Session: 95108ac9-1653-4868-a1d4-0045b2baab83
Coverage
8
Selected
8
Completed
0
Reused
0
Failed
0
Waived
Token Usage
3.06M
Prompt Tokens
86.19K
Completion Tokens
3.14M
Total Tokens
32
LLM Requests
2.79M
Cache Read
0
Cache Write
1
LLM Failures
File breakdown 2 files
| File | Prompt | Completion | Cache Read | Cache Write | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| public/css/ssma/action_plan_panel.css,public/js/ssma/action_… | 3.06M | 85.95K | 2.79M | 0 | 3.14M |
| File Grouping | 466 | 239 | 0 | 0 | 705 |
Files Reviewed 8 files
- public/css/ssma/action_plan_panel.css
- templates/ssma/action_plan/index.html.twig
- public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js
- templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig
- templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel.html.twig
- templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig
- templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig
- templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig
Session Tasks 1 tasks
File Grouping 1 requests
grouping_task
Request #1
deepseek-v4-flash
P:466 C:239
1730ms
Reasoning
We need to group changed files. All seem related to action plan panel: css, js, templates for action plan. Likely one group. Need output JSON array with label and files.
[
{
"label": "Action plan panel feature",
"files": [
"public/css/ssma/action_plan_panel.css",
"public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js",
"templates/ssma/action_plan/index.html.twig",
"templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig",
"templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig",
"templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig",
"templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel.html.twig",
"templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig"
]
}
]
Conversations 1 files
public/css/ssma/action_plan_panel.css,public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js,templates/ssma/action_plan/index.html.twig,templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig,templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig,templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig,templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel.html.twig,templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig 32 requests
plan_task
Request #1
deepseek-v4-flash
P:66.97K C:16.66K CR:1.41K CW:0
137016ms
Reasoning
The user wants me to analyze the code changes and produce a structured review plan. The output should be in Portuguese (pt-BR) with a specific format. I should NOT actually call the tools — just describe the intent on `→` lines.
Let me analyze each file:
1. **public/css/ssma/action_plan_panel.css** (new file, 1252 lines) — CSS for the action plan panel. Mostly visual, big file. Risk: minimal functional risk; perhaps `color-mix` compatibility, `@container` support, but those are low priority. It's a new CSS file. Hard to have many risks. Possibly: usage of `color-mix` might not be supported in older browsers; `:has()` selector in the twig inline CSS. Let me think — CSS review rules are mostly about correctness/security/performance/maintainability. A 1252-line CSS file is big but it's a new file; maintainability concern might be mentioned. For this task, I need to focus on issues.
2. **public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js** (new, 3153 lines) — big. Key risk points:
- XSS: `escapeHtml` usage — many places properly escape. But note `buildAdrianaInsightsHtml` returns `<li>' + item + '</li>` — item comes from server-side (semantic insights). If those insights contain user-controlled HTML, this could be XSS. Need to check who produces the insight content — likely AI-generated (Adriana). This is a potential XSS issue: insights inserted via innerHTML without escaping. Actually in the Twig partial, insights use `{{ insight|raw }}` too (`_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig` line `<li>{{ insight|raw }}</li>`). Both JS and Twig treat insights as raw HTML. If the insight text comes from data that includes user content or AI-generated content referencing user data, that might be an XSS vector depending on the backend service. This deserves a check via code_search on where insights come from.
- `escapeHtml` only escapes `& < > "` — doesn't escape single quotes. Used in HTML attribute contexts with double quotes, so OK. But wait — `escapeHtml` is used for attribute values inside double quotes, e.g., `title="' + escapeHtml(name) + '"`. Single quote not escaped but double-quoted attributes are fine. But it doesn't escape backticks — in a double quoted attribute, backticks could matter in some contexts? Not really in HTML attribute. Actually backticks don't break a double-quoted attribute. OK.
- Use of `var` everywhere — system rule says "Using `var` is strictly prohibited; use `let` or `const`". However, this is a legacy-style IIFE; but the rule says strict. This would be a style/low issue ("Achado de estilo puro ... sem efeito real deve ser curto e de prioridade baixa"). Actually rules for the JS file strongly prohibit `var`. But per user-specific rules, pure style without real effect should be low priority. There is a mandatory-sounding rule but the comment example says style findings should be short and low priority. I can note it as low.
- The HTML has an inline script tag including `html2canvas` from CDN both in `_tab_painel.html.twig` (script tag at bottom) AND also dynamically loads it via `ensureHtml2Canvas()`. Duplicate loading — the script is loaded twice (static tag plus dynamic loader). The dynamic loader checks `window.html2canvas` first, so OK. But that's a double CDN load in the page; also the page further loads highcharts etc. Actually static script tag loads html2canvas regardless — every page load downloads ~1MB from CDN even if user never exports. That's a performance concern: the big html2canvas (1.4.1 min ~ 1MB) is loaded on every panel page load unconditionally, despite the JS also having an on-demand loader. In fact the `ensureHtml2Canvas` on-demand path will be dead because the script is already loaded. So this is both a dead-code / duplicated-loading issue. Should flag: the static `<script src="https://cdnjs...html2canvas...">` in `_tab_painel.html.twig` is unnecessary because `action_plan_panel.js` already implements lazy loading — it causes extra page weight and third-party dependency (external CDN; environment may be offline — but since existing code references cloudflare cdn, maybe OK). Medium performance issue.
- Also `ensureHtml2Canvas` loads from `https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/html2canvas/1.4.1/html2canvas.min.js` — external CDN in production. Content-Security-Policy may block it; no fallback besides error message.
- `document.addEventListener('click', ...)` global with `.closest('#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .ssma-adriana-suggest-q')`. The `bindTableViewButtons` re-bind on every table update: it uses `root.querySelectorAll(...).forEach(btn => btn.addEventListener('click', ...))` after each render. But `updatePendenciasTable` destroys and recreates rows via `tbody.innerHTML`, and then calls `bindTableViewButtons` again — but buttons previously bound are gone from DOM. They re-add on new elements; no double-bind because elements are new. But `bindAdrianaQuestions` is delegated with a global guard. `bindTableViewButtons` adds listeners directly; each new button element is new, so no double binds. OK.
- `openActionViewOffcanvas` uses `getElementById('ssma-ap-action-view-title')` and related ids — but the offcanvas template (`_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig`) defines the fields with `data-ap-detail="title"` etc., not ids like `ssma-ap-action-view-title`. This is a contract mismatch! The offcanvas partial has `data-ap-detail="title"` fields and the JS `openActionViewOffcanvas` looks for `ssma-ap-action-view-title`, `ssma-ap-action-view-id`, `ssma-ap-action-view-origin`, etc. These ids don't exist in the new offcanvas template. Also it tries `window.openOffcanvasssmaApActionView()`; if that function doesn't exist, falls back to `#ssmaApActionView` jQuery modal or canvas `#ssmaApActionView-offcanvas-wrapper`. In the embed `_modal_offcanvas.html.twig` with `modal_id: 'ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas'`, ids would be like `ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas-offcanvas-wrapper` (as seen in CSS in the offcanvas file: `#ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas-offcanvas-wrapper`). The JS looks for `document.getElementById('ssmaApActionView-offcanvas-wrapper') || document.getElementById('ssmaApActionViewOffcanvas')`, and jQuery `$('#ssmaApActionView').modal('show')`. These don't match `ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas`. Also the buttons set `data-action-*` from the JS-rendered rows in `buildPendenciasTableRowHtml` — those match the JS side, but the offcanvas field element ids don't match. Actually, in `_tab_painel.html.twig` there's also a SSR version of rows with only `data-action-id` attribute and no `data-action-title` etc. (`data-action-id="{{ row.id }}"` only). The JS `buildPendenciasTableRowHtml` for later AJAX updates adds full data attributes and the buttons call `openActionViewOffcanvas(btn)` reading `data-action-title` etc. But the offcanvas itself is expected to be populated by the id-based setters which target ids that don't exist; there's a mismatch, since `_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig` uses `data-ap-detail` attributes and doesn't define the ids used by JS. `setText('ssma-ap-action-view-title', title)` won't find any element. Also `document.getElementById('ssmaApActionView')` and `openOffcanvasssmaApActionView` are never defined in the JS file — they must come from elsewhere, but the modal/offcanvas partial defines a different id (`ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas`). So clicking "Visualizar" probably either fails to open or opens an empty offcanvas with unchanged placeholder values. This is a high-severity functional bug candidate — a UI contract mismatch between the JS and the offcanvas markup. Need to verify via code_search for ids in both files, and for `openOffcanvasssmaApActionView` definition. The offcanvas is embedded presumably in another template (maybe `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` includes it). Let me search whether any id `ssma-ap-action-view-title` exists. That's a good `code_search` target.
- Also where is `_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig` included? It's a new partial; maybe included somewhere else in action plan tab. Need to check with `file_find`/`code_search` for includes.
- `data-action-origin-url` in buildPendenciasTableRowHtml - origin URL from row data could be a `javascript:` URL if server data is compromised or user-controlled. `href="' + escapeHtml(originUrl) + '"` — escapeHtml doesn't strip `javascript:` scheme. Typically origin_url is a server-constructed route. Low/medium concern but not necessarily within threat model since it's an internal link generated by backend. Given server sets it, low priority; but if user controls origin URL (external site or javascript), a javascript: URI would be rendered. Possibly low.
- `mergePanelData` re-serializes full panelData into DOM `#ssma-ap-panel-data-json` textContent. If panelData is big (table rows and chart data and semantic), that big string is stored each time — fine.
- Chart lifecycle: `destroyOverviewCharts`, `showChartEmpty` etc.
- Race conditions on fetches handled via gen counter and AbortController.
- `panelFilterDebounce` retained after `runPanelFilterRequest`? Not cleared but fine.
- In `applyPendenciasDom`, when server response includes `resp.view === 'pendencias'`; then merge and `applyPendenciasDom`. But updatePendenciasTable destroys DataTable each response and re-creates asynchronously via `MetahumanDataTables.whenReady`. Potential double DataTable init if callback invoked twice; there is isDataTable guard.
- `switchView` triggered from `onPainelTabVisible` and pills. When switching to visao_geral from pendencias, `destroyOverviewCharts()` first, then... Actually in switchView: `if viewId === 'pendencias'` destroy overview, renderPendenciasCharts. For visao geral: destroyPendenciasCharts; then if overviewData exists applyOverviewDom; if (!overviewChartsRendered) renderOverviewCharts... and renderOverviewCharts has guard only if section not d-none. Fine.
- `renderOverviewCharts` calls `initDistributionCharts()` → `window.initSsmaActionPlanCharts()`, external dependency on separate JS; also destroy methods may double-init. Not necessarily an issue in scope.
- `updateOverviewKpiRow`: There is a bug candidate — `kpiFooterText(kpi.footer)` — for overview data `updateOverviewKpiRow` maps `footerText: indicator.footer || indicator.unit || ''`, and then calls again. Fine.
- `showPanelToast` etc.
- `applyApPainelPeriodPreset` in `syncApPainelPeriodPresetUI`: `today.setHours(0,0,0,0)`; For `week`, `end.setDate(end.getDate() + 7)` — label says "Próxima semana", but diffDaysInclusive would include today... but note start date = today, end = today+7. For "next_month", end=+30 days. All approximations. For fortnight +15 days. Probably by design (aproximations).
- A potential bug in `syncApPainelPeriodPresetUI` — when date inputs parse; nothing wrong.
- The overview page reset: `applyOverviewPeriodPreset` sets page=1 then sync triggers.
- `getOverviewPaginationPages` logic: when `currentPage >= totalPages - half + 1`... let's test totalPages=10, maxButtons=7 half=3, currentPage=8: condition 8 >= 10-3+1=8 true: pages=[1, 'ellipsis', for i=totalPages-(maxButtons-3)=10-4=6 to 10: 6,7,8,9,10], so [1,...,6,7,8,9,10] that's 7 items total: 1 + ellipsis + 5 numbers = 7. OK.
For currentPage<=half (<=3): [1,2,3,4,5,ellipsis,10] — 5 numbers + 2. OK.
Middle e.g., currentPage=5: [1, ellipsis,4,5,6, ellipsis,10] = 7. OK.
- `updateOverviewPagination` builds info as "Mostrando X de Y ações" where X=current*perPage is the last item shown; but initially current 1, to=perPage. Fine though not showing "de X até Y". Not a bug.
- In the table footer markup: DataTable pagination CSS static. There's potential mismatch between server-side pagination in overview and table's `_table_card` with `paging:false` — intentionally implemented custom pagination in renderOverviewCharts? Actually the outer table `ssma-ap-overview-table` has `paging: false, info: false` Datatable options, so pagination handled manually.
Big issue candidates:
- High: XSS via Adriana insights raw HTML both in JS innerHTML and Twig `|raw`. Need to trace to source of insights content. In Twig partial: `<li>{{ insight|raw }}</li>` — directly injecting raw server content as HTML. And JS `buildAdrianaInsightsHtml` returns `<li>' + item + '</li>` — if `item` includes user-authored content (e.g., AI summaries referencing user text), this is an XSS opportunity. Need to check backend service `SsmaActionPlanPanelService` to see what insight contents are. code_search for text. If the insight is just composed text with formatting from trusted server model, might be acceptable; but user rules say never `|raw` on user-saved values. The content could be AI-generated summarizing user-entered action names — AI could echo text verbatim without escaping HTML, enabling stored XSS (a malicious user creates action title `<img src=x onerror=...>`, AI repeats it in insights). So this is a real security concern; likely medium-high. We need to check the backend to see sources. Plan: code_search for panel semantic generation. We don't have the backend file in the diff; but we can search codebase for e.g. `high_risk_factors`, `common_factors`, `main_insights`.
- Also SSR part of `_tab_painel.html.twig` KPI, table rows and cells built with Twig then inserted as `title_cell|trim` etc. Those are inside `ap_table_rows` used by `_table_card`, which likely renders collections with `row.titulo` maybe as raw? The Twig cells escape via components? Not fully knowable; `title_cell` content: `{{ row.title }}`, and other fields `{{ row.action_id }}` etc auto-escaped. The whole set is passed to `_table_card.html.twig` rows; that component presumably iterates row fields and outputs. `titulo` cell is HTML already built (safe since inner escapes). Then goes as a column value — table card handles with maybe `|raw`? If the component escapes each cell, we'd see escaped HTML— not a security risk but visual bug potential. Hard to assess without component. We can note as needing check, medium/low.
- On view switch pills with keyboard no keydown handler; a11y minor low.
- `fetch(PANEL_FILTER_URL...` — GET requests with no CSRF needed; fine.
- It doesn't check `resp.success` when response was non-JSON? `response.json()` failure triggers catch and generic error toast.
- Double click: `switchView` calls `renderOverviewCharts()` on each switch to visao_geral... guard there `if (!overviewChartsRendered)` so ok. But renderPendenciasCharts path in `switchView('pendencias')` from repeated pill clicks re-renders charts each click after destroying overview — destroyPendenciasCharts and renderPendenciasCharts will call destroyChart again; but only if chart exists. Fine, plus render every time pill pendencias clicked; also triggers filter in the pill event for visao_geral only, not pendencias. On first init `switchView(currentView)` called, triggers not filters unless charts empty — then `triggerPanelFilter` with currentView. Good.
- In pill event for `visao_geral`, after `switchView` (which may call `renderOverviewCharts` with SSR overview if overviewData exists), then `syncOverviewFilterState(); triggerPanelFilter('visao_geral');` Double re-render/flickers, two HTTP round-trips on first pill click; acceptable? Some concern about performance/duplicate requests though debounce 120ms merges only same view; the overviewChartsRendered could render once with SSR then async fetch. Note: if no overviewData (first visit), switchView→destroyPendenciasCharts→renderOverviewCharts with no data (guard prevents charts) → continues... then filter request returns and renders. OK.
- `onPainelTabVisible` calls `switchView(currentView)` then possibly `triggerPanelFilter(currentView)`. `switchView` for `visao_geral` triggers filter? no. Then if panelData no charts, triggers filter. Multiple events: DOMContentLoaded direct check, document click on link with target, custom tabShown event, resize... each tab showing triggers; but only one initial; after first `initialized` calls `switchView(currentView)` each time. Could double-trigger panel filter for currentView each time the tab is shown. And the initial condition: `if (!panelData || !panelData.charts)` triggers filter; when tab becomes visible again after a previous pendencias update, panelData.charts exists so no filter unless SSR labels empty. Possibly user sees stale data; design issue, functional medium maybe; but not necessarily.
- Debounce of filters and abort old requests seems right.
- `panelChartsPrintBusy`; `iframe` printing: `iframe.onload` fires after srcdoc, and print. There's this `win.focus(); win.print()` — expected.
- `buildPrintDocumentHtml` with CSS string interp; dataURL escapes? `captured.dataUrl` is `data:image/png;base64,...` inserted into `src` attribute, fine.
- call `captureEl.scrollIntoView` — while printing, this scrolls main page maybe not a real issue.
- In buildPrintSectionsHtml, for panels with panel captureType 'panel', captured section for `ssma-ap-operational-summary`. hasRenderablePrintSection: `panel captureType` checks content exists. Fine.
- Potential break of chart render: `renderOriginChart` point percentage uses `r.percentage` property; if absent, `point.percentage` in Highcharts dataLabels formatter is computed by Highcharts automatically (this.point.percentage is computed for column). In Highcharts column, `point.percentage` exists when... Actually `percentage` property of the point is computed relative to the stack totals or each point? For a plain column series, `point.percentage` is computed as y/total of all points based on chart? Might produce NaN or correct values. They check `null`, else '0'. Might be buggy in chart labels — visual only.
Now, the most relevant issues to keep and verify with tool plan:
1. (high) Offcanvas visualizar ação: JS expects ids `ssma-ap-action-view-*`, `#ssmaApActionView-offcanvas-wrapper`, `openOffcanvasssmaApActionView`, but the offcanvas component defines `ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas` with `data-ap-detail`. Need code_search to confirm no id definitions anywhere else. Also offcanvas include location unknown (no include in _tab_painel or index). Neither did new files include this partial. Possibly included by another file in change group not shown? The other files note says empty `other_changed_files`. In templates/ssma/action_plan/index.html.twig changed, no include of offcanvas partial. So risk that `_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig` is never included — dead partial; the JS referencing might be from an older arrangement. This is high functional — clicking action shows empty/fails. We must check for references via code_search to plan review: `file_find` for "action_plan_view_offcanvas" and code_search of IDs like `ssmaApActionView-offcanvas-wrapper`, `openOffcanvasssmaApActionView`, `ssma-ap-action-view-title` and `data-ap-detail`.
2. (high/medium) XSS with `|raw` in insights partial and unescaped item insertion in JS `buildAdrianaInsightsHtml`; verify content source from backend — code_search for insight generation in PHP service/twig (e.g., search `main_insights`, `follow_up_questions`, `high_risk_factors` across codebase) and for occurrence panel twins (there's `_panel_semantic_adriana_styles` included, occurrence panel exists). Verify whether same pattern exists there (existing standard, then it may be accepted pattern though std could still be risky) — but for plan, mention verifying data origin, and sanitization strategy.
3. (medium) Duplicate html2canvas load (static script in `_tab_painel.html.twig` + dynamic loading in JS) — unnecessary ~1MB+ per page for all users even without exporting; also third-party CDN with no SRI (subresource integrity), network dependency; should be on-demand (lazy) or only include when the export button is available. Medium performance/architecture.
4. (medium) `buildPendenciasTableRowHtml` origin_url link: sets anchor `href` without scheme allowlist — `javascript:` scheme possible if `origin_url` contains a `javascript:` string; escapeHtml doesn't neutralize it, and it's rendered into innerHTML in updatePendenciasTable. In most cases server-controlled, but if origin_url originates from data filled by users (e.g., events with "link"), potential XSS vector. Verify server's origin_url construction. Medium-low maybe. Since likely server-generated route, low.
5. In `_tab_painel.html.twig`, KPI cards SSR are created once; cards count from SSR `panel.kpis` and may later be updated by JS (updateKpiRow) which uses existing DOM cards mapped by index — if filtered response returns fewer kpis than SSR cards, old extra cards remain (leftover) or if more, it falls back... `updateKpiRow` when `cards.length` returns them and iterates `kpis.forEach` on each index; if `kpis.length > cards.length` remaining KPI data is not appended (single card index null). That's actually mismatched counts could show stale values? panels probably keep fixed count. Edge but low/medium. Same with overview row. Could ask to handle mismatch by rebuilding count when array lengths differ. Low.
6. (medium) In Twig SSR `_tab_painel.html.twig` the `_table_card` rows built with titulo cell etc containing raw XSS risk? Actually inside Twig cells content escaped but joining into `ap_table_rows` arrays used by `_table_card.html.twig`: verify the table card treats these cell values as raw HTML but those are safe because all interpolations escaped? The cells include `{{ row.title }}` auto escaped, `{% include %}` components sanitized. `titulo: title_cell|trim` stores HTML then component likely performs `|raw` when rendering... so values are server-rendered. The data attributes for action buttons in SSR: only `data-action-id` gets created. The JS button handler reads from data-action? In `openActionViewOffcanvas(btn)`, SSR table buttons only define data-action-id (no title/origin...). So if user clicks an SSR row before any AJAX refresh, JS will assign default "Ação", "—", etc. Combined with not matching IDs the offcanvas would show all placeholders. This is part of same issue #1.
7. (medium) In `_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig` uses inline `<style>` inside an offcanvas partial? Actually the offcanvas partial includes full `<style>` block within the twig partial outside of embed—this style block inside partial embedded wherever used and inside body of page, off canvas; using `<style>` tags embedded in DOM is valid but should live in CSS asset (per system CSS maintainability?). Low/style.
8. `_tab_painel.html.twig` includes `<link rel=stylesheet...>` plus `<script charset... highcharts_loader>`; inline `<style>` blocks add CSS in the middle of template, again maintainability note.
9. `:has` CSS selector in index.html.twig head style — support in evergreen fine; older browsers (pre-2023 Safari) ignore selector only for that rule — could break sticky header; subtle: not blocking.
10. In the JS, `resetCustomSelect` function is dead code? It's defined but never called? Let me scan: `resetCustomSelect` appears defined; is it used anywhere in file? I don't see calls in provided content. Dead code rules will flag. Let me verify by searching in the JS: `function resetCustomSelect(selectId, defaultLabel) {`... no call visible. Also `showChartEmpty` etc used. `clearChartEmpty` used. `refreshApPanelPeriodLabel` used. `applyOverviewPeriodFromInputs`. `reflowDistributionCharts` used; `renderPendenciasCharts` uses wait. `updateAxisOptionsForPeriod` used. `panorama`? Possibly `resetCustomSelect` dead. Also `setApPanelFilterRowVisible` seems used in toggleHeaderFilters. Also `computeHBarSizing` used. `ensureDistributionChartsForExport` used. Also, `hasRenderablePrintSection` print. `kpiFooterText` used. Could flag `resetCustomSelect` and possibly a couple utilities dead; low severity.
11. Very large monolithic files: action_plan_panel.js 3153 lines; CSS 1252 lines; _tab_painel.html.twig 595 lines; _tab_painel_visao_geral 218. User-specific rule says big files should be flagged (god template/duplicated approach). Actually the user-specific Rule states as first priority — "Lógica duplicada / arquivo já grande — maior peso" for JS and "God template — maior peso" for Twig. action_plan_panel.js is 3,153 lines — definitely a signal. Also notice duplication between `updateKpiRow` and `updateOverviewKpiRow` that are nearly identical, and `applyOverview...`; duplicate logic (like existing occurrence panel probably exists in similar form, duplicating whole occurrence panel code — check `public/js/ssma/occurrence/panel.js` perhaps). This duplication should be a leading issue per user priority. Need to check existence of an occurrence panel JS (maybe `public/js/ssma/occurrence_panel.js`) with the same pattern — code_search for `ssma-ap-chart`, `buildAdrianaInsightsHtml` or similar function names. There is mention "mesmo padrão do Painel de Ocorrências". So duplicated code is high weight: extraction to shared helpers recommended. Medium severity by impact though priority per instructions is "maior peso".
12. Mixed concerns: bug in the period handling: `syncApPainelPeriodPresetUI` uses end.setDate(+90) for next_3_months rather than setMonth(+3); label and actual period may diverge slightly; AI? minor.
Let's also inspect other Twig/CSR interactions:
- `_tab_painel.html.twig` line: `{% set executor_key = executor_id ? 'member_' ~ executor_id : '' %}` in responsible icons partial. The macro uses `member.name|default(member.fullName|default(''))`; `avatar_colors[color_index % avatar_colors|length]` — precedence: `avatar_colors|length` filter inside array access? Twig parse: `avatar_colors[color_index % avatar_colors|length]` — filter has normally lower? Actually in Twig, the filter `|length` is applied to `avatar_colors`? Reading: expression `color_index % avatar_colors|length` — is parsed as `color_index % (avatar_colors|length)` because filter binds tighter? I believe filters have higher precedence than arithmetic binary operators? Twig operator precedence: filters have the highest precedence (`.` attribute, `[]`? Actually `|` filters are applied after concatenation etc. Let me recall, Twig precedence order (low to high): `or`, `and`, `not`, `==/!=/</>`, `+/-`, `*//`, `//` (floor div), `%`, `is`, `in`, `matches`, `starts with`, `ends with`, `..`, `?:`, `??`, `? :`, `~`, `[]`? Hmm. For array index after filter precedence: In Twig `{{ foo|length }}`; For `avatar_colors[color_index % avatar_colors|length]`, the filter applies to `color_index % avatar_colors`? e.g. uses gravatar? I'd need real parser. Usually filter precedence is lower than `.` but filters bind tighter than math? Let me recall: Twig: "Twig filter precedence: Filters have the highest precedence (they can be applied to any expression). Example: `{{ 1 + 2|length }}` is `1 + (2|length)`? no — `1..2|length`?" Hmm! Actually Twig docs operator precedence (lowest first): `b-and`, `b-xor`, `b-or`, `or`, `and`, `==`, `+ -`, `* /`, `// %`, `is`, `in`, `matches`, `starts with`, `ends with`, `..`, `?:` , `??`, `? :`, `~`, `[]`, `.`, `|`, `()`. Wait that ordering may be reversed: Docs order: `or` lowest, then `and`, then `== != < > >= <=`, then `in`, then `matches`, `starts with/ends with`, then `..`, then `+ -`, `~`, `* / // %`, `is`, then unary, then `**`? and filters have highest? I know `{{ 'a' ~ b|upper }}` doesn't apply upper to whole expression? Actually filter has high priority → `b|upper` first. So precedence of `|` high: `color_index % avatar_colors|length` → `color_index % (avatar_colors|length)`; then index `avatar_colors[(...)]`. So macro computes `color_index % count` fine.
- `render_responsible_avatar` uses macro param named `avatar_colors` and in Twig macro can have default values `avatar_colors` repeated. `background: {{ avatar_colors[color_index % avatar_colors|length] }};` okay.
- The photo url: asset('uploads/photos/' ~ member_photo) with member_photo possibly from user with .. or path traversal? Inside img src not security concern; escaping `member_photo` is not escaped, but filenames normally safe and asset path; values from db could include quotes. `style="background: {{ avatar_colors[...] }}"` etc. `member_photo` from DB could break attribute if contains quote. But avatar normally internal and uploaded path. Low.
- In JS, semantic summary `textContent`, but insights internal raw. And updateRecommendationBlock uses textContent.
- `buildSemanticPillGroup` escapes label/item labels.
- `buildPendenciasTableRowHtml`: data-action attributes escapeHtml on strings that will be read back via getAttribute then textContent assignment: safe. But origin label includes in attribute with double quote escaping fine. `escapeHtml` there escapes quotes so attribute value safe. In Twig SSR rows, action button data-action-id uses raw value `{{ row.id }}`, Twig auto-escape.
- The `escapeHtml` function used for URL `href` value, but URL not scheme-sanitized (issue noted).
Let's also evaluate the overview pagination: This custom table + datatable disabled may conflict with `_table_card` sets DataTable options `paging: false`. And the JS recreates rows from AJAX overview `action_details` only and calls `updateOverviewPagination`, leaving datatable options unchanged (they might not re-init since DataTable is not re-created by updateOverviewTable—it just sets `tbody.innerHTML`).
When the user switches pages the server returns new overview and pagination etc.
- One count mismatch: JS uses `to = current * perPage` as "Mostrando X de Y ações", while server may produce same? Perhaps.
Reading JS again about DataTables `updatePendenciasTable`:
```
if ($ && $.fn && $.fn.DataTable && $.fn.DataTable.isDataTable('#ssma-ap-panel-table')) {
$('#ssma-ap-panel-table').DataTable().clear().destroy();
}
tbody.innerHTML = rows...
bindTableViewButtons();
if (window.MetahumanDataTables && window.MetahumanDataTables.whenReady === 'function') {
window.MetahumanDataTables.whenReady('ssma-ap-panel-table', function () { ... init table ...} )
}
```
`bindTableViewButtons()` re-binds new buttons.
But since `_tab_painel.html.twig` table initially has DataTable from `_table_card`, after destroying, `whenReady` likely already fired once — whenReady returns maybe a promise fires immediately? if immediate then init. Later responses call whenReady again — it probably re-executes callback each time.
Potential double-binding: updateAxis, etc. No.
Now CSS: use `container-type: inline-size` on `.ssma-ap-ia-inner-body`; then in @container queries they select `#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns` and apply grid - container queries: queries apply only when nearest ancestor container exists. For SSR rows direct in #root with no ap-ia-inner container inside that subtree? semantics row is outside inner etc. `@container ap-ia-inner` matches only inside that named container; therefore rules inside apply only when nested within an element whose container-name ap-ia-inner, that contains both col-6 boxes inside the semantic row? The `.ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns` in SSR overview content not inside container element; hence those media rules won't apply; responsive columns default 1fr always → layout may behave differently from intended tablet/desktop multiple columns. Could be visual bug medium/low? It references class in the partial: overview semantic columns probably none in current partial — actually overview _action_plan_semantic_adriana uses overview.semantic items via buildOverviewSemanticHtml building `ssma-semantic-focus` blocks, not `ssma-ap-overview-semantic-*` markup. So rules unused. dead CSS—low.
CSS rule uses `color-mix(...)` perhaps older browsers fallback given they also set background with fallback? They give `background: color-mix(...);` without fallback together with declaration? line:
`background: color-mix(in srgb, var(--company-theme1-800, #0F3D4A) 12%, #fff);` If browser doesn't support color-mix, it does not parse and may also not have a previous valid background declaration → background could be transparent leaving button unstyled (unless fallback provided elsewhere?). On `.is-active`, earlier style from .ssma-ap-panel-view-pill sets `background: #fff`; on .is-active, if color-mix unsupported property value dropped so background stays #fff? In CSS, if the declaration can't parse, it's ignored and earlier background #fff remains. So acceptable; only if no previous background might fail but there is. Low.
The CSS `.mhs-pill` custom (ssma-ap-semantic-pill.mhs-pill) - etc.
Now cross-file: index.html.twig adds styles using `:has()` for sticky header etc. No functional issue.
`_tab_painel.html.twig`: has inline data JSON `panel|json_encode|raw` and in JS merge updates; if JSON contains `</script>` in any data (e.g., action title with `</script><script>...`), inserted raw into `<script type="application/json">` would break out of script and produce HTML injection (XSS) in SSR! Twig's `json_encode` outputs quotes; `|raw` avoids HTML escaping. JSON embed pattern requires escaping `</` to `<\/`; standard Symfony mitigations? They must escape `</script`. Since they use `|raw`, if a JSON string contains `</script>`, browser terminates the JSON script block early; the remainder could be parsed as HTML or script if crafted. This is a real stored XSS vector when action/plan content includes `</script>` (e.g., action title, description). The common robust way: `{{ data|json_encode|raw }}` is widely but must encode `U+2028/U+2029` and `</`? Many apps escape `<` etc for script json: `|escape('html_attr')`? Usually applying `json_encode` then using `raw` and replacing `</` with `<\/` is recommended.
The `script` tags: `ssma-ap-panel-config-json` contains only backend values? It contains filterUrl defaultPeriod etc — less risk, but filterUrl path internal; `panel|json_encode` includes `title`, `priority`, etc. Derived from user data (action content). If a malicious action title includes `</script><script>alert(1)</script>`, the page executing raw script will do XSS. Definitely flag as security high from SSRF? As SSR rendering on index-level; yes this is standard script-json embedding vulnerability — need escaping `</` etc. I should check `_panel` existing pattern maybe same as other module (occurrence panel uses same technique?). The same pattern exists in occurrences (_panel_dashboard?). The diff's JSON parse populates `.textContent` of these elements in merge anyway. Provide verify with code_search for other JSON script pattern to confirm consistent project style (`json_encode|raw` in script tags). But, must still flag as security concern: data from DB should be encoded to prevent breaking out. Twig autoescape doesn't apply within `<script>`? Wait—this is a `text/template` inside? They placed the `<script type="application/json" id...>` around `{{ ...|json_encode|raw }}`; Twig's autoescape does NOT protect inside script context? Actually Twig does not change inside `<script>` unless the strategy html does escaping; `|raw` prevents. So valid. However autoescaped HTML inside script would break JSON but not XSS; with raw, dangerous. Need highlighting.
Note: `json_encode` escapes slashes? By default `json_encode` constant JSON_HEX_TAG not used; PHP's `json_encode` output `</script>` unescaped? Actually Symfony's `json_encode` filter? If implemented via `json_encode` with JSON_HEX_TAG...? The Twig json_encode filter calls PHP json_encode without flags, no escaping of slash; risks.
- Flag as high/medium security.
Also `title` and other in `escapeHtml` handle quotes.
In JS: `document.currentScript`? no.
Let's craft issues and tools.
We have to output: `Summary:` then `Issues` numbered and sorted high→medium→low. Each line uses tool name and args and reason — the instructions: "Tools are for reference purposes only and must not be actually invoked; describe the calling intent" — note that we are forbidden to call the tools (but they will be called by agent later). Output in pt-BR.
Numbers: from 1 to N; sort high→medium→low.
Potential issue list to include (avoid fabricating things; for CSS might mention no issues or one low about responsiveness). Let's focus on the important:
**Issue 1 high** — `openActionViewOffcanvas`/offcanvas contract mismatch and partial never included/IDs don't match. Combine? Both point to "visualizar ação" broken: the SSR rows button only has data-action-id; JS populates fields with IDs that don't exist in any changed file; fallback togglers point to other IDs and reference global `openOffcanvasssmaApActionView` not defined and `#ssmaApActionView`, while markup id is `ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas`. Even actual include location appears absent from changed template (no include in index or tab). Severity high: core action of table won't display details; also likely partial never included. Should combine as one high issue with subelements, or split into two? "The view button in the action table opens a details offcanvas that won't render the selected row: the new partial that exists uses field ids / modal ids that don't align with the ones the JS expects." Tools: code_search across whole repo for `ssma-ap-action-view-title` and `openOffcanvasssmaApActionView` and `ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas` to confirm definitions, includes of `_action_plan_view_offcanvas`, `file_find action_plan` etc.
**Issue 2 high** — XSS via `|raw` inside insights list and JS `buildAdrianaInsightsHtml` interpolação bruta, with generated AI content possibly echoing unescaped user text from ação title/descrição. Tools: search backend for `common_factors|high_risk_factors|main_insights|follow_up_questions` PHP/Twig to see source & whether sanitized; compare with `buildAdrianaInsightsHtml` placement... Also search existing occurrence panel where `{{ insight|raw }}` pattern may exist (`panel_semantic_adriana` partials) to establish if trusted format.
**Issue 3 high/medium** — JSON config/data embedded raw in `<script type="application/json">` with `|raw`; if any `</script>` in data breaks DOM/script or injects markup, stored XSS by a user that writes action titles/descriptions. Tools: code_search to confirm no escaper used elsewhere? Inspect parsePanelData uses JSON.parse of textContent only; security risk from HTML not JS parse. If user content includes `</script>` only in their own browser? The value is server stored — view by other users, especially high-privilege managers viewing panel; All SSMA pages likely accessible same perms. Medium-high. Need to assess per the actual data source: table rows with `row.title`, description... action text user-entered ⇒ medium-high. Mark high? Keep high if actual stored content. We cannot confirm content sources from diff; searching will check. Since review plan, set severity with clear conditions; but the format requires one severity tag. I'd set medium-high? Using "high" if valid, but reviewers prefer high for stored XSS.
Given absence of proof user-controlled string ends up there, mark medium? Yet also on same page SSR KPI/eads loops properly escape Twig. The JSON is panel data from service that returns processed info to show in the chart/JS; the provenance may include user fields. Potential but likely. Medium issue then, but careful: The JS `buildPendenciasTableRowHtml` escapes, so only raw JSON itself at risk.
There's also another **JS risk**: putting a potentially large JSON in the static page: `panel|json_encode|raw`; and mergePanelData triggers this again. If data includes `</script>` even without user control, no break; depends.
Actually in HTML script raw JSON pattern is really common and usually is okay because `</script>` within a JSON string could close; if followed by other text, it gets parsed as markup. Example `title: "</script><img src=x onerror=alert(1)>"` -> `JSON.parse` would still parse if text doesn't interfere: The HTML parser stops at `</script>` regardless of JSON quoting; closing tag recognition does not check quotes inside script data state? In `script data` state, `</script>` closes element no matter if inside a JS string: process: the HTML parser treats `</script>` case-insensitively as a close tag unless it is escaped by `\/`. So yes external `</script>` closes; leftover markup executes/hides; often payload `</script><script>alert(1)</script>` executes. That is a genuine, classic stored XSS scenario; even the SSR table's other copies use escaped HTML? Wait multiple renderings:
- Data could already be displayed in original HTML through Twig where `{{ }}` escapes `<`, so outside.
- JSON script on page now dangerously shows raw.
Therefore any user created an action with `</script>` sequence stored in field results in registered XSS across session of any supervisor viewing Plan Panel. That is classic. Since permission model in place (ssmaCanManageConfig etc.) but each viewer able to open data; unauthorized content (CSV) etc also potential. Even if untrusted user input isn't obviously in json fields (titles are in table row), it's likely. Severity high with instruction to replace `</` with `<\/` or `escape('js')`/JSON_HEX_TAG.
**Issue 4 medium** — html2canvas duplicated loading: static `<script>` plus JS-on-demand loader; adds huge third-party to whole page. mention production network dependency / possible CSP blocking; recommend removing static tag and SRI. Tools: code_search for html2canvas includings across codebase to compare pattern? optional.
**Issue 5 medium** — duplicated & 'god' file: JS 3,153 + CSS 1,252 + partial 595, duplicated KPI update logic & Adriana render logic between pendências/visão geral; duplication with occurrence panel (existing similar) — per user-specific priority "maior peso"; request shared helpers and refactoring. Tools: code_search for common function names in occurrence panel files to confirm duplication and scope of reuse (`file_find occurrence panel`, code_search `buildAdrianaInsightsHtml|showChartEmpty` with file patterns `public/js/ssma/`), also check template existing include.
Maybe split god-file and duplication:
- (medium) Sinalizar arquivo e motivos: Monolithic file of 3k lines implementing multiple views plus export, filters, etc (god-file/duplication) — strong maintainability; suggest splitting into modules/helpers. Combine duplication in one issue to not inflate.
This is medium because impact maintainability/future; user rule says prioridade alta though. I'll set medium-high? We have severity definitions: medium—maintainability. Keep **medium**; ordering after medium high.
**Issue 6 medium** — SSR/JS contract of endpoint filter response: response expected `resp.panel`, `resp.view`, `resp.active_axis`; update table maps `backend` errors using generic; a check needed given the module may be new endpoint; verify button actually available. Also the twig table initial SSR rows provide only `data-action-id` attribute, while the JS `openActionViewOffcanvas` reads multiple values from row (data-action-title) → clicking SSR rows lacking the data shows dash; likely part of same high issue #1 but separate presentation? If table refresh will replace rows then user sees a refresh after first filter. SSR default on page load: click any row before AJAX completes will trigger default values. Maybe low/medium. I might merge into Issue 1 high (contract offcanvas).
**Issue 7 medium** — XSS via `origin_url` `href`: escapeHtml does not remove `javascript:` schemes and the URL may originate from user data (occurrence events often link to items) while server generating. Might flag low instead (requires allowlist/scheme sanitation before injecting into href via HTML; although typical safe usage). Actually if the URL is e.g., `javascript:alert(document.cookie)` reflected from a record, since the server echoes the link and managers click, that gives XSS. The rule from user says never add link without http(s) scheme allowlist. I'll include low.
**Issue 8 medium/low** — innerHTML updates via DataTable destroy + rebuild repeatedly on each filter: clearing HTML on filter with many rows & charts re-render high frequency — potential flicker/performance; acceptable pattern; not necessary.
**Issue 9 low** — JS rules: `var` everywhere; nested ternaries? I saw nested ternary? not severe. `var` prohibited. ESLint type rules maybe legacy project style; but JS file rule bullets are mandatory and system instructions. Mark as low style.
Actually the JS file uses `var` entire file + IIFE, clearly adopting older project style; could clash heavily, but the user rule says: find style point with no real effect must be low and short. It still violates mandatory rule stated by system, so add low.
**Issue 10 low** — CSS dead selectors/responsive classes: `.ssma-ap-overview-semantic-*` rules intended inside container; no markup using them; chart-hosts classes `.ssma-ap-chart-sm/md/lg`? (define classes not used? they probably used indirectly?). Since no issue? Keep low: CSS new file; dead code selectors; duplicated inline `<style>` + CSS asset; maintainability.
**Issue 11 low** — index.html.twig `defaultPlanoTab` with sticky styles used; not concern.
Maybe add another Medium: In `action_plan_panel.js` AJAX data requests do not send CSRF but GET idempotent. no issue.
**Consider accessibility/low:** pills no keyboard behavior role=tablist; set `aria-selected`, but no arrow-key navigation, and keyboard Enter triggers? Buttons default keyboard "click" on Enter/space; missing arrow keys but role tab implies arrow keys should be supported; minor a11y. skip maybe.
**Maintainability: inline style attr huge use** — system says avoid inline style attr except dynamic. Many styled spans with style attributes; CSS asset has static style but template uses inline style heavily (`style="gap:10px;..."`, etc.). Could be low. Keep optional.
Let's not create too many issues: target maybe 8-10.
Order requested from highest to lowest:
1. high: offcanvas/visualizar XSS nothing? There is mismatch plus SSR rows lacking data fields.
2. high: Stored XSS `json_encode|raw` `</script>` (HTML parse break).
3. high/medium: Adriana insights `|raw` and unescaped list items. Actually maybe consolidate as **medium** because source maybe from AI/higher service lacking untrusted text? But still any text from AI not guaranteed to be free from user echo. I'll mark medium-high? Format only severity. **medium**, but combine? I will make it separate (medium priority #3-4).
Maybe issue #3: XSS risk at insights raw — medium.
#4: html2canvas duplicated — medium? Should come after XSS of medium.
#5: duplicated logic/god file — medium.
#6: origin_url javascript scheme — low/medium; put low after medium ones? If value from server-provided known internal URL, likely low; note.
#7: JS huge + duplication plus var (Compose?). Wait god-file covers maintainability medium already.
#8: SSR row action data attributes missing (same combined #1?) maybe separate line mention as part of #1 resolution.
Let's determine tools for each:
- Issue 1 (high): tools:
→ code_search search `openOffcanvasssmaApActionView|ssmaApActionView-offcanvas-wrapper|ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas` search across repo to see definitions/inclusions.
→ code_search search `ssma-ap-action-view-title|data-ap-detail` etc for existence of expected ids (across twig)
→ file_find `action_plan_view_offcanvas` to check include sites
Reason: Because if we want to confirm mismatch and also the partial include.
- Issue 2 (high): tools:
→ code_search search `json_encode|raw` with `file_pattern templates/ssma/` whole to evaluate if all panel JSON carries potential; and inspect other scripts storage approach; existing patterns.
→ maybe search action data sources to evaluate untrusted content (action title etc from DB) — but backend not in diff; code_search for the panel service name `SsmaActionPlanPanelService|action_plan_panel_data` for source.
Could thus verify occurrence? Since backend likely symmetrical; but original suggestion would implement escaping e.g. replace `'<'` in JSON with `\u003C`. We'll describe.
- Issue 3 (medium): Search where `_action_plan_semantic_adriana` partial receives `panel.semantic`/`adriana` from ssma panel service backend in PHP; confirm insight strings re-use raw text from user fields (code_search e.g. `suggested_questions|main_insights` in PHP). Also code_search for same safety pattern to compare occurrences panel service.
- Issue 4 (medium): search `html2canvas.min.js` across templates to confirm occurrence panel uses same static include vs lazy loaders (pattern); target files list: `public/js/ssma/*action_plan_panel.js: ensureHtml2Canvas`; Remove static script from _tab_painel if lazy loader covers.
- Issue 5 (medium): code_search function names among public/js/ssma and occurrence panel file_find; identify existing sim; and grep var? For maintainability we can make code_search `buildAdrianaInsightsHtml|updateOverviewKpiRow|ensureHtml2Canvas` in js/ssma dir to find duplicates from occurrence panel.
- Issue 6 (medium) — SSR/JS: `origin_url` etc; + `javascript:` allowlist low.
Wait also another cross-JS/Twig contract broken: `_tab_painel.html.twig` KPI SSR uses `_card.html.twig` but JS `updateKpiRow` expects `.mhs-card-title/...` inside #ssma-ap-kpi-row, while CSS classes card from `_card` component? `_card` may create `.mhs-card...` class or different. Need verify `_card.html.twig` markup classes to ensure dynamic update works with SSR output and the same update logic matches — if mismatched, update broken as well. Add tool check with code_search into `templates/components/ui/_card.html.twig` to confirm class names? In `index` of `_tab_painel` include `_card` only; also class `mhs-card` reused widely CSS file '#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .mhs-card'? but HTML buildKpiCardHtml uses class mhs-card etc; fallback when SSR cards length zero builds new cards. If SSR cards exist ('cards.length') the code updates by selectors `.mhs-card-title`. If `_card.html.twig` includes those selectors yes; The CSS file includes `.mhs-card`? It includes mhs-card-related for gauges? In CSS lines .action_plan view uses. Good.
But `_tab_painel.html.twig` calls "render row update ..." When SSR list length matches filter; if filter returns `kpis` with four cards; always okay.
Whereas `updateOverviewKpiRow` creates html `buildKpiCardHtml(kpi).replace('col-xl-3', 'col-xl')` only in case cards.length is 0 — the template starts with `col-xl` cards not `col-xl-3`; CSS .col-xl custom works (actually 'col-xl' unsupported by default Bootstrap? They define CSS to make `> [class*="col-xl"]` flex ... but class col-xl exists also responsive no CSS widths). Existing design in place anyway. Skip.
Also JS has `ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas`? no.
Now think about Issue 2 details: `json_encode` includes panel could include HTML? In Twig `json_encode` encode control char `<` becomes '\u003C'? PHP json_encode does not escape `<` unless JSON_HEX_TAG. Symfony Twig's json_encode filter just returns json_encode($value) no flags. So `<script>` inside string passes through? Since input value stored in JSON string `"</script>"`. The browser's HTML parser will decode character reference attempts? Wait — JSON script text content is processed by the HTML tokenizer in `script data` state. In script data state, `</script>` closes. However, HTML entity references are not parsed inside script data. Good.
Payload scenario: user's action title `</script><script>fetch('https://evil?c='+document.cookie)</script>` stored. When the admin opens Plan Painel page, script tag escaped in main HTML? But internal JSON raw will issue exec. Yes.
Potential no issue if `row.title` in JSON truncated or sanitized by service, but can't be sure from diff: need backend. For plan medium-high; I'll set high because data may be from occurrences/inspeções; but these fields may be internal occurrence title maybe user-created too. Keep high, but describe needing backend cross-check.
Wait the SSR table (Twig render `{{ row.title }}` and cell `row.title` escaped) but the JSON includes all panel with same data that also prints; so it's likely to reproduce. So end judgment high.
Now compile final concise list.
Need final format exactly:
```
Summary: ...
Issues
1. [high] ...
→ tool args — reason
...
```
Rules in the output section: lines with `→ tool ... args ... reason`.
Write in pt-BR.
Let me decide exact severity set:
1. [high] `openActionViewOffcanvas`.
2. [high] stored XSS via JSON in `<script>` (escaping missing `<\/`).
3. [medium] XSS possibility on Adriana insights raw:
4. [medium] html2canvas loaded twice + unconditional static third-party,
5. [medium] monolithic JS/CSS duplicates.
6. [medium] SSR first render mismatch buttons + origin_url hyperlink policy javascript: maybe low; Hmm — Actually I will separate:
6. [medium] Contrato SSR/AJAX between table rows and JS build: initial SSR only data-action-id; plus the JS helper fields unresolved... Could keep stand-alone same issue #1? It's actually another branch: clicking on SSR row's button lacking data to fill => shows dashes — but because offcanvas ids are wrong, user would get empty anyway. If we fix #1 IDs, SSR button incomplete extends. Medium? Separate would be duplication of context; avoid.
6. [low] `javascript:` schemes for origin_url & no allowlist (safe because server provides full route but still caution).
Another possibly relevant **medium**: in `syncApPainelPeriodPresetUI`, periods like next_month chosen with end +30 days not calendar month; `diffDays` not an issue. Skip.
Any **data integrity / performance**: chart render loops that destroy + recreate Highcharts every filter call at 120ms debounce; filter also loads large panel data, table clear and data tables. OK.
What about **dead code**: `resetCustomSelect` never referenced and duplicated ensureHtml2Canvas branch impossible with static tag (medium can mention "the static include makes lazy branch dead" with #4). Good.
Also `_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig` includes `<style>` block maybe CSS inline each page; another reason to move to CSS asset; not needed.
Let's offer tool guidance per issue with explicit params:
Issue 1:
```
→ code_search 'openOffcanvasssmaApActionView|ssmaApActionView|ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas' com padrão regex — verificar quem define função global que abre offcanvas e qual id de modal realmente existente.
→ code_search 'ssma-ap-action-view-title|data-ap-detail' — verificar se os ids esperados existem no partial novo; se não, confirmar falha.
→ file_find 'action_plan_view_offcanvas' / templates — confirmar onde o include ocorre; se nenhum include encontrado...
```
Actually format per issue lines starts `→ code_search ... — reason` one per line. They expect no backticks necessarily.
Issue 2:
```
→ code_search 'ssma-ap-panel-config-json|json_encode|raw' in templates — comparing how existing occurrence panel embeds initial JSON (escapes `</`) to consolidate pattern or bug.
→ code_search 'SsmaActionPlanPanelService|action_plan_panel_data' — check data origin contains user input...
```
Search terms could be quoted? Provide arguments.
Issue 3:
```
→ code_search 'main_insights|suggested_questions|common_factors' path for PHP... to verify insight strings content from AI and whether can include user-echoed HTML; check production sanitization.
```
But those fields are in this diff's data keys not in php? New service may generate; codebase search probably yields JSON keys definitions. Also check `_panel_semantic_adriana_styles.html.twig`? Another approach: search insight sources with `follow_up_questions` in PHP directory.
Issue 4:
```
→ code_search 'html2canvas.min.js' across project templates - mapping current usage (only in lazy path? static tags).
```
Issue 5:
```
→ file_find 'panel.js' / 'occurrence' or code search functions duplication.
```
For JS: `code_search '(buildAdrianaInsightsHtml|updateOverviewKpiRow|renderOverviewEvolutionChart)' file patterns `public/js/ssma/` to find counterpart; confirm the whole new giant file; plan refactor.
Issue 6 low:
```
→ code_search 'origin_url' repo-wide to find where URL is built and whether trusted.
```
CSS: Maybe no explicit issue list... could include low: CSS contains many unused rules & inline duplicate. All right with issue 5 mention instead.
Let's produce summary covers new "Painel" tab action plan (plano de ação), filters, charts Highcharts, AJAX filter endpoint, export print with html2canvas, kpis semantic "Adriana" etc.
Make issues each covers three dimensions: location, nature, impact.
Issue wording pt-BR. For severity, and final output no headings '#' no fences.
Let me phrase carefully with simple Portuguese main phrase first, then technical details.
1. high: "Ao clicar em Visualizar na tabela de pendências, o offcanvas de detalhes não recebe os dados e a abertura depende de funções/ids que não batem com o template novo..." mention partial's markup and ids.
2. high: "Os dados iniciais do painel embutidos `<script type=application/json>` via `{{ panel|json_encode|raw }}` não escapam `</script>`; qualquer título/descrição com essa sequência fecha o bloco antes da hora e pode injetar HTML/script." mention fix `<\/` etc.
3. medium: "Insights da Adriana são inseridos como HTML puro... `{{ insight|raw }}` no Twig e `<li>'+item+'</li>` no JS sem escapar; como conteúdo pode ecoar campos criados por usuário (títulos etc) ⇒ XSS... confirmar backend sanitization."
4. medium: "A página carrega html2canvas da CDN duas vezes — tag fixa no `_tab_painel` e loader dinâmico no `action_plan_panel.js`; além de lógica lazy morta, ~1MB adicional a cada abertura — performance, dependency."
5. medium: "Arquivo JS 3100+ linhas e muito do painel ocorrências duplicado; nova tela replica KPI/adi/export — maintainability: extrair helper"
6. low: "URLs de origem link com href; sem allowlist de esquema capaz de produzir javascript: if record data from user; e `resetCustomSelect` não usada / etc"? Perhaps make separate low entries if distinct enough. Also CSS dead? Include single low listing perhaps:
- [low] "Código morto/estilo: `resetCustomSelect` nunca chamada; classes CSS criadas (ssma-ap-overview-semantic* etc.) sem correspondente no markup; as CSS rules inside `@container` also can't match; uso extensivo var; etc." — merging multiple low style things may be messy but acceptable? The format says each issue one description area; many small low items can be separate. But too many lines. I'll add:
6. [low] (JS var). 7. [low] dead CSS/resetCustomSelect. 8. [low] origin_url javascript scheme (maybe actually medium? no, low).
What about SSR twig issue #? Keep count around 8.
Wait but issue 1 severity high strong. What about SSR date? Fine.
Order medium ones: html2canvas (#4) before god file (#5) before XSS insights? security medium issue usually before performance same severity; order arbitrary but keep logically: #3 XSS insights then html2canvas #4 then monolithic #5. Low #6 origin URLs or as earlier? javascript scheme maybe low #6; var #7; dead-code/CSS #8.
Let's write final.
Need to include "Issues" heading line, exactly per template: after Summary line then "Issues". Good.
Keep Summary in PT-BR.
Do we mention CSS no explicit? It's within #7.
Tool examples for action packed each issue. For issue with second/third tool add new arrow line.
Now craft exact wording.
Also, note current date irrelevant.
Ensure no triple backticks.
Final answer.
Summary: Adição da aba "Painel" no módulo Plano de Ação, com três visões (Pendências, Visão Geral, Comparativo): novo CSS dedicado (action_plan_panel.css), novo JS monolítico (action_plan_panel.js) responsável por filtros, gráficos Highcharts, DataTables, insights da Adriana e exportação para PDF via html2canvas, além de novos templates Twig (abas, offcanvas de detalhes da ação, avatares de responsáveis e bloco semântico/Adriana). Inclui também o registro das novas tabs e CSS de layout no index do módulo.
Issues
1. [high] Ao clicar em "Visualizar" na tabela de pendências, o offcanvas de detalhes não consegue exibir os dados da ação selecionada: o JS preenche campos por IDs como `ssma-ap-action-view-title`, `ssma-ap-action-view-id` e `data-action-title`, mas o novo partial `_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig` define os campos com `data-ap-detail` e o modal como `ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas` — conjunto que não existe em nenhum arquivo desta PR. A abertura ainda depende de `openOffcanvasssmaApActionView()`/`#ssmaApActionView`, que não são definidos nem referenciam o id do novo componente, então o usuário verá um offcanvas vazio (ou nada) e a função principal da tabela fica quebrada. É necessário alinhar o contrato entre o JS e o markup, preenchendo os campos `data-ap-detail` do offcanvas existente e usando o id correto para abrir/fechar.
→ code_search 'openOffcanvasssmaApActionView|ssmaApActionView-offcanvas-wrapper|ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas' com use_perl_regexp: true — confirmar onde a função/ids existem e qual é o id real do offcanvas renderizado.
→ code_search 'ssma-ap-action-view-title|ssma-ap-action-view-id|data-ap-detail' com use_perl_regexp: true — verificar se os IDs esperados pelo JS existem em algum template ou se o partial novo só possui `data-ap-detail`.
→ file_find 'action_plan_view_offcanvas' — localizar onde o partial é incluído (não aparece nos templates alterados) e validar se ele sequer é renderizado na tela.
2. [high] Os dados iniciais do painel são embutidos em `<script type="application/json">` com `{{ panel|json_encode|raw }}` sem escapar a sequência `</script>`: se qualquer conteúdo gravado por usuário (título/descrição de ação, comentários, origem) contiver `</script>`, o parser de HTML encerra o bloco antes da hora e o restante pode virar markup/script executável — XSS armazenado disparado para qualquer pessoa que abra a aba Painel. É preciso sanitizar a saída do `json_encode` (ex.: substituir `<` por `\u003C` ou aplicar `JSON_HEX_TAG`) antes do `|raw`.
→ code_search 'ssma-ap-panel-config-json|json_encode.*raw' com use_perl_regexp: true — comparar com como outros módulos (ex.: painel de ocorrências) embutem JSON inicial e se já aplicam alguma proteção contra `</script>`.
→ code_search 'SsmaActionPlanPanelService|action_plan_panel_data' — verificar se os campos serializados (títulos/descrições) contêm texto digitado por usuário sem sanitização prévia.
3. [medium] Os insights da Adriana são injetados como HTML puro: no Twig o partial usa `{{ insight|raw }}` e no JS o `buildAdrianaInsightsHtml` monta `<li>' + item + '</li>` sem `escapeHtml`. Como esses textos são gerados por IA a partir de dados do painel, eles podem ecoar trechos de campos criados pelo usuário (títulos de ação, descrições) sem neutralizar tags; um conteúdo como `<img onerror>` pode executar no navegador de quem consulta o painel. O tratamento deve ser unificado: ou confiar em um formato restrito gerado pelo backend (e garantir sanitização na origem) ou escapar o texto antes de inserir no DOM.
→ code_search 'main_insights|follow_up_questions|common_factors|high_risk_factors' — localizar no backend onde essas strings são montadas e confirmar se podem conter eco de texto não sanitizado do usuário.
→ code_search 'ssma-adriana-insights|insight|raw' com file_patterns: ['templates/'] — ver se o mesmo padrão `|raw` já existe no painel de ocorrências e se há precedente de sanitização na origem.
4. [medium] A página carrega o html2canvas duas vezes e de forma desnecessariamente pesada: o `_tab_painel.html.twig` inclui o script da CDN estaticamente (script de ~1 MB baixado em toda abertura da aba), enquanto `action_plan_panel.js` já possui `ensureHtml2Canvas()` com carregamento sob demanda — o que torna esse loader praticamente morto. Além do custo de banda/renderização para todos os usuários mesmo sem exportar, introduz dependência de terceiros sem SRI e sujeita o fluxo a CSP/indisponibilidade de rede. O ideal é remover a tag estática e manter apenas o lazy-load, ou condicionar o carregamento à existência do botão de exportação.
→ code_search 'html2canvas.min.js' — mapear todas as inclusões do html2canvas no projeto e ver qual padrão já é usado nos demais painéis (estático vs. lazy).
5. [medium] O JS novo tem ~3.150 linhas e o CSS ~1.250 linhas, replicando bastante da lógica já existente no painel de ocorrências (renderização de KPIs, bloco Adriana, resumo operacional, exportação de gráficos) com variações pequenas — por exemplo `updateKpiRow` e `updateOverviewKpiRow` são quase idênticos. Isso dificulta manutenção e aumenta o risco de correções divergirem entre telas; o recomendado é extrair os comportamentos comuns (KPI, insights/Adriana, captura/print, período/presets) para helpers compartilhados em `public/js/ssma/` e reduzir o tamanho dos arquivos novos.
→ file_find 'panel' com case_sensitive: false — identificar os JS/CSS de painéis existentes (ocorrências etc.) que já implementam o mesmo padrão.
→ code_search 'buildAdrianaInsightsHtml|updateKpiRow|ensureHtml2Canvas|refreshApPeriodPresetState' com file_patterns: ['public/js/ssma/'] — confirmar duplicação de funções entre o novo arquivo e os scripts já existentes.
6. [low] O link "Ir para origem" montado no JS (`buildPendenciasTableRowHtml`) injeta `href` com qualquer conteúdo vindo de `origin_url`, sem allowlist de esquema (`https`, `http`): `escapeHtml` não neutraliza `javascript:` e, se o valor for influenciado por dados de origem cadastrados por usuário, um clique pode executar script. Vale validar a origem do dado no backend e, no cliente, aceitar apenas URL http(s) relativa antes de montar o atributo.
→ code_search 'origin_url' — localizar no backend onde essa URL é construída e confirmar se é sempre rota interna ou se pode conter dado externo/usuário.
7. [low] Todo o JS novo usa `var` em vez de `let`/`const`, contrariando o padrão obrigatório do repositório; por ser estilo sem efeito funcional imediato, deve ser ajustado em uma limpeza futura (ou alinhado com o padrão já adotado nos scripts legados do SSMA antes de crescer o arquivo).
→ code_search '^\s*var ' com file_patterns: ['public/js/ssma/*.js'] e use_perl_regexp: true — medir a recorrência do padrão `var` nos scripts do módulo e decidir a convenção.
8. [low] Há código/estilos mortos ou sem efeito no conjunto novo: `resetCustomSelect` é definida no JS e nunca chamada; o CSS cria classes como `ssma-ap-overview-semantic-*` e regras dentro de `@container ap-ia-inner` que não encontram os elementos correspondentes no markup renderizado (`ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns/item` não existem nos templates novos); o conteúdo fica órfão e aumenta o custo de manutenção. Recomenda-se remover ou vincular essas regras aos elementos reais.
→ code_search 'resetCustomSelect\(' com file_patterns: ['public/js/', 'templates/'] — confirmar que a função não possui nenhum chamador no projeto.
→ code_search 'ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns|ssma-ap-overview-semantic-item' com file_patterns: ['templates/', 'public/css/'] — verificar se o markup correspondente existe ou se as regras CSS são apenas resíduo.
main_task
Request #1
deepseek-v4-flash
P:70.37K C:348 CR:2.69K CW:0
4418ms
Reasoning
Let me analyze this review task. This is about a PR that adds a new "Painel" (Dashboard) tab to the Plano de Ação module in SSMA. Let me review the files carefully.
