We need to group changed files semantically. Files: 1. public/css/company_customization/company-branding-form.css 2. public/js/company_customization/company-branding-form.js 3. public/js/metahuman-standard/components/_button_loading.js 4. src/Service/CompanyBrandingService.php 5. templates/company/components/_company_branding_form.html.twig 6. templates/company/my_company.html.twig Clearly most files relate to company branding customization: CSS, JS, service, templates. The _button_loading.js is a shared component likely used by the branding form JS? It was modified to support loading state for buttons, possibly used in company branding form. But it's in metahuman-standard/components, a generic component. It might be related to the form's submit button loading behavior. Need to decide if group separately or with branding. Let's examine typical patterns: If a generic component is modified to support a feature, it might belong to same feature if it's a dependency. But code review grouping often groups by feature. The _button_loading.js is likely part of the same change: adding loading state to the company branding form's save button. Since the branding-form.js may use it. Without seeing code, we can infer. All other files are company branding. The button loading is a shared utility, but modified for this feature. Could be grouped with them as "company branding form with button loading". Or separate as "shared button loading component". The instruction: "Files in the same group typically: Belong to the same module/feature; Have producer/consumer relationships". The button loading is consumed by the branding form JS (likely). So group together. Let's output a single group with all six files. Label: "Company branding customization form with button loading states".