Session: cb270036-d7f1-4573-998b-ef90ec3cacd5

CWD: /var/lib/metahuman-ocr-worker/work/job-175/worktree Branch: HEAD Mode: range From: origin/new_staging2 To: origin/hotfix/permission-ocorrencia-general Model: deepseek-v4-flash Duration: 16m3s Files: 4 Status: complete

Coverage

4
Selected
4
Completed
0
Reused
0
Failed
0
Waived

Token Usage

6.29M
Prompt Tokens
104.35K
Completion Tokens
6.4M
Total Tokens
87
LLM Requests
5.99M
Cache Read
0
Cache Write
File breakdown 2 files
FilePromptCompletionCache ReadCache WriteTotal
src/Controller/SsmaController.php,templates/ssma/occurrence/… 6.29M 103.9K 5.99M0 6.4M
File Grouping 340 449 00 789

Review Comments (7 findings)

Severity:
Category:
src/Controller/SsmaController.php 5 comments
bug medium L10427-L10432
A nova regra exige que o gestor seja 'líder imediato' de alguém no escopo (ou o próprio superior de quem salva), e o front trava o campo para quem não é gestor. Quando o cadastro do usuário não tem 'Responsável' (superior) preenchido — estruturas sem hierarquia configurada — um Supervisor de Equipe (escopo de equipe, sem poder trocar o campo) fica sem gestor default e toda tentativa de salvar é recusada com 403 'Informe o gestor responsável.', sem nenhum fallback. Além disso, ocorrências antigas gravadas com manager_id que não é 'líder imediato' (ex.: ROS onde o relator era o próprio colaborador) passam a falhar na edição mesmo com o campo inalterado. Recomendo: na edição, quando o manager_id enviado é igual ao já gravado, preservar sem exigir a regra de líder; e na criação, quando não há superior cadastrado, não bloquear (deixar gravar sem gestor para o fallback de exibição ou permitir escolher outro líder do escopo).
Existing Code
        $leaderIds = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company);
        $ownLeaderId = $this->resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId($company, $user);
        $managerAllowed = isset($leaderIds[$managerId]) && isset($allowedMembers[$managerId]);
        if ($ownLeaderId !== null && $ownLeaderId === $managerId) {
            $managerAllowed = true;
        }
security medium L12320-L12327
O seletor do modal limita o 'Gestor responsável' ao escopo de equipe E área (o código da view cruza managerScopeIds com allowedMemberIds da área), mas a atribuição no servidor (applySsmaEventManagerAssignment) e a validação validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope usam apenas getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds. Para um Gestor de Área com área restrita e sem equipe esse filtro devolve null e o servidor aceita qualquer líder da empresa inteira como gestor, mesmo fora da área dele — o recorte aplicado na interface vira cosmético e uma request manipulada cruza o isolamento por área. Alinhe a atribuição/validação com o mesmo getSsmaPreventionAreaScope usado para montar as opções.
Existing Code
        $allowed = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company);
        $scope = $this->getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds($company, $user);
        if ($scope !== null) {
            $teamMembers = $scope === []
                ? []
                : $this->collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams($company, $scope);
            $allowed = array_intersect_key($allowed, $teamMembers);
        }
performance low L15590
Esse resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId roda dentro de mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow, que percorre todos os eventos da empresa em loadOccurrences (listagem do dashboard, centenas de linhas). Cada criador distinto dispara um findBy novo (o cache só evita repetição do mesmo par empresa/usuário dentro da request). Considere resolver os member_ids de todos os criadores em uma única consulta (WHERE user IN (...)) ou já trazer o created_by_member_id no SQL da listagem, para evitar N+1 a cada render.
Existing Code
            'created_by_member_id'   => $this->resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId($e->getCompany(), $e->getCreatedById()),
security medium L10427-L10429
A reescrita desta validação removeu a checagem que exigia que `person_id`/`people_ids` (pessoas envolvidas) pertencessem às equipes do usuário (mensagem antiga "As pessoas envolvidas devem pertencer às suas equipes."). Em paralelo, o filtro que restringia `allMembersForEventPeople` às equipes/área do usuário no modal também foi removido. Resultado: um Supervisor/Gestor de Equipe com escopo passa a conseguir referenciar qualquer membro da empresa como envolvido, tanto pela UI quanto por POST direto, sem nenhuma validação de escopo no servidor para pessoas. Como o objetivo desta PR é trocar a regra do "gestor responsável" para líder imediato, essa perda de restrição parece regressão não intencional — confirmar com produto e, se não for desejada, restaurar a validação de escopo das pessoas (ou ao menos manter o filtro do modal).
Existing Code
        $leaderIds = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company);
        $ownLeaderId = $this->resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId($company, $user);
        $managerAllowed = isset($leaderIds[$managerId]) && isset($allowedMembers[$managerId]);
performance low L12413-L12414
Este método (usado na listagem sempre que o usuário tem escopo de equipe/área) recarrega toda a lista de membros e equipes da empresa via `loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite()` para montar `$teamsById`, mesmo que o request já tenha carregado os mesmos dados no fluxo principal do dashboard. Em uma página que já é pesada, isso dobra uma consulta de empresa inteira a cada abertura. Como só o nome da equipe do evento anexado é necessário, é melhor receber `$teamsById`/`$teams` de quem chamou (ou carregar apenas o mapa de equipe dos eventos retornados) em vez de refazer o load completo.
Existing Code
        [, $teams] = $this->loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite($company);
        $teamsById = array_column($teams, null, 'id');
templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig 1 comments
bug low L935-L940
Nesta seção 'Responsável pelo cadastro', quando o criador não é resolvido (created_by_member nulo — ex.: ocorrências legadas sem created_by_id ou criador desligado), o fallback exibe reported_by_member, que é o gestor responsável (linha 529). Ou seja, o nome/avatar do gestor aparece rotulado como 'quem cadastrou', duplicando a informação da seção seguinte e rotulando incorretamente a autoria. Para ocorrências sem dado de criador o correto é exibir '—', não cair no gestor.
Existing Code
                    {% elseif reported_by_member %}
                        {% include 'components/ui/_member_avatars_stack.html.twig' with {
                            members: [reported_by_member|merge({'avatar': null, 'email': null})],
                            max_visible: 1,
                            size: 28
                        } %}
tests/Ssma/ssma_event_manager_leader_rule_standalone.php 1 comments
test low L87-L88
Essas duas últimas asserções são tautologias (99 !== 10 e 10 === 10) — não executam buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions nem applySsmaEventManagerAssignment. Todo o arquivo apenas duplica a lógica das funções em helpers locais e não passa pelos endpoints reais de criação/edição de evento nem por validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope. Como a PR mexe em regra de permissão (quem pode trocar o gestor / quem pode validar), o teste deveria cobrir o fluxo funcional/integração para pegar regressões de autorização como as descritas acima.
Existing Code
ok('Evento some para o criador se só olhar manager_id (regressão)', 99 !== 10);
ok('Criador volta a ver se created_by_member_id == ele', 10 === 10);
Files Reviewed 4 files
  • templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig
  • tests/Ssma/ssma_event_manager_leader_rule_standalone.php
  • src/Controller/SsmaController.php
  • templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig
Session Tasks 1 tasks
File Grouping 1 requests

grouping_task

Request #1 deepseek-v4-flash P:340 C:449 4140ms
Reasoning
We need to group files. Need decide semantically related. Files: Controller, templates occurrence_view and partial modal, test. Likely related to event manager leader rule? Let's examine. SsmaController.php modified (maybe route/action changes). Templates modified for occurrence view and modal event. Test added for ssma event manager leader rule standalone. Need group all? They seem same feature: SSMA event management maybe occurrence and leader rule. Could be one group. However maybe test standalone separate? Let's reason. We need output JSON array with groups. Could group all four together because controller + views + test for same feature. But test may be standalone unrelated? The test is about "event_manager_leader_rule_standalone" likely tests controller logic? The controller is SsmaController. Templates are occurrence view/modal event. Might be feature "SSMA occurrence event handling and leader rule". Need include all in one group? Let's see if any distinct concerns. - SsmaController.php: +427/-103 large change likely contains endpoints for event manager leader rule? It might handle occurrence, event modals. - Templates: occurrence_view.html.twig and _modal_event.html.twig rendered by controller actions. These are related to controller changes. - Test: tests/Ssma/ssma_event_manager_leader_rule_standalone.php – likely a functional/integration test for a specific rule scenario; standalone script maybe not PHPUnit? Added. It may test the same feature. So all likely same group. Could group [ "SSMA controller and templates for occurrence view/modal, with event manager rule test" ] with all files. Need output exactly JSON array. Let's create one group.
[ { "label": "SSMA occurrence view/modal and event manager leader rule", "files": [ "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig", "templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig", "tests/Ssma/ssma_event_manager_leader_rule_standalone.php" ] } ]
Conversations 1 files
src/Controller/SsmaController.php,templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig,templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig,tests/Ssma/ssma_event_manager_leader_rule_standalone.php 86 requests

plan_task

Request #1 deepseek-v4-flash P:25.57K C:15.25K CR:1.41K CW:0 132912ms
Reasoning
The user wants me to analyze code changes and produce a structured review plan in Portuguese (pt-BR). Let me carefully read the diff files provided. Files changed: 1. `src/Controller/SsmaController.php` — big PHP controller changes 2. `templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig` — TWIG template changes 3. `templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig` — TWIG modal changes 4. `tests/Ssma/ssma_event_manager_leader_rule_standalone.php` — new standalone test file Let me analyze each change: ### SsmaController.php changes: 1. **Member picker (`listCompanyMembers`-like endpoint around line 9139)**: - Added `$forResponsibleManager` flag from query param `responsible_manager`. - If `forResponsibleManager`: builds `$allowedMemberMap` from `collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company)` (leaders who have at least one active subordinate) intersected with scope IDs (occurrence team filter or area scope). Adds own leader id. 2. **Event manager validation around line 10402** (validateEventManager?): - Changed rule: previously manager had to be in `buildSsmaEventModalGestorMemberIdSet` (gestor cadastrado) OR allowedMembers. Now requires `managerId` to be an immediate leader AND in allowedMembers, or equal own leader. - Removed validation of `people_ids`/`person_id` belonging to allowedMembers. Wait — the old code checked people involved belong to allowedMembers. New code removed that people validation entirely. Hmm let me re-read. Old: ```php $gestorEligible = $this->buildSsmaEventModalGestorMemberIdSet($company); if (!isset($gestorEligible[$managerId]) && !isset($allowedMembers[$managerId])) { error } $peopleRaw = $details['people_ids'] ?? ''; ... build peopleIds ... foreach ($peopleIds as $pid) { if (!isset($allowedMembers[$pid])) { error 'As pessoas envolvidas devem pertencer às suas equipes.' } } ``` New: ```php $leaderIds = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company); $ownLeaderId = $this->resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId($company, $user); $managerAllowed = isset($leaderIds[$managerId]) && isset($allowedMembers[$managerId]); if ($ownLeaderId !== null && $ownLeaderId === $managerId) { $managerAllowed = true; } if (!$managerAllowed) { return 'O gestor responsável precisa ser líder imediato de alguém e pertencer ao seu escopo de equipe/área.'; } ``` So the people involved validation was removed entirely from this method. That means a member can now register an event with involved people outside their team scope? But wait — maybe the removal is intentional because the manager selection rule changed. Actually maybe people validation happens elsewhere. Hmm, the removal of people validation here is notable. But maybe the validation is elsewhere now or intentionally loosened. This is a potential risk: are involved people no longer restricted to the reporter's teams? This could be a scope issue (data isolation). Need to check `allowedMembers` semantics. Actually this method was validating that involved people belong to allowedMembers (manager's teams). Removing it could allow including people outside the manager's scope. Need to verify with code search what other validation exists e.g. in `normalizeSsmaEventPayload` etc. That's a potential medium issue about data integrity/scope. 3. **`isSsmaEventVisibleUnderOccurrenceTeamDashboardScope`**: added early return `true` if event created by current user. 4. **`canApproveSsmaOccurrence`**: Changed `ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR` to `ROLE_TENANT`; removed automatic bypass for `memberIsSsmaGestorAdministrador`. Now approval depends strictly on the approver config list. This is a security/permission change; need to ensure Gestor Administrador who is in the config list still can approve; not in list → cannot. Seems intended per comment. Need to confirm `ROLE_TENANT` semantics. The comment says tenant/platform always validates (same umbrella rule). Risk: users with `ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR` (Symfony role) lose approval ability unless in the config list — intended by bug-fix, but need to verify ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR role hierarchy — probably managed via role hierarchy where ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR may imply ROLE_MANAGER? Not sure. Potential regression if ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR doesn't imply ROLE_MANAGER but previously allowed. It's intended change though. Also removed `memberIsSsmaGestorAdministrador` bypass — meaning Gestor Administrador (tag member) can no longer approve occurrence unless explicitly in the approved list. That is intended per the meeting note. But need to double check the frontend: the button visibility. Might create mismatch: if Gestor Administrador had approval button before by tag, now they don't. There could be other places that use `canApproveSsmaOccurrence`/old logic. Need to search for other checks. Hmm. Good review point to check symmetry between controller and template/tests. 5. **`canCreateSsmaOccurrence`-like method around line 11423**: removed the `isSsmaViewer()` short-circuit that previously blocked supervisors. Now supervisors with the SSMA product config for ROS/Event can register. Intended per comment. 6. **Permission cache additions**: `ssmaMemberIdByUserIdCache`, `ssmaImmediateLeaderMemberIdsCache` as instance properties. Note: `collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds` cache keyed only by company? It's a single cache `?array` — but controller is per request so company is same. However `collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds(Company $company)` — inside a single request the company could vary? Within SSMA context probably one company per request. But there could be multi-company calls? SsmaController handles company of currently logged user; likely consistent. But `resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserIdCache` is keyed by company:userId so okay. The leader cache is only by `$company` param not stored keyed — if a request handles multiple companies this is a bug. Low likelihood. Possibly worth noting as low. 7. **`canUserAccessSsmaOccurrence`-type method (line ~11677)** — added `created_by_member_id` check: ```php $createdByMemberId = (int) ($occurrence['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0); if ($createdByMemberId <= 0 && $company instanceof Company) { resolve from created_by_id } if ($createdByMemberId > 0 && $createdByMemberId === $memberId) return true; ``` This is per-row logic, probably inside a loop that filters occurrences — actually this is within a specific method. Need to see context — probably `canSeeOccurrence`-ish. It was added at line ~11677. Let me find where. It may be a helper used in the listener loop. Not much context, but it's about visibility of occurrence rows: allowing the creator to see their own. But does the code then check the company? `$occurrence` presumably includes company? Since filtering already by company, okay. Potential concern: when a `created_by_id` user was removed/transferred to another company, resolving member id only in the given company prevents cross-company leakage — good. But note: the occurrence might be from a different company than `$company` passed... context needed. 8. **`resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId`** — cached now. 9. **New methods**: - `canSelectSsmaEventResponsibleManager` — allows SUPER_ADMIN, MANAGER, TENANT roles; member-based: gestor administrator tag, or tag names 'Gestor de Equipe', 'Gestor de Área', 'Gestor Administrador'. - `resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId` — finds the superior member. - `collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds` — DQL with fallback to repository; caches. - `buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions`. - `applySsmaEventManagerAssignment` — the new manager assignment logic. - `enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback` — fallback for manager id/name when manager_id <= 0. - `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser` — adds created-by-user events to list. Let me analyze correctness issues. **`applySsmaEventManagerAssignment`** for non-manager (canSelect=false): - If existing manager id > 0 keep; else set own leader id; If member has no leader, and no existing manager, manager_id stays unset/0. But form has `required` if `gestoresList|length > 0` — the select is disabled when can't change; disabled select won't submit value; hidden field? Need to inspect template — ev_manager value syncing. Anyway server-side uses defaults. If no ownLeader, manager_id = 0. Validation in the manager-validation routine shown earlier: `$managerId <= 0` returns 'Informe o gestor responsável.' So member without superior will fail to create events? That could be an issue: prior behavior `forceSsmaRosReporterForPlainMember` set manager_id = memberId himself as reporter. Now for ROS (and events), the "manager" must be immediate leader; if member has no leader (e.g., top of hierarchy / company owner / no superior), then create fails with "Informe o gestor responsável" or the server validation rejects because managerId not in leaders and not own leader. For `canSelect=false` (supervisor plain member can't change), with no superior and no existing manager, manager_id would be absent → validation error "Informe o gestor responsável." Actually the validation happens where? That manager validation at 10402 is probably called during creation. Let's see the validation snippet: it returned on $managerId <=0 'Informe o gestor responsável.' So yes if a regular member (with no superior set) tries to register ROS/event the request errors. That is an edge case but should be verified. The event view template requires field with asterisk. Real risk for organizations where the registrant's superior is empty. Level: medium. Need code search to see the validation for manager id <= 0 occurs for ROS too? Actually, managerId is manager_id field. Note old code for ROS plain member forced manager_id = memberId and validation passed because allowedMembers/member in gestor eligible? It validated $managerId within gestorEligible or allowedMembers. For plain member as relator, manager_id = self. `isset($allowedMembers[$managerId])` would be true if member is in own teams. So previously the member themselves could be the "manager" for ROS type. Now the member needs own leader. If structure doesn't define superior then blocked. This might be intended (new rule: gestor responsável = líder imediato; and "Informe o gestor responsável." when none — maybe they want it required). It is flagged in doc comment as rule Brenda; might be an intentional requirement change, but top-of-hierarchy users (owner/admin) have canSelect true with ROLE_MANAGER? Wait, `applySsmaEventManagerAssignment` with canSelect true and empty allowed list — if the request includes a manager from full company allowed? For admin with no superior, though, `collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds` would list leaders... For a company with only one member (owner) — the owner is not a leader of anyone (nobody below), no superior. Then no managers to choose? but `buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions` fallback? Let's look: `$gestoresForEventModal = $this->buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions(...)` — uses `collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds` intersect scope, plus ownLeader, plus existing occurrences manager ids. If nobody leads, list empty, then: `if ($gestores === [] && $allMembers !== []) { $gestores = $allMembers; }` — doesn't help manager list. Form shows "Gestor responsável *" but empty select => unable to create. That is a potential bug: single-member company or company with no hierarchy cannot register ROS/event. The old code fallback included all members in the gestores list: there was even that comment "Fallback final: gestor responsável usa escopo da empresa (não só equipe do supervisor)". They removed that fallback. So managers who don't have subordinates would not be selectable to be the responsible manager. Given rule: "gestor responsável precisa ser líder imediato de alguém" suggests they deliberately preclude leaderless selection. But a gestor who has team members is a leader only if hierarchy `superior` set. If a department manager uses team-based structure, no direct `superior` relationship to subordinates, then manager can't be picked & members have no immediate leader. In Brazil, teams often used. But product rule chosen says immediate leader from cadastro superior field. Might be deliberate, but there is a risk of blocking flows where hierarchical `superior` isn't populated but teams are. The validation error says "precisa ser líder imediato de alguém" — intended. Since spec doc says rule from meeting, likely deliberate. Still worth considering an inconsistency: `buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions` keeps occurrence manager ids in options (existing ones) even if not leaders — so editing can preserve legacy managers; and apply... when canSelect=true; requested equals existingManager preserved. Good. A big suspicious thing: ```php $allowed = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company); $scope = $this->getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds($company, $user); if ($scope !== null) { $teamMembers = $scope === [] ? [] : $this->collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams($company, $scope); $allowed = array_intersect_key($allowed, $teamMembers); } ``` but doesn't apply area scope here, unlike the picker code path in dashboard (lines 9139–9160) which also intersects areaScope. `canSelectSsmaEventResponsibleManager` returns true for Gestor de Area ('Gestor de Área' tag). For area gestor, allowed list should be limited to area members via `getSsmaPreventionAreaScope`, but `applySsmaEventManagerAssignment` only filters by `getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds`. What does that function return for area gestor? Possibly null (no team filter), meaning no scope restriction, area gestor can select any leader in company (area scope is broader/specific). This could let area manager assign leaders outside their area – data scope violation. Area scope logic is applied in the picker but not applySsmaEventManagerAssignment. Need to check what `getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds` returns for area gestor. In the picker path they additionally `getSsmaPreventionAreaScope` to intersect. The assignment path should be similar. This asymmetry is a candidate medium/high issue. Let me note to verify via code search of `getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds` and `getSsmaPreventionAreaScope`. Also in the member picker at 9139 the new logic intersects both team and area scope, but when areaScope->isRestricted() returns `$areaMemberMap` — allowedMemberMap computed as array_intersect. Ok. Wait — at 9139 in picker: for `$forResponsibleManager`, they compute `$occurrenceTeamFilterIds` from `getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds` (maybe used to scope). ScopeIds contains members belonging to that team filter (if non-null nonempty); area scope restricted; then allowedMemberMap = leaderIds ∩ scopeIds; add own leader. But note: when `$occurrenceTeamFilterIds === []` (empty list means?) scopeIds stays null → leaderIds unrestricted. Then area restriction may still apply. When both null & unrestricted, all leaders. Fine. **Potential subtle bug** in the picker: they never intersect leader with `$allowedMembers` param... Actually this is member picker list member IDs. Another potential: `$allowedMemberMap[$ownLeaderId] = true;` overwrites the map entry key; but the supplied data structure might later iterate and check `in_array`. Not a bug. **`enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback`**: uses `$this->entityManager->find(CompanyMembers::class, $createdByMemberId)` per row — N+1 issues when applied to a big list in `enrichOccurrenceManagerFields` for each occurrence row. The callback `enrichOccurrenceManagerFields` (via `appendSsmaEventTo...` maybe?) is called for every occurrence in dashboard list. If many rows lack manager_id and creator member id is resolved... Each find could be extra query; they already have memberById possibly in context but this fallback does find per occurrence with missing manager. Might be performance but only for missing manager rows — legacy data. Potential N+1. Medium/low. `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser` — queries all events created by user and maps them each call. Called only when `$occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== null || $occurrenceAreaFilterIds !== null` (i.e. dashboards with restricted scope). It fetches created events... the query: `findBy(['company' => $company, 'createdById' => $userId], ['eventDatetime' => 'DESC'])`. If user has events with another company, filtered by company (good). But wait: this method appends created-by-current user to the occurrence list irrespective of whether those events are in the scope; this overrides the team filter deliberately. This is for the dashboard team-scope when a person created an event but team filter excludes them. Deliberate product decision? — they added page permission check to view own. Need to consider cross company hidden id exposure? mapped row uses existing map functions. But another subtlety: For area scope on Prevenção Ativa: `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser` used when area filter is non-null — meaning someone in area-restricted scope sees events created by them even if the event concerns area outside their area? created event could have person in other area/unit but created by self. That is probably intended to make self-owned events visible across area filters too — new visibility rule (mirror of "criador sempre vê"). But data isolation by company secured. Visibility in `isSsmaEventVisibleUnderOccurrenceTeamDashboardScope` — if event is created by user id, returns true irrespective of the scope. Wait, event->getCreatedById() equals current user id => visible. That is fine. 10. **`appendSsmaEventModalGestorRow`** and `mergeGestoresFromOccurrenceManagerIds` referred to etc. Many helpers are removed or repurposed. `@deprecated forceSsmaRosReporterForPlainMember` now delegates to apply. 11. In dashboard filter list at ~13303: `$viewerMemberIdForCreated` computed from getCurrentCompanyMember each time. Adds filter: if occurrence created_by_member_id == viewerMemberId, keep even outside team. Wait this is in a different code path (supervisor team scope?). It uses `$occurrence['created_by_member_id']`. But careful: `created_by_member_id` for raw occurrence rows — appended rows from SQL have field `created_by_member_id` maybe derived from join then? Actually in the main SQL query, occurrences probably include `created_by_member_id`? The dashboard filter code around line 12984 might filter rows in PHP on team_id, manager_id, people_ids etc: they add created_by_member_id. Need to know whether all rows (when not from appendOccurrences) have created_by_member_id. They add via enrich only for some mapping. The filter at 13303 occurs before enrichment? It occurs where occurrences = raw arrays with created_by_member_id key possibly included by SQL (resolveCompanyMemberId uses... hmm). Actually maybe SQL includes `created_by_member_id` already. Wait, the row-mapping function `mapSsmaEventTo...` at 15587 adds `created_by_member_id` on the fly via resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId($company, id) — that's N queries if not cached; they added cache to mitigate. It's inside mapping of each event row → for each mapped row triggers resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId → uses repository query each cache-miss. With cache (company:user) it's one query per different user id. In a big list with many different creators could still create many queries. Original mapping used created_by_id user (no extra query). There is per-row resolution... Let's look: In `mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow` (line ~15587) added: ```php 'created_by_member_id' => $this->resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId($e->getCompany(), $e->getCreatedById()), ``` For every event row mapped. If the list covers many creators and cache absent, N queries. Usually mapping dashboard events: number of distinct users equal rows. That adds one query per row (CompanyMembers repository find) — performance N+1 on a dashboard list. With caching, repeated creator queries reuse. But if creators are mostly distinct per event (e.g., many different registrants), cache size per company grows one query each. 100+ rows could be 100 extra queries — mild to medium performance issue. Also cache array in instance: unbounded across company-user combos within request; small though. Also `created_by_member_id` improvement adds value to used in filters and enrich. 12. `SsmaController::canApproveSsmaOccurrence` references `ROLE_TENANT`, while `ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR` used in `ssma_is_gestor_user` still at 13349 plus other role uses? They remove `ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR` from canApproveOccurrence; but `ssma_is_gestor_user` included `ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR` still there: ```php 'ssma_is_gestor_user' => $ssmaIsTagTeamGestor || $ssmaIsTagAreaGestor || $ssmaProductTagName === 'Gestor Administrador' || $this->isSsmaAprofundamentoAdmin(...) || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR'), ``` OK. 13. `getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds` not diff but used; fine. 14. The dashboards search snippet at 22354 include `new allMembers` entries adding `superior_id`. 15. For the manager-validation logic removed the people ids validation. Possibly scoped elsewhere via team filter in lower-level `normalize`? But the removed check protected that involved people must be in allowedMembers. Now only responsible manager validated against allowedMembers; involved people no longer validated. Potential scope breach: a supervisor of team A registers ROS including a person of team B? Wait validation method likely is called by both create & edit to check both manager and involved people in scope. New version doesn't validate involved people at all in this method — meaning scope enforcement on people may be missing. Maybe normalizeSsmaEventPayload doesn't check either. Let's search maybe same code removed from two call sites. The diff removed the peopleIds validation and its error message. This likely changes the guarantee "As pessoas envolvidas devem pertencer às suas equipes." — if removed intentionally (manager restriction replaced) may still matter for data isolation across teams; a supervisor might register an event involving someone outside their team scope which may be allowed by product (people can be outside?) The old rule probably applied after the company? The method param `$allowedMembers` is the supervisor's scope (members belonging to teams). Supervisors were limited. Removing means supervisor could include colleague outside their team. Could this constitute data leakage? The target member just receives a notification / added as involved person. Might be considered permission bug. Medium. Need to verify there's no earlier validation of peopleIds at same level. We can search code for "As pessoas envolvidas" and "people_ids" validation in rest of controller. We'll plan code_search. ### occurrence_view.html.twig Changes label: For ROS occurrence, previously showed "Relatado por" with reported_by = manager ?: created_by. Now two blocks shown always (not only ROS): - "Responsável pelo cadastro": creator member or fallback reported by (now created_by_member first). If created_by key is member_<id> in member_by_id — uses created_by_lookup_id = created_by_member_id ?: created_by_id. This can break if `created_by_member_id` used as key with prefix "member_" for a CompanyMembers id but lookup table might be keyed by member id only for members in the current page scope. Members list member_by_id built elsewhere; if creator’s member id not present in list (e.g. outside scope) the code falls to manager display name?? If created_by falls when no member row, they show reported_by_member which is manager... Actually second condition `elseif reported_by_member` equals manager, but manager section separately shown in second block. Slight duplicate content '—' but fine. The issue: For ROS old behavior reported manager name might refer to manager. `manager_member` derivation? At top where set `manager_member` etc. They now display "Gestor responsável" always and manager may be null if fallback display name used? They show display name when manager_member absent and manager_display_name present, else em dash. In backend enrich they fill manager_display_name fallback with creator's superior info, and _row mapping sets manager_id to superior. Good. But there's a subtle regression: changed `reported_by_member = created_by_member ?: manager_member` to `created_by_member ?: manager_member`; and label now "Responsável pelo cadastro" for all, and the created_by lookup id uses created_by_member_id which is resolved as CompanyMembers->getId by controller if `created_by_member_id` is a CompanyMembers ID — matches member_by_id keys prefixed. If occurrence was created by a platform (created_by_id = user id which might not map to member) fallback resolves null, then reported_by_member is manager which is not necessarily creator. But label says Responsável pelo cadastro → shows manager (gestor). Might mislabel. Low-ish/medium. However, if `occurrence.created_by_member_id` is set as CompanyMembers id even though older template assumed created_by_id was a memberId... old code key 'member_' . created_by_id (user id?) Wait old template used creator via 'member_' ~ created_by_id, i.e., looked up member_by_id user id not member id? But member_by_id keys likely 'member_' plus CompanyMembers? In dashboards, IDs in member_by_id are... uncertain. In the controller mapping existing list added created_by_id key probably user id; original template used created_by_id with member keys and worked presumably because member_by_id map is keyed by user id? Hmm old code lines probably meant member PK was the same "created_by_id" term in dashboard raw rows (but inconsistent). This merits a code_search for member_by_id to check whether keys are user ids or member ids. New data adds both. Given all that, my role is not to resolve everything but produce plan calling out risk areas and tools to verify. ### _modal_event.html.twig - Adds `window.SSMA_CAN_CHANGE_EVENT_MANAGER`. - Disables select (disabled attribute) when cannot change. For disabled select no value in submit unless JS copies into hidden `ev_manager_hidden`? They need to see the actual submit handler. If select disabled but value chosen, jQuery serialize excludes disabled. They likely have a hidden input "manager_id"? Need to inspect JavaScript `evSyncReportedByFieldForType` and submit build payload; actually disabled elements are not submitted; but with hidden fields they use hidden updated triggers for manager etc. There may be code: on change/keys sync. Search template for `ev_manager` handling and 'details[manager_id]'. This is risk: if disabled select does not submit manager_id value, creation uses defaults manager id set by backend; but in edit mode with existing manager different from own leader, payload manager_id missing then applySsmaEventManagerAssignment sets existingManagerId (since existing >0) keep — Actually request data detail manager missing (0) but existing manager id>0 and canSelect false → server keeps existing (no data change) since when editing the hidden manager id not sent anyway. Use server side existing. OK for case canSelect false. When canSelect true (admin) not disabled; options chosen via searchable field with responsible_manager.manager... but dynamic remote field for responsible manager get server option list. - Template ev manager required if gestoresList length > 0. If list empty, not required and could be absent; server validation: managerId <=0 returns error 'Informe o gestor responsável.' for all? Wait, validation snippet returns 'Informe o gestor responsável.' when managerId <=0 condition is before leader check. This occurs in some validate method invoked for create/update? Let's locate; appears at original code 10402 etc. The validation being modified receives managerId>0, else returns generic. Could make all-event flows impossibility for no-hierarchy small company; maybe validators allow empty manager? Not certain; target plan: verify what triggers 'Informe o gestor responsável' & flows with empty gestoresList. - JS `evSyncReportedByFieldForType` now shows manager field and if canChange false disables. If member's own leader not in option list, they set from defaults with default manager id but if not in options (list shouldn't happen because build includes own leader) default maybe option not present → not set; hidden change no. but includes own leader deliberately. Good. - Another behavior: Previously if ROS & plain person: wrap class d-none; then value default own id ensured. Now wrap visible but disabled. If `SSMA_CAN_CHANGE_EVENT_MANAGER` false and select disabled with dummy placeholder selected value empty, CSS required state may bother; but server defaults still not apply when value empty because set from defaults set by backend when response loaded — defaults manager set to ownLeader when creating. So that is robust except no leader. - `SSMA_EVENT_FORM_DEFAULTS` created in controller included. If gestoresList excludes own leader? Build responsible options should include ownLeader. Search `SSMA_EVENT_FORM_DEFAULTS` defined elsewhere? Previously manager_id default set? not in template. Probably new. Need code search in twig for hidden sync. ### Standalone test - Tests helper functions copied from controller — not actual integration; does not use Symfony or DB. It duplicates functions keep/assign with exact logic. The rules mention test must cover real integration path, not isolated helper — earlier let actual bug. So finding: standalone PHP test only duplicates logic; does not guard real wiring; but it's shipped executable that appears as unit test; not run by CI likely. Low-medium; mention. Test logic bug? assignManager canSelect true... assignManager(true,10,40,10,$keepGestorEquipe) expected 10; wait existing is 10 (ownLeader), requested 40 not allowed, then the guard `$requested >0 && (isset($allowed[$requested]) || $requested === $existing)` false. next if existing >0 returns 10. fine. But test for "Membro sem escopo: vê todos os líderes da empresa" with keep(... null,10) returns [10,20,30]; leads to scope okay. However in real controller, member without team filter still picks all leaders then no? isMember limited by nothing else; yes - member can choose any responsible manager in company if selection allowed? Wait members cannot select (disabled). Fine. Now, choose issues to include with severity order and tools for verification. Let's define main candidate risk points: 1. **(high/medium) Data scope leakage or regression**: removal of people-involved validation (`As pessoas envolvidas devem pertencer às suas equipes`) — need to verify any replacement guard. Search callers & payload normalization. If no replacement, supervisor could list outside people. Medium-high security/isolation impact; categorize medium or high? This is team scope isolation but user picking another victim's name does not automatically grant data reading? Possibly they could add event with someone they don't manage; may see them in team picker etc. Supervisors only pick from allMembers (which in modal was filtered in allMembersForEventPeople in controller earlier based on old code at 12834 region?). Wait, in diff around 12834, `applyTeamEventScope` previously filtered allMembersForEventPeople by allowedMemberMap; now that filtering was removed. They removed lines: ``` - $allowedMemberMap = $this->collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams(...); - $allMembersForEventPeople = array_values(array_filter($allMembers, ...)); ``` and area scopes similar removal of `allMembersForEventPeople` filter. Now allMembersForEventPeople remains full allMembers regardless of team/area scope — people select not filtered to scope! It was previously used in ev people picker. If modal "allMembersForEventPeople" is used for selecting involved people (and no server check now), supervisors can involve anyone in company (all employees) even outside their team/area. Is that also product-intended? Since people might be from other teams; involved people can be arbitrary company members — previously they were restricted to teams, and removal could permit adding people from other teams / units across the company. The new big rule probably intended to make the picker include all; maybe a supervisor can add someone from other team? That would broaden access but attendees are within same company anyway; but across whole company with multiple units & occurrence team filter should probably respect supervisor's scope? Possibly Product asked? No evidence. Flag as medium-risk data scope; verify with README docs changes (not included) and search for allMembersForEventPeople use in template and people picker. 2. **Manager assignment constraints for area gestor**: `applySsmaEventManagerAssignment` ignores area scope (`getSsmaPreventionAreaScope`) while other selectors include area restriction. Potential area crossing. medium. Verify getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds behavior for area gestor (return null?) if null no team restriction means area manager could choose leader from other area. It also could not if team filter function returns restricted team list (maybe returns null for area gestor). Need code_search. 3. **Usability/functional regression**: members/admins without a configured superior (no leader) cannot register events — server-side validation rejects manager_id <= 0 with "Informe o gestor responsável" or cannot use select (empty options). Before this, in ROS member could self-assign; in Evento, manager pickers included gestores tag+allMembers fallback that allowed a manager choose self. New rule necessarily requires immediate leader relationship; a top-level manager or a single-member/small structure has them nothing. Intended may be but breaks new hire scenario. Need call to map team based leaders? Determine. 4. **ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR removal from approver permission**: intentional; risk that the role hierarchy maps ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR to ROLE_MANAGER or ROLE_TENANT? Verify security role config; search `ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR` definitions & hierarchy. If ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR previously allowed and now not listed in approvers, intended (meeting). But confirm there are no other approval flows/UI relying on canApproveSsmaOccurrence only for list. Also make sure the removed automatic tag bypass (Gestor Administrador) — a manager with gestor admin tag previously approved, now blocked, and no approval config for those company. Meeting note confirm "gestor admin if not in list doesn't even appear" so intended; not flag except verifying config list may be in database and no migration to add them? They rely on occurrences approvals config. Potential that some companies have no approvers set and had Gestor Admin as implicit approver; removing leaves nobody can approve (unless ROLE_MANAGER). This is a functional change severe for only admin gestor companies. Could be medium/high and intentional by product? The comment says explicit bugfix after meeting; but release should consider making sure settings list contains the desired managers. Not code bug though. Keep as low/verification step or mention medium as business impact gap? The instruction "Do not invent issues" — but if rule pushes regression could be actual still valid issue? We'd mark as low/verification: "confirm migration/documentation to guarantee approver list maintained". Yet the review plan asks issues only if identifiable risks; we can include as medium if concrete. But we need not resolve. 5. **Own event visibility to user in lists:** use created_by member resolution newly. Consideration: When `created_by_user_id` belongs to a member of the same company but the event areas/other teams? Then the creator always sees — new product rule apparently "Eventos cadastrados pelo login atual entram na listagem..." okay. 6. **Performance**: mapping with `resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId` on each row in mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow & enrich Occurrence manager fallback then N find of CompanyMembers per row since `resolve...` does repository query not entity find? It executes repo (query) each. okay caching. enrichment creator find per row only when createdByMember id missing... actually enrich creator and manager: it calls resolve once per row, fine. Potential N+1: removeCache... but bigger: `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser` calls loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite each time it is included — called once per dashboard load. Also loads all events by user. It is invoked twice in two branches? It is called inside if... at line ~13497 for restricted team branch and inside [elseif occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== null or area filter]; both are distinct; only once. But wait method is only called when filter scopes non-null. In the dashboards for Gestor-equipe? Fine. 7. **Template label mismatch** in view twig for ROS "Responsável pelo cadastro" likely shows creator as member; new field logic prefers created_by_member_id (member id). For old data created_by_id values actually user FK while legacy mapping in controller created_by_member_id not present then resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId... For occurrences read from DB raw (flash reports? maybe not). both displayed. 8. **Test isolation/validity** : standalone test only duplicates behavior; but code-review category. low. Product guidelines say "Teste deve cobrir caminho de integração real" - signal as pending (Atenção) - medium? priority "Se a PR alterou comportamento e não trouxe teste novo" sinalize (Atenção; Crítico se autorização...). This PR alters authorization around event manager assign and approval. The test approximates pure functions not route. That's an issue per rules custom: mark as attention/medium maybe low since we already multiple. 9. **Hidden risk: `ownLeaderId` types and superiors with isRemoved?** `resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId` checks superior isRemoved and company. In `applySsmaEventManagerAssignment`, non-manager update keeps existing even if existing manager was removed/member in another company - returning old managerId where superior no longer valid; Payload validation earlier on create? For update, existing managerId skipped via early return? canSelect false and existing→ returns with old invalid manager id? But editing preserving previously chosen manager (could be someone removed) gives old not accessible but required to keep. The manager options preserve by keep occurrences manager ids even if not in leaderIds, because editing full row shows old manager label. But if that manager was removed member, not find? Same as old data either. 10. **`manager_allowed` can return true when managerID same ownLeader even if ownLeader not within allowedMembers (allowedMembers provides leader set?)** intended. 11. **`collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds` only activates when superior's id included — but doesn't filter for removed superior's own status company; query DISTINCT cm.superior finds member. If such superior has company = current (yes, they are field). But we might include superior whose isRemoved=1? e.g., old superior rows removed but still referenced by active subordinate? if former supervisor removed, in cadastro member had been changed? removed superior with isRemoved 1 probably stays in subordinate.superior if not re-pointed. The old validation would allow selection of that removed superior. The immediate `resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId` explicitly checks superior removed and returns null; DQL query line does not check that superior removed (only `cm.isRemoved = 0` subordinate active). Potential mismatch: leaderIds may include inactive superiors, while a member ownLeader null if its superior removed. If employee's superior removed they can't create (default empty; list includes removed leader though). In the manager picker server options includes removed person leader as allowed. Could be moderate bug data consistency (removed superiors selectable). Worth verifying CompanyMembers.superior mapping with isRemoved filter and handling they likely need similar conditions. Add this as medium; verify by code_search uses pattern "superior" and isRemoved in analogous logic. Maybe too many issues. We should prioritize genuine risk. Concise plan table: prepare ordered list of likely candidate. Let's pick 6-8: 1. high — Remoção da validação de pessoas envolvidas e dos filtros de `allMembersForEventPeople` por equipe/área: a supervisor may involve outside team/area and leader; scope enforcement lost? verify with code search in normalize and template. Might downgrade after verification, but plan issue as candidate high? Since we are not certain product intent and rule about PR says risk of data scope/privacy "isolamento por empresa" requested; candidate severity choose medium/high. I'd phrase severity "medium" pending info? Instructions ask severity in plan; can be medium with verification. Let's phrase medium-high. Actually we could give high because possible isolation across teams/areas but still same company. Hmm choose medium: mitigated unknown. Wait rules define high severity security; scope isolation breach — per criteria considered critical potential. But confirming later. I'd mark candidate 2 medium. Maybe classify: Issues: 1. [medium] Potencial vazamento de escopo — fine. Let me think through the manager assignment more for a possible hard bug. Look at picker line 9139: When forResponsibleManager uses $allowedMemberMap starts from leaderIds (all immediate leader Ids in company), then intersect with scopeIds produce; note also `$occurrenceTeamFilterIds = $this->getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds`; if team filter ids is array of TEAM ids? Wait name says "TeamFilterIds" - Occurrence team filter IDs is team-IDs (e.g., team IDs the viewer manages)... and scopeIds maps via collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams — okay ids of members belonging to those teams. But might it be member ids? Read naming "getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds" returns array of team ids. Code verified. Now in applySsmaEventManagerAssignment scope same. But crucial: `canSelectSsmaEventResponsibleManager` returns true for member with Gestor de Equipe tag, and then selection list in apply filtered by teams returned by `getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds` — consistent with picker manager options (picker uses manager scope team ids and area scope). Actually picker for responsible manager further area restrict. But no strict major. The removal earlier old code at line 12834 had typical manager filtering; The important part set managers for event modal from gestores tag list and area filters to produce managerScopeIds... manager options code does same via scope. In apply mode assign uses consistent allowed; full consistency except `collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds` inside apply — but if area scope restricted, allowed should also intersect areaMemberMap; but apply filters by team scope only. Since manager options pass in picker respects area but assignment enforce respects only area? risk. Actually assignment payload manager chosen comes from restricted list of options after scope; But they allow manager should just validate from "allowed"; malicious user can send manager id outside; if allowed ignores areaScope then area misassignment. For the GestorArea, select uses same options from build which includes area; a benign user fine; malicious can bypass. I'll keep medium. Now high maybe the canApproveSsmaOccurrence changes could cause hidden error: diff changed the condition from ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR to ROLE_TENANT inside multi-line OR including ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN & ROLE_MANAGER. If security.yaml role hierarchy maps ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR => ROLE_MANAGER? check. `isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER')` in Symfony honored hierarchy. Let's plan search for `role_hierarchy`. Also affected existing "ssma_is_gestor_user" not related. Let's set issues: 1. high (?) server validation of people ids removed and filtered passed to template. Wait actually review plan works by listing candidate defects; but we need be precise. We'll add verification tool usage. Order after sorting severity maybe: A) [high] applySsmaEventManagerAssignment / can select mismatch & scope area — Actually medium. B) [high] potencial regression of functional flow when member has no immediate leader: It blocks event creation and error unclear. Yet it could be business intentional. Mark medium. C) [medium] area scope ignored in assignment enforcement (cross area). D) [medium] Removed people validation and member filtering -> cross-team scope: verify. E) [medium] Performance - N resolve queries & find per row, caching only per user company. Could be Low/medium. Actually the new row mapping adds query per row where distinct creator. Also `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser` every call full mapping. Also `enrichOccurrenceManagerFields` per row uses find if no manager; typical case manager exists so no query. The bigger thing is N+1 on distinct event creators mapping each event row (cache helps if same creator often). Dashboard lists across many rows, creators maybe same few (inspectors); limited. But method defined for map in a select maybe used many times? Map call for each event row only in append user events; yet created_by_member_id also added in main aggregate mapping (line 15587) probably for event rows in events list; distinct creators low. We'll mention medium low. Wait at line 15587 probably mapping single event used inside assemble of the filtered list rows; each event row leads query creator member: For each event view mapping. If e.g., 50 events from 30 users, up to 30 queries per page. Not pathological but... F) [low/medium] isSsmaEventVisible... creator check relies on event UserId equal, giving owner access beyond scope where previously event hidden. Could reveal data not team due to created own; intended? product comment says intended; skip. G) [low] Standalone test not integrated (custom rule). classify low but guidelines emphasize; maybe priority low and mention as pending. H) [medium] New allowed managers list contains removed/disabled `superior`s (only restricted in resolveLoggedMember...; not in collect query) - potential ghost managers selectable; verify that removed/past leaders are also excluded. DQL includes only rows cm.superior and cm.isRemoved=0 with superior id; if removed employee still is superior? Removed member likely not among leaders. For members whose superior is removed but subordinate stays active, leader set includes removed id; create forms might show removal choices plus; assignment validation allows; existing owner leader default null when ownLeader Null; user could choose removed name. Since possible high ghost activity. But not huge. Let's include only verified likely candidate: Focus three serious: 1. Removed subscriber old validation of involved people = scope and people filter from event modal; cross-team risk. 2. Manager select rules changed for users with no superior causing impossibility. 3. area-scoped manager assignment not enforced; plus mismatch finder & picker. Then medium performance. Then memory/cache key not by company flag. Need call a tool for: - code_search `As pessoas envolvidas` to see if validation still present. - code_search `allMembersForEventPeople` in SsmaController/templates to check usage and whether people picker now includes all company members; and remote endpoints params. - code_search `getSsmaPreventionAreaScope`, `getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds` to understand area and team. - code_search of canApprove / role hierarchy maybe. - file_read_diff is allowed? Only diff views of other files changed paths — Actually available file_read_diff not for unrelated file functions code_search current files. - The tool names in prompt are: code_search, file_read_diff (diff viewing of list changes) and file_find. No generic read. We must instruct only these available tools? Review planning should cite tools from list. file_read_diff can show diff of changed files, code_search search. For existing entities fine. For each issue list tool-call lines. Issue list ordering high → medium → low. 1. [high] Perda de restrição de pessoas envolvidas / escopo equipe/área no cadastro de evento ROS/Evento: Removida a validação `As pessoas envolvidas devem pertencer às suas equipes` no validador pós-submissão e os filtros que reduziam `allMembersForEventPeople` às equipes/área do usuário quando há recorte. In practice supervisor may choose employees outside their scope and save event recording with those as involved, rupturing isolation by team/area/company (but company still). Need verifies no guard elsewhere else revert. It will be two tool calls: → code_search 'As pessoas envolvidas' in src → code_search 'allMembersForEventPeople' in src & templates However check files outside diff? code_search searches whole cgb. Good. Could reflect that maybe allowed to involve because supervisors maybe selecting people in their team picker endpoint uses all members as options (template people select might derive from allMembersForEventPeople). likely. 2 [high or medium] Non-manager update: apply keeps existing invalid manager even if existing manager no longer immediate leader of someone? no current actual. Skip. Let's focus actual code BUG con precision: In the picker event modal at member endpoint: ``` $allowedMemberMap = $scopeIds === null ? $leaderIds : array_intersect_key($leaderIds, $scopeIds); ``` When ownLeader added after intersects — despite branch to show options. okay. New `managerOptions` `buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions` inserts occurrence manager ids to keep for editing so even legacy manager allowed returned in create option list then select makes owner's old manager select; okay. But member cannot change now Select disabled. However they can still tamper? `apply...` ensure requested overridden for canSelect false. Now high bug 2: Editing an existing event when member's current superior changed from original manager: canSelect false, existingManagerId 20, own leader 10. They want when editing a registered event, the "gestor responsável" remains changed to own leader? New spec default? In updating by a member, apply currently keeps existingManager. If "original registrar" changed teams/new superior, default leader should maybe switch? The template now defaults to defs manager which currently at build= ownLeader — but payload manager may not come from request because select disabled. So edit leaves old manager even if superior changed. No definite. Potential duplicate: The disabled select field with `required` though value set; works. We should not over-index. final list with moderate. Actually I should consider an unquestionably problematic part: removal of previous ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR from `canApproveSsmaOccurrence` and insertion ROLE_TENANT. In security config if ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR has role_hierarchy ROLE_MANAGER then granted still true. Search needed. Comment says that bug fix decided in align meeting. So shouldn't flag as regression but verify role configured as approver lists and UI. If company has `config approver_ids` empty and gestor admin previously implicit could approve; with new behavior nobody approves; but maybe companies had to configure from prior? We can flag as risk medium needs operating validation that at least one approver configured per company; no migration inserted. Will produce low or medium, but probably high business risk if all approvals grind to a halt in companies that relied on the implicit bypass. Since meeting comment "gestor administrativo se não tiver configurado, nem aparece" explicitly desired, and bugs are aware. So product wants. But absence of data migration entails immediate lock for Such-specific companies. Since those companies have previous approval pattern with tag, a deployment stops them; no migration adds approver configs. This is meaningful impact; could be flagged as a rollout concern. I'll include as low-medium with recommendation to check operational impact; verify list of approver ids function and optional migration. For review plan structure, under each issue can include severity & description precise and tool lines. We need not resolve. Let's research about method existence: `getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds`, `getSsmaPreventionAreaScope`. Use code_search for declaration and semantics; e.g. occurrences with area restricted also team filter may be set by previous? We invoke code search on `function getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds`. Need target: For applySsmaEventManagerAssignment actual enforcement only `teams scope` but not area; if the same functions returns team filter ids for area scope? Suppose `getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds` returns the team scope associated with the viewer — for area-gestor perhaps returns null? But in modal picker at 9139 area derived separately, area may matter even when team filter null. Then area managers not constrained in assignment; included issue. Another real bug in `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser`: Adds events `createdById = userId` regardless of their `manager_id` or area team. It then checks `existing['e'.$id]` only for `is_ssma_event` rows with numeric ids 'e'. if same event already present with different prefix? fine. Then after append may return rows matched even beyond occurrence area scope; but own. Potential duplicate list when event already exists via base query (created_by_member_id?): existing check uses id prefix and only if `is_ssma_event` truthy. If base row is flash/occurrence old key format? no. Potential sorting mismatched: appended after list without re-sorting; list subsequent sections maybe sort separately? For a viewer, appended events appear at end not in chronological order, but after filter code then actions pass sorted? maybe not sorted until later? not know. low. Now a severe correctness in occurrence_map: `created_by_member_id` in row mapping is call before Company set? `$e->getCompany()` could be null? The mapping resolve receives maybe null Company; method takes Company, from prior loaded $company, but if getCompany null then method typed Company and nullable argument; not diff? not resolved. unchanged usage creates resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId($e->getCompany(),...). Signature in class takes Company $company type must be non-null; if event company always set. okay. Let's also inspect potentially breaking type with array filter `static` capture viewer member; before closure no access but now to $viewerMemberIdForCreated it uses getCurrentCompanyMember query inside else-if every request but only that branch for supervisor no scope? performance. Then area filter with manager scope: occurrenceTeamFilter? The removed lines merging if gestoresForEventModal empty with `allMembers` vs allMembersForEventPeople. New options list leaves no hierarchy empty but reuses occurrence. Optimal final issues 6: 1. high — Sem validação/servidor pessoas no escopo after removing & people record scope: * additional tool calls as said. 2. medium — Necessidade de um superior "líder imediato" cria bloqueio universal & possible. Plus no fallback. ask doc to see README mention intended. code_search 'superior' build function? We can verify analogous prior code. 3. medium — Escopo de área ausente para escolha valida no assignment; manager can cross area. 4. medium — PERF e cache new lookup repeated. 5. low — standalone tests duplicate (not real integration), and missing test of changed authorization decision in endpoint. This matches user rules "comportamento mudou sem teste novo" flagged. 6. low — canApprove removal implicit approvers might need migration/config check (business risk) and role hierarchy roles. severity low or medium? Since decision deliberate new, deployment can halt approvals where config list not updated. I'd better mention as medium with verify search to ensure allowed role/config function includes a way to confirm migration? As issue maybe “needs to verify companies...” Given all "do not invent" line, candidate plausible. Template related: potential inconsistent display when creator not among member_by_id (fallback shows manager as "responsável pelo cadastro" mislabel). Low. Now formatting: Summary, Issues list each severity label in lower-case [high]; Description covering location/problem/impact; lines. Each with tool arguments: For Issue1 → code_search 'As pessoas envolvidas devem pertencer' — confirm any other server-side validation remains for involved people. → code_search 'allMembersForEventPeople' — confirm template actually uses for options and scope removal means outside-team people selectable → file_read_diff templates...? partial modal used remote param via ajax search; involved people search may call endpoint with 'people_scope'? Perhaps code_search function names. Issue2 → code_search 'Informe o gestor responsável' — find validators and their paths for create update. → code_search 'resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId|applySsmaEventManagerAssignment' to map check occurrence any scenario where user no superior. Issue3 → code_search 'function getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds' — see scopes etc. → code_search 'function getSsmaPreventionAreaScope' + scope isRestricted paths. Issue4 → code_search 'resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId' call sites count mapping line. Issue5 (no need), test code is present standalone; run maybe not possible via these tools; but code_search of CI config? file_find phpunit? Standalone is not integrated, we can call file_find for composer/phpunit scripts. or describe guide. Issue6: → code_search 'ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR' security files for role hierarchy? code_search search `role_hierarchy` whole cgb maybe. → code_search 'canApproveSsmaOccurrence' call sites to ensure UI uses same gating consistently (occurrence_view controller & approval modal) verifying button. Also low: Twig view path: created_by_member_id may refer to member id while member_by_id keys may be user id... In old template `member_' ~ occurrence.created_by_id` where old arrays likely memberID column labeled created_by_id? In controller map currently has both keys: after diff template now prefer created_by_member_id; risk when member map key uses getUser? We need run a code search for `member_by_id` setup in the occurrence_view? It's in same template earlier. Not visible in given diff context lines? likely from same outer file. Could search file by using code_search term "member_by_id". Include candidate medium to low. Map relation maybe set from members loaded from dashboard. Given scope file is one twig, we can allow vulnerability by query. Okay, composing now with *Summary* line first in Portuguese. Issue list ordered severity: high then several medium then low. Make description with location (exact function/line region), type of issue and likely impact, with plain style (no leading jargon before first phrase; rule for messages is about actual comments not plan? Let's avoid heavy jargon) Write: Summary: A atualização centraliza o "gestor responsável" de ROS/eventos no líder imediato do cadastro, restringe o seletor/validação a líderes no escopo do usuário, garante que o criador enxergue eventos próprios fora do recorte de equipe, e remove o bypass que permitia a Gestor Administrador e ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR validar ocorrências sem estar na lista de aprovadores; inclui suporte no modal e teste isolado. Issues 1. [high] Remoção da checagem... (desc). Tool lines. 2. [medium] Novo campo exige líder imediato sem fallback... 3. [medium] Validação server-side... e área. 4. [medium] canApprove... withdrawal from implicit approver may block all approvals until settings updated... 5. [medium/low?] N+1 creator resolution/performance... 6. [low] Standalone... Let's respect continuous numbering sorted by severity high→med→low. All medium grouped arbitrary. Let's craft each concise but complete. Note: our instruction "Tool calls planned for same issue each appears one line." use `→ file_read_diff`? not required. Don't need every issue could include more than one tool. Now write in pt-BR. Ensure output only that plain text. Also no heading lines starting #. Ensure Summary then Issues. Let's produce output. Wait careful: tool name must be one of code_search/file_read_diff/file_find (no file_read). So code_search. Add fallback path in code_search patterns. Now final text.
Summary: A atualização reescreve a regra de "gestor responsável" de ROS/Eventos para usar o líder imediato (campo superior do cadastro de membros), restringe o seletor de gestores ao escopo de equipe/área do usuário, garante que o criador continue vendo eventos próprios fora do recorte, remove o bypass que permitia a Gestor Administrador e ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR validar ocorrências sem estar na lista de aprovadores, e ajusta o modal e a view de ocorrência para exibir "Responsável pelo cadastro" e "Gestor responsável" separadamente. Também adiciona cache de resolução de membro e um teste isolado que replica as funções de atribuição. Issues 1. [high] Na validação de submissão de ROS/Evento foi removida a checagem que garantia que as pessoas envolvidas pertencessem ao escopo de equipes do usuário, e no carregamento do modal também foram removidos os filtros que reduziam a lista de pessoas possíveis (`allMembersForEventPeople`) às equipes/área do usuário. Com isso um supervisor/gestor de equipe pode incluir no registro pessoas que estão fora da sua área de responsabilidade, o que enfraquece o isolamento por escopo de equipe/área previsto nas regras de permissão. → code_search 'As pessoas envolvidas devem pertencer' — confirmar se existe outra validação server-side para people_ids/person_id que substitua a removida. → code_search 'allMembersForEventPeople' — verificar em quais pontos do template/controller essa lista alimenta o seletor de pessoas e se ela agora contém membros fora do escopo. 2. [high] A nova regra de atribuição (`applySsmaEventManagerAssignment` + validação do gestor) exige que o campo manager_id seja o líder imediato de alguém (superior preenchido no cadastro) ou o próprio líder imediato do usuário. Em estruturas sem hierarquia de "superior" preenchida (ex.: empresa pequena, gestor no topo da cadeia, ou cadastro que usa apenas equipes), o usuário não tem líder imediato nem consegue selecionar ninguém — a lista fica vazia e/ou a submissão é recusada com a mensagem de gestor obrigatório. Antes havia fallback que incluía os membros da empresa/g stores no seletor e, no ROS de pessoa física, o próprio relator era usado como gestor. Isso pode bloquear completamente o registro de ROS/Eventos para esses usuários. → code_search 'Informe o gestor responsável' — mapear os validadores de criação/edição que rejeitam manager_id ausente/zerado e confirmar o caminho de erro para usuário sem superior. → code_search 'resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId|collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds' — verificar se existe algum tratamento para membro sem superior e se a regra de negócio documentada prevê esse caso. 3. [medium] Em `applySsmaEventManagerAssignment` a restrição do gestor escolhido usa apenas `getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds`, ignorando a restrição de área de `getSsmaPreventionAreaScope` que é aplicada no seletor de membros (picker) e na construção das opções do modal. Um gestor de área ou gestor com escopo de área restrito pode, via request manipulado, gravar um gestor responsável fora da sua área, divergindo do escopo aplicado na interface. → code_search 'function getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds' — verificar se, para gestor de área, esse método já devolve restrição ou retorna null (o que deixaria a atribuição sem barreira de área). → code_search 'function getSsmaPreventionAreaScope' — confirmar o comportamento `isRestricted()` e comparar com o intersection feito no picker e em `buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions`. 4. [medium] A alteração em `canApproveSsmaOccurrence` removeu o bypass automático por tag `memberIsSsmaGestorAdministrador` e por `ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR`, deixando a aprovação dependente exclusivamente da lista configurada de aprovadores. Se alguma empresa dependia do bypass implícito e não possui a lista preenchida (ou possui apenas um Gestor Administrador como aprovador de fato), nenhum usuário conseguirá validar ocorrências após o deploy — não há migração de dados inserindo os antigos aprovadores na configuração. → code_search 'canApproveSsmaOccurrence' — mapear todos os pontos (controller, template, JS) que usam esse guard, garantindo que a UI de "Validar ocorrência" fique consistente com a nova regra. → code_search 'ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR|role_hierarchy' — verificar a hierarquia de roles no security.yaml e se ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR ainda concede alguma das roles aceitas (ROLE_MANAGER/ROLE_TENANT), evitando regressão não intencional. 5. [medium] A inclusão de `created_by_member_id` no mapeamento de ocorrências e o fallback de gestor (`enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback`) disparam `resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId` (uma consulta por usuário não cacheado) e `entityManager->find(CompanyMembers)` por linha sem manager_id. Em listagens grandes com muitos criadores distintos, isso se torna N+1 no carregamento do dashboard; o cache criado mitiga apenas repetições do mesmo par empresa/usuário dentro da mesma request. → code_search 'resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId' — contar os novos pontos de chamada no fluxo de listagem e confirmar se há caminho sem cache prévio. → code_search 'enrichOccurrenceManagerFields|mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow' — verificar em que ponto das listas essas funções rodam e o volume típico de linhas processadas. 6. [medium] Em `occurrence_view.html.twig` a nova seção "Responsável pelo cadastro" prioriza `created_by_member_id` (id do CompanyMembers), mas o mapa `member_by_id` que alimenta o template pode estar indexado por chave diferente (dependendo da origem dos dados); quando o criador não é encontrado no mapa, o fallback exibe o gestor como responsável pelo cadastro, o que pode rotular incorretamente quem registrou o evento e ocultar o criador real na view. → code_search "member_by_id\[|member_by_id =" — confirmar como as chaves de `member_by_id` são montadas no template/controller e se `member_<created_by_member_id>` resolve corretamente. → code_search "'member_' ~ created_by" — comparar com o padrão usado antes da mudança e verificar compatibilidade com os dados antigos (created_by_id de usuário sem vínculo resolvido). 7. [low] O teste adicionado (`ssma_event_manager_leader_rule_standalone.php`) apenas duplica, em funções isoladas, a lógica de `buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions`/`applySsmaEventManagerAssignment`; ele não passa pelo controller nem pela validação real dos endpoints de criação/edição de evento, então não pega regressões de autorização ou de integração (como a perda da checagem de pessoas envolvidas mencionada na issue 1). A PR altera regra de permissão sem teste funcional cobrindo o fluxo completo. → file_find 'phpunit' — verificar se existe suíte/rota de teste funcional onde esse cenário deveria ser exercitado via endpoint real. → code_search 'forceSsmaRosReporterForPlainMember|applySsmaEventManagerAssignment' — localizar chamadas reais nos endpoints para indicar o ponto exato onde um teste de integração deveria ser escrito.

main_task

Request #1 deepseek-v4-flash P:28.68K C:452 CR:2.69K CW:0 4512ms
Reasoning
Let me start by understanding the changes in the review group. The main file is `src/Controller/SsmaController.php` with several changes about SSMA events and "gestor responsável" (responsible manager) rule. Let me analyze the issues in the review plan. Let me look at the code to confirm issues. Key areas: 1. Removed validation for people involved belonging to user's teams (people_ids/person_id). In validateSsmaEventModal (function around line 10424), the removed code included validation of peopleIds belonging to allowedMembers. Now removed. Need to check if there is another server-side validation of people ids. 2. New rule requires manager_id to be leader immediate of someone or own leader. Could block registration where hierarchy not filled. 3. applySsmaEventManagerAssignment restrict uses only team filter ids not area scope. 4. canApproveSsmaOccurrence removal of bypass. 5. N+1 queries with resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId and entityManager->find. 6. Template member_by_id indexing. 7. Test only standalone helpers. Let me dig into the controller around changed areas and related methods. Let me read the relevant sections of SsmaController.php. Let me start with reading the area around the validate function (lines ~10400-10460) and check where it's called, and what validators exist. Let me do searches and reads in parallel.
Tool Calls (3)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 10380, "end_line": 10470}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 10380-10470
10380|
10381|    /**
10382|     * @param array<string, mixed> $data Payload já normalizado ({@see normalizeSsmaEventPayload}).
10383|     */
10384|    private function validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope(array $data, Company $company, User $user): ?string
10385|    {
10386|        $scope = $this->getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds($company, $user);
10387|        if ($scope === null) {
10388|            return null;
10389|        }
10390|
10391|        $details = $data['details'] ?? [];
10392|        if (!is_array($details)) {
10393|            $details = [];
10394|        }
10395|
10396|        if ($scope === []) {
10397|            // Técnico especialista SSMA (sem equipe no produto): não valida payload por equipe.
10398|            // O acesso ao evento já ?? validado por isSsmaEventVisibleUnderOccurrenceTeamDashboardScope
10399|            // e canCompleteSsmaTechnicalType antes dessa chamada, garantindo que só acessa seu tipo.
10400|            try {
10401|                $member = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
10402|                if ($member) {
10403|                    $techLinks = $this->entityManager
10404|                        ->getRepository(SsmaPermissionTagMember::class)
10405|                        ->findBy(['companyMember' => $member]);
10406|                    if (!empty($techLinks)) {
10407|                        return null;
10408|                    }
10409|                }
10410|            } catch (\Throwable) {
10411|            }
10412|
10413|            return 'Seu perfil não está vinculado a nenhuma equipe; não ? possível registrar ocorrências.';
10414|        }
10415|
10416|        $teamId = (int) ($details['team_id'] ?? 0);
10417|        if ($teamId <= 0 || !in_array($teamId, $scope, true)) {
10418|            return 'A equipe informada não está disponível para o seu perfil.';
10419|        }
10420|
10421|        $allowedMembers = $this->collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams($company, $scope);
10422|
10423|        $managerId = (int) ($details['manager_id'] ?? 0);
10424|        if ($managerId <= 0) {
10425|            return 'Informe o gestor responsável.';
10426|        }
10427|        $leaderIds = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company);
10428|        $ownLeaderId = $this->resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId($company, $user);
10429|        $managerAllowed = isset($leaderIds[$managerId]) && isset($allowedMembers[$managerId]);
10430|        if ($ownLeaderId !== null && $ownLeaderId === $managerId) {
10431|            $managerAllowed = true;
10432|        }
10433|        if (!$managerAllowed) {
10434|            return 'O gestor responsável precisa ser líder imediato de alguém e pertencer ao seu escopo de equipe/área.';
10435|        }
10436|
10437|        return null;
10438|    }
10439|
10440|    /**
10441|     * team_limitation na inspeção: a equipe é o recorte. Sem equipe, ou equipe fora do cadastro
10442|     * do perfil, a gravação é recusada. area_limitation sozinha não passa por aqui.
10443|     *
10444|     * @param array<string, mixed> $data
10445|     */
10446|    private function validateInspectionPayloadAgainstTeamScope(
10447|        array $data,
10448|        ?int $resolvedTeamId,
10449|        Company $company,
10450|        User $user,
10451|    ): ?string {
10452|        $scope = $this->getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds($company, $user);
10453|        if ($scope === null) {
10454|            return null;
10455|        }
10456|
10457|        if ($scope === []) {
10458|            try {
10459|                $member = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
10460|                if ($member) {
10461|                    $techLinks = $this->entityManager
10462|                        ->getRepository(SsmaPermissionTagMember::class)
10463|                        ->findBy(['companyMember' => $member]);
10464|                    if (!empty($techLinks)) {
10465|                        return null;
10466|                    }
10467|                }
10468|            } catch (\Throwable) {
10469|            }
10470|
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "As pessoas envolvidas devem pertencer"}
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "allMembersForEventPeople"}
File: docs/ssma/engineering/ssma-permissoes-ocorrencia-auditoria-2026-09.md
Match lines: 3
138|Local: bloco de montagem de `allMembersForEventPeople` / `gestoresForEventModal` (~linhas
142|- `allMembersForEventPeople` (usado no seletor de "pessoas envolvidas"/"testemunhas") era
155|- `allMembersForEventPeople` passou a usar sempre `$allMembers` (empresa toda), tanto no bloco de

File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 8
13179|        $allMembersForEventPeople = $allMembers;
13547|                ($occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== null && $allMembersForEventPeople !== [])
13550|                ? $allMembersForEventPeople
13601|            $allMembersForEventPeople = $this->filterSsmaMembersToReferencedForDetail(
13602|                $allMembersForEventPeople,
13610|        $allMembersForEventPeople = $this->sortSsmaMemberRowsByName($allMembersForEventPeople);
13671|                'all_members_for_event_people' => $allMembersForEventPeople,
13672|                'ssma_modal_members' => $allMembersForEventPeople,

Request #2 deepseek-v4-flash P:30.61K C:214 CR:29.06K CW:0 2415ms
Reasoning
Let me look at the docs to understand intent and also the removed people validation. The removed code validated people involved belong to allowedMembers. Now only manager validated. Let me confirm that people_ids / person_id no longer validated against scope anywhere else. Let me read the area where validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope is called and check whether there are other validators checking people_ids. Also search for "validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope" callers. Let me also read the docs md to understand intent.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "docs/ssma/engineering/ssma-permissoes-ocorrencia-auditoria-2026-09.md"}
File: docs/ssma/engineering/ssma-permissoes-ocorrencia-auditoria-2026-09.md (Total lines: 266)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-266
1|# SSMA Ocorrência — Auditoria de Permissões (reunião 2026-09-03) e Correções
2|
3|## Fonte
4|
5|Transcrição integral da reunião de alinhamento de permissões SSMA, gravada em
6|`2026-09-03_16-28-32` (áudio "ao vivo" do Gustavo explicando o modelo de permissões produto a
7|produto, focado em Ocorrência). Este documento traduz essa explicação em regras técnicas,
8|audita o código atual do módulo de **Ocorrência** contra essas regras, e registra o que foi
9|corrigido agora vs. o que ainda está pendente.
10|
11|Escopo: **apenas SSMA Ocorrência** (registro, aprofundamento, descaracterização, aprovação,
12|listagem, botões, exportação, pickers de pessoas). Árvore de Causas, Prevenção Ativa, Plano de
13|Ação e Direito de Recusa foram mencionados na reunião mas ficam fora deste documento.
14|
15|## 1. Modelo de permissões — resumo executivo (Ocorrência)
16|
17|### 1.1 Tags estruturais (independem de SSMA)
18|
19|`Membro` (default) → `Supervisor de Equipe` / `Supervisor de Área` / `Supervisor` → `Gestor de
20|Equipe` / `Gestor de Área` / `Gestor Administrador`.
21|
22|- **Membro**: baseline. Só vê o que registrou, o que está relacionado a ele (envolvido/gestor
23|  responsável), ou o que pode aprofundar/aprovar por configuração.
24|- **Supervisor** (qualquer nível): ganha **visão** adicional (dados de outras pessoas, escopo
25|  por equipe/área/geral), mas **não ganha ação**. Continua sendo "Membro" para fins de registrar
26|  a própria ocorrência — a tag de supervisor nunca deve **remover** um botão que a matriz de
27|  configuração já concedeu ao colaborador.
28|- **Gestor** (qualquer nível): ganha visão **e ação** — vira equivalente a administrador dentro
29|  do escopo (equipe/área/todos). Sempre vê os 3 botões (+ROS, +Evento, Exportar planilha),
30|  sempre vê "Criar ação", "+Aprofundamento", "Árvore de causas" e o card de "Comitê" em qualquer
31|  ocorrência dentro do seu escopo — independentemente de estar listado como responsável,
32|  envolvido ou especialista.
33|- **Gestor Administrador**: único nível de gestor que vê o botão **Editar** ocorrência.
34|
35|### 1.2 Etapas do registro (fluxo transversal a todos os 5 tipos)
36|
37|1. **Informação geral** — quem registra depende da matriz de configuração (`Registro por tipo de
38|   ocorrência`), não da tag estrutural.
39|2. **Aprofundamento** — quem edita depende da listagem de especialistas por tipo (config).
40|3. **Validação** — quem aprova depende da listagem de "Aprovador de ocorrência" (config).
41|
42|Citação literal (transcrição, ~l.343-348):
43|
44|> "Um erro que estava rolando, que talvez tenha arrumado, mas que rolou... como tinha essa
45|> coisa do supervisor só ver e a pessoa tinha autorização para ROS, por exemplo, o que
46|> aconteceu é que sumiu com o botão... Nesse caso aqui a configuração do membro de fazer ROS ou
47|> evento ele tem prioridade, porque é o default membro."
48|
49|Citação literal (transcrição, ~l.196-202):
50|
51|> "elas vão ver o cardzinho, quando elas entram, tem um botãozinho de fazer a validação... se eu
52|> sou um aprovador, se eu estou naquela configuração, eu vou ver esse botão de validar
53|> ocorrência."
54|
55|Citação literal (transcrição, ~l.379-382 — nível de gestor não dá bypass de validação):
56|
57|> "Validar a ocorrência vai depender da configuração... Na configuração de validação, tem uma
58|> configuração exclusiva pra isso. O gestor administrativo se ele não tiver [configurado], nem
59|> aparece pra ele."
60|
61|Citação literal (transcrição, ~l.103-106 — pickers de envolvido/testemunha nunca são filtrados):
62|
63|> "Essa limitação não está associada a pessoas envolvidas e nem a testemunhas... que sempre
64|> aparece todo mundo. A possibilidade é eu poder colocar qualquer pessoa aqui."
65|
66|Citação literal (transcrição, ~l.100-104 — gestor responsável É filtrado por escopo do gestor):
67|
68|> "Gestor, ele vai poder fazer coisas que o administrador faz. Por exemplo, selecionar outras
69|> pessoas aqui dentro. Quais pessoas? Aí depende do meu nível de gestor. De equipe, só as
70|> pessoas que fazem parte da mesma equipe que eu faço. Se for [de área], só as pessoas que fazem
71|> parte da mesma estrutura organizacional que eu faço."
72|
73|## 2. Bugs encontrados e status
74|
75|| # | Bug | Severidade | Status |
76||---|-----|------------|--------|
77|| 1 | Supervisor com ROS/Evento habilitado na matriz podia perder o botão de registro | Alta (regressão confirmada em reunião) | **Corrigido** |
78|| 2 | `Gestor de Equipe`/`Gestor Administrador` aprovavam ocorrência sem estar na lista de "Aprovador de ocorrência" | Alta (bypass indevido de validação) | **Corrigido** |
79|| 3 | Picker de "pessoas envolvidas/testemunhas" era filtrado por equipe/área do supervisor/gestor (deveria sempre listar a empresa toda) | Média (funcional — impedia adicionar envolvidos fora da equipe) | **Corrigido** |
80|| 4 | Picker de "gestor responsável" listava tags SSMA / qualquer membro, em vez do líder imediato do organograma | Alta (regra Brenda 03/09/2026) | **Corrigido** |
81|| 4b | Eventos não apareciam para quem cadastrou (`created_by_id` é User ID; listagem comparava member ID) | Alta | **Corrigido** |
82|| 4c | Página de informações gerais mostrava Gestor responsável vazio ("apagado") | Alta | **Corrigido** |
83|| 5 | `Gestor de Equipe`/`Gestor de Área` não recebem bypass automático de "+Aprofundamento" (só `Gestor Administrador` recebe) | Média | Pendente — ver §4.1 |
84|| 6 | Gate de descaracterização (`applySsmaDescaracterPermissionGate`) não retorna 403; apenas remove dados silenciosamente | Média | Pendente — ver §3.2 |
85|| 7 | Listagem (`isOccurrenceVisibleToMember`) usa `if` sequenciais em vez de união explícita + "cap 500" antes do filtro de visibilidade | Alta (risco técnico) | Pendente — ver §3.3 |
86|| 8 | Comitê da árvore de causas: confirmar se card fica oculto para Supervisor (reunião diz que é exclusivo de Gestor) | A confirmar | Pendente — ver §3.4 |
87|
88|## 3. O que foi corrigido agora
89|
90|Arquivo único alterado: `src/Controller/SsmaController.php`.
91|
92|### 3.1 `canMemberRegisterOwnOccurrence()` — supervisor não bloqueia mais o próprio registro
93|
94|Local:
95|```11416:11431:src/Controller/SsmaController.php
96|    private function canMemberRegisterOwnOccurrence(?Company $company, ?User $user): bool
97|    {
98|        ...
99|    }
100|```
101|
102|**Antes**: havia um `if ($this->isSsmaViewer()) { return false; }` que zerava a permissão de
103|registro para qualquer tag de Supervisor, mesmo quando a matriz (`ssma_occurrence_create_permission`)
104|liberava ROS/Evento para aquele colaborador especificamente. Isso reproduz exatamente o bug
105|relatado na reunião ("sumiu com o botão").
106|
107|**Depois**: removido o bloqueio por `isSsmaViewer()`. A função volta a decidir apenas se existe
108|vínculo de `CompanyMembers` — o tipo específico liberado continua 100% decidido pela matriz em
109|`canCreateSsmaOccurrenceType()` / `SsmaOccurrenceCreatePermissionService::resolveAllowedCreateTypes()`,
110|que já tinha essa lógica correta e não foi alterada.
111|
112|### 3.2 `canApproveSsmaOccurrence()` — validação exige estar na lista de aprovadores
113|
114|Local:
115|```11194:11220:src/Controller/SsmaController.php
116|    private function canApproveSsmaOccurrence(?Company $company, ?User $user): bool
117|    {
118|        ...
119|    }
120|```
121|
122|**Antes**: bypassava automaticamente para `ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR` e para qualquer membro com tag
123|`Gestor Administrador` (`memberIsSsmaGestorAdministrador()`), **sem checar**
124|`getFlashReportApproverIds()`.
125|
126|**Depois**: mantido apenas o bypass de plataforma/tenant (`ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN`, `ROLE_MANAGER`,
127|`ROLE_TENANT` — mesmo padrão usado em `canEditOccurrenceDetail()`). Removidos os bypasses de
128|`ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR` e de `Gestor Administrador`: agora **todo mundo**, inclusive Gestor
129|Administrador, só vê "Validar ocorrência" se o `CompanyMembers::id` estiver na lista configurada
130|em Configurações → Aprovador de ocorrência — exatamente como a reunião descreve.
131|
132|Consumidores de `can_approve_occurrence` no Twig (`occurrence_view.html.twig`, linhas ~718,
133|~806, ~3069) já usam essa função via a variável do controller, então o fix se propaga sem
134|necessidade de tocar em template.
135|
136|### 3.3 Pickers do modal de evento — escopo invertido corrigido
137|
138|Local: bloco de montagem de `allMembersForEventPeople` / `gestoresForEventModal` (~linhas
139|12840-12900 de `SsmaController.php`, dentro do método que monta a view de ocorrências).
140|
141|**Antes**:
142|- `allMembersForEventPeople` (usado no seletor de "pessoas envolvidas"/"testemunhas") era
143|  filtrado pela equipe/área do supervisor/gestor logado.
144|- `gestoresForEventModal` (usado no seletor de "gestor responsável") **ignorava** esse filtro de
145|  propósito, com o comentário explícito "escopo da empresa, não só membros da equipe do
146|  supervisor".
147|
148|Isso é o **inverso exato** do que a reunião define duas vezes (na especificação escrita do
149|usuário e nesta transcrição de áudio):
150|
151|- Envolvido/testemunha → nunca filtra, sempre lista todo mundo.
152|- Gestor responsável → filtra pelo escopo (equipe/área) de quem está montando o registro.
153|
154|**Depois**:
155|- `allMembersForEventPeople` passou a usar sempre `$allMembers` (empresa toda), tanto no bloco de
156|  escopo de equipe quanto no de área.
157|- `gestoresForEventModal` passou a receber o mapa de membros do escopo
158|  (`collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams()` / `$areaScope->allowedMemberIds()`) em vez
159|  de `null`, via `buildSsmaEventModalGestores(...)`. Essa função já tratava corretamente o caso
160|  de o próprio usuário logado poder sempre se selecionar mesmo fora do escopo (auto-seleção não
161|  é afetada pelo fix).
162|
163|Teste automatizado relacionado (`tests/Ssma/ssma_event_modal_scope_standalone.php`) continua
164|passando (8/8) — ele cobre a lógica de "quando aplicar o filtro no Twig", que não foi alterada;
165|o fix atual é sobre **qual** lista é usada como base do filtro em cada picker.
166|
167|### 3.4 Atualização Brenda 03/09/2026 — Gestor responsável = líder imediato
168|
169|Fonte: mensagem da Brenda + áudio complementar. Campo `Responsável` do cadastro de colaborador
170|(`templates/company/members_v2.html.twig`, `#superior` → `CompanyMembers.superior`).
171|
172|Regras implementadas:
173|
174|1. **Responsável pelo cadastro** = login que iniciou o registro (`SsmaEvent.createdById` =
175|   User ID). Não aparece no off-canvas. Aparece só nas informações gerais do detalhe
176|   (`occurrence_view.html.twig`).
177|2. **Gestor responsável** = líder imediato (`getSuperior()`) de quem está cadastrando.
178|   Membro/supervisor vê o campo preenchido e **não edita**. Gestor (equipe/área/administrador)
179|   pode trocar.
180|3. Lista do select, quando Gestor edita: interseção de (3.1) pessoas que são superior de
181|   alguém **e** (3.2) pessoas do escopo de equipe/área do gestor. O próprio líder de quem está
182|   logado sempre entra, para o default não ficar vazio.
183|4. **Envolvidos e testemunhas** = qualquer membro (já corrigido na rodada anterior).
184|5. **Responsável da área** = local da ocorrência (`enrichOccurrenceAreaResponsible`) — só
185|   display, sem campo no off-canvas.
186|
187|Bugs que essa regra fechou:
188|
189|- Evento não aparecia para quem cadastrou: `isOccurrenceVisibleToMember` agora resolve
190|  `created_by_id` (User) → `created_by_member_id` e a listagem anexa os eventos do login.
191|- Campo "apagado" no detalhe: se `manager_id` estiver vazio, o display cai no líder imediato
192|  de quem cadastrou (`enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback`).
193|
194|## 4. Bugs pendentes (não corrigidos nesta rodada — motivo e recomendação)
195|
196|### 4.1 Aprofundamento — bypass de Gestor de Equipe/Área
197|
198|Reunião (~l.369-373): "criar ação, aprofundamento, árvore de causas, detalhes do comitê... são
199|exclusivos de gestor. Aí não importa o nível, se ele teve acesso a essa ocorrência, ele vai
200|poder ver isso aqui." Hoje `canAccessSsmaEventAprofundamento()` só dá bypass para
201|`isSsmaAprofundamentoAdmin` (que resolve para `Gestor Administrador`); `Gestor de Equipe` e
202|`Gestor de Área` continuam dependendo de estar na lista de especialistas por tipo.
203|
204|**Por que não corrigi agora**: implementar corretamente exige resolver, para a ocorrência
205|específica, se ela pertence à equipe/área do gestor (o dado de equipe/área da ocorrência não é
206|uniforme entre os 5 tipos e nem sempre está disponível no mesmo campo de `details`). Como a
207|reunião reforça que o erro mais grave possível é "membro qualquer poder ver dados dos outros",
208|prefiro **não** ampliar esse acesso sem antes mapear com precisão de onde vem `team_id`/área em
209|cada tipo de ocorrência, para não conceder acesso além do escopo real do gestor.
210|
211|**Próximo passo sugerido**: reaproveitar a mesma resolução de equipe/área já usada no filtro de
212|listagem (`getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds` / `SsmaAreaLimitationScope`) para decidir,
213|por ocorrência, se o gestor de equipe/área tem escopo sobre ela, e então liberar o bypass de
214|aprofundamento nesse caso.
215|
216|### 4.2 Gate de descaracterização não retorna 403
217|
218|`applySsmaDescaracterPermissionGate()` silenciosamente remove/ignora os campos de
219|descaracterização quando o membro não tem permissão, em vez de rejeitar a requisição com 403.
220|Funcionalmente "não deixa passar", mas mascara o erro para quem está integrando/testando e
221|diverge do padrão usado no resto do controller (outros gates retornam 403 explícito).
222|
223|**Por que não corrigi agora**: mudar de "ignora silenciosamente" para "403 explícito" é uma
224|mudança de contrato de API que pode impactar o JS do modal (que hoje pode não estar preparado
225|para tratar um 403 nesse endpoint sem quebrar o fluxo de salvar rascunho). Requer checar
226|`_modal_event.html.twig` / JS do modal antes de mudar o código de resposta.
227|
228|### 4.3 Listagem — união vs `if`s sequenciais + cap 500
229|
230|Regra unificada da reunião/spec do usuário: visível se (visão estrutural) OU (criador, gestor
231|responsável, envolvido, responsável/validador de ação) OU (especialista do tipo com
232|aprofundamento disponível) OU (aprovador com ocorrência pronta para validação) — avaliada como
233|união **antes** da paginação.
234|
235|**Por que não corrigi agora**: é a mudança de maior risco e maior escopo (toca
236|`isOccurrenceVisibleToMember`, `filterOccurrencesForMember` e `loadOccurrences`, incluindo a
237|lógica de "cap 500 + filtro PHP"), e uma implementação apressada pode tanto **esconder**
238|ocorrências que deveriam aparecer (ex.: aprovador não vendo o card pronto para validar) quanto
239|**expor** ocorrências indevidamente — o oposto do risco #1 mencionado pela reunião. Recomendo
240|tratar como item isolado, com testes de regressão dedicados por perfil antes de subir.
241|
242|### 4.4 Card "Comitê" — confirmar ocultação para Supervisor
243|
244|Reunião (~l.396-404): card de "Comitê" (árvore de causas) na página/dentro da ocorrência é
245|exclusivo de Gestor — oculto para Membro **e também para Supervisor** ("supervisor também
246|porque supervisor só vê"). Não localizei com certeza absoluta, nesta rodada, o ponto exato do
247|Twig/controller que renderiza esse card especificamente para auditá-lo em detalhe — fica como
248|item de verificação pontual antes de fechar o épico de Ocorrência.
249|
250|## 5. Testes executados
251|
252|```bash
253|php -l src/Controller/SsmaController.php
254|php tests/Ssma/ssma_event_modal_scope_standalone.php
255|php tests/Ssma/ssma_event_manager_leader_rule_standalone.php
256|php vendor/bin/phpunit tests/Ssma/SsmaPermissionsRegressionTest.php
257|```
258|
259|## 6. Recomendação de ordem para as próximas correções
260|
261|1. §4.3 Listagem (união + remover cap 500 do caminho crítico) — maior risco técnico documentado.
262|2. §4.1 Aprofundamento (bypass de Gestor de Equipe/Área) — depende de mapear equipe/área por
263|   tipo de ocorrência.
264|3. §4.2 Gate de descaracterização → 403 explícito — depende de ajuste no JS do modal.
265|4. §4.4 Confirmação pontual do card de Comitê.
266|
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 3
10384|    private function validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope(array $data, Company $company, User $user): ?string
26489|        $teamScopeErr = $this->validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope($data, $company, $user);
26718|        $teamScopeErr = $this->validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope($data, $company, $user);

Request #3 deepseek-v4-flash P:36.1K C:1.04K CR:30.72K CW:0 9481ms
Reasoning
The docs confirm intent: "Envolvido/testemunha → nunca filtra, sempre lista todo mundo." So removing people validation against the scope was intentional per the product meeting. The review-plan issue #1 says this weakens isolation, but docs explicitly state that involved/witnesses should never be filtered and anyone can be chosen. So issue 1 is NOT a bug — intentional. However, there is one nuance: the previous server-side validation returned an error if the person involved wasn't in the member's teams. Now, anyone can be added, consistent with the meeting rule. So I should not report this as a bug. Perhaps note? The instructions say focus on issues in newly added code and avoid commenting correct code. Since the doc explicitly states this is intended, I won't report issue #1. Now issue #2: A new manager rule requires leader immediate or own leader; in structures without hierarchy, submission could be refused. Let's examine the validation flow: validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope checks scope !== null (i.e., team filter ids set). For a member without superior, ownLeaderId null; managerId <= 0 → 'Informe o gestor responsável.'. This validation applies only when scope not null and not []. Actually it applies to members with team scope (e.g., supervisor/gestor de equipe with teams). Let's check: getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds returns scope for supervisors / team gestor? Need to understand what the scope means. If manager_id <=0 the validation returns error before leader check. But the requirement says ROS/Evento registration requires a "gestor responsável". Since manager is now defaulted to own leader id in applySsmaEventManagerAssignment, if ownLeaderId null, then for members who can't select (not canSelect), manager_id may remain unset. Then validation with team scope: managerId <=0 → 'Informe o gestor responsável.'. This could block registration for members without a superior. But that's only if the member also has a team filter scope (i.e., they're a supervisor of a team?). Actually getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds returns scope for whom? Let me read that function. Also consider the flow for plain members (no team scope): validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope returns null early (scope===null), so no manager validation. And applySsmaEventManagerAssignment for non-canSelect member without superior leaves manager_id unset (if no existing). Then event saved with manager_id null → but maybe that's acceptable? Then the view fallback resolves to the creator's superior; if none, manager remains empty and shows "—" (dash). So registration not blocked. OK. For supervisors (with team scope), validation requires manager. But applySsmaEventManagerAssignment would have set manager_id = ownLeaderId if exists. If a supervisor has no superior in hierarchy, then registration blocked. Hmm, but is it a likely real scenario? The rule is that "gestor responsável = líder imediato". If no superior configured... the member's own data missing. This is potentially blocking for a subset. But is this a real bug? Perhaps the intended behavior for members without superior is that the manager is left blank or self? Actually before the change, for plain member ROS, manager was the reporter themselves (forceSsmaRosReporterForPlainMember sets manager_id = memberId). Now removed, replaced by applySsmaEventManagerAssignment, which sets ownLeaderId, not self. So plain member ROS with no superior now has manager_id null; the docs 4c says the detail page falls back to the creator's superior for display; if there is none, the field appears as "—". Given product rule changed to manager = leader immediate, and if no superior exists... does product expect? Not sure. This is a product rule; the audit says "decisão de produto". Since we can't confirm whether company hierarchies always populated, flagging as medium maybe. But let's first check how the default manager for a member with no leader behaves when validation runs with team scope. A plain member isn't in team scope validation. Let me confirm getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds behavior to understand which users it returns non-null. Let me read around the relevant methods and lines.
Tool Calls (3)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "private function getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
10249|    private function getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds(?Company $company, ?User $user): ?array

code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "function getSsmaPreventionAreaScope"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
10306|    private function getSsmaPreventionAreaScope(?Company $company, ?User $user): SsmaPreventionAreaScope

code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "function collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
10355|    private function collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams(Company $company, array $teamIds): array

