|        return $this;
226|    }
227|
228|    public function getNrProcTrab(): ?string
229|    {
230|        return $this->nrProcTrab;
231|    }
232|
233|    public function setNrProcTrab(?string $nrProcTrab): self
234|    {
235|        $this->nrProcTrab = $nrProcTrab;
236|
237|        return $this;
238|    }
239|
240|    public function getIndPdv(): ?string
241|    {
242|        return $this->indPdv;
243|    }
244|
245|    public function setIndPdv(?string $indPdv): self
246|    {
247|        $this->indPdv = $indPdv;
248|
249|        return $this;
250|    }
251|
252|    public function getCpfSubstituto(): ?string
253|    {
254|        return $this->cpfSubstituto;
255|    }
256|
257|    public function setCpfSubstituto(?string $cpfSubstituto): self
258|    {
259|        $this->cpfSubstituto = $cpfSubstituto;
260|
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig", "start_line": 1, "end_line": 140}
File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig (Total lines: 124)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-124
1|<section id="termino-motivo-desligamento" class="dynamic-termino-section" style="display: none;">
2|    <form>
3|        <h5>Motivo do Desligamento</h5>
4|        <p class="card-description">
5|            Informe os dados relacionados ao motivo do desligamento ou término do trabalhador.
6|        </p>
7|        <div class="row">
8|            <!-- Motivo do Desligamento -->
9|<div class="col-md-6 mb-3">
10|    <label for="termino-motivoDesligamento">Motivo do Desligamento <span class="text-danger">*</span></label>
11|    <select class="form-control" id="termino-motivoDesligamento" name="termino-motivoDesligamento" required>
12|        <option value="" selected disabled>Selecione um motivo</option>
13|        <option value="01"
14|            {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '01' %}
15|                selected
16|            {% endif %}>
17|            01 - Exoneração do diretor não empregado sem justa causa
18|        </option>
19|        <option value="02"
20|            {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '02' %}
21|                selected
22|            {% endif %}>
23|            02 - Término de mandato do diretor não empregado não reconduzido
24|        </option>
25|        <option value="03"
26|            {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '03' %}
27|                selected
28|            {% endif %}>
29|            03 - Exoneração a pedido de diretor não empregado
30|        </option>
31|        <option value="04"
32|            {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '04' %}
33|                selected
34|            {% endif %}>
35|            04 - Exoneração do diretor não empregado por culpa recíproca ou força maior
36|        </option>
37|        <option value="05"
38|            {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '05' %}
39|                selected
40|            {% endif %}>
41|            05 - Morte do diretor não empregado
42|        </option>
43|        <option value="06"
44|            {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '06' %}
45|                selected
46|            {% endif %}>
47|            06 - Exoneração por falência ou encerramento
48|        </option>
49|        <option value="07"
50|            {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '07' %}
51|                selected
52|            {% endif %}>
53|            07 - Mudança de CPF
54|        </option>
55|        <option value="99"
56|            {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '99' %}
57|                selected
58|            {% endif %}>
59|            99 - Outros
60|        </option>
61|    </select>
62|    <small class="form-text text-muted">
63|        Selecione o código conforme a Tabela 19 do eSocial.
64|    </small>
65|</div>
66|
67|
68|
69|            
70|            
71|                <!-- Data do Término -->
72|                <div class="col-md-6 mb-3">
73|                    <label for="termino-dataTermino">Data do Término <span class="text-danger">*</span></label>
74|                    <input 
75|                        type="date" 
76|                        id="termino-dataTermino" 
77|                        name="termino-dataTermino" 
78|                        class="form-control" 
79|                        required
80|                        placeholder="Selecione a data do término"
81|                        value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.dtTerm %}{{ prevEvts.termino.dtTerm|date('Y-m-d') }}{% endif %}">
82|                    <small class="form-text text-muted">
83|                        Último dia trabalhado. Deve ser igual ou anterior à data atual + 10 dias.
84|                    </small>
85|                </div>
86|
87|
88|
89|            <!-- Número Processo Trabalhista -->
90|            <div class="col-md-6 mb-3">
91|                    <label for="termino-numeroProcesso">Número Processo Trabalhista</label>
92|                    <input 
93|                        type="text" 
94|                        id="termino-numeroProcesso" 
95|                        name="termino-numeroProcesso" 
96|                        class="form-control" 
97|                        maxlength="20" 
98|                        placeholder="Informe o número do processo trabalhista"
99|                        value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab %}{{ prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab }}{% endif %}">
100|                    <small class="form-text text-muted">
101|                        Número que identifica o processo trabalhista (opcional).
102|                    </small>
103|                </div>
104|</div>
105|
106|     <div id="buttons-container" class="mt-4"></div>
107|    </form>
108|</section>
109|
110|<script>
111|    document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", () => {
112|        const dateField = document.getElementById("termino-dataTermino");
113|
114|        if (dateField) {
115|            const today = new Date();
116|            const maxDate = new Date(today);
117|            maxDate.setDate(today.getDate() + 10);
118|
119|            const formattedMaxDate = maxDate.toISOString().split("T")[0]; // Formata para AAAA-MM-DD
120|            dateField.setAttribute("max", formattedMaxDate); // Define o atributo max dinamicamente
121|        }
122|    });
123|</script>
124|
Request #2 deepseek-v4-flash P:16.24K C:439 CR:12.54K CW:0 3447ms
Reasoning
Let me look at the entity in more detail. The `percAliment` and `vrAlim` columns are typed as `decimal(precision=10, scale=2, nullable=true)`. Doctrine decimal columns return strings in PHP. So the getter/setter previously used `?int` which was actually wrong—Doctrine returns string for decimal. Changing to `?string` aligns with Doctrine decimal handling. That seems like a fix. But we should verify callers of `getPercAliment`, `setPercAliment`, `getVrAlim`, `setVrAlim` to see if any code relies on int behavior or does arithmetic on the value, which would break if values are strings. Actually the change from int to string might break callers who do arithmetic. But the field was already decimal in DB. Previously getter returning int when doctrine returns string would be a type issue. Hmm, but in the codebase, entities are usually persisted and rehydrated. When Doctrine hydrates, it calls setter? Actually, Doctrine hydrates by reflection property directly (in modern versions, or via setter when configured). Regardless, the declared return type may matter. Let me search for usages of these methods. Also check whether there might be a scenario where code compares `percAliment` numerically. Search. Let's also look at AutomationExecutionService changes since it's related, but it's not in review group. Yet context matters for entity usage. The new automation code that calls `setPercAliment(...)` — wait, but that file is not in the review group. We can still check references for the entity methods. Let me search for percAliment, vrAlim usages.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "PercAliment"}
File: docs/Flowable/Tasks/formatters/esocial_s1200_campos_disponiveis.md
Match lines: 1
210|      "percAliment": 50.00,

File: docs/Flowable/Tasks/formatters/esocial_s2299_campos_disponiveis.md
Match lines: 5
37|| `percAliment` | decimal | Percentual de pensão alimentícia | Não | 30.00 |
226|| `percAliment` | double | global | Percentual de pensão alimentícia |
355|4. **Pensão Alimentícia**: Os campos `pensAlim`, `percAliment` e `vrAlim` são usados quando há pensão alimentícia relacionada ao desligamento.
392|18. **Valores Numéricos**: Os campos numéricos (`pensAlim`, `percAliment`, `vrAlim`, `indRemun`) são retornados como inteiros ou decimais conforme o tipo, ou `0`/`0.0` se não disponíveis.
430|// - percAliment: 30.00

File: docs/Flowable/Tasks/formatters/esocial_s2399_campos_disponiveis.md
Match lines: 5
34|| `percAliment` | decimal | Percentual de pensão alimentícia | Não | 30.00 |
205|| `percAliment` | double | global | Percentual de pensão alimentícia |
323|3. **Pensão Alimentícia**: Os campos `pensAlim`, `percAliment` e `vrAlim` são usados quando há pensão alimentícia relacionada ao término do TSV. O campo `pensAlim` indica o tipo de pensão alimentícia:
361|16. **Valores Numéricos**: Os campos numéricos (`pensAlim`, `percAliment`, `vrAlim`, `indRemun`) são retornados como inteiros ou decimais conforme o tipo, ou `0`/`0.0` se não disponíveis.
397|// - percAliment: 30.00

File: docs/Flowable/Tasks/formatters/esocial_termination_events_campos_disponiveis.md
Match lines: 8
61|| `percAliment` | decimal | Percentual de pensão alimentícia | Não | 30.00 |
74|| `percAliment` | decimal | Percentual de pensão alimentícia | Não | 30.00 |
253|//       "percAliment": null,
277|//       "percAliment": 30.00,
315|    "percAliment": null,
339|    "percAliment": 30.00,
379|      "percAliment": null,
403|      "percAliment": 30.00,

File: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
Match lines: 5
52|    private $percAliment;
204|    public function getPercAliment(): ?string
206|        return $this->percAliment;
209|    public function setPercAliment(?string $percAliment): self
211|        $this->percAliment = $percAliment;

File: src/Entity/EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino.php
Match lines: 5
31|    private $percAliment;
112|    public function getPercAliment(): ?int
114|        return $this->percAliment;
117|    public function setPercAliment(?int $percAliment): self
119|        $this->percAliment = $percAliment;

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
Match lines: 2
81|        $event->setPercAliment($data['percAliment'] ?? null);
122|            'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2399EvtTsvTerminoRepository.php
Match lines: 2
78|        $event->setPercAliment($data['percentualPensao']);
109|            'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),

File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 2
15153|            'percAliment' => $config['percAliment'] ?? '',
15289|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getPercAliment(), fn ($value) => $event->setPercAliment($value), $this->decimalOrNull($payload['percAliment'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);

File: src/Service/ESocialDataService.php
Match lines: 2
1078|        $std->percaliment = $evento->getPercAliment();
1330|        $std->percaliment = $evento->getPercAliment();

File: src/Service/FlowableServices/FlowableVariablesService.php
Match lines: 4
15208|            $this->formatter->formatDouble('percAliment', $eventData['percAliment'] ?? 0.0, 'global'),
15284|            $this->formatter->formatDouble('percAliment', $eventData['percAliment'] ?? 0.0, 'global'),
19737|                'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),
19792|                'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/jsonSchemes/v_S_01_00_00/evtDeslig.schema
Match lines: 1
69|        "percaliment": {

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/jsonSchemes/v_S_01_00_00/evtTSVTermino.schema
Match lines: 1
60|        "percaliment": {

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/jsonSchemes/v_S_01_01_00/evtDeslig.schema
Match lines: 1
69|        "percaliment": {

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/jsonSchemes/v_S_01_01_00/evtTSVTermino.schema
Match lines: 1
60|        "percaliment": {

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/jsonSchemes/v_S_01_02_00/evtDeslig.schema
Match lines: 1
69|        "percaliment": {

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/jsonSchemes/v_S_01_02_00/evtProcTrab.schema
Match lines: 1
350|                                            "percaliment": {

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/jsonSchemes/v_S_01_02_00/evtTSVTermino.schema
Match lines: 1
60|        "percaliment": {

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_00_00/evtDeslig.xsd
Match lines: 1
90|                                        <xs:element name="percAliment" minOccurs="0" type="TS_percAliment" />

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_00_00/evtTSVTermino.xsd
Match lines: 1
106|                                        <xs:element name="percAliment" minOccurs="0" type="TS_percAliment" />

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_00_00/tipos.xsd
Match lines: 2
3096|    <!-- Campo {percAliment} -->
3098|    <xs:simpleType name="TS_percAliment">

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_01_00/evtDeslig.xsd
Match lines: 1
92|                                        <xs:element name="percAliment" minOccurs="0" type="TS_percAliment" />

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_01_00/evtTSVTermino.xsd
Match lines: 1
108|                                        <xs:element name="percAliment" minOccurs="0" type="TS_percAliment" />

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_01_00/tipos.xsd
Match lines: 2
3330|    <!-- Campo {percAliment} -->
3332|    <xs:simpleType name="TS_percAliment">

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_02_00/evtDeslig.xsd
Match lines: 1
93|                                        <xs:element name="percAliment" minOccurs="0" type="TS_percAliment" />

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_02_00/evtProcTrab.xsd
Match lines: 1
565|                                                                                        <xs:element name="percAliment" minOccurs="0" type="TS_percAliment" />

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_02_00/evtTSVTermino.xsd
Match lines: 1
109|                                        <xs:element name="percAliment" minOccurs="0" type="TS_percAliment" />

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_02_00/tipos.xsd
Match lines: 2
3905|    <!-- Campo {percAliment} -->
3907|    <xs:simpleType name="TS_percAliment">

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_03_00/evtDeslig.xsd
Match lines: 1
93|                                        <xs:element name="percAliment" minOccurs="0" type="TS_percAliment" />

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_03_00/evtProcTrab.xsd
Match lines: 1
577|                                                                                        <xs:element name="percAliment" minOccurs="0" type="TS_percAliment" />

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_03_00/evtTSVTermino.xsd
Match lines: 1
109|                                        <xs:element name="percAliment" minOccurs="0" type="TS_percAliment" />

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_03_00/tipos.xsd
Match lines: 2
3977|    <!-- Campo {percAliment} -->
3979|    <xs:simpleType name="TS_percAliment">

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/src/Factories/Traits/TraitS2299.php
Match lines: 8
106|            "percAliment",
107|            !empty($this->std->percaliment) ? $this->std->percaliment : null,
619|            "percAliment",
620|            !empty($this->std->percaliment) ? $this->std->percaliment : null,
1138|            "percAliment",
1139|            !empty($this->std->percaliment) ? $this->std->percaliment : null,
1669|            "percAliment",
1670|            !empty($this->std->percaliment) ? $this->std->percaliment : null,

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/src/Factories/Traits/TraitS2399.php
Match lines: 6
88|            "percAliment",
89|            !empty($this->std->percaliment) ? $this->std->percaliment : null,
367|            "percAliment",
368|            !empty($this->std->percaliment) ? $this->std->percaliment : null,
656|            "percAliment",
657|            !empty($this->std->percaliment) ? $this->std->percaliment : null,

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/src/Factories/Traits/TraitS2500.php
Match lines: 2
1036|                        "percAliment",
1037|                        $des->percaliment ?? null,

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial/desligamento.html.twig
Match lines: 1
251|        percAliment: document.getElementById("percentualPensao")?.value || "",

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_desligamento/pensao_alimenticia.html.twig
Match lines: 1
48|                    value="{% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.percAliment %}{{ prevEvts.desligamento.percAliment }}{% endif %}">

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/pensao_alimenticia.html.twig
Match lines: 1
58|                    value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.percAliment %}{{ prevEvts.termino.percAliment }}{% endif %}"

File: tests/ESocialS2299EventTest.php
Match lines: 1
70|        $this->std->percaliment = null;

code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "VrAlim"}
File: docs/Flowable/Tasks/formatters/esocial_s1200_campos_disponiveis.md
Match lines: 1
211|      "vrAlim": 500.00

File: docs/Flowable/Tasks/formatters/esocial_s2299_campos_disponiveis.md
Match lines: 5
38|| `vrAlim` | decimal | Valor da pensão alimentícia | Não | 1500.00 |
227|| `vrAlim` | double | global | Valor da pensão alimentícia |
355|4. **Pensão Alimentícia**: Os campos `pensAlim`, `percAliment` e `vrAlim` são usados quando há pensão alimentícia relacionada ao desligamento.
392|18. **Valores Numéricos**: Os campos numéricos (`pensAlim`, `percAliment`, `vrAlim`, `indRemun`) são retornados como inteiros ou decimais conforme o tipo, ou `0`/`0.0` se não disponíveis.
431|// - vrAlim: 1500.00

File: docs/Flowable/Tasks/formatters/esocial_s2399_campos_disponiveis.md
Match lines: 5
35|| `vrAlim` | decimal | Valor da pensão alimentícia | Não | 1500.00 |
206|| `vrAlim` | double | global | Valor da pensão alimentícia |
323|3. **Pensão Alimentícia**: Os campos `pensAlim`, `percAliment` e `vrAlim` são usados quando há pensão alimentícia relacionada ao término do TSV. O campo `pensAlim` indica o tipo de pensão alimentícia:
361|16. **Valores Numéricos**: Os campos numéricos (`pensAlim`, `percAliment`, `vrAlim`, `indRemun`) são retornados como inteiros ou decimais conforme o tipo, ou `0`/`0.0` se não disponíveis.
398|// - vrAlim: 1500.00

File: docs/Flowable/Tasks/formatters/esocial_termination_events_campos_disponiveis.md
Match lines: 8
62|| `vrAlim` | decimal | Valor da pensão alimentícia | Não | 1500.00 |
75|| `vrAlim` | decimal | Valor da pensão alimentícia | Não | 1500.00 |
254|//       "vrAlim": null,
278|//       "vrAlim": 1500.00,
316|    "vrAlim": null,
340|    "vrAlim": 1500.00,
380|      "vrAlim": null,
404|      "vrAlim": 1500.00,

File: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
Match lines: 5
57|    private $vrAlim;
216|    public function getVrAlim(): ?string
218|        return $this->vrAlim;
221|    public function setVrAlim(?string $vrAlim): self
223|        $this->vrAlim = $vrAlim;

File: src/Entity/EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino.php
Match lines: 5
36|    private $vrAlim;
124|    public function getVrAlim(): ?int
126|        return $this->vrAlim;
129|    public function setVrAlim(?int $vrAlim): self
131|        $this->vrAlim = $vrAlim;

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
Match lines: 2
82|        $event->setVrAlim($data['vrAlim'] ?? null);
123|            'vrAlim' => $event->getVrAlim(),

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2399EvtTsvTerminoRepository.php
Match lines: 2
79|        $event->setVrAlim($data['valorPensao']);
110|            'vrAlim' => $event->getVrAlim(),

File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 2
15154|            'vrAlim' => $config['vrAlim'] ?? '',
15290|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getVrAlim(), fn ($value) => $event->setVrAlim($value), $this->decimalOrNull($payload['vrAlim'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);

File: src/Service/ESocialDataService.php
Match lines: 2
1079|        $std->vralim = $evento->getVrAlim();
1331|        $std->vralim = $evento->getVrAlim();

File: src/Service/FlowableServices/FlowableVariablesService.php
Match lines: 4
15209|            $this->formatter->formatDouble('vrAlim', $eventData['vrAlim'] ?? 0.0, 'global'),
15285|            $this->formatter->formatDouble('vrAlim', $eventData['vrAlim'] ?? 0.0, 'global'),
19738|                'vrAlim' => $event->getVrAlim(),
19793|                'vrAlim' => $event->getVrAlim(),

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/jsonSchemes/v_S_01_00_00/evtDeslig.schema
Match lines: 1
73|        "vralim": {

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/jsonSchemes/v_S_01_00_00/evtTSVTermino.schema
Match lines: 1
64|        "vralim": {

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/jsonSchemes/v_S_01_01_00/evtDeslig.schema
Match lines: 1
73|        "vralim": {

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/jsonSchemes/v_S_01_01_00/evtTSVTermino.schema
Match lines: 1
64|        "vralim": {

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/jsonSchemes/v_S_01_02_00/evtDeslig.schema
Match lines: 1
73|        "vralim": {

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/jsonSchemes/v_S_01_02_00/evtProcTrab.schema
Match lines: 1
354|                                            "vralim": {

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/jsonSchemes/v_S_01_02_00/evtTSVTermino.schema
Match lines: 1
64|        "vralim": {

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_00_00/evtDeslig.xsd
Match lines: 1
91|                                        <xs:element name="vrAlim" minOccurs="0" type="TS_vrAlim" />

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_00_00/evtTSVTermino.xsd
Match lines: 1
107|                                        <xs:element name="vrAlim" minOccurs="0" type="TS_vrAlim" />

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_00_00/tipos.xsd
Match lines: 2
3107|    <!-- Campo {vrAlim} -->
3109|    <xs:simpleType name="TS_vrAlim">

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_01_00/evtDeslig.xsd
Match lines: 1
93|                                        <xs:element name="vrAlim" minOccurs="0" type="TS_vrAlim" />

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_01_00/evtTSVTermino.xsd
Match lines: 1
109|                                        <xs:element name="vrAlim" minOccurs="0" type="TS_vrAlim" />

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_01_00/tipos.xsd
Match lines: 2
3341|    <!-- Campo {vrAlim} -->
3343|    <xs:simpleType name="TS_vrAlim">

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_02_00/evtDeslig.xsd
Match lines: 1
94|                                        <xs:element name="vrAlim" minOccurs="0" type="TS_vrAlim" />

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_02_00/evtProcTrab.xsd
Match lines: 1
566|                                                                                        <xs:element name="vrAlim" minOccurs="0" type="TS_vrAlim" />

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_02_00/evtTSVTermino.xsd
Match lines: 1
110|                                        <xs:element name="vrAlim" minOccurs="0" type="TS_vrAlim" />

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_02_00/tipos.xsd
Match lines: 2
3916|    <!-- Campo {vrAlim} -->
3918|    <xs:simpleType name="TS_vrAlim">

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_03_00/evtDeslig.xsd
Match lines: 1
94|                                        <xs:element name="vrAlim" minOccurs="0" type="TS_vrAlim" />

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_03_00/evtProcTrab.xsd
Match lines: 1
578|                                                                                        <xs:element name="vrAlim" minOccurs="0" type="TS_vrAlim" />

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_03_00/evtTSVTermino.xsd
Match lines: 1
110|                                        <xs:element name="vrAlim" minOccurs="0" type="TS_vrAlim" />

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_03_00/tipos.xsd
Match lines: 2
3988|    <!-- Campo {vrAlim} -->
3990|    <xs:simpleType name="TS_vrAlim">

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/src/Factories/Traits/TraitS2299.php
Match lines: 8
112|            "vrAlim",
113|            !empty($this->std->vralim) ? $this->std->vralim : null,
625|            "vrAlim",
626|            !empty($this->std->vralim) ? $this->std->vralim : null,
1144|            "vrAlim",
1145|            !empty($this->std->vralim) ? $this->std->vralim : null,
1675|            "vrAlim",
1676|            !empty($this->std->vralim) ? $this->std->vralim : null,

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/src/Factories/Traits/TraitS2399.php
Match lines: 6
94|            "vrAlim",
95|            !empty($this->std->vralim) ? $this->std->vralim : null,
373|            "vrAlim",
374|            !empty($this->std->vralim) ? $this->std->vralim : null,
662|            "vrAlim",
663|            !empty($this->std->vralim) ? $this->std->vralim : null,

File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/src/Factories/Traits/TraitS2500.php
Match lines: 2
1042|                        "vrAlim",
1043|                        $des->vralim ?? null,

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial/desligamento.html.twig
Match lines: 1
252|        vrAlim: document.getElementById("valorPensao")?.value || "",

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_desligamento/pensao_alimenticia.html.twig
Match lines: 1
63|                    value="{% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.vrAlim %}{{ prevEvts.desligamento.vrAlim }}{% endif %}">

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/pensao_alimenticia.html.twig
Match lines: 1
82|                    value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.vrAlim %}{{ prevEvts.termino.vrAlim }}{% endif %}"

File: tests/ESocialS2299EventTest.php
Match lines: 1
71|        $this->std->vralim = null;