The review plan identifies several issues to investigate:
1. Offcanvas contract mismatch between JS and template
2. JSON embedded data XSS risk with `</script>` escaping
3. Adriana insights injected as raw HTML
4. html2canvas loaded twice
5. Large monolithic JS/CSS files duplicating logic
6. `origin_url` href injection
7. Use of `var` instead of let/const
8. Dead code
Let me start by searching for context to confirm these issues.
Let me search for the relevant patterns.
Tool Calls (3)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "openOffcanvasssmaApActionView|ssmaApActionView-offcanvas-wrapper|ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas|ssma-ap-action-view-title", "use_perl_regexp": true}
Result
File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js
Match lines: 4
3005| setText('ssma-ap-action-view-title', title);
3024| if (typeof window.openOffcanvasssmaApActionView === 'function') {
3025| window.openOffcanvasssmaApActionView();
3028| var canvas = document.getElementById('ssmaApActionView-offcanvas-wrapper')
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig
Match lines: 8
2| modal_id: 'ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas',
11| <div class="ssma-ap-action-details" id="ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvasBody">
104| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel ml-auto" data-dismiss-offcanvas="ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas">Fechar</button>
109|#ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas-offcanvas-wrapper .offcanvas-header {
114|#ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas-offcanvas-wrapper .offcanvas-header .offcanvas-title {
121|#ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas-offcanvas-wrapper .offcanvas-header .offcanvas-close {
126|#ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas-offcanvas-wrapper .offcanvas-body {
130|#ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas-offcanvas-wrapper .offcanvas-footer {
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "data-ap-detail", "use_perl_regexp": true}
Result
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig Match lines: 17 17| <span class="ssma-ap-action-details-value" data-ap-detail="title">—</span> 21| <span class="ssma-ap-action-details-value" data-ap-detail="code">—</span> 25| <span class="ssma-ap-action-details-value" data-ap-detail="type_label">—</span> 29| <span class="ssma-ap-action-details-value" data-ap-detail="occurrence_type_label">—</span> 33| <span class="ssma-ap-action-details-value ssma-ap-action-details-value--muted" data-ap-detail="description">—</span> 43| <span class="ssma-ap-action-details-value" data-ap-detail="executor_name">—</span> 47| <span class="ssma-ap-action-details-value" data-ap-detail="validator_name">—</span> 51| <span class="ssma-ap-action-details-value" data-ap-detail="deadline_label">—</span> 55| <span class="ssma-ap-action-details-value" data-ap-detail="deadline_status">—</span> 59| <span class="ssma-ap-action-details-value" data-ap-detail="validation_status_label">—</span> 63| <span class="ssma-ap-action-details-value" data-ap-detail="solved_label">—</span> 73| <span class="ssma-ap-action-details-value" data-ap-detail="project_name">—</span> 77| <span class="ssma-ap-action-details-value" data-ap-detail="actions_taken_label">—</span> 81| <span class="ssma-ap-action-details-value ssma-ap-action-details-value--muted" data-ap-detail="occurrence_title">—</span> 85| <span class="ssma-ap-action-details-value" data-ap-detail="control_hierarchy">—</span> 89| <span class="ssma-ap-action-details-value" data-ap-detail="project_priority">—</span> 96| <div class="ssma-ap-action-details-history" data-ap-detail="history">
file_find
Show Details
Arguments
{"query_name": "action_plan_view_offcanvas"}
Result
templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig
Request #2
deepseek-v4-flash
P:71.59K C:521 CR:70.66K CW:0
4286ms
Reasoning
So I've confirmed:
- JS `openActionViewOffcanvas` fills `ssma-ap-action-view-title`, `ssma-ap-action-view-id`, etc., but the partial `_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig` defines fields with `data-ap-detail` attributes and uses `ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas` modal id.
- The JS looks for `openOffcanvasssmaApActionView`, `ssmaApActionView-offcanvas-wrapper`, `#ssmaApActionView`.
But is the partial actually rendered anywhere? Let me find where the partial is included. The file_find only found the file itself, not an include. Let me search for include of the partial, and where offcanvas might be used. Also, need to find whether any of the JS code sets values by data-ap-detail. Let me search for where `openActionViewOffcanvas` / `bindTableViewButtons` populates, and if there is any JS that fills `data-ap-detail`.
Also, the buttons in the table built via JS (`buildPendenciasTableRowHtml`) set `data-action-*` attributes; and `openActionViewOffcanvas` reads them and then sets text on `ssma-ap-action-view-*`. But the twig offcanvas uses `data-ap-detail`. So the contract mismatch: either the partial is not rendered (in which case clicking Visualizar does nothing if the wrapper canvas isn't found) OR the offcanvas exists but remains unfilled.
Let me search for whether the offcanvas partial is included anywhere in the templates.
Tool Calls (3)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "_action_plan_view_offcanvas|_action_plan_responsible_icons|ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas", "use_perl_regexp": true}
Result
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig
Match lines: 8
2| modal_id: 'ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas',
11| <div class="ssma-ap-action-details" id="ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvasBody">
104| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-cancel ml-auto" data-dismiss-offcanvas="ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas">Fechar</button>
109|#ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas-offcanvas-wrapper .offcanvas-header {
114|#ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas-offcanvas-wrapper .offcanvas-header .offcanvas-title {
121|#ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas-offcanvas-wrapper .offcanvas-header .offcanvas-close {
126|#ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas-offcanvas-wrapper .offcanvas-body {
130|#ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas-offcanvas-wrapper .offcanvas-footer {
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "ssma-ap-panel-config-json|ssma-ap-panel-data-json", "use_perl_regexp": true}
Result
File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js
Match lines: 3
57| var el = document.getElementById('ssma-ap-panel-config-json');
496| var jsonEl = document.getElementById('ssma-ap-panel-data-json');
1108| var el = document.getElementById('ssma-ap-panel-data-json');
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel.html.twig
Match lines: 2
300| <script type="application/json" id="ssma-ap-panel-config-json">{{ {
306| <script type="application/json" id="ssma-ap-panel-data-json">{{ panel|json_encode|raw }}</script>
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "html2canvas"}
Result
Note: The results have been truncated. Only showing first 100 results.
File: package-lock.json
Match lines: 4
13| "@types/html2canvas": "^0.5.35",
18| "html2canvas": "^1.4.1",
2782| "node_modules/@types/html2canvas": {
7078| "node_modules/html2canvas": {
File: package.json
Match lines: 2
55| "@types/html2canvas": "^0.5.35",
60| "html2canvas": "^1.4.1",
File: public/js/people-analytics/export-pdf.js
Match lines: 3
9| * - html2canvas (captura de tela)
228| const canvas = await html2canvas(moduleElement, {
472| const canvas = await html2canvas(wrapper, {
File: public/js/recommendations-network-ported/html2canvas.js
Match lines: 46
2| html2canvas 0.5.0-alpha1 <http://html2canvas.hertzen.com>
34| (window || module.exports).html2canvas = function() {
569|var html2canvasNodeAttribute = "data-html2canvas-node";
570|var html2canvasCanvasCloneAttribute = "data-html2canvas-canvas-clone";
571|var html2canvasCanvasCloneIndex = 0;
572|var html2canvasCloneIndex = 0;
574|window.html2canvas = function(nodeList, options) {
575| var index = html2canvasCloneIndex++;
578| window.html2canvas.logging = true;
579| window.html2canvas.start = Date.now();
602| node.setAttribute(html2canvasNodeAttribute + index, index);
605| log("options.onrendered is deprecated, html2canvas returns a Promise containing the canvas");
612|window.html2canvas.punycode = this.punycode;
613|window.html2canvas.proxy = {};
615|function renderDocument(document, options, windowWidth, windowHeight, html2canvasIndex) {
618| var attributeName = html2canvasNodeAttribute + html2canvasIndex;
619| var selector = "[" + attributeName + "='" + html2canvasIndex + "']";
701|// https://github.com/niklasvh/html2canvas/issues/503
721| container.className = "html2canvas-container";
816| canvas.setAttribute(html2canvasCanvasCloneAttribute, "canvas-" + html2canvasCanvasCloneIndex++);
821| [].slice.call(ownerDocument.querySelectorAll("[" + html2canvasCanvasCloneAttribute + "]"), 0).forEach(function(canvas) {
823| var clonedCanvas = documentClone.querySelector('[' + html2canvasCanvasCloneAttribute + '="' + canvas.getAttribute(html2canvasCanvasCloneAttribute) + '"]');
832| canvas.removeAttribute(html2canvasCanvasCloneAttribute);
1221| return html2canvas(container.contentWindow.document.documentElement, {type: 'view', width: container.width, height: container.height, proxy: options.proxy, javascriptEnabled: options.javascriptEnabled, removeContainer: options.removeContainer, allowTaint: options.allowTaint, imageTimeout: options.imageTimeout / 2});
1486| if (window.html2canvas.logging && window.console && window.console.log) {
1487| Function.prototype.bind.call(window.console.log, (window.console)).apply(window.console, [(Date.now() - window.html2canvas.start) + "ms", "html2canvas:"].concat([].slice.call(arguments, 0)));
1536| !this.node.hasAttribute("data-html2canvas-ignore") &&
2049| var pseudoNode = document.createElement(isImage ? 'img' : 'html2canvaspseudoelement');
2130| var wrapper = node.ownerDocument.createElement('html2canvaswrapper');
2293| var wrapper = document.createElement('html2canvaswrapper');
2304| log("html2canvas: Parse: Exception caught in renderFormValue: " + e.message);
2320| var characters = window.html2canvas.punycode.ucs2.decode(container.node.data);
2322| return window.html2canvas.punycode.ucs2.encode([character]);
2728| words.push(window.html2canvas.punycode.ucs2.encode(word));
2739| words.push(window.html2canvas.punycode.ucs2.encode(word));
2788| delete window.html2canvas.proxy[callback];
2791| window.html2canvas.proxy[callback] = function(response) {
2805| return !useCORS ? "html2canvas_" + Date.now() + "_" + (++proxyCount) + "_" + Math.round(Math.random() * 100000) : "";
2809| return proxyUrl + "?url=" + encodeURIComponent(src) + (callback.length ? "&callback=html2canvas.proxy." + callback : "");
2863|PseudoElementContainer.prototype.PSEUDO_HIDE_ELEMENT_CLASS_BEFORE = "___html2canvas___pseudoelement_before";
2864|PseudoElementContainer.prototype.PSEUDO_HIDE_ELEMENT_CLASS_AFTER = "___html2canvas___pseudoelement_after";
3045| html2canvas.fabric.loadSVGFromString(svg, self.createCanvas.call(self, resolve));
3051| return !html2canvas.fabric ? Promise.reject(new Error("html2canvas.svg.js is not loaded, cannot render svg")) : Promise.resolve();
3069| var canvas = new html2canvas.fabric.StaticCanvas('c');
3074| .add(html2canvas.fabric.util.groupSVGElements(objects, options))
3134| html2canvas.fabric.parseSVGDocument(node, self.createCanvas.call(self, resolve));
File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js
Match lines: 11
1938| function ensureHtml2Canvas() {
1940| if (typeof window.html2canvas === 'function') {
1945| var existing = document.getElementById('ssma-ap-panel-html2canvas-loader');
1947| existing.addEventListener('load', function () { resolve(typeof window.html2canvas === 'function'); });
1953| script.id = 'ssma-ap-panel-html2canvas-loader';
1954| script.src = 'https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/html2canvas/1.4.1/html2canvas.min.js';
1955| script.onload = function () { resolve(typeof window.html2canvas === 'function'); };
1963| if (!element || typeof window.html2canvas !== 'function') {
1968| window.html2canvas(element, {
2406| var hasHtml2Canvas = await ensureHtml2Canvas();
2407| if (!hasHtml2Canvas) {
File: templates/candidate/training_tasks.html.twig
Match lines: 11
878|<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/html2canvas/1.4.1/html2canvas.min.js"></script>
914|// bgUrl: data URL pré-convertido do fundo (garante resolução máxima no html2canvas)
938|// html2canvas renderiza data URLs em resolução máxima sem fazer
960|// Pré-converte o fundo para data URL antes de chamar html2canvas.
2372|html2canvas(aiOverlay, {
2414|// Gerar overlay para todos os certificados (IA e normais) com html2canvas
2426|html2canvas(aiOverlayDirect, {
3973|// Check if html2canvas is available
3974|if (typeof html2canvas === 'undefined') {
4044|convertCertificateToPNG: function (certificateElement, moduleTitle, iframe) { // Use html2canvas to convert certificate to image
4045|html2canvas(certificateElement, {
File: templates/company/_member_analytics_tab.html.twig
Match lines: 1
246|<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/html2canvas/1.4.1/html2canvas.min.js"></script>
File: templates/file_management/partials/_newText.html.twig
Match lines: 4
6| <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/html2canvas@1.4.1/dist/html2canvas.min.js"></script>
16| 'html2canvas': typeof html2canvas !== 'undefined',
807| /* ---- PDF (jsPDF.html + html2canvas) ---- */
892| const canvas = await html2canvas(wrapper, {
File: templates/organograma/company_layout.html.twig
Match lines: 14
7127| console.warn('⚠️ Erro ao carregar dom-to-image, tentando html2canvas...');
7128| this.captureWithHtml2Canvas(id, container, isSimulation);
7375| console.warn('⚠️ Erro com dom-to-image, tentando html2canvas:', error);
7376| this.captureWithHtml2Canvas(id, container, isSimulation);
7409| // Fallback using html2canvas
7410| captureWithHtml2Canvas(id, container, isSimulation = true) {
7411| if (typeof html2canvas === 'undefined') {
7413| script.src = 'https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/html2canvas@1.4.1/dist/html2canvas.min.js';
7414| script.onload = () => this.doHtml2CanvasCapture(id, container, isSimulation);
7417| this.doHtml2CanvasCapture(id, container, isSimulation);
7421| doHtml2CanvasCapture(id, container, isSimulation = true) {
7424| console.warn('⚠️ SVG não encontrado para html2canvas');
7470| html2canvas(container, {
7514| console.warn('⚠️ Erro ao capturar com html2canvas:', error);
File: templates/people_analytics/chart_detail.html.twig
Match lines: 1
228|<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/html2canvas/1.4.1/html2canvas.min.js"></script>
File: templates/people_analytics/engagement_dashboard.html.twig
Match lines: 1
374|<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/html2canvas/1.4.1/html2canvas.min.js"></script>
File: templates/people_analytics/index.html.twig
Match lines: 1
179|<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/html2canvas/1.4.1/html2canvas.min.js"></script>
File: templates/people_analytics/module_detail.html.twig
Match lines: 1
338|<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/html2canvas/1.4.1/html2canvas.min.js"></script>
File: templates/recommendationsNetwork/add_peers.html.twig
Match lines: 1
193|<script src="{{ asset('js/recommendations-network-ported/html2canvas.js') }}"></script>
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel.html.twig
Match lines: 1
594|<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/html2canvas/1.4.1/html2canvas.min.js"></script>
File: templates/templates/chat_ia_modal.html.twig
Match lines: 1
9|<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/html2canvas/1.4.1/html2canvas.min.js"></script>
File: templates/templates/salary_panel_general_view.html.twig
Match lines: 2
5|<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/html2canvas/1.4.1/html2canvas.min.js"></script>
1883| const canvas = await html2canvas($chart[0], {
File: templates/templates/salary_panel_role_simulation.html.twig
Match lines: 3
4|<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/html2canvas/1.4.1/html2canvas.min.js"></script>
1011| // Configurar html2canvas
1014| html2canvas(element, {
File: templates/time-management/ui/dashboard-detail/partials/ExportDashboard.tsx
Match lines: 3
1|import html2canvas from "html2canvas";
51| // Capturar screenshot usando html2canvas
54| const canvas = await html2canvas(dashboardRef.current!, {
File: templates/training/certificate_download.html.twig
Match lines: 4
405| <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/html2canvas/1.4.1/html2canvas.min.js"></script>
413|if (htmlContent && imageElement && previewElement && typeof html2canvas !== 'undefined') {
421|html2canvas(previewElement, {
447|} else if (htmlContent) { // Fallback se html2canvas não estiver disponível
File: templates/training/training_certificados_form.html.twig
Match lines: 2
974| <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/html2canvas/1.4.1/html2canvas.min.js"></script>
2627|html2canvas(previewElement, {
File: yarn.lock
Match lines: 2
1448|"@types/html2canvas@^0.5.35":
3888|html2canvas@^1.4.1:
Request #3
deepseek-v4-flash
P:75.49K C:4.04K CR:72.06K CW:0
30371ms
Reasoning
Key findings:
1. The offcanvas partial `_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig` isn't included anywhere in the PR templates. It defines `data-ap-detail` fields. JS expects `ssma-ap-action-view-*` IDs and open functions that don't exist. This is a genuine contract mismatch issue (or the offcanvas isn't rendered at all). Let me verify by searching where the partial might be included, maybe in `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` (not in review files but I can search). Search result only found file itself for `_action_plan_view_offcanvas`. Let me search again more broadly for "view_offcanvas" includes or `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` content.
Actually the code_search for `_action_plan_view_offcanvas|_action_plan_responsible_icons|ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas` matched only within the partial file itself. This means the partial is never included in any template in the current repo. That strongly suggests this PR adds partial files that are not wired up - meaning the "Visualizar" offcanvas doesn't appear at all, OR it is included in another file not yet in the branch. But careful: code_search may search the whole repo. Since the partial isn't included anywhere, clicking "Visualizar" invokes openActionViewOffcanvas → fills IDs (none exist) → tries window.openOffcanvasssmaApActionView (doesn't exist) → falls to #ssmaApActionView-offcanvas-wrapper or #ssmaApActionViewOffcanvas (don't exist in DOM unless the embed is included). So nothing happens. This is a real functional bug worth flagging (medium/high).
However, I must be careful about scope: the review plan states issue #1 in detail. I've confirmed the mismatch. Let me now check where the twig offcanvas should be included - maybe in the tabs/_tab_action_plan.html.twig file (not modified in this PR, but existing). Let me search for include of the partial file by name.
Search already: code_search across the repo returned only matches inside the partial itself. So it's not included anywhere. And also the JS sets values for IDs `ssma-ap-action-view-title` etc. while the twig uses `data-ap-detail`. Even if the twig were included somewhere, the JS would need to set `data-ap-detail` fields.
Wait — but maybe `openActionViewOffcanvas` is an older function for another purpose that already exists elsewhere, and the twig partial is used by another JS that reads `data-ap-detail` from `row.action-details` etc. Let me search for `data-ap-detail` in JS files, and for JS that queries `data-ap-detail`.
Let me also check `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` content for the "Visualizar" button handler and whether an offcanvas is already being included elsewhere (maybe partials included in the existing tab). Let me find that file.
2. html2canvas loading: static in _tab_painel.html.twig AND lazy loader in JS. Confirmed. The static include is at line 594 of _tab_painel. This loads 1MB on every page open. Other templates in repo do static include too (people_analytics etc.), but the pattern in this new JS already provides ensureHtml2Canvas lazy load, which becomes redundant since the script is already loaded. That's dead code plus redundant band. Medium/low.
3. JSON embedded `{{ panel|json_encode|raw }}`. Let's examine the data. It's `panel` which includes rows of table (titles from user) and semantic content etc. JSON encode by default in Twig: Twig's json_encode filter does not escape `<`, `>`, `&` unless `JSON_HEX_TAG` etc. Actually Twig json_encode by default uses `json_encode` with `JSON_HEX_TAG|JSON_HEX_APOS|JSON_HEX_AMP|JSON_HEX_QUOT`? Let me recall. In Twig, the `json_encode` filter applies `JSON_HEX_TAG` by default? Actually Twig's json_encode filter historically had options `constant('JSON_HEX_TAG')`? Hmm. Let me recall Twig source: In Twig's core extension, `json_encode` filter: `twig_jsonencode_filter($value, $options = 0)` where the default options... In `Twig\Extension\CoreExtension::jsonEncode`, when called as filter, default options = 0. Actually the filter signature is `json_encode(value, options = 0)`. So `<` is not escaped by default in Twig filter? But wait, `|raw` after json_encode ensures the output is not HTML-escaped. But does json_encode produce `</script>` as literal? Yes: `json_encode('</script>')` returns `"<\/script>"`? No, JSON encode escapes forward slash? PHP's json_encode by default does NOT escape `/`. So `</script>` would appear literally inside a JSON string, breaking out of the script block. Actually PHP json_encode escapes `/` only with JSON_UNESCAPED_SLASHES not set? No wait: PHP json_encode by default DOES escape forward slashes? Let me recall: In PHP, json_encode does NOT escape forward slashes by default. Actually it does escape them? There is `JSON_UNESCAPED_SLASHES` option to NOT escape slashes, meaning by default slashes ARE escaped as `\/`. Yes! PHP's json_encode escapes forward slashes by default: `<` becomes `<` (not escaped), but `/` becomes `\/`. So `</script>` becomes `<\/script>` which is safe within a script tag because there's no `</script>` sequence. Wait, but the danger is also `<!--` sequences etc. But the main breakout vector `</script>` would be neutralized by the slash escaping. Hmm.
But wait, Twig filter json_encode: does Twig add default options? Twig's json_encode filter uses `json_encode($value, $options)`. Twig filter default is `$options = 0`? Let me check Twig docs: `{{ data|json_encode }}` encodes; you can pass `json_encode(constant('JSON_HEX_TAG'))`. There is no auto HEX_TAG default... Actually in Symfony's Twig bridge? Hmm. But regardless, PHP's default json_encode escapes `/` as `\/` because JSON_UNESCAPED_SLASHES is not set. So `</script>` → `<\/script>`. Therefore it's mostly safe, though HTML spec: In a script element, the content ends at `</script` sequence case-insensitively. With slash escaped to `\/`, the sequence `</script` doesn't occur. So this isn't a genuine XSS vector per PHP behavior... BUT let's double-check: PHP json_encode by default: does it escape forward slashes? Yes, since PHP 5.4, forward slashes are escaped by default unless JSON_UNESCAPED_SLASHES is passed. So Twig json_encode would escape them. Actually wait — I need to double check. I believe PHP's default json_encode does escape `/` → `\/`. Let me confirm with known examples: json_encode('http://example.com') returns "http:\/\/example.com". Yes, that's correct, by default forward slashes are escaped.
So issue #2 in the review plan may be a false positive in terms of actual XSS, since `</script>` gets escaped by PHP default json_encode. But is there any other breakout? A `<script>` element's content ends only at the literal string `</script`. Since `/` is escaped, that sequence cannot appear. Also `<!--` can cause issues in legacy parsers; but escaping of `<`? `<` is not escaped, so `<!--` would appear. Actually with `<!--` inside a script JSON, that can trigger "script data double escaped" state parsing which could cause HTML parser to treat things weirdly. But the standard recommendation is to use JSON_HEX_TAG anyway. Hmm.
Actually wait — I should double check Twig's json_encode implementation. In Twig 3, filter json_encode signature: `twig_jsonencode_filter($value, $options = 0)`? Let me recall `Twig\Extension\CoreExtension::encodeJson` returns `json_encode($value, $options)`. The default options in Twig when calling the filter... In some versions, Twig applies `JSON_HEX_TAG | JSON_HEX_APOS | JSON_HEX_AMP | JSON_HEX_QUOT` when embedding into HTML? No.
Actually the review plan explicitly asks to compare with how other modules embed JSON. But there's risk this is a false positive. Let me verify whether similar json data blocks exist elsewhere, e.g., in the occurrence panel templates, to compare patterns. But given PHP default json_encode escapes `/`, the actual XSS risk is low. However, many projects still follow the standard of applying `|json_encode|raw` with hex. Since this is "other changed files" not in review; focus.
Let me be careful: Not 100% sure PHP json_encode escapes `/`. Let me verify. Yes: "json_encode ... Forward slash characters are escaped by default as `\/` unless JSON_UNESCAPED_SLASHES is specified." That is correct in PHP docs. So the `</script>` can't appear. So issue #2's specific claim is probably wrong. But wait, Twig filter may be called via the same json_encode but Symfony's Twig json_encode filter could use different options.
Hmm, but let me not spend too long. The key user rule: only comment on actual confirmed issues; don't over-report false positives. Let me examine other things.
Let me focus on more concretely verifiable issues:
A. Offcanvas mismatch confirmed: JS uses `openActionViewOffcanvas` but targets IDs `ssma-ap-action-view-*` and open functions that don't exist; the new twig offcanvas partial uses data-ap-detail and is not included anywhere in the PR. That is a real functional break, so "Visualizar" button doesn't work. I need to confirm where the JS's bound view action open flows: `bindTableViewButtons` binds to `.js-ssma-ap-panel-view-action`, calling `openActionViewOffcanvas(btn)`. It reads data-action-title from the button. In the server-side rendered table in `_tab_painel.html.twig`, the buttons include `data-action-id` only (not data-action-title etc.). In the JS re-render path, the row includes all data-action-*. Either way, openActionViewOffcanvas sets text on `ssma-ap-action-view-title`, which don't exist in DOM (since offcanvas partial not rendered). So click results in no visual feedback unless canvas fallback exists elsewhere. So indeed broken. I'll flag high.
Wait, but maybe this partial is included in `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` somewhere via other file names? Let me search includes of any action_plan partial. Actually the code_search already covered whole repo for `_action_plan_view_offcanvas` string — only matched within file itself. So not included. Confirmed.
B. The `escapeHtml` on row's buildPendenciasTableRowHtml escapes the `data-action-description` attribute etc. Fine.
C. Data URL origin `href`: The JS builds `<a class="... action-btn" href="...">` with `escapeHtml(originUrl)`. escapeHtml escapes quotes so attribute closed; javascript: scheme still possible but origin_url is presumably generated server-side as internal route. Let me check origin_url in the backend? We don't have backend file in the repo? Possibly PHP. Let me search where the panel data is built: SsmaActionPlanPanelService. code_search 'origin_url'.
D. `|raw` for insights. Search for insight raw in other templates — need context.
E. The duplicate html2canvas: The lazy loader exists but static tag included. Both happen: static include downloads library regardless; when user clicks export, ensureHtml2Canvas resolves immediately (already defined). It's redundant — the lazy path dead. It's low priority performance/code quality. But the static include is standard in the codebase (many templates include statically). Actually given project conventions have static include in many templates, maybe not a big issue. But within this PR, both approaches together are redundant. I'll flag low/medium: remove static tag to keep lazy, or remove lazy loader.
F. Massive monolithic file: 3153 lines JS — new file entirely. The user-specific rules for the JS say big new files duplicating logic across modules should be flagged. I can comment as maintainability, pointing to duplicate patterns with occurrence panel (e.g., updateKpiRow vs updateOverviewKpiRow in same file are near-identical - duplicate within file). That's a strong objective comment.
G. `var` usage: The rule "Using var is strictly prohibited; use let or const". New JS file uses `var` everywhere. But note this is an IIFE `(function(window, document) { ... })` style with var; many legacy scripts use var. Since the file is brand-new and there is an explicit rule, but style-only with low priority. The user rules: style findings without real effect should be short and low priority. Might comment low.
H. Dead code: `resetCustomSelect` defined and never used; confirm. Let me search for calls.
I. XSS through innerHTML with unescaped: In `buildPendenciasTableRowHtml`, row.title escaped. OK. In `buildAdrianaInsightsHtml`, item raw not escaped — those come from server semantic insights text; if server-generated from AI/user data, could contain HTML. In twig partial also `{{ insight|raw }}`. Both places share this. Need to check what insights contain and if they're generated by AI with plain text or user content. Let me check backend.
J. JS `mergePanelData` writes to `jsonEl.textContent` (safe). But in applyFilterResponse -> ... fine.
K. `escapeHtml` doesn't escape single quotes — but attributes use double quotes, so fine. In text contexts, fine.
L. The twig: `{{ row.title }}` etc. In `_tab_painel.html.twig`, table rows are constructed with `{{ row.title }}` without escaping — Twig auto-escapes by default. Fine.
M. `priority_pill` `data-action-description="' . escapeHtml(row.description || '') . '"` OK.
N. `title` attribute: `originBtn` `<a ... href="...' . escapeHtml(originUrl) . '"` fine for attribute break but not scheme. Since these origin URLs presumably constructed by backend as internal routes. Search backend quickly.
O. `buildKpiCardHtml` uses escapeHtml on values. OK.
P. Note in `_tab_painel.html.twig`, the view buttons are defined with `data-action-id` only, lacking other data; but the JS re-renders table rows with full data; but initial SSR buttons won't have all attributes. Then clicking 'Visualizar' opens offcanvas and reads attributes → fallback defaults '—'. Anyway offcanvas broken regardless.
Also, in `_tab_painel.html.twig` static SSR table building loops over panel_table rows and includes data-action-id only — missing title etc. Even after fixing offcanvas, the SSR buttons lack attributes. That's another alignment issue, but depends on offcanvas fix.
Q. Check twig index.html: uses `defaultPlanoTab`, includes _tab_painel. Note the index registers the offcanvas partial? Let me look at _tab_action_plan.html.twig file (existing) to see whether maybe offcanvas include missing there. Since not included anywhere, likely broken. Let me quickly find `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` includes.
Let me search includes of 'action_plan/partials' across templates.
R. Also confirm the JS functions referenced but possibly undefined by external: `window.initAllCustomSelectWrappers`, `setCustomSelectValue`, `MetahumanDataTables`, `window.initSsmaActionPlanCharts`, `refreshSsmaActionPlanCharts`, `ssmaAskAdrianaPanelQuestion`, `window.openOffcanvasssmaApActionView`. Some exist from other files (e.g., occurrence panel). But action plan ones like `initSsmaActionPlanCharts` presumably defined elsewhere (other changed files). We can't confirm; but at least openOffcanvasssmaApActionView not in repo.
S. Regarding 'real user input escaping for JSON script tag', confirm PHP behavior—well if it's a Symfony/Twig project in PHP, and default json_encode escapes slashes, then it's safe-ish but still recommend JSON_HEX_TAG. I might downgrade to low or drop. Let me inspect other twig files in SSMA/occurrence panel to compare pattern.
T. Another potential issue: In `_tab_painel.html.twig` there is `{% include 'components/ui/_card.html.twig' with _kpi_card only %}`; with `only` keyword - requires variables passed? 'only' means not inherit context; _kpi_card contains only these keys. Fine.
U. Accessibility: minor; skip.
Let me now check a few things in code search to firm up:
1. Search for `resetCustomSelect\(` calls.
2. Search `insight|raw` usage in templates and backend building main_insights (maybe PHP).
3. Search 'origin_url' backend.
4. Search '_tab_action_plan.html.twig' partial includes; search `partials/action_plan` includes etc.
5. Search for `initSsmaActionPlanCharts` definitions.
Let me batch these searches.
Tool Calls (4)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "resetCustomSelect\\("}
Result
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "origin_url"}
Result
File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js Match lines: 1 897| var originUrl = row.origin_url || '';
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "ssma/action_plan/partials|action_plan_view_offcanvas", "use_perl_regexp": true}
Result
File: .opencodereview/rules/ssma/action-plan-panel.md
Match lines: 1
12|- `templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_table.html.twig`
File: docs/INTEGRACAO-SSMA-CC-FELIPE.md
Match lines: 2
171|| `templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_table.html.twig` | Badges de status (`pending_validation`, `approved`, `rejected`) e link para demanda CC quando houver `cc_demand_id`. |
223|| `templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_table.html.twig` | Alterado |
File: docs/SSMA-CC-CORRECOES-IMPLEMENTADAS.md
Match lines: 2
145|**`templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_table.html.twig`**
219|| `templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_table.html.twig` | Item "Ler justificativa" no dropdown |
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_table.html.twig
Match lines: 2
140| {% include 'ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_overflow_menu.html.twig' with {
296| {% include 'ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_overflow_menu.html.twig' with {
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_action_plan.html.twig
Match lines: 1
245| {% include 'ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_table.html.twig' with {
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel.html.twig
Match lines: 1
574| {% include 'ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig' with {
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig
Match lines: 1
211| {% include 'ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig' with {
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "initSsmaActionPlanCharts|refreshSsmaActionPlanCharts", "use_perl_regexp": true}
Result
File: .opencodereview/rules/ssma/action-plan-panel.md
Match lines: 1
73|- `initSsmaActionPlanCharts` / `reflowSsmaActionPlanCharts` (definidos em `_tab_action_plan.html.twig`, expostos em `window`) só rodam quando os containers existem no DOM (`hasSsmaActionPlanDistributionCharts`). Em `action_plan_panel.js`, `initDistributionCharts`/`reflowDistributionCharts` chamam esses helpers ao renderizar/redimensionar a visão Pendências.
File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js
Match lines: 4
1781| if (typeof window.initSsmaActionPlanCharts === 'function') {
1782| window.initSsmaActionPlanCharts();
1797| if (needsRefresh && typeof window.refreshSsmaActionPlanCharts === 'function') {
1798| window.refreshSsmaActionPlanCharts();
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_action_plan.html.twig
Match lines: 5
667| function initSsmaActionPlanCharts() {
702| function refreshSsmaActionPlanCharts() {
822| refreshSsmaActionPlanCharts();
950| initSsmaActionPlanCharts();
956| setTimeout(initSsmaActionPlanCharts, 80);
Request #4
deepseek-v4-flash
P:80.42K C:505 CR:79.49K CW:0
4335ms
Reasoning
Interesting: there's a `.opencodereview/rules/ssma/action-plan-panel.md` file documenting rules. It references `_action_plan_table.html.twig`, `initSsmaActionPlanCharts` etc. Let me read this rules doc for context — it may confirm intended behavior. Also, the review plan says the rules file is part of the changes. Let me read it.
But first, key confirmations:
- `resetCustomSelect` never called anywhere → dead code (low).
- `origin_url` only appears in JS; backend not in this repo search? It's likely built by a PHP service. Not in search results, meaning origin_url built in controller/service not yet found. Search in PHP files maybe. But regardless, low issue. Let me not over-report.
- The offcanvas partial `_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig` is not included anywhere (not in _tab_action_plan nor _tab_painel). So the "Visualizar" details offcanvas does not render at all. That is a real functional issue.
Let me read the rules doc file `.opencodereview/rules/ssma/action-plan-panel.md` to understand intended behavior and check items.
Also check `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` near line 667 etc., to see distribution charts and adriana insights, to check raw pattern.
Let me also check how the existing occurrence panel handles insight raw patterns, and how it embeds initial JSON (to compare with json_encode|raw risk). Search in ssma/occurrence templates for application/json script blocks and json_encode raw.
Let me read the rules file and _tab_action_plan around lines relevant.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": ".opencodereview/rules/ssma/action-plan-panel.md"}
Result
File: .opencodereview/rules/ssma/action-plan-panel.md (Total lines: 154)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-154
1|#### Escopo desta regra
2|
3|Painel do Plano de Ação SSMA — abas Pendências, Visão Geral e Comparativo entre unidades.
4|
5|Arquivos cobertos:
6|- `src/Service/Ssma/ActionPlan/SsmaActionPlanPanelService.php`
7|- `src/Service/Ssma/ActionPlan/SsmaActionPlanPanelPresenter.php`
8|- `src/Controller/SsmaController.php` (métodos `planoAcaoIndex`, `planoAcaoPainel`, `planoAcaoPanelFilter`, `buildActionPlanPanelViewData`, `resolveActionPlanPanelMemberScope`)
9|- `public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js`
10|- `public/css/ssma/action_plan_panel.css`
11|- `templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_action_plan.html.twig` (lista de ações + relatório executivo; charts de distribuição **não** ficam aqui)
12|- `templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_table.html.twig`
13|- `templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel.html.twig` (charts de distribuição/gauges + painel operacional)
14|- `templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig`
15|
16|Fora de escopo: validação de ocorrência (`occurrence-approve`), aprofundamento ROS readonly, lista operacional da aba Ações (Lohr/Gustavo).
17|
18|---
19|
20|#### Problema de negócio
21|
22|1. **`/plano-acao?tab=tab_plano_painel` abria sem KPIs** — só `planoAcaoPainel` hidratava `action_plan_panel_data`; a index não. O JS (`updateKpiRow`) só atualiza cards já renderizados no SSR.
23|2. **Recorte “Próximo mês” escondia atrasos** — filtrar `deadline >= hoje` deixava gráficos de pendência vazios enquanto a aba Ações ainda mostrava ações vencidas.
24|3. **KPIs divergiam do Figma** — títulos antigos (Pendências até a data / Vencidas / Próximo prazo) em vez de Criadas / Concluídas / Aguardando validação / Final do Período.
25|4. **Markup duplicado** — KPI, pill e avatar na mão em vez dos includes do design system (`_card`, `_pill`, `_member_avatars_stack`).
26|
27|---
28|
29|#### Permissões — bloqueante se quebrar
30|
31|- As rotas `ssma_plano_acao_painel` (`GET /manager/ssma/plano-acao/painel`) e `ssma_plano_acao_panel_filter` (`GET /manager/ssma/plano-acao/panel/filter`) foram registradas em `GlobalPermissionListener` nas duas listas de controle de acesso (acesso ao hub e bypass de preflight). Qualquer alteração que remova essas rotas do listener causa 403 silencioso para todos os usuários.
32|- `planoAcaoPainel` e `planoAcaoPanelFilter` chamam `canAccessSsmaActionPlanHub()` antes de qualquer lógica. Se esse guard for removido ou contornado, a tela fica exposta sem verificação de permissão.
33|- O escopo de membros visíveis é resolvido por `resolveActionPlanPanelMemberScope`:
34| - Membro comum → vê apenas ações do próprio `memberId`.
35| - Supervisor/Gestor de Equipe → vê ações dos membros das equipes associadas.
36| - Gestor/admin (`canManageSsmaOccurrences` ou `memberIsSsmaGestorAdministrador`) → `null` (sem restrição).
37| - Contexto ausente (usuário não autenticado ou membro não encontrado) → array vazio `[]`, nunca `null`.
38|
39|---
40|
41|#### Contrato dos endpoints
42|
43|**`GET /manager/ssma/plano-acao/painel`**
44|- Renderiza `ssma/action_plan/index.html.twig` com `ssmaPlanoAcaoActiveTab = tab_plano_painel`.
45|- `planoAcaoIndex` (`GET /manager/ssma/plano-acao`) e `planoAcaoPainel` hidratam `action_plan_panel_data`. Sem isso a URL `?tab=tab_plano_painel` renderiza a aba Painel **sem** os 4 KPIs (o JS só atualiza cards já existentes).
46|- Query param `tab` na index define a aba ativa (`tab_plano_acoes` | `tab_plano_painel` | config | permissão).
47|
48|**`GET /manager/ssma/plano-acao/panel/filter`**
49|- Query params aceitos: `view` (pendencias | visao_geral | comparativo), `period`, `axis`, `team`, `vinculo`, `page`, `per_page` (máx 100), `management`, `area`, `exec_responsible`, `val_responsible`, `origin`.
50|- Retorna JSON `{ success: true, ... }` via `SsmaActionPlanPanelPresenter::presentFilterResponse`.
51|- Retorna 403 JSON `{ success: false, message: ... }` quando sem permissão — nunca lança exceção nem retorna HTML.
52|- View `comparativo` usa subsidiárias da rede (`resolveSsmaNetworkSubsidiaries`); demais views usam escopo da unidade selecionada.
53|
54|---
55|
56|#### Regras de agregação — bloqueante se quebrar
57|
58|- KPIs, gráficos e tabela de pendências devem usar os **mesmos filtros** de período, equipe, vínculo e responsáveis.
59|- **Origem da ação** é resolvida por `resolveOriginKey(origem, event_type)` com `LEFT JOIN ssma_events` em `fetchActions`. Categorias Figma: Acidente, ROS, Inspeção, Abordagem, Direito de Recusa. O gráfico “Pendências por origem” usa chaves estáveis (`presentSeededOriginChart`) — não reverter para label livre de `origem`.
60|- Paginação (`page`, `per_page`) se aplica apenas à listagem de pendências; visão geral usa limite fixo no carregamento inicial.
61|- Separação de responsabilidade obrigatória:
62| - Toda lógica de agregação/consulta fica em `SsmaActionPlanPanelService`.
63| - Toda formatação para template/JS fica em `SsmaActionPlanPanelPresenter`.
64| - Controller apenas orquestra: resolve escopo, chama service e presenter, devolve resposta.
65|- Não adicionar SQL/DQL direto no controller nem no presenter.
66|
67|---
68|
69|#### Frontend
70|
71|- **Componentes do design system (intencional):** os 4 KPIs do Painel usam `{% include 'components/ui/_card.html.twig' %}` — o mesmo padrão da aba Ações. Prioridade na tabela usa `_pill.html.twig`; responsáveis usam `_member_avatars_stack.html.twig`. **Não** recriar markup `ssma-ap-kpi-card` / `ssma-ap-responsible-avatar` nem editar `templates/components/**` nesta PR.
72|- **Layout Ações vs Painel (intencional):** a aba **Ações** (`_tab_action_plan.html.twig`) exibe a tabela em largura total (`col-12` em `_action_plan_table.html.twig`). Gráficos de distribuição (`ssma-action-plan-type-bar`, `ssma-action-plan-deadline-bar`) e gauges (`ssma-action-plan-project-gauge`, `ssma-action-plan-resolution-gauge`) ficam na aba **Painel** (`_tab_painel.html.twig`), alimentados por `action_plan_data` (bar_charts/gauges). Não recolocar charts na aba Ações sem alinhamento de produto. Esses 4 charts **não** passam pelos filtros AJAX do Painel (`/panel/filter`) — comportamento herdado da #685, não regressão desta PR.
73|- `initSsmaActionPlanCharts` / `reflowSsmaActionPlanCharts` (definidos em `_tab_action_plan.html.twig`, expostos em `window`) só rodam quando os containers existem no DOM (`hasSsmaActionPlanDistributionCharts`). Em `action_plan_panel.js`, `initDistributionCharts`/`reflowDistributionCharts` chamam esses helpers ao renderizar/redimensionar a visão Pendências.
74|- Filtros de view, período, eixo, equipe e vínculo disparam AJAX para `/panel/filter` sem recarregar a página.
75|- Carga inicial da aba Painel: o presenter PHP **sempre** devolve `charts` como objeto (mesmo sem dados). Por isso `onPainelTabVisible` **não** deve usar `!panelData.charts` como critério para disparar AJAX. A guarda correta é `charts.critical_pending_by_deadline.labels` vazio — nesse caso o JS chama `/panel/filter` para hidratar KPIs, gráficos e tabela. Se `labels` já tiver itens no SSR, o AJAX inicial não dispara.
76|- Respostas de sucesso, erro e validação usam o helper global `showToast` — nunca `alert()` nem toast local divergente.
77|- Chamada AJAX que muta dado deve enviar token CSRF e tratar 400/403/404 de forma distinta.
78|- CSS e JS do painel ficam em `public/css/ssma/action_plan_panel.css` e `public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js` — não alterar arquivos em `public/css/metahuman-standard/` nem `public/js/metahuman-standard/`.
79|
80|---
81|
82|#### Filtro de período — comportamento por view (intencional)
83|
84|**Pendências** (`view=pendencias`):
85|- Data inicial do datepicker é sempre hoje (fixada no JS), campo `readonly`.
86|- Data final só aceita datas futuras (`endInput.min = todayStr`).
87|- O recorte de **pendências** inclui ações **vencidas** (prazo anterior a hoje) e as que vencem até a data final. Não filtrar `deadline >= hoje` — isso esvazia KPIs/gráficos quando há atraso.
88|- KPIs da view Pendências (Figma): **Ações criadas no período**, **Concluídas**, **Aguardando validação**, **Final do Período**. Criadas/concluídas usam janela retrospectiva do mesmo tamanho do preset (ex.: 30 dias para `next_month`); o 4º card é a data final do recorte futuro.
89|- Período customizado é enviado ao backend no formato `pend:range:YYYY-MM-DD:YYYY-MM-DD`.
90|- O backend (`SsmaActionPlanPanelService`, linha ~509) reconhece esse prefixo e extrai o intervalo.
91|- Presets disponíveis: `week` (+7 dias), `fortnight` (+15 dias), `next_month` (+30 dias), `next_3_months` (+90 dias), `all_future` (sem limite).
92|
93|**Visão Geral** (`view=visao_geral`):
94|- Ambas as datas são selecionáveis pelo usuário.
95|- Ambas têm `max = hoje` — datas futuras são bloqueadas (visão retrospectiva).
96|- Período customizado é enviado como `range:YYYY-MM-DD:YYYY-MM-DD`.
97|- O backend reconhece esse formato na mesma função de resolução de período.
98|
99|---
100|
101|#### Seletor de granularidade do eixo X — compatibilidade com período (intencional)
102|
103|O select `#ssma-ap-chart-axis-filter` exibe apenas os eixos compatíveis com o período selecionado. A função `updateAxisOptionsForPeriod(period)` reconstrói dinamicamente as opções usando o mapeamento `AXIS_BY_PERIOD`:
104|
105|| Período | Eixos disponíveis |
106||---|---|
107|| `week` | Diário |
108|| `fortnight`, `next_month` | Diário, Semanal |
109|| `next_3_months`, `all_future` | Semanal, Mensal |
110|| `last_week` | Diário |
111|| `last_month` | Diário, Semanal |
112|| `last_3_months` | Semanal, Mensal |
113|| `last_6_months`, `last_year`, `total` | Mensal, Trimestral |
114|| `pend:range:*` / `range:*` (custom) | Semanal, Mensal (padrão conservador) |
115|
116|- Se o eixo atual não for válido para o novo período, o JS substitui automaticamente pelo primeiro da lista.
117|- O mapeamento é puramente de UX — o backend aceita qualquer valor de `axis` válido independente do período.
118|
119|---
120|
121|#### Escopo por perfil de acesso (intencional)
122|
123|| Tag de permissão | Escopo visível no painel |
124||---|---|
125|| **Membro** | Apenas ações das quais é responsável (`memberId` próprio) |
126|| **Supervisor de Equipe / Gestor de Equipe** | Ações dos membros das equipes que gerencia |
127|| **Supervisor** | Visualização total — sem restrição de escopo |
128|| **Supervisor de Área** | Somente ações da sua área organizacional |
129|| **Gestor Administrador / admin de plataforma** | Sem restrição (`null` scope) |
130|
131|A resolução do escopo é feita por `resolveActionPlanPanelMemberScope` no `SsmaController`. Nunca deve retornar `null` para usuário sem contexto — retorna `[]` (sem resultados).
132|
133|**Limitação conhecida — filtro de gerência em Pendências:**
134|O filtro de estrutura organizacional por gerência (`management`) está implementado apenas na view `visao_geral`. Na view `pendencias`, o backend não aplica o parâmetro `management` como filtro de dados e o presenter não retorna opções de gerência para esse contexto. Futura PR deve estender `buildFilterOptions()` e `buildPendenciasData()` para suportar esse filtro, seguindo o padrão já existente em `applyOverviewDimensionFilters()`.
135|
136|---
137|
138|#### O que NÃO sinalizar como bloqueio nesta PR
139|
140|1. **Gráficos do Gustavo sem filtro do Painel.** Barras tipo/prazo e gauges continuam em `action_plan_data` e ignoram equipe/vínculo/período do Painel — decisão de produto da #685.
141|2. **KPI com tendência em texto simples.** O Figma de Ocorrências usa `ssma-rate-trend`; aqui o trend vem como `content` no `_card` (ex.: `▲ 12%`). Não exigir macro `overview_kpi_card` nesta PR.
142|3. **`SsmaController` com múltiplas regras OCR.** O mesmo arquivo também cobre `occurrence-approve` e `occurrence-ros-aprofundamento-readonly` em entradas separadas do `rule.json` — intencional.
143|4. **Hidratação dupla na index.** `planoAcaoIndex` chama `buildActionPlanPanelViewData` mesmo quando a aba ativa é Ações — custo aceitável para garantir `?tab=tab_plano_painel` sem rota dedicada.
144|
145|---
146|
147|#### O que revisar com atenção especial
148|
149|1. **Escopo de dados por empresa** — confirmar que filtros de unidade nunca expõem dados de outra empresa que não esteja no escopo resolvido por `resolveSsmaUnidadeFilterScope`.
150|2. **Regressão no GlobalPermissionListener** — as duas entradas adicionadas (`ssma_plano_acao_painel` e `ssma_plano_acao_panel_filter`) não devem ser removidas em refatorações do listener.
151|3. **`planoAcaoIndex` sem `action_plan_panel_data`** — regressão que deixa a linha de KPIs vazia em `?tab=tab_plano_painel`.
152|4. **`filterPendenciasByDeadline` excluindo `deadline < hoje`** — regressão que esvazia pendências/gráficos quando há atraso.
153|5. **Tamanho do SsmaController** — o controller já é grande; qualquer adição de lógica de negócio diretamente nele (fora de orquestração) deve ser sinalizada como Atenção, não Critical, se for só orquestração de `buildActionPlanPanelViewData`.
154|
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "application/json.*json_encode|\\|json_encode\\|raw", "use_perl_regexp": true, "file_patterns": ["templates/ssma/"]}
Result
Note: The results have been truncated. Only showing first 100 results.
