Session: b227e492-07d6-449e-aa20-07c6fc0176a3
Coverage
7
Selected
7
Completed
0
Reused
0
Failed
0
Waived
Token Usage
5.09M
Prompt Tokens
112.97K
Completion Tokens
5.2M
Total Tokens
73
LLM Requests
4.87M
Cache Read
0
Cache Write
File breakdown 3 files
| File | Prompt | Completion | Cache Read | Cache Write | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| config/automations/offboarding.yaml,migrations/Version202609… | 4.96M | 101.87K | 4.75M | 0 | 5.06M |
| tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php | 127.49K | 6.34K | 112K | 0 | 133.83K |
| File Grouping | 408 | 4.77K | 0 | 0 | 5.17K |
Files Reviewed 7 files
- config/automations/offboarding.yaml
- templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig
- tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php
- migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
- templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig
- templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig
- src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Session Tasks 1 tasks
File Grouping 1 requests
grouping_task
Request #1
deepseek-v4-flash
P:408 C:4.77K
35716ms
Reasoning
We need group changed files into semantic clusters. Files:
1 config/automations/offboarding.yaml
2 migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
3 src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
4 templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig
5 templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig
6 templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig
7 tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php
We need infer relationships. Probably offboarding automation feature. Config yaml defines automation flow. Migration seeds offboarding esocial flow template. Service AutomationExecutionService is core. Templates list automations and flow_detail perhaps modified to support new feature/section. The template motivo_desligamento is related to termination reason in member guides, likely part of offboarding/esocial. Test SsmaEventValidatorTest maybe unit test for Ssma event validator, unrelated? Need inspect names: "Ssma" maybe Social Security? There is test changed. Could be related to offboarding? Let's think.
All files likely from a single feature: "Offboarding eSocial flow template and automation execution." The modifications to templates might be to add navigation or display. Why would SsmaEventValidatorTest be modified? Maybe test expectations due to logic change in AutomationExecutionService? But service is AutomationExecutionService, not SsmaEventValidator. Could be unrelated test fix. Need group by semantic relation.
We need group into JSON array. Need decide number groups. Options:
Group A: Offboarding automation feature: config/automations/offboarding.yaml, migrations/Version..., src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php, templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig, templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig. Also template motivo_desligamento? That's a member guide form template for termination reason, likely used in offboarding flow. Include there.
Test SsmaEventValidatorTest is likely unit test for an event validator; maybe it was changed because test fixture includes offboarding? The name "SsmaEventValidatorTest" does not obviously relate. Need examine from path: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php. Ssma maybe "Saúde e Segurança no Trabalho" or "SSMA" (Safety, Security, Health and Environment). Could be unrelated. But why changed with offboarding feature? The +2/-1 changes likely minor. Could be grouped with service if service's behavior affects Ssma events. But service is AutomationExecutionService, which may execute automation flows that generate Ssma events? Hmm.
Given limited info, need create groups that make sense. Rules: every file exactly one group, group max 10. We can output one group with all files if they are same feature. But test may be unrelated. Need assess from changed lines counts: config +21/-0, migration +451, service +333/-5, templates +1/-0, +1/-0, +1/-1, test +2/-1. The config, migration, service are big; templates minor. The test is likely adjusted due to a behavior change in service or related to Ssma event validation scenario. Let's search memory? "SsmaEventValidator" might be in domain "Product/Ssma", perhaps checks events before sending to SSMA (System Social Media Aggregator?) Not relevant.
We are code review grouping assistant. Need "semantically related clusters". Usually we group into related modules. If a test file is for a validator that is not changed, it's odd to include. But if change is in service that might affect Ssma events, the test is modified to cover. Let's reason from terms: "AutomationExecutionService" likely executes automation definitions (YAML). The migration seeds "OffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate". Config "offboarding.yaml" perhaps defines flow for offboarding with eSocial termination event. The templates under decision_system/automations/list_automations and flow_detail may render automations. Template "member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig" (termination reason) is clearly part of offboarding/eSocial termination flow. Test under Product/Ssma: SsmaEventValidatorTest could test validator for Ssma events inside automation execution? "Ssma" might be "Social Security Management Act"? Let's not overfit.
Could group as:
1. Offboarding eSocial automation flow: config/automations/offboarding.yaml, migrations..., src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php, templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig, templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig, templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig, tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php
Maybe all one feature. The test changes may be due to new flow template seed causing validator test fixture to include offboarding? But if test unrelated then grouping all in one is wrong. Need separate.
Let's inspect file paths in detail:
- config/automations/offboarding.yaml: Config for automation. Offboarding employee process.
- migrations/...SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php: Migration seeds a flow template for offboarding and eSocial termination event.
- src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php: Service to execute automations.
- templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig: Company module "member guides eSocial termination" with termination motive. Likely a template for the offboarding eSocial termination flow.
- templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig: Lists automation flows; modified perhaps to include offboarding config automation in list.
- templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig: Detail of flow; added automations info.
- tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php: Test in Product module Ssma. The Ssma event validator might be used during automation execution to validate API events? Let's hypothesize: "ssma" could mean "Saúde e Segurança do Meio Ambiente"? Actually in Portuguese corporate systems, "SSMA" = "Saúde, Segurança e Meio Ambiente" (Health, Safety and Environment). The eSocial termination event may be linked to SSMA? Or "SsmaEventValidator" validates events for "Social Security Management Act"? Hmm.
Given test name SsmaEventValidatorTest, it's testing a class named SsmaEventValidator. That class is not modified. But maybe the test's expected events changed due to new seed data? If there's a migration that seeds flow templates, and SsmaEventValidatorTest depends on a known set of "motivo desligamento" values? Let's dig deeper with imagined content. Product/Ssma could be "SSMA - Sage Social Media Audit"? Not likely.
Alternative: Group test with service because service is where SsmaEventValidator used? But service name is AutomationExecutionService, not SsmaEventValidator. Actually maybe the changed service lines (+333) include a new method for Ssma event validation? Could be executing automation flows and creating SSMA events. The test changed to reflect format changes.
Let's parse "AutomationExecutionService" executes automation definitions. It might call validators for events, one of which is SsmaEventValidator. If AutomationExecutionService is changed to pass more parameters or handle new event types, the unit test SsmaEventValidatorTest is updated. The presence of test change alongside large service change supports direct relation.
Need possibly group in two groups: one for offboarding feature and one for Ssma event validator? The files about offboarding include config, migration, templates; service might be unrelated to offboarding? Wait "AutomationExecutionService" is likely general service responsible for running any automation. It was modified to support config template and flow details. So service belongs with configuration and migration. The templates under decision_system are generic flow details/list; belong with service/config. The member guide template is specific to offboarding but may not belong to service? It likely is part of the feature's required template asset. The test is specific to SsmaEventValidator but connected to service changed behavior? Let's examine group labels.
Possible grouping:
Group 1: "Offboarding automation eSocial flow" containing config/automations/offboarding.yaml, migrations, templates/company/member_guides... Maybe also templates/decision_system list and flow detail? Those generic files may not be offboarding-specific, they are part of automation UI and service. They relate to all automations but modified to accommodate new flow. If grouping by module, "Automation engine and offboarding flow templates" could include all non-test files.
Group 2: "SsmaEventValidator test updates" containing tests/unit...
Would that adhere? Need every file in exactly one group, each group semantically related. The test might not relate to offboarding, so separate. But is grouping all production files together too broad? Maybe okay because they are all part of same feature (offboarding automation). Yet configuration, service, and templates are distinct layers but same feature. "templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig" and "list_automations" are not specifically offboarding but were changed to show automations; they are required for feature delivery. So group 1 "Offboarding automation flow implementation with eSocial template".
But why test SsmaEventValidatorTest? Is it related? It likely tests SsmaEventValidator not Offboarding. Could be in same commit because of new behavior in AutomationExecutionService. We need decide. Let's classify by changed file names and paths:
- config/automations/offboarding.yaml: config for an automation named offboarding.
- migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php: migration for seed offboarding eSocial flow template.
- src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php: service that executes automations.
- templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig: template for offboarding termination reason (eSocial).
- templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig: template changed, perhaps to include offboarding config in list.
- templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig: template changed, perhaps to include offboarding flow detail.
- tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php: unit test.
The first four are clearly tightly coupled: offboarding config + migration seed template + service executes + template for termination reason. The decision_system templates are related because in "decision_system" module automations are listed/detailed. Maybe offboarding config is a "decision_system automation" and those templates need to show the new section.
What is "Ssma"? Let's search memory from Brazilian systems: eSocial has events: S-2200, S-2299 etc. "SSMA" might stand for "Sistema de Saúde e Segurança no Trabalho"? Actually "SSMA" in IBM Maximo is Safety, Health and Environment. Product/Ssma could be a bundle with event validators. There's a "SsmaEventValidator" likely validates "Social Security Management Act" event? Wait offboarding is an eSocial termination event "homologação" and "aviso prévio". There is a "Termination motive" list. The template path "member_guides_esocial_termino" means "member guides eSocial termination". This feature perhaps in a "Saúde, Segurança e Meio Ambiente" module? Hmm no.
Let's not rely on hidden knowledge. Grouping should be based on explicit semantics. A test for SsmaEventValidator with tiny changes could be ancillary to the same change set but might not be semantically related to offboarding. We need label short theme. We can include all in one group "Offboarding eSocial automation flow and related automation execution updates." But if the test is not related, it's useless. Better to create a separate group for the test to isolate.
Question says "Group changed files into semantically related clusters that should be reviewed together." In code review, if a test file changes with +2/-1, it should be reviewed with the production code it tests. If production code SsmaEventValidator is not changed, test change is likely due to an external behavior change that affects SsmaEventValidator. But no production code under Product/Ssma modified. Could be unrelated to all other files? Then it's a singleton.
We need maybe identify "Ssma" relation to "AutomationExecutionService". The service belongs to "AutomationExecution" module, and Ssma is a product module. In a large repo, changed files often cross modules for a feature. "AutomationExecutionService" might be in src/Service/ root, not inside module. It may be a generic service used by decision system. "SsmaEventValidator" maybe a different thing entirely.
Let's imagine the type of change:
- config automations/offboarding.yaml added (new automation)
- migration seed offboarding esocial flow template added (records to DB)
- service modified significantly (maybe to execute new fields in automation config)
- template for decision system automations list/detail add display of new config fields
- template for member guide termination reason add translation? actually changed +1/-1, perhaps fix label.
- test validator changed +2/-1, perhaps because code style? Could be due to updated dependencies? Not enough.
If this is a single commit, there would likely be a branch "feat/offboarding-esocial" and issue. They deliberately changed service to support eSocial offboarding business rules, and tests in SsmaEventValidator needed because the service uses SSMA validators. Let's examine semantic by names:
"SsmaEventValidator" - "Event" could be automation events. In `AutomationExecutionService`, perhaps it uses an event dispatcher that validates events via `SsmaEventValidator`. Offboarding flow might require an event (e.g., offboarding event) validated by SSMA rules. So yes.
Could group test with service group. If isolated, review of test without context less useful. Since rules require groups of semantic relation, I'd group all files together? Let's think of reviewer: They need to review the offboarding feature. They see test change for SsmaEventValidator; they can ask why test changed. But grouping all together lets reviewer see test in context. However if test is unrelated to feature, grouping obscures unrelated change.
Let's examine paths in a production code file hierarchy: `src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php` likely in namespace `App\Service`? The test path `tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php` suggests the app has modules under `Product/Ssma`. Maybe `src/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidator.php`. There is no modified file in that module except test. Why would the validator test change if feature is offboarding? There may be a test fixture validation helper that date changed? Maybe not.
Let's consider if `AutomationExecutionService` in `src/Service` might be used by `Product/Ssma` to process termination events. The test could be for `SsmaEventValidator`, but the validator may delegate to `AutomationExecutionService`? Hmm.
Alternative group:
1. "Automation flow templates and execution" including config/automations/offboarding.yaml, migration, service, list/detail templates, and member guide termination template. Label "Offboarding eSocial automation flow".
2. "Ssma event validator test" just test file.
Would that satisfy? Yes, if test is unrelated. But if it's related, test would be grouped separately and lost. Need use clues from count modifications: Test +2/-1 is minor; migration +451 and service +333 are main. The other templates +1 line each. It seems all from same commit likely related to a particular feature named "offboarding eSocial flow template" where a new `motivo_desligamento` value? The test in SSMA: Could be in a suite of event validators, and one expectation is for "offboarding" event? But why validator name Ssma? Let's Google from memory: SSMA = "Social Security Management Act"? In Brazil, "SSMA" maybe no. "SsmaEventValidator" could be a class that validates whether a "dismissal motivation" is valid under the "SSMA" module. Actually termination in Portuguese "desligamento" has motivations. There is "SSMA" maybe "Saúde, Segurança e Meio Ambiente" (SMETA)? No relation.
Let's search memory from code variables? In Symfony projects, "Ssma" could stand for "Subscription/Service Monitoring and Alerts"? Hmm.
Maybe "Ssma" is "Single Sign-on Management Application"? Not.
Given the time, I'll craft groups based on clear clusters rather than force all. Need output JSON only.
We need decide final answer. Let's formulate:
```json
[
{
"label": "Offboarding eSocial automation flow and execution",
"files": [
"config/automations/offboarding.yaml",
"migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php",
"src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php",
"templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig",
"templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig",
"templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig"
]
},
{
"label": "SSMA event validator test update",
"files": [
"tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php"
]
}
]
```
But what if test should be in first group? We need more robust. Let's identify if `SsmaEventValidatorTest` is part of "offboarding motivation" because "motivo desligamento" could be a validation condition. The test path is `tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php`. "SsmaEventValidator" maybe validates "event" for a member, like termination event. The changed line in test +2/-1 could update fixture to reflect a new automation step. But since the test itself is for a validator, not for automation service, maybe it was touched by code style. Let's include in first group? Then group label would be "Offboarding eSocial automation and Ssma validation". But the group has 7 files. It's semantically okay if test monitors the validator within the offboarding flow. But "Ssma" is not clearly in label. Hmm.
Rules: "Files in the same group typically: Belong to same module/feature, have producer/consumer relationships, are i18n/config variants, share same directory and work together on a single concern." The test is in a different module/product and shares no directory with group, unless `SsmaEventValidator` uses `AutomationExecutionService` indirectly. Hard.
A code review grouping assistant should be conservative: only group files with obvious relation. If uncertain, create singleton. Therefore, separate test to singleton is safer. But maybe the user expects more than one group? They didn't specify min. There are 7 files; a group of 6 and a singleton is acceptable. Let's see if there's relation between test and "AutomationExecutionService": The test class name "SsmaEventValidatorTest" not "AutomationExecutionServiceTest". There is no changed production file under `Product/Ssma`, so the test change likely cannot be reviewed against its class. It may be a consequence of the service change: If AutomationExecutionService changed, why would SsmaEventValidatorTest not AutomationExecutionServiceTest? Maybe `SsmaEventValidator` depends on config/automations/offboarding.yaml? If the test loads all automation configs and validates events, offboarding yaml added could affect validation. Hmm.
Let's consider possibility that `SsmaEventValidator` tests verify every "flow template" in migration? But a validator wouldn't care. Could be changed because the test asserted a specific number of `SsmaEvent` subscribers, and service modifications changed subscriber count? No.
I think separate singleton is best because there's no clear relation without more context. However, in file grouping, sometimes all files in the same changeset are for one feature. But ask "semantically related clusters that should be reviewed together"; if every file is part of an offboarding feature, test could still be part. Let's compare file directories:
- `config/automations/offboarding.yaml` — all automations config
- `migrations/...offboarding...`
- `src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php` — generic service name
- `templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/...` — specific offboarding template
- `templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig` — UI
- `templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig` — UI
- `tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php` — module Product Ssma
Names "offboarding", "esocial_termino", "automations", "flow" together. Test path "Product/Ssma" not matching. I lean separate.
Let's output JSON with two groups. Need no explanatory text.
[
{
"label": "Offboarding eSocial automation flow and execution",
"files": [
"config/automations/offboarding.yaml",
"migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php",
"src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php",
"templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig",
"templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig",
"templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig"
]
},
{
"label": "SSMA event validator test update",
"files": [
"tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php"
]
}
]
Conversations 2 files
config/automations/offboarding.yaml,migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php,src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php,templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig,templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig,templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig 64 requests
plan_task
Request #1
deepseek-v4-flash
P:21.26K C:25.47K CR:1.41K CW:0
213612ms
Reasoning
O usuário pede para analisar as mudanças de código e produzir um plano de revisão estruturado. Devo seguir o formato de saída rigorosamente:
```
Summary: (descrição breve)
Issues
1. [severidade] (descrição)
→ (tool) (argumentos) — (propósito)
```
Preciso analisar em Português (pt-BR).
Vamos entender o contexto. É uma PR que adiciona:
1. `config/automations/offboarding.yaml` — nova automação `create_esocial_s2299_draft` para offboarding.
2. `migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php` — migration nova para semear template de fluxo.
3. `src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php` — mudanças principais:
- Novo action handler `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`.
- Mudança no `$isPayrollSystemSender` → `$isSystemSender`, adição de `system_sender` no config do email.
4. `templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig` — fix de condicional `prevEvts.desligamento` → `prevEvts.termino`.
5. `templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig` — label.
6. `templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig` — label.
Outro arquivo alterado (fora do grupo de review): `tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php`.
Preciso agora analisar riscos e produzir plano de revisão com issues ordenados por severidade. Não devo inventar problemas, mas devo analisar profundamente com o conhecimento dado.
Vamos analisar cada arquivo.
## Análise Geral
A mudança é em PHP 8 (provável), Symfony/Doctrine. O service `AutomationExecutionService` é gigante (linhas ~14.000+). Vamos analisar os pontos.
### 1. Migration `Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php`
Pontos de atenção:
- `isTransactional(): false` — migration não transacional. Em caso de falha no meio do loop de empresas, fica seed parcial. Mas a migration tem métodos `ensure*` que são idempotentes, então reexecutar é seguro... exceto que a migration é registrada como executada no Doctrine migrations — não pode simplesmente rodar de novo sem `--allow-no-migration`? Na verdade, migrations não re-executam por padrão; se falha no meio, a migration fica marcada como não executada? Depende. Com `isTransactional() = false`, se uma exceção é lançada no meio, o Doctrine registra? Geralmente migrations não-transacionais que falham não são marcadas como executadas — a exceção é propagada e a migração permanece pendente. Então reexecutar é possível. Os `ensure` methods tornam idempotente.
- A migration usa `JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, '$.seed_migration'))` — MySQL específico. Isso assume MySQL. O projeto parece usar MySQL (dado JSON_EXTRACT etc.). Provável OK.
- `down()` — procura templates com seed e deleta automações, atividades, estágios, template products, template. Não remove workflows/workflow_products criados pela `up()` — ficam órfãos (workflows "Fluxos de Saída" e workflow_products). Isso é um problema de reversibilidade: `down()` não remove o workflow criado caso não existisse antes (nem o produto criado). Isso gera dados órfãos. Porém o workflow pode já existir (slug fluxo-de-saida). O `down` só remove o que tem a marca seed_migration, mas workflows/products não têm essa marca. Então isso é uma limitação da reversão. Vale apontar como médio.
- A migration itera sobre todas as empresas (`SELECT id FROM company`). Para cada empresa, cria/atualiza workflow, template, stages, etc. Isso pode ser MUITAS empresas. Para cada empresa, várias consultas. Em produção com milhares de empresas, pode demorar bastante — mas migrations de seed são executadas uma vez. Existe risco de timeout dependendo da execução.
- **`ensureProduct`**: cria/atualiza produto com slug 'offboarding', mas ativa (`active = 1`) para todos — isso pode ativar produto offboarding em empresas que não o contrataram? Cuidado: products são globais na tabela `products`, não por empresa. `active = 1` global. Mas isso pode não ser problema porque o produto pode já existir. Atualização de `name` quando vazio. OK.
- **`ensureWorkflow`**: cria workflow "Fluxos de Saída" para TODAS as empresas que ainda não têm (slug fluxo-de-saida). Isso é uma mudança massiva de dados — criar workflow para todas as empresas, mesmo aquelas que não usam offboarding. Isso é um risco de negócio e de escopo: a PR cria fluxos e templates para todas as empresas sem opt-in. Potencialmente alta severidade em termos de impacto, mas é decisão de produto (seed para uso em produção). Vale apontar como risco: a migration semeará fluxos/templates de offboarding+eSocial para todas as empresas, inclusive as que não usam o produto, e o template referencia módulo `esocial_s2299`, que nem toda empresa tem habilitado. Impacto: poluição de dados, possibilidade de fluxos visíveis para empresas que não contrataram offboarding. Médio/alerta.
- `ensureStage` usa `LOWER(name) = LOWER(:name)` — não usa `COLLATE` mas ok.
- Em `ensureAutomation`, a existência é checada por `(flow_stage_id, name, trigger_type, action_type)`. Como a migration é regida por `seed_migration` nos templates, reexecução para template existente retorna antes. OK.
- A migration insere `advance_rules` como JSON vazio.
- A migration usa `product_slot_index IS NULL` na checagem de estágio. OK.
- `$this->connection->fetchFirstColumn` em migration com `lastInsertId` assume que insert foi feito na mesma connection — sim.
- **Possível problema de chave estrangeira**: `flow_automations.flow_template_id` é NULL na inserção. OK se a coluna é nullable. A entidade parece permitir.
- `down()` consulta `flow_templates` e faz deletes; mas não remove `flow_template_products` para template? Sim faz. Não remove templates de outras empresas? Faz loop para todos. Mas não remove workflow product nem workflow. Também não remove product (offboarding). Então reversão incompleta — sobra workflow e workflow_product. Como o `ensureWorkflow` não seta seed_marker, não há como distingui-los. É um problema real mas de baixo impacto de dados (workflow órfão). Med.
Outro ponto: os `INSERT` não especificam `id` — ok.
A migration usa funções específicas de MySQL (JSON_EXTRACT) — se o projeto suportar apenas MySQL, ok. Mas Doctrine Migrations com DBAL: em `down`, se as tabelas não existirem, retorna. OK.
**Tamanho da migration**: 451 linhas com muita lógica duplicada. Mas é seed. OK.
**Importante**: `isTransactional(): false` com muitas statements e sem try/catch — um erro em uma empresa interrompe tudo; reexecução exige reverter as alterações parciais antes? Não, os ensures são idempotentes, então reexecutar é seguro. OK, mas falta de transação não é crítico por causa da idempotência. Porém, os INSERTs sem transação em falha não deixam a migration marcada; mas há mudanças feitas em `products` (`active=1`, `name`), `workflows` (insert), `workflow_products` — e a reexecução simplesmente continua. Não é data corruption.
### 2. `AutomationExecutionService::executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`
Muitos pontos:
- `$company->getEsocialMode() === null` — checagem. Mas `EsocialMode` pode ter outro valor de disabled? Verificar entidade? É preciso confirmar qual valor indica desabilitado. O código assume null = disabled.
- Resolve company: `$flowInstance?->getCompany()`.
- Encontra `OffboardingMember` por flow member (`findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember` — método existente?).
- **Responsável por notificação**: `resolveEsocialS2299Responsible` — tenta `flowResponsible`, etc.
- **Evento**: `findOneBy(['esocialTrabalhador' => $esocialTrabalhador], ['id' => 'DESC'])` — pega o evento mais recente. Se houver múltiplos eventos S-2299 (o que é normal: um desligamento pode gerar vários eventos de retificação), pega o mais novo. Se o mais novo não é 'pendente' (`'existing_not_editable'`), não atualiza. Isso pode ser problemático: um evento "oficial" mais recente do que o pendente pode existir? Por exemplo, o colaborador tem um S-2299 já transmitido com status "processado" e depois o offboarding cria um draft novo? Nesse caso `latestEvent` é o processado, marcado `existing_not_editable` e um novo evento não é criado. A `eventStatus` fica 'existing_not_editable' e a automação não cria rascunho, só notifica. Isso pode ser intencional (não duplicar evento oficial não editável). Mas para um novo desligamento em andamento num segundo offboarding (recontratação + novo desligamento), o evento antigo processado faria o novo rascunho não ser criado — rascunho apenas em metadata. É uma possível edge case de negócio relevante: se o colaborador foi desligado uma vez no passado (evento processado no eSocial) e agora há novo offboarding, `findLatestEsocialS2299Event` retornará o evento antigo e o novo rascunho não será criado como evento — apenas a metadata. Impacto: dados de desligamento atual (novo) não entram no evento oficial; o responsável pode não perceber e o S-2299 real terá dados antigos. A checagem de idempotência por "mais recente" não distingue offboarding/companyMember ou situação. Isso é um problema real do fluxo de negócio — um desligamento novo exige um novo evento. Vale revisar com busca no repositório para ver se há mais de um S-2299 por trabalhador e se o evento pendente atual deveria ser associado ao offboarding. **Medium/high**? O objetivo declarado é: "A automação é idempotente: não deve duplicar evento pendente já existente para o mesmo contexto". O comportamento com evento antigo processado pode criar "rascunho registrado" sem evento — mas ainda notifica o responsável com review URL. Hmm. O caso crítico: empresa pode ter desligado e readmitido o mesmo colaborador. Então buscar o "latest" retorna o evento antigo processado, e um novo draft não será criado (nem mesmo atualizado). O rascunho S-2299 do novo desligamento ficará só na metadata. É possível que o time de produto considere esse cenário raro/fora do escopo. Eu apontaria como médio-alto com verificação.
- **Fluxo com `flush()` parcial**: Dentro de try/catch, acontece:
1. persiste evento (talvez), flush, persiste member... flush.
2. notificação via `executeNotify`.
3. Outro flush para eventId.
Há múltiplos `flush()` sem transaction explícita. Em caso de erro no meio (após primeiro flush), ficam linhas gravadas (evento criado) e o método retorna false (erro capturado). Não há rollback — a execução da automação pode deixar estado parcial: evento criado/atualizado mas metadata não; notificação não enviada. Próxima execução trataria? Próxima execução: `findLatestEsocialS2299Event` encontra o evento 'pendente' criado antes e o atualiza — idempotente, razoável. Mas se o evento foi criado (status pendente) e a segunda parte falhou (notificação), retry funcionaria e atualizaria / notificaria. Como o service de automação pode ser invocado múltiplas vezes, isso se resolve. No entanto, em ambientes em que a automação roda uma vez por trigger, a falha parcial pode deixar um evento pendente sem metadata/notificação. **Usar transação explícita** seria recomendação. Mas dado que automações de offboarding podem rodar sem transação em outros pontos do service? Preciso verificar se há padrão no arquivo. Usar code_search para ver se outros métodos usam `beginTransaction`. Vou planejar.
- **Injeção de `$config` no payload**: valores como `motivoDesligamento`, `dataConcessaoAviso`, `numeroProcesso`, etc. vêm do config da automação (definido pelo usuário na UI, possivelmente). São convertidos por `stringOrNull`, `dateOrNull`, `intOrNull`, `cpfOrNull`. Não há validação semântica de domínio (motivo válido, datas coerentes) — apenas conversão. Isso é aceitável como "rascunho para revisão". IntOrNull de "percAliment" — percentual pode ser decimal (ex.: 30.5)? `intOrNull` converte para int truncando. `percAliment` no eSocial provavelmente é numérico com decimais? O campo `percAliment` (percentual de pensão alimentícia) é tipicamente decimal (ex.: 30.00). Se `intOrNull` trunca valores decimais (30.5 → 30), isso pode corromper dado... mas como é um config de rascunho, e o campo parece preenchido como inteiro percentual, pode ser int na entidade. Preciso verificar tipo da entidade. Podemos usar code_search para `percAliment`. Na dúvida, aponto como baixo/médio: conversão perde casas decimais. `vrAlim` (valor) pode ser decimal e `intOrNull` trunca — perda de centavos. Vale apontar. Verificar a entidade `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` — os setters `setVrAlim`, `setPercAliment` recebem ?int? Se a entidade espera float/numeric, intOrNull trunca os valores. Preciso confirmar com busca (setVrAlim / getVrAlim). Bom candidato para code_search.
- **`booleanStringOrNull`**: converte para 'S'/'N' — mas o campo `IndPagtoAPI` na entity pode ser string (S/N). setIndPagtoApi(?string). OK.
- **`dateOrNull`**: aceita uma string e faz `new \DateTime($value)` — se config contém string com timezone inválida, null. Retorna `\DateTime`, mas setter pode esperar `\DateTimeInterface`. OK.
- **Notificação**: `executeNotify` com `'to' => 'company_member'` e `company_member_id`. `system_sender => true`. Feito. `$context['member_id']` contém id do companyMember. A notificação embute HTML com `$reviewUrl` escapado com `htmlspecialchars` — OK. Porém o `message` puro não inclui a URL — só o HTML. OK.
- O `metadata['esocialS2299Draft']` pode conter `reviewUrl` e `payload` com dados pessoais (CPF etc.) — em `sourceMetadata`, usado para auditoria e provavelmente serializado em algum lugar? Isso não é problema.
- `buildEsocialS2299ReviewUrl`: usa router->generate('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => id]) — rota do domínio da empresa do membro. Sem checagem de permissão — mas é só URL.
- **Não verificação de escopo de empresa**: `$responsible` pode ser de outra empresa? `resolveEsocialS2299Responsible` usa config IDs e repository `find(id)` — se o `responsible_id` configurado for de outra empresa, ele retorna um `CompanyMembers` de outra empresa, e a notificação vai para uma pessoa de outra empresa, com URL da empresa do membro. As configurações de automação são por template/empresa? A actionConfig vem da automação configurada naquele fluxo—possivelmente config dentro do próprio fluxo da empresa; risco de cross-company baixo, mas uma vez que `CompanyMembers::find((int) $configuredId)` não valida a empresa. Também se `company_member_id` do contexto for de outro domínio? `$config` pode incluir `member_id` do contexto da automação (arrumado no dispatch) — não do template. Pode ser da empresa corrente. Auditoria recomendada: checar a empresa do `responsible` e do `companyMember` se igual à `$company`. Isso é proteção extra. **Medium?** leve/médio.
- **Mensagem**: `'O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding. Abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar os detalhes.'` — Template vars interpoladas pelo `executeNotify` com o member que é FlowInstanceMember e contexto com member_id do companyMember. `{{member_name}}` pode usar o flow member? Preciso entender como executeNotify interpola os placeholders. Aparentemente usa o "member" do contexto. Aqui, `$member` = FlowInstanceMember, mas adicionam `$context['member_id'] = companyMember id` e `$context['esocial_s2299_review_url']`. A mensagem é enviada com "system_sender" true (Adriana) e o botão "ver detalhes" abre chat com Adriana. Como vai cair na conversa da Adriana. OK.
- **O title** está correto.
- **`$esocialTrabalhador = findOneBy(['companyMember' => $companyMember])`** — pode haver múltiplos registros de dados do trabalhador por companyMember? Em tese 1..1. Manter. Se houver mais de 1 (por exemplo, um registro por admissão), pode pegar o errado. É uma edge case. Verificar chave única na entidade via code_search no repo EsocialDadosTrabalhador.
- **`EsocialDadosRemuneracao::findByTrabalhador`** retorna um 1:1 (ou null). Se null: missing remuneration, nenhum evento criado. Notifica ainda assim com metadata — mensagem "dados pendentes impedem criar o evento oficial". OK — dado de trabalho confidencial, mas comportamento documentado.
- Mas: se faltam dados, o `$event` permanece null e `$metadata['esocialS2299Draft']['eventId']` null. OK.
- E se dados de remuneração existirem mas esquema de payload definir `dtFimRemun` etc.? `applyEsocialS2299Payload` não limpa os campos do evento existente para valores que não vêm no payload quando o payload tem chaves vazias — seta null. Em um update (evento 'pendente') de payloads, como os campos config não informados entram como null, o evento pendente anterior com dados pode ser apagado? `stringOrNull('')` → null → setMtvDeslig(null). Se o config da automação não define motivo, o `payload['motivoDesligamento']` = '' e limparia o evento existente de um run anterior que tinha o motivo (por exemplo, config alterada na UI). Talvez o problema seja: o fluxo cria o evento pendente preenchido, o usuário faz um rascunho manual e depois a automação roda de novo (o colaborador sai e reentra na etapa final?), e então `latestEvent` = 'pendente' → sobreescreve os dados com payload baseado em config actual. Isso pode descartar ajustes manuais do usuário feitos no rascunho pendente. **Risco real de perda de dados**: o evento pendente pode ser editado pelo usuário na tela do eSocial (preenchendo motivoDesligamento etc.) e, quando a automação roda de novo ao entrar na etapa, o código reescreve campos com base no config (que talvez esteja vazio) e `setUpdatedAt`, apagando o que o usuário preencheu. Isso é particularmente relevante: a idempotência da automação "não deve duplicar evento pendente" mas aí reescreve o pendente. O código diz: se pendente, `$eventStatus = 'updated'` e `applyEsocialS2299Payload($event, $payload)`. payload tem campos default vazios, logo `apply...` seta null → limpar campos preenchidos manualmente. A menos que a action config sempre traga os dados. No config de seed, actionConfig é apenas `to => flow_responsible` e `_default_automation_id`; nenhum campo de motivo. Então, na Etapa 3 do template seed, a automação entrar na etapa final: payload['motivoDesligamento']=='' etc. O resultado: cria evento S-2299 com mtvDeslig null e todos os campos null — mas marca status pendente. Ok para primeira criação; mas se o responsável preencher o motivo no rascunho (evento pendente agora tem motivo X), e depois o membro sair e voltar da etapa final (ou novo run de automação), os campos são setados para null novamente — **perde o preenchimento manual**. Isso é um problema real de integridade de dados (perda de trabalho do usuário). Além disso, o update pisa em cima de informação que pode ter sido validada. Vale ser um achado medium/high. Precisamos verificar se existing rascunho/screen edita a mesma entidade `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` com status pendente. Provavelmente sim (tela de revisão). code_search para `setStatus('pendente'` ou `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` usado no controller de edição, para confirmar que o usuário edita esse evento e que um update posterior pela automação sobrescreveria. Este é um forte achado a confirmar.
- **Também**: não há verificação de se evento pendente pertence a um companyMember que hoje está sendo desligado por este offboarding especificamente. `findLatestEsocialS2299Event` por trabalhador.
- **`applyEsocialS2299Payload`** redefine todos os campos a cada execução com base no config atual (que normalmente é vazio no template seed). Então um novo offboarding para o MESMO companyMember (recontratação+desligamento) na mesma empresa com evento anterior processado cria? Não, não atualiza se o latest foi processado. Mas se houver um evento "pendente" antigo órfão (por exemplo, um offboarding cancelado, ou rascunho manual abandonado), e aí um novo offboarding para um novo desligamento do mesmo colaborador ocorra: `latestEvent` é o pendente antigo (status pendente) → o novo S-2299 não é criado, apenas o evento pendente antigo é reescrito com a data do novo offboarding (dtDeslig novo) — possivelmente misturando dados do novo desligamento com o evento antigo. E o antigo evento pendente pode ter `id` referenciado em outro lugar. É um problema de idempotência baseada em status "pendente" global, que não considera qual offboarding/processo gerou o rascunho. **high** — potencial mistura/duplicidade em contextos de readmissão. Precisamos verificar se S-2299 pode haver múltiplos pending por trabalhador ou se há chave única. Provavelmente não há única; a semântica da tabela dos eventos eSocial é 1 trabalhador pode ter vários. Confirmar com busca.
- **Faltam verificações**: se `$event->setModo('INC')` etc. na criação. Não chamam `setId` — ok auto.
- **`$event->setNrInscTransmissor($this->onlyDigits((string) $company->getCnpj()))`** — se CNPJ nulo, '' setado. Poderia falhar constraint? Confirmar entidade. Baixo.
- **Dupla persistência/flush**: Na primeira branch, faz `persist($event)` e `persist($member)`, `flush()`. Depois, na segunda (não há segunda) branch atualiza metadata eventId e faz outro persist/flush. Redundante mas não bug.
- Uma **observação**: `this->entityManager->flush()` sem transação — e dentro de um request que pode ter outras escritas da automação em andamento, uma falha na notificação (fora de try? notificação dentro do try) retorna erro mas as escritas do flush já foram commitadas (autocommit). Em seguida o catch loga e retorna `['success' => false...]`. O chamador pode marcar a automação como falha e não tentar de novo, deixando um evento S-2299 pendente criado sem metadata, ou com eventId não salvo. Duplo flush para gravar eventId é frágil. O evento pendente permanece e poderá ser achado em offboardings posteriores como "mais recente" e sobrescrito. Recomendação: envolver tudo em transação única e avaliar o cenário de retry. **Medium**.
- `$member->getSourceMetadata()` — `getSourceMetadata` retorna array? É do `FlowInstanceMember`; possivelmente `?array` com `json` no DB. Eles usam `?? []` e `is_array`, ok.
- **Problema**: metadata atualizada do member + flush mesmo no caso de falha? Em caso de exceção em `executeNotify`, a metadata já não foi salva? Sim foi salva no primeiro flush (contém eventId set posteriormente — não!). Na verdade: primeiro flush com metadata eventId pode estar null (se criou) e depois, na segunda etapa, atualiza eventId e flush de novo. Se a segunda falha... não há muito.
- Em qualquer exceção após o primeiro flush, o `metadata` não conterá `eventId` real mas contém `'eventId' => null`. Isso é um estado inconsistente entre metadata e evento criado. Ponto menor.
- **Escopo**: mudança no `$isPayrollSystemSender` para `$isSystemSender` afeta TODOS os envios de chat/notificação do AutomationExecutionService que passam por esse trecho. Antes: apenas notificações de payroll com FlowInstanceMember sourceType payroll usavam Adriana. Agora, QUALQUER notificação com `system_sender` true também. O config `system_sender` é adicionado em `$emailConfig` para algumas actions anteriores (linha 7041). Isso pode alterar comportamento de notificações existentes que usam esse caminho — se algum outro lugar no service constrói emailConfig e tem chave system_sender sem querer? Adicionado apenas onde? A mudança na lista de emailConfig (linha 7044) parece estar num switch de request_notification? O `system_sender` só é usado no novo código. A mudança de `$isPayrollSystemSender` para `$isSystemSender || (...)` adiciona outra condição mas não remove a antiga; comportamento existente preservado (payroll segue igual). A única diferença: se `system_sender` bool false nas configs antigas, nada muda. Então baixo risco de regressão. Desde que `$config['system_sender']` venha apenas dos novos callers.
Porém: como `$config` vem de actions de automação, e `'system_sender' => $config['system_sender'] ?? null,` foi adicionado na montagem do emailConfig para o tipo de action em ~7041 — precisamos saber em qual bloco. O diff mostra que foi adicionado em um trecho onde se constrói `$emailConfig` com `reject_button_text`, `request_type_label`, `record_name` etc. Provavelmente para notificações e botões (request_notification). A nova action envia `'system_sender' => true` no `executeNotify`. Isso faz com que a notificação seja enviada como Adriana, caindo na conversa da Adriana. **Efeito colateral**: quem recebe a notificação que contém `approve_url`... no caso S-2299 não. OK.
- **executeNotify** é usado com `'to' => 'company_member'` — não com 'specific' — e com `company_member_id`. Como o bloco de resolução de chat mudou para system sender, precisa verificar se para esse caminho o recipient do chat é resolvido apropriadamente.
- **Resposta da notificação**: `notification` no array de retorno. OK.
### 3. Template motivo_desligamento.html.twig
Antes: `value="{% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab %}{{ prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab }}{% endif %}"` — bug fix para `prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab`. Correção correta. Isso é um fix simples. Possível problema: se `prevEvts` é null, `prevEvts.termino` — acesso Twig em null é tolerado no Twig? Se `prevEvts` é null, `prevEvts.termino` retorna null em vez de erro (Twig trata null-safe em atributos). OK.
### 4. Labels nos templates decision_system
`'create_esocial_s2299_draft' => 'criar rascunho...'` — Os dois templates têm mapas de rótulos e precisam ser mantidos em sincronia. Tudo bem.
- `list_automations.html.twig` — só label.
- `flow_detail.html.twig` — só label.
Esses labels estão dentro de `<script>`? Possível. Sem risco.
### 5. config/automations/offboarding.yaml
Regra: checar erros de spelling em yaml-keys (ignorar values). Keys: `id`, `type`, `title`, `icon`, `has_config`, `allowed_triggers`, `blocked_triggers`, `blocked_trigger_message`, `description`, `config_preset`, `to`. Comparar com id do config. Não há erro óbvio de spelling. Tipo `create_esocial_s2299_draft` corresponde ao service handler e às labels. Os id padrões podem ser strings consistentes. `config_preset.to: flow_responsible`.
Compare com outras automações no mesmo arquivo — elas têm essas chaves? Sim.
Nota: `allowed_triggers` inclui apenas `employee_enters_stage`, e `blocked_triggers` listagem. A action `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` exige `sourceType === 'offboarding'`. Nada mais.
Em YAML, cuidado com a chave `description` value ok.
**Problema possível**: a nova action está definida como uma ação utilizável no trigger "Colaborador entrar nesta etapa". Ok.
### Análise cruzada/migration e YAML
Vejo que a migration seed referencia automação `create_esocial_s2299_draft` com trigger `on_enter` e actionType correspondente. E o yaml define action id `create_esocial_s2299_draft`. Os `triggerType`s enumerados no yaml ("employee_enters_stage") — o service que valida automações converte? Ok.
### Prioridades de revisão por regra do usuário
Rules dizem para priorizar:
1. God object / lógica duplicada — `AutomationExecutionService` é ENORME (14k+ linhas; 25k?). A nova lógica (~330 linhas) adiciona mais responsabilidade. Sinalizar antes de qualquer outro achado. **Prioridade alta/review peso.**
2. Efeito colateral perdido em refatoração — no diff do service: a mudança nos comentários de `$isPayrollSystemSender` → `$isSystemSender` é refatoração com adição. Não há remoção de efeito.
3. Escopo da PR — template fix e labels no escopo.
### Vamos montar achados.
Considerando as regras "cada issue descreve local, natureza, impacto", com severidade e "→" tool calls para verificar.
#### Possíveis achados (em pt-BR):
**A. (god object / lógica duplicada) [alta prioridade de discussão — mas regra diz "sinalize antes de qualquer outro achado"]**: `AutomationExecutionService` já é gigante e a PR adiciona mais de 300 linhas de regra de eSocial (payload, conversões, resolução de responsável, URL) dentro dele. Cada automação nova cresce o service. Sugerir extrair em serviço dedicado (ex.: `EsocialS2299DraftService`) antes de adicionar mais. Severidade: medium? A regra do usuário coloca como maior peso. Mas não é bug funcional. Em um "review plan" prioridade: mencionarei como o primeiro issue (pela regra do usuário, maior peso). Realisticamente classificar alta/medium? É um "atenção". O output exige severidade entre high/medium/low. Vou classificar como medium com justificativa de que vai contra arquitetura e manutenção, e mais lógica de negócio duplicada. Mas as instruções dizem ordenar por severidade. O god object deve vir primeiro se eu classificar como maior. Entretanto, 14k linhas and counting — em uma PR que adiciona 330 linhas num service automações. Pela instrução do usuário, isso é de maior peso — devo tratar como ponto primário; se a severidade deve ser "medium" ou "high"? Como não é falha funcional/ segurança, não pode ser high pela definição do sistema. A descrição de severidade:
- high: security, data loss, crash, critical function failure.
- medium: performance, maintainability, or potential edge-case problems.
- low: style, readability.
God object = maintainability ⇒ medium.
No plano, os issues devem ser classificados e ordenei por severidade (high → medium → low) com numeração contínua. Dentro de severidades iguais, posso ordenar god object primeiro.
**Achados high candidates:**
1. **Sobrescrita de rascunho pendente já preenchido/validado** (perda de dados de usuário): quando `latestEvent` é um evento pendente (criado por execução anterior ou manualmente), a nova execução da automação reescreve todos os campos do payload (default vazios → null) e `updatedAt`, sobrescrevendo preenchimento manual do responsável na tela de revisão. O template seed não define dados do S-2299 no config da automação (só `to` e `_default_automation_id`), portanto payload = campos vazios; se o responsável preencheu o rascunho (ex.: motivo do desligamento) e depois alguém move o colaborador para fora e de volta à etapa final (ou roda a automação de novo), o sistema apaga esses dados. Esta é uma violação de integridade de dados e perda de trabalho; no contexto fiscal/eSocial, preenchimento de valor errado pode causar retificação indesejada. Para confirmar: verificar se o evento "pendente" é editável pela tela do usuário (mesma entidade EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) e se a alteração é frequente. → code_search por Edição do evento / uso de setMtvDeslig. → file_read? Também verificar se para "existing pendente" a intenção é aplicar somente campos default ausentes (merge) e não null-out. high.
Porém devo validar meu entendimento com a ferramenta correspondente no plano. Sim — issue 1.
2. **Idempotência/reaproveitamento de evento pendente antigo entre offboardings distintos / readmissão**: busca o S-2299 mais recente por trabalhador. Se o colaborador tem um evento "pendente" antigo de um processo/offboarding anterior (cancelado/abandonado), ou se uma readmissão gerar novo desligamento, a automação reutiliza o evento mais recente — reescreve no lugar de criar um novo para o desligamento atual. E se o mais recente é um evento já transmitido (não mais editável), a automação não cria rascunho nenhum realizável — fica como "existing_not_editable" e metadata sem evento; o rascunho não pode ser preparado para um novo desligamento. Isso pode resultar em S-2299 nunca criado oficialmente para o desligamento novo. A justificativa declarada da PR: "idempotente: não deve duplicar evento pendente já existente para o mesmo contexto". Mas a implementação não amarra contexto do offboarding ao evento (ex.: metadata/offboardingMemberId). Alto impacto — falha funcional (evento de desligamento não criado) numa situação realista (readmissão). Preciso confirmar se eventos S-2299 podem se repetir para o mesmo trabalhador (retificação ou readmissão) e como a tela padrão do eSocial faz — via busca `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` e uso do findBy. medium/high → vou marcar high? Pode ser discutível. A pergunta: quem tem acesso a essa feature — offboarding somente. O offboarding finaliza uma vez por colaborador por empresa. Para novos desligamentos, o colaborador precisa ser readmitido — evento S-2299 anterior existe. Novo desligamento exige novo evento S-2299 (o evento do primeiro desligamento foi transmitido com status ≠ pendente). `findLatestEsocialS2299Event` retornará o primeiro processado; `$eventStatus = 'existing_not_editable'`; nenhum novo evento nem rascunho é criado, apenas metadata. Dado que colaboradores readmitidos são comuns, a feature falha silenciosamente no segundo desligamento do mesmo CPF na mesma empresa. **High**.
Nota: como o payload completo seria criado na metadata e a notificação informa "já existe evento oficial não editável", o usuário entenderá? A mensagem da notificação ainda diz "Revisar desligamento eSocial (S-2299)" e o texto "O rascunho do S-2299 foi criado..." — na real, não é criado nenhum rascunho para o novo desligamento. O responsável clica, vê o evento antigo, confusão. alto impacto funcional.
3. **Falta de escopo/empresa na resolução do responsável e na validação de member vs company**: talvez. `resolveEsocialS2299Responsible` aceita um `responsible_id` do config e busca sem filtrar pela empresa do fluxo. Se config contém ID de pessoa de outra empresa (config corrompida/migrada) — pessoa errada recebe dados sensíveis de desligamento (CPF, remuneração?) — mensagem contém informação de desligamento + botão com URL. A notificação é Adriana, mas quem recebe é o responsável configurado; na UI, ao configurar automação, o usuário escolhe responsável da empresa? A action YAML tem `config_preset.to: flow_responsible` mas permite customização responsavel_id? `resolve...` lê `responsible_id` etc. Se sim, há validação de formulário? Não sabemos. Vale verificação. Marcar medium (vazamento entre empresas / dados sensíveis). Na verdade, para talvez não se confirmar, vamos colocar como medium com tool calls para checar origem de `responsible_id` e se há validação.
4. **Campos decimais truncados** (`vrAlim`, `percAliment` convertidos com `intOrNull`): perda de parte decimal → dado errado numa obrigação fiscal (eSocial). Se a entity/varchar guarda `vrAlim` como string de valor monetário com 2 casas ou o campo do XML aceita decimais, converter com int é perda. Não posso afirmar sem ver a entidade. Verificar tipos das entidades/colunas. Provável médio. Entretanto, o config da automação provavelmente nunca define esses campos por enquanto (template seed não define). Ainda assim código exposto. Pode ser considerado edge case future/config driven. Medium/low. Vou colocar médio com verificação.
5. **Sem transação -> estado parcial** (evento e metadata gravados em flushes separados; falha de notificação → evento gravado com status pendente, metadata sem eventId; retry do trigger pode não acontecer). Consequência: possível evento pendente órfão que será reutilizado indevidamente num futuro desligamento (sinergia com o achado 2). Recomendação: transação + unificar salvamento da metadata (evitar segundo flush). Médio (integridade) ou alto? A definição: perdida de dados / falha crítica. Aqui é uma falha improvável de consistência em exceção. Médio.
6. **Migration downs não removem workflow/workflow_products** (e products activated) — reversão deixa dados órfãos; replay em staging/teste acumula linhas. Médio-baixo. A rigor, a PR afirma que migration é documentada em docs (não no nosso diff). Down deixa órfãos. Também não transacional com muitas empresas.
7. **Migration roda para todas as empresas** e ativa/cria produtos/workflows/templates de offboarding+eSocial sem opt-in: pode alterar visibilidade das empresas (menu, fluxo) e criar dados em massa; especialmente `esocial_s2299` module habilitado no settings do template para empresas sem eSocial ativo. Impacto considerável. Verificar se a criação de template para todas as empresas é desejada vs. apenas empresas com produto ativo. Médio (decisão de produto) — mas no mundo de dados, se cria para 10k empresas, são 10k templates, 30k stages (~40k rows por 3 stages?), queries muitas. E timeouts. Talvez severidade média — note que os ensures são select-then-insert, uso intenso de queries; tempo estimado. Medium.
Nota: o template é criado para toda empresa mas somente quando há company rows; companys grandes não são problema.
8. **Produto 'offboarding': schema mismatch** — `ensureProduct` `INSERT INTO products (name, active, slug)`. Para produto com slug existente, atualiza `active = 1` global mesmo se a empresa não o contratou; produto com mudanças feitas pelo cliente pode preservar name; atualizar `active` pode ativar em todas as empresas (product global?). Verificar schema de products — provavelmente global (não por company). Se houver empresas que desativaram o offboarding por configuração de produto, esta migration reativa. Médio. Verificar.
Mas o products na arquitetura flowable parece global e produtos definidos por empresa via workflow_products/template_products. Não necessariamente "contratação". Menor.
9. **YAML spelling**: Regra para spelling keys — não achei typo. `allowed_triggers`/`blocked_triggers` lista inclui `employee_enters_stage`. tipo ok.
10. **Duplicação de strings de labels entre templates** (manutenção) — as mudanças são apenas acréscimos consistentes. Trivial — não report.
11. **Fix Twig** está correto. Talvez melhor simplificar mas ok — sem problema.
12. **`executeNotify` com placeholder `{{member_name}}`** — para FlowInstanceMember, o nome pode vir do companyMember correto? Como a mensagem tem `member_name` e o member passado é flow member (não companyMember do offboarding — que é o colaborador desligado). `findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember` -> o colaborador. Para notificação, member do contexto talvez precise ser o offboarding companyMember em vez do flow member. O membro do FlowInstance de offboarding provavelmente representa o colaborador (ou o fluxo?). Em offboarding kanban, FlowInstanceMember é o colaborador; sourceType offboarding; possivelmente member do offboarding já é o companyMember? Há OffboardingMember separado. `{{member_name}}` pode sair correto (flow member do colaborador) se flow member for o colaborador. Não dá pra saber sem ver como outros actions de offboarding enviam notificações. Talvez check no service `send_email_flow_responsible`? Prefiro não supor.
Mas atenção: `OffboardingMember` é uma entidade que representa o membro em um offboarding; flow member pode ser outro. `findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember` existe? não está no diff... Se não existir, o PHP fatal (method not found) seria pego no catch e retornaria false. Verificar com code_search se o método `findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember` existe em AutomationExecutionService ou em alguma trait/serviço. Sem isso, a action sempre falharia. A PR passou em testes? Testes unitários não executam service. Não há teste funcional da feature. Vou incluir tool call: code_search `findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember` e `findOffboardingMember` para confirmar existência. Se não existir — alta. Mas a PR diz testado manualmente. Métodos privados chamados precisam existir na mesma classe: `findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember` deve existir na classe (fora do diff) — possivelmente criado em commits anteriores ou era esperado. Difícil afirmar sem buscar. Incluir verificação.
13. **`getSourceMetadata` and `metadata`**: uses after `$member->setSourceMetadata($metadata)` — property do FlowInstanceMember. setSourceMetadata? existe. OK.
14. **strict comparing `$member->getSourceType() !== 'offboarding'`** vs em outros lugares usa constant ou SOURCE_TYPE? É string literal. Consistentes? Há constante `SOURCE_TYPE` no código? Poderia ser normalizado. Baixo/médio.
15. **Ambiente transacional**: nenhum.
16. **`stringOrNull(int etc)` no `nrProcTrab`** etc.
17. **Nota de segurança XSS no twig**: `value="{{ prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab }}"` escapado pelo Twig. OK.
18. **`htmlspecialchars($reviewUrl...)` com ENT_QUOTES** — correto; e o `message_html` é aceito pelo executeNotify sem mais escape? é HTML intencional da notificação.
19. **URL da notificação**: `'Revisar desligamento eSocial'` link para my_company_member_manage com `?esocialTab=desligamento`; **rota gera URL relativa**. Em e-mails/chat talvez precise URL absoluta — para dentro do app (chat) ok. Não.
20. **Ações não permitidas**: blocked_triggers etc com `offboarding_completed` — descritas. `offboarding_completed` trigger no service? Nada.
21. **Migration doc**: docs/database-changes/ criada (fora do diff/na PR). não report.
22. **A migration seed não pode se basear no `settings` caso `flow_templates.settings` guarde JSON em outra coluna ou coluna ausente em versões antigas**; se deploy em BD com schema desatualizado, a `tableExists` não cobre colunas. Mas migrations rodam antes/depois de outras de schema? Compartilhando o banco com migrations de schema historicas, uma nova migration que acessa coluna `settings` na tabela flow_templates pode falhar se a coluna for adicionada numa migration posterior na ordem. Ora, migrations são ordenadas por versão; a data 20260901171000 é nova, e as migrations que criaram essas colunas são mais antigas, portanto OK.
23. **Fuso/data**: 2026-09-01; irrelevante.
24. **Ajuste no diff AutomationExecutionService linha ~7041**: adicionado `'system_sender' => $config['system_sender'] ?? null,` em um bloco que parecia para email/notification — precisa entender se está no lugar certo para `request_notification`. Possível efeito: se este bloco é usado para montar $emailConfig que depois alimenta as mensagens de 'request_notification' e também para outras actions; não deve quebrar.
Agora, o "issue de god object" já foi observado. A pergunta agora é como transformar em plano: o output é um plano de revisão — com issues e tools calls planejados. Não podemos chamar ferramentas, apenas descrever as chamadas. Devemos incluir apenas issues plausíveis/reais com risco identificável. Muitos pontos precisam de verificação para confirmar. O plano deve refletir ações para confirmar/refutar durante a revisão.
Organizando com Summary.
Vamos estruturar:
**Summary**: A PR adiciona a automação `create_esocial_s2299_draft` para offboarding: novo handler no AutomationExecutionService (~330 linhas) que localiza o colaborador do offboarding, cria/atualiza o evento EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento ou apenas guarda o payload no sourceMetadata, notifica o responsável como remetente "sistema" (Adriana) via executeNotify, ajusta condições para remetentes sistêmicos; inclui config YAML da ação, migration de seed do fluxo "Offboarding com eSocial" para todas as empresas, ajustes de labels nos templates e correção de condicional no template de motivo de desligamento.
**Issues planejados e verificação:**
Severidades:
- high 1: Reaproveitamento/ausência de distinção contextual na escolha do evento S-2299. (Cobre readmissão e pendente de outro offboarding; não cria novo rascunho p/ novo desligamento ou reescreve rascunho de outro contexto.)
→ code_search: `findLatestEsocialS2299Event` — procurar chamadas e repos `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` / findOneBy('esocialTrabalhador') e entender cardinalidade; ver se eventos antigos persistem após transmissão. Aqui precisamos descrever tool calls.
→ file_read? para ver como o controller/tela cria eventos S-2299 (se há fluxo separado/valida se colaborador tem vinculo ativo).
→ code_search dentro de EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.
- high 2: Sobrescrita do rascunho pendente existente a cada corrida da automação: reescreve todos os campos do evento pendente a partir de config vazio (payload default = string vazia → setters null) — apaga preenchimento manual/responsável e eventStatus updated; mesmo a persistência 2 flushes complicam. Confirmar que evento pendente é editável pelo usuário (tela member).
→ code_search `setUpdatedAt` / chamadas update EsocialS2299... hmm, para a tela de revisão do evento pendente. O template/controller da área do colaborador cria rascunho do S-2299. Procurar no controller methods: `s2299` e `desligamento` route my-company-member. A tela de eSocial termino (`member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig`) mostra dados do "termino" a partir de Esocial... mas é um guia. Se event usados para UI têm `status pendente` e são salvos de lá. Planejar code_search: `nrProcTrab`, `setMtvDeslig`, e tentar controller. Ok.
- medium 3: Ausência de transação / flushes parciais deixam consistência frágil (evento criado como pendente, depois falha de notificação em um step; or eventId not recorded). Se invocado num pipeline de jobs em que falha = retry? Não sei. Recomendar transação em volta.
→ code_search padrão no mesmo service de `beginTransaction` para comparar práticas (ver se automações similares a eventos eSocial têm transação).
- medium 4: Criação/ativação de produto/workflow/template para TODAS as empresas sem opt-in com muitas queries — poluição, ativação de produto offboarding + template com módulo `esocial_s2299` habilitado em empresas sem eSocial; possível aumento de fila/lentidão e mudança de comportamento em empresas que desativaram offboarding. Considerar filtrar por empresas com produto/plano eSocial e validar em homologação antes de produção (PR diz validar).
→ verificar modelo de products (se ativo global e como uma empresa contrata/desativa offboarding) — code_search em schema/entity `Products`.
- medium 5: Reversão `down()` não remove workflows/workflow_products criados nem o `active=1` no products — dados órfãos ao reverter. Em migration usada para seed em produção, reversão parcial.
→ Não precisa tool. Mas pode tool call? Pode descrever file_read no próprio migration para rever... A tool é para nós em revisão; no plano posso pôr uma chamada para confirmar a ausência de marcação. Talvez.
- medium 6: `resolveEsocialS2299Responsible` aceita `responsible_id` sem validar empresa do template/company; a notificação de desligamento (dados pessoais + URL) pode ir para pessoa de outra empresa ao usar ID incorreto em config automations. Confirmar: de onde vem config e se formulários validam empresa.
→ code_search `responsible_id` no contexto automações/offboarding — config; procurar validação FP (UI automação) de responsible select e server-side. Se nada valida, é medium/high (dados pessoais de desligamento como motivo/vazamento). Para inserir numa obrigação trabalhista etc. Vou classificar medium e verificar.
→ code_search `resolveEsocialS2299Responsible`? e origem responsible.
- medium 7: Conversão `intOrNull` em campos monetários/percentuais (vrAlim, percAliment) trunca decimais — dado incorreto se config trouxer "1234.56". Confirmar tipo esperado das colunas/entidade (float/numeric/decimal?).
→ code_search/leitura da entidade `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` no diretório Entity e colunas vrAlim/percAliment.
- medium 8: god object/service gigante — PR adiciona 330 linhas com regra de eSocial completa dentro de AutomationExecutionService, incluindo conversões utilitárias (dateOrNull, stringOrNull...) que parecem helpers genéricos; service já concentra muita coisa; antes de duplicar mais notificação/payload, extrair para serviço dedicado. Classificar medium. Talvez o primeiro na ordem por peso do usuário; mas por severidade também medium então posso colocar como primeiro de todos os medium ou depois; o usuário diz prioridade "maior peso" antes de outros — vou colocar como issue 3 (primeiro dos médios) ou imediatamente após os high? Ele pede "sinalize isso antes de qualquer outro achado". A ordem no formato deve ser por severidade; com o mesmo medium, posso numerá-lo primeiro. Prefiro numerar: 1 high ... 2 high ... 3 medium god-object/duplicação do service como primeiro medium (logo após highs), reforçando a prioridade da regra. Não há conflito: ordenar high antes de medium pelo sistema, e god object primeiro entre os medium. Ou classificar o god object como "low"? maintainability em definição = medium.
- medium 9: template YAML/automações e labels duplicados... não precisa.
- medium 10: migration não transacional e sem estratégia de batelada; pode ser demorada. Porém, isso faz parte do issue 4. Não duplicar.
- medium 11: identificação do colaborador: `findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember` e `findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember` — não está no diff; verifico se existe; do contrário, esse método falharia sempre... mas testes manuais mostram funcionou? Talvez a implementação não esteja commitada? O código chama `$this->findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember($member)` — se não existe, chamada a método privado inexistente em PHP gera Error fatal. Mas o try/catch pega \Throwable. Não posso afirmar que não existe; buscar. Isso pode substituir uma verificação da issue. Vou incluir como parte de verificação de issue extra/baixo:
→ code_search `function findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember` e similar (`findOffboardingMemberForFlow`).
Se não existir, issue high — mas a verificação é para confirmar. O plano pode falar: "Confirmar que o método privado referenciado existe; caso não exista..."
Como é um plano, posso descrever tool calls que verificam.
Também verificação: muitos campos do payload como `motivoDesligamento` estarão sempre vazios na seed — a tela "revisar desligamento" tem um fluxo próprio de preenchimento do motivo com guia? O template motivo_desligamento.html.twig é um guia para preencher o motivo. O comportamento de criar evento pendente sem motivo com todas null e status "pendente" pode ser aceitável (rascunho em branco). Mas ter um evento "pendente" oficialmente criado com campos nulos pode fazer o sistema de transmissão tentar enviar evento inválido? Checar outros lugares que selecionam eventos com status pendente para transmitir (retificação S-2299) — risco: evento pendente novo pode virar transmissão oficial antes de revisado. Na verdade pendente = aguardando revisão. Se há job/rotina que transmite eventos `pendente`, um S-2299 incompleto (sem motivo/data?) seria enviado ao eSocial. Verificar como EsocialS2299 evt são transmitidos (status de 'pendente' se transforma em processado). O "rascunho" foi planejado como rascunho na entidade, mas a entidade S-2299 é usada para transmissão? A PR diz "evita criar o evento oficial" quando dados faltam — apenas se EsocialDadosTrabalhador ou remuneração faltarem. Se existem, o evento é criado "pendente" — checar se algo envia eventos pendentes automaticamente. Este é um possível **high**: evento S-2299 oficial (mesma entidade transmitida) é criado como "pendente" (sem validação de motivo) e pode ser transmitido/incluído numa fila de transmissão; enquanto deveria ser apenas rascunho. Mas o domínio: `status='pendente'` pode significar rascunho. Preciso ver com code_search quais status existem (pendente, transmitido...). Vou incluir uma verificação no issue 1/2: procurar jobs que leem pendente.
Provavelmente vou incluir muitos "→", mas o formato das issues: cada problem descrito com tool calls para verificação. Boa prática.
Vou cobrir com 8-10 issues. Importante: manter apenas issues reais com ferramenta.
Vou revisar os templates para não inventar:
- No `flow_detail.html.twig`, é um dicionário JS? key-value map. Apenas label. Sem issues.
- O template `motivo_desligamento.html.twig` — a correção. O IF original fazia referência a `prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` — era bug: se `prevEvts.termino` null, Twig retorna null? Em Twig, acessar property em null gera erro? A partir do Twig 2/3, acessar atributo de null gera erro (não é null-safe como JS). Na verdade: Twig: `foo.bar` onde `foo` é null lança exceção? Se `foo` é null e você acessa `foo.bar`, o Twig tenta acessar attribute de null: para objetos null, retorna null? Deixe-me pensar: Twig's attribute on null: In Twig, se você tem `{{ null.foo }}`, isso retorna nada? Não, ele lança? Twig default: Quando a variável é null e acessa um atributo, o resultado é null no Twig 3? Ex: `{{ app.user.email }}` quando user é null — gera um erro "Impossible to access an attribute ("email") on a null variable" no Twig 2+ quando o atributo não é um "defined" checado. Sim, lança exceção, a menos que use `app.user?.email` (null-safe operator Twig 2.12+? Twig suporta `?.` desde 2.12). O usuário então tinha um bug; a correção `{% if prevEvts.termino and ... %}` evita o acesso. Correto.
Só um detalhe: se `prevEvts` em si for null, `prevEvts.termino` acessa null → erro. O diff apenas troca `prevEvts.desligamento` por `prevEvts.termino`. Então se `prevEvts` pode ser null (sem eventos), o erro original teria ocorrido no primeiro acesso de desligamento e a condicional atual ainda sofreria para quando `prevEvts` null? Se `prevEvts` null em si, erro. Não sabemos o contexto do controller (always array). Se prevEvts é um array com chaves? Ex: `prevEvts.termino` onde prevEvts é um array de objetos; o `and` avalia `prevEvts.termino` apenas se `prevEvts` não null? Na linha modificada, avalia o primeiro operando `prevEvts.termino` que em null daria erro. Mas antes `prevEvts.desligamento` em null daria erro também. Portanto o bug anterior não era causado por prevEvts null. O bug era: prevEvts.desligamento true mas prevEvts.termino null → `and` curto-circuito? O operador `and` no Twig: se `prevEvts.desligamento` for truthy (evento desligamento existe), avalia `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` e lança se termino null. Agora correto.
Pronto.
**Sobre YAML e service**: A action YAML define `has_config: false` — mas o config da automação pode ter config_preset com 'to' — sem UI de config. O service handler aceita config responsible via config... como usuário define `responsible_id` se `has_config: false`? Os `_default_automation_id` em flow_automations viram? Em geral as actions sem config têm só preset. OK.
**Agora**, dado que o "rules" dizem para priorizar god object, vamos incluir primeiro em médios. Mas devo respeitar o formato: Issues numerados contínuos ordenado por severidade decrescente. Farei:
1. [high] — distinção contextual/readmissão; reuso de eventos pendentes alheios e não criação de novo S-2299 quando já existe evento oficiais; consequência: colaborador readmitido com segundo desligamento fica sem rascunho real;/ ou pior ainda reescreve evento pendente de outro processo com dados (ou o contrário) criando retificação incorreta.
→ code_search para `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` e seus findOneBy/repos/usos na transmissão para entender cardinalidade por trabalhador; ver status e o ciclo de vida.
→ code_search por métodos que selecionam eventos pendentes para envio ao eSocial (status 'pendente', processamento), para ver se o rascunho "pendenteÔ pode ir para transmissão automática.
2. [high] — sobrescrever evento pendente preenchido e validado na tela por execução da automação com config sem dados (null nos campos). Explicar consequência com exemplo. Confirmar que a tela de edição usa entidade Esocial... e que config seed está vazio.
→ code_search rotas/controllers para esocial desligamento/edicao.
→ Nesta issue pode-se colocar mais de um argumento: call para ver arquivos (linhas do config seed migration: a automação da Etapa 3 define apenas `to` e `_default_automation_id` — nenhum dado de desligamento), etc. E no service `applyEsocialS2299Payload` seta cada campo para null quando vazio.
Tool call: `file_read` migration (já visto) ou code_search no código? Para confirmação: code_search de `setDtDeslig`/`applyEsocialS2299Payload` ocorre?
3. [medium] — `AutomationExecutionService` god object: nova lógica de 330+ linhas com payload/conversões utilitárias poderia viver em service. O usuário pede high weight. Como explicado, podemos classificar medium; colocar como issue 3 (primeiro médio) — mas devemos manter descrição conforme user rule: comentário direto: "O AutomationExecutionService já é um service gigante e a lógica nova de rascunho (payload, CPF, datas...) duplica o padrão de montagem dentro dele ..." etc.
4. [medium] — sem transação, flushes separados e estado parcial; falha no notify pode persistir evento/metadata parcial e eventId ausente. recomendar transação no handler ou mover para serviço dedicado com transaction. Tools: code_search `beginTransaction` no AutomationExecutionService e na classe OffboardingToRecruitment para padrão.
Um detalhe: `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` retorna `['success' => false, ...]` para erros esperados: essas actions de automação que retornam erro podem marcar que a execução falhou? Depende do caller que faz match de action type no run — se o chamador interpreta array sem 'success'… sem necessidade.
5. [medium] — resolução de responsável aceita ids de config de outra empresa e sem checar que `$offboardingMember` pertence à company. Ex.: config da automação definido com responsible_id que a UI não filtra. Notificação contém o botão com link/contexto do desligamento da empresa do membro: é o próprio produto? Se o config for corrompido, o dado sai da empresa. Além disso: se o `responsible` pertence à outra empresa, o link é da empresa 'errada' (a URL de membro da empresa do desligado), e pessoa de outra empresa recebe orientação sobre processo interno.
→ code_search `responsible_id` / `responsibleId` no escopo de action configs automations para ver onde é setado.
→ confirmar se há validação.
6. [medium] — intOrNull em vrAlim/percAliment com decimais; usar decimal e conversão truncante eSocial. code_search entity `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` para vrAlim e percAliment. (pode também ser float; em caso de int…)
7. [medium] — migration semear para todas empresas: escala, tempo, ativação do produto para todos etc. Migration não filtrada por opt-in; não batelada/in-transaction. Possível impacto de massa (ex. 10k empresas) — muitas SELECT/INSERT; além de criar fluxo visível e desnecessário em empresas que não usam. Conforme user rules: documentação OK mas validar homologação. Sugerir filtro, ex.: apenas empresas com produto/plano que inclua offboarding e eSocial; basear fluxo em slug semanticamente definir: a action se recusa? O template de etapas criado com módulos esocial_s2299 true — para empresas com Esocial disabled (getEsocialMode null), a action retorna skip quando rodada — tudo bem, mas ela aparece.
→ code_search em "offboarding" Companies? Ferramentas sobre modelo de company has offboarding? Neste projeto provavelmente todos têm. Aceitável; manter medium.
Aliás a migration não é transacional; caso uma empresa falhe no meio, as anteriores estão inseridas; reexecutar preenche o resto. Isso é aceito. sem transação por causa DDL? aqui DDL não; a migration inteira de seed poderia rodar em transação. Mas os ensures.
8. [medium] — down() incompleta — sobra workflow criado e produto ativado (indistinguíveis). Para rollback em produção, deixar os workflow/products órfãos. Recomendar guardar ids em settings ou ao menos anotar na documentação; ou remover apenas templates é suficiente? Para reverter o seed integralmente, remover fluxo permanece. A descrição é mais precisa: "rollback removes only flow templates; workflows ['Fluxos de Saída'] and workflow products and activated products created by up() are not removed — orphan data; in environments where the workflow with slug was created by this migration, it remains."
→ Tool? Não precisa.
9. [low] — `$member->getSourceType() !== 'offboarding'` string mágica (deve usar constante) etc.; ou comments em inglês? — low style. Não é necessário. Melhor não inventar. Porém devo ter pelo menos um low? Não há obrigação. O output aceita 0 lows se nada. Melhor ter 0 lows do que fabricar.
Posso remover issue 8 de down incompleta para não estourar; mas é real. Manter como low? É mais uma questão de reversibilidade: user rules migrations pedem reversível quando possível. O `down()` deveria remover o que criou. É medium? Dados órfãos duplicados em devs/replay. A seed de workflows "Fluxos de Saída" como default=1 — down deixaria um workflow padrão default sem template... em rollback, o workflow criado é default=1 para a empresa que não tinha nenhum fluxo de saída? O insert da migration coloca is_default=1. Se depois revertida, a empresa fica com um workflow órfão marcado default sem template? O workflow de saída com slug fica lá e usado (certamente outros offboarding flows defaults? "offboarding" product uses workflows; all new workflows with slug 'fluxo-de-saida') → a empresa que não tinha recebeu um workflow 'fluxos de saída' default (slug fluxo-de-saida). Após rollback da migration, os templates são removidos mas o workflow permanece com produto de offboarding e default; qualquer outro seed futuro para offboarding procuraria slug? Uma nova versão do template de offboarding (por ex. v2) encontraria o workflow e usaria. Impacto moderado. Médio talvez.
Para manter razoável, vou transformar down/incompleta como parte do issue migration (7) sobre reversibilidade? Posso combinar itens de migration em um issue "migration cria seed para todas..." e um issue separado para down. Mas combiná-los sob um mesmo issue de migration é aceitável, para não inchar. A instrução cada issue descreve um risco e tool guidance. Posso juntar os riscos relacionados à migration em um issue? Hmm. No formato, issue deve descrever um ponto; pode listar as tool calls pertinentes. Mas para clareza, cada problema separado. Migração tem 2 problemas distintos:
- scope/massividade (impacto produção).
- reversão incompleta (down deixa dados órfãos).
Vou decidir: down incompleta é uma descoberta direta, sem tool, classificação low? É um problema de manutenção de migrations — afeta rollback. Muitos times não fazem rollback de seeds; o down tenta. Acho que a omissão do workflow na remoção pode não ser um problema porque o workflow pode ter sido criado por rodada anterior/sem seed e a migration não marca workflow. Não dá para saber se down deve apagar um workflow legítimo. Então omitir a remoção é uma escolha segura. Mas quando a migration criou o workflow, o down não o desfaz — fica dado órfão que a migration seed criou (produto global active, workflows). Isso viola a regra de idempotência/reversão, mas pode ser considerado aceitável já que down não deseja apagar workflows em uso (podem ter sido modificados/customizados). Aliás, na verdade, apagar templates customizados? Cada template seed criado pode ter sido modificado pelo usuário. `down()` deletes templates com seed mark — isso remove a customização de templates usados em offboardings? Espere: se o template foi usado para criar instâncias, as instâncias têm referências a flow_template_id — deletar o template pode quebrar histórico/instâncias (FK para flow_template? Se flow instance references template id com FK ON DELETE restrict, o delete falha). Isso. O down tenta deletar flow_templates que podem estar referenciados por instâncias de fluxo criadas a partir deles — Dependendo da FK — `flow_instances.flow_template_id`. Se houver instâncias criadas do template (mesmo em andamento), o DELETE falha; ou se CASCADE deleta instâncias — perda de dados do processo. No entidade "flow_templates" do produto flowable, as instâncias referenciam `flow_template_id`. A migration down não considera instâncias criadas. Em produção, depois de semanas, deletar template com instâncias pode apagar ou quebrar referências de offboardings em andamento. Um rollback de seed com dados gerados (instâncias) não deveria deletar templates usados. Vou incluí-lo no issue down com nuance.
Seria issue 8 médio: down remove templates mesmo se referenciados por instâncias e não remove workflows criados — reversão de prod com dados em uso pode perder/quebrar dados de instâncias.
→ code_search para coluna flow_template_id em flow_instances / FK. Confirma se existem referências. Em um plano de revisão, isso é uma checagem apropriada.
Vou manter.
**Issue da leitura inicial `findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember`** — checar existência. Coloco como um "medium" com actions de verificação? Talvez de baixa confiança; mas o fato de não estar no diff pode ser um método pré-existente. Para revisão, seria tool call para ver. Não é issue se existir; a issue precisa descrever algo confirmável? Rules: antes de fazer claim não-local verify using file_read/code_search. Um plano de revisão pode antecipar. No formato, cada issue é um ponto de risco provável. Posso incluir uma issue de "risco" com verificação → a tool que comprova. Vou confirmar: o template da nova feature é referenciado em methods chamados na nova função: `findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember`, `buildEsocialS2299ReviewUrl`, `resolveEsocialS2299Responsible`, `getDismissalDate`, `getRequestedAt` etc. E o `file` de origem é o arquivo alterado, portanto essas funções precisam existir; na classe toda há muitos métodos privados. Métodos `dateOrNull`, `stringOrNull`, `intOrNull`, `booleanStringOrNull`, `cpfOrNull`, `onlyDigits` são adicionados nesta PR no fim.
Nota: possibilidade de conflito de nomes: `stringOrNull`/`dateOrNull`/`intOrNull` já existirem na classe? Se já existirem com assinatura diferente, redeclaração fatal na carga da classe. No diff são methods adicionados... Se outros métodos com o mesmo nome já existem, ocorreria redeclaration error. Auto review teria pego. mas certa possibilidade. Verificar com code_search por nomes dos métodos adicionados antes do diff. Em um arquivo de 14k linhas, editar, métodos parecidos para outras actions eSocial não existem? Podemos procurar "function stringOrNull" no service. Vou incluir essa verificação em algum issue? Pode ser parte da validação geral.
Melhor planejar uma issue "verificar que os novos métodos utilitários/privados referenciados não conflitam/duplicam helpers que já existem na classe (ex.: parse de CPF/data) e que `findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember` existe" — natureza: se não existir, action sempre retorna erro; se duplicar, PHP fatal. Severidade alta se confirmado, mas sem confirmação é improvável. Vou marcá-la como medium com tool calls e explicação "por que importa".
Bem, mas tenho que lembrar formato do output: cada issue tem `→ tool(arg) — rationale` para cada chamada planejada.
Tool invocation examples: para code_search: `→ code_search search_text: "function findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember" file_patterns: ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"] — ...`
Não há formato estrito das tool args: usar `code_search(...)`. O exemplo mostra "file_read internal/agent/agent.go"... Posso descrever `→ code_search "function findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember" em src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php — verificar se o método referenciado existe...`. Simples.
Lembrar: A saída sempre em pt-BR. Summary descritivo. Issues numerados. Severidades [high].
Vamos refinar os high:
**Issue 1**: A seleção do evento S-2299 mais recente por trabalhador não associa o evento a este processo específico de offboarding. O que acontece:
- Se esse colaborador já tem um evento S-2299 do desligamento anterior que foi oficializado, a automação entende `existing_not_editable` e não cria nem atualiza nada — o rascunho do novo desligamento nunca é materializado como evento (fica só metadata, com eventId null). Em readmissões (comuns), a feature de "preparar S-2299 na etapa final" falha silenciosamente no segundo ciclo.
- Se houver um evento `pendente` órfão de outro processo (offboarding cancelado, rascunho manual), a automação reusa e sobrescreve ele, misturando contexto.
Location: `findLatestEsocialS2299Event`, chamada em executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft.
Impact: obrigação legal/eSocial incorreta; ausência de draft; possível retificação indevida.
Tools:
- code_search no repositório de EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento e usos para entender quantos eventos por trabalhador e como a tela atual separa novos desligamentos (search: `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento`).
- code_search `status.*pendente|esocial.*send|transmitir.*2299|S2299.*transmit` para ver se "pendente" inicia transmissão automática.
- code_search na UI/controller de desligamentos para como o sistema normalmente cria eventos de desligamento quando existem eventos anteriores (search em `src/Controller` por `S2299`).
**Issue 2**: Sobrescrita de evento pendente — escrever campos nullos.
No diff de `applyEsocialS2299Payload`, todas as chamadas usam valor `?? null` e os métodos stringOrNull('') → null; dateOrNull('') → null etc. payload default, campos vazios. Uma automação seed (Etapa final) não traz config com motivo e outras informações. Assim, qualquer evento pendente pré-existente (criado manualmente pelo RH na revisão) é reescrito com campos null ao novo disparo (nova mudança de etapa) — perda de dados preenchidos na tela de revisão do eSocial. A "checagem de existência" `status !== 'pendente'` não basta; é preciso, quando o evento pendente já existe, não sobrescrever (ou apenas preencher campos antes não preenchidos) — merge.
Localização: branch `elseif ($latestEvent instanceof ... && status === 'pendente')` → `applyEsocialS2299Payload`.
Impacto: Dados de desligamento eSocial apagados/zerados silenciosamente; retificação manual perdida.
Tools:
- code_search `setStatus('pendente')` e métodos na entidade para saber fluxo de edição manual e se as telas member_guides... (motivo) salvam neste evento.
- verificar em controller... `my_company_member_manage` e Esocial controller: `src/Controller` patterns.
**Issue 3 (medium, god object)**: conforme regra usuário, sinalizar service God Object, lógica duplicada. AutomationExecutionService já enorme (diff contexto linha ~14k/22k?), com muitas rotas de automação. A PR adiciona >300 linhas incluindo helpers de conversão genérica e montagem de payload eSocial dentro do service com várias vezes persist+flush e notificação elaborada; regra de construção de payload S-2299/CPF/datas e notificação deve ser extraída para serviço dedicado antes de continuar duplicando. Ex.: `OffboardingToRecruitment` externo bem centralizado.
→ code_search tamanho e padrão? talvez não; descrever.
**Issue 4 (medium)**: Sem transação e múltiplos flush; estado parcial e lixo em falhas. Três flush:
1. persist event (se criado) + member; flush.
2. resolve id do evento, set metadata, flush again.
Se exception entre eles (ex. notificação lança), op. retorna falso, mas um evento S-2299 'pendente' — que o usuário pode não ter revisado e que servirá de base para o fluxo — fica persistido. Não precisa ser rollback se evento continua coerente, mas eventId null na metadata etc. + sync. Melhor: build-all, single flush, transaction.
→ code_search patterns `beginTransaction` no service e outros services de eSocial.
**Issue 5 (medium)**: dados de outra empresa no reponsável/notificação. `resolveEsocialS2299Responsible` usa `find($id)` sem filtrar company; então se o config da automação tiver "responsible_id" de outra empresa (config antiga/migrada/erro de merge), a notificação de um desligamento (com dados pessoais e link interno da empresa) chega a pessoa de outra empresa. Do mesmo modo, não valida se o companyMember pertence a `$company` do fluxo. Deve-se validar pertencimento à company antes de enviar.
→ code_search origem do config/validation para `responsible_id` em automações S-2299 (procure campos "responsible_id" em twig templates de automation_config, ou em JS config schema: config de actions de automação).
→ code_search `offboarding.*responsible` na UI.
Talvez medium.
**Issue 6**: intOrNull decimal — vrAlim/percAliment (valores monetários/ percentuais) convertidos por `intOrNull`, truncando parte decimal. Lugar: applyEsocialS2299Payload linhas 14xxx: setVrAlim(intOrNull(...)); setPercAliment.
→ code_search na entidade EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento por declarações vrAlim/percAliment (tipos) e colunas migration para conferir se valor é int. Se a coluna for decimal/numeric/varchar — problema.
Também `setIndRemun` → intOrNull ok.
Vou classificar low se colunas forem int. Vamos manter medium e verificar.
**Issue 7 (medium migration)**: Seed global, escala e visibilidade a todas empresas; `FOR UPDATE`? Nada.
A migration, ao iterar todas companies, insere para cada uma:
- 1 workflow (se não existir por slug) (default 1),
- 1 produto "Offboarding" ativado globalmente na primeira empresa...
Wait: `ensureProduct` ativa global — a primeira condição UPDATE products SET active=1, mas name caso vazio — para todas apenas uma vez (id único). Produto offboarding já deveria existir.
- 1 template com settings modules offboarding/esocial_s2299 e cópias...
- 3 estágios+3 atividades+... 5 automações.
Como é seed new em Produção com 1000+ empresas, pode levar segundos/minutos e travar o deploy e a base com lock de linha. E impacto de produto nos tenants desavisados: todo tenant ganha template do fluxo `Offboarding com eSocial (S-2299)` visível na listagem de fluxos customizados e o Workflow de saída é marcado default 1.
Pergunta de produto: deveria propagar apenas para empresas com MÓDULO esocial/offboarding habilitado. Recomendo: batelada/conditional (não tudo de uma vez) e checagens; executar em janela.
→ code_search em model Company/flow: como se determina acesso a offboarding/eSocial (campo `esocialMode`), e consultar se `company` tem coluna para isso; adaptar filtro.
→ Estimar escala? Não posso rodar SQL, mas ver se existe enum.
**Issue 8 (medium)**: down() removal perigoso: apaga templates mesmo quando já existem instâncias/fluxos rodando baseados neles (perda de histórico) e não remove workflows/workflow_products criados (órfãos). Para rollback de migration de seed após uso, esses DELETE podem quebrar FKs de instâncias. Considerar rollback apenas em bancos sem uso, ou desativar em vez de remover.
→ code_search na entidade FlowTemplate/FlowInstance para ver relação flow_templates → flow_instances e constraint.
→ code_search de delete flows templates padrão em migrations anteriores que façam downs safe para referência.
**Issue 9**: Talvez não incluir — resolver issue de "findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember"? A issue do "método chamado não existe"? Isso é simples verificação. Não posso ter como issue sem verificação, mas o formato do code review plan permite tools calls para confirmar antes de concluir. A issue indica risco: "confirmar que método findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember existe; se não existir, a automação falha sempre com exceção capturada — resultaria em sucesso falso (success false)". Vou adicionar uma issue medium/baixa com tool. Mas para evitar que o plano pareça com achado não verificado, posso absorver no issue 3 ou separar com "verificar" como baixa. Vamos fazer uma issue de low? `code_search` para `function findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember` e metodos/helpers novos p/ detectar redeclaração. Se a regra diz "no non-local claim before verifying", num plano de revisão está tudo bem em colocar o passo de verificação na arrow. Descrever como low/�1? Na verdade é mais checagem do que problema — ainda um possível bug (método ausente). Mas precisa existir para passar testes manuais. Vou assumir existe, não issue.
`findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember` deve existir porque "findOffboardingMember..." já existia? Não está referenciado no diff além. Não incluir para não inventar; pode adicionar uma tool call de verificação genérica na issue 4? Talvez não.
**Issue 9 low**: `getSourceType() !== 'offboarding'` literal — mas em outros pulos você nota que há constantes para source type? Não sei. Vou olhar o diff: PayrollClosingBpmnService::SOURCE_TYPE; para offboarding, existe alguma OffboardingBpmnService com SOURCE_TYPE = 'offboarding'? Provavelmente o source type offboarding em vários locais via `OffboardingBpmnService::SOURCE_TYPE`... Usar constante evitaria typo. Caso exista, issue low. Mas não sei. Não vamos incluir.
**Nota**: no trecho do diff do automation (linha 504), action key é `create_esocial_s2299_draft`. Está no match? Inserido dentro de um array map 'action_type' => method get... Na verdade o código de dispatch é tipo um array grande `switch`? O diff mostra:
```
'advance_rule' => $this->executeAdvanceToNextStage(...),
// ✅ Criar Processo Seletivo ...
'create_processo_seletivo' => $this->executeCreateProcessoSeletivo(...),
'create_esocial_s2299_draft' => $this->executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft(...),
```
Trata-se de um array associativo com callables? Se for um match/switch, não. Parece um "action dispatchers mapping" retornando resultado da execução. OK.
Cuidado: o array contém evaluates de TODAS as chaves/elementos — se o array estiver construído avaliando as chamadas, ele executaria todos handlers. Não; provavelmente dentro de um método `handleAction` com `match`. O diff não mostra wrapper. Se os elementos fossem valores avaliados, executaria todas as ações invocando métodos desnecessários e causando efeitos. Isso seria um problema sério... Mas código que funciona já usa esse padrão com `create_processo_seletivo`. Não vou especular.
Eu deveria incluir uma verificação de mecanica: visualizar o trecho de código onde está o array para confirmar que é um switch/match lazy, não um array avaliado cujas chamadas rodam todas. Não preciso marcar issue? Talvez um tool call em alguma issue geral? Não.
Vamos agora redigir.
Precisamos "Summary" curto, e "Issues" com items.
No fim devemos ainda ter o plano revisado para não violar requisitos: "Each part carries exactly one piece of information" etc.
Feito isso: Output:
Summary: A PR adiciona...
Issues
1. [high] (descrição...)
→ code_search ... — ...
→ code_search ... — ...
Preciso ser conciso mas com análise útil nas descriptions. Em português. Descrever local, problema, impacto (3 dimensões), e sugestão. Ter 3 a 9 issues plausíveis.
Vou detalhar as descrições com estrutura:
1. "No handler `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, a busca pelo evento S-2299 (`findLatestEsocialS2299Event`) considera apenas o trabalhador, sem amarrar o evento ao offboarding/processo atual. ..."
Explicação. A numeração por severidade. Tool calls.
2. "Na atualização de evento pendente existente, o payload construído a partir do config da automação (vazio no seed) é aplicado com `applyEsocialS2299Payload` e zera todos os campos..." description.
Ferramentas.
3. "`AutomationExecutionService`, service gigante ..." (medium).
4. "Várias persistências sem transação..."
5. "Resolução do responsável sem validação de empresa (responsible_id pode ser de outra empresa)..."
6. "Conversão decimais com intOrNull..."
7. "Migration aplica seed para todas as empresas ..."
8. "down() da migration: apaga templates possivelmente em uso e não remove workflows criados ..."
Podemos incluir um non-issue do template YAML? Nada.
Considere que "god object" deve vir antes no texto seguindo a regra "sinalize antes de qualquer outro achado"? O regra diz "Sinalize isso antes de qualquer outro achado" (prioridade). Para respeitá-la, devo ordenar os issues de forma que o god object seja issue 1, mesmo sendo medium? Isso contradiz a definição de severidade do system prompt: ordenar por severidade e a definição diz médio para maintainability. However, o output vence? Requirements do output do System Prompt: "Ordering: Issues must be numbered continuously and sorted by severity in descending order (high → medium → low)". Então high vêm primeiro. Não posso colocar god object como issue 1 se há highs. O System Prompt prevalece. Posso colocar god object como primeiro medium (issue 3). Isso a re-regra diz "antes de qualquer outro achado" — como diretriz de prioridade da análise (peso mental), não do output. Mantemos: highs primeiro, depois god object como primeiro medium.
Se eu questionar severidade do god object: Could classify as high? Não se encaixa: não causa falha crítica nem perda de dados direta; pode causar. Regra dos usuários chama "maior peso" — mas definir alto apenas com base em preferência arquitetural não é justo. Utilizarei medium (manutenção).
Agora, os argumentos "→" specific tool invocation syntax. O instruction diz apenas descrever em uma linha: ferramenta + argumentos + propósito após travessão.
Então:
→ code_search "EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento" em ["src/", "src/Repository/", "src/Controller/"] — Confirmar o ciclo de vida/cardinalidade dos eventos por trabalhador e como a tela de desligamento lida com múltiplos S-2299.
Mas code_search precisa file_patterns; exemplo format: `code_search search_text: "...", file_patterns: [...]`.
Nenhuma exigência forte. O texto plain deve guiar.
Vamos escrever.
Severidade escolhida para 1 e 2 high.
Reconsider: Issue 1 e 2 são parcialmente sobrepostos — mas diferentes: 1 é ausência de criação de um novo evento no cenário readmissão; 2 é apagamento de preenchimento/identidade. Ambos partem do mesmo trecho. OK.
Para esses dois, preciso contextos de verificação:
- `code_search search_text "EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento" file_patterns ["src/"]` — ver usos e entender ciclo (se a entidade é usada tanto para rascunho como para transmitir; status; atributos).
- `code_search "function findLatestEsocialS2299Event|status.*pendente"` — onde eventos 'pendente' são consumidos (fila/envio), ou se "pendente" é só status de rascunho; arquivo alvo já no diff.
- `code_search "my_company_member_manage" "esocialTab"` — onde a tela de revisão edita o evento para confirmar manual edits.
Não posso chamar tools, eles são planejamentos, okay.
Para migration: code_search na entidade Company/Offboarding determinando "como identificar empresas habilitadas para offboarding/eSocial". Sugestão: `code_search "esocialMode" file_patterns ["src/Entity/Company.php", "src/Service/"]`. E para instâncias/template FK: code_search "flow_template_id" "src/Entity/FlowInstance*".
Para issue 5 (responsável de outra empresa): code_search "responsible_id" em templates decision_system automations para saber origem e validação, e "resolveEsocialS2299Responsible" não global. Utilizarei:
`→ code_search "responsible_id" file_patterns ["templates/decision_system/automations/", "src/"] — ...`
`→ code_search "function executeNotify|recipient.*company" ...`?
Para `intOrNull`, code_search "vrAlim|percAliment" "src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php" para o tipo da coluna/setter.
Para `AutomationExecutionService` god object usarei tool arg para documentar linha count? Não é necessário. Direto: classe com mais de 14 mil linhas mesmo trecho (ln 14924 vs ln 14920) → arquivo é ~22+ mil linhas. Já é evidência.
Issue with no tools per description should be omitted. Migration down may have code_search para confirmar FKs em flow instance.
Vamos definir a lista final (9 issues):
1. [high] falha contextual + readmissão.
2. [high] sobrescrita de rascunho pendente (perda de dados).
3. [medium] god object.
4. [medium] sem transação/flushes parciais.
5. [medium] responsible cross-company.
6. [medium] intOrNull decimais em vrAlim/percAliment.
7. [medium] seed global/massiva para todas as empresas.
8. [medium] down deleta templates referenciados/não remove workflow criado.
Nenhum low? Caso queira um low sobre os valores espelhados em templates (lista label `flow_detail` + `list_automations`) manutenção dupla — mas essas mudanças são acréscimos de mapeamentos duplicados que seguem padrão existente; não puxar.
Outro possível low: em `motivo_desligamento.html.twig`, se `prevEvts` inteiro for null, Twig error. Mas linha não resolveu. Vou não.
Distribui tools:
Issue1 tools:
- `code_search search_text:"EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento" file_patterns:["src/Repository/", "src/Service/"]` — mapear consultas existentes por trabalhador e ciclo.
- `code_search search_text:"S2299" file_patterns:["src/", ":(exclude)src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"]` — ver se há mais lugares que criam/enviam S-2299 e tratam readmissão.
Issue2 tools:
- `code_search search_text:"function executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft|applyEsocialS2299Payload" file_patterns:["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"]` — localizar linhas (introspecção).
- `code_search "setStatus" file_patterns ["src/"] de EsocialS2299 — procurar quando um evento pendente é editado manualmente e depois transmitido.
Ok posso encurtar o número de tool calls — não é obrigatório múltiplas por issue. Mas descrever 1-2 é suficiente.
Vamos montar o texto final com cuidado para não exceder 2000 tokens? O output pode ser longo? Não há limitação apertada mas objetivo, diria que 900-1600 palavras é ok. As traduções devem estar em pt-BR. Vamos deixar claro o descritivo.
Vou escrever com precisão e clareza.
A formatação estrita:
- "Summary: ..." e depois tudo em Issues com "1. [high] ..."
- Não adicionar blocos de código nem cabeçalhos.
Cannot use Markdown "#". Fine.
Estrutura textual final:
Summary: A alteração adiciona a automação ... (1-2 frases).
Issues
1. [high] No handler `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, adicionado em `AutomationExecutionService`, o rascunho/evento do S-2299 é buscado apenas pelo trabalhador (`findLatestEsocialS2299Event`...). Problema: ... Impacto... A correção deve ... Para confirmar o ciclo de vida e ver se há outro fluxo que trate readmissões, recomendo as buscas:
→ code_search ...
→ code_search ...
2. [high] ...
Será que preciso manter exatamente "Issues" e número depois? O system prompt output:
Summary: ...
Issues
1. [...]
Não tenho seção para "issues"? O modelo: Summary line, depois "Issues" label e lista. Em exemplos do system prompt de output, usamos "Issues" e itens. Vou seguir. Plain, sem ```.
Vou escrever.
Summary: A PR adiciona uma automação `create_esocial_s2299_draft` para offboarding: novo handler em `AutomationExecutionService` que localiza o colaborador do offboarding, cria/atualiza o evento S-2299 (ou apenas registra o payload em `sourceMetadata` quando faltam dados) e notifica o responsável como remetente de sistema (Adriana); inclui o YAML da ação, a migration de seed do fluxo padrão “Offboarding com eSocial (S-2299)” para todas as empresas, ajustes de rótulos nos templates e correção de condicional no guia de motivo de desligamento.
Issues
1. [high] No novo handler `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` (em `AutomationExecutionService`), o evento S-2299 é localizado apenas pelo trabalhador (`findLatestEsocialS2299Event`), sem vínculo com o offboarding/processo atual. Na prática, se o colaborador já teve um desligamento anterior oficializado (readmissão), o evento mais recente terá status diferente de `pendente`, e o rascunho do novo desligamento nunca será criado como evento — fica só em metadata, com `eventId` nulo, e a notificação ainda diz que o rascunho foi criado. Se houver um evento `pendente` órfão de outro processo/offboarding cancelado, o código reutiliza e sobrescreve esse evento com dados do processo novo, misturando contextos. Isso pode gerar obrigação eSocial incorreta ou ausente sem alerta claro. É preciso amarrar a busca ao contexto (ex.: último evento pendente criado por este offboarding, ou filtrar por vínculo/empresa/datas) e criar um novo evento quando o desligamento atual for distinto do já registrado.
→ code_search "EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento" em ["src/Repository/", "src/Service/"] — verificar como os demais fluxos de eSocial consultam/criam eventos por trabalhador e qual a cardinalidade esperada
→ code_search "S2299|s2299" em ["src/", ":(exclude)src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"] — confirmar se existe outro fluxo que trata desligamentos repetidos/readmissões e como a tela distingue novo desligamento
2. [high] Quando o evento mais recente está `pendente`, o código aplica `applyEsocialS2299Payload` reescrevendo todos os campos com base no config da automação — e o payload padrão (inclusive o do template semeado na migration) tem todos os campos vazios. Como `stringOrNull`, `dateOrNull`, `intOrNull` convertem vazio em `null`, uma nova execução da automação (ex.: colaborador sai e volta à etapa final, ou trigger rodado de novo) zera silenciosamente campos já preenchidos manualmente pelo responsável na revisão do rascunho, como motivo do desligamento e datas. O correto seria, para evento pendente já existente, fazer merge apenas dos campos não preenchidos ou não alterar o evento, preservando o trabalho de revisão.
→ code_search "setMtvDeslig|setDtDeslig|setStatus" em ["src/"] — localizar onde o rascunho pendente é editado manualmente/transmitido para confirmar que o usuário preenche a mesma entidade que a automação sobrescreve
→ code_search "StatusPending|status.*pendente|EsocialS2299" em ["src/Service/", "src/Controller/"] — ver o ciclo do status e se uma nova rodada da automação pode ocorrer depois da edição manual
3. [medium] O `AutomationExecutionService` já é um service gigante (o próprio diff mostra métodos na faixa da linha ~14.900 a ~15.200) e a PR adiciona mais de 330 linhas de regra de eSocial dentro dele — montagem de payload, conversões de CPF/data/booleanos, resolução de responsável e notificação. Esse padrão de crescimento concentra consulta + regra de negócio + persistência + notificação no mesmo lugar e já vem sendo estendido a cada automação nova; antes de incluir mais lógica de desligamento eSocial, convém extrair um serviço dedicado (ex.: `EsocialS2299DraftService`) reutilizando os utilitários de conversão existentes, como já é feito com `OffboardingToRecruitment`.
→ code_search "class AutomationExecutionService" em ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"] — confirmar o tamanho total da classe e a quantidade de responsabilidades acumuladas para justificar a extração
4. [medium] A execução do novo handler faz múltiplos `persist()`/`flush()` sem transação: primeiro grava evento e metadata, depois faz um segundo `flush()` para registrar o `eventId` na metadata, e só então envia a notificação. Se algo falhar entre esses pontos (ex.: exceção na notificação ou no segundo flush), o método retorna `success: false`, mas o evento S-2299 já pode ter sido criado/atualizado com status `pendente` e a metadata pode ficar com `eventId` nulo ou desatualizada. Em ambiente com retry ausente ou pontual, isso deixa rascunho órfão e estado inconsistente entre evento, metadata e notificação. O handler deveria rodar em uma transação única (construir tudo, um único flush) para tornar a operação atômica ou documentar explicitamente a estratégia de retry.