Request #3 deepseek-v4-flash P:22.93K C:1.97K CR:16.64K CW:0 14141ms
Reasoning
Now let's understand the change in the entity. The columns are `decimal(precision=10, scale=2, nullable=true)`. Doctrine returns decimal columns as string. So changing from `?int` to `?string` getter/setter aligns with Doctrine decimal behavior — actually this is a fix. But let me check callers that might break. Key callers: - `src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php` lines 81-82 setter, and lines 122-123 getter. - `ESocialDataService.php` lines 1078-1079, 1330-1331 - assigns to std property, used by TraitS2299 to build XML. - `FlowableVariablesService.php` 19737-19738, 19792-19793 - returns values. - `AutomationExecutionService.php` 15289-15290 - `applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(... decimalOrNull($payload[...] ?? null) ...)`. The change in question for the automation: `decimalOrNull` may return string or null. Passing that string to `setVrAlim(?string)` fine. Now, since the entity columns are decimal, Doctrine's behavior: When persisting, it writes to DB. When hydrating a decimal column, Doctrine returns a PHP string. So the getter returning `?string` is correct. Previously getter declared `?int` — if caller performed arithmetic, it would still work due to type juggling. Actually, wait, if the getter declares `?int` return type and Doctrine returns string via property (not the setter), PHP would... Doctrine hydrates by setting property value directly (it uses the reflection, bypassing setters in many cases). Actually with annotation mapping and no explicit hydration mode, Doctrine sets properties directly via reflection (for both public/protected/private), so the typed property value can be a string even if the getter returns `?int`. Then when calling getter with a declared return type of `?int` but actual value is a string "30.00", PHP would coerce to int? No — return type declaration coerces scalar values when in weak mode. In PHP 7+ default is coercive typing, so string "30.00" returned from method declared `: ?int` would coerce to int 30. That would lose decimal precision — e.g., 30.50 would become... coercing "30.50" to int gives 30? Actually with weak mode, scalar type coercion of string to int is performed. "30.50" coerces to 30. So yes, previously there could be precision loss if the stored value has decimals. Now with the new string return type, values keep full decimal precision. That's an improvement but changes behavior of callers that relied on int. Let's check ESocialDataService & the formatter etc. But ESocialDataService is not in review group; it's a consumer. Since column decimal returns string, getter returns string now, and consumers pass to nfephp-sped-esocial Trait which may expect numeric format. `std->percaliment = $evento->getPercAliment();` where value like "30.00". Then TraitS2299 builds arrays with values. If they are strings, may need numeric conversion for JSON schema. But the docs mention that these fields... Hmm. This might be out of the review group's scope; but we can still comment since we're reviewing entity file and cross-file consumers are impacted. The key question: is this a regression? The change aligns getter/setter type with actual DB decimal column type, so this is a genuine fix. Actually a potential issue: if there were existing stored values in DB (decimal), previously reads were coerced to ints (truncated). Now reading returns string decimals. Could break logic elsewhere comparing with int, or json encode string instead of number. But that's arguably the point of the fix. We need to look at `AutomationExecutionService` to understand the type change context: specifically, `setPercAliment` now expects string but if callers pass int, coercive typing allows int→string conversion in weak mode. In the repo, `setPercAliment($data['percAliment'] ?? null)` — data likely from JSON, string/numeric. fine. Now, notice the sibling entity `EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino` still has `?int` for these fields with same decimal column mapping. That's the inconsistency, but not changed in this PR. Another concern: `pensao_alimenticia.html.twig` for termino uses `prevEvts.termino.percAliment` (S2399? Actually EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino). Wait, `motivo_desligamento.html.twig` and `pensao_alimenticia.html.twig` under `member_guides_esocial_termino` deal with the "termine" (TSV termino) flow, and their prevEvts.termino object type is EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino? Hmm, but this entity changed is S2299 desligamento, and the template uses `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab`. Let's check how prevEvts is populated to understand what the bug was. Let me look at the twig change more carefully: changed condition from `prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` to `prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab`. Original code had a bug: It checked `prevEvts.desligamento` (a different entity) but then accessed `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` — accessing property on possibly null `termino`. The fix checks `prevEvts.termino` first. This appears to be the intended fix and the user background says: "Corrigido erro ao abrir a aba de desligamento quando `prevEvts.termino` ainda não existe." So this is fine and consistent with the rest of the template which uses `prevEvts.termino` checks. But wait — is this template for the "termino" (TSV) or the S2299 "desligamento"? The path is `member_guides_esocial_termino`. And field mtvDesligTsv, dtTerm, nrProcTrab. In eSocial, TSV término event is S-2399. But the entity in the review is S2299 desligamento — different. Anyway the template's prevEvts.termino refers to `EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino` which has nrProcTrab. Let me verify what prevEvts contains. Let me search where this template is rendered, or how prevEvts is built. Actually let's focus: For the twig fix, is it correct? Check: For the "desligamento" (S-2299) tab the corresponding template file `member_guides_esocial_desligamento/pensao_alimenticia.html.twig` uses `prevEvts.desligamento`. And the changed template `motivo_desligamento.html.twig` is in `member_guides_esocial_termino` folder but represents... hmm, the naming is confusing. Actually looking at the twig file for termino: fields mtvDesligTsv, dtTerm... uses `prevEvts.termino`. It's consistent. So the change in the twig is the right fix. Both are correct. Now, let me check what happens if `prevEvts` doesn't exist at all (null?). In the template, is prevEvts always defined? It likely comes from the controller as an object with properties termino, desligamento. Let's search for where this template gets included to verify prevEvts is always set (never undefined). If prevEvts could be null/undefined, accessing prevEvts.termino would still error, but original code accessed `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` too, so not a new problem. The fix reduces the error case. Fine. Now the Ssma test change: renamed the test and added `descaracter_suspect => '1'`. Need to look at the test context and validator to see if it's coherent. Let me read the test file around lines 840-920.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 920, "file_path": "tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php", "start_line": 820}
File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php (Total lines: 990)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 820-920
820|        self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.potential_consequence:', $joined);
821|        self::assertStringNotContainsString('consequence: obrigatório', $joined);
822|
823|        self::assertTrue(
824|            (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Consequência real é obrigatória')),
825|            "Faltou mensagem de consequência real. Erros:\n{$joined}"
826|        );
827|        self::assertTrue(
828|            (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Consequência potencial é obrigatória')),
829|            "Faltou mensagem de consequência potencial. Erros:\n{$joined}"
830|        );
831|        self::assertTrue(
832|            (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Consequência potencial / Gravidade é obrigatória')),
833|            "Faltou mensagem de gravidade. Erros:\n{$joined}"
834|        );
835|        self::assertTrue(
836|            (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Tipo de lesão é obrigatório quando há lesão')),
837|            "Faltou mensagem humana de tipo de lesão. Erros:\n{$joined}"
838|        );
839|        self::assertTrue(
840|            (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Classificação da lesão é obrigatória quando há lesão')),
841|            "Faltou mensagem humana de classificação. Erros:\n{$joined}"
842|        );
843|        self::assertFalse(
844|            (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'caracterizado como acidente')),
845|            "Caracterizar não deve ser exigido na criação. Erros:\n{$joined}"
846|        );
847|    }
848|
849|    public function testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoMedicoComSuspeitaExigeCaracterizar(): void
850|    {
851|        $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
852|
853|        $errors = $validator->validate([
854|            'type'                    => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_PESSOAL,
855|            'origin'                  => 'MANUAL',
856|            'datetime'                => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
857|            'location'                => 'Linha 2',
858|            'description'             => 'Médico finalizando aprofundamento',
859|            'aprofundamento_complete' => true,
860|            'aprofundamento_only'     => true,
861|            'nature'                  => 'CORTE',
862|            'agent'                   => 'FERRAMENTA',
863|            'consequence'             => 'LESAO_LEVE',
864|            'impacts'                 => ['PESSOA'],
865|            'details'                 => [
866|                'activity'              => 'Operação de corte',
867|                'approach'              => 'TREINAMENTO',
868|                'strategic_nature'      => 'SEGURANCA',
869|                'barrier_type'          => 'FISICA',
870|                'potential_consequence' => 'LESAO_MODERADA',
871|                'potential_severity'    => 'MODERADO',
872|                'person_id'             => '101',
873|                'person_type'           => 'COLABORADOR',
874|                'had_injury'            => true,
875|                'injury_type'           => 'CORTE',
876|                'injury_severity'       => 'LEVE',
877|                'injury_classification' => 'FAC',
878|                'descaracter_suspect'   => '1',
879|                'body_parts'            => [
880|                    ['region' => 'MAO', 'side' => 'DIREITA', 'injury_type' => 'CORTE'],
881|                ],
882|            ],
883|        ]);
884|
885|        self::assertTrue(
886|            (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'caracterizado como acidente')),
887|            'Médico deve informar se foi caracterizado. Erros: ' . implode(' | ', $errors)
888|        );
889|    }
890|
891|    public function testPayloadComInjuryTypePreenchidoDisparaValidacaoAprofundamento(): void
892|    {
893|        $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
894|
895|        $errors = $validator->validate([
896|            'type'        => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_PESSOAL,
897|            'origin'      => 'MANUAL',
898|            'datetime'    => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
899|            'location'    => 'Linha 2',
900|            'description' => 'Enviou injury_type sem completar aprofundamento',
901|            'details'     => [
902|                'activity'    => 'Operação',
903|                'approach'    => 'CORRECAO_OPERACIONAL',
904|                'person_id'   => '101',
905|                'person_type' => 'COLABORADOR',
906|                'injury_type' => 'CORTE',
907|                'had_injury'  => true,
908|            ],
909|        ]);
910|
911|        self::assertNotEmpty($errors);
912|        $joined = implode(' | ', $errors);
913|        self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.injury_type:', $joined);
914|        self::assertTrue(
915|            (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Consequência real')),
916|            'Com injury_type preenchido deve exigir aprofundamento. Erros: ' . $joined
917|        );
918|    }
919|
920|    public function testAcidentePessoalEtapa1SemPessoaRetornaMensagemHumana(): void
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 200, "file_path": "src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php", "start_line": 1}
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php (Total lines: 296)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-200
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Repository;
4|
5|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
6|use Doctrine\Bundle\DoctrineBundle\Repository\ServiceEntityRepository;
7|use Doctrine\ORM\OptimisticLockException;
8|use Doctrine\ORM\ORMException;
9|use Doctrine\Persistence\ManagerRegistry;
10|
11|/**
12| * @extends ServiceEntityRepository<EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento>
13| *
14| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento|null find($id, $lockMode = null, $lockVersion = null)
15| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento|null findOneBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null)
16| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[]    findAll()
17| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[]    findBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null, $limit = null, $offset = null)
18| */
19|class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository extends ServiceEntityRepository
20|{
21|    public function __construct(ManagerRegistry $registry)
22|    {
23|        parent::__construct($registry, EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class);
24|    }
25|
26|    /**
27|     * @throws ORMException
28|     * @throws OptimisticLockException
29|     */
30|    public function add(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $entity, bool $flush = true): void
31|    {
32|        $this->_em->persist($entity);
33|        if ($flush) {
34|            $this->_em->flush();
35|        }
36|    }
37|
38|    /**
39|     * @throws ORMException
40|     * @throws OptimisticLockException
41|     */
42|    public function remove(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $entity, bool $flush = true): void
43|    {
44|        $this->_em->remove($entity);
45|        if ($flush) {
46|            $this->_em->flush();
47|        }
48|    }
49|
50|    function sanitizeCNPJ($cnpj) {
51|        return preg_replace('/\D/', '', $cnpj);
52|    }
53|
54|    function sanitizeCPF($cpf) {
55|        return preg_replace('/\D/', '', $cpf);
56|    }
57|
58|    private function buildDateOrNull(?string $date): ?\DateTime
59|    {
60|        return !empty($date) ? new \DateTime($date) : null;
61|    }
62|
63|    public function saveEventS2299($esocialDadosTrabalhador, $data, $company, $dadosRemuneracao): EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
64|    {
65|        $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
66|        $event->setModo( 'INC');
67|        $event->setCompany($company);
68|        $event->setTpAmb($company->getEsocialMode() ?? '2');
69|        $event->setTpInscTransmissor(1);
70|        $event->setNrInscTransmissor($this->sanitizeCNPJ($company->getCnpj()));
71|        $event->setEsocialTrabalhador($esocialDadosTrabalhador);
72|        $event->setIndRetif(1);
73|        $event->setStatus('pendente');
74|        $event->setCreatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
75|        $event->setMtvDeslig($data['motivoDesligamento'] ?? null);
76|        $event->setDtDeslig($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataDesligamento']) ?? null);
77|        $event->setDtAvPrv($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataConcessaoAviso']) ?? null);
78|        $event->setIndPagtoApi($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N');
79|        $event->setDtProjFimApi($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataTerminoAviso']) ?? null);
80|        $event->setPensAlim($data['pensAlim'] ?? null);
81|        $event->setPercAliment($data['percAliment'] ?? null);
82|        $event->setVrAlim($data['vrAlim'] ?? null);
83|        $event->setNrProcTrab($data['numeroProcesso'] ?? null);
84|        $event->setIndPdv($data['indPdv'] ?? null);
85|        $event->setCpfSubstituto($this->sanitizeCPF($data['cpfSubstituto']) ?? null);
86|        $event->setDtNascto($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataNascimentoTitular']) ?? null);
87|        $event->setNovoCpf($this->sanitizeCPF($data['novoCpfTrabalhador']) ?? null);
88|        $event->setIndRemun($data['indRemun'] ?? null);
89|        $event->setDtFimRemun($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dtFimRemun']) ?? null);
90|        $event->setInsConsig($data['matriculaInstituicao'] ?? null);
91|        $event->setNrContr($data['numeroContrato'] ?? null);
92|        $event->setDadosRemuneracao($dadosRemuneracao);
93|
94|        $this->add($event);
95|
96|        return $event;
97|    }
98|
99|    /**
100|     * Extrai todos os dados do evento S-2299 para formatação no FlowableVariablesService
101|     * 
102|     * @param int $eventId ID do evento (EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento)
103|     * @return array|null Dados estruturados do evento e relacionamentos, ou null se não encontrado
104|     */
105|    public function getFlowableDataForTemplate(int $eventId): ?array
106|    {
107|        $event = $this->find($eventId);
108|        
109|        if (!$event) {
110|            return null;
111|        }
112|        
113|        // Extrair dados principais do evento
114|        $data = [
115|            'id' => $event->getId(),
116|            'mtvDeslig' => $event->getMtvDeslig(),
117|            'dtDeslig' => $event->getDtDeslig()?->format('Y-m-d'),
118|            'dtAvPrv' => $event->getDtAvPrv()?->format('Y-m-d'),
119|            'indPagtoApi' => $event->getIndPagtoApi(),
120|            'dtProjFimApi' => $event->getDtProjFimApi()?->format('Y-m-d'),
121|            'pensAlim' => $event->getPensAlim(),
122|            'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),
123|            'vrAlim' => $event->getVrAlim(),
124|            'nrProcTrab' => $event->getNrProcTrab(),
125|            'indPdv' => $event->getIndPdv(),
126|            'cpfSubstituto' => $event->getCpfSubstituto(),
127|            'dtNascto' => $event->getDtNascto()?->format('Y-m-d'),
128|            'novoCpf' => $event->getNovoCpf(),
129|            'indRemun' => $event->getIndRemun(),
130|            'dtFimRemun' => $event->getDtFimRemun()?->format('Y-m-d'),
131|            'insConsig' => $event->getInsConsig(),
132|            'nrContr' => $event->getNrContr(),
133|        ];
134|        
135|        // Extrair dados da classe pai (EsocialEvents)
136|        $data['modo'] = $event->getModo();
137|        $data['tpAmb'] = $event->getTpAmb();
138|        $data['uniqueEventId'] = $event->getUniqueEventId();
139|        $data['tpInscTransmissor'] = $event->getTpInscTransmissor();
140|        $data['nrInscTransmissor'] = $event->getNrInscTransmissor();
141|        $data['iniValid'] = $event->getIniValid();
142|        $data['fimValid'] = $event->getFimValid();
143|        $data['indRetif'] = $event->getIndRetif();
144|        $data['indApuracao'] = $event->getIndApuracao();
145|        $data['perApur'] = $event->getPerApur()?->format('Y-m-d');
146|        $data['indGuia'] = $event->getIndGuia();
147|        $data['status'] = $event->getStatus();
148|        $data['createdAt'] = $event->getCreatedAt()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s');
149|        $data['updatedAt'] = $event->getUpdatedAt()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s');
150|        
151|        // Extrair dados da empresa
152|        $company = $event->getCompany();
153|        if ($company) {
154|            $data['company'] = [
155|                'id' => $company->getId(),
156|                'name' => $company->getName(),
157|                'code' => $company->getCode(),
158|                'cnpj' => $company->getCnpj(),
159|            ];
160|        } else {
161|            $data['company'] = null;
162|        }
163|        
164|        // Extrair dados do trabalhador eSocial relacionado
165|        $esocialTrabalhador = $event->getEsocialTrabalhador();
166|        if ($esocialTrabalhador) {
167|            $dadosTrabalhador = $esocialTrabalhador->getDadosTrabalhador();
168|            $endereco = $esocialTrabalhador->getEndereco();
169|            
170|            $data['esocialTrabalhador'] = [
171|                'id' => $esocialTrabalhador->getId(),
172|                'isTrabalhadorSemVinculo' => $esocialTrabalhador->getIsTrabalhadorSemVinculo(),
173|                'dadosTrabalhador' => $dadosTrabalhador ? [
174|                    'cpfTrab' => $dadosTrabalhador->getCpfTrab(),
175|                    'nmTrab' => $dadosTrabalhador->getNmTrab(),
176|                    'sexo' => $dadosTrabalhador->getSexo(),
177|                    'racaCor' => $dadosTrabalhador->getRacaCor(),
178|                    'estCiv' => $dadosTrabalhador->getEstCiv(),
179|                    'grauInstr' => $dadosTrabalhador->getGrauInstr(),
180|                    'nmSoc' => $dadosTrabalhador->getNmSoc(),
181|                    'dtNascto' => $dadosTrabalhador->getDtNascto()?->format('Y-m-d'),
182|                    'paisNascto' => $dadosTrabalhador->getPaisNascto(),
183|                    'paisNac' => $dadosTrabalhador->getPaisNac(),
184|                    'fonePrinc' => $dadosTrabalhador->getFonePrinc(),
185|                    'emailPrinc' => $dadosTrabalhador->getEmailPrinc(),
186|                    'dtAltDadosPessoais' => $dadosTrabalhador->getDtAltDadosPessoais()?->format('Y-m-d'),
187|                ] : null,
188|                'endereco' => $endereco ? [
189|                    'brasil' => $endereco->getBrasil() ? [
190|                        'tpLograd' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getTpLograd(),
191|                        'dscLograd' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getDscLograd(),
192|                        'nrLograd' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getNrLograd(),
193|                        'complemento' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getComplemento(),
194|                        'bairro' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getBairro(),
195|                        'cep' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getCep(),
196|                        'codMunic' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getCodMunic(),
197|                        'uf' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getUf(),
198|                    ] : null,
199|                    'exterior' => $endereco->getExterior() ? [
200|                        'paisResid' => $endereco->getExterior()->getPaisResid(),
Request #4 deepseek-v4-flash P:29.56K C:1.09K CR:24.83K CW:0 10049ms
Reasoning
Now, let me examine how the AutomationExecutionService uses setPercAliment/setVrAlim (lines 15289-15290). Actually let me first understand the context of the change: the fields are decimal columns in the DB. Since Doctrine returns decimal as string, the change to string type getter/setter aligns with the ORM. That makes this a legitimate fix. But wait — in the S2299 template for pensão alimentícia, values from form are sent... Let me check where data comes from in `saveEventS2299`. $data['percAliment'] likely from a request - numeric string from input. This was being passed to `setPercAliment(?int)`, previously coercing "30.50" to 30! That loses the fractional part. Now string, keeps value. That's an improvement. Also, AutomationExecutionService lines 15289-15290: let me check decimalOrNull behavior. Let me read the surrounding context in AutomationExecutionService. Also the sibling entity EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino retains `?int` types. This creates inconsistency but it's not a bug per se. Now what about the entity field typed property: since property `$percAliment` is untyped (no `private ?string $percAliment;`), setter param typed string works. Let me examine `ESocialDataService` lines 1070-1090, and 1320-1340 to understand whether getVrAlim/getPercAliment string output causes problems downstream in building XML (e.g., TraitS2299 expecting the value to be non-empty, converting to float). And also check the Flowable formatter formatDouble which converts. Actually those docs say the fields are numeric. The key issue with the change: previously `getPercAliment(): ?int` returned an int for stored decimal values (with possible truncation). Now returning `?string`. Code that relies on `getPercAliment()` being an int, e.g., arithmetic `$perc * 100`, would break? In PHP arithmetic on numeric strings works fine. So string numeric values are fine in arithmetic. Comparisons also generally work (numeric string vs int loose compare true). But strict comparisons would break. Given callers mostly pass to json/std. Let's check ESocialDataService to be thorough. Actually, let me not over-engineer. The change is in review group. Its potential issue: In ESocialDataService, `$std->percaliment = $evento->getPercAliment();` then the trait builds an array with value. The JSON schema probably expects number for percaliment? It's `TS_percAliment` decimal. If string "30.50" is used to build arrays, and then json_encode... the JSON scheme in eSocial probably accepts decimals as numbers/strings? Actually sped-esocial Trait uses these values when mounting arrays to validate against JSON schema. Since JSON schema might require numeric value... but they validate with only schema on the exact... hmm. Hard to confirm. Given these callers were unchanged and previously received int (rounded/truncated values), previously worked. Now strings — could that break the JSON schema validation? JSON schema for numbers will accept a string that is a number? Not with strict typing; JSON schema defaults to non-strict, so a string "30.50" would NOT match number type in JSON schema unless coercion. Actually JSON schema type "number" doesn't accept strings. But maybe they cast. In TraitS2299 at line ~106: `!empty($this->std->percaliment) ? $this->std->percaliment : null,`. Not casting. Wait — but the columns are decimals in DB. How do existing rows currently get read and used? Previously getter declared `?int`, but the actual property was populated by Doctrine via reflection with a string value. Calling the getter (declared `?int`) in weak mode coerces the string to int, causing truncation. E.g., a stored "30.00" → int 30 (fine), stored "500.00" → int 500. If a user stored 30.50, previously read as 30, now read as "30.50". This could affect data exported to eSocial: now precise. Good. Given the diff is focused and the change only affects these two decimal fields, and since these fields were decimal in the DB from the start, the string type is actually the correct representation. I should not flag this as a bug unless I find a caller that breaks. Let me look at AutomationExecutionService context lines 15140-15300 to understand usage, and also the `decimalOrNull` helper and `applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue`.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 15320, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 15080}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15626)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 15080-15320
15080|                    ? 'Rascunho do S-2299 criado/atualizado e responsável notificado'
15081|                    : ($eventStatus === 'existing_not_editable'
15082|                        ? 'Rascunho do S-2299 registrado; já existe evento oficial não editável para este trabalhador'
15083|                        : 'Rascunho do S-2299 registrado; dados eSocial pendentes impedem criar o evento oficial'),
15084|                'offboardingMemberId' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
15085|                'companyMemberId' => $companyMember->getId(),
15086|                'responsibleId' => $responsible->getId(),
15087|                'eventId' => $event?->getId(),
15088|                'eventStatus' => $eventStatus,
15089|                'missing' => $missing,
15090|                'reviewUrl' => $reviewUrl,
15091|                'notification' => $notification,
15092|            ];
15093|        } catch (\Throwable $e) {
15094|            $this->log('error', 'Erro ao criar rascunho S-2299 via offboarding', [
15095|                'error' => $e->getMessage(),
15096|                'memberId' => $member->getId(),
15097|            ]);
15098|
15099|            return ['success' => false, 'error' => $e->getMessage()];
15100|        }
15101|    }
15102|
15103|    private function resolveEsocialS2299Responsible(array $config, FlowInstanceMember $member, \App\Entity\OffboardingMember $offboardingMember): ?CompanyMembers
15104|    {
15105|        $configuredId = $config['responsible_id']
15106|            ?? $config['responsibleId']
15107|            ?? $config['company_member_id']
15108|            ?? $config['member_id']
15109|            ?? null;
15110|
15111|        $flowCompany = $member->getFlowInstance()?->getCompany();
15112|
15113|        if ($configuredId) {
15114|            $responsible = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find((int) $configuredId);
15115|            if (
15116|                $responsible instanceof CompanyMembers
15117|                && $flowCompany instanceof Company
15118|                && $responsible->getCompany()?->getId() === $flowCompany->getId()
15119|            ) {
15120|                return $responsible;
15121|            }
15122|        }
15123|
15124|        $flowResponsible = $member->getFlowInstance()?->getFlowResponsible();
15125|        if ($flowResponsible instanceof CompanyMembers) {
15126|            return $flowResponsible;
15127|        }
15128|
15129|        $offboardingResponsible = $offboardingMember->getOffboarding()?->getOffboardingFlowResponsible();
15130|        if ($offboardingResponsible instanceof CompanyMembers) {
15131|            return $offboardingResponsible;
15132|        }
15133|
15134|        return null;
15135|    }
15136|
15137|    private function buildEsocialS2299DraftPayload(
15138|        \App\Entity\OffboardingMember $offboardingMember,
15139|        CompanyMembers $companyMember,
15140|        CompanyMembers $responsible,
15141|        array $config
15142|    ): array {
15143|        $dismissalDate = $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate();
15144|
15145|        return [
15146|            'member' => $companyMember->getId(),
15147|            'motivoDesligamento' => $config['motivoDesligamento'] ?? $config['mtvDeslig'] ?? '',
15148|            'dataDesligamento' => $dismissalDate ? $dismissalDate->format('Y-m-d') : '',
15149|            'dataConcessaoAviso' => $config['dataConcessaoAviso'] ?? '',
15150|            'avisoPrevioIndenizado' => $config['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ?? '',
15151|            'dataTerminoAviso' => $config['dataTerminoAviso'] ?? '',
15152|            'pensAlim' => $config['pensAlim'] ?? '',
15153|            'percAliment' => $config['percAliment'] ?? '',
15154|            'vrAlim' => $config['vrAlim'] ?? '',
15155|            'numeroProcesso' => $config['numeroProcesso'] ?? '',
15156|            'indPdv' => $config['indPdv'] ?? '',
15157|            'cpfSubstituto' => $config['cpfSubstituto'] ?? '',
15158|            'dataNascimentoTitular' => $config['dataNascimentoTitular'] ?? '',
15159|            'novoCpfTrabalhador' => $config['novoCpfTrabalhador'] ?? '',
15160|            'indRemun' => $config['indRemun'] ?? '',
15161|            'dtFimRemun' => $config['dtFimRemun'] ?? '',
15162|            'matriculaInstituicao' => $config['matriculaInstituicao'] ?? '',
15163|            'numeroContrato' => $config['numeroContrato'] ?? '',
15164|            '_offboarding' => [
15165|                'offboardingMemberId' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
15166|                'offboardingId' => $offboardingMember->getOffboarding()?->getId(),
15167|                'reason' => $offboardingMember->getReason(),
15168|                'responsibleId' => $responsible->getId(),
15169|                'responsibleName' => $responsible->getFullName(),
15170|            ],
15171|        ];
15172|    }
15173|
15174|    private function findEsocialS2299EventLinkedToOffboarding(
15175|        FlowInstanceMember $member,
15176|        \App\Entity\OffboardingMember $offboardingMember,
15177|        Company $company,
15178|        EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador,
15179|        EsocialDadosRemuneracao $remuneracao
15180|    ): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
15181|    {
15182|        $metadata = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? [];
15183|        if (!is_array($metadata)) {
15184|            return null;
15185|        }
15186|
15187|        $draftMetadata = $metadata['esocialS2299Draft'] ?? null;
15188|        if (
15189|            !is_array($draftMetadata)
15190|            || (int) ($draftMetadata['offboardingMemberId'] ?? 0) !== (int) $offboardingMember->getId()
15191|            || empty($draftMetadata['eventId'])
15192|        ) {
15193|            return null;
15194|        }
15195|
15196|        $event = $this->entityManager
15197|            ->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
15198|            ->find((int) $draftMetadata['eventId']);
15199|
15200|        if (!$event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
15201|            return null;
15202|        }
15203|
15204|        return $this->esocialS2299EventMatchesContext($event, $company, $esocialTrabalhador, $remuneracao, $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate())
15205|            ? $event
15206|            : null;
15207|    }
15208|
15209|    private function findExistingEsocialS2299EventForCurrentDismissal(
15210|        Company $company,
15211|        EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador,
15212|        EsocialDadosRemuneracao $remuneracao,
15213|        ?\DateTimeInterface $dismissalDate
15214|    ): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento {
15215|        if (!$dismissalDate instanceof \DateTimeInterface) {
15216|            return null;
15217|        }
15218|
15219|        return $this->entityManager
15220|            ->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
15221|            ->createQueryBuilder('event')
15222|            ->andWhere('event.company = :company')
15223|            ->andWhere('event.esocialTrabalhador = :esocialTrabalhador')
15224|            ->andWhere('event.dadosRemuneracao = :remuneracao')
15225|            ->andWhere('event.dtDeslig = :dismissalDate')
15226|            ->andWhere('event.status != :pendingStatus')
15227|            ->setParameter('company', $company)
15228|            ->setParameter('esocialTrabalhador', $esocialTrabalhador)
15229|            ->setParameter('remuneracao', $remuneracao)
15230|            ->setParameter('dismissalDate', $dismissalDate->format('Y-m-d'))
15231|            ->setParameter('pendingStatus', 'pendente')
15232|            ->orderBy('event.id', 'DESC')
15233|            ->setMaxResults(1)
15234|            ->getQuery()
15235|            ->getOneOrNullResult();
15236|    }
15237|
15238|    private function esocialS2299EventMatchesContext(
15239|        EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $event,
15240|        Company $company,
15241|        EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador,
15242|        EsocialDadosRemuneracao $remuneracao,
15243|        ?\DateTimeInterface $dismissalDate
15244|    ): bool {
15245|        if ($event->getCompany()?->getId() !== $company->getId()) {
15246|            return false;
15247|        }
15248|
15249|        if ($event->getEsocialTrabalhador()?->getId() !== $esocialTrabalhador->getId()) {
15250|            return false;
15251|        }
15252|
15253|        if ($event->getDadosRemuneracao()?->getId() !== $remuneracao->getId()) {
15254|            return false;
15255|        }
15256|
15257|        $eventDismissalDate = $event->getDtDeslig();
15258|        if (!$eventDismissalDate instanceof \DateTimeInterface || !$dismissalDate instanceof \DateTimeInterface) {
15259|            return true;
15260|        }
15261|
15262|        return $eventDismissalDate->format('Y-m-d') === $dismissalDate->format('Y-m-d');
15263|    }
15264|
15265|    private function createEsocialS2299DraftEvent(Company $company, EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador): EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
15266|    {
15267|        $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
15268|        $event->setModo('INC');
15269|        $event->setCompany($company);
15270|        $event->setTpAmb($company->getEsocialMode() ?? '2');
15271|        $event->setTpInscTransmissor(1);
15272|        $event->setNrInscTransmissor($this->onlyDigits((string) $company->getCnpj()));
15273|        $event->setEsocialTrabalhador($esocialTrabalhador);
15274|        $event->setIndRetif(1);
15275|        $event->setStatus('pendente');
15276|        $event->setCreatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
15277|
15278|        return $event;
15279|    }
15280|
15281|    private function applyEsocialS2299Payload(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $event, array $payload, bool $onlyEmptyFields = false): void
15282|    {
15283|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getMtvDeslig(), fn ($value) => $event->setMtvDeslig($value), $this->stringOrNull($payload['motivoDesligamento'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15284|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getDtDeslig(), fn ($value) => $event->setDtDeslig($value), $this->dateOrNull($payload['dataDesligamento'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15285|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getDtAvPrv(), fn ($value) => $event->setDtAvPrv($value), $this->dateOrNull($payload['dataConcessaoAviso'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15286|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getIndPagtoApi(), fn ($value) => $event->setIndPagtoApi($value), $this->booleanStringOrNull($payload['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15287|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getDtProjFimApi(), fn ($value) => $event->setDtProjFimApi($value), $this->dateOrNull($payload['dataTerminoAviso'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15288|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getPensAlim(), fn ($value) => $event->setPensAlim($value), $this->intOrNull($payload['pensAlim'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15289|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getPercAliment(), fn ($value) => $event->setPercAliment($value), $this->decimalOrNull($payload['percAliment'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15290|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getVrAlim(), fn ($value) => $event->setVrAlim($value), $this->decimalOrNull($payload['vrAlim'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15291|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getNrProcTrab(), fn ($value) => $event->setNrProcTrab($value), $this->stringOrNull($payload['numeroProcesso'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15292|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getIndPdv(), fn ($value) => $event->setIndPdv($value), $this->stringOrNull($payload['indPdv'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15293|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getCpfSubstituto(), fn ($value) => $event->setCpfSubstituto($value), $this->cpfOrNull($payload['cpfSubstituto'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15294|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getDtNascto(), fn ($value) => $event->setDtNascto($value), $this->dateOrNull($payload['dataNascimentoTitular'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15295|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getNovoCpf(), fn ($value) => $event->setNovoCpf($value), $this->cpfOrNull($payload['novoCpfTrabalhador'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15296|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getIndRemun(), fn ($value) => $event->setIndRemun($value), $this->intOrNull($payload['indRemun'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15297|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getDtFimRemun(), fn ($value) => $event->setDtFimRemun($value), $this->dateOrNull($payload['dtFimRemun'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15298|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getInsConsig(), fn ($value) => $event->setInsConsig($value), $this->stringOrNull($payload['matriculaInstituicao'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15299|        $this->applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(fn () => $event->getNrContr(), fn ($value) => $event->setNrContr($value), $this->stringOrNull($payload['numeroContrato'] ?? null), $onlyEmptyFields);
15300|    }
15301|
15302|    private function applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue(callable $getter, callable $setter, mixed $value, bool $onlyEmptyFields): void
15303|    {
15304|        if ($value === null) {
15305|            return;
15306|        }
15307|
15308|        $currentValue = $getter();
15309|        if ($onlyEmptyFields && $currentValue !== null && $currentValue !== '') {
15310|            return;
15311|        }
15312|
15313|        $setter($value);
15314|    }
15315|
15316|    private function buildEsocialS2299ReviewUrl(CompanyMembers $companyMember): string
15317|    {
15318|        $path = $this->router
15319|            ? $this->router->generate('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => $companyMember->getId()])
15320|            : '/my-company/member/' . $companyMember->getId();
Request #5 deepseek-v4-flash P:34.88K C:395 CR:30.59K CW:0 3868ms
Reasoning
I see. AutomationExecutionService uses decimalOrNull for percAliment and vrAlim values. Let me look for `decimalOrNull` helper implementation. Also, note something important here: `applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue` uses `$onlyEmptyFields && $currentValue !== null && $currentValue !== ''` — getter return type: previously getPercAliment(): ?int. Since the field stored in DB decimal was already decimal, hydrating a loaded event and calling `getPercAliment()` previously returned int via coercion; now returns string. This matters for `applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue` which compares `$currentValue !== null && $currentValue !== ''`. String "30.00" vs '' works fine. Previously, though, there could be a fatal: When loading an event from DB with value "30.50", and calling getter declared `?int`, in weak mode PHP coerces "30.50" to 30. Actually with fractional "30.50", coercion to int yields 30. So precision loss on read. This change fixes it. Now let's inspect `decimalOrNull`. Also inspect the ESocialDataService usage to see if the change introduces new issues. Let me view decimalOrNull and check the php version - composer.json.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "function decimalOrNull"}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 1
15358|    private function decimalOrNull(mixed $value): ?string