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/action_plan_report/index.html.twig
Match lines: 1
600|}|json_encode|raw }}</script>
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_action_plan.html.twig
Match lines: 14
342| var ssmaActionPlanGauges = {{ action_plan_data.gauges|default({})|json_encode|raw }};
343| var ssmaActionPlanTypeSeries = {{ action_plan_data.bar_charts.types|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
344| var ssmaActionPlanCharts = {{ action_plan_charts|merge({'actions_on_schedule': actions_on_schedule})|json_encode|raw }};
349| })|json_encode|raw }};
351| actions: {{ action_plan_actions|json_encode|raw }},
352| kpis: {{ action_plan_data.kpis|default({})|json_encode|raw }},
353| gauges: {{ action_plan_data.gauges|default({})|json_encode|raw }},
354| charts: {{ action_plan_charts|merge({'actions_on_schedule': actions_on_schedule})|json_encode|raw }},
356| types: {{ action_plan_data.bar_charts.types|default([])|json_encode|raw }}
359| var ssmaActionPlanDeleteUrl = {{ path('admin_ssma_action_plan_delete')|json_encode|raw }};
360| var ssmaActionPlanReopenUrlTemplate = {{ path('admin_ssma_action_reopen', {id: '__ID__'})|json_encode|raw }};
361| var ssmaActionPlanProjectsUrl = {{ path('ssma_action_plan_projects')|json_encode|raw }};
362| var ssmaActionLinkProjectUrlTemplate = {{ path('ssma_action_link_project', {id: '__ID__'})|json_encode|raw }};
363| var ssmaOccurrenceViewUrlTemplate = {{ path('admin_ssma_occurrence_view', {id: '__ID__'})|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_action_plan_config.html.twig
Match lines: 11
418| var vcAllMembers = {{ allMembers|json_encode|raw }};
419| var vcAllTeams = {{ teams|json_encode|raw }};
420| var vcAllRoles = {{ _vc_roles|json_encode|raw }};
429| member_ids: {{ (_vc_dv.member_ids|default([]))|json_encode|raw }},
430| team_ids: {{ (_vc_dv.team_ids|default([]))|json_encode|raw }},
431| role_names: {{ (_vc_dv.role_names|default([]))|json_encode|raw }}
437| member_ids: {{ (_vc_cl.member_ids|default([]))|json_encode|raw }},
438| team_ids: {{ (_vc_cl.team_ids|default([]))|json_encode|raw }},
439| role_names: {{ (_vc_cl.role_names|default([]))|json_encode|raw }}
845| var BUILTIN_KEYS = {{ ssma_builtin_action_keys|json_encode|raw }};
846| var initialConfig = {{ action_type_config|default({ types: [] })|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel.html.twig
Match lines: 2
305| }|json_encode|raw }}</script>
306| <script type="application/json" id="ssma-ap-panel-data-json">{{ panel|json_encode|raw }}</script>
File: templates/ssma/cause_tree/tree_view/index.html.twig
Match lines: 5
478| var card = {{ (causeTreeCurrentCard|default(null))|json_encode|raw }} || {};
479| var members = {{ (allMembers|default([]))|json_encode|raw }} || [];
480| var updateUrl = {{ (causeTreeManageRoutes.update|default(''))|json_encode|raw }};
481| var viewUrl = {{ (causeTreeCurrentCard ? url('ssma_cause_tree_view', {treeId: causeTreeCurrentCard.id}) : '')|json_encode|raw }};
482| var canShareEdit = {{ (ssmaCanMutateThisCauseTree|default(false))|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/cause_tree/tree_view/tabs/_tab_action_plan.html.twig
Match lines: 9
451| var actionPlanSaveUrlTemplate = {{ path('ssma_cause_tree_action_plan_node_update', {'id': 0, 'treeId': causeTreePayload.meta.treeId|default(0)})|json_encode|raw }};
452| var actionPlanAddUrlTemplate = {{ path('ssma_cause_tree_action_plan_node_add', {'id': 0, 'treeId': causeTreePayload.meta.treeId|default(0)})|json_encode|raw }};
453| var actionPlanDeleteUrlTemplate = {{ path('ssma_cause_tree_action_plan_entry_delete', {'id': 0, 'treeId': causeTreePayload.meta.treeId|default(0)})|json_encode|raw }};
454| var actionPlanApplyUrl = {{ path('ssma_cause_tree_action_plan_apply', {'treeId': causeTreePayload.meta.treeId|default(0)})|json_encode|raw }};
455| var causeTreeCurrentCard = {{ causeTreeCurrentCard|default({})|json_encode|raw }};
1312| actionType: {{ action_type_options|json_encode|raw }},
1313| controlHierarchy: {{ control_hierarchy_options|json_encode|raw }},
1314| priority: {{ priority_options|json_encode|raw }},
1315| responsible: {{ responsible_options|json_encode|raw }}
File: templates/ssma/effectiveness/index.html.twig
Match lines: 2
77|<script type="application/json" id="effectiveness-actions-payload">{{ dashboard_action_rows|default([])|json_encode(15)|raw }}</script>
78|<script type="application/json" id="effectiveness-copy-payload">{{ copy|default({})|json_encode(15)|raw }}</script>
File: templates/ssma/effectiveness/partials/_effectiveness_chart.html.twig
Match lines: 1
93| <script type="application/json" id="effectiveness-chart-payload">{{ chart|default({})|json_encode|raw }}</script>
File: templates/ssma/leadership_evaluation/index.html.twig
Match lines: 1
52|<script type="application/json" id="leadership-leaders-payload">{{ leader_rows|default([])|json_encode(15)|raw }}</script>
File: templates/ssma/leadership_evaluation/partials/_leadership_charts.html.twig
Match lines: 1
36| <script type="application/json" id="leadership-effectiveness-payload">{{ leadershipPayload|json_encode(15)|raw }}</script>
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/deep_dive_group.html.twig
Match lines: 1
662| var APRO_GROUP_ID = {{ grupo.id|default(0)|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig
Match lines: 24
1364| var currentOccurrenceId = {{ occurrence.id|json_encode|raw }};
1365| var currentIsSsmaEvent = {{ occurrence.is_ssma_event|default(false)|json_encode|raw }};
1367| var allMembersList = shared.allMembers || {{ allMembers|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
1368| var evidenceUploaderName = {{ (evidence_uploader_member.name|default('A'))|json_encode|raw }};
1370| var evidenceChipInitials = {{ evidence_chip_initials|default(['A'])|json_encode|raw }};
1371| var actionTypeLabels = {{ action_type_labels|default({})|json_encode|raw }};
1373| var ssmaActionDeleteUrlTemplate = {{ path('admin_ssma_action_delete', {id: '__ID__'})|json_encode|raw }};
1374| var ssmaActionReopenUrlTemplate = {{ path('admin_ssma_action_reopen', {id: '__ID__'})|json_encode|raw }};
1375| var ssmaActionPlanProjectsUrl = {{ path('ssma_action_plan_projects')|json_encode|raw }};
1376| var ssmaActionLinkProjectUrlTemplate = {{ path('ssma_action_link_project', {id: '__ID__'})|json_encode|raw }};
1377| var SSMA_OCC_EVIDENCE_UPLOAD_URL = (window.SsmaShared && window.SsmaShared.ssmaEvidenceUploadUrl) || {{ path('admin_ssma_occurrence_evidence_upload')|json_encode|raw }};
1378| var SSMA_OCC_EVIDENCE_APPEND_URL = {{ path('admin_ssma_occurrence_evidence_append')|json_encode|raw }};
1379| var SSMA_OCC_SST_EXAMS_URL = {{ path('admin_ssma_occurrence_sst_exams')|json_encode|raw }};
1380| var SSMA_OCC_SST_ATTACH_URL = {{ path('admin_ssma_occurrence_sst_attach')|json_encode|raw }};
1381| var SSMA_OCC_SST_REVIEW_URL = {{ path('admin_ssma_occurrence_sst_review')|json_encode|raw }};
1382| var ssmaOccurrenceIndexUrl = {{ path('ssma_ocorrencia_index')|json_encode|raw }};
1383| var ssmaCauseTreeCreateUrl = {{ path('ssma_cause_tree_tree_create')|json_encode|raw }};
1384| var ssmaCauseTreeViewPath = {{ path('ssma_cause_tree_view')|json_encode|raw }};
1385| var ssmaCauseTreeMetaUrl = {{ path('ssma_occurrences_cause_tree_meta')|json_encode|raw }};
1585| var SSMA_OCC_RECORD_TYPE = {{ (occurrence.is_ssma_event|default(false) ? 'event' : 'occurrence')|json_encode|raw }};
1586| var SSMA_OCC_RECORD_ID = {{ occurrence.id|json_encode|raw }};
2713| var EVIDENCE_META_URL = {{ path('admin_ssma_occurrence_evidence_meta')|json_encode|raw }};
3087| var approveUrl = {{ path('admin_ssma_occurrence_approve', {id: occurrence.id})|json_encode|raw }};
3190|window.SSMA_COMMITTEE_DETAIL_RECORD = {{ occurrence|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/ocurrence_report/index.html.twig
Match lines: 1
1080| <script type="application/json" id="ssma-exec-severity-data">{{ severityRanking|json_encode|raw }}</script>
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig
Match lines: 9
1432| window.ssmaOccurrenceTypeConfig = {{ occurrence_type_config|default({ types: [] })|json_encode|raw }};
1435| window.SSMA_ALLOWED_CREATE_TYPES = {{ ssmaAllowedCreateTypes|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
1446| window.SSMA_EV_MEMBER_TEAM = {{ ev_member_team_map|json_encode|raw }};
1509| })({{ _evMembersList|json_encode|raw }});
1513| var EV_USER_TECHNICAL_TYPES = {{ user_technical_types|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
1514| var EV_LOGGED_MEMBER_ID = {{ (ssma_logged_member_id|default(0))|json_encode|raw }};
1522| var EV_IS_ADMIN_APROFUNDAMENTO = {{ _ev_admin_aprof|json_encode|raw }};
1533| { id: {{ member.id|json_encode|raw }}, name: {{ member.name|json_encode|raw }} }{% if not loop.last %},{% endif %}
1538| window.SSMA_EVENT_FORM_DEFAULTS = {{ ssma_event_form_defaults|default({})|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_tab_occurrence_type_permissions.html.twig
Match lines: 2
471| const saveUrlTpl = {{ path('ssma_occurrence_create_permissions_save', {memberId: 999999999})|replace({'999999999': '__MID__'})|json_encode|raw }};
476| let typeColumns = {{ _occ_type_columns|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/tabs/_tab_config.html.twig
Match lines: 3
712| var SSMA_BUILTIN_KEYS = {{ ssma_builtin_type_keys|json_encode|raw }};
713| var initialOtc = {{ occurrence_type_config|default({ types: [] })|json_encode|raw }};
1559| var URL_FLASH_APPROVERS = {{ path('admin_ssma_occurrence_flash_report_approvers')|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/tabs/_tab_dashboard.html.twig
Match lines: 3
1306| : {{ horas_data|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
1445| var OC_PAINEL_FILTER_URL = {{ path('admin_ssma_dashboard_filter')|json_encode|raw }};
1446| var OC_PAINEL_SEMANTIC_URL = {{ path('admin_ssma_dashboard_semantic')|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/tabs/_tab_occurrence_panel.html.twig
Match lines: 2
225| var OC_PAINEL_FILTER_URL = {{ path('admin_ssma_dashboard_filter')|json_encode|raw }};
226| var OC_PAINEL_SEMANTIC_URL = {{ path('admin_ssma_dashboard_semantic')|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/tabs/_tab_occurrences.html.twig
Match lines: 2
2433| var SSMA_OCC_EXPORT_URL = {{ path('ssma_occurrences_export')|json_encode|raw }};
2522| unitLabel = {{ ssma_head_office.name|default('Matriz')|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/tabs/panel/_panel_comparativo_filiais_scripts.html.twig
Match lines: 2
10| })|json_encode|raw }};
47|var COMP_FILTER_URL = {{ path('admin_ssma_ocorrencia_comparativo_filter')|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/tabs/panel/_panel_scripts.html.twig
Match lines: 9
5| var OC_PAINEL_SEMANTIC_URL = {{ path('admin_ssma_dashboard_semantic')|json_encode|raw }};
7| window.ssmaDashboardData = {{ dashboard|json_encode|raw }};
8| var panelData = {{ panel|json_encode|raw }};
9| var ssmaHorasDataInitial = {{ horas_data|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
15| })|json_encode|raw }};
21| })|json_encode|raw }};
26| })|json_encode|raw }};
31| })|json_encode|raw }};
37| })|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/partials/_actions_bar_chart.html.twig
Match lines: 5
177| {{ chart_series|json_encode|raw }},
179| defaultColor: {{ default_color|json_encode|raw }},
180| emptyStateHtml: {{ empty_state_html|json_encode|raw }},
181| emptyStateTitle: {{ empty_state_title|json_encode|raw }},
182| emptyStateSubtitle: {{ empty_state_subtitle|json_encode|raw }}
File: templates/ssma/partials/_export_table_print_meta.html.twig
Match lines: 6
14| companyName: {{ (_export_company ? _export_company.name : '')|json_encode|raw }},
15| companyLogo: {{ _export_logo|json_encode|raw }},
16| operationalUnit: {{ (ssma_export_operational_unit|default(_export_company ? _export_company.name : ''))|json_encode|raw }},
17| exportedByName: {{ _export_user_name|json_encode|raw }},
18| exportedByMatricula: {{ (ssma_export_matricula|default(''))|json_encode|raw }},
19| exportedByInitial: {{ (_export_user_name|default('U')|slice(0, 1)|upper)|json_encode|raw }}
File: templates/ssma/partials/_modal_action.html.twig
Match lines: 11
771| var ACTION_CREATE_URL = {{ path('admin_ssma_action_create')|json_encode|raw }};
772| var ACTION_GET_URL = {{ path('admin_ssma_action_get', {id: '__ID__'})|json_encode|raw }};
775| { id: {{ member.id|json_encode|raw }}, name: {{ member.name|json_encode|raw }} }{% if not loop.last %},{% endif %}
778| var ACTION_VALIDATOR_CONFIG = {{ (validator_config|default({}))|json_encode|raw }};
781| { value: {{ action_type.value|json_encode|raw }}, label: {{ action_type.label|json_encode|raw }} }{% if not loop.last %},{% endif %}
786| { value: {{ option.value|json_encode|raw }}, label: {{ option.label|json_encode|raw }} }{% if not loop.last %},{% endif %}
815| ocorrencia: {{ path('ssma_action_occurrences_search')|json_encode|raw }},
816| inspecao: {{ path('ssma_action_inspections_search')|json_encode|raw }},
817| abordagem: {{ path('ssma_action_abordagens_search')|json_encode|raw }}
1050| var INSPECTION_GET_URL_TPL = {{ path('admin_ssma_inspection_get', {id: '__ID__'})|json_encode|raw }};
1341| url: {{ path('ssma_action_plan_projects')|json_encode|raw }},
File: templates/ssma/partials/_modal_delete_confirm.html.twig
Match lines: 7
246| $('#ssmaDeleteConfirmModalTitle').text({{ ssma_delete_default_title|json_encode|raw }});
247| $('#ssmaDeleteConfirmModalMessage').html({{ ssma_delete_default_message|json_encode|raw }});
251| .html({{ ssma_delete_default_button_label|json_encode|raw }})
275| $('#ssmaDeleteConfirmModalTitle').text(options.title || {{ ssma_delete_default_title|json_encode|raw }});
276| $('#ssmaDeleteConfirmModalMessage').html(options.message || {{ ssma_delete_default_message|json_encode|raw }});
279| .html(options.buttonLabel || {{ ssma_delete_default_button_label|json_encode|raw }})
315| var VIEW_URL_TPL = {{ ssma_ros_view_url_tpl|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/partials/_shared_module_assets.html.twig
Match lines: 5
434| shared.ssmaEvidenceUploadUrl = shared.ssmaEvidenceUploadUrl || {{ path('admin_ssma_occurrence_evidence_upload')|json_encode|raw }};
436| shared.membersSearchUrl = shared.membersSearchUrl || {{ path('ssma_members_search')|json_encode|raw }};
471| shared.allMembers = {{ allMembers|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
472| shared.ssmaTeams = {{ ssmaTeams|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
474| shared.uploadsPhotosBase = shared.uploadsPhotosBase || {{ asset('uploads/photos/')|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/prevention/approach/index.html.twig
Match lines: 8
774| var currentAbordagemId = {{ abordagem.id|json_encode|raw }};
776| var actionTypeLabels = {{ action_type_labels|default({})|json_encode|raw }};
777| var ssmaActionDeleteUrlTemplate = {{ path('admin_ssma_action_delete', {id: '__ID__'})|json_encode|raw }};
778| var ssmaActionReopenUrlTemplate = {{ path('admin_ssma_action_reopen', {id: '__ID__'})|json_encode|raw }};
784| shared.resetCoachingEvidenceField('abv_page_coaching', {{ abordagem.coaching_evidencia|default('')|json_encode|raw }}, '');
804| var URL_PAGE_COACHING_SAVE = {{ path('ssma_abordagem_coaching_save', {id: 999999999})|json_encode|raw }};
821| setCoachingSatisfacaoRadios('abv_page_coaching_sat', {{ abordagem.coaching_satisfacao|default(null)|json_encode|raw }});
824| shared.resetCoachingEvidenceField('abv_page_coaching', {{ abordagem.coaching_evidencia|default('')|json_encode|raw }}, '');
File: templates/ssma/prevention/inspection/index.html.twig
Match lines: 5
648| var currentInspectionId = {{ inspection.id|json_encode|raw }};
650| var allMembersList = shared.allMembers || {{ allMembers|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
651| var actionTypeLabels = {{ action_type_labels|default({})|json_encode|raw }};
652| var ssmaActionDeleteUrlTemplate = {{ path('admin_ssma_action_delete', {id: '__ID__'})|json_encode|raw }};
653| var ssmaActionReopenUrlTemplate = {{ path('admin_ssma_action_reopen', {id: '__ID__'})|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/prevention/modals/_modal_approach.html.twig
Match lines: 20
1303| var URL_CREATE = {{ path('ssma_abordagem_create')|json_encode|raw }};
1304| var URL_UPDATE = {{ path('ssma_abordagem_update', {id: 999999999})|json_encode|raw }};
1305| var URL_GET = {{ path('ssma_abordagem_get', {id: 999999999})|json_encode|raw }};
1306| var URL_QUESTIONARIOS = {{ path('ssma_abordagem_questionarios')|json_encode|raw }};
1308| var URL_FORMULARIO_DEFAULT = {{ path('ssma_abordagem_formulario_default')|json_encode|raw }};
1310| var URL_ABORDAGEM_QC_GET = {{ path('ssma_abordagem_questionario_config_get')|json_encode|raw }};
1312| var AB_DEFAULT_OBSERVADOR_ID = {{ default_abordagem_observador_id|default(null)|json_encode|raw }};
1314| var AB_DEFAULT_QUESTIONARIO_ID = {{ abordagem_questionario_config.questionario_padrao_id|default(null)|json_encode|raw }};
1316| var SSMA_COMPANY_ID = {{ ssma_company_id|default(null)|json_encode|raw }};
1322| name: {{ m.name|json_encode|raw }},
1323| created_at: {{ (m.created_at ?? null)|json_encode|raw }},
1324| work_shift_id: {{ (m.work_shift_id ?? null)|json_encode|raw }},
1325| work_shift_ids: {{ (m.work_shift_ids ?? [])|json_encode|raw }}
1331| var AB_COACH_IDS = {{ abordagem_coach_ids|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
1345| { id: {{ member.id }}, name: {{ member.name|json_encode|raw }} },
1359| var AB_FORMULARIOS = {{ (abordagem_questionario_config.questionnaires ?? [])|json_encode|raw }};
1364| var AB_FORMULARIO_PADRAO_ATIVO = {{ ((abordagem_questionario_config|default({})).formulario_padrao_ativo ?? true)|json_encode|raw }};
1369| var AB_FORMULARIO_SELECAO_OCULTA = {{ ((abordagem_questionario_config|default({})).formulario_selecao_oculta ?? false)|json_encode|raw }};
1371| var AB_METAHUMAN_QUESTIONNAIRE = {{ abordagem_metahuman_questionnaire|default({})|json_encode|raw }};
3967| || {{ (occurrence_type_config.selected_locations|default(occurrence_type_config.locations|default([])))|json_encode|raw }});
File: templates/ssma/prevention/modals/_modal_approach_view.html.twig
Match lines: 3
376| var URL_GET = {{ path('ssma_abordagem_get', {id: 999999999})|json_encode|raw }};
377| var URL_COACHING_SAVE = {{ path('ssma_abordagem_coaching_save', {id: 999999999})|json_encode|raw }};
379| var URL_FORMULARIO_DEFAULT = {{ path('ssma_abordagem_formulario_default')|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/prevention/modals/_modal_inspection.html.twig
Match lines: 7
672| var INSP_DEFAULT_RESPONSIBLE_ID = {{ default_insp_responsible_id|default(null)|json_encode|raw }};
673| var INSP_DEFAULT_TEAM_ID = {{ default_inspection_team_id|default(null)|json_encode|raw }};
674| var INSP_MEMBER_TEAM = {{ insp_member_team_map|json_encode|raw }};
678| { id: {{ member.id }}, name: {{ member.name|json_encode|raw }} },
717| var INSP_TYPE_OPTIONS = {{ inspection_types|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
747| || {{ (occurrence_type_config.selected_locations|default(occurrence_type_config.locations|default([])))|json_encode|raw }});
793| || {{ (occurrence_type_config.selected_locations|default(occurrence_type_config.locations|default([])))|json_encode|raw }});
File: templates/ssma/prevention/modals/_modal_prevention_global_goals.html.twig
Match lines: 1
149| var URL_GLOBAL = {{ path('admin_ssma_prevencao_global_metas')|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/prevention/partials/_meta_abono_section.html.twig
Match lines: 10
323| var LIST_URL = {{ path('admin_ssma_prevencao_meta_abono_list')|json_encode|raw }};
324| var CREATE_URL = {{ path('admin_ssma_prevencao_meta_abono_create')|json_encode|raw }};
325| var REVIEW_URL_TPL = {{ path('admin_ssma_prevencao_meta_abono_review', {id: 999999})|json_encode|raw }};
326| var CANCEL_URL_TPL = {{ path('admin_ssma_prevencao_meta_abono_cancel', {id: 999999})|json_encode|raw }};
327| var UPDATE_URL_TPL = {{ path('admin_ssma_prevencao_meta_abono_update', {id: 999999})|json_encode|raw }};
328| var SUBMIT_URL_TPL = {{ path('admin_ssma_prevencao_meta_abono_submit', {id: 999999})|json_encode|raw }};
329| var DELETE_URL_TPL = {{ path('admin_ssma_prevencao_meta_abono_delete', {id: 999999})|json_encode|raw }};
330| var CURRENT_MEMBER_ID = {{ (ssma_logged_member_id|default(0))|json_encode|raw }};
331| var CAN_MANAGE = {{ (ssmaCanEditPreventionMetasTable|default(false))|json_encode|raw }};
332| var LIST_MINE_ONLY = {{ (prev_meta_abono_scope_mine|default(false))|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/prevention/prevention_report/index.html.twig
Match lines: 2
683|<script type="application/json" id="ssma-prev-exec-risk-chart-data">{{ riskBarChart|json_encode|raw }}</script>
692|}|json_encode|raw }}</script>
File: templates/ssma/prevention/tabs/_tab_approaches.html.twig
Match lines: 3
724| var SSMA_AB_EXPORT_URL = {{ path('ssma_abordagens_export')|json_encode|raw }};
832| var url = {{ path('ssma_abordagem_duplicar', {id: 999999999})|json_encode|raw }}.replace('999999999', String(id));
858| var url = {{ path('ssma_abordagem_delete', {id: 999999999})|json_encode|raw }}.replace('999999999', String(id));
File: templates/ssma/prevention/tabs/_tab_inspections.html.twig
Match lines: 1
929| var SSMA_INSP_EXPORT_URL = {{ path('ssma_inspections_export')|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/prevention/tabs/_tab_prevention_config.html.twig
Match lines: 4
884| var URL_ABONO_APPROVERS = {{ path('admin_ssma_prevencao_meta_abono_approvers')|json_encode|raw }};
885| var URL_ABORDAGEM_COACHES = {{ path('admin_ssma_prevencao_abordagem_coaches')|json_encode|raw }};
990| var abonoApproverMemberSeed = buildAbonoApproverOptionsFromMembers({{ allMembers|default([])|json_encode|raw }});
992| var aqcData = {{ abordagem_questionario_config|default({ questionnaires: [], questionario_padrao_id: null })|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/prevention/tabs/_tab_prevention_goals.html.twig
Match lines: 5
483| var SAVE_URL = {{ path('admin_ssma_prevencao_member_meta_save')|json_encode|raw }};
484| var METAS_FILTER_URL = {{ path('admin_ssma_prevencao_metas_filter')|json_encode|raw }};
485| var CURRENT_PERIOD = {{ metasPeriod|json_encode|raw }};
486| var PERIOD_REFS = {{ metaPeriodRefs|json_encode|raw }};
487| var MEMBER_DEFAULTS = {{ metaMemberDefaults|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/prevention/tabs/_tab_prevention_panel.html.twig
Match lines: 11
1023| var prevPanelCharts = {{ prevencao_panel_charts|default({})|json_encode|raw }};
1024| var prevAbordagens = {{ _abFinalizadas|map(a => {flag_risco: a.flag_risco})|json_encode|raw }};
1025| var prevFalhasEquipe = {{ (prevencao_panel_charts.falhas_equipe|default(_falhasEquipeList))|json_encode|raw }};
1026| var prevFoundRates = {{ _foundRates|json_encode|raw }};
1028| var PREV_PAINEL_FILTER_URL = {{ path('admin_ssma_prevencao_panel_filter')|json_encode|raw }};
1029| var PREV_PAINEL_SEMANTIC_URL = {{ path('admin_ssma_prevencao_panel_semantic')|json_encode|raw }};
1130| })|json_encode|raw }};
1136| })|json_encode|raw }};
1141| })|json_encode|raw }};
2380|var AB_PANEL_FILTER_URL = {{ path('admin_ssma_prevencao_abordagem_panel_filter')|json_encode|raw }};
2381|var AB_VIEW_URL_TEMPLATE = {{ path('ssma_abordagem_view', {id: 999999999})|replace({'999999999': '__ID__'})|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/refusal/partials/_modal_register.html.twig
Match lines: 6
303|window.ssmaOccurrenceTypeConfig = {{ occurrence_type_config|default({ types: [] })|json_encode|raw }};
318| var createUrl = {{ path('ssma_direito_recusa_create')|json_encode|raw }};
319| var updateUrlTpl = {{ path('ssma_direito_recusa_update', {id: 999999})|json_encode|raw }};
322| var defaultFlow = {{ preferredFlow|json_encode|raw }};
326| recordsById[{{ row.id }}] = {{ row|json_encode|raw }};
528| $('#rr_direct_leader_member_id').val({{ (refusal_direct_leader ? refusal_direct_leader.id : '')|json_encode|raw }});
File: templates/ssma/refusal/tabs/_tab_config.html.twig
Match lines: 1
80| var saveUrl = {{ path('ssma_direito_recusa_config_save')|json_encode|raw }};
File: templates/ssma/refusal/tabs/_tab_panel.html.twig
Match lines: 2
359| var panel = {{ panel|json_encode|raw }};
360| var emptyHtml = {{ ssma_rr_chart_empty|json_encode|raw }};
Request #5
deepseek-v4-flash
P:92.84K C:2.48K CR:80.9K CW:0
19099ms
Reasoning
I now understand the context. The `|json_encode|raw` pattern is used extensively in SSMA templates, so flagging the JSON escaping issue as high is likely over-sensitive given that (a) it's a common pattern, and (b) PHP json_encode escapes forward slashes. Also the "effectiveness" templates use `json_encode(15)` (JSON_HEX_TAG etc. = 15? Actually JSON_HEX_TAG is 1, JSON_HEX_AMP 2, JSON_HEX_APOS 4, JSON_HEX_QUOT 8 → 15). Interesting — some templates use `json_encode(15)` which includes JSON_HEX_TAG. This means in some places they do the hex encoding. So the codebase is split.
Given the review plan, I need to weigh. Since PHP default json_encode escapes slashes, `</script>` inside a JSON string is not a real breakout. However, the HTML spec includes "script data escaped state" — an important edge: if the JSON contains the sequence `<!--` (which can occur in user data, e.g. a comment like `<!--` in a description) then the parser enters escaped state and the closing sequence becomes `</script>` detection changes: In the "script data escaped" state, the parser only exits script when it sees `-->`. So a user-supplied `<!--` inside the JSON, followed later by crafted content ending in `-->`, can confuse the HTML parser — a real but classic concern; standard mitigation is JSON_HEX_TAG. Since other new files in the same codebase (effectiveness, leadership_evaluation) already use `json_encode(15)` when embedding user-controlled rows in `<script type="application/json">`, this is a fair maintainability/security comment (medium), but given the `</script>` claim is technically wrong for PHP's default escaping, I should phrase carefully. Actually, wait: Twig `json_encode` filter — does Twig pass additional flags by default? Let me recall Twig's `json_encode` implementation:
```php
function twig_jsonencode_filter($value, $options = 0)
{
if ($options & JSON_PRETTY_PRINT) { ... }
return json_encode($value, $options);
}
```
Hmm, in Twig 3, I recall the json_encode filter default is 0; but wait — Symfony's `JsonSerializable`... Actually there is a subtlety: Twig's CoreExtension `encodeJson` method: `json_encode($value, $options)`. And the default when called as filter `{{ x|json_encode }}` → options = 0. However, some Twig versions apply `JSON_HEX_TAG|JSON_HEX_APOS|JSON_HEX_AMP|JSON_HEX_QUOT`? No, I don't think Twig does by default.
PHP json_encode with options=0 escapes slashes by default (no JSON_UNESCAPED_SLASHES). So `</script>` → `<\/script>`, safe for `</script>` breakout. So the specific "parser ends the block before the time" claim is inaccurate. However `<!--` double-escaped state is valid concern. I think it's not worth flagging as high. If I flag at all, it should be low/medium and accurately phrased. Actually the review plan asked me to verify; verification shows this is a repo-wide pattern (many json_encode|raw blocks), some use json_encode(15). Because this new file passes user content (action titles/descriptions) inside `<script type="application/json">` — same as many existing. I'll not flag as critical. Could flag low to suggest json_encode(constant('JSON_HEX_TAG')) for consistency with effectiveness template? But that's a style/maintainability suggestion. Hmm, given user rule that comments should be objective and not on correct code. Since repo pattern widely uses raw json_encode, and it's arguably safe because of slash escaping, I might skip or downgrade.
Let me weigh actual serious issues found:
1. **Offcanvas contract mismatch** — HIGH. Confirmed: partial not included anywhere; JS targets nonexistent IDs; data fields mismatch. Let me double check whether the offcanvas partial may be intended to be included by `_modal_offcanvas.html.twig` embed `ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas`. But since not included anywhere in any template of repo, the modal won't render. Unless it's included by one of the "other changed files" not in review. Wait: "Other changed files in this update (not in this review group)" is empty. Hmm, but the PR describes 9 files changed; the review group includes 8 of them (css, js, 6 twig). The md file .opencodereview/rules. So the offcanvas partial is listed but not included anywhere. So indeed the partial exists but is orphan. And the JS references IDs and functions that don't exist in any file → the "Visualizar" flow is broken. But wait — perhaps there is a separate intended file: maybe `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` includes an offcanvas with the IDs the JS expects (ssma-ap-action-view-title)? Let me search to be thorough for `ssmaApActionView` and `openOffcanvas` and check for an older offcanvas or modal in tab_action_plan. Search didn't show any other occurrence of `ssmaApActionView` or `openOffcanvasssmaApActionView` outside action_plan_panel.js. So nothing. Confirm no other template contains IDs `ssma-ap-action-view-title` (search returned only JS). Also confirm offcanvas file not referenced. So HIGH issue stands: the new "Visualizar" button won't show anything because:
- The offcanvas partial is never included in the rendered pages (orphan file).
- Even if it were, the JS fills `ssma-ap-action-view-*` ids that the twig doesn't define (twig uses `data-ap-detail`).
Actually careful: maybe the offcanvas partial is intended to be included by a file outside this diff that doesn't exist yet? It doesn't matter: as merged, clicking "Visualizar" does nothing visible. I'll flag.
Where to anchor the comment? JS lines 3000-3035 `openActionViewOffcanvas`. Or the twig partial anchor. Best to put the comment in the JS where the mismatch is (newly added). I'll comment on `function openActionViewOffcanvas(btn) {`.
2. **Table SSR buttons lack data attributes**: In `_tab_painel.html.twig`, the initial SSR of the pendencias table builds `action_cell` with only `data-action-id`, no data-action-title etc. Even after the JS re-renders on filter, clicking a visible button before AJAX may show blank. But given issue 1 makes the whole offcanvas nonfunctional, this is secondary; could mention in same comment or separate low.
3. **Insights raw HTML injection**: Twig `{{ insight|raw }}` and JS builds `<li>' + item + '</li>'`. Need to verify whether insight strings are sanitized at backend or contain user-echoed data. Search backend files for building main_insights etc. Let's search in src/Service/Ssma. The panel service PHP. Search text: 'main_insights' in src. Also look for the occurrence panel precedent with same pattern; but out of scope to compare. This could be medium. The review plan wants me to confirm. Since these insights are likely AI-generated plain text (with `<strong>` maybe allowed). Let's search src for these keys.
4. **html2canvas double load** — confirmed static include at _tab_painel.html.twig:594 AND ensureHtml2Canvas lazy loader in JS. If you load lazily only when exporting, having static include makes lazy loader pointless and adds ~1MB to page load every time the painel tab opens. Medium/low. It's also duplicated in many templates in repo (static). I'll flag as low/medium (performance). Might anchor to the static script tag line 594 in _tab_painel.html.twig.
5. **Large monolithic JS/CSS duplication** — maintainability comment, medium; with near-duplicate functions `updateKpiRow` and `updateOverviewKpiRow` in same file. Confirmed duplicate in same file (about 50 lines each identical logic). Also huge 3153-line file newly added. Given user rule #1 for JS: big files that mix lots of responsibilities must be flagged. I'll flag medium.
6. **`var` usage** — low.
7. **Dead code** — `resetCustomSelect` unused confirmed. CSS orphan rules for `ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns` etc. Also the CSS includes many classes; but check if `ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns` exists in twig markup. Let me search twig for these classes. Quick search.
Also: JS `buildSemanticPillGroup` output and `.ssma-ap-overview-semantic-*` etc.
8. **`origin_url` scheme allowlist**: need to check backend building of origin_url. Search src for 'origin_url'. Already searched: no matches in repo? Wait code_search 'origin_url' returned only JS. Perhaps backend builds 'origin_url' via key in PHP with different casing. Not found → likely the panel data for pendencias built in a PHP service file not present in repo? Actually rules md references src/Service/Ssma/ActionPlan/SsmaActionPlanPanelService.php which is presumably part of this PR but not in review group (maybe in another change). Since we can't confirm whether origin_url is internal route, I'll keep low or skip. Actually if origin_url is internal route built by backend with url() helper, it's fine. Skip maybe mention low.
Let me now do targeted searches:
- search templates for 'ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns' & 'ssma-adriana-split' to confirm orphan CSS.
- search src for insight building 'main_insights'/'follow_up_questions' and `common_factors`.
- Check `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` lines around 245 for possible offcanvas/`action-plan-view` existence; maybe there's an existing offcanvas `ssmaActionPlanView`? Search for "ActionView" in templates; earlier search returned nothing. Actually search 'ActionView' general.
Let me batch.
Tool Calls (3)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns|ssma-ap-overview-semantic-item|ssma-ap-semantic-factor-row", "use_perl_regexp": true, "file_patterns": ["templates/", "public/css/ssma/action_plan_panel.css"]}
Result
File: public/css/ssma/action_plan_panel.css
Match lines: 16
301|#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .ssma-ap-semantic-factor-row {
309|#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .ssma-ap-semantic-factor-row:last-child {
318|#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .ssma-ap-semantic-factor-row .ssma-ap-semantic-label {
416|#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns {
423|#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .ssma-ap-overview-semantic-item {
428|#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .ssma-ap-overview-semantic-item + .ssma-ap-overview-semantic-item {
434|#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .ssma-ap-overview-semantic-item:first-child {
439|#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .ssma-ap-overview-semantic-item:last-child {
469|#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .ssma-ap-overview-semantic-item-title {
476|#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .ssma-ap-overview-semantic-item-text {
661| #ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns {
666| #ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .ssma-ap-overview-semantic-item {
670| #ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .ssma-ap-overview-semantic-item + .ssma-ap-overview-semantic-item {
676| #ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .ssma-ap-overview-semantic-item:first-child {
680| #ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .ssma-ap-overview-semantic-item:last-child {
1160| #ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .ssma-ap-semantic-factor-row .ssma-ap-semantic-label {
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "main_insights|follow_up_questions|common_factors", "use_perl_regexp": true}
Result
File: docs/adriana-cognitive-layer/decisions/ADR-007-ssma-painel-semantica-layer.md
Match lines: 1
38| - `common_factors` / `high_risk_factors` (`label`, `count`)
File: public/js/people-analytics/modules/saude-organizacional-dashboard.js
Match lines: 3
710| const directQuestions = Array.isArray(analysis && analysis.follow_up_questions)
711| ? analysis.follow_up_questions.filter(Boolean)
795| 'Gere uma análise executiva curta de Saúde Organizacional conectando score, risco psicossocial, absenteísmo e evolução do período. Use tom prático para liderança e inclua exatamente 3 perguntas de acompanhamento relevantes em follow_up_questions.',
File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js
Match lines: 4
715| || (semantic.common_factors || []).length
724| html += buildSemanticPillGroup('Fatores comuns:', semantic.common_factors || []);
788| ? ((adriana && adriana.main_insights) || [])
791| ? ((adriana && adriana.follow_up_questions) || [])
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 7
5129| 'common_factors' => ['tags' => $commonTagList],
5349| * @return array{common_factors: array{tags: list<string>}, associated_teams: array{tags: list<string>}}
5356| return ['common_factors' => ['tags' => []], 'associated_teams' => ['tags' => []]];
5387| 'common_factors' => ['tags' => $commonTags],
5802| 'common_factors' => [
5854| 'common_factors' => ['tags' => []],
22828| 'common_factors' => $commonFactors,
File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/Chart/ChartAiAnalysisService.php
Match lines: 6
266| // "follow_up_questions": ["pergunta 1", "pergunta 2"],
314| // "follow_up_questions": ["Quais dimensões de diversidade (gênero, etnia, idade, etc.) estão disponíveis para análise?", "Quais são as metas de diversidade estabelecidas pela organização?", "Existem dados históricos para comparação de tendências?"],
338| 'follow_up_questions' => [],
399| \"follow_up_questions\": [\"pergunta 1\", \"pergunta 2\"],
530| 'follow_up_questions' => $response['follow_up_questions'] ?? [],
599| 'follow_up_questions' => [],
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaOccurrenceDashboardAggregator.php
Match lines: 3
957| 'common_factors' => $commonFactors,
1130| $factors = $semantic['common_factors'] ?? [];
1460| $qs[] = !empty($semantic['common_factors']) || !empty($semantic['high_risk_factors'])
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaOccurrenceLlmService.php
Match lines: 3
720|- "common_factors": temas/fatores que aparecem em múltiplos relatos (ex.: "Manobra de ré", "Baixa visibilidade", "Falta de EPI").
728|- Máximo 4 itens em common_factors, high_risk_factors e associated_teams.
738| "common_factors": [{"label": "Fator comum", "count": 1}],
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaOccurrencePanelSectionAnalytics.php
Match lines: 2
150| if (($semantic['high_risk_factors'] ?? []) === [] && ($semantic['common_factors'] ?? []) !== []) {
151| $semantic['high_risk_factors'] = array_slice($semantic['common_factors'], 0, 5);
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaOccurrenceSemanticAnalysisService.php
Match lines: 1
165| 'common_factors' => [],
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaPanelAnalyticsChatService.php
Match lines: 1
317| 'common_factors' => is_array($semantic['common_factors'] ?? null) ? $semantic['common_factors'] : [],
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaPanelSummaryFormatter.php
Match lines: 3
97| $common = is_array($semantic['common_factors'] ?? null) ? $semantic['common_factors'] : [];
236| $common = is_array($semantic['common_factors'] ?? null) ? $semantic['common_factors'] : [];
357| $factors = is_array($semantic['common_factors'] ?? null) ? $semantic['common_factors'] : [];
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaPreventionExecutiveReportBuilder.php
Match lines: 3
725| 'common_factors' => ['tags' => []],
1229| foreach ($semantic['common_factors'] ?? [] as $factor) {
1262| 'common_factors' => [
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaPreventionPanelViewAnalytics.php
Match lines: 2
76| foreach ($semantic['common_factors'] ?? [] as $f) {
123| $semantic['common_factors'] = [];
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaRefusalRightService.php
Match lines: 1
544| 'common_factors' => $this->topCounts($semanticByGmr, 4),
File: templates/people_analytics/chart_detail.html.twig
Match lines: 2
2746| if (analysis.follow_up_questions && analysis.follow_up_questions.length > 0) {
2750| analysis.follow_up_questions.forEach(function(question) {
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig
Match lines: 5
9| {% set _insights = _adriana.main_insights|default([]) %}
10| {% set _questions = _adriana.follow_up_questions|default([]) %}
21| or _semantic.common_factors|default([])|length > 0
68| {% if _semantic.common_factors|default([])|length > 0 %}
71| {% for f in _semantic.common_factors %}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/ocurrence_report/index.html.twig
Match lines: 2
109|{% set page2CommonFactors = unitPatterns.common_factors|default({}) %}
867| {% set commonFactors = reportPatterns.common_factors|default({}) %}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/tabs/panel/_panel_scripts.html.twig
Match lines: 2
1108| (sem.common_factors && sem.common_factors.length) ||
1169| html += inlineGroup('Fatores comuns:', sem.common_factors || [], 'company');
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/tabs/panel/_panel_semantic_adriana.html.twig
Match lines: 4
57| {% if semantic.common_factors|default([])|length > 0 %}
60| {% for f in semantic.common_factors %}
117| {% if semantic.common_factors|default([])|length > 0 %}
120| {% for f in semantic.common_factors %}
File: templates/ssma/prevention/prevention_report/index.html.twig
Match lines: 2
641| {% if unitPatterns.common_factors.tags|default([])|length > 0 %}
643| tags: unitPatterns.common_factors.tags|default([])
File: templates/ssma/prevention/tabs/_tab_prevention_panel.html.twig
Match lines: 2
1690| if (sem.common_factors && sem.common_factors.length) {
1692| sem.common_factors.forEach(function (f) {
File: templates/ssma/refusal/tabs/_tab_panel.html.twig
Match lines: 1
149| {% for f in semantic.common_factors|default([]) %}
File: tests/Service/Ssma/SsmaOccurrenceSemanticAnalysisServiceTest.php
Match lines: 4
25| self::assertNotEmpty($result['common_factors']);
26| self::assertSame('Condição Insegura', $result['common_factors'][0]['label']);
59| array_merge($result['common_factors'] ?? [], $result['high_risk_factors'] ?? [])
86| self::assertSame('Condição Insegura', $result['common_factors'][0]['label']);
File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaOccurrencePanelSectionAnalyticsTest.php
Match lines: 3
41| 'common_factors' => [['label' => 'Condição Insegura', 'count' => 1]],
68| ['total_occurrences' => 3, 'common_factors' => []],
94| $semantic = ['common_factors' => [['label' => 'Condição Insegura', 'count' => 1]]];
File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaPanelSummaryFormatterTest.php
Match lines: 2
80| 'common_factors' => [
207| 'semantic' => ['common_factors' => [['label' => 'Condição Insegura', 'count' => 4]], 'high_risk_factors' => []],
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "ActionView|ssmaApActionView", "use_perl_regexp": true}
Result
File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js
Match lines: 7
2988| function openActionViewOffcanvas(btn) {
3024| if (typeof window.openOffcanvasssmaApActionView === 'function') {
3025| window.openOffcanvasssmaApActionView();
3028| var canvas = document.getElementById('ssmaApActionView-offcanvas-wrapper')
3029| || document.getElementById('ssmaApActionViewOffcanvas');
3034| window.jQuery('#ssmaApActionView').modal('show');
3048| openActionViewOffcanvas(btn);
File: templates/decision_system/risk_intelligence/partials/_behavioral_actions.html.twig
Match lines: 9
1|{% set actionView = behavioral_actions_view|default({}) %}
2|{% set actionPermissions = actionView.permissions|default({}) %}
29| {% for action in actionView.actions|default([]) %}
251| {% for option in actionView.responsible_options|default([]) %}
276| {% for option in actionView.responsible_options|default([]) %}
285| {% for option in actionView.team_options|default([]) %}
293| {% if actionView.company_scope_option is defined and actionView.company_scope_option %}
294| <option value="{{ actionView.company_scope_option.value }}" selected>
295| {{ actionView.company_scope_option.text }}
Request #6
deepseek-v4-flash
P:98.26K C:823 CR:95.23K CW:0
7296ms
Reasoning
Let me check where the offcanvas is rendered with data-ap-detail and whether another JS fills it. Search JS for 'data-ap-detail' and also search where the twig partial is intended. Maybe a JS helper elsewhere fills data-ap-detail fields by fetching detail data from an endpoint (`action-detail`). Also let's search for `querySelectorAll('[data-ap-detail]')` or `[data-ap-detail` in JS.
Also, check SsmaOccurrencePanelSectionAnalytics: `insights` content could be raw text. But given the precedent exists in occurrence panel (`_panel_scripts.html.twig` line 1169 uses inlineGroup with f.label presumably escaped) — we don't have to dig further.
Now important: the review plan says to confirm where the offcanvas id exists. Already confirmed the mismatch. Let me also double check if the offcanvas partial might get included by `_modal_offcanvas.html.twig` via `components/_modal_offcanvas.html.twig`? No, the embed tag is a component definition; it doesn't auto-include. The partial is orphan (file_find found only itself, include search found nothing).
So the conclusion on issue 1 stands. Actually, wait — this could also mean the "Visualizar" button opens an offcanvas from a *different* existing component? Search in templates for element id `ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas` (only in partial). For `data-action-id` opening something? The JS bindTableViewButtons binds a click that calls openActionViewOffcanvas; openActionViewOffcanvas targets ids that don't exist; so visually nothing happens. That's a HIGH functional bug.
Hmm, but the partial itself could be intended to be included in the tab action plan view — for the Actions tab's own "Visualizar" (eye) action. Let me search where the existing action plan table "view" opens a modal/offcanvas. Search for 'ssmaActionPlanView' broadly or `_modal_action_view`? Not necessary: the mismatch claim holds regardless.
Let me look at `_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig` file more carefully: it embeds a `_modal_offcanvas.html.twig` and defines fields data-ap-detail. This looks like a detail viewer for a row; presumably the accompanying JS would fetch the action detail (from an endpoint returning these fields) and fill the data-ap-detail spans. But that JS is absent from the PR; instead `action_plan_panel.js` fills a different, non-existent set of ids. So either the panel's "Visualizar" should reuse this offcanvas partial with a different population function (e.g. from AJAX GET action endpoint returning those fields) — but there's no JS in this PR that does that.
Let me verify: is there any other JS file in the project that queries `[data-ap-detail]`? Search.
Tool Calls (3)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "data-ap-detail", "file_patterns": ["public/js/"]}
Result
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "openActionViewOffcanvas|bindTableViewButtons|js-ssma-ap-panel-view-action", "use_perl_regexp": true}
Result
File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js
Match lines: 7
917| + '<button type="button" class="ssma-ap-panel-table-action-btn js-ssma-ap-panel-view-action"'
950| bindTableViewButtons();
2988| function openActionViewOffcanvas(btn) {
3041| function bindTableViewButtons() {
3046| root.querySelectorAll('.js-ssma-ap-panel-view-action').forEach(function (btn) {
3048| openActionViewOffcanvas(btn);
3070| bindTableViewButtons();
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel.html.twig
Match lines: 1
516| class="ssma-ap-panel-table-action-btn js-ssma-ap-panel-view-action"
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "ssmaApPanelSetPeriod|ssmaAskAdrianaPanelQuestion|switchChatContext", "use_perl_regexp": true}
Result
File: docs/adriana-cognitive-layer/MANUAL-TEST-PLAN.md
Match lines: 5
173|| **Contexto de ferramenta** | Clicar opção em "Criação" ou `switchChatContext('Projetos')` | Barra `#toolHeader`, `#toolName` |
341|1. No modal, clicar **"Criar um novo Projeto"** (ou executar no console: `switchChatContext('Projetos')`).
500|**Pré-condição:** `switchChatContext('Guia')` ou contexto Guia ativo.
531|1. `switchChatContext('Projetos')`.
663|**Pré-condição:** permissão SSMA + `switchChatContext('Módulo de Segurança')` se necessário.
File: docs/adriana-cognitive-layer/topics/SSMA.md
Match lines: 1
53|| Contexto SSMA | `switchChatContext('Módulo de Segurança')` se necessário | |
File: docs/ssma/FLUXO-ADRIANA-ULTIMOS-AJUSTES-JUL-2026.md
Match lines: 1
124| ssmaAskAdrianaPanelQuestion(q, context)
File: public/js/chat_ia/chat_ia_modal.js
Match lines: 2
11277|if (typeof window.switchChatContext !== "function") {
11278| window.switchChatContext = async function switchChatContext(toolName, toolLogoSrc = null) {
File: public/js/chat_ia/chat_markers_integration.js
Match lines: 2
185| if (typeof window.switchChatContext === 'function') {
206| window.switchChatContext(toolName, toolLogoSrc);
File: public/js/governance/governance-cases-dashboard.js
Match lines: 2
292| if (typeof window.switchChatContext === 'function') {
293| window.switchChatContext('Central de Governança');
File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js
Match lines: 7
2926| if (!window.ssmaAskAdrianaPanelQuestion) {
2927| window.ssmaAskAdrianaPanelQuestion = function (question, context) {
2938| if (typeof window.switchChatContext === 'function') {
2939| window.switchChatContext('Módulo de Segurança');
2981| if (!question || typeof window.ssmaAskAdrianaPanelQuestion !== 'function') {
2984| window.ssmaAskAdrianaPanelQuestion(question, context);
3140| window.ssmaApPanelSetPeriod = function (value) {
File: templates/decision_system/tabs/_dashboard_payroll.html.twig
Match lines: 2
2189| if (typeof window.switchChatContext === 'function') {
2190| window.switchChatContext('Orquestrador de Operações');
File: templates/new_home/partials/_home_hero.html.twig
Match lines: 2
373| if (typeof window.switchChatContext === "function") {
374| await window.switchChatContext(mappedToolName, logoSrc);
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/tabs/panel/_panel_semantic_adriana.html.twig
Match lines: 8
287| if (!window.ssmaAskAdrianaPanelQuestion) {
288| window.ssmaAskAdrianaPanelQuestion = function (question, context) {
296| if (typeof window.switchChatContext === 'function') {
297| window.switchChatContext('Módulo de Segurança');
321| // switchChatContext podem limpar window.ssmaPanelChatContext no meio.
346| if (typeof window.ssmaAskAdrianaPanelQuestion === 'function') {
347| window.ssmaAskAdrianaPanelQuestion(feedQ, feedCtx);
356| window.ssmaAskAdrianaPanelQuestion(q, ctx);
Request #7
deepseek-v4-flash
P:100.18K C:2.55K CR:99.07K CW:0
19851ms
Reasoning
Confirmed: `openActionViewOffcanvas` and `bindTableViewButtons` only in action_plan_panel.js; no `[data-ap-detail]` consumer JS exists anywhere; the offcanvas partial is orphan.
Now, is `openActionViewOffcanvas` referencing IDs matching a template that exists somewhere else — like in `_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig`? No. The JS target IDs (`ssma-ap-action-view-title`, etc.) don't exist anywhere. So the visualizar flow is broken in this PR as merged — the offcanvas partial provided in this PR doesn't match.
Wait, maybe the partial was expected to be included in `_tab_painel.html.twig` but omitted by mistake; and the JS to fill the data-ap-detail fields is missing. Either way it's a bug to report. Good.
Let me now check issue: the JS embedded JSON uses `panel|json_encode|raw`. Let's verify the content includes user-entered strings (row titles etc.). panel includes table rows with row.title, management, location, description etc. Those come from DB user content. The template script tag `application/json`; with PHP json_encode default slash escaping, `</script>` won't appear. But to be safe, many projects still escape `<`. Since it's a widely used pattern in the codebase (many places `|json_encode|raw`), plus precedent for `json_encode(15)` in effectiveness/leadership for user rows, I'd downgrade this to a low/medium suggestion at most, or skip. Given the user rule "avoid commenting on correct code", and that PHP escapes slashes, the risk is mostly theoretical via `<!--`. I'll include as a LOW/medium with accurate wording: use JSON_HEX_TAG for robustness in consistency with other modules. Actually the review plan explicitly numbered it as #2 high. But my job is to confirm issues, not to blindly copy the plan. Given the technical reality, I'll downgrade and phrase carefully.
Hmm, but let me double check Twig json_encode behavior: In Twig (Symfony), the `json_encode` filter does have default `options = 0`? Let me recall twig/core-extension: `final function twig_jsonencode_filter($value, $options = 0)`. Actually the function signature might be `$options = 0`, but wait: In Twig 2, `twig_jsonencode_filter($value, $options = 0)`. I believe default is 0. So slash escaping is on. Also the docs mention "To avoid XSS, you should escape this with the html filter or use the JSON_HEX_* options".
Actually there is a known Twig note: The json_encode filter "does not escape `<`, `>`, `&`, `'` and `"` by default" so for embedding in HTML script, recommended to use `json_encode(hex)` or apply `escape('js')`? Right.
Given `</script>` can't appear because `/` is escaped by PHP as `\/`. So main breakout is minimal. But `<!--` still possible: In script data state, encountering `<!--` switches to "script data escaped" state where `</script>` detection is different: In escaped state, `</script>` alone does NOT close; the parser requires `</script>` only in "script data" or "script data double escaped". Wait, in escaped state, when it sees `</script>`? Let me recall the HTML tokenizer script states:
- Script data state: `</script>` ends the element.
- Script data escaped state: entered by `<!--`. In this state, `</script>` would cause... Actually in script data escaped state, seeing `</script` followed by appropriate char? The spec: In "script data escaped state", the `-` handling transitions; `<` goes to "script data escaped less-than sign state"; `/` then to "script data escaped end tag name state", which requires an ASCII alpha... So `</script>` in escaped state IS handled as an end tag? Actually let me think: script data escaped state handles `</` by going through end tag open states similar to normal; yes, it treats `</script>` as closing. Hmm, but there's also "double escaped" state for nested `<script>` inside. The difference: In escaped state, `<!--` content contains `</script>` that... Wait, the classic XSS bypass `<script> var x = "<!--"; ... </script>` is about double-escaped state? The known attack: `<!--` opens escaped state; then `</script>` inside escaped state doesn't close the element unless you provide a matching `-->`? Honestly, the HTML spec in "script data escaped" state: end tags ARE recognized normally? Let me check memory: In script data escaped state, transitions:
- `-` → script data escaped dash state
- `<` → script data escaped less-than sign state
- otherwise → reconsume in script data escaped state
In script data escaped less-than sign state: `/` → script data escaped end tag open state. In end tag open: matching name → end tag. So `</script>` is recognized as closing even in escaped state. So no extra risk? Actually the risk for `<!--` inside script JSON is the double-escaped state when it sees `<script` inside. The primary recommendation (OWASP) remains: escape `<` as `\u003C` to avoid `</script>` and `<!--` issues entirely. But the concrete exploitable breakout requires literal `</script>` which is slash-escaped.
Given the codebase precedent and PHP behavior, I'll flag it as LOW (defense-in-depth) and NOT as high/critical. Hmm. But many security reviewers still flag this as standard because templating engines other than PHP (e.g., Twig with JSON_UNESCAPED_SLASHES) might differ; but the code here is clearly Symfony/PHP Twig. I'll go with low priority.
Let me finalize the set of comments. Need to decide which to report with `code_comment`. Let me choose the most valuable and accurate ones:
1. HIGH: Broken "Visualizar" offcanvas contract in action_plan_panel.js (openActionViewOffcanvas targeting nonexistent IDs / orphan offcanvas partial with data-ap-detail). Anchor to lines around function openActionViewOffcanvas in the JS diff.
2. MEDIUM: `_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig` orphan partial is never included (only referenced by itself); confirm maybe include intended in _tab_painel or _tab_action_plan. Anchor in the twig file at top block. This overlaps with #1; I can combine into one comment, but since they are separate files, maybe comment on each file separately? Better to place the primary bug comment in JS (since the button is there) and mention that the partial is not included. Alternatively place one comment at the button render + one at the offcanvas partial. To keep concise: put comment at `openActionViewOffcanvas` in JS; mention the partial defines fields by data-ap-detail and is not included anywhere.
Actually code_comment locates comments per file. I can add comments to multiple files. Keep it to two comments max for this single bug? Let me put one detailed comment in the JS and one in the twig partial to help the author.
3. MEDIUM: Insights raw injection — both in JS `buildAdrianaInsightsHtml` (item inserted unescaped) and twig `{{ insight|raw }}`. Since insight text is AI-generated but may echo user-provided fields, escaping not guaranteed. I'll flag the JS one (buildAdrianaInsightsHtml) as the primary and mention twig counterpart. Severity medium. Actually is the insight content considered trusted? The twig partial counterpart uses `|raw`, meaning the author intends to inject markup (e.g., `<strong>`) — but AI output could contain arbitrary HTML. Recommend sanitizing at the backend or using plain text. Medium.
4. LOW/MEDIUM: html2canvas double loading: static script include + lazy loader. Anchor at _tab_painel.html.twig bottom line 594.
5. MEDIUM maintainability: monolithic JS with duplication (updateKpiRow/updateOverviewKpiRow near-identical; re-implementing occurrence panel patterns) + 1250 lines CSS. Anchor where duplication is evident — maybe in JS at updateOverviewKpiRow; severity low/medium maintainability.
6. LOW: `var` instead of let/const in new file.
7. LOW: dead code resetCustomSelect + orphan CSS for semantic overview columns (ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns/item not present in markup). Anchor comment at the CSS definition around line 416-440. Also resetCustomSelect at JS.
Let me also decide about #2 (JSON raw) and #6 (origin_url): I'll include JSON one as LOW with clear reasoning (consistency/defense), skip origin_url (since backend origin_url likely internal route and there's no proof it's user-controlled; over-reporting would be bad). Actually the plan flagged low. Let me quickly check if there's a PHP presenter building origin_url... code_search 'origin_url' only found JS and nothing in src — meaning the backend maybe not present (other changed files?). Not in review scope anyway; the backend files are "other changed files" empty. The data model may not exist in this checkout for those routes. Skip.
Now, let me confirm the `_tab_painel.html.twig` static html2canvas script at line 594 and confirm JS lazy loader duplicates. Yes both present.
Let me also double-check the offcanvas partial include: maybe `_modal_offcanvas.html.twig` is registered for all modals? No — embed is a standalone template that must be included to render. Confirmed orphan. But maybe there is another action-plan "view" that needs it — but the code_search didn't find any include. So it's orphan within this PR — and the Visualizar offcanvas in the panel doesn't exist. Since I want to be accurate about "partial not included anywhere", I can place a comment on the partial file noting it is not included; and the JS references ids that don't exist.
Wait: One more consideration. Could `openActionViewOffcanvas` be intended to work only when the twig partial is included in some other page (not the painel)? But `bindTableViewButtons` binds click on `.js-ssma-ap-panel-view-action` inside dashboard root, only present in painel tab. Since painel does not include the offcanvas partial, nothing renders. Confirmed bug within painel.
Let me verify there's not an offcanvas markup hidden at bottom of `_tab_painel.html.twig` (lines 595+?). The file ends at 595 per diff (+595 lines). Let me read tail of _tab_painel to see the full file around 570-595.
Also read JS around lines 2988-3055 for exact content of openActionViewOffcanvas (already shown in diff). Good.
Let me read _tab_painel tail.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel.html.twig", "start_line": 560, "end_line": 595}
Result
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel.html.twig (Total lines: 596)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 560-595
560| lengthChange: true,
561| language: {
562| emptyTable: 'Nenhuma ação encontrada.',
563| zeroRecords: 'Nenhuma ação corresponde aos filtros.',
564| info: 'Mostrando _END_ de _TOTAL_ ações',
565| infoEmpty: 'Mostrando 0 de 0 ações',
566| lengthMenu: 'Resultados por página _MENU_',
567| paginate: { previous: '<', next: '>' }
568| }
569| }
570| } %}
571| </div>
572| </div>
573|
574| {% include 'ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig' with {
575| view_mode: 'pendencias',
576| semantic: panel_semantic,
577| adriana: panel_adriana,
578| context: 'action_plan',
579| row_id: 'ssma-ap-semantic-adriana-pendencias'
580| } %}
581| </div>
582|
583| <div data-ap-panel-view="visao_geral" class="d-none">
584| {% include 'ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig' %}
585| </div>
586|
587| <div data-ap-panel-view="comparativo" class="d-none">
588| <div class="ssma-ap-view-placeholder" id="ssma-ap-comparativo-root">
589| Comparativo entre unidades — carregando dados…
590| </div>
591| </div>
592|</div>
593|
594|<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/html2canvas/1.4.1/html2canvas.min.js"></script>
595|<script src="{{ asset('js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js') }}"></script>
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig", "start_line": 1, "end_line": 12}
Result
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig (Total lines: 261)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-12
1|{% embed 'components/_modal_offcanvas.html.twig' with {
2| modal_id: 'ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas',
3| modal_width: '560px',
4| no_backdrop: true
5|} %}
6| {% block modal_title %}
7| Detalhes da ação
8| {% endblock %}
9|
10| {% block modal_body %}
11| <div class="ssma-ap-action-details" id="ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvasBody">
12| <section class="ssma-ap-action-details-section">
Request #8
deepseek-v4-flash
P:103.4K C:165 CR:102.66K CW:0
2072ms
Reasoning
Confirmed. `_tab_painel.html.twig` doesn't include the offcanvas partial. The offcanvas partial is orphaned within this PR.
Now let me look at how `openActionViewOffcanvas` is structured in the JS to anchor the comment. From the diff, JS lines ~2988-3052. Let me view that region.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 3055, "file_path": "public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js", "start_line": 2988}
Result
File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js (Total lines: 3154)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 2988-3055
2988| function openActionViewOffcanvas(btn) {
2989| var title = btn.getAttribute('data-action-title') || 'Ação';
2990| var origin = btn.getAttribute('data-action-origin') || '—';
2991| var deadline = btn.getAttribute('data-action-deadline') || '—';
2992| var pending = btn.getAttribute('data-action-pending') || '—';
2993| var description = btn.getAttribute('data-action-description') || 'Sem descrição.';
2994| var originUrl = btn.getAttribute('data-action-origin-url') || '';
2995| var executors = btn.getAttribute('data-action-executors') || '—';
2996| var validators = btn.getAttribute('data-action-validators') || '—';
2997| var id = btn.getAttribute('data-action-id') || '';
2998|
2999| var setText = function (elId, value) {
3000| var el = document.getElementById(elId);
3001| if (el) {
3002| el.textContent = value;
3003| }
3004| };
3005| setText('ssma-ap-action-view-title', title);
3006| setText('ssma-ap-action-view-id', id ? ('#' + id) : '');
3007| setText('ssma-ap-action-view-origin', origin);
3008| setText('ssma-ap-action-view-executors', executors || '—');
3009| setText('ssma-ap-action-view-validators', validators || '—');
3010| setText('ssma-ap-action-view-deadline', deadline);
3011| setText('ssma-ap-action-view-pending', pending);
3012| setText('ssma-ap-action-view-description', description);
3013|
3014| var originLink = document.getElementById('ssma-ap-action-view-origin-link');
3015| if (originLink) {
3016| if (originUrl) {
3017| originLink.href = originUrl;
3018| originLink.classList.remove('d-none');
3019| } else {
3020| originLink.classList.add('d-none');
3021| }
3022| }
3023|
3024| if (typeof window.openOffcanvasssmaApActionView === 'function') {
3025| window.openOffcanvasssmaApActionView();
3026| return;
3027| }
3028| var canvas = document.getElementById('ssmaApActionView-offcanvas-wrapper')
3029| || document.getElementById('ssmaApActionViewOffcanvas');
3030| if (!canvas) {
3031| return;
3032| }
3033| if (window.jQuery) {
3034| window.jQuery('#ssmaApActionView').modal('show');
3035| return;
3036| }
3037| canvas.classList.add('show');
3038| canvas.style.visibility = 'visible';
3039| }
3040|
3041| function bindTableViewButtons() {
3042| var root = getRoot();
3043| if (!root) {
3044| return;
3045| }
3046| root.querySelectorAll('.js-ssma-ap-panel-view-action').forEach(function (btn) {
3047| btn.addEventListener('click', function () {
3048| openActionViewOffcanvas(btn);
3049| });
3050| });
3051| }
3052|
3053| function onPainelTabVisible() {
3054| if (initialized) {
3055| switchView(currentView);
Request #9
deepseek-v4-flash
P:104.44K C:5.31K CR:103.55K CW:0
38981ms
Reasoning
Confirmed. The JS fills fields with IDs like `ssma-ap-action-view-title`, which don't exist anywhere; the offcanvas partial that this PR introduces has `data-ap-detail` fields and its id `ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas`; and the partial is never included in any template.
Now let me pick the exact code snippets (newly added lines) for each comment so the tool can anchor them:
Comment 1 (JS) anchor:
```
+ setText('ssma-ap-action-view-title', title);
```
Include a couple lines.
Comment 1b (twig offcanvas) anchor:
```
+{% embed 'components/_modal_offcanvas.html.twig' with {
+ modal_id: 'ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas',
```
Could place here the orphan note. Maybe better to place in the partial. Yes.
Comment 2: insights raw — anchor in JS buildAdrianaInsightsHtml:
```
+ return insights.map(function (item) {
+ return '<li>' + item + '</li>';
+ }).join('');
```
In twig partial: `{{ insight|raw }}`. I'll comment on JS and mention the twig counterpart.
Comment 3: html2canvas duplicate — anchor at `_tab_painel.html.twig` line:
```
+<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/html2canvas/1.4.1/html2canvas.min.js"></script>
```
Comment 4: maintainability duplication (JS updateKpiRow vs updateOverviewKpiRow) — anchor at `function updateKpiRow`? Both near. Choose one and mention duplication + file size. Might comment severity low/medium.
Comment 5: JSON embed XSS — anchor at `_tab_painel.html.twig`:
```
+ <script type="application/json" id="ssma-ap-panel-data-json">{{ panel|json_encode|raw }}</script>
```
Phrase with accuracy: PHP json_encode escapes `/` so `</script>` becomes `<\/script>`, but this is a common defense-in-depth; note that other modules use json_encode(15) (JSON_HEX_TAG...). Actually hold on — if it's genuinely safe, should I flag? The main residual risk is minimal; but because `panel` includes user content and gets echoed into HTML without hex, some security scanners flag it; but also many existing templates do same. I'm somewhat hesitant. The rule says "avoid commenting on correct code." Since PHP slash escaping makes the `</script>` breakout not directly exploitable, but JSON block still could break on `<!--` sequences? Let's think more concretely about the exploit path with `<!--`:
HTML parser: Script data state. If a literal `<!--` appears in the JSON text (inside string), the tokenizer transitions to "script data escaped state". In the escaped state, the tokenizer treats `</script>` NOT as end tag? Let's check spec:
Script data escaped state:
- U+002D (-) → dash state
- U+003C (<) → less-than sign state
- EOF → parse error, emit EOF (treat as end)
- anything else → append, stay
Script data escaped less-than sign state:
- U+002F (/) → end tag open state
- ASCII alpha → script data double escape start state
- anything else → back to escaped state
So after `<!--`, if attacker text contains `</script>` (impossible because of slash escaping) — but what about `<script`? In escaped less-than sign state, if next char is ASCII alpha (e.g., 's'), it goes to "double escape start" state; for `script` followed by space, `/`, `>` → it enters "double escaped" state. In double escaped state, `</script>` DOES NOT close (it would exit the double escaped state back to escaped state). To close the script element from the double escaped state, you need to go back to normal script data state (via `</script>` in escaped state) and then close with another `</script>`. So a `<!--` inside is generally not a safe bypass by itself — it's still complex. The main robust vector remains literal `</script>`, which PHP escapes. So actual risk is very low. I'll go LOW and phrase about hardening for consistency, or skip.
Given "Strict focus on objective", I'll include it as low with honest framing (not claiming exploitable break). Actually, the review plan explicitly lists it high; my verification shows it's most likely not exploitable in PHP because of slash escaping... but wait — I need to be extra careful: PHP json_encode escapes forward slashes ONLY when `JSON_UNESCAPED_SLASHES` is not provided. But Twig json_encode filter might pass options. Let me recall Twig filter json_encode signature and whether Twig passes `JSON_HEX_TAG` default.
I recall Twig's `json_encode` filter's PHP implementation, in `Twig\Extension\CoreExtension`:
```php
public function encodeJson($value, $options = 0)
{
$options |= JSON_UNESCAPED_SLASHES; // ???
```
Hmm! Actually there is something: Twig 3.x `json_encode` default added `JSON_UNESCAPED_SLASHES`? Let me remember. In Symfony docs there's a filter `json_encode` that says "It accepts the same arguments as the PHP json_encode function." Twig's `twig_jsonencode_filter`:
```php
function twig_jsonencode_filter($value, $options = 0)
{
if ($options & JSON_PRETTY_PRINT) {
$options |= JSON_UNESCAPED_SLASHES;
}
return json_encode($value, $options);
}
```
Yes! I now recall: Twig only adds JSON_UNESCAPED_SLASHES when JSON_PRETTY_PRINT is set. Default options=0 → slashes ARE escaped by PHP's default. So `</script>` → `<\/script>`. OK so it's safe.
But is there a Twig version that by default uses `JSON_HEX_TAG|JSON_HEX_AMP|JSON_HEX_APOS|JSON_HEX_QUOT`? Some versions of Twig (older, e.g., 1.x?) — Actually there was a change where Twig filter json_encode applied hex options when rendering inside `<script>`? No, that was part of the `json_encode` filter for the `html` strategy? Not really.
I'll go with LOW severity for the JSON script (defense-in-depth + consistency with existing `json_encode(15)` in effectiveness templates). Hmm, but is effectiveness for the same module (SSMA) with `json_encode(15)`? Yes `templates/ssma/effectiveness/index.html.twig` uses `json_encode(15)` for `dashboard_action_rows` inside application/json. That shows that within the same module there's an established pattern of hex-escaping JSON blocks that embed user content. So the comment has support. Low/medium. I'll make it LOW.
Let me now decide the final set of comments. I should avoid too many (the task says concise). I'll produce about 7-8 comments targeted at the strongest confirmed issues:
1. **HIGH (JS + twig)** — offcanvas viewer never renders / fields mismatch. Two separate files: put main comment in JS `openActionViewOffcanvas`; optionally second in partial. I'll do one comment in JS and one in the offcanvas twig partial (both useful). But that is effectively one issue duplicated; better keep one comment only to remain focused, anchored in JS, referencing the partial by path. Actually anchoring in the partial file may help author locate the orphan. I'll add comments to both files but concise.
Hmm, the guidance: "Review every file individually" — yes we must pass over each file. Let's plan comments per file:
- `public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js`:
- HIGH: offcanvas mismatch (openActionViewOffcanvas).
- MEDIUM: unescaped insight HTML (buildAdrianaInsightsHtml).
- LOW: `var` everywhere (style). Possibly skip because it's huge; but as low priority short comment allowed.
- LOW: dead code resetCustomSelect (no callers). Also `mergePanelData`? it's used. Fine.
- MEDIUM/LOW maintainability duplication: updateKpiRow vs updateOverviewKpiRow.
- `templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel.html.twig`:
- MEDIUM: html2canvas duplicate static load.
- LOW: json_encode hex.
- `templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig`:
- HIGH: orphan/mismatch.
- `public/css/ssma/action_plan_panel.css`:
- LOW: orphan semantic overview rules + huge size.
- `templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig`:
- MEDIUM: `{{ insight|raw }}` without sanitization — same insight issue; combine there as twig side.
- `templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig`:
- check something: uses `action_item.responsible_ids|default([]))[0]`... `(action_item.responsible_ids|default([]))[0]|default(0)` — Twig: indexing on empty array gives null? Using `[0]` on an array not in Twig throws? In Twig, `arr[0]` on empty array returns null? Actually Twig `[0]` on empty array returns null (no error). And then `|default(0)` handles null. OK.
- macro avatar colors: `avatar_colors[color_index % avatar_colors|length]` — operator precedence: `color_index % (avatar_colors|length)`? In Twig `%` vs `|length`: filter has high precedence; `avatar_colors|length` will be applied first, then modulo. `color_index % avatar_colors|length` parses as `color_index % (avatar_colors|length)`? Twig operator precedence: filters bind tighter than binary operators, so `color_index % (avatar_colors|length)`. Good.
- Any other issue? `member_by_id[executor_key] is defined` — array key defined check, ok. It's fine.
- `templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig`:
- any issue? Possibly the fallback bar chart etc. Not really. DataTable for overview table has paging false but server paginates with its own footer — intentional.
- `templates/ssma/action_plan/index.html.twig`:
- adds style with `:has` — fine.
Let me also check whether there is a real bug: In JS `buildFilterParams`, the unidade param duplication logic; not major.
One more possible actual bug in JS: `renderCriticalChart` uses `destroyChart('critical')` then `charts.critical = ...`. Fine.
`updateKpiRow` when cards exist: it looks for cards = row.querySelectorAll('.mhs-card'). The SSR row initial contains 4 cards. On filter update, only 4 KPIs expected. OK.
The `formatEvolutionLabel` with `<br/>` for array labels while using Highcharts labels with useHTML true: `xAxis.labels.useHTML: true`; with `<br/>` join, fine.
`getOverviewPaginationPages` with maxButtons=7: for middle pages, pages 1, …, current-1..current+1, …, last — max total pages = 1+1+3+1+1 = 7. OK. For `currentPage <= half` where half=3, pages 1..5, ellipsis, totalPages. That's 7 items. But if totalPages==8 and currentPage==1, half=3, 1..5 + ellipsis + 8 = 7 items, good. CurrentPage==4: middle branch → 1, ellipsis, 3,4,5, ellipsis, 8 = 7. Good.
But edge: if totalPages is e.g. 8 and currentPage==3, currentPage<=half (3<=3) → pages 1..5 then ellipsis, 8. good.
`updateOverviewPagination`: uses `container.getAttribute('data-last-page')`. fine.
Another possible issue: overview data initially from `panel.overview` etc. In applyOverviewDom, uses data-per-page etc. fine.
What about `bindAdrianaQuestions` defines global `window.ssmaAskAdrianaPanelQuestion`... only used if not defined by occurrence panel. If occurrence panel defined first with slightly different behavior maybe fine.
Alright. Also verify JS anchor snippets precisely as they appear in the diff for code_comment existing_code matching.
For the JS file the diff is a new file; the snippet must match lines exactly (with indentation 4 spaces inside functions? Actually file uses 4-space indentation inside the IIFE at top-level functions? Let's check: The code shows lines like:
```
function openActionViewOffcanvas(btn) {
```
4 spaces indent. Wait, file top-level functions at 4 spaces: the IIFE is `(function (window, document) {` and then `'use strict';`; functions at 4 spaces indentation like ` function getRoot()`. Yes.
The diff text in the provided snippet is exactly the file content. So I can use code lines from it.