Request #4 deepseek-v4-flash P:37.3K C:104 CR:37.12K CW:0 1772ms
Reasoning
Let me read the region 10240-10400 to understand these functions.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 10240, "end_line": 10400}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 10240-10400
10240|     * - Tags **Gestor de Equipe** e **Supervisor de Equipe** no produto atual: escopo pelas equipes do
10241|     *   cadastro do membro (mesmo se `team_limitation` estiver incorreto na base).
10242|     * - Supervisor de Equipe (viewer) continua coberto por {@see getSsmaViewerTeamIds()} quando a tag
10243|     *   por produto não reflete team_limitation (legado).
10244|     * - Colaborador sem equipe no cadastro e sem ser Gestor Administrador no produto (ex.: tag "Supervisor"
10245|     *   com team_limitation = 0) → escopo vazio {@see []}, para não listar ocorrências alheias.
10246|     *
10247|     * @return int[]|null null = sem filtro por equipe nesta tela
10248|     */
10249|    private function getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds(?Company $company, ?User $user): ?array
10250|    {
10251|        if (!$company || !$user instanceof User) {
10252|            return null;
10253|        }
10254|
10255|        if ($this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN') || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER')) {
10256|            return null;
10257|        }
10258|
10259|        $member = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
10260|        if (!$member) {
10261|            return null;
10262|        }
10263|
10264|        $tag = $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($member);
10265|        // 'Supervisor' puro (sem "de Equipe") ?? supervisor global: sem restrição de equipe, igual ao Gestor Administrador.
10266|        if ($tag && in_array($tag->getName(), ['Gestor Administrador', 'Supervisor'], true)) {
10267|            return null;
10268|        }
10269|
10270|        $parsed = $this->parseCompanyMemberTeamIds($member);
10271|
10272|        if ($tag && in_array($tag->getName(), $this->ssmaTeamScopePermissionTagNames(), true)) {
10273|            return $parsed;
10274|        }
10275|
10276|        if ($tag && $tag->getTeamLimitation()) {
10277|            return $parsed;
10278|        }
10279|
10280|        $viewerTeams = $this->getSsmaViewerTeamIds();
10281|        if ($viewerTeams !== null) {
10282|            return $viewerTeams;
10283|        }
10284|
10285|        // Membro sem tag de supervisão/gestão SSMA (ex.: stakeholder via ocorrência) não deve
10286|        // ter filtro de equipe aplicado: retorna null para que filterOccurrencesForMember
10287|        // mostre apenas o conteúdo próprio. Retornar [] zeraria todos os dados antes disso.
10288|        if ($tag !== null && $parsed === []) {
10289|            if ($this->resolveCurrentUserTechnicalTypes($company, $user) !== []) {
10290|                return [];
10291|            }
10292|
10293|            return null;
10294|        }
10295|
10296|        return null;
10297|    }
10298|
10299|    /**
10300|     * Recorte de área do usuário logado na Prevenção Ativa.
10301|     *
10302|     * Fonte única para listagem, busca, detalhe e gravação: um escopo não restrito libera tudo,
10303|     * um escopo restrito com conjunto vazio nega tudo. Não existe estado intermediário em que
10304|     * a ausência de área cadastrada remova o filtro.
10305|     */
10306|    private function getSsmaPreventionAreaScope(?Company $company, ?User $user): SsmaPreventionAreaScope
10307|    {
10308|        if (!$company || !$user instanceof User) {
10309|            return SsmaPreventionAreaScope::unrestricted();
10310|        }
10311|
10312|        $isPlatformAdmin = $this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN') || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER');
10313|        $member = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
10314|        $tag = $member ? $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($member, 'ssma-prevention') : null;
10315|
10316|        return $this->ssmaPreventionAreaAuthorization
10317|            ->resolveScope($company, $member, $tag, $isPlatformAdmin);
10318|    }
10319|
10320|    /**
10321|     * @return list<int>
10322|     */
10323|    private function parseCompanyMemberAreaIds(CompanyMembers $member): array
10324|    {
10325|        return $this->ssmaPreventionAreaAuthorization->memberAreaIds($member);
10326|    }
10327|
10328|    /**
10329|     * Guarda de leitura de inspeção por ID: quem não vê na listagem também não abre pelo ID.
10330|     */
10331|    private function canViewInspectionUnderAreaScope(SsmaInspection $inspection, ?Company $company, ?User $user): bool
10332|    {
10333|        return $this->ssmaPreventionAreaAuthorization->canViewInspection(
10334|            $this->getSsmaPreventionAreaScope($company, $user),
10335|            $inspection
10336|        );
10337|    }
10338|
10339|    /**
10340|     * Guarda de leitura de abordagem por ID: mesmo critério da listagem (observador no recorte).
10341|     */
10342|    private function canViewAbordagemUnderAreaScope(SsmaAbordagem $abordagem, ?Company $company, ?User $user): bool
10343|    {
10344|        return $this->ssmaPreventionAreaAuthorization->canViewAbordagem(
10345|            $this->getSsmaPreventionAreaScope($company, $user),
10346|            $abordagem
10347|        );
10348|    }
10349|
10350|    /**
10351|     * @param int[] $teamIds
10352|     *
10353|     * @return array<int, true>
10354|     */
10355|    private function collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams(Company $company, array $teamIds): array
10356|    {
10357|        if ($teamIds === []) {
10358|            return [];
10359|        }
10360|
10361|        $teamIdStr = array_map('strval', $teamIds);
10362|        $set = [];
10363|        $members = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)
10364|            ->findBy(['company' => $company, 'isRemoved' => 0]);
10365|        foreach ($members as $m) {
10366|            $raw = $m->getTeams() ?? '';
10367|            if ($raw === '') {
10368|                continue;
10369|            }
10370|            foreach (array_map('trim', explode(',', $raw)) as $t) {
10371|                if ($t !== '' && in_array((string) $t, $teamIdStr, true)) {
10372|                    $set[(int) $m->getId()] = true;
10373|                    break;
10374|                }
10375|            }
10376|        }
10377|
10378|        return $set;
10379|    }
10380|
10381|    /**
10382|     * @param array<string, mixed> $data Payload já normalizado ({@see normalizeSsmaEventPayload}).
10383|     */
10384|    private function validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope(array $data, Company $company, User $user): ?string
10385|    {
10386|        $scope = $this->getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds($company, $user);
10387|        if ($scope === null) {
10388|            return null;
10389|        }
10390|
10391|        $details = $data['details'] ?? [];
10392|        if (!is_array($details)) {
10393|            $details = [];
10394|        }
10395|
10396|        if ($scope === []) {
10397|            // Técnico especialista SSMA (sem equipe no produto): não valida payload por equipe.
10398|            // O acesso ao evento já ?? validado por isSsmaEventVisibleUnderOccurrenceTeamDashboardScope
10399|            // e canCompleteSsmaTechnicalType antes dessa chamada, garantindo que só acessa seu tipo.
10400|            try {
Request #5 deepseek-v4-flash P:39.52K C:2.06K CR:37.38K CW:0 17768ms
Reasoning
Now let me understand validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope scope. Members without a team-scope tag (plain members) → return null. So the manager validation at 10416-10435 applies only to users with a team scope: team supervisors and team gestors and area? Wait area-scope gestor would use getSsmaPreventionAreaScope? Actually getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds handles only team tags; 'Gestor de Área' not in ssmaTeamScopePermissionTagNames likely. Let me check ssmaTeamScopePermissionTagNames. Anyway, key concern: new validation requires manager to be in leaderIds AND in allowedMembers(team scope) OR own leader. This validation runs when a member with team scope (e.g., a supervisor, or a team gestor) registers an event. Their own leader (superior) must be in their own scope? Actually ownLeaderId gets added to allowed if in team members map... Let's check: allowedMembers = collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams(company, scope). managerAllowed = isset(leaderIds[managerId]) && isset(allowedMembers[managerId]). ownLeader override only when ownLeaderId === managerId. So if a supervisor (scope team A) registers own event; default manager = own superior. If their superior is in team A, fine. If their superior is NOT in the supervisor's team list (i.e., own leader outside scope of teams they supervise), then applySsmaEventManagerAssignment only includes ownLeader in the allowed list for manager options when canSelect. Wait in applySsmaEventManagerAssignment, when !$canSelect, it sets manager_id = existing or ownLeaderId. So default = ownLeader even if not in their team scope. But validation on submission requires ownLeaderId === managerId → managerAllowed = true via own-leader override. OK so validation includes own leader override. Good. But when the member has no superior at all (ownLeaderId null), and they cannot select (plain supervisor not gestor), applySsmaEventManagerAssignment leaves manager_id unset (if not editing). Then validation managerId <= 0 → error 'Informe o gestor responsável.'. For a plain member (no team scope), validate returns null (early) because scope null. For a supervisor with team scope but no superior → error. How common is a supervisor with teams but no superior? In hierarchy, a supervisor typically reports to someone. But not always; some companies may not fill superior field for all. Hmm, given the product explicitly defines manager=leader immediate and it's a confirmed product rule with a dedicated meeting, likely scenario considered. But the possibility that no superior exists and the event is blocked should be checked against fallback behavior. Since applySsmaEventManagerAssignment cannot set anything (can't select). For supervisor with no superior → validation fails with 'Informe o gestor responsável.' (field is disabled but empty, select required...). Actually the disabled select would prevent user from submitting? Let's consider front-end: member/supervisor sees select disabled. If empty options? gestoresList may be empty (leader ids exist though). Hmm. Actually wait: for a plain member who is not gestor (cannot select), applySsmaEventManagerAssignment runs, manager defaults to ownLeaderId. In a hierarchy-less company where no one has a superior filled, leaderIds empty and ownLeader null → manager_id null → validate (scope null for plain member) returns null early → save proceeds with manager null. And detail fallback: createdByMember resolution; superior null → manager display empty. Given that this is product intent documented and probably acceptable to leave empty, I'm unsure this is a bug worth flagging. But issue #2's more concrete sub-case is that for ROS by a plain member, previously the manager was set to the member itself (reporter = self). Now manager = own superior. That is intended by product (leader immediate = the leader, not the reporter). Fine. I'll deprioritize issue 2 since it depends on missing hierarchy data which we cannot confirm, plus validation blocks only for users with team scope. Actually, wait: let me think again about the case where a plain member has a superior but the superior is NOT one who is the superior of someone else... Actually leaderIds = distinct superior ids across company. So if user's superior is set, that superior is a leader of at least this user. So ownLeaderId in leaderIds. So default manager passes validation when scope present. OK. What about a supervisor who registers an event for their team (they can do registrations? Supervisor can register own occurrence only per matrix). Actually can a supervisor with team scope even register? canMemberRegisterOwnOccurrence now returns current member != null. And then validation applies team scope. The team_id must be in their team scope. So supervisor registers event for someone in their own team? Actually supervisor chooses team from the teams they supervise, then manager = their own superior? That's odd; if a supervisor registers an event for an employee in their supervised team, the "gestor responsável" per new rule is the *registrar's* leader immediate? Wait rule: "Gestor responsável = líder imediato de quem está cadastrando". Yes per docs line 177. Wait but actually that may not match business: the manager responsible for the event is the immediate leader of the reporter? That is what docs say (rule 2). Hmm, that's the product decision. Fine. So issue 2 likely OK given product rule; I'd not flag or flag low. But validation requires manager to be within team scope of the user unless own leader. If a supervisor (can't select manager) has superior outside their team scope, default manager = own superior (not in scope). The validation override allows own leader. So OK. But now consider: who else might register events on behalf of team but whose own leader is not in the team's member list? Not an issue because own leader override. Now consider canSelect users (gestors) submitting manager: allowed = leaders ∩ scope. applySsmaEventManagerAssignment for canSelect applies team filter via getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds (which returns null for Gestor Administrador and 'Supervisor' puro; but returns parsed team ids for Gestor de Equipe). Area-restricted gestor? getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds doesn't consider area. getSsmaPreventionAreaScope is used only in building options (the section with $areaScope). For a "Gestor de Área" tag: does getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds return non-null? Not for 'Gestor de Área' unless tag has team_limitation or parsed team IDs non-empty and team scope tag name. Let me check ssmaTeamScopePermissionTagNames to see which tags are included. But regardless, if a Gestor de Área has area limitation, applySsmaEventManagerAssignment would ignore area restriction (scope would be null from team filter) → allowed = all leaders in company, enabling selection of a manager outside their area. Whereas buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions in modal applies both team scope AND area scope (with intersection). So server-side assignment does not mirror the area restriction used by the UI. That is a genuine inconsistency → possible privilege issue (issue #3). The validation on submit uses team scope only too, in validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope (line 10386, area not checked). Hmm. Let me confirm whether there is an area validation elsewhere for event payload. Search for area scope in validation functions for event. Look at canCreateSsmaEvent or validate for area. Actually, let's check whether the whole event registration path for "Gestor de Área" with restricted area can pick manager outside area. Also whether "responsible" manager gate uses area scope at creation: normalizeSsmaEventManagerInDetails etc. Might not check area either. Let's look at how occurrences' dashboard handles area filter for list (occurrenceAreaFilterIds) and where it applies the area scope; maybe only for the "Prevenção" filter? Actually the changed code in the view-building function (line 13177...) applies $managerScopeIds intersection with area. But that's only for building the modal options list. applySsmaEventManagerAssignment (server-side) and validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope ignore area restriction. That's issue #3 — plausible real. Need to confirm the area-restricted gestor case is reachable. Let me read the region around buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions use and canSelect. And confirm area scope tag for "Gestor de Área". Let me read around lines 12960-13360 in controller (the view-building and the picker). Actually there were several changes around. Let me read 13140-13400. Also need to check that getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds returns null for area-only gestors. Let's check ssmaTeamScopePermissionTagNames and parseCompanyMemberTeamIds.
Tool Calls (4)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "function ssmaTeamScopePermissionTagNames"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
20042|    private function ssmaTeamScopePermissionTagNames(): array

code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "TAG_GESTOR_AREA"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 6
11612|        return $tagPm && in_array($tagPm->getName(), ['Gestor de Equipe', SsmaAreaLimitationScope::TAG_GESTOR_AREA], true);
12162|            SsmaAreaLimitationScope::TAG_GESTOR_AREA,
13096|        $ssmaIsTagAreaGestor     = $ssmaProductTagName === SsmaAreaLimitationScope::TAG_GESTOR_AREA;
13484|            && $ssmaProductTagName !== SsmaAreaLimitationScope::TAG_GESTOR_AREA
19225|                    SsmaAreaLimitationScope::TAG_GESTOR_AREA,
20533|            && in_array($tag->getName(), ['Gestor de Equipe', SsmaAreaLimitationScope::TAG_GESTOR_AREA], true);

File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAreaLimitationScope.php
Match lines: 2
16|    public const TAG_GESTOR_AREA = 'Gestor de Área';
23|        return [self::TAG_SUPERVISOR_AREA, self::TAG_GESTOR_AREA];

code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "function mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
15470|    private function mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow(SsmaEvent $e, array $teamsById): array

code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "function enrichOccurrenceManagerFields"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
28626|    private function enrichOccurrenceManagerFields(array $row, array $membersById, ?Company $company = null): array

Request #6 deepseek-v4-flash P:42.01K C:176 CR:41.47K CW:0 2543ms
Reasoning
Let me look at how the events registration functions operate. Let me search the create/update routes around lines 26400-26750 to understand flow (normalization, manager assignment, validation order, person ids). Let me also look at the area scope usage in the changed picker code — read around line 13140-13360 of the controller (inside the "view" building function) where $managerScopeIds is computed.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 26420, "end_line": 26760}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 26420-26760
26420|            return sprintf(
26421|                'Data da abordagem fora do prazo: só é possível registrar até %d dias após a data em que foi realizada (a partir de %s).',
26422|                self::SSMA_ABORDAGEM_JANELA_REGISTRO_DIAS,
26423|                $limiteMinimo->format('d/m/Y')
26424|            );
26425|        }
26426|
26427|        return null;
26428|    }
26429|
26430|    // =========================================================================
26431|    // EVENTOS SSMA (SSMAEvent tipado)
26432|    // =========================================================================
26433|
26434|    /**
26435|     * POST /manager/ssma/events
26436|     * Cria um novo evento SSMA tipado.
26437|     */
26438|    public function createEvent(Request $request): JsonResponse
26439|    {
26440|        /** @var \App\Entity\User|null $user */
26441|        $user    = $this->getUser();
26442|        $company = $user?->getCompany();
26443|        if (!$user || !$company) {
26444|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Não autenticado.'], 401);
26445|        }
26446|
26447|        $data = json_decode($request->getContent(), true) ?? [];
26448|        $data = $this->normalizeSsmaEventPayload($data, $company);
26449|        $data = $this->normalizeSsmaEventManagerInDetails($data, $company);
26450|        $data = $this->applySsmaEventManagerAssignment($data, $company, $user);
26451|        $data = $this->applySsmaDescaracterPermissionGate($data, $company, $user);
26452|        $data = $this->ensureSsmaEventTitle($data);
26453|
26454|        $validator = new \App\Service\Ssma\SsmaEventValidator();
26455|        $errors    = $validator->validate($data, [
26456|            'allowed_type_keys' => $this->ssmaOccurrenceTypeConfig->getAllowedTypeKeys($company),
26457|        ]);
26458|        if ($errors !== []) {
26459|            return new JsonResponse([
26460|                'success' => false,
26461|                'message' => implode(' ', $errors),
26462|                'errors'  => $errors,
26463|            ], 422);
26464|        }
26465|
26466|        if (!$this->canMemberRegisterOwnOccurrence($company, $user)) {
26467|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Você não tem autorização para registrar ocorrências.'], 403);
26468|        }
26469|
26470|        $typeKey = strtoupper(trim((string) ($data['type'] ?? '')));
26471|        if ($typeKey !== '' && !$this->canCreateSsmaOccurrenceType($typeKey)) {
26472|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Você não tem permissão para registrar ocorrências deste tipo.'], 403);
26473|        }
26474|
26475|        $eventDetails = is_array($data['details'] ?? null) ? $data['details'] : [];
26476|        if (
26477|            in_array($typeKey, ['ROS', 'QUASE_ACIDENTE', 'ACIDENTE_PESSOAL', 'ACIDENTE_MATERIAL', 'ACIDENTE_AMBIENTAL'], true)
26478|            && !$this->canAccessSsmaEventAprofundamento(
26479|                $company,
26480|                $user,
26481|                $typeKey,
26482|                $eventDetails,
26483|                (int) ($user->getId() ?? 0)
26484|            )
26485|        ) {
26486|            $data = $this->stripSsmaEventAprofundamentoFieldsFromPayload($data, $typeKey, []);
26487|        }
26488|
26489|        $teamScopeErr = $this->validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope($data, $company, $user);
26490|        if ($teamScopeErr !== null) {
26491|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => $teamScopeErr], 403);
26492|        }
26493|
26494|        try {
26495|            $service  = new \App\Service\Ssma\SsmaEventService($this->entityManager, $this->ssmaOccurrenceTypeConfig);
26496|            $payloads = $service->splitPersonalAccidentPayloads($data);
26497|            $editorMeta = $this->resolveSsmaEditorMeta($company, $user);
26498|            $registeredByName = trim(($user->getFirstName() ?? '') . ' ' . ($user->getLastName() ?? ''));
26499|            if ($registeredByName === '') {
26500|                $registeredByName = $user->getEmail() ?? 'Sistema';
26501|            }
26502|
26503|            foreach ($payloads as $payload) {
26504|                $payloadErrors = $validator->validate($payload, [
26505|                    'allowed_type_keys' => $this->ssmaOccurrenceTypeConfig->getAllowedTypeKeys($company),
26506|                ]);
26507|                if ($payloadErrors !== []) {
26508|                    return new JsonResponse([
26509|                        'success' => false,
26510|                        'message' => implode(' ', $payloadErrors),
26511|                        'errors'  => $payloadErrors,
26512|                    ], 422);
26513|                }
26514|            }
26515|
26516|            $events = [];
26517|            $flashApprovals = [];
26518|            foreach ($payloads as $payload) {
26519|                $event = $service->createFromPayload($payload, $user, $company, $editorMeta);
26520|                $events[] = $event;
26521|                $this->ssmaAutomationService->triggerForEvent(
26522|                    'ssma_on_occurrence_created',
26523|                    $event,
26524|                    $company,
26525|                    ['registered_by_name' => $registeredByName]
26526|                );
26527|                if (!empty($event->getDetails()['immediate_risk'])) {
26528|                    $this->ssmaNotificationService->notifyImmediateRisk($event);
26529|                }
26530|                if ($this->ssmaEventAprofundamentoPending($event)) {
26531|                    $this->ssmaNotificationService->notifyAprofundamentoSpecialists(
26532|                        $company,
26533|                        $user,
26534|                        (string) $event->getType(),
26535|                        (int) $event->getId(),
26536|                        'event'
26537|                    );
26538|                }
26539|                $this->maybeSubmitOccurrenceForValidation($event, $company, $user);
26540|                try {
26541|                    $flashApprovals[] = $this->ssmaFlashReportService->maybeAutoRequestApproval($event, $user);
26542|                } catch (\Throwable $flashErr) {
26543|                    $this->ssmaLogger->warning('Ssma createEvent flash approval: ' . $flashErr->getMessage());
26544|                    $flashApprovals[] = ['success' => false, 'message' => $flashErr->getMessage()];
26545|                }
26546|            }
26547|
26548|            $count = count($events);
26549|            $message = $count > 1
26550|                ? sprintf('%d ocorrências registradas — uma por acidentado.', $count)
26551|                : 'Ocorrência registrada com sucesso.';
26552|
26553|            return new JsonResponse([
26554|                'success' => true,
26555|                'message' => $message,
26556|                'event'   => $service->serialize($events[0]),
26557|                'events'  => array_map(static fn ($e) => $service->serialize($e), $events),
26558|                'count'   => $count,
26559|                'flash_approval' => $this->sanitizeFlashApprovalApiResponse($flashApprovals[0] ?? null),
26560|            ], 201);
26561|        } catch (\Throwable $e) {
26562|            $this->ssmaLogger->error('Ssma createEvent failed: '.$e->getMessage(), ['exception' => $e]);
26563|
26564|            $msg = $this->getParameter('kernel.debug') ? $e->getMessage() : 'Erro ao salvar o evento. Tente novamente.';
26565|
26566|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => $msg], 500);
26567|        }
26568|    }
26569|
26570|    /**
26571|     * GET /manager/ssma/events/{id}
26572|     * Retorna um evento pelo ID.
26573|     */
26574|    public function getEvent(int $id): JsonResponse
26575|    {
26576|        /** @var \App\Entity\User|null $user */
26577|        $user    = $this->getUser();
26578|        $company = $this->getSsmaCompany() ?? $user?->getCompany();
26579|        if (!$user || !$company) {
26580|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Não autenticado.'], 401);
26581|        }
26582|
26583|        $event = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\SsmaEvent::class)->find($id);
26584|
26585|        if (!$event || $event->getCompany()->getId() !== $company->getId()) {
26586|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Evento não encontrado.'], 404);
26587|        }
26588|
26589|        if (!$this->isSsmaEventVisibleUnderOccurrenceTeamDashboardScope($event, $company, $user)) {
26590|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Evento não encontrado.'], 404);
26591|        }
26592|
26593|        $service = new \App\Service\Ssma\SsmaEventService($this->entityManager, $this->ssmaOccurrenceTypeConfig);
26594|
26595|        return new JsonResponse(['success' => true, 'event' => $service->serialize($event)]);
26596|    }
26597|
26598|    /**
26599|     * POST /manager/ssma/events/{id}
26600|     * Atualiza um evento existente.
26601|     */
26602|    public function updateEvent(Request $request, int $id): JsonResponse
26603|    {
26604|        /** @var \App\Entity\User|null $user */
26605|        $user    = $this->getUser();
26606|        $company = $user?->getCompany();
26607|        if (!$user || !$company) {
26608|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Não autenticado.'], 401);
26609|        }
26610|
26611|        $event = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\SsmaEvent::class)->find($id);
26612|
26613|        if (!$event || $event->getCompany()->getId() !== $company->getId()) {
26614|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Evento não encontrado.'], 404);
26615|        }
26616|
26617|        if (!$this->isSsmaEventVisibleUnderOccurrenceTeamDashboardScope($event, $company, $user)) {
26618|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Evento não encontrado.'], 404);
26619|        }
26620|
26621|        $data = json_decode($request->getContent(), true) ?? [];
26622|        $aprofundamentoOnly = !empty($data['aprofundamento_only']);
26623|        $existingDetails = is_array($event->getDetails()) ? $event->getDetails() : [];
26624|        $aprofundamentoStatus = strtolower(trim((string) ($existingDetails['aprofundamento_status'] ?? '')));
26625|        $aprofundamentoFinalized = $aprofundamentoStatus === 'finalized'
26626|            || !empty($existingDetails['aprofundamento_complete']);
26627|
26628|        $canFullEdit = $this->canEditSsmaEvent($company, $user, $event);
26629|        $eventTypeForAccess = (string) ($data['type'] ?? $event->getType());
26630|        $canAprofundamento = $this->canAccessSsmaEventAprofundamento(
26631|            $company,
26632|            $user,
26633|            $eventTypeForAccess,
26634|            is_array($data['details'] ?? null) ? $data['details'] : $existingDetails,
26635|            (int) ($event->getCreatedById() ?? 0)
26636|        );
26637|        $isAprofundamentoUpdate = $aprofundamentoOnly
26638|            || !empty($data['aprofundamento_complete'])
26639|            || strtolower(trim((string) ($data['aprofundamento_status'] ?? ''))) === 'finalized';
26640|
26641|        if (!$canFullEdit) {
26642|            if (!$isAprofundamentoUpdate || !$canAprofundamento) {
26643|                return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Você não tem autorização para editar esse tipo de ocorrência.'], 403);
26644|            }
26645|            if ($aprofundamentoFinalized && !$this->isSsmaAprofundamentoAdmin($company, $user)) {
26646|                return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Aprofundamento finalizado. Somente um administrador ou gestor administrador pode alterar.'], 403);
26647|            }
26648|            $data = $this->mergeSsmaEventAprofundamentoOnlyPayload($event, $data);
26649|        } else {
26650|            $data = array_merge($this->eventToValidationArray($event), $data);
26651|            if ($aprofundamentoFinalized && !$this->isSsmaAprofundamentoAdmin($company, $user)) {
26652|                if ($aprofundamentoOnly || $isAprofundamentoUpdate) {
26653|                    return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Aprofundamento finalizado. Somente um administrador ou gestor administrador pode alterar.'], 403);
26654|                }
26655|                $data = $this->stripSsmaEventAprofundamentoFieldsFromPayload(
26656|                    $data,
26657|                    (string) ($data['type'] ?? $event->getType()),
26658|                    $existingDetails
26659|                );
26660|            }
26661|        }
26662|
26663|        $data = $this->normalizeSsmaEventPayload($data, $company);
26664|        $data = $this->normalizeSsmaEventManagerInDetails($data, $company);
26665|        $data = $this->applySsmaEventManagerAssignment($data, $company, $user, $existingDetails);
26666|        $data = $this->applySsmaDescaracterPermissionGate(
26667|            $data,
26668|            $company,
26669|            $user,
26670|            $existingDetails
26671|        );
26672|
26673|        $eventType = (string) ($data['type'] ?? $event->getType());
26674|        $eventDetails = is_array($data['details'] ?? null) ? $data['details'] : [];
26675|        // Em modo só-aprofundamento o especialista já está autorizado; não stripa o que acabou de enviar.
26676|        if (
26677|            !$aprofundamentoOnly
26678|            && !$this->canAccessSsmaEventAprofundamento($company, $user, $eventType, $eventDetails, $event->getCreatedById())
26679|            && in_array($eventType, ['ROS', 'QUASE_ACIDENTE', 'ACIDENTE_PESSOAL', 'ACIDENTE_MATERIAL', 'ACIDENTE_AMBIENTAL'], true)
26680|        ) {
26681|            $data = $this->stripSsmaEventAprofundamentoFieldsFromPayload(
26682|                $data,
26683|                $eventType,
26684|                $existingDetails
26685|            );
26686|        }
26687|
26688|        // Draft vs finalize do aprofundamento (especialista / admin).
26689|        $wantsFinalize = false;
26690|        if ($aprofundamentoOnly || !empty($data['aprofundamento_complete']) || array_key_exists('aprofundamento_status', $data)) {
26691|            $detailsOut = is_array($data['details'] ?? null) ? $data['details'] : [];
26692|            $wantsFinalize = !empty($data['aprofundamento_complete'])
26693|                || strtolower(trim((string) ($data['aprofundamento_status'] ?? ''))) === 'finalized';
26694|            if ($wantsFinalize) {
26695|                $data['aprofundamento_complete'] = true;
26696|                $detailsOut['aprofundamento_complete'] = true;
26697|                $detailsOut['aprofundamento_status'] = 'finalized';
26698|            } else {
26699|                $data['aprofundamento_complete'] = false;
26700|                $detailsOut['aprofundamento_complete'] = false;
26701|                $detailsOut['aprofundamento_status'] = 'draft';
26702|            }
26703|            $data['details'] = $detailsOut;
26704|        }
26705|
26706|        // Valida apenas se type ou details estiverem presentes no payload (atualização parcial ok)
26707|        if (!empty($data['type']) || !empty($data['details'])) {
26708|            $validator = new \App\Service\Ssma\SsmaEventValidator();
26709|            $errors    = $validator->validate($data, [
26710|                'allowed_type_keys' => $this->ssmaOccurrenceTypeConfig->getAllowedTypeKeys($company),
26711|                'soft_aprofundamento' => $aprofundamentoOnly && !$wantsFinalize,
26712|            ]);
26713|            if ($errors !== []) {
26714|                return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'errors' => $errors], 422);
26715|            }
26716|        }
26717|
26718|        $teamScopeErr = $this->validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope($data, $company, $user);
26719|        if ($teamScopeErr !== null) {
26720|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => $teamScopeErr], 403);
26721|        }
26722|
26723|        $service = new \App\Service\Ssma\SsmaEventService($this->entityManager, $this->ssmaOccurrenceTypeConfig);
26724|        $prevType         = $event->getType();
26725|        $prevStatus       = $event->getStatus();
26726|        $prevImmediateRisk = !empty($event->getDetails()['immediate_risk']);
26727|        $prevManagerId = (int) ($event->getDetails()['manager_id'] ?? 0);
26728|        $wasRejectedApproval = $this->ssmaOccurrenceApprovalService->getState($event)['status']
26729|            === \App\Service\Ssma\SsmaOccurrenceApprovalService::STATUS_REJECTED;
26730|        $editorMeta = $this->resolveSsmaEditorMeta($company, $user);
26731|        $event      = $service->updateFromPayload($event, $data, $user, $editorMeta);
26732|
26733|        if ($wasRejectedApproval) {
26734|            // Readequação: reenvia tanto na edição completa quanto ao finalizar só o aprofundamento.
26735|            $this->maybeSubmitOccurrenceForValidation($event, $company, $user, true);
26736|        } elseif ($wantsFinalize) {
26737|            $this->maybeSubmitOccurrenceForValidation($event, $company, $user, false);
26738|        }
26739|
26740|        $registeredByName = trim(($user->getFirstName() ?? '') . ' ' . ($user->getLastName() ?? ''));
26741|        if ($registeredByName === '') {
26742|            $registeredByName = $user->getEmail() ?? 'Sistema';
26743|        }
26744|        $automationContext = [
26745|            'registered_by_name' => $registeredByName,
26746|            'type_raw'           => $event->getType(),
26747|            'new_type'           => $event->getType(),
26748|        ];
26749|        $flashApproval = null;
26750|
26751|        try {
26752|            $this->ssmaAutomationService->triggerForEvent(
26753|                'ssma_on_occurrence_updated',
26754|                $event,
26755|                $company,
26756|                $automationContext
26757|            );
26758|            if ($prevStatus !== $event->getStatus()) {
26759|                $this->ssmaAutomationService->triggerForEvent(
26760|                    'ssma_on_status_change',
Request #7 deepseek-v4-flash P:47.27K C:1.95K CR:42.11K CW:0 16450ms
Reasoning
Now, key observation: `applySsmaEventManagerAssignment` is called BEFORE the `SsmaEventValidator` and `validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope`. Interesting: In updateEvent, `validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope` is called always when type/details present. But updateEvent also runs for aprofundamento-only updates by a specialist. In aprofundamento-only updates the data may be merged; `$existingDetails` passed to applySsmaEventManagerAssignment preserves existing manager id. But validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope will then validate manager against leaders/scope. If the specialist editing aprofundamento is NOT within scope and event's manager is not a leader or not in their team scope → error? Wait, in updateEvent, `canFullEdit` false and `isAprofundamentoUpdate` true path merges only aprofundamento fields, but after merge `$data` includes existing full data (via mergeSsmaEventAprofundamentoOnlyPayload). Hmm. Let me check. Actually, the scope check in updateEvent applies for any update with type/details including aprofundamento-only. Wait line 26706: validators only run if data has type or details. In aprofundamento-only path, after merge, details present, so validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope runs with the full merged data. The manager_id is existingDetails manager. Now the specialist's scope may not include that manager (e.g., specialist whose scope null returns early). Scope null → return null → passes. If specialist has team scope (like a supervisor aprofundamento? aprofundamento specialists by config might not have scope). OK. But wait: previously, in updateEvent, was validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope already present? The diff shows that within validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope the manager check block changed (that's in this diff at line ~10424). The validator is used in both createEvent and updateEvent already. So the changed validation is only about manager. Since manager assignment happens before validation, and existing manager preserved for non-canSelect users. If the event being edited has an existing manager that is not in the editor's scope and the editor can't change manager → applySsmaEventManagerAssignment keeps existingManagerId. Then validation checks managerAllowed = leaderIds[manager] && allowedMembers[manager] OR ownLeader == manager. If existing manager is not a leader immediate of anyone (e.g., old data where manager was some gestor tag who has no subordinates) → validation error! That could block editing existing events with historical manager values that are not "leaders" per the new hierarchy rule. For example, before this PR, ROS/Evento manager could be any gestor from company, including a "Gestor de Equipe" who is not superior of anyone. Editing such an event would now fail with "O gestor responsável precisa ser líder imediato de alguém e pertencer ao seu escopo de equipe/área." even though the user just wants to update details. That's a real regression: existing events stored with a manager not being immediate leader of someone would become uneditable. Wait but the update path: canFullEdit users (gestor admin etc.) editing events; also the event creator editing their own? Let me check isSsmaEventVisibleUnderOccurrenceTeamDashboardScope and canEditSsmaEvent. Actually for a canFullEdit user (e.g., Gestor Administrador whose scope null): validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope returns null (scope null) early, so no manager validation. For supervisors with team scope editing an existing event where manager not leader → error could block. Actually the supervisor may edit their own events? canEditSsmaEvent may allow creator to edit? Let's inspect. Not sure. In any case, an edge case where manager_id historical value not a leader immediate, and the current editor has a team scope, could break updates. This is moderately plausible. But it may also be considered a data-repair scenario. But there is a subtlety: when a member updates their own event, is manager reassigned? applySsmaEventManagerAssignment: canSelect false, existingManagerId>0 keeps existing manager. Then validation uses leaderIds. If existing manager isn't a "leader" (superior of anyone), validation fails even if manager field disabled and unchanged. That's a real risk. Hmm. But how likely is it that the historical manager_id is not a leader? Under the old rule, manager (ROS reporter) could be the reporter himself (a plain member, not leader). For plain member ROS, forceSsmaRosReporterForPlainMember set manager_id = memberId (the reporter). That reporter is likely not the superior of anyone. Now when editing that ROS event... updateEvent: does the reporter have team scope? A plain member typically no scope → scope null → validation skipped. Good. For a supervisor? Supervisor reporting ROS under old rule would have manager = themselves. Now editing would fail if they have team scope. Old rule allowed supervisor ROS? isSsmaViewer blocked action? Actually prior code (canMemberRegisterOwnOccurrence) blocked supervisors (isSsmaViewer) from registering own occurrences? In the bug fix #1, supervisor lost button. So under old code a supervisor couldn't register ROS anyway. Hmm wait, they could not register because isSsmaViewer returns true blocks registration entirely; but bug #1 is that supervisors lost permission even if matrix allowed. So after this PR supervisors CAN register. So supervisors previously did not create events. So existing events' manager might be plain members (non-leader) or gestors. But those events aren't typically edited by supervisors. Editing is done by the event creator? canEditSsmaEvent allows creator to edit up to some point? Let me check canEditSsmaEvent. Also, this is a lot of speculation. I'll dig less. Let me instead focus on the concrete issue in the changed validation: `validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope`'s manager check now requires the manager to be an immediate leader belonging to the editor's team scope OR the editor's own leader. This runs for createEvent and updateEvent. For a supervisor registering (creating) an event: default manager set to their own leader if it exists. Good. If they pick team and the own leader is in scope, fine. When there's no hierarchy (leader null) and no canSelect → blocked with 'Informe o gestor responsável.' But can plain member create events (scope null)? Yes plain members have scope null → not blocked. But who creates events with a team scope? supervisors/gestor de equipe (their scope is their teams). And also what about members with team scope? Actually team scope only from tags/team limitations. Members default no scope. So event creation by supervisors: it's likely intended they register occurrences on behalf of their team members. Now under the new rule the "gestor responsável" is the leader immediate of the registrant. But when a supervisor registers an event for one of their team members, whose leader matters? Wait docs say: "Gestor responsável = líder imediato (getSuperior()) de quem está cadastrando." Hmm. Actually maybe the manager should be the employee's leader? The docs line 177: "Gestor responsável = líder imediato (getSuperior()) de quem está cadastrando. Membro/supervisor vê o campo preenchido e não edita." This seems odd for supervisors registering team events, but is what the product decided. Also applySsmaEventManagerAssignment uses resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId. OK regardless of product decision, the validate path may block when manager not set. But that's aligned with the requirement. Now issue #2's main point is: when a user has no superior, event registration could be blocked (supervisor with team scope). Given uncertainty, I'll rate this lower/medium. But we need to be careful about false positives given product rules. The user-specific rule from review plan considers this high. Let me verify the real scenario for supervisors creating events: A "Supervisor de Equipe" is likely someone with members under them, who themselves reports to someone (has a superior). In typical orgs there'd be a superior. But small companies may not. So it's plausible but not certain. I'll note as medium perhaps, or combine with the historical data concern. Now issue #3 area scope: canSelect users - "Gestor de Área". getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds checks ssmaTeamScopePermissionTagNames; let me check its contents to determine whether 'Gestor de Área' is included. Let me read 20042.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 20030, "end_line": 20075}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 20030-20075
20030|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $members
20031|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $teams
20032|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $inspections
20033|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $abordagens
20034|     *
20035|     * @return array{inspecao: list<array<string,mixed>>, abordagem: list<array<string,mixed>>} Cada linha pode incluir kind_disabled=true (membro desligado só neste tipo de meta).
20036|     */
20037|    /**
20038|     * Tags de gestão/supervisão de equipe no produto SSMA (inclui "Supervisor" legado no hub).
20039|     *
20040|     * @return list<string>
20041|     */
20042|    private function ssmaTeamScopePermissionTagNames(): array
20043|    {
20044|        return ['Gestor de Equipe', 'Supervisor de Equipe', 'Supervisor'];
20045|    }
20046|
20047|    /**
20048|     * Opções de "Gestor responsável" no modal de ocorrência: ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR + tags Gestor/Supervisor de Equipe no produto SSMA.
20049|     *
20050|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $allMembers
20051|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $gestoresByRole
20052|     * @param array<int, true>|null $allowedMemberIds null = empresa inteira; mapa vazio = ninguém no escopo
20053|     *
20054|     * @return list<array<string, mixed>>
20055|     */
20056|    private function sortSsmaMemberRowsByName(array $members): array
20057|    {
20058|        usort($members, static function (array $a, array $b): int {
20059|            return strcasecmp((string) ($a['name'] ?? ''), (string) ($b['name'] ?? ''));
20060|        });
20061|
20062|        return $members;
20063|    }
20064|
20065|    /**
20066|     * @param array<int, true>|null $allowedMemberIds null = empresa inteira; mapa vazio = ninguém no escopo
20067|     *
20068|     * @return list<array<string, mixed>>
20069|     */
20070|    private function buildSsmaEventModalGestores(
20071|        Company $company,
20072|        array $allMembers,
20073|        array $gestoresByRole,
20074|        ?array $allowedMemberIds,
20075|    ): array {
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember"}
File: docs/engineering/pr/homolog/PR_commits_homolog.txt
Match lines: 1
2365|f6f16cfbe7 fix: delegate SSMA permission tag resolution to PermissionTagByMemberService - SsmaController::resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember was querying PermissionTagByMember directly, bypassing service logic for stale/auto-propagated tags. Now injects PermissionTagByMemberService to ensure consistent resolution and fix ssmaCanRegisterNewOccurrence for Yann-like cases.

File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 21
1329|                $tag = $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($member);
1425|        return $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($member);
10126|                $tag = $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($member);
10148|            ? $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($member)
10212|        $tag = $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($member);
10264|        $tag = $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($member);
10314|        $tag = $member ? $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($member, 'ssma-prevention') : null;
10693|        if ($this->isSsmaGestorAdministradorTag($this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($member))) {
10735|    private function resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember(
11529|        $tag = $member ? $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($member) : null;
11592|        $tagPm = $memberPm ? $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($memberPm) : null;
11604|                $resolvedScoped = $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($memberScoped);
11985|            $tag = $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($member);
12014|            $tag = $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($member);
12158|        $tagName = $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($member)?->getName();
13014|                $resolvedTag = $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($memberForTagCheck);
19218|                $tagCheck = $memberTagCheck ? $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($memberTagCheck) : null;
20114|            $tag = $currentMember ? $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($currentMember) : null;
20530|        $tag = $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($member);
20548|        $tag = $member ? $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($member) : null;
23401|            $tag = $member ? $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($member) : null;

File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaOccurrenceCreatePermissionService.php
Match lines: 2
621|        $tag = $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($member, $ssmaProduct);
641|    private function resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember(CompanyMembers $member, ?Product $ssmaProduct = null): ?PermissionTag

Request #8 deepseek-v4-flash P:50.61K C:719 CR:49.15K CW:0 6468ms
Reasoning
Now I need to confirm getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds behavior for a "Gestor de Área". 'Gestor de Área' is not in ssmaTeamScopePermissionTagNames (which lists team tags). But the parseCompanyMemberTeamIds might return teams for area gestor if member assigned teams. Also member might have team_limitation tag property? For area gestor, the tag likely is area-based (SsmaAreaLimitationScope tags). So for a pure Gestor de Área (no team), getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds likely returns null (since tag not in scope names, no team_limitation on tag, no viewer teams). Actually wait: there might be auto-propagated team limitation on 'Gestor de Área' tags? Let's read parseCompanyMemberTeamIds and the logic: if tag && tag->getTeamLimitation() → return parsed. It's possible an area gestor has team limitation set for their area's teams... Actually in this domain, team_limitation/area_limitation are tag properties. 'Gestor de Área' likely has area_limitation = something. Not sure. Anyway the picker build uses $managerScopeIds = collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams over occurrenceTeamFilterIds only; then if area restricted, intersect with areaMemberIds. So UI options respect both. Server-side applySsmaEventManagerAssignment only intersects team scope. So for a "Gestor de Área" user who can select managers, the server would allow selecting any leader in the company if their team scope is null, ignoring area. So a Gestor de Área restricted to area X could POST manager_id = leader from area Y → accepted. That is inconsistent with the validation that was applied for the picker: but wait validation for manager also only uses team scope (validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope uses getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds). So there is a mismatch between the modal options (which intersect with area scope) and server-side validation (only team scope). Given the code path in the picker option building explicitly applies area scope to restrict options, the server side should too, otherwise a request can bypass the area constraint. That would matter if Gestor de Área has restricted area but null team scope. But which area scope is used to restrict event registration? Actually area scope relates to "Prevenção Ativa"? The areaScope functions used in the modal: getSsmaPreventionAreaScope with ssma-prevention product? Wait getSsmaPreventionAreaScope resolves tag with product 'ssma-prevention'. Hmm. The occurrence event registration might be under SSMA product, but area limitations might apply more widely. Let's look at how the change around line 13177-13230 builds the scope for the modal and confirm both scopes interplay. Let me read the section 13140-13360 in the controller to understand the full context of the changes in view building, and how managerScopeIds is derived.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 12960, "end_line": 13400}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 12960-13400
12960|                        foreach ($occurrences as $idx => $occRow) {
12961|                            $entityId = (int) ($occRow['id'] ?? 0);
12962|                            $key = (!empty($occRow['is_ssma_event']) ? 'e:' : 'o:') . $entityId;
12963|                            $occurrences[$idx]['cause_tree_id'] = $treeMeta[$key]['cause_tree_id'] ?? null;
12964|                        }
12965|                    }
12966|                }
12967|                $occurrences = $this->enrichOccurrencesCommitteeTriggerFlags($occurrences, $company);
12968|                $occurrences = $this->enrichOccurrencesGravityLabels($occurrences);
12969|            }
12970|            if ($deferOccurrenceHubHeavyData) {
12971|                $actionsTaken = [];
12972|                $inspections = [];
12973|                $horasData = [];
12974|            } else {
12975|            $actionsTaken = $company ? $this->loadActions($company) : [];
12976|            $inspections  = $company ? $this->loadInspections($company, $allMembers, $teams) : [];
12977|            $horasData    = $company ? $this->loadHorasData($company) : [];
12978|            }
12979|        }
12980|        if ($needsPreventionCollections) {
12981|            $abordagens = $company ? $this->loadAbordagens($company) : [];
12982|        }
12983|        $occurrenceUiMeta = $this->getMockOccurrenceMetadata();
12984|
12985|        $userTechnicalTypes = $company
12986|            ? $this->resolveUserTechnicalTypes($company, $user, $companyMembers ?? [])
12987|            : [];
12988|        $ssmaCanManageOccurrences = $this->canManageSsmaOccurrences();
12989|        $ssmaCanAccessSupervisorSurface = $this->canAccessSsmaSupervisorSurface();
12990|        $ssmaCanAccessPreventionPanelAndMetas = $this->canAccessPreventionDashboardAndMetasTabs();
12991|        $ssmaCanAccessOccurrencePanel = $ssmaCanManageOccurrences || $this->isSsmaViewer();
12992|        // Supervisores veem a aba Automações mas não criam; o botão de criação usa ssmaCanManageOccurrences
12993|        $ssmaCanAccessOccurrenceAutomations = $ssmaCanManageOccurrences || $this->isSsmaViewer();
12994|        $ssmaCanManageConfig = $this->canManageSsmaConfig();
12995|        $ssmaCanManagePermissions = $this->canManageSsmaPermissions();
12996|        // ssmaCanCreateLinkedActions: botão "Criar ação" na aba Ocorrências e occurrence_view.
12997|        // Brenda: Supervisor só visualiza (dash/painel). Criar/editar fica com gestor/admin
12998|        // e Gestor de Equipe (override abaixo). Membro comum não cria.
12999|        $ssmaCanCreateLinkedActions = $this->canMutateSsmaActionPlan();
13000|        $ssmaCanMutateActionPlan = $ssmaCanCreateLinkedActions;
13001|        // ssmaCanCreateCauseTree: Supervisor ?? SOMENTE LEITURA na Árvore de Causas (planilha).
13002|        // NÃO incluir isSsmaViewer() aqui. Usa produto ssma-cause-tree (não can_create de ssma-occurrences).
13003|        $ssmaCanCreateCauseTree = $this->canCreateSsmaCauseTree();
13004|        $ssmaCanCreateAuthorization = $ssmaCanManageOccurrences;
13005|        $ssmaCanEditHorasTrabalhadas = $this->canEditSsmaHorasTrabalhadas();
13006|
13007|        // Tag SSMA do colaborador — sempre resolve (ROLE_MANAGER de plataforma ≠ perfil SSMA).
13008|        $ssmaProductTagName = null;
13009|        $memberForTagCheck = null;
13010|        $ssmaPreventionProductTagName = null;
13011|        if ($company && $user instanceof User) {
13012|            $memberForTagCheck = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
13013|            if ($memberForTagCheck) {
13014|                $resolvedTag = $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($memberForTagCheck);
13015|                if ($resolvedTag) {
13016|                    $ssmaProductTagName = $resolvedTag->getName();
13017|                }
13018|                if ($this->memberIsSsmaGestorAdministrador($memberForTagCheck)) {
13019|                    $ssmaProductTagName = 'Gestor Administrador';
13020|                }
13021|                $ssmaPreventionProductTagName = $this->ssmaPreventionHubAccessService
13022|                    ->resolvePreventionProductTagName($memberForTagCheck);
13023|            }
13024|        }
13025|
13026|        // Membro/Inspetor: visão de pessoa física (matriz de tipos + registrar).
13027|        // Só strip se tiver ROLE_USER (Palloma). Conta admin empresa sem ROLE_USER (Aura) mantém abas.
13028|        // Tenant / SUPER_ADMIN mantêm abas mesmo com tag Membro (regressão Felipe).
13029|        $ssmaIsPlainProductMemberUi = SsmaOccurrenceCreatePermissionService::shouldStripOccurrenceManagementTabsUi(
13030|            $ssmaProductTagName,
13031|            $this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN'),
13032|            $this->isGranted('ROLE_TENANT'),
13033|            $user instanceof User && in_array('ROLE_USER', $user->getRoles(), true)
13034|        );
13035|        if ($ssmaIsPlainProductMemberUi && !$this->memberIsSsmaGestorAdministrador($memberForTagCheck)) {
13036|            $ssmaCanManageOccurrences = false;
13037|            $ssmaCanAccessSupervisorSurface = false;
13038|            $ssmaCanAccessPreventionPanelAndMetas = false;
13039|            $ssmaCanAccessOccurrencePanel = false;
13040|            $ssmaCanAccessOccurrenceAutomations = false;
13041|            $ssmaCanManageConfig = false;
13042|            $ssmaCanManagePermissions = false;
13043|            $ssmaCanCreateLinkedActions = false;
13044|            $ssmaCanCreateAuthorization = false;
13045|        }
13046|
13047|        $loggedMemberForCauseTree = ($company && $user instanceof User)
13048|            ? $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user)
13049|            : null;
13050|
13051|        // Especialistas técnicos (SsmaPermissionTagMember) e gestores/supervisores podem visualizar.
13052|        // Membro/Inspetor com acesso só via mapa legado tipo/equipe NÃO recebem o botão na listagem.
13053|        $ssmaCanViewCauseTree = $ssmaCanCreateCauseTree
13054|            || $this->isSsmaViewer()
13055|            || in_array($ssmaProductTagName, ['Gestor Administrador', 'Gestor de Equipe', 'Supervisor de Equipe', 'Supervisor'], true)
13056|            || ($loggedMemberForCauseTree && $company && $this->hasSsmaTechnicalCauseTreeAccess($loggedMemberForCauseTree, $company));
13057|
13058|        // Hub Ocorrências — botão "Registrar ocorrência" (empty state / FAB): Membro não cria (planilha),
13059|        // mesmo com can_create na tag. Só roles de gestão na empresa ou tag Gestor de Equipe / G. Administrador com manage.
13060|        // Reutiliza $ssmaProductTagName (já corrigido por memberIsSsmaGestorAdministrador).
13061|        $ssmaProductTagNameForRegister = $ssmaProductTagName;
13062|        $ssmaCanRegisterNewOccurrence = $this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN')
13063|            || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER')
13064|            || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR')
13065|            || \in_array($ssmaProductTagNameForRegister, ['Gestor de Equipe', 'Gestor Administrador'], true)
13066|            // Permissão padrão do Membro: registrar a própria ocorrência.
13067|            || $this->canMemberRegisterOwnOccurrence($company, $user);
13068|
13069|        $loggedMemberForOccurrence = ($company && $user instanceof User)
13070|            ? $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user)
13071|            : null;
13072|        $ssmaAllowedCreateTypes = ($company && $user instanceof User)
13073|            ? $this->ssmaOccurrenceCreatePermissionService->resolveAllowedCreateTypes(
13074|                $loggedMemberForOccurrence,
13075|                $user,
13076|                $company,
13077|                $this->ssmaOccurrenceTypeConfig->getAllowedTypeKeys($company),
13078|                $ssmaCanManageOccurrences,
13079|            )
13080|            : [];
13081|        if (!$ssmaCanRegisterNewOccurrence && $ssmaAllowedCreateTypes !== []) {
13082|            $ssmaCanRegisterNewOccurrence = true;
13083|        }
13084|
13085|        $occurrenceTeamFilterIds = $this->getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds($company, $user);
13086|        $areaScope = $this->getSsmaPreventionAreaScope($company, $user);
13087|        $occurrenceAreaFilterIds = $areaScope->isRestricted() ? $areaScope->areaIds() : null;
13088|        $viewerTeamIds = $this->getSsmaViewerTeamIds();
13089|
13090|        // ── Detecção de Supervisor/Gestor de Equipe via tag SSMA ──────────────────────────────
13091|        // Usuários com ROLE_USER + tag SSMA (sem ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER global) não são detectados pelas
13092|        // funções baseadas em role. Identificamos o perfil pelo nome da tag para ajustar flags de UI.
13093|        $ssmaIsTagTeamSupervisor = in_array($ssmaProductTagName, ['Supervisor de Equipe', 'Supervisor'], true);
13094|        $ssmaIsTagTeamGestor     = $ssmaProductTagName === 'Gestor de Equipe';
13095|        $ssmaIsTagAreaSupervisor = $ssmaProductTagName === SsmaAreaLimitationScope::TAG_SUPERVISOR_AREA;
13096|        $ssmaIsTagAreaGestor     = $ssmaProductTagName === SsmaAreaLimitationScope::TAG_GESTOR_AREA;
13097|        $ssmaIsPreventionTagTeamSupervisor = in_array($ssmaPreventionProductTagName, ['Supervisor de Equipe', 'Supervisor'], true);
13098|        $ssmaIsPreventionTagTeamGestor = $ssmaPreventionProductTagName === 'Gestor de Equipe';
13099|
13100|        // Painel + Metas: libera para Sup/G. de Equipe/Área e Gestor Administrador (ocorrências + ssma-prevention)
13101|        if (!$ssmaCanAccessPreventionPanelAndMetas
13102|            && (
13103|                $ssmaIsTagTeamSupervisor
13104|                || $ssmaIsTagTeamGestor
13105|                || $ssmaIsTagAreaSupervisor
13106|                || $ssmaIsTagAreaGestor
13107|                || $ssmaProductTagName === 'Gestor Administrador'
13108|                || $ssmaIsPreventionTagTeamSupervisor
13109|                || $ssmaIsPreventionTagTeamGestor
13110|                || $ssmaPreventionProductTagName === 'Gestor Administrador'
13111|            )
13112|        ) {
13113|            $ssmaCanAccessPreventionPanelAndMetas = true;
13114|        }
13115|
13116|        // Membro/Inspetor (pessoa física / Palloma): não acessa Painel nem Metas.
13117|        // Conta admin empresa sem ROLE_USER (Aura), Tenant e SUPER_ADMIN mantêm — mesmo contrato das abas de Ocorrências.
13118|        if (SsmaOccurrenceCreatePermissionService::shouldStripOccurrenceManagementTabsUi(
13119|            $ssmaProductTagName,
13120|            $this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN'),
13121|            $this->isGranted('ROLE_TENANT'),
13122|            $user instanceof User && in_array('ROLE_USER', $user->getRoles(), true)
13123|        )) {
13124|            $ssmaCanAccessPreventionPanelAndMetas = false;
13125|        }
13126|
13127|        // Modal + Evento: título/status ocultos na criação para todos os perfis (Figma Etapa 0).
13128|        // Na edição o JS (evApplyAuraTitleStatusVisibility) reexibe conforme o modo.
13129|        $ssmaHideEventTitleStatusOnCreate = true;
13130|
13131|        // ssmaIsTeamViewer: true quando o usuário opera com escopo de equipe (via role SSMA OU via tag SSMA)
13132|        // Usado para sinalizar ao template que os dados estáo limitados ?? equipe.
13133|        $ssmaIsTeamViewerFlag = $viewerTeamIds !== null || $ssmaIsTagTeamSupervisor || $ssmaIsTagTeamGestor
13134|            || $ssmaIsTagAreaSupervisor || $ssmaIsTagAreaGestor;
13135|
13136|        // ssmaCanCreatePreventionItems: Gestor de Equipe/Área e Gestor Administrador via tag SSMA
13137|        // também podem registrar inspeções/abordagens (ssmaCanManageOccurrences = true via tag).
13138|        $ssmaCanCreatePreventionItems = (
13139|            $this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN')
13140|            || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER')
13141|            || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR')
13142|            || (
13143|                $ssmaCanManageOccurrences
13144|                && ($ssmaIsTagTeamGestor || $ssmaIsTagAreaGestor || $ssmaProductTagName === 'Gestor Administrador')
13145|            )
13146|        );
13147|
13148|        // ssmaCanEditPreventionContent: controla botões Editar/Finalizar/Deletar em inspeções e abordagens
13149|        // e o botão "Configuração" na aba Metas.
13150|        // Supervisor registra/edita o próprio conteúdo (can_mutate por item); gestão edita todos.
13151|        $ssmaCanEditPreventionContent = $ssmaCanManageOccurrences
13152|            && !$this->isSsmaViewer()
13153|            && !$ssmaIsTagTeamSupervisor
13154|            && !$ssmaIsTagAreaSupervisor;
13155|        $ssmaPreventionMutateOwnOnly = false;
13156|
13157|        // Configurações da aba Prevenção Ativa: Sup/Gestor de Equipe ou Área não acessam (planilha: "Não acessa")
13158|        if ($ssmaIsTagTeamSupervisor || $ssmaIsTagTeamGestor || $ssmaIsTagAreaSupervisor || $ssmaIsTagAreaGestor) {
13159|            $ssmaCanManageConfig = false;
13160|        }
13161|
13162|        // G. Equipe via tag SSMA pode criar ação (Plano de Ação).
13163|        // Árvore de causas: {@see canCreateSsmaCauseTree()} já cobre Gestor de Equipe.
13164|        if ($ssmaIsTagTeamGestor || $ssmaIsTagAreaGestor) {
13165|            $ssmaCanCreateLinkedActions = true;
13166|            $ssmaCanMutateActionPlan = true;
13167|        }
13168|
13169|        // Tabela de metas por pessoa (aba Metas): edição global só para gestão; membro com can_create não gere metas alheias.
13170|        $ssmaCanEditPreventionMetasTable = $company && $user instanceof User
13171|            && $this->canEditPreventionMetasTableForCurrentUser($company, $user);
13172|
13173|        // ssmaPreventionCanCreateLinkedActions: botão "Criar ação" em Inspeções e Abordagem.
13174|        // Alinhado com ssmaCanCreateLinkedActions (Plano de Ações): quem não pode criar
13175|        // ação no Plano de Ações também não pode criar em inspeção/abordagem/árvore.
13176|        $ssmaPreventionCanCreateLinkedActions = $ssmaCanCreateLinkedActions;
13177|
13178|        $teamsForEventModal = $teams;
13179|        $allMembersForEventPeople = $allMembers;
13180|        $ssmaEventFormDefaults = ['manager_id' => null, 'team_id' => null];
13181|        $applyTeamEventScope = $occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== null && $occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== [];
13182|        $ssmaCanChangeEventManager = $this->canSelectSsmaEventResponsibleManager(
13183|            $company,
13184|            $user instanceof User ? $user : null
13185|        );
13186|        $ownImmediateLeaderId = ($company instanceof Company && $user instanceof User)
13187|            ? $this->resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId($company, $user)
13188|            : null;
13189|        $ssmaEventFormDefaults['manager_id'] = $ownImmediateLeaderId;
13190|
13191|        $managerScopeIds = null;
13192|        if ($applyTeamEventScope && $company instanceof Company) {
13193|            $teamIdStrScope = array_map('strval', $occurrenceTeamFilterIds);
13194|            $teamsForEventModal = array_values(array_filter(
13195|                $teams,
13196|                static fn (array $t): bool => in_array((string) ($t['id'] ?? ''), $teamIdStrScope, true)
13197|            ));
13198|            $managerScopeIds = $this->collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams($company, $occurrenceTeamFilterIds);
13199|            $ssmaEventFormDefaults['team_id'] = (int) $occurrenceTeamFilterIds[0];
13200|        }
13201|
13202|        if ($occurrenceAreaFilterIds !== null) {
13203|            $areaMemberIds = $areaScope->allowedMemberIds();
13204|            $teamsForEventModal = array_values(array_filter(
13205|                $teamsForEventModal,
13206|                static fn (array $t): bool => $areaScope->allowsTeam((int) ($t['id'] ?? 0))
13207|            ));
13208|            $managerScopeIds = $managerScopeIds === null
13209|                ? $areaMemberIds
13210|                : array_intersect_key($managerScopeIds, $areaMemberIds);
13211|            $applyTeamEventScope = true;
13212|            if ($teamsForEventModal !== []) {
13213|                $ssmaEventFormDefaults['team_id'] = (int) ($teamsForEventModal[0]['id'] ?? 0) ?: $ssmaEventFormDefaults['team_id'];
13214|            }
13215|        }
13216|
13217|        $gestoresForEventModal = $company instanceof Company
13218|            ? $this->buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions(
13219|                $company,
13220|                $allMembers,
13221|                $managerScopeIds,
13222|                $ownImmediateLeaderId,
13223|                $occurrences
13224|            )
13225|            : $gestores;
13226|
13227|        if ($gestores === [] && $allMembers !== []) {
13228|            $gestores = $allMembers;
13229|        }
13230|        $gestoresForEventModal = $this->enrichSsmaMemberRowsWithTeamMeta(
13231|            $gestoresForEventModal,
13232|            $teamNameByMemberId ?? []
13233|        );
13234|       
13235|
13236|        // Inspeção — equipe no modal: gestão vê escopo/lista completa; Membro só suas equipes (auto se uma).
13237|        // Mesmo contrato Palloma vs Aura das abas: tenant/SUPER_ADMIN/ROLE_MANAGER sem ROLE_USER
13238|        // com tag Membro não entram no recorte de pessoa física.
13239|        $teamsForInspectionModal = $applyTeamEventScope ? $teamsForEventModal : $teams;
13240|        $defaultInspectionTeamId = null;
13241|        $ssmaIsPlainPreventionMember = $ssmaIsPlainProductMemberUi
13242|            && !$this->memberIsSsmaGestorAdministrador($memberForTagCheck);
13243|        if ($ssmaIsPlainPreventionMember && $company && $user instanceof User) {
13244|            $plainMemberRow = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
13245|            $plainMemberTeamIds = $plainMemberRow ? $this->parseCompanyMemberTeamIds($plainMemberRow) : [];
13246|            if ($plainMemberTeamIds !== []) {
13247|                $plainTeamIdStr = array_map('strval', $plainMemberTeamIds);
13248|                $teamsForInspectionModal = array_values(array_filter(
13249|                    $teams,
13250|                    static fn (array $t): bool => in_array((string) ($t['id'] ?? ''), $plainTeamIdStr, true)
13251|                        && $areaScope->allowsTeam((int) ($t['id'] ?? 0))
13252|                ));
13253|                if (count($plainMemberTeamIds) === 1) {
13254|                    $defaultInspectionTeamId = (int) $plainMemberTeamIds[0];
13255|                }
13256|            } else {
13257|                $teamsForInspectionModal = [];
13258|            }
13259|        } elseif ($applyTeamEventScope && $teamsForInspectionModal !== []) {
13260|            $defaultInspectionTeamId = (int) ($ssmaEventFormDefaults['team_id'] ?? 0) ?: null;
13261|            if ($defaultInspectionTeamId === null && count($teamsForInspectionModal) === 1) {
13262|                $defaultInspectionTeamId = (int) ($teamsForInspectionModal[0]['id'] ?? 0) ?: null;
13263|            }
13264|        }
13265|        usort($teamsForInspectionModal, static function (array $a, array $b): int {
13266|            return strcasecmp((string) ($a['name'] ?? ''), (string) ($b['name'] ?? ''));
13267|        });
13268|
13269|        // Técnico especialista SSMA: tem SsmaPermissionTagMember mas sem gestão ou supervisão de equipe.
13270|        // O scope retornado por getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds ?? [] (sem equipe atribuída no produto),
13271|        // o que zeraria todas as ocorrências se o filtro de equipe fosse aplicado.
13272|        // Em vez disso, aplicamos um filtro por tipo de ocorrência após o bloco de equipe.
13273|        $isTechSpecialistOnly = !$ssmaCanManageOccurrences
13274|            && !$this->isSsmaViewer()
13275|            && $occurrenceTeamFilterIds === []
13276|            && !empty($userTechnicalTypes);
13277|
13278|        if ($occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== null && !$isTechSpecialistOnly) {
13279|            $teamIdStr = array_map('strval', $occurrenceTeamFilterIds);
13280|
13281|            // Coleta IDs de membros pertencentes às equipes do viewer
13282|            $memberIdsInTeams = [];
13283|            foreach ($teams as $team) {
13284|                if (in_array((string) ($team['id'] ?? ''), $teamIdStr, true)) {
13285|                    foreach ($team['members'] ?? [] as $mid) {
13286|                        $memberIdsInTeams[(int) $mid] = true;
13287|                    }
13288|                }
13289|            }
13290|
13291|            // Supervisor/Gestor de Equipe sem equipe atribuída: ainda deve ver ocorrências onde ??
13292|            // pessoalmente gestor responsável ou pessoa envolvida (regra da planilha SSMA).
13293|            // Sem esse ajuste, memberIdsInTeams ficaria vazio e o filtro de manager_id/people_ids
13294|            // nunca passaria — o supervisor não veria nada, mesmo sendo o responsável da ocorrência.
13295|            if ($occurrenceTeamFilterIds === [] && ($ssmaIsTagTeamSupervisor || $ssmaIsTagTeamGestor)) {
13296|                $selfMember = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
13297|                $selfMemberId = (int) ($selfMember?->getId() ?? 0);
13298|                if ($selfMemberId > 0) {
13299|                    $memberIdsInTeams[$selfMemberId] = true;
13300|                }
13301|            }
13302|
13303|            // Ocorrências: por team_id direto OU por manager_id/people_ids/responsible_ids pertencente ?? equipe.
13304|            // Supervisor de Equipe deve ver ocorrências onde ?? gestor responsável ou pessoa envolvida,
13305|            // mesmo que o team_id da ocorrência não esteja preenchido ou difira do escopo.
13306|            $viewerMemberIdForCreated = (int) ($this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user instanceof User ? $user : null)?->getId() ?? 0);
13307|            $occurrences = array_values(array_filter($occurrences, static function (array $o) use ($teamIdStr, $memberIdsInTeams, $viewerMemberIdForCreated): bool {
13308|                if (isset($o['team_id']) && $o['team_id'] !== null && in_array((string) $o['team_id'], $teamIdStr, true)) {
13309|                    return true;
13310|                }
13311|                if ($viewerMemberIdForCreated > 0 && (int) ($o['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0) === $viewerMemberIdForCreated) {
13312|                    return true;
13313|                }
13314|                $managerId = (int) ($o['manager_id'] ?? 0);
13315|                if ($managerId > 0 && isset($memberIdsInTeams[$managerId])) {
13316|                    return true;
13317|                }
13318|                $personId = (int) ($o['person_id'] ?? 0);
13319|                if ($personId > 0 && isset($memberIdsInTeams[$personId])) {
13320|                    return true;
13321|                }
13322|                foreach (array_merge((array) ($o['people_ids'] ?? []), (array) ($o['responsible_ids'] ?? [])) as $p) {
13323|                    if (isset($memberIdsInTeams[(int) $p])) {
13324|                        return true;
13325|                    }
13326|                }
13327|                return false;
13328|            }));
13329|
13330|            // Inspeções: por team_id
13331|            $inspections = array_values(array_filter($inspections, static function (array $i) use ($teamIdStr): bool {
13332|                $tid = $i['team_id'] ?? null;
13333|                return $tid !== null && $tid !== '' && in_array((string) $tid, $teamIdStr, true);
13334|            }));
13335|
13336|            // Abordagens: por observador pertencente ?? equipe
13337|            $abordagens = array_values(array_filter($abordagens, static function (array $ab) use ($memberIdsInTeams): bool {
13338|                $obsId = (int) ($ab['observador_id'] ?? 0);
13339|                return $obsId > 0 && isset($memberIdsInTeams[$obsId]);
13340|            }));
13341|
13342|            // Plano de Ação: ações em que pelo menos um responsável pertence ao escopo da equipe
13343|            // (não todas as ações das ocorrências visíveis da equipe).
13344|            $actionsTaken = $this->filterActionsByResponsibleMemberIds($actionsTaken, $memberIdsInTeams);
13345|        }
13346|
13347|        if ($occurrenceAreaFilterIds !== null) {
13348|            $areaMemberIds = $areaScope->allowedMemberIds();
13349|            // Equipe com área fora do recorte esconde a inspeção mesmo com participante interno:
13350|            // é o que mantém a interseção quando team_limitation e area_limitation estão juntos.
13351|            $inspections = SsmaAreaLimitationScope::filterInspectionsForAreaScope(
13352|                $inspections,
13353|                $areaScope->allowedTeamIds(),
13354|                $areaMemberIds,
13355|                $areaScope->teamIdsWithoutArea()
13356|            );
13357|            $abordagens = SsmaAreaLimitationScope::filterAbordagensByMemberIds(
13358|                $abordagens,
13359|                $areaMemberIds
13360|            );
13361|            // Mesmo critério da limitação de equipe: plano de ação só com responsável no recorte.
13362|            $actionsTaken = $this->filterActionsByResponsibleMemberIds($actionsTaken, $areaMemberIds);
13363|        }
13364|
13365|        // Técnico especialista: filtra ocorrências pelos tipos que têm autorização técnica (SsmaPermissionTagMember).
13366|        // Inspeções/Abordagens/Ações não são filtradas por equipe; o técnico não tem equipe SSMA atribuída.
13367|        if ($isTechSpecialistOnly) {
13368|            $techTypesSet = array_flip($userTechnicalTypes);
13369|            $occurrences = array_values(array_filter(
13370|                $occurrences,
13371|                static fn (array $o): bool => isset($techTypesSet[$o['type_value'] ?? ''])
13372|            ));
13373|        }
13374|
13375|        // Filtro de membro (próprio conteúdo) apenas quando o usuário NÃO tem escopo de equipe.
13376|        // Supervisor/Gestor de Equipe já foram limitados pelo filtro de equipe acima — aplicar o
13377|        // filtro de membro sobre eles reduziria a visão incorretamente para só o próprio conteúdo.
13378|        $ssmaPreventionInspectionEnabled = true;
13379|        $ssmaPreventionAbordagemEnabled  = true;
13380|
13381|        // Abas Inspeção/Abordagem (ROLE_USER): só quando meta do kind > 0 (igual critério da tabela Metas).
13382|        // - Sem row (nunca adicionado ou removido com lixeira) → abas ocultas.
13383|        // - Meta = -1 (desligado para esse kind) → aba oculta.
13384|        // - Meta >= 0 (ligado, mesmo sem goal definido ainda) → aba visível.
13385|        // Supervisores/Gestores de Equipe e Gestor Administrador são excluídos desse controle: suas abas dependem de outras flags.
13386|        if ($company && $user instanceof User
13387|            && !$this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN')
13388|            && !$this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER')
13389|            && !$this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR')) {
13390|            $memberForPreventionTabs = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
13391|            $memberIdPreventionTabs = (int) ($memberForPreventionTabs?->getId() ?? 0);
13392|            if ($memberIdPreventionTabs > 0) {
13393|                $metaKeyTabs = self::PREVENCAO_MEMBER_META_PREFIX . $memberIdPreventionTabs;
13394|                $memberMetaRowTabs = $this->entityManager->getRepository(SsmaMeta::class)
13395|                    ->findOneBy(['company' => $company, 'teamName' => $metaKeyTabs]);
13396|                // Le os valores de meta da linha encontrada (null quando a linha nao existe).
13397|                // Aba visível quando o membro está na tabela (row existe) e esse kind não está desligado (-1).
13398|                // meta=0 (ligado sem goal definido) → aba visível; meta=-1 (desligado) → aba oculta.
13399|                $isMgmtPreventionProfile = $this->ssmaPreventionHubAccessService
13400|                    ->isManagementPreventionTag($ssmaPreventionProductTagName)
Request #9 deepseek-v4-flash P:59.27K C:1.07K CR:51.33K CW:0 9510ms
Reasoning
Now, I see the modal option building uses both team scope and area scope (lines 13191-13225). So server-side picker options are filtered to the area when the area scope restricted. But applySsmaEventManagerAssignment server-side applies only getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds, and not the area scope. So if a "Gestor de Área" has restricted area scope but no team scope, then: - Modal list options = leader ids in area scope. - Server-side: scope = null (no team filter), so allowed = all leader ids in company (or empty? No: if scope null, allowed stays $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company)). So the server would accept manager_id of any leader, including those outside the area. That's inconsistent with the area restriction shown in the modal. But wait: validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope also only uses team scope, so submission with manager outside the area would succeed. So issue #3 is real. But is it reachable? Only when the user canSelect manager AND has an area-restricted scope (e.g., Gestor de Área). We need to check if Gestor de Área is among canSelect group (yes: canSelectSsmaEventResponsibleManager includes TAG_GESTOR_AREA). But note the same role would have getSsmaPreventionAreaScope restricted? That depends on whether the tag has an area limitation. Let me check ssmaPreventionAreaAuthorization->resolveScope behavior. Hmm, if it returns restricted for Gestor de Área with area set. Let's check. Also if Gestor de Área has no teams, then getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds — tag name not in team scope names; if area gestor tag has team_limitation maybe false. So scope null. So the server-side wouldn't intersect area. So yes, a Gestor de Área restricted to a specific area could set any company-wide leader as the responsible manager, bypassing the modal's area restriction. It's a data-isolation concern for manager assignment. Impact severity: moderate. But also the validation error message references "escopo de equipe/área" implying area should be enforced but isn't in the validate path. Wait — let me double-check: is validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope invoked for area-restricted gestor? It returns null if scope is null; area not considered. Yes. But also: the manager responsible field being set to someone outside area—does it actually grant extra permission/visibility? It ties the occurrence to a manager outside area. Could give that external manager visibility to the occurrence (since the list filter includes manager_id matches). And it violates the documented product rule. Worth reporting as medium. Actually wait, let me double check whether the modal options themselves are what gestor sees and server validate blocks a mismatch, but with direct crafted JSON they can bypass. Yes. Now let me look more carefully at applySsmaEventManagerAssignment for canSelect path and confirm area isn't considered. From the diff earlier: ``` $allowed = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company); $scope = $this->getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds($company, $user); if ($scope !== null) { $teamMembers = $scope === [] ? [] : $this->collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams($company, $scope); $allowed = array_intersect_key($allowed, $teamMembers); } if ($ownLeaderId !== null && $ownLeaderId > 0) { $allowed[$ownLeaderId] = true; } ``` Only team. Yes area not intersected. But we should confirm a Gestor de Área restricted case: does getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds return parsed teams for them? It might if tag->getTeamLimitation() is true; but area gestor tags would have area limitation. Since we can't be 100% sure, but the safer statement: The server-side assignment/validation doesn't apply the area restriction used by the modal list (which intersects area member ids). If the user is area-restricted, they could force a manager outside area via crafted request. That's real risk to report as medium. Let me also read the current applySsmaEventManagerAssignment function in file (added code) to verify lines. Let me read around 12230-12400 maybe. Let's search to get exact line numbers.
Tool Calls (3)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "private function applySsmaEventManagerAssignment"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
12294|    private function applySsmaEventManagerAssignment(

code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "private function buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
12248|    private function buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions(

code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "private function canSelectSsmaEventResponsibleManager"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
12137|    private function canSelectSsmaEventResponsibleManager(?Company $company, ?User $user): bool

Request #10 deepseek-v4-flash P:60.47K C:104 CR:60.29K CW:0 2069ms
Reasoning
Let me read 12100-12430 to view the new methods exactly.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 12090, "end_line": 12430}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 12090-12430
12090|                foreach ($peopleRaw as $pid) {
12091|                    $pid = (int) $pid;
12092|                    if ($pid > 0) {
12093|                        return $pid;
12094|                    }
12095|                }
12096|            }
12097|        }
12098|
12099|        if ($createdByUserId > 0) {
12100|            return $this->resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId($company, $createdByUserId);
12101|        }
12102|
12103|        return null;
12104|    }
12105|
12106|    private function resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId(Company $company, int $userId): ?int
12107|    {
12108|        if ($userId <= 0) {
12109|            return null;
12110|        }
12111|
12112|        $cacheKey = ((int) $company->getId()) . ':' . $userId;
12113|        if (array_key_exists($cacheKey, $this->ssmaMemberIdByUserIdCache)) {
12114|            return $this->ssmaMemberIdByUserIdCache[$cacheKey];
12115|        }
12116|
12117|        $members = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)
12118|            ->findBy(['company' => $company, 'user' => $userId, 'isRemoved' => 0]);
12119|
12120|        $resolved = null;
12121|        foreach ($members as $member) {
12122|            if ($member instanceof CompanyMembers) {
12123|                $resolved = (int) $member->getId();
12124|                break;
12125|            }
12126|        }
12127|
12128|        $this->ssmaMemberIdByUserIdCache[$cacheKey] = $resolved;
12129|
12130|        return $resolved;
12131|    }
12132|
12133|    /**
12134|     * Gestor (equipe/área/administrador) ou tenant/plataforma pode trocar o "Gestor responsável".
12135|     * Membro e supervisor não — o campo fica travado no líder imediato de quem está cadastrando.
12136|     */
12137|    private function canSelectSsmaEventResponsibleManager(?Company $company, ?User $user): bool
12138|    {
12139|        if (
12140|            $this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN')
12141|            || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER')
12142|            || $this->isGranted('ROLE_TENANT')
12143|        ) {
12144|            return true;
12145|        }
12146|        if (!$company || !$user) {
12147|            return false;
12148|        }
12149|
12150|        $member = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
12151|        if (!$member instanceof CompanyMembers) {
12152|            return false;
12153|        }
12154|        if ($this->memberIsSsmaGestorAdministrador($member)) {
12155|            return true;
12156|        }
12157|
12158|        $tagName = $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($member)?->getName();
12159|
12160|        return in_array($tagName, [
12161|            'Gestor de Equipe',
12162|            SsmaAreaLimitationScope::TAG_GESTOR_AREA,
12163|            'Gestor Administrador',
12164|        ], true);
12165|    }
12166|
12167|    private function resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId(Company $company, User $user): ?int
12168|    {
12169|        $member = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
12170|        if (!$member instanceof CompanyMembers) {
12171|            return null;
12172|        }
12173|
12174|        $superior = $member->getSuperior();
12175|        if (!$superior instanceof CompanyMembers || (int) $superior->getIsRemoved() === 1) {
12176|            return null;
12177|        }
12178|        if ($superior->getCompany()?->getId() !== $company->getId()) {
12179|            return null;
12180|        }
12181|
12182|        $id = (int) $superior->getId();
12183|
12184|        return $id > 0 ? $id : null;
12185|    }
12186|
12187|    /**
12188|     * Pessoas que são "Responsável" (superior) de pelo menos um colaborador ativo.
12189|     * Fonte: campo Responsável do cadastro em /my-company/members.
12190|     *
12191|     * @return array<int, true>
12192|     */
12193|    private function collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds(Company $company): array
12194|    {
12195|        if ($this->ssmaImmediateLeaderMemberIdsCache !== null) {
12196|            return $this->ssmaImmediateLeaderMemberIdsCache;
12197|        }
12198|
12199|        $set = [];
12200|        try {
12201|            $rows = $this->entityManager->createQueryBuilder()
12202|                ->select('DISTINCT IDENTITY(cm.superior) AS sid')
12203|                ->from(CompanyMembers::class, 'cm')
12204|                ->where('cm.company = :company')
12205|                ->andWhere('cm.isRemoved = 0')
12206|                ->andWhere('cm.superior IS NOT NULL')
12207|                ->setParameter('company', $company)
12208|                ->getQuery()
12209|                ->getArrayResult();
12210|            foreach ($rows as $row) {
12211|                $id = (int) ($row['sid'] ?? 0);
12212|                if ($id > 0) {
12213|                    $set[$id] = true;
12214|                }
12215|            }
12216|        } catch (\Throwable) {
12217|            $members = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)
12218|                ->findBy(['company' => $company, 'isRemoved' => 0]);
12219|            foreach ($members as $member) {
12220|                if (!$member instanceof CompanyMembers) {
12221|                    continue;
12222|                }
12223|                $superior = $member->getSuperior();
12224|                if ($superior instanceof CompanyMembers) {
12225|                    $sid = (int) $superior->getId();
12226|                    if ($sid > 0) {
12227|                        $set[$sid] = true;
12228|                    }
12229|                }
12230|            }
12231|        }
12232|
12233|        $this->ssmaImmediateLeaderMemberIdsCache = $set;
12234|
12235|        return $set;
12236|    }
12237|
12238|    /**
12239|     * Lista do select "Gestor responsável": líderes imediatos no escopo do gestor.
12240|     * Sempre inclui o líder imediato de quem está logado (default do cadastro).
12241|     *
12242|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $allMembers
12243|     * @param array<int, true>|null $scopeMemberIds
12244|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $occurrences
12245|     *
12246|     * @return list<array<string, mixed>>
12247|     */
12248|    private function buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions(
12249|        Company $company,
12250|        array $allMembers,
12251|        ?array $scopeMemberIds,
12252|        ?int $ownLeaderId,
12253|        array $occurrences = [],
12254|    ): array {
12255|        $leaderIds = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company);
12256|        $keep = $leaderIds;
12257|        if ($scopeMemberIds !== null) {
12258|            $keep = array_intersect_key($keep, $scopeMemberIds);
12259|        }
12260|        if ($ownLeaderId !== null && $ownLeaderId > 0) {
12261|            $keep[$ownLeaderId] = true;
12262|        }
12263|        foreach ($occurrences as $row) {
12264|            $mid = (int) ($row['manager_id'] ?? 0);
12265|            if ($mid > 0) {
12266|                $keep[$mid] = true;
12267|            }
12268|        }
12269|
12270|        $byId = [];
12271|        $memberById = [];
12272|        foreach ($allMembers as $m) {
12273|            $mid = (int) ($m['id'] ?? 0);
12274|            if ($mid > 0) {
12275|                $memberById[$mid] = $m;
12276|            }
12277|        }
12278|        foreach (array_keys($keep) as $memberId) {
12279|            $this->appendSsmaEventModalGestorRow($byId, (int) $memberId, $memberById, $company);
12280|        }
12281|
12282|        $list = array_values($byId);
12283|        usort($list, static fn (array $a, array $b): int => strcasecmp((string) ($a['name'] ?? ''), (string) ($b['name'] ?? '')));
12284|
12285|        return $list;
12286|    }
12287|
12288|    /**
12289|     * @param array<string, mixed> $data
12290|     * @param array<string, mixed>|null $existingDetails
12291|     *
12292|     * @return array<string, mixed>
12293|     */
12294|    private function applySsmaEventManagerAssignment(
12295|        array $data,
12296|        Company $company,
12297|        User $user,
12298|        ?array $existingDetails = null
12299|    ): array {
12300|        if (!isset($data['details']) || !is_array($data['details'])) {
12301|            $data['details'] = [];
12302|        }
12303|
12304|        $ownLeaderId = $this->resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId($company, $user);
12305|        $canSelect = $this->canSelectSsmaEventResponsibleManager($company, $user);
12306|        $existingManagerId = (int) ($existingDetails['manager_id'] ?? 0);
12307|        $requested = (int) ($data['details']['manager_id'] ?? 0);
12308|
12309|        if (!$canSelect) {
12310|            if ($existingManagerId > 0) {
12311|                $data['details']['manager_id'] = $existingManagerId;
12312|                return $data;
12313|            }
12314|            if ($ownLeaderId !== null && $ownLeaderId > 0) {
12315|                $data['details']['manager_id'] = $ownLeaderId;
12316|            }
12317|            return $data;
12318|        }
12319|
12320|        $allowed = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company);
12321|        $scope = $this->getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds($company, $user);
12322|        if ($scope !== null) {
12323|            $teamMembers = $scope === []
12324|                ? []
12325|                : $this->collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams($company, $scope);
12326|            $allowed = array_intersect_key($allowed, $teamMembers);
12327|        }
12328|        if ($ownLeaderId !== null && $ownLeaderId > 0) {
12329|            $allowed[$ownLeaderId] = true;
12330|        }
12331|
12332|        if ($requested > 0 && (isset($allowed[$requested]) || $requested === $existingManagerId)) {
12333|            $data['details']['manager_id'] = $requested;
12334|            return $data;
12335|        }
12336|
12337|        if ($existingManagerId > 0) {
12338|            $data['details']['manager_id'] = $existingManagerId;
12339|            return $data;
12340|        }
12341|        if ($ownLeaderId !== null && $ownLeaderId > 0) {
12342|            $data['details']['manager_id'] = $ownLeaderId;
12343|        }
12344|
12345|        return $data;
12346|    }
12347|
12348|    /**
12349|     * @param array<string, mixed> $row
12350|     *
12351|     * @return array<string, mixed>
12352|     */
12353|    private function enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback(array $row, Company $company): array
12354|    {
12355|        $createdByUserId = (int) ($row['created_by_id'] ?? 0);
12356|        $createdByMemberId = (int) ($row['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0);
12357|        if ($createdByMemberId <= 0 && $createdByUserId > 0) {
12358|            $createdByMemberId = (int) ($this->resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId($company, $createdByUserId) ?? 0);
12359|        }
12360|        if ($createdByMemberId > 0) {
12361|            $row['created_by_member_id'] = $createdByMemberId;
12362|        }
12363|
12364|        $managerId = (int) ($row['manager_id'] ?? 0);
12365|        if ($managerId <= 0 && $createdByMemberId > 0) {
12366|            $creator = $this->entityManager->find(CompanyMembers::class, $createdByMemberId);
12367|            $superior = $creator instanceof CompanyMembers ? $creator->getSuperior() : null;
12368|            if ($superior instanceof CompanyMembers && (int) $superior->getIsRemoved() !== 1) {
12369|                $row['manager_id'] = (int) $superior->getId();
12370|                $label = $this->ssmaMemberDisplayLabel($superior);
12371|                if ($label === '') {
12372|                    $label = (string) ($superior->getEmail() ?? '');
12373|                }
12374|                if ($label !== '') {
12375|                    $row['manager_display_name'] = $label;
12376|                }
12377|            }
12378|        }
12379|
12380|        return $row;
12381|    }
12382|
12383|    /**
12384|     * Eventos cadastrados pelo login atual entram na listagem mesmo fora do recorte de equipe.
12385|     *
12386|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $occurrences
12387|     *
12388|     * @return list<array<string, mixed>>
12389|     */
12390|    private function appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser(array $occurrences, Company $company, User $user): array
12391|    {
12392|        $userId = (int) $user->getId();
12393|        if ($userId <= 0) {
12394|            return $occurrences;
12395|        }
12396|
12397|        $existing = [];
12398|        foreach ($occurrences as $row) {
12399|            if (!empty($row['is_ssma_event'])) {
12400|                $id = (int) ($row['id'] ?? 0);
12401|                if ($id > 0) {
12402|                    $existing['e' . $id] = true;
12403|                }
12404|            }
12405|        }
12406|
12407|        $events = $this->entityManager->getRepository(SsmaEvent::class)
12408|            ->findBy(['company' => $company, 'createdById' => $userId], ['eventDatetime' => 'DESC']);
12409|        if ($events === []) {
12410|            return $occurrences;
12411|        }
12412|
12413|        [, $teams] = $this->loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite($company);
12414|        $teamsById = array_column($teams, null, 'id');
12415|
12416|        foreach ($events as $event) {
12417|            if (!$event instanceof SsmaEvent) {
12418|                continue;
12419|            }
12420|            $key = 'e' . (int) $event->getId();
12421|            if (isset($existing[$key])) {
12422|                continue;
12423|            }
12424|            $row = $this->mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow($event, $teamsById);
12425|            $occurrences[] = $this->enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback($row, $company);
12426|            $existing[$key] = true;
12427|        }
12428|
12429|        return $occurrences;
12430|    }
Request #11 deepseek-v4-flash P:64.58K C:380 CR:60.54K CW:0 3643ms
Reasoning
Now I have a fuller picture of the changed code. Let me think about issue #6 (template). Read occurrence_view.html.twig around lines 500-560 to understand member_by_id indexing. Let me see how member_by_id map is built. Let's read top part of the twig file to see how member_by_id is created. Search in file. Also check where created_by_member_id is added to member_by_id map - the template likely builds member_by_id from people_members? Actually the map 'member_by_id' key probably is indexed by `member_<id>`? In diff at line 525: `{% set created_by_member_key = created_by_lookup_id ? ('member_' ~ created_by_lookup_id) : '' %}`. So member_by_id uses keys like 'member_12'. Let's check how member_by_id built in that template, whether it includes all occurrences people plus created_by? Possibly built in the controller from `loadOccurrences`? Let's read the twig around where member_by_id is initialized.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig", "start_line": 440, "end_line": 545}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig (Total lines: 3231)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 440-545
440|            flex-direction: column;
441|            align-items: center;
442|            justify-content: center;
443|            gap: 10px;
444|        }
445|
446|        .ssma-occ-evidence-row .occ-view-drop-zone > span:not(.text-muted) {
447|            font-size: 14px !important;
448|            font-weight: 700 !important;
449|            color: #374151 !important;
450|            text-align: center;
451|            line-height: 1.3;
452|        }
453|
454|        .ssma-occ-evidence-row .occ-view-drop-zone > .text-muted {
455|            font-size: 12px !important;
456|            color: #8B9199 !important;
457|        }
458|
459|        #occ-view-procedures-list .occ-view-drop-zone {
460|            min-height: 160px;
461|        }
462|
463|        .ssma-evidence-card {
464|            transition: none !important;
465|            cursor: default;
466|            box-shadow: none !important;
467|        }
468|
469|        .ssma-evidence-card:hover {
470|            transform: none !important;
471|            border-color: #EEEFF4 !important;
472|            background-color: #FFFFFF !important;
473|            filter: none !important;
474|            opacity: 1 !important;
475|        }
476|
477|        .ssma-evidence-card *,
478|        .ssma-evidence-card:hover * {
479|            transition: none !important;
480|        }
481|
482|        .ssma-evidence-card .card-footer {
483|            border-top: 0 !important;
484|        }
485|
486|    </style>
487|{% endblock %}
488|
489|{% block container %}
490|{% set member_by_id = {} %}
491|{% for member in allMembers %}
492|    {% set member_by_id = member_by_id|merge({ ('member_' ~ member.id): member }) %}
493|{% endfor %}
494|
495|{% set severity_key       = occurrence.severity_value|default('') %}
496|{% set sev                = severity_map[severity_key] ?? { 'label': '—', 'dot': '#6c757d', 'bg_light': 'rgba(108,117,125,0.10)' } %}
497|{% set gravity_label      = occurrence.gravity_label|default(occurrence.potential_severity_label|default(sev.label)) %}
498|{% set guidance           = severity_guidance[severity_key] ?? null %}
499|{% set _occ_approval      = occurrence.occurrence_approval.status|default('') %}
500|{% set _is_rejected_occ   = occurrence.is_ssma_event|default(false) and _occ_approval == 'rejected' %}
501|{% set normalized_status  = _is_rejected_occ
502|    ? 'readequacao'
503|    : occurrence.status_value|default('')|replace({'-': '_'}) %}
504|{% set stat               = status_map[normalized_status] ?? { 'label': '—', 'dot': '#6c757d' } %}
505|{% set type_label         = type_labels[occurrence.type_value|default('')]       ?? occurrence.type_value|default('—') %}
506|{% set nature_label       = nature_labels[occurrence.nature_value|default('')]   ?? occurrence.nature_value|default('—') %}
507|{% set approach_label     = approach_labels[occurrence.approach_value|default('')] ?? occurrence.approach_value|default('—') %}
508|{% set gmr_label          = occurrence.gmr|default('') != '' ? occurrence.gmr : 'Não informado' %}
509|{% set category_label     = occurrence.category|default('') != '' ? occurrence.category : 'Não informado' %}
510|{% set location_label     = location_labels[occurrence.location_value|default('')] ?? occurrence.location_value|default('—') %}
511|{% set responsible_id     = occurrence.responsible_ids|default([])|first %}
512|{% set manager_member_key = occurrence.manager_id is defined ? ('member_' ~ occurrence.manager_id) : '' %}
513|{% set manager_member     = manager_member_key and member_by_id[manager_member_key] is defined ? member_by_id[manager_member_key] : null %}
514|{% set team_name = '—' %}
515|{% for team in teams %}
516|    {% if team.id == occurrence.team_id %}{% set team_name = team.name %}{% endif %}
517|{% endfor %}
518|{% set people_members = [] %}
519|{% for person_id in occurrence.people_ids|default([]) %}
520|    {% set person_key = 'member_' ~ person_id %}
521|    {% if member_by_id[person_key] is defined %}
522|        {% set people_members = people_members|merge([member_by_id[person_key]]) %}
523|    {% endif %}
524|{% endfor %}
525|{% set is_ros_occurrence = occurrence.type_value|default('') == 'ROS' %}
526|{% set created_by_lookup_id = occurrence.created_by_member_id|default(occurrence.created_by_id|default(null)) %}
527|{% set created_by_member_key = created_by_lookup_id ? ('member_' ~ created_by_lookup_id) : '' %}
528|{% set created_by_member = created_by_member_key and member_by_id[created_by_member_key] is defined ? member_by_id[created_by_member_key] : null %}
529|{% set reported_by_member = created_by_member ?: manager_member %}
530|{% set witness_members = [] %}
531|{% for witness_id in occurrence.witness_ids|default([]) %}
532|    {% set witness_key = 'member_' ~ witness_id %}
533|    {% if member_by_id[witness_key] is defined %}
534|        {% set witness_members = witness_members|merge([member_by_id[witness_key]]) %}
535|    {% endif %}
536|{% endfor %}
537|{% set responsible_member_key = responsible_id is not null ? ('member_' ~ responsible_id) : '' %}
538|{% set evidence_uploader_member = responsible_member_key and member_by_id[responsible_member_key] is defined
539|    ? member_by_id[responsible_member_key]
540|    : manager_member %}
541|{% set evidence_chip_initials = [] %}
542|{% if people_members|length > 0 %}
543|    {% set evidence_chip_initials = evidence_chip_initials|merge([people_members[0].name|default('R')|slice(0, 1)|upper]) %}
544|{% endif %}
545|{% if evidence_uploader_member and evidence_uploader_member.name|default('') != '' %}
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "member_by_id", "file_patterns": ["templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig"]}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig
Match lines: 16
490|{% set member_by_id = {} %}
492|    {% set member_by_id = member_by_id|merge({ ('member_' ~ member.id): member }) %}
513|{% set manager_member     = manager_member_key and member_by_id[manager_member_key] is defined ? member_by_id[manager_member_key] : null %}
521|    {% if member_by_id[person_key] is defined %}
522|        {% set people_members = people_members|merge([member_by_id[person_key]]) %}
528|{% set created_by_member = created_by_member_key and member_by_id[created_by_member_key] is defined ? member_by_id[created_by_member_key] : null %}
533|    {% if member_by_id[witness_key] is defined %}
534|        {% set witness_members = witness_members|merge([member_by_id[witness_key]]) %}
538|{% set evidence_uploader_member = responsible_member_key and member_by_id[responsible_member_key] is defined
539|    ? member_by_id[responsible_member_key]
906|                {% set area_resp_member = area_resp_key and member_by_id[area_resp_key] is defined ? member_by_id[area_resp_key] : null %}
967|                            member_by_id: member_by_id,
1010|                        {% set _mem = _memKey and member_by_id[_memKey] is defined ? member_by_id[_memKey] : null %}
1163|                                        {% if member_by_id[responsible_key] is defined %}
1164|                                            {% set responsible_members = responsible_members|merge([member_by_id[responsible_key]]) %}
1170|                                        member_by_id: member_by_id

Request #12 deepseek-v4-flash P:66.94K C:586 CR:64.9K CW:0 5365ms
Reasoning
member_by_id is built from `allMembers`, with keys `member_<member id>`. Note allMembers are CompanyMembers presumably (id of member). `created_by_member_id` now resolves CompanyMembers id. Prior code used `created_by_id` as a CompanyMembers key? Actually previously the code used `occurrence.created_by_id` and treated it as member id key `'member_' ~ created_by_id`. That was the bug (#4b) where created_by_id was a user id, not a member id. Now changed to resolve created_by_member_id. The map keys are member ids. So correct if the row has created_by_member_id (they now map it in mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow). But older events in list loaded by loadOccurrences SQL—do they include created_by_member_id? The added fallback in enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback resolves created_by_id→member id only when created_by_member_id <=0. But is enrichOccurrenceManagerFields (which now calls enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback) called on all rows in occurrence detail view? The occurrence_view shows a single occurrence. The data passed into template from controller buildOccurrenceView? Let's examine how occurrence data is passed to this view (occurrence_view.html.twig). Where is member_by_id's allMembers; occurrence array. Need to check whether the "Responsável pelo cadastro" would properly resolve for the occurrence being displayed. This requires occurrence['created_by_member_id'] be populated. If the controller builds occurrence row via mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow or via SQL with created_by_member_id resolved. If not, falls back to created_by_id user id → key 'member_<userid>'. But member_by_id index uses member IDs. If user id happens to differ from member id → created_by_member null → reported_by falls back to manager. Display label would then show manager as "Responsável pelo cadastro", incorrect. Is enrichOccurrenceManagerFields applied to the occurrence detail row? Let me check how occurrence_view data is built (the function around occurrence_view action). Search for "occurrence_view" route function. Let me search where occurrence data is built and where member_by_id is set in the controller to pass allMembers to template. Let's look at the action that renders occurrence_view.html.twig.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "occurrence_view.html.twig"}
File: .opencodereview/rule.json
Match lines: 2
106|      "path": "templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig",
111|      "path": "templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig",

File: .opencodereview/rules/ssma/occurrence-approve.md
Match lines: 1
7|- `templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig` — modal `#ssmaOccurrenceApproveModal` e `sendDecision`

File: .opencodereview/rules/ssma/occurrence-ros-aprofundamento-readonly.md
Match lines: 2
6|- `templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig` — clique em `+ Aprofundamento` / `.js-occ-view-aprofundamento-btn`; envia `_can_edit_aprofundamento` a partir de `can_aprofundamento.can_edit`
32|**View (`occurrence_view.html.twig`):**

File: CONFLITOS_REAIS_DYNAMIC_COLOR_ICONS.md
Match lines: 5
19|### 1️⃣ `templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig` (Linha ~449)
77|### Passo 1: Editar `templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig`
110|git add templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig
227|git add templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig
246|> 1. `occurrence_view.html.twig` - apenas nome de classe CSS

File: docs/engineering/pr/feature-ssma-ocorrencia-correcoes-new-production/PR_descricao_feature-ssma-ocorrencia-correcoes-new-production.md
Match lines: 1
29|- `occurrence_view.html.twig`, `_tab_occurrences.html.twig`, `_modal_event.html.twig` — Readequação, validação, suspeita/caracterizar só para médico (`.is-doctor-aprof`), Reprovar com cor da plataforma

File: docs/engineering/pr/hotfix-ssma-ambiental-material-brenda-new-production/PR_descricao_hotfix-ssma-ambiental-material-brenda-new-production.md
Match lines: 2
44|- Detalhe `occurrence_view.html.twig` — Editar restrito a tenant/super admin.
88|| `occurrence_view.html.twig` | Editar só `ROLE_TENANT` / `ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN` |

File: docs/engineering/pr/hotfix-ssma-ap-validacao-etapa1-new-production/PR_arquivos_hotfix-ssma-ap-validacao-etapa1-new-production.txt
Match lines: 1
221|M	templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig

File: docs/engineering/pr/hotfix-ssma-ap-validacao-etapa1-new-production/PR_impacto_hotfix-ssma-ap-validacao-etapa1-new-production.txt
Match lines: 1
221| .../ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig      |  300 +-

File: docs/engineering/pr/hotfix-ssma-occ-type-perms-datatables-new-production/PR_arquivos_hotfix-ssma-occ-type-perms-datatables-new-production.txt
Match lines: 1
6|M	templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig

File: docs/engineering/pr/hotfix-ssma-occ-type-perms-datatables-new-production/PR_descricao_hotfix-ssma-occ-type-perms-datatables-new-production.md
Match lines: 1
92|| `templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig` | Botão **+Aprofundamento** para especialistas |

File: docs/engineering/pr/hotfix-ssma-occ-type-perms-datatables-new-production/PR_impacto_hotfix-ssma-occ-type-perms-datatables-new-production.txt
Match lines: 1
6| .../ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig      |  50 ++-

File: docs/engineering/pr/hotfix-ssma-ros-barrier-type-422/PR_descricao_hotfix-ssma-ros-barrier-type-422.md
Match lines: 1
50|| Flash report | `occurrence_view.html.twig`, `_modal_event.html.twig`, `_tab_config.html.twig`, `new_automation.html.twig` |

File: docs/engineering/pr/new_staging2/PR_arquivos_new_staging2.txt
Match lines: 1
1623|M	templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig

File: docs/engineering/pr/new_staging2/PR_impacto_new_staging2.txt
Match lines: 1
1623| .../ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig      |  178 +-

File: docs/ssma/PENDENCIAS-SSMA.md
Match lines: 1
84|- [ ] Flash report **abrir/baixar** no modal (sem e-mail) — implementado em `occurrence_view.html.twig`.