file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 1090, "file_path": "src/Service/ESocialDataService.php", "start_line": 1050}
File: src/Service/ESocialDataService.php (Total lines: 3725)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1050-1090
1050|        return [
1051|            'std' => $std,
1052|            'configJson' => $configJson
1053|        ];
1054|    }
1055|
1056|    private function treatS2299Data(EsocialS2299EvtDeslig $evento): array
1057|    {
1058|        $std = new \stdClass();
1059|        $std->modo = $evento->getModo() ?? 'INC';
1060|        
1061|        // Grupo ideEvento
1062|        $std->indretif = $evento->getIndRetif();
1063|        if ($evento->getIndRetif() == 2) {
1064|            $std->nrrecibo = $evento->getNrRecibo();
1065|        }
1066|        
1067|        // Grupo ideVinculo
1068|        $std->cpftrab = preg_replace('/[^0-9]/', '', $evento->getCpfTrab());
1069|        $std->matricula = $evento->getMatricula();
1070|        
1071|        // Grupo infoDeslig
1072|        $std->mtvdeslig = $evento->getMtvDeslig();
1073|        $std->dtdeslig = $evento->getDtDeslig() ? $evento->getDtDeslig()->format('Y-m-d') : null;
1074|        $std->dtavprv = $evento->getDtAvPrv() ? $evento->getDtAvPrv()->format('Y-m-d') : null;
1075|        $std->indpagtoapi = $evento->getIndPagtoAPI();
1076|        $std->dtprojfimapi = $evento->getDtProjFimAPI() ? $evento->getDtProjFimAPI()->format('Y-m-d') : null;
1077|        $std->pensalim = $evento->getPensAlim();
1078|        $std->percaliment = $evento->getPercAliment();
1079|        $std->vralim = $evento->getVrAlim();
1080|        
1081|        // Grupo sucessaoVinc (opcional)
1082|        if ($evento->getSucessaoVinc()) {
1083|            $sucessaoVinc = $evento->getSucessaoVinc();
1084|            $std->sucessaovinc = new \stdClass();
1085|            $std->sucessaovinc->tpinsc = $sucessaoVinc->getTpInsc();
1086|            $std->sucessaovinc->nrinsc = $sucessaoVinc->getNrInsc();
1087|        }
1088|        
1089|        // Grupo transfTit (opcional)
1090|        if ($evento->getTransfTit()) {
Request #6 deepseek-v4-flash P:36.04K C:315 CR:35.2K CW:0 2449ms
Reasoning
Wait, ESocialDataService::treatS2299Data references `EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` (not EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento)? Hmm. It seems `EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` might be another entity that extends or is an alias. Actually the search result at lines 1078-1079 from the file src/Service/ESocialDataService.php matched `$std->percaliment = $evento->getPercAliment();`. Let's check the type of $evento in that method — `EsocialS2299EvtDeslig`. That may be a different entity from EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento. Hmm. But search for PercAliment in the entity... there might be two entities. Let me search for class EsocialS2299EvtDeslig.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "class EsocialS2299EvtDeslig"}
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
Match lines: 1
11|class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento extends EsocialEvents

File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
19|class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository extends ServiceEntityRepository

file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 15380, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 15330}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15626)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 15330-15380
15330|
15331|        $value = is_scalar($value) ? trim((string) $value) : '';
15332|        if ($value === '') {
15333|            return null;
15334|        }
15335|
15336|        try {
15337|            return new \DateTime($value);
15338|        } catch (\Throwable) {
15339|            return null;
15340|        }
15341|    }
15342|
15343|    private function stringOrNull(mixed $value): ?string
15344|    {
15345|        $value = is_scalar($value) ? trim((string) $value) : '';
15346|        return $value !== '' ? $value : null;
15347|    }
15348|
15349|    private function intOrNull(mixed $value): ?int
15350|    {
15351|        if ($value === null || $value === '') {
15352|            return null;
15353|        }
15354|
15355|        return is_numeric($value) ? (int) $value : null;
15356|    }
15357|
15358|    private function decimalOrNull(mixed $value): ?string
15359|    {
15360|        if ($value === null || $value === '' || !is_scalar($value)) {
15361|            return null;
15362|        }
15363|
15364|        $normalized = str_replace(['R$', '%', ' '], '', trim((string) $value));
15365|        if ($normalized === '') {
15366|            return null;
15367|        }
15368|
15369|        if (str_contains($normalized, ',')) {
15370|            $normalized = str_replace('.', '', $normalized);
15371|            $normalized = str_replace(',', '.', $normalized);
15372|        }
15373|
15374|        return is_numeric($normalized) ? number_format((float) $normalized, 2, '.', '') : null;
15375|    }
15376|
15377|    private function booleanStringOrNull(mixed $value): ?string
15378|    {
15379|        if ($value === null || $value === '') {
15380|            return null;
Request #7 deepseek-v4-flash P:37.01K C:478 CR:36.35K CW:0 4070ms
Reasoning
OK, in AutomationExecutionService `decimalOrNull` returns string formatted "30.00". So passing to setPercAliment(?string) makes sense. The entity change appears consistent with the new automation logic: they want to store a decimal with cents as a string ("30.00"), which requires setter accepting a string (previously, `setPercAliment(?int)` would coerce "30.00" to int 30, losing precision). Wait — but could `setPercAliment(?int)` previously coerce and truncate? If the setter had type `?int` in weak mode, passing "30.50" coerces to 30. Yes. So this entity change aligns types with decimal column storage and new automation code. Good. But now consider this important implication: the DB column is decimal(10,2). Values are stored numerically. When the old code read them with the getter (declared `?int`), PHP coerced string "30.00" to int 30 on every read. Now getter returns the raw decimal string "30.00". Consumers: 1. ESocialDataService - wait, that's EsocialS2299EvtDeslig entity, not this one. Actually ESocialDataService method uses `EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` type — there may be an older class. Search found only EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento in entity directory. Where does `EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` come from? Let me check imports in ESocialDataService.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "EsocialS2299EvtDeslig", "file_patterns": ["src/Entity/"]}
File: src/Entity/EsocialEvents.php
Match lines: 2
31|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
66| *     "s2299" = "EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento",

File: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
Match lines: 3
5|use App\Repository\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository;
9| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass=EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::class)
11|class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento extends EsocialEvents

file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 40, "file_path": "src/Service/ESocialDataService.php", "start_line": 1}
File: src/Service/ESocialDataService.php (Total lines: 3725)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-40
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Service;
4|
5|use App\Entity\EsocialS2221EvtExmToxMot;
6|use SimpleXMLElement;
7|use Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\ParameterBag\ParameterBagInterface;
8|use App\Entity\EsocialConfigEvents;
9|use App\Entity\EsocialEvents;
10|use App\Entity\EsocialDadosTrabalhador;
11|use App\Entity\EsocialEvtsTrabalhador\DadosTrabalhador;
12|use App\Entity\EsocialEvtsTrabalhador\Vinculo;
13|use App\Entity\EsocialEvtsTrabalhador\Contrato;
14|use App\Entity\EsocialS1000EvtInfoEmpregador;
15|use App\Entity\EsocialS1005EvtTabEstab;
16|use App\Entity\EsocialS1020EvtTabLotacao;
17|use App\Entity\EsocialS1070EvtTabProcesso;
18|use App\Entity\EsocialS2200EvtAdmissao;
19|use App\Entity\EsocialS2190EvtAdmPrelim;
20|use App\Entity\EsocialS2205EvtAltCadastral;
21|use App\Entity\EsocialS2206EvtAltContratual;
22|use App\Entity\EsocialS2298EvtReintegr;
23|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDeslig;
24|use App\Entity\EsocialS2300EvtTSVInicio;
25|use App\Entity\EsocialS2306EvtTSVAltContr;
26|use App\Entity\EsocialS2399EvtTSVTermino;
27|use App\Entity\EsocialS2230EvtAfastTemp;
28|use App\Entity\EsocialS1010EvtTabRubrica;
29|use App\Entity\EsocialS1200EvtRemun;
30|use App\Entity\EsocialS1210EvtPgtos;
31|use App\Entity\EsocialS1260EvtComProd;
32|use App\Entity\EsocialS1270EvtContratAvNP;
33|use App\Entity\EsocialS2210EvtCAT;
34|use App\Entity\EsocialS2220EvtMonit;
35|use App\Entity\EsocialS2240EvtExpRisco;
36|use App\Entity\EsocialS2500EvtProcTrab;
37|use App\Entity\EsocialS3500EvtExcProcTrab;
38|use App\Entity\EsocialS1250EvtAqProd;
39|use App\Entity\EsocialS1280EvtInfoComplPer;
40|use App\Entity\EsocialS1298EvtReabreEvPer;
Request #8 deepseek-v4-flash P:38.31K C:347 CR:37.38K CW:0 3347ms
Reasoning
There's `EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` (different from EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) which is used by ESocialDataService and possibly the TraitS2299. Let me check EsocialEvents mapping. In EsocialEvents.php line 66, mapping "s2299" = "EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento". So which one is actually used? Let me search for usages of both entity classes. Actually the scope: our review group has three files; the entity change is in EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento. Both entities are different things. Let me determine which entity stores data from the S-2299 form (motivo_desligamento, pensão alimentícia), because a consumer may have relied on types. Wait, the twig `desligamento.html.twig` references `prevEvts.desligamento` fields like `percAliment` etc. There is also `member_guides_esocial/desligamento.html.twig`. Let me check which controller builds prevEvts for the termino templates. Search for `prevEvts`.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "prevEvts", "use_perl_regexp": true}
Note: The results have been truncated. Only showing first 100 results.
File: src/Controller/CompanyController.php
Match lines: 2
3257|        $prevEvts = $this->getEvtsData($company, $esocialTrabalhadorData);
3365|            'prevEvts' => $prevEvts,