Let me now construct comment 1 anchored at `setText('ssma-ap-action-view-title', title);` lines 3005-3012 and note also the open functions.
I'll build comments in code_comment tool with multiple items.
Let me also confirm severity choices.
For the XSS insight: is it high? The insight strings are generated server-side by AI but can include content derived from user-provided text (occurrence descriptions/action titles). Rendering them raw without sanitization in both the initial SSR (Twig) and updates (JS) is a risk. However, AI text typically comes from LLM that returns text, not necessarily HTML; but markup generated may include `**bold**`? They insert raw to allow styled content. The XSS depends on whether an attacker can influence the LLM output to include arbitrary HTML. This is plausible prompt-injection from occurrence fields (user-entered). I'd rate medium.
For the offcanvas bug: clicking Visualizar does nothing — user can't view details. Functional break = high.
Let me also add a comment about the mismatch in SSR button attributes? The server-rendered table in _tab_painel uses only data-action-id (line 516); openActionViewOffcanvas reads other attributes defaulting to '—'. But since offcanvas never opens, moot. Not needed.
Now check anchors for each:
JS comment - openActionViewOffcanvas:
existing_code snippet lines:
```
setText('ssma-ap-action-view-title', title);
setText('ssma-ap-action-view-id', id ? ('#' + id) : '');
```
These are newly added lines in file.
JS insights:
```
return insights.map(function (item) {
return '<li>' + item + '</li>';
}).join('');
```
JS duplication:
```
function updateOverviewKpiRow(indicators) {
```
Mention near-identical to updateKpiRow plus file size. Or anchor at `var PENDENCIAS_CHART_KEYS`? choose `function updateOverviewKpiRow`.
JS var style:
```
var COLORS = {
```
Anchor top? Better choose a spot: `var charts = {};`. Add low.
JS dead code:
```
function resetCustomSelect(selectId, defaultLabel) {
```
_tab_painel html2canvas:
```
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/html2canvas/1.4.1/html2canvas.min.js"></script>
```
_tab_painel json:
```
<script type="application/json" id="ssma-ap-panel-data-json">{{ panel|json_encode|raw }}</script>
```
offcanvas twig orphan:
```
{% embed 'components/_modal_offcanvas.html.twig' with {
modal_id: 'ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas',
```
But wait, to make "orphan partial" comment I should ensure statement accurate: it is never included by any template in the repo. Already verified via code_search (only file itself). Good.
semantic adriana twig raw:
```
<li>{{ insight|raw }}</li>
```
CSS orphan semantic columns:
```
#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns {
```
Also mention @container.
Number of comments: I think we should limit to key issues to stay concise, but user rules ask to review each file. I'll submit around 9 comments across files.
Let me reconsider "var" comment — user-specific rules list "Variable Declarations: Using var is strictly prohibited; use let or const". However the file is written in an IIFE ES5 style with var everywhere; the author may follow legacy pattern. Since the project JS in ssma uses var heavily (occurrence panel scripts etc.). The codebase rule from the linter says var prohibited. But existing ssma scripts use var? The requirement says new JS should follow. Many of the existing ssma scripts (e.g. _panel_scripts.twig uses `var`). Because legacy uses var, the mandatory rule likely applies to newer TS/ES. Hmm, given these are legacy-style IIFEs with `'use strict'; var`, consistent with surrounding code (other files use `var`). I'll mark as low style and suggest aligning with repo lint; keep short.
Now the maintainability "monolithic JS" comment: The file is 3153 lines of new code; user rule #1: duplicated logic across modules has greatest weight; extract helpers. updateKpiRow and updateOverviewKpiRow are duplicates within the same file (approx 50 lines each). Good objective comment. severity low/medium maintainability. I'll set medium.
CSS 1250 lines also large; combine with orphan CSS comment.
Also should I flag the JSON `|raw` inside `<script type="application/json">` at high? I decided low. Let me phrase: "O bloco embute o JSON do painel (que contém títulos/descrições de ações digitados pelo usuário) direto no HTML com |raw. No PHP o json_encode escapa barras, então a sequência `</script>` não costuma quebrar o bloco, mas outros módulos SSMA já usam `json_encode(15)`/JSON_HEX_TAG ao embutir dados de usuário em application/json (effectiveness/leadership_evaluation) para eliminar qualquer risco de quebra por `</script>`/`<!--`. Recomenda-se adotar o mesmo padrão aqui."
Wait — need to double check json_encode(15) in `leadership_evaluation/index.html.twig` line 52 uses `json_encode(15)`. And effectiveness `json_encode(15)`. So within repo SSMA, there's precedent. Good.
Now `origin_url`: skip as uncertain (no backend reference to confirm external user input). Actually, wait: the JS builds `<a href="...' origin_url ...">`. The origin_url likely points to the occurrence view etc., built by PHP. Skip.
Additionally, maybe I should review `_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig` for a bug: avatar_colors indexing `avatar_colors[color_index % avatar_colors|length]`. In Twig, `%` operator and filter precedence: `a % b|length` => `a % (b|length)` because filters have higher precedence than arithmetic. Good. And macro invoked with `color_index=0` and `1`. Good.
But there's a subtle issue: `{% set validator_id = action_item.validator_member_id|default(action_item.validator_id|default(0)) %}` If validator_member_id is null, default won't kick in because default only applies when value is undefined or null? Twig default handles undefined variables and null? `default` applies when the value is undefined or evaluates to false? Actually Twig's `default` filter replaces the value only when it's undefined (strict) or evaluates to false (in non-strict context: "the default filter returns the passed default value if the value is undefined or empty. ... empty is defined by the empty test"). Actually `default` returns default when the variable is undefined OR empty (false, null, '', etc.). Hmm: "The default filter returns the passed default value if the value is undefined or empty, otherwise the value." Wait — for `var|default('x')`, if var is defined and not empty, returns var; else default. Since validator_member_id could be 0 meaning unset; then default(0) is 0. Then validator_key = validator_id ? ... → empty. fine.
But hold on: executor_id = `(action_item.responsible_ids|default([]))[0]|default(0)`. If responsible_ids is an empty array, then `[0]` yields? In Twig, accessing `[0]` on an empty array throws? Actually Twig's `[` subscript on array with missing key: In non-strict mode it returns null without error? Let me recall: Twig attribute access returns null when the key is missing? Actually `foo['bar']` when foo has no 'bar' returns null if `strict_variables` false (default). So `[0]` on empty array returns null; then `|default(0)` returns 0. Fine.
That macro: uses `asset('uploads/photos/' ~ member_photo)`; elsewhere they use `shared.uploadsPhotosBase`. Fine.
Let me also check `_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig` insights: For `visao_geral` mode, `_insights` from adriana.main_insights; else adriana.insights. When `_no_data` false but insights length == 0 and questions length ==0? For pendencias default both lists empty when _no_data false? If summary/ factors exist but insights empty, they show `<li style=...>{{ _empty_body }}</li>`? Actually structure: `{% else %}` branch shows `<ol ... data-ap-adriana-insights>` with for loop; else clause inside for (insights empty) shows `_empty_body` li. But questions col will also show list empty. Wait if `_no_data` false (semantic present) but insights/questions empty, the top-level if goes to else branch, then questions col shows "As perguntas aparecerão..." because `_questions|length == 0` inside else? Actually the else branch for questions is `{% else %}` of `_no_data and _questions|length == 0`? The condition is `{% if _no_data and _questions|length == 0 %}` so if not no_data but no questions, goes to else and renders empty grid. That leaves the questions title with no cards; minor UI, not bug.
Now, the more important: when insights do exist, `{{ insight|raw }}`. Let me verify backend building the insight may embed HTML intentionally with `<strong>` tags but might come from the LLM; sanitization unknown. Because the partial mirrors occurrence panel where the same raw was used presumably, I'll flag medium on JS + twig but note risk.
Let me check how `_panel_semantic_adriana.html.twig` in occurrence renders insights (raw or escaped) for parity. Search 'insights' in that partial. Might quickly read snippet.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["templates/ssma/occurrence/tabs/panel/_panel_semantic_adriana.html.twig"], "search_text": "insight"}
Result
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/tabs/panel/_panel_semantic_adriana.html.twig
Match lines: 9
1|{# Análise semântica + Insights da Adriana (Painel de Ocorrências) #}
12| : 'Registre ocorrências para que a Adriana possa identificar padrões, fatores comuns e insights automáticos.' %}
225| Insights da Adriana
229| title="Insights gerados automaticamente com base nos dados do painel filtrado."
247| <div class="ssma-adriana-insights-col">
248| {% if _noData and adriana.insights|default([])|length == 0 %}
255| <ol class="ssma-panel-adriana-insights ssma-adriana-insights-list mb-0">
256| {% for insight in adriana.insights|default([]) %}
257| <li>{{ insight|raw }}</li>
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js", "start_line": 805, "end_line": 845}
Result
File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js (Total lines: 3154)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 805-845
805| 'pendencias',
806| semantic,
807| adriana,
808| 'action_plan'
809| );
810| }
811|
812| function updateOverviewSemanticAdriana(semantic, adriana) {
813| renderSemanticAdrianaRow(
814| 'ssma-ap-semantic-adriana-visao-geral',
815| 'visao_geral',
816| semantic,
817| adriana,
818| 'action_plan_overview'
819| );
820| }
821|
822| function updateOperationalSummary(summary) {
823| var container = document.querySelector('[data-ap-panel-view="pendencias"] .ssma-ap-operational-summary');
824| if (!container || !summary) {
825| return;
826| }
827| var rowsHtml = (summary.rows || []).map(function (row) {
828| return '<div class="ssma-ap-op-row">'
829| + '<div class="ssma-ap-op-row-head"><span>' + escapeHtml(row.label) + '</span>'
830| + '<span class="ssma-ap-op-row-value">' + escapeHtml(row.count) + ' · ' + escapeHtml(row.percent) + '%</span></div>'
831| + '<div class="ssma-ap-op-progress" aria-hidden="true"><div class="ssma-ap-op-progress-fill" style="width: '
832| + escapeHtml(row.percent) + '%;"></div></div></div>';
833| }).join('');
834| var total = summary.total || {};
835| container.innerHTML = '<div class="ssma-ap-operational-summary-title">Resumo Operacional</div>'
836| + rowsHtml
837| + '<div class="ssma-ap-op-total"><span>' + escapeHtml(total.label || 'Total de pendências') + '</span>'
838| + '<span>' + escapeHtml(total.value || '0') + ' · ' + escapeHtml(total.percent || 100) + '%</span></div>';
839| }
840|
841| function priorityPillClass(key) {
842| var map = {
843| alta: 'red',
844| critica: 'red',
845| urgente: 'red',
Request #10
deepseek-v4-flash
P:110.54K C:2.43K CR:109.7K CW:0
18679ms
Reasoning
The occurrence panel also uses `{{ insight|raw }}` precedent — so the same pattern existed already. That reduces the severity of flagging the twig `|raw` since it's an existing established pattern for these LLM insights (likely plain text, may include rich formatting). But the JS duplication still introduces another injection point for dynamically-updated content.
However, per review rule, insights are from AI — treated as trusted internal content but can echo user text. I'll flag as medium but note precedent exists and needs a shared sanitizer.
Let me look at what insight content looks like - e.g., SsmaOccurrencePanelSectionAnalytics builds insight strings with `**` markdown? Let me not over-dig. I'll keep medium.
Now produce final comments. Since user asked in pt-BR and comments need a precise, direct first sentence per user rules.
Let me prepare the code_comment items. Severity mapping: bug high, security medium-high, etc.
Comments:
1. File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js — HIGH (bug)
existing_code lines (from diff):
```
setText('ssma-ap-action-view-title', title);
setText('ssma-ap-action-view-id', id ? ('#' + id) : '');
```
Wait need to ensure they are consecutive. Yes lines 3005-3006 consecutive. Also add context lines maybe. Let's include those 2 lines.
Content (pt-BR): "Clicar em 'Visualizar' na tabela de pendências não abre detalhe algum: o botão chama esta função, que procura os campos `ssma-ap-action-view-title/id/...` e as funções `openOffcanvasssmaApActionView()`/`#ssmaApActionView`, mas nenhum desses identificadores existe no HTML desta PR — o offcanvas criado (`_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig`) usa `data-ap-detail` e o id `ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas`, e nem chega a ser incluído por nenhum template. Resultado: usuário clica e nada acontece (a função sai em `if (!canvas) return`). É preciso incluir o partial na tela e alinhar o preenchimento com os campos `data-ap-detail` existentes (ou buscar os dados da ação por endpoint), mantendo um único contrato entre JS e markup."
2. File: templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig — HIGH (bug/orphan). existing_code:
```
{% embed 'components/_modal_offcanvas.html.twig' with {
modal_id: 'ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas',
```
Content: "Este offcanvas de 'Detalhes da ação' não é incluído em nenhum template do repositório (busca por `_action_plan_view_offcanvas` só retorna o próprio arquivo), então ele nunca é renderizado. Como o botão 'Visualizar' do painel depende de um offcanvas para exibir os detalhes, a funcionalidade fica inacessível. Inclua o partial na tela do Painel (ou remova se o fluxo for feito por outro componente) e garanta que o JS que popula os campos use os mesmos seletores (`data-ap-detail`) usados aqui."
3. File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js — MEDIUM (security XSS). existing_code:
```
return insights.map(function (item) {
return '<li>' + item + '</li>';
}).join('');
```
Content: "Os insights da Adriana são inseridos como HTML bruto (mesmo padrão de `{{ insight|raw }}` no Twig) sem escapar o conteúdo. Como esses textos são gerados a partir de dados do painel — inclusive campos preenchidos por usuários (títulos/descrições) que podem vazar para a análise — um conteúdo com markup pode ser renderizado no navegador de quem abrir o painel. Recomendo tratar os insights como texto e escapar antes do innerHTML, ou garantir sanitização/allowlist na origem (backend) antes de devolver ao cliente."
4. File: templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig — MEDIUM. existing_code:
```
<li>{{ insight|raw }}</li>
```
Content similar referencing dynamic updates and that backend should sanitize. Mention parity with occurrence panel? Actually mention it's the SSR twin of issue and both should be unified.
5. File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel.html.twig — MEDIUM/LOW performance. existing_code:
```
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/html2canvas/1.4.1/html2canvas.min.js"></script>
```
Content: "O html2canvas (≈ 1 MB) é baixado sempre que a aba Painel abre, mesmo para quem nunca exporta, e ao mesmo tempo o action_plan_panel.js já tem `ensureHtml2Canvas()` que faz o carregamento sob demanda — deixando o loader do JS sem efeito. Manter os dois caminhos dobra o custo de rede/render e ainda depende de CDN externa sem SRI no fluxo principal. Sugiro remover esta tag estática e deixar o lazy-load cuidar da inclusão somente no clique em 'Exportar gráficos'."
6. File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel.html.twig — LOW security hardening. existing_code:
```
<script type="application/json" id="ssma-ap-panel-data-json">{{ panel|json_encode|raw }}</script>
```
Content: "Este JSON embute dados do painel (que incluem títulos, descrições e demais campos digitados por usuário) dentro de um `<script>` sem escapar `<`/`>`. No PHP o json_encode escapa `/`, então a sequência `</script>` costuma ser neutralizada, mas para seguir a mesma proteção já adotada em outros pontos do módulo (effectiveness/leadership_evaluation usam `json_encode(15)` = JSON_HEX_TAG|AMP|APOS|QUOT) e fechar qualquer vetor residual (`<!--`, etc.), recomendo trocar por `json_encode(constant('JSON_HEX_TAG')|constant('JSON_HEX_AMP')|constant('JSON_HEX_APOS')|constant('JSON_HEX_QUOT'))`."
Hmm phrasing long; shorten.
7. File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js — maintainability (medium). existing_code:
```
function updateOverviewKpiRow(indicators) {
```
Content: "`updateKpiRow` e `updateOverviewKpiRow` (e também o bloco semântico/Adriana, exportação, presets de período) são cópias quase idênticas entre si e do que já existe no painel de Ocorrências — em um arquivo novo de ~3.150 linhas. Isso dobra o custo de manutenção e faz correções de bug em uma tela não serem replicadas na outra. Vale extrair os comportamentos comuns (atualização de KPI, insights, captura/print, período/presets) para helpers compartilhados em public/js/ssma/ e deixar este arquivo só com a orquestração da tela."
8. File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js — LOW dead code. existing_code:
```
function resetCustomSelect(selectId, defaultLabel) {
```
Content: "Função sem nenhum chamador no repositório (busca por `resetCustomSelect(` não retorna usos); se não for usada pelos filtros, remova junto com o CSS órfão correspondente para evitar manutenção de código morto."
9. File: public/css/ssma/action_plan_panel.css — LOW orphan styles. existing_code:
```
#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns {
```
Content: "Regras como `.ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns/item`, `.ssma-ap-overview-semantic-icon*` e o `@container ap-ia-inner` referenciam classes que não existem no markup renderizado pelos templates desta PR (o bloco semântico usa `.ssma-panel-semantic`/`.ssma-semantic-focus`). São estilos órfãos num arquivo já grande (1.250 linhas); remova ou vincule às classes reais."
10. File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js — LOW style (var). existing_code:
```
var charts = {};
```
Content short: "Arquivo novo inteiro usa `var` (padrão proibido pelas regras do repo). Como o restante dos scripts legados do SSMA também usa `var`, alinhe a convenção (let/const) numa limpeza antes de o arquivo crescer mais — sem impacto funcional agora."
Wait: is it true that legacy ssma scripts also use var? We saw _panel_scripts.html.twig uses `var`. So phrase carefully: "repositório aponta let/const como padrão; o arquivo inteiro novo usa var. Se o restante do SSMA mantém var por legado, ao menos padronize a decisão (ex.: incluir no eslint) antes do arquivo crescer." Actually perhaps skip if it's legacy convention and produces noise? The user rules for this file list "Using var is strictly prohibited". So mandatory rule. I'll include low severity and short.
Should I include the offcanvas mismatch in BOTH JS and twig as two comments? That is fine.
Also consider: is there a bug in `index.html.twig` where tabs now changed `plano_tabs` id to `plano_acao_tabs` and code elsewhere references `#plano_tabs`? Search for '#plano_tabs' or `plano_tabs`. If other JS binds to #plano_tabs (like tabShown handler in `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` or elsewhere), renaming could break that handler or other behavior. The observePainelTab in the new JS listens for tabShown with id `tab_plano_painel`. Let me search for 'plano_tabs' usage.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "plano_tabs|plano_acao_tabs|tab_plano_painel", "use_perl_regexp": true}
Result
File: .opencodereview/rules/ssma/action-plan-panel.md
Match lines: 6
22|1. **`/plano-acao?tab=tab_plano_painel` abria sem KPIs** — só `planoAcaoPainel` hidratava `action_plan_panel_data`; a index não. O JS (`updateKpiRow`) só atualiza cards já renderizados no SSR.
44|- Renderiza `ssma/action_plan/index.html.twig` com `ssmaPlanoAcaoActiveTab = tab_plano_painel`.
45|- `planoAcaoIndex` (`GET /manager/ssma/plano-acao`) e `planoAcaoPainel` hidratam `action_plan_panel_data`. Sem isso a URL `?tab=tab_plano_painel` renderiza a aba Painel **sem** os 4 KPIs (o JS só atualiza cards já existentes).
46|- Query param `tab` na index define a aba ativa (`tab_plano_acoes` | `tab_plano_painel` | config | permissão).
143|4. **Hidratação dupla na index.** `planoAcaoIndex` chama `buildActionPlanPanelViewData` mesmo quando a aba ativa é Ações — custo aceitável para garantir `?tab=tab_plano_painel` sem rota dedicada.
151|3. **`planoAcaoIndex` sem `action_plan_panel_data`** — regressão que deixa a linha de KPIs vazia em `?tab=tab_plano_painel`.
File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js
Match lines: 5
3091| var painelPanel = document.getElementById('tab_plano_painel_content');
3101| var link = ev.target && ev.target.closest ? ev.target.closest('#plano_acao_tabs .app-tab-link') : null;
3106| if (target.indexOf('tab_plano_painel_content') !== -1) {
3113| if (tabId === 'tab_plano_painel') {
3148| var _painelInitPanel = document.getElementById('tab_plano_painel_content');
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/index.html.twig
Match lines: 3
27| {'id': 'tab_plano_painel', 'label': 'Painel', 'target_div': 'tab_plano_painel_content'}
52| 'tabs_id': 'plano_acao_tabs',
65| <div id="tab_plano_painel_content" class="tab-panel" style="display:none;">
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["public/js/ssma/*.js"], "search_text": "^\\s*var ", "use_perl_regexp": true}
Result
Note: The results have been truncated. Only showing first 100 results.
File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js
Match lines: 100
4| var ROOT_ID = 'ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root';
5| var charts = {};
6| var initialized = false;
7| var currentView = 'pendencias';
8| var overviewChartsRendered = false;
9| var panelData = null;
10| var PANEL_FILTER_URL = '';
11| var panelFilterGen = 0;
12| var panelFilterDebounce = null;
13| var panelFilterAbort = null;
14| var pairedChartsResizeTimer = null;
15| var apPainelMonths = ['Jan', 'Fev', 'Mar', 'Abr', 'Mai', 'Jun', 'Jul', 'Ago', 'Set', 'Out', 'Nov', 'Dez'];
16| var apPainelEndDate = new Date();
17| var apPainelStartDate = new Date();
18| var apPainelPeriodMode = 'next_month';
19| var apOverviewEndDate = new Date();
20| var apOverviewStartDate = new Date();
21| var apOverviewPeriodMode = 'last_3_months';
22| var pendenciasHeaderFiltersBound = false;
23| var panelState = {
40| var COLORS = {
49| var PENDENCIAS_CHART_KEYS = ['critical', 'topResponsible', 'origin'];
50| var OVERVIEW_CHART_KEYS = ['overviewEvolution', 'overviewOriginTime', 'overviewPersonTime'];
57| var el = document.getElementById('ssma-ap-panel-config-json');
69| var config = parsePanelConfig();
88| var el = document.getElementById(id);
101| var parts = String(value || '').split('-').map(Number);
113| var oneDay = 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000;
114| var startUtc = Date.UTC(start.getFullYear(), start.getMonth(), start.getDate());
115| var endUtc = Date.UTC(end.getFullYear(), end.getMonth(), end.getDate());
120| var $ = window.jQuery || window.$;
138| var today = new Date();
140| var start = new Date(today.getTime());
141| var end = new Date(today.getTime());
170| var startInput = document.getElementById('ap_painel_start_date');
171| var endInput = document.getElementById('ap_painel_end_date');
172| var labelEl = document.getElementById('ap_painel_period_label');
173| var summaryEl = document.getElementById('ap_painel_period_summary');
174| var startValue = toInputDate(apPainelStartDate);
175| var endValue = toInputDate(apPainelEndDate);
205| var startInput = document.getElementById('ap_painel_start_date');
206| var endInput = document.getElementById('ap_painel_end_date');
211| var start = parseInputDate(startInput.value);
212| var end = parseInputDate(endInput.value);
218| var temp = start;
239| var $ = window.jQuery || window.$;
257| var startInput = document.getElementById('ap_overview_start_date');
258| var endInput = document.getElementById('ap_overview_end_date');
259| var labelEl = document.getElementById('ap_overview_period_label');
260| var summaryEl = document.getElementById('ap_overview_period_summary');
261| var startValue = toInputDate(apOverviewStartDate);
262| var endValue = toInputDate(apOverviewEndDate);
263| var todayStr = toInputDate(new Date());
296| var rangeParts = preset.split(':');
311| var today = new Date();
313| var start = new Date(today.getTime());
314| var end = new Date(today.getTime());
317| var weekday = today.getDay();
318| var mondayOffset = weekday === 0 ? 6 : weekday - 1;
342| var startInput = document.getElementById('ap_overview_start_date');
343| var endInput = document.getElementById('ap_overview_end_date');
348| var start = parseInputDate(startInput.value);
349| var end = parseInputDate(endInput.value);
355| var temp = start;
376| var params = new URLSearchParams();
410| var viewKey = view || currentView;
436| var targetView = view || currentView;
437| var myGen = ++panelFilterGen;
444| var params = buildFilterParams(targetView);
496| var jsonEl = document.getElementById('ssma-ap-panel-data-json');
539| var trendLabel = kpi.trend && kpi.trend.label ? kpi.trend.label : '';
540| var footerText = kpi.footerText || kpiFooterText(kpi.footer);
541| var html = '<div class="col-12 col-md-6 col-xl-3 mb-2 mb-xl-0"><div class="mhs-card">'
554| var row = document.getElementById('ssma-ap-kpi-row');
558| var cards = row.querySelectorAll('.mhs-card');
564| var card = cards[index];
568| var titleEl = card.querySelector('.mhs-card-title');
569| var valueEl = card.querySelector('.mhs-card-value');
570| var bodyEl = card.querySelector('.mhs-card-body');
571| var detailsEl = card.querySelector('.mhs-card-details');
579| var contentEl = bodyEl.querySelector(':scope > span');
580| var trendLabel = kpi.trend && kpi.trend.label ? kpi.trend.label : '';
591| var footerText = kpi.footerText || kpiFooterText(kpi.footer);
594| var footer = document.createElement('div');
602| var footerWrap = detailsEl.closest('.mhs-card-footer');
611| var kpis = (indicators || []).map(function (indicator) {
619| var row = document.getElementById('ssma-ap-overview-kpi-row');
623| var cards = row.querySelectorAll('.mhs-card');
631| var card = cards[index];
635| var titleEl = card.querySelector('.mhs-card-title');
636| var valueEl = card.querySelector('.mhs-card-value');
637| var bodyEl = card.querySelector('.mhs-card-body');
638| var detailsEl = card.querySelector('.mhs-card-details');
646| var contentEl = bodyEl.querySelector(':scope > span');
647| var trendLabel = kpi.trend && kpi.trend.label ? kpi.trend.label : '';
658| var footerText = kpi.footerText || '';
661| var footer = document.createElement('div');
669| var footerWrap = detailsEl.closest('.mhs-card-footer');
678| var textEl = document.querySelector('[data-ap-panel-view="pendencias"] .ssma-ap-recommendation-header + .ssma-ap-semantic-summary');
688| var html = '<div class="d-flex align-items-center flex-wrap mb-3" style="gap:6px;">'
File: public/js/ssma/effectiveness.js
Match lines: 100
4| var lineChartInstance = null;
5| var barChartInstance = null;
8| var root = document.documentElement;
9| var value = window.getComputedStyle(root).getPropertyValue(name).trim();
11| var guard = 0;
13| var match = value.match(/^var\(\s*(--[\w-]+)\s*(?:,\s*([^)]+))?\)\s*$/i);
46| var key = String((item && item.key) || '');
63| var node = document.getElementById('effectiveness-actions-payload');
69| var parsed = JSON.parse(node.textContent || '[]');
78| var node = document.getElementById('effectiveness-chart-payload');
91| var node = document.getElementById('effectiveness-copy-payload');
97| var parsed = JSON.parse(node.textContent || '{}');
118| var li = document.createElement('li');
121| var date = document.createElement('span');
125| var label = document.createElement('span');
142| var emptyItem = document.createElement('li');
149| var li = document.createElement('li');
165| var items = badges || [];
173| var item = document.createElement('div');
176| var label = document.createElement('span');
198| var value = String(facts[label] || '').trim();
203| var wrapper = document.createElement('div');
204| var term = document.createElement('dt');
205| var description = document.createElement('dd');
217| var node = document.getElementById(id);
222| var text = String(value || '').trim();
224| var wrapper = node.closest('[data-effectiveness-person]');
231| var currentAttempt = attempt || 0;
232| var loaderState = window.__dynamicChartHighchartsLoaderState || {};
239| var empty = document.getElementById('effectivenessChartEmpty');
259| var help = period && period.chart_context_help ? period.chart_context_help : null;
260| var content = document.getElementById('effectivenessChartContextHelp');
261| var trigger = document.querySelector('[aria-controls="effectivenessChartContextHelp"]');
266| var lines = help && Array.isArray(help.display_lines) ? help.display_lines : [];
282| var textWrap = document.createElement('span');
289| var lineNode = document.createElement('span');
302| var period = payload && payload.periods ? payload.periods[periodKey] : null;
303| var container = document.getElementById('effectivenessProgressChart');
304| var empty = document.getElementById('effectivenessChartEmpty');
305| var legendContainer = document.getElementById('effectivenessChartLegend');
306| var trendNode = document.getElementById('effectivenessChartTrend');
307| var singleNoteNode = document.getElementById('effectivenessChartSingleDimensionNote');
312| var hasData = Boolean(period.has_data);
313| var plottedSeriesKeys = Array.isArray(period.plotted_series) ? period.plotted_series : [];
314| var dimensions = Array.isArray(period.dimensions) ? period.dimensions : [];
329| var behavioralNoteNode = document.getElementById('effectivenessChartBehavioralLineNote');
337| var effectivelyEmpty = !hasData || plottedSeriesKeys.length === 0;
352| var seriesByKey = {};
361| var seriesConfig = plottedSeriesKeys.map(function (key) {
362| var item = seriesByKey[key] || { name: key, color: '#186073', data: [] };
374| var dimensionsByKey = {};
445| var overallEntry = {
459| var entries = [overallEntry].concat(dimensions || []);
466| var item = document.createElement('li');
471| var swatch = document.createElement('span');
476| var label = document.createElement('span');
480| var meta = document.createElement('span');
486| var parts = [];
517| var reason = document.createElement('span');
526| var ariaLabel = (dim.label || dim.key)
543| var lines = ['<strong>' + context.x + '</strong>'];
546| var key = point.series && point.series.options ? point.series.options.key : null;
547| var dim = key ? dimensionsByKey[key] : null;
548| var value = point.y === null || point.y === undefined
573| var detailLines = [value + '/100'];
597| var period = payload && payload.periods ? payload.periods[periodKey] : null;
598| var container = document.getElementById('effectivenessBarChart');
599| var empty = document.getElementById('effectivenessBarChartEmpty');
604| var items = period.bar_items || [];
605| var hasData = Boolean(period.bar_has_data);
606| var legend = document.getElementById('effectivenessBarChartLegend');
674| var point = this.point || {};
675| var lines = ['<strong>' + (point.category || this.x) + '</strong>'];
724| var hidden = document.getElementById('effectivenessPeriodFilter');
733| var url = new URL(window.location.href);
756| var payload = readChartPayload();
761| var buttons = document.querySelectorAll('[data-effectiveness-chart-period]');
762| var selected = payload.default_period || '30d';
768| var active = candidate === button;
789| var currentAttempt = attempt || 0;
805| var $wrapper = window.jQuery('#effectivenessActionDetail-offcanvas-wrapper');
814| var $appPageBody = window.jQuery('.app-page-body').first();
829| var date = new Date(value);
841| var node = document.getElementById(id);
859| var note = document.createElement('p');
861| var label = document.createElement('strong');
863| var text = document.createElement('span');
871| var wrapper = document.createElement('div');
872| var term = document.createElement('dt');
873| var description = document.createElement('dd');
898| var width = typeof score === 'number' && !isNaN(score) ? Math.max(0, Math.min(100, score)) : 0;
916| var drawer = action.drawer || {};
917| var dimension = drawer.dimension || {};
918| var origin = drawer.origin || {};
919| var effectiveness = drawer.effectiveness || action.effectiveness || {};
920| var observedResult = drawer.observed_result || effectiveness.observed_result || {};
921| var details = drawer.details || {};
922| var evaluation = drawer.evaluation || {};
923| var copy = readCopyPayload();
924| var closureQuality = effectiveness.closure_quality || null;
File: public/js/ssma/effectiveness_leadership.js
Match lines: 100
4| var chartInstances = {};
5| var resizeTimer = null;
12| var node = document.getElementById('leadership-effectiveness-payload');
18| var parsed = JSON.parse(node.textContent || '{}');
45| var currentAttempt = attempt || 0;
46| var loaderState = window.__dynamicChartHighchartsLoaderState || {};
121| var applicable = asCount(step.applicable_count);
122| var qualified = asCount(step.qualified_count);
123| var loss = asCount(step.loss_from_previous);
124| var notMeasured = asCount(step.not_measured_count);
134| var raw = step.raw_completed_count;
135| var qualified = step.qualified_count;
146| var stageLabel = step.label || 'Etapa do funil';
147| var applicable = asCount(step.applicable_count);
148| var qualified = asCount(step.qualified_count);
149| var loss = asCount(step.loss_from_previous);
150| var notApplicable = asCount(step.not_applicable_count);
151| var notMeasured = asCount(step.not_measured_count);
152| var summary = buildFunnelStepSummary(step);
153| var preAdjustment = shouldShowPreAdjustmentCount(step)
189| var loss = formatCount(step.loss_from_previous);
190| var notApplicable = formatCount(step.not_applicable_count);
191| var notMeasured = formatCount(step.not_measured_count);
192| var stageLabel = step.label || 'Etapa do funil';
193| var tooltipId = 'leadership-funnel-step-help-' + index;
194| var ariaLabel = 'Explicar métricas da etapa ' + stageLabel
227| var tooltip = wrapper.querySelector('.effectiveness-info-content');
240| var dismiss = !!(options && options.dismiss);
243| var button = wrapper.querySelector('[data-leadership-funnel-help-trigger]');
259| var margin = 12;
260| var viewportWidth = window.innerWidth;
261| var viewportHeight = window.innerHeight;
262| var tipRect = tooltip.getBoundingClientRect();
263| var top = tipRect.top;
264| var left = tipRect.left;
284| var tooltip = wrapper.querySelector('.effectiveness-info-content');
291| var viewportWidth = window.innerWidth;
292| var viewportHeight = window.innerHeight;
293| var margin = 12;
294| var maxWidth = Math.min(360, viewportWidth - (margin * 2));
295| var triggerRect = trigger.getBoundingClientRect();
296| var isMobile = viewportWidth < 576;
313| var left = triggerRect.left;
346| var wrapper = trigger.closest('.effectiveness-leadership-funnel-detail-help');
355| var isOpen = wrapper.classList.contains('is-open');
363| var otherTrigger = openNode.querySelector('[data-effectiveness-help-trigger]');
429| var isActive = wrapper.classList.contains('is-open')
435| var trigger = wrapper.querySelector('[data-leadership-funnel-help-trigger]');
445| var colors = payload && payload.colors && typeof payload.colors === 'object' ? payload.colors : {};
450| var node = container('leadershipFunnelChart');
451| var variants = payload.funnel && Array.isArray(payload.funnel.variants) ? payload.funnel.variants : [];
452| var activeKey = node ? (node.getAttribute('data-active-funnel') || 'consolidated') : 'consolidated';
453| var selectedVariant = variants.find(function (variant) { return variant.variant_key === activeKey; }) || variants[0] || payload.funnel || {};
454| var steps = Array.isArray(selectedVariant.steps) ? selectedVariant.steps : [];
459| var selector = variants.length > 1 ? '<div class="effectiveness-leadership-funnel-tabs" role="tablist" aria-label="Dimensão do funil">' + variants.map(function (variant) {
460| var selected = variant.variant_key === (selectedVariant.variant_key || activeKey);
463| var hasFunnelData = selectedVariant.has_data !== false && steps.length && steps.some(function (step) { return (step.qualified_count || step.completed_count || step.applicable_count || 0) > 0; });
470| var total = Math.max.apply(null, steps.map(function (step) { return step.qualified_count || step.completed_count || 0; }).concat([1]));
472| var completed = step.qualified_count || step.completed_count || 0;
473| var width = Math.max(34, Math.round((completed / total) * 100));
497| var node = container(id);
509| var key = band && band.key ? String(band.key) : '';
510| var fallbacks = {
520| var key = band && band.key ? String(band.key) : '';
521| var fromBand = band && typeof band.description === 'string' ? band.description.trim() : '';
525| var fallbacks = {
540| var ctx = context && typeof context === 'object' ? context : {};
541| var point = ctx.point || ctx;
542| var options = (point && point.options) || ctx.options || {};
543| var custom = options.custom || point.custom || ctx.custom || {};
545| var name = String(
551| var quantity = asCount(
554| var percentageValue = typeof ctx.percentage === 'number' && isFinite(ctx.percentage)
557| var percentage = isFinite(percentageValue) ? Math.round(percentageValue) : 0;
558| var description = String(
563| var quantityLabel = quantity === 1 ? 'liderança' : 'lideranças';
579| var id = 'leadershipDistributionChart';
580| var node = container(id);
581| var distribution = payload.distribution || {};
582| var bands = Array.isArray(distribution.bands) ? distribution.bands : [];
583| var denominator = typeof distribution.denominator === 'number' && isFinite(distribution.denominator)
586| var excludedCount = asCount(distribution.excluded_count);
614| var html = buildLeadershipDistributionTooltipHtml(this);
635| var key = band.key || '';
636| var description = distributionBandDescription(band);
649| var meta = document.querySelector('[data-chart-meta="distribution"]');
663| var options = pointOptions && typeof pointOptions === 'object' ? pointOptions : {};
664| var isProjection = !!options.is_projection;
665| var isBridge = !!options.is_bridge;
666| var label = String(options.label || options.period_label || 'Subperíodo');
667| var score = numericOrNull(options.average_score != null ? options.average_score : options.y);
668| var scoreLabel = score === null ? 'N/D' : (score + '/100');
669| var calculable = countOrFallback(options.calculable_leaders_count, null);
670| var totalFormal = countOrFallback(options.total_formal_leaders_count, null);
671| var insufficient = countOrFallback(options.insufficient_count, null);
672| var consolidated = countOrFallback(options.consolidated_count, null);
673| var partial = countOrFallback(options.partial_count, null);
674| var attention = countOrFallback(options.attention_count, null);
681| var html = ''
725| var id = 'leadershipTrendChart';
File: public/js/ssma/leadership_evaluation.js
Match lines: 100
9| var leadersPayload = [];
10| var isSubmittingFilters = false;
11| var isPageHydrating = true;
14| var node = document.getElementById('leadership-leaders-payload');
20| var parsed = JSON.parse(node.textContent || '[]');
28| var node = document.getElementById('leadership-charts-payload');
41| var colors = {
60| var chart = document.getElementById(chartId);
61| var empty = document.getElementById(emptyId);
71| var xAxis = chart && chart.xAxis ? chart.xAxis[0] : null;
97| var currentAttempt = attempt || 0;
98| var loaderState = window.__dynamicChartHighchartsLoaderState || {};
106| var empty = document.getElementById(id);
140| var container = input.closest('.search-expandable-container');
153| var select = document.getElementById(id);
163| var selectedOption = select.options[select.selectedIndex];
164| var selectedText = selectedOption ? selectedOption.text : '';
165| var display = document.getElementById(id + '-display');
170| var wrapper = select.closest('.mhs-mobile-select-fullscreen');
173| var isSelected = String(option.getAttribute('data-value')) === String(value);
190| var wrapper = select.closest('.custom-modern-select-wrapper');
195| var selectedOption = select.options[select.selectedIndex];
196| var selectedText = selectedOption ? selectedOption.text : '';
197| var label = wrapper.querySelector('.custom-modern-select-label');
204| var isSelected = String(option.getAttribute('data-value')) === String(select.value);
219| var tabHidden = document.getElementById('leadershipTabFilter');
220| var viewHidden = document.getElementById('leadershipViewFilter');
221| var url = new URL(window.location.href);
223| var tab = tabHidden ? tabHidden.value : (url.searchParams.get('tab') || 'overview');
228| var view = viewHidden ? viewHidden.value : url.searchParams.get('view');
233| var sort = url.searchParams.get('sort');
244| var params = new URLSearchParams();
247| var value = String(field.value || '').trim();
255| var searchInput = getLeadershipSearchInput();
257| var searchValue = String(searchInput.value || '').trim();
264| var hiddenValue = String(field.value || '').trim();
279| var action = form.getAttribute('action') || window.location.pathname;
280| var query = params.toString();
292| var currentAttempt = attempt || 0;
313| var $wrapper = window.jQuery('#leadershipLeaderDetail-offcanvas-wrapper');
322| var $appPageBody = window.jQuery('.app-page-body').first();
332| var text = String(label || 'Dados insuficientes');
342| var score = leader.score_display || 'N/D';
343| var actions = detail.actions_evaluated ?? leader.actions_evaluated ?? 0;
344| var confidence = (leader.confidence && leader.confidence.label) ? leader.confidence.label : 'N/D';
345| var severity = detail.severity_context || leader.severity_context || 'N/D';
353| var result = String(action.result_label || action.classification || '').toLowerCase();
374| var detail = leader.detail || {};
375| var title = document.getElementById('leadershipDrawerTitle');
376| var identityName = document.getElementById('leadershipDrawerIdentityName');
377| var identityMeta = document.getElementById('leadershipDrawerIdentityMeta');
378| var classification = document.getElementById('leadershipDrawerClassification');
379| var summary = document.getElementById('leadershipDrawerSummary');
380| var score = document.getElementById('leadershipDrawerScore');
381| var scoreStatus = document.getElementById('leadershipDrawerScoreStatus');
382| var scoreBar = document.getElementById('leadershipDrawerScoreBar');
383| var actionsEvaluated = document.getElementById('leadershipDrawerActionsEvaluated');
384| var actionsCompleted = document.getElementById('leadershipDrawerActionsCompleted');
385| var effectiveActions = document.getElementById('leadershipDrawerEffectiveActions');
386| var recurrences = document.getElementById('leadershipDrawerRecurrences');
387| var similar = document.getElementById('leadershipDrawerSimilar');
388| var confidence = document.getElementById('leadershipDrawerConfidence');
389| var severity = document.getElementById('leadershipDrawerSeverity');
390| var openActions = document.getElementById('leadershipDrawerOpenActions');
391| var insufficient = document.getElementById('leadershipDrawerInsufficient');
392| var relatedList = document.getElementById('leadershipDrawerRelatedActions');
401| var meta = [];
424| var numericScore = Number(leader.score);
425| var hasScore = Number.isFinite(numericScore);
459| var related = detail.related_actions || leader.related_actions || [];
464| var item = document.createElement('li');
465| var scoreLabel = action.score === null || action.score === undefined ? 'N/D' : action.score + '/100';
466| var variant = resultBadgeVariant(action);
497| var searchInput = getLeadershipSearchInput();
498| var mobileSearch = document.getElementById('leadership-action-search-mobile-input');
520| var sortSelect = document.getElementById('leadershipLeadersSort');
535| var mobileSort = document.getElementById('leadershipLeadersSortMobile');
546| var targetUrl = buildSortUrl(mobileSort.value);
555| var desktopPeriod = document.getElementById('leadership-evaluation-period');
556| var mobilePeriod = document.getElementById('leadershipPeriodFilterMobile');
561| var applied = desktopPeriod.getAttribute('data-applied-period')
598| var mobileForm = document.getElementById('leadershipFiltersMobileForm');
602| var desktopForm = document.getElementById('leadership-evaluation-filter-form');
615| var mobileField = document.getElementById(pair[0]);
616| var desktopField = document.getElementById(pair[1]);
626| var mobileSearch = document.getElementById('leadership-action-search-mobile-input');
627| var desktopSearch = getLeadershipSearchInput();
643| var button = event.target.closest('.leadership-mobile-clear-filters');
649| var mobileForm = document.getElementById('leadershipFiltersMobileForm');
650| var desktopForm = document.getElementById('leadership-evaluation-filter-form');
664| var periodSelect = document.getElementById('leadership-evaluation-period');
668| var mobilePeriod = document.getElementById('leadershipPeriodFilterMobile');
673| var searchInput = getLeadershipSearchInput();
674| var mobileSearch = document.getElementById('leadership-action-search-mobile-input');
693| var button = event.target.closest('.lead-view-toggle');
698| var url = button.getAttribute('data-leadership-view-url');
708| var button = event.target.closest('.leadership-detail-btn, .effectiveness-detail-btn[data-leader-id]');
716| var leaderId = button.getAttribute('data-leader-id');
718| var card = button.closest('[data-leader-id]');
726| var leader = getLeaderById(leaderId);
File: public/js/ssma/ssma-member-picker.js
Match lines: 55
12| var shared = window.SsmaShared;
13| var AVATAR_COLORS = ['#EA151C', '#186073', '#25AD52', '#FFC107', '#6F42C1', '#FD7E14', '#20C997', '#DC3545'];
14| var activeOptions = null;
15| var catalogBuilt = false;
17| var remotePickerLoaded = false;
43| var m = normalizeMember(row);
58| var url = shared.membersSearchUrl;
69| var items = (resp && Array.isArray(resp.items)) ? resp.items : [];
70| var existingIds = {};
75| var m = normalizeMember(row);
94| var initial = (member.name || '?').charAt(0).toUpperCase();
95| var uploadsBase = shared.uploadsPhotosBase || '/uploads/photos/';
97| var src = uploadsBase + String(member.avatar).replace(/^\/+/, '');
117| var selectId = $sel.attr('id');
118| var wrapper = $sel.closest('.custom-modern-select-wrapper');
119| var optionsDiv = wrapper.find('.custom-modern-options').first();
123| var html = '';
125| var val = $(this).attr('value');
157| var $sel = $('#ssmaMemberPickerCargoFilter');
161| var prev = $sel.val() || '';
162| var cargos = {};
179| var $sel = $('#ssmaMemberPickerTimeFilter');
183| var prev = $sel.val() || '';
184| var teams = {};
206| var $body = $('#ssmaMemberPickerTableBody');
210| var opts = activeOptions || {};
211| var exclude = {};
215| var selected = {};
219| var isSingle = opts.mode === 'single';
220| var inputType = isSingle ? 'radio' : 'checkbox';
221| var inputName = isSingle ? 'ssma-member-picker-single' : '';
222| var html = '';
231| var teamCell = m.team_display
263| var search = ($('#ssma-member-picker-search-input').val() || '').toLowerCase().trim();
264| var cargo = ($('#ssmaMemberPickerCargoFilter').val() || '').toLowerCase();
265| var time = ($('#ssmaMemberPickerTimeFilter').val() || '').toLowerCase();
266| var vinc = ($('#ssmaMemberPickerVinculoFilter').val() || '').toLowerCase();
267| var visible = 0;
270| var $r = $(this);
271| var name = String($r.attr('data-member-name') || '');
272| var email = $r.find('.member-email').text().toLowerCase();
273| var mCargo = String($r.attr('data-cargo') || '');
274| var mTime = String($r.attr('data-time') || '');
275| var mVinc = String($r.attr('data-vinculo') || '');
276| var ok = (search === '' || name.indexOf(search) !== -1 || email.indexOf(search) !== -1)
289| var el = document.getElementById('ssmaMemberPickerModal');
296| var $pageBody = $('.app-page-body').first();
310| var $search = $('#ssma-member-picker-search');
311| var $input = $('#ssma-member-picker-search-input');
324| var ids = [];
326| var id = parseInt($(this).val(), 10);
335| var map = {};
363| var renderAndBind = function () {
405| var $chk = $(this).find('.ssma-member-picker-chk');
417| var ids = collectSelectedIds();
File: public/js/ssma/ssma-table-export.js
Match lines: 40
7| var DEFAULT_EXCLUDE = ['Ações', 'ações'];
8| var WEEKDAYS_PT = ['Domingo', 'Segunda-Feira', 'Terça-Feira', 'Quarta-Feira', 'Quinta-Feira', 'Sexta-Feira', 'Sábado'];
9| var MONTHS_PT = ['Janeiro', 'Fevereiro', 'Março', 'Abril', 'Maio', 'Junho', 'Julho', 'Agosto', 'Setembro', 'Outubro', 'Novembro', 'Dezembro'];
22| var now = new Date();
36| var circles = node.querySelectorAll ? node.querySelectorAll('.member-avatar-circle') : [];
38| var names = [];
40| var label = (c.getAttribute('aria-label') || c.getAttribute('title') || '').trim();
45| var clone = node.cloneNode(true);
54| var $r = $(row);
60| var SEP = ';';
63| var s = String(value == null ? '' : value);
77| var $t = $('#' + tableId);
79| var dt = $t.DataTable();
80| var exclude = (config.excludeColumns || DEFAULT_EXCLUDE).map(function (s) { return s.trim().toLowerCase(); });
81| var fallback = config.columnTitles || [];
82| var colIndexes = [], headers = [];
86| var title = $(this.header()).text().trim() || String(fallback[this.index()] || '');
92| var rows = [];
95| var ri = this.index();
103| var table = document.getElementById(tableId);
105| var exclude = (config.excludeColumns || DEFAULT_EXCLUDE).map(function (s) { return s.trim().toLowerCase(); });
106| var fallback = config.columnTitles || [];
107| var colIndexes = [], headers = [];
110| var title = (th.textContent || '').trim() || String(fallback[i] || '');
116| var rows = [];
119| var tds = tr.querySelectorAll('td');
129| var meta = getPrintMeta();
130| var unit = 'Unidade Operacional - ' + (meta.operationalUnit || meta.companyName || '—');
131| var exportedBy = 'Exportado por: ' + (meta.exportedByName || '—') +
134| var lines = [];
144| var csvContent = '\uFEFF' + lines.join('\r\n');
145| var blob = new Blob([csvContent], { type: 'text/csv;charset=utf-8;' });
146| var url = URL.createObjectURL(blob);
147| var link = document.createElement('a');
160| var tableId = config.tableId;
163| var data = collectFromDataTable(tableId, config) || collectFromDom(tableId, config);
174| var isTable = localStorage.getItem(storageKey) === 'table';
179| var keys = {};
181| var k = btn.getAttribute('data-view-storage-key'); if (k) { keys[k] = true; }
197| var $btn = $(this);
Request #11
deepseek-v4-flash
P:121.65K C:365 CR:112.9K CW:0
4155ms
Reasoning
Legacy SSMA JS files (effectiveness.js etc.) use `var` extensively — so the `var` style is the module's established convention. The "var prohibited" rule conflicts with existing module patterns. Given this new file is written consistently with the module's legacy scripts, I'll drop the standalone `var` comment or make it a very short low note. I think I'll include it as low, short, referencing that the module legacy uses var and the lint rule requires let/const; aligning. Actually to reduce noise, maybe skip var comment because the module convention is `var`, and user rule says style-only findings with no real effect should be short/low. I'll include low but concise.
Now let me finalize and create the comments via code_comment. I must pick `existing_code` from newly added lines exactly as they appear in diff. Let me make sure snippets correspond to new lines in the diff file text.
Let me double check that diff line content for anchors:
JS openActionViewOffcanvas lines 3005-3006:
```
setText('ssma-ap-action-view-title', title);
setText('ssma-ap-action-view-id', id ? ('#' + id) : '');
```
These are present.
JS insights builder lines ~778-782:
Let me view the actual lines to copy exactly.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 785, "file_path": "public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js", "start_line": 760}
Result
File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js (Total lines: 3154)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 760-785
760| return '<div class="suggestion-card ssma-adriana-suggest-q" style="cursor:pointer;background:#fff;"'
761| + ' role="button" tabindex="0" title="' + escapeHtml(question) + '"'
762| + ' data-question="' + escapeHtml(question) + '" data-context="' + escapeHtml(context || 'action_plan') + '">'
763| + '<i class="fa-regular fa-sparkles suggestion-card__icon" aria-hidden="true"></i>'
764| + '<span class="suggestion-card__text">' + escapeHtml(question) + '</span></div>';
765| }).join('');
766| }
767|
768| function renderSemanticAdrianaRow(rowId, viewMode, semantic, adriana, context) {
769| var row = document.getElementById(rowId);
770| if (!row) {
771| return;
772| }
773|
774| var contentEl = row.querySelector('[data-ap-semantic-content]');
775| var insightsEl = row.querySelector('[data-ap-adriana-insights]');
776| var questionsEl = row.querySelector('[data-ap-adriana-questions]');
777| var emptyBody = viewMode === 'visao_geral'
778| ? 'Ajuste o período ou registre ações para que a Adriana identifique padrões e gere insights automáticos.'
779| : 'Ajuste os filtros ou aguarde novas pendências para visualizar a análise semântica e os insights.';
780|
781| if (contentEl) {
782| contentEl.innerHTML = viewMode === 'visao_geral'
783| ? buildOverviewSemanticHtml(semantic)
784| : buildPendenciasSemanticHtml(semantic);
785| }
Request #12
deepseek-v4-flash
P:122.47K C:112 CR:121.98K CW:0
2082ms
Reasoning
Let me read lines 750-758 to get the `buildAdrianaInsightsHtml` snippet.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 759, "file_path": "public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js", "start_line": 744}
Result
File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js (Total lines: 3154)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 744-759
744| + escapeHtml(item.text || '') + '</div>';
745| });
746| return html;
747| }
748|
749| function buildAdrianaInsightsHtml(insights, emptyBody) {
750| if (!insights || !insights.length) {
751| return '<li style="list-style:none;color:#7A858C;font-size:12px;">' + escapeHtml(emptyBody) + '</li>';
752| }
753| return insights.map(function (item) {
754| return '<li>' + item + '</li>';
755| }).join('');
756| }
757|
758| function buildAdrianaQuestionsHtml(questions, context) {
759| return (questions || []).slice(0, 3).map(function (question) {
Request #13
deepseek-v4-flash
P:122.81K C:663 CR:122.5K CW:0
5474ms
Reasoning
I have all snippet info now. Let me now make the code comments. I'll keep concise but structured as required (direct first sentence in PT).
Comments list finalized:
1. JS HIGH bug — offcanvas: anchor `setText('ssma-ap-action-view-title', title);` plus next line.
2. Twig offcanvas HIGH orphan: anchor embed header.
3. JS MEDIUM XSS insights: anchor `return '<li>' + item + '</li>';`.
4. Twig semantic MEDIUM XSS raw: anchor `<li>{{ insight|raw }}</li>`.
5. _tab_painel MEDIUM html2canvas duplication: anchor static script line.
6. _tab_painel LOW json_encode: anchor data-json script line.
7. JS MEDIUM maintainability duplication: anchor `function updateOverviewKpiRow(indicators) {`.
8. JS LOW dead code: anchor `function resetCustomSelect(selectId, defaultLabel) {`.
9. CSS LOW orphan styles: anchor `.ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns` line.
10. JS LOW var: anchor `var charts = {};` line. Hmm keep short.
Let me confirm line snippets for CSS anchor. CSS lines 416:
```
#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns {
```
Yes.
Now the snippet for html2canvas in twig: line 594:
`<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/html2canvas/1.4.1/html2canvas.min.js"></script>`
Snippet for json data: line 306:
` <script type="application/json" id="ssma-ap-panel-data-json">{{ panel|json_encode|raw }}</script>`
Twig offcanvas top lines:
```
{% embed 'components/_modal_offcanvas.html.twig' with {
modal_id: 'ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas',
```
Twig semantic insight line 105:
```
<li>{{ insight|raw }}</li>
```
Check indentation: The diff shows line with `<li>{{ insight|raw }}</li>` inside else for loop at some indentation. Let me verify quickly by reading file around line 100-108. Actually, from the diff the indentation of `<li>` lines: `{% else %}` then `<li style=...>` at 36 spaces; `<li>{{ insight|raw }}</li>` around 36 spaces. It's in the diff content but exact number of leading spaces needed for matching? The matcher probably uses the text lines normalized? To be safe, I should copy exactly from file read. Let me read that file portion to get exact lines.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 125, "file_path": "templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig", "start_line": 95}
Result
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig (Total lines: 176)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 95-125
95| <i class="{{ item.icon|default('fas fa-lightbulb') }} mr-1"
96| style="color:var(--app-brand-primary, var(--company-theme1, #186073));"></i>
97| <strong>{{ item.title|default('') }}:</strong>
98| {{ item.text|default('') }}
99| </div>
100| {% endfor %}
101| {% endif %}
102| {% endif %}
103| </div>
104| </div>
105| </div>
106| </div>
107|
108| <div class="col-12 col-lg-6 mb-2 mb-lg-0 d-flex">
109| <div class="mhs-card h-100 w-100 ssma-adriana-card">
110| <div class="mhs-card-header d-flex align-items-center justify-content-between flex-wrap" style="gap:10px;">
111| <div class="d-flex align-items-center flex-grow-1" style="gap:10px;min-width:0;">
112| <div class="chat-avatar flex-shrink-0 ssma-adriana-avatar" style="width:32px;height:32px;">
113| <img src="{{ asset('images/ia_images/adriana.png') }}" alt="Adriana" width="32" height="32">
114| </div>
115| <h2 class="mhs-card-title mb-0">
116| Insights da Adriana
117| <button type="button"
118| class="btn p-0 text-muted ml-1 border-0 bg-transparent"
119| data-toggle="tooltip"
120| data-placement="top"
121| title="Insights gerados automaticamente com base nos dados do painel filtrado."
122| aria-label="Informações">
123| <i class="far fa-info-circle" style="font-size:12px;"></i>
124| </button>
125| </h2>
Request #14
deepseek-v4-flash
P:123.98K C:103 CR:123.39K CW:0
1787ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 155, "file_path": "templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig", "start_line": 140}
Result
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig (Total lines: 176)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 140-155
140| {% for insight in _insights %}
141| <li>{{ insight|raw }}</li>
142| {% else %}
143| <li style="list-style:none;color:#7A858C;font-size:12px;">{{ _empty_body }}</li>
144| {% endfor %}
145| </ol>
146| {% endif %}
147| </div>
148| <div class="ssma-adriana-questions-col">
149| <div class="ssma-adriana-questions-title">Perguntas sugeridas</div>
150| {% if _no_data and _questions|length == 0 %}
151| <p class="mb-0" style="font-size:12px;color:#7A858C;margin-top:8px;">
152| As perguntas aparecerão aqui após o registro de dados no período.
153| </p>
154| {% else %}
155| <div class="suggestions-grid ssma-adriana-questions-grid ssma-panel-adriana" data-ap-adriana-questions>
Request #15
deepseek-v4-flash
P:124.39K C:3.37K CR:124.03K CW:0
24082ms
Reasoning
Good, anchor snippet: ` <li>{{ insight|raw }}</li>` (36 spaces).
Now create the code_comment call with all comments. Use path values matching files. Keep content in PT-BR, structured: direct first sentence.
Also, regarding the maintainability monolithic comment in JS: severity low/medium. User priority says duplicated logic has "maior peso". I'll set medium.
I will also review remaining files: index.html.twig — mostly tabs registration, header CSS. Should I comment about style block? Not necessary. But maybe there's a nuance: `defaultPlanoTab` default 'tab_plano_acoes' but the painel page uses `ssmaPlanoAcaoActiveTab`. Fine.
One more file `_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig` and `_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig` — pass check; nothing block-worthy. Note in `_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig`: `action_item.responsible_ids|default([]))[0]` fine.
However, careful about the responsible icons partial: it sets `margin-left: 0;` for all avatars and uses `member-avatars-stack` container class. Wait, in the twig partial the avatar divs all have `margin-left: 0` even when both present — but container `.member-avatars-stack` presumably applies negative margins for stacking. It's a style detail; skip.
CSS file: also contains unused `.ssma-ap-chart-host--column` etc? used. Also gauge heights used. Fine.
Potential real issue in CSS: `.ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns` etc. orphan and `@container` block only works when container defined (`.ssma-ap-ia-inner-body` has container-type; the semantic columns inside Adriana? Actually CSS defines `.ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns` inside `@container ap-ia-inner`, but the container element `.ssma-ap-ia-inner-body` is inside the pendências "ia-shell" card; but overview semantic columns don't exist. Orphan. Good comment #9 already.
Also note CSS `.ssma-ap-op-row-value { white-space: nowrap; }` etc. used.
I also want to double-check the JS `buildFilterParams` for potential contract: `panelState.area`, `execResponsible`, `valResponsible`, `management` for pendencias never set (syncPendenciasFilterState sets management? no). Fine; leftover from spec (buildFilterParams sets management only in visao_geral). Actually buildFilterParams for visao_geral sets management only if panelState.management. syncOverviewFilterState sets panelState.management. OK.
Bug: In applyApPainelPeriodPreset → `applyApPainelPeriodPreset(preset)` calls `updateAxisOptionsForPeriod(panelState.period)`; but `syncApPainelPeriodPresetUI` sets panelState.period via refreshApPanelPeriodLabel before, yes.
One more possible bug: In `switchView`, if viewId is 'comparativo', it calls destroyOverviewCharts() then triggerPanelFilter('comparativo'). Fine.
OK. Another potential bug: `waitHighcharts` interval not cleared after attempts>40 — left interval running (they clear only on success; after 40 attempts they clearTimeout inside? They call `window.clearInterval(timer)` in success branch only; on giving up after attempts>40 they do not clear interval — actually they do not clear. Look:
```
var attempts = 0;
var timer = window.setInterval(function () {
attempts += 1;
if (window.Highcharts) {
window.clearInterval(timer);
callback();
return;
}
if (attempts > 40) {
window.clearInterval(timer);
}
}, 100);
```
Yes they clear at > 40. Fine.
Potential bug: `renderCriticalChart` etc. pass `aria-hidden="false"` only on container in template; fine.
I think the comment set is enough. Total 10 comments.
Also, should I report JSON issue as LOW though plan said HIGH? I'll phrase as low-security hardening with consistent rationale. Actually, since the review plan explicitly asked high, and reviewers might value defense-in-depth, medium might be more appropriate given other modules use json_encode(15). But since technical exploitability is low due to PHP default slash escaping, I'll set severity low.
Wait — I should double check whether Twig is configured with `json_encode` options maybe set to `JSON_HEX_TAG` by default by Twig bridge? Symfony's Twig bridge? Hmm. Not aware. Keep LOW.
Let me write final comments now.
For comment 7 (duplication), severity medium, category maintainability.
For comment 5 (html2canvas): It's actually a known project pattern to include html2canvas statically in many templates; but in this PR both lazy-loader and static include exist; redundancy — suggest keeping lazy. category performance, severity low/medium. I'll choose low since pattern repo-wide is static include; but the redundancy inside same PR is a quality concern. Choose medium? The JS lazy loader ensures it only loads when clicking export — given static load present, all users pay ~1MB. This is a real performance cost. I'll set medium.
Comment 1 severity high; comment 2 high (same bug, separate file anchor maybe redundant; but they help author address). I'll set comment 2 high too. Hmm, having two high comments for the same bug may be fine as they point to the two sides of the mismatch. I'll keep both but each is concise.
Now, formulate final content each in PT-BR.
Make sure to start each comment's first sentence in plain Portuguese about impact.
Comment content lengths: keep moderate.
Let's produce code_comment call.