File: docs/ssma/engineering/ssma-permissoes-ocorrencia-auditoria-2026-09.md
Match lines: 2
132|Consumidores de `can_approve_occurrence` no Twig (`occurrence_view.html.twig`, linhas ~718,
176|   (`occurrence_view.html.twig`).

File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
3519|        return $this->render('ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig', array_merge($viewData, [

File: templates/ssma/partials/_ssma_body_map_entry.html.twig
Match lines: 1
10|  - occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig        → mapa readonly (view sem permissão de editar)

File: tests/Ssma/SsmaPermissionsRegressionTest.php
Match lines: 1
61|        $this->occurrenceView = $root . '/templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig';

File: tests/Ssma/ssma_performance_fase_d_standalone.php
Match lines: 1
15|$occView = file_get_contents($root . '/templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig');

File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaBodyMapEntryRegressionTest.php
Match lines: 1
56|        $view = $this->read('templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig');

File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/assert_branch_ui_fixes.php
Match lines: 2
141|$occView = $root . '/templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig';
287|$occView = $root . '/templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig';

File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/assert_flash_report_flow.php
Match lines: 1
37|$occView = $root . '/templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig';

code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "created_by_member_id"}
File: docs/plano_integracao_alertas_painel_efetividade.md
Match lines: 8
19|As ações de alertas existem em outro fluxo. O plano é salvo em `risk_indicator_manager_context`, com `context_type = signal_action_plan`. Após o merge de `fix/acoes-alertas`, o JSON persistido é significativamente mais rico: o plano mantém responsável, prazo e autor no nível do plano; cada passo NEURAL novo passa a ter **autoria individual server-side** (`created_by_user_id`, `created_by_member_id`, `created_by_name`, `created_at` em ISO 8601) e **avaliação imutável por outro gestor** (`evaluation` com `note`, `satisfaction`, `evidence`, `evaluated_by_*`, `evaluated_at`, `status = "resolved"`). A branch auditada agora contém `NeuralAlertActionPlanApplicationService`, `NeuralAlertStepEvaluationService` e `NeuralAlertStepEvidenceStorage`, com transação, lock de linha e `context_version` para concorrência otimista. Evidência em imagem é persistida em storage privado via `StorageDriverInterface` e servida por rota dedicada com `Cache-Control: private, no-store`.
24|2. **Não existe UI de seleção de avaliador.** O avaliador é sempre o usuário autenticado; o backend bloqueia autoavaliação comparando `created_by_user_id`/`created_by_member_id` com o usuário da sessão.
258|      "created_by_member_id": 456,
272|      "created_by_member_id": 456,
313|| Autoria individual do passo | **Existe (NEURAL novo)** | `created_by_user_id`, `created_by_member_id`, `created_by_name` |
405|`canEvaluateNeuralAlertStep` bloqueia explicitamente autoavaliação comparando `created_by_user_id` e `created_by_member_id` com o usuário da sessão. Não há método dedicado para visualização de evidência; o acesso à rota GET de evidência valida `canViewSignal` + tipo NEURAL + escopo do path (`company_{id}/signal_{hash}/step_{hash}`).
462|| Autoria individual do passo | JSON do plano | mesma | `steps[].created_by_user_id`, `created_by_member_id`, `created_by_name`, `created_at` | Server-side, NEURAL novo | Existe (NEURAL novo) | Legados sem autoria não são avaliáveis |
904|        'created_by_member_id' => 456,

File: docs/ssma/engineering/ssma-permissoes-ocorrencia-auditoria-2026-09.md
Match lines: 1
190|  `created_by_id` (User) → `created_by_member_id` e a listagem anexa os eventos do login.

File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 6
11680|        $createdByMemberId = (int) ($occurrence['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0);
12356|        $createdByMemberId = (int) ($row['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0);
12361|            $row['created_by_member_id'] = $createdByMemberId;
13311|                if ($viewerMemberIdForCreated > 0 && (int) ($o['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0) === $viewerMemberIdForCreated) {
14966|            $add($row['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0);
15590|            'created_by_member_id'   => $this->resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId($e->getCompany(), $e->getCreatedById()),

File: src/Service/Effectiveness/Alert/NeuralAlertActionNormalizer.php
Match lines: 3
338|                'created_by_member_id' => ($step['created_by_member_id'] ?? null) !== null
339|                    ? (int) $step['created_by_member_id']
374|                foreach (['created_by_member_id', 'evaluated_by_member_id'] as $field) {

File: src/Service/Effectiveness/Alert/NeuralAlertEvidenceConfidenceCalculator.php
Match lines: 2
117|        $createdByMemberId = (int) ($metadata['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0);
136|            || (int) ($metadata['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0) > 0;

File: src/Service/Effectiveness/Behavioral/BehavioralActionNormalizer.php
Match lines: 3
260|                'author_member_id' => isset($payload['created_by_member_id']) && $payload['created_by_member_id'] !== null
261|                    ? (int) $payload['created_by_member_id']
301|            'created_by_member_id' => $draft['metadata']['author_member_id'] ?? null,

File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/BehavioralIndicatorActionPlanApplicationService.php
Match lines: 4
163|                'created_by_member_id' => $actorMetadata['member_id'],
250|                'created_by_member_id',
443|                'created_by_member_id' => (int) ($step['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0) ?: null,
495|            'author_member_id' => (int) ($payload['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0) ?: null,

File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/NeuralAlertActionPlanApplicationService.php
Match lines: 2
226|                && (int) ($persistedStep['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0) > 0
227|                && (int) $persistedStep['created_by_member_id'] === (int) $evaluatorMember->getId();

File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/NeuralAlertStepEvaluationService.php
Match lines: 2
86|                'created_by_member_id' => ($actor['member_id'] ?? null) !== null
340|        foreach (['created_by_user_id', 'created_by_member_id', 'created_by_name', 'created_at'] as $field) {

File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/RiskIntelligenceSignalPermissionResolver.php
Match lines: 4
155|            || (int) ($persistedStep['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0) <= 0
156|            || (int) $persistedStep['created_by_member_id'] !== (int) $companyMember->getId();
186|            && (int) ($persistedStep['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0) > 0
187|            && (int) $persistedStep['created_by_member_id'] === (int) $companyMember->getId()

File: templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig
Match lines: 1
526|{% set created_by_lookup_id = occurrence.created_by_member_id|default(occurrence.created_by_id|default(null)) %}

File: tests/Controller/DecisionSystem/RiskIntelligence/BehavioralIndicatorActionControllerTest.php
Match lines: 2
365|            'created_by_member_id' => 20,
407|                'created_by_member_id' => 20,

File: tests/Service/PeopleAnalytics/BehavioralIndicatorActionPlanApplicationServiceTest.php
Match lines: 7
79|        self::assertSame(20, $manualPayload['created_by_member_id']);
106|        self::assertSame(20, $view['actions'][0]['steps'][0]['created_by_member_id']);
124|        $step['created_by_member_id'] = null;
127|        $payload['created_by_member_id'] = null;
140|        self::assertNull($view['actions'][0]['steps'][0]['created_by_member_id']);
583|            'created_by_member_id' => 20,
631|                'created_by_member_id' => 20,

File: tests/Service/PeopleAnalytics/NeuralAlertActionPlanApplicationServiceTest.php
Match lines: 2
258|        self::assertSame(20, $step['created_by_member_id']);
395|            'created_by_member_id' => 20,

File: tests/Service/PeopleAnalytics/NeuralAlertStepEvaluationServiceTest.php
Match lines: 4
42|        self::assertSame(20, $steps[0]['created_by_member_id']);
74|                'created_by_member_id' => 999,
85|        self::assertSame($persisted['created_by_member_id'], $steps[0]['created_by_member_id']);
243|            'created_by_member_id' => 20,

File: tests/Service/PeopleAnalytics/RiskIntelligenceSignalPermissionResolverTest.php
Match lines: 2
556|            'created_by_member_id' => $memberId,
576|                'created_by_member_id' => $authorMemberId,

File: tests/Service/PeopleAnalytics/RiskSignalsPresenterTest.php
Match lines: 1
237|            'created_by_member_id' => 20,

File: tests/Ssma/ssma_event_manager_leader_rule_standalone.php
Match lines: 1
88|ok('Criador volta a ver se created_by_member_id == ele', 10 === 10);

File: tests/Unit/Product/Alert/NeuralAlertActionNormalizerTest.php
Match lines: 1
181|                    'created_by_member_id' => 5,

File: tests/Unit/Product/Alert/NeuralAlertActionPlanReaderTest.php
Match lines: 4
55|                    '{"steps":[{"id":"eval","label":"Avaliada","created_by_user_id":1,"created_by_member_id":2,"created_by_name":"Criador","created_at":"2026-01-01T00:00:00+00:00","evaluation":{"evaluated_at":"2026-02-01T00:00:00+00:00","satisfaction":"bom","status":"evaluated","evaluated_by_member_id":3,"evaluated_by_name":"Gestor"}}]}',
73|                    '{"steps":[{"id":"resolved-eval","label":"Resolvida avaliada","created_by_user_id":1,"created_by_member_id":2,"created_by_name":"Criador","created_at":"2026-01-01T00:00:00+00:00","evaluation":{"evaluated_at":"2026-02-01T00:00:00+00:00","satisfaction":"otimo","status":"evaluated","evaluated_by_member_id":3,"evaluated_by_name":"Gestor"}}]}',
91|                    '{"steps":[{"id":"resolved-done","label":"Concluída","completed":true,"created_by_user_id":1,"created_by_member_id":2,"created_by_name":"Criador","created_at":"2026-01-01T00:00:00+00:00"}]}',
225|                    '{"steps":[{"id":"old","label":"Histórica","created_by_user_id":1,"created_by_member_id":2,"created_by_name":"Criador","created_at":"2024-06-01T00:00:00+00:00","evaluation":{"evaluated_at":"2024-07-01T00:00:00+00:00","satisfaction":"bom","status":"evaluated","evaluated_by_member_id":3,"evaluated_by_name":"Gestor"}}]}',

File: tests/Unit/Product/Alert/NeuralAlertEvidenceConfidenceCalculatorTest.php
Match lines: 5
27|                'created_by_member_id' => 1,
48|                'created_by_member_id' => 1,
69|                'created_by_member_id' => 2,
88|                'created_by_member_id' => 1,
152|                'created_by_member_id' => 1,

File: tests/Unit/Product/Dimension/AlertEffectivenessProviderTest.php
Match lines: 1
49|                    'created_by_member_id' => 2,

File: tests/Unit/Product/Effectiveness/EffectivenessAnalyticalContractPropagationTest.php
Match lines: 1
29|                'created_by_member_id' => 10,

Request #13 deepseek-v4-flash P:71.98K C:205 CR:67.46K CW:0 2480ms
Reasoning
Let me look at the controller line ~3519 render for occurrence_view to understand what data provides occurrence fields and allMembers. Also where "manager_id" etc come from in the occurrence view (probably from the `enrichOccurrenceManagerFields` function used in loadOccurrences for the detail). Let me find the occurrence detail building code (the controller method at ~3500).
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 3400, "end_line": 3530}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 3400-3530
3400|
3401|        $isSsmaEventRow = (bool) ($occurrence['is_ssma_event'] ?? false);
3402|        $user    = $this->getUser();
3403|        $company = $user instanceof User ? $user->getCompany() : null;
3404|        $this->maybeAutoFinalizeOccurrenceRowIfAllActionsClosed($occurrence, $company);
3405|        $this->syncOccurrenceRowStatusFromDatabase($occurrence, $company);
3406|
3407|        $today = new \DateTimeImmutable('today');
3408|        foreach ($viewData['actions_taken'] as $actionItem) {
3409|            if ($isSsmaEventRow) {
3410|                if ((int) ($actionItem['event_id'] ?? 0) !== $id) {
3411|                    continue;
3412|                }
3413|            } elseif ((int) ($actionItem['occurrence_id'] ?? 0) !== $id) {
3414|                continue;
3415|            }
3416|            $occurrenceActions[] = $this->enrichOccurrenceViewActionCard($actionItem, $actionTypeLabels, $today);
3417|        }
3418|
3419|        $history = $occurrence['history'] ?? [];
3420|        if (($occurrence['is_ssma_event'] ?? false) === true) {
3421|            $eventEntity = $this->entityManager->getRepository(SsmaEvent::class)->find($id);
3422|            if ($eventEntity instanceof SsmaEvent && $company && $eventEntity->getCompany()->getId() === $company->getId()) {
3423|                foreach ($eventEntity->getHistory() as $hItem) {
3424|                    if (is_array($hItem)) {
3425|                        $history[] = $hItem;
3426|                    }
3427|                }
3428|            }
3429|        } else {
3430|            // Mescla o changelog de auditoria (tipo, gravidade) armazenado em details
3431|            $occurrenceEntity = $this->entityManager->getRepository(SsmaOccurrence::class)->find($id);
3432|            if ($occurrenceEntity instanceof SsmaOccurrence) {
3433|                $changelog = $occurrenceEntity->getDetails()['changelog'] ?? [];
3434|                foreach ($changelog as $cItem) {
3435|                    if (is_array($cItem) && isset($cItem['message'])) {
3436|                        $history[] = $cItem;
3437|                    }
3438|                }
3439|            }
3440|        }
3441|        foreach ($occurrenceActions as $actionItem) {
3442|            $createdAt = (string) ($actionItem['created_at'] ?? '');
3443|            $title = trim((string) ($actionItem['title'] ?? ''));
3444|            if ($createdAt !== '' && $title !== '') {
3445|                $history[] = [
3446|                    'date' => (new \DateTimeImmutable($createdAt))->format('d/m/Y'),
3447|                    'label' => 'Ação criada: ' . $title,
3448|                ];
3449|            }
3450|        }
3451|        // Ordena do mais recente para o mais antigo (data mais recente no topo do histórico).
3452|        usort($history, function (array $a, array $b): int {
3453|            return $this->occurrenceHistoryEntryTimestamp($b) <=> $this->occurrenceHistoryEntryTimestamp($a);
3454|        });
3455|        $occurrence['history'] = $history;
3456|
3457|        $occurrence = $this->filterOccurrenceEvidencesForCurrentUser($occurrence, false);
3458|
3459|        $occurrence = $this->enrichOccurrenceEvidencesForView($occurrence);
3460|
3461|        if (($occurrence['is_ssma_event'] ?? false) === true && $company instanceof Company) {
3462|            $eventEntity = $this->entityManager->getRepository(SsmaEvent::class)->find($id);
3463|            if ($eventEntity instanceof SsmaEvent && $eventEntity->getCompany()->getId() === $company->getId()) {
3464|                $flash = $eventEntity->getDetails()['flash_report'] ?? [];
3465|                $occurrence['flash_report'] = is_array($flash) ? $flash : [];
3466|                if ($user instanceof User) {
3467|                    $this->maybeSubmitOccurrenceForValidation($eventEntity, $company, $user);
3468|                }
3469|                $occurrence['occurrence_approval'] = $this->ssmaOccurrenceApprovalService->getState($eventEntity);
3470|                $details = $eventEntity->getDetails();
3471|                if (is_array($details)) {
3472|                    $occurrence['work_leave'] = (string) ($details['work_leave'] ?? $occurrence['work_leave'] ?? '');
3473|                    $occurrence['injury_classification'] = (string) ($details['injury_classification'] ?? $occurrence['injury_classification'] ?? '');
3474|                }
3475|            }
3476|        }
3477|
3478|        $occurrence['work_leave_label'] = $this->ssmaReportWorkLeaveLabel($occurrence['work_leave'] ?? '');
3479|        $occurrence['injury_classification_label'] = $this->ssmaReportInjuryClassificationLabel(
3480|            (string) ($occurrence['injury_classification'] ?? '')
3481|        );
3482|        // Mesma escala do formulário (Leve/Baixo/Médio/Alto/Severo) — não o slug 4 níveis (grave).
3483|        $occurrence['gravity_label'] = $this->resolveSsmaOccurrenceGravityLabel($occurrence);
3484|        $potSevRaw = trim((string) ($occurrence['potential_severity'] ?? ''));
3485|        if ($potSevRaw !== '') {
3486|            $occurrence['potential_severity_label'] = $this->ssmaReportPotentialSeverityLabel($potSevRaw);
3487|        }
3488|
3489|        $canSubmitFlashReport = false;
3490|        $canDirectSendFlashReport = false;
3491|        if (($occurrence['is_ssma_event'] ?? false) === true && $company instanceof Company && $user instanceof User) {
3492|            $flashPerms = $this->resolveSsmaFlashReportUiPermissions(
3493|                $company,
3494|                $user,
3495|                [],
3496|                (bool) ($viewData['ssma_is_gestor_user'] ?? false)
3497|            );
3498|            $canSubmitFlashReport = $flashPerms['can_submit'];
3499|            $canDirectSendFlashReport = $flashPerms['can_direct_send'];
3500|        }
3501|
3502|        // Responsável da área / do local (mapa location_responsibles + fallback CompanyArea por nome).
3503|        if ($company instanceof Company) {
3504|            $occurrence = $this->enrichOccurrenceAreaResponsible($occurrence, $company, $viewData['allMembers'] ?? []);
3505|        }
3506|
3507|        // Cards de aprofundamento técnico do tipo (ROS / Quase Acidente / acidentes).
3508|        $occurrenceTypeKey = (string) ($occurrence['type_value'] ?? '');
3509|        $occurrenceTechTags = [];
3510|        foreach ($viewData['ssma_perm_tags'] ?? [] as $tagRow) {
3511|            if (!is_array($tagRow)) {
3512|                continue;
3513|            }
3514|            if ((string) ($tagRow['occurrence_type_key'] ?? '') === $occurrenceTypeKey) {
3515|                $occurrenceTechTags[] = $tagRow;
3516|            }
3517|        }
3518|
3519|        return $this->render('ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig', array_merge($viewData, [
3520|            'occurrence'         => $occurrence,
3521|            'occurrence_actions' => $occurrenceActions,
3522|            'occurrence_tech_tags' => $occurrenceTechTags,
3523|            'ros_call_priority'  => $viewData['ros_call_priority']
3524|                ?? \App\Service\Ssma\SsmaOccurrenceTypeConfigService::ROS_CALL_PRIORITY_LOCATION_DIRECT,
3525|            'can_aprofundamento' => $this->resolveOccurrenceViewAprofundamentoFlags(
3526|                $occurrence,
3527|                $company,
3528|                $user instanceof User ? $user : null
3529|            ),
3530|            'can_submit_flash_report' => $canSubmitFlashReport,
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "enrichOccurrenceManagerFields("}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 5
14916|            $result[$idx] = $this->enrichOccurrenceManagerFields($row, $membersById, $company);
15222|                $result[$idx] = $this->enrichOccurrenceManagerFields($row, $membersById, $company);
15341|            $result[$idx] = $this->enrichOccurrenceManagerFields($row, $membersById, $company);
22760|                $all[]                 = $this->enrichOccurrenceManagerFields($row, $membersById, $netCompany);
28626|    private function enrichOccurrenceManagerFields(array $row, array $membersById, ?Company $company = null): array

Request #14 deepseek-v4-flash P:74.49K C:322 CR:72.06K CW:0 2843ms
Reasoning
Line 14916/15222/15341 are within mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow? Let me look at lines 14900-15400 to see how rows are built and where enrichOccurrenceManagerFields is applied, and whether loadOccurrences also covers events for the occurrence detail view. Let me look at the occurrence detail page flow, where the `$occurrence` comes from: the detail is an SSMA event or legacy occurrence. Let me read function that loads occurrence for detail. Search around loadOccurrences function. But first, let me read mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow region (15470) and enrichOccurrenceManagerFields region (28626), including the fallback to created_by_member_id resolution.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 28620, "end_line": 28710}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 28620-28710
28620|
28621|    /**
28622|     * @param array<int, array<string, mixed>> $membersById
28623|     *
28624|     * @return array<string, mixed>
28625|     */
28626|    private function enrichOccurrenceManagerFields(array $row, array $membersById, ?Company $company = null): array
28627|    {
28628|        if ($company instanceof Company) {
28629|            $row = $this->enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback($row, $company);
28630|        }
28631|
28632|        $managerId = (int) ($row['manager_id'] ?? 0);
28633|        $managerName = trim((string) ($row['manager_name'] ?? ''));
28634|
28635|        if ($managerId > 0 && isset($membersById[$managerId])) {
28636|            $m = $membersById[$managerId];
28637|            $row['manager_display_name'] = (string) ($m['name'] ?? '');
28638|            $row['manager_position'] = (string) ($m['position'] ?? '');
28639|
28640|            return $row;
28641|        }
28642|
28643|        if ($managerName === '' && $managerId > 0 && $company instanceof Company) {
28644|            $member = $this->entityManager->find(CompanyMembers::class, $managerId);
28645|            if ($member instanceof CompanyMembers && $member->getCompany()?->getId() === $company->getId()) {
28646|                $managerName = $this->ssmaMemberDisplayLabel($member);
28647|                if ($managerName === '') {
28648|                    $managerName = (string) ($member->getEmail() ?? '');
28649|                }
28650|            }
28651|        }
28652|
28653|        if ($managerName !== '') {
28654|            $resolvedId = $this->resolveCompanyMemberIdByDisplayLabel($managerName, $membersById);
28655|            if ($resolvedId > 0) {
28656|                $row['manager_id'] = $resolvedId;
28657|                if (isset($membersById[$resolvedId])) {
28658|                    $m = $membersById[$resolvedId];
28659|                    $row['manager_display_name'] = (string) ($m['name'] ?? $managerName);
28660|                    $row['manager_position'] = (string) ($m['position'] ?? '');
28661|
28662|                    return $row;
28663|                }
28664|            }
28665|            $row['manager_display_name'] = $managerName;
28666|
28667|            return $row;
28668|        }
28669|
28670|        if ($managerId > 0 && $company instanceof Company) {
28671|            $member = $this->entityManager->find(CompanyMembers::class, $managerId);
28672|            if ($member instanceof CompanyMembers && $member->getCompany()?->getId() === $company->getId()) {
28673|                $label = $this->ssmaMemberDisplayLabel($member);
28674|                if ($label === '') {
28675|                    $label = (string) ($member->getEmail() ?? '');
28676|                }
28677|                if ($label !== '') {
28678|                    $row['manager_display_name'] = $label;
28679|                }
28680|            }
28681|        }
28682|
28683|        return $row;
28684|    }
28685|
28686|    /**
28687|     * @param array<int, array<string, mixed>> $membersById
28688|     */
28689|    private function resolveCompanyMemberIdByDisplayLabel(string $label, array $membersById): int
28690|    {
28691|        $needle = mb_strtolower(trim($label));
28692|        if ($needle === '') {
28693|            return 0;
28694|        }
28695|
28696|        foreach ($membersById as $id => $memberRow) {
28697|            $name = mb_strtolower(trim((string) ($memberRow['name'] ?? '')));
28698|            if ($name !== '' && $name === $needle) {
28699|                return (int) $id;
28700|            }
28701|        }
28702|
28703|        return 0;
28704|    }
28705|
28706|    public function listMembersJson(): JsonResponse
28707|    {
28708|        /** @var User|null $user */
28709|        $user = $this->getUser();
28710|        if (!$user) {
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 15440, "end_line": 15610}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 15440-15610
15440|        );
15441|
15442|        return $occ + $evt;
15443|    }
15444|
15445|    /**
15446|     * Formato compatível com cards/tabela de ocorrências (legado).
15447|     *
15448|     * @param array<string, array<string, mixed>> $teamsById
15449|     *
15450|     * @return array<string, mixed>
15451|     */
15452|    /**
15453|     * @return int[]
15454|     */
15455|    private function ssmaExtractIdListFromDetails(mixed $raw): array
15456|    {
15457|        if (empty($raw)) {
15458|            return [];
15459|        }
15460|        if (is_string($raw)) {
15461|            $raw = explode(',', $raw);
15462|        }
15463|        if (!is_array($raw)) {
15464|            return [];
15465|        }
15466|
15467|        return array_values(array_filter(array_map('intval', $raw)));
15468|    }
15469|
15470|    private function mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow(SsmaEvent $e, array $teamsById): array
15471|    {
15472|        $details = $e->getDetails();
15473|        $strategic = (string) ($details['strategic_nature'] ?? '');
15474|        $natureSlug = $this->strategicNatureCodeToListSlug($strategic);
15475|
15476|        $peopleIds = [];
15477|        if (!empty($details['people_ids'])) {
15478|            if (is_string($details['people_ids'])) {
15479|                $peopleIds = array_values(array_filter(array_map('intval', explode(',', $details['people_ids']))));
15480|            } elseif (is_array($details['people_ids'])) {
15481|                $peopleIds = array_values(array_filter(array_map('intval', $details['people_ids'])));
15482|            }
15483|        }
15484|
15485|        $responsibleIds = [];
15486|        if (!empty($details['responsible_ids'])) {
15487|            if (is_string($details['responsible_ids'])) {
15488|                $responsibleIds = array_values(array_filter(array_map('intval', explode(',', $details['responsible_ids']))));
15489|            } elseif (is_array($details['responsible_ids'])) {
15490|                $responsibleIds = array_values(array_filter(array_map('intval', $details['responsible_ids'])));
15491|            }
15492|        }
15493|
15494|        $rawManagerId = $details['manager_id'] ?? null;
15495|        $managerId = ($rawManagerId !== null && $rawManagerId !== '') ? (int) $rawManagerId : null;
15496|        $teamId    = isset($details['team_id']) ? (int) $details['team_id'] : $e->getUnitId();
15497|        $approach  = (string) ($details['approach'] ?? '');
15498|
15499|        $physicalNature = $e->getNature() ?? '';
15500|        $natureLabelKey = $natureSlug !== '' ? $natureSlug : 'processo';
15501|        $title = trim((string) ($details['title'] ?? ''));
15502|        if ($title === '') {
15503|            $desc = trim($e->getDescription());
15504|            $title = $desc !== '' ? (explode("\n", $desc, 2)[0] ?: 'Evento SSMA') : 'Evento SSMA';
15505|        }
15506|
15507|        $personIdRaw = $details['person_id'] ?? null;
15508|        $personId    = $personIdRaw !== null && $personIdRaw !== '' ? (int) $personIdRaw : null;
15509|
15510|        $potSev = trim((string) ($details['potential_severity'] ?? ''));
15511|
15512|        return array_merge([
15513|            'id'              => $e->getId(),
15514|            'list_row_key'    => 'e'.$e->getId(),
15515|            'is_ssma_event'   => true,
15516|            'event_uuid'      => $e->getUuid(),
15517|            'title'           => $title,
15518|            'person_id'       => $personId,
15519|            'person_type'     => (string) ($details['person_type'] ?? ''),
15520|            'type_value'      => $e->getType(),
15521|            'nature_value'    => $natureLabelKey,
15522|            'physical_nature' => $physicalNature,
15523|            'severity_value'  => $potSev !== ''
15524|                ? SsmaOccurrenceDashboardAggregator::normalizeSeveritySlug($this->executiveReportPotentialSeveritySlug($potSev))
15525|                : $this->ssmaEventConsequenceToSeveritySlug($e->getConsequence() ?? ''),
15526|            'status_value'       => $this->ssmaEventStatusToLegacyStatus($e->getStatus()),
15527|            'event_status_raw'   => $e->getStatus(),
15528|            'workflow_status'    => SsmaOccurrenceDashboardAggregator::workflowBucketFromEventStatus($e->getStatus()),
15529|            'date'            => $e->getEventDatetime()->format('Y-m-d'),
15530|            'created_at'      => $e->getCreatedAt()->format('Y-m-d'),
15531|            'manager_id'      => $managerId ?: null,
15532|            'manager_name'    => trim((string) ($details['manager_name'] ?? '')),
15533|            'team_id'         => $teamId,
15534|            'people_ids'      => $peopleIds,
15535|            'location_value'  => $e->getLocation(),
15536|            'description'     => trim((string) ($e->getDescription() ?? '')),
15537|            'activity'        => (string) ($details['activity'] ?? $e->getDescription()),
15538|            'approach_value'  => $approach,
15539|            'gmr'             => trim((string) ($details['gmr'] ?? '')),
15540|            'category'        => trim((string) ($details['category'] ?? '')),
15541|            'responsible_ids' => $responsibleIds,
15542|            'area'            => (string) ($details['area_label'] ?? '') !== ''
15543|                ? (string) $details['area_label']
15544|                : ($teamsById[$teamId]['name'] ?? ''),
15545|            'evidences'            => $this->ssmaEvidencesStorageToDisplay(
15546|                $this->ssmaSanitizeEvidenceStorageList(
15547|                    is_array($details['evidences'] ?? null) ? $details['evidences'] : []
15548|                )
15549|            ),
15550|            'history'              => [],
15551|            'strategic_nature_label' => $strategic !== '' ? EventStrategicNatureEnum::label($strategic) : '',
15552|            'agent_label'          => ($ag = trim((string) ($details['agent'] ?? ($e->getAgent() ?? '')))) !== '' ? EventAgentEnum::label($ag) : '',
15553|            'consequence_label'    => ($cq = $e->getConsequence() ?? '') !== '' ? EventConsequenceEnum::label($cq) : '',
15554|            'consequence'          => (string) ($e->getConsequence() ?? ''),
15555|            'potential_consequence'=> (string) ($details['potential_consequence'] ?? ''),
15556|            'potential_consequence_label' => ($pcq = (string) ($details['potential_consequence'] ?? '')) !== '' && EventConsequenceEnum::isValid($pcq)
15557|                ? EventConsequenceEnum::label($pcq) : '',
15558|            'impacts_display'      => implode(', ', array_filter(array_map(
15559|                static fn (string $imp) => \App\Enum\Ssma\EventImpactEnum::label($imp),
15560|                array_filter(is_array($e->getImpacts()) ? $e->getImpacts() : [], static fn ($v) => is_string($v) && $v !== '')
15561|            ))),
15562|            'event_datetime'       => $e->getEventDatetime()->format('d/m/Y H:i'),
15563|            'had_injury'           => !empty($details['had_injury']),
15564|            'body_parts'           => $this->ssmaEnrichBodyPartsForDisplay($details),
15565|            'body_location_detail' => trim((string) ($details['body_location_detail'] ?? '')),
15566|            'injury_type_label'      => ($it = (string) ($details['injury_type'] ?? '')) !== '' ? InjuryTypeEnum::label($it) : '',
15567|            'injury_severity_label'  => ($is = (string) ($details['injury_severity'] ?? '')) !== '' ? InjurySeverityEnum::label($is) : '',
15568|            'injury_classification'  => (string) ($details['injury_classification'] ?? ''),
15569|            'injury_classification_label' => $this->ssmaReportInjuryClassificationLabel(
15570|                (string) ($details['injury_classification'] ?? '')
15571|            ),
15572|            'work_leave'             => (string) ($details['work_leave'] ?? ''),
15573|            'work_leave_label'       => $this->ssmaReportWorkLeaveLabel($details['work_leave'] ?? ''),
15574|            'occurrence_approval'    => is_array($details['occurrence_approval'] ?? null) ? $details['occurrence_approval'] : [],
15575|            'injured_people_maps'    => $this->ssmaBuildInjuredPeopleMapsForView($details),
15576|            'potential_severity'     => (string) ($details['potential_severity'] ?? ''),
15577|            'deviation_type'         => (string) ($details['deviation_type'] ?? ''),
15578|            'failed_barrier'         => (string) ($details['failed_barrier'] ?? ''),
15579|            'barrier_type'           => (string) ($details['barrier_type'] ?? ''),
15580|            'descaracter_suspect'    => !empty($details['descaracter_suspect']) ? 1 : 0,
15581|            'descaracterizado'       => array_key_exists('descaracterizado', $details) ? (string) $details['descaracterizado'] : '',
15582|            'aprofundamento_pending' => $this->ssmaEventAprofundamentoPending($e) ? 1 : 0,
15583|            'aprofundamento_status' => strtolower(trim((string) ($details['aprofundamento_status'] ?? ''))),
15584|            'aprofundamento_complete' => (
15585|                strtolower(trim((string) ($details['aprofundamento_status'] ?? ''))) === 'finalized'
15586|                || !empty($details['aprofundamento_complete'])
15587|            ) ? 1 : 0,
15588|            'witness_ids'            => $this->ssmaExtractIdListFromDetails($details['witness_ids'] ?? null),
15589|            'created_by_id'          => $e->getCreatedById(),
15590|            'created_by_member_id'   => $this->resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId($e->getCompany(), $e->getCreatedById()),
15591|            'immediate_risk'         => !empty($details['immediate_risk']) ? 1 : 0,
15592|            'ros_resolved'           => !empty($details['ros_resolved']) ? 1 : 0,
15593|        ], $this->ssmaNormalizeHandFootDetailsForDisplay($details));
15594|    }
15595|
15596|    /**
15597|     * Flag do filtro “campos obrigatórios pendentes” no aprofundamento técnico.
15598|     * Usa o validador completo + checklist ROS/QA (soft no create, rígido no filtro).
15599|     */
15600|    private function ssmaEventAprofundamentoPending(\App\Entity\SsmaEvent $e): bool
15601|    {
15602|        $data = $this->eventToValidationArray($e);
15603|        $validator = new \App\Service\Ssma\SsmaEventValidator();
15604|
15605|        return $validator->aprofundamentoPendingErrors($data) !== [];
15606|    }
15607|
15608|    /**
15609|     * Lista de acidentados com mapa corporal para a view (troca por avatar).
15610|     *
Request #15 deepseek-v4-flash P:78.94K C:245 CR:74.75K CW:0 3043ms
Reasoning
For events in the detail view (event kind), the occurrence row is loaded through loadOccurrences? Actually the occurrence detail page at line ~3519 - where does `$occurrence` come from? The occurrence row is likely from the SQL query (loadOccurrences) including is_ssma_event rows, or from mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow. Let me find the occurrence view controller entry function, and see how it loads the row. Search "is_ssma_event" for the occurrence detail by id. Search for route name etc. Hmm maybe detail is within a big method. Let me search for the function around line 3350-3400 with function name. Read 3330-3405 to see function start.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 3300, "end_line": 3400}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 3300-3400
3300|                $val = $d->getValidadeDocumento();
3301|                // Documento aprovado só conta se não houver validade ou validade >= hoje
3302|                if ($val === null || \DateTimeImmutable::createFromInterface($val) >= $today) {
3303|                    $aprovados[$d->getRequisitoLabel()] = true;
3304|                }
3305|            }
3306|
3307|            $todos = count(array_intersect_key(array_flip($requisitos), $aprovados)) === count($requisitos);
3308|            $vinculo->setStatusRequisito($todos ? 'valido' : 'pendente');
3309|        }
3310|    }
3311|
3312|    public function viewOccurrence(Request $request, int $id): Response
3313|    {
3314|        if (!$this->canEnterSsmaOperationalArea()) {
3315|            throw $this->createAccessDeniedException('Sem permissão para acessar esta ocorrência.');
3316|        }
3317|
3318|        $viewData = $this->buildSsmaViewData([
3319|            'occurrence_id' => $id,
3320|            'occurrence_kind' => $request->query->get('kind'),
3321|        ]);
3322|        $occurrence = null;
3323|        $occurrenceActions = [];
3324|        $actionTypeLabels = $viewData['action_type_labels'] ?? [];
3325|
3326|        $matching = [];
3327|        foreach ($viewData['occurrences'] as $item) {
3328|            if ((int) ($item['id'] ?? 0) === $id) {
3329|                $matching[] = $item;
3330|            }
3331|        }
3332|
3333|        if ($matching === []) {
3334|            $userForStakeholder = $this->getUser();
3335|            $companyForStakeholder = $userForStakeholder instanceof User ? $userForStakeholder->getCompany() : null;
3336|            $stakeholderRow = ($companyForStakeholder instanceof Company && $userForStakeholder instanceof User)
3337|                ? $this->tryLoadOccurrenceViewRowForActionStakeholder(
3338|                    $id,
3339|                    $request->query->get('kind'),
3340|                    $companyForStakeholder,
3341|                    $userForStakeholder
3342|                )
3343|                : null;
3344|            if ($stakeholderRow !== null) {
3345|                $matching = [$stakeholderRow];
3346|            }
3347|        }
3348|
3349|        if ($matching === []) {
3350|            $approverUser = $this->getUser();
3351|            $approverCompany = $approverUser instanceof User ? $approverUser->getCompany() : null;
3352|            if (
3353|                $approverCompany instanceof Company
3354|                && $approverUser instanceof User
3355|                && $this->canApproveSsmaOccurrence($approverCompany, $approverUser)
3356|            ) {
3357|                foreach ($this->loadOccurrenceListRowsForDetailView(
3358|                    $approverCompany,
3359|                    $id,
3360|                    $viewData['allMembers'] ?? [],
3361|                    $viewData['teams'] ?? []
3362|                ) as $item) {
3363|                    if ((int) ($item['id'] ?? 0) === $id) {
3364|                        $matching[] = $item;
3365|                    }
3366|                }
3367|            }
3368|        }
3369|
3370|        if ($matching === []) {
3371|            $this->addFlash('warning', 'Ocorrência não encontrada.');
3372|
3373|            return $this->redirectToRoute('ssma_ocorrencia_index');
3374|        }
3375|
3376|        $kind = $request->query->get('kind');
3377|        if ($kind === 'event') {
3378|            foreach ($matching as $item) {
3379|                if (($item['is_ssma_event'] ?? false) === true) {
3380|                $occurrence = $item;
3381|                break;
3382|            }
3383|        }
3384|            if ($occurrence === null) {
3385|                $this->addFlash('warning', 'Registro não encontrado.');
3386|
3387|                return $this->redirectToRoute('ssma_ocorrencia_index');
3388|            }
3389|        } else {
3390|            foreach ($matching as $item) {
3391|                if (!($item['is_ssma_event'] ?? false)) {
3392|                    $occurrence = $item;
3393|                    break;
3394|                }
3395|            }
3396|            if ($occurrence === null) {
3397|                $occurrence = $matching[0];
3398|            }
3399|        }
3400|
Request #16 deepseek-v4-flash P:80.43K C:1.04K CR:79.1K CW:0 7840ms
Reasoning
The occurrence data for view comes from `buildSsmaViewData(...)` occurrence rows which are passed through `loadOccurrences` etc. These go through `enrichOccurrenceManagerFields` (lines 14916/15222/15341/22760). So the occurrence row now will have created_by_member_id resolved via enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback (called at the beginning of enrichOccurrenceManagerFields when company provided). So `occurrence.created_by_member_id` should be set in most cases. But wait: `enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback` sets created_by_member_id from created_by_id only when created_by_member_id is empty. So there could be a case where the SQL row already has created_by_member_id in the row query. Fine. But there may be places where occurrence is serialized from `SsmaEventService::serialize` for the detail view for events, not through enrichOccurrenceManagerFields. But the detail uses matching item from buildSsmaViewData occurrences list (enriched). So likely fine. Edge: allMembers passed to template. `member_by_id` keys 'member_<id>', id = company member id. But is allMembers guaranteed to contain the creator? If the creator member is not part of allMembers? allMembers presumably = all company members; loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite. So yes. However there is still an issue for the list display in the details: member with id = created_by_member_id but user removed? The map still includes removed members? Not sure. If the creator left the company, created_by_member_id still valid; allMembers (with isRemoved filter?) may exclude them; then display shows "—" instead of fallback manager name. In prior version, `manager_display_name` fallback was displayed. In new template "Responsável pelo cadastro" shows "—" when created_by_member not found and reported_by_member null (manager_member not found either since manager may not be in map) → but occurrence.manager_display_name was available in the manager section; for the "responsável pelo cadastro" they dropped the manager_display_name fallback. So it will show "—". That's a display edge, low severity. Not really a correctness bug. Now the more significant issues: A. Now in occurrence_view: previously for ROS the block displayed "Relatado por"; now the top block label "Responsável pelo cadastro". Both sections shown for all types. For ROS they removed the "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" from the card? Wait diff: In the section, the "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" block was nested inside `{% if is_ros_occurrence %}` and `{% else %}` branches. Wait originally there were two large branches: ROS shows "Relatado por" and then "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)"; non-ROS shows "Gestor responsável" then "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)"? Let me re-read the diff carefully. Original: ``` {% if is_ros_occurrence %} <div class="mb-3">Relatado por ...</div> {% else %} <div class="mb-3">Gestor responsável ...</div> {% endif %} {% if not is_ros_occurrence %} ?? ``` Wait no. Let me re-read the diff: The removed lines: ``` - {% if is_ros_occurrence %} - <div class="mb-3"> Relatado por... - {% else %} - <div class="mb-3"> Gestor responsável ... - {% endif %} ``` Then added: ``` + <div class="mb-3"> Responsável pelo cadastro (always) </div> + <div class="mb-3"> Gestor responsável (always) </div> + + {% if not is_ros_occurrence %} <div class="mb-3"> <p class="text-muted mb-1 font-weight-bold">Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)</p> ... ``` Hmm wait, but originally where was "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" block located? Since diff shows `{% if not is_ros_occurrence %}` is added before an unchanged block. Let me view current template around 924-1000 to understand the structure. Let me read current file lines 900-1010.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig", "start_line": 895, "end_line": 1000}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig (Total lines: 3231)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 895-1000
895|                <div class="mb-3">
896|                    <p class="text-muted mb-1 font-weight-bold">Contexto do evento</p>
897|                    <p class="mb-0 font-weight-bold">Registrado {{ occurrence.date|date('d/m/Y') }}</p>
898|                </div>
899|
900|                <div class="mb-3">
901|                    <p class="text-muted mb-1 font-weight-bold">Local da ocorrência</p>
902|                    <p class="mb-0 font-weight-bold">{{ location_label }}</p>
903|                </div>
904|
905|                {% set area_resp_key = occurrence.area_responsible_id|default(null) ? ('member_' ~ occurrence.area_responsible_id) : '' %}
906|                {% set area_resp_member = area_resp_key and member_by_id[area_resp_key] is defined ? member_by_id[area_resp_key] : null %}
907|                <div class="mb-3">
908|                    <p class="text-muted mb-1 font-weight-bold">Responsável da área</p>
909|                    {% if area_resp_member %}
910|                        {% include 'components/ui/_member_avatars_stack.html.twig' with {
911|                            members: [area_resp_member|merge({'avatar': null, 'email': null})],
912|                            max_visible: 1,
913|                            size: 28
914|                        } %}
915|                    {% elseif occurrence.area_responsible_name|default('') %}
916|                        <p class="mb-0 font-weight-bold">{{ occurrence.area_responsible_name }}</p>
917|                    {% else %}
918|                        <p class="mb-0 font-weight-bold">—</p>
919|                    {% endif %}
920|                </div>
921|
922|                <div class="mb-3">
923|                    <p class="text-muted mb-1 font-weight-bold">Equipe</p>
924|                    <p class="mb-0 font-weight-bold">{{ team_name }}</p>
925|                </div>
926|
927|                <div class="mb-3">
928|                    <p class="text-muted mb-1 font-weight-bold">Responsável pelo cadastro</p>
929|                    {% if created_by_member %}
930|                        {% include 'components/ui/_member_avatars_stack.html.twig' with {
931|                            members: [created_by_member|merge({'avatar': null, 'email': null})],
932|                            max_visible: 1,
933|                            size: 28
934|                        } %}
935|                    {% elseif reported_by_member %}
936|                        {% include 'components/ui/_member_avatars_stack.html.twig' with {
937|                            members: [reported_by_member|merge({'avatar': null, 'email': null})],
938|                            max_visible: 1,
939|                            size: 28
940|                        } %}
941|                    {% else %}
942|                        <p class="mb-0 font-weight-bold">—</p>
943|                    {% endif %}
944|                </div>
945|
946|                <div class="mb-3">
947|                    <p class="text-muted mb-1 font-weight-bold">Gestor responsável</p>
948|                    {% if manager_member %}
949|                        {% include 'components/ui/_member_avatars_stack.html.twig' with {
950|                            members: [manager_member|merge({'avatar': null, 'email': null})],
951|                            max_visible: 1,
952|                            size: 28
953|                        } %}
954|                    {% elseif occurrence.manager_display_name|default('') %}
955|                        <p class="mb-0 font-weight-bold">{{ occurrence.manager_display_name }}</p>
956|                    {% else %}
957|                        <p class="mb-0 font-weight-bold">—</p>
958|                    {% endif %}
959|                </div>
960|
961|                {% if not is_ros_occurrence %}
962|                    <div class="mb-3">
963|                        <p class="text-muted mb-1 font-weight-bold">Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)</p>
964|                        {% include 'ssma/occurrence/partials/_involved_people_display.html.twig' with {
965|                            people_ids: occurrence.people_ids|default([]),
966|                            people_members: people_members,
967|                            member_by_id: member_by_id,
968|                            teams: teams|default([]),
969|                            can_view_names: ssmaCanViewAccidentVictimName|default(false),
970|                            max_visible: 4,
971|                            size: 28
972|                        } %}
973|                    </div>
974|                {% endif %}
975|
976|                {% if witness_members|length > 0 %}
977|                    <div class="mb-3">
978|                        <p class="text-muted mb-1 font-weight-bold">Testemunhas</p>
979|                        {% include 'components/ui/_member_avatars_stack.html.twig' with {
980|                            members: witness_members,
981|                            max_visible: 4,
982|                            size: 28
983|                        } %}
984|                    </div>
985|                {% endif %}
986|
987|                {% if occurrence.is_ssma_event|default(false)
988|                    and occurrence.type_value|default('') == 'ACIDENTE_PESSOAL'
989|                    and (
990|                        (occurrence.injured_people_maps|default([])|length > 0)
991|                        or (occurrence.had_injury|default(false) and occurrence.body_parts|default([])|length > 0)
992|                    ) %}
993|                    <hr class="my-3">
994|                    {% set _injuredMaps = occurrence.injured_people_maps|default([]) %}
995|                    {% if _injuredMaps|length == 0 and occurrence.body_parts|default([])|length > 0 %}
996|                        {% set _injuredMaps = [{
997|                            'person_id': '',
998|                            'body_parts': occurrence.body_parts,
999|                            'body_location_detail': occurrence.body_location_detail|default(''),
1000|                            'injury_type_label': occurrence.injury_type_label|default(''),
Request #17 deepseek-v4-flash P:82.93K C:4.45K CR:81.41K CW:0 33594ms
Reasoning
Important observation! In the new template, for **ROS** occurrences, "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" is now **hidden** (`{% if not is_ros_occurrence %}`). Previously (in the diff removed lines?), was there a "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" block inside the ROS branch as well? Let me look at the diff again: The diff shows that the `{% if not is_ros_occurrence %}` block wrapping the "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" was added as `+` lines. The block itself `Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)` was previously inside the if/else structure? Let's reconstruct: Before the change, there was something like: ``` {% if is_ros_occurrence %} <div class="mb-3"> Relatado por ... {% else %} <div class="mb-3"> Gestor responsável ... {% endif %} {% if not is_ros_occurrence %} <-- this is likely new added <div class="mb-3"> Pessoa(s) envolvida(s) ... ``` Wait the diff hunk header indicates: ``` @@ -924,37 +924,41 @@ ``` So 37 removed/changed lines around this block. The removed lines include: ``` - {% if is_ros_occurrence %} - <div class="mb-3"> - <p ...>Relatado por</p> - ... avatars ... - </div> - {% else %} - <div class="mb-3"> - <p ...>Gestor responsável</p> - ... avatars ... - </div> - {% endif %} ``` Then added: ``` + <div class="mb-3">Responsável pelo cadastro</div> + <div class="mb-3">Gestor responsável</div> + + {% if not is_ros_occurrence %} <div class="mb-3"> <p class="text-muted mb-1 font-weight-bold">Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)</p> ``` Wait but how was "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" structured before? In the diff, the unchanged line `{% if not is_ros_occurrence %}` preceded by nothing? Hmm. Actually, in the original code there may have been TWO separate sections: one for ROS at top showing Relatado por then Pessoa(s) envolvida(s) below (not ROS wrapping); Wait—the hunk -924,37 +924,41. The context lines above line 924 in the original file would include lines 522-536 modifications too. Actually the important part: The 'Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)' block context: it is currently at lines 961-974. Before this PR, was it rendered for both ROS and non-ROS, or only for non-ROS? The label "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" for a ROS concerns involved people. Before, for ROS, the "Relatado por" was shown; and maybe involved people also shown for ROS. Now they wrap with `{% if not is_ros_occurrence %}`, meaning ROS no longer shows "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" section. Wait but the diff `+{% if not is_ros_occurrence %}` is added at the place before an unchanged block. So indeed previously the block always rendered regardless of type? Let's confirm by reading git history? We can't. But from the diff: ``` - {% if is_ros_occurrence %} ... - {% else %} ... - {% endif %} + <div class="mb-3">Responsável pelo cadastro</div> + <div class="mb-3">Gestor responsável</div> + + {% if not is_ros_occurrence %} <div class="mb-3"> <p class="text-muted mb-1 font-weight-bold">Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)</p> ``` So before there was only the single if/else that switched between "Relatado por"/"Gestor responsável"; and below, the "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" block was always shown (not wrapped). Now they wrap with not ROS. Wait, was "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" shown for ROS before? For ROS, the primary "involved person" would be displayed separately? Actually for ROS, people involved is relevant; witness section separate. But the wrapping adds `not is_ros_occurrence` to hide it for ROS. It could be intentional; hmm. Maybe for ROS, people involved = victim which is displayed via `person_id` in other part of the template? Actually ROS = report of unsafe situation with a person? We shouldn't overanalyze; the diff is uncertain as to whether block was shown for ROS before. Let me consider the original template content to see what was around before the change - We can't view the old version. But we can infer: The removed `{% if is_ros_occurrence %}` branch included "Relatado por", else "Gestor responsável". And the new change unconditionally shows both sections, but only keeps involved people hidden when ROS. Previously involved people section appears always (since unchanged). But now they add not-ROS guard. Was this to match requirement? We don't have proof of regression; could be deliberate. Might skip. Actually, wait - let me examine more carefully: For ROS, is `person_id`/people_ids even set? For an event, in details, ROS has people_ids of the person(s) involved. Might be the "acidentado" is different. Actually "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" may only matter for ROS, not for non-ROS? Hmm no. But from the old code's appearance, "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" was inside the same hunk and unchanged lines begin after `{% endif %}`? Let's confirm with the actual original diff context lines that are unchanged in the old file. From diff hunk, the lines `{% if is_ros_occurrence %}` ... were removed then the added replacement; the `Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)` div is the unchanged context lines (space-prefixed) but the `{% if not is_ros_occurrence %}` wrapper is newly added. So it means previously the "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" block was shown for ROS too. So this diff changes behavior: ROS occurrences no longer display "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)". Hmm, but could be intentional because for ROS, the reporter = involved = person (maybe they display the victim separately under the accident type section). Actually for "ROS" maybe person involved is itself the reporter/notification subject, and they show "Responsável pelo cadastro"? This is unclear. Actually the original comment says: `{# ROS: "Relatado por" — pessoa física que registrou (criador) ou gestor que selecionou a si mesmo/outro. #}` For ROS, "Relatado por" = the person who reports. For non-ROS, "Gestor responsável". So for ROS the old code showed Relatado por and then people involved? The hunk then has a `{% if is_ros_occurrence %}` removal then else. Then addition changes both to be always present and they hid involved people for ROS? Perhaps "pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" are exactly relevant to ROS (the person exposed to risk). Hmm hiding them on ROS seems wrong. But maybe they moved people involved elsewhere for ROS (the injured person section for accidents? No, ROS people involved display likely above). This needs more careful review. But I worry about over-reporting. Let me look for other places where people_ids are displayed for ROS events in this template. Search for "_involved_people_display" usage only once. So if hidden for ROS now, ROS will not show involved persons. For a ROS "quase acidente" you'd usually list the involved person. Actually many events are non-ROS; maybe the field only matters for ROS? Wait no: for non-ROS they show "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" (e.g., accident injured person). ROS people involved could be relevant. I cannot verify intent. But since this change removes a previously displayed section for ROS without clear product note in the docs, this may be an accidental regression. Hmm. Actually let's reconsider: In the previous code, maybe the "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" section was inside the else branch (non-ROS) because the ROS branch contained its own involved person display already. Diff removed the whole if/else branch. If the section was inside the else branch, then before: ROS → Relatado por only (no people involved?). Let's check old template line numbers. The removed hunks earlier in the diff from lines 522-536 modify the "Relatado por" computation but not the display area. Actually the hunk at 924 replaces lines 924-960ish. Let me think again: removed 37 lines at old lines ~924-960, added 41 lines new ~924-964. The unchanged following line after addition is `<div class="mb-3"> Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)` block. Wait, in diff the added `{% if not is_ros_occurrence %}` is followed by the context line `<div class="mb-3">` etc. It says: ``` + {% if not is_ros_occurrence %} <div class="mb-3"> <p class="text-muted mb-1 font-weight-bold">Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)</p> ``` This implies the "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" block existed unchanged in old code; and its previous surrounding context (above) would have been... the end of the if/else (Relatado/Gestor) block. So before change: after the Relatado/Gestor block, the Pessoa(s) envolvida(s) always displayed for both ROS and non-ROS? But wait if it's inside removed `else` branch before, the entire "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" block would have been removed, but it's kept as context (unchanged). Since the context remains, and prior 37 lines removed do NOT include the Pessoa section (it's context in the new + old), the only added line regarding it is the `not is_ros_occurrence` guard. So pre-PR the "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" section was outside the ROS if/else? Actually wait: The prior if/else concluded before the "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" block started in the old file? The old if/else at the point before "Pessoa(s)..." would be closed at the end of Gestor responsável branch, then the "Pessoa..." block follows for all types. Hmm. So in the old code, the whole sequence was something like: - [if is_ros_occurrence] Relatado por... [else] Gestor responsável... [endif] - Pessoa(s) envolvida(s) ... (for all types) New code: - Responsável pelo cadastro (all types) - Gestor responsável (all types) - if not is_ros_occurrence → Pessoa(s) envolvida(s) So indeed, ROS occurrences previously had "Relatado por" + "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)"; now have "Responsável pelo cadastro" + "Gestor responsável" but NO "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)". If the people involved (the person at risk) are essential info for ROS, this hides them on the view. But maybe for ROS, the "people involved" includes the reporter himself which is now the "Responsável pelo cadastro"? Actually no; the reporter is a co-worker. Hmm. Actually ROS = "Relato de situação" or "Relato de Segurança"? Given the original comment "ROS — 'Relatado por' — pessoa física que registrou (criador) ou gestor que selecionou a si mesmo/outro." so ROS probably = Relato de... something personal safety/almost-accident observed by a person who witnessed; people involved could be themselves? Wait the ROS "pessoa física comum registra própria ocorrência" - could be about themselves (e.g., unsafe condition experienced) — maybe an employee reporting unsafe condition affecting themself. In that case the involved person == reporter. Hmm, then hiding "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" might be because the reporter is displayed as "Responsável pelo cadastro"? Not exactly the same. Given the uncertainty, I'll not flag the ROS hiding of people involved as a bug, unless confident. Actually the rule stated in the user-specific instruction (issue 1 in review plan): the reviewer posits that people-involved restriction removal is a bug, but the meeting doc explicitly says involved people picker should always be whole company; and validation removed is intended. So no. But we should consider the removal of server-side people validation: the old code validated people belong to allowed members (team scope). That means previously involved people had to be in the reporter's teams, while meeting says "anyone can be placed" - so removal is correct. Now let me consider the important thing: the validation function `validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope` is called after `applySsmaEventManagerAssignment`, which sets manager to ownLeader when member not canSelect; or when canSelect, sets requested. But this means a normal plain member (scope null) who registers an ROS/Event: validation not called because scope null. OK. But there's an actual subtle issue: In updateEvent, the function `validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope` is called on every update (including aprofundamento-only updates by specialists). In aprofundamento-only updates: an event created by member X in team scope of specialist? Wait aprofundamento specialist has scope possibly []. If scope === [] they return message unless tech links. Actually scope [] path: if they are technical specialist (tech links), return null (skip validation). Hmm wait, they check `$scope === []` then fetch member's SsmaPermissionTagMember, if not empty return null. That permits. If specialist has no team scope but also no permission tag member, they would fail at team check? But then manager validation requires managerId >0 and leader + team etc... Actually if scope===[] and member has no tech links, returns 'Seu perfil não está vinculado...'. Wait that return message: 'Seu perfil não está vinculado a nenhuma equipe; não é possível registrar ocorrências.' For an aprofundamento update this message is weird but existed before. Focus: Now, after the change, in the update path for a canFullEdit supervisor with team scope editing an existing ROS event: manager preserved from existing details (if any). If manager was an old-style manager not an immediate leader of someone → validation error even though manager unchanged. But this only matters if the manager_id < old data not leader. Possibly. But the change also allows that if manager is own leader, etc. Honestly, given the magnitude of this controller and the review expectations, let me focus on high-confidence, verifiable problems in this diff: 1. **Removal of people-involved scope validation**: docs explicitly confirm intentional. Skip. 2. **`isSsmaEventVisibleUnderOccurrenceTeamDashboardScope` returns true for creator (line 10548-10552)**: Now events created by the user are visible even if the event is outside team scope. Wait there's a subtlety: This function is used for both listing and per-ID read authorization. For the detail GET /events/{id} route and editEvent, it's now always visible to its creator, so an employee may open/edit own event even if the event was created in a different team scope. For editing? This function also used in updateEvent visibility check (line 26617) and getEvent (line 26589). Creator could thus edit their own event even if not in the scope they registered under (their team scope). But is it OK? Could be the intended behavior to let creator edit? Probably needed for the fix 4b. It is plausible intended. But security-wise: When the member was in team A (when creating) and later moves to team B, they can still view/edit their own old event in team A. Probably fine. 3. **Cache properties are instance-level**: `ssmaImmediateLeaderMemberIdsCache` is keyed by company but single value — If within a single request the code calls `collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company)` for two different companies (multi-company data fetch?), returns the first company's leader ids for the second company! Given the SsmaController handles one company context per request (company from user) but there are functions loading data for multiple network companies (e.g., in dashboard across companies?) e.g., buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions is always with $company param but in the network scenario, maybe not called per subsidiary. But mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow→enrichOccurrenceManagerFields→enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback is only for current company. The dashboard filter uses a single company. However, could `buildSsmaViewData` be called for multiple companies (network view)? Possibly not. Still, the cache not being keyed by company is a latent risk but might be fine given request-scoped usage with single company. Also the cache is stored as instance property on the controller, which is a singleton service (per request). Usually controller created per request. OK. 4. **N+1 queries (issue #5)**: enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback for rows lacking manager_id does entityManager->find for each (cache? find uses identity map so repeated same member cheap). resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId does a query per new user (cached per request in array). For a dashboard listing of, say, 500 occurrences with many distinct creators → up to 500 queries. This can add load, but given cap 500 in listing it's bounded. And it's per event with no created_by_member_id, that calls resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId which queries repo each time new user; identity map doesn't apply because findBy query; each distinct user id triggers a query. Cache map persists for whole request, so repeated same user reused. In worst case of 500 events with distinct users → 500 queries. But these are the "loadOccurrences" listing which probably runs frequently. Hmm. Actually look: `mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow` line 15590 adds resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId per event already at mapping time, so for events created via list map, it's an extra query per distinct user. This is executed each time `loadOccurrences`/`mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow` called. Previously it wasn't. This could add N+1 but with per-request cache it's per distinct user. If the same user created many events, only one query. Acceptable? Perhaps report performance low. The review plan suggests medium. It's at meaningful scale (500 rows) and might add ~500 queries worst case per dashboard render. Real enough. But is it per-request recreated controller? Probably new controller each request, so caching only helps within request. We'll flag as low/medium perf. Actually wait, the resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId query is a findBy on the CompanyMembers repository with filters; each distinct user per request. For dashboard with 500 occurrences each different creator → 500 queries. On an index page that already runs dozens of queries this is heavy. Might flag as low performance. We could mention using a single query with `IN`. But let's verify whether mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow is on the "hot path" for dashboard listing. Actually line 14916/15222/15341 all in functions that fetch occurrences; mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow used by appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser (small number), and possibly also for events in the dashboard? Let me check where mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow is called from. Search.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow("}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 6
12424|            $row = $this->mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow($event, $teamsById);
14912|            $result[] = $this->mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow($event, $teamsById);
15214|                $result[] = $this->mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow($event, $teamsById);
15322|                $evtById[(int) $event->getId()] = $this->mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow($event, $teamsById);
15470|    private function mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow(SsmaEvent $e, array $teamsById): array
16701|            $row = $this->mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow($event, $teamsById);

file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 14880, "end_line": 14940}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 14880-14940
14880|        }
14881|
14882|        return $occurrences;
14883|    }
14884|
14885|    /**
14886|     * Linhas de listagem para a tela de detalhe — uma ocorrência legada e/ou evento SSMA pelo ID.
14887|     *
14888|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $allMembers
14889|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $teams
14890|     *
14891|     * @return list<array<string, mixed>>
14892|     */
14893|    private function loadOccurrenceListRowsForDetailView(
14894|        Company $company,
14895|        int $id,
14896|        array $allMembers,
14897|        array $teams
14898|    ): array {
14899|        $teamsById = array_column($teams, null, 'id');
14900|        $membersById = array_column($allMembers, null, 'id');
14901|        $result = [];
14902|
14903|        $legacy = $this->entityManager->getRepository(SsmaOccurrence::class)
14904|            ->findOneBy(['id' => $id, 'company' => $company]);
14905|        if ($legacy instanceof SsmaOccurrence) {
14906|            $result[] = $this->mapSsmaOccurrenceEntityToListRow($legacy, $teamsById);
14907|        }
14908|
14909|        $event = $this->entityManager->getRepository(SsmaEvent::class)
14910|            ->findOneBy(['id' => $id, 'company' => $company]);
14911|        if ($event instanceof SsmaEvent) {
14912|            $result[] = $this->mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow($event, $teamsById);
14913|        }
14914|
14915|        foreach ($result as $idx => $row) {
14916|            $result[$idx] = $this->enrichOccurrenceManagerFields($row, $membersById, $company);
14917|        }
14918|
14919|        if ($result === []) {
14920|            return [];
14921|        }
14922|
14923|        $companyId = (int) $company->getId();
14924|        foreach ($result as $idx => $occRow) {
14925|            $entityId = (int) ($occRow['id'] ?? 0);
14926|            $isEvent = !empty($occRow['is_ssma_event']);
14927|            $treeMeta = $this->ssmaCauseTreeService->resolveEntityTreeMeta($companyId, $entityId, $isEvent);
14928|            $occRow['cause_tree_id'] = $treeMeta['cause_tree_id'];
14929|            $result[$idx] = $this->applyOccurrenceCommitteeTriggerFlags($occRow, $company, $treeMeta['tree_status']);
14930|        }
14931|
14932|        return $this->enrichOccurrencesGravityLabels($result);
14933|    }
14934|
14935|    /**
14936|     * Mantém no SSR do detalhe apenas membros citados na ocorrência/ações + gestores do modal.
14937|     *
14938|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $allMembers
14939|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $occurrences
14940|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $actionsTaken
Request #18 deepseek-v4-flash P:88.43K C:146 CR:87.3K CW:0 2366ms
Reasoning
Let me examine where mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow is called in loadOccurrences (the big list). Line 15214, 15322 - within functions that probably load all events for a dashboard view. Let me read around 15160-15360.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 15120, "end_line": 15360}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 15120-15360
15120|    {
15121|        $projectIds = array_values(array_unique(array_filter(array_map(
15122|            static fn (SsmaAction $row): ?int => $row->getProjectId(),
15123|            $rows
15124|        ))));
15125|        $taskCountersByProject = $this->buildProjectTaskCounters($projectIds);
15126|        $projectNamesById = [];
15127|        if ($projectIds !== []) {
15128|            $projectEntities = $this->entityManager->getRepository(Project::class)->findBy(['id' => $projectIds]);
15129|            foreach ($projectEntities as $projectEntity) {
15130|                $projectNamesById[(int) $projectEntity->getId()] = (string) ($projectEntity->getName() ?? '');
15131|            }
15132|        }
15133|
15134|        $result = [];
15135|        foreach ($rows as $row) {
15136|            $responsibleIds = $row->getResponsibleIds() ?? [];
15137|
15138|            $projectId = $row->getProjectId();
15139|            $linkedProject = $row->isHasProject() && $projectId;
15140|            $projectUrl = $linkedProject ? '/projects/project_steps/' . $projectId : null;
15141|            $taskCounters = $linkedProject ? ($taskCountersByProject[$projectId] ?? ['total' => 0, 'completed' => 0]) : ['total' => 0, 'completed' => 0];
15142|
15143|            $relatedEventType = $row->resolveRelatedEventType();
15144|
15145|            $result[] = array_merge([
15146|                'id'                      => $row->getId(),
15147|                'occurrence_id'           => $row->getOccurrence()?->getId(),
15148|                'event_id'                => $row->getEvent()?->getId(),
15149|                'related_event_type'      => $relatedEventType,
15150|                'title'                   => $row->getTitle(),
15151|                'description'             => $row->getDescription() ?? '',
15152|                'type'                    => $row->getType() ?? '',
15153|                'responsible_ids'         => $responsibleIds,
15154|                'deadline'                => $row->getDeadline()?->format('Y-m-d'),
15155|                'solved'                  => $row->isSolved(),
15156|                'has_project'             => $row->isHasProject(),
15157|                'project_id'              => $projectId,
15158|                'project_url'             => $projectUrl,
15159|                'project_name'            => $linkedProject ? ($projectNamesById[(int) $projectId] ?? ('Projeto #' . $projectId)) : '',
15160|                'project_start_date'      => $row->getProjectStartDate()?->format('Y-m-d') ?? '',
15161|                'project_priority'        => $row->getProjectPriority() ?? '',
15162|                'control_hierarchy'       => $row->getControlHierarchy() ?? '',
15163|                'created_at'              => $row->getCreatedAt()->format('Y-m-d'),
15164|                'updated_at'              => $row->getUpdatedAt()->format('Y-m-d'),
15165|                'actions_taken_completed' => $taskCounters['completed'],
15166|                'actions_taken_total'     => $taskCounters['total'],
15167|                'validation_status'       => $row->getValidationStatus() ?? '',
15168|                'validator_member_id'     => $row->getValidatorMemberId(),
15169|                'closing_evidence'        => $row->getClosingEvidence() ?? '',
15170|                'resolution_rating'       => $row->getResolutionRating() ?? '',
15171|                'resolution_note'         => $this->extractLastSsmaActionResolutionNote($row->getDescription()),
15172|                'cc_demand_id'            => $row->getCcDemandId(),
15173|                'rejection_note'          => $row->getRejectionNote() ?? '',
15174|            ], $this->resolveActionDeadlineEditMeta($row, $company, $user));
15175|        }
15176|
15177|        return $result;
15178|    }
15179|
15180|    /**
15181|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $allMembers
15182|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $teams
15183|     *
15184|     * @return list<array<string, mixed>>
15185|     */
15186|    private function loadOccurrences(
15187|        Company $company,
15188|        array $allMembers,
15189|        array $teams,
15190|        ?int $limit = null,
15191|        int $offset = 0,
15192|        array $types = [],
15193|        array $teamIdsFilter = [],
15194|        array $memberIdsFilter = []
15195|    ): array {
15196|        $membersById = array_column($allMembers, null, 'id');
15197|        $teamsById   = array_column($teams, null, 'id');
15198|
15199|        // Carga completa (filtros de equipe/membro depois): mantém findBy por company.
15200|        if ($limit === null) {
15201|            /** @var SsmaOccurrence[] $rows */
15202|            $rows = $this->entityManager->getRepository(SsmaOccurrence::class)
15203|                ->findBy(['company' => $company], ['createdAt' => 'DESC']);
15204|
15205|            $result = [];
15206|            foreach ($rows as $row) {
15207|                $result[] = $this->mapSsmaOccurrenceEntityToListRow($row, $teamsById);
15208|            }
15209|
15210|            /** @var SsmaEvent[] $events */
15211|            $events = $this->entityManager->getRepository(SsmaEvent::class)
15212|                ->findBy(['company' => $company], ['eventDatetime' => 'DESC']);
15213|            foreach ($events as $event) {
15214|                $result[] = $this->mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow($event, $teamsById);
15215|            }
15216|
15217|            usort($result, static function (array $a, array $b): int {
15218|                return strcmp($b['date'] ?? '', $a['date'] ?? '');
15219|            });
15220|
15221|            foreach ($result as $idx => $row) {
15222|                $result[$idx] = $this->enrichOccurrenceManagerFields($row, $membersById, $company);
15223|            }
15224|
15225|            return $result;
15226|        }
15227|
15228|        // Página (visão completa sem pós-filtro): UNION + hydrate só dos IDs da página.
15229|        $companyId = (int) $company->getId();
15230|        $conn = $this->entityManager->getConnection();
15231|        $safeLimit = max(0, (int) $limit);
15232|        $safeOffset = max(0, (int) $offset);
15233|
15234|        // Filtro opcional por tipo de ocorrência (técnico especialista).
15235|        $typeClause = '';
15236|        $typeParams = [];
15237|        if ($types !== []) {
15238|            $placeholders = implode(',', array_fill(0, count($types), '?'));
15239|            $typeClause   = ' AND type IN (' . $placeholders . ')';
15240|            $typeParams   = array_values($types);
15241|        }
15242|
15243|        // Filtro SQL de equipe/membro (supervisor com escopo de equipe).
15244|        // ssma_occurrences: team_id e manager_id; ssma_events: unit_id (coluna direta do time).
15245|        $teamClauseOcc = '';
15246|        $teamClauseEvt = '';
15247|        $teamParamsOcc = [];
15248|        $teamParamsEvt = [];
15249|        if ($teamIdsFilter !== [] || $memberIdsFilter !== []) {
15250|            $occClauses = [];
15251|            $evtClauses = [];
15252|            if ($teamIdsFilter !== []) {
15253|                $phTeam        = implode(',', array_fill(0, count($teamIdsFilter), '?'));
15254|                $occClauses[]  = 'team_id IN (' . $phTeam . ')';
15255|                $evtClauses[]  = 'unit_id IN (' . $phTeam . ')';
15256|                foreach ($teamIdsFilter as $tid) {
15257|                    $teamParamsOcc[] = (int) $tid;
15258|                    $teamParamsEvt[] = (int) $tid;
15259|                }
15260|            }
15261|            if ($memberIdsFilter !== []) {
15262|                $phMem        = implode(',', array_fill(0, count($memberIdsFilter), '?'));
15263|                $occClauses[] = 'manager_id IN (' . $phMem . ')';
15264|                foreach ($memberIdsFilter as $mid) {
15265|                    $teamParamsOcc[] = (int) $mid;
15266|                }
15267|            }
15268|            if ($occClauses !== []) {
15269|                $teamClauseOcc = ' AND (' . implode(' OR ', $occClauses) . ')';
15270|            }
15271|            if ($evtClauses !== []) {
15272|                $teamClauseEvt = ' AND (' . implode(' OR ', $evtClauses) . ')';
15273|            }
15274|        }
15275|
15276|        $keys = $conn->fetchAllAssociative(
15277|            'SELECT id, kind, sort_date FROM (
15278|                    SELECT id, \'o\' AS kind, created_at AS sort_date
15279|                      FROM ssma_occurrences
15280|                     WHERE company_id = ?' . $typeClause . $teamClauseOcc . '
15281|                    UNION ALL
15282|                    SELECT id, \'e\' AS kind, event_datetime AS sort_date
15283|                      FROM ssma_events
15284|                     WHERE company_id = ?' . $typeClause . $teamClauseEvt . '
15285|                ) u
15286|                ORDER BY sort_date DESC
15287|                LIMIT ' . $safeLimit . ' OFFSET ' . $safeOffset,
15288|            array_merge([$companyId], $typeParams, $teamParamsOcc, [$companyId], $typeParams, $teamParamsEvt)
15289|        );
15290|        if ($keys === []) {
15291|            return [];
15292|        }
15293|
15294|        $occIds = [];
15295|        $evtIds = [];
15296|        foreach ($keys as $key) {
15297|            $id = (int) ($key['id'] ?? 0);
15298|            if ($id <= 0) {
15299|                continue;
15300|            }
15301|            if (($key['kind'] ?? '') === 'e') {
15302|                $evtIds[] = $id;
15303|            } else {
15304|                $occIds[] = $id;
15305|            }
15306|        }
15307|
15308|        $occById = [];
15309|        if ($occIds !== []) {
15310|            /** @var SsmaOccurrence[] $occRows */
15311|            $occRows = $this->entityManager->getRepository(SsmaOccurrence::class)->findBy(['id' => $occIds]);
15312|            foreach ($occRows as $row) {
15313|                $occById[(int) $row->getId()] = $this->mapSsmaOccurrenceEntityToListRow($row, $teamsById);
15314|            }
15315|        }
15316|
15317|        $evtById = [];
15318|        if ($evtIds !== []) {
15319|            /** @var SsmaEvent[] $evtRows */
15320|            $evtRows = $this->entityManager->getRepository(SsmaEvent::class)->findBy(['id' => $evtIds]);
15321|            foreach ($evtRows as $event) {
15322|                $evtById[(int) $event->getId()] = $this->mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow($event, $teamsById);
15323|            }
15324|        }
15325|
15326|        $result = [];
15327|        foreach ($keys as $key) {
15328|            $id = (int) ($key['id'] ?? 0);
15329|            if (($key['kind'] ?? '') === 'e') {
15330|                if (isset($evtById[$id])) {
15331|                    $result[] = $evtById[$id];
15332|                }
15333|                continue;
15334|            }
15335|            if (isset($occById[$id])) {
15336|                $result[] = $occById[$id];
15337|            }
15338|        }
15339|
15340|        foreach ($result as $idx => $row) {
15341|            $result[$idx] = $this->enrichOccurrenceManagerFields($row, $membersById, $company);
15342|        }
15343|
15344|        return $result;
15345|    }
15346|
15347|    private function countCompanyOccurrencesAndEvents(Company $company): int
15348|    {
15349|        $companyId = (int) $company->getId();
15350|        $conn = $this->entityManager->getConnection();
15351|        $occ = (int) $conn->fetchOne(
15352|            'SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ssma_occurrences WHERE company_id = ?',
15353|            [$companyId]
15354|        );
15355|        $evt = (int) $conn->fetchOne(
15356|            'SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ssma_events WHERE company_id = ?',
15357|            [$companyId]
15358|        );
15359|
15360|        return $occ + $evt;
Request #19 deepseek-v4-flash P:91.97K C:2.7K CR:88.58K CW:0 22801ms
Reasoning
So loadOccurrences full load iterates every event (up to thousands) and calls mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow which now calls resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId per event with cache per distinct user. This adds queries per distinct user in company. For a company with, say, 2000 distinct users who created events, that's 2000 extra queries per page load. That could be meaningful performance regression. Also, each enrichOccurrenceManagerFields calls enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback, which does entityManager->find(CompanyMembers) for rows with manager_id <= 0 (legacy events with no manager). For each such row find by primary id is identity-mapped cheap after first. Actually, wait: In full-load (limit null) it loads all occurrences and all events without limit. But there's also "cap 500" elsewhere. Also appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser → mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow per event the user created; small. But, hmm, the performance of resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId: it does repository findBy each distinct (company,user). It's called from mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow in the load loop — and also from enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback if created_by_member_id missing. Wait mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow already sets created_by_member_id by calling resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId. Then enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback runs again but the value already set (>0), so won't re-query. So the main N+1 is in mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow per event for resolution of the event creator user→member. But for events of type event created by a user that IS in current company, that's basically one query per distinct event-creator user. If same creator has multiple events, cache hit. For typical companies the number of distinct creators is at most the number of company members (~ hundreds). Not terrible but could still be 500+ queries. Worth flagging? On an already-heavy page (the dashboard loads all company occurrences/events with full materialization!). Wait, is loadOccurrences called without a limit in the main dashboard? Earlier note in docs about "cap 500 before filtering". This suggests there is a cap. Let's see the "cap 500" path in buildSsmaViewData. Anyway, I'd rate as low/medium perf note. But maybe within this project where the controller is huge, there could already be heavy query patterns. I'll include it as low-severity performance suggestion with a batching suggestion. Now let me re-verify the biggest candidate issues that could be actual bugs from changes: ### Bug candidate A — collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds cache not keyed by company The cache property is `?array $ssmaImmediateLeaderMemberIdsCache = null`. In a request that processes two companies (e.g., network subsidiaries in occurrence list, or the multi-company feature where buildSsmaViewData is invoked per company?), the second call would return stale data from the first company. Need to determine whether functions like appendSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions etc. could be called with different company objects in same request. In a typical request only one company from user. However `enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback` is called in a loop of events from possibly multiple companies in network flow? Let me examine where the loop at 22760 occurs (network subsidiaries) - that is in another function that enriches rows. But collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds isn't called per network company—only when building event modal options and validation. Those occur for current company. So cache per request single company is fine. But controller objects may be reused across requests? Symfony creates a new controller each request (default). So fine. But careful: tests might call the same controller multiple times; not relevant. Not worth flagging, or a low risk? Actually could be worth mentioning because of the fallback catch block within the try that fetches whole members. Hmm, there's a try/catch around the DQL query that on any exception falls back to fetching all members of the company (entire members list) and iterating. If the DQL fails, then... rare. ### Bug candidate B — validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope team_id required for all scoped users. Existing behavior not changed except manager rule replaced; not new. ### Bug candidate C — In the change to the payload validation function, the removed check for people_ids could allow data inconsistency, but the product meeting says pickers never filtered → but that is about UI/ability to pick any member company-wide; the previous server validation allowed only members in team scope. Removing it is aligned. Not flag. ### Bug candidate D — In applySsmaEventManagerAssignment, when canSelect is false and there is no ownLeader, they do NOT set manager. If the manager field required in UI (select required), the event save could still pass? On createEvent path for a plain member with no scope (validation skipped), so saving with manager null. Then "Gestor responsável" would be empty, and fallback fills with creator's superior. In this case, on the view details, "Gestor responsável" may show '—'. That is a display issue; data integrity. Not blocking. Wait actually look at the new UI: ev_manager select is `required` if gestoresList length > 0 and disabled if not canChange. When disabled, HTML disabled fields are NOT submitted. But JS sets manager_id maybe separately (via hidden fields?). In the JS, `evSyncReportedByFieldForType`: after manager default selection set, and if can't change they still set `sel.value = defaultManagerId`; but disabled selects don't submit values; however there's likely syncEvTagHiddens that copies select values into hidden inputs. Let me check _modal_event twig around syncEvTagHiddens and manager field to see if disabled field value is copied to hidden inputs before submit. Actually there's `ev_manager` in a select plus possibly hidden fields. If the select is disabled and contains no value (no leader), the hidden may be empty. Also for a canSelect user, the field is not disabled, and gets searchable. In creation by a member without superior, the select is disabled and value remains empty (defaultManagerId absent) → hidden manager_id empty. Save proceeds (no manager), because scope validation for plain member not run. But for a supervisor (scope present) without superior → hidden manager empty → validation fails with 'Informe o gestor responsável.' and 403, leaving user unable to save at all — with no way to pick (field disabled). That is a genuine blocker for scoped supervisor with no leader immediate. But is the "manager select" required server side? validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope returns 'Informe o gestor responsável.' if managerId <= 0. For a supervisor with scope, yes. Could such a supervisor exist? A "Supervisor de Equipe" is by definition superior of the team members; but is the superior field filled for the supervisor? In hierarchy, a supervisor usually also has a superior (their own manager/gestor). Not guaranteed though. The model says "Responsável" field of the member registration may be optional. So a "Supervisor de Equipe" that has no superior registered would be blocked. Plausible. The severity: could block event registration for some subset; and there's no clear fallback. Report medium. Hmm, but also more common blocker: A **supervisor of a team** registers events on behalf of team members, but per the new rule the manager responsible would be set to the supervisor's own superior (leader immediate). Wait, is that right? applySsmaEventManagerAssignment: for non-canSelect user, sets ownLeader. For supervisors, canSelect false → manager = own leader. But maybe the business rule says manager = the immediate leader of the involved person (or the reporter is a supervisor so manager should be reporter?). Hmm, the docs say: "Gestor responsável = líder imediato de quem está cadastrando." Given a supervisor registers an event on behalf of an employee, manager would be supervisor's boss. Odd but it's what they specified. Anyway. Actually wait—what about a plain "Membro" whose matrix allows registration of own ROS. canSelect false. ownLeader = his superior. So manager_id = superior, matching "Responsável" of the member. Good. Now what about editing: a member with ownLeader null creating event (scope null) — fine, no validation. But later when their leader gets configured, fallback will display. Now let's confirm whether supervisors could create events with scope null (i.e., a member with tag Supervisor puro returns null scope due to line 10266 special case 'Supervisor' → return null; same for Gestor Administrador). So supervisors without team ("Supervisor" puro) would have scope null → skip validation; supervisor de equipe returns parsed teams (their team ids) → scope not null if they have teams; if they have no teams (tag Supervisor de Equipe without team)? parseCompanyMemberTeamIds returns [] → scope []. For scope==[] case, check tech links: supervisors have no tech link → returns error "Seu perfil não está vinculado a nenhuma equipe..." But wait that error existed previously? Hmm, in the old code scope==[] would block for supervisor with no team too; probably correct. So the concern is: Supervisor de Equipe with teams, no superior → validation fails at manager. Medium risk. But hold on — is a supervisor even able to register events? Per #1 fix, the supervisor's matrix can allow; canMemberRegisterOwnOccurrence now returns member != null regardless of supervisor. So yes supervisors register occurrences. And the event default team is their own team. manager = their superior. If none → block. I'll include as medium/high? The rule change intended for the typical hierarchy with superior always set? Possibly the field is mandatory in practice? We don't know. Given uncertainty, medium. ### Bug candidate E — canSelect users (gestores) create events. In applySsmaEventManagerAssignment, when canSelect user submits manager in the request equal to the own leader, but they might not have selected it and don't have an existing manager. Fine. But here's something: For canSelect user (gestor), when `$requested <= 0`, existing == 0, ownLeader set: manager = ownLeader. OK. Potential bug: When canSelect true and requested == existingManagerId (both >0) but the existingManagerId is not in allowed, the condition `$requested === $existingManagerId` triggers acceptance, fine (preserve). But then validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope for canSelect users with scope: managerAllowed requires leader + scope or own leader. If the existing manager belongs to leader + scope of a canSelect user but not included due to the earlier allowed; consistency OK. ### Bug candidate F — The `normalizeSsmaEventManagerInDetails` function (unchanged) runs before assignment; presumably validates manager_id is a CompanyMembers of company? Then applySsmaEventManagerAssignment overrides. ### Bug candidate G — canApproveSsmaOccurrence change: removal of ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR bypass. Review plan issue #4 raises: what about role hierarchy? ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR might be a child of ROLE_MANAGER? In Symfony role hierarchy, if ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR extends ROLE_MANAGER, then isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER') already true, and the removal of ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR doesn't matter for hierarchy. But note the previous code had `ROLE_MANAGER` already granting true for that role, meaning ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR users already passed via ROLE_MANAGER? Hmm, if ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR is not part of hierarchy then those users had implicit bypass, now removed. Let me check security.yaml role hierarchy. Search for ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR role_hierarchy.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR", "file_patterns": ["config/*", "*.yaml", "*.yml"]}
File: config/packages/security.yaml
Match lines: 61
57|        - { path: ^/user/show, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER, ROLE_USER] }
60|        - { path: ^/training, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
61|        - { path: ^/notifications-center, roles: [ROLE_USER, ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
62|        - { path: ^/manager/communication-center, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
63|        - { path: ^/manager/ssma, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER, ROLE_USER], methods: [POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE] }
64|        - { path: ^/manager/ssma, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER, ROLE_USER] }
78|        - { path: ^/manager/process$, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_REVIEWER, ROLE_USER] }
79|        - { path: ^/spaces-control, roles: [ROLE_USER, ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
80|        - { path: ^/manager/hub-in-progress, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
81|        - { path: ^/user/specialist/management_data, roles: [ROLE_USER, ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
82|        - { path: ^/management/update-receipt, roles: [ROLE_USER, ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
83|        - { path: ^/management/update-recipts, roles: [ROLE_USER, ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
84|        - { path: ^/user/specialist/disable, roles: [ROLE_USER, ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
85|        - { path: ^/user/specialist/reactivate, roles: [ROLE_USER, ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
86|        - { path: ^/user/specialist/(pause|resume), roles: [ROLE_USER, ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
87|        - { path: ^/user/specialist/(block|unblock), roles: [ROLE_USER, ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
89|        - { path: ^/employee-advocacy, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
90|        - { path: ^/manager/chavesdeacesso, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
91|        - { path: ^/onboarding/\d+/onboarding-\d+, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
93|        - { path: ^/dei_assessment, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
97|        - { path: ^/manager/governance, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
99|        - { path: ^/manager/home, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER] }
101|        - { path: ^/manager/participantes, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER] }
102|        - { path: ^/manager/company/invoice, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER] }
103|        - { path: ^/manager/processos, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER] }
104|        - { path: ^/manager/user/data, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER, ROLE_REVIEWER] }
105|        - { path: ^/manager/user/show, roles: [ROLE_USER, ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER] }
106|        - { path: ^/manager/process/dashboard/old, roles: [ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN, ROLE_ADMIN, ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER] }
107|        - { path: ^/manager/process/dashboard, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER] }
108|        - { path: ^/manager/professional-assessment/dashboard, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER, ROLE_USER] }
111|        - { path: ^/manager/department, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER, ROLE_USER] }
112|        - { path: ^/manager/organizational-structure, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER, ROLE_USER] }
114|        - { path: ^/manager/users, roles: [ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN, ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR] }
117|        - { path: ^/manager/benefit, roles: [ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN, ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR] }
118|        - { path: ^/manager/skill, roles: [ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN, ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR] }
136|        - { path: ^/manager/training-module/get-data, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
137|        - { path: ^/manager/empresas-parceiras, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
138|        - { path: ^/manager, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_REVIEWER] }
142|        - { path: ^/my-company, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_REVIEWER, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
143|        - { path: ^/crm, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_USER] }
145|        # - { path: ^/my-company/list-members-by-teams/, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_REVIEWER, ROLE_USER] }
146|        - { path: ^/subsidiary-companies, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_REVIEWER, ROLE_USER] }
149|        - { path: ^/calendar-member, roles: [ROLE_SURVEY, ROLE_USER, ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
157|        - { path: ^/muralQuestionario, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
158|        - { path: ^/teste/chat, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
159|        - { path: ^/account, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
160|        - { path: ^/offboarding, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
161|        - { path: ^/onboarding, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
162|        - { path: ^/cultural-hub, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
165|        - { path: ^/time-management, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
166|        - { path: ^/welfare-hub, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
167|        - { path: ^/specialists, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
168|        - { path: ^/cognitive_assessment, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
169|        - { path: ^/templates, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
170|        - { path: ^/gestao-documentos, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
171|        - { path: ^/job, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
172|        - { path: ^/process, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
175|        - { path: ^/sst, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }
180|        - { path: '^/manager/process/\d+(/stage/\d+)?/candidates', roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_REVIEWER, ROLE_USER] }
181|        - { path: ^/manager/live-interview, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_REVIEWER, ROLE_USER] }
182|        - { path: ^/interview/management, roles: [ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, ROLE_USER, ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN] }

code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "role_hierarchy"}
File: .claude/agents/especialistas/symfony/security_specialist.md
Match lines: 2
612|    role_hierarchy:
783|    role_hierarchy:

File: agents/especialistas/symfony/security_specialist.md
Match lines: 2
612|    role_hierarchy:
783|    role_hierarchy:

File: config/packages/security.yaml
Match lines: 2
13|    role_hierarchy:
20|    #role_hierarchy:

Request #20 deepseek-v4-flash P:97.82K C:101 CR:94.59K CW:0 2358ms
Reasoning
Let me read the top of security.yaml role hierarchy (lines 10-30).
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "config/packages/security.yaml", "start_line": 1, "end_line": 56}
File: config/packages/security.yaml (Total lines: 185)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-56
1|security:
2|    # Guard authenticators only — avoid GuardBridgeAuthenticator deprecation (Symfony 5.3+)
3|    enable_authenticator_manager: true
4|    password_hashers:
5|        App\Entity\User:
6|            algorithm: auto
7|
8|    # https://symfony.com/doc/current/security.html#where-do-users-come-from-user-providers
9|    providers:
10|        # used to reload user from session & other features (e.g. switch_user)
11|        app_user_provider:
12|            id: App\Repository\UserRepository
13|    role_hierarchy:
14|        ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN: [ROLE_MANAGER]
15|        ROLE_MANAGER: [ROLE_ALLOWED_TO_SWITCH, ROLE_MANAGER_COMPANY, ROLE_MANAGER_TEAM, ROLE_MANAGER_PDI]
16|        ROLE_GERENTE_CONTA: [ROLE_USER]
17|        ROLE_DIRETOR_COMERCIAL: [ROLE_USER]
18|        ROLE_CS_ALERTAS: [ROLE_USER]
19|        ROLE_FINANCIAL_ALERT: [ROLE_USER]
20|    #role_hierarchy:
21|    #    ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN:       ROLE_ADMIN
22|    #    ROLE_ADMIN:            ROLE_MANAGER
23|    #    ROLE_COMPANY_ADMIN:    ROLE_COMPANY_MANAGER
24|    #    ROLE_COMPANY_MANAGER:  ROLE_USER
25|    #    ROLE_USER:             ~
26|    firewalls:
27|        dev:
28|            pattern: ^/(_(profiler|wdt)|css|images|js)/
29|            security: false
30|        main:
31|            switch_user: { role: ROLE_MANAGER }
32|            # Necessário com enable_authenticator_manager: false (Guard)
33|            provider: app_user_provider
34|            guard:
35|                authenticators:
36|                    - App\Security\LoginFormAuthenticator
37|            logout:
38|                path: app_logout
39|            # Lembrar-me: o formulário envia _remember_me; sem isto o cookie não era gravado.
40|            remember_me:
41|                secret: '%kernel.secret%'
42|                lifetime: 604800
43|                path: /
44|                name: REMEMBERME
45|                secure: auto
46|                httponly: true
47|                samesite: lax
48|            # activate different ways to authenticate
49|            # https://symfony.com/doc/current/security.html#firewalls-authentication
50|
51|            # https://symfony.com/doc/current/security/impersonating_user.html
52|            # switch_user: true
53|
54|    # Easy way to control access for large sections of your site
55|    # Note: Only the *first* access control that matches will be used
56|    access_control:
Request #21 deepseek-v4-flash P:98.67K C:1.16K CR:97.92K CW:0 9133ms
Reasoning
ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR is NOT in role_hierarchy, so it's an independent role. The removal of the bypass for ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR and memberIsSsmaGestorAdministrador is an intended behavioral change per product meeting (documented). So it's not a bug, but a deliberate tightening; could break companies where the approver list isn't populated, but meeting intends that all approvers must be in the list; there is no migration, but the product decision is authoritative. Should I flag a caution? The review plan says it's medium and asks to verify whether the UI and guard are consistent. The change is consistent (both rely on canApproveSsmaOccurrence). This is intended by product, so maybe not blocking, but a concern about lack of data migration - but product says that they must appear only if configured; that's the point. I think not flag. Now, let me focus on the concrete actual suspicious things I can verify in the diff: ### Observation 1 — `canApproveSsmaOccurrence` now checks ROLE_TENANT, but is ROLE_TENANT in hierarchy or used? And removed ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR. Users who were able to approve via ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR previously and who are NOT in the approver list will now lose the button. This is product-intended per docs. Skip. ### Observation 2 — the new `isSsmaEventVisibleUnderOccurrenceTeamDashboardScope` adds early return for creator. But wait: this function is also the visibility gate for updateEvent and getEvent. Combined with canEditSsmaEvent? Let me check canEditSsmaEvent for creator. Might be fine. Actually, consider security: This early return is inside the function that determines whether event appears under team scope. If creator returns true unconditionally even when event belongs to a different company? The check happens after company check in routes (they check event->getCompany() != company → 404). But isSsmaEventVisibleUnderOccurrenceTeamDashboardScope is called also inside listing where occurrences were loaded by company; no cross company. So OK. ### Observation 3 — In the list filter change at line 13306-13313: they added `created_by_member_id === viewerMemberId` as visibility criterion inside team-scope filter. But rows may lack created_by_member_id for legacy SsmaOccurrence rows (non-events) → they use `(int)($o['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0)`. For legacy occurrences the field may not exist; they'd need created_by_id fallback? But appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser is for events. This criterion means if the viewer created the event, then even if team_id is outside their scope they'd see it? For SsmaEvent created_by_member_id = resolved creator. But events visible under team scope filter (list). But events created by viewer with created_by_member_id set will pass. Good - intended. Wait there's a subtlety: For events, created_by_member_id now resolved. But there's also, the filter `$occurrences = array_values(array_filter(...))` with `$o['created_by_member_id']`. If created_by_member_id null (creator user id no longer in members), creator criterion may not match. But the events would still show via team id if within scope. Fine. ### Observation 4 — `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser` when `occurrenceTeamFilterIds === null`? In the branch where scope null, they add events created by current user only when occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== null? Let me look at line 13497 area to see conditions. From diff: ``` if (...) { $occurrences = $this->filterActionsForMember($actionsTaken, $occurrences, $currentMemberId); ... $occurrences = $this->appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser($occurrences, $company, $user); } elseif ($company instanceof Company && $user instanceof User && ($occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== null || $occurrenceAreaFilterIds !== null) ) { $occurrences = $this->appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser($occurrences, $company, $user); } ``` Need context. For plain member (scope null, no area filter), they don't append occurrences created by them? Actually plain member list filtering already includes own events via filterOccurrencesForMember because created_by_member_id equals member. So they'd be included already. The elseif is for supervisor/gestor with area scope etc. Actually plain member with scope null path already includes own events because the filterOccurrencesForMember includes rows where the member is involved (created_by). Hmm, isOccurrenceVisibleToMember includes created_by_member_id === memberId (changed in this diff to resolve created_by_member_id). So own events included. Let me look at the context around lines 13460-13510 to see what conditions trigger the append. Let's read it.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 13420, "end_line": 13530}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 13420-13530
13420|                }
13421|            } else {
13422|                // Membro não encontrado: oculta ambas as abas por segurança.
13423|                $ssmaPreventionInspectionEnabled = false;
13424|                $ssmaPreventionAbordagemEnabled  = false;
13425|            }
13426|        }
13427|
13428|        if ($company instanceof Company
13429|            && !$this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN')
13430|            && !$this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER')
13431|            && !$this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR')
13432|            && !$this->ssmaPreventionHubAccessService->companyHasPreventionMetasBootstrap($company)) {
13433|            $ssmaPreventionInspectionEnabled = false;
13434|            $ssmaPreventionAbordagemEnabled = false;
13435|            $ssmaCanAccessPreventionPanelAndMetas = false;
13436|        }
13437|
13438|        // Colaborador com meta, supervisor ou perfil equivalente: registrar o próprio conteúdo.
13439|        // Gestor cria para outros; supervisor/membro só o próprio (ssmaPreventionMutateOwnOnly).
13440|        // Inclui Supervisor/Gestor de Área via canMutatePreventionContentForCurrentUser.
13441|        if ($company && $user instanceof User) {
13442|            $canMutateOwnInspection = $ssmaPreventionInspectionEnabled
13443|                && $this->canMutatePreventionContentForCurrentUser($company, $user, 'inspecao');
13444|            $canMutateOwnAbordagem = $ssmaPreventionAbordagemEnabled
13445|                && $this->canMutatePreventionContentForCurrentUser($company, $user, 'abordagem');
13446|
13447|            if ($canMutateOwnInspection || $canMutateOwnAbordagem) {
13448|                $ssmaCanCreatePreventionItems = true;
13449|                $ssmaCanEditPreventionContent = true;
13450|            }
13451|        }
13452|
13453|        if ($company && $user instanceof User
13454|            && $ssmaCanEditPreventionContent
13455|            && !$this->canManageAllPreventionContentForCurrentUser($company, $user)
13456|        ) {
13457|            $ssmaPreventionMutateOwnOnly = true;
13458|        }
13459|
13460|        $loggedPreventionMemberId = ($company && $user instanceof User)
13461|            ? (int) ($this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user)?->getId() ?? 0)
13462|            : 0;
13463|        $loggedPreventionUserId = $user instanceof User ? (int) $user->getId() : 0;
13464|        if ($ssmaCanEditPreventionContent) {
13465|            foreach ($inspections as $inspIdx => $inspRow) {
13466|                if (!is_array($inspRow)) {
13467|                    continue;
13468|                }
13469|                $inspections[$inspIdx]['can_mutate'] = !$ssmaPreventionMutateOwnOnly
13470|                    || $this->preventionArrayOwnedByMember($inspRow, $loggedPreventionMemberId, $loggedPreventionUserId);
13471|            }
13472|            foreach ($abordagens as $abIdx => $abRow) {
13473|                if (!is_array($abRow)) {
13474|                    continue;
13475|                }
13476|                $abordagens[$abIdx]['can_mutate'] = !$ssmaPreventionMutateOwnOnly
13477|                    || $this->preventionArrayOwnedByMember($abRow, $loggedPreventionMemberId, $loggedPreventionUserId);
13478|            }
13479|        }
13480|
13481|        if (!$this->canManageSsmaOccurrences()
13482|            && !$ssmaIsTagTeamSupervisor
13483|            && !$ssmaIsTagAreaSupervisor
13484|            && $ssmaProductTagName !== SsmaAreaLimitationScope::TAG_GESTOR_AREA
13485|            && !$this->memberIsSsmaGestorAdministrador($company && $user instanceof User ? $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user) : null)
13486|            && $occurrenceTeamFilterIds === null
13487|            && $occurrenceAreaFilterIds === null
13488|            && !$isTechSpecialistOnly) {
13489|            $currentMember = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
13490|            $currentMemberId = $currentMember?->getId() ?? 0;
13491|
13492|            $occurrences = $this->filterOccurrencesForMember($occurrences, $currentMemberId, $company);
13493|            if ($company instanceof Company && $user instanceof User && $currentMemberId > 0) {
13494|                $occurrences = $this->appendMissingActionLinkedOccurrences(
13495|                    $occurrences,
13496|                    $currentMemberId,
13497|                    $company,
13498|                    $user
13499|                );
13500|                $occurrences = $this->appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser($occurrences, $company, $user);
13501|            }
13502|            $actionsTaken = $this->filterActionsForMember($actionsTaken, $occurrences, $currentMemberId);
13503|        } elseif ($company instanceof Company && $user instanceof User
13504|            && ($occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== null || $occurrenceAreaFilterIds !== null)
13505|        ) {
13506|            $occurrences = $this->appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser($occurrences, $company, $user);
13507|        }
13508|
13509|        // Membro/Inspetor (pessoa física): na Prevenção Ativa só vê inspeções/abordagens em que está relacionado.
13510|        // O filtro por equipe nas ocorrências não deve listar inspeções da equipe inteira para esses perfis.
13511|        // Aura/tenant/SUPER_ADMIN com tag Membro herdada NÃO entram aqui — senão o admin vê
13512|        // só o próprio conteúdo (ex.: 2 inspeções) enquanto o Gestor de Área vê o recorte da gerência (3).
13513|        if ($company && $user instanceof User && $ssmaIsPlainPreventionMember) {
13514|            $plainMemberId = (int) ($this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user)?->getId() ?? 0);
13515|            $plainUserId = (int) $user->getId();
13516|            $inspections = array_values(array_filter(
13517|                $inspections,
13518|                fn (array $row): bool => $this->preventionArrayOwnedByMember($row, $plainMemberId, $plainUserId)
13519|            ));
13520|            $abordagens = array_values(array_filter(
13521|                $abordagens,
13522|                fn (array $row): bool => $this->preventionArrayOwnedByMember($row, $plainMemberId, $plainUserId)
13523|            ));
13524|        }
13525|
13526|        if ($needsPreventionCollections) {
13527|            [$metaFromStr, $metaToStr] = $this->getPrevencaoPeriodDateBounds($metasPeriod);
13528|            [$inspectionsForMetas, $abordagensForMetas] = $this->filterCollectionsForMetasRealizado(
13529|                $inspections,
13530|                $abordagens,
Request #22 deepseek-v4-flash P:101.65K C:1.45K CR:99.71K CW:0 12891ms
Reasoning
There is an important issue to consider: this whole block (13481) applies the member filter to the `$occurrences`. But there's a subtle issue: `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser` adds events the user created. Then later these events also get filtered by other filters? It's placed at end of the pipeline, so events are appended after filtering and might include events from a different type scope. Wait events created by the user but of a type the user may not be allowed to view? Events created by them, they should see. Events from another team scope appended unconditionally. It's intended: creator sees own events. But the elseif branch for team/area-scoped users appends events created by the user that were already filtered out by team/area scope. That might reintroduce events that the creator created while previously in a different team (team scope changed). Acceptable product behavior. Also maybe not restricted by type for tech specialist? Tech specialists (isTechSpecialistOnly) are handled? In the elseif condition, if tech specialist has team scope [] ... they might be in the team-filter path where they filter by their technical types after. The append occurs before technical type filter? Look at ordering: In the earlier section (line 13278-13345) team filter happened. Then tech specialist filter at 13365-13373. Then later at 13481 this member filter block is AFTER the tech filter? Actually 13481 comes after the tech filter block at 13365-13373? No wait. 13365 filter and then 13481 block comes later; events appended at 13500/13506 would bypass the tech-type filter (since appended after). Hmm! The tech specialist path (line 13486-13488) requires occurrenceTeamFilterIds === null etc. Tech specialists have occurrenceTeamFilterIds===[] (not null), so they wouldn't enter the if at 13481. Wait condition: `$occurrenceTeamFilterIds === null` required. Tech specialist returns [] scope → skips if. So tech specialist won't append. Fine. But what about team-scoped supervisors: the elseif appends events created by the current user AFTER the earlier team filter; that could add events created by the user even if created when they were on another team—intended; but also after the earlier area filter? For an area-scoped supervisor (area filter ids not null, team filter null), appended events bypass the area restriction too — same intent: creator can always see own events (from meeting: 'Eventos cadastrados pelo login atual entram na listagem mesmo fora do recorte de equipe'). Intended. There is a subtle: these appended rows have NOT passed through team/area filter, but do they also need to be hidden if the creator is not allowed to see event due to type? They created them, so they can view. OK. Let me now consider a potentially real bug: In `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser`, the events are appended for the current user always, regardless of whether this dashboard call is a read-only consumer or a search API returning limited results. If this is used by search APIs or paged loads, appended events might bypass pagination? Only called in buildSsmaViewData full listing; loadOccurrences paged is used elsewhere. It appends after the listing filter. If the page limits to e.g., 500 rows, appended events could push beyond? This is not the pagination path. OK. Let me think about issue #6 more precisely by reading how the detail view resolves member id keys. AllMembers may exclude... Actually `member_by_id` merges all members (from allMembers). If the creator user is no longer an active member (isRemoved = 1) perhaps excluded from allMembers? loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite may filter isRemoved = 0, so the creator removed from company would not appear; then "Responsável pelo cadastro" shows '—'. Previously manager display fallback would show manager name for non-ROS; for ROS it also would show manager display name. Now shows dash if creator removed and no manager_member. Minor. Let me now check the line at 522: `{% set created_by_lookup_id = occurrence.created_by_member_id|default(occurrence.created_by_id|default(null)) %}`. If created_by_member_id is present but zero (e.g., 0)? `|default` treats 0/''/false as missing → falls back to created_by_id (the user id). If created_by_member_id not resolvable (0) but created_by_id is a User ID (e.g., 99) which coincidentally equals some member id? Wait member_by_id map is keyed by member id; user id fallback was the pre-fix buggy behavior that mislabeled the creator as a member with matching user id. So for events whose creator member could not be resolved (removed member?), they fall back to user id key, which could match a *different* member's id → showing the wrong person as "Responsável pelo cadastro". Before the fix they had the same issue but the map included 'member_<userid>' so mislabeled. But now there's created_by_member_id. If resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId returns null, created_by_member_id stays 0/unset in the row. Then fallback to user id and mislabel potential. But given the current company filter, the creator could have left; then mislabel someone. It's a minor display issue; the fallback was pre-existing. Given that this fallback existed before (created_by_id), and improved now with member resolution, I might mention the display "—" gap but not high. Let me now evaluate #3 area bypass more: I need to double check that canSelect manager's validation path uses only team filter. Yes: applySsmaEventManagerAssignment uses getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds. And validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope also. In buildSsmaViewData, manager scope also includes area. So yes the server side is less restrictive than the UI. But do area-restricted gestores get a team scope null? Let me examine the tag definitions for Gestor de Área. Let's read the SsmaAreaLimitationScope class & how resolveScope works to understand whether getSsmaPreventionAreaScope returns restricted for 'Gestor de Área'. Let's read SsmaAreaLimitationScope and the authorization service resolveScope.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAreaLimitationScope.php"}
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAreaLimitationScope.php (Total lines: 167)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-167
1|<?php
2|
3|declare(strict_types=1);
4|
5|namespace App\Service\Ssma;
6|
7|/**
8| * Escopo de limitação por área organizacional no SSMA.
9| *
10| * Quem tem area_limitation vê a própria área e todas as subáreas (qualquer profundidade).
11| * Nunca vê a área pai nem irmãs fora da subárvore.
12| */
13|final class SsmaAreaLimitationScope
14|{
15|    public const TAG_SUPERVISOR_AREA = 'Supervisor de Área';
16|    public const TAG_GESTOR_AREA = 'Gestor de Área';
17|
18|    /**
19|     * @return list<string>
20|     */
21|    public static function namedAreaScopeTags(): array
22|    {
23|        return [self::TAG_SUPERVISOR_AREA, self::TAG_GESTOR_AREA];
24|    }
25|
26|    public static function shouldApplyAreaLimitation(
27|        ?string $tagName,
28|        ?bool $areaLimitation,
29|        bool $isPlatformAdmin,
30|    ): bool {
31|        if ($isPlatformAdmin) {
32|            return false;
33|        }
34|
35|        // Supervisor (empresa) e Gestor Administrador operam sem recorte de área.
36|        if (in_array($tagName, ['Gestor Administrador', 'Supervisor'], true)) {
37|            return false;
38|        }
39|
40|        if (in_array($tagName, self::namedAreaScopeTags(), true)) {
41|            return true;
42|        }
43|
44|        return (bool) $areaLimitation;
45|    }
46|
47|    /**
48|     * Inclui as áreas raiz e todos os descendentes. Não sobe para pais.
49|     *
50|     * @param array<int, int|null> $parentByAreaId id da área => id do pai (null se raiz)
51|     * @param list<int> $rootAreaIds
52|     *
53|     * @return list<int>
54|     */
55|    public static function expandWithDescendants(array $parentByAreaId, array $rootAreaIds): array
56|    {
57|        $childrenByParent = [];
58|        foreach ($parentByAreaId as $areaId => $parentId) {
59|            $areaId = (int) $areaId;
60|            if ($areaId <= 0) {
61|                continue;
62|            }
63|            $parentId = $parentId !== null ? (int) $parentId : 0;
64|            if ($parentId > 0) {
65|                $childrenByParent[$parentId][] = $areaId;
66|            }
67|        }
68|
69|        $allowed = [];
70|        $queue = [];
71|        foreach ($rootAreaIds as $rootId) {
72|            $rootId = (int) $rootId;
73|            if ($rootId > 0) {
74|                $queue[] = $rootId;
75|            }
76|        }
77|
78|        while ($queue !== []) {
79|            $id = array_shift($queue);
80|            if (isset($allowed[$id])) {
81|                continue;
82|            }
83|            $allowed[$id] = true;
84|            foreach ($childrenByParent[$id] ?? [] as $childId) {
85|                $queue[] = $childId;
86|            }
87|        }
88|
89|        return array_keys($allowed);
90|    }
91|
92|    /**
93|     * Inspeção entra no recorte de área se a equipe está no recorte.
94|     *
95|     * Quando a equipe tem área conhecida fora do recorte, o registro fica escondido mesmo que
96|     * uma pessoa da área participe — é isso que preserva a interseção com a limitação de equipe.
97|     * O fallback por pessoa vale só quando a equipe não informa área: sem equipe, ou equipe
98|     * listada em `$teamIdsWithoutArea` (sem `process_department`).
99|     *
100|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $inspections
101|     * @param list<int> $allowedTeamIds
102|     * @param array<int, true> $allowedMemberIds
103|     * @param list<int> $teamIdsWithoutArea
104|     *
105|     * @return list<array<string, mixed>>
106|     */
107|    public static function filterInspectionsForAreaScope(
108|        array $inspections,
109|        array $allowedTeamIds,
110|        array $allowedMemberIds,
111|        array $teamIdsWithoutArea,
112|    ): array {
113|        $teamIdStr = array_map('strval', $allowedTeamIds);
114|        $withoutAreaStr = array_map('strval', $teamIdsWithoutArea);
115|
116|        return array_values(array_filter(
117|            $inspections,
118|            static function (array $inspection) use ($teamIdStr, $allowedMemberIds, $withoutAreaStr): bool {
119|                $teamId = $inspection['team_id'] ?? null;
120|                $hasTeam = $teamId !== null && $teamId !== '';
121|                if ($hasTeam && in_array((string) $teamId, $teamIdStr, true)) {
122|                    return true;
123|                }
124|                if ($hasTeam && !in_array((string) $teamId, $withoutAreaStr, true)) {
125|                    return false;
126|                }
127|
128|                foreach ([
129|                    (int) ($inspection['created_by_id'] ?? 0),
130|                    (int) ($inspection['safety_responsible_id'] ?? 0),
131|                ] as $memberId) {
132|                    if ($memberId > 0 && isset($allowedMemberIds[$memberId])) {
133|                        return true;
134|                    }
135|                }
136|
137|                foreach ((array) ($inspection['participants_ids'] ?? []) as $participantId) {
138|                    if (isset($allowedMemberIds[(int) $participantId])) {
139|                        return true;
140|                    }
141|                }
142|
143|                return false;
144|            }
145|        ));
146|    }
147|
148|    /**
149|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $abordagens
150|     * @param array<int, true> $allowedMemberIds
151|     *
152|     * @return list<array<string, mixed>>
153|     */
154|    public static function filterAbordagensByMemberIds(array $abordagens, array $allowedMemberIds): array
155|    {
156|        return array_values(array_filter(
157|            $abordagens,
158|            static function (array $abordagem) use ($allowedMemberIds): bool {
159|                $observadorId = (int) ($abordagem['observador_id'] ?? 0);
160|
161|                return $observadorId > 0 && isset($allowedMemberIds[$observadorId]);
162|            }
163|        ));
164|    }
165|
166|}
167|
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "class SsmaPreventionAreaAuthorization"}
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaPreventionAreaAuthorizationService.php
Match lines: 1
24|class SsmaPreventionAreaAuthorizationService

Request #23 deepseek-v4-flash P:104.86K C:110 CR:103.04K CW:0 1785ms
Reasoning
Let me look at resolveScope in the service to understand restricted for area gestor.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Service/Ssma/SsmaPreventionAreaAuthorizationService.php", "start_line": 24, "end_line": 200}
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaPreventionAreaAuthorizationService.php (Total lines: 456)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 24-200
24|class SsmaPreventionAreaAuthorizationService
25|{
26|    public function __construct(private EntityManagerInterface $entityManager)
27|    {
28|    }
29|
30|    public function resolveScope(
31|        Company $company,
32|        ?CompanyMembers $member,
33|        ?PermissionTag $tag,
34|        bool $isPlatformAdmin,
35|    ): SsmaPreventionAreaScope {
36|        if ($isPlatformAdmin || !$member instanceof CompanyMembers) {
37|            return SsmaPreventionAreaScope::unrestricted();
38|        }
39|
40|        if (!SsmaAreaLimitationScope::shouldApplyAreaLimitation(
41|            $tag?->getName(),
42|            ($tag !== null && method_exists($tag, 'getAreaLimitation')) ? $tag->getAreaLimitation() : null,
43|            $isPlatformAdmin
44|        )) {
45|            return SsmaPreventionAreaScope::unrestricted();
46|        }
47|
48|        $areaIds = SsmaAreaLimitationScope::expandWithDescendants(
49|            $this->loadAreaParentMap($company),
50|            $this->memberAreaIds($member)
51|        );
52|
53|        [$teamIds, $teamIdsWithoutArea] = $this->splitCompanyTeamsByArea($company, $areaIds);
54|        $memberIds = $this->collectMemberIdsInScope($company, $areaIds, $teamIds);
55|
56|        // O próprio membro sempre se enxerga, mesmo sem área cadastrada.
57|        $selfId = (int) ($member->getId() ?? 0);
58|        if ($selfId > 0) {
59|            $memberIds[] = $selfId;
60|        }
61|
62|        return SsmaPreventionAreaScope::restricted(
63|            $areaIds,
64|            array_values(array_unique($memberIds)),
65|            $teamIds,
66|            $teamIdsWithoutArea
67|        );
68|    }
69|
70|    /**
71|     * Áreas vinculadas ao membro; sem vínculo, cai para o departamento do cadastro.
72|     *
73|     * @return list<int>
74|     */
75|    public function memberAreaIds(CompanyMembers $member): array
76|    {
77|        $ids = [];
78|        foreach ($member->getMemberAreas() as $memberArea) {
79|            if (!$memberArea instanceof CompanyMemberArea) {
80|                continue;
81|            }
82|            $areaId = (int) ($memberArea->getCompanyArea()?->getId() ?? 0);
83|            if ($areaId > 0) {
84|                $ids[$areaId] = $areaId;
85|            }
86|        }
87|
88|        if ($ids === []) {
89|            $departmentId = (int) ($member->getDepartment()?->getId() ?? 0);
90|            if ($departmentId > 0) {
91|                $ids[$departmentId] = $departmentId;
92|            }
93|        }
94|
95|        return array_values($ids);
96|    }
97|
98|    // ─── Leitura ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
99|
100|    public function canViewInspection(SsmaPreventionAreaScope $scope, SsmaInspection $inspection): bool
101|    {
102|        if (!$scope->isRestricted()) {
103|            return true;
104|        }
105|
106|        $teamId = (int) ($inspection->getTeam()?->getId() ?? 0);
107|        if ($scope->allowsTeam($teamId)) {
108|            return true;
109|        }
110|
111|        // Equipe com área conhecida fora do recorte esconde o registro: pessoa no recorte
112|        // não pode reabrir o que a interseção equipe ∩ área já negou.
113|        if ($scope->teamIsOutsideArea($teamId)) {
114|            return false;
115|        }
116|
117|        foreach ($this->inspectionRelatedMemberIds($inspection) as $memberId) {
118|            if ($scope->allowsMember($memberId)) {
119|                return true;
120|            }
121|        }
122|
123|        return false;
124|    }
125|
126|    public function canViewAbordagem(SsmaPreventionAreaScope $scope, SsmaAbordagem $abordagem): bool
127|    {
128|        if (!$scope->isRestricted()) {
129|            return true;
130|        }
131|
132|        // Mesmo critério da listagem ({@see SsmaAreaLimitationScope::filterAbordagensByMemberIds}):
133|        // é o observador que ancora a abordagem na área.
134|        return $scope->allowsMember((int) ($abordagem->getObservadorId() ?? 0));
135|    }
136|
137|    /**
138|     * @return list<int>
139|     */
140|    private function inspectionRelatedMemberIds(SsmaInspection $inspection): array
141|    {
142|        $ids = [
143|            (int) ($inspection->getCreatorMeta()['created_by_id'] ?? 0),
144|            (int) ($inspection->getSafetyResponsible()?->getId() ?? 0),
145|        ];
146|
147|        foreach ($inspection->getParticipantsIds() as $participantId) {
148|            $ids[] = (int) $participantId;
149|        }
150|        foreach ($inspection->getCompanionIds() as $companionId) {
151|            $ids[] = (int) $companionId;
152|        }
153|
154|        return array_values(array_filter($ids, static fn (int $id): bool => $id > 0));
155|    }
156|
157|    // ─── Gravação ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
158|
159|    /**
160|     * area_limitation: equipe é opcional — o recorte segue as pessoas da gerência.
161|     * Equipe de outra área só é recusada quando permanece no payload (interseção com
162|     * team_limitation). Sem equipe, ou equipe sem área cadastrada, a gravação segue as pessoas.
163|     *
164|     * @param array<string, mixed> $data payload cru de {@see SsmaController::createInspection}
165|     */
166|    public function validateInspectionPayload(
167|        SsmaPreventionAreaScope $scope,
168|        Company $company,
169|        array $data,
170|        ?int $resolvedTeamId,
171|    ): ?string {
172|        if (!$scope->isRestricted()) {
173|            return null;
174|        }
175|
176|        $teamError = $this->validateTeamId($scope, $company, $resolvedTeamId);
177|        if ($teamError !== null) {
178|            return $teamError;
179|        }
180|
181|        $memberIds = [];
182|        if (!empty($data['safety_responsible_id'])) {
183|            $memberIds[] = (int) $data['safety_responsible_id'];
184|        }
185|        foreach ((array) ($data['participants_ids'] ?? []) as $participantId) {
186|            $memberIds[] = (int) $participantId;
187|        }
188|        foreach ((array) ($data['companion_ids'] ?? []) as $companionId) {
189|            $memberIds[] = (int) $companionId;
190|        }
191|        foreach ((array) ($data['deviations'] ?? []) as $deviation) {
192|            if (!is_array($deviation)) {
193|                continue;
194|            }
195|            if (!empty($deviation['responsible_id'])) {
196|                $memberIds[] = (int) $deviation['responsible_id'];
197|            }
198|        }
199|
200|        return $this->validateMemberIds($scope, $company, $memberIds);
Request #24 deepseek-v4-flash P:106.89K C:753 CR:104.96K CW:0 7606ms
Reasoning
For a Gestor de Área: `shouldApplyAreaLimitation` returns true for namedAreaScopeTags → restricted if member has area ids. So getSsmaPreventionAreaScope restricted for area gestor; restricted scope implies area filter ids non-null (area-restricted). Then modal options intersect area members. But applySsmaEventManagerAssignment server-side applies team scope only. Since Gestor de Área's tag is not a team scope tag name, and no team limitation; getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds for Gestor de Área returns? parsed teams might be empty → then if tag not in team scope list and no team limitation and viewerTeams null, and parsed [] and tag not null... Actually let me trace getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds for area gestor: returns parsed (their own teams) if the tag is in ssmaTeamScopePermissionTagNames (no), or if tag->getTeamLimitation() true (probably false for area tags), then getSsmaViewerTeamIds (roles-based SSMA viewer roles? area gestor probably not SSMA viewer role), then if tag != null && parsed === []: if tech types exist return [] else return null. So if area gestor has no teams → returns null. Then in applySsmaEventManagerAssignment, scope null → allowed = all company leaders. So server-side bypasses the area restriction. Then validation too (scope null → return null). So a Gestor de Área in area X could set manager_id = leader from area Y. This is a genuine server-side missing area check. But also—how does the same area gestor's UI options list behave? The options list is built with area intersection; so this is inconsistent. That's a legit medium security/authorization finding (crafted request). Also the error message says "escopo de equipe/área" but validation only enforces team. Wait—does applySsmaEventManagerAssignment actually matter for events created within the modal? Because canSelect users can change manager in the select; but if they select an option outside their area, the UI select won't contain it. A crafted request could specify manager_id outside. Then the server accepts. In terms of consequence, manager_id shows responsible manager; possibly gives that manager visibility to the occurrence in their listing (visibility via manager_id in own scope if manager belongs to some scope? Actually the occurrence would show to the leader who is manager_id only if within that leader's team scope etc.). Manager could view the event detail under scope filter (manager_id in their team? filter includes manager_id in memberIdsInTeams of that manager's team). So a leader from another area would get visibility of the event? They only see if their own team scope includes them. Anyway, domain-scope violation. So issue #3 is valid and worth reporting (medium). Let me also confirm that no other server-side check on the area scope applies to event payload (e.g., validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope is the only event payload scope validation). Search for event area validation. There could also be validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstAreaScope? Let me search.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstArea|AreaScope.*Event|event.*AreaScope"}
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "function normalizeSsmaEventManagerInDetails"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
28572|    private function normalizeSsmaEventManagerInDetails(array $data, Company $company): array

Request #25 deepseek-v4-flash P:107.7K C:111 CR:107.52K CW:0 2091ms
Reasoning
Let me read normalizeSsmaEventManagerInDetails to see if it validates manager in some scope (company-wide).
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 28540, "end_line": 28618}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 28540-28618
28540|        $can = $member instanceof CompanyMembers
28541|            && $type !== ''
28542|            && $this->ssmaOccurrenceTypeConfig->memberCanDescharacterizeForType(
28543|                $company,
28544|                (int) $member->getId(),
28545|                $type
28546|            );
28547|        if ($can) {
28548|            return $data;
28549|        }
28550|
28551|        $details = isset($data['details']) && is_array($data['details']) ? $data['details'] : [];
28552|        foreach (['descaracterizado', 'descaracter_comment'] as $key) {
28553|            if ($existingDetails !== null && array_key_exists($key, $existingDetails)) {
28554|                $details[$key] = $existingDetails[$key];
28555|            } else {
28556|                unset($details[$key]);
28557|            }
28558|            unset($data[$key]);
28559|        }
28560|        $data['details'] = $details;
28561|
28562|        return $data;
28563|    }
28564|
28565|    /**
28566|     * Resolve manager_id a partir de manager_name quando o front/LLM só enviou o nome.
28567|     *
28568|     * @param array<string, mixed> $data
28569|     *
28570|     * @return array<string, mixed>
28571|     */
28572|    private function normalizeSsmaEventManagerInDetails(array $data, Company $company): array
28573|    {
28574|        $details = $data['details'] ?? [];
28575|        if (!is_array($details)) {
28576|            return $data;
28577|        }
28578|
28579|        $rawId = $details['manager_id'] ?? null;
28580|        if ($rawId !== null && $rawId !== '') {
28581|            $details['manager_id'] = (int) $rawId;
28582|            $data['details'] = $details;
28583|
28584|            return $data;
28585|        }
28586|
28587|        $name = trim((string) ($details['manager_name'] ?? ''));
28588|        if ($name === '') {
28589|            return $data;
28590|        }
28591|
28592|        $membersById = [];
28593|        $members = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)
28594|            ->findBy(['company' => $company, 'isRemoved' => 0]);
28595|        foreach ($members as $cm) {
28596|            if (!$cm instanceof CompanyMembers) {
28597|                continue;
28598|            }
28599|            $memberId = (int) $cm->getId();
28600|            if ($memberId <= 0) {
28601|                continue;
28602|            }
28603|            $label = $this->ssmaMemberDisplayLabel($cm);
28604|            if ($label === '') {
28605|                $label = (string) ($cm->getEmail() ?? '');
28606|            }
28607|            if ($label !== '') {
28608|                $membersById[$memberId] = ['name' => $label];
28609|            }
28610|        }
28611|
28612|        $resolvedId = $this->resolveCompanyMemberIdByDisplayLabel($name, $membersById);
28613|        if ($resolvedId > 0) {
28614|            $details['manager_id'] = $resolvedId;
28615|            $data['details'] = $details;
28616|        }
28617|
28618|        return $data;
Request #26 deepseek-v4-flash P:108.71K C:746 CR:107.78K CW:0 7120ms
Reasoning
So the manager assignment/validation is as I described. The area gap is real. However, consider: For the canSelect users, what's the semantics of manager scope? Per docs: "Lista do select, quando Gestor edita: interseção de (3.1) pessoas que são superior de alguém e (3.2) pessoas do escopo de equipe/área do gestor." So the product expects the manager to be within the scope. Since the server should enforce too but doesn't for area, this is a gap. I'll report it (medium). Given there's a meeting rule documented in the code comments saying the manager should belong to scope; validation error text says team/area; and the modal applies area restrictions. A crafted request bypasses. I'm fairly confident this is worth reporting. But is the difference meaningful given that only the area scope is applied in the picker for a user that is a Gestor de Área, but the same area restriction may also be applied for list filtering on creation of events (the occurrence team defaults)? Hmm. Actually, wait: could there be a later check that team_id and details for the event creation with area scope is validated by another validate function like validateEventPayloadAgainstAreaScope called in createEvent? Let's search for "PrevencaoAreaScope" uses in event creation paths. There could be validation in `createInspection` only for inspections, not events. Events are under occurrences not prevention. And buildSsmaViewData area scope is the "Prevention Active" scope which is applied to occurrence listing? Wait, occurrences listing uses getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds and area scope (occurrenceAreaFilterIds). But creation of an event doesn't check the area scope at all? Let me confirm area scope appears in createEvent... not seen. Indeed no area validation in createEvent/updateEvent except within validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope (only team) and buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions for UI options. So there is a general gap: events can be registered with team_id/people outside area by area gestors? Not sure that area scope even should apply to events creation. But the modal restricts options to the area. UI restricts teams list for area: teamsForEventModal filtered by area, team default etc. The manager default set to own leader; if own leader outside area? They forced inclusion. Anyway. I'll report the inconsistency as medium: applySsmaEventManagerAssignment + validate use only team scope, whereas the option list uses area∩team; a crafted request from an area-restricted gestor can assign a manager outside their scope. Now issue #2/medium. Let me confirm the modal JS for member/supervisor to see if the disabled select can still cause default to be submitted. Let's examine _modal_event.html.twig around ev_manager and the JS reading and submitting manager_id to make sure if default selected (via SSMA_EVENT_FORM_DEFAULTS) on disabled select, the payload contains manager_id. Let me read the relevant JS sections around ev_manager and submission to see whether they read value of disabled select.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig", "start_line": 200, "end_line": 280}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig (Total lines: 7818)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 200-280
200|           BLOCO 2 — Contexto do evento
201|        ══════════════════════════════════════════ #}
202|        <h5 class="ssma-form-section text-primary">Contexto do evento</h5>
203|
204|        <div class="form-row ev-meta-fields-row align-items-start">
205|            <div class="col-12 col-md-6">
206|                <div class="form-group mb-0">
207|                    <label class="ev-meta-field-label" for="ev_datetime">Data e horário do evento <span class="text-danger">*</span></label>
208|                    <input type="datetime-local" class="form-control" id="ev_datetime" name="ev_datetime" required>
209|                    <small class="ev-meta-field-hint-spacer" aria-hidden="true"></small>
210|                </div>
211|            </div>
212|            <div class="col-12 col-md-6 ev-location-stack-col">
213|                <div class="form-group mb-0">
214|                    <label class="ev-meta-field-label" for="ev_location">Local do evento <span class="text-danger">*</span></label>
215|                    <select class="form-control" id="ev_location" name="ev_location" required>
216|                        <option value="" selected>Selecione o Local</option>
217|                    </select>
218|                    {% include 'ssma/partials/_ssma_location_hint.html.twig' with {
219|                        empty_hint_id: 'ev_location_hint',
220|                        manage_hint_id: 'ev_location_manage_hint',
221|                        spaces_link_id: 'ev_location_spaces_link'
222|                    } %}
223|                </div>
224|                <div id="ev-gmr-slot-under-local" class="ev-gmr-context-slot">
225|                    <div class="form-group mb-0" id="ev-gmr-wrap">
226|                        <label class="ev-meta-field-label" for="ev_gmr" title="Gestão de maior risco">GMR</label>
227|                        <select class="form-control" id="ev_gmr" name="ev_gmr">
228|                            <option value="">Selecione o GMR</option>
229|                            {% include 'ssma/partials/_ssma_gmr_options.html.twig' %}
230|                        </select>
231|                        <small class="ev-meta-field-hint-spacer" aria-hidden="true"></small>
232|                    </div>
233|                </div>
234|            </div>
235|        </div>
236|
237|        {# GMR fica abaixo do Local (todos os tipos, inclusive ROS). #}
238|
239|        <div class="form-group" id="ev-manager-field-wrap">
240|            <label for="ev_manager" id="ev-manager-label"><span id="ev-manager-label-text">Gestor responsável</span> {% if gestoresList|length > 0 %}<span class="text-danger">*</span>{% endif %}</label>
241|            <select class="form-control" id="ev_manager" name="ev_manager" {% if gestoresList|length > 0 %}required{% endif %}{% if not ssmaCanChangeEventManager|default(false) %} disabled{% endif %}>
242|                <option value="" disabled selected hidden></option>
243|                {% for g in gestoresList %}
244|                    {% set _gReg = g.registration|default('') %}
245|                    {% if _gReg == '' %}
246|                        {% set _gReg = '%07d'|format(g.id) %}
247|                    {% endif %}
248|                    <option value="{{ g.id }}"
249|                            data-name="{{ g.name|e('html_attr') }}"
250|                            data-position="{{ g.position|default('')|e('html_attr') }}"
251|                            data-avatar="{{ g.avatar|default('')|e('html_attr') }}"
252|                            data-area="{{ g.area|default('')|e('html_attr') }}"
253|                            data-team-name="{{ g.team_name|default('')|e('html_attr') }}"
254|                            data-registration="{{ _gReg|e('html_attr') }}">{{ g.name }}</option>
255|                {% endfor %}
256|            </select>
257|            {# Equipe removida da UI — team_id segue oculto e preenchido pelo gestor. #}
258|            <input type="hidden" id="ev_team_id" name="ev_team_id" value="">
259|            <div id="ev_manager_preview" class="d-none mt-2"></div>
260|        </div>
261|
262|        <div class="form-group" id="ev-people-field-wrap">
263|            <label for="ev_people_select">Pessoa(s) envolvida(s) <span class="text-danger">*</span></label>
264|            <select class="form-control" id="ev_people_select" name="ev_people_select">
265|                <option value="" selected disabled>Selecione quem estava envolvido</option>
266|                {% for member in allMembers %}
267|                    <option value="{{ member.id }}"
268|                            data-name="{{ member.name }}"
269|                            data-registration="{{ member.registration|default('%07d'|format(member.id)) }}"
270|                            data-position="{{ member.position|default('') }}"
271|                            data-supervisor="{{ member.supervisor_name|default('') }}"
272|                            data-gerencia="{{ member.gerencia|default(member.area|default('')) }}"
273|                            data-shift="{{ member.work_shift_label|default('') }}">{{ member.name }}</option>
274|                {% endfor %}
275|            </select>
276|            <div id="ev_people_tags" class="d-flex flex-wrap mt-2"></div>
277|        </div>
278|
279|        <div class="form-group">
280|            <label for="ev_witnesses_select">Testemunhas</label>
Request #27 deepseek-v4-flash P:110.88K C:183 CR:109.44K CW:0 2901ms
Reasoning
Important: `ev_manager` is a `select` with `required`. When disabled (`disabled` attribute), browsers ignore the field in form submission. But if they submit via FormData from JS and read `.value` directly (JS), disabled select's value is still readable via JS. Need to see how the payload is built — probably via $('#ev_manager').val() etc. Let's find syncEvTagHiddens and submission collecting ev_manager. Search in the template for 'ev_manager'.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "ev_manager", "file_patterns": ["templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig"]}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig
Match lines: 18
240|            <label for="ev_manager" id="ev-manager-label"><span id="ev-manager-label-text">Gestor responsável</span> {% if gestoresList|length > 0 %}<span class="text-danger">*</span>{% endif %}</label>
241|            <select class="form-control" id="ev_manager" name="ev_manager" {% if gestoresList|length > 0 %}required{% endif %}{% if not ssmaCanChangeEventManager|default(false) %} disabled{% endif %}>
259|            <div id="ev_manager_preview" class="d-none mt-2"></div>
3131|            var reportedBy = String((document.getElementById('ev_manager') || { value: '' }).value || '').trim();
4313|            shared.initSearchableMemberField($('#ev_manager'), {
5029|            $('#ev_manager_preview').addClass('d-none').empty();
5244|        var sel     = document.getElementById('ev_manager');
5918|        var $preview = $('#ev_manager_preview');
5920|        var managerId = String(($('#ev_manager').val() || '')).trim();
5933|            ? shared.memberMetaFromSelection(managerId, $('#ev_manager option:selected'), window.SSMA_EV_MEMBERS_BY_ID || {})
5947|    $(document).on('change', '#ev_manager', function () {
5955|        $('#ev_manager').val('').trigger('change');
5994|            '#ev_manager',
6280|        if (det.manager_id)               evSetVal('ev_manager', det.manager_id);
6609|        $('#ev_manager').trigger('change');
6731|                    evSetVal('ev_manager', String(defs.manager_id));
6739|                    $('#ev_manager').trigger('change');
7010|            manager_id:       document.getElementById('ev_manager').value,

Request #28 deepseek-v4-flash P:111.51K C:1.97K CR:110.98K CW:0 17566ms
Reasoning
Line 7010 reads document.getElementById('ev_manager').value - for a disabled select, JS can still read .value. So manager_id is included in payload even if disabled. Line 6280 sets ev_manager on edit from details (evSetVal). Let's read the JS around 5220-5300 (evSyncReportedByFieldForType) and 6700-6750 and 7000-7020 for payload building. Also check if there is any HTML required validation issue for disabled required field - disabled fields are ignored by constraint validation and don't block form submit. So if no value selected in a disabled required select, submission still works via JS building manager_id empty (undefined). Then the server validation would reject manager missing when user has scope... but for plain members scope null so no block; for supervisors (scope) there might be block. Wait: Actually is `ev_manager` value defaulted to own leader in modal create by JS? In the modal initialization, defaults manager set (SSMA_EVENT_FORM_DEFAULTS). Let me read 6600-6750 to understand defaults flow (they may set via JS after load based on $ssmaEventFormDefaults). The select options built from gestoresList which includes the own leader (buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions always includes ownLeaderId). For member/supervisor without superior, gestoresList may be empty if there are no leaders in company at all; or non-empty if leaders exist. Since can't select (disabled) and no ownLeader to default, manager empty. Then validation team-scope (supervisor) fails with 'Informe o gestor responsável'... but at least if the company has leaders (leaderIds not empty) and user is in scope, allowed = leaders ∩ scope, but they can't select because disabled; default empty because ownLeader null. That yields a block even though other leaders exist in scope. So even a supervisor with team scope whose superior isn't set could NOT pick any other leader (since field disabled). The old code for supervisor would default manager to... hmm, in old code (pre-change) modal defaults used the current member for default manager for supervisor (they set default manager = currentMember if present among gestores list). And for plain members, manager = own member id (self). So even without superior, they could proceed. Now without superior → blocked. Actually wait, before this change a supervisor had isSsmaViewer() returning true and thus couldn't register at all? No - isSsmaViewer relates to actions, not event creation? Actually bug #1 removed `if ($this->isSsmaViewer()) return false` inside canMemberRegisterOwnOccurrence. So prior to this PR, supervisors couldn't register own occurrences (they were blocked). But after this PR, supervisor CAN register, and the default manager is own superior. If they have no superior, they can't complete. So the number of affected users: supervisors whose superior is not configured in the members' hierarchy (company may not use that field) → block. But how often does hierarchy field 'superior' get filled? If the module is built around the superior being the responsible manager, then maybe companies that use the module always fill it. Yet small companies might set superior = self? If superior set to self? Then ownLeaderId = own id; but leaderIds includes own id (as superior of self). And the manager == self works. Hmm if they set self as responsible, then the self isn't a "leader of at least one other active member" except self; leaderIds will contain own id. Validation allows own leader override anyway. I think the strongest medium finding I can report for #2 is the case where a member/supervisor who can register and has team scope has no `superior` filled: default remains empty and the field is disabled with no other option to select, so every attempt to save is rejected server-side. Combined with blocked "the person" data. Let me confirm this path requires team scope. For a "Supervisor de Equipe" with teams in cadastro, scope = parsed teams. Wait for tag supervisor de equipe, scope = parsed (member's teams). Supervisors' teams in cadastro... Yes. Actually wait, supervisors register their own occurrences; validate team scope requires team_id from the scope. The supervisor would be in their own team (their own team membership). So team_id belongs to scope. So manager block applies. I'll report #2 as medium severity (blocked registration for scoped members without configured superior), referencing the disabled select in the modal. Let me re-check whether ev_manager select is disabled for supervisors. ssmaCanChangeEventManager = canSelectSsmaEventResponsibleManager() = true only for ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN/ROLE_MANAGER/ROLE_TENANT/gestor tags. So supervisors: canSelect false → select disabled. But is there a scenario where managerId set to default? ownLeaderId null → no default. So yes, supervisor (can register via matrix) without a superior would be stuck. Also on create, default ownLeader present in the options list ensures select contains own leader, so if supervisor has superior, default set in JS (line 6731 evSetVal from defs). Fine. Actually, hold on: for create modal, is `SSMA_EVENT_FORM_DEFAULTS.manager_id` set? In the diff line 13189, `$ssmaEventFormDefaults['manager_id'] = $ownImmediateLeaderId;` So if not null, JS sets manager at line 6731. Good. If null → no manager. For plain member without superior: canCreate their own ROS with no manager → scope null → saved with manager null → fallback blank. Not a blocker but data odd. Only team-scope users blocked. So my medium finding scope is narrower: supervisors/team gestors (supervisor? no, gestor can select manager and can choose from leaders in scope; even if own leader null, if there are leaders in their team scope they could select). Wait for a Gestor de Equipe, canSelect true, so field enabled; they could pick another leader even without superior. So the block is specifically for supervisor de equipe/supervisor types with team scope who are not gestor and lack superior. Also for supervisor de área? They have area filter but area scope is not team scope; but occurrenceTeamFilterIds null? Actually area supervisor tag 'Supervisor de Área' → getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds? Area supervisor is not team tag; might have viewerTeams null; parsed teams = [] (maybe they belong to no team). Then tag->getTeamLimitation? probably false → return null (no team scope). Validation skipped; no block. So issue mainly for Supervisor de Equipe/legacy role-based viewers with team scope lacking superior. OK, that's specific enough but plausible. Medium. Wait — actually the user probably always has superior filled if they supervise others? not necessarily. Actually supervisor de equipe = "is superior of some people", so by definition they are the superior of team members; but do *they* have their own superior set? It might be optional and often set. In small flat companies the top supervisor may have no superior. I'll report medium/low with clear description. Hmm let's assess likelihood of false positive reporting; reviewers requested "only report defects that are likely real". Since the validation says manager must be a leader immediate (someone's superior) OR own leader. For team-scope supervisors, if their superior exists, manager = superior (is a leader of at least the supervisor) so allowed. So OK for most. Only missing-superior blocks. And is that considered intended? The docs say "Membro/supervisor vê o campo preenchido e não edita." implies it's always filled (default from superior). It presumes superior exists. Given that a scoped supervisor with no superior gets a *hard block* with no fallback at all, it's a defect in boundary condition. I'll report as medium but frame it as boundary condition. Also, note: For a member whose superior is null, but canSelect false, on *create* there's no existing manager, and ownLeader null → manager blank. On *update* of an event originally with manager blank (or manager set previously), existing manager preserved. Fine. Let me verify the JS at 6731 to be sure defaults applied only when not editing. Let me read around 6690-6760 and 6990-7030.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig", "start_line": 6690, "end_line": 6760}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig (Total lines: 7818)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 6690-6760
6690|            if (window.__ssmaEvCreateMode === 'ros') {
6691|                modalTitle.textContent = 'Novo ROS';
6692|            } else if (window.__ssmaEvCreateMode === 'event') {
6693|                modalTitle.textContent = 'Novo evento';
6694|            } else {
6695|                modalTitle.textContent = 'Nova ocorrência';
6696|            }
6697|        }
6698|        var generalPanelCreate = document.getElementById('ev-step-general');
6699|        if (generalPanelCreate) generalPanelCreate.classList.remove('is-readonly');
6700|
6701|        if (typeof initEvTagSelectsOnce === 'function') {
6702|            initEvTagSelectsOnce();
6703|        }
6704|        evResetCreateUiState();
6705|        if (typeof evInitTypeSelectFromConfig === 'function') {
6706|            evInitTypeSelectFromConfig();
6707|        }
6708|        evApplyDatetimeMax();
6709|        evApplyAuraTitleStatusVisibility('create');
6710|        if (typeof window.renderEvCategorySelect === 'function') {
6711|            window.renderEvCategorySelect('', '');
6712|        }
6713|
6714|        var typeEl = document.getElementById('ev_type');
6715|        applyTypeBlock((typeEl && typeEl.value) ? typeEl.value : '');
6716|        ensureClassificationDefaults('', true);
6717|        evDefaultDatetimeToday();
6718|
6719|        if (window.SSMA_IS_AURA_ADMIN) {
6720|            evSetVal('ev_title', '');
6721|            evSetVal('ev_status', 'ABERTO');
6722|        }
6723|
6724|        (function applyEvCreateDefaults() {
6725|            var defs = window.SSMA_EVENT_FORM_DEFAULTS || {};
6726|            if (!defs || typeof defs !== 'object') {
6727|                defs = {};
6728|            }
6729|            function apply() {
6730|                if (defs.manager_id) {
6731|                    evSetVal('ev_manager', String(defs.manager_id));
6732|                }
6733|                if (defs.team_id) {
6734|                    evSetVal('ev_team_id', String(defs.team_id));
6735|                }
6736|                ensureClassificationDefaults('', true);
6737|                var $ = window.jQuery;
6738|                if ($) {
6739|                    $('#ev_manager').trigger('change');
6740|                    $('#ev_team_id').trigger('change');
6741|                }
6742|                if (typeof window.EvModal.syncTagHiddens === 'function') {
6743|                    // Evita regravar draft vazio logo após limpar a criação.
6744|                    var _persist = typeof evPersistDraftSoon === 'function' ? evPersistDraftSoon : null;
6745|                    if (_persist) {
6746|                        window.__ssmaEvSkipDraftPersist = true;
6747|                    }
6748|                    window.EvModal.syncTagHiddens();
6749|                    window.__ssmaEvSkipDraftPersist = false;
6750|                }
6751|                evFilterInjuredPersonSelect();
6752|                evSyncDescaracterUi();
6753|                evSyncContainmentTimeEnabled();
6754|                evSyncInjuryClassificationByLeave();
6755|                evSyncDerivedSeverityFromConsequence();
6756|            }
6757|            if (typeof window.requestAnimationFrame === 'function') {
6758|                window.requestAnimationFrame(function () { apply(); });
6759|            } else {
6760|                window.setTimeout(apply, 0);
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig", "start_line": 6990, "end_line": 7030}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig (Total lines: 7818)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 6990-7030
6990|
6991|        var occurrenceTime = '';
6992|        if (dtIso && /^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}T\d{2}:\d{2}/.test(dtIso)) {
6993|            occurrenceTime = String(dtIso).slice(11, 16);
6994|        }
6995|
6996|        var payload = {
6997|            type:             type,
6998|            origin:           'MANUAL',
6999|            datetime:         dtIso,
7000|            occurrence_time:  occurrenceTime,
7001|            location:         document.getElementById('ev_location').value,
7002|            gmr:              (document.getElementById('ev_gmr') || { value: '' }).value,
7003|            description:      descCombined,
7004|            consequence:      document.getElementById('ev_consequence').value,
7005|            potential_consequence: document.getElementById('ev_potential_consequence').value,
7006|            impacts:          impacts,
7007|            activity:         document.getElementById('ev_activity').value,
7008|            approach:         approachVal,
7009|            title:            titleTxt,
7010|            manager_id:       document.getElementById('ev_manager').value,
7011|            people_ids:       peopleIds,
7012|            witness_ids:      (document.getElementById('ev_witness_ids') || { value: '' }).value,
7013|            team_id:          teamVal,
7014|            unit_id:          teamVal || null,
7015|            responsible_ids:  (document.getElementById('ev_responsible_ids') || { value: '' }).value,
7016|            strategic_nature: (document.getElementById('ev_strategic_nature') || { value: '' }).value,
7017|            area_label:       (document.getElementById('ev_area_label') || { value: '' }).value.trim(),
7018|            evidences:        evEvidences.slice()
7019|        };
7020|
7021|        var catWrap = document.getElementById('ev-category-wrap');
7022|        var catSel  = document.getElementById('ev_category');
7023|        if (catWrap && catSel && !catWrap.classList.contains('d-none')) {
7024|            var catVal = (catSel.value || '').trim();
7025|            if (catVal) {
7026|                payload.category = catVal;
7027|            }
7028|        }
7029|
7030|        var cd = document.getElementById('ev_classifier_dano');
Request #29 deepseek-v4-flash P:115K C:11.01K CR:113.41K CW:0 84682ms
Reasoning
Payload reads `ev_manager` value directly from the disabled select. Confirms. Now for a scoped supervisor with no superior, create modal default manager missing, select disabled, so payload manager_id empty, server validates scope → returns 403 'Informe o gestor responsável.'. Registration blocked. Medium. Let me confirm the exact trigger path: for scoped supervisor with `occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== []`. That condition depends on team assignments; if they have teams, yes. Also update path: if the user isn't the original creator (i.e., they're editing an event), but event manager set to the creator's leader... For aprofundamento-only etc., validation still applies. Hmm. In updateEvent by a specialist with scope etc... This is out of scope of user review but let me not go deeper. Given how big this review is, I should focus on reporting well-supported issues: 1. **[medium] Server-side manager assignment/validation ignores area scope** (issue #3). Report on applySsmaEventManagerAssignment or validate function. 2. **[medium] Scoped supervisor (can't select) without `superior` → hard 403 with no fallback** (issue #2). Report on validate function (manager requirement) or applySsmaEventManagerAssignment. 3. **[medium?] Removal of people-involved scope validation is actually intended by docs — skip.** Do not report. Actually wait, we should double-check that issue #1's removal of the people check is indeed what the review plan flagged as high. Docs confirm intended per product. Since docs are authoritative (same PR), report nothing. 4. **[low/medium performance] N+1 in mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow / enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback** (issue #5). Possibly add. 5. **[low] Test coverage** (issue #7): The standalone test duplicates logic but doesn't test the endpoint; per rules, PR changed permission behavior without functional tests. Flag as low "Atenção"? Rules for test file say if PR changed behavior and didn't add functional test, signal as pendência (Atenção; Crítico if flow involves authorization). This is an authorization flow change. The test file only duplicates a helper function; no functional coverage. Report medium maybe. 6. Template change hiding people for ROS? I'm unsure. Skip. 7. The canApproveSsmaOccurrence change: product intended. But there's an internal inconsistency: canApproveSsmaOccurrence now allows ROLE_MANAGER (a "plataforma" role) to approve without being in list; docs call it same guard umbrella as canEditOccurrenceDetail. Fine intended. But there's one notable consequence: In viewOccurrence's approver branch (line 3355) uses canApproveSsmaOccurrence to load occurrence detail for approvers not otherwise visible. Now Gestor Administrador bypass removed, so only listed approvers can view detail from that branch. Intended. However, there is a subtle contradiction: The docs claim ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR was removed because gestor admin shouldn't get bypass; but what about ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR users in the UI "ssma_is_gestor_user" flag etc.? Not relevant to approval. Let me double check whether removing `ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR` in canApproveSsmaOccurrence while leaving it in `canEditOccurrenceDetail` guard etc. is consistent with meeting. It is. Now, is there a potential real bug where ROLE_MANAGER (hierarchy: ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN -> ROLE_MANAGER) can approve, whereas ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR (company-level manager gestor, likely the SSMA gestor user) cannot; this is intended per meeting: only config list and platform admin. OK. Let me verify that `$this->isGranted('ROLE_TENANT')` in the changed function: tenant is platform tenant; is ROLE_TENANT a super-admin-level role? Either way. Now let me check template occurrences view: `member_by_id` etc. The possible bug for the template is the 'Responsável pelo cadastro' section shown for all types even when created_by unavailable and manager_member fallback mislabels manager as the "responsável pelo cadastro". But that's a fallback not present before? Before this change, ROS showed "Relatado por" = manager or creator. Actually for ROS they displayed reported_by_member = manager_member ?: created_by_member. Wait the old code: `{% set reported_by_member = manager_member ?: created_by_member %}` and manager_display_name fallback. Under old code the label was "Relatado por" and showed manager first; so for ROS old data with manager id = reporter, it shows manager name. Fine. Now let me decide about issue #6: The template's fallback key 'member_' ~ created_by_id (user id) when created_by_member_id is missing (0/unset). The member map indexed by member ids. Events loaded from `loadOccurrences` are mapped via mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow which now populates created_by_member_id using resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId — but this returns null if the user has no current active member record (removed). In that case created_by_member_id stays missing; template falls back to created_by_id (user id) and looks up member_by_id['member_' + userid]; may or may not be a valid member. AllMembers is built from loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite with isRemoved? Wait allMembers contains only active members presumably. If the creator user left company, likely no match. Then the section shows '—'. Slight regression from old display which could at least show manager name (if manager present). Actually in old code, for ROS (the "Relatado por" case), it also used `reported_by_member = manager_member ?: created_by_member`; if neither matched but `occurrence.manager_display_name` set, it showed the name text. New code for the top block drops manager_display_name fallback entirely (only shows '—' if created_by_member and reported_by_member missing). But manager display in the second block would still show manager_display_name. So overall the 'Responsável pelo cadastro' being '—' while manager shown below. Minor. I'll report a low note on template fallback dropping manager_display_name and old user-id-mismatch fallback? Might be noise. Let me skip it, or fold into a low-severity comment about the 'created_by_member_id' empty fallback with user id. Actually, let me reconsider the template change more: it now shows "Responsável pelo cadastro" and "Gestor responsável" blocks for ALL event types including ROS. Fine. Wait — there's another important one I should verify: **In the occurrence view when the viewer is a plain member that created a ROS/event, the event might not appear because loadOccurrences for the detail view uses visibility filter isSsmaEventVisibleUnderOccurrenceTeamDashboardScope plus member filter?** Not needed. Let me also verify the modal change: `shared.initSearchableMemberField($('#ev_manager'), ...)` now only runs when `window.SSMA_CAN_CHANGE_EVENT_MANAGER`. When can't change (member/supervisor), the ev_manager select is plain with limited options list (leaders only + own leader). But the default manager for the member is their leader; is their leader in `gestoresList`? gestoresList built from buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions with keep = leaderIds ∩ scope? plus ownLeaderId always. So yes, default in options. Good. But what about the creation for a plain member: canSelect false; if they have no superior, manager empty, and the select is disabled but required. However, ev_manager is `required` but disabled → the required attr won't block JS submission. But if the JS submits with manager_id empty then server (member scope null) doesn't validate manager, and event saves without manager. Then the "Gestor responsável" in view empty, fallback tries creator's superior and may be empty. Not ideal but not block. OK time to be decisive about final set of comments. Also, verify issue about `collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds` caching single company across subsidiary processing. Let me search where buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions/applySsmaEventManagerAssignment may be called with different company in the same request (e.g., network subsidiaries aggregations). applySsmaEventManagerAssignment is called only in createEvent/updateEvent (single company). buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions called in buildSsmaViewData (single company). validate... single company. So caching OK. But there is another subtle: `ssmaImmediateLeaderMemberIdsCache` is a per-instance array on a controller that extends AbstractController. Controllers are not shared across requests typically. Fine. However, consider that the DQL `createQueryBuilder()->select('DISTINCT IDENTITY(cm.superior) AS sid')->from(CompanyMembers::class...)` uses `IDENTITY` in select; Doctrine ORM select with IDENTITY may need alias of relation: `IDENTITY(cm.superior)` works. Fine. Now, let me reconsider whether to report the change in validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope requiring manager in leader ids for update path — the case where the event's existing manager (historically stored, e.g., old data where manager = self reporter or non-leader gestor) will now cause **editing of that event to fail** for users with team scope. This is a real regression path: supervisors/team gestors with scope editing pre-existing events where manager_id not a current "leader" (i.e., doesn't match a superior relationship). In old data, manager may be an arbitrary gestor or reporter (self). Since editing is now gated by this validation and cannot be changed (field disabled for non-gestor editors), those events become non-editable (403). Even for gestor editors (can select) editing an existing event whose manager is not a leader of someone nor in scope: applySsmaEventManagerAssignment on edit preserves existing manager? Let's check: for canSelect user, requested = payload manager_id (the existing from form) - when editing, the form is loaded with the existing manager. requested = existing manager; allowed check fails unless existing == existing? Wait requested == existingManagerId? In update, existing details from event include manager. Data merges existing event data with payload in canFullEdit path (array_merge($this->eventToValidationArray($event), $data)). So details.manager_id = existing (unless payload overwrote). requested = existing. Condition: requested > 0 && (isset($allowed[$requested]) || $requested === $existingManagerId). requested === existing → true → keeps manager. Then validation at 10429: managerAllowed = leaderIds[manager] && allowedMembers[manager] OR ownLeader==manager. If existing manager is not a leader immediate of someone (e.g., legacy reporter), then fails → 403. So yes, updating any event whose manager_id isn't a "leader" would fail for a scoped editor even if the manager field isn't changed and they can't change it. That is a real backward-compatibility issue (data integrity: old events may have manager IDs who are not superiors of anyone). But who edits with scope? A team gestor editing events of their team: canFullEdit? Let me check canEditSsmaEvent. Given uncertainty whether such editing scenario is common, I think it's a legitimate medium finding about validation blocking edit of existing records. But it's an edge. Given the amount, I'll report a consolidated comment on the validation function that covers both the missing-superior registration block and legacy manager edits? They're both manifestations of the new manager validation that presumes "superior filled and leader of someone" and doesn't provide fallback. Might merge into a medium comment focusing on the missing superior scenario, because it is the review plan's #2 high. Given instructions: precision over recall; only report likely defects. I'll pick these comments: 1. **Server-side manager assignment ignores area scope** — in applySsmaEventManagerAssignment (medium). 2. **Boundary: no-superior + team scope ⇒ registration blocked** — in applySsmaEventManagerAssignment / validate (medium). 3. **Validation blocks editing of legacy events whose manager_id is not a leader/own leader** (part of #2/edge). Could merge into #2 or separate? I'll make it part of the comment on validate manager rule: add that editing existing records with historical manager not matching leader rule returns 403; suggest allowing preservation of existing manager in edit mode. 4. **N+1 performance** low. 5. **Test quality** — standalone test duplicates helper logic; suggest functional test. Given test rules say this is authorization flow (create/update events) → critical? Actually rule: "Se a PR alterou comportamento e não trouxe teste novo/atualizado cobrindo esse comportamento, sinalize como pendência (Atenção; Crítico se o fluxo for autorização, dinheiro, exclusão ou estado)." The behavior change is about who can select manager and who can approve; authorization-flavored. The test provided does not hit endpoints. So I'd rate it medium and recommend a functional/endpoint test. This aligns with user-specific rules for tests. 6. Maybe comment on `canApproveSsmaOccurrence` removal of implicit bypass as caution? Given no migration. But docs confirm product intent and say it's deliberate. Not a defect. Skip? The rule for issue #4 says "If some company relies on implicit bypass and has no approver list, no one can approve after deploy; no migration inserts old approvers". This is a real deployment concern, but it's a product decision documented and deliberate (the whole point). Since this review group includes the docs? docs files are not in review group (other files changed list includes docs md and README, but not in review group). Hmm, the docs are in the other-changed-files list. In the review group we only have 4 files. Still, I can consider docs context. Since product explicitly decided to remove the bypass and validate by list, flagging it would contradict the requirement. Skip. Let me more carefully verify finding #1's reachability, specifically that a "Gestor de Área" gets canSelect true and scope null. canSelect true: canSelectSsmaEventResponsibleManager returns true for Gestor de Área tag. Good. Does the event-modal allow such a user to create events at all? canMemberRegisterOwnOccurrence true (member exists) plus matrix; or ssmaCanRegisterNewOccurrence. Gestor de Área is not 'Gestor de Equipe'/'Gestor Administrador' but canMemberRegisterOwnOccurrence covers via member with matrix allowed types. They may register only types granted by matrix. Some may register events. In such a case their UI select lists only leaders within their area scope; server accepts any leader company-wide. So inconsistency is real when they create/register. But wait: when creating with canSelect true, own leader default present in options; the default own leader is the user's superior, which may be outside area? buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions includes ownLeaderId unconditionally, so the UI default could be outside their area too (but that's the explicit product rule—the own leader default always included). But if own leader also outside area, then UI itself permits default manager outside area. Hmm that undermines the "area isolation" claim: the options already include own leader regardless of scope (product rule). But that's for default. The gap is that the server accepts **any** leader in company for a canSelect user whose UI restricts to scope. So the modal list filters area; a crafted request could bypass that and set manager outside area (except own leader default which is allowed anyway). So severity moderate. Actually the field also appears in "member picker modal" for managers? Hmm. Let me confirm the code comment "Responsible manager options" includes leader ids ∩ scope; canSelect gestures; yes. OK. Also confirm the UI for canSelect user is enabled (select) — yes. Now for comment #2: I want to verify that createEvent for a scoped supervisor without superior actually occurs. Wait but do Supervisors register occurrences *on behalf of others* in their team? The new rule says default manager is registrar's leader. Hmm, but for supervisor the manager select disabled, meaning the product decided supervisors cannot choose; they only see their own leader default. If they don't have a leader, block. OK. I'll produce these comments. Also evaluate #4 about canApprove as potential: I'll not report. Let me also verify that the validation `validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope` runs in updateEvent even when existing manager_id > 0 (already stored) and not in leaderIds but details unchanged → they'd get 403. The old code (before this PR) for the update path would use $allowedMembers from team scope and require manager in that map (old check: 'O gestor responsável deve pertencer a uma das suas equipes ou ser um gestor cadastrado no SSMA.'). So it was already restrictive but allowed gestor cadastrado no SSMA (any SSMA gestor tag). Now even stricter: must be an immediate leader in scope. Legacy events where manager is an SSMA gestor (not immediate leader of anyone) can no longer be updated by scoped editors → a data-migration concern. But again an edge. Alright — I'll include a combined medium comment on this specific change in validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope and applySsmaEventManagerAssignment highlighting both legacy-data edit block and missing-superior create block, but better one comment each since separate areas. Given each comment needs code snippet & suggestion. Let me anchor: - Comment on validate function lines 10427-10435. - Comment on applySsmaEventManagerAssignment lines 12304-12345 area scope. - Comment on mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow line 15590 for N+1? Anchor with created_by_member_id resolve. - Comment on test file. - Comment on twig? Maybe low on fallback. - Possibly comment on canApprove? skip. Let me also verify the twig ROS people involved block: to double-check whether it is a regression, I need the "before" code. Since I only have the after file and diff, I can reason from the diff we saw in review files. The removal hunks show only the if/else Relatado por block removed. The block Pessoa(s) envolvida(s) context is shown with `+{% if not is_ros_occurrence %}` added just before it. But in the original, where exactly was the "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" block relative to the if/else? The diff shows removed lines ended at `{% endif %}` and then context of `Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)` with the new if guard. Wait, but there was context line before removal? Actually the removed hunk start included: ``` - {% if is_ros_occurrence %} ... - </div> - {% else %} ... - </div> - {% endif %} ``` Wait, in old code maybe the structure was: ``` {% if is_ros_occurrence %} Relatado por block {% else %} Gestor responsável block Pessoa(s) envolvida(s) block {% endif %} ``` Then in the new code, both sections are always shown, and the Pessoa block is shown only when `not is_ros_occurrence` (preserving the old else-only semantics). That would make sense! Because the old code had the "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" inside the else branch (non-ROS). Let's re-read the diff precisely: Original hunk region old lines 924-960 (37 lines): ``` {% if is_ros_occurrence %} <div class="mb-3">Relatado por {% if reported_by_member %} avatars {% elseif manager_display_name %} name {% else %} — {% endif %} </div> {% else %} <div class="mb-3">Gestor responsável {% if manager_member %} avatars {% elseif manager_display_name %} name {% else %} — {% endif %} </div> {% endif %} <div class="mb-3"> Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)... ``` Wait, if the Pessoa block context lines begin right after the removal and are unchanged, but the new guard added `{% if not is_ros_occurrence %}` — that indicates Pessoa block existed for ALL types, and now the guard hides it for ROS. That's the difference. Because if the Pessoa block were inside the else branch originally, it would have been included in the removed lines (part of the 37 removed lines) not kept as context. Since it appears as context (unchanged) preceded only by an inserted guard, original had it unconditional. Hmm, but was the Pessoa block originally between the two sections (before ROS if)? It's possible the original code order was: ``` <div class="mb-3"> Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)... (all types) {% if is_ros_occurrence %} Relatado ... {% else %} Gestor ... {% endif %} ``` But given the diff positions the guard right before Pessoa block and the removal happens just above, the original order was: - (context lines above, e.g., Equipe) - removed lines: the if/else block - added guard - context: Pessoa block This strongly suggests Pessoa block followed the if/else in original and applied to all types. New behavior hides for ROS. Given ROS = where people involved matter most (e.g., a ROS is an unsafe act/condition involving a person?). I don't have enough domain context to call it a bug. It could be intended: for ROS they might consider the involved person = the one making the report (creator). The docs changed meaning: "Responsável pelo cadastro" = login que iniciou o registro. For a ROS, the reporter = involved person. So ROS doesn't show "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" separately to avoid duplication? Actually for ROS maybe the involved person is exactly shown via "Responsável pelo cadastro" (the report is personal). That would align with the original concept that ROS reporter = person physically who registered. So maybe intentionally removed. Skip to avoid false positive. Let me finalize comments and check precise code lines in diff for anchoring. Comment 1: area scope gap. Anchor on lines in applySsmaEventManagerAssignment: ``` $allowed = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company); $scope = $this->getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds($company, $user); ``` Existing code: these are newly added lines (from diff). Good anchors. Severity: medium. Category security? maybe "security" or "bug". I'd say security (authorization scope). But it's more functional data isolation. Use category security. Comment 2: legacy manager edit block & missing superior. Anchor validate function lines: ``` $leaderIds = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company); $ownLeaderId = $this->resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId($company, $user); $managerAllowed = isset($leaderIds[$managerId]) && isset($allowedMembers[$managerId]); if ($ownLeaderId !== null && $ownLeaderId === $managerId) { $managerAllowed = true; } if (!$managerAllowed) { return 'O gestor responsável precisa ser líder imediato de alguém e pertencer ao seu escopo de equipe/área.'; } ``` These are new lines. Good. Actually combine the two scenarios into a single comment? I'll write two separate comments because scenarios differ in remedy: - Comment A: no fallback when member has no superior / not leader - blocks create for scoped non-gestor members. - Comment B: updating existing event whose stored manager isn't a current leader now 403 - data migration/backward compatibility. Both anchored in same snippet lines. The tool may allow overlapping anchors but might be OK. Let me pick distinct anchors: - A anchor: `$managerAllowed = isset($leaderIds[$managerId]) && isset($allowedMembers[$managerId]);` lines 10429-10435 (just those 3 lines) - B anchor: same... overlapping. Hmm. Maybe do a single comment that covers both, since they share root cause: the validation presumes manager must be a "leader immediate" present in scope (or own leader). I'll produce one medium comment describing both implications, suggesting to keep existing manager when editing (already preserved by apply) and to permit default of own leader else allow registration... But apply already preserves existing manager; the validation still rejects a non-leader existing manager in the update path. So suggestion: when editing and manager_id unchanged (requested == existing), skip leader validation; and when creating a member without superior, do not hard-block. Ok. Comment 3: performance N+1. Anchor line `'created_by_member_id' => $this->resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId($e->getCompany(), $e->getCreatedById()),` in mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow. Severity low/medium. In this diff line added. Wait, but resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId was newly added with cache and this call is in map. Actually map line 15590 is added in this diff. Yes. Comment 4: test coverage. Anchor on the standalone test helper function or the class. Since test is newly added; review comment on tests file: "este teste não passa pelo controller..." Severity low. Category test. Also mention that the test has two meaningless last assertions ("Evento some...", "Criador volta a ver...") that don't test anything (99 !== 10 and 10===10). Could flag as low. Should I include comment 6 about canApprove? Given product decision strong, skip. Should I mention the removal of people-in-scope validation? Based on meeting transcripts it's intended. Skip. But maybe mention that the removal happened while the validation helper (the function) name claims "AgainstTeamScope" still validating people removed silently in earlier change? No, not in this diff. Let me also verify issue #6 template low: I think it's fine because created_by_member_id is always resolved in event list mapping; but the resolution can fail (creator removed/no member row) and template falls back to created_by_id user-id key that won't match → '—'. But that's same as before. Skip to avoid false positives. Now, re-check the actual reachability of the canSelect bypass by area gestor with respect to which API call path. applySsmaEventManagerAssignment is invoked inside createEvent/updateEvent. The manager requested from the payload manager_id gets validated in validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope: managerAllowed = leader && team-scope member, or own leader. For area gestor with scope null team filter, validation returns null (skipped). Wait for area gestor getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds probably returns null (no teams). So validation passes for any manager (as long as normalization kept). But normalizeSsmaEventManagerInDetails only casts manager_id to int (no existence check). But applySsmaEventManagerAssignment restricts requested to allowed = all leaders in company; if the requested manager is not a leader immediate of someone company-wide, allowed check fails and falls back to existing or ownLeader. So an area gestor can only assign a leader immediate, but any leader immediate in the whole company, even outside area. That's the bypass. Consequence: event manager can be outside their area, giving that (outside-area) leader responsibility/visibility for an event they shouldn't be tied to. Yes. For validation comment B (legacy manager edits): I should double check that existing events often have manager id not equal to a leader. Legacy behavior: for plain member ROS, manager = reporter himself. Reporters could be plain members not superior of anyone. For a scoped editor (e.g., team gestor) editing those events: they pass canFullEdit? Team gestor canFullEdit? canEditSsmaEvent probably true for gestor of their scope. So they would hit the block. This may be plausible. But wait applySsmaEventManagerAssignment when editing: existing manager = reporter id; canSelect (team gestor) true; requested = existing; keep existing. validate: leaderIds[reporter]? likely false → error 'O gestor responsável precisa ser líder...'. So the team gestor editing an old ROS event created by a now-plain-member reporter cannot save even to just add aprofundamento? If they add aprofundamento only - merge includes existing details? Actually aprofundamento only doesn't merge full event (only aprofundamento fields). But validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope is called in updateEvent regardless (after data prepared). For aprofundamento-only by a team gestor, the merged payload is the subset of aprofundamento fields? mergeSsmaEventAprofundamentoOnlyPayload maybe merges the full payload. Let me not go down too far; the finding remains: existing events with manager not matching the leader rule cannot be edited by scoped users. It's worth flagging as backward-compat risk with medium. Wait, however, there might be an existing code: applySsmaEventManagerAssignment preserves existing manager only if canSelect true allowed... Actually if !canSelect and existing >0 keep existing. Then validate would fail if existing not in leaderIds ∩ team. For a supervisor who cannot select and edits their own event where manager was set to reporter=self (old style) - for scoped supervisor? Old code didn't allow supervisors to register, but a supervisor may edit events in their team (canEditSsmaEvent maybe allow supervisors edit? Unclear). This is enough. I'll now assemble comments. Let me set anchors precisely with exact diff text: Comment 1 area scope in applySsmaEventManagerAssignment. Snippet lines (from file 12320-12327): ``` $allowed = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company); $scope = $this->getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds($company, $user); if ($scope !== null) { $teamMembers = $scope === [] ? [] : $this->collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams($company, $scope); $allowed = array_intersect_key($allowed, $teamMembers); } ``` Comment 2 anchor validation lines 10427-10435: ``` $leaderIds = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company); $ownLeaderId = $this->resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId($company, $user); $managerAllowed = isset($leaderIds[$managerId]) && isset($allowedMembers[$managerId]); ``` And include return line. Comment 3 perf anchor line 15590: ``` 'created_by_member_id' => $this->resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId($e->getCompany(), $e->getCreatedById()), ``` Comment 4 test anchor: lines from the test that define assignManager helper: ``` function assignManager(bool $canSelect, ?int $ownLeaderId, int $requested, int $existing, array $allowed): int ``` Wait for test file: the rule says comments must be in Portuguese etc. Keep concise. Anchor on the header comment + function. Use snippet: ``` $keepMember = keepResponsibleManagers($leaders, null, 10); ``` Better anchor near end: ``` ok('Evento some para o criador se só olhar manager_id (regressão)', 99 !== 10); ok('Criador volta a ver se created_by_member_id == ele', 10 === 10); ``` This is clearly tautological. Good anchor. Comment about missing functional test: anchor near beginning: ``` /** * Regra Brenda 03/09/2026 — Gestor responsável = líder imediato. * php tests/Ssma/ssma_event_manager_leader_rule_standalone.php */ ``` But anchor must be newly added code lines, matches diff. Yes new file. I think comment 2 is the strongest overall, then comment 1. Wait, let me reconsider whether the validation function anchor lines belong to the change - yes they're new replacement lines. Let me also think again: For the update scenario, is the validation even called for update when the user cannot edit? updateEvent calls it after canFullEdit or aprofundamento merges. But in aprofundamento-only the details might be partial (only aprofundamento) but after mergeSsmaEventAprofundamentoOnlyPayload presumably only aprofundamento fields. If details.manager_id absent from partial payload and event->getDetails manager exists? The payload from merge includes... let me read mergeSsmaEventAprofundamentoOnlyPayload? Might keep existing details. If manager missing in the data details, validate at line 10423 managerId 0 → return 'Informe o gestor responsável.' even though the manager is stored in event but not in payload. Wait updateEvent loads existing event and, for canFullEdit path, merges eventToValidationArray. For aprofundamentoOnly non-full edit, mergeSsmaEventAprofundamentoOnlyPayload($event, $data) merges the aprofundamento fields into full event data? Let me check. If the merged data doesn't include manager_id, then managerId computed 0 → validation errors with 'Informe o gestor responsável.' for any scoped aprofundamento-only update (e.g., a supervisor specialist finalizing aprofundamento) → could block specialists! But before change this same validation existed and had managerId<=0 → 'Informe o gestor responsável.'? Wait, in the old code (removed lines) also had: ``` $managerId = (int) ($details['manager_id'] ?? 0); if ($managerId <= 0) { return 'Informe o gestor responsável.'; } ``` That part unchanged (it is context lines? Actually the diff shows the managerId <= 0 check `if ($managerId <= 0) { return 'Informe...` was context? In the diff at 10423-10426: ``` $managerId = (int) ($details['manager_id'] ?? 0); if ($managerId <= 0) { return 'Informe o gestor responsável.'; } - $gestorEligible = ... ``` Yes lines 10423-10426 unchanged; only the eligibility block replaced. So behavior for managerId 0 unchanged. Aprofundamento path already worked before (or fails as before). Not changed. So B should only talk about legacy manager not being leader. In old code, manager just needed to be in gestorEligible OR allowedMembers (in scope). So old managers like SSMA gestor tags in scope pass. New rule requires leader immediate too → some old managers would now fail → regression for editing. Good. But maybe most old managers are already leaders? Under old plain-member ROS rule, manager = reporter; reporter is rarely a leader → those events edited by team gestors with scope might now be blocked. However: can a team gestor edit an event where manager=plain reporter and not in their scope? The old check required manager in allowedMembers (team scope) OR gestor cadastrado. The reporter plain member (in their team scope) passes old check. So old events edited by team gestor had manager = reporter in scope. New check fails because reporter not a leader. Regression confirmed conceptually. Alright, final set of comments: 1. validate manager new rule: backward compatibility/regression for existing events + no fallback for member without superior (medium/high). I'll present as medium. 2. area scope missing in server-side assignment/validation (medium/security). 3. N+1 perf (low). 4. test coverage (low/test). Also maybe a comment about template created fallback dropping manager_display_name when creator unknown? I'd skip. Wait, we need to consider also that perhaps with these changes, **the review_plan says high #1** removal of people check server-side was a high issue. But docs say intended. Since docs authoritative, and the PR summary is this exact feature, I'll trust docs. So not reporting as high. Let me also check whether maybe other endpoints for events (like getEvent/detail) use visibility to not include people? no. Now before writing comments, also double check the severity of comment #1 (area) - it says security scope. In the modal UI the manager select options restrict to scope. But the "responsible manager" isn't exactly access control, it's a responsibility assignment. But there is a privacy implication that manager outside the area becomes responsible for the event → the "Gestor responsável" will see the occurrence in their dashboard, and gets notified. Also could later be asked to validate. So it is cross-scope data linking. Medium. Let me confirm: the area-scope gap also affects validation, but there's another angle: perhaps the same "canSelect" user without team scope (area restricted) also can choose a team for the event via the team select (teamsForEventModal restricted to area) and set a people involved outside area (allowed per product). The manager being outside area is the issue. Now write comments. Ensure Portuguese and per template format: simple first sentence explaining impact. Provide suggestions with code snippet `suggestion_code` where feasible. Let me craft each. **Comment 1 (validate new manager rule):** content (pt-BR): "Com essa nova regra, o gestor informado precisa ser 'líder imediato' de alguém dentro do escopo (ou o próprio superior de quem salva). Em eventos antigos, o manager_id gravado era o relator da ROS (pessoa física) ou um gestor por tag, que normalmente não é superior de ninguém; ao editar essas ocorrências num perfil com escopo de equipe, a validação devolve 403 mesmo sem o usuário alterar o campo. Além disso, um supervisor/membro com escopo de equipe que não tenha 'Responsável' preenchido no cadastro fica sem gestor default (campo travado) e sem conseguir salvar. Sugestão: na edição, quando manager_id não mudou, preservar o valor existente sem exigir a regra de líder; e na criação, quando não há superior cadastrado, não bloquear com 403 (deixar salvar com gestor vazio para fallback de exibição ou permitir escolha) até a hierarquia ser corrigida." Anchored on lines: ``` $leaderIds = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company); $ownLeaderId = $this->resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId($company, $user); $managerAllowed = isset($leaderIds[$managerId]) && isset($allowedMembers[$managerId]); if ($ownLeaderId !== null && $ownLeaderId === $managerId) { $managerAllowed = true; } ``` Severity medium (or high? it can block register + edits). I'd choose medium. Hmm, since user-specified issues #2 high, but we can't confirm hierarchy absence. Keep medium. **Comment 2 (area scope gap):** Anchor on applySsmaEventManagerAssignment allowed scope snippet lines. content: "O seletor do modal limita o 'Gestor responsável' ao escopo de equipe E área (linhas ...managerScopeIds intersect com área), mas esta atribuição no servidor e a validação validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope só cruzam com getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds. Um Gestor de Área (escopo de área restrito, sem equipe) pode enviar via request um manager_id de outro setor/área e o backend aceita, porque o filtro de time devolve null e libera todos os líderes da empresa. Alinhe a validação/atribuição com o mesmo recorte de área usado na construção das opções (getSsmaPreventionAreaScope), senão o controle aplicado no front vira apenas cosmético." Severity security/medium. **Comment 3 (N+1):** Anchor mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow line. content: "resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId é chamado para cada evento na listagem (mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow roda em loadOccurrences para todos os eventos da empresa) e depois enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback ainda faz find() por linha sem manager_id. O cache por request reduz repetição por par empresa/usuário, mas numa empresa com muitos criadores distintos isso vira N+1 a cada render do dashboard (o limite é 500+ linhas). Considere resolver os IDs num único SELECT WHERE user IN (...) agrupado por usuário, ou já trazer o member_id no SQL da listagem." Severity performance low/medium. I'd do medium? The rule says performance only if evidence of meaningful scale. Given loadOccurrences full-load is used and docs mention cap 500 with list pages; 500 queries per dashboard could be real. But many events share creators; worst-case maybe 500. Choose low/medium; I'll use low severity to be safe? Hmm, review-plan says medium. I'll use medium? In PHP guidelines "Performance issues with meaningful data scale". The mapping loops all events of a company; a company with hundreds of distinct event creators triggers hundreds of queries per page. I'll set severity low (since cache reduces repeats and queries are indexed). Actually a findBy on company+user+isRemoved is indexed; 500 queries ~ could be dozens of ms. I'd call low. **Comment 4 test file:** Two aspects: tautological assertions + no functional coverage. Anchor: ``` ok('Evento some para o criador se só olhar manager_id (regressão)', 99 !== 10); ok('Criador volta a ver se created_by_member_id == ele', 10 === 10); ``` content: "Essas duas últimas asserções são tautologias (99 !== 10 e 10 === 10): não executam buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions nem applySsmaEventManagerAssignment. Além disso, todo o arquivo apenas duplica a lógica das funções em helpers locais — não passa pelo endpoint de criação/edição de evento nem pela validação validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope. Como a PR altera regra de permissão (quem pode trocar gestor/validar), vale cobrir o fluxo real com teste funcional para não deixar regressão de autorização passar." Severity low/test. Let me maybe drop the twig issue? Also the review plan asks us to review each file. Let's also consider _modal_event.html.twig: only UI changes. Any issue there? The disabled select for non-gestores could prevent form submission if HTML5 validation? A disabled required select won't trigger required validation (disabled fields excluded). So no. It's fine. But there's the new flow: When can't change, they never call initSearchableMemberField (because condition `SSMA_CAN_CHANGE_EVENT_MANAGER`). But the ev_manager select now has a plain <select> with options = leaders only. And they're disabled; disabled inputs are not focusable; but user can still see selection; it doesn't allow scroll? fine. For canSelect users, they call initSearchableMemberField with remoteExtraParams responsible_manager:1. And this list gets rebuilt from the server options (gestoresList limited to scope). But note initSearchableMemberField converts the select into a searchable field, meaning the list may be fetched remote; but the select's original options are also limited to scope leaders; remote search sends responsible_manager param and server will filter by leader scope with `$forResponsibleManager` branch returning allowed member map. This branch uses occurrenceTeamFilterIds + areaScope but NOT leader-only filtering? Wait the picker `responsible_manager=1` branch computes $scopeIds = team members; and intersect with area; then allowed = scopeIds or leaderIds? Let me re-read first hunk: ``` if ($forResponsibleManager) { $leaderIds = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company); $ownLeaderId = ... $scopeIds = null; $occurrenceTeamFilterIds = getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds(...); if (... !== null && ... !== []) { $scopeIds = collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams(...) } $areaScope = getSsmaPreventionAreaScope(...); if ($areaScope->isRestricted()) { $areaMemberMap = $areaScope->allowedMemberIds(); $scopeIds = ... intersect ... } $allowedMemberMap = $scopeIds === null ? $leaderIds : array_intersect_key($leaderIds, $scopeIds); if ($ownLeaderId...) $allowedMemberMap[$ownLeaderId] = true; } ``` Wait this code in the "members" picker for `responsible_manager` is an **AJAX** endpoint used by `initSearchableMemberField` in the modal? This is presumably the method that lists company members for pickers (the code around line 9139). The endpoint returns members filtered to allowedMemberMap, where allowed includes only leaders (scope), ensuring remote search results are scope-limited leaders + own leader. Good. This is consistent. But then the submit flow: For canSelect area gestor, options list limited by area. The remote picker consistent. But the server-side assignment bypass still allows non-scope. So comment 2 stands. One more angle: In the remote search with `responsible_manager=1`, they include own leader (even if outside area). The submit of own leader outside area also accepted (product default). So the "allowed" already includes own leader. The gap for arbitrary leaders outside area remains via crafted payload. Now let me finalize. However, I realize I need to double check comment #1 anchor existing code lines match diff exactly (new lines). Lines added in diff for validation: ``` + $leaderIds = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company); + $ownLeaderId = $this->resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId($company, $user); + $managerAllowed = isset($leaderIds[$managerId]) && isset($allowedMembers[$managerId]); + if ($ownLeaderId !== null && $ownLeaderId === $managerId) { + $managerAllowed = true; + } + if (!$managerAllowed) { + return 'O gestor responsável precisa ser líder imediato de alguém e pertencer ao seu escopo de equipe/área.'; + } ``` Yes. For comment about area scope in applySsmaEventManagerAssignment, lines added: ``` + $allowed = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company); + $scope = $this->getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds($company, $user); + if ($scope !== null) { + $teamMembers = $scope === [] + ? [] + : $this->collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams($company, $scope); + $allowed = array_intersect_key($allowed, $teamMembers); + } ``` Good anchors. But wait: These are in the diff as added lines within applySsmaEventManagerAssignment - yes all function is added. Comment #3 line: ``` + 'created_by_member_id' => $this->resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId($e->getCompany(), $e->getCreatedById()), ``` Added. good. Comment #4 in test new file lines added. Now, before writing, is the canApproveSsmaOccurrence change worth a comment about `ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR` removal causing approver rights loss where approver list empty? No, because product confirmed it. And per review checklist, the meeting says this removal is correct. Skip. Also, the review task says cross-file observations encouraged. Fine. Let me also consider whether there is a potential issue with the `manager_id` in event view row for legacy SsmaOccurrence (non-event) where created_by_id fallback resolution looks up members for created_by_id even for non-event occurrences? enrichOccurrenceManagerFields now calls enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback for **all** occurrence rows, including legacy SsmaOccurrence rows. For legacy occurrences, created_by_id field may be a member id or user id? In legacy occurrence rows, created_by_id may actually be a *member* id or a *user* id? enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback treats it as a user id and calls resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId, which queries members where user = created_by_id. If legacy occurrences store a member id in created_by_id, the resolution would look up a CompanyMembers whose user field equals that id (which likely yields nothing or wrong member). Then created_by_member_id remains blank → falls back to created_by_id in template (member id) → matches member_by_id correctly. If legacy occurrence's created_by_id is actually a user id, then resolution finds the member. If the legacy value is a member id, resolution finds no member with user=that id... but could there be a member whose user id equals the member id of another? possible collision. Also enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback for legacy rows with manager_id <=0 tries entityManager->find(CompanyMembers, createdByMemberId). If resolution mistakenly maps to a member with user id equal to the stored member id value — e.g., created_by_id = 10 (member id), and some other member has user id 10 → resolves to that other member → wrong manager fallback assigned! This is an actual bug risk for legacy occurrence rows where created_by_id semantics = member id (need to check semantics). For legacy SsmaOccurrence, is created_by_id a user or member? Let's check mapSsmaOccurrenceEntityToListRow mapping to see whether created_by_id = member id or user id. Also template previously treated occurrence.created_by_id as member key (so legacy occurrences must have created_by_id = member id; otherwise bug #4b was specifically about *events* where created_by_id is a user id; they resolved it. Legacy occurrence's created_by_id may indeed be a member id). If legacy created_by_id = member id, then enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback doing resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId(member id) is wrong (member id treated as user id) — would set created_by_member_id to some unrelated member (or null), and then for events? Hmm. Let's verify mapSsmaOccurrenceEntityToListRow.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "private function mapSsmaOccurrenceEntityToListRow"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
15073|    private function mapSsmaOccurrenceEntityToListRow(SsmaOccurrence $row, array $teamsById): array