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial/afastamento.html.twig
Match lines: 41
1|{#{{ dump(prevEvts) }}#}
18|            existing_unique_event_id: prevEvts.afastamento is not null ? prevEvts.afastamento.uniqueEventId : ''
36|                            value="{% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.dtIniAfast %}{{ prevEvts.afastamento.dtIniAfast|date('Y-m-d') }}{% endif %}">
45|                                    {% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.codMotAfast == motivo.getCodigo() %}
62|                                        {% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.infoMesmoMtv == 'S' %}
71|                                        {% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.infoMesmoMtv == 'N' %}
84|                                    {% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.tpAcidTransito == 1 %}
90|                                    {% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.tpAcidTransito == 2 %}
96|                                    {% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.tpAcidTransito == 3 %}
110|                                maxlength="255">{{ prevEvts.afastamento.observacao|default('') }}</textarea>
121|        {% if prevEvts.afastamento and (prevEvts.afastamento.dtInicioPerAquis or prevEvts.afastamento.dtFimPerAquis) %}
128|<fieldset id="periodoAquisitivoFields" class="collapse {% if prevEvts.afastamento and (prevEvts.afastamento.dtInicioPerAquis or prevEvts.afastamento.dtFimPerAquis) %}show{% endif %}">
135|                value="{% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.dtInicioPerAquis %}{{ prevEvts.afastamento.dtInicioPerAquis|date('Y-m-d') }}{% endif %}">
141|                value="{% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.dtFimPerAquis %}{{ prevEvts.afastamento.dtFimPerAquis|date('Y-m-d') }}{% endif %}">
150|        {% if prevEvts.afastamento and (prevEvts.afastamento.cnpjCess or prevEvts.afastamento.infOnus) %}
157|<fieldset id="cessaoRequisicaoFields" class="collapse {% if prevEvts.afastamento and (prevEvts.afastamento.cnpjCess or prevEvts.afastamento.infOnus) %}show{% endif %}">
163|                value="{% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.cnpjCess %}{{ prevEvts.afastamento.cnpjCess }}{% endif %}">
173|                <option value="1" {% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.infOnus == 1 %}selected{% endif %}>
176|                <option value="2" {% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.infOnus == 2 %}selected{% endif %}>
179|                <option value="3" {% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.infOnus == 3 %}selected{% endif %}>
191|        {% if prevEvts.afastamento and (prevEvts.afastamento.cnpjSind or prevEvts.afastamento.infOnusRemun) %}
198|<fieldset id="mandatoSindicalFields" class="collapse {% if prevEvts.afastamento and (prevEvts.afastamento.cnpjSind or prevEvts.afastamento.infOnusRemun) %}show{% endif %}">
204|                value="{% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.cnpjSind %}{{ prevEvts.afastamento.cnpjSind }}{% endif %}">
214|                <option value="1" {% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.infOnusRemun == 1 %}selected{% endif %}>
217|                <option value="2" {% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.infOnusRemun == 2 %}selected{% endif %}>
220|                <option value="3" {% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.infOnusRemun == 3 %}selected{% endif %}>
232|        {% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.cnpjMendElet %}
239|<fieldset id="mandatoEletivoFields" class="collapse {% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.cnpjMendElet %}show{% endif %}">
245|                value="{% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.cnpjMendElet %}{{ prevEvts.afastamento.cnpjMendElet }}{% endif %}">
256|                        {% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.indRemunCargo == 'S' %}
263|                        {% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.indRemunCargo == 'N' %}
277|        {% if prevEvts.afastamento and (prevEvts.afastamento.origRetif or prevEvts.afastamento.tpProc or prevEvts.afastamento.nrProc) %}
284|<fieldset id="retificacaoFields" class="collapse {% if prevEvts.afastamento and (prevEvts.afastamento.origRetif or prevEvts.afastamento.tpProc or prevEvts.afastamento.nrProc) %}show{% endif %}">
291|                <option value="1" {% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.origRetif == 1 %}selected{% endif %}>
294|                <option value="2" {% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.origRetif == 2 %}selected{% endif %}>
297|                <option value="3" {% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.origRetif == 3 %}selected{% endif %}>
307|                <option value="1" {% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.tpProc == 1 %}selected{% endif %}>
310|                <option value="2" {% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.tpProc == 2 %}selected{% endif %}>
313|                <option value="3" {% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.tpProc == 3 %}selected{% endif %}>
322|                value="{% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.nrProc %}{{ prevEvts.afastamento.nrProc }}{% endif %}">
339|                            value="{% if prevEvts.afastamento and prevEvts.afastamento.dtTermAfast %}{{ prevEvts.afastamento.dtTermAfast|date('Y-m-d') }}{% endif %}">

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial/desligamento.html.twig
Match lines: 1
100|                    existing_unique_event_id: prevEvts.desligamento is not null ? prevEvts.desligamento.uniqueEventId : ''

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial/desligamento_termino.html.twig
Match lines: 1
61|                    existing_unique_event_id: prevEvts.termino is not null ? prevEvts.termino.uniqueEventId : ''

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial/reintegracao.html.twig
Match lines: 12
18|            existing_unique_event_id: prevEvts.reintegracao is not null ? prevEvts.reintegracao.uniqueEventId : ''
35|                            {% if prevEvts.reintegracao and prevEvts.reintegracao.tpReint == 1 %}
41|                            {% if prevEvts.reintegracao and prevEvts.reintegracao.tpReint == 2 %}
47|                            {% if prevEvts.reintegracao and prevEvts.reintegracao.tpReint == 3 %}
53|                            {% if prevEvts.reintegracao and prevEvts.reintegracao.tpReint == 4 %}
59|                            {% if prevEvts.reintegracao and prevEvts.reintegracao.tpReint == 5 %}
65|                            {% if prevEvts.reintegracao and prevEvts.reintegracao.tpReint == 6 %}
71|                            {% if prevEvts.reintegracao and prevEvts.reintegracao.tpReint == 9 %}
95|                            value="{% if prevEvts.reintegracao and prevEvts.reintegracao.nrProcJud %}{{ prevEvts.reintegracao.nrProcJud }}{% endif %}">
117|                        value="{% if prevEvts.reintegracao and prevEvts.reintegracao.nrLeiAnistia %}{{ prevEvts.reintegracao.nrLeiAnistia }}{% endif %}">
135|                        value="{% if prevEvts.reintegracao and prevEvts.reintegracao.dtEfetRetorno %}{{ prevEvts.reintegracao.dtEfetRetorno|date('Y-m-d') }}{% endif %}">
155|                        value="{% if prevEvts.reintegracao and prevEvts.reintegracao.dtEfeito %}{{ prevEvts.reintegracao.dtEfeito|date('Y-m-d') }}{% endif %}">

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial/remuneracao.html.twig
Match lines: 1
36|                    {% set remuUniqueEventId = esocialUniqueEventIds['EsocialS2200EvtAdmissao']|default(prevEvts.remuneracao is not null ? prevEvts.remuneracao.uniqueEventId : '') %}

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial/trabalhador.html.twig
Match lines: 1
76|                        existing_unique_event_id: esocialUniqueEventIds['EsocialS2200EvtAdmissao']|default(prevEvts.admissao is not null ? prevEvts.admissao.uniqueEventId : '')

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_desligamento/aviso_previo.html.twig
Match lines: 4
13|                    value="{% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.dtAvPrv %}{{ prevEvts.desligamento.dtAvPrv|date('Y-m-d') }}{% endif %}">
26|                            {% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.indPagtoApi == 'S' %}
33|                            {% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.indPagtoApi == 'N' %}
51|                    value="{% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.dtProjFimApi %}{{ prevEvts.desligamento.dtProjFimApi|date('Y-m-d') }}{% endif %}">

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_desligamento/motivo_desligamento.html.twig
Match lines: 12
11|            {% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.mtvDeslig == '01' %}
17|            {% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.mtvDeslig == '02' %}
23|            {% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.mtvDeslig == '03' %}
29|            {% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.mtvDeslig == '04' %}
35|            {% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.mtvDeslig == '05' %}
41|            {% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.mtvDeslig == '06' %}
47|            {% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.mtvDeslig == '07' %}
53|            {% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.mtvDeslig == '99' %}
73|                    value="{% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.dtDeslig %}{{ prevEvts.desligamento.dtDeslig|date('Y-m-d') }}{% endif %}">
89|                    value="{% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.nrProcTrab %}{{ prevEvts.desligamento.nrProcTrab }}{% endif %}">
102|                {% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.indPdv == 'S' %}
109|                {% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.indPdv == 'N' %}

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_desligamento/mudanca_cpf.html.twig
Match lines: 1
16|                    value="{% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.novoCpf %}{{ prevEvts.desligamento.novoCpf }}{% endif %}">

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_desligamento/pensao_alimenticia.html.twig
Match lines: 6
11|            {% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.pensAlim == '0' %}
17|            {% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.pensAlim == '1' %}
23|            {% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.pensAlim == '2' %}
29|            {% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.pensAlim == '3' %}
48|                    value="{% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.percAliment %}{{ prevEvts.desligamento.percAliment }}{% endif %}">
63|                    value="{% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.vrAlim %}{{ prevEvts.desligamento.vrAlim }}{% endif %}">

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_desligamento/quarentena_remunerada.html.twig
Match lines: 4
11|                        {% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.indRemun == 1 %}
17|                        {% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.indRemun == 2 %}
23|                        {% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.indRemun == 3 %}
44|        value="{% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.dtFimRemun %}{{ prevEvts.desligamento.dtFimRemun|date('Y-m-d') }}{% endif %}">

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_desligamento/transferencia_titularidade.html.twig
Match lines: 1
16|                    value="{% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.cpfSubstituto %}{{ prevEvts.desligamento.cpfSubstituto }}{% endif %}">

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig
Match lines: 10
14|            {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '01' %}
20|            {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '02' %}
26|            {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '03' %}
32|            {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '04' %}
38|            {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '05' %}
44|            {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '06' %}
50|            {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '07' %}
56|            {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '99' %}
81|                        value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.dtTerm %}{{ prevEvts.termino.dtTerm|date('Y-m-d') }}{% endif %}">
99|                        value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab %}{{ prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab }}{% endif %}">

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/mudanca_cpf.html.twig
Match lines: 1
19|                    value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.novoCpf %}{{ prevEvts.termino.novoCpf }}{% endif %}">

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/pensao_alimenticia.html.twig
Match lines: 8
14|            {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.pensAlim == '0' %}
20|            {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.pensAlim == '1' %}
26|            {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.pensAlim == '2' %}
32|            {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.pensAlim == '3' %}
58|                    value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.percAliment %}{{ prevEvts.termino.percAliment }}{% endif %}"
59|                    {% if prevEvts.termino and (prevEvts.termino.pensAlim == '1' or prevEvts.termino.pensAlim == '3') %}
82|                    value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.vrAlim %}{{ prevEvts.termino.vrAlim }}{% endif %}"
83|                    {% if prevEvts.termino and (prevEvts.termino.pensAlim == '2' or prevEvts.termino.pensAlim == '3') %}

File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/quarentena_remunerada.html.twig
Match lines: 3
14|                    {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.indRemun == '1' %}
20|                    {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.indRemun == '2' %}
41|                    value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.dtFimRemun %}{{ prevEvts.termino.dtFimRemun|date('Y-m-d') }}{% endif %}">

file_find
Show Details
{"query_name": "EsocialS2299EvtDeslig"}
src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
Request #9 deepseek-v4-flash P:43.25K C:709 CR:38.53K CW:0 5532ms
Reasoning
The twig fix: In `motivo_desligamento.html.twig` of `member_guides_esocial_termino`, all the other references already use `prevEvts.termino and ...`; the bug was checking `prevEvts.desligamento` for the nrProcTrab value but using `prevEvts.termino`. Also notice in `pensao_alimenticia.html.twig` they use `prevEvts.termino.percAliment`. Wait, does EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino have percAliment? Let's check. Actually this file with termino refers to S-2399 TSV Termino event type presumably, and those templates render sections from a controller. Let me check what prevEvts is populated with, from CompanyController getEvtsData. The twig change is clearly a correct bugfix: `prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` → the old code would fatal if `prevEvts.termino` null. In Twig, accessing attribute on null returns null and triggers an error only in strict mode? Actually in Twig, accessing an attribute/property on null returns null by default (with a warning? no - Twig returns null unless strict_variables is enabled). Wait, `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` when termino is null: Twig attribute access on null returns null (in non-strict mode), so no fatal error. Hmm. Actually, in Twig, when you do `foo.bar` and foo is null, it returns null without error unless strict_variables is enabled. So the original code wouldn't error; but there is likely `strict_variables` enabled in some env, or the issue was something else. Anyway, this is a bugfix within scope per the PR description ("Corrigido erro ao abrir a aba de desligamento quando prevEvts.termino ainda não existe"). Good. Now this file: it appears both `member_guides_esocial_termino` and `member_guides_esocial_desligamento` templates are used in a page that shows the member guides esocial termino. The fix looks consistent: now checks prevEvts.termino like the rest of the same template. So no issue with the twig change. Now, let me check the test change: added `'descaracter_suspect' => '1'` to `details`. And renamed the test method to "...ComSuspeitaExigeCaracterizar". Need to know validator behavior: when `descaracter_suspect == '1'` (suspeita de descaracterização), medical deepening requires characterization. Seems reasonable. The commit title says "fix(tests): add suspect characterization field". Let's examine SsmaEventValidator to confirm this field exists and semantics. Let me search SsmaEventValidator for descaracter_suspect.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "descaracter_suspect"}
File: GUIA_MERGE_TAB_OCCURRENCES.md
Match lines: 2
232|     data-descaracter-suspect="{{ occ.descaracter_suspect|default(0) }}"
252|     data-descaracter-suspect="{{ occ.descaracter_suspect|default(0) }}"

File: RESUMO_MAURICIO_MARCOS.md
Match lines: 1
136|     data-descaracter-suspect="{{ occ.descaracter_suspect|default(0) }}"

File: docs/ssma/CORRECOES-FECHAMENTO-FIGMA-PENDENTES.md
Match lines: 1
81|| Há suspeita de descaracterização | `suspeita_sim` | `descaracter_suspect = 1` |

File: docs/ssma/ocorrencia-06-tudo-na-caixinha-descaracter.md
Match lines: 1
27|| Persistência ocorrência | `#ev_descaracter_suspect` + `#ev_descaracterizado` (hiddens sincronizados) |

File: docs/ssma/ocorrencia-07-suspeita-descaracterizacao-ui.md
Match lines: 1
20|| Suspeita marcada | `descaracter_suspect` | `1` |

File: docs/ssma/ocorrencia-08-filtro-aprofundamento-descaracter.md
Match lines: 1
14|| Há suspeita de descaracterização | `suspeita_sim` | `descaracter_suspect = 1` |

File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 6
14187|            'descaracter_suspect'    => !empty($details['descaracter_suspect']) ? 1 : 0,
26687|            'injured_person_details', 'descaracter_suspect', 'descaracterizado', 'descaracter_comment', 'witness_ids',
26783|                foreach (['descaracter_suspect', 'descaracterizado', 'descaracter_comment'] as $descKey) {
26795|        if (isset($details['descaracter_suspect'])) {
26796|            $details['descaracter_suspect'] = !empty($details['descaracter_suspect']) && $details['descaracter_suspect'] !== '0' ? 1 : 0;
27031|            'descaracter_suspect',

File: src/Service/Ssma/Export/SsmaOccurrenceExportRowMapper.php
Match lines: 1
156|            'ap_descaracter_suspect' => SsmaOccurrenceExportLabels::boolLabel($d['descaracter_suspect'] ?? null),

File: src/Service/Ssma/Export/SsmaOccurrenceExportSchema.php
Match lines: 1
76|        'ap_descaracter_suspect' => 'Suspeita de descaracterização?',

File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php
Match lines: 2
648|                $suspect = ($payload['descaracter_suspect'] ?? '0') === '1';
2031|        $payload['descaracter_suspect'] = !empty($details['descaracter_suspect']) ? '1' : '0';

File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaEventService.php
Match lines: 5
161|            'descaracter_suspect', 'descaracterizado', 'descaracter_comment',
186|        if (!empty($card['descaracter_suspect'])) {
187|            $details['descaracter_suspect'] = 1;
188|        } elseif (array_key_exists('descaracter_suspect', $card)) {
189|            $details['descaracter_suspect'] = 0;

File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaEventValidator.php
Match lines: 1
719|            $hasSuspect = !empty($d['descaracter_suspect']) && $d['descaracter_suspect'] !== '0';

File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig
Match lines: 11
291|                <input class="form-check-input" type="checkbox" id="ev_descaracter_suspect" name="ev_descaracter_suspect" value="1">
292|                <label class="form-check-label" for="ev_descaracter_suspect">Há suspeita de descaracterização do acidente?</label>
2197|            descaracter_suspect: evIsDescaracterSuspectChecked() ? 1 : 0,
2905|        var el = document.getElementById('ev_descaracter_suspect');
5728|        var suspectChk = document.getElementById('ev_descaracter_suspect');
5746|            var globalChk = document.getElementById('ev_descaracter_suspect');
6474|        var suspectRaw = det.descaracter_suspect != null ? det.descaracter_suspect : data.descaracter_suspect;
6476|        evSetChk('ev_descaracter_suspect', suspectOn);
7092|            var suspectEl = document.getElementById('ev_descaracter_suspect');
7108|            payload.descaracter_suspect = evIsDescaracterSuspectChecked() ? 1 : 0;
7125|                suspectEl.checked = !!payload.descaracter_suspect;

File: templates/ssma/occurrence/tabs/_tab_occurrences.html.twig
Match lines: 3
455|                     data-descaracter-suspect="{{ occ.descaracter_suspect|default(0) }}"
1636|                ' data-descaracter-suspect="' + escapeHtml(String(occurrenceData.descaracter_suspect ? 1 : 0)) + '"' +
1714|            rowNode.setAttribute('data-descaracter-suspect', occurrenceData.descaracter_suspect ? '1' : '0');

File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php
Match lines: 1
878|                'descaracter_suspect'   => '1',