Tool Calls (1)
code_comment
Show Details
Arguments
{"comments": [{"content": "Clicar em \"Visualizar\" na tabela de pendências não abre detalhe algum: esta função preenche os campos `ssma-ap-action-view-title/id/origin/...` e tenta abrir `openOffcanvasssmaApActionView()`/`#ssmaApActionView`, mas nenhum desses identificadores existe no HTML renderizado nesta PR. O offcanvas criado em `_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig` usa seletores `data-ap-detail` e o id `ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas`, e nem sequer é incluído por algum template — então o fluxo cai no `if (!canvas) return` e o usuário não vê nada. Alinhe o contrato: inclua o partial na tela do Painel e faça esta função preencher os campos `data-ap-detail` existentes (ou busque os detalhes por endpoint), usando o id real do componente para abrir.", "existing_code": " setText('ssma-ap-action-view-title', title);\n setText('ssma-ap-action-view-id', id ? ('#' + id) : '');", "category": "bug", "severity": "high", "path": "public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js"}, {"content": "Este offcanvas de \"Detalhes da ação\" nunca é renderizado: uma busca por `_action_plan_view_offcanvas` no repositório só encontra o próprio arquivo, e nenhum template (nem `_tab_painel`, nem `_tab_action_plan`) faz o include. Consequência direta: o botão \"Visualizar\" da tabela de pendências não tem onde mostrar os detalhes e o usuário fica sem resposta ao clicar. Inclua o partial na tela que usa o botão ou remova-o se o fluxo for atendido por outro componente, e garanta que o JS que popula os campos use os mesmos seletores `data-ap-detail` definidos aqui.", "existing_code": "{% embed 'components/_modal_offcanvas.html.twig' with {\n modal_id: 'ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas',", "category": "bug", "severity": "high", "path": "templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig"}, {"content": "Os insights da Adriana são inseridos como HTML bruto sem escapar o conteúdo (o mesmo vale para `{{ insight|raw }}` no Twig). Como esses textos são gerados a partir dos dados do painel — que incluem títulos, descrições e ocorrências digitadas por usuário —, qualquer trecho com markup que vaze para a análise pode ser executado no navegador de quem abrir o painel. Trate os insights como texto e use `escapeHtml` antes do innerHTML, ou aplique sanitização/allowlist na origem (backend) antes de devolver ao cliente.", "existing_code": " return insights.map(function (item) {\n return '<li>' + item + '</li>';\n }).join('');", "category": "security", "severity": "medium", "path": "public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js"}, {"content": "Este `|raw` injeta o insight (texto gerado por IA a partir de dados do painel, incluindo campos preenchidos por usuários) sem nenhuma sanitização no HTML inicial. Se algum insight ecoar conteúdo não tratado (por exemplo, um título de ação com `<img onerror>`), o navegador interpreta como markup. O padrão já existe no painel de Ocorrências, mas ao replicá-lo aqui é o momento de unificar a regra: backend sanitiza/limita o formato dos insights e o template/JS passam a confiar nesse contrato, sem `|raw` solto.", "existing_code": " <li>{{ insight|raw }}</li>", "category": "security", "severity": "medium", "path": "templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig"}, {"content": "O html2canvas (arquivo de ~1 MB vindo de CDN externa) é baixado toda vez que a aba Painel abre, mesmo para quem nunca exporta — e o `action_plan_panel.js` já implementa `ensureHtml2Canvas()` com carregamento sob demanda, o que torna este include estático redundante (o loader do JS nunca chega a carregar o script). Isso soma custo de banda/render para todos os usuários e adiciona dependência de terceiros sem SRI no fluxo principal. Remova esta tag e deixe o lazy-load incluir a biblioteca apenas no clique em \"Exportar gráficos\".", "existing_code": "<script src=\"https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/html2canvas/1.4.1/html2canvas.min.js\"></script>", "category": "performance", "severity": "medium", "path": "templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel.html.twig"}, {"content": "Este JSON com dados do painel (que incluem títulos e descrições digitados por usuário) é embutido num `<script type=\"application/json\">` sem escapar `<`/`>`. O json_encode do PHP escapa `/`, então a sequência `</script>` costuma ser neutralizada, mas outros pontos do próprio módulo já usam `json_encode(15)` (JSON_HEX_TAG|AMP|APOS|QUOT) ao embutir dados de usuário em JSON (ex.: effectiveness e leadership_evaluation). Adote o mesmo padrão aqui para eliminar qualquer vetor residual de quebra do bloco por `</script>`/`<!--` e manter consistência.", "existing_code": " <script type=\"application/json\" id=\"ssma-ap-panel-data-json\">{{ panel|json_encode|raw }}</script>", "category": "security", "severity": "low", "path": "templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel.html.twig"}, {"content": "`updateKpiRow` e `updateOverviewKpiRow` são cópias quase idênticas (~50 linhas cada), e o mesmo padrão se repete entre este arquivo novo (~3.150 linhas), o CSS novo (~1.250 linhas) e o painel de Ocorrências — atualização de KPIs, bloco Adriana, presets de período e captura/print para PDF. Lógica duplicada entre telas faz correções de bug aplicadas em um lugar não chegarem ao outro. Extraia os comportamentos comuns para helpers compartilhados em `public/js/ssma/` (e regras no CSS) e deixe este arquivo com a orquestração específica da tela.", "existing_code": " function updateOverviewKpiRow(indicators) {", "category": "maintainability", "severity": "medium", "path": "public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js"}, {"content": "`resetCustomSelect` não tem nenhum chamador no repositório (busca por `resetCustomSelect(` retorna vazio), então é código morto que aumenta a superfície de manutenção de um arquivo já grande. Remova a função ou, se ela for necessária para o reset dos filtros customizados, conecte-a ao fluxo que hoje só limpa via `selected_value: ''` no SSR.", "existing_code": " function resetCustomSelect(selectId, defaultLabel) {", "category": "maintainability", "severity": "low", "path": "public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js"}, {"content": "Regras como `.ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns/item`, `.ssma-ap-overview-semantic-icon*` e o bloco `@container ap-ia-inner` não encontram o markup correspondente nos templates desta PR — a análise semântica renderizada usa `.ssma-panel-semantic`/`.ssma-semantic-focus` e não existe `.ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns` em lugar nenhum. São estilos órfãos em um arquivo já com 1.250 linhas; remova as regras sem uso ou vincule-as às classes reais dos elementos.", "existing_code": "#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns {", "category": "maintainability", "severity": "low", "path": "public/css/ssma/action_plan_panel.css"}, {"content": "O arquivo novo usa `var` do início ao fim, em desacordo com a regra do repositório que exige `let`/`const`. Como os scripts legados do SSMA também usam `var`, a decisão parece ser seguir o legado — mas vale alinhar a convenção (ou registrar a exceção) antes que o arquivo cresça ainda mais, já que hoje é só estilo sem efeito funcional.", "existing_code": " var charts = {};", "category": "style", "severity": "low", "path": "public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js"}]}
Result
(async)
Request #16
deepseek-v4-flash
P:127.77K C:1.05K CR:127.74K CW:0
8009ms
Reasoning
All comments placed. Now I should do a final pass of the remaining files that I haven't commented: index.html.twig, _action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig, _tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig. Let me consider if there's anything meaningful to comment on them.
index.html.twig: registers tabs with `tabs_id: 'plano_acao_tabs'` and query param 'tab' plus new `tab_plano_painel_content` include. CSS block with `:has` inside media query. Reasonable. One thing: previously the tab list was named `plano_tabs` (inside template). Any external code referencing '#plano_tabs'? Search earlier found nothing for plano_tabs besides the old template content (now removed). Actually search for `plano_tabs` only returned the rules doc lines 44-46? Wait, that search returned the docs and the file references. It didn't show any JS referencing #plano_tabs. Let me be careful: the search returned lines from `.opencodereview/rules/...` but those matched 'tab_plano_painel'. No other external JS references. OK.
_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig: sets `ov_origin_icons = panel.origin_icons`; fine. There's a DataTable option paging false (already server handled). Pagination footer for SSR initially blank (filled by JS updateOverviewPagination on applyOverviewDom). It is only populated when JS runs `applyOverviewDom` in switchView for visao_geral, or on filter responses. In SSR initial load when panel_default_view is 'visao_geral', switchView calls applyOverviewDom(overviewData) so pagination gets initialized. OK.
One minor: In `_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig`, when table rows >0 SSR but JS not initialized (e.g., if the painel visible at start, JS onPainelTabVisible initializes). fine.
Everything else seems fine; I've reviewed each file:
- action_plan_panel.css: comment #9 + note big file (combined in 7? 9).
- action_plan_panel.js: comments #1, #3, #7, #8, #10.
- index.html.twig: no issue.
- _action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig: no issue.
- _action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig: comment #4.
- _action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig: comment #2.
- _tab_painel.html.twig: comments #5, #6.
- _tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig: no issue found.
I'm done; call task_done.
Revisei cada arquivo do grupo:
- **`public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js`** — contrato de abertura do offcanvas de detalhes quebrado (ids/funções inexistentes vs. `data-ap-detail` do partial), insights injetados sem escape, duplicação interna de `updateKpiRow`/`updateOverviewKpiRow` em arquivo de ~3.150 linhas, `resetCustomSelect` morto e uso generalizado de `var`.
- **`templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig`** — partial órfão: nunca incluído por nenhum template, então o fluxo "Visualizar" não renderiza nada.
- **`templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel.html.twig`** — html2canvas carregado duas vezes (estático + lazy-load) e JSON com dados de usuário embutido via `|raw` sem `JSON_HEX_*`.
- **`templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig`** — `{{ insight|raw }}` sem sanitização, replicando padrão de risco já existente no painel de Ocorrências.
- **`public/css/ssma/action_plan_panel.css`** — regras órfãs (`.ssma-ap-overview-semantic-*`, `@container`) sem markup correspondente num arquivo de 1.250 linhas.
- **`index.html.twig`, `_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig`, `_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig`** — passada de revisão concluída sem achados bloqueantes.
Tool Calls (1)
task_done
Show Details
Arguments
{"state": "DONE"}
Request #17
deepseek-v4-flash
P:69.57K C:10.96K CR:65.54K CW:0
80317ms
Reasoning
Let me analyze the code changes in the review files. I need to review each file individually and identify any real issues not already covered by the confirmed findings.
Let me start by understanding the files:
1. `public/css/ssma/action_plan_panel.css` - New CSS file (~1252 lines)
2. `public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js` - New JS file (~3153 lines)
3. `templates/ssma/action_plan/index.html.twig` - Modified
4. `templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig` - New
5. `templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig` - New
6. `templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig` - New
7. `templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel.html.twig` - New
8. `templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig` - New
Previously confirmed findings (don't repeat):
1. CSS dead rules (overview-semantic-columns etc.)
2. JS: click "Visualizar" doesn't open details (offcanvas never rendered)
3. JS: Adriana insights injected as raw HTML without escaping
4. JS: updateKpiRow/updateOverviewKpiRow duplication
5. JS: resetCustomSelect dead code
6. JS: var usage
7. Twig: |raw on insight
8. Twig: offcanvas never included
9. Twig: html2canvas static include redundant
10. Twig: JSON without escaping
Let me review the files for other issues.
Let me start with the JS file, since it's the biggest. Let me look for issues:
**In `buildFilterParams`:**
```js
if (panelState.unidade && panelState.unidade !== 'todas') {
params.set('unidade', panelState.unidade);
} else {
var viewKey = view || currentView;
if (viewKey === 'visao_geral' && document.getElementById('ap_overview_filter_unit')) {
params.set('unidade', panelState.unidade || 'todas');
} else if (viewKey === 'pendencias' && document.getElementById('ap_painel_filter_unidade')) {
params.set('unidade', panelState.unidade || 'todas');
}
}
```
Hmm, this logic — if unidade is empty and no element found, unidade is not set at all. If the view is 'pendencias', panelState.unidade comes from syncPendenciasFilterState which sets 'todas' if empty. Wait — the logic is a bit odd, but let me look at sync functions.
Actually, there may be an issue in that `panelState.unidade` default is `''`. In `buildFilterParams`, when unidade is empty string, it will add `unidade=todas` if the element exists. That seems intended for network head filters. Not a big deal.
**Potential bug in `updatePendenciasTable`:** The function calls `window.MetahumanDataTables.whenReady('ssma-ap-panel-table', ...)`. On every filter application, this could re-create DataTable. But they check isDataTable before creation. Fine.
Wait, but there is a subtle bug: After `clear().destroy()`, they set innerHTML with rows. Then they call whenReady callback which recreates datatable. But `whenReady` might already have resolved earlier (since the table was already initialized before destroy). If whenReady caches the promise resolution, then callback runs immediately. OK.
**In `renderOriginChart` tooltip:** uses `this.point.percentage`. For column chart where data points don't have `percentage` assigned except via explicit property, `point.percentage` is computed by Highcharts as percent of stacked total. Fine. But the data is `{ y: r.value, percentage: r.percentage }`. Highcharts column chart non-stacked: point.percentage refers to percentage of the total of the series (per point / total). Should be OK.
**`dataLabels` formatter** in renderOriginChart references `this.point.percentage != null` — uses `!=` (not strict). Rule says use strict equality. Also uses `String(row.percentage)` etc. Minor style though, project rules flag equality `==`/`!=`. There are many instances of `!=`/`==` throughout the file. This is a minor style issue (already var covered). Let me note that maybe not important.
**In `buildHBarChart`:**
```js
var yMax = Math.max(opts.yMax || 20, Math.ceil(maxVal / 2) * 2);
```
Hmm, if data has value > yMax, yMax grows. fine.
**`chartHeight`:** categories.length * rowHeight + chromeHeight. OK.
**In `renderCriticalChart`:** no data labels disabled. OK.
**Now let me consider the `switchView` for pendencias default and `triggerPanelFilter`:
In `onPainelTabVisible`, at the end:
```js
if (!panelData || !panelData.charts) {
triggerPanelFilter(currentView);
} else {
var ssrLabels = (...);
if (!ssrLabels.length) {
triggerPanelFilter(currentView);
}
}
```
But there's also logic when currentView is not pendencias? If default view is visao_geral, then panelData.charts may be present (from SSR) — it triggers filter only if critical labels empty. Hmm, but for visao_geral, the filter endpoint should be called to get overview. Actually there's also `bindViewPills` which triggers when clicking a pill. On first load with default view visao_geral, does it trigger the overview filter? The code `triggerPanelFilter(currentView)` only when panelData.charts is missing or critical labels empty. If default view is visao_geral and panelData.overview empty but panelData.charts present, then no filter would trigger for visao_geral initially. Possibly a bug but uncertain. Also `switchView(currentView)` is called. Let's not speculate too much.
**applyFilterResponse for visao_geral:**
```js
if (resp.view === 'visao_geral') {
mergePanelData({ overview: resp.panel.overview || {} });
applyOverviewDom(resp.panel.overview || {});
destroyOverviewCharts();
overviewChartsRendered = false;
renderOverviewCharts();
return;
}
```
Note `renderOverviewCharts` checks the section visibility:
```js
var section = document.querySelector('[data-ap-panel-view="visao_geral"]');
if (!section || section.classList.contains('d-none')) {
return;
}
```
OK if view is active.
**Consider `panelState.unidade` in buildFilterParams for 'visao_geral' view - syncOverviewFilterState only sets unit from ap_overview_filter_unit element. But in `buildFilterParams` for view 'visao_geral', if the element `ap_overview_filter_unit` exists, sets unidade=todas when empty.
Hmm wait, there's a subtle issue: When view is 'pendencias' but `panelState.unidade` is '' (element not present for non-network-head users), then no unidade param set. Good.
**Another possible issue in `runPanelFilterRequest`:** `fetch` — no CSRF needed for GET. OK.
**`bindPendenciasFilters`** registers delegated change handler:
```js
$(document).on('change', '#ap_painel_filter_team, ...', function (e) {
if (e.originalEvent && typeof window.setCustomSelectValue === 'function') {
window.setCustomSelectValue(this.id, this.value);
}
...
});
```
Fine.
**Period presets duplicates:** `syncApPainelPeriodPresetUI(defaultPreset)` is called in bindPendenciasPeriodPopover and onPainelTabVisible calls it again. Fine.
**The axis map `updateAxisOptionsForPeriod` uses `panelState.period`:** When applyApPainelPeriodPreset calls updateAxisOptionsForPeriod(panelState.period), panelState.period was updated by refreshApPanelPeriodLabel -> set to param. OK.
Potential issue: when a user selects custom date range in pendencias and clicks preset button (e.g., week), applyApPainelPeriodPreset → syncApPainelPeriodPresetUI(preset). OK.
**Issue: `getApPanelPeriodParam` returns 'pend:range:...' for custom.** In buildFilterParams, `params.set('period', getApPanelPeriodParam())`. Backend presumably understands 'pend:range:...'. Not our concern.
**Check `refreshApPeriodPresetState` and preset data-preset values.** For custom mode, no active preset. OK.
**Now, `bindOverviewPagination`:** `container.addEventListener('click', ...)`. When filter response comes back, `applyOverviewDom` calls `updateOverviewPagination(...)` which sets numbersEl innerHTML with new buttons (no re-bind needed since delegated). Good.
But wait: In `updateOverviewPagination`, if total === 0, pagesToRender = [1], activePage = 1. The button for page 1 is created with class 'active current'. Clicking it: pageNum=1, but total===0 so return. fine.
**Consider the duplicated function `updateKpiRow` vs `updateOverviewKpiRow`** - confirmed finding #4. Skip.
**Now check `captureCardSectionForPrint` and print: `iframe.srcdoc` — srcdoc content with data URLs can be big. Not blocking.
**`ensureHtml2Canvas` load from CDN on demand + static include already confirmed finding #9.
Let me search other files to see references.
Actually, since only these files are in the review group, and context tools are for background only. I can still search the repo for cross-reference confirmation.
Let me now look at each twig template for issues:
**_tab_painel.html.twig:**
- The `_tab_painel` includes the offcanvas? No — it doesn't include `_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig`. Confirmed finding #8 says the offcanvas is never rendered. So the "Visualizar" button does nothing. Confirmed finding #2/#8. Also `_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig` partial — is it used anywhere? Let me search. It's a new partial file. If not referenced anywhere, it's dead code too. Let me check whether it's included by other templates. Search the repo for `_action_plan_responsible_icons` or `responsible_icons`. Since only file listing is within review group; maybe other templates (in _tab_action_plan) reference it but not part of diff. Let me search.
Let me use the tools to search for usage of these partials and check on the structure. But the review group only includes listed files; context searches help confirm.
Let me search for the partials and offcanvas references.
Let me examine other potential issues.
**index.html.twig changes:**
New tab structure. `planoAcaoTabs` default `ssmaPlanoAcaoActiveTab|default('tab_plano_acoes')`. The tabs component include passes `'query_tab_param': 'tab'`. Since these tabs use server-side default tab & query param handling presumably by tabs component (maybe client-side too). OK.
Now consider: previously the header had tabs only if permissions; now also always add painel tab for everyone. But that's intended.
One concern: `defaultPlanoTab` uses `ssmaPlanoAcaoActiveTab` variable, probably from controller. If the query param tab = tab_plano_painel but user lacks permission? Painel is available to all users who can access the page. It's fine.
But wait: In the old template, tab divs for config/permissions were hidden unless permission. Painel content always rendered server-side with `action_plan_panel_data`. That data may be expensive? Not necessarily.
**Potential issue: `_tab_painel.html.twig` references `ssma_plano_acao_panel_filter` route.** Fine.
**Now, `_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig`:**
- `{% set _ctx = context|default('action_plan') %}` used in data-context.
- Questions title always shows "Perguntas sugeridas".
- `{{ q }}` in span text is auto-escaped by Twig (not raw), good.
- `title="{{ q }}"` - Twig escapes by default with html context? Inside an attribute, Twig's autoescape uses 'html' which escapes `"` to `"`, etc. Good.
- `data-question="{{ q|e('html_attr') }}"` good.
But there's a subtlety: The JS builds question cards in `buildAdrianaQuestionsHtml` uses escapeHtml(question) — good.
**`buildAdrianaInsightsHtml`** inserts `'<li>' + item + '</li>'` raw — confirmed finding #3.
**Partial _action_plan_semantic_adriana:_insights rendering uses `{{ insight|raw }}`** — confirmed finding #7.
**Now look for other XSS:** In the Twig table, cells built with `{{ row.title }}` etc. are escaped. The action_cell `data-action-id="{{ row.id }}"` auto-escaped. In JS `buildPendenciasTableRowHtml`, attributes use escapeHtml. Good.
However, in `_tab_painel.html.twig`, `<script type="application/json" id="ssma-ap-panel-data-json">{{ panel|json_encode|raw }}</script>` confirmed finding #10 (partial). Let me not repeat.
**Check period popovers**: `_tab_painel` uses `include 'components/ui/_custom_select.html.twig'`. Fine.
**Potential issue: The overview filters have origin options referencing `ov_filters.origin`. In pendencias filters, the origin options are also used. OK.
**`ap_painel_unidade_options` and selected 'todas'.**
**Issue: `panel_default_view` 'comparativo':** In the pills, all three views rendered; filter row for pendencias shown only if default_view == 'pendencias' else d-none d-lg-flex absent. Actually the code: `class="... d-none{% if panel_default_view == 'pendencias' %} d-lg-flex{% endif %}"`. If default is comparativo, the row remains d-none. Good. `toggleHeaderFilters` also toggles on switching.
Wait — But if panel_default_view is 'pendencias', but the config JSON `defaultPeriod` etc. The initial `panel_default_view = panel.default_view|default('pendencias')`. In JS `currentView` initial from activePill data-view. In SSR HTML, only one pill has is-active: if default is comparativo but SSR data table shows pendencias content? Data-ap-panel-view sections toggled via `d-none` class if not default. The content for pendencias is shown only if default is pendencias. If default is comparativo, pendencias content has d-none. OK.
But note: SSR renders `pendencias` content (KPIs, table) into DOM even when the default view is comparativo (hidden via d-none), that's a lot of unnecessary markup but okay.
Wait actually for pendencias view: `<div data-ap-panel-view="pendencias"{% if panel_default_view != 'pendencias' %} class="d-none"{% endif %}>`. It's rendered but hidden. Fine.
**Potential issue in CSS `:has()`**: `.modern-header:has(.app-tabs-bar)` uses :has which may not be supported in older browsers, but that's just progressive enhancement in index.html.twig.
**Now check the JS for some functional bugs I should confirm.**
Let me review important areas:
1. `updatePendenciasTable`: after rows are updated, calls `bindTableViewButtons()` then checks whenReady. If DataTable already active, they destroy and clear. But they do this check at beginning:
```js
if ($ && $.fn && $.fn.DataTable && $.fn.DataTable.isDataTable('#ssma-ap-panel-table')) {
$('#ssma-ap-panel-table').DataTable().clear().destroy();
}
```
Note `.clear().destroy()` on a destroyed DataTable is fine. Then innerHTML set to rows, then whenReady recreates.
But this recreation happens on every filter change. If there are no rows (tableData.rows empty), the tbody.innerHTML = '' — then table re-created with empty data (language emptyTable). OK.
2. `applyPendenciasDom` calls `updateAxisFilterOptions((panel.charts || {}).critical_pending_by_deadline || {})` — then update table with page_length maybe 10.
3. `buildFilterParams`: For pendencias view when `mine` filter checked. `panelState.mine` toggled.
Wait: For 'visao_geral', mine isn't included (fine per requirement).
4. `syncPendenciasFilterState` reads `panelState.origin = getSelectValue('ap_painel_filter_origem');` But there's an issue: For SSR, the pendencias filter has the origin custom select. But `panelState.origin` also used in `buildFilterParams` for visao_geral:
```js
} else if ((view || currentView) === 'visao_geral') {
...
if (panelState.origin) {
params.set('origin', panelState.origin);
}
}
```
But syncOverviewFilterState reads `panelState.origin = getSelectValue('ap_overview_filter_origin')`. So depending on view, origin comes from different elements. That's fine because on switch to overview, bindViewPills triggers syncOverviewFilterState.
But hold on: When switching to 'pendencias' via pill, does it sync pendencias filters and trigger a filter? Look at bindViewPills:
```js
switchView(viewId);
if (viewId === 'visao_geral') {
syncOverviewFilterState();
triggerPanelFilter('visao_geral');
}
```
So when switching to pendencias, it does NOT trigger a filter (relies on cached panelData). Only initial pendencias load triggers when no SSR data. That's okay since pendencias data is SSR. But after a filter applied on pendencias, then switch to overview (filters empty) → triggers overview fetch. Then switch back to pendencias → displays SSR cached panelData? Actually panelData merged pendencias values remain. Fine.
But note: After switching to pendencias with cached SSR data, the pendencias filters that were modified might not have been re-applied because there's no trigger. Actually changing a filter triggers it. So state consistent.
5. Wait, there's a concern: On switchView('pendencias'), they do `destroyOverviewCharts(); renderPendenciasCharts();`. renderPendenciasCharts checks section not d-none. Good.
6. But `renderPendenciasCharts` doesn't call `applyPendenciasDom`; it relies on cached data being in DOM. When SSR data present and filters unchanged, ok.
7. Hmm — but when default view is pendencias and SSR chart labels present but the user changes the axis, triggerPanelFilter('pendencias') fetches & calls applyPendenciasDom which updates DOM & charts. OK.
8. **Now there's a subtle bug in switchView for comparativo**: If user is on pendencias and switches to comparativo, `destroyPendenciasCharts()` runs, then since not visao_geral, `destroyOverviewCharts()`. Then triggers filter 'comparativo' → runPanelFilterRequest → buildFilterParams('comparativo') sets period = overviewPeriod. Then applyFilterResponse: for comparativo it goes to `renderComparativoView`. Good.
But wait: `applyFilterResponse` for comparativo first goes through the pendencias branch? No:
```js
if (resp.view === 'visao_geral') {...}
if (resp.view === 'comparativo') { renderComparativoView(...); return; }
mergePanelData(resp.panel);
...
applyPendenciasDom(resp.panel);
renderPendenciasCharts();
```
If resp.view is 'comparativo' but the section is d-none; rendering pendencias DOM would not happen since comparativo handled before. OK.
9. **Important: race conditions with renderOverviewCharts after filter.** OK.
10. **Issue in `applyOverviewPeriodFromInputs` with max = today:** It doesn't validate start<=today but inputs max. fine.
11. **Potential issue: `parseInputDate` treats value '2026-02-31' as valid (JS rolls over).** For month-end boundaries not an issue. Minor.
12. **Bug in `diffDaysInclusive`** fine.
13. **Overview period presets: data-label attribute not used. fine.
14. In `_tab_painel.html.twig`, for the overview filter period presets they read `ov_filters.period_presets`. In JS `applyOverviewPeriodPreset` triggers. OK.
Now important: **Check `renderComparativoView` fallback not used for 'comparativo' pill when data has units:** table rendered directly inside `ssma-ap-comparativo-root`. But CSS class `ssma-ap-view-placeholder` applies dashed border; table inside root div... The root div itself has placeholder styling with dashed border and padding 48px. When content replaced with table inside the same root, the root still has the placeholder styles (border dashed, padding, background) and text-align center, giving a weird look but not a functional bug.
Wait actually in renderComparativoView, they set `root.innerHTML = '<p>...</p><div class="table-responsive">...table...'`. The root element retains class `ssma-ap-view-placeholder`, giving dashed border, background #fafbfc and padding 48px. That makes the table look like placeholder but still visible. Could be considered a styling bug but minor.
15. **`buildPrintDocumentHtml` and `srcdoc`:** iframe.srcdoc = printHtml. Data URL images embedded base64 PNG. Fine.
16. **`setExportChartsBtnLoading`** toggles.
17. **Check `ensureDistributionChartsForExport`:** references functions initSsmaActionPlanCharts etc. from other files (distribution charts). If not present, `reflowDistributionCharts` checks typeof. fine.
18. **Highcharts chart export sections getTable etc.** `gaugeValueFromDom` reading from DOM `.ssma-gauge-center-value`. Depends on the gauge markup.
Now look at the CSS file for actual issues not mentioned:
CSS uses `color-mix(...)` — newer CSS function, may not be supported in older browsers; minor.
There is `@container ap-ia-inner (min-width: 560px)` — container queries. Supported in modern browsers; and `.ssma-ap-ia-inner-body` has container-type: inline-size. But the semantic-adriana row (with ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns etc.) is inside a different container than ap-ia-inner. The confirmed finding #1 covers dead selectors.
Look for other possible CSS issues: Duplicate `.ssma-ap-*`. Fine.
In CSS there is:
```css
#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .mhs-table-card[data-table-card-id="ssma-ap-overview-table"] { ... }
```
Fine.
Now check that both `_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig` and JS reference matching IDs: overview KPI row id `ssma-ap-overview-kpi-row`. Yes.
Check overview pagination: JS `updateOverviewPagination` uses container `ssma-ap-overview-pagination`, infoEl `ssma-ap-overview-pagination-info`, numbersEl `ssma-ap-overview-page-numbers`. Twig template has these ids. Good.
Per-page select `ssma-ap-overview-per-page`. Good.
`updateOverviewTable` uses table `ssma-ap-overview-table`. Yes.
But wait — DataTable for overview table: In Twig, the `_table_card` component is included with `paging:false` etc. But the JS `updateOverviewTable` doesn't destroy the DataTable before replacing tbody content! Let's check:
```js
function updateOverviewTable(overview) {
var table = document.getElementById('ssma-ap-overview-table');
...
var tbody = table.querySelector('tbody');
...
tbody.innerHTML = rows.map(...).join('');
}
```
If the DataTable component wraps the table in `.dataTable` with pagination etc., setting innerHTML on tbody may break the DataTable? The DataTable config has paging:false, so there's no pagination wrapper created by DataTables. Actually DataTables still wraps table into a structure with wrapper div containing a header/footer? DataTables adds a wrapper `<div class="dataTables_wrapper ...">` around the table. Modifying tbody.innerHTML directly is okay while the table is still a DataTable? DataTables caches row data; but since paging/ordering/searching disabled and no paging, the display still reflects DOM? Actually DataTables for client-side data reads rows at initialization and then may manage them; if you set tbody.innerHTML without calling DataTables APIs, subsequent draw might revert. But since searching/ordering/paging disabled, DataTables doesn't redraw often. It may be okay visually.
Hmm, but since JS updateOverviewTable replaces tbody HTML each filter, and DataTable was initialized server-side rendering with paging false. Could be a subtle issue, but likely not visible. Let me check whether _table_card component initializes DataTables by default for the overview. The datatable_options include `paging:false`, `ordering:false`, `searching:false`, `lengthChange:false`, `info:false`. So DataTables will create a wrapper but no pagination. Direct innerHTML replacement inside tbody remains in DOM and visible because DataTables isn't re-rendering. OK not blocking.
Now potential mismatch: JS `updateOverviewTable` empty state uses colspan=8 and sets innerHTML; then pagination update in applyOverviewDom.
Now check `updateOverviewKpiRow`:
It replaces `col-xl-3` with `col-xl` in buildKpiCardHtml. CSS `.ssma-ap-overview-kpi-row > [class*="col-xl"]` flex 1. OK.
Now an important functional bug candidate: In `renderOverviewCharts`, after filter response, applyFilterResponse → destroyOverviewCharts(); renderOverviewCharts();. renderOverviewCharts depends on overview from panelData. mergePanelData already merges overview.
But mergePanelData merges only if overview is object; then applyOverviewDom; then renderOverviewCharts reads getOverviewData() which returns panelData.overview. Good.
However, renderOverviewCharts calls `initDistributionCharts()` which calls `window.initSsmaActionPlanCharts()`. This presumably renders the bar charts + gauges in the overview (ssma-action-plan-type-bar, etc.). These charts are part of another JS file (probably `action_plan.js`). But renderOverviewCharts only when Highcharts ready.
But there's a subtle bug: In `switchView('visao_geral')`, they call `applyOverviewDom(overviewData)` then `renderOverviewCharts()` which calls initDistributionCharts() to initialize distribution bar charts. But bar charts auto_init false in template; initSsmaActionPlanCharts presumably initializes them with data from SSR. Since distribution charts data (`action_plan_data`) doesn't change with overview filters, they can be initialized once. OK.
**Now check `applyApPanelPeriodPreset` uses updateAxisOptionsForPeriod(panelState.period)** — updateAxisOptionsForPeriod normalizes 'pend:range' → 'last_3_months'? Actually:
```js
var normalized = (period || '').replace(/^pend:/, '').replace(/^range:.*$/, 'last_3_months');
if (/^range:/.test(period)) {
normalized = 'last_3_months';
}
```
For period 'next_month' → normalized 'next_month'. For 'pend:range:...' → first replace strips pend: prefix leaving 'range:...', second replace matches ^range:.* → 'last_3_months'. So normalized 'last_3_months'. Hmm, for a custom pendencias range, axes default to weekly/monthly? But backend maybe maps 'range' differently. Actually for pendencias period custom range may be any length; axis options for arbitrary range not well-defined. This mapping to 'last_3_months' axes (weekly/monthly) is approximate. Not blocking.
For 'all_future' normalized 'all_future' → axes weekly/monthly. OK.
Wait: `updateAxisOptionsForPeriod` is passed `period` param from `applyApPainelPeriodPreset(preset)`:
```js
function applyApPainelPeriodPreset(preset) {
syncApPainelPeriodPresetUI(preset);
updateAxisOptionsForPeriod(panelState.period);
...
}
```
syncApPainelPeriodPresetUI sets apPainelPeriodMode and calls refreshApPanelPeriodLabel which sets panelState.period = getApPanelPeriodParam(). For preset 'next_month', param = 'next_month'. So axis list daily/weekly. OK.
But note: at page load in onPainelTabVisible: `updateAxisOptionsForPeriod(panelState.period || 'next_month')` where panelState.period default 'next_month'. axes daily/weekly. But the SSR axis select is populated by backend axes from critical_pending_by_deadline.axes with selected default axis 'weekly' (config defaultAxis weekly). After updateAxisOptionsForPeriod, options replaced. Current select.value = 'weekly' (from SSR option selected). new options for next_month: daily, weekly; weekly present → keep weekly selected. Good.
Then `syncPendenciasFilterState` reads axis from select → weekly. But wait on load, syncPendenciasFilterState isn't called until a filter event? Actually initial triggerPanelFilter? If SSR labels present, no initial filter. Fine.
**Now consider `syncPendenciasFilterState` reads `getSelectValue('ssma-ap-chart-axis-filter')`. At pendencias filter change event, the panelState.axis set. OK.
Alright.
Let me consider the duplicated id issue: In index.html.twig tabs component uses 'tabs_id': 'plano_acao_tabs'. The `observePainelTab` JS in action_plan_panel.js listens `#plano_acao_tabs .app-tab-link` clicks. But wait — action_plan_panel.js runs in _tab_painel which is inside the tab content; it should be loaded regardless. OK.
Also the old `_tab_action_plan` may bind its own tab events on a different id `plano_tabs`? They renamed to `plano_acao_tabs`; other JS referencing `plano_tabs` may break. Let me search repo for `plano_tabs` references. If there is JS in action_plan.js that hooks '#plano_tabs' events, renaming breaks it. Search.
Let me also confirm that `_tab_painel` includes scripts: html2canvas static + action_plan_panel.js. Those scripts are loaded when this tab content included. Since all tab content panels are in the same page (only toggled via display), scripts load once on page load. Good.
Let me run some searches to confirm cross-references.
Potential issues to verify:
- The offcanvas partial `_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig` never included → already confirmed (#8). But is `_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig` used? Possibly also dead code. Let me search.
- Also the twig `components/_modal_offcanvas.html.twig` referenced with modal id `ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas` but JS references `openOffcanvasssmaApActionView`. Search the repo for `ssmaApActionView` to confirm what exists. The offcanvas partial creates an offcanvas with an id... but embed block. There might be an open function elsewhere. But the partial is never included anyway.
Search for these identifiers across repo.
Let me run searches:
- `_action_plan_view_offcanvas`
- `ssmaApActionView`
- `_action_plan_responsible_icons`
- `js-ssma-ap-responsible-tooltip`
- `plano_tabs` (old id)
- `plano_acao_tabs`
- `ssmaPlanoAcaoActiveTab`
- `action_plan_panel_data`
- `ssma-ap-panel-table` row rendering.
Let me do those searches to confirm.
Additionally, inspect `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` to see if it references the new responsible icons partial etc. Since files outside review group are context. Let me find them.
Let me search for the actual templates. Use file_find and code_search.
Given we should provide code comments only for files in review group. Let me proceed.
Let me think about the JS file line count: 3153 lines, huge. And CSS 1252. There's already a finding about duplicate code & size (#4). We can note additional maintainability concerns if there's something else major.
Let me now check for actual bug in JS: In `updateKpiRow` when cards length > 0 and kpis length > cards length, extra KPIs ignored, but the row col wrappers remain from SSR. The row initially contains col-xl-3 wrappers each containing mhs-card. On update, cards.length == kpis length typically. Fine.
Another potential functional bug: In `applyFilterResponse` for visao_geral, after applying overview DOM and rendering charts, the SSR overview table with DataTable `paging:false` but server pagination handled manually via pagination element. But updateOverviewTable destroys? It doesn't destroy the DataTable; it replaces the tbody content. If the DataTable instance exists (from server-side init), direct DOM mutation may be OK for display. Fine.
Now the issue: `_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig` — The overview DataTable options include paging:false, info:false, lengthChange:false. Since pagination is done server-side with custom footer. That seems okay.
But wait: `_table_card` default may apply client-side search/ordering, but disabled here. Fine.
Now a likely bug: In `_tab_painel.html.twig`, the view pills markup:
```twig
{% for view in panel.view_sections|default([]) %}
```
But config JSON defaultPeriod etc. rely on variables panel.*. Data sections rely on pendencias SSR content, but if backend doesn't return `panel` data with all required keys, template default handles.
Hmm.
Now consider the container queries / CSS: already covered.
Let me focus and check specific bugs:
**Bug candidate A:** In `buildFilterParams`, when view is 'comparativo', params only include period from overview. And also includes team/vinculo/unidade from panelState which are pendencias filter values (panelState.team/vinculo/unidade shared). Actually panelState.team is shared; syncOverviewFilterState sets team too (overview team filter). So when switching to comparativo, filters values may be stale from whichever view last synced. But comparativo fetch happens on switch; if user was on pendencias with team filter set, comparativo gets team too — maybe desired or not. Not sure.
**Bug candidate B:** In `_tab_painel.html.twig`, custom select for filter team etc. loaded with `loading_enabled: true`. There might be network loads.
**Bug candidate C:** Highcharts chart in `renderOriginChart`: uses dataLabels showing "y (pct%)" with point.percentage. But for the column chart, point.percentage is computed relative to series total (stacking). Actually for non-stacked column, `point.percentage` = y / total of all points in the series * 100. But they set `percentage: r.percentage` on each point data. Highcharts will use point.percentage property if set? For column chart, percentage is normally computed when stacking enabled. In tooltip pointFormat they reference `{point.percentage:.1f}%` and dataLabels formatter uses `this.point.percentage`. If backend provides r.percentage, they set data point as object {y, percentage}. Highcharts stores extra properties on point.options? Actually point.percentage would be overridden during render if stacking; otherwise? I'm not 100% sure the custom `percentage` property survives onto point.percentage. In non-stacked column charts, `point.percentage` is set when stackLabels/percentage tooltip are used? Highcharts computes `point.percentage` in column series: It's `this.y / this.series.getTotal() * 100`? There's a helper `point.percentage` used for stacked. For non-stacked, I think percentage is also computed? In tooltip default for column, you see "Percentage" if include. Actually there's `getPercentage`? Highcharts sets percentage for column/bar only when `stacking` is normal or percent? Hmm.
But the dataLabels formatter first checks `this.point.percentage != null` and uses it; else returns '0'. If backend provides percentage property, the point.options includes percentage but `point.percentage` is a Highcharts-generated property. For non-stacked series Highcharts may compute `point.percentage` at draw time only for stackable series? Let me not overanalyze—maybe it works. Not certain; avoid speculation.
**Bug candidate D:** `computeHBarSizing` etc fine.
**Bug candidate E:** `formatDecimalBr(value)` does String(value).replace('.', ',') — value is numeric y; fine.
**Bug candidate F:** In `renderCriticalChart` and others they call `destroyChart('critical')` then check data. Good.
**Bug candidate G:** Missing cleanup of charts when DOM elements are replaced? Not relevant.
**Bug candidate H:** In `switchView` for viewId === 'comparativo', they call destroyOverviewCharts() then triggerPanelFilter. But renderPendenciasCharts uses Highcharts; if user switch back pendencias they call renderPendenciasCharts which draws from panelData; if panelData charts exist good.
**Bug candidate I:** On initial load with default view 'visao_geral' and SSR overview present but pendencias charts SSR present too? triggerPanelFilter(currentView) where currentView = 'visao_geral'. If SSR panelData.charts exists and has labels, then no overview filter fetch. This means overview filter not fetched even though SSR overview may be for default period only; user could then change filters which triggers fetch. But if SSR didn't include overview data? then overview DOM empty placeholders. This is speculative.
Now, since there are already confirmed findings #1-10 covering many issues, I should try to find NEW distinct real issues in files.
Let me search the repository for references to confirm which other things are truly missing or dead.
Key things to check:
1. `_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig` used anywhere?
2. `ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas` used?
3. The old id `plano_tabs` referenced in other JS/Twig files that might break with rename to `plano_acao_tabs`?
4. The `js-ssma-ap-responsible-tooltip` or `member-by-id` variables used in responsible icons partial.
5. Check `_tab_painel` references `teams` variable and `allMembers` and `member_by_id`; may not be passed in `_tab_painel` include.
Also possible issue: In `_tab_painel.html.twig`, `panel` variable shadows the outer? The template receives `action_plan_panel_data` set as `panel`. That means inside include of `_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig`, uses `panel.overview`. But `_tab_painel.html.twig` sets `{% set panel = action_plan_panel_data|default({}) %}` at top, then includes partials with specific keys. Fine. In `_tab_painel_visao_geral`, references `panel.origin_icons` — variable `panel` still in scope from parent include context. Twig includes inherit context, so panel visible. OK.
Let's check whether `_tab_painel.html.twig` passes `action_plan_panel_data` from the controller to render the tab panel. That's server-side.
Now the responsible icons partial expects `member_by_id`, `action_item`, etc. It might be intended to be included within the table `_tab_action_plan` (the actions list) — not within panel. Search the repo for its usage. If unused, dead code → new finding (like confirmed #8 but for a different partial).
Let me run code searches.
Also check the JS references to elements that might not exist:
- `ssmaApPanelSetPeriod` used? (global exposure)
- `window.openOffcanvasssmaApActionView` — confirmed missing.
- `updateRecommendationBlock` uses `.ssma-ap-semantic-summary` inside pendencias panel — that exists in the recommendation block markup. Wait, the recommendation block markup has `<p class="ssma-ap-semantic-summary mb-0">{{ panel.recommendation.text }}`. And `updateRecommendationBlock` selects `[data-ap-panel-view="pendencias"] .ssma-ap-recommendation-header + .ssma-ap-semantic-summary`. In markup, `<p class="ssma-ap-semantic-summary mb-0">` is directly after the header div `.ssma-ap-recommendation-header`. Yes matches.
- `updateOperationalSummary` selects container `.ssma-ap-operational-summary` in pendencias panel. Yes.
- In updateOperationalSummary, they replace innerHTML including title "Resumo Operacional". Fine.
- `ssma-ap-semantic-adriana-pendencias` row exists via partial include. In renderSemanticAdrianaRow, query `[data-ap-semantic-content]`, `[data-ap-adriana-insights]`, `[data-ap-adriana-questions]` inside row. Partial defines these data attributes? Let's re-read partial. In semantic partial:
- `<div class="ssma-panel-semantic" data-ap-semantic-content>` Yes.
- insights list `<ol class="ssma-panel-adriana-insights ssma-adriana-insights-list mb-0" data-ap-adriana-insights>` Yes.
- questions grid `<div class="suggestions-grid ssma-adriana-questions-grid ssma-panel-adriana" data-ap-adriana-questions>` Yes.
BUT there's a catch: in partial, when `_no_data` is true, the insights & questions containers aren't rendered; instead empty state markup. When JS later updates via AJAX after data becomes available, contentEl/insightsEl/questionsEl may be null in the empty state. renderSemanticAdrianaRow checks null and skips; so new data won't show after previously empty SSR state... Wait but contentEl (data-ap-semantic-content) is always present (contains empty state inside). insightsEl is only present when NOT _no_data OR _insights length? Let's trace:
```
{% if _no_data and _insights|length == 0 %}
empty block (no data-ap-adriana-insights element)
{% else %}
<ol ... data-ap-adriana-insights>...
```
So when SSR empty (no semantic & no adriana), the insights `<ol data-ap-adriana-insights>` does not exist. After JS filter response returns actual data, updateSemanticAdriana → renderSemanticAdrianaRow:
- contentEl exists (data-ap-semantic-content) - it will get content innerHTML replaced (with new semantic).
- insightsEl null → skip; questionsEl null → skip. So newly returned insights/questions won't be injected because the container wasn't rendered.
Hmm wait, but if SSR empty state: contentEl contains empty-state; insightsEl missing; questionsEl missing? Let's check the questions block:
```
{% if _no_data and _questions|length == 0 %}
<p>As perguntas aparecerão aqui...</p>
{% else %}
<div class="suggestions-grid ..." data-ap-adriana-questions>...
```
So yes, when empty, no `data-ap-adriana-questions` container.
So the JS `renderSemanticAdrianaRow` updates contentEl only, but does not rebuild the adriana insights/questions DOM when SSR empty. This is a real bug: after the panel initially renders with empty semantic/adriana data and then a user applies filters returning data, the insights/questions sections remain in the empty state.
But wait — is the row even included when SSR empty? The partial shows the adriana card always, with empty state message. Actually if _no_data, `_no_data and _insights|length==0` true → shows empty message "💤". Also content empty state in left card. So yes.
However, in practice, the SSR may include panel.adriana always even empty arrays, meaning _no_data true → empty state markup. Then when filter fetch returns data with insights, the DOM containers for insights don't exist → JS won't update. The UI would still show empty state. That's a functional bug in update path when the SSR initial state was empty.
Hold on — Let me re-read renderSemanticAdrianaRow more carefully.
```js
function renderSemanticAdrianaRow(rowId, viewMode, semantic, adriana, context) {
var row = document.getElementById(rowId);
if (!row) return;
var contentEl = row.querySelector('[data-ap-semantic-content]');
var insightsEl = row.querySelector('[data-ap-adriana-insights]');
var questionsEl = row.querySelector('[data-ap-adriana-questions]');
...
if (contentEl) { contentEl.innerHTML = ...; }
var insights = ...;
var questions = ...;
if (insightsEl) { insightsEl.innerHTML = buildAdrianaInsightsHtml(insights, emptyBody); }
if (questionsEl) { questionsEl.innerHTML = buildAdrianaQuestionsHtml(questions, context); }
}
```
Yes, if the containers aren't in the DOM (empty SSR state), the insights and questions won't be shown after updates. So there's a hidden bug. However, this is a somewhat subtle "state transition" bug. Given the data typically available, could matter. This is a genuine finding but may be somewhat deep. The significance: empty → data transition never populates the insights/questions in the Adriana card. But since JS typically re-filters on the default view only if SSR labels empty, if default SSR had no semantic data but charts labels exist, no initial fetch... then the empty state remains until user changes filter. When user changes a filter and gets data, insights wouldn't appear. That's a real bug.
I might report this. Severity medium. Category bug.
Let me double check the contentEl always present: In partial, `<div class="ssma-panel-semantic" data-ap-semantic-content>` wraps the `{% if _no_data %} include empty {% else %} semantic content{% endif %}`. Yes always.
But actually when semantic exists but adriana is empty (insights/questions empty), the else branch creates `<ol data-ap-adriana-insights>` containing `<li>{{ _empty_body }}</li>` because the for-else inside renders fallback list item inside the ol. So insightsEl exists, questionsEl exists (else branch because `_no_data` false). So the transition bug only applies when both are empty initially.
OK. Another possible genuine bug candidate: In `applyPendenciasDom`, the recommendation block update only updates text of `.ssma-ap-semantic-summary` right after `.ssma-ap-recommendation-header`. Fine.
Let's look at the `kpiFooterText` building uses item.value etc.
Alright. Let me search the codebase for things.
Also we should examine potential mismatch: CSS `.ssma-ap-chart-axis-filter` not styled? `.ssma-ap-chart-month-select select, #ssma-ap-chart-axis-filter { ... }` in template inline style. fine.
Let me run searches now to confirm dead partial / ids.
Let me search for:
1. `_action_plan_responsible_icons`
2. `_action_plan_view_offcanvas`
3. `plano_tabs` / `plano_acao_tabs`
4. `member_by_id`
5. `js-ssma-ap-responsible-tooltip`
6. `ssmaPlanoAcaoActiveTab`
7. `action_plan_panel_data`
8. `ssma_plano_acao_panel_filter`
9. `ap_painel_filter_origem` vs `ap_painel_filter_origem`
Let me do them in parallel.
Tool Calls (5)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "_action_plan_responsible_icons"}
Result
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "_action_plan_view_offcanvas"}
Result
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "plano_acao_tabs"}
Result
File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js
Match lines: 1
3101| var link = ev.target && ev.target.closest ? ev.target.closest('#plano_acao_tabs .app-tab-link') : null;
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/index.html.twig
Match lines: 1
52| 'tabs_id': 'plano_acao_tabs',
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "ssmaApActionView"}
Result
File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js
Match lines: 5
3024| if (typeof window.openOffcanvasssmaApActionView === 'function') {
3025| window.openOffcanvasssmaApActionView();
3028| var canvas = document.getElementById('ssmaApActionView-offcanvas-wrapper')
3029| || document.getElementById('ssmaApActionViewOffcanvas');
3034| window.jQuery('#ssmaApActionView').modal('show');
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "js-ssma-ap-responsible-tooltip"}
Result
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig Match lines: 1 15| <div class="member-avatar-circle position-relative overflow-hidden js-ssma-ap-responsible-tooltip"
Request #18
deepseek-v4-flash
P:80.85K C:480 CR:80.51K CW:0
3671ms
Reasoning
So:
- `_action_plan_responsible_icons` partial is not used anywhere (only its own file). Dead code → new finding.
- `_action_plan_view_offcanvas` not included anywhere (already confirmed #8).
- `plano_acao_tabs` id used in both index.html.twig and JS in same PR. But I should check old id references `plano_tabs` in other files (e.g., action_plan.js or tabs component JS) that may break.
- `ssmaApActionView` only in JS file, no HTML. Confirmed #2.
- `js-ssma-ap-responsible-tooltip` class only in that dead partial.
Let me search more: `plano_tabs` old id usage in other templates/JS. Also search `tab_plano_painel`, `ssmaPlanoAcaoActiveTab`, `query_tab_param` tab component behavior, and `member_by_id`.
Also, check what `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` and other action plan JS use for tab switching (e.g., older code listening on `#plano_tabs`). If renamed to `plano_acao_tabs` and other code (in the action plan tab JS) still binds `#plano_tabs`, breaking tab switching after the change.
Let me search.
Tool Calls (5)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "plano_tabs"}
Result
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "ssmaPlanoAcaoActiveTab"}
Result
File: .opencodereview/rules/ssma/action-plan-panel.md
Match lines: 1
44|- Renderiza `ssma/action_plan/index.html.twig` com `ssmaPlanoAcaoActiveTab = tab_plano_painel`.
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/index.html.twig
Match lines: 1
23|{% set defaultPlanoTab = ssmaPlanoAcaoActiveTab|default('tab_plano_acoes') %}
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "member_by_id"}
Result
File: config/routes_goals.yaml
Match lines: 1
96|app_goal_member_by_id:
File: docs/permitions/members-teams-permissoes-ajustes.md
Match lines: 1
168|### 6) Teste de endpoint auxiliar (`api_get_member_by_id`)
File: src/Controller/CompanyController.php
Match lines: 1
4050| * @Route("/api/members/{id}", name="api_get_member_by_id", methods={"GET"})
File: templates/manager/ssma/abordagem_report.html.twig
Match lines: 5
755|{% set member_by_id = {} %}
757| {% set member_by_id = member_by_id|merge({ ('member_' ~ member.id): member }) %}
885| {% if member_by_id[_ck] is defined %}
886| {% set colaboradores = colaboradores|merge([member_by_id[_ck]]) %}
1489| {% if member_by_id[_ark] is defined %}{% set _act_resp = member_by_id[_ark] %}{% endif %}
File: templates/manager/ssma/inspection_report.html.twig
Match lines: 6
649|{% set member_by_id = {} %}
651| {% set member_by_id = member_by_id|merge({ ('member_' ~ member.id): member }) %}
681| {% if member_by_id[_k] is defined %}
682| {% set involved_members = involved_members|merge([member_by_id[_k]]) %}
900| {% if member_by_id[_drk] is defined %}{% set _dev_resp = member_by_id[_drk] %}{% endif %}
1101| {% if member_by_id[_ark] is defined %}{% set _act_resp = member_by_id[_ark] %}{% endif %}
File: templates/manager/ssma/report.html.twig
Match lines: 12
929|{% set member_by_id = {} %}
931| {% set member_by_id = member_by_id|merge({ ('member_' ~ member.id): member }) %}
952|{% set manager_member = manager_member_key and member_by_id[manager_member_key] is defined ? member_by_id[manager_member_key] : null %}
956|{% set responsible_member = responsible_member_key and member_by_id[responsible_member_key] is defined ? member_by_id[responsible_member_key] : null %}
967| {% if member_by_id[person_key] is defined %}
968| {% set people_members = people_members|merge([member_by_id[person_key]]) %}
975| {% if member_by_id[witness_key] is defined %}
976| {% set witness_members = witness_members|merge([member_by_id[witness_key]]) %}
1367| {% set _mem = _memKey and member_by_id[_memKey] is defined ? member_by_id[_memKey] : null %}
1401| {% if member_by_id[_pk] is defined %}{% set _person_member = member_by_id[_pk] %}{% endif %}
2078| {% if member_by_id[_resp_key] is defined %}
2079| {% set _resp_members = _resp_members|merge([member_by_id[_resp_key]]) %}
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig
Match lines: 2
5|{% set executor_member = executor_key and member_by_id[executor_key] is defined ? member_by_id[executor_key] : null %}
6|{% set validator_member = validator_key and member_by_id[validator_key] is defined ? member_by_id[validator_key] : null %}
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_table.html.twig
Match lines: 6
1|{% set member_by_id = {} %}
3| {% set member_by_id = member_by_id|merge({ ('member_' ~ member.id): member }) %}
96| {% if responsible_id and member_by_id[responsible_key] is defined %}
97| {% set child_members = child_members|merge([member_by_id[responsible_key]]) %}
205| {% if responsible_id and member_by_id[responsible_key] is defined %}
206| {% set responsible_members = responsible_members|merge([member_by_id[responsible_key]]) %}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig
Match lines: 16
490|{% set member_by_id = {} %}
492| {% set member_by_id = member_by_id|merge({ ('member_' ~ member.id): member }) %}
512|{% set manager_member = manager_member_key and member_by_id[manager_member_key] is defined ? member_by_id[manager_member_key] : null %}
520| {% if member_by_id[person_key] is defined %}
521| {% set people_members = people_members|merge([member_by_id[person_key]]) %}
527|{% set created_by_member = created_by_member_key and member_by_id[created_by_member_key] is defined ? member_by_id[created_by_member_key] : null %}
532| {% if member_by_id[witness_key] is defined %}
533| {% set witness_members = witness_members|merge([member_by_id[witness_key]]) %}
537|{% set evidence_uploader_member = responsible_member_key and member_by_id[responsible_member_key] is defined
538| ? member_by_id[responsible_member_key]
905| {% set area_resp_member = area_resp_key and member_by_id[area_resp_key] is defined ? member_by_id[area_resp_key] : null %}
962| member_by_id: member_by_id,
1005| {% set _mem = _memKey and member_by_id[_memKey] is defined ? member_by_id[_memKey] : null %}
1158| {% if member_by_id[responsible_key] is defined %}
1159| {% set responsible_members = responsible_members|merge([member_by_id[responsible_key]]) %}
1165| member_by_id: member_by_id
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_involved_people_display.html.twig
Match lines: 3
7| - member_by_id: mapa member_* (para exibir o próprio usuário quando protegido)
123| {% if (pid + 0) == (logged_member_id + 0) and member_by_id[self_key] is defined %}
124| {% set self_member = member_by_id[self_key] %}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/tabs/_tab_occurrences.html.twig
Match lines: 7
64|{% set member_by_id = {} %}
66| {% set member_by_id = member_by_id|merge({ ('member_' ~ member.id): member }) %}
443| {% set managerMember = managerMemberKey and member_by_id[managerMemberKey] is defined ? [member_by_id[managerMemberKey]] : [] %}
447| {% if personId and member_by_id[personKey] is defined %}
448| {% set peopleMembers = peopleMembers|merge([member_by_id[personKey]]) %}
584| member_by_id: member_by_id,
677| {% set managerMemberTbl = managerMemberKeyTbl and member_by_id[managerMemberKeyTbl] is defined ? [member_by_id[managerMemberKeyTbl]] : [] %}
File: templates/ssma/partials/_action_taken_card.html.twig
Match lines: 2
111| {% if member_by_id is defined and member_by_id[_vk] is defined %}
112| {% set validator_member = member_by_id[_vk] %}
File: templates/ssma/prevention/approach/index.html.twig
Match lines: 6
40|{# Build member_by_id for action cards #}
41|{% set member_by_id = {} %}
43| {% set member_by_id = member_by_id|merge({ ('member_' ~ member.id): member }) %}
70| {% if member_by_id[_col_key] is defined %}
71| {% set participantes_stack_members = participantes_stack_members|merge([member_by_id[_col_key]]) %}
524| {% set rm = member_by_id['member_' ~ rid]|default(null) %}
File: templates/ssma/prevention/inspection/index.html.twig
Match lines: 5
133|{% set member_by_id = {} %}
135| {% set member_by_id = member_by_id|merge({ ('member_' ~ member.id): member }) %}
140| {% set responsible_member = member_by_id['member_' ~ inspection.safety_responsible_id]|default(null) %}
145| {% set pm = member_by_id['member_' ~ pid]|default(null) %}
379| {% set rm = member_by_id['member_' ~ rid]|default(null) %}
File: templates/ssma/refusal/tabs/_tab_list.html.twig
Match lines: 3
11|{% set member_by_id = {} %}
13| {% set member_by_id = member_by_id|merge({ ('member_' ~ member.id): member }) %}
201| {% set leaderMembers = leaderKey and member_by_id[leaderKey] is defined ? [member_by_id[leaderKey]] : [] %}
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "tab_plano_painel"}
Result
File: .opencodereview/rules/ssma/action-plan-panel.md
Match lines: 6
22|1. **`/plano-acao?tab=tab_plano_painel` abria sem KPIs** — só `planoAcaoPainel` hidratava `action_plan_panel_data`; a index não. O JS (`updateKpiRow`) só atualiza cards já renderizados no SSR.
44|- Renderiza `ssma/action_plan/index.html.twig` com `ssmaPlanoAcaoActiveTab = tab_plano_painel`.
45|- `planoAcaoIndex` (`GET /manager/ssma/plano-acao`) e `planoAcaoPainel` hidratam `action_plan_panel_data`. Sem isso a URL `?tab=tab_plano_painel` renderiza a aba Painel **sem** os 4 KPIs (o JS só atualiza cards já existentes).
46|- Query param `tab` na index define a aba ativa (`tab_plano_acoes` | `tab_plano_painel` | config | permissão).
143|4. **Hidratação dupla na index.** `planoAcaoIndex` chama `buildActionPlanPanelViewData` mesmo quando a aba ativa é Ações — custo aceitável para garantir `?tab=tab_plano_painel` sem rota dedicada.
151|3. **`planoAcaoIndex` sem `action_plan_panel_data`** — regressão que deixa a linha de KPIs vazia em `?tab=tab_plano_painel`.
File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js
Match lines: 4
3091| var painelPanel = document.getElementById('tab_plano_painel_content');
3106| if (target.indexOf('tab_plano_painel_content') !== -1) {
3113| if (tabId === 'tab_plano_painel') {
3148| var _painelInitPanel = document.getElementById('tab_plano_painel_content');
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/index.html.twig
Match lines: 2
27| {'id': 'tab_plano_painel', 'label': 'Painel', 'target_div': 'tab_plano_painel_content'}
65| <div id="tab_plano_painel_content" class="tab-panel" style="display:none;">
file_find
Show Details
Arguments
{"query_name": "_tab_action_plan"}
Result
templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_action_plan.html.twig templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_action_plan_config.html.twig templates/ssma/cause_tree/tree_view/tabs/_tab_action_plan.html.twig
Request #19
deepseek-v4-flash
P:84.17K C:351 CR:81.28K CW:0
3439ms
Reasoning
Interesting. The search results show:
- `_action_plan_responsible_icons` partial is dead code (no usage).
- There's a `templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_table.html.twig` which also builds member_by_id. This table partial maybe used by _tab_action_plan.
Let me read `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` to see the context of the actions tab and understand whether the responsible icons partial should be used there. Also read the .opencodereview rules file — it is background context. But since .opencodereview is not part of the review group, comments must target files in the review group.
Wait the review group excludes `.opencodereview/rules/ssma/action-plan-panel.md` even though it's listed in the commit. So we focus on the 8 files.
Let me check the tabs `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` for references to new partials, to confirm where the icons partial would be used (dead). Let me read that template.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_action_plan.html.twig"}
Result
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_action_plan.html.twig (Total lines: 1909)
IS_TRUNCATED: true
LINE_RANGE: 1-500
1|{% set action_plan_actions = action_plan_data.actions|default([]) %}
2|{% set kpis = action_plan_data.kpis|default({}) %}
3|{% set resolved_actions = kpis.resolved_actions|default(0) %}
4|{% set recommendation_text = kpis.recommendation|default('Sem recomendação no momento.') %}
5|{% set action_plan_charts = action_plan_data.charts|default({}) %}
6|{% set dashboard_charts = dashboard_data.charts|default({}) %}
7|{% set actions_on_schedule = dashboard_charts.actions_on_schedule|default(action_plan_charts.actions_on_schedule|default([])) %}
8|{% set action_plan_empty_chart_state %}
9| {% include 'components/_empty_card_state.html.twig' with {
10| icon: 'fa-chart-column',
11| title: 'Nenhum dado disponível',
12| subtitle: 'O gráfico será exibido quando houver informações suficientes.'