Request #30 deepseek-v4-flash P:126.07K C:102 CR:125.95K CW:0 1828ms
Reasoning
Read around 15073-15120 to see created_by_id.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 15073, "end_line": 15120}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 15073-15120
15073|    private function mapSsmaOccurrenceEntityToListRow(SsmaOccurrence $row, array $teamsById): array
15074|    {
15075|        $managerId = $row->getManager()?->getId();
15076|        $teamId = $row->getTeam()?->getId();
15077|        $activityMeta = $this->parseOccurrenceActivityPayload($row->getActivity());
15078|        $history = [
15079|            ['date' => $row->getCreatedAt()->format('d/m/Y'), 'label' => 'Ocorrência registrada'],
15080|        ];
15081|        if (in_array($row->getStatus(), ['resolvida', 'finalizada'], true)) {
15082|            $history[] = ['date' => $row->getUpdatedAt()->format('d/m/Y'), 'label' => 'Ocorrência finalizada'];
15083|        }
15084|
15085|        return [
15086|            'id'              => $row->getId(),
15087|            'list_row_key'    => (string) $row->getId(),
15088|            'is_ssma_event'   => false,
15089|            'title'           => $row->getTitle(),
15090|            'type_value'      => $row->getType(),
15091|            'nature_value'    => $row->getNature() ?? '',
15092|            'severity_value'  => SsmaOccurrenceDashboardAggregator::normalizeSeveritySlug((string) ($row->getSeverity() ?? '')),
15093|            'status_value'    => $row->getStatus(),
15094|            'workflow_status' => SsmaOccurrenceDashboardAggregator::workflowBucketFromLegacyStatus((string) $row->getStatus()),
15095|            'date'            => $row->getDate()->format('Y-m-d'),
15096|            'created_at'      => $row->getCreatedAt()->format('Y-m-d'),
15097|            'updated_at'      => $row->getUpdatedAt()->format('Y-m-d'),
15098|            'manager_id'      => $managerId,
15099|            'team_id'         => $teamId,
15100|            'people_ids'      => $row->getPeopleIds(),
15101|            'location_value'  => $row->getLocation() ?? '',
15102|            'description'     => trim($activityMeta['text'] ?? ''),
15103|            'activity'        => $activityMeta['text'],
15104|            'approach_value'  => $row->getApproach() ?? '',
15105|            'responsible_ids' => $row->getResponsibleIds(),
15106|            'area'            => $teamsById[$teamId]['name'] ?? '',
15107|            'evidences'       => $activityMeta['evidences'],
15108|            'history'         => $history,
15109|            'person_id'       => null,
15110|            'person_type'     => '',
15111|        ];
15112|    }
15113|
15114|    /**
15115|     * @param list<SsmaAction> $rows
15116|     *
15117|     * @return list<array<string, mixed>>
15118|     */
15119|    private function mapSsmaActionEntitiesToListArrays(array $rows, Company $company, ?User $user): array
15120|    {
Request #31 deepseek-v4-flash P:126.99K C:4.3K CR:126.08K CW:0 31183ms
Reasoning
Legacy occurrence rows don't set created_by_id at all (not in array) so enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback: createdByUserId = 0 → created_by_member_id stays blank, manager_id untouched (unless blank and createdByMemberId<=0 skip). So legacy rows unaffected. Good; no wrong mapping. Wait, but for legacy rows, is created_by_id present elsewhere from SQL path? mapSsmaOccurrenceEntityToListRow doesn't include it; template uses occurrence.created_by_id|default(null) → null → created_by_lookup null → created_by blank; "Responsável pelo cadastro" block for legacy occurrence (kind occurrence): display shows '—' unless reported_by_member (manager) matched. So legacy occurrence now shows a new block "Responsável pelo cadastro —" even for legacy rows? In the new template, the top block renders for ALL occurrences (ROS and non-ROS, event and legacy). For a legacy occurrence without created_by info, it shows '—' with a new header "Responsável pelo cadastro", plus the "Gestor responsável" below. Previously, for legacy (non-ROS) occurrences, there was only "Gestor responsável" section. Now a new "Responsável pelo cadastro" block with an em dash appears for every legacy occurrence (since created_by_member null and reported_by_member = manager_member; if manager member exists, then the fallback `reported_by_member = manager_member` → they display the manager avatar in the "Responsável pelo cadastro" section!). Wait: for legacy occurrences, if manager_member is found, reported_by_member = manager_member (line 529), so the new "Responsável pelo cadastro" section would show the *manager* avatar — mislabeling the manager as the person who registered the occurrence. That's actually a display bug for legacy occurrences where creator is unknown: the first block displays the manager avatar (via fallback `reported_by_member ?: manager_member`), mislabeled as "Responsável pelo cadastro" while the second block also displays the same manager under "Gestor responsável". Also for events whose creator could not be resolved, same issue. So the fallback at line 529 was intended to show the reporter under ROS heading originally. Now it's mislabeled under "Responsável pelo cadastro". This could produce misleading information in the view. It's a UI-correctness issue (medium/low). Worth a low/medium comment. It's a genuine mismatch introduced in this diff: In the template top block "Responsável pelo cadastro", using `reported_by_member` as fallback when `created_by_member` is missing shows the *gestor responsável* (not the creator). The old heading under which this fallback was used ("Relatado por") conceptually matched manager when creator was the manager. But with new distinct block semantics (creator = who registered), showing manager is wrong. I'll add this as a low/medium comment anchored at line 529 or the new "Responsável pelo cadastro" block. Anchor to new lines 935-943: ``` {% elseif reported_by_member %} {% include 'components/ui/_member_avatars_stack.html.twig' with { members: [reported_by_member|merge({'avatar': null, 'email': null})], max_visible: 1, size: 28 } %} ``` This is within the added block. Good. Now severity: low. Wait but for legacy occurrences, is the 'Responsável pelo cadastro' even relevant? There is no creator data, so better show '—'. Using manager as fallback mislabels. Yes. Let me now craft the final set of comments. Order the code_comment calls. I will produce: 1. Validation manager rule (medium) - file SsmaController at lines 10427-10435. 2. Area scope not enforced on server (medium/security) - file SsmaController lines 12320-12327. 3. Perf N+1 (low) - SsmaController line 15590. 4. Test file: tautological assertions + no functional coverage (low, category test). 5. Twig fallback mislabel "Responsável pelo cadastro" shows gestor when creator unknown (low). Let me write the comments in pt-BR, concise. Double-check snippet anchors exist in the diff as added lines exactly. For template comment, the added lines inside `{% elseif reported_by_member %}`... The diff added the whole new block. Yes lines 935-940 match added lines. For test file lines 88-89 (the last two ok). Those are added lines in the new file. The content: `ok('Evento some para o criador se só olhar manager_id (regressão)', 99 !== 10);` and `ok('Criador volta a ver se created_by_member_id == ele', 10 === 10);` Good. Let me carefully check exact line content in test file to match snippets (from diff at end): ``` +ok('Evento some para o criador se só olhar manager_id (regressão)', 99 !== 10); +ok('Criador volta a ver se created_by_member_id == ele', 10 === 10); ``` Yes. Now, be careful about comment #1 (manager rule) — Is my claim about supervisor blocked create verified by code? For scoped user: manager must be set. apply default to ownLeader if exists; else empty → 403. Yes, given scope exists. Also mention if the user is a Gestor with scope and they can select a leader... For a Gestor de Equipe (canSelect) with no superior, options list includes all leaders in their team scope (scope ids), so they could select another leader; not blocked. So block applies to supervisors and members with team scope (non canSelect). But plain members have null scope (not team-scoped), so they aren't blocked. Wait, do plain members ever have team scope? Only if they have a tag with team limitation/role (supervisor/gestor). So block applies to Supervisor de Equipe/legacy role-based SSMA viewers with team ids. These users register occurrences too after the bug #1 fix (supervisor can register own occurrence). If they lack a superior, blocked. It's medium. For legacy edit block: it applies when editing an existing event by a scoped user (could be same supervisor or team gestor) where the manager isn't currently a leader immediate nor own leader. Because the manager_id ≤ 0 check is pre-existing, the new break is when manager exists but fails the new condition. Suggest preserving existing manager in edit mode if unchanged. But note the "existing manager" preservation in apply already occurs. The validation still rejects. So in the comment, mention "edição de ocorrências legadas" - and that if manager==existing, bypass leader check. I need to be careful that in the validation function we don't know whether it's create or update; the update is the caller; the function doesn't have existing details. So suggest: pass flag for edit and skip leader requirement when manager equals stored value; or the create path fallback. Good. Let me now also double check severity categories supported: bug, security, performance, maintainability, test, style, documentation, other. Choose: 1. bug (medium) 2. security (medium) 3. performance (low) 4. test (low) 5. bug (low) Wait #2 might be "security" because crafted request; but it's more an authorization boundary/isolamento; choose security. Write code_comment with all. Let me craft the contents, mindful of the required format in the test file rules (not needed for controller comments; user rules for SsmaController says focus etc). But the general "comment format" instruction belongs to the standalone test file review rules. Nevertheless, write clear Portuguese with simple first sentence. Comments: 1. Controller (validate function) — path src/Controller/SsmaController.php snippet: ``` $leaderIds = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company); $ownLeaderId = $this->resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId($company, $user); $managerAllowed = isset($leaderIds[$managerId]) && isset($allowedMembers[$managerId]); if ($ownLeaderId !== null && $ownLeaderId === $managerId) { $managerAllowed = true; } ``` Category bug, severity medium. 2. Controller apply assignment area gap — snippet: ``` $allowed = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company); $scope = $this->getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds($company, $user); if ($scope !== null) { $teamMembers = $scope === [] ? [] : $this->collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams($company, $scope); $allowed = array_intersect_key($allowed, $teamMembers); } ``` Category security, severity medium. 3. mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow resolve — snippet: ``` 'created_by_member_id' => $this->resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId($e->getCompany(), $e->getCreatedById()), ``` Category performance, severity low. 4. Test file assertions — snippet: ``` ok('Evento some para o criador se só olhar manager_id (regressão)', 99 !== 10); ok('Criador volta a ver se created_by_member_id == ele', 10 === 10); ``` Category test, severity low. 5. Twig — snippet: ``` {% elseif reported_by_member %} {% include 'components/ui/_member_avatars_stack.html.twig' with { members: [reported_by_member|merge({'avatar': null, 'email': null})], max_visible: 1, size: 28 } %} ``` Category bug severity low. Let me verify these anchors exactly appear in diff added lines with the same leading spaces. For twig, the diff added lines include `+ {% elseif reported_by_member %}` etc. Yes. Suggestion code for each is optional; the format uses fields content, existing_code, category, severity, path; suggestion_code optional. I'll leave out suggestions except maybe for #4 none, #5 none. #1 maybe not; #2 none. Provide path. Actually comment tool supports suggestion_code optional. I'll supply without it. Let me write final content in pt-BR. One more: make sure comment 1 and 2 code snippets are in "added lines" only. Yes. Also ensure I "reviewed every file": SsmaController, occurrence_view twig, _modal_event twig, test file. I'll include a brief summary before tool call and after comments call task_done. Actually, wait: Do I need to double-check _modal_event twig has no other issues to comment on? The disabled select with `required` for non-canChange: browsers skip validation of disabled controls; for user with canChange false, the default manager is set by JS. If defaultManagerId missing (no leader) for scoped supervisor, then no manager → block (covered in comment 1 server side). Good. One more thing to verify in the modal: line 241 has `<select ... {% if gestoresList|length > 0 %}required{% endif %}{% if not ssmaCanChangeEventManager|default(false) %} disabled{% endif %}>`. For a plain member without leader, gestoresList may be empty → not required → not disabled? no disabled only by canChange false; it's disabled regardless. Since disabled empty manager => server-side member scope null no validation → save okay. Actually wait — plain member scenario: validation skipped server-side because scope null? A plain member gets scope null if they're not viewer/supervisor. Let's re-verify getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds returns null for plain members. Yes: member tag 'Membro', no team limitation, not SSMA viewer role? For 'Supervisor' puro returns null (global). Wait 'Supervisor' puro without team scope: line 10266 returns null if tag is Gestor Administrador or 'Supervisor'. And for a supervisor with team? They'd have 'Supervisor de Equipe'. But hold on: isSsmaViewer() returns true if user has SSMA viewer role or tag supervisor? The getSsmaViewerTeamIds() would return team ids for ROLE-based supervisors? For a supervisor de equipe with the tag, parsed team ids non-empty. Fine. Now plain members: registration types matrix; validation manager skipped. Their ROS/Event with manager = their superior or empty if none. Fine. Now let me also double-check the elseif in the modal (that when not canChange but existing event has manager different from own leader in edit modal for a member editing an event that was created by someone else (e.g., supervisor editing team member's event)? applySsmaEventManagerAssignment keeps existing manager for non-canSelect editors. But can non-canSelect editors even edit others' events? canEditSsmaEvent likely false. So not relevant. OK. I'll finalize the comments. Let me also consider if comments overlap too much with each other in the same lines region (validation vs apply). They don't overlap; apply is at 12320, validation at 10427. Both different lines. Write now.
Tool Calls (1)
code_comment
Show Details
{"comments": [{"content": "A nova regra exige que o gestor seja 'líder imediato' de alguém no escopo (ou o próprio superior de quem salva), e o front trava o campo para quem não é gestor. Quando o cadastro do usuário não tem 'Responsável' (superior) preenchido — estruturas sem hierarquia configurada — um Supervisor de Equipe (escopo de equipe, sem poder trocar o campo) fica sem gestor default e toda tentativa de salvar é recusada com 403 'Informe o gestor responsável.', sem nenhum fallback. Além disso, ocorrências antigas gravadas com manager_id que não é 'líder imediato' (ex.: ROS onde o relator era o próprio colaborador) passam a falhar na edição mesmo com o campo inalterado. Recomendo: na edição, quando o manager_id enviado é igual ao já gravado, preservar sem exigir a regra de líder; e na criação, quando não há superior cadastrado, não bloquear (deixar gravar sem gestor para o fallback de exibição ou permitir escolher outro líder do escopo).", "existing_code": "        $leaderIds = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company);\n        $ownLeaderId = $this->resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId($company, $user);\n        $managerAllowed = isset($leaderIds[$managerId]) && isset($allowedMembers[$managerId]);\n        if ($ownLeaderId !== null && $ownLeaderId === $managerId) {\n            $managerAllowed = true;\n        }", "category": "bug", "severity": "medium", "path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php"}, {"content": "O seletor do modal limita o 'Gestor responsável' ao escopo de equipe E área (o código da view cruza managerScopeIds com allowedMemberIds da área), mas a atribuição no servidor (applySsmaEventManagerAssignment) e a validação validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope usam apenas getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds. Para um Gestor de Área com área restrita e sem equipe esse filtro devolve null e o servidor aceita qualquer líder da empresa inteira como gestor, mesmo fora da área dele — o recorte aplicado na interface vira cosmético e uma request manipulada cruza o isolamento por área. Alinhe a atribuição/validação com o mesmo getSsmaPreventionAreaScope usado para montar as opções.", "existing_code": "        $allowed = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company);\n        $scope = $this->getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds($company, $user);\n        if ($scope !== null) {\n            $teamMembers = $scope === []\n                ? []\n                : $this->collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams($company, $scope);\n            $allowed = array_intersect_key($allowed, $teamMembers);\n        }", "category": "security", "severity": "medium", "path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php"}, {"content": "Esse resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId roda dentro de mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow, que percorre todos os eventos da empresa em loadOccurrences (listagem do dashboard, centenas de linhas). Cada criador distinto dispara um findBy novo (o cache só evita repetição do mesmo par empresa/usuário dentro da request). Considere resolver os member_ids de todos os criadores em uma única consulta (WHERE user IN (...)) ou já trazer o created_by_member_id no SQL da listagem, para evitar N+1 a cada render.", "existing_code": "            'created_by_member_id'   => $this->resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId($e->getCompany(), $e->getCreatedById()),", "category": "performance", "severity": "low", "path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php"}, {"content": "Essas duas últimas asserções são tautologias (99 !== 10 e 10 === 10) — não executam buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions nem applySsmaEventManagerAssignment. Todo o arquivo apenas duplica a lógica das funções em helpers locais e não passa pelos endpoints reais de criação/edição de evento nem por validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope. Como a PR mexe em regra de permissão (quem pode trocar o gestor / quem pode validar), o teste deveria cobrir o fluxo funcional/integração para pegar regressões de autorização como as descritas acima.", "existing_code": "ok('Evento some para o criador se só olhar manager_id (regressão)', 99 !== 10);\nok('Criador volta a ver se created_by_member_id == ele', 10 === 10);", "category": "test", "severity": "low", "path": "tests/Ssma/ssma_event_manager_leader_rule_standalone.php"}, {"content": "Nesta seção 'Responsável pelo cadastro', quando o criador não é resolvido (created_by_member nulo — ex.: ocorrências legadas sem created_by_id ou criador desligado), o fallback exibe reported_by_member, que é o gestor responsável (linha 529). Ou seja, o nome/avatar do gestor aparece rotulado como 'quem cadastrou', duplicando a informação da seção seguinte e rotulando incorretamente a autoria. Para ocorrências sem dado de criador o correto é exibir '—', não cair no gestor.", "existing_code": "                    {% elseif reported_by_member %}\n                        {% include 'components/ui/_member_avatars_stack.html.twig' with {\n                            members: [reported_by_member|merge({'avatar': null, 'email': null})],\n                            max_visible: 1,\n                            size: 28\n                        } %}", "category": "bug", "severity": "low", "path": "templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig"}]}
(async)
Request #32 deepseek-v4-flash P:33.99K C:228 CR:28.67K CW:0 2594ms
Reasoning
Let me verify my comments are accurate and reasonably placed. Let me double check the validation method lines around 10420-10437 to confirm context, and confirm existing manager preservation in edit path doesn't happen at validation time. Actually let me check callers of validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope to see if my claim that editing existing events passes through is right and whether existing manager already allowed. Let me search.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope", "file_patterns": ["src/Controller/SsmaController.php"]}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 3
10384|    private function validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope(array $data, Company $company, User $user): ?string
26489|        $teamScopeErr = $this->validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope($data, $company, $user);
26718|        $teamScopeErr = $this->validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope($data, $company, $user);

code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions", "file_patterns": ["src/Controller/SsmaController.php"]}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 2
12248|    private function buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions(
13218|            ? $this->buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions(

Request #33 deepseek-v4-flash P:34.39K C:201 CR:34.18K CW:0 1744ms
Reasoning
Let me read the create and edit callers (26480-26500 and 26710-26730) to verify existing manager preservation and whether the validation on edit can break legacy data.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 26470, "end_line": 26510}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 26470-26510
26470|        $typeKey = strtoupper(trim((string) ($data['type'] ?? '')));
26471|        if ($typeKey !== '' && !$this->canCreateSsmaOccurrenceType($typeKey)) {
26472|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Você não tem permissão para registrar ocorrências deste tipo.'], 403);
26473|        }
26474|
26475|        $eventDetails = is_array($data['details'] ?? null) ? $data['details'] : [];
26476|        if (
26477|            in_array($typeKey, ['ROS', 'QUASE_ACIDENTE', 'ACIDENTE_PESSOAL', 'ACIDENTE_MATERIAL', 'ACIDENTE_AMBIENTAL'], true)
26478|            && !$this->canAccessSsmaEventAprofundamento(
26479|                $company,
26480|                $user,
26481|                $typeKey,
26482|                $eventDetails,
26483|                (int) ($user->getId() ?? 0)
26484|            )
26485|        ) {
26486|            $data = $this->stripSsmaEventAprofundamentoFieldsFromPayload($data, $typeKey, []);
26487|        }
26488|
26489|        $teamScopeErr = $this->validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope($data, $company, $user);
26490|        if ($teamScopeErr !== null) {
26491|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => $teamScopeErr], 403);
26492|        }
26493|
26494|        try {
26495|            $service  = new \App\Service\Ssma\SsmaEventService($this->entityManager, $this->ssmaOccurrenceTypeConfig);
26496|            $payloads = $service->splitPersonalAccidentPayloads($data);
26497|            $editorMeta = $this->resolveSsmaEditorMeta($company, $user);
26498|            $registeredByName = trim(($user->getFirstName() ?? '') . ' ' . ($user->getLastName() ?? ''));
26499|            if ($registeredByName === '') {
26500|                $registeredByName = $user->getEmail() ?? 'Sistema';
26501|            }
26502|
26503|            foreach ($payloads as $payload) {
26504|                $payloadErrors = $validator->validate($payload, [
26505|                    'allowed_type_keys' => $this->ssmaOccurrenceTypeConfig->getAllowedTypeKeys($company),
26506|                ]);
26507|                if ($payloadErrors !== []) {
26508|                    return new JsonResponse([
26509|                        'success' => false,
26510|                        'message' => implode(' ', $payloadErrors),
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 26700, "end_line": 26740}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 26700-26740
26700|                $detailsOut['aprofundamento_complete'] = false;
26701|                $detailsOut['aprofundamento_status'] = 'draft';
26702|            }
26703|            $data['details'] = $detailsOut;
26704|        }
26705|
26706|        // Valida apenas se type ou details estiverem presentes no payload (atualização parcial ok)
26707|        if (!empty($data['type']) || !empty($data['details'])) {
26708|            $validator = new \App\Service\Ssma\SsmaEventValidator();
26709|            $errors    = $validator->validate($data, [
26710|                'allowed_type_keys' => $this->ssmaOccurrenceTypeConfig->getAllowedTypeKeys($company),
26711|                'soft_aprofundamento' => $aprofundamentoOnly && !$wantsFinalize,
26712|            ]);
26713|            if ($errors !== []) {
26714|                return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'errors' => $errors], 422);
26715|            }
26716|        }
26717|
26718|        $teamScopeErr = $this->validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope($data, $company, $user);
26719|        if ($teamScopeErr !== null) {
26720|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => $teamScopeErr], 403);
26721|        }
26722|
26723|        $service = new \App\Service\Ssma\SsmaEventService($this->entityManager, $this->ssmaOccurrenceTypeConfig);
26724|        $prevType         = $event->getType();
26725|        $prevStatus       = $event->getStatus();
26726|        $prevImmediateRisk = !empty($event->getDetails()['immediate_risk']);
26727|        $prevManagerId = (int) ($event->getDetails()['manager_id'] ?? 0);
26728|        $wasRejectedApproval = $this->ssmaOccurrenceApprovalService->getState($event)['status']
26729|            === \App\Service\Ssma\SsmaOccurrenceApprovalService::STATUS_REJECTED;
26730|        $editorMeta = $this->resolveSsmaEditorMeta($company, $user);
26731|        $event      = $service->updateFromPayload($event, $data, $user, $editorMeta);
26732|
26733|        if ($wasRejectedApproval) {
26734|            // Readequação: reenvia tanto na edição completa quanto ao finalizar só o aprofundamento.
26735|            $this->maybeSubmitOccurrenceForValidation($event, $company, $user, true);
26736|        } elseif ($wantsFinalize) {
26737|            $this->maybeSubmitOccurrenceForValidation($event, $company, $user, false);
26738|        }
26739|
26740|        $registeredByName = trim(($user->getFirstName() ?? '') . ' ' . ($user->getLastName() ?? ''));
Request #34 deepseek-v4-flash P:36.02K C:1.08K CR:34.56K CW:0 9643ms
Reasoning
Both create and edit call validate. Edit path: applySsmaEventManagerAssignment runs earlier (before validate) with existingDetails. If a non-canSelect user editing and existingManagerId>0 keeps it. Validation: existingManagerId kept → managerAllowed checks leaders + allowedMembers, and ownLeader. If the stored manager isn't a leader in scope (legacy), validation fails even though unchanged → issue #1's claim holds for edit (legacy events where manager was relator, member without superior). Wait: Actually for edit, is applySsmaEventManagerAssignment applied before validate? Let me check the edit function flow; the diff shows the apply replaced forceSsmaRosReporterForPlainMember at line ~26662 in edit. And validate at 26718. So apply runs before validate. apply for non-canSelect users preserving existing manager. For legacy event edited by its owner (plain member with null scope → getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds null → allowed = leaders only...). Hmm wait, in apply's branch: only if scope null and canSelect. For non-canSelect: ownLeader preserved or existing. Then validate: allowedMembers from picker scope (null) → managerAllowed requires leader. So if the plain member's ownLeader null and legacy event's manager is, e.g., some gestor who isn't an immediate leader... Actually legacy ROS stored manager = self (relator) typically, per old comment: "ROS — manager_id = the member who registered". A self member who isn't a leader himself (no subordinates) — member has no subordinates → not in leaderIds. If the creator also has a superior and manager==ownLeader? Old behavior: ROS forceSsmaRosReporterForPlainMember set manager_id = the member himself. A plain member isn't a leader (has no direct reports necessarily) → would fail validation under new rule on edit unless manager==ownLeader (it's not: manager=himself). So editing a legacy ROS by plain member would now fail with 403? Unless scope... Actually validation requires isset($leaderIds[$managerId]) && isset($allowedMembers[$managerId]). allowedMembers null for plain member. So need leaderIds[managerId]. The legacy ROS stored own member id, who isn't leader (has no report). Then fails. And ownLeaderId differs → no exemption. Wait — this is the same issue as #1. Good. Also, importantly, update path also runs normalize + apply... but if plain member has no superior, ownLeader null, so their manager would be overwritten? On edit non-canSelect with existingManagerId>0, apply keeps existingManagerId (existing manager). So the manager remains the legacy self ID, then validation fails. Confirms #1 has a real edit-blocking scenario for legacy data. Hmm, wait: but was manager_id previously stored on legacy ROS as the relator member? forceSsmaRosReporterForPlainMember set manager_id = memberId on create for plain member. But new apply for plain member sets manager_id = ownLeaderId (superior). On edit of a plain member's legacy ROS, existingManagerId>0 and non-canSelect → keeps legacy member's own id. Validation then requires leaderIds. If member has no direct reports, it fails. Yes, real regression for editing legacy records. However there's subtlety: after create with new rule plain member store manager_id = superior if superior exists. That's fine. I think comment #1 is accurate. Let me refine it perhaps, but it's already reported. Good enough. Now check getSsmaPreventionAreaScope usage for issue #2? I referenced getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds returns null for Gestor de Área restricted. Let me verify getSsmaPreventionAreaScope is applied in build (view) for options (in view code at lines 13205: occurrenceAreaFilterIds) but not in applySsmaEventManagerAssignment. Indeed apply only uses team filter. So a Gestor de Área could choose outside area via manipulated request. But note: canSelectSsmaEventResponsibleManager returns true if tag 'Gestor de Área'. So yes, they can select and scope is only team based in server; if no team scope, all leaders allowed. Report stands. Now is there an additional scenario: the server-side validation in validate function uses allowedMembers (picker scope including area). So the validation at save does apply area intersection? Let me check where allowedMembers passed into validate function comes from; earlier read shows it was loaded at the top with allowedMemberMap when !$forGestorModal... Wait, the validation function signature takes $allowedMembers. Let me re-read the function beginning at ~10384 for scope of $allowedMembers.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 10370, "end_line": 10445}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 10370-10445
10370|            foreach (array_map('trim', explode(',', $raw)) as $t) {
10371|                if ($t !== '' && in_array((string) $t, $teamIdStr, true)) {
10372|                    $set[(int) $m->getId()] = true;
10373|                    break;
10374|                }
10375|            }
10376|        }
10377|
10378|        return $set;
10379|    }
10380|
10381|    /**
10382|     * @param array<string, mixed> $data Payload já normalizado ({@see normalizeSsmaEventPayload}).
10383|     */
10384|    private function validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope(array $data, Company $company, User $user): ?string
10385|    {
10386|        $scope = $this->getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds($company, $user);
10387|        if ($scope === null) {
10388|            return null;
10389|        }
10390|
10391|        $details = $data['details'] ?? [];
10392|        if (!is_array($details)) {
10393|            $details = [];
10394|        }
10395|
10396|        if ($scope === []) {
10397|            // Técnico especialista SSMA (sem equipe no produto): não valida payload por equipe.
10398|            // O acesso ao evento já ?? validado por isSsmaEventVisibleUnderOccurrenceTeamDashboardScope
10399|            // e canCompleteSsmaTechnicalType antes dessa chamada, garantindo que só acessa seu tipo.
10400|            try {
10401|                $member = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
10402|                if ($member) {
10403|                    $techLinks = $this->entityManager
10404|                        ->getRepository(SsmaPermissionTagMember::class)
10405|                        ->findBy(['companyMember' => $member]);
10406|                    if (!empty($techLinks)) {
10407|                        return null;
10408|                    }
10409|                }
10410|            } catch (\Throwable) {
10411|            }
10412|
10413|            return 'Seu perfil não está vinculado a nenhuma equipe; não ? possível registrar ocorrências.';
10414|        }
10415|
10416|        $teamId = (int) ($details['team_id'] ?? 0);
10417|        if ($teamId <= 0 || !in_array($teamId, $scope, true)) {
10418|            return 'A equipe informada não está disponível para o seu perfil.';
10419|        }
10420|
10421|        $allowedMembers = $this->collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams($company, $scope);
10422|
10423|        $managerId = (int) ($details['manager_id'] ?? 0);
10424|        if ($managerId <= 0) {
10425|            return 'Informe o gestor responsável.';
10426|        }
10427|        $leaderIds = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company);
10428|        $ownLeaderId = $this->resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId($company, $user);
10429|        $managerAllowed = isset($leaderIds[$managerId]) && isset($allowedMembers[$managerId]);
10430|        if ($ownLeaderId !== null && $ownLeaderId === $managerId) {
10431|            $managerAllowed = true;
10432|        }
10433|        if (!$managerAllowed) {
10434|            return 'O gestor responsável precisa ser líder imediato de alguém e pertencer ao seu escopo de equipe/área.';
10435|        }
10436|
10437|        return null;
10438|    }
10439|
10440|    /**
10441|     * team_limitation na inspeção: a equipe é o recorte. Sem equipe, ou equipe fora do cadastro
10442|     * do perfil, a gravação é recusada. area_limitation sozinha não passa por aqui.
10443|     *
10444|     * @param array<string, mixed> $data
10445|     */
Request #35 deepseek-v4-flash P:38.1K C:163 CR:36.99K CW:0 2078ms
Reasoning
Now important: the whole validation function only applies when getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds($company,$user) !== null and !== []. For Gestor de Área (area restriction only, no team), scope = ? getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds likely null for area-gestors? Let's confirm what that function returns. Let me read its body.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/SsmaController.php"], "search_text": "private function getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
10249|    private function getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds(?Company $company, ?User $user): ?array

Request #36 deepseek-v4-flash P:38.33K C:88 CR:38.14K CW:0 1389ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 10249, "end_line": 10340}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 10249-10340
10249|    private function getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds(?Company $company, ?User $user): ?array
10250|    {
10251|        if (!$company || !$user instanceof User) {
10252|            return null;
10253|        }
10254|
10255|        if ($this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN') || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER')) {
10256|            return null;
10257|        }
10258|
10259|        $member = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
10260|        if (!$member) {
10261|            return null;
10262|        }
10263|
10264|        $tag = $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($member);
10265|        // 'Supervisor' puro (sem "de Equipe") ?? supervisor global: sem restrição de equipe, igual ao Gestor Administrador.
10266|        if ($tag && in_array($tag->getName(), ['Gestor Administrador', 'Supervisor'], true)) {
10267|            return null;
10268|        }
10269|
10270|        $parsed = $this->parseCompanyMemberTeamIds($member);
10271|
10272|        if ($tag && in_array($tag->getName(), $this->ssmaTeamScopePermissionTagNames(), true)) {
10273|            return $parsed;
10274|        }
10275|
10276|        if ($tag && $tag->getTeamLimitation()) {
10277|            return $parsed;
10278|        }
10279|
10280|        $viewerTeams = $this->getSsmaViewerTeamIds();
10281|        if ($viewerTeams !== null) {
10282|            return $viewerTeams;
10283|        }
10284|
10285|        // Membro sem tag de supervisão/gestão SSMA (ex.: stakeholder via ocorrência) não deve
10286|        // ter filtro de equipe aplicado: retorna null para que filterOccurrencesForMember
10287|        // mostre apenas o conteúdo próprio. Retornar [] zeraria todos os dados antes disso.
10288|        if ($tag !== null && $parsed === []) {
10289|            if ($this->resolveCurrentUserTechnicalTypes($company, $user) !== []) {
10290|                return [];
10291|            }
10292|
10293|            return null;
10294|        }
10295|
10296|        return null;
10297|    }
10298|
10299|    /**
10300|     * Recorte de área do usuário logado na Prevenção Ativa.
10301|     *
10302|     * Fonte única para listagem, busca, detalhe e gravação: um escopo não restrito libera tudo,
10303|     * um escopo restrito com conjunto vazio nega tudo. Não existe estado intermediário em que
10304|     * a ausência de área cadastrada remova o filtro.
10305|     */
10306|    private function getSsmaPreventionAreaScope(?Company $company, ?User $user): SsmaPreventionAreaScope
10307|    {
10308|        if (!$company || !$user instanceof User) {
10309|            return SsmaPreventionAreaScope::unrestricted();
10310|        }
10311|
10312|        $isPlatformAdmin = $this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN') || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER');
10313|        $member = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
10314|        $tag = $member ? $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($member, 'ssma-prevention') : null;
10315|
10316|        return $this->ssmaPreventionAreaAuthorization
10317|            ->resolveScope($company, $member, $tag, $isPlatformAdmin);
10318|    }
10319|
10320|    /**
10321|     * @return list<int>
10322|     */
10323|    private function parseCompanyMemberAreaIds(CompanyMembers $member): array
10324|    {
10325|        return $this->ssmaPreventionAreaAuthorization->memberAreaIds($member);
10326|    }
10327|
10328|    /**
10329|     * Guarda de leitura de inspeção por ID: quem não vê na listagem também não abre pelo ID.
10330|     */
10331|    private function canViewInspectionUnderAreaScope(SsmaInspection $inspection, ?Company $company, ?User $user): bool
10332|    {
10333|        return $this->ssmaPreventionAreaAuthorization->canViewInspection(
10334|            $this->getSsmaPreventionAreaScope($company, $user),
10335|            $inspection
10336|        );
10337|    }
10338|
10339|    /**
10340|     * Guarda de leitura de abordagem por ID: mesmo critério da listagem (observador no recorte).
Request #37 deepseek-v4-flash P:39.61K C:1.42K CR:38.4K CW:0 12440ms
Reasoning
So for a Gestor de Área (tag 'Gestor de Área'), does the function return null or something? Tag Gestor de Área - is in $this->ssmaTeamScopePermissionTagNames()? Not clear. `SsmaAreaLimitationScope::TAG_GESTOR_AREA` = 'Gestor de Área'? Actually in canSelect they used constant TAG_GESTOR_AREA and string 'Gestor de Área'? In code list at canSelect: `SsmaAreaLimitationScope::TAG_GESTOR_AREA` and `'Gestor de Área'`? Let me check: array is ['Gestor de Equipe', SsmaAreaLimitationScope::TAG_GESTOR_AREA, 'Gestor Administrador']. Let me check the constant value. Regardless, the validation function at scope null returns early (no team scope) — meaning Gestor de Área would skip team-scope payload validation (manager validation) if getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds returns null. So for a Gestor de Área, validate won't constrain manager at all. And the UI/build restricts managers by area, but server assignment apply also only checks team scope, and validate early-returns. So a Gestor de Área could save manager outside area via manipulated request. But actually there's a separate area-scope validation in create/edit? Possibly via area scope checks elsewhere. But not necessarily for events manager. My issue #2 comment is reasonably solid. But since validate function returns null when scope null, there's no error path. But the comment about apply assignment as the enforcement point is fine. However, wait: does a Gestor de Área even go through team scope? If tag name 'Gestor de Área' is in ssmaTeamScopePermissionTagNames, they would get team scope = parsed team ids (empty if no teams) → scope === [] → validate path with empty returns... it returns 403 "Seu perfil não está vinculado..." for non-tech. That would mean a Gestor de Área without team couldn't register events at all? But that pre-existed. If scope==[] then blocked from registering — no change. But Gestor de Área likely not in ssmaTeamScopePermissionTagNames and no teamLimitation → tag Gestor de Área? Actually "Gestor de Área" is a prevention product tag. This controller is ssma occurrences product, resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember for occurrences uses the SSMA tag mapping; area might not be included. So likely getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds returns null for them → validate skipped entirely. So server constraint for area on manager_id is absent in the apply assignment too. But hold on: for the whole event register in prevention flow? This is the SSMA occurrence dashboard (events modal). The area scope lines in the diff (occurrenceAreaFilterIds) show that for area-scoped users the picker/modal filters by area. And these are prevention module users reaching SSMA event modal? Probably integrated. Anyway, my comments #1 and #2 might be partly overlapping but #1 focuses on block; #2 focuses on missing area enforcement in assignment (server). They are complementary and distinct. Let me now confirm resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember for a supervisor de equipe. Validation block applies to them. Good enough. My #2 comment references only apply assignment function; but I also cite validation. Actually validate does use team-only allowedMembers (no area). But validate function returns null when team scope null, meaning for area-restricted users without teams no check. For team-scoped users, area restriction also ignored in validation. That is a valid gap too. But keep the comment as-is focusing on apply function (the enforcement in creation/update paths). Fine. Now there is one more possibility: are the events here created through prevention module (Inspections/Approach events) where area scope is enforced elsewhere? Regardless, the specific applySsmaEventManagerAssignment runs on the SSMA event create/edit, using team filter only; in the modal for area-scoped, the manager options were area-filtered (view), but the server enforcement is only team based → asymmetry. That's what we flag. Now let me double check the Twig comment #5's claim: `reported_by_member = created_by_member ?: manager_member`. And the new top block "Responsável pelo cadastro" — first branch uses created_by_member. elseif reported_by_member → shows manager when creator null. Yes. But maybe for legacy occurrences kind=occurrence (not event), is created_by_id present? These events route template occurrence_view for both event and legacy occurrence? Actually view kind=event vs occurrence. The template changes to the same section. For legacy SsmaOccurrence rows, the list-row array lacks created_by fields → creator null → shows manager avatar in "Responsável pelo cadastro". Legacy records would have only the older fields like created_at. Yes, mislabel. Good comment, low severity. Now #3 comment performance about mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow: Wait, the diff snippet line: 'created_by_member_id' => $this->resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId($e->getCompany(), $e->getCreatedById()). But mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow is invoked where? Let's check; but the caching added also in loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite? Actually resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId caches per request. mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow is called from where? Let me check quickly to confirm listing flows (appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser and mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow in normal dashboard load). If the normal dashboard query already maps each event via this function, then N+1 per event creator across the dashboard listing. Could be sizable (hundreds of events). Severity low/medium. It is only when created_by_member_id <=0 and created_by_id>0, we run the lookup (per event where creator isn't set). Most events with same user cached. Distinct creators per company could be many. It's an N+1 but cached per unique pair per request; reasonable to keep low. Given time, keep as low. Let me confirm mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow callers to avoid wrong statement.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/SsmaController.php"], "search_text": "mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 6
12424|            $row = $this->mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow($event, $teamsById);
14912|            $result[] = $this->mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow($event, $teamsById);
15214|                $result[] = $this->mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow($event, $teamsById);
15322|                $evtById[(int) $event->getId()] = $this->mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow($event, $teamsById);
15470|    private function mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow(SsmaEvent $e, array $teamsById): array
16701|            $row = $this->mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow($event, $teamsById);

Request #38 deepseek-v4-flash P:41.24K C:1.43K CR:40.96K CW:0 12192ms
Reasoning
mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow is called in multiple listing paths (14912, 15214, 15322, 16701). So yes, N+1 (per creator distinct) in listing flows. Low severity comment stands. Now let me make sure my comment about validation/blocking for supervisor w/o leader is truly reachable for creation by that user: can they even reach create route? The route guard canCreateSsmaOccurrenceType etc. But the type matrix enables supervisor to create own ROS after bug fix. For a user who has team scope and no superior, applySsmaEventManagerAssignment non-canSelect leaves manager blank → validation at create returns "Informe o gestor responsável." So blocked. Yes. One caveat: Does a user with team scope (e.g., Supervisor de Equipe) actually register events? Earlier read: canCreateSsmaOccurrence now returns true even for supervisor. So yes, they can register their own occurrence. Before this PR, canCreateSsmaOccurrence returned false for supervisors (SSMA viewer), so no issue. Now they can create, and if no superior → block. Note also their ownLeader fallback requires superior; but in many companies supervisors have superiors (their managers). A supervisor at the very top or in a flat company without superior set → block. Edge-case medium. Also note: The regression fix: previously `forceSsmaRosReporterForPlainMember` would set manager_id = self when plain member. New rule sets superior. Plain members (no scope) no validation. OK. Time to finalize. But let me re-examine my comment #1 wording regarding legacy edits: "ocorrências antigas gravadas com manager_id que não é 'líder imediato' ... passam a falhar na edição mesmo com o campo inalterado". Wait: in edit path for a scoped user (supervisor/team gestor) who edited the event previously stored with manager = legacy relator (a member who may not be an immediate leader). Actually on edit apply keeps the existing (unchanged) manager for non-canSelect. Wait, non-canSelect users editing events of others? Probably they can't edit others' events. The plain member whose ROS legacy stored manager=self: plain member has no team scope → validate returns null early → passes. So legacy edit failure only affects users with scope (supervisors) editing events whose manager is not leader in scope. e.g., supervisor de equipe who had previously recorded ROS with manager as one of their team's members (non-leader), because old rule allowed. Now editing fails. How common? Legacy data in the old rule stored manager_id = member relator or gestor. The validation now blocks. So yes real. But is there any requirement that a supervisor is even allowed to edit? Probably events created by them or their team. Fine. I'm confident enough about comment #1 as medium. Also, an alternative reading for #1's claim in the first part: In create, for a scoped user that is actually the team leader themselves (their ownLeader id is in scope), apply sets ownLeader default → manager set → validation passes. If no superior (ownLeader null), manager blank → fail. Yes. My comment says "403 'Informe o gestor responsável.'" Actually manager blank triggers 'Informe o gestor responsável.' 403. If ownLeader is set but ownLeader is outside scope... ownLeader exemption exists. OK. Let me write final summary and mark done. Actually I already wrote comments. I should perhaps re-check whether the code_comment tool requires suggestion_code - no. Now produce concise wrap-up to the user in pt-BR and call task_done. Wait: my previous summary said I'd verify created_by semantics. I did read mapSsmaOccurrenceEntityToListRow: legacy occurrences have no created_by_id → created_by_lookup blank. My Twig comment #5 holds: legacy/unknown → falls back to reported_by_member = manager. Now, should I mention these as separate final message? Let me provide a short summary of reviewed files and issues, then call task_done.
Revisei os 4 arquivos do grupo e registrei os comentários. Resumo dos achados: **src/Controller/SsmaController.php** 1. **[médio]** A nova validação do gestor exige "líder imediato" e trava o campo para não-gestores — Supervisor de Equipe sem `superior` cadastrado fica sem default e é bloqueado na criação (403); registros legados cujo `manager_id` não é líder também passam a falhar na edição mesmo sem alteração. 2. **[médio]** `applySsmaEventManagerAssignment`/validação aplicam apenas o recorte de equipe (`getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds`) e ignoram o recorte de área usado no modal — Gestor de Área pode gravar, via request manipulado, um gestor responsável fora da sua área. 3. **[baixo]** `created_by_member_id` no mapeamento gera consulta por criador distinto (N+1) nas listagens do dashboard. **templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig** 4. **[baixo]** Na nova seção "Responsável pelo cadastro", quando o criador não é resolvido (ocorrências legadas/criador desligado), o fallback exibe o **gestor responsável** rotulado como quem cadastrou — informação duplicada/incorreta. **tests/Ssma/ssma_event_manager_leader_rule_standalone.php** 5. **[baixo]** O teste duplica a lógica em helpers locais e não passa pelos endpoints/validações reais; as duas últimas asserções são tautológicas. Como a PR altera regra de permissão, falta teste de integração. O arquivo `templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig` foi revisado e não apresentou problemas adicionais além dos cobertos pelos comentários de backend (trava/liberação do select e defaults estão coerentes com `applySsmaEventManagerAssignment`). Verifiquei também a semântica de `created_by_id` nas ocorrências legadas (`mapSsmaOccurrenceEntityToListRow` não preenche `created_by_id`), o que confirma o cenário do comentário no template para registros antigos.
Tool Calls (1)
task_done
Show Details
{"state": "DONE"}
Request #39 deepseek-v4-flash P:27.62K C:1.79K CR:20.99K CW:0 13705ms
Reasoning
Let me analyze the code changes carefully. The confirmed findings are already listed; I need to find any other real issues. Let me review each file. 1. src/Controller/SsmaController.php - large changes. 2. templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig 3. templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig 4. tests/Ssma/ssma_event_manager_leader_rule_standalone.php Let me read relevant sections to investigate potential additional issues. Key areas: 1. The new member picker endpoint logic around `$forResponsibleManager` at line ~9139-9160. There's an endpoint that builds allowed member map. Let me read that. 2. `canApproveSsmaOccurrence` - Changed ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR to ROLE_TENANT and removed bypass by `memberIsSsmaGestorAdministrador`. Wait - the change added `ROLE_TENANT` in place of `ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR`, and removed the gestor administrador bypass. Note that a "Gestor Administrador" member previously had bypass; now only if they are listed in approver config. That's intended per bug confirmation. But note - the earlier part of the function checks `$this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN') || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER') || $this->isGranted('ROLE_TENANT')`. Is ROLE_TENANT higher than ROLE_MANAGER? This is a controller-level role. Seems intended. 3. `isSsmaEventVisibleUnderOccurrenceTeamDashboardScope` adds check for creator returning true. But then visibility for created-by events may reveal beyond scope. That's intended (creator sees their own). 4. `canSelectSsmaEventResponsibleManager` - includes ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN, ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_TENANT. Potential issue: The route that uses `collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds` and `resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId` may have company/user not resolved. Let me look at the actual code near 9139. Let me read the file. Let me read around these sections in SsmaController.php. I'll use file_read for sections. Line 9139 onward - `$forResponsibleManager`. This is in some member-picker AJAX action probably. Let me investigate the various methods. Potential issues to verify: A) `$forGestorModal` cap: defaultCap = $forGestorModal ? ($forPicker ? 500 : 100) : 50; then for $forResponsibleManager which may be a manager modal with picker not set, cap=50? Wait, let me read the code after that to see how $defaultCap is used. Actually let me read lines 9100-9250. B) `collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds` - query selects `IDENTITY(cm.superior) AS sid` — when there's no superior (null), DISTINCT IDENTITY(...) null returned; filtered by `> 0`. Also it's a per-request property cache (not keyed by company!). The cache `ssmaImmediateLeaderMemberIdsCache` is keyed only for company? The property cache is per request per controller instance presumably; controller is typically per request in Symfony. So cache is fine because one request = one company context. But wait, could SsmaController service be reused across companies within a single request? Not typical in Symfony (controller instantiated per request). But this controller might be used in a batch context? It's a controller; normally per request. Acceptable. However, `collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds` cache is not keyed by company; but controller handles a single company per request mostly. Possibly OK. C) `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser`: fetches events by company & createdById ordering DESC, maps each via mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow, appends. It checks existing by 'is_ssma_event' flag. It also calls `loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite` again (it says `[, $teams] = $this->loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite($company);`) — this may load full company members again, potentially expensive. But where is this called? In the dashboard listing flow where occurrences were loaded. The function re-queries members/teams. Might be an N+1 / duplication but might be acceptable. Possibly the teams loaded here recompute the full member list. Could be a performance note but already flagged caching issues. D) In the elseif branch at ~13497: only appends when occurrenceTeamFilterIds or occurrenceAreaFilterIds non-null. And earlier branch (when viewing as a manager?) also appends. Fine. E) `enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback` runs in `mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow` and `enrichOccurrenceManagerFields`. In `enrichOccurrenceManagerFields`, if company given, always call `enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback`. This fallback does `resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId` (cached) then `entityManager->find` per occurrence if manager_id <=0 and creator resolved. In loadOccurrences for rows lacking manager_id, it will call find per row → N+1 on DB. Possibly OK given cache only prevents repeated user resolution but `find` per row... manager_id present mostly. F) Let me check `appendSsmaEventModalGestorRow` signature uses (array &$byId, int memberId, array $memberById, Company $company). And buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions uses appendSsmaEventModalGestorRow. Let me read those helper functions to ensure they behave. G) In `buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions`, it adds existing occurrence manager_ids to `keep`. This means any previously stored manager (from old data, e.g., a non-leader manager, e.g., self-reported "Relatado por" = member from the old rule where manager_id = relator member id) is added to options. Hmm: Old forceSsmaRosReporterForPlainMember stored `manager_id = memberId` (the reporter, not a leader). So existing ROS rows have manager_id equal to a plain member. Now the code adds those ids to `keep` so they appear as options. Also enrich fallback fills manager_id with superior when empty. Editing an old ROS event: manager_id = plain member, not a leader. But the new edit path: `applySsmaEventManagerAssignment` (can't select) preserves existingManagerId if > 0. That preserves legacy. That's arguably intended to not break editing old events. However, potential mismatch: the earlier validation `validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope`? We need to check for `managerId` when create of ROS by a member that previously forced manager_id = memberId. Let me search for the validation method to verify consistency. H) A serious potential issue: In the new `$forResponsibleManager` picker endpoint path, when the user is not a manager but they select a responsible manager in modal (they cannot change; field disabled). But this endpoint is also used to build options (remoteExtraParams) - It's remote search endpoint for select2. If member can't change, the select is disabled, so remote never fires. OK. I) Let me look at lines around 9139 to see full context to check `$teamId` may be 0 when responsible manager filter requested... Actually in this endpoint, the logic for `$forResponsibleManager` doesn't use `$teamId`. It returns leader list within scope. Fine. Let me now inspect the actual file in relevant sections. Let me read near 9120-9200.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 9100, "end_line": 9260}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 9100-9260
9100|                fn (SsmaAbordagem $a): bool => $this->ssmaPreventionAreaAuthorization
9101|                    ->canViewAbordagem($areaScope, $a)
9102|            )), 0, $limit);
9103|        }
9104|
9105|        $items = array_map(static function (SsmaAbordagem $a): array {
9106|            return [
9107|                'id'    => $a->getId(),
9108|                'label' => sprintf('Abordagem por %s em %s (#%d) — %s',
9109|                    $a->getObservadorNome(),
9110|                    $a->getLocal(),
9111|                    $a->getId(),
9112|                    $a->getData()->format('d/m/Y')
9113|                ),
9114|            ];
9115|        }, $rows);
9116|
9117|        return new JsonResponse(['success' => true, 'items' => $items, 'total' => count($items)]);
9118|    }
9119|
9120|    /**
9121|     * Busca membros da empresa para combobox SSMA (Fase B — evita SSR com lista completa).
9122|     */
9123|    public function searchSsmaMembers(Request $request): JsonResponse
9124|    {
9125|        /** @var User|null $user */
9126|        $user = $this->getUser();
9127|        if (!$user) {
9128|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Não autenticado.'], 401);
9129|        }
9130|
9131|        $company = $this->getSsmaCompany();
9132|        if (!$company instanceof Company) {
9133|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Empresa não encontrada.'], 400);
9134|        }
9135|
9136|        $q = trim((string) $request->query->get('q', ''));
9137|        $teamId = (int) $request->query->get('team_id', 0);
9138|        // Campo Gestor responsável / executor-validador da ação imediata: escopo da empresa
9139|        // (não filtrar por equipe do supervisor).
9140|        $forGestorModal = filter_var($request->query->get('gestor_modal', false), FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN)
9141|            || filter_var($request->query->get('company_scope', false), FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN);
9142|        $forResponsibleManager = filter_var($request->query->get('responsible_manager', false), FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN);
9143|        // Limite maior para o seletor de comitê (member picker modal) que precisa de todos os membros da empresa.
9144|        $forPicker = filter_var($request->query->get('picker', false), FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN);
9145|        $defaultCap = $forGestorModal ? ($forPicker ? 500 : 100) : 50;
9146|        $limit = min($defaultCap, max(1, (int) $request->query->get('limit', 20)));
9147|
9148|        [$allMembers, $teams] = $this->loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite($company);
9149|
9150|        $allowedMemberMap = null;
9151|        if ($forResponsibleManager) {
9152|            $leaderIds = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company);
9153|            $ownLeaderId = $this->resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId($company, $user);
9154|            $scopeIds = null;
9155|            $occurrenceTeamFilterIds = $this->getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds($company, $user);
9156|            if ($occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== null && $occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== []) {
9157|                $scopeIds = $this->collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams($company, $occurrenceTeamFilterIds);
9158|            }
9159|            $areaScope = $this->getSsmaPreventionAreaScope($company, $user);
9160|            if ($areaScope->isRestricted()) {
9161|                $areaMemberMap = $areaScope->allowedMemberIds();
9162|                $scopeIds = $scopeIds === null
9163|                    ? $areaMemberMap
9164|                    : array_intersect_key($scopeIds, $areaMemberMap);
9165|            }
9166|            $allowedMemberMap = $scopeIds === null
9167|                ? $leaderIds
9168|                : array_intersect_key($leaderIds, $scopeIds);
9169|            if ($ownLeaderId !== null && $ownLeaderId > 0) {
9170|                $allowedMemberMap[$ownLeaderId] = true;
9171|            }
9172|        } elseif (!$forGestorModal) {
9173|            $occurrenceTeamFilterIds = $this->getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds($company, $user);
9174|            if ($teamId > 0) {
9175|                $allowedMemberMap = $this->collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams($company, [$teamId]);
9176|            } elseif ($occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== null && $occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== []) {
9177|                $allowedMemberMap = $this->collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams($company, $occurrenceTeamFilterIds);
9178|            }
9179|
9180|            // Recorte de área ativo sempre restringe, inclusive quando o membro não tem área
9181|            // cadastrada (conjunto vazio = nega tudo). Sem esse cuidado a busca devolveria a
9182|            // empresa inteira justamente no caso em que a tela já não mostra nada.
9183|            $areaScope = $this->getSsmaPreventionAreaScope($company, $user);
9184|            if ($areaScope->isRestricted()) {
9185|                $areaMemberMap = $areaScope->allowedMemberIds();
9186|                $allowedMemberMap = $allowedMemberMap === null
9187|                    ? $areaMemberMap
9188|                    : array_intersect_key($allowedMemberMap, $areaMemberMap);
9189|            }
9190|        }
9191|
9192|        $qNorm = $this->normalizeSsmaMemberSearchText($q);
9193|        $items = [];
9194|        foreach ($allMembers as $row) {
9195|            $id = (int) ($row['id'] ?? 0);
9196|            if ($id <= 0) {
9197|                continue;
9198|            }
9199|            if ($allowedMemberMap !== null && !isset($allowedMemberMap[$id])) {
9200|                continue;
9201|            }
9202|            $name = trim((string) ($row['name'] ?? ''));
9203|            if ($name === '') {
9204|                continue;
9205|            }
9206|            if ($qNorm !== '' && !str_contains($this->normalizeSsmaMemberSearchText($name), $qNorm)
9207|                && !str_contains($this->normalizeSsmaMemberSearchText((string) ($row['email'] ?? '')), $qNorm)
9208|            ) {
9209|                continue;
9210|            }
9211|            $items[] = [
9212|                'id' => $id,
9213|                'name' => $name,
9214|                'email' => (string) ($row['email'] ?? ''),
9215|                'avatar' => $row['avatar'] ?? null,
9216|                'position' => (string) ($row['position'] ?? ''),
9217|            ];
9218|        }
9219|
9220|        usort($items, static function (array $a, array $b): int {
9221|            return strcasecmp((string) $a['name'], (string) $b['name']);
9222|        });
9223|        $items = array_slice($items, 0, $limit);
9224|
9225|        return new JsonResponse([
9226|            'success' => true,
9227|            'items' => $items,
9228|            'total' => count($items),
9229|            'q' => $q,
9230|        ]);
9231|    }
9232|
9233|    public function deleteAction(int $id): JsonResponse
9234|    {
9235|        /** @var User|null $user */
9236|        $user = $this->getUser();
9237|        if (!$user) {
9238|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Não autenticado.'], 401);
9239|        }
9240|
9241|        if (!$this->canManageSsmaOccurrences()) {
9242|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Sem permissão para deletar ações.'], 403);
9243|        }
9244|
9245|        $action = $this->entityManager->find(SsmaAction::class, $id);
9246|        if (!$action || $action->getCompany()->getId() !== $user->getCompany()?->getId()) {
9247|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Ação não encontrada.'], 404);
9248|        }
9249|
9250|        try {
9251|            $this->entityManager->remove($action);
9252|            $this->entityManager->flush();
9253|
9254|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => true, 'message' => 'Ação deletada com sucesso.']);
9255|        } catch (\Throwable $e) {
9256|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Erro ao deletar ação.'], 500);
9257|        }
9258|    }
9259|
9260|    public function reopenAction(int $id): JsonResponse
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "private function validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
10384|    private function validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope(array $data, Company $company, User $user): ?string

Request #40 deepseek-v4-flash P:31.84K C:285 CR:29.31K CW:0 2975ms
Reasoning
Let me look at the search endpoint more carefully. There's a subtle issue: In `searchSsmaMembers`, when `$forResponsibleManager` is true, the code: - scopeIds from teams if occurrenceTeamFilterIds non-null & non-empty - then restrict by area - allowed = leaderIds ∩ scopeIds - add own leader This seems okay. But there's no check for the "member can't change" case - if the user isn't a manager and can't change, they don't get to see options because the field is disabled. So no security issue. However, note that the endpoint `searchSsmaMembers` is not restricted to role; but returns member ids limited by scope. That is fine. Let me look at lines 10380-10500 to view validation method and where `validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope` gets called with manager logic. Let's read around 10384-10500.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 10500, "file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 10360}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 10360-10500
10360|
10361|        $teamIdStr = array_map('strval', $teamIds);
10362|        $set = [];
10363|        $members = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)
10364|            ->findBy(['company' => $company, 'isRemoved' => 0]);
10365|        foreach ($members as $m) {
10366|            $raw = $m->getTeams() ?? '';
10367|            if ($raw === '') {
10368|                continue;
10369|            }
10370|            foreach (array_map('trim', explode(',', $raw)) as $t) {
10371|                if ($t !== '' && in_array((string) $t, $teamIdStr, true)) {
10372|                    $set[(int) $m->getId()] = true;
10373|                    break;
10374|                }
10375|            }
10376|        }
10377|
10378|        return $set;
10379|    }
10380|
10381|    /**
10382|     * @param array<string, mixed> $data Payload já normalizado ({@see normalizeSsmaEventPayload}).
10383|     */
10384|    private function validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope(array $data, Company $company, User $user): ?string
10385|    {
10386|        $scope = $this->getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds($company, $user);
10387|        if ($scope === null) {
10388|            return null;
10389|        }
10390|
10391|        $details = $data['details'] ?? [];
10392|        if (!is_array($details)) {
10393|            $details = [];
10394|        }
10395|
10396|        if ($scope === []) {
10397|            // Técnico especialista SSMA (sem equipe no produto): não valida payload por equipe.
10398|            // O acesso ao evento já ?? validado por isSsmaEventVisibleUnderOccurrenceTeamDashboardScope
10399|            // e canCompleteSsmaTechnicalType antes dessa chamada, garantindo que só acessa seu tipo.
10400|            try {
10401|                $member = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
10402|                if ($member) {
10403|                    $techLinks = $this->entityManager
10404|                        ->getRepository(SsmaPermissionTagMember::class)
10405|                        ->findBy(['companyMember' => $member]);
10406|                    if (!empty($techLinks)) {
10407|                        return null;
10408|                    }
10409|                }
10410|            } catch (\Throwable) {
10411|            }
10412|
10413|            return 'Seu perfil não está vinculado a nenhuma equipe; não ? possível registrar ocorrências.';
10414|        }
10415|
10416|        $teamId = (int) ($details['team_id'] ?? 0);
10417|        if ($teamId <= 0 || !in_array($teamId, $scope, true)) {
10418|            return 'A equipe informada não está disponível para o seu perfil.';
10419|        }
10420|
10421|        $allowedMembers = $this->collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams($company, $scope);
10422|
10423|        $managerId = (int) ($details['manager_id'] ?? 0);
10424|        if ($managerId <= 0) {
10425|            return 'Informe o gestor responsável.';
10426|        }
10427|        $leaderIds = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company);
10428|        $ownLeaderId = $this->resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId($company, $user);
10429|        $managerAllowed = isset($leaderIds[$managerId]) && isset($allowedMembers[$managerId]);
10430|        if ($ownLeaderId !== null && $ownLeaderId === $managerId) {
10431|            $managerAllowed = true;
10432|        }
10433|        if (!$managerAllowed) {
10434|            return 'O gestor responsável precisa ser líder imediato de alguém e pertencer ao seu escopo de equipe/área.';
10435|        }
10436|
10437|        return null;
10438|    }
10439|
10440|    /**
10441|     * team_limitation na inspeção: a equipe é o recorte. Sem equipe, ou equipe fora do cadastro
10442|     * do perfil, a gravação é recusada. area_limitation sozinha não passa por aqui.
10443|     *
10444|     * @param array<string, mixed> $data
10445|     */
10446|    private function validateInspectionPayloadAgainstTeamScope(
10447|        array $data,
10448|        ?int $resolvedTeamId,
10449|        Company $company,
10450|        User $user,
10451|    ): ?string {
10452|        $scope = $this->getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds($company, $user);
10453|        if ($scope === null) {
10454|            return null;
10455|        }
10456|
10457|        if ($scope === []) {
10458|            try {
10459|                $member = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
10460|                if ($member) {
10461|                    $techLinks = $this->entityManager
10462|                        ->getRepository(SsmaPermissionTagMember::class)
10463|                        ->findBy(['companyMember' => $member]);
10464|                    if (!empty($techLinks)) {
10465|                        return null;
10466|                    }
10467|                }
10468|            } catch (\Throwable) {
10469|            }
10470|
10471|            return 'Seu perfil não está vinculado a nenhuma equipe; não é possível registrar inspeções.';
10472|        }
10473|
10474|        if ($resolvedTeamId === null || $resolvedTeamId <= 0 || !in_array($resolvedTeamId, $scope, true)) {
10475|            return 'A equipe informada não está disponível para o seu perfil.';
10476|        }
10477|
10478|        $allowedMembers = $this->collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams($company, $scope);
10479|        $memberIds = [];
10480|        if (!empty($data['safety_responsible_id'])) {
10481|            $memberIds[] = (int) $data['safety_responsible_id'];
10482|        }
10483|        foreach ((array) ($data['participants_ids'] ?? []) as $participantId) {
10484|            $memberIds[] = (int) $participantId;
10485|        }
10486|        foreach ((array) ($data['companion_ids'] ?? []) as $companionId) {
10487|            $memberIds[] = (int) $companionId;
10488|        }
10489|        foreach ((array) ($data['deviations'] ?? []) as $deviation) {
10490|            if (!is_array($deviation)) {
10491|                continue;
10492|            }
10493|            if (!empty($deviation['responsible_id'])) {
10494|                $memberIds[] = (int) $deviation['responsible_id'];
10495|            }
10496|        }
10497|
10498|        foreach (array_unique(array_filter(array_map('intval', $memberIds), static fn (int $id): bool => $id > 0)) as $memberId) {
10499|            if (!isset($allowedMembers[$memberId])) {
10500|                return 'O colaborador informado não pertence às suas equipes.';
Request #41 deepseek-v4-flash P:33.95K C:640 CR:32K CW:0 6072ms
Reasoning
Note that `validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope` only validates based on team scope. The confirmed finding 2 notes area restriction mismatch. Let me not repeat. Now the important part: this validation `validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope` runs only when the scope from team filter is not null. What about the case where a manager (gestor de equipe with ROLE?) who has broader access? Actually `canCreateSsmaOccurrenceType` handles permission. But wait: with new rule, a plain member with no superior (leader missing) would be blocked from creating events (manager_id required, must be a leader). Already covered by confirmed finding 1. Let me investigate other parts of the code more carefully for other issues. Let me look at the actions around `appendSsmaEventModalGestorRow` used in buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions to verify the row shape includes member key needed by template `member_by_id`. The gestores list needs to include rows that the JS can map to member ids; that's about enrichment via enrichSsmaMemberRowsWithTeamMeta. Potential issue: In template occurrence_view, they now use `created_by_member_id` field. That field only populated for `mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow` rows (with created_by_member_id). For other occurrence types (e.g., loaded from SsmaOccurrence table?) do they include created_by_member_id? Let's search for created_by_member_id to see where it's set. In loadOccurrences SQL there's presumably a SELECT list. In diff at line 14963 area, in a method collecting member ids to prefetch for display, `$add($row['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0);` added. That suggests occurrence list rows may now include created_by_member_id. Where is created_by_member_id set for occurrence rows (non-event rows)? Let me search for created_by_member_id occurrences across the file. Let me check the template's `member_by_id` map: constructed presumably from occurrence person fields, people_ids, responsible_ids, manager, etc. If created_by_member_id is added into the member fetch (the `$add` list in method at 14963) then the template should have member_by_id populated for created_by_member_id. But only if that map method is used to load member_by_id. Let me look at the template to see how member_by_id is built. Let me read occurrence_view.html.twig top portion to understand how the data (occurrence array) is passed and how member_by_id map is built.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig", "start_line": 1, "end_line": 120}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig (Total lines: 3231)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-120
1|{% extends user_uses_admin_hub_shell() ? 'layoutAdmin.html.twig' : 'layoutUser.html.twig' %}
2|
3|{% block headercss %}
4|    {{ parent() }}
5|    <link rel="stylesheet" href="{{ asset('assets/styles/file-management/index.css') }}">
6|    <style>
7|        /* Detalhe da ocorrência: título + ações num único bloco sticky (evita barra subir com top:62px fixo). */
8|        @media (min-width: 1024px) {
9|            section.ssma-module.ssma-occurrence-detail .ssma-occ-detail-sticky-head {
10|                position: sticky;
11|                top: 0;
12|                z-index: 1038;
13|                background: var(--surface, #fff);
14|                overflow: visible;
15|            }
16|
17|            section.ssma-module.ssma-occurrence-detail .ssma-occ-detail-sticky-head .modern-header.no-tabs {
18|                position: static !important;
19|                top: auto !important;
20|                min-height: 0;
21|            }
22|
23|            section.ssma-module.ssma-occurrence-detail .ssma-occ-detail-sticky-head #occ_view_controls.modern-header-actions {
24|                position: static !important;
25|                top: auto !important;
26|                z-index: auto;
27|                overflow: visible;
28|            }
29|        }
30|
31|        /* Severity badge (colors applied inline via Twig) */
32|        .occ-severity-badge {
33|            display: inline-flex;
34|            align-items: center;
35|            gap: 5px;
36|            border-radius: 100px;
37|            border: 1px solid;
38|            padding: 4px 12px;
39|            font-weight: 600;
40|        }
41|
42|        .ssma-action-card-label {
43|            color: #8B9199;
44|            font-size: 12px;
45|            font-weight: 500;
46|            line-height: 1.2;
47|        }
48|
49|        .ssma-action-card-role-label {
50|            font-size: 11px;
51|            font-weight: 600;
52|            min-width: 64px;
53|            color: #8B9199;
54|        }
55|
56|        .ssma-action-card-type {
57|            color: #5C5D5D;
58|            font-size: 14px;
59|            line-height: 1.3;
60|        }
61|
62|        .ssma-validation-badge {
63|            display: inline-flex;
64|            align-items: center;
65|            gap: 4px;
66|            padding: 2px 8px;
67|            border-radius: 10px;
68|            border: 1px solid transparent;
69|            font-size: 11px;
70|            font-weight: 600;
71|            line-height: 1.2;
72|            white-space: nowrap;
73|        }
74|
75|        .ssma-action-plan-deadline-tag {
76|            font-size: 11px;
77|            font-weight: 600;
78|            line-height: 1.2;
79|        }
80|
81|        .ssma-action-menu-toggle {
82|            box-shadow: none !important;
83|            text-decoration: none !important;
84|            line-height: 1;
85|        }
86|
87|        .ssma-action-menu-danger {
88|            color: #ff5a5f !important;
89|        }
90|
91|        .ssma-action-menu-danger:hover,
92|        .ssma-action-menu-danger:focus {
93|            color: #ff5a5f !important;
94|            background: rgba(255, 90, 95, 0.10) !important;
95|        }
96|
97|        .occurrence-view-page .modern-header-actions .mhs-btn-secondary,
98|        .occurrence-view-page .ssma-occ-detail-sticky-head .mhs-btn-secondary {
99|            background: var(--app-brand-primary-emphasis, var(--company-theme1-800, #135C66));
100|            color: var(--app-brand-primary-contrast, #FFFFFF) !important;
101|        }
102|
103|        .occurrence-view-page .modern-header-actions .mhs-btn-secondary:hover,
104|        .occurrence-view-page .modern-header-actions .mhs-btn-secondary:focus,
105|        .occurrence-view-page .ssma-occ-detail-sticky-head .mhs-btn-secondary:hover,
106|        .occurrence-view-page .ssma-occ-detail-sticky-head .mhs-btn-secondary:focus {
107|            background: var(--company-theme1-900, var(--app-brand-primary-emphasis, #135C66));
108|            color: var(--app-brand-primary-contrast, #FFFFFF) !important;
109|        }
110|
111|        .occurrence-view-page .ssma-occ-reports-dropdown {
112|            position: relative;
113|            z-index: 1040;
114|        }
115|
116|        .occurrence-view-page .ssma-occ-reports-dropdown > .mhs-btn-secondary.dropdown-toggle::after {
117|            display: none;
118|        }
119|
120|        .occurrence-view-page .ssma-occ-reports-dropdown .ssma-occ-reports-chevron {
Request #42 deepseek-v4-flash P:35.91K C:245 CR:34.56K CW:0 2471ms
Reasoning
This template is huge; reading top 100 lines not needed. I need to understand how member_by_id is built in this template, and the data keys used (`occurrence.created_by_member_id`, `manager_member`, `member_by_id`). Let me search in template for where member_by_id is set and where occurrence comes from. Let me search the twig for "member_by_id" assignments.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "member_by_id\\[", "file_patterns": ["templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig"]}
No matches found
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig", "start_line": 440, "end_line": 560}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig (Total lines: 3231)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 440-560
440|            flex-direction: column;
441|            align-items: center;
442|            justify-content: center;
443|            gap: 10px;
444|        }
445|
446|        .ssma-occ-evidence-row .occ-view-drop-zone > span:not(.text-muted) {
447|            font-size: 14px !important;
448|            font-weight: 700 !important;
449|            color: #374151 !important;
450|            text-align: center;
451|            line-height: 1.3;
452|        }
453|
454|        .ssma-occ-evidence-row .occ-view-drop-zone > .text-muted {
455|            font-size: 12px !important;
456|            color: #8B9199 !important;
457|        }
458|
459|        #occ-view-procedures-list .occ-view-drop-zone {
460|            min-height: 160px;
461|        }
462|
463|        .ssma-evidence-card {
464|            transition: none !important;
465|            cursor: default;
466|            box-shadow: none !important;
467|        }
468|
469|        .ssma-evidence-card:hover {
470|            transform: none !important;
471|            border-color: #EEEFF4 !important;
472|            background-color: #FFFFFF !important;
473|            filter: none !important;
474|            opacity: 1 !important;
475|        }
476|
477|        .ssma-evidence-card *,
478|        .ssma-evidence-card:hover * {
479|            transition: none !important;
480|        }
481|
482|        .ssma-evidence-card .card-footer {
483|            border-top: 0 !important;
484|        }
485|
486|    </style>
487|{% endblock %}
488|
489|{% block container %}
490|{% set member_by_id = {} %}
491|{% for member in allMembers %}
492|    {% set member_by_id = member_by_id|merge({ ('member_' ~ member.id): member }) %}
493|{% endfor %}
494|
495|{% set severity_key       = occurrence.severity_value|default('') %}
496|{% set sev                = severity_map[severity_key] ?? { 'label': '—', 'dot': '#6c757d', 'bg_light': 'rgba(108,117,125,0.10)' } %}
497|{% set gravity_label      = occurrence.gravity_label|default(occurrence.potential_severity_label|default(sev.label)) %}
498|{% set guidance           = severity_guidance[severity_key] ?? null %}
499|{% set _occ_approval      = occurrence.occurrence_approval.status|default('') %}
500|{% set _is_rejected_occ   = occurrence.is_ssma_event|default(false) and _occ_approval == 'rejected' %}
501|{% set normalized_status  = _is_rejected_occ
502|    ? 'readequacao'
503|    : occurrence.status_value|default('')|replace({'-': '_'}) %}
504|{% set stat               = status_map[normalized_status] ?? { 'label': '—', 'dot': '#6c757d' } %}
505|{% set type_label         = type_labels[occurrence.type_value|default('')]       ?? occurrence.type_value|default('—') %}
506|{% set nature_label       = nature_labels[occurrence.nature_value|default('')]   ?? occurrence.nature_value|default('—') %}
507|{% set approach_label     = approach_labels[occurrence.approach_value|default('')] ?? occurrence.approach_value|default('—') %}
508|{% set gmr_label          = occurrence.gmr|default('') != '' ? occurrence.gmr : 'Não informado' %}
509|{% set category_label     = occurrence.category|default('') != '' ? occurrence.category : 'Não informado' %}
510|{% set location_label     = location_labels[occurrence.location_value|default('')] ?? occurrence.location_value|default('—') %}
511|{% set responsible_id     = occurrence.responsible_ids|default([])|first %}
512|{% set manager_member_key = occurrence.manager_id is defined ? ('member_' ~ occurrence.manager_id) : '' %}
513|{% set manager_member     = manager_member_key and member_by_id[manager_member_key] is defined ? member_by_id[manager_member_key] : null %}
514|{% set team_name = '—' %}
515|{% for team in teams %}
516|    {% if team.id == occurrence.team_id %}{% set team_name = team.name %}{% endif %}
517|{% endfor %}
518|{% set people_members = [] %}
519|{% for person_id in occurrence.people_ids|default([]) %}
520|    {% set person_key = 'member_' ~ person_id %}
521|    {% if member_by_id[person_key] is defined %}
522|        {% set people_members = people_members|merge([member_by_id[person_key]]) %}
523|    {% endif %}
524|{% endfor %}
525|{% set is_ros_occurrence = occurrence.type_value|default('') == 'ROS' %}
526|{% set created_by_lookup_id = occurrence.created_by_member_id|default(occurrence.created_by_id|default(null)) %}
527|{% set created_by_member_key = created_by_lookup_id ? ('member_' ~ created_by_lookup_id) : '' %}
528|{% set created_by_member = created_by_member_key and member_by_id[created_by_member_key] is defined ? member_by_id[created_by_member_key] : null %}
529|{% set reported_by_member = created_by_member ?: manager_member %}
530|{% set witness_members = [] %}
531|{% for witness_id in occurrence.witness_ids|default([]) %}
532|    {% set witness_key = 'member_' ~ witness_id %}
533|    {% if member_by_id[witness_key] is defined %}
534|        {% set witness_members = witness_members|merge([member_by_id[witness_key]]) %}
535|    {% endif %}
536|{% endfor %}
537|{% set responsible_member_key = responsible_id is not null ? ('member_' ~ responsible_id) : '' %}
538|{% set evidence_uploader_member = responsible_member_key and member_by_id[responsible_member_key] is defined
539|    ? member_by_id[responsible_member_key]
540|    : manager_member %}
541|{% set evidence_chip_initials = [] %}
542|{% if people_members|length > 0 %}
543|    {% set evidence_chip_initials = evidence_chip_initials|merge([people_members[0].name|default('R')|slice(0, 1)|upper]) %}
544|{% endif %}
545|{% if evidence_uploader_member and evidence_uploader_member.name|default('') != '' %}
546|    {% set evidence_chip_initials = evidence_chip_initials|merge([evidence_uploader_member.name|slice(0, 1)|upper]) %}
547|{% else %}
548|    {% set evidence_chip_initials = evidence_chip_initials|merge(['A']) %}
549|{% endif %}
550|{% if people_members|length > 1 %}
551|    {% set evidence_chip_initials = evidence_chip_initials|merge([people_members[1].name|default('J')|slice(0, 1)|upper]) %}
552|{% endif %}
553|
554|<section class="members-content zero-padding modern-layout ssma-module occurrence-view-page ssma-occurrence-detail">
555|    {% include 'ssma/partials/_shared_module_assets.html.twig' with {
556|        allMembers: allMembers|default([])
557|    } %}
558|    {# Readonly: view inclui o modal só com can_edit — entry precisa ficar aqui também.
559|       Fonte: partial único (Encore deduplica se o modal também incluir). #}
560|    {% include 'ssma/partials/_ssma_body_map_entry.html.twig' %}
Request #43 deepseek-v4-flash P:38.02K C:785 CR:36.1K CW:0 6192ms
Reasoning
Key observation in the template: `manager_member` is set from member_by_id via manager_id. `created_by_lookup_id` uses created_by_member_id fallback created_by_id. But member_by_id map is built from `allMembers` passed to the template. For the "Responsável pelo cadastro" to render correctly, the created_by_member must be present in allMembers list. The template's member_by_id is built only from `allMembers` in the view context. But allMembers might be the full member list passed by controller. So if the creator is removed (isRemoved=1), they might not appear in allMembers. Now confirmed finding 4 mentions reported_by_member fallback shows manager. Not repeat. Now let me focus on cross-file concerns: the template label changed to "Responsável pelo cadastro" and shows created_by_member. Previously ROS "Relatado por" used manager_member OR created_by_member. Now reported_by_member = created_by_member ?: manager_member, and section displays created_by_member first else reported_by_member. Fine. However, for non-event (regular occurrence?) the `created_by_member_id` field might not be present, and created_by_id for regular occurrences may refer to a user id. Actually regular "occurrence" (inspection/approach/... ?). But in this template, occurrence refers to an occurrence row. For non-event occurrence created_by_id could be a user. member_by_id lookup uses member ids. Wait - line 526: `created_by_lookup_id = occurrence.created_by_member_id|default(occurrence.created_by_id|default(null))`. If created_by_member_id missing, it uses created_by_id which is a USER id, not member id. Then `member_by_id['member_' ~ user_id]` probably not found, so created_by_member null. Then falls back to reported_by_member which = created_by_member ?: manager_member (manager_member). Display: "Responsável pelo cadastro" shows manager's avatar. That's the confirmed finding 4 (fallback displays manager). Already reported. Now, question: does occurrence_view get 'created_by_member_id' for non-SsmaEvent occurrence types? Let me examine what kind of rows populate `occurrence` for view. There is route `admin_ssma_occurrence_view`? Actually the view template probably receives a single occurrence built by mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow or a detail builder. created_by_member_id for SsmaEvent rows only added in mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow. For other types (occurrence from SsmaOccurrence entity) maybe the controller passes created_by_member_id? Let me search the controller for created_by_member_id. Let me check where the detail row for event (kind=event) is created, probably `loadSsmaOccurrenceForView`? and whether it uses mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow or a separate mapper. Let me search.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "created_by_member_id", "file_patterns": ["src/Controller/SsmaController.php"]}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 6
11680|        $createdByMemberId = (int) ($occurrence['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0);
12356|        $createdByMemberId = (int) ($row['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0);
12361|            $row['created_by_member_id'] = $createdByMemberId;
13311|                if ($viewerMemberIdForCreated > 0 && (int) ($o['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0) === $viewerMemberIdForCreated) {
14966|            $add($row['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0);
15590|            'created_by_member_id'   => $this->resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId($e->getCompany(), $e->getCreatedById()),

code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow", "file_patterns": ["src/Controller/SsmaController.php"]}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 6
12424|            $row = $this->mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow($event, $teamsById);
14912|            $result[] = $this->mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow($event, $teamsById);
15214|                $result[] = $this->mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow($event, $teamsById);
15322|                $evtById[(int) $event->getId()] = $this->mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow($event, $teamsById);
15470|    private function mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow(SsmaEvent $e, array $teamsById): array
16701|            $row = $this->mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow($event, $teamsById);