file_find
Show Details
{"query_name": "SsmaEventValidator"}
src/Service/Ssma/SsmaEventValidator.php
tests/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php
tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php
Request #10 deepseek-v4-flash P:45.43K C:134 CR:43.9K CW:0 1696ms
Reasoning
Let me look at the SsmaEventValidator context around line 719 to understand validation logic: when `aprofundamento_complete` is true and there is suspect of descaracterization, must be characterized.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 780, "file_path": "src/Service/Ssma/SsmaEventValidator.php", "start_line": 640}
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaEventValidator.php (Total lines: 887)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 640-780
640|                    }
641|                    if (!empty($part['face_zones'])) {
642|                        if ($reg !== 'FACE') {
643|                            $errors[] = 'Zonas de face só são permitidas quando a região é Face.';
644|                        } else {
645|                            foreach (array_filter(array_map('trim', explode(',', (string) $part['face_zones']))) as $v) {
646|                                if (!\in_array($v, $allowedFace, true)) {
647|                                    $errors[] = 'Zona de face inválida: ' . $v;
648|                                }
649|                            }
650|                        }
651|                    }
652|                    if (!empty($part['olhos_zones'])) {
653|                        if ($reg !== 'OLHOS') {
654|                            $errors[] = 'Zonas de olhos só são permitidas quando a região é Olhos.';
655|                        } else {
656|                            foreach (array_filter(array_map('trim', explode(',', (string) $part['olhos_zones']))) as $v) {
657|                                if (!\in_array($v, $allowedOlhos, true)) {
658|                                    $errors[] = 'Zona de olhos inválida: ' . $v;
659|                                }
660|                            }
661|                        }
662|                    }
663|                }
664|            }
665|        }
666|
667|        $workLeave = strtoupper(trim((string) ($d['work_leave'] ?? '')));
668|        $injClass    = strtoupper(trim((string) ($d['injury_classification'] ?? '')));
669|        if ($hadInjury && $injClass === '') {
670|            $errors[] = 'Classificação da lesão é obrigatória quando há lesão.';
671|        }
672|        if ($workLeave === 'PARCIAL') {
673|            $errors[] = 'Afastamento parcial não é mais permitido. Use Com ou Sem afastamento.';
674|        }
675|        if ($workLeave !== '' && !\in_array($workLeave, ['NAO', 'TOTAL'], true)) {
676|            $errors[] = 'Licença inválida. Use Sem afastamento ou Com afastamento total.';
677|        }
678|        if ($workLeave === 'NAO' && \in_array($injClass, ['LTI', 'LTI_FATALIDADE', 'LTI_INCAPACITANTE', 'FAT'], true)) {
679|            $errors[] = 'LTI/FAT não é permitido quando a licença é Sem afastamento.';
680|        }
681|        if ($workLeave === 'TOTAL' && $injClass !== '' && !\in_array($injClass, ['LTI', 'LTI_FATALIDADE', 'LTI_INCAPACITANTE', 'FAT'], true)) {
682|            $errors[] = 'Com afastamento total, a classificação deve ser FAT ou LTI — Afastamento.';
683|        }
684|        if ($workLeave === 'NAO' && $injClass !== '' && !\in_array($injClass, ['FAC', 'MTC', 'RWC'], true)) {
685|            $errors[] = 'Sem afastamento, use apenas FAC, MTC ou RWC.';
686|        }
687|
688|        if ($hadInjury) {
689|            if (isset($d['body_location_detail']) && $d['body_location_detail'] !== null && $d['body_location_detail'] !== '') {
690|                if (!\is_string($d['body_location_detail'])) {
691|                    $errors[] = 'Detalhe da localização no corpo deve ser texto.';
692|                } elseif (mb_strlen((string) $d['body_location_detail']) > 2000) {
693|                    $errors[] = 'Detalhe da localização no corpo: no máximo 2000 caracteres.';
694|                }
695|            }
696|            /* hand_finger / foot_toe no nível details: legado (MAO/PE sem lado); preferir por body_parts[]. */
697|            $allowedHandFlat = ['POLEGAR', 'INDICADOR', 'MEDIO', 'ANULAR', 'MINIMO'];
698|            $allowedFootFlat = ['HALUX', 'SEGUNDO_DEDO', 'TERCEIRO_DEDO', 'QUARTO_DEDO', 'MINIMO_PE'];
699|            if (!empty($d['hand_finger'])) {
700|                foreach (array_filter(array_map('trim', explode(',', (string) $d['hand_finger']))) as $v) {
701|                    if (!\in_array($v, $allowedHandFlat, true)) {
702|                        $errors[] = 'Dedo da mão inválido: ' . $v;
703|                    }
704|                }
705|            }
706|            if (!empty($d['foot_toe'])) {
707|                foreach (array_filter(array_map('trim', explode(',', (string) $d['foot_toe']))) as $v) {
708|                    if (!\in_array($v, $allowedFootFlat, true)) {
709|                        $errors[] = 'Dedo do pé inválido: ' . $v;
710|                    }
711|                }
712|            }
713|        }
714|
715|        $descVal = array_key_exists('descaracterizado', $d) ? (string) $d['descaracterizado'] : '';
716|        // Caracterizar é do médico no aprofundamento dedicado — não na criação.
717|        // Sim/Não + comentário só são obrigatórios quando há suspeita de descaracterização marcada.
718|        if (!empty($data['aprofundamento_only'])) {
719|            $hasSuspect = !empty($d['descaracter_suspect']) && $d['descaracter_suspect'] !== '0';
720|            if ($hasSuspect) {
721|                if (!\in_array($descVal, ['0', '1'], true)) {
722|                    $errors[] = 'Informe se o evento é caracterizado como acidente (Sim/Não).';
723|                } else {
724|                    $comment = trim((string) ($d['descaracter_comment'] ?? ''));
725|                    if ($comment === '') {
726|                        $errors[] = 'Comentário de caracterização do acidente é obrigatório.';
727|                    }
728|                }
729|            }
730|        }
731|
732|        return $errors;
733|    }
734|
735|    private function validateAcidenteMaterial(array $d): array
736|    {
737|        $errors = [];
738|
739|        if (empty($d['potential_severity']) || !PotentialSeverityEnum::isValid($d['potential_severity'])) {
740|            $errors[] = 'Consequência potencial / Gravidade é obrigatória. Selecione uma opção válida.';
741|        }
742|
743|        if (empty($d['asset_type'])) {
744|            $errors[] = 'Tipo de ativo é obrigatório para Acidente Material.';
745|        }
746|        if (!isset($d['operational_impact'])) {
747|            $errors[] = 'Impacto operacional é obrigatório.';
748|        }
749|        // Barreira que falhou removida do formulário AM (Brenda) — legado opcional.
750|        if (!empty($d['failed_barrier']) && !FailedBarrierEnum::isValid((string) $d['failed_barrier'])) {
751|            $errors[] = 'Barreira que falhou: valor inválido.';
752|        }
753|        if (empty($d['barrier_type']) || !BarrierTypeEnum::isValid((string) $d['barrier_type'])) {
754|            $errors[] = 'Tipo de barreira é obrigatório. Selecione uma opção válida.';
755|        }
756|
757|        return $errors;
758|    }
759|
760|    private function validateAcidenteAmbiental(array $d): array
761|    {
762|        $errors = [];
763|
764|        if (empty($d['potential_severity']) || !PotentialSeverityEnum::isValid($d['potential_severity'])) {
765|            $errors[] = 'Consequência potencial / Gravidade é obrigatória. Selecione uma opção válida.';
766|        }
767|
768|        if (empty($d['environmental_medium']) || !EnvironmentalMediumEnum::isValid((string) $d['environmental_medium'])) {
769|            $errors[] = 'Meio ambiental é obrigatório. Selecione uma opção válida.';
770|        }
771|        // Formulário novo envia PollutantTypeEnum. Texto livre já gravado (legado) também
772|        // passa, para não bloquear re-save de eventos antigos.
773|        $pollutant = trim((string) ($d['pollutant_type'] ?? ''));
774|        if ($pollutant === '') {
775|            $errors[] = 'Tipo de poluente é obrigatório. Selecione uma opção válida.';
776|        }
777|        if (!isset($d['containment_done'])) {
778|            $errors[] = 'Informe se houve contenção.';
779|        }
780|        // external_impact: removido do cadastro (Parte 1 C7) — opcional/legado, não bloqueia save.
Request #11 deepseek-v4-flash P:47.77K C:1.09K CR:45.44K CW:0 9033ms
Reasoning
The validator test change: In the test `testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoMedicoComSuspeitaExigeCaracterizar`, the scenario: `aprofundamento_only` true, `descaracter_suspect` = '1', so `hasSuspect` true. The validation requires `descaracterizado` in ['0','1'] and a comment. But wait — the test payload does NOT provide `descaracterizado` and does NOT provide `descaracter_comment`. So `$descVal = ''`, not in ['0','1'], so error 'Informe se o evento é caracterizado como acidente (Sim/Não).' The test asserts this error is present via `str_contains($errors, 'caracterizado como acidente')`. The test expects errors to exist. Good, test passes. But hold on: I should compare the old test name `testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoMedicoExigeCaracterizar` which did not have `descaracter_suspect`. In that case, `$hasSuspect` would be false, and no error would occur, so the test asserting error present would fail. So the fix adds `descaracter_suspect => '1'`, making the test consistent with the current validation logic that only requires characterization when suspicion is flagged. This is a test-only change — aligning with the new field semantics. Fine. Now check whether this test is in scope: commit "fix(tests): add suspect characterization field". The rest of PR is offboarding. Ssma test tweak seems unrelated to offboarding... Wait: this test is in the review group but the commit "747b40fb40 fix(tests): add suspect characterization field" suggests it was done as part of making the validator change. But wait, the validator file (SsmaEventValidator) is not changed in this PR — the logic at line 718-730 already existed? Let me verify by checking git diff — the validator isn't in the changed files list. So this PR is only adjusting the test to match current validator behavior (which apparently already requires descaracter only when suspect). Maybe a previous PR introduced this behavior and the test wasn't updated until now. It might be an out-of-scope test fix but harmless. Actually wait—maybe the test used to pass with the validator previously requiring characterização always during `aprofundamento_only`, and now the validator's behavior changed (in a different, unmerged PR?) No — validator unchanged here. If the test previously passed (without descaracter_suspect), then the validator at that time must have flagged without suspect. But current validator does not. So either the test was failing on this branch before the fix (i.e., some prior change to the validator landed making the test outdated, and this PR fixes the test). That is a test alignment fix, consistent with the PR scope described in "fix(tests)". It's low priority. But is it in-scope? The PR is offboarding S-2299. An unrelated Ssma validator test tweak might be "de passagem". Given user rules: "Escopo da PR" — a change not related to the declared scope should be flagged. However, the commit history included "747b40fb40 fix(tests): add suspect characterization field" in this PR. This is a small test-only change. Hmm. Let me carefully understand: was this test failing prior to the change? If the validator's requirement (caracterização only when suspect) is newer code (perhaps in a parallel feature already merged to new_staging2), then the test fix is needed to keep CI green. But it's not really offboarding-related. It could be flagged as out of scope but low severity. Actually, before flagging, let me confirm whether the test previously passing and this change might mask a real regression. Since validator unchanged, test just adds missing required input to trigger the expected behavior. It's a legitimate test alignment, i.e., makes test reflect actual contract. Not a bug. I should also verify whether there is another test in same file that tests the non-suspect case (`testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoMedico...` with no suspect expects no caracterizar error) at lines 760-846. That test ends with `assertFalse(... 'caracterizado como acidente')` — i.e., without `descaracter_suspect`, expect no caracterizar error. Wait, line 843-846 shows assertFalse that caracterização not required. But hold on, does that test also have aprofundamento_only? Let me read the test above (from ~760 to 846) to understand the full picture, to make sure the added field is coherent and the name change is consistent.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 848, "file_path": "tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php", "start_line": 740}
File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php (Total lines: 990)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 740-848
740|            'location'                => 'Área externa',
741|            'description'             => 'Vazamento legado',
742|            'consequence'             => 'MEDIO',
743|            'aprofundamento_complete' => true,
744|            'details'                 => [
745|                'activity'              => 'Transferência',
746|                'approach'              => 'CORRECAO_OPERACIONAL',
747|                'environmental_medium'  => 'SOLO',
748|                'pollutant_type'        => 'Óleo hidráulico',
749|                'containment_done'      => true,
750|                'potential_severity'    => 'MEDIO',
751|                'potential_consequence' => 'ALTO',
752|                'barrier_type'          => 'FISICA',
753|            ],
754|        ]);
755|
756|        self::assertSame(
757|            [],
758|            $errors,
759|            'Poluente free-text legado deve permitir re-save. Erros: ' . implode(' | ', $errors)
760|        );
761|    }
762|
763|    public function testAcidenteAmbientalRejeitaPollutantVazio(): void
764|    {
765|        $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
766|
767|        $errors = $validator->validate([
768|            'type'                    => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_AMBIENTAL,
769|            'origin'                  => 'MANUAL',
770|            'datetime'                => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
771|            'location'                => 'Área externa',
772|            'description'             => 'Sem poluente',
773|            'consequence'             => 'MEDIO',
774|            'aprofundamento_complete' => true,
775|            'details'                 => [
776|                'activity'              => 'Transferência',
777|                'approach'              => 'CORRECAO_OPERACIONAL',
778|                'environmental_medium'  => 'SOLO',
779|                'pollutant_type'        => '',
780|                'containment_done'      => true,
781|                'potential_severity'    => 'MEDIO',
782|                'potential_consequence' => 'MEDIO',
783|                'barrier_type'          => 'FISICA',
784|            ],
785|        ]);
786|
787|        self::assertNotSame([], $errors);
788|        self::assertTrue(
789|            (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'poluente')),
790|            'Deve exigir tipo de poluente. Erros: ' . implode(' | ', $errors)
791|        );
792|    }
793|
794|    public function testToastAprofundamentoIncompletoUsaMensagensHumanasDoPrint(): void
795|    {
796|        $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
797|
798|        $errors = $validator->validate([
799|            'type'                    => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_PESSOAL,
800|            'origin'                  => 'MANUAL',
801|            'datetime'                => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
802|            'location'                => 'Linha 2',
803|            'description'             => 'Toast da imagem — etapa 2 incompleta',
804|            'aprofundamento_complete' => true,
805|            'details'                 => [
806|                'activity'    => 'Operação de corte',
807|                'approach'    => 'CORRECAO_OPERACIONAL',
808|                'person_id'   => '101',
809|                'person_type' => 'COLABORADOR',
810|                'had_injury'  => true,
811|            ],
812|        ]);
813|
814|        $joined = implode("\n", $errors);
815|
816|        // Não pode mais aparecer o texto técnico do print antigo.
817|        self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.injury_type:', $joined);
818|        self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.injury_classification:', $joined);
819|        self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.descaracterizado:', $joined);
820|        self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.potential_consequence:', $joined);
821|        self::assertStringNotContainsString('consequence: obrigatório', $joined);
822|
823|        self::assertTrue(
824|            (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Consequência real é obrigatória')),
825|            "Faltou mensagem de consequência real. Erros:\n{$joined}"
826|        );
827|        self::assertTrue(
828|            (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Consequência potencial é obrigatória')),
829|            "Faltou mensagem de consequência potencial. Erros:\n{$joined}"
830|        );
831|        self::assertTrue(
832|            (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Consequência potencial / Gravidade é obrigatória')),
833|            "Faltou mensagem de gravidade. Erros:\n{$joined}"
834|        );
835|        self::assertTrue(
836|            (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Tipo de lesão é obrigatório quando há lesão')),
837|            "Faltou mensagem humana de tipo de lesão. Erros:\n{$joined}"
838|        );
839|        self::assertTrue(
840|            (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Classificação da lesão é obrigatória quando há lesão')),
841|            "Faltou mensagem humana de classificação. Erros:\n{$joined}"
842|        );
843|        self::assertFalse(
844|            (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'caracterizado como acidente')),
845|            "Caracterizar não deve ser exigido na criação. Erros:\n{$joined}"
846|        );
847|    }
848|
Request #12 deepseek-v4-flash P:50.35K C:1.12K CR:48.77K CW:0 9026ms
Reasoning
OK, this all looks coherent. The test changes are low risk and aligned with existing validator behavior. Now let me focus on the entity change more carefully and consider whether there might be a real regression in reachable consumers of `getPercAliment()` / `getVrAlim()` / `setPercAliment()` / `setVrAlim()` of `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento`: Callers: 1. `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::saveEventS2299` - set from $data; now the param is coerced (string). `$data['percAliment']` may come from a form as string. No issue. 2. `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::getFlowableDataForTemplate` - passes through to array; previously coerced int; now string. FlowableVariablesService line 19737-19738 and 19792-19793 assign it into arrays. Also formatters `formatDouble('percAliment', $eventData['percAliment'] ?? 0.0, 'global')` at 15208 and 15284. 3. `AutomationExecutionService` applyEsocialS2299Payload — setter with decimalOrNull returning "30.00" format. But note applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue only sets when getter returns null/'' OR onlyEmptyFields=false. Compare `$currentValue = $getter();` returns string now. That is fine. One potential problem: previously setter was `?int`. If anywhere persisted value "30.50" and read by getter returning int, they got 30 (precision loss). Now they'd read "30.50". Consumers that used it as e.g. `round()` would still work. Where might a consumer break? Since it's a decimal column and code is mixed, previously the getters were typed `?int` which means any caller who passed the value through `json_encode` got an int. Now they get a string like "30.00". JSON consumers downstream (e.g., the flow formatters which produce eventData to external systems, or frontend JS that treats vrAlim as numeric). Look at FlowableVariablesService line 19737-19738 context and templates desligamento: `templates/company/member_guides_esocial/desligamento.html.twig` uses values; frontend handles strings fine. But there's also ESocialDataService for `EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` (an older entity?) — not this entity. Hmm wait, actually let me check which entity is used in `treatS2299Data`. Import is `App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDeslig`. That's another file? The file_find only found EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento (the class file). But the import says `App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` — maybe there's a file named EsocialS2299EvtDeslig.php. Let me search. Actually, no. I should not spend too much. Let me check whether the DB column change is really aligned; the getters returning `?string` is the Doctrine correct type for decimal. The change of method signature type-hint is fine and improves correctness. Wait — but there's a subtle issue: are there other entity classes with the same column that still declare `?int`? EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino has same pattern and remains `?int`. That's fine as unchanged. Now consider the automation idempotency aspect (in AutomationExecutionService not in review group, so skip unless relevant). Now, one more potential concern about the entity type change: Since `percAliment` column is decimal(10,2), with setter `?string` but the same property may receive `int` from old callers: In PHP 8 coercive typing, int→string is allowed. In strict_types? The file doesn't declare `declare(strict_types=1)` (we didn't see it at top of entity; only namespace). So weak mode. fine. Now what about `applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue` with `onlyEmptyFields` and current value being a numeric string from DB e.g., "30.00": `$currentValue !== ''` true, so skip. Good. Potential real issue: value stored previously via int coercion may have lost centavos (e.g., 30.50 -> 30.00), but new records store correctly. That's a fix. I think the entity change is a legit fix; but is there any real bug? Let's examine whether this change might break existing consumers that do arithmetic or strict comparison. Let me look at FlowableVariablesService around 19730-19800 to see how percAliment values flow into arrays and formatDouble.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 19810, "file_path": "src/Service/FlowableServices/FlowableVariablesService.php", "start_line": 19710}
File: src/Service/FlowableServices/FlowableVariablesService.php (Total lines: 20241)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 19710-19810
19710|            }
19711|        }
19712|
19713|        if ($dateTo) {
19714|            $dateToObj = \DateTime::createFromFormat('Y-m-d', $dateTo);
19715|            if ($dateToObj) {
19716|                $qb2299->andWhere('(DATE(e.createdAt) <= :dateTo OR DATE(e.dtDeslig) <= :dateTo)')
19717|                    ->setParameter('dateTo', $dateToObj->format('Y-m-d'));
19718|            }
19719|        }
19720|
19721|        $s2299Events = $qb2299->orderBy('e.createdAt', 'DESC')->getQuery()->getResult();
19722|
19723|        foreach ($s2299Events as $event) {
19724|            $trabalhador = $event->getEsocialTrabalhador();
19725|            $dadosTrabalhador = $trabalhador ? $trabalhador->getDadosTrabalhador() : null;
19726|
19727|            $terminationEvents[] = [
19728|                'id' => $event->getId(),
19729|                'eventType' => 's2299',
19730|                'eventName' => 'Desligamento',
19731|                'modo' => $event->getModo(),
19732|                'status' => $event->getStatus(),
19733|                'dtDeslig' => $event->getDtDeslig()?->format('Y-m-d'),
19734|                'dtAvPrv' => $event->getDtAvPrv()?->format('Y-m-d'),
19735|                'mtvDeslig' => $event->getMtvDeslig(),
19736|                'pensAlim' => $event->getPensAlim(),
19737|                'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),
19738|                'vrAlim' => $event->getVrAlim(),
19739|                'nrProcTrab' => $event->getNrProcTrab(),
19740|                'novoCpf' => $event->getNovoCpf(),
19741|                'indRemun' => $event->getIndRemun(),
19742|                'createdAt' => $event->getCreatedAt()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s'),
19743|                'updatedAt' => $event->getUpdatedAt()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s'),
19744|                'batchId' => $event->getBatch()?->getId(),
19745|                'trabalhador' => $trabalhador ? [
19746|                    'id' => $trabalhador->getId(),
19747|                    'cpfTrab' => $dadosTrabalhador ? $dadosTrabalhador->getCpfTrab() : null,
19748|                    'nmTrab' => $dadosTrabalhador ? $dadosTrabalhador->getNmTrab() : null,
19749|                ] : null,
19750|                'description' => 'Desligamento do trabalhador',
19751|            ];
19752|        }
19753|
19754|        // Buscar eventos S-2399 (Término de TSV)
19755|        $s2399Repo = $em->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino::class);
19756|        $qb2399 = $s2399Repo->createQueryBuilder('e')
19757|            ->where('e.company = :company')
19758|            ->setParameter('company', $company);
19759|
19760|        if ($dateFrom) {
19761|            $dateFromObj = \DateTime::createFromFormat('Y-m-d', $dateFrom);
19762|            if ($dateFromObj) {
19763|                $qb2399->andWhere('(DATE(e.createdAt) >= :dateFrom OR DATE(e.dtTerm) >= :dateFrom)')
19764|                    ->setParameter('dateFrom', $dateFromObj->format('Y-m-d'));
19765|            }
19766|        }
19767|
19768|        if ($dateTo) {
19769|            $dateToObj = \DateTime::createFromFormat('Y-m-d', $dateTo);
19770|            if ($dateToObj) {
19771|                $qb2399->andWhere('(DATE(e.createdAt) <= :dateTo OR DATE(e.dtTerm) <= :dateTo)')
19772|                    ->setParameter('dateTo', $dateToObj->format('Y-m-d'));
19773|            }
19774|        }
19775|
19776|        $s2399Events = $qb2399->orderBy('e.createdAt', 'DESC')->getQuery()->getResult();
19777|
19778|        foreach ($s2399Events as $event) {
19779|            $dadosRemuneracao = $event->getDadosRemuneracao();
19780|            $trabalhador = $dadosRemuneracao ? $dadosRemuneracao->getEsocialTrabalhador() : null;
19781|            $dadosTrabalhador = $trabalhador ? $trabalhador->getDadosTrabalhador() : null;
19782|
19783|            $terminationEvents[] = [
19784|                'id' => $event->getId(),
19785|                'eventType' => 's2399',
19786|                'eventName' => 'Término de TSV',
19787|                'modo' => $event->getModo(),
19788|                'status' => $event->getStatus(),
19789|                'dtTerm' => $event->getDtTerm()?->format('Y-m-d'),
19790|                'mtvDesligTsv' => $event->getMtvDesligTsv(),
19791|                'pensAlim' => $event->getPensAlim(),
19792|                'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),
19793|                'vrAlim' => $event->getVrAlim(),
19794|                'nrProcTrab' => $event->getNrProcTrab(),
19795|                'novoCpf' => $event->getNovoCpf(),
19796|                'indRemun' => $event->getIndRemun(),
19797|                'dtFimRemun' => $event->getDtFimRemun()?->format('Y-m-d'),
19798|                'createdAt' => $event->getCreatedAt()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s'),
19799|                'updatedAt' => $event->getUpdatedAt()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s'),
19800|                'batchId' => $event->getBatch()?->getId(),
19801|                'trabalhador' => $trabalhador ? [
19802|                    'id' => $trabalhador->getId(),
19803|                    'cpfTrab' => $dadosTrabalhador ? $dadosTrabalhador->getCpfTrab() : null,
19804|                    'nmTrab' => $dadosTrabalhador ? $dadosTrabalhador->getNmTrab() : null,
19805|                ] : null,
19806|                'description' => 'Término de trabalhador sem vínculo',
19807|            ];
19808|        }
19809|
19810|        // Ordenar todos os eventos por data de desligamento/término ou criação (mais recente primeiro)
Request #13 deepseek-v4-flash P:53.28K C:951 CR:51.46K CW:0 7531ms
Reasoning
These consumers simply pass values into arrays. Previously they were ints (coerced from decimals by the getter); now they will be strings like "30.00". This is displayed and likely fed to JSON for flow variables. Consumers probably tolerant. Now let me consider whether the change to string return is a true mismatch with DB? Doctrine decimal returns strings. Good. Wait — now let me reconsider: could the change actually introduce a behavior change that matters: `FlowableVariablesService` at lines 15208, 15284 uses formatDouble with eventData from some other source (probably retrieved from the automation payload key). Not directly this getter. Overall, the entity change is low risk; it's actually correcting the type contract to match decimal storage, and used by automation's decimalOrNull helper which returns strings. I wouldn't block. Hmm. Let me consider one thing though: does this repository or any place rely on `(int) $event->getVrAlim()` comparisons etc.? For example, the template `member_guides_esocial_termino/pensao_alimenticia.html.twig` uses `prevEvts.termino.percAliment` for value display. Actually `prevEvts.termino` is EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino (not this entity) - and that entity getters still int. For the S2299 desligamento entity, the templates under `member_guides_esocial_desligamento/pensao_alimenticia.html.twig` use prevEvts.desligamento.percAliment; desligamento refers to EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento. Wait — hold on. Is prevEvts.desligamento an instance of EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento or the older `EsocialS2299EvtDeslig`? Let me check getEvtsData in CompanyController to see what desligamento/termino are set to. Actually, given the twig bug fix changed the termino motive template's condition from desligamento to termino, the termino template corresponds to the S-2399 "Término de TSV" event; so termino = EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino. And the desligamento = EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento presumably. Wait, but the template `member_guides_esocial_termino/pensao_alimenticia.html.twig` references `prevEvts.termino.percAliment` — S2399 entity has percAliment (int typed). Fine. So this fix is basically: template meant to show Termino (S2399) data; old code guarded on `prevEvts.desligamento` and then read `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab`. Since the guard was wrong, when termino was present but desligamento null, guard prevented fill... Actually the bug was the opposite: the template is in the termino tab. When `prevEvts.desligamento` is null (no S-2299 desligamento event) but a termino exists, previously the value wouldn't be filled. And if termino is null but desligamento exists, `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` would be null-attribute access. Wait — in the old code, condition `prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab`: if desligamento non-null but termino null, Twig access `null.nrProcTrab` yields null (non-strict) → value blank, no crash; if strict_variables on → throws. But most likely the scenario: the termino tab always had prevEvts.termino? No — the fix aligns the guard with actual object used. Good fix; all other checks in this file already use termino. OK so the twig change is right, in-scope, no problem. Let me confirm the file that includes these templates to be certain prevEvts always defined with keys desligamento/termino. Let me look at CompanyController around line 3257.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 3380, "file_path": "src/Controller/CompanyController.php", "start_line": 3220}
File: src/Controller/CompanyController.php (Total lines: 7133)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 3220-3380
3220|                    'id' => $member_res->getRoleMember()->getId(),
3221|                    'name' => $member_res->getRoleMember()->getName(),
3222|                    'cbo' => $member_res->getRoleMember()->getCbo(),
3223|                ]
3224|                : null,
3225|            'active' => $member_res->getEnabled(),
3226|            'team' => $member_res->getTeams(),
3227|            'compiled_teams' => $compiled_teams,
3228|            'group' => $member_res->getGroups(),
3229|            'job_level' => $member_res->getJobLevel(),
3230|            'department' => $member_res->getDepartment(),
3231|            'hasCrown' => $member_res->getHasCrown() ?? false,
3232|            'linkedProviderCompany' => $linkedProviderCompanyLabel,
3233|            'linkedCompanyDisplay' => $linkedCompanyDisplay,
3234|            'employmentBond' => $member_res->getEmploymentBond(),
3235|            'employmentBondLabel' => $employmentBondLabel,
3236|        ];
3237|        $compiled_teams = [];
3238|        foreach ($teams as $t) {
3239|            $compiled_teams[$t->getId()] = $t->getName();
3240|        }
3241|
3242|        $esocialTablesData = $this->getEsocialTablesData();
3243|        $esocialTrabalhador = $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosTrabalhador::class)->findBy(['companyMember' => $companyMember['id']]);
3244|        // Busca o Profile apenas se o CompanyMember tiver um User associado
3245|        $profileData = null;
3246|        if ($member_res->getUser()) {
3247|            $profileData = $em->getRepository(Profile::class)->findOneBy(['user' => $member_res->getUser()->getId()]);
3248|        }
3249|        
3250|        // Aplica o merge inteligente dos dados
3251|        $esocialTrabalhadorData = $this->mergeEsocialTrabalhadorData($esocialTrabalhador, $profileData);
3252|        
3253|        $esocialRemuneracaoData = $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class)->findByTrabalhadorArray($esocialTrabalhador);
3254|        $esocialRubricasData = $em->getRepository(EsocialS1010EvtTabRubrica::class)->findBy(['company' => $company]);
3255|        $esocialEstabData = $em->getRepository(EsocialS1005EvtTabEstab::class)->findByEventoEnviado($company);
3256|        $categorias = $em->getRepository(EsocialCategoriasTrabalhadores::class)->findAll();
3257|        $prevEvts = $this->getEvtsData($company, $esocialTrabalhadorData);
3258|        $myCompany = $em->getRepository(Company::class)->findOneBy(['id' => $company->getId()]);
3259|
3260|        $natJudrid = $myCompany->getLegalNatureCode();
3261|
3262|        $cargos = $em->getRepository(Roles::class)->findBy(['company' => $company]);
3263|
3264|        $departments = $em->getRepository(CompanyArea::class)
3265|            ->findAvailableForCompany($company->getId());
3266|
3267|        $costCenterEntities = $em->getRepository(\App\Entity\CostCenter::class)->findBy([
3268|            'deletedAt' => null,
3269|        ], ['code' => 'ASC']);
3270|        $costCenters = [];
3271|        foreach ($costCenterEntities as $costCenter) {
3272|            $label = trim(($costCenter->getCode() ?? '') . ' - ' . ($costCenter->getTitle() ?? ''));
3273|            $costCenters[] = [
3274|                'id' => $costCenter->getId(),
3275|                'label' => $label !== '-' ? $label : ($costCenter->getTitle() ?? $costCenter->getCode()),
3276|            ];
3277|        }
3278|        $managerOptions = $em->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->findBy(['company' => $company, 'isRemoved' => 0]);
3279|
3280|        // Busca o status dos eventos do eSocial
3281|        $esocialStatus = $this->getEsocialMemberStatus($companyMember['id']);
3282|        $esocialUniqueEventIds = $this->buildEsocialUniqueEventIdsMap($esocialStatus);
3283|
3284|        $admin = $this->security->getUser()->isSuperAdmin() || $this->security->getUser()->isManager();
3285|
3286|        $autRepo = $em->getRepository(GovernanceAuthorization::class);
3287|        $autorizacoes = $autRepo->findByMember($member_res);
3288|        $autorizacoesData = [];
3289|        $autorizacoesVinculadasCatalog = [];
3290|        foreach ($autorizacoes as $autorizacao) {
3291|            $vinculo = null;
3292|            foreach ($autorizacao->getColaboradoresVinculos() as $link) {
3293|                if ($link instanceof GovernanceAuthorizationCollaborator
3294|                    && $link->getCompanyMember()?->getId() === $member_res->getId()) {
3295|                    $vinculo = $link;
3296|                    break;
3297|                }
3298|            }
3299|            if (!$vinculo instanceof GovernanceAuthorizationCollaborator) {
3300|                continue;
3301|            }
3302|            $autorizacoesData[] = $authorizationComplianceViewService->buildMemberProfileCard(
3303|                $autorizacao,
3304|                $vinculo,
3305|                $company
3306|            );
3307|
3308|            $requisitosDetalhesVinculados = $authorizationConditionConfig->buildRequirementDetailsForFrontend(
3309|                $company,
3310|                $autorizacao->getRequisitosList(),
3311|            );
3312|            $autorizacoesVinculadasCatalog[] = [
3313|                'id' => $autorizacao->getId(),
3314|                'titulo' => $autorizacao->getTitulo(),
3315|                'requisitos' => $autorizacao->getRequisitosList(),
3316|                'requisitos_detalhes' => $requisitosDetalhesVinculados,
3317|            ];
3318|        }
3319|
3320|        // Autorizações criadas no módulo SSMA que este membro ainda não possui
3321|        $todasCompanyAuts = $autRepo->findBy(['company' => $company], ['titulo' => 'ASC']);
3322|        $autorizacoesSsma = [];
3323|        foreach ($todasCompanyAuts as $a) {
3324|            if (!$autRepo->memberParticipates($a, $member_res)) {
3325|                $requisitosDetalhes = $authorizationConditionConfig->buildRequirementDetailsForFrontend(
3326|                    $company,
3327|                    $a->getRequisitosList(),
3328|                );
3329|                $autorizacoesSsma[] = [
3330|                    'id' => $a->getId(),
3331|                    'titulo' => $a->getTitulo(),
3332|                    'requisitos' => $a->getRequisitosList(),
3333|                    'requisitos_detalhes' => $requisitosDetalhes,
3334|                ];
3335|            }
3336|        }
3337|
3338|        $viewer = $this->security->getUser();
3339|        $canViewMetaHumanStrategicActionsBlock = $viewer instanceof User
3340|            && $metaHumanProfessionalDossierAccessService->canViewStrategicActionsBlock($viewer, $company, $member_res);
3341|
3342|        $memberBondForm = $serviceProvisionService->buildMemberBondFormData($company, $member_res);
3343|
3344|        return $this->render('company/member_v2_figma.html.twig', [
3345|            'admin' => $admin,
3346|            'member' => $companyMember,
3347|            'isThirdPartyMember' => $isThirdPartyMember,
3348|            'memberBondForm' => $memberBondForm,
3349|            'thirdPartyMissingProviderLink' => $thirdPartyMissingProviderLink,
3350|            'serviceProvision' => $serviceProvision,
3351|            'thirdPartyDocuments' => $thirdPartyDocuments,
3352|            'canViewMetaHumanStrategicActionsBlock' => $canViewMetaHumanStrategicActionsBlock,
3353|            'teams' => $teams,
3354|            'compiled_teams' => $compiled_teams,
3355|            'codCategoria' => $esocialTablesData['codCategoria'],
3356|            'paises' => $esocialTablesData['paises'],
3357|            'tpLogradouro' => $esocialTablesData['tpLogradouro'],
3358|            'tpDependentes' => $esocialTablesData['tpDependentes'],
3359|            'tpAfastamento' => $esocialTablesData['tpAfastamento'],
3360|            'cbo' => $esocialTablesData['cbo'],
3361|            'esocialTrabalhadorData' => $esocialTrabalhadorData,
3362|            'esocialRemuneracaoData' => $esocialRemuneracaoData,
3363|            'esocialRubricasData' => $this->formatEsocialRubricasData($esocialRubricasData),
3364|            'categorias' => $categorias,
3365|            'prevEvts' => $prevEvts,
3366|            'natJurid' => $natJudrid,
3367|            'esocialEstabData' => $esocialEstabData,
3368|            'cargos' => $cargos,
3369|            'costCenters' => $costCenters,
3370|            'managerOptions' => $managerOptions,
3371|            'profileData' => $profileData ?? [],
3372|            'departments' => $departments,
3373|            'esocialStatus' => $esocialStatus,
3374|            'esocialUniqueEventIds' => $esocialUniqueEventIds,
3375|            'autorizacoes' => $autorizacoesData,
3376|            'autorizacoes_ssma' => $autorizacoesSsma,
3377|            'autorizacoes_vinculadas_catalog' => $autorizacoesVinculadasCatalog,
3378|            'aut_member_cnh' => $this->memberProfileCnhService->resolve($member_res),
3379|        ]);
3380|    }
Request #14 deepseek-v4-flash P:56.86K C:1.18K CR:54.14K CW:0 9433ms
Reasoning
Fine — this is the standard my company member manage page. The twig fix is fine. Now let me settle what to report. Given the diff files: 1. Entity type change (int→string): consistent with decimal column. Positive change. But are there any consequences for the sibling entity and the S2399 `pensao_alimenticia` template? Not in scope. Potential real issue to check: In AutomationExecutionService line 15289-15290, before this change setter `?int` would truncate "30.50" to "30". Wait, setter with declared `?int` and weak typing — passing string "30.50" to int param coerces to int 30 (truncation). So the DB value previously stored as 30.00 — the automation change is in the same PR and requires this entity change. So the entity change is a required fix for the decimal automation. Good. But wait, one thing to look out for: previously, setter coercion `(int)` truncated the value — but the number_format in decimalOrNull returns "30.50" and now the setter accepts it, storing 30.50 in the decimal column. Fine. Hmm — is there any concern that the entity still has the sibling EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino which remains int? Inconsistent, but not changed in this PR; we shouldn't comment on unchanged code. 2. The Twig fix is correct. 3. The Ssma test fix aligns with the validator's contract, in-scope? It's a bit out of the offboarding scope but harmless test change. Might mention? Actually careful: The test change may be needed because the behavior changed in a previous PR or the test was failing. Since this is a test-only change to make a test scenario match its declared intent (suspeita de descaracterização → exige caracterizar), that seems legit and harmless. Not worth flagging. However, per review checklist, is there any real issue with the test? It asserts presence of the message but payload lacks `descaracterizado` and `descaracter_comment`. Test is fine. Wait, actually, let me reconsider the entity type change — is it possible that this change is a partial revert of the merge conflict resolution or a mismatch between getter/setter of two entities? Actually let me check the actual DB column type of percAliment and vrAlim in the migration or doc for S2299 desligamento - decimal(10,2)? But do the templates for desligamento send decimal numbers? In `member_guides_esocial_desligamento/pensao_alimenticia.html.twig`, value text input sends percAliment as string. OK. Let me double check whether there might be a genuine bug for existing stored data: On old rows where `percAliment` stores e.g. 30, previously getter returned int 30. Now returns "30" (string without decimals? Actually decimal column returns "30.00"). Front-end inputs display "30.00" now instead of "30" — cosmetic only. Now let me also verify the automation logic added in AutomationExecutionService is out of review scope, but its presence influences whether the entity type change is safe. It's not in the review group, but I read it. It uses decimalOrNull and the string setter — good. Wait, but there's something: `pensAlim` is int-typed column and automation uses intOrNull — fine. But then entity field pensAlim is integer — templates compare `prevEvts.termino.pensAlim == '0'`. Not relevant to our changed fields. Now let me think about the type change and JSON serialization. Since EsocialEvents mapping includes "s2299" = EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento, when events are serialized for eSocial sending (ESocialDataService treatS2299Data uses EsocialS2299EvtDeslig though!). Hmm — wait, which entity is used in the production send path? Import `App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` in ESocialDataService line 23. file_find for "EsocialS2299EvtDeslig" only found EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php and repository. But the import references EsocialS2299EvtDeslig, a separate class? Maybe that class doesn't exist and that import is for a class alias... Actually file_find with query "EsocialS2299EvtDeslig" matched only EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php and repository. So `App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` may not exist as a file - but the import might be unused or in a dead method. Let's search for the class declaration "class EsocialS2299EvtDeslig".
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "EvtDeslig\\b", "use_perl_regexp": true, "file_patterns": ["src/Entity/*.php"]}
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "getEvtsData", "file_patterns": ["src/Controller/CompanyController.php"]}
File: src/Controller/CompanyController.php
Match lines: 2
3257|        $prevEvts = $this->getEvtsData($company, $esocialTrabalhadorData);
6324|    private function getEvtsData(Company $company, $trabalhador)