→ code_search "beginTransaction|commit|rollBack" em ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "src/Service/"] — comparar com o padrão usado por outros handlers de automação que persistem eventos eSocial
5. [medium] Em `resolveEsocialS2299Responsible`, o responsável é resolvido a partir de `responsible_id`/`responsibleId`/`company_member_id`/`member_id` do config com `find((int) $configuredId)`, sem validar que esse `CompanyMembers` pertence à mesma empresa do fluxo/colaborador. Um config de automação com ID de pessoa de outra empresa (erro de configuração, merge, migração de template entre empresas) faria a notificação de desligamento — com dados pessoais do colaborador e link interno — ir para alguém fora da empresa correta. O mesmo vale para o `$companyMember` do offboarding: não há confirmação de que ele pertence à `$company` do flow instance. É recomendável validar o vínculo com a empresa antes de montar payload/notificação ou ignorar IDs “estrangeiros” e cair no fallback.
→ code_search "responsible_id|responsibleId" em ["templates/decision_system/", "src/"] — ver de onde vêm esses campos de config e se a UI/controller valida a empresa antes de salvar
→ code_search "getCompany\(\).*getId|company_member_id" em ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"] — confirmar se há checagem de empresa nos demais envios de notificação por `company_member_id`
6. [medium] Em `applyEsocialS2299Payload`, os campos `vrAlim` e `percAliment` são convertidos com `intOrNull`, que trunca qualquer parte decimal. Para valores de pensão alimentícia isso pode representar perda de centavos/percentual (ex.: “1234.56” vira `1234`, “30.5%” vira `30`), gerando rascunho com valor divergente do config e, se transmitido, obrigação eSocial incorreta. É preciso confirmar o tipo esperado das colunas/setters (`int` vs. `decimal`/`float`) e, se for o caso, usar conversão decimal preservando as casas, além de validar intervalo/valor na entrada.
→ code_search "vrAlim|percAliment" em ["src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php", "migrations/"] — verificar o tipo declarado da coluna/propriedade para confirmar se a conversão com `intOrNull` perde precisão
7. [medium] A migration `Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate` itera por todas as empresas (`SELECT id FROM company`) e, para cada uma, garante produto ativo, workflow padrão, template e 3 estágios com atividades/automações. Isso propaga o fluxo “Offboarding com eSocial (S-2299)” inclusive para empresas que não usam offboarding ou não têm eSocial habilitado, além de gerar muitas queries/escritas em produção (risco de lentidão/travamento do deploy em bases grandes). Vale avaliar se o seed deve ser filtrado por empresas com o produto/módulos habilitados (e rodar em lotes) e confirmar com o produto que a exposição do template para todos os tenants é intencional.
→ code_search "esocialMode|offboarding" em ["src/Entity/Company.php", "src/Service/"] — identificar como o sistema determina se a empresa usa offboarding/eSocial para restringir o seed
→ code_search "flow_templates" em ["migrations/"] — comparar com migrations de seed anteriores que já propagaram templates por empresa para seguir o mesmo padrão de filtro/execução
8. [medium] O `down()` da migration remove os templates semeado mesmo quando já existem instâncias de fluxo/offboardings criados a partir deles — dependendo das constraints, o `DELETE` pode falhar ou, com cascata, apagar histórico/processos em andamento — e não remove os `workflows`/`workflow_products` criados pelo `up()` (nem reverte o `active = 1` do produto), deixando dados órfãos após o rollback. Como o seed é para produção e os templates ficam customizáveis, o rollback deveria apenas desativar/marcar como não-seed (ou ser documentado como irreversível após uso), e não apagar registros possivelmente referenciados.
→ code_search "flow_template_id|flow_template" em ["src/Entity/FlowInstance*.php", "src/Repository/"] — verificar se instâncias de fluxo referenciam o template com FK e se um delete afetaria processos já criados
→ code_search "is_default|slug.*fluxo-de-saida" em ["src/", "migrations/"] — confirmar quais outros pontos dependem do workflow “Fluxos de Saída” criado pelo seed
main_task
Request #1
deepseek-v4-flash
P:24.98K C:3.21K CR:2.69K CW:0
24733ms
Reasoning
Let me start by understanding the code changes. I'll review each file in the review_files list.
Let me analyze the files:
1. `config/automations/offboarding.yaml` - adds a new automation action definition
2. `migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php` - new migration seeding flow templates for all companies
3. `src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php` - adds new action handler `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` and related helpers, plus a change in notification logic (`system_sender`)
4. `templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig` - fixes a null check
5. `templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig` - adds label
6. `templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig` - adds label
Let me investigate the suspicious code by reading context.
Let me start by verifying a few things via code_search and file_read.
Key things to verify:
1. The `findLatestEsocialS2299Event` finds by trabalhador only, no offboarding context. Need to check cardinality of events per worker.
2. The event overwrite when `pendente`.
3. The notification message includes `{{member_name}}` template - need to check how member_name resolves in the notify context. They pass member_id as companyMember. Actually, `executeNotify` is invoked with the automation's `$member` being the FlowInstanceMember; the merge context passes member_id => companyMember id. Let me check how `member_name` placeholder is resolved. Actually the flow might render member_name from the notify context.
Let me look at the diff in `executeNotify` around line 7039 - `system_sender` added to email config. And the change around 13903-13926 for `$isSystemSender`.
Let me check a few things:
- In the notify call, the responsible is passed via 'to' => 'company_member', 'company_member_id'. Also there's a `system_sender => true`. But wait, at line ~13906, the condition for system sender: `$isSystemSender = filter_var($config['system_sender'] ?? false, FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN) || ...`. But the `$config` inside `executeNotify` at that location — is it the raw config passed? The handler calls `$this->executeNotify([...], $member, array_merge($context, [...]))`. So the config is the array built. `system_sender` true will be passed. Good.
- However, the message says "Abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar os detalhes." and it's sent with system_sender, so the notification goes into assistant conversation. Fine.
Now potential bug #1: event locating by trabalhador only. Need to confirm cardinality of `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` per trabalhador. Typically eSocial events are per worker; readmission is a new S-2299 after a new S-2200. A worker could have multiple S-2299 events over time (multiple terms). So finding latest by id DESC could pick a prior term's event that was transmitted (status != pendente). Then `existing_not_editable` and it just stores metadata with no event. That means the draft for the current offboarding won't be created as event - but that's arguably "missing" state; not creating wrong data. Wait, but the message would say "já existe evento oficial não editável para este trabalhador". Hmm, but this check picks only the latest event. If latest is transmitted, it won't create. But the requirement says automation idempotent and shouldn't duplicate events. But there could be a legitimately new dismissal after a rehire. Let me consider.
Actually let me look at where the code elsewhere handles S-2299 creation to see cardinality. Let me search.
Potential bug #2: overwriting pending events. When pending exists and automation runs again, it overwrites all fields from config (mostly empty), clearing any manual edits. Since config default has all empty. That would wipe manual entries made by responsible while reviewing the draft. This is a real concern.
Wait—but does the automation run again after the event was created in the same stage-enter? The member enters the final stage once typically. But automation could be triggered again if re-entering stage (e.g., moved back then forward). Or if the user configured trigger days_in_stage? In the YAML it's allowed_triggers employee_enters_stage only. But migration seeds `on_enter` trigger. The blocked_triggers list in yaml includes others. The handler is also invoked from UI config maybe multiple stage entries. So yes possible.
Also, careful: overwrite pending with data from payload that could contain `''` for motivo which then set null. Actually config from automation action would have keys with empty strings. So applying to a pending event clears motivo and dates. That's a real data loss issue.
Bug: when status !== 'pendente' existing event: eventStatus='existing_not_editable'. But then metadata still records eventId and the message says "já existe evento oficial não editável para este trabalhador". But it might be a previous term's official event and this new offboarding needs a new draft. Should probably create a new event. But given only pending one exists normally... hard to confirm. Let me search the repository for how the S-2299 is handled elsewhere.
Let me also look at notification: `$this->executeNotify([... 'message' => 'O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado ...')`. Where does member_name come from? The automation member is FlowInstanceMember; they merge `member_id` to companyMember. Need to confirm `member_name` resolves from the member in context or from the notification config. If the notify function resolves member_name from the context's member (FlowInstanceMember) - flow member might not have a name? Let me check.
Actually there may be subtle: the message says "foi criado" even in 'created' path where no event could be created due to missing data. But message semantics: "O rascunho do S-2299 de X foi criado a partir do offboarding." In the missing-data case (worker data missing) it still says the draft was created (only metadata payload). Well message from the return handles the distinction but notification message doesn't vary. Minor.
Now, YAML checks: Only spelling errors in yaml keys? The yaml is new automation action definition. Keys: `id`, `type`, `title`, `icon`, `has_config`, `allowed_triggers`, `blocked_triggers`, `blocked_trigger_message`, `description`, `config_preset`. Compare to others in the same file to make sure they match format used elsewhere (e.g., previous ones have `has_config: false`, allowed/blocked triggers). Should check consistency. Let me read file to compare the sibling entries.
Migration: many concerns:
- The up() checks each table existence and returns if missing—fine.
- Seeds for every company. Possibly intended given doc.
- `ensureStage` selects by name and product with product_slot_index IS NULL; potential duplicates if stage name collides with an existing stage with different order? It returns existing id if name match; could attach automations to wrong stage if the name collides in a pre-existing template? The template itself is ensured by seed_migration key. But if user deleted stages... Actually this template is uniquely identified by seed_migration setting, so within template id it's fine.
- But `ensureOffboardingStages` is only called for new templates (when template was just created)? Actually ensureTemplate returns existing templateId (if >0) without seeding stages, and up() calls ensureOffboardingStages for every company, even when template already existed from a previous partial run. That's fine because ensureStage/ensureActivity/ensureAutomation are idempotent (check by name).
- However, down() deletes all flow_templates matching the seed key including possibly customized ones. It deletes automations/activities/stages/template_products but leaves workflow_products and workflows and product active state. So orphan workflows remain. But the workflow is shared 'fluxo-de-saida' slug used by other flows possibly (default offboarding workflows?). Deleting template but keeping workflow is okay-ish. The big issue: if templates have instances referencing them, FK constraints may fail or cascade. Need to check if flow instance references flow_template. Search for flow_template_id column.
Wait—the flow instances likely reference `flow_template_id`. If there is FK and no cascade, DELETE will fail. If cascade, history deleted. Either way risk.
Actually, let me check entities: FlowInstance may have `flowTemplate` ManyToOne. Also the down() deletes templates but does not delete flow instances. If instances have FK to template with ON DELETE restrict → error. If ON DELETE SET NULL → maybe fine.
Also the deletion doesn't remove `flow_template_products` before `flow_templates`? It deletes template_products where flow_template_id = templateId then delete flow_templates. Yes.
But not deleting automations/activities/stages of other templates? Only within the template. Fine.
But there is a more important concern: `down()` deletes stages/activities/automations that might be referenced by flow instances (flow_instance stages reference template stage?). Possibly FK restrict.
Given rule "migration reversível quando possível", we can comment that down may break or leave orphans; recommend disabling rather than deleting.
Another migration concern: The `up()` runs `ensureWorkflowProduct` with order_index=0, but 'workflow_products' - ensureProduct sets active=1 for all companies even if product disabled intentionally.
Now check the second concern about the missing worker data: In the case where `$esocialTrabalhador` doesn't exist, missing includes esocial_worker_data; metadata stored with payload including eventStatus 'draft_only'. Then notification is sent claiming draft created. Fine.
Let me look at code for the `system_sender` in email config around 7039. That's part of a different method (probably a generic method to build email config). They added system_sender to `$emailConfig`. Need to see how the emailConfig uses it... But there could be an issue that they added `'system_sender' => $config['system_sender'] ?? null` inside the loop for emailConfig; fine.
Now the change at 13903-13926 in a method (probably executeNotify). Previously `$isPayrollSystemSender` required member instanceof FlowInstanceMember with sourceType payroll; now they also allow system_sender boolean in config. This is a behavior change but consistent with the PR scope.
Now, check that config['system_sender'] passed as true in notify to make message go to assistant conversation: The new handler calls executeNotify with config containing `'system_sender' => true`. Good.
Potential bug: In executeNotify config includes `to => company_member`, plus a `member_id` merged? Actually they call executeNotify with config array, and they pass `$context` merged with member_id etc. But within executeNotify at line 13906 the `$config['system_sender']` is the notification config. Fine.
Potential issue: the responsible resolved in `resolveEsocialS2299Responsible` can be the flow responsible (CompanyMembers), but notification uses 'to' => 'company_member' with company_member_id = responsible id, message to review. That seems ok.
Potential cross-company: The responsible config id not validated to belong to the same company. The flow template could be copied across companies via merge/copy features; if automation config contains company_member_id from a different company... but usually config is generated fresh. Could be minor/medium.
Now check `member_name` placeholder resolution inside notification. Let's find how member_name gets substituted: maybe through renderMessage using context member. Need to see function in that block. Possibly messages are rendered with `member_name` from a given member in context (FlowInstanceMember). Actually the new message references `{{member_name}}` of the offboarding employee, but the automation's `$member` is the FlowInstanceMember (of the flow member), not the employee. Let me check how other automation notifications resolve `{{member_name}}`. In context they merged member_id to companyMember id, so template context maybe resolves the member by member_id. We should verify.
Let me read executeNotify around lines 13900-13960 and the rendering logic to understand where member_name is derived.
Let me start reading files and searching.
Also check the twig fix for `prevEvts.termino`: The change `prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` → `prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab`. But does `prevEvts.termino` exist as an array? If missing key, referencing `prevEvts.termino` in Twig yields null and `and` short-circuits? In Twig, accessing undefined key of array returns null (with possible strict flag). So fine.
Now let me verify things with tools.
Plan:
1. Read portions of AutomationExecutionService around new handler and executeNotify.
2. Search EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento usage and its entity fields and setters types (percAliment etc).
3. Search migrations for seeds patterns.
4. Check for constraints on flow_templates delete (instances referencing).
5. Check the config yaml file near new entry for format consistency (allowed triggers etc.).
6. Check product/offboarding entity to confirm dismissalDate etc.
Let me run the searches in parallel.
Vou revisar os arquivos do grupo. Primeiro, vou buscar contexto sobre entidades, repositórios e padrões relacionados ao S-2299, além de conferir o formato do YAML e a estrutura de execução da automação.
Tool Calls (3)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "config/automations/offboarding.yaml", "start_line": 130, "end_line": 220}
Result
File: config/automations/offboarding.yaml (Total lines: 481) IS_TRUNCATED: false LINE_RANGE: 130-220 130| 131| # 2.1 Notificar preenchimento eSocial (somente se empresa tiver eSocial habilitado) 132| - id: "notify_esocial_worker_data" 133| type: "notify_esocial_worker_data" 134| title: "Notificar preenchimento de dados do trabalhador e remuneração (eSocial)" 135| icon: "fa-solid fa-id-card-clip" 136| has_config: false 137| config_preset: 138| to: "flow_responsible" 139| 140| # --------------------------------------------------------- 141| # ENVIO DE E-MAILS (SMTP) 142| # Template determinado automaticamente baseado em: trigger + destinatário 143| # Ex: offboarding-on_all_activities_complete-employee 144| # --------------------------------------------------------- 145| 146| # 3. Enviar e-mail para colaborador 147| - id: "send_email_employee" 148| type: "send_email" 149| title: "Enviar e-mail para colaborador" 150| icon: "fa-solid fa-envelope" 151| has_config: false 152| config_preset: 153| to: "employee" 154| 155| # 4. Enviar e-mail para responsável do fluxo 156| - id: "send_email_flow_responsible" 157| type: "send_email" 158| title: "Enviar e-mail para responsável do fluxo" 159| icon: "fa-solid fa-user-gear" 160| has_config: false 161| config_preset: 162| to: "flow_responsible" 163| 164| # --------------------------------------------------------- 165| # NOTIFICAÇÕES ADICIONAIS 166| # --------------------------------------------------------- 167| 168| - id: "send_whatsapp" 169| type: "send_whatsapp" 170| title: "Enviar WhatsApp para colaborador" 171| icon: "fa-brands fa-whatsapp" 172| has_config: false 173| 174| movement: 175| - id: "move_to_next_stage" 176| type: "stage_change" 177| title: "Mover para a próxima etapa" 178| icon: "fa-solid fa-arrow-right" 179| has_config: false 180| description: "Move o colaborador para a próxima etapa do offboarding." 181| 182| - id: "create_esocial_s2299_draft" 183| type: "create_esocial_s2299_draft" 184| title: "Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299)" 185| icon: "fa-solid fa-file-lines" 186| has_config: false 187| allowed_triggers: 188| - "employee_enters_stage" 189| blocked_triggers: 190| - "offboarding_completed" 191| - "exit_date" 192| - "deadline_reached" 193| - "all_activities_completed" 194| - "all_activities_completed_plus_days" 195| - "any_activity_completed" 196| - "days_in_stage" 197| - "days_after_offboarding_start" 198| blocked_trigger_message: "Esta ação só pode ser usada com o trigger 'Colaborador entrar nesta etapa'" 199| description: "Cria ou atualiza o rascunho do evento S-2299 com dados do offboarding e notifica o responsável para revisar o desligamento eSocial." 200| config_preset: 201| to: "flow_responsible" 202| 203| # --------------------------------------------------------- 204| # AÇÕES DE VISIBILIDADE E ACESSO 205| # --------------------------------------------------------- 206| 207| visibility: 208| # Ação disponível APENAS na primeira etapa (ou Etapa Intermediária em flows variáveis) 209| # Usada com trigger on_enter 210| - id: "delay_offboarding_visibility" 211| type: "delay_offboarding_visibility" 212| title: "Aguardar X dias para exibir offboarding ao colaborador" 213| icon: "fa-solid fa-eye-slash" 214| has_config: true 215| config_type: "dropdown" 216| config_label: "Dias para aguardar antes de exibir o offboarding" 217| allowed_triggers: 218| - "employee_enters_stage" 219| blocked_triggers: 220| - "offboarding_completed"
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento", "file_patterns": ["src/Repository/", "src/Service/", "src/Controller/"]}
Result
File: src/Controller/CompanyController.php
Match lines: 3
34|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
6373| } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $event->getEsocialTrabalhador() !== null) {
6818| 'EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento' => 'Desligamento',
File: src/Controller/CompanyMemberController.php
Match lines: 3
72|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
548| $event = $em->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)->saveEventS2299($esocialTrabalhador, $data, $company, $remuneracao);
766| $blockingS2299 = $em->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)->findOneBy([
File: src/Controller/EsocialEventsController.php
Match lines: 1
25|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
File: src/Repository/EsocialDadosTrabalhadorRepository.php
Match lines: 2
840| $s2299Events = $em->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
1062| $s2299Events = $em->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2298EvtReintegrRepository.php
Match lines: 2
7|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
123| ->from(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class, 'd')
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
Match lines: 15
5|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
12| * @extends ServiceEntityRepository<EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento>
14| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento|null find($id, $lockMode = null, $lockVersion = null)
15| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento|null findOneBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null)
16| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[] findAll()
17| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[] findBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null, $limit = null, $offset = null)
19|class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository extends ServiceEntityRepository
23| parent::__construct($registry, EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class);
30| public function add(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $entity, bool $flush = true): void
42| public function remove(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $entity, bool $flush = true): void
63| public function saveEventS2299($esocialDadosTrabalhador, $data, $company, $dadosRemuneracao): EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
65| $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
102| * @param int $eventId ID do evento (EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento)
268| // * @return EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[] Returns an array of EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento objects
285| public function findOneBySomeField($value): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 9
40|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
14984| if ($latestEvent instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $latestEvent->getStatus() !== 'pendente') {
14987| } elseif ($latestEvent instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
14992| $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
15035| if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
15057| 'message' => $event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable'
15146| private function findLatestEsocialS2299Event(EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
15149| ->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
15156| private function applyEsocialS2299Payload(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $event, array $payload): void
File: src/Service/FlowableServices/FlowableVariablesService.php
Match lines: 7
15168| * Template: EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento (S-2299 - Desligamento)
15174| * @param int $eventId ID do evento (EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento)
15179| $repository = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class);
18943| \App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class => ['s2299', 'Desligamento'],
19097| \App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class => ['s2299', 'Desligamento'],
19326| \App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class => ['s2299', 'Desligamento'],
19700| $s2299Repo = $em->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class);
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento"}
Result
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php Match lines: 1 11|class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento extends EsocialEvents File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php Match lines: 1 19|class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository extends ServiceEntityRepository
Request #2
deepseek-v4-flash
P:30.72K C:204 CR:28.16K CW:0
2277ms
Reasoning
Let me read the repository `saveEventS2299` and the entity `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento`, plus the CompanyMemberController around line 548-766 to understand normal flow (single event per worker, cardinality), and where `prevEvts` and esocialTab=desligamento are.
Vou ler o repositório do S-2299, a entidade e o controller para entender a cardinalidade dos eventos e o ciclo de status.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php"}
Result
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php (Total lines: 296)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-296
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Repository;
4|
5|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
6|use Doctrine\Bundle\DoctrineBundle\Repository\ServiceEntityRepository;
7|use Doctrine\ORM\OptimisticLockException;
8|use Doctrine\ORM\ORMException;
9|use Doctrine\Persistence\ManagerRegistry;
10|
11|/**
12| * @extends ServiceEntityRepository<EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento>
13| *
14| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento|null find($id, $lockMode = null, $lockVersion = null)
15| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento|null findOneBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null)
16| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[] findAll()
17| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[] findBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null, $limit = null, $offset = null)
18| */
19|class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository extends ServiceEntityRepository
20|{
21| public function __construct(ManagerRegistry $registry)
22| {
23| parent::__construct($registry, EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class);
24| }
25|
26| /**
27| * @throws ORMException
28| * @throws OptimisticLockException
29| */
30| public function add(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $entity, bool $flush = true): void
31| {
32| $this->_em->persist($entity);
33| if ($flush) {
34| $this->_em->flush();
35| }
36| }
37|
38| /**
39| * @throws ORMException
40| * @throws OptimisticLockException
41| */
42| public function remove(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $entity, bool $flush = true): void
43| {
44| $this->_em->remove($entity);
45| if ($flush) {
46| $this->_em->flush();
47| }
48| }
49|
50| function sanitizeCNPJ($cnpj) {
51| return preg_replace('/\D/', '', $cnpj);
52| }
53|
54| function sanitizeCPF($cpf) {
55| return preg_replace('/\D/', '', $cpf);
56| }
57|
58| private function buildDateOrNull(?string $date): ?\DateTime
59| {
60| return !empty($date) ? new \DateTime($date) : null;
61| }
62|
63| public function saveEventS2299($esocialDadosTrabalhador, $data, $company, $dadosRemuneracao): EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
64| {
65| $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
66| $event->setModo( 'INC');
67| $event->setCompany($company);
68| $event->setTpAmb($company->getEsocialMode() ?? '2');
69| $event->setTpInscTransmissor(1);
70| $event->setNrInscTransmissor($this->sanitizeCNPJ($company->getCnpj()));
71| $event->setEsocialTrabalhador($esocialDadosTrabalhador);
72| $event->setIndRetif(1);
73| $event->setStatus('pendente');
74| $event->setCreatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
75| $event->setMtvDeslig($data['motivoDesligamento'] ?? null);
76| $event->setDtDeslig($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataDesligamento']) ?? null);
77| $event->setDtAvPrv($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataConcessaoAviso']) ?? null);
78| $event->setIndPagtoApi($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N');
79| $event->setDtProjFimApi($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataTerminoAviso']) ?? null);
80| $event->setPensAlim($data['pensAlim'] ?? null);
81| $event->setPercAliment($data['percAliment'] ?? null);
82| $event->setVrAlim($data['vrAlim'] ?? null);
83| $event->setNrProcTrab($data['numeroProcesso'] ?? null);
84| $event->setIndPdv($data['indPdv'] ?? null);
85| $event->setCpfSubstituto($this->sanitizeCPF($data['cpfSubstituto']) ?? null);
86| $event->setDtNascto($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataNascimentoTitular']) ?? null);
87| $event->setNovoCpf($this->sanitizeCPF($data['novoCpfTrabalhador']) ?? null);
88| $event->setIndRemun($data['indRemun'] ?? null);
89| $event->setDtFimRemun($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dtFimRemun']) ?? null);
90| $event->setInsConsig($data['matriculaInstituicao'] ?? null);
91| $event->setNrContr($data['numeroContrato'] ?? null);
92| $event->setDadosRemuneracao($dadosRemuneracao);
93|
94| $this->add($event);
95|
96| return $event;
97| }
98|
99| /**
100| * Extrai todos os dados do evento S-2299 para formatação no FlowableVariablesService
101| *
102| * @param int $eventId ID do evento (EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento)
103| * @return array|null Dados estruturados do evento e relacionamentos, ou null se não encontrado
104| */
105| public function getFlowableDataForTemplate(int $eventId): ?array
106| {
107| $event = $this->find($eventId);
108|
109| if (!$event) {
110| return null;
111| }
112|
113| // Extrair dados principais do evento
114| $data = [
115| 'id' => $event->getId(),
116| 'mtvDeslig' => $event->getMtvDeslig(),
117| 'dtDeslig' => $event->getDtDeslig()?->format('Y-m-d'),
118| 'dtAvPrv' => $event->getDtAvPrv()?->format('Y-m-d'),
119| 'indPagtoApi' => $event->getIndPagtoApi(),
120| 'dtProjFimApi' => $event->getDtProjFimApi()?->format('Y-m-d'),
121| 'pensAlim' => $event->getPensAlim(),
122| 'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),
123| 'vrAlim' => $event->getVrAlim(),
124| 'nrProcTrab' => $event->getNrProcTrab(),
125| 'indPdv' => $event->getIndPdv(),
126| 'cpfSubstituto' => $event->getCpfSubstituto(),
127| 'dtNascto' => $event->getDtNascto()?->format('Y-m-d'),
128| 'novoCpf' => $event->getNovoCpf(),
129| 'indRemun' => $event->getIndRemun(),
130| 'dtFimRemun' => $event->getDtFimRemun()?->format('Y-m-d'),
131| 'insConsig' => $event->getInsConsig(),
132| 'nrContr' => $event->getNrContr(),
133| ];
134|
135| // Extrair dados da classe pai (EsocialEvents)
136| $data['modo'] = $event->getModo();
137| $data['tpAmb'] = $event->getTpAmb();
138| $data['uniqueEventId'] = $event->getUniqueEventId();
139| $data['tpInscTransmissor'] = $event->getTpInscTransmissor();
140| $data['nrInscTransmissor'] = $event->getNrInscTransmissor();
141| $data['iniValid'] = $event->getIniValid();
142| $data['fimValid'] = $event->getFimValid();
143| $data['indRetif'] = $event->getIndRetif();
144| $data['indApuracao'] = $event->getIndApuracao();
145| $data['perApur'] = $event->getPerApur()?->format('Y-m-d');
146| $data['indGuia'] = $event->getIndGuia();
147| $data['status'] = $event->getStatus();
148| $data['createdAt'] = $event->getCreatedAt()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s');
149| $data['updatedAt'] = $event->getUpdatedAt()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s');
150|
151| // Extrair dados da empresa
152| $company = $event->getCompany();
153| if ($company) {
154| $data['company'] = [
155| 'id' => $company->getId(),
156| 'name' => $company->getName(),
157| 'code' => $company->getCode(),
158| 'cnpj' => $company->getCnpj(),
159| ];
160| } else {
161| $data['company'] = null;
162| }
163|
164| // Extrair dados do trabalhador eSocial relacionado
165| $esocialTrabalhador = $event->getEsocialTrabalhador();
166| if ($esocialTrabalhador) {
167| $dadosTrabalhador = $esocialTrabalhador->getDadosTrabalhador();
168| $endereco = $esocialTrabalhador->getEndereco();
169|
170| $data['esocialTrabalhador'] = [
171| 'id' => $esocialTrabalhador->getId(),
172| 'isTrabalhadorSemVinculo' => $esocialTrabalhador->getIsTrabalhadorSemVinculo(),
173| 'dadosTrabalhador' => $dadosTrabalhador ? [
174| 'cpfTrab' => $dadosTrabalhador->getCpfTrab(),
175| 'nmTrab' => $dadosTrabalhador->getNmTrab(),
176| 'sexo' => $dadosTrabalhador->getSexo(),
177| 'racaCor' => $dadosTrabalhador->getRacaCor(),
178| 'estCiv' => $dadosTrabalhador->getEstCiv(),
179| 'grauInstr' => $dadosTrabalhador->getGrauInstr(),
180| 'nmSoc' => $dadosTrabalhador->getNmSoc(),
181| 'dtNascto' => $dadosTrabalhador->getDtNascto()?->format('Y-m-d'),
182| 'paisNascto' => $dadosTrabalhador->getPaisNascto(),
183| 'paisNac' => $dadosTrabalhador->getPaisNac(),
184| 'fonePrinc' => $dadosTrabalhador->getFonePrinc(),
185| 'emailPrinc' => $dadosTrabalhador->getEmailPrinc(),
186| 'dtAltDadosPessoais' => $dadosTrabalhador->getDtAltDadosPessoais()?->format('Y-m-d'),
187| ] : null,
188| 'endereco' => $endereco ? [
189| 'brasil' => $endereco->getBrasil() ? [
190| 'tpLograd' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getTpLograd(),
191| 'dscLograd' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getDscLograd(),
192| 'nrLograd' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getNrLograd(),
193| 'complemento' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getComplemento(),
194| 'bairro' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getBairro(),
195| 'cep' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getCep(),
196| 'codMunic' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getCodMunic(),
197| 'uf' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getUf(),
198| ] : null,
199| 'exterior' => $endereco->getExterior() ? [
200| 'paisResid' => $endereco->getExterior()->getPaisResid(),
201| 'dscLograd' => $endereco->getExterior()->getDscLograd(),
202| 'nrLograd' => $endereco->getExterior()->getNrLograd(),
203| 'complemento' => $endereco->getExterior()->getComplemento(),
204| 'bairro' => $endereco->getExterior()->getBairro(),
205| 'nmCid' => $endereco->getExterior()->getNmCid(),
206| 'codPostal' => $endereco->getExterior()->getCodPostal(),
207| ] : null,
208| ] : null,
209| ];
210| } else {
211| $data['esocialTrabalhador'] = null;
212| }
213|
214| // Extrair dados de remuneração (EsocialDadosRemuneracao)
215| $dadosRemuneracao = $event->getDadosRemuneracao();
216| if ($dadosRemuneracao) {
217| $data['dadosRemuneracao'] = [
218| 'id' => $dadosRemuneracao->getId(),
219| 'indMv' => $dadosRemuneracao->getIndMv(),
220| 'tpInscRemunOutrEmpr' => $dadosRemuneracao->getTpInscRemunOutrEmpr(),
221| 'nmTrab' => $dadosRemuneracao->getNmTrab(),
222| 'dtNascto' => $dadosRemuneracao->getDtNascto()?->format('Y-m-d'),
223| 'tpInscSucessaoVinc' => $dadosRemuneracao->getTpInscSucessaoVinc(),
224| 'nrInscSucessaoVinc' => $dadosRemuneracao->getNrInscSucessaoVinc(),
225| 'matricAnt' => $dadosRemuneracao->getMatricAnt(),
226| 'dtAdm' => $dadosRemuneracao->getDtAdm()?->format('Y-m-d'),
227| 'procJudTrab' => $dadosRemuneracao->getProcJudTrab(),
228| 'infoTerm' => $dadosRemuneracao->getInfoTerm(),
229| ];
230| } else {
231| $data['dadosRemuneracao'] = null;
232| }
233|
234| // Extrair dados do batch se existir
235| $batch = $event->getBatch();
236| if ($batch) {
237| $data['batch'] = [
238| 'id' => $batch->getId(),
239| 'cdResposta' => $batch->getCdResposta(),
240| 'descResposta' => $batch->getDescResposta(),
241| 'protocoloEnvio' => $batch->getProtocoloEnvio(),
242| 'dhRecepcao' => $batch->getDhRecepcao()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s'),
243| ];
244| } else {
245| $data['batch'] = null;
246| }
247|
248| // Extrair dados da resposta se existir
249| $response = $event->getResponse();
250| if ($response) {
251| $data['response'] = [
252| 'id' => $response->getId(),
253| 'tpAmb' => $response->getTpAmb(),
254| 'cdResposta' => $response->getCdResposta(),
255| 'descResposta' => $response->getDescResposta(),
256| 'nrRecibo' => $response->getNrRecibo(),
257| 'dhProcessamento' => $response->getDhProcessamento()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s'),
258| 'ocorrencias' => $response->getOcorrencias(),
259| ];
260| } else {
261| $data['response'] = null;
262| }
263|
264| return $data;
265| }
266|
267| // /**
268| // * @return EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[] Returns an array of EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento objects
269| // */
270| /*
271| public function findByExampleField($value)
272| {
273| return $this->createQueryBuilder('e')
274| ->andWhere('e.exampleField = :val')
275| ->setParameter('val', $value)
276| ->orderBy('e.id', 'ASC')
277| ->setMaxResults(10)
278| ->getQuery()
279| ->getResult()
280| ;
281| }
282| */
283|
284| /*
285| public function findOneBySomeField($value): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
286| {
287| return $this->createQueryBuilder('e')
288| ->andWhere('e.exampleField = :val')
289| ->setParameter('val', $value)
290| ->getQuery()
291| ->getOneOrNullResult()
292| ;
293| }
294| */
295|}
296|
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php"}
Result
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php (Total lines: 335)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-335
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Entity;
4|
5|use App\Repository\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository;
6|use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
7|
8|/**
9| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass=EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::class)
10| */
11|class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento extends EsocialEvents
12|{
13| /**
14| * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="EsocialDadosTrabalhador")
15| * @ORM\JoinColumn(name="esocial_dados_trabalhador_id", referencedColumnName="id", nullable=false)
16| */
17| private $esocialTrabalhador;
18|
19| /**
20| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=2, nullable=true)
21| */
22| private $mtvDeslig;
23|
24| /**
25| * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
26| */
27| private $dtDeslig;
28|
29| /**
30| * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
31| */
32| private $dtAvPrv;
33|
34| /**
35| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=1, nullable=true)
36| */
37| private $indPagtoApi;
38|
39| /**
40| * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
41| */
42| private $dtProjFimApi;
43|
44| /**
45| * @ORM\Column(type="integer", nullable=true)
46| */
47| private $pensAlim;
48|
49| /**
50| * @ORM\Column(type="decimal", precision=10, scale=2, nullable=true)
51| */
52| private $percAliment;
53|
54| /**
55| * @ORM\Column(type="decimal", precision=10, scale=2, nullable=true)
56| */
57| private $vrAlim;
58|
59| /**
60| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=20, nullable=true)
61| */
62| private $nrProcTrab;
63|
64| /**
65| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=1, nullable=true)
66| */
67| private $indPdv;
68|
69| /**
70| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=11, nullable=true)
71| */
72| private $cpfSubstituto;
73|
74| /**
75| * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
76| */
77| private $dtNascto;
78|
79| /**
80| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=11, nullable=true)
81| */
82| private $novoCpf;
83|
84| /**
85| * @ORM\Column(type="integer", nullable=true)
86| */
87| private $indRemun;
88|
89| /**
90| * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
91| */
92| private $dtFimRemun;
93|
94| /**
95| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=5, nullable=true)
96| */
97| private $insConsig;
98|
99| /**
100| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=40, nullable=true)
101| */
102| private $nrContr;
103|
104| /**
105| * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity=EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class, )
106| * @ORM\JoinColumn(nullable=false)
107| */
108| private $dadosRemuneracao;
109|
110| public function getDadosRemuneracao(): ?EsocialDadosRemuneracao
111| {
112| return $this->dadosRemuneracao;
113| }
114|
115| public function setDadosRemuneracao(?EsocialDadosRemuneracao $dadosRemuneracao): self
116| {
117| $this->dadosRemuneracao = $dadosRemuneracao;
118|
119| return $this;
120| }
121|
122| public function getEsocialTrabalhador()
123| {
124| return $this->esocialTrabalhador;
125| }
126|
127| public function setEsocialTrabalhador(?EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador): void
128| {
129| $this->esocialTrabalhador = $esocialTrabalhador;
130| }
131|
132| public function getMtvDeslig(): ?string
133| {
134| return $this->mtvDeslig;
135| }
136|
137| public function setMtvDeslig(?string $mtvDeslig): self
138| {
139| $this->mtvDeslig = $mtvDeslig;
140|
141| return $this;
142| }
143|
144| public function getDtDeslig(): ?\DateTimeInterface
145| {
146| return $this->dtDeslig;
147| }
148|
149| public function setDtDeslig(?\DateTimeInterface $dtDeslig): self
150| {
151| $this->dtDeslig = $dtDeslig;
152|
153| return $this;
154| }
155|
156| public function getDtAvPrv(): ?\DateTimeInterface
157| {
158| return $this->dtAvPrv;
159| }
160|
161| public function setDtAvPrv(?\DateTimeInterface $dtAvPrv): self
162| {
163| $this->dtAvPrv = $dtAvPrv;
164|
165| return $this;
166| }
167|
168| public function getIndPagtoApi(): ?string
169| {
170| return $this->indPagtoApi;
171| }
172|
173| public function setIndPagtoApi(?string $indPagtoApi): self
174| {
175| $this->indPagtoApi = $indPagtoApi;
176|
177| return $this;
178| }
179|
180| public function getDtProjFimApi(): ?\DateTimeInterface
181| {
182| return $this->dtProjFimApi;
183| }
184|
185| public function setDtProjFimApi(?\DateTimeInterface $dtProjFimApi): self
186| {
187| $this->dtProjFimApi = $dtProjFimApi;
188|
189| return $this;
190| }
191|
192| public function getPensAlim(): ?int
193| {
194| return $this->pensAlim;
195| }
196|
197| public function setPensAlim(?int $pensAlim): self
198| {
199| $this->pensAlim = $pensAlim;
200|
201| return $this;
202| }
203|
204| public function getPercAliment(): ?int
205| {
206| return $this->percAliment;
207| }
208|
209| public function setPercAliment(?int $percAliment): self
210| {
211| $this->percAliment = $percAliment;
212|
213| return $this;
214| }
215|
216| public function getVrAlim(): ?int
217| {
218| return $this->vrAlim;
219| }
220|
221| public function setVrAlim(?int $vrAlim): self
222| {
223| $this->vrAlim = $vrAlim;
224|
225| return $this;
226| }
227|
228| public function getNrProcTrab(): ?string
229| {
230| return $this->nrProcTrab;
231| }
232|
233| public function setNrProcTrab(?string $nrProcTrab): self
234| {
235| $this->nrProcTrab = $nrProcTrab;
236|
237| return $this;
238| }
239|
240| public function getIndPdv(): ?string
241| {
242| return $this->indPdv;
243| }
244|
245| public function setIndPdv(?string $indPdv): self
246| {
247| $this->indPdv = $indPdv;
248|
249| return $this;
250| }
251|
252| public function getCpfSubstituto(): ?string
253| {
254| return $this->cpfSubstituto;
255| }
256|
257| public function setCpfSubstituto(?string $cpfSubstituto): self
258| {
259| $this->cpfSubstituto = $cpfSubstituto;
260|
261| return $this;
262| }
263|
264| public function getDtNascto(): ?\DateTimeInterface
265| {
266| return $this->dtNascto;
267| }
268|
269| public function setDtNascto(?\DateTimeInterface $dtNascto): self
270| {
271| $this->dtNascto = $dtNascto;
272|
273| return $this;
274| }
275|
276| public function getNovoCpf(): ?string
277| {
278| return $this->novoCpf;
279| }
280|
281| public function setNovoCpf(?string $novoCpf): self
282| {
283| $this->novoCpf = $novoCpf;
284|
285| return $this;
286| }
287|
288| public function getIndRemun(): ?int
289| {
290| return $this->indRemun;
291| }
292|
293| public function setIndRemun(?int $indRemun): self
294| {
295| $this->indRemun = $indRemun;
296|
297| return $this;
298| }
299|
300| public function getDtFimRemun(): ?\DateTimeInterface
301| {
302| return $this->dtFimRemun;
303| }
304|
305| public function setDtFimRemun(?\DateTimeInterface $dtFimRemun): self
306| {
307| $this->dtFimRemun = $dtFimRemun;
308|
309| return $this;
310| }
311|
312| public function getInsConsig(): ?string
313| {
314| return $this->insConsig;
315| }
316|
317| public function setInsConsig(?string $insConsig): self
318| {
319| $this->insConsig = $insConsig;
320|
321| return $this;
322| }
323|
324| public function getNrContr(): ?string
325| {
326| return $this->nrContr;
327| }
328|
329| public function setNrContr(?string $nrContr): self
330| {
331| $this->nrContr = $nrContr;
332|
333| return $this;
334| }
335|}
Request #3
deepseek-v4-flash
P:38K C:1.89K CR:30.85K CW:0
14764ms
Reasoning
Interesting. The entity columns `percAliment` and `vrAlim` are `decimal(10,2)` BUT getters/setters are typed `?int`! That's an existing entity inconsistency. Actually the Doctrine column type is decimal(10,2), so value returned from DB would be string "1234.56". The setters declare `?int` param — setting an int would store an int into a decimal column. The repository saveEventS2299 passes through `$data['percAliment'] ?? null` raw — probably strings from front. So existing code stores decimal string. The new code uses `intOrNull`, which casts to int, losing decimals, and type mismatch with setter typed ?int... Actually PHP would coerce; Doctrine decimal column with int value stores "1234" maybe with .00? Actually if you set int to a decimal column in Doctrine, it converts; fine. But percAliment for pensão alimentícia can be a percent with decimals (e.g., 30.5) or the entity stores percent as decimal. `percAliment` numeric type in eSocial S-2299 per layout: percAliment is a numeric (decimal) with up to 2 decimals? In eSocial S-2299, `percAliment` is percent with 2 decimals (e.g., 30.50). And `vrAlim` is value in R$ with cents. So `intOrNull` truncation is a real precision loss. However the entity setter typed ?int means the entity was designed to treat them as int? The getter returns ?int too. Hmm, but doctrine decimal returns string typically. `getVrAlim(): ?int` with decimal returning string would be a type error under strict_types? Entities generally not declare strict types; and file EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php starts `<?php` without strict_types, so no error, but it returns string despite typed int — weak typing does not coerce return types? Actually return type declaration `?int` with value "1234.56" would throw TypeError under coercive typing? For return types, coercion happens under weak typing only for scalar types that can be coerced without loss? int <- "1234.56" would throw TypeError "Return value must be of type int, string returned"? Actually with coercive typing (non-strict), a string "1234" would coerce to int; "1234.56" would NOT coerce (loses precision → TypeError). Hmm. This entity seems inconsistent already; but the field is only read where? In templates maybe typed loosely. Anyway, not central.
Wait, but the review plan issue #6: intOrNull on vrAlim/percAliment loses decimals. But since the entity setters are typed ?int, they'd also lose decimals even if we passed strings. But the plan says confirm type. Column is decimal(10,2). Since saveEventS2299 currently passes raw strings from the form (no conversion), the form presumably posts percAliment as "30.5" string and Doctrine stores it as decimal. Wait, the setter expects ?int. Passing "30.5" string to a function declared `setPercAliment(?int $percAliment)` in non-strict mode → coercion from "30.5" to int fails (non-coercible) → TypeError! Hmm... unless the actual DB form sends ints. This is pre-existing weirdness; not part of this diff. The new code path `intOrNull` uses int casting for both vrAlim and percAliment, but entity setters are typed ?int. So actually the new code is consistent with setter type (int) but inconsistent with DB column decimal(10,2) and with the semantics of monetary/percentage values.
Actually let me check the actual values: for pensão alimentícia fields in eSocial S-2299:
- pensAlim = indPensAlim (1/2/3). Actually `pensAlim` in the code is set with int, and in repository uses raw value. Hmm.
Wait, hold on. The entity's `pensAlim` column is integer. `percAliment` is decimal(10,2) and `vrAlim` decimal(10,2). eSocial: percAliment is percent (e.g., "30.5"), vrAlim is value in money (R$). Both should preserve decimals. So truncation is real. But given entity getters return ?int, and non-strict... Wait is strict_types enabled for this file? The file starts with `<?php` then `namespace`, no `declare(strict_types=1)`. So calls in weak mode: passing "30.5" to a typed `?int` param in weak mode attempts coercion; if cannot, TypeError. But wait the new `intOrNull` returns actual int, so setter receives int - fine. So new code avoids TypeError by design (maybe that's why they convert to int!). But truncates decimal.
Given the plan flags this and asked to check the column type: column decimal(10,2). So yes, they intended decimal values but convert to int. That's precision loss. But I should weigh: the automation default config will be empty strings → null, so not typically set. When a user manually sets in config, they'd supply... but wait, the action `has_config: false` in YAML! So the automation has no config UI; config only has `to: flow_responsible` preset. So `percAliment` etc. only come if someone configures raw config. Hmm. But the payload's fields mostly come from config values, which are empty in default template. So in the default flow, vrAlim/percAliment will be null anyway. So the precision loss is only when config is set programmatically; this is a lower priority but still a code-level correctness concern. Given the action has no config UI, maybe low/medium.
Actually wait, the config in the seeded template for S-2299 automation: actionConfig = [to flow_responsible, _default_automation_id]. So yes fields empty. But this action's config could later be edited to include fields. Also the template allows customization.
Given constraints "precisão vs recall", I should decide which findings are real defects likely to matter.
Let me examine key diff of the new handler method carefully again in the service file to confirm.
Reading lines 14924-15260 in AutomationExecutionService.
Also, verify flow of executeNotify to understand message with `{{member_name}}` resolution: need to read where messages get templated, and check where the "member" for template context comes from. In the diff, they call:
```
$notification = $this->executeNotify([
'to' => 'company_member',
'company_member_id' => (string) $responsible->getId(),
'title' => 'Revisar desligamento eSocial (S-2299)',
'message' => 'O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado ...',
...
'system_sender' => true,
], $member, array_merge($context, [
'member_id' => (string) $companyMember->getId(),
'esocial_s2299_review_url' => $reviewUrl,
]));
```
So `$member` = FlowInstanceMember. Let's check how other similar flows notify "member_name": for offboarding, maybe member_name resolves to the offboarding employee when member is FlowInstanceMember? Let's look at executeNotify signature and how templates resolve member_name. Let me read lines around 13800-13960.
Let me read AutomationExecutionService file sections around 13800-13970, and around 14920-15260, and around 7000-7060.
Given file is huge, we can't read whole. Let's do targeted reads.
Vou ler o trecho do novo handler e da lógica de notificação no `AutomationExecutionService`, além de verificar o fluxo normal de criação/edição do S-2299 no controller.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 14920, "end_line": 15260}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15468)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 14920-15260
14920| if ($member->getSourceType() !== 'offboarding') {
14921| return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Esta ação só pode ser usada em contexto de offboarding'];
14922| }
14923|
14924| return $this->offboardingToRecruitment->createFromOffboarding($member, $config, $context);
14925| }
14926|
14927| private function executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
14928| {
14929| if (!$member instanceof FlowInstanceMember) {
14930| return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Membro não encontrado'];
14931| }
14932|
14933| if ($member->getSourceType() !== 'offboarding') {
14934| return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Esta ação só pode ser usada em contexto de offboarding'];
14935| }
14936|
14937| $flowInstance = $member->getFlowInstance();
14938| $company = $flowInstance?->getCompany();
14939| if (!$company instanceof Company || $company->getEsocialMode() === null) {
14940| return ['executed' => false, 'skipped' => true, 'reason' => 'esocial_disabled'];
14941| }
14942|
14943| try {
14944| $offboardingMember = $this->findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember($member);
14945| if (!$offboardingMember) {
14946| return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'OffboardingMember não encontrado'];
14947| }
14948|
14949| $companyMember = $offboardingMember->getCompanyMember();
14950| if (!$companyMember instanceof CompanyMembers) {
14951| return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Colaborador do offboarding não encontrado'];
14952| }
14953|
14954| $responsible = $this->resolveEsocialS2299Responsible($config, $member, $offboardingMember);
14955| if (!$responsible instanceof CompanyMembers) {
14956| $this->log('warning', 'Responsável do S-2299 não resolvido para automação de offboarding', [
14957| 'flowInstanceMemberId' => $member->getId(),
14958| 'offboardingMemberId' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
14959| ]);
14960|
14961| return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Responsável pelo preenchimento do S-2299 não encontrado'];
14962| }
14963|
14964| $esocialTrabalhador = $this->entityManager
14965| ->getRepository(EsocialDadosTrabalhador::class)
14966| ->findOneBy(['companyMember' => $companyMember]);
14967|
14968| $payload = $this->buildEsocialS2299DraftPayload($offboardingMember, $companyMember, $responsible, $config);
14969| $event = null;
14970| $eventStatus = 'draft_only';
14971| $missing = [];
14972|
14973| if (!$esocialTrabalhador instanceof EsocialDadosTrabalhador) {
14974| $missing[] = 'esocial_worker_data';
14975| } else {
14976| $remuneracao = $this->entityManager
14977| ->getRepository(EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class)
14978| ->findByTrabalhador($esocialTrabalhador);
14979|
14980| if (!$remuneracao instanceof EsocialDadosRemuneracao) {
14981| $missing[] = 'esocial_remuneration_data';
14982| } else {
14983| $latestEvent = $this->findLatestEsocialS2299Event($esocialTrabalhador);
14984| if ($latestEvent instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $latestEvent->getStatus() !== 'pendente') {
14985| $event = $latestEvent;
14986| $eventStatus = 'existing_not_editable';
14987| } elseif ($latestEvent instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
14988| $event = $latestEvent;
14989| $event->setUpdatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
14990| $eventStatus = 'updated';
14991| } else {
14992| $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
14993| $event->setModo('INC');
14994| $event->setCompany($company);
14995| $event->setTpAmb($company->getEsocialMode() ?? '2');
14996| $event->setTpInscTransmissor(1);
14997| $event->setNrInscTransmissor($this->onlyDigits((string) $company->getCnpj()));
14998| $event->setEsocialTrabalhador($esocialTrabalhador);
14999| $event->setIndRetif(1);
15000| $event->setStatus('pendente');
15001| $event->setCreatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
15002| $eventStatus = 'created';
15003| }
15004|
15005| if ($eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable') {
15006| $event->setDadosRemuneracao($remuneracao);
15007| $this->applyEsocialS2299Payload($event, $payload);
15008| $this->entityManager->persist($event);
15009| }
15010| }
15011| }
15012|
15013| $reviewUrl = $this->buildEsocialS2299ReviewUrl($companyMember);
15014| $metadata = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? [];
15015| if (!is_array($metadata)) {
15016| $metadata = [];
15017| }
15018|
15019| $metadata['esocialS2299Draft'] = [
15020| 'payload' => $payload,
15021| 'offboardingMemberId' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
15022| 'companyMemberId' => $companyMember->getId(),
15023| 'responsibleId' => $responsible->getId(),
15024| 'eventId' => $event?->getId(),
15025| 'eventStatus' => $eventStatus,
15026| 'missing' => $missing,
15027| 'reviewUrl' => $reviewUrl,
15028| 'updatedAt' => (new \DateTimeImmutable())->format('c'),
15029| ];
15030|
15031| $member->setSourceMetadata($metadata);
15032| $this->entityManager->persist($member);
15033| $this->entityManager->flush();
15034|
15035| if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
15036| $metadata = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? [];
15037| $metadata['esocialS2299Draft']['eventId'] = $event->getId();
15038| $member->setSourceMetadata($metadata);
15039| $this->entityManager->persist($member);
15040| $this->entityManager->flush();
15041| }
15042|
15043| $notification = $this->executeNotify([
15044| 'to' => 'company_member',
15045| 'company_member_id' => (string) $responsible->getId(),
15046| 'title' => 'Revisar desligamento eSocial (S-2299)',
15047| 'message' => 'O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding. Abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar os detalhes.',
15048| 'message_html' => '<p>O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding.</p><p style="margin-top:1.25rem;"><a href="' . htmlspecialchars($reviewUrl, ENT_QUOTES, 'UTF-8') . '" style="display:inline-block;background-color:#277591;color:#ffffff;padding:10px 16px;border-radius:6px;font-weight:bold;text-decoration:none;">Revisar desligamento eSocial</a></p>',
15049| 'system_sender' => true,
15050| ], $member, array_merge($context, [
15051| 'member_id' => (string) $companyMember->getId(),
15052| 'esocial_s2299_review_url' => $reviewUrl,
15053| ]));
15054|
15055| return [
15056| 'success' => true,
15057| 'message' => $event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable'
15058| ? 'Rascunho do S-2299 criado/atualizado e responsável notificado'
15059| : ($eventStatus === 'existing_not_editable'
15060| ? 'Rascunho do S-2299 registrado; já existe evento oficial não editável para este trabalhador'
15061| : 'Rascunho do S-2299 registrado; dados eSocial pendentes impedem criar o evento oficial'),
15062| 'offboardingMemberId' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
15063| 'companyMemberId' => $companyMember->getId(),
15064| 'responsibleId' => $responsible->getId(),
15065| 'eventId' => $event?->getId(),
15066| 'eventStatus' => $eventStatus,
15067| 'missing' => $missing,
15068| 'reviewUrl' => $reviewUrl,
15069| 'notification' => $notification,
15070| ];
15071| } catch (\Throwable $e) {
15072| $this->log('error', 'Erro ao criar rascunho S-2299 via offboarding', [
15073| 'error' => $e->getMessage(),
15074| 'memberId' => $member->getId(),
15075| ]);
15076|
15077| return ['success' => false, 'error' => $e->getMessage()];
15078| }
15079| }
15080|
15081| private function resolveEsocialS2299Responsible(array $config, FlowInstanceMember $member, \App\Entity\OffboardingMember $offboardingMember): ?CompanyMembers
15082| {
15083| $configuredId = $config['responsible_id']
15084| ?? $config['responsibleId']
15085| ?? $config['company_member_id']
15086| ?? $config['member_id']
15087| ?? null;
15088|
15089| if ($configuredId) {
15090| $responsible = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find((int) $configuredId);
15091| if ($responsible instanceof CompanyMembers) {
15092| return $responsible;
15093| }
15094| }
15095|
15096| $flowResponsible = $member->getFlowInstance()?->getFlowResponsible();
15097| if ($flowResponsible instanceof CompanyMembers) {
15098| return $flowResponsible;
15099| }
15100|
15101| $offboardingResponsible = $offboardingMember->getOffboarding()?->getOffboardingFlowResponsible();
15102| if ($offboardingResponsible instanceof CompanyMembers) {
15103| return $offboardingResponsible;
15104| }
15105|
15106| return null;
15107| }
15108|
15109| private function buildEsocialS2299DraftPayload(
15110| \App\Entity\OffboardingMember $offboardingMember,
15111| CompanyMembers $companyMember,
15112| CompanyMembers $responsible,
15113| array $config
15114| ): array {
15115| $dismissalDate = $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate() ?? $offboardingMember->getRequestedAt();
15116|
15117| return [
15118| 'member' => $companyMember->getId(),
15119| 'motivoDesligamento' => $config['motivoDesligamento'] ?? $config['mtvDeslig'] ?? '',
15120| 'dataDesligamento' => $dismissalDate ? $dismissalDate->format('Y-m-d') : '',
15121| 'dataConcessaoAviso' => $config['dataConcessaoAviso'] ?? '',
15122| 'avisoPrevioIndenizado' => $config['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ?? '',
15123| 'dataTerminoAviso' => $config['dataTerminoAviso'] ?? '',
15124| 'pensAlim' => $config['pensAlim'] ?? '',
15125| 'percAliment' => $config['percAliment'] ?? '',
15126| 'vrAlim' => $config['vrAlim'] ?? '',
15127| 'numeroProcesso' => $config['numeroProcesso'] ?? '',
15128| 'indPdv' => $config['indPdv'] ?? '',
15129| 'cpfSubstituto' => $config['cpfSubstituto'] ?? '',
15130| 'dataNascimentoTitular' => $config['dataNascimentoTitular'] ?? '',
15131| 'novoCpfTrabalhador' => $config['novoCpfTrabalhador'] ?? '',
15132| 'indRemun' => $config['indRemun'] ?? '',
15133| 'dtFimRemun' => $config['dtFimRemun'] ?? '',
15134| 'matriculaInstituicao' => $config['matriculaInstituicao'] ?? '',
15135| 'numeroContrato' => $config['numeroContrato'] ?? '',
15136| '_offboarding' => [
15137| 'offboardingMemberId' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
15138| 'offboardingId' => $offboardingMember->getOffboarding()?->getId(),
15139| 'reason' => $offboardingMember->getReason(),
15140| 'responsibleId' => $responsible->getId(),
15141| 'responsibleName' => $responsible->getFullName(),
15142| ],
15143| ];
15144| }
15145|
15146| private function findLatestEsocialS2299Event(EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
15147| {
15148| return $this->entityManager
15149| ->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
15150| ->findOneBy(
15151| ['esocialTrabalhador' => $esocialTrabalhador],
15152| ['id' => 'DESC']
15153| );
15154| }
15155|
15156| private function applyEsocialS2299Payload(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $event, array $payload): void
15157| {
15158| $event->setMtvDeslig($this->stringOrNull($payload['motivoDesligamento'] ?? null));
15159| $event->setDtDeslig($this->dateOrNull($payload['dataDesligamento'] ?? null));
15160| $event->setDtAvPrv($this->dateOrNull($payload['dataConcessaoAviso'] ?? null));
15161| $event->setIndPagtoApi($this->booleanStringOrNull($payload['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ?? null));
15162| $event->setDtProjFimApi($this->dateOrNull($payload['dataTerminoAviso'] ?? null));
15163| $event->setPensAlim($this->intOrNull($payload['pensAlim'] ?? null));
15164| $event->setPercAliment($this->intOrNull($payload['percAliment'] ?? null));
15165| $event->setVrAlim($this->intOrNull($payload['vrAlim'] ?? null));
15166| $event->setNrProcTrab($this->stringOrNull($payload['numeroProcesso'] ?? null));
15167| $event->setIndPdv($this->stringOrNull($payload['indPdv'] ?? null));
15168| $event->setCpfSubstituto($this->cpfOrNull($payload['cpfSubstituto'] ?? null));
15169| $event->setDtNascto($this->dateOrNull($payload['dataNascimentoTitular'] ?? null));
15170| $event->setNovoCpf($this->cpfOrNull($payload['novoCpfTrabalhador'] ?? null));
15171| $event->setIndRemun($this->intOrNull($payload['indRemun'] ?? null));
15172| $event->setDtFimRemun($this->dateOrNull($payload['dtFimRemun'] ?? null));
15173| $event->setInsConsig($this->stringOrNull($payload['matriculaInstituicao'] ?? null));
15174| $event->setNrContr($this->stringOrNull($payload['numeroContrato'] ?? null));
15175| }
15176|
15177| private function buildEsocialS2299ReviewUrl(CompanyMembers $companyMember): string
15178| {
15179| $path = $this->router
15180| ? $this->router->generate('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => $companyMember->getId()])
15181| : '/my-company/member/' . $companyMember->getId();
15182|
15183| return $path . '?esocialTab=desligamento';
15184| }
15185|
15186| private function dateOrNull(mixed $value): ?\DateTimeInterface
15187| {
15188| if ($value instanceof \DateTimeInterface) {
15189| return \DateTime::createFromInterface($value);
15190| }
15191|
15192| $value = is_scalar($value) ? trim((string) $value) : '';
15193| if ($value === '') {
15194| return null;
15195| }
15196|
15197| try {
15198| return new \DateTime($value);
15199| } catch (\Throwable) {
15200| return null;
15201| }
15202| }
15203|
15204| private function stringOrNull(mixed $value): ?string
15205| {
15206| $value = is_scalar($value) ? trim((string) $value) : '';
15207| return $value !== '' ? $value : null;
15208| }
15209|
15210| private function intOrNull(mixed $value): ?int
15211| {
15212| if ($value === null || $value === '') {
15213| return null;
15214| }
15215|
15216| return is_numeric($value) ? (int) $value : null;
15217| }
15218|
15219| private function booleanStringOrNull(mixed $value): ?string
15220| {
15221| if ($value === null || $value === '') {
15222| return null;
15223| }
15224|
15225| if (is_bool($value)) {
15226| return $value ? 'S' : 'N';
15227| }
15228|
15229| $normalized = strtoupper(trim((string) $value));
15230| if (in_array($normalized, ['S', 'SIM', 'YES', 'TRUE', '1'], true)) {
15231| return 'S';
15232| }
15233| if (in_array($normalized, ['N', 'NAO', 'NÃO', 'NO', 'FALSE', '0'], true)) {
15234| return 'N';
15235| }
15236|
15237| return null;
15238| }
15239|
15240| private function cpfOrNull(mixed $value): ?string
15241| {
15242| $digits = $this->onlyDigits(is_scalar($value) ? (string) $value : '');
15243| return $digits !== '' ? $digits : null;
15244| }
15245|
15246| private function onlyDigits(string $value): string
15247| {
15248| return preg_replace('/\D/', '', $value) ?? '';
15249| }
15250|
15251| // ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
15252| // VISIBILIDADE E ACESSO - OFFBOARDING
15253| // ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
15254|
15255| /**
15256| * Ação: Aguardar X dias para exibir offboarding ao colaborador
15257| *
15258| * Esta ação configura um delay antes do offboarding ser visível para o colaborador.
15259| * O offboarding só será exibido na tela do colaborador após X dias.
15260| *
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Controller/CompanyMemberController.php", "start_line": 520, "end_line": 800}
Result
File: src/Controller/CompanyMemberController.php (Total lines: 4410)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 520-800
520| $this->logger->error('Error saving event S2206: ' . $e->getMessage());
521| throw $e;
522| }
523|
524| return new Response('Event S2206 saved');
525| }
526|
527| public function saveEventS2299(Request $request): Response
528| {
529| $em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
530| $company = $this->security->getUser()->getCompany();
531|
532| $data = json_decode($request->getContent(), true);
533|
534| if ($data['member'] == null) {
535| $this->logger->error('Company Member ID is null');
536| }
537|
538| $companyMember = $this->getDoctrine()->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find($data['member']);
539|
540| // if ($this->checkS2200Status($companyMember)) {
541| // $this->logger->error('Evento S2200 ainda não processado');
542| // return new Response('Event S2200 not processed');
543| // }
544|
545| try {
546| $esocialTrabalhador = $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosTrabalhador::class)->findOneBy(['companyMember' => $companyMember]);
547| $remuneracao = $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class)->findByTrabalhador($esocialTrabalhador);
548| $event = $em->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)->saveEventS2299($esocialTrabalhador, $data, $company, $remuneracao);
549| $afterSaveResponse = $this->handleEventAfterSave($event, $data, 'S2299');
550| if ($afterSaveResponse !== null) {
551| return $afterSaveResponse;
552| }
553| } catch (\Exception $e) {
554| $this->logger->error('Error saving event S2299: ' . $e->getMessage());
555| throw $e;
556| }
557|
558| return new Response('Event S2299 saved');
559|
560| }
561|
562| public function saveEventS2230(Request $request): Response
563| {
564| $em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
565| $company = $this->security->getUser()->getCompany();
566|
567| $data = json_decode($request->getContent(), true);
568|
569| if ($data['member'] == null) {
570| $this->logger->error('Company Member ID is null');
571| }
572|
573| $companyMember = $this->getDoctrine()->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find($data['member']);
574|
575| // if ($this->checkS2200Status($companyMember)) {
576| // $this->logger->error('Evento S2200 ainda não processado');
577| // return new Response('Event S2200 not processed');
578| // }
579|
580| try {
581| $esocialTrabalhador = $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosTrabalhador::class)->findOneBy(['companyMember' => $companyMember]);
582| $event = $em->getRepository(EsocialS2230EvtAfastTemp::class)->saveEventS2230($data, $company, $esocialTrabalhador);
583| $afterSaveResponse = $this->handleEventAfterSave($event, $data, 'S2230');
584| if ($afterSaveResponse !== null) {
585| return $afterSaveResponse;
586| }
587| } catch (\Exception $e) {
588| $this->logger->error('Error saving event S2230: ' . $e->getMessage());
589| throw $e;
590| }
591|
592| return new Response('Event S2230 saved');
593| }
594|
595| public function saveEventS2399(Request $request): Response
596| {
597| $em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
598| $company = $this->security->getUser()->getCompany();
599|
600| $data = json_decode($request->getContent(), true);
601|
602| if ($data['member'] == null) {
603| $this->logger->error('Company Member ID is null');
604| }
605|
606| $companyMember = $this->getDoctrine()->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find($data['member']);
607|
608| // if ($this->checkS2200Status($companyMember)) {
609| // $this->logger->error('Evento S2200 ainda não processado');
610| // return new Response('Event S2200 not processed');
611| // }
612|
613| try {
614| $esocialTrabalhador = $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosTrabalhador::class)->findOneBy(['companyMember' => $companyMember]);
615| $remuneracao = $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class)->findByTrabalhador($esocialTrabalhador);
616| $event = $em->getRepository(EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino::class)->saveEventS2399($data, $company, $remuneracao);
617| $afterSaveResponse = $this->handleEventAfterSave($event, $data, 'S2399');
618| if ($afterSaveResponse !== null) {
619| return $afterSaveResponse;
620| }
621| } catch (\Exception $e) {
622| $this->logger->error('Error saving event S2399: ' . $e->getMessage());
623| throw $e;
624| }
625|
626| return new Response('Event S2399 saved');
627| }
628|
629| public function saveEventS2298(Request $request): Response
630| {
631| $em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
632| $company = $this->security->getUser()->getCompany();
633|
634| $data = json_decode($request->getContent(), true);
635|
636| if ($data['member'] == null) {
637| $this->logger->error('Company Member ID is null');
638| }
639|
640| $companyMember = $this->getDoctrine()->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find($data['member']);
641|
642| // if ($this->checkS2200Status($companyMember)) {
643| // $this->logger->error('Evento S2200 ainda não processado');
644| // return new Response('Event S2200 not processed');
645| // }
646|
647| try {
648| $esocialTrabalhador = $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosTrabalhador::class)->findOneBy(['companyMember' => $companyMember]);
649| $event = $em->getRepository(EsocialS2298EvtReintegr::class)->saveEventS2298($data, $company, $esocialTrabalhador);
650| $afterSaveResponse = $this->handleEventAfterSave($event, $data, 'S2298');
651| if ($afterSaveResponse !== null) {
652| return $afterSaveResponse;
653| }
654| } catch (\Exception $e) {
655| $this->logger->error('Error saving event S2298: ' . $e->getMessage());
656| throw $e;
657| }
658|
659| return new Response('Event S2298 saved');
660| }
661|
662| public function saveEventS1200(Request $request): Response
663| {
664| $em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
665| $company = $this->security->getUser()->getCompany();
666|
667| $data = json_decode($request->getContent(), true);
668|
669| // if ($data['memberId'] == null) {
670| // $this->logger->error('Company Member ID is null');
671| // }
672|
673| $companyMember = $this->getDoctrine()->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find($data['memberId']);
674|
675| // if ($this->checkS2200Status($companyMember)) {
676| // $this->logger->error('Evento S2200 ainda não processado');
677| // return new Response('Event S2200 not processed');
678| // }
679|
680| try {
681| $esocialTrabalhador = $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosTrabalhador::class)->findOneBy(['companyMember' => $companyMember]);
682| $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class)->saveDadosRemuneracao($data, $company, $companyMember, $esocialTrabalhador);
683| } catch (\Exception $e) {
684| $this->logger->error('Error saving event S1200: ' . $e->getMessage());
685| throw $e;
686| }
687|
688| return new Response('Event S1200 saved');
689| }
690|
691| public function sendTestEventS1200(int $member): JsonResponse
692| {
693| $em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
694| $company = $this->security->getUser()->getCompany();
695|
696| $companyMember = $em->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find($member);
697| if (!$companyMember || $companyMember->getCompany()->getId() !== $company->getId()) {
698| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Membro não encontrado.'], 404);
699| }
700|
701| $esocialTrabalhador = $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosTrabalhador::class)->findOneBy(['companyMember' => $companyMember]);
702| if (!$esocialTrabalhador) {
703| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Dados do trabalhador eSocial não encontrados.'], 404);
704| }
705|
706| $remuneracao = $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class)->findByTrabalhador($esocialTrabalhador);
707| if (!$remuneracao) {
708| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Dados de remuneração eSocial não encontrados. Salve a remuneração antes de testar o envio.'], 404);
709| }
710|
711| try {
712| $event = $em->getRepository(EsocialS1200EvtRemun::class)->saveS1200([
713| 'indApuracao' => 1,
714| 'perApur' => new \DateTimeImmutable('first day of this month'),
715| ], $company, $remuneracao);
716|
717| $this->messageBus->dispatch(new EnviarEventoMessage([$event->getId()]));
718|
719| return new JsonResponse([
720| 'success' => true,
721| 'message' => sprintf('Evento S-1200 #%d criado e enviado para a fila.', $event->getId()),
722| 'eventId' => $event->getId(),
723| ]);
724| } catch (\Throwable $e) {
725| $this->logger->error('Erro ao enviar S1200 de teste: ' . $e->getMessage(), ['member' => $member]);
726|
727| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Erro ao enviar S-1200: ' . $e->getMessage()], 500);
728| }
729| }
730|
731| public function deleteEventS1200Remuneracao(int $member): JsonResponse
732| {
733| $em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
734| $company = $this->security->getUser()->getCompany();
735|
736| $companyMember = $em->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find($member);
737| if (!$companyMember || $companyMember->getCompany()->getId() !== $company->getId()) {
738| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Membro não encontrado.'], 404);
739| }
740|
741| $esocialTrabalhador = $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosTrabalhador::class)->findOneBy(['companyMember' => $companyMember]);
742| if (!$esocialTrabalhador) {
743| return new JsonResponse(['success' => false, 'message' => 'Dados do trabalhador eSocial não encontrados.'], 404);
744| }
745|
746| $remuneracoes = $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class)->findBy([
747| 'esocialTrabalhador' => $esocialTrabalhador,
748| ]);
749|
750| if (count($remuneracoes) === 0) {
751| return new JsonResponse(['success' => true, 'message' => 'Nenhum dado de remuneração encontrado para remover.']);
752| }
753|
754| $em->beginTransaction();
755|
756| try {
757| $removedRemuneracoes = 0;
758| $removedEvents = 0;
759| $releasedRubricas = 0;
760|
761| foreach ($remuneracoes as $remuneracao) {
762| $relatedS1200Events = $em->getRepository(EsocialS1200EvtRemun::class)->findBy([
763| 'dadosRemuneracao' => $remuneracao,
764| ]);
765|
766| $blockingS2299 = $em->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)->findOneBy([
767| 'dadosRemuneracao' => $remuneracao,
768| ]);
769| $blockingS2399 = $em->getRepository(EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino::class)->findOneBy([
770| 'dadosRemuneracao' => $remuneracao,
771| ]);
772|
773| if ($blockingS2299 || $blockingS2399) {
774| $em->rollback();
775|
776| return new JsonResponse([
777| 'success' => false,
778| 'message' => 'Não é possível apagar a remuneração porque ela está vinculada a evento de desligamento/término.',
779| ], 409);
780| }
781|
782| foreach ($remuneracao->getInfoPerApuracoes() as $infoPerApuracao) {
783| foreach ($infoPerApuracao->getRemunPerApuracoes() as $remunPerApur) {
784| foreach ($remunPerApur->getItensRemun()->toArray() as $item) {
785| $remunPerApur->removeItensRemun($item);
786| $releasedRubricas++;
787| }
788| foreach ($remunPerApur->getItensRemunRubricas()->toArray() as $rubrica) {
789| $remunPerApur->removeItensRemunRubrica($rubrica);
790| }
791| }
792| }
793|
794| foreach ($remuneracao->getInfoPerAnts() as $infoPerAnt) {
795| foreach ($infoPerAnt->getRemunPerApuracoes() as $remunPerApur) {
796| foreach ($remunPerApur->getItensRemun()->toArray() as $item) {
797| $remunPerApur->removeItensRemun($item);
798| $releasedRubricas++;
799| }
800| foreach ($remunPerApur->getItensRemunRubricas()->toArray() as $rubrica) {
Request #4
deepseek-v4-flash
P:48.69K C:2.85K CR:39.81K CW:0
22559ms
Reasoning
Now I have good context for the event creation flow: the normal UI flow (`saveEventS2299` in CompanyMemberController) always creates a new S-2299 event via `saveEventS2299` (creates new each time). But the controller is generic; probably the UI lists events per member, so multiple S-2299 events could exist (e.g., after readmission). Let me look at how the member page displays existing S-2299 events & `prevEvts`. Also the guides template `motivo_desligamento` uses `prevEvts.termino` and `prevEvts.desligamento`. So prevEvts likely comes from repository method that builds prev events data. Let me search for `prevEvts` and how template loads.
Actually, this new automation (findLatestEsocialS2299Event by trabalhador) and the guide template... Let me search template for how prevEvts is derived (route).
Let me also check FlowInstanceMember sourceMetadata to see if serialization of metadata includes events; not needed.
Now confirm real issues:
### Issue A: Overwriting `pendente` events with blank payload
If the latest event is `pendente` (a draft event for current dismissal), the automation reapplies blank config fields clearing manually entered data (mtvDeslig, dtDeslig etc.). Also if latest event is a *pending draft from a different context* (e.g., offboarding for previous dismissal never transmitted or manual draft), it will overwrite. Is that likely? The requirement says idempotent. Since this S-2299 automation is intended as a "pre-fill draft for the responsible to review", the responsible then opens the "desligamento" tab and can edit/transmit. In the eSocial UI, how do users edit the draft? Look at the CompanyController around 6373: `$event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $event->getEsocialTrabalhador() !== null`. Perhaps a "save draft" endpoint updates existing pending event. Let me check where pending events get edited - maybe via `saveEventS2299` only creates new each time? Actually check handleEventAfterSave; or if the UI transmits pending events.
But is it a realistic re-run scenario? The trigger `employee_enters_stage` - member enters final stage once, but if moved back and forth, could re-enter. Also if multiple members? Each member instance separate. Trigger could be repeated after user config changes? Re-running automation would be possible when stage is re-entered after editing. Given "O responsável ... revisar ... depois transmitir/editar", a re-entry would clear manual changes. This is plausible. But also even in first run, when latest pending event was created by this same automation on a *previous* run (idempotent re-run scenario), the fields would already be empty anyway. But if a pending draft was created manually (in UI), automation re-run would clear data.
Actually wait: consider the case where there's an existing pending draft event created by the responsible *before* the member reached final stage (or in a previous offboarding). It picks that event and overwrites with automation's data. There's no linkage between the event and the offboarding. This is the crux. This is issue #1 and #2 combined.
### Issue B: findLatest picks latest event regardless of status and context
The repository `saveEventS2299` always creates a new event with status 'pendente'. Let's check the UI flow: On saving S-2299 form, they create a new event. If there is already an event for a previous desligamento... Actually let's search in EsocialDadosTrabalhadorRepository around lines 840, 1062 for s2299 events selection to understand how they determine "latest term" or which S-2299 to show/edit.
Let me read around those lines.
### Issue C: entity vs column type for percAliment/vrAlim (int vs decimal)
Given setters typed ?int, but columns decimal(10,2). Actually Doctrine column decimal means when hydrating, PHP value is string. Then `getVrAlim(): ?int` returning string would TypeError (return type). So maybe these columns were changed... Actually the entity getters declare ?int and column decimal — mismatch likely existing bug but not part of this PR. intOrNull truncation could be flagged as a data-integrity concern but given setter typed int, converting decimal to int may be "by design" though incorrect vs DB column. Hmm. Given repository passes raw strings from the front to setters typed ?int in weak mode: "1234.56" string to ?int param in weak typing coerces with precision loss? For function calls in weak mode, numeric strings with decimal fraction are NOT convertible to int (TypeError thrown since PHP 8? Actually weak mode coercion: string "1234.56" to int param - is it coercible? In weak typing, "1234" → int fine. "1234.56" has a fractional part; int conversion from string fraction is... For internal functions like strlen(1234.56) works. For user-defined functions with scalar type declarations, coercion rules: if the string is numeric and leading numeric portion... The rule: strings that are numeric will be coerced if no data loss? Actually PHP weak typing converts "1234.56" to int 1234 for parameter coercion with a notice? Let me recall: In coercive mode, string to int conversion happens if string is numeric (including "1234.56"? no). The docs: "int: ... strings that are numeric and don't contain a fractional part will be converted to int" — actually: "In coercive typing mode, float and integer... For example '1.5e3'"? Hmm.
PHP 8: type juggling for int parameters: accepts int or numeric string (that is a valid int literal). "1234.56" is not a valid integer literal string → TypeError? Actually in weak mode, if the value has leading numeric portion, e.g., "1234.56abc"? No. Weak mode scalar coercion: string to int uses the "leading numeric" rules unless the whole string is a valid integer literal... From PHP docs "String to int/float: if the string is numeric (see is_numeric) then numeric conversion happens, otherwise 0 (pre-PHP8?)". For parameter coercion in weak mode, PHP converts numeric strings: "1234.56" is numeric → becomes float? But target is int; float 1234.56 → int 1234 with deprecation? I think there's a deprecation about implicit float to int. Whatever, likely stored as 1234. This entity pre-existing mismatch is messy. Not necessarily a diff issue.
But we should focus on the newly added code. The new code explicitly converts to int with truncation of decimals on monetary fields (vrAlim) — real precision loss if the automation config supplies a value like 1500.50, generating the eSocial event with vrAlim 1500 instead of 1500.50. Given columns are decimal(10,2), the data model intends cents. So flag.
However, we must weigh relevance: In the default template, these config fields are empty → null. The action has no config UI (has_config false) so typical users cannot fill. But config can come from automation config editing in the flow builder (the builder might allow arbitrary JSON). Actually blocked/configurable? The flow detail template computes display label from config; automation editor may allow setting config values for fields of the action type. There might be config field definitions elsewhere. Regardless, code-wise the conversion is lossy for the payload. Medium/low.
### Issue D: Multiple flushes + notification after persist
The handler flushes event + metadata, then flushes again for eventId, then sends notification. If notification fails (returns 'sent'=>false?), it doesn't throw? executeNotify returns array. So not exception. But if it throws, event already committed, but catch returns success false though event was created. Real but only under exception. Since not using transaction, but Doctrine request-scoped, rollback semantics only with explicit transaction. Medium maybe, given the pattern across the service probably not using transactions elsewhere. Hmm.
Actually wait: is there a concern of double-flush leaving state? Not really except the atomicity.
### Issue E: responsible cross-company id not validated
`$config['company_member_id'] ?? $config['member_id']` — but wait, in the call they pass config with only to, message etc. Actually `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` receives `$config` from the automation action config, which for the seeded template contains only `to`/`_default_automation_id`. The `resolveEsocialS2299Responsible` uses config keys `responsible_id` etc. If someone adds such ID in automation config (from template copy etc.), they'd be resolved without company check. The fallback flowResponsible should belong to the company. Real cross-tenant data exposure but depends on config input. Medium.
Hmm but wait — important: In `resolveEsocialS2299Responsible`, the first priority: `$config['company_member_id']` or `$config['member_id']`. But note that in the notification call, config contains `company_member_id` for *notification recipient* = responsible id; but the handler's `$config` is the automation action config, not that notify array. So no clash.
### Issue F: The `$config['member_id']` key. In resolveEsocialS2299Responsible reading from automation config, member_id is ambiguous - could be a flow member id rather than company member id. Actually automation config may contain 'member_id' keyed to something else. This is speculative.
Let me check the guides template & how prevEvts is built, plus the fix.
Now the more important focus: The template fix in `motivo_desligamento.html.twig`: `value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab %}...` This file belongs to review group. Previously referenced `prevEvts.desligamento` which might not exist. Let me read the template for context to see whether the fix is complete/correct. But the surrounding lines not shown in diff except that one. In diff, we only see removal of `prevEvts.desligamento` replaced by `prevEvts.termino`. If `prevEvts` is null? If prevEvts itself may be null, `prevEvts.termino` would error in Twig if prevEvts is null (property access on null returns null? In Twig, accessing attribute on null returns null). Actually Twig returns null when accessing attribute on null; no error. So ok.
Let me look at the member guides template file around that area to understand context.
### Migration concerns
Let me check docs/database-changes file existence: other_changed_files mention docs but review only lists 6 files; PR files include docs. Wait the user_background says files include docs/database-changes/2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template.md and README, but those are not in <review_files>. The migration file being in review group means we need to ensure doc exists (it's in other changed files, but not review group; rule says migrations need doc — since doc file exists (mentioned in PR background as part of the PR and also in other changed? Actually other_changed_files only lists tests file). The review_files only include 6. Docs are not in review_files but they are part of PR per background "Amostra: ... docs/...". We can't comment on files outside review group though; but we can mention docs exist? The rule "Migration precisa ter documentação correspondente" is a check. Since docs file listed in PR (9 arquivos alterados), seems present. We don't need to flag.
Now migration seeds for all companies. Check previous migrations that seeded flow templates for pattern. Let me search migrations for seed_migration or flow_templates inserts.
Also verify whether flow_templates delete is referenced by flow instances: search for `flow_template_id` or entity FlowInstance mapping.
Let me search.
Vou verificar como a UI do eSocial edita eventos pendentes, como o template do guia recebe `prevEvts`, e se instâncias de fluxo referenciam `flow_template`.
Tool Calls (3)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Repository/EsocialDadosTrabalhadorRepository.php"], "search_text": "s2299Events"}
Result
File: src/Repository/EsocialDadosTrabalhadorRepository.php
Match lines: 4
840| $s2299Events = $em->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
846| foreach ($s2299Events as $event) {
1062| $s2299Events = $em->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
1068| foreach ($s2299Events as $event) {
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/"], "search_text": "flow_template_id"}
Result
File: src/Command/AdrianaWorkflowVerifyTemplatesCommand.php
Match lines: 2
200| $artifactTemplateId = (int) ($artifactRef['flow_template_id'] ?? $artifactRef['template_id'] ?? 0);
269| foreach (['flow_template_id', 'template_id', 'templateId', 'flow_id', 'flowId'] as $key) {
File: src/Command/CommunicationCenterAutomationsCommand.php
Match lines: 6
68| fa.flow_template_id,
69| (SELECT fs.flow_template_id FROM flow_stages fs WHERE fs.id = fa.flow_stage_id LIMIT 1)
199| fa.flow_template_id,
200| (SELECT fs.flow_template_id FROM flow_stages fs WHERE fs.id = fa.flow_stage_id LIMIT 1)
262| fa.flow_template_id,
263| (SELECT fs.flow_template_id FROM flow_stages fs WHERE fs.id = fa.flow_stage_id LIMIT 1)
File: src/Command/SeedPayrollDashboardSimulationCommand.php
Match lines: 2
250| WHERE fi.flow_template_id = :templateId
555| WHERE flow_template_id = :templateId
File: src/Controller/CommunicationCenterController.php
Match lines: 4
274| // COALESCE(fa.flow_template_id, fs.flow_template_id) garante que automações antigas
275| // criadas sem flow_template_id direto (apenas com flow_stage_id) também apareçam.
287| COALESCE(fa.flow_template_id, fs.flow_template_id) AS flowTemplateId,
293| LEFT JOIN flow_templates ft ON ft.id = COALESCE(fa.flow_template_id, fs.flow_template_id)
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystem/FlowAutomationController.php
Match lines: 2
1567| $templateId = $config['flow_template_id'] ?? $config['flowTemplateId'] ?? null;
1594| $templateId = $config['flow_template_id'] ?? $config['flowTemplateId'] ?? null;
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystem/FlowTemplateController.php
Match lines: 2
690| $templateId = $config['flow_template_id'] ?? $config['flowTemplateId'] ?? null;
717| $templateId = $config['flow_template_id'] ?? $config['flowTemplateId'] ?? null;
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystemController.php
Match lines: 3
1489| $templateId = $config['flow_template_id'] ?? $config['flowTemplateId'] ?? null;
1516| $templateId = $config['flow_template_id'] ?? $config['flowTemplateId'] ?? null;
1830| // Garante que flow_template_id seja preenchido (necessário para a lista da Central de Comunicação)
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 2
6462| COALESCE(fa.flow_template_id, fs.flow_template_id) AS flowTemplateId,
6468| LEFT JOIN flow_templates ft ON ft.id = COALESCE(fa.flow_template_id, fs.flow_template_id)
File: src/Entity/FlowTemplateProduct.php
Match lines: 2
16| * A unique constraint é (flow_template_id, product_id, slot_index), portanto o
21| * @ORM\UniqueConstraint(name="unique_template_product_slot", columns={"flow_template_id", "product_id", "slot_index"})
File: src/Service/Adriana/ConversationWorkflowStateService.php
Match lines: 6
1099| $artifactRef['flow_template_id'] = $navigation['template_id'];
1224| $artifactRef['flow_template_id'] = $navigation['template_id'];
1245| unset($artifactRef['open_route'], $artifactRef['flow_template_id'], $artifactRef['template_id']);
1285| $currentArtifactId = (int) ($artifactRef['flow_template_id'] ?? $artifactRef['template_id'] ?? 0);
1291| $artifactRef['flow_template_id'] = $templateId;
1357| foreach (['flow_template_id', 'template_id', 'templateId', 'flow_id', 'flowId'] as $key) {
File: src/Service/Adriana/Retrieval/WorkflowRetrievalIndexService.php
Match lines: 1
45| 'flow_template_id' => (int) $template->getId(),
File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowApprovedFlowTemplateMaterializer.php
Match lines: 2
189| foreach (['flow_template_id', 'template_id', 'templateId', 'flow_id', 'flowId'] as $key) {
744| $ref['flow_template_id'] = $templateId;
File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowApprovedSubmitService.php
Match lines: 1
545| $artifactRef['flow_template_id'] = $navigation['template_id'];
File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowDraftExportSyncService.php
Match lines: 1
178| foreach (['flow_template_id', 'template_id', 'templateId', 'flow_id', 'flowId'] as $key) {
File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowOpenRouteResolver.php
Match lines: 2
195| foreach (['template_id', 'templateId', 'flow_id', 'flowId', 'flow_template_id', 'flowTemplateId'] as $key) {
321| foreach (['flow_template_id', 'template_id', 'templateId'] as $key) {
File: src/Service/CommunicationCenterAutomationService.php
Match lines: 2
109| fa.flow_template_id,
110| (SELECT fs.flow_template_id FROM flow_stages fs WHERE fs.id = fa.flow_stage_id LIMIT 1)
File: src/Service/Governance/CaseAutomation/GovernanceCaseAutomationRuleSyncService.php
Match lines: 2
63| fa.flow_template_id,
64| (SELECT fs.flow_template_id FROM flow_stages fs WHERE fs.id = fa.flow_stage_id LIMIT 1)
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceCasesAutomationProvisioner.php
Match lines: 3
107| COALESCE(fa.flow_template_id, fs.flow_template_id) AS flowTemplateId,
113| LEFT JOIN flow_templates ft ON ft.id = COALESCE(fa.flow_template_id, fs.flow_template_id)
324| LEFT JOIN flow_templates ft ON ft.id = COALESCE(fa.flow_template_id, fs.flow_template_id)
File: src/Service/OffboardingToRecruitmentService.php
Match lines: 2
244| $templateId = $config['flow_template_id'] ?? $config['flowTemplateId'] ?? null;
259| $this->log('warning', 'flow_template_id ausente ou inválido - buscando template de processo seletivo ativo', [
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php
Match lines: 4
411| fa.flow_template_id,
412| (SELECT fs.flow_template_id FROM flow_stages fs WHERE fs.id = fa.flow_stage_id LIMIT 1)
1347| fa.flow_template_id,
1348| (SELECT fs.flow_template_id FROM flow_stages fs WHERE fs.id = fa.flow_stage_id LIMIT 1)
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaIndicatorImprovementAutomationRunner.php
Match lines: 2
112| fa.flow_template_id,
113| (SELECT fs.flow_template_id FROM flow_stages fs WHERE fs.id = fa.flow_stage_id LIMIT 1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Entity/FlowInstance.php", "src/Entity/FlowInstanceMember.php"], "search_text": "flowTemplate"}
Result
File: src/Entity/FlowInstance.php Match lines: 6 32| * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity=FlowTemplate::class, inversedBy="flowInstances") 35| private $flowTemplate; 137| public function getFlowTemplate(): ?FlowTemplate 139| return $this->flowTemplate; 142| public function setFlowTemplate(?FlowTemplate $flowTemplate): self 144| $this->flowTemplate = $flowTemplate;
Request #5
deepseek-v4-flash
P:53.51K C:302 CR:51.46K CW:0
2917ms
Reasoning
FlowInstance references FlowTemplate via ManyToOne. So instances exist referencing flow_templates; deleting a template in down() could leave orphan instances (FK SET NULL?) or fail. It's a rollback concern. But maybe migrations down on seed data typically handled similarly. Let me look at existing precedent migrations that seed flow templates, to see whether they do similar and whether they're careful. Let's search migrations folder for seed of flow templates.
Vou comparar com migrations anteriores de seed de flow templates e ver como instâncias de fluxo são criadas a partir de template (para avaliar impacto do `down()`).
Tool Calls (3)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["migrations/"], "search_text": "INSERT INTO flow_templates"}
Result
File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php Match lines: 2 635| 'INSERT INTO flow_templates (workflow_id, company_id, name, description, is_active, settings, template_category, created_at, updated_at) 1238| 'INSERT INTO flow_templates (workflow_id, company_id, name, description, is_active, settings, template_category, created_at, updated_at) File: migrations/Version20260519173602.php Match lines: 1 64| 'INSERT INTO flow_templates (workflow_id, company_id, name, description, is_active, settings, template_category, created_at, updated_at) File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php Match lines: 1 212| 'INSERT INTO flow_templates (workflow_id, company_id, name, description, is_active, settings, template_category, created_at, updated_at)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["migrations/"], "search_text": "seed_migration"}
Result
File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php Match lines: 8 618| AND JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, \'$.seed_migration\')) = :seed 644| 'seed_migration' => self::JOURNEY_SEED_KEY, 810| AND JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(ft.settings, \'$.seed_migration\')) = :seed 852| 'seed_migration' => self::JOURNEY_SEED_KEY, 861| 'meta' => json_encode(['seed_migration' => self::JOURNEY_SEED_KEY, 'journeyCode' => $journeyCode, 'source' => 'journey_products_plan_seed'], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE), 1224| AND JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, \'$.seed_migration\')) = :seed 1247| 'seed_migration' => self::JOURNEY_PADRAO_KEY, 1306| AND JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, \'$.seed_migration\')) = :seed File: migrations/Version20260519155647.php Match lines: 2 35| $key = CicloInicialEssencialTemplateMaterializer::SEED_MIGRATION_KEY; 47| AND JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, '$.seed_migration')) = :key", File: migrations/Version20260519173602.php Match lines: 3 52| AND JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, \'$.seed_migration\')) = :seed 59| 'seed_migration' => self::SEED_KEY, 88| WHERE JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, \'$.seed_migration\')) = :seed', File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php Match lines: 3 71| WHERE JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, \'$.seed_migration\')) = :seed', 196| AND JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, \'$.seed_migration\')) = :seed 206| 'seed_migration' => self::SEED_KEY,
file_read_diff
Show Details
Arguments
{"path_array": ["migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php"]}
Result
==== FILE: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php ====
diff --git a/migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php b/migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
new file mode 100644
--- /dev/null
+++ b/migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
@@ -0,0 +1,451 @@
+<?php
+
+declare(strict_types=1);
+
+namespace DoctrineMigrations;
+
+use Doctrine\DBAL\Schema\Schema;
+use Doctrine\Migrations\AbstractMigration;
+
+final class Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate extends AbstractMigration
+{
+ private const SEED_KEY = '20260901171000_offboarding_esocial_s2299_flow_template';
+ private const WORKFLOW_SLUG = 'fluxo-de-saida';
+ private const TEMPLATE_NAME = 'Offboarding com eSocial (S-2299)';
+
+ public function getDescription(): string
+ {
+ return 'Cria flow padrão de offboarding com automação de rascunho eSocial S-2299 por empresa.';
+ }
+
+ public function isTransactional(): bool
+ {
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ public function up(Schema $schema): void
+ {
+ foreach (['company', 'products', 'workflows', 'workflow_products', 'flow_templates', 'flow_template_products', 'flow_stages', 'flow_activities', 'flow_automations'] as $table) {
+ if (!$this->tableExists($table)) {
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
+ $offboardingProductId = $this->ensureProduct('Offboarding', 'offboarding');
+ if ($offboardingProductId <= 0) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ $companyIds = $this->connection->fetchFirstColumn('SELECT id FROM company');
+ foreach ($companyIds as $companyIdRaw) {
+ $companyId = (int) $companyIdRaw;
+ if ($companyId <= 0) {
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ $workflowId = $this->ensureWorkflow($companyId);
+ if ($workflowId <= 0) {
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ $this->ensureWorkflowProduct($workflowId, $offboardingProductId, 0);
+
+ $templateId = $this->ensureTemplate($companyId, $workflowId);
+ if ($templateId <= 0) {
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ $this->ensureTemplateProduct($templateId, $offboardingProductId);
+ $this->ensureOffboardingStages($templateId, $offboardingProductId);
+ }
+ }
+
+ public function down(Schema $schema): void
+ {
+ if (!$this->tableExists('flow_templates')) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ $templateIds = $this->connection->fetchFirstColumn(
+ 'SELECT id FROM flow_templates
+ WHERE JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, \'$.seed_migration\')) = :seed',
+ ['seed' => self::SEED_KEY]
+ );
+
+ foreach ($templateIds as $templateIdRaw) {
+ $templateId = (int) $templateIdRaw;
+ if ($templateId <= 0) {
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if ($this->tableExists('flow_automations')) {
+ $this->connection->executeStatement(
+ 'DELETE fa FROM flow_automations fa
+ INNER JOIN flow_stages fs ON fs.id = fa.flow_stage_id
+ WHERE fs.flow_template_id = :templateId',
+ ['templateId' => $templateId]
+ );
+ }
+
+ if ($this->tableExists('flow_activities')) {
+ $this->connection->executeStatement(
+ 'DELETE fact FROM flow_activities fact
+ INNER JOIN flow_stages fs ON fs.id = fact.flow_stage_id
+ WHERE fs.flow_template_id = :templateId',
+ ['templateId' => $templateId]
+ );
+ }
+
+ if ($this->tableExists('flow_stages')) {
+ $this->connection->executeStatement(
+ 'DELETE FROM flow_stages WHERE flow_template_id = :templateId',
+ ['templateId' => $templateId]
+ );
+ }
+
+ if ($this->tableExists('flow_template_products')) {
+ $this->connection->executeStatement(
+ 'DELETE FROM flow_template_products WHERE flow_template_id = :templateId',
+ ['templateId' => $templateId]
+ );
+ }
+
+ $this->connection->executeStatement(
+ 'DELETE FROM flow_templates WHERE id = :templateId',
+ ['templateId' => $templateId]
+ );
+ }
+ }
+
+ private function ensureProduct(string $name, string $slug): int
+ {
+ $productId = (int) ($this->connection->fetchOne(
+ 'SELECT id FROM products WHERE slug = :slug LIMIT 1',
+ ['slug' => $slug]
+ ) ?: 0);
+
+ if ($productId > 0) {
+ $this->connection->executeStatement(
+ 'UPDATE products SET active = 1, name = CASE WHEN name IS NULL OR name = \'\' THEN :name ELSE name END WHERE id = :id',
+ ['id' => $productId, 'name' => $name]
+ );
+
+ return $productId;
+ }
+
+ $this->connection->executeStatement(
+ 'INSERT INTO products (name, active, slug) VALUES (:name, 1, :slug)',
+ ['name' => $name, 'slug' => $slug]
+ );
+
+ return (int) $this->connection->lastInsertId();
+ }
+
+ private function ensureWorkflow(int $companyId): int
+ {
+ $workflowId = (int) ($this->connection->fetchOne(
+ 'SELECT id FROM workflows WHERE company_id = :companyId AND slug = :slug LIMIT 1',
+ ['companyId' => $companyId, 'slug' => self::WORKFLOW_SLUG]
+ ) ?: 0);
+
+ if ($workflowId > 0) {
+ return $workflowId;
+ }
+
+ $this->connection->executeStatement(
+ 'INSERT INTO workflows (company_id, name, slug, description, is_default, created_at, updated_at)
+ VALUES (:companyId, :name, :slug, :description, 1, NOW(), NOW())',
+ [
+ 'companyId' => $companyId,
+ 'name' => 'Fluxos de Saída',
+ 'slug' => self::WORKFLOW_SLUG,
+ 'description' => 'Conduz o processo de desligamento do colaborador, garantindo organização, registro e conformidade em todas as etapas.',
+ ]
+ );
+
+ return (int) $this->connection->lastInsertId();
+ }
+
+ private function ensureWorkflowProduct(int $workflowId, int $productId, int $orderIndex): void
+ {
+ $exists = (int) ($this->connection->fetchOne(
+ 'SELECT id FROM workflow_products WHERE workflow_id = :workflowId AND product_id = :productId LIMIT 1',
+ ['workflowId' => $workflowId, 'productId' => $productId]
+ ) ?: 0);
+
+ if ($exists > 0) {
+ $this->connection->executeStatement(
+ 'UPDATE workflow_products SET order_index = :orderIndex WHERE id = :id',
+ ['orderIndex' => $orderIndex, 'id' => $exists]
+ );
+ return;
+ }
+
+ $this->connection->executeStatement(
+ 'INSERT INTO workflow_products (workflow_id, product_id, order_index)
+ VALUES (:workflowId, :productId, :orderIndex)',
+ ['workflowId' => $workflowId, 'productId' => $productId, 'orderIndex' => $orderIndex]
+ );
+ }
+
+ private function ensureTemplate(int $companyId, int $workflowId): int
+ {
+ $templateId = (int) ($this->connection->fetchOne(
+ 'SELECT id FROM flow_templates
+ WHERE workflow_id = :workflowId
+ AND JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, \'$.seed_migration\')) = :seed
+ LIMIT 1',
+ ['workflowId' => $workflowId, 'seed' => self::SEED_KEY]
+ ) ?: 0);
+
+ if ($templateId > 0) {
+ return $templateId;
+ }
+
+ $settings = json_encode([
+ 'seed_migration' => self::SEED_KEY,
+ 'preset' => 'offboarding_esocial_s2299',
+ 'modules' => ['offboarding' => true, 'esocial_s2299' => true],
+ ], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE);
+
+ $this->connection->executeStatement(
+ 'INSERT INTO flow_templates (workflow_id, company_id, name, description, is_active, settings, template_category, created_at, updated_at)
+ VALUES (:workflowId, :companyId, :name, :description, 1, :settings, :category, NOW(), NOW())',
+ [
+ 'workflowId' => $workflowId,
+ 'companyId' => $companyId,
+ 'name' => self::TEMPLATE_NAME,
+ 'description' => 'Flow padrão de offboarding com etapas customizáveis e criação do rascunho eSocial S-2299 na etapa final.',
+ 'settings' => $settings,
+ 'category' => 'offboarding_esocial',
+ ]
+ );
+
+ return (int) $this->connection->lastInsertId();
+ }
+
+ private function ensureTemplateProduct(int $templateId, int $productId): void
+ {
+ $exists = (int) ($this->connection->fetchOne(
+ 'SELECT id FROM flow_template_products
+ WHERE flow_template_id = :templateId AND product_id = :productId AND slot_index = 0
+ LIMIT 1',
+ ['templateId' => $templateId, 'productId' => $productId]
+ ) ?: 0);
+
+ if ($exists > 0) {
+ $this->connection->executeStatement(
+ 'UPDATE flow_template_products
+ SET order_index = 0, template_type = :templateType
+ WHERE id = :id',
+ ['id' => $exists, 'templateType' => 'fixo']
+ );
+ return;
+ }
+
+ $this->connection->executeStatement(
+ 'INSERT INTO flow_template_products (flow_template_id, product_id, order_index, template_type, slot_index)
+ VALUES (:templateId, :productId, 0, :templateType, 0)',
+ ['templateId' => $templateId, 'productId' => $productId, 'templateType' => 'fixo']
+ );
+ }
+
+ private function ensureOffboardingStages(int $templateId, int $productId): void
+ {
+ $stages = [
+ [
+ 'name' => 'Etapa 1 - Preparação',
+ 'description' => 'Etapa inicial de preparação do desligamento com comunicações e documentação necessária.',
+ 'orderIndex' => 1,
+ 'automations' => [
+ [
+ 'name' => 'Notificar responsável do fluxo',
+ 'triggerType' => 'on_enter',
+ 'actionType' => 'send_email_flow_responsible',
+ 'actionConfig' => ['to' => 'flow_responsible', 'template' => 'offboarding_stage_enter'],
+ 'conditions' => [['type' => 'on_enter', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0]],
+ 'actions' => [['type' => 'send_email', 'config' => ['to' => 'flow_responsible', 'template' => 'offboarding_stage_enter'], 'orderIndex' => 0]],
+ 'orderIndex' => 0,
+ ],
+ ],
+ ],
+ [
+ 'name' => 'Etapa 2 - Transição',
+ 'description' => 'Etapa de transição de responsabilidades e devolução de equipamentos.',
+ 'orderIndex' => 2,
+ 'automations' => [
+ [
+ 'name' => 'Avançar ao concluir 100% das atividades',
+ 'triggerType' => 'on_all_activities_complete',
+ 'actionType' => 'stage_change',
+ 'actionConfig' => [],
+ 'conditions' => [['type' => 'on_all_activities_complete', 'config' => ['value' => 100], 'orderIndex' => 0]],
+ 'actions' => [['type' => 'stage_change', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0]],
+ 'orderIndex' => 0,
+ ],
+ ],
+ ],
+ [
+ 'name' => 'Etapa 3 - Finalização',
+ 'description' => 'Etapa de finalização com entrevista de desligamento, procedimentos finais e preparação do evento eSocial S-2299.',
+ 'orderIndex' => 3,
+ 'automations' => [
+ [
+ 'name' => 'Criar Processo Seletivo ao concluir offboarding',
+ 'triggerType' => 'on_offboarding_complete',
+ 'actionType' => 'create_processo_seletivo',
+ 'actionConfig' => [],
+ 'conditions' => [['type' => 'on_offboarding_complete', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0]],
+ 'actions' => [['type' => 'create_processo_seletivo', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0]],
+ 'orderIndex' => 0,
+ ],
+ [
+ 'name' => 'Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299) ao entrar na etapa final',
+ 'triggerType' => 'on_enter',
+ 'actionType' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
+ 'actionConfig' => [
+ 'to' => 'flow_responsible',
+ '_default_automation_id' => 'offboarding_esocial_s2299_draft_on_final_stage_enter',
+ ],
+ 'conditions' => [['type' => 'on_enter', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0]],
+ 'actions' => [[
+ 'type' => 'create_esocial_s2299_draft',
+ 'config' => [
+ 'to' => 'flow_responsible',
+ '_default_automation_id' => 'offboarding_esocial_s2299_draft_on_final_stage_enter',
+ ],
+ 'orderIndex' => 0,
+ ]],
+ 'orderIndex' => 1,
+ ],
+ ],
+ ],
+ ];
+
+ foreach ($stages as $stage) {
+ $stageId = $this->ensureStage($templateId, $productId, $stage);
+ if ($stageId <= 0) {
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ $this->ensureActivity($stageId);
+
+ foreach ($stage['automations'] as $automation) {
+ $this->ensureAutomation($stageId, $automation);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * @param array{name: string, description: string, orderIndex: int} $stage
+ */
+ private function ensureStage(int $templateId, int $productId, array $stage): int
+ {
+ $stageId = (int) ($this->connection->fetchOne(
+ 'SELECT id
+ FROM flow_stages
+ WHERE flow_template_id = :templateId
+ AND product_id = :productId
+ AND product_slot_index IS NULL
+ AND LOWER(name) = LOWER(:name)
+ LIMIT 1',
+ [
+ 'templateId' => $templateId,
+ 'productId' => $productId,
+ 'name' => $stage['name'],
+ ]
+ ) ?: 0);
+
+ if ($stageId > 0) {
+ return $stageId;
+ }
+
+ $this->connection->executeStatement(
+ 'INSERT INTO flow_stages (flow_template_id, product_id, name, description, order_index, advance_rules, stage_category, phase_number, product_slot_index)
+ VALUES (:templateId, :productId, :name, :description, :orderIndex, :advanceRules, NULL, NULL, NULL)',
+ [
+ 'templateId' => $templateId,
+ 'productId' => $productId,
+ 'name' => $stage['name'],
+ 'description' => $stage['description'],
+ 'orderIndex' => (int) $stage['orderIndex'],
+ 'advanceRules' => json_encode([], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
+ ]
+ );
+
+ return (int) $this->connection->lastInsertId();
+ }
+
+ private function ensureActivity(int $stageId): void
+ {
+ $exists = (int) ($this->connection->fetchOne(
+ 'SELECT id FROM flow_activities WHERE flow_stage_id = :stageId AND name = :name LIMIT 1',
+ ['stageId' => $stageId, 'name' => 'Offboarding']
+ ) ?: 0);
+
+ if ($exists > 0) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ $this->connection->executeStatement(
+ 'INSERT INTO flow_activities (flow_stage_id, name, activity_type, config, order_index, process_stage_type, onboarding_activity_type_id, offboarding_activity_type_id)
+ VALUES (:stageId, :name, :activityType, :config, 1, NULL, NULL, NULL)',
+ [
+ 'stageId' => $stageId,
+ 'name' => 'Offboarding',
+ 'activityType' => 'activity',
+ 'config' => json_encode(['icon' => 'fa-regular fa-file-lines'], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
+ ]
+ );
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * @param array{name: string, triggerType: string, actionType: string, actionConfig: array<string, mixed>, conditions: array<int, mixed>, actions: array<int, mixed>, orderIndex: int} $automation
+ */
+ private function ensureAutomation(int $stageId, array $automation): void
+ {
+ $exists = (int) ($this->connection->fetchOne(
+ 'SELECT id
+ FROM flow_automations
+ WHERE flow_stage_id = :stageId
+ AND name = :name
+ AND trigger_type = :triggerType
+ AND action_type = :actionType
+ LIMIT 1',
+ [
+ 'stageId' => $stageId,
+ 'name' => $automation['name'],
+ 'triggerType' => $automation['triggerType'],
+ 'actionType' => $automation['actionType'],
+ ]
+ ) ?: 0);
+
+ if ($exists > 0) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ $this->connection->executeStatement(
+ 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, fixed_stage_type, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index)
+ VALUES (:stageId, NULL, NULL, :name, :triggerType, :actionType, :actionConfig, :conditions, :actions, 1, :orderIndex)',
+ [
+ 'stageId' => $stageId,
+ 'name' => $automation['name'],
+ 'triggerType' => $automation['triggerType'],
+ 'actionType' => $automation['actionType'],
+ 'actionConfig' => json_encode($automation['actionConfig'], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
+ 'conditions' => json_encode($automation['conditions'], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
+ 'actions' => json_encode($automation['actions'], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
+ 'orderIndex' => (int) $automation['orderIndex'],
+ ]
+ );
+ }
+
+ private function tableExists(string $tableName): bool
+ {
+ $schemaManager = method_exists($this->connection, 'createSchemaManager')
+ ? $this->connection->createSchemaManager()
+ : $this->connection->getSchemaManager();
+
+ return $schemaManager->tablesExist([$tableName]);
+ }
+}
Request #6
deepseek-v4-flash
P:59.42K C:268 CR:53.76K CW:0
3337ms
Reasoning
There are prior migrations that seeded flow templates (Version20260518151423.php, Version20260519173602.php). Let me compare down() behavior and pattern of company filtering to be fair and to follow the precedent.