Request #44 deepseek-v4-flash P:39.21K C:189 CR:38.78K CW:0 2348ms
Reasoning
Let me look at mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow (line 15470) and the SQL query that generates the list of occurrences (from SsmaOccurrence? loadOccurrences). Let's check the SQL at 12074-12109: that SQL may be a CTE that selects occurrence columns. Let me read lines 12040-12200 to understand how rows include created_by fields. The SQL is long. Let me read 12074 forward.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 12040, "end_line": 12220}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 12040-12220
12040|        }
12041|
12042|        if (in_array($type, $this->resolveCurrentUserTechnicalTypes($company, $user), true)) {
12043|            return true;
12044|        }
12045|
12046|        if (!in_array($type, ['ROS', 'QUASE_ACIDENTE'], true)) {
12047|            return false;
12048|        }
12049|
12050|        $loggedMember = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
12051|        if (!$loggedMember) {
12052|            return false;
12053|        }
12054|
12055|        return $this->isSsmaEventDirectManagerOfReporter(
12056|            $company,
12057|            $loggedMember,
12058|            $type,
12059|            $details,
12060|            $createdByUserId
12061|        );
12062|    }
12063|
12064|    /**
12065|     * @param array<string, mixed> $details
12066|     */
12067|    private function resolveSsmaEventReporterMemberId(
12068|        Company $company,
12069|        string $type,
12070|        array $details,
12071|        int $createdByUserId = 0
12072|    ): ?int {
12073|        if ($type === 'ROS') {
12074|            $managerId = (int) ($details['manager_id'] ?? 0);
12075|            if ($managerId > 0) {
12076|                return $managerId;
12077|            }
12078|        }
12079|
12080|        if ($type === 'QUASE_ACIDENTE') {
12081|            $personId = (int) ($details['person_id'] ?? 0);
12082|            if ($personId > 0) {
12083|                return $personId;
12084|            }
12085|            $peopleRaw = $details['people_ids'] ?? [];
12086|            if (is_string($peopleRaw) && $peopleRaw !== '') {
12087|                $peopleRaw = array_map('trim', explode(',', $peopleRaw));
12088|            }
12089|            if (is_array($peopleRaw)) {
12090|                foreach ($peopleRaw as $pid) {
12091|                    $pid = (int) $pid;
12092|                    if ($pid > 0) {
12093|                        return $pid;
12094|                    }
12095|                }
12096|            }
12097|        }
12098|
12099|        if ($createdByUserId > 0) {
12100|            return $this->resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId($company, $createdByUserId);
12101|        }
12102|
12103|        return null;
12104|    }
12105|
12106|    private function resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId(Company $company, int $userId): ?int
12107|    {
12108|        if ($userId <= 0) {
12109|            return null;
12110|        }
12111|
12112|        $cacheKey = ((int) $company->getId()) . ':' . $userId;
12113|        if (array_key_exists($cacheKey, $this->ssmaMemberIdByUserIdCache)) {
12114|            return $this->ssmaMemberIdByUserIdCache[$cacheKey];
12115|        }
12116|
12117|        $members = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)
12118|            ->findBy(['company' => $company, 'user' => $userId, 'isRemoved' => 0]);
12119|
12120|        $resolved = null;
12121|        foreach ($members as $member) {
12122|            if ($member instanceof CompanyMembers) {
12123|                $resolved = (int) $member->getId();
12124|                break;
12125|            }
12126|        }
12127|
12128|        $this->ssmaMemberIdByUserIdCache[$cacheKey] = $resolved;
12129|
12130|        return $resolved;
12131|    }
12132|
12133|    /**
12134|     * Gestor (equipe/área/administrador) ou tenant/plataforma pode trocar o "Gestor responsável".
12135|     * Membro e supervisor não — o campo fica travado no líder imediato de quem está cadastrando.
12136|     */
12137|    private function canSelectSsmaEventResponsibleManager(?Company $company, ?User $user): bool
12138|    {
12139|        if (
12140|            $this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN')
12141|            || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER')
12142|            || $this->isGranted('ROLE_TENANT')
12143|        ) {
12144|            return true;
12145|        }
12146|        if (!$company || !$user) {
12147|            return false;
12148|        }
12149|
12150|        $member = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
12151|        if (!$member instanceof CompanyMembers) {
12152|            return false;
12153|        }
12154|        if ($this->memberIsSsmaGestorAdministrador($member)) {
12155|            return true;
12156|        }
12157|
12158|        $tagName = $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($member)?->getName();
12159|
12160|        return in_array($tagName, [
12161|            'Gestor de Equipe',
12162|            SsmaAreaLimitationScope::TAG_GESTOR_AREA,
12163|            'Gestor Administrador',
12164|        ], true);
12165|    }
12166|
12167|    private function resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId(Company $company, User $user): ?int
12168|    {
12169|        $member = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
12170|        if (!$member instanceof CompanyMembers) {
12171|            return null;
12172|        }
12173|
12174|        $superior = $member->getSuperior();
12175|        if (!$superior instanceof CompanyMembers || (int) $superior->getIsRemoved() === 1) {
12176|            return null;
12177|        }
12178|        if ($superior->getCompany()?->getId() !== $company->getId()) {
12179|            return null;
12180|        }
12181|
12182|        $id = (int) $superior->getId();
12183|
12184|        return $id > 0 ? $id : null;
12185|    }
12186|
12187|    /**
12188|     * Pessoas que são "Responsável" (superior) de pelo menos um colaborador ativo.
12189|     * Fonte: campo Responsável do cadastro em /my-company/members.
12190|     *
12191|     * @return array<int, true>
12192|     */
12193|    private function collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds(Company $company): array
12194|    {
12195|        if ($this->ssmaImmediateLeaderMemberIdsCache !== null) {
12196|            return $this->ssmaImmediateLeaderMemberIdsCache;
12197|        }
12198|
12199|        $set = [];
12200|        try {
12201|            $rows = $this->entityManager->createQueryBuilder()
12202|                ->select('DISTINCT IDENTITY(cm.superior) AS sid')
12203|                ->from(CompanyMembers::class, 'cm')
12204|                ->where('cm.company = :company')
12205|                ->andWhere('cm.isRemoved = 0')
12206|                ->andWhere('cm.superior IS NOT NULL')
12207|                ->setParameter('company', $company)
12208|                ->getQuery()
12209|                ->getArrayResult();
12210|            foreach ($rows as $row) {
12211|                $id = (int) ($row['sid'] ?? 0);
12212|                if ($id > 0) {
12213|                    $set[$id] = true;
12214|                }
12215|            }
12216|        } catch (\Throwable) {
12217|            $members = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)
12218|                ->findBy(['company' => $company, 'isRemoved' => 0]);
12219|            foreach ($members as $member) {
12220|                if (!$member instanceof CompanyMembers) {
Request #45 deepseek-v4-flash P:41.4K C:432 CR:39.3K CW:0 4618ms
Reasoning
Note `collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds` cache `ssmaImmediateLeaderMemberIdsCache` is not keyed by company. If the same controller instance handles multiple companies within one request (e.g., bulk operations where the controller is instantiated per action, not per company; but maybe there's some manager-scope loading across companies? Usually Symfony controllers are per-request so company fixed). But there could be calls for different companies within one request (network subsidiaries). Risk low. However, the try-catch: the query selects DISTINCT IDENTITY(cm.superior) and then the catch block is a fallback when a DB failure; fine. Wait a subtle issue with `collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds`: it lists superior members who themselves may be removed members. The condition filters cm.isRemoved=0 on the child (member whose superior is X), but the superior might be removed member. A removed leader still counted. But they'd probably filter later with allowedMemberMap from member lists (allMembers). In the search endpoint, they intersect leader ids with scope map (member ids belonging to teams, which are active? `collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams` loads active members). In validate, allowedMembers active. So a removed superior won't be in allowedMembers; but manager could still be in options if allMembers includes removed? allMembers from loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite filters isRemoved presumably. So ok. Now, examine the occurrence listing SQL and view logic at lines 14900-15000 (the `$add` function). That is part of prefetching display member data. Let me inspect region 14880-15050.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 14840, "end_line": 15060}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 14840-15060
14840|                    $occHasInv[(int) $r['occurrence_id']] = true;
14841|                }
14842|            } catch (\Throwable) {
14843|                // Tabela pode estar ausente em ambientes novos; continua com false
14844|            }
14845|        }
14846|
14847|        if ($evtIds !== []) {
14848|            $ph = implode(',', array_fill(0, count($evtIds), '?'));
14849|            try {
14850|                $rows = $conn->fetchAllAssociative(
14851|                    "SELECT DISTINCT event_id FROM ssma_actions
14852|                     WHERE company_id = ? AND solved = 0 AND event_id IN ($ph) AND $invTypeSql",
14853|                    array_merge([$companyId], $evtIds)
14854|                );
14855|                foreach ($rows as $r) {
14856|                    $evtHasInv[(int) $r['event_id']] = true;
14857|                }
14858|            } catch (\Throwable) {
14859|                // idem
14860|            }
14861|        }
14862|
14863|        foreach ($occurrences as $idx => $row) {
14864|            $statusKey = SsmaNativeInvestigationSignalsV1Builder::normalizeWorkflowStatus((string) ($row['status_value'] ?? ''));
14865|            $treeId    = (int) ($row['cause_tree_id'] ?? 0);
14866|            $investigating = $treeId > 0 && ($treeStatusById[$treeId] ?? '') === 'investigating';
14867|
14868|            $entityId = (int) ($row['id'] ?? 0);
14869|            if (!empty($row['is_ssma_event'])) {
14870|                $hasInvAction = isset($evtHasInv[$entityId]);
14871|            } else {
14872|                $hasInvAction = isset($occHasInv[$entityId]);
14873|            }
14874|
14875|            $occurrences[$idx]['committee_trigger'] = [
14876|                'status_investigada'           => $statusKey === 'investigada',
14877|                'has_open_investigation_action' => $hasInvAction,
14878|                'cause_tree_investigating'      => $investigating,
14879|            ];
14880|        }
14881|
14882|        return $occurrences;
14883|    }
14884|
14885|    /**
14886|     * Linhas de listagem para a tela de detalhe — uma ocorrência legada e/ou evento SSMA pelo ID.
14887|     *
14888|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $allMembers
14889|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $teams
14890|     *
14891|     * @return list<array<string, mixed>>
14892|     */
14893|    private function loadOccurrenceListRowsForDetailView(
14894|        Company $company,
14895|        int $id,
14896|        array $allMembers,
14897|        array $teams
14898|    ): array {
14899|        $teamsById = array_column($teams, null, 'id');
14900|        $membersById = array_column($allMembers, null, 'id');
14901|        $result = [];
14902|
14903|        $legacy = $this->entityManager->getRepository(SsmaOccurrence::class)
14904|            ->findOneBy(['id' => $id, 'company' => $company]);
14905|        if ($legacy instanceof SsmaOccurrence) {
14906|            $result[] = $this->mapSsmaOccurrenceEntityToListRow($legacy, $teamsById);
14907|        }
14908|
14909|        $event = $this->entityManager->getRepository(SsmaEvent::class)
14910|            ->findOneBy(['id' => $id, 'company' => $company]);
14911|        if ($event instanceof SsmaEvent) {
14912|            $result[] = $this->mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow($event, $teamsById);
14913|        }
14914|
14915|        foreach ($result as $idx => $row) {
14916|            $result[$idx] = $this->enrichOccurrenceManagerFields($row, $membersById, $company);
14917|        }
14918|
14919|        if ($result === []) {
14920|            return [];
14921|        }
14922|
14923|        $companyId = (int) $company->getId();
14924|        foreach ($result as $idx => $occRow) {
14925|            $entityId = (int) ($occRow['id'] ?? 0);
14926|            $isEvent = !empty($occRow['is_ssma_event']);
14927|            $treeMeta = $this->ssmaCauseTreeService->resolveEntityTreeMeta($companyId, $entityId, $isEvent);
14928|            $occRow['cause_tree_id'] = $treeMeta['cause_tree_id'];
14929|            $result[$idx] = $this->applyOccurrenceCommitteeTriggerFlags($occRow, $company, $treeMeta['tree_status']);
14930|        }
14931|
14932|        return $this->enrichOccurrencesGravityLabels($result);
14933|    }
14934|
14935|    /**
14936|     * Mantém no SSR do detalhe apenas membros citados na ocorrência/ações + gestores do modal.
14937|     *
14938|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $allMembers
14939|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $occurrences
14940|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $actionsTaken
14941|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $gestores
14942|     *
14943|     * @return list<array<string, mixed>>
14944|     */
14945|    private function filterSsmaMembersToReferencedForDetail(
14946|        array $allMembers,
14947|        array $occurrences,
14948|        array $actionsTaken,
14949|        array $gestores
14950|    ): array {
14951|        $keep = [];
14952|        $add = static function (mixed $id) use (&$keep): void {
14953|            $id = (int) $id;
14954|            if ($id > 0) {
14955|                $keep[$id] = true;
14956|            }
14957|        };
14958|
14959|        foreach ($gestores as $g) {
14960|            $add($g['id'] ?? 0);
14961|        }
14962|
14963|        foreach ($occurrences as $row) {
14964|            $add($row['manager_id'] ?? 0);
14965|            $add($row['person_id'] ?? 0);
14966|            $add($row['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0);
14967|            $add($row['created_by_id'] ?? 0);
14968|            $add($row['area_responsible_id'] ?? 0);
14969|            foreach (array_merge(
14970|                (array) ($row['people_ids'] ?? []),
14971|                (array) ($row['responsible_ids'] ?? []),
14972|                (array) ($row['witness_ids'] ?? [])
14973|            ) as $pid) {
14974|                $add($pid);
14975|            }
14976|        }
14977|
14978|        foreach ($actionsTaken as $action) {
14979|            $add($action['responsible_id'] ?? 0);
14980|            $add($action['validator_id'] ?? 0);
14981|            $add($action['validator_member_id'] ?? 0);
14982|            foreach ((array) ($action['responsible_ids'] ?? []) as $pid) {
14983|                $add($pid);
14984|            }
14985|            $add($action['created_by_id'] ?? 0);
14986|        }
14987|
14988|        if ($keep === []) {
14989|            return array_slice($allMembers, 0, 50);
14990|        }
14991|
14992|        return array_values(array_filter(
14993|            $allMembers,
14994|            static fn (array $m): bool => isset($keep[(int) ($m['id'] ?? 0)])
14995|        ));
14996|    }
14997|
14998|    /**
14999|     * Flags de comitê para uma única linha (detalhe) — sem carregar todas as árvores da empresa.
15000|     *
15001|     * @param array<string, mixed> $row
15002|     *
15003|     * @return array<string, mixed>
15004|     */
15005|    private function applyOccurrenceCommitteeTriggerFlags(array $row, Company $company, ?string $treeStatus): array
15006|    {
15007|        $companyId = (int) $company->getId();
15008|        $entityId = (int) ($row['id'] ?? 0);
15009|        $isEvent = !empty($row['is_ssma_event']);
15010|        $statusKey = SsmaNativeInvestigationSignalsV1Builder::normalizeWorkflowStatus((string) ($row['status_value'] ?? ''));
15011|        $treeId = (int) ($row['cause_tree_id'] ?? 0);
15012|        $investigating = $treeId > 0 && ($treeStatus ?? '') === 'investigating';
15013|        $hasInvAction = false;
15014|
15015|        if ($entityId > 0) {
15016|            $conn = $this->entityManager->getConnection();
15017|            $invTypeSql = "(LOWER(type) LIKE '%investig%' OR LOWER(type) = 'investigacao')";
15018|            try {
15019|                if ($isEvent) {
15020|                    $hasInvAction = (bool) $conn->fetchOne(
15021|                        "SELECT 1 FROM ssma_actions WHERE company_id = ? AND solved = 0 AND event_id = ? AND $invTypeSql LIMIT 1",
15022|                        [$companyId, $entityId]
15023|                    );
15024|                } else {
15025|                    $hasInvAction = (bool) $conn->fetchOne(
15026|                        "SELECT 1 FROM ssma_actions WHERE company_id = ? AND solved = 0 AND occurrence_id = ? AND $invTypeSql LIMIT 1",
15027|                        [$companyId, $entityId]
15028|                    );
15029|                }
15030|            } catch (\Throwable) {
15031|                // Tabela pode estar ausente em ambientes novos
15032|            }
15033|        }
15034|
15035|        $row['committee_trigger'] = [
15036|            'status_investigada'            => $statusKey === 'investigada',
15037|            'has_open_investigation_action' => $hasInvAction,
15038|            'cause_tree_investigating'      => $investigating,
15039|        ];
15040|
15041|        return $row;
15042|    }
15043|
15044|    /**
15045|     * Ações vinculadas a uma ocorrência legada ou evento SSMA (detalhe / relatório).
15046|     *
15047|     * @return list<array<string, mixed>>
15048|     */
15049|    private function loadActionsForOccurrenceDetail(Company $company, int $occurrenceId): array
15050|    {
15051|        /** @var SsmaAction[] $rows */
15052|        $rows = $this->entityManager->getRepository(SsmaAction::class)
15053|            ->createQueryBuilder('a')
15054|            ->where('a.company = :company')
15055|            ->andWhere('(IDENTITY(a.occurrence) = :id OR IDENTITY(a.event) = :id)')
15056|            ->setParameter('company', $company)
15057|            ->setParameter('id', $occurrenceId)
15058|            ->orderBy('a.createdAt', 'DESC')
15059|            ->getQuery()
15060|            ->getResult();
Request #46 deepseek-v4-flash P:44.73K C:1.18K CR:41.73K CW:0 10637ms
Reasoning
Wait - in `filterSsmaMembersToReferencedForDetail`, at line 14966-14967, `created_by_id` is added to `$keep` - `$add($row['created_by_id'] ?? 0)`. But note `$add` casts to int: `$id = (int) $id`. If created_by_id is a user id but the member_by_id map in the template uses member ids, then `$keep` will include the USER id rather than the member id. The filter keeps members from allMembers where member id is in keep. allMembers is member list. So created_by_id (a USER id) typically not equal to any member id, so the actual creator member might NOT be included unless the member id is included via created_by_member_id or manager etc. Then template: `member_by_id` only includes the filtered members. For creator member to render, its member id must be kept. The new `created_by_member_id` field on event rows is added at line 14966, so for event rows, keep includes creator member id. Good. But for legacy SsmaOccurrence entity rows (from mapSsmaOccurrenceEntityToListRow), is created_by_member_id present? Not added. And created_by_id in mapSsmaOccurrenceEntityToListRow may not be included at all, or may be a user id. If the legacy occurrence's created_by id is a user and creator member not among kept ids (manager etc.), created_by_member lookup in template would be null → then fallback shows manager member (bug, confirmed finding 4). But that's already reported. Anyway, let's look at what other possible bugs exist that aren't in confirmed findings. Let me now consider the area in `loadOccurrences` where SQL select may now include created_by_member_id (the CTE part). Actually for SQL-based occurrence rows (legacy occurrences), created_by fields - there is a method building occurrence list rows from the DB in SQL. Let's find "created_by_id" select from ssma_occurrences table in SQL that we saw near 12074? Wait lines 12074-12109 showed a long SQL with text starting at 12074. Let's look at that SQL header. Actually we looked at lines 12040-12220 which contain resolveSsmaEventReporterMemberId etc. The SQL block near 12074 wasn't shown because we only looked at part. Let me search for `FROM ssma_occurrences` in controller. Actually maybe not needed for our review. Let's consider other candidate issues: 1. In the picker path `$forResponsibleManager` — scope restriction uses team filter and area, but not restricted to the capability "can select" managers. However, as noted, plain members cannot change manager, and the options fetched remotely are only loaded for select2 when manager can change. But wait — this search endpoint `searchSsmaMembers` is also used by other comboboxes? The remoteExtraParams is set in the modal. Since the manager select field is disabled for non-managers and only initialized when SSMA_CAN_CHANGE_EVENT_MANAGER, remote not fired. But note: `searchSsmaMembers` with responsible_manager:1 returns only immediate leaders. But a Gestor de Equipe who can select managers in his team scope gets list restricted to team scope. In server-side `applySsmaEventManagerAssignment`, allowed manager set uses team filter scope only (no area) while view uses area too (confirmed finding 2). OK already reported. 2. Cross-company: `collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds` uses company from request, which came from getSsmaCompany (the current user's company in context). OK. 3. `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser`: For plain members (view restricted to team scope), the code appends events created by the user that were already filtered out. But it appends them WITHOUT checking visibility/status type constraints? It loads all events for company & createdById regardless of scope — and doesn't restrict by the user's allowed types etc. Actually the events created by the current user should always be visible to the creator, per `isSsmaEventVisibleUnderOccurrenceTeamDashboardScope` change that adds creator check. But note the scope also might include `area` restriction. Let's check whether `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser` gets invoked in area-restricted branch too: The elseif added in the branch where team or area filter is not null. It fetches events created by the user company-wide without area restriction. Then would display them despite area restriction? The point is creator should see own creations. But area restriction for the module maybe not applied to own events? Hmm. Area restriction seems about prevention actions maybe. Not clearly a bug. But there is another more concrete correctness concern: The `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser` appends events without applying the `memberIsPlain`? It's called in two branches. Let's read the surrounding code in detail around lines 13300-13530 and 13490-13510. Actually that's within `loadOccurrences`? Let me read around 13270-13520.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 13530, "file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 13260}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 13260-13530
13260|            $defaultInspectionTeamId = (int) ($ssmaEventFormDefaults['team_id'] ?? 0) ?: null;
13261|            if ($defaultInspectionTeamId === null && count($teamsForInspectionModal) === 1) {
13262|                $defaultInspectionTeamId = (int) ($teamsForInspectionModal[0]['id'] ?? 0) ?: null;
13263|            }
13264|        }
13265|        usort($teamsForInspectionModal, static function (array $a, array $b): int {
13266|            return strcasecmp((string) ($a['name'] ?? ''), (string) ($b['name'] ?? ''));
13267|        });
13268|
13269|        // Técnico especialista SSMA: tem SsmaPermissionTagMember mas sem gestão ou supervisão de equipe.
13270|        // O scope retornado por getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds ?? [] (sem equipe atribuída no produto),
13271|        // o que zeraria todas as ocorrências se o filtro de equipe fosse aplicado.
13272|        // Em vez disso, aplicamos um filtro por tipo de ocorrência após o bloco de equipe.
13273|        $isTechSpecialistOnly = !$ssmaCanManageOccurrences
13274|            && !$this->isSsmaViewer()
13275|            && $occurrenceTeamFilterIds === []
13276|            && !empty($userTechnicalTypes);
13277|
13278|        if ($occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== null && !$isTechSpecialistOnly) {
13279|            $teamIdStr = array_map('strval', $occurrenceTeamFilterIds);
13280|
13281|            // Coleta IDs de membros pertencentes às equipes do viewer
13282|            $memberIdsInTeams = [];
13283|            foreach ($teams as $team) {
13284|                if (in_array((string) ($team['id'] ?? ''), $teamIdStr, true)) {
13285|                    foreach ($team['members'] ?? [] as $mid) {
13286|                        $memberIdsInTeams[(int) $mid] = true;
13287|                    }
13288|                }
13289|            }
13290|
13291|            // Supervisor/Gestor de Equipe sem equipe atribuída: ainda deve ver ocorrências onde ??
13292|            // pessoalmente gestor responsável ou pessoa envolvida (regra da planilha SSMA).
13293|            // Sem esse ajuste, memberIdsInTeams ficaria vazio e o filtro de manager_id/people_ids
13294|            // nunca passaria — o supervisor não veria nada, mesmo sendo o responsável da ocorrência.
13295|            if ($occurrenceTeamFilterIds === [] && ($ssmaIsTagTeamSupervisor || $ssmaIsTagTeamGestor)) {
13296|                $selfMember = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
13297|                $selfMemberId = (int) ($selfMember?->getId() ?? 0);
13298|                if ($selfMemberId > 0) {
13299|                    $memberIdsInTeams[$selfMemberId] = true;
13300|                }
13301|            }
13302|
13303|            // Ocorrências: por team_id direto OU por manager_id/people_ids/responsible_ids pertencente ?? equipe.
13304|            // Supervisor de Equipe deve ver ocorrências onde ?? gestor responsável ou pessoa envolvida,
13305|            // mesmo que o team_id da ocorrência não esteja preenchido ou difira do escopo.
13306|            $viewerMemberIdForCreated = (int) ($this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user instanceof User ? $user : null)?->getId() ?? 0);
13307|            $occurrences = array_values(array_filter($occurrences, static function (array $o) use ($teamIdStr, $memberIdsInTeams, $viewerMemberIdForCreated): bool {
13308|                if (isset($o['team_id']) && $o['team_id'] !== null && in_array((string) $o['team_id'], $teamIdStr, true)) {
13309|                    return true;
13310|                }
13311|                if ($viewerMemberIdForCreated > 0 && (int) ($o['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0) === $viewerMemberIdForCreated) {
13312|                    return true;
13313|                }
13314|                $managerId = (int) ($o['manager_id'] ?? 0);
13315|                if ($managerId > 0 && isset($memberIdsInTeams[$managerId])) {
13316|                    return true;
13317|                }
13318|                $personId = (int) ($o['person_id'] ?? 0);
13319|                if ($personId > 0 && isset($memberIdsInTeams[$personId])) {
13320|                    return true;
13321|                }
13322|                foreach (array_merge((array) ($o['people_ids'] ?? []), (array) ($o['responsible_ids'] ?? [])) as $p) {
13323|                    if (isset($memberIdsInTeams[(int) $p])) {
13324|                        return true;
13325|                    }
13326|                }
13327|                return false;
13328|            }));
13329|
13330|            // Inspeções: por team_id
13331|            $inspections = array_values(array_filter($inspections, static function (array $i) use ($teamIdStr): bool {
13332|                $tid = $i['team_id'] ?? null;
13333|                return $tid !== null && $tid !== '' && in_array((string) $tid, $teamIdStr, true);
13334|            }));
13335|
13336|            // Abordagens: por observador pertencente ?? equipe
13337|            $abordagens = array_values(array_filter($abordagens, static function (array $ab) use ($memberIdsInTeams): bool {
13338|                $obsId = (int) ($ab['observador_id'] ?? 0);
13339|                return $obsId > 0 && isset($memberIdsInTeams[$obsId]);
13340|            }));
13341|
13342|            // Plano de Ação: ações em que pelo menos um responsável pertence ao escopo da equipe
13343|            // (não todas as ações das ocorrências visíveis da equipe).
13344|            $actionsTaken = $this->filterActionsByResponsibleMemberIds($actionsTaken, $memberIdsInTeams);
13345|        }
13346|
13347|        if ($occurrenceAreaFilterIds !== null) {
13348|            $areaMemberIds = $areaScope->allowedMemberIds();
13349|            // Equipe com área fora do recorte esconde a inspeção mesmo com participante interno:
13350|            // é o que mantém a interseção quando team_limitation e area_limitation estão juntos.
13351|            $inspections = SsmaAreaLimitationScope::filterInspectionsForAreaScope(
13352|                $inspections,
13353|                $areaScope->allowedTeamIds(),
13354|                $areaMemberIds,
13355|                $areaScope->teamIdsWithoutArea()
13356|            );
13357|            $abordagens = SsmaAreaLimitationScope::filterAbordagensByMemberIds(
13358|                $abordagens,
13359|                $areaMemberIds
13360|            );
13361|            // Mesmo critério da limitação de equipe: plano de ação só com responsável no recorte.
13362|            $actionsTaken = $this->filterActionsByResponsibleMemberIds($actionsTaken, $areaMemberIds);
13363|        }
13364|
13365|        // Técnico especialista: filtra ocorrências pelos tipos que têm autorização técnica (SsmaPermissionTagMember).
13366|        // Inspeções/Abordagens/Ações não são filtradas por equipe; o técnico não tem equipe SSMA atribuída.
13367|        if ($isTechSpecialistOnly) {
13368|            $techTypesSet = array_flip($userTechnicalTypes);
13369|            $occurrences = array_values(array_filter(
13370|                $occurrences,
13371|                static fn (array $o): bool => isset($techTypesSet[$o['type_value'] ?? ''])
13372|            ));
13373|        }
13374|
13375|        // Filtro de membro (próprio conteúdo) apenas quando o usuário NÃO tem escopo de equipe.
13376|        // Supervisor/Gestor de Equipe já foram limitados pelo filtro de equipe acima — aplicar o
13377|        // filtro de membro sobre eles reduziria a visão incorretamente para só o próprio conteúdo.
13378|        $ssmaPreventionInspectionEnabled = true;
13379|        $ssmaPreventionAbordagemEnabled  = true;
13380|
13381|        // Abas Inspeção/Abordagem (ROLE_USER): só quando meta do kind > 0 (igual critério da tabela Metas).
13382|        // - Sem row (nunca adicionado ou removido com lixeira) → abas ocultas.
13383|        // - Meta = -1 (desligado para esse kind) → aba oculta.
13384|        // - Meta >= 0 (ligado, mesmo sem goal definido ainda) → aba visível.
13385|        // Supervisores/Gestores de Equipe e Gestor Administrador são excluídos desse controle: suas abas dependem de outras flags.
13386|        if ($company && $user instanceof User
13387|            && !$this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN')
13388|            && !$this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER')
13389|            && !$this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR')) {
13390|            $memberForPreventionTabs = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
13391|            $memberIdPreventionTabs = (int) ($memberForPreventionTabs?->getId() ?? 0);
13392|            if ($memberIdPreventionTabs > 0) {
13393|                $metaKeyTabs = self::PREVENCAO_MEMBER_META_PREFIX . $memberIdPreventionTabs;
13394|                $memberMetaRowTabs = $this->entityManager->getRepository(SsmaMeta::class)
13395|                    ->findOneBy(['company' => $company, 'teamName' => $metaKeyTabs]);
13396|                // Le os valores de meta da linha encontrada (null quando a linha nao existe).
13397|                // Aba visível quando o membro está na tabela (row existe) e esse kind não está desligado (-1).
13398|                // meta=0 (ligado sem goal definido) → aba visível; meta=-1 (desligado) → aba oculta.
13399|                $isMgmtPreventionProfile = $this->ssmaPreventionHubAccessService
13400|                    ->isManagementPreventionTag($ssmaPreventionProductTagName)
13401|                    || $this->ssmaPreventionHubAccessService->isManagementPreventionTag($ssmaProductTagName);
13402|                $isPlainPreventionMember = $this->ssmaPreventionHubAccessService
13403|                    ->isPlainPreventionMemberTag($ssmaPreventionProductTagName);
13404|
13405|                if ($isMgmtPreventionProfile) {
13406|                    // Supervisores e Gestores visualizam todos os kinds independente da meta individual.
13407|                    // O campo meta=-1 (desligado) serve para Membros; nao deve ocultar abas de gestao.
13408|                    $ssmaPreventionInspectionEnabled = true;
13409|                    $ssmaPreventionAbordagemEnabled = true;
13410|                } elseif ($isPlainPreventionMember) {
13411|                    if ($memberMetaRowTabs !== null) {
13412|                        $ssmaPreventionInspectionEnabled = $this->ssmaPreventionHubAccessService
13413|                            ->isPrevencaoMemberKindTabVisible($memberMetaRowTabs->getMetaInspecao());
13414|                        $ssmaPreventionAbordagemEnabled = $this->ssmaPreventionHubAccessService
13415|                            ->isPrevencaoMemberKindTabVisible($memberMetaRowTabs->getMetaAbordagem());
13416|                    } else {
13417|                        $ssmaPreventionInspectionEnabled = false;
13418|                        $ssmaPreventionAbordagemEnabled = false;
13419|                    }
13420|                }
13421|            } else {
13422|                // Membro não encontrado: oculta ambas as abas por segurança.
13423|                $ssmaPreventionInspectionEnabled = false;
13424|                $ssmaPreventionAbordagemEnabled  = false;
13425|            }
13426|        }
13427|
13428|        if ($company instanceof Company
13429|            && !$this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN')
13430|            && !$this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER')
13431|            && !$this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR')
13432|            && !$this->ssmaPreventionHubAccessService->companyHasPreventionMetasBootstrap($company)) {
13433|            $ssmaPreventionInspectionEnabled = false;
13434|            $ssmaPreventionAbordagemEnabled = false;
13435|            $ssmaCanAccessPreventionPanelAndMetas = false;
13436|        }
13437|
13438|        // Colaborador com meta, supervisor ou perfil equivalente: registrar o próprio conteúdo.
13439|        // Gestor cria para outros; supervisor/membro só o próprio (ssmaPreventionMutateOwnOnly).
13440|        // Inclui Supervisor/Gestor de Área via canMutatePreventionContentForCurrentUser.
13441|        if ($company && $user instanceof User) {
13442|            $canMutateOwnInspection = $ssmaPreventionInspectionEnabled
13443|                && $this->canMutatePreventionContentForCurrentUser($company, $user, 'inspecao');
13444|            $canMutateOwnAbordagem = $ssmaPreventionAbordagemEnabled
13445|                && $this->canMutatePreventionContentForCurrentUser($company, $user, 'abordagem');
13446|
13447|            if ($canMutateOwnInspection || $canMutateOwnAbordagem) {
13448|                $ssmaCanCreatePreventionItems = true;
13449|                $ssmaCanEditPreventionContent = true;
13450|            }
13451|        }
13452|
13453|        if ($company && $user instanceof User
13454|            && $ssmaCanEditPreventionContent
13455|            && !$this->canManageAllPreventionContentForCurrentUser($company, $user)
13456|        ) {
13457|            $ssmaPreventionMutateOwnOnly = true;
13458|        }
13459|
13460|        $loggedPreventionMemberId = ($company && $user instanceof User)
13461|            ? (int) ($this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user)?->getId() ?? 0)
13462|            : 0;
13463|        $loggedPreventionUserId = $user instanceof User ? (int) $user->getId() : 0;
13464|        if ($ssmaCanEditPreventionContent) {
13465|            foreach ($inspections as $inspIdx => $inspRow) {
13466|                if (!is_array($inspRow)) {
13467|                    continue;
13468|                }
13469|                $inspections[$inspIdx]['can_mutate'] = !$ssmaPreventionMutateOwnOnly
13470|                    || $this->preventionArrayOwnedByMember($inspRow, $loggedPreventionMemberId, $loggedPreventionUserId);
13471|            }
13472|            foreach ($abordagens as $abIdx => $abRow) {
13473|                if (!is_array($abRow)) {
13474|                    continue;
13475|                }
13476|                $abordagens[$abIdx]['can_mutate'] = !$ssmaPreventionMutateOwnOnly
13477|                    || $this->preventionArrayOwnedByMember($abRow, $loggedPreventionMemberId, $loggedPreventionUserId);
13478|            }
13479|        }
13480|
13481|        if (!$this->canManageSsmaOccurrences()
13482|            && !$ssmaIsTagTeamSupervisor
13483|            && !$ssmaIsTagAreaSupervisor
13484|            && $ssmaProductTagName !== SsmaAreaLimitationScope::TAG_GESTOR_AREA
13485|            && !$this->memberIsSsmaGestorAdministrador($company && $user instanceof User ? $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user) : null)
13486|            && $occurrenceTeamFilterIds === null
13487|            && $occurrenceAreaFilterIds === null
13488|            && !$isTechSpecialistOnly) {
13489|            $currentMember = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
13490|            $currentMemberId = $currentMember?->getId() ?? 0;
13491|
13492|            $occurrences = $this->filterOccurrencesForMember($occurrences, $currentMemberId, $company);
13493|            if ($company instanceof Company && $user instanceof User && $currentMemberId > 0) {
13494|                $occurrences = $this->appendMissingActionLinkedOccurrences(
13495|                    $occurrences,
13496|                    $currentMemberId,
13497|                    $company,
13498|                    $user
13499|                );
13500|                $occurrences = $this->appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser($occurrences, $company, $user);
13501|            }
13502|            $actionsTaken = $this->filterActionsForMember($actionsTaken, $occurrences, $currentMemberId);
13503|        } elseif ($company instanceof Company && $user instanceof User
13504|            && ($occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== null || $occurrenceAreaFilterIds !== null)
13505|        ) {
13506|            $occurrences = $this->appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser($occurrences, $company, $user);
13507|        }
13508|
13509|        // Membro/Inspetor (pessoa física): na Prevenção Ativa só vê inspeções/abordagens em que está relacionado.
13510|        // O filtro por equipe nas ocorrências não deve listar inspeções da equipe inteira para esses perfis.
13511|        // Aura/tenant/SUPER_ADMIN com tag Membro herdada NÃO entram aqui — senão o admin vê
13512|        // só o próprio conteúdo (ex.: 2 inspeções) enquanto o Gestor de Área vê o recorte da gerência (3).
13513|        if ($company && $user instanceof User && $ssmaIsPlainPreventionMember) {
13514|            $plainMemberId = (int) ($this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user)?->getId() ?? 0);
13515|            $plainUserId = (int) $user->getId();
13516|            $inspections = array_values(array_filter(
13517|                $inspections,
13518|                fn (array $row): bool => $this->preventionArrayOwnedByMember($row, $plainMemberId, $plainUserId)
13519|            ));
13520|            $abordagens = array_values(array_filter(
13521|                $abordagens,
13522|                fn (array $row): bool => $this->preventionArrayOwnedByMember($row, $plainMemberId, $plainUserId)
13523|            ));
13524|        }
13525|
13526|        if ($needsPreventionCollections) {
13527|            [$metaFromStr, $metaToStr] = $this->getPrevencaoPeriodDateBounds($metasPeriod);
13528|            [$inspectionsForMetas, $abordagensForMetas] = $this->filterCollectionsForMetasRealizado(
13529|                $inspections,
13530|                $abordagens,
Request #47 deepseek-v4-flash P:50.66K C:938 CR:45.82K CW:0 8640ms
Reasoning
Now, an interesting thing here. In the elseif branch at 13503-13507, `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser` is invoked for users with a team or area scope (e.g., a Supervisor with team filter). This function loads ALL events created by the current user for the company and appends. But does it respect whether the event rows already filtered were of type visibility for created_by_member_id? It maps rows. Fine. Potential duplicate rows: The append adds events not already present (key 'e'.id). OK. One possible issue: It appends events created by current user regardless of `team_id` in the event - so a supervisor could create an event in team A (their scope) then later be reassigned to team B; they'd still see events created in team A (probably intended: "Eventos cadastrados pelo login atual entram na listagem mesmo fora do recorte de equipe.") intended. Another possible bug: The filter in team-scope branch uses `created_by_member_id` compare to viewer member id. But occurrence rows from SQL (legacy SsmaOccurrence, non-events) may not have `created_by_member_id` populated, only created_by_id (user). For these rows, `(int)($o['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0)` will be 0, so only team/person criteria decide. So no broad leak because creator check only applies when member id known. But the elseif branch (team/area scope) is entered for many roles, and appends events created by user. Wait, the elseif branch condition: user has occurrenceTeamFilterIds OR occurrenceAreaFilterIds non-null. This includes managers with team filter. OK. Now look at this filter loop: `$occurrences = array_values(array_filter($occurrences, static function ...))`. Inside static closure references `$viewerMemberIdForCreated` computed. And `$o['created_by_member_id']` present for event rows in the SQL? Where do $occurrences come from? Probably a CTE query that merges events and legacy occurrences. Let me find that big SQL to see if `created_by_member_id` column included. Actually the SQL query building list of occurrences probably is huge CTE. But note confirmed finding 3 says created_by_member_id resolution happens inside mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow, which is for event-by-event mapping. For the SQL loading, we need to verify whether `created_by_member_id` is a column. Let me search for the loadOccurrences function and see how $occurrences built. Search "function loadSsmaOccurrences" or similar. Actually, we've done a lot of exploring. Let's focus on discovering NEW bugs, not repeating confirmed. Let me look at potential new issues: Issue A: `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser` is invoked in the branch where team/area scope applies. But `isSsmaEventVisibleUnderOccurrenceTeamDashboardScope` guard (with new creator shortcut) protects viewing detail; but list append by creator is similar to filtering. Fine. But: This function is also called when the current user is a manager who has team filter? The elseif requires scope filters not null. That means even a manager with team filter sees ALL events they created even if outside scope - consistent with product statement. Issue B: In the elseif branch, when `occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== null || occurrenceAreaFilterIds !== null`. For a supervisor where `occurrenceTeamFilterIds === []` (no team), this elseif is entered because not null, append events created. OK. Now consider the creator shortcut added in `isSsmaEventVisibleUnderOccurrenceTeamDashboardScope` and `filterSsmaOccurrencesForMember` (member id == created_by_member_id). Wait, I need to examine the context around 11677 where created_by_member_id check was added to function that checks "occurrence visible if person is the member". Let me read around 11640-11700.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 11720, "file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 11590}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 11590-11720
11590|        }
11591|
11592|        $tagPm = $memberPm ? $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($memberPm) : null;
11593|
11594|        if (!$this->canManageSsmaOccurrences() || $this->isSsmaViewer()) {
11595|            return false;
11596|        }
11597|        $occurrenceTeamFilterIds = $this->getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds($company, $user);
11598|        $tagNameScoped = null;
11599|        if ($occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== null
11600|            && !$this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN')
11601|            && !$this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER')) {
11602|            $memberScoped = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
11603|            if ($memberScoped) {
11604|                $resolvedScoped = $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($memberScoped);
11605|                $tagNameScoped = $resolvedScoped?->getName();
11606|            }
11607|        }
11608|        if ($tagNameScoped === 'Supervisor de Equipe' || $tagNameScoped === SsmaAreaLimitationScope::TAG_SUPERVISOR_AREA) {
11609|            return false;
11610|        }
11611|
11612|        return $tagPm && in_array($tagPm->getName(), ['Gestor de Equipe', SsmaAreaLimitationScope::TAG_GESTOR_AREA], true);
11613|    }
11614|
11615|    private function canEditSsmaHorasTrabalhadas(): bool
11616|    {
11617|        return $this->canManageSsmaOccurrences() || $this->getSsmaViewerTeamIds() !== null;
11618|    }
11619|
11620|    private function getCurrentCompanyMember(?Company $company, ?User $user): ?CompanyMembers
11621|    {
11622|        if (!$company || !$user) {
11623|            return null;
11624|        }
11625|
11626|        $repo = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class);
11627|        foreach ([false, 0] as $isRemovedValue) {
11628|            $member = $repo->findOneBy([
11629|                'company' => $company,
11630|                'user' => $user,
11631|                'isRemoved' => $isRemovedValue,
11632|            ]);
11633|            if ($member instanceof CompanyMembers) {
11634|                return $member;
11635|            }
11636|        }
11637|
11638|        foreach ($repo->findBy(['company' => $company, 'user' => $user]) as $candidate) {
11639|            if ($candidate instanceof CompanyMembers && (int) $candidate->getIsRemoved() !== 1) {
11640|                return $candidate;
11641|            }
11642|        }
11643|
11644|        return null;
11645|    }
11646|
11647|    private function isActiveCompanyMemberForCompany(?CompanyMembers $member, Company $company): bool
11648|    {
11649|        return $member instanceof CompanyMembers
11650|            && $member->getCompany()?->getId() === $company->getId()
11651|            && (int) $member->getIsRemoved() !== 1;
11652|    }
11653|
11654|  /** @var array<string, true>|null */
11655|    private ?array $occurrenceActionLinkVisibilityCache = null;
11656|
11657|    /** @var array<int, bool> */
11658|    private array $memberIsSsmaGestorAdministradorCache = [];
11659|
11660|    /** @var array<string, int|null> */
11661|    private array $ssmaMemberIdByUserIdCache = [];
11662|
11663|    /** @var array<int, true>|null */
11664|    private ?array $ssmaImmediateLeaderMemberIdsCache = null;
11665|
11666|    private bool $ssmaOccurrencesProductForPermissionResolved = false;
11667|
11668|    private ?\App\Entity\Product $ssmaOccurrencesProductForPermissionCache = null;
11669|
11670|    private function isOccurrenceVisibleToMember(array $occurrence, int $memberId, ?Company $company = null): bool
11671|    {
11672|        if ($memberId <= 0) {
11673|            return false;
11674|        }
11675|
11676|        if ((int) ($occurrence['manager_id'] ?? 0) === $memberId) {
11677|            return true;
11678|        }
11679|
11680|        $createdByMemberId = (int) ($occurrence['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0);
11681|        if ($createdByMemberId <= 0 && $company instanceof Company) {
11682|            $createdByUserId = (int) ($occurrence['created_by_id'] ?? 0);
11683|            if ($createdByUserId > 0) {
11684|                $createdByMemberId = (int) ($this->resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId($company, $createdByUserId) ?? 0);
11685|            }
11686|        }
11687|        if ($createdByMemberId > 0 && $createdByMemberId === $memberId) {
11688|            return true;
11689|        }
11690|
11691|        if ((int) ($occurrence['person_id'] ?? 0) === $memberId) {
11692|            return true;
11693|        }
11694|
11695|        foreach (['people_ids', 'responsible_ids'] as $field) {
11696|            foreach ((array) ($occurrence[$field] ?? []) as $id) {
11697|                if ((int) $id === $memberId) {
11698|                    return true;
11699|                }
11700|            }
11701|        }
11702|
11703|        if ($company instanceof Company && $this->isOccurrenceVisibleViaActionLink($occurrence, $memberId, $company)) {
11704|            return true;
11705|        }
11706|
11707|        return false;
11708|    }
11709|
11710|    /**
11711|     * Executor ou validador de ação vinculada à ocorrência/evento pode abrir o detalhe em leitura.
11712|     *
11713|     * @return array<string, true> chaves "occ_{id}" ou "event_{id}"
11714|     */
11715|    private function getOccurrenceActionLinkVisibilityKeys(int $memberId, Company $company): array
11716|    {
11717|        if ($memberId <= 0) {
11718|            return [];
11719|        }
11720|
Request #48 deepseek-v4-flash P:53.23K C:944 CR:51.58K CW:0 8459ms
Reasoning
Now the `filterSsmaOccurrencesForMember` — wait, this function is `isOccurrenceVisibleToMember` which now adds creator shortcut. That enables a plain member to see occurrences they created — but previously? Actually if member created an event on behalf of manager with `manager_id`=leader, the plain member wouldn't see it because manager_id isn't the member. So the change intentionally lets them see their own registered events. Potential subtle leak: `resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId` only returns active memberships (`isRemoved=0`). If the creator has been removed from company (isRemoved=1), resolution returns null, so the check fails. The member could no longer log in anyway (removed member maybe no access). Fine. Now let me focus on the deeper logic. Let me examine new `applySsmaEventManagerAssignment` and how it interacts with validation for an EDIT path and for the case of an event where a manager (canSelect) requests manager from area scope but assignment scope only team filter (confirmed finding #2). Also consider: `applySsmaEventManagerAssignment` uses `$data['details']['manager_id']` and requested values. But there's a subtlety about the source of `manager_id` in the payload. When submitting, details.manager_id may come from the JS. For plain member, the select is disabled and its value set to own leader id, then payload includes manager_id. If own leader not in gestoresList? Wait - `buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions` always adds own leader to keep so options include it. Good. But if the user has NO superior (leader null) AND cannot change, the select is disabled but no default; field is disabled, and required attr? `required` set when gestoresList length >0. If leader null then manager_id not in select; required field with no value → HTML5 required validation blocks submit unless JS handles disabled select (disabled fields aren't submitted!). Hmm. Since the select is disabled (member cannot change), if a default manager is present it's submitted? Disabled form controls are NOT submitted with the form. But this form is submitted via JS (Ajax) which likely reads value via jQuery/JS, not via normal form submit. Since disabled field remains selectable via .val() and JS serialization of the offcanvas form probably reads values via jQuery .val() or `$('#ev_manager').val()`, disabled doesn't matter for jQuery val. Let me not go too deep without reading JS in modal. But confirmed finding 1 already covers supervisor without superior → blocked scenario. Let me examine the modal JS more to find an actual bug. In `_modal_event.html.twig`, changes: - `ssmaCanChangeEventManager = ssma_can_change_event_manager|default(false) or ssmaIsTenantAdminUser` => server computed plus tenant admin. - window.SSMA_CAN_CHANGE_EVENT_MANAGER set. - select `disabled` attribute when not can change. - initSearchableMemberField only when can change. - evSyncReportedByFieldForType rewritten. Now, one concern: `ssma_can_change_event_manager` is passed as `'ssma_can_change_event_manager' => $ssmaCanChangeEventManager` from controller only at that big data build (index/occurrence listing). But the modal is included in other contexts too (e.g., the occurrence detail "novo evento"?). Let's find all places `_modal_event.html.twig` is included, and whether `ssma_can_change_event_manager` is always defined. Using default(false) safe. Actually, since `ssma_can_change_event_manager` is used with `|default(false)` in template, no error if missing. But semantics: If the variable missing in some include context where user IS allowed to change manager, field would be disabled erroneously. Where is `_modal_event.html.twig` included? Probably inside occurrence_view (which receives all these computed flags) and maybe the plan's index. Let's search where the modal is included.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "_modal_event.html.twig"}
File: .opencodereview/rule.json
Match lines: 2
86|      "path": "templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig",
96|      "path": "templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig",

File: .opencodereview/rules/ssma/occurrence-descaracter-suspeita-card.md
Match lines: 1
6|- `templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig` — `evSyncDescaracterStageUi`, `evCreateInjuredPersonCard`, `evRenderInjuredPersonBoxes`, CSS `.ev-inj-descaracter*`

File: .opencodereview/rules/ssma/occurrence-ros-aprofundamento-readonly.md
Match lines: 2
7|- `templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig` — `EvModal.openAprofundamento`, `evAprofundamentoCanEditFromServer`, `evCanEditAprofundamento`, `evSetAprofundamentoReadonly`
35|**Modal (`_modal_event.html.twig`):**

File: CONFLITOS_REAIS_DYNAMIC_COLOR_ICONS.md
Match lines: 1
152|- `templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig` ✅

File: docs/engineering/pr/feature-ssma-ocorrencia-correcoes-new-production/PR_descricao_feature-ssma-ocorrencia-correcoes-new-production.md
Match lines: 1
29|- `occurrence_view.html.twig`, `_tab_occurrences.html.twig`, `_modal_event.html.twig` — Readequação, validação, suspeita/caracterizar só para médico (`.is-doctor-aprof`), Reprovar com cor da plataforma

File: docs/engineering/pr/homolog/PR_arquivos_homolog.txt
Match lines: 1
71|M	templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig

File: docs/engineering/pr/homolog/PR_impacto_homolog.txt
Match lines: 1
71| .../occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig     |  54 +++-

File: docs/engineering/pr/hotfix-ssma-ambiental-material-brenda-new-production/PR_descricao_hotfix-ssma-ambiental-material-brenda-new-production.md
Match lines: 2
41|- Formulário compartilhado `_modal_event.html.twig` — listagem e detalhe.
84|| `_modal_event.html.twig` | AA nativo, barreiras, consequências, AP, ROS/QA, exclusão envolvido/testemunha |

File: docs/engineering/pr/hotfix-ssma-ap-validacao-etapa1-new-production/PR_arquivos_hotfix-ssma-ap-validacao-etapa1-new-production.txt
Match lines: 1
225|M	templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig

File: docs/engineering/pr/hotfix-ssma-ap-validacao-etapa1-new-production/PR_descricao_hotfix-ssma-ap-validacao-etapa1-new-production.md
Match lines: 1
45|| `_modal_event.html.twig` | Etapa 1 não envia campos técnicos para Membro; botão **Registrar**; validação só do passo ativo; labels humanizadas nos toasts |

File: docs/engineering/pr/hotfix-ssma-ap-validacao-etapa1-new-production/PR_impacto_hotfix-ssma-ap-validacao-etapa1-new-production.txt
Match lines: 1
225| .../occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig     | 1821 ++++++++----

File: docs/engineering/pr/hotfix-ssma-occ-type-perms-datatables-new-production/PR_arquivos_hotfix-ssma-occ-type-perms-datatables-new-production.txt
Match lines: 1
7|M	templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig

File: docs/engineering/pr/hotfix-ssma-occ-type-perms-datatables-new-production/PR_descricao_hotfix-ssma-occ-type-perms-datatables-new-production.md
Match lines: 2
36|- Formulário compartilhado `_modal_event.html.twig` (create/update de ocorrências e aprofundamento).
93|| `templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig` | `EvModal.openAprofundamento`, botões rascunho/finalizar, payload `aprofundamento_only` |

File: docs/engineering/pr/hotfix-ssma-occ-type-perms-datatables-new-production/PR_impacto_hotfix-ssma-occ-type-perms-datatables-new-production.txt
Match lines: 1
7| .../occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig     | 146 ++++++-

File: docs/engineering/pr/hotfix-ssma-ros-barrier-type-422/PR_descricao_hotfix-ssma-ros-barrier-type-422.md
Match lines: 1
50|| Flash report | `occurrence_view.html.twig`, `_modal_event.html.twig`, `_tab_config.html.twig`, `new_automation.html.twig` |

File: docs/engineering/pr/hotfix-ssma-ux-pos-merge-231-new-production/PR_arquivos_hotfix-ssma-ux-pos-merge-231-new-production.txt
Match lines: 1
7|M	templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig

File: docs/engineering/pr/hotfix-ssma-ux-pos-merge-231-new-production/PR_impacto_hotfix-ssma-ux-pos-merge-231-new-production.txt
Match lines: 1
7| .../occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig     |  35 +-

File: docs/engineering/pr/new_staging2/PR_arquivos_new_staging2.txt
Match lines: 1
1631|M	templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig

File: docs/engineering/pr/new_staging2/PR_impacto_new_staging2.txt
Match lines: 1
1631| .../occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig     |  162 +-

File: docs/logs/engineering/frontend_console_inventory.md
Match lines: 1
794|| templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig | templates | nao | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

File: docs/pr-hotfix-ssma-ap-parte-medica-new-production.md
Match lines: 1
25|| Alterado | `templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig` |

File: docs/ssma/ALINHAMENTO-TITULO-OPCIONAL-E-MEMBROS-SEM-ADMIN.md
Match lines: 2
229|- UI: `_modal_event.html.twig` — esconder `#ev-gravity-wrap` nos tipos com `#ev_consequence`; mostrar badge/read-only de gravidade no bloco de classificação técnica.
269|- UI: `_modal_event.html.twig` — opções de `#ev_work_leave` + filtro/auto-select do select de classificação ao mudar afastamento.

File: docs/ssma/CORRECOES-FECHAMENTO-FIGMA-PENDENTES.md
Match lines: 3
38|**Onde:** `templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig` (`ev_datetime`, `evDefaultDatetimeToday`).
95|| 3 | `_modal_event.html.twig` |
97|| 5 | `_modal_event.html.twig`, `SsmaController.php`, `SsmaEventValidator.php` |

File: docs/ssma/CORRECOES-OCORRENCIA-FIGMA-PARTE-2.md
Match lines: 1
46|- UI: `_modal_event.html.twig` / `_modal_occurrence.html.twig` (`SSMA_IS_AURA_ADMIN`, hide na criação).

File: docs/ssma/PAINEL-OCORRENCIAS-INDICADORES-PLANO.md
Match lines: 1
377|| Classificação FAC/LTI/RWC/MTC | `_modal_event.html.twig` → `#ev_injury_classification`; persistido em `SsmaEvent.details.injury_classification` |

File: docs/ssma/PRODUTO_SSMA_MAPA_COMPLETO.md
Match lines: 2
199|3. No offcanvas **Evento SSMA** (`_modal_event.html.twig`): escolher tipo (ROS, Quase acidente, Acidente pessoal/material/ambiental).
219|| Criar/editar evento | `_modal_event.html.twig` |

File: docs/ssma/engineering/ssma-permissoes-ocorrencia-auditoria-2026-09.md
Match lines: 1
226|`_modal_event.html.twig` / JS do modal antes de mudar o código de resposta.

File: docs/ssma/ocorrencia-01-colab-acidentado-pessoas-envolvidas.md
Match lines: 1
21|| Filtro do select | `evFilterInjuredPersonSelect()` em `_modal_event.html.twig` |

File: templates/ssma/occurrence/index.html.twig
Match lines: 1
114|    {% include 'ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig' with {

File: templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig
Match lines: 1
1313|    {% include 'ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig' with {

File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_occurrence.html.twig
Match lines: 1
2|{# Modal legado (listagem/detalhe). Fluxo principal de registro: _modal_event.html.twig (offcanvas tipado). #}

File: templates/ssma/occurrence/tabs/_tab_occurrences.html.twig
Match lines: 1
1891|    // ── Open "Nova ocorrência" offcanvas (implementação em _modal_event.html.twig) ──

File: templates/ssma/partials/_ssma_body_map_entry.html.twig
Match lines: 1
9|  - occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig  → Novo evento / edição

File: tests/Ssma/ValidateLocalFixesTest.php
Match lines: 2
18| *   2. _modal_event.html.twig       — todos os <option value> batem com EnvironmentalMediumEnum
87|        // Exatamente as <option value="..."> de _modal_event.html.twig para ACIDENTE_AMBIENTAL

File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaBodyMapEntryRegressionTest.php
Match lines: 1
46|        $modal = $this->read('templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig');

File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/assert_branch_ui_fixes.php
Match lines: 2
40|$modal = $root . '/templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig';
201|$modalEvent = $root . '/templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig';

File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/assert_flash_report_flow.php
Match lines: 1
140|$modalEvent = $root . '/templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig';

code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "ssma_can_change_event_manager"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
13680|                'ssma_can_change_event_manager' => $ssmaCanChangeEventManager,

File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig
Match lines: 4
50|        {% set ssmaCanChangeEventManager = ssma_can_change_event_manager|default(false) or ssmaIsTenantAdminUser %}
56|        window.SSMA_CAN_CHANGE_EVENT_MANAGER = {{ ssmaCanChangeEventManager ? 'true' : 'false' }};
4312|        if (typeof shared.initSearchableMemberField === 'function' && window.SSMA_CAN_CHANGE_EVENT_MANAGER) {
5255|        var canChange = !!window.SSMA_CAN_CHANGE_EVENT_MANAGER;

Request #49 deepseek-v4-flash P:57.09K C:603 CR:54.14K CW:0 5618ms
Reasoning
The modal is included both in index.html.twig and occurrence_view.html.twig. Both get data from the controller that includes `ssma_can_change_event_manager` in its data? The controller adds it in one view-data build at line 13680 (which seems to be the listing/index build). For occurrence_view (detail page) the data passed at line 1313 include variables like `allMembers`, `teams`, `occurrence`, `gestores`, etc. Does the detail view data include `ssma_can_change_event_manager`? Let's look at what variables the detail view passes and whether the controller provides `ssma_can_change_event_manager` there. In the detail view (kind=event), modal is included with many variables. Search for how the detail controller sets up those variables and whether ssma_can_change_event_manager is among them. Since the template uses `ssma_can_change_event_manager|default(false)`, if the variable isn't defined, tenant admin fallback via `ssmaIsTenantAdminUser` computed from roles still works (ROLE_TENANT granted). But for a Gestor de Equipe or Gestor Administrador on the detail page, the flag would default to false, disabling the manager select in the modal for editing an event on detail view! That would be a functional inconsistency: on the detail page, editing an event as a Gestor de Equipe wouldn't allow changing the manager while on listing would. But is `ssma_is_gestor_user` present in detail too? In detail view, when editing an event (kind=event), the modal's `ev_manager` select would need to be enabled to change. The flag default false in detail => disabled. That seems a real regression candidate but requires verifying what variables the detail controller passes to the template. Let me read occurrence_view.html.twig line ~1313 include and its context to see the variables list, and check where controller renders this view with what variables. Let me look at the include statement region in occurrence_view.html.twig (lines ~1300-1340).
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig", "start_line": 1290, "end_line": 1360}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig (Total lines: 3231)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1290-1360
1290|            deadline: '__ACTION_DEADLINE__',
1291|            solved: false,
1292|            has_project: false,
1293|            project_url: '',
1294|            project_start_date: '',
1295|            project_priority: '',
1296|            responsible_ids: []
1297|        },
1298|        responsible_members: []
1299|    } only %}
1300|</template>
1301|{% include 'ssma/partials/_modal_action.html.twig' with {
1302|    occurrences: occurrences,
1303|    allMembers: allMembers
1304|} %}
1305|{% include 'ssma/partials/_modal_action_resolution.html.twig' %}
1306|{% include 'ssma/partials/_modal_delete_confirm.html.twig' %}
1307|
1308|{# Offcanvas de edição / aprofundamento — disponível também para especialistas técnicos. #}
1309|{% if can_edit_occurrence|default(false) or show_aprofundamento_btn|default(false) %}
1310|    {% set _membersForModal  = ssma_apply_team_event_scope|default(false) ? all_members_for_event_people|default([]) : allMembers|default([]) %}
1311|    {% set _gestoresForModal = gestores_for_event_modal|default(gestores|default([])) %}
1312|    {% set _teamsForModal    = teams_for_event_modal|default(teams|default([])) %}
1313|    {% include 'ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig' with {
1314|        allMembers: _membersForModal,
1315|        allMembersForMeta: allMembers|default([]),
1316|        gestores: _gestoresForModal,
1317|        teams: _teamsForModal,
1318|        occurrence_type_config: occurrence_type_config|default({ types: [] }),
1319|        ssma_event_form_defaults: ssma_event_form_defaults|default({}),
1320|        user_technical_types: user_technical_types|default([]),
1321|        ssmaCanManageOccurrences: ssmaCanManageOccurrences|default(false),
1322|        ssma_hide_event_title_status_on_create: ssma_hide_event_title_status_on_create|default(false),
1323|        ssmaCanRegisterNewOccurrence: ssmaCanRegisterNewOccurrence|default(false),
1324|        ssmaAllowedCreateTypes: ssmaAllowedCreateTypes|default([]),
1325|        ssmaCanDescharacterizeByType: ssmaCanDescharacterizeByType|default({})
1326|    } %}
1327|    {% if can_edit_occurrence|default(false) %}
1328|    {% include 'ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_occurrence.html.twig' %}
1329|    {% endif %}
1330|{% endif %}
1331|
1332|{# Modal: vincular ação a um plano de ação (detalhe da ocorrência). IDs com prefixo ssmaOccView* para não colidir com #ssmaLinkProjectModal da aba Plano de Ação. #}
1333|<div class="modal fade" id="ssmaOccViewLinkProjectModal" tabindex="-1" role="dialog" aria-labelledby="ssmaOccViewLinkProjectModalLabel" aria-hidden="true">
1334|    <div class="modal-dialog modal-dialog-centered" role="document">
1335|        <div class="modal-content">
1336|            <div class="modal-header">
1337|                <h5 class="modal-title" id="ssmaOccViewLinkProjectModalLabel">
1338|                    <i class="fas fa-link mr-2"></i>Vincular a um plano de ação
1339|                </h5>
1340|                <button type="button" class="close" data-dismiss="modal" aria-label="Fechar">
1341|                    <span aria-hidden="true">&times;</span>
1342|                </button>
1343|            </div>
1344|            <div class="modal-body">
1345|                <div id="ssmaOccViewLinkProjectLoadingState" class="text-center py-3" style="display:none;">
1346|                    <i class="fas fa-spinner fa-spin mr-1"></i> Carregando planos...
1347|                </div>
1348|                <div id="ssmaOccViewLinkProjectContent">
1349|                    <div class="form-group mb-0">
1350|                        <label for="ssmaOccViewLinkProjectSelect">Plano de ação <span class="text-danger">*</span></label>
1351|                        <select class="form-control" id="ssmaOccViewLinkProjectSelect">
1352|                            <option value="" disabled selected>Selecione um plano de ação</option>
1353|                        </select>
1354|                        <small class="text-muted mt-1 d-block">A ação será vinculada ao plano selecionado.</small>
1355|                    </div>
1356|                </div>
1357|            </div>
1358|            <div class="modal-footer">
1359|                <button type="button" class="btn btn-default" data-dismiss="modal">Cancelar</button>
1360|                <button type="button" class="btn btn-primary" id="ssmaOccViewLinkProjectConfirmBtn">
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "templates/ssma/occurrence/index.html.twig", "start_line": 90, "end_line": 140}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/index.html.twig (Total lines: 135)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 90-135
90|        {% include 'ssma/occurrence/tabs/_tab_config.html.twig' with {
91|            occurrence_type_config: occurrence_type_config|default({ types: [] })
92|        } %}
93|    </div>
94|    {% endif %}
95|
96|    {% if ssmaCanManagePermissions|default(false) %}
97|    <div id="tab_oc_permissao_content" class="tab-panel" style="display:none;">
98|        {% include 'ssma/partials/_tab_permissions.html.twig' %}
99|    </div>
100|    {% endif %}
101|
102|    {% include 'ssma/partials/_modal_action.html.twig' with {
103|        occurrences: occurrences|default([]),
104|        allMembers: allMembers|default([]),
105|        action_type_config: action_type_config|default({ types: [] })
106|    } %}
107|    {% include 'ssma/partials/_modal_delete_confirm.html.twig' %}
108|
109|    {# Modais no fim do section — evita espaço fantasma acima do .modern-header sticky #}
110|    {% set _membersForModal  = ssma_apply_team_event_scope|default(false) ? all_members_for_event_people|default([]) : allMembers|default([]) %}
111|    {% set _gestoresForModal = gestores_for_event_modal|default(gestores|default([])) %}
112|    {% set _teamsForModal    = teams_for_event_modal|default(teams|default([])) %}
113|    {% include 'ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_classify.html.twig' %}
114|    {% include 'ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig' with {
115|        allMembers: _membersForModal,
116|        allMembersForMeta: allMembers|default([]),
117|        gestores: _gestoresForModal,
118|        teams: _teamsForModal,
119|        occurrence_type_config: occurrence_type_config|default({ types: [] }),
120|        ssma_event_form_defaults: ssma_event_form_defaults|default({}),
121|        user_technical_types: user_technical_types|default([]),
122|        ssmaCanManageOccurrences: ssmaCanManageOccurrences|default(false),
123|        ssma_hide_event_title_status_on_create: ssma_hide_event_title_status_on_create|default(false),
124|        ssmaCanRegisterNewOccurrence: ssmaCanRegisterNewOccurrence|default(false),
125|        ssmaAllowedCreateTypes: ssmaAllowedCreateTypes|default([]),
126|        ssmaCanDescharacterizeByType: ssmaCanDescharacterizeByType|default({})
127|    } %}
128|</section>
129|{% endblock %}
130|
131|{% block javascripts %}
132|{{ parent() }}
133|{# Botões "+ Evento" / "+ ROS": handler em _tab_occurrences e _modal_event — abre offcanvas tipado #}
134|{% endblock %}
135|
Request #50 deepseek-v4-flash P:59.68K C:672 CR:57.6K CW:0 5969ms
Reasoning
In occurrence_view.html.twig, the include passes only a subset of variables; notably `ssma_can_change_event_manager` is NOT passed. In `index.html.twig` include, also not passed! Wait, but in the controller the data build at line 13680 passes the flag to Twig globals for the template. Let me check where 'ssma_can_change_event_manager' is set in the controller (line 13680), and whether it's part of data array passed to the index render OR as separate variables. Let me look at the view-building function around 13300-13700, in particular how data is returned and whether the occurrence_view detail route gets it. The include in both index and detail only passes some vars but the modal template references variables like `ssma_is_gestor_user`, `ssma_is_pessoa_fisica_comum`, `ssma_hide_event_title_status_on_create` via globals/context. Actually, the modal template at line 43-56 references `ssma_is_gestor_user|default(false)`, `ssma_is_pessoa_fisica_comum|default(false)`, `ssma_can_change_event_manager|default(false)`. These might be defined at top-level controller render (so in context) even if not included in the `with` list of the include. Twig `include ... with {...}` replaces the entire context with only the listed variables unless `only` is used. Neither include uses `only`, so the entire parent context is retained, and the with list just adds/overrides. Since both include calls lack `only`, all existing Twig context variables remain available, including `ssma_can_change_event_manager` (if set at top-level). So detail render must set it at top-level context for it to be available. Now, is the occurrence detail render built by the same function as the listing (that sets ssma_can_change_event_manager at line 13680)? The listing index probably calls `buildOccurrencesViewData` (some big method) that returns data; line 13680 added inside that builder. The detail page probably calls a similar builder (loadOccurrenceListRowsForDetailView etc.). We need to confirm whether the detail route includes this flag. Let me find the route/function that renders occurrence_view.html.twig. Let me search for where `occurrence_view.html.twig` rendered or where data keys like `ssma_event_form_defaults` set. Search 'gestores_for_event_modal' occurrences in controller.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/SsmaController.php"], "search_text": "gestores_for_event_modal"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
13667|                'gestores_for_event_modal' => $gestoresForEventModal,

code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/SsmaController.php"], "search_text": "occurrence_view.html.twig"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
3519|        return $this->render('ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig', array_merge($viewData, [

Request #51 deepseek-v4-flash P:60.46K C:146 CR:60.29K CW:0 2339ms
Reasoning
Let's look at the detail route code around line 3400-3600 to see whether it populates `ssma_event_form_defaults`, `gestores_for_event_modal`, `ssma_can_change_event_manager`, `ssma_is_gestor_user`, etc.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 3580, "file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 3260}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 3260-3580
3260|     */
3261|    private function recalcularStatusRequisito(GovernanceAuthorizationCollaborator $vinculo): void
3262|    {
3263|        $aut       = $vinculo->getGovernanceAuthorization();
3264|        $requisitos = $aut?->getRequisitosList() ?? [];
3265|
3266|        if ($aut && $requisitos !== []) {
3267|            // Verifica se a própria autorização está vencida
3268|            $validadeStr = $aut->getValidade();
3269|            if ($validadeStr) {
3270|                if (preg_match('/^\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2}$/', $validadeStr)) {
3271|                    try {
3272|                        $valDate = new \DateTime($validadeStr);
3273|                        $valDate->setTime(0, 0, 0);
3274|                        if ($valDate < new \DateTime('today')) {
3275|                            $vinculo->setStatusRequisito('expirado');
3276|                            return;
3277|                        }
3278|                    } catch (\Throwable) {
3279|                    }
3280|                } elseif (ctype_digit($validadeStr)) {
3281|                    $dias = (int) $validadeStr;
3282|                    $emitida = $aut->getEmitida();
3283|                    if ($dias > 0 && $emitida !== null) {
3284|                        $expira = (clone \DateTime::createFromInterface($emitida))->modify('+' . $dias . ' days');
3285|                        $expira->setTime(0, 0, 0);
3286|                        if ($expira < new \DateTime('today')) {
3287|                            $vinculo->setStatusRequisito('expirado');
3288|                            return;
3289|                        }
3290|                    }
3291|                }
3292|            }
3293|
3294|            $today     = new \DateTimeImmutable('today');
3295|            $aprovados = [];
3296|            foreach ($vinculo->getDocumentos() as $d) {
3297|                if ($d->getStatus() !== SsmaAutorizacaoDocumento::STATUS_APROVADO) {
3298|                    continue;
3299|                }
3300|                $val = $d->getValidadeDocumento();
3301|                // Documento aprovado só conta se não houver validade ou validade >= hoje
3302|                if ($val === null || \DateTimeImmutable::createFromInterface($val) >= $today) {
3303|                    $aprovados[$d->getRequisitoLabel()] = true;
3304|                }
3305|            }
3306|
3307|            $todos = count(array_intersect_key(array_flip($requisitos), $aprovados)) === count($requisitos);
3308|            $vinculo->setStatusRequisito($todos ? 'valido' : 'pendente');
3309|        }
3310|    }
3311|
3312|    public function viewOccurrence(Request $request, int $id): Response
3313|    {
3314|        if (!$this->canEnterSsmaOperationalArea()) {
3315|            throw $this->createAccessDeniedException('Sem permissão para acessar esta ocorrência.');
3316|        }
3317|
3318|        $viewData = $this->buildSsmaViewData([
3319|            'occurrence_id' => $id,
3320|            'occurrence_kind' => $request->query->get('kind'),
3321|        ]);
3322|        $occurrence = null;
3323|        $occurrenceActions = [];
3324|        $actionTypeLabels = $viewData['action_type_labels'] ?? [];
3325|
3326|        $matching = [];
3327|        foreach ($viewData['occurrences'] as $item) {
3328|            if ((int) ($item['id'] ?? 0) === $id) {
3329|                $matching[] = $item;
3330|            }
3331|        }
3332|
3333|        if ($matching === []) {
3334|            $userForStakeholder = $this->getUser();
3335|            $companyForStakeholder = $userForStakeholder instanceof User ? $userForStakeholder->getCompany() : null;
3336|            $stakeholderRow = ($companyForStakeholder instanceof Company && $userForStakeholder instanceof User)
3337|                ? $this->tryLoadOccurrenceViewRowForActionStakeholder(
3338|                    $id,
3339|                    $request->query->get('kind'),
3340|                    $companyForStakeholder,
3341|                    $userForStakeholder
3342|                )
3343|                : null;
3344|            if ($stakeholderRow !== null) {
3345|                $matching = [$stakeholderRow];
3346|            }
3347|        }
3348|
3349|        if ($matching === []) {
3350|            $approverUser = $this->getUser();
3351|            $approverCompany = $approverUser instanceof User ? $approverUser->getCompany() : null;
3352|            if (
3353|                $approverCompany instanceof Company
3354|                && $approverUser instanceof User
3355|                && $this->canApproveSsmaOccurrence($approverCompany, $approverUser)
3356|            ) {
3357|                foreach ($this->loadOccurrenceListRowsForDetailView(
3358|                    $approverCompany,
3359|                    $id,
3360|                    $viewData['allMembers'] ?? [],
3361|                    $viewData['teams'] ?? []
3362|                ) as $item) {
3363|                    if ((int) ($item['id'] ?? 0) === $id) {
3364|                        $matching[] = $item;
3365|                    }
3366|                }
3367|            }
3368|        }
3369|
3370|        if ($matching === []) {
3371|            $this->addFlash('warning', 'Ocorrência não encontrada.');
3372|
3373|            return $this->redirectToRoute('ssma_ocorrencia_index');
3374|        }
3375|
3376|        $kind = $request->query->get('kind');
3377|        if ($kind === 'event') {
3378|            foreach ($matching as $item) {
3379|                if (($item['is_ssma_event'] ?? false) === true) {
3380|                $occurrence = $item;
3381|                break;
3382|            }
3383|        }
3384|            if ($occurrence === null) {
3385|                $this->addFlash('warning', 'Registro não encontrado.');
3386|
3387|                return $this->redirectToRoute('ssma_ocorrencia_index');
3388|            }
3389|        } else {
3390|            foreach ($matching as $item) {
3391|                if (!($item['is_ssma_event'] ?? false)) {
3392|                    $occurrence = $item;
3393|                    break;
3394|                }
3395|            }
3396|            if ($occurrence === null) {
3397|                $occurrence = $matching[0];
3398|            }
3399|        }
3400|
3401|        $isSsmaEventRow = (bool) ($occurrence['is_ssma_event'] ?? false);
3402|        $user    = $this->getUser();
3403|        $company = $user instanceof User ? $user->getCompany() : null;
3404|        $this->maybeAutoFinalizeOccurrenceRowIfAllActionsClosed($occurrence, $company);
3405|        $this->syncOccurrenceRowStatusFromDatabase($occurrence, $company);
3406|
3407|        $today = new \DateTimeImmutable('today');
3408|        foreach ($viewData['actions_taken'] as $actionItem) {
3409|            if ($isSsmaEventRow) {
3410|                if ((int) ($actionItem['event_id'] ?? 0) !== $id) {
3411|                    continue;
3412|                }
3413|            } elseif ((int) ($actionItem['occurrence_id'] ?? 0) !== $id) {
3414|                continue;
3415|            }
3416|            $occurrenceActions[] = $this->enrichOccurrenceViewActionCard($actionItem, $actionTypeLabels, $today);
3417|        }
3418|
3419|        $history = $occurrence['history'] ?? [];
3420|        if (($occurrence['is_ssma_event'] ?? false) === true) {
3421|            $eventEntity = $this->entityManager->getRepository(SsmaEvent::class)->find($id);
3422|            if ($eventEntity instanceof SsmaEvent && $company && $eventEntity->getCompany()->getId() === $company->getId()) {
3423|                foreach ($eventEntity->getHistory() as $hItem) {
3424|                    if (is_array($hItem)) {
3425|                        $history[] = $hItem;
3426|                    }
3427|                }
3428|            }
3429|        } else {
3430|            // Mescla o changelog de auditoria (tipo, gravidade) armazenado em details
3431|            $occurrenceEntity = $this->entityManager->getRepository(SsmaOccurrence::class)->find($id);
3432|            if ($occurrenceEntity instanceof SsmaOccurrence) {
3433|                $changelog = $occurrenceEntity->getDetails()['changelog'] ?? [];
3434|                foreach ($changelog as $cItem) {
3435|                    if (is_array($cItem) && isset($cItem['message'])) {
3436|                        $history[] = $cItem;
3437|                    }
3438|                }
3439|            }
3440|        }
3441|        foreach ($occurrenceActions as $actionItem) {
3442|            $createdAt = (string) ($actionItem['created_at'] ?? '');
3443|            $title = trim((string) ($actionItem['title'] ?? ''));
3444|            if ($createdAt !== '' && $title !== '') {
3445|                $history[] = [
3446|                    'date' => (new \DateTimeImmutable($createdAt))->format('d/m/Y'),
3447|                    'label' => 'Ação criada: ' . $title,
3448|                ];
3449|            }
3450|        }
3451|        // Ordena do mais recente para o mais antigo (data mais recente no topo do histórico).
3452|        usort($history, function (array $a, array $b): int {
3453|            return $this->occurrenceHistoryEntryTimestamp($b) <=> $this->occurrenceHistoryEntryTimestamp($a);
3454|        });
3455|        $occurrence['history'] = $history;
3456|
3457|        $occurrence = $this->filterOccurrenceEvidencesForCurrentUser($occurrence, false);
3458|
3459|        $occurrence = $this->enrichOccurrenceEvidencesForView($occurrence);
3460|
3461|        if (($occurrence['is_ssma_event'] ?? false) === true && $company instanceof Company) {
3462|            $eventEntity = $this->entityManager->getRepository(SsmaEvent::class)->find($id);
3463|            if ($eventEntity instanceof SsmaEvent && $eventEntity->getCompany()->getId() === $company->getId()) {
3464|                $flash = $eventEntity->getDetails()['flash_report'] ?? [];
3465|                $occurrence['flash_report'] = is_array($flash) ? $flash : [];
3466|                if ($user instanceof User) {
3467|                    $this->maybeSubmitOccurrenceForValidation($eventEntity, $company, $user);
3468|                }
3469|                $occurrence['occurrence_approval'] = $this->ssmaOccurrenceApprovalService->getState($eventEntity);
3470|                $details = $eventEntity->getDetails();
3471|                if (is_array($details)) {
3472|                    $occurrence['work_leave'] = (string) ($details['work_leave'] ?? $occurrence['work_leave'] ?? '');
3473|                    $occurrence['injury_classification'] = (string) ($details['injury_classification'] ?? $occurrence['injury_classification'] ?? '');
3474|                }
3475|            }
3476|        }
3477|
3478|        $occurrence['work_leave_label'] = $this->ssmaReportWorkLeaveLabel($occurrence['work_leave'] ?? '');
3479|        $occurrence['injury_classification_label'] = $this->ssmaReportInjuryClassificationLabel(
3480|            (string) ($occurrence['injury_classification'] ?? '')
3481|        );
3482|        // Mesma escala do formulário (Leve/Baixo/Médio/Alto/Severo) — não o slug 4 níveis (grave).
3483|        $occurrence['gravity_label'] = $this->resolveSsmaOccurrenceGravityLabel($occurrence);
3484|        $potSevRaw = trim((string) ($occurrence['potential_severity'] ?? ''));
3485|        if ($potSevRaw !== '') {
3486|            $occurrence['potential_severity_label'] = $this->ssmaReportPotentialSeverityLabel($potSevRaw);
3487|        }
3488|
3489|        $canSubmitFlashReport = false;
3490|        $canDirectSendFlashReport = false;
3491|        if (($occurrence['is_ssma_event'] ?? false) === true && $company instanceof Company && $user instanceof User) {
3492|            $flashPerms = $this->resolveSsmaFlashReportUiPermissions(
3493|                $company,
3494|                $user,
3495|                [],
3496|                (bool) ($viewData['ssma_is_gestor_user'] ?? false)
3497|            );
3498|            $canSubmitFlashReport = $flashPerms['can_submit'];
3499|            $canDirectSendFlashReport = $flashPerms['can_direct_send'];
3500|        }
3501|
3502|        // Responsável da área / do local (mapa location_responsibles + fallback CompanyArea por nome).
3503|        if ($company instanceof Company) {
3504|            $occurrence = $this->enrichOccurrenceAreaResponsible($occurrence, $company, $viewData['allMembers'] ?? []);
3505|        }
3506|
3507|        // Cards de aprofundamento técnico do tipo (ROS / Quase Acidente / acidentes).
3508|        $occurrenceTypeKey = (string) ($occurrence['type_value'] ?? '');
3509|        $occurrenceTechTags = [];
3510|        foreach ($viewData['ssma_perm_tags'] ?? [] as $tagRow) {
3511|            if (!is_array($tagRow)) {
3512|                continue;
3513|            }
3514|            if ((string) ($tagRow['occurrence_type_key'] ?? '') === $occurrenceTypeKey) {
3515|                $occurrenceTechTags[] = $tagRow;
3516|            }
3517|        }
3518|
3519|        return $this->render('ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig', array_merge($viewData, [
3520|            'occurrence'         => $occurrence,
3521|            'occurrence_actions' => $occurrenceActions,
3522|            'occurrence_tech_tags' => $occurrenceTechTags,
3523|            'ros_call_priority'  => $viewData['ros_call_priority']
3524|                ?? \App\Service\Ssma\SsmaOccurrenceTypeConfigService::ROS_CALL_PRIORITY_LOCATION_DIRECT,
3525|            'can_aprofundamento' => $this->resolveOccurrenceViewAprofundamentoFlags(
3526|                $occurrence,
3527|                $company,
3528|                $user instanceof User ? $user : null
3529|            ),
3530|            'can_submit_flash_report' => $canSubmitFlashReport,
3531|            'can_direct_send_flash_report' => $canDirectSendFlashReport,
3532|            'can_approve_occurrence' => $this->canApproveSsmaOccurrence($company, $user instanceof User ? $user : null)
3533|                && ($occurrence['is_ssma_event'] ?? false) === true,
3534|            'ssma_flash_report_lazy' => ($occurrence['is_ssma_event'] ?? false) === true,
3535|        ]));
3536|    }
3537|
3538|    /**
3539|     * Flags do botão +Aprofundamento na view da ocorrência.
3540|     *
3541|     * @param array<string, mixed> $occurrence
3542|     *
3543|     * @return array{
3544|     *   show: bool,
3545|     *   pending: bool,
3546|     *   finalized: bool,
3547|     *   can_edit: bool,
3548|     *   is_admin: bool,
3549|     *   validation_ready: bool
3550|     * }
3551|     */
3552|    private function resolveOccurrenceViewAprofundamentoFlags(
3553|        array $occurrence,
3554|        ?Company $company,
3555|        ?User $user
3556|    ): array {
3557|        $empty = [
3558|            'show' => false,
3559|            'pending' => false,
3560|            'finalized' => false,
3561|            'can_edit' => false,
3562|            'is_admin' => false,
3563|            'validation_ready' => true,
3564|        ];
3565|        if (!$company || !$user || empty($occurrence['is_ssma_event'])) {
3566|            return $empty;
3567|        }
3568|
3569|        $type = strtoupper(trim((string) ($occurrence['type_value'] ?? $occurrence['type'] ?? '')));
3570|        $requires = in_array($type, ['ROS', 'QUASE_ACIDENTE', 'ACIDENTE_PESSOAL', 'ACIDENTE_MATERIAL', 'ACIDENTE_AMBIENTAL'], true);
3571|        if (!$requires) {
3572|            return $empty;
3573|        }
3574|
3575|        $details = [];
3576|        $eventEntity = null;
3577|        $eventId = (int) ($occurrence['id'] ?? 0);
3578|        if ($eventId > 0) {
3579|            $eventEntity = $this->entityManager->getRepository(SsmaEvent::class)->find($eventId);
3580|            if ($eventEntity instanceof SsmaEvent) {
Request #52 deepseek-v4-flash P:65.09K C:480 CR:60.54K CW:0 5064ms
Reasoning
The occurrence detail view merges `$viewData` from `buildSsmaViewData` which is presumably shared across index and view (with 'occurrence_id' set). The listing view data includes the new flag. Since detail uses same `buildSsmaViewData`, the flag `ssma_can_change_event_manager` presumably present. Also `ssma_event_form_defaults`, `gestores_for_event_modal`, etc. are set in buildSsmaViewData. So detail also gets the flags because `$viewData` includes them. Good, no issue there. Now let's inspect the listing build function where the new code around 13177-13400 is. Let me read lines 13177 to 13200 to see context of changes with teamsForEventModal, gestores etc. Actually we already read the lines around that. Let me analyze `buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions` for details: When team scope and area scope are both applied: managerScopeIds = teams scope then intersect area. This matches the confirmed finding #2 (server-side assignment/validation ignores area but options include area). Fine (already reported). Now the fallback block removed: previously if gestoresForEventModal empty and no area filter, fallback to all members. Now build... options returns possibly empty if no leader found and no own leader and no existing manager in occurrences. For a plain member whose own leader is set, options includes own leader, select enabled? Actually can't change - field disabled. But the field must still contain the own leader's option selected. `gestoresForEventModal` built includes ownLeaderId, appended via appendSsmaEventModalGestorRow. Wait, in the modal select, options come from gestores. For a member, disabled select needs the default value among options; ownLeaderId included. Good. But there's a catch: appendSsmaEventModalGestorRow may filter by member presence in memberById (from allMembers). Let's read it.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_pattern": "", "search_text": "function appendSsmaEventModalGestorRow"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
20170|    private function appendSsmaEventModalGestorRow(

Request #53 deepseek-v4-flash P:65.61K C:88 CR:65.54K CW:0 1763ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 20140, "end_line": 20280}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 20140-20280
20140|     * IDs de produtos SSMA usados para montar a lista de gestores do modal de ocorrência.
20141|     *
20142|     * @return array<int, int>
20143|     */
20144|    private function resolveSsmaOccurrenceGestorProductIds(): array
20145|    {
20146|        $ids = [];
20147|        foreach (array_unique([
20148|            'ssma-occurrences',
20149|            $this->ssmaParentProductSlug,
20150|            $this->getCurrentSsmaPermissionProductSlug(),
20151|        ]) as $slug) {
20152|            if ($slug === '') {
20153|                continue;
20154|            }
20155|            $product = $this->entityManager
20156|                ->getRepository(\App\Entity\Product::class)
20157|                ->findOneBy(['slug' => $slug]);
20158|            if ($product) {
20159|                $ids[(int) $product->getId()] = (int) $product->getId();
20160|            }
20161|        }
20162|
20163|        return array_values($ids);
20164|    }
20165|
20166|    /**
20167|     * @param array<int, array<string, mixed>> $byId
20168|     * @param array<int, array<string, mixed>> $memberById
20169|     */
20170|    private function appendSsmaEventModalGestorRow(
20171|        array &$byId,
20172|        int $memberId,
20173|        array $memberById,
20174|        Company $company,
20175|    ): void {
20176|        if ($memberId <= 0 || isset($byId[$memberId])) {
20177|            return;
20178|        }
20179|
20180|        $row = $memberById[$memberId] ?? null;
20181|        if (!$row) {
20182|            $cm = $this->entityManager->find(CompanyMembers::class, $memberId);
20183|            if (!$cm instanceof CompanyMembers || $cm->getCompany()?->getId() !== $company->getId()) {
20184|                return;
20185|            }
20186|            if ($this->isSsmaExcludedTenantAdminUser($cm->getUser())) {
20187|                return;
20188|            }
20189|            $name = $this->ssmaMemberDisplayLabel($cm);
20190|            if ($name === '') {
20191|                $name = (string) ($cm->getEmail() ?? '');
20192|            }
20193|            if ($name === '') {
20194|                return;
20195|            }
20196|            $row = [
20197|                'id'       => $memberId,
20198|                'name'     => $name,
20199|                'email'    => (string) ($cm->getEmail() ?? ''),
20200|                'avatar'   => $cm->getUser()?->getAvatar(),
20201|                'area'     => $this->resolveSsmaMemberRootAreaName($cm),
20202|                'position' => $cm->getRoleMember() ? (string) $cm->getRoleMember()->getName() : '',
20203|            ];
20204|        } elseif (!empty($row['ssma_exclude_person_select'])) {
20205|            return;
20206|        }
20207|
20208|        $area = (string) ($row['area'] ?? ($memberById[$memberId]['area'] ?? ''));
20209|        if ($area === '') {
20210|            $cmForArea = $this->entityManager->find(CompanyMembers::class, $memberId);
20211|            $area = $this->resolveSsmaMemberRootAreaName(
20212|                $cmForArea instanceof CompanyMembers ? $cmForArea : null
20213|            );
20214|        }
20215|
20216|        $byId[$memberId] = [
20217|            'id'        => $memberId,
20218|            'name'      => (string) ($row['name'] ?? ''),
20219|            'email'     => (string) ($row['email'] ?? ''),
20220|            'avatar'    => $row['avatar'] ?? null,
20221|            'position'  => (string) ($row['position'] ?? ($memberById[$memberId]['position'] ?? '')),
20222|            'area'      => $area,
20223|            'team_name' => (string) ($row['team_name'] ?? ($memberById[$memberId]['team_name'] ?? '')),
20224|        ];
20225|    }
20226|
20227|    /**
20228|     * @param list<array<string, mixed>> $members
20229|     * @param array<int, string> $teamNameByMemberId
20230|     *
20231|     * @return list<array<string, mixed>>
20232|     */
20233|    private function enrichSsmaMemberRowsWithTeamMeta(array $members, array $teamNameByMemberId): array
20234|    {
20235|        foreach ($members as &$memberRow) {
20236|            $memberId = (int) ($memberRow['id'] ?? 0);
20237|            if (($memberRow['team_name'] ?? '') === '') {
20238|                $memberRow['team_name'] = $teamNameByMemberId[$memberId] ?? '';
20239|            }
20240|        }
20241|        unset($memberRow);
20242|
20243|        return $members;
20244|    }
20245|
20246|    /**
20247|     * Enriquece card de ação na página de detalhe da ocorrência (status, prazo, validação).
20248|     *
20249|     * @param array<string, mixed> $actionItem
20250|     * @param array<string, string> $actionTypeLabels
20251|     *
20252|     * @return array<string, mixed>
20253|     */
20254|    private function enrichOccurrenceViewActionCard(array $actionItem, array $actionTypeLabels, \DateTimeImmutable $today): array
20255|    {
20256|        $typeValue = (string) ($actionItem['type'] ?? '');
20257|        $deadlineBucket = $this->resolveDeadlineBucket($actionItem, $today);
20258|        $validationStatus = (string) ($actionItem['validation_status'] ?? '');
20259|        $validationMeta = $this->resolveSsmaActionValidationDisplay($validationStatus);
20260|        $cardStatus = $this->resolveSsmaActionCardStatus($validationStatus, $deadlineBucket);
20261|
20262|        return array_merge($actionItem, [
20263|            'type_label' => $this->resolveSsmaActionTypeLabel($typeValue, $actionTypeLabels),
20264|            'deadline_bucket_label' => $deadlineBucket['label'],
20265|            'deadline_bucket_color' => $deadlineBucket['color'],
20266|            'solved_label' => ($actionItem['solved'] ?? false) ? 'Resolvida' : 'Em aberto',
20267|            'solved_color' => ($actionItem['solved'] ?? false) ? '#28a745' : '#6c757d',
20268|            'validation_status_label' => $validationMeta['label'],
20269|            'validation_status_color' => $validationMeta['color'],
20270|            'card_status_label' => $cardStatus['label'],
20271|            'card_status_color' => $cardStatus['color'],
20272|        ]);
20273|    }
20274|
20275|    /**
20276|     * Membros elegíveis como "Gestor responsável" no modal de ocorrências.
20277|     * Combina PTBM direto (como supervisores), roles Symfony e resolução por serviço de tags.
20278|     *
20279|     * @return array<int, true>
20280|     */
Request #54 deepseek-v4-flash P:67.57K C:798 CR:65.66K CW:0 7719ms
Reasoning
OK. `appendSsmaEventModalGestorRow` falls back to DB find if the member not present in allMembers (memberById). Since allMembers list is only "Referenced members" for the detail view (filterSsmaMembersToReferencedForDetail). For the listing view, allMembers is probably whole company? On listing, allMembers might be the whole member list, and gestores options computed separately. OK. Now potential issue about the area restriction in options builder: `buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions` receives `$scopeMemberIds` already intersected by team + area. Then within build, it intersects leader ids with scope. Then adds own leader, plus manager_ids from existing occurrences (without scope check). Existing occurrences manager ids may be outside scope—intended to keep options so editing not broken. Now let me check the top of the big builder to see what the actual base `$occurrences` are when building options: they use the listing occurrences AFTER team filter? Actually the modal option builder adds manager_ids from existing occurrences in listing — occurrences visible to user (post filter). So an old manager might be included. OK. Next: examine the check on the picker for details. In `validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope`, only checks team scope and not area; if a user only has area limitation (no team), `$scope` null → returns null early, meaning no validation of manager at all. But applySsmaEventManagerAssignment for area-restricted managers: when not canSelect, it uses existing/own leader. For canSelect, assignment allowed set only team scope. If user has only area limitation (team scope null), allowed = all leaders (no intersect by area) — mismatch already confirmed in finding 2. Hmm. Let's now inspect the change to `canApproveSsmaOccurrence` again — the removal of `ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR` and gestor administrador bypass. The claim in the diff is that a "Gestor Administrador" member only gets the approve button if in the approver config list, even if not listed. That's intended. Now let me look at the earlier changed chunk: line ~10424 (validate). Look for a subtle bug: `$managerAllowed = isset($leaderIds[$managerId]) && isset($allowedMembers[$managerId]);` where `$allowedMembers` derived only from `$scope`; this is team scope. Then `if ($ownLeaderId !== null && $ownLeaderId === $managerId)` bypass (manager can be own leader even if not in team scope). For the CREATE flow for a plain member without own leader, manager_id must be a leader in team scope. For ROS with manager_id default to own leader (null if no superior) they block. Already confirmed as finding 1. Now what about EDIT flow for an existing ROS where manager_id is the reporter (legacy self) but reporter is not a leader and not the current user's own leader? Existing code `applySsmaEventManagerAssignment` for a member (canSelect false) sets manager_id = existingManagerId if >0 (preserves old manager_id, which is the reporter self). Then validation would reject because manager_id not leader / not in scope? But wait, validate runs on update too? For update: create flow calls validate? Let's see where validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope is invoked for create and edit. Search callers.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/SsmaController.php"], "search_text": "validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope("}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 3
10384|    private function validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope(array $data, Company $company, User $user): ?string
26489|        $teamScopeErr = $this->validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope($data, $company, $user);
26718|        $teamScopeErr = $this->validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope($data, $company, $user);

Request #55 deepseek-v4-flash P:68.48K C:154 CR:68.35K CW:0 2378ms
Reasoning
Let's read around 26400-26540 and 26600-26750 for create & update flows to examine how apply/validate interact, particularly edit where manager_id might be the old reporter member for ROS or old data. Also examine how the manager is stored in details (normalizeSsmaEventManagerInDetails).
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 26540, "file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 26380}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 26380-26540
26380|                $erros[] = $erroData;
26381|            }
26382|        }
26383|
26384|        if (isset($data['tempo_abordagem_min']) && (int) $data['tempo_abordagem_min'] < 0) {
26385|            $erros[] = 'Tempo da abordagem inválido.';
26386|        }
26387|
26388|        if (isset($data['qtd_pessoas_observadas']) && (int) $data['qtd_pessoas_observadas'] < 0) {
26389|            $erros[] = 'N. de pessoas observadas deve ser >= 0.';
26390|        }
26391|
26392|        return $erros;
26393|    }
26394|
26395|    /**
26396|     * Janela de registro da Abordagem: como a meta é semanal, a data em que a abordagem
26397|     * foi realizada só pode ser registrada até 7 dias depois (ex.: abordagem no dia 20 →
26398|     * registrável até o dia 27). Não se aplica à Inspeção.
26399|     */
26400|    private function validarSsmaAbordagemJanelaData(string $dataStr): ?string
26401|    {
26402|        $dataStr = trim($dataStr);
26403|        if ($dataStr === '') {
26404|            return null;
26405|        }
26406|
26407|        try {
26408|            $dataAbordagem = new \DateTimeImmutable($dataStr);
26409|        } catch (\Exception) {
26410|            return 'Data inválida.';
26411|        }
26412|
26413|        $hoje = new \DateTimeImmutable('today');
26414|        if ($dataAbordagem > $hoje) {
26415|            return 'Data da abordagem não pode ser futura.';
26416|        }
26417|
26418|        $limiteMinimo = $hoje->modify('-' . self::SSMA_ABORDAGEM_JANELA_REGISTRO_DIAS . ' days');
26419|        if ($dataAbordagem < $limiteMinimo) {
26420|            return sprintf(
26421|                'Data da abordagem fora do prazo: só é possível registrar até %d dias após a data em que foi realizada (a partir de %s).',
26422|                self::SSMA_ABORDAGEM_JANELA_REGISTRO_DIAS,
26423|                $limiteMinimo->format('d/m/Y')
26424|            );
26425|        }
26426|
26427|        return null;
26428|    }
26429|
26430|    // =========================================================================
26431|    // EVENTOS SSMA (SSMAEvent tipado)
26432|    // =========================================================================
26433|
26434|    /**
26435|     * POST /manager/ssma/events
26436|     * Cria um novo evento SSMA tipado.
26437|     */
26438|    public function createEvent(Request $request): JsonResponse
26439|    {
26440|        /** @var \App\Entity\User|null $user */
26441|        $user    = $this->getUser();
26442|        $company = $user?->getCompany();
26443|        if (!$user || !$company) {
26444|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Não autenticado.'], 401);
26445|        }
26446|
26447|        $data = json_decode($request->getContent(), true) ?? [];
26448|        $data = $this->normalizeSsmaEventPayload($data, $company);
26449|        $data = $this->normalizeSsmaEventManagerInDetails($data, $company);
26450|        $data = $this->applySsmaEventManagerAssignment($data, $company, $user);
26451|        $data = $this->applySsmaDescaracterPermissionGate($data, $company, $user);
26452|        $data = $this->ensureSsmaEventTitle($data);
26453|
26454|        $validator = new \App\Service\Ssma\SsmaEventValidator();
26455|        $errors    = $validator->validate($data, [
26456|            'allowed_type_keys' => $this->ssmaOccurrenceTypeConfig->getAllowedTypeKeys($company),
26457|        ]);
26458|        if ($errors !== []) {
26459|            return new JsonResponse([
26460|                'success' => false,
26461|                'message' => implode(' ', $errors),
26462|                'errors'  => $errors,
26463|            ], 422);
26464|        }
26465|
26466|        if (!$this->canMemberRegisterOwnOccurrence($company, $user)) {
26467|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Você não tem autorização para registrar ocorrências.'], 403);
26468|        }
26469|
26470|        $typeKey = strtoupper(trim((string) ($data['type'] ?? '')));
26471|        if ($typeKey !== '' && !$this->canCreateSsmaOccurrenceType($typeKey)) {
26472|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Você não tem permissão para registrar ocorrências deste tipo.'], 403);
26473|        }
26474|
26475|        $eventDetails = is_array($data['details'] ?? null) ? $data['details'] : [];
26476|        if (
26477|            in_array($typeKey, ['ROS', 'QUASE_ACIDENTE', 'ACIDENTE_PESSOAL', 'ACIDENTE_MATERIAL', 'ACIDENTE_AMBIENTAL'], true)
26478|            && !$this->canAccessSsmaEventAprofundamento(
26479|                $company,
26480|                $user,
26481|                $typeKey,
26482|                $eventDetails,
26483|                (int) ($user->getId() ?? 0)
26484|            )
26485|        ) {
26486|            $data = $this->stripSsmaEventAprofundamentoFieldsFromPayload($data, $typeKey, []);
26487|        }
26488|
26489|        $teamScopeErr = $this->validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope($data, $company, $user);
26490|        if ($teamScopeErr !== null) {
26491|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => $teamScopeErr], 403);
26492|        }
26493|
26494|        try {
26495|            $service  = new \App\Service\Ssma\SsmaEventService($this->entityManager, $this->ssmaOccurrenceTypeConfig);
26496|            $payloads = $service->splitPersonalAccidentPayloads($data);
26497|            $editorMeta = $this->resolveSsmaEditorMeta($company, $user);
26498|            $registeredByName = trim(($user->getFirstName() ?? '') . ' ' . ($user->getLastName() ?? ''));
26499|            if ($registeredByName === '') {
26500|                $registeredByName = $user->getEmail() ?? 'Sistema';
26501|            }
26502|
26503|            foreach ($payloads as $payload) {
26504|                $payloadErrors = $validator->validate($payload, [
26505|                    'allowed_type_keys' => $this->ssmaOccurrenceTypeConfig->getAllowedTypeKeys($company),
26506|                ]);
26507|                if ($payloadErrors !== []) {
26508|                    return new JsonResponse([
26509|                        'success' => false,
26510|                        'message' => implode(' ', $payloadErrors),
26511|                        'errors'  => $payloadErrors,
26512|                    ], 422);
26513|                }
26514|            }
26515|
26516|            $events = [];
26517|            $flashApprovals = [];
26518|            foreach ($payloads as $payload) {
26519|                $event = $service->createFromPayload($payload, $user, $company, $editorMeta);
26520|                $events[] = $event;
26521|                $this->ssmaAutomationService->triggerForEvent(
26522|                    'ssma_on_occurrence_created',
26523|                    $event,
26524|                    $company,
26525|                    ['registered_by_name' => $registeredByName]
26526|                );
26527|                if (!empty($event->getDetails()['immediate_risk'])) {
26528|                    $this->ssmaNotificationService->notifyImmediateRisk($event);
26529|                }
26530|                if ($this->ssmaEventAprofundamentoPending($event)) {
26531|                    $this->ssmaNotificationService->notifyAprofundamentoSpecialists(
26532|                        $company,
26533|                        $user,
26534|                        (string) $event->getType(),
26535|                        (int) $event->getId(),
26536|                        'event'
26537|                    );
26538|                }
26539|                $this->maybeSubmitOccurrenceForValidation($event, $company, $user);
26540|                try {
Request #56 deepseek-v4-flash P:70.81K C:1.72K CR:68.61K CW:0 14437ms
Reasoning
Wait - line 26466: `canMemberRegisterOwnOccurrence` returns true even for supervisors now, because they removed the isSsmaViewer check (line 11439 area). Let me examine that method - in the diff, they removed a block that returns false when `isSsmaViewer()`. Method returns `$this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user) !== null;`. So a supervisor with team filter now allowed to register occurrences if type in matrix. This changed behavior (removing readonly for supervisors). Intended per bug confirmation. OK. But note the new manager rule could now affect supervisors: for a supervisor (can change? canSelectSsmaEventResponsibleManager returns false for supervisor unless tag in list 'Gestor de Equipe' etc; Supervisor de Equipe tag not listed; isSsmaViewer might be supervisor too). Wait, supervisors: canSelect returns false. So the manager field is locked to own leader. But for a supervisor registering an occurrence for an injured worker (Acidente), the "gestor responsável" would be the supervisor's own leader, which might be wrong: previously supervisors could... hmm. This is a business rule decision. Their own leader might be outside of the team scope; but the server assignment: for !canSelect, `$data['details']['manager_id'] = $ownLeaderId;` (if no existing). And validation checks manager in allowedMembers. Wait, if the supervisor (who has team scope) tries to register a ROS for an injured person in their team, then manager_id = ownLeaderId (their own superior) which must belong to their team scope else validation fails. Actually wait: the validation for a supervisor with scope: after assignment manager_id=own leader, validation: leaderIds includes own leader if that person is a leader of someone. `managerAllowed = isset(leaderIds[ownLeader]) && isset(allowedMembers[ownLeader])`. If supervisor's own leader is NOT in supervisor's team, managerAllowed false unless the supervisor's own leader == ownLeaderId bypass: yes! `if ($ownLeaderId !== null && $ownLeaderId === $managerId) { $managerAllowed = true; }`. So bypass granted. Good. So if the supervisor's own leader isn't a member of their team, they can still register with manager=their own leader. But does the event's `team_id` need to be in supervisor's scope? validation of team_id: yes. And the event belongs to the supervisor's team, but manager is own leader possibly outside team. That's accepted by the bypass. That matches "sempre inclui o líder imediato de quem está logado". OK. Now consider this possibility for a subtle bug: `applySsmaEventManagerAssignment` when user can select (e.g. Gestor de Equipe) and creating an event for someone; the front default is own leader of current user. But the form may have selected a manager within team scope. Server restricts to team scope leaders, plus own leader. Good. Now the more serious one about ROS legacy update: Suppose an existing ROS event created under old rule has details manager_id = reporter (a member, not leader) who is now removed from the company, and a member who is NOT a manager edits the event. `applySsmaEventManagerAssignment` for !canSelect sets manager_id=existingManagerId (legacy member id). Validation (scope non-null) requires manager leader & in scope; ownLeaderId differs; so managerAllowed false → error. This blocks editing legacy ROS events by plain members. Could be intended/not important. Actually maybe legacy "Relatado por" events under old rule where reporter = member: manager_id = memberId. Under new rule, that is the "pessoa envolvida"? Hmm. It may cause updates to be refused. But is this a real regression? We need to know whether plain members can edit ROS they reported. Possibly they can edit while draft? In this system members register events; maybe editing is limited. Actually canEdit... but it's speculative; I won't report without evidence. Let me look for issues about security/company isolation, e.g., the change to `canApproveSsmaOccurrence`. This function had a big header: ROLE_TENANT now? ROLE_TENANT is lower-level than ROLE_MANAGER? Wait in canApproveSsmaOccurrence changed from ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR to ROLE_TENANT in the top-level role shortcut. Actually wait: in the previous code at 11208: ``` if ($this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN') || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER') || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR')) return true; ``` Now `|| $this->isGranted('ROLE_TENANT')`. But ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR maybe removed. Hold on: `ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR` is described elsewhere as 'Gestor Administrador' platform role? In the diff also they remove it in canSelect (still they keep `$this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR')` in ssma_is_gestor_user at 13682 though). Anyway. Let me focus and re-read the diff for the sections I haven't considered in detail: 1. Lines 11677 region - isOccurrenceVisibleToMember now uses company fallback resolve. This fallback calls resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId in filterOccurrencesForMember path; but it also loops occurrences; each with company provided → resolve by user id. That is a per-occurrence DB query (findBy) with caching by company:user. Since each occurrence's creator might be unique, up to O(N) queries. But function is a filter used for members only (plain member without team/area). Occurrence list for plain member is limited? Actually the occurrences loaded could be company-wide before filtering? Might be large, though membership filter. It only runs when company provided and createdByMemberId 0 (legacy rows without created_by_member_id). That's exactly a large N+1 candidate but only for legacy occurrences where created_by_member_id not set (i.e., legacy SsmaOccurrence rows or event rows? events map includes created_by_member_id always). Legacy occurrence rows come from SQL listing and may not include created_by_member_id field. So each legacy row in a plain member's list could cause a findBy per distinct creator user. Since rows go through SQL filter with person/team etc. The scale could be moderate. This is like confirmed finding 3 for the map path; not repeated. Actually finding 3 is about mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow which touches events; the fallback filter here is a related N+1 concern. Might be another instance. But I shouldn't repeat similar findings too eagerly? It's a distinct new code path at 11680-11687 and 13311. Actually the confirmed finding #3 is about line 15590 (in map). So I can report the similar N+1 in isOccurrenceVisibleToMember as a separate finding only if I think it's real and of consequence. But it only executes when $company provided; callers of filterOccurrencesForMember presumably pass company. Hmm. Let's check callers of filterOccurrencesForMember / isOccurrenceVisibleToMember. Search.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/SsmaController.php"], "search_text": "filterOccurrencesForMember("}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 2
11772|    private function filterOccurrencesForMember(array $occurrences, int $memberId, ?Company $company = null): array
13492|            $occurrences = $this->filterOccurrencesForMember($occurrences, $currentMemberId, $company);

code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/SsmaController.php"], "search_text": "isOccurrenceVisibleToMember("}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 4
11670|    private function isOccurrenceVisibleToMember(array $occurrence, int $memberId, ?Company $company = null): bool
11776|            fn (array $occurrence): bool => $this->isOccurrenceVisibleToMember($occurrence, $memberId, $company)
16702|            if (!$this->isOccurrenceVisibleToMember($row, $memberId, $company)) {
16714|        if (!$this->isOccurrenceVisibleToMember($row, $memberId, $company)) {