Request #15 deepseek-v4-flash P:58.13K C:249 CR:57.98K CW:0 2517ms
Reasoning
Interesting: only EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento exists in src/Entity. But `EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino` should exist as well (we referenced it). Let me not get bogged down. getEvtsData at 6324 returns keys 'desligamento' and 'termino' presumably. Let me read it to confirm what type desligamento and termino are; this is relevant to the twig fix correctness and to whether `prevEvts.termino` may ever be the EsocialS2299 entity. Actually, wait — the S2299 entity change and the twig termino guard change are related: maybe the termino tab actually reads an S2299 object? Let's look at getEvtsData.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 6420, "file_path": "src/Controller/CompanyController.php", "start_line": 6324}
File: src/Controller/CompanyController.php (Total lines: 7133)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 6324-6420
6324|    private function getEvtsData(Company $company, $trabalhador)
6325|    {
6326|        $em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
6327|        $events = $em->getRepository(EsocialEvents::class)->findBy(['company' => $company]);
6328|
6329|        $evtS2299 = null;
6330|        $evtS2230 = null;
6331|        $evtS2399 = null;
6332|        $evtS2298 = null;
6333|        $evtS2200 = null;
6334|        $evtS1200 = null;
6335|
6336|        // Verifica se $trabalhador é um array e se tem dados
6337|        if (empty($trabalhador) || !is_array($trabalhador) || !isset($trabalhador[0])) {
6338|            return [
6339|                'desligamento' => $evtS2299,
6340|                'afastamento' => $evtS2230,
6341|                'termino' => $evtS2399,
6342|                'reintegracao' => $evtS2298,
6343|                'admissao' => $evtS2200,
6344|                'remuneracao' => $evtS1200,
6345|            ];
6346|        }
6347|
6348|        // Obtém o ID do trabalhador - $trabalhador[0] é um array com dados formatados
6349|        $trabalhadorId = $trabalhador[0]['id'] ?? null;
6350|        
6351|        if (!$trabalhadorId) {
6352|            return [
6353|                'desligamento' => $evtS2299,
6354|                'afastamento' => $evtS2230,
6355|                'termino' => $evtS2399,
6356|                'reintegracao' => $evtS2298,
6357|                'admissao' => $evtS2200,
6358|                'remuneracao' => $evtS1200,
6359|            ];
6360|        }
6361|
6362|        foreach ($events as $event) {
6363|            if ($event instanceof EsocialS2200EvtAdmissao && $event->getEsocialTrabalhador() !== null) {
6364|                $evt = $event->getEsocialTrabalhador()->getId();
6365|                if ($evt === $trabalhadorId) {
6366|                    $evtS2200 = $event;
6367|                }
6368|            } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS1200EvtRemun && $event->getDadosRemuneracao() !== null && $event->getDadosRemuneracao()->getEsocialTrabalhador() !== null) {
6369|                $evt = $event->getDadosRemuneracao()->getEsocialTrabalhador()->getId();
6370|                if ($evt === $trabalhadorId) {
6371|                    $evtS1200 = $event;
6372|                }
6373|            } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $event->getEsocialTrabalhador() !== null) {
6374|                $evt = $event->getEsocialTrabalhador()->getId();
6375|                if ($evt === $trabalhadorId) {
6376|                    $evtS2299 = $event;
6377|                }
6378|            } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS2230EvtAfastTemp && $event->getEsocialTrabalhador() !== null) {
6379|                $evt = $event->getEsocialTrabalhador()->getId();
6380|                if ($evt === $trabalhadorId) {
6381|                    $evtS2230 = $event;
6382|                }
6383|            } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino && $event->getDadosRemuneracao()->getEsocialTrabalhador() !== null) {
6384|                $evt = $event->getDadosRemuneracao()->getEsocialTrabalhador()->getId();
6385|                if ($evt === $trabalhadorId) {
6386|                    $evtS2399 = $event;
6387|                }
6388|            } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS2298EvtReintegr && $event->getEsocialTrabalhador() !== null) {
6389|                $evt = $event->getEsocialTrabalhador()->getId();
6390|                if ($evt === $trabalhadorId) {
6391|                    $evtS2298 = $event;
6392|                }
6393|            }
6394|        }
6395|
6396|        return [
6397|            'desligamento' => $evtS2299,
6398|            'afastamento' => $evtS2230,
6399|            'termino' => $evtS2399,
6400|            'reintegracao' => $evtS2298,
6401|            'admissao' => $evtS2200,
6402|            'remuneracao' => $evtS1200,
6403|        ];
6404|    }
6405|
6406|    /**
6407|     * Merge inteligente dos dados do eSocial com dados de fallback para exibição
6408|     * Retorna array formatado para o frontend, priorizando dados existentes do eSocial
6409|     */
6410|    private function mergeEsocialTrabalhadorData($esocialData, $profileData): array
6411|    {
6412|        if (empty($esocialData)) {
6413|            // Se não há dados do eSocial, retorna dados de fallback formatados
6414|            return [$this->formatProfileData($profileData)];
6415|        }
6416|
6417|        // Se há dados do eSocial, retorna formatados (prioridade total para dados existentes)
6418|        $formatted = $this->formatEsocialTrabalhadorData($esocialData);
6419|
6420|        if ($profileData instanceof Profile) {
Request #16 deepseek-v4-flash P:59.92K C:691 CR:58.37K CW:0 5761ms
Reasoning
OK so: - `prevEvts.termino` is EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino - `prevEvts.desligamento` is EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento For the termino tab (motivo_desligamento.html.twig in member_guides_esocial_termino) - which holds data for the "Término" (S2399) — the fields are nrProcTrab etc., from S2399 entity. The fix guards on termino. But note: `EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino` also extends EsocialEvents? getEvtsData's events are of type EsocialEvents (from findBy). OK. So the twig change is a legit bug fix consistent with the rest of the template. Good. Now — wait, does EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino have `mtvDesligTsv`? In the template termino/motivo_desligamento they check `prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv`. That entity has percAliment int typed. OK, the review group: three files. I need to give each a pass and decide whether to post comments. Now, let me thoroughly evaluate the entity change for any hidden regression. Change: getPercAliment/setPercAliment/getVrAlim/setVrAlim for EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento changed from ?int to ?string. Given Doctrine decimal columns return string, this aligns. Is there a genuine issue? Possibly none. But wait — how are these values used when exporting to eSocial (S-2299 event submission)? The S2299 submission appears to use `EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` type? No, ESocialDataService references EsocialS2299EvtDeslig with use import — but class doesn't exist? Let me check whether there is an entity in a subfolder. Search for class declarations with "S2299" in entity path returned only EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento. So `EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` import in ESocialDataService is possibly leftover for a legacy class that no longer exists (maybe was replaced by S2299EvtDesligamento extends EsocialEvents). Hmm but if the class doesn't exist, treatS2299Data wouldn't compile... unless class files are autoloaded from somewhere else. Let me search files (maybe EsocialS2299EvtDeslig.php is a different file, e.g., `EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` appears in code search). Search for "EsocialS2299EvtDeslig " (not Desligamento).
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "EsocialS2299EvtDeslig[^a]", "use_perl_regexp": true}
File: src/Service/ESocialDataService.php
Match lines: 8
23|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDeslig;
122|        } elseif ($evento instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDeslig) {
164|        } elseif ($evento instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDeslig) {
1056|    private function treatS2299Data(EsocialS2299EvtDeslig $evento): array
1662|                EsocialS2299EvtDeslig::class,
1786|            //$evento instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDeslig ||
3489|                EsocialS2299EvtDeslig::class,
3493|            EsocialS2299EvtDeslig::class => [

file_find
Show Details
{"query_name": "EsocialS2399"}
src/Entity/EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino.php
src/Repository/EsocialS2399EvtTsvTerminoRepository.php
Request #17 deepseek-v4-flash P:60.84K C:531 CR:60.54K CW:0 4669ms
Reasoning
Interesting — `App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` is referenced but there is no such class file in src/Entity. That means those code paths in ESocialDataService are perhaps dead/unreachable (legacy code referencing a class that no longer exists), or the class may exist under a namespace file with another name? Autoload PSR-4 App\Entity maps to src/Entity/. If class file absent, referencing `EsocialS2299EvtDeslig::class` at runtime is fine (class constant reference is compile-time for ::class, resolved to string without autoload). But `instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` with non-existent class: `$evento instanceof SomeClass` — instanceof with a string of a class that doesn't exist returns false without error, actually instanceof with an undefined class is fine (returns false). And type hint `treatS2299Data(EsocialS2299EvtDeslig $evento)` would fatal if invoked with wrong type, but if never called, fine. This suggests EsocialS2299EvtDeslig was a legacy entity that was replaced/renamed to EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento. So the S2299 submission path probably isn't via treatS2299Data anymore; rather, EsocialEvents class hierarchy likely drives event serialization. EsocialEvents base class probably includes properties + methods to build XML using `eventKey`. The S2299 event export path would read the entity getters for percaliment/vralim — via ESocialDataService in some other methods lines 1320-1330 with other types? Wait line 1330 `$std->percaliment = $evento->getPercAliment();` matched from search; let me check around 1320-1340. Actually earlier we saw matches at 1078-1079 and 1330-1331. 1330 may be in treatS2399Data for EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino (int typed). Let me check 1310-1340.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 1345, "file_path": "src/Service/ESocialDataService.php", "start_line": 1290}
File: src/Service/ESocialDataService.php (Total lines: 3725)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1290-1345
1290|                $std->infocomplementares->remuneracao->dscsalvar = $remuneracao->getDscSalVar();
1291|            }
1292|            
1293|            // Grupo localTrabGeral
1294|            if ($infoComplementares->getLocalTrabGeral()) {
1295|                $localTrab = $infoComplementares->getLocalTrabGeral();
1296|                $std->infocomplementares->localtrabgeral = new \stdClass();
1297|                $std->infocomplementares->localtrabgeral->tpinsc = $localTrab->getTpInsc();
1298|                $std->infocomplementares->localtrabgeral->nrinsc = $localTrab->getNrInsc();
1299|                $std->infocomplementares->localtrabgeral->desccomp = $localTrab->getDescComp();
1300|            }
1301|        }
1302|        
1303|        $configJson = $this->getConfigJson($evento);
1304|        
1305|        return [
1306|            'std' => $std,
1307|            'configJson' => $configJson
1308|        ];
1309|    }
1310|
1311|    private function treatS2399Data(EsocialS2399EvtTSVTermino $evento): array
1312|    {
1313|        $std = new \stdClass();
1314|        $std->modo = $evento->getModo() ?? 'INC';
1315|        
1316|        // Grupo ideEvento
1317|        $std->indretif = $evento->getIndRetif();
1318|        if ($evento->getIndRetif() == 2) {
1319|            $std->nrrecibo = $evento->getNrRecibo();
1320|        }
1321|        
1322|        // Grupo ideTrabSemVinculo
1323|        $std->cpftrab = preg_replace('/[^0-9]/', '', $evento->getCpfTrab());
1324|        $std->matricula = $evento->getMatricula();
1325|        
1326|        // Grupo infoTSVTermino
1327|        $std->dtterm = $evento->getDtTerm() ? $evento->getDtTerm()->format('Y-m-d') : null;
1328|        $std->mtvdesligtsv = $evento->getMtvDesligTSV();
1329|        $std->pensalim = $evento->getPensAlim();
1330|        $std->percaliment = $evento->getPercAliment();
1331|        $std->vralim = $evento->getVrAlim();
1332|        $std->nrproctrab = $evento->getNrProcTrab();
1333|        
1334|        // Grupo mudancaCPF (opcional)
1335|        if ($evento->getMudancaCPF()) {
1336|            $std->mudancacpf = new \stdClass();
1337|            $std->mudancacpf->novocpf = $evento->getMudancaCPF()->getNovoCPF();
1338|        }
1339|        
1340|        // Grupo verbasResc (opcional)
1341|        if ($evento->getVerbasResc()) {
1342|            $verbasResc = $evento->getVerbasResc();
1343|            $std->verbasresc = new \stdClass();
1344|            $std->verbasresc->dmdev = [];
1345|            
Request #18 deepseek-v4-flash P:62.27K C:195 CR:61.31K CW:0 2807ms
Reasoning
OK, this confirms treatS2299Data is legacy for `EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` class which no longer exists. So the S-2299 submit path for EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento must be handled differently. Let me check how EsocialEvents get mapped to a "std" for submission. Actually let's search for how the system transforms EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento into nfephp Evento for sending. Search in ESocialDataService for "EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento".
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento", "file_patterns": ["src/Service/"]}
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 15
40|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
14984|                    if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $event->getStatus() !== 'pendente') {
14986|                    } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
14991|                        if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
15029|            if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
15079|                'message' => $event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable'
15180|    ): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
15197|            ->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
15200|        if (!$event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
15214|    ): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento {
15220|            ->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
15239|        EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $event,
15265|    private function createEsocialS2299DraftEvent(Company $company, EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador): EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
15267|        $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
15281|    private function applyEsocialS2299Payload(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $event, array $payload, bool $onlyEmptyFields = false): void