Let me read a chunk of Version20260518151423 to see whether they iterate all companies and their down.
Vou comparar com a migration de seed anterior para ver o padrão usado (filtro por empresa, down(), transacional) e checar a documentação de database-changes.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 140, "file_path": "migrations/Version20260518151423.php", "start_line": 560}
Result
File: migrations/Version20260519173602.php (Total lines: 211)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-120
1|<?php
2|
3|declare(strict_types=1);
4|
5|namespace DoctrineMigrations;
6|
7|use Doctrine\DBAL\Schema\Schema;
8|use Doctrine\Migrations\AbstractMigration;
9|
10|final class Version20260519173602 extends AbstractMigration
11|{
12| private const SEED_KEY = '20260519173602_client_flow_default_template';
13|
14| public function getDescription(): string
15| {
16| return 'Seed idempotente do template default "Fluxo com o cliente - CRM + NPS com IA" com backfill das etapas default de CRM.';
17| }
18|
19| public function isTransactional(): bool
20| {
21| return false;
22| }
23|
24| public function up(Schema $schema): void
25| {
26| $productMap = $this->connection->fetchAllKeyValue('SELECT slug, id FROM products');
27| $crmId = (int) ($productMap['crm'] ?? 0);
28| $npsId = (int) ($productMap['nps-com-ia'] ?? 0);
29| if ($crmId <= 0 || $npsId <= 0) {
30| return;
31| }
32|
33| $companyIds = $this->connection->fetchFirstColumn('SELECT id FROM company');
34| foreach ($companyIds as $companyIdRaw) {
35| $companyId = (int) $companyIdRaw;
36|
37| $workflowId = (int) ($this->connection->fetchOne(
38| 'SELECT id FROM workflows WHERE company_id = :companyId AND slug = :slug LIMIT 1',
39| ['companyId' => $companyId, 'slug' => 'fluxo-com-o-cliente']
40| ) ?: 0);
41| if ($workflowId <= 0) {
42| continue;
43| }
44|
45| // Garante produtos ativos no workflow (idempotente).
46| $this->ensureWorkflowProduct($workflowId, $crmId, 0);
47| $this->ensureWorkflowProduct($workflowId, $npsId, 1);
48|
49| $existingTemplateId = (int) ($this->connection->fetchOne(
50| 'SELECT id FROM flow_templates
51| WHERE workflow_id = :workflowId
52| AND JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, \'$.seed_migration\')) = :seed
53| LIMIT 1',
54| ['workflowId' => $workflowId, 'seed' => self::SEED_KEY]
55| ) ?: 0);
56|
57| if ($existingTemplateId <= 0) {
58| $settings = json_encode([
59| 'seed_migration' => self::SEED_KEY,
60| 'orchestrator_defaults_applied' => false,
61| ], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE);
62|
63| $this->connection->executeStatement(
64| 'INSERT INTO flow_templates (workflow_id, company_id, name, description, is_active, settings, template_category, created_at, updated_at)
65| VALUES (:workflowId, :companyId, :name, :description, 1, :settings, :category, NOW(), NOW())',
66| [
67| 'workflowId' => $workflowId,
68| 'companyId' => $companyId,
69| 'name' => 'Fluxo com o cliente - CRM + NPS com IA',
70| 'description' => 'Template padrão do fluxo com o cliente com CRM e NPS com IA ativos.',
71| 'settings' => $settings,
72| 'category' => 'client_flow_default',
73| ]
74| );
75| $existingTemplateId = (int) $this->connection->lastInsertId();
76| }
77|
78| $this->ensureTemplateProduct($existingTemplateId, $crmId, 0);
79| $this->ensureTemplateProduct($existingTemplateId, $npsId, 1);
80| $this->ensureCrmDefaultStages($existingTemplateId, $crmId);
81| }
82| }
83|
84| public function down(Schema $schema): void
85| {
86| $templateIds = $this->connection->fetchFirstColumn(
87| 'SELECT id FROM flow_templates
88| WHERE JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, \'$.seed_migration\')) = :seed',
89| ['seed' => self::SEED_KEY]
90| );
91|
92| foreach ($templateIds as $templateIdRaw) {
93| $templateId = (int) $templateIdRaw;
94| if ($templateId <= 0) {
95| continue;
96| }
97|
98| $this->connection->executeStatement(
99| 'DELETE FROM flow_template_products WHERE flow_template_id = :templateId',
100| ['templateId' => $templateId]
101| );
102| $this->connection->executeStatement(
103| 'DELETE FROM flow_templates WHERE id = :templateId',
104| ['templateId' => $templateId]
105| );
106| }
107| }
108|
109| private function ensureWorkflowProduct(int $workflowId, int $productId, int $orderIndex): void
110| {
111| $exists = $this->connection->fetchOne(
112| 'SELECT id FROM workflow_products WHERE workflow_id = :workflowId AND product_id = :productId LIMIT 1',
113| ['workflowId' => $workflowId, 'productId' => $productId]
114| );
115|
116| if ($exists) {
117| $this->connection->executeStatement(
118| 'UPDATE workflow_products SET order_index = :orderIndex WHERE id = :id',
119| ['orderIndex' => $orderIndex, 'id' => (int) $exists]
120| );
file_read
Failed
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 120, "file_path": "migrations/Version20260519173602.php", "start_line": 1}
Request #7
deepseek-v4-flash
P:61.16K C:512 CR:59.65K CW:0
4815ms
Reasoning
So precedent migration Version20260519173602 also iterates all companies and down() deletes templates, so the new migration follows established pattern. So the down() concern and all-companies concern are not really novel issues compared to precedent... But the reviewer rules say focus on issues introduced in diff; if the pattern matches precedent, maybe mention only if particularly problematic. The new down() also deletes stages/automations/activities (needed because of FK) and leaves workflow/workflow_products orphan. Precedent did not create new workflows though. Since Version20260518151423 also seeds workflow? Let me check. Actually new migration creates a `workflows` row when none exists for a company. That makes down() leave orphan workflow rows created by migration. That is a moderate issue; down should also clean them or note irreversibility. But note: down removing templates may fail if flow instances reference the template (FK). Let me check how the precedent handled when templates have instances? It doesn't. It just deletes; presumably there is no FK constraint or FK has on delete cascade/set null. Let me check migrations for flow_instances.flow_template_id FK definition.
Let me search schema migration to see flow_templates / flow_instances table definitions and constraints. Search migrations for "flow_instances" create table or ALTER adding constraint flow_template_id.
Actually easier: check whether flow_instances table exists and its FK. Search "flow_instances" in migrations.
Vou verificar constraints entre `flow_instances` e `flow_templates` nas migrations de schema, e ler trechos do `AutomationExecutionService` sobre `executeNotify` para conferir como `member_name` é resolvido e como funciona o `system_sender`.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["migrations/"], "search_text": "flow_instances"}
Result
File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php
Match lines: 39
23| * Jornada Metahuman templates J1-J10, flow_instances J1-J10
148| // -- flow_instances ---------------------------------------------------
149| if (!$this->tableExists('flow_instances')) {
151| CREATE TABLE flow_instances (
177| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_instances ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS flow_template_id INT DEFAULT NULL');
178| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_instances ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS company_id INT DEFAULT NULL');
179| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_instances ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS flow_responsible_id INT DEFAULT NULL');
180| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_instances ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS name VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL DEFAULT \'Fluxo\'');
181| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_instances ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS business_key VARCHAR(255) DEFAULT NULL');
182| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_instances ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS process_instance_id VARCHAR(255) DEFAULT NULL');
183| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_instances ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS status VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL DEFAULT \'inactive\'');
184| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_instances ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS start_date DATETIME DEFAULT NULL');
185| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_instances ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS end_date DATETIME DEFAULT NULL');
186| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_instances ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS config JSON DEFAULT NULL');
187| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_instances ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS origin_product VARCHAR(50) DEFAULT NULL');
188| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_instances ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS origin_record_id INT DEFAULT NULL');
189| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_instances ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS origin_metadata JSON DEFAULT NULL');
190| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_instances ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS created_at DATETIME NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP');
191| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_instances ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS updated_at DATETIME NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP');
194| if (!$this->indexExists('flow_instances', 'IDX_FLOW_INSTANCE_TEMPLATE')) {
195| $c->executeStatement('CREATE INDEX IDX_FLOW_INSTANCE_TEMPLATE ON flow_instances (flow_template_id)');
197| if (!$this->indexExists('flow_instances', 'IDX_FLOW_INSTANCE_COMPANY')) {
198| $c->executeStatement('CREATE INDEX IDX_FLOW_INSTANCE_COMPANY ON flow_instances (company_id)');
200| if (!$this->indexExists('flow_instances', 'IDX_FLOW_INSTANCE_RESPONSIBLE')) {
201| $c->executeStatement('CREATE INDEX IDX_FLOW_INSTANCE_RESPONSIBLE ON flow_instances (flow_responsible_id)');
203| if (!$this->indexExists('flow_instances', 'IDX_FLOW_INSTANCE_STATUS')) {
204| $c->executeStatement('CREATE INDEX IDX_FLOW_INSTANCE_STATUS ON flow_instances (status)');
206| if (!$this->indexExists('flow_instances', 'UNIQ_FLOW_INSTANCE_BUSINESS_KEY')) {
207| $c->executeStatement('CREATE UNIQUE INDEX UNIQ_FLOW_INSTANCE_BUSINESS_KEY ON flow_instances (business_key)');
209| if (!$this->fkExists('flow_instances', 'FK_FLOW_INSTANCE_TEMPLATE')) {
210| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_instances ADD CONSTRAINT FK_FLOW_INSTANCE_TEMPLATE FOREIGN KEY (flow_template_id) REFERENCES flow_templates (id) ON DELETE CASCADE');
212| if (!$this->fkExists('flow_instances', 'FK_FLOW_INSTANCE_COMPANY')) {
213| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_instances ADD CONSTRAINT FK_FLOW_INSTANCE_COMPANY FOREIGN KEY (company_id) REFERENCES company (id) ON DELETE CASCADE');
215| if (!$this->fkExists('flow_instances', 'FK_FLOW_INSTANCE_RESPONSIBLE')) {
216| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_instances ADD CONSTRAINT FK_FLOW_INSTANCE_RESPONSIBLE FOREIGN KEY (flow_responsible_id) REFERENCES company_members (id) ON DELETE SET NULL');
826| 'SELECT id FROM flow_instances WHERE flow_template_id = :t AND company_id = :c LIMIT 1',
844| 'INSERT INTO flow_instances (flow_template_id, company_id, name, business_key, status, start_date, config, origin_product, origin_record_id, origin_metadata, created_at, updated_at)
885| 'SELECT fi.id, fi.company_id, fi.config FROM flow_instances fi
917| 'UPDATE flow_instances SET config = :cfg WHERE id = :id',
File: migrations/Version20260519203024.php
Match lines: 5
91| INNER JOIN flow_instances fi ON fi.id = fim.flow_instance_id
112| SELECT fi.id FROM flow_instances fi WHERE fi.flow_template_id IN {$tpl}
128| INNER JOIN flow_instances fi ON fi.id = fim.flow_instance_id
134| if ($this->tableExists('flow_instances')) {
136| "DELETE FROM flow_instances WHERE flow_template_id IN {$tpl}",
File: migrations/Version20260701120000_WorkflowEventLog.php
Match lines: 1
45| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE workflow_event_log ADD CONSTRAINT FK_wel_flow_instance FOREIGN KEY (flow_instance_id) REFERENCES flow_instances (id) ON DELETE RESTRICT');
File: migrations/Version20260701140000_WorkflowApprovalObservation.php
Match lines: 1
54| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE workflow_approval_observation ADD CONSTRAINT FK_wao_flow_instance FOREIGN KEY (flow_instance_id) REFERENCES flow_instances (id) ON DELETE CASCADE');
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 13970, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 13820}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15468)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 13820-13970
13820|
13821| // Se ainda está vazio, usar mensagem padrão
13822| if (empty($chatBody)) {
13823| $chatBody = "Você tem uma nova notificação.";
13824| }
13825|
13826| error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] Mensagem preparada - Subject: {$subject}, Body length: " . strlen($chatBody));
13827|
13828| // Enviar para cada usuário
13829| foreach ($users as $user) {
13830| error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] Enviando para user ID: " . $user->getId() . " (" . $user->getEmail() . "), recipientType: " . $recipientType);
13831|
13832| $result = $this->sendChatNotification($user, $subject, $chatBody, $member, $recipientType, $config);
13833|
13834| error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] Resultado: " . json_encode($result));
13835|
13836| if ($result['sent'] ?? false) {
13837| $chatUserIds[] = $user->getId();
13838| }
13839| }
13840|
13841| if (!empty($chatUserIds)) {
13842| $this->log('info', '💬 Mensagens no chat enviadas automaticamente', [
13843| 'recipientType' => $recipientType,
13844| 'userIds' => $chatUserIds,
13845| 'count' => count($chatUserIds)
13846| ]);
13847| error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] ✅ SUCESSO - Enviado para " . count($chatUserIds) . " usuário(s)");
13848| }
13849|
13850| } catch (\Exception $e) {
13851| error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] ❌ ERRO: " . $e->getMessage());
13852| error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] Stack: " . $e->getTraceAsString());
13853|
13854| $this->log('error', 'Erro ao enviar mensagens no chat para tipo de destinatário', [
13855| 'recipientType' => $recipientType,
13856| 'error' => $e->getMessage()
13857| ]);
13858| }
13859|
13860| error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] FIM - Total enviado: " . count($chatUserIds));
13861|
13862| return $chatUserIds;
13863| }
13864|
13865| /**
13866| * Envia mensagem no chat - canal compartilhado OU mensagem direta
13867| *
13868| * - employee/collaborator/candidate → Mensagem DIRETA do manager para o usuário
13869| * - flow_responsible/responsible/manager/outros → Canal "Suporte Meta" compartilhado
13870| *
13871| * @param User $user Destinatário da mensagem
13872| * @param string $title Título/assunto
13873| * @param string $message Corpo da mensagem
13874| * @param FlowInstanceMember|null $member Membro do fluxo (para contexto)
13875| * @param string|null $recipientType Tipo de destinatário (employee, flow_responsible, etc.)
13876| * @return array ['sent' => bool, 'conversationId' => int|null, 'messageId' => int|null]
13877| */
13878| private function sendChatNotification(User $user, string $title, string $message, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, ?string $recipientType = null, array $config = []): array
13879| {
13880| try {
13881| // 1. Obter a empresa do membro/usuário
13882| $company = null;
13883| if ($member && $member->getFlowInstance()) {
13884| $company = $member->getFlowInstance()->getCompany();
13885| }
13886|
13887| if (!$company) {
13888| // Tentar obter empresa do usuário via CompanyMembers
13889| $companyMember = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\CompanyMembers::class)
13890| ->findOneBy(['user' => $user]);
13891| if ($companyMember) {
13892| $company = $companyMember->getCompany();
13893| }
13894| }
13895|
13896| if (!$company) {
13897| $this->log('warning', 'Não foi possível determinar empresa para envio de chat', [
13898| 'userId' => $user->getId()
13899| ]);
13900| return ['sent' => false, 'error' => 'Empresa não encontrada'];
13901| }
13902|
13903| // 2. Determinar canal:
13904| // - CRM responsibles (record_owner/board_owner) must receive direct messages
13905| // - employee/collaborator/candidate already use direct mode
13906| // - request_notification actions (com approve_url/reject_url) também devem ser mensagens diretas,
13907| // independente do recipient_type (ex.: direct_manager, company_member no assessment)
13908| $isRequestNotification = !empty($config['approve_url']) || !empty($config['reject_url']);
13909| // Notificações sistêmicas são geradas pela assistente "Adriana",
13910| // não por um gestor específico: a mensagem no chat deve sair sem remetente
13911| // (userId = null), que o front renderiza como Adriana/Sistema.
13912| $isSystemSender = filter_var($config['system_sender'] ?? false, FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN)
13913| || ($member instanceof FlowInstanceMember
13914| && $member->getSourceType() === PayrollClosingBpmnService::SOURCE_TYPE);
13915| // 'direct' is used by sendChatToSpecificEmails when the user was already resolved —
13916| // always send a personal direct message in that case.
13917| // training_group_responsible / responsible also get direct messages.
13918| $isDirectMessage = $isRequestNotification
13919| || in_array($recipientType, [
13920| 'employee', 'collaborator', 'candidate',
13921| 'record_owner', 'board_owner',
13922| 'direct_manager', 'company_member', 'flow_responsible',
13923| 'responsible', 'training_group_responsible',
13924| 'direct',
13925| ], true);
13926|
13927| $fullMessage = "📢 **{$title}**\n\n{$message}";
13928|
13929| // Sistema: o remetente é a própria Adriana, então a notificação deve cair na
13930| // conversa exclusiva da Adriana (ai_assistant) do destinatário — e não numa conversa
13931| // "individual" entre gestores. Isso também evita o caso em que, quando destinatário e
13932| // gestor da empresa são o mesmo usuário, a busca por conversa individual acabava
13933| // recaindo na conversa de outra pessoa.
13934| if ($isSystemSender) {
13935| $assistantConversation = $this->getOrCreateAssistantConversation($user);
13936| if (!$assistantConversation) {
13937| return ['sent' => false, 'error' => 'Não foi possível obter a conversa da Adriana'];
13938| }
13939|
13940| $this->initializeChatUnreadBaseline($assistantConversation, $user);
13941|
13942| $chatMessage = new \App\Entity\ChatMessage();
13943| $chatMessage->setConversationId($assistantConversation->getId());
13944| $chatMessage->setConversation($assistantConversation);
13945| $chatMessage->setUserId(null); // Mensagem da Adriana em conversa ai_assistant
13946| $chatMessage->setMessage($fullMessage);
13947| $chatMessage->setTimestamp(new \DateTime());
13948| $chatMessage->setIsInitialMessage(false);
13949|
13950| $this->entityManager->persist($chatMessage);
13951| $this->entityManager->flush();
13952|
13953| return [
13954| 'sent' => true,
13955| 'conversationId' => $assistantConversation->getId(),
13956| 'messageId' => $chatMessage->getId()
13957| ];
13958| }
13959|
13960| if ($isDirectMessage) {
13961| // ===== MENSAGEM DIRETA: Manager → Employee =====
13962| error_log("💬 [sendChatNotification] Modo DIRETO para recipientType={$recipientType}");
13963|
13964| // Buscar ROLE_MANAGER da empresa
13965| $adminUser = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\User::class)
13966| ->createQueryBuilder('u')
13967| ->where('u.company = :company')
13968| ->andWhere('u.roles LIKE :role')
13969| ->setParameter('company', $company)
13970| ->setParameter('role', '%ROLE_MANAGER%')
Request #8
deepseek-v4-flash
P:65.39K C:578 CR:61.57K CW:0
4934ms
Reasoning
Important: `flow_instances.flow_template_id` FK is `ON DELETE CASCADE`. So down() deleting a template would cascade delete flow instances — i.e., rollback of the migration would delete flow instances created from the template (running offboardings!). But the down is only executed during rollback; if instances exist, they'd be removed with cascade. That is a data-loss issue in the down path. Though precedent migrations also just delete templates (down()). Yet new migration creates template by design intended to be used in production. If they later roll back this migration, cascade deletion of flow_instances would delete actual business processes. This is a real concern: down() should not delete templates that have instances, or should set inactive. Medium.
Now on the execution of notify: in executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft they call `$this->executeNotify([...])`. Wait, but the diff at lines 13903-13926 is in `sendChatNotification`, which is called by executeNotify after resolving users. And they pass config array to sendChatNotification? Let me check executeNotify passes config through to sendChatNotification. Let's find executeNotify's definition and whether config contains system_sender passed down to sendChatNotification. Probably yes.
Now, important: does the message replace `{{member_name}}`? Search for how executeNotify renders message: perhaps uses a twig template where variables are resolved. Let me find the executeNotify method to see how member_name is resolved and where member comes from (recipient's member or automation member). The notification's context includes 'member_id' => company member id and message contains '{{member_name}}'. Where does member_name come from? Possibly from `$member` (the automation FlowInstanceMember) or from context 'member_id'. Let's read executeNotify and message rendering code.
Actually, let's search for `function executeNotify` and `member_name` within AutomationExecutionService.
Vou localizar `executeNotify`, como a mensagem `{{member_name}}` é renderizada e se a configuração chega até `sendChatNotification` com `system_sender`.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "function executeNotify"}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 2 6896| private function executeNotifyEsocialWorkerData(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array 6930| private function executeNotify(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "member_name"}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 14
2544| // notifyConfig com {{member_name}} literal porque a ponte lia message/title sem replace).
2657| $hasRecordPlaceholder = str_contains($message, '{{member_name}}') || str_contains($message, '{{record_name}}');
2661| // Step 1 — inject {{member_name}} right after "O registro" when missing.
2663| $message = preg_replace('/\bO registro\b(?!\s*\{\{)/u', 'O registro {{member_name}}', $message, 1) ?: $message;
6164| 'member_name' => '',
6277| $values['member_name'] = $fullName;
6914| $message = 'O colaborador {{member_name}} precisa ter os dados de trabalhador e remuneração preenchidos para o eSocial.';
6915| $messageHtml = '<p>O colaborador {{member_name}} precisa ter os dados de trabalhador e remuneração preenchidos para o eSocial.</p>';
6978| // config['title'] here, placeholders like {{member_name}} inside the automation title stay literal.
13323| '{{member_name}}' => '',
13368| $contextRecordName = trim((string) ($context['record_name'] ?? $context['member_name'] ?? ''));
13374| $replacements['{{member_name}}'] = $fullName;
15047| 'message' => 'O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding. Abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar os detalhes.',
15048| 'message_html' => '<p>O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding.</p><p style="margin-top:1.25rem;"><a href="' . htmlspecialchars($reviewUrl, ENT_QUOTES, 'UTF-8') . '" style="display:inline-block;background-color:#277591;color:#ffffff;padding:10px 16px;border-radius:6px;font-weight:bold;text-decoration:none;">Revisar desligamento eSocial</a></p>',
Request #9
deepseek-v4-flash
P:66.57K C:139 CR:65.92K CW:0
1778ms
Reasoning
Let me read executeNotify (lines 6930-7060) to understand how it determines recipient and whether config is forwarded to chat and how the message is rendered (with member name). Let me read around 6930-7100.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 7160, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 6930}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15468)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 6930-7160
6930| private function executeNotify(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
6931| {
6932| $recipients = $config['recipients'] ?? [];
6933| $recipientType = $config['to'] ?? $config['recipient'] ?? null;
6934| $title = $config['title'] ?? $config['subject'] ?? null;
6935| $message = $config['message'] ?? $config['body'] ?? null;
6936| $messageHtml = $config['message_html'] ?? null;
6937| $type = $config['type'] ?? 'info';
6938| $templateSlug = $config['template'] ?? null;
6939|
6940| // Se recipients está vazio mas há 'to' ou 'recipient', usar como recipient único
6941| if (empty($recipients) && $recipientType) {
6942| $recipients = [$recipientType];
6943| }
6944|
6945| // Fallback: se não há destinatários definidos, enviar para responsável do fluxo
6946| if (empty($recipients)) {
6947| error_log("[NOTIFY] ⚠️ Nenhum destinatário definido (to/recipient/recipients vazios) - usando fallback 'flow_responsible'");
6948| $recipientType = 'flow_responsible';
6949| $recipients = ['flow_responsible'];
6950| }
6951|
6952| // 🎯 GERAR MENSAGEM AUTOMÁTICA se não foi fornecida
6953| if (empty($title) || empty($message)) {
6954| $autoMessage = $this->generateAutoNotificationMessage($member, $recipientType, $context);
6955| $title = $title ?: $autoMessage['title'];
6956| $message = $message ?: $autoMessage['message'];
6957| }
6958|
6959| $title = $this->replaceVariables($title, $member, $context);
6960| $message = $this->replaceVariables($message, $member, $context);
6961| if ($messageHtml !== null && $messageHtml !== '') {
6962| $messageHtml = $this->replaceVariables($messageHtml, $member, $context);
6963| } else {
6964| $messageHtml = null;
6965| }
6966|
6967| $emailTemplateBody = ($messageHtml !== null && $messageHtml !== '') ? $messageHtml : $message;
6968|
6969| $createdNotifications = [];
6970| $emailsSent = [];
6971| $chatMessagesSent = [];
6972|
6973| foreach ($recipients as $recipientType) {
6974| // Merge context with action config so recipient resolvers can reuse action-specific keys.
6975| // Example: manager_permission_products, role_id, company_member_id.
6976| // title/subject must be the already-replaced strings: CompanySenderGenerator renders
6977| // the DB template subject as Twig (e.g. "{{ title }} – {{ companyName }}"). If we keep
6978| // config['title'] here, placeholders like {{member_name}} inside the automation title stay literal.
6979| $recipientContext = array_merge($context, $config, [
6980| 'message' => $emailTemplateBody,
6981| 'body' => $emailTemplateBody,
6982| 'title' => $title,
6983| 'subject' => $title,
6984| ]);
6985| $users = $this->resolveRecipients($recipientType, $member, $recipientContext);
6986|
6987| foreach ($users as $user) {
6988| // 1️⃣ NOTIFICAÇÃO IN-APP (badge/popup)
6989| try {
6990| $notification = new \App\Entity\NotificationSpecialist();
6991| $notification->setUser($user);
6992| $notification->setTitle($title);
6993| $notification->setMessage($message);
6994| $notification->setIsRead(false);
6995| $notification->setCreatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
6996|
6997| $this->entityManager->persist($notification);
6998| $createdNotifications[] = $user->getId();
6999|
7000| if ($this->notificationsCenterService instanceof NotificationsCenterService) {
7001| $notificationType = \App\Entity\NotificationsCenter::TYPE_REQUEST;
7002| if (str_contains((string) $templateSlug, 'bpm-notification') || $type === 'info') {
7003| $notificationType = \App\Entity\NotificationsCenter::TYPE_SYSTEM;
7004| }
7005| $this->notificationsCenterService->createNotification(
7006| recipient: $user,
7007| hub: 'Hub de Operações',
7008| product: 'Workflow BPM',
7009| content: trim($title . ': ' . $message),
7010| type: $notificationType,
7011| sender: null,
7012| buttonUrl: '/chat?adriana=1',
7013| flush: false
7014| );
7015| }
7016|
7017| $this->log('info', '✅ Notificação in-app criada', [
7018| 'userId' => $user->getId(),
7019| 'title' => $title
7020| ]);
7021| } catch (\Exception $e) {
7022| $this->log('error', 'Erro ao criar notificação in-app', ['error' => $e->getMessage()]);
7023| }
7024|
7025| // 2️⃣ EMAIL (se houver template ou corpo)
7026| // NOTA: executeSendEmail() JÁ envia mensagem no chat automaticamente
7027| // conforme documentação (Email + Chat em um único canal)
7028| if ($templateSlug || !empty($emailTemplateBody)) {
7029| try {
7030| $emailConfig = [
7031| 'to' => $user->getEmail(),
7032| 'subject' => $title,
7033| 'body' => $emailTemplateBody,
7034| 'template' => $templateSlug,
7035| '_resolved_recipient_type' => $recipientType,
7036| // Keep request decision links when routing through executeSendEmail;
7037| // chat action buttons depend on these URLs.
7038| 'approve_url' => $config['approve_url'] ?? null,
7039| 'reject_url' => $config['reject_url'] ?? null,
7040| 'approve_button_text' => $config['approve_button_text'] ?? null,
7041| 'reject_button_text' => $config['reject_button_text'] ?? null,
7042| 'request_type_label' => $config['request_type_label'] ?? null,
7043| 'record_name' => $config['record_name'] ?? null,
7044| 'system_sender' => $config['system_sender'] ?? null,
7045| ];
7046| if (filter_var($config['skip_auto_email_template'] ?? false, FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN)) {
7047| $emailConfig['skip_auto_email_template'] = true;
7048| }
7049|
7050| $emailResult = $this->executeSendEmail($emailConfig, $member, $recipientContext);
7051|
7052| if ($emailResult['sent'] ?? false) {
7053| $emailsSent[] = $user->getEmail();
7054| // Contabilizar mensagens de chat enviadas automaticamente pelo executeSendEmail
7055| if (isset($emailResult['chatMessagesSent']) && $emailResult['chatMessagesSent'] > 0) {
7056| $chatMessagesSent = array_merge($chatMessagesSent, $emailResult['chatUserIds'] ?? []);
7057| }
7058| $this->log('info', '✅ Email enviado via notificação (chat incluído automaticamente)', [
7059| 'to' => $user->getEmail(),
7060| 'subject' => $title
7061| ]);
7062| }
7063| } catch (\Exception $e) {
7064| $this->log('error', 'Erro ao enviar email via notificação', [
7065| 'error' => $e->getMessage(),
7066| 'to' => $user->getEmail()
7067| ]);
7068| }
7069| }
7070| }
7071| }
7072|
7073| $this->entityManager->flush();
7074|
7075| return [
7076| 'notified' => count($createdNotifications),
7077| 'userIds' => $createdNotifications,
7078| 'emailsSent' => count($emailsSent),
7079| 'emails' => $emailsSent,
7080| 'chatMessagesSent' => count($chatMessagesSent),
7081| 'chatUserIds' => $chatMessagesSent
7082| ];
7083| }
7084|
7085| /**
7086| * Resolve financial-trail move destination by declarative stage key (YAML target_stage_key).
7087| * Isolated from payroll: only used when sourceType is financial_trail_record.
7088| */
7089| private function resolveFinancialMoveStageByKey(
7090| FlowInstanceMember $member,
7091| string $moduleSlug,
7092| string $stageKey,
7093| ): ?FlowStage {
7094| $stageKey = trim($stageKey);
7095| $moduleSlug = trim($moduleSlug);
7096| if ($stageKey === '' || $moduleSlug === '' || !FinancialFlowModuleStructure::isFinancialModuleSlug($moduleSlug)) {
7097| return null;
7098| }
7099|
7100| $template = $member->getCurrentStage()?->getFlowTemplate()
7101| ?? $member->getFlowInstance()?->getFlowTemplate();
7102| if (!$template instanceof FlowTemplate) {
7103| return null;
7104| }
7105|
7106| $resolvedName = null;
7107| $definition = FinancialFlowModuleStructure::getModuleDefinition($moduleSlug);
7108| foreach (($definition['stages'] ?? []) as $stageDef) {
7109| if (!is_array($stageDef)) {
7110| continue;
7111| }
7112| if ((string) ($stageDef['key'] ?? '') === $stageKey) {
7113| $resolvedName = trim((string) ($stageDef['name'] ?? ''));
7114| break;
7115| }
7116| }
7117| if ($resolvedName === null || $resolvedName === '') {
7118| return null;
7119| }
7120|
7121| foreach ($template->getStages() as $stage) {
7122| if (!$stage instanceof FlowStage) {
7123| continue;
7124| }
7125| if ((string) ($stage->getProduct()?->getSlug() ?? '') !== $moduleSlug) {
7126| continue;
7127| }
7128| if (trim((string) $stage->getName()) === $resolvedName) {
7129| return $stage;
7130| }
7131| }
7132|
7133| return null;
7134| }
7135|
7136| /**
7137| * Resolve a etapa de destino de um move de folha/eSocial a partir de um nome
7138| * ou label (formato "Produto > Etapa"), dentro do template do membro.
7139| *
7140| * Escopado ao fluxo de folha: usado apenas quando o move é payroll/esocial,
7141| * para tolerar stageId obsoleto (etapas recriadas) sem afetar outros produtos.
7142| */
7143| private function resolvePayrollMoveStageByLabel(FlowInstanceMember $member, string $rawLabel): ?FlowStage
7144| {
7145| $rawLabel = trim($rawLabel);
7146| if ($rawLabel === '') {
7147| return null;
7148| }
7149|
7150| $template = $member->getCurrentStage()?->getFlowTemplate();
7151| if (!$template) {
7152| return null;
7153| }
7154|
7155| $preferredProduct = '';
7156| $stageName = $rawLabel;
7157| if (str_contains($rawLabel, '>')) {
7158| $parts = array_values(array_filter(array_map('trim', explode('>', $rawLabel)), static fn ($p) => $p !== ''));
7159| if ($parts !== []) {
7160| $stageName = (string) array_pop($parts);
Request #10
deepseek-v4-flash
P:69.81K C:580 CR:66.69K CW:0
4749ms
Reasoning
Important observation: `executeNotify` sends email when `$templateSlug || !empty($emailTemplateBody)`. In the handler, they pass `message_html`, so `$emailTemplateBody` is non-empty → email is sent to the user (the responsible) if the user has an email. But the email path uses `executeSendEmail`, which also includes chat; and the notification center has button URL `/chat?adriana=1`. However, the emailConfig `system_sender` added. But `executeSendEmail` → presumably triggers chat send as part of email sending. Note the diff says: "A notificação passa a ser enviada como Adriana, sem expor link cru no texto." Actually the message_html includes the review link `<a href=...>Revisar desligamento eSocial</a>`.
Wait, they say the link shouldn't be exposed as raw text but button in email. And "O botão 'ver detalhes' direciona para o chat com a Adriana" - this is the in-app notification button `/chat?adriana=1`.
Now: Does `executeNotify` for the `company_member` recipient with `message_html` path lead to `executeSendEmail` which sends both email and chat; in chat path, system_sender true → sends message to Adriana conversation. Good.
But wait: for the chat in-app notification (NotificationSpecialist), the notification says system sender. The message inside the chat is from Adriana (userId null). Good.
Now there's the bug that `$templateSlug` is null and `$emailTemplateBody` non-empty → email gets sent. So the responsible receives an email containing the review URL button. That's by design.
Let me now double-check `replaceVariables` — `{{member_name}}` in the message will be replaced with the company member's full name (resolved from context member_id?) Because the automation member is a FlowInstanceMember, whose name might not equal the offboarding employee. In the new notify call, `$context` merged with `member_id` = the company member (employee). Let me look at `replaceVariables` at 13323 to see how member_name is derived.
Vou ver como `replaceVariables` resolve `{{member_name}}` e confirmar o papel de `member_id` no contexto.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 13410, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 13300}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15468)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 13300-13410
13300| $users[] = $user;
13301| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found user by ID: " . $user->getEmail());
13302| }
13303| } else {
13304| error_log("⚠️ [resolveRecipients] Tipo de destinatário desconhecido: {$recipientType}");
13305| }
13306| }
13307|
13308| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Total de usuários encontrados: " . count($users));
13309|
13310| return $users;
13311| }
13312|
13313| /**
13314| * Substitui variáveis em uma string
13315| */
13316| private function replaceVariables(string $text, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): string
13317| {
13318| $completionPctFormatted = isset($context['completionPercentage'])
13319| ? number_format((float) $context['completionPercentage'], 0) . '%'
13320| : '';
13321|
13322| $replacements = [
13323| '{{member_name}}' => '',
13324| '{{member_email}}' => '',
13325| '{{stage_name}}' => '',
13326| '{{product_name}}' => '',
13327| '{{company_name}}' => '',
13328| '{{flow_instance_id}}' => '',
13329| '{{flow_instance_name}}' => '',
13330| '{{flow_template_name}}' => '',
13331| '{{kanban_card_title}}' => '',
13332| '{{completion_percentage}}' => $completionPctFormatted,
13333| '{{current_date}}' => (new \DateTime())->format('d/m/Y'),
13334| '{{current_time}}' => (new \DateTime())->format('H:i'),
13335| '{{assessment360_questionnaire_url}}' => '',
13336| '{{assessment360_questionnaire_button_html}}' => '',
13337| ];
13338|
13339| if ($member) {
13340| $user = $member->getUser();
13341| $companyMemberDirect = $member->getCompanyMember();
13342| $profile = $user?->getProfile();
13343|
13344| $fullName = '';
13345| if ($profile) {
13346| $fullName = trim($profile->getFirstName() . ' ' . $profile->getLastName());
13347| }
13348| if (empty($fullName) && $user) {
13349| $fullName = $user->getEmail() ?? '';
13350| }
13351| if (empty($fullName) && $companyMemberDirect) {
13352| $fullName = trim($companyMemberDirect->getFirstName() . ' ' . $companyMemberDirect->getLastName());
13353| if (empty($fullName)) {
13354| $fullName = $companyMemberDirect->getEmail() ?? '';
13355| }
13356| }
13357| if (empty($fullName)) {
13358| $crmEntity = $this->resolveCrmRecordEntityFromFlowMember($member);
13359| if ($crmEntity !== null) {
13360| if (method_exists($crmEntity, 'getNameLead')) {
13361| $fullName = trim((string) (($crmEntity->getNameLead() ?? '') . ' ' . ($crmEntity->getSurnameLead() ?? '')));
13362| } elseif (method_exists($crmEntity, 'getName')) {
13363| $fullName = trim((string) ($crmEntity->getName() ?? ''));
13364| }
13365| }
13366| }
13367| if (empty($fullName)) {
13368| $contextRecordName = trim((string) ($context['record_name'] ?? $context['member_name'] ?? ''));
13369| $fullName = $contextRecordName !== '' ? $contextRecordName : $this->resolveMemberDisplayName($member);
13370| }
13371|
13372| $memberEmail = $user?->getEmail() ?? $companyMemberDirect?->getEmail() ?? '';
13373|
13374| $replacements['{{member_name}}'] = $fullName;
13375| $replacements['{{member_email}}'] = $memberEmail;
13376|
13377| if ($member->getCurrentStage()) {
13378| $replacements['{{stage_name}}'] = $member->getCurrentStage()->getName();
13379| }
13380|
13381| if ($member->getProduct()) {
13382| $replacements['{{product_name}}'] = $member->getProduct()->getName();
13383| }
13384|
13385| $flowInstance = $member->getFlowInstance();
13386| if ($flowInstance) {
13387| $replacements['{{flow_instance_id}}'] = (string) $flowInstance->getId();
13388| $replacements['{{flow_instance_name}}'] = (string) ($flowInstance->getName() ?? '');
13389| $flowTemplate = $flowInstance->getFlowTemplate();
13390| if ($flowTemplate) {
13391| $replacements['{{flow_template_name}}'] = (string) $flowTemplate->getName();
13392| }
13393| if ($flowInstance->getCompany()) {
13394| $replacements['{{company_name}}'] = $flowInstance->getCompany()->getName();
13395| }
13396| }
13397| $replacements['{{kanban_card_title}}'] = $this->resolveFlowKanbanCardTitle($member);
13398|
13399| $a360QuestionnaireUrl = $this->resolveAssessment360BpmQuestionnaireUrl($member);
13400| $replacements['{{assessment360_questionnaire_url}}'] = $a360QuestionnaireUrl;
13401| $replacements['{{assessment360_questionnaire_button_html}}'] = $this->buildAssessment360QuestionnaireButtonHtml($a360QuestionnaireUrl);
13402| }
13403|
13404| // Adicionar variáveis do contexto
13405| foreach ($context as $key => $value) {
13406| if (is_scalar($value)) {
13407| $replacements['{{' . $key . '}}'] = $value;
13408| }
13409| }
13410|
Request #11
deepseek-v4-flash
P:71.94K C:756 CR:70.27K CW:0
6329ms
Reasoning
Interesting: `{{member_name}}` resolution:
1. If member exists, resolves from member->getUser()->getProfile() first (i.e., the FlowInstanceMember's user, NOT the offboarding employee). For an offboarding flow member, `getUser()` probably returns the manager/flow responsible's user or the employee? Actually FlowInstanceMember represents a member in the flow (a person added to the flow). In offboarding context, member is the offboarding employee? Let's think: In the flow, "member" = a person in the flow (employee being offboarded)? Offboarding flows: each flow instance = an offboarding for one employee? Or instance = the flow run and members are participants? Hmm.
Actually earlier, in the flow they talk about adding a colaborador to an offboarding instance and moving the member to next stage. `member->getCompanyMember()` - the FlowInstanceMember might directly reference the offboarding employee via getCompanyMember? Not sure. But the code in the handler used `findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember($member)` which maps the FlowInstanceMember to OffboardingMember entity. Then notification passes member_id = employee company member id. But replaceVariables for `{{member_name}}` uses $member (the FlowInstanceMember) to resolve member_name from the member->getUser(). If the FlowInstanceMember's user is the employee... Actually in offboarding, when the employee is invited, a user may be created. Hmm. Possibly the member in offboarding flow corresponds to the employee (the offboardingMember) with `getUser()` being employee's user. If so `{{member_name}}` is right.
Given `resolveMemberDisplayName($member)` fallback and `$context['member_name']`, also context key member_name would override via the generic context loop: `{{member_name}}` appears in context? They didn't add member_name to context. So the name shown is whatever replaceVariables resolves.
This is not clearly a bug without knowing FlowInstanceMember semantics. Skip.
Now let me check what the old `$isPayrollSystemSender` logic was: previously when the FlowInstanceMember's sourceType is payroll, all notifications in that flow went to the assistant conversation. Now with system_sender flag, other flows can. Also, `executeNotify` passes `system_sender` in config down to emailConfig, and the emailConfig merge into recipientContext includes 'system_sender' => true; sendChatNotification receives config with system_sender true (via `$config` param presumably the recipientContext or email config). OK.
But wait: for in-app chat send within `executeSendEmail`, the `system_sender` flag must reach `sendChatNotification`. Let's check executeSendEmail to verify config forwarding. Search for `system_sender` usage.
Vou verificar se `system_sender` realmente chega a `sendChatNotification` pelo caminho de email/chat e conferir onde mais a flag é lida.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "system_sender"}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 3 7044| 'system_sender' => $config['system_sender'] ?? null, 13912| $isSystemSender = filter_var($config['system_sender'] ?? false, FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN) 15049| 'system_sender' => true,
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/"], "search_text": "function findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember"}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 1 15421| private function findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember(FlowInstanceMember $member): ?\App\Entity\OffboardingMember
Request #12
deepseek-v4-flash
P:72.84K C:239 CR:72.58K CW:0
2643ms
Reasoning
`system_sender` is set only in email config at 7044 (inside executeNotify), and read at 13912 in sendChatNotification (config param). Need to confirm `executeSendEmail` forwards config['system_sender'] to sendChatNotification. Let me trace executeSendEmail's chat send path. It's a big method. Let's search for `sendChatNotification(` calls and where config used.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "sendChatNotification("}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 3 13775| $result = $this->sendChatNotification($user, $subject, $chatBody, $member, 'direct', $config); 13832| $result = $this->sendChatNotification($user, $subject, $chatBody, $member, $recipientType, $config); 13878| private function sendChatNotification(User $user, string $title, string $message, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, ?string $recipientType = null, array $config = []): array
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 15460, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 15410}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15468)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 15410-15460
15410| ];
15411|
15412| } catch (\Exception $e) {
15413| error_log("[AUTOMATION] ❌ delay_platform_access_removal error: " . $e->getMessage());
15414| return ['success' => false, 'error' => $e->getMessage()];
15415| }
15416| }
15417|
15418| /**
15419| * Busca o OffboardingMember correspondente a um FlowInstanceMember
15420| */
15421| private function findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember(FlowInstanceMember $member): ?\App\Entity\OffboardingMember
15422| {
15423| $sourceId = $member->getSourceId();
15424| $user = $member->getUser();
15425|
15426| // PRIORIDADE 1: Buscar pelo offboardingMemberId no activities_progress
15427| $activitiesProgress = $member->getActivitiesProgress() ?? [];
15428| if (!empty($activitiesProgress['offboardingMemberId'])) {
15429| $omId = (int) $activitiesProgress['offboardingMemberId'];
15430| $offboardingMember = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\OffboardingMember::class)->find($omId);
15431| if ($offboardingMember) {
15432| error_log("[AUTOMATION] findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember: Encontrado via activities_progress.offboardingMemberId = {$omId}");
15433| return $offboardingMember;
15434| }
15435| }
15436|
15437| // FALLBACK: Busca tradicional por offboarding + companyMember
15438| if (!$sourceId || !$user) {
15439| return null;
15440| }
15441|
15442| // Buscar o offboarding
15443| $offboarding = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\Offboarding::class)->find($sourceId);
15444| if (!$offboarding) {
15445| return null;
15446| }
15447|
15448| // Buscar company_member do user
15449| $company = $offboarding->getCompany();
15450| $companyMember = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\CompanyMembers::class)
15451| ->findOneBy(['user' => $user, 'company' => $company]);
15452|
15453| if (!$companyMember) {
15454| return null;
15455| }
15456|
15457| // Buscar offboarding_member
15458| $offboardingMember = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\OffboardingMember::class)
15459| ->findOneBy(['offboarding' => $offboarding, 'companyMember' => $companyMember]);
15460|
Request #13
deepseek-v4-flash
P:73.92K C:204 CR:72.96K CW:0
2293ms
Reasoning
Now let's trace how sendChatNotification receives `$config` in the offboarding notify path. executeNotify calls resolveRecipients then creates in-app NotificationSpecialist; the email path goes via executeSendEmail which presumably itself sends chat. Let me find executeSendEmail's chat send call. Search `sendChatForRecipientType(` which calls sendChatNotification with config from recipient. The chat sending from email uses `sendChatForRecipientType` (at 13775/13832). Where is that called from executeSendEmail? Let me search callers of sendChatForRecipientType.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "sendChatForRecipientType("}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 3 6077| $chatMessagesSent = $this->sendChatForRecipientType($originalRecipientType, $member, $subject, $chatBody, $values, $config); 6130| $chatMessagesSent = $this->sendChatForRecipientType($originalRecipientType, $member, $subject, $body, [], $config); 13784| private function sendChatForRecipientType(
Request #14
deepseek-v4-flash
P:74.25K C:155 CR:74.11K CW:0
1931ms
Reasoning
Let me read executeSendEmail region around 6000-6160 to see the config passed and whether system_sender is preserved (they merge recipientContext into config?). We saw at 6077 `$config` passed. Need to see how $config built there. Let me read 6000-6160.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 6160, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 5980}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15468)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 5980-6160
5980| // $originalRecipientType captura tanto config['to'] quanto config['recipient']
5981| $skipAutoTemplate = filter_var($config['skip_auto_email_template'] ?? false, FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN);
5982| if (!$templateSlug && !$skipAutoTemplate && $originalRecipientType && $member) {
5983| $templateSlug = $this->resolveAutoTemplateSlug($member, $originalRecipientType, $context);
5984| error_log('[EMAIL DEBUG] Auto-resolved templateSlug: ' . ($templateSlug ?? 'NULL'));
5985| }
5986|
5987| // Normalizar $to para sempre ser um array
5988| $recipients = is_array($to) ? $to : [$to];
5989| $sentCount = 0;
5990| $errors = [];
5991| $chatMessagesSent = [];
5992|
5993| error_log('[EMAIL DEBUG] Recipients array: ' . json_encode($recipients));
5994| error_log('[EMAIL DEBUG] CompanySenderGenerator available: ' . ($this->companySenderGenerator ? 'YES' : 'NO'));
5995|
5996| // Use CompanySenderGenerator when template slug is set
5997| if ($templateSlug && $this->companySenderGenerator && $member) {
5998| error_log('[EMAIL DEBUG] Trying to use CompanySenderGenerator...');
5999| $flowInstance = $member->getFlowInstance();
6000| error_log('[EMAIL DEBUG] FlowInstance: ' . ($flowInstance ? 'EXISTS (ID=' . $flowInstance->getId() . ')' : 'NULL'));
6001|
6002| if ($flowInstance && $flowInstance->getCompany()) {
6003| $company = $flowInstance->getCompany();
6004| error_log('[EMAIL DEBUG] Company: ' . $company->getName() . ' (ID=' . $company->getId() . ')');
6005| $values = $this->buildEmailTemplateValues($member, $recipientContext);
6006| $isUnifiedBpmRequestTemplate = $templateSlug === 'bpm-request_notification'
6007| || !empty($recipientContext['approve_url'])
6008| || !empty($recipientContext['reject_url']);
6009| if ($isUnifiedBpmRequestTemplate) {
6010| $values = $this->enrichRequestNotificationTemplateValues($values, $recipientContext);
6011| }
6012|
6013| // Try primary slug first; if nothing sent (missing DB template etc.), fall back to generic BPM template
6014| $slugsToTry = [$templateSlug];
6015| if ($templateSlug !== self::BPM_GENERIC_EMAIL_TEMPLATE_SLUG) {
6016| $slugsToTry[] = self::BPM_GENERIC_EMAIL_TEMPLATE_SLUG;
6017| }
6018|
6019| $slugUsed = $templateSlug;
6020| foreach ($slugsToTry as $trySlug) {
6021| $roundSent = 0;
6022| $roundErrors = [];
6023| foreach ($recipients as $recipientEmail) {
6024| try {
6025| error_log("[EMAIL DEBUG] Calling sendMessage to={$recipientEmail}, template={$trySlug}");
6026| $sent = $this->companySenderGenerator->sendMessage($company, $trySlug, $recipientEmail, $values);
6027| error_log('[EMAIL DEBUG] sendMessage returned: ' . var_export($sent, true));
6028|
6029| if ($sent > 0) {
6030| $roundSent++;
6031| error_log("[EMAIL DEBUG] ✅ EMAIL ENVIADO com sucesso para {$recipientEmail}");
6032| $this->log('info', '✅ EMAIL ENVIADO VIA AUTOMAÇÃO', [
6033| 'to' => $recipientEmail,
6034| 'recipient_type' => $recipient,
6035| 'template' => $trySlug,
6036| 'company' => $company->getName(),
6037| 'member_email' => $member->getUser()?->getEmail() ?? $member->getCompanyMember()?->getEmail(),
6038| ]);
6039| } else {
6040| error_log("[EMAIL DEBUG] ⚠️ sendMessage retornou 0 - email NÃO enviado para {$recipientEmail}");
6041| }
6042| } catch (\Exception $e) {
6043| error_log('[EMAIL DEBUG] ❌ EXCEÇÃO ao enviar email: ' . $e->getMessage());
6044| $roundErrors[] = [
6045| 'to' => $recipientEmail,
6046| 'error' => $e->getMessage(),
6047| ];
6048| $this->log('error', 'Erro ao enviar e-mail via CompanySenderGenerator', [
6049| 'to' => $recipientEmail,
6050| 'error' => $e->getMessage(),
6051| 'template' => $trySlug,
6052| ]);
6053| }
6054| }
6055| if ($roundSent > 0) {
6056| $sentCount = $roundSent;
6057| $slugUsed = $trySlug;
6058| $errors = $roundErrors;
6059| break;
6060| }
6061| $errors = array_merge($errors, $roundErrors);
6062| }
6063|
6064| // 💬 TAMBÉM ENVIAR NO CHAT para destinatários conhecidos.
6065| // Quando _resolved_recipient_type está setado, o destinatário já foi
6066| // resolvido externamente (executeNotify) — enviar chat apenas para $recipients
6067| // específicos para evitar multiplicação (N managers × N re-resolvidos).
6068| if ($originalRecipientType && $member) {
6069| $chatBody = $this->renderEmailTemplateBody($company, $slugUsed, $values);
6070| if ($isUnifiedBpmRequestTemplate) {
6071| $chatBody = $this->buildRequestNotificationChatBody($values, $config, $chatBody);
6072| }
6073|
6074| if (isset($config['_resolved_recipient_type'])) {
6075| $chatMessagesSent = $this->sendChatToSpecificEmails($recipients, $member, $subject, $chatBody, $config);
6076| } else {
6077| $chatMessagesSent = $this->sendChatForRecipientType($originalRecipientType, $member, $subject, $chatBody, $values, $config);
6078| }
6079| }
6080|
6081| return [
6082| 'sent' => $sentCount > 0,
6083| 'sent_count' => $sentCount,
6084| 'total_recipients' => count($recipients),
6085| 'to' => $recipients,
6086| 'template' => $slugUsed,
6087| 'via' => 'CompanySenderGenerator',
6088| 'errors' => $errors,
6089| 'chatMessagesSent' => count($chatMessagesSent),
6090| 'chatUserIds' => $chatMessagesSent
6091| ];
6092| }
6093| }
6094|
6095| $body = $this->replaceVariables($body, $member, $context);
6096| $subject = $this->replaceVariables($subject, $member, $context);
6097|
6098| if ($this->mailer) {
6099| foreach ($recipients as $recipientEmail) {
6100| try {
6101| $email = (new Email())
6102| ->from('noreply@metahuman.com')
6103| ->to($recipientEmail)
6104| ->subject($subject)
6105| ->html($body);
6106|
6107| $this->mailer->send($email);
6108| $sentCount++;
6109| } catch (\Exception $e) {
6110| $errors[] = [
6111| 'to' => $recipientEmail,
6112| 'error' => $e->getMessage()
6113| ];
6114| }
6115| }
6116|
6117| // 💬 TAMBÉM ENVIAR NO CHAT para destinatários conhecidos (usa o body já com variáveis substituídas)
6118| if ($originalRecipientType && $member) {
6119| $isUnifiedBpmRequestTemplate = ($templateSlug === 'bpm-request_notification')
6120| || !empty($config['approve_url'])
6121| || !empty($config['reject_url']);
6122| if ($isUnifiedBpmRequestTemplate) {
6123| $fallbackValues = $this->buildEmailTemplateValues($member, $recipientContext);
6124| $fallbackValues = $this->enrichRequestNotificationTemplateValues($fallbackValues, $recipientContext);
6125| $body = $this->buildRequestNotificationChatBody($fallbackValues, $config, $body);
6126| }
6127| if (isset($config['_resolved_recipient_type'])) {
6128| $chatMessagesSent = $this->sendChatToSpecificEmails($recipients, $member, $subject, $body, $config);
6129| } else {
6130| $chatMessagesSent = $this->sendChatForRecipientType($originalRecipientType, $member, $subject, $body, [], $config);
6131| }
6132| }
6133|
6134| return [
6135| 'sent' => $sentCount > 0,
6136| 'sent_count' => $sentCount,
6137| 'total_recipients' => count($recipients),
6138| 'to' => $recipients,
6139| 'subject' => $subject,
6140| 'errors' => $errors,
6141| 'chatMessagesSent' => count($chatMessagesSent),
6142| 'chatUserIds' => $chatMessagesSent
6143| ];
6144| }
6145|
6146| $this->log('info', 'Email seria enviado (mailer não configurado)', [
6147| 'to' => $recipients,
6148| 'subject' => $subject
6149| ]);
6150|
6151| return ['sent' => false, 'simulated' => true, 'to' => $recipients, 'subject' => $subject];
6152| }
6153|
6154| /**
6155| * Builds the values array for CompanySenderGenerator (Twig template variables).
6156| * Maps member/context to keys commonly used in EmailTemplate (companyName, nome, message, etc.).
6157| */
6158| private function buildEmailTemplateValues(?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
6159| {
6160| $values = [
Request #15
deepseek-v4-flash
P:77.05K C:503 CR:74.37K CW:0
4654ms
Reasoning
Wait. In executeSendEmail, when templateSlug is null and mailer configured, it sends `$body` via mailer and chat uses `$config`. But when `_resolved_recipient_type` set, chat goes through `sendChatToSpecificEmails`. `$config` there is the emailConfig which includes `system_sender`, and `sendChatToSpecificEmails` presumably calls sendChatNotification? Let's search sendChatToSpecificEmails definition and how config passed. But the key question: does sendChatToSpecificEmails forward system_sender to sendChatNotification? It's defined around 13775? Actually 13775 is the call inside sendChatForRecipientType. Let me search for function sendChatToSpecificEmails.
Wait actually in the CompanySenderGenerator path (used when templateSlug set), the chat goes via `sendChatToSpecificEmails($recipients, $member, $subject, $chatBody, $config)` where $config is the emailConfig passed into executeSendEmail, which includes system_sender. So likely fine.
But note: The handler executeNotify passes message_html non-empty → email template body set. But templateSlug is null. So in executeSendEmail: templateSlug null → skipAutoTemplate false and `$originalRecipientType` maybe 'company_member'? Wait emailConfig 'to' => user email; `$originalRecipientType` comes from config['recipient'] or config['to']?? In executeSendEmail, config has 'to' => user email (an email string), not the recipient type. Let me check how originalRecipientType resolved; maybe via `_resolved_recipient_type` key which is set in emailConfig to recipientType 'company_member'. So chat sends via sendChatToSpecificEmails.
OK so it likely works. system_sender reaches config.
Let me find sendChatToSpecificEmails quickly to confirm it forwards config to sendChatNotification or has its own assistant path. Search.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "private function sendChatToSpecificEmails"}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 1 13754| private function sendChatToSpecificEmails(
Request #16
deepseek-v4-flash
P:77.59K C:90 CR:77.44K CW:0
1822ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 13820, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 13754}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15468)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 13754-13820
13754| private function sendChatToSpecificEmails(
13755| array $emails,
13756| FlowInstanceMember $member,
13757| string $subject,
13758| string $body,
13759| array $config = []
13760| ): array {
13761| $chatUserIds = [];
13762| $userRepo = $this->entityManager->getRepository(User::class);
13763|
13764| $chatBody = strip_tags($body);
13765| $chatBody = html_entity_decode($chatBody, ENT_QUOTES | ENT_HTML5, 'UTF-8');
13766| if (empty($chatBody)) {
13767| $chatBody = 'Você tem uma nova notificação.';
13768| }
13769|
13770| foreach ($emails as $email) {
13771| $user = $userRepo->findOneBy(['email' => $email]);
13772| if (!$user) {
13773| continue;
13774| }
13775| $result = $this->sendChatNotification($user, $subject, $chatBody, $member, 'direct', $config);
13776| if ($result['sent'] ?? false) {
13777| $chatUserIds[] = $user->getId();
13778| }
13779| }
13780|
13781| return $chatUserIds;
13782| }
13783|
13784| private function sendChatForRecipientType(
13785| string $recipientType,
13786| FlowInstanceMember $member,
13787| string $subject,
13788| string $body,
13789| array $values = [],
13790| array $config = []
13791| ): array {
13792| $chatUserIds = [];
13793|
13794| try {
13795| // Resolver destinatários do tipo (passar config para ter acesso a role_id e company_member_id)
13796| $users = $this->resolveRecipients($recipientType, $member, $config);
13797|
13798| if (empty($users)) {
13799| $this->log('warning', 'Nenhum usuário encontrado para tipo de destinatário no chat', [
13800| 'recipientType' => $recipientType
13801| ]);
13802| return [];
13803| }
13804|
13805| // Montar corpo da mensagem para chat (remover HTML se necessário)
13806| $chatBody = $body;
13807|
13808| // Se o body está vazio mas há valores do template, tentar montar uma mensagem básica
13809| if (empty($chatBody) && !empty($values)) {
13810| $chatBody = "Você recebeu uma nova notificação sobre: " . ($values['stage_name'] ?? $values['product_name'] ?? 'Processo');
13811| }
13812|
13813| // Remover tags HTML para chat (simplificado)
13814| $chatBody = strip_tags($chatBody);
13815| $chatBody = html_entity_decode($chatBody, ENT_QUOTES | ENT_HTML5, 'UTF-8');
13816|
13817| // Substituir variáveis se necessário
13818| $chatBody = $this->replaceVariables($chatBody, $member, []);
13819| $subject = $this->replaceVariables($subject, $member, []);
13820|
Request #17
deepseek-v4-flash
P:78.54K C:3.52K CR:77.57K CW:0
29166ms
Reasoning
OK, system_sender is passed via $config down to sendChatNotification in both paths.
Now, this flow works. In the specific handler path, the message flows through executeNotify → in-app notification → executeSendEmail (because message_html non-empty). executeSendEmail then sends an email and chat. If no mailer is configured (local/dev), the flow will go to the fallback (mailer null) and no chat? At 6098: `if ($this->mailer)`, else logs "Email seria enviado" and returns sent=false. So chat only sent if mailer exists? In the mailer path with CompanySenderGenerator. Wait there are two branches: templateSlug+CompanySenderGenerator branch (5997-6093) and generic mailer branch (6095-6144). In the generic branch, chat is sent after email, if `$originalRecipientType && $member`. `$originalRecipientType`: derived from config. In emailConfig, 'to' is user email; originalRecipientType = config['to']?? Hmm; it may be null then no chat. Actually they set `_resolved_recipient_type` = 'company_member', but `$originalRecipientType` is separate. Let me check beginning of executeSendEmail to see originalRecipientType. Not vital.
Given time, focus on main flagged issues. Let's prioritize:
1. Event reuse/overwrite (findLatest picks latest by trabalhador and overwrites pending fields with blank payload). HIGH.
2. Overwriting pending event data with empty config on reruns (data loss). This overlaps with #1. I'll combine as one comment since the diff location: The event selection logic is at 14983-15008. I can write one comment targeting these lines describing both aspects: not tied to offboarding context + overwriting pending manual data.
3. Cross-company responsible not validated. MEDIUM.
4. Migration seeds all companies & activates product; down() deletes templates with cascade deleting flow_instances; leaves workflows orphan. MEDIUM (two comments perhaps, but focus on high-value ones: down cascade + orphan).
5. Multiple flush without transaction — event persisted before notification. MEDIUM/LOW.
6. intOrNull truncation on vrAlim/percAliment decimal columns. MEDIUM/LOW.
7. God object growth. Maybe skip given the service already huge and rules say "God object — maior peso... Sinalize isso antes de qualquer outro achado" — they want us to flag that the service is growing more. Since AutomationExecutionService is 15468 lines, this PR adds ~330 lines. The user-specific rules give priority 1 to god object / duplicated logic. We should flag that but not blocking with the precise format.
Wait, actually careful about false positives. Let me deeply verify issues.
### Verify #2 more concretely
Scenario: automation fires on_enter final stage. Creates event pendente with data from payload: config includes `motivoDesligamento` empty ('' from buildPayload default), `dataDesligamento` = dismissal date from offboarding. So payload fills `dtDeslig` but not `mtvDeslig`. The responsible then goes to the member's eSocial desligamento tab, edits the pending event filling `mtvDeslig` (motivo) etc., maybe via form save. That save is `saveEventS2299` which creates a NEW event? Actually the tab shows existing events and the ability to edit? Let me check: CompanyController 6373 handles event instance in a flowable variables listing? Hmm.
Let me check how the UI edits a pending event - is there an edit route that updates the same event id? Search for setStatus('pendente') and "update event S2299" or "editar". Search CompanyMemberController for s2299 editing.
Actually I already saw `saveEventS2299` always creates new event. So maybe the pending event review flow just opens a form and saves a new event each time (not edit). But then the automation "don't create duplicate pending event" logic: after transmit... Let's see handleEventAfterSave / how statuses change. The new S-2299 event pendente, when submitted, becomes status? Actually there may be a flow where pending means "rascunho". Hmm.
Given uncertainty about the manual editing flow, the safest concrete statement: if a pending event already exists (created by a prior run of this same automation for this offboarding, i.e., a re-entry to the stage or a retry), the second run overwrites with the automation's config-derived values. Since the payload may have been partially enriched by an edit to the event (if editing same event) OR simply when the user re-entered the stage after the responsible already adjusted some fields in the *same* event... If edits always create new events, then the pending event found would be the automation-created one, unchanged by manual edits; overwriting wouldn't lose manual data.
But there's a subtle scenario for loss: If automation runs, creates event pending with dtDeslig filled. The responsible edits... hmm.
Alternative concrete correctness bug (issue #1): Suppose a worker had a prior completed S-2299 event (transmitted with status != pendente, e.g., status 'enviado'/'processado'). Now the member is offboarded again (rehire + new termination). findLatest returns the old transmitted event → eventStatus 'existing_not_editable'. No new draft event created, only metadata. Return message says "já existe evento oficial não editável para este trabalhador" which is confusing/misleading and the responsible isn't alerted to create a new S-2299. This leads to missing eSocial obligation. Even for a first offboarding, if the automation is triggered twice, second run finds the event pendente (created first run) and updates it (idempotent update OK).
But wait — actually in the very common scenario: the worker gets offboarded (S-2299 created as draft → transmitted → status changes to something non-pendente). Then the same person later is hired again (readmissão) then offboarded again. Then latest event is non-pendente → automation skips, no new draft. That is plausible and real: people resign and later are rehired.
Now, another subtle thing: the automation never ties event to the specific offboarding, so if the automation runs and there is an existing *pending* S-2299 event that belongs to a previous, still-unfinished offboarding of the same worker (rare: two simultaneous offboarding flows?) could overwrite. Actually a worker shouldn't have two simultaneous active offboardings, but can be re-added to a new offboarding after being removed from previous pending one. Anyway.
I think the highest-value, well-supported comment: This new action locates the event only by trabalhador (worker), the same worker may have several desligamento events over time (readmissão). If the latest isn't pending, it doesn't create the draft for the current offboarding (no event created) — while still telling the responsible the "rascunho foi criado" in the notification? Actually notification message says "O rascunho do S-2299 de X foi criado a partir do offboarding." always — even when eventStatus = existing_not_editable or draft_only with missing data. That's also inaccurate but let's focus on main.
Wait: The in-app notification message is constant "O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding. Abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar os detalhes." In the `existing_not_editable` case there is no draft; and in draft_only missing-data case, only metadata with no event. This message is sent to the responsible regardless. Combined with the payload stored in metadata containing eventStatus, but the notification text claims draft was created. That's misleading but minor.
OK let me decide the comments (aim for precision over recall). Candidate list to finalize after more checks:
**Comment A (high)** — On reruns/overwrite, at lines 14983-15008 in AutomationExecutionService:
Two real defects: (1) findLatestEsocialS2299Event picks by worker only, ignoring company/offboarding context, so it can reuse the pending event from another process or treat a prior transmitted event of a readmission as "existing_not_editable" and never create the draft for the current offboarding; (2) when it updates an existing pending event, applyEsocialS2299Payload overwrites all fields with the automation config, wiping the values already filled/transmitted... Actually I'll present the event-not-linked-to-offboarding plus overwrite of pending as one comment.
Better to split into two precise comments:
- A1 (high): event lookup not tied to current offboarding/process, causing either reuse of pending draft from another context or missing draft after readmissão.
- A2 (high): re-running overwrites existing pending event with blank config (applyEsocialS2299Payload resets fields), losing manual data.
Actually A1 and A2 are both about the same block. But each line targeted is fine.
**Comment B (medium)**: no company check for configured responsible id (cross-tenant notification of termination data to someone outside company) in resolveEsocialS2299Responsible.
**Comment C (medium)**: multiple flush without transaction; if notify fails after persist, event/metadata already committed but automation reports failure → inconsistent retry semantics. Actually the more interesting angle: If an exception is thrown inside executeNotify AFTER flush of event (e.g., in sendChatNotification? which catches exceptions), event committed; retry of automation later (if implemented) would create/update duplicate. But there's idempotency logic for pending. Meh. The bigger inconsistency: They flush metadata with eventId null first, then second flush to set eventId. If between flush #1 and flush #2 an exception occurs, sourceMetadata eventId stays null but event exists. Rare. I'll flag medium about atomicity: build whole payload, single flush, and decide notification inside try. Actually might be considered over-flagging. Let me keep as medium, low confidence. Hmm, rules: precision over recall. This pattern of not using transactions might match codebase convention (many services persist then notify). Consider downgrading severity and keep? I might skip since executeNotify catches exceptions internally and rarely throws. But the persistence already happened BEFORE notification; a failure in notification wouldn't revert event creation — but that's arguably intended (draft created regardless; notification failure just reported). Actually they return notification result, success true. Even if notification fails (sent false), event still created — that is fine because the automation created the draft and metadata stored review URL; the responsible can still find it. So atomicity of "notification" vs "event" isn't needed. The second flush is a redundant pattern but not a bug per se. I'll drop C, or fold into maintainability of double flush? Skip.
**Comment D (medium)**: vrAlim/percAliment conversion intOrNull truncates decimals while columns are decimal(10,2) — real precision loss. But note entity setters typed ?int. Hmm. It's a real mismatch; when the event is eventually sent to eSocial, vrAlim (R$) must preserve cents. Yet if the entity stores int, existing system already stores int? Wait saveEventS2299 passes raw strings, and the setter typed ?int coerces numeric strings to int as well (losing decimals). So the existing system may already lose decimals... Since the whole codebase appears to treat vrAlim as int, but DB column decimal(10,2) allows cents. Hmm. Actually there may be a subtle bug in the DB schema creation; the entity metadata uses decimal(10,2), so DB column is decimal. Doctrine returns string for decimals; getters typed ?int would fail reading (TypeError) under strict... without strict_types, returning "1234.56" from getVrAlim typed int → TypeError. Existing code presumably works (tests pass) because these fields remain null usually.
I'll flag D as medium/low but careful: since entity declares int setter types, we can't simply convert to decimal without adjusting entity. The actual issue: passing "30.5" config would silently drop decimal. Suggest clarifying with domain owner. Low-medium confidence; maybe medium severity is fine given financial data.
**Comment E (medium)**: migration seeds all companies indiscriminately + no company/tenant filter, and activates product. Precedent migrations do seed all companies too (Version20260519173602 selects all companies but only where workflow exists; the new migration creates workflows if missing — for companies without offboarding!). It iterates ALL companies creating a workflow 'Fluxos de Saída', template, etc. That could add rows to every company even inactive. Precedent: 20260518151423 perhaps targeted companies with journey product plans. Let me verify quickly whether other migrations iterate all companies and create templates per company. Version20260519173602: iterates all companies but skips those without workflow 'fluxo-com-o-cliente'. The new migration creates workflow if not exists, so it seeds to every tenant regardless of usage — heavier. But is that harmful? It creates template rows per company. For a SaaS with many companies (thousands), the migration would run many writes. But migrations in this codebase seem to do that already (journey seeds). We need to confirm the doc; also all seeds appear to have been accepted before. Might be considered acceptable pattern in this codebase. Given precision-over-recall, I could downgrade to an "Atenção/Leve" or skip. But the migration also sets `products.active=1` for offboarding product — enabling a product for all companies. Actually the product row is global (products table is global? slug unique), active=1 affects all. The workflow/template per company is per tenant.
Also: When ensureTemplate finds an existing template but stages already exist (from earlier run) ensureStage matches by name; ensureAutomation matches by name+trigger+action; if user customized and renamed automation names, new ones might be added again, duplicating. Not major.
**Comment F (medium/high)**: down() deletes templates; flow_instances FK is ON DELETE CASCADE → a rollback of this migration deletes flow instances (business processes) created from the template. Additionally down leaves the created workflows/workflow_products orphaned (not removed) and product stays active=1. Recommend: down only deactivate/mark non-seed or document irreversible. This is a concrete data loss in rollback scenario. Precedent migrations also delete templates, but those templates likely not intended to spawn instances before rollback. Here the whole point is that instances will be created from this template in production quickly; if a rollback is needed later, data loss. Medium.
Now also the **god object / duplicated logic**: rules (priority 1 for services) - "Sinalize isso antes de qualquer outro achado". So I should add a comment (maintainability) that this adds ~330 lines to already 15k-line god object, suggesting extraction. But given it is already the established pattern for automations (execute* methods all live here), maybe a low comment.
Wait, the user-specific service rules say priority #1 is god object/duplicated logic with the greatest weight, "Sinalize isso antes de qualquer outro achado." So I should include it as a comment, but not necessarily blocking. But comments in the review should be placed at the code added lines.
Let me also check the twig fix for correctness more thoroughly: In motivo_desligamento.html.twig, prevEvts from where? Let me read template top to understand structure and whether there are other places referencing prevEvts.desligamento that may have similar problem, and confirm the change matches surrounding usage (e.g., later they use prevEvts.termino.dtDeslig). Read file.
Vou ler o template do guia de desligamento para conferir o contexto da correção e se há outros pontos com o mesmo problema.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 140, "file_path": "templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig", "start_line": 1}
Result
File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig (Total lines: 124)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-124
1|<section id="termino-motivo-desligamento" class="dynamic-termino-section" style="display: none;">
2| <form>
3| <h5>Motivo do Desligamento</h5>
4| <p class="card-description">
5| Informe os dados relacionados ao motivo do desligamento ou término do trabalhador.
6| </p>
7| <div class="row">
8| <!-- Motivo do Desligamento -->
9|<div class="col-md-6 mb-3">
10| <label for="termino-motivoDesligamento">Motivo do Desligamento <span class="text-danger">*</span></label>
11| <select class="form-control" id="termino-motivoDesligamento" name="termino-motivoDesligamento" required>
12| <option value="" selected disabled>Selecione um motivo</option>
13| <option value="01"
14| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '01' %}
15| selected
16| {% endif %}>
17| 01 - Exoneração do diretor não empregado sem justa causa
18| </option>
19| <option value="02"
20| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '02' %}
21| selected
22| {% endif %}>
23| 02 - Término de mandato do diretor não empregado não reconduzido
24| </option>
25| <option value="03"
26| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '03' %}
27| selected
28| {% endif %}>
29| 03 - Exoneração a pedido de diretor não empregado
30| </option>
31| <option value="04"
32| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '04' %}
33| selected
34| {% endif %}>
35| 04 - Exoneração do diretor não empregado por culpa recíproca ou força maior
36| </option>
37| <option value="05"
38| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '05' %}
39| selected
40| {% endif %}>
41| 05 - Morte do diretor não empregado
42| </option>
43| <option value="06"
44| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '06' %}
45| selected
46| {% endif %}>
47| 06 - Exoneração por falência ou encerramento
48| </option>
49| <option value="07"
50| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '07' %}
51| selected
52| {% endif %}>
53| 07 - Mudança de CPF
54| </option>
55| <option value="99"
56| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '99' %}
57| selected
58| {% endif %}>
59| 99 - Outros
60| </option>
61| </select>
62| <small class="form-text text-muted">
63| Selecione o código conforme a Tabela 19 do eSocial.
64| </small>
65|</div>
66|
67|
68|
69|
70|
71| <!-- Data do Término -->
72| <div class="col-md-6 mb-3">
73| <label for="termino-dataTermino">Data do Término <span class="text-danger">*</span></label>
74| <input
75| type="date"
76| id="termino-dataTermino"
77| name="termino-dataTermino"
78| class="form-control"
79| required
80| placeholder="Selecione a data do término"
81| value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.dtTerm %}{{ prevEvts.termino.dtTerm|date('Y-m-d') }}{% endif %}">
82| <small class="form-text text-muted">
83| Último dia trabalhado. Deve ser igual ou anterior à data atual + 10 dias.
84| </small>
85| </div>
86|
87|
88|
89| <!-- Número Processo Trabalhista -->
90| <div class="col-md-6 mb-3">
91| <label for="termino-numeroProcesso">Número Processo Trabalhista</label>
92| <input
93| type="text"
94| id="termino-numeroProcesso"
95| name="termino-numeroProcesso"
96| class="form-control"
97| maxlength="20"
98| placeholder="Informe o número do processo trabalhista"
99| value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab %}{{ prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab }}{% endif %}">
100| <small class="form-text text-muted">
101| Número que identifica o processo trabalhista (opcional).
102| </small>
103| </div>
104|</div>
105|
106| <div id="buttons-container" class="mt-4"></div>
107| </form>
108|</section>
109|
110|<script>
111| document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", () => {
112| const dateField = document.getElementById("termino-dataTermino");
113|
114| if (dateField) {
115| const today = new Date();
116| const maxDate = new Date(today);
117| maxDate.setDate(today.getDate() + 10);
118|
119| const formattedMaxDate = maxDate.toISOString().split("T")[0]; // Formata para AAAA-MM-DD
120| dateField.setAttribute("max", formattedMaxDate); // Define o atributo max dinamicamente
121| }
122| });
123|</script>
124|
Request #18
deepseek-v4-flash
P:83.6K C:6.19K CR:82.05K CW:0
49871ms
Reasoning
The template fix is consistent with the rest: all other references use `prevEvts.termino`; before the change line 99 was `prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` — mixing keys, so it likely never displayed when `prevEvts.desligamento` was null/unset; but wait: the change is: previously the condition `prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` would raise an error if `prevEvts.desligamento` truthy but `prevEvts.termino` missing? Actually if prevEvts.termino is not set and prevEvts.desligamento is set (both presumably keys), then `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` in Twig when prevEvts.termino is null: attribute access on null returns null → condition false. If prevEvts is itself null (no event at all): `prevEvts.desligamento` on null → null, short-circuit false. So the old code was probably safe at runtime but wrong semantically (checked desligamento instead of termino). Fix is correct. The `value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab %}...{% endif %}"`—no `else` needed since empty value is fine. Good, no comment needed; it's a legitimate fix.
But if `prevEvts.termino` doesn't exist at all in the array (e.g., prevEvts only has s2299?), Twig `prevEvts.termino` when key missing returns null unless the data is an array where undefined index yields null (Twig returns null for missing map key). Fine.
Now templates list_automations and flow_detail just add label mapping. Fine.
Now check the automation YAML format: siblings under `movement` don't define allowed/blocked triggers except a few examples. New entry adds `allowed_triggers` and `blocked_triggers` and `blocked_trigger_message`. Let's verify that other entries in the YAML that restrict triggers use the same keys, to keep consistent spelling. In the file there are entries with `allowed_triggers`/`blocked_triggers`/`blocked_trigger_message` at line 217-220 (delay_offboarding_visibility). So format consistent.
One nuance: `allowed_triggers: ["employee_enters_stage"]` plus blocked list including `days_in_stage` etc. This is a subset of allowed; if trigger names mismatch (e.g., "on_enter" vs "employee_enters_stage"), the mapping might make the action unusable. Need to compare to the trigger names used elsewhere in this file: The visible entries use "employee_enters_stage"? We see in list around line 217-220: `allowed_triggers: - "employee_enters_stage"` and blocked includes `offboarding_completed`, etc. So consistent within the file. And migration's seeded trigger types are `on_enter`; the UI maps them. OK.
Also `config_preset: to: flow_responsible` used elsewhere. Good.
Now let me verify what happened in the earlier changed region at line 7039/7044 (adding system_sender to emailConfig) is harmless.
One subtle behavioral regression check: Before the PR, `$isPayrollSystemSender` only when sourceType payroll; now `$isSystemSender` also true if config system_sender. But what about other flows that call sendChatNotification with config containing key 'system_sender' accidentally? Only newly added config. Fine.
Now consider `executeNotify` merging context: For our handler they pass `'member_id' => (string) $companyMember->getId()` in context, plus config includes 'to' => company_member... but `resolveRecipients('company_member', $member, $recipientContext)` — recipientContext includes config (company_member_id => responsible id). So the in-app notification is created for the responsible's user. Good.
But the in-app notification's title/message = same text to responsible. Message claims "Abra o chat com a Adriana" — the notification center's button URL is /chat?adriana=1 (set in executeNotify line 7012). This matches "botão ver detalhes direciona para chat com Adriana". Good.
Now evaluate the biggest concern (event lookup by worker) with the actual entity cardinality. In the eSocial UI (the guide / member_guides_esocial_termino), prevEvts.termino shows previous term event; UI probably shows existing S-2299? The repository `getFlowableDataForTemplate` returns data for a given event ID. So multiple events can exist. Also readmission flows create new S-2200 and new S-2299 at term; so multiple S-2299 per trabalhador are plausible. Since the code only looks at the latest event by id DESC, and treats non-pendente as "existing_not_editable" without creating a new draft, a second offboarding of the same worker (after readmissão) would never create an S-2299 draft. This is a concrete gap relative to the feature's goal (draft for current offboarding).
Let me confirm statuses used. Search for statuses on S-2299 events, like 'transmitido', 'enviado', 'processado', 'pendente', in EsocialEvents base or CompanyController. Search setStatus for S2299.
Given enough evidence, craft comment A1 with moderate-high severity. A2 also in same place — but the risk of overwriting pending with blank config. Let me combine both in a single comment describing selection/overwrite flaw? The rules: comment must be concise; one comment per issue better. I'll do two comments:
1. On `findLatestEsocialS2299Event` call region (line 14983-15003): event selection not tied to offboarding/company and skips when latest is not pendente — reuse of another context or absence of draft on readmissão; suggest filtering pending events by company and creating new event for a different term date.
2. On `applyEsocialS2299Payload` invocation for an existing pending event (line 15005-15008): overwrite resets fields to config/default empty values each run. Suggest merging only non-empty fields or only when creating.
Wait — there's overlap: #2 overwriting *existing pending event* also includes the case where the pending event belongs to this same offboarding (first run created it) and then a re-run overwrites with the same data — harmless. The harmful case: a pending event from another context (previous pending offboarding of same worker) gets overwritten; that's covered in comment 1. And second: overwriting resets manual edits if the UI edits the same pending event (unknown). Maybe only keep comment 1 plus mention that for a pending event found, reapplying the automation's (possibly empty) config overwrites any value already filled (e.g., by the responsible's review) since there's no merge. I'll fold into one comment focused on the block.
Actually wait — do users edit an existing pending event? The eSocial draft events: When user fills the termination form, does it create new event each save or update pending event? The controller `saveEventS2299` always creates a new event. But note the guides are for TSV (S-2399)? motivo_desligamento.html.twig uses `termino-*` and `mtvDesligTsv`, and prevEvts.termino - S-2399 TSV (termino sem vínculo). Hmm interesting: This template is for "termino" (TSV). While the automation creates S-2299 draft. But the member's tab esocialTab=desligamento displays S-2299 forms? Not the same template? The template path is member_guides_esocial_termino. There might be separate s2299 form elsewhere. Actually the linked company member manage tab 'desligamento' probably hosts S-2299 form. Let's not go down this hole.
The fact that there is no update-edit of pending event found doesn't kill comment 2 but reduces confidence. Given "favor precision over recall", I'll keep comment 2 but severity medium with explicit scenario of re-entry/retry overwriting fields that the responsible had filled if the draft is edited in place (or resetting values that came from previous runs/config changes). Hmm.
Actually there's a much clearer data-integrity issue with rerun: if the same event (pending) is later transmitted (status becomes non-pendente) and then the automation runs again after offboarding changes... no—it would go to existing_not_editable. Fine.
Alternative concrete problem: idempotence claim "não deve duplicar evento pendente já existente para o mesmo contexto". The current code avoids duplication only by treating ANY latest non-pendente as the same context and refusing to create; and treats any latest pendente as the same context and updates it. Without context filtering, a worker leaving the company for the second time (or a pending draft created manually by HR in UI) is never given a fresh draft; or its existing draft is silently overwritten with data from the current offboarding. Both are data/correctness issues.
OK final comment set:
1. HIGH — event lookup not tied to offboarding context → wrong reuse or no draft on rehire. Also mention metadata-only & misleading notification. Lines: 14983-15008 (target 14983 existing code snippet). Existing code lines in diff: The block lines 14983-15008 in the new file. For the comment, existing_code must match a snippet of newly added code lines. The code_comment tool matches consecutive added lines in the diff. Since entire method is added, any lines there are added. I'll pick a snippet like:
```
$latestEvent = $this->findLatestEsocialS2299Event($esocialTrabalhador);
if ($latestEvent instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $latestEvent->getStatus() !== 'pendente') {
```
2. HIGH/MEDIUM — overwrite pending event with blank config (data loss). Snippet:
```
if ($eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable') {
$event->setDadosRemuneracao($remuneracao);
$this->applyEsocialS2299Payload($event, $payload);
$this->entityManager->persist($event);
}
```
Content: on a new run (member re-enters the stage/retry), an existing pending event is overwritten by applyEsocialS2299Payload whose payload mostly empty (config default blank in the seeded template) → any previously filled data (mtvDeslig etc.) is reset to null. Merge-only-empty-fields or compare before writing.
3. MEDIUM — cross-company responsible id no validation. Snippet `$responsible = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find((int) $configuredId);` or better at function. Also should validate company member matches flow company. Snippet lines 15089-15094.
Actually let's double check: also company member from offboarding (employee) may not belong to flow company? offboardingMember->getCompanyMember() — belongs to the offboarding company, and flow instance company presumably same. Fine.
4. MEDIUM — multiple flush / no transaction + notify after persist could leave orphan. Actually maybe skip; but let me instead consider adding the "intOrNull truncation" finding because it's very concrete given the DB decimal columns. Let's confirm the two columns: percAliment decimal(10,2); vrAlim decimal(10,2); setter types int. The repository saveEventS2299 passes raw (strings) so Doctrine converts to decimal preserving two places. New code `intOrNull` truncates: if user config `vrAlim: "1500.50"`, event gets 1500 (int) stored into decimal column = 1500.00, losing 0.50. Given columns decimal scale 2, the code that transmits to eSocial may expect cents. Real risk when config includes such values. Since default template has blank, only when automation customized. Severity medium. Also `pensAlim` as int is correct? pensAlim is `indPensAlim` type (1 = sim) maybe should be 1/0? Wait eSocial S-2299 pensAlim? Actually in S-2299 layout: `pensAlim` (indicativo de pensão alimentícia: S/N). But in this entity, pensAlim integer. It's whatever; don't get deep.
Let me confirm how values flow to XML generator to assert monetary impact. Search usage of vrAlim in XML/template building (S-2299 XML writer maybe uses event fields). But given entity column decimal(10,2) is enough. I'll report with medium severity and ask to preserve decimals via float/string conversion or entity fix.
Actually maybe combine D with comment 2? No, separate.
5. MEDIUM — migration down() cascade data loss (flow_instances ON DELETE CASCADE) + orphaned workflows. Provide snippet `DELETE FROM flow_templates WHERE id = :templateId`.
6. LOW/MEDIUM — migration seeds all companies even those without offboarding product active & sets product active globally; but precedent exists. Maybe comment on the specific aspect: it *creates* workflow 'Fluxos de Saída' for every company even those without offboarding/esocial. Given docs claim migration for production all tenants; might be intended. Precedent migration Version20260519173602 created templates only where workflow already existed. And Version20260518151423 seeded journeys per company with product plan filter? Let me check 20260518151423 more to see company filtering. Actually earlier we saw it created flow_templates per company probably for journey plans. It did select all companies? Let me check quickly lines 600-660.
Given the trade-off, I might downgrade this to a low/attention comment (não-bloqueante) but still valuable: confirm with product team all tenants should receive an active template + workflow even if product is off. Also its isTransactional false and massive per-company writes in production could lock. But the codebase migrations commonly do this.
Let me check 20260518151423 up() company iteration to see if it filters.
Actually, given limited budget, I'll keep migration concerns: (a) down() data loss/orphans (medium), and (b) seeding without filtering by company esocial/offboarding (low). Actually (b) might be redundant if the product explicitly wants all tenants. Since the migration description says "por empresa", all companies. I'll include (b) as low, framed as question.
Also potential bug in migration: `ensureStage` matches existing stage by (flow_template_id, product_id, product_slot_index IS NULL, LOWER(name)); but in `ensureAutomation` uses name+trigger+action type to skip. If a previous run was interrupted mid-way after creating stages but before automations, re-run adds missing automations. Good idempotency. Fine.
One more possible real bug: In up(), `ensureOffboardingStages` runs on every company every time the migration runs? No, migrations run once. But if an operator re-runs migration (some do `migrate --down` then `up` or re-run with `--replay`?), ensure methods are idempotent enough. However if the user had already customized the template stages (renamed, deleted automations, changed order), a re-run of up() (e.g., on a fresh environment or after partial failure) will re-add deleted automations/stages to the customized template because it matches existing template by seed_migration key and then ensureStages re-adds any stage missing by the fixed name. Not a big deal; typically up() runs once.
Also ensureWorkflow returns existing workflow by slug; but when there's an existing default workflow 'fluxo-de-saida' per company with different name/description, it returns it. Fine.
Bug candidate in migration: In `down()`, `DELETE FROM flow_stages` may fail if flow_stages referenced by flow_instance_member current_stage? FK? Probably flow instances reference stages via flow_instance_stages? Not needed.
Let me confirm `products` global activation isn't a multi-tenant issue. `ensureProduct` looks up products by slug without company filter; but products table maybe global catalog. It updates active=1 - but this affects every tenant because product row is shared. Setting global product active isn't tenant-scoped anyway. Hmm. That means "active=1" is just ensuring the catalog item is active; not per company. OK.
Now consider whether event created but `dadosRemuneracao` needed; when there's no remuneracao data they only metadata. Then responsible must fill data; fine.
Another nuance: when `$esocialTrabalhador` exists but `remuneracao` missing, missing[] = 'esocial_remuneration_data'. But later notification message claims draft created. Minor.
OK also double-check the second concern about `$member->getSourceMetadata()`: metadata['esocialS2299Draft'] set then flush; second flush for eventId. `$event?->getId()` after persist before flush is null (Doctrine doesn't assign id until flush). Actually they flush at 15033 *after* persist. At that point event id assigned. Then they re-read metadata and update eventId and flush again. Wait first flush already includes event persist; so event->getId() after the first flush returns the id. So why the second flush? Because metadata array is captured at 15019 BEFORE first flush? Actually $metadata['esocialS2299Draft'] uses `'eventId' => $event?->getId()` at 15024 BEFORE flush (persist only at 15008, no flush yet). Then member->setSourceMetadata(metadata) and flush() at 15031-15033: flush inserts event AND persists member metadata with eventId null. Then at 15035 they update metadata eventId and flush again. OK that explains double flush. Not a bug per se, but if exception occurs between the two flushes... unlikely. And eventId null stored transiently—flushed twice in same request, second update wins. So no real problem unless crash. Skip C.
But wait: if exception occurs after first flush but before second, catch returns success=false while event was persisted. Event exists with status pending, metadata has eventId null. Subsequent run would find pending event and update it, and set eventId. Recoverable. So skip.
Actually wait, there's subtlety: after `$this->entityManager->flush()` at 15033, if `executeNotify` throws an exception (say DB error creating chat), the whole `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` catch catches Throwable and returns success false; but the event and metadata are already committed. This means the automation runner might retry the action and run applyEsocialS2299Payload again — no duplication due to pending reuse, but still consistent. So skip.
Now the god object comment: it's priority #1 per user rules. I'll add a maintainability comment (medium, non-blocking) suggesting extraction.
Let me now craft the final comment list. Also need to target each reviewed file with its own pass. Files:
- config/automations/offboarding.yaml: ok, no issues (format consistent; triggers consistent).
- Migration file: comments on down() data loss/orphans (medium) and possibly seeds-all-companies (low).
- AutomationExecutionService: comments (1,2,3, decimal truncation, god object).
- Twig templates: fix ok; list label additions fine.
Number of comments: aim for focused set. Let me settle severity:
- C1 (event lookup not tied to current offboarding): high.
- C2 (overwrite pending event with config/blank on re-run): high? But given uncertainty of same-event editing, medium-high. Actually there's a well-defined scenario: A re-run *when latest is pending from a previous offboarding of same worker that never got transmitted* — automation will overwrite. Overwriting belongs to another offboarding context is issue C1. Re-running in *same* offboarding overwrites same data (no loss). Manual-edit scenario unknown. So C2's data loss scenario requires that pending event holds different/richer data than automation config, which happens when pending was created by something else (previous automation with a config, manual creation, or HR editing). If manual edits create new events each time rather than editing, then there wouldn't be a pending event with manual data other than automation-created... unless HR filled the form creating new event while an older pending event existed. Actually if the automation created event #1 pending, then HR opens form & saves → creates event #2 pending (via saveEventS2299). Then automation re-run finds latest = #2 (pending) and overwrites #2 with blank config, clobbering HR's manual data. That is plausible! Because saveEventS2299 creates a new event each time rather than updating the draft. So yes, re-running automation overwrites the HR-filled newest pending event. But would automation rerun after HR saved? Trigger is on stage enter; it fires once when member enters stage. HR filling form happens after. No re-run typically. Could the automation be triggered again by user manually running it from UI? Possibly (there may be a "run now" button). Not certain.
I'll set C2 medium with clear scenario.
Wait — actually maybe there's a more direct bug in C2 scenario even on the FIRST run: if a *manual pending draft already existed before the member reached final stage* (HR pre-created a S-2299 draft via member page), then automation's first run finds that pending event and overwrites it with automation payload (blank fields), erasing the manual data. That's a plain, likely scenario! Because the flow is "create a draft automatically when the member enters final stage", but if the responsible already created a draft (perhaps the offboarding form allowed), it will clobber. Also if another automation created pending. I think the scenario is concrete enough. C2 = medium/high. I'll use high for C1 and medium for C2? Let's use high for both? Overwrite of pending manual data = data loss — high is justified. But there's some uncertainty about how much manual edits happen on the same event. I'll use medium to be safe for C2 and high for C1.
Actually C1 severity: if the latest event is a transmitted one from an earlier termination (readmissão), automation never creates new draft — an entire missing eSocial obligation for a real rehire scenario, silent (only metadata). That's a functional bug. high.
C3 responsible cross-company: medium. But is it plausible that config contains responsible_id? In the seeded template, config is only to/_default_automation_id. There's no UI for `responsible_id` fields in has_config false. Only when templates copied/merged or flow config tampered. However, the YAML config_preset includes `to: flow_responsible`, and if someone creates a custom automation with config fields (not through this preset, but via the config form that maybe isn't exposed), values could come from other automation fields like company_member_id? Actually the config comes from automation 'actions' array stored in DB; the flow editor may let set arbitrary config keys (like template, to). It's a soft risk. Medium is OK, given the data (termination info, internal URL) could be sent to someone in another company if a config ID were misused. I'll keep medium but concise.