Request #57 deepseek-v4-flash P:72.77K C:214 CR:72.45K CW:0 2335ms
Reasoning
Let me look at filterOccurrencesForMember (line 11772), and lines 16690-16720 (tryLoadOccurrenceViewRowForActionStakeholder likely), where isOccurrenceVisibleToMember used with company provided.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "end_line": 11810, "start_line": 11725}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 11725-11810
11725|        $keys = [];
11726|        $conn = $this->entityManager->getConnection();
11727|        $midJson = json_encode($memberId) ?: (string) $memberId;
11728|
11729|        try {
11730|            $sql = <<<'SQL'
11731|SELECT DISTINCT
11732|  CASE WHEN a.occurrence_id IS NOT NULL THEN CONCAT('occ_', a.occurrence_id) ELSE CONCAT('event_', a.event_id) END AS vis_key
11733|FROM ssma_actions a
11734|WHERE a.company_id = ?
11735|AND (
11736|  JSON_CONTAINS(COALESCE(a.responsible_ids, JSON_ARRAY()), CAST(? AS JSON), '$') = 1
11737|  OR a.validator_member_id = ?
11738|)
11739|SQL;
11740|            $rows = $conn->fetchFirstColumn($sql, [(int) $company->getId(), $midJson, $memberId]);
11741|            foreach ($rows as $row) {
11742|                if (is_string($row) && $row !== '') {
11743|                    $keys[$row] = true;
11744|                }
11745|            }
11746|        } catch (\Throwable) {
11747|        }
11748|
11749|        $this->occurrenceActionLinkVisibilityCache = $keys;
11750|
11751|        return $keys;
11752|    }
11753|
11754|    private function isOccurrenceVisibleViaActionLink(array $occurrence, int $memberId, Company $company): bool
11755|    {
11756|        $occId = (int) ($occurrence['id'] ?? 0);
11757|        if ($occId <= 0) {
11758|            return false;
11759|        }
11760|
11761|        $key = ((bool) ($occurrence['is_ssma_event'] ?? false) ? 'event_' : 'occ_') . $occId;
11762|        $keys = $this->getOccurrenceActionLinkVisibilityKeys($memberId, $company);
11763|
11764|        return isset($keys[$key]);
11765|    }
11766|
11767|    /**
11768|     * @param array<int, array<string, mixed>> $occurrences
11769|     *
11770|     * @return array<int, array<string, mixed>>
11771|     */
11772|    private function filterOccurrencesForMember(array $occurrences, int $memberId, ?Company $company = null): array
11773|    {
11774|        return array_values(array_filter(
11775|            $occurrences,
11776|            fn (array $occurrence): bool => $this->isOccurrenceVisibleToMember($occurrence, $memberId, $company)
11777|        ));
11778|    }
11779|
11780|    /**
11781|     * Garante que ocorrências/eventos em que o membro é executor/validador de ação apareçam na listagem,
11782|     * mesmo quando o registro não passou no filtro inicial da página.
11783|     *
11784|     * @param array<int, array<string, mixed>> $occurrences
11785|     *
11786|     * @return array<int, array<string, mixed>>
11787|     */
11788|    private function appendMissingActionLinkedOccurrences(
11789|        array $occurrences,
11790|        int $memberId,
11791|        Company $company,
11792|        User $user,
11793|    ): array {
11794|        if ($memberId <= 0) {
11795|            return $occurrences;
11796|        }
11797|
11798|        $existing = [];
11799|        foreach ($occurrences as $row) {
11800|            $id = (int) ($row['id'] ?? 0);
11801|            if ($id <= 0) {
11802|                continue;
11803|            }
11804|            $existing[(!empty($row['is_ssma_event']) ? 'event_' : 'occ_') . $id] = true;
11805|        }
11806|
11807|        foreach (array_keys($this->getOccurrenceActionLinkVisibilityKeys($memberId, $company)) as $key) {
11808|            if (isset($existing[$key])) {
11809|                continue;
11810|            }
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "end_line": 16730, "start_line": 16640}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 16640-16730
16640|
16641|    private function isCurrentUserSsmaActionValidator(SsmaAction $action, Company $company, ?User $user): bool
16642|    {
16643|        $member = $user ? $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user) : null;
16644|
16645|        return $this->ssmaStakeholderActionPermissionService->canValidateAsDesignatedValidator($action, $member);
16646|    }
16647|
16648|    private function canCurrentUserEditSsmaAction(SsmaAction $action, Company $company, ?User $user): bool
16649|    {
16650|        return $this->canMutateSsmaActionPlan();
16651|    }
16652|
16653|    private function canCurrentUserResolveSsmaAction(
16654|        SsmaAction $action,
16655|        Company $company,
16656|        ?User $user,
16657|        string $operation = 'resolve'
16658|    ): bool {
16659|        return $this->ssmaStakeholderActionPermissionService->canUserResolveAction(
16660|            $action,
16661|            $company,
16662|            $user,
16663|            $this->canManageSsmaOccurrences(),
16664|            $operation
16665|        );
16666|    }
16667|
16668|    private function canCurrentUserValidateSsmaAction(SsmaAction $action, Company $company, ?User $user): bool
16669|    {
16670|        return $this->ssmaStakeholderActionPermissionService->canUserValidateAction(
16671|            $action,
16672|            $company,
16673|            $user,
16674|            $this->canManageSsmaOccurrences()
16675|        );
16676|    }
16677|
16678|    /**
16679|     * @return array<string, mixed>|null
16680|     */
16681|    private function tryLoadOccurrenceViewRowForActionStakeholder(
16682|        int $id,
16683|        ?string $kind,
16684|        Company $company,
16685|        User $user
16686|    ): ?array {
16687|        $member = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
16688|        $memberId = (int) ($member?->getId() ?? 0);
16689|        if ($memberId <= 0) {
16690|            return null;
16691|        }
16692|
16693|        [, $teams] = $this->loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite($company);
16694|        $teamsById = array_column($teams, null, 'id');
16695|
16696|        if ($kind === 'event') {
16697|            $event = $this->entityManager->getRepository(SsmaEvent::class)->find($id);
16698|            if (!$event instanceof SsmaEvent || $event->getCompany()->getId() !== $company->getId()) {
16699|                return null;
16700|            }
16701|            $row = $this->mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow($event, $teamsById);
16702|            if (!$this->isOccurrenceVisibleToMember($row, $memberId, $company)) {
16703|                return null;
16704|            }
16705|
16706|            return $row;
16707|        }
16708|
16709|        $occurrence = $this->entityManager->getRepository(SsmaOccurrence::class)->find($id);
16710|        if (!$occurrence instanceof SsmaOccurrence || $occurrence->getCompany()->getId() !== $company->getId()) {
16711|            return null;
16712|        }
16713|        $row = $this->mapSsmaOccurrenceEntityToListRow($occurrence, $teamsById);
16714|        if (!$this->isOccurrenceVisibleToMember($row, $memberId, $company)) {
16715|            return null;
16716|        }
16717|
16718|        return $row;
16719|    }
16720|
16721|    private function resolveActionDeadlineEditMeta(SsmaAction $action, Company $company, ?User $user): array
16722|    {
16723|        $isAdmin = $this->canManageSsmaConfig();
16724|        $member = $user ? $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user) : null;
16725|        $memberId = $member ? (int) $member->getId() : 0;
16726|        $respIds = $action->getResponsibleIds() ?? [];
16727|        $isResponsible = $memberId > 0 && in_array($memberId, $respIds, true);
16728|        $isValidator = $this->isCurrentUserSsmaActionValidator($action, $company, $user);
16729|        $canManage = $this->canMutateSsmaActionPlan();
16730|        $pendingValidation = $action->getValidationStatus() === 'pending_validation';
Request #58 deepseek-v4-flash P:75.22K C:1.45K CR:72.96K CW:0 13106ms
Reasoning
OK. I want to move on and identify actual concrete issues. Let me focus on areas that could be actual bugs: Potential new issue 1 (list N+1 double resolution): mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow now calls resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId per event row; however resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId has a per-company/user cache, so for repeated user across rows, no extra query. Distinct users → one query each. That's the confirmed finding 3 already. Potential new issue 2: `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser` uses `$this->entityManager->getRepository(SsmaEvent::class)->findBy(...)` after `loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite($company)` inside. Wait it calls `[, $teams] = $this->loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite($company);` — this loads all members AND teams for the company again (large query) even though the caller already loaded them. That is a performance concern on an index page. Let me check the function: yes it reloads entire company members/teams for team labels, but does it even need the members? It uses $teamsById to map event rows. Callers in index have the teams already. This reload duplicates potentially heavy query (loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite loads members with teams joined etc.), and appends even when zero new events after fetch. Also inside list where occurrence count is large this could be duplicated per user? Called once. Cost acceptable maybe, but note: loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite is heavy (all company members). Since events created by user returned; they need team mapping only for those events. They could build map from the passed teams. But there's no guarantee that function has the same teams as the caller (caller loaded teams already). Anyway, this is a potential performance concern, but probably minor. But wait, calling `loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite` inside a per-request listing method that is already big... it might already be invoked earlier by caller; this is an extra full load. Might be worth a low severity comment. Actually, in the elseif branch (team/area scope present), this append is executed on the listing. loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite inside might cause an extra query of the entire company's members + teams each time a supervisor opens dashboard. That could be meaningful. But since we're told not to over-report style/performance without data scale evidence, and listing already loads all members + teams anyway in the same request (the caller already has $allMembers/$teams). So the extra call duplicates heavy work. I could report as performance (medium/low). Hmm. Actually more importantly, let me check whether this reload breaks scope? Not necessarily. Potential new issue 3: In appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser, events that are "rascunho"/private (e.g., event in a state not to be listed in dashboard)? The function appends any event the user created regardless of whether it would be excluded for status/type reasons in other filters (e.g., technical types only visible to specialist). For example, a plain member might create a ROS of a type they have permission to; after changing tag, they lose team scope? But creator still sees them. Intended. But consider a user with a technical specialist scope (isTechSpecialistOnly, occurrenceTeamFilterIds === []) — the earlier team filter block is skipped (isTechSpecialistOnly). Then occurrence filter block at line 13481: since occurrenceTeamFilterIds === null? Actually for tech specialist: occurrenceTeamFilterIds === []? Hmm tech specialist branch returns; those users would be at 13481 condition false because... `occurrenceTeamFilterIds === null` needed. For tech specialist it is [] (empty), not null. So it's excluded from member filter too. Then elseif condition: `occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== null` (since it's []) triggers append... So tech specialist's own events appended but that's fine. Potential issue 4: In build data at 13680 (ssma_is_gestor_user now includes ssmaIsTagAreaGestor) etc. Wait diff added `$ssmaIsTagAreaGestor` to the list? Actually diff at line 13680: ``` 'ssma_is_gestor_user' => $ssmaIsTagTeamGestor || $ssmaIsTagAreaGestor || $ssmaProductTagName === 'Gestor Administrador' ... ``` Yes changed. Potential issue 5 (new functional bug candidate): `ssmaIsGestorUser` and `ssma_can_change_event_manager` in the listing build are computed. But note that there's asymmetry: the modal label text and behavior now rely on can change; also `window.SSMA_IS_GESTOR_USER` used elsewhere for other behaviors (maybe choosing injured person filters etc.). Not relevant. Potential issue 6: The disabled `select` in the modal for member with default own leader. The requirement mark `required` when gestoresList length > 0. For members where no own leader, gestoresList length might still be >0 because existing managers in occurrences list from whole listing; plus leaders; etc. Actually if leader list empty but member has no leader, keep=leaderIds(empty) + occurrences manager ids. But it's a NEW event creation, and occurrences listing for the modal? occurrences passed to builder are the listing rows visible to the user; likely only filtered set. If user has no leader and no occurrence in the list, gestores list empty → select not required, and value empty. Server validation: managerId <=0 => 'Informe o gestor responsável.' error. So a member without superior who registers new event gets 403 server error "Informe o gestor responsável." This is the confirmed finding #1. OK. Let me look at other areas of diff not yet deeply inspected: - The changed code around 11439 (removed isSsmaViewer block from canMemberRegisterOwnOccurrence) and around 11205 (canApproveSsmaOccurrence). I might have missed that in canApproveSsmaOccurrence, after the role shortcuts they call getSsmaCompany? Let me read the full method to see any new problem introduced, e.g., that approverIds config returns ids that include gestor administrador previously given bypass. And confirm the removal doesn't cause a recursion/perf problem. Let me read the method fully.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 11195, "end_line": 11300}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 11195-11300
11195|        }
11196|
11197|        foreach ($aproMap as $typeKey => $teamId) {
11198|            if (in_array($teamId, $userTeamIds, true)) {
11199|                $types[] = $typeKey;
11200|            }
11201|        }
11202|
11203|        return $types;
11204|    }
11205|
11206|    private function canApproveSsmaOccurrence(?Company $company, ?User $user): bool
11207|    {
11208|        // Tenant/plataforma sempre valida (mesma regra guarda-chuva usada em
11209|        // canEditOccurrenceDetail() e nos demais gates administrativos do SSMA).
11210|        if (
11211|            $this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN')
11212|            || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER')
11213|            || $this->isGranted('ROLE_TENANT')
11214|        ) {
11215|            return true;
11216|        }
11217|        if (!$company || !$user) {
11218|            return false;
11219|        }
11220|
11221|        $member = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
11222|        if (!$member instanceof CompanyMembers) {
11223|            return false;
11224|        }
11225|
11226|        // BUG CONFIRMADO em reunião de alinhamento (2026-09-03, seção "Aprovador de ocorrência"):
11227|        // validar depende exclusivamente de quem está listado na configuração de aprovadores —
11228|        // inclusive Gestor Administrador. "O gestor administrativo se ele não tiver [configurado
11229|        // na lista], nem aparece pra ele." Removido o bypass automático por tag
11230|        // (memberIsSsmaGestorAdministrador) e por ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR, que concediam o botão
11231|        // "Validar ocorrência" sem passar pela lista de aprovadores.
11232|        $approverIds = $this->ssmaOccurrenceTypeConfig->getFlashReportApproverIds($company);
11233|
11234|        return in_array((int) $member->getId(), array_map('intval', $approverIds), true);
11235|    }
11236|
11237|    private function ssmaEventTypeRequiresAprofundamentoFinalizeGate(string $type): bool
11238|    {
11239|        return in_array(strtoupper(trim($type)), [
11240|            'ROS',
11241|            'QUASE_ACIDENTE',
11242|            'ACIDENTE_PESSOAL',
11243|            'ACIDENTE_MATERIAL',
11244|            'ACIDENTE_AMBIENTAL',
11245|        ], true);
11246|    }
11247|
11248|    private function isSsmaEventAprofundamentoExplicitlyFinalized(\App\Entity\SsmaEvent $event): bool
11249|    {
11250|        $details = is_array($event->getDetails()) ? $event->getDetails() : [];
11251|        $status = strtolower(trim((string) ($details['aprofundamento_status'] ?? '')));
11252|
11253|        return $status === 'finalized' || !empty($details['aprofundamento_complete']);
11254|    }
11255|
11256|    /**
11257|     * ROS "visto e resolvido" dispensa o aprofundamento técnico no gate de validação.
11258|     */
11259|    private function ssmaEventSkipsAprofundamentoValidationGate(\App\Entity\SsmaEvent $event): bool
11260|    {
11261|        if (strtoupper(trim((string) $event->getType())) !== 'ROS') {
11262|            return false;
11263|        }
11264|
11265|        $details = is_array($event->getDetails()) ? $event->getDetails() : [];
11266|
11267|        return !empty($details['ros_resolved']);
11268|    }
11269|
11270|    /**
11271|     * Ocorrência pronta para o gate de validação (aprofundamento completo ou tipo sem essa etapa).
11272|     */
11273|    private function isEventReadyForOccurrenceValidation(\App\Entity\SsmaEvent $event): bool
11274|    {
11275|        if ($this->ssmaEventSkipsAprofundamentoValidationGate($event)) {
11276|            return true;
11277|        }
11278|
11279|        if ($this->ssmaEventAprofundamentoPending($event)) {
11280|            return false;
11281|        }
11282|
11283|        if ($this->ssmaEventTypeRequiresAprofundamentoFinalizeGate($event->getType())) {
11284|            $details = is_array($event->getDetails()) ? $event->getDetails() : [];
11285|            $status = strtolower(trim((string) ($details['aprofundamento_status'] ?? '')));
11286|            if ($status === 'draft') {
11287|                return false;
11288|            }
11289|        }
11290|
11291|        return true;
11292|    }
11293|
11294|    private function isSsmaEventStatusFinalized(\App\Entity\SsmaEvent $event): bool
11295|    {
11296|        $raw = trim((string) $event->getStatus());
11297|        $upper = mb_strtoupper($raw);
11298|
11299|        return $upper === SsmaEvent::STATUS_CONCLUIDO
11300|            || in_array(mb_strtolower($raw), ['finalizada', 'resolvida', 'concluida'], true);
Request #59 deepseek-v4-flash P:78.06K C:664 CR:76.54K CW:0 5833ms
Reasoning
canApproveSsmaOccurrence now: it requires company & user (member). Note top-level shortcut ROLE_TENANT now allows approving even when there's no member configuration. That matches other admin gates. But there's a subtle problem: ROLE_TENANT is a lower role than ROLE_MANAGER? Actually probably ROLE_TENANT is a platform-level (Aura) role. In canApproveSsmaOccurrence, formerly ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR was a guard (admin gestor). Removing ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR means Gestores Administradores with the platform ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR (not the member tag) no longer can approve unless in approverIds or have ROLE_MANAGER/TENANT. That's the intended bug confirmation. The comment says platform-level roles remain. But note the diff header says "Tenant/plataforma sempre valida (mesma regra guarda-chuva...)": adds ROLE_TENANT but drops ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR. Note other administrative gates "canEditOccurrenceDetail" include ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR? This could cause inconsistency: users with ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR can edit occurrence detail but no longer can approve? But the bug confirmation says Gestor Administrador bypass removed - the approver must be in the config list. So intended. But what about ROLE_TENANT being newly added here - was ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR mapping to tenant? No matter. Now, does the drop of `memberIsSsmaGestorAdministrador` affect the view's ability for admins? The approve button rendering probably calls canApproveSsmaOccurrence server-side, and the template likely checks can_approve_occurrence flag from controller. In occurrence_view, can_approve_occurrence derived from canApproveSsmaOccurrence($company, $user) && is event. So a Gestor Administrador not in approverIds won't see the "Validar ocorrência" button anymore. Intended. OK. Let me look at lines around 10402 - buildSsmaEventModalGestorMemberIdSet was removed usage; there could be other callers still referencing removed set. Wait, they removed from validation only; other callers may exist. Let's search for buildSsmaEventModalGestorMemberIdSet usage.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/SsmaController.php"], "search_text": "buildSsmaEventModalGestorMemberIdSet"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 2
20100|        foreach ($this->buildSsmaEventModalGestorMemberIdSet($company) as $memberId => $_) {
20281|    private function buildSsmaEventModalGestorMemberIdSet(Company $company): array

code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/SsmaController.php"], "search_text": "forceSsmaRosReporterForPlainMember"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
28399|    private function forceSsmaRosReporterForPlainMember(array $data, Company $company, User $user): array

Request #60 deepseek-v4-flash P:78.86K C:1.11K CR:78.72K CW:0 9429ms
Reasoning
`forceSsmaRosReporterForPlainMember` is now deprecated but still used? Its only use was at create/update, now replaced by applySsmaEventManagerAssignment. It's still defined and now delegates to applySsmaEventManagerAssignment. Might be dead code (deprecated). Not an issue. Let's examine the area in the diff about the standalone test file. Confirmed finding 5 already noted the tautologies. Maybe also note that file has no declared assert/strict and not wired to PHPUnit; it's a standalone script. It duplicates implementation logic rather than exercising the real code (same finding). So nothing new. Now let me check the new `collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams` change? Not changed. Let me consider the change in occurrence_view.html.twig more carefully for a possible rendering bug or escaping bug. In the diff: ``` {% set created_by_lookup_id = occurrence.created_by_member_id|default(occurrence.created_by_id|default(null)) %} {% set created_by_member_key = created_by_lookup_id ? ('member_' ~ created_by_lookup_id) : '' %} ``` Bug scenario: For a legacy ROS occurrence where the creator's member id equals... hmm. Actually consider that member_by_id keys are prefixed 'member_' with member id. But created_by_lookup_id might be the `created_by_id` which is a USER id (not member id) when created_by_member_id absent. member_by_id map uses member ids (from allMembers list of members). So `member_<userId>` won't find a member unless the member id coincidentally equals the user id. The fallback uses the manager member then. For ROS events, created_by_member_id present now. For legacy occurrence entities (SsmaOccurrence), created_by_member_id absent; created_by_id might be member id? Let's check mapSsmaOccurrenceEntityToListRow created_by field to see if the value stored is a user id or a member id. In SsmaOccurrence entity, created_by likely a user id (as in createdById). The SQL list rows for legacy occurrence probably include created_by_id = user id, created_by_member_id = null. So for legacy occurrences, "Responsável pelo cadastro" will fall back to manager member (if present) — that's a possible wrong attribution. But note previously label for non-ROS was "Gestor responsável" and ROS "Relatado por" with manager_member primary. So for a legacy occurrence, creator not resolvable. Already essentially finding 4. Let me not duplicate. Let me instead examine for security issue about manager data exposure: In list/detail for approvers (loadOccurrenceListRowsForDetailView) they add members to allMembers via filterSsmaMembersToReferencedForDetail — with `$add($row['created_by_member_id'])` and `$add($row['created_by_id'])` — a user id; but if user id happens to match a member id of another member (very possible: user.id 3, member id 3? not typically equal because member IDs are autoincrement and user ids in separate table; there is no guarantee they don't collide, but rare coincidence). Alright. Let's look at the update event flow to examine whether existing manager preservation path is robust when the logged member is NOT the event creator (e.g., a supervisor editing event created by a member in their team, where existing manager_id is the leader of the reporter). For canSelect false, the server will preserve existing manager_id, or set to own leader only when no existing. In editing, since existing manager >0, manager preserved. Then validation: manager must be leader within scope or own leader. If the supervisor edits a ROS created by a subordinate whose leader is the supervisor himself (manager_id == supervisor), the supervisor's scope contains himself via the special case: occurrenceTeamFilterIds==[] + tag supervisor adds self member id to memberIdsInTeams at 13295. So allowedMembers include self. But validation `$allowedMembers` derived in validate from `collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams($company, $scope)` (team membership). Wait that collect function only returns member team memberships, not the self-added member. So a supervisor with empty team scope [] returns the specialized path: `if ($scope === [])` handles specialists (needs permission tag links). For supervisor with no team? getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds returns [] for supervisor without teams. Then validation goes to "Seu perfil não está vinculado a nenhuma equipe..." unless they have SsmaPermissionTagMember links (tech). Wait! Supervisor de Equipe without team attribute would get blocked? But supervisors with team filter == []? isSsmaTagTeamSupervisor? The scope function returns [] for supervisors? Let's read getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds to understand.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/SsmaController.php"], "search_text": "function getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
10249|    private function getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds(?Company $company, ?User $user): ?array

Request #61 deepseek-v4-flash P:80.04K C:88 CR:79.87K CW:0 2128ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 10249, "end_line": 10340}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 10249-10340
10249|    private function getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds(?Company $company, ?User $user): ?array
10250|    {
10251|        if (!$company || !$user instanceof User) {
10252|            return null;
10253|        }
10254|
10255|        if ($this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN') || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER')) {
10256|            return null;
10257|        }
10258|
10259|        $member = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
10260|        if (!$member) {
10261|            return null;
10262|        }
10263|
10264|        $tag = $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($member);
10265|        // 'Supervisor' puro (sem "de Equipe") ?? supervisor global: sem restrição de equipe, igual ao Gestor Administrador.
10266|        if ($tag && in_array($tag->getName(), ['Gestor Administrador', 'Supervisor'], true)) {
10267|            return null;
10268|        }
10269|
10270|        $parsed = $this->parseCompanyMemberTeamIds($member);
10271|
10272|        if ($tag && in_array($tag->getName(), $this->ssmaTeamScopePermissionTagNames(), true)) {
10273|            return $parsed;
10274|        }
10275|
10276|        if ($tag && $tag->getTeamLimitation()) {
10277|            return $parsed;
10278|        }
10279|
10280|        $viewerTeams = $this->getSsmaViewerTeamIds();
10281|        if ($viewerTeams !== null) {
10282|            return $viewerTeams;
10283|        }
10284|
10285|        // Membro sem tag de supervisão/gestão SSMA (ex.: stakeholder via ocorrência) não deve
10286|        // ter filtro de equipe aplicado: retorna null para que filterOccurrencesForMember
10287|        // mostre apenas o conteúdo próprio. Retornar [] zeraria todos os dados antes disso.
10288|        if ($tag !== null && $parsed === []) {
10289|            if ($this->resolveCurrentUserTechnicalTypes($company, $user) !== []) {
10290|                return [];
10291|            }
10292|
10293|            return null;
10294|        }
10295|
10296|        return null;
10297|    }
10298|
10299|    /**
10300|     * Recorte de área do usuário logado na Prevenção Ativa.
10301|     *
10302|     * Fonte única para listagem, busca, detalhe e gravação: um escopo não restrito libera tudo,
10303|     * um escopo restrito com conjunto vazio nega tudo. Não existe estado intermediário em que
10304|     * a ausência de área cadastrada remova o filtro.
10305|     */
10306|    private function getSsmaPreventionAreaScope(?Company $company, ?User $user): SsmaPreventionAreaScope
10307|    {
10308|        if (!$company || !$user instanceof User) {
10309|            return SsmaPreventionAreaScope::unrestricted();
10310|        }
10311|
10312|        $isPlatformAdmin = $this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN') || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER');
10313|        $member = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
10314|        $tag = $member ? $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($member, 'ssma-prevention') : null;
10315|
10316|        return $this->ssmaPreventionAreaAuthorization
10317|            ->resolveScope($company, $member, $tag, $isPlatformAdmin);
10318|    }
10319|
10320|    /**
10321|     * @return list<int>
10322|     */
10323|    private function parseCompanyMemberAreaIds(CompanyMembers $member): array
10324|    {
10325|        return $this->ssmaPreventionAreaAuthorization->memberAreaIds($member);
10326|    }
10327|
10328|    /**
10329|     * Guarda de leitura de inspeção por ID: quem não vê na listagem também não abre pelo ID.
10330|     */
10331|    private function canViewInspectionUnderAreaScope(SsmaInspection $inspection, ?Company $company, ?User $user): bool
10332|    {
10333|        return $this->ssmaPreventionAreaAuthorization->canViewInspection(
10334|            $this->getSsmaPreventionAreaScope($company, $user),
10335|            $inspection
10336|        );
10337|    }
10338|
10339|    /**
10340|     * Guarda de leitura de abordagem por ID: mesmo critério da listagem (observador no recorte).
Request #62 deepseek-v4-flash P:81.32K C:988 CR:80K CW:0 8756ms
Reasoning
OK. Let me take stock and list candidate NEW issues (beyond confirmed): Potential candidate issues to verify/report: 1. `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser` re-loads full company members/teams (heavy duplicate). Medium/low perf. Maybe I'd report since in the listing path for supervisors every dashboard call triggers the whole company member list reload — that could double the cost. Might be worth reporting. But I want a stronger correctness issue. 2. **Security/overexposure:** `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser` appends all user-created events regardless of type/status/approval state into a list where other collections (actions, inspections) were filtered. But creator always should see own. Fine. 3. **Bug in `isOccurrenceVisibleToMember` short circuit order?** The creator check added AFTER manager check but BEFORE person check; behavior unaffected. 4. **Bug in the `searchSsmaMembers` endpoint's limit:** `$limit = min($defaultCap, max(1, (int) $request->query->get('limit', 20)));` For `responsible_manager` param (a new feature) the defaultCap is 50 (forGestorModal false). Wait - the JS calls remoteExtraParams `{ gestor_modal: 1, responsible_manager: 1 }`. So forGestorModal = true. So cap 100 for picker? gestor_modal 1 & picker not set → cap 100. OK. Wait actually remoteExtraParams: `{ gestor_modal: 1, responsible_manager: 1 }`, they didn't include `picker:1`, so cap 100. OK. But, note: for `responsible_manager` the allowedMemberMap restrict to leaders within scope plus own leader. Since these leaders are computed against the scope. If no scope (null), allowedMemberMap = leaderIds (whole company). But what about a member? A member could call search endpoint manually with responsible_manager:1 and enumerate all leaders company-wide (name search with blank q returns up to 100 leaders) — is that a leak? Leaders are essentially supervisors in company; member likely can already access the full member list through other endpoints? The previous `searchSsmaMembers` with no restrictions returns all company members when q is blank? Wait when allowedMemberMap null and no team filter, and !forGestorModal, ALL members in the company are returned up to limit 50. So member could already enumerate company members. So not new info leak. 5. **Area scope** - the picker with responsible_manager applies team scope and area scope. For the modal remote search in area-restricted context matches options built server side which includes area intersection. Good consistency. But actually wait — there's an inconsistency candidate! The search endpoint for responsible_manager applies `getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds` and then `getSsmaPreventionAreaScope` intersect. But in `buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions` (SSR modal options) managerScopeIds is computed from team filter ids and area scope too. So consistent. Now the assignment/validation (server) only enforces team scope (no area). Confirmed finding #2. 6. **Bug candidate:** For plain member (canSelect false) create with `existingManagerId=0`: assignment sets manager_id = ownLeaderId only when ownLeaderId != null; else leaves unset. Validation requires manager_id for any type? Actually validate only if scope non-null. For plain member scope null → validate returns null (no error). Wait! For a plain member without team scope, getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds returns null (as a member with tag and parsed [] and not tech). Then validate returns null (no manager check). But the event still requires a manager at SsmaEventValidator level? Let me see whether SsmaEventValidator enforces manager_id required for ROS etc. The earlier diff: `if ($managerId <= 0) return 'Informe o gestor responsável.';` only under scope non-null. The SsmaEventValidator is separate and likely validates payload shape. Actually if manager is required (select required attr in template when gestoresList>0) and not sent, server returns generic error? Let's check SsmaEventValidator for manager_id requirement. Search.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "manager_id", "file_patterns": ["src/Service/Ssma/SsmaEventValidator.php"]}
No matches found
Request #63 deepseek-v4-flash P:82.32K C:54 CR:82.3K CW:0 1659ms
Reasoning
Find the validator file.
Tool Calls (1)
file_find
Show Details
{"query_name": "SsmaEventValidator"}
src/Service/Ssma/SsmaEventValidator.php
tests/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php
tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php
Request #64 deepseek-v4-flash P:82.43K C:76 CR:82.3K CW:0 1542ms
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/Ssma/SsmaEventValidator.php"], "search_text": "manager"}
No matches found
Request #65 deepseek-v4-flash P:82.52K C:3.35K CR:82.43K CW:0 27993ms
Reasoning
So the payload-level validator doesn't require manager. manager required is enforced only by validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope when scope non-null. For plain member scope null, manager could be empty and event saves with no manager. Then later enrich fallback in list fills manager_id from creator's superior at display time. Actually, the template requires manager in modal when gestoresList length >0. But members may skip if hidden? Hmm. OK. Let me step back. Given the review time, focus on high-value new defects. Let me re-inspect the `applySsmaEventManagerAssignment` and its usage for the "edição" flow where `$existingDetails` passed. In update flow, `$existingDetails` presumably retrieved before, used only to read existing manager_id. Wait, in update: `$data = $this->applySsmaEventManagerAssignment($data, $company, $user, $existingDetails);` — existingDetails may contain previous manager_id that the user cannot change. But if the user is the approver / manager with canSelect true and changing manager to another allowed leader, assignment allows requested if in allowed or equals existingManagerId. Good. Consider the scenario: user is a supervisor who cannot select; the update event originally created by another member in a previous company state; new rule may need to fix manager_id to own leader? But existingManagerId >0, preserved. If existingManagerId is a stale removed member...? The superior is a CompanyMembers removed? enrich fallback only fills if managerId<=0. If existingManagerId points to removed member who's not a leader... then create/edit data persists old id, and display would not find it. Could be fine because legacy. But maybe a bug: A supervisor (cannot select) editing an event of an injured person who is not them: manager = existingManagerId remains whatever the reporter originally chose. That's fine. Now a genuine new functional risk: **A plain member editing their own ROS/Event would lock manager to existing manager**, even if the own leader changed over time. Possibly acceptable. Let me instead check the JS code added to `_modal_event.html.twig` `evSyncReportedByFieldForType` for a bug: ``` sel.disabled = !canChange; var defs = window.SSMA_EVENT_FORM_DEFAULTS || {}; var defaultManagerId = defs.manager_id ? String(defs.manager_id) : ''; if (!sel.value && defaultManagerId) { for (...) { ... sel.value = defaultManagerId; trigger change; break; } } ``` Potential bug: For editing an existing event where manager already selected, `sel.value` set before sync? The default only when no value. On edit flow, pre-populated via set values, so no override. Good. But there's a subtle problem: they removed behavior where for ROS & pessoa física the field is hidden & set reporter id. Now the manager select is always shown and locked to own leader (if canChange false). If own leader has no option (because build didn't include own leader), the JS only sets `sel.value` if option exists. Build includes own leader id always (via options builder) and search remote (for can change). For member with own leader in gestores list: enabled? Member cannot change so it's disabled. But there's a catch: a `disabled` select is not validated by the browser's `required`? Actually `required` ignored on disabled inputs for submission; but the value still read via JS. However, we observed that when the field is disabled, its option default still set programmatically. But consider: after creating an event, there's likely a reset of form. Not relevant. More interesting bug candidate: `sel.required` when gestoresList >0 and can change == false, plus the field default own leader is in options — required satisfied. If own leader null and no default, required blocks submit via browser native validation (since field required and no value, but it is disabled → required ignored → submit succeeds with empty manager). Then server rejects for scope non-null, or accepts for plain member scope null (no manager) — creating events without a manager for ROS! Actually then displayed with no manager fallback. Might be an edge case but rare. Let me look for a potentially important bug: **The new "Responsável pelo cadastro" / created_by vs manager for the approval workflow / flash report**. Consider ROS display block changed. In occurrence_view, previously for ROS, "Relatado por" showed manager. Now for ROS it shows created_by (creator) then falls back. For ROS under the new rule, the creator is now the reporter (member), and manager is the leader. So display creator as "Responsável pelo cadastro". OK. But wait: previously under old rule for ROS by plain member, manager_id = reporter self. The creator = same member, so both same. Under new rule, manager_id = leader. "Responsável pelo cadastro" = creator (the member). OK. For events (e.g., accident), previously "Gestor responsável" (manager). Now shows two fields: "Responsável pelo cadastro" (creator member) and "Gestor responsável". Both for ROS and non-ROS. Good. But new issue: `reported_by_member = created_by_member ?: manager_member`, and in the "Responsável pelo cadastro" section they render created_by_member else reported_by_member (which equals manager member). Confirmed finding #4. Hmm. Let me search the git diff around the change of `ssma_is_gestor_user` and the modal `ssmaCanManageOccurrences`; no further issues. Let me now review the changed block at lines 11639-11700; the added property arrays: `ssmaMemberIdByUserIdCache` and `ssmaImmediateLeaderMemberIdsCache` are instance-level caches. The immediate leader cache is a single-company cache (not keyed per company). This controller is a request-scoped controller, and the "multi-company" path might exist? Actually managers (tenant admins) may load data across subsidiaries? In SSMA dashboard scope, there's network subsidiaries in action plan; but that's another area (plano acao) and occurs in a different method not used for the event manager logic. Given controller instances are per request, caches reset anyway. Not a real issue. Wait, are Symfony controllers singleton per request? Yes; each HTTP request instantiates controller once, so property caches are per-request. Fine. Now let me look at how `resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId` is used for building defaults: In the big builder: ``` $ownImmediateLeaderId = ($company instanceof Company && $user instanceof User) ? $this->resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId($company, $user) : null; $ssmaEventFormDefaults['manager_id'] = $ownImmediateLeaderId; ``` Then this default is sent to Twig `ssma_event_form_defaults`. In the modal JS, `window.SSMA_EVENT_FORM_DEFAULTS` presumably. Then defaultManagerId used in evSyncReportedByFieldForType. Also, earlier `syncEvTagHiddens()` etc. That means on create, default manager = own leader. On new event creation, the JS preselects own leader. For the modal to render select with that preselected, options must contain own leader. If own leader is null (no superior) and canChange false, field empty but disabled. Could break server save for scoped user (403). Confirmed finding #1. Consider the scenario where the user CAN change (Gestor de Equipe). Default is own leader, but own leader maybe not within their own team scope? They can change to a leader in team. Fine. Now let me search for other important items in the diff I may have skipped: There's a big change at around 13377 in the diff where the removal of previous conditions and building of the options etc. But there might be a logic issue regarding `$allMembersForEventPeople` no longer being scoped: previously under team scope they filtered the involved-person list to team members; now they removed that filter (deleted block) and just set managerScopeIds. Wait check the diff for 12834-... In the hunk they removed the filter: ``` - $allowedMemberMap = $this->collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams($company, $occurrenceTeamFilterIds); - $allMembersForEventPeople = array_values(array_filter( - $allMembers, - static fn (array $m): bool => isset($allowedMemberMap[(int) ($m['id'] ?? 0)]) - )); ``` So `$allMembersForEventPeople` is no longer restricted to team members when `$applyTeamEventScope` true. Wait but `_membersForModal = ssma_apply_team_event_scope ? all_members_for_event_people : allMembers`. Previously the modal's member options (people involved, injured person pickers) were limited to members in the team scope. Now they removed that filtering and `all_members_for_event_people` stays as the full `$allMembers`. Is that a security/scoping regression? Let's analyze: Look at the code hunk at lines ~13177 (in the diff): variable `$teamsForEventModal`; `$allMembersForEventPeople = $allMembers;` initial assignment unchanged? The old diff deleted the re-scoping. So under supervisor's team filter the modal's people list is now company-wide. That would let a supervisor select a person from another team as an injured/involved person in a new ROS/Event while the event team is restricted to their team. Is that a data-leak/scoping issue? Possibly! But note when team scope applied but a supervisor can register only own events; their type-specific allowance. Selecting an involved person outside their team could then create events whose people_ids include members from other teams. Server-side validation: the old deleted validation `validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope` used to check all people ids must be in allowedMembers (team scope). That whole check for people was removed in this PR (from the diff for validation replaced by manager leader checks). Wait let me re-check the diff near 10424: old validation had code verifying each person in `people_ids` belongs to allowed members. That code was deleted in this diff and replaced by the manager-leader checks! Original code before diff (lines removed): ``` - $peopleRaw = $details['people_ids'] ?? ''; - ... - foreach ($peopleIds as $pid) { - if (!isset($allowedMembers[$pid])) { - return 'As pessoas envolvidas devem pertencer às suas equipes.'; - } - } ``` Yes! They deleted the check that "As pessoas envolvidas devem pertencer às suas equipes." and replaced with only manager checks. This is significant: previously the scope validation ensured `people_ids` (involved people) belong to the user's teams. Now this server-side check is GONE, and the frontend no longer restricts `allMembersForEventPeople` to the team scope (the filter was deleted in the modal options). That means a Supervisor/Gestor de Equipe can create an event with an involved person who belongs to another team outside their scope. That is a real scoping regression and data integrity issue. Wait but maybe the removal of the people check was intentional because now people involved may be the injured/affected that can be from another team? Let's reconsider: The supervisor's event team is scoped to their teams, but ROS/involved person could be from another team (e.g., reporting a hazard that affects someone in another team)? Business-wise supervisors may register occurrences for their team; but a supervisor might register an accident that involves a member from a different team (cross-team accident). Hmm. Actually, let me look at git context for that specific removed validation. The old code at the start of `validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope` also checked people_ids. Deletion removes restriction of people to team scope. There may have been a deliberate business decision to drop the people check because the responsible person for new rule is the immediate leader; but why remove people checks? This PR focuses on "Gestor responsável = líder imediato". The change to validation replaced people membership validation with leader logic, effectively relaxing scoping for involved people. Combined with the removal of the allMembersForEventPeople filter (which previously restricted the modal's person selects to team members), a supervisor can now pick involved people across the whole company. This may be intended to allow accidents to involve any employee, but is it within scope of the change? This could be a regression worth flagging as "scoping loss" - especially the removal of `$allMembersForEventPeople` filter and of the people validation. However, we should double check that some other validation still ensures involved people are employees of the company (basic sanity) and that the scope restriction for the team is not intended to restrict "involved people". Let me see the previous lines near the original context of this validation method (the people check deleted) and the area filter: Also, the area-scope version in the listing builder previously filtered `allMembersForEventPeople` by area when area filter applied: ``` - $allMembersForEventPeople = array_values(array_filter( - $allMembersForEventPeople, - static fn (array $m): bool => isset($areaMemberIds[(int) ($m['id'] ?? 0)]) - )); ``` They removed that too, now only `$managerScopeIds` intersected for manager, but people picker uses the full member list when the team scope active. So both the involved-person picks and the modal's people/member options are no longer restricted by scope. Wait actually in the new builder the modal's `_membersForModal` is all_members_for_event_people when `ssma_apply_team_event_scope` true. Since they no longer filter all_members_for_event_people, it stays all members. Hold on - actually what does `ssma_apply_team_event_scope` equal? It's set to true when there's a team filter and/or area filter? Let me check around 13250. `$applyTeamEventScope = $occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== null && $occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== [];` Actually in new diff: ``` $applyTeamEventScope = $occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== null && $occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== []; ... if ($occurrenceAreaFilterIds !== null) { ... $applyTeamEventScope = true; ``` So `_membersForModal` (used for the modal's "all members" list) = all_members_for_event_people = $allMembers for everyone. Actually wait: previously even before this PR the code computed $allMembersForEventPeople filtered by scope when applyTeamEventScope. That filter was removed, so now all members in the company are available in the person/member pickers for the modal — regardless of scope. But `allMembers` could already be full? On listing page, allMembers passed to template may already be filtered? Let's check: In the big builder, `allMembers` is passed to the template; is `allMembers` full company or already restricted? Let's read the code that populates `$allMembers` around 12834 (start of the block).
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 13180, "file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 12810}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 12810-13180
12810|                $teams
12811|            );
12812|            $actionsTaken = $this->loadActionsForOccurrenceDetail($company, $detailOccurrenceId);
12813|            $inspections = [];
12814|            $abordagens = [];
12815|            $horasData = [];
12816|            // Fase B: SSR do detalhe só com membros referenciados (+ gestores do modal).
12817|            if ($this->ssmaMemberSelectDataProvider->shouldFilterToReferencedMembers($scope)) {
12818|                $allMembers = $this->filterSsmaMembersToReferencedForDetail(
12819|                    $allMembers,
12820|                    $occurrences,
12821|                    $actionsTaken,
12822|                    $gestores
12823|                );
12824|            }
12825|        } elseif ($isNetworkHeadWithUnits && $company) {
12826|            $occurrences = $this->loadNetworkOccurrencesForList($company);
12827|            foreach ($this->resolveSsmaNetworkSubsidiaries($company) as $netCompany) {
12828|                if ((int) $netCompany->getId() === (int) $company->getId()) {
12829|                    continue;
12830|                }
12831|                [$extraMembers, $extraTeams] = $this->loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite($netCompany);
12832|                $teamNameByMemberId = [];
12833|                foreach ($extraTeams as $teamRow) {
12834|                    foreach ($teamRow['members'] as $teamMemberId) {
12835|                        $teamMemberId = (int) $teamMemberId;
12836|                        if ($teamMemberId > 0 && !isset($teamNameByMemberId[$teamMemberId])) {
12837|                            $teamNameByMemberId[$teamMemberId] = (string) ($teamRow['name'] ?? '');
12838|                        }
12839|                    }
12840|                }
12841|                foreach ($this->enrichSsmaMemberRowsWithTeamMeta($extraMembers, $teamNameByMemberId) as $extraMember) {
12842|                    $allMembers[] = $extraMember;
12843|                }
12844|            }
12845|            $networkCompanies = $this->resolveSsmaNetworkSubsidiaries($company);
12846|            if ($deferOccurrenceHubHeavyData) {
12847|                $actionsTaken = [];
12848|                $inspections = [];
12849|                $horasData = [];
12850|            } else {
12851|            $actionsTaken = [];
12852|            $inspections  = [];
12853|            foreach ($networkCompanies as $netCompany) {
12854|                [$netMembers, $netTeams] = $this->loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite($netCompany);
12855|                $actionsTaken = array_merge(
12856|                    $actionsTaken,
12857|                    $this->loadActions($netCompany)
12858|                );
12859|                $inspections = array_merge(
12860|                    $inspections,
12861|                    $this->loadInspections($netCompany, $netMembers, $netTeams)
12862|                );
12863|            }
12864|            $horasData = $this->mergeHorasDataForNetworkCompanies($networkCompanies);
12865|            }
12866|        } else {
12867|            $occurrenceListAlreadyPaged = false;
12868|            if ($company && $paginateOccurrenceList) {
12869|                $teamFilterEarly = $this->getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds($company, $user instanceof User ? $user : null);
12870|                $canManageEarly = $this->canManageSsmaOccurrences();
12871|                $isViewerEarly = $this->isSsmaViewer();
12872|                $userTechnicalTypesEarly = $this->resolveUserTechnicalTypes($company, $user, $companyMembers ?? []);
12873|                $isTechEarly = !$canManageEarly
12874|                    && !$isViewerEarly
12875|                    && $teamFilterEarly === []
12876|                    && $userTechnicalTypesEarly !== [];
12877|                $needsOccurrencePostFilter = ($teamFilterEarly !== null && !$isTechEarly)
12878|                    || $isTechEarly
12879|                    || (!$canManageEarly && !$isViewerEarly && $teamFilterEarly === null && !$isTechEarly);
12880|
12881|                $pageSize = SsmaViewDataScope::OCCURRENCE_LIST_PAGE_SIZE;
12882|                $occurrencesListPage = $scope->listPage;
12883|                $offset = ($occurrencesListPage - 1) * $pageSize;
12884|
12885|                if (!$needsOccurrencePostFilter) {
12886|                    // Visão completa: hidrata só a página pedida (SQL UNION + findBy ids).
12887|                    $occurrencesListTotal = $this->countCompanyOccurrencesAndEvents($company);
12888|                    $occurrences = $this->loadOccurrences($company, $allMembers, $teams, $pageSize, $offset);
12889|                    $occurrencesListHasMore = ($offset + count($occurrences)) < $occurrencesListTotal;
12890|                    $occurrenceListAlreadyPaged = true;
12891|                } elseif ($isTechEarly && $userTechnicalTypesEarly !== []) {
12892|                    // Técnico especialista: pagina direto em SQL filtrando por tipo — evita
12893|                    // carregar todas as ocorrências da empresa (timeout em bases grandes).
12894|                    $occurrencesListTotal = $this->countCompanyOccurrencesAndEventsByTypes($company, $userTechnicalTypesEarly);
12895|                    $occurrences = $this->loadOccurrences($company, $allMembers, $teams, $pageSize, $offset, $userTechnicalTypesEarly);
12896|                    $occurrencesListHasMore = ($offset + count($occurrences)) < $occurrencesListTotal;
12897|                    $occurrenceListAlreadyPaged = true;
12898|                } else {
12899|                    // Supervisor com equipe / membro regular: precisa de pós-filtro PHP.
12900|                    // Para supervisores com equipe: aplica filtro SQL (team_id, manager_id) e pagina
12901|                    // diretamente via LIMIT/OFFSET — evita carregar/hidratar N mil entidades.
12902|                    if ($teamFilterEarly !== null) {
12903|                        $teamIdInts = array_values(array_unique(array_map('intval', $teamFilterEarly)));
12904|                        $memberIdsForTeam = [];
12905|                        foreach ($teams as $tmEntry) {
12906|                            if (in_array((int) ($tmEntry['id'] ?? -1), $teamIdInts, true)) {
12907|                                foreach ($tmEntry['members'] ?? [] as $tmMid) {
12908|                                    $memberIdsForTeam[] = (int) $tmMid;
12909|                                }
12910|                            }
12911|                        }
12912|                        // Supervisor sem equipe atribuída: adiciona próprio membro para ver onde é gestor/envolvido.
12913|                        if ($teamIdInts === []) {
12914|                            $selfMWin = $user instanceof User ? $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user) : null;
12915|                            $selfMIdWin = (int) ($selfMWin?->getId() ?? 0);
12916|                            if ($selfMIdWin > 0) {
12917|                                $memberIdsForTeam[] = $selfMIdWin;
12918|                            }
12919|                        }
12920|                        $memberIdsForTeam = array_values(array_unique($memberIdsForTeam));
12921|
12922|                        if ($teamIdInts !== [] || $memberIdsForTeam !== []) {
12923|                            // SQL paginado com filtro de equipe: carrega exatamente $pageSize registros.
12924|                            $occurrencesListTotal = $this->countCompanyOccurrencesForTeam($company, $teamIdInts, $memberIdsForTeam);
12925|                            $occurrences = $this->loadOccurrences($company, $allMembers, $teams, $pageSize, $offset, [], $teamIdInts, $memberIdsForTeam);
12926|                            $occurrencesListHasMore = ($offset + count($occurrences)) < $occurrencesListTotal;
12927|                            $occurrenceListAlreadyPaged = true;
12928|                        } else {
12929|                            // Sem IDs concretos: cap conservador; PHP post-filter aplicará depois.
12930|                            $occurrences = $this->loadOccurrences($company, $allMembers, $teams, 500);
12931|                        }
12932|                    } else {
12933|                        // Membro regular (teamFilter=null): cap 500 para evitar OOM; PHP post-filter após.
12934|                        $occurrences = $this->loadOccurrences($company, $allMembers, $teams, 500);
12935|                    }
12936|                }
12937|            } else {
12938|                $occurrences = $company ? $this->loadOccurrences($company, $allMembers, $teams) : [];
12939|            }
12940|            if ($occurrences !== []) {
12941|                // Sempre anexa cause_tree_id na página atual (UX: botão Causa aparece no SSR).
12942|                // Painel/inspeções/horas continuam deferred; só o mapa de árvores volta no hub.
12943|                if ($company instanceof Company) {
12944|                    $itemsForTrees = [];
12945|                    foreach ($occurrences as $occRow) {
12946|                        $entityId = (int) ($occRow['id'] ?? 0);
12947|                        if ($entityId <= 0) {
12948|                            continue;
12949|                        }
12950|                        $itemsForTrees[] = [
12951|                            'id' => $entityId,
12952|                            'is_ssma_event' => !empty($occRow['is_ssma_event']),
12953|                        ];
12954|                    }
12955|                    if ($itemsForTrees !== []) {
12956|                        $treeMeta = $this->ssmaCauseTreeService->resolveEntityTreeMetaBatch(
12957|                            (int) $company->getId(),
12958|                            $itemsForTrees
12959|                        );
12960|                        foreach ($occurrences as $idx => $occRow) {
12961|                            $entityId = (int) ($occRow['id'] ?? 0);
12962|                            $key = (!empty($occRow['is_ssma_event']) ? 'e:' : 'o:') . $entityId;
12963|                            $occurrences[$idx]['cause_tree_id'] = $treeMeta[$key]['cause_tree_id'] ?? null;
12964|                        }
12965|                    }
12966|                }
12967|                $occurrences = $this->enrichOccurrencesCommitteeTriggerFlags($occurrences, $company);
12968|                $occurrences = $this->enrichOccurrencesGravityLabels($occurrences);
12969|            }
12970|            if ($deferOccurrenceHubHeavyData) {
12971|                $actionsTaken = [];
12972|                $inspections = [];
12973|                $horasData = [];
12974|            } else {
12975|            $actionsTaken = $company ? $this->loadActions($company) : [];
12976|            $inspections  = $company ? $this->loadInspections($company, $allMembers, $teams) : [];
12977|            $horasData    = $company ? $this->loadHorasData($company) : [];
12978|            }
12979|        }
12980|        if ($needsPreventionCollections) {
12981|            $abordagens = $company ? $this->loadAbordagens($company) : [];
12982|        }
12983|        $occurrenceUiMeta = $this->getMockOccurrenceMetadata();
12984|
12985|        $userTechnicalTypes = $company
12986|            ? $this->resolveUserTechnicalTypes($company, $user, $companyMembers ?? [])
12987|            : [];
12988|        $ssmaCanManageOccurrences = $this->canManageSsmaOccurrences();
12989|        $ssmaCanAccessSupervisorSurface = $this->canAccessSsmaSupervisorSurface();
12990|        $ssmaCanAccessPreventionPanelAndMetas = $this->canAccessPreventionDashboardAndMetasTabs();
12991|        $ssmaCanAccessOccurrencePanel = $ssmaCanManageOccurrences || $this->isSsmaViewer();
12992|        // Supervisores veem a aba Automações mas não criam; o botão de criação usa ssmaCanManageOccurrences
12993|        $ssmaCanAccessOccurrenceAutomations = $ssmaCanManageOccurrences || $this->isSsmaViewer();
12994|        $ssmaCanManageConfig = $this->canManageSsmaConfig();
12995|        $ssmaCanManagePermissions = $this->canManageSsmaPermissions();
12996|        // ssmaCanCreateLinkedActions: botão "Criar ação" na aba Ocorrências e occurrence_view.
12997|        // Brenda: Supervisor só visualiza (dash/painel). Criar/editar fica com gestor/admin
12998|        // e Gestor de Equipe (override abaixo). Membro comum não cria.
12999|        $ssmaCanCreateLinkedActions = $this->canMutateSsmaActionPlan();
13000|        $ssmaCanMutateActionPlan = $ssmaCanCreateLinkedActions;
13001|        // ssmaCanCreateCauseTree: Supervisor ?? SOMENTE LEITURA na Árvore de Causas (planilha).
13002|        // NÃO incluir isSsmaViewer() aqui. Usa produto ssma-cause-tree (não can_create de ssma-occurrences).
13003|        $ssmaCanCreateCauseTree = $this->canCreateSsmaCauseTree();
13004|        $ssmaCanCreateAuthorization = $ssmaCanManageOccurrences;
13005|        $ssmaCanEditHorasTrabalhadas = $this->canEditSsmaHorasTrabalhadas();
13006|
13007|        // Tag SSMA do colaborador — sempre resolve (ROLE_MANAGER de plataforma ≠ perfil SSMA).
13008|        $ssmaProductTagName = null;
13009|        $memberForTagCheck = null;
13010|        $ssmaPreventionProductTagName = null;
13011|        if ($company && $user instanceof User) {
13012|            $memberForTagCheck = $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user);
13013|            if ($memberForTagCheck) {
13014|                $resolvedTag = $this->resolveSsmaProductPermissionTagForMember($memberForTagCheck);
13015|                if ($resolvedTag) {
13016|                    $ssmaProductTagName = $resolvedTag->getName();
13017|                }
13018|                if ($this->memberIsSsmaGestorAdministrador($memberForTagCheck)) {
13019|                    $ssmaProductTagName = 'Gestor Administrador';
13020|                }
13021|                $ssmaPreventionProductTagName = $this->ssmaPreventionHubAccessService
13022|                    ->resolvePreventionProductTagName($memberForTagCheck);
13023|            }
13024|        }
13025|
13026|        // Membro/Inspetor: visão de pessoa física (matriz de tipos + registrar).
13027|        // Só strip se tiver ROLE_USER (Palloma). Conta admin empresa sem ROLE_USER (Aura) mantém abas.
13028|        // Tenant / SUPER_ADMIN mantêm abas mesmo com tag Membro (regressão Felipe).
13029|        $ssmaIsPlainProductMemberUi = SsmaOccurrenceCreatePermissionService::shouldStripOccurrenceManagementTabsUi(
13030|            $ssmaProductTagName,
13031|            $this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN'),
13032|            $this->isGranted('ROLE_TENANT'),
13033|            $user instanceof User && in_array('ROLE_USER', $user->getRoles(), true)
13034|        );
13035|        if ($ssmaIsPlainProductMemberUi && !$this->memberIsSsmaGestorAdministrador($memberForTagCheck)) {
13036|            $ssmaCanManageOccurrences = false;
13037|            $ssmaCanAccessSupervisorSurface = false;
13038|            $ssmaCanAccessPreventionPanelAndMetas = false;
13039|            $ssmaCanAccessOccurrencePanel = false;
13040|            $ssmaCanAccessOccurrenceAutomations = false;
13041|            $ssmaCanManageConfig = false;
13042|            $ssmaCanManagePermissions = false;
13043|            $ssmaCanCreateLinkedActions = false;
13044|            $ssmaCanCreateAuthorization = false;
13045|        }
13046|
13047|        $loggedMemberForCauseTree = ($company && $user instanceof User)
13048|            ? $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user)
13049|            : null;
13050|
13051|        // Especialistas técnicos (SsmaPermissionTagMember) e gestores/supervisores podem visualizar.
13052|        // Membro/Inspetor com acesso só via mapa legado tipo/equipe NÃO recebem o botão na listagem.
13053|        $ssmaCanViewCauseTree = $ssmaCanCreateCauseTree
13054|            || $this->isSsmaViewer()
13055|            || in_array($ssmaProductTagName, ['Gestor Administrador', 'Gestor de Equipe', 'Supervisor de Equipe', 'Supervisor'], true)
13056|            || ($loggedMemberForCauseTree && $company && $this->hasSsmaTechnicalCauseTreeAccess($loggedMemberForCauseTree, $company));
13057|
13058|        // Hub Ocorrências — botão "Registrar ocorrência" (empty state / FAB): Membro não cria (planilha),
13059|        // mesmo com can_create na tag. Só roles de gestão na empresa ou tag Gestor de Equipe / G. Administrador com manage.
13060|        // Reutiliza $ssmaProductTagName (já corrigido por memberIsSsmaGestorAdministrador).
13061|        $ssmaProductTagNameForRegister = $ssmaProductTagName;
13062|        $ssmaCanRegisterNewOccurrence = $this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN')
13063|            || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER')
13064|            || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR')
13065|            || \in_array($ssmaProductTagNameForRegister, ['Gestor de Equipe', 'Gestor Administrador'], true)
13066|            // Permissão padrão do Membro: registrar a própria ocorrência.
13067|            || $this->canMemberRegisterOwnOccurrence($company, $user);
13068|
13069|        $loggedMemberForOccurrence = ($company && $user instanceof User)
13070|            ? $this->getCurrentCompanyMember($company, $user)
13071|            : null;
13072|        $ssmaAllowedCreateTypes = ($company && $user instanceof User)
13073|            ? $this->ssmaOccurrenceCreatePermissionService->resolveAllowedCreateTypes(
13074|                $loggedMemberForOccurrence,
13075|                $user,
13076|                $company,
13077|                $this->ssmaOccurrenceTypeConfig->getAllowedTypeKeys($company),
13078|                $ssmaCanManageOccurrences,
13079|            )
13080|            : [];
13081|        if (!$ssmaCanRegisterNewOccurrence && $ssmaAllowedCreateTypes !== []) {
13082|            $ssmaCanRegisterNewOccurrence = true;
13083|        }
13084|
13085|        $occurrenceTeamFilterIds = $this->getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds($company, $user);
13086|        $areaScope = $this->getSsmaPreventionAreaScope($company, $user);
13087|        $occurrenceAreaFilterIds = $areaScope->isRestricted() ? $areaScope->areaIds() : null;
13088|        $viewerTeamIds = $this->getSsmaViewerTeamIds();
13089|
13090|        // ── Detecção de Supervisor/Gestor de Equipe via tag SSMA ──────────────────────────────
13091|        // Usuários com ROLE_USER + tag SSMA (sem ROLE_MANAGER_VIEWER global) não são detectados pelas
13092|        // funções baseadas em role. Identificamos o perfil pelo nome da tag para ajustar flags de UI.
13093|        $ssmaIsTagTeamSupervisor = in_array($ssmaProductTagName, ['Supervisor de Equipe', 'Supervisor'], true);
13094|        $ssmaIsTagTeamGestor     = $ssmaProductTagName === 'Gestor de Equipe';
13095|        $ssmaIsTagAreaSupervisor = $ssmaProductTagName === SsmaAreaLimitationScope::TAG_SUPERVISOR_AREA;
13096|        $ssmaIsTagAreaGestor     = $ssmaProductTagName === SsmaAreaLimitationScope::TAG_GESTOR_AREA;
13097|        $ssmaIsPreventionTagTeamSupervisor = in_array($ssmaPreventionProductTagName, ['Supervisor de Equipe', 'Supervisor'], true);
13098|        $ssmaIsPreventionTagTeamGestor = $ssmaPreventionProductTagName === 'Gestor de Equipe';
13099|
13100|        // Painel + Metas: libera para Sup/G. de Equipe/Área e Gestor Administrador (ocorrências + ssma-prevention)
13101|        if (!$ssmaCanAccessPreventionPanelAndMetas
13102|            && (
13103|                $ssmaIsTagTeamSupervisor
13104|                || $ssmaIsTagTeamGestor
13105|                || $ssmaIsTagAreaSupervisor
13106|                || $ssmaIsTagAreaGestor
13107|                || $ssmaProductTagName === 'Gestor Administrador'
13108|                || $ssmaIsPreventionTagTeamSupervisor
13109|                || $ssmaIsPreventionTagTeamGestor
13110|                || $ssmaPreventionProductTagName === 'Gestor Administrador'
13111|            )
13112|        ) {
13113|            $ssmaCanAccessPreventionPanelAndMetas = true;
13114|        }
13115|
13116|        // Membro/Inspetor (pessoa física / Palloma): não acessa Painel nem Metas.
13117|        // Conta admin empresa sem ROLE_USER (Aura), Tenant e SUPER_ADMIN mantêm — mesmo contrato das abas de Ocorrências.
13118|        if (SsmaOccurrenceCreatePermissionService::shouldStripOccurrenceManagementTabsUi(
13119|            $ssmaProductTagName,
13120|            $this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN'),
13121|            $this->isGranted('ROLE_TENANT'),
13122|            $user instanceof User && in_array('ROLE_USER', $user->getRoles(), true)
13123|        )) {
13124|            $ssmaCanAccessPreventionPanelAndMetas = false;
13125|        }
13126|
13127|        // Modal + Evento: título/status ocultos na criação para todos os perfis (Figma Etapa 0).
13128|        // Na edição o JS (evApplyAuraTitleStatusVisibility) reexibe conforme o modo.
13129|        $ssmaHideEventTitleStatusOnCreate = true;
13130|
13131|        // ssmaIsTeamViewer: true quando o usuário opera com escopo de equipe (via role SSMA OU via tag SSMA)
13132|        // Usado para sinalizar ao template que os dados estáo limitados ?? equipe.
13133|        $ssmaIsTeamViewerFlag = $viewerTeamIds !== null || $ssmaIsTagTeamSupervisor || $ssmaIsTagTeamGestor
13134|            || $ssmaIsTagAreaSupervisor || $ssmaIsTagAreaGestor;
13135|
13136|        // ssmaCanCreatePreventionItems: Gestor de Equipe/Área e Gestor Administrador via tag SSMA
13137|        // também podem registrar inspeções/abordagens (ssmaCanManageOccurrences = true via tag).
13138|        $ssmaCanCreatePreventionItems = (
13139|            $this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN')
13140|            || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER')
13141|            || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR')
13142|            || (
13143|                $ssmaCanManageOccurrences
13144|                && ($ssmaIsTagTeamGestor || $ssmaIsTagAreaGestor || $ssmaProductTagName === 'Gestor Administrador')
13145|            )
13146|        );
13147|
13148|        // ssmaCanEditPreventionContent: controla botões Editar/Finalizar/Deletar em inspeções e abordagens
13149|        // e o botão "Configuração" na aba Metas.
13150|        // Supervisor registra/edita o próprio conteúdo (can_mutate por item); gestão edita todos.
13151|        $ssmaCanEditPreventionContent = $ssmaCanManageOccurrences
13152|            && !$this->isSsmaViewer()
13153|            && !$ssmaIsTagTeamSupervisor
13154|            && !$ssmaIsTagAreaSupervisor;
13155|        $ssmaPreventionMutateOwnOnly = false;
13156|
13157|        // Configurações da aba Prevenção Ativa: Sup/Gestor de Equipe ou Área não acessam (planilha: "Não acessa")
13158|        if ($ssmaIsTagTeamSupervisor || $ssmaIsTagTeamGestor || $ssmaIsTagAreaSupervisor || $ssmaIsTagAreaGestor) {
13159|            $ssmaCanManageConfig = false;
13160|        }
13161|
13162|        // G. Equipe via tag SSMA pode criar ação (Plano de Ação).
13163|        // Árvore de causas: {@see canCreateSsmaCauseTree()} já cobre Gestor de Equipe.
13164|        if ($ssmaIsTagTeamGestor || $ssmaIsTagAreaGestor) {
13165|            $ssmaCanCreateLinkedActions = true;
13166|            $ssmaCanMutateActionPlan = true;
13167|        }
13168|
13169|        // Tabela de metas por pessoa (aba Metas): edição global só para gestão; membro com can_create não gere metas alheias.
13170|        $ssmaCanEditPreventionMetasTable = $company && $user instanceof User
13171|            && $this->canEditPreventionMetasTableForCurrentUser($company, $user);
13172|
13173|        // ssmaPreventionCanCreateLinkedActions: botão "Criar ação" em Inspeções e Abordagem.
13174|        // Alinhado com ssmaCanCreateLinkedActions (Plano de Ações): quem não pode criar
13175|        // ação no Plano de Ações também não pode criar em inspeção/abordagem/árvore.
13176|        $ssmaPreventionCanCreateLinkedActions = $ssmaCanCreateLinkedActions;
13177|
13178|        $teamsForEventModal = $teams;
13179|        $allMembersForEventPeople = $allMembers;
13180|        $ssmaEventFormDefaults = ['manager_id' => null, 'team_id' => null];
Request #66 deepseek-v4-flash P:92.41K C:3.96K CR:85.76K CW:0 36181ms
Reasoning
Now I see: at line 13178-13180: ``` $teamsForEventModal = $teams; $allMembersForEventPeople = $allMembers; ``` Then old code (removed) filtered by team & area. New code only handles teams filtering for teamsForEventModal and managerScopeIds. So `$allMembersForEventPeople` remains full company list. But then what is `_membersForModal`? Line 1310 in occurrence_view: `ssma_apply_team_event_scope|default(false) ? all_members_for_event_people : allMembers`. But in the listing template `index.html.twig` line 110: same. So if the current user has team/area scope, the modal's members list = `all_members_for_event_people`. Previously, it was scoped to teams; now it is the full member list (because $allMembersForEventPeople not filtered anymore). Wait, actually previously `$allMembersForEventPeople` was initialised to $allMembers and filtered when applyTeamEventScope. But this code was in a data builder shared for both listing and detail; and detail gets all members limited (filterSsmaMembersToReferencedForDetail) only when scope is not full... Actually that only applies on the detail for referenced members. On listing, `allMembers` is likely full company. Now, the key question: was the removal of the "people involved must belong to the teams" server-side check intended? Let me carefully consider how the event payload is normalized for people. Maybe the team-scope validation of people was considered too restrictive and intentional to drop because ROS for cross-team now possible? Hmm. Given the PR is about audit of permissions and implementing corrections; a specific meeting date etc. It's plausible that the removal of the people check was deliberate: "gestor responsável precisa ser líder imediato..." However, the deletion of the people check plus removal of the modal person filters together would let any team supervisor choose people from anywhere in the company. That might be intended since "pessoas envolvidas" can be from anywhere? But the visible listing for supervisors only shows team-scope occurrences... If the supervisor registers a ROS involving a person from team B, then the person's own team supervisor might not see it (person not in their team and their team not the team_id). But if the event's team_id = the supervisor's team A (the site/area?), the supervisor sees it; the person in team B's own supervisor sees nothing. Not a cross-company leak; only within company. Wait, is this change a real regression relative to the intended behavior? Let me check the diff context more: In the earlier lines, was this the actual behavior in the previous version? Actually the deletion shows these were in `applyTeamEventScope` block originally added specifically to limit members for modal to scoped teams. The new logic replaced the whole concept with only limiting the managers list. So yes the PR intentionally narrowed the scope filtering to manager list only, and the person pickers remain full company. Hmm, given the uncertainty about intent, the more defensible claim relates to the removed server-side validation of people_ids belonging to teams: deleting a server-side authorization check with no replacement is a potential scope/security regression (a supervisor can now reference people from outside scope in the event payload even by direct API). That's the kind of "authorization enforced in client" issue that could be flagged. But is that in scope with product rule? The rules say supervisors have an area of view; they can register own occurrences only (canMutateOwn). But creating event with person outside team is creating data beyond scope. But hold on — the removed check was in validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope which applies only when scope non-null (supervisor with team scope). So supervisors can create events but were restricted to people in teams. That might have been considered too restrictive because "acidente" can involve any employee from the company, e.g., a ROS raised by supervisor on behalf of their own team member only though. Since supervisors register own events (for self?), ROS by a supervisor for their own team member? Actually members register their own events ("Registrar a própria ocorrência"). Supervisors register for their team members. Involving people from other teams perhaps not desired. Actually, hold on: the whole old check might have been the direct outcome of previous bug where a member chooses a manager outside their teams. Removing it might cause regression: a member/supervisor can now freely add people ids from outside the scope. Let me check whether there is a *different* server-side check remaining (maybe the payload check people ids are from the company). In SsmaEventValidator or service there could be checks. But scoping: the requirement that involved people belong to the user's team was likely an important SSMA rule. Given ambiguity, I'll flag with medium severity, noting the parallel removal of the modal filter makes the scope restriction effectively client-only... wait client no longer restricts either, so there is no restriction at all now. Actually it seems intentional from the product to broaden the people selection to company-wide while keeping the event/team restricted. But then why would the manager options remain restricted? Hmm. Consider what the modal's person picker is for - "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" for accidents: the injured person could be from a different team in the same company (e.g., subcontractor from other team area) or even not a member? The previous restriction to team was likely there because supervisors should only register for people in their team. This PR doesn't mention changing that rule. So removing the filter may be an unintended regression. This is worth flagging as an area to verify, because combined with deletion of the server check, the scoping guarantee described in the code comment "Supervisor/Gestor de Equipe: filtra modais pelas equipes do cadastro" was removed. Actually, wait — let me carefully read the deleted code in diff for the area scope too. In the area block they removed: ``` - $allMembersForEventPeople = array_values(array_filter( - $allMembersForEventPeople, - static fn (array $m): bool => isset($areaMemberIds[(int) ($m['id'] ?? 0)]) - )); ``` And they also previously had team filtering. In the new code, they filter nothing for allMembersForEventPeople. So for a user with team scope + area scope the members list in the modal is the whole company. BUT maybe in the new builder they no longer pass all_members_for_event_people? Wait they kept `$allMembersForEventPeople` var and template still uses it. So the full list remains in the modal. So yes. But is `$allMembers` (full) also passed to the person picker even without the event scope for normal manager? For normal managers (no team filter), the modal uses `allMembers` — company wide anyway. So the only behavior change is for supervisors with team scope, previously they got only members of their teams; now they get everyone. That could be intentional or not. The original comment says "Supervisor/Gestor de Equipe: filtra modais pelas equipes do cadastro (lista vazia = sem equipe — não zera selects)." Hmm. I need to verify the current behavior of a supervisor "novo evento" type flow: type ROS for person? In ROS flow the "Relatado por" manager is now a locked immediate leader. People picker would now include company-wide. Let me weigh: The deleted code's comment (from hunk context): ``` - // Gestor responsável: escopo da empresa (tags/roles), não só membros da equipe do supervisor - $gestoresForEventModal = $this->buildSsmaEventModalGestores(...null); ``` Wait actually in the team block they removed the gestor filtering and the member filter. But the manager list originally was team-scoped? hmm. Given the review is complex, I think the strongest NEW valid findings to add are: A) Regression risk: the removal of the involved-people server-side check (`As pessoas envolvidas devem pertencer às suas equipes.`) without replacement. Also the member select for "Pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" now unrestricted for supervisors with team scope (client) so no server restriction at all. Suggest clarifying intent and restoring at least one layer. — Severity medium. Actually wait: Let me check whether `validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope` even ran on create for supervisors: only when scope non-null. Yes for supervisors with teams (scope != null). And previously people check ran. Now removed, so direct API can create events referencing people from anywhere. But let me double-check: maybe the deleted check was part of this PR but that's precisely because ROS/QA "envolvidos" can be cross-team, and product now wants that. Hmm hard to be sure. The user task said review scope: "audit of permissions for occurrences and implement related corrections." The primary intent is about immediate leader manager. Possibly the people check removal was collateral damage in replacing the block; the new validation doesn't include people. Since manager is now always the leader (in scope), the "people" restriction was dropped. There's a real possibility this is a regression. I'll report as medium but phrase carefully as needs confirmation. B) Performance: `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser` reloads `loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite` (full company members+teams) inside the listing build for every supervisor's dashboard, duplicating the same data already loaded by the caller. Also the event `findBy` returns all events created by the user; enrich fallback etc. Report low/medium perf. C) Another actual new bug I should check: In the elseif at 13503, for users with team/area scope, the occurrences returned are possibly ordered by DB already; appending new events after the list may place duplicates/ordering inconsistent (newly appended events at the end, not sorted by event_datetime). Sorting issue? The list order may rely on sorting. For supervisor, original $occurrences were sorted DESC by date; appends push user events at end regardless of date, so ordering breaks, showing recent event at bottom. Is that an important defect? Possibly a minor UX/ordering regression: the created-by-current-user events (that would otherwise be at the top given most recent) appended at the end. Actually, append function puts them at end after existing. If the user's own events are typically the most recent (just registered), they appear at bottom of the page. Not sure this matters but could be a defect in pagination ordering. Also with pagination: if occurrences paginated (page 2 loaded), appending events created by user from entire set could duplicate across pages, or push duplicates. But for supervisors the occurrences list is paginated to page; if user created events on page 2 they might still be appended (query fetches all events created by user). This could cause duplicates: event may already be on current page, dedup by 'e'.id covers it. But if event belongs to page 3, it is not loaded yet; append query returns it anyway and shows on page 1 even though it's actually on page 3 by ordering. Might lead to weirdness but matches "always include my events" intent; list pagination total not adjusted (total based on SQL count). Some duplicates/ordering with paging could be a mild bug but I'd need deep knowledge of pagination flow. Too speculative. Skip. Let me double check the DQL on collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds: uses IDENTITY(cm.superior). `superior` field of CompanyMembers references another CompanyMembers; IDENTITY works on many-to-one. OK. Wait - possible issue: DQL `DISTINCT IDENTITY(cm.superior) AS sid`. `superior` is probably nullable many-to-one. Query builder with andWhere('cm.superior IS NOT NULL') and isRemoved=0. Fine. Now for `buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions`, since it adds manager ids from existing occurrences, but occurrences array passed here in the new code is the listing's `$occurrences` — which for a member listing was already filtered by `filterOccurrencesForMember` AFTER this block? Let's check ordering: The modal options built at lines ~13178-13220. The member filter (13481-13507) happens later, after occurrences filtered. The option builder at 13210 uses occurrences BEFORE member filter and BEFORE team post filter at 13303? Wait, the occurrences list was already filtered at 13303 (team scope) before build options at 13210? Order in code: 13178-13260 (build option + team modal defaults) then 13278 occurrences filter at 13303, then 13481 filterOccurrencesForMember. So the options builder receives occurrences from DB load (unfiltered). This includes manager ids from all loaded occurrences (company up to 500 in some paths). Thus the responsible manager options might include leaders/managers from any occurrence in the loaded set — meaning any manager of any occurrence company-wide (or network?) could appear in the member's select options. Actually options = leaders ∩ scope plus own leader plus existing manager_ids from occurrences. So a supervisor with team scope, whose leader list in team scope, PLUS manager_ids from the whole loaded company set could show managers outside their team. Hmm wait: manager_ids added to `keep` regardless of scope. This ensures editing existing events that reference out-of-scope manager still renders select value. For a member (locked), it doesn't matter. For a Gestor de Equipe who can change, options include out-of-scope managers from occurrences not even in their scope? But the occurrences were loaded (company-wide SQL with the post filter applied later at 13303; options built BEFORE filter at 13303? Actually no, wait; options build at 13178 happens before 13278's filter at 13303. So yes. But for scoped users, we want the manager options to be limited to scope (leader within scope + own leader). Adding manager ids from out-of-scope occurrences would allow a Gestor de Equipe to pick a manager from another team as "Gestor responsável". Server-side applySsmaEventManagerAssignment, though, re-restricts allowed to scope leaders + own leader + existing. Wait, apply allows requested if `isset($allowed[$requested])` OR `$requested === $existingManagerId`. So even if the out-of-scope manager appears in options, assignment denies unless it equals existing manager on the event. So the SSO display may include out-of-scope managers in options but actual save rejects them. Slight mismatch UX but not a security hole. Hmm wait, actually for a scoped user selecting another manager via dropdown (options includes that other manager), then server assignment: requested not in allowed and != existing → fallback to existing (which is likely own leader default on create) - the chosen out-of-scope manager silently ignored! That's confusing UX bug: select shows a manager but server overrides to own leader silently, returning success with different manager. Because when canSelect is true and requested out of allowed, code: ``` if ($requested > 0 && (isset($allowed[$requested]) || $requested === $existingManagerId)) { assign; return; } if ($existingManagerId > 0) { assign existing; return; } if ($ownLeaderId >0) assign ownLeader; return data; // manager unset ``` So if the user picked an out-of-scope manager (they don't know it's out of scope), the server silently sets a different manager or leaves empty. This yields silent data change / form value mismatch. However, to have out-of-scope manager options appear, the options must include manager ids from occurrences. For a Gestor de Equipe on listing, occurrences loaded may be the entire company list (when no early SQL filter is applied? For scoped supervisors early SQL filter is applied for team filter paths... wait in the paging branch 12902-12931, team filter early is applied in SQL, so occurrences would be already filtered to team scope before the builder. And the paginated SQL filters by team manager_id etc. So manager ids from occurrences that reach options are team-scoped plus "self" ones. When the user has teams, they'd only see managers relevant to their scope (since filtered). For area-scoped only (occurrenceTeamFilterIds null) but area filter is a post filter? Area filter applied at 13347 after options built, so the occurrence manager ids could include managers outside area. So for an area-scoped manager, options may include managers outside area. That is getting deep; given server still restricts, it's only UX/consistency. Given the confusion and the confirmed finding 2 already covers area assignment mismatch. I'll avoid. Let me look for an actual logic bug in the filter at 13311 to note: uses `(int)($o['created_by_member_id'] ?? 0) === $viewerMemberIdForCreated`. This makes members' own events visible within team scope branch. Fine. Now let me look at another area: the changes around 22687 that added superior_id to $allMembers rows. Wait they add `superior_id` to members list rows for loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite. That's just data; possibly unused? Could cause leak? Not an issue. Let me consider the DQL using superior left joins maybe needed. Now, since most new potentially-reportable issues might be borderline, I should focus on reporting robust, real findings: 1. Regression: Removed people_ids team-scope server validation + removed modal member-scope filter (allMembersForEventPeople) → supervisors can include out-of-scope people; no server guard left. This is a change in security scoping not covered by confirmed findings. Actually we need to confirm that these old lines were indeed in the diff (yes, both removed). And new code doesn't re-add. Let me verify current validation code doesn't have people check elsewhere in the create flow after this. Search for "pessoas envolvidas devem pertencer" to ensure it's gone.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "devem pertencer às suas equipes"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
10527|                return 'Os responsáveis pela ação devem pertencer às suas equipes.';

code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/SsmaController.php"], "search_text": "all_members_for_event_people"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
13671|                'all_members_for_event_people' => $allMembersForEventPeople,

Request #67 deepseek-v4-flash P:96.46K C:199 CR:96.26K CW:0 2536ms
Reasoning
The message "As pessoas envolvidas devem pertencer às suas equipes." is now gone (only "Os responsáveis pela ação..." remains, for action plan validation at 10527). Now let me check the listing builder to confirm that when team/area scope is applied, the template var `ssma_apply_team_event_scope` is set to true, and so `_membersForModal` = all_members_for_event_people = full list (not filtered). Let me find where `ssma_apply_team_event_scope` is set in viewData.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/SsmaController.php"], "search_text": "ssma_apply_team_event_scope"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 1
13674|                'ssma_apply_team_event_scope' => $applyTeamEventScope,

Request #68 deepseek-v4-flash P:96.71K C:131 CR:96.64K CW:0 2240ms
Reasoning
Let me look at the actual current final code lines 13640-13700 to understand data keys, and also to confirm `all_members_for_event_people` unchanged when team/area scope is applied.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 13700, "file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 13630}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 13630-13700
13630|                'ssmaAllowedCreateTypes' => $ssmaAllowedCreateTypes,
13631|                'ssmaOccurrenceTypeColumns' => SsmaOccurrenceCreatePermissionService::TYPE_COLUMNS,
13632|                'ssmaPreventionInspectionEnabled' => $ssmaPreventionInspectionEnabled,
13633|                'ssmaPreventionAbordagemEnabled'  => $ssmaPreventionAbordagemEnabled,
13634|                'ssmaCanCreatePreventionItems' => $ssmaCanCreatePreventionItems,
13635|                'ssmaCanAccessSupervisorSurface' => $ssmaCanAccessSupervisorSurface,
13636|                'ssmaCanAccessPreventionPanelAndMetas' => $ssmaCanAccessPreventionPanelAndMetas,
13637|                'ssmaCanAccessOccurrencePanel' => $ssmaCanAccessOccurrencePanel,
13638|                'ssmaCanPublishCulturalFeed' => $company instanceof Company
13639|                    && $user instanceof User
13640|                    && $this->ssmaFeedImprovementBridge->canManageFeedImprovements($user, $company),
13641|                'ssmaCanAccessOccurrenceAutomations' => $ssmaCanAccessOccurrenceAutomations,
13642|                'ssmaCanManageConfig' => $ssmaCanManageConfig,
13643|                'ssmaCanManagePermissions' => $ssmaCanManagePermissions,
13644|                'ssmaCanCreateLinkedActions' => $ssmaCanCreateLinkedActions,
13645|                'ssmaCanMutateActionPlan' => $ssmaCanMutateActionPlan,
13646|                'ssmaPreventionCanCreateLinkedActions' => $ssmaPreventionCanCreateLinkedActions,
13647|                'ssmaCanEditPreventionContent' => $ssmaCanEditPreventionContent,
13648|                'ssmaCanEditPreventionMetasTable' => $ssmaCanEditPreventionMetasTable,
13649|                'ssmaCanCreateCauseTree' => $ssmaCanCreateCauseTree,
13650|                'ssmaCanViewCauseTree'   => $ssmaCanViewCauseTree,
13651|                'causeTreeCommitteeHelpLines' => $company instanceof Company
13652|                    ? $this->ssmaCauseTreeService->getCommitteeHelpLines((int) $company->getId())
13653|                    : [],
13654|                'ssmaCanCreateAuthorization' => $ssmaCanCreateAuthorization,
13655|                'ssmaCanEditHorasTrabalhadas' => $ssmaCanEditHorasTrabalhadas,
13656|                'ssmaCanViewAccidentVictimName' => $this->isGranted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN')
13657|                    || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER')
13658|                    || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR')
13659|                    || $ssmaProductTagName === 'Gestor Administrador'
13660|                    || $ssmaIsTagTeamSupervisor
13661|                    || $ssmaIsTagTeamGestor
13662|                    || $ssmaIsTagAreaSupervisor
13663|                    || $ssmaIsTagAreaGestor
13664|                    || $this->isSsmaViewer(),
13665|                'gestores'      => $gestores,
13666|                'teams'       => $teams,
13667|                'gestores_for_event_modal' => $gestoresForEventModal,
13668|                'teams_for_event_modal' => $teamsForEventModal,
13669|                'teams_for_inspection_modal' => $teamsForInspectionModal,
13670|                'default_inspection_team_id' => $defaultInspectionTeamId,
13671|                'all_members_for_event_people' => $allMembersForEventPeople,
13672|                'ssma_modal_members' => $allMembersForEventPeople,
13673|                /** true = usar listas filtradas nos modais; false = admin/tenant vê lista completa */
13674|                'ssma_apply_team_event_scope' => $applyTeamEventScope,
13675|                'ssma_event_form_defaults' => $ssmaEventFormDefaults,
13676|                'ssma_logged_member_id' => (int) ($loggedMemberForOccurrence?->getId() ?? 0),
13677|                'ssma_is_admin_aprofundamento' => $this->isSsmaAprofundamentoAdmin($company, $user instanceof User ? $user : null),
13678|                // Resolve pela tag SSMA real (mesmo com ROLE_MANAGER de plataforma).
13679|                'ssma_is_pessoa_fisica_comum' => $this->isSsmaPlainProductMember($company, $user instanceof User ? $user : null),
13680|                'ssma_can_change_event_manager' => $ssmaCanChangeEventManager,
13681|                'ssma_is_gestor_user' => $ssmaIsTagTeamGestor
13682|                    || $ssmaIsTagAreaGestor
13683|                    || $ssmaProductTagName === 'Gestor Administrador'
13684|                    || $this->isSsmaAprofundamentoAdmin($company, $user instanceof User ? $user : null)
13685|                    || $this->isGranted('ROLE_MANAGER_GESTOR'),
13686|                'ssma_perm_tags' => $ssmaPermTags,
13687|                'ros_call_priority' => $rosCallPriority,
13688|                'allMembers'  => $allMembers,
13689|                'abordagem_turno_options' => ($isOccurrenceDetailView || $module === 'occurrence')
13690|                    ? []
13691|                    : $this->buildSsmaAbordagemTurnoOptions($company),
13692|                'default_abordagem_observador_id' => $defaultAbordagemObservadorId,
13693|                'default_insp_responsible_id'    => $defaultAbordagemObservadorId,
13694|                'inspection_types' => $company instanceof Company
13695|                    ? $this->ssmaInspectionTypeConfig->getTypesForFrontend($company)
13696|                    : [],
13697|                /** Contexto de tenant para cache de listas no front (ex.: questionários PE) */
13698|                'ssma_company_id'                 => $company?->getId(),
13699|                'ssma_export_matricula'           => $ssmaExportMatricula,
13700|                'ssmaCanDescharacterizeAccident' => $ssmaCanDescharacterizeAccident,
Request #69 deepseek-v4-flash P:98.39K C:1.57K CR:96.77K CW:0 14559ms
Reasoning
OK. So `all_members_for_event_people` = `$allMembers` (full). Given `ssma_apply_team_event_scope` true and template picks `_membersForModal = all_members_for_event_people`, supervisors now see full company member list in the modal. But previously also `allMembers` full company list is passed to template as `allMembers`. In the template, what is `_membersForModal` used for? It is the `allMembers` param of `_modal_event.html.twig`, which presumably is used to populate member option lists in the modal (the ev injured persons etc.). So previously with team scope they got scoped list. Now full list. But do the list of "people involved" options actually come from the allMembers list passed to the modal? Likely. And for event team-scoped flows with select2 remote search, the search endpoint `searchSsmaMembers` restricts by team scope for non-manager, BUT the manager select isn't about "people involved". Actually there is a "pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" picker that might use local allMembers (from modal) or remote with `gestor_modal`? Let me not go too deep. Given time constraints, I'll decide to report: NEW Finding 1 (medium): Removal of the involved-people server-side scope validation and of the modal member filtering means supervisors/team-scoped users can now reference people from the entire company when creating events, while scope remains in the UI only for managers. Ask to confirm intent, or restore one guard layer. It's a scoping/authorization regression candidate. But wait, I should double check whether the removed people restriction check was perhaps already superseded earlier (maybe in the same file there's a separate peopleIds validation by the `normalizeSsmaEventPayload`). Let me search for `people_ids` validation near createEvent. Actually, note the create flow: `validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope` is the only scope validator for the event create. There may be additional validation inside SsmaEventValidator or SsmaEventService that checks each person is an active member of the company? That's data integrity, not team scope. Given the earlier remove of people check is within validate, yes. However, is it likely intended? Since the changes focus on making manager a leader (of the person) and the "people involved" are those a manager is leader of (i.e., if manager is leader within team, the involved people must belong to that manager's team — which corresponds to the same team). Actually under the new model, the leader (immediate superior) may belong to the reporter's team scope only if reporter in the team. If the involved people are from the supervisor's teams, the manager (their own leader) belongs to that team. So the previous people-in-team-scope restriction might still be relevant to keep data consistent. I'll keep this finding as a question mark but phrased concrete. Hmm. But could be an intended relaxation. Since a code review should point out potential issue with the deletion, I'd mention low-to-medium and ask for confirmation. Let me be careful: rule says favor precision over recall. Without knowing intent, flagging a removed check might be noise if the business wanted it. However, the deletion *only* of the people check (not in commit message) seems likely accidental in replacing manager logic. Hmm, I worry this is intended behavior per Brenda's rule that manager must be leader; the involved person under ROS should be the person who reported? For ROS "Relatado por" the involved person could be the reporter? Actually with new manager rule: ROS registrar - member reports their own ROS; person involved may be others. Hmm. Given the codebase's scope restriction pattern, supervisors seeing only their teams is heavily guarded everywhere else. The modal members previously scoped to team, but now not. But `loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite($company)` is full list; supervisors probably see full names list in other member pickers? Given uncertainty, I'll report with medium severity and ask for confirmation, and NOT treat as a definite bug. Actually let me re-read removed code to confirm what exactly got removed, precisely to make a claim: Old (before change) in validate function: ``` $gestorEligible = ... if (!isset($gestorEligible[$managerId]) && !isset($allowedMembers[$managerId])) { return 'O gestor responsável deve pertencer a uma das suas equipes ou ser um gestor cadastrado no SSMA.'; } $peopleRaw = $details['people_ids'] ?? ''; $peopleIds = []; if (is_array($peopleRaw)) { $peopleIds = array_values(array_filter(array_map('intval', $peopleRaw))); } elseif (is_string($peopleRaw) && $peopleRaw !== '') { $peopleIds = array_values(array_filter(array_map('intval', array_map('trim', explode(',', $peopleRaw))))); } $personId = ...; if ($personId > 0) { $peopleIds[] = $personId; } ... foreach ($peopleIds as $pid) { if (!isset($allowedMembers[$pid])) { return 'As pessoas envolvidas devem pertencer às suas equipes.'; } } ``` New validation only handles manager_id (as leader). So the change removed the check that person/people_ids belong to the user's team scope. This is a scope relaxation. In the diff, it was likely intentional? The PR changes the manager semantics; the "pessoas envolvidas" may refer to injured people of the accident. For an accident in a team, the injured is from the same team. For ROS, the person may be anyone. But supervisor might create an event for an injured member of another team? Not allowed under the team event flow maybe. I'll report this as a potential scope regression. Now finding candidate 2: the old people-in-scope validation removed but the new "manager leader within scope" relies on manager_id; The manager default from own leader may be null when user no superior; findings already cover. Let me also check for the new modal default selecting manager for ROS: Because the select disabled for members — but is the select still sent with evSyncReportedByFieldForType etc. But there's possibly a bug in new JS: default manager_id applied only when `type` changes (evSyncReportedByFieldForType for type). Actually function only invoked on type change. On creation open, before selecting type, is the default preselected? If the modal opens without a type, wrap d-none? In code they removed old branch hiding wrap for ROS-only. Now wrap is always visible & selects own leader default only in sync function, which is called... when? Let me see the region around 5240-5270 to read full function and where it's called from. Also check EV_LOGGED_MEMBER_ID etc. Let me read the whole function with callers: search `evSyncReportedByFieldForType(` calls in the same file.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "evSyncReportedByFieldForType", "file_patterns": ["templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig"]}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig
Match lines: 3
5227|        evSyncReportedByFieldForType(type);
5241|    function evSyncReportedByFieldForType(type) {
5345|        evSyncReportedByFieldForType(type);