File: src/Service/FlowableServices/FlowableVariablesService.php
Match lines: 7
15168|     * Template: EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento (S-2299 - Desligamento)
15174|     * @param int $eventId ID do evento (EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento)
15179|        $repository = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class);
18943|                \App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class => ['s2299', 'Desligamento'],
19097|            \App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class => ['s2299', 'Desligamento'],
19326|            \App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class => ['s2299', 'Desligamento'],
19700|        $s2299Repo = $em->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class);

Request #19 deepseek-v4-flash P:63.09K C:1.33K CR:62.34K CW:0 11494ms
Reasoning
OK the S-2299 submission path is unclear but these consumers are all pass-through. I'm confident that the type change to `?string` is actually the Doctrine-correct type and there are no arithmetic consumers. Let me check quickly the base class EsocialEvents for mapping `s2299` handling to see how it converts entity getters into the nfephp std (the actual sender uses TraitS2299 to build arrays where percAliment value must probably be a number). Let me look at how EsocialEvents / EsocialDataService maps an event to std by scanning getters or using generic reflection. Search for "getPercAliment" references already found: only these places. The nfephp trait uses `$this->std->percaliment`. Where is `$this->std->percaliment` set for the new S2299EvtDesligamento path? That is, when the event is EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento and the code submits — does it go through a generic mapping? Possibly via the older entity EsocialS2299EvtDeslig? That means there might be some duplication. This rabbit hole is beyond review scope; the entity type change aligns with Doctrine decimal semantics and with the automation's decimalOrNull returning strings. I'll treat it as correct. Now: Is there an actual issue in this entity change worth reporting? Let me consider the possibility that getters are also used by Twig templates with `prevEvts.desligamento.percAliment` and JS validations, but they're fine. One issue: phpdoc/attribute? The change only touched getters/setters, not docblocks; no properties declared typed. So no. Now, let me check the git diff for the entity file again to ensure only these four methods changed (yes). Let me decide on final feedback: The overall set of 3 files contains changes that are in-scope and mostly fixes. Potential comments: 1. Entity type change — informational, no defect. Could flag low-severity "maintainability" that the sibling entity EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino still declares ?int for the same decimal columns, creating inconsistency and risk of future truncation on reads/sets. But we must only comment on changed code. We can comment on the changed entity lines noting consumers must be aware that outputs are now decimal strings ("30.00") rather than ints — e.g., JSON payloads exported to Flowable variables or to frontend previously received numeric int; now strings with decimals. And conversely, any code still doing `(int)` won't crash. It's a mild risk. Hmm. Actually, let me think about a real consequence: The Flowable variables (used by templates/formatters) for `getPercAliment()` returning "30.00" (string) vs int 30. In flow variables when generating eventData (e.g., to pre-fill BPM tasks, decision system, etc.), a string decimal may render as "30.00", whereas previously "30". Not a blocker. Better check: are there Twig/JS code paths that test `vrAlim == 0`? no. Wait, actually there is a specific real risk: In `AutomationExecutionService::applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue`, the closure for percAliment passes `$this->decimalOrNull(...)` returning e.g. "30.00". But note: previously with `?int` setter and now `?string`, this same PR introduced setter callers. The change to the entity (in this diff) matches automation changes (in other file). Fine. Potential real bug might be in decimalOrNull handling of "30.00" for vrAlim with R$ values? Out of scope (AutomationExecutionService not in review files). So the entity change appears to be a deliberate, well-scoped fix. No comment needed, or a low-severity informational comment about the sibling entity not following? Since sibling isn't part of the diff, skip. Hmm, but wait — there might be a genuine issue with the type declaration change: PHP return type declarations in weak mode coerce. With getter returning `?string` while the property value is actually... but no typed property. Fine. Actually, let me think about data integrity: With the previous `?int` setter, any caller passing decimal values truncated them. Existing stored rows in DB might already hold integer values (like 30) because previously setter coerced. But they might also hold decimals like "30.50" if written via other code that bypassed setter or directly SQL. No concern. 2. Twig change — correct fix. no comment. 3. Ssma test — OK. Given the instructions "Avoid commenting on correct code", and each rule set says focus on issues in new code... It's plausible there's no critical finding in these three files. However, I should carefully re-examine whether something IS wrong. Let me re-check the entity change once more in relation to how those fields render for editing: `templates/company/member_guides_esocial_desligamento/pensao_alimenticia.html.twig` value uses prevEvts.desligamento.percAliment; when persisting, the controller passes data to repository saveEventS2299, e.g., $data['percAliment'] could be a string like "30,00"? Depending on input formatting, if a user typed 30.5, DB stores "30.50". Now display would show "30.50". Previously getter returned 30. So this actually fixes data precision. Wait — but there may be a deeper issue: the S2299 `desligamento` entity's DB column: we should confirm the actual column type in the DB (maybe it's integer!) If the migration never added the column, or the column is integer. Let me look at migration files to verify column type: search migrations for perc_aliment.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["migrations/"], "search_text": "perc_aliment|percAliment"}
No matches found
Request #20 deepseek-v4-flash P:64.43K C:93 CR:64.38K CW:0 1993ms
Reasoning
No migrations found referencing perc_aliment. Let me check actual DB schema via `schema` files or entity-based migration for S2299 table creation. Search for "esocial_s2299" or the table name.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "esocial_s2299"}
File: config/automations/offboarding.yaml
Match lines: 2
182|    - id: "create_esocial_s2299_draft"
183|      type: "create_esocial_s2299_draft"

File: docs/Flowable/Tasks/formatters/esocial_s2299_campos_disponiveis.md
Match lines: 2
202|| `processType` | string | global | Tipo do processo: "esocial_s2299" |
420|// - processType: "esocial_s2299"

File: docs/LEVANTAMENTO_TEMPORAL_EMPLOYMENT_KERNEL_V03.md
Match lines: 5
44|| **esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento** | `dt_deslig`, `dt_av_prv`, `dt_proj_fim_api`, `dt_nascto`, `dt_fim_remun` | Evento pontual / fim remuneração | Data desligamento; data aviso prévio; fim última remuneração | Fonte histórica por evento; **não** lida pelo EmploymentLoader atual. |
71|| **esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento.dt_deslig** | Explícita | Alta | Um registro por evento de desligamento; histórico preservado. Não usado pelo SoR v0.1. |
72|| **esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento.dt_fim_remun** | Explícita | Alta (para fim de obrigações remuneratórias) | Fim da última remuneração. Não usado pelo EmploymentLoader. |
108|| **esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento** | Alta (por evento) | Não integrada ao EmploymentLoader; histórico existe mas não é usado para Employment. |
135|- **Fonte mais confiável de endDate do Employment:** Para **histórico**, **esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento.dt_deslig** (e dt_fim_remun). Para **valor único atual** lido pelo sistema: **esocial_dados_trabalhador.DesligEAfast.dtDeslig**, com risco de sobrescrita e ausência de histórico.

File: docs/database-changes/2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template.md
Match lines: 5
15|- Inclui a automacao `create_esocial_s2299_draft` na etapa final.
28|1. Publicar o codigo com a action `create_esocial_s2299_draft` disponivel em `config/automations/offboarding.yaml`.
51|  AND fa.action_type = 'create_esocial_s2299_draft';
58|O `DOWN` nao remove fisicamente os templates marcados com `settings.seed_migration = 20260901171000_offboarding_esocial_s2299_flow_template`. Ele desativa o template, remove o marcador `seed_migration` e grava `seed_migration_rolled_back`, preservando etapas, atividades, automacoes e vinculos do template para nao apagar instancias/processos em andamento por cascata.
66|- O fluxo depende da action `create_esocial_s2299_draft` estar disponivel no codigo antes da migration ser usada operacionalmente.

File: migration_archive_20260508/Version20250401194424.php
Match lines: 2
238|        $this->addSql('CREATE TABLE esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento (id INT NOT NULL, esocial_dados_trabalhador_id INT NOT NULL, dados_remuneracao_id INT NOT NULL, mtv_deslig VARCHAR(2) CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 DEFAULT NULL COLLATE `utf8mb4_unicode_ci`, dt_deslig DATE DEFAULT NULL, dt_av_prv DATE DEFAULT NULL, ind_pagto_api VARCHAR(1) CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 DEFAULT NULL COLLATE `utf8mb4_unicode_ci`, dt_proj_fim_api DATE DEFAULT NULL, pens_alim INT DEFAULT NULL, perc_aliment NUMERIC(10, 2) DEFAULT NULL, vr_alim NUMERIC(10, 2) DEFAULT NULL, nr_proc_trab VARCHAR(20) CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 DEFAULT NULL COLLATE `utf8mb4_unicode_ci`, ind_pdv VARCHAR(1) CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 DEFAULT NULL COLLATE `utf8mb4_unicode_ci`, cpf_substituto VARCHAR(11) CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 DEFAULT NULL COLLATE `utf8mb4_unicode_ci`, dt_nascto DATE DEFAULT NULL, novo_cpf VARCHAR(11) CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 DEFAULT NULL COLLATE `utf8mb4_unicode_ci`, ind_remun INT DEFAULT NULL, dt_fim_remun DATE DEFAULT NULL, ins_consig VARCHAR(5) CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 DEFAULT NULL COLLATE `utf8mb4_unicode_ci`, nr_contr VARCHAR(40) CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 DEFAULT NULL COLLATE `utf8mb4_unicode_ci`, INDEX IDX_D440E7D5D4BAED88 (esocial_dados_trabalhador_id), INDEX IDX_D440E7D54CA5B57C (dados_remuneracao_id), PRIMARY KEY(id)) DEFAULT CHARACTER SET utf8mb4 COLLATE `utf8mb4_unicode_ci` ENGINE = InnoDB COMMENT = \'\' ');
758|        $this->addSql('DROP TABLE esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento');

File: migrations/Version20260723151219.php
Match lines: 2
37|        if ($this->tablesExist(['esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento', 'esocial_dados_trabalhador'])) {
40|                 FROM esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento desligamento

File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
Match lines: 7
12|    private const SEED_KEY = '20260901171000_offboarding_esocial_s2299_flow_template';
187|            'preset' => 'offboarding_esocial_s2299',
188|            'modules' => ['offboarding' => true, 'esocial_s2299' => true],
294|                        'actionType' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
297|                            '_default_automation_id' => 'offboarding_esocial_s2299_draft_on_final_stage_enter',
301|                            'type' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
304|                                '_default_automation_id' => 'offboarding_esocial_s2299_draft_on_final_stage_enter',

File: src/Controller/Api/PeopleAnalytics/AttractionRetentionController.php
Match lines: 1
516|            LEFT JOIN esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento desl ON desl.esocial_dados_trabalhador_id = edt.id

File: src/Controller/Api/PeopleAnalytics/CostAnalysisController.php
Match lines: 1
980|            FROM esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento desl

File: src/Controller/CompanyMemberController.php
Match lines: 1
874|            'esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento',

File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 2
506|            'create_esocial_s2299_draft' => $this->executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft($config, $member, $context),
15074|                'esocial_s2299_review_url' => $reviewUrl,

File: src/Service/FlowableServices/FlowableVariablesService.php
Match lines: 2
15185|                $this->formatter->formatString('processType', 'esocial_s2299', 'global'),
15192|            $this->formatter->formatString('processType', 'esocial_s2299', 'global'),

File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/AtracaoRetencaoService.php
Match lines: 21
32| * - esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento: Eventos de desligamento
391|     * - COUNT(DISTINCT esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento.id)
395|     * - esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento: Eventos de desligamento eSocial (dt_deslig, mtv_deslig)
426|            FROM esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento evt
648|     * - esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento: Eventos de desligamento (LEFT JOIN)
686|            LEFT JOIN esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento deslig ON deslig.esocial_dados_trabalhador_id = edt.id
756|     * - esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento: Eventos de desligamento (dt_deslig)
789|            FROM esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento deslig
844|     * - Série 2 (Desligamentos): COUNT(DISTINCT esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento.id) agrupado por mês
855|     * - esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento: Eventos de desligamento
952|            FROM esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento evt
1075|     * - esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento: Eventos de desligamento
1116|            LEFT JOIN esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento evt_desl ON evt_desl.esocial_dados_trabalhador_id = edt.id 
1378|     * - esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento: Eventos de desligamento (dt_deslig, mtv_deslig)
1416|            FROM esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento evt
1499|     * - esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento: Eventos de desligamento (dt_deslig)
1547|            FROM esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento evt
1618|     * - esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento: dt_deslig (identificar desligados)
1670|                LEFT JOIN esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento desl ON desl.esocial_dados_trabalhador_id = edt.id
2181|     * - esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento: Desligamentos no período
2236|            LEFT JOIN esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento desl ON desl.esocial_dados_trabalhador_id = edt.id

File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/DiversidadeInclusaoService.php
Match lines: 7
1313|            FROM esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento ed
1438|            FROM esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento ed
1558|        $des = $this->runGroupBaseQuery($sqlBuild('esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento', 'ed', 'ed.dt_deslig'), $params);
1636|            FROM esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento ed
1844|            // Simula turnover (em produção, buscar de esocial_s2299)
2279|            FROM esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento ed
2288|            FROM esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento ed

File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/DynamicFilterService.php
Match lines: 3
663|     * Fonte: esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento.mtv_deslig (tabela de eventos de desligamento)
683|            INNER JOIN esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento ed ON ed.esocial_dados_trabalhador_id = edt.id
1558|            INNER JOIN esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento ed ON ed.esocial_dados_trabalhador_id = edt.id

File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/EngagementService.php
Match lines: 4
98| * - esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento: eventos de desligamento (turnover)
2755|     *     - Desligamentos: esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento no período
2806|     * - esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento (eventos de desligamento)
2849|            LEFT JOIN esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento desl ON etrab.id = desl.esocial_dados_trabalhador_id

File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/OrganizationalHealthService.php
Match lines: 1
3076|            LEFT JOIN esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento e2299 

File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/WelfareAbsenceService.php
Match lines: 3
2351|     * - Usa esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento (desligamentos formais)
2362|     * - esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento (dt_deslig)
2428|                LEFT JOIN esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento esd 

File: templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig
Match lines: 1
532|        'create_esocial_s2299_draft': 'Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299)',

File: templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig
Match lines: 1
4078|        'create_esocial_s2299_draft':   'criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299)',