13| } %}
14|{% endset %}
15|
16|<style>
17|.ssma-action-plan-tab {
18| overflow-x: hidden;
19| max-width: 100%;
20|}
21|
22|.ssma-action-plan-tab > .row:first-child .mhs-card,
23|.ssma-action-plan-tab > .row:first-child .app-card-surface {
24| height: 100%;
25|}
26|
27|.ssma-action-plan-tab .mhs-card-body span {
28| display: block;
29| color: #5C5D5D;
30| line-height: 1.5;
31| font-size: 14px;
32|}
33|
34|.ssma-action-plan-tab .js-ssma-action-plan-recommendation-text {
35| max-width: 100%;
36|}
37|
38|.ssma-action-plan-recommendation-card {
39| min-height: 84px;
40| background: color-mix(in srgb, var(--company-theme1-800, #0F3D4A) 4%, #fff);
41| box-shadow: none;
42|}
43|
44|.ssma-action-plan-recommendation-label {
45| font-size: 12px;
46| font-weight: 700;
47| letter-spacing: 0.04em;
48| text-transform: uppercase;
49| color: var(--company-theme1-800, #0F3D4A);
50|}
51|
52|.ssma-action-plan-recommendation-icon {
53| width: 46px;
54| height: 46px;
55| border-radius: 10px;
56| background: color-mix(in srgb, var(--company-theme1-800, #0F3D4A) 12%, #fff);
57| color: var(--company-theme1-800, #0F3D4A);
58| display: inline-flex;
59| align-items: center;
60| justify-content: center;
61| flex: 0 0 auto;
62|}
63|
64|.ssma-action-plan-recommendation-icon i {
65| font-size: 20px;
66|}
67|
68|.ssma-action-plan-recommendation-text {
69| color: var(--company-theme1-800, #0F3D4A);
70| font-size: 14px;
71| line-height: 1.45;
72| display: block;
73| white-space: normal;
74| overflow: visible;
75| overflow-wrap: anywhere;
76| word-break: break-word;
77|}
78|
79|.ssma-action-plan-chart-title {
80| font-size: 16px;
81| font-weight: 700;
82| color: #5C5D5D;
83|}
84|
85|.ssma-conic-gauge-wrapper {
86| width: min(300px, 90%);
87| aspect-ratio: 1 / 1;
88|}
89|.ssma-conic-gauge-ring {
90| width: 100%;
91| height: 100%;
92|}
93|.ssma-conic-gauge-hole {
94| position: absolute;
95| top: 50%;
96| left: 50%;
97| transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
98| width: 68%;
99| height: 68%;
100| background: #fff;
101|}
102|.ssma-gauge-center-value {
103| font-size: 40px;
104| font-weight: 700;
105| color: #5C5D5D;
106| font-family: Inter, sans-serif;
107| line-height: 1;
108|}
109|
110|#ssma-action-plan-main-row {
111| align-items: flex-start;
112|}
113|
114|#ssma-action-plan-main-row > [class*="col-"] {
115| min-width: 0;
116| max-width: 100%;
117|}
118|
119|#ssma-action-plan-main-row > .col-xl-4 {
120| align-self: flex-start;
121|}
122|
123|#ssma-action-plan-main-row > .col-xl-4 .flex-fill {
124| flex: 0 0 auto;
125| width: 100%;
126| height: auto;
127|}
128|
129|#ssma-action-plan-main-row .app-card-surface {
130| height: auto;
131|}
132|
133|#ssma-action-plan-project-gauge,
134|#ssma-action-plan-resolution-gauge {
135| height: 360px;
136| min-height: 360px;
137| max-height: 360px;
138|}
139|</style>
140|
141|<div class="modern-header-actions has-mobile-fabs" id="ssma_action_plan_controls">
142| <div class="d-none d-lg-flex align-items-center" style="gap: 10px;">
143| {% if ssmaCanManageOccurrences|default(false) %}
144| <button type="button" class="mhs-btn-primary d-flex align-items-center js-create-action-btn">
145| <i class="fas fa-plus mr-2"></i>
146| <span>Criar Ação</span>
147| </button>
148| {% endif %}
149| <button type="button"
150| class="mhs-btn-secondary d-flex align-items-center ssma-action-plan-executive-report-btn"
151| data-report-url="{{ path('ssma_plano_acao_index', {executive_report: 1}) }}"
152| title="Relatório executivo de Plano de Ação">
153| <span class="spinner-border spinner-border-sm d-none mr-2 ssma-action-plan-executive-report-spinner" role="status" aria-hidden="true"></span>
154| <i class="fas fa-file-alt mr-2 ssma-action-plan-executive-report-icon"></i>
155| <span class="ssma-action-plan-executive-report-label">Relatório executivo</span>
156| </button>
157| {% include 'ssma/partials/_export_table_button.html.twig' with {
158| table_id: 'ssmaActionPlanTable',
159| report_title: 'Lista de Plano de Ação',
160| export_title: 'Plano de Ação — Módulo de Segurança',
161| column_titles: ['Plano de ação', 'Tipo', 'Evento de origem', 'Prazo', 'Prazo Sort', 'Ações Tomadas', 'Responsável', 'Ações', 'Validação']
162| } %}
163| </div>
164|</div>
165|
166|{% set _actionPlanFabButtons = [] %}
167|{% if ssmaCanManageOccurrences|default(false) %}
168| {% set _actionPlanFabButtons = _actionPlanFabButtons|merge([{
169| 'id': 'fab-create-action-plan',
170| 'icon': 'fas fa-plus',
171| 'style': 'primary',
172| 'class': 'js-create-action-btn',
173| 'tooltip': 'Criar Ação'
174| }]) %}
175|{% endif %}
176|{% set _actionPlanFabButtons = _actionPlanFabButtons|merge([{
177| 'id': 'fab-ssma-action-plan-executive-report',
178| 'icon': 'fas fa-file-alt',
179| 'style': 'secondary',
180| 'class': 'ssma-action-plan-executive-report-btn',
181| 'tooltip': 'Relatório executivo',
182| 'attributes': {
183| 'data-report-url': path('ssma_plano_acao_index', {executive_report: 1})
184| }
185|}]) %}
186|{% include 'components/ui/_mobile_fabs.html.twig' with { buttons: _actionPlanFabButtons } %}
187|
188|<div class="members-content p-3 ssma-action-plan-tab">
189|
190| {% if action_plan_actions|length == 0 %}
191| {% include 'utils/empty_state.html.twig' with {
192| 'title': 'Plano de ação',
193| 'description': 'Estrutura inicial preparada para concentrar ações, responsáveis, prazos e acompanhamento.',
194| 'minHeight': '420px',
195| 'imageMaxWidth': 240
196| } %}
197| {% else %}
198| {% include 'components/charts/_highcharts_loader.html.twig' %}
199| <div class="row">
200| <div class="col-12 col-md-6 col-xl-3 mb-3 js-ssma-action-plan-kpi-card" data-kpi-key="total_actions">
201| {% include 'components/ui/_card.html.twig' with {
202| title: 'Total de ações',
203| value: kpis.total_actions|default(action_plan_actions|length)
204| } %}
205| </div>
206| <div class="col-12 col-md-6 col-xl-3 mb-3 js-ssma-action-plan-kpi-card" data-kpi-key="open_actions">
207| {% include 'components/ui/_card.html.twig' with {
208| title: 'Ações abertas',
209| value: kpis.open_actions|default(0)
210| } %}
211| </div>
212| <div class="col-12 col-md-6 col-xl-3 mb-3 js-ssma-action-plan-kpi-card" data-kpi-key="resolved_actions">
213| {% include 'components/ui/_card.html.twig' with {
214| title: 'Ações resolvidas',
215| value: resolved_actions
216| } %}
217| </div>
218| <div class="col-12 col-md-6 col-xl-3 mb-3 js-ssma-action-plan-kpi-card" data-kpi-key="without_project">
219| {% include 'components/ui/_card.html.twig' with {
220| title: 'Sem projetos',
221| value: kpis.without_project|default(0)
222| } %}
223| </div>
224| </div>
225|
226| <div class="row">
227| <div class="col-12 mb-3">
228| <div class="app-card-surface pt-3 px-3 pb-2 ssma-action-plan-recommendation-card">
229| <div class="d-flex align-items-start" style="gap: 12px;">
230| <span class="ssma-action-plan-recommendation-icon">
231| <i class="fas fa-lightbulb"></i>
232| </span>
233| <div style="min-width: 0;">
234| <div class="ssma-action-plan-recommendation-label mb-1">Recomendação</div>
235| <div class="ssma-action-plan-recommendation-text js-ssma-action-plan-recommendation-text" data-toggle="tooltip">
236| {{ recommendation_text }}
237| </div>
238| </div>
239| </div>
240| </div>
241| </div>
242| </div>
243|
244| <div class="row" id="ssma-action-plan-main-row">
245| {% include 'ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_table.html.twig' with {
246| action_plan_data: action_plan_data,
247| allMembers: allMembers,
248| ssmaCanManageOccurrences: ssmaCanManageOccurrences|default(false)
249| } %}
250| <div class="col-12 col-xl-4 d-flex flex-column">
251| <div class="flex-fill mb-3">
252| <div class="app-card-surface h-100" id="ssma-action-plan-project-gauge-card">
253| <div class="d-flex align-items-center justify-content-between px-3 py-2 border-bottom">
254| <div class="ssma-action-plan-chart-title">Taxa de planos de ação com projetos</div>
255| </div>
256| <div class="p-3">
257| <div id="ssma-action-plan-project-gauge" style="height: 360px; min-height: 360px;">{{ action_plan_empty_chart_state }}</div>
258| </div>
259| </div>
260| </div>
261| <div class="flex-fill mb-3">
262| <div class="app-card-surface h-100">
263| <div class="d-flex align-items-center justify-content-between px-3 py-2 border-bottom">
264| <div class="ssma-action-plan-chart-title">Taxa de aceitação das ações</div>
265| </div>
266| <div class="p-3">
267| <div id="ssma-action-plan-resolution-gauge" style="height: 360px; min-height: 360px;">{{ action_plan_empty_chart_state }}</div>
268| </div>
269| </div>
270| </div>
271| </div>
272| </div>
273|
274| <div class="row">
275| <div class="col-12 col-lg-6 mb-3">
276| {% include 'ssma/partials/_actions_bar_chart.html.twig' with {
277| chart_id: 'ssma-action-plan-type-bar',
278| chart_title: 'Distribuição de ações por tipo',
279| chart_series: action_plan_data.bar_charts.types|default([]),
280| default_color: 'company',
281| auto_init: false
282| } %}
283| </div>
284| <div class="col-12 col-lg-6 mb-3">
285| {% include 'ssma/partials/_actions_bar_chart.html.twig' with {
286| chart_id: 'ssma-action-plan-deadline-bar',
287| chart_title: 'Distribuição de ações por prazo',
288| chart_series: actions_on_schedule,
289| default_color: '#186073',
290| auto_init: false
291| } %}
292| </div>
293| </div>
294| {% include 'ssma/partials/_modal_action_rejected.html.twig' with {
295| ssmaCanManageOccurrences: ssmaCanManageOccurrences|default(false)
296| } %}
297|
298| {# Modal: Vincular ação a um plano de ação existente #}
299| <div class="modal fade" id="ssmaLinkProjectModal" tabindex="-1" role="dialog" aria-labelledby="ssmaLinkProjectModalLabel" aria-hidden="true">
300| <div class="modal-dialog modal-dialog-centered" role="document">
301| <div class="modal-content">
302| <div class="modal-header">
303| <h5 class="modal-title" id="ssmaLinkProjectModalLabel">
304| <i class="fas fa-link mr-2"></i>Vincular a um plano de ação
305| </h5>
306| <button type="button" class="close" data-dismiss="modal" aria-label="Fechar">
307| <span aria-hidden="true">×</span>
308| </button>
309| </div>
310| <div class="modal-body">
311| <div id="ssmaLinkProjectLoadingState" class="text-center py-3" style="display:none;">
312| <i class="fas fa-spinner fa-spin mr-1"></i> Carregando planos...
313| </div>
314| <div id="ssmaLinkProjectContent">
315| <div class="form-group mb-0">
316| <label for="ssmaLinkProjectSelect">Plano de ação <span class="text-danger">*</span></label>
317| <select class="form-control" id="ssmaLinkProjectSelect">
318| <option value="" disabled selected>Selecione um plano de ação</option>
319| </select>
320| <small class="text-muted mt-1 d-block">A ação será vinculada ao plano selecionado.</small>
321| </div>
322| </div>
323| </div>
324| <div class="modal-footer">
325| <button type="button" class="btn btn-default" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button>
326| <button type="button" class="btn btn-primary" id="ssmaLinkProjectConfirmBtn">
327| <i class="fas fa-link mr-1"></i>Vincular
328| </button>
329| </div>
330| </div>
331| </div>
332| </div>
333|
334| <script>
335| var ssmaActionPlanChartState = window.ssmaActionPlanChartState || {
336| projectGauge: null,
337| resolutionGauge: null,
338| typeBar: null,
339| deadlineBar: null,
340| initialized: false
341| };
342| var ssmaActionPlanGauges = {{ action_plan_data.gauges|default({})|json_encode|raw }};
343| var ssmaActionPlanTypeSeries = {{ action_plan_data.bar_charts.types|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
344| var ssmaActionPlanCharts = {{ action_plan_charts|merge({'actions_on_schedule': actions_on_schedule})|json_encode|raw }};
345| var ssmaActionPlanChartEmptyStateHtml = {{ include('components/_empty_card_state.html.twig', {
346| icon: 'fa-chart-column',
347| title: 'Nenhum dado disponível',
348| subtitle: 'O gráfico será exibido quando houver informações suficientes.'
349| })|json_encode|raw }};
350| var ssmaActionPlanState = window.ssmaActionPlanState || {
351| actions: {{ action_plan_actions|json_encode|raw }},
352| kpis: {{ action_plan_data.kpis|default({})|json_encode|raw }},
353| gauges: {{ action_plan_data.gauges|default({})|json_encode|raw }},
354| charts: {{ action_plan_charts|merge({'actions_on_schedule': actions_on_schedule})|json_encode|raw }},
355| barCharts: {
356| types: {{ action_plan_data.bar_charts.types|default([])|json_encode|raw }}
357| }
358| };
359| var ssmaActionPlanDeleteUrl = {{ path('admin_ssma_action_plan_delete')|json_encode|raw }};
360| var ssmaActionPlanReopenUrlTemplate = {{ path('admin_ssma_action_reopen', {id: '__ID__'})|json_encode|raw }};
361| var ssmaActionPlanProjectsUrl = {{ path('ssma_action_plan_projects')|json_encode|raw }};
362| var ssmaActionLinkProjectUrlTemplate = {{ path('ssma_action_link_project', {id: '__ID__'})|json_encode|raw }};
363| var ssmaOccurrenceViewUrlTemplate = {{ path('admin_ssma_occurrence_view', {id: '__ID__'})|json_encode|raw }};
364| var ssmaIsViewer = {{ ssmaIsViewer|default(false) ? 'true' : 'false' }};
365| var ssmaCanAccessSupervisorSurface = {{ ssmaCanAccessSupervisorSurface|default(false) ? 'true' : 'false' }};
366| var ssmaCanManageOccurrences = {{ ssmaCanManageOccurrences|default(false) ? 'true' : 'false' }};
367|
368| window.ssmaActionPlanChartState = ssmaActionPlanChartState;
369| window.ssmaActionPlanState = ssmaActionPlanState;
370|
371| function renderSsmaActionPlanChartEmptyState(containerId) {
372| $('#' + containerId).html(ssmaActionPlanChartEmptyStateHtml);
373|
374| return {
375| reflow: $.noop,
376| destroy: function () {
377| $('#' + containerId).html(ssmaActionPlanChartEmptyStateHtml);
378| }
379| };
380| }
381|
382| function waitForSsmaActionPlanHighcharts(callback, retries) {
383| var loaderState = window.__dynamicChartHighchartsLoaderState || {};
384|
385| if (window.Highcharts && loaderState.ready) {
386| callback();
387| return;
388| }
389|
390| var remaining = (typeof retries === 'number') ? retries : 60;
391| if (remaining <= 0) {
392| return;
393| }
394|
395| setTimeout(function () {
396| waitForSsmaActionPlanHighcharts(callback, remaining - 1);
397| }, 120);
398| }
399|
400| function updateSsmaActionPlanGaugeCenterLabel(chart, value) {
401| var normalizedValue = Math.max(0, Math.min(100, Number(value || 0)));
402| var labelText = normalizedValue + '%';
403| var gaugeSeries = chart.series && chart.series[0] ? chart.series[0] : null;
404| var seriesCenter = gaugeSeries && gaugeSeries.center ? gaugeSeries.center : null;
405|
406| if (!seriesCenter) {
407| return;
408| }
409|
410| if (!chart.customCenterLabel) {
411| chart.customCenterLabel = chart.renderer
412| .text(labelText, 0, 0)
413| .attr({
414| zIndex: 5
415| })
416| .css({
417| color: '#5C5D5D',
418| fontFamily: 'Inter, sans-serif',
419| fontSize: '40px',
420| fontWeight: '700',
421| lineHeight: '1',
422| textOutline: 'none'
423| })
424| .add();
425| } else {
426| chart.customCenterLabel.attr({ text: labelText });
427| }
428|
429| var bbox = chart.customCenterLabel.getBBox();
430| var centerX = chart.plotLeft + seriesCenter[0];
431| var centerY = chart.plotTop + seriesCenter[1];
432|
433| chart.customCenterLabel.attr({
434| x: centerX - (bbox.width / 2),
435| y: centerY + (bbox.height / 4)
436| });
437| }
438|
439| function getSsmaActionPlanCssColor(varName, fallback) {
440| var value = getComputedStyle(document.documentElement).getPropertyValue(varName);
441| value = value ? value.trim() : '';
442| return value || fallback;
443| }
444|
445| function getSsmaActionPlanBrandColors() {
446| return {
447| dark: getSsmaActionPlanCssColor('--company-theme1-800', '#0F3D4A'),
448| base: getSsmaActionPlanCssColor('--company-theme1', '#1E8FA0'),
449| light: getSsmaActionPlanCssColor('--company-theme1-600', '#155465')
450| };
451| }
452|
453| function buildSsmaActionPlanGradient(config) {
454| return {
455| linearGradient: {
456| x1: config.x1,
457| y1: config.y1,
458| x2: config.x2,
459| y2: config.y2
460| },
461| stops: config.stops || []
462| };
463| }
464|
465| function ssmaActionPlanHexToRgb(hex) {
466| var sanitized = (hex || '').replace('#', '');
467|
468| if (sanitized.length === 3) {
469| sanitized = sanitized.split('').map(function (char) {
470| return char + char;
471| }).join('');
472| }
473|
474| return {
475| r: parseInt(sanitized.substring(0, 2), 16),
476| g: parseInt(sanitized.substring(2, 4), 16),
477| b: parseInt(sanitized.substring(4, 6), 16)
478| };
479| }
480|
481| function ssmaActionPlanRgbToHex(rgb) {
482| function toHex(value) {
483| var normalized = Math.max(0, Math.min(255, Math.round(value)));
484| return normalized.toString(16).padStart(2, '0');
485| }
486|
487| return '#' + toHex(rgb.r) + toHex(rgb.g) + toHex(rgb.b);
488| }
489|
490| function getSsmaActionPlanColorFromStops(stops, position) {
491| var normalizedPosition = Math.max(0, Math.min(1, position));
492| var currentStop = stops[0];
493| var nextStop = stops[stops.length - 1];
494|
495| $.each(stops, function (index, stop) {
496| if (normalizedPosition >= stop[0]) {
497| currentStop = stop;
498| }
499|
500| if (normalizedPosition <= stop[0]) {
Note: Results truncated to 500 lines. Please narrow your line range.
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "openOffcanvas", "file_patterns": ["public/js/ssma/*.js"]}
Result
File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js
Match lines: 2
3024| if (typeof window.openOffcanvasssmaApActionView === 'function') {
3025| window.openOffcanvasssmaApActionView();
File: public/js/ssma/effectiveness.js
Match lines: 2
792| if (typeof window.openOffcanvasEffectivenessActionDetail === 'function') {
793| window.openOffcanvasEffectivenessActionDetail();
File: public/js/ssma/leadership_evaluation.js
Match lines: 4
295| if (typeof window.openOffcanvasleadershipLeaderDetail === 'function') {
296| window.openOffcanvasleadershipLeaderDetail();
300| if (typeof window.openOffcanvasLeadershipLeaderDetail === 'function') {
301| window.openOffcanvasLeadershipLeaderDetail();
Request #20
deepseek-v4-flash
P:90.89K C:5.26K CR:84.48K CW:0
40270ms
Reasoning
The tab action plan template has inline script (as existing code). Not part of this PR.
Now, I want to verify some functional issues in the new files more concretely:
**Finding A (new): Dead partial `_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig`** — never included anywhere. This mirrors confirmed #8 (offcanvas never included), but is for a distinct file. It's a new file in review group that isn't referenced. I can report it as maintainability/dead code.
Actually wait — maybe it's intended to be included from `_action_plan_table.html.twig` or from action plan tab (existing file not in diff). Since search shows no usage anywhere in repo, it is dead code.
**Finding B (new):** `updateRecommendationBlock`? Already fine.
**Finding C:** The `renderSemanticAdrianaRow` empty-state transition bug described above. Let me double check the code path again by reading the partial and the JS once more precisely.
Partial: in the Adriana card, there are two columns: insights and questions.
Structure of partial body (adriana card):
```
<div class="ssma-adriana-split">
<div class="ssma-adriana-insights-col">
{% if _no_data and _insights|length == 0 %}
... empty block ... (NO data-ap-adriana-insights)
{% else %}
<ol ... data-ap-adriana-insights> ... </ol>
{% endif %}
</div>
<div class="ssma-adriana-questions-col">
<div class="ssma-adriana-questions-title">Perguntas sugeridas</div>
{% if _no_data and _questions|length == 0 %}
<p ...>As perguntas aparecerão aqui...</p>
{% else %}
<div class="...data-ap-adriana-questions"> ... </div>
{% endif %}
</div>
</div>
```
Note: `_no_data` = not _has_semantic and not _has_adriana. When there's data (filter change yields results), renderSemanticAdrianaRow sets contentEl.innerHTML with semantic content and insightsEl/questionsEl innerHTML if elements exist.
If the SSR state was empty (_no_data true), the markup lacks data-ap-adriana-insights & data-ap-adriana-questions containers. After the user applies a filter that returns data, the JS can only fill contentEl (semantic text). The insights & questions containers won't exist, so they never get populated; also the empty message "As perguntas aparecerão aqui após o registro de dados" persists. But wait — after contentEl updated with semantic summary, does the row still have `_no_data`-style rendering for insights/questions? The empty state for insights is independent and remains.
So yes it is a functional gap. But how likely? The pendencias view defaults: SSR panel data might already include semantic summary even if empty arrays. The empty branch appears only when both semantic & adriana empty. This is the typical initial state when there are no pendências. Once data arrives via filter fetch, user expects insights to appear. This is plausible, medium severity, maintainability/UI bug.
But hmm — is it worth reporting? It's a real logic issue: JS update path doesn't handle the SSR empty markup transition. Might be a genuine bug. Severity: medium. Category bug.
Wait, but there might be a similar pattern used in the Ocorrências panel already (this pattern presumably ported). The confirmed finding list already includes duplicate logic references to occurrences panel. This specific transition bug — let me check the occurrences panel's JS to see if it handles the empty container differently (i.e., whether there's an existing convention). Actually we can't confirm; but this might be a known, existing pattern. Hmm. But the review should be about this PR's new code.
Actually, let me re-examine: Maybe the insight/questions containers exist because the template always renders them even when empty, given the else branch. The else branch is used when `_no_data` is false OR when `_insights|length > 0` etc. For empty SSR state where _has_semantic false and _has_adriana false → `_no_data` true → empty branch. So containers missing.
I'll report as a medium bug with recommendation to always render the containers (and fill fallback content inside), so the JS can populate them on later updates.
**Finding D:** In `_tab_painel.html.twig`, the pendencias table "Visualizar" button only includes action data attributes partially. The action offcanvas expects title/code/etc., but the JS openActionViewOffcanvas uses `ssma-ap-action-view-*` IDs not present (confirmed #2). The pendencias table's own SSR includes `data-action-id`, etc. In the JS buildPendenciasTableRowHtml, they include many data-action attributes. But the offcanvas partial (never included) has its own `data-ap-detail` attributes; the JS `openActionViewOffcanvas` uses different IDs: 'ssma-ap-action-view-title', 'ssma-ap-action-view-id', 'ssma-ap-action-view-origin', etc. Those IDs don't exist in the offcanvas partial either (partial uses `data-ap-detail="title"` etc.). So even if offcanvas partial was included, the JS would not find elements by IDs. Another mismatch confirms #2/#8.
Wait, but maybe there is another "action view" offcanvas template in the repo that contains the `ssma-ap-action-view-*` ids. Since the offcanvas partial in this PR has data-ap-detail attributes, not IDs. If that partial were used, JS wouldn't populate. But this offcanvas isn't included anyway. Not repeating #2/#8.
**Finding E:** In the twig partial `_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig`, the details fields use `data-ap-detail="..."` placeholders. But no JS in this PR populates data-ap-detail elements. If the intent is for the JS to populate, mismatch. But since the partial is never rendered, the whole feature is broken (confirmed). We can mention the mismatch to strengthen #2? Probably don't repeat.
**Finding F:** index.html.twig now includes `_tab_painel` (with the panel) for EVERY user regardless of permissions? Actually the painel tab is available to everyone. But there is the `ssmaPlanoAcaoActiveTab` set only on specific controllers? The rules doc (opencodereview) says index must hydrate action_plan_panel_data or KPI row empty. That's an internal doc. Not part of review.
**Finding G:** In `_tab_painel.html.twig`, there's a `<script src="https://cdnjs...html2canvas..."></script>` duplicate with `ensureHtml2Canvas` (confirmed #9).
**Finding H:** In the CSS, use of `:has()` in index.html.twig (new inline style) is fine modern browsers. Might not need.
**Finding I:** Let's analyze `runPanelFilterRequest` — uses `fetch` with GET. Should there be error handling for HTTP 4xx? It just parses JSON and shows error. If server returns HTML (500), response.json() throws → catch shows generic error. Fine.
**Finding J:** Potential issue: `showPanelToast` when no window.showToast — silently does nothing. Acceptable.
**Finding K:** In `applyFilterResponse`, for 'pendencias', they call mergePanelData(resp.panel), but pendencias charts SSR axes etc.? Fine.
But there is something: after filter response, for the overview KPI the SSR? fine.
**Finding L:** `panelState.overviewPage` not reset to 1 when overviewPeriod preset applied? applyOverviewPeriodPreset sets panelState.overviewPage = 1. Good.
**Finding M:** There's the issue: when clicking page "prev" from page 1 — `panelState.overviewPage = currentPage - 1` (0) → but guarded by total===0? Only guard `if (total === 0) return;` at start; if currentPage===1 and user clicks prev (which is disabled anyway), skip.
**Finding N:** In `updateOverviewPagination`, the info text uses `to.toLocaleString('pt-BR')`. Note: data locale? fine.
**Finding O:** There is a mismatch in labels. Not important.
**Finding P:** The `buildPendenciasTableRowHtml` for `data-action-origin`: `row.origin_label || row.occurrence_title`. But table row object fields in Twig table define columns; not a specific issue.
**Finding Q:** XSS via escapeHtml on attributes is handled. But `buildPendenciasTableRowHtml` puts title attr etc. escaped. Good.
**Finding R:** In `updateOperationalSummary` row.percent used inside style width: `escapeHtml(row.percent)`. If percent = "12,5"? Actually backend returns numeric; width uses % with comma decimal value is not valid CSS: `width: 12,5%;` invalid. Escape doesn't convert commas. Backend presumably returns integer percent. Uncertain, skip.
**Finding S:** In CSS, `.ssma-ap-overview-table-footer .dataTables_length label` etc. fine.
**Finding T:** Let's examine **duplicate element IDs across pendencias and overview**? Both pendencias and overview content sections are separate with different IDs. OK.
**Finding U:** In `_tab_painel`, custom select `_custom_select.html.twig` uses `selected_value` prop. For origin filter it uses `panel_filters.origin`. These options list includes origin defaults that are hardcoded fallback only. Fine.
**Finding V:** The KPI SSR `_card.html.twig` component receives `content` key with `_kpi_trend.label`; CSS `.mhs-card-body span` maybe not styled; fine.
Let me now focus on cross-file issue: JS `onPainelTabVisible` relies on `panelData` SSR JSON containing charts etc. and triggers filter only if no labels. But if default view is visao_geral and SSR overview has data? panelData.overview exists? For index controller (not painel controller), doc says index must hydrate action_plan_panel_data else empty. opencode rule says both planoAcaoIndex and planoAcaoPainel hydrate data. OK.
Now there may be one more important cross-check: In `buildFilterParams` the pendencias view includes `params.set('period', getApPanelPeriodParam());` but then also `if (panelState.origin)`. But note 'visao_geral' adds origin too. Fine.
**Wait — I found a potential real bug candidate**: `buildFilterParams` does:
```js
if (panelState.unidade && panelState.unidade !== 'todas') {
params.set('unidade', panelState.unidade);
} else {
var viewKey = view || currentView;
if (viewKey === 'visao_geral' && document.getElementById('ap_overview_filter_unit')) {
params.set('unidade', panelState.unidade || 'todas');
} else if (viewKey === 'pendencias' && document.getElementById('ap_painel_filter_unidade')) {
params.set('unidade', panelState.unidade || 'todas');
}
}
```
Suppose user (network head) selects unit "matriz": panelState.unidade = 'matriz'; params set 'matriz'. Good.
Suppose user selects 'todas': branch else; element exists; set unidade='todas'. Good.
Suppose non-network-head user (no filter element): panelState.unidade = '' from sync (when element absent, unidade=''). `panelState.unidade && ...` false → else; getElementById null → param not set. Good.
But there's a catch: When switching views while having a selected unit on pendencias (e.g., unit=subsidiary 5), then switching to visao_geral and clicking pill triggers syncOverviewFilterState → reads overview filter unit element (ap_overview_filter_unit) which has its own state 'todas' (SSR default). So overview request doesn't include unit 5. Fine.
OK.
Now what about a subtle cross-view state pollution: `panelState.origin` from pendencias filter 'ap_painel_filter_origem', used in overview view request only after syncOverviewFilterState reads overview origin select. OK.
**Now examine the pendencias filter "Origem" SSR vs "axis" label etc.** fine.
Let me look at the JS's initial tab visibility trigger, race: DOMContentLoaded triggers onPainelTabVisible if panel visible. observePainelTab also triggers. Could double-init? initialized flag guards, since onPainelTabVisible sets initialized = true before binding, second call sees initialized true and calls switchView(currentView) again — harmless but triggers rendering charts twice? Actually second call: if initialized → switchView(currentView). switchView for pendencias destroys overview charts and renderPendenciasCharts(). Could happen twice on load (both the immediate call and the observer call via offsetParent not null). Double rendering is fine due to destroy-first.
Let's verify: observePainelTab: if visible, onPainelTabVisible(); And DOMContentLoaded then also calls onPainelTabVisible if `_painelInitPanel.offsetParent !== null`. So on load with painel visible, onPainelTabVisible runs twice (first from observePainelTab, second from DOMContentLoaded). Second invocation with initialized=true → switchView(currentView) → if view is pendencias: destroyOverviewCharts(); renderPendenciasCharts() which waits Highcharts and renders charts again. Charts get destroyed & re-rendered — harmless but duplicate work. For visao_geral default, second call also renders... could cause charts duplicated? renderOverviewCharts called twice; overviewChartsRendered flag resets; charts keys overwritten after destroy. OK.
But also if default view is pendencias and SSR data present, first invocation triggers `triggerPanelFilter`? It only triggers filter if no labels. Second call `switchView` won't trigger filter. Fine.
Overall, double init is minor.
**Now let me think about duplicated includes of CSS and JS.** _tab_painel.html.twig loads html2canvas + action_plan_panel.js at bottom. Since the entire index page includes all tab contents at once (each tab panel div present; panels hidden by style display none, but still included), the scripts in _tab_painel will load regardless of whether painel tab active. This matches confirmed #9 about html2canvas ~1MB always downloaded, even for users who never open the Painel tab (since _tab_painel.html.twig is always included in the index page DOM regardless of which tab is shown — the tab panel divs are all in DOM with display:none). Actually yes, because tab content is server-rendered all at once; CSS/JS tags inside `_tab_painel` will be fetched on every page load. This strengthens the finding #9. Not repeat.
**Now CSS/JS file sizes:** noted in #4.
Let me look at the JS for two more specific issues:
1. `ensureHtml2Canvas` loader id: They set script.id = 'ssma-ap-panel-html2canvas-loader' with src CDN. If existing loader found (e.g., from static include in _tab_painel with no id), existing check looks for id 'ssma-ap-panel-html2canvas-loader'. Static include script doesn't have that id, so `existing` not found → they'd add a second html2canvas script tag. However html2canvas already loaded (function), first branch returns resolve(true). So static include ensures library present; fine.
2. In `exportPanelChartsPrint`, `renderOverviewCharts()` may create distribution charts each export. `ensureDistributionChartsForExport` checks `resolutionEl` has `.highcharts-container`; if none, calls `window.refreshSsmaActionPlanCharts()` (defined in action_plan.js) that re-renders gauges. This only exists if action plan data present. If this code runs on the panel view of the index page where action plan JS of _tab_action_plan tab also exists on same page (yes both tab contents rendered), refreshSsmaActionPlanCharts function should exist globally. Fine.
3. In the print `iframe.onload` triggers `win.print()`. In some browsers printing on an iframe not attached? OK.
Now let's inspect the actual structure: Are chart containers present when print? For visao_geral distribution gauges exist in the visao_geral tab. If user is in pendencias and exports, getPendenciasPrintSections doesn't include distribution; good.
Potential bug: iframe `srcdoc` includes images with base64 data URLs, fine.
Now examine `buildPrintDocumentHtml` sets `<title>` includes viewLabel escaped; fine.
**Next, check `_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig` for references to variables that may not exist**:
- `{% set _ap = action_plan_data|default({}) %}` then `_ap.charts.actions_on_schedule`, `_ap.bar_charts.types`. `action_plan_data` is passed to the index page for the actions tab, so it exists in page context. In _tab_painel include, context inherits from index template which has action_plan_data? The doc rule states both controllers hydrate. OK.
- `_actions_bar_chart.html.twig` partial with chart ids `ssma-action-plan-type-bar` and `ssma-action-plan-deadline-bar`. These same chart IDs are ALSO rendered in `_tab_action_plan` tab (the actions tab) on the SAME page (both tab panels exist in DOM; only one visible at a time). Wait — this is a real concern! `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` (the existing "Plano de Ação" tab) renders `ssma-action-plan-type-bar`, `ssma-action-plan-deadline-bar`, `ssma-action-plan-project-gauge`, `ssma-action-plan-resolution-gauge` charts in its content. And the new `_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig` ALSO renders chart containers with the SAME ids (`ssma-action-plan-type-bar`, `ssma-action-plan-deadline-bar`, `ssma-action-plan-project-gauge`, `ssma-action-plan-resolution-gauge`). Duplicate element IDs on the same page!
Since the tab panels are all present in the DOM simultaneously (tab-panel divs with style display none/block), you will have duplicate IDs `ssma-action-plan-project-gauge`, `ssma-action-plan-resolution-gauge`, `ssma-action-plan-type-bar`, `ssma-action-plan-deadline-bar` — one in `tab_plano_acoes_content` (actions tab) and one in `tab_plano_painel_content` (painel → visao_geral). The actions tab's `_actions_bar_chart.html.twig` is included with `auto_init: false`, and JS in action_plan.js presumably initializes them. When the panel's visao_geral shows its own copies, `renderOverviewCharts` calls `initSsmaActionPlanCharts` which initializes charts on these ids. With duplicate IDs, `document.getElementById` returns the first matching element — the one in the hidden actions tab! So the visao_geral charts may render into the hidden actions tab's containers (the first in DOM), and the visible painel's containers remain empty.
Wait, but each tab content div is included separately:
- `tab_plano_acoes_content` (display block)
- `tab_plano_painel_content` (display none)
When Painel is active, the actions content is hidden but still in DOM. If Painel's visao_geral view calls renderOverviewCharts → initSsmaActionPlanCharts() which initializes charts with ids; any chart initialization using getElementById('ssma-action-plan-project-gauge') would grab the FIRST occurrence in DOM, which belongs to the (hidden) actions tab. So the gauge renders inside hidden actions tab, not the painel.
Actually wait: This depends on how `_actions_bar_chart.html.twig` and the action plan JS initialize these charts. Let me check how the JS references containers. In action_plan.js (existing) they likely use `document.getElementById`. If so, duplicates break.
Also, the JS panel file itself does renderOverviewCharts but the actual chart init for distribution is delegated to `window.initSsmaActionPlanCharts` (existing global). The panel's CSS explicitly targets `#ssma-action-plan-gauges-row .app-card-surface` and sets gauge height for `#ssma-action-plan-project-gauge` and `#ssma-action-plan-resolution-gauge` — the same ids. But since the actions tab also uses those ids, `#...project-gauge` CSS applies to both. And duplicate id = invalid HTML.
Given that both tab contents are always in the DOM (the index template renders all tab panels, toggled with inline `style="display:none"`), the duplicate ID issue is real. However, maybe the actions tab `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` is only included in `tab_plano_acoes_content`, and the painel in `tab_plano_painel_content`, both always present in DOM. Yes.
Hold on: does the Painel's visao_geral include the distribution charts & gauges again deliberately? It does — it re-uses `ssma/partials/_actions_bar_chart.html.twig` with same chart ids and gauges. This is a duplicate render across the tabs. It causes duplicate IDs on one page. That's a legitimate cross-file finding.
But is `tab_plano_painel_content` always in the DOM? Yes: `<div id="tab_plano_painel_content" class="tab-panel" style="display:none;">{% include ... %}</div>`. And `_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig` is included inside _tab_painel regardless of whether the user is on pendencias or visao_geral (only one view is shown via d-none but both `data-ap-panel-view` divs exist). Actually the visao_geral div inside _tab_painel is present even when default view pendencias, hidden with d-none. So the duplicate gauges & bar chart containers are in the DOM even in pendencias view.
So on the page that includes both tabs, the ids exist twice (or more). Charts drawn to these ids (e.g., via action_plan.js for the actions tab, and via action_plan_panel.js for the painel's visao_geral) will conflict: getElementById picks the first, so whichever chart init runs second will target the first container (the other tab), effectively double-initializing in the same container or leaving the wrong tab's container showing the wrong chart; likely breaking charts in at least one tab, or throwing Highcharts error when creating a chart in a container that already has one.
Let me confirm by reading `_actions_bar_chart.html.twig` partial and the panel loader functions usage. Let's search for how the existing action plan JS initializes these and whether panel's `initSsmaActionPlanCharts` would search all elements with the id or `getElementById`. If they use getElementById, duplicate is a real problem.
Let me check where `initSsmaActionPlanCharts` is defined (probably in _tab_action_plan inline script or public/js/ssma/action_plan.js).
Tool Calls (3)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "initSsmaActionPlanCharts"}
Result
File: .opencodereview/rules/ssma/action-plan-panel.md
Match lines: 1
73|- `initSsmaActionPlanCharts` / `reflowSsmaActionPlanCharts` (definidos em `_tab_action_plan.html.twig`, expostos em `window`) só rodam quando os containers existem no DOM (`hasSsmaActionPlanDistributionCharts`). Em `action_plan_panel.js`, `initDistributionCharts`/`reflowDistributionCharts` chamam esses helpers ao renderizar/redimensionar a visão Pendências.
File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js
Match lines: 2
1781| if (typeof window.initSsmaActionPlanCharts === 'function') {
1782| window.initSsmaActionPlanCharts();
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_action_plan.html.twig
Match lines: 3
667| function initSsmaActionPlanCharts() {
950| initSsmaActionPlanCharts();
956| setTimeout(initSsmaActionPlanCharts, 80);
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "ssma-action-plan-project-gauge"}
Result
File: .opencodereview/rules/ssma/action-plan-panel.md
Match lines: 1
72|- **Layout Ações vs Painel (intencional):** a aba **Ações** (`_tab_action_plan.html.twig`) exibe a tabela em largura total (`col-12` em `_action_plan_table.html.twig`). Gráficos de distribuição (`ssma-action-plan-type-bar`, `ssma-action-plan-deadline-bar`) e gauges (`ssma-action-plan-project-gauge`, `ssma-action-plan-resolution-gauge`) ficam na aba **Painel** (`_tab_painel.html.twig`), alimentados por `action_plan_data` (bar_charts/gauges). Não recolocar charts na aba Ações sem alinhamento de produto. Esses 4 charts **não** passam pelos filtros AJAX do Painel (`/panel/filter`) — comportamento herdado da #685, não regressão desta PR.
File: public/css/ssma/action_plan_panel.css
Match lines: 1
1247|#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root #ssma-action-plan-project-gauge,
File: public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js
Match lines: 2
2099| containerId: 'ssma-action-plan-project-gauge',
2104| rows: [['Taxa com projetos', gaugeValueFromDom('ssma-action-plan-project-gauge')]],
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_action_plan.html.twig
Match lines: 5
133|#ssma-action-plan-project-gauge,
252| <div class="app-card-surface h-100" id="ssma-action-plan-project-gauge-card">
257| <div id="ssma-action-plan-project-gauge" style="height: 360px; min-height: 360px;">{{ action_plan_empty_chart_state }}</div>
625| 'ssma-action-plan-project-gauge',
698| $('#ssma-action-plan-project-gauge, #ssma-action-plan-resolution-gauge, #ssma-action-plan-type-bar, #ssma-action-plan-deadline-bar').html(ssmaActionPlanChartEmptyStateHtml);
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig
Match lines: 2
101| <div class="app-card-surface h-100" id="ssma-action-plan-project-gauge-card">
106| <div id="ssma-action-plan-project-gauge" style="height: 360px; min-height: 360px;">{{ action_plan_empty_chart_state }}</div>
File: templates/ssma/partials/_intro_tutorial_helpers.html.twig
Match lines: 2
1219| var card = document.getElementById('ssma-action-plan-project-gauge-card');
1227| var gauge = document.getElementById('ssma-action-plan-project-gauge');
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "_actions_bar_chart"}
Result
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_action_plan.html.twig
Match lines: 2
276| {% include 'ssma/partials/_actions_bar_chart.html.twig' with {
285| {% include 'ssma/partials/_actions_bar_chart.html.twig' with {
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig
Match lines: 2
80| {% include 'ssma/partials/_actions_bar_chart.html.twig' with {
89| {% include 'ssma/partials/_actions_bar_chart.html.twig' with {
Request #21
deepseek-v4-flash
P:97.23K C:2.52K CR:96.13K CW:0
20077ms
Reasoning
Interesting. There's an opencode rule doc saying the gauges and distribution charts "ficam na aba Painel" and shouldn't be placed in Ações. But in the actual current state of `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` (existing code, not part of the diff), the gauges and bar charts ARE still present in the Ações tab (lines 252-293). The rule doc says "Gráficos de distribuição ... ficam na aba Painel ... Não recolocar charts na aba Ações". This suggests a design decision to move them to the Painel tab, but the existing Ações tab still has them (maybe future PR removes them?). Since _tab_action_plan is NOT part of this review group, and the doc indicates the final layout intends Painel to hold them, but the Ações tab still renders them too...
Hmm. The doc says "Layout Ações vs Painel (intencional): a aba Ações ... Gráficos de distribuição ... ficam na aba Painel ... Não recolocar charts na aba Ações sem alinhamento". That suggests the doc is describing the target layout where distribution charts are in Painel. But the current `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` still contains these charts. So maybe the plan was to remove them from Ações but the removal didn't happen in this PR? Wait, this PR is only about adding the Painel tab; maybe removal from Ações is in a different commit or wasn't done yet.
If Ações tab still renders these charts AND Painel also renders the same chart IDs, we get duplicate IDs on the same page. This is a real cross-file finding that emerges from this PR adding the Painel content with duplicated chart container IDs while the actions tab also renders those charts.
But wait — maybe in the target layout, when Painel is added, the Ações tab charts will be removed (per rule). But since we review the current state, the new files (in review group) introduce duplicate IDs on the same page with existing templates. This is a cross-file concern that touches files within the review group (the new _tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig adds them).
Let me verify the existing _tab_action_plan still contains them (lines 252-293). Yes it does (shown above). So there will be duplicate IDs: `ssma-action-plan-project-gauge`, `ssma-action-plan-resolution-gauge`, `ssma-action-plan-type-bar`, `ssma-action-plan-deadline-bar`, plus `ssma-action-plan-project-gauge-card` duplicates too (the wrapper id).
Also `_intro_tutorial_helpers.html.twig` uses `getElementById('ssma-action-plan-project-gauge')` for the intro tutorial; duplicates break.
Also duplicate containers mean: `initSsmaActionPlanCharts` defined in `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` (inline script) - it will initialize charts into first-matched element by id (jQuery `$('#ssma-action-plan-project-gauge')` selects first). Actually jQuery `$('#id')` returns first match only. Highcharts `.highcharts()` on first match.
When the panel's visao_geral view calls initSsmaActionPlanCharts (via renderOverviewCharts), the charts initialize into the first containers — which belong to the actions tab (hidden when painel visible). So the painel's visao_geral gauges/bars might stay empty/incorrect while actions tab (hidden) receives the charts. Conversely, the initial load init in _tab_action_plan's inline JS (on DOMContentLoaded / tab shown) also initializes charts into the same first containers.
So the same element gets initialized twice: once by the actions tab inline script on load (if visible) and once by the painel when opening the visao_geral. Highcharts on an already-initialized container will throw "Chart already initialized" unless the init checks/re-renders carefully.
Actually, given `_tab_action_plan` is rendered with `action_plan_actions` empty, the else branch might not run and charts/gauges not present? Wait the gauges/bar chart render inside `{% if action_plan_actions|length == 0 %} ... empty state ... {% else %} ... charts ... {% endif %}`. Looking at lines 190-197: if actions empty → just empty state, no charts. If actions present → include highcharts loader + charts. In the painel visao_geral, the charts are rendered unconditionally.
So duplicates only happen when action_plan_actions non-empty (common scenario with data). Then yes duplicates.
However, is the Ações tab content still showing charts after this PR? The doc suggests the intended final state removed them from Ações, but the code here shows they remain. Possibly removal is done in another file not in this diff? No—the Ações tab template wasn't modified in this PR. So the duplicate situation stands in current code state.
Actually, wait: I need to re-check whether the rule doc reflects the target state of the branch (after all intended commits) or of the final branch. The doc is added in the same branch? It's in .opencodereview rules. It says these charts ficam na aba Painel and "Não recolocar charts na aba Ações". This contradicts the current _tab_action_plan which still has them; unless the action plan tab's JS only initializes these charts when in the actions tab visible? It's still duplicate id in DOM.
Hmm. This seems like a real finding but the severity could be disputed given the rule doc implies a future refactor. But the fact remains: as this PR merges, page contains duplicate IDs. It should be reported as a cross-file issue with medium severity, at least alert to align.
Actually, wait. Let me reconsider: the doc says "a aba Ações (`_tab_action_plan.html.twig`) exibe a tabela em largura total (`col-12` em `_action_plan_table.html.twig`). Gráficos de distribuição ... e gauges ... ficam na aba Painel". This describes the state in `_tab_action_plan` at some point - possibly the same branch later removed those charts from actions tab. But in the current file read (which is the current branch state after the changes), those charts ARE still in _tab_action_plan at lines 244-293. Wait let me double check by reading the section: lines 244-293 shown include gauges and bar charts. So they still exist in current file.
Let me look more carefully at _tab_action_plan layout around line 244: `{% include 'ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_table.html.twig' with ... %}` followed by `<div class="col-12 col-xl-4 d-flex flex-column">` with gauges. So yes.
Therefore duplicate IDs real.
Let me also double-check whether the gauges containers in _tab_action_plan use `ssma-action-plan-project-gauge-card` wrapper id duplicated.
Painel visao_geral also has `ssma-action-plan-project-gauge-card` id.
Given the tutorial helper references this by id as well, duplication is harmful.
But hold on — is `_tab_painel` even included when user is on Ações tab? Yes, all tab panels included; only display none toggled. So duplicates exist always.
Alright, this is a strong new finding. Cross-file issue between new `_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig` and existing `_tab_action_plan.html.twig`. Let me formulate: "Os mesmos containers de gráfico (ids ssma-action-plan-type-bar/deadline-bar/project-gauge/resolution-gauge) são renderizados tanto na aba 'Plano de Ação' (já existente) quanto na nova aba Painel/Visão Geral; como as duas abas ficam no DOM ao mesmo tempo, os ids ficam duplicados e os scripts (initSsmaActionPlanCharts etc., que usam getElementById/jQuery) vão iniciar o gráfico no primeiro nó — o da aba oculta — deixando a aba Painel sem gráfico ou gerando erro de double init. Remover da aba Ações (conforme layout descrito) ou renomear os ids no Painel."
Severity medium.
Wait, but one nuance: could the painel visao_geral containers be inside `#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root`, and the existing ones inside `#tab_plano_acoes_content`. Both present. Yes.
Now, is there an argument that _tab_action_plan only renders charts when its tab is the "Plano de Ação" content? The actions content is in DOM regardless (tab-panel divs are all rendered with display toggled). Both are rendered server-side. Yes duplicate.
Let me verify the visao_geral's chart partials are rendered within painel regardless of default view — yes, because `_tab_painel.html.twig` includes visao_geral tab content within a d-none div. So even the Pendências-only user page (default) will have duplicate ids because visao_geral hidden still rendered.
OK, this is a real finding.
Now, let me look for other cross-file issues:
**Gauge CSS**: `.ssma-action-plan-chart-title` defined in both `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` and inline in `_tab_painel.html.twig`? Yes in _tab_painel they define `.ssma-action-plan-chart-title` too (line in inline style). Fine.
Let me now double check the `container-type` bug that CSS `@container ap-ia-inner` maybe is legitimate; confirmed #1.
Now examine `index.html.twig` tab handling: `defaultPlanoTab` variable `ssmaPlanoAcaoActiveTab` may include e.g., 'tab_plano_painel'. But tab pills rendered for actions/painel/config/perm. When `ssmaCanManageConfig` false, config tab not included; if ssmaPlanoAcaoActiveTab is config and user lacks permission (e.g., someone hits ?tab=tab_plano_config without permission), the tabs component default_tab is not among rendered tabs, and content div for config is not rendered; default tab logic? Let's inspect how `_tabs.html.twig` handles default_tab and query param. If default_tab references a tab that doesn't exist among tabs, maybe it shows no tab and all content panels hidden? In old template default_tab was always tab_plano_acoes, which always exists. Now the default depends on ssmaPlanoAcaoActiveTab provided by controller. If controller passes 'tab_plano_config' only when user can manage, fine. But the query param 'tab' could be arbitrary: e.g., `?tab=tab_plano_painel` — painel tab exists for everyone. `?tab=tab_plano_config` — the tabs component may handle query param to select; if not rendered, maybe fails gracefully? Need to see tabs component code to confirm behavior. Let me read the _tabs component quickly.
Also note in old template, they used a plain include without query param support; now added `query_tab_param: 'tab'`, enabling server to select from query. If query param invalid, fallback to defaultPlanoTab.
Let me read the component `_tabs.html.twig` to check what it does when default_tab isn't among tabs.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "templates/components/ui/_tabs.html.twig"}
Result
File: templates/components/ui/_tabs.html.twig (Total lines: 247)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-247
1|{#
2| Reusable tabs component.
3|
4| Styles are loaded from:
5| - public/css/metahuman-standard/components/_tabs.css
6|
7| JavaScript is loaded from:
8| - public/js/metahuman-standard/components/_tabs.js
9|
10| Usage with content rendered by the component:
11| {% include 'components/ui/_tabs.html.twig' with {
12| 'tabs_id': 'member_tabs',
13| 'tabs': {
14| 'tab1': {'label': 'Tab 1', 'template': 'path/to/template1.html.twig'},
15| 'tab2': {'label': 'Tab 2', 'template': 'path/to/template2.html.twig'}
16| },
17| 'default_tab': 'tab1'
18| } %}
19|
20| Usage with existing divs on the page:
21| {% include 'components/ui/_tabs.html.twig', {
22| 'tabs_id': 'member_profile_tabs',
23| 'tabs': [
24| {'id': 'visao_geral', 'label': 'Visão Geral', 'target_div': 'visao-geral-section'},
25| {'id': 'dados_colaborador', 'label': 'Dados do Colaborador', 'target_div': 'dados-colaborador-section'}
26| ],
27| 'use_existing_divs': true,
28| 'default_tab': 'visao_geral'
29| } %}
30|
31| Opcional (use_existing_divs): active_panel_display (padrão 'block'), link_extra_class em todas as abas,
32| link_data_tab_attribute: true para renderizar data-tab="{{ tab.id }}" em cada link.
33|
34| FOUC: critical <style> below hides inactive panels before first paint (no consumer page changes needed).
35|#}
36|
37|{% set use_existing_divs = use_existing_divs|default(false) %}
38|{% set tabsId = tabs_id|default('app_tabs') %}
39|{% set tabsLinkExtraClass = link_extra_class|default('') %}
40|{% set tabs = tabs|default([]) %}
41|{% if use_existing_divs %}
42| {% set firstTab = tabs|first %}
43| {% set defaultTab = default_tab|default(firstTab ? firstTab.id : null) %}
44|{% else %}
45| {% set defaultTab = default_tab|default(tabs|keys|first) %}
46|{% endif %}
47|
48|<div class="app-tabs-bar" {% if sticky|default(false) %}data-sticky="true"{% endif %}>
49| <div class="app-tabs"
50| id="{{ tabsId }}"
51| data-mhs-tabs="true"
52| data-mhs-tabs-existing-divs="{{ use_existing_divs ? 'true' : 'false' }}"
53| {% if use_existing_divs %}data-mhs-tabs-query-param="{{ query_tab_param|default('') }}"
54| data-mhs-tabs-active-display="{{ active_panel_display|default('block') }}"{% endif %}>
55| {# overflow só em .app-tabs (tabs.css) — overflow aqui duplicava scrollport e cortava o traço da aba ativa #}
56| <div class="d-flex flex-nowrap nav mhs-tabs-nav app-tabs-inner-row">
57| {% if use_existing_divs %}
58| {% for tab in tabs %}
59| <a class="app-tab-link {% if defaultTab == tab.id %}active{% endif %} {{ tabsLinkExtraClass }} {{ tab.link_extra_class|default('') }}"
60| id="{{ tab.id }}_tab"
61| href="#"
62| role="tab"
63| data-target-div="#{{ tab.target_div }}"
64| {% if link_data_tab_attribute|default(false) %}data-tab="{{ tab.id }}"{% endif %}>
65| {{ tab.label }}
66| </a>
67| {% endfor %}
68| {% else %}
69| {% for key, tab in tabs %}
70| <a class="app-tab-link {% if defaultTab == key %}active{% endif %}"
71| id="{{ key }}_tab"
72| data-bs-toggle="tab"
73| href="#{{ key }}_content"
74| role="tab">
75| {{ tab.label }}
76| </a>
77| {% endfor %}
78| {% endif %}
79| </div>
80| </div>
81|</div>
82|
83|{# Critical CSS: hide inactive panels before first paint (panels may render later in the page) #}
84|<style id="{{ tabsId }}-critical">
85|{% if use_existing_divs %}
86|{% for tab in tabs %}
87|{% if tab.target_div is defined and tab.id != defaultTab %}
88|#{{ tab.target_div }} { display: none !important; }
89|{% endif %}
90|{% endfor %}
91|{% else %}
92|#{{ tabsId }}_content > .tab-pane:not(.active) { display: none !important; }
93|{% endif %}
94|</style>
95|
96|{% if use_existing_divs %}
97|{# Sync visibility before metahuman-standard/_tabs.js — fallback for OB/ON layouts and deep links #}
98|<script>
99|(function () {
100| var tabsContainerId = {{ tabsId|json_encode|raw }};
101| var activePanelDisplay = {{ active_panel_display|default('block')|json_encode|raw }};
102| var queryTabParam = {{ query_tab_param|default('')|json_encode|raw }};
103|
104| function setPanelDisplay(panel, value) {
105| if (!panel) {
106| return;
107| }
108|
109| panel.style.setProperty('display', value, 'important');
110| }
111|
112| function resolveDeepLinkTabId(tabsContainer) {
113| var queryTabId = '';
114|
115| if (queryTabParam) {
116| try {
117| var queryValue = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search).get(queryTabParam);
118| queryTabId = queryValue ? String(queryValue).trim() : '';
119| } catch (e) {
120| queryTabId = '';
121| }
122| }
123|
124| var hashTabId = (window.location.hash || '').replace(/^#/, '').trim();
125| var deepLinkTabId = queryTabId || hashTabId;
126|
127| if (!deepLinkTabId) {
128| return null;
129| }
130|
131| return tabsContainer.querySelector('#' + deepLinkTabId + '_tab');
132| }
133|
134| function syncExistingDivTabPanels() {
135| var tabsContainer = document.getElementById(tabsContainerId);
136| if (!tabsContainer) {
137| return;
138| }
139|
140| var tabsContent = document.getElementById('tabsContentContainer');
141| if (tabsContent && tabsContent.style.display === 'none') {
142| return;
143| }
144|
145| var layout = document.querySelector('.onboarding-layout, .offboarding-layout');
146| var panelSelector = layout
147| ? '.onboarding-tab-panel, .offboarding-tab-panel'
148| : null;
149| var links = tabsContainer.querySelectorAll('.app-tab-link[data-target-div]');
150| var deepLinkTab = resolveDeepLinkTabId(tabsContainer);
151| var activeLink = deepLinkTab || tabsContainer.querySelector('.app-tab-link.active') || links[0];
152| var targetSelector = activeLink ? activeLink.getAttribute('data-target-div') : null;
153| if (targetSelector && targetSelector.charAt(0) !== '#' && targetSelector.charAt(0) !== '.') {
154| targetSelector = '#' + targetSelector;
155| }
156| var target = targetSelector ? document.querySelector(targetSelector) : null;
157|
158| if (!target && panelSelector && layout) {
159| var panels = layout.querySelectorAll(panelSelector);
160| target = panels.length ? panels[0] : null;
161| if (target && target.id) {
162| targetSelector = '#' + target.id;
163| }
164| if (target && links.length) {
165| links.forEach(function (link) {
166| link.classList.remove('active');
167| });
168| var fallbackLink = tabsContainer.querySelector('.app-tab-link[data-target-div="#' + target.id + '"]');
169| if (fallbackLink) {
170| fallbackLink.classList.add('active');
171| activeLink = fallbackLink;
172| }
173| }
174| }
175|
176| if (!target) {
177| return;
178| }
179|
180| if (panelSelector && layout) {
181| layout.querySelectorAll(panelSelector).forEach(function (panel) {
182| setPanelDisplay(panel, 'none');
183| });
184| }
185|
186| links.forEach(function (link) {
187| var selector = link.getAttribute('data-target-div');
188| if (!selector) {
189| return;
190| }
191|
192| if (selector.charAt(0) !== '#' && selector.charAt(0) !== '.') {
193| selector = '#' + selector;
194| }
195|
196| var panel = document.querySelector(selector);
197| if (!panel) {
198| return;
199| }
200|
201| if (link === activeLink) {
202| setPanelDisplay(panel, activePanelDisplay);
203| return;
204| }
205|
206| setPanelDisplay(panel, 'none');
207| });
208|
209| if (activeLink) {
210| links.forEach(function (link) {
211| link.classList.remove('active');
212| });
213| activeLink.classList.add('active');
214| }
215| }
216|
217| window.mhsSyncExistingDivTabPanels = window.mhsSyncExistingDivTabPanels || {};
218| window.mhsSyncExistingDivTabPanels[tabsContainerId] = syncExistingDivTabPanels;
219|
220| if (document.readyState === 'loading') {
221| document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', syncExistingDivTabPanels);
222| } else {
223| syncExistingDivTabPanels();
224| }
225|
226| window.addEventListener('load', syncExistingDivTabPanels);
227|})();
228|</script>
229|{% endif %}
230|
231|{% if not use_existing_divs %}
232| <div class="tab-content" id="{{ tabsId }}_content" data-mhs-tabs-content="true">
233| {% for key, tab in tabs %}
234| <div class="tab-pane fade {% if defaultTab == key %}show active{% endif %}"
235| id="{{ key }}_content"
236| role="tabpanel">
237| {% if tab.template is defined %}
238| {% include tab.template %}
239| {% elseif tab.content is defined %}
240| {{ tab.content|raw }}
241| {% endif %}
242| </div>
243| {% endfor %}
244| </div>
245|{% endif %}
246|
247|
Request #22
deepseek-v4-flash
P:102.43K C:831 CR:99.71K CW:0
7000ms
Reasoning
The tabs component handles query param deep links. The `data-target-div="#tab_plano_acoes_content"`? Wait, look: in index.html.twig they use `'target_div': 'tab_plano_acoes_content'` but the _tabs component uses `data-target-div="#{{ tab.target_div }}"`, i.e., `#tab_plano_acoes_content`. Fine.
Also the painel's own observe code checks `link.getAttribute('data-target-div')` contains 'tab_plano_painel_content' — but target_div attr is "#tab_plano_painel_content". `target.indexOf('tab_plano_painel_content') !== -1` matches even with '#'. Fine.
Now, on query param `tab=tab_plano_painel`: The component's sync syncs panels to show correct one. However, the JS `syncExistingDivTabPanels` finds deep link from query param, sets correct panel visible, sets active class on link. Then the action plan panel JS observePainelTab listens for click on `#plano_acao_tabs .app-tab-link` and on `tabShown` events and checks offsetParent not null at DOMContentLoaded. So on page load with tab param painel, initial panel content visible via component sync; painel JS will see `painelPanel.offsetParent !== null` and call onPainelTabVisible? observePainelTab runs on DOMContentLoaded. But the component sync runs on DOMContentLoaded too (registered earlier since _tabs include is at top). Both on DOMContentLoaded — order depends on registration order. The tabs include script is registered when header renders (before content). The painel JS is loaded at the bottom of _tab_painel, with DOMContentLoaded listener registered when its script executes (after parsing completes? Actually script runs during parse, registers listener before DOMContentLoaded). Hmm the scripts at bottom of body execute during parse; DOMContentLoaded fires after parse. Both listeners will run in registration order: component inline script (in header) registers first; then painel JS registers later (bottom). On DOMContentLoaded, syncExistingDivTabPanels runs first showing the panel, then painel's onPainelTabVisible checks offsetParent != null → true → init. Good.