Request #70 deepseek-v4-flash P:100.05K C:97 CR:99.84K CW:0 1807ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig", "start_line": 5200, "end_line": 5370}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig (Total lines: 7818)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 5200-5370
5200|        if (type === 'QUASE_ACIDENTE') {
5201|            toggleQaPersonRow();
5202|            if (typeof filterQaPotentialConsequence === 'function') {
5203|                filterQaPotentialConsequence();
5204|            }
5205|        }
5206|
5207|        // ROS: re-apply potential consequence filter
5208|        if (type === 'ROS') {
5209|            filterRosPotentialConsequence();
5210|        }
5211|
5212|        // Ao mudar tipo, sincroniza visibilidade do bloco de regiões
5213|        if (type === 'ACIDENTE_PESSOAL') {
5214|            syncBodyRegionVisibility();
5215|            if (evHadInjuryForValidation()) {
5216|                evEnsureBodyMapForCard(evGetActiveInjuredCardForBodyMap());
5217|            }
5218|            evSyncInjuredCardsFromInvolved();
5219|        } else {
5220|            var bmb = document.getElementById('ev-body-map-block');
5221|            if (bmb) bmb.classList.add('d-none');
5222|        }
5223|
5224|        if (typeof window.renderEvCategorySelect === 'function') {
5225|            window.renderEvCategorySelect(type, '');
5226|        }
5227|        evSyncReportedByFieldForType(type);
5228|        evSyncCriticalityField(type);
5229|        evSetAprofundamentoReadonly(!evRequiresAprofundamento(type) || !evCanEditAprofundamento(type));
5230|        evSyncAccidentCostFields(type || '');
5231|        evUpdateFooter();
5232|    }
5233|
5234|    /**
5235|     * Gestor responsável (ROS e Evento):
5236|     * - Sempre visível nas informações gerais do off-canvas.
5237|     * - Default = líder imediato de quem está cadastrando (SSMA_EVENT_FORM_DEFAULTS.manager_id).
5238|     * - Membro/supervisor: campo travado.
5239|     * - Gestor: pode trocar entre líderes imediatos do seu escopo.
5240|     */
5241|    function evSyncReportedByFieldForType(type) {
5242|        var wrap    = document.getElementById('ev-manager-field-wrap');
5243|        var labelEl = document.getElementById('ev-manager-label-text');
5244|        var sel     = document.getElementById('ev_manager');
5245|        if (!wrap || !sel) return;
5246|
5247|        if (sel.dataset.origRequired === undefined) {
5248|            sel.dataset.origRequired = sel.required ? '1' : '0';
5249|        }
5250|
5251|        if (labelEl) labelEl.textContent = 'Gestor responsável';
5252|        wrap.classList.remove('d-none');
5253|        sel.required = sel.dataset.origRequired === '1';
5254|
5255|        var canChange = !!window.SSMA_CAN_CHANGE_EVENT_MANAGER;
5256|        sel.disabled = !canChange;
5257|
5258|        var defs = window.SSMA_EVENT_FORM_DEFAULTS || {};
5259|        var defaultManagerId = defs.manager_id ? String(defs.manager_id) : '';
5260|        if (!sel.value && defaultManagerId) {
5261|            for (var i = 0; i < sel.options.length; i++) {
5262|                if (String(sel.options[i].value) === defaultManagerId) {
5263|                    sel.value = defaultManagerId;
5264|                    if (window.jQuery) { window.jQuery(sel).trigger('change'); }
5265|                    break;
5266|                }
5267|            }
5268|        }
5269|    }
5270|
5271|    /** De-para 1:1 — 5 consequências pessoais ↔ 5 níveis de gravidade. */
5272|    var EV_CONSEQUENCE_TO_CRITICALITY = {
5273|        SEM_DANO: 'LEVE',
5274|        LESAO_LEVE: 'BAIXO',
5275|        LESAO_MODERADA: 'MEDIO',
5276|        LESAO_GRAVE: 'ALTO',
5277|        FATALIDADE: 'SEVERO',
5278|        DANO_MATERIAL_LEVE: 'LEVE',
5279|        DANO_MATERIAL_MODERADO: 'BAIXO',
5280|        DANO_MATERIAL_GRAVE: 'ALTO',
5281|        PARADA_OPERACIONAL: 'SEVERO',
5282|        CONTAMINACAO_AGUA: 'ALTO',
5283|        CONTAMINACAO_SOLO: 'ALTO',
5284|        POLUICAO_AR: 'ALTO',
5285|        AA1: 'LEVE',
5286|        AA2: 'MEDIO',
5287|        AA3: 'SEVERO',
5288|        // Pessoal / Material: consequência = escala de gravidade
5289|        LEVE: 'LEVE',
5290|        BAIXO: 'BAIXO',
5291|        MEDIO: 'MEDIO',
5292|        ALTO: 'ALTO',
5293|        SEVERO: 'SEVERO'
5294|    };
5295|    function evResolvePotentialSeverity() {
5296|        for (var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++) {
5297|            var v = String(arguments[i] || '').toUpperCase();
5298|            if (!v) continue;
5299|            if (EV_CONSEQUENCE_TO_CRITICALITY[v]) return EV_CONSEQUENCE_TO_CRITICALITY[v];
5300|            if (EV_CRITICALITY_LABELS[v]) return v;
5301|        }
5302|        return '';
5303|    }
5304|    var EV_CRITICALITY_LABELS = {
5305|        LEVE: 'Leve', BAIXO: 'Baixo', MEDIO: 'Médio', ALTO: 'Alto', SEVERO: 'Severo',
5306|        MODERADO: 'Moderado', CRITICO: 'Crítico'
5307|    };
5308|    var EV_CRITICALITY_COLORS = {
5309|        LEVE:   { bg: 'rgba(37,173,82,0.12)', color: '#25AD52', border: '#25AD52' },
5310|        BAIXO:  { bg: 'rgba(37,173,82,0.12)', color: '#25AD52', border: '#25AD52' },
5311|        MEDIO:  { bg: 'rgba(255,193,7,0.15)', color: '#B78103', border: '#FFC107' },
5312|        MODERADO: { bg: 'rgba(255,193,7,0.15)', color: '#B78103', border: '#FFC107' },
5313|        ALTO:   { bg: 'rgba(253,126,20,0.14)', color: '#FD7E14', border: '#FD7E14' },
5314|        SEVERO: { bg: 'rgba(234,21,28,0.12)', color: '#EA151C', border: '#EA151C' },
5315|        CRITICO:{ bg: 'rgba(234,21,28,0.12)', color: '#EA151C', border: '#EA151C' }
5316|    };
5317|
5318|    /** Gravidade: acidentes, ROS e Quase Acidente derivam da consequência. */
5319|    function evSyncCriticalityField(type) {
5320|        var wrap = document.getElementById('ev-gravity-wrap');
5321|        var sel  = document.getElementById('ev_criticality');
5322|        var derivedWrap = document.getElementById('ev-derived-severity-wrap');
5323|        var rosDerivedWrap = document.getElementById('ev-ros-derived-severity-wrap');
5324|        var qaDerivedWrap = document.getElementById('ev-qa-derived-severity-wrap');
5325|        if (!sel) return;
5326|        var isAccident = evRequiresAccidentTechnical(type);
5327|        var isRos = type === 'ROS';
5328|        var isQa = type === 'QUASE_ACIDENTE';
5329|        if (wrap) {
5330|            wrap.classList.add('d-none');
5331|        }
5332|        sel.required = false;
5333|        if (derivedWrap) derivedWrap.classList.toggle('d-none', !isAccident);
5334|        if (rosDerivedWrap) rosDerivedWrap.classList.toggle('d-none', !isRos);
5335|        if (qaDerivedWrap) qaDerivedWrap.classList.toggle('d-none', !isQa);
5336|        if (isAccident) {
5337|            evSyncDerivedSeverityFromConsequence();
5338|        } else if (isRos) {
5339|            evSyncRosDerivedSeverityFromPotential();
5340|        } else if (isQa) {
5341|            evSyncQaDerivedSeverityFromPotential();
5342|        }
5343|        evSyncAaIdentFields(type);
5344|        evSyncPeopleFieldForType(type);
5345|        evSyncReportedByFieldForType(type);
5346|        evSyncDescaracterStageUi();
5347|    }
5348|
5349|    function evSyncPeopleFieldForType(type) {
5350|        var wrap = document.getElementById('ev-people-field-wrap');
5351|        if (!wrap) return;
5352|        var hide = type === 'ROS';
5353|        wrap.classList.toggle('d-none', hide);
5354|        if (hide) {
5355|            var peopleIds = document.getElementById('ev_people_ids');
5356|            if (peopleIds) peopleIds.value = '';
5357|            var tags = document.getElementById('ev_people_tags');
5358|            if (tags) tags.innerHTML = '';
5359|        }
5360|    }
5361|    function evApplyDerivedSeverityBadge(badgeId, consequence) {
5362|        var key = EV_CONSEQUENCE_TO_CRITICALITY[consequence] || '';
5363|        var badge = document.getElementById(badgeId);
5364|        var critSel = document.getElementById('ev_criticality');
5365|        if (critSel && key) critSel.value = key;
5366|        if (!badge) return key;
5367|        if (!key) {
5368|            badge.textContent = '—';
5369|            badge.style.background = 'rgba(108,117,125,0.10)';
5370|            badge.style.color = '#6c757d';
Request #71 deepseek-v4-flash P:102.7K C:647 CR:100.1K CW:0 6752ms
Reasoning
Wait — for ROS, `evSyncPeopleFieldForType` hides the people field (`hide = type === 'ROS'`). And the "manager" select was historically used to pick the affected person? No. Interesting note: `evSyncReportedByFieldForType` is invoked at type change and after `evSyncCriticalityField`. Now manager default will be set on type change; if the user later changes the manager (can change) then switches type, `sel.value` non-empty so not overwritten. Fine. But here's a possible bug: `evSyncReportedByFieldForType` sets `sel.required = sel.dataset.origRequired === '1'` where origRequired is determined when? `sel.dataset.origRequired === undefined` sets from the required attr at the time of first call. The initial `required` attribute is set server-side based on gestoresList length >0. If the field is disabled due to canChange false, but required true and no value because manager default not in options (possible when user has no superior and no managers in list), then a required & disabled select... Actually required + disabled select and empty value → browser will block submit? Disabled controls are excluded from constraint validation. So form submits with empty value → server might reject or accept. For members with team scope, rejection message. For plain member without scope, no rejection. Edge case. Now, let me consider whether the modal for ROS originally had the manager select also used for something in flash report 'Relatado por' (reporter). If a plain member's own leader has no team (e.g., leader is a platform admin), etc. Out of scope. Let me look at areas where the new code could break the approval-side effect? That isn't in diff. Given the many possible issues and confirmed findings count is 5, maybe 2-3 more good ones to add: NEW Candidate A (real regression from deleted server check on people membership to teams). Let me evaluate more concretely: Under the new rule, the modal `_membersForModal` uses all members. The frontend code has multiple other pickers using shared.initSearchableMemberField remote with remoteExtraParams. Are any member fields scoped on client by allMembers list? The manager field remote search adds `responsible_manager:1` which server-scopes leaders by team/area. The people picker search? If people picker uses remote with team param... The event modal's person picker for involved persons presumably uses `shared.initSearchableMemberField` with team_id param? Let me look at how injured/person pickers in the modal filter server-side. Search initSearchableMemberField usage in _modal_event.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "initSearchableMemberField", "file_patterns": ["templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig"]}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig
Match lines: 2
4312|        if (typeof shared.initSearchableMemberField === 'function' && window.SSMA_CAN_CHANGE_EVENT_MANAGER) {
4313|            shared.initSearchableMemberField($('#ev_manager'), {

Request #72 deepseek-v4-flash P:103.43K C:235 CR:103.3K CW:0 3425ms
Reasoning
Only manager uses remote. Other member pickers probably use local options from allMembers. Let's look at how the "pessoa(s) envolvida(s)" field (ev_people / ev_injured) options are built. Likely from allMembers passed to the modal. But do involved pickers restrict to members in `allMembers`? They search within the local `_membersForModal`. Previously that was team-scoped; now it's company-wide. If `_membersForModal` is only used for building small "related members" list, but the actual selector might be remote from search endpoint with team param. Let me check how `ev_people` select is set up (search for ev_people_ids or injured select).
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "ev_manager", "file_patterns": ["templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig"]}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig
Match lines: 18
240|            <label for="ev_manager" id="ev-manager-label"><span id="ev-manager-label-text">Gestor responsável</span> {% if gestoresList|length > 0 %}<span class="text-danger">*</span>{% endif %}</label>
241|            <select class="form-control" id="ev_manager" name="ev_manager" {% if gestoresList|length > 0 %}required{% endif %}{% if not ssmaCanChangeEventManager|default(false) %} disabled{% endif %}>
259|            <div id="ev_manager_preview" class="d-none mt-2"></div>
3131|            var reportedBy = String((document.getElementById('ev_manager') || { value: '' }).value || '').trim();
4313|            shared.initSearchableMemberField($('#ev_manager'), {
5029|            $('#ev_manager_preview').addClass('d-none').empty();
5244|        var sel     = document.getElementById('ev_manager');
5918|        var $preview = $('#ev_manager_preview');
5920|        var managerId = String(($('#ev_manager').val() || '')).trim();
5933|            ? shared.memberMetaFromSelection(managerId, $('#ev_manager option:selected'), window.SSMA_EV_MEMBERS_BY_ID || {})
5947|    $(document).on('change', '#ev_manager', function () {
5955|        $('#ev_manager').val('').trigger('change');
5994|            '#ev_manager',
6280|        if (det.manager_id)               evSetVal('ev_manager', det.manager_id);
6609|        $('#ev_manager').trigger('change');
6731|                    evSetVal('ev_manager', String(defs.manager_id));
6739|                    $('#ev_manager').trigger('change');
7010|            manager_id:       document.getElementById('ev_manager').value,

Request #73 deepseek-v4-flash P:104.12K C:217 CR:103.55K CW:0 3189ms
Reasoning
Let me read around 4300-4340 (init manager select) and around 6700-6760 (defaults applied). Also 5994 area (select config).
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig", "start_line": 4290, "end_line": 4360}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig (Total lines: 7818)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 4290-4360
4290|        });
4291|
4292|        $(document).on('click', '#ev-body-map-host .ssma-bm-tab', function () {
4293|            window.setTimeout(function () {
4294|                if (typeof window.__ssmaSyncEvExtremityFloats === 'function') {
4295|                    window.__ssmaSyncEvExtremityFloats();
4296|                }
4297|            }, 80);
4298|        });
4299|
4300|        if (!window.__ssmaEvExtremityResizeBound) {
4301|            window.__ssmaEvExtremityResizeBound = true;
4302|            window.addEventListener('resize', function () {
4303|                if (typeof window.__ssmaSyncEvExtremityFloats === 'function') {
4304|                    window.__ssmaSyncEvExtremityFloats();
4305|                }
4306|            });
4307|        }
4308|
4309|        syncEvTagHiddens();
4310|        syncEvExtremitySelects();
4311|
4312|        if (typeof shared.initSearchableMemberField === 'function' && window.SSMA_CAN_CHANGE_EVENT_MANAGER) {
4313|            shared.initSearchableMemberField($('#ev_manager'), {
4314|                mode: 'single',
4315|                placeholder: 'Buscar gestor...',
4316|                dropdownParent: '#modalEventNew-offcanvas-wrapper',
4317|                remoteExtraParams: { gestor_modal: 1, responsible_manager: 1 }
4318|            });
4319|        }
4320|
4321|        if (typeof shared.closeAllSearchableMemberDropdowns === 'function') {
4322|            shared.closeAllSearchableMemberDropdowns('#modalEventNew-offcanvas-wrapper');
4323|        }
4324|
4325|        initEvTagSelectsOnce._done = true;
4326|
4327|        // Expõe configs de tags para uso externo (ex.: populateForEdit)
4328|        window.EvModal = window.EvModal || {};
4329|        window.EvModal._tagConfigs = EV_TAG_CONFIGS;
4330|        window.EvModal.syncTagHiddens = syncEvTagHiddens;
4331|    }
4332|
4333|    /* ── Evidências: upload AJAX + preview ──────────────── */
4334|    var EV_EVIDENCE_UPLOAD_URL = '{{ path('admin_ssma_occurrence_evidence_upload') }}';
4335|    var EV_EVIDENCE_APPEND_URL = '{{ path('admin_ssma_occurrence_evidence_append') }}';
4336|    var EV_CREATE_URL          = '{{ path('ssma_event_create') }}';
4337|    var EV_UPDATE_URL_TPL      = '{{ path('ssma_event_update', {id: '__EV_ID__'})|e('js') }}';
4338|    var EV_EVIDENCE_MAX_BYTES  = 10 * 1024 * 1024;
4339|    var evEvidences = []; // [{name, path, persisted?}]
4340|    var evRosResolutionEvidences = []; // [{name, path, persisted?}] — evidência opcional do "Visto e resolvido"
4341|
4342|    function evCurrentEventId() {
4343|        var el = document.getElementById('ev_id');
4344|        var id = el ? parseInt(el.value, 10) : 0;
4345|        return (id > 0 && !isNaN(id)) ? id : 0;
4346|    }
4347|
4348|    function evShowFlashApprovalToast(flashApproval) {
4349|        if (!flashApproval || typeof showToast !== 'function') {
4350|            return;
4351|        }
4352|        if (!flashApproval.success) {
4353|            return;
4354|        }
4355|        if (flashApproval.cc_demand_id) {
4356|            showToast(
4357|                'Flash report enviado para aprovação (demanda #' + flashApproval.cc_demand_id + ').',
4358|                'Flash report',
4359|                'fas fa-bell',
4360|                'bg-info'
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig", "start_line": 6690, "end_line": 6760}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig (Total lines: 7818)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 6690-6760
6690|            if (window.__ssmaEvCreateMode === 'ros') {
6691|                modalTitle.textContent = 'Novo ROS';
6692|            } else if (window.__ssmaEvCreateMode === 'event') {
6693|                modalTitle.textContent = 'Novo evento';
6694|            } else {
6695|                modalTitle.textContent = 'Nova ocorrência';
6696|            }
6697|        }
6698|        var generalPanelCreate = document.getElementById('ev-step-general');
6699|        if (generalPanelCreate) generalPanelCreate.classList.remove('is-readonly');
6700|
6701|        if (typeof initEvTagSelectsOnce === 'function') {
6702|            initEvTagSelectsOnce();
6703|        }
6704|        evResetCreateUiState();
6705|        if (typeof evInitTypeSelectFromConfig === 'function') {
6706|            evInitTypeSelectFromConfig();
6707|        }
6708|        evApplyDatetimeMax();
6709|        evApplyAuraTitleStatusVisibility('create');
6710|        if (typeof window.renderEvCategorySelect === 'function') {
6711|            window.renderEvCategorySelect('', '');
6712|        }
6713|
6714|        var typeEl = document.getElementById('ev_type');
6715|        applyTypeBlock((typeEl && typeEl.value) ? typeEl.value : '');
6716|        ensureClassificationDefaults('', true);
6717|        evDefaultDatetimeToday();
6718|
6719|        if (window.SSMA_IS_AURA_ADMIN) {
6720|            evSetVal('ev_title', '');
6721|            evSetVal('ev_status', 'ABERTO');
6722|        }
6723|
6724|        (function applyEvCreateDefaults() {
6725|            var defs = window.SSMA_EVENT_FORM_DEFAULTS || {};
6726|            if (!defs || typeof defs !== 'object') {
6727|                defs = {};
6728|            }
6729|            function apply() {
6730|                if (defs.manager_id) {
6731|                    evSetVal('ev_manager', String(defs.manager_id));
6732|                }
6733|                if (defs.team_id) {
6734|                    evSetVal('ev_team_id', String(defs.team_id));
6735|                }
6736|                ensureClassificationDefaults('', true);
6737|                var $ = window.jQuery;
6738|                if ($) {
6739|                    $('#ev_manager').trigger('change');
6740|                    $('#ev_team_id').trigger('change');
6741|                }
6742|                if (typeof window.EvModal.syncTagHiddens === 'function') {
6743|                    // Evita regravar draft vazio logo após limpar a criação.
6744|                    var _persist = typeof evPersistDraftSoon === 'function' ? evPersistDraftSoon : null;
6745|                    if (_persist) {
6746|                        window.__ssmaEvSkipDraftPersist = true;
6747|                    }
6748|                    window.EvModal.syncTagHiddens();
6749|                    window.__ssmaEvSkipDraftPersist = false;
6750|                }
6751|                evFilterInjuredPersonSelect();
6752|                evSyncDescaracterUi();
6753|                evSyncContainmentTimeEnabled();
6754|                evSyncInjuryClassificationByLeave();
6755|                evSyncDerivedSeverityFromConsequence();
6756|            }
6757|            if (typeof window.requestAnimationFrame === 'function') {
6758|                window.requestAnimationFrame(function () { apply(); });
6759|            } else {
6760|                window.setTimeout(apply, 0);
Request #74 deepseek-v4-flash P:106.27K C:389 CR:104.32K CW:0 4485ms
Reasoning
OK, on create they apply defs.manager_id (own leader) - it sets value even if option exists? evSetVal probably selects if option exists; if not, empty value set. Then triggers change. Now there's a subtle new bug in create defaults: `SSMA_EVENT_FORM_DEFAULTS` for a manager (can change) default own leader may not be present in their own scope options? For a Gestor de Equipe whose own leader is a "Supervisor" above them (outside their team), the options list includes own leader anyway (by design). So OK. Now, note about `evResetCreateUiState` sets sel.value to ''. Then `evSyncReportedByFieldForType` will later set default if defs.manager_id found among options. I think the JS is mostly consistent. There's an issue though: For a plain member (canChange false) the select is disabled. When a disabled select participates in JS `$('#ev_manager').val()` reading at line 7010, it returns the value. Yes. Now, let's revisit the earlier concern about `ssma_is_gestor_user` change: The modal script `window.SSMA_IS_GESTOR_USER` is now also true for area gestores and via ssma_is_gestor_user includes additional cases. But we should check if SSMA_IS_GESTOR_USER is used elsewhere in JS in ways affected by adding area gestor. Let me check usage of SSMA_IS_GESTOR_USER in the modal and related JS. It is set in the same script too. Search across twig.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "SSMA_IS_GESTOR_USER"}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 2
3496|                (bool) ($viewData['ssma_is_gestor_user'] ?? false)
13681|                'ssma_is_gestor_user' => $ssmaIsTagTeamGestor

File: templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig
Match lines: 1
619|        or ssma_is_gestor_user|default(false)

File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig
Match lines: 2
48|        {% set ssmaIsGestorUser = ssma_is_gestor_user|default(false) %}
54|        window.SSMA_IS_GESTOR_USER = {{ ssmaIsGestorUser ? 'true' : 'false' }};

File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/assert_branch_ui_fixes.php
Match lines: 1
295|    && fileContains($occView, 'ssma_is_gestor_user|default(false)')

File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/assert_flash_report_flow.php
Match lines: 1
56|    && fileContains($occView, 'ssma_is_gestor_user|default(false)')

Request #75 deepseek-v4-flash P:106.95K C:549 CR:106.62K CW:0 5202ms
Reasoning
SSMA_IS_GESTOR_USER defined in the modal, but within the modal code there's likely many references using `window.SSMA_IS_GESTOR_USER`. Actually a search on just the modal script for `SSMA_IS_GESTOR_USER` returned only lines 48/54; so other usages? Wait there might be in external JS `public/js/ssma/...`. Let me search for `SSMA_IS_GESTOR_USER` globally in js. We did global search but only src/Controller and templates matched. Wait that's strange; maybe modal uses `SSMA_IS_GESTOR_USER` in hidden scripts from other includes? The occurrence_view line 619 uses ssma_is_gestor_user twig var. No other JS consumer? Perhaps the previous code used `SSMA_IS_GESTOR_USER` only in this modal (the code removed). Hmm. Then the "flash perms" path at controller line 3496 passes ssma_is_gestor_user to resolveSsmaFlashReportUiPermissions for detail view. `ssma_is_gestor_user` in detail data = viewData['ssma_is_gestor_user'] computed in build (now includes area gestor). That may change flash report permissions for area gestores. But is that desired? Probably fine. OK, now let's more deeply confirm the candidate about people scope. Let me look at the current state of index to see `all_members_for_event_people` and event modal member usage to craft the finding precisely. But the actual UI fields that use allMembers inside modal: injured persons, involved persons, witnesses maybe. Let's check quick: `ev_injured` / ev people etc are probably populated via `ev_people_tags` data attributes from `allMembers` rows. But the top-level variables passed to `_modal_event` include `allMembers`; e.g., the select with id `ev_people_ids`? Let me search template for options built from allMembers. There's `ssma_ev_members_by_id` maybe. Let's search `window.SSMA_EV_MEMBERS_BY_ID` or `allMembers` inside modal.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "SSMA_EV_MEMBERS_BY_ID", "file_patterns": ["templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig"]}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig
Match lines: 4
1517|    window.SSMA_EV_MEMBERS_BY_ID = (function (list) {
2093|        var map = window.SSMA_EV_MEMBERS_BY_ID || {};
3160|        var meta = (window.SSMA_EV_MEMBERS_BY_ID || {})[String(reporterId)];
5933|            ? shared.memberMetaFromSelection(managerId, $('#ev_manager option:selected'), window.SSMA_EV_MEMBERS_BY_ID || {})

Request #76 deepseek-v4-flash P:107.65K C:97 CR:107.39K CW:0 1760ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig", "start_line": 1505, "end_line": 1565}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig (Total lines: 7818)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1505-1565
1505|            position: g.position|default(''),
1506|            avatar: g.avatar|default(''),
1507|            area: g.area|default(''),
1508|            team_name: g.team_name|default(''),
1509|            registration: _gRegMap,
1510|            superior_id: g.superior_id|default(null),
1511|            supervisor_name: g.supervisor_name|default(''),
1512|            gerencia: g.gerencia|default(g.area|default('')),
1513|            work_shift_id: g.work_shift_id|default(null),
1514|            work_shift_label: g.work_shift_label|default('')
1515|        }]) %}
1516|    {% endfor %}
1517|    window.SSMA_EV_MEMBERS_BY_ID = (function (list) {
1518|        var map = {};
1519|        (list || []).forEach(function (m) {
1520|            if (!m || m.id == null || m.id === '') return;
1521|            var key = String(m.id);
1522|            // Mantém o primeiro registro completo; gestores não sobrescrevem membros.
1523|            if (!map[key]) {
1524|                map[key] = m;
1525|            } else {
1526|                var cur = map[key];
1527|                if (!cur.position && m.position) cur.position = m.position;
1528|                if (!cur.supervisor_name && m.supervisor_name) cur.supervisor_name = m.supervisor_name;
1529|                if (!cur.gerencia && (m.gerencia || m.area)) cur.gerencia = m.gerencia || m.area;
1530|                if (!cur.area && m.area) cur.area = m.area;
1531|                if (!cur.work_shift_label && m.work_shift_label) cur.work_shift_label = m.work_shift_label;
1532|                if (!cur.team_name && m.team_name) cur.team_name = m.team_name;
1533|            }
1534|        });
1535|        return map;
1536|    })({{ _evMembersList|json_encode|raw }});
1537|    window.SSMA_ESOCIAL_CAT_INTEGRATION = {{ ssma_esocial_cat_integration|default(false) ? 'true' : 'false' }};
1538|
1539|    /** Tipos de ocorrência que o usuário logado pode finalizar como técnico (tags SSMA / mapa antigo). */
1540|    var EV_USER_TECHNICAL_TYPES = {{ user_technical_types|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
1541|    var EV_LOGGED_MEMBER_ID = {{ (ssma_logged_member_id|default(0))|json_encode|raw }};
1542|    {# Belt-and-suspenders: controller flag + roles Twig (Felipe 05/08 — Tenant sem botão Aprofundamento). #}
1543|    {% set _ev_admin_aprof = ssma_is_admin_aprofundamento|default(false)
1544|        or is_granted('ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN')
1545|        or is_granted('ROLE_TENANT')
1546|        or is_granted('ROLE_ADMIN')
1547|        or (is_granted('ROLE_MANAGER') and not (app.user and 'ROLE_USER' in app.user.roles))
1548|    %}
1549|    var EV_IS_ADMIN_APROFUNDAMENTO = {{ _ev_admin_aprof|json_encode|raw }};
1550|    var EV_CORRECTIVE_HIERARCHY_OPTIONS = [
1551|        { value: 'elimination', label: 'Eliminação' },
1552|        { value: 'substitution', label: 'Substituição' },
1553|        { value: 'independent_engineering', label: 'Engenharia Independente' },
1554|        { value: 'dependent_engineering', label: 'Engenharia Dependente' },
1555|        { value: 'administrative', label: 'Administrativa' },
1556|        { value: 'epi', label: 'EPI' }
1557|    ];
1558|    var EV_CORRECTIVE_MEMBER_OPTIONS = [
1559|        {% for member in allMembers|default([]) %}
1560|        { id: {{ member.id|json_encode|raw }}, name: {{ member.name|json_encode|raw }} }{% if not loop.last %},{% endif %}
1561|        {% endfor %}
1562|    ];
1563|
1564|    /** Pré-preenchimento (ex.: gestor/equipe do usuário com escopo por equipe). */
1565|    window.SSMA_EVENT_FORM_DEFAULTS = {{ ssma_event_form_defaults|default({})|json_encode|raw }};
Request #77 deepseek-v4-flash P:108.92K C:129 CR:107.65K CW:0 2411ms
Reasoning
The modal member list `_evMembersList` probably comes from `gestores` and allMembers. `_evMembersList` merges? Let me find where `_evMembersList` is built. Search.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
{"search_text": "_evMembersList", "file_patterns": ["templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig"]}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig
Match lines: 4
1476|    {% set _evMembersList = [] %}
1482|        {% set _evMembersList = _evMembersList|merge([{
1502|        {% set _evMembersList = _evMembersList|merge([{
1536|    })({{ _evMembersList|json_encode|raw }});

Request #78 deepseek-v4-flash P:109.16K C:97 CR:108.93K CW:0 1572ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig", "start_line": 1460, "end_line": 1515}
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig (Total lines: 7818)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1460-1515
1460|
1461|    /** Tipos que este usuário tem permissão explícita para criar (vazio = herda regra do cargo). */
1462|    window.SSMA_ALLOWED_CREATE_TYPES = {{ ssmaAllowedCreateTypes|default([])|json_encode|raw }};
1463|
1464|    /** Mapa membro -> equipe (primeira equipe do membro). Usado para selecionar a equipe ao escolher o gestor. */
1465|    {% set ev_member_team_map = {} %}
1466|    {% for team in teams|default([]) %}
1467|        {% for mid in team.members|default([]) %}
1468|            {% if ev_member_team_map[mid] is not defined %}
1469|                {% set ev_member_team_map = ev_member_team_map|merge({(mid): team.id}) %}
1470|            {% endif %}
1471|        {% endfor %}
1472|    {% endfor %}
1473|    window.SSMA_EV_MEMBER_TEAM = {{ ev_member_team_map|json_encode|raw }};
1474|
1475|    {# Lista (não mapa): Twig merge com chave numérica reindexa e quebra lookup por member id. #}
1476|    {% set _evMembersList = [] %}
1477|    {% for m in allMembersForMeta|default(allMembers|default([])) %}
1478|        {% set _mReg = m.registration|default('') %}
1479|        {% if _mReg == '' %}
1480|            {% set _mReg = '%07d'|format(m.id) %}
1481|        {% endif %}
1482|        {% set _evMembersList = _evMembersList|merge([{
1483|            id: m.id,
1484|            name: m.name|default(''),
1485|            position: m.position|default(''),
1486|            avatar: m.avatar|default(''),
1487|            area: m.area|default(''),
1488|            team_name: m.team_name|default(''),
1489|            registration: _mReg,
1490|            superior_id: m.superior_id|default(null),
1491|            supervisor_name: m.supervisor_name|default(''),
1492|            gerencia: m.gerencia|default(m.area|default('')),
1493|            work_shift_id: m.work_shift_id|default(null),
1494|            work_shift_label: m.work_shift_label|default('')
1495|        }]) %}
1496|    {% endfor %}
1497|    {% for g in gestores|default([]) %}
1498|        {% set _gRegMap = g.registration|default('') %}
1499|        {% if _gRegMap == '' %}
1500|            {% set _gRegMap = '%07d'|format(g.id) %}
1501|        {% endif %}
1502|        {% set _evMembersList = _evMembersList|merge([{
1503|            id: g.id,
1504|            name: g.name|default(''),
1505|            position: g.position|default(''),
1506|            avatar: g.avatar|default(''),
1507|            area: g.area|default(''),
1508|            team_name: g.team_name|default(''),
1509|            registration: _gRegMap,
1510|            superior_id: g.superior_id|default(null),
1511|            supervisor_name: g.supervisor_name|default(''),
1512|            gerencia: g.gerencia|default(g.area|default('')),
1513|            work_shift_id: g.work_shift_id|default(null),
1514|            work_shift_label: g.work_shift_label|default('')
1515|        }]) %}
Request #79 deepseek-v4-flash P:110.18K C:3.88K CR:109.18K CW:0 32949ms
Reasoning
So the members map includes `allMembersForMeta` (full allMembers) plus gestores (whole). So the map is full company members + gestores regardless. `superior_id` now present since members rows added it (from the diff 22697). So the client can look up members for display. The allMembersForEventPeople used as allMembers of the modal only affects the `#ev_people`/injured member lists etc, not the global member map. So maybe when team scope applies, the pickers would filter to team list. But because allMembersForEventPeople = full, those pickers use full too. But then this PR possibly intentionally wanted full people list. Given the analysis is inconclusive, I need to be careful about how strong I make this claim. There's a clearer issue: the removal of the server check "As pessoas envolvidas devem pertencer às suas equipes." is a definite deletion of server-side scope validation. Since the PR is an audit/correction on permissions, deletions of permission checks deserve scrutiny. But if the deletion was deliberate, that'd be noise. I could phrase it as a question to confirm, given the scope: "verificar se é intencional". Alternatively, a better concrete NEW finding relates to the guard for the responsible_manager search at 9151: `resolveSsmaPreventionAreaScope` is applied (area scope) even for responsible manager options for events. But wait, does the event domain have area restrictions? The option builder in the controller (buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions) also applies area intersection. But is the area scope relevant to event managers? Actually the area filter ids passed to the manager scope intersect came from `getSsmaPreventionAreaScope` (prevention area). This may be a mismatch if event managers should only be team-scoped... already note. Let me stop and settle on reporting 2 new issues: 1. **Removal of "involved people must belong to the user's teams" server-side check in validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope** (plus dropping the same restriction when building the modal people list) — the only remaining restrictions are team_id and manager_id. Supervisors with team scope may now reference any member of the company as an involved person (either via UI with full members list or direct POST). If scope restriction is still desired for people, that's a regression. Medium severity, category: security/scope. Suggest confirming intent; if not intended, restore people membership validation. Wait, I need to double-check whether there is another people check still present in the create path post diff (perhaps the normalizer restricts to active members only - that's not scoped). We did search "devem pertencer às suas equipes" found only action message at line 10527. Good. But before reporting, I want to be sure the deletion happened in this diff. Yes in the diff hunk at ~10424, the removed lines include that message. Good. However, is the removed people check applicable only to ROS? Actually the people check applied to all events with people_ids (via validate). It's gone. 2. **`appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser` duplicates a heavy full-company member/team load** (performance). Low severity. Also maybe another bug: In the elseif branch 13503-13507, appends events regardless of *detail* visibility guard `isSsmaEventVisibleUnderOccurrenceTeamDashboardScope` — but with new creator shortcut that returns true for events created by current user, so consistent. Let me look at a subtle bug in the elseif where for "isTechSpecialistOnly" with occurrenceTeamFilterIds==[] non-null triggers append even when not necessary and appends events without type filtering! Wait: For tech specialist (isTechSpecialistOnly = true), occurrences were filtered by type at 13367. Then the branch at 13481? Condition includes `!$isTechSpecialistOnly`? Wait the if at 13481 requires `occurrenceTeamFilterIds === null` to enter; tech has [] so skip the first branch and go to elseif? Wait, the main if includes many terms; tech specialist's occurrenceTeamFilterIds === [] which is NOT null; so it fails the whole if condition? Let me trace: condition to run member filter: `!$canManageSsmaOccurrences() && !sup && !areaSup && tag != area gestor && !gestorAdmin && occurrenceTeamFilterIds === null && occurrenceAreaFilterIds === null && !$isTechSpecialistOnly`. For a tech specialist, occurrenceTeamFilterIds = [] so false → skip first block. Elseif at 13503: `$company && $user && ($occurrenceTeamFilterIds !== null || $occurrenceAreaFilterIds !== null)` → for tech, [] !== null → true → appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser invoked. So tech specialist's own events get appended after type-filtering. A tech specialist might create events of types outside their specialty? Possibly a technician would create events only for their types. Anyway, appended regardless of tech type list — but the creator can see own events, per new rule. OK. But here's a bigger bug: The first branch (member regular) only runs when occurrenceTeamFilterIds === null. But what about a plain member whose tag yields scope null (line 10293) but area filter null? Their events append inside first branch at 13500. Good. Hmm, wait, note first branch condition ALSO requires `occurrenceAreaFilterIds === null`; so if a member (ROLE_USER, tag Membro) has area limitation (area scope restricted) but no team, they go to the elseif which appends their events. And then further down at 13513 there's plain prevention filter for inspections only. Fine. Now let's look at a subtle ordering bug at line 13306-13311: The team-scope filter keeps occurrences where created_by_member_id equals viewer member id. But the `created_by_member_id` will only be populated in the rows (event rows) if the SQL or map populates it. If the occurrences come from `loadOccurrences` via SQL UNION or `mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow`, event rows have created_by_member_id now. For legacy occurrence rows it's 0 → not kept by creator rule. That may be why they added `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser` which loads events via the entity mapping. And indeed for supervisor scopes, created_by_member_id in SQL rows... Wait, but `loadOccurrences` produces event rows via map (which includes created_by_member_id) OR SQL-based list that includes created_by_member_id? Let me quickly see loadOccurrences - uses SQL CTE? Confirm field present for events in SQL rows. There was a huge SQL near 12074 we didn't see; the map function is used in several places. Let me look at loadOccurrences function to see if it maps each event row via entity map. Given confirmed finding #3 it says mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow iterates all events of the company in loadOccurrences. So loadOccurrences calls map per event. So created_by_member_id present. OK. Now consider `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser` and ordering/duplication: In loadOccurrences SQL-paged for supervisors, events are paged in SQL. Then the elseif append loads all user-created events and merges - but the main page already includes the current page. On each page, the append might add the same events that would appear on later pages; i.e., a supervisor with >pageSize occurrences and one own event beyond page 1: page 2 includes own event (dedup on that page? On page 2 the own event may not be on page 1; but the SQL WHERE didn't filter them out, because SQL team filter includes team membership). Since own event of the supervisor belongs to their team, it's already included in SQL paging, so append adds only events that SQL omitted because they don't match team scope (the product intent: own events always visible even outside scope). However, because paging applies before append, an out-of-scope event appended appears once. OK. But with the SQL pagination, the total count used for pagination `occurrencesListTotal` counts only team-scope rows, while the actual visible list after append may be larger. That yields a list longer than total → navigation can "lose" own events. But since own events are always in scope if they belong to team. Only events outside scope appear extra. The "own events visible regardless" only matters for events with team_id outside current scope (e.g., after supervisor moved teams). Such events may exceed the paging total and appear only on a page not matching total; the final page may show them beyond count. Meh, edge case. OK, enough deep analysis. Let me read the loadOccurrences SQL to confirm the manager_id derived? No, skip. Let me also examine the standalone test file new changes: nothing more to add (confirmed finding 5). Now what about the templates rule for the deschar? Wait the user included rules for all three twig files, but those rules mostly apply to files already described. This diff's actual content is about the "leader manager" behavior. But the rules supplied per-file (esp. the SsmaController rules about plano de acao & approve modal) — the diff seems different from those described scopes! The rules were auto-suggested based on files. This diff changed occurrence manager permission logic. The review should follow generic + system rules and any relevant part of per-file rules. Given the confirmed findings already exist, I'll add the most defensible new issues: Let me nail down candidate issues precisely by re-reading the specific new lines. Potential issue: **`applySsmaEventManagerAssignment` for a user who CAN select managers, and whose requested manager belongs to `$allowed` but NOT necessarily a leader of the involved person** (e.g., a Gestor de Equipe choosing a leader of another team in the same scope? scope only restricts to leaders within teams they manage; probably consistent). Now, let me verify a genuine bug candidate about the manager validation for the event details payload when `type=ROS`: In `evSyncReportedByFieldForType`, the old code for ROS set manager to self for plain members. Now manager is own leader. However, server sends manager_id inside details; manager must be leader in scope etc. But here's a bug! For ROS type under old code, the reporter (manager) for a plain member was *their own memberId*. Under the new rule, the "manager responsável" for ROS = the leader of the reporter. But the person who *reports* a ROS (their own safety issue) - the ROS might relate to the reporter only; for ROS, the manager responsible = reporter's leader is plausible. OK. Let me choose to report 2 new findings: **Finding A (severity medium):** In `validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope` removal of people membership check. Existing code comment: create/update all pass through. This deletes an authorization boundary and is not required by the new manager rule (the check covers `person_id`, `people_ids` fields). Suggest either re-adding the scoping check or documenting product approval that scoped users may reference the entire company's people. But wait — maybe this removal was required because now the people involved might be the affected person from any team, since the supervisor reports about an event that happened to them... Actually, hmm. Let me search git history clues? The tests file references "Regra Brenda 03/09/2026 — Gestor responsável = líder imediato." Nothing about people. Given the diff's primary intent, the removal of people check appears to be an unintended side-effect of rewriting the function (they replaced the whole body). Worth flagging. **Finding B (severity low/medium performance):** `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser` reloads the whole company members+teams via `loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite`, duplicating work already done by the calling page (which already has $teams and map). The events fetched could be many; the current user created them; but team meta can be derived from existing $teamsById passed... but in the current function it receives only occurrences and not teams. Suggest passing teamsById from caller to avoid the heavy reload. On every listing load for supervisors (who have team filter), this is an extra full-company member+team query. Wait, but this function is called inside listing builder after the main data load already called loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite once. So a second full load. Actually let me check whether listing builder's `$teams` variable came from loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite earlier; yes at the start. So we add one extra heavy query per page. This is legitimate performance regression; low-med. Additionally, enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback per row does an entityManager->find for missing manager_id. But limited. Now also candidate C (medium): In the elseif branch at line 13503, for supervisors who have team scope the occurrences passed include paginated list; but the appended own events are NOT also checked against `isSsmaEventVisibleUnderOccurrenceTeamDashboardScope`? Not needed. Let me now finalize and consider also the case where `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser` is reached in both branches? Actually in the first branch (member regular), it is called after filterOccurrencesForMember and appendMissingActionLinkedOccurrences; in the second branch (supervisor scope), append is called but without `filterActionsForMember` etc. Hmm, note the elseif after append doesn't filter actions for member. actions already filtered by team at 13344. OK. Wait, actually look at first branch: When a user is a plain member with no team/area scope, at 13492 filterOccurrencesForMember (using isOccurrenceVisibleToMember which now includes creator via resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId per row) then at 13500 appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser loads ALL events created by the current user regardless of other filters. Since the earlier filter already allowed own events via creator match (for event rows with created_by_member_id), why also append? Perhaps because the SQL rows that were loaded didn't include created_by_member_id for rows from other sources, or events created by user but `created_by_id` referencing user while member resolution occurred after. Anyway double inclusion avoided by dedup. OK. Let me also do a quick pass for the `occurrence_view.html.twig` change of the title label: "Responsável pelo cadastro" and "Gestor responsável" for non-ROS. For non-event legacy occurrence `manager_id` maybe person... Not a new issue beyond finding #4. Let me confirm one possible template bug: For non-event legacy occurrences without manager and without creator, new "Responsável pelo cadastro" section shows "—" and then "Gestor responsável" section shows the manager or "—". OK. There is one more potential actual bug: **created_by_lookup_id fallback** — when created_by_member_id present (event rows) but the creator member has been REMOVED from company (isRemoved=1), created_by_member_id was resolved at mapping time using resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId which filters isRemoved=0. So removed creator is null → fallback to created_by_id user id → member_by_id['member_<userId>'] not found. So section falls to reported_by_member = manager_member; but for event row manager_id present (leader) — shows manager avatar under "Responsável pelo cadastro". That is finding 4-ish (already). Skip. Let me also double check a potential **data leakage** in the picker endpoint: The search `searchSsmaMembers` with `responsible_manager` does not ensure the requesting user is a manager who can select. But since plain members can't access it (field disabled; endpoint not role guarded), an authenticated member could call the endpoint directly and get list of immediate leaders (names) within their scope + own leader. That's a mild enumeration of leaders, but those leaders are members of their teams anyway or their own leader, which they can see elsewhere. No additional exposure. Not report. I should also examine the possibility that the search endpoint now returns wrong results for the "responsible_manager" when the caller is a plain member (since scopeIds may be null → allowed=all leaders in company) if they call manually: leaderIds = all leaders in company. A plain member could enumerate all company leaders (immediate superiors). This might be info the member shouldn't know? In the UI they normally see their team members. But company leader list probably accessible elsewhere? E.g., org chart. Could be borderline; skip. Let me also consider the change at line 22697 `'superior_id' => $superior instanceof CompanyMembers ? $superior->getId() : null,` in loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite. Adding superior_id for every member in company, to the template/JSON `SSMA_EV_MEMBERS_BY_ID` and allMembers JSON. Now the full company member list includes each member's superior_id. Is this data passed to the front-end for all viewers? In templates like occurrence_view, member_by_id from allMembers. allMembers JSON maybe used in JS with all member data. If supervisors previously had restricted member info, the superior field might leak chain-of-command data? But not sensitive. Wait, but we must be careful about the case where `loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite` is used for building team meta and passing to the detail pages, which previously filtered to referenced members. Including superior_id there is fine. OK let me now read the final piece of diff near 28625 (enrichOccurrenceManagerFields changed) to evaluate a potential bug introduced there.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 28610, "end_line": 28720}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 28610-28720
28610|        }
28611|
28612|        $resolvedId = $this->resolveCompanyMemberIdByDisplayLabel($name, $membersById);
28613|        if ($resolvedId > 0) {
28614|            $details['manager_id'] = $resolvedId;
28615|            $data['details'] = $details;
28616|        }
28617|
28618|        return $data;
28619|    }
28620|
28621|    /**
28622|     * @param array<int, array<string, mixed>> $membersById
28623|     *
28624|     * @return array<string, mixed>
28625|     */
28626|    private function enrichOccurrenceManagerFields(array $row, array $membersById, ?Company $company = null): array
28627|    {
28628|        if ($company instanceof Company) {
28629|            $row = $this->enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback($row, $company);
28630|        }
28631|
28632|        $managerId = (int) ($row['manager_id'] ?? 0);
28633|        $managerName = trim((string) ($row['manager_name'] ?? ''));
28634|
28635|        if ($managerId > 0 && isset($membersById[$managerId])) {
28636|            $m = $membersById[$managerId];
28637|            $row['manager_display_name'] = (string) ($m['name'] ?? '');
28638|            $row['manager_position'] = (string) ($m['position'] ?? '');
28639|
28640|            return $row;
28641|        }
28642|
28643|        if ($managerName === '' && $managerId > 0 && $company instanceof Company) {
28644|            $member = $this->entityManager->find(CompanyMembers::class, $managerId);
28645|            if ($member instanceof CompanyMembers && $member->getCompany()?->getId() === $company->getId()) {
28646|                $managerName = $this->ssmaMemberDisplayLabel($member);
28647|                if ($managerName === '') {
28648|                    $managerName = (string) ($member->getEmail() ?? '');
28649|                }
28650|            }
28651|        }
28652|
28653|        if ($managerName !== '') {
28654|            $resolvedId = $this->resolveCompanyMemberIdByDisplayLabel($managerName, $membersById);
28655|            if ($resolvedId > 0) {
28656|                $row['manager_id'] = $resolvedId;
28657|                if (isset($membersById[$resolvedId])) {
28658|                    $m = $membersById[$resolvedId];
28659|                    $row['manager_display_name'] = (string) ($m['name'] ?? $managerName);
28660|                    $row['manager_position'] = (string) ($m['position'] ?? '');
28661|
28662|                    return $row;
28663|                }
28664|            }
28665|            $row['manager_display_name'] = $managerName;
28666|
28667|            return $row;
28668|        }
28669|
28670|        if ($managerId > 0 && $company instanceof Company) {
28671|            $member = $this->entityManager->find(CompanyMembers::class, $managerId);
28672|            if ($member instanceof CompanyMembers && $member->getCompany()?->getId() === $company->getId()) {
28673|                $label = $this->ssmaMemberDisplayLabel($member);
28674|                if ($label === '') {
28675|                    $label = (string) ($member->getEmail() ?? '');
28676|                }
28677|                if ($label !== '') {
28678|                    $row['manager_display_name'] = $label;
28679|                }
28680|            }
28681|        }
28682|
28683|        return $row;
28684|    }
28685|
28686|    /**
28687|     * @param array<int, array<string, mixed>> $membersById
28688|     */
28689|    private function resolveCompanyMemberIdByDisplayLabel(string $label, array $membersById): int
28690|    {
28691|        $needle = mb_strtolower(trim($label));
28692|        if ($needle === '') {
28693|            return 0;
28694|        }
28695|
28696|        foreach ($membersById as $id => $memberRow) {
28697|            $name = mb_strtolower(trim((string) ($memberRow['name'] ?? '')));
28698|            if ($name !== '' && $name === $needle) {
28699|                return (int) $id;
28700|            }
28701|        }
28702|
28703|        return 0;
28704|    }
28705|
28706|    public function listMembersJson(): JsonResponse
28707|    {
28708|        /** @var User|null $user */
28709|        $user = $this->getUser();
28710|        if (!$user) {
28711|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'members' => []], 401);
28712|        }
28713|
28714|        $company = $user->getCompany();
28715|        if (!$company) {
28716|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'members' => []], 404);
28717|        }
28718|
28719|        $members = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)
28720|            ->findBy(['company' => $company], ['id' => 'ASC']);
Request #80 deepseek-v4-flash P:115.39K C:3.21K CR:114.05K CW:0 28244ms
Reasoning
In `enrichOccurrenceManagerFields`, the addition at the top calls `enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback`, which if createdByMemberId>0 and managerId<=0 loads the creator's superior to fill manager. So for every occurrence row lacking a manager_id, enrich will run an `entityManager->find(CompanyMembers, createdByMemberId)` + possibly access its superior; manager fallback is only when managerId <=0. This is executed wherever enrichOccurrenceManagerFields is called: in list building for details (loadOccurrenceListRowsForDetailView) and also possibly for the entire listing via enrich. Could add an N+1 if many legacy rows lack manager. But legacy rows probably have manager. In this change there's also `enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback` fills manager for ROS "reported by" when missing. But under new rule manager must be a leader, not just the creator's superior? Creator's superior is by definition the immediate leader. Good. Hmm wait: in `enrichOccurrenceCreatorAndManagerFallback` they set `row['manager_id'] = (int) $superior->getId()` only when managerId <= 0. For new events without manager (plain member w/o leader, saved?) fallback fills superior if exists. OK. Let me now consider one more possibility: the code sets the creator check in `isOccurrenceVisibleToMember` BEFORE the "own person" checks, which is fine. Let me decide final NEW findings to report. I'll report 3 new items: 1. Removal of people scope check + member list restriction (supervisors can reference people outside scope; server has no guard) - medium severity, security/maintainability, ask to confirm. 2. appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser duplicate heavy loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite call - performance low/medium. 3. Silent mismatch: `searchSsmaMembers` with `responsible_manager` returns leader options also to users who cannot change the manager (server doesn't gate by canSelect). Wait the search endpoint is reachable only when canChange true (client). But that's UI only. Actually for someone who can't change, the dropdown is disabled, so no remote. But someone can directly call endpoint - minor info. Skip. 4. Possibly report an actual bug: In the elseif branch (line 13503), for a **Supervisor/manager with team filter**, the newly appended events are not passed to `filterSsmaOccurrencesForMember`? Wait the elseif applies to supervisors whose occurrenceTeamFilterIds not null. Appended events may violate the *area* scope? No. Hmm. Let me re-examine append vs area scope. Actually there's a serious bug candidate: appended events for supervisors with area restriction are added to occurrences even when the events fall outside the area scope. The elseif includes areaScope restricted users with occurrenceAreaFilterIds non-null. But those users can see only their area; own created events may be in another area (created before assignment to that area). Then they'd see own events outside area. Is that intended? The comment in the new method: "Eventos cadastrados pelo login atual entram na listagem mesmo fora do recorte de equipe." Only team. But it also applies to area. That could leak own events across area restrictions—but the user is the creator, so probably acceptable for "own". But there's an important caveat: other event data (actions, people) associated might be from outside the area; those actions were filtered from actions list but the event row appears, revealing person names etc. But it's the user's own record. Fine. OK, I'll finalize with 2-3 well-substantiated comments and then read the whole file diff regions again to ensure no missed new bug, then produce comments. Actually, before finalizing, let me reconsider the biggest and cleanest NEW finding I may have overlooked: In the `$forResponsibleManager` branch of searchSsmaMembers and in `buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions`, area restriction uses `$this->getSsmaPreventionAreaScope($company, $user)`. But is the event manager domain using Prevention area scope? The code throughout SSMA occurrences uses both team filter (occurrence dashboard) and area scope (prevention). In the original `searchSsmaMembers` for the non-manager branch (elseif !forGestorModal) they restrict by area too. So it's consistent with the existing "occurrence dashboard" filtering approach that also used area for members. In the previous `buildSsmaEventModalGestores` for the area block they also filtered gestores by area. So consistency. One more potential real bug that might be worth reporting: In `buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions`, options include the **own leader** regardless of whether the own leader is still an active member present in `$allMembers`. ownLeader may be a removed member, or their superior in same company. In resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId they check superior is not removed and same company. So fine. Also, own leader may NOT be a leader in the `leaderIds` set? Actually superior with subordinate means they have at least one subordinate (the logged user) so they're in leaderIds. Unless the user's membership is removed? They filter only children active, but the logged user is active presumably. Good. Also `$managerAllowed = isset($leaderIds[$managerId]) && isset($allowedMembers[$managerId]); if ($ownLeaderId !== null && $ownLeaderId === $managerId) $managerAllowed = true;` but `$allowedMembers` includes only members of teams in scope; the own leader bypass works. OK. Time to write up final comments. Let me craft the comments precisely using existing diff lines for anchoring. For Finding A (people scope validation removal), anchor at the new line: ``` $managerAllowed = isset($leaderIds[$managerId]) && isset($allowedMembers[$managerId]); ``` Or anchor at the deleted? must anchor to added lines only. Use added lines: ``` $leaderIds = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company); $ownLeaderId = $this->resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId($company, $user); $managerAllowed = isset($leaderIds[$managerId]) && isset($allowedMembers[$managerId]); ``` That is a set of added lines in validate method. The comment: "A reescrita desta validação removeu a checagem que exigia que `person_id`/`people_ids` (pessoas envolvidas) pertencessem às equipes do usuário (mensagem 'As pessoas envolvidas devem pertencer às suas equipes.'). Junto com a remoção do filtro de `$allMembersForEventPeople` no modal, um supervisor/gestor com escopo de equipe volta a conseguir referenciar qualquer membro da empresa como envolvido (UI e POST). Se a intenção era só trocar a regra do gestor responsável pelo líder imediato, essa perda de restrição parece regressão; confirmar com produto e, se não for intencional, restaurar a checagem de escopo das pessoas." Severity: high? I'll say medium since not fully certain, but as a permission-related audit this is meaningful. Category: security. Hmm, rules say authorization enforced in client/template is a security concern. Removing server-side scope check is a real concern. But severity given ambiguity — I'll set medium. Wait, is there a chance that person/people membership in teams is intentionally no longer scoped for supervisors, since a supervisor can now choose a manager responsible of people in their area only? Actually new manager validation says manager must be within team scope. If involved people outside scope but manager inside scope... it could create inconsistent event (team A, manager leader in team A, but injured person from team B). Supervisor can fabricate. Let me keep medium. For Finding B (appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser reload), anchor at added lines: ``` [, $teams] = $this->loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite($company); $teamsById = array_column($teams, null, 'id'); ``` Comment about duplicate heavy reload. Also mention calling function while listing already loaded members/teams; and events list fetched company-wide could be large. Suggest passing already-loaded $teamsById (or restrict load) to avoid a second full company scan on each list load. Severity: low/performance. Let me maybe find a clean high-confidence additional functional bug... Let me think again about the observed JS inconsistency: The server computes `$ssmaCanChangeEventManager` via canSelect (memberIsSsmaGestorAdministrador OR tag 'Gestor de Equipe', TAG_GESTOR_AREA, 'Gestor Administrador' etc). But in the SSO SSR the modal's select disable is `not ssmaCanChangeEventManager|default(false)`. Good. Wait — the modal `_modal_event.html.twig` sets `window.SSMA_CAN_CHANGE_EVENT_MANAGER = ssmaCanChangeEventManager ? 'true' : 'false'` where `ssmaCanChangeEventManager = ssma_can_change_event_manager|default(false) or ssmaIsTenantAdminUser`. The controller's flag also returns true for `ROLE_TENANT` and super admin & ROLE_MANAGER. But note the `canSelect` includes these roles, but at the controller when `$company` null (e.g., loading listing without company?), `canSelect` returns true for super admin/platform via isGranted, and own leader resolution null. Manager defaults etc. In the data build with user null? Building occurs when company/user resolved; for tenant admin canSelect returns true always via isGranted even when no company. In the view data they also set `$ownImmediateLeaderId` only when company & user. OK. Everything else seems consistent. Let me now also double-check the one potential **real bug**: when a member that is the CREATOR of an occurrence but *NOT a manager* (plain member) and canChange false, editing: applySsmaEventManagerAssignment preserves existing manager. When a plain member opens *create* modal, default manager = own leader. If own leader is NOT in gestores list? ownLeader added by builder: in create path the options builder gets occurrences (the listing) and adds ownLeader to keep, appends row for ownLeader even if own leader not in memberById (entity find fallback). Then `ev_manager` options include the own leader row? The modal uses `gestoresList` variable = gestores_for_event_modal enriched. The select options constructed from `gestoresList`. But if the current user is a plain member with team scope? Wait can a plain member (ROLE_USER) register own occurrences? Yes `canMemberRegisterOwnOccurrence` true when member exists and type in allowed create types. For members the scope is null (line 10293), so applyTeamEventScope false; options = build with managerScopeIds null -> allowed = leaderIds + ownLeader + existing managers from occurrences (which for a member listing were already filtered later? no, options built before filter... in member's case occurrenceTeamFilterIds null & area null; the full listing occurrence list was used at build time BEFORE filterOccurrencesForMember, potentially entire company list at line 13210). So options include many leaders + managers. But field disabled anyway. OK. I'm fairly confident about 2 new comments (Finding A and Finding B). Let me also add a **third**: the per-request company caches `ssmaImmediateLeaderMemberIdsCache` not keyed by company could yield wrong leader set when a single controller handles multiple companies (e.g., network head loading subsidiary occurrences)? Actually is the code paths that call these functions reached with different companies in the same request? `collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds` called in search endpoint with one company; in builder path with one company. Network-head path (line 12825+) loads subsidiaries occurrences but does NOT build responsible manager options? Actually build options only executed once with the head company? For a network head with units (isNetworkHeadWithUnits), the whole modal option building code may be skipped? Let's check if this block runs only in non-network branch. We need to determine if in the network branch the listing builder continues to 13178? In the code, the `if ($isNetworkHeadWithUnits && $company)` branch handles occurrences then the flow continues to 12980 etc.? Actually this is one big method; both branches set variables, but only one executes. After branches, code continues at 12980 (enrich). The building block at 13178 runs regardless after 12980? It is at line 13178 after metadata. Hmm, yes after 12980? Wait we saw line 13178: `$teamsForEventModal = $teams;` that's in the same function after the branch. But if network branch, company is head, and $teams are for head company only; then building manager options calls collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company) head company only. And the network subsidiaries events... build uses $occurrences including subsidiary events (created_by etc.). Managers from subsidiaries may get added to keep as manager_ids (using head's leaders + subsidiary manager ids from occurrence rows). Then appendSsmaEventModalGestorRow checks memberById (head members) and find CompanyMembers by memberId; for subsidiary member ids, `$cm->getCompany()?->getId() !== $company->getId()` returns and skips. So subsidiary managers excluded. And leader IDs collected only from head company. So options for network head would be head leaders only — may be fine since they'd register events in the head company? But actually network head could register for subsidiary? Probably not in scope. Skip. Actually the per-company single cache is used within a request that deals with network companies in different methods? buildSsmaViewData is one request, company fixed to head or subsidiary; cache keyed... there is only one company for the current user; network subsidiary data loaded via loadNetworkOccurrencesForList but that doesn't call collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds for subsidiaries. Fine. But wait, caches could also be a problem if these functions are called with different companies across calls in a single request in *tests* or batch contexts, but likely not. Now to be safe I'll not report cache key issue. Let me now also re-examine the update flow: after apply, they call normalizeSsmaEventManagerInDetails? Let me read the update flow around 26650-26740 to see any order issue, and confirm they pass `existingDetails` correctly.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
{"end_line": 26750, "file_path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php", "start_line": 26600}
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php (Total lines: 28894)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 26600-26750
26600|     * Atualiza um evento existente.
26601|     */
26602|    public function updateEvent(Request $request, int $id): JsonResponse
26603|    {
26604|        /** @var \App\Entity\User|null $user */
26605|        $user    = $this->getUser();
26606|        $company = $user?->getCompany();
26607|        if (!$user || !$company) {
26608|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Não autenticado.'], 401);
26609|        }
26610|
26611|        $event = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\SsmaEvent::class)->find($id);
26612|
26613|        if (!$event || $event->getCompany()->getId() !== $company->getId()) {
26614|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Evento não encontrado.'], 404);
26615|        }
26616|
26617|        if (!$this->isSsmaEventVisibleUnderOccurrenceTeamDashboardScope($event, $company, $user)) {
26618|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Evento não encontrado.'], 404);
26619|        }
26620|
26621|        $data = json_decode($request->getContent(), true) ?? [];
26622|        $aprofundamentoOnly = !empty($data['aprofundamento_only']);
26623|        $existingDetails = is_array($event->getDetails()) ? $event->getDetails() : [];
26624|        $aprofundamentoStatus = strtolower(trim((string) ($existingDetails['aprofundamento_status'] ?? '')));
26625|        $aprofundamentoFinalized = $aprofundamentoStatus === 'finalized'
26626|            || !empty($existingDetails['aprofundamento_complete']);
26627|
26628|        $canFullEdit = $this->canEditSsmaEvent($company, $user, $event);
26629|        $eventTypeForAccess = (string) ($data['type'] ?? $event->getType());
26630|        $canAprofundamento = $this->canAccessSsmaEventAprofundamento(
26631|            $company,
26632|            $user,
26633|            $eventTypeForAccess,
26634|            is_array($data['details'] ?? null) ? $data['details'] : $existingDetails,
26635|            (int) ($event->getCreatedById() ?? 0)
26636|        );
26637|        $isAprofundamentoUpdate = $aprofundamentoOnly
26638|            || !empty($data['aprofundamento_complete'])
26639|            || strtolower(trim((string) ($data['aprofundamento_status'] ?? ''))) === 'finalized';
26640|
26641|        if (!$canFullEdit) {
26642|            if (!$isAprofundamentoUpdate || !$canAprofundamento) {
26643|                return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Você não tem autorização para editar esse tipo de ocorrência.'], 403);
26644|            }
26645|            if ($aprofundamentoFinalized && !$this->isSsmaAprofundamentoAdmin($company, $user)) {
26646|                return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Aprofundamento finalizado. Somente um administrador ou gestor administrador pode alterar.'], 403);
26647|            }
26648|            $data = $this->mergeSsmaEventAprofundamentoOnlyPayload($event, $data);
26649|        } else {
26650|            $data = array_merge($this->eventToValidationArray($event), $data);
26651|            if ($aprofundamentoFinalized && !$this->isSsmaAprofundamentoAdmin($company, $user)) {
26652|                if ($aprofundamentoOnly || $isAprofundamentoUpdate) {
26653|                    return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Aprofundamento finalizado. Somente um administrador ou gestor administrador pode alterar.'], 403);
26654|                }
26655|                $data = $this->stripSsmaEventAprofundamentoFieldsFromPayload(
26656|                    $data,
26657|                    (string) ($data['type'] ?? $event->getType()),
26658|                    $existingDetails
26659|                );
26660|            }
26661|        }
26662|
26663|        $data = $this->normalizeSsmaEventPayload($data, $company);
26664|        $data = $this->normalizeSsmaEventManagerInDetails($data, $company);
26665|        $data = $this->applySsmaEventManagerAssignment($data, $company, $user, $existingDetails);
26666|        $data = $this->applySsmaDescaracterPermissionGate(
26667|            $data,
26668|            $company,
26669|            $user,
26670|            $existingDetails
26671|        );
26672|
26673|        $eventType = (string) ($data['type'] ?? $event->getType());
26674|        $eventDetails = is_array($data['details'] ?? null) ? $data['details'] : [];
26675|        // Em modo só-aprofundamento o especialista já está autorizado; não stripa o que acabou de enviar.
26676|        if (
26677|            !$aprofundamentoOnly
26678|            && !$this->canAccessSsmaEventAprofundamento($company, $user, $eventType, $eventDetails, $event->getCreatedById())
26679|            && in_array($eventType, ['ROS', 'QUASE_ACIDENTE', 'ACIDENTE_PESSOAL', 'ACIDENTE_MATERIAL', 'ACIDENTE_AMBIENTAL'], true)
26680|        ) {
26681|            $data = $this->stripSsmaEventAprofundamentoFieldsFromPayload(
26682|                $data,
26683|                $eventType,
26684|                $existingDetails
26685|            );
26686|        }
26687|
26688|        // Draft vs finalize do aprofundamento (especialista / admin).
26689|        $wantsFinalize = false;
26690|        if ($aprofundamentoOnly || !empty($data['aprofundamento_complete']) || array_key_exists('aprofundamento_status', $data)) {
26691|            $detailsOut = is_array($data['details'] ?? null) ? $data['details'] : [];
26692|            $wantsFinalize = !empty($data['aprofundamento_complete'])
26693|                || strtolower(trim((string) ($data['aprofundamento_status'] ?? ''))) === 'finalized';
26694|            if ($wantsFinalize) {
26695|                $data['aprofundamento_complete'] = true;
26696|                $detailsOut['aprofundamento_complete'] = true;
26697|                $detailsOut['aprofundamento_status'] = 'finalized';
26698|            } else {
26699|                $data['aprofundamento_complete'] = false;
26700|                $detailsOut['aprofundamento_complete'] = false;
26701|                $detailsOut['aprofundamento_status'] = 'draft';
26702|            }
26703|            $data['details'] = $detailsOut;
26704|        }
26705|
26706|        // Valida apenas se type ou details estiverem presentes no payload (atualização parcial ok)
26707|        if (!empty($data['type']) || !empty($data['details'])) {
26708|            $validator = new \App\Service\Ssma\SsmaEventValidator();
26709|            $errors    = $validator->validate($data, [
26710|                'allowed_type_keys' => $this->ssmaOccurrenceTypeConfig->getAllowedTypeKeys($company),
26711|                'soft_aprofundamento' => $aprofundamentoOnly && !$wantsFinalize,
26712|            ]);
26713|            if ($errors !== []) {
26714|                return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'errors' => $errors], 422);
26715|            }
26716|        }
26717|
26718|        $teamScopeErr = $this->validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope($data, $company, $user);
26719|        if ($teamScopeErr !== null) {
26720|            return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => $teamScopeErr], 403);
26721|        }
26722|
26723|        $service = new \App\Service\Ssma\SsmaEventService($this->entityManager, $this->ssmaOccurrenceTypeConfig);
26724|        $prevType         = $event->getType();
26725|        $prevStatus       = $event->getStatus();
26726|        $prevImmediateRisk = !empty($event->getDetails()['immediate_risk']);
26727|        $prevManagerId = (int) ($event->getDetails()['manager_id'] ?? 0);
26728|        $wasRejectedApproval = $this->ssmaOccurrenceApprovalService->getState($event)['status']
26729|            === \App\Service\Ssma\SsmaOccurrenceApprovalService::STATUS_REJECTED;
26730|        $editorMeta = $this->resolveSsmaEditorMeta($company, $user);
26731|        $event      = $service->updateFromPayload($event, $data, $user, $editorMeta);
26732|
26733|        if ($wasRejectedApproval) {
26734|            // Readequação: reenvia tanto na edição completa quanto ao finalizar só o aprofundamento.
26735|            $this->maybeSubmitOccurrenceForValidation($event, $company, $user, true);
26736|        } elseif ($wantsFinalize) {
26737|            $this->maybeSubmitOccurrenceForValidation($event, $company, $user, false);
26738|        }
26739|
26740|        $registeredByName = trim(($user->getFirstName() ?? '') . ' ' . ($user->getLastName() ?? ''));
26741|        if ($registeredByName === '') {
26742|            $registeredByName = $user->getEmail() ?? 'Sistema';
26743|        }
26744|        $automationContext = [
26745|            'registered_by_name' => $registeredByName,
26746|            'type_raw'           => $event->getType(),
26747|            'new_type'           => $event->getType(),
26748|        ];
26749|        $flashApproval = null;
26750|
Request #81 deepseek-v4-flash P:121.09K C:3K CR:118.53K CW:0 24341ms
Reasoning
Now, in update, `applySsmaEventManagerAssignment($data, $company, $user, $existingDetails)` where $existingDetails is the original event details. For member editing own event with canChange false, and the existing manager_id=0 (created pre-rule with manager), and event now update: manager assigned own leader (if any) or stays absent. Then validation: if scope non-null and own leader == manager -> allowed. If ownLeader null and manager remains 0 → returns error 403 "Informe o gestor responsável" for scoped supervisors. So any scoped supervisor (or plain member with scope) with no immediate leader can't save ROS/draft updates, because the manager is required; but they'd need a leader. This is finding 1. There's an important subtlety for update with only-aprofundamento payload: `$data = $this->mergeSsmaEventAprofundamentoOnlyPayload($event, $data);` builds full data from the event then merges aprofundamento fields. In this case, if canFullEdit false, existingDetails = event's original details (including manager). But assignment uses `apply...($data...)` where details from merged event may include old manager_id. For plain member/tech editing only aprofundamento: canSelect false, existing manager_id = event's current manager (own leader likely). Keep preserved. Then validation: must still be leader in scope of the member (not the event creator!). Wait, the update by the tech specialist to do aprofundamento: this is where scoping is weird. Tech specialists scope is [] and branch allows techs (as long as they have permission tag links) and proceeds with only team_id validation? In `validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope`, if scope == [] and member has permission tags links (tech) returns null. So the manager/people validation skipped for tech. Good. Let me evaluate the aprofundamento finalization path where a manager (leader) completes the aprofundamento of another's event: canSelect true (manager roles), existingManagerId = original manager. If original manager = event creator's leader = someone else, and the editing manager is another leader; requested (not sent) or existing preserved. Good. OK, one more possible genuine issue: for update with canFullEdit true, data = eventToValidationArray(event) merged with payload. The payload's details may include manager_id from disabled select (disabled controls are not serialized by jQuery? but they collect values via .val()). Then apply may reject out-of-scope requested manager and silently revert to existing (fine) but if requested differs and existing equals own leader; keeps existing. If this leader no longer exists? OK. Let me now examine `isSsmaEventVisibleUnderOccurrenceTeamDashboardScope` to ensure creator shortcut doesn't bypass area scoping inappropriately for read actions like editing (updateEvent at line 26617 uses this gate). If creator shortcut applies, the event creator (even removed from team) may update an event outside scope. isSsmaEventVisible returns true for creator. Then updateEvent's next check is canFullEdit... etc. But if the creator no longer has permission to the type, canCreateSsmaOccurrenceType? update path canEditSsmaEvent probably checks. Fine. Now finalize. I'll produce comments for: - Finding A (people scope validation removal) - anchored on manager validation added lines in validate method. - Finding B (appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser reload heavy data) - anchored lines in that function. Let me get exact added lines text for anchors. For Finding A anchor: from diff: ``` + $leaderIds = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company); + $ownLeaderId = $this->resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId($company, $user); + $managerAllowed = isset($leaderIds[$managerId]) && isset($allowedMembers[$managerId]); ``` These are added lines (within the validate function, though the first two were also added in search endpoint... but same lines exist in validate method - anchored to them). But code_comment matches based on diff text; the anchor must exist in diff added lines. Yes these exact lines are added. For Finding B anchor: ``` + [, $teams] = $this->loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite($company); + $teamsById = array_column($teams, null, 'id'); ``` Both added lines. Let me also decide a third: maybe about own-events appended regardless of `status` draft/not; no. Also, I might include comment that in `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser`, calling loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite loads ALL company members again even when events empty? Actually early return when events===[] happens BEFORE this call? Let me re-check the function code: ``` $events = repo->findBy(...); if ($events === []) { return $occurrences; } [, $teams] = $this->loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite($company); ``` So the heavy load only happens when the user has created events. Still duplicates. Actually loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite($company) does heavy query; the listing already computed $teams and mapped event rows. To render appended event rows, only team label map needed for the event's team. So suggest passing $teamsById from caller. Now let me ensure there isn't already a confirmed finding covering this N+1. Confirmed #3 was N+1 resolution per creator in mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow (resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId per event). This new one is the extra loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite within append function (re-load full member+team). Distinct enough. Also report the **people scope regression** finding #? Not among confirmed. Wait, I want to re-verify confirmed #4 is about the occurrence_view twig, confirmed #2 about area vs team assignment, #1 about supervisor without superior. My new Finding A about people ids scope removal is not mentioned. Good. Let me make sure the code anchors correspond to diff added lines that appear only once. The line `$leaderIds = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company);` appears in validate function (added) and search endpoint at line 9152 was already present in the pre-change? Search endpoint added lines in diff too (`$forResponsibleManager...` block). The validate function lines are in the second hunk at 10424 region: added lines: ``` + $leaderIds = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company); + $ownLeaderId = $this->resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId($company, $user); + $managerAllowed = isset($leaderIds[$managerId]) && isset($allowedMembers[$managerId]); + if ($ownLeaderId !== null && $ownLeaderId === $managerId) { + $managerAllowed = true; + } + if (!$managerAllowed) { + return 'O gestor responsável precisa ser líder imediato de alguém e pertencer ao seu escopo de equipe/área.'; + } ``` Good. Now, the code_comment function expects `existing_code` exact diff lines; we can use the three added lines for Finding A anchor. Note: each comment lists its own existing_code exact consecutive lines to be located in the diff. Since these three lines appear in the diff near the removed people check, using the whole block is good. Let me also include exact quote for Finding B anchor. Now compose content in pt-BR. For Finding A: severity medium, category security. Actually let me reconsider severity: It removes a server-side scope authorization check that previously protected people (person_id / people_ids). Now it's gone. If this was deliberate, product would say supervisors can involve any company member. But because this audit PR is about leader managers, removing people check is likely unintended. But risk is limited to references within company (no cross-company leak). I'll mark severity medium (or high?). Since authorization by scope in SSMA seems carefully guarded, and supervisors previously limited, I'd mark as high? Actually the consequences: supervisors can select people outside their scope, and because the event's people are used in listing and "pessoas envolvidas" within events of team scope. The involvement of an out-of-scope member means that member's data (name, etc.) is attached to an event that another supervisor can see; and the out-of-team member might not be aware. Also the ROS display? ROS field is hidden in people list. Still, cross-team references could be a data integrity concern. Medium-high. I'll go medium. Also mention the counterpart deletion on the modal member list is part of same issue. For Finding B: severity low (perf) or medium? It causes an extra full-company load each time listing is opened by supervisors with events, plus `findBy` for user's events. That might double cost on a heavy hub page. medium maybe. I'll say medium/low. Use 'low'. Let me also consider a third comment about the standalone test being a re-implementation not integration test. But confirmed finding #5 already covers (tautologies + duplicating helper functions not hitting endpoints). So skip. One more thought: Is there a real bug where `$forResponsibleManager` uses `$ownLeaderId` even for platform admins (ROLE_MANAGER/TENANT) whose member is null — ownLeaderId null; scope null; allowed = leaderIds all company. That's expected for managers. Also note `$defaultCap`: for `$forResponsibleManager` true and `forGestorModal` true (since JS sets gestor_modal:1). But what if some caller uses `responsible_manager:1` alone without `gestor_modal`? Then cap 50 and `forGestorModal` false, but `$forResponsibleManager` branch still honored. That's fine; remoteExtraParams always set together in this PR. Alright. One more possible real functional issue I should verify because it's cheap: In searchSsmaMembers, `$limit` default 20 & cap 50 when gestor_modal false, but for responsible manager options when canSelect true and scoped... wait select options are SSR; remote search used when typing beyond the rendered list. For the manager field, select2 search triggers remote with responsible_manager param. Options: remote results limited to 50-100 entries. OK. I think 2 comments plus maybe a third low-confidence? Let's produce two concrete ones and maybe a third for `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser` regarding *order/duplication with paged listing*? Might be overkill. Let me add the append heavy reload as second. That's enough. Let me now double check the occurrence_view template didn't get any new XSS. New "Responsável pelo cadastro" uses same include patterns as before; names auto-escaped via member display. manager_display_name raw output `{{ occurrence.manager_display_name }}` pre-existing in old code and auto-escaped by Twig. OK. Let me generate the code_comment calls. One more check: for finding A anchor I should include the return message lines (added). Use these added lines which are within the same hunk. Let me produce the comments.
Tool Calls (1)
code_comment
Show Details
{"comments": [{"content": "A reescrita desta validação removeu a checagem que exigia que `person_id`/`people_ids` (pessoas envolvidas) pertencessem às equipes do usuário (mensagem antiga \"As pessoas envolvidas devem pertencer às suas equipes.\"). Em paralelo, o filtro que restringia `allMembersForEventPeople` às equipes/área do usuário no modal também foi removido. Resultado: um Supervisor/Gestor de Equipe com escopo passa a conseguir referenciar qualquer membro da empresa como envolvido, tanto pela UI quanto por POST direto, sem nenhuma validação de escopo no servidor para pessoas. Como o objetivo desta PR é trocar a regra do \"gestor responsável\" para líder imediato, essa perda de restrição parece regressão não intencional — confirmar com produto e, se não for desejada, restaurar a validação de escopo das pessoas (ou ao menos manter o filtro do modal).", "existing_code": "        $leaderIds = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company);\n        $ownLeaderId = $this->resolveLoggedMemberImmediateLeaderId($company, $user);\n        $managerAllowed = isset($leaderIds[$managerId]) && isset($allowedMembers[$managerId]);", "category": "security", "severity": "medium", "path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php"}, {"content": "Este método (usado na listagem sempre que o usuário tem escopo de equipe/área) recarrega toda a lista de membros e equipes da empresa via `loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite()` para montar `$teamsById`, mesmo que o request já tenha carregado os mesmos dados no fluxo principal do dashboard. Em uma página que já é pesada, isso dobra uma consulta de empresa inteira a cada abertura. Como só o nome da equipe do evento anexado é necessário, é melhor receber `$teamsById`/`$teams` de quem chamou (ou carregar apenas o mapa de equipe dos eventos retornados) em vez de refazer o load completo.", "existing_code": "        [, $teams] = $this->loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite($company);\n        $teamsById = array_column($teams, null, 'id');", "category": "performance", "severity": "low", "path": "src/Controller/SsmaController.php"}]}
(async)
Request #82 deepseek-v4-flash P:124.11K C:1.93K CR:124.03K CW:0 17063ms
Reasoning
Now I should give each file its own pass. Let me make sure I reviewed all 4 files in review_files: 1. src/Controller/SsmaController.php - reviewed extensively. 2. templates/ssma/occurrence/occurrence_view.html.twig - reviewed new template snippet (confirm findings 4 already from earlier; nothing new added? The template diff only shows re-organization of sections and label changes; I looked at it. New bugs beyond finding 4? Possibly label "Responsável pelo cadastro" shown when created_by null but manager set. Already finding 4. 3. templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig - reviewed new JS/HTML. Maybe additional issue: the select disable only in SSR uses `ssma_can_change_event_manager|default(false)`; but the JS `evSyncReportedByFieldForType` overrides disabled each type change; consistent. 4. tests/Ssma/ssma_event_manager_leader_rule_standalone.php - confirmed finding 5 covers. Let me do a final look for anything within the `_modal_event.html.twig` diff I may have missed: the `remoteExtraParams: { gestor_modal: 1, responsible_manager: 1 }` and disabled select... Wait an interesting issue: When `SSMA_CAN_CHANGE_EVENT_MANAGER` is false (member), the manager select is disabled in SSR but the `ev_manager` is part of the form; for the modal event editing, `evSetVal` might not work on disabled select? Disabled select can still have value set in JS. But the select2 initialization isn't run, meaning the native select shows. For a large member list, options are all leaders in the SSR select (gestoresList). OK. But here's a subtle point: If the manager cannot change, the field is disabled. `evSyncReportedByFieldForType` is only invoked from applyTypeBlock / evSyncCriticalityField — that is during type selection/change. In the *create* flow, defs.manager_id (own leader) is applied in applyEvCreateDefaults after open. That runs regardless of type. Good. However — look at line 6730-6731: `if (defs.manager_id) evSetVal('ev_manager', String(defs.manager_id));`. `evSetVal` sets value on the element. On a disabled select whose options do not include that leader? It would set value ''? evSetVal is generic; probably sets value if option exists else resets. If option missing (leader not in gestoresList because... own leader always added). OK. What about edit flow populateForEdit: at 6280 `evSetVal('ev_manager', det.manager_id);`. For a member who can't change and det.manager_id (existing leader) is not among the modal options for that member scope? Options builder adds existing occurrence manager ids to keep so it is included (when the event is in the listing occurrences passed). But what if a member opens an event for edit from the detail view? The occurrence list for modal options came from occurrences detail list rows... For the detail view (loadSsmaOccurrenceRows...) there's a dedicated builder that probably recomputes manager options based on the single event's manager? Let's verify there is a separate code path for detail that sets gestores_for_event_modal. Given the huge builder (buildSsmaViewData) is used for both listing and detail view (with occurrence_id). It loads occurrences for the detail view with all matching rows and then builds options from occurrences (post filtering maybe different). For detail, `occurrences` = all loaded occurrences, which in detail includes only one (or two). Options builder includes existing manager ids from occurrences, so editing the same event includes its manager. Good. So for an event loaded from the "stakeholder" path, allMembers may be restricted; the options include manager id because it's in occurrences passed? For a stakeholder's detail, manager options builder uses occurrences param? In the detail view path after tryLoadOccurrenceViewRowForActionStakeholder returns row (if matching empty). But then build data occurs before; if matching empty, gestores options built from the full company listing occurrences (which wouldn't include the specific event)? But the flow: `viewOccurrence` calls buildSsmaViewData with occurrence_id; build might load the occurrence in occurrences (search by ID). loadOccurrenceListRowsForDetailView is only used in fallback for approvers. I'm going too deep. I'll finalize now. But wait — I want to quickly check if there's possibly a genuine new bug in the first hunk of the diff (9139) regarding `$teamId` still used in searchSsmaMembers but when `responsible_manager` also has team_id param? no. I think we've done enough. Let me finalize by verifying that all four files got their own pass and then call task_done. Actually before finalizing, let me revisit the twig diff once more for potential NEW (not confirmed) issues: The change: ``` -{# ROS: "Relatado por" — pessoa física que registrou (criador) ou gestor que selecionou a si mesmo/outro. #} {% set is_ros_occurrence = occurrence.type_value|default('') == 'ROS' %} -{% set created_by_member_key = occurrence.created_by_id|default(null) ? ('member_' ~ occurrence.created_by_id) : '' %} +{% set created_by_lookup_id = occurrence.created_by_member_id|default(occurrence.created_by_id|default(null)) %} ``` `created_by_member_id` is member id; `created_by_id` is user id. When both null (legacy) → reported_by_member null; sections fall to "—". For legacy SsmaOccurrence detail rows created_by might be user id (int) but creator member resolved? mapSsmaOccurrenceEntityToListRow may not set created_by_member_id. So created_by_lookup_id = user id → member_by_id key mismatch → created_by_member null → reported_by_member = manager_member. So displays the manager in both sections (which is what confirmed finding 4 describes: fallback uses manager). The diff anchor in the template for finding 4 was lines: `{% elseif reported_by_member %}` etc. But actually one more new bug here: even when `created_by_member_id` exists (event rows), the member_by_id map is built from `allMembers`, which is the filtered referenced list for detail. `filterSsmaMembersToReferencedForDetail` adds both created_by_member_id and created_by_id to keep set (line 14966-14967). If creator member id == keep, the creator appears in allMembers passed. So created_by_member shows. Good. For ROS rows from legacy SsmaOccurrence? ROS is only event type? ROS likely stored as SsmaEvent; legacy ROS may not exist. The legacy entity SsmaOccurrence maybe includes older records. Not sure. OK. For the modal template, one more potential new bug: The `disabled` attribute is only added server-side based on `ssmaCanChangeEventManager`, but the JS `evSyncReportedByFieldForType` recalculates based on window.SSMA_CAN_CHANGE_EVENT_MANAGER. For tenant admin ssmaCanChangeEventManager true. Good. Also evSyncReportedByFieldForType triggers when type changes. But at creation, before a type is selected, the manager wrap is not hidden now; previously for member (pessoa física), wrap got hidden for ROS only (after type selected). Now before type, the wrap visible with disabled select default own leader? At applyEvCreateDefaults they set manager. So the select always displays. Fine. Given the confirmed findings plus my two comments are sufficient, I should call task_done. Actually, wait. I should double-check the people-check removal claim once more against the diff to avoid mis-tying: The removed lines were between the removed old gestor check and the `return null;`. The old function continued people checks; but note the personId came from `details['person_id']`, which for ROS/accident flows refers to the involved/injured person. For an accident event, the person may be from outside the supervisor team indeed (e.g., a visitor/contractor)? The code parse might treat person_id as the main injured employee. Business-wise a supervisor might register an accident where the injured belongs to their team. That check blocked others. Given cross-team accident scenarios exist for events on site, though, some may think this is intended relaxation... but because this PR is strictly about manager=leader rule, and the removal wasn't documented, I keep it as a flagged item with medium severity requiring product confirmation. Let me finalize.
Tool Calls (1)
task_done
Show Details
{"state": "DONE"}

memory_compression_task

Request #1 deepseek-v4-flash P:96.2K C:82 CR:384 CW:0 2112ms
Reasoning
Let me read mapSsmaOccurrenceEntityToListRow region 15070-15120 to see created_by_id semantics for legacy rows.
<message id="78" role="assistant"> <content> Vou verificar a semântica de `created_by_id` nas ocorrências legadas antes de fechar os comentários. </content> </message>

review_filter_task

Request #1 deepseek-v4-flash P:16.74K C:2.89K CR:2.05K CW:0 21126ms
Reasoning
Let me analyze the comments carefully. The comments are all about the SSMA event manager leader rule changes. Let me examine each. **c-0** (path SsmaController.php): Claims that when user's registration has no "Responsável" (superior) filled, a Team Supervisor without team scope can't change field, so save fails with 403 'Informe o gestor responsável.' Also claims old occurrences with manager_id not being "immediate leader" fail editing even with unchanged field. The existing_code quoted is in validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope (around line 10424). Let me look at diff. The diff shows: ```php $managerAllowed = isset($leaderIds[$managerId]) && isset($allowedMembers[$managerId]); if ($ownLeaderId !== null && $ownLeaderId === $managerId) { $managerAllowed = true; } if (!$managerAllowed) { return 'O gestor responsável precisa ser líder imediato de alguém e pertencer ao seu escopo de equipe/área.'; } ``` This is about the validation comment. Hmm, the comment describes that editing fails even with manager_id unchanged because manager_id isn't an immediate leader. Well, is that wrong? Actually the validation runs in payload validation. Wait, but is this validate function actually used? The diff at 10402 removes old validation and adds the new rule. This seems to be the described behavior. Is the comment factually contradicted by a diff line? The claim: "na edição, quando o manager_id enviado é igual ao já gravado, preservar sem exigir a regra de líder" — actually applySsmaEventManagerAssignment (in the diff) preserves existingManagerId if requested equals existing. Let me check: in `applySsmaEventManagerAssignment`, if `$requested > 0 && (isset($allowed[$requested]) || $requested === $existingManagerId)` then set requested. But that's in apply function, which runs before validation. However validation `validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope` doesn't know existing. Wait — actually the comment is a review comment on a protected subject? It's about behavioral change / permissions. Let's assess. It's about whether editing fails. The comment makes claims about runtime behavior that we can't fully verify. But does a diff line literally contradict central claim? The central claim: "a Supervisor de Equipe ... fica sem gestor default e toda tentativa de salvar é recusada com 403 'Informe o gestor responsável.', sem nenhum fallback." Hmm. Actually is this a claim of a bug that might be wrong? There's a fallback: In create action, the defaults set `manager_id` to ownImmediateLeaderId. If own leader is null, then no default. But a supervisor without scope (occurrenceTeamFilterIds null), the field is disabled (front). Actually SSMA_CAN_CHANGE_EVENT_MANAGER false for supervisor → field disabled. If no own leader... then no manager_id submitted → validation fails "Informe o gestor responsável." Hmm. This is a runtime-behavior claim. We cannot verify from the diff. The task says we should approve if not clearly proven wrong. c-0 is not clearly proven wrong by a literal diff line. Also the comment involves behavior of an error path which is a protected subject (behavioral change)? Actually the subject is about new validation rule causing failure - behavioral. Hmm, protected subject vetoes... "Behavioral or compatibility change — ... an altered error path". The comment concerns an error path. Approve c-0. Actually, wait — I should consider whether c-0 could be Ground A or B. But protected subject veto should be applied first. It relates to error path when saving. It's about a new behavior that would reject saves. Approve. **c-1** (path SsmaController.php): Claims the modal selector limits "Gestor responsável" to team scope AND area scope (code crosses managerScopeIds with area allowedMemberIds), but server assignment (applySsmaEventManagerAssignment) and validation use only getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds. For an Area Manager with restricted area and no team, this filter returns null and the server accepts any leader company-wide. Look at diff. In applySsmaEventManagerAssignment: ```php $allowed = $this->collectImmediateLeaderMemberIds($company); $scope = $this->getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds($company, $user); if ($scope !== null) { $teamMembers = $scope === [] ? [] : $this->collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams($company, $scope); $allowed = array_intersect_key($allowed, $teamMembers); } ``` So indeed the apply uses only team filter, not area scope. This is accurate based on diff. The comment claims an area-scope isolation bypass. This is about concurrency? No. About behavioral/security? It's an authorization claim. The comment is a security/behavioral concern but also an implementation claim that we can verify from diff text: the server assignment does NOT use getSsmaPreventionAreaScope, while the options builder (buildSsmaEventResponsibleManagerOptions) is passed $scopeMemberIds computed by controller? Let's check. Actually in the view code at 13177, `$managerScopeIds = $this->collectCompanyMemberIdsBelongingToCompanyTeams(...)` and then crossing with areaMemberIds. So options use managerScopeIds which is crossed with area. The server's applySsmaEventManagerAssignment uses only team filter IDs. So the claim appears consistent with the diff. Not contradicted. Approve c-1. But wait: does the comment's claim about `validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope` "usam apenas getSsmaOccurrenceDashboardTeamFilterIds" — hmm. In validation, at the earlier chunk (10402) the validation uses `$allowedMembers` passed in. Hmm, what is $allowedMembers in validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope? It's from a caller. We don't have the whole file. Not verifiable; approve. **c-2** (path SsmaController.php): Says resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId runs inside mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow which iterates all company events in loadOccurrences; each distinct creator triggers a new findBy (cache only avoids repetition within the request). N+1 concern. Diff shows in mapSsmaEventToOccurrenceListRow: ```php 'created_by_member_id' => $this->resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId($e->getCompany(), $e->getCreatedById()), ``` That matches. The claim is about performance — not a protected subject. But it's a runtime performance claim that we can't fully verify from diff. Is the claim contradicted? It says each distinct creator triggers a new findBy. resolveCompanyMemberIdByUserId does a findBy with a cache keyed by company:user. If multiple events share same creator, cache avoids. Distinct creators each call findBy. That is indeed the behavior visible in the diff. Approve c-2 (not proven wrong). **c-3** (path occurrence_view.html.twig): Claims in "Responsável pelo cadastro" section when creator unresolved (created_by_member null), fallback shows reported_by_member = manager... wait let's look at the template. The diff: ```twig {% set reported_by_member = created_by_member ?: manager_member %} ``` Wait — the new code sets `reported_by_member = created_by_member ?: manager_member`. Hmm, but is reported_by_member used? In the new "Responsável pelo cadastro" section: ```twig {% if created_by_member %} ...created_by_member... {% elseif reported_by_member %} ...reported_by_member... {% else %} — {% endif %} ``` The comment says the fallback exibe reported_by_member, which is the manager (because reported_by_member = created_by_member ?: manager_member). Actually reported_by_member = created_by_member ?: manager_member. In the elseif branch created_by_member is null, so reported_by_member = manager_member (since created_by_member null → falls to manager_member). So the fallback displays manager as "quem cadastrou". The comment says "report_by_member, que é o gestor responsável (linha 529)". Yes accurate per diff. Is this a behavioral concern? The subject — displaying wrong data labeling manager as creator — arguably a behavioral/display change (protected: a message/field/status). Also it's about template display correctness, a claim that we cannot prove wrong. The claim is factually supported by the diff text: `reported_by_member = created_by_member ?: manager_member`, so when created_by_member is null it shows manager. Actually is that right? Note created_by_member is computed earlier from created_by_lookup_id and member_by_id map. In the fallback elseif, created_by_member is null. So reported_by_member would be manager_member, yes. So the comment is consistent. Approve. **c-4** (path tests/Ssma/ssma_event_manager_leader_rule_standalone.php): Says last two assertions are tautologies (99 !== 10 and 10 === 10), don't execute the real functions. The test file duplicates logic in local helpers and doesn't go through real endpoints. Look at the test diff: ```php ok('Evento some para o criador se só olhar manager_id (regressão)', 99 !== 10); ok('Criador volta a ver se created_by_member_id == ele', 10 === 10); ``` Yes — these are literally tautological assertions. 99 !== 10 is always true, 10 === 10 always true. So the comment's central claim is literally supported: the assertions are tautologies. Ground B requires a diff line to literally contradict the central claim. There's none; the diff confirms the claim. So approve? Wait—approving means we keep the comment. Yes the comment is correct. Approve c-4. Hmm wait — is c-4 comment about a test file and claims the tests are tautological and worthless. It is a value/quality comment. It's true of the diff (assertions are tautologies). Value veto applies: it's about test quality? Value veto step 2 only covers style/formatting/naming/blank lines/comment wording/readability. A test correctness complaint is not in that list. But is it wrong? No. We don't remove correct comments. Step 3 Ground A: is the described code absent from subject file's diff? No — those lines are present. Step 4 Ground B: does any diff line contradict? No. So approve c-4. So all comments should be approved? Let me double-check each against Grounds A and B. Given the default is approve and grounds are narrow, I think approve all. Let me reconsider c-0 more carefully for Ground B. The claim: "ocorrências antigas gravadas com manager_id que não é 'líder imediato' ... passam a falhar na edição mesmo com o campo inalterado." Is there a diff line that literally contradicts this? The validation function returns error when `!$managerAllowed`. When editing an old ROS where manager_id = own leader? Hmm. If the editor is the same member whose leader they recorded as self... Actually old ROS manager was the reporter (member themselves), who is not their own leader typically. During edit, applySsmaEventManagerAssignment would... if member can't select and existingManagerId > 0, sets manager_id = existingManagerId (preserved). Then validation: managerAllowed = leaderIds[managerId] && allowedMembers[managerId]. If not and managerId != ownLeaderId → returns error. Hmm but wait — where is validation invoked? In edit endpoint presumably. applySsmaEventManagerAssignment preserves existingManagerId but validation would still reject it? Well the validation function might be called with $allowedMembers and checks. Actually the validate function is in the diff at line ~10402. Is it invoked on edit with unchanged field? We don't know. So not provably contradicted. Also, is c-0 about a protected subject? It concerns the error path in editing. The rule "behavioral change... an altered error path" — this is about new code causing errors. I'd call it protected anyway. Actually, we need not classify; simply no clear Ground A/B. Actually wait: there could be Ground A issue: comment refers to 'validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope' — c-0 quotes code with the validation content. That function's body is in the diff (at line ~10424). So it's in subject file diff. Let me also double check c-1 mentions "validateSsmaEventPayloadAgainstTeamScope" — but is that function present in the diff? The name doesn't appear but the function body at 10402 could be that function. We don't have the exact function name from the diff, but the code exists. Not Ground A. Everything approves. I'll call approve_all_comments. Let me write the analysis required? The tool approve_all doesn't need analysis. report_incorrect_comments requires analysis. I'll approve all.
Tool Calls (1)
approve_all_comments
Show Details
{}
Request #2 deepseek-v4-flash P:15.91K C:706 CR:9.47K CW:0 6503ms
Reasoning
Let me analyze these comments. Comment c-0: about SsmaController.php. It says the rewrite removed validation that required person_id/people_ids (pessoas envolvidas) to belong to the user's teams, and that the filter restricting allMembersForEventPeople to the user's teams/area was removed. Result: a Supervisor/Gestor de Equipe can reference any company member. Let me look at the diff. The original code in the diff (at line 10402-ish) removed a block that iterated $peopleIds and validated `isset($allowedMembers[$pid])`. Yes: ``` - $peopleRaw = $details['people_ids'] ?? ''; - $peopleIds = []; ... - foreach ($peopleIds as $pid) { - if (!isset($allowedMembers[$pid])) { - return 'As pessoas envolvidas devem pertencer às suas equipes.'; - } + if (!$managerAllowed) { + return 'O gestor responsável precisa ser líder imediato de alguém e pertencer ao seu escopo de equipe/área.'; } ``` So indeed the person/people validation was removed. And also the modal filter `allMembersForEventPeople` was removed (lines with `$allMembersForEventPeople = array_values(array_filter(...))` removed in both places). So the comment claims these removals happened and result in loss of restriction. The diff confirms the removal of the validation block and the filter. So Ground A? Not applicable; code is present. Ground B? The diff literally shows removal. The comment's central claim is that the validation and filter were removed — true per diff. So comment is correct. Wait, is this a behavioral change claim? The comment is about behavior — but it's a review comment, not a protected subject for us to approve/remove. Actually protected subjects include "Behavioral or compatibility change — ... an altered error path". This comment is about a behavioral regression... Hmm. But actually the protected subjects apply to the comments themselves — those categories are vetoes so we approve. Actually this comment asserts a regression is introduced. Its subject is the removal of validation — a behavioral/error-path change. Under the protected-subject veto we should approve. Anyway, we can't prove it wrong. Approve. Comment c-1: about performance — `appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser` reloads all members and teams via `loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite()`. The diff shows: ``` + [, $teams] = $this->loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite($company); + $teamsById = array_column($teams, null, 'id'); ``` That's present in the subject file's diff (in the new method appendOccurrencesCreatedByCurrentUser). The comment is about performance — the method calls loadCompanyMembersAndTeamsLite. The claim is accurate per diff: the method does reload. This is a performance/style comment, not a factual error. It claims it "dobra uma consulta" (doubles a query) — can't verify but we can't prove wrong. Approve. Neither comment meets Ground A or Ground B. Both are correct about what the diff contains. Approve all.
Tool Calls (1)
approve_all_comments
Show Details
{}