C4 decimal truncation: medium. Wait, but since the setters are typed int, values would be stored as int anyway; also columns decimal allow cents. Actually, if a user config sets vrAlim to 0.50 → intOrNull returns null? No: is_numeric("0.50") true → (int) "0.50" = 0 → event vrAlim 0 instead of 0.50. And '0.5' returns 0. That's a data integrity issue (silent change). If the intent is int R$ only, decimals impossible anyway, but DB scale 2 suggests intended cents. I'll mention to confirm expected unit (reais inteiros vs centavos). If they want reais with cents, use float/string. Keep medium.
Hmm, but there's risk I'm misreading. What if `vrAlim` in eSocial schema is integer (value in reais without cents)? eSocial S-2299: vrAlim is a numeric field 13,2 (value of alimony). percAliment is numeric 5,2 (percent). eSocial layout typically uses 2 decimal places. So decimal truncation is wrong. Keep medium.
C5 migration down() cascade deletion & orphans: medium.
C6 migration seeds all companies indiscriminately: low — mention only if product intent unclear.
C7 god-object growth: medium/low maintainability. The user rules put it as top priority for services, so include it. But since comments should focus on defects, I'd phrase as maintainability: "Este service já tem ~15.5k linhas; a PR adiciona ~330 linhas de regra eSocial (payload, conversão, notificação) dentro dele. Recomendo extrair para serviço dedicado antes de seguir crescendo." Snippet: the method signature line.
Also the C2 content mentions "applyEsocialS2299Payload" and the payload values from buildEsocialS2299DraftPayload default to '' for fields the automation can't know. That resets all of them to null on update. Good.
Now let me quickly verify that before persisting an *updated* pending event, there is nothing that merges only if fields empty — confirmed; apply always sets.
Let's also double check `EsocialDadosTrabalhador` is unique per company member and whether S-2299 events are per company. EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento->setCompany($company) exists? Base class EsocialEvents has company? In saveEventS2299 they set company. So event tied to company. The automation sets company when creating. But in the *update pending* branch, they don't verify event->company == flow company. If latest event belongs to a different company (worker changed company? company member is per company so trabalhador belongs to company). esocialTrabalhador found by companyMember => tied to this company. Its events all belong to this company (same trabalhador). So not cross-company. Fine.
Readmission scenario: a company member can be rehired; esocialTrabalhador persists with the same companyMember; the transmitted S-2299 from first term remains as the latest event. Automation on second term fails to create a new draft. Wait is companyMember id the same on rehire? The CompanyMembers row remains; yes typically same person same row. So C1 stands.
Now confirm the actual return "eventId => null" and message on `existing_not_editable`: The return message differentiates. The notification message to the user doesn't. ok.
Now also confirm a possible real bug in the metadata 'payload' storage: They store full payload including '_offboarding' referencing OffboardingMember etc. This is stored as JSON in DB sourceMetadata (column type json). Contains no sensitive? Includes responsibleName, reason. It's audit. Fine.
Let me quickly check the routes: buildEsocialS2299ReviewUrl uses router->generate('my_company_member_manage',...). Is that route name valid and does it accept query esocialTab? If the route doesn't exist, an exception would occur when router not null. Since the service depends on RouterInterface injectable; if null fallback path '/my-company/member/..'. Fine.
Let me check the route my_company_member_manage exists.
Vou confirmar se a rota usada para o link de revisão existe e ver o padrão de seeds de templates em migration anterior quanto a filtro por empresa.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/"], "search_text": "my_company_member_manage"}
Result
File: src/Controller/CompanyController.php
Match lines: 5
2855| * Ficha do colaborador V2 (design Figma). Rota: my_company_member_manage_v2.
2961| return $this->redirectToRoute('my_company_member_manage_v2', ['member' => $member]);
3014| return $this->redirectToRoute('my_company_member_manage_v2', ['member' => $member]);
3018| return $this->redirectToRoute('my_company_member_manage_v2', ['member' => $member]);
3060| return $this->redirectToRoute('my_company_member_manage_v2', ['member' => $member]);
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystemRiskIntelligenceController.php
Match lines: 10
2708| 'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
3081| 'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
3429| 'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
3837| 'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
4318| 'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
4856| 'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
5410| 'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
5835| 'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
5978| 'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
6591| 'url' => $memberId ? $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => (int) $memberId]) : null,
File: src/Controller/Finance/PayrollFinanceController.php
Match lines: 1
3591| $actionUrl = $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage', $params) . '#dados_colaborador';
File: src/Controller/MetaHuman/ProfessionalDecisionSheetController.php
Match lines: 1
57| 'classicProfileUrl' => $this->generateUrl('my_company_member_manage_v2', ['member' => $member]),
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 660, "file_path": "migrations/Version20260518151423.php", "start_line": 600}
Result
File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php (Total lines: 1558)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 600-660
600|
601| foreach ($companyIds as $companyId) {
602| $companyId = (int) $companyId;
603| $workflowId = (int) ($this->connection->fetchOne(
604| 'SELECT id FROM workflows WHERE company_id = :c AND slug = :s LIMIT 1',
605| ['c' => $companyId, 's' => 'jornada-metahuman']
606| ) ?: 0);
607|
608| if (!$workflowId) {
609| continue;
610| }
611|
612| foreach ($this->getJourneyDefinitions() as $def) {
613| $journeyCode = (string) $def['code'];
614|
615| $exists = $this->connection->fetchOne(
616| 'SELECT id FROM flow_templates
617| WHERE workflow_id = :w
618| AND JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, \'$.seed_migration\')) = :seed
619| AND JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, \'$.journey_code\')) = :code
620| LIMIT 1',
621| ['w' => $workflowId, 'seed' => self::JOURNEY_SEED_KEY, 'code' => $journeyCode]
622| );
623| if ($exists) {
624| continue;
625| }
626|
627| $cycles = max(1, (int) $def['ciclos']);
628| $phaseDays = array_fill(0, $cycles, 30);
629| $startDate = (string) $def['start_date'];
630| $phaseAdvanceOnDates = $this->computeAdvanceOnDates($startDate, $phaseDays);
631| $phaseStartDates = $this->computeStartDates($startDate, $phaseAdvanceOnDates);
632| $desc = sprintf('[%s] %s Público-alvo: %s', $journeyCode, $def['essencia'], $def['publico']);
633|
634| $this->connection->executeStatement(
635| 'INSERT INTO flow_templates (workflow_id, company_id, name, description, is_active, settings, template_category, created_at, updated_at)
636| VALUES (:w, :c, :name, :desc, 1, :settings, :cat, NOW(), NOW())',
637| [
638| 'w' => $workflowId,
639| 'c' => $companyId,
640| 'name' => (string) $def['name'],
641| 'desc' => $desc,
642| 'cat' => 'metahuman_journey_cycle',
643| 'settings' => json_encode([
644| 'seed_migration' => self::JOURNEY_SEED_KEY,
645| 'journey_code' => $journeyCode,
646| 'cycle_phases' => $cycles,
647| 'phase_days' => $phaseDays,
648| 'cycle_type' => 'metahuman_journey',
649| 'cycle_timing_mode' => 'fixed_calendar',
650| 'cycle_anchor_date' => $startDate,
651| 'phase_andamento_start_dates' => $phaseStartDates,
652| 'phase_andamento_advance_on_dates' => $phaseAdvanceOnDates,
653| 'orchestrator_defaults_applied' => true,
654| 'metahuman_journey_management' => $this->buildDefaultManagementConfig(),
655| ], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
656| ]
657| );
658| $templateId = (int) $this->connection->lastInsertId();
659|
660| // Link all workflow products.
Request #19
deepseek-v4-flash
P:91.41K C:712 CR:89.73K CW:0
6538ms
Reasoning
Precedent seeds also skip companies without the workflow (they don't create workflows). The new migration creates the workflow if it doesn't exist for all companies (companies may not have an offboarding product). However, many companies may already have 'fluxo-de-saida' workflow. For companies without offboarding product at all (fresh tenants), the migration creates the workflow + template + product active. This could be intended as a "default available to all". Given uncertainty, keep low. Actually the description of migration explicitly says "por empresa" and the doc probably says all companies. It also ensures product active=1 which is global. I'll include as low severity informational.
Now the route my_company_member_manage exists (used elsewhere). And the fix template line is fine.
Let me also double-check the `system_sender` change: Any regressions for existing payroll messages? `$isSystemSender = system_sender flag OR payroll source`. Behavior preserved for payroll flows; other flows without flag behave as before (direct or shared channel logic). The only change is they pass `'system_sender' => $config['system_sender'] ?? null` to emailConfig and that config goes into `$recipientContext`? Actually emailConfig is passed to executeSendEmail as config. In executeSendEmail, chat may also be sent through `sendChatToSpecificEmails($recipients, ...)` for resolved recipients, passing config containing system_sender. Good.
Wait, potential regression: in executeNotify, config array for notify with `system_sender => true` will also propagate into `$recipientContext` merged at 6979 (recipientContext = array_merge($context, $config, ...)) including system_sender → resolveRecipients uses recipientContext? Only some recipient resolvers read config keys like company_member_id etc. no effect.
OK.
Now I need to double check issue C1 not already covered by design docs: requirement says "A automação é idempotente: não deve duplicar evento pendente já existente para o mesmo contexto." and "O fluxo permanece customizável após criado". The design assumes one draft per worker pending, then transmitted. Rehire after transmit: The S-2200 admission for rehire will occur, and S-2299 for new term; when automation runs, latest S-2299 is the transmitted one → no new draft. That's a real gap.
Let me now also verify how the eSocial tab "desligamento" shows events & whether there's existing "pending draft editable" logic that the automation might clobber, e.g., `EsocialEvents` base class with `status`. Let me quickly search EsocialEvents class for status constants to name statuses precisely.
Vou verificar a entidade base `EsocialEvents` para entender os status e confirmar o comportamento de transmissão.
Tool Calls (2)
file_find
Show Details
Arguments
{"query_name": "EsocialEvents"}
Result
src/Controller/EsocialEventsController.php src/Entity/EsocialEvents.php
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Entity/EsocialEvents.php"], "search_text": "status|pendente|transmit"}
Result
No matches found
Request #20
deepseek-v4-flash
P:92.17K C:143 CR:92.03K CW:0
2197ms
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Entity/EsocialEvents.php"], "search_text": "pendente"}
Result
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/EsocialEventsController.php", "src/Controller/CompanyController.php"], "search_text": "setStatus\\("}
Result
No matches found
Request #21
deepseek-v4-flash
P:92.33K C:177 CR:92.29K CW:0
2372ms
Reasoning
Not finding; the base class EsocialEvents stores status maybe as a property not necessarily string 'pendente'. Let's read EsocialEvents quickly for status property and how it's set (values).
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Entity/EsocialEvents.php"], "search_text": "private \\$status"}
Result
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/"], "search_text": "EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento"}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 9
40|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
14984| if ($latestEvent instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $latestEvent->getStatus() !== 'pendente') {
14987| } elseif ($latestEvent instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
14992| $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
15035| if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
15057| 'message' => $event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable'
15146| private function findLatestEsocialS2299Event(EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
15149| ->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
15156| private function applyEsocialS2299Payload(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $event, array $payload): void
File: src/Service/FlowableServices/FlowableVariablesService.php
Match lines: 7
15168| * Template: EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento (S-2299 - Desligamento)
15174| * @param int $eventId ID do evento (EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento)
15179| $repository = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class);
18943| \App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class => ['s2299', 'Desligamento'],
19097| \App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class => ['s2299', 'Desligamento'],
19326| \App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class => ['s2299', 'Desligamento'],
19700| $s2299Repo = $em->getRepository(\App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class);
Request #22
deepseek-v4-flash
P:93.03K C:142 CR:92.42K CW:0
1886ms
Reasoning
Let me find where status is set to non-pendente (transmission). Search for `'pendente'` in the codebase to know status values.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "'pendente'"}
Result
Note: The results have been truncated. Only showing first 100 results.
File: docs/finance/06-budgets-module.md
Match lines: 3
73|private string $status = 'Pendente'; // Status: Pendente, Aprovado, Execução, Encerrado
133| └─ Status = 'Pendente'
533|$budget->setStatus('Pendente');
File: docs/ia/CHAT_IA_DOCUMENTATION.md
Match lines: 2
2025| $solicitacao->setStatus('pendente');
2070| ->findBy(['gestor' => $user, 'status' => 'pendente']);
File: fix_encoding_kpi.py
Match lines: 2
35| if ($d->getStatus() === 'pendente') $pendentes++;
60| if ($dv->getStatus() === 'pendente') $pendentesVinculo++;
File: migration_archive_20260508/Version20250826124601.php
Match lines: 1
238| status ENUM('Pendente', 'Aprovado', 'Rejeitado') NOT NULL,
File: migration_archive_20260508/Version20260311120000_UnifyFinancialHubMigrations.php
Match lines: 1
337| $this->addSql("UPDATE budgets SET status = 'Aguardando aprovação' WHERE status IN ('Pendente', 'pendente')");
File: migration_archive_20260508/_archive_ssma/Version20260424235900.php
Match lines: 2
26| ADD COLUMN status_requisito VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL DEFAULT 'pendente'");
35| status VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL DEFAULT 'pendente',
File: migrations/Version20260508141500.php
Match lines: 1
340| $this->addSql("UPDATE budgets SET status = 'Aguardando aprovação' WHERE status IN ('Pendente', 'pendente')");
File: migrations/Version20260519120000_EsocialPayrollRubricaCatalog.php
Match lines: 1
190| 'status' => 'pendente',
File: public/finances/common.js
Match lines: 7
4198| { id: 'Pendente', name: 'Pendente' },
4269| { value: 'Pendente', text: 'Pendente' },
4281| $statusSelect.val('Pendente').trigger('change');
5002| const status = b.status || 'Pendente';
5096| const status = b.status || 'Pendente';
5176| const status = b.status || 'Pendente';
5425| $('#status').val(rowData.status || 'Pendente').trigger('change');
File: public/js/chat_ia/ata.js
Match lines: 1
873| : 'Pendente';
File: public/js/esocial_config/esocial.js
Match lines: 3
941| tooltipMessage = 'Pendente';
973| tooltipMessage = 'Pendente';
1004| tooltipMessage = 'Pendente';
File: public/js/feedback_page.js
Match lines: 1
1993| console.log(` ✨ Card renderizado para task: ${taskTitle} (ID: ${task.id}) - Status: ${isComplete ? 'COMPLETO' : 'PENDENTE'}`);
File: public/js/governance/governance-authorization-view-monitoring.js
Match lines: 3
271| return doc && String(doc.status || '').toLowerCase() === 'pendente';
288| return String(doc.status || '').toLowerCase() === 'pendente';
296| && String(doc.status || '').toLowerCase() === 'pendente'
File: public/js/governance/member-pendencies-update-document.js
Match lines: 1
517| $('#memberPendencyUpdateDocumentStatus').text(ctx.statusLabel || 'Pendente');
File: public/js/offboarding/visualizar_atividades.js
Match lines: 1
1980| const metricOneText = offboardingMember.letterSent ? 'Enviada' : 'Pendente';
File: public/js/people-analytics/modules/diversity-inclusion-dashboard.js
Match lines: 2
407| status: 'Pendente',
427| status: 'Pendente',
File: public/js/people-analytics/modules/saude-organizacional-dashboard.js
Match lines: 4
165| summary: { label: 'Pendente', tone: 'warn', description: 'PGR vence em 23 dias · revisão necessária', delta: null, delta_type: 'neutral' },
169| { item: 'Treinamentos NR-1 para líderes', owner: 'SESMT / RH', deadline: '30 dias', status_key: 'pending', status_label: 'Pendente', observation: 'Há pendências em TI e Operações.' },
170| { item: 'Plano de ação por área crítica', owner: 'Lideranças / RH',deadline: '15 dias', status_key: 'pending', status_label: 'Pendente', observation: 'Ainda sem plano formalizado.' },
171| { item: 'Renovação do PGR', owner: 'SESMT', deadline: '15 dias', status_key: 'pending', status_label: 'Pendente', observation: 'Depende da conclusão dos itens.' },
File: public/js/services/CalendarModalService.js
Match lines: 1
4018| 'pending': 'Pendente',
File: src/Controller/Api/PeopleAnalytics/DiversityInclusionController.php
Match lines: 2
1207| ['obrigacao' => 'Lei 14.611/2023', 'exigencia' => 'Plano em caso de gap relevante', 'atual' => 'Monitoramento ativo', 'gap' => 'Acompanhar', 'gapType' => 'warn', 'status' => 'Pendente', 'statusKey' => 'warn', 'fiscalizacao' => 'Envio semestral'],
1208| ['obrigacao' => 'Autodeclaração racial', 'exigencia' => 'Cobertura >= 90%', 'atual' => $this->fmtPercent($coverage), 'gap' => $coverage >= 90 ? 'OK' : 'Cobertura insuficiente', 'gapType' => $coverage >= 90 ? 'ok' : 'warn', 'status' => $coverage >= 90 ? 'Conforme' : 'Pendente', 'statusKey' => $coverage >= 90 ? 'ok' : 'warn', 'fiscalizacao' => 'Atualização mensal'],
File: src/Controller/Api/PeopleAnalytics/OrganizationalHealthController.php
Match lines: 1
793| 'label' => 'Pendente',
File: src/Controller/CalendarMemberController.php
Match lines: 3
6424| 'status' => 'Pendente', // Projetos profissionais sempre pendentes
6537| 1 => 'Pendente',
6543| return $statusMap[$status] ?? 'Pendente';
File: src/Controller/CompanyController.php
Match lines: 3
6840| $status = $event->getStatus() ?? 'pendente';
6846| } elseif ($statusLower === 'pendente') {
6894| $statusGeral = 'Pendente';
File: src/Controller/CompanyMemberController.php
Match lines: 3
1958| $status = 'Pendente';
3777| return ['neutral', 'Pendente'];
4289| return 'Pendente';
File: src/Controller/Finance/PayrollFinanceController.php
Match lines: 8
1202| ->setParameter('buildStatuses', [self::SHEET_STATUS_BUILD, 'pendente', 'emitida', ''])
3436| $statusKey = 'pendente';
3437| $statusLabel = 'Pendente';
3537| default => trim($rawStatus) !== '' ? trim($rawStatus) : 'Pendente',
5627| if (in_array('pendente', $normalizedStatuses, true)) {
5628| $summary['statusKey'] = 'pendente';
5629| $summary['statusLabel'] = 'Pendente';
5671| return 'pendente';
File: src/Controller/GovernanceController.php
Match lines: 4
2728| 'status_requisito' => $vinculo?->getStatusRequisito() ?? 'pendente',
2838| 'status_requisito' => $vinculo?->getStatusRequisito() ?? 'pendente',
6024| if ($statusReal === 'vencida' || in_array($statusRequisito, ['expirado', 'pendente'], true)) {
6045| if ($statusRequisito === 'pendente') {
File: src/Controller/InnovationResearchController.php
Match lines: 4
846| $status = 'pendente';
866| $status = 'pendente';
887| $status = 'pendente';
942| $status = 'Pendente';
File: src/Controller/InvoiceController.php
Match lines: 1
1705| 'pending', 'created' => 'Pendente',
File: src/Controller/JobInterviewController.php
Match lines: 1
6554| 'pending' => 'Pendente',
File: src/Controller/LicenseController.php
Match lines: 1
3286| $licenseMember->setStatus('Pendente');
File: src/Controller/PayablesController.php
Match lines: 1
5574| 'pending' => 'Pendente',
File: src/Controller/PayrollController.php
Match lines: 4
310| // Aceita 'pendente' (legado) ou 'em_preparacao' (novo padrão)
311| if (!in_array($st, ['pendente', 'em_preparacao'], true)) {
711| if (!in_array($st, ['pendente', 'em_preparacao', 'emitida'], true)) {
749| if (!in_array($st, ['pendente', 'em_preparacao'], true)) {
File: src/Controller/ServicePackageController.php
Match lines: 1
291| $customService->setStatus('Pendente'); // Definir status inicial como 'Pendente'
File: src/Controller/SpecialistController.php
Match lines: 1
1182| $accountsHistoricalData->setStatus('Pendente');
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 2
2912| * - 'pendente': qualquer outra situação
2961| $vinculo->setStatusRequisito($todos ? 'valido' : 'pendente');
File: src/Controller/TemplatesController.php
Match lines: 2
4978| 'status' => 'Pendente'
4986| 'status' => 'Pendente'
File: src/Controller/WelfareReportController.php
Match lines: 1
155| 'status' => $hasAnswers ? 'Concluído' : 'Pendente',
File: src/Domains/FileManagement/v2/Service/Indexing/Classification/Rules/OperationalKeywordDocumentTypeRuleCatalog.php
Match lines: 1
258| new OperationalKeywordDocumentTypeRule('plano_de_acao', ['acao corretiva', 'acao de melhoria', 'causa raiz', 'prioridade', 'evidencias'], ['plano de acao', 'status', 'impacto', 'acompanhamento', 'concluido', 'pendente'], ['gestao', 'melhoria', 'projetos', 'desempenho', 'qualidade'], ['pdi', 'status report de projeto', 'aprovacao de reembolso', 'registro de acidente']),
File: src/Domains/FileManagement/v2/Service/Indexing/Classification/Rules/TrmTaskDocumentTypeRule.php
Match lines: 1
51| 'pendente', 'em andamento', 'concluida', 'cancelada', 'observacoes da tarefa',
File: src/Entity/CompanyFeaturesAddons.php
Match lines: 1
65| public const STATUS_PENDING = 'Pendente';
File: src/Entity/CreditsRequests.php
Match lines: 1
13| public const STATUS_PENDING = 'Pendente';
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2501EvtContProc.php
Match lines: 1
81| $this->status = 'pendente';
File: src/Entity/ExceptionRequest.php
Match lines: 1
463| self::STATUS_PENDING => 'Pendente',
File: src/Entity/FloorCheckin.php
Match lines: 1
275| self::STATUS_PENDING => 'Pendente',
File: src/Entity/GovernanceAuthorizationCollaborator.php
Match lines: 1
51| private string $statusRequisito = 'pendente';
File: src/Entity/GovernanceAuthorizationDocument.php
Match lines: 1
18| public const STATUS_PENDENTE = 'pendente';
File: src/Entity/InterviewAnswer.php
Match lines: 1
352| return 'Pendente';
File: src/Entity/NpsAnswer.php
Match lines: 1
350| return 'Pendente';
File: src/Entity/ProcessChat.php
Match lines: 1
356| self::STATUS_PENDING => 'Pendente',
File: src/Entity/TimeManegement/Tenant/Occurrence.php
Match lines: 1
34| public const STATUS_PENDING = 'pendente';
File: src/Finance/BudgetStatus.php
Match lines: 1
23| 'pendente' => self::AGUARDANDO_APROVACAO,
File: src/Form/CompanyCustomServiceAdminType.php
Match lines: 1
45| 'Pendente' => CompanyCustomService::STATUS_PENDING,
File: src/Repository/EsocialS1000EvtInfoEmpregadorRepository.php
Match lines: 1
97| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS1005EvtTabEstabRepository.php
Match lines: 1
106| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS1010EvtTabRubricaRepository.php
Match lines: 1
86| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS1020EvtTabLotacaoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
78| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS1070EvtTabProcessoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
73| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS1200EvtRemunRepository.php
Match lines: 1
71| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS1210EvtPgtosRepository.php
Match lines: 1
82| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS1280EvtInfoComplPerRepository.php
Match lines: 1
64| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS1298EvtReabreEvPerRepository.php
Match lines: 1
63| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS1299EvtFechaEvPerRepository.php
Match lines: 1
64| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2190EvtAdmPrelimRepository.php
Match lines: 1
65| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2200EvtAdmissaoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
65| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2205EvtAltCadastralRepository.php
Match lines: 1
61| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2206EvtAltContratualRepository.php
Match lines: 1
60| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2210EvtCATRepository.php
Match lines: 1
70| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2220EvtMonitRepository.php
Match lines: 1
74| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2221EvtExmToxMotRepository.php
Match lines: 1
69| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2230EvtAfastTempRepository.php
Match lines: 1
69| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2240EvtExpRiscoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
74| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2298EvtReintegrRepository.php
Match lines: 1
71| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
73| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2300EvtTsvInicioRepository.php
Match lines: 1
63| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2306EvtTsvAltContrRepository.php
Match lines: 1
68| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2399EvtTsvTerminoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
73| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2500EvtProcTrabRepository.php
Match lines: 1
57| $evento->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2501EvtContProcRepository.php
Match lines: 1
79| $evento->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS3000EvtExclusaoRepository.php
Match lines: 1
61| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/EsocialS3500EvtExcProcTrabRepository.php
Match lines: 1
61| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Repository/SpecialistRepository.php
Match lines: 1
94| ->setParameter('status', 'Pendente')
File: src/Service/Ata/Preview/AtaRefundPreviewService.php
Match lines: 1
42| $recibo = !empty($r['link_recibo']) ? 'ok' : 'pendente';
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 14
642| (string) ($validation['statusKey'] ?? 'pendente'),
651| 'statusKey' => (string) ($validation['statusKey'] ?? 'pendente'),
652| 'statusLabel' => (string) ($validation['statusLabel'] ?? 'Pendente'),
1437| 'pendente'
1514| $statusKey = (string) ($validation['statusKey'] ?? 'pendente');
1766| ? sprintf('%s ainda não está enviado/processado. Status atual: %s', $code, $rawStatus !== '' ? $rawStatus : 'pendente')
1844| $statusKey = $ready ? 'enviado' : 'pendente';
1955| return 'pendente';
1966| default => trim($rawStatus) !== '' ? trim($rawStatus) : 'Pendente',
2066| string $statusKey = 'pendente',
2091| string $statusKey = 'pendente'
2095| $statusKey = trim($statusKey) !== '' ? trim($statusKey) : 'pendente';
14984| if ($latestEvent instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $latestEvent->getStatus() !== 'pendente') {
15000| $event->setStatus('pendente');
File: src/Service/CalendarEventMapperService.php
Match lines: 1
1068| \App\Entity\SpaceBooking::STATUS_PENDING => 'Pendente',
File: src/Service/CalendarMemberGenerator.php
Match lines: 2
1006| 1 => 'Pendente',
1040| 'status' => $statusMap[$task->getStatus()] ?? 'Pendente',
File: src/Service/Chat/ChatDataSourceService.php
Match lines: 1
513| $status = 'Pendente';
File: src/Service/ChatMarkerMemberService.php
Match lines: 7
1259| ELSE 'pendente'
1279| 'pendente' as status
1301| ELSE 'pendente'
1340| $priority = ['concluida' => 3, 'em_andamento' => 2, 'pendente' => 1];
1569| $statusLabel = 'pendente';
1774| 1 => 'pendente',
2084| 'pendente' => '⏺️',
File: src/Service/Effectiveness/Behavioral/BehavioralActionNormalizer.php
Match lines: 1
650| 'status_label' => $isEvaluated ? 'Avaliada' : 'Pendente',
File: src/Service/Effectiveness/Leadership/LeadershipEffectivenessAnalyzer.php
Match lines: 1
2977| return $status !== '' && !str_contains($status, 'não avaliada') && !str_contains($status, 'pendente');
File: src/Service/EsocialAdminNotificationService.php
Match lines: 1
47| ->setParameter('status', 'pendente')
File: src/Service/EsocialCompanyRubricaService.php
Match lines: 2
231| $criteria = ['company' => $company, 'status' => 'pendente'];
239| if (mb_strtolower((string) ($rubrica->getStatus() ?? '')) !== 'pendente') {
File: src/Service/FlowableServices/FlowableVariablesService.php
Match lines: 4
12326| 'label' => 'Pendente',
12995| 'label' => 'Pendente',
13354| 'label' => 'Pendente',
18907| ->setParameter('status', 'pendente')
File: src/Service/FlowableServices/LicenseFormatterService.php
Match lines: 1
390| ['value' => 'Pendente', 'label' => 'Pendente'],
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationComplianceViewService.php
Match lines: 2
1619| if ($statusReal === 'vencida' || in_array($statusRequisito, ['expirado', 'pendente'], true)) {
1637| if ($statusRequisito === 'pendente') {
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationMonitoringNotificationService.php
Match lines: 1
215| if ($statusRequisito === 'pendente') {
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceAuthorizationStatusService.php
Match lines: 2
36| $vinculo->setStatusRequisito('pendente');
65| $vinculo->setStatusRequisito($allMet ? 'valido' : 'pendente');
File: src/Service/Governance/GovernanceMemberPendenciesService.php
Match lines: 2
21| public const STATUS_PENDENTE = 'pendente';
750| default => 'Pendente',
File: src/Service/Home/HomeSsmaActivityCardService.php
Match lines: 1
389| return ['neutral', 'Pendente'];
File: src/Service/JobListingService.php
Match lines: 1
447| 'label' => 'Pendente',
File: src/Service/MetaHuman/GovernanceCasesActiveExampleSeeder.php
Match lines: 1
187| $link->setStatusRequisito('pendente');
File: src/Service/MetaHuman/GovernanceCasesExampleAuthorizationSeeder.php
Match lines: 1
177| $link->setStatusRequisito('pendente');
File: src/Service/MetaHuman/GovernanceCasesHubService.php
Match lines: 1
7287| if (strtolower((string) ($documentRow['status'] ?? '')) === 'pendente') {
File: src/Service/OperationalCenterService.php
Match lines: 12
184| 'status' => 'Pendente',
191| 'uncheckedStatus' => 'Pendente',
268| return ['Pendente', 'neutral', false];
333| return ['Pendente', 'neutral', false];
407| 'status' => 'Pendente',
414| 'uncheckedStatus' => 'Pendente',
448| 'status' => 'Pendente',
455| 'uncheckedStatus' => 'Pendente',
487| 'status' => 'Pendente',
494| 'uncheckedStatus' => 'Pendente',
537| 'status' => 'Pendente',
544| 'uncheckedStatus' => 'Pendente',
File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/BehavioralIndicatorActionPlanApplicationService.php
Match lines: 1
445| 'status_label' => $evaluation !== null ? 'Avaliada' : 'Pendente',
File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/DynamicFilterService.php
Match lines: 1
1217| ['value' => 'pending', 'label' => 'Pendente'],
File: src/Service/PeopleAnalytics/Metadata/MemberAnalysisMetadata.php
Match lines: 1
110| ['value' => 'pendente', 'label' => 'Pendente'],
File: src/Service/SafetyEnvironmentService.php
Match lines: 3
470| default => 'Pendente',
1023| 'status' => 'Pendente',
1119| MaintenanceIncident::STATUS_OPEN => 'Pendente',
File: src/Service/SpaceBookingCalendarSyncService.php
Match lines: 1
463| SpaceBooking::STATUS_PENDING => 'Pendente',
File: src/Service/Ssma/Effectiveness/SecurityActionEffectivenessPresenter.php
Match lines: 1
1246| 'pending', 'pendente' => 'Pendente',
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAdrianaConversationGuide.php
Match lines: 1
844| && (str_contains($m, 'ainda preciso') || str_contains($m, 'pendente'));
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaPanelAnalyticsService.php
Match lines: 1
22| $byStatus = ['aberta' => 0, 'pendente' => 0, 'finalizada' => 0];
File: src/Service/TeamInterviewReportGenerator.php
Match lines: 1
290| 'pending' => 'Pendente',
File: src/Service/TeamNpsReportGenerator.php
Match lines: 1
230| 'pending' => 'Pendente',
File: src/Service/TimeManagement/TimeManagementService.php
Match lines: 1
4632| AND o.status = 'pendente'
File: src/Service/Trm/TrmAiService.php
Match lines: 1
171| 'badge' => $daysSince > 60 ? 'Urgente' : 'Pendente',
File: src/Service/ai_committee/Snapshot/OffboardingMemberSnapshotMapper.php
Match lines: 2
360| 'status' => $signedUrl !== '' ? 'assinado' : 'pendente',
389| 'status' => 'pendente',
File: src/Service/ai_committee/SpecializedCommitteeEvidenceGate.php
Match lines: 1
182| return $s !== '' && !\in_array($s, ['0', 'false', 'nao', 'não', 'ausente', 'pendente'], true);
File: src/Service/ai_committee/SpecializedCommitteeSessionDashboardDataResolver.php
Match lines: 1
4383| default => 'Pendente',
File: src/Service/ai_committee/SpecializedCommitteeSessionLaudoDashboardAssembler.php
Match lines: 1
2240| default => 'Pendente',
File: templates/cognitive_assessment/map_integrations/assessments_relacionados.html.twig
Match lines: 1
151| console.log(`${assessmentKey}: ${isCompleted ? 'COMPLETO' : 'PENDENTE'}`);
File: templates/cognitive_assessment/reports/components/acompanhamento_pesquisa.html.twig
Match lines: 1
96| {{ member.status ? 'Respondido' : 'Pendente' }}
File: templates/company/_autorizacoes_javascript.html.twig
Match lines: 5
813| return doc && String(doc.status || '').toLowerCase() === 'pendente';
824| return String(doc.status || '').toLowerCase() === 'pendente';
833| && String(doc.status || '').toLowerCase() === 'pendente'
1000| return { className: 'mhs-pill--yellow', label: 'Pendente', alert: null };
1540| if (className === 'mhs-pill--red' || label === 'Pendente') {
File: templates/company/esocial_member.html.twig
Match lines: 1
181| } else if (statusLower === 'pendente') {
File: templates/company/esocial_workflow.html.twig
Match lines: 1
415| return 'Pendente';
File: templates/company/manage_companies.html.twig
Match lines: 1
55| label: 'Pendente',
File: templates/company/members_v2.html.twig
Match lines: 1
1386| var statusLabel = row.status === 'success' ? 'Sucesso' : (row.status === 'error' ? 'Erro' : 'Pendente');
File: templates/cultural_hub/newsletter/newsletter_tabs/publish.html.twig
Match lines: 1
115| {% set statusText = 'Pendente' %}
File: templates/decision_system/modals/_candidate_offcanvas.html.twig
Match lines: 1
1391| var esocialStatusKey = (item.statusKey || 'pendente').toLowerCase();
File: templates/evaluator/managerEvaluatorRequest.html.twig
Match lines: 1
828| "<li><strong>Status:</strong> Filtre solicitações por status, como 'Pendente' ou 'Concluído'.</li>" +
File: templates/free-trial/company_activation_companies.html.twig
Match lines: 1
52| 'label': 'Pendente',
File: templates/governance/member/pendencies/index.html.twig
Match lines: 1
12| { value: 'pendente', text: 'Pendente' },
File: templates/innovation/user_research_list.html.twig
Match lines: 1
306| {% set status = 'pendente' %}
File: templates/license/individual_license_request.html.twig
Match lines: 1
696| if (data.status === 'Pendente') {
File: templates/license/individual_license_request_default.html.twig
Match lines: 1
760| if (data.status === 'Pendente') {
File: templates/member_research/index.html.twig
Match lines: 1
14|{% set status_order = ['A responder', 'Em andamento', 'Respondido', 'Pendente', 'Encerrada'] %}
File: templates/new_home/manager_home.html.twig
Match lines: 3
34| 'Pendente': 'gray',
335| uncheckedStatusDefault: 'Pendente'
372| uncheckedStatusDefault: 'Pendente'
File: templates/new_home/member_home.html.twig
Match lines: 3
71| 'Pendente': 'gray',
167| uncheckedStatusDefault: 'Pendente'
200| uncheckedStatusDefault: 'Pendente'
File: templates/new_home/partials/_operational_task_card.html.twig
Match lines: 1
15|{% set uncheckedStatusDefault = uncheckedStatusDefault|default('Pendente') %}
File: templates/payables/payroll/_rubricas_embed.html.twig
Match lines: 1
1252| return String(row.status || '').toLowerCase() === 'pendente';
File: templates/payables/payroll/form_embedded.html.twig
Match lines: 1
2386| status: 'Pendente',
File: templates/payables/payroll/form_fragment.html.twig
Match lines: 1
2361| status: 'Pendente',
File: templates/process/tabs/_tab_profissionals_dash_individual_performance.html.twig
Match lines: 1
938| } else if (text.includes('pendente')) {
File: templates/process_chat/chat_interface.html.twig
Match lines: 1
2006| assessment.status === 'in-progress' ? 'Em Andamento' : 'Pendente';
File: templates/spaces_control/book_room/index.html.twig
Match lines: 1
1014| statusText = 'Pendente';
File: templates/spaces_control/realtime/floor_plan.html.twig
Match lines: 1
3243| 'pending': 'Pendente',
File: templates/sst_config/index.html.twig
Match lines: 2
1791| { id: 2, nome: 'Maria Santos', dataAcidente: '20/01/2025', tipoAcidente: 'Corte', statusEsocial: 'Pendente' },
1816| { id: 3, nome: 'Camila Costa', cpf: '888.999.000-11', status: 'Pendente' },
File: templates/sst_exam/components/_tab_scheduling.html.twig
Match lines: 9
7| {'value': 'pendente', 'text': 'Pendente'}
26| {% set status_code = 'pendente' %}
27| {% set status_label = 'Pendente' %}
38| {% set status_code = has_result ? 'finalizado' : 'pendente' %}
39| {% set status_label = has_result ? 'Finalizado' : 'Pendente' %}
71| {% if status_code not in ['agendado', 'pendente'] %}disabled aria-disabled="true"{% endif %}
843| return { code: 'pendente', label: 'Pendente' };
854| return hasResult ? { code: 'finalizado', label: 'Finalizado' } : { code: 'pendente', label: 'Pendente' };
912| const canReschedule = statusCode === 'agendado' || statusCode === 'pendente';
File: templates/sst_exam/components/historico.html.twig
Match lines: 8
5| {'value': 'pendente', 'text': 'Pendente'}
10| {'value': 'pendente', 'text': 'Pendente'},
33| {% set result_label = 'Pendente' %}
34| {% set result_code = 'pendente' %}
40| {% set aso_label = 'Pendente' %}
41| {% set aso_code = 'pendente' %}
623| return 'Pendente';
634| return { label: 'Pendente', code: 'pendente' };
File: templates/structural_research/user_structural_research_list.html.twig
Match lines: 4
327| {% set status = 'pendente' %}
328| {% set statusText = 'Pendente' %}
340| {% set status = 'pendente' %}
341| {% set statusText = 'Pendente' %}
File: templates/templates/avaliator_panel_projects.html.twig
Match lines: 4
1204| } else if (latestStatus === 'Pendente') {
1283| const status = historicalData.status || 'PENDENTE';
1328| $('#receipt-status').text('PENDENTE').removeClass().addClass('badge badge-warning p-2');
1338| case 'PENDENTE':
File: templates/templates/eSocial_event_forms/event_s_2190_form.html.twig
Match lines: 1
86| event_status: 'Pendente',
File: templates/templates/eSocial_event_forms/event_s_2200_form.html.twig
Match lines: 1
602| event_status: 'Pendente',
File: templates/templates/eSocial_events_management.html.twig
Match lines: 3
418| if (selectedStatus === 'pendente') {
419| return eventStatus === 'pendente' || eventStatus === 'nao processado' || eventStatus === 'não processado';
478| var pendingEvents = data.filter(event => normalizeEventStatus(event.status) === 'pendente').length;
File: templates/templates/esocial_config_empregador.twig
Match lines: 2
325| case 'pendente':
326| status = 'nao-enviado'; // Mapeia 'pendente' para 'não enviado'
File: templates/templates/events_table_processos/s2500Table.html.twig
Match lines: 2
127| 'pendente': 'warning',
131| return `<span class="badge badge-${statusClass}">${data || 'pendente'}</span>`;
File: templates/templates/events_table_processos/s2501Table.html.twig
Match lines: 2
105| 'pendente': 'warning',
109| return `<span class="badge badge-${statusClass}">${data || 'pendente'}</span>`;
File: templates/templates/events_table_sst/questionariosRealizadosTable.html.twig
Match lines: 5
96| 'pendente': { status: 'pending', label: 'Pendente de Envio' },
117| 'statusBackend': evento.status ?? 'pendente'
132| 'statusBackend': evento.status ?? 'pendente'
147| 'statusBackend': evento.status ?? 'pendente'
162| 'statusBackend': evento.status ?? 'pendente'
File: templates/templates/events_table_sst/s2210Table.html.twig
Match lines: 1
473| 'status': 'Pendente',
File: templates/templates/events_table_sst/s2220Table.html.twig
Match lines: 1
304| 'status': evento.status ?? 'Pendente',
File: templates/templates/events_table_sst/s2221Table.html.twig
Match lines: 1
194| 'status': evento.status ?? 'Pendente'
File: templates/templates/events_table_sst/s2240Table.html.twig
Match lines: 1
442| 'status': evento.status ?? 'Pendente'
File: templates/templates/interviewer_panel_projects.html.twig
Match lines: 4
988| } else if (latestStatus === 'Pendente') {
1054| : 'PENDENTE';
1116| $('#receipt-status').text('PENDENTE').removeClass().addClass('badge badge-warning p-2');
1126| case 'PENDENTE':
File: templates/templates/licenses_requests_approval.html.twig
Match lines: 2
208| {% if request.licenca.status in ['Aprovado', 'Rejeitado', 'Pendente', 'Cancelado', 'Criado/Aprovado', 'EditCriado'] %}
314| if (['Aprovado', 'Rejeitado', 'Pendente', 'Cancelado', 'Criado/Aprovado', 'EditCriado'].includes(status)) {
File: templates/templates/payment_management.html.twig
Match lines: 2
693|if (payment.status === 'Pendente') {
700|if (payment.status === 'Pendente') {
File: templates/templates/payroll_details.html.twig
Match lines: 2
229| {% if payrollData.status == 'Pendente' or payrollData.status == 'em_preparacao' %}
397|// status: 'Pendente',
File: templates/templates/payroll_form.html.twig
Match lines: 1
2382| status: 'Pendente',
File: templates/templates/specialists_management_accounts_historical.html.twig
Match lines: 3
1849| case 'Pendente':
1857| if (data === 'Pendente') { label = 'Aguardando pagamento'; }
2050| } else if (item.status === 'Pendente') {
File: templates/time-management/types/memberOccurrence.ts
Match lines: 1
77| 'pendente': 'pendente',
File: templates/time-management/utils/api/Tenant/overview.ts
Match lines: 1
29| * status: 'pendente'
File: tests/Command/RunPayrollScheduledAutomationsCommandTest.php
Match lines: 2
117| $s1200 = $this->createS1200($setup, 'pendente');
118| $s1210 = $this->createS1210($setup, 'pendente');
File: tests/Integration/Products/FinancialFlowBootstrapApiIntegrationTest.php
Match lines: 1
354| $status->setRefundStatus('pendente');
File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SafetyEnvironmentMemberSectionsServiceTest.php
Match lines: 1
154| self::assertSame('Pendente', $sections['execution'][0]['status'] ?? null);
File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php
Match lines: 1
469| 'description' => 'Pendente',
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Entity/EsocialEvents.php"], "search_text": "class EsocialEvents"}
Result
File: src/Entity/EsocialEvents.php Match lines: 1 74|abstract class EsocialEvents
Request #23
deepseek-v4-flash
P:102.81K C:217 CR:93.06K CW:0
3010ms
Reasoning
Statuses used: 'pendente' at creation. Other statuses like 'enviado'? When transmitted, they may set status 'enviado'/'processado'/'erro'. Let me check EsocialEventsController to see how statuses change after send. Search for getStatus and statuses in EsocialEventsController, or 'enviado' setStatus calls.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Controller/EsocialEventsController.php"], "search_text": "setStatus|getStatus|status"}
Result
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Entity/EsocialEvents.php"], "search_text": "status"}
Result
File: src/Entity/EsocialEvents.php Match lines: 5 147| private $status; 256| public function getStatus() 258| return $this->status; 261| public function setStatus($status): void 263| $this->status = $status;
Request #24
deepseek-v4-flash
P:103.11K C:194 CR:102.91K CW:0
2507ms
Reasoning
The status values are set elsewhere (probably queue consumers that set 'enviado', 'processado', 'erro', 'sucesso', etc.). Enough.
Now let's look at CompanyController around line 6373 and 6840 to understand event statuses and tabs (esocialTab). This informs whether notification flow ties to a route param `?esocialTab=desligamento`. Let's read that portion to verify the tab name 'desligamento' is a valid tab key used in company member manage.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 6900, "file_path": "src/Controller/CompanyController.php", "start_line": 6330}
Result
File: src/Controller/CompanyController.php (Total lines: 7133)
IS_TRUNCATED: true
LINE_RANGE: 6330-6829
6330| $evtS2230 = null;
6331| $evtS2399 = null;
6332| $evtS2298 = null;
6333| $evtS2200 = null;
6334| $evtS1200 = null;
6335|
6336| // Verifica se $trabalhador é um array e se tem dados
6337| if (empty($trabalhador) || !is_array($trabalhador) || !isset($trabalhador[0])) {
6338| return [
6339| 'desligamento' => $evtS2299,
6340| 'afastamento' => $evtS2230,
6341| 'termino' => $evtS2399,
6342| 'reintegracao' => $evtS2298,
6343| 'admissao' => $evtS2200,
6344| 'remuneracao' => $evtS1200,
6345| ];
6346| }
6347|
6348| // Obtém o ID do trabalhador - $trabalhador[0] é um array com dados formatados
6349| $trabalhadorId = $trabalhador[0]['id'] ?? null;
6350|
6351| if (!$trabalhadorId) {
6352| return [
6353| 'desligamento' => $evtS2299,
6354| 'afastamento' => $evtS2230,
6355| 'termino' => $evtS2399,
6356| 'reintegracao' => $evtS2298,
6357| 'admissao' => $evtS2200,
6358| 'remuneracao' => $evtS1200,
6359| ];
6360| }
6361|
6362| foreach ($events as $event) {
6363| if ($event instanceof EsocialS2200EvtAdmissao && $event->getEsocialTrabalhador() !== null) {
6364| $evt = $event->getEsocialTrabalhador()->getId();
6365| if ($evt === $trabalhadorId) {
6366| $evtS2200 = $event;
6367| }
6368| } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS1200EvtRemun && $event->getDadosRemuneracao() !== null && $event->getDadosRemuneracao()->getEsocialTrabalhador() !== null) {
6369| $evt = $event->getDadosRemuneracao()->getEsocialTrabalhador()->getId();
6370| if ($evt === $trabalhadorId) {
6371| $evtS1200 = $event;
6372| }
6373| } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $event->getEsocialTrabalhador() !== null) {
6374| $evt = $event->getEsocialTrabalhador()->getId();
6375| if ($evt === $trabalhadorId) {
6376| $evtS2299 = $event;
6377| }
6378| } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS2230EvtAfastTemp && $event->getEsocialTrabalhador() !== null) {
6379| $evt = $event->getEsocialTrabalhador()->getId();
6380| if ($evt === $trabalhadorId) {
6381| $evtS2230 = $event;
6382| }
6383| } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino && $event->getDadosRemuneracao()->getEsocialTrabalhador() !== null) {
6384| $evt = $event->getDadosRemuneracao()->getEsocialTrabalhador()->getId();
6385| if ($evt === $trabalhadorId) {
6386| $evtS2399 = $event;
6387| }
6388| } elseif ($event instanceof EsocialS2298EvtReintegr && $event->getEsocialTrabalhador() !== null) {
6389| $evt = $event->getEsocialTrabalhador()->getId();
6390| if ($evt === $trabalhadorId) {
6391| $evtS2298 = $event;
6392| }
6393| }
6394| }
6395|
6396| return [
6397| 'desligamento' => $evtS2299,
6398| 'afastamento' => $evtS2230,
6399| 'termino' => $evtS2399,
6400| 'reintegracao' => $evtS2298,
6401| 'admissao' => $evtS2200,
6402| 'remuneracao' => $evtS1200,
6403| ];
6404| }
6405|
6406| /**
6407| * Merge inteligente dos dados do eSocial com dados de fallback para exibição
6408| * Retorna array formatado para o frontend, priorizando dados existentes do eSocial
6409| */
6410| private function mergeEsocialTrabalhadorData($esocialData, $profileData): array
6411| {
6412| if (empty($esocialData)) {
6413| // Se não há dados do eSocial, retorna dados de fallback formatados
6414| return [$this->formatProfileData($profileData)];
6415| }
6416|
6417| // Se há dados do eSocial, retorna formatados (prioridade total para dados existentes)
6418| $formatted = $this->formatEsocialTrabalhadorData($esocialData);
6419|
6420| if ($profileData instanceof Profile) {
6421| foreach ($formatted as &$item) {
6422| if (!isset($item['dadosTrabalhador']) || !is_array($item['dadosTrabalhador'])) {
6423| continue;
6424| }
6425|
6426| if (empty($item['dadosTrabalhador']['fonePrinc'])) {
6427| $item['dadosTrabalhador']['fonePrinc'] = $profileData->getPhone() ?? '';
6428| }
6429|
6430| if (empty($item['dadosTrabalhador']['emailPrinc'])) {
6431| $item['dadosTrabalhador']['emailPrinc'] = $profileData->getEmail() ?? '';
6432| }
6433| }
6434| unset($item);
6435| }
6436|
6437| return $formatted;
6438| }
6439|
6440| /**
6441| * Formata dados de fallback para exibição no frontend
6442| * Estrutura similar ao formatEsocialTrabalhadorData
6443| */
6444| private function formatProfileData($profileData): array
6445| {
6446| if (!$profileData instanceof Profile) {
6447| $profileData = null;
6448| }
6449|
6450| return [
6451| 'dadosTrabalhador' => [
6452| 'nmTrab' => $profileData ? trim($profileData->getFirstName() . ' ' . $profileData->getLastName()) : '',
6453| 'cpfTrab' => $profileData?->getCpf() ?? '',
6454| 'sexo' => $profileData ? $this->getCodigoSexo($profileData->getGenero()) : '',
6455| 'dtNascto' => $profileData?->getNascimento(),
6456| 'nmSoc' => $profileData?->getNomeSocial() ?? '',
6457| 'fonePrinc' => $profileData?->getPhone() ?? '',
6458| 'emailPrinc' => $profileData?->getEmail() ?? '',
6459| 'racaCor' => '',
6460| 'estCiv' => '',
6461| 'grauInstr' => '',
6462| 'paisNascto' => $profileData ? $this->getCodigoPaisBrasil($profileData->getNationality()) : '',
6463| 'paisNac' => $profileData ? $this->getCodigoPaisBrasil($profileData->getNationality()) : '',
6464| 'dtAltDadosPessoais' => null,
6465| 'numeroCnh' => '',
6466| 'categoriaCnh' => '',
6467| 'dtValidadeCnh' => null,
6468| ],
6469| 'endereco' => [
6470| 'brasil' => [
6471| 'tpLograd' => '',
6472| 'dscLograd' => $profileData?->getAddress() ?? '',
6473| 'nrLograd' => $profileData?->getAddressNumber() ?? '',
6474| 'complemento' => $profileData?->getComplemento() ?? '',
6475| 'bairro' => $profileData?->getNeighborhood() ?? '',
6476| 'cep' => '',
6477| 'codMunic' => '',
6478| 'uf' => $profileData ? $this->getCodigoEstado($profileData->getState()) : '',
6479| 'cidade' => $profileData?->getCity() ?? '',
6480| ],
6481| 'exterior' => [
6482| 'paisResid' => '',
6483| 'dscLograd' => '',
6484| 'nrLograd' => '',
6485| 'complemento' => '',
6486| 'bairro' => '',
6487| 'nmCid' => '',
6488| 'codPostal' => '',
6489| ],
6490| ],
6491| 'trabImigrante' => [
6492| 'tmpResid' => '',
6493| 'condIng' => '',
6494| ],
6495| 'infoDeficiencia' => [
6496| 'defFisica' => '',
6497| 'defVisual' => '',
6498| 'defAuditiva' => '',
6499| 'defMental' => '',
6500| 'defIntelectual' => '',
6501| 'reabReadap' => '',
6502| 'infoCota' => '',
6503| 'observacao' => '',
6504| ],
6505| 'dependente' => [],
6506| 'vinculo' => [
6507| 'matricula' => '',
6508| 'tpRegTrab' => '',
6509| 'tpRegPrev' => '',
6510| 'cadIni' => '',
6511| 'dtAdmCeletista' => null,
6512| 'tpAdmissaoCeletista' => '',
6513| 'indAdmissaoCeletista' => '',
6514| 'nrProcTrabCeletista' => '',
6515| 'tpRegJorCeletista' => '',
6516| 'natAtividadeCeletista' => '',
6517| 'dtBaseCeletista' => null,
6518| 'cnpjSindCategProfCeletista' => '',
6519| 'matAnotJudCeletista' => '',
6520| 'dtOpcFGTS' => null,
6521| 'hipLeg' => '',
6522| 'justContr' => '',
6523| 'justProrr' => '',
6524| 'tpInscEstabVinc' => '',
6525| 'nrInscEstabVinc' => '',
6526| 'cpfTrabSubst' => [],
6527| 'indAprend' => '',
6528| 'cnpjEntQualAprend' => '',
6529| 'tpInscAprend' => '',
6530| 'nrInscAprend' => '',
6531| 'cnpjPratAprend' => '',
6532| 'tpProvEstatutario' => '',
6533| 'dtExercicioEstatutario' => null,
6534| 'tpPlanRPEstatutario' => '',
6535| 'indTetoRGPSEstatutario' => '',
6536| 'indAbonoPermEstatutario' => '',
6537| 'dtIniAbonoEstatutario' => null,
6538| ],
6539| 'contrato' => [
6540| 'nmCargo' => '',
6541| 'CBOCargo' => '',
6542| 'dtIngrCargo' => null,
6543| 'nmFuncao' => '',
6544| 'CBOFuncao' => '',
6545| 'acumCargo' => '',
6546| 'codCategContrato' => '',
6547| 'vrSalFx' => '',
6548| 'undSalFixo' => '',
6549| 'dscSalVar' => '',
6550| 'tpContr' => '',
6551| 'dtTerm' => null,
6552| 'clauAssec' => '',
6553| 'qtdHrsSem' => null,
6554| 'tpJornada' => '',
6555| 'tmpParc' => null,
6556| 'horNoturno' => '',
6557| 'objDet' => '',
6558| 'dscJorn' => '',
6559| 'nrProcJudAlvara' => '',
6560| 'observacao' => [],
6561| 'codTreiCap' => [],
6562| 'tpInscSucessaoVinc' => '',
6563| 'nrInscSucessaoVinc' => '',
6564| 'matricAntSucessaoVinc' => '',
6565| 'dtTransfSucessaoVinc' => null,
6566| 'observacaoSucessaoVinc' => '',
6567| 'cpfSubstituidoTransfDom' => '',
6568| 'matricAntTransfDom' => '',
6569| 'dtTransfDom' => null,
6570| 'cpfAntMudancaCPF' => '',
6571| 'matricAntMudancaCPF' => '',
6572| 'dtAltCPFMudancaCPF' => null,
6573| 'observacaoMudancaCPF' => '',
6574| 'isLocalTrabDom' => false,
6575| 'tpInsclocalTrabGeral' => '',
6576| 'nrInscLocalTrabGeral' => '',
6577| 'descCompLocalTrabGeral' => '',
6578| ],
6579| 'desligEAfast' => [
6580| 'dtIniAfast' => null,
6581| 'codMotAfast' => '',
6582| 'dtDeslig' => null,
6583| 'dtIniCessao' => null,
6584| ],
6585| 'trabSemVinculo' => [
6586| 'categOrigDirSindical' => '',
6587| 'tpInscDirSindical' => '',
6588| 'nrInscDirSindical' => '',
6589| 'dtAdmOrig' => null,
6590| 'matricOrig' => '',
6591| 'tpRegTrabDirSindical' => '',
6592| 'tpRegPrevDirSindical' => '',
6593| 'categOrigCedido' => '',
6594| 'cnpjCednt' => '',
6595| 'matricCed' => '',
6596| 'dtAdmCed' => null,
6597| 'tpRegTrabCed' => '',
6598| 'tpRegPrevCed' => '',
6599| 'categOrigMandElet' => '',
6600| 'cnpjOrigMandElet' => '',
6601| 'matricOrigMandElet' => '',
6602| 'dtExercOrigMandElet' => null,
6603| 'indRemunCargo' => '',
6604| 'tpRegTrabMandElet' => '',
6605| 'tpRegPrevMandElet' => '',
6606| 'natEstagio' => '',
6607| 'nivEstagio' => '',
6608| 'areaAtuacao' => '',
6609| 'nrApol' => '',
6610| 'dtPrevTermEstagio' => null,
6611| 'cnpjInstEnsino' => '',
6612| 'nmRazao' => '',
6613| 'dscLogradInstEnsino' => '',
6614| 'nrLogradInstEnsino' => '',
6615| 'bairroInstEnsino' => '',
6616| 'cepInstEnsino' => '',
6617| 'codMunicInstEnsino' => '',
6618| 'ufInstEnsino' => '',
6619| 'cnpjAgntInteg' => '',
6620| 'cpfSupervisorEstagio' => '',
6621| ],
6622| 'isTrabalhadorSemVinculo' => false,
6623| ];
6624| }
6625|
6626| /**
6627| * Retorna o código do Brasil se a nacionalidade for brasileira, senão retorna vazio
6628| */
6629| private function getCodigoPaisBrasil($nacionalidade): string
6630| {
6631| if (empty($nacionalidade)) {
6632| return '';
6633| }
6634|
6635| $nacionalidadeLower = strtolower(trim($nacionalidade));
6636|
6637| // Verificar se é brasileiro
6638| if (in_array($nacionalidadeLower, ['brasil', 'brazil', 'br', 'brasileiro', 'brasileira'])) {
6639| return '105'; // Código do Brasil no eSocial
6640| }
6641|
6642| return '';
6643| }
6644|
6645| /**
6646| * Retorna o código do sexo baseado no gênero do Profile
6647| */
6648| private function getCodigoSexo($genero): string
6649| {
6650| if (empty($genero)) {
6651| return '';
6652| }
6653|
6654| $generoLower = strtolower(trim($genero));
6655|
6656| // Mapeamento de gênero para código do eSocial
6657| if (in_array($generoLower, ['masculino', 'm', 'male', 'homem'])) {
6658| return 'M';
6659| }
6660|
6661| if (in_array($generoLower, ['feminino', 'f', 'female', 'mulher'])) {
6662| return 'F';
6663| }
6664|
6665| if (in_array($generoLower, ['outro', 'o', 'other'])) {
6666| return 'O';
6667| }
6668|
6669| if (in_array($generoLower, ['não informado', 'n', 'nao informado', 'not informed'])) {
6670| return 'N';
6671| }
6672|
6673| return '';
6674| }
6675|
6676| /**
6677| * Retorna o código do estado baseado no state do Profile
6678| */
6679| private function getCodigoEstado($state): string
6680| {
6681| if (empty($state)) {
6682| return '';
6683| }
6684|
6685| $stateUpper = strtoupper(trim($state));
6686|
6687| // Mapeamento de estados brasileiros
6688| $estados = [
6689| 'AC' => 'AC', 'ACRE' => 'AC',
6690| 'AL' => 'AL', 'ALAGOAS' => 'AL',
6691| 'AP' => 'AP', 'AMAPA' => 'AP', 'AMAPÁ' => 'AP',
6692| 'AM' => 'AM', 'AMAZONAS' => 'AM',
6693| 'BA' => 'BA', 'BAHIA' => 'BA',
6694| 'CE' => 'CE', 'CEARA' => 'CE', 'CEARÁ' => 'CE',
6695| 'DF' => 'DF', 'DISTRITO FEDERAL' => 'DF',
6696| 'ES' => 'ES', 'ESPIRITO SANTO' => 'ES', 'ESPÍRITO SANTO' => 'ES',
6697| 'GO' => 'GO', 'GOIAS' => 'GO', 'GOIÁS' => 'GO',
6698| 'MA' => 'MA', 'MARANHAO' => 'MA', 'MARANHÃO' => 'MA',
6699| 'MT' => 'MT', 'MATO GROSSO' => 'MT',
6700| 'MS' => 'MS', 'MATO GROSSO DO SUL' => 'MS',
6701| 'MG' => 'MG', 'MINAS GERAIS' => 'MG',
6702| 'PA' => 'PA', 'PARA' => 'PA', 'PARÁ' => 'PA',
6703| 'PB' => 'PB', 'PARAIBA' => 'PB', 'PARAÍBA' => 'PB',
6704| 'PR' => 'PR', 'PARANA' => 'PR', 'PARANÁ' => 'PR',
6705| 'PE' => 'PE', 'PERNAMBUCO' => 'PE',
6706| 'PI' => 'PI', 'PIAUI' => 'PI', 'PIAUÍ' => 'PI',
6707| 'RJ' => 'RJ', 'RIO DE JANEIRO' => 'RJ',
6708| 'RN' => 'RN', 'RIO GRANDE DO NORTE' => 'RN',
6709| 'RS' => 'RS', 'RIO GRANDE DO SUL' => 'RS',
6710| 'RO' => 'RO', 'RONDONIA' => 'RO', 'RONDÔNIA' => 'RO',
6711| 'RR' => 'RR', 'RORAIMA' => 'RR',
6712| 'SC' => 'SC', 'SANTA CATARINA' => 'SC',
6713| 'SP' => 'SP', 'SAO PAULO' => 'SP', 'SÃO PAULO' => 'SP',
6714| 'SE' => 'SE', 'SERGIPE' => 'SE',
6715| 'TO' => 'TO', 'TOCANTINS' => 'TO'
6716| ];
6717|
6718| return $estados[$stateUpper] ?? '';
6719| }
6720|
6721| // Occupational Health - Exam Requests list screen (Clinics & Companies)
6722| public function examRequests(Request $request): Response
6723| {
6724| $limit = (int) ($request->query->get('limit') ?? 50);
6725| if ($limit <= 0 || $limit > 200) {
6726| $limit = 50;
6727| }
6728|
6729| $repo = $this->getDoctrine()->getRepository(\App\Entity\SstExamRequest::class);
6730|
6731| $examRequests = $repo->findBy([], ['requestedAt' => 'DESC'], $limit);
6732|
6733| return $this->render('company/occupational_health/exam_requests.html.twig', [
6734| 'examRequests' => $examRequests,
6735| ]);
6736| }
6737|
6738| private function getGenderData($companyMembers): array
6739| {
6740| $genderCounts = ['masculino' => 0, 'feminino' => 0, 'naoInformado' => 0];
6741|
6742| foreach ($companyMembers as $member) {
6743| if (!$member->getUser()) {
6744| continue;
6745| }
6746| $sexo = null;
6747| $esocialTrabalhadorData = $this->entityManager->getRepository(EsocialDadosTrabalhador::class)->findOneBy(['companyMember' => $member]);
6748|
6749| if (!$esocialTrabalhadorData || !$esocialTrabalhadorData->getDadosTrabalhador()) {
6750| $profile = $this->entityManager->getRepository(Profile::class)->findOneBy(['user' => $member->getUser()]);
6751| if ($profile) {
6752| $sexo = $profile->getGenero(); // Já vem no formato legível
6753| }
6754| } else {
6755| $dadosTrabalhador = $esocialTrabalhadorData->getDadosTrabalhador();
6756| $sexo = $this->getCodigoSexo($dadosTrabalhador->getSexo());
6757| }
6758|
6759| if ($sexo) {
6760| if (stripos($sexo, 'masculino') !== false) {
6761| $genderCounts['masculino']++;
6762| } elseif (stripos($sexo, 'feminino') !== false) {
6763| $genderCounts['feminino']++;
6764| } else {
6765| $genderCounts['naoInformado']++;
6766| }
6767| } else {
6768| $genderCounts['naoInformado']++;
6769| }
6770| }
6771|
6772| return $genderCounts;
6773| }
6774|
6775| /**
6776| * Obtém o status consolidado dos eventos do eSocial para um membro específico
6777| *
6778| * @param int $companyMemberId ID do membro da empresa
6779| * @return array Array com status e informações dos eventos
6780| */
6781| public function getEsocialMemberStatus(int $companyMemberId): array
6782| {
6783| $em = $this->entityManager;
6784|
6785| // Busca o trabalhador no eSocial
6786| $esocialTrabalhador = $em->getRepository(EsocialDadosTrabalhador::class)
6787| ->findOneBy(['companyMember' => $companyMemberId]);
6788|
6789| if (!$esocialTrabalhador) {
6790| return [
6791| 'hasData' => false,
6792| 'status' => 'Não Cadastrado',
6793| 'statusClass' => 'status-not-registered',
6794| 'events' => [],
6795| 'totalEvents' => 0
6796| ];
6797| }
6798|
6799| $company = $esocialTrabalhador->getCompanyMember()->getCompany();
6800|
6801| // Busca TODOS os eventos do trabalhador de uma vez só
6802| $allEvents = $em->getRepository(EsocialEvents::class)->findBy([
6803| 'company' => $company
6804| ]);
6805|
6806| $events = [];
6807| $countProcessado = 0;
6808| $countPendente = 0;
6809| $countErro = 0;
6810|
6811| // Mapeia os tipos de eventos para nomes legíveis
6812| $eventTypeNames = [
6813| 'EsocialS2190EvtAdmPrelim' => 'Admissão Preliminar',
6814| 'EsocialS2200EvtAdmissao' => 'Admissão',
6815| 'EsocialS1200EvtRemun' => 'Remuneração',
6816| 'EsocialS2230EvtAfastTemp' => 'Afastamento Temporário',
6817| 'EsocialS2298EvtReintegr' => 'Reintegração',
6818| 'EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento' => 'Desligamento',
6819| 'EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino' => 'Término TSV'
6820| ];
6821|
6822| foreach ($allEvents as $event) {
6823| $isRelated = false;
6824|
6825| // Verifica se o evento está relacionado ao trabalhador
6826| if (method_exists($event, 'getEsocialTrabalhador') && $event->getEsocialTrabalhador()) {
6827| $isRelated = $event->getEsocialTrabalhador()->getId() === $esocialTrabalhador->getId();
6828| } elseif (method_exists($event, 'getDadosRemuneracao') && $event->getDadosRemuneracao()) {
6829| $remuneracao = $event->getDadosRemuneracao();
Note: Results truncated to 500 lines. Please narrow your line range.
Request #25
deepseek-v4-flash
P:110.28K C:2.06K CR:103.3K CW:0
17323ms
Reasoning
Enough context on the existing S-2299 flows: There's an events list per company; the UI can have multiple S-2299 events for a worker. The member page shows 'prevEvts' etc.
Now let me examine whether there is a precedent pattern where events are edited in place. Look at CompanyMemberController::saveEventS2299: always creates new events, meaning each time a user saves an S-2299 form, it creates a NEW S-2299 event record. Wait, but if a pending draft exists, saving the form again creates another pending draft. That would conflict with "não duplicar evento pendente". Hmm but this is the legacy UI; the UI may only show form when no event. Whatever.
Given evidence: A worker can have multiple S-2299 events. Since `saveEventS2299` always creates a new record, multiple events per trabalhador certainly can exist, and typically at most one is pending at a time.
The automation logic: find latest by id. For typical fresh flow (no prior S-2299), latest = null → create. After first run, if re-run while pending → update (idempotent). After transmit (status changed non-pendente) → existing_not_editable. For readmissão (rehire & second offboarding), the automation would never create a draft because latest is the transmitted S-2299 of the first term → metadata-only. This is the C1 scenario, confirmed by the code and entity cardinality.
Now, an additional concrete functional issue: In `existing_not_editable` case, the automation STILL notifies the responsible with text "O rascunho do S-2299 de X foi criado" even though nothing was created; but this also happens in the `draft_only`/missing data cases where no event is created. And eventStatus/missing are stored only in metadata (visible only by looking at DB/kanban?). The message returned to the caller differentiates but the in-app notification message does not. Not critical.
OK now let me decide final comments and verify precise code snippets from the diff for each.
Comment 1 (C1) — high — snippet around lines 14983-14992 (the findLatest + status check). Provide suggestion: link event search to the current offboarding (filter pendente events by company and possibly by created within current process) and when the latest is non-pendente from a previous desligamento, create a new event rather than skipping.
Comment 2 (C2) — medium/high — the overwrite of pending event with applyEsocialS2299Payload.
Comment 3 (C3) — medium — responsible cross-company validation.
Comment 4 (C4) — medium — intOrNull truncation for vrAlim/percAliment decimal.
Comment 5 (C5) — medium — migration down() cascade delete + orphaned workflows/products. Actually also up() all companies low.
Comment 6 (C6) — low/medium — service god object growth (maintainability).
Comment 7? The double flush/notify atomicity - maybe skip to avoid overreach.
Let me confirm once more the specific scenario for C2: The event that is `pendente` and gets `applyEsocialS2299Payload`... The payload for the update is computed from the automation config plus dismissalDate. If the pending event was created by a *prior run of the automation* with the same offboarding, no harm. If pending event was created manually by HR (which can happen: they might pre-fill the desligamento tab before moving the member to final stage, or from a previous automation config with richer data) then it's overwritten. Because fields not provided by this automation default to '' → set to null. So a pending draft can lose mtvDeslig etc. Yes, plausible. Keep as medium.
Actually I want to double check that applyEsocialS2299Payload default payload would clear dtDeslig? No—dtDeslig = dismissalDate from offboarding. So the automation sets dtDeslig; if HR previously filled different dtDeslig in the pending draft (e.g., actual final date), the automation would overwrite with offboarding's expected date (maybe the same or earlier estimated). If the offboarding dismissal date differs from what HR typed, data loss. mtvDeslig cleared (HR's chosen motivo). So the automation would degrade HR-completed draft. Yes real risk. Keep medium/high, I'll use high severity? It requires an existing pending event created before the automation run, which is plausible in flows where the responsible pre-fills the eSocial tab before finalization... Actually wait, if HR pre-filled the S-2299 tab, event pending exists; automation runs at stage entry to final stage and updates/clobbers it. That's a concrete and likely workflow (pre-fill before finalize). I'll mark high for C2 as well? Hmm.
Wait, more importantly: the whole design is that the automation runs when the member enters the final stage, i.e., BEFORE HR fills the eSocial data. HR fills after receiving notification. So in normal sequencing, automation runs first (creates empty-ish draft with dtDeslig), then HR reviews and fills. Then automation won't run again unless re-triggered. So the clobber scenario arises only when: (a) HR pre-filled before the final stage (unlikely since draft only required near the end), or (b) automation re-triggered after manual fill (re-entering stage). Both possible but not the main path. However, they explicitly claim idempotence. Given the risk still exists in re-trigger path and can silently wipe data, I'd rate medium.
Actually scenario (b) "move the member back and re-enter the final stage" is quite plausible during process corrections: the responsible realizes the employee should not have been advanced, moves them back to Etapa 2 and later again to Etapa 3, triggering the automation again — and if in the meantime the draft was transmitted (pending→transmit status) then latest becomes non-pendente and existing_not_editable (no harm), but if the draft is still pending with HR's manual edits, it is overwritten. So real risk.
Now C4 decimal truncation - verify that config values for vrAlim etc. would come from automation config (not default). Since no config UI exists for this action, but flow builder may allow editing raw config JSON. When a user fills those, truncation occurs. And even if not user-configurable, the payload fields are also stored in metadata and later "pré-preenchido" — but if vrAlim config set as "500.00", int 500 fine; only decimal cents affected. So real but narrow.
Hmm, we could also point out that `percAliment` may arrive as "30.5" (percent), gets int 30. But since fields empty in template, users won't normally fill them; but they may customize automation config in the flow editor if action type exposes config fields? The action has `has_config: false`, meaning no config UI at all in this YAML, so users can't fill these in the builder (except JSON tampering). Wait—how then would motivo/data be provided? They come from the offboarding record (dtDeslig) and the config empty. So the generated draft only contains dtDeslig + none else. That means the promised "S-2299 fica pré-preenchido para revisão" is just date + maybe motivo empty? Hmm.
Actually the responsible gets notified to review in the eSocial tab desligamento where the actual S-2299 form (member_guides) allows filling all fields. So the draft created by automation is basically scaffolding that sets data available from offboarding. In that case, vrAlim etc. only if manually set in config (advanced users). I'll still mention it as medium-low but phrase carefully.
OK, decide on final set. Also I need to respect "reply limit: each file gets its own pass." The automation yaml no issue. Twig fix fine; labels fine.
Let me also review the other template files list_automations and flow_detail: additions are JS maps adding label. No issue.
Migration: another thing to check: `ensureOffboardingStages` inserts flow_stages with `stage_category NULL`. Does flow_stages have NOT NULL on stage_category? In the insert they include stage_category NULL explicitly? Actually insert column list: flow_template_id, product_id, name, description, order_index, advance_rules, stage_category, phase_number, product_slot_index. They pass NULL for stage_category/phase_number/product_slot_index. If stage_category NOT NULL, insert fails. But we can't know schema; the insert mirrors what other seed migrations did? Let's check previous migrations inserting flow_stages to compare columns and NULL usage. Version20260518151423 likely inserted flow_stages with stage_category maybe 'default'. Let's search 'INSERT INTO flow_stages' in migrations.
Vou comparar o INSERT de `flow_stages`/`flow_automations` desta migration com o padrão das migrations de seed anteriores.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["migrations/"], "search_text": "INSERT INTO flow_stages"}
Result
File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php Match lines: 1 736| 'INSERT INTO flow_stages (flow_template_id, product_id, name, description, order_index, advance_rules, stage_category, phase_number) File: migrations/Version20260519173602.php Match lines: 1 196| 'INSERT INTO flow_stages (flow_template_id, product_id, name, description, order_index, advance_rules, stage_category, phase_number) File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php Match lines: 1 364| 'INSERT INTO flow_stages (flow_template_id, product_id, name, description, order_index, advance_rules, stage_category, phase_number, product_slot_index)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["migrations/"], "search_text": "INSERT INTO flow_automations"}
Result
File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php Match lines: 3 758| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index) 766| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index) 781| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index) File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php Match lines: 1 428| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, fixed_stage_type, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index)
Request #26
deepseek-v4-flash
P:112.75K C:219 CR:112.26K CW:0
2410ms
Reasoning
Let me check the previous migrations' `flow_stages` inserts to see the stage_category value (maybe 'etapa' or NULL) and whether they set product_slot_index. Let's read Version20260519173602's ensure default stages (lines ~140-260).
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 260, "file_path": "migrations/Version20260519173602.php", "start_line": 140}
Result
File: migrations/Version20260519173602.php (Total lines: 211)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 140-211
140| $this->connection->executeStatement(
141| 'UPDATE flow_template_products
142| SET order_index = :orderIndex, template_type = \'fixo\'
143| WHERE id = :id',
144| ['orderIndex' => $orderIndex, 'id' => (int) $exists]
145| );
146| return;
147| }
148|
149| $this->connection->executeStatement(
150| 'INSERT INTO flow_template_products (flow_template_id, product_id, order_index, template_type, slot_index)
151| VALUES (:templateId, :productId, :orderIndex, \'fixo\', 0)',
152| ['templateId' => $templateId, 'productId' => $productId, 'orderIndex' => $orderIndex]
153| );
154| }
155|
156| private function ensureCrmDefaultStages(int $templateId, int $crmId): void
157| {
158| $defaultStages = [
159| [
160| 'name' => 'Funil 1',
161| 'description' => 'Contatos recém-capturados que ainda não foram qualificados.',
162| 'orderIndex' => 1,
163| ],
164| [
165| 'name' => 'Funil 2',
166| 'description' => 'Leads qualificados com potencial real de negócio.',
167| 'orderIndex' => 2,
168| ],
169| [
170| 'name' => 'Funil 3',
171| 'description' => 'Oportunidades em negociação ativa ou prestes a fechar.',
172| 'orderIndex' => 3,
173| ],
174| ];
175|
176| foreach ($defaultStages as $stage) {
177| $exists = $this->connection->fetchOne(
178| 'SELECT id
179| FROM flow_stages
180| WHERE flow_template_id = :templateId
181| AND product_id = :productId
182| AND LOWER(name) = LOWER(:name)
183| LIMIT 1',
184| [
185| 'templateId' => $templateId,
186| 'productId' => $crmId,
187| 'name' => $stage['name'],
188| ]
189| );
190|
191| if ($exists) {
192| continue;
193| }
194|
195| $this->connection->executeStatement(
196| 'INSERT INTO flow_stages (flow_template_id, product_id, name, description, order_index, advance_rules, stage_category, phase_number)
197| VALUES (:templateId, :productId, :name, :description, :orderIndex, :advanceRules, NULL, NULL)',
198| [
199| 'templateId' => $templateId,
200| 'productId' => $crmId,
201| 'name' => $stage['name'],
202| 'description' => $stage['description'],
203| 'orderIndex' => (int) $stage['orderIndex'],
204| 'advanceRules' => json_encode([], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
205| ]
206| );
207| }
208| }
209|}
210|
211|
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 820, "file_path": "migrations/Version20260518151423.php", "start_line": 700}
Result
File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php (Total lines: 1558)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 700-820
700| string $anchorDate
701| ): void {
702| $cycles = count($phaseDays);
703| $stages = [];
704| $orderIndex = 0;
705|
706| for ($phase = 1; $phase <= $cycles; $phase++) {
707| $phaseIdx = $phase - 1;
708| $days = (int) ($phaseDays[$phaseIdx] ?? 30);
709| $startOn = $phaseStartDates[$phaseIdx] ?? $anchorDate;
710| $advanceOn = $phaseAdvanceOnDates[$phaseIdx] ?? $anchorDate;
711|
712| $stages[] = [
713| 'name' => "Fase {$phase} em Andamento",
714| 'desc' => "Produtos iniciam em {$startOn} e avançam após {$days} dias. Fim do bloco: {$advanceOn}.",
715| 'cat' => 'andamento', 'phase' => $phase, 'order' => $orderIndex++,
716| 'adv' => ['auto_advance' => true, 'conditions' => [
717| ['type' => 'time_elapsed', 'days' => $days, 'enabled' => true, 'default' => true],
718| ['type' => 'products_completion', 'percentage' => 100, 'enabled' => false, 'default' => false],
719| ]],
720| ];
721| $stages[] = [
722| 'name' => "Análise Periódica Fase {$phase}",
723| 'desc' => "Análise estruturada da Fase {$phase}.",
724| 'cat' => 'feedback_1on1', 'phase' => $phase, 'order' => $orderIndex++, 'adv' => [],
725| ];
726| }
727| $stages[] = [
728| 'name' => 'Análise Jornada',
729| 'desc' => 'Etapa final da jornada para consolidação dos resultados.',
730| 'cat' => 'analise_jornada', 'phase' => null, 'order' => $orderIndex, 'adv' => [],
731| ];
732|
733| $stageIds = [];
734| foreach ($stages as $s) {
735| $this->connection->executeStatement(
736| 'INSERT INTO flow_stages (flow_template_id, product_id, name, description, order_index, advance_rules, stage_category, phase_number)
737| VALUES (:t, NULL, :name, :desc, :o, :adv, :cat, :phase)',
738| ['t' => $templateId, 'name' => $s['name'], 'desc' => $s['desc'], 'o' => $s['order'],
739| 'adv' => json_encode($s['adv'], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE), 'cat' => $s['cat'], 'phase' => $s['phase']]
740| );
741| $stageIds[$s['cat']][(string) ($s['phase'] ?? 'final')] = (int) $this->connection->lastInsertId();
742| }
743|
744| $products = array_values($workflowProductSlugs);
745| foreach ($stages as $s) {
746| $sid = $stageIds[$s['cat']][(string) ($s['phase'] ?? 'final')] ?? null;
747| if (!$sid) {
748| continue;
749| }
750|
751| if ($s['cat'] === 'andamento') {
752| $phaseIdx = max(0, (int) $s['phase'] - 1);
753| $scheduledDate = $phaseStartDates[$phaseIdx] ?? $anchorDate;
754| $daysInStage = (int) ($phaseDays[$phaseIdx] ?? 30);
755| $prods = $this->resolveProductsForPhase($journeyCode, (int) $s['phase'], $products);
756|
757| $this->connection->executeStatement(
758| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index)
759| VALUES (:sid, NULL, :name, \'on_scheduled_date\', \'start_stage_products\', :acfg, :cond, :acts, 1, 0)',
760| ['sid' => $sid, 'name' => 'Na data de início da fase no calendário — iniciar produtos da etapa',
761| 'acfg' => json_encode(['products' => $prods], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
762| 'cond' => json_encode([$this->buildScheduledCondition($scheduledDate)], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
763| 'acts' => json_encode([['type' => 'start_stage_products', 'config' => ['products' => $prods], 'orderIndex' => 0]], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE)]
764| );
765| $this->connection->executeStatement(
766| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index)
767| VALUES (:sid, NULL, :name, \'on_days_in_stage\', \'move_to_next_stage\', \'[]\', :cond, :acts, 1, 1)',
768| ['sid' => $sid, 'name' => 'Após tempo na etapa — mover para próxima etapa',
769| 'cond' => json_encode([['type' => 'on_days_in_stage', 'config' => ['days' => $daysInStage, 'value' => $daysInStage, 'count_from_first_entry' => true], 'orderIndex' => 0]], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
770| 'acts' => json_encode([['type' => 'move_to_next_stage', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0]], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE)]
771| );
772| }
773|
774| if ($s['cat'] === 'feedback_1on1') {
775| $cfg = ['to' => 'direct_manager', 'recipient_type' => 'direct_manager', 'request_type' => 'cycle_feedback_decision',
776| 'title' => 'Decisão da Jornada Metahuman após a análise periódica',
777| 'message' => 'A unidade {{member_name}} concluiu uma etapa de análise periódica da Jornada Metahuman. Escolha o encaminhamento.',
778| 'approve_button_text' => 'Voltar para a fase atual', 'reject_button_text' => 'Avançar para a próxima fase',
779| 'template' => 'bpm-request_notification'];
780| $this->connection->executeStatement(
781| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index)
782| VALUES (:sid, NULL, :name, \'on_enter\', \'request_notification\', :acfg, :cond, :acts, 1, 0)',
783| ['sid' => $sid, 'name' => 'Solicitar decisão do gestor direto após a análise periódica',
784| 'acfg' => json_encode($cfg, JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
785| 'cond' => json_encode([['type' => 'on_enter', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0]], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
786| 'acts' => json_encode([['type' => 'request_notification', 'config' => $cfg, 'orderIndex' => 0]], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE)]
787| );
788| }
789| }
790| }
791|
792| // -------------------------------------------------------------------------
793| // 9. FLOW INSTANCES (plan seed — 1 per template per company)
794| // -------------------------------------------------------------------------
795|
796| private function seedFlowInstances(): void
797| {
798| // Instances are now seeded inline inside seedJornadaMetahumanTemplates().
799| // This method is kept for backward-compat / standalone call on existing DBs.
800| $codes = ['J1', 'J2', 'J3', 'J4', 'J5', 'J6', 'J7', 'J8', 'J9', 'J10'];
801| $companyIds = $this->connection->fetchFirstColumn('SELECT id FROM company');
802|
803| foreach ($companyIds as $companyId) {
804| $companyId = (int) $companyId;
805| foreach ($codes as $code) {
806| $templateId = (int) ($this->connection->fetchOne(
807| 'SELECT ft.id FROM flow_templates ft
808| JOIN workflows w ON w.id = ft.workflow_id
809| WHERE w.company_id = :c AND w.slug = \'jornada-metahuman\'
810| AND JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(ft.settings, \'$.seed_migration\')) = :seed
811| AND JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(ft.settings, \'$.journey_code\')) = :code
812| LIMIT 1',
813| ['c' => $companyId, 'seed' => self::JOURNEY_SEED_KEY, 'code' => $code]
814| ) ?: 0);
815|
816| if ($templateId) {
817| $this->seedOneFlowInstance($templateId, $companyId, $code);
818| }
819| }
820| }
Request #27
deepseek-v4-flash
P:116.08K C:186 CR:112.9K CW:0
2512ms
Reasoning
OK. Migration's SQL follows same patterns. Good — so concerns about the insert columns aren't relevant.
Now note: the new migration inserts flow_stages with `product_slot_index` column - extra column; other migrations do not include product_slot_index; new one includes it and sets NULL. It exists as a column in the schema? They include it in the column list; if column doesn't exist in the prod DB, INSERT fails. Since the flow_stages table might already have that column (added by some migration). Search migrations for product_slot_index.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["migrations/"], "search_text": "product_slot_index"}
Result
File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php
Match lines: 1
132| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_stages ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS product_slot_index INT DEFAULT NULL');
File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
Match lines: 2
349| AND product_slot_index IS NULL
364| 'INSERT INTO flow_stages (flow_template_id, product_id, name, description, order_index, advance_rules, stage_category, phase_number, product_slot_index)
Request #28
deepseek-v4-flash
P:116.4K C:4.76K CR:116.22K CW:0
34683ms
Reasoning
product_slot_index exists since Version20260518151423 migration; fine.
Now the migration flow_stages insert includes product_id = offboarding product id, but product_slot_index NULL. Other migrations (Version20260518151423) inserted with product_id NULL for the journey template. Here product_id provided. In flow_stages schema, there's probably a unique constraint like (flow_template_id, product_id, product_slot_index)? Not necessarily. OK.
Another potential issue: this migration ensures workflow_products linking offboarding product with order_index 0, and ensureWorkflowProduct always sets order_index=0 (UPDATE resets to 0 even if existing had another order). And if multiple templates seeded for the same workflow (there may already be default offboarding template in workflow fluxo-de-saida without seed key?), this just adds new template. Fine.
Potential concern: ensureTemplate's lookup is by seed key only, not name; if a previous custom template created by a user has same name, it'd not be deduped. Fine.
Let's now decide the final comment list. I want to keep to real, impactful issues. Also I should give each review file its own pass but there's no need to comment on every file if nothing wrong.
Final comments:
**AutomationExecutionService**
1. HIGH - C1: S-2299 lookup not bound to current offboarding; after readmissão (transmitted event exists), the action never creates a draft for the new dismissal; metadata only + notification claims draft created. Suggestion: localize pending events by company & term (dtDeslig) or by the offboarding context and create new event when the latest is from an earlier termination.
snippet:
```
$latestEvent = $this->findLatestEsocialS2299Event($esocialTrabalhador);
if ($latestEvent instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $latestEvent->getStatus() !== 'pendente') {
```
severity high.
2. HIGH - C2: pending event from previous/manual context gets reused and overwritten by automation's payload (mostly blank config) clearing filled data. Combine with C1? These two are related but distinct: (1) not finding/nor creating new when latest not pending (readmissão) ; (2) overwriting when latest pending. Actually both are about selection/merge. I'll produce two comments but make them clearly separated. To avoid overkill, maybe one comment covers the whole logic block with both aspects. The tool comments pin one location; I can write a single comment at 14983-15003 describing both the reuse/context issue and the clobber. But user rules prefer focused comments. I'll produce:
- comment 1 (high) at selection lines: no context binding → readmissão no draft + reuses other pending; suggest filtering pending by company/offboarding context and creating a fresh event when the latest corresponds to an earlier desligamento.
- comment 2 (medium) at apply block: rewriting all fields on an already pending event with empty/default values wipes manual data; suggest merge-only-empty fields.
3. MEDIUM - C3: responsible id from config not validated to same company → notification with termination data could go to a person from another company; suggest validating CompanyMembers->getCompany() === flow company before using config id.
4. MEDIUM - C4: decimal fields vrAlim/percAliment via intOrNull truncates decimals (columns decimal(10,2)); confirm units; use decimal preserving precision.
5. LOW (maintainability) - C7: god object growth. Might combine with... I'll include a separate low comment on the added handler? Not necessarily. It's priority #1 per service rules (god object). Put it at the class map line 503 area where the new action mapping line was added? The diff added line 506 map entry 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' =>... Let me anchor at added code `'create_esocial_s2299_draft' => $this->executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft(...)`. Actually that line added in the diff. Good anchor for maintainability comment: 330 lines added to 15k-line class; suggest extracting EsocialS2299DraftService.
**Migration**
6. MEDIUM - C5: down() deletes template; flow_instances FK has ON DELETE CASCADE, so rollback deletes offboarding instances created from the template; plus leaves created workflows/workflow_products/products active. Suggest to not hard-delete or document as irreversible; alternatively soft-disable.
anchor: `'DELETE FROM flow_templates WHERE id = :templateId'` line (the final delete). It's inside down(). Anchor snippet:
```
$this->connection->executeStatement(
'DELETE FROM flow_templates WHERE id = :templateId',
['templateId' => $templateId]
);
```
Also mention workflow/workflow_products not cleaned.
7. LOW - C6: seeding all companies including tenants that don't have offboarding/eSocial and creating workflow/template automatically may be unintended; confirm scope (or filter by companies with offboarding product/esocial mode) - and note product active set globally. Keep low/info.
Would comments 6 and 7 be considered too many? For migration, two comments acceptable (medium + low).
Let me also reconsider comment C4 severity - medium.
Wait, must double-check snippet text must match exactly diff lines. The tool matches existing_code in the diff. For the migration down, snippet must be from the added file lines (all file lines are added). OK.
For comments on service code, the whole file diff contains those added lines, so they are "added" lines; ok.
Now compose messages in pt-BR, following the format: (1) o que mudou/impacto prático em linguagem simples; (2) por que importa; (3) o que fazer. Keep concise, developer-first but not starting with jargon per instructions? The instructions say structure: simple explanation first; but still technical but readable. Keep moderate length.
Let me carefully craft each comment.
Comment 1 (AutomationExecutionService, high):
"Quando o colaborador já tem um S-2299 anterior transmitido (por exemplo, readmissão seguida de novo desligamento), esta ação não cria o rascunho do desligamento atual: ela encontra o evento mais recente do trabalhador e, por ele não estar 'pendente', marca 'existing_not_editable' e apenas grava o payload em metadata — sem evento novo e ainda notificando que o rascunho foi criado. Ao contrário, se existir um rascunho 'pendente' de outro processo (offboarding anterior cancelado ou preenchimento manual), ele é reutilizado como se fosse do offboarding atual. Na prática, a obrigação eSocial pode ficar ausente (novo desligamento sem evento) ou o evento errado é reaproveitado, sem vínculo com a instância do fluxo. Sugiro localizar o evento pendente pelo contexto do offboarding/empresa e, quando o evento mais recente for de um desligamento anterior já transmitido, criar um novo evento com data/motivo do desligamento atual em vez de apenas registrar em metadata."
Anchor: lines:
```
$latestEvent = $this->findLatestEsocialS2299Event($esocialTrabalhador);
if ($latestEvent instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $latestEvent->getStatus() !== 'pendente') {
```
Comment 2 (medium): overwrite:
"Toda vez que a automação roda e encontra um rascunho pendente, ela reescreve todos os campos do evento com o payload do config — e no template padrão quase todos vêm vazios ('' → null). Se o responsável já tiver preenchido/revisado o rascunho (ou ele tiver sido criado manualmente) e o membro voltar à etapa final (reentrada/retry), dados como motivo do desligamento e datas são apagados silenciosamente. Sugiro, para evento pendente já existente, só preencher campos ainda vazios (merge) ou não tocar no evento já criado."
Anchor lines:
```
if ($eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable') {
$event->setDadosRemuneracao($remuneracao);
$this->applyEsocialS2299Payload($event, $payload);
$this->entityManager->persist($event);
}
```
Hmm, that snippet includes the if line plus following lines—exact from diff. Fine.
Comment 3 (medium): responsible cross-company:
"Ao resolver o responsável, o código aceita um id de company_member vindo do config (responsible_id/company_member_id/member_id) sem verificar se ele pertence à mesma empresa do fluxo/colaborador. Se um template/config for copiado entre empresas ou o id estiver desatualizado, a notificação com dados do desligamento (nome do colaborador e link interno) pode ir para uma pessoa de outra empresa. Antes de usar o id do config, confirme que o CompanyMembers pertence à empresa do fluxo; se não pertencer, caia no fallback (responsável do fluxo/offboarding)."
Anchor:
```
if ($configuredId) {
$responsible = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find((int) $configuredId);
if ($responsible instanceof CompanyMembers) {
return $responsible;
}
}
```
Comment 4 (medium): decimal truncation:
"As colunas do evento S-2299 para pensão alimentícia (percAliment/vrAlim) são decimal(10,2), mas a conversão usa intOrNull, que trunca centavos/decimais (ex.: 1234.56 vira 1234). Se o config da automação for preenchido com valor de pensão ou percentual com casas decimais, o rascunho ficará com valor diferente do informado e, se transmitido, gera obrigação incorreta. Confirme a unidade esperada e, se for centavos/percentual, preserve as casas decimais (conversão decimal/string) em vez de (int)."
Anchor:
```
$event->setPercAliment($this->intOrNull($payload['percAliment'] ?? null));
$event->setVrAlim($this->intOrNull($payload['vrAlim'] ?? null));
```
Hmm the anchor must be contiguous lines in diff. Those are two consecutive lines, good.
Wait - actually should double check severity and anchor ordering: lines 15163-15165:
```
$event->setPensAlim($this->intOrNull($payload['pensAlim'] ?? null));
$event->setPercAliment($this->intOrNull($payload['percAliment'] ?? null));
$event->setVrAlim($this->intOrNull($payload['vrAlim'] ?? null));
```
I'll anchor just the two lines percAliment/vrAlim.
Comment 5 (god object, low):
"Este service concentra execução de todas as automações e já passa de 15 mil linhas; a PR adiciona aqui mais ~330 linhas de regra de desligamento eSocial (payload, conversões, resolução de responsável, notificação). Seguindo a priorização de manter responsabilidades fora do service gigante, o ideal é extrair esse bloco para um serviço dedicado (ex.: EsocialS2299DraftService), como já é feito com OffboardingToRecruitment, antes de crescer ainda mais."
Anchor: `'create_esocial_s2299_draft' => $this->executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft($config, $member, $context),` line at ~506.
Actually severity: medium? Since maintainability low. Let's set 'low'? It's a maintainability note; not blocking. Low.
Comment 6 migration (medium):
"O down() remove fisicamente os templates de fluxo. Como flow_instances.flow_template_id tem FK com ON DELETE CASCADE, reverter essa migration depois que empresas criarem offboardings a partir do template apaga as instâncias/processos em andamento. Além disso, o down não remove workflows/workflow_products criados nem reverte products.active=1, deixando dados órfãos. Para seed em produção que vira base de fluxos customizáveis, o rollback deveria apenas desativar/marcar o template como não-seed (ou ser documentado como irreversível após uso)."
Anchor: the delete statement at down().
Comment 7 migration (low):
"O seed percorre todas as empresas e cria workflow 'Fluxos de Saída' + template + 3 etapas mesmo para tenants que não usam offboarding/eSocial, além de forçar products.active=1 globalmente; em base grande isso vira muitas escritas no deploy. Como as migrations anteriores só semearam quando o workflow já existia, vale filtrar por empresas com o produto/module habilitado (ou confirmar com o produto que o template deve ir para todos os tenants)."
Anchor: `$companyIds = $this->connection->fetchFirstColumn('SELECT id FROM company');`
Now, do we also mention transaction/atomicity (medium #4 plan)? I'll skip.
Let me also verify the diff added line for map registration anchor (the switch array entry) to have exact snippet. It's in file at line 506:
```
'create_processo_seletivo' => $this->executeCreateProcessoSeletivo($config, $member, $context),
'create_esocial_s2299_draft' => $this->executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft($config, $member, $context),
```
The added line is the second one. Use that.
Now confirm the exact text for comment 1 and others appears in diff (the diff is the entire new file for migration). For AutomationExecutionService, the method added. Yes.
One more check: I need to be careful not to overstate that flow_instances has FK cascade *when deleting template via SQL*; the FK is in DB schema (from migration Version20260518151423 line 210). Yes, DB-level FK with ON DELETE CASCADE. So deleting template rows in down() cascades deletion of flow_instances referencing them. Confirmed.
Let me double check that down() deletes template after deleting stages etc. If flow_instances reference the template, deletion cascades to instances regardless. So the risk is real.
Let me also confirm workflow creation in up() when no existing 'fluxo-de-saida'. If a company already had a workflow 'fluxo-de-saida' default, ensureWorkflow returns it and attaches the new template. Then down() won't remove workflow; no orphan if existed. For companies where the migration creates a brand-new workflow (because none existed) then template removed, leaving orphan workflow + workflow_product. Confirmed by code.
Alright, let me finalize comments. But I want to also ensure I have a "pass" note for each file to satisfy reply limit: The instructions say before calling task_done, confirm I gave every file its own pass. Since there's no required output per file, I'll mention in summary that I reviewed each file.
Wait: Reply limit in tools instructions: "Before calling task_done, confirm you have given every <file> in <review_files> its own pass." I'll do this and reflect briefly at the end before task_done (not a code comment, just text) — but the code comments are what matter. Let me make sure comment anchors come from the respective files:
- config/automations/offboarding.yaml: no issues.
- migration: 2 comments.
- AutomationExecutionService: 5 comments.
- templates twig: no issues (fix is good). Possibly the motivo fix is fine. list_automations/flow_detail label additions fine.
Let me finalize the code_comment call with all comments, and ensure existing_code snippets exactly match the added lines in diff.
For migration file, snippet in diff:
```
$this->connection->executeStatement(
'DELETE FROM flow_templates WHERE id = :templateId',
['templateId' => $templateId]
);
```
Contains indentation of 12 spaces. In the diff, those lines exist. The tool uses sliding window to find lines; we should reproduce them exactly as in file. Good.
For companyIds:
```
$companyIds = $this->connection->fetchFirstColumn('SELECT id FROM company');
```
8-space indent.
For service comments, verify snippet lines exactly:
Lines from new file:
14983-14986:
```
$latestEvent = $this->findLatestEsocialS2299Event($esocialTrabalhador);
if ($latestEvent instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $latestEvent->getStatus() !== 'pendente') {
```
Include both lines with indentation (20 spaces). We'll anchor on `$latestEvent = $this->findLatestEsocialS2299Event($esocialTrabalhador);` plus following `if...`. But the `if` continues onto next lines; only the first line matters for matching, since the snippet lines must be consecutive and exact. Provide both lines as they appear (first line plus the full if line).
Line 15005-15008:
```
if ($eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable') {
$event->setDadosRemuneracao($remuneracao);
$this->applyEsocialS2299Payload($event, $payload);
$this->entityManager->persist($event);
}
```
Ok.
resolveEsocialS2299Responsible lines 15089-15094:
```
if ($configuredId) {
$responsible = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find((int) $configuredId);
if ($responsible instanceof CompanyMembers) {
return $responsible;
}
}
```
Ok.
Line 15163-15165:
```
$event->setPensAlim($this->intOrNull($payload['pensAlim'] ?? null));
$event->setPercAliment($this->intOrNull($payload['percAliment'] ?? null));
$event->setVrAlim($this->intOrNull($payload['vrAlim'] ?? null));
```
Anchor just two lines: percAliment and vrAlim.
Map line:
```
'create_esocial_s2299_draft' => $this->executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft($config, $member, $context),
```
Anchor single line.
Ensure all existing_code match exact diff lines including indentation (they're added lines in diff; indentation included).
For migration 'companyIds' line: In the diff, it's:
```
+ $companyIds = $this->connection->fetchFirstColumn('SELECT id FROM company');
```
exact.
Alright—also check severity choices: comment 2 could be high. Let me use high for comment 1 and medium for 2? Wait data wipe is arguably severe (data loss). I'll keep comment 2 as high? Both reference same block; two "highs" fine. Let me choose: C1 high, C2 high? Hmm to be measured: C2 requires a pre-existing pending event before the run and then a re-run, less certain; I'll use medium.
Actually C2 scenario where pending draft exists from manual creation *before* the flow final stage is actually likely enough. But is manual creation possible before final stage? The responsible could create S-2299 anytime from the member's eSocial tab. Offboarding eSocial data is usually only relevant at term. Hmm. Use medium.
Let me also ensure category values: bug / security / maintainability / etc. C1 bug, C2 bug, C3 security (cross-tenant) or bug? Notifications of sensitive data across tenants = security. Use "security"? It's more of a data-isolation issue: severity medium, category security. Actually cross-tenant sending to a wrong company member is privacy; use security.
C4 bug. C5 maintainability. Migration comments: C6 bug (data loss on rollback) or maintainability; choose bug (data-loss) medium. C7 low, category "other"? choose maintainability or documentation? It's a business-scope question; use "other". Actually call it maintainability? The concern is about scope of seeding to all companies — product decision. Use "other".
Now produce the comment content in pt-BR concise.
I will also double check the snippet for C3 anchor - the exact lines from the file include the `if ($configuredId) {` and closing `}` with 8-space indent (method body). Yes.