The else branch triggers `triggerPanelFilter(currentView)` etc.
Now the duplicate IDs concern seems most significant new finding.
Let me also check that `_tab_painel.html.twig`'s inline style selector targets `#ssma-ap-chart-axis-filter` styled, good.
Now, maybe verify the AJAX backend route existence (ssma_plano_acao_panel_filter) outside repo? That's backend; not in review. But if route name missing would break; search route names across repo to confirm the route exists (controller changed elsewhere). It's probably in src/Controller in a different file not part of PR. Let me search quickly to confirm; but it's backend and likely present.
Given the review file set only includes templates and assets, the backend route is presumably in another changed file not in this review set (mentioned "Other changed files" blank). Search for route existence to ensure contract.
Let me quickly search for 'ssma_plano_acao_panel_filter' and 'ssmaPlanoAcaoActiveTab'.
Tool Calls (3)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "plano_acao_panel_filter"}
Result
File: .opencodereview/rules/ssma/action-plan-panel.md
Match lines: 2
31|- As rotas `ssma_plano_acao_painel` (`GET /manager/ssma/plano-acao/painel`) e `ssma_plano_acao_panel_filter` (`GET /manager/ssma/plano-acao/panel/filter`) foram registradas em `GlobalPermissionListener` nas duas listas de controle de acesso (acesso ao hub e bypass de preflight). Qualquer alteração que remova essas rotas do listener causa 403 silencioso para todos os usuários.
150|2. **Regressão no GlobalPermissionListener** — as duas entradas adicionadas (`ssma_plano_acao_painel` e `ssma_plano_acao_panel_filter`) não devem ser removidas em refatorações do listener.
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel.html.twig
Match lines: 1
301| filterUrl: path('ssma_plano_acao_panel_filter'),
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "action_plan_panel_data"}
Result
File: .opencodereview/rules/ssma/action-plan-panel.md
Match lines: 3
22|1. **`/plano-acao?tab=tab_plano_painel` abria sem KPIs** — só `planoAcaoPainel` hidratava `action_plan_panel_data`; a index não. O JS (`updateKpiRow`) só atualiza cards já renderizados no SSR.
45|- `planoAcaoIndex` (`GET /manager/ssma/plano-acao`) e `planoAcaoPainel` hidratam `action_plan_panel_data`. Sem isso a URL `?tab=tab_plano_painel` renderiza a aba Painel **sem** os 4 KPIs (o JS só atualiza cards já existentes).
151|3. **`planoAcaoIndex` sem `action_plan_panel_data`** — regressão que deixa a linha de KPIs vazia em `?tab=tab_plano_painel`.
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel.html.twig
Match lines: 1
2|{% set panel = action_plan_panel_data|default({}) %}
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "ssmaPlanoAcaoActiveTab"}
Result
File: .opencodereview/rules/ssma/action-plan-panel.md
Match lines: 1
44|- Renderiza `ssma/action_plan/index.html.twig` com `ssmaPlanoAcaoActiveTab = tab_plano_painel`.
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/index.html.twig
Match lines: 1
23|{% set defaultPlanoTab = ssmaPlanoAcaoActiveTab|default('tab_plano_acoes') %}
Request #23
deepseek-v4-flash
P:103.92K C:1.05K CR:103.17K CW:0
8421ms
Reasoning
OK, these are referenced in the opencode rules doc which describes the intended backend implementation. Since backend not in the review set, I'll not comment on route registration.
Now, let me review the JS file for issues once more, focusing on concrete bugs not already in confirmed findings.
Let me re-examine the JS code near chart data serialization and SSR mismatch. Let me read some sections of the JS file.
Actually, let me review potential mismatches between what SSR JSON data contains and what JS expects. The JS uses panelData.charts.critical_pending_by_deadline.labels, .validation, .execution, .axes, .default_axis. Twig references panel_charts.critical_pending_by_deadline.axes etc. Consistent within PR.
Potential additional bug: in `applyPendenciasDom` they call `updateAxisFilterOptions((panel.charts || {}).critical_pending_by_deadline || {})`. `updateAxisFilterOptions` reads `chartData.axes`; but SSR select default axes is filled from backend. After fetch, axes updated with selected option. panelState.axis updated. OK.
Now for `renderPendenciasCharts`, the function waits for Highcharts then renders. It first checks the section not hidden. In the filter path `applyFilterResponse` → `renderPendenciasCharts()` which triggers waitHighcharts. Fine.
But consider initial page load with default pendencias and SSR labels present; renderPendenciasCharts called via switchView in onPainelTabVisible. waitHighcharts loads. OK.
Now consider the **very first render** when charts render before CSS/HTML done? Fine.
Potential real bug: `renderTopResponsibleChart` calls `destroyChart('topResponsible')` twice (once early, once after computing). Harmless.
**Potential XSS found elsewhere:** `buildAdrianaInsightsHtml` returns `<li>` with `item` raw — confirmed #3. `escapeHtml` elsewhere fine.
**A real potential bug in `openActionViewOffcanvas`:** covered by confirmed #2 (IDs don't exist) — skip.
Let me now examine the `_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig` partial to see if there's a mismatch with what JS updates. Actually there is the transition bug discussed; plus the CSS selectors referenced by confirmed #1 target `.ssma-ap-overview-semantic-*` classes not present.
But also there is `.ssma-adriana-questions-title` and `.ssma-adriana-split` and `.ssma-adriana-insights-col` classes that are targeted by the occurrences panel CSS imported in _tab_painel (`_panel_semantic_adriana_styles.html.twig`). Good.
**Wait:** In _tab_painel, they include `ssma/occurrence/tabs/panel/_panel_semantic_adriana_styles.html.twig`. Let me check that those styles contain `.ssma-adriana-split` and `suggestion-card` styles. Probably yes.
Now potential issue: The pendencias semantic partial renders `{% include 'components/ui/_pill.html.twig' %}` and an extra hidden pill div to ensure CSS loaded. Hmm. They add `<div class="d-none">{% include pill %}</div>` at top of painel root. That is a hack to force-load pill component CSS? Because they use mhs-pill classes in JS-generated HTML (buildSemanticPillGroup uses 'mhs-pill ...'). To guarantee CSS exists, they render a hidden pill. Not blocking but odd.
Let me check the pill component classes for `mhs-pill mhs-pill--sm mhs-pill--company`. In JS `buildSemanticPillGroup` outputs class `mhs-pill mhs-pill--sm mhs-pill--company`. Also `buildPendenciasTableRowHtml` uses `mhs-pill mhs-pill--sm mhs-pill--' + priorityPillClass(...)` where priorityPillClass returns 'red'/'teal'/'gray'. So class becomes e.g., `mhs-pill--red`. Do the pill component CSS define variants red/teal/gray? The Twig pill include takes color param and probably maps. JS building color variants relies on existing CSS variant classes that may exist in the pill component global CSS (mhs-pill--red etc.). Let me check the pill component quickly to see which variant classes exist.
Let me read `components/ui/_pill.html.twig`.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "templates/components/ui/_pill.html.twig"}
Result
File: templates/components/ui/_pill.html.twig (Total lines: 88)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-88
1|{#
2| Componente Pill Reutilizável
3|
4| Uso:
5| {% include 'components/ui/_pill.html.twig' with {
6| 'label': 'Ótima',
7| 'color': 'green',
8| 'size': 'sm'
9| } %}
10|
11| @param string label - Texto exibido dentro da pill.
12| @param string color - Variante de cor: green | yellow | teal | red | gray | company | company2 | orange (default: gray)
13| @param string size - Tamanho: sm | md | lg | xl (default: sm)
14| @param string icon - Classe FontAwesome opcional antes do texto (ex.: fas fa-check)
15|#}
16|{% set pillColor = color|default('gray') %}
17|{% set pillSize = size|default('sm') %}
18|{% set pillIcon = icon|default('') %}
19|{% set pillExtraClass = extra_class|default(class|default('')) %}
20|{% set pillAttributes = attributes|default({}) %}
21|{% set pillTag = tag|default('span') %}
22|
23|<{{ pillTag }} class="mhs-pill mhs-pill--{{ pillSize }} mhs-pill--{{ pillColor }}{% if pillIcon %} mhs-pill--with-icon{% endif %}{% if pillExtraClass %} {{ pillExtraClass }}{% endif %}"
24| {% if pillTag == 'button' %}type="button"{% endif %}
25| {% for attrName, attrValue in pillAttributes %}
26| {{ attrName }}="{{ attrValue }}"
27| {% endfor %}>
28| {% if pillIcon %}
29| <i class="{{ pillIcon }} mhs-pill-icon" aria-hidden="true"></i>
30| {% endif %}
31| <span class="mhs-pill-label">{{ label|default('') }}</span>
32|</{{ pillTag }}>
33|
34|
35|{# Styles injected once — JS removes duplicate blocks if component is included multiple times #}
36|<style class="mhs-pill-defs">
37| .mhs-pill {
38| border-radius: 999px;
39| font-weight: 500;
40| border: 1px solid;
41| display: inline-flex;
42| align-items: center;
43| justify-content: center;
44| gap: 4px;
45| white-space: nowrap;
46| line-height: 1.1;
47| }
48| .mhs-pill-label { min-width: 0; overflow: hidden; text-overflow: ellipsis; }
49| .mhs-pill-icon {
50| font-size: 0.9em;
51| line-height: 1;
52| flex: 0 0 auto;
53| }
54|
55| /* Sizes */
56| /* Reduced horizontal padding to avoid awkward icon/text spacing */
57| .mhs-pill--sm { padding: 4px 10px; font-size: 12px; }
58| .mhs-pill--md { padding: 5px 12px; font-size: 13px; }
59| .mhs-pill--lg { padding: 6px 14px; font-size: 14px; }
60| .mhs-pill--xl { padding: 8px 18px; font-size: 15px; }
61|
62| /* Colors */
63| .mhs-pill--green { color: #317234; background: #EDF7EE; border-color: #CDE9CE; }
64| .mhs-pill--yellow { color: #9a6700; background: #fef3c7; border-color: #e4c86a; }
65| .mhs-pill--orange { color: #ea580c; background: #ffedd5; border-color: #fdba74; }
66| .mhs-pill--teal { color: #186073; background: #e0f2f5; border-color: #186073; }
67| .mhs-pill--company { color: var(--app-brand-primary-emphasis, var(--company-theme1-800, #135C66)); background: color-mix(in srgb, var(--app-brand-primary, #186073) 12%, transparent); border-color: var(--app-brand-primary, var(--company-theme1, #186073)); }
68| .mhs-pill--company2 { color: var(--company-theme2-800, #43565C); background: color-mix(in srgb, var(--app-brand-secondary, var(--company-theme2)) 12%, transparent); border-color: var(--app-brand-secondary, var(--company-theme2)); }
69| .mhs-pill--red { color: #b91c1c; background: #fee2e2; border-color: #b91c1c; }
70| .mhs-pill--gray { color: #4b5563; background: #f3f4f6; border-color: #d1d5db; }
71|
72| /* Optional dot — inherits currentColor from the pill variant */
73| .mhs-pill-dot {
74| width: 8px;
75| height: 8px;
76| border-radius: 50%;
77| background-color: currentColor;
78| flex-shrink: 0;
79| margin-right: 5px;
80| }
81|</style>
82|<script>
83|(function () {
84| var blocks = document.querySelectorAll('style.mhs-pill-defs');
85| for (var i = 1; i < blocks.length; i++) { blocks[i].remove(); }
86|})();
87|</script>
88|
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "mhs-pill--red"}
Result
File: public/css/contractor/contractor-parceiras.css
Match lines: 1
1377|.contractor-parceiras-page #contractorCoTable td .mhs-pill--red {
File: public/css/governance/governance-hub-layout.css
Match lines: 1
326|.governance-hub-page .mhs-pill--red { color: #b91c1c; background: #fee2e2; border-color: #b91c1c; }
File: public/css/governance/member-pendencies.css
Match lines: 1
178|#member-governance-pendencies-page .mhs-pill--red {
File: public/js/governance/governance-authorization-view-monitoring.js
Match lines: 3
482| return { primary: { className: 'mhs-pill--red', label: 'Não conforme' }, secondary: null, alert: alert };
490| return { primary: { className: 'mhs-pill--red', label: 'Não conforme' }, secondary: null, alert: alert };
608| nao_conforme: 'mhs-pill--red',
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationComplianceViewService.php
Match lines: 4
2086| 'primary' => ['className' => 'mhs-pill--red', 'label' => 'Não conforme'],
2095| 'primary' => ['className' => 'mhs-pill--red', 'label' => 'Não conforme'],
2136| 'primary' => ['className' => 'mhs-pill--red', 'label' => 'Não conforme'],
2148| 'primary' => ['className' => 'mhs-pill--red', 'label' => 'Não conforme'],
File: templates/company/_autorizacoes_javascript.html.twig
Match lines: 11
1009| return { className: 'mhs-pill--red', label: 'Não conforme', alert: alert };
1011| return { className: 'mhs-pill--red', label: 'Não conforme', alert: null };
1019| return { className: 'mhs-pill--red', label: 'Não conforme', alert: null };
1027| return { className: 'mhs-pill--red', label: 'Não conforme', alert: alert };
1338| $pill.removeClass('mhs-pill--green mhs-pill--yellow mhs-pill--red mhs-pill--orange').addClass(state.className);
1514| nao_conforme: 'mhs-pill--red',
1540| if (className === 'mhs-pill--red' || label === 'Pendente') {
1550| var statusClasses = ['mhs-pill--blocked', 'mhs-pill--orange', 'mhs-pill--red', 'mhs-pill--yellow', 'mhs-pill--green'];
1602| .removeClass('mhs-pill--blocked mhs-pill--red mhs-pill--yellow mhs-pill--green mhs-pill--orange')
1609| .removeClass('mhs-pill--blocked mhs-pill--red mhs-pill--yellow mhs-pill--green mhs-pill--orange')
1782| .removeClass('mhs-pill--blocked mhs-pill--red mhs-pill--yellow mhs-pill--green')
File: templates/company/members_v2.html.twig
Match lines: 1
497| {% set member_status_class = member_status_key in ['bloqueado', 'nao_conforme'] ? 'mhs-pill--red' : (member_status_key == 'inativo' ? 'mhs-pill--gray' : 'mhs-pill--green') %}
File: templates/company/partials/_member_authorization_card.html.twig
Match lines: 1
12| {% set statusPillClass = 'mhs-pill--red' %}
File: templates/company/partials/_member_authorizations_table.html.twig
Match lines: 1
27| {% set statusPillClass = 'mhs-pill--red' %}
File: templates/components/ui/_pill.html.twig
Match lines: 1
69| .mhs-pill--red { color: #b91c1c; background: #fee2e2; border-color: #b91c1c; }
File: templates/contractor/tabs/_tab_empresas.html.twig
Match lines: 1
1038| return 'mhs-pill--red';
File: templates/free-trial/company_activation_companies.html.twig
Match lines: 2
828| $('[data-company-plan-feature-status]').removeClass('mhs-pill--red').addClass('mhs-pill--green').text('Incluído');
859| .toggleClass('mhs-pill--red', !isEnabled)
File: templates/governance/authorization/partials/_offcanvas_apply_authorization_monitoring.html.twig
Match lines: 1
517| #autApplyMonitoring-offcanvas-wrapper .governance-auth-status-pill.mhs-pill--red {
File: templates/governance/authorization/tabs/_tab_authorizations_monitoring.html.twig
Match lines: 3
1312| return { className: 'mhs-pill--red', label: 'Não conforme' };
1324| return { className: 'mhs-pill--red', label: 'Não conforme' };
1329| return { className: 'mhs-pill--red', label: 'Não conforme' };
File: templates/new_home/manager_home.html.twig
Match lines: 1
2170| .removeClass('mhs-pill--green mhs-pill--yellow mhs-pill--teal mhs-pill--red mhs-pill--gray mhs-pill--company mhs-pill--company2')
File: templates/new_home/member_home.html.twig
Match lines: 1
1109| .removeClass('mhs-pill--green mhs-pill--yellow mhs-pill--teal mhs-pill--red mhs-pill--gray mhs-pill--company mhs-pill--company2')
File: templates/servicePackages/index.html.twig
Match lines: 2
345| var pillClass = isActive ? 'mhs-pill--green' : 'mhs-pill--red';
348| .removeClass('mhs-pill--green mhs-pill--red')
File: templates/trm/campaigns/campaign/tabs/_tab_panel.html.twig
Match lines: 4
318| 'pessima': {'label': 'Péssima', 'class': 'mhs-pill--red'},
378| <span class="mhs-pill mhs-pill--lg mhs-pill--red">Péssima</span>
472| pessima: 'mhs-pill--red',
557| .removeClass('mhs-pill--gray mhs-pill--yellow mhs-pill--red mhs-pill--green')
Request #24
deepseek-v4-flash
P:107.97K C:726 CR:104.96K CW:0
7171ms
Reasoning
The pill styles are injected via the component with class style.mhs-pill-defs dedupe. In the JS file, the generated pills (`mhs-pill mhs-pill--sm mhs-pill--red`) rely on these global CSS classes being present, which is guaranteed because the pill component include injects a `<style>` block each time it's used. But when JS injects pill HTML dynamically (e.g., after AJAX filter response updates the table), the style might be missing on the page if no pill component was ever included in that page. But _tab_painel includes an SSR table with priority pills via `_pill.html.twig` in each row (priority_cell uses _pill include), so the styles will be present. Also the dummy hidden pill include at top ensures presence. Fine.
Now back to concrete new findings. Let me now verify the "insights empty-state transition" more carefully and also verify there's no other mechanism that re-renders the entire adriana partial after AJAX. Since applyFilterResponse only updates DOM parts, not the partial container wholesale. It would be a genuine bug.
But before finalizing, let me see if JS could be aware: In renderSemanticAdrianaRow, insightsEl null → skip; contentEl always present → only semantic text updated. Also for pendencias, `updateSemanticAdriana(panel.semantic, panel.adriana)` called in applyPendenciasDom on each filter fetch.
Given the SSR panel data includes `adriana` with default empty arrays (since server returns object with insights: [] etc.), the template's empty branch would be chosen for the pendencias view when there are no semantic/high risk factors etc. As soon as the filter fetch returns non-empty (e.g., user selects team with data), the empty-state placeholders remain. That's a plausible defect.
Actually wait — I need to reconsider: when initial SSR contains data (not empty), the containers exist. When a later filter returns no data (empty), the JS updates insightsEl.innerHTML with `<li>empty message</li>` (fallback li) but the ol/container exists, and questionsEl innerHTML with empty string '' (buildAdrianaQuestionsHtml returns '') — leaving the questions container empty (blank). So if initial state had data then filtered to none, the empty message still appears in the insights list (as fallback li) but questions title remains "Perguntas sugeridas" with no content, whereas the template's intended empty state shows a message. This is another minor divergence: JS handles empty→ but not with the full empty-state layout. But not a bug per se; it still shows the fallback text for insights. The questions area would be blank though. Hmm. buildAdrianaQuestionsHtml returns '' for empty questions, so questionsEl.innerHTML = '' — blank area. That is inconsistent with the template's empty message but not broken.
The bigger issue is the transition from SSR empty-state (no containers) → data, where nothing gets populated. I'll report it.
Let me search whether the occurrences panel implementation (which this code ports) handles this by always rendering containers, to strengthen. Let me search occurrences panel semantic partial.
Tool Calls (1)
file_find
Show Details
Arguments
{"query_name": "_panel_semantic_adriana"}
Result
templates/ssma/occurrence/tabs/panel/_panel_semantic_adriana.html.twig templates/ssma/occurrence/tabs/panel/_panel_semantic_adriana_styles.html.twig
Request #25
deepseek-v4-flash
P:108.76K C:67 CR:108.67K CW:0
1355ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "templates/ssma/occurrence/tabs/panel/_panel_semantic_adriana.html.twig"}
Result
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/tabs/panel/_panel_semantic_adriana.html.twig (Total lines: 360)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-360
1|{# Análise semântica + Insights da Adriana (Painel de Ocorrências) #}
2|{# context: 'occurrence' (default) | 'prevention' — muda o texto de estado vazio #}
3|{% set semantic = semantic|default(panel.semantic|default({})) %}
4|{% set adriana = adriana|default(panel.adriana|default({})) %}
5|{% set _ctx = context|default('occurrence') %}
6|{% set _noData = semantic.total_occurrences|default(0) == 0 %}
7|{% set _emptyTitle = _ctx == 'prevention'
8| ? 'Nenhum dado de prevenção no período'
9| : 'Nenhum dado no período filtrado' %}
10|{% set _emptyBody = _ctx == 'prevention'
11| ? 'Realize inspeções e abordagens para que a Adriana comece a gerar análises e sugestões automáticas.'
12| : 'Registre ocorrências para que a Adriana possa identificar padrões, fatores comuns e insights automáticos.' %}
13|{% set _emptyCta = _ctx == 'prevention'
14| ? null
15| : null %}
16|
17|<div class="row mb-3 align-items-stretch ssma-semantic-adriana-row">
18| <div class="col-12 col-lg-6 mb-2 mb-lg-0 d-flex">
19| <div class="app-card-surface ssma-dashboard-chart-card h-100 w-100">
20| <div class="px-3 py-2 border-bottom">
21| <div class="ssma-dashboard-chart-title d-inline-flex align-items-center">
22| Análise semântica
23| <button type="button"
24| class="btn p-0 text-muted ml-1 border-0 bg-transparent"
25| data-toggle="tooltip"
26| data-placement="top"
27| title="Padrões identificados nos textos dos relatos (título, atividade, descrição e local) do período filtrado, via Adriana."
28| aria-label="Informações">
29| <i class="far fa-info-circle" style="font-size:12px;"></i>
30| </button>
31| </div>
32| </div>
33| <div class="p-3">
34| {% set _semanticContent %}
35| <div class="ssma-panel-semantic">
36| {% if _noData and not semantic.loading|default(false) and semantic.summary|default('')|trim in ['', 'Sem dados no período.', 'Nenhum desvio identificado no período filtrado.', 'Nenhuma ocorrência registrada no período filtrado.'] %}
37| {% include 'components/_empty_card_state.html.twig' with {
38| icon: 'fa-magnifying-glass',
39| title: _emptyTitle,
40| subtitle: _emptyBody,
41| size: 'sm'
42| } %}
43| {% else %}
44| {% if _ctx == 'occurrence' %}
45| {% if semantic.total_occurrences|default(0) > 0 %}
46| <div class="ssma-semantic-stats ssma-semantic-stats--occurrence mb-3">
47| <div class="ssma-semantic-stat">
48| <div class="ssma-semantic-stat-value">{{ semantic.events_with_text|default(0) }}</div>
49| <div class="ssma-semantic-stat-label">Com relato</div>
50| </div>
51| <div class="ssma-semantic-stat">
52| <div class="ssma-semantic-stat-value">{{ semantic.similar_pct|default(0) }}%</div>
53| <div class="ssma-semantic-stat-label">Padrão similar</div>
54| </div>
55| </div>
56| {% endif %}
57| {% if semantic.common_factors|default([])|length > 0 %}
58| <div class="d-flex align-items-center flex-wrap mb-3" style="gap:6px;">
59| <span class="ssma-semantic-group-label">Fatores comuns:</span>
60| {% for f in semantic.common_factors %}
61| {% include 'components/ui/_pill.html.twig' with { label: f.label ~ (f.count|default(0) > 0 ? ' (' ~ f.count ~ ')' : ''), color: 'company', size: 'sm' } %}
62| {% endfor %}
63| </div>
64| {% endif %}
65| {% if semantic.high_risk_factors|default([])|length > 0 %}
66| <div class="d-flex align-items-center flex-wrap mb-3" style="gap:6px;">
67| <span class="ssma-semantic-group-label">{{ semantic.section_labels.high_risk_factors|default('Fatores com Maior Risco Potencial') }}:</span>
68| {% for t in semantic.high_risk_factors %}
69| {% include 'components/ui/_pill.html.twig' with { label: t.label ~ (t.count|default(0) > 0 ? ' (' ~ t.count ~ ')' : ''), color: 'company', size: 'sm' } %}
70| {% endfor %}
71| </div>
72| {% endif %}
73| {% if semantic.teams_associated|default(semantic.teams|default([]))|length > 0 %}
74| <div class="d-flex align-items-center flex-wrap mb-3" style="gap:6px;">
75| <span class="ssma-semantic-group-label">Equipes mais associadas:</span>
76| {% for t in semantic.teams_associated|default(semantic.teams) %}
77| {% include 'components/ui/_pill.html.twig' with { label: t.label ~ (t.count|default(0) > 0 ? ' (' ~ t.count ~ ')' : ''), color: 'gray', size: 'sm' } %}
78| {% endfor %}
79| </div>
80| {% endif %}
81| {% if semantic.type_breakdown|default([])|length > 0 %}
82| <div class="d-flex align-items-center flex-wrap mb-3" style="gap:6px;">
83| <span class="ssma-semantic-group-label">Tipos de evento:</span>
84| {% for t in semantic.type_breakdown %}
85| {% include 'components/ui/_pill.html.twig' with { label: t.label ~ (t.count|default(0) > 0 ? ' (' ~ t.count ~ ')' : ''), color: 'gray', size: 'sm' } %}
86| {% endfor %}
87| </div>
88| {% endif %}
89| {% if semantic.systemic_cause|default('')|trim != '' %}
90| <div class="ssma-semantic-note mb-3">
91| <strong>Causa sistêmica provável:</strong> {{ semantic.systemic_cause }}
92| </div>
93| {% endif %}
94| {% if semantic.focus_recommendation|default('')|trim != '' %}
95| <div class="ssma-semantic-focus mb-2">
96| <i class="fas fa-lightbulb mr-1" style="color:var(--app-brand-primary, var(--company-theme1, #186073));"></i>{{ semantic.focus_recommendation }}
97| </div>
98| {% endif %}
99| {% else %}
100| {# ── Contexto prevenção: mesmo layout visual das ocorrências ─────── #}
101| {% if semantic.total_occurrences|default(0) > 0 %}
102| <div class="ssma-semantic-stats ssma-semantic-stats--occurrence mb-3">
103| <div class="ssma-semantic-stat">
104| <div class="ssma-semantic-stat-value" id="prev-sem-desvios">{{ semantic.events_with_text|default(0) }}</div>
105| <div class="ssma-semantic-stat-label">Desvios identificados</div>
106| </div>
107| <div class="ssma-semantic-stat">
108| <div class="ssma-semantic-stat-value" id="prev-sem-similar">{{ semantic.similar_pct|default(0) }}%</div>
109| <div class="ssma-semantic-stat-label">Abordagens de risco</div>
110| </div>
111| </div>
112| {% endif %}
113|
114| <p class="mb-2 ssma-semantic-summary" id="prev-sem-summary">{{ semantic.summary|default('Sem dados no período.') }}</p>
115|
116| {# Fatores comuns (categorias de provável causa) — pill igual às ocorrências #}
117| {% if semantic.common_factors|default([])|length > 0 %}
118| <div class="d-flex align-items-center flex-wrap mb-3" style="gap:6px;">
119| <span class="ssma-semantic-group-label">Fatores comuns:</span>
120| {% for f in semantic.common_factors %}
121| {% include 'components/ui/_pill.html.twig' with { label: f.label ~ (f.count|default(0) > 0 ? ' (' ~ f.count ~ ')' : ''), color: 'company', size: 'sm' } %}
122| {% endfor %}
123| </div>
124| {% endif %}
125|
126| {# Fatores com alto risco #}
127| {% if semantic.high_risk_factors|default([])|length > 0 %}
128| <div class="d-flex align-items-center flex-wrap mb-3" style="gap:6px;">
129| <span class="ssma-semantic-group-label">Fatores com maior risco:</span>
130| {% for f in semantic.high_risk_factors %}
131| {% include 'components/ui/_pill.html.twig' with { label: f.label ~ (f.count|default(0) > 0 ? ' (' ~ f.count ~ ')' : ''), color: 'red', size: 'sm' } %}
132| {% endfor %}
133| </div>
134| {% endif %}
135|
136| {# Equipes mais associadas #}
137| {% if semantic.teams_associated|default([])|length > 0 %}
138| <div class="d-flex align-items-center flex-wrap mb-3" style="gap:6px;">
139| <span class="ssma-semantic-group-label">Equipes com mais desvios:</span>
140| {% for t in semantic.teams_associated %}
141| {% include 'components/ui/_pill.html.twig' with { label: t.label ~ (t.count|default(0) > 0 ? ' (' ~ t.count ~ ')' : ''), color: 'gray', size: 'sm' } %}
142| {% endfor %}
143| </div>
144| {% endif %}
145|
146| {# Tipos de formulário/evento — equivalente a "Tipos de evento" nas ocorrências #}
147| {% if semantic.type_breakdown|default([])|length > 0 %}
148| <div class="d-flex align-items-center flex-wrap mb-3" style="gap:6px;">
149| <span class="ssma-semantic-group-label">Tipos de formulário:</span>
150| {% for t in semantic.type_breakdown %}
151| {% include 'components/ui/_pill.html.twig' with { label: t.label ~ (t.count|default(0) > 0 ? ' (' ~ t.count ~ ')' : ''), color: 'gray', size: 'sm' } %}
152| {% endfor %}
153| </div>
154| {% endif %}
155|
156| {# Causa sistêmica provável #}
157| {% if semantic.systemic_cause|default('')|trim != '' %}
158| <div class="ssma-semantic-note mb-3">
159| <strong>Causa sistêmica provável:</strong> {{ semantic.systemic_cause }}
160| </div>
161| {% endif %}
162|
163| {# Recomendação de foco #}
164| {% if semantic.focus_recommendation|default('')|trim != '' %}
165| <div class="ssma-semantic-focus mb-2">
166| <i class="fas fa-lightbulb mr-1" style="color:var(--app-brand-primary, var(--company-theme1, #186073));"></i>{{ semantic.focus_recommendation }}
167| </div>
168| {% endif %}
169|
170| {# Temas mais abordados nas abordagens comportamentais #}
171| {% if semantic.temas_comuns|default([])|length > 0 %}
172| <div class="mb-3" id="prev-sem-temas-wrap">
173| <div style="font-size:11px;font-weight:700;color:#344054;margin-bottom:6px;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:.5px;">Temas mais abordados</div>
174| {% for t in semantic.temas_comuns %}
175| <div class="d-flex align-items-center justify-content-between mb-1" style="font-size:12px;">
176| <span style="color:#344054;flex:1;min-width:0;white-space:nowrap;overflow:hidden;text-overflow:ellipsis;" title="{{ t.label }}">{{ t.label }}</span>
177| <div class="d-flex align-items-center" style="gap:6px;flex-shrink:0;">
178| <span style="color:#7A858C;">{{ t.count }}×</span>
179| {% if t.risco_pct > 0 %}
180| <span class="badge" style="background:{{ t.risco_pct >= 30 ? '#FDECEA' : '#FFF7E6' }};color:{{ t.risco_pct >= 30 ? '#E8647A' : '#F59E0B' }};font-size:10px;font-weight:700;padding:2px 6px;border-radius:4px;">{{ t.risco_pct }}% risco</span>
181| {% endif %}
182| </div>
183| </div>
184| {% endfor %}
185| </div>
186| {% endif %}
187|
188| {# Inspeções comuns (mesmo formulário, equipes diferentes) #}
189| {% if semantic.inspecoes_comuns|default([])|length > 0 %}
190| <div class="mb-3" id="prev-sem-comuns-wrap">
191| <div style="font-size:11px;font-weight:700;color:#344054;margin-bottom:6px;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:.5px;">Inspeções comuns (múltiplas equipes)</div>
192| {% for c in semantic.inspecoes_comuns %}
193| <div class="d-flex align-items-center justify-content-between mb-1" style="font-size:12px;">
194| <span style="color:#344054;flex:1;min-width:0;white-space:nowrap;overflow:hidden;text-overflow:ellipsis;" title="{{ c.titulo }}">{{ c.titulo }}</span>
195| <span style="color:#7A858C;flex-shrink:0;">{{ c.gmr_count }} {{ c.gmr_count == 1 ? 'equipe' : 'equipes' }} · {{ c.total }}×</span>
196| </div>
197| {% endfor %}
198| </div>
199| {% endif %}
200|
201| {% if semantic.source_label|default('')|trim != '' %}
202| <div class="ssma-semantic-source" id="prev-sem-source">{{ semantic.source_label }}</div>
203| {% endif %}
204| {% endif %}
205| {% endif %}
206| </div>
207| {% endset %}
208| {% include 'components/ui/_card.html.twig' with {
209| title: 'Análise semântica',
210| tooltip: 'Fatores agregados a partir dos campos estruturados do formulário (tipo de desvio e falha/tipo de barreira) no período filtrado.',
211| content: _semanticContent
212| } %}
213| </div>{# /.p-3 #}
214| </div>{# /.app-card-surface #}
215| </div>{# /.col semantic #}
216|
217| <div class="col-12 col-lg-6 mb-2 mb-lg-0 d-flex">
218| <div class="mhs-card h-100 w-100 ssma-adriana-card">
219| <div class="mhs-card-header d-flex align-items-center justify-content-between flex-wrap" style="gap:10px;">
220| <div class="d-flex align-items-center flex-grow-1" style="gap:10px;min-width:0;">
221| <div class="chat-avatar flex-shrink-0 ssma-adriana-avatar" style="width:32px;height:32px;">
222| <img src="{{ asset('images/ia_images/adriana.png') }}" alt="Adriana" width="32" height="32">
223| </div>
224| <h2 class="mhs-card-title mb-0">
225| Insights da Adriana
226| <button type="button"
227| class="btn p-0 text-muted ml-1 border-0 bg-transparent"
228| data-toggle="tooltip" data-placement="top"
229| title="Insights gerados automaticamente com base nos dados do painel filtrado."
230| aria-label="Informações">
231| <i class="far fa-info-circle" style="font-size:12px;"></i>
232| </button>
233| </h2>
234| </div>
235| {% if ssmaCanPublishCulturalFeed|default(false) %}
236| <button type="button"
237| class="mhs-btn-primary d-flex align-items-center flex-shrink-0 ssma-cultural-feed-post-btn"
238| data-context="{{ _ctx }}"
239| data-question="Quero gerar um post no feed cultural com um resultado positivo do painel.">
240| <i class="fas fa-bullhorn mr-2" aria-hidden="true"></i>
241| <span>Gerar post no feed cultural</span>
242| </button>
243| {% endif %}
244| </div>
245| <div class="mhs-card-body">
246| <div class="ssma-adriana-split">
247| <div class="ssma-adriana-insights-col">
248| {% if _noData and adriana.insights|default([])|length == 0 %}
249| <div class="d-flex flex-column align-items-center justify-content-center text-center py-3" style="gap:8px;min-height:80px;">
250| <span style="font-size:28px;opacity:.4;">💤</span>
251| <p class="mb-0" style="font-size:13px;font-weight:600;color:#1E1E1E;">{{ _emptyTitle }}</p>
252| <p class="mb-0" style="font-size:12px;color:#7A858C;max-width:260px;">{{ _emptyBody }}</p>
253| </div>
254| {% else %}
255| <ol class="ssma-panel-adriana-insights ssma-adriana-insights-list mb-0">
256| {% for insight in adriana.insights|default([]) %}
257| <li>{{ insight|raw }}</li>
258| {% else %}
259| <li style="list-style:none;color:#7A858C;font-size:12px;">{{ _emptyBody }}</li>
260| {% endfor %}
261| </ol>
262| {% endif %}
263| </div>
264| <div class="ssma-adriana-questions-col">
265| <div class="ssma-adriana-questions-title">Perguntas sugeridas</div>
266| {% if _noData and adriana.suggested_questions|default([])|length == 0 %}
267| <p class="mb-0" style="font-size:12px;color:#7A858C;margin-top:8px;">As perguntas aparecerão aqui após o registro de dados no período.</p>
268| {% else %}
269| <div class="suggestions-grid ssma-adriana-questions-grid ssma-panel-adriana">
270| {% for q in adriana.suggested_questions|default([])|slice(0, 3) %}
271| <div class="suggestion-card ssma-adriana-suggest-q" style="cursor:pointer;background:#fff;" title="{{ q }}" data-question="{{ q|e('html_attr') }}" data-context="{{ _ctx }}">
272| <i class="fa-regular fa-sparkles suggestion-card__icon" aria-hidden="true"></i>
273| <span class="suggestion-card__text">{{ q }}</span>
274| </div>
275| {% endfor %}
276| </div>
277| {% endif %}
278| </div>
279| </div>
280| </div>
281| </div>
282| </div>
283|</div>
284|
285|<script>
286|(function () {
287| if (!window.ssmaAskAdrianaPanelQuestion) {
288| window.ssmaAskAdrianaPanelQuestion = function (question, context) {
289| var q = String(question || '').trim();
290| if (!q || window.isAwaitingResponse) return;
291| var ctx = context || 'occurrence';
292| var prefix = ctx === 'prevention'
293| ? '[Painel Prevenção SSMA] '
294| : '[Painel Ocorrências SSMA] ';
295| var fullMessage = prefix + q;
296| if (typeof window.switchChatContext === 'function') {
297| window.switchChatContext('Módulo de Segurança');
298| }
299| window.lastSuggestionId = null;
300| var panelCtx = ctx === 'prevention'
301| ? (typeof window.ssmaGetPreventionPanelChatContext === 'function'
302| ? window.ssmaGetPreventionPanelChatContext()
303| : { domain: 'prevention' })
304| : (typeof window.ssmaGetOccurrencePanelChatContext === 'function'
305| ? window.ssmaGetOccurrencePanelChatContext()
306| : { domain: 'occurrence' });
307| if (/postar melhorias no feed|gerar\s+(um\s+)?post\b.*\b(feed|cultural)|post no feed cultural|resultado positivo do painel/i.test(q)) {
308| panelCtx.feed_improvement = true;
309| } else {
310| delete panelCtx.feed_improvement;
311| }
312| window.ssmaPanelChatContext = panelCtx;
313| var modal = document.getElementById('chatModal');
314| if (typeof window.toggleChatModal === 'function') {
315| if (modal && !modal.classList.contains('open')) {
316| window.toggleChatModal();
317| }
318| }
319| setTimeout(function () {
320| // Reaplica o contexto imediatamente antes do envio — toggleChatModal /
321| // switchChatContext podem limpar window.ssmaPanelChatContext no meio.
322| window.ssmaPanelChatContext = panelCtx;
323| if (typeof window.sendMessage === 'function') {
324| window.sendMessage(fullMessage, q);
325| return;
326| }
327| var input = document.getElementById('chatInput') || window.messageInput;
328| if (input) {
329| input.value = fullMessage;
330| input.focus();
331| }
332| }, 200);
333| };
334| }
335| if (window.__ssmaAdrianaSuggestBound) {
336| return;
337| }
338| window.__ssmaAdrianaSuggestBound = true;
339| document.addEventListener('click', function (ev) {
340| var feedBtn = ev.target && ev.target.closest ? ev.target.closest('.ssma-cultural-feed-post-btn') : null;
341| if (feedBtn && !window.isAwaitingResponse) {
342| ev.preventDefault();
343| var feedQ = feedBtn.getAttribute('data-question')
344| || 'Quero gerar um post no feed cultural com um resultado positivo do painel.';
345| var feedCtx = feedBtn.getAttribute('data-context') || 'occurrence';
346| if (typeof window.ssmaAskAdrianaPanelQuestion === 'function') {
347| window.ssmaAskAdrianaPanelQuestion(feedQ, feedCtx);
348| }
349| return;
350| }
351| var card = ev.target && ev.target.closest ? ev.target.closest('.ssma-adriana-suggest-q') : null;
352| if (!card || window.isAwaitingResponse) return;
353| ev.preventDefault();
354| var q = card.getAttribute('data-question') || card.getAttribute('title') || '';
355| var ctx = card.getAttribute('data-context') || 'occurrence';
356| window.ssmaAskAdrianaPanelQuestion(q, ctx);
357| });
358|})();
359|</script>
360|
Request #26
deepseek-v4-flash
P:114.81K C:4.35K CR:108.8K CW:0
35590ms
Reasoning
The occurrences panel semantic template likewise doesn't have the data-ap-adriana-insights containers (it does have `ssma-panel-adriana-insights` class). The action plan JS looks for `[data-ap-adriana-insights]` which is only on the new partial. And the empty-state condition in occurrences panel is based on `semantic.total_occurrences == 0`, whereas the action plan's empty-state condition is `_no_data` (i.e., both semantic and adriana empty). This action-plan partial may thus render empty state for most default SSR (since semantic summary '' and no factors → empty state), causing the missing-container bug on AJAX update.
Given the occurrences panel apparently handles the transition in a different way? The occurrences JS likely replaces the whole innerHTML of both panels when filtering. Let me check how occurrence panel JS applies filter response: maybe it re-renders entire container including the semantic and adriana blocks (with server-rendered HTML from the AJAX response), not just partial updates. In that case the containers are re-rendered on each filter including empty states.
But in action_plan_panel.js, `applyPendenciasDom` only patches DOM parts and calls renderSemanticAdrianaRow. So the transition bug is specific to this implementation. This is a genuine concern worth reporting as medium.
Actually wait: Since `updateSemanticAdriana` is called on every AJAX response, and contentEl exists, the semantic text updates. Insights/questions only update if their containers exist in SSR. If SSR default state is non-empty (e.g., data present at initial render), containers exist and JS update works. If the user changes filters to empty set, insights fallback message appears. If initial SSR is empty and filter returns data, containers missing → nothing appears except semantic. Since the painel probably always has some data given the module has actions, the SSR state might be non-empty normally. But if a user filters by a team/unit with zero pendências then empty state is rendered on AJAX? Wait — on AJAX, applyPendenciasDom does NOT touch the outer container structure; the outer partial only renders empty state if `_no_data` during initial SSR. The SSR determines the container presence forever because the JS never replaces the whole adriana card markup. So if SSR data empty → containers absent forever → insights/questions never render even when a filter returns data. If SSR data non-empty → containers present forever → even when empty data comes back, containers show fallback message (but at least appear). So inconsistency is one-directional; bug only when SSR empty. Medium/low.
Actually hmm — there's another subtlety: In `applyPendenciasDom` for pendencias view there's also `updateRecommendationBlock` which targets the SSR recommendation text. Fine.
OK. This is a valid finding.
Now, let me look for other real issues. Let me examine the JS more closely around things that could crash:
1. `formatApPeriodDate` uses `apPainelMonths[date.getMonth()]`. Good.
2. `refreshApPanelPeriodLabel` uses `endInput.min = startValue`. Good.
3. `syncApPainelPeriodPresetUI('all_future')` sets end date 5 years ahead. diffDaysInclusive huge but ok.
4. In `buildFilterParams`, when view is pendencias and period param maybe 'pend:range:...' - setting param key 'period' with value containing ':' is fine.
5. `runPanelFilterRequest` view param: buildFilterParams sets view. Backend presumably responds with resp.view to match. applyFilterResponse uses resp.view.
Hmm, wait: applyFilterResponse: `if (resp.view === 'visao_geral') {...} if (resp.view === 'comparativo') {...} mergePanelData(resp.panel); ... applyPendenciasDom(resp.panel); renderPendenciasCharts();`. For 'pendencias' resp.view, fine. But what if backend's resp.view is 'pendencias' exactly? It's not checked; but pendencias path is the fallback for everything else. OK.
But suppose user triggers filter 'pendencias' while on visao_geral view (due to debounce from an older request?). Not likely.
Now, there's an important issue about **CSRF and endpoint contract**. It's GET with filters — CSRF not needed.
OK.
Now let me look at the CSS and templates to ensure they match. Let me note possible design overlap: In `_tab_painel.html.twig`, `.ssma-ap-chart-month-select` selects `.ssma-ap-chart-month-select select` with `appearance:auto`. Fine.
Now, the biggest new finding to report: duplicate chart container IDs between actions tab & painel overview. Let me double check whether `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` (with these charts) will actually co-exist: index includes `_tab_action_plan` inside `tab_plano_acoes_content` unconditionally. Yes. Both in the same page DOM.
Additionally, the new index.html.twig adds the painel tab; even for users where the actions tab content might render with empty state (no actions → charts not present), duplicates occur only when actions exist. The module presumably has data.
Given chart initializers use `$('#id')` selecting first element only and Highcharts re-init on a container that already has a chart throws a JS error ("Chart is already initialized") — actually re-initializing a container that already has a chart in Highcharts triggers console error and aborts the chart creation. Since initSsmaActionPlanCharts is called:
- On actions tab initial load by its inline script (if visible).
- On the painel view's renderOverviewCharts.
Let me look at how initSsmaActionPlanCharts determines which container exists: There's `hasSsmaActionPlanDistributionCharts` used to check presence. Let me read the inline script section in _tab_action_plan near line 620-700 to see if it checks only containers in its own panel? Probably it uses document.getElementById on the four ids, which picks the first container — the actions tab one. Hmm, wait, given _tab_action_plan markup is earlier in the DOM than the painel tab content (actions tab content at top), the first containers belong to the actions tab. So even when painel initSsmaActionPlanCharts is called, charts go to the hidden actions-tab containers (or throw since already initialized), and the visible painel gauges remain empty.
Actually wait: When Painel tab is the active tab, the actions tab content is hidden. Its gauge containers are empty initially? On initial page load with default tab "Plano de Ação" (actions) visible, its inline JS initializes gauges & bar charts in the actions tab containers. Then user switches to Painel→Visão Geral, renderOverviewCharts→initSsmaActionPlanCharts tries to initialize again into the same first containers (which already have charts) → Highcharts error, and the painel's own gauge containers stay empty. This is a real user-visible defect.
But could it be that in the target final branch, they removed charts from the actions tab (per the rule doc)? If the actions tab were refactored to not include those chart containers (they were moved to the painel), the duplicate would not exist. But since the actions tab template is not part of this diff and still includes them, the state after merging this PR contains duplicates. And since the actions tab template is unchanged, the PR should have handled the duplication (e.g., renamed ids in painel). So reporting is valid.
Let me confirm that the actions tab gauges & charts use same ids: yes, `ssma-action-plan-project-gauge`, `ssma-action-plan-resolution-gauge`, `ssma-action-plan-type-bar`, `ssma-action-plan-deadline-bar` plus `ssma-action-plan-project-gauge-card`.
Wait, but is `_actions_bar_chart.html.twig` used in actions tab (lines 276-292) - yes, chart ids `ssma-action-plan-type-bar`, `ssma-action-plan-deadline-bar`.
So it's a real duplicate.
Now let me figure out the line in the review file to attach the comment. The best anchor: `_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig` line 101-106 where gauges are rendered with duplicate ids, and 80-97 for the bar charts. Provide comment referencing both.
I should attach to existing_code from diff. Let me find lines in that file to anchor. Let me read the file region.
From earlier diff we have (in _tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig):
```
+ <div class="col-12 col-lg-6 mb-3 mb-lg-0">
+ {% include 'ssma/partials/_actions_bar_chart.html.twig' with {
+ chart_id: 'ssma-action-plan-type-bar',
```
and later:
```
+ <div id="ssma-action-plan-project-gauge" style="height: 360px; min-height: 360px;">{{ action_plan_empty_chart_state }}</div>
```
I'll anchor the comment at the gauge id line or the include line.
Given confirmed #1 etc. are already set; I should only add new distinct comments. Let me plan new comments:
1. **Duplicate chart container IDs across Ações and Painel tabs** (bug/medium) — file: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig anchor at include chart_id line (or gauge id). Severity high? Impact: charts may initialize in the wrong (hidden) containers or throw; visible panel charts empty; also duplicate ID invalid HTML; tutorial helper getElementById picks wrong node. I'll set severity medium/high. Let me pick "high" because it directly breaks the new UI feature (Visão Geral charts) on pages where the actions tab also renders. Actually only the distribution charts/gauges, not the main charts of visão geral (overview evolution is separate). So medium-high. I'll go with medium.
2. **Dead partial `_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig`** — never included (maintainability/low-medium). Since confirmed #8 is about offcanvas never included (same category), but this is a distinct file and distinct dead partial. I'll report as low/medium maintainability.
3. **Adriana insights/questions containers absent in SSR empty state → AJAX cannot populate later** (bug/medium) — file: JS `renderSemanticAdrianaRow` or the Twig partial. The comment would go to the JS function (in JS file) or to the partial where the container is conditionally rendered. Since the JS only updates existing elements, and template only renders the container when there is data, mismatch. I'll anchor on JS code (added line) in renderSemanticAdrianaRow; content explains.
Wait: maybe the better anchor is in the Twig partial, where conditional render of `data-ap-adriana-insights` only in else branch. Provide comment: "Quando o SSR chega sem dados (estado vazio), os containers `[data-ap-adriana-insights]` e `[data-ap-adriana-questions]` não são renderizados; o JS só atualiza esses containers se existirem...". Anchor: `{% if _no_data and _insights|length == 0 %}` in partial. Or anchor in the JS function since it's the more critical code. I'll pick the JS `renderSemanticAdrianaRow` function (added line), category bug, severity medium.
But wait — is it truly a bug? Consider typical flow: The SSR panel JSON is always populated by backend with the default filters. If default filters return no pendências (e.g., empty period), then content empty → SSR empty state. When user changes filters to data, the JS updates contentEl (semantic) but not insights/questions, and the "empty" placeholder remains. Yes.
But hmm, there is a possibility that on filter change the JS also updates only the contentEl and empty-state fallbacks inside lists remain as `<li>` emptyBody, not ideal but still shows fallback text. For the pendencias view with container present, emptyBody text in list. For overview with empty→ containers absent.
Given that SSR always renders containers when data exists, but zero-data default case common for "next_month" with no pendencias? Probably rarely; still, when the AJAX returns data later the UI stays empty = bug. Report medium/low.
Let me consider whether there are more clear-cut bugs to report. Let me search the CSS and templates for mismatched IDs:
In _tab_painel.html.twig, the filters for overview have ids: ap_overview_filter_team, ap_overview_filter_management, ap_overview_filter_origin, ap_overview_filter_unit; pendencias filters ids: ap_painel_filter_team, ap_painel_filter_vinculo, ap_painel_filter_unidade, ap_painel_filter_origem, ap_painel_filter_mine. JS uses these ids consistent.
Now: `_tab_painel` period popover markup IDs `ap_painel_period_popover`, `ap_painel_period_close`, `ap_painel_period_apply`, `ap_painel_period_trigger`, `ap_painel_start_date`, `ap_painel_end_date`, `ap_painel_period_label`, `ap_painel_period_summary`. JS consistent. Overview: ap_overview_*. Consistent.
One issue: `bindOverviewFilters` document click handler closes popover when click outside '#ap-painel-filters-overview .oc-painel-period-filter'. But the period trigger is inside `.filter-item.oc-painel-period-filter`, and popover inside as sibling. Fine.
Now possible race: custom select change triggers filter; custom select wrapper's own JS may also trigger; duplicate requests? Not sure.
Another potential bug: In `syncPendenciasFilterState`, unidade default 'todas'. But for a non-network-head user there's no unidade element → unidade set '' in sync? Actually syncPendenciasFilterState:
```
var unidadeEl = document.getElementById('ap_painel_filter_unidade');
panelState.unidade = unidadeEl ? (getSelectValue('ap_painel_filter_unidade') || 'todas') : '';
```
Good.
Now pendencias filters origin id: 'ap_painel_filter_origem', but buildFilterParams uses origin for both views; when switching to pendencias, panelState.origin may have been overwritten by overview's syncOverviewFilterState (origin from ap_overview_filter_origin). If user set origin in overview then switched to pendencias and changed another pendencias filter (not origin), syncPendenciasFilterState will read the pendencias origin select (default empty) and overwrite panelState.origin=''. That means origin filter in overview could be lost after interacting with pendencias — then switching back to overview would fetch without origin? Let's trace:
- User in overview sets origin = 'ros' → syncOverviewFilterState sets panelState.origin='ros'; filter fetch overview with origin.
- User switches to pendencias: switchView('pendencias') doesn't fetch (SSR). panelState.origin still 'ros' but not used in pendencias rendering; pendencias filter select origin shows default empty; if user changes team filter → syncPendenciasFilterState sets panelState.origin = '' (reads pendencias origin select empty).
- User switches to overview: pill → syncOverviewFilterState reads overview origin select still 'ros' → panelState.origin = 'ros'; triggers overview fetch with origin. So origin preserved in the overview select. OK because it's read from the actual select, not shared stale var. Because both sync functions overwrite the origin from the respective view's select. So fine.
However, `panelState.unidade` shared between views; syncPendenciasFilterState reads pendencias unit select (maybe 'todas'), overview reads overview unit select. They're separate selects with separate SSR states. sync per view. Fine.
But buildFilterParams for comparativo uses panelState.team/unidade set last by whichever view sync ran. When switching to comparativo via pill click → switchView('comparativo') → triggerPanelFilter('comparativo'); but no sync for comparativo; it uses whatever panelState from previous view. Might be intended: comparativo should use unidade etc. from active filters? Possibly intended to pass unit filters. Not clear.
OK.
Now check CSS duplicate: `.ssma-ap-chart-month-select select, #ssma-ap-chart-axis-filter` inline in _tab_painel. Fine.
Let me examine the top of the JS to see global functions declared:
- `window.ssmaApPanelSetPeriod` global assigned inside DOMContentLoaded. Wait — it assigns inside DOMContentLoaded: `window.ssmaApPanelSetPeriod = function (value) { applyApPainelPeriodPreset(...) }`. If called before DOMContentLoaded, undefined. Probably fine.
- `window.ssmaAskAdrianaPanelQuestion` assigned in bindAdrianaQuestions() but guarded if not defined.
Note: bindAdrianaQuestions sets global `window.__ssmaApAdrianaSuggestBound` flag; but the occurrences panel has its own `window.__ssmaAdrianaSuggestBound` flag (without 'Ap'). If both panels are on the same page? Are they on same page? Occurrences panel is on occurrence module page; the action plan painel is on plano acao page. Different pages. But there's also possibility the same page includes both occurrence panel and action plan? No.
But note: the action plan index page (this page) has the actions tab and painel tab. And possibly other modules with semantic adriana row? Not likely same page.
Let's double check if the actions tab page includes the "occurrence panel" with Adriana? No.
OK.
Now, let me double check the duplicate chart-id claim by reading the exact _tab_action_plan portion again: the charts are inside `#ssma-action-plan-main-row` with project-gauge and resolution-gauge (col-xl-4). And bar charts in the row after. Yes (lines 244-293).
Wait but if the action plan tab shows these charts (both the full-height gauges and bar charts), and the painel's visao_geral duplicates them, then this PR's code added them to the painel while they still exist in the actions tab. The rule doc (target) says they should be on painel and NOT duplicated in actions — presumably future removal planned. But in the meantime this branch duplicates IDs. Even if actions tab removal is planned later in the same feature branch, the current diff includes the painel versions; when both are on the same page, duplicates. Since this review's job: ensure the PR works. Since actions tab removal not part of diff, we should flag.
Actually, wait, maybe the plan is for painel visao_geral distribution charts/gauges to remain in painel, while actions tab keeps them too — is that plausible? Both would be rendered from `action_plan_data` and are identical; duplicate renders waste and double ids break. It must be a bug or leftover. I'll report as a cross-file issue.
Now, note in renderOverviewCharts, initDistributionCharts calls `window.initSsmaActionPlanCharts()`. The definition in _tab_action_plan inline script likely targets containers by id using `getSsmaActionPlanChartContainers`? Let me read that inline script portion (lines ~620-960) to know exactly how it picks containers and guards. Let me read lines 600-720 and 930-970.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_action_plan.html.twig", "start_line": 600, "end_line": 730}
Result
File: templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_action_plan.html.twig (Total lines: 1909)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 600-730
600| borderWidth: 0,
601| borderColor: 'transparent',
602| startAngle: 0,
603| endAngle: 360,
604| center: ['50%', '50%'],
605| size: '88%',
606| innerSize: '68%',
607| states: {
608| inactive: { opacity: 1 },
609| hover: { enabled: false }
610| }
611| }
612| },
613| series: [{
614| animation: false,
615| data: gaugeData
616| }]
617| });
618| }
619|
620| function buildSsmaActionPlanCharts() {
621| var hasActionChartData = Number((ssmaActionPlanState.kpis && ssmaActionPlanState.kpis.total_actions) || (ssmaActionPlanState.actions || []).length || 0) > 0;
622| var brandColors = getSsmaActionPlanBrandColors();
623|
624| ssmaActionPlanChartState.projectGauge = renderSsmaActionPlanGauge(
625| 'ssma-action-plan-project-gauge',
626| ssmaActionPlanGauges.with_project_rate || 0,
627| { x1: 0, y1: 0, x2: 0, y2: 1, stops: [[0, brandColors.dark], [1, brandColors.base]] },
628| hasActionChartData
629| );
630|
631| ssmaActionPlanChartState.resolutionGauge = renderSsmaActionPlanResolutionGauge(
632| 'ssma-action-plan-resolution-gauge',
633| ssmaActionPlanGauges.resolution_rate || 0,
634| [
635| [0, '#EA151C'],
636| [0.5, '#FFC107'],
637| [1, '#25AD52']
638| ],
639| hasActionChartData
640| );
641|
642| ssmaActionPlanChartState.typeBar = window.renderSsmaActionsBarChart(
643| 'ssma-action-plan-type-bar',
644| ssmaActionPlanTypeSeries,
645| {
646| defaultColor: brandColors.dark
647| }
648| );
649|
650| ssmaActionPlanChartState.deadlineBar = window.renderSsmaActionsBarChart(
651| 'ssma-action-plan-deadline-bar',
652| ssmaActionPlanCharts.actions_on_schedule || [],
653| {
654| defaultColor: '#186073'
655| }
656| );
657| }
658|
659| function reflowSsmaActionPlanCharts() {
660| $.each(ssmaActionPlanChartState, function (_, chartInstance) {
661| if (chartInstance && typeof chartInstance.reflow === 'function') {
662| chartInstance.reflow();
663| }
664| });
665| }
666|
667| function initSsmaActionPlanCharts() {
668| waitForSsmaActionPlanHighcharts(function () {
669| if (!ssmaActionPlanChartState.initialized) {
670| buildSsmaActionPlanCharts();
671| ssmaActionPlanChartState.initialized = true;
672| }
673|
674| reflowSsmaActionPlanCharts();
675| });
676| }
677|
678| function syncSsmaActionPlanSeriesFromState() {
679| ssmaActionPlanGauges = $.extend({}, ssmaActionPlanState.gauges || {});
680| ssmaActionPlanTypeSeries = $.map(ssmaActionPlanState.barCharts && ssmaActionPlanState.barCharts.types ? ssmaActionPlanState.barCharts.types : [], function (item) {
681| return $.extend({}, item);
682| });
683| ssmaActionPlanCharts = $.extend(true, {}, ssmaActionPlanState.charts || {});
684| }
685|
686| function destroySsmaActionPlanCharts() {
687| ['projectGauge', 'typeBar', 'deadlineBar'].forEach(function (key) {
688| var chartInstance = ssmaActionPlanChartState[key];
689|
690| if (chartInstance && typeof chartInstance.destroy === 'function') {
691| chartInstance.destroy();
692| }
693|
694| ssmaActionPlanChartState[key] = null;
695| });
696|
697| ssmaActionPlanChartState.resolutionGauge = null;
698| $('#ssma-action-plan-project-gauge, #ssma-action-plan-resolution-gauge, #ssma-action-plan-type-bar, #ssma-action-plan-deadline-bar').html(ssmaActionPlanChartEmptyStateHtml);
699| ssmaActionPlanChartState.initialized = false;
700| }
701|
702| function refreshSsmaActionPlanCharts() {
703| syncSsmaActionPlanSeriesFromState();
704|
705| waitForSsmaActionPlanHighcharts(function () {
706| destroySsmaActionPlanCharts();
707| buildSsmaActionPlanCharts();
708| ssmaActionPlanChartState.initialized = true;
709| reflowSsmaActionPlanCharts();
710| });
711| }
712|
713| function renderSsmaActionPlanKpis() {
714| var kpis = ssmaActionPlanState.kpis || {};
715| var titleMap = {
716| open_actions: 'Ações abertas',
717| resolved_actions: 'Ações resolvidas',
718| without_project: 'Sem projetos',
719| total_actions: 'Total de ações'
720| };
721|
722| $('.js-ssma-action-plan-kpi-card').each(function () {
723| var $card = $(this);
724| var key = $card.data('kpiKey');
725| var value = Number(kpis[key] || 0);
726|
727| $card.find('.mhs-card-title').text(titleMap[key] || '');
728|
729| if ($card.find('.mhs-card-value').length) {
730| $card.find('.mhs-card-value').text(value);
Request #27
deepseek-v4-flash
P:120.61K C:9.2K CR:119.04K CW:0
67527ms
Reasoning
Very important: `buildSsmaActionPlanCharts` calls `renderSsmaActionPlanGauge('ssma-action-plan-project-gauge', ...)` etc. These use getElementById with the id; they will pick the first matching element (the one in the Ações tab if it precedes the painel content). Also `destroySsmaActionPlanCharts` uses `$('#ssma-action-plan-project-gauge, ...').html(...)` — first match only for each.
So duplicates cause chart initializations to target the first containers (Ações tab), and `renderSsmaActionPlanGauge` likely appends a Highcharts to it. Also gauge render in painel visao_geral would then be invisible.
But wait — how does `renderSsmaActionPlanGauge` decide to target the gauge container? If the function uses `document.getElementById(containerId)` and the actions tab content is earlier in the DOM, charts are placed in the hidden actions tab containers. This confirms the cross-tab duplication problem.
However — is the actions tab content `tab_plano_acoes_content` earlier in the DOM than `tab_plano_painel_content`? Yes, index.html.twig: action plan tab content first (display:block), painel after. So the first matching containers are the actions tab ones. This means whenever `initSsmaActionPlanCharts` or `refreshSsmaActionPlanCharts` runs (including from the painel's `renderOverviewCharts` / `ensureDistributionChartsForExport`), the charts target the hidden Ações containers, and the painel's own gauge/bar containers stay empty. Unless the Ações tab is removed from DOM. This is a strong finding.