Request #21 deepseek-v4-flash P:67.65K C:471 CR:64.51K CW:0 4065ms
Reasoning
Confirmed: The DB column for `perc_aliment` and `vr_alim` in table `esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento` is NUMERIC(10,2). So `?string` getters/setters align with Doctrine's decimal semantics. This is the correct fix; previously `?int` was a bug (truncation). So in the entity file, the change is correct and necessary for the automation to persist decimals (30.50) rather than truncating to 30. Let me now think about a subtle real bug with this change given the automation, idempotency, etc. — the automation is in the other file. But maybe there's a cross-file mismatch: the automation passes decimal values via decimalOrNull which strips "R$", "%" and spaces, and then number_format 2 decimals → "30.50". Now setter accepts. Also `$onlyEmptyFields` read getter string now. Now check other consumers that were previously given ints but may now receive string decimals and might do something type-sensitive: - `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::getFlowableDataForTemplate` → used by FlowableVariablesService lines 15185-15192 (formatEventData for S2299). Let me look at that method to see how percaliment/vralim are formatted. Actually, earlier matches at lines 15208 and 15284, which use `$eventData['percAliment'] ?? 0.0` and formatDouble. $eventData comes from `getFlowableDataForTemplate` (includes percAliment now string). formatDouble probably handles string numeric. So fine. Let me read FlowableVariablesService lines 15180-15200 and 15280-15290 quickly to check formatter behaviors.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 15210, "file_path": "src/Service/FlowableServices/FlowableVariablesService.php", "start_line": 15160}
File: src/Service/FlowableServices/FlowableVariablesService.php (Total lines: 20241)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 15160-15210
15160|            // Dados completos do evento (para referência)
15161|            $this->formatter->formatJson('eventData', $eventData, 'global'),
15162|        ];
15163|
15164|        return $variables;
15165|    }
15166|
15167|    /**
15168|     * Template: EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento (S-2299 - Desligamento)
15169|     * 
15170|     * Retorna variáveis formatadas com todos os dados do evento S-2299.
15171|     * Este template disponibiliza todas as informações de desligamento do trabalhador
15172|     * no eSocial para uso em processos Flowable.
15173|     * 
15174|     * @param int $eventId ID do evento (EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento)
15175|     * @return array Variáveis formatadas para o Flowable
15176|     */
15177|    public function getEsocialS2299Variables(int $eventId): array
15178|    {
15179|        $repository = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class);
15180|        $eventData = $repository->getFlowableDataForTemplate($eventId);
15181|
15182|        if (!$eventData) {
15183|            // Retornar variáveis com placeholders quando evento não encontrado
15184|            return [
15185|                $this->formatter->formatString('processType', 'esocial_s2299', 'global'),
15186|                $this->formatter->formatLong('eventId', $eventId, 'global'),
15187|                $this->formatter->formatString('error', 'Evento não encontrado', 'global'),
15188|            ];
15189|        }
15190|
15191|        $variables = [
15192|            $this->formatter->formatString('processType', 'esocial_s2299', 'global'),
15193|            $this->formatter->formatLong('eventId', $eventId, 'global'),
15194|            $this->formatter->formatLong('companyId', $eventData['company']['id'] ?? 0, 'global'),
15195|            $this->formatter->formatString('companyName', $eventData['company']['name'] ?? '{{companyName}}', 'global'),
15196|            $this->formatter->formatString('companyCode', $eventData['company']['code'] ?? '{{companyCode}}', 'global'),
15197|            $this->formatter->formatString('companyCnpj', $eventData['company']['cnpj'] ?? '{{companyCnpj}}', 'global'),
15198|            $this->formatter->formatString('eventType', 'S-2299', 'global'),
15199|            $this->formatter->formatString('eventStatus', $eventData['status'] ?? '{{eventStatus}}', 'global'),
15200|            
15201|            // Dados específicos do evento S-2299 - Desligamento
15202|            $this->formatter->formatString('mtvDeslig', $eventData['mtvDeslig'] ?? '{{mtvDeslig}}', 'global'),
15203|            $this->formatter->formatDate('dtDeslig', $eventData['dtDeslig'], 'yyyy-MM-dd', 'global'),
15204|            $this->formatter->formatDate('dtAvPrv', $eventData['dtAvPrv'], 'yyyy-MM-dd', 'global'),
15205|            $this->formatter->formatString('indPagtoApi', $eventData['indPagtoApi'] ?? '{{indPagtoApi}}', 'global'),
15206|            $this->formatter->formatDate('dtProjFimApi', $eventData['dtProjFimApi'], 'yyyy-MM-dd', 'global'),
15207|            $this->formatter->formatInteger('pensAlim', $eventData['pensAlim'] ?? 0, 'global'),
15208|            $this->formatter->formatDouble('percAliment', $eventData['percAliment'] ?? 0.0, 'global'),
15209|            $this->formatter->formatDouble('vrAlim', $eventData['vrAlim'] ?? 0.0, 'global'),
15210|            $this->formatter->formatString('nrProcTrab', $eventData['nrProcTrab'] ?? '{{nrProcTrab}}', 'global'),
Request #22 deepseek-v4-flash P:69.19K C:8.32K CR:68.1K CW:0 62208ms
Reasoning
These use formatDouble which will accept numeric strings. Fine. Now — final decision about what to report. Let me consider each file and whether there's a genuine defect introduced: **File 1: EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php** — Type change int→string on decimal-backed fields: correct fix, consistent with DB NUMERIC(10,2) and with the new automation (`decimalOrNull` returns "30.00" string). No defect to report. There is, however, the fact that the same getters are used by the old `EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` (dead) and `EsocialS2399` remains int typed... not in scope. One thing to double check: are there any callers doing strict numeric comparison on the getter result that would now break? Search for usage of getVrAlim/getPercAliment in comparisons e.g., `=== 30`. We searched earlier; consumers are repository/serialization and template values. No strict arithmetic found. **File 2: twig** — Guard fix is correct and matches the rest of the file. No issue. Wait, let me double-check one thing: the old condition `prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab`. The new is `prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab`. Is the actual entity (EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino) exposing `nrProcTrab`? The S2399 entity earlier search: getNrProcTrab exists (used in template and repo). Yes. **File 3: SsmaEventValidatorTest** — Test now marks the suspect flag and expects the "caracterizado" message. Behavior match for current validator. It's test-only, in a different product (Ssma vs Offboarding) — mild scope concern but harmless; probably required to keep the suite green due to prior validator behavior change. Not worth flagging as bug; possibly note low severity: the test doesn't assert the negative case anymore? The previous test name suggested it expected caracterizar whenever aprofundamento_only (without suspect). Now it's updated to reflect suspect semantics; the negative case is covered by `testToastAprofundamentoIncompleto...` (assertFalse caracterizar) — actually that test lacks descaracter_suspect but also lacks aprofundamento_only? Let's see: testToastAprofundamentoIncompletoUsaMensagensHumanasDoPrint has aprofundamento_complete but not aprofundamento_only. So the "sem suspeita não exige caracterizar" scenario with aprofundamento_only isn't covered now. Not a blocker. Hmm, wait — let me re-examine: does testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoMedicoComSuspeitaExigeCaracterizar actually pass? It has aprofundamento_only => true and descaracter_suspect '1'. hasSuspect true. descVal = '' since descaracterizado not present → error message contains 'caracterizado como acidente'. Test asserts such error exists. Yes passes. Now consider whether there might be an actual issue in the automation idempotency that interacts with the entity — not in scope. Let me look at git diff for the changed entity lines more closely to see if there was an inconsistency like getter `?string` but property annotation in docblock `?int`? The property docblocks only describe column type (decimal) without php type. Fine. Let me examine whether there are any other files that might rely on the return of these getters being integer — like the two formatters in FlowableVariablesService we didn't check (lines 15284 around the other getEsocialS2399Variables). Both fine. Also check `EsocialEvents` class mapping for "s2299" for how the S2299 is serialized to the nfephp Event (to check if percAliment now as string would break the JSON schema validation). But given that `EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` legacy class used by treatS2299Data and TraitS2299 no longer exists, likely the S-2299 actual send is through some generic mechanism. Let me search for how EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento is transformed into an event payload for sending. Search within EsocialEvents base and elsewhere for percaliment assignments relative to EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento, or generic mapping using getters. Actually the search for "getPercAliment()" found all callers. The only places that feed the nfephp TraitS2299 std->percaliment are ESocialDataService treatS2299Data (legacy entity) and treatS2399Data. So for S2299EvtDesligamento, submission likely doesn't go through nfephp TraitS2299? Or maybe there's an older path that maps a different set. Not our concern for the diff. Therefore — no real defects to report in the three review files? Hmm, but normally a review should flag something meaningful. Let me not force issues. Wait, reconsider the twig change once more. The bug being fixed: "Corrigido erro ao abrir a aba de desligamento quando prevEvts.termino ainda não existe." Actually the corrected code is in the termino/motivo template (member_guides_esocial_termino). Note there's also a `member_guides_esocial/desligamento.html.twig` and `member_guides_esocial_desligamento/motivo_desligamento.html.twig` etc. The specific file path in the diff is `templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig`. Which page uses these "termino" templates? Probably the tab "Término" that renders these templates only when member is "sem vínculo" or the S-2399 tab. So when the termino doesn't exist yet and the user opens the tab, previously... old code `prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` — since prevEvts.termino is null, and Twig default mode isn't strict, `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` returns null. No fatal... unless the tab is only rendered when there's no termino? The actual reported bug could be about an actual error. Twig attribute access on null returns null in non-strict mode. However if strict_variables is enabled in any environment (e.g., dev), it throws. Or the error was of a different nature: The scenario "when prevEvts.termino ainda não existe" — if a *desligamento* (S-2299) event exists but termino doesn't (i.e., employee is regular CLT, opening "Término de TSV" tab), the old check reads `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` with null termino and Twig could return null (or error in strict env). The fix is correct. So all three changes look correct. Let me now be thorough and check if `prevEvts` may be missing entirely in some rendering contexts (e.g., if this partial template is rendered in a different controller without prevEvts variable). If `prevEvts` is undefined, `prevEvts.termino` would raise an error in strict mode; but this was pre-existing for the other fields, and the fix keeps referencing prevEvts. Not a new issue. Since the instructions strongly emphasize finding genuine issues, I should be careful: perhaps the intended "bug" in this review exercise is the entity type change from int→string. Think: Why would they change int → string? Because the automation uses decimalOrNull that returns strings like "30.00". But before the entity changed, the automation code calling `setPercAliment("30.00")` would coerce to int 30 (weak mode) — storing 30 not 30.00. However, wait, before this PR, was there any path that stored decimal values like 30.5 into these fields? If a user filled 30.5 in UI, the controller passed "30.5" → `?int` setter coerced to 30, truncating .5. The real fix is now string. OK. Is there any regression risk in changing the getters? Yes: any existing code reading `getPercAliment()` and expecting `int` will now get a string — but PHP arithmetic/comparison numeric strings behave numerically, so minimal risk. Consumers that `json_encode` the value (e.g., flow variable eventData) will now produce "30.00" instead of 30. If consumers parse with parseInt, fine. If consumers compare as int, they cast. Not severe. Hmm, wait — here's something to consider: applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue with `$onlyEmptyFields = false` always writes; fine. Let me re-examine the decision about whether to report a "medium/low" note about the type change contract affecting external consumers (Flowable variables and JSON payloads) to ensure those consumers parse decimals, since these fields previously surfaced as ints. This is more of an FYI and could be considered a "non-blocking maintainability/contract" comment. Actually, being careful about rules "Focus on issues in newly added code", and "Avoid commenting on correct code". The change is arguably correct. A comment might add noise. Hmm — But consider the `EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino` entity, which has the same fields `percAliment` and `vrAlim` also as NUMERIC? Let's check its column definitions. If its columns are also decimal (10,2), then there's an inconsistency where getters in S2399 remain int. But S2399 entity is not part of the PR. Let me now double-check what the S2399 columns look like, to assess whether "int" was the wrong type also there, and whether the S2299 change to string while S2399 still int is fine (unrelated unchanged). OK. Time to decide the final review output. Given the code seems correct, I might still report: 1. For entity: no comment (correct fix). Actually, let me reconsider whether there is a genuine bug I've missed: In `AutomationExecutionService`, `applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue` reads `$currentValue = $getter();` and if `$onlyEmptyFields` and currentValue is null/'' skip. But that's out of scope. But there's a subtle cross-file mismatch with the *idempotency* requirement and the entity: Nope. Hold on, maybe I should look at where the form values for percAliment come from in `member_guides_esocial_termino/pensao_alimenticia.html.twig` and `member_guides_esocial_desligamento/pensao_alimenticia.html.twig`, then how they're saved via `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::saveEventS2299`, and whether there's some *other* field receiving the same type of data... nothing else. Wait, actually, let me look at how the termino data is saved (EsocialS2399EvtTsvTerminoRepository::saveEvent... maybe passes $data['percentualPensao'] to setPercAliment of type int). There may be an int parsing that converts "30.50" to 30? But those getters are untouched by this PR. Not in scope. Let me read the diff for the three files one more time to ensure I've captured everything. Done. Now, think again about the test file. Commit message: "fix(tests): add suspect characterization field". The user rules: "Mudança de comportamento precisa de teste automatizado cobrindo o fluxo real, não apenas um helper isolado." The test is unit; fine. No bug. I think we should look at one more thing for the twig: The `value` renders `{{ prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab }}` — if termino null, no. If termino non-null and nrProcTrab null, fine. Escaping auto applied. Potential out-of-scope: The twig change is within eSocial termino; PR's scope includes "aba de desligamento sem erro quando prevEvts.termino não existe" — In the OCR background, item 6: "Abrir a aba de desligamento/eSocial do membro e confirmar que não ocorre erro de acesso a nrProcTrab quando não houver evento anterior." So it's exactly in scope. Entity type change — the background says commit e0765bd200: "bugfix(esocial): Alterar os tipos de dados dos campos de pensão para 'string' e aprimorar a lógica de notificação no processo de desligamento S-2299". So this is intended, part of scope. Given all three files are fine, should I just conclude with task_done? The user instructions say if no obvious code issues found call task_done. But is there any real code issue? Let me try a more careful hunt on the entity for PHP type coercion pitfalls related to the change. Actually! Wait. Consider weak-mode return coercion. In PHP, if getter declares `: ?string` but the property contains an int (e.g., newly created entity, set via setPercAliment(null), value null), returning null fine. If a caller calls `setPercAliment(30)` (int) in weak mode, param coerces int 30 → "30" string. Fine. So no TypeError. Now, what about code that does `$event->setPercAliment($data['percAliment'])` where $data comes from `request->request->all()` as array of strings: fine. But consider `saveEventS2299` with `$data['percAliment']` numeric from JSON body (e.g., float 30.5). Weak coercion to string "30.5". DB decimal stores 30.50. good. Previously in AutomationExecutionService the call was in the same commit set (other file). Combined behavior fine. One additional possible regression: `applyEsocialS2299PayloadValue`'s `$onlyEmptyFields` reading now gets "30.00" string — not empty → skip → correct. OK, now think about JSON produced to front end: templates under `member_guides_esocial_desligamento` use `prevEvts.desligamento.percAliment` directly; Twig prints it. Previously int 30 → "30"; now "30.00" → displays 30.00 in the input `value`. Slightly different but more precise. The user may then save and send "30.00"; DB decimal fine. So the change appears safe and beneficial. Should I report anything? There's a mild maintainability concern: the type declaration now contradicts sibling entity EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino (same decimal columns, still int). If this is truly a bug fix for decimals, the S2399 entity and its repository (`EsocialS2399EvtTsvTerminoRepository`) have the same truncation bug, and the S2399 templates (member_guides_esocial_termino/pensao_alimenticia) share the same field semantics. But since S2399 is out of the diff, per "Strict Focus Rules", comments must target code within review_files — I can attach a note to the S2299 entity lines mentioning inconsistency with the S2399 counterpart as an FYI. But is that a "defect likely real in changed code"? Not exactly. Let me now double check any risk that Doctrine decimal hydration to the *typed getter* previously did NOT coerce (i.e., was fine) and now... Both fine. OK, well, actually let me reconsider the possibility that `getPercAliment(): ?string` combined with the change means code elsewhere could now break at the type level. Find any place calling e.g. `$this->decimalOrNull($event->getPercAliment())`? Not found. Alright. Let me also review the SsmaEventValidatorTest negative case: Since this is a unit test for a validator whose logic is pre-existing, the test change is a correction to align with the current behavior; but is there a missing test scenario (descaracter_suspect='1' and descaracterizado set to valid value '0'/'1' should NOT require comment; and comment required)? Not our concern. Actually, wait — let me reconsider: is it possible the original test was *previously passing* before this change and this PR's addition of `descaracter_suspect => '1'` is because the validator previously required caracterização whenever `aprofundamento_only` and had_injury and injury fields were present? Let me verify: In the validator, the caracterizar block at lines 718-730 is inside a `if (!empty($data['aprofundamento_only']))`. Wait, is `$data` here the details or the payload? Look at line 718: `if (!empty($data['aprofundamento_only']))` where `$data` seems to be the $d (details)? Actually the validator signature: `validate($payload)` which splits into details? The code at 719 uses `$d['descaracter_suspect']`. `$d` likely is the details array. And `$data['aprofundamento_only']` — where data is the full payload. But within a private validator method `validateAcidentePessoal(array $d)` presumably receives the full $payload? Wait line 667+ references `$d['work_leave']` and `$d['injury_classification']`. In the test payloads, those live inside `details`. Hmm — maybe validator flattens: validate() copies details into top-level payload and passes as `$d`. Not important. The key question is whether this caracterização-required logic was introduced in an earlier PR; given this test-only change (commit 747b40fb40) in this PR branch, the test was probably red after some other change and they adjusted it. That means the *validator* behavior requiring suspect came from another branch merged (maybe the "2+ commits omitidos" include Ssma work). Either way, aligning test to the contract is appropriate. So my overall review conclusion: the three files present no critical bug. I could give maybe zero comments or very minor. Hmm, but hold on. Let me look more carefully at whether the twig change may actually introduce a behavior regression: Old code: `value="{% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab %}...` For the "Término de TSV" (S2399) tab, what should fill the nrProcTrab field? It should be the termino's nrProcTrab. The new code does that. Correct. But maybe this specific template `motivo_desligamento.html.twig` in the termino folder is for S-2299 (desligamento de trabalhador sem vínculo)?? Wait, the field `mtvDesligTsv` is a TSV (trabalhador sem vínculo) field, mtv_deslig_tsv, so it belongs to S2399. And `nrProcTrab` also exists in S2399. So correct. OK, so there's nothing to report as a real defect. But let me not be too hasty: maybe there's something wrong in the entity type change because the getters feed the *S2299* template pensão alimentícia where the form expects percentual with possible comma and might round-trip incorrectly. Actually, wait. I realize I should also consider that when this entity change sets `?string`, the AutomationExecutionService's `decimalOrNull` output "30.00" - ok. Fine, I'll post a couple of low-severity informational/attention comments? Or perhaps none and call task_done. But wait, let me reconsider the scope/consistency rule from the user instructions, which says the most important review priority is out-of-scope change or side effect lost in refactor or god object. Given the PR is about the offboarding eSocial S-2299 automation, is there any out-of-scope change here? The Ssma test change is arguably out of scope (product SSMA unrelated to offboarding). But the commit title says fix(tests): add suspect characterization field, so it is deliberate. Would it be "de passagem"? It might be a dependency to keep the branch CI green given the merge of new_production. Since it's minor and test-only, maybe mention as a non-blocking note: it's unrelated to offboarding; if it was needed to fix a pre-existing failing test, that's fine, but if unrelated, consider moving to a separate PR. Low priority. Hmm, but given the instructions "Favor precision over recall: report only defects likely real" and "style-only suggestions non-blocking" - and "out-of-scope change is blocking per user rules". The Ssma test change is not a business-rule change; it's a test fix. Scope concern only. I think we can skip. Let me examine the twig file size/character to consider the "god template" rule: the file is 124 lines with a small inline <script>. Not god template. The change is one line. Now let me reconsider whether there could be a Twig strict-variable concern for `prevEvts.termino` where the whole template may be rendered with prevEvts.termino undefined keys. The controller always returns those keys. Fine. Actually, wait. Let me reconsider: In Twig, `prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` — reading `.nrProcTrab` on a null `termino` — with default non-strict Twig, this returns null (no exception). So why was there an "erro ao abrir a aba"? Perhaps strict_variables is enabled globally in the project's Twig config. Let me check twig config quickly. Not necessary; but this matters for whether the old code truly errored vs just left blank. If Twig is strict, accessing null attribute throws. But is `prevEvts.termino` null? If so, other places like `{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '01' %}` guard first; but the old line accessed `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` without null-check (only checked desligamento). In strict mode this throws "Impossible to access an attribute ('nrProcTrab') on a null variable" whenever prevEvts.desligamento is truthy but termino is null? Wait old code's condition: `prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab`. Twig evaluates left-to-right with short-circuit: if prevEvts.desligamento is falsy (null), it short-circuits and doesn't access termino. If desligamento is truthy but termino null, it accesses termino.nrProcTrab → null in non-strict. So the error scenario is: a member has a desligamento (S2299) event but no termino (S2399) event, and the termino tab template is rendered (maybe both desligamento + termino tabs shown for TSV workers?). With strict mode, error. So the fix is warranted. Now, let me check whether Twig strict_variables is configured true, to be confident the fix addresses a real crash (helps calibrate severity but not needed). Let me skip. Time to finalize. Let me determine if any comment is warranted. Given all three changes seem to be correct, minimal, and in-scope, the honest output: no blocking issues. However, per instructions "If the current code review task is complete, call task_done." We can simply summarize and call task_done. But I want to be extra careful about the entity type change, since it's a public API contract change with callers that may do integer comparisons (strict). Let me search for usages that compare these values to integers with `===` or use `in_array(..., true)`. Search templates for `percAliment`/`vrAlim` with == comparisons: the docs mention numeric comparisons. Let's search JS for percAliment maybe. Let's quickly search 'percAliment' in twig/js with '==' or '==='. Given time constraints, since callers mostly serialize values, the type change is safe. Wait — there's one more consumer I haven't checked: EsocialEvents or somewhere in the S2299 XML/JSON generation (the eventual send of event). If the value reaches the nfephp trait `!empty($this->std->percaliment) ? $this->std->percaliment : null` then the JSON scheme (evtDeslig.schema) expects `percaliment` to be a number. If now value is string "30.50", would JSON schema validation fail (type string vs number)? But does the S2299 send actually flow through TraitS2299 with the std derived from EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento? In ESocialDataService treatS2299Data we saw it typed to the legacy `EsocialS2299EvtDeslig` entity class (nonexistent), so this path may be dead/legacy — that is, the actual S-2299 send for the new entity is not present or not yet implemented (this feature just creates a draft for review). So no send path to break. Actually, since the automation saves a draft ("rascunho") that is later submitted manually through the existing S2299 UI (which uses EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento and repository saveEventS2299 + subsequent sending elsewhere), the send mechanism for EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento presumably exists in the "transmissor" service. I couldn't find it quickly; not critical. One more check for actual numeric formatting for the nfephp XSD value like percent "30.50". Fine. Conclusion: no genuine blocking issues across the three files. I'll produce a concise summary comment listing each file review outcome and call task_done. Perhaps I might include one low-severity maintainability note? Hmm. Given instructions to be precise and only report likely-real defects, and the code seems correct, I'll refrain from inventing issues. Actually, wait. Let me reconsider the Ssma test change once more for correctness — it added `'descaracter_suspect' => '1',` but the assertion says caracterizar must be required. But the payload doesn't include `descaracterizado` nor `descaracter_comment`. So the validator error should include "Informe se o evento é caracterizado como acidente (Sim/Não)." Test asserts substring 'caracterizado como acidente'. That matches. Good. But also check test method name changed but the removed scenario (aprofundamento medico sem suspeita exige caracterizar) no longer covered. If the previous behavior (before this test change) was actually that the validator DID require caracterização whenever aprofundamento_only was true (regardless of suspect), then adding descaracter_suspect='1' makes the test continue to pass while the "sem suspeita" negative path (which is what the validator expects now) would be the real behavior. Since the validator code (unchanged) only requires characterization when suspect is set, adding the flag makes the test reflect the true contract. If the original test was passing before (without flag), it would mean the validator previously required characterization without suspect — contradiction. Unless... the previous test didn't actually reach the caracterizar block because some earlier validation error path short-circuits? Let me verify: the validator `validate` may return early with errors before reaching the caracterizar block? The validator likely returns all errors (accumulates), not early exit. If earlier in `validateAcidentePessoal` the caracterizar block is reached only when aprofundamento_only, yes. Actually, let me confirm by running mentally with the ORIGINAL payload (no suspect) and original assertions: The old test asserted errors contain 'caracterizado como acidente'. Given the current validator would not emit it without suspect, that assertion fails → test was red. So this change fixes a red test. So this PR includes a test fix not strictly offboarding-related (probably broken by a merged change). Fine. Given "review every file individually", final answer: We review each and produce concise feedback; if no issues, call task_done. Hmm, but I feel there might be an intended finding about the entity: e.g., mismatch with the `EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino` (same columns) leaving int typed, plus template `pensao_alimenticia` in termino reads from S2399 with getter int. But that's not this PR. Wait — actually, is there a possibility that this S2299 entity change from int→string causes a regression in the S2299 *templates* that persist from the front end: when the user opens existing data via `prevEvts.desligamento.percAliment` (now "30.00"), modifies and saves; the request's `$data['percAliment']` = "30.00", setter string, OK. Fine. One more possibility: `getPercAliment(): ?string` conflicts with Doctrine's *default value* when the DB has stored e.g., 30 as NUMERIC(10,2). MySQL returns "30.00". In dev environments with sqlite (tests), Doctrine decimal returns string "30" or "30.00"? For SQLite, Doctrine decimal returns "30" possibly; fine. OK. Final: no code_comment needed? Let me weigh posting one comment about the Ssma test being out of scope... The user specifically instructs scope issues are blocking; but a test-only correction usually is acceptable in a PR that needed a green CI. However, this PR did not change Ssma validator at all. So the test change is a pure test fix for a failure caused by an earlier change. It might not belong to the PR's declared scope (offboarding eSocial). But since the diff group is explicitly provided for review and this is the third file, we must address it. I could add a low-severity note: "Esta alteração de teste é do módulo SSMA e não pertence ao escopo declarado da PR (offboarding S-2299); se for apenas para destravar CI por comportamento já alterado em outra branch, considere mover para a PR correspondente." But actually is that a bug? No, more of a process note. It may be unnecessary noise. Actually, wait — maybe the correct finding is about the entity type change combined with the AutomationExecutionService which now persists via string and then later when sending event, `pens_alim` is integer while percAliment... not in review. Let me run one more check: The `saveEventS2299` repository (not modified) calls `setPercAliment($data['percAliment'] ?? null)`. `$data` includes values from the form (JS: percAliment from input `percentualPensao`). If that input has "30.5" — new setter with ?string param receives "30.5" string, good; DB 30.50. This is the improvement. OK let me check one suspicious point about the twig: this template is under `member_guides_esocial_termino` but the file name `motivo_desligamento` — and the original bug per the PR was in the "aba de desligamento". Wait: the PR's own bug description: "Corrigido erro ao abrir a aba de desligamento quando prevEvts.termino ainda não existe." Actually it says "aba de desligamento" broadly (eSocial member tab). Good, in scope. Let me look at what pages include this termino template. Not needed. Now, potential issue: In the template fix, when `prevEvts.termino` exists but is an entity whose property is named differently? EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino getNrProcTrab? confirm earlier: templates reference prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab in pensao file? Actually the quarentena file uses prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab? The motivo file references prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab. And S2399 entity has getNrProcTrab (repo line 132 shows getNrProcTrab). Good. I will now finalize: no issues to report; produce concise summary; call task_done. Actually hold on—I want to double-check one subtle type issue in the entity change more carefully. The property docblocks/attribute annotation column type for `percAliment` and `vrAlim` is decimal. Doctrine's DBAL maps decimal to string in PHP (getType decimal returns string). Yes. BUT — the setter now is `?string`, and getter `?string`. If any caller passes a non-numeric string like "abc" to the setter, Doctrine will attempt to store to decimal column → could throw or store 0 depending on DB. Before (int setter) "abc" coerced to 0. Now "abc" is stored as string; MySQL in non-strict mode coerces to 0 with a warning. Not a new security issue. OK, truly finalize. Let me write final summary in pt-BR and call task_done. Wait — before finalizing, we need to double check the SsmaEventValidatorTest is an "Unit test" and the diff hunk includes lines around 846 to 879 (context lines - removed/added). Fine. Actually — hmm, let me reconsider whether there might be a subtle failure: test changed method name to "...ComSuspeitaExigeCaracterizar". But there's another test that covers creation without suspect not requiring caracterizar (`testToastAprofundamentoIncompletoUsaMensagensHumanasDoPrint` doesn't set aprofundamento_only; it's creation path with incomplete details). Actually the "criação não exige caracterizar" test at 794 is about aprofundamento... it has aprofundamento_complete => true but not aprofundamento_only. It asserts caracterizar not required at creation. Fine. I think there might be a test for creation with aprofundamento_only? Not our scope. OK. Concluding now. Actually, let me reconsider once more: Is there a mismatch: `descaracter_suspect` details key, and SsmaController at line 26795-26796 normalizes details['descaracter_suspect'] to int (0/1), while validator treats `!== '0'` and `!empty()`. If payload passes int 1, `!empty($d['descaracter_suspect'])` true and `1 !== '0'` true → hasSuspect. Good. In test passes '1' string. fine. No code issues found. I'll produce the summary and finish. Let me write the final response in Portuguese summarizing per-file conclusions, and call task_done.
Analisei individualmente os três arquivos do grupo de revisão, com leitura do contexto cruzado (entidade/coluna no banco, repositório, controlador que monta `prevEvts`, validador SSMA e a nova automação em `AutomationExecutionService`). ## Resultado da revisão **`src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php`** A troca de `?int` para `?string` nos getters/setters de `percAliment` e `vrAlim` está correta e alinhada com o schema: a coluna `perc_aliment`/`vr_alim` da tabela `esocial_s2299_evt_desligamento` é `NUMERIC(10, 2)` (confirmado na migration original `Version20250401194424`), e o Doctrine mapeia decimal como string. Com o tipo `?int` anterior, valores como `30.50` eram truncados para `30` na escrita/leitura. A nova automação (`decimalOrNull` retorna string formatada com 2 casas, ex.: `"30.00"`) depende dessa correção. Os consumidores existentes (repositório, `FlowableVariablesService`, templates) apenas repassam o valor para exibição/serialização e não fazem comparação estrita com inteiro — não identifiquei regressão prática. Não há `declare(strict_types=1)` no arquivo, então chamadas legadas passando `int` continuam coerção normal. **`templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig`** A correção do guard de `prevEvts.desligamento` para `prevEvts.termino` está correta e consistente com o restante do template (todas as outras linhas já checam `prevEvts.termino`). O objeto `prevEvts.termino` é o `EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino`, que possui `nrProcTrab`. A condição anterior acessava `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` sem garantir que `termino` existisse — exatamente o erro relatado no escopo da PR ao abrir a aba sem evento anterior. Mudança dentro do escopo declarado. **`tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php`** A adição de `descaracter_suspect => '1'` e a renomeação do teste alinham o cenário ao contrato atual do validador (`SsmaEventValidator`), que só exige a caracterização do acidente quando há suspeita marcada (`!empty($d['descaracter_suspect']) && $d['descaracter_suspect'] !== '0'`). Sem esse campo, o teste estaria vermelho, pois o erro `'caracterizado como acidente'` não seria emitido. Trata-se de correção de teste compatível com o comportamento existente — sem impacto funcional. Não encontrei defeitos bloqueantes, riscos de segurança, problemas de isolamento por empresa ou de integridade de dados introduzidos pelos três arquivos.
Tool Calls (1)
task_done
Show Details
{"state": "DONE"}