Let me confirm the code map line anchor is inside the diff at 506 (added). Use one-line anchor. But for uniqueness, use the whole added line; enough.
Let me also make sure the code for C1 anchor (2 lines) is unique in diff: `$latestEvent = $this->findLatestEsocialS2299Event($esocialTrabalhador);` unique.
Ready to call code_comment with the list.
Vou verificar um último ponto: se a notificação em `executeNotify` realmente envia e-mail sempre que há `message_html` (o handler passa `message_html`), o que pode gerar e-mail + chat para o responsável em toda execução — e confirmar o trecho do mapa de ações para ancorar o comentário de manutenção.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 520, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 495}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15468) IS_TRUNCATED: false LINE_RANGE: 495-520 495| 'reject_candidate', 'reject' => $this->executeUpdateStatus(array_merge($config, ['status' => 'rejected']), $member, $context), 496| 'create_task' => $this->executeCreateTask($config, $member, $context), 497| 'schedule_interview' => $this->executeScheduleInterview($config, $member, $context), 498| 'assign_user' => $this->executeAssignUser($config, $member, $context), 499| 'add_tag' => $this->executeAddTag($config, $member, $context), 500| 'webhook' => $this->executeWebhook($config, $member, $context), 501| 'complete_flowable_task' => $this->executeCompleteFlowableTask($config, $member, $context), 502| // ✅ Advance rule action - treated as advance_to_next_stage 503| 'advance_rule' => $this->executeAdvanceToNextStage($config, $member, $context), 504| // ✅ Criar Processo Seletivo a partir de offboarding concluído 505| 'create_processo_seletivo' => $this->executeCreateProcessoSeletivo($config, $member, $context), 506| 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' => $this->executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft($config, $member, $context), 507| 508| // ✅ Visibilidade e Acesso - Offboarding 509| 'delay_offboarding_visibility' => $this->executeDelayOffboardingVisibility($config, $member, $context), 510| 'delay_platform_access_removal' => $this->executeDelayPlatformAccessRemoval($config, $member, $context), 511| 512| // ✅ PDI: Atribuir responsável à meta 513| 'assign_responsible', 'assign_goal_responsible' => $this->executeAssignGoalResponsible($config, $member, $context), 514| 515| // ✅ PDI: Movimentar sem solicitação (mesmo destino que Enviar solicitação, executa direto) 516| 'direct_movement', 517| 'assign_to_other_bpmn_flow_direct' => $this->executeDirectMovement($config, $member, $context), 518| 519| // ✅ Ciclos: iniciar todos os produtos associados à etapa do orquestrador 520| 'start_stage_products' => $this->executeStartStageProducts($config, $member, $context),
Request #29
deepseek-v4-flash
P:121.78K C:1.97K CR:121.09K CW:0
12108ms
Reasoning
Good, the map line is confirmed.
Now let me finalize and emit code comments. I've analyzed:
1. Event lookup/context issue (high).
2. Overwrite pending draft (medium).
3. Cross-company responsible (medium/security).
4. Decimal truncation (medium).
5. God object (low).
6. Migration down() data-loss/orphans (medium).
7. Migration seeds all tenants / activate product global (low).
Write all code_comment calls in one block since independent.
For each, `path` relative; category; severity; existing_code; content.
Let's craft the final message text before tool call? The tool posts comments; we then write summary text and task_done.
Revisão concluída para cada arquivo do grupo. Vou registrar os comentários nos pontos encontrados.
Tool Calls (1)
code_comment
Show Details
Arguments
{"comments": [{"path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "existing_code": " $latestEvent = $this->findLatestEsocialS2299Event($esocialTrabalhador);\n if ($latestEvent instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $latestEvent->getStatus() !== 'pendente') {", "category": "bug", "severity": "high", "content": "A busca do evento S-2299 não está amarrada ao desligamento/offboarding atual, apenas ao trabalhador. Se o colaborador já teve um desligamento anterior transmitido (readmissão seguida de nova saída), o evento mais recente não estará 'pendente' e esta ação nunca criará o rascunho do desligamento novo — fica só em metadata, e mesmo assim o responsável é notificado como se o rascunho tivesse sido criado. Por outro lado, um rascunho 'pendente' de outro processo (offboarding cancelado ou preenchimento manual anterior) é reutilizado como se pertencesse a este offboarding. Resultado prático: obrigação eSocial ausente no novo desligamento ou evento reaproveitado/sobrescrito indevidamente, sem vínculo com a instância. Sugiro buscar o evento pendente pelo contexto (empresa/offboarding/data do desligamento) e, quando o mais recente for de um desligamento anterior já transmitido, criar um novo evento para o desligamento atual em vez de apenas registrar metadata."}, {"path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "existing_code": " if ($eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable') {\n $event->setDadosRemuneracao($remuneracao);\n $this->applyEsocialS2299Payload($event, $payload);\n $this->entityManager->persist($event);\n }", "category": "bug", "severity": "medium", "content": "Sempre que a automação encontra um rascunho 'pendente', ela reescreve todos os campos do evento com o payload do config — e no template padrão quase todos os campos vêm vazios ('' vira null via stringOrNull/dateOrNull/intOrNull). Se o rascunho já tiver sido preenchido/revisado pelo responsável e a automação rodar de novo (membro volta e reentra na etapa final, ou retry), dados como motivo do desligamento e datas são apagados silenciosamente. Para um evento pendente já existente, o correto é fazer merge só dos campos ainda vazios (ou não alterar o evento), preservando o trabalho de revisão."}, {"path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "existing_code": " if ($configuredId) {\n $responsible = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find((int) $configuredId);\n if ($responsible instanceof CompanyMembers) {\n return $responsible;\n }\n }", "category": "security", "severity": "medium", "content": "Quando o config da automação traz um id de pessoa (responsible_id/company_member_id/member_id), ele é usado sem validar que essa pessoa pertence à mesma empresa do fluxo/colaborador. Se esse id vier de template copiado entre empresas, merge ou config desatualizado, a notificação com dados do desligamento (nome do colaborador e link interno da ficha) pode ser enviada para alguém de outra empresa. Antes de aceitar o id do config, confirme que o CompanyMembers pertence à empresa do fluxo (mesmo getCompany() do flow instance); se não pertencer, caia no fallback do responsável do fluxo/offboarding."}, {"path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "existing_code": " $event->setPercAliment($this->intOrNull($payload['percAliment'] ?? null));\n $event->setVrAlim($this->intOrNull($payload['vrAlim'] ?? null));", "category": "bug", "severity": "medium", "content": "Campos de pensão alimentícia viram inteiro por truncamento: a coluna no banco é decimal(10,2), mas intOrNull descarta as casas decimais — um valor como \"1234.56\" (vrAlim) ou \"30.5\" (percAliment) vira 1234/30 no rascunho. Se o config da automação trouxer valor com centavos ou percentual com decimal, o evento S-2299 fica com valor divergente do informado e, quando transmitido, gera obrigação incorreta. Confirme a unidade esperada (reais inteiros vs. centavos/percentual com casas) e, se necessário, preserve as casas decimais (conversão decimal/string) em vez de (int)."}, {"path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "existing_code": " 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' => $this->executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft($config, $member, $context),", "category": "maintainability", "severity": "low", "content": "A classe já concentra todas as automações e passa de 15 mil linhas; esta PR adiciona mais ~330 linhas de regra de desligamento eSocial (montagem de payload, conversões de CPF/data/booleanos, resolução de responsável e notificação) dentro dela. Esse padrão de crescimento tende a duplicar lógica e dificultar teste. Antes de crescer mais, vale extrair o bloco para um serviço dedicado (ex.: EsocialS2299DraftService), como já é feito com OffboardingToRecruitment."}, {"path": "migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php", "existing_code": " $this->connection->executeStatement(\n 'DELETE FROM flow_templates WHERE id = :templateId',\n ['templateId' => $templateId]\n );", "category": "bug", "severity": "medium", "content": "O down() apaga fisicamente os templates, mas flow_instances.flow_template_id tem FK com ON DELETE CASCADE — reverter esta migration depois que empresas criarem offboardings a partir do template apaga as instâncias/processos em andamento junto. Além disso, o rollback não remove os workflows/workflow_products criados pelo up() nem reverte o active=1 do produto, deixando dados órfãos. Para um seed que vira base de fluxo customizável em produção, o down deveria apenas desativar/marcar o template como não-seed (ou ser documentado como irreversível após uso), em vez de remover registros possivelmente referenciados."}, {"path": "migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php", "existing_code": " $companyIds = $this->connection->fetchFirstColumn('SELECT id FROM company');", "category": "other", "severity": "low", "content": "O seed percorre todas as empresas e cria workflow 'Fluxos de Saída', template e 3 etapas mesmo para tenants que não usam offboarding/eSocial, além de forçar products.active = 1 globalmente; em base grande isso vira muitas escritas durante o deploy. Migrations anteriores só semearam quando o workflow já existia para a empresa. Vale filtrar por empresas com o produto/módulo habilitado (ou confirmar com o produto que a exposição do template para todos os tenants é intencional)."}]}
Result
(async)
Request #30
deepseek-v4-flash
P:123.76K C:719 CR:123.65K CW:0
5889ms
Reasoning
The comments were posted. Now I'll summarize the review of each file and finish.
Files review pass summary:
- config/automations/offboarding.yaml: no problems found. Keys consistent, format matches siblings, triggers/blocked triggers consistent, no yaml-key spelling issues (contents values not checked).
- migration: found 2 issues (down cascade/orphans, all-tenants seed).
- AutomationExecutionService: found 5 issues (event lookup context, overwrite pending, cross-company responsible, decimal truncation, god object).
- motivo_desligamento template fix is correct and consistent with sibling conditions; no issue.
- list_automations label, flow_detail label additions are correct/no issue.
Also there were changes to other areas of AutomationExecutionService in the diff (system_sender) - reviewed and OK.
Call task_done.
Revisei os arquivos do grupo, um a um:
- **config/automations/offboarding.yaml** — sem problemas. A nova ação segue o formato dos itens vizinhos (`allowed_triggers`/`blocked_triggers`/`blocked_trigger_message`/`config_preset`), com as mesmas chaves usadas em outras ações do arquivo.
- **migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php** — 2 pontos: `down()` remove templates fisicamente (com FK `flow_instances ... ON DELETE CASCADE`, reverter apaga processos criados; e deixa workflows/workflow_products órfãos e `products.active=1` sem reversão); seed incondicional para todos os tenants (migrations anteriores só semeavam quando o workflow já existia).
- **src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php** — 5 pontos: (1) busca do evento S-2299 sem vínculo com o offboarding atual (readmissão não gera rascunho novo; rascunho pendente de outro contexto é reutilizado); (2) reescrita total de evento pendente com payload vazio a cada execução (apaga revisão manual); (3) id de responsável vindo do config sem validação de empresa (vazamento entre tenants); (4) `intOrNull` trunca decimais de `vrAlim`/`percAliment` (colunas `decimal(10,2)`); (5) crescimento do god object (~330 linhas novas em classe de 15k+ linhas) — recomendo extrair serviço dedicado. O ajuste de `system_sender` (remetente Adriana) e o repasse até `sendChatNotification` estão corretos.
- **templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig** — correção coerente com as demais condições do arquivo (todas usam `prevEvts.termino`); sem erro.
- **templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig** e **flow_detail.html.twig** — apenas rótulos adicionados aos mapas; sem problema.
Sem mais achados.
Tool Calls (1)
task_done
Show Details
Arguments
{"state": "DONE"}
Request #31
deepseek-v4-flash
P:23.58K C:5.31K CR:16.64K CW:0
36113ms
Reasoning
Let me analyze the review files. There are 6 files in the review group:
1. config/automations/offboarding.yaml
2. migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
3. src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
4. templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig
5. templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig
6. templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig
There are already confirmed findings. I need to continue reviewing all files and report any other real issues I find, without repeating confirmed findings.
Let me review each file.
### 1. config/automations/offboarding.yaml
The change adds a new automation definition. Looking at the YAML for spelling errors in yaml-keys. The structure:
```yaml
- id: "create_esocial_s2299_draft"
type: "create_esocial_s2299_draft"
title: "Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299)"
icon: "fa-solid fa-file-lines"
has_config: false
allowed_triggers:
- "employee_enters_stage"
blocked_triggers:
- ...
blocked_trigger_message: "..."
description: "..."
config_preset:
to: "flow_responsible"
```
Check other automation entries to compare style/keys. Let me check the config file for similar entries to confirm keys match (like `config_preset` with `to`, and whether other automations with `has_config: false` use config_preset). Actually need to read context. Let me compare to a similar automation in this YAML file that has `has_config: false` and config_preset. Let me read the file.
The keys seem consistent. Spelling of yaml keys - all lowercase snake. Fine. Value content ignored.
One possible concern: `config_preset` with `to: "flow_responsible"` but `has_config: false`. That seems odd - config_preset is being set but there's no config. Actually maybe for other automations config_preset is used for auto-configuration. Let me look at other entries in the file to see if config_preset key exists elsewhere.
### 2. Migration
Already confirmed findings 1 and 2. Need to look for other issues.
Looking at migration code:
- `up()` iterates over companies, ensures workflow. `ensureWorkflow` sets `is_default = 1`. Wait — this is important. When it creates a workflow for a company that doesn't yet have one, it creates with is_default = 1. But what if the company already has another default workflow? Hmm, but this is creating the "Fluxos de Saída" workflow; if the company already has one with slug 'fluxo-de-saida', returns existing. But does the query check `company_id`? Yes, it checks company_id AND slug. OK.
- But `ensureWorkflow` — if workflow already exists, returns existing. There might be an issue if another workflow with slug 'fluxo-de-saida' is registered by the company for a different purpose? Not likely.
- In `ensureOffboardingStages`, each stage inserts a stage, then ensureActivity adds one activity named 'Offboarding' to every stage. That seems weird but maybe fine for templates.
- `ensureAutomation` inserts with `flow_template_id` NULL but stage has flow_template_id. Hmm, the INSERT includes `flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, fixed_stage_type, ...` with flow_template_id = NULL. Is that right? Some migrations may set flow_template_id. But if existing structures rely on flow_template_id being set for automations, having NULL could be a problem. Need to look at schema/other seed migrations. Let me search for other migrations that seed flow_automations.
- Table existence check: In up(), it returns early if any of the listed tables don't exist. Wait — it returns (not throws) if a table doesn't exist, meaning it silently skips. For a migration this could leave partial data but that's typically OK-ish for idempotency.
- Actually important: in up(), it loops over company table. However, `flow_templates` requires columns `settings`, `template_category`. This migration is written for a specific schema.
- down(): Deletes automations, activities, stages, template_products, template. But note: `flow_template_products` deletion only deletes rows whose flow_template_id matches. But the DELETE for flow_automations and flow_activities rely on flow_stages join.
Wait, in `up()`, `ensureOffboardingStages` can attach to existing stages (found by name) from a previous run or other seeds. If the same stage name existed before this migration with its own activities/automations, the down() will delete ALL activities and automations of that stage (since it deletes by flow_stage_id from the template) — that could delete pre-existing content of stages created by other means. But given stages are created by this migration, this is only a risk if idempotent re-run, which doesn't produce duplicates.
Hmm, but there is a real concern: down() deletes all flow_activities of stages belonging to that template, including ones not created by this migration. But since templates are keyed with seed_migration in settings, only templates created by this migration will match... unless the stage names already existed and were attached to another pre-existing template? ensureOffboardingStages is invoked with templateId being the template this migration creates/finds by seed_migration setting. Since the template is identified by seed_migration=SEED_KEY, the down() will only delete data of that template's stages. OK.
- Concurrency/idempotency: If migration up is run, then partially fails... Not worrying.
Now let's look at potential issue: `ensureStage` looks up by `name` with LOWER() and product_id. But MySQL LOWER() on a column with case-insensitive collation is fine.
- The migration uses raw SQL with `JSON_EXTRACT`. If MySQL version... They use JSON functions. Presumably fine.
- In `ensureAutomation`, `actions` array uses nested structure: `actions` => [['type' => 'send_email', 'config' => ..., 'orderIndex' => 0]]. Let me look at how flow_automations actions/conditions structures are stored elsewhere (other migrations or entity). This matters for correctness of the seeded template. Let me search existing migrations or data for seed migrations for flow_automations.
Let me search code for 'flow_automations' INSERT patterns in other migrations to compare structure of 'conditions', 'actions', 'action_config', 'trigger_type', 'action_type' values ('on_enter', 'on_all_activities_complete', 'on_offboarding_complete', 'send_email_flow_responsible', 'stage_change', 'create_processo_seletivo', 'create_esocial_s2299_draft').
Note: In offboarding.yaml, the automation `create_esocial_s2299_draft` has `allowed_triggers: [employee_enters_stage]` and `blocked_triggers`. In YAML, allowed_triggers uses name 'employee_enters_stage'. In the migration, triggerType 'on_enter'. Are these consistent? Need to check what trigger types look like in this domain: maybe 'employee_enters_stage' maps to automation trigger type 'on_enter'. Let me look at other automations in YAML file and migration.
Also check the automated code in `AutomationExecutionService::executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, where notifications call `executeNotify` with `to => 'company_member'`? Wait, actual: `$this->executeNotify([... 'to' => 'company_member', 'company_member_id' => (string) $responsible->getId(), ...], $member, ...)`. Hmm, need to check the signature of executeNotify: first arg $config, second $member (recipient), third $context? Let me check existing calls.
Actually, in diff at line ~7028, there is a modification where `$emailConfig['system_sender'] = $config['system_sender'] ?? null;` inside a function handling... need context to know which method this is. Let me read the file around those lines.
Let me carefully examine the service diff:
- New action registered: `'create_esocial_s2299_draft' => $this->executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft($config, $member, $context),`
- Change in the section near line 7039: `'system_sender' => $config['system_sender'] ?? null,` added to an emailConfig array. Context: need to see the enclosing method to confirm `$config` exists and is the same as outer method param. Let me read.
- Change near line 13903: replace `$isPayrollSystemSender` with `$isSystemSender = filter_var($config['system_sender'] ?? false, FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN) || (...)`. Need to confirm `$config` in that scope includes 'system_sender' key and is being passed through. The executeNotify receives config with 'system_sender' => true in new method. Need to check that config propagates to this code path. Let me read the method around 13900 to see where config comes from.
Potential issues to spot:
- The new automation code calls `executeNotify` — but does `executeNotify` exist as a method in this class with this signature? Search.
- `member_id` context merge: they merge `'member_id' => (string) $companyMember->getId()` into context. But `executeNotify` recipient is the flow member `$member`; notification is being addressed to responsible with `to => 'company_member'` and `company_member_id` = responsible id. Also message includes `{{member_name}}`. The notify templates may be resolved by context member. Hmm.
But careful: The primary review already covers many service issues. Let me focus on things not in confirmed findings.
Possible additional issues:
1. In the new method, after the first flush they update metadata eventId with a second flush. This is weird but fine. Not a real bug.
2. If eventStatus is 'existing_not_editable' or data missing, they still notify. OK.
3. Duplicate concern: If `$eventStatus === 'existing_not_editable'`, they skip applying payload but still `$event` refers to latest event; metadata records eventId. OK.
4. The logic `if (!$esocialTrabalhador ...) missing[] ... else { ... if (!$remuneracao ...) ... }`. Note: they only set dadosRemuneracao if found. If missing, event not created; metadata still recorded with missing field. Fine.
5. Notify uses `system_sender` => true, which triggers the new `$isSystemSender` logic, sending to the Adriana conversation. But wait — in that code path around 13903, is it the "sendChatToSpecificEmails"/chat notification path? The comment says for system sender, uses getOrCreateAssistantConversation($user). But the flow: the notification is sent to the responsible person. If a notification was previously sent as a chat message from a manager, using system_sender means message goes to the Adriana conversation of the responsible user. OK by design.
But is `system_sender` in the config of that chat path? Let's look at code at 13900-13940 in file to understand config context — need to verify whether `$config['system_sender']` there refers to the same $config passed to executeNotify, and whether the boolean filter_var on it is reliable. We'll read.
Also near line 7039, the `system_sender` addition to emailConfig: this affects email sending path; check if `system_sender` should be applied there — but maybe emails should not have sender "Adriana"? Hard to tell. This is in a method that processes notifications/emails — need context.
Let me look at the template fix in motivo_desligamento.html.twig:
```twig
value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab %}{{ prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab }}{% endif %}">
```
The original bug was referencing `prevEvts.desligamento` condition but `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` value. Now fixed to check `prevEvts.termino`. Good fix. But wait, is `prevEvts.termino` accessible after the change? yes. Fine. This is correct fix.
list_automations.html.twig: adds label mapping. Fine.
flow_detail.html.twig: adds label mapping. Fine.
Now migration deeper checks:
- In the yaml config, the automation description says it creates draft etc. allowed_triggers: employee_enters_stage. Good.
Potential mismatch: In migration, automations seeded use action_type 'send_email_flow_responsible' for stage 1 with actionConfig to flow_responsible and template offboarding_stage_enter. Hmm. Action type naming: In YAML there's presumably automation entries with `type` names like `send_email_flow_responsible`, `stage_change`, `create_processo_seletivo`. Let me compare against config/automations/offboarding.yaml entries to see the canonical action types and trigger names, and whether `send_email_flow_responsible` is a valid type in the system (maybe action type is 'notify_flow_responsible' or 'send_email'). Also whether the seeded conditions/actions structures are consistent with other seeded templates. There may already be existing migrations seeding flow_automations. Let me search the codebase.
Actually, the config YAML entry that was added corresponds to a new action "create_esocial_s2299_draft" with `type: create_esocial_s2299_draft`. The YAML config type appears to be the action type used to render labels and allowed triggers.
But in the migration, the seeded actionType values are: 'send_email_flow_responsible', 'stage_change', 'create_processo_seletivo', 'create_esocial_s2299_draft'. And triggerType values: 'on_enter', 'on_all_activities_complete', 'on_offboarding_complete'.
Let me search the codebase for how action types and trigger types are referenced in YAML config vs DB. For instance, in the automation execution service action map, keys: 'send_email' etc. Let's check the actual action dispatch map to confirm 'send_email_flow_responsible', 'stage_change', 'create_processo_seletivo' exist. In the diff we see 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' maps to the new method; 'create_processo_seletivo' maps to executeCreateProcessoSeletivo. So those action types exist in the service. For trigger types, need to check names used in automation conditions.
Let me search for 'on_offboarding_complete' and 'on_all_activities_complete' and 'employee_enters_stage' in code.
Let me also examine the possibility that the migration stage seeds an automation that triggers `create_processo_seletivo` when offboarding completes — that converts offboarding into recruitment? From the summary, that might be questionable as a default flow but it's per requirements? The YAML has a separate automation "create processo seletivo" in offboarding.yaml? Let me check the file.
Anyway, the review is about issues. Let me run searches to understand domain names.
Also potential issue in migration: `ensureProduct` sets active=1 and name only if empty for existing offboarding product. That forcibly activates product "offboarding" for all companies (products table may be global, not per company). products active is global table — forcing active=1 could be unintended. That's similar to confirmed finding #2 partly (products.active global activation). It's already flagged; don't repeat.
Let me look for other problems:
- Migration `down()`: does not delete the `products` row created if the product didn't exist, nor workflow created, nor workflow_product rows. This is part of confirmed finding #1? Finding #1 says "Além disso, o rollback não remove os workflows/workflow_products". That's the same as down() not cleaning workflows — already flagged. So don't repeat.
- Migration: uses `fetchFirstColumn('SELECT id FROM company')` — for tenants with many companies. Confirmed finding #2.
- Migration `ensureWorkflowProduct($workflowId, $offboardingProductId, 0)` sets order_index = 0. Fine.
- Migration seed creates stages where `product_slot_index IS NULL` filter, and inserted with product_slot_index NULL. Fine.
- What about flow_templates having `workflow_id` NOT NULL? In ensureTemplate it inserts with workflow_id and company_id. Good.
- Another possible issue: in `up()`, the SQL `SELECT id FROM flow_templates WHERE workflow_id ... AND JSON_UNQUOTE(JSON_EXTRACT(settings, '$.seed_migration')) = :seed` — if settings is null, JSON_EXTRACT returns null and JSON_UNQUOTE returns null, comparison to seed fine.
- Wait: in down(), it selects templates by settings seed. But if settings stored as a string (not JSON type), JSON_EXTRACT on TEXT column with valid JSON returns ok. Suppose the settings stored without JSON? They always json_encode. OK.
- Idempotency of down when run then up: fine.
- A subtle: down() deletes automations first, then activities, then stages, template_products, template. But flow_instances may reference flow_template_id; FK cascade deletes instances. That's confirmed finding #1. Don't repeat.
Potential additional issue in migration: `ensureOffboardingStages` seeds the "Etapa 3 - Finalização" automation "Criar Processo Seletivo ao concluir offboarding" with trigger on_offboarding_complete. Creating a processo seletivo automatically upon completion of an offboarding seems like a business decision possibly tied to rehiring? Actually creating recruitment process after offboarding automatically seems a weird default and is unrelated to eSocial S-2299 scope (creating recruitment). However, the summary/PR mentions this maybe existed already in the offboarding config yaml? Let me check if this default behavior is elsewhere in YAML config, maybe those actions are from an existing template. Actually, if this is a "default flow template" for offboarding with eSocial, automatically creating "Processo Seletivo" on completing offboarding appears to be out of scope and a side effect. But need to confirm context: maybe it's actually intended (a standard pattern in the company: when an employee leaves, they create a recruitment process to backfill). Could be business-valid but not in PR description. Might be flagged as scope/extra? Since the seeded flow is the centerpiece of the PR, adding create_processo_seletivo default is arguably a scope question. But we need evidence. Let me check the config yaml file around this.
Let me read offboarding.yaml fully (or the relevant parts) to see existing automation list.
Let me look at lines before/after 179 in config/automations/offboarding.yaml.
Also let me examine what other automation definitions exist that share keys with the new entry: e.g., other `type: create_processo_seletivo` entries with allowed_triggers etc.
Let me read the file.
Also, the `AutomationExecutionService` new code uses `$this->router`? Search for `router` property in class. It checks `$this->router ? ...`. Let's confirm the class has `private $router` property and is non-null. Search.
Also uses `$this->entityManager`, `$this->log`, `$this->executeNotify`? Wait it calls `$this->executeNotify([...], $member, array_merge(...))`. Need to find executeNotify method signature and confirm third param is $context. Let me search for `function executeNotify`.
Also uses `EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class` with `findByTrabalhador`. Need to confirm method exists on repository. Also `EsocialDadosTrabalhador`, `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` entity getters/setters used: setModo, setTpAmb, setTpInscTransmissor, setNrInscTransmissor, setEsocialTrabalhador, setIndRetif, setStatus, setCreatedAt, setUpdatedAt, setDadosRemuneracao, setMtvDeslig, setDtDeslig, setDtAvPrv, setIndPagtoApi, setDtProjFimApi, setPensAlim, setPercAliment, setVrAlim, setNrProcTrab, setIndPdv, setCpfSubstituto, setDtNascto, setNovoCpf, setIndRemun, setDtFimRemun, setInsConsig, setNrContr. Also `Company::getCnpj`, `getEsocialMode`. Need to verify these setter names on entity. If any mismatch, runtime error. Let's search entity EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.
Let me also check `OffboardingMember` getters: getDismissalDate, getRequestedAt, getReason, getCompanyMember, getOffboarding, getOffboardingFlowResponsible etc. Search entity OffboardingMember and Offboarding.
Let me search for these entities to verify.
Potential issue: `getDismissalDate()` could return DateTime; fallback requestedAt.
Another important issue: In `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, if `$company->getEsocialMode() === null`, they return `executed:false, skipped:true`. But what if company->esocialMode is null but they still want to record the draft in metadata for audit? The PR says draft is saved in metadata for audit. When esocial disabled, they skip entirely without recording. That might be a design decision. Not a bug.
Another potential issue: `$event->setTpAmb($company->getEsocialMode() ?? '2');` when creating event; if esocialMode null, we never get here because of early return. Fine.
Check for `executeNotify` third param context merge with member_id — this is how templates resolve member_name? Let's verify.
Wait, actually one potential real bug: The notification config passes `'to' => 'company_member', 'company_member_id' => (string)$responsible->getId()`. But in the diff of the chat/sender code around 13903, that logic determines whether the recipient (the person being messaged) is a manager... Let me read to ensure this to/company_member combination resolves correctly for a notification to the responsible rather than a message from them.
Let me read the region of the code near 7039 and 13903.
Let me start reading and searching.
Let me plan the tool calls:
1. file_read config/automations/offboarding.yaml (whole file maybe 300 lines?) around line 100-250.
2. file_read src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php around 7000-7100 and 13850-14050, and 14920-15300.
3. code_search for "function executeNotify", "system_sender", "function getOrCreateAssistantConversation", "isPayrollSystemSender".
4. Search entity EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento for setters.
5. Search entity OffboardingMember for getters.
6. Search for other migration seeding flow_automations to compare structures.
Let me do these.
I'll begin with a batch of parallel tool calls for file reads and searches.
Tool Calls (3)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "config/automations/offboarding.yaml", "start_line": 1, "end_line": 260}
Result
File: config/automations/offboarding.yaml (Total lines: 481)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-260
1|# Configuração de Automações - Offboarding
2|# Este arquivo define triggers, actions e regras específicos para desligamento de colaboradores
3|
4|product:
5| id: 3
6| name: "Offboarding"
7| slug: "offboarding"
8| entity_name: "Colaborador"
9| entity_name_plural: "Colaboradores"
10|
11|# Triggers (Condições) disponíveis
12|triggers:
13| notifications:
14| - id: "deadline_reached"
15| type: "on_timeout"
16| title: "Prazo desta etapa ser atingido"
17| icon: "fa-solid fa-clock"
18| has_config: false
19|
20| - id: "exit_date"
21| type: "on_exit_date"
22| title: "Data de desligamento chegar"
23| icon: "fa-solid fa-calendar-xmark"
24| has_config: false
25|
26| - id: "any_activity_completed"
27| type: "on_any_activity_complete"
28| title: "Qualquer atividade da etapa ser concluída"
29| icon: "fa-solid fa-tasks"
30| has_config: false
31|
32| - id: "employee_enters_stage"
33| type: "on_enter"
34| title: "Colaborador entrar nesta etapa"
35| icon: "fa-solid fa-arrow-right-to-bracket"
36| has_config: false
37|
38| movement:
39| - id: "all_activities_completed"
40| type: "on_all_activities_complete"
41| title: "Colaborador finalizar X% das atividades da etapa"
42| icon: "fa-solid fa-check-double"
43| has_config: true
44| config_type: "percentage_activities"
45| config_label: "Porcentagem mínima de atividades concluídas"
46| config_options:
47| # Opções geradas dinamicamente no front com base em stageActivitiesCount (25%, 50%, 75%, 100% para 4 atividades, etc.)
48| dynamic_from_stage: true
49|
50| - id: "all_activities_completed_plus_days"
51| type: "on_all_activities_complete_plus_days"
52| title: "Colaborador finalizar todas as atividades da etapa e passar X dias"
53| icon: "fa-solid fa-calendar-check"
54| has_config: true
55| config_type: "dropdown"
56| config_label: "Número de dias após conclusão"
57| config_options:
58| - { id: "1", label: "1 dia" }
59| - { id: "2", label: "2 dias" }
60| - { id: "3", label: "3 dias" }
61| - { id: "5", label: "5 dias" }
62| - { id: "7", label: "7 dias" }
63| - { id: "14", label: "14 dias" }
64| - { id: "30", label: "30 dias" }
65|
66| - id: "offboarding_completed"
67| type: "on_offboarding_complete"
68| title: "Colaborador concluir o offboarding (última etapa)"
69| icon: "fa-solid fa-flag-checkered"
70| has_config: false
71|
72| - id: "days_after_offboarding_start"
73| type: "on_days_after_start"
74| title: "X dias após o início do offboarding"
75| icon: "fa-solid fa-calendar-days"
76| has_config: true
77| config_type: "dropdown"
78| config_label: "Número de dias após início"
79| config_options:
80| - { id: "1", label: "1 dia" }
81| - { id: "2", label: "2 dias" }
82| - { id: "3", label: "3 dias" }
83| - { id: "5", label: "5 dias" }
84| - { id: "7", label: "7 dias" }
85| - { id: "14", label: "14 dias" }
86| - { id: "30", label: "30 dias" }
87| - { id: "60", label: "60 dias" }
88| - { id: "90", label: "90 dias" }
89|
90| - id: "days_in_stage"
91| type: "on_days_in_stage"
92| title: "Colaborador estiver há X dias na mesma etapa"
93| icon: "fa-solid fa-hourglass-half"
94| has_config: true
95| config_type: "dropdown"
96| config_label: "Número de dias na etapa"
97| config_options:
98| - { id: "1", label: "1 dia" }
99| - { id: "2", label: "2 dias" }
100| - { id: "3", label: "3 dias" }
101| - { id: "5", label: "5 dias" }
102| - { id: "7", label: "7 dias" }
103| - { id: "14", label: "14 dias" }
104| - { id: "30", label: "30 dias" }
105|
106|# Actions (Ações) disponíveis
107|actions:
108| notifications:
109| # ---------------------------------------------------------
110| # NOTIFICAÇÕES INTERNAS (Chat/Sistema)
111| # ---------------------------------------------------------
112|
113| # 1. Notificar colaborador
114| - id: "notify_employee"
115| type: "notification"
116| title: "Notificar colaborador"
117| icon: "fa-solid fa-bell"
118| has_config: false
119| config_preset:
120| to: "employee"
121|
122| # 2. Notificar responsável do fluxo
123| - id: "notify_flow_responsible"
124| type: "notification"
125| title: "Notificar responsável do fluxo"
126| icon: "fa-solid fa-user-check"
127| has_config: false
128| config_preset:
129| to: "flow_responsible"
130|
131| # 2.1 Notificar preenchimento eSocial (somente se empresa tiver eSocial habilitado)
132| - id: "notify_esocial_worker_data"
133| type: "notify_esocial_worker_data"
134| title: "Notificar preenchimento de dados do trabalhador e remuneração (eSocial)"
135| icon: "fa-solid fa-id-card-clip"
136| has_config: false
137| config_preset:
138| to: "flow_responsible"
139|
140| # ---------------------------------------------------------
141| # ENVIO DE E-MAILS (SMTP)
142| # Template determinado automaticamente baseado em: trigger + destinatário
143| # Ex: offboarding-on_all_activities_complete-employee
144| # ---------------------------------------------------------
145|
146| # 3. Enviar e-mail para colaborador
147| - id: "send_email_employee"
148| type: "send_email"
149| title: "Enviar e-mail para colaborador"
150| icon: "fa-solid fa-envelope"
151| has_config: false
152| config_preset:
153| to: "employee"
154|
155| # 4. Enviar e-mail para responsável do fluxo
156| - id: "send_email_flow_responsible"
157| type: "send_email"
158| title: "Enviar e-mail para responsável do fluxo"
159| icon: "fa-solid fa-user-gear"
160| has_config: false
161| config_preset:
162| to: "flow_responsible"
163|
164| # ---------------------------------------------------------
165| # NOTIFICAÇÕES ADICIONAIS
166| # ---------------------------------------------------------
167|
168| - id: "send_whatsapp"
169| type: "send_whatsapp"
170| title: "Enviar WhatsApp para colaborador"
171| icon: "fa-brands fa-whatsapp"
172| has_config: false
173|
174| movement:
175| - id: "move_to_next_stage"
176| type: "stage_change"
177| title: "Mover para a próxima etapa"
178| icon: "fa-solid fa-arrow-right"
179| has_config: false
180| description: "Move o colaborador para a próxima etapa do offboarding."
181|
182| - id: "create_esocial_s2299_draft"
183| type: "create_esocial_s2299_draft"
184| title: "Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299)"
185| icon: "fa-solid fa-file-lines"
186| has_config: false
187| allowed_triggers:
188| - "employee_enters_stage"
189| blocked_triggers:
190| - "offboarding_completed"
191| - "exit_date"
192| - "deadline_reached"
193| - "all_activities_completed"
194| - "all_activities_completed_plus_days"
195| - "any_activity_completed"
196| - "days_in_stage"
197| - "days_after_offboarding_start"
198| blocked_trigger_message: "Esta ação só pode ser usada com o trigger 'Colaborador entrar nesta etapa'"
199| description: "Cria ou atualiza o rascunho do evento S-2299 com dados do offboarding e notifica o responsável para revisar o desligamento eSocial."
200| config_preset:
201| to: "flow_responsible"
202|
203| # ---------------------------------------------------------
204| # AÇÕES DE VISIBILIDADE E ACESSO
205| # ---------------------------------------------------------
206|
207| visibility:
208| # Ação disponível APENAS na primeira etapa (ou Etapa Intermediária em flows variáveis)
209| # Usada com trigger on_enter
210| - id: "delay_offboarding_visibility"
211| type: "delay_offboarding_visibility"
212| title: "Aguardar X dias para exibir offboarding ao colaborador"
213| icon: "fa-solid fa-eye-slash"
214| has_config: true
215| config_type: "dropdown"
216| config_label: "Dias para aguardar antes de exibir o offboarding"
217| allowed_triggers:
218| - "employee_enters_stage"
219| blocked_triggers:
220| - "offboarding_completed"
221| - "exit_date"
222| - "deadline_reached"
223| - "all_activities_completed"
224| - "all_activities_completed_plus_days"
225| - "any_activity_completed"
226| - "days_in_stage"
227| - "days_after_offboarding_start"
228| blocked_trigger_message: "Esta ação só pode ser usada com o trigger 'Colaborador entrar nesta etapa'"
229| first_stage_only: true
230| description: "Define um período de espera antes de exibir o offboarding na tela do colaborador. O offboarding só será visível após X dias."
231| config_options:
232| - { id: "1", label: "1 dia" }
233| - { id: "2", label: "2 dias" }
234| - { id: "3", label: "3 dias" }
235| - { id: "5", label: "5 dias" }
236| - { id: "7", label: "7 dias" }
237| - { id: "10", label: "10 dias" }
238| - { id: "14", label: "14 dias" }
239| - { id: "21", label: "21 dias" }
240| - { id: "30", label: "30 dias" }
241| - { id: "45", label: "45 dias" }
242| - { id: "60", label: "60 dias" }
243| - { id: "90", label: "90 dias" }
244|
245| # Ação disponível APENAS na última etapa (ou Etapa Final em flows variáveis)
246| # Usada com trigger on_offboarding_complete
247| - id: "delay_platform_access_removal"
248| type: "delay_platform_access_removal"
249| title: "Permitir acesso à plataforma por X dias após finalizar"
250| icon: "fa-solid fa-user-clock"
251| has_config: true
252| config_type: "dropdown"
253| config_label: "Dias de acesso à plataforma após conclusão"
254| allowed_triggers:
255| - "offboarding_completed"
256| blocked_triggers:
257| - "employee_enters_stage"
258| - "deadline_reached"
259| - "exit_date"
260| - "any_activity_completed"
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "function executeNotify"}
Result
File: .docs/NOTIFICACOES_MULTIPLOS_CANAIS.md Match lines: 1 378|private function executeNotify(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 2 6896| private function executeNotifyEsocialWorkerData(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array 6930| private function executeNotify(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array File: src/Service/TrainingAutomationService.php Match lines: 2 1701|private function executeNotifyResponsibleAction($action) 2530|private function executeNotifyMemberAction($action)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "isPayrollSystemSender|system_sender"}
Result
No matches found
Request #32
deepseek-v4-flash
P:32.25K C:462 CR:28.8K CW:0
3762ms
Reasoning
Wait, `code_search` for "isPayrollSystemSender|system_sender" returned no matches? That's odd — the diff added `system_sender`. Maybe the search only searches current file version. It should find "system_sender" in src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php at lines 7044, 13913, etc. Hmm, the search returned no matches. Perhaps the tool searches literal? It said case-insensitive defaults false? Actually default case-sensitive false. It searched across codebase with regex. No matches is weird.
Wait — maybe the review file contents are not in the current repo state (diff is applied to be reviewed, but current file version may already contain?). Actually file_read reads from "modified version (after changes) in git diff" — current workspace. Search should find them. Let me retry with separate literal search. Maybe the pipe regex needs escaping? It says supports regex. Let me retry literal.
Also let me read the service regions.
Let me read lines 6890-7120 to understand executeNotify and the emailConfig system_sender addition.
Then read lines 13860-14060 to understand the chat path.
And 14900-15300 for the new methods.
Let me do that in parallel.
Tool Calls (3)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 6880, "end_line": 7120}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15468)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 6880-7120
6880| [
6881| 'title' => $title,
6882| 'message' => $message,
6883| 'message_html' => $messageHtml,
6884| 'recipients' => $recipientTypes,
6885| 'template' => $templateSlug,
6886| ],
6887| $member,
6888| [
6889| 'title' => $title,
6890| 'message' => $message,
6891| 'message_html' => $messageHtml,
6892| ]
6893| );
6894| }
6895|
6896| private function executeNotifyEsocialWorkerData(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
6897| {
6898| if (!$member instanceof FlowInstanceMember) {
6899| return ['executed' => false, 'skipped' => true, 'reason' => 'missing_member'];
6900| }
6901|
6902| $company = $member->getFlowInstance()?->getCompany();
6903| if (!$company instanceof Company || $company->getEsocialMode() === null) {
6904| return ['executed' => false, 'skipped' => true, 'reason' => 'esocial_disabled'];
6905| }
6906|
6907| $companyMemberId = $member->getCompanyMember()?->getId();
6908| $notifyContext = $context;
6909| if ($companyMemberId) {
6910| $notifyContext['member_id'] = (string) $companyMemberId;
6911| }
6912|
6913| $title = 'Preencher dados do trabalhador e remuneração (eSocial)';
6914| $message = 'O colaborador {{member_name}} precisa ter os dados de trabalhador e remuneração preenchidos para o eSocial.';
6915| $messageHtml = '<p>O colaborador {{member_name}} precisa ter os dados de trabalhador e remuneração preenchidos para o eSocial.</p>';
6916|
6917| if ($companyMemberId) {
6918| $message .= ' Acesse: /my-company/member/{{member_id}}#dados_colaborador';
6919| $messageHtml .= '<p style="margin-top:1.25rem;"><a href="/my-company/member/{{member_id}}#dados_colaborador" style="display:inline-block;background-color:#277591;color:#ffffff;padding:10px 16px;border-radius:6px;font-weight:bold;text-decoration:none;">Preencher dados do colaborador</a></p>';
6920| }
6921|
6922| return $this->executeNotify(array_merge([
6923| 'to' => 'flow_responsible',
6924| 'title' => $title,
6925| 'message' => $message,
6926| 'message_html' => $messageHtml,
6927| ], $config), $member, $notifyContext);
6928| }
6929|
6930| private function executeNotify(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
6931| {
6932| $recipients = $config['recipients'] ?? [];
6933| $recipientType = $config['to'] ?? $config['recipient'] ?? null;
6934| $title = $config['title'] ?? $config['subject'] ?? null;
6935| $message = $config['message'] ?? $config['body'] ?? null;
6936| $messageHtml = $config['message_html'] ?? null;
6937| $type = $config['type'] ?? 'info';
6938| $templateSlug = $config['template'] ?? null;
6939|
6940| // Se recipients está vazio mas há 'to' ou 'recipient', usar como recipient único
6941| if (empty($recipients) && $recipientType) {
6942| $recipients = [$recipientType];
6943| }
6944|
6945| // Fallback: se não há destinatários definidos, enviar para responsável do fluxo
6946| if (empty($recipients)) {
6947| error_log("[NOTIFY] ⚠️ Nenhum destinatário definido (to/recipient/recipients vazios) - usando fallback 'flow_responsible'");
6948| $recipientType = 'flow_responsible';
6949| $recipients = ['flow_responsible'];
6950| }
6951|
6952| // 🎯 GERAR MENSAGEM AUTOMÁTICA se não foi fornecida
6953| if (empty($title) || empty($message)) {
6954| $autoMessage = $this->generateAutoNotificationMessage($member, $recipientType, $context);
6955| $title = $title ?: $autoMessage['title'];
6956| $message = $message ?: $autoMessage['message'];
6957| }
6958|
6959| $title = $this->replaceVariables($title, $member, $context);
6960| $message = $this->replaceVariables($message, $member, $context);
6961| if ($messageHtml !== null && $messageHtml !== '') {
6962| $messageHtml = $this->replaceVariables($messageHtml, $member, $context);
6963| } else {
6964| $messageHtml = null;
6965| }
6966|
6967| $emailTemplateBody = ($messageHtml !== null && $messageHtml !== '') ? $messageHtml : $message;
6968|
6969| $createdNotifications = [];
6970| $emailsSent = [];
6971| $chatMessagesSent = [];
6972|
6973| foreach ($recipients as $recipientType) {
6974| // Merge context with action config so recipient resolvers can reuse action-specific keys.
6975| // Example: manager_permission_products, role_id, company_member_id.
6976| // title/subject must be the already-replaced strings: CompanySenderGenerator renders
6977| // the DB template subject as Twig (e.g. "{{ title }} – {{ companyName }}"). If we keep
6978| // config['title'] here, placeholders like {{member_name}} inside the automation title stay literal.
6979| $recipientContext = array_merge($context, $config, [
6980| 'message' => $emailTemplateBody,
6981| 'body' => $emailTemplateBody,
6982| 'title' => $title,
6983| 'subject' => $title,
6984| ]);
6985| $users = $this->resolveRecipients($recipientType, $member, $recipientContext);
6986|
6987| foreach ($users as $user) {
6988| // 1️⃣ NOTIFICAÇÃO IN-APP (badge/popup)
6989| try {
6990| $notification = new \App\Entity\NotificationSpecialist();
6991| $notification->setUser($user);
6992| $notification->setTitle($title);
6993| $notification->setMessage($message);
6994| $notification->setIsRead(false);
6995| $notification->setCreatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
6996|
6997| $this->entityManager->persist($notification);
6998| $createdNotifications[] = $user->getId();
6999|
7000| if ($this->notificationsCenterService instanceof NotificationsCenterService) {
7001| $notificationType = \App\Entity\NotificationsCenter::TYPE_REQUEST;
7002| if (str_contains((string) $templateSlug, 'bpm-notification') || $type === 'info') {
7003| $notificationType = \App\Entity\NotificationsCenter::TYPE_SYSTEM;
7004| }
7005| $this->notificationsCenterService->createNotification(
7006| recipient: $user,
7007| hub: 'Hub de Operações',
7008| product: 'Workflow BPM',
7009| content: trim($title . ': ' . $message),
7010| type: $notificationType,
7011| sender: null,
7012| buttonUrl: '/chat?adriana=1',
7013| flush: false
7014| );
7015| }
7016|
7017| $this->log('info', '✅ Notificação in-app criada', [
7018| 'userId' => $user->getId(),
7019| 'title' => $title
7020| ]);
7021| } catch (\Exception $e) {
7022| $this->log('error', 'Erro ao criar notificação in-app', ['error' => $e->getMessage()]);
7023| }
7024|
7025| // 2️⃣ EMAIL (se houver template ou corpo)
7026| // NOTA: executeSendEmail() JÁ envia mensagem no chat automaticamente
7027| // conforme documentação (Email + Chat em um único canal)
7028| if ($templateSlug || !empty($emailTemplateBody)) {
7029| try {
7030| $emailConfig = [
7031| 'to' => $user->getEmail(),
7032| 'subject' => $title,
7033| 'body' => $emailTemplateBody,
7034| 'template' => $templateSlug,
7035| '_resolved_recipient_type' => $recipientType,
7036| // Keep request decision links when routing through executeSendEmail;
7037| // chat action buttons depend on these URLs.
7038| 'approve_url' => $config['approve_url'] ?? null,
7039| 'reject_url' => $config['reject_url'] ?? null,
7040| 'approve_button_text' => $config['approve_button_text'] ?? null,
7041| 'reject_button_text' => $config['reject_button_text'] ?? null,
7042| 'request_type_label' => $config['request_type_label'] ?? null,
7043| 'record_name' => $config['record_name'] ?? null,
7044| 'system_sender' => $config['system_sender'] ?? null,
7045| ];
7046| if (filter_var($config['skip_auto_email_template'] ?? false, FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN)) {
7047| $emailConfig['skip_auto_email_template'] = true;
7048| }
7049|
7050| $emailResult = $this->executeSendEmail($emailConfig, $member, $recipientContext);
7051|
7052| if ($emailResult['sent'] ?? false) {
7053| $emailsSent[] = $user->getEmail();
7054| // Contabilizar mensagens de chat enviadas automaticamente pelo executeSendEmail
7055| if (isset($emailResult['chatMessagesSent']) && $emailResult['chatMessagesSent'] > 0) {
7056| $chatMessagesSent = array_merge($chatMessagesSent, $emailResult['chatUserIds'] ?? []);
7057| }
7058| $this->log('info', '✅ Email enviado via notificação (chat incluído automaticamente)', [
7059| 'to' => $user->getEmail(),
7060| 'subject' => $title
7061| ]);
7062| }
7063| } catch (\Exception $e) {
7064| $this->log('error', 'Erro ao enviar email via notificação', [
7065| 'error' => $e->getMessage(),
7066| 'to' => $user->getEmail()
7067| ]);
7068| }
7069| }
7070| }
7071| }
7072|
7073| $this->entityManager->flush();
7074|
7075| return [
7076| 'notified' => count($createdNotifications),
7077| 'userIds' => $createdNotifications,
7078| 'emailsSent' => count($emailsSent),
7079| 'emails' => $emailsSent,
7080| 'chatMessagesSent' => count($chatMessagesSent),
7081| 'chatUserIds' => $chatMessagesSent
7082| ];
7083| }
7084|
7085| /**
7086| * Resolve financial-trail move destination by declarative stage key (YAML target_stage_key).
7087| * Isolated from payroll: only used when sourceType is financial_trail_record.
7088| */
7089| private function resolveFinancialMoveStageByKey(
7090| FlowInstanceMember $member,
7091| string $moduleSlug,
7092| string $stageKey,
7093| ): ?FlowStage {
7094| $stageKey = trim($stageKey);
7095| $moduleSlug = trim($moduleSlug);
7096| if ($stageKey === '' || $moduleSlug === '' || !FinancialFlowModuleStructure::isFinancialModuleSlug($moduleSlug)) {
7097| return null;
7098| }
7099|
7100| $template = $member->getCurrentStage()?->getFlowTemplate()
7101| ?? $member->getFlowInstance()?->getFlowTemplate();
7102| if (!$template instanceof FlowTemplate) {
7103| return null;
7104| }
7105|
7106| $resolvedName = null;
7107| $definition = FinancialFlowModuleStructure::getModuleDefinition($moduleSlug);
7108| foreach (($definition['stages'] ?? []) as $stageDef) {
7109| if (!is_array($stageDef)) {
7110| continue;
7111| }
7112| if ((string) ($stageDef['key'] ?? '') === $stageKey) {
7113| $resolvedName = trim((string) ($stageDef['name'] ?? ''));
7114| break;
7115| }
7116| }
7117| if ($resolvedName === null || $resolvedName === '') {
7118| return null;
7119| }
7120|
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 13840, "end_line": 14100}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15468)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 13840-14100
13840|
13841| if (!empty($chatUserIds)) {
13842| $this->log('info', '💬 Mensagens no chat enviadas automaticamente', [
13843| 'recipientType' => $recipientType,
13844| 'userIds' => $chatUserIds,
13845| 'count' => count($chatUserIds)
13846| ]);
13847| error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] ✅ SUCESSO - Enviado para " . count($chatUserIds) . " usuário(s)");
13848| }
13849|
13850| } catch (\Exception $e) {
13851| error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] ❌ ERRO: " . $e->getMessage());
13852| error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] Stack: " . $e->getTraceAsString());
13853|
13854| $this->log('error', 'Erro ao enviar mensagens no chat para tipo de destinatário', [
13855| 'recipientType' => $recipientType,
13856| 'error' => $e->getMessage()
13857| ]);
13858| }
13859|
13860| error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] FIM - Total enviado: " . count($chatUserIds));
13861|
13862| return $chatUserIds;
13863| }
13864|
13865| /**
13866| * Envia mensagem no chat - canal compartilhado OU mensagem direta
13867| *
13868| * - employee/collaborator/candidate → Mensagem DIRETA do manager para o usuário
13869| * - flow_responsible/responsible/manager/outros → Canal "Suporte Meta" compartilhado
13870| *
13871| * @param User $user Destinatário da mensagem
13872| * @param string $title Título/assunto
13873| * @param string $message Corpo da mensagem
13874| * @param FlowInstanceMember|null $member Membro do fluxo (para contexto)
13875| * @param string|null $recipientType Tipo de destinatário (employee, flow_responsible, etc.)
13876| * @return array ['sent' => bool, 'conversationId' => int|null, 'messageId' => int|null]
13877| */
13878| private function sendChatNotification(User $user, string $title, string $message, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, ?string $recipientType = null, array $config = []): array
13879| {
13880| try {
13881| // 1. Obter a empresa do membro/usuário
13882| $company = null;
13883| if ($member && $member->getFlowInstance()) {
13884| $company = $member->getFlowInstance()->getCompany();
13885| }
13886|
13887| if (!$company) {
13888| // Tentar obter empresa do usuário via CompanyMembers
13889| $companyMember = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\CompanyMembers::class)
13890| ->findOneBy(['user' => $user]);
13891| if ($companyMember) {
13892| $company = $companyMember->getCompany();
13893| }
13894| }
13895|
13896| if (!$company) {
13897| $this->log('warning', 'Não foi possível determinar empresa para envio de chat', [
13898| 'userId' => $user->getId()
13899| ]);
13900| return ['sent' => false, 'error' => 'Empresa não encontrada'];
13901| }
13902|
13903| // 2. Determinar canal:
13904| // - CRM responsibles (record_owner/board_owner) must receive direct messages
13905| // - employee/collaborator/candidate already use direct mode
13906| // - request_notification actions (com approve_url/reject_url) também devem ser mensagens diretas,
13907| // independente do recipient_type (ex.: direct_manager, company_member no assessment)
13908| $isRequestNotification = !empty($config['approve_url']) || !empty($config['reject_url']);
13909| // Notificações sistêmicas são geradas pela assistente "Adriana",
13910| // não por um gestor específico: a mensagem no chat deve sair sem remetente
13911| // (userId = null), que o front renderiza como Adriana/Sistema.
13912| $isSystemSender = filter_var($config['system_sender'] ?? false, FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN)
13913| || ($member instanceof FlowInstanceMember
13914| && $member->getSourceType() === PayrollClosingBpmnService::SOURCE_TYPE);
13915| // 'direct' is used by sendChatToSpecificEmails when the user was already resolved —
13916| // always send a personal direct message in that case.
13917| // training_group_responsible / responsible also get direct messages.
13918| $isDirectMessage = $isRequestNotification
13919| || in_array($recipientType, [
13920| 'employee', 'collaborator', 'candidate',
13921| 'record_owner', 'board_owner',
13922| 'direct_manager', 'company_member', 'flow_responsible',
13923| 'responsible', 'training_group_responsible',
13924| 'direct',
13925| ], true);
13926|
13927| $fullMessage = "📢 **{$title}**\n\n{$message}";
13928|
13929| // Sistema: o remetente é a própria Adriana, então a notificação deve cair na
13930| // conversa exclusiva da Adriana (ai_assistant) do destinatário — e não numa conversa
13931| // "individual" entre gestores. Isso também evita o caso em que, quando destinatário e
13932| // gestor da empresa são o mesmo usuário, a busca por conversa individual acabava
13933| // recaindo na conversa de outra pessoa.
13934| if ($isSystemSender) {
13935| $assistantConversation = $this->getOrCreateAssistantConversation($user);
13936| if (!$assistantConversation) {
13937| return ['sent' => false, 'error' => 'Não foi possível obter a conversa da Adriana'];
13938| }
13939|
13940| $this->initializeChatUnreadBaseline($assistantConversation, $user);
13941|
13942| $chatMessage = new \App\Entity\ChatMessage();
13943| $chatMessage->setConversationId($assistantConversation->getId());
13944| $chatMessage->setConversation($assistantConversation);
13945| $chatMessage->setUserId(null); // Mensagem da Adriana em conversa ai_assistant
13946| $chatMessage->setMessage($fullMessage);
13947| $chatMessage->setTimestamp(new \DateTime());
13948| $chatMessage->setIsInitialMessage(false);
13949|
13950| $this->entityManager->persist($chatMessage);
13951| $this->entityManager->flush();
13952|
13953| return [
13954| 'sent' => true,
13955| 'conversationId' => $assistantConversation->getId(),
13956| 'messageId' => $chatMessage->getId()
13957| ];
13958| }
13959|
13960| if ($isDirectMessage) {
13961| // ===== MENSAGEM DIRETA: Manager → Employee =====
13962| error_log("💬 [sendChatNotification] Modo DIRETO para recipientType={$recipientType}");
13963|
13964| // Buscar ROLE_MANAGER da empresa
13965| $adminUser = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\User::class)
13966| ->createQueryBuilder('u')
13967| ->where('u.company = :company')
13968| ->andWhere('u.roles LIKE :role')
13969| ->setParameter('company', $company)
13970| ->setParameter('role', '%ROLE_MANAGER%')
13971| ->setMaxResults(1)
13972| ->getQuery()
13973| ->getOneOrNullResult();
13974|
13975| if (!$adminUser) {
13976| return ['sent' => false, 'error' => 'Admin da empresa não encontrado'];
13977| }
13978|
13979| // Buscar ou criar conversa individual entre manager e employee
13980| $individualConversation = $this->getOrCreateIndividualConversation($adminUser, $user, $company);
13981|
13982| if (!$individualConversation) {
13983| return ['sent' => false, 'error' => 'Não foi possível criar conversa individual'];
13984| }
13985|
13986| $chatMessage = new \App\Entity\ChatMessage();
13987| $chatMessage->setConversationId($individualConversation->getId());
13988| $chatMessage->setConversation($individualConversation);
13989| $chatMessage->setUserId($adminUser->getId());
13990| $chatMessage->setMessage($fullMessage);
13991| $chatMessage->setTimestamp(new \DateTime());
13992| $chatMessage->setIsInitialMessage(false);
13993|
13994| $this->entityManager->persist($chatMessage);
13995| $this->entityManager->flush();
13996|
13997| return [
13998| 'sent' => true,
13999| 'conversationId' => $individualConversation->getId(),
14000| 'messageId' => $chatMessage->getId()
14001| ];
14002| } else {
14003| // ===== CANAL COMPARTILHADO: Suporte Meta =====
14004| error_log("💬 [sendChatNotification] Modo COMPARTILHADO (Suporte Meta) para recipientType={$recipientType}");
14005|
14006| $supportConversation = $this->getOrCreateSupportConversation($company);
14007|
14008| if (!$supportConversation) {
14009| return ['sent' => false, 'error' => 'Não foi possível criar/encontrar canal de suporte'];
14010| }
14011|
14012| $this->ensureUserParticipation($user, $supportConversation);
14013|
14014| $chatMessage = new \App\Entity\ChatMessage();
14015| $chatMessage->setConversationId($supportConversation->getId());
14016| $chatMessage->setConversation($supportConversation);
14017| $chatMessage->setUserId(null); // Mensagem do SISTEMA
14018| $chatMessage->setMessage($fullMessage);
14019| $chatMessage->setTimestamp(new \DateTime());
14020| $chatMessage->setIsInitialMessage(true); // Sistema para renderização correta
14021|
14022| $this->entityManager->persist($chatMessage);
14023| $this->entityManager->flush();
14024|
14025| return [
14026| 'sent' => true,
14027| 'conversationId' => $supportConversation->getId(),
14028| 'messageId' => $chatMessage->getId()
14029| ];
14030| }
14031|
14032| } catch (\Exception $e) {
14033| $this->log('error', 'Erro ao enviar mensagem no chat', [
14034| 'error' => $e->getMessage(),
14035| 'trace' => $e->getTraceAsString()
14036| ]);
14037|
14038| return [
14039| 'sent' => false,
14040| 'error' => $e->getMessage()
14041| ];
14042| }
14043| }
14044|
14045|
14046| /**
14047| * Busca ou cria conversa INDIVIDUAL entre admin da empresa e um candidato
14048| *
14049| * @param \App\Entity\User $adminUser User admin da empresa
14050| * @param \App\Entity\User $candidateUser Candidato
14051| * @param \App\Entity\Company $company Empresa
14052| * @return \App\Entity\ChatConversation|null
14053| */
14054| private function getOrCreateIndividualConversation(\App\Entity\User $adminUser, \App\Entity\User $candidateUser, \App\Entity\Company $company): ?\App\Entity\ChatConversation
14055| {
14056| // Buscar conversa individual existente entre admin e candidato
14057| $conversations = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\ChatConversation::class)
14058| ->createQueryBuilder('c')
14059| ->where('c.type = :type')
14060| ->setParameter('type', 'individual')
14061| ->getQuery()
14062| ->getResult();
14063|
14064| foreach ($conversations as $conversation) {
14065| // Buscar participantes desta conversa
14066| $participants = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\ChatConversationParticipant::class)
14067| ->findBy(['conversationId' => $conversation->getId()]);
14068|
14069| $participantIds = array_map(fn($p) => $p->getUserId(), $participants);
14070|
14071| // Verificar se admin e candidato são os únicos participantes
14072| if (count($participantIds) === 2 &&
14073| in_array($adminUser->getId(), $participantIds) &&
14074| in_array($candidateUser->getId(), $participantIds)) {
14075| return $conversation; // Conversa já existe
14076| }
14077| }
14078|
14079| // Criar nova conversa individual
14080| $conversation = new \App\Entity\ChatConversation();
14081| $conversation->setType('individual');
14082| $conversation->setTitle(null); // Conversas individuais não têm título
14083| $conversation->setOwnerId($adminUser->getId());
14084| $conversation->setCreatedAt(new \DateTime());
14085|
14086| $this->entityManager->persist($conversation);
14087| $this->entityManager->flush();
14088|
14089| // Adicionar admin como participante
14090| $adminParticipant = new \App\Entity\ChatConversationParticipant();
14091| $adminParticipant->setUserId($adminUser->getId());
14092| $adminParticipant->setConversationId($conversation->getId());
14093| $adminParticipant->setConversation($conversation);
14094| $this->entityManager->persist($adminParticipant);
14095|
14096| // Adicionar candidato como participante
14097| $candidateParticipant = new \App\Entity\ChatConversationParticipant();
14098| $candidateParticipant->setUserId($candidateUser->getId());
14099| $candidateParticipant->setConversationId($conversation->getId());
14100| $candidateParticipant->setConversation($conversation);
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "system_sender"}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 3 7044| 'system_sender' => $config['system_sender'] ?? null, 13912| $isSystemSender = filter_var($config['system_sender'] ?? false, FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN) 15049| 'system_sender' => true,
Request #33
deepseek-v4-flash
P:39.84K C:478 CR:32.64K CW:0
3786ms
Reasoning
Now I need to check the chat path: does `executeNotify` actually route through `sendChatNotification` with config containing 'system_sender'? Let me trace: In executeNotify, for emails it calls executeSendEmail with $emailConfig (which includes system_sender). For chat-only notifications (no template / no body?) there may be a path that calls sendChatNotification directly. Where is sendChatNotification called from? Let me find where `system_sender` config propagates in executeNotify for chat. Looking at executeNotify code: it creates notifications in-app and emails; the chat is via executeSendEmail for template. But is there a call to sendChatNotification? Let me search where `sendChatNotification(` is called.
Actually the modified code at 13903-13913 is in `sendChatNotification`, which receives $config. Its callers may pass $config. Need to check the callers and whether 'system_sender' reaches them.
But note the diff at 13903 — the change introduced `$config['system_sender']`, where $config is the parameter of sendChatNotification. That method is invoked from many places; they need to pass system_sender.
Let me read executeNotify's end: does it call sendChatNotification anywhere? Let me search for sendChatNotification callers within this file.
Also, need to check the new code region 14924-15260 for the added methods to fully review.
Let me read that region.
Tool Calls (3)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 14920, "end_line": 15300}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15468)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 14920-15300
14920| if ($member->getSourceType() !== 'offboarding') {
14921| return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Esta ação só pode ser usada em contexto de offboarding'];
14922| }
14923|
14924| return $this->offboardingToRecruitment->createFromOffboarding($member, $config, $context);
14925| }
14926|
14927| private function executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
14928| {
14929| if (!$member instanceof FlowInstanceMember) {
14930| return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Membro não encontrado'];
14931| }
14932|
14933| if ($member->getSourceType() !== 'offboarding') {
14934| return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Esta ação só pode ser usada em contexto de offboarding'];
14935| }
14936|
14937| $flowInstance = $member->getFlowInstance();
14938| $company = $flowInstance?->getCompany();
14939| if (!$company instanceof Company || $company->getEsocialMode() === null) {
14940| return ['executed' => false, 'skipped' => true, 'reason' => 'esocial_disabled'];
14941| }
14942|
14943| try {
14944| $offboardingMember = $this->findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember($member);
14945| if (!$offboardingMember) {
14946| return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'OffboardingMember não encontrado'];
14947| }
14948|
14949| $companyMember = $offboardingMember->getCompanyMember();
14950| if (!$companyMember instanceof CompanyMembers) {
14951| return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Colaborador do offboarding não encontrado'];
14952| }
14953|
14954| $responsible = $this->resolveEsocialS2299Responsible($config, $member, $offboardingMember);
14955| if (!$responsible instanceof CompanyMembers) {
14956| $this->log('warning', 'Responsável do S-2299 não resolvido para automação de offboarding', [
14957| 'flowInstanceMemberId' => $member->getId(),
14958| 'offboardingMemberId' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
14959| ]);
14960|
14961| return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Responsável pelo preenchimento do S-2299 não encontrado'];
14962| }
14963|
14964| $esocialTrabalhador = $this->entityManager
14965| ->getRepository(EsocialDadosTrabalhador::class)
14966| ->findOneBy(['companyMember' => $companyMember]);
14967|
14968| $payload = $this->buildEsocialS2299DraftPayload($offboardingMember, $companyMember, $responsible, $config);
14969| $event = null;
14970| $eventStatus = 'draft_only';
14971| $missing = [];
14972|
14973| if (!$esocialTrabalhador instanceof EsocialDadosTrabalhador) {
14974| $missing[] = 'esocial_worker_data';
14975| } else {
14976| $remuneracao = $this->entityManager
14977| ->getRepository(EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class)
14978| ->findByTrabalhador($esocialTrabalhador);
14979|
14980| if (!$remuneracao instanceof EsocialDadosRemuneracao) {
14981| $missing[] = 'esocial_remuneration_data';
14982| } else {
14983| $latestEvent = $this->findLatestEsocialS2299Event($esocialTrabalhador);
14984| if ($latestEvent instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $latestEvent->getStatus() !== 'pendente') {
14985| $event = $latestEvent;
14986| $eventStatus = 'existing_not_editable';
14987| } elseif ($latestEvent instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
14988| $event = $latestEvent;
14989| $event->setUpdatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
14990| $eventStatus = 'updated';
14991| } else {
14992| $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
14993| $event->setModo('INC');
14994| $event->setCompany($company);
14995| $event->setTpAmb($company->getEsocialMode() ?? '2');
14996| $event->setTpInscTransmissor(1);
14997| $event->setNrInscTransmissor($this->onlyDigits((string) $company->getCnpj()));
14998| $event->setEsocialTrabalhador($esocialTrabalhador);
14999| $event->setIndRetif(1);
15000| $event->setStatus('pendente');
15001| $event->setCreatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
15002| $eventStatus = 'created';
15003| }
15004|
15005| if ($eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable') {
15006| $event->setDadosRemuneracao($remuneracao);
15007| $this->applyEsocialS2299Payload($event, $payload);
15008| $this->entityManager->persist($event);
15009| }
15010| }
15011| }
15012|
15013| $reviewUrl = $this->buildEsocialS2299ReviewUrl($companyMember);
15014| $metadata = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? [];
15015| if (!is_array($metadata)) {
15016| $metadata = [];
15017| }
15018|
15019| $metadata['esocialS2299Draft'] = [
15020| 'payload' => $payload,
15021| 'offboardingMemberId' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
15022| 'companyMemberId' => $companyMember->getId(),
15023| 'responsibleId' => $responsible->getId(),
15024| 'eventId' => $event?->getId(),
15025| 'eventStatus' => $eventStatus,
15026| 'missing' => $missing,
15027| 'reviewUrl' => $reviewUrl,
15028| 'updatedAt' => (new \DateTimeImmutable())->format('c'),
15029| ];
15030|
15031| $member->setSourceMetadata($metadata);
15032| $this->entityManager->persist($member);
15033| $this->entityManager->flush();
15034|
15035| if ($event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento) {
15036| $metadata = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? [];
15037| $metadata['esocialS2299Draft']['eventId'] = $event->getId();
15038| $member->setSourceMetadata($metadata);
15039| $this->entityManager->persist($member);
15040| $this->entityManager->flush();
15041| }
15042|
15043| $notification = $this->executeNotify([
15044| 'to' => 'company_member',
15045| 'company_member_id' => (string) $responsible->getId(),
15046| 'title' => 'Revisar desligamento eSocial (S-2299)',
15047| 'message' => 'O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding. Abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar os detalhes.',
15048| 'message_html' => '<p>O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding.</p><p style="margin-top:1.25rem;"><a href="' . htmlspecialchars($reviewUrl, ENT_QUOTES, 'UTF-8') . '" style="display:inline-block;background-color:#277591;color:#ffffff;padding:10px 16px;border-radius:6px;font-weight:bold;text-decoration:none;">Revisar desligamento eSocial</a></p>',
15049| 'system_sender' => true,
15050| ], $member, array_merge($context, [
15051| 'member_id' => (string) $companyMember->getId(),
15052| 'esocial_s2299_review_url' => $reviewUrl,
15053| ]));
15054|
15055| return [
15056| 'success' => true,
15057| 'message' => $event instanceof EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento && $eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable'
15058| ? 'Rascunho do S-2299 criado/atualizado e responsável notificado'
15059| : ($eventStatus === 'existing_not_editable'
15060| ? 'Rascunho do S-2299 registrado; já existe evento oficial não editável para este trabalhador'
15061| : 'Rascunho do S-2299 registrado; dados eSocial pendentes impedem criar o evento oficial'),
15062| 'offboardingMemberId' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
15063| 'companyMemberId' => $companyMember->getId(),
15064| 'responsibleId' => $responsible->getId(),
15065| 'eventId' => $event?->getId(),
15066| 'eventStatus' => $eventStatus,
15067| 'missing' => $missing,
15068| 'reviewUrl' => $reviewUrl,
15069| 'notification' => $notification,
15070| ];
15071| } catch (\Throwable $e) {
15072| $this->log('error', 'Erro ao criar rascunho S-2299 via offboarding', [
15073| 'error' => $e->getMessage(),
15074| 'memberId' => $member->getId(),
15075| ]);
15076|
15077| return ['success' => false, 'error' => $e->getMessage()];
15078| }
15079| }
15080|
15081| private function resolveEsocialS2299Responsible(array $config, FlowInstanceMember $member, \App\Entity\OffboardingMember $offboardingMember): ?CompanyMembers
15082| {
15083| $configuredId = $config['responsible_id']
15084| ?? $config['responsibleId']
15085| ?? $config['company_member_id']
15086| ?? $config['member_id']
15087| ?? null;
15088|
15089| if ($configuredId) {
15090| $responsible = $this->entityManager->getRepository(CompanyMembers::class)->find((int) $configuredId);
15091| if ($responsible instanceof CompanyMembers) {
15092| return $responsible;
15093| }
15094| }
15095|
15096| $flowResponsible = $member->getFlowInstance()?->getFlowResponsible();
15097| if ($flowResponsible instanceof CompanyMembers) {
15098| return $flowResponsible;
15099| }
15100|
15101| $offboardingResponsible = $offboardingMember->getOffboarding()?->getOffboardingFlowResponsible();
15102| if ($offboardingResponsible instanceof CompanyMembers) {
15103| return $offboardingResponsible;
15104| }
15105|
15106| return null;
15107| }
15108|
15109| private function buildEsocialS2299DraftPayload(
15110| \App\Entity\OffboardingMember $offboardingMember,
15111| CompanyMembers $companyMember,
15112| CompanyMembers $responsible,
15113| array $config
15114| ): array {
15115| $dismissalDate = $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate() ?? $offboardingMember->getRequestedAt();
15116|
15117| return [
15118| 'member' => $companyMember->getId(),
15119| 'motivoDesligamento' => $config['motivoDesligamento'] ?? $config['mtvDeslig'] ?? '',
15120| 'dataDesligamento' => $dismissalDate ? $dismissalDate->format('Y-m-d') : '',
15121| 'dataConcessaoAviso' => $config['dataConcessaoAviso'] ?? '',
15122| 'avisoPrevioIndenizado' => $config['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ?? '',
15123| 'dataTerminoAviso' => $config['dataTerminoAviso'] ?? '',
15124| 'pensAlim' => $config['pensAlim'] ?? '',
15125| 'percAliment' => $config['percAliment'] ?? '',
15126| 'vrAlim' => $config['vrAlim'] ?? '',
15127| 'numeroProcesso' => $config['numeroProcesso'] ?? '',
15128| 'indPdv' => $config['indPdv'] ?? '',
15129| 'cpfSubstituto' => $config['cpfSubstituto'] ?? '',
15130| 'dataNascimentoTitular' => $config['dataNascimentoTitular'] ?? '',
15131| 'novoCpfTrabalhador' => $config['novoCpfTrabalhador'] ?? '',
15132| 'indRemun' => $config['indRemun'] ?? '',
15133| 'dtFimRemun' => $config['dtFimRemun'] ?? '',
15134| 'matriculaInstituicao' => $config['matriculaInstituicao'] ?? '',
15135| 'numeroContrato' => $config['numeroContrato'] ?? '',
15136| '_offboarding' => [
15137| 'offboardingMemberId' => $offboardingMember->getId(),
15138| 'offboardingId' => $offboardingMember->getOffboarding()?->getId(),
15139| 'reason' => $offboardingMember->getReason(),
15140| 'responsibleId' => $responsible->getId(),
15141| 'responsibleName' => $responsible->getFullName(),
15142| ],
15143| ];
15144| }
15145|
15146| private function findLatestEsocialS2299Event(EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador): ?EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
15147| {
15148| return $this->entityManager
15149| ->getRepository(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class)
15150| ->findOneBy(
15151| ['esocialTrabalhador' => $esocialTrabalhador],
15152| ['id' => 'DESC']
15153| );
15154| }
15155|
15156| private function applyEsocialS2299Payload(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $event, array $payload): void
15157| {
15158| $event->setMtvDeslig($this->stringOrNull($payload['motivoDesligamento'] ?? null));
15159| $event->setDtDeslig($this->dateOrNull($payload['dataDesligamento'] ?? null));
15160| $event->setDtAvPrv($this->dateOrNull($payload['dataConcessaoAviso'] ?? null));
15161| $event->setIndPagtoApi($this->booleanStringOrNull($payload['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ?? null));
15162| $event->setDtProjFimApi($this->dateOrNull($payload['dataTerminoAviso'] ?? null));
15163| $event->setPensAlim($this->intOrNull($payload['pensAlim'] ?? null));
15164| $event->setPercAliment($this->intOrNull($payload['percAliment'] ?? null));
15165| $event->setVrAlim($this->intOrNull($payload['vrAlim'] ?? null));
15166| $event->setNrProcTrab($this->stringOrNull($payload['numeroProcesso'] ?? null));
15167| $event->setIndPdv($this->stringOrNull($payload['indPdv'] ?? null));
15168| $event->setCpfSubstituto($this->cpfOrNull($payload['cpfSubstituto'] ?? null));
15169| $event->setDtNascto($this->dateOrNull($payload['dataNascimentoTitular'] ?? null));
15170| $event->setNovoCpf($this->cpfOrNull($payload['novoCpfTrabalhador'] ?? null));
15171| $event->setIndRemun($this->intOrNull($payload['indRemun'] ?? null));
15172| $event->setDtFimRemun($this->dateOrNull($payload['dtFimRemun'] ?? null));
15173| $event->setInsConsig($this->stringOrNull($payload['matriculaInstituicao'] ?? null));
15174| $event->setNrContr($this->stringOrNull($payload['numeroContrato'] ?? null));
15175| }
15176|
15177| private function buildEsocialS2299ReviewUrl(CompanyMembers $companyMember): string
15178| {
15179| $path = $this->router
15180| ? $this->router->generate('my_company_member_manage', ['member' => $companyMember->getId()])
15181| : '/my-company/member/' . $companyMember->getId();
15182|
15183| return $path . '?esocialTab=desligamento';
15184| }
15185|
15186| private function dateOrNull(mixed $value): ?\DateTimeInterface
15187| {
15188| if ($value instanceof \DateTimeInterface) {
15189| return \DateTime::createFromInterface($value);
15190| }
15191|
15192| $value = is_scalar($value) ? trim((string) $value) : '';
15193| if ($value === '') {
15194| return null;
15195| }
15196|
15197| try {
15198| return new \DateTime($value);
15199| } catch (\Throwable) {
15200| return null;
15201| }
15202| }
15203|
15204| private function stringOrNull(mixed $value): ?string
15205| {
15206| $value = is_scalar($value) ? trim((string) $value) : '';
15207| return $value !== '' ? $value : null;
15208| }
15209|
15210| private function intOrNull(mixed $value): ?int
15211| {
15212| if ($value === null || $value === '') {
15213| return null;
15214| }
15215|
15216| return is_numeric($value) ? (int) $value : null;
15217| }
15218|
15219| private function booleanStringOrNull(mixed $value): ?string
15220| {
15221| if ($value === null || $value === '') {
15222| return null;
15223| }
15224|
15225| if (is_bool($value)) {
15226| return $value ? 'S' : 'N';
15227| }
15228|
15229| $normalized = strtoupper(trim((string) $value));
15230| if (in_array($normalized, ['S', 'SIM', 'YES', 'TRUE', '1'], true)) {
15231| return 'S';
15232| }
15233| if (in_array($normalized, ['N', 'NAO', 'NÃO', 'NO', 'FALSE', '0'], true)) {
15234| return 'N';
15235| }
15236|
15237| return null;
15238| }
15239|
15240| private function cpfOrNull(mixed $value): ?string
15241| {
15242| $digits = $this->onlyDigits(is_scalar($value) ? (string) $value : '');
15243| return $digits !== '' ? $digits : null;
15244| }
15245|
15246| private function onlyDigits(string $value): string
15247| {
15248| return preg_replace('/\D/', '', $value) ?? '';
15249| }
15250|
15251| // ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
15252| // VISIBILIDADE E ACESSO - OFFBOARDING
15253| // ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
15254|
15255| /**
15256| * Ação: Aguardar X dias para exibir offboarding ao colaborador
15257| *
15258| * Esta ação configura um delay antes do offboarding ser visível para o colaborador.
15259| * O offboarding só será exibido na tela do colaborador após X dias.
15260| *
15261| * - Define `visible_to_collaborator = false` imediatamente
15262| * - Define `visible_at` para a data futura (created_at + X dias)
15263| * - O scheduler ou listener deve verificar essa data e habilitar quando chegar
15264| */
15265| private function executeDelayOffboardingVisibility(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
15266| {
15267| if (!$member) {
15268| return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Membro não encontrado'];
15269| }
15270|
15271| if ($member->getSourceType() !== 'offboarding') {
15272| return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Esta ação só pode ser usada em contexto de offboarding'];
15273| }
15274|
15275| $days = (int) ($config['value'] ?? $config['days'] ?? 0);
15276|
15277| if ($days <= 0) {
15278| return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'Número de dias inválido'];
15279| }
15280|
15281| try {
15282| // Buscar OffboardingMember
15283| $offboardingMember = $this->findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember($member);
15284|
15285| if (!$offboardingMember) {
15286| error_log("[AUTOMATION] ❌ delay_offboarding_visibility: OffboardingMember NÃO encontrado para FIM #{$member->getId()}");
15287| return ['success' => false, 'error' => 'OffboardingMember não encontrado'];
15288| }
15289|
15290| $omId = $offboardingMember->getId();
15291| $previousVisibleToCollaborator = $offboardingMember->getVisibleToCollaborator();
15292|
15293| error_log("[AUTOMATION] delay_offboarding_visibility: Processando OM #{$omId}, visible_to_collaborator anterior = " . ($previousVisibleToCollaborator ? 'true' : 'false'));
15294|
15295| // Calcular data de visibilidade
15296| $visibleAt = new \DateTime();
15297| $visibleAt->modify("+{$days} days");
15298|
15299| // Configurar visibilidade
15300| $offboardingMember->setVisibleToCollaborator(false);
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "sendChatNotification("}
Result
File: .docs/NOTIFICACOES_MULTIPLOS_CANAIS.md Match lines: 5 156|#### **3. `sendChatNotification()` - Criado anteriormente** 158|private function sendChatNotification(User $user, string $title, string $message, ?FlowInstanceMember $member): array 301| - `sendChatNotification()` → Mantido 384|#### **2. `sendChatNotification()`** 386|private function sendChatNotification(User $user, string $title, string $message, ?FlowInstanceMember $member): array File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 3 13775| $result = $this->sendChatNotification($user, $subject, $chatBody, $member, 'direct', $config); 13832| $result = $this->sendChatNotification($user, $subject, $chatBody, $member, $recipientType, $config); 13878| private function sendChatNotification(User $user, string $title, string $message, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, ?string $recipientType = null, array $config = []): array
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft|create_esocial_s2299_draft"}
Result
No matches found
Request #34
deepseek-v4-flash
P:46.15K C:3.33K CR:40.19K CW:0
24625ms
Reasoning
Interesting — code_search for `create_esocial_s2299_draft` no matches? But we saw lines 13912 etc with system_sender found; line 15049 system_sender found. Yet search for executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft found no matches in the codebase? Odd — the code exists at line 14927. Maybe search only searches in files in current version but there might be an issue with search over large file (truncated?). Actually the previous search "isPayrollSystemSender|system_sender" returned "No matches found" but "system_sender" alone found 3 matches. Perhaps regex with pipe didn't work because of searching? But executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft is a plain string, should match. Unless the file we read is not the one in the search index? Wait, but the file read shows it exists at line 14927. Hmm.
Maybe the code_search index is limited to 100 matches and returns truncated? Or perhaps searches only files matched by default patterns — maybe it only searches PHP files in src? We got matches from src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php for system_sender at 7044,13912,15049. That's the same file. Weird that executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft returns no match. Let me try again with different text maybe "executeCreateEsocial". Possibly case-sensitivity? default false, so case-insensitive. Hmm.
Wait, maybe the pipe character issue in first search: "isPayrollSystemSender|system_sender" as regex needs the tool param `use_perl_regexp: true`. I didn't pass it, so it's treated as literal text including `|`, hence no match. That explains. For the third search, literal "executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft" should match though. Unless the search engine requires... hmm. Actually maybe the issue: the file_read at 14920 shows these methods, so they exist. The code_search may have a different working state (maybe matches against the committed version without the diff? No — it found system_sender lines that are part of the new diff!). Wait, system_sender at 7044, 13912, 15049 are all added lines in this diff. So search does index current state including additions.
Then why no match for executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft? Odd. Could be there's an index limit: if more than 100 matches... no, no matches at all reported. Maybe the search tool requires the file to be matched by file patterns default "*"? The default presumably covers the whole repo. Actually maybe search indexes only first N lines? Perhaps the search result truncation... The file is 15468 lines. system_sender at 7044 and 15049 both matched, so indexing covers the file fully.
Hmm, maybe the string is exactly "executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft" with capital E, but default case-insensitive. Weird. Let me not worry: perhaps the search uses a tokenization, and the token with numbers doesn't match? Whatever. I'll use file_read directly for confirming things.
Now let me consider more issues.
Key concern areas:
1. In executeNotify, when route through executeSendEmail with system_sender — but for the new S-2299 automation, config includes message_html with link and 'to' => 'company_member', 'company_member_id', 'title', 'message', 'message_html', 'system_sender' => true. executeNotify then for each recipient user (the responsible person), creates an in-app notification and calls executeSendEmail with emailConfig (with template = null, since no templateSlug; body present) that sends an email and chat. But note executeSendEmail's chat path is where sendChatForRecipientType calls sendChatNotification with $config = emailConfig, which now contains system_sender => true (bool true) — wait emailConfig['system_sender'] = $config['system_sender'] ?? null → true. filter_var(true, FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN) → true. So the chat goes to the assistant conversation. Good.
Now the notification also produces in-app NotificationSpecialist with buttonUrl '/chat?adriana=1'. OK.
But wait, resolveRecipients with 'to' => 'company_member' and company_member_id => responsible id. But member (FlowInstanceMember) has companyMember = the leaving employee, not the responsible. The recipient resolution should use company_member_id to find responsible. Let's check resolveRecipients handles company_member_id key. Presumably yes.
Now message has {{member_name}} placeholder — replaced with context member_id (the companyMember id of the leaving employee). replaceVariables($message, $member, $context) presumably resolves member_name from member_id in context. OK.
2. Now the sendChatNotification with system_sender true goes into the Adriana conversation. That part appears intentional.
But consider: executeNotify also sets up the NotificationsCenter with type TYPE_SYSTEM if type==='info'. type default is 'info'. OK.
3. Potential data issue: the notification message_html is set to a string containing the review URL (raw anchor). That means the email body (if an email is sent because message_html exists → emailTemplateBody set) would contain the link. That's email. Fine.
Now the actual route to Adriana conversation for the "ver detalhes" — In-app notification buttonUrl '/chat?adriana=1'. OK.
4. Now let me think about issues that might be worth reporting beyond confirmed:
A. The chat message for system sender is stored with `setMessage($fullMessage)` where $fullMessage includes title and message (markdown bold). For the Adriana conversation maybe not HTML. Fine.
B. When system_sender but the recipient also has a direct manager scenario? Since system_sender path takes precedence before isDirectMessage. OK.
C. Payload: In `buildEsocialS2299DraftPayload`, dismissalDate uses `getDismissalDate() ?? getRequestedAt()`. Wait: is using requestedAt as fallback for dismissal date semantically correct? For an offboarding that hasn't been dismissed yet? Actually event created on stage final (on_enter of final stage). The dismissal date might be in the future or not set. If the user set exit date elsewhere... They use requestedAt as the fallback, which would fill dataDesligamento = date offboarding started. Possibly wrong date for eSocial termination event, but it's a "draft". Not sure it's a bug; maybe acceptable.
Actually think: The eSocial S-2299 event requires the dismissal date. Using the requestedAt of the offboarding (when it began) as the dismissal date is very likely wrong — but maybe the getDismissalDate is normally set. It's a fallback only. Might be flagged as low severity.
D. Now examine automation trigger: When the automation executes on_enter of final stage, does the FlowInstanceMember's sourceMetadata get reset or overwritten each time? The action merges only the 'esocialS2299Draft' key.
E. The event Status handling: newly created events get status 'pendente'. `findLatest...` picks most recent by id DESC. If existing event pendente, update it (overwriting payload). This was already flagged (finding #4).
F. The code does NOT verify that company member belongs to the same company/flow; but it derives from offboardingMember.
G. There may be a real issue: In executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft, notify is called even when eventStatus is 'existing_not_editable' or missing data; but when missing data (draft_only) then event null. That is by design to notify responsible.
H. Potential issue: In the `updated`/`created` case, they persist event but then flush earlier for member metadata before persisting event? Actually they persist event and then persist member and flush once — that flush also persists the event (persisted earlier). Good.
I. Potential subtle bug: the metadata eventId flush occurs after flush; event getId available. Fine.
J. Now `executeNotify` returns array; the returned `notification` recorded. Fine.
K. Potential bug: When the automation executes while esocial mode disabled (skipped true), it returns early and does not record metadata or notify. Acceptable per code? It's like other actions e.g. executeNotifyEsocialWorkerData skips.
L. Another angle: The `dateOrNull` uses `new \DateTime($value)`. For date string with just 'Y-m-d', ok.
M. `intOrNull` for percAliment/vrAlim already flagged (#6).
N. Fields setTpAmb: When creating new event with `$company->getEsocialMode() ?? '2'` — but early return means getEsocialMode() is not null. Fine.
O. The event new: sets `setNrInscTransmissor($this->onlyDigits((string) $company->getCnpj()))`. Company cnpj may contain digits already. OK.
P. Wait: When event is 'created' or 'updated', is `setStatus('pendente')` set for 'updated' path? The 'updated' path only sets updatedAt. If the event was already 'pendente', still pending. OK. If event has status pendente but was, say, previously sent partially? Fine.
Q. What about an event in status 'pendente' but belonging to a previous different offboarding? Finding #4 partially covers the overwrite but not about multiple offboardings. Actually #3 covers the search not anchored to current offboarding. But then #4 covers overwriting pending draft. Consider a worker re-hired, with previous S-2299 'pendente'? A pendente event would be from the current or old draft. Hmm. Might be same worker with a prior S-2299 event already transmitted (not pendente). #3 covers that.
Now, one additional real concern not in confirmed: In the migration seed data, the automation config structure uses triggerType 'on_enter' stored in a column named `trigger_type`, and the YAML mapping says the trigger id 'employee_enters_stage' has type 'on_enter'. But wait, in YAML triggers: notifications group: employee_enters_stage type on_enter. Movement group: offboarding_completed type on_offboarding_complete; all_activities_completed type on_all_activities_complete. So DB trigger_type values on_enter/on_all_activities_complete/on_offboarding_complete match trigger YAML types. Good.
Now actions: seeded actionType 'send_email_flow_responsible' — YAML has send_email_flow_responsible type 'send_email', with id 'send_email_flow_responsible'... Wait — In YAML: `- id: "send_email_flow_responsible"; type: "send_email"`. So the automation "type" is 'send_email' and the id 'send_email_flow_responsible' is something else (the automation action identifier?). Actually in this YAML structure each action has both an `id` and a `type`. The DB `action_type` likely stores the 'type' value, i.e., 'send_email', 'notification', 'stage_change', 'create_esocial_s2299_draft'. But the migration seed uses actionType 'send_email_flow_responsible' for the "Notificar responsável do fluxo" email automation. Hmm wait — which one is stored in DB for flow_automations.action_type? The service dispatch map keys include 'send_email'? Let's check the execution service action map to see what action_type values are used and whether 'send_email_flow_responsible' is a recognized action type.
Actually in the seed automation name: 'Notificar responsável do fluxo', trigger on_enter, actionType 'send_email_flow_responsible', actionConfig: to flow_responsible + template offboarding_stage_enter. Hmm — if action_type were 'send_email', the label & dispatch would be generic. Let me look at how existing DB rows and other migrations set these columns. We need a source of truth: find migrations that seed flow_automations with action_type values. Let's search the migrations directory for INSERT INTO flow_automations.
Also check the AutomationExecutionService action dispatch map — find the switch/map where keys include 'send_email'? Let me search the dispatch map in the file, e.g., "public function executeAutomation" near line 480-520. Let me read around 480-560.
Also the seeds in migration stage 2 use actionType 'stage_change' with name 'Avançar ao concluir 100% das atividades', triggerType 'on_all_activities_complete', actionConfig [] — YAML move_to_next_stage type stage_change. So using action_type 'stage_change' matches YAML 'type'.
Stage 3 automation "Criar Processo Seletivo ao concluir offboarding" actionType 'create_processo_seletivo'. Check YAML for 'create_processo_seletivo' entries. Let me search yaml file lines beyond 260.
And "Criar rascunho..." actionType 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' matches new YAML type.
So only 'send_email_flow_responsible' looks inconsistent if DB action_type stores YAML type 'send_email'. But wait maybe there are other flow automation action types in the dispatch like 'send_email_flow_responsible'? Let me check the dispatch map. Let me search the service for keys 'send_email' or 'send_email_flow_responsible' near the dispatch.
Let me search in service file for "'send_email" etc. There is likely a big switch mapping. Let me read lines around 480-560 (the dispatch array start). We saw lines 502-506 in diff: `'advance_rule' => ...`, `'create_processo_seletivo' => ...`, `'create_esocial_s2299_draft' => ...`. So this map includes keys that are action types. Let me find 'send_email_flow_responsible' in this map.
Let me read around 440-600.
Also search migrations for INSERT INTO flow_automations in the migrations directory to compare how prior seeds store action_type, trigger_type, conditions, actions and config, to verify this new migration matches the schema.
Let me do several searches:
- code_search "INSERT INTO flow_automations" across *.php
- file_read 440-600 of the service
- code_search "send_email_flow_responsible"
- code_search "'send_email' =>"
Let me batch.
Tool Calls (3)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 620, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 440}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15468)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 440-620
440|
441| // ✅ RE-ENABLED: Needed for fixed stage automations (approved/rejected/classified)
442| 'send_email_responsible' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'responsible'], $config), $member, $context),
443| 'send_email_manager' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'manager'], $config), $member, $context),
444| 'send_email_company_member' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'company_member'], $config), $member, $context),
445| 'send_email_role' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'role'], $config), $member, $context),
446|
447| // PDI email types
448| 'send_email_member' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'member'], $config), $member, $context),
449| 'send_email_direct_manager' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'direct_manager'], $config), $member, $context),
450| 'send_email_goal_responsible' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'goal_responsible'], $config), $member, $context),
451| // PDI alert types (same as email but with alert tone)
452| 'send_alert' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['notification_type' => 'alert'], $config), $member, $context),
453| 'send_alert_member' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'member', 'notification_type' => 'alert'], $config), $member, $context),
454| 'send_alert_direct_manager' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'direct_manager', 'notification_type' => 'alert'], $config), $member, $context),
455| 'send_alert_goal_responsible' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'goal_responsible', 'notification_type' => 'alert'], $config), $member, $context),
456| 'notify_employee' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'employee'], $config), $member, $context),
457| 'notify_responsible' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'responsible'], $config), $member, $context),
458| 'notify_flow_responsible' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'flow_responsible'], $config), $member, $context),
459| 'notify_esocial_worker_data' => $this->executeNotifyEsocialWorkerData($config, $member, $context),
460| 'notify_manager' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'manager'], $config), $member, $context),
461| 'notify_administrators' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'administrators'], $config), $member, $context),
462| // Training-specific notify actions (YAML id used as type by the UI)
463| 'notify_training_responsible' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'training_group_responsible'], $config), $member, $context),
464| 'notify_participant' => $this->executeNotify(array_merge(['to' => 'member'], $config), $member, $context),
465| // CRM notify actions (yaml types and legacy ids)
466| 'crm_action_notify_owner', 'crm_notify_record_owner' => $this->executeNotify($this->buildCrmNotifyConfig('record_owner', $config, $context), $member, $context),
467| 'crm_action_notify_board', 'crm_notify_board_owner' => $this->executeNotify($this->buildCrmNotifyConfig('board_owner', $config, $context), $member, $context),
468| 'notify', 'notification', 'send_notification' => $this->executeNotify($config, $member, $context),
469| 'bpm_notification', 'send_bpm_notification',
470| 'payroll_notify_flow_responsible', 'esocial_notify_flow_responsible' => $this->executeBpmNotification($config, $member, $context),
471| 'request_notification',
472| 'payroll_request_approval', 'esocial_request_approval' => $this->executeRequestNotification($config, $member, $context),
473| 'send_structural_research_invite' => $this->executeStructuralResearchInviteAction($config, $member, $context),
474| // NPS com IA: solicitação com aprovação/rejeição via executeRequestNotification (guia REQUEST_NOTIFICATION_IMPLEMENTATION_GUIDE.md)
475| 'nps_action_send_request_notification' => $this->executeRequestNotification(
476| $this->normalizeCrmStyledRequestNotificationForBpm($config, $member),
477| $member,
478| $context
479| ),
480| // CRM: na etapa NPS usa o mesmo pipeline; nas etapas CRM mantém envio legado via CrmAutomationService
481| 'crm_action_send_request_notification' => $this->executeCrmOrNpsRequestNotificationAction($config, $member, $context),
482|
483| // Outros tipos de ação
484| 'send_whatsapp' => $this->executeSendWhatsApp($config, $member, $context),
485| 'move_to_stage',
486| 'payroll_move_to_stage', 'esocial_move_to_stage' => $this->executeMoveToStage($config, $member, $context),
487| 'advance_to_next_stage', 'stage_change', 'move_to_next_stage',
488| 'payroll_move_to_next_stage', 'esocial_move_to_next_stage' => $this->shouldSkipAssessmentStageChange($context)
489| ? ['executed' => false, 'skipped' => true, 'reason' => 'assessment_already_responded_in_period']
490| : $this->executeAdvanceToNextStage($config, $member, $context),
491| 'update_status' => $this->executeUpdateStatus($config, $member, $context),
492| // ✅ Aliases for approve/reject - map to update_status with appropriate status
493| 'approve_candidate', 'approve' => $this->executeUpdateStatus(array_merge($config, ['status' => 'classified']), $member, $context),
494| 'classify_candidate', 'classify' => $this->executeUpdateStatus(array_merge($config, ['status' => 'classified']), $member, $context),
495| 'reject_candidate', 'reject' => $this->executeUpdateStatus(array_merge($config, ['status' => 'rejected']), $member, $context),
496| 'create_task' => $this->executeCreateTask($config, $member, $context),
497| 'schedule_interview' => $this->executeScheduleInterview($config, $member, $context),
498| 'assign_user' => $this->executeAssignUser($config, $member, $context),
499| 'add_tag' => $this->executeAddTag($config, $member, $context),
500| 'webhook' => $this->executeWebhook($config, $member, $context),
501| 'complete_flowable_task' => $this->executeCompleteFlowableTask($config, $member, $context),
502| // ✅ Advance rule action - treated as advance_to_next_stage
503| 'advance_rule' => $this->executeAdvanceToNextStage($config, $member, $context),
504| // ✅ Criar Processo Seletivo a partir de offboarding concluído
505| 'create_processo_seletivo' => $this->executeCreateProcessoSeletivo($config, $member, $context),
506| 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' => $this->executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft($config, $member, $context),
507|
508| // ✅ Visibilidade e Acesso - Offboarding
509| 'delay_offboarding_visibility' => $this->executeDelayOffboardingVisibility($config, $member, $context),
510| 'delay_platform_access_removal' => $this->executeDelayPlatformAccessRemoval($config, $member, $context),
511|
512| // ✅ PDI: Atribuir responsável à meta
513| 'assign_responsible', 'assign_goal_responsible' => $this->executeAssignGoalResponsible($config, $member, $context),
514|
515| // ✅ PDI: Movimentar sem solicitação (mesmo destino que Enviar solicitação, executa direto)
516| 'direct_movement',
517| 'assign_to_other_bpmn_flow_direct' => $this->executeDirectMovement($config, $member, $context),
518|
519| // ✅ Ciclos: iniciar todos os produtos associados à etapa do orquestrador
520| 'start_stage_products' => $this->executeStartStageProducts($config, $member, $context),
521| 'payroll_generate_monthly_sheet' => $this->executePayrollGenerateMonthlySheet($config, $member, $context, 'monthly'),
522| 'payroll_generate_weekly_sheet' => $this->executePayrollGenerateMonthlySheet($config, $member, $context, 'weekly'),
523| 'payroll_generate_biweekly_sheet' => $this->executePayrollGenerateMonthlySheet($config, $member, $context, 'biweekly'),
524| 'financial_flow_action' => $this->executeFinancialFlowAction($config, $member, $context),
525| 'esocial_validate_payroll_events' => $this->executeEsocialValidatePayrollEvents($config, $member, $context),
526| 'esocial_send_payroll_events' => $this->executeEsocialSendPayrollEvents($config, $member, $context),
527| 'esocial_check_payroll_response' => $this->executeEsocialCheckPayrollResponse($config, $member, $context),
528| // ✅ Jornada Metahuman: clona um novo ciclo ao entrar em Análise Jornada
529| 'jornada_clone_cycle' => $this->executeJornadaCloneCycle($config, $member, $context),
530|
531| // NPS Convite: notificações — default plain e-mail (evita slug auto inexistente no banco)
532| 'nps_action_notify_owner' => $this->executeNotify($this->mergeNpsNotifyRecipientConfig('record_owner', $config, $context), $member, $context),
533| 'nps_action_notify_admin' => $this->executeNotify($this->mergeNpsNotifyRecipientConfig('administrators', $config, $context), $member, $context),
534|
535| // NPS Convite: envia convite da pesquisa para o contato do registro CRM no fluxo
536| 'nps_action_send_invite' => $this->executeNpsSendInvite($config, $member, $context),
537| 'nps_action_move_to_evaluation' => $this->executeNpsKanbanMove(NpsBpmnService::STAGE_AVALIACAO, $config, $member, $context),
538| 'nps_action_move_to_not_authorized' => $this->executeNpsKanbanMove(NpsBpmnService::STAGE_NAO_AUTORIZADO, $config, $member, $context),
539| // NPS Avaliação: após X tempo, notificar follow-up de oportunidade (CRM) + opcional solicitação de novo registro
540| 'nps_action_evaluation_contact_followup' => $this->executeNpsEvaluationContactFollowup($config, $member, $context),
541|
542| default => ['executed' => false, 'message' => 'Tipo de ação desconhecido: ' . $type]
543| };
544| }
545|
546| /**
547| * @param array<string, mixed> $config
548| * @param array<string, mixed> $context
549| *
550| * @return array<string, mixed>
551| */
552| private function executeFinancialFlowAction(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member = null, array $context = []): array
553| {
554| if (!$this->financialFlowAutomationExecutor instanceof FinancialFlowAutomationExecutor) {
555| return [
556| 'executed' => false,
557| 'success' => false,
558| 'message' => 'Executor de automações financeiras indisponível.',
559| ];
560| }
561|
562| $result = $this->financialFlowAutomationExecutor->executeFinancialFlowAction($config, $member, $context);
563|
564| return array_merge([
565| 'executed' => true,
566| ], $result);
567| }
568|
569| private function executeEsocialValidatePayrollEvents(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member = null, array $context = []): array
570| {
571| if (!$member instanceof FlowInstanceMember || !$member->getFlowInstance() instanceof FlowInstance) {
572| return ['executed' => false, 'success' => false, 'message' => 'Automação eSocial sem instância de folha vinculada.'];
573| }
574|
575| $flowInstance = $member->getFlowInstance();
576| $company = $flowInstance->getCompany();
577| if (!$company instanceof Company) {
578| return ['executed' => false, 'success' => false, 'message' => 'Empresa da instância não encontrada.'];
579| }
580|
581| $competence = $this->resolvePayrollCompetenceFromFlow($flowInstance, $member);
582| if ($competence === null) {
583| $notification = $this->notifyEsocialResponsible(
584| $member,
585| $context,
586| 'Competência eSocial não encontrada',
587| 'Não foi possível identificar a competência da folha nesta instância. Revise os dados da competência antes de validar o eSocial.',
588| 'erro'
589| );
590|
591| return [
592| 'executed' => false,
593| 'success' => false,
594| 'message' => 'Competência da folha não encontrada na instância do orquestrador.',
595| 'notification' => $notification,
596| ];
597| }
598|
599| [$year, $month, $paymentDate] = $competence;
600| $payrolls = $this->findPayrollsForEsocialValidation($company, $year, $month, $paymentDate);
601| $validation = $this->buildPayrollEsocialAutomationValidation($company, $payrolls, $year, $month, $paymentDate, false);
602|
603| $metadata = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? [];
604| if (!is_array($metadata)) {
605| $metadata = [];
606| }
607| $metadata['esocialValidation'] = $validation;
608| $metadata['esocialValidationCheckedAt'] = (new \DateTimeImmutable())->format('c');
609| $member->setSourceMetadata($metadata);
610|
611| $flowConfig = $flowInstance->getConfig() ?? [];
612| if (!is_array($flowConfig)) {
613| $flowConfig = [];
614| }
615| $flowConfig['esocialValidation'] = $validation;
616| $flowConfig['esocialValidationCheckedAt'] = (new \DateTimeImmutable())->format('c');
617| $flowInstance->setConfig($flowConfig);
618|
619| $this->entityManager->persist($member);
620| $this->entityManager->persist($flowInstance);
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "INSERT INTO flow_automations", "file_patterns": ["migrations/*.php"]}
Result
File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php Match lines: 3 758| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index) 766| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index) 781| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index) File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php Match lines: 1 428| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, fixed_stage_type, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "send_email_flow_responsible"}
Result
File: .docs/NOTIFICACOES_MULTIPLOS_CANAIS.md Match lines: 3 24|- `send_email_flow_responsible` → Email + Chat (Onboarding/Offboarding) 607|| `send_email_flow_responsible` | Responsável do Fluxo | Email + Chat | 618|| `send_email_flow_responsible` | Responsável do Fluxo | Email + Chat | File: config/automations/offboarding.yaml Match lines: 1 156| - id: "send_email_flow_responsible" File: config/automations/onboarding.yaml Match lines: 1 138| - id: "send_email_flow_responsible" File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php Match lines: 1 264| 'actionType' => 'send_email_flow_responsible', File: src/Controller/DecisionSystemController.php Match lines: 2 5493| 'actionType' => 'send_email_flow_responsible', 5569| 'actionType' => 'send_email_flow_responsible', File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 1 439| 'send_email_flow_responsible' => $this->executeSendEmail(array_merge(['to' => 'flow_responsible'], $config), $member, $context), File: src/Service/WorkflowOrchestratorBuiltinStages.php Match lines: 2 516| 'actionType' => 'send_email_flow_responsible', 592| 'actionType' => 'send_email_flow_responsible', File: templates/decision_system/automations/new_automation.html.twig Match lines: 2 7682| actionId = 'send_email_flow_responsible'; 8197| 'send_email_flow_responsible': 'send_email', File: templates/governance/cases/automations/new_automation.html.twig Match lines: 2 5232| actionId = 'send_email_flow_responsible'; 5672| 'send_email_flow_responsible': 'send_email',
Request #35
deepseek-v4-flash
P:53.94K C:368 CR:49.41K CW:0
3223ms
Reasoning
Great. The service dispatch map includes 'send_email_flow_responsible' as an action type mapping to executeSendEmail with to flow_responsible. So migration's use of action_type 'send_email_flow_responsible' is valid (the map key exists). Also used in DecisionSystemController at 5493/5569 and WorkflowOrchestratorBuiltinStages — so consistent with existing seeds of default flows. Good, not an issue.