Actually wait — I should double check whether `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` might be refactored to NOT include those charts on the final branch (the doc's rule about moving charts to Painel says "Não recolocar charts na aba Ações sem alinhamento"). Perhaps on the branch, the Ações tab's charts were already removed in a commit not in this PR? But we read the file in the current state (this branch), which includes them at lines 244-293. Since `file_read` reads current version, they're still there. So yes.
Also important: within the painel page itself, does it matter? Actually the painel visao_geral distribution charts rely on initSsmaActionPlanCharts building charts into `#ssma-action-plan-project-gauge` which is duplicated in the actions tab as well. The Ações tab appears in the same page as the painel. So the duplication is confirmed across the two tabs.
Now, how could this ever work in product? Maybe the actions tab content on this page is different: if the actions tab is present only when there are actions (action_plan_actions empty → empty state with no charts). When there are actions, both render duplicates. Common.
I'm fairly confident about this finding. Let me also note that the CSS file added sets gauge height for `#ssma-action-plan-project-gauge` and `#ssma-action-plan-resolution-gauge` inside `#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root` — but with duplicate ids the CSS `#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root #ssma-action-plan-project-gauge` only targets those inside the root (the painel), so CSS is scoped. But JS getElementById isn't scoped. Highcharts gauge rendering not scoped.
OK.
Now let me examine a couple more potential issues: the `renderSsmaActionsBarChart` is called for chart ids in the actions tab — also duplicated in painel visao_geral via `_actions_bar_chart.html.twig` with `auto_init:false`. In visao_geral they rely on panel JS initDistributionCharts to initialize. Duplicate issue.
Let me now also verify the `_actions_bar_chart.html.twig` partial `auto_init:false` doesn't self-initialize. Since auto_init false, it's manual init by JS.
Next let me look for any other notable mismatch issues in the new files.
Let me read through a few segments of the JS code that I haven't seen completely (lines 1-600), to catch glaring bugs (e.g., undefined vars, wrong property names, mismatched element ids between JS and Twig templates). Already read most through the diff. Let me systematically compare element ids:
JS getElementById/querySelector usage ids:
- 'ssma-ap-panel-config-json' ✓ in template
- 'ssma-ap-panel-data-json' ✓
- 'ap_painel_start_date', 'ap_painel_end_date', 'ap_painel_period_label', 'ap_painel_period_summary' ✓
- '#ap_painel_controls .ap-painel-period-preset' ✓
- 'ap_overview_start_date', 'ap_overview_end_date', 'ap_overview_period_label', 'ap_overview_period_summary' ✓ (in overview popover)
- '#ap-painel-filters-overview .ap-overview-period-preset' ✓
- 'ssma-ap-kpi-row' ✓
- 'ssma-ap-overview-kpi-row' ✓
- 'ssma-ap-chart-axis-filter' ✓
- 'ap_painel_filter_team/vinculo/unidade/origem/mine' ✓
- 'ap_overview_filter_team/management/origin/unit' ✓
- 'ssma-ap-panel-table' ✓
- 'ssma-ap-overview-table' ✓
- 'ssma-ap-overview-pagination' etc. ✓
- 'ssma-ap-comparativo-root' ✓
- 'ap_painel_export_charts_btn' ✓
- 'ssmaApPanelViewPills' ✓ (not used in JS? pills via root.querySelectorAll)
- sections `[data-ap-panel-view]` ✓
- 'ssma-ap-chart-critical' ✓
- 'ssma-ap-chart-top-responsible' ✓
- 'ssma-ap-chart-origin' ✓
- 'ssma-ap-chart-overview-evolution' ✓
- 'ssma-ap-chart-overview-origin-time' ✓
- 'ssma-ap-chart-overview-person-time' ✓
- 'ssma-action-plan-type-bar' — duplicated in Ações tab
- 'ssma-action-plan-deadline-bar' — duplicated
- 'ssma-action-plan-project-gauge' / 'ssma-action-plan-resolution-gauge' — duplicated
Wait, the panel's visao_geral doesn't render the distribution charts & gauges in the pendencias view. But the visao_geral markup is in DOM hidden for pendencias default.
Now, if the actions tab page doesn't show? Wait, on the SSMA Plano de Ação page, the painel tab and Ações tab are mutually exclusive visually but both in DOM.
There is one more twist: this action plan painel is also possibly a standalone route `/manager/ssma/plano-acao/painel` (per doc) that renders index with active tab = painel? If the page uses the same index template, the Ações tab content still renders (all tab contents are in DOM). So duplicates persist.
OK. Let me finalize new comments:
**New comment 1**: duplicate chart containers IDs — anchor on _tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig lines with `_actions_bar_chart` include (type bar) and/or gauge div. Choose the code line:
```
+ <div id="ssma-action-plan-project-gauge" style="height: 360px; min-height: 360px;">{{ action_plan_empty_chart_state }}</div>
```
This appears in the diff. Good anchor. Include mention of bar charts too.
Severity: high? Let me classify as medium (functional layout issue but not data loss). I'll choose "medium" or "high". Since it can break both the Ações charts and the Painel gauges, and cause console errors, "high" is reasonable but could be argued. Let's pick "high"? Actually given it's the new feature's own charts that may fail and duplicated IDs is objectively broken HTML and chart init conflict, I'll use severity "high"? Hmm careful about overclaiming; The first container (Ações tab) may be hidden but charts initialize there; the painel gauges would remain empty, so new feature partially broken. I'll say "medium".
**New comment 2**: dead partial `_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig`. Severity low (maintainability).
**New comment 3**: SSR empty state missing containers bug in renderSemanticAdrianaRow. Severity medium? Actually if the default SSR is empty but the painel has a fetch triggered when labels empty (e.g., no data for period) then data later returns insights not shown. I'd give "low/medium". Let's mark as medium since it leaves the panel stuck in empty state after filtering to a subset with data.
Hmm wait: Actually, consider a more common scenario: SSR has data → containers exist. Then user filters to a subset with data → works. Filter to empty → fallback message present (list still there). So only initial-empty case is broken. In a production environment where module has at least some actions, the initial state won't be empty usually. So lower priority — "low".
But also for 'visao_geral' overview filter (e.g., date range presets default last_3_months; if no actions created in last 3 months, SSR overview semantic empty) — likely possible. Then data appear after change period. Low/medium.
**Potential new comment 4**: The `buildSemanticPillGroup` and other JS-generated markup rely on CSS classes `.ssma-semantic-group-label` & `.ssma-semantic-summary` etc from the occurrences panel CSS which is included. But `updateOperationalSummary` includes rows with inline style using `escapeHtml(row.percent)` for width, maybe NaN/100; not big.
**Potential new comment 5**: In `updateKpiRow`, when rendering new cards from AJAX (if cards length 0) they use `buildKpiCardHtml` with col classes col-md-6 col-xl-3; but pendencias SSR row contains the full col wrappers, so cards.length>0 path used. Fine.
**Potential new comment 6**: `mergePanelData` overwrites top-level keys (e.g., panel.overview merged), fine.
Let me now examine the CSS file for issues like `@container` unsupported, duplicates maybe repeated content. Confirmed #1 partly. I'll not add CSS comments.
Let me look at templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig for `{{ insight|raw }}` (confirmed). Any other raw? `_summary` etc escaped. Questions escaped.
Potential issue in the same partial: `title="{{ q }}"` fine; but the `data-question` duplicates `q` may be large; ok.
Now `_action_plan_semantic_adriana` partial references CSS class `.ssma-semantic-group-label` and `.ssma-semantic-focus`, `.ssma-adriana-split` etc. which are in the occurrences panel styles included in _tab_painel (from `_panel_semantic_adriana_styles.html.twig`). Also in action_plan_panel.css there are only some `.ssma-ap-semantic-*` classes. But wait: confirmed #1 says the `.ssma-ap-overview-semantic-*` CSS rules in action_plan_panel.css don't match markup — those should have been `.ssma-semantic-*` classes. But those classes are provided by occurrences styles; okay.
Now there's another mismatch: the visao_geral semantic partial content uses `.ssma-semantic-focus` etc; but JS `buildOverviewSemanticHtml` outputs `'<div class="ssma-semantic-focus mb-2">...'` consistent.
OK.
Let me also spot check the CSS file for whether it references classes in markup of the templates that exist; big file with many `.ssma-ap-overview-semantic-*` rules (dead) already flagged.
Now, also examine the `_tab_painel.html.twig` view pills & export button. There is an export button id `ap_painel_export_charts_btn` with class js-...; `bindExportChartsButton` binds click. Fine.
Wait, something subtle: In `_tab_painel.html.twig`, there are two `<div class="filters-container tab-filters ... d-none{% if ... %} d-lg-flex{% endif %}" id=...>`. The export-wrap plus two filter rows inside `#ap_painel_controls`. Then `.ssma-ap-panel-filters-row` CSS. toggleHeaderFilters toggles d-none and d-lg-flex for rows using setApPanelFilterRowVisible:
```
function setApPanelFilterRowVisible(el, visible) {
if (!el) return;
el.classList.add('d-none');
if (visible) { el.classList.add('d-lg-flex'); } else { el.classList.remove('d-lg-flex'); }
}
```
Wait: if the element initially has class 'd-lg-flex' (because default_view == pendencias), and the actual view when page loads is pendencias (default). On switching away, add d-none and remove d-lg-flex. On switching back: remove d-none, add d-lg-flex. OK.
But what about mobile? Since d-lg-flex only displays at large. In mobile view, filters hidden? The filter rows probably only desktop. Mobile uses fab? Not relevant.
Now — is there a **double instance of period popovers** triggered with two documents `click` handlers both closing? The pendencias one checks `#ap_painel_controls .oc-painel-period-filter`, overview checks `#ap-painel-filters-overview`. OK.
Next, potential bug: The painel's pendencias filters only visible in large viewport; the two rows overlap ids? no.
Now check the `applyApPanelPeriodPreset` path and axis change triggers. Suppose user in pendencias changes the axis select: change handler syncs & fetches. Then `applyPendenciasDom` calls `updateAxisFilterOptions` resetting select from backend response. fine.
Next potential bug: In `syncApPainelPeriodPresetUI` 'week' preset sets end date +7 days inclusive. The label shows 8 days? diffDaysInclusive counts inclusive; for week start=today end=+7 => 8 days inclusive ("de X à Y"). Minor semantics; not important.
Another potential bug: period presets next_month end.setDate(end.getDate()+30) - maybe 31 days. Fine.
Let me also check the `apOverviewEndDate` computed for `last_week`: start is monday; end = today. If today is Sunday, weekday=0, mondayOffset=6, start set -6 days, end today. That spans Monday-Sunday 7 days but "last_week" might intend previous full week? Eh.
Also for 'last_month', start.setDate(1); end = today — meaning period from start of month to today (not entire last month). The label says 'Mês atual' in fallback preset (last_month text "Mês atual"). So fine.
I think we have enough new findings.
Let me also verify one more potential real bug in `renderOriginChart` data labels `this.point.percentage != null`. Non-strict equality `!=` used: It compares `!= null` which also matches undefined → then it tries `.toFixed` on undefined? Actually `this.point.percentage != null` false for undefined (undefined != null is false), so returns '0'. Wait `undefined != null` → false. null != null → false. So if percentage missing, show 0? Actually if percentage undefined → false → else? The formatter returns '0' for value? No the formatter:
```
formatter: function () {
var pct = this.point.percentage != null ? this.point.percentage.toFixed(1).replace('.', ',') : '0';
return this.y + ' (' + pct + '%)';
}
```
If percentage undefined, pct '0'. OK shows "5 (0%)"? Possibly misleading but shows correct y. Not important.
Now there is also `chartData.labels` when labels present but validation/execution arrays empty → renders chart with zeros. fine.
Now, the CSS `@media (max-width: 767.98px)` includes padding rules referencing `#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root.ssma-action-plan-painel`— template root has both classes. fine.
Given the confirmed findings already cover dead CSS and missing offcanvas, I'll focus the new comments.
Let me double-check the claim about duplicate gauge ids one more time: maybe the painel visao_geral isn't included when action tab content present because the painel tab content is in index.html.twig. Yes it's included unconditionally. Confirmed by index diff: `<div id="tab_plano_painel_content" class="tab-panel" style="display:none;"> {% include 'ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel.html.twig' %}`. So painel markup including visao_geral distribution charts is always rendered.
And `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` also rendered unconditionally inside `tab_plano_acoes_content`. So both present.
Yes.
Let me attach this comment to the file `_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig` at the gauge line.
Now find anchor code that is newly added. The diff for _tab_painel_visao_geral:
```
+ <div class="row mb-3" id="ssma-action-plan-gauges-row">
+ <div class="col-12 col-lg-6 mb-3 mb-lg-0">
+ <div class="app-card-surface h-100" id="ssma-action-plan-project-gauge-card">
...
+ <div id="ssma-action-plan-project-gauge" style="height: 360px; min-height: 360px;">{{ action_plan_empty_chart_state }}</div>
```
Good.
Anchor for bar chart include:
```
+ {% include 'ssma/partials/_actions_bar_chart.html.twig' with {
+ chart_id: 'ssma-action-plan-type-bar',
```
I'll anchor on gauge line with mention of all four ids.
Second comment: dead partial file `_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig`, anchor the top line of the new file: `{% set executor_id = (action_item.responsible_ids|default([]))[0]|default(0) %}`.
Third comment: JS renderSemanticAdrianaRow; anchor:
```
+ var insightsEl = row.querySelector('[data-ap-adriana-insights]');
```
Actually that is a good anchor. Comment: when SSR empty-state, containers don't exist, so updates silently skip. Suggest always render containers and fill fallback text inside them (like the else branch), or rebuild the whole block on update.
But note the JS is inside function with that exact added code. Good.
Now, is there any other "real" bug worth adding? Let me examine possibility of duplication in CSS `@media (max-width: 575.98px)` braces: counts? I'll not.
Let me also verify one more potential serious issue: In `switchView`, when view is 'comparativo', and later user switches to 'pendencias', pendencias charts re-render from `panelData` but pendencias DOM content might not reflect current filters? Since filters persisted; but comparativo fetch only fetched comparativo data. panelData pendencias remains from last fetch/SSR. On re-render charts from stale data possibly mismatch with the visible select filters. But the pendencias section SSR content was updated when filters applied earlier. If no filter change since, ok.
One more subtle: When user is on pendencias and applies filters → applyPendenciasDom updates DOM; then switch to overview triggers filter; then switch back to pendencias switchView triggers renderPendenciasCharts() — which renders charts from panelData.charts that reflect pendencias (unchanged). Fine.
Alright.
Also I want to confirm the claim in comment 3 with direct quote of the code, to be accurate.
Let me check that the partial does not also have data-ap-semantic-content only. Yes.
Now let's also verify maybe there is an existing global helper `window.ssmaAskAdrianaPanelQuestion` used by both occurrences panel and action plan panel with different prefixes. On the action plan page, the occurrences module's partial is not present (it's a different page), so fine.
Now — The offcanvas file never included (confirmed) plus dead icons partial: both new files are dead, but they may be intended for the actions tab elsewhere? Search for include paths didn't find usage; so dead.
However, maybe the dead partials were intended to be included in templates not part of this PR but in the same feature branch that will come. Regardless, they're dead in this merge.
Wait: is it possible `_action_plan_responsible_icons` is used inside `_action_plan_table.html.twig` or `_tab_action_plan` via a different name (like a dynamic include)? Search found nothing. So dead.
Let me write the comments now.
Additionally, let me consider reporting the SSR JSON `panel|json_encode|raw` confirmed #10; not repeating.
One more possibility: `index.html.twig` added inline `<style>` referencing `:has(.app-tabs-bar)`. If the browser doesn't support `:has` (older Safari <15.4, Chrome<105), those CSS rules are ignored — fine progressive. Not an issue.
Now also examine whether index.html.twig change: They moved the painel tab include; previously the painel tab didn't exist; default tab handling; fine.
Potential issue: For users that cannot manage config/perms, but query param `?tab=tab_plano_config` deep-link: component resolveDeepLinkTabId tries `tabsContainer.querySelector('#tab_plano_config_tab')` returns null → fallback to `.active` link (the SSR active link is defaultPlanoTab = tab_plano_acoes). Fine.
Now — maybe the biggest other issue: When `ssmaCanManageConfig` false etc., they add painel tab always. For viewers with no occurrence data? Painel presumably accessible to all with access to module. Fine.
I'll finalize with 3 new comments plus maybe one more about the CSS `.ssma-ap-panel-table-action-btn` etc.
Wait, also I should review whether the JS's `updateRecommendationBlock` actually matches SSR markup: In SSR the recommendation markup:
```
<div class="ssma-ap-recommendation-header">
<div class="chat-avatar...">...</div>
<div class="ssma-ap-semantic-title mb-0">...</div>
</div>
<p class="ssma-ap-semantic-summary mb-0">...</p>
```
And JS selector: `.ssma-ap-recommendation-header + .ssma-ap-semantic-summary`. The p is the direct next sibling. Yes matches.
Alright, let me double check one more potential runtime crash: `updateAxisFilterOptions` uses `chartData.axes` array; each axis item maybe has `selected`? In template, axis objects use `axis.selected|default(false)`. OK.
Now, let me confirm the anchor for the empty-state bug within the JS file with the exact added code text. From the diff:
```
+ var contentEl = row.querySelector('[data-ap-semantic-content]');
+ var insightsEl = row.querySelector('[data-ap-adriana-insights]');
+ var questionsEl = row.querySelector('[data-ap-adriana-questions]');
```
I'll anchor at these three lines.
Now the comment: "Quando o HTML inicial chega sem dados de análise (estado vazio do SSR), os contêineres `[data-ap-adriana-insights]` e `[data-ap-adriana-questions]` não existem no DOM — o template só os renderiza no branch com dados. Depois, quando um filtro retorna conteúdo, esta função apenas preenche o texto semântico (`contentEl`) e não tem onde colocar os insights/perguntas, deixando o card da Adriana preso no estado vazio. Sugiro sempre renderizar os contêineres (com texto de fallback dentro) ou reconstruir o bloco inteiro a cada resposta, para a transição vazio→com dados funcionar."
Good.
Let me double check the exact Twig conditional for pendencias view to be certain the containers absent in `_no_data`. In partial:
```
{% if _no_data and _insights|length == 0 %}
... empty block ... no data-ap-adriana-insights
{% else %}
<ol class="..." data-ap-adriana-insights>
```
Yes. `_no_data` true when _has_semantic false and _has_adriana false; note the else branch is taken if `_has_adriana` true (insights/questions non-empty). If SSR `semantic.summary` non-empty (has semantic), _has_semantic true → not no_data → containers present. Good.
Edge: if semantic non-empty but adriana empty, else branch executed for insights ol with fallback li. fine.
Now, the third comment: duplicate ids. Let me also confirm that the Ações tab is always included in same page even when the actions tab isn't default? Yes, content rendered with display block/none toggling. Both present in DOM always.
OK.
I might also add a comment about the dead offcanvas? That's confirmed #8. skip.
Also might add the `.ssma-ap-ia-shell` CSS and such dead? confirmed #1 partly. skip.
Let me also quickly check the `_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig` style block inside template contains duplicated offcanvas CSS; since it's a partial that would be included once. skip.
Now let me reconsider if comment 3 (transition bug) is maybe wrong because `applyFilterResponse` for pendencias may actually cause the whole DOM to be replaced by the SSR data? No—only patches.
Alright. Let me confirm the exact line numbers to anchor for the two template comments, to be safe using existing_code matches from the diff.
For `_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig`, from diff:
```
+ <div class="row mb-3" id="ssma-action-plan-gauges-row">
+ <div class="col-12 col-lg-6 mb-3 mb-lg-0">
+ <div class="app-card-surface h-100" id="ssma-action-plan-project-gauge-card">
+ <div class="d-flex align-items-center justify-content-between px-3 py-2 border-bottom">
+ <div class="ssma-action-plan-chart-title">Taxa de planos de ação com projetos</div>
+ </div>
+ <div class="p-3">
+ <div id="ssma-action-plan-project-gauge" style="height: 360px; min-height: 360px;">{{ action_plan_empty_chart_state }}</div>
```
Good anchor line for gauges: `<div id="ssma-action-plan-project-gauge" ...`.
The comment will mention distribution bar charts as well (`ssma-action-plan-type-bar`/`ssma-action-plan-deadline-bar`), pointing to same issue, but anchor to this gauge line.
For the dead partial `_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig`, anchor:
```
+{% set executor_id = (action_item.responsible_ids|default([]))[0]|default(0) %}
```
For JS empty-state comment, anchor:
```
+ var contentEl = row.querySelector('[data-ap-semantic-content]');
+ var insightsEl = row.querySelector('[data-ap-adriana-insights]');
+ var questionsEl = row.querySelector('[data-ap-adriana-questions]');
```
Should I also mention in the JS file the dead `_action_plan_view_offcanvas`/`resetCustomSelect`? Confirmed already. skip.
Now let me think about the severity for duplicate chart ids: I'd rate "high" because it can directly break the new charts in Visão Geral (the core of this PR) whenever there are actions registered (common). But is it possible that Ações tab and painel are rendered on separate pages? Actually wait — maybe the action plan page after this PR shows both tabs; the painel's Visão Geral duplicates. But consider also: does `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` (actions tab) render only when action_plan_actions length > 0 (charts inside else). With data present, yes duplicate.
Highcharts double init: On painel view open (visao_geral), renderOverviewCharts → initDistributionCharts → `window.initSsmaActionPlanCharts()` — but this function checks `ssmaActionPlanChartState.initialized` and only builds once. Since the actions tab inline script at DOMContentLoaded already built the charts (if actions tab visible or even hidden?) Actually the action plan inline script at lines ~930-960 runs when document ready; initSsmaActionPlanCharts is called if actions exist regardless of tab visibility. Since its container set targets the first (actions tab) gauges. When painel later calls initSsmaActionPlanCharts, initialized is true, so it just reflows (no double render). So the charts exist in the Ações tab hidden containers, NOT in painel containers → painel gauges/bar charts remain empty on Visão Geral.
Yes — the visible painel containers display only the SSR `action_plan_empty_chart_state` placeholder. So the "Taxa de planos de ação com projetos" and "Taxa de aceitação" gauges + two distribution bar charts in the painel would never render, while hidden duplicates get charts. That is a strong user-facing bug for the Visão Geral tab. Great — high severity.
Wait, but the `refreshSsmaActionPlanCharts` / `ensureDistributionChartsForExport` check resolutionEl has `.highcharts-container`: It targets the painel's gauge element `ssma-action-plan-resolution-gauge` via `document.getElementById`, which returns the FIRST in DOM = the Ações tab gauge container (which HAS .highcharts-container because charts built there). So needsRefresh false → returns quickly, reflow on actions-tab charts only. So export would capture the actions tab hidden charts anyway? They call captureElement on `section.containerId` which again resolves to the actions-tab containers (first). So export might capture hidden charts via html2canvas — maybe actually capture correct image? html2canvas on a hidden element (display:none via parent) returns null. Parent actions tab is display:none when painel active. So export would fail to capture. More evidence of the bug.
Wait, but this is only when both tabs on same page with the actions content present. If the actions content is empty (no action plans) then only painel containers exist and it works. Given typical data, bug present.
I'll rate "high".
Let me now also reconsider whether the Ações tab charts are indeed earlier: In DOM, tab_plano_acoes_content (first) then tab_plano_painel_content. Yes.
Should I also note that this might be a deliberate temporary duplicate pending removal of charts from Ações (per internal doc)? The comment should mention to align with the intended layout (move them out of Ações) or rename ids in the painel, to avoid two renderers sharing ids.
Now also, let me check that gauge ids could conflict because action_plan.css `.ssma-ap-chart-...` uses unique ids. OK.
Now finalize comment list.
Let me finalize the four comments:
1. templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig — duplicate chart/gauge IDs (cross-file with _tab_action_plan) — category bug, severity high.
2. templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig — never included, dead code — category maintainability, severity low.
3. public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js — SSR empty state containers missing → insights/questions never populate after AJAX — category bug, severity low/medium. Choose medium.
Wait, I realize for comment 3 I need to make sure the anchor code lines are uniquely in diff. Yes they are added lines.
Let me also think whether I should raise about `panel.view_sections` vs pills & currentView default to 'comparativo' — Since CSS + JS + template handle comparativo. Not a bug.
One more potential new bug to confirm: In `_tab_painel.html.twig`, the SSR pendencias table cells have action button only with `data-action-id`, not all the other data attributes like title/description that `buildPendenciasTableRowHtml` produces (JS uses many data-action-* attributes to fill offcanvas). That means even the JS-created rows populate offcanvas properly but the offcanvas doesn't exist (confirmed #2). But note that SSR rows (from initial load) include only `data-action-id`, `title`, etc.? Let's check SSR action_cell:
```
{% set action_cell %}
<button type="button"
class="ssma-ap-panel-table-action-btn js-ssma-ap-panel-view-action"
data-action-id="{{ row.id }}"
data-toggle="tooltip"
title="Visualizar"
aria-label="Visualizar ação">
```
So SSR rows have only data-action-id. The JS openActionViewOffcanvas reads data-action-title etc. — for SSR rows these will be null → title 'Ação' default etc. Another indicator of incomplete feature but part of confirmed #2. skip.
Alright, finalize comments.
Let me make sure text is pt-BR, direct, first sentence simple without jargon.
For comment 1 content:
"A mesma página passa a ter dois conjuntos de containers com os mesmos ids (`ssma-action-plan-type-bar`, `ssma-action-plan-deadline-bar`, `ssma-action-plan-project-gauge` e `ssma-action-plan-resolution-gauge`): um na aba Plano de Ação (já existente) e outro na nova aba Painel → Visão Geral. Como as duas abas ficam no DOM ao mesmo tempo (só trocam de display), `getElementById`/`$('#...')` sempre resolve para o primeiro nó — o da aba oculta — então os gráficos da Visão Geral são desenhados no container errado (ou falham com 'Chart already initialized'), e os containers visíveis do Painel permanecem no estado vazio; a exportação/print também captura o nó errado. Enquanto a aba Ações ainda renderiza esses charts, é preciso renomear os ids no Painel ou remover os charts duplicados da aba Ações (alinhado ao layout descrito), antes de seguir."
For comment 2 content:
"Este partial de avatares de responsáveis não é incluído por nenhum template (busca no repositório retorna apenas o próprio arquivo), então fica como código morto no bundle. Se a intenção era usar esses avatares na tabela do Painel ou da aba Ações, conecte o include; caso contrário, remova o arquivo para não manter dois caminhos de renderização de avatar (a tabela do painel já usa `_member_avatars_stack.html.twig`)."
For comment 3 content:
"Quando o HTML inicial (SSR) chega sem dados de análise/Adriana, o template renderiza só o estado vazio e não cria os contêineres `[data-ap-adriana-insights]`/`[data-ap-adriana-questions]`; depois, quando um filtro devolve conteúdo, esta função apenas preenche o texto semântico e não tem onde colocar insights/perguntas — o card da Adriana fica preso no estado vazio mesmo com dados retornando. Renderize sempre os contêineres com fallback interno (padrão do branch `else` do template) ou reconstrua o bloco completo a cada resposta do filtro."
Now — but wait, one consideration: The `renderSemanticAdrianaRow` with contentEl always present will set innerHTML of semantic panel; but if SSR had empty state, contentEl contains the empty-card-state markup; innerHTML replaced with content. This works only for semantic. Insights/questions remain placeholders. Correct.
But hold on — re-reading the template's adriana card: it uses a separate left col for insights? Actually layout: insights col & questions col inside adriana card. The empty-state in the SSR shows a full empty message inside insights col when no data; questions col has the fallback text. When data arrives, we need to replace that empty block with ol; can't. So bug stands.
Actually also check viewMode 'visao_geral' insights: main_insights & follow_up_questions; same partial. Bug applies to both views.
Let me finalize with 3 comments.
Also consider maybe one more finding: in the CSS file, `@container ap-ia-inner` — the container is `.ssma-ap-ia-inner-body` but the elements targeted `.ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns` (inside the semantic row) are NOT inside that container (they're inside separate cards). Also on `_action_plan_semantic_adriana` row there's no such structure. Confirmed #1 partially but container query entirely. Skip.
I think 3 comments suffice. Let me check no duplicate with confirmed list:
- #1 CSS dead rules
- #2 JS offcanvas broken
- #3 JS XSS raw insight
- #4 duplication JS/CSS
- #5 resetCustomSelect dead code
- #6 var usage
- #7 Twig raw insight
- #8 Twig offcanvas never included
- #9 html2canvas static include redundant
- #10 Twig JSON escaping
My comment 2 (dead responsible icons partial) is distinct from #8 (offcanvas partial). My comment 3 (empty state containers) distinct. Comment 1 (duplicate ids) distinct.
Let me write them.
Tool Calls (1)
code_comment
Show Details
Arguments
{"comments": [{"content": "A mesma página passa a ter dois conjuntos de containers com os mesmos ids (`ssma-action-plan-type-bar`, `ssma-action-plan-deadline-bar`, `ssma-action-plan-project-gauge`, `ssma-action-plan-resolution-gauge`): um na aba \"Plano de Ação\" (já existente em `_tab_action_plan.html.twig`) e outro na nova aba Painel → Visão Geral. Como as abas ficam no DOM ao mesmo tempo (só trocam de display), `getElementById`/`$('#...')` resolve sempre para o primeiro nó — o da aba oculta — e o `initSsmaActionPlanCharts`/`refreshSsmaActionPlanCharts` desenha os gráficos no container errado (ou falha com chart já inicializado), deixando os containers visíveis da Visão Geral presos no estado vazio e quebrando também a captura para exportação. Enquanto a aba Ações ainda renderiza esses charts, é preciso renomear os ids no Painel ou remover os charts duplicados da aba Ações (layout descrito) antes de seguir.", "existing_code": " <div id=\"ssma-action-plan-project-gauge\" style=\"height: 360px; min-height: 360px;\">{{ action_plan_empty_chart_state }}</div>", "category": "bug", "severity": "high", "path": "templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig"}, {"content": "Este partial de avatares de responsáveis não é incluído por nenhum template — a busca no repositório retorna apenas o próprio arquivo —, então fica como código morto que mantém dois caminhos de renderização de avatar (a tabela do painel já usa `_member_avatars_stack.html.twig`) e depende de variáveis (`member_by_id`, `action_item`) que não estão garantidas no contexto. Se a intenção era usar esses avatares na tabela do Painel ou da aba Ações, conecte o include com as variáveis corretas; caso contrário, remova o arquivo desta PR.", "existing_code": "{% set executor_id = (action_item.responsible_ids|default([]))[0]|default(0) %}", "category": "maintainability", "severity": "low", "path": "templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig"}, {"content": "Quando o HTML inicial (SSR) chega sem dados de análise/Adriana, o template renderiza apenas o estado vazio e não cria os contêineres `[data-ap-adriana-insights]` e `[data-ap-adriana-questions]`. Depois, quando um filtro devolve conteúdo, esta função só preenche o texto semântico (`contentEl`) e não tem onde inserir insights/perguntas — o card da Adriana fica preso no estado vazio mesmo com dados voltando a existir. Renderize sempre os contêineres com fallback interno (padrão do branch com dados do template) ou reconstrua o bloco inteiro a cada resposta do filtro, para a transição vazio → com dados funcionar.", "existing_code": " var contentEl = row.querySelector('[data-ap-semantic-content]');\n var insightsEl = row.querySelector('[data-ap-adriana-insights]');\n var questionsEl = row.querySelector('[data-ap-adriana-questions]');", "category": "bug", "severity": "medium", "path": "public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js"}]}
Result
(async)
Request #28
deepseek-v4-flash
P:129.83K C:2.3K CR:129.79K CW:0
17818ms
Reasoning
Now let me consider if there are other genuinely distinct issues I should report.
Let me do one more pass over the JS to ensure no other clear-cut bug exists — particularly around the interaction of `initPanelConfig` and the config JSON containing `defaultPeriod` etc.
Also check: the config JSON `defaultPeriod: panel.active_period|default('next_month')`. In initPanelConfig: panelState.period = config.defaultPeriod. In bindPendenciasPeriodPopover, defaultPreset = panelState.period not starting with 'pend:range:'. If config.defaultPeriod is 'pend:range:...' from SSR active_period (when the user previously selected custom and the backend remembers), then defaultPreset = 'next_month'. The SSR date inputs not populated? initPanelConfig only sets period etc. In onPainelTabVisible, syncApPainelPeriodPresetUI(panelState.period...) is called which calls refreshApPanelPeriodLabel setting start/end from apPainelStartDate/EndDate defaults (today). For custom range from SSR, date inputs show today/today but period label says 'next_month'? Wait syncApPainelPeriodPresetUI(preset) where preset = panelState.period. If panelState.period starts with 'pend:range:', defaultPreset 'next_month'? Actually in onPainelTabVisible:
```
syncApPainelPeriodPresetUI(panelState.period && panelState.period.indexOf('pend:range:') !== 0 ? panelState.period : 'next_month');
```
If period is 'pend:range:...', preset 'next_month', so the UI label = next 30 days, ignoring the backend's active custom range. Hmm — so if backend persists custom period and user returns to the page, the panel resets to next_month label/period while actual SSR data was for the custom range. Then triggerPanelFilter? On load, if SSR labels present, no fetch. So UI (label) mismatches SSR data (rendered per custom range). That is a subtle bug, but does the backend persist active_period custom range? Possibly; active_period default is period param. But since SSR data comes with charts for that period, and the label shows next_month → mislabeled chart data. Hard to confirm backend behavior. Skip.
Another: 'pendencias' default axis option in template when axes present uses selected etc. OK.
Let me examine CSS file once more for a real syntax issue: `@media (max-width: 767.98px)` block:
```
#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root.ssma-action-plan-painel,
#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root {
padding-left: 12px !important;
padding-right: 12px !important;
}
```
fine.
Let me look for possible wrong usage of `#` id selector vs class `.action-plan-overview__...`. fine.
Potential CSS bug: `.action-plan-overview__filters-row` grid columns 8 items but actual template filter fields: overview filters row includes team, management, origin, period, unit maybe 5 items + clear + presets. The grid-template-columns: minmax(170px,1.35fr) repeat(7,...) auto implies up to 9 columns; actual filter fields fewer, so grid will have empty columns? CSS grid with fewer items fills from left; not harmful.
Potential template bug: In `_tab_painel.html.twig`, the "Pendências" filters row uses `filters-container tab-filters ml-auto ... d-none{% if panel_default_view == 'pendencias' %} d-lg-flex{% endif %}`. Wait it also has class `d-none` plus conditional `d-lg-flex`. If panel_default_view != 'pendencias', the row stays d-none always (no d-lg-flex). That's intended: default view controls initial display. But also there's `ssma-ap-panel-filters-row` CSS sets display:flex. Then in toggleHeaderFilters, when switch to pendencias, setApPanelFilterRowVisible adds 'd-lg-flex' (not removing d-none? it first adds d-none, then if visible adds d-lg-flex). Wait: `el.classList.add('d-none');` then if visible adds 'd-lg-flex' — but d-none overrides d-lg-flex? In Bootstrap, `d-none` sets display none !important? Actually Bootstrap `.d-none { display: none !important; }` and `.d-lg-flex { display: flex !important; }` at lg breakpoint. Both apply; the one that wins is determined by source order in Bootstrap CSS: responsive utilities come after base utilities in Bootstrap, so at lg+, `.d-lg-flex` overrides `.d-none`. Actually Bootstrap ordering: `.d-none` defined in base; `.d-lg-flex` in media query later → later rules win with same specificity + important. Both have !important. Later in stylesheet wins. So d-lg-flex overrides d-none at ≥992px. That is how setApPanelFilterRowVisible works: add d-none then add/remove d-lg-flex. Good.
But initial markup: `class="filters-container ... d-none{% if ... %} d-lg-flex{% endif %}"` - If panel_default_view pendencias, class d-none d-lg-flex. At desktop it shows. Fine.
But toggleHeaderFilters when viewId==='comparativo' → controls d-none. controls `#ap_painel_controls` d-none hides export and both filter rows entirely. But those filter rows are inside controls! Indeed `#ap_painel_controls` contains export-wrap, pendencias filters, overview filters. When comparativo, controls d-none hides the whole header actions. That's intended (no filters for comparativo).
Now when switching from comparativo back to pendencias: controls d-none removed. Then setApPanelFilterRowVisible(pendenciasFilters, true). Good.
OK.
Another important thing to check: Both filter rows are inside `#ap_painel_controls` and each has class `ssma-ap-panel-filters-row`. On desktop, both would be flex row if not toggled. toggleHeaderFilters on init ensures correct visibility. Good.
Now is `bindViewPills` handling 'comparativo' properly? In bindViewPills, `switchView(viewId)` plus if visao_geral fetch. For comparativo, no fetch directly from pill? switchView triggers 'comparativo' → destroyOverviewCharts then triggerPanelFilter('comparativo'). Wait switchView does: after destroying pendencias & overview charts, `if (viewId === 'comparativo') { triggerPanelFilter('comparativo'); }`. Yes.
Alright.
Let me verify there's no mismatch in applying filters to pendencias when not currently in pendencias (from the axis filter). The axis select is in pendencias content; hidden otherwise.
One more potential bug: `panelState.mine` default false; pendencias 'Minhas ações' switch triggers sync. OK.
Now perhaps the print export button within `#ap_painel_controls` also hidden on small screens? mhs-btn-secondary with d-flex; no responsiveness. skip.
Now, I'll also quickly double-check for template bug: In `_tab_painel.html.twig`, `ap_painel_unidade_options` references `ssma_head_office.name`, and `sub.id ~ ''` value as string 'id'. JS compares panelState.unidade !== 'todas' string. Backend param unidade is string; fine.
Now, potential issue: In `syncPendenciasFilterState`, when unidade filter is absent (non-network-head), panelState.unidade=''; In buildFilterParams, for pendencias view and element absent, no param 'unidade'. For SSR initial filter data default, backend filter default 'todas'? Not a bug.
OK. Let me also review `renderOverviewCharts` uses `initDistributionCharts` which triggers the duplicated id bug (comment 1). Good.
Let me also check `refreshSsmaActionPlanCharts` re-renders distribution charts into the actions tab container — same bug.
Now, in the JS, there is also `reflowDistributionCharts` calling `reflowSsmaActionPlanCharts`, which reflows charts in the actions tab hidden container. Not visible effect on the painel. Good enough.
Final set is 3 comments. Let me also confirm the `_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig` file new diff line text used as anchor exactly: `{% set executor_id = (action_item.responsible_ids|default([]))[0]|default(0) %}` appears at line 1 of the new file. Yes in diff.
Now also the anchor for comment 1: diff shows gauge line present. Yes.
Anchor comment 3: JS lines added. Yes.
Now finalize with task_done.
Review concluído para os arquivos do grupo. Confirmei e registrei três novos achados além dos já listados como confirmados:
1. **IDs duplicados de gráficos entre abas** (`_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig`): os mesmos containers `ssma-action-plan-type-bar/deadline-bar/project-gauge/resolution-gauge` já existem na aba "Plano de Ação" e foram re-criados na Visão Geral do Painel — como as duas abas ficam no DOM simultaneamente, o `getElementById`/jQuery sempre resolve para o primeiro nó (aba oculta), quebrando a renderização e a exportação dos gráficos da Visão Geral.
2. **Partial de avatares morto** (`_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig`): nenhum template inclui o arquivo; código morto com dependência de variáveis não garantidas no contexto.
3. **Transição estado vazio → dados quebrada no card da Adriana** (`action_plan_panel.js`): quando o SSR chega sem dados, os contêineres `[data-ap-adriana-insights]`/`[data-ap-adriana-questions]` não são criados, e a atualização via filtro não tem onde inserir insights/perguntas.
Os demais pontos relevantes (XSS via `|raw`/innerHTML, offcanvas nunca renderizado, botão "Visualizar" sem destino, html2canvas carregado sem necessidade, CSS órfão, duplicação de lógica e uso de `var`) já estavam registrados nos achados confirmados e não foram repetidos.
Tool Calls (1)
task_done
Show Details
Arguments
{"state": "DONE"}
memory_compression_task
Request #1
17787ms
Error
Error Detail
error reading response body: context canceled
review_filter_task
Request #1
deepseek-v4-flash
P:65.4K C:4.21K CR:2.05K CW:0
34037ms
Reasoning
Let me analyze each comment carefully.
The task: identify comments that the diffs prove to be factually wrong. Ground A: comment targets code not in its subject file's diff. Ground B: a specific diff line literally contradicts the comment's central claim.
Protected subjects: memory safety, concurrency, linkage/declaration consistency, behavioral/compatibility change, unused parameter. Comments about these must be approved.
Let me go through each comment.
**c-0**: path `public/css/ssma/action_plan_panel.css`. Content says rules like `.ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns/item`, `.ssma-ap-overview-semantic-icon*` and `@container ap-ia-inner` don't find corresponding markup in templates of this PR; semantic analysis rendered uses `.ssma-panel-semantic`/`.ssma-semantic-focus`, and `.ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns` doesn't exist anywhere. Suggests removing orphan styles or linking to real classes.
The subject file is the CSS. The claim is that the CSS rules are orphans — no markup. Is this a "factual wrong" claim provable from the diff? The CSS file contains these classes (that's where they are defined). The comment is about whether markup exists. We'd need to check templates. The templates in the group: `_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig` uses `.ssma-panel-semantic` and `.ssma-semantic-focus`... Actually in that partial, I see `.ssma-panel-semantic` (data-ap-semantic-content div with class ssma-panel-semantic). And semantic items use `.ssma-semantic-focus`.
The CSS defines `.ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns` etc. Do any templates in the group use these classes? Let me search the templates: `_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig` - no `.ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns`. `_tab_painel.html.twig` - no. The partials - no. So within the group, no markup uses these CSS classes.
But wait, is this a claim provable false from the diff? Ground A requires code absent from subject file's diff. But the comment is about markup elsewhere (templates), claiming classes have no corresponding markup. Hmm. Actually the CSS file is new and contains those classes, so the CSS rule code IS in the subject file's diff. The comment's central claim is about unused/orphan CSS — that requires knowing the whole codebase; the Agent claims it searched. We can't verify from the diff that no template anywhere uses these classes. This is not Ground A (code present in subject file's diff) nor Ground B (no diff line contradicts). The claim "não existe `.ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns` em lugar nenhum" — within the files shown, indeed no template uses it. But the Agent has access to the whole repo. We can't prove it wrong. Also this is more of a low-value/style/unused-code cleanup comment. Not provably wrong. Approve.
Wait — but is it about "unused" code? There's a protected subject "unused parameters" but not unused CSS. The comment is a cleanup suggestion. Not provably incorrect. Approve.
**c-1**: path `public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js`. Content: clicking "Visualizar" in pendências table doesn't open details: the function fills fields `ssma-ap-action-view-title/id/origin/...` and tries to open `openOffcanvasssmaApActionView()`/`#ssmaApActionView`, but none of those identifiers exist in HTML rendered in this PR. The offcanvas created in `_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig` uses `data-ap-detail` selectors and id `ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas`, and isn't even included by any template. So the flow falls into `if (!canvas) return` and user sees nothing.
Let me look at the JS openActionViewOffcanvas function:
```js
function openActionViewOffcanvas(btn) {
...
setText('ssma-ap-action-view-title', title);
...
if (typeof window.openOffcanvasssmaApActionView === 'function') {
window.openOffcanvasssmaApActionView();
return;
}
var canvas = document.getElementById('ssmaApActionView-offcanvas-wrapper')
|| document.getElementById('ssmaApActionViewOffcanvas');
if (!canvas) {
return;
}
...
}
```
The offcanvas partial `_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig` uses modal_id `ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas`. The embed from `components/_modal_offcanvas.html.twig` presumably renders an element with id like `ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas-offcanvas-wrapper` (based on the CSS in the partial: `#ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas-offcanvas-wrapper .offcanvas-header`). The JS looks for `ssmaApActionView-offcanvas-wrapper` or `ssmaApActionViewOffcanvas` — note the difference in capitalization: `ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas` vs `ssmaApActionView`. So the JS ids do not match the template.
Now, is the offcanvas partial included anywhere in the diffs? Let me check. The templates shown: index.html.twig, partials (_action_plan_responsible_icons, _action_plan_semantic_adriana, _action_plan_view_offcanvas), tabs (_tab_painel, _tab_painel_visao_geral). In _tab_painel.html.twig and _tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig, I don't see an include of _action_plan_view_offcanvas. So within this diff group, the offcanvas is not included. But maybe it's included in _tab_action_plan.html.twig which isn't shown (it existed before—the diff for index.html.twig shows `{% include 'ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_action_plan.html.twig' %}` unchanged, i.e. pre-existing). The Agent says search for `_action_plan_view_offcanvas` only finds the file itself. We can't verify. But is this comment provably wrong from the diff? The comment claims identifiers `ssma-ap-action-view-title` etc. and `#ssmaApActionView` don't exist in HTML, and that the offcanvas is never included. This is about runtime behavior. Not provable false.
Actually, wait — is this a behavioral claim? Protected subject: behavioral change? Hmm, the comment describes a behavioral bug (button click does nothing). Is that a "behavioral or compatibility change" protected subject? The protected subject refers to "a message, field, status, or default that the old code produced and the new code no longer does; an altered error path; a counter whose update moved..." This is about new code, not a change. But regardless, we can't prove it wrong. The ids in JS really are `ssmaApActionView...` and template has `ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas`. Wait, actually the JS fallback: `document.getElementById('ssmaApActionView-offcanvas-wrapper')` — this might match an id generated by the offcanvas component. The offcanvas modal_id is `ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas`, which typically would generate wrapper id `ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas-offcanvas-wrapper`. The JS looks for `ssmaApActionView-offcanvas-wrapper`. These don't match. So the comment's factual description of the mismatch seems consistent with the diff. Not contradicted. Approve.
**c-2**: XSS in Adriana insights inserted as raw HTML in JS. Central claim: insights rendered via innerHTML without escaping. In `buildAdrianaInsightsHtml`:
```js
return insights.map(function (item) {
return '<li>' + item + '</li>';
}).join('');
```
Yes, item inserted raw. The comment says treat as text/escape. This is about... a security/XSS issue, maybe behavioral. Not a protected subject per the list (memory safety, concurrency, linkage, behavioral/compat change, unused parameter). XSS/escaping isn't in the protected list. Hmm, but is the claim factually wrong? The diff shows item inserted raw into innerHTML string. So the comment is accurate. Approve.
**c-3**: code duplication comment. updateKpiRow and updateOverviewKpiRow are near-identical copies (~50 lines each). This is true from the diff — both functions exist and look similar. It's a maintainability/style comment but what it states is true (they are duplicated). Not factually wrong. Approve.
**c-4**: `resetCustomSelect` has no caller in repo. Search returns empty, so dead code. We can only see the diff. In the diff, is resetCustomSelect called anywhere in this JS file? Let me search... I don't see a call to `resetCustomSelect(` in the JS. It's defined. Is it called in other files? We can't see. The Agent claims full repo search returns nothing. We cannot verify. Not provably wrong from diff. Approve.
Actually wait — could the diff itself contradict? No. Approve.
**c-5**: uses `var` throughout, inconsistent with repo rule requiring `let`/`const`. This is a style comment. What it states — the file uses `var` — is true. Style/formatting comment with true statement → approve (value veto applies anyway; but the comment notes it's style). Approve.
**c-6**: `|raw` in Twig template injects insight without sanitization. Content is about security/XSS. The `{{ insight|raw }}` exists in the diff. Claim factual. Not protected subject. Approve.
**c-7**: The offcanvas never rendered; no template includes `_action_plan_view_offcanvas`. Similar to c-1. Central claim: partial never included, so Visualizar button has no place to show details. From the diffs we can't verify whole repo. The partial is in the group but no other template in the group includes it. However, could be included in a pre-existing template not in the diff (like _tab_action_plan.html.twig). The comment says a repo search finds only the file itself. We can't contradict. Approve.
**c-8**: html2canvas script (~1MB from external CDN) downloaded every time the Painel tab opens, even for those who never export; the JS already implements `ensureHtml2Canvas()` with on-demand loading, making the static include redundant (the JS loader never gets to load the script since it's already loaded).
Central factual claim: the html2canvas is statically included in _tab_painel.html.twig AND ensureHtml2Canvas exists. Both true from diff. The claim "o loader do JS nunca chega a carregar o script" — because the script is already loaded by the static include, `ensureHtml2Canvas` resolves immediately. That's consistent.
Actually let me verify ensureHtml2Canvas logic: if `typeof window.html2canvas === 'function'` resolve(true); else dynamically load. Since static script tag is included, when export clicked, html2canvas is present → returns true immediately without dynamic load. So the dynamic loader would never be exercised. The comment's claim is consistent with the diff. Is there anything factually contradicted? No. Also, note there's double inclusion consideration: static tag plus loader. The claim is accurate based on what we see. Approve.
Hmm, one thing: is c-8 possibly wrong about "downloaded every time the tab Painel opens"? The script tag is in `_tab_painel.html.twig`, which is included within `tab_plano_painel_content` div. Actually the index template includes `_tab_painel.html.twig` inside a div with `style="display:none;"`. So it's part of the page load regardless of tab visibility — downloaded when the page loads (index.html.twig always includes all tab contents). So it's downloaded on page load, not when the tab opens specifically. The comment says "baixado toda vez que a aba Painel abre" — that's a slight inaccuracy, but the substance (it's loaded eagerly via static include, adding bandwidth) is true. The diff shows the include is inside the painel content div which is included unconditionally in index. Anyway, minor imprecision in citation; central claim holds. Approve.
**c-9**: JSON data embedded in `<script type="application/json">` without escaping `<`/`>`. The json_encode escapes `/`, neutralizing `</script>` sequence usually, but other modules use `json_encode(15)` (JSON_HEX_TAG|AMP|APOS|QUOT). The claim: this module embeds without escaping hex tags. Looking at the diff: `{{ panel|json_encode|raw }}` — yes plain json_encode without flags. So claim factual. Not protected. Hmm, but wait — could it be argued there's no XSS since it's in an application/json script block and the content is parsed via JSON.parse then inserted via DOM textContent etc.? The comment itself acknowledges `/` escaping neutralizes `</script>`. It's a security-hardening suggestion. Not provably false. Approve.
Now, are any of these comments provably wrong (Ground A or B)? Let me reconsider each with the bar.
Ground A requires that the comment targets code not present in its subject file's diff. All comments quote existing_code lines that appear in the diffs. Let me verify each:
- c-0: existing_code `#ssma-action-plan-dashboard-root .ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns {` — appears in CSS diff. The comment is about CSS rules being orphans. The code is present in subject file. Not Ground A. Ground B? Comment says classes don't find markup. Can't find contradicting diff line. Approve.
- c-1: existing code appears in JS diff. Comment about mismatched identifiers. Not contradicted.
- c-2: JS diff contains the code. Accurate.
- c-3: functions exist in diff. Duplication true.
- c-4: function defined in diff, claim no callers. Can't verify, not contradicted.
- c-5: style claim true.
- c-6: `|raw` present. Accurate.
- c-7: partial present in group. Claim it's never included. Can't verify across whole repo.
- c-8: static html2canvas include present, ensureHtml2Canvas present. Accurate.
- c-9: json_encode raw present. Accurate.
So no comment clears the removal bar. The expected outcome: approve all.
Let me double check c-4: is there any call to resetCustomSelect within the diff of action_plan_panel.js? I should scan. Searching "resetCustomSelect" in the JS... only definition at line. No calls. So within the file diff no callers. But the comment claims no callers in repository. Other files in the group (CSS/templates) don't call it either. Can't prove wrong. Approve.
c-1 detail: Actually let me reconsider whether c-1's central claim is contradicted. The claim includes "nem sequer é incluído por algum template — então o fluxo cai no `if (!canvas) return`". Could the offcanvas be included in the rendered HTML? In the group, we see templates. Actually, is `_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig` included by `_tab_painel.html.twig`? Let me search the diff of _tab_painel: I don't see any include of that partial. The partial `_action_plan_responsible_icons` also isn't included in the diffs shown, but that could be used in pre-existing templates. So we can't conclude.
The comment is largely about behavioral function (click does nothing) which we cannot verify. And the identifier mismatch is real: JS uses `ssmaApActionView*`, template modal id is `ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas`. So the comment is at least internally consistent. Approve.
Given the instruction to approve by default and that none is provably wrong, call approve_all_comments.
Let me produce the final answer with approve_all_comments tool.
I'll work through each comment against the two removal grounds.
**Step 1 — Protected subjects:** c-1 and c-7 touch on a behavioral flow (Visualizar button opening details), but they are claims about *new* code behavior, not a compatibility/behavioral *change*, and they rest on an inability to find the offcanvas include. c-2 and c-6 concern XSS/escaping — not in the protected list. No comment is auto-approved purely by the veto list, though several must still be approved on the merits below.
**Step 3/4 analysis per comment:**
- **c-0** — Subject is the CSS file, which genuinely contains `.ssma-ap-overview-semantic-columns`, `.ssma-ap-overview-semantic-icon*`, and the `@container ap-ia-inner` block. The claim (no markup uses these classes) is a repo-wide claim I cannot refute from the group; no diff line contradicts it, and the rules *are* in the subject file. Not removable.
- **c-1** — The JS really does target `ssma-ap-action-view-title/...` and fall back to `ssmaApActionView...`, while the offcanvas partial uses `ssmaActionPlanViewOffcanvas` + `data-ap-detail`. The claimed mismatch is consistent with the diff; whether the partial is ever included is unverifiable here. No contradiction.
- **c-2** — `buildAdrianaInsightsHtml` really does concatenate `'<li>' + item + '</li>'` without escaping. Claim is factually supported, not contradicted.
- **c-3** — `updateKpiRow` and `updateOverviewKpiRow` do exist as large, near-identical bodies in the diff. Claim of duplication is true.
- **c-4** — `resetCustomSelect` is defined in the JS and I find no call to it in the shown files; the "no caller in repository" claim is unverifiable from the diff and not contradicted.
- **c-5** — The file does use `var` throughout; it's a true style claim.
- **c-6** — `{{ insight|raw }}` is literally present in the template. Claim supported.
- **c-7** — The partial exists but no template in the group includes it; the repo-wide "never included" claim can't be disproven from the diff (a pre-existing `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` isn't shown).
- **c-8** — The static `<script>` tag for html2canvas is present in `_tab_painel.html.twig` *and* `ensureHtml2Canvas()` lazy-loads it in the JS. The comment's central point (static include makes the eager download redundant with the on-demand loader) is consistent with the diff.
- **c-9** — `{{ panel|json_encode|raw }}` with no `JSON_HEX_*` flags is exactly what the comment describes. Supported.
No comment meets Ground A (all quoted code appears in its subject file) and no diff line literally contradicts any central claim. Approve all.
Tool Calls (1)
approve_all_comments
Show Details
Arguments
{}
Request #2
deepseek-v4-flash
P:64.16K C:2.16K CR:57.47K CW:0
15914ms
Reasoning
Let me analyze each comment carefully.
Comment c-0 is on public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js. It claims that when the initial HTML (SSR) arrives without semantic/Adriana data, the template renders only the empty state and does not create containers `[data-ap-adriana-insights]` and `[data-ap-adriana-questions]`. Then when a filter returns content, this function only fills semantic text (contentEl) and has nowhere to insert insights/questions — the Adriana card stays stuck in empty state even when data returns.
Wait — let me look. The JS function renderSemanticAdrianaRow queries `[data-ap-adriana-insights]` and `[data-ap-adriana-questions]`. The subject is the JS file. The comment says the JS only fills text and there's no place for insights/questions.
But wait, the subject file is the JS file, and the comment targets the JS file's logic. Let me think about Ground A/B.
The comment describes behavior: function only fills contentEl; insightsEl/questionsEl would be null because template doesn't create them in empty state. Let me check the template `_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig` (sibling). In that template:
```
{% if _no_data and _insights|length == 0 %}
<div class="d-flex flex-column ...">
... empty ...
</div>
{% else %}
<ol class="ssma-panel-adriana-insights ssma-adriana-insights-list mb-0" data-ap-adriana-insights>
...
</ol>
{% endif %}
```
So indeed, when no data, the `data-ap-adriana-insights` container is NOT rendered. Similarly for questions. So the JS renderSemanticAdrianaRow would find insightsEl = null and questionsEl = null in the empty state, and only update contentEl. So when data returns, contentEl updates but insights/questions containers are absent.
Hmm, but is that a claim that's refuted by the diff? The comment is about the JS function in the subject file. The JS code indeed only does:
```
if (contentEl) { contentEl.innerHTML = ...; }
if (insightsEl) { insightsEl.innerHTML = ...; }
if (questionsEl) { questionsEl.innerHTML = ...; }
```
So if insightsEl and questionsEl are null (because the template in empty state doesn't create them), the JS never adds them. The claim is coherent. This is not provably wrong from the diff. Whether the template actually keeps the empty state stuck — depends on logic in template that we can see: the template conditional `{% if _no_data and _insights|length == 0 %}` renders an empty div without the data attributes. And the JS renders content into contentEl which... wait, in the template, when no data, the `[data-ap-semantic-content]` div contains the empty card state include. The JS overwrites contentEl.innerHTML with either buildOverviewSemanticHtml or buildPendenciasSemanticHtml. These functions return the empty HTML if no content... Actually if data returns (hasContent), they return summary text. So contentEl gets updated. But insightsEl/questionsEl don't exist → they're null → skip. So indeed insights/questions won't appear.
Wait, but is there a case where insights exist but semantic doesn't? The template's _no_data is when neither semantic nor adriana has content. When insights exist, _no_data false, so containers rendered. When a filter returns data where semantic empty but adriana has content... then in the JS, contentEl innerHTML would be set to buildPendenciasSemanticHtml with empty semantic → returns empty state html. Hmm.
Anyway, this comment is about runtime behavior and the interaction of template and JS. It's not provably wrong by the diff. It requires reasoning. Not Ground A (the code it describes—the function renderSemanticAdrianaRow—is present in subject file). Not Ground B. So approve.
Actually wait — could it be Ground A? The comment targets `renderSemanticAdrianaRow` in the JS file. It's present. The claim about template is about sibling file `_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig` which is in the group. The template shows that indeed empty state doesn't render the data-ap-adriana-insights containers. So the comment seems correct actually. Approve.
Comment c-1 is on templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig. It claims the partial is not included by any template — repo search returns only the file itself — so dead code. Also it depends on variables not guaranteed.
Ground A: The comment's subject is about the file not being included anywhere. The diff we see includes this new file plus other templates. We can't see all files in the repo — the Agent searched. We can check: is it included in the diff group's templates? Looking through the diff: _tab_painel.html.twig includes `_member_avatars_stack.html.twig`, `_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig`, `_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig`, etc. I don't see `_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig` included anywhere in the diff group. But we can't search the whole repo. The comment is a claim that the Agent verified via repository search which we can't replicate. It's not provably wrong from the diff. The subject file diff contains the file itself (new). The comment doesn't claim anything about a specific diff line being contradicted. So approve.
Actually, is the comment perhaps wrong because the file is included somewhere in this group? Let me double check the templates in the diff for includes of `_action_plan_responsible_icons`. In index.html.twig includes `_tab_action_plan.html.twig` (not in group), `_tab_painel.html.twig`, `_tab_action_plan_config.html.twig` (not shown). _tab_painel includes `_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig`. None include the responsible icons partial. So can't refute. Approve.
Comment c-2 is on templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig. It claims the same page now has two sets of containers with the same ids (ssma-action-plan-type-bar, ssma-action-plan-deadline-bar, ssma-action-plan-project-gauge, ssma-action-plan-resolution-gauge): one in the "Plano de Ação" tab (already existing in _tab_action_plan.html.twig) and another in the new Painel → Visão Geral tab. Since the tabs remain in DOM at the same time, getElementById resolves to the first node — the hidden tab's — and charts draw in wrong container.
Subject file: _tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig. The diff shows this file contains ssma-action-plan-type-bar, ssma-action-plan-deadline-bar, ssma-action-plan-project-gauge, ssma-action-plan-resolution-gauge ids. Yes, they appear in the diff.
The claim about _tab_action_plan.html.twig containing the same ids — that file is NOT in the diff group. We can't verify. The Agent claimed repo search found duplicates in the already-existing _tab_action_plan.html.twig. Since that file is not in the diff, we can't confirm or refute. We can't prove it wrong.
Wait, is the comment describing a real behavior that could be refuted? Actually, there's subtlety: the two "tabs" - tab_plano_acoes and tab_plano_painel - are tab-panels that toggle display via `style="display:block/none"`. The new _tab_painel_visao_geral includes containers with those ids. If _tab_action_plan also has them, yes duplicates. But that's dependent on a file we don't see. We cannot establish Ground A or B. Approve.
Also, is this a protected subject? Behavioral change? The chart rendering issue is arguably a behavioral/functional bug, but protected subjects here: memory safety, concurrency, linkage, behavioral/compat change... Hmm "Behavioral or compatibility change — a message, field, status, or default that the old code produced and the new code no longer does". The comment is about new duplicate IDs causing incorrect chart rendering. Not exactly in protected categories. But regardless, we can't prove it wrong from the diff. The subject file diff shows those IDs are created there. The claim that they also exist in _tab_action_plan.html.twig is not in our diff. We can't refute. Approve.
So all three comments should be approved.
Let me reconsider c-0 more carefully for Ground A. The comment's "existing_code" shows renderSemanticAdrianaRow's lines querying contentEl, insightsEl, questionsEl. That's present in the subject file. The claim: "Quando o HTML inicial (SSR) chega sem dados de análise/Adriana, o template renderiza apenas o estado vazio e não cria os contêineres [data-ap-adriana-insights] e [data-ap-adriana-questions]." This is a claim about the template. We can check the template _action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig in the group. Indeed when `_no_data and _insights|length == 0`, it renders the 💤 empty div, no data-ap-adriana-insights. And in questions column: `{% if _no_data and _questions|length == 0 %}` renders fallback p, no data-ap-adriana-questions. So the claim holds for the SSR state. The JS function then can't update insights. This is consistent. So approve.
All approve.
Tool Calls (1)
approve_all_comments
Show Details
Arguments
{}
Review Comments (13 findings)
public/css/ssma/action_plan_panel.css 1 comments
public/js/ssma/action_plan_panel.js 6 comments
templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_responsible_icons.html.twig 1 comments
templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_semantic_adriana.html.twig 1 comments
templates/ssma/action_plan/partials/_action_plan_view_offcanvas.html.twig 1 comments
templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel.html.twig 2 comments
templates/ssma/action_plan/tabs/_tab_painel_visao_geral.html.twig 1 comments
No comments match this filter.