Now let me compare to existing seed migration Version20260518151423.php lines 740-810 to see the exact INSERT structure and ensure the new migration matches (columns, JSON structures of conditions/actions).
Let me read that migration segment.
Tool Calls (3)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 800, "file_path": "migrations/Version20260518151423.php", "start_line": 700}
Result
File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php (Total lines: 1558)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 700-800
700| string $anchorDate
701| ): void {
702| $cycles = count($phaseDays);
703| $stages = [];
704| $orderIndex = 0;
705|
706| for ($phase = 1; $phase <= $cycles; $phase++) {
707| $phaseIdx = $phase - 1;
708| $days = (int) ($phaseDays[$phaseIdx] ?? 30);
709| $startOn = $phaseStartDates[$phaseIdx] ?? $anchorDate;
710| $advanceOn = $phaseAdvanceOnDates[$phaseIdx] ?? $anchorDate;
711|
712| $stages[] = [
713| 'name' => "Fase {$phase} em Andamento",
714| 'desc' => "Produtos iniciam em {$startOn} e avançam após {$days} dias. Fim do bloco: {$advanceOn}.",
715| 'cat' => 'andamento', 'phase' => $phase, 'order' => $orderIndex++,
716| 'adv' => ['auto_advance' => true, 'conditions' => [
717| ['type' => 'time_elapsed', 'days' => $days, 'enabled' => true, 'default' => true],
718| ['type' => 'products_completion', 'percentage' => 100, 'enabled' => false, 'default' => false],
719| ]],
720| ];
721| $stages[] = [
722| 'name' => "Análise Periódica Fase {$phase}",
723| 'desc' => "Análise estruturada da Fase {$phase}.",
724| 'cat' => 'feedback_1on1', 'phase' => $phase, 'order' => $orderIndex++, 'adv' => [],
725| ];
726| }
727| $stages[] = [
728| 'name' => 'Análise Jornada',
729| 'desc' => 'Etapa final da jornada para consolidação dos resultados.',
730| 'cat' => 'analise_jornada', 'phase' => null, 'order' => $orderIndex, 'adv' => [],
731| ];
732|
733| $stageIds = [];
734| foreach ($stages as $s) {
735| $this->connection->executeStatement(
736| 'INSERT INTO flow_stages (flow_template_id, product_id, name, description, order_index, advance_rules, stage_category, phase_number)
737| VALUES (:t, NULL, :name, :desc, :o, :adv, :cat, :phase)',
738| ['t' => $templateId, 'name' => $s['name'], 'desc' => $s['desc'], 'o' => $s['order'],
739| 'adv' => json_encode($s['adv'], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE), 'cat' => $s['cat'], 'phase' => $s['phase']]
740| );
741| $stageIds[$s['cat']][(string) ($s['phase'] ?? 'final')] = (int) $this->connection->lastInsertId();
742| }
743|
744| $products = array_values($workflowProductSlugs);
745| foreach ($stages as $s) {
746| $sid = $stageIds[$s['cat']][(string) ($s['phase'] ?? 'final')] ?? null;
747| if (!$sid) {
748| continue;
749| }
750|
751| if ($s['cat'] === 'andamento') {
752| $phaseIdx = max(0, (int) $s['phase'] - 1);
753| $scheduledDate = $phaseStartDates[$phaseIdx] ?? $anchorDate;
754| $daysInStage = (int) ($phaseDays[$phaseIdx] ?? 30);
755| $prods = $this->resolveProductsForPhase($journeyCode, (int) $s['phase'], $products);
756|
757| $this->connection->executeStatement(
758| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index)
759| VALUES (:sid, NULL, :name, \'on_scheduled_date\', \'start_stage_products\', :acfg, :cond, :acts, 1, 0)',
760| ['sid' => $sid, 'name' => 'Na data de início da fase no calendário — iniciar produtos da etapa',
761| 'acfg' => json_encode(['products' => $prods], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
762| 'cond' => json_encode([$this->buildScheduledCondition($scheduledDate)], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
763| 'acts' => json_encode([['type' => 'start_stage_products', 'config' => ['products' => $prods], 'orderIndex' => 0]], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE)]
764| );
765| $this->connection->executeStatement(
766| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index)
767| VALUES (:sid, NULL, :name, \'on_days_in_stage\', \'move_to_next_stage\', \'[]\', :cond, :acts, 1, 1)',
768| ['sid' => $sid, 'name' => 'Após tempo na etapa — mover para próxima etapa',
769| 'cond' => json_encode([['type' => 'on_days_in_stage', 'config' => ['days' => $daysInStage, 'value' => $daysInStage, 'count_from_first_entry' => true], 'orderIndex' => 0]], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
770| 'acts' => json_encode([['type' => 'move_to_next_stage', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0]], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE)]
771| );
772| }
773|
774| if ($s['cat'] === 'feedback_1on1') {
775| $cfg = ['to' => 'direct_manager', 'recipient_type' => 'direct_manager', 'request_type' => 'cycle_feedback_decision',
776| 'title' => 'Decisão da Jornada Metahuman após a análise periódica',
777| 'message' => 'A unidade {{member_name}} concluiu uma etapa de análise periódica da Jornada Metahuman. Escolha o encaminhamento.',
778| 'approve_button_text' => 'Voltar para a fase atual', 'reject_button_text' => 'Avançar para a próxima fase',
779| 'template' => 'bpm-request_notification'];
780| $this->connection->executeStatement(
781| 'INSERT INTO flow_automations (flow_stage_id, flow_template_id, name, trigger_type, action_type, action_config, conditions, actions, is_active, order_index)
782| VALUES (:sid, NULL, :name, \'on_enter\', \'request_notification\', :acfg, :cond, :acts, 1, 0)',
783| ['sid' => $sid, 'name' => 'Solicitar decisão do gestor direto após a análise periódica',
784| 'acfg' => json_encode($cfg, JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
785| 'cond' => json_encode([['type' => 'on_enter', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0]], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE),
786| 'acts' => json_encode([['type' => 'request_notification', 'config' => $cfg, 'orderIndex' => 0]], JSON_UNESCAPED_UNICODE)]
787| );
788| }
789| }
790| }
791|
792| // -------------------------------------------------------------------------
793| // 9. FLOW INSTANCES (plan seed — 1 per template per company)
794| // -------------------------------------------------------------------------
795|
796| private function seedFlowInstances(): void
797| {
798| // Instances are now seeded inline inside seedJornadaMetahumanTemplates().
799| // This method is kept for backward-compat / standalone call on existing DBs.
800| $codes = ['J1', 'J2', 'J3', 'J4', 'J5', 'J6', 'J7', 'J8', 'J9', 'J10'];
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "private function findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember"}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 1 15421| private function findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember(FlowInstanceMember $member): ?\App\Entity\OffboardingMember
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "private function getOrCreateAssistantConversation"}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 1 14113| private function getOrCreateAssistantConversation(\App\Entity\User $user): ?\App\Entity\ChatConversation
Request #36
deepseek-v4-flash
P:56.45K C:261 CR:54.27K CW:0
2487ms
Reasoning
Migration seeding format consistent with existing seeds.
Now I should verify entity setters/getters exist, particularly for EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento. Let me find the entity and repository for EsocialDadosRemuneracao::findByTrabalhador, and entity EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento to confirm the setters used. Also confirm OffboardingMember methods: getDismissalDate, getRequestedAt, getReason, getCompanyMember, getOffboarding; Offboarding getOffboardingFlowResponsible. And FlowInstanceMember getSourceType, getFlowResponsible etc.
Let me find the entity files.
Tool Calls (3)
file_find
Show Details
Arguments
{"query_name": "EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento"}
Result
src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
file_find
Show Details
Arguments
{"query_name": "OffboardingMember.php"}
Result
src/Entity/OffboardingMember.php
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "function findByTrabalhador"}
Result
File: src/Repository/EsocialDadosRemuneracaoRepository.php Match lines: 2 504| public function findByTrabalhador($esocialTrabalhadorId): ?EsocialDadosRemuneracao 665| public function findByTrabalhadorArray($trabalhador): array File: src/Repository/EsocialS1210EvtPgtosRepository.php Match lines: 1 432| public function findByTrabalhador($trabalhador) File: src/Repository/EsocialS2190EvtAdmPrelimRepository.php Match lines: 1 79| public function findByTrabalhador($trabalhador): ?EsocialS2190EvtAdmPrelim File: src/Repository/EsocialS2200EvtAdmissaoRepository.php Match lines: 1 79| public function findByTrabalhador($trabalhador): ?EsocialS2200EvtAdmissao File: src/Repository/EsocialS2205EvtAltCadastralRepository.php Match lines: 1 70| public function findByTrabalhador($trabalhador): ?EsocialS2205EvtAltCadastral File: src/Repository/EsocialS2206EvtAltContratualRepository.php Match lines: 1 74| public function findByTrabalhador($trabalhador): ?EsocialS2206EvtAltContratual
Request #37
deepseek-v4-flash
P:57.12K C:361 CR:56.7K CW:0
2831ms
Reasoning
Let me check the entity EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento to confirm the setters exist, and OffboardingMember getters. Read the entity classes (search for the setter methods). I'll grep the entity file for "function set".
Let me read EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php. And OffboardingMember.php getters. And the repository findByTrabalhador signature to see if it accepts entity or id.
Tool Calls (3)
file_read
Failed
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 120, "file_path": "src/Repository/EsocialDadosRemuneracaoRepository.php", "start_line": 490}
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php"], "search_text": "public function set"}
Result
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php Match lines: 19 115| public function setDadosRemuneracao(?EsocialDadosRemuneracao $dadosRemuneracao): self 127| public function setEsocialTrabalhador(?EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador): void 137| public function setMtvDeslig(?string $mtvDeslig): self 149| public function setDtDeslig(?\DateTimeInterface $dtDeslig): self 161| public function setDtAvPrv(?\DateTimeInterface $dtAvPrv): self 173| public function setIndPagtoApi(?string $indPagtoApi): self 185| public function setDtProjFimApi(?\DateTimeInterface $dtProjFimApi): self 197| public function setPensAlim(?int $pensAlim): self 209| public function setPercAliment(?int $percAliment): self 221| public function setVrAlim(?int $vrAlim): self 233| public function setNrProcTrab(?string $nrProcTrab): self 245| public function setIndPdv(?string $indPdv): self 257| public function setCpfSubstituto(?string $cpfSubstituto): self 269| public function setDtNascto(?\DateTimeInterface $dtNascto): self 281| public function setNovoCpf(?string $novoCpf): self 293| public function setIndRemun(?int $indRemun): self 305| public function setDtFimRemun(?\DateTimeInterface $dtFimRemun): self 317| public function setInsConsig(?string $insConsig): self 329| public function setNrContr(?string $nrContr): self
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Entity/OffboardingMember.php"], "search_text": "public function getDismissalDate|public function getRequestedAt|public function getReason|public function getCompanyMember|public function getOffboarding", "use_perl_regexp": true}
Result
File: src/Entity/OffboardingMember.php Match lines: 5 226| public function getOffboarding(): ?Offboarding 237| public function getCompanyMember(): ?CompanyMembers 270| public function getRequestedAt(): ?\DateTimeInterface 281| public function getReason(): ?string 380| public function getDismissalDate(): ?\DateTimeInterface
Request #38
deepseek-v4-flash
P:58.05K C:360 CR:57.47K CW:0
3278ms
Reasoning
Interesting: setPercAliment(?int) and setVrAlim(?int) — so the entity property type is int, but the DB column was flagged in confirmed finding #6 as decimal(10,2). Wait, the confirmed finding says the column in the DB is decimal(10,2). Let me check the entity property type and column mapping. If the entity setter expects ?int and the mapping is decimal, then PHP would pass int. This finding #6 already flagged conversion discarding decimals. Not repeated.
The repository read failed due to incorrect range; but the earlier search shows findByTrabalhador at line 504. It accepts `$esocialTrabalhadorId`. Does it accept an entity or an id? In executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft, they pass `$esocialTrabalhador` (entity). Let me read the method to see.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 540, "file_path": "src/Repository/EsocialDadosRemuneracaoRepository.php", "start_line": 500}
Result
File: src/Repository/EsocialDadosRemuneracaoRepository.php (Total lines: 741)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 500-540
500|
501| return $this->saveDadosRemuneracao($data, $company, $companyMember, $esocialDadosTrabalhador);
502| }
503|
504| public function findByTrabalhador($esocialTrabalhadorId): ?EsocialDadosRemuneracao
505| {
506| return $this->createQueryBuilder('e')
507| ->andWhere('e.esocialTrabalhador = :esocialTrabalhadorId')
508| ->setParameter('esocialTrabalhadorId', $esocialTrabalhadorId)
509| ->orderBy('e.id', 'DESC')
510| ->setMaxResults(1)
511| ->getQuery()
512| ->getOneOrNullResult();
513| }
514|
515| /**
516| * Extrai todos os dados da remuneração eSocial para formatação no FlowableVariablesService
517| *
518| * @param int $remuneracaoId ID da remuneração (EsocialDadosRemuneracao)
519| * @return array|null Dados estruturados da remuneração e relacionamentos, ou null se não encontrado
520| */
521| public function getFlowableDataForTemplate(int $remuneracaoId): ?array
522| {
523| $remuneracao = $this->find($remuneracaoId);
524|
525| if (!$remuneracao) {
526| return null;
527| }
528|
529| // Extrair dados principais da remuneração
530| $data = [
531| 'id' => $remuneracao->getId(),
532| 'indMv' => $remuneracao->getIndMv(),
533| 'tpInscRemunOutrEmpr' => $remuneracao->getTpInscRemunOutrEmpr() ?? [],
534| 'nmTrab' => $remuneracao->getNmTrab(),
535| 'dtNascto' => $remuneracao->getDtNascto()?->format('Y-m-d'),
536| 'tpInscSucessaoVinc' => $remuneracao->getTpInscSucessaoVinc(),
537| 'nrInscSucessaoVinc' => $remuneracao->getNrInscSucessaoVinc(),
538| 'matricAnt' => $remuneracao->getMatricAnt(),
539| 'dtAdm' => $remuneracao->getDtAdm()?->format('Y-m-d'),
540| 'observacaoSucessaoVinc' => $remuneracao->getObservacaoSucessaoVinc(),
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 240, "file_path": "src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php", "start_line": 100}
Result
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php (Total lines: 335)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 100-240
100| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=40, nullable=true)
101| */
102| private $nrContr;
103|
104| /**
105| * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity=EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class, )
106| * @ORM\JoinColumn(nullable=false)
107| */
108| private $dadosRemuneracao;
109|
110| public function getDadosRemuneracao(): ?EsocialDadosRemuneracao
111| {
112| return $this->dadosRemuneracao;
113| }
114|
115| public function setDadosRemuneracao(?EsocialDadosRemuneracao $dadosRemuneracao): self
116| {
117| $this->dadosRemuneracao = $dadosRemuneracao;
118|
119| return $this;
120| }
121|
122| public function getEsocialTrabalhador()
123| {
124| return $this->esocialTrabalhador;
125| }
126|
127| public function setEsocialTrabalhador(?EsocialDadosTrabalhador $esocialTrabalhador): void
128| {
129| $this->esocialTrabalhador = $esocialTrabalhador;
130| }
131|
132| public function getMtvDeslig(): ?string
133| {
134| return $this->mtvDeslig;
135| }
136|
137| public function setMtvDeslig(?string $mtvDeslig): self
138| {
139| $this->mtvDeslig = $mtvDeslig;
140|
141| return $this;
142| }
143|
144| public function getDtDeslig(): ?\DateTimeInterface
145| {
146| return $this->dtDeslig;
147| }
148|
149| public function setDtDeslig(?\DateTimeInterface $dtDeslig): self
150| {
151| $this->dtDeslig = $dtDeslig;
152|
153| return $this;
154| }
155|
156| public function getDtAvPrv(): ?\DateTimeInterface
157| {
158| return $this->dtAvPrv;
159| }
160|
161| public function setDtAvPrv(?\DateTimeInterface $dtAvPrv): self
162| {
163| $this->dtAvPrv = $dtAvPrv;
164|
165| return $this;
166| }
167|
168| public function getIndPagtoApi(): ?string
169| {
170| return $this->indPagtoApi;
171| }
172|
173| public function setIndPagtoApi(?string $indPagtoApi): self
174| {
175| $this->indPagtoApi = $indPagtoApi;
176|
177| return $this;
178| }
179|
180| public function getDtProjFimApi(): ?\DateTimeInterface
181| {
182| return $this->dtProjFimApi;
183| }
184|
185| public function setDtProjFimApi(?\DateTimeInterface $dtProjFimApi): self
186| {
187| $this->dtProjFimApi = $dtProjFimApi;
188|
189| return $this;
190| }
191|
192| public function getPensAlim(): ?int
193| {
194| return $this->pensAlim;
195| }
196|
197| public function setPensAlim(?int $pensAlim): self
198| {
199| $this->pensAlim = $pensAlim;
200|
201| return $this;
202| }
203|
204| public function getPercAliment(): ?int
205| {
206| return $this->percAliment;
207| }
208|
209| public function setPercAliment(?int $percAliment): self
210| {
211| $this->percAliment = $percAliment;
212|
213| return $this;
214| }
215|
216| public function getVrAlim(): ?int
217| {
218| return $this->vrAlim;
219| }
220|
221| public function setVrAlim(?int $vrAlim): self
222| {
223| $this->vrAlim = $vrAlim;
224|
225| return $this;
226| }
227|
228| public function getNrProcTrab(): ?string
229| {
230| return $this->nrProcTrab;
231| }
232|
233| public function setNrProcTrab(?string $nrProcTrab): self
234| {
235| $this->nrProcTrab = $nrProcTrab;
236|
237| return $this;
238| }
239|
240| public function getIndPdv(): ?string
Request #39
deepseek-v4-flash
P:60.28K C:4.96K CR:58.37K CW:0
34423ms
Reasoning
Entity setters exist. Repository findByTrabalhador uses entity comparison in QueryBuilder, which accepts an entity object — fine.
Now, need to check EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento columns: dadosRemuneracao is ManyToOne with nullable=false — in the missing-data path, no event created so OK. But when event created with `setDadosRemuneracao($remuneracao)` OK.
Now check columns company, modo, tpAmb, etc. Let me check the top of entity: check `getStatus()` method and mapping of status; but fine.
Now deeper: any other real issues? Let me examine the change at lines 7039-7044 in executeNotify: it now passes 'system_sender' into emailConfig → executeSendEmail → chat path with `sendChatNotification($user, $subject, $chatBody, $member, $recipientType, $config)` at line 13832 — config here is emailConfig which contains system_sender. Let me verify that path from executeSendEmail eventually passes config through sendChatForRecipientType. Not strictly necessary; the flow seems coherent.
Now is there any risk with `system_sender => null` default and `filter_var(null ?? false)` fine.
Potential regression: Previously `$isPayrollSystemSender` only for payroll source type. Now `$isSystemSender` is true whenever `$config['system_sender']` is true. Since executeNotify merges config into recipientContext but not into emailConfig previously. Now emailConfig carries system_sender. But what about other calls to sendChatNotification where $config includes user input? Config values come from automation config (DB). A malicious config could set system_sender=true to make chat messages appear as Adriana (system) rather than from the manager. That is an internal config, not directly user input per se — automation builders could set it. This is by design (the YAML feature). It could be used to spoof "Adriana"? Since automations are configured by company admins, it's not a strong security issue.
Now check: In sendChatNotification, when system_sender true, they send message to the assistant conversation without being an employee/company member. For the S-2299 flow, this matches requirement.
Now possible real bug: In `executeNotify`'s in-app notification, the recipient user for 'to' => 'company_member' + company_member_id is the responsible. But there's also the `$member` — the member whose companyMember is the leaving employee. Actually, wait — 'to' => 'company_member' with company_member_id -> responsible. resolveRecipients uses recipientContext that includes $config (merged) so company_member_id available. Let's confirm resolveRecipients handles 'company_member'. It's presumably used elsewhere with 'to' => 'company_member' plus company_member_id. In executeNotifyEsocialWorkerData, they use to 'flow_responsible'. Hmm. Search for "'company_member'" resolution to verify that company_member_id is read. Let me search resolveRecipients method for company_member_id.
Also check: if `$responsible->getUser()` is null (CompanyMembers might not have a linked user). CompanyMembers presumably links to user. Let me not go too deep.
Bigger issues possibly in migration: Let me examine the migration's data more carefully with focus on integrity:
1. `up()` iterates `company` table but reads `company` rows — ensures product and workflow per company. For big tenant bases could be heavy — confirmed finding #2.
2. `ensureStage` uniqueness by (flow_template_id, product_id, name). The seeded names are per-template. But if the same template existed previously with other default stages (created by previous seed of "Fluxos de Saída" default), this migration would attach extra stages 'Etapa 1 - Preparação' etc. Wait, the flow_templates created by ensureTemplate have seed_migration = this seed key. So ensureStage only runs on templates created by this migration (idempotent rerun). Good.
3. However, there might already exist a default offboarding template with the same stage names created via template_category or other seeds? But those wouldn't match the seed_migration query, so ensureTemplate would create a new template. Two templates with same name? Existing default offboarding templates likely have their own settings seed keys, so new template would be created, resulting in duplicate default templates for offboarding. But maybe acceptable since template_category 'offboarding_esocial' distinguishes.
Let's check: In down(), delete automations and activities by flow_stages whose flow_template_id = templateId. flow_stages.flow_template_id column exists? Yes, ensureStage query uses flow_template_id. Good.
4. Potential integrity issue in `down()` with activities: The DELETE of `flow_activities` joins through flow_stages. But `flow_activities` may reference `flow_stage_id`. OK.
5. down() does not delete `workflow_products` and workflows created if workflow didn't previously exist. Already finding #1 covers workflows? #1 says "o rollback não remove os workflows/workflow_products". Yes already covered.
6. down() also doesn't delete the products created if missing (find #2 partly covers products active). OK.
7. In up(): It uses `return` (not continue) when a table is missing. If a later table is missing in the middle of the list (e.g., `flow_automations` doesn't exist in fresh DB), the migration silently returns success without creating anything. Then idempotency: after the schema is migrated later? Well, migrations run sequentially with schema versions, so if flow_automations exists (added by earlier migration), fine. A missing table would mean schema outdated — silently succeeding could be misleading but probably not a real issue in practice.
8. Another subtle issue in `ensureActivity` and `ensureAutomation`: uses name equality without product scoping... but stage is already tied to product.
9. The stage name queries with LOWER(name) = LOWER(:name) require index; no big deal.
10. Potential real issue: ensureOffboardingStages assigns to every stage an activity named 'Offboarding' (activity_type 'activity'). This means each template stage has an 'Offboarding' activity. And the automation triggers 'on_all_activities_complete' requires 100% of activities in stage. Fine.
11. Migration: the seed of "Etapa 2 - Transição" with automation on_all_activities_complete action stage_change. Stage 3 automation on_offboarding_complete → create_processo_seletivo; on_enter → create_esocial_s2299_draft. But note the seeded automation for stage 3 on_enter uses actionConfig that includes `to: flow_responsible` and `_default_automation_id`. However when it runs, executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft resolves the responsible from config responsible_id etc. The config has no responsible_id, so resolution falls back to flowResponsible. Good.
12. Wait — the final stage automation action create_esocial_s2299_draft triggers on entering the stage (on_enter). But YAML says allowed_triggers only 'employee_enters_stage' (on_enter). Good.
13. However, this means the draft S-2299 is created when the member ENTERS the final stage — before offboarding actually completes. That is described in requirements (Etapa final dispara...). Fine.
14. Potential data issue: In up(), `ensureWorkflow` may create a new workflow with `is_default = 1` when the company has no 'fluxo-de-saida' workflow. But company may already have offboarding workflows with different slugs (e.g. translated name) as default. Inserting a second default workflow could shift what is shown as default in the operations orchestrator. But we lack evidence. Hmm.
Actually careful: Let me check the meaning of `is_default` in workflows; multiple default workflows might break assumptions. It's speculative.
Let me now think about important actual issues that might be real, that are not already confirmed:
A. **Unused import / typed `setEsocialTrabalhador` etc.** Not issues.
B. **The event created always `setIndRetif(1)`** meaning "original" (indRetif 1 = original event) and `setModo('INC')`. If a previous S-2299 was already transmitted for this worker (status not pendente), then on a rehire/2nd termination, they would create a new event for the same trabalhador without considering the previous one's reference — this may need `indRetif=2` (rectification) or a new initial event is fine (each dismissal is a separate event occurrence keyed by data). Since event keyed by worker + dtDeslig... eSocial id_eventh = tpInsc + nrInsc + dtDeslig + mtvDeslig? The identity of S-2299 event is by (nrInsc, dtDeslig, mtvDeslig, cpf). If a new termination date differs, new event. So it's fine. But finding #3 raised that when previous not pendente, this method returns existing_not_editable and never creates new event for a re-termination — that's the finding.
C. **The response logic returns success true even when eventStatus == 'updated' but actually event not persisted?** On 'updated' path they set updatedAt and persist. OK.
D. **Potential missing scenario: 'created' event never flushed if an exception after persist before flush.** The try/catch returns error, no flush → event not saved. But the metadata set earlier was persisted with flush at 15033 before? Actually sequence: persist event (15008), then metadata set and flush (15033) — flush persists event. If any exception in between (e.g., building URL via router generate), the event not flushed; fine.
E. **Date fields `dataTerminoAviso` set to `DtProjFimApi`** — Actually "dataTerminoAviso" maps to setDtProjFimApi, which seems semantically intended (projected end of aviso prévio). fine.
F. **`avisoPrevioIndenizado` maps to indPagtoApi (bool S/N)** — but avisoPrevioIndenizado might be a boolean, and indPagtoApi means payment form for aviso. Hmm — S-2299 has indPagtoAPI (1–7...) indicating form of payment of the aviso prévio; it's not a simple boolean S/N. Using booleanStringOrNull converting to S/N would produce invalid data for the eSocial layout where the field expects numeric values (1 = indenizado, 2 = trabalhado etc.). Wait but this is only a draft config; the field name in config is 'avisoPrevioIndenizado' a boolean. eSocial "indPagtoAPI" in S-2299: Indicativo de pagamento do aviso prévio: 1 - indenizado, 2 - trabalhado, etc. Actually the field codes: 1 – Indenizado; 2 – Trabalhado; 3 – Trabalhado e Indenizado; ... etc. Not S/N. So setting S/N is wrong for official eSocial, but the value in the payload is also S/N; later, when a human reviews the draft maybe a converter handles. Since it's a draft pre-fill, questionable but may not be blocking. Could flag? Since official field semantics mismatch, but the draft is meant for review... Might be worth noting as a low/medium? But no evidence how the UI saves S-2299 (indPagtoApi stored as string S/N). Let me check the entity field indPagtoApi — string. And other parts of code that write indPagtoApi (the guides) to see expected values. Let me search "indPagtoApi" in code.
Actually I should focus: the review already has 7 confirmed findings. I need to avoid duplicates and report new real issues. Let me ensure what remains are genuinely new, real, high-confidence issues.
Let me think about a real bug in the code:
**Bug candidate:** `executeNotify` is called with `$member` (FlowInstanceMember). Inside `executeNotify` the chat path for system_sender only triggers when an email is sent via executeSendEmail (because chat is sent via executeSendEmail). Wait, actually executeNotify only triggers chat via executeSendEmail when templateSlug or body exists. Since message_html is provided, emailTemplateBody is set, so executeSendEmail called. In executeSendEmail's chat integration, presumably if the recipient resolved has no email, the chat may still be sent via `sendChatForRecipientType`. But system_sender passes through emailConfig into chat config. OK.
But hold on: executeNotify's in-app NotificationSpecialist is created for the user. Then executeSendEmail to user email... The notification buttonUrl is '/chat?adriana=1'. So the user will see in-app notification with the Adriana chat. Good.
But do they want to send an EMAIL? The requirement says "notificação" as Adriana. Actually they might send email too. Fine.
**Bug candidate:** The link inserted into message_html is the reviewUrl (the raw URL). But message_html will go through executeNotify-> replaceVariables(message_html) then executeSendEmail. If templateSlug is null and only message_html present, does executeSendEmail send plain HTML email? It will because emailTemplateBody is messageHtml. But wait — if templateSlug is null, executeSendEmail might derive an auto email template based on recipient type and member (skip_auto_email_template not set). It might try to find a DB template `offboarding-on_enter-flow_responsible` etc. Actually sendEmail path may auto-derive template slug from recipient_type and action context; here config has template null. In executeNotify, emailConfig has template => null (emailConfig['template'] = $templateSlug). Hmm but there's a comment about auto-email template: if not skip, "Template determinado automaticamente baseado em: trigger + destinatário". In executeSendEmail, when template null, they may compute auto template slug from the member/product/recipientType; if missing from DB, skip email but still chat.
Given requirement says chat with Adriana, it's fine.
**Now check the migration stages seeding of automation conditions for on_enter triggers uses 'conditions' array with on_enter type, and 'actions' with type 'send_email' for stage 1... wait**, In stage 1 automation they used:
- actionType 'send_email_flow_responsible'
- actionConfig: ['to' => 'flow_responsible', 'template' => 'offboarding_stage_enter']
- conditions: [['type' => 'on_enter', ...]]
- actions: [['type' => 'send_email', 'config' => ['to' => 'flow_responsible', 'template' => 'offboarding_stage_enter'], 'orderIndex' => 0]]
Hmm the action in the `actions` array is 'send_email' while the top-level action_type is 'send_email_flow_responsible'. In the older migration (Version20260518151423) they stored action 'type' inside actions equal to the action_type ('request_notification', 'start_stage_products', 'move_to_next_stage'). In new migration stage 1, they set `actions[0]['type'] = 'send_email'` while `action_type = 'send_email_flow_responsible'`. Does that mismatch matter? The `actions` array is used by the flow editor UI to render the action list when editing the automation (each action element type may need to be resolvable in the UI config, e.g., new_automation templates look up actionType 'send_email_flow_responsible' as id). Let's check how the editor reads `action_type` vs `actions[].type`. In DecisionSystemController, they load automations and display action label by action_type probably (map in flow_detail & list_automations). In stage 3 new automation they consistently set actions[0]['type'] = 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' matching action_type. In stage 1 they used actions[0]['type'] = 'send_email'. This inconsistency inside the same migration suggests stage 1's actions[0] type could be a copy-paste inconsistency. But does the mismatch break the UI? Need to determine how `actions` JSON is consumed. If only `action_type` is used for execution and labels, and `actions`/`conditions` are for display/editing in the UI. The UI mapping includes both 'send_email' and 'send_email_flow_responsible' as valid labels? In list_automations.html.twig, getActionLabel maps 'send_email' => ? Let's check. And new_automation maps 'send_email_flow_responsible': 'send_email' type mapping. It likely is fine to have either.
Given the constraints (precision over recall), I won't report this as definite.
Now let me inspect the stage 1 automation more: name 'Notificar responsável do fluxo' with trigger on_enter actionType send_email_flow_responsible and config to flow_responsible template offboarding_stage_enter. This e-mail template 'offboarding_stage_enter' probably exists as a DB email template. Not sure; but it's used in other seeds (DecisionSystemController line 5493/5569). Let me not dig.
Let me now focus on finding truly new issues.
**Issue candidate: The offboarding YAML placed the new action under `movement` category** — the actions group is "movement", but create_esocial_s2299_draft is not a movement; but other seeds (create_processo_seletivo) may also be in movement. Actually 'create_processo_seletivo' isn't present in this YAML? Let me search within offboarding.yaml. Wait, we saw earlier lines of the file up to 260 and there are sections. The YAML appears to be used to populate automation config choices in the orchestrator's flow editor. Adding the new action under `movement` matters for grouping in the UI. Let me check the YAML categories: notifications, movement, visibility, maybe more. Let me search for "create_processo_seletivo" in yaml.
Wait, is the yaml even read by the backend? Or used by front template `new_automation` JS maps? The new_automation.html.twig has its own JS map for actions. YAML is config for the UI maybe loaded via API. Whatever; not central.
**Issue candidate (migration):** The migration's `ensureOffboardingStages` names every stage's single activity 'Offboarding'. On stage "Etapa 3 - Finalização", there's an automation `on_offboarding_complete` for create_processo_seletivo — but offboarding complete requires all activities completed; there's 1 activity. And a stage_change automation also on the same stage? Wait, stage 2 automation triggers on_all_activities_complete → move to stage 3. Stage 3 triggers on_enter for create_esocial_s2299_draft and on_offboarding_complete for create_processo_seletivo. Hmm: When is `on_offboarding_complete` evaluated? When the member concludes the last stage. OK.
Note that stage 3 on_enter trigger creates the S-2299 draft each time a member enters final stage. If the member moves forward to final stage multiple times? Kanban movement to later stages might not re-trigger on_enter if already in that stage; fine.
**Issue candidate: In the YAML new entry, `config_preset: to: flow_responsible`, but the action itself has `has_config: false`.** Compare with similar entries in YAML (send_email_flow_responsible also has has_config false + config_preset to flow_responsible). So consistent.
Now, are there misspellings in YAML keys for the new block? Keys: id, type, title, icon, has_config, allowed_triggers, blocked_triggers, blocked_trigger_message, description, config_preset. These match other entries (delay_offboarding_visibility also uses allowed_triggers/blocked_triggers). Good.
**Issue candidate:** `blocked_triggers` includes the new action's allowed trigger? It lists offboarding_completed, exit_date, deadline_reached, all_activities_completed, all_activities_completed_plus_days, any_activity_completed, days_in_stage, days_after_offboarding_start — no employee_enters_stage. Good.
Now let's consider `AutomationExecutionService` details again for new real bugs.
**Bug: `$company->getEsocialMode() === null` check.** Then later `setTpAmb($company->getEsocialMode() ?? '2')`. Fine.
**Bug: idempotency when triggered multiple times** — Each time the member enters the final stage (e.g., action runs again), 'updated' status overwrites metadata. Fine.
**Bug: notify duplicates.** If the automation runs twice (e.g., stage re-entered), the responsible gets notified twice. But on_enter triggers only once per entry into the stage. Unless entry happens more than once. Probably OK.
**Potential real bug (new): the in-app notification / email subject uses the same title "Revisar desligamento eSocial (S-2299)" for each user; if the responsible is also the offboarding employee?** not likely.
**Bug: metadata audit — payload includes '_offboarding' reason etc. OK.
**New issue candidate: The code at 15043-15053 notifies via executeNotify with config 'to' => 'company_member'. resolveRecipients('company_member', $member, $recipientContext).** But $member here is the FlowInstanceMember of the *leaving employee*. recipientType 'company_member' resolution may use member->getCompanyMember() (i.e., the leaving employee) unless company_member_id in context overrides. They pass company_member_id => responsible id in config, and the recipientContext merges $config. So resolveRecipients should use company_member_id to find the responsible. Let me verify resolveRecipients handles company_member_id.
Let me read the resolveRecipients method.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "private function resolveRecipients"}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 1 12928| private function resolveRecipients(string $recipientType, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "'company_member_id'"}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 7
2390| 'company_member_id' => $member->getCompanyMember()?->getId(),
4738| 'company_member_id' => (int) ($payload['company_member_id'] ?? 0),
10318| $responsibleId = $config['responsible_id'] ?? $config['responsibleId'] ?? $config['company_member_id'] ?? null;
13099| if (isset($context['company_member_id'])) {
13100| $companyMemberId = $context['company_member_id'];
15045| 'company_member_id' => (string) $responsible->getId(),
15085| ?? $config['company_member_id']
Request #40
deepseek-v4-flash
P:65.47K C:118 CR:60.16K CW:0
2118ms
Reasoning
Let me read resolveRecipients around 12928-13160 to confirm company_member resolution using context['company_member_id'].
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 13130, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 12928}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15468)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 12928-13130
12928| private function resolveRecipients(string $recipientType, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
12929| {
12930| $users = [];
12931|
12932| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] recipientType: {$recipientType}, member: " . ($member ? $member->getId() : 'NULL'));
12933|
12934| switch ($recipientType) {
12935| case 'candidate':
12936| case 'member':
12937| case 'employee':
12938| case 'collaborator':
12939| // Candidato / Colaborador (processo seletivo, onboarding, offboarding)
12940| if ($member) {
12941| if ($member->getUser()) {
12942| $users[] = $member->getUser();
12943| }
12944| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found candidate/member/employee: " . ($member->getUser()?->getEmail() ?? $member->getCompanyMember()?->getEmail() ?? 'sem-email'));
12945| }
12946| break;
12947|
12948| case 'record_owner':
12949| if ($member) {
12950| $emails = $this->getCrmRecordOwnerEmails($member);
12951| $emails = is_array($emails) ? $emails : (empty($emails) ? [] : [$emails]);
12952| foreach ($emails as $email) {
12953| $email = trim((string) $email);
12954| if ($email === '') {
12955| continue;
12956| }
12957| $user = $this->entityManager->getRepository(User::class)->findOneBy(['email' => $email]);
12958| if ($user) {
12959| $users[] = $user;
12960| }
12961| }
12962| }
12963| break;
12964|
12965| case 'board_owner':
12966| if ($member) {
12967| $emails = $this->getCrmBoardOwnerEmails($member);
12968| $emails = is_array($emails) ? $emails : (empty($emails) ? [] : [$emails]);
12969| foreach ($emails as $email) {
12970| $email = trim((string) $email);
12971| if ($email === '') {
12972| continue;
12973| }
12974| $user = $this->entityManager->getRepository(User::class)->findOneBy(['email' => $email]);
12975| if ($user) {
12976| $users[] = $user;
12977| }
12978| }
12979| }
12980| break;
12981|
12982| case 'responsible':
12983| // Buscar responsável por produto
12984| if ($member) {
12985| $sourceType = $member->getSourceType();
12986| $sourceId = $member->getSourceId();
12987|
12988| if ($sourceType === 'process' && $sourceId) {
12989| // Processo seletivo: Process.responsible
12990| $process = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\Process::class)
12991| ->find($sourceId);
12992|
12993| if ($process) {
12994| $responsible = $process->getResponsible();
12995| if ($responsible) {
12996| $users[] = $responsible;
12997| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found responsible from Process: " . $responsible->getEmail());
12998| } else {
12999| error_log("⚠️ [resolveRecipients] Process {$process->getId()} não tem responsável definido!");
13000| }
13001| }
13002| } elseif (in_array($sourceType, ['training_participant', 'training_group'], true)) {
13003| // Treinamentos: responsáveis do grupo de treinamento (Process.responsible + responsibles)
13004| $meta = $member->getSourceMetadata() ?? [];
13005| $trainingProcessId = (int) ($meta['processId'] ?? $sourceId ?? 0);
13006| if ($trainingProcessId > 0) {
13007| $trainingProcess = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\Process::class)->find($trainingProcessId);
13008| if ($trainingProcess) {
13009| $seen = [];
13010| $primary = $trainingProcess->getResponsible();
13011| if ($primary) {
13012| $seen[$primary->getId()] = true;
13013| $users[] = $primary;
13014| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found training responsible (primary): " . $primary->getEmail());
13015| }
13016| foreach ($trainingProcess->getResponsibles() as $resp) {
13017| if (!isset($seen[$resp->getId()])) {
13018| $seen[$resp->getId()] = true;
13019| $users[] = $resp;
13020| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found training responsible (extra): " . $resp->getEmail());
13021| }
13022| }
13023| if (empty($users)) {
13024| error_log("⚠️ [resolveRecipients] responsible/training: nenhum responsável no Process #{$trainingProcessId}");
13025| }
13026| }
13027| }
13028| } elseif ($sourceType === 'offboarding' && $sourceId) {
13029| // Offboarding: buscar ROLE_MANAGER da empresa
13030| $responsibleEmail = $this->getResponsibleEmail($member);
13031| if ($responsibleEmail) {
13032| $emails = is_array($responsibleEmail) ? $responsibleEmail : [$responsibleEmail];
13033| foreach ($emails as $email) {
13034| $user = $this->entityManager->getRepository(User::class)->findOneBy(['email' => $email]);
13035| if ($user) {
13036| $users[] = $user;
13037| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found responsible for offboarding: " . $user->getEmail());
13038| }
13039| }
13040| }
13041| } elseif ($sourceType === 'onboarding' && $sourceId) {
13042| // Onboarding: buscar ROLE_MANAGER da empresa
13043| $responsibleEmail = $this->getResponsibleEmail($member);
13044| if ($responsibleEmail) {
13045| $emails = is_array($responsibleEmail) ? $responsibleEmail : [$responsibleEmail];
13046| foreach ($emails as $email) {
13047| $user = $this->entityManager->getRepository(User::class)->findOneBy(['email' => $email]);
13048| if ($user) {
13049| $users[] = $user;
13050| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found responsible for onboarding: " . $user->getEmail());
13051| }
13052| }
13053| }
13054| } else {
13055| error_log("⚠️ [resolveRecipients] Member não está vinculado a um produto conhecido (sourceType: " . ($member->getSourceType() ?? 'NULL') . ")");
13056| }
13057| }
13058| break;
13059|
13060| case 'flow_responsible':
13061| // Buscar responsável do fluxo por produto
13062| if ($member) {
13063| $flowRespEmail = $this->getFlowResponsibleEmail($member);
13064| if ($flowRespEmail) {
13065| $emails = is_array($flowRespEmail) ? $flowRespEmail : [$flowRespEmail];
13066| foreach ($emails as $email) {
13067| $user = $this->entityManager->getRepository(User::class)->findOneBy(['email' => $email]);
13068| if ($user) {
13069| $users[] = $user;
13070| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found flow_responsible: " . $user->getEmail());
13071| }
13072| }
13073| }
13074| }
13075| break;
13076|
13077| case 'interviewer':
13078| // Buscar entrevistador do processo seletivo
13079| if ($member && $member->getSourceType() === 'process' && $member->getSourceId()) {
13080| $process = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\Process::class)
13081| ->find($member->getSourceId());
13082|
13083| if ($process && $process->getInterviewer()) {
13084| $users[] = $process->getInterviewer();
13085| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found interviewer: " . $process->getInterviewer()->getEmail());
13086| }
13087| }
13088| break;
13089|
13090| case 'monitored_evaluator':
13091| // Buscar avaliador monitorado
13092| // TODO: Implementar lógica específica se necessário
13093| error_log("⚠️ [resolveRecipients] monitored_evaluator ainda não implementado");
13094| break;
13095|
13096| case 'company_member':
13097| // Buscar membro específico da empresa pelo ID na config.
13098| // Fallback: quando não houver ID explícito, usar o próprio membro do fluxo.
13099| if (isset($context['company_member_id'])) {
13100| $companyMemberId = $context['company_member_id'];
13101| $companyMember = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\CompanyMembers::class)
13102| ->find($companyMemberId);
13103|
13104| if ($companyMember && $companyMember->getUser()) {
13105| $users[] = $companyMember->getUser();
13106| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Found company_member: " . $companyMember->getUser()->getEmail());
13107| }
13108| } elseif ($member) {
13109| if ($member->getUser()) {
13110| $users[] = $member->getUser();
13111| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Fallback company_member via FlowInstanceMember->getUser(): " . $member->getUser()->getEmail());
13112| } elseif ($member->getCompanyMember() && $member->getCompanyMember()->getUser()) {
13113| $users[] = $member->getCompanyMember()->getUser();
13114| error_log("🔍 [resolveRecipients] Fallback company_member via FlowInstanceMember->getCompanyMember(): " . $member->getCompanyMember()->getUser()->getEmail());
13115| }
13116| }
13117| break;
13118|
13119| case 'manager':
13120| // Apenas gestores por permissão canEdit/teamLimitation dos produtos alvo (sem fallback para administradores/ROLE_MANAGER)
13121| if ($member) {
13122| $permissionProducts = $this->resolveManagerPermissionProductSlugs($member, $context);
13123| $users = $this->resolveManagersByProductPermissions($member, $permissionProducts);
13124| if (empty($users)) {
13125| error_log("⚠️ [resolveRecipients] Manager não encontrado para member {$member->getId()} (nenhum usuário com permissão canEdit nos produtos)");
13126| }
13127| }
13128| break;
13129|
13130| case 'direct_manager':
Request #41
deepseek-v4-flash
P:68.42K C:1.55K CR:65.54K CW:0
13186ms
Reasoning
resolveRecipients 'company_member' uses context['company_member_id'], which is present since config merged into recipientContext. Good.
Now let me check `resolveEsocialS2299Responsible` handles the case where configuredId refers to a CompanyMembers from another company (already confirmed finding #5).
Now think about **execution of the automation from a different company member**: `executeNotify` with 'to' => 'company_member' + company_member_id... but the user for responsible - if the responsible is `CompanyMembers`, get user from it. If the responsible is the flow responsible of the instance, ok. But there's a subtle issue: `NotificationSpecialist` has user FK, created with $user = companyMember.getUser(). If responsible has no user (e.g., company member without account), no user, but they still record event.
OK.
Now — find new issues. Let's revisit the migration file for other real problems:
1. In `ensureTemplate()` and other ensure methods, when idempotency checks run, they update or no-op. In `up()`, on second run (rerun of a previously-run migration doesn't happen, migrations table prevents). But if they manually re-run in partial state.
2. The `down()` uses SQL with JOIN deletes. For flow_automations deletes by flow_stages where flow_template_id = :templateId. For flow_activities same. But in flow_stages inserted with product_id = offboardingProductId. Deleting activities and automations for those stages. However, consider if re-running up() after a partial run: existing stages, but the automations already existed. ensureAutomation checks by (flow_stage_id, name, trigger_type, action_type) so would skip. Good.
3. Now consider ensureOffboardingStages — if a stage already exists with same name but created from an earlier partial run before activities/automations seeds, they will still add activities/automations (activity check by name and stage; automation check by stage+name+trigger+action). Good idempotent.
4. **Real issue candidate**: up() creates the activity 'Offboarding' in EACH stage with `offboarding_activity_type_id` null and `onboarding_activity_type_id` null. Activities in flow templates normally need `flow_activity_type` or similar to map to product-specific activities for instantiation. Wait — is an offboarding activity expected to reference an `offboarding_activity_type_id` (predefined types like "devolução de equipamentos")? If activity_type is generic 'activity' with null type ids, when instantiating the flow into offboarding member activities, does it create real tasks? This level is beyond our diff; can't confirm without deeper knowledge. Skip.
5. **Potential real issue**: `ensureActivity` only checks name and creates one activity for stage; if a previous partial run added an activity with the same name but different type, skip. Fine.
6. What about data for `flow_template_products.template_type`? 'fixo' value — check existing seeds. Search for "template_type" in migrations to see allowed values ('fixo','variavel','automatico'?).
Let me search for existing template_type values and 'slot_index' usage.
Actually, the more interesting areas to report new findings:
A. **The `executeNotify` route in the S-2299 action has `message_html` containing raw URL inside inline HTML, and also NotificationSpecialist message is plain with text "Abra o chat com a Adriana".** Fine.
B. **Duplicate event when the automation re-runs on a stage re-entry while a 'pendente' draft from the same member already exists and has been reviewed (with corrections typed by the responsible)** — covered by #4.
C. **create event even when `dadosRemuneracao` exists but `$esocialTrabalhador` has no CPF?** not relevant.
D. **`onlyDigits` on null?** They pass `(string) $company->getCnpj()`. OK.
E. **`findLatestEsocialS2299Event` ordering by id DESC, but S-2299 events relate to `esocialTrabalhador`; a new termination draft would always find the previous transmitted event and never create new draft** — #3 covers.
F. **Event creation lacks `setTpInsc`/`nrInsc` of the worker? not present in entity.
G. **Migration: `ensureWorkflow` is not scoped by whether the company already has the product or uses offboarding; plus creates flow even when eSocial disabled for company.** #2 partially covers seeding for all tenants.
H. **Migration 'up' seed creates template category 'offboarding_esocial' and modules config, but does not check `esocial` availability per company**. #2 covers general.
I. **Template seeded with automation on_enter of final stage creating S-2299; but the automation triggers regardless of whether the member's company member has eSocial worker data; the draft-only handling deals with it. That's intended.
J. **In the code, `$eventStatus = 'draft_only'` is default when data missing; and they return message about data pending. In `$missing` etc.
K. **Now real logic issue: When the automation runs and `$eventStatus === 'updated'`, it sets only updatedAt and then `applyEsocialS2299Payload` overwrites fields with mostly empty payload (config empty), wiping any values the responsible had previously entered into the draft** — #4 covers wiping of previously reviewed event (pendente). Good.
L. **Actually possible NEW finding: when `$eventStatus === 'updated'` or 'created', they do NOT set status back to 'pendente' for 'updated' path if previous status was e.g., 'pendente' — yes it was pendente. Fine.
M. **New finding candidate: when payload `dataDesligamento` empty (no dismissal date & requestedAt null) and event is created new, `dtDeslig` null, they persist a S-2299 with required fields empty. That's a draft; OK.
N. **Bug candidate in `booleanStringOrNull`:** Config might contain string 'avisoPrevioIndenizado' => '1' or 'true'. They map to 'S'/'N' but the entity `indPagtoApi` expects the eSocial code? Let me check how indPagtoApi is normally stored by eSocial UI. Search "indPagtoApi" in code.
Tool Calls (3)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "indPagtoApi"}
Result
File: docs/Flowable/Tasks/formatters/esocial_s2299_campos_disponiveis.md
Match lines: 6
29|| `indPagtoApi` | string | Indicador de pagamento de aviso prévio indenizado (S/N) | Não | "S" |
218|| `indPagtoApi` | string | global | Indicador de pagamento de aviso prévio indenizado |
305|- `{{indPagtoApi}}` - Quando indicador de pagamento de aviso prévio indenizado não disponível
353|3. **Aviso Prévio**: Os campos relacionados ao aviso prévio (`dtAvPrv`, `indPagtoApi`, `dtProjFimApi`) são importantes para documentar se o aviso prévio foi trabalhado ou indenizado.
400|22. **Aviso Prévio Indenizado**: Quando `indPagtoApi` é "S", significa que o aviso prévio foi indenizado (pago em dinheiro) ao invés de trabalhado.
427|// - indPagtoApi: "S"
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php
Match lines: 5
37| private $indPagtoApi;
168| public function getIndPagtoApi(): ?string
170| return $this->indPagtoApi;
173| public function setIndPagtoApi(?string $indPagtoApi): self
175| $this->indPagtoApi = $indPagtoApi;
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php
Match lines: 2
78| $event->setIndPagtoApi($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N');
119| 'indPagtoApi' => $event->getIndPagtoApi(),
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php
Match lines: 1
15161| $event->setIndPagtoApi($this->booleanStringOrNull($payload['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ?? null));
File: src/Service/ESocialDataService.php
Match lines: 1
1075| $std->indpagtoapi = $evento->getIndPagtoAPI();
File: src/Service/FlowableServices/FlowableVariablesService.php
Match lines: 1
15205| $this->formatter->formatString('indPagtoApi', $eventData['indPagtoApi'] ?? '{{indPagtoApi}}', 'global'),
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/jsonSchemes/v_S_01_00_00/evtDeslig.schema
Match lines: 1
53| "indpagtoapi": {
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/jsonSchemes/v_S_01_01_00/evtDeslig.schema
Match lines: 1
53| "indpagtoapi": {
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/jsonSchemes/v_S_01_02_00/evtDeslig.schema
Match lines: 1
53| "indpagtoapi": {
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_00_00/evtDeslig.xsd
Match lines: 2
73| <xs:element name="indPagtoAPI" type="TS_sim_nao">
81| <xs:documentation>Validação: Obrigatório se {indPagtoAPI}(./indPagtoAPI) for igual a [S], devendo ser igual ou posterior a {dtDeslig}(./dtDeslig).</xs:documentation>
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_01_00/evtDeslig.xsd
Match lines: 2
75| <xs:element name="indPagtoAPI" type="TS_sim_nao">
83| <xs:documentation>Validação: Obrigatório se {indPagtoAPI}(./indPagtoAPI) for igual a [S], devendo ser igual ou posterior a {dtDeslig}(./dtDeslig).</xs:documentation>
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_02_00/evtDeslig.xsd
Match lines: 2
76| <xs:element name="indPagtoAPI" type="TS_sim_nao">
84| <xs:documentation>Validação: Obrigatório se {indPagtoAPI}(./indPagtoAPI) for igual a [S], devendo ser igual ou posterior a {dtDeslig}(./dtDeslig).</xs:documentation>
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/schemes/v_S_01_03_00/evtDeslig.xsd
Match lines: 2
76| <xs:element name="indPagtoAPI" type="TS_sim_nao">
84| <xs:documentation>Validação: Obrigatório se {indPagtoAPI}(./indPagtoAPI) for igual a [S], devendo ser igual ou posterior a {dtDeslig}(./dtDeslig).</xs:documentation>
File: src/libs/nfephp-org/sped-esocial/src/Factories/Traits/TraitS2299.php
Match lines: 8
88| "indPagtoAPI",
89| $this->std->indpagtoapi,
601| "indPagtoAPI",
602| $this->std->indpagtoapi,
1120| "indPagtoAPI",
1121| $this->std->indpagtoapi,
1651| "indPagtoAPI",
1652| $this->std->indpagtoapi,
File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_desligamento/aviso_previo.html.twig
Match lines: 2
26| {% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.indPagtoApi == 'S' %}
33| {% if prevEvts.desligamento and prevEvts.desligamento.indPagtoApi == 'N' %}
File: tests/ESocialS2299EventTest.php
Match lines: 1
67| $this->std->indpagtoapi = 'S';
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "setIndPagtoApi"}
Result
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php Match lines: 1 173| public function setIndPagtoApi(?string $indPagtoApi): self File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php Match lines: 1 78| $event->setIndPagtoApi($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N'); File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 1 15161| $event->setIndPagtoApi($this->booleanStringOrNull($payload['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ?? null));
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "getStatus()", "file_patterns": ["src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php"]}
Result
No matches found
Request #42
deepseek-v4-flash
P:71.59K C:338 CR:69.89K CW:0
3111ms
Reasoning
The indPagtoApi is indeed S/N, matching repository usage. Not an issue.
So `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento` likely does NOT have a `getStatus()` method in the entity? Wait, code calls `$latestEvent->getStatus()`. Search for 'status' property in the entity — code_search for getStatus in entity file returned no matches. That's significant: the entity may not have `status` field! Let me check the entity file top for `status` property.
The `findLatestEsocialS2299Event` check uses `$latestEvent->getStatus() !== 'pendente'`. If the entity has no getStatus method, this would cause an Error (call to undefined method). Let me read the whole entity file to see its fields.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 110, "file_path": "src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php", "start_line": 1}
Result
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php (Total lines: 335)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-110
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Entity;
4|
5|use App\Repository\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository;
6|use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
7|
8|/**
9| * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass=EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository::class)
10| */
11|class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento extends EsocialEvents
12|{
13| /**
14| * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="EsocialDadosTrabalhador")
15| * @ORM\JoinColumn(name="esocial_dados_trabalhador_id", referencedColumnName="id", nullable=false)
16| */
17| private $esocialTrabalhador;
18|
19| /**
20| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=2, nullable=true)
21| */
22| private $mtvDeslig;
23|
24| /**
25| * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
26| */
27| private $dtDeslig;
28|
29| /**
30| * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
31| */
32| private $dtAvPrv;
33|
34| /**
35| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=1, nullable=true)
36| */
37| private $indPagtoApi;
38|
39| /**
40| * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
41| */
42| private $dtProjFimApi;
43|
44| /**
45| * @ORM\Column(type="integer", nullable=true)
46| */
47| private $pensAlim;
48|
49| /**
50| * @ORM\Column(type="decimal", precision=10, scale=2, nullable=true)
51| */
52| private $percAliment;
53|
54| /**
55| * @ORM\Column(type="decimal", precision=10, scale=2, nullable=true)
56| */
57| private $vrAlim;
58|
59| /**
60| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=20, nullable=true)
61| */
62| private $nrProcTrab;
63|
64| /**
65| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=1, nullable=true)
66| */
67| private $indPdv;
68|
69| /**
70| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=11, nullable=true)
71| */
72| private $cpfSubstituto;
73|
74| /**
75| * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
76| */
77| private $dtNascto;
78|
79| /**
80| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=11, nullable=true)
81| */
82| private $novoCpf;
83|
84| /**
85| * @ORM\Column(type="integer", nullable=true)
86| */
87| private $indRemun;
88|
89| /**
90| * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
91| */
92| private $dtFimRemun;
93|
94| /**
95| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=5, nullable=true)
96| */
97| private $insConsig;
98|
99| /**
100| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=40, nullable=true)
101| */
102| private $nrContr;
103|
104| /**
105| * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity=EsocialDadosRemuneracao::class, )
106| * @ORM\JoinColumn(nullable=false)
107| */
108| private $dadosRemuneracao;
109|
110| public function getDadosRemuneracao(): ?EsocialDadosRemuneracao
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 335, "file_path": "src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php", "start_line": 240}
Result
File: src/Entity/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento.php (Total lines: 335)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 240-335
240| public function getIndPdv(): ?string
241| {
242| return $this->indPdv;
243| }
244|
245| public function setIndPdv(?string $indPdv): self
246| {
247| $this->indPdv = $indPdv;
248|
249| return $this;
250| }
251|
252| public function getCpfSubstituto(): ?string
253| {
254| return $this->cpfSubstituto;
255| }
256|
257| public function setCpfSubstituto(?string $cpfSubstituto): self
258| {
259| $this->cpfSubstituto = $cpfSubstituto;
260|
261| return $this;
262| }
263|
264| public function getDtNascto(): ?\DateTimeInterface
265| {
266| return $this->dtNascto;
267| }
268|
269| public function setDtNascto(?\DateTimeInterface $dtNascto): self
270| {
271| $this->dtNascto = $dtNascto;
272|
273| return $this;
274| }
275|
276| public function getNovoCpf(): ?string
277| {
278| return $this->novoCpf;
279| }
280|
281| public function setNovoCpf(?string $novoCpf): self
282| {
283| $this->novoCpf = $novoCpf;
284|
285| return $this;
286| }
287|
288| public function getIndRemun(): ?int
289| {
290| return $this->indRemun;
291| }
292|
293| public function setIndRemun(?int $indRemun): self
294| {
295| $this->indRemun = $indRemun;
296|
297| return $this;
298| }
299|
300| public function getDtFimRemun(): ?\DateTimeInterface
301| {
302| return $this->dtFimRemun;
303| }
304|
305| public function setDtFimRemun(?\DateTimeInterface $dtFimRemun): self
306| {
307| $this->dtFimRemun = $dtFimRemun;
308|
309| return $this;
310| }
311|
312| public function getInsConsig(): ?string
313| {
314| return $this->insConsig;
315| }
316|
317| public function setInsConsig(?string $insConsig): self
318| {
319| $this->insConsig = $insConsig;
320|
321| return $this;
322| }
323|
324| public function getNrContr(): ?string
325| {
326| return $this->nrContr;
327| }
328|
329| public function setNrContr(?string $nrContr): self
330| {
331| $this->nrContr = $nrContr;
332|
333| return $this;
334| }
335|}
Request #43
deepseek-v4-flash
P:73.64K C:184 CR:71.81K CW:0
2378ms
Reasoning
The entity extends `EsocialEvents` — the `status` property and `getStatus`/`setStatus`, `getModo`/`setModo`, `getCompany`/`setCompany`, `setTpAmb`, `setTpInscTransmissor`, `setNrInscTransmissor`, `setIndRetif`, `setCreatedAt`, `setUpdatedAt` must come from the parent `EsocialEvents`. Let's verify the parent class has these setters/getters and the mapping of column names (e.g., esocial_events table). Also company relationship.
Let me look at EsocialEvents.
Tool Calls (1)
file_find
Show Details
Arguments
{"query_name": "EsocialEvents.php"}
Result
src/Entity/EsocialEvents.php
Request #44
deepseek-v4-flash
P:73.85K C:52 CR:73.73K CW:0
1778ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Entity/EsocialEvents.php"}
Result
File: src/Entity/EsocialEvents.php (Total lines: 357)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-357
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Entity;
4|
5|use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
6|use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\Column;
7|use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\GeneratedValue;
8|use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\Id;
9|use App\Entity\EsocialS1000EvtInfoEmpregador;
10|use App\Entity\EsocialS1005EvtTabEstab;
11|use App\Entity\EsocialS1020EvtTabLotacao;
12|use App\Entity\EsocialS1070EvtTabProcesso;
13|use App\Entity\EsocialS1010EvtTabRubrica;
14|use App\Entity\EsocialS1200EvtRemun;
15|use App\Entity\EsocialS1210EvtPgtos;
16|use App\Entity\EsocialS1280EvtInfoComplPer;
17|use App\Entity\EsocialS1298EvtReabreEvPer;
18|use App\Entity\EsocialS1299EvtFechaEvPer;
19|use App\Entity\EsocialS2190EvtAdmPrelim;
20|use App\Entity\EsocialS2200EvtAdmissao;
21|use App\Entity\EsocialS2205EvtAltCadastral;
22|use App\Entity\EsocialS2206EvtAltContratual;
23|use App\Entity\EsocialS2210EvtCAT;
24|use App\Entity\EsocialS2220EvtMonit;
25|use App\Entity\EsocialS2221EvtExmToxMot;
26|use App\Entity\EsocialS2230EvtAfastTemp;
27|use App\Entity\EsocialS2240EvtExpRisco;
28|use App\Entity\EsocialS2300EvtTsvInicio;
29|use App\Entity\EsocialS2306EvtTsvAltContr;
30|use App\Entity\EsocialS2298EvtReintegr;
31|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
32|use App\Entity\EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino;
33|use App\Entity\EsocialS2500EvtProcTrab;
34|use App\Entity\EsocialS2501EvtContProc;
35|use App\Entity\EsocialS3000EvtExclusao;
36|use App\Entity\EsocialS3500EvtExcProcTrab;
37|
38|/**
39| * @ORM\Entity
40| * @ORM\Table(name="esocial_events")
41| * @ORM\InheritanceType("JOINED")
42| * @ORM\DiscriminatorColumn(name="event_type", type="string")
43| * @ORM\DiscriminatorMap({
44| * "s1000" = "EsocialS1000EvtInfoEmpregador",
45| * "s1005" = "EsocialS1005EvtTabEstab",
46| * "s1020" = "EsocialS1020EvtTabLotacao",
47| * "s1070" = "EsocialS1070EvtTabProcesso",
48| * "s1010" = "EsocialS1010EvtTabRubrica",
49| * "s1200" = "EsocialS1200EvtRemun",
50| * "s1210" = "EsocialS1210EvtPgtos",
51| * "s1280" = "EsocialS1280EvtInfoComplPer",
52| * "s1298" = "EsocialS1298EvtReabreEvPer",
53| * "s1299" = "EsocialS1299EvtFechaEvPer",
54| * "s2190" = "EsocialS2190EvtAdmPrelim",
55| * "s2200" = "EsocialS2200EvtAdmissao",
56| * "s2205" = "EsocialS2205EvtAltCadastral",
57| * "s2206" = "EsocialS2206EvtAltContratual",
58| * "s2210" = "EsocialS2210EvtCAT",
59| * "s2220" = "EsocialS2220EvtMonit",
60| * "s2221" = "EsocialS2221EvtExmToxMot",
61| * "s2230" = "EsocialS2230EvtAfastTemp",
62| * "s2240" = "EsocialS2240EvtExpRisco",
63| * "s2300" = "EsocialS2300EvtTsvInicio",
64| * "s2306" = "EsocialS2306EvtTsvAltContr",
65| * "s2298" = "EsocialS2298EvtReintegr",
66| * "s2299" = "EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento",
67| * "s2399" = "EsocialS2399EvtTsvTermino",
68| * "s2500" = "EsocialS2500EvtProcTrab",
69| * "s2501" = "EsocialS2501EvtContProc",
70| * "s3000" = "EsocialS3000EvtExclusao",
71| * "s3500" = "EsocialS3500EvtExcProcTrab"
72| * })
73| */
74|abstract class EsocialEvents
75|{
76| /**
77| * @Id
78| * @GeneratedValue
79| * @Column(type="integer")
80| */
81| protected $id;
82|
83| /**
84| * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="Company")
85| * @ORM\JoinColumn(name="company_id", referencedColumnName="id", nullable=false)
86| */
87| protected $company;
88|
89| /**
90| * @ORM\Column(type="string", nullable=true)
91| */
92| private $modo;
93|
94| /**
95| * @ORM\Column(type="integer", nullable=true)
96| */
97| private $tpAmb;
98|
99| /**
100| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=36, nullable=true, unique=true)
101| */
102| private $uniqueEventId;
103|
104| /**
105| * @ORM\Column(type="integer", nullable=true)
106| */
107| private $tpInscTransmissor;
108|
109| /**
110| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=36, nullable=true)
111| */
112| private $nrInscTransmissor;
113|
114| /**
115| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=36, nullable=true)
116| */
117| private $iniValid;
118|
119| /**
120| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=36, nullable=true)
121| */
122| private $fimValid;
123|
124| /**
125| * @ORM\Column(type="integer", nullable=true)
126| */
127| private $indRetif;
128|
129| /**
130| * @ORM\Column(type="integer", nullable=true)
131| */
132| private $indApuracao;
133|
134| /**
135| * @ORM\Column(type="date", nullable=true)
136| */
137| private $perApur;
138|
139| /**
140| * @ORM\Column(type="integer", nullable=true)
141| */
142| private $indGuia;
143|
144| /**
145| * @ORM\Column(type="string", length=50)
146| */
147| private $status;
148|
149| /**
150| * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity=EsocialEventBatch::class, inversedBy="events")
151| * @ORM\JoinColumn(nullable=true)
152| */
153| private $batch;
154|
155| /**
156| * @ORM\OneToOne(targetEntity=EsocialEventResponse::class, mappedBy="event")
157| */
158| private $response;
159|
160| /**
161| * @Column(type="datetime_immutable")
162| */
163| protected $createdAt;
164|
165| /**
166| * @Column(type="datetime_immutable", nullable=true)
167| */
168| protected $updatedAt;
169|
170| public function __construct()
171| {
172| $this->createdAt = new \DateTimeImmutable();
173| $this->updatedAt = null;
174| }
175|
176| public function getId()
177| {
178| return $this->id;
179| }
180|
181| public function setId($id): void
182| {
183| $this->id = $id;
184| }
185|
186| public function getCompany()
187| {
188| return $this->company;
189| }
190|
191| public function setCompany($company): void
192| {
193| $this->company = $company;
194| }
195|
196| public function getModo()
197| {
198| return $this->modo;
199| }
200|
201| public function setModo($modo): void
202| {
203| $this->modo = $modo;
204| }
205|
206| public function getUniqueEventId()
207| {
208| return $this->uniqueEventId;
209| }
210|
211| public function setUniqueEventId(?string $uniqueEventId): void
212| {
213| $this->uniqueEventId = $uniqueEventId;
214| }
215|
216| public function getTpInscTransmissor()
217| {
218| return $this->tpInscTransmissor;
219| }
220|
221| public function setTpInscTransmissor($tpInscTransmissor): void
222| {
223| $this->tpInscTransmissor = $tpInscTransmissor;
224| }
225|
226| public function getNrInscTransmissor()
227| {
228| return $this->nrInscTransmissor;
229| }
230|
231| public function setNrInscTransmissor($nrInscTransmissor): void
232| {
233| $this->nrInscTransmissor = $nrInscTransmissor;
234| }
235|
236| public function getCreatedAt()
237| {
238| return $this->createdAt;
239| }
240|
241| public function setCreatedAt($createdAt): void
242| {
243| $this->createdAt = $createdAt;
244| }
245|
246| public function getUpdatedAt()
247| {
248| return $this->updatedAt;
249| }
250|
251| public function setUpdatedAt($updatedAt): void
252| {
253| $this->updatedAt = $updatedAt;
254| }
255|
256| public function getStatus()
257| {
258| return $this->status;
259| }
260|
261| public function setStatus($status): void
262| {
263| $this->status = $status;
264| }
265|
266| public function getTpAmb()
267| {
268| return $this->tpAmb;
269| }
270|
271| public function setTpAmb($tpAmb): void
272| {
273| $this->tpAmb = $tpAmb;
274| }
275|
276| public function getIniValid()
277| {
278| return $this->iniValid;
279| }
280|
281| public function setIniValid($iniValid): void
282| {
283| $this->iniValid = $iniValid;
284| }
285|
286| public function getFimValid()
287| {
288| return $this->fimValid;
289| }
290|
291| public function setFimValid($fimValid): void
292| {
293| $this->fimValid = $fimValid;
294| }
295|
296| public function getIndRetif()
297| {
298| return $this->indRetif;
299| }
300|
301| public function setIndRetif($indRetif): void
302| {
303| $this->indRetif = $indRetif;
304| }
305|
306| public function getBatch()
307| {
308| return $this->batch;
309| }
310|
311| public function setBatch($batch): void
312| {
313| $this->batch = $batch;
314| }
315|
316| public function getResponse()
317| {
318| return $this->response;
319| }
320|
321| public function setResponse($response): void
322| {
323| $this->response = $response;
324| }
325|
326| public function getIndApuracao()
327| {
328| return $this->indApuracao;
329| }
330|
331| public function setIndApuracao($indApuracao): void
332| {
333| $this->indApuracao = $indApuracao;
334| }
335|
336| public function getPerApur()
337| {
338| return $this->perApur;
339| }
340|
341| public function setPerApur($perApur): void
342| {
343| $this->perApur = $perApur;
344| }
345|
346| public function getIndGuia()
347| {
348| return $this->indGuia;
349| }
350|
351| public function setIndGuia($indGuia): void
352| {
353| $this->indGuia = $indGuia;
354| }
355|
356|
357|}
Request #45
deepseek-v4-flash
P:77.2K C:1.96K CR:73.86K CW:0
16122ms
Reasoning
OK entity has all required methods via inheritance. `status` is nullable? Column `status` length=50 no nullable specified → NOT NULL. In new event creation, they setStatus('pendente') before persist. Good.
Important: status column is `nullable=false`, and in the parent, no default value is set in the constructor (status not initialized). For a NEW event, they set status 'pendente' explicitly. OK.
Now consider the 'updated' path where the existing event is 'pendente' but not created via this automation — they set updatedAt but do they need to persist? The object is managed (from repository), so changes tracked; persist not required but they do apply payload and persist anyway.
Wait, in 'updated' path, they call setUpdatedAt and later apply payload/persist — yes within the `if eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable'` block.
OK so far no extra bugs. Let me look at the repository `EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository` for hints of how events are matched and statuses used in the guides. Let me read the beginning of repository to understand statuses used ('pendente', 'enviado', 'processado', etc.).
Also, I want to examine the offboarding entity to understand `getDismissalDate()`/`getRequestedAt()`. Also check that FlowInstanceMember sourceMetadata stores; fine.
Now, examine the migration doc requirement: PR's migration is within review group, plus documentation referenced docs/database-changes/2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template.md is among the changed files list (9 files, includes the two docs files). But docs files are NOT in review_files; only config/automations/offboarding.yaml etc. The doc requirement per user-specific migration rule says documentation should exist in docs/database-changes/; it exists (in the overall commit list). Good; not a finding.
Now think about new real issues to report. Let me carefully re-examine details not covered by the 7 confirmed:
**Confirmed findings 1-7**:
1. down() cascade delete of flow_instances + doesn't remove workflows/workflow_products.
2. seed all companies + global product activation.
3. event search not tied to current dismissal; existing non-pendente event prevents creating new draft (readmission scenario).
4. updating pendente event overwrites fields with empty config payload.
5. responsible id not validated against company isolation.
6. intOrNull truncation for percAliment/vrAlim decimal.
7. god-object concern.
Now additional real issues that I could report:
### Issue 8 (new): No guard that the automation runs only once / duplicate notifications when stage re-enter occurs; plus when event not found and draft is created with empty required data (dtDeslig null) and status 'pendente'. Not enough.
### Issue 9 (new): The `buildEsocialS2299DraftPayload` uses `dataDesligamento` from the offboarding `getDismissalDate()`, but no mapping to dismissal motive or whether offboarding has dismissal date. Wait — is there possibly an exit date stored elsewhere (e.g., exit_date defined on FlowInstanceMember/offboarding stage automation), not in OffboardingMember? Let me examine OffboardingMember and Offboarding entity fields for exit date fields. Search for getExitDate etc. But the payload just stores empty motivo ('') etc. Draft with empty required motivo and maybe dismissal date from requestedAt. Since this is just for review, acceptable-ish, but motivo empty means the draft requires the responsible to fill it. Not a bug per se.
### Issue 10 (new): The action returns success even if notify fails, etc. fine.
### Issue 11: When `$company->getEsocialMode() !== null` but company has no CNPJ (cnpj null), onlyDigits('') returns '', event set nrInscTransmissor ''. Then persist fails NOT NULL? nrInscTransmissor nullable=true (column length 36 nullable true). OK.
### Issue 12 (new): In `executeNotify` for the S-2299 action, `to => 'company_member'` resolution returns the responsible's *user*. However, when the notification config also merges into context `member_id => (string)$companyMember->getId()` (the leaving employee). replaceVariables uses member_id to look up member_name presumably. OK.
But there's a subtlety: In executeNotify, title/message variables replaced at line 6959-6960 with `$member` and `$context`. The context includes member_id. But the recipient resolution merges config, etc. Fine.
### Issue 13: **In-app NotificationSpecialist has no 'esocial_s2299_review_url' property or button** — but buttonUrl '/chat?adriana=1'. OK.
### Issue 14 (new): Chat for system sender sends fullMessage with the message text; message includes no URL (good), instructs to open Adriana chat. Fine.
### Issue 15 (new, real): The action only sends a notification to the responsible person if the company member has a user. What if responsible is a CompanyMembers row but user null? CompanyMembers may not always have a User. Actually in this system, CompanyMembers is per-company representation and almost always has a user. Not worth reporting.
### Issue 16 (new, real): **Regression possibility due to `$isSystemSender` change:** For PayrollClosingBpmnService::SOURCE_TYPE previously logic — was strictly member source type; now additionally config flag. But some flows may already pass config containing `system_sender` key? It's only introduced here. No regression.
### Issue 17: But `$config` param of sendChatNotification might be `[]` for callers not passing config (signature default). filter_var false. OK.
### Issue 18: In the flow_detail.html.twig, adding the mapping under 'create_processo_seletivo' section; there's a computed automation display name function. fine.
### Issue 19 (new): **list_automations / flow_detail labels**: they added label mapping for 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' but did not add mapping for the *trigger* 'employee_enters_stage'? Not needed.
### Issue 20 (new): The offboarding.yaml new automation block is placed in `actions.movement`, but movement actions in that YAML probably represent actions that change stage. In the flow editor the UI might treat this action as movement; but YAML is config data loaded into the editor's action picker; categories 'notifications', 'movement', 'visibility' presumably map to UI groups. Placement affects UI grouping only.
### Issue 21 (new): In `buildEsocialS2299ReviewUrl`, it generates route 'my_company_member_manage' for the member. But the S-2299 review URL appended '?esocialTab=desligamento'. The member manage route may require permission. OK.
### Issue 22 (new): **The event is created with `$event->setEsocialTrabalhador($esocialTrabalhador)` etc but nothing sets `uniqueEventId`** which is a unique column (nullable). Many other event creation flows compute a uniqueEventId. If other code later uses uniqueEventId for dedup or for sending, absence could break send logic or produce events without unique id. Let me check how S-2299 event sends or how uniqueEventId is used for S-2299: In EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository, do they compute uniqueEventId? Search for 'uniqueEventId' usage within S2299 repo/service. Let me check the repository for save functions, e.g., how the guides/termino save the event. That might reveal a missing required field when creating the event directly through this automation (e.g., needs idEvento etc.).
Let me read EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository lines 1-140.
Actually confirmed finding #4 already references repository save with event fields. Let me look at repository's `updateFromDesligamento`/save functions to compare what fields an official event requires vs what automation sets. In particular, does repository require `dadosRemuneracao`? Yes not null. They set.
Let me read repository file.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 200, "file_path": "src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php", "start_line": 1}
Result
File: src/Repository/EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository.php (Total lines: 296)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-200
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Repository;
4|
5|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
6|use Doctrine\Bundle\DoctrineBundle\Repository\ServiceEntityRepository;
7|use Doctrine\ORM\OptimisticLockException;
8|use Doctrine\ORM\ORMException;
9|use Doctrine\Persistence\ManagerRegistry;
10|
11|/**
12| * @extends ServiceEntityRepository<EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento>
13| *
14| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento|null find($id, $lockMode = null, $lockVersion = null)
15| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento|null findOneBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null)
16| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[] findAll()
17| * @method EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento[] findBy(array $criteria, array $orderBy = null, $limit = null, $offset = null)
18| */
19|class EsocialS2299EvtDesligamentoRepository extends ServiceEntityRepository
20|{
21| public function __construct(ManagerRegistry $registry)
22| {
23| parent::__construct($registry, EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento::class);
24| }
25|
26| /**
27| * @throws ORMException
28| * @throws OptimisticLockException
29| */
30| public function add(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $entity, bool $flush = true): void
31| {
32| $this->_em->persist($entity);
33| if ($flush) {
34| $this->_em->flush();
35| }
36| }
37|
38| /**
39| * @throws ORMException
40| * @throws OptimisticLockException
41| */
42| public function remove(EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento $entity, bool $flush = true): void
43| {
44| $this->_em->remove($entity);
45| if ($flush) {
46| $this->_em->flush();
47| }
48| }
49|
50| function sanitizeCNPJ($cnpj) {
51| return preg_replace('/\D/', '', $cnpj);
52| }
53|
54| function sanitizeCPF($cpf) {
55| return preg_replace('/\D/', '', $cpf);
56| }
57|
58| private function buildDateOrNull(?string $date): ?\DateTime
59| {
60| return !empty($date) ? new \DateTime($date) : null;
61| }
62|
63| public function saveEventS2299($esocialDadosTrabalhador, $data, $company, $dadosRemuneracao): EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento
64| {
65| $event = new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento();
66| $event->setModo( 'INC');
67| $event->setCompany($company);
68| $event->setTpAmb($company->getEsocialMode() ?? '2');
69| $event->setTpInscTransmissor(1);
70| $event->setNrInscTransmissor($this->sanitizeCNPJ($company->getCnpj()));
71| $event->setEsocialTrabalhador($esocialDadosTrabalhador);
72| $event->setIndRetif(1);
73| $event->setStatus('pendente');
74| $event->setCreatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable());
75| $event->setMtvDeslig($data['motivoDesligamento'] ?? null);
76| $event->setDtDeslig($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataDesligamento']) ?? null);
77| $event->setDtAvPrv($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataConcessaoAviso']) ?? null);
78| $event->setIndPagtoApi($data['avisoPrevioIndenizado'] ? 'S' : 'N');
79| $event->setDtProjFimApi($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataTerminoAviso']) ?? null);
80| $event->setPensAlim($data['pensAlim'] ?? null);
81| $event->setPercAliment($data['percAliment'] ?? null);
82| $event->setVrAlim($data['vrAlim'] ?? null);
83| $event->setNrProcTrab($data['numeroProcesso'] ?? null);
84| $event->setIndPdv($data['indPdv'] ?? null);
85| $event->setCpfSubstituto($this->sanitizeCPF($data['cpfSubstituto']) ?? null);
86| $event->setDtNascto($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dataNascimentoTitular']) ?? null);
87| $event->setNovoCpf($this->sanitizeCPF($data['novoCpfTrabalhador']) ?? null);
88| $event->setIndRemun($data['indRemun'] ?? null);
89| $event->setDtFimRemun($this->buildDateOrNull($data['dtFimRemun']) ?? null);
90| $event->setInsConsig($data['matriculaInstituicao'] ?? null);
91| $event->setNrContr($data['numeroContrato'] ?? null);
92| $event->setDadosRemuneracao($dadosRemuneracao);
93|
94| $this->add($event);
95|
96| return $event;
97| }
98|
99| /**
100| * Extrai todos os dados do evento S-2299 para formatação no FlowableVariablesService
101| *
102| * @param int $eventId ID do evento (EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento)
103| * @return array|null Dados estruturados do evento e relacionamentos, ou null se não encontrado
104| */
105| public function getFlowableDataForTemplate(int $eventId): ?array
106| {
107| $event = $this->find($eventId);
108|
109| if (!$event) {
110| return null;
111| }
112|
113| // Extrair dados principais do evento
114| $data = [
115| 'id' => $event->getId(),
116| 'mtvDeslig' => $event->getMtvDeslig(),
117| 'dtDeslig' => $event->getDtDeslig()?->format('Y-m-d'),
118| 'dtAvPrv' => $event->getDtAvPrv()?->format('Y-m-d'),
119| 'indPagtoApi' => $event->getIndPagtoApi(),
120| 'dtProjFimApi' => $event->getDtProjFimApi()?->format('Y-m-d'),
121| 'pensAlim' => $event->getPensAlim(),
122| 'percAliment' => $event->getPercAliment(),
123| 'vrAlim' => $event->getVrAlim(),
124| 'nrProcTrab' => $event->getNrProcTrab(),
125| 'indPdv' => $event->getIndPdv(),
126| 'cpfSubstituto' => $event->getCpfSubstituto(),
127| 'dtNascto' => $event->getDtNascto()?->format('Y-m-d'),
128| 'novoCpf' => $event->getNovoCpf(),
129| 'indRemun' => $event->getIndRemun(),
130| 'dtFimRemun' => $event->getDtFimRemun()?->format('Y-m-d'),
131| 'insConsig' => $event->getInsConsig(),
132| 'nrContr' => $event->getNrContr(),
133| ];
134|
135| // Extrair dados da classe pai (EsocialEvents)
136| $data['modo'] = $event->getModo();
137| $data['tpAmb'] = $event->getTpAmb();
138| $data['uniqueEventId'] = $event->getUniqueEventId();
139| $data['tpInscTransmissor'] = $event->getTpInscTransmissor();
140| $data['nrInscTransmissor'] = $event->getNrInscTransmissor();
141| $data['iniValid'] = $event->getIniValid();
142| $data['fimValid'] = $event->getFimValid();
143| $data['indRetif'] = $event->getIndRetif();
144| $data['indApuracao'] = $event->getIndApuracao();
145| $data['perApur'] = $event->getPerApur()?->format('Y-m-d');
146| $data['indGuia'] = $event->getIndGuia();
147| $data['status'] = $event->getStatus();
148| $data['createdAt'] = $event->getCreatedAt()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s');
149| $data['updatedAt'] = $event->getUpdatedAt()?->format('Y-m-d H:i:s');
150|
151| // Extrair dados da empresa
152| $company = $event->getCompany();
153| if ($company) {
154| $data['company'] = [
155| 'id' => $company->getId(),
156| 'name' => $company->getName(),
157| 'code' => $company->getCode(),
158| 'cnpj' => $company->getCnpj(),
159| ];
160| } else {
161| $data['company'] = null;
162| }
163|
164| // Extrair dados do trabalhador eSocial relacionado
165| $esocialTrabalhador = $event->getEsocialTrabalhador();
166| if ($esocialTrabalhador) {
167| $dadosTrabalhador = $esocialTrabalhador->getDadosTrabalhador();
168| $endereco = $esocialTrabalhador->getEndereco();
169|
170| $data['esocialTrabalhador'] = [
171| 'id' => $esocialTrabalhador->getId(),
172| 'isTrabalhadorSemVinculo' => $esocialTrabalhador->getIsTrabalhadorSemVinculo(),
173| 'dadosTrabalhador' => $dadosTrabalhador ? [
174| 'cpfTrab' => $dadosTrabalhador->getCpfTrab(),
175| 'nmTrab' => $dadosTrabalhador->getNmTrab(),
176| 'sexo' => $dadosTrabalhador->getSexo(),
177| 'racaCor' => $dadosTrabalhador->getRacaCor(),
178| 'estCiv' => $dadosTrabalhador->getEstCiv(),
179| 'grauInstr' => $dadosTrabalhador->getGrauInstr(),
180| 'nmSoc' => $dadosTrabalhador->getNmSoc(),
181| 'dtNascto' => $dadosTrabalhador->getDtNascto()?->format('Y-m-d'),
182| 'paisNascto' => $dadosTrabalhador->getPaisNascto(),
183| 'paisNac' => $dadosTrabalhador->getPaisNac(),
184| 'fonePrinc' => $dadosTrabalhador->getFonePrinc(),
185| 'emailPrinc' => $dadosTrabalhador->getEmailPrinc(),
186| 'dtAltDadosPessoais' => $dadosTrabalhador->getDtAltDadosPessoais()?->format('Y-m-d'),
187| ] : null,
188| 'endereco' => $endereco ? [
189| 'brasil' => $endereco->getBrasil() ? [
190| 'tpLograd' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getTpLograd(),
191| 'dscLograd' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getDscLograd(),
192| 'nrLograd' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getNrLograd(),
193| 'complemento' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getComplemento(),
194| 'bairro' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getBairro(),
195| 'cep' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getCep(),
196| 'codMunic' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getCodMunic(),
197| 'uf' => $endereco->getBrasil()->getUf(),
198| ] : null,
199| 'exterior' => $endereco->getExterior() ? [
200| 'paisResid' => $endereco->getExterior()->getPaisResid(),
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Entity/OffboardingMember.php", "src/Entity/Offboarding.php"], "search_text": "exit|dismissal|Dismissal", "use_perl_regexp": true}
Result
File: src/Entity/OffboardingMember.php Match lines: 5 106| private $dismissalDate; 380| public function getDismissalDate(): ?\DateTimeInterface 382| return $this->dismissalDate; 385| public function setDismissalDate(?\DateTimeInterface $dismissalDate): self 387| $this->dismissalDate = $dismissalDate;
Request #46
deepseek-v4-flash
P:82.44K C:477 CR:79.1K CW:0
5018ms
Reasoning
Note: the repository's saveEventS2299 uses data['motivoDesligamento']?? null and data values. And `percAliment`/`vrAlim` set to whatever numeric. `percAliment` intOrNull truncation issue already flagged.
Important observation: In the repository save, they call `$event->setPercAliment($data['percAliment'] ?? null)` where the data presumably comes from the form/JSON with decimal as string/number, Doctrine decimal type converts numeric strings. The new automation `intOrNull` truncates — flagged #6.
Now potential NEW real issue: In new automation event creation, `setStatus('pendente')` and uniqueEventId null. Official event repository saveEventS2299 also doesn't set uniqueEventId. OK consistent.
Now let me now look at possible regression on the twig fix: In `motivo_desligamento.html.twig`, the fix checks `prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab`. Let me look at surrounding template lines to check other references to `prevEvts.desligamento` (the old code incorrectly referencing `.desligamento` for `termino` data). It changed from `prevEvts.desligamento` condition to `prevEvts.termino`; what is `prevEvts` structure? Is the `termino` the previous S-2399 (TSV termino) and `desligamento` S-2299? The value field is `nrProcTrab` from termino. OK. Let's read the template around that line to see other similar condition mismatches (e.g., other fields with same pattern elsewhere in the template using wrong object).
Let me read the template lines 1-140.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 140, "file_path": "templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig", "start_line": 1}
Result
File: templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig (Total lines: 124)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-124
1|<section id="termino-motivo-desligamento" class="dynamic-termino-section" style="display: none;">
2| <form>
3| <h5>Motivo do Desligamento</h5>
4| <p class="card-description">
5| Informe os dados relacionados ao motivo do desligamento ou término do trabalhador.
6| </p>
7| <div class="row">
8| <!-- Motivo do Desligamento -->
9|<div class="col-md-6 mb-3">
10| <label for="termino-motivoDesligamento">Motivo do Desligamento <span class="text-danger">*</span></label>
11| <select class="form-control" id="termino-motivoDesligamento" name="termino-motivoDesligamento" required>
12| <option value="" selected disabled>Selecione um motivo</option>
13| <option value="01"
14| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '01' %}
15| selected
16| {% endif %}>
17| 01 - Exoneração do diretor não empregado sem justa causa
18| </option>
19| <option value="02"
20| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '02' %}
21| selected
22| {% endif %}>
23| 02 - Término de mandato do diretor não empregado não reconduzido
24| </option>
25| <option value="03"
26| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '03' %}
27| selected
28| {% endif %}>
29| 03 - Exoneração a pedido de diretor não empregado
30| </option>
31| <option value="04"
32| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '04' %}
33| selected
34| {% endif %}>
35| 04 - Exoneração do diretor não empregado por culpa recíproca ou força maior
36| </option>
37| <option value="05"
38| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '05' %}
39| selected
40| {% endif %}>
41| 05 - Morte do diretor não empregado
42| </option>
43| <option value="06"
44| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '06' %}
45| selected
46| {% endif %}>
47| 06 - Exoneração por falência ou encerramento
48| </option>
49| <option value="07"
50| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '07' %}
51| selected
52| {% endif %}>
53| 07 - Mudança de CPF
54| </option>
55| <option value="99"
56| {% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.mtvDesligTsv == '99' %}
57| selected
58| {% endif %}>
59| 99 - Outros
60| </option>
61| </select>
62| <small class="form-text text-muted">
63| Selecione o código conforme a Tabela 19 do eSocial.
64| </small>
65|</div>
66|
67|
68|
69|
70|
71| <!-- Data do Término -->
72| <div class="col-md-6 mb-3">
73| <label for="termino-dataTermino">Data do Término <span class="text-danger">*</span></label>
74| <input
75| type="date"
76| id="termino-dataTermino"
77| name="termino-dataTermino"
78| class="form-control"
79| required
80| placeholder="Selecione a data do término"
81| value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.dtTerm %}{{ prevEvts.termino.dtTerm|date('Y-m-d') }}{% endif %}">
82| <small class="form-text text-muted">
83| Último dia trabalhado. Deve ser igual ou anterior à data atual + 10 dias.
84| </small>
85| </div>
86|
87|
88|
89| <!-- Número Processo Trabalhista -->
90| <div class="col-md-6 mb-3">
91| <label for="termino-numeroProcesso">Número Processo Trabalhista</label>
92| <input
93| type="text"
94| id="termino-numeroProcesso"
95| name="termino-numeroProcesso"
96| class="form-control"
97| maxlength="20"
98| placeholder="Informe o número do processo trabalhista"
99| value="{% if prevEvts.termino and prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab %}{{ prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab }}{% endif %}">
100| <small class="form-text text-muted">
101| Número que identifica o processo trabalhista (opcional).
102| </small>
103| </div>
104|</div>
105|
106| <div id="buttons-container" class="mt-4"></div>
107| </form>
108|</section>
109|
110|<script>
111| document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", () => {
112| const dateField = document.getElementById("termino-dataTermino");
113|
114| if (dateField) {
115| const today = new Date();
116| const maxDate = new Date(today);
117| maxDate.setDate(today.getDate() + 10);
118|
119| const formattedMaxDate = maxDate.toISOString().split("T")[0]; // Formata para AAAA-MM-DD
120| dateField.setAttribute("max", formattedMaxDate); // Define o atributo max dinamicamente
121| }
122| });
123|</script>
124|
Request #47
deepseek-v4-flash
P:84.46K C:826 CR:82.82K CW:0
7937ms
Reasoning
The template fix is proper: all other references in this template already use `prevEvts.termino`. Fix aligns.
Now let me examine the remaining subtle possibility in the service.
**New finding candidate — no unique constraint check / multiple pendente drafts**: If the automation runs for two different offboarding members of the same company member (a person offboarded twice), both would create a pendente event (if no existing one). Since it's the same trabalhador, the second offboarding would overwrite/update the pendente event of the first if found. Wait: findLatest... by trabalhador. If first offboarding created pendente event (not yet transmitted), second offboarding run updates that same event with its payload, linking dadosRemuneracao etc. Actually, the payload metadata is stored per offboarding member though (in member sourceMetadata). The event fields only reflect the second offboarding; the first offboarding's audit trail shows the event got overwritten. That is basically finding #4/3 family.
**New: sourceMetadata is on FlowInstanceMember; where is that read by front-end? Possibly nowhere except audit. OK.
**New: In executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft, when `$company->getEsocialMode() === null` they return skipped without recording audit metadata. Could be a real miss: the requirement says rascunho salvo para auditoria; when eSocial disabled, no metadata is recorded and no notification. Is that a bug? Possibly not intended; but the flow template is created for all companies even when eSocial disabled (per migration). For a company with eSocial disabled, adding this automation at final stage will silently do nothing each time. Not a bug — just no-op.
**But consider: the flow template default includes this action even for companies that have eSocial disabled.** Requirement: "offboarding com eSocial" is a separate template that should probably only be seeded for companies with eSocial enabled. Already covered by finding #2 (#2 says even for tenants not using offboarding/eSocial).
OK, given the primary goal is to find NEW issues beyond the confirmed ones. Let me focus on remaining files.
Review `list_automations.html.twig` & `flow_detail.html.twig` diffs — pure label additions. Not issues.
`config/automations/offboarding.yaml` — compare new block to others to detect a logic mismatch. There is an inconsistency: The new action is placed under `actions.movement`, but the allowed trigger blocked list includes "offboarding_completed". This YAML action is a *movement* category action? Actually placement: the category grouping might be display categories in the UI; the section headers "movement" may group actions that move between stages. But `create_esocial_s2299_draft` does not move stage. It would appear in the wrong UI category. Let me look at YAML categories to see what other actions are in `movement` and what other actions might be better (e.g., maybe an 'integration' or 'esocial' category exists). Let me read the rest of the YAML file (260-481).
Actually, `delay_platform_access_removal` and `delay_offboarding_visibility` in the YAML are placed under "visibility". Since there's no esocial category maybe 'movement' is where actions triggered on entering stage are placed? But `create_esocial_s2299_draft` is more like an automation action triggered on stage entry to create a draft. Hmm. Let's see the sections after 260.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 481, "file_path": "config/automations/offboarding.yaml", "start_line": 260}
Result
File: config/automations/offboarding.yaml (Total lines: 481)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 260-481
260| - "any_activity_completed"
261| - "all_activities_completed"
262| - "all_activities_completed_plus_days"
263| - "days_in_stage"
264| - "days_after_offboarding_start"
265| blocked_trigger_message: "Esta ação só pode ser usada com o trigger 'Colaborador concluir o offboarding'"
266| last_stage_only: true
267| description: "Após finalizar o offboarding, o colaborador ainda terá acesso à plataforma por X dias. Após esse período, o acesso será removido automaticamente (is_removed = 1)."
268| config_options:
269| - { id: "1", label: "1 dia" }
270| - { id: "2", label: "2 dias" }
271| - { id: "3", label: "3 dias" }
272| - { id: "5", label: "5 dias" }
273| - { id: "7", label: "7 dias" }
274| - { id: "10", label: "10 dias" }
275| - { id: "14", label: "14 dias" }
276| - { id: "21", label: "21 dias" }
277| - { id: "30", label: "30 dias" }
278| - { id: "45", label: "45 dias" }
279| - { id: "60", label: "60 dias" }
280| - { id: "90", label: "90 dias" }
281|
282| recruitment:
283| - id: "create_processo_seletivo"
284| type: "create_processo_seletivo"
285| title: "Criar processo seletivo para reposição da vaga"
286| icon: "fa-solid fa-user-plus"
287| has_config: true
288| config_type: "recruitment_config"
289| config_label: "Configurar processo seletivo"
290| allowed_triggers:
291| - "offboarding_completed"
292| blocked_triggers:
293| - "employee_enters_stage"
294| - "deadline_reached"
295| - "exit_date"
296| - "any_activity_completed"
297| - "all_activities_completed"
298| - "all_activities_completed_plus_days"
299| - "days_in_stage"
300| - "days_after_offboarding_start"
301| blocked_trigger_message: "Esta ação só pode ser usada com o trigger 'Colaborador concluir o offboarding'"
302| selectable_fields:
303| - field: "flow_template_id"
304| type: "flow_template_dropdown"
305| label: "Máscara/Template do processo seletivo"
306| required: true
307| order: 1
308| config_preset:
309| copy_cargo: true
310| copy_department: true
311| copy_manager_as_responsible: true
312| create_job: true
313| job_vacancies: 1
314| process_status: "active"
315| process_name_pattern: "Reposição - {cargo} - {department}"
316|
317|# ============================================================================
318|# REGRAS DE AVANÇO
319|# ============================================================================
320|# Divididas em dois tipos:
321|# - fixed: Para etapas FIXAS (com atividades específicas - Etapa 1, 2, 3)
322|# - variable: Para etapas VARIÁVEIS (offboarding inteiro como uma etapa)
323|# ============================================================================
324|
325|advance_rules:
326| # ============================================================================
327| # ETAPAS FIXAS (Fixed Steps)
328| # Baseado nas opções do TypeOfStepAdvance existente
329| # ============================================================================
330|
331| manual:
332| - id: "manual_advance"
333| title: "Avanço Manual"
334| type: "advance"
335| condition_type: "manual"
336| operator: "manual"
337| has_config: false
338| flow_type: "fixed"
339| description: "Essa etapa só inicia quando o colaborador é movido manualmente para a próxima etapa."
340| legacy_mapping:
341| type_of_step_advance: "Manual"
342| type_of_step_advance_id: 2
343|
344| activity_based:
345| - id: "advance_all_activities_completed"
346| title: "Automático (todas atividades concluídas)"
347| type: "advance"
348| condition_type: "activities_completed"
349| operator: "all"
350| has_config: false
351| flow_type: "fixed"
352| description: "Inicie essa etapa assim que todas as atividades da etapa anterior forem marcadas como concluídas. Caso esta seja a primeira etapa, ela será automaticamente iniciada assim que os membros forem incluídos no processo."
353| legacy_mapping:
354| type_of_step_advance: "Automático"
355| type_of_step_advance_id: 3
356|
357| time_based:
358| - id: "advance_scheduled"
359| title: "Agendamento"
360| type: "advance"
361| condition_type: "scheduled"
362| operator: "equals"
363| has_config: true
364| config_type: "scheduling"
365| config_label: "Configurar agendamento"
366| flow_type: "fixed"
367| description: "Agendar o início da etapa com base em dias, direção e referência de data."
368| legacy_mapping:
369| type_of_step_advance: "Agendamento"
370| type_of_step_advance_id: 1
371| config_options:
372| fields:
373| - name: "daysCount"
374| label: "Quantidade de dias"
375| type: "number_input"
376| min: 0
377| max: 365
378| default: 7
379| - name: "relativeDirection"
380| label: "Direção"
381| type: "dropdown"
382| source: "relativeDirections"
383| - name: "dateReference"
384| label: "Referência de data"
385| type: "dropdown"
386| source: "dateReferences"
387|
388| # ============================================================================
389| # ETAPAS VARIÁVEIS (Variable Steps)
390| # Para quando um offboarding inteiro é uma etapa intermediária no flow
391| # ============================================================================
392|
393| offboarding_status_based:
394| - id: "advance_offboarding_completed"
395| title: "Avançar quando offboarding completo"
396| type: "advance"
397| condition_type: "offboarding_completed"
398| operator: "equals"
399| has_config: false
400| flow_type: "variable"
401| description: "Avança automaticamente quando o colaborador concluir todas as etapas do offboarding."
402|
403| - id: "advance_offboarding_percentage"
404| title: "Avançar quando {value}% do offboarding concluído"
405| type: "advance"
406| condition_type: "offboarding_percentage"
407| operator: "greater_than_or_equal"
408| has_config: true
409| config_type: "number_input"
410| config_label: "Porcentagem mínima (%)"
411| flow_type: "variable"
412| description: "Avança quando o colaborador completar a porcentagem mínima do offboarding."
413| config_options:
414| min: 1
415| max: 100
416| step: 5
417| default: 80
418|
419| - id: "advance_offboarding_stage_reached"
420| title: "Avançar quando colaborador chegar em etapa específica"
421| type: "advance"
422| condition_type: "offboarding_stage_reached"
423| operator: "equals"
424| has_config: true
425| config_type: "stage_select"
426| config_label: "Selecionar etapa"
427| flow_type: "variable"
428| description: "Avança quando o colaborador chegar em uma etapa específica do offboarding."
429|
430| - id: "block_offboarding_abandoned"
431| title: "Reprovar se offboarding abandonado"
432| type: "block"
433| condition_type: "offboarding_abandoned"
434| operator: "equals"
435| has_config: false
436| flow_type: "variable"
437| description: "Move para reprovados se o colaborador abandonar o offboarding."
438|
439| # Regras de tempo para etapas variáveis
440| variable_time_based:
441| - id: "advance_days_in_offboarding"
442| title: "Avançar após {value} dias no offboarding"
443| type: "advance"
444| condition_type: "days_in_offboarding"
445| operator: "equals"
446| has_config: true
447| config_type: "number_input"
448| config_label: "Número de dias"
449| flow_type: "variable"
450| description: "Avança automaticamente após o colaborador ficar X dias no offboarding."
451| config_options:
452| min: 1
453| max: 365
454| default: 30
455|
456| - id: "block_timeout_offboarding"
457| title: "Reprovar após {value} dias sem progresso"
458| type: "block"
459| condition_type: "timeout_no_progress"
460| operator: "equals"
461| has_config: true
462| config_type: "number_input"
463| config_label: "Dias máximos sem progresso"
464| flow_type: "variable"
465| description: "Move para reprovados se o colaborador ficar X dias sem avançar no offboarding."
466| config_options:
467| min: 1
468| max: 365
469| default: 60
470|
471| # Manual para etapas variáveis
472| variable_manual:
473| - id: "manual_advance_variable"
474| title: "Avanço Manual"
475| type: "advance"
476| condition_type: "manual"
477| operator: "manual"
478| has_config: false
479| flow_type: "variable"
480| description: "Essa etapa só avança quando movida manualmente pelo RH ou gestor."
481|
Request #48
deepseek-v4-flash
P:87.87K C:500 CR:85.25K CW:0
5181ms
Reasoning
Interesting: `create_processo_seletivo` is placed under `actions.recruitment`, not movement. So the new action `create_esocial_s2299_draft` is placed under `actions.movement`, which seems like an odd grouping since movement only had `move_to_next_stage`. But placement may just be for UI display grouping; new action may be more appropriately placed in a new "eSocial" category or "recruitment". This is a UI grouping nuance, low severity. Actually since the UI probably uses these groups to place actions into tabs/dropdowns in automation creation, the wrong group means the action appears among "movement" actions. Might be a maintainability/UX issue (low). Not central enough.
Now think about whether there's an actual correctness bug in the config: `allowed_triggers: [employee_enters_stage]`, while create_esocial_s2299_draft should fire at final stage entry. It will also be selectable at other stages too (any stage's on_enter) — that is fine since action would just create/update the draft at whatever stage it's placed. Good.
Now let me search for how YAML `allowed_triggers` compares with other automation and whether `blocked_trigger_message` spelling... fine.
Now let me review the rest of the migration file for other issue types — particularly the JSON encoded settings and template_category. Let's see the flow_templates schema columns and existing seeds to compare (e.g., does flow_templates table include column template_category? and settings column name?). There is an existing seed migration Version20260518151423 which inserts into flow_templates. Let's check its INSERT for flow_templates to compare columns.
Search "INSERT INTO flow_templates" in migrations.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["migrations/*.php"], "search_text": "INSERT INTO flow_templates"}
Result
File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php Match lines: 2 635| 'INSERT INTO flow_templates (workflow_id, company_id, name, description, is_active, settings, template_category, created_at, updated_at) 1238| 'INSERT INTO flow_templates (workflow_id, company_id, name, description, is_active, settings, template_category, created_at, updated_at) File: migrations/Version20260519173602.php Match lines: 1 64| 'INSERT INTO flow_templates (workflow_id, company_id, name, description, is_active, settings, template_category, created_at, updated_at) File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php Match lines: 1 212| 'INSERT INTO flow_templates (workflow_id, company_id, name, description, is_active, settings, template_category, created_at, updated_at)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["migrations/*.php"], "search_text": "flow_template_products"}
Result
File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php
Match lines: 15
21| * - Constraint fix: flow_template_products unique index (allow same product in multiple slots)
125| // -- flow_template_products -------------------------------------------
126| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_template_products ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS order_index INT NOT NULL DEFAULT 0');
127| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_template_products ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS template_type VARCHAR(20) DEFAULT \'fixo\'');
128| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_template_products ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS slot_index INT NOT NULL DEFAULT 0');
404| // flow_template_products: drop old (flow_template_id, product_id) unique — blocks multi-slot products.
406| if ($this->indexExists('flow_template_products', 'unique_template_product')) {
407| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_template_products DROP INDEX unique_template_product');
409| if (!$this->indexExists('flow_template_products', 'unique_template_product_slot')) {
410| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_template_products ADD CONSTRAINT unique_template_product_slot UNIQUE (flow_template_id, product_id, slot_index)');
667| 'INSERT INTO flow_template_products (flow_template_id, product_id, order_index, template_type, slot_index)
1268| 'INSERT INTO flow_template_products (flow_template_id, product_id, order_index, template_type, slot_index)
1327| // Replace flow_template_products with journey-specific set
1329| 'DELETE FROM flow_template_products WHERE flow_template_id = :t',
1345| 'INSERT INTO flow_template_products (flow_template_id, product_id, order_index, template_type, slot_index)
File: migrations/Version20260519173602.php
Match lines: 4
99| 'DELETE FROM flow_template_products WHERE flow_template_id = :templateId',
133| 'SELECT id FROM flow_template_products
141| 'UPDATE flow_template_products
150| 'INSERT INTO flow_template_products (flow_template_id, product_id, order_index, template_type, slot_index)
File: migrations/Version20260519203024.php
Match lines: 2
168| if ($this->tableExists('flow_template_products')) {
170| "DELETE FROM flow_template_products WHERE flow_template_id IN {$tpl}",
File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
Match lines: 6
28| foreach (['company', 'products', 'workflows', 'workflow_products', 'flow_templates', 'flow_template_products', 'flow_stages', 'flow_activities', 'flow_automations'] as $table) {
106| if ($this->tableExists('flow_template_products')) {
108| 'DELETE FROM flow_template_products WHERE flow_template_id = :templateId',
230| 'SELECT id FROM flow_template_products
238| 'UPDATE flow_template_products
247| 'INSERT INTO flow_template_products (flow_template_id, product_id, order_index, template_type, slot_index)
Request #49
deepseek-v4-flash
P:89.29K C:1.85K CR:88.32K CW:0
15380ms
Reasoning
Structure matches existing migrations. So no issue there.
Now, there's another subtle issue I noticed in migration: In `ensureStage`, the seeded stages set `product_slot_index = NULL`. When creating an offboarding from the template, the product is offboarding product in slot 0. The stage linking to product: flow_stages with product_id = product id and product_slot_index NULL. Good.
**Potential issue:** In the previous version of the file the stages were inserted via ensureStage; but also the flow template default stages may also need `stage_category` maybe used in flows. They set stage_category NULL. Existing flow_stages have stage_category with values like 'preparacao'/'andamento'. Since NULL may break rendering that expects category? Not sure.
Let's check how flow_stages stage_category is used for offboarding templates. Search for how stage_category values are used in code/offboarding.
Actually the migration at Version20260518151423 sets stage_category values in journeys; but for offboarding stage categories might be used in rendering or automation. If null is not handled, may produce weird UI. But templates created by this migration might be for a default flow where the categories matter. Let me search code for `stage_category` usage with offboarding.
Rather than chase these, let me look at the risk areas I can strongly validate.
**Question: Is there an issue with seeding automations on stage when `trigger_type` is on_all_activities_complete and the stage has 1 activity "Offboarding"?** When the template is instantiated into an offboarding instance, the offboarding activity probably corresponds to the entire offboarding product, not per-stage generic activities. Hmm, actually the flow stages here are sub-stages of the "offboarding" product itself, each with an "Offboarding" activity? That's ambiguous, but out of scope.
**Now, let me consider the migration's product_id scoping in stage lookup with 'Offboarding' activity and the real template: I'll not go down this path.
Let me turn attention to the AutomationExecutionService for logic issues.
### New candidate: if automation execution for offboarding runs but the FlowInstanceMember has user? Not relevant.
### New candidate: **sourceMetadata merge conflict.** The action overwrites `$metadata['esocialS2299Draft']` on every run — fine.
### New candidate: **eventStatus 'updated' misreported when only draft created** — In the message: returns 'Rascunho do S-2299 registrado; dados eSocial pendentes impedem criar o evento oficial' when event null (draft_only). OK.
### New candidate: When eventStatus === 'updated' path, they set `$event->setUpdatedAt(new DateTimeImmutable())` at 14989, and apply payload etc. But this 'updated' path also applies when the previous event is pendente but is actually a different S-2299 for a *previous* dismissal of the same worker that hasn't been transmitted yet (rare). #3/#4 family.
### New candidate: **No flush of the event on its own** — they persist event, then persist member metadata and flush (which persists event too). OK.
### New candidate: When `$eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable'` and event null (i.e., missing dados), then `$event` is null and persist not executed; no event. Fine.
Now, something important: **In the `updated` or `created` path, they persist event, but never set the `uniqueEventId` (nullable unique).** Sending S-2299 later may rely on uniqueEventId? Since saveEventS2299 from repository also doesn't set uniqueEventId, no difference. OK.
### New candidate: Notifications reference `{{member_name}}` variable: message has 'O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado...'. The replacement uses context member_id. Let me check replaceVariables supports member_name via member_id. It presumably uses FlowableVariablesService or similar; it's used elsewhere with member_id context. OK.
Now let me step back and search the docs maybe there's something about the new feature in docs files (but docs files are not in the review group; I should focus on the review group files). We have 6 files. The most consequential are migration and service, already covered heavily with confirmed findings.
Let me see if there are additional NEW high-confidence issues in the service:
**Issue A: `executeNotify` doesn't set a `NotificationSpecialist` 'recordLink'** - not relevant.
**Issue B: In `executeNotify`, system_sender passes through but NotificationSpecialist is created for user, whose content shows the raw URL in message?** Actually message has no URL. message_html only in email. OK.
**Issue C:** For the email route, the config includes `'template' => null` but `skip_auto_email_template` not set. So executeSendEmail could derive auto template based on recipient type and product, then pick an e-mail DB template `offboarding-...`. If not found, might fall back to plain. Also could cause an unexpected email to be sent. Not a new bug; behavior existed.
**Issue D (new, real): The S-2299 automation may run in a worker where eSocial is enabled, but `EsocialDadosRemuneracao` may exist for the worker while the termination date could be before... skip.
**Issue E (new, real):** The **responsible resolution** uses `$member->getFlowInstance()?->getFlowResponsible()`. Wait — confirmed finding #5 focuses on cross-company config id usage. There's a related nuance: if config contains `member_id` (as the offboarding member id of the *leaving employee*)? In resolveEsocialS2299Responsible, `member_id` is read from config. But `member_id` is also a generic context key used for the leaving company member in notify. The automation config in the seeded template doesn't include member_id so it falls to flowResponsible. But if a user configures the action manually and includes "member_id", they might inadvertently set the responsible to be the leaving employee themselves (self-notification). Not a new bug.
**Issue F: idempotency promise** — requirement: "A automação é idempotente: não deve duplicar evento pendente já existente para o mesmo contexto." Implementation: if there is a pendente event (latest), updates it rather than create new. However, what if there are two pendente events already from a previous bug? It picks the latest by id and updates it, leaving older one untouched. Fine.
**Issue G:** Actually, there's a real subtle data integrity issue in this new method: The event selected (latest S-2299 for the trabalhador) may belong to **another company**? Events are filtered by trabalhador; trabalhador belongs to the company member (CompanyMembers of the company) — the esocialTrabalhador relation. Since we get esocialTrabalhador by companyMember of the current company, the events are for the same company. Fine.
**Issue H: When creating the event, `company` and esocialTrabalhador/remuneracao company consistency.** EsocialDadosRemuneracao found by trabalhador — same company presumably. OK.
Now migration again for an actual important NEW data-integrity bug:
**Bug candidate: In `up()`, ensureProduct inserts into products with only (name, active, slug).** If products table has additional NOT NULL columns without defaults (e.g., `icon` or `category`), the INSERT would fail. But because the product 'offboarding' likely already exists, that path rarely used; and migration lists 'products' table, expecting to seed it. Since the code inserts only (name, active, slug), if the products table requires more fields (not null) it would break at runtime. Existing products rows exist though; we need the schema of products. But other migration seeds probably do the same. Let me check Version20260519173602's product seeding. Search "INSERT INTO products".
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["migrations/*.php"], "search_text": "INSERT INTO products"}
Result
File: migrations/Version20251204000000.php
Match lines: 1
24| INSERT INTO products (name, slug, active)
File: migrations/Version20260308100000.php
Match lines: 1
53| INSERT INTO products (name, slug, active)
File: migrations/Version20260428153000_MetaHumanCommitteeAuditProduct.php
Match lines: 1
22| $this->addSql("INSERT INTO products (name, slug, active) SELECT 'MetaHuman — auditoria de comitês', 'metahuman-committee-audit', 1 WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM products WHERE slug = 'metahuman-committee-audit')");
File: migrations/Version20260428160000_MetaHumanStrategicActionsProduct.php
Match lines: 1
22| $this->addSql("INSERT INTO products (name, slug, active) SELECT 'MetaHuman — ações estratégicas (ficha)', 'metahuman-strategic-actions', 1 WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM products WHERE slug = 'metahuman-strategic-actions')");
File: migrations/Version20260430120000_MetaHumanStrategicActionsLegalProduct.php
Match lines: 1
22| $this->addSql("INSERT INTO products (name, slug, active) SELECT 'MetaHuman — ações estratégicas (jurídico/compliance)', 'metahuman-strategic-actions-legal', 1 WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM products WHERE slug = 'metahuman-strategic-actions-legal')");
File: migrations/Version20260508141500.php
Match lines: 8
180| $this->addSql("INSERT INTO products (name, slug, active) SELECT 'Pagáveis', 'pagaveis', 1 FROM DUAL WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM products WHERE slug = 'pagaveis')");
181| $this->addSql("INSERT INTO products (name, slug, active) SELECT 'Contas a Receber', 'contas-a-receber', 1 FROM DUAL WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM products WHERE slug = 'contas-a-receber')");
182| $this->addSql("INSERT INTO products (name, slug, active) SELECT 'Saldo em Caixa', 'saldo-caixa', 1 FROM DUAL WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM products WHERE slug = 'saldo-caixa')");
183| $this->addSql("INSERT INTO products (name, slug, active) SELECT 'Fornecedores', 'fornecedores', 1 FROM DUAL WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM products WHERE slug = 'fornecedores')");
184| $this->addSql("INSERT INTO products (name, slug, active) SELECT 'Centros de Custo', 'centros-de-custo', 1 FROM DUAL WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM products WHERE slug = 'centros-de-custo')");
185| $this->addSql("INSERT INTO products (name, slug, active) SELECT 'Orçamentos', 'orcamentos', 1 FROM DUAL WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM products WHERE slug = 'orcamentos')");
186| $this->addSql("INSERT INTO products (name, slug, active) SELECT 'Contas Bancárias', 'contas-bancarias', 1 FROM DUAL WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM products WHERE slug = 'contas-bancarias')");
187| $this->addSql("INSERT INTO products (name, slug, active) SELECT 'Reembolso', 'reembolso', 1 FROM DUAL WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM products WHERE slug = 'reembolso')");
File: migrations/Version20260513103000.php
Match lines: 1
23| $this->addSql("INSERT INTO products (name, slug, active) SELECT 'Hub Financeiro — Contas a Receber', 'contas-a-receber', 1 FROM DUAL WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM products WHERE slug = 'contas-a-receber')");
File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php
Match lines: 1
492| 'INSERT INTO products (name, active, slug) VALUES (:name, 1, :slug)',
File: migrations/Version20260519120000_MetaHumanCommitteeHubPermissionProducts.php
Match lines: 2
22| $this->addSql("INSERT INTO products (name, slug, active) SELECT 'MetaHuman — comités especializados', 'metahuman-specialized-committees', 1 WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM products WHERE slug = 'metahuman-specialized-committees')");
23| $this->addSql("INSERT INTO products (name, slug, active) SELECT 'MetaHuman — coaches com IA', 'metahuman-ai-coach', 1 WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM products WHERE slug = 'metahuman-ai-coach')");
File: migrations/Version20260519124600.php
Match lines: 1
120| INSERT INTO products (name, slug, active)
File: migrations/Version20260522191834.php
Match lines: 2
19| $this->addSql("INSERT INTO products (name, slug, active) VALUES ('Orquestrador de Operações', 'operation-orchestrator', 1)");
20| $this->addSql("INSERT INTO products (name, slug, active) VALUES ('Jornada Corporativa', 'corporative-journey', 1)");
File: migrations/Version20260608105200_ProcessDepartmentUpdate.php
Match lines: 1
21| $this->addSql("INSERT INTO products (name, slug, active) SELECT 'Áreas Profissionais', 'professional_areas', 1 FROM DUAL WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM products WHERE slug = 'professional_areas')");
File: migrations/Version20260723132439.php
Match lines: 1
23| INSERT INTO products (name, slug, active)
File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
Match lines: 1
137| 'INSERT INTO products (name, active, slug) VALUES (:name, 1, :slug)',
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["migrations/*.php"], "search_text": "ensureWorkflow|WORKFLOW_SLUG"}
Result
No matches found
Request #50
deepseek-v4-flash
P:92.54K C:848 CR:91.14K CW:0
8000ms
Reasoning
Products seeding consistent with other migrations. Not an issue.
Let me now look for how default offboarding flows previously seeded templates; do they also seed for all companies? Version20260519173602 is a similar template seed migration with per company loops (line 99 delete by templateId etc.). Let's check that migration to see how they determine which companies to seed, for the "offboarding" default. This might confirm the concern that other similar migrations scope by company product usage — in which case the new migration not scoping is a stronger finding, but #2 already covers that.
Anyway.
Now let's nail down new findings with good confidence:
Let me reconsider the service code for **unit test file** changed (tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php) outside review group — skip.
Let me now check for a real bug I spotted: In the migration the stage "Etapa 1 - Preparação" automation "Notificar responsável do fluxo" is `action_type='send_email_flow_responsible'` with actions[0]['type']='send_email'. But in the service map, 'send_email_flow_responsible' maps to executeSendEmail(merge to flow_responsible). The action config includes template offboarding_stage_enter. That means when the member enters stage 1, an e-mail is sent to the flow responsible using template offboarding_stage_enter. Fine — This is similar to existing default flows (DecisionSystemController seeds the same). So consistent.
Now let me look for a mismatch in the migration stage seeds vs the YAML default template used in UI: In YAML, "send_email_flow_responsible" belongs to notifications; but whatever.
### Potential real issue — stage order_index duplicates with existing stage seeds?
When up() runs for a company with an existing 'Fluxos de Saída' workflow, but no template with this seed key, it creates a new template. But there might already exist default offboarding templates for that workflow from earlier seeding, e.g., an existing template "Fluxo padrão offboarding" (template_category 'offboarding'). Then this migration would create a *second* default flow template "Offboarding com eSocial (S-2299)". Not necessarily a bug — intended feature? The user story says the template should be available; maybe desired even if existing default exists. Probably fine.
### Now think about issue: this migration seeds three fixed stages, each with 1 activity "Offboarding"; the automation `create_processo_seletivo` in stage 3 requires `offboarding_completed` trigger; and the stage 2 automation on_all_activities_complete moves forward. But each stage also creates a default activity named "Offboarding". What does 'activity_type' = 'activity' mean in offboarding context? In offboarding, an activity is a checklist item; but with type 'activity' and no template id. Hmm. For flow template stages, activities are usually seeded as templates that get instantiated as tasks with references to OffboardingActivityType etc. Wait — 'activity_type' with value 'activity' maybe indicates a free activity with just name & config icon. When instantiated in an offboarding, the activity would presumably be created as the actual checklist item "Offboarding". This is how other flow templates do it? Let me search seeds for flow_activities inserts in migrations.
Search migrations for "INSERT INTO flow_activities".
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["migrations/*.php"], "search_text": "INSERT INTO flow_activities"}
Result
File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php Match lines: 1 391| 'INSERT INTO flow_activities (flow_stage_id, name, activity_type, config, order_index, process_stage_type, onboarding_activity_type_id, offboarding_activity_type_id)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "function replaceVariables"}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 2 13316| private function replaceVariables(string $text, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): string 13550| private function replaceVariablesInArray(array $data, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
Request #51
deepseek-v4-flash
P:93.55K C:207 CR:93.31K CW:0
3060ms
Reasoning
Only this new migration inserts into flow_activities. That's a sign that previous seeds didn't insert activities into flow templates (maybe flows create activities automatically on instantiation, meaning inserting "Offboarding" activity rows into template stages might be wrong/nonstandard). Hmm. But no direct comparator. It may be required though because flow_stages with fixed type need activities? In this domain, flow template stages have flow_activities? Let me search for what creates flow_activities in general — maybe there's a service FlowTemplateSeeder that seeds default offboarding templates; search code for "flow_activities" inserts across src (non migration).
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "INSERT INTO flow_activities|new FlowActivity|flow_activities", "use_perl_regexp": true}
Result
File: config/routes_decision_system.yaml
Match lines: 1
613|api_workflow_activities_by_product:
File: docs/Flowable/COMO_CONFIGURAR_PROCESS_STAGE_TYPE.md
Match lines: 2
186|4. **Verificar no banco**: Consulte a tabela `flow_activities` e verifique se o campo `process_stage_type` está preenchido:
195|FROM flow_activities fa
File: docs/Flowable/DESIGN_ENTIDADES_WORKFLOW.md
Match lines: 1
302|$activity = new FlowActivity();
File: docs/Flowable/Workflow_Onboarding_Criacao_Instancia.md
Match lines: 1
111|flow_activities
File: docs/IMPLEMENTACAO_SALVAR_ETAPAS_PADRAO.md
Match lines: 1
204|SELECT fa.* FROM flow_activities fa
File: docs/database-changes/2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template.md
Match lines: 1
58|O `DOWN` remove apenas templates marcados com `settings.seed_migration = 20260901171000_offboarding_esocial_s2299_flow_template` e seus registros dependentes em `flow_automations`, `flow_activities`, `flow_stages` e `flow_template_products`.
File: docs/engineering/pr/homolog/PR_commits_homolog.txt
Match lines: 1
3634|08204d094d fix(mig): adiciona CREATE flow_activities e DROP completo no down da Version20260318120000
File: docs/offboarding-multiple-types-IMPLEMENTED.md
Match lines: 1
260|ALTER TABLE flow_activities
File: migration_archive_20260508/Version20260106181323.php
Match lines: 9
14| * - Version20251219202630: Campo process_stage_type em flow_activities
136| // 5. Tabela flow_activities (atividades das etapas - com process_stage_type)
137| if (!$this->tableExists('flow_activities')) {
139| CREATE TABLE flow_activities (
230| $this->dropForeignKeyIfExists('flow_activities', 'FK_FLOW_ACTIVITY_STAGE');
231| if ($this->tableExists('flow_activities') && $this->tableExists('flow_stages') && !$this->foreignKeyExists('flow_activities', 'FK_FLOW_ACTIVITY_STAGE')) {
232| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE flow_activities ADD CONSTRAINT FK_FLOW_ACTIVITY_STAGE FOREIGN KEY (flow_stage_id) REFERENCES flow_stages (id) ON DELETE CASCADE');
506| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE flow_activities DROP FOREIGN KEY FK_FLOW_ACTIVITY_STAGE');
526| $this->addSql('DROP TABLE flow_activities');
File: migration_archive_20260508/Version20260305140000.php
Match lines: 15
12| * - flow_activities: onboarding_activity_type_id, offboarding_activity_type_id
27| // flow_activities: onboarding_activity_type_id, offboarding_activity_type_id
28| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE flow_activities ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS onboarding_activity_type_id INT DEFAULT NULL');
29| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE flow_activities ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS offboarding_activity_type_id INT DEFAULT NULL');
30| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE flow_activities DROP FOREIGN KEY IF EXISTS FK_FLOW_ACTIVITY_ONBOARDING_TYPE');
31| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE flow_activities ADD CONSTRAINT FK_FLOW_ACTIVITY_ONBOARDING_TYPE FOREIGN KEY (onboarding_activity_type_id) REFERENCES type_activity (id) ON DELETE SET NULL');
32| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE flow_activities DROP FOREIGN KEY IF EXISTS FK_FLOW_ACTIVITY_OFFBOARDING_TYPE');
33| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE flow_activities ADD CONSTRAINT FK_FLOW_ACTIVITY_OFFBOARDING_TYPE FOREIGN KEY (offboarding_activity_type_id) REFERENCES offboarding_type_activity (id) ON DELETE SET NULL');
153| // flow_activities
154| $exists = $conn->fetchOne("SELECT 1 FROM information_schema.COLUMNS WHERE TABLE_SCHEMA = DATABASE() AND TABLE_NAME = 'flow_activities' AND COLUMN_NAME = 'onboarding_activity_type_id'");
156| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE flow_activities DROP FOREIGN KEY FK_FLOW_ACTIVITY_ONBOARDING_TYPE');
157| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE flow_activities DROP COLUMN onboarding_activity_type_id');
159| $exists = $conn->fetchOne("SELECT 1 FROM information_schema.COLUMNS WHERE TABLE_SCHEMA = DATABASE() AND TABLE_NAME = 'flow_activities' AND COLUMN_NAME = 'offboarding_activity_type_id'");
161| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE flow_activities DROP FOREIGN KEY FK_FLOW_ACTIVITY_OFFBOARDING_TYPE');
162| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE flow_activities DROP COLUMN offboarding_activity_type_id');
File: migration_archive_20260508/Version20260318120000.php
Match lines: 11
113| CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS flow_activities (
223| $this->tableExists('flow_activities')
225| && !$this->foreignKeyExists('flow_activities', 'FK_FLOW_ACTIVITY_STAGE')
227| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE flow_activities ADD CONSTRAINT FK_FLOW_ACTIVITY_STAGE FOREIGN KEY (flow_stage_id) REFERENCES flow_stages (id) ON DELETE CASCADE');
237| $this->tableExists('flow_activities')
239| && !$this->foreignKeyExists('flow_activities', 'FK_FLOW_ACTIVITY_ONBOARDING_TYPE')
241| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE flow_activities ADD CONSTRAINT FK_FLOW_ACTIVITY_ONBOARDING_TYPE FOREIGN KEY (onboarding_activity_type_id) REFERENCES type_activity (id) ON DELETE SET NULL');
244| $this->tableExists('flow_activities')
246| && !$this->foreignKeyExists('flow_activities', 'FK_FLOW_ACTIVITY_OFFBOARDING_TYPE')
248| $this->addSql('ALTER TABLE flow_activities ADD CONSTRAINT FK_FLOW_ACTIVITY_OFFBOARDING_TYPE FOREIGN KEY (offboarding_activity_type_id) REFERENCES offboarding_type_activity (id) ON DELETE SET NULL');
365| $this->addSql('DROP TABLE IF EXISTS flow_activities');
File: migrations/Version20260518151423.php
Match lines: 4
136| // -- flow_activities --------------------------------------------------
137| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_activities ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS process_stage_type INT DEFAULT NULL');
138| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_activities ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS onboarding_activity_type_id INT DEFAULT NULL');
139| $c->executeStatement('ALTER TABLE flow_activities ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS offboarding_activity_type_id INT DEFAULT NULL');
File: migrations/Version20260519203024.php
Match lines: 2
152| if ($this->tableExists('flow_activities')) {
154| "DELETE fact FROM flow_activities fact
File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php
Match lines: 5
28| foreach (['company', 'products', 'workflows', 'workflow_products', 'flow_templates', 'flow_template_products', 'flow_stages', 'flow_activities', 'flow_automations'] as $table) {
90| if ($this->tableExists('flow_activities')) {
92| 'DELETE fact FROM flow_activities fact
382| 'SELECT id FROM flow_activities WHERE flow_stage_id = :stageId AND name = :name LIMIT 1',
391| 'INSERT INTO flow_activities (flow_stage_id, name, activity_type, config, order_index, process_stage_type, onboarding_activity_type_id, offboarding_activity_type_id)
File: src/Controller/BpmTemplateController.php
Match lines: 1
387| $act = new FlowActivity();
File: src/Controller/CognitiveAssessmentController.php
Match lines: 2
498| * Para processos variaveis: as atividades NAO existem como flow_activities.
795| * - Nao existem flow_activities nas flow_stages
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystem/FlowTemplateController.php
Match lines: 5
1924| $activity = new FlowActivity();
3334| $activity1 = new FlowActivity();
3378| $activity2 = new FlowActivity();
3422| $activity3 = new FlowActivity();
4071| $activity = new FlowActivity();
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystemController.php
Match lines: 5
3694| $activity = new FlowActivity();
4628| $activity1 = new FlowActivity();
4672| $activity2 = new FlowActivity();
4716| $activity3 = new FlowActivity();
11957| $activity = new FlowActivity();
File: src/Entity/FlowActivity.php
Match lines: 1
13| * @ORM\Table(name="flow_activities")
File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowActivitySuggestionService.php
Match lines: 4
15| * Per-request cache of the activity catalog derived from flow_activities,
452| $activity = new FlowActivity();
580| // 1) the activities actually used in the BPM (derived from flow_activities),
661| * Builds the activity catalog of a product from the real flow_activities
File: src/Service/Adriana/WorkflowPlanApplierService.php
Match lines: 1
358| $activity = new FlowActivity();
File: src/Service/ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier.php
Match lines: 1
539| $activity = new FlowActivity();
File: tests/Controller/WorkflowApiTest.php
Match lines: 1
218| $activity = new FlowActivity();
Request #52
deepseek-v4-flash
P:96.06K C:2.45K CR:93.7K CW:0
18876ms
Reasoning
The docs file docs/database-changes/2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template.md exists (this PR added it per background). Not in review_files.
OK — given the number of confirmed findings, I need to be cautious not to duplicate. Let me now decide on final new findings.
Let me review the new service code once more focusing on how it gets invoked when the automation is executed (an important check for correctness/order):
Automations are run with some signature; executeAction($type, $config, $member, $context). The map includes 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' with `$config` being the action config. The migration seeded action config for this automation:
```
actionConfig: {
'to': 'flow_responsible',
'_default_automation_id': 'offboarding_esocial_s2299_draft_on_final_stage_enter',
}
```
When executing, `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft($config...)` reads config['to']? No. It only reads specific keys for payload, and responsible resolution ignores 'to'. The seeded config with 'to' => 'flow_responsible' is used by... nothing in this method except being passed through to executeNotify? Actually no: The method passes to executeNotify its own config. The automation config 'to' is not used. So the seeded `actionConfig` 'to' is basically dead in this context (unless the UI displays it). Not harmful.
**Wait — important**: The automation trigger execution mechanism — does it pass the member entering the stage and only the automation config, or also entire context with action-specific configs? The method uses config for payload but the config doesn't include dismissal info. Given the automation will run when member enters final stage (config has no payload), all fields are empty → the draft will be created with empty motivo etc. (pending draft to be filled by the responsible in UI). That's exactly the intent: "rascunho" for the responsible to review/pre-fill.
So main real problem is the subsequent overwrite of any filled values — #4.
Now I'm fairly convinced additional issues are limited. But let me look for bugs in the areas of the migration down() we haven't confirmed yet, e.g., flow_instances referencing the template's *stages* via flow_stages... If a flow instance was created from the template, then flow_instance_members/current_stage may reference flow_stages, and down deletes those stages (which would cascade to more rows or cause FK errors instead of cascade if flow_instance_members.flow_stage_id FK references restrict). If FK on flow_instance_members → flow_stages has ON DELETE RESTRICT, the delete of stages would fail with FK constraint error during migration rollback. In the migration down, deletion of `flow_stages` where flow_template_id = X would be blocked if flow_instance_members reference them with RESTRICT/NO ACTION. But whether instances can be created referencing those template stages... Flow instances typically copy template stages into flow_stages? Actually, when a flow instance is created from a template, does it copy stage rows to new flow_stages rows with flow_template_id still pointing to template? If flow_stages.flow_template_id references template and flow_instance references those same stage rows, then deleting would either cascade or error. Confirmed finding #1 said "flow_instances.flow_template_id tem FK com ON DELETE CASCADE — reverter ... apaga as instâncias/processos em andamento". That covers the main point about instance deletion cascading. So down() deleting stages and template also deletes instances. Enough.
I think the confirmed list is exhaustive for this diff's migration & service.
Let me now scan for remaining NEW issues in the yaml:
**YAML potential new issue:** For a YAML-driven UI, action `create_esocial_s2299_draft` with `has_config: false` also provides `config_preset: to: flow_responsible`. Config presets are probably defaults applied when an automation action is created; they're not presented as configurable. Fine, consistent with other actions.
**YAML misspelling check:** keys in new block: 'id', 'type', 'title', 'icon', 'has_config', 'allowed_triggers', 'blocked_triggers', 'blocked_trigger_message', 'description', 'config_preset' — all match other entries.
Now the list_automations.html.twig and flow_detail.html.twig changes are just two one-line mapping additions. These are inside `function getActionLabel` and `computeAutomationDisplayName`. Both are consistent. But note: in list_automations.html.twig the mapping added after 'request_notification'. In flow_detail.html.twig, mapping after 'stage_change_previous'. Fine.
Wait, is there a need to add mapping in both places for `create_processo_seletivo`? These two already include? Not relevant.
Let me consider whether there's a UI mapping for the action in `new_automation.html.twig` (where actions are listed for creation) missing — the new action type 'create_esocial_s2299_draft' may need to be registered in the automation builder JS so users can add this action to their flows. Let me search in decision_system automation templates for 'create_processo_seletivo' mapping to see if new action should be added to new_automation.html.twig. But that template is not in review_files; can't comment outside? Rules: "Your comments must address code within <review_files> — never produce comments targeting files outside it." So I can only comment on the review files. Cross-file observation: the diff added the label to list_automations and flow_detail but not new_automation — but new_automation wasn't changed in this PR. Could be intentionally a pre-seeded action (from migration) not intended to be user-selectable in the UI? Actually the offboarding.yaml config with the new action suggests it IS meant to be user-selectable through the orchestrator. Yet the new_automation.html.twig may build its list from YAML rather than hard-coded JS; can't confirm. Given the uncertain relevance and being out of scope, skip.
OK.
Let me determine whether there is a NEW real issue about the migration **ordering of down()**: It deletes flow_template_products before flow_templates; fine. Also, down deletes templates for *all companies* that have that seed. Note: after down() runs, the workflow remains with product. If later someone runs up() again... not typical.
Let me now consider the **`ensureProduct` inside up() forcing active=1 even when product was intentionally disabled** — part of #2.
**Product name update only when null** - trivial.
**A subtle migration bug: The `up()` early-returns if any of the listed tables doesn't exist** — including `flow_activities`/`flow_automations`, which are probably only relevant to the new orchestration; if a database lacks these tables (maybe a multi-tenant with older schema where automations aren't used), then migration silently succeeds (no-op) — data loss none. When migrations then mark as executed, later if tables get created, this seed never runs again. That's a silent-skip risk. But migrations run sequentially on same schema; not a big concern for this repo. And other similar seeds follow same pattern (checking table existence). Skip.
Let me now look for issues in **the `try/catch` log with 'warning'** in `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft` — the log includes member ids only. Fine.
Let me consider security angle in the new automation: the config could contain arbitrary payload keys to fill eSocial fields. Since action configs are editable by company managers in the flow builder (could include free text for e.g., numeroProcesso), this is written to DB fields of the event (which is a draft); no XSS risk. Fine.
Now I want to nail down 1-3 NEW comments with decent confidence to add value, without duplicating the 7 confirmed.
Candidate new findings:
**N1. Migration seeds `create_processo_seletivo` automation ("Criar Processo Seletivo ao concluir offboarding") into the "default" eSocial offboarding flow, an unrelated behavior (backfill recruitment).** This side effect is outside the PR scope described (create eSocial S-2299 draft). Wait, is that action part of a pre-existing pattern? The YAML has `create_processo_seletivo` in offboarding.yaml under recruitment category — meaning this is an existing offboarding action used in default flows elsewhere. Indeed the action type existed before (create_processo_seletivo => executeCreateProcessoSeletivo existed before this diff at 14924). And flow_detail/list_automations labels already included 'create_processo_seletivo' mapping earlier (in file diff context they had `create_processo_seletivo` label? Let's check: In flow_detail, the mapping we see includes 'create_processo_seletivo' already? In diff context we only saw added line. Hmm — before the new line, we don't see create_processo_seletivo mapping. Let me check the full mapping list in flow_detail to see if create_processo_seletivo existed. Not necessary.
Actually, including "Criar Processo Seletivo" in the default eSocial offboarding flow template as a seeded default is a genuine business-behavior change: each completed offboarding automatically creates a recruitment process (with cargo/department copied, etc.). But the PR goal is about S-2299 draft creation; seeding a default flow with a side effect of creating recruitment process for every employee termination at every tenant is a real risk — out of scope and not documented in the PR description. The template description says "Flow padrão de offboarding com etapas customizáveis e criação do rascunho eSocial S-2299 na etapa final." It doesn't mention auto-creating recruitment processes. Hmm but it might be intended to be consistent with default offboarding flows already having create_processo_seletivo (see YAML recruitment). Wait, but those default flows are not seeded in this migration (this migration creates the whole template from scratch, so whatever is seeded IS the flow). So the template seeded by this migration automatically creates a "Processo Seletivo" for the replacement vacancy when offboarding completes. That behavior is likely derived from standard default offboarding template in the product (also seeded elsewhere via WorkflowOrchestratorBuiltinStages? Let's check DecisionSystemController's built-in seed of offboarding template to see whether create_processo_seletivo is included in the standard default offboarding template. If yes, then consistent.
Let me search DecisionSystemController/WorkflowOrchestratorBuiltinStages for the default offboarding template creation with actions and create_processo_seletivo. Actually line 5493 in DecisionSystemController seeds actionType 'send_email_flow_responsible'. Let's look at that context to see a similar built-in template and what automations include.
Let me read DecisionSystemController around 5400-5600.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 5620, "file_path": "src/Controller/DecisionSystemController.php", "start_line": 5400}
Result
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystemController.php (Total lines: 25402)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 5400-5620
5400| 'type' => 'activity', // Tipo genérico para indicar que é placeholder
5401| 'icon' => 'fa-regular fa-file-lines',
5402| ],
5403| 'defaultAutomations' => [
5404| [
5405| 'name' => 'Quando colaborador entrar nesta etapa, enviar e-mail para responsável do fluxo',
5406| 'triggerType' => 'on_enter',
5407| 'actionType' => 'send_email',
5408| 'actionConfig' => [
5409| 'to' => 'flow_responsible',
5410| 'template' => 'onboarding-on_enter-flow_responsible',
5411| 'value' => 'onboarding-on_enter-flow_responsible',
5412| 'label' => 'Onboarding - Entrada na Etapa (Responsável)',
5413| ],
5414| 'conditions' => [
5415| ['type' => 'on_enter', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0],
5416| ],
5417| 'actions' => [
5418| ['type' => 'send_email', 'config' => [
5419| 'to' => 'flow_responsible',
5420| 'email_template' => 'onboarding-on_enter-flow_responsible',
5421| 'value' => 'onboarding-on_enter-flow_responsible',
5422| 'label' => 'Onboarding - Entrada na Etapa (Responsável)',
5423| 'template' => 'onboarding-on_enter-flow_responsible',
5424| ], 'orderIndex' => 0],
5425| ],
5426| ],
5427| ],
5428| 'advanceRules' => [],
5429| ],
5430| [
5431| 'id' => 'etapa-3',
5432| 'name' => 'Etapa 3',
5433| 'description' => 'Etapa de acompanhamento e avaliação da adaptação do colaborador.',
5434| 'orderIndex' => 3,
5435| 'editable' => true,
5436| 'defaultActivity' => [
5437| 'name' => 'Onboarding',
5438| 'type' => 'activity', // Tipo genérico para indicar que é placeholder
5439| 'icon' => 'fa-regular fa-file-lines',
5440| ],
5441| 'defaultAutomations' => [
5442| [
5443| 'name' => 'Quando colaborador finalizar todas as atividades, notificar colaborador',
5444| 'triggerType' => 'on_all_activities_complete',
5445| 'actionType' => 'notification',
5446| 'actionConfig' => [
5447| 'to' => 'employee',
5448| ],
5449| 'conditions' => [
5450| ['type' => 'on_all_activities_complete', 'config' => ['percentage' => 100], 'orderIndex' => 0],
5451| ],
5452| 'actions' => [
5453| ['type' => 'notification', 'config' => [
5454| 'to' => 'employee',
5455| ], 'orderIndex' => 0],
5456| ],
5457| ],
5458| ],
5459| 'advanceRules' => [],
5460| ],
5461| ];
5462| }
5463|
5464| /**
5465| * Retorna os templates do Offboarding separados por tipos (variável e fixo)
5466| */
5467| /**
5468| * Retorna os templates do Offboarding separados por tipos (variável e fixo)
5469| *
5470| * REGRA DE DIVISÃO DE ETAPAS VARIÁVEIS:
5471| * - Se o offboarding tem apenas 1 etapa: colaborador vai direto para "Etapa Final"
5472| * - Se o offboarding tem N etapas (N > 1): etapas 1 a N-1 ficam em "Etapa Intermediária", etapa N fica em "Etapa Final"
5473| */
5474| private function getOffboardingTemplates(): array
5475| {
5476| return [
5477| 'variavel' => [
5478| [
5479| 'id' => 'etapa-intermediaria-offboarding',
5480| 'name' => 'Etapa Intermediária',
5481| 'description' => 'Etapa intermediária vinculada ao offboarding. Contém as primeiras etapas do offboarding (exceto a última). Se o offboarding tiver apenas 1 etapa, o colaborador vai direto para a Etapa Final.',
5482| 'orderIndex' => 1,
5483| 'editable' => true,
5484| 'isIntermediateStage' => true,
5485| 'isFinalStage' => false,
5486| 'stageType' => 'intermediaria',
5487| 'isFixed' => false,
5488| 'isVariable' => true,
5489| 'defaultAutomations' => [
5490| [
5491| 'name' => 'Notificar responsável do fluxo',
5492| 'triggerType' => 'on_enter',
5493| 'actionType' => 'send_email_flow_responsible',
5494| 'actionConfig' => [
5495| 'to' => 'flow_responsible',
5496| 'template' => 'offboarding_stage_enter',
5497| ],
5498| 'conditions' => [
5499| ['type' => 'on_enter', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0],
5500| ],
5501| 'actions' => [
5502| ['type' => 'send_email', 'config' => ['to' => 'flow_responsible', 'template' => 'offboarding_stage_enter'], 'orderIndex' => 0],
5503| ],
5504| ],
5505| ],
5506| 'advanceRules' => [
5507| [
5508| 'name' => 'Avançar quando concluída etapa do offboarding',
5509| 'type' => 'advance',
5510| ],
5511| ],
5512| ],
5513| [
5514| 'id' => 'etapa-final-offboarding',
5515| 'name' => 'Etapa Final',
5516| 'description' => 'Etapa final vinculada ao offboarding. Contém a última etapa do offboarding. Se o offboarding tiver apenas 1 etapa, o colaborador entra diretamente aqui.',
5517| 'orderIndex' => 2,
5518| 'editable' => true,
5519| 'isIntermediateStage' => false,
5520| 'isFinalStage' => true,
5521| 'stageType' => 'final',
5522| 'isFixed' => false,
5523| 'isVariable' => true,
5524| 'defaultAutomations' => [
5525| [
5526| 'name' => 'Criar Processo Seletivo ao concluir offboarding',
5527| 'triggerType' => 'on_offboarding_complete',
5528| 'actionType' => 'create_processo_seletivo',
5529| 'actionConfig' => [],
5530| 'conditions' => [
5531| ['type' => 'on_offboarding_complete', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0],
5532| ],
5533| 'actions' => [
5534| ['type' => 'create_processo_seletivo', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0],
5535| ],
5536| ],
5537| ],
5538| 'advanceRules' => [],
5539| ],
5540| ],
5541| 'fixo' => [
5542| // Fixo não tem etapa intermediária - usa as 3 etapas padrão
5543| ],
5544| ];
5545| }
5546|
5547| /**
5548| * Retorna as etapas padrão do Offboarding
5549| * 3 etapas fixas que fazem parte do processo de desligamento do colaborador
5550| */
5551| private function getOffboardingStages(): array
5552| {
5553| return [
5554| [
5555| 'id' => 'etapa-1',
5556| 'name' => 'Etapa 1 - Preparação',
5557| 'description' => 'Etapa inicial de preparação do desligamento com comunicações e documentação necessária.',
5558| 'orderIndex' => 1,
5559| 'editable' => true,
5560| 'defaultActivity' => [
5561| 'name' => 'Offboarding',
5562| 'type' => 'activity',
5563| 'icon' => 'fa-regular fa-file-lines',
5564| ],
5565| 'defaultAutomations' => [
5566| [
5567| 'name' => 'Notificar responsável do fluxo',
5568| 'triggerType' => 'on_enter',
5569| 'actionType' => 'send_email_flow_responsible',
5570| 'actionConfig' => [
5571| 'to' => 'flow_responsible',
5572| 'template' => 'offboarding_stage_enter',
5573| ],
5574| 'conditions' => [
5575| ['type' => 'on_enter', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0],
5576| ],
5577| 'actions' => [
5578| ['type' => 'send_email', 'config' => ['to' => 'flow_responsible', 'template' => 'offboarding_stage_enter'], 'orderIndex' => 0],
5579| ],
5580| ],
5581| ],
5582| 'advanceRules' => [],
5583| ],
5584| [
5585| 'id' => 'etapa-2',
5586| 'name' => 'Etapa 2 - Transição',
5587| 'description' => 'Etapa de transição de responsabilidades e devolução de equipamentos.',
5588| 'orderIndex' => 2,
5589| 'editable' => true,
5590| 'defaultActivity' => [
5591| 'name' => 'Offboarding',
5592| 'type' => 'activity',
5593| 'icon' => 'fa-regular fa-file-lines',
5594| ],
5595| 'defaultAutomations' => [
5596| [
5597| 'name' => 'Avançar ao concluir 100% das atividades',
5598| 'triggerType' => 'on_all_activities_complete',
5599| 'actionType' => 'stage_change',
5600| 'actionConfig' => [],
5601| 'conditions' => [
5602| ['type' => 'on_all_activities_complete', 'config' => ['value' => 100], 'orderIndex' => 0],
5603| ],
5604| 'actions' => [
5605| ['type' => 'stage_change', 'config' => [], 'orderIndex' => 0],
5606| ],
5607| ],
5608| ],
5609| 'advanceRules' => [],
5610| ],
5611| [
5612| 'id' => 'etapa-3',
5613| 'name' => 'Etapa 3 - Finalização',
5614| 'description' => 'Etapa de finalização com entrevista de desligamento e procedimentos finais.',
5615| 'orderIndex' => 3,
5616| 'editable' => true,
5617| 'defaultActivity' => [
5618| 'name' => 'Offboarding',
5619| 'type' => 'activity',
5620| 'icon' => 'fa-regular fa-file-lines',
Request #53
deepseek-v4-flash
P:101.34K C:1.27K CR:98.43K CW:0
10577ms
Reasoning
This confirms the migration's seeded automations/stages mirror existing standard offboarding fixed templates in DecisionSystemController (Etapa 1-3, send_email_flow_responsible on enter, stage_change on all activities complete, create_processo_seletivo on offboarding_complete). So the create_processo_seletivo part is consistent with standard defaults; not an issue. And the stage 3 description adds eSocial text but create_processo_seletivo still included. The standard "Etapa 3 - Finalização" default (in the controller) also has 'Criar Processo Seletivo ao concluir offboarding' presumably. So consistent.
So migration basically replicates existing defaults + adds new S-2299 automation in stage 3. This is a pre-existing pattern.
Given the above, I have to be careful to not manufacture speculative findings. But the instruction says review every file individually and look for NEW issues. Let me consider potential issues in files not yet given comments: config YAML, the two twig files, migration (already has comments), service (already has comments).
The remaining plausible NEW findings:
### For the template fix file:
The fix is good. But look at the value for process number uses `prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab` - but this template is `motivo_desligamento.html.twig` in "termino" guides directory. Since other options above already use prevEvts.termino consistently, this change aligns. No issue.
### flow_detail.html.twig & list_automations.html.twig:
Mappings added for the new action. They are inside JS maps keyed by action type. The new action type is 'create_esocial_s2299_draft'. Consistent.
### YAML: The new action block under `movement` seems odd but it's for UI classification; no spell issues. However, is there a risk the front end derives action's allowed category from group, and if a movement action, the flow builder will list it as a movement action that can be combined with the blocked triggers etc. The blocked_triggers explicitly restrict. Good.
Given no NEW high-confidence issues in YAML/twigs, I could pass.
But wait — let me double-check one important thing: the new action in the migration seeds the S-2299 automation at "Etapa 3 - Finalização" with `triggerType: on_enter` and actionConfig `to: flow_responsible`. When this automation executes for the member entering the final stage, the offboarding may not yet have dismissal date. Actually `getDismissalDate()` probably equals the member's dismissal (registered when the offboarding is initiated). Actually since final stage entry is near completion, dismissal date should be available. OK.
One more angle: **the payload builds `dataDesligamento` from `getDismissalDate() ?? getRequestedAt()`; and `getRequestedAt`** is probably when the offboarding for this employee was requested (start), not the termination date. In the eSocial event, dataDesligamento should be the last worked day. Using requestedAt fallback would fill a wrong date in a draft that the responsible must review/correct; the notification prompts them to review. Not a data-integrity issue since draft. skip.
Let me also confirm whether the S-2299 automation dispatch key placed within the code's executeAction map is in the right switch statement where `$type` could equal the action_type from DB; yes map key names equal DB action_type (as used for create_processo_seletivo etc.). Good.
Let me look at any remaining subtle thing: The new method uses fully-qualified `\App\Entity\OffboardingMember` as parameter type in method signature (resolveEsocialS2299Responsible and buildEsocialS2299DraftPayload) — OffboardingMember not imported at top? The file already has many `use App\Entity\...`. In the diff, only EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento import added. FQCN used inline to avoid import. Works.
**Now — potential NEW real issue about `NotificationSpecialist` message HTML and link**: requirement says "sem expor link cru no texto" and "botão ver detalhes direciona para chat com a Adriana". Here `message` (plain) has no URL (good). `message_html` still contains a direct link to the member manage page; but html is used only in email body, not chat. Chat message comes via executeSendEmail? Wait — the chat message is sent with `fullMessage = title + message`, where message is plain text no URL. Good.
But wait — the flow of executeNotify: emailConfig contains body = messageHtml which contains direct URL; executeSendEmail sends chat message... In executeSendEmail, the chat body might use `$emailTemplateBody`? If chat message uses the HTML or a plain version derived from body, then the Adriana chat might still contain HTML link or raw URL? Let me check executeSendEmail to see what the chat message includes (it might just send the same message as chat text, possibly containing the HTML anchor). If the chat message in the assistant conversation includes the html link as text, the requirement of "not raw URL in text" may be violated but not harmful.
Actually maybe the assistant conversation could render message as text with the raw HTML tags visible if not rendered. Let me check executeSendEmail's chat handling at 13700-13840. Let me read 13700-13840 to see the chat message creation for chat 'from executeSendEmail'.
I've already used a lot of reads; let's quickly read that region.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 13840, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 13630}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15468)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 13630-13840
13630| $htmlTemplate = preg_replace('/\{\{\s*candidato\s*\}\}/', '{{ candidato_nome }}', $htmlTemplate);
13631| $htmlTemplate = preg_replace('/\{\{\s*avaliaco\.processo\s*\}\}/', '{{ processName }}', $htmlTemplate);
13632| $htmlTemplate = preg_replace('/\{%\s*if\s+avaliaco\s*%\}/', '{% if processName %}', $htmlTemplate);
13633| $htmlTemplate = preg_replace('/\{\{\s*avaliaco\s*\}\}/', '{{ processName }}', $htmlTemplate);
13634| $htmlTemplate = preg_replace('/\{\{\s*avaliador\.primeironome\s*\}\}/', '{{ avaliador_primeironome }}', $htmlTemplate);
13635| $htmlTemplate = preg_replace('/\{\{\s*avaliador\.ultimonome\s*\}\}/', '{{ avaliador_ultimonome }}', $htmlTemplate);
13636| $htmlTemplate = preg_replace('/\{\{\s*avaliador\.email\s*\}\}/', '{{ avaliador_email }}', $htmlTemplate);
13637| $htmlTemplate = preg_replace('/\{%\s*if\s+avaliador\s*%\}/', '{% if avaliador_primeironome %}', $htmlTemplate);
13638| $htmlTemplate = preg_replace('/\{\{\s*avaliador\s*\}\}/', '{{ avaliador_primeironome }}', $htmlTemplate);
13639|
13640| // Limpar objetos stdClass dos values
13641| $values['registro'] = '';
13642| $values['candidato'] = '';
13643| $values['avaliaco'] = '';
13644| $values['avaliador'] = '';
13645|
13646| if (isset($values['message'])) {
13647| $values['message'] = new \Twig\Markup($values['message'], 'UTF-8');
13648| }
13649|
13650| // Substituir {{message}} por {{message|raw}}
13651| $htmlTemplate = str_replace('{{message}}', '{{message|raw}}', $htmlTemplate);
13652|
13653| // Renderizar via Twig
13654| if ($this->twig) {
13655| $renderedHtml = $this->twig->createTemplate($htmlTemplate)->render($values);
13656| } else {
13657| // Fallback: substituição manual de variáveis simples
13658| $renderedHtml = $htmlTemplate;
13659| foreach ($values as $key => $val) {
13660| if (is_string($val) || is_numeric($val)) {
13661| $renderedHtml = str_replace('{{ ' . $key . ' }}', (string)$val, $renderedHtml);
13662| $renderedHtml = str_replace('{{' . $key . '}}', (string)$val, $renderedHtml);
13663| }
13664| }
13665| }
13666|
13667| // Converter HTML para texto limpo para o chat
13668| // Preservar links <a> como "Label: URL" antes de strip_tags
13669| $renderedHtml = preg_replace_callback(
13670| '/<a\s[^>]*href=["\']([^"\']+)["\'][^>]*>(.*?)<\/a>/is',
13671| function ($m) {
13672| $url = trim($m[1]);
13673| $label = trim(strip_tags($m[2]));
13674| if ($label === '' || $label === $url) {
13675| return $url;
13676| }
13677| return $label . ': ' . $url;
13678| },
13679| $renderedHtml
13680| );
13681| // Manter quebras de linha com <br> e <p>
13682| $text = preg_replace('/<br\s*\/?>/i', "\n", $renderedHtml);
13683| $text = preg_replace('/<\/p>/i', "\n\n", $text);
13684| $text = preg_replace('/<\/div>/i', "\n", $text);
13685| $text = preg_replace('/<\/li>/i', "\n", $text);
13686| $text = strip_tags($text);
13687| $text = html_entity_decode($text, ENT_QUOTES | ENT_HTML5, 'UTF-8');
13688| // Limpar espaços excessivos mas manter quebras de linha
13689| $text = preg_replace('/[ \t]+/', ' ', $text);
13690| $text = preg_replace('/\n\s+\n/', "\n\n", $text);
13691| $text = trim($text);
13692|
13693| return $text;
13694|
13695| } catch (\Exception $e) {
13696| error_log("[renderEmailTemplateBody] Erro: " . $e->getMessage());
13697| return '';
13698| }
13699| }
13700|
13701| /**
13702| * Creates a canonical chat message for BPM request notifications.
13703| * Keeps parity with the email content and guarantees decision links are present.
13704| */
13705| private function buildRequestNotificationChatBody(array $values, array $config, string $fallbackBody = ''): string
13706| {
13707| $title = trim((string) ($values['title'] ?? $config['title'] ?? 'Solicitação para Aprovação'));
13708| $requestTypeLabel = trim((string) ($values['request_type_label'] ?? $config['request_type_label'] ?? 'Solicitação'));
13709| $message = trim((string) ($values['message'] ?? $config['message'] ?? 'Uma solicitação foi criada.'));
13710| $recordName = trim((string) ($values['record_name'] ?? $values['memberName'] ?? $config['record_name'] ?? 'colaborador'));
13711| $companyName = trim((string) ($values['companyName'] ?? $values['company_name'] ?? ''));
13712| $approveText = trim((string) ($config['approve_button_text'] ?? 'Aprovar solicitação'));
13713| $rejectText = trim((string) ($config['reject_button_text'] ?? 'Rejeitar solicitação'));
13714| $approveUrl = trim((string) ($config['approve_url'] ?? ''));
13715| $rejectUrl = trim((string) ($config['reject_url'] ?? ''));
13716|
13717| $lines = [];
13718| $lines[] = 'Olá,';
13719| $lines[] = '';
13720| $lines[] = 'Você recebeu uma nova solicitação relacionada ao colaborador ' . $recordName . '.';
13721| $lines[] = '';
13722| $lines[] = 'Tipo de solicitação: ' . $requestTypeLabel;
13723| $lines[] = '';
13724| if ($message !== '') {
13725| $lines[] = $message;
13726| $lines[] = '';
13727| }
13728| if ($approveUrl !== '') {
13729| $lines[] = $approveText . ': ' . $approveUrl;
13730| }
13731| if ($rejectUrl !== '') {
13732| $lines[] = $rejectText . ': ' . $rejectUrl;
13733| }
13734| if ($approveUrl !== '' || $rejectUrl !== '') {
13735| $lines[] = '';
13736| }
13737| $lines[] = 'Equipe de Recursos Humanos';
13738| if ($companyName !== '') {
13739| $lines[] = $companyName;
13740| }
13741|
13742| $body = trim(implode("\n", $lines));
13743| if ($body === '' && trim($fallbackBody) !== '') {
13744| return trim($fallbackBody);
13745| }
13746|
13747| return $body;
13748| }
13749|
13750| /**
13751| * Envia chat para emails específicos (já resolvidos), sem re-resolver por tipo.
13752| * Usado quando executeNotify já resolveu os destinatários individualmente.
13753| */
13754| private function sendChatToSpecificEmails(
13755| array $emails,
13756| FlowInstanceMember $member,
13757| string $subject,
13758| string $body,
13759| array $config = []
13760| ): array {
13761| $chatUserIds = [];
13762| $userRepo = $this->entityManager->getRepository(User::class);
13763|
13764| $chatBody = strip_tags($body);
13765| $chatBody = html_entity_decode($chatBody, ENT_QUOTES | ENT_HTML5, 'UTF-8');
13766| if (empty($chatBody)) {
13767| $chatBody = 'Você tem uma nova notificação.';
13768| }
13769|
13770| foreach ($emails as $email) {
13771| $user = $userRepo->findOneBy(['email' => $email]);
13772| if (!$user) {
13773| continue;
13774| }
13775| $result = $this->sendChatNotification($user, $subject, $chatBody, $member, 'direct', $config);
13776| if ($result['sent'] ?? false) {
13777| $chatUserIds[] = $user->getId();
13778| }
13779| }
13780|
13781| return $chatUserIds;
13782| }
13783|
13784| private function sendChatForRecipientType(
13785| string $recipientType,
13786| FlowInstanceMember $member,
13787| string $subject,
13788| string $body,
13789| array $values = [],
13790| array $config = []
13791| ): array {
13792| $chatUserIds = [];
13793|
13794| try {
13795| // Resolver destinatários do tipo (passar config para ter acesso a role_id e company_member_id)
13796| $users = $this->resolveRecipients($recipientType, $member, $config);
13797|
13798| if (empty($users)) {
13799| $this->log('warning', 'Nenhum usuário encontrado para tipo de destinatário no chat', [
13800| 'recipientType' => $recipientType
13801| ]);
13802| return [];
13803| }
13804|
13805| // Montar corpo da mensagem para chat (remover HTML se necessário)
13806| $chatBody = $body;
13807|
13808| // Se o body está vazio mas há valores do template, tentar montar uma mensagem básica
13809| if (empty($chatBody) && !empty($values)) {
13810| $chatBody = "Você recebeu uma nova notificação sobre: " . ($values['stage_name'] ?? $values['product_name'] ?? 'Processo');
13811| }
13812|
13813| // Remover tags HTML para chat (simplificado)
13814| $chatBody = strip_tags($chatBody);
13815| $chatBody = html_entity_decode($chatBody, ENT_QUOTES | ENT_HTML5, 'UTF-8');
13816|
13817| // Substituir variáveis se necessário
13818| $chatBody = $this->replaceVariables($chatBody, $member, []);
13819| $subject = $this->replaceVariables($subject, $member, []);
13820|
13821| // Se ainda está vazio, usar mensagem padrão
13822| if (empty($chatBody)) {
13823| $chatBody = "Você tem uma nova notificação.";
13824| }
13825|
13826| error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] Mensagem preparada - Subject: {$subject}, Body length: " . strlen($chatBody));
13827|
13828| // Enviar para cada usuário
13829| foreach ($users as $user) {
13830| error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] Enviando para user ID: " . $user->getId() . " (" . $user->getEmail() . "), recipientType: " . $recipientType);
13831|
13832| $result = $this->sendChatNotification($user, $subject, $chatBody, $member, $recipientType, $config);
13833|
13834| error_log("💬 [sendChatForRecipientType] Resultado: " . json_encode($result));
13835|
13836| if ($result['sent'] ?? false) {
13837| $chatUserIds[] = $user->getId();
13838| }
13839| }
13840|
Request #54
deepseek-v4-flash
P:105.74K C:804 CR:102.53K CW:0
7045ms
Reasoning
The chat path converts HTML anchors to "Label: URL", meaning the Adriana chat message could include the raw review URL as "Revisar desligamento eSocial: <url>". Hmm — The requirement says "sem expor link cru no texto" and "A mensagem de orientação deve aparecer no chat da Adriana, não como texto com link cru na notificação." The chat body may contain the raw URL in the Adriana conversation as a consequence of including the HTML link in `message_html` for email. But since the chat is inside the Adriana conversation which is expected to contain the orientation, and the link is exactly what user needs, it may be acceptable to have the "Revisar desligamento eSocial: <url>" text in Adriana chat. Not a bug.
Actually wait — For this specific automation, executeNotify creates in-app NotificationSpecialist (buttonUrl '/chat?adriana=1'). The message (plain) has no URL. Then executeSendEmail sends email with body = message_html containing the direct URL button. Good.
Now `message` plain is "Abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar os detalhes." But no link in text, good.
I think enough; the review files have these issues already confirmed. There might be no NEW issues worth reporting in these 6 files beyond confirmed ones, OR perhaps a couple of smaller ones I should report:
Let me think about whether there are NEW issues at the boundaries:
1. **list_automations and flow_detail labels added for action but the SAME action appears in flow builder config types?** Not a bug.
2. **The migration is >450 lines duplicating controller defaults (DecisionSystemController getOffboardingStages + getOffboardingTemplates).** This duplication across migration and controller seeds can drift (maintainability). Confirmed finding #7 already flags god-object duplication in the service; not the migration though. Could mention maintainability: migration duplicates existing default offboarding template structure from DecisionSystemController/WorkflowOrchestratorBuiltinStages. But these seeds are one-time. Might be worth a low-priority note but low value.
3. **YAML config_preset has `to: flow_responsible` but the action also has `has_config: false`** consistent with notify actions. Fine.
4. **In flow_detail and list_automations templates, the maps are inside functions with other actions; new label fine.
Wait — there is one more thing to verify: **in the migration, `ensureAutomation` for the create_esocial_s2299_draft stores `trigger_type` as 'on_enter' etc. But the YAML describes trigger id 'employee_enters_stage' type 'on_enter'. Fine.
Now let me review the doc claim: template `template_category` = 'offboarding_esocial'. Is there any validation elsewhere (template_category enum values)? If template_category column values are constrained by code (dropdown list) when rendering flows, using a new value 'offboarding_esocial' could break filters that only look for 'offboarding'. Let's search for template_category usages/filters and for any seed templates with category 'offboarding_esocial' vs 'offboarding'.
Let me search 'template_category' with offboarding values and any category lists in code.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "offboarding_esocial"}
Result
File: docs/database-changes/2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template.md Match lines: 1 58|O `DOWN` remove apenas templates marcados com `settings.seed_migration = 20260901171000_offboarding_esocial_s2299_flow_template` e seus registros dependentes em `flow_automations`, `flow_activities`, `flow_stages` e `flow_template_products`. File: migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php Match lines: 5 12| private const SEED_KEY = '20260901171000_offboarding_esocial_s2299_flow_template'; 207| 'preset' => 'offboarding_esocial_s2299', 220| 'category' => 'offboarding_esocial', 308| '_default_automation_id' => 'offboarding_esocial_s2299_draft_on_final_stage_enter', 315| '_default_automation_id' => 'offboarding_esocial_s2299_draft_on_final_stage_enter',
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/", "templates/"], "search_text": "template_category"}
Result
File: src/Controller/DecisionSystem/JornadaMetahumanController.php
Match lines: 5
22| private const TEMPLATE_CATEGORY = 'metahuman_journey_cycle';
41| 'templateCategory' => self::TEMPLATE_CATEGORY,
117| 'templateCategory' => self::TEMPLATE_CATEGORY,
202| if ((string) $instance->getFlowTemplate()->getTemplateCategory() !== self::TEMPLATE_CATEGORY) {
309| 'templateCategory' => self::TEMPLATE_CATEGORY,
File: src/MigrationHelper/CicloInicialEssencialTemplateMaterializer.php
Match lines: 1
82| WHERE template_category = 'initial_cycle'
File: src/Service/CicloInicialService.php
Match lines: 2
34| private const TEMPLATE_CATEGORY = 'initial_cycle';
82| $template->setTemplateCategory(self::TEMPLATE_CATEGORY);
File: src/Service/JornadaMetahumanService.php
Match lines: 7
29| private const TEMPLATE_CATEGORY = 'metahuman_journey_cycle';
65| $template->setTemplateCategory(self::TEMPLATE_CATEGORY);
303| if ((string) $template->getTemplateCategory() !== self::TEMPLATE_CATEGORY) {
545| if ((string) $template->getTemplateCategory() !== self::TEMPLATE_CATEGORY) {
675| if ((string) $template->getTemplateCategory() !== self::TEMPLATE_CATEGORY) {
1143| if ((string) $template->getTemplateCategory() !== self::TEMPLATE_CATEGORY) {
1260| if ((string) $template->getTemplateCategory() !== self::TEMPLATE_CATEGORY) {
File: templates/projects2.0/components/modal_create_project.html.twig
Match lines: 2
657| <select id="template_category_filter" class="form-control">
1080| $('#template_category_filter').on('change', function() {
Request #55
deepseek-v4-flash
P:107.27K C:2K CR:106.5K CW:0
15822ms
Reasoning
The template_category value 'offboarding_esocial' is used only in the migration (plus doc). Other categories seem free-form. It might affect front-end filtering; but there's a filter select in a project modal for template categories. Not enough to conclude.
Now let's confirm the docs file for migration exists in this change set (background said changed files include docs/database-changes/2026-09-01-offboarding-esocial-flow-template.md and docs/database-changes/README.md). So the migration documentation requirement is satisfied.
Given the confirmed findings coverage is good, let me now think about whether there are important NEW issues still. Let me think about **offboarding.yaml** again specifically; the review rules for yaml: "Check for spelling errors in yaml-keys within YAML files; ignore the content of yaml-values." Let me check the keys of the new block carefully:
```yaml
- id: "create_esocial_s2299_draft"
type: "create_esocial_s2299_draft"
title: "Criar rascunho do desligamento eSocial (S-2299)"
icon: "fa-solid fa-file-lines"
has_config: false
allowed_triggers:
- "employee_enters_stage"
blocked_triggers:
- ...
blocked_trigger_message: "..."
description: "..."
config_preset:
to: "flow_responsible"
```
All keys consistent with existing entries (which use allowed_triggers, blocked_triggers, blocked_trigger_message, config_preset, first_stage_only, last_stage_only, config_options, selectable_fields). No spelling errors.
Now maybe I should not add further comments to config yaml.
Let me double check the earlier reading of flow_detail around the added mapping to ensure no mapping for the action was added to the "trigger" list but missing in 'getTriggerLabel', e.g., the label for trigger on entering stage already existed.
Now, let me consider the new service method again for a NEW bug that is clearly real and not among #3-#6:
Consider: after the automation persists and flushes with event (created), then they set metadata eventId and flush again. Then they send notification. If notification throws (caught within executeNotify), they still return success true. OK.
Now look at line 15005: `if ($eventStatus !== 'existing_not_editable')` block applies to both 'created' and 'updated' paths. For 'updated' path event already persisted in DB; they call `applyEsocialS2299Payload` and `persist` (unnecessary but fine). However, the 'updated' path sets `$event->setUpdatedAt(new \DateTimeImmutable())` only for the updated status; but no check to see whether the payload is actually different. This duplicates #4.
For 'created' path: they create new EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento but never set `setIndRetif` for re-admission scenario (#3).
**Potential NEW issue: No `esocial_worker_data` present case: `$event` remains null, `eventStatus='draft_only'`, and metadata saved. In the event, when the worker's data gets filled later, does something re-trigger creation of the actual event? The automation only runs on entering the stage once. If at that time the worker data is missing, they will only record metadata + notify responsible. Later, after responsible fills worker data, the actual event is never created automatically — the responsible would need to move the member out and back in (or manually trigger). The automation doesn't set up a follow-up. Is this a bug? The action returns message "dados eSocial pendentes impedem criar o evento oficial" and notifies. The requirement says "Cria ou atualiza o rascunho do evento S-2299 ... e notifica o responsável para revisar". For a company with eSocial enabled, an employee lacking worker data is an edge case; but the responsible is notified to fix data, and after fixing they can... hmm, maybe re-run. This is incomplete flow but speculative. Skip.
Given uncertainty, I'll avoid inventing.
Wait, maybe I should examine the repository selection query for the event by trabalhador ordering by id DESC; but the id in the JOINED inheritance (esocial_events parent id) is shared among all event types. EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento rows have their own esocial_events.id, since each subclass row gets an id from esocial_events; the ordering by id DESC is fine.
Now, one more important check: When creating a new event, the code sets status 'pendente' but does not set company on existing pendente events in 'updated' path (existing). fine.
Also the code sets `$event->setDadosRemuneracao($remuneracao)`; for updated path fine.
Now let me review the twig change in motivo_desligamento more thoroughly: Actually look at line 99 - correct. But also there's an identical issue in another template? The PR changed only this one; maybe the same bug exists in other "desligamento" guides. E.g., `aviso_previo.html.twig` also has `prevEvts.desligamento` checks where the guide is about desligamento S-2299 events (which is correct there, since prevEvts.desligamento = previous S-2299 event; uses indPagtoApi). That template uses prevEvts.desligamento.indPagtoApi — that's for S-2299 previous events; since the event is S-2299, `.desligamento` is right. OK.
The motivo_desligamento template is in member_guides_esocial_termino (S-2399 TSV termino) where prevEvts.termino is right. Fix consistent.
At this point I've checked all 6 files thoroughly. The confirmed findings capture main issues. For a thorough review, should I add any NEW comments? Some potential NEW observations worth reporting:
**NEW-1:** `templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig` — the fix only corrects the process-number field; the same template section for "Data do Término" uses `prevEvts.termino.dtTerm|date('Y-m-d')` — if dtTerm is a string in 'Y-m-d', calling date filter might... no, it's fine as existing. Not new.
**NEW-2:** In `AutomationExecutionService` (region ~7039-7044 & 13903): with `system_sender`, in-app notification uses buttonUrl '/chat?adriana=1' only for NotificationsCenter; but NotificationSpecialist (badge/popup) has no deep link or buttonUrl — it has plain title/message. The requirement about button "ver detalhes" presumably in NotificationsCenter; OK.
**NEW-3 (medium confidence):** When `$isSystemSender` is true, the chat message is created with `$chatMessage->setIsInitialMessage(false)` (13948). The "shared support channel" mode uses setIsInitialMessage(true). If rendering the Adriana conversation depends on `isInitialMessage` to show the message properly, an is_initial_message=false message might not be displayed as "Adriana" or could be hidden until user opens chat? Need to check how front-end renders chat messages. This is speculative.
Actually, let me look at the front-end chat rendering, but that template isn't in the diff/review group. This would be a cross-file observation referencing sendChatNotification change (within review file). We can comment on the service change. But is it a real issue? If the Adriana conversation expects messages from Adriana with user_id=null and initial flag maybe false is fine for subsequent messages. Probably fine.
**NEW-4 (worth reporting):** The new automation action in the default template and in the code assumes the member's `FlowInstanceMember.getCompanyMember()`? Actually they use findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember. Let me verify that method exists and how it resolves. At line 15421. Let me read it.
Also want to verify `getFlowResponsible` exists on FlowInstance entity and `getOffboardingFlowResponsible` on Offboarding entity. Let me read those two methods.
Tool Calls (3)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 15468, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 15410}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15468)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 15410-15468
15410| ];
15411|
15412| } catch (\Exception $e) {
15413| error_log("[AUTOMATION] ❌ delay_platform_access_removal error: " . $e->getMessage());
15414| return ['success' => false, 'error' => $e->getMessage()];
15415| }
15416| }
15417|
15418| /**
15419| * Busca o OffboardingMember correspondente a um FlowInstanceMember
15420| */
15421| private function findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember(FlowInstanceMember $member): ?\App\Entity\OffboardingMember
15422| {
15423| $sourceId = $member->getSourceId();
15424| $user = $member->getUser();
15425|
15426| // PRIORIDADE 1: Buscar pelo offboardingMemberId no activities_progress
15427| $activitiesProgress = $member->getActivitiesProgress() ?? [];
15428| if (!empty($activitiesProgress['offboardingMemberId'])) {
15429| $omId = (int) $activitiesProgress['offboardingMemberId'];
15430| $offboardingMember = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\OffboardingMember::class)->find($omId);
15431| if ($offboardingMember) {
15432| error_log("[AUTOMATION] findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember: Encontrado via activities_progress.offboardingMemberId = {$omId}");
15433| return $offboardingMember;
15434| }
15435| }
15436|
15437| // FALLBACK: Busca tradicional por offboarding + companyMember
15438| if (!$sourceId || !$user) {
15439| return null;
15440| }
15441|
15442| // Buscar o offboarding
15443| $offboarding = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\Offboarding::class)->find($sourceId);
15444| if (!$offboarding) {
15445| return null;
15446| }
15447|
15448| // Buscar company_member do user
15449| $company = $offboarding->getCompany();
15450| $companyMember = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\CompanyMembers::class)
15451| ->findOneBy(['user' => $user, 'company' => $company]);
15452|
15453| if (!$companyMember) {
15454| return null;
15455| }
15456|
15457| // Buscar offboarding_member
15458| $offboardingMember = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\OffboardingMember::class)
15459| ->findOneBy(['offboarding' => $offboarding, 'companyMember' => $companyMember]);
15460|
15461| if ($offboardingMember) {
15462| error_log("[AUTOMATION] findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember: Encontrado via offboarding+companyMember (fallback), OM ID = {$offboardingMember->getId()}");
15463| }
15464|
15465| return $offboardingMember;
15466| }
15467|}
15468|
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Entity/Offboarding.php"], "search_text": "getOffboardingFlowResponsible"}
Result
File: src/Entity/Offboarding.php Match lines: 1 217| public function getOffboardingFlowResponsible(): ?CompanyMembers
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Entity/FlowInstance.php"], "search_text": "function getFlowResponsible"}
Result
File: src/Entity/FlowInstance.php Match lines: 1 269| public function getFlowResponsible(): ?CompanyMembers
Request #56
deepseek-v4-flash
P:110.13K C:591 CR:109.18K CW:0
5479ms
Reasoning
These methods exist. `findOffboardingMemberForFlowMember` relies on either `activities_progress.offboardingMemberId` or a user+company. Note the fallback requires `$user` (member->getUser()) to be present to find companyMember. In offboarding workflows, FlowInstanceMember->user might be null? Existing delay actions use this same helper — proven pattern. OK.
At this stage, I believe there may be no additional *certain* defects beyond the confirmed ones. But the instructions ask to continue reviewing and report any other real issues found, and confirm coverage of every file. Since the previously confirmed findings already include the major issues, I should decide if there are any further real issues worth a comment that aren't duplicates.
Let me reconsider duplicates risk carefully: #3 says: the S-2299 event lookup isn't tied to the current dismissal — if the latest event for the worker is not 'pendente', the automation never creates a draft for the new dismissal. But also, **the code does the same "lookup latest" even for creating 'created' state after a "pendente" exists**: picks pendente and updates. #4 covers overwriting.
What about the case where the member has **no esocial worker data**, eventStatus = 'draft_only', and event = null. On subsequent re-entry... same, no event. Fine.
What else could be genuinely new and specific to this diff?
### Potential NEW issue: `system_sender` is boolean-filtered from `$config` in `sendChatNotification`, but `executeSendEmail` also passes `$config` (emailConfig) to chat sending functions? Let me verify that executeSendEmail passes the emailConfig into sendChatNotification — we saw emailConfig['system_sender'] added at 7044, then executeSendEmail($emailConfig...). Within executeSendEmail, the chat sending uses $emailConfig for chat config (that's why the author added the key there). Let me confirm quickly to make sure the new config value actually reaches sendChatNotification's $config; otherwise the entire system_sender feature would not work, making all these chat messages go to the manager's direct conversation instead of Adriana. Let me read executeSendEmail quickly (search the method and its chat integration). This is important: if the feature doesn't actually propagate, the new code silently doesn't do what's intended — a functional bug.
Let me find executeSendEmail and read the chat-sending part.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "private function executeSendEmail"}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php Match lines: 1 5915| private function executeSendEmail(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
Request #57
deepseek-v4-flash
P:110.78K C:90 CR:110.59K CW:0
1940ms
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 6400, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 5915}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15468)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 5915-6400
5915| private function executeSendEmail(array $config, ?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
5916| {
5917| error_log('[EMAIL DEBUG] ========== executeSendEmail START ==========');
5918| error_log('[EMAIL DEBUG] Config: ' . json_encode($config));
5919| error_log('[EMAIL DEBUG] Member ID: ' . ($member?->getId() ?? 'NULL'));
5920| error_log('[EMAIL DEBUG] Context: ' . json_encode($context));
5921|
5922| $to = $config['to'] ?? null;
5923| $recipient = $config['recipient'] ?? null; // Explicit recipient type only
5924| $subject = $config['subject'] ?? 'Notificação MetaHuman';
5925| $body = $config['body'] ?? '';
5926| $templateSlug = $config['template'] ?? null;
5927|
5928| error_log('[EMAIL DEBUG] Initial values: to=' . ($to ?? 'NULL') . ', templateSlug=' . ($templateSlug ?? 'NULL'));
5929|
5930| // Known recipient type keywords
5931| $knownRecipientTypes = ['candidate', 'interviewer', 'responsible', 'manager', 'employee',
5932| 'member', 'collaborator', 'gestor', 'monitored_evaluator', 'company_member', 'role', 'flow_responsible', 'administrators',
5933| 'direct_manager', 'goal_responsible', 'record_owner', 'board_owner'];
5934|
5935| // Store original recipient type for auto-template resolution and chat notification.
5936| // _resolved_recipient_type is set by executeNotify when the recipient was already
5937| // resolved to a specific email — avoids re-resolving all managers/admins again.
5938| $originalRecipientType = $config['_resolved_recipient_type'] ?? null;
5939| if (!$originalRecipientType) {
5940| if ($to && in_array($to, $knownRecipientTypes)) {
5941| $originalRecipientType = $to;
5942| } elseif ($recipient && in_array($recipient, $knownRecipientTypes)) {
5943| $originalRecipientType = $recipient;
5944| }
5945| }
5946|
5947| $recipientContext = array_merge($context ?? [], $config);
5948| // If $to is a known recipient type (not an email), resolve it
5949| if ($to && in_array($to, $knownRecipientTypes) && $member) {
5950| // manager: gestores por permissão do produto (assessment etc.); role/administrators: contexto extra
5951| if (in_array($to, ['role', 'company_member', 'administrators', 'manager'])) {
5952| $users = $this->resolveRecipients($to, $member, $recipientContext);
5953| $to = array_values(array_filter(array_map(fn($u) => $u->getEmail(), $users)));
5954| $to = !empty($to) ? $to : null;
5955| } else {
5956| $to = $this->resolveRecipientEmail($to, $member);
5957| }
5958| }
5959| // Otherwise, if explicit $recipient type is set, resolve it
5960| elseif ($recipient && in_array($recipient, $knownRecipientTypes) && $member) {
5961| if (in_array($recipient, ['role', 'company_member', 'administrators', 'manager'])) {
5962| $users = $this->resolveRecipients($recipient, $member, $recipientContext);
5963| $to = array_values(array_filter(array_map(fn($u) => $u->getEmail(), $users)));
5964| $to = !empty($to) ? $to : null;
5965| } else {
5966| $to = $this->resolveRecipientEmail($recipient, $member);
5967| }
5968| } elseif ($to === 'member' && $member) {
5969| $to = $member->getUser()?->getEmail() ?? $member->getCompanyMember()?->getEmail();
5970| }
5971|
5972| if (!$to) {
5973| error_log('[EMAIL DEBUG] ❌ NO RECIPIENT - returning error');
5974| return ['sent' => false, 'error' => 'Destinatário não especificado'];
5975| }
5976|
5977| error_log('[EMAIL DEBUG] Recipient resolved: ' . json_encode($to));
5978|
5979| // Se não tem template explícito, resolver automaticamente por trigger+recipient
5980| // $originalRecipientType captura tanto config['to'] quanto config['recipient']
5981| $skipAutoTemplate = filter_var($config['skip_auto_email_template'] ?? false, FILTER_VALIDATE_BOOLEAN);
5982| if (!$templateSlug && !$skipAutoTemplate && $originalRecipientType && $member) {
5983| $templateSlug = $this->resolveAutoTemplateSlug($member, $originalRecipientType, $context);
5984| error_log('[EMAIL DEBUG] Auto-resolved templateSlug: ' . ($templateSlug ?? 'NULL'));
5985| }
5986|
5987| // Normalizar $to para sempre ser um array
5988| $recipients = is_array($to) ? $to : [$to];
5989| $sentCount = 0;
5990| $errors = [];
5991| $chatMessagesSent = [];
5992|
5993| error_log('[EMAIL DEBUG] Recipients array: ' . json_encode($recipients));
5994| error_log('[EMAIL DEBUG] CompanySenderGenerator available: ' . ($this->companySenderGenerator ? 'YES' : 'NO'));
5995|
5996| // Use CompanySenderGenerator when template slug is set
5997| if ($templateSlug && $this->companySenderGenerator && $member) {
5998| error_log('[EMAIL DEBUG] Trying to use CompanySenderGenerator...');
5999| $flowInstance = $member->getFlowInstance();
6000| error_log('[EMAIL DEBUG] FlowInstance: ' . ($flowInstance ? 'EXISTS (ID=' . $flowInstance->getId() . ')' : 'NULL'));
6001|
6002| if ($flowInstance && $flowInstance->getCompany()) {
6003| $company = $flowInstance->getCompany();
6004| error_log('[EMAIL DEBUG] Company: ' . $company->getName() . ' (ID=' . $company->getId() . ')');
6005| $values = $this->buildEmailTemplateValues($member, $recipientContext);
6006| $isUnifiedBpmRequestTemplate = $templateSlug === 'bpm-request_notification'
6007| || !empty($recipientContext['approve_url'])
6008| || !empty($recipientContext['reject_url']);
6009| if ($isUnifiedBpmRequestTemplate) {
6010| $values = $this->enrichRequestNotificationTemplateValues($values, $recipientContext);
6011| }
6012|
6013| // Try primary slug first; if nothing sent (missing DB template etc.), fall back to generic BPM template
6014| $slugsToTry = [$templateSlug];
6015| if ($templateSlug !== self::BPM_GENERIC_EMAIL_TEMPLATE_SLUG) {
6016| $slugsToTry[] = self::BPM_GENERIC_EMAIL_TEMPLATE_SLUG;
6017| }
6018|
6019| $slugUsed = $templateSlug;
6020| foreach ($slugsToTry as $trySlug) {
6021| $roundSent = 0;
6022| $roundErrors = [];
6023| foreach ($recipients as $recipientEmail) {
6024| try {
6025| error_log("[EMAIL DEBUG] Calling sendMessage to={$recipientEmail}, template={$trySlug}");
6026| $sent = $this->companySenderGenerator->sendMessage($company, $trySlug, $recipientEmail, $values);
6027| error_log('[EMAIL DEBUG] sendMessage returned: ' . var_export($sent, true));
6028|
6029| if ($sent > 0) {
6030| $roundSent++;
6031| error_log("[EMAIL DEBUG] ✅ EMAIL ENVIADO com sucesso para {$recipientEmail}");
6032| $this->log('info', '✅ EMAIL ENVIADO VIA AUTOMAÇÃO', [
6033| 'to' => $recipientEmail,
6034| 'recipient_type' => $recipient,
6035| 'template' => $trySlug,
6036| 'company' => $company->getName(),
6037| 'member_email' => $member->getUser()?->getEmail() ?? $member->getCompanyMember()?->getEmail(),
6038| ]);
6039| } else {
6040| error_log("[EMAIL DEBUG] ⚠️ sendMessage retornou 0 - email NÃO enviado para {$recipientEmail}");
6041| }
6042| } catch (\Exception $e) {
6043| error_log('[EMAIL DEBUG] ❌ EXCEÇÃO ao enviar email: ' . $e->getMessage());
6044| $roundErrors[] = [
6045| 'to' => $recipientEmail,
6046| 'error' => $e->getMessage(),
6047| ];
6048| $this->log('error', 'Erro ao enviar e-mail via CompanySenderGenerator', [
6049| 'to' => $recipientEmail,
6050| 'error' => $e->getMessage(),
6051| 'template' => $trySlug,
6052| ]);
6053| }
6054| }
6055| if ($roundSent > 0) {
6056| $sentCount = $roundSent;
6057| $slugUsed = $trySlug;
6058| $errors = $roundErrors;
6059| break;
6060| }
6061| $errors = array_merge($errors, $roundErrors);
6062| }
6063|
6064| // 💬 TAMBÉM ENVIAR NO CHAT para destinatários conhecidos.
6065| // Quando _resolved_recipient_type está setado, o destinatário já foi
6066| // resolvido externamente (executeNotify) — enviar chat apenas para $recipients
6067| // específicos para evitar multiplicação (N managers × N re-resolvidos).
6068| if ($originalRecipientType && $member) {
6069| $chatBody = $this->renderEmailTemplateBody($company, $slugUsed, $values);
6070| if ($isUnifiedBpmRequestTemplate) {
6071| $chatBody = $this->buildRequestNotificationChatBody($values, $config, $chatBody);
6072| }
6073|
6074| if (isset($config['_resolved_recipient_type'])) {
6075| $chatMessagesSent = $this->sendChatToSpecificEmails($recipients, $member, $subject, $chatBody, $config);
6076| } else {
6077| $chatMessagesSent = $this->sendChatForRecipientType($originalRecipientType, $member, $subject, $chatBody, $values, $config);
6078| }
6079| }
6080|
6081| return [
6082| 'sent' => $sentCount > 0,
6083| 'sent_count' => $sentCount,
6084| 'total_recipients' => count($recipients),
6085| 'to' => $recipients,
6086| 'template' => $slugUsed,
6087| 'via' => 'CompanySenderGenerator',
6088| 'errors' => $errors,
6089| 'chatMessagesSent' => count($chatMessagesSent),
6090| 'chatUserIds' => $chatMessagesSent
6091| ];
6092| }
6093| }
6094|
6095| $body = $this->replaceVariables($body, $member, $context);
6096| $subject = $this->replaceVariables($subject, $member, $context);
6097|
6098| if ($this->mailer) {
6099| foreach ($recipients as $recipientEmail) {
6100| try {
6101| $email = (new Email())
6102| ->from('noreply@metahuman.com')
6103| ->to($recipientEmail)
6104| ->subject($subject)
6105| ->html($body);
6106|
6107| $this->mailer->send($email);
6108| $sentCount++;
6109| } catch (\Exception $e) {
6110| $errors[] = [
6111| 'to' => $recipientEmail,
6112| 'error' => $e->getMessage()
6113| ];
6114| }
6115| }
6116|
6117| // 💬 TAMBÉM ENVIAR NO CHAT para destinatários conhecidos (usa o body já com variáveis substituídas)
6118| if ($originalRecipientType && $member) {
6119| $isUnifiedBpmRequestTemplate = ($templateSlug === 'bpm-request_notification')
6120| || !empty($config['approve_url'])
6121| || !empty($config['reject_url']);
6122| if ($isUnifiedBpmRequestTemplate) {
6123| $fallbackValues = $this->buildEmailTemplateValues($member, $recipientContext);
6124| $fallbackValues = $this->enrichRequestNotificationTemplateValues($fallbackValues, $recipientContext);
6125| $body = $this->buildRequestNotificationChatBody($fallbackValues, $config, $body);
6126| }
6127| if (isset($config['_resolved_recipient_type'])) {
6128| $chatMessagesSent = $this->sendChatToSpecificEmails($recipients, $member, $subject, $body, $config);
6129| } else {
6130| $chatMessagesSent = $this->sendChatForRecipientType($originalRecipientType, $member, $subject, $body, [], $config);
6131| }
6132| }
6133|
6134| return [
6135| 'sent' => $sentCount > 0,
6136| 'sent_count' => $sentCount,
6137| 'total_recipients' => count($recipients),
6138| 'to' => $recipients,
6139| 'subject' => $subject,
6140| 'errors' => $errors,
6141| 'chatMessagesSent' => count($chatMessagesSent),
6142| 'chatUserIds' => $chatMessagesSent
6143| ];
6144| }
6145|
6146| $this->log('info', 'Email seria enviado (mailer não configurado)', [
6147| 'to' => $recipients,
6148| 'subject' => $subject
6149| ]);
6150|
6151| return ['sent' => false, 'simulated' => true, 'to' => $recipients, 'subject' => $subject];
6152| }
6153|
6154| /**
6155| * Builds the values array for CompanySenderGenerator (Twig template variables).
6156| * Maps member/context to keys commonly used in EmailTemplate (companyName, nome, message, etc.).
6157| */
6158| private function buildEmailTemplateValues(?FlowInstanceMember $member, array $context): array
6159| {
6160| $values = [
6161| // Variáveis básicas
6162| 'companyName' => '',
6163| 'nome' => '',
6164| 'member_name' => '',
6165| 'member_email' => '',
6166| 'email' => '',
6167| 'stage_name' => '',
6168| 'product_name' => '',
6169| 'assessment_name' => '',
6170| 'assessment_type' => '',
6171| 'company_name' => '',
6172| 'title' => $context['title'] ?? $context['subject'] ?? '',
6173| 'notification_title' => $context['notification_title'] ?? $context['title'] ?? $context['subject'] ?? '',
6174| 'message' => $context['message'] ?? $context['body'] ?? '',
6175| 'current_date' => (new \DateTime())->format('d/m/Y'),
6176| 'current_time' => (new \DateTime())->format('H:i'),
6177|
6178| // Variáveis de sistema/URL
6179| 'baseurl' => $_ENV['APP_URL'] ?? 'http://localhost',
6180| 'base_url' => $_ENV['APP_URL'] ?? 'http://localhost',
6181| 'app_url' => $_ENV['APP_URL'] ?? 'http://localhost',
6182|
6183| // Variáveis de processo
6184| 'processName' => '',
6185| 'process_name' => '',
6186| 'processId' => '',
6187| 'process_id' => '',
6188| 'chave' => '', // Chave de acesso
6189|
6190| // Variáveis de entrevista
6191| 'dateTo' => '',
6192| 'data_entrevista' => '',
6193| 'hora_entrevista' => '',
6194| 'link_entrevista' => '',
6195| 'commentAdmin' => '',
6196|
6197| // Variáveis flat para candidato/registro
6198| 'candidato_nome' => '',
6199| 'candidato_email' => '',
6200| 'registro_token' => '',
6201| 'registro_email' => '',
6202|
6203| // Variáveis de onboarding
6204| 'onboarding_name' => '',
6205| 'step_name' => '',
6206| 'activity_name' => '',
6207| 'progress' => '',
6208| 'link' => '',
6209| 'url' => '',
6210| 'button_text' => 'Acessar',
6211| 'button_url' => $_ENV['APP_URL'] ?? 'http://localhost',
6212| 'footer' => '',
6213| 'header' => '',
6214| 'content' => '',
6215| 'description' => '',
6216| 'subtitle' => '',
6217|
6218| // Variáveis de PDI
6219| 'goal_name' => '',
6220| 'goal_title' => '',
6221| 'goal_description' => '',
6222| 'goal_percentage' => '',
6223|
6224| // Flow / Orquestrador (Twig templates may use these alongside {{ title }} / {{ message }})
6225| 'flow_instance_id' => '',
6226| 'flow_instance_name' => '',
6227| 'flow_template_name' => '',
6228| 'kanban_card_title' => '',
6229| ];
6230|
6231| if ($member) {
6232| $user = $member->getUser();
6233| $companyMemberDirect = $member->getCompanyMember();
6234|
6235| $profile = $user?->getProfile();
6236|
6237| if ($user) {
6238| $fullName = $profile ? trim($profile->getFirstName() . ' ' . $profile->getLastName()) : '';
6239| if ($fullName === '') {
6240| $fullName = $user->getEmail() ?? '';
6241| }
6242| $memberEmail = $user->getEmail();
6243| } elseif ($companyMemberDirect) {
6244| $fullName = trim($companyMemberDirect->getFirstName() . ' ' . $companyMemberDirect->getLastName());
6245| if ($fullName === '') {
6246| $fullName = $companyMemberDirect->getEmail() ?? '';
6247| }
6248| $memberEmail = $companyMemberDirect->getEmail();
6249| } else {
6250| $fullName = '';
6251| $memberEmail = '';
6252| }
6253|
6254| // For CRM source types, resolve name/email from the CRM record entity when not already known
6255| if ($fullName === '') {
6256| $crmEntity = $this->resolveCrmRecordEntityFromFlowMember($member);
6257| if ($crmEntity !== null) {
6258| if (method_exists($crmEntity, 'getNameLead')) {
6259| $fullName = trim(($crmEntity->getNameLead() ?? '') . ' ' . ($crmEntity->getSurnameLead() ?? ''));
6260| if (method_exists($crmEntity, 'getEmailLead') && $memberEmail === '') {
6261| $memberEmail = (string) ($crmEntity->getEmailLead() ?? '');
6262| }
6263| } elseif (method_exists($crmEntity, 'getName')) {
6264| $fullName = trim((string) ($crmEntity->getName() ?? ''));
6265| if (method_exists($crmEntity, 'getEmail') && $memberEmail === '') {
6266| $memberEmail = (string) ($crmEntity->getEmail() ?? '');
6267| }
6268| }
6269| }
6270| }
6271|
6272| if ($fullName === '') {
6273| $fullName = $this->resolveMemberDisplayName($member);
6274| }
6275|
6276| $values['nome'] = $fullName;
6277| $values['member_name'] = $fullName;
6278| $values['member_email'] = $memberEmail;
6279| $values['email'] = $memberEmail;
6280|
6281| // Preencher dados do candidato (flat)
6282| $values['candidato_nome'] = $fullName;
6283| $values['candidato_email'] = $memberEmail;
6284|
6285| // Preencher dados de registro (flat)
6286| $values['registro_token'] = '';
6287| $values['registro_email'] = $memberEmail;
6288|
6289| // Preencher dados de avaliador (flat) - para templates de entrevista
6290| $values['avaliador_primeironome'] = '';
6291| $values['avaliador_ultimonome'] = '';
6292| $values['avaliador_email'] = '';
6293|
6294| // Usar nome da etapa original (antes do stage_change) se disponível no contexto
6295| if (!empty($context['_original_stage_name'])) {
6296| $values['stage_name'] = $context['_original_stage_name'];
6297| } elseif ($member->getCurrentStage()) {
6298| $values['stage_name'] = $member->getCurrentStage()->getName();
6299| }
6300| if ($member->getProduct()) {
6301| $values['product_name'] = $member->getProduct()->getName();
6302| }
6303|
6304| // Variáveis reutilizáveis para templates de assessment (qualquer assessment_*)
6305| $currentStageProduct = $member->getCurrentStage()?->getProduct();
6306| $currentStageProductSlug = strtolower((string) ($currentStageProduct?->getSlug() ?? ''));
6307| $assessmentTypeFromProduct = str_starts_with($currentStageProductSlug, 'assessment_')
6308| ? substr($currentStageProductSlug, strlen('assessment_'))
6309| : '';
6310| $assessmentType = (string) ($context['assessmentType'] ?? $assessmentTypeFromProduct);
6311| $assessmentType = strtolower(trim($assessmentType));
6312|
6313| $assessmentNameFromProduct = '';
6314| if (!empty($currentStageProduct?->getName())) {
6315| $assessmentNameFromProduct = preg_replace('/^assessment(\s+de)?\s+/iu', '', (string) $currentStageProduct->getName()) ?? '';
6316| $assessmentNameFromProduct = trim($assessmentNameFromProduct);
6317| }
6318|
6319| $assessmentName = $assessmentNameFromProduct;
6320| if ($assessmentName === '' && $assessmentType !== '') {
6321| $assessmentName = ucwords(str_replace('_', ' ', $assessmentType));
6322| }
6323|
6324| $values['assessment_type'] = $assessmentType;
6325| $values['assessment_name'] = $assessmentName;
6326| $flowInstance = $member->getFlowInstance();
6327| if ($flowInstance) {
6328| // Get process name from FlowInstance or source
6329| if ($member->getSourceType() === 'process' && $member->getSourceId()) {
6330| $process = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\Process::class)->find($member->getSourceId());
6331| if ($process) {
6332| $values['processName'] = $process->getName();
6333| $values['process_name'] = $process->getName();
6334| $values['processId'] = $process->getId();
6335| $values['process_id'] = $process->getId();
6336| }
6337| }
6338|
6339| if (!isset($values['processName']) || empty($values['processName'])) {
6340| if ($flowInstance->getFlowTemplate()) {
6341| $values['processName'] = $flowInstance->getFlowTemplate()->getName();
6342| $values['process_name'] = $flowInstance->getFlowTemplate()->getName();
6343| }
6344| }
6345|
6346| if ($flowInstance->getCompany()) {
6347| $values['companyName'] = $flowInstance->getCompany()->getName();
6348| $values['company_name'] = $flowInstance->getCompany()->getName();
6349| }
6350|
6351| $values['flow_instance_id'] = (string) $flowInstance->getId();
6352| $values['flow_instance_name'] = (string) ($flowInstance->getName() ?? '');
6353| $flowTpl = $flowInstance->getFlowTemplate();
6354| if ($flowTpl) {
6355| $values['flow_template_name'] = (string) $flowTpl->getName();
6356| }
6357|
6358| // Preencher title com nome do flow/processo/etapa
6359| if (empty($values['title'])) {
6360| $values['title'] = $values['processName'] ?? $values['stage_name'] ?? 'Notificação';
6361| }
6362| }
6363|
6364| $values['kanban_card_title'] = $this->resolveFlowKanbanCardTitle($member);
6365|
6366| // Para onboarding, buscar dados específicos
6367| $sourceType = $member->getSourceType();
6368| $sourceId = $member->getSourceId();
6369|
6370| // Buscar OnboardingMember correto pelo onboarding (sourceId) e user ou companyMember
6371| $onboardingMember = null;
6372| if ($sourceType === 'onboarding' && $sourceId) {
6373| $omRepo = $this->entityManager->getRepository(\App\Entity\OnboardingMember::class);
6374| if ($user) {
6375| $onboardingMember = $omRepo
6376| ->createQueryBuilder('om')
6377| ->join('om.companyMember', 'cm')
6378| ->where('om.onboarding = :onboardingId')
6379| ->andWhere('cm.user = :user')
6380| ->setParameter('onboardingId', $sourceId)
6381| ->setParameter('user', $user)
6382| ->setMaxResults(1)
6383| ->getQuery()
6384| ->getOneOrNullResult();
6385| } elseif ($companyMemberDirect) {
6386| $onboardingMember = $omRepo->findOneBy([
6387| 'onboarding' => $sourceId,
6388| 'companyMember' => $companyMemberDirect,
6389| ]);
6390| }
6391| }
6392|
6393| if ($onboardingMember && $onboardingMember->getOnboarding()) {
6394| $onboarding = $onboardingMember->getOnboarding();
6395| $values['title'] = $values['title'] ?: $onboarding->getName();
6396| $values['onboarding_name'] = $onboarding->getName();
6397| $values['processName'] = $values['processName'] ?: $onboarding->getName();
6398| $values['process_name'] = $values['process_name'] ?: $onboarding->getName();
6399|
6400| // Em fluxos multi-produto, o membro pode ter sourceType=onboarding e já estar
Request #58
deepseek-v4-flash
P:117.79K C:3.37K CR:110.85K CW:0
25324ms
Reasoning
executeSendEmail indeed passes `$config` to sendChatNotification via sendChatForRecipientType/sendChatToSpecificEmails; since executeNotify adds `system_sender` to emailConfig (line 7044), it propagates to chat. And since the S-2299 automation config has no `template`, executeNotify... Wait important: For the S-2299 automation, in executeNotify, `$templateSlug = $config['template'] ?? null` → null. `$emailTemplateBody = message_html` (non-empty). In executeNotify line 7028: `if ($templateSlug || !empty($emailTemplateBody))` → true (body exists). Then executeSendEmail called with emailConfig including template = null. In executeSendEmail: since no template slug and originalRecipientType='company_member', it will resolve auto template slug via `resolveAutoTemplateSlug($member, 'company_member', $context)`. Then if it finds a DB template, it uses the CompanySenderGenerator path (emails sent via template and chat body from rendered template — which would override message_html!). Otherwise falls to plain mailer path, with body = messageHtml and chat body = body (which contains the direct URL after strip_tags? chat body = body with html? They strip tags at sendChatForRecipientType? In the plain-mailer path (6098-6131) chat body is $body = rendered messageHtml (with html anchor). sendChatForRecipientType does strip_tags, which removes anchor leaving plain text without link? Actually strip_tags removes the <a> tag and its attributes but leaves inner text "Revisar desligamento eSocial" without URL. So chat may omit the review URL entirely in the plain path. In CompanySenderGenerator path, renderEmailTemplateBody converts anchor into "label: URL".
Given the possibility of auto-resolved template (unpredictable), the actual chat content/URL presence is inconsistent. But there is a design: The requirement says chat with Adriana should have orientation; in-app notification button goes to chat. This nuance is not a definite bug.
Now, my conclusion: it appears the PR's main issues are already captured by the 7 confirmed findings. However, I should still double check for at least 1-2 additional real findings to add value, being careful with precision.
Let me reconsider a real issue in the migration not yet covered: **In `up()`, when `ensureWorkflow` finds no existing workflow for the company, it creates one with `is_default = 1` — but there's no check whether the company already has another default workflow, potentially making two default workflows in the company.** Hmm. Actually "Fluxos de Saída" is the offboarding workflow; if it doesn't exist yet, and a company only uses onboarding, they get an offboarding workflow as default. This is essentially same family as #2 (creating for companies that don't use it). #2 says "cria workflow 'Fluxos de Saída', template e 3 etapas mesmo para tenants que não usam offboarding". So don't repeat.
**Potential NEW issue: `down()` uses JOIN DELETE for flow_automations and flow_activities; then deletes flow_stages. However, if `flow_stages` has FK from `flow_instance_members.current_stage_id` etc with SET NULL — the confirmations cover instance deletion (template). Not new.
**Potential NEW issue in down(): After deleting template rows, doesn't reset products/workflows active flags or delete `workflow_products` rows — but those existed before this migration?** Wait, important subtlety! `ensureWorkflow`/`ensureWorkflowProduct`/`ensureProduct` in `up()` are *idempotent* and update/insert only if missing. If a company already had the 'Fluxos de Saída' workflow and 'offboarding' product, up() does nothing to them (only template/stages). But if the company did NOT have them (fresh), up() creates the workflow + workflow_product + product. down() then removes the template but leaves the workflow/workflow_product/product rows it created. Confirmed finding #1 mentions rollback doesn't remove workflows/workflow_products. So covered.
Now, what about the idempotency of the migration doc requirement: "Migration deve ser idempotente (não falhar se rodada de novo)". Doctrine migrations won't re-run. Fine.
Let me now think about **Migration isTransactional(): false** — they use direct connection and commits each statement? Without transaction, if an error occurs mid-loop for company 5, the earlier companies already inserted remain, and the migration fails. Re-running the migration (after fixing) would be idempotent due to ensure checks, so partial state heals. That's the reason for transactional false + ensure methods. OK.
Potential NEW issue: In `up()`, `company` query doesn't filter companies that already have flow template seeds from previous partial runs → ensureTemplate would find existing by workflow_id+seed and return; fine.
Given the analysis, I'm not confident about additional blocking NEW issues beyond the confirmed ones. But the prompt says "Continue reviewing all files in <review_files> and report any other real issues you find." I can add low/medium comments for a few *real but lower severity* observations that are NOT in confirmed findings and that hold under scrutiny:
Candidate NEW comments:
**A (medium, migration):** Re-running the `down()` then `up()` is not idempotent? Not relevant.
**B (medium, migration):** `up()` silently returns (success) when any of the required tables doesn't exist — a "no-op success" could hide a wrong DB. But this is standard guard pattern used elsewhere. Skip.
**C (medium, service):** In `executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft`, when eventStatus === 'existing_not_editable', they still notify the responsible saying the draft was created even though no new draft was created? The message says "Rascunho do S-2299 registrado; já existe evento oficial não editável para este trabalhador" but the notification title/message sent to the responsible always says 'O rascunho do S-2299 de X foi criado a partir do offboarding... Revisar' — leading the user to review an already-transmitted old event (from previous dismissal). That misleads. Let's see: they always send notification 'Revisar desligamento eSocial (S-2299)' with message about the draft created, regardless of eventStatus. When the eventStatus is 'existing_not_editable' or missing data, the notification still claims the draft was created (only in the return message it's nuanced). The notification message itself isn't conditional, so a user receives "rascunho criado" notification even when no draft was actually created (either existing official event or missing data). That's a genuine user-facing inconsistency but maybe minor. Real? Yes, but the notification still points to review the situation. Severity low/medium.
Actually — when data missing (esocial worker data absent), no event created; but the responsible is notified "O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding." — false statement. A user could spend time searching for a draft that doesn't exist. It's a UX/correctness nit. Low.
**D (medium, service):** In executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft, `dataDesligamento` fallback to `requestedAt` may set termination date to the offboarding start date; when a real S-2299 event is then generated from this draft, the date would be wrong — and if the draft is approved without review, sends wrong date. But it's a draft requiring review. Low.
Hmm. Precision over recall, the instruction for this PHP project says report only defects likely real and blocking. I'd better stick with high-confidence real findings.
Let me look for one more concrete and significant issue: **the automation stores metadata eventId from `$event?->getId()` BEFORE flush (in the first metadata write at 15024), and then does a second flush to update eventId.** They fix it by second flush. Not bug.
**Another concrete: `$this->entityManager->flush()` at line 15033 flushes the event created but ALSO everything else pending in the unit of work, possibly persisting other unrelated changes in the same request.** In these automation services, that's common. Not new.
Wait — actually there is a subtle important bug candidate: the whole action is NOT wrapped in a transaction, and there is a flush inside before the notification; if `executeNotify` throws after the flush, the event and metadata remain persisted but the automation returns success:false with error. Then when automation runs again (retry?), since event exists as pendente, next run updates it. Consistent.
Also, executeCreateEsocialS2299Draft runs inside the automation loop; after it returns, other automations may also run.
OK. Time to finalize comments.
Let me decide on additional comments to add beyond confirmed ones (I must not repeat confirmed):
Given everything, I'll add the following NEW comments:
1. **Service — notifying "draft created" even when no draft/event was created** (medium, user-facing correctness). Location: line 15043-15050 (executeNotify config). Specifically: even when `$eventStatus === 'existing_not_editable'` or event null (missing data), the sent notification always says the draft was created. Actually for event null path, the return message says "dados eSocial pendentes impedem criar o evento oficial", yet the notification message says "O rascunho do S-2299 ... foi criado". For existing_not_editable, message says draft was created "a partir do offboarding", also misleading. I'll frame: adjust notification content per eventStatus to avoid telling the responsible a draft was created when it wasn't (event official já transmitido, ou dados ausentes). Medium severity.
2. **Migration — down() does not remove the template category product/workflow seed but also does not remove `flow_instances`? covered. Skip.
3. **Migration — flow_template settings 'modules' includes offboarding/esocial; not an issue.
4. **Migration — no tests for migration logic? Not a code issue.
5. **Service — intOrNull truncation for `indRemun`? indRemun integer field fine.
6. **New concrete: `cpfOrNull` does not validate CPF length; any digits string accepted (e.g., config typo with 3 digits) — will store invalid CPF in event draft; repository saveEventS2299 does same sanitize without validation; so consistent behavior. skip.
7. **New concrete: `dateOrNull` uses `new \DateTime($value)`. For value '2026-13-40' DateTime throws and returns null; that means invalid date config silently becomes null — fine.
8. Let me examine once more the interplay of the S-2299 default template automation being on the final stage entry, and the automation `on_offboarding_complete` in same stage for create_processo_seletivo. Actually a critical thought: When the member *enters* the final stage (Etapa 3), stage 3 on_enter triggers `create_esocial_s2299_draft`. That's fine. But the trigger event "employee enters stage" also triggers on the FIRST stage? The YAML's allowed trigger 'employee_enters_stage' means any stage entry.
Now is there any risk that the action also fires when the member is moved between companies? no.
One more potential genuine issue: **S-2299 draft/event is created keyed by trabalhador; the automation in final stage for offboarding could also match an employee whose S-2200 (admission) was never transmitted, in which case a S-2299 without admission event exists. But the guides are for review; skip.
I think I'll report the notification wording issue plus a possible **performance/size comment is already #7.
Wait, another NEW important one:
**In `sendChatNotification` change (#diff) the `$isSystemSender` filter reads `$config['system_sender']`. But `sendChatForRecipientType` calls `sendChatNotification($user, $subject, $chatBody, $member, $recipientType, $config)`, where `$config` is emailConfig from executeSendEmail (contains system_sender). BUT in the OTHER chat path used directly by other actions (e.g., BPM notifications), the `$config` passed may come from automation config that does NOT contain system_sender, meaning payroll flow messages remain as before. Good.
But there's a subtle regression: **Before, chat messages for payroll (`PayrollClosingBpmnService::SOURCE_TYPE`) went to the Adriana conversation (system sender). Now the check still includes source type, so same. But wait: the new code applies `$isSystemSender` for *any* recipient type when system_sender true, including `employee` etc. If an automation for an onboarding notifies the employee with system_sender=true, the message goes to the employee's private Adriana conversation instead of manager→employee. That's intended for S-2299.
Given the time, let me finalize with 2 new comments:
- Notification message should reflect event status.
- (maybe) In the migration, `ensureStage` matching by `LOWER(name)` can attach stages to templates previously created under the same seed if the user renamed... no.
Actually there's something about the migration I haven't verified: The new template has 3 *fixed* stages under an "offboarding" product in workflow "Fluxos de Saída". But if the workflow 'Fluxos de Saída' (slug fluxo-de-saida) exists already, it likely has an existing default template "offboarding padrão" with its own stages, and this new template is an alternative. If both templates are active default templates in the same workflow and product, then when creating a new offboarding the system might auto-pick the "first" default template, creating ambiguity / duplication for users (two offboarding default templates). This could also be covered by #2 (seed for all companies) but not exactly. Since the new template is named "Offboarding com eSocial (S-2299)" (a separate variant), the user picks a variant when creating flow. Wait — In offboarding creation UI, the user chooses template. That's fine.
Alright. Let me also confirm that `EsocialDadosTrabalhador` import exists at the top of the service (used in new code): file likely already imports because eSocial actions exist. `EsocialDadosRemuneracao` presumably imported too. If not imported, code would use FQCN? In the new code they refer to unqualified `EsocialDadosRemuneracao` and `EsocialDadosTrabalhador` — if those aren't imported at top of file, PHP resolves to `App\Service\EsocialDadosRemuneracao` and fails. Let me verify imports exist.
Tool Calls (1)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_patterns": ["src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"], "search_text": "use App\\Entity\\EsocialDadosTrabalhador|use App\\Entity\\EsocialDadosRemuneracao|use App\\Entity\\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento|use App\\Entity\\CompanyMembers|use App\\Entity\\OffboardingMember", "use_perl_regexp": true}
Result
Error: fatal: -e option, 'use App\Entity\EsocialDadosTrabalhador|use App\Entity\EsocialDadosRemuneracao|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento|use App\Entity\CompanyMembers|use App\Entity\OffboardingMember': unrecognized character follows \
Request #59
deepseek-v4-flash
P:121.24K C:156 CR:121.09K CW:0
2212ms
Reasoning
The regex pipe with use_perl_regexp got confused by shell escaping. Use simpler literal searches without regex. Let me search "EsocialDadosTrabalhador" as literal (case insensitive default), which may return many matches; but for the imports I can read the top of the file lines 1-80.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 120, "file_path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php", "start_line": 1}
Result
File: src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php (Total lines: 15468)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 1-120
1|<?php
2|
3|namespace App\Service;
4|
5|use App\Entity\FlowAutomation;
6|use App\Entity\FlowAutomationRequest;
7|use App\Entity\FlowInstance;
8|use App\Entity\FlowInstanceMember;
9|use App\Entity\FlowTemplate;
10|use App\Entity\FlowStage;
11|use App\Entity\CompanyMembers;
12|use App\Entity\User;
13|use App\Entity\CrmLeads;
14|use App\Entity\CrmOpportunity;
15|use App\Entity\CrmSalesManagement;
16|use App\Entity\CrmDefaultRegister;
17|use App\Entity\CrmKanbanOpportunities;
18|use App\Entity\CrmPerson;
19|use App\Entity\Company;
20|use App\Entity\IntermediateCrm;
21|use App\Entity\NpsInvite;
22|use App\Entity\NpsSurvey;
23|use App\Entity\NpsTemplate;
24|use App\Entity\ParticipantSession;
25|use App\Entity\Process;
26|use App\Entity\Payroll;
27|use App\Entity\PayrollCalculation;
28|use App\Entity\PaymentsTaxRates;
29|use App\Entity\Roles;
30|use App\Entity\TypeContract;
31|use App\Entity\EsocialDadosRemuneracao;
32|use App\Entity\EsocialDadosTrabalhador;
33|use App\Entity\EsocialS1000EvtInfoEmpregador;
34|use App\Entity\EsocialS1005EvtTabEstab;
35|use App\Entity\EsocialS1010EvtTabRubrica;
36|use App\Entity\EsocialS1020EvtTabLotacao;
37|use App\Entity\EsocialS1200EvtRemun;
38|use App\Entity\EsocialS1210EvtPgtos;
39|use App\Entity\EsocialS2200EvtAdmissao;
40|use App\Entity\EsocialS2299EvtDesligamento;
41|use App\Entity\StructuralResearchParticipant;
42|use App\Entity\StructuralResearchSurvey;
43|use App\Entity\UserProcess;
44|use App\Message\EnviarEventoMessage;
45|use Doctrine\ORM\EntityManagerInterface;
46|use Psr\Log\LoggerInterface;
47|use Symfony\Component\Mailer\MailerInterface;
48|use Symfony\Component\Mime\Email;
49|use Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\Exception\BadRequestHttpException;
50|use Symfony\Component\Routing\Generator\UrlGeneratorInterface;
51|use Symfony\Component\Routing\RouterInterface;
52|use Symfony\Component\Messenger\MessageBusInterface;
53|use Symfony\Contracts\HttpClient\HttpClientInterface;
54|use App\Service\CicloInicialService;
55|use App\Service\CycleOrchestratorMemberTransitionService;
56|use App\Service\CrmAutomationService;
57|use App\Service\CompanySenderGenerator;
58|use App\Service\OffboardingToRecruitmentService;
59|use App\Service\Products\FinancialFlowAutomationExecutor;
60|use App\Service\Products\FinancialFlowBpmnService;
61|use App\Service\Products\FinancialFlowModuleStructure;
62|use App\Service\Products\NpsBpmnService;
63|use App\Service\Products\PayrollClosingBpmnService;
64|use App\Service\Products\CrmBpmnService as CrmBpmnProductService;
65|use App\Service\Products\Assessment360BpmnService;
66|use App\Service\Products\PesquisaEstruturalBpmnService;
67|use App\Service\Products\PulseSurveyBpmnService;
68|use App\Service\NpsInviteSendService;
69|use Twig\Environment as TwigEnvironment;
70|
71|/**
72| * AutomationExecutionService - Motor de execução de automações
73| *
74| * Responsável por:
75| * - Executar ações das automações (send_email, notify, move_to_stage, etc.)
76| * - Avaliar condições das automações
77| * - Registrar execuções para auditoria
78| */
79|class AutomationExecutionService
80|{
81| private const REQUEST_TYPE_STRUCTURAL_RESEARCH_PUBLISH_APPROVAL = 'structural_research_publish_approval';
82| private const REQUEST_TYPE_PULSE_SURVEY_PUBLISH_APPROVAL = 'pulse_survey_publish_approval';
83| private const REQUEST_TYPE_ASSESSMENT360_PUBLISH_APPROVAL = 'assessment360_publish_approval';
84| private const METAHUMAN_JOURNEY_PARTICIPATION_SOURCE_TYPE = 'metahuman_journey_participation';
85|
86| private EntityManagerInterface $entityManager;
87| private HttpClientInterface $httpClient;
88| private ?MailerInterface $mailer;
89| private ?LoggerInterface $logger;
90| private ?CompanySenderGenerator $companySenderGenerator;
91| private ?TwigEnvironment $twig;
92| private ?OffboardingToRecruitmentService $offboardingToRecruitment;
93| private ?MemberPermissionService $memberPermissionService;
94| private ?RouterInterface $router;
95| private ?NpsBpmnService $npsBpmnService;
96| private ?CrmAutomationService $crmAutomationService;
97| private ?NpsInviteSendService $npsInviteSendService;
98| private ?PesquisaEstruturalBpmnService $pesquisaEstruturalBpmnService;
99| private ?PulseSurveyBpmnService $pulseSurveyBpmnService;
100| private ?Assessment360BpmnService $assessment360BpmnService;
101| private ?NpsSurveyEquivalentRecoveryApplier $npsSurveyEquivalentRecoveryApplier;
102| private ?ProductTemplateDefaultsApplier $productTemplateDefaultsApplier = null;
103| private ?JornadaMetahumanService $jornadaMetahumanService = null;
104| private ?\App\EventListener\FlowStageEventListener $flowStageEventListener = null;
105| private ?CicloInicialService $cicloInicialService = null;
106| private ?CycleOrchestratorMemberTransitionService $cycleOrchestratorMemberTransition = null;
107| private ?BpmnCommunicationCenterBridge $bpmnCcBridge = null;
108| private ?NotificationsCenterService $notificationsCenterService = null;
109| private ?MessageBusInterface $messageBus;
110| private ?FinancialFlowAutomationExecutor $financialFlowAutomationExecutor = null;
111|
112| // URL base do Flowable REST API
113| private string $flowableBaseUrl = 'http://localhost:8081/flowable-rest/service';
114| private array $flowableAuth = ['rest-admin', 'test'];
115|
116| public function __construct(
117| EntityManagerInterface $entityManager,
118| HttpClientInterface $httpClient,
119| ?MailerInterface $mailer = null,
120| ?LoggerInterface $logger = null,
Request #60
deepseek-v4-flash
P:123.05K C:3.47K CR:121.34K CW:0
24862ms
Reasoning
Imports all present. Good.
Now let me finalize the review and add new comments. Given the 7 confirmed findings are not to be repeated, I'll add a small number of high-confidence NEW comments:
New Comment 1 (service): **Notification sent even when the event status is 'existing_not_editable' or the draft couldn't be created because of missing data — the message text states "O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding", leading the responsible to search for a draft that was not created/updated.** Suggest making the notification message conditional on $eventStatus. Medium.
Let me find the exact code lines to anchor: lines 15043-15050 in the new file.
Existing code snippet to anchor:
```
$notification = $this->executeNotify([
'to' => 'company_member',
'company_member_id' => (string) $responsible->getId(),
'title' => 'Revisar desligamento eSocial (S-2299)',
'message' => 'O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding. Abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar os detalhes.',
```
I'll craft comment in pt-BR.
New Comment 2 (service): **dataDesligamento fallback to requestedAt** produces wrong dataDesligamento. Let me reconsider confidence. For an offboarding created with an employee whose dismissal date isn't filled, `requestedAt` equals when the offboarding request was made — but typically an offboarding is created *after* resignation with the dismissal date known. When it's not set, using requestedAt yields a wrong termination date being written into the official event row (status pendente) rather than leaving blank for the reviewer to fill. Because it persists into the official event table, this is data-integrity risk if the reviewer doesn't notice. Medium-low. Hmm. Honestly, most offboardings will have dismissal date set (used for other triggers). The fallback to requestedAt is dubious. I'll consider reporting as low severity. But "precision over recall" — I can report low severity quickly.
Actually, the fallback happens only if dismissalDate is null. In an offboarding flow where a dismissal date is required earlier, it'd be set. In cases where it's not yet known when the member enters final stage, this writes a wrong value. Risk: moderate. I'd rather mention the concern with "revisar se o requestedAt é semanticamente correto como data de desligamento".
Hmm — but the requirement test steps say "Adicionar um colaborador... Mover o membro até a etapa final" without necessarily setting dismissal date; so they'd get dataDesligamento = requestedAt — a fabricated date. This would write a wrong desligamento date into an official eSocial event. I think worth reporting medium.
Wait, actually in the "offboarding" product the dismissal/exit date is a real domain field (maybe stored in OffboardingMember.dismissalDate or on exit-date trigger). Let me not overstate. Report as low/medium "question this fallback".
New Comment 3 (service): **when no event/draft could be created, they still record `reviewUrl` and notify; combined with comment 1. I'll combine.
Let me also verify if the create event can persist with `setDtDeslig` etc fine; those are nullable so event can be created with null. The repository requires event with `dadosRemuneracao` non-null. OK.
Now comment 4 (migration): maybe not add since #1/#2 already.
What about the YAML — do I have any comment? I think none.
Templates (list_automations & flow_detail) — no comments. motivo_desligamento template — no comments.
Given that the confirmed findings plus 1-2 new comments suffice, let me finalize the comments via code_comment tool with precise diff-line anchors.
I must anchor to exact new lines in the diff for those two files.
For the notification message (executeNotify call), anchor to lines added in the diff:
```
$notification = $this->executeNotify([
'to' => 'company_member',
```
Let me pick a couple of consecutive lines exactly as in diff:
" $notification = $this->executeNotify([\n 'to' => 'company_member',\n 'company_member_id' => (string) $responsible->getId(),"
Anchoring within sliding window; I'll include up to the message line:
```
'message' => 'O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding. Abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar os detalhes.',
```
For the dismissalDate fallback:
```
$dismissalDate = $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate() ?? $offboardingMember->getRequestedAt();
```
Both lines are newly added lines.
Before writing, verify severity & category:
Comment 1 category bug, severity medium.
Comment 2 category bug, severity low/medium. Let me mark low since draft context.
Also maybe a comment about migration's duplication / keep? skip.
Wait — one more idea worth verifying because it could be a solid new finding: The default flow's final stage automation runs when entering the final stage; however, the offboarding "concluded" automation `create_processo_seletivo` also in the stage. If the offboarding template is for "eSocial S-2299", fine.
But note: In the migration, ensureStage looks up existing stage by name and reuses if found, but automations/activities are only seeded if missing per stage; if a previous partial run left stage 3 with only one of the two automations, the ensure would add the missing. good.
Let me also double check the template fix: The line uses `{{ prevEvts.termino.nrProcTrab }}` — with prevEvts.termino maybe a datetime/string of dtTerm etc. Twig autoescape numeric? Text field. fine.
Let me finalize now with the 2 new comments.
Actually, wait. Let me reconsider whether comment 1 (notification always says draft created) is truly a NEW issue vs duplicates. Confirmed #4 talks about overwriting pendente drafts (data loss). My comment is about the notification content being wrong when draft wasn't created/updated — distinct. #3 concerns rehire scenario for never creating a new draft; the misleading notification is a symptom of #3's scenario too. Hmm: When latest event is not pendente (previous official event transmitted), eventStatus = 'existing_not_editable', and the user gets notified "draft created". This is a direct consequence of #3's scenario. Since #3 is confirmed, the notification message inaccuracy is part of that same behavior. Might be considered overlapping but not duplicative; the message text claim is an independent, simpler user-facing bug regardless of the underlying reason (existing official event OR missing data). It's defensible as new.
Given reviewer guidance to avoid duplicating confirmed findings, I'll keep comment 1 but ensure it stands alone: focus purely on message/notification accuracy independent of #3 (missing data also triggers it).
OK, let me add comments.
Comment A (migration?) — maybe none.
Also, let me consider another independent new issue in the service: **When the responsible cannot be resolved, the action returns an error (success false) but does not write audit metadata nor notify; automation then fails with error string. In offboarding with no flow responsible set and config without responsible id, the draft (sourceMetadata) isn't even recorded — the action fails entirely.** That's acceptable.
Another one: the action executes when member enters final stage, but metadata is stored per FlowInstanceMember; the flow instance member is tied to the employee. Fine.
Let me now also think about the `company_member_id` in the notify config in executeNotify while `recipientContext` merging: `resolveRecipients('company_member', $member, $recipientContext)`. Wait, in executeNotify the recipients loop resolves `$users = $this->resolveRecipients($recipientType, $member, $recipientContext);` where $recipientContext merges context+config. But the S-2299 action's `executeNotify` is called with `$member` being the offboarding FlowInstanceMember, NOT the responsible. recipientType 'company_member', config has company_member_id = responsible id. Since context merges config, resolveRecipients finds company_member_id → responsible. Good. Notification then goes to responsible's user.
But note, `company_member_id` used for both recipient (responsible) and metadata `member_id` is the leaving employee. In resolveRecipients for `company_member` it uses context['company_member_id'] = responsible. Good.
Now in the in-app NotificationSpecialist we create notification for user (responsible). Then executeSendEmail gets emailConfig 'to' => $user->getEmail() resolved, etc. OK.
Now final: Add comments:
1. Service - notificação diz que rascunho foi criado mesmo quando não foi (existing_not_editable / missing data). Medium.
2. Service - dataDesligamento fallback para requestedAt. Low.
I should double check the exact diff lines text for anchors; new method lines are at 14927+ and are all new.
For comment 1, anchor lines:
```
$notification = $this->executeNotify([
'to' => 'company_member',
'company_member_id' => (string) $responsible->getId(),
```
Wait: those exact lines appear in the diff? The new code at 15043-15045:
```
$notification = $this->executeNotify([
'to' => 'company_member',
'company_member_id' => (string) $responsible->getId(),
```
Yes.
For comment 2, anchor: `$dismissalDate = $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate() ?? $offboardingMember->getRequestedAt();`
Both good.
Let me also add a migration-related new comment? I have an idea that is genuinely new and real: **In `ensureOffboardingStages`, the seeded default flow adds the S-2299 automation to the final stage for every company that gets the template — but the automation's code skips (returns skipped) when the company has eSocial disabled. Since the migration is creating the flow for all companies (including those without eSocial), the template advertises a feature that will silently never run for them, and the responsible at stage end gets no feedback.** This is basically a byproduct of #2. Skip.
Given that the migration and service are thoroughly covered by confirmed findings, final new comment set: two service comments.
Wait — but those two service comments should be double-checked not to duplicate confirmed #4/#3. #4 = overwrite; #1 = notification text; #2 = date fallback — distinct.
Additionally I realize I should think about whether to add a comment for the `list_automations`/`flow_detail` mapping key missing in the first function's list used by automation creation — skip.
Let me now write the code_comment with the two comments.
Actually, let me reconsider comment 2 severity and confidence again. In an offboarding for an employee whose resignation is happening today, `requestedAt` == dismissal date maybe. When would requestedAt != dismissal date? requestedAt is when the offboarding was created (by HR); the dismissal date is a planned date (maybe future, e.g., 30-day notice). If the member reaches the final stage *after* the dismissal date (offboarding concluded after exit) — but the final stage could also be reached after completing all activities while notice period still running. So dismissal date may still be in the future when the draft is created (final stage entry at 100% activities completion), and if the HR person didn't fill dismissalDate on the OffboardingMember, the payload would use requestedAt (past) rather than the intended future date. Data written to event = wrong. But do they fill dismissalDate elsewhere for the trigger exit_date? The exit date trigger exists in offboarding. If dismissalDate is typically set, fallback rarely fires. Confidence it's a real practical issue is moderate-low. Since it's a low-severity note, I'll include with "revise o fallback" wording.
Alright, also let me add one more high-value comment regarding the event lookup deduplication I found: When a *new* event is created, they set `indRetif(1)` (original). If the worker had previous S-2299 transmitted and gets re-hired + offboarded again — but #3 covers "existing_not_editable". Also when there is NO event for worker at all but the same worker data — fine.
OK final.
One more possible new concrete thing: **`findLatestEsocialS2299Event` orders by `id` DESC across the whole inheritance table; correct.
Let me write the final comments.
Concluí a revisão individual de todos os arquivos do grupo (YAML de automação, migration, service e os três templates). Os problemas principais já estavam registrados nos achados confirmados; ao revalidar o diff, identifiquei dois pontos novos que não se sobrepõem aos já confirmados e merecem registro.
Tool Calls (1)
code_comment
Show Details
Arguments
{"comments": [{"content": "Quando o evento S-2299 não é criado nem atualizado — porque já existe um evento oficial não editável (`existing_not_editable`) ou porque faltam dados de trabalhador/remuneração (`missing` não vazio) — o responsável ainda recebe a notificação padrão dizendo \"O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding\". Isso leva a pessoa a procurar um rascunho que não existe ou que não foi alterado, gerando confusão e retrabalho na revisão. A mensagem (e o título) enviados em `executeNotify` devem variar conforme `$eventStatus`/`$missing`, informando o que realmente aconteceu (evento já transmitido e não editável, ou dados eSocial pendentes), em vez de afirmar que o rascunho foi criado.", "existing_code": " $notification = $this->executeNotify([\n 'to' => 'company_member',\n 'company_member_id' => (string) $responsible->getId(),\n 'title' => 'Revisar desligamento eSocial (S-2299)',\n 'message' => 'O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding. Abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar os detalhes.',", "category": "bug", "severity": "medium", "path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"}, {"content": "Aqui a data de desligamento usada no rascunho cai para a data em que o offboarding foi solicitado quando `dismissalDate` ainda não foi preenchida. Na prática, a data de início do processo não é a data de desligamento (o aviso pode ser de 30+ dias), então um valor incorreto pode ser gravado no evento S-2299 pendente e seguir para o eSocial se o responsável não perceber na revisão. O mais seguro é deixar `dataDesligamento` vazio nesse cenário para o responsável preencher, em vez de assumir `requestedAt` como data de desligamento.", "existing_code": " $dismissalDate = $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate() ?? $offboardingMember->getRequestedAt();", "category": "bug", "severity": "low", "path": "src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php"}]}
Result
(async)
Request #61
deepseek-v4-flash
P:126.53K C:742 CR:126.46K CW:0
6193ms
Reasoning
Comments added. Now let me make sure I've given each file its own pass:
1. config/automations/offboarding.yaml — reviewed keys, structure consistency with other entries; no spelling errors; placement category noted but not an issue.
2. migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php — reviewed thoroughly; main issues already in confirmed findings (#1, #2); further structural comparisons against existing seeds showed consistency.
3. src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php — reviewed thoroughly; confirmed #3-#7 plus my two new comments.
4. templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig — reviewed; the fix is correct and consistent with other conditions in same template.
5. templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig — label addition consistent.
6. templates/decision_system/flow_detail.html.twig — label addition consistent.
No further real issues identified. I should provide a summary and then call task_done.
Revisão concluída. Resumo da análise dos 6 arquivos do grupo:
**config/automations/offboarding.yaml** — Chaves do novo bloco (`id`, `type`, `title`, `icon`, `has_config`, `allowed_triggers`, `blocked_triggers`, `blocked_trigger_message`, `description`, `config_preset`) consistentes com as demais entradas; sem erros de grafia nas chaves. O agrupamento em `movement` é questionável do ponto de vista de UI, mas não é defeito funcional.
**migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php** — Estrutura de inserts comparada com seeds anteriores (`Version20260518151423`, `Version20260519173602`) e com os templates padrão de offboarding do `DecisionSystemController`; formato consistente. Problemas principais (cascade no `down()`, seed global por empresa, ativação global do produto) já constam nos achados confirmados.
**src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php** — Verifiquei existência de imports, setters herdados de `EsocialEvents`, métodos de repositório, fluxo de `executeNotify`/`executeSendEmail`/`sendChatNotification` e propagação do `system_sender`. Além dos achados confirmados (#3–#7), adicionei dois comentários novos: (1) notificação afirma que o rascunho foi criado mesmo quando o evento não foi criado/atualizado; (2) fallback de `dataDesligamento` para `requestedAt` pode gravar data incorreta no evento eSocial.
**templates/company/member_guides_esocial_termino/motivo_desligamento.html.twig** — Correção alinhada com as demais condições do template (`prevEvts.termino`); sem novos problemas.
**templates/decision_system/automations/list_automations.html.twig** e **flow_detail.html.twig** — Apenas inclusão de rótulo para a nova ação, em mapa consistente com as chaves de execução do service; sem problemas.
Tool Calls (1)
task_done
Show Details
Arguments
{"state": "DONE"}
review_filter_task
Request #1
deepseek-v4-flash
P:15.11K C:1.47K CR:1.92K CW:0
11507ms
Reasoning
Let me analyze each comment carefully.
The comments are about the diffs. Let me go through them.
c-0: about the migration down() deleting templates with FK cascade, plus not removing workflows/workflow_products or reverting active=1, leaving orphaned data. The subject is migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php.
Protected subjects? Behavioral/compatibility change? It's about data deletion behavior in a migration rollback. Hmm. Is it memory safety? No. Concurrency? No. Linkage? No. Behavioral/compatibility change — a rollback deleting data... This is about data semantics. Let me check the ground.
The comment claims down() deletes templates but doesn't remove workflows/workflow_products created by up() nor revert active=1. Looking at the diff, down() deletes flow_automations, flow_activities, flow_stages, flow_template_products, flow_templates. It does NOT delete workflows, workflow_products, and does not revert products.active=1. And up() does set products active=1 via ensureProduct UPDATE... and creates workflows via ensureWorkflow, workflow_products via ensureWorkflowProduct. So the claim "rollback não remove os workflows/workflow_products criados pelo up() nem reverte o active=1 do produto, deixando dados órfãos" is supported by the diff — the down() doesn't do these things. Actually wait, the down() deletes by seed_migration key in flow_templates settings. The workflows are keyed by company + slug 'fluxo-de-saida', not by seed key. So down() only deletes flow templates. The claim is accurate given the diff.
The FK cascade claim (flow_instances.flow_template_id has FK with ON DELETE CASCADE) — that's about code not in the diff (flow_instances table schema). Can't verify. But the claim about orphaned data is verifiable from diff. The comment's central claim is that down() is destructive and leaves orphaned data. That's true from the diff. So approve.
Actually is this a protected subject? "Behavioral or compatibility change"? A migration's down deleting things — arguably. But regardless, the comment is factually correct based on diff. Approve.
c-1: about seeding per-company creating workflows/templates for tenants that don't use offboarding/eSocial and forcing products.active=1 globally. Subject is the migration. Looking at diff: up() fetches all company ids and creates workflow/template for each. ensureProduct sets active = 1. So the comment's claim is supported by diff. It also references "Migrations anteriores só semearam quando o workflow já existia" — code not visible, can't verify, but not central claim contradictory. Approve.
c-2: about event search not tied to offboarding, reusing pending draft. Subject: AutomationExecutionService.php. It discusses runtime behavior/logic. Is it protected? Possibly behavioral. Let's check: it's about a scenario where a previous desligamento was transmitted. From diff: findLatestEsocialS2299Event finds latest event by trabalhador, ordered by id DESC. If latest event status !== 'pendente', eventStatus = 'existing_not_editable' and no new event is created. So the claim is consistent with diff — could be wrong behaviorally but matches the code. Approve (unverifiable and matches code reading).
c-3: about rewriting pending draft fields with empty payload. From diff: applyEsocialS2299Payload sets fields from payload with stringOrNull/dateOrNull which turn '' into null. And in the default template, actionConfig has only 'to' and '_default_automation_id'. So yes payload fields are empty, causing overwrite with null. The claim is supported by code reading. This involves reasoning about template defaults, but diff shows actionConfig in migration only contains 'to' and '_default_automation_id'. Consistent. Approve.
c-4: about not validating responsible belongs to same company. From diff: resolveEsocialS2299Responsible finds CompanyMembers by id and returns it without company check. Claim consistent. Approve.
c-5: about pensAlim/vrAlim int truncation. This is about decimal(10,2) column etc. That requires knowledge of DB schema not in diff. The comment claims intOrNull truncates decimals. From diff: intOrNull casts to int, so "1234.56" becomes 1234. That's a fact from diff. Whether it's wrong depends on intended semantics. The claim says values like vrAlim with decimals would be truncated. That's a factual observation about the code. Could be behavioral concern. Approve — it's about potential data issue, arguably protected behavioral. Even if not, it's not contradicted by diff.
c-6: about the class being too big and suggesting extracting service. Style/architecture. Is it protected? It's not memory safety etc. But is it true of this diff? It claims the PR adds ~330 lines to a 15k-line class. The diff adds ~330 lines (14924 + 330 = 15254 end). Yes the diff adds about 330 lines of new method. And the class is big. The claim about it being 15k lines - the diff shows line 14920 context and 13903, and ending around 15254. So yes class passes 15k lines. The statement is true. Style/architecture comment, what it states is true. Approve per value veto.
So all comments seem accurate per the diff. Are there any that are factually wrong?
Let me double-check each against potential ground A or B.
c-0: The comment's subject is the migration file, which is in the diff. Code exists. Fine.
Actually, wait. Let me reconsider c-0 regarding FK cascade claim. It asserts "flow_instances.flow_template_id tem FK com ON DELETE CASCADE". This is a claim about a schema not in the diff. But the comment is filed against the migration. It describes down() behavior which is in the diff. The cascade claim is unverifiable, but central claim stands regardless. Approve.
c-1: claims migrations anteriores semearam apenas quando workflow já existia — unverifiable but not contradicted.
Everything else matches the code.
So the answer: approve all comments.
Let me make sure none of the comments target code absent from the subject file.
All subjects are files present in diff. c-0 through c-6 all target code present in respective diffs.
Ground B contradictions? None.
Now consider protected subjects: c-0 concerns data deletion / cascade = behavioral/compatibility for migrations. c-2 through c-5 behavioral concerns. All protected anyway. Approve.
So approve_all_comments.
Tool Calls (1)
approve_all_comments
Show Details
Arguments
{}
Request #2
deepseek-v4-flash
P:13.94K C:1.5K CR:7.55K CW:0
11432ms
Reasoning
Let me analyze the two review comments.
Comment c-0 targets `src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php` and discusses the `executeNotify` call where the notification message always says the draft was created regardless of `$eventStatus`/`$missing`. This is about behavior — the message sent. Let me look at the diff.
In the diff, the code contains:
```php
$notification = $this->executeNotify([
'to' => 'company_member',
'company_member_id' => (string) $responsible->getId(),
'title' => 'Revisar desligamento eSocial (S-2299)',
'message' => 'O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding. Abra o chat com a Adriana para revisar os detalhes.',
'message_html' => '<p>O rascunho do S-2299 de {{member_name}} foi criado a partir do offboarding.</p>...',
'system_sender' => true,
], $member, array_merge($context, [...]));
```
Indeed the message is unconditional — always says "O rascunho do S-2299 ... foi criado" regardless of eventStatus. The return message after does vary, but the notification message doesn't. So the comment's central claim is that the notification message is constant regardless of the scenario, and suggests varying it. This is true per the diff.
Wait — is this a behavioral/compatibility concern (protected)? Actually the comment is about the behavior of the message being misleading. Hmm. The protected subject vetoes include behavioral or compatibility change. But this comment is not about a change; it's about a design flaw in new code. Is the comment's subject a "behavioral change"? No, it's about newly-added code and its behavior. Actually protected subjects are categories where wrongly removing is expensive. Let me think: the comment says the notification message always claims the draft was created even when no draft was created. That is a claim about the code's behavior — factual. The diff literally shows the message is unconditional and the return value logic conditions on eventStatus. The comment describes code that exists in the diff. So it's not Ground A (the code is in the diff). Ground B — does any diff line literally contradict? The comment says the notification always says the draft was created even when eventStatus is existing_not_editable or missing non-empty. The diff shows the notification message is indeed constant. So no contradiction. The comment is correct actually.
But wait — is the subject protected (behavioral change)? This comment is about a new feature's notification message. Hmm, "Behavioral or compatibility change — a message, field, status, or default that the old code produced and the new code no longer does". This comment is not about old vs new code. It's not a change. So not protected by that.
Memory safety? No. Concurrency? No. Linkage? No. Unused parameter? No.
So we assess correctness. The comment seems correct per the diff. Approve.
Comment c-1: "Aqui a data de desligamento usada no rascunho cai para a data em que o offboarding foi solicitado quando dismissalDate ainda não foi preenchida... o mais seguro é deixar dataDesligamento vazio." Existing code line: `$dismissalDate = $offboardingMember->getDismissalDate() ?? $offboardingMember->getRequestedAt();`
This line appears in the diff. The comment discusses the fallback behavior. It's a behavioral/semantic recommendation about runtime behavior of business. It's not factually contradicted by the diff. The line indeed does the fallback. Whether requestedAt is "data em que o offboarding foi solicitado" — we can't fully verify the semantics of getRequestedAt, but the diff shows the fallback. The comment is about runtime behavior / business semantics. It's a suggestion, not factually wrong. Approve.
Both comments should be approved. Actually wait, let me reconsider whether either comment qualifies for removal.
Ground A: The code they describe is present in the subject file's diff. Both are present.
Ground B: No diff line literally contradicts. Both comments' claims match the code shown.
So approve both.
Let me double check c-0's subject — could it be "behavioral change" protected? The comment is essentially criticizing that the notification is misleading in certain states. The notification message is fixed text. The return message varies, which shows the author was aware of states. The commenter notes that the notification doesn't vary. That's a claim that the code is deficient. But is it factually wrong? No, the message is indeed fixed.
Hmm, but there is a subtlety: is the claim "isso leva a pessoa a procurar um rascunho que não existe" — a behavioral consequence, could be argued as wrong if some draft is still created. Actually in the missing case, the payload is stored in metadata and... let me check. In the missing case (esocialTrabalhador not instance, or remuneracao not instance), event is null, eventStatus 'draft_only' or... wait.
Let me trace: `$eventStatus = 'draft_only'; $missing = [];` initial. If `!$esocialTrabalhador instanceof ...` then missing[] = esocial_worker_data, event stays null, eventStatus stays 'draft_only'. Then if remuneracao not instance, missing[] = esocial_remuneration_data, event null. In else branch: eventStatus could be 'existing_not_editable', 'updated', 'created'.
So in the missing case, eventStatus is 'draft_only' and missing non-empty. Return message: `$eventStatus === 'existing_not_editable' ? '...já existe evento oficial...' : 'Rascunho do S-2299 registrado; dados eSocial pendentes impedem criar o evento oficial'`. Hmm, interesting: for missing case with eventStatus 'draft_only', message says "Rascunho registrado; dados pendentes impedem criar evento oficial". And metadata stores the payload. So arguably a "draft" (payload) is still registered in metadata. The comment c-0 says "O responsável ainda recebe a notificação padrão dizendo ... o responsável procura um rascunho que não existe ou que não foi alterado".
But is the notification message claim factually contradicted? The notification text is fixed: "O rascunho do S-2299 ... foi criado". Yes it is. The comment's central claim about the notification being unconditional is true. The commentary about confusing the user is reasoning/opinion. The comment is not factually wrong per the diff. Approve.
Both approved. So call approve_all_comments.
Let me write analysis anyway.
Tool Calls (1)
approve_all_comments
Show Details
Arguments
{}
tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php 8 requests
main_task
Request #1
deepseek-v4-flash
P:7.72K C:256 CR:2.69K CW:0
1843ms
Reasoning
Let me analyze the code changes in the review file:
`tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php`
The changes are:
1. Renamed a test method from `testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoMedicoExigeCaracterizar` to `testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoMedicoComSuspeitaExigeCaracterizar`
2. Added `'descaracter_suspect' => '1'` to the test data.
Let me look at the test file to understand the context. Let me read the test file around these lines.
Tool Calls (2)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php", "start_line": 800, "end_line": 920}
Result
File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php (Total lines: 990)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 800-920
800| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
801| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
802| 'location' => 'Linha 2',
803| 'description' => 'Toast da imagem — etapa 2 incompleta',
804| 'aprofundamento_complete' => true,
805| 'details' => [
806| 'activity' => 'Operação de corte',
807| 'approach' => 'CORRECAO_OPERACIONAL',
808| 'person_id' => '101',
809| 'person_type' => 'COLABORADOR',
810| 'had_injury' => true,
811| ],
812| ]);
813|
814| $joined = implode("\n", $errors);
815|
816| // Não pode mais aparecer o texto técnico do print antigo.
817| self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.injury_type:', $joined);
818| self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.injury_classification:', $joined);
819| self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.descaracterizado:', $joined);
820| self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.potential_consequence:', $joined);
821| self::assertStringNotContainsString('consequence: obrigatório', $joined);
822|
823| self::assertTrue(
824| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Consequência real é obrigatória')),
825| "Faltou mensagem de consequência real. Erros:\n{$joined}"
826| );
827| self::assertTrue(
828| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Consequência potencial é obrigatória')),
829| "Faltou mensagem de consequência potencial. Erros:\n{$joined}"
830| );
831| self::assertTrue(
832| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Consequência potencial / Gravidade é obrigatória')),
833| "Faltou mensagem de gravidade. Erros:\n{$joined}"
834| );
835| self::assertTrue(
836| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Tipo de lesão é obrigatório quando há lesão')),
837| "Faltou mensagem humana de tipo de lesão. Erros:\n{$joined}"
838| );
839| self::assertTrue(
840| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Classificação da lesão é obrigatória quando há lesão')),
841| "Faltou mensagem humana de classificação. Erros:\n{$joined}"
842| );
843| self::assertFalse(
844| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'caracterizado como acidente')),
845| "Caracterizar não deve ser exigido na criação. Erros:\n{$joined}"
846| );
847| }
848|
849| public function testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoMedicoComSuspeitaExigeCaracterizar(): void
850| {
851| $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
852|
853| $errors = $validator->validate([
854| 'type' => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_PESSOAL,
855| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
856| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
857| 'location' => 'Linha 2',
858| 'description' => 'Médico finalizando aprofundamento',
859| 'aprofundamento_complete' => true,
860| 'aprofundamento_only' => true,
861| 'nature' => 'CORTE',
862| 'agent' => 'FERRAMENTA',
863| 'consequence' => 'LESAO_LEVE',
864| 'impacts' => ['PESSOA'],
865| 'details' => [
866| 'activity' => 'Operação de corte',
867| 'approach' => 'TREINAMENTO',
868| 'strategic_nature' => 'SEGURANCA',
869| 'barrier_type' => 'FISICA',
870| 'potential_consequence' => 'LESAO_MODERADA',
871| 'potential_severity' => 'MODERADO',
872| 'person_id' => '101',
873| 'person_type' => 'COLABORADOR',
874| 'had_injury' => true,
875| 'injury_type' => 'CORTE',
876| 'injury_severity' => 'LEVE',
877| 'injury_classification' => 'FAC',
878| 'descaracter_suspect' => '1',
879| 'body_parts' => [
880| ['region' => 'MAO', 'side' => 'DIREITA', 'injury_type' => 'CORTE'],
881| ],
882| ],
883| ]);
884|
885| self::assertTrue(
886| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'caracterizado como acidente')),
887| 'Médico deve informar se foi caracterizado. Erros: ' . implode(' | ', $errors)
888| );
889| }
890|
891| public function testPayloadComInjuryTypePreenchidoDisparaValidacaoAprofundamento(): void
892| {
893| $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
894|
895| $errors = $validator->validate([
896| 'type' => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_PESSOAL,
897| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
898| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
899| 'location' => 'Linha 2',
900| 'description' => 'Enviou injury_type sem completar aprofundamento',
901| 'details' => [
902| 'activity' => 'Operação',
903| 'approach' => 'CORRECAO_OPERACIONAL',
904| 'person_id' => '101',
905| 'person_type' => 'COLABORADOR',
906| 'injury_type' => 'CORTE',
907| 'had_injury' => true,
908| ],
909| ]);
910|
911| self::assertNotEmpty($errors);
912| $joined = implode(' | ', $errors);
913| self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.injury_type:', $joined);
914| self::assertTrue(
915| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Consequência real')),
916| 'Com injury_type preenchido deve exigir aprofundamento. Erros: ' . $joined
917| );
918| }
919|
920| public function testAcidentePessoalEtapa1SemPessoaRetornaMensagemHumana(): void
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "descaracter_suspect"}
Result
File: GUIA_MERGE_TAB_OCCURRENCES.md
Match lines: 2
232| data-descaracter-suspect="{{ occ.descaracter_suspect|default(0) }}"
252| data-descaracter-suspect="{{ occ.descaracter_suspect|default(0) }}"
File: RESUMO_MAURICIO_MARCOS.md
Match lines: 1
136| data-descaracter-suspect="{{ occ.descaracter_suspect|default(0) }}"
File: docs/ssma/CORRECOES-FECHAMENTO-FIGMA-PENDENTES.md
Match lines: 1
81|| Há suspeita de descaracterização | `suspeita_sim` | `descaracter_suspect = 1` |
File: docs/ssma/ocorrencia-06-tudo-na-caixinha-descaracter.md
Match lines: 1
27|| Persistência ocorrência | `#ev_descaracter_suspect` + `#ev_descaracterizado` (hiddens sincronizados) |
File: docs/ssma/ocorrencia-07-suspeita-descaracterizacao-ui.md
Match lines: 1
20|| Suspeita marcada | `descaracter_suspect` | `1` |
File: docs/ssma/ocorrencia-08-filtro-aprofundamento-descaracter.md
Match lines: 1
14|| Há suspeita de descaracterização | `suspeita_sim` | `descaracter_suspect = 1` |
File: src/Controller/SsmaController.php
Match lines: 6
14187| 'descaracter_suspect' => !empty($details['descaracter_suspect']) ? 1 : 0,
26687| 'injured_person_details', 'descaracter_suspect', 'descaracterizado', 'descaracter_comment', 'witness_ids',
26783| foreach (['descaracter_suspect', 'descaracterizado', 'descaracter_comment'] as $descKey) {
26795| if (isset($details['descaracter_suspect'])) {
26796| $details['descaracter_suspect'] = !empty($details['descaracter_suspect']) && $details['descaracter_suspect'] !== '0' ? 1 : 0;
27031| 'descaracter_suspect',
File: src/Service/Ssma/Export/SsmaOccurrenceExportRowMapper.php
Match lines: 1
156| 'ap_descaracter_suspect' => SsmaOccurrenceExportLabels::boolLabel($d['descaracter_suspect'] ?? null),
File: src/Service/Ssma/Export/SsmaOccurrenceExportSchema.php
Match lines: 1
76| 'ap_descaracter_suspect' => 'Suspeita de descaracterização?',
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaAutomationService.php
Match lines: 2
648| $suspect = ($payload['descaracter_suspect'] ?? '0') === '1';
2031| $payload['descaracter_suspect'] = !empty($details['descaracter_suspect']) ? '1' : '0';
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaEventService.php
Match lines: 5
161| 'descaracter_suspect', 'descaracterizado', 'descaracter_comment',
186| if (!empty($card['descaracter_suspect'])) {
187| $details['descaracter_suspect'] = 1;
188| } elseif (array_key_exists('descaracter_suspect', $card)) {
189| $details['descaracter_suspect'] = 0;
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaEventValidator.php
Match lines: 1
719| $hasSuspect = !empty($d['descaracter_suspect']) && $d['descaracter_suspect'] !== '0';
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/partials/_modal_event.html.twig
Match lines: 11
291| <input class="form-check-input" type="checkbox" id="ev_descaracter_suspect" name="ev_descaracter_suspect" value="1">
292| <label class="form-check-label" for="ev_descaracter_suspect">Há suspeita de descaracterização do acidente?</label>
2197| descaracter_suspect: evIsDescaracterSuspectChecked() ? 1 : 0,
2905| var el = document.getElementById('ev_descaracter_suspect');
5728| var suspectChk = document.getElementById('ev_descaracter_suspect');
5746| var globalChk = document.getElementById('ev_descaracter_suspect');
6474| var suspectRaw = det.descaracter_suspect != null ? det.descaracter_suspect : data.descaracter_suspect;
6476| evSetChk('ev_descaracter_suspect', suspectOn);
7092| var suspectEl = document.getElementById('ev_descaracter_suspect');
7108| payload.descaracter_suspect = evIsDescaracterSuspectChecked() ? 1 : 0;
7125| suspectEl.checked = !!payload.descaracter_suspect;
File: templates/ssma/occurrence/tabs/_tab_occurrences.html.twig
Match lines: 3
455| data-descaracter-suspect="{{ occ.descaracter_suspect|default(0) }}"
1636| ' data-descaracter-suspect="' + escapeHtml(String(occurrenceData.descaracter_suspect ? 1 : 0)) + '"' +
1714| rowNode.setAttribute('data-descaracter-suspect', occurrenceData.descaracter_suspect ? '1' : '0');
File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php
Match lines: 1
878| 'descaracter_suspect' => '1',
Request #2
deepseek-v4-flash
P:11.14K C:144 CR:7.94K CW:0
1611ms
Reasoning
The change is only in a unit test. Let me understand the validator logic. Let me read the validator around line 719 to understand what `descaracter_suspect` does.
Let me read SsmaEventValidator.php around line 700-750.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"file_path": "src/Service/Ssma/SsmaEventValidator.php", "start_line": 680, "end_line": 780}
Result
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaEventValidator.php (Total lines: 887)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 680-780
680| }
681| if ($workLeave === 'TOTAL' && $injClass !== '' && !\in_array($injClass, ['LTI', 'LTI_FATALIDADE', 'LTI_INCAPACITANTE', 'FAT'], true)) {
682| $errors[] = 'Com afastamento total, a classificação deve ser FAT ou LTI — Afastamento.';
683| }
684| if ($workLeave === 'NAO' && $injClass !== '' && !\in_array($injClass, ['FAC', 'MTC', 'RWC'], true)) {
685| $errors[] = 'Sem afastamento, use apenas FAC, MTC ou RWC.';
686| }
687|
688| if ($hadInjury) {
689| if (isset($d['body_location_detail']) && $d['body_location_detail'] !== null && $d['body_location_detail'] !== '') {
690| if (!\is_string($d['body_location_detail'])) {
691| $errors[] = 'Detalhe da localização no corpo deve ser texto.';
692| } elseif (mb_strlen((string) $d['body_location_detail']) > 2000) {
693| $errors[] = 'Detalhe da localização no corpo: no máximo 2000 caracteres.';
694| }
695| }
696| /* hand_finger / foot_toe no nível details: legado (MAO/PE sem lado); preferir por body_parts[]. */
697| $allowedHandFlat = ['POLEGAR', 'INDICADOR', 'MEDIO', 'ANULAR', 'MINIMO'];
698| $allowedFootFlat = ['HALUX', 'SEGUNDO_DEDO', 'TERCEIRO_DEDO', 'QUARTO_DEDO', 'MINIMO_PE'];
699| if (!empty($d['hand_finger'])) {
700| foreach (array_filter(array_map('trim', explode(',', (string) $d['hand_finger']))) as $v) {
701| if (!\in_array($v, $allowedHandFlat, true)) {
702| $errors[] = 'Dedo da mão inválido: ' . $v;
703| }
704| }
705| }
706| if (!empty($d['foot_toe'])) {
707| foreach (array_filter(array_map('trim', explode(',', (string) $d['foot_toe']))) as $v) {
708| if (!\in_array($v, $allowedFootFlat, true)) {
709| $errors[] = 'Dedo do pé inválido: ' . $v;
710| }
711| }
712| }
713| }
714|
715| $descVal = array_key_exists('descaracterizado', $d) ? (string) $d['descaracterizado'] : '';
716| // Caracterizar é do médico no aprofundamento dedicado — não na criação.
717| // Sim/Não + comentário só são obrigatórios quando há suspeita de descaracterização marcada.
718| if (!empty($data['aprofundamento_only'])) {
719| $hasSuspect = !empty($d['descaracter_suspect']) && $d['descaracter_suspect'] !== '0';
720| if ($hasSuspect) {
721| if (!\in_array($descVal, ['0', '1'], true)) {
722| $errors[] = 'Informe se o evento é caracterizado como acidente (Sim/Não).';
723| } else {
724| $comment = trim((string) ($d['descaracter_comment'] ?? ''));
725| if ($comment === '') {
726| $errors[] = 'Comentário de caracterização do acidente é obrigatório.';
727| }
728| }
729| }
730| }
731|
732| return $errors;
733| }
734|
735| private function validateAcidenteMaterial(array $d): array
736| {
737| $errors = [];
738|
739| if (empty($d['potential_severity']) || !PotentialSeverityEnum::isValid($d['potential_severity'])) {
740| $errors[] = 'Consequência potencial / Gravidade é obrigatória. Selecione uma opção válida.';
741| }
742|
743| if (empty($d['asset_type'])) {
744| $errors[] = 'Tipo de ativo é obrigatório para Acidente Material.';
745| }
746| if (!isset($d['operational_impact'])) {
747| $errors[] = 'Impacto operacional é obrigatório.';
748| }
749| // Barreira que falhou removida do formulário AM (Brenda) — legado opcional.
750| if (!empty($d['failed_barrier']) && !FailedBarrierEnum::isValid((string) $d['failed_barrier'])) {
751| $errors[] = 'Barreira que falhou: valor inválido.';
752| }
753| if (empty($d['barrier_type']) || !BarrierTypeEnum::isValid((string) $d['barrier_type'])) {
754| $errors[] = 'Tipo de barreira é obrigatório. Selecione uma opção válida.';
755| }
756|
757| return $errors;
758| }
759|
760| private function validateAcidenteAmbiental(array $d): array
761| {
762| $errors = [];
763|
764| if (empty($d['potential_severity']) || !PotentialSeverityEnum::isValid($d['potential_severity'])) {
765| $errors[] = 'Consequência potencial / Gravidade é obrigatória. Selecione uma opção válida.';
766| }
767|
768| if (empty($d['environmental_medium']) || !EnvironmentalMediumEnum::isValid((string) $d['environmental_medium'])) {
769| $errors[] = 'Meio ambiental é obrigatório. Selecione uma opção válida.';
770| }
771| // Formulário novo envia PollutantTypeEnum. Texto livre já gravado (legado) também
772| // passa, para não bloquear re-save de eventos antigos.
773| $pollutant = trim((string) ($d['pollutant_type'] ?? ''));
774| if ($pollutant === '') {
775| $errors[] = 'Tipo de poluente é obrigatório. Selecione uma opção válida.';
776| }
777| if (!isset($d['containment_done'])) {
778| $errors[] = 'Informe se houve contenção.';
779| }
780| // external_impact: removido do cadastro (Parte 1 C7) — opcional/legado, não bloqueia save.
Request #3
deepseek-v4-flash
P:12.9K C:2.42K CR:11.26K CW:0
16916ms
Reasoning
Now, the test change. The test was renamed to `testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoMedicoComSuspeitaExigeCaracterizar` and `descaracter_suspect => '1'` was added. This is to test the "suspect" characterization path — since the validator only requires characterization when there's a suspect of descaracterização (`hasSuspect` true).
Wait — but the test's payload contains `descaracter_suspect = '1'` but doesn't contain `descaracterizado` or `descaracter_comment`. So the test expects the error message 'caracterizado como acidente'. Let me check: at line 718-729, if `aprofundamento_only` is truthy, and `hasSuspect` is true (descaracter_suspect = '1'), then:
- if `descaracterizado` not in ['0','1'], error 'Informe se o evento é caracterizado como acidente (Sim/Não).'
Wait, the message is 'caracterizado como acidente'. Let me check the test assertion: `str_contains($e, 'caracterizado como acidente')`. The message contains "Informe se o evento é caracterizado como acidente (Sim/Não)." That contains 'caracterizado como acidente'. OK.
So the test appears to be consistent with validator logic. This is a test-only change. But the test data now has `descaracter_suspect` set to '1', but not `descaracterizado` nor `descaracter_comment`. That's fine for this test which asserts that characterization message is required.
But wait — what's the point of the change? This test was previously named `testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoMedicoExigeCaracterizar` and presumably passed without `descaracter_suspect`. Hmm, but with the validator logic at line 718-729, characterization is only required when `hasSuspect` is true. So the old test (without `descaracter_suspect`) would NOT have triggered the error... So the test would have failed before this change? Or was the validator changed separately?
Wait, actually this diff only touches the test file. The test was renamed and `descaracter_suspect => '1'` added. This is likely a fix so that the test matches the new validator behavior (that characterization is only required when there's a suspect). But since only the test file is in review group, we should consider whether the test change is consistent.
Now, is the new test name and data correct? The test asserts the error message is present. It contains both suspect (so it goes into validation). The message asserted: 'caracterizado como acidente'. If `descaracterizado` is not set, message at line 722 will be produced. Good.
But there's a subtle issue: the comment 'Médico deve informar se foi caracterizado.' Yet with `descaracter_suspect = '1'`, the payload doesn't include `descaracterizado`. That triggers 'Informe se o evento é caracterizado como acidente (Sim/Não).' OK.
Let me verify whether the test as a whole is now valid. Also, does the new name accurately describe the test? The name: `testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoMedicoComSuspeitaExigeCaracterizar` — "acidente pessoal com aprofundamento médico com suspeita exige caracterizar" — yes, matches the new validator behavior requiring characterization only when suspect is marked.
Is this test related to the PR scope (offboarding esocial workflow)? The PR seems unrelated to the Ssma test... but the commit `747b40fb40 fix(tests): add suspect characterization field` indicates this test was fixed because of some change. Wait, but the other changed files (AutomationExecutionService, migration, etc.) seem unrelated to SsmaEventValidator. Hmm.
Actually let me check the merge context. The commit history includes "Merge branch 'new_production'" — this may be a sync merge. The SsmaEventValidatorTest change may be part of a sync with new_production? Actually commit 747b40fb40 is "fix(tests): add suspect characterization field" which is in this branch.
Hmm, but wait. Let me consider whether the test would pass. The test scenario has `descaracter_suspect => '1'` but no `descaracterizado`. Actually wait — is it odd that the test asserts only the error about "caracterizado como acidente" but the validator with `descaracterizado` missing produces exactly that message. Good.
But is there possibly an issue: the test now does NOT test that the payload is valid overall; the payload lacks `descaracter_comment`, but that only matters if `descaracterizado` is '0' or '1'. Since `descaracterizado` is absent, only the first error is generated. The test asserts that error is present. Fine.
Now, what if this test change is a test-only change that's consistent, it might be fine. Let me think about whether there's any defect.
Potential concern: the test data `'descaracter_suspect' => '1'` but the naming of test indicates "ComSuspeita". The previous test name was without "ComSuspeita", and the payload previously (before change) didn't include suspect — would the previous version have failed? Let me reconstruct what the validator did before. Since the diff only shows test changes, we don't see validator changes. Maybe validator behavior changed in an earlier commit in this PR (the branch has commits for other things). Actually the validator line comments say "Caracterizar é do médico no aprofundamento dedicado — não na criação. Sim/Não + comentário só são obrigatórios quando há suspeita de descaracterização marcada." That validator change may have landed via a merge from new_production or another PR. The test fix aligns with new validator behavior.
But is this test change inside the review file in scope? We should review test correctness. The test passes presumably.
Let me consider possible issues:
1. The test name is long but fine.
2. The scenario seems semantically correct: for "aprofundamento médico com suspeita", the validator should require characterizing.
3. Is it a good idea that the test doesn't include a negative assertion that without suspect, it isn't required? There's another test at line ~843 that asserts "Caracterizar não deve ser exigido na criação" (testAcidentePessoal...). That covers the non-suspect path? Actually the test at line 843 is for a different scenario (criação without aprofundamento_only). Let me not overreach.
Let me check whether there's an issue: in the test, since `descaracter_suspect = '1'` and `descaracterizado` missing, the validator returns error 'Informe se o evento é caracterizado como acidente (Sim/Não).'. The test asserts contains 'caracterizado como acidente'. OK.
Now, given user rules on tests: "Se a PR alterou comportamento e não trouxe teste novo/atualizado cobrindo esse comportamento, sinalize como pendência". Here a test was updated. It looks consistent.
Wait, but is this test change actually within the PR scope? The PR is about offboarding esocial. The test change seems unrelated to the declared scope. This could be flagged as an out-of-scope change. However, given the branch includes merge from new_production (sync), the Ssma test fix could be part of the sync/other change. But commit 747b40fb40 says "fix(tests): add suspect characterization field" — is this in the current PR's commits list? Yes, it's the head commit of the PR.
Hmm, but this test relates to SsmaEventValidator which is in src/Service/Ssma/. If the validator's behavior was changed elsewhere... Let me search the actual git state to check if the validator file was changed in this PR. The review_files only contains the test file. Let me check whether SsmaEventValidator.php was recently changed (in the diff base vs head). Since we can only read the current file, we can't compare old vs new for the validator. But based on the current logic, the test is consistent.
Let me look at the surrounding tests to make sure the test isn't duplicated elsewhere and check the line 843 area for test method ending (testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoMedicoExigeCaracterizar was renamed). Is there any reference to the old method name elsewhere? Renaming a test method is fine unless something reflects on it.
Now, given the review instructions: focus on issues in newly added code. The only changes: rename + added field 'descaracter_suspect' => '1'. This aligns the test data with new validator logic. Looks correct.
Wait, potential subtle issue: the test previously named "...ExigeCaracterizar" likely was written to test that characterization is required. With the new validator logic requiring suspect flag, the old test would have failed (no suspect, so no error). The fix adds the suspect. Good fix.
But is the test's assertion correct regarding the validator? Let me check: In the payload, there's `descaracter_suspect => '1'` as a string. In the validator, `$d` = details array. `!empty($d['descaracter_suspect']) && $d['descaracter_suspect'] !== '0'`. With '1', hasSuspect = true. Then `$descVal = array_key_exists('descaracterizado', $d) ? ... : ''`. descVal is ''. Not in ['0','1'], so error produced. Good.
Hmm, is there any mismatch: the test now tests only suspect path but the test name with "ComSuspeita" is good.
One more consideration: Since the whole set of payload is built for validating acidente pessoal; if this is the "aprofundamento only" path, other validations may also be triggered (like injury validations). The test just checks one error message is among the errors. Fine.
Now, do we need to check whether the test change introduces coverage gap for the non-suspect path? There was previously a test that (given validator old behavior) expected the error without suspect. Now that path isn't covered. But maybe there's another test that covers non-suspect not requiring characterization. Let me search within the test file for 'descaracterizado' / 'caracterizado como acidente' assertions to be thorough.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "caracterizado como acidente", "file_patterns": ["tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php"]}
Result
File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php Match lines: 3 454| || str_contains($e, 'caracterizado como acidente') 844| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'caracterizado como acidente')), 886| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'caracterizado como acidente')),
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "aprofundamento_only", "file_patterns": ["tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php"]}
Result
File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php Match lines: 1 860| 'aprofundamento_only' => true,
Request #4
deepseek-v4-flash
P:15.5K C:121 CR:15.23K CW:0
1719ms
Reasoning
Let me look at the test near line 454 and the surrounding context to understand what that test does, and line 843-847.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 470, "file_path": "tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php", "start_line": 400}
Result
File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php (Total lines: 990)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 400-470
400| self::assertNotEmpty($match, 'Esperava mensagem de Envolvimento. Erros: ' . implode(' | ', $errors));
401| self::assertStringNotContainsString('Categoria', $match[0]);
402| }
403|
404| public function testAcidentePessoalEtapa1SemAprofundamentoPassaValidacao(): void
405| {
406| $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
407|
408| $errors = $validator->validate([
409| 'type' => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_PESSOAL,
410| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
411| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
412| 'location' => 'Linha 2',
413| 'description' => 'Teste etapa 1',
414| 'details' => [
415| 'activity' => 'Operação de corte',
416| 'approach' => 'CORRECAO_OPERACIONAL', // default do formulário na 1ª etapa
417| 'person_id' => '101',
418| 'person_type' => 'COLABORADOR',
419| ],
420| ]);
421|
422| self::assertSame([], $errors, 'Etapa 1 não deve exigir campos do Aprofundamento. Erros: ' . implode(' | ', $errors));
423| }
424|
425| public function testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoCompleteExigeCamposTecnicosComMensagemHumana(): void
426| {
427| $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
428|
429| $errors = $validator->validate([
430| 'type' => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_PESSOAL,
431| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
432| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
433| 'location' => 'Linha 2',
434| 'description' => 'Teste etapa 2',
435| 'aprofundamento_complete' => true,
436| 'details' => [
437| 'activity' => 'Operação de corte',
438| 'approach' => 'CORRECAO_OPERACIONAL',
439| 'person_id' => '101',
440| 'person_type' => 'COLABORADOR',
441| 'had_injury' => true,
442| ],
443| ]);
444|
445| self::assertNotEmpty($errors);
446| $joined = implode(' | ', $errors);
447| self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.injury_type', $joined);
448| self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.descaracterizado', $joined);
449| self::assertTrue(
450| (bool) array_filter(
451| $errors,
452| static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Consequência real')
453| || str_contains($e, 'Tipo de lesão')
454| || str_contains($e, 'caracterizado como acidente')
455| ),
456| 'Esperava mensagens humanas do Aprofundamento. Erros: ' . $joined
457| );
458| }
459|
460| public function testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoPendingAindaExigeCampos(): void
461| {
462| $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
463|
464| $errors = $validator->aprofundamentoPendingErrors([
465| 'type' => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_PESSOAL,
466| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
467| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
468| 'location' => 'Linha 2',
469| 'description' => 'Pendente',
470| 'details' => [
Request #5
deepseek-v4-flash
P:16.58K C:479 CR:15.62K CW:0
4226ms
Reasoning
The changes in the test file look consistent with the validator logic. The test only changed to:
1. Renamed to make clear it's about the suspect path.
2. Added `descaracter_suspect => '1'`.
The test appears functionally correct, matching the current validator's behavior (characterization required only when suspect marked).
Now, is there a concern about test coverage: after this change, does the non-suspect path (approfondimento without suspect where caracterização should NOT be required) remain covered? The test at line 843-846 asserts that caracterização is not required in creation (testAcidentePessoalEtapa2Incompleto...). Actually, it asserts in the creation context. Hmm, but the renaming of the test method means the test now covers the suspect path.
Given the current diff's limited scope, the test modification seems sound. But per the "Regras de teste" — this test only exercises the domain validator (SsmaEventValidator) directly, not a full service path. However this is a unit test for a pure validator, so this is standard and appropriate. The rule "Teste deve cobrir o caminho de integração real (endpoint, service completo), não só uma função helper isolada" applies to authorization etc. For a validator unit test it's fine.
Now, should we flag anything? Let me consider the consistency between the test name and what it validates. The name is fine.
Let me double-check the validator's actual semantics: In the `validate` method, does `aprofundamento_only` block reaching the characterization requirement? The code only requires characterization when `aprofundamento_only` is truthy AND suspect is present. The test provides both. But wait — the test also has `aprofundamento_complete => true`. Let me read more context of the validate function to see how these flags interplay.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 679, "file_path": "src/Service/Ssma/SsmaEventValidator.php", "start_line": 560}
Result
File: src/Service/Ssma/SsmaEventValidator.php (Total lines: 887)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 560-679
560|
561| // fatal / barreira / causa imediata: opcionais (removidos do formulário de AP; legado ainda pode enviar)
562| if (array_key_exists('fatal', $d) && $d['fatal'] !== null && $d['fatal'] !== '') {
563| if (!\is_bool($d['fatal']) && !\in_array($d['fatal'], [0, 1, '0', '1'], true)) {
564| $errors[] = 'Campo fatalidade inválido.';
565| }
566| }
567| if (!empty($d['failed_barrier']) && !FailedBarrierEnum::isValid($d['failed_barrier'])) {
568| $errors[] = 'Barreira que falhou inválida. Selecione uma opção válida.';
569| }
570| // Dimensão trocada por Tipo de barreira (Brenda).
571| if (empty($d['barrier_type']) || !BarrierTypeEnum::isValid((string) $d['barrier_type'])) {
572| $errors[] = 'Tipo de barreira é obrigatório. Selecione uma opção válida.';
573| }
574| if (isset($d['immediate_cause']) && $d['immediate_cause'] !== null && !\is_string($d['immediate_cause'])) {
575| $errors[] = 'Causa imediata deve ser texto.';
576| }
577|
578| // Body map: condicional quando had_injury = true
579| if ($hadInjury && !empty($d['body_parts'])) {
580| if (!is_array($d['body_parts'])) {
581| $errors[] = 'Partes do corpo devem ser uma lista.';
582| } else {
583| $allowedHand = ['POLEGAR', 'INDICADOR', 'MEDIO', 'ANULAR', 'MINIMO'];
584| $allowedFoot = ['HALUX', 'SEGUNDO_DEDO', 'TERCEIRO_DEDO', 'QUARTO_DEDO', 'MINIMO_PE'];
585| $allowedCabeca = ['OLHO_ESQ', 'OLHO_DIR', 'BOCA', 'NARIZ', 'ORELHA_ESQ', 'ORELHA_DIR', 'TESTA', 'MENTO'];
586| $allowedPescoco = ['PESCOCO_ANT', 'PESCOCO_POST', 'PESCOCO_LAT_ESQ', 'PESCOCO_LAT_DIR'];
587| $allowedFace = ['FACE_BOCA', 'FACE_NARIZ', 'FACE_BOCHE_ESQ', 'FACE_BOCHE_DIR', 'FACE_MENTO', 'FACE_MAXILAR'];
588| $allowedOlhos = ['OLHO_ESQ', 'OLHO_DIR', 'SOBRANCELHA_ESQ', 'SOBRANCELHA_DIR'];
589| foreach ($d['body_parts'] as $i => $part) {
590| if (!\is_array($part)) {
591| $errors[] = 'Parte do corpo inválida.';
592|
593| continue;
594| }
595| if (empty($part['region']) || !BodyRegionEnum::isValid($part['region'])) {
596| $errors[] = 'Região do corpo inválida.';
597| }
598| if (!empty($part['side']) && !BodySideEnum::isValid($part['side'])) {
599| $errors[] = 'Lado do corpo inválido.';
600| }
601| if (!empty($part['injury_type']) && !InjuryTypeEnum::isValid($part['injury_type'])) {
602| $errors[] = 'Tipo de lesão inválido na região marcada.';
603| }
604| if (!empty($part['hand_finger'])) {
605| foreach (array_filter(array_map('trim', explode(',', (string) $part['hand_finger']))) as $v) {
606| if (!\in_array($v, $allowedHand, true)) {
607| $errors[] = 'Dedo da mão inválido: ' . $v;
608| }
609| }
610| }
611| if (!empty($part['foot_toe'])) {
612| foreach (array_filter(array_map('trim', explode(',', (string) $part['foot_toe']))) as $v) {
613| if (!\in_array($v, $allowedFoot, true)) {
614| $errors[] = 'Dedo do pé inválido: ' . $v;
615| }
616| }
617| }
618| $reg = (string) ($part['region'] ?? '');
619| if (!empty($part['cabeca_zones'])) {
620| if ($reg !== 'CABECA') {
621| $errors[] = 'Zonas de cabeça só são permitidas quando a região é Cabeça.';
622| } else {
623| foreach (array_filter(array_map('trim', explode(',', (string) $part['cabeca_zones']))) as $v) {
624| if (!\in_array($v, $allowedCabeca, true)) {
625| $errors[] = 'Zona de cabeça inválida: ' . $v;
626| }
627| }
628| }
629| }
630| if (!empty($part['pescoco_zones'])) {
631| if ($reg !== 'PESCOCO') {
632| $errors[] = 'Zonas de pescoço só são permitidas quando a região é Pescoço.';
633| } else {
634| foreach (array_filter(array_map('trim', explode(',', (string) $part['pescoco_zones']))) as $v) {
635| if (!\in_array($v, $allowedPescoco, true)) {
636| $errors[] = 'Zona de pescoço inválida: ' . $v;
637| }
638| }
639| }
640| }
641| if (!empty($part['face_zones'])) {
642| if ($reg !== 'FACE') {
643| $errors[] = 'Zonas de face só são permitidas quando a região é Face.';
644| } else {
645| foreach (array_filter(array_map('trim', explode(',', (string) $part['face_zones']))) as $v) {
646| if (!\in_array($v, $allowedFace, true)) {
647| $errors[] = 'Zona de face inválida: ' . $v;
648| }
649| }
650| }
651| }
652| if (!empty($part['olhos_zones'])) {
653| if ($reg !== 'OLHOS') {
654| $errors[] = 'Zonas de olhos só são permitidas quando a região é Olhos.';
655| } else {
656| foreach (array_filter(array_map('trim', explode(',', (string) $part['olhos_zones']))) as $v) {
657| if (!\in_array($v, $allowedOlhos, true)) {
658| $errors[] = 'Zona de olhos inválida: ' . $v;
659| }
660| }
661| }
662| }
663| }
664| }
665| }
666|
667| $workLeave = strtoupper(trim((string) ($d['work_leave'] ?? '')));
668| $injClass = strtoupper(trim((string) ($d['injury_classification'] ?? '')));
669| if ($hadInjury && $injClass === '') {
670| $errors[] = 'Classificação da lesão é obrigatória quando há lesão.';
671| }
672| if ($workLeave === 'PARCIAL') {
673| $errors[] = 'Afastamento parcial não é mais permitido. Use Com ou Sem afastamento.';
674| }
675| if ($workLeave !== '' && !\in_array($workLeave, ['NAO', 'TOTAL'], true)) {
676| $errors[] = 'Licença inválida. Use Sem afastamento ou Com afastamento total.';
677| }
678| if ($workLeave === 'NAO' && \in_array($injClass, ['LTI', 'LTI_FATALIDADE', 'LTI_INCAPACITANTE', 'FAT'], true)) {
679| $errors[] = 'LTI/FAT não é permitido quando a licença é Sem afastamento.';
Request #6
deepseek-v4-flash
P:19.09K C:1.76K CR:17.02K CW:0
13478ms
Reasoning
Now, since the change is test-only, and the test semantics match validator behavior, this is a low-risk change. But I should verify whether this change introduces test correctness issues, e.g., does this test still verify the message correctly, or could the rename be a problem?
Wait — actually, let me reconsider whether this is really in-scope for this review. The PR is "workflow-offboarding-esocial". This test change is related to SSMA validator (suspeita de descaracterização). This is likely a leftover from an earlier commit or cherry-picked fix to make the suite pass after validator changes merged. The test change itself is consistent.
But there's one consideration per user rules: if the test's payload now includes `descaracter_suspect => '1'` and `aprofundamento_only => true` but lacks `descaracterizado` and `descaracter_comment`... The error it triggers is only 'caracterizado como acidente (Sim/Não)' — that matches its assertion. However, the test title says "Médico deve informar se foi caracterizado" — correct.
Wait, one subtlety: with `descaracter_suspect => '1'`, the validation will produce the error message. But since the test doesn't set `descaracter_comment`, and `descaracterizado` missing, this produces the 'Sim/Não' error. Test asserts substring 'caracterizado como acidente' present. Good.
Is there any risk that with '1' in 'descaracter_suspect', and a `str_contains` check in the other tests (e.g., earlier test at 819 checking `details.descaracterizado:` does not appear) could be impacted? No, these are separate test methods.
Now, the diff changed only test code. Since it's a unit test for a domain validator, and it reflects a legitimate behavior change (characterization required only when suspect flagged), the change is appropriate. But should we check that there is a test covering the "non-suspect" path within aprofundamento_only? Because if a regression occurred where characterization is required even without suspect, no test covers the opposite. But per the previous test name (without ComSuspeita) — before the change the old test presumably expected the message to exist when... hmm. Actually wait — was the old test passing? The old test payload did NOT include `descaracter_suspect`. With the current validator, `hasSuspect` would be false and no error would be produced, so the old test would FAIL (asserting presence of the message). Hence the fix: add the suspect field. So this commit "fix(tests)" is a correction to make the test consistent with the new validator rule. It makes sense. The test now tests the suspect path.
But did the validator change belong to this PR? Possibly from the merge of new_production. Either way, the test change seems reasonable and internally consistent.
I think there's nothing substantive to flag on this test change. It's consistent with the validator logic. I might do a quick sanity run—but no ability to run tests.
Let me at least check line 886 region: The test uses `$errors` returned from validate. The assertion is fine.
One more check: Are the added value types consistent with what the real form sends? The template sends `descaracter_suspect` as integer 1 (checkbox value). The validator checks `!empty($d['descaracter_suspect']) && $d['descaracter_suspect'] !== '0'`. '1' string is fine.
Given the test now covers a scenario that matches the code path (only when suspect is present), I don't see a real defect.
However, given the strict rule "If a code issue has been identified and confirmed, call code_comment". Here, no confirmed issue. But let me double check one potential problem: the test data includes `'descaracter_suspect' => '1'`, but there is no `descaracterizado` key nor `descaracter_comment`. The validator will produce the error 'Informe se o evento é caracterizado como acidente (Sim/Não).'. But the test's assertion comment says 'Médico deve informar se foi caracterizado.' Consistent.
But hmm, one deeper consideration: with `descaracter_suspect='1'` but NO `descaracterizado`, would the deeper validation also require `descaracter_comment`? It's only when `descaracterizado` is '0'/'1'. Fine.
Should I check that the test still doesn't incorrectly expect an error that wouldn't be produced? The test asserts presence of substring. That's fine.
One other perspective: The user background says to review regressions. This test is part of the fix commit for tests. Because the branch also includes merges from new_production, the Ssma test change might be unrelated to this PR's functional scope, but it's a legit "keep tests green" fix after a validator behavior change that arrived through merge. Since the test aligns with current validator behavior, it's fine.
Actually, wait. Let me think more carefully about whether the test scenario is semantically right given what a real doctor flow sends. When a doctor finalizes the aprofundamento with a suspect of descaracterização checked, the UI would send `descaracterizado` with value '1' or '0' (Sim/Não) and a comment. The test expects the error message when `descaracterizado` missing. That tests the validation requiring the doctor to answer Sim/Não. OK.
But hold on — is there a possibility this test was supposed to ALSO set `descaracterizado` and assert that missing comment produces 'Comentário...obrigatório'? Not necessary.
Conclusion: The test change is fine and consistent. I do not find a confirmed code issue to report. Let me consider whether to flag a "pending" test gap — the rule: if the PR changed behavior and didn't add test covering it, flag as pending. Here the test was updated to cover the new behavior. But note: this PR's other files (AutomationExecutionService with +333/-5, migration +451) may not have dedicated tests, but those files aren't in the review_files group, so we should not comment on them (Strict Focus Rules: comments must address code within review_files).
Given the review group is only this test file, and I don't find defects, I should perhaps do a final check that the test's data is consistent in structure and there is no redundant leftover. Let me view the full new test method for any typo or duplicated variable.
I already read lines 849-889. Looks clean.
One consideration: The user rules mention "Teste que só instancia objeto de domínio sem passar pelo controller/service que decide acesso não substitui teste funcional do endpoint." — For this validator unit test change, that's not applicable since it's a pure validator.
Also, "Se a PR alterou comportamento e não trouxe teste novo/atualizado cobrindo esse comportamento" — behavior changes are elsewhere in the PR (not in review group). This test file change covers the Ssma validator's characterization-on-suspect behavior. But wait — where was the behavior changed? Was SsmaEventValidator changed in this PR? If not (e.g., the validator behavior predates this PR and the test was simply broken until now), then this fix commit merely repairs a failing test. In that case, is the fix correct? Yes — adding the suspect and renaming makes the test valid.
Alright. Let me confirm nothing else references the old test method name anywhere (e.g., @depends or risk groups). Search for the old name.
Tool Calls (2)
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoMedicoExigeCaracterizar"}
Result
No matches found
code_search
Show Details
Arguments
{"search_text": "descaracterizado", "file_patterns": ["tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php"]}
Result
File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php
Match lines: 9
41| 'descaracterizado' => '0',
145| 'descaracterizado' => '0',
184| 'descaracterizado' => '0',
226| 'descaracterizado' => '0',
252| 'descaracterizado' => '0',
448| self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.descaracterizado', $joined);
501| 'descaracterizado' => '',
691| 'descaracterizado' => '0',
819| self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.descaracterizado:', $joined);
Request #7
deepseek-v4-flash
P:21.03K C:513 CR:20.74K CW:0
4620ms
Reasoning
No stale references to the old method name. The change is consistent. I don't see a real defect in this test-only change.
Let me consider the possibility of a subtle test issue: The test method is now named "...ComSuspeitaExigeCaracterizar" and includes `descaracter_suspect => '1'`. However, the data still contains a fully valid acidente payload but does NOT include `descaracterizado`/`descaracter_comment`. The validator is expected to return the characterization error. But also consider: the test payload has `injury_classification => 'FAC'`, `work_leave` not set → not validated. Had injury true → classification present → no error. So the only assertion target is satisfied.
The scenario is logically coherent: a medical approfondimento with suspect marked and no "descaracterizado" answer → the doctor must state Sim/Não whether the event is characterized as an accident.
I find no issues to report in this review group. Per instructions, if no obvious code issues are found, call task_done.
Actually, wait. Let me reflect on the broader intent: Could this test change be missing a "non-suspect" counterpart, i.e., is there a test asserting that WITHOUT suspect, no characterization is required under aprofundamento_only? Given the validator now ties characterization to suspect flag, and the old test previously asserted characterization required even without suspect (which would fail), a proper change would be to have two tests: one with suspect (expects error) and one without suspect (expects no error). Only the suspect test is present here, and the non-suspect test from line 843 area seems to be about creation (not aprofundamento_only). Actually line 843-846 belongs to another test method (the test ending at 847 is "testAcidentePessoal...Etapa2"?). Let me look at lines around 700-847 to see which test the assertion at 843 belongs to and whether it covers aprofundamento.
Tool Calls (1)
file_read
Show Details
Arguments
{"end_line": 849, "file_path": "tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php", "start_line": 700}
Result
File: tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php (Total lines: 990)
IS_TRUNCATED: false
LINE_RANGE: 700-849
700| [],
701| $errors,
702| 'AP deve aceitar Leve…Severo + Tipo de barreira sem Dimensão. Erros: ' . implode(' | ', $errors)
703| );
704| }
705|
706| public function testAcidenteAmbientalEtapa1ComMeioPoluenteNaoDisparaAprofundamento(): void
707| {
708| $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
709|
710| $errors = $validator->validate([
711| 'type' => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_AMBIENTAL,
712| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
713| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
714| 'location' => 'Área externa',
715| 'description' => 'Vazamento contido',
716| 'details' => [
717| 'activity' => 'Transferência',
718| 'approach' => 'CORRECAO_OPERACIONAL',
719| 'environmental_medium' => 'SOLO',
720| 'pollutant_type' => 'ESGOTO_SANITARIO',
721| 'containment_done' => true,
722| ],
723| ]);
724|
725| self::assertSame(
726| [],
727| $errors,
728| 'Meio/poluente na identificação não devem exigir aprofundamento. Erros: ' . implode(' | ', $errors)
729| );
730| }
731|
732| public function testAcidenteAmbientalAceitaPollutantFreeTextLegadoNoResave(): void
733| {
734| $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
735|
736| $errors = $validator->validate([
737| 'type' => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_AMBIENTAL,
738| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
739| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
740| 'location' => 'Área externa',
741| 'description' => 'Vazamento legado',
742| 'consequence' => 'MEDIO',
743| 'aprofundamento_complete' => true,
744| 'details' => [
745| 'activity' => 'Transferência',
746| 'approach' => 'CORRECAO_OPERACIONAL',
747| 'environmental_medium' => 'SOLO',
748| 'pollutant_type' => 'Óleo hidráulico',
749| 'containment_done' => true,
750| 'potential_severity' => 'MEDIO',
751| 'potential_consequence' => 'ALTO',
752| 'barrier_type' => 'FISICA',
753| ],
754| ]);
755|
756| self::assertSame(
757| [],
758| $errors,
759| 'Poluente free-text legado deve permitir re-save. Erros: ' . implode(' | ', $errors)
760| );
761| }
762|
763| public function testAcidenteAmbientalRejeitaPollutantVazio(): void
764| {
765| $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
766|
767| $errors = $validator->validate([
768| 'type' => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_AMBIENTAL,
769| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
770| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
771| 'location' => 'Área externa',
772| 'description' => 'Sem poluente',
773| 'consequence' => 'MEDIO',
774| 'aprofundamento_complete' => true,
775| 'details' => [
776| 'activity' => 'Transferência',
777| 'approach' => 'CORRECAO_OPERACIONAL',
778| 'environmental_medium' => 'SOLO',
779| 'pollutant_type' => '',
780| 'containment_done' => true,
781| 'potential_severity' => 'MEDIO',
782| 'potential_consequence' => 'MEDIO',
783| 'barrier_type' => 'FISICA',
784| ],
785| ]);
786|
787| self::assertNotSame([], $errors);
788| self::assertTrue(
789| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'poluente')),
790| 'Deve exigir tipo de poluente. Erros: ' . implode(' | ', $errors)
791| );
792| }
793|
794| public function testToastAprofundamentoIncompletoUsaMensagensHumanasDoPrint(): void
795| {
796| $validator = new SsmaEventValidator();
797|
798| $errors = $validator->validate([
799| 'type' => EventTypeEnum::ACIDENTE_PESSOAL,
800| 'origin' => 'MANUAL',
801| 'datetime' => '2026-04-07T10:30:00',
802| 'location' => 'Linha 2',
803| 'description' => 'Toast da imagem — etapa 2 incompleta',
804| 'aprofundamento_complete' => true,
805| 'details' => [
806| 'activity' => 'Operação de corte',
807| 'approach' => 'CORRECAO_OPERACIONAL',
808| 'person_id' => '101',
809| 'person_type' => 'COLABORADOR',
810| 'had_injury' => true,
811| ],
812| ]);
813|
814| $joined = implode("\n", $errors);
815|
816| // Não pode mais aparecer o texto técnico do print antigo.
817| self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.injury_type:', $joined);
818| self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.injury_classification:', $joined);
819| self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.descaracterizado:', $joined);
820| self::assertStringNotContainsString('details.potential_consequence:', $joined);
821| self::assertStringNotContainsString('consequence: obrigatório', $joined);
822|
823| self::assertTrue(
824| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Consequência real é obrigatória')),
825| "Faltou mensagem de consequência real. Erros:\n{$joined}"
826| );
827| self::assertTrue(
828| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Consequência potencial é obrigatória')),
829| "Faltou mensagem de consequência potencial. Erros:\n{$joined}"
830| );
831| self::assertTrue(
832| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Consequência potencial / Gravidade é obrigatória')),
833| "Faltou mensagem de gravidade. Erros:\n{$joined}"
834| );
835| self::assertTrue(
836| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Tipo de lesão é obrigatório quando há lesão')),
837| "Faltou mensagem humana de tipo de lesão. Erros:\n{$joined}"
838| );
839| self::assertTrue(
840| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'Classificação da lesão é obrigatória quando há lesão')),
841| "Faltou mensagem humana de classificação. Erros:\n{$joined}"
842| );
843| self::assertFalse(
844| (bool) array_filter($errors, static fn (string $e): bool => str_contains($e, 'caracterizado como acidente')),
845| "Caracterizar não deve ser exigido na criação. Erros:\n{$joined}"
846| );
847| }
848|
849| public function testAcidentePessoalAprofundamentoMedicoComSuspeitaExigeCaracterizar(): void
Request #8
deepseek-v4-flash
P:23.54K C:639 CR:21.5K CW:0
4468ms
Reasoning
Now I have a full picture. The test change in this review group:
1. Renames the test to clarify it is about the "com suspeita" case.
2. Adds `descaracter_suspect => '1'` to make the validator actually require the characterization (which per the validator is only required when suspect is flagged).
The change is consistent with the current validator implementation. It's a test-only change, logically coherent. There is no bug. The non-suspect path (not requiring characterization) is also covered indirectly: e.g., the test at 794-847 with `aprofundamento_complete => true` and no suspect, asserts characterization is NOT required. That test uses `aprofundamento_complete => true` (not aprofundamento_only). In the validator, is the characterization-only required under `aprofundamento_only`. The test at 794 has `aprofundamento_complete` not `aprofundamento_only`, so that branch isn't reached there either... but anyway those are pre-existing.
Given the review group is a single test file with a well-scoped fix, and the test logic is aligned with the validator's actual behavior, I find no real code issue.
I'll call task_done since no obvious issues found in the reviewed group.
Concluí a análise do arquivo no grupo de revisão.
**Avaliação do `tests/Unit/Product/Ssma/SsmaEventValidatorTest.php`:**
A mudança é apenas de teste, em duas partes consistentes entre si:
1. Renomeação do método para deixar explícito que o cenário agora cobre "com suspeita de descaracterização".
2. Inclusão de `'descaracter_suspect' => '1'` no payload.
Conferindo com o código atual do `SsmaEventValidator` (linhas 715-730): a exigência de caracterização ("Informe se o evento é caracterizado como acidente (Sim/Não)") só dispara quando há `aprofundamento_only` **e** `descaracter_suspect` marcado (`hasSuspect`). Sem o novo campo, o teste antigo (que esperava a mensagem de erro) falharia — portanto a correção alinha o teste ao comportamento real do validador. A asserção (`str_contains 'caracterizado como acidente'`) casa com a mensagem gerada quando `descaracterizado` não é `'0'`/`'1'`.
Também verifiquei que não há referências remanescentes ao nome antigo do método e que o cenário não conflita com os demais testes do arquivo. Não identifiquei defeito funcional, problema de segurança, isolamento ou integridade de dados nesta alteração.
Tool Calls (1)
task_done
Show Details
Arguments
{"state": "DONE"}
Review Comments (9 findings)
migrations/Version20260901171000_SeedOffboardingEsocialFlowTemplate.php 2 comments
src/Service/AutomationExecutionService.php 7 comments
No comments match this